Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication-PermitGarfield County Building & Sanitation Department 108 8th Street, Suite #401 Glenwood Springs, Co. 81601 Office 945-8212 Inspection Line 384-5003 a,t<-f Job Address: TBD .beitl eagle way, Carbondale Locality: Aspen Glen Clublodge, Lot 1/2393-191-73-001 Use of Building: residence duplex \)'ft\:\:--¥\ Owner: PCA LLC Contractor: brikor associates Amount of Permit: $6,182.14 1 2 3 4 GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION 108 8th Street, Suite 401, Glenwood Springs, Co 81601 Phone: 970-945-8212/ Fax: 970-384-3470 I Inspection Line: 970-384-5003 ww.w.gartielQ~cotmt:v.com ' Parcel No: rhY1.r \C\\-+"3-eD \ Job Address: ~C)\c\ "Ffl ~ wrtu -rJdu~E-6:> r?lb.J;s Lot No: \ (, U )(.1/_~c o: ro:: • AL~~~~/'Y_l) '1'1/ Owner:fc,4 U..6 A#J'&x 1~1 ~dil ~lt../1 Ph: <flt>-"lt~-~()~~ WkPh; 5 cog~/I<Drt. ~ctr;;bll ~~~~ MPW60 Ph· AltPh: /)lt!.~6. !ll'-11 ''tf1" 1(~'5 -~~~ 6 A;;~c~[ ~~~ ~ ~~J~ess ~·z:ru 7.1'h: ":J-o..(,({; .u .. AltPh: ~eRSi!K~~ I (I 7 Sq. Ft. of Building:"'! f,'?'2, Sq. Ft. ofLot: 141505 ~ f He~ '!..to'' ~~~og'~W'r 8 Use ofBui1ding: ~ 'OfE.I\) 1 u-\4.1~)<. 9 Describe Work:~ l?lJ~ U'6t r::ttiJ.l a 10 Class of Work: ~ew o Alteration o Addition 11 Garage: Septic: ~ttached 0 Detached o ISDS a Community 12 Driveway Permit: :;~u~l\?i:'S!~"'?r· 1=':l<fYttl!fi\-::c~· · ~Owners valuatiOn of Work: $ &:...ZI. 4®~, 1'2. . .. . ~ N?TICE If the signature bcl:W is not that of the Owner, a separate Authority. This application fora Building Pennit must be signed by the Owner of the property, described above, or an authorized agent. letter of authority, signed by the Owner, must be provided with this Application. Legal Access. A Building Pennit cannot be issued without proof of legal and adequate access to the property for purposes of inspections by the Building Department. Other Permits. Multiple separate permits may be required: (1) State Electrical Permit, (2) County ISDS Permit, (3) another permit required for use on the property identified above, e.g. State or County Highway/ Road Access or a State Wastewater Discharge Permit. Void Permit. A Building Permit becomes nul! and void if the work authorized is not commenced within 180 days of the date of issuance and if work is suspended or abandoned for a period of180 days after commencement. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that I have read this Application and that the information contained above is tnte and correct. I understand that the Bullding Department accepts the Application, along with the plans and specifications and other data submitted by me or on my behalf (submittatsr,based upon my cc1 tlfil::atiorr~--' - Assuming completeness of the submittals and approval of this Application, a Building Permit will be issued granting permission to me, as Owner, to construct the structure(s) and facilities detailed on the submittals reviewed by the Building Department. In consideration of the issuance of the Building Permit, I agree that l and my agents will comply with provisions of any fcderil!, state or local law regulating the work and the Garfield County Building Code, ISDS regulations and applicable land use regulations (County Regulation(s)). I acknowledge that the Building Permit may be suspended or revoked, upon notice from the County, if the location, construction or use of the strucnrre(s) and faci\ity(les), described above, arc not in compliance with County Rcgulation(s) or any other applicable law. I hereby grant permission to the Building Department to enter the property, described above, to inspect the work. I further acknowledge that the issuance oftllc Building Permit does not prevent the Building Official from: (1) requiring the correction of errors in the submittals, if any, discovered after issuance; or (2) stopping construction or use of the structure(s) or facility(ics) if such is in violation ·--···1)::""~~ R"iow ofthi' Appl:~ dudh~ ttal,, ood · 'pcotiom oftho wotk by tho Buildiog Doportmoot do not oon,.ituto'" ""P~""' of "'pon,ibility Ot liobility by tho County of orro~, omi>Sion' or discrepancies. As th ~ I ackn edge that esponsibility for compliance with federal, state and local laws and County Regulations rest with me and my authorized agents, including without limitation my Otohitoo iJ"i '!ft gi (;ond/ Ot i!dcr. • 16 !HEREBYAC fl TO• AV ADANDUNDERSTANDTHENOTICE&CERTIFIC7~~l:~• 6 '1 OWNERS I IGNATYJRI; ./ DATE /Y%171 I ' I I I STAFF USE ONLY Special Conditions: Adjusted Valuation: \Z. Plan Check Fee: ~ 1 Permit Fee: .., S' Manu home Fee: Mise Fees: l-, () '\ L\ \'\ ;;L~3') '3-Jl--1 Ia If q ISDS Fee: ' Total Fees: I '1 FcesPaid: \\·~~ Balance Due: \a~~~;e: ISDS No & Issued Date: <:f b\8'2 j$ ~i-ft·?>. 61 3703 5':3 Setbacks: OCC Group: ConstType: Zoning: p \.l '() :re.c.. BLDG DEPT: PLNGDEPT: n 4 \7.~ \-o--1 ~~\ \}1 \c-: \-01 AP DATE APP DATE v The following items are required by Garfield County for a final Inspection: 1) A fmal Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector. 2) Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department and posted at the structure and where readily visible from access road. 3) A fmished roof; a lockable building; completed exterior siding; exterior doors and windows installed; a complete kitchen with cabinets, sink with hot & cold running water, non-absorbent kitchen floor covering, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove and refrigerator; all necessary plumbing. 4) All bathrooms must be complete, with washbowl, tub or shower, toilet, hot and cold running water, non-absorbent floors, walls finished, and privacy door. 5) Steps over three (3) risers, outside or inside must be must have handrails. Balconies and decks over 30" high must be constructed to all IBC and IRC requirements including guardrails. 6) Outside grading completed so that water slopes away from the building; 7) Exceptions to the outside steps, decks, grading may be made upon the demonstration of extenuating circumstances., i.e. weather. Under such circumstances A Certificate of Occupancy may be issued conditionally. 8) A final inspection sign off by the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department for driveway installation, where applicable; as well as any final sign off by the Fire District, and/or State Agencies where applicable. A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (C.O.) WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. A C.O. MAY TAKE UP TO 5 BUSINESS DAYS TO BE PROCESSED AND ISSUED. OWNER CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A C.O. IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATING PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET. I understand and agree to abide by the above conditions for occupancy, use and the issuance of a C.O. for the building identified in the Buil · g Permit. OWNERSSIG A Bapplicationseptember2007 VALUATION FEE DETERMINATION Applicant Address Date . .:,P.::;C:;-A;.;L;::L:::.C~;;-;----------Snbdivision .:B:,:a:;;ld':E=?ag':'le':-'-W:..:a:<.y _________ Lot/Block ..:1_,01.:2:::.31.:2:::0.::.07;__ __________ Contractor Finished (Livable Area): Main Upper Lower Other Total Basement: Unfinished Square Feet Valuation Conversion of Unfinished to Finished Total Garage: ValuatiOn Crawl Space Valuation Decks/ Patios Valuation 3098 sf 1538 sf 3098 sf .....