Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Application-Permit
I Garfield County Building & Planning Department 108 8th Street, Suite #401 Glenwood Springs, Co. 81601 Office:970·945·8212 Fax: 970·384-3470 Inspection Line: 970·384-5003 Building Permit No. \0()36 ·····--··------ Parcel No: 2393-194-01-052 '"----- Locality: __ --·~ ___ f3()aring FQ~:k Mesa flg#2, Lo'"""t 4:_::8 __ Job Address: 22 Fenwick Carbondale -----~----~~,~~~~~~~==--~----"---· Use of Building: --·----"s=-'/f-"w'"'/o.pen & co~ered patios & att ga_r~ag~e _____ _ Owner: Contractor: Gruenefeldt, Dan "" ·"·""----- Fees: Plan Check: $ 1,868.98 Septic: Bldg Permit: $ 2,875.35 Other Fees: Total Fees: $ 4,744.33 Clerk: "_~qlSf __ "_ Date: aJt--o8 I 12 Driveway Pennit GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION I 08 81h Street, Suite 401, Glenwood Springs, Co 8160 I Phone: 970-945-8212 I Fax: 970-384-3470 /Inspection Line: 970-384-5003 \VWV.'. gu rfie I d~countv. cq 1 n oo.co Authority. This application for a Building Pc011it must be signed by the Owner oft he propet1y. desctibed above, or an authorized agent. !f the si~,;natu1·e below is not thM of the Owner. a separate letter of authority, signed by the Owner. must be provided with this Application Legal Access. A Building Penn it cannot be issued without proof of legal and adequate access to the property lOr 1>urposes of inspections by the Building Department Other Permits, Multiple separate permits may be required: (I) State Electrical Penn it. (2) County !SDS Pem1i1. (3) another penni! required for use on the property idcnti lied above, e.g. State or County Highway/ Road Access or a State Wastewater Discharge Petmit Void Permit. A Building Permit becomes null and void if the work authorized is not commenced within 180 days of the date of issuance and if work is suspe11dcd or abandoned for a period of ! SO days after commencement. CERTIFICATION ! hereby certifY that! have read this Application and that the infmmation contained above is true and cotTcct. I understand that the Buildi11g Ocpm11Mnt ncccpts the Application. along with the plans and specifications and other data submitted by me or on my behalf (submittals), based upon my certification as to accuracy. Assumitlg completeness of the submittals and approval of this Application, a Building Penn it will be issued granting pennission tO me. as Owner. to construct the structure(s) and facilities detailed on the submittals reviewed by the Building Department. In consideration of the issuance of the Building Permit, ! agree that ! and my agents will comply with provisions of any federal. state or local law regulating the work and the Garfield County Building Code, IS OS regulations and applicable land usc regulations (County Regulation(s)). I ack110wledge that the Building Pemlit may be suspended or revoked, upon notice fro111 the County, if the location, construction or use of the structure(s) and facility(ies), described above, are not in compliance with County Rcgullllion(s) or any other applicable law. I hereby grant pennission to the Building Department to enter the property, described above, to inspect the work. I iiu1her acknowledge that the issuance of the Building Permit does not prevent the Building Offieial fi·om; (I) requiring the correction of errors in the submiuals, if any, discovered after issuance: or (2) stopping constmction or use of the structure(s) or facility(ies) if such is in violation of County Regulation(s) or any other applicable law. Review of this Application, including submittals, and inspections of the work by the Building Department do not constitute an acceptance of responsibility or liability by the County of errors. omissions or discrepancies. As the Owner, ! acknowledge that responsibility for compliance with federaL state and local laws and County Regulations rest with me and 111y authorized agents, including without · engineer and/ 01· builder. THAT! HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE NOTICE & CERTIFICATION ABOVE· STAFF USE ONLY [8~6~{3""f P::t~ #'£ ~ffl-ltYj!.le,tt Vl'ltt /Je. /l..~~t'b~&.t fer flf, -\Po ~ ~ ~~~ Adjusted Valuation: Plan Check Fcc: Permit Fee: Manu home Fee: Mise Fees: I..\ 3 ~ 5 "58" 7'2-l s lo ?:> "fij-" Z97s"!>' 0/ c( ISDS Fee: Total Fees: Fees Paid: Balance Due: f"' ,f()~'" ISDS No & Issued Date: 1 L\14"\ ~") jb\Q&'&. ({ 0 ,;7. 8" 1 S' 3 Setb~cl\.s: OCC Group: Const Type: Zoning: ' ;::r::f2c. BLDG DEPT: . ~ PLNG DEPT: '2-1-o€-: 1 It\ ~ ')-J-oY' ~\)_~ DATE AP 'RISI\IlAI. ' DATE v v The following items are required by Garfield County for a final Inspection: 1) A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector. 2) Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department and posted at the structure and where readily visible from access road. 3) A finished roof; a lockable building; completed exterior siding; exterior doors and windows installed; a complete kitchen with cabinets, sink with hot & cold running water, non-absorbent kitchen floor covering, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove and refrigerator; all necessary plumbing. 4) All bathrooms must be complete, with washbowl, tub or shower, toilet, hot and cold running water, non-absorbent floors, walls finished, and privacy door. 5) Steps over three (3) risers, outside or inside must be must have handrails. Balconies and decks over 30" high must be constructed to all me and IRC requirements including guardrails. 6) Outside grading completed so that water slopes away from the building; 7) Exceptions to the outside steps, decks, grading may be made upon the demonstration of extenuating circumstances., i.e. Weather. Under such circumstances A Certificate of Occupancy may be issued conditionally. 8) A final inspection sign off by the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department for driveway installation, where applicable; as well as any final sign off by the Fire District, and/or State Agencies where applicable. A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (C.O.) WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. A C.O. MAY TAKE UP TO 5 BUSINESS DAYS TO BE PROCESSED AND ISSUED. OWNER CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A C.O. IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATING PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET. I understand and agree to abide by the above conditions for occupancy, use and the issuance of a C.O. for the building identified in the Building Permit. z.\ ( \ov. OWNERS SIGNATURE DATE Bapplicationdecember2007 VALUATION FEE DETERMINATION Applicant Address Date Cooper Subdivision -::2;;:2~F"'en::.w_,i,...ck:-:Ct,.-.