HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication-PermitGarfield County No.
Building & Sanitation Department
108 8th Street, Suite #401 Glenwood Springs, Co. 81601
Office 945-8212 Inspection Line 384-5003
Job Address: Jewell lane, Silt
I I
Locality: Hunt Exemption,-Lot 1/2127-343-00-272 --------------~----~~----------------------------
Use of Building: s/f dwelling w/patios & attached garage
Owner: Gilstrap Properties LLLP
Amount of Permit: $1,972.33 __ ____;...:.;..:;._..::...;:_ __
septic $50.00
Total $2,022.33
~~L
Contractor: .R:otayi Stillman
---------------------~----------------~------.~ ~?1)7
-'---~b)::· Clerk:
------------~~----
Date:
GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION
108 8'" Street, Suite 401, GlenwOod Springs, CO 81601
Phone: 970-945·8212 I Fax: 970-384-3470 I Inspection Line: 970·384-5003
P~cel/Schedule No ~\~+-~LIZ)-()()-2.:1-~
A SEPARATE ELECTRICAL PERMIT IS REQUIRED AND MUST BE
ISSUED BY THE STATE OF COLORADO.
TinS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION
AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHLN l80 DAYS,. OR, IF
CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A
PERIOD OF 180 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFrER WORK IS COMMENCED.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE HEAD AND "EXAMINED THIS
APPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORREcT. ALL
PROVISIONS OF LAWS THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE
COM:PLETED WITHIN HEREIN OR NOT. THE
GRANTING OF A GIVE AUTHORl1Y
TO VIOLATE OR ANY OTHER Sf ATE OR
OR THE PERFORMANCE
o Remove
0 Site Plan
Adjusted
Fee: 3 3"
ll1:;-
Zoning:
Manu. Home:
AGREEMENT
PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO THE APPLICANT AS OWNER, CONTRACTOR AND/OR THE AGENT OF THE CONTRACTOR OR OWNER TO CONSTRUCT
THE STRUCTURE AS DETAILED ON PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SUBMIITED TO AND REVIEWED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTM&'IT.
IN CONSIDERATION OF THE ISSSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT, THE SIGNER HEREBY AGREES To COMPLY \VITH ALL BUILDING CODES AND LAND
USE REGULATIONS ADOPTED BY G~IELD COUNTI PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GWEN LN 30.28.201 CRS AS AMENDED. THE SIGNERFURTIIERAGREES
TIIAT IF THE ABOVE SAID ORDINANCES ARE NOT FULLY COMPILED WID-! IN THE LCOATION .. ERECTION, CONSTRUCTION, AND USE OF THE
ABOVE DESCRIBED STRUCTURE. THE PERMIT MAY BE REVOKEP BY NOTICE FROM THE COUN1Y AND THAT THEN AND THERE IT SHALL BECOME
NULL AND VOID. THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMT BASED UPON PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA SHALL NOT PREVENT THE BUILDING OFFICIAL
FROM TI~EREAFTER REQUIRING THE CORRECTION OF ERRORS IN SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA OR FROM PREVENTING
BillLDING OPERATION BEING CARRIED ON THEREUNDER WHEN IN VIOLATION OF THS CODE OR ANY OTHER ORDINANCE OR REGULATION OF
THIS JURISDICTION. TifE REVJJ,<.:W OF SUBMITIED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND INSPECTIONS CONDUCTED THEREAFTER DOES NOT CONSTITUTE
AN ACCEPTANCE OF ANY RESPONSIBILITIES OR LIABLITIES BY GARFIELD COUNTY FOR ERRORS, OMISSIONS OR DISCREPENCIES. THE RESPONSI
. BILI1Y FOR THESE ITEMS AND IMPLEMENTATION DURING CONSTRUCTION RESTS SPECIFICIALLYWITII THE ARTICTECT, DESIGNER, BUILDER,
AND OVVNER. COMMENTS ARE INTENDED TO BE· CONSERVATrvE AND ill SUPPORT OF THE OWNERS LNTEREST. ~ ~~<1 v\ II fee I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE AGREEMENT ABOVE (INITIAL), y-~\-CA-
c~~l-{)3
$116&4-6
The following items are required by Garfield County for a final inspection:
1. A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector;
2. Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department posted where readily
visible from access road;
3. A finished roof, a lockable house, complete exterior siding, exterior doors .and windows
installed, a complete kitchen with cabinets, a sink with hot & cold running water, non-absorbent
kitchen floor coverings, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove and refrigerator, all
necessary plumbing;
4. All bathrooms must be complete, with washbowl, tub or shower, toilet stool, hot and cold
running water, non-absorbent floors and walls finished and a privacy door;
5. All steps outside or inside over three (3) steps must have handrails, guard rails on balconies or
decks over 30" high constructed to all me and IRC requirements;
6. Outside grading done to where water will detour away from the building;
7. Exceptions to the outside steps, decks and grading may be made upon the demonstration of
extenuating circumstances, i.e. weather, but a Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until
all the required items are completed and a final inspection made;
· 8. A final inspection sign off by the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department for driveway
installation, where applicable; as well as any final sign off by the Fire District, and/or State
Agencies where applicable.
9. If you will be connecting to a public water and/or sewer system, 'proof of the tap fees have been
paid and the connections inspected by the service provider prior to issuance of a C.O.
A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE
ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED.
****A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY TAKE UPTO 5 BUSINESS DAYS TO BE
PROCESSED AND ISSUED.
****CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A CERTIFICATE OF
OCCUPANCY (C.O.) IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A
C.O. WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS
FOR VACATING PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET.
I understand and agree to abide by the above conditions for occupancy, use and the issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy for the dwelling under building permit# (X/] oq .
~ }o-/).\-o'l .
~ . .
Signature Date
Bpapplicationoctober2006
VALUATION FEE DETERMINATION
Applicant
Address
Date
.=G~il~str~a:J:p~P_:ro:;.~p~e!!rt!!:ie~s -------'"'---'-'Subdivision
:,le::,:w::,:e::,::ll~L::;:,n:;... ~--'---'---'"'---'"'--,-;_Lot/Block
..::1:;01.:::9:.:12::::0::_07:___.;_.;__.;__.;_--'-Contractor
Finished (Livable Area):
Main
Upper
Lower
Other
Total
Basement:
Unfinished
Square Feet
Valuation
Conversion of Unfinished to Finished
Total
Garage:
Valuation
Crawl Space
Valuation
Decks/ Patios
Valuation
Valuation
Covered
Open
Type of Construction:
Occupancy:
Valuation
Total Valuation
1298 sf
346 sf
sf
sf
1644 sf l\ '7 '(, c..<jf
sf
sf
545 sf J(£8 ,({f)
Commercial
sf
sf X
sf X
sf X
sf X
sf X
sf X
Hunt Exempt .
I
Royal· Stillman
122,773.92
0.00
9,810.00
0.00
0.00
135,235.92
GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING
970-945-8212
MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS
For
SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING CONSTRUCTION
Including
NEW CONSTRUCTION
ADDITIONS
ALTERATIONS
And
MOVED BUILDINGS
In order to understand the scope of the work intended under a permit application and expedite the
issuance of a permit it is important that complete information be provided. When reviewing a plan
and it's discovered that required information has not been provided by the applicant, this will result
in the delay of the permit issuance and in proceeding with building construction. The owner or
contractor shall be required to provide this information before the plan review can proceed. Other
plans that are in line for review may be given attention before the new information may be reviewed
after it has been provided to the Building Department.
Please review this document to determine if you have enough information to design your
project and provide adequate information to facilitate a plan review. Also, please consider
using a design professional for assistance in your design and a construction professional for
construction of your project. Any project with more than ten (10) occupants requires the
plans to be sealed by a Colorado Registered Design ProfessionaL
To provide for a more understandable plan in order to determine compliance with the building,
plumbing and mechanical codes, applicants are requested to review the following checklist prior to
and during design. Applicants are required to indicate appropriately and to submit the
completed checklist at time of application for a permit.
Plans to be included for a Building Permit, must be on drafting paper at least 18"x24" and
drawn to scale.
