The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutApplicationGcx -�`zt Zd c c un 108 Sri' Street, Suite 401, Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Ph:970-945-8212 Fx:970-384-3440 Inspection Line:888-868-5306 www.garfield-county.com BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION CV, 1'41) SEP i 2 201i (3Ak ,LL L) COI1N1 Y 1 Parcel No: (this informaimin informationis available at the assessors office 97(1-945-9134) 2391 q 0.57 13 i — Lot No: Block No: Subd J Exemption: 13 &x'1121.let C7 gk11c14 2 1Address:A(ifan address has not been assigned o41 if C, & I-60 4 eft -LA, please provide CR. HWY or Street Name & City) or and legal description CAr a cs-h oAi.1 co 3 Owner: (property owner) C. -ng • ' CVh+?11►A YVlC-51+12.iE Mailing Address: TSC) 660 -f -l -i :CaEtfl / a1 DSAve2, co Ph: 303 7S7 -6t/C Alt Ph: 4 �Contractor: is.., ! 13Alc5 Mailing A dress: f oo2 (3&hkkE I�ItFG C..ienwohra 55s�, (.0 s-Ico( Ph: 7.749 - cdS--G9 ' - Alt Ph:l f7o- 1.4s- 2L3-7 5 Manufactured home installer: Mailing Address: Ph: Lic #: 6 Architect: DICK 4,6,..n.91.6 tin,* ,—% Mailing Address: et 700,57-0114 +4%. T at. L3PraA4T1 Co ;lilt Ph: 3o3- »5-40- Iro5Z, — Alt Ph: 7 8 Engineer: (lf& .J60A CI v /L. • . yr av cruv ,J1L Mailing Address: Cpft;h t•..1013! ..,p ? j 5.a Pal-%11.1")/6c.f.i.,'vo Ph: - 52.s- - 0 lac Height: 31 Alt Ph: No. of Floors: 3 Sq. ht. of Building: 4-1 toGt) Sq. Ft. or Acres of Lot: 6—.1 9 Use of Building: L41Kcsidendal ❑Commercial DOther Class of Work: ,� 1 w ❑Alteration DAddition DRepair ❑Demo DMove 10 Describe Work: , VW, (,�, Sin ebTriPet_ 14 E in • T'. 5031). v, 5r + 11 Garage:. 67rkt( i ed ❑Detached Septic: EKSIT S ❑Community Type of Heat: �f aC7iV 1. Gas ❑Propane ❑Electric ❑Other 12 Driveway Permit: 0 AC 6Eg- Exe tv--. Owners valuation of Work: 0 7S73. dv0 NOTICE Authority. Ibis application for a Building Permit must be signed by the Owner of the property, described above, or an authorized agent. lithe signature below is not that of the Owner, a separate letter of authority, signed by the Owner, must be provided with this Application. Lees] Access, A Building Permit cannot be issued without proof of legal and adequate access to the property for purposes of inspections by the Building Department. Other Permits. Multiple separate permits may be required: (I) State Electrical Permit, (2) County ISDS Permit, (3) another permit required for use on the property identified above, e.g. Stale or County Highway/ Road Access or a State Wastewater Discharge Permit. Void Permit. A Building Permit becomes null and void if the work authorized is not commenced within 180 days of the date of issuance and if work is suspended or abandoned For a period of 180 days after commencement. CER'T'IFICATION 1 hereby certify that 1 have read this Application and that the information contained above is tate and correct. 1 understand that the Building Department accepts the Application, along with the plans and specifications and other data submitted by inc or on my behalf (submittals), based upon my certification as 10 accuracy. Assuming completeness Mille submittals and approval of this Application, a Building Permit will be issued granting permission to tae, as Owner, to construct the stmcture{s) axed facilities detailed on the submittals reviewed by the Building Department. In consideration of the issuance ofthe Building Permit, 1 agree that 1 and my agents will comply with provisions of any federal, state or Iota[ law regulating the work and the Garfield County Building Code, ISDS regulations and applicable land use regulations (County Regulation(s)). I acknowledge that the Building Permit may be suspended or revoked, upon notice from the County, if the location, construction or use ante structure(s) and facility(ies), described above, are not in compliance with County Regulation(s) or any other applicable law. 1 hereby grant permission to the Building Department to enter the property, described above, to inspect the work. 1 further acknowledge that Ilhe issumicc of the Badding Permit does not prevent the Building Official from: (I) requiring the correction of errors in the submittals, if any, discovered after issuance; or (2) stopping construction or else of the structure(s) or facilily(ies) if such is in violation of County Regulation(s) or any other applicable law. Review of this Application, including submittals, and inspections of the work by the Building Department do not constitute an acceptmxc of responsibility or liability by the County of errors, omissions or discrepancies.. As the Owner, I acknowledge that responsibility for compliance with federal, state and local laws and County Regulations rest with me and my authorized agents, including without limitation my architect designer, engineer and/ or builder. 