Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1.0 Application
FedEx Ground - Eastbank Site Garfield County Application for Major Impact Review Submitted by: Western Slope Consulting LLC 0165 Basalt Mountain Drive Carbondale, Colorado 81623 970-963-7172 wsconsulting@sopris.net Updated 4/23/15 Page - 2 Table of Contents Page Application Submittal Letter 3 Applicant & Consultant Information 4 Application Form 5 Agreement to Pay Form 7 Property Ownership, Surface Use Leases and Mineral Ownership Information 8 Certificate of Taxes Due 41 Property Legal Description 42 Statement of Ownership and Authorization 44 Statements of Authority 46 Letter of Authorization 51 Names and Addresses of All Property Owners within 200 Ft. 52 Map of Subject Parcel and Adjacent Property Owners 54 Project Narrative 55 Relationship to Garfield County Zone District Regulations 56 Significant Natural and Man-made Features on the Site 51 Building Elevations 58 Landscape Plan 60 Professionally Engineered Drawings and Reports 61 Water Supply Information 67 Vicinity Map 103 Pre-Application Conference Summaries 104 Site Plan 108 Relationship to Glenwood Springs Comprehensive Plan 109 Existing County Zoning 112 General Conformity with Garfield County Comprehensive Plan 113 Impact Analysis 117 Adjacent Land Use 118 SWMP / Disturbance / OWTS 131 Radiation Hazard 143 Estimated Construction Costs 145 Development Agreement / Improvement Agreement 146 Page - 3 Application Submittal Letter June 9, 2015 Mr. David Pesnichak Garfield County Community Development Department Planning Manager 108 8th St # 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Dear Mr. Pesnichak: I am pleased to submit herewith a revised application (including information up to June 9, 2015) for Major Impact Review to construct a FedEx shipping facility on property adjacent to County Road 154 identified as parcel number 2185-353-04-001. This submittal includes the additional information requested by the staff and that was delivered to the County in the supplement dated 4/15/15. The technical classification for the FedEx Ground use in the Rural (R) zone district is “Warehouse and Distribution Center”. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. (FedEx Ground) is a premiere provider of small package delivery services and searched Glenwood Springs as well as surrounding areas for strategically viable sites. The company has elected to locate their new sorting and distribution facility serving Garfield County, and the surrounding area. The project will bring 14.5 jobs to the area as well as bringing strategically located and much needed services to Garfield County and the Glenwood Springs community. FedEx Ground hopes to initiate construction as soon as possible during the 2015 building season. The proposed facility is an approximately 27,000 square foot building with the majority of business activities occurring inside the building where delivery vehicles are manually loaded and unloaded from a proprietary material handling system. The site is located in a location adjacent to other light industrial uses and will have convenient access to Highway 82 at an existing signalized intersection. This application conforms to the requirements of the pertinent sections of the Garfield County Land Use and Development Code. The FedEx facility will meet the growing shipping needs of the area and is designed to fit the Garfield County land-use goals and also the Glenwood Springs Comprehensive Plan as the site is within the Glenwood Urban Growth Area. The development is laid out to conform to the characteristics of the site in a manner that fits the site’s natural features, offers safe access and is compatible with surrounding uses. Our team looks forward to reviewing this material with the County at the earliest convenience. We understand that the public hearing on this application is scheduled with the Planning Commission on June 10, 2015 at 6:30 PM. Public notice for the Planning Commission meeting has been made for this application in conformance with the County regulations. We recognize that the application will be scheduled before the County Commissioners at a public hearing when the Planning Commission completes their review. A separate public notice will be made for that hearing once that date is set by the staff. Included with this submittal are the additional required copies of the paper application and an electronic copy of the technically complete application on CD. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (970-963-7172) wsconsulting@sopris.net . Sincerely, Western Slope Consulting, LLC Page - 4 Applicant & Consultant Information Property Owner Eastbank, LLC c/o Robert Macgregor 710 East Durant Av W-6 Aspen, CO 81611 970-379-3848 - telephone Planner & Authorized Representative Davis Farrar - Western Slope Consulting LLC 0165 Basalt Mountain Drive Carbondale, Colorado 81623 970-963-7172 - telephone, 970-963-7172 facsimile E-mail: wsconsulting@sopris.net Project Liaison & Authorized Representative Kevin Kiernan – KW Glenwood Springs, LLC PO Box 979 Telluride, Colorado 81435 (619) 517-3525 - telephone E-mail: kevin@thekiernancompanies.com Project Attorney & Authorized Representative David McConaughy - Garfield & Hecht, P.C 420 Seventh Street, Suite 100 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 970-947-1936 - telephone E-mail: dmcconaughy@garfieldhecht.com Project Engineer & Authorized Representative Roger Neal - High Country Engineering 1517 Blake Ave #100 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 (970) 945-8676 - telephone E-mail: rneal@hceng.com Project Surveyor Frank Harrington - High Country Engineering 1517 Blake Ave #100 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 (970) 945-8676 - telephone E-mail: fharrington@hceng.com Page - 5 Land Use Application Form ce Garfteld County Co mmunity Developm ent De p artmen t 108 8 1 h Street, Sui t e 401 Gle nwood Spri ngs, CO 81601 (970) 945 -82U www.garfleld -county .com TYPE OF APPLICATION D Administ rat ive Revi ew D Lim i t ed Impact Review Ii M ajor Impact Rev iew D Amendments to an Approved LUCP O UR O M IR 0 SUP CJ M i nor Tempo ra ry Housi ng Fac ili ty D Vacation of a Co u nty Road/Pub li c ROW -D Location and Ex t ent Review D Compr eh ens ive Plan Amend m ent 0 Major 0 Minor D Pipeline Deve lopment - LAND USE CHANGE PERMIT APPLICATION FORM 0 Development In 100-Year Floodpl ai n D Develo p ment in 100-Year Floodp lai n Variance D Co d e Text Am end m ent D Rezoning 0 Zone Di stnct O PUD 0 PUD Amend ment 0 Administrat ive Interpretati on 0 Appeal o f Ad m inis trative Interpretatio n -0 Areas and Act ivi ties of Sta t e Interest 0 Accommodation Pursuant to Fai r Housi ng Act D Variance D nme Extensi on (also check type of original applicati on) - INVOLVED PARTIES Owner/Applicant ·irrevocable Trust da ted December 27 , 2000 , and Flora Mag regor lrrevocablo Trust daled Doc Name: Ea stbank, LLC ; El izab eth Macgregor* Ph one: (970 13 79-3848 M ailing Address : 710 East Durant Ave W-6 City: Aspen State: CO Zip Co d e : 81611 e-mail: rma c@dunrene@ .com -Representative (A u thoriza t ion Required) Name: Davis Farrar -Western Slope Consulting , LLC Pho n e : ( 970 1963-7172 Mailing Add r ess : 0165 Ba salt Mtn . Dr. City: Carbondal e Sta t e: CO Zi p Code : 81623 e-mail: wsconsulting @sopris .net PROJECT NAME AND LOCATION Project Na m e: Federal Expre ss Ground -Eastbank S ite Major Impact Review & Mi nor Subd ivi sio n Assessor's Parcel Numb e r ; 2185 -353 -04 -00 1 ------------ Physica l/St reet Address : legal Description : Quarter . SW Soct1on 35 Township 6 Range ; 89 Subd1v1sion EASTBANK PARCEL 2 LOT SPLIT PARCE L 2A PLAT REC#8 13402 Zone District: Rural Pr operty Size (acres): 38 .2 "" 27 ber .2000 Page - 6 Page - 7 Agreement to Pay Form ~ Garfteld County PAYMENT AGREEMENT FORM GARFIE 0 LD COUNlY ("COUNlY") and Property Owner ("APPLICANT") Eastbank, LLC; Elizabeth Macgregor Irrevocable Trust dated December 27, 2000; and Flora• agree as follows: 'Macgregor Irrevocable Trust dated December 27, 2000, as te nants-in-common 1. The Applicant has submitted to the County an application for the following Project: __ _ Major Impact Review and Minor Subdivision 2. The Applicant unde rstands and agrees that Garfield County Resolution No. 2014-60, as amended, establishes a fee schedule for each type applicat ion, and the guide l ines for the ~dmlnistration of the fee structure. 