Plans must include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations all sides with
I
decks, balcony, steps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the finish grade line
and original grade. A section showing in detail, from the bottom of the footing to the top of the roof,
including re-bar, anchor bolts, pressure treated plates, floor joists, wall studs and spacing, insulation,
sheeting, house-rap, (which is required), siding or any approved building material. Engineered
foundations may be required.
A window schedule. A door schedule. A floor framing plan, a roof framing plan, roof must be
designed to withstand a 40 pound per square foot up to 7,000 feet in elevation, a 90 M.P.H. wind
speed, wind exposure B or C, and a 36 inch frost depth.
All sheets to be identified by number and indexed. All of the above requirements must be met or
your plans will be returned.
All plans submitted must be incompliance with the 2003 IRC.
1. Is a site plan included that identifies the location of the proposed structure or addition and
distances to the property lines from each corner of the proposed structure( s) prepared by
a licensed surveyor and has the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the
drawing? Properties with slopes of 30% or greater must be shown on the· site plan.
(NOTE Section: 106.2) Any site plan for the placement of any portion of a structure
within 50 ft. of a property line and not within a previously surveyed building envelope on
a subdivision final plat shall be prepared by a licensed surveyor and have the surveyor's
signature and professional stamp on the drawing. Any structure to be built within a
building envelope of a lot shown on a recorded subdivision plat shall include a copy of
the building envdope as it is shown on the final plat with the proposed structure located
within the envelope.
Yes. X
2. Does the site plan also include any other buildings on the property, setback easements and
utility easements? Please refer to Section 5.05.03 in the Garfield County Zoning Resolution
if the property you are applying for a building permit on is located on a comer lot. Special
setbacks do apply.
Yes X
3. Does the site plan include when applicable the location of the I.S.D.S. (Individual Sewage
Disposal System) and the distances to the property lines, wells (on subject property and
adjacent er9perties),strearris or water courses?
Y es. __ '--'y..._'--
4. Does the site plan indicate the location and direction of the County or private road accessing
the property?
2
Yes )(
5. Are you aware that prior to submittal of a building permit application you are required to
show proof of a driveway access pennit or obtain a statement from the Garfield County Road
& Bridge Department stating one is not necessary? You can contact the Road & Bridge
Department at 625-860 l.
Yes )(
6. Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all
reinforcing steel in accordance with the IRC or per stamped engineered design?
Yes >(
7. Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl
spaces and the clearances required between wood and earth?
Yes ·
8. Do the plans indicate the size and location of ventilation openings for the attic, roof joist
spaces and soffits?
Yes D(
9. Do the plans include design loads as required by Garfield County for roof snow loads, (a
minimum of 40 pounds per square foot up to & including 7,000 feet above sea level), floor
loads and AlJ.ld loads?
Y es __ _::l6,__::,_ __ _
I 0. Does. the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor, and roof
constructio~? /
Yes A ·---"--"----
II. Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists, wall studs, ceiling
~!:ts, roof xers or joists or trusses?
12. Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method of positive connection
of all colull1!\S /and beams?
Yes ___ -"-A_,_ __ _
13. Does the elevation plan .indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the
undisturbed grade to the midpointbetween the ridge and eave of a gable or shed roof or the
top of a flat roof? (Building height measurement usually not to exceed 25 feet)
Yes Y ·
14. Does the plan include any stove or zero clearance fireplace planned for installation including
3
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
make and model and Colorado Phase II certifications or phase II EPA certification?
Yes X No ·
Does the plan include a masonry fireplace including a fireplace section indicating design to
comply with the IRC?
Yes No __ ---''-.----
Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that egress/rescue windows
from sle~g rooms and/or basements comply with the requirements of the IRC?
Yes ~ No ______ _
Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that windows provide natural
light and ventilation for all habitable rooms?
Yes )( No ______ _
Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass doors,
glazing immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as
a walking surface; sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub enclosures
and specifY safety glazing for these areas?
Yes J( No ______ _
Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces, boilers and water heaters
indicated on the plan?
Yes . >( . No ______ _
Do you understand that if you are building on a parcel of land created by the exemption
process or the subdivision process, are building plans in compliance with all plat notes
and/or covenants?
Yes X No _____ _
Do you understand that if you belong to a Homeowners Association (HOA), it is your
responsibility to obtain written permission from the association, if required by that
association, prior to submitting an application for a building permit? The building
permit application will be accepted without it, but you run the risk o(the HOA bringing
action to enforce the covenants, which can result in revocation of permit issued.
Additionally, your Plan Review fee is not refundable if the plans have been reviewed by the
Building Department prior to any action by the HOA that requires either revocation or
substantial modification of the plans.
Yes :X"' No _____ _
Will this b::. m th;;, only residential structure on the parcel?
Yes ~ No Ifno-Explain: ______ _
Have t~2Jcomplete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the application?
Yes_~-=.L--=--
4
24. Do you understand that the minimum dimension a home can be on a lot is 20ft. wide and
20ft. long?. '\_..r
Yes ~ No ----~
25. Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other
construction code requirements?
Yes \><' No -----
26. Do your plans comply with all zoning rules and regulations in the County related to your
properties zone istrict?
Yes No _____ _
27. Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a final
inspection by the Garfield County Building Department?
Yes 'X No ____ _
28. Do you understand that approval for desi!,>n and/or construction changes are required prior
to the application of these changes?
Yes r:z(, No ____ ~_
29. Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a "Plan Review" fee from you
at the time of application submittal and that you will be required to pay the "Permit Fee" as
well as any "Road Impact" or "Septic System" fees required, at the time you pick up your
building ~l)llit?
Yes ·~ No _____ _
30. Are you aware that you must call iu for an inspection by 3:30 the business day before
the requested inspection in order to receive it the following business day? Inspections
will be made from 7:30a.m. to 3:30p.m. Monday through Friday. Inspections are to
be called in~~384-5003.
Yes /'---No --------'-
31. Are you aware that requesting inspections on work that is not ready or not accessible will
result in a__.$5~.00 re-inspection fee?
Yes _><__ No ________ _
32. Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the IRC
including approval on a final inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy and
occupanc~f he building?
Yes · No
-----~-
5
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
Are you aware that the Permit Application must be signed by the Owner or a written
authority being given for an Agent and that the party responsible for the project must comply
with the IRC? /
Yes ~ No __________ _
Do you understand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed Electrician
and Plumber to perform installations and hookups, unless you as the homeowner are
performing the work? The license number of the person performing the work will be
required at t~~of applicable inspection.
Yes ~ No _____________ _
Are you aware, that on the front of the Building Permit Application you will need to fill in
the Parcel/Schedule Number for the lot you are applying for this permit on prior to submittal
of a building pelJilit application? Your attention in this is appreciated.
Yes ____ -'<X.."--'~---
Do you know that the local fiXtrict may re.quire you. to submit plans for their review of
fire safety issues? Yes No (please check with the
building department about th'1s requirement)
Do you understand that if you are planning on doing any excavating or grading to the
property prior to issuance of a building permit that you will be required to obtain a grading
permit? :X
Yes --=----
Are you aware that if you will be connecting to a public water and/or sewer system, that the
tap fees have to be paid and the connections inspected by the service provider prior to the
~~~a_n_c_y,_.oe..f_a=:C_e_rt_ificate of Occupancy?
I hereby acknowled e that I have read, understand and answered these questions to the
be b' ·
Date
Phone: q'7o /f.pzs-~ asz (days); 0 17o ~0/G~ Ol(0l( (evenings)
Project Name: il C\lh t-Co(JIIfle Gt/'>.771.0/ e
Project Address: ,y w~ ( ( / >'fV'/'e_
Notes: If you have answered "No" on any of the questions, you may be required to provide this
6
information at the request of the Building Official prior to beginning the plan review process.
Delays in issuing the permit are to be expected. Work may not proceed without the issuance of a
permit. If it is determined by the Building Official that additional information is necessary to review
the application and plans to determine minimum compliance with the adopted codes, the application
may be placed behind more recent applications for building permits in the review process and not
reviewed until required information has been provided and the application rotates again to first
position for review, delay in issuance of the permit or delay in proceeding with construction.
