Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Application - Permit
Garfield County No. Building & Sanitation Department 108 8th Street, Suite #401 Glenwood Springs, Co. 81601 Office 945-8212 Inspection Line 384-5003 Job Address: 1051 River Bend Way, GWS I }(j (, J 1 I Locality: ___ __;Ir::..o:..:n:..:b.:.:ri~dg!2;e:....:P:....:U.:.:D::....:...:, P:..:h:..:2;.;.., :..:fl~g ....:.1.:;:,2:..::.&:..:3;.;_, :..:L..:..ot=-7...:.9..:../ .=.23.:.:9-=5--0=-1=-4--2....:.9....:.0_7=-9 ____ , ·fr----------~ (\-\$""--L Use of Building: s/f dwelling on base w/cov patio & att garage 'I Owner: Dimento, Paul & Lisa Contractor: Hansen Const ----------------------~~~,-.. --. -. --L.-~-.~-,~--0~ Amount of Permit: $3,690.97 Date: ~ -~ .-v ( RFTA $750.00 ~. ' ?0. -+. . Total $4,440.97 f-().5:J-s Clerk: L ~ ~ T5~0·wf --~~~~~4---- GARF IELD COUNTY f3U ILDING PERMJT APPLI CAT I ~ t-; 108 8th Street, Su it e 401, Glenwood Springs, Co 81601 Phone: 970-945-8212 I Fax: 970-384-3470 I In spect ion Line: 970-384-5003 W\IW.l!ar fi eld -counrv .com -IDltfil- 2 3 4 5 6 Ph: Alt Ph: 7 Height: No . of F loors: 8 9 10 Class o f Work: o Alteration o Addition II Garage: Septi c: o De tached o Communi! 12 Driveway Penni!: e'ir NOTIC E ~· 'Ibis applicatio n for a Building Permit must be si ed by the Owner of the pro perty, described above, or an au thoriud agent. If the signarure be low is not that of the Owner, a separate le ner of au th ority, signed by the Owner, must be provided with this Application. Legal Accns. A Buildiog Permit canoot be iss ued with out proof of le gal and adequate access to the property for purposes of inspections by the Bui lding Department. Other P cnni!J, Multiple separate permits may be required: (I) State Electrical Penni~ (2) County ISD S Permit, (3) another permit required for usc on the pro perty identified above, e.g . State or Coun ty Highway/ Road Access or a State Wastewater Discharge Permit. Void Permit. A Building Permit becomes null and void if the work authorized is not commenced ,.,;thin 180 days of the date of issuance and if work is suspeoded or ab andoned for a period of 180 day s after commencement C ERTIFIC ATION I hereby certify that I have read thi s Application and that the information contained above is true and correct. I underst.aod that the Building Dcpartmcot ac cepts the Application, al ong with the plans and specifications and othe r data submitted by me or on my bcbal f (s ubmittals), based upon my certificatioo as to acc uracy . Assuming completene ss of the submittal s and approval of this Appli cation, a Building Permit ,.,;u be issued granting permission to me , as Owner, to constru ct the s trucrurc(s) and faciliti es detailed on the submittals revi ewed by the Building Department In consi derati on of the is suance of the Building Permit, I agree that I and my agents will comply with provisions of any federal, state or local law regulating the work and th e Garfield County Building Code, ISDS re gulations and applicable land usc regulations (County Regul ation(s)). I acknowledge that the Building Permit may be suspended or re voked, upon notice from the County, if the location, construction or us c of the structure(•) and facility(i cs), described above , are not in compliance with County Rcgulation(s) or any other appli cable law. I h ereby grant permission to the Building Department to enter the property, described above, to inspect the work . I further acknowledge that the issuance of the Building P ermit d o cs not prevent the Building Offici al from : (I) requiring the correction of errors in the submittals, if any, di scovered after issuance; or (2) stopping construc tion or usc o f the strucrure(s) or facility(i es) if such is in \iolation of Co unty Regulati on(s) or an y other applicable law. R eview of this Application, including •ubmitt.als, and inspections of the work by the Building Department do not co nstitute an acceptance of re sponsibili ty or liabili ty by the County of errors, omissions or discrepancies . As the Owner, I acknowledge th at re sponsibility for compliance "ith fed eral, state and local laws and County R egulations rest with me and m y auth orized agents, including wi thout limitation my architect designer, engineer and/ or builder. I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND 111E NOTICE & CERTIFI DATE STAFF USE ONLY Special Condition s: Adjus t ed Valuation : Plan C beck Fee: Permit Fee: Manu home Fee: Mise Fees : 5; 776 ~ 12!2 6 /. 1/1 12.5". ~ --.., ISDS Fee: Total Fees: F?l aid~ \ Balance Due: !!.f.li2 & Issue Date: ISDS No & I ss ued Date: zob . 6 6 )Z5.!:2. - Setbacks : OCCGroup : Co nst Type: Zoning: I S 15, 0 PUD I BLDG DEPT: PLNG DEPT: #~~ F/z~~ /1~£2-$ft~8' APPROVAL DATE APPROVAL DKTE VALUATION FEE DETERMI NATION Applicant Address Date Pau l DiMento Subdivision ~~~~~~----------------_1_0_5l __ Ri_· v_e_rb_e_nd __ W_a_._y ______________ Lot/Block 8/25 /2008 Contractor ~~~~-------------------- F inish ed (Livable Area): Main Upper Lower Other Total Basemen t: Unfinished Square Feet Valuation Conversion of Unfinished to Finished Total Valuation Garage: Carport: Total Crawl Space Total Decks/ Patios Total Valu ation Valuation Covered Open Valuation Type of Construction: Occupancy: Valuation Tota l Val uation sq.ft sq .ft sq .ft sq .ft X $74.68 0 s q.ft sq .ftX $41.00 sq .ft X $33.68 sq.ft X $18.00 sq.ft X $12.00 sq.ft X $9.00 sq .ft X $24.00 448 sq .ft X $12.00 Commercia l sf X sf X sf X sf X sf X sf X Iron bridge Lot 79 Owner 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,376.00 0.00 5,376.00 Applicant Address Date l'\ ().}'.& /( - t ~j:..w,?~-To h~ Bs~l'. VALUATION FEE DETERMINATION ..;;;D-:-;im~e;.::n,;.;;.to___,.....---:~-------Subdivision Ironbridge eh . ~ 1051 Rivel'8end Way Lot/Block 79 ~~~~~~---------~------------1 0110/2007 Contractor Hansen ~~~~----------~~~---------- Finished (Livable Area): M a in Upper Lower Other Total Square Feet Va luation 1690 sf X 1"f .b8 :: 14 62 sf 'X?"'. b9' .,. s f sf 3152 sf I ~ lt,1 .:2 o9 · ~o t\0~ I ( ~).. J{o ----- Basement: -+ I t.'IO., 14 .~e. 235,391.36 3fQ) ~OO .S""(o Unfinished Conve rs ion of Unfini s hed to Finished Total Valuati on Garage: Va luati on Crawl Space Valuation Decks/ Patios Covered Open Valuation Type of Construction: Occup ancy: Valuation Total Valuation 1690 sf X: t{ f .~ ~ sf 792 sf ,X{~. cro sf I 00 sf ~ ). cf.61> Commercial sf sf X sf X s f X s f X s f X sf X 69,290.00 14 ,2 56.00 0.00 2,400.00 0 .00 321 ,337.36 ~~0 97 11; ~()~ 2~~0 J78 zs-~ '$"(. GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING P ERMIT APPLI C ATI ON 108 s ·· Street, Suite 401, Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: 970-945-8212 I FllX : 970-384-3470 I lnspoctlon Line: 970-384-5003 Parcel/Schedule No : c;L:ff5-CJ I 'f -CL CJ -0 7q 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Class of Work: 9 Garage: 0 0 Single Double 0 Alteration Addition 0 Move Carport: 10 Driveway Pe rmit 0 On -Site Sewage Disposal 0 Site Plan 11 NOTICE A SEPARATE E LECTRICAL PERMIT IS REQUI RED AND MUST BE ISSUED BY THE STATE OF COLORI\DO. THIS PERMIT BECO MES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHLN 180 DAYS, OR, IF CONSTRU CTION OR WORI{ IS SUSPENDED OR ADANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 180 DAYS AT /\NY TIME AFTER WORK I S COMMENCED. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAM INED T HIS APPLICATION AND KNOW THE S AME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS GOVERNING THIS TYPE 01' WORK WILL BE COMPLETE D WITHIN WHETH ER SPECIFIED HEREI N OR NOT. THE GRANTING 0~' A PERM IT DOES NOT PRE SUME TO GIV E AUTHORITY TO VIOLAT E OR CANCEL THE PR OVISIONS OF' ANY OTHER STATE OR bOCAL LAW REGULATING CONSTRUCTI ON OR THE PERFORMANCE 0 CON STRU CTI O Zo ning: f«.D AGREEMENT Setbacks: . & Fee: (2 F\A-f) s-o ~ PERMISSION I S HEREBY GRANTED TO THE APPLICANT 1\S OWNER, CONTRACTOR AND/OR THE /\GENT OF THE CONTRACTOR OR OWNER TO CONSTRUCT THE STRUCTURE 1\S DETAILED ON PLANS AND SPBCiri CA'llONS SUBMITTED TO AND REVIEWED BY THE BUI LDI NG DEPARTMENT. IN CONS I DERATION OFTI-IE ISSSUANC E OF THIS PERM I T, THE SIGNER. HEREBY AGREES TO COMPLY WI TH ALL BUI LDING CODES A ND LAND USE: REGULATIONS ADOPTED BY GARFIELD COUNTY PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GIVEN LN 30.28.201 CRS AS AMENDED. THE SIGNER FURTHER AOREf;S THAT I F THf; ABOVf; SAJD ORDI NANCES 1\Rf; NOT FULLY COMPILED WITH IN THE LCOATION, ERECTION, CONSTRUCTION, AND USE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED STRUCTURE, THE PERMIT MAY BE: REVOKED BY NOTICE FROM THE CO UNTY AND TH AT THEN AND THERE IT SH ALL BECOME NULL AND V OID. THE I SSUANCE OF 1\ PERMT BASED UPON PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATI\ SHALL NOT PREVENT THE BUILDING OFFICIAL FROM THEREAFTER REQUIRING THE CORRECTION OF ERRORS IN SAJD PLANS, SPECIFICATI ONS AND OTHER DATA OR FROM PRE:VENTI NG BUI LDING OPERATION BEING CARRIED ON THEREUNDER WHEN IN VIOLATION OF'THS CODE OR ANY OTI-I ER ORDINANCE OR REOUJ,ATION OF THIS JURISDICTION. TfiE REVI EW Of SUBMITTED PLANS AND SPE:CIF'ICI\TI.ONS AND INSPECTIONS CONDUCTED TUER£1\FTEV OES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ACCEPTANC E OF ANY RESPONSIBILITIES OR L!ABLITIES BY GARFI ELD <::OUNTY_ FOR E RRORS, OMI SSIONS OR DISCREP Cl . THE: RESPONSI BILITY FOR TH ESE ITEMS AND IMPLEMENTATION DURING CONSTRUCTION RESTS SPECIF'ICIALJ,Y WITH THE AR'llCTECT, DE ION R, B UILDER, AND OWNER. COMMENTS ARE: I NTENDE:D TO BE CONSERVATIVE AND I N SUPPORT OF THE OWNERS J,NTEREST. I HEREBY ACKNOW LeDGE THAT I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTANQ THE AGREEME:NT ABOVE (INI'll/\1.):_¥-~-- q /Ji/ 07 de 'R O'tt 'J-~ :: d. I ~I. ) " ~ v : (Lfd-l. J-lo ) ~~A:~ /So. <5\J 7$//?70" ZF.?;A-m:;e- /Oj/ 'Kt vt-rz 73-e:.~ W""j ~ t=> -/O(ptj 7 rr: 6 rrtC"E.- ( 22'-7" ' RECEIVED SEP 1 0 2008 ,v/A GARFIELD COUNTY BUILD ING & PlANNING "' "' ;;. ;;. ,. "' "' . - st ·-s··----f4----------- I ~---__ j _ \ Ji . 3'-0 "--; J I ~L 1 A' PROVEU SUBJECT TO NOTE D .tXCEP110NS & I N S PEC110fe~ GARFIEL D C OUN'T't SUILR ING f1E PA~rf¥Er.r ·jele <-t-a, ~~ a:y~ F1ELD COPY IK> .,fcnoH wne«>~ ·t ~ Pt.AHI OM 1ft al ..s-.n I ,Q-,Pi! r --;· -.. 9-.lC .. <:-.61 r -r-=•--•-, I.-,I ~- __ .. o-.. 9 P::::, , li .. 9-.U i_7 -~-1------.. C-.6t- J--.. 9-.>--+ -t::-.. 9·.>-----; 1 r ..,. 1-5' w <") c;;-r----' , -.. 8·.9--;' I ,"'=:.!Rv 1 VALUATION FEE DETERMINATION Applicant Address Date ..;D:,:im~en:,::to:;_,.....-:-::,.--------Subdivision 1051 Rivel€end Way Lot/Block ..;1.;:0/:;;1:;;0/~20:i:0:::':7;='"'--'=-------Contractor Finished (Livable Area): Main Upper Lower Other Total Square Feet Valuation Basement: Unfinished Conversion of Unfinished to Finished Total Valuation Garage: Valuation Crawl Space Valuation Decks/ Patios Valuation Covered Open Type of Construction: Occupancy: Valuation Total Valuation 1690 sf )\ 1'1 • b8 " 1462 sfx?tt.t.ll' .- sf sf 3152 sf 1690 sf X'ff.ot> " sf 792 sf )(I'{. ()f) sf 100 sf~ ).'(.{fl) Commercial sf sf X sf X sf X sf X sf X sf X Iron bridge e k . ~ 79 Hansen I ~ L., .:2 O'l· -;lQ tiO"', t'a-;1.. 1\o 235,391.36 69,290.00 14,256.00 0.00 2,400.00 0.00 321,337.36 The following items are required by Garfield County for a final inspection: 1. A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector; 2. Pennanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department posted where readily visible from access road; 3. A finished roof, a lockable house , complete exterior siding, exterior doors and windows installed, a complete kitchen with cabinets, a sink with hot & cold running water, non-absorbent kitchen floor coverings, counter tops and fini shed walls, ready for stove and refrigerator, all necessary plumbing; 4. All bathrooms must be complete, with washbowl , tub or shower, toilet stool, hot and cold running water, non-absorbent floors and walls finished and a privacy door; 5. All steps outside or inside over three (3) steps must have handrails, guard rails on ba lconies or decks over 30" high constructed to all IBC and JRC requirements; 6. Outside grading done to where water will detour away from the building; 7. Exceptions to the outside steps, decks and grading may be made upon the demonstration of extenuating circumstances, i.e. weather, but a Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until all the required items are completed and a final inspection made; 8. A final inspection sign off by the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department for driveway installation, where applicable; as well as any final sign off by the Fire District, and/or State Agencies where applicable. 9. If you will be connecting to a public water and/or sewer system, proof of the tap fees have been paid and the connections inspected by the service provider prior to issuance of a C.O. A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. ****A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY TAKE UP TO 5 BUSINESS DAYS TO BE PROCESSED AND ISSUED. ****CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (C.O.) IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITIIOUT A C.O. WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATING PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET. I derstand and a r e to abide by the above conditions for occupancy, use and the issuance of a Ce 'ficate ofOccupa cy for the dwelling under building permit# ____ _ ~~~~~_____::__ '1. I J4 10 7 Signature Bpapplicationoctober2006 Date ~pr10 S-e_rJ-e..S 'PI o-n #-0 O.tY0 :S -L e__P}-- GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING 970-945-8212 MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS For SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING CONSTRUCTION In c luding NEW CONSTRUCTION A DDITIONS ALTERATIONS And MOVED BUILDINGS In order to und erst and th e sco pe of th e wo rk int end ed und er a permit a ppli ca ti on and ex pedite th e iss ua nce o f a permit it is imp orta nt that compl ete information be provided. Wh en re vi ew in g a pl an a nd it 's di sco vered that required inform ati on has not bee n pr ovided by th e a ppli ca nt , thi s will res ult in th e de lay of th e pe rmit iss ua nce and in pr ocee din g with buildin g constru cti on. The ow ne r o r co ntracto r sha ll be required to pr ov id e thi s informa t ion befo re th e plan revi ew ca n procee d . O th e r pl a ns th at a re in line for revi ew may be g iv e n attenti on before th e ne w in fo rm ati on ma y be rev iewed afte r it has been pr ovid ed to th e Buildi ng Departm ent . Please review this document to determine if you have enough information to design your project and provide adequate information to facilitate a plan review. Also, please consider using a design professional for assistance in your design and a construction professional for construction of your project. Any project with more than ten (10) occupants requires the plans to be sealed by a Colorado Registered Design Professional. To provide for a more und e rsta nd abl e pl an in ord e r t o determin e co mpli anc e with th e buildin g, plumbin g a nd me chanic a l codes, a ppli cant s are requ ested to revi ew th e fo ll o win g c heck li st pri or to and during desig n. Applicants are required to indicate appropriately and to submit the completed checklist at time of application for a permit. Plans to be included for a Building Permit, must be on drafting paper at least 18"x24" and drawn to scale. Plans mu st in c lud e a fl oo r pl an , a co ncrete foo tin g and fo und ati o n pl an, e leva ti ons a ll s ide s w ith deck s, ba lco ny, steps , hand rai ls and guard rails , windows and door s, in c ludin g the fini sh grade line and ori g inal grade. A sect ion s how in g in deta il , fi·om the bottom of the footi ng to the to p of th e roof, includin g re-bar , anc hor bolt s, press ure treated pl ates , fl oo r j oists, wall s tud s and spa cin g, in s ulation , sheeti ng, house-rap, (w hi c h is required), sidin g or any approved buildin g mater ia l. Eng in eered foundation s may be required . A window sc hedule . A door sc hed ule. A fl oo r fra min g plan , a roof framing plan , roof mu st be de sig ned to with