3. The Applicant and the County agree that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not poss ible at this time to ascertain the full extent of the costs involved in processing the application. The Applicant agrees to make payment of the Base Fee, established for the Project, an d to thereafter permit addit ional costs to be billed to the App licant. The Applicant agrees to make additional payments upon notification by the County, when they are necessary, as costs are i ncurred. 4. The Base Fee shall be in addition to and exclusive of any cost for publication or cost of consulting serv ice determined necessary by the Board of County Commissioners tor the considerati on of an application or additional County staff time or expense not covered by the Base Fee. If actual recorde d costs exceed the in itial Base Fee, the Applicant shall pay additional billings to the County to re imburse the County for the processing of the Project . The Applicant acknow ledges that all billlng shall be pa i d prior to the final consideration by the County of any Land Us e Change or Divis ion of Land. I hereby agree to pay all fees related to t his application: Billing contact Person:_K_e_v_in_M_._K_ie_r_n_a_n _______ Phone: ( 619 ) 517-3525 Billing Contact Address: _P_._O_. _B_o_x_9_7_9 ___________________ _ Ci ty: Telluri de State: CO Zip Code: _8_1_4_35 ___ _ Bi lling contact Ema il: kevin@t hekiernancompanies.com Printed N me of Person Authorized to Sign: KW Glenwood Springs, LLC, authorized agent of APP LI CANT By: KMK X, LLC , Manager By: \our ine, LLC, Memb r Manager (Da te ) Page - 8 Property Ownership, Surface Use Leases and Mineral Ownership Information -ate advanced title company 622 Rood Avenue Grand Junction, CO 81501 970.255. 7677 ph 970.255. 6491 fax www.advancedtitleco.com TITLE COMMITMENT TRANSMITTAL TO: Roxanne Q. Linscomb Chicago Title Insurance Company 5501 LBJ Freeway, Suite 200 Dallas, TX 75240 COPIES TO: Date: April 9, 2015 Order No. 51280 Property: Colorado State Highway 82, Glenwood Springs, CO 81601/Part of the S1/2 of Section 35, TGS, R89W Parties: Eastbank, LLC, Elizabeth MacGregor Irrevocable Trust and Flora MacGregor Irrevocable Trust/ KW Glenwood Springs, LLC Tax Parcel : Part of 2185-353-04-001 Thank you for choosing Advanced Title Company for this transaction. We are delivering the following to you with copies to the captioned part ies. Title Commitment Tax Certificate(s) D Affidavit for debts, liens, etc. o Other CHARGES: Owner's Policy Extended Coverage Tax Certificate(s) Lender's Policy Endorsement s: $2,254 .00 $65.00 $15.00 $ $ MESSAGE: Legal description changed to reflect entire parcel to be re-subdivided. Page - 9 Al TA Corrmitm?nt (6/17.06 ALTA Commitment Form COMMTIVENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE Issued by STEW l'R T TITLE GU l'RANTY COMP ANY, a Texas Corporation ("Company"), for a valuable consideration, comm its to issue its policy or pJlicies of title insurance, as identified in Schedule A, in favor of the Proposed Insured named in Schedule A as o'Y\Oer or mortgagee of the estate or interest in the land described or referred to in Schedule A, upon pa'yment of the premiums and charges and compliance Wth the Require- ments; all subject to the provisiais of Schedules A and B and to the Condi1ions of this Commitment. This Commitment shall be effective only V\otlen the identity of the P ropcsed Insured and the amount of the policy or policies committed for have been inserted in Schedule A by the Company. All liability and obligation unde' this Commitment shall cease and terminate six months after the Effective Date or \l\hen the policy or policies committed for shall issue, V\hichever first occurs, provided that the failure to issue the policy or policies is not the fault oft he Company. The Company Wll pro~de a sarrple of the Commitment upon request. This Commitment shall not be valid or binding until countersigned by a validating officer or authorized signatory. IN WIT NESS WHERE OF, Ste"" rt Title Guaranty Company has caused Its corporate name and seal to be affixed by its duly authorized offi:ers on the date sho'Y\O in Schedule A. C~rsigned: ill ~-li.LJ Authorized Countersignature Advanced Title Company Company Grand Junction, Colorado Cio/, St"" 004 UN Al TA Comrritment (6117 /06 Page - 10 CONDITIONS 1. The term mortgage, when used herein, shall include deed of trust, trust deed, or other security inst rument 2. If the proposed Insured has or acquires actual knowledge of any defect, lien, encumbrance , adverse