--sf X $74.68 ~734 sf sf X $41.00 sf X $33.68 1074 sf X $18.00 sf X $9.00 L ~club lodge Bnkor assoc 577,575.12 0.00 19,332.00 0.00 Covered Open 144 sf X 588 sf X $24.00"' :;;<;:;!:,, $12.00 = -7ot;;r.,~ Valuation Type of Construction: Occupancy: Valuation Total Valuation Commercial sf X sf X sf X sf X sf X sf X ./10,512.00 0.00 607,419.12 GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING 970-945-8212 MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS For SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING CONSTRUCTION Including NEW CONSTRUCTION ADDITIONS ALTERATIONS And MOVED BUILDINGS In order to understand the scope of the work intended under a pennit application and expedite the issuance of a permit it is· important that complete information be provided. When reviewing a plan and it's discovered that required information has not been provided by the applicant, this will result in the delay of the pennit issuance and in proceeding with building construction. The owner or contractor shall be required to provide this information before the plan review can proceed. Other plans that are in line for review may be given attention before the new infonnation may be reviewed after it has been provided to the Building Department. Please review this document to determine if you have enough information to design your project and provide adequate information to facilitate a plan review. Also, please consider using a design professional for assistance in your design and a construction professional for construction of your project. Any project with more than ten (10) occupants requires the plans to be sealed by a Colorado Registered Design ProfessionaL To provide for a more understandable plan in order to determine compliance with the building, plumbing and mechanical codes, applicants are requested to review the following checklist prior to and during design. Applicants are required to indicate appropriately and to submit the completed checklist at time of application for a permit. Plans to be included for a Building Permit, must be on drafting paper at least 18"x24" and drawn to scale. Plans must include a floor plan, a concrete footing and fouodation plan, elevations all sides with 1 decks, balcony, steps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the finish grade line and original grade. A section showing in detail, from the bottom of the footing to the top of the roof, including re-bar, anchor bolts, pressure treated plates, floor joists, wall studs and spacing, insulation, sheeting, house-rap, (which is required), siding or any approved building material. Engineered foundations may be required. A window schedule. A door schedule. A floor framing plan, a roof framing plan, roof must be designed to withstand a 40 pound per square foot up to 7,000 feet in elevation, a 90 M.P.H. wind speed, wind exposure B or C, and a 36 inch frost depth. All sheets to be identified by number and indexed. All of the above requirements must be met or your plans will be returned. All plans submitted must be incompliance with the 2003 IRC. I. Is a site plan included that identifies the location of the proposed structure or addition and distances to the property lines from each corner of the proposed structure(s) prepared by a licensed surveyor and has the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing? Properties with slopes of30% or greater must be shown on the site plan. (NOTE Section: 106.2) Any site plan for the placement of any portion of a structure within 50 ft. of a property line and not within a previously surveyed building envelope on a subdivision final plat shall be prepared by a licensed surveyor and have the surveyor's signature and professional stamp on the drawing. Any structure to be built within a building envelope of a lot shown on a recorded subdivision plat shall include a copy of the building envelope as it is shown on the final plat with the proposed structure located within the e;rvelope. Yes_--'\/~_ 2. Does the site plan also include any other buildings on the property, setback easements and utility easements? Please refer to Section 5.05.03 in the Garfield County Zoning Resolution if the property you are applying for a building permit on is located on a corner lot. Special setbacks do :;pply. Yes. __ ...Jt/L-_ 3. Does the site plan include when applicable the location of the I.S.D.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System) and the distances to the property lines, wells (on subject property and ~d~:cenwerties), streams or water courses? 4. Does the site plan indicate the location and direction of the County or private road accessing the property? 2 Yes, ____ _ 5. Are you aware that prior to submittal of a building permit application you are required to show proof of a driveway access permit or obtain a statement from the Garfield County Road & Bridge Departtnent stating one is not necessary? You can contact the Road & Bridge Department at 625-8601. , ..... \ Yes V Nl!f gt{((J lt2W f'Dte-A:ifft.tJ ~IAIJV 6. Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all reinforcing ste(ll in accordance with the IRC or per stamped engineered design? Yes v 7. Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl spaces and the clearances required between wood and earth? Yes. __ ~--- 8. Do the plans indicate the size and location of ventilation openings for the attic, roof joist spaces and soffits? Yes ,_,.....- 9. Do the plans include design loads as required by Garfield County for roof snow loads, (a minimum of 40 pounds per square foot up to & including 7,000 feet above sea level), floor loads and wing loads? Yes, __ _:_/ __ _ 10. Does the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor, and roof construction~ Yes. __ v~--- 11. Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists, wall studs, ceiling joists, roof raft~r~or joists or trusses? Yes, ____ v=._ __ 12. Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method of positive connection of all columns and beams? Yes'---~~--- 13. Does the elevation plan indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the undisturbed grade to the midpoint between the ridge and eave of a gable or shed roof or the top of a flat roof? (Building height measurement usually not to exceed 25 feet) Yes. __ __,Je:_ __ 14. Does the plan include any stove or zero clearance fireplace planned for installation including 3 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. ( 23. make and model and Colorado Phase II certifications or phase II EPA certification? Yes V v ---::--;-----;---; Does the plan include a masonry fireplace including a fireplace section indicating design to comply with the IRC? Yes / No ----- Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that egress/rescue windows from sle.:"~rooms and/or basements comply witb the requirements of the IRC? Yes No ____________ __ Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that windows provide natural light and ventila_iion for all habitable rooms? Yes ../ No ------ Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass doors, glazing immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as a walking surface; sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub enclosures and specify saf>W glazing for these areas? Yes No ------ Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces, boilers and water heaters indicated on the plan? Yes . (1!' · No _______ _ Do you understand that if you are building on a parcel of land created by the exemption process or the subdivision process, are building plans in compliance with all plat notes and/or covenants? Yes ,/ No ----- Do you understand that if you belong to a Homeowners Association (HOA), it is your responsibility to obtain written permission from the association, if required by that association, prior to submitting an application for a building permit? The building permit application will be accepted without it, but you run the risk of the HOA bringing action to enforce the covenants, which can result in revocation of permit issued. Additionally, your Plan Review fee is not refundable if the plans have been reviewed by the Building Department prior to any action by the HOA that requires either revocation or substantial modi.fication of the plans. Yes {;,/ No _____ __ Will this be the~ residential structure on the parcel? Yes /L'__ No Ifno-Explain: ____________ _ Have two (~plete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the application? Yes. ________ _ 4 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. Do you understand that the minimum dimension a home can be on a lot is 20ft. wide and 20ft. long? Yes. ___ _r:__"_ No ____ _ Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other construction code requirements? Yes V Do your plans comply with all zoning rules and regulations in the County related to your properties zone distris;t? Yes -" No _______ _ Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a final inspectio~y the Garfield County Building Department? Yes No ____ _ Do you understand that approval for design and/or construction changes are required prior to the application of these changes? v Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a "Plan Review" fee from you at the time of application submittal and that you