---------Lot!Block Aspen Glen 48 Roaring Fork Mesa _,2"-/7"-/"'20o:.:0:;;8'--'--'-'---'-~-'-------'Contractor Gruenfeldt Finished <Livable Area): Main Upper Lower Other Total Basement: Unfinished Square Feet Valuation Conversion of Unfinished to Finished Total Valuation Garage: Valuation Crawl Space Valuation Decks/ Patios Valuation Covered Open Type of Construction: Occupancy: Valuation Total Valuation 2244 sf 1132 sf 2028 sf sf X $74.68 5404 sf sf X $41.00 sf X $33.68 926 sf X $18.00 sf X $9.00 403,570.72 0.00 16,668.00 0.00 474 sf X $24.00 ~ 11 1 37{,, 327 sf X $12.00 " >'1 ;;2.'-f. .----'!5,3 00.00 Commercial sf X sf X sf X sf X sf X sf X 0.00 435,538.72 GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING 970-945-8212 MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS For SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING CONSTRUCTION Including NEW CONSTRUCTION ADDITIONS ALTERATIONS And MOVED BUILDINGS In order to understand the scope of the work intended under a permit application and expedite the issuance of a permit it is important that complete information be provided. When reviewing a plan and it's discovered that required information has not been provided by the applicant, this will result in the delay of the permit issuance and in proceeding with building construction. The owner or contractor shall be required to provide this information before the plan review can proceed. Other plans that are in line for review may be given attention before the new information may be t·eviewed after it has been provided to the Building Department. TWO (2) SETS OF CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS & TWO (2) SITE PLANS MUST BE SUBMITTEDFOR ALL APPLICATIONS. Please review this document to determine if you have enough information to design your project and provide adequate information to facilitate a plan review. Also, please consider using a design professional for assistance in your design and a construction professional for construction of your project. Any project with more than ten (10) occupants requires the plans to be sealed by a Colorado Registered Design Professional. To provide for a more understandable plan in order to determine compliance with the building, plumbing and mechanical codes, applicants are requested to review the following checklist prior to and during design. Applicants are required to indicate appropriately and to submit the completed checklist at time of application for a permit. Plans to be included for a Building Permit, must be on drafting paper at least 18"x24" and drawn to scale. Plans must include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations all sides with decks, balcony, steps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the finish grade line and original grade. A section showing in detail, from the bottom of the footing to the top of the roof, including re-bar, anchor bolts, pressure treated plates, floor joists, wall studs and spacing, insulation, sheeting, house-rap, (which is required), siding or any approved building material. Engineered foundations may be required. A window schedule. A door schedule. A floor framing plan, a roof framing plan, roof must be designed to withstand a 40 pound per square foot up to 7,000 feet in elevation, a 90 M.P.H. wind speed, wind exposure B or C, and a 36 inch frost depth. All sheets to be identified by number and indexed. All of the above requirements must be met or your plans will be returned. All plans submitted must be incompliance with the 2003 !RC. 1. Is a site plan included that identifies the location of the proposed structure or addition and distances to the property lines from each corner of the proposed structure(s) prepared by a licensed surveyor and has the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing? Properties with slopes of 30% or greater must be shown on the site plan. (NOTE Section: 106.2) Any site plan for the placement of any portion of a structure within 50 ft. of a property line and not within a previously surveyed building envelope on a subdivision final plat shall be prepared by a licensed surveyor and have the surveyor's signature and professional stamp on the drawing. Any structure to be built within a building envelope of a lot shown on a recorded subdivision plat shall include a copy of the building envelope as it is shown on the final plat with the proposed structure located within the ~nvelope. Yes / 2. Does the site plan also include any other buildings on the property, setback easements and utility easements? Please refer to Section 5.05.03 in the Garfield County Zoning Resolution if the property you are applying for a building permit on is located on a corner lot. Special setbacks do apply. _,/"/ Yes ____ _ 3. Does the site plan include when applicable the location of the !.S.O.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System) and the distances to the property lines, wells (on subject property and adjacent properties), streams or water courses? Yes - 4. Does the site plan indicate the location and direction of the County or private road accessing the pro petty/ Yes · 2 5. Are you aware that prior to submittal of a building permit application you are required to show proof of a legal and adequate access to the site? This may include (but is not limited to) proof of your right to use a private easement/right of way; A County Road and Bridge permit; a Colorado Dept. of Highway Permit, including a Notice to Proceed; a permit from the federal government or any combination. You can contact the Road & Bridge Department at 625-8601. See phone book for other age~ Yes ----- 6. Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all reinforcing steel in accordanc~with the IRC or per stamped engineered design? Yes ./ 7. Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under fioor crawl spaces and the clearances reguifed between wood and earth? Yes / No ____ _ 8. Do the plans indicate. the size and location of ventilation openings for the attic, roof joist spaces and soffits? / Yes No ____ _ 9. Do the plans include design loads as required by Garfield County for roof snow loads, (a minimum of 40 pounds B>'r square foot up to & including 7,000 feet above sea level), fioor loads and wind loads? / Yes _______ _ I 0. Does the pl.an it;s)ude construct!~ a building section drawing indicating foundation, wall, fioor, and roof Yes. __________ _ II. Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of fioor joists, wall studs, ceiling joists, roof rafter~olsts or trusses? Yes ________ _ 12. Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method of positive connection of all columns a~eams? Yes _______ _ 13. Does the elevation plan indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the undisturbed grade to the midpoint between the ridge and eave of a gable or shed roof or the top of a fiat roof? (Building height measurement usually not to exceed 25 feet) / Yes ______ _ 14. Does the plan include any stove or zero clearance fireplace planned for installation including make and model ~olorado Phase II certifications or phase II EPA certification? Yes No ______ _ 3 15. Does the plan include a masonry fireplace including a fireplace section indicating design to comply with the IRC? / Yes. ______ No _______ _ 16. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that egress/rescue windows from sleeping rOO!JlS and/or basements comply with the requirements of the IRC? Yes. __ /:__ ___ _ 17. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that windows provide natural light and ventilati~or all habitable rooms? Yes _____ _ 18. Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass doors, glazing immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as a walking surface; sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub enclosures and specify safety glazing for these areas? Yes / No _______ _ 19. Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces, boilers and water heaters indicated on the plan?// Yes _____ _ 20. Do you understand that if you are building on a parcel of land created by the exemption process or the subdivi~n'process, are building plans in compliance with all plat notes and/or covenants? Yes ____ _ 21. Do you understand that if you belong to a Homeowners Association (HOA), it is your responsibility to obtain written permission from the association, if required by that association, prior to submitting an application for a building permit? The building permit application will be accepted without it, but you run the risk of the HOA bringing action to enforce the covenants, which can result in revocation of permit issued. Additionally, your Plan Review fee is not refundable if the plans have been reviewed by the Building Department prior to any action by the HOA that requires either revocati~r substantial modification of the plans. Yes _____ _ 22. Will this be the o.nly residential structure on the parcel? Yes / No lfno-Explain: 23. Have two (2) ~plete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the application? Yes ____ _ 24. Do you unde~d that the minimum dimension a home can be on a lot is 20ft. wide and 20ft. long? Yes ____ _ 4 25. Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other construction code requirements?/~ Yes. __ __,/'--- 26. Do your plans comply with all zoning rules and regulations in the County related to your properties zone distric_;Y' Yes __________ _ 27. Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a final inspection by the Garfi~Ounty Building Department? Yes ·------- 28. Do you understand that approval for design and/or construction changes are required prior to the application 9fthese changes? Yes / 29. Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a "Plan Review" fee from you at the time of application submittal and that you will be required to pay the "Permit Fee" as well as any "Road ~~~·or "Septic System" fees required, at the time you pick up your building permit? Yes _____ _ 30. Are you aware that you must call iu for an inspection by 3:30 the business day before the requested inspection in order to receive it the following business day? Inspections will be made f~~7:30 a.m. to 3:30p.m. Monday through Friday. Inspections are to be called in to 384-t'v3. Yes No ______ __ 31. Are you aware that requesting inspections on work that is not ready or not accessible will result in a $50.00 re-i~ection fee? Yes _____ _ 32. Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the IRC including approval on a final inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy and occupancy of the buildingy' Yes _____ _ 33. Are you aware that the Permit Application must be signed by the Owner or a written authority being given for anjAgent and that the party responsible for the project must comply with the IRC? Yes __ c_/ ___ _ 5 34. Do you understand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed Electrician and Plumber to perform installations and hookups, unless you as the homeowner are performing the work? The license number of the person performing the work will be required at time of applicable i/ction. Yes __________________ _ 35. Are you aware, that on the front of the Building Permit Application you will need to fill in the Parcel/Schedule umber for the lot you are applying for this permit on prior to submittal of a building per 1t application? Your attention in this is appreciated. Yes 36. Do you know tlwt the local fire district may require you to submit plans for their review of fire safety issues?/ Yes (please check with the building department about this requirement) 37. Do you und~e_:~tJ that if you are planning on doing any excavating or grading to the property prior to issua/ of a building permit that you will be required to obtain a grading permit? Yes __ .:_ ____ _ 38. Are you aware that if you will be connecting to a public water and/or sewer system, that the tap fees have to be paid and the connections inspected by the service provider prior to the issuance of a Certifica~ Occupancy? Yes ________ __ I hereby acknowledge that I have read, understand and answered these questions to the best of my ability. Signature of Owner Date Phone: "6/9.-bSbS (days); 063-c:fl'l9 (evenings) ProjectName: COOPel::-\2.ES\~ Project Address: 2. '2._ FfJJu.llQ:: QJtlel 6 PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST Applicant C..-ocyu&Z. Building vEn;;ineered Foundation ·VDriveway Permit G:-'X~ ~urveyed Site Plan ~:::::/:::r::::~b~cks ~ ~ach Residential Plan Review List 0inirmun Application Questionnaire ~ubdivision Plat Notes UFire Department Review huation Determination/Fees ~Red Line Plans/Stamps/Sticker J4-1L Attach Conditions ~pplication Signed L/Plan Reviewer To Sign Application ~eel/Schedule No. lJ!/tL_ 40# Snowload Letter-Man£. Hms. v -so, I? t2ep<n). GENERAL NOTES: Date. _ _..6"'---17'-=-a-"'-<lr:''------' Planning/Zoning ~roperty Line Setbacks 3Oft Stream Setbacks -- Flood Plain -- __ Building Height ~oning Sign-off ~Road Impact Fees __ HOA!DRC Approval ~ade/Topography 40% ~Ianning Issues -{..LSUbdivision Plat Notes p 1 9709030.')09 -· ·····.··-·~. -· ··;•·..,.-.·~-~··~·.-·.~··~-:: .. -·~----"'"""" ·-·--·--·-·~··· ----..... · ..... Une ~ C,'\HBONDr\l.f: fl llatc: Location: FIRE · EMS ·RESCUE June 27, 2001', Cooper Residence 22. Fe1mick Courr Garfield County, Colorado Contractor: Complete Fire Prot<~ction (!(Fire Sprinkler System ~gh-in System Test 09.13.40am Notes: _____ {k_ __________________________ _ ----·------····--·-................ ··-----·---------·--------------·---- J Ill/ ,<2 / ~~ -Inspector: _[)]d!£ ,U_· ______ .'l:2.:.30.'d _______ _ Carbondale & Rural Fire Protectimt District 300 Meadowood Drive • Carbondale, CO 81623"' 970-963-2491 Fax 970-963-0569 2 i2 N 10836 0. -----~~~---Assessor's Parcel No. 2393-194-01-052 ·---Date ---=2=-/1-=1:.:..:/2=-::0...:..0.::...8 _ BUILDING PERMIT CARD Job Address __ ...:::2:=2-=.f...:::e.:.:nw=ic:::.;k:.:..:C::.:o:..:u:.:..rt2, -=C=a:..:rb:..:o:::.;n:.::d=al:.:::e-l(:..:Ro.:::a::.:r..:.:in.:...g!...:f:.:..:o::.:.r.:.:.k.:.:M::.:e:.::s=a .:..:fl:x9::.:#2::z•...:::L:::o..:..t _:_48=..~.)-.!A...:.~:.:..:/1...t.;IZ::.::~..:...A/.::...:.:..:61:::...-..:...t:;..:...,;Z:_A/ ___ _ Owner _____ ___:C:....:o:..:o:Lp:..::e.:lr,...:.R..:.:o:..!y:.:..:&=-=L:::.:in.:.:d:.::a:____ ___ Address 10677 N. E. Way bridgect, Fl Phone# 305-899-8989 Contractor Gruenefeldt, Dan Address P.O.Box 1910 Basalt Phone # 379-6565 Setbacks: Front Rear _____ RH, _____ LH _____ Zoning ____ _ s/f w/open & cov patios & att garage INSPECTIONS Soils Test------------Weatherproofing ____________ _ Footing 3-L!L:t:>.Ji."'~ Foundation /.fd:Oi>P!E. ff~ Y,//..0~~ Mechanicai _____ --==--=------- Eiectrical Rough (State) 7·~ Y-off Grout ________ ~~~~---- Underground Plumbing -'/-Q'S Rough Plumbing -:::> -o Framing -:;:? - Insulation 7,51-o8"~ Roofing { Drywall 7.-t~-tm~C!/~ £b_z.;;ou ~ Final, __________ _ Gas Piping 7::3 --&&£w iflti'P~~~:fef?'h. Other--------------- tJ~'Ie: ":j-~~~::~ESrt~IZ INS'~;£CTiod ~b_ ~ 0 $su<._~. ,~~--'(J (b-'27-0!i · ~ l~ -----/# r/c£ Electrical Final (State) c ~inaltottf-o<;t' /Checklist Com...e.leted?__::l7:.._ __ Certificate Occupancy~t?b f/.p Date I~-tD~22.·0S Septic System # ~ALP-L-1-L-'--------- Date ------------- (continue on back) COUNTY OF GARFIELD -BUILDING DEPARTMENT CORRECTION NOTICE 108 8th St., Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado Phone (970) 945-8212 Job located at ·u ~~ Permit No. I 083 6 I have this day inspected this structure and these premises and found the following corrections needed: )icall for Re-lnspection 0 $50.00 Re-lnspection Fee must be paid prior to Re-lnspection You are hereby notified that the above correction must be inspected before covering. When correction(s) have been made, call for inspection at 970-384-5003. Date .C/-9-<!7,? 20 =---==-- Building Inspector _:::;2.~~~~r;J;//,~z:£~. g;z"""~"*"~@::-:tz=-=------ Phone (970) 945-8212 COUNTY OF GARFIELD -BUILDING DEPARTMENT CORRECTION NOTICE 108 8th St., Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado Phone (970) 945-8212 Job located at 2 L. E/;jJ W/ c I( C/, Permit No. /t:?.f'3 & I have this day inspected this structure and these premises and found the following corrections needed: ?can for Re-lnspection 0 $50.00 Re-lnspection Fee must be paid prior to Re-lnspection You are hereby notified that the above correction must be inspected before covering. When correction(s) have been made, call for inspection at 970-384-5003. Date -'2-/ Building Inspector _ _J~~~~~£0~~C.::::::::::~- Phone (970) 945-8212 INSPECTION Will NOT BE MADE UNLESS THIS CARD IS POSTED ON THE JOB 24 HOURS NOTICE REQUIRED FOR INSPECTIONS BUILDING PERMIT GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO()~ b Date lssued.~:I.J:O~ ••• Zoned Area ..•..•••....••••.••.••...•.•... Permit No .. .l .......... :3. .......... .. AGREEMENT In consideration of the issuance of this permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with all laws and regulations related to the zoning, location; construction and erection of the proposed structure for which this permit is granted, and further agrees that if the above said regulations are not fully complied with in the zoning, location, erection and construction of the above described structure, the permit may then be revoked by notice from the County Building Inspector and IMMEDIATELY BECOME NULL AND VOID. Use &}J.. WI ~H~V pu\\QJ \-Dt~D[Oft\ '¥'111C\e_ Address or Legal Description da }'EDW\C'i. C~\)l'i, ffit'JJ{!)l\~Q'e Owner (~~tt 1 Rt>~{ L\ntlQ, co:tractorti\?!)(>fi'&}cL\l\'1 'W:J? -O~'{) Setbacks Front Side Side Rear This Card Must Be Posted So It is Plainly Visible From The Street Until Final Inspection. ALL LISTED ITEMS MUST BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE COVERING - WHETHER INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR, UNDERGROUND OR ABOVE GROUND. ~dNj~~~~~~~T~HI~S~P~E~RM~I~T~IS~N~O:T~T:RA~N~S:FE:RA~B~L~E~----------~ For Inspections Call384-5003 108 8th Street Glenwood Springs, Colorado APPROVED DO NOT DESTROY THIS CARD Oat~-\~ By}.!o~\11\t\V\J * IF PLACED OUTSIDE-COVER WITH CLEAR PLASTIC HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL SUBSOIL STUDY Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. 5020 County Road !54 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Phone' 970-945-7988 Faxo 970-945-8454 email: hpgeo@hpgeotcch.c()m FOR FOUNDATION DESIGN PROPOSED RESIDENCE LOT M-48, ROARING FORK MESA AT ASPEN GLEN 22 FENWICK COURT GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO JOB NO. 107 0688 SEPTEMBER 28, 2007 PREPARED FOR: GRUENFELDT CONSTRUCTION ATTN: DAN GRUENFELDT P.O. BOX 1910 BASALT, COLORADO 81621 Parker 303-841-7119 * Colorado Springs 719-633-5562 • Silverthorne 970-468-1989 TABLE OF CONTENTS PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY ........................................................................ - 1 - PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ................................................................................. - 1 - SITE CONDITIONS ................................................................................................... - 2 - SUBSIDENCE POTENTIAL ..................................................................................... -2- FIELD EXPLORATION ............................................................................................ -3- SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS .................................................................................. -3- FOUNDATION BEARING CONDITIONS ............................................................... -4- DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................. - 4 - FOUNDATIONS .................................................................................................... -4- FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS ......................................................... - 5 - FLOOR SLABS ...................................................................................................... -7- UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM ...................................................................................... - 7 - SITE GRADING .................................................................................................... - 8 - SURFACE DRAINAGE ......................................................................................... -8- LIMITATIONS .......................................................................................................... -9- REFERENCES ......................................................................................................... -10 - FIGURE I-LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIGURE 2-LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIGURE 3 -LEGEND AND NOTES FIGURE 4-SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS FIGURE 5-GRADATION TEST RESULTS PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY This report presents the results of a subsoil study for a proposed residence to be located at Lot M-48, Roaring Fork Mesa at Aspen Glen, 22 Fenwick Court, Garfield County, Colorado. The project site is shown on Figure I. The purpose of the study was to develop recommendations for the foundation design. The study was conducted in accordance with our agreement for geotechnical engineering services to Gruenfeldt Construction dated September 10, 2007. Chen-Northern, Inc. previously conducted a preliminary geotechnical engineering study for the development (Chen-Northern, 1991) and another geotechnical engineering study for preliminary plat design (Chen-Northern, 1993). A field exploration program consisting of exploratory borings was conducted to obtain information on the subsurface conditions. Samples ofthe subsoils obtained during the field exploration were tested in the laboratory to determine their classification, compressibility or swell and other engineering characteristics. The results of the field exploration and laboratory testing were analyzed to develop recommendations for foundation types, depths and allowable pressures for the proposed building foundation. This report summarizes the data obtained during this study and presents our conclusions, design recommendations and other geotechnical engineering considerations based on the proposed construction and the subsurface conditions encountered. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION The proposed residence will be two story wood frame construction over a walkout basement level. The attached garage and basement floors will be slab-on-grade. Grading for the structure is assumed to be relatively minor with cut depths between about 3 to 1 0 feet. We assume relatively light foundation loadings, typical of the proposed type of construction. Job No. I 07 0688 -2- If building loadings, location or grading plans change significantly from those described above, we should be notified to re-evaluate the recommendations contained in this report. SITE CONDITIONS The property was vacant at the time of our field exploration. There could be some fill on the lot from overlot grading as part of the subdivision development. The ground surface on the western portion of the lot is relatively flat with a gentle slope down to the east. The eastern portion of the lot in the proposed building area slopes moderately steep down to the east towards the Roaring Fork River at a grade of about 20%. The Roaring Fork River is roughly 20 feet below the elevation of the building area. Vegetation consists of grass and weeds. Scattered cobbles were observed on the ground surface. SUBSIDENCE POTENTIAL Bedrock of the Pennsylvanian age Eagle Valley Evaporite underlies the Aspen Glen development. These rocks are a sequence of gypsiferous shale, fine-grained sandstone/siltstone and limestone with some massive beds of gypsum. There is a possibility that massive gypsum deposits associated with the Eagle Valley Evaporite underlie portions of the lot. Dissolution of the gypsum under certain conditions can cause sinkholes to develop and can produce areas of localized subsidence. During previous studies in the area, several sinkholes were observed scattered throughout the Aspen Glen development (Chen-Northern, Inc., 1991). These sinkholes appear similar to others associated with the Eagle Valley Evaporite in areas of the Roaring Fork River Valley. Sinkholes were not observed in the immediate area of the subject lot. No evidence of cavities was encountered in the subsurface materials; however, the exploratory borings were relatively shallow, for foundation design only. Based on our present knowledge of the subsurface conditions at the site, it cam1ot be said for certain that sinkholes will not develop. The risk of future ground subsidence on Lot M-48 throughout the service life of the proposed residence, in our opinion, is low; however, the owner should be made aware Job No. I 07 0688 - 3 - of the potential for sinkhole development. If further investigation of possible cavities in the bedrock below the site is desired, we should be contacted. FIELD EXPLORATION The field exploration for the project was conducted on September 20, 2007. Two exploratory borings were drilled at the locations shown on Figure 1 to evaluate the subsurface conditions. The borings were advanced with 4 inch diameter continuous flight augers powered by a truck-mounted CME-45B drill rig. The borings were logged by a representative of Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. Samples of the subsoils were taken with I% inch and 2 inch I. D. spoon samplers. The samplers were driven into the subsoils at various depths with blows from a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches. This test is similar to the standard penetration test described by ASTM Method D-1586. The penetration resistance values are an indication of the relative density or consistency of the subsoils. Depths at which the samples were taken and the penetration resistance values are shown on the Logs of Exploratory Borings, Figure 2. The samples were returned to our laboratory for review by the project engineer and testing. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Graphic logs of the subsurface conditions encountered at the site are shown on Figure 2. The subsurface conditions encountered in the borings were variable. In Boring I, about II, foot of topsoil was encountered overlying relatively dense, silty sandy gravel with cobbles and probable boulders. At Boring 2, below the topsoil, about 6 feet of stiff, sandy silty clay was encountered overlying the relatively dense gravels. Drilling in the dense granular soils with auger equipment was difficult due to the cobbles and boulders and drilling refusal was encountered in the deposit. Job No. 107 0688 -4- Laboratory testing performed on samples obtained from the borings included natural moisture content, density and gradation analyses. Results of swell-consolidation testing performed on a relatively undisturbed drive sample of the clay soils, presented on Figure 4, indicate low compressibility under existing moisture conditions and light loading and a low collapse potential (settlement under constant load) when wetted. The sample showed moderate compressibility upon increased loading after wetting. Results of gradation analyses performed on small diameter drive samples (minus I Y, inch fraction) of the granular subsoils are shown on Figure 5. No free water was encountered in the borings at the time of drilling or when checked 6 days later and the subsoils were slightly moist. FOUNDATION BEARING CONDITIONS The natural soils below the topsoil are adequate for support of spread footing foundations with a risk of differential settlement. Sandy silty clay was encountered near expected excavation depth in the lower, walkout basement portion of the residence. There is some risk of differential settlement for footings which transition the sandy silty clay soils in the lower part of the lot and the silty sandy gravel soils in the upper part of the Jot. The settlement potential appears low and is not expected to change the footing design but should be further evaluated at the time of construction. Bearing entirely on the gravel soils would reduce the differential settlement potential. DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS FOUNDATIONS Considering the subsurface conditions encountered in the exploratory borings and the nature of the proposed construction, we recommend the building be founded with spread footings bearing on the natural soils. The design and construction criteria presented below should be observed for a spread footing foundation system. Job No. I 07 0688 - 5 - 1) Footings placed on the undisturbed natural soils should be designed for an allowable bearing pressure of I ,500 ps£ Footings bearing entirely on the gravel soils can be designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of 3,000 ps£ Based on experience, we expect settlement of footings designed and constructed as discussed in this section will be about I inch or less. There could be on the order of \6 inch of additional differential settlement of footings that bear on the clay soils if they become wetted. 2) The footings should have a minimum width of 18 inches for continuous walls and 2 feet for isolated pads. 3) Exterior footings and footings beneath unheated areas should be provided with adequate soil cover above their bearing elevation for frost protection. Placement of foundations at least 36 inches below exterior grade is typically used in this area. 4) Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span local anomalies such as by assuming an unsupported length of at least 12 feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining structures should also be designed to resist lateral earth pressures as discussed in the "Foundation and Retaining Walls" section of this report. 5) The topsoil and loose or disturbed soils should be removed and the footing bearing level extended down to the natural soils. The exposed soils in footing area should then be moistened and compacted. The clay bearing soils should be further evaluated for settlement/heave potential at the time of construction. 6) A representative of the geotechnical engineer should observe all footing excavations prior to concrete placement to evaluate bearing conditions. FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS Foundation walls and retaining structures which are laterally supported and can be expected to undergo only a slight amount of deflection should be designed for a lateral earth pressure computed on the basis of an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 55 pcf for backfill consisting of the on-site soils. Cantilevered retaining structures which are Job No. 107 0688 ~tech -6- separate from the residence and can be expected to deflect sufficiently to mobilize the full active earth pressure condition should be designed for a lateral earth pressure computed on the basis of an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 45 pcfforbackfill consisting of the on-site soils. Backfill should not contain vegetation, topsoil or oversized rock. All foundation and retaining structures should be designed for appropriate hydrostatic and surcharge pressures such as adjacent footings, traffic, construction materials and equipment. The pressures recommended above assume drained conditions behind the walls and a horizontal backfill surface. The buildup of water behind a wall or an upward sloping backfill surface will increase the lateral pressure imposed on a foundation wall or retaining structure. An underdrain should be provided to prevent hydrostatic pressure buildup behind walls. Backfill should be placed in uniform lifts and compacted to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content slightly above optimum. Backfill in pavement and walkway areas should be compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density. Care should be taken not to overcompact the backfill or use large equipment near the wall, since this could cause excessive lateral pressure on the wall. Some settlement of deep foundation wall backfill should be expected, even if the material is placed correctly, and could result in distress to facilities constructed on the backfill. The lateral resistance offoundation or retaining wall footings will be a combination of the sliding resistance of the footing on the foundation materials and passive earth pressure against the side of the footing. Resistance to sliding at the bottoms of the footings can be calculated based on a coefficient of friction of0.35 for the clay soils and 0.5 for the gravel soils. Passive pressure of compacted backfill against the sides of the footings can be calculated using an equivalent fluid unit weight of 350 pcf. The coefficient of friction and passive pressure values recommended above assume ultimate soil strength. Suitable factors of safety should be included in the design to limit the strain which will occur at the ultimate strength, particularly in the case of passive resistance. Fill placed against the Job No. 107 0688 ~tech -7- sides of the footings to resist lateral loads should be compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. FLOOR SLABS The natural on-site soils, exclusive of topsoil, are suitable to support lightly loaded slab- on-grade construction. The upper clay soils could have some settlement potential if they are wetted which could result in some slab settlement and distress. To reduce the effects of some differential movement, floor slabs should be separated