1 HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE NOTiCE & CERTIFICATION ABOVE: DATE 1 i:.#... r S SIGNATURE Plan r ul •. t Jr, [3N Q- (1►11 cf.10�,- it. 401.04 M5Q-2103.41 STAFF USE ONLY Special Conditions: Adjusted Valuation: 30 / i33-_ 0.--`13 Plan Check Fee; 8/. z z Permit Fee: ► g. y. 9rs Manu home Fee: — Mise Fees: - Total Fees: 3SO 6.17 Fees Paid: 1403-04 Balance Due: 2, 1 05 . 11 BP No & Issue Date: ISDS No & Issued Date: BM -610g aP)--Alg9 Setbacks: f- t-'rz,�, } 5-16, OCC Group. g C Cons( Type: Zoning: f Z sib ..- , /6) syr /`�/j%"/% APPROVAL DATE APPROVAL. DATE Building Plan Review Description of Work: Single family dwelling on unfinished basement and crawl space, cova Bin #: Location Address: 486 SCHOONER LN CARBONDALE, CO General Information rCase Manager: David Bartholomew Plan Case Number: BLDG -9-11-6994 Parcel: 239129405013 Application Date; 09/12/2011 Contacts Owner: Mac & Cynthia McShane Applicant: Mac & Cynthia McShane Applicant Phone: 303-757-5446 Email: Building Planning/Zoning / Engineered Foundation r Property Line Setbacks ____Z___/ Driveway Permit 30ft Stream Setbacks Surveyed Site Pian / Flood Plain / Septic Permit and Setbacks / Building height Grade/Topography 30% f Zoning Sign -off Attach Residential Plan Review List /OpRoad Impact Fees Minimum Application Questionnare HOAIDRC Approval 7 /� Subdivision Plat Notes / Grade/Topography 40% jzii Fire Department Review / Planning Issues f f Valuation Determination/Fees Subdivision Plat l Red Line Plans/Stamps/Sticker Attach Conditions Application Signed Pian Reviewer To Sign Application f ParcellSchedule No. /JP/ 40# Snowload Letter - Manu. Homes Soils Report General Comments: ttr Wednesday, October 5, 2011 Applicant Address Date VALUATION FEE DETERMINATION Mac & Cynthia McShane 486 Schooner Lane, Carbondale 10/5/2011 Subdivision Lot/Block Contractor Finished (Livable Area): Main 2308 sq.ft Upper 876 sq.ft Lower sq.ft Other sq.ft X $74,68 Total Square Feet 3184 sq.ft Total Valuation Basement: Unfinished Conversion of Unfinished to Finished Other Total Valuation Garage/Storage (wood framed) Conversion of garage to finished living Carport Other Total Valuation Crawl Space Total Valuation Decks/ Patios/Porches Covered Open Other Total Valuation Type of Construction: Occupancy: Total Valuation Total Valuation 750 672 sq.ft X $41.00 sq,ft X $33.68 sq.ft X sq.ftX $18.00 sq.ft X $56.68 sq.ftX $12.00 sq.ft X 1498 sq.ft X $9.00 297 49 sq.ft X $24.00 sq.ft X $12.00 sq.ft X Commercial sf X sf X sf X sf X sf X sf X Stirling Ranch Lot # 13 Doug Hayes 237,781.12 30,750.00 12,096.00 13,482.00 7,716.00 0.00 301,825.12 E. Mac McShane, Psy.D. Licensed Clinical Psychologist 950 South Cherry Street m.. Suite 421 Denver, Colorado 80246 Telephone (303) 757-5446 Facsimile (303) 757-6519 August 21, 2011 Garfield County Building and Planning Dept 108 8t'' Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 RE: Permit for Single family Residence McShane and Calvin Owners 486 Schooner Lane, Carbondale To whom it may concern: 1 am writing to give our builder/contractor, Doug Hayes, permission to act as our authorized agent for us in signing for the permit on our behalf and for any other matters involving the Garfield County Building Department. My wife, Cynthia Calvin, and I are planning to build a single family residence at 486 Schooner Lane, Carbondale which is located in the Stirling Ranch Development in Missouri Heights. We will be building on Lot 13 Stirling Ranch PU.D. which we own. The parcel number is 239129405013 Section: 20 Townshp: 7 Range: 87 