will be required to pay the "Permit Fee" as well as any "Road Impact" or "Septic System" fees required, at the time you pick up your building permit? Yes t/ ·Are you aware that you must call in for an inspection by 3:30 the business day before the requested inspection in order to receive it the following business day? Inspections will be made from 7:30a.m. to 3:30p.m. Monday through Friday. Inspections are to be called in to 384-5003. Yes V No _____ :_ Are you aware that requesting inspections on work that is not ready or not accessible will result in a $50.00 re-inspection fee? Yes L,// No ______ _ Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the IRC including approval on a final inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy and occupancy of the building? Yes V 5 33. Are you aware that the Permit Application must be signed by the Owner or a written authority being given fora!l Agent and that the party responsible for the project must comply with the IRC? Yes v~ No ------ 34. Do you understand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed Electrician and Plumber to perform installations and hookups, unless you· as the homeowner are performing the work? The license number of the person performing the work will be required at time g.£ applicable inspection. Yes ~ No ------- 35. Are you aware, that on the front of the Building Permit Application you will need to fill in the Parcel/Schedule Number for the lot you are applying for this permit on prior to submittal of a building pe!JUit application? Your attention in this is appreciated. Yes / No _______ _ 36. Do you know that the local fire district maY require you to submit plans for their review of fire safety issues? Yes ~· No (please check with the building department about this requirement) 37. Do you understand that if you are planning on doing any excavating or grading to the property prior to issuance of a building permit that you will be required to obtain a grading permit? / · Yes V~ 38. Are you aware that if you will be connecting to a public water and/or sewer system, that the tap fees have to be the connections inspected by the service provider prior to the Issuance of Occupancy? Yes -eM=-- understand and answered these questions to the AACi'j!hf? Phone: __________ ( days); ___________ (evenings) ProjectName: __ pJ-..J>.C=-'-A"-. ·_L_· _L_(_-=-----------~--­ Project Address: __ ~·1;.::::::.,_,qc:.:( cQ""-----...:::E=c~?f-Y'-'-({""---'(D-=.=~"4· _(..::::...>..t(y""a./A=ve_,.~ ~-- Notes: If you have answered "No" on any of the questions, you may be required to provide this 6 information at the request of the Building Official prior to. beginning the plan review process. Delays in issuing the permit are to be expected. Work may not proceed without the issuance of a permit. If it is determined by the Building Official that additional information is necessary to review the application and plans to determine minimum compliance with the adopted codes, the application may be placed behind more recent applications for building permits in the review process and not reviewed until required information has been provided and the application rotates again to first position for review, delay in issuance of the permit or delay in proceeding with construction. Bpminreg November2006 7 PLAN REVIEW.CHECKLIST Applicant QCA= LLC Date I Z -1-o 1 Building ~gineered Foundation ___t,L_Driveway Permit G. pf--rJ- _Lsurveyed Site Plan ~Septic Permit and Setbacks ' . ~Grade!fopography 30% 2Attach Residential Plan Review List ~inimum Application Questionnaire _dsubdivision Plat Notes 4Fire Department Review _0 aluation Determination/Fees ~ed Line Plans/Stamps/Sticker -uL)t-Attach Conditions __ Application Signed ~an Reviewer To Sign Application LParcel/Schedule No . .l:./tL-40# Snow load Letter-Manf. Hms. / Soils Report GENERAL NOTES: Planning/Zoning __ Property Line Setbacks __ 30ft Stream Setbacks __ Flood Plain __ Building Height ~oning Sign-off t-/Jioad Impact Fees ~OA/DRC Approval __ Grade!fopography 40% 0tanning Issues v--Subdivision Plat Notes West Slope Testing & Inspection 3177 Glendam Dr. Grand Junction, CO 81504 Phone:970-434-6988 Cell: 970-260-2844 Final Inspection Report Date: 8-29-08 Project: Lot 1 & 2 Club lodge Duplexes Aspen Glen Address: 118, 120, 136, and 138 Club lodge Ln. Carbondale, CO General Contractor: Michael Pine -Builder Inc. Contractor that Performed Work: Mountain Steel Inspection of shop fabrication or field work at job site: Field Report#2 Page 1 of 1 Report: Reinspected the items noted on the 1st inspection report. Also received a copy of the letter from the structural engineer on the project in regards to the welding for the L VL/wood beam buckets & bucket to column attachments. It appeared that the structural engineer was satisfied with the size & amount of welding at these buckets & connections. The welding & high strength bolting reinspected above appeared to be in general conformance with the drawings & details, and appeared to meet the quality requirements of the A WS Dl.l Structural Welding Code and the AISC Specification for Structural Joints Using ASTM A325 or A490 Bolts. To the best of my knowledge this completes the special inspections of the welding & high strength bolting as outlined in reports #I & #2. January 2, 2008 Michael Pines Builder, Inc. P.O.Boxll99 Carbondale, CO 816213 FIRE · EMS · RESCUE RE: Clublodge at Aspen Glen 1 & 2 Dear Michael, This letter is a follow up to our conversation earlier today. It is my understanding that the Club lodge duplexes will have individual units less than 6,200 square feet and that the units will be separated by fire walls constructed in accordance with the IBC. Per the International Fire Code (IFC) Section Bl04.2, areas of buildings that are separated by fire walls constructed in accordance with the IBC in may be calculated individually for the purpose of calculating required fire flows. In this case, the building would not require an automatic fire sprinkler system. Please contact me if you have any questions or if I may be of any assistance. Bill Gavette Deputy Chief Carbondale & Rural Fire Protection District 300 Meadowood Drive • Carbondale, CO 81623 • 970-963-2491 Fax 970-963-0569 Cathi Edinger From: Andy Schwaller Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 9:02AM To: S_ubjeet~E. -ublodge Lots 1 and 2 ~ink we will hold up the Final just to promote a response. ~ :;:::::athi Edinger ~kid~a¥y,rlhllilln~e~2~7~,220~0~8iRB·~2~1~AUM4----------­ To: David Pesnichak; Andy Schwaller; Jena Thompson; Julie Taylor Subject: RE: PCA LLC -Clublodge Lots 1 and 2 David, Page 1 of 1 Thanks for the update. Amended Plat needs to be signed & recorded before we can issue a C.O. The final inspection can be done but people can't move in without mylar being recorded & C.O. issued. Right Andy! Thanks, Cathi From: David Pesnichak Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 11:25 AM To: Andy Schwaller; Cathi Edinger; Jena Thompson; Julie Taylor Subject: PCA LLC -Clublodge Lots 1 and 2 FYI: I spoke with the attorney for PCA LLC who filed and was approved for a plat amendment for Aspen Glen Clublodge Lots 1 and 2 in 2007. This plat amendment has expired and the attorney has verified that the Mylar was never sent in. There is a current active building permit for this lot. The amended plat will need to be resubmitted, approved and recorded prior to issuance of the CO (or have we been requiring this prior to final?) Thanks Dave David Pesnichak Senior Planner-Long-Range Garfield County 108 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Tel: (970) 945-8212 Fax: (970)384-3470 Email: dQesn icha k@9arfield=.coJJDJ)I. com www.g<!,[field-county"com 6/27/2008 (continue on back) ! . 106 241l0URS NOTICE REQUIRED FOR INSPECTIONS s BUILDING PERMIT GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO Date Issued.~()d1::9.± ....... Zoned Area ............................... Permit No ... \';J.}.l;:\ .. '8. .......... . AGREEMENT In consideration of the issuan..:e of this permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comp1y with all laws and regulations related to the zoning, location; construction and erection of the proposed structure for which this permit is granted, and further agrees that if the above said regulations are not fully complied with in the zoning, location, erection and construction of the above described structure, the permit may then be revoked by notice from the County Building Inspector and IMMEDIATELY BECOME NULL AND VOID. p, Use \)'1'\\t--f:, t\\)~\e,< yt;,\c\l>Vlcr;: Addcess or Leg• I DmripHon ·fu::l\\l~Q)S \t:R:II.