Bpminreq November2006
7
SCHEDULE A
Order No.: 20071031
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
A tract of and, contained in the NWl/4 of the SWl/4 of Section 34, Township 5 South, Range 92 West of
the 6th P.M., more particularly described as follows:
Beginning at the West 1/4 Comer of said Section 34, thence along the northerly line of said NWl/4 of the
· SWl/4 South 87"30'13" East 1334.01 feet; thence along the easterly line of said NWl/4 of the SWl/4
South 00°03'04" West 362.38 feet; thence North 87°30' 13" West 408.09 feet; thence South 78"19'29"
West 439.66 feet; thence South 61 "54'32" West 556.69 feet to the westerly line of said NWl/4 of the
SWl/4, being within County-Road #259; thence along said westerly line and County Road #259 North
00"13'51" West 753.82 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
Also Known As
Lot 1
Hunt Exemption
According to the plat recorded January 21, 1997
As Reception No. 503618
County of Garfield
State of Colorado
ALTA Commitment (6117/06)-Schedule A
Page 2 of2
PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST
Applicant G,, \ '5 tn~ Date I 0 -&--o I
Building
~ngineered Foundation
riveway Permit
\'I;' \ {\IY, "*" urveyed Site Plan
~Septic Permit and Setbacks fl-"t..,
1/" Gradeffopography 30%
~tach Residential Plan Review List
__ j_M Minimum Application Questionnaire
~ubdivision Plat Notes
~ire Department Review
~ aluation Determination/Fees
LRed Line Plans/Stamps/Sticker
~Attach Conditions
-lL_Application Signed
_.l...L'Pian Reviewer To Sign Application
_L_Parcei/Schedule No.
~ 40# Snow load Letter-Manf. Hms. L Soils Report
GENERAL NOTES:
Planning/Zoning
~roperty Line Setbacks
~30ft Stream Setbacks
\/"Flood Plain
~ding Height
0ning Sign-off
~Road Impact Fees
_.LHOA!DRC Approval
Loradeffopography 40%
-I,..LYlanning Issues
~Subdivision Plat Notes
FAX
Number of Pages: 3 (including this cover sheet)
Date: d · ?-.-oCJ
TO: ~ ~ tt.-t-f'
FROM: A!l&jdcf ~ .t?I.P K J 1tko@ If~~
FAX#: b:Z5"·D17 7 @1.£'-/b<i/6
Comments: v/J ;, ~ ~ ~td
' ~ i do~. AJ/tal~ce.-m~
~/11M-e. . .-f4_~ ~ ~~.
ft)~t:£/~zk ~ .~·~ .
. ---de~ ~f --i~ -+Rc !/~
~~~~hJ, ~~~
~'}714· edt~ ~ /Cui
Garfield County B ilding & Planning Department
108 ~Street, Suite 401
. 81601
CORRECTION NOTICE:
0480 CR 259, Permit# 10709
1) See Attached "The following items are required by Garfield County for a final
inspection.
2) Specific items noted in inspection today;
a) Post at driveway for address numbers.
b) Front entry needs to be completed
c) No garage door
d) Deck at sliding door in master bedroom
e) Install all covers on furnace.
3) This may or may not be a complete list. If the inspector who is at the project at
the time of the final inspection finds other items then they will have to be corrected.
1-1--ar
The following items are required by Garfield County for a final inspection:
1. A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector;
2. Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department posted where readily
visible from access road;
3. A finished roof, a lockable house, complete exterior siding, exterior doors .and windows
installed, a complete kitchen with cabinets, a sink with hot & cold running water, non-absorbent
kitchen floor coverings, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove and refrigerator, all
necessary plumbing;
4. All bathrooms must be complete, with washbowl, tub or shower, toilet stool, hot and cold
running water, non-absorbent floors and walls finished ·and a privacy door;
5. All steps outside or inside over three (3) steps must have handrails, guard rails on balconies or
decks over 30" high constructed to all IBC and IRC requirements;
6. Outside grading done to where water will detour away from the building;
· 7. Exceptions to the outside steps, decks and grading may be made upon the demonstration of
extenuating circumstances, i.e. weather, but a Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until
all the required items are completed and a final inspection made;
· 8. A final inspection sign off by the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department for driveway
installation, where applicable; as well as any final sign off by the Fire District, and/or State
Agencies where applicable .
. 9. If you will be connecting to a public water and/or sewer system, 'proof of the tap fees have been
paid and the connections inspected by the service provider prior to issuance of a C.O.
A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE
ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED.
****A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY TAKE UP TO 5 BUSINESS DAYS TO BE
PROCESSED AND ISSUED.
****CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A CERTIFICATE OF
OCCUPANCY (C.O.) IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A
C.O. WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS
FOR VACATING PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET.
I understand and agree to abide by the above conditions for occupancy, use and the issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy for the dwelling under building permit # IT;~ 0°\ .
~ }O-~t-o7
Signature Date
Bpapplicationoctober2006
(continue on back)
r ;
;~ ~
-W 'ti.
,,.;: ,., ·-HEQ ;·'OR
BUILDING PERMIT
GARFIELD COUpjTY, COLORADO
Date Issued./O.}acJ./Q1 .. zoned Area ..•........•.•.......•••.•.•.•. Permit No .. /Q.7.(tt.. .......... .
AGREEMENT
In conside_ration of the issuance of this permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with all
laws and regulations related to the zoning, location; construction and erection of the proposed
structure for which this permit is granted, and further agrees that if the above said regulations
are uot fully complied with in the zoning, location, erection and construction of the above
described structure, the permit may then be revoked by notice from the County Building
Inspector and IMMEDIATELY BECOME NULL AND VOID.
. ·-~.-?}?,~{.f "VlCi' J!
Setbacks Front Side Side Rear
1bis Card MusrBe'Posted So "It is ·pJaJ~·.ry ViSJble From·rne-street·until Final Inspection. ·
INSPECTION RECORD
Foundation .
and Windows
ALL LISTED ITEMS MUST BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE COVERING -
WHETHER INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR, UNDERGROUND OR ABOVE GROUND.
TIDS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE
APPROVED
Date /OJi!'ffo?av?tfi!Ji~~ti"k \.ufi <'
1 IJF PLACED SIDE-co';r1~ CLEAR PLASTIC
COUNTY OF GARFIELD -BUILDING DEPARTMENT
CORRECTION NOTICE
108 8th St., Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado
Phone (970) 945-8212
Job located at D4-g 0 c:r;:c weLL L../1/;
Permit No. _ ___,_/,--.JL_t1_7,_· _,C~cL__ ________ _
I have this day inspected this structure and these
premises and found the following corrections needed:
~I for Re-lnspection $A/?&£R.....
0 $50.00 Re-lnspection Fee must be paid prior to Re-lnspection
You are hereby notified that the above correction must be inspected
before covering.
When correction(s) have been made, call for inspection at 970-384-5003.
Date f?'--z 9
Building Inspector
Phone (970) 945-8212
COUNTY OF GARFIELD -BUILDING DEPARTMENT
CORRECTION NOTICE
108 8th St., Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado
Phone (970) 945-8212
Job located at 0 <1-8 0 _:::r;;;: cv ~ c { ~
Permit No. /cl 7 CY ?
I have this day inspected this structure and these
1~.. premises and found the following corrections needed:
I\ /$-lfmA..v.A~ AVOtS'1ffSS &:i.eQs AS.s~
,(!JAK SM/£.. &5€ 7-%. ~ YAK_,Y No /11~6:£--
VIA/ 3d' J5£7h'/-e/£/V ..sr,;:q/K.s= ..
\
S/NLC .!..!?AK /d MA..:Vdte !3""77/
\ z;f/L./CTS /VIz_,e=p .5> /CAL. IZ: e . ....S/hw£«...
\\ /'(/<'At="/ /7/(;C/{ CA/11/1/0! 7}/£ £)(~5/cp
\ CMwL"~c£ A/££1/5 VAa,IC
, 75AI(I(;e£ +-/ /I/.54'L-AZ7&/I/ *
\ AP,OI(Jf:Ss /lfA;::{ol(_ C6A/'rt7AVI/.5A zZaAi.