Subdivision: STIRLING RANCH PIED Lot 13. I can be reached at 303-915-5894 or a .... c E. Mac McShane if you have any questions, Garfield County To whom it may concern The Address of: Lot 13 Sterling Ranch Subdivision Carbondale, Colorado 81623 Road & Bridge This address is exempt from getting a driveway permit from Garfield County Road & Bridge. The said address is in an existing subdivision and will not be accessing a county road directly. Any Questions please call me. Mike Prehm Garfield County Road & Bridge Foreman / District 1 (970) 956-1223 Office (970) 618-7109 Cell (970) 945-1318 NOTE: If any required information is missing, delays in issuing the permit are to be expected. If determined by the Building Official that additional information is necessary to review the application and/or plans for compliance, the application may be placed on hold until the required information is provided. Work may not proceed without the issuance of a permit. The building department will collect a Plan Review fee at time of application submittal. The permit fee, as well as any Septic or Road Impact fees will be collected when the permit is issued. The permit application must be signed by the owner or by person having written authority from the owner to act as their representative. Building cannot be occupied until a Certificate of Occupancy (CO) is issued. Using the building without a CO will be considered an illegal occupancy and may be grounds for vacating the premises. (Final/CO inspection requirements will be attached to your approved field set of plans.) I hereby acknowledge I have read, understand, and will abide by the requirements of this checklist. ure of •wner Date Garfield County Building & Planning 108 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: 970-945-8212 Fax: 970-384-3470 www.garfield-county.com SC- ® 1 5' q8) ani U '7 S4 a7A (i) 3,4A-Levoie 5 Qt,iva?pr147-4-r fivoe �;.9 ►, 9' 3 4"6 CONDITIONS OF PERMIT BLRE-9-11-2198 MacShane Residence 486 Schooner Lane Carbondale, Colorado 1) PRIOR TO CO/FINAL INSPECTION, A SEALED SURVEY IS REQUIRED TO VERIFY BUILDING HEIGHT DOES NOT EXCEED 1000 FT ELEVATION, MEASURED AT THE MIDPOINT OF MAIN ROOF AS REFERENCED ON PLAN PAGE A-3. PLEASE REFERENCE THE ATTACHED EXISTING GRADE SURVEY, SEALED, SIGNED AND DATED FEBRUARY 6, 2012. MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT SHALL NOT EXCEED TWENTY FIVE (25) FEET AS DEFINED IN THE GARFIELD COUNTY UNIFIED LAND USE RESOLUTION OF 2008. c//e_ GARP I' t..D COUN1Y BUILDING DEPARTM 108 8TH STREET, alit F1.1 E .= 1. AS 1t. •_�4:. YV:10 is 1-)( 1,..;= _ f�r PERflfr3 i'4!0,``: SCCJ e- lei+,Ic _. '.Ir{ �i r'i41i b inr 4fiiS pori: n 4:4 Cii; (:II CO, ktr Mac & Cynthia McShane 486 Schooner Lane Stirling Ranch in Missouri Heights Carbondale, CO BLRE-9-11-2198 Plan review/activity for BLRE-9-11-2198 9/12/11 Application received for a single family dwelling on unfinished basement and crawl space, covered and uncovered patios, and attached garage. Permit BLRE-9-11-2198. 9/26/11 Review plans, called contractor Doug Hayes, informed him each set of architectural plans differ and structural plans do not reference architectural plans. Request revised plans. 10/5/11 Received/reviewed revised plans, forwarded to front counter for permit issuance. 1/27/12 A stop work order was issued by the building inspector. Need to verify setbacks and building height due to relocation of structure. 2/8/12 Meeting with architect Dick Hampleton to discuss submittal requirements/documentation to satisfy the height limitations. 2/10/12 A partial stop work order was lifted for areas not affecting the height restriction. 6/11/12 Received revisions designed by architect David Panico. zfreti 6--.01k- 6/14/12 Reviewed revised plans, alterations to lower roof height over master J edroom. Called / contractor Doug Hayes and requested 2 copies of stamped surveyed site plans to verify elevations. 6/21/12 Received/reviewed surveyed site plan, inserted into revised plans, forwarded to front counter for issuance. "Conditions of Permit" were attached. 