HomeMy WebLinkAbout2.0 BOCC Staff Report 09.09.1985a o
Bocc 9/e/85
PROJECT INFORMATION AND STAFF COMMENTS
REQUEST:
APPLICANT:
TOCATTON:
SITE DATA:
WATER:
SEWER:
ACCESS:
EXISTING ZONING:
ADJACENT ZONING:
I RELATIONSHIP TO
For Exemption from the definitionof Suociivision.
Karen L. Groom
A tract of land situated in Lots 11and L2 of Section 35, T7S, R88W;approximately 1 L/2 miLes easr of
Carbondale off of County Rd. 100.
The site consists of a I0 acreparcel
Ex i st ing
Proposed
system.
weIl
individuai ser^/age disposal
The site is locatedindicated on the
Distr ict Ivlap.
Exrsting access road, WiIIow Lane
A/R/RD
A/R/RD in all directions.
THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
within t,he Carbondale Urban Area of Influence asGarfield County Comprehensive plan Management
IT. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL
A. Site Description: The sitepoor drai-Ege Tn low lying Ieve1 with some evidence of
One single farnily residence isarea horse pasture and lawns.
an exemption reguest inacre parcel and a separate
15 very
areas.located on-srte with the remaining
B.Pro ect Descri tion The applicant proposes to divide the I0tracts of approximately 2 L/2, 2 L/2 and 5reeacre parce ntoacres each.
C. History:
November,
2.27 acre
Garfierd County approved
1975 creating t,he currenr, 10Ioc.
TII.MAJOR ISSUES AND CONCERNS
The aPPlicant I s well permit was approved oy the State Division ofwater Resources rn Lg77 for domestic use and, therefore, canserve up to three dwelling units as proposed. Each parcel shoul5receive a deeded interest in the exiscrng well with easements foraccess and maintenance of the well and waterlines shown on theexemption plat.
1
2.Based on soils information submitted by the applrcant, the sitei9 partially located in an area of high water taofes and severelimitations on septic systems. As a result, piat notes should beincruded on the exemption plat inoicatrn! that engineeredfoundations and septic systems may be reguired.
comments have been received from an adjacent property ownerobjecting to the proposed sprits based on tire increase inpopulation density. (See lettei, page .f ).
-t-
3.
O
rhe proposed site is locateo within an area referred to as JackSharp Tracts. This areas has been spiit into numerous parcelsand is currently comprised of approximatery 27 differentownership interest,s averaging 3.I acres in size r €rs indicated inthe Assessors Office records. The actual number and size ofindividual Iots is not absolutely clear oased on availableinformation.
Garfield county has approveo L4 exemptions and denied 2exemptions within approximately a one mire radius of tne site.
The proposed splits would be the last allowable by exemption onthis site, based on tne Subdivision Regulations. A plat noteshould be added stating this fact.
o
4.
IV.SUGGESTED IIINDINGS
1.That proper posting andfor tire meeting before the
2
V. RECOMMENDATTON
APPROVAL, with the following conditions:
1. That the following plat notes
5
6
3
That the meeting oefore the Board of County Commissioners wasextensive and complete, that arr perrrnent facts, matters andissues were submitted and that all interested parties were heardat that meeting.
That for the above stated and other reasons, the proposeoexemption is in the best interest of the healtn, safety, moials,convenience, order, prosperity and welfare of the citizens ofGarfield Councy.
pubiic notice was provideo as required
Board of County Commiss].oners.
oe included on tne exemption plat.
exemption from definition will bea) No
allowed.
further divisions by
b) Engineereo foundations and septic systems may be reguired.
2.
4
5.
That each parcel recej-ve a deeded interest
and that easements for aII waterlines,
maintenance of the well be included on tneany legal descriptions
in tne existing welland for access and
exemption piat and in
3 That all shares of irrigation water associated wltn thebe divided proportionately amongst tne three lots.
That $400.00 in School Impact fees for the creation oflots be paid prror to final approval.
property
two new
A11 representations of the applicant, €ither with the applicationor stated at the hearing oefore the Board of countycommissioners, shalr be considered conditions of approvar.