'~ c.o, 1?4!: 7/?c.75~>,
\ ;(/£££/ .sc;f'e&<Ai I LV ~C( /L_ oa
&Mo~ CAr' ~1"1 fCZctfit/3//JG:--
~for Re-lnspection //£./ ;;;-::---
0 $50.00 Re-lnspection Fee must be paid prior to Re-lnspection
You are hereby notified that the above correction must be inspected
before covering.
When correction(s) have been made, call for inspection at 970-384-5003.
Date cZ'-7 20 J2...L__
Building Inspector ~ W~
Phone (970) 945-8212 '
5')3 ~.,+A~
(KJ'le.. 91 'SC)
CTL/THOMPS0N, INCw
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
C.bvf'5cr(!Q ci-L~pj-.
~-
Giico Companies
Gilco, Inc. • GTI • Gilstrap Enterprise
KEITH GILSTRAP
Cell: (970) 618-0484
Office: (970) 625-0797
Fax: (970) 625-1686
P.O. Box 1061
Rifle, CO 81650
kdgilco@yahoo.com
Prepared For:
MR. JOHN P. CARDINALE
348 East Vista Drive
Silt, CO 81652
Job No. GS-3897
May 23, 2003
CTL!THOMPSON, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
234 GENTER DRIVE • GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81601 • 1970) 945-2809
l
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SCOPE
SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS
SITE CONDITIONS
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION
GEOLOGIC CONDITIONS
Flash Flooding and Debris/Mud Flow
Radiation
SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS
SITE PREPARATION AND EARTHWORK
FOUNDATION
FLOOR SYSTEMS AND SLABS-ON-GRADE
PERGOLA TION TESTING
SURFACE DRAINAGE .
LIMITATIONS
FIGURE 1 -APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS
-·· ..
FIGURE 2-SUMMARY LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORING
FIGURES 3 AND 4-SWELL/CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS
FIGURE 5 -INTERIOR FOUNDATION WALL DRAIN
FIGURES 6 THROUGH 11-PERCOLATION REST RESULTS
FIGURE 12-FILL PAD CROSS SECTION
TABLE I -SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
MR. JOHN P. CARDINALE
NINA'S EXEMPTION, LOTS 1 AND 2 OF
HUNT EXEMPTION, LOT 1
CTUT GS-3897
1
1
2
2
3
3
3
4
5
6
7
9
9
10
.SCOPE;
This report presents the results of our soils and foundation investigation for
Nina's Exemption, Lots 1 and 2 of the Hunt Exemption, Lot 1 in Garfield County,
Colorado. A single family residence is to be constructed on each lot. We conducted
the investigation to evaluate the subsurface conditions at the site and provide
foundation recommendations for the proposed buildings. Our report was prepared
from data developed during our field exploration, laboratory testing, engineering
analysis and our experience with similar conditions. This report includes a
description of the subsurface conditions found in our exploratory borings, our
opinions and recommendations for design criteria for recommended foundation and
floor systems, and geotechnical and construction criteria for details influenced by
the subsoils. The recommendations contained in this report were developed based
on our understanding of the construction as currently planned. If plans will differ
significantly from the descriptions contained herein, we should be contacted to
adjust our recommendations as necessary. A summary of our conclusions is
presented below.
SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS
1. Subsurface conditions in our exploratory borings consisted of a
surficial layer of organic sandy clay "topsoil" above sandy clays
underlain by clayey sands. The clayey sands were underlain by
gravels at our TH-3 location. Free ground water was found at 3 feet
in our TH-1, TH-2 and Profile 1 and at 4 feet in our TH-3 at the time of
drilling.
2. We recommend the residences be constructed on building pads
elevated above the adjacent ground. The top of the building pad
should be at least 3 feet above the existing ground surface.
3. The residences can be founded on footings placed on "stabilized"
sandy clays and clayey sands. See SITE PREPARATION AND
EARTHWORK and FOUNDATION sections.
MR. JOHN P. CARDINALE
NINA'S EXEMPTION, LOTS 1 AND 2 OF
HUNT EXEMPTION, LOT 1
. CTUT GS~-3897 1
4. We judge potential differential movement of slabs-on-grades
supported by densely compacted structural fill will be low.
5. Surface drainage should be designed to provide for rapid removal of
surface water away from the residences.
SITE CONDITIONS
Nina's Exemption Lots 1 and 2 are located in the Silt Mesa area of Garfield
County, Colorado. Jewel Lane is alqng the west property boundary. A high voltage
transmission line and irrigation canal are along the north property boundary. Lot 1
is to the west of Lot 2. The site has been used for irrigated pasture.· Ground
surfaces are comparatively flat with gentle grades down to the south at less than 4
percent. Several small irrigation ditches (1 to 2 feet deep and several feet wide)
cross the site. A stock pond approximately 75 feet by 50 feet is in the south central
part of the site. An incised drainage on the order of 4 or 5 feet deep trends down to
the southeast across the site between Lots 1 and 2. Vegetation consists of grasses
and weeds with some brush and small trees along the drainage sides.
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION
We were told that one or two story wood frame single family residences are
to be built. No basements are planned. The lower level floors may be constructed
as slabs-on-grade or living area floors may be structurally supported by the
foundation with crawl space below. Foundation loads are expected to vary between
1,000 and 2,500 pounds per lineal foot of foundation wall with maximum interior
column loads of 20 kips. We anticipate maximum excavation depths on the order of
3 feet deep to install foundations and utilities. Excavations below ground water are
not recommended. If the construction will differ significantly from the descriptions
MR. JOHN P. CARDINALE
NINA'S EXEMPTION, LOTS 1 AND 2 OF
HUNT EXEMPTION, LOT 1
CTUT GS-3897 2
above, we should be informed so that we can provide new recommendations and/or
design criteria, if necessary.
GEOLOGIC CONDITIONS
The site is situated in a broad low lying valley at the south flanks of the Grand
Hogback. The site is underlain by undifferentiated surficial deposits of Quaternary
aged alluvium and colluvium. These surficial deposits consist of sandy clays and
clayey sands with gravel lenses. The soils were deposited by debris/mud flow and
sheetwash from the Grand Hogback to the north.
Flash Flooding and Debris/Mud Flow
The drainage that crosses the site is subject to periodic flash floods and
debris/mud flows. We qualitatively rate the degree of risk from flash flooding and
debris/mud flow as moderate. We believe flash flood and/or mud flows on the order
of 1 to 2 feet deep can be expected. Mitigation can be with site grading to ensure
channelization and conveyance offlash flood and debris/mud fiow around and away
from the proposed residences. In addition, the site has ground water near the ground
surface that can be expected to raise to the ground surface during the irrigation
season or during periods of high precipitation. We recommend the residences be
placed on building pads elevated above the adjacent ground. We recommend the top
of the building pad elevation be at least 3 feet above existing grade. The elevation
should also be at least 2 feet above the 100 year flood elevation.
Radiation
We performed a radiation screening of the site. Our screening involved
obtaining spot readings at and around our exploratory boring locations.
Measurements were taken with a Ludlum Instruments, Inc. Model No. 19 Micro·R·
MR. JOHN P. CARDINALE
NINA'S EXEMPTION, LOTS 1 AND 2 OF
HUNT EXEMPTION, LOT 1
CTL!T GS-3897 3
Meter. Measurements were taken from the various soils occurring at the site. Our
measurements ranged from 11 to 15 microroentgens per hour. Our experience
indicates these measurements are consistent with normal background radiation in
the region and are not cause for concern.
SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS
Subsurface conditions at the site were investigated by drilling four (4)
exploratory borings, two (2) profile borings and six (6) percolation borings with an
all-terrain drill rig at the approximate locations shown on Figure 1. Drilling was
directed by our engineering geologist who logged the soils encountered in the
borings and obtained samples. Samples obtained in the field were returned to our
laboratory where field classifications were checked and typical samples selected for
testing. Graphic logs of the soils encountered in our exploratory borings are shown
on Figure 2.