10/8/12 Received revisions to roof design over master bedroom. �� ZZ 6 1 10/10/12 Reviewed/approve revised plans, forward to front counter for issuance. NOTE: Contactor notified, plans were never picked up. (Discarded when 12/3/12 submittal received) tv 12/3/12 Received revisions to include a pod addition for an office and guest bedrodfri iocattetl off the main entry. Included revised roof design over master bedroom is unchanged as submitted on 10/8/12. 12/5/12 Reviewed/approve revised plans, forward to front counter for issuance. Amended "Conditions of Permit" were attached. Additional plans have not been submitted for review as of 4/15/13. HEPWORTH- PAWLAK GEOTECHNFCAL October 29, 2011 Mac McShave & Cynthia Calvin 747 Newport Street Denver, Colorado 80220 .l `lim,_ .:'i„i !A• Job No. 110 171A Subject: Observation of Excavation, Proposed Residence, Lot 13, Stirling Ranch, 0486 Schooner Lane, Garfield County, Colorado Dear Mr. McShave & Ms. Calvin: As requested by Doug Hayes, a representative of Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. observed the excavation at the subject site on October 13, 2011 to evaluate the soils exposed for foundation support. The findings of our observations and recommendations for the foundation design are presented in this report. We previously conducted a subsoil study for design of foundations at the site and presented our find ngs in a report dated July 26, 2010, Job No. 110 171A. The services were performed as additional services in accordance with our proposal for professional engineering services to you, dated May 20, 2010. At the time of our visit to the site, the foundation excavation had been cut in multiple levels from 2 to 6 feet below the adjacent ground surface. The soils exposed in the bottom of the excavation consisted of basalt gravel, cobbles and boulders in a calcareous sandy clay matrix. Results of swell -consolidation testing performed on a sample of the matrix soils taken from the site, shown on Figure 1, indicate the matrix soils have low to moderate compressibility under conditions of loading and wetting with a minor collapse potential (settlement under constant Ioad) when wetted under a light load. No free water was encountered in the excavation and the soils were slightly moist. The soil conditions exposed in the excavation are consistent with those previously encountered on the site and suitable for support of spread footings designed for the recommended allowable bearing pressure of 2,000 psf. Loose and disturbed soils should be moistened and compacted or removed in the footing areas to expose the undisturbed natural soils. Other recommendations presented in our previous report which are applicable should also be observed. The recommendations submitted in this letter are based on our observation of the soils exposed within the foundation excavation and the previous limited subsurface exploration at the site. Variations in the subsurface conditions below the excavation could increase h�lf��.�'1 �l ��•��i �i! ., 1,TA.1., iint:` )1-5561 • Mac McShave & Cynthia Calvin October 29, 2011 Page 2 the risk of foundation movement. We should be advised of any variations encountered in the excavation conditions for possible changes to recommendations contained in this letter. Our services do not include determining the presence, prevention or possibility of mold or other biological contaminants (MOBC) developing in the future. If the client is concerned about MOBC, then a professional in this special field of practice should be consulted. If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call our office. Sincerely, HEPWORTH — PAWLINICAL, INC. F14 .0° 2. - Daniel E. Hardin, P. % Rev. by: SLP DEH/ksw attachment Figure 1 -- Swell -Consolidation Test Results cc: Glenwood Structural — Attn: Dolf Gora (gsc@sopris.net) Hayes Construction— Attn: Doug Hayes (doug(ahavesaspen.com) Dick Hampleman, Architect — (harpleman(&,,conmcast.net) Job No. 110171A Gtech Compression % 0 1 2 3 4 5 Moisture Content = 11.4 percent Dry Density = 74 pcf Sample of: Sandy Silty Clay Matrix From; Footing Grade at South -Central Building Area Compression upon wetting 0.1 1.0 APPLIED PRESSURE - ksf 10 100 110 171A I-1 Hepworth—Pawlak Geotechnical SWELL -CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Figure 1