\ -(:\QCl\e \Jin'd -'t> uOJYJwn>&orr..J:P"'C""C\'4,-""L"'lC"-----------"cQJllillJg~~\.IJD_ fulliruk~L--------~F~•·monui ______ ~SwiP~•-------~'~----~~r __________ __ This" Card Must Be Posted So It is Plainly Visible From The Street Until Final Inspection. !3X" !/r. I _," .-0~ ~ ),' v; ~/ J-• ~-~·-:?-;tn.~-2 -' .f__.,,.,.-r.-:-:::_.-. ->-" .,. '" ---~ '-" .· . 9ffeJ'Z,)K 'f-?..cl? INSPECTION RECDRD Footing ,·::.;..:.J[-!1 "iJ::.'J 1.( Driveway Foundation •/IIJ•5~~0,c;C~r:;:) ~.o\ Underground Plumbing 'f·3-0{;Wlf2. Insulation jo"J.Ci-c?f: ~ Rough Plumbing 5'·1/ -of, /(hvl. Drywall II-.s--or;;4/W. Chimney & Vent 9-\\-D~fodM. lectric Final (by S 4/.?8/tJy GasPiping Cf-1 1-t:>SfdM ina I (/? --z_.s::. & 7 ~C/' Electric Rough (By Slate Jns~ffi-$]-;:_ Septic Final Framing j(J·Itf-OZ:;/Jll:rJj(;:~.,? Notes: L.!, ,m//,;:>/<:.j;-17-0tf-wn- (To include Roof in place and indows '><r•-"d ~''-<..:-• <f.v (;-.<. k ... ·~_J"~ and Doors installed). 5'j1"!.1"'~?.. ;:=/,..,..._ OK. 6-11·</t '' .. '.2.- ALL LISTED ITEMS MUST BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE COVERING. WHETHER INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR, UNDERGROUND OR ABOVE GROUND. THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE forlnspections Cnll384-5003 108 8th Street Glenwood Springs, Colorado APPROVED Do NOT DESTROY nns CARD Date \:J,-\l}Qj By T.S. ~ IF PLACii.DCJUTSIDE ·COVER WITH CLEAR PLASTIC . , vr> . .::.>I!~•.~L-r: rAMILY AI 'J ACHED RESIDENTI/.\1. DWELLiNG UNJTS ALLOilvED \rVITHIN THIS ZONE DISTRICT, THE FOLLOWING DEVELOPMENT STAtiDARDS APPLY: I . MJNIMU1v1 LOT SIZE PER CONDOMI!vltUM STRUCTURE 2. MA.>I:IMIJM BUILDI!\IG HEIG11T ··--·--. _J? _MINIMUM LOT WIDTii 4. /\i1TI\lf1';;.1t:JM.L.Q:t.tlf"..fTb_ 5. MINIMUM SEPERATION !3elVVEE}i-Bt:JJ+.D.tN.G5_ 9GOO S.F. 25 FEET 40 FEEf I OOffET 20 FEET b. MII\.IJMUM Stl BACK. FROM PUBLIC/PRIVATE STREET OR DRIVEWAY --·--·-- 7. MAXIMUM FLOOR. AREA RATIO 8. MINIMUM Off-STREEl' Fi\RW~G FER RESIDEI>JTIAL DWELLING UNIT G\u.DLGLJC\!::_ ~~ Aspen Glen -HOA Design Review Committee Final Plan Approvalq l5kJ;J_, ' D~te Clublodge Lot 3 ' ' ) 0 FEET .5 2 SPACES FINAL .I ' = == ~= ::::::-~­~= =-' == ="-' ~ SUBMITTED FOR: STAN MATHIS LOT 1, ASPEN GLEN GARFIELD COUNTY COLORADO SOIL INVESTIGATION REPORT AUGUST 2, 2007 PROJECT# 072-0318 SUBMITTED BY: COLORADO ENGINEERING & GEOTECHNICAL GROUP, INC. 19375 BEACON LITE RD. MONUMENT, COLORADO 80132 719-488-2145 AGREEMENT OF PURPOSE AND DISCLAIMER The parties specifically agree and contract that the purpose of this soil investigation is to test, analyze, and report on the condition of the soils encountered only as these tests pertain to the suitable design and construction of an appropriate foundation for the proposed building and/ or residences to determine the load bearing capacities of the soil. The parties specifically agree that Colorado Engineering and Geotechnical Group, Inc. has not been retained nor will they render an opinion concerning environmental issues, hazardous waste or any other known or unknown conditions that may be present on this site. INTRODUCTION: This report summarizes the results of data obtained during a soils test of Lot 1, Aspen Glen, Garfield County, Colorado. Investigation occurred on July 13, 2007 and was performed in undisturbed soil in accordance with ASTM 1586-99. The purpose of the investigation was to reveal the engineering properties for foundation purposes for the proposed construction of a duplex. The site is currently vacant. Other aspects relating to the proposed construction are presented. A component document to this plan will be an Open Hole Report that will be produced after the Open Hole Inspection, which is not billed with this report. The purpose of the Open Hole Report is to determine whether any significant variation from this report and the observed condition exists and whether the foundation design will require modification. FINDINGS: The soil encountered in test-hole 1 consisted of stiff to very stiff, fine to coarse-grained, red lean clay possible artificial fill with cobbles and boulders (Unified Soil Classification System symbol CL) from the surface to the bottom of the boring at nine feet where drill refusal occurred on competent boulder and cobble. Potential for foundation movement is low. The soil encountered in test-hole 2 consisted of stiff to very stiff, fine to coarse-grained, red lean clay possible artificial fill with cobbles and boulders (Unified Soil Classification System symbol CL) from the surface to the bottom of the boring at three feet where drill refusal occurred on competent boulder and cobble. Potential for foundation movement is low. The soil encountered in test-hole 3 consisted of stiff to very stiff, fine to coarse-grained, red lean clay possible artificial fill with cobbles and boulders (Unified Soil Classification System symbol CL) from the surface to the bottom of the boring at one foot where drill refusal occurred on competent boulder and cobble. Potential for foundation movement is low. The soil encountered in test-hole 4 consisted of stiff to very stiff, fine to coarse-grained, red lean clay possible artificial fill with boulder and cobble (Unified Soil Classification System symbol CL) from the surface to the bottom of the boring at five feet where drill refusal occurred on competent boulder and cobble. Potential for foundation movement is low. Project#: 072-0318 www.cegg.ne/ Page 2 of9 The soil encountered in test-hole 5 consisted of stiff to very stiff, fine to coarse-grained, red lean clay possible artificial fill with cobbles and boulders (Unified Soil Classification System symbol CL) from the surface to the bottom of the boring at nine feet where drill refusal occurred on competent boulder and cobble. A sample of lean clay exhibited a swell potential of 1.3 percent during lab testing. Potential for foundation movement is low. Attached are graphic summaries of the boring logs of the field conditions encountered and a summary of laboratory testing results. It should be noted that the soil descriptions shown on the boring logs are based on the geologist's visual classification of the samples in the field at the depths indicated. Actual subsurface soil conditions may vary between samples and location tested. Groundwater was not encountered in the test boring at the time of this investigation. The presence of shallow bedrock beneath surficial soils is favorable for the formation of "perched" groundwater. The depth and occurrence of groundwater can vary over time depending on hydrologic conditions such as precipitation, surface drainage, irrigation, and other conditions not apparent at the time of this report. RECOMMENDATIONS: Grading and compaction records should be reviewed to determine if the near surface soils are fill and whether they were placed in a controlled manner. Uncontrolled fill will be required to be recompacted in lifts prior to foundation placement. Maximum allowable bearing strength of the soil shall not be taken as greater than 2000 pounds per square foot for elements resting on stiff clay stone. Equivalent fluid pressures of the soil, assuming normal consolidation, may be taken as 45 pcf active and 275 pcf passive. These fluid pressure values are based on literature and were not established by site-specific laboratory testing. If the clay is determined to be more expansive during the open hole observation then a three foot over-excavation and replacement with structural fill may be required. The foundation shall rest on over-excavated and replaced materials. The depth of the over- excavation shall extend at least 3 feet below and 3 feet beyond the exterior of the foundation. The replace material shall be equivalent to Class VI or Class VII Road Base and may not include the original clay and/or otherwise unsuitable material from the excavation. Compaction of the structural material shall be at least 95% Standard Proctor Density and shall be tested by the Engineer in 12 inch lifts. If this design is utilized, maximum allowable bearing