Our exploratory borings penetrated a 1 foot thick surficial layer of organic
sandy clay "topsoil" above 1 to 5 feet of soft to very soft, moist to wet, sandy clays
above loose to very loose, wet clayey sands. The sands were underlain by dense to
very dense, wet, silty to sandy gravels with cobbles at 16 feet deep in our TH-3. Free
ground water was found 3 feet deep at our TH-1, TH-2 and Profile 1 locations and at
4 feet deep at our TH-3 location at the time of drilling. Three samples of the soils
were selected for Atterberg limit and percent passing the No. 200 sieve. A sample
of sandy clay had a liquid limit of 25 percent, plasticity index of 12 percent and 70
percent silt and clay size particles. A sample ofthe clayey sand had a liquid limit of
19 percent, a plasticity index of 6 percent and 37 percent silty and clay sized
particles. Laboratory test results are presented on Figures 3 and 4.summarized on
Table I.
MR. JOHN P. CARDINALE
NINA'S EXEMPTION, LOTS 1 AND 2 OF
HUNT EXEMPTION, LOT 1
CTUT GS-3897 4
SITE PREPARATION AND EARTHWORK
Excavations at this site should be limited to approximately 1 foot above the
water table. We envision site preparation will consist of stripping the surficial-
"topsoil" layer approximately 1 foot deep and constructing a fill pad with a finished
surface elevation at least 3 feet higher than existing grade (see Figure 12). Irrigation
ditches should be obliterated or rerouted to prevent surface drainage from being
directed towards the buildings or fill pads. Excavations for the foundation and
utilities can be accomplished using conventional, heavy-duty excavation equipment.
Excavation sides will need to be sloped or braced to meet local, state and federal
safety regulations. We believe the clays will classify as Type B soils and the sands
-as Type C based on OSHA standards governing excavations. Temporary slopes
above ground water should be no steeper than 1 to 1 (horizontal to vertical) in Type
B soils and no steeper than 1.5 to (horizontal to vertical) in Type C soils.
Excavations below ground water can be expected to slough and flatten at 4 to 1
_(horizontal to vertical) or flatter.
Soils removed from an excavation should not be stockpiled at the edge of the
· excavation. We recommend the excavated soils be placed at a distance from the top
of the excavat.ion equal to at least the depth of the excavation.
We recommend the residences be placed on building pads elevated above the
adjacent ground. We recommend the top of the building pad elevation be at least 3
feet above existing grade. The elevation should also be at least 2 feet above the 100
year flood elevation. The fill should extend horizontally at least 5 feet beyond the
building footprints. Fill may .be needed outside of the building pads to achieve
subgrade elevations for access drives and exterior concrete flatwork. Areas to
receive fill or bear slabs-on-grade should be stripped of vegetation, topsoil or other
deleterious materials. The resulting surface should be moisture conditioned and
compacted. Soft areas can be stabilized as discussed below.
MR. JOHN P. CARDINALE
NINA'S EXEMPTION, LOTS 1 AND 2 OF
HUNT EXEMPTION, LOT 1
CTL!T GS-3897 5
Fill can consist ofthe on site clays and sands free of organics, debris or other
deleterious materials. We suggest the owner consider importing a granular fill such
as a "3 inch minus pit run" to construct the building pads. Our experience is that it
is easer to achieve the desired moisture content and density with the granular soils.
Fill should be placed in maximum 8 inch thick loose lifts at 2 percent below to 2
percent above optimum moisture content. Structural fill below floor slabs should be
compacted to at least 98 percent of standard Proctor maximum dry density (ASTM
D 698). Fill placed outside the building footprints should be compacted to at least 95
percent of ASTM D 698. Placement and compaction of fill should be observed and
tested by a representative of our firm during construction.
The recommended foundation is footings on "stabilized" soils (see
FOUNDATION section). The clays can be stabilized by crowding 8 to 12 inch
diameter rock into the soft soils to develop a firm surface on which to place footings
or below slab fill.
Free ground water was found in our exploratory borings at 3 to 4 feet below
the existing ground surface during our field investigation. Depending upon cut
depths and the time of year water will likely be present and enter excavations at this
site. If free ground water is encountered, we recommend excavations be sloped to
sumps where water can be removed by pumping.
FOUNDATION
Our exploratory borings penetrated soft to very soft clays and loose to very
loose clayey sands at footing elevations. Footings should not be placed on these
soft or loose soils. The buildings can be founded with footings bearing on the
"stabilized" soils as discussed above under SITE PREPARATION and EARTHWORK.
Footings bearing on the stabilized soils may experience 1 inch of total settlement
MR. JOHN P. CARDINALE
NINA'S EXEMPTION. LOTS 1 AND 2 OF
HUNT EXEMPTION, LOT 1
CTLIT GS-3897 6
and differential settlement of about Y, of the actual total settlement. Footings for the
building can be designed and constructed with the following criteria.
1. Footings on stabilized soils (see SITE PREPARATION and
EARTHWORK) can be designed for a maximum allowable soil bearing
pressure of 500 psf. Material loosened during the excavation or
forming process should be removed from footing areas or compacted
prior to placing concrete.
2. Continuous wall footings should have a minimum width of at least 24
inches. Foundations for isolated columns should have minimum
dimensions of 30 inches by 30 inches. Larger sizes may be required,
depending upon foundation loads.
3. Grade beams and foundation walls should be well reinforced, top and
bottom, to span undisclosed loose or soft soil pockets. We
recommend reinforcement sufficient to span an unsupported distance
of at least 12 feet. Reinforcement should be designed by the structural
engineer considering the effects of lateral loads .on wall performance.
4. The soils under exterior footings should be protected from freezing.
We recommend the bottom of footings be constructed at a depth of at
least 36 inches below finished grades for frost protection. The local
building department should be consulted to verify the required depth.
6. The completed foundation excavation should be inspected by a
representative of our firm prior to placing forms to confirm that
subsoils are as anticipated and suitable for support of designed
footings.
7. Backfill along foundation walls and should be moisture conditioned
and compacted .
. FLOOR SYSTEMS AND SLABS-ON-GRADE
Because of the presence of ground water near the ground surface and the risk
of damp or wet crawl space conditions we recommend slab-on-grade floors. Based
on our laboratory test data and our experience, we believe slab-on-grade
construction can be supported by densely compacted, structural fill built with the on-
MR. JOHN P. CARDINALE
NINA'S EXEMPTION, LOTS 1 AND 2 OF
HUNT EXEMPTION, LOT 1
CTUT GS.3897 7
site soils or imported granular material with low risk of differential movement and
associated damage. Performance of slab-on-grade floors will likely be good,
provided the subgrade soils below slabs are compacted with a heavy, sheepsfoot
compactor prior to concrete placement. If fill below floor slabs is not constructed
with a granular material then we recommend a 4 inch thick layer of 3/4 inch diameter
washed rock below floor slabs to break capillary rise of ground water. To reduce the
accumulation of water, we recommend the below slab drain gravel be incorporated
into an interior foundation wall drain. The drain should consist of a 4-inch diameter
open joint or slotted PVC pipe encased in "free draining gravel" such as 3/4 inch
diameter washed concrete aggregate. The drain should lead to a positive gravity
outfall or a sump to be mechanically pumped. A typical foundation drain detail is
shown on Figure 5.
We recommend the following precautions for slab-on-grade construction at
this site. These precautions will not prevent movement from occurring, they tend to
reduce damage if slab movement occurs.
1. Slabs should be separated from exterior walls and interior bearing
members with a slip joint which allows free vertical movement of the
slabs.
2. Underslab plumbing should be eliminated where feasible. Where such
plumbing is unavoidable, it should be pressure tested for leaks before
the slab is constructed. Plumbing and utilities which pass through
slabs should be isolated from the slabs .. Gas and water lines leading
to slab-supported appliances should be provided with flexible
couplings.
3. Exterior patio and porch slabs should be isolated from the building.
These slabs should be well-reinforced to function as independent
units. Movements of these slabs should not be transmitted to the
residence foundations.
4. Frequent control joints should be provided to reduce problems
associated with shrinkage and curling. Our experience indicates
panels which are approximately square generally perform better than
rectangular areas. We advocate use of an additional joint about 3 feet
away from and parallel to foundation walls.