stand a 40 pound per squ are foo t up to 7,000 fee t in e leva ti on, a 90 M.P.H. wind spee d, wi nd exposure B or C , and a 36 in ch fr ost depth . All s hee ts to be id e ntifi ed by numbe r a nd in dexed. A ll of th e above requ ir e me nts mu st be met o r yo ur plan s w ill be returned . All plans submitted mu st be in co mpli a nce with the 2003 IRC. I. Is a sit e pl an includ ed th at id ent ifie s th e locat ion of th e propose d st ru ct ure or addition and di stance s to the property lin es from each co rn er of the proposed stru cture(s) prepared by a li ce nsed surv eyo r a nd has the s urv eyors signature an d profes sional stamp on the drawing? Properti es with s lopes of 30% or greate r mu st be show n on the s ite pl a n. (NOTE Section: 106.2) Any s ite pl an for the pl acem ent of any portion of a stru c ture within 50 ft. of a property lin e and not w ithin a previou sly surv eye d building envelope on a s ubdivi s ion fin al pl at sha ll be pr epa red by a lic e nse d surv eyo r and hav e the sur veyor's signature and profess iona l stamp on the drawin g. Any structur e to be built within a building envelope of a lot show n on a recorded subdivi s ion pl at sha ll in c lude a co py of the build ing enve lope as it is show n on the final plat with the propo sed structure loc ated within the e nv elop e. Yes ¥. 2. Doe s the s ite plan a lso include any ot her building s on the property, setb ack easements a nd uti lity easement s? Plea se refer to Section 5.05.03 in th e Garfield Co unty Zo ning Reso luti on if th e pr operty yo u are app ly in g for a buildin g permit on is loca ted o n a corner lot. Spec ia l setb acks o appl y. Y es_---F>---- 3. Does the site plan in c lud e when applicab le the locat ion ofthe I.S .D.S. (Individu a l Sewage Di s posa l System) and the di stances to th e property line s, we ll s (o n subj ect prop erty and adj ace nt pro perti es), s tr eams or water co urses? Ye s f=- 4. Does the s ite plan indi ca te the locat ion and direction of the Co unty or private road access in g th e property? 2 5. 6. 7 . 8. 9. 10 . II. 12. 13. 14 . Yes :-{= Are yo u aware th at pri o r to su bmittal of a building permit app li ca ti o n yo u are required to show proof of a driveway access permit or obta in a statement from the Garfi eld Co unty Road & Bridge Department statin g o ne is not ne cessary? Yo u can cont ac t th e Ro ad & Brid ge Department at 625-860 I . Ye s '(" Do the pl ans in c lud e a foundati on pl a n indicating the size, locati on a nd spac ing of al l re inforcing stee l in acco rd ance wit h the IRC or per stamped eng in ee red de s ign? Ye s ~ D o the plans indi cate the locati on a nd s ize of ve ntil ation open in gs for und er floor c rawl space s and th e c lea rances required between wo od a nd earth? Ye s ('<' Do th e plan s indi cate th e s ize a nd locati o n of ve nt il at ion ope nin gs for th e atti c, roof j o is t spaces a nd soffi ts? Yes "f Do th e plan s includ e de sign loads as required by Garfi e ld Cou nty for roof snow loads , (a minimum of 40 po und s per squ are foot up to & in c luding 7,000 feet a bove sea leve l), floor loads and wind loads? Ye s_ '(G---- Does th e plan in clud e a building sec tion draw in g indicating foundation , wall , floor , and roo f co nstru c ti on? Yes T Does th e building secti on dra win g in c lude size and spac ing of fl oo r j o ists, wa ll stud s, ceilin g ~~~ts , ro~·afte r s o r joists or tru sses? Does th eiu~din g sec tion dra win g or othe r detail in c lu de th e meth od of pos itive co nn ection of a ll co lumn s and beams? Yes 'f Does th e e levati on pl an indi cate th e height of th e building or proposed additio n from th e undisturbed grade to them idp oin t between the ridge and eave of a ga bl e o r shed roof or the top of a flat roof? (Building height measurement usua ll y not to excee d 25 feet) Yes f= Doe s the plan in c lud e a ny stove or ze ro c lea rance fir epl ace planned for installati on includin g 3 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 2 0 . 21. 22. 23. make and m$.od I a nd Co loradoz_Pha se II ce rtificati ons or pha se II EPA certification? Yes No ----P-...L---- Does th e plan in clud e a ma so nry firepla ce in c ludin g a fir e pl ace sec ti on indi ca tin g design to comply with the IR C? ~ Yes No --~~--- Does th e plan in clud e a window sc hedul e o r oth er verification t hat eg ress/rescue windows from s leeping r oms and/or ba se ment s comply with the require ments of th e IR C? Yes No ------- Does the plan in clude a window sched ul e or oth er verification that wind ows pro vi de na tura l li ght and ventilation for a ll ha bit able roo ms? Yes ~ No ______ __ Do th e plan s indicate th e locati on of glaz in g s ubj ec t to human imp ac t s uch as gla ss doors, g lazi ng immediate ly adj ace nt to such doors; g lazi ng adjacent to any su rfa ce norm a ll y use d as a walking surface; s li ding gla ss doo rs; fi xe d g lass pa nels ; shower doo rs and tub enclosures and specify sa fet y glazing for th ese areas? Yes ~ No ______ _ Is th e locatio n of al l natura l and liquid petroleum gas fi.1rnace s, bo il e rs and wa ter heaters indic ated on the pl a n? Yes ('::.. No ______ _ Do yo u und e rstand th at if yo u are building on a pa rce l of land crea ted by the exe mpti on process o r the su bdi vis ion process , are bui ldi ng plans in co mpli a nce with a ll plat notes and/or covenants? Ye s ~ No __________ __ Do yo u understand th at if you belong to a Homeow ners Assoc iati on (HOA), it is your responsibility to obtain writte n permission from th e assoc iat ion, if required by th a t associa ti on, prior to submitting an application for a building permit? T he buildin g permit ap plicati on will be accepte d w ith out it , but yo u run the ri sk of th e HOA bringing ac ti on to enforce th e covenants , which can res ult in revoca ti on of permit iss ue d. Additionally, yo ur Pl an Review fee is no t refundable if the plan s have been reviewed by the Bui lding Department prior to any action by the I-lOA that requires eith er rev ocat io n or s ub stanti I modific at ion of the plans. Yes No ------- Will this be the only residential stru cture o n the parcel ? Yes X No l f no -Ex plain: I -------- 1-Jave two (2) comp lete sets of construct ion drawings been submitted w ith the ap pl ica ti on ? Yes 7 )( 4 24 . 25 . 2 6 . 27. 28 . 29. 30. 31. 32 . Do yo u understand th at th e minimum dim e ns ion a home can be on a lot is 20ft .w id e a nd 20ft. long? Yes ~ No ________ __ Have yo u de signed o r had thi s pl an des igned while con s id erin g buildin g and oth e r co nstructi o n co de require ment s? Ye s 'f=, No __________ _ Do yo ur pl a ns compl y with a ll zo nin g rul es and reg ulati ons in th e Co unty rel ated to yo ur pr o pertie s zo ne di stri ct? Yes f No ---------- Does th e pl a n accurately indic ate what yo u inte nd to con s tru ct and what will rec eiv e a fin a l in s pec ti on by the Garfi eld Co un ty Buildin g Depa rtm ent ? Yes q' No _________ _ Do yo u understand th at approval fo r des ign a nd/or co nstructi o n changes are required prior to th e a pplicati o n of these ch anges? Yes f No _____ _ Do yo u under stand th at the Buildin g De partm ent will coll ect a "Pl an Revi ew " fee fr om yo u at th e tim e of appli cati o n submittal and th at yo u will be required to pa y the "Permit Fee " as we ll as a ny "Road Impa ct" or "Se ptic Sys te m" fees requir ed, at th e tim e yo u pi ck up your buildin permit? Yes No ------ Are you aware that you must call in for an inspection by 3:30 the business day before the requested inspection in order to receive it the following business day? Inspections will be made from 7:30a.m. to 3:30p.m. Monday through Friday. Inspections are to be called in to 384-5003. Ye s 25::. No I --------- Are yo u aware th at requ es tin g in specti o ns o n wo rk th at is not ready or not accessible will res ult in a $50 .00 re-in s pection fee ? Yes JC" No __________ _ Are yo u awa re th at yo u are required to ca ll for a ll in specti ons required under th e IRC in c ludin g a pproval on a fin a l in specti on prior to rece ivin g a Ce rtifi ca te of Oc cupan cy and occup ancy ofthe buildin g? Yes ~ No __________ __ ( 5 33. 