strength of the soil shall not be taken greater than 2000 pounds per square foot for elements resting on compacted structural fJ.ll. Equivalent fluid pressures of the soil, assuming normal consolidation, may be taken as 45 pcf active and 275 pcf passive. These fluid pressure values are based on literature and were not established by site-specific laboratory testing. If floor movement due to expansive soil is not acceptable. finished room floor areas should be supported on wooden or steel joists over a crawl space area. The preferred foundation design will consist of a reinforced concrete stem wall resting on a concrete footer of a size determined by the foundation engineer. Project#: 072-0318 www.cegg.net Page 3 of9 In areas of expansive and/ or otherwise unsuitable soils, the risk of movement for foundation components resting on over-excavated and replaced materials, caissons or resistance piers, is minimized, but not negated. The soil bearing strength above is subject to change based in observations made at the open-hole inspection. Owners shall be made aware of this report and the fact that water accumulation around foundation elements is the primary cause of foundation distress. The preferred foundation design will consist of reinforced concrete stem wall resting on a concrete footer of a size determined by the foundation engineer. If floor movement due to expansive soils is not acceptable, fmished room floor areas should be supported on wood or steel floor joists, or a structural concrete slab, over a properly ventilated crawl space area. SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION: The preferred foundation design will consist of a reinforced concrete stem wall resting on a concrete footer of a size determined by the foundation engineer. Depth of foundation elements shall be determined by the foundation engineer, but should be at least as deep as the minimum depth required by the governing building authority. Concrete slabs shall be free floating and isolated from load-bearing elements. Partition walls, utility and HVAC connections shall be capable of a minimum of 1-1/2 inches of movement of the foundation and slab. An attached detail sheet diagrams a typical floating wall design. The soil bearing strength above is subject to change based on observations made at the open-hole inspection. Owners shall be made aware of the contents of this report and the fact that water accumzt!ation around foundation elements is the primary cause of foundation distress. FOUNDATION DESIGN: This report is not a foundation design. The foundation design engineer will determine the exact configuration of foundation elements, to include footer (if any) width and thickness, wall thickness and height, pad and pier sizes and reinforcement schedules. However, the foundation should be designed for a ten-foot free span. This report does not address general hillside stability, landslide potential, or other natural hazards. Several areas of the Colorado Front Range have known geologic hazards associated with them. We recommend that readers of this report further educate themselves as to the existence of geologic hazards on or around their specific property of interest. Colorado Engineering can assist in the development of site specific assessments of Geologic hazards. The Colorado Geologic Survey {www.dnr.state.co.us/geosurvey or 303-866-2611} is a good source for publications (maps, reports, etc.) dealing with specific geologic issues and/ or issues related to specific geographic areas. FIELD INVESTIGATION PROCEDURE: Exploratory borings were advanced using a four-inch nominal diameter, truck-mounted continuous- flight auger. The approximate boring locations are indicated on the attached site diagram and were Project#: 072-0318 www.cegg.,et Page 4 of9 established in the field by pacing and measuring angles from identifiable site references. The Builder designated the location for exploration. At depths determined by the supervising geologist, samples were obtained by means of a two-inch diameter split-spoon sampler, advanced by a 140-pound drop- hammer falling a distance of 30 inches, in general compliance with ASTM D-1586. The number of hammer blows required to advance the sampler provides an indication of the in-situ relative density of the soil, and in combination with the laboratory analysis of the soil, provides data required for derivation of the engineering properties sought by this exploration. EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS AND WEATHER: The general topography around the site of this investigation is flat with no discernible slope. Vegetation consists of native grasses & weeds. Weather was warm & clear. The elevation measured at 6,000 feet above sea level. SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE: Foundation drain requirements shall be determined at the open-hole observation; however, drains around any below-grade useable space, including crawl spaces, should be anticipated. See the attached detail sheet. SURFACE DRAINAGE: The excavation shall be protected from surface runoff and excess precipitation during construction. After backfilling, the soil around the foundation shall be graded away from the structure at a minimum slope of six inches over ten feet. Gutters and downspouts shall be installed to carry water across the area disturbed by construction. Areas that settle shall be backfilled to prevent ponding of water. No vegetation requiring irrigation shall be installed within five feet of the foundation. Water from uphill shall be diverted around the structure. The future owners are cautioned against the installation of a lawn sprinkler system within 5 feet of the foundation walls. If a sprinkler system is installed, the sprinkler heads should be placed so that water spray from the heads under full pressure does not fall within five feet of the foundation walls. Lawn irrigation should be controlled to prevent excess wetting of subsurface soils. Lawn, flowers, shrubs, and other plantings within five feet of the foundation walls should be hand watered and this watering should be minimized. If a drip irrigation system is used, one should limit the amount of water to sustain the plantings. One is also advised that any irrigation line can leak and/ or break, releasing excessive amounts of water near foundations and can cause damage to slabs and foundation walls. BACKFILL: Any soil disturbed adjacent to bearing foundation components shall be re-compacted to a minimum of 85% Standard Proctor Density. Soil supporting concrete slabs shall be compacted to 95% Standard Proctor Density. Mechanical compaction methods shall be utilized; water-flooding techniques are prohibited. See Compaction Section for more information regarding compaction requirements and techniques. Project#: 072-0318 www.cegg.net Page 5 of9 CONCRETE: All concrete shall be Type II, Sulfate Resistive, with 28-day strength requirements determined by the foundation design engineer. EXTERIOR AND INTERIOR CONCRETE SLABS: Accepted geotechnical practice in the Colorado Front Range region utilizes a standardized scale to evaluate the risk of slab-on-grade movement relative to the swell potential of the native soils. The foUowing information is given as reference only and doest not imply approval for the use of slabs on grade. Risk Category Low Moderate High Very High Percent Swell at 1000 psf Surcharge Oto <2 2 to <4 4 to <6 Greater than 6 While the above chart provides a general indication of the risk of slab movement, it should be noted that other soil conditions may exist, and that the geotechnical engineer considers more than just the expansion of the soil when making slab and foundation recommendations. Colorado Engineering and Geotechnical Group, Inc. does not accept any responsibility for future damage incurred by the heaving of interior slabs bearing on native materials or imported materials. Excess moisture in the soil and improper compaction under slabs will increase the possibility of slab heave, settlement and cracking. The builder and future owners should be aware of and understand that there is a definite risk of future damage with any slab-on-grade construction. If floor movement due to expansive soils is not acceptable, finished room floor areas should be supported on wooden or steel joists