from all bearing walls and columns with expansion joints which allow unrestrained vertical movement. Floor slab control joints should be used to reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking. The requirements for joint spacing and slab reinforcement should be established by the designer based on experience and the intended slab use. A minimum 4 inch layer of free- draining gravel should be placed beneath basement level slabs to facilitate drainage. This material should consist of minus 2 inch aggregate with at least 50% retained on the No. 4 sieve and less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve. All fill materials for support of floor slabs should be compacted to at least 95% of maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Required fill can consist of the on-site gravel or imported granular soils devoid of vegetation, topsoil and oversized rock. UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM Although free water was not encountered during our exploration, it has been our experience in the area that local perched groundwater can develop during times of heavy precipitation or seasonal runoff. Frozen ground during spring runoff can create a perched condition. We recommend below-grade construction, such as retaining walls and basement areas, be protected from wetting and hydrostatic pressure buildup by an underdrain system. Job No. 107 0688 -8- The drains should consist of drainpipe placed in the bottom of the wall backfill surrounded above the invert level with free-draining graoular material. The drain should be placed at each level of excavation aod at least I foot below lowest adjacent finish grade aod sloped at a minimum 1% to a suitable gravity outlet. Free-draining granular material used in the underdrain system should contain less thao 2% passing the No. 200 sieve, Jess thao 50% passing the No.4 sieve and have a maximum size of2 inches. The drain gravel backfill should be at least 1 Yz feet deep. SITE GRADING The risk of construction-induced slope instability at the site appears low provided cut and fill depths are limited. We assume the cut depths for the basement level will not exceed one level, about 10 feet. Fills should be limited to about 8 to 10 feet deep. Embankment fills should be compacted to at least 95% of the maximum staodard Proctor density near optimum moisture content. Prior to fill placement, the subgrade should be carefully prepared by removing all vegetation aod topsoil and compacting to at least 95% of the maximum staodard Proctor density. The fill should be benched into slopes that exceed 20% grade. Permanent unretained cut aod fill slopes should be graded at 2 horizontal to 1 vertical or flatter aod protected against erosion by revegetation or other meaos. SURF ACE DRAINAGE The following drainage precautions should be observed during construction aod maintained at all times after the residence has been completed: 1) Inundation of the foundation excavations aod underslab areas should be avoided during construction. 2) Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture aod compacted to at least 95% of the maximum staodard Proctor density in pavement aod slab areas and to at least 90% of the maximum staodard Proctor density in landscape areas. Job No. l 07 0688 -9- 3) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions. We recommend a minimum slope of 12 inches in the first 10 feet in unpaved areas and a minimum slope of 3 inches in the first I 0 feet in paved areas. Free-draining wall backfill should be capped with about 2 feet of the on- site finer graded soils to reduce surface water infiltration. 4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill. Surface water should not be concentrated and directed onto the steep down slope without adequate erosion protection. LIMITATIONS This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no warranty either express or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the exploratory borings drilled at the locations indicated on Figure I, the proposed type of construction and our experience in the area. Our services do not include determining the presence, prevention or possibility of mold or other biological contaminants (MOBC) developing in the future. If the client is concerned about MOBC, then a professional in this special field of practice should be consulted. Our fmdings include interpolation and extrapolation of the subsurface conditions identified at the exploratory borings and variations in the subsurface conditions may not become evident until excavation is performed. If conditions encountered during construction appear different from those described in this report, we should be notified so that re-evaluation ofthe recommendations may be made. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes. We are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. As the project evolves, we should provide continued consultation and field services during construction to review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations, and to verify that the recommendations have been appropriately interpreted. Significant design Job No. I 07 0688 - I 0- changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommendations presented herein. We recommend on-site observation of excavations and foundation bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a representative of the geotechnical engmeer. Respectfully Submitted, HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. ~17oJ~Q J rdy Z. Adamson, Jr., P.E. Reviewed by: JZNcay cc: Maggert & Associates -Attn: AI Rakowski REFERENCES Chen-Northern, Inc., 1991, Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Study, Proposed Aspen Glen Development, Garfield County, Colorado, prepared for Aspen Glen Company, dated December 20, 1991, Job No.4 112 92. Chen-Northern, Inc., 1993, Geotechnical Engineering Study for Preliminary Plat Design, Aspen Glen Development, Garfield County, Colorado, prepared for Aspen Glen Company, dated May 28, 1993, Job No. 4 112 92. Job No. 107 0688 6050 107 0688 6040 LOT M-8 6030 PROPOSED RESIDENCE 6020 I LOT M-48 ROARING FORK MESA) I ~EN~~N ( -----------------~ ---------------~00~3~0--~~60;20 6040 6050 c~c&tech HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL LOT M-49 APPROXIMATE SCALE 111 = 30* LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS Figure 1 ( 6045 6040 6035 Q5 Q) lL c 6030 0 -~ 6; [jJ 6025 6020 6015 107 0688 BORING 1 ELEV.= 6041' 19/6,23/4 +4=9 ·200=52 12/6,5/3 BORING2 ELEV.