34. 35. 36 . 37. Are yo u awa re th at the Pe rmit Appli ca ti on mu st be s ig ned by the Ow ner or a writt en a uth or ity be in g give n for an Age nt a nd th at th e party res pons ibl e for th e proj ect mu st co mpl y w ith th e IR C? Y es ___ 'f--1----__ _ No ------- Do yo u und erstand th at yo u will be requir ed to hir e a St ate o f Co lorado Li cense d Elec tri c ian and Plumb e r to perform in sta ll ati ons and hook up s, unl ess yo u as th e homeow ne r a re performin g th e wo rk ? The li ce nse numb er of the per so n pe rformin g the wo rk will be req u ir ed at t im e of appli ca bl e in spec ti on. Yes ~ No _______ _ Are yo u aware , th at on the fr ont o f th e Bu ildin g Permi t Appli ca ti on yo u w ill nee d to fill in th e Parce l/Sc hedul e Numb e r fo r th e lot yo u a re appl y in g for thi s per mit on pri or to submitta l of a buildin:hg erm it a ppli cat ion ? Yo ur atte nti on in thi s is a pprec iated. Yes No --------- Do yo u kn ow th at th e loca l fir e di stri ct may re quire yo u to submit pla ns for th e ir rev iew of fi re sa fet y iss ues? Yes No (pl ease c heck w ith the buildin g departm e nt a bout thi s requireme nt ) Do yo u und e rst and th at if yo u are pl a nn in g on do in g an y ex cav atin g or gradin g to th e pr operty prior to iss uance of a buildin g permit th at yo u w ill be re quir ed to obt a in a gradin g pe rmit ? Yes {'. 38 . Are yo u awa re th at if yo u w ill be co nn ect in g to a public wa ter and /o r sewe r sys tem, th a t th e tap fees have to be pa id and th e co nn ec ti ons in spec ted by th e se rvice prov ider pri or to th e iss uance of a Ce rtifi ca te of Occ upa ncy? Yes + J I berebJ knowledge that I have read, understa nd and answered these questions to the best of my)abili~,. d 4/t-----~1)4/0 7 Signatur e of Owner Date No tes: If you have an swe red "No " on a ny of th e qu esti ons, yo u may e re quired to prov ide thi s 6 information at the request of the Building Official prior to beginning the plan review process. Delays in issuing the permit are to be expected. Work may not proceed without the issuance of a permit. !fit is determined by the Building Official that additional information is necessary to review the application and plans to determine minimum compliance with the adopted codes, the application may be placed behind more recent applications for building permits in the review process and not reviewed until required information has been provided and the application rotates again to first position for review, delay in issuance of the permit or delay in proceeding with construction. Bpminreq November2006 7 PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST Applicant \). ~o Building ~ineered Foundation _Loriveway Permit /surveyed Site Plan l)f 4 Septic Permit and Setbacks ~ GradefTopography 30% ~ttach Residential Plan Review List ~nimum Application Questionnaire ~ubdivision Plat Notes J:4t.-Fire Department Review V Valuation Determination/Fees ~Red Line Plans/Stamps/Sticker 4 Attach Conditions ____LLA.pplication Signed ---LL:f}an Reviewer To Sign Application ~eel/Schedule No. ~0# Snowload Letter-Manf. Hms . L / Soils Report GENERAL NOTES: Date. _ _.,~\p=-..... ::..._:.\-=D:__' ~c.>_1.l...--- Planning/Zoning ~roperty Line Setbacks ~Oft Stream Setbacks _0lood Plain __ Building Height v/ Zoning Sign-off ~oad Impact Fees ~OA/DRC Approval ~defTopography 40% ~anning Issues _Lsubdivision Plat Notes SIGNATURE: Lot: 079 3203-B-3 GENERAL: Legal Addr ess: 1051 River Bend Way Type: Sopris Series P lan: 3203 Elev : B Color: 3 Lender Info: Orientation: Release: 0 Type: F/P Seq.: 73 Lot Size: 22,244 Home Size: 3,079 SIGNATURE DATES Monday, September 10 ,2007 If DS 1: Monday, Sept ember 10,2007 REPORT OWNER INFORMATION KEY DATES: Name: Paul & Lisa DiMento Agreement Date: 3/20 /2007 Address: PO Box 8612 ProjectedCiose: 5/2 1/2007 City: Aspe n Closed: 5/24/2007 State: co Construction Start: Zip: 81612 Home 963 -43 17 Home Review: Fax 963-4304 Walkthrough: EmaiiAddress dimentos @comcast.n et DS2 : DS3: Page I of2 Lot: 079 3203-B-3 REPORT DESIGN OPTIONS: A RCHITECTURAL OPTIONS CHANGE ORDERS: CO # Date Dcscrilltion COMMENTS: Mond ay, September I 0, 2007 Page 2 of2 FUHRMANN ENGINEERING SERVICES, LLC STRUCTURAL CONSULTANTS May 12,2008 Jronbridge Homes, LLC 410 Ironbridge Drive Glenwood Springs, CO Attn: Mike Woelke Subject: Framing Revisions Plan 3203 Dear Mike: Iron bridge Community Garfield County, Colorado PLATTE RIVER PLAZA BLDG. 1205 S. PLATTE RIVER OR., STE 100 DENVER, CO 80223 OFFICE (303) 715·9885 FAX (303) 715·9890 Per our telephone conversation on May 9, 2008, we understand that the 18" deep Microllam beam specified in the main floor framing was notched to sit on the sill plate. Refer to the attached sketch for location of beam. The Microllam beam which extends below the bottom of the floor joists was cut flush with the vertical face of the foundation wall and the bottom of the beam was cut to the same elevation as the bottom of the floor joists to bear on the sill plate. We have reviewed this condition and calculations indicate that the notched Micro !lam beam is sufficient to carry the design loads cut. No repair is required. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely, Fuhrmann Engineering Services, LLC MatthewS. Peterson, P.E. Reviewed by: Q: '\LElTERS\Ironbridge Homcsil ronbridge _ 3203 _ FramingRcvision .doe (~TYP OF 7~ f-/ ~=-==M ~ r TYP OF 3(Hi)_ - ~NI:I:::::::::1f,=====·-·=···· J ... d~D" PROVIDE 6' -o" II! j/ YL MOVE WINDOW OPENING Wt tJ:;~"T!. Tfho\'r -ntrs '?,~ rA*1 Ia.-~\) "ft,t t l.l'f" 16 ~"-!.~ FiNz... =F<.m)fZ.~ P,..P?t.l!. 'l\-'l"lbN<:.... ' Assessor's Parcel No.SJ3CJ >-Dl v-,)._ 9 -l) 7 I Date (u/!6/o] I Weatherproofing __________ _ Mechanicai ______ ~------ Eiectrical Rough (State) _ __...,/~.c.../ ____ _ _ . .Jiectrical Final (State) __ ___::7 ____ ---oT_ ~7J"'i=inal P.-1-o~ /Checklist Compl~ted? Z -Certificate Occup{lncy # ..,l~O'-'l--"l_lt?=--~,.,....--~~~:zz;,~~~~_a~~~~U.. Date 1 S£U ... e/D J:;;;...·J·i..J6 Septic System # --L''-f' _,_Ac__ _______ _ Date-----------Final __________ _ NOTES ~;~A~~&0e- ~c£..u-e_t3/ 1 J$. J-.5 -p Sl;;... C:,f"' S> . f.. \ _ -A--1 (co?Jinue on back) 1-/2...~0& ,..,.... J ~ ~ '{{-5CJ-b• bg COUNTY OF GARFIELD-BUILDING DEPARTMENT CORRECTION NOTICE 108 8th St., Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado Phone(970)945~212 Job located at /o.S'j ~ e~ ~ Permit No. ___LI__,O.:::..(,(.?,..L...Lf?__L__ ____________ _ I have this day inspected this structure and these premises and found the following corrections needed: ilcall for Re-lnspection 0 $50.00 Re-lnspection Fee must be paid prior to Re-lnspection You are hereby notified that the above correction must be inspected before covering. When correction(s) have been made, call for inspection at 970-384-5003. Date ;/r-.:A..6.-CJft 20 Buildi~g Inspector ~~-"'""""'"""''::-- Phone (970) 945-8212 COUNTY OF GARFIELD -BUILDING DEPARTMENT CORRECTION NOTICE 108 8th St., Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado Phone (970) 945-8212 Joblocatedat~/12~~~9~7~------------------------ PermitNo. /0~/ ~~*-'~--- 1 have this day inspected this structure and these premises and found the following corrections needed: QtCall for Re-lnspection . 0 $50.00 Re-lnspection Fee must be paid prior to Re-lnspection You are hereby notified that the above correction must be inspected before covering. When correction(s) have been made, call for inspection at 970-384-5003. Date /1-!9'-0'/? 20 ----:?.------~~--Buildi~glnspector ~ - Phone (970) 945-8212 COUNTY OF GARFIELD -BUILDING DEPARTMENT CORRECTION NOTICE 108 8th St., Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado Phone (970) 945-8212 Job located at !05/ ~ ?J~ cu/~ Permit No. /06Ci 7 I have this day inspected this structure and these premises and found the following corrections needed: )t. Call for Re-lnspection %$50.00 Re-lnspection Fee must be paid prior to Re-lnspection You are hereby notified that the above correction must be inspected before covering. When correction(s) have been made, call for inspection at 970-384-5003. Date L/-/6-o? 20 =----- Building Inspector ~.5'/??