over a crawl space area, or on a reinforced concrete slab. If the builder and future owners are willing to accept the definite risk of some damage due to concrete floor slab movement, the following recommended details will help prevent, but not guarantee, wetting of the soils underneath the slabs and minimize damage when wetting of the soil does occur. Do not place a gravel layer beneath the concrete slab, unless specified by the foundation engineer. The slab should be placed on the undisturbed native soils, or well-compacted fill. Interior concrete slabs shall be isolated from the foundation, utility lines and non-bearing partition walls. Separate the slab from all load bearing members and utility lines of at least one-half inch to allow for independent movement of the slab. Provide a positive control or slip joint at the construction joint between the slab and foundation walls Slabs shall have control joints at approximately ten feet on center each way to lessen the possibility of random cracking. These control joints may be installed as construction joints, saw cuts and/ or scoring of the slabs. Cuts should be made at least '/, the total thickness of the slab. A good quality concrete Project#: 072~0318 www.cegg.net Page 6 of9 sealant should be installed in these joints to prevent surface discharges of water from penetrating slab sub grades. A minimum void or clear space of three inches should be provided at the bottom of all non- bearing partitions and furring strips placed over the concrete slabs (see Floating Wall Detail). One should also provide a one-half inch space at the bottom of all door jambs to allow for limited movement of the floor slab. The owner is hereby notified that it is there responsibility to maintain these void spaces. In the event a hot water heating system is used, the pipe should not be placed beneath the concrete floor slab. In the event a forced air furnace is used, a two-inch collapsible connection should be provided between the furnace and the heat ducts. The soils that will support the concrete slabs should be kept moist during construction by occasionally sprinkling water and especially a day or two prior to pouring of the slab. This procedure will help maintain the moisture content of the underlying soil. In addition to the above recommendations, another means with which to reduce the risk of movement and cracking to slab-on-grade construction would be to over-excavate the below slab soil two or more feet, replace with compacted structural fill material, pour the concrete slab six inches thick with a reinforcing mat of #4/60 bars at 18 inches each way. RADON: There is not believed to be any unusual hazard from naturally occurring sources of radioactivity at the site. However, most counties in Colorado have average radon levels (measured in homes) above the U.S. EPA recommended "action level" of 4 picoCuries per liter of air (pCi/1). For instance, Teller County averages 31.94 pCi/1, Park County averages 8.28 pCi/1, El Paso County averages 4.73 pCi/1, and Douglas County averages 7.53 pCi/1. Results of a 1987-1988 EPA-supported radon study for Colorado indicate that the granitic rocks, in particular, generally have elevated levels of uranium. These rocks have the potential of producing higher than average radon gas levels in homes. Providing increased ventilation of basements and crawl spaces and sealing of joints can mitigate build-ups of radon gas. This mitigation is best implemented during the design and construction phases of residences. The Colorado Geologic Survey {www.dnr.state.co.us/geosurvey} and the U.S. EPA {www.epa.gov /iaq/radon} are both good sources for additional information regarding radon. OPEN-HOLE OBSERVATION: It is necessary to assume the soil in the surrounding area will be siruilar to that which was observed in this initial investigation. However, variations across the test borings and site can and do occur. Therefore, it is required that a qualified soil engineer inspect the completed foundation excavation prior to the placement if any foundation component to determine whether any significant IJariation from this report exists and whether the foundation design will require modification. Please contact this office a minimum if 24 hours in advance to schedule a representative to observe the completed excavation. The open-hole observation is not included as part if the soil report and is subject to an inspection foe. Failure to obtain this required inspection prior to placement of foundation elements renders this report and its recommendations null and void. Project#: 072-0318 www.cegg.net Page 7 of9 COMPACTION: If compaction of the native or borrow soils is required, it is highly recommended that you pick up an informative brochure provided at any Colorado Engineering and Geotechnical Group, Inc. office. In general, to compact clayey or silty materials: Placing Fill: No brush, sod, frozen material, or other perishable or unsuitable material, or stones of four inches or greater in maximum dimension shall be placed in the fill. The distribution of the material on the fill shall be such as to avoid the formation of lenses, or layers, of material differing substantially in characteristics from the surrounding material. The materials shall be delivered to the backfill surface at a uniform rate, and in such quantity as to permit a satisfactory construction procedure. Unnecessary concentration of travel tending to cause ruts and other hollows more than six inches in depth, shall be regarded and compacted. After dumping of fill material on backfill surfaces, the material shall be spread by approved methods in approximately 6 inches compacted thickness. Moisture Control.· The material in each layer shall be compacted by rolling and shall contain the optimum moisture required for maximum compaction, as nearly as practicable and as determined by the soils engineer. The moisture content shall be uniform throughout the layers. The contractor may be req1nred to add the necessary moisture to the backfill material in the borrow area, If in the opinion of the soils engineer, it is not possible to obtain moisture content by adding water on the fill surface. Compaction: When the moisture content and condition of each spread layer is satisfactory, it shall be compacted by a method approved by the soils engineer to 90% ASTM D698 (Standard Proctor Density) for slab areas, and 100% ASTM D698 for footing and/ or pad areas. A Standard Proctor test shall be performed for each typical fill material and frequent tests of the density of the fill must be taken. Normally, eight passes of a sheepsfoot roller loaded to 4,000 pounds per lineal foot on a six inch soil layer is sufficient to achieve 90% ASTM D698. In general, to compact cohesionless free-draining materials: Note: The above guidelines also apply When compacting cohesionless free-draining materials such as sands and gravel, the materials shall be deposited in layers and compacted by treads of a crawler type tractor, surface of internal vibrators, smooth or pneumatic rollers, hand or power tampers, or by any other means approved by the soils engineer. The thickness of the horizontal layer after compaction shall not exceed 6 inches compacted thickness if compaction is performed by tractor treads, surface vibrators or similar equipment, or not more than penetrating length of the vibrator head if compaction is performed by internal vibrators. The material may not be ponded or flooded to aid in the compaction only if free draining materials underlies new fill unless specifically recommended by the Engineer. When the moisture content and condition of each spread layer is satisfactory, it shall be compacted by a method approved by the soils engineer to 90% ASTM D1557 (Modified Proctor Density) for slab areas, and 95% ASTM D1557 for footing and/ or pad areas. If compaction testing is to be performed by Colorado Engineering & Geotechnical Group, Inc. we will require a Proctor Curve, Standard or Modified (which ever is appropriate for the material tested), from an approved testing facility. Colorado Engineering & Geotechnical Group, Inc., if requested, will Project#: 072-0318 www.cew.1zet Page 8 of9 perform this test(s) for you, provided a sample of the material(s), 5-gallon bucket(s) full, be supplied to Colorado