MR. JOHN P. CARDINALE
NINA'S EXEMPTION, LOTS 1 AND 2 OF.
HUNT EXEMPTION, LOT 1
CTUT GS~3897 8
kfl L.. . I
PERCOLATION TESTING
We performed percolation testing in the three (3) percolation borings on each
lot at the approximate locations shown on Figure 1. Our percolation borings were
each approximately 3 feet deep and bottomed in sandy clays or clayey sands.
Summary logs of our profile borings and percolation borings are shown on Figure
2. We pre-soaked our percolation borings for 1 day prior to performing our
percolation tests. Standing water from the pre-soaking was in our percolation
borings P-1, P-2, P-4 and P-5 after approximately 24 hours. No standing water from
the pre-soaking was in percolation borings P-3 or P-6 after approximately 24 hours.
Percolation test results are shown on Figures 6 through 11. Our percolation testing
resulted in percolation rates that varied between 5 min/inch and 20 min/inch. State
and County Regulation require that in cases where ground water is within 8 feet of
the ground surface the septic system be designed by a professional engineer
qualified in septic system design.
SURFACE DRAINAGE
Surface drainage is critical to the performance offoundations, floor slabs and
concrete flatwork. We recommend the following precautions be observed during
construction and maintained at all times after the residence is completed:
1. Wetting or drying of the open foundation excavation ,should be
avoided.
2. The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the buildings should
be sloped to drain away from the buildings in all directions. We
recommend providing a slope of at least 12 inches in the first 10 feet
around the buildings, where possible. In no case should the slope be
less than 6 inches in the first 5 feet.
3. Backfill around the exterior of foundation walls should be moisture
conditioned to within 2 percent of optimum moisture content and
MR. JOHN P. CARDINALE
NINA'S EXEMPTION, LOTS 1 AND 2 OF
HUNT EXEMPTION, LOT 1
CTLIT GS-3897 9
compacted to at least 95 percent of standard Proctor (ASTM D 698)
maximum dry density.
4. Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits
of all backfill. Splash blocks and downspout extensions should be
provided at all discharge points. We specifically recommend against
burying downspout discharge pipes because it increases the potential
for subsurface wetting near the foundation.
5. Landscaping should be carefully designed to m1mm1ze irrigation.
Plants used near foundation walls should be limited to those with low
moisture requirements; irrigated grass should not be located within 5
feet of the foundation. Sprinklers should not discharge within 5 feet
of the foundation and should be directed away from the buildings.
LIMITATIONS
Our exploratory borings were located to obtain a reasonably accurate picture
of subsurface conditions. Variations in the subsurface conditions. not indicated by
our borings will occur. We should observe the completed foundation excavations·
to confirm the soils are as anticipated from our exploratory borings and suitable for
support of the designed footings.
Our report was based on conditions disclosed by our exploratory borings,
· engineering analysis and our experience. Criteria presented reflect our
understanding of the proposed construction. We should be advised if construction
plans differ significantly from the descriptions herein to permit us to re-evaluate our
conclusions and recommendations.
This investigation was conducted in a manner consistent with that level of
care and skill ordinarily exercised by engineering geologists and geotechnical
engineers currently practicing under similar conditions in the locality of this project.
No other warranty, express or implied, is made. If we can be of further service in
MR. JOHN P. CARDINALE
NINA'S EXEMPTION, LOTS 1 AND 2 OF
HUNT EXEMPTION, LOT 1
CTUT GS-3897 10
discussing the contents of this report or in the analysis of the influence of the
subsoil conditions on the design of the structure, please call.
MR. JOHN P. CARDINALE
NINA'S EXEMPTION, LOTS 1 AND 2 OF
HUNT EXEMPTION, LOT 1
CTUT GS-3897 11
SCALE: 1'= 1 00'
Mr. John P. Cardinale
....... ~-
Job No. GS-3897
TH-2
•
TH-1 • I
Profile 1 e •L
• I e P-2.
P-3
Approximate
Locations of
Exploratory
Borings
Fig. 1
15
20
LEGEND:
10'1 ~
Job No. GS-3897
'• '·
Organic sandy eta·
vegetation, soft, n
(OL)
Clay, sandy, soft ,
to wet. brown. ( c·
Sand, clayey, loos
wet, brown. (SC)
Gravel, silty to sa
dense to very del
{GM, GP)
15
20
Exploratory borings were drilled on
April 25, 2003 with 4-inch diameter,
continuous flight auger and a
truck-mounted drill rig.
These ·exploratory borings are subject
to the explanations, limitations and
conclusions as contained in this report.
Fig. 2
f,
~:
z
' ..
:•)
<
~
If.•
~·
\
z
0 en z
<(
ll.
~
'if.
z
0 en .en w
l:t::
ll. :;:
0
0
6
..
5
!
4
3
2
0
-1
~ ~
""' -2 '\
.\
·3 . i\
\ ~c ; lVI\.. VC: lVII !f 'ETOWE TTINI 3
-4
-5
-6
/
~ ' i "'
-7
-8
: 'b
: !\
••
' . ' . 1\.j : i i i
•
: . : '' !
' . . ' ' . ' '
• • •
•
i I : '
-9 •
0.1 1.0 100
APPLIED PRESSURE -KSF
Sample of SAND, CLAYEY (SC)
From TH-2 AT 3 FEET
JOB NO. GS-3897
NATURAL DRY UNIT WEIGHT=
NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT=
102 PCF
24.6 %
Swell Consolidation
Test Results FIG. 3
SLOPE
PER REPORT
I
~BACKFILL4 (COMPOSffiON AND
COMPACTION PER REPORT)
BELOW GRADE WALL
REINFORCING STEEL
PER STRUCTURAL
DRAWINGS
FOOTING OR PAD
ENCASE PIPE IN WASHED CONCRETE
AGGREGATE (ASTM C33, NO. 57
67). EXTEND GRAVEL LATERALLY TO
VOID (WHERE APPLICABLE) AND TO
BOTIOM OF SLAB-ON-GRADE FLOOR.
Job No. GS-3897
NOTE:
DRAIN SHOULD BE AT LEAST 4 INCHES
BELOW BOTIOM OF FOOTING AT THE
HIGHEST POINT AND SLOPE DOWNWARD
TO A POSITIVE GRAVITY OUTLET OR TO
A SUMP WHERE WATER CAN BE
REMOVED BY PUMPING.
PROVIDE POSITIVE SLIP JOINT
BETWEEN SLAB AND WALL.
FLOOR SLAB
... :
8'' MINIMUM L
OR BEYOND 1:1
SLOPE FROM BOTIOM
OF FOOTING.
~· . . ........
(WHICHEVER IS GREATER)
4-INCH DIAMETER PERFORATED
DRAIN PIPE. THE PIPE SHOULD
BE LAID IN A TRENCH WITH A
MINIMUM 1/8 INCH AND 1 /4 INCH
DROP PER FOOT OF DRAIN.