~ Phone (970) 945-8212 C.OUN:'TY Ol= GARFIELD -BUILDING DEPARTMENT .-, CORRECTION NOTICE 108 8th st., Suite 201 Glenwood Springs, Colorado Phone (970) 945-8212 Job 1 ocated at _ __jj[__cOu___5__J_JI:___ __ f2~L'' <-;,:_1 &U!;:L._Jic...~u.JL""=111-<'""""l'-"MY..L1-k;f-l Permit No. ___ --Ll ~OutQ_, .:Jct_1_t__ ______ _ 1 have this day inspected this structure and these premises and found the following corrections needed: s-nzo..r. s @__, r-~ po v.J ~. f2.uv-J"\ v ~ ~ FloeilL c~J ,=-,J.J I 5 ~ i3e<4N'I 'J CirZ<'h0-~L ~~ /6 Ke pvvj- fZou { Le"'k .0()_ ~ 12. ' . I -v-.JGL.~" ·ro . ...,.... \ Ll /') k~R<L AT\~\\ l')rtw<- I L.\ . ...v"" s "'-vr \-, .;,.../ I..: ) 1~-'r\\oc."' 1-Jtc;..vl.-<_ e )c.:..<Lc iA..Jt.tll ;.....;)~ f"-'-ph.l) {2) f--'Qu!'~ A-ppna.;e,( 0Jt-"!W,.;c.'i o;-) sJe. You are hereby notified that the above correction oll'ust be inspected before covering. When correction(s) have been made, call for inspection at 970-384-5003. 20____QL_ Building Inspector ___ ...!..{L.f.:k.bcl--.t\c--l~~ll~------ Phone (970) 945-8212 0 I Date 3 · 3/ COUNTY OF GARFIELD -BUILDING DEPARTMENT CORRECTION NOTICE 108 8th St., Suite 201 Glenwood Springs, Colorado Phone (970) 945-8212 Job located at )(5{1 ~ e~~ PermitNo. __ L/~~~~~?~(?L_ ________________________ _ I have this day inspected this structure and these premises and found the following corrections needed: J)~~~<V z)[Jd/r~~, You are hereby notified that the above correction must be inspected before covering. When correction(s) have been made, call for inspection at 970-384-5003. INSPECTION WILL NOT BE MADE UNLESS THIS CARD IS POSTED ON THE JOB 24 HOURS NOTICE REQUIRED FOR INSPECTIONS BUILDING PERMIT GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO Date Issued .• Jg_/f~/~7...zoned Area ............................... Permit No ...... ../~.fJ .. ? .. . AGREEMENT In consideration of the issuance of this permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with all laws and regulations related to the zoning, (()(ation; construction and erection of the proposed structure for which this permit is granted, and further agrees that if the above said regulations are not fully complied with in the zoning, location, erection and construction of the above described structure, the permit may then be revoked by notice from the County Building Inspector and IMME~IATEL Y BECOME NULL AND YOID. (/Lee 'tt ro fJ J• {! · btrre "" rcr Setbacks Front Side Side Rear Tbis Card Must Be Posted So It is Plaiilly Visible From The Street Until Finallnspectio~. INSPECTION RECORD Footing I o · ?.-6 -o? 'fVl7" #N/4:ik. Driveway Foundation ; f·/J--o 7;?.l2JZ._ A l/·d-/07: i(Ai£._ ~ 5JmZ Underground Plumbing 1:?.-6-o?~ Insulation.;JII!! RoughPlumbing 2-;).7-cR~ Drywall '1-::>.>·ox 4llJ-:l.. Chimney & Vent '1·1-<~&--tJH'--Electric Final (by State In;;!S<9 tiwl tfJF (, /5 Gas Piping 7-:;;>..7 ·OS" Final;,;<.-/-OX'. -_.,; 9F Electric Rougb (By State Inspector) Septic Final ,11//H Framing '1-9-oS;th?'< (.~ A$,.r Notes: ctU-4. ,{§~ 8'-;;>.8·66??7-'- (To include Roof in place and mdows IJp;ct< F,<;A/1!€ 9-f--oS p.'u)_ and Doors installed) . .fk~ A f/L- ALL LISTED ITEMS MUST BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE COVERING - WHETHER INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR, UNDERGROUND OR ABOVE GROUND. THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE For Inspections Call384-5003 108 8th Street Glenwood Springs, Colorado APP¥~VEDDO NOT DESTROY THIS CARD Date JD ( 01 By ~ • IJr{E. IF PLACED~ COVER WITH CLEAR PLASTIC ~ech HEPWORTH· PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL SUBSQU, STUDY Hepworrh-Pawh'k GeJ..1!echnical 1 Inc. 5020 Coumy Rot~d 154 Glenwood Springs, Colnrado 81601 Phon" 970-945-7988 Fa" 970-945-8454 email: hpgeo@hpgemech.com FOR FOUNDATION DESIGN PROPOSED RESIDENCE LOT 79, RIVER BEND WAY ffiONBRIDGE SOPRIS LOTS PIIASE 2 GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO JOB NO. 107 0486 JULy 20, 2007 PREPARED FOR: IRONBRIDGE HOMES, LLC ATTN: JODI THIMSEN 410 ffiONBRIDGE DRIVE GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81601 Parker 303-841-7119 • Colorado Springs 719-633-5562 • Silverthorne 970-468-1989 TABLE OF CONTENTS PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY ............................................................................ -I - PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ..................................................................................... -I - SITE CONDITIONS ....................................................................................................... -2- SUBSIDENCE POTENTIAL ......................................................................................... -2- FIELD EXPLORATION ................................................................................................. -3- SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS ...................................................................................... -3- FOUNDATION BEARING CONDITIONS .................................................................. -4- DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................. -4- FOUNDATIONS ......................................................................................... : ............... -4- FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS ............................................................ -5- FLOOR SLABS .......................................................................................................... -6 - UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM .......................................................................................... -7- SURFACE DRAINAGE ............................................................................................. -8- LIMITATIONS ............................................................................................................... -8- FIGURE I -LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORING FIGURE 2-LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING FIGURE 3 -LEGEND AND NOTES FUGURE 4-GRADATION TEST RESULTS TABLE 1-SUMMARY OF LAB ORA TORY TEST RESULTS PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY This report presents the results of a subsoil study for a proposed residence to be located on Lot 79, River Bend Way, Ironbridge Sopris Lots Phase 2, Garfield County, Colorado. The project site is shown on Figure I. The purpose of the study was to develop recommendations for the foundation design. The study was conducted in accordance with our agreement for geotechnical engineering services to lronbridge Homes, LLC dated June 22, 2007. Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical previously conducted geotechnical engineering studies for the subdivision development and presented the findings in reports dated October 29, 1997 and February 12, 1998, Job No. 197 327. We also performed observation and testing of compaction during the Phase 2 infrastructure construction and presented our findings in daily reports under Job No. I 06 0367. An exploratory boring was drilled on the lot to obtain information on the subsurface conditions. Samples of the subsoils obtained during the field exploration were tested in the laboratory to determine their classification and other engineering characteristics. The results of the field exploration and laboratory testing were analyzed to develop recommendations for foundation types, depths and allowable pressures for the proposed building foundation. This report summarizes the data obtained during this study and presents our conclusions, design recommendations and other geotechnical engineering considerations based on the proposed construction and the subsurface conditions encountered. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION The proposed residence will be a 2-story wood frame structure with a walkout basement level. Ground floors will be slab-on-grade. Grading for the structure is assumed to be relatively minor with cut depths between about 3 to 8 feet. We assume relatively light foundation loadings, typical of the proposed type of construction. If building loadings, location or grading plans change significantly from those described above, we should be notified to re-evaluate the recommendations contained in this report. Job No. 107 0486 -2- SITE CONDITIONS The lot is located on a strongly sloping alluvial fan along the uphill, western side of River Bend Way and across from the intersection with River Bank Way. The Robertson Ditch {now buried) and easement borders the uphill side of the lot. The ground surface has been graded relatively flat during the s11bdivision development and slopes down to the northeast with a few feet of elevation difference across the building area. Vegetation consists of sparse grass and weeds. A natural dry drainage channel is located about 250 feet north of the lot. SUBSIDENCE POTENTIAL Bedrock of the Pennsylvanian age Eagle Valley Evaporite underlies the Iron bridge Development. These rocks are a sequence of gypsiferous shale, fine-grained sandstone and siltstone with some massive beds of gypsum and limestone. There is a possibility that massive gypsum deposits associated with the Eagle Valley Evaporite underlie portions of the lot. Dissolution of the gypsum under certain conditions can cause sinkholes to develop and can produce areas of localized subsidence. During previous studies for the subdivision development, several sinkholes were obse1ved scattered throughout the Jronbridge Development. These sinkholes appear similar to others associated with the Eagle Valley Evaporite in areas of the Roaring Fork River valley. The closest apparent sinkhole to Lot 79 is located about I 00 feet to the east along the south side of River Bend Way and River Bank Way intersection. The sinkhole was excavated, backfilled and grouted during construction of the roadway. Sinkholes related to the underlying formation rock were not observed in the immediate area of the subject lot. No evidence of cavities was encountered in the subsurface materials; however, the exploratory boring was relatively shallow, for foundation design only. Based on our present knowledge of the subsurface conditions at the site, it cannot be said for certain that sinkholes will not develop. The risk of future ground subsidence on Lot 79 Job No. 107 0486 - 3 - throughout the service life of the proposed residence, in our opinion, is low; however, the owner should be made aware of the potential for sinkhole development. FIELD EXPLORATION The field exploration for the project was conducted on June 29, 2007. One exploratory boring was drilled at the location shown on Figure I to evaluate the subsurface conditions. The boring was advanced with 4 inch diameter continuous flight augers powered by a truck -mounted CME-45B drill rig. The boring was logged by a representative of Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. Samples of the subsurface materials were taken with 1% inch and 2 inch J.D. spoon samplers. The samplers were driven into the subsurface materials at various depths with blows from a I 40 pound hammer falling 30 inches. This test is similar to the standard penetration test described by ASTM Method D-I 586. The penetration resistance values are an indication of the relative density or consistency of the subsoils. Depths at which the samples were taken and the penetration resistance values are shown on the Log of Exploratory Boring, Figure 2. The samples were returned to our laboratory for review by the project engineer and testing. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS A graphic log of the subsurface conditions encountered at the site is shown on Figure 2. The subsoils consist of mixed silty sand and gravel with cobble fill overlying dense, silty sandy gravel, cobbles and boulders (terrace alluvium). Drilling in the dense terrace alluvium with auger equipment was difficult due to the cobbles and boulders and drilling refusal was encountered in the deposit. Borings drilled in the area typically found debris fan soils at shallow depth and the terrace alluvium to be on the order of I 0 to 15 feet thick above the Eagle Valley Evaporite. The existing fill material was placed during the subdivision development and monitored during construction for compaction by Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical. Job No. 107 0486 -4- Laboratory testing performed on samples obtained from the boring included natural moisture content and gradation analyses. The debris fan soils (where present) in their natural dry condition typically tend to collapse (settle under constant load) when wetted. Results of gradation analyses performed on a small diameter drive sample (minus I Y, inch fraction) of the granular fill soils are shown on Figure 4. The laboratory testing is summarized in Table J. No free water was encountered to the drilled depth of 11 Y, feet and the soils were slightly moist to moist with depth. FOUNDATION BEARING CONDITIONS The soils at expected cut depth consist of compacted silty sand and gravel fill. Any debris fan soils on the lot would be expected to have some collapse potential when welted. Shallow spread footings placed on the compacted fill or natural soils should be feasible for the building support with some risk of settlement and distress. The risk of settlement appears low due to the relatively shallow depth of the compressible soils but the settlement potential should be further evaluated at the time of construction. Extending the bearing level down to the dense terrace alluvium would have a low settlement potential. DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS FOUNDATIONS Considering the subsurface conditions encountered in the exploratory boring and the nature of the proposed construction, we recommend the building be founded with spread footings bearing on compacted structural fill or the natural soils. The design and construction criteria presented below should be observed for a spread footing foundation system. I) Footings placed on compacted structural fill or the natural soils should be designed for an allowable bearing pressure of I ,000 psf. Based on experience, we expect initial settlement offootings designed and · constructed as discussed in this section will be about! inch or less. lob No. 107 0486 -5- Additional settlement of about I inch could occur ifthe bearing soils at shallow depth are wetted. Footings placed entirely on the dense terrace alluvium can be designed for an allowable bearing pressure of 4,000 psf. 2) The footings should have a minimum width of 20 inches for continuous walls and 2 feet for isolated pads. 3) Exterior footings and footings beneath unheated areas should be provided with adequate soil cover above their bearing elevation for frost protection. Placement of foundations at least 36 inches below exterior grade is typically used in this area. 4) Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span local anomalies such as by assuming an unsupported length of at least 12 feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining structures should also be designed to resist lateral earth pressures as discussed in the "Foundation and Retaining Walls" section of this report. 5) Any topsoil and loose or disturbed soils should be removed and the footing bearing level extended down to the suitable compacted or natural soils. The exposed soils in footing area should then be moistened to near optimum and compacted. 