Engineering & Geotechnical Group, Inc. a minimum of 72 hrs prior to testing. The sample(s) will be used to determine the maximum proctor density and optimum moisture content for that representative sample. Additional charges will be incurred for each sample tested and for field compaction testing operations if required. CONCLUSIONS: This report is valid only for the use of the client for the type of construction listed above. Use by any other is prohibited, as is the use for other types of construction without the express, written permission of this office. Property owners and builders are reminded that water accumulation around foundation elements is a primary cause of structural distress in homes. Foundation movement under any condition can be minimized by maintaining a stable moisture content of the soil supporting the foundation. Surface drainage is paramount to minimizing the potential for water to penetrate backfill to the level of the foundation. If water penetrates through to the soil supporting the foundation, movement is likely. Any movement that does occur should be less than 1". LIMITATIONS: This report and its recommendations do not apply to any other site other than the one described herein and are predicated on the assumption that the actual soil conditions do not deviate in any significant way from those described in this report. In the event that any variations or undesirable conditions are detected during the construction phase or if the proposed construction varies from that planned as of this report date, the owner shall immediately notify Colorado Engineering and Geotechnical Group, Inc., so that supplemental recommendations can be provided, if needed. Project#: 072-0318 www cegg.ltet Page 9 of9 Summary of Laboratory Testing Job Number 072-0318 Natural Passing Blow Count Swell at Natural Dry Liquid LimiU Soil Description Test Hole Depth (ft) Moisture #200 Sieve (Blows/Inch) 1000 psf Density (pcf) Plasticity (USCS Symbol) (%) (%) (%) Index 1 4 11.5 94.5 21/12 NT 109.4 38/20 Lean Clay (CL) 4 5 9.6 55.3 Bounce NT NT 29/6 Lean Clay/Silt (CLIML) 5 9 10.3 57.6 Bounce 1.30% NT 33/18 Lean Clay (CL) NG: 1 DATE: 07/1 ... -u. ~ j:; 0 --z ... w ::) w u. a: 0 D. -::) u > :1: ... ;r:: ... ... Ill ... D. 0 0 0 w ... SOIL DESCRIPTION Cl == ID Ill LEAN CLAY W/BOULDERS 8c COBBLES* GRAIN: FINE -COARSE CONSISTENCY: STIFF -VERY STIFF 2 MOISTURE: LOW-MODERATE CLAY: LOW-MODERATE PLASTICITY:LOW-MODERATE COLOR: 4 21 CL 6 12 8 *MAY BE ARTIFICIAL FILL. 10 DRILL REFUSAL OCCURRED AT A 12 DEPTH OF 9' ON BOULDER/ COBBLE. 14 16 18 20 B RING LOG J06 #, 072·0318 G: DATE: 07/13/2007 ... -u. ?fl. j:; --z ... w ::) w u. a: 0 D. -::) u ~ :1: ... ;r:: ... !!! ... D. 0 0 0 w ... SOIL DESCRIPTION Cl == ID Ill 0-3 LEAN CLAY LDERS 8c COBBLES* GRAIN: fiNE-COARSE CONSISTENCY: STIFF -VERY STIFF 2 MOISTURE: LOW-MODERATE CLAY: LOW-MODERATE PLASTICITY: LOW-MODERATE COLOR: Y BE ARTIFICIAL FILL. DRILL REFUSAL OCCURRED AT A DEPTH OF 3' ON BOULDER/ COBBLE. 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 1"1515 6eocon Lite Rd. Monument, C.O 80152 (11"1) 488-2145 DATE: 07/13/2007 SOIL DESCRIPTION 0-1 LEAN CLAY & COBBLES* GRAIN: FINE -COARSE CONSISTENCY: STIFF -VERY STIFF MOISTURE: LOW-MODERATE CLAY: LOW-MODERATE PLASTICITY: LOW-MODERATE COLOR: BE ARTIFICIAL FILL. BORI G :z: ... IL w Cl 6 8 10 12 14 20 ... -II. ~ j;:: 0 z -w :;) w II: 0 IL :;) u >-... ~ ... fl) .... 0 0 0 .... 2 Ill fl) JOEl #, 072·0318 DATE: 07/13/2007 LEAN CLAY & COBBLES* GRAIN: FINE -COARSE CONSISTENCY: STIFF -VERY STIFF MOISTURE: LOW-MODERATE CLAY: LOW-MODERATE PLASTICITY: LOW-MODERATE COLOR: *MAY BE ARTIFICIAL FILL. REFUSAL OCCURRED AT A OF 5' ON BOULDER/ -~ 0 -w II: :;) ... fl) 0 2 10 12 16 18 20 ... II. j;:: z :;) 0 u ~ 0 .... Ill w IL ~ .... 0 fl) CL ML 1'1:315 6eac.on Lite Rei. Monument, C.O 801:32 (ll"!) 488-2145 BOR G LOG STAN MATHIS LOT 1. ASPEN 5 DATE: 07/1 SOIL DESCRIPTION LEAN CLAY W /BOULDERS &: COBBLES* GRAIN: FINE-COARSE f -:r: ~ w Q CONSISTENCY: STIFF -VERY STIFF 2 MOISTURE: LOW-MODERATE CLAY: LOW-MODERATE LOW-MODERATE DRILL REFUSAL OCCURRED AT A OF 9' ON BOULDER/ 4 6 8 BE ARTIFICIAL FILL. 1 0 ''"''~LL RESULTS OF 9' SAMPLE, 12 1.3% SWELL POTENTIAL I ULII<I~IG LAB TESTING. 14 16 18 20 JOE> #, 072·0318 1"1315 Beacon Lite Rei. Monument, C.O 80132 (11"1) 488-2145 COLORADO ENGINEERING AND GEOTECHNICAL GROUP, INC. GRADATION TEST RESULTS HYDROMETER ANALYSIS SIEVE ANALYSIS 24 HR 7 HR TIME READINGS U. S. STANDARD SERIES CLEAR SQUARE OPENINGS 45 MIN 15 MIN 60 19 4 1MIN 200 100 50 40 30 i6 10 8 4 3 8" 3/4" 1-1/2" 3" 5" 6" 8" 1 ::r·=···-·-.. ~·-·.···±···.·.·~--··.·f·····~·········2~8~S~~~l~8~~E§~#·±··t±#·8·±··.~·····t···+······±·····E+rr~~~2D~+~~~-~-········~o r ········.·············· ··-·~ . ·-···· ~, 20 80 0 70 z ·: ' :t I ··: 30 a .:::::·:: .::[<::::::.::::::::::: ~ ... . .. 40 < .,. !-~ 60 <: ·····:::·:···:··::·.·:: ········ CL :······················ iS! ~50 CJ ::::::::-::·::::::·:: .. ,::: .. ::. 50 I- u ········:···:········ ::::::::··· I 85 40 CL 30 70 20 80 1 0 ---·-··· ::: . .... ... .. 90 0 11·::. '-=·=,· t··;:;_-. · ·:;.·:..:.;;·4· C:i'i·~-=':. ·=·· ·=~· _ .. ~;::-:.:;: ··;:;·•~~=-c· _"'·· t1 ':;.·_·_··r:·:.J; ···=·;:;· ··::::· 4. ·=:·~~ .-·J· ·,:;.';c''u .. · J·;==' .•.. ····~· d;.L, ... :,r .. :J. ~-·*'·~·· t:E. 41 ·::: ·· .·.=· .$··=·· '':.:;· ··c,.;L·~· ···c:,··g ....li· .. --r=_····t~~· 1=''·;; ·· · ;=.'4 ':-; I;:;;;:···: 100 .001 .002 .005 .009 .019 .037 .074 .149 .297 .42 .59 1.19 2 2.38 4.76 9.52 19.1 38.1 76.2 127 152 200 DIAMETER OF PARTICLE IN MILLIMETERS SAND CLAY TO SILT COARSE FINE MEDIUM GRAVEL FINE COARSE COBBLES CLASSIFICATION CL NOTES: 11.5 % Moisture Content GRAVEL 0.0 % LL=38 SAND 5.5 % PL=18 FINES 94.5 % P1=20 BLOWS 21112 HOLE# DEPTH 5 Job Numbec 072-0318 HYDROMETER ANALYSIS SIEVE ANALYSIS 24 HR 7 HR TIME READINGS U, S. STANDARD SERIES CLEAR SQUARE OPENINGS .....•. ' .:::.:.. ·······•···· ..... 1 ::~M~I~N~15~M~I~N~6~0~~19~~~4~··~·!·1!1M~IZNi2i0~0~····!····~1~0~~-1 ..... ~5~0~~:~.4~!0~3!01!1··,··,··~1~··,·~~~~:1:~0li8i .... 1 ____ 1 ..... 1 ........... 1.4;······~···.····l·:3·!···.·.··~8~"~····3··~/··~4;"~1~-~1/~······l;2·····~···":.:~3i"i5i"l6l.,!.l-·~8"~0 80 . : i.. 20 ~::~--~----~·~·p·=··~-~--l····=~~----~···-~·-··~··•t·· .. =·-·._···~-·-······--~····-·•l····~·~····-~··J.~··;···.j···~-f~=·~~~-····-:rt~-····J··£:=t···~····•·~!~~j.-·-p··=·~···=·~--~-t=t=-··~·····t··=l~-~··-~-~---~-·-~~·::i 0: . ••. . I~. I .. • . w CL f-.... 0:: ;~ 50~ tJ 1 1 .. -. --·-··:.......... :::, .. , .. :_· ...... ,. i-:· )I .. :,·: ...... ········ ······:·:. .... l;' .·.·:.·•.••-••••• ~ ffi~ · 60oc CL .•...... ·::·1.1111_ •..•................ :·.::::: . ••••••••••.•.••.••..•. :r 30___ ~70 201 ... ····· ··: .. ::: ....... : ..• 1.. . .......... ,.1 I: : ........... ··········1··················1······~·. ::: 100 r~;·-~--~~---~········~---·~·-·········•i····•••·:~··.····~----~-~;~~~~ ··1····~--~-···~······~········~·-···~······ ~-··········-~---·~-~-····-~-~---;·····~i~ ··'!~;·······~······~·;m~~~-··J····.~········-~·-·······~·--····j·····~········· -~---~-~·-········~~-i -;~ ~~-~--~······:: [ .................... 100 .001 .002 .005 .009 .019 .037 .074 .149 .297 .42 .59 1.19 2 2.38 4.76 9.52 19.1 38.1 76.2 127 152 200 DIAMETER OF PARTICLE IN MILLIMETERS SAND CLAY TO SILT FINE ME01UM COARSE CLASSIFICATION CUML GRAVEL 12.0 % SAND 32:7 % FINES 55.3 % BLOWS GRAB HOLE# 4 DEPTH 5 NOTes: 9.6 % Moisture Content LL=29 PL=23 Pl-6 Job Numbec 072-0318 FINE COARSE COBBLES COLORADO ENGINEERING AND GEOTECHNICAL GROUP, INC. GRADATION TEST RESULTS HYDROMETER ANALYSiS 24 HR 7 HR TiME READINGS U. S. STANOARO SERiES 45 MIN '15 MiN 60 19 4 1MIN 200 100 50 40 .30 16 10 8 4 CLEAR SQUARE OPENiNGS 3 8" 3/4" ·, -1 /2'' 3" 5" 6" 8" 100 ....•.•.•• : •. ::::·· ....... :.:.··:::····· .·:·.:·:······ ······ . . ..... .. ····.·. t> I ...... ··::::: I ·.:·:.. _I .............. . 0 90 .•........ I ·······:·.·· I i . . . . I ; ···.···•·•·. I .. ..... . I 10 ..• ::.: ...... ::.::.: .. ·•·········· . (... . • ! ~· ············· .. ..... ••••• . ... : ....... ····· ..... :..... : • so ... .. . ..... ···:· . .. . .... .. .... .... . . I .--~ . I 20 70 ... :........... . ············· 30 0 ~ ·· .. · • . • : I ·····. • • •..•••.....•.... . . • ·:·.·:·:.··.·.······k<· •I . .. .•.... . I !··. .•... ..... . I... ••. .. ······ I.. l ·•···· ~ ~ 60 40 ~ o.. ·······: · :.··.·.··: . ···.