Interior
Foundation
Wall Drain
1
4"
T
Fig. 5
SATURATION AND PREPARATION PERCOLATION TEST
DATE: 04/30/03 DATE: 05/01/03
TIME AT START OF SATURATION: 12:00 pm WATER IN BORING AFTER 24 HOURS
X YES NO
PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS
West Site (Site #1)
DEPTH TO WATER
HOLE DEPTH TIME AT TIME CHANGE PERGOLA-
NUMBER (INCHES) START OF INTERVAL IN WATER TION RATE
~ INTERVAL (MINUTES) START OF END OF DEPTH (MIN/INCH)
INTERVAL INTERVAL (INCHES)
(INCHES) (INCHES)
P-1 38 1:00 15 1a.o 23.75 5.75 3
1:15 15 11.25 1a.75 7.5 2
1:30 15 18.75 23.5 4.75 3
1:45 15 23.5 25.5 2.0 8
2:00 15 25.5 27.5 2.0 a
2:15 15 14.75 20.5 5.75 3
2:30 15 20.5. 24.0 3.5 4
2:45 15 24.0 26.5 2.5 6
3:00 15 26.5 27.5 1.0 15
3:15 15 27.5 29.5 2.0 a
3:30 15 29.5 31.0 1.5 10
3:45 15 1a.5 21.5 3.0 5
4:00 15 21.5 23.0 1.5 10
4:15 15 23.0 24.0 1.0 15
4:30 15 24.0 25.25 1.25 12
I
I
Job No. GS-3897 Fig. 6
SATURATION AND PREPARATION PERCOLATION TEST
DATE: 04/30/03 DATE: 05101103
TIME AT START OF SATURATION: 12:00 pm WATER IN BORING AFTER 24 HOURS
X YES NO
f I West Site (Site #1)
PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS
! ' 1
I !; '
i;
~
i ! ~
' " ' tO
i
I
I
HOLE DEPTH
NUMBER (INCHES)
P-2 39
Job No. GS-3897
TIME AT TIME
START OF INTERVAL
INTERVAL (MINUTES)
1:00 15
1:15 15
1:30 15
1:45 15
2:00 15
2:15 15
2:30 15
2:45 15
3:00 15
3:15 15
3:30 15
3:45 15
4:00 15
4:15 15
4:30 15
DEPTH TO WATER
CHANGE
IN WATER
START OF END OF DEPTH
INTERVAL INTERVAL (INCHES)
(INCHES) (INCHES)
15.5 20.75 5.25
10.25 15.75 5.5
15.75 21.25 5.5
21.25 23,75 2.5
23.75 25.25 1.5
25.25 26.5 1.25
26.5 27.5 1.0
19.75 22.75 3.0
22.75 23.75 1.0
23.75 25.75 2.0
25.75 26.5 0.75
26.5 27.5 1.0
27.5 28.75 1.25
28.75 29.5 0.75
29.5 30.25 0.75
PERGOLA-
TION RATE
(MIN/INCH)
3
3
3
7
10
12
15
5
15
8
20
15
12
20
20
Fig. 7
SATURATION AND PREPARATION
DATE: 04/30/03
TIME AT START OF SATURATION: 12:00 pm
PERCOLATION TEST
DATE: 05/01/03
WATER IN BORING AFTER 24 HOURS
YES X NO
PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS
West Site (Site #1)
DEPTH TO WATER
HOLE DEPTH TIME AT TIME CHANGE
NUMBER (INCHES) START OF INTERVAL IN WATER
INTERVAL (MINUTES) START OF END OF DEPTH
INTERVAL INTERVAL (INCHES)
. (INCHES) (INCHES)
P-3 42.0 1:00 15 21.25 24.5 3.25
1:15 15 8.5 19.0 10.5
1:30 15 19.0 24.0 5.0
1:45 15 10.75 20.75 10.0
2:00 15 20.75 24.25 3.5
2:15 15 11.25 21.0 9.75
2:30 15 21.0 24.5 3.5
2:45 15 18.25 23.75 5.5
3:00 15 12.5 20.5 8.0
3:15 15 20.5 24.0 3.5
3:30 15 24.0 25.25 1.25
3:45 15 25.25 26.5 1.25
4:00 15 26.5 . 28.25 1.75
4:15 15 28.25 30.0 1.75
4:30 15 20.25 23.25 3.0
Job No. GS-3897
PER COLA-
TIONRATE
· (MIN/INCH)
5
1
3
2
4
2
4
3
2
4
12
12
9
9
5
Fig. 8
f
I [:
\
DATE: 04/30/03
TIME AT START OF SATURATION: 12:00 pm
DATE: 05/01/03
SATURATION AND PREPARATION PERCOLATION TEST
WATER IN BORING AFTER 24 HOURS
X YES NO
PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS
East Site (Site #2)
["' DEPTH TO WATER
i HOLE DEPTH TIME AT TIME CHANGE PERGOLA-
I NUMBER (INCHES) START OF INTERVAL IN WATER TION RATE
I INTERVAL (MINUTES) START OF END OF DEPTH (MIN/INCH)
I INTERVAL INTERVAL (INCHES) I~ jiNCHES) (INCHES)
PC4 42,0 1:00 15 13.5 19.0 5.5 3
1:15 15 19.0 22.0 3.0 5
1:30 15 22.0 24.75 2.75 6
\,
1:45 15 11.25 16.0 4.75 3
2:00 15 16.0 21.75 5.75 3
2:15 15 21.75 24.25 2.5 6
2:30 15 24.25 27.0 2.75 6
2:45 15 21.25 24.25 3.0 5
3:00 15 24.25 25.5 1.25 12
3:15 15 25.5 28.0 2.5 6
3:30 15 28.0 30.5 2.5 6
3:45 15 19.75 22.25 2.5 6
4:00 15 22.25 24.25 2.0 8
4:15 15 24.25 26.75 2.5 6
4:30 15 26.75 29.25 2.5 6
Job No. GS-3897 Fig. 9
SATURATION AND PREPARATION PERCOLATION TEST
DATE: 04/30/03 DATE: 05/01/03
TIME AT START OF SATURATION: 12:00 pm WATER IN BORING AFTER 24 HOURS
X YES NO
PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS
East Site (Site #2)
r DEPTH TO WATER
HOLE DEPTH TIME AT TIME CHANGE PERGOLA-
NUMBER (INCHES) START OF INTERVAL IN WATER TION RATE
INTERVAL (MINUTES) START OF END OF DEPTH (MIN/INCH)
INTERVAL INTERVAL (INCHES)
(INCHES) (INCHES)
P-5 44.0 1:00 15 17.25 24.5 7.25 2
1:15 15 24.5 27.75 3.25 5
1:30 15 7.25 18.25 11.0 1
1:45 15 18.25 23.75 5 .. 5 3
2:00 15 23.75 28.25 4.5 3
2:15 15 25.0 27.75 2.75 6
2:30 15 27.75 31.75 4.0 4
2:45 15 14.25 22.0 7.75 2
3:00 15 22.0 24.25 2.25 7
3:15 15 24.25 27.75 3.5 4
3:30 15 27.75 31.5 3.75 4
3:45 15 20.0 23.0 3.0 5
-----···-~---"''
4:00 15 23.0 25.25 2.25 7
•·-··-oo• -• ··-4·'--·--"'--·-.... ... ,. .•
4:15 15 25.25 28.5 3.25 5 __________ ,_ ,., __________ _..,, ......... ~.
4:30 15 28.5 31.5 30 ~ l ... -.-~--~--·····~ ......
-··· '. . -·-····· . . I
' ____ .. . . i
~
..•... .. ' I -----· ..... I r
-· .... ···-·. i
' 1 ---. -------...•. I
.J • ·---·· -----··-··--.... 1 t
I ' ---------.. t· .. . ·--I· . ·-t .... ' ' ' ! ! ;
...... . ---·---. --'------··-----·-··-· ...
Job No. GS-3897 Fi<J. 10
t
' !
' f
!
I
.,\ rURATION AND PREPARATION
. >I\ TE: 04130/03
i IME AT START OF SATURATION: 12:00 pm
PERCOLATION TEST
DATE: 05/01103
WATER IN BORING AFTER24 HOURS
YES X NO
PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS
1 ,•;t Site (Site #2)
DEPTH TO WATER
HOLE DEPTH TIME AT TIME CHANGE
:WMBER (INCHES) START OF INTERVAL IN WATER
INTERVAL (MINUTES) START OF END OF DEPTH
INTERVAL INTERVAL (INCHES)
(INCHES) (INCHES)
P-6 42.0 1:00 15 12.5 18.0 5.5
1:15 15 18.0 20.5 2.5
1:30 15 20.5 23.75 3.25
1:45 15 11.25 14.25 3.0
2:00 15 14.25 18.0 3.75
2:15 15 18.0 20.25 . 2.25
2:30 15 20.25 23.0 2.75
2:45. 15 23.0 24.5 1.5
3:00 15 24.5 25.5 1.0
3:15 15 25.5 26.75 1.25
3:30 15 26,75 28.0 1.25
3:45 15 28.0 29,25 1.25
4:00 15 29.25 30.25 1.0
4:15 15 21.75 23.75 2.0
4:30 15 23.75 24.75 1.0
i !
I
i I I i I I
;ob No. GS-3897
PERGOLA-
TION RATE
(MIN/INCH)
3
6
5
5
4
7
6
10
15
12
12
12
15
8
15
'
l l
Fig. 11
swBJEcT F,'/1 p .. j C<'~>ss Sed,-. ...