6) A representative of the geotechnical engineer should observe all footing excavations prior to concrete placement to evaluate bearing conditions. FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS Foundation walls and retaining structures which are laterally suppotted and can be expected to undergo only a slight amount of deflection should be designed for a lateral earth pressure computed on the basis of an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 55 pcf for backfill consisting of the on-site soils. Cantilevered retaining structures which are separate from the residence and can be expected to deflect sufficiently to mobilize the full active earth pressure condition should be designed for a lateral earth pressure computed on the basis of an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 45 pcf for backfill consisting of the on-site soils. lob No. 107 0486 -6- All foundation and retaining structures should be designed for appropriate hydrostatic and surcharge pressures such as adjacent footings, traffic, construction materials and equipment. The pressures recommended above assume drained conditions behind the walls and a horizontal backfill surface. The buildup of water behind a wall or an upward sloping backfill surface will increase the lateral pressure imposed on a foundation wall or retaining structure. An underdrain should be provided to prevent hydrostatic pressure buildup behind walls. Backfill should be placed in uniform lifts and compacted to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density at near optimum moisture content. Backfill in pavement and walkway areas should be compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density. Care should be taken not to overcompact the backfill or use large equipment near the wall, since this could cause excessive lateral pressure on the wall. Some settlement of deep foundation wall backfill should be expected, even if the material is placed correctly, and could result in distress to facilities constructed on the backfill. The lateral resistance of foundation or retaining wall footings will be a combination of the sliding resistance of the footing on the foundation materials and passive earth pressure against the side of the footing. Resistance to sliding at the bottoms of the footings can be calculated based on a coefficient of friction of0.4. Passive pressure of compacted backfill against the sides of the footings can be calculated using an equivalent fluid unit weight of 350 pcf. The coefficient of friction and passive pressure values recommended above assume ultimate soil strength. Suitable factors of safety should be included in the design to limit the strain which will occur at the ultimate strength, particularly in the case of passive resistance. Fill placed against the sides of the footings to resist lateral loads should be compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. FLOOR SLABS The natural on-site soils and compacted fill are suitable to support lightly loaded slab-on- grade construction. To reduce the effects of some differential movement, floor slabs should be separated from all· bearing· walls and columns with expansionjointswhich · lob No. 107 0486 -7- allow unrestrained vertical movement. Floor slab control joints should be used to reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking. The requirements for joint spacing and slab reinforcement should be established by the designer based on experience and the intended slab use. A minimum 4 inch layer of free-draining gravel should be placed beneath basement level slabs to facilitate drainage. This material should consist of minus 2 inch aggregate with at least 50% retained on the No. 4 sieve and less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve. All fill materials for support of floor slabs should be compacted to at least 95% of maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Required fill can consist of the on-site soils devoid of vegetation, topsoil and oversized rock. UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM Although free water was not encountered during our exploration, it has been our experience in the area that local perched groundwater can develop during times of heavy precipitation or seasonal runoff. Frozen ground during spring runoff can create a perched condition. We recommend below-grade construction, such as retaining walls and basement areas, be protected from wetting and hydrostatic pressure buildup by an underdrain system. An underdrain should not be provided around shallow foundations (3 feet deep or Jess) and slab-on-grade garage areas. The drains should consist of drainpipe placed in the bottom of the wall backfill surrounded above the invert level with free-draining granular material. The drain should be placed at each level of excavation and at least I foot below lowest adjacent finish grade and sloped at a minimum I% to a suitable gravity outlet or sump and pump. Free- draining granular material used in the underdrain system should contain Jess than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve, less than 50% passing the-No. 4 sieve and have a maximum size of2 inches. The drain gravel backfill should be at least I Vz feet deep. An impervious membrane, such as a 30 mil PVC liner, should be placed beneath the drain gravel in a trough shape and attached to the foundation wall with mastic to prevent wetting of the bearing soils. Job No. 107 0486 -8- SURFACE DRAINAGE The following drainage precautions should be observed during construction and maintained at all times after the residence has been completed: 1) Inundation of the foundation excavations and underslab areas should be avoided during construction. 2) Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density in pavement and slab areas and to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density in landscape areas. 3) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions. We recommend a minimum slope of 12 inches in the first 1 0 feet in unpaved areas and a minimum slope of 3 inches in the first 1 0 feet in paved areas. Free-draining wall backfill should be capped with about 2 feet of the on- site finer grained soils to reduce surface water infiltration. 4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill. 5) Landscaping which requires regular heavy irrigation, such as sod, and sprinkler heads should be located at least 1 0 feet from foundation walls. LIMlTATIONS This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no warranty either express or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the exploratory boring drilled at the location indicated on Figure 1, the proposed type of construction and our experience in the area. Our services do not include determining the presence, prevention or possibility of mold or other biological contaminants (MOBC) developing in the future. If the client is concerned about MOBC, then a professional in this special field of practice should be consulted. Our findings include interpolation and extrapolation of the subsurface Job No. 107 0486 -9- conditions identified at the exploratory boring and variations in the subsurface conditions may .not become evident until excavation is performed. If conditions encountered during construction appear different from those described in this report, we should be notified so that re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes. We are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. As the project evolves, we should provide continued consultation and field services during construction to review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations, and to verify that the recommendations have been appropriately interpreted. Significant design changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommendations presented herein. We recommend on-site observation of excavations and foundation bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a representative of the geotechnical engineer. Respectfully Submitted, Reviewed by: SLP/vad cc: Fuhrmann Engineering-Jamie Andreassen (jandreassen@fuhrmannengineering.com) Job No. 107 0486 LOT78 107 0486 RIVER BEND WAY ----------~ ---..--7 ----I r 1 I I I BORING 1 1 I e II I I I I I LOT79 I I I I I I / I I \ I _..-/ \ \ ---~--- I I I I I I I I I I I APPROXIMATE SCALE 1" = 50' ~ LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORING Figure 1 He worth-Powfok Gootechnlcol 0 5 a! lL .