.10'll',1 t.lnu*
4
at {
^'i"'{t,i,t, e nsc*,'l<
{,rrd ip I f,r*t r }F
k rf f,r5ui;r1 o.ri or*
fh vrv pl li",r rJPti: r' ,
b.
&{tsir -k
U
,4"r"r^r.{M.
orO-ft::
*.
S,
Fi
#
'l;,,*
s:
h.
"x'sIt..rtlt
$
ll
*l
U.,
01f2 Will-ol Lane
Carbondale, CO 8762)
August 22, L985
T:., i*. ,,-' ,':':\, / i t [J
Board of County Commissioners
Garfield County
Glenwood Springe, g0 81501
Gentlenen:
In regard to the subdlvieion of the Karen Groom
property Lote 1l & 12 of Section J5, Township 7 South,
Range 88W of the 6th P.M.
We gXg AgL 5.n favor or any more subd,ividing in tbisarea. By dividing the land we would have two houses,/
faniHee directly across fron our property. If we had
wanted to live in a populated area rve would have chosen
to live ln town. If thie divlsion is allowed there are
other property owners in this area that couLd do the
sa.me thlng thue populating thls area to an excess.
Yours truIy,
fr,ar.irr- , ,. t r,. ,4*'-(- ,,i ,-<-.
nrtn ...1HUU *.)
t: .. - ..i ,l
C0UNTY Cu!11/ilSSl0N ERS
'.luu? | fg€r:
9S5
Barbara & Don l)enne
01,2 Wi 11or l,ane
i/\".,1t
tl
,I
11 ll
'll''.-,: c,. .i,rnxI"
-{-
-,
e
.1
,J
I
{ .l'
T.8S
N
--NOTE- ;.
E TO SCALE AT]ONS OF
OF SMALL
LED.:ALL AB
EDIUM SHADTNQ ARE Z ONE B. ALL AREAS
NG ARE ZONE C UNLESS OTHE RWISE
11.
o
a
x
a o
September
Board of CountY Commissioners
Garfield CountY
109 Bth Street
Glenwood SPrings, CO. 81601
Re: Public Hearing on Karen L. Groom subdivision Exemption
Dear Commissioners:
Box 3633
Aspen, CO.8T6I2
8, 1985
for the SePtember 9 Public
subdivision exemPtion. I
Wi1low Lane which abuts the
I am submitting this written comment
hearing on Karen Groom's request fol
am the owner of the Property at 0167
Groom proPertY on the north.
My concern is in regard to preservation of irrigation rights and
the reasonabl-e use of the same. I am requesting that as a condition
of approvaL of the exemption that all iriigation easements be shown
on a recorded plat to alert potential buyeis to th9 existence of
such easements. There is a fO foot easement for the main branch
of the Union Ditch and a fifteen foot easement for a lateral along
the easterly and northerly portion of the property. The lateral
ditch is the historical and -on1y gravity means of conveying water
to the majorily of my 2,27 acrei [o the north. A11 too frequently
as development occur! there is inadequate attention paid to the
practical "o.,i"qu"nces of irrigation and inadequate provision
made for protecting these rights. As a result smaller ditches
are obliterated by new strucfures leavi-ng no practical carriage
route ror structur"es are built too close [o the ditch creating high
groundwater problems for the structure. If new buildings are
constucted so close to the ditch as to have a groundwater problem'
then the new development should bear the responsibility for any
corrective action. The above easements are reserved in Book 488'
Page 14.