-u ,
~\) '1. ~ ' .., 4:\1\
--.ll
~
~
\II
\
" o· ..
\:t
l
I
i ~ i -F ,, J r ..,_
I .1=1{
R \(l
' '
h ' -~ ~ ' R
1 4;, < ~
·-$ c.r
' X o "
t \u~0
1<.'
' ~ E
I
I
L
I
I
[
~
0 .
-{:.
" ""\) • ~ ·o h ""
0 'I) -.....
I
___.,
1.::
I I.
-?
i
~
~
\.
'l)
CTL/THOMPSON, INC. ~
CONSULTING GEOTECHNICAL -...
AND MATERIALS ENGINEERS •
JOBNOc;::.~-sfltff DATE 5-Zt-o-;J ~
BY: ____2 PAGE_/_ OF I
·~ ...
\) ,_
+ 0
tU
I.
V) .,.
·f-. II)
V)
cd_y_
•. ~ .v 2 ::f_C \J _s--v
\) \) ~--!
·-,j \J
\n j ·~
-e. C(_
~ --II l'\-. :::: ---....... ---....... '3--
\ '-._
Co .. M
'lJ ~ 1$ '-1
\X \6·
~
~~ ..._Q
I"' I()
1\
I
I
JOB NO. GS-3897
TABLE I
SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
NATURAL A TTERBERG LIMITS UNCONFINED SOLUBLE PASSING
BORING DEPTH NATURAL DRY SWELL' LIQUID PLASTICITY COMPRESSIVE SULFATES NO. 200 SOIL CLASSIFICATION
MOISTURE DENSITY LIMIT INDEX STRENGTH SIEVE
(FEET) (%) (PCF) (%) (%) (%) (PSF) (%) (%)
TH-2 3 24.6 102 0.0 33 SAND, CLAYEY (SC)
TH-3 4 26.3 99 25 12 70 CLAY, SANDY (Cl)
TH-3 9 22.8 109 19 6 37 SAND, CLAYEY (SC)
TH-4 3 30.3 96 -0.1 70 CLAY, SANDY (CL)
1-'
f-
.
-·
---
"'Note: Swell due to wetting at an applied load of 1 ,000 psf. Page 1 of 1
CTLfThompson, Inc.
1971 West 12th Avenue
Denver, Colorado 80204
(303) 825-0777
Commercial Testing Laboratories, Inc.
22 Lipan Street
Denver, Colorado 80223
(303) 825-0777
CTLfThompson, Inc.
5240 Mark Dabling Blvd.
Colorado Springs, Colorado 80918
(71 9) 528-8300
CTLfThompson, Inc.
234 Center Dr.
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601
(970) 945-2809
CTLfThompson, Inc.
375 E. Horsetooth Rd.
The Shores Office Park
Building 3, Suite 100
Ft. Collins, Colorado 80525
(970) 206-9455
CTLfThompson, Inc.
4718N. Elizabeth Street, Suite C-2
Pueblo, Colorado 81 008
(719) 595-1287
Parcel Detail Page 1 of 4
Garfield County Assessor/Treasurer
Parcel Detail Information
A~,~eSSQI/J):eASJJreiPmpertySei\I<::h I As$essor Subset Qu~nr I Assessor Sales_Search
C:!erk&R~<::2rdeLR\':<::eptio!LSeArch
Parcel Detail I Value Detail Sales Detail I ResidentiAl/Commercial Improvement Detail
Land Detail I Photographs
I TaxArea II Account Number II Parcel Number II Mill Levy I
I 021 II R211004 II 212734300272 II 45.694 I
Owner Name and Mailing Address
IGILSTRAP PROPERTIES LLLP I
123899 HIGHWAY 6 I
IRIFLE, CO 81650 I
Legal Description
JSECT,TWN,RNG:34-5-92 DESC: A TR IN I
ITHE NWSW AKA LOT 1 HUNT EXEMPTION. I
JBK: 1024 PG:0160 BK:0768 PG:0876 I
IBK:0768 PG:0770 BK: 1810 PG:963 I
IRECPT:700135 BK:1642 PG:600 I
IRECPT:664029 BK:1593 PG:467 I
IRECPT:653396 BK:1593 PG:465 I
IRECPT:653395 BK:l593 PG:464 I
jRECPT:653394 BK:1555 PG:122 I
IRECPT:644742 BK:1024 PG:0157 I
JBK:0768 PG:0626 PRE:R210792 SPEC I
JASMT: SILT WATER PROJECT I
Location
J:=l =====Pb=y=si=ca=I=A=d=dr=e==ss=: 1, ... /N_O;.....R_THW __ E_S_T_O_F_S __ IL_T __ ___.IJ
http://www. garcoact.comlassessor/Parcel.asp? AccountNumber=R211 004 9/21/2007
Parcel Detail Page 2of4
I Subdivision: I
I Land Acres: 1114.43 I
I Land Sq Ft: 110
I Section II Township II Range I
I 34 II 5 II 92 I
Property Tax Valuation Information
II Actual Value II Assessed Value I
I Land: II 14,02011 4,0701
I Improvements: II oil ol
I Total: II 14,02011 4,07ol
Sale Date: 116/2/2004
Sale Price: !1139 ,000
Basic Building Characteristics
Number of Residential
!o I Buildings:
Number of Commllnd
jo I Buildings:
No Building Records Found
Tax Information
I Tax Year II Transaction Type II Amount I
I 2006 II Tax Payment: Whole II ($197.40)1
I 2006 II Tax Payment: Whole II ($339.00)1
2006 II Tax Amount II $339.001
2006 II Tax Amount II $197.401
2005 II Tax Payment: Whole II ($339.00)1
2005 II Tax Payment: Whole II ($198.16)1
I 2005 II Tax Amount II $339.ool
I 2005 II Tax Amount II $198.161
I 2004 II Tax Payment: Whole II ($216.78)1
I 2004 II Tax Payment: Whole II ($339.00)1
I 2004 II Tax Amount II $339.001
I 2004 II Tax Amount II $216.78)
http: I lwww. garcoact.com/ assessor/Parcel.asp? AccountN umber=R211 004 9/21/2007
Parcel Detail
I 2003 II Interest Payment II ($6.78)1
I 2003 II Interest Charge II $6.781
I 2003 II Tax Payment: Whole II ($339.00)1
I 2003 II Interest Payment II ($4.81)1
I 2003 II Interest Charge II $4.811
I 2003 II Tax Payment: Whole II ($240.44)1
I 2003 II Tax Amount II $339.ool
I 2003 II Tax Amount II $240.441
I 2002 II Tax Payment: Whole II ($339.00)1
2002 II Tax Payment: Whole II ($228.60)1
2002 II Tax Amount II $339.ool
2002 II Tax Amount II $228.601
2001 II Tax Payment: Whole II ($243.00)1
2001 II Tax Payment: Whole II ($233.50)1
2001 II Tax Amount II $243.ool
2001 II Tax Amount II $233.501
2000 II Tax Payment: Whole II ($243.00)1
2000 II Tax Payment: Whole II ($241.12)1
2000 II Interest Payment II ($7.23)1
I 2000 II Interest Charge II $7.291
I 2000 II Interest Payment II ($7.29)1
I 2000 II Interest Charge II $7.231
I 2000 II Tax Amount II $243.ool
I 2000 II Tax Amount II $241.121
I 1999 II Tax Payment: Second Half II ($99.00)1
I 1999 II Tax Payment: Second Half II ($120.88)1
I 1999 II Tax Payment: First Half II ($99.00)1
I 1999 II Tax Payment: First Half II ($120.88)1
I 1999 II Tax Amount II $241.761
I 1999 II Tax Amount II $198.ooJ
Top of Page
Assessor D11tabase .Search Options \ Treasurer Database Search Qptions
Clerk&-Recorder Diltilh?se Se<m;;h Qptions
Garfield Gmmty Home Page
http://www .garcoact.com/assessor/Parcel.asp? AccountNumber=R211 004
Page 3 of4
9/2112007