· :. ····· · I _: ····.·:·· : : : •t.. ~ ..... ·:::· .:: I · :·. i . · ··· ···· •.. · · .:···· . ··· ........ l i ····.·: .·.·.• :oi ~so so~ ~ I. :·· . • .. } . :::: •. I l :: • . I ·······.·•··••·•·•• .···:·.·:. •• •••• • . • • I .•• i3 ffi~ 60~ 0. •·•·•··.····· 1·· .. ···.·•·· . • I : . . • ::: . .·· ••• • . • .••••• .: . > I" Cl •• ·.·::······ •...•... ··t . .. .. .. . .... ···.·:· .. ·· ·. ...... .-1 . :. .. it . ··, ····-·· ••• l .. ····.•··•·•·· ... '· ......... ·.:· ... ·.:1········.:.···· ··•·• :::·.:·.·· ··•······ .. · I_······: .. :· .. :·.··. •·•·•· .. ·t .· •..•.•• : 70 80 . ···~·······:·.·.······· .•.•..... :. ....... _ .. · .. ·········1 ..•.... --~ .. . ' ·•···••••••·.· .. ·..•.••. ·•···.······1···.•.-.···········! •·•· .• · ...•.•....• ···.·.·••··••••·····. l ::;·.:· 10 0 ............ • .. ••:• .001 .002 .005 .009 .019 .037 CLAY TO SILT CLASSIFICATION CL GRAVEL 15.0 % SAND 27.3 % FINES 57.6 % BLOWS GRAB HOLE# 5 DEPTH : •....... .074 .149 .297 .42 ,59 1.19 DIAMETER OF PARTICLE iN SAND FINE MEDIUM 90 ········ 1: : ··.··.····.·····•·· ·t 100 38.1 76.2 127 152 200 2 2.38 4.76 9.52 19.1 MILLIMETERS GRAVEL COARSE FINE COARSE COBBLES NOTES: 10.3 % Moisture Content LL=33 PL= 15 PI= 18 9 Job Number.072-0318 -------·---- 5.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 a; ~ 1.0 -0 0 --o f!. c: -o 0.0 ·-C:;~ " "' "" \,= .. 0 -1.0 11. 0 c 0 () -2.0 -3.0 -4.0 -5.0 100 ., G) c ;a m w . . .. ·+··· W terA de< ---p\-'l · toSamp1.;...-V .... Swell under constant pressure due to wetting 1000 Load ( psf) 10000 Sample of Lean Clay from test hole # § at depth l!._feet Natural Moisture Content 10.3% JOB NUMBER: 072-0318 100000 0 10 20 30 40 50 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET SCALE: 1"' =50' I \ \ \ \ \ FLAT GRASSES & WEEDS \ \ \ \ , \ \ \\ ;t \ \ SLOPE 15·20% \ \ \ \ ' ' 4 \. " r TH-1 -$- GPS: N3U026'11.7" W10?015'32.2 .. ~ ELECTRIC BOX ENISINEER'S STATEMENT 'I'M$ f't..M $ ~ ON. 'f TO DB'II;T ltE LOC.A110N OF '1'1£ f'E.D 'OATA ~T10H5 N1D DOl$ NOT~ A 5ITE f"LNt. IT StW.L. ttn ee U5EP 16A twTE f'l.Nt OR.f'OR ~~ ~ ~ ISGUPten' M$ U!li!P TO m1!lltMJrE nE ~T10te OF 'M! EXlSTIM& P!A1WI!!5. 111!: ~'nC:lM ~ M5 ODTADeP U!11M5 A !lfUn'ON ~ 1IWeiT Nr> l"ll!lD JoEtl4lliREI ens. AL.lHGlUOH re l!l!1..leVI! M ~TION OBT'AIIED N'nfN Ttft! t::lOCI.M!tfT I& )r(;Q.RATf! fOR fT5 INft!lr£lB) ~ J'IE ~ 'f r!XPfl!!9& lW.T 'JMI& I& HOT A SI.RVEY', sne fi'L.AA OR~ P1.AH NfD !~HALL NOT ee li!I!D 16 SJGK. M'S~TIOteNG!!~ ~Tf!I!IJI' NI!I:.NOT~. J06 #, 072-0318 ' ~ ~,~~ -..::.~" " " " ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '' ' ..... ' ..... ..... -------------------- MONUMENT OFFICE 1"!615 Beacon Lite Rd. Monum"nt, CO eoi62 (11"1) 4ee-2145 4-1/2" BOd SPIKE ® B2" o.c.. PRE-DRILL NAIL HOLES---..._ DO NOT C.AULK T<'lf"-' EDGE OF MOLDING. NAIL MOLDING TO STATIONARY BOTTOM PLATE ONLY. DO NOT ATTAC.H TO FLOATING PLATE. NOTES: <1 <1 <1 ---2X4 li'!ALL STUDS ---1!2" DRYii'IALL FLOATING PLATE MOLDING STATIONARY BOTTOM PLATE 1/2" DRYii'IALL SHIM _.--1~11\JISHED FLOOR C.ONC.RETE SLAB 1. NAIL MOLDING TO STATIONARY BOTTOM PLATE ONLY. DO NOT ATTACH TO FLOATING PLATE. 2. DO NOT CAULK THE TOP EDGE OF MOLDING. 3. PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 1-1/2" OF FLOAT BETI"eEN PLATES. 4. DRYii'IALL SHOULD NOT EXTEND 6ELO~ THE LOI"eR EDGE OF THE FLOATIN<!7 PLATE. MAINTAIN A 1-1/.2" c!7AP 6ETI"eEN THE LOI"eR EDGE OF THE DRYii'!ALL AND THE TOP EDGE OF THE DRYii'!ALL SHIM. 5. PROVIDE AT LEAST A 1/2" FLOAT 6ETI"eEN THE BOTTOM OF DOOR FRAMES AND THE FLOOR SLA6. 6. FAILURE TO PROPERLY INSTALL THE FLOATIN<!7 li'!ALL C.AN LEAD TO li'IARPED DOOR FRAMES, AND C.RACKINGo IN li'!ALLS THROUGH OUT THE ENTIRE STRUCTURE. FLOATING WALL STAN MATHIS LOT1.ASPEN J06 #, 072-0318 FOUNDATION i'W..L. SPREAD FOOTING TYPE COMPACTED FIL.L. (e5% OF Dl551) WALL ON GRADE TYPE EXPANSION JOINT FOOTINGo FIL. TER FABRIC PL.ACE TOP OF PIPE BEL.Oi"' BOTTOM OF FOOTINGo OR i"'AL.L. AT "HIGoH POINT" GoRAYEL. -MINIMUM TO 4" ABOVE PIPE ---,fNI'----5 OR 4" I> PERFORATED ).11~-a.:io! RIGoiD PVC. PIPE MINIMUM 45 DEG-REES FROM FOOTINGo POL. YETHYL.ENE FIL.M' MOP TO i"'AL.L. AND CARRY BENEATH GoRAYEL. AND PIPE I. Grovel size sholl not be less thon 1/2" In cilometer onci not greoter thon I 1/2" In cilometer. 2. Dlometer of perforoteci pipe vorles i"ilth omount of seepoge expected, three Inch cilometer Is most common. :3. Pipe sholl be lolci ot o minimum grocie of I" In 10'. 4. Outfoll to be unobstructed, grovlty outfoll. Dlschorge portion of pipe sholl be non perforoteci post oreo to be cirolneci. Oi"iner Is responsible to molntoln cioylightlng of ciroln. 5. Exterior eorth bockflll moterlol should be compocteci to ot leost FL.OOR MINIMUM 45 DEGoi<EES FROM I'W..L. ON GoRADE e>5% moxlmum stonciorci proctor density In the upper three feet of fill. b. Fllter fobrlc shoJI be mlrofl 140 s or equlvolent. 1. Droln pipe sholl be lolci beloi"i oreo serviced or protected, os shol"'n In cietoll obove. e. Mop polyethylene film to i"!oll onci corry beneoth grovel onci pipe. "!. The polyethylene film sholl be continued to the edge of the excovotlon. NOTE: CONTACT THIS OFFICE FOR DENSITY TESTING. PERIMETER FOUNDATION DRAIN Oi"'NER/ElUIL.DER,STAN MATHIS J06 #, 072·0318 JOB ADDRESS, LOT 1, ASPEN GLEN MONUMENT OFFICE 1"1315 6eocon Lite Rei. Monument, C.O e>OI32 (11"1) 4e>e>-2145 Parcel Detail Page 1 of3 Garfield County Assessor/Treasurer Parcel Detail Information 8§§\'?~~QI!IIeaSlJieLPmpertYSe<m::h I Assessor SJlbSeLQmay I Assessor Sales Search C!er!~&ReeDI4''TReeeP1iQnSean::h Basic Building Characteristie_s I I<lli_Infonnation Parcel Detail I Value Detail Sales Detail I Residential/Commercial Improvement Detail Land Detail I Photographs I TaxArea II Account Number II Parcel Number II Mill Levy I I o32 II R005685 II 239319173001 II 67.224 I Owner Name and Mailing Address IPCA,LLC I IPOBOX7928 I IASPEN, CO 81612 I Legal Description ISECT,TWN,RNG:l9-7-88 SUB:ASPEN GLEN jCLUBLODGE LOT: 1 SUC:R820124 BK:0966 IPG:0686 BK:0966 PG:0682 BK:0925 IPG:0345 BK:0918 PG:0408 BK:0904 IPG:0724 BK:0887 PG:0824 BK:0849 I jPG:0695 BK:0846 PG:0615 BK:0835 IPG:0364 BK:0835 PG:0305 BK:0831 IPG:0544 BK:0818 PG:0326 BK:0779 IPG:0484 BK:0703 PG:Ol21 BK: 1900 IPG:0577 RECPT:718620 BK: 1392 PG:563 IRECPT:611892 BK:0921 PG:0661 Location Physical Address: !lcARBONDALE Subdivision: !IASPEN GLEN CLUBLODGE II http://www .garcoact.comlassessor/parcel.asp ?ParcelN umber=23931917300 1 11/19/2007 Parcel Detail Page 2 of3 I Land Acres: 110.301 I I Land Sq Ft: llo I Section II Township II Range I I 19 II 7 II 88 I Property Tax Valuation Information II Actual Value II Assessed Value I I Land: II 300,56011 87,1601 I Improvements: II oil ol I Total: II 300,56011 87,1601 Sale Date: 1/312/2007 Sale Price: 11725,000 Basic Building Characteristics Number of Residential !o I Buildings: Number of Commllnd lo I Buildings: No Building Records Found Tax Information Tax Year Transaction Type II Amount I 2006 Tax Payment: Whole II ($5,984.28)1 2006 Tax Amount II $5,984.281 2005 I Tax Payment: Whole II ($6,010.54)1 2005 II Tax Amount $6,010.541 2004 Tax Payment: Whole ($5,207 .26)1 2004 Tax Amount $5,207.261 2003 Interest Payment ($167.24)1 2003 Interest Charge $167.241 2003 Tax Payment: Whole ($4, 180.92)1 2003 Tax Amount $4,180.921 2002 II Tax Payment: Whole II ($3,584.80)1 I 2002 II Tax Amount II $3,584.801 I 2001 II Tax Payment: Whole II ($3,412.58)1 http://www .garcoact.cornlassessor/parcel.asp?ParcelNumber=23931917300 1 11119/2007 Parcel Detail 2001 II Tax Amount I $3,412.581 2000 II Interest Payment ($38.33)1 2000 II Interest Charge $38.331 2000 II Tax Payment: Whole I ($3,833.08)1 2000 II Tax Amount II $3,833.081 1999 II Tax Payment: Whole II ($406.90)1 1999 II Tax Amount II $406.901 T.Qp ofPa~ Assessor Database Search Options I Treasurer Database Search Options Clerk & Recorder Database S.em:Q!LQ:ptions Garfield County HQ!lle_l'l:!ge Page 3 of3 The Garfield County Assessor and Treasurer's Offices make every effort to collect and maintain accurate data. However, Good Turns Software and the Garfield County Assessor and Treasurer's Offices are unable to warrant any of the information herein contained. Copyright © 2005 -2006 Good Turns Software. All Rights Reserved. Database & Web Design by Q_(Lo.d_Iurns_SoftwM""'· http://www .garcoact.com/assessor/parcel.asp?Parce!Number=23931917300 1 11/19/2007