1f these concerns are made conditions of approval and
configuration remains as currently proposed, I have no
to the granting of the exemption reguest '
Yours trulY,
Paul oavid El1is
the Iot
ob lect ions
cc Glen Hartman
a - Nn*+z Ioa
Board of County Conmlssloners
Garf,leld County
Glenuood $prings' C0 81501
Gentlemen:
In re6ard to tho eubdlvlslon of the Karen Groou
property Lote 11 & 12 of Sectlon ]), Tornehlp 7 Sotrth,
Range 88W of the 5th P.M.
XIe EEg lg.t 1n favor or any nore eubdlvldlng J.n this
afoa. By dtvlding the tand we would have two houees,/
fauillee dlractly &cross f,ron our property. If re had
wanted to live ln a populated area Yo sould have chosen
to Ilve tn torn. If thls divieion le allowsd there are
otber property ownors Ln thlc area that could do the
cane thing thue populatlng thls area to an excetse.
Youre tru1yl,
01f2 Willow Lane
Carbondale, CO 8].523
August 22, L985
d**^* E,,..
Barbara & Don Deane
01]2 l{illor Lane
RECHIVED
AUG 2 3 1985
Giiil IiILD
OOUNTY COMMISSIOilERS
AUGE E I9B5
lli
I
I
iJAAflEtD CO. PI.AN}IER
a o
CARBONDALE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
3OO Meadowood Drive
Carbondale, Colorado 81623
(303) e63-2491
August 16, 1985
Mr. I{ark Bean
Garfiel-d County Planning DePt.
109 Bth st.
Glenwood Spgs. CO 8l-601
Dear Mark,
I have verbatly reviewed, with Mil<e Dennis, the proposed sub-
division located at 0045 Vf,illow Lane, Carbondale Colorado,
and owned by Karen Groom. I would like to offer the following
comments to you regarding fire protection for this property.
Access to the existing property and structures is adequete for
fire trucks and ambulances.
Response tj-me to the property is approximately
Fire trucks and ambulance service will respond
Fire Station.
12-15 minutes.
from the Carbondale
Water for fire protection for single family houses on the project
will be provided by tanker trucks. The tanker trucks will ref.iIl
in Carbondale or at an available 1oca1 ditch.
If you have any questions feel free to contact me at 963-2491.
Sincerely,
&^
Ron Leach
Carbondale & Ruraf f ire Protection District
Chief
0
AuGe 1 ruB$ I
Gr1 ',, -'i 'l ',) i)l ,i i\r lr r i/
o o
GARFIELD COUNTY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
August 14, l9B5
Mike Dennis
0304 Highway 133
Carbondale, CIO 8L623
Dear Mike:
your application for exemption, submitted on behalf of Karen Groom, has
been reviewed by this departrnent and has been found to pe complete pending
a Ietter addressing fire protection.
Your request has been scheduled for a public meeting before the Board of
County Conrnissioners on September 9, 1985, at 1l:00 A.M., in the
bnrnissionersr Meeting Room, Suite 30I, C;arfield @unty Courthouse, I09
8th St., Glenwood Springs, Cf) 8160I. It is suggested that you be
represented at the time of the meeting.
Copies of the enclosed public notice form need to be mailed by certified
return receipt to all property owners adjacent to or within 200 ft. of
your property no less than 15 days prior to the meeting. In addition, the
notice needs to be mailed by certified return receipt to o!.ners of mineral
rights, or lessees of mineral owners of record of the land proposeci for
exemption, no less than 15 days prior to the meeting. Ihe receipts frorn
these mailings need to be presented at the tiJre of the meeting or
sutxnitted to the Planning Department prior to the meeting. The exemption
site must be posted with the enclosed notice trrcster no later than 15 days
prior to the meeting. These public notice reguirements should be
conpleted no later than August 23rd to ensure compliarce.
If you have further questions or concerns regarding the meeting or public
notice requirements, please contacL this office.
Sincerely,,0L*4tfu
Glenn HarEnann
GIlemh
encl.
1 09 BTH STREET. THIRD FLOOR 945-821 2 / 625-5571 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81601