<;;; a. "' 0 10 15 107 0486 BORING 1 LOT79 5/6,20/6 28/12 WC~5.6 +4=29 -200=32 T 20/0 NOTE: Explanation of symbols is shown on Figure 3. ~ H worth-Powtok Geotechnrcor LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING 0 5 1ii of ' ~ 10 0 15 Figure 2 LEGEND: ~ FILL; silty sand and gravel with cobbles, medium dense, slightly moist to moist, brown. m GRAVEL, COBBLES AND BOULDERS (GM-GP); silty, sandy, dense, slightly moist, brown, rounded rock. p Relatively undisturbed drive sample; 2-inch I.D. California liner sample. ~ Drive sample; standard penetration test (SPT), 1 3/8 inch J.D. split spoon sample, ASTM-1586. Drive sample blow count; indicates that 25 blows of a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches were 25/12 required to drive the California or SPT sampler 12 inches. T NOTES: Practical drilling refusal. Where shown above bottom of Jog, ind1cates that multiple attempts were made to advance the boring. 1. The exploratory boring was drilled on June 29, 2007 with a 4-inch diameter continuous flight power auger. 2. The exploratory boring location was measured approximately by pacing from features shown on the subdivision plat drawing. 3. The exploratory boring elevation was not measured and the log of exploratory boring is drawn to depth. 4. The exploratory boring location should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. 5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory boring log represent the approximate boundaries between material types and transitions may be gradual. 6. No free water was encountered in the boring at the lime of drilling. Fluctuation in water level may occur with lime. 7. Laboratory Testing Results: WC = Water Content (%) + 4 = Percent retained on the No. 4 sieve -200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve 107 0486 LEGEND AND NOTES Figure 3 I HYDROMETER ANALYSIS SIEVE ANALYSIS J ), TIME READINGS I U.S. STANDARD SERIES I CLEAR SQUARE OPENINGS I 0 ~ ~-1~ ~-60MIN19MIN.4 MIN 1 MIN. #200 #100 #50 #30 #16 #8 #4 '3/8' '3/4' 1 1/2' 3' 5'6' 8' 100 0 w z ;! w ~ .... z ~ ffi n. 10 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 .001 .002 .005 .009 .019 .037 .074 .160 .300 .600 1.18 2.36 4.75 9.5 19.0 37.5 76.2 152 203 12.5 127 DIAMETER OF PARTICLES IN MILLIMETERS •v~• GRAVEL 29 % SAND 39% SILT AND ClAY 32 % LIQUID LIMIT % PlASTICITY INDEX % SAMPLE OF: Silty Sand and Gravel -Fill FROM: Boring 1 at 5 Feet, Lot 79 .. ''''"''' ····· ...................................•.. 90 60 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 (!) z iii (/) < a. .... z w 0 ffi a. 107 0486 ~ HEPWOR'Jl+PAWLAK GE~HNJCAl. GRADATION TEST RESULTS Figure 4 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. TABLE 1 Job No. 107 0486 SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS Lot79 SAMPLE LOCATION NATURAL NATURAL GRADATION PERCENT ATIERBERG LIMITS UNCONANED DEPTH MOISTURE DRY GRAVEL SAND PASSING UQUID PlASTIC COMPRESSIVE SOIL OR BORING (feet) CONTENT DENS!lY NO. 200 UMIT INDEX STRENGTH BEDROa< TYPE (%) (%) SIEVE (ft) (%) (pcf) _(_%}_ ..!'& {PSFl 1 s 5.6 29 39 32 Silty sand and gravel fill I I ' I JUL-11-2008 01:57 F r om : PO Box8612 Aspen , CO 81612 970-963-4307 office 9 70·963-4304 rax Mtn-const@comcast .net Fax To: David Ba rtholomew Fax: 384-3470 Phone: 945·8212 ext 1610 Re: 1051 River Ben d Way 0 Urgent X For Review • Comments: David, To :3843470 Mountain Construction, Inc. From: Paul OiMento P:~~ges: 2 Date: August 25 , 20 08 ee: 0 Please Comment D Pleaso Reply D Please Recycle Please call with any questions or concerns . Paul 379-4180 to 'd .., ' "' ----~·.;/· r ..... .., I [fj-1--- L.,..J ; • 06869\LEO£ 'ON X~j ' • ' -. z j (L ~ :z: 1- 0 0 u_ ~ u w 0 ~NIH33NI~N3 NVW~Hnd WV 6\:60 3nl 8002-90-DO~ I I I COLORADO STATE ELECTRICAL BOARD INSPECTION REPORT I CORRECTION NOTICE Page I of I Date Received: 14-MAR-08 Permit Number: 640865 Contractor/HomeOwner: WALKER ELECTRIC I 051 River Bend Way Rough In Address: Type of Inspection: Action: Accepted Comments or Corrections: Meter release -OK Inspectors Name: Robert'Fuller Phone Number: 970 625-4561 Date: 14-MAR-08 COLORADO STATE ELECTRICAL BOARD DEPARTMENT OF REGULATORY AGENCIES 1580 logan St. Suite 550 Denver, Colorado 80203-1941 Phone:{303)894-2985 https:/lwww.dom.state.co.us/pls/reai!Ep _Web _Inspection_ GUI.Process _Page 4/10/2008 Parcel Detail Page 1 of3 Garfield County Assessor/Treasurer Parcel Detail Information Assessor/Treasurer Pro perty Search I Assessor Subset Query I Assessor Sales Search Clerk & Recorder Reception Search Basic Building Characteristics I Tax Information Parcel Detail I Value Detail I Sales Detail I Residential/Commercial Improvement Detail Land Detail I Photographs I Tax Area II Account Number II Parcel Number II Mill Levy I I 090 II R043463 II 239501429079 II 67.224 I Owner Name and Mailing Address IDIMEN TO, PAUL & LISA A I IPo Box 8612 I !ASP EN, CO 81612 I Legal Description lsEC T,TWN,RNG: 1-7-89 SUB:IRONBRIDGE IPUD , PHASE II, FILING I' 2 & 3 ILOT:79 PRE:R041512 BK :1596 PG:871 IBK:1565 PG:600 BK:1560 PG:438 IBK:1560 PG:431 BK:1057 PG:0745 IBK :1028 PG:768 BK:1028 PG:597 IBK:1006 PG:743 BK:1930 PG:827 IRECPT:724265 BK: 1930 PG :826 IRECPT:724264 BK: 1822 PG:287 IRECPT:702424 BK: 1822 PG:283 IRECPT :702422 BK: 1822 PG:250 IRECPT:702421 BK: 1782 PG:269 IRECPT:6944 79 BK: 1782 PG:264 IRECPT :6944 78 BK:1747 PG:1 IRECP T:686745 BK:I218 PG:738 IRECPT:572583 BK:1218 PG:715 http://www. garcoact.corn/assessor/parcel.asp ?ParcelN umber=23 9 50 14 29079 9/10/2007 Parcel Detail Page 2 of3 IRECPT:572582 BK: 1217 PG:266 IRECPT:572131 BK:l206 PG:852 IRECPT:569200 BK:l206 PG:780 IRECPT:569199 BK:1206 PG:768 IRECPT:569197 BK:l206 PG:734 IRECPT:569195 BK:1206 PG:662 IRECPT:569194 BK:l206 PG:637 IRECPT:569192 BK:1206 PG:629 I IRECPT:569191 BK:1206 PG:574 I IRECPT:569190 BK:l063 PG:0578 I IBK:l063 PG:0571 I Location Physica1 11051 RIVER BEND WAY GLENWOOD SPRINGS~ Address: I I Subdivision: IIIRONBRIDGE PUD, PHASE II, FILING 1, 2 & I I Land Acres: llo I Land Sq Ft: 1122,244 I I Section II Towns hiE II Range I 1 II 7 II 89 I Property Tax Valuation Information II Actual Value II Assessed Value I I Land: II 121,4loll 35,2101 I Improvements: II oil ol I Total: II 121,4loll 35,2101 Sale Date: lls/24/2007 Sale Price: 11338,800 Basic Building Characteristics Number of Residential lo I Buildings: Number of Commllnd 0 Buildings: No Building Records Found http://www .garcoact.com/assessor/parcel.asp ?ParcelN umber=23 9 50 14 29079 9/10/2007 Parcel Detai l Tax I n formation I Tax Year Tran saction Tn~e Amount I I 2006 Tax Payment: Second Half ($201.00)1 I 2006 Tax Payment: First Half ($201.00)1 I 2006 Tax Amount $402.ool To ofPa~ Assessor Database Search Options I Treasurer Database Search Options Clerk & Recorder Database earch Options Garfield County Home Pa~ Page 3 of3 The Garfie ld County Assessor and Treasurer's Offices make every effort to collect and maintain accurate data. However, Good Turns Software and the Garfield County Assessor and Treasurer's Offices are unable to warrant any of the information herein contained. Copyright © 2005 -2006 Good Turns Software. All Rights Reserved. Database & Web Design by Good Turns oftware. http://www. garcoact.cornlassessor/parcel .asp ?ParcelN umbe r=23 950 14 29079 9/10/2007 hu#c/A'~P-71/ ~~/ltf ¢nd //;~4/ /PI¥ec.!Ton5 ~~1ol ~//~5/f>~~ /t?f/ ~vcK'&-~ U/J?j APPROVED SUBJECT TO NOTED EXCEPTIONS & INSPECfiONS GARFIELD COUNTY B~DEP~NT o.te z ~ r By.,r_;~""""'-- LDCOPY NO INSPECTION WITIIOUT TIIESI PLANS ON SITE page of ro -- 00 - LOl '--- D T ~ 1 11/ , 1 qt-/Bo ~ ' /'2. f-liJ I , , -, - .. I ' \> /\ -\ 7 _1 1.. rY I T <:.: J r~ ; I<, I I< !C I ' \/ I I I ... -~ '["'/ •• /_ L -1\, I ___., I ( \ :::J ~ ~ " - ' ' hn-=n I I 3o;;@ i ' I I I I ' I --------I 1 JUL-11-2008 01:57 From: To:3843470 AUG-05-2008 TUE 09:19 AM FUHRMAN ENGINEERING FAX NO. 3037159890 0 c (./) _, 0 ~ ,.., 0 0 --i z G") " r )> z n.: •. 12'-0" ~··-0" F ___ !_o:~::;:___'" . ·-ff~·:.'" ,._,: r-~j:.-· .., ~--'r·- •--I ~' ·-' • • L _J ~ " I " r'-, · ·I -1!1 I l. .;4 •. / ,1,/ ' ., /. ~-·--.----.. ---- 10'-6" ____ ... _~t-~~ . N ,- o, ~ ' "· P. 03