= 6034' 24/12 15/12 WC=3.9 DD=101 54/6,27/3 WC=1.9 +4=49 -200=15 Note: Explanation of symbols is shown on Figure 3. c~~ LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS HEPWORTI+PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL 6045 6040 6035 Q5 Q) lL 6030 c 0 1 [jJ 6025 6020 6015 Figure 2 LEGEND: 24/12 T NOTES: TOPSOIL; sandy silty clay, scattered gravel, organics, roots, firm, slightly moist, brown. CLAY (CL); silty, sandy, stiff, slightly moist, brown, low plasticity. GRAVEL (GM); silty, sandy, with cobbles and probable boulders, dense, slightly moist, brown. Relatively undisturbed drive sample; 2-inch I. D. California liner sample. Drive sample; standard penetration test (SPT), 1 3/8 inch I. D. split spoon sample, ASTM D-1586. Drive sample blow count; indicates that 24 blows of a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches were required to drive the California or SPT sampler 12 inches. Depth at which boring had caved when measured on September 26, 2007. Practical rig refusal. 1. Exploratory borings were drilled on September 20, 2007 with 4-inch diameter continuous flight power auger. 2. Locations of exploratory borings were measured approximately by pacing from features shown on the site plan provided. 3. Elevations of exploratory borings were obtained by interpolation of contours shown on the site plan provide and checked by instrument level. 4. The exploratory boring locations and elevations should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. 5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory boring logs represent the approximate boundaries between material types and transitions may be gradual. 6. No free water was encountered in the borings at the time of drilling or when checked 6 days later. Fluctuation in water level may occur with time. 7. Laboratory Testing Results: WC = Water Content (%) DD = Dry Density (pcf) +4 = Percent retained on the No. 4 sieve -200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve 107 0688 c~~ HEPWORTf+oPAWLAK GEO'Jl!CHNICAL LEGEND AND NOTES Figure 3 Moisture Content = 3.9 percent Dry Density = 101 pcf Sample of: Sandy Silty Clay From: Boring 2 at 5 Feet 0 1 _.....----r- Compression upon 'if 2 ........ wetting c ~ 0 '(ii "' 3 '\. ~ 0. '\ E 0 r\ u 4 5 1\ 6 0.1 1.0 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE -ksf 107 0688 c~&tech SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Figure 4 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL I HYDROMETER ANALYSIS SIEVE ANALYSIS I .J TIME READINGS I U.S. STANDARD SERIES I CLEAR SQUARE OPENINGS J 24HI0! 7HR 3/8" 3/4" 11/2" 3" 5"6" 8" 45 IN. 15 MIN. 60MIN19MIN.4 MIN. 1 MIN. #200 #100 #50 #30 #16 #8 #4 0 100 10 90 20 BO 0 CJ w z 30 " z ~ 05 (/) 40 60 if: a: f-f- z 50 90 z w w 0 0 a: 60 " a: w w o_ o_ 70 "' 80 20 90 " 100 0 .001 002 .005 .000 .019 .037 .074 .190 300 .600 1.18 2.36 4.75 9.5 12.5 19.0 37,5 76.2 152 203 '" DIAMETER OF PARTICLES IN MILLIMETERS CLAYTOSU ND GRAVEL COBBLES FINE MEOIUM COARSE FINE COARSE GRAVEL 9 % SAND 39 % SILT AND CLAY 52 % LIQUID LIMIT % PLASTICITY INDEX % SAMPLE OF: Slightly Gravelly Sandy Silt Matrix FROM: Boring 1 at 2 and 5 Feet, Combined HYDROMETER ANALYSIS SIEVE ANALYSIS I TIME READINGS I U.S. STANDARD SERIES I CLEAR SQUARE OPENINGS ~· 24 II<. 1t t\\h 60MIN19MIN.4 MIN. 1 MIN. #200 1 1/2" 3" 5"6" 45 #100 #50 #30 #16 #8 #4 3/8" 3/4" 0 100 10 90 0 20 80 w CJ z 30 70 z ~ 05 (/) 40 60 if: a: f-f-z 50 50 z w w 0 0 a: 60 40 a: w w o_ o_ 70 30 80 20 90 10 100 0 .001 .002 .005 .009 .019 .037 .074 .150 .300 .600 1.18 2.36 4.75 9.~2.519.0 37.5 76.2 d52 203 DIAMETER OF PARTICLES IN MILLIMETERS I I I C068LES GRAVEL 49 % SAND 36 % SILT AND CLAY 15 % LIQUID LIMIT % PLASTICITY INDEX % SAMPLE OF: Silty Sandy Gravel FROM: Boring 2 at 10 Feet 107 0688 c~&tech GRADATION TEST RESULTS Figure 5 HEPWORTH•PAWLAK GEroTECHNICAL. Parcel Detail Page 1 of3 Garfield County Assessor/Treasurer Parcel Detail Information Assessor/Treru;JJrer Prope~Search I Assessor Subs~uety I Assessor Sales Search Clm & Record~er Reception Search llm;ic Building_Characteristics I fuJnformation Parcel Detail I Value Detail I Sales Detl!il I Residep.tial/Comrner_cial Improvement Detail Land Detail I Photog!1!Phs I Tax Area II Account Number II Parcel Number II 2007 Mill Levy I I 082 II R820091 II 239319401052 II 64.976 I Owner Name and Mailing Address !coOPER, ROY & LINDA I !10677 NE QUAYBRlDGE CT I !MIAMI, FL 33138 I Legal Description !SECT,TWN,RNG:19-7-88 SUB:ROARlNG I !FORK MESA FLG #2 LOT:48 PRE:R820028 I IBK:1043 PG:0854 BK:1043 PG:0835 I IBK:0966 PG:0686 BK:0966 PG:0682 I IBK:0925 PG:0346 BK:0921 PG:0661 I IBK:0835 PG:0305 BK:1762 PG:49 !RECPT:690008 BK: 1182 PG:229-231 !RECPT:562024 BK: 1182 PG:227 !RECPT:562023 BK: 1182 PG:225 IRECPT:562022 BK:1139 PG:887 I !RECPT:548687 BK:l072 PG:0149 I Location Physical Address: I!CARBONDALE I Subdivision: I!ROARlNG FORK MESA FLG #21 II http://www .garcoact.com/ assessor/parcel.asp ?ParcelN umber=23 9319401 052 2/112008 Parcel Detail Page 2 of3 I Land Acres: //0.375 I I Land Sq Ft: 110 I Section II TownshiJ! II Range I I 19 II 7 II 88 I 2007 Property Tax Valuation Information II Actual Value II Assessed Value I I Land: II 55o,oooll 159,5001 I Improvements: II Oil 0 I Total: II 55o,oooll 159,5001 Sale Date: lll/3/2006 Sale Price: 11580,000 Basic Building Characteristics Number of Residential 0 Buildings: Number of Commllnd 0 Buildings: No Building Records Found Tax Information I Tax Year II Transaction TyJ!e II Amount I I 2007 II Tax Amount II $10,363.681 I 2006 II Tax Payment: Whole II ($9,747.48)1 I 2006 II Tax Amount II $9,747.481 I 2005 II Tax Payment: Whole II ($9,790.26)1 I 2005 II Tax Amount II $9,790.261 I 2004 II Tax Payment: Second Half II ($5,723.26)1 I 2004 II Tax Payment: First Half II ($5, 723.26)/ 2004 II Tax Amount II $11,446.521 2003 II Tax Payment: Whole II ($9,739.38)1 2003 II Tax Amount II $9,739.381 2002 II Tax Payment: Whole II ($9,878.64)1 2002 II Tax Amount II $9,878.641 2001 II Tax Payment: Whole II ($9,930.78)1 http://www. garcoact.coml assessor/parcel. asp ?ParcelN umber=23 9319401 052 2/1/2008 Parcel Detail I 2001 II Tax Amount II $9,930.781 I 2000 II Tax Payment: Whole II ($8,044.8421 I 2000 II Tax Amount II $8,044.841 I 1999 II Tax Payment: Whole II ($8,137.9821 1 ' I 1999 II Tax Amount II $8,137.981 ----------------------------------~--~-- Thp of Page Assessor .D!ltabase Search__Qptions I Irefisurer Database Search Options Ckrk_& Recorder l2aillbase Search_QpJkms Page 3 of3 The Garfield County Assessor and Treasurer's Offices make every effort to collect and maintain accurate data. However, Good Turns Software and the Garfield County Assessor and Treasurer's Offices are unable to warrant any of the information herein contained. Copyright © 2005 -2008 Good Turns Software. All Rights Reserved. Database & Web Design by Good Turns .Software. http://www.garcoact.com/assessor/parcel.asp?Parce1Nurnber=23931940 1 052 2/112008