claim or other matter affecting the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment other than those shown in Schedule B hereof, and shall fail to disclose such knowledge to the Company in w riting, the Company shall be relieved from liability for any loss or damage resulting from any act of reliance hereon to the extent the Company is prejudiced by fail ure to so disclose such knowledge. If the proposed Insured shall disclose such knowledge to the Company, o r if the Company otherwise acquires actual knowledge of any such defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter, the Company at its option may amend Schedule B of this Commitment accordingly, but such amendment shall not relieve the Company from liability previously incurred pursuant to paragraph 3 of these Conditions and Stipulations. 3. Liability of the Company under this Commitment shall be only to the named proposed Insured and such parties inc luded under the definition of Insured in the form of policy or policies committed for and only for actual loss inc urred in reliance hereon in undertaking in good faith (a) to comply w ith the requirements hereof, or (b) to eliminate exceptions show n in Schedule B, or (c) to acquire or create the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. In no event shall such liability exceed the amount stated in Schedule A for the policy or po lic ies committed fo r and such lia bi lity is subject to the insuring provisions and Conditions and Stipulations and the Exclusions from Coverage of the form of policy or policies committed for in favor of the proposed Insured which are hereby incorporated by refere nce and are made a part of this Commitment except as expressly modified herein. 4. This Commrtment is a contract to issue one or more title insurance policies and is not an abstract of title or a report of t he condition of title. Any action or actions or rights of action that the proposed Insured may have or may bring against t he Company arising out of the status of the title to the estate or interest or the status of the mortgage thereon covered by t his Commitment must be based on and are subject to the provisions of this Commitment. 5. The policy to be issued contains an arbitration clause. All arbitrable matters when the Amount of Insurance is $2,000,000 or Jess shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Insured as the exclusive remedy of the parties You may review a copy of the arbitration rules at<http.l!ww.rv.altaorg/>. All notices required to be given the Company and any statement in w riting required to be furnished the Company shall be addressed to it at P 0 Box 2029, Houston, Texas 77252. Page 2 Page - 11 COMMITMENT FOR TIRE INSURANCE SCHEDULE A File N o. 51280 1 . Effective Date: March 19, 2015 at 7 :30 am 2 . Policy or Policies to be issued: (a) AL TA Ow ner's Policy (6-17-0 6) Prop o sed Ins ured: (b) KW Glenwood Springs, LLC, an Arizona linited liability company Prop o sed Ins ured: Amount $ 1 ,01 2 ,500.00 $ 3. The e stat e or interest in t he l an d described or refe rred to in this Co mm itment is LEASEHOLD TO BE CREATED BY THE INSTRUMENT DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: Ground Lease executed by Eastbank, LLC, a Colorado linited liability company, Elizabeth MacGregor Irrevocable Trust dated December 27, 2000 and Flora MacGregor Irrevocable Trust dated December 27, 2000, as lessor, to KW Glenwood Springs, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company, as lessee, dated December 17, 2014, the Memorandum o f which i s recorded March 17, 2015 in Book at Reception No. 860458. Said Lease affects a part of the Land herein. 4 . Tille t o the LEASEHOLD estate or interest i n t h e land is at the effectiv e dale h ereof v ested in: KW Glenwood Springs, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company, as lessee under Ground Lease ex ecuted by Eastbank, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, Elizabeth MacGregor Irrevocable Trust dated December 2 7, 2000 and Flora MacGregor Irrevocable Trust dated December 27, 2000, as lessor, to KW Glenwood Springs, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company, as lessee, dated December 17, 2014, the Memorandum of which i s recorded March 17, 2 015 in Book at Reception No. 860458. Fee title is v ested in: Eastbank, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, Elizabeth MacGregor Irrevocable Trust dated Dec ember 27, 2000 and Flora MacGregor Irrevocable Trust dated December 27, 2000, as their interest may appear. Cou nter signed Stat ement of Charg es A dvanced Tille Comp any These c h arg es are due and payab le before a Policy can be iss ued: Po licy $2,254.00 By: ¥rlW-C . ~ Tax Certific ate{s) $1 5.00 Auth orize d S ig natory Thi s polic y v alid only if Sch ed ule Bis attach ed ALTA Co mmitm ent (6/17/06) Copyright 20 0 6-2009 America n L a nd Title Association . All righ ts reserved. Th e use of thi s f o rm is restricted t o AL TA licensees an d AL T A manbers in go od stan ding as of the da te of use. All other uses are prohibited. R ep rinted under license fro m the American L and Title Association . Page - 12 COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE SCHEDULE A (continued) 5. The land referred lo in this C omm lt m enl is described as f oll ows: See Schedule A (continued) ALTA Commitment (6117/06) File No. 51280 Copyright 2006-20 09 American L a nd Title Association. All rights r eseIVed. Th e use of this Fo rm i s restricted to ALTA licensees and AL TA members in good stan ding as of the date of us e. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American L and Title Associ ation. Page - 13 Part of Parcel 2A , COMMITMENT FOR Tllt.E INSURANCE SCHEDULE A (continued) LEGAL DES CRIPTION EASTBANK PARCEL 2 L OT SPLIT, according to the plat thereof filed J anu ary 18, 201 2 at Reception No. 813402 County of Garfield, S t ate of Co lorado File No.51280 N OTE: The exact legal d escription is to be based on a survey of subject Land. Additional Exc eptions may res ult. For identification purp oses only; Part of Parcel No. 2185-353-04-001 A LTA Commitment (6/1 7/0 6) Copyright 2006-2009 American Land Title Association. A ll rights reseIVed. Th e use of this F onn i s restricted to ALT A licensees and AL T A m embers in good standin g as of the date of use. All other uses are pro hibited. R ep rint ed under license from the Americ an Land Title Association. Page - 14 COMMITMENT FOR TITI.E INSURANCE SCHEDULES PARTI The following requirements must be met: 1. Instruments in insurable form , Vv11ich must be ex ecuted, delivered and duly filed for record: Fil e No. 51280 a. Ground Lease Agreement by and between Eastbank, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, Bizabeth MacGregor Irrevocable Trust dated December 27, 2000 and Flora MacGregor Irrevocable Trust dated December 27, 2000, as Landlord, and KW Glenwood Springs, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company, as Tenant. NOTE: Statement of Authority for Eastbank, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company recorded January 18, 2012 at Reception No. 813404 discloses the following name(s) of the parties authorized for said company and otherwise complying with Colorado Revised Statutes 38-30-172: Robert Duncan MacGregor, President of Dunrene Management. Inc.. a Colorado corporation. Manager of Eastbank, LLC. NOTE: Statement of Authority for Dunrene Management, Inc. recorded June 30, 2009 at Reception No. 770437 discloses the following name(s) of the parties authorized for said company and otherwise complying with Colorado Revised Statutes 38-30-172: Robert Duncan MacGregor, President of Dunrene Management, Inc .. a Colorado corporation. NOTE: Statement of Authority for Elizabeth MacGregor Irrevocable Trust dated December 27, 2000 recorded June 30, 2009 at Reception No. 770439 discloses the following name(s) of the parties authorized for said company and otherwise complying with Colorado Revised Statutes 38-30-172: Steven M. Marolt, Trustee. NOTE: Statement of Authority for Flora MacGregor Irrevocable Trust dated December 27, 2000 recorded June 30, 2009 at Reception No. 770440 discloses the following name(s) of the parties authorized for said company and otherwise complying with Colorado Revised Statutes 38-30-172: Steven M. Marolt. Trustee. NOTE: The Memorandum of Lease recorded March 17, 2015 at Reception No. 860458 satisfies this Requirement. 2. You must tell us in writing the name of anyone not referred t o in this Commitment who will get an interest in the land or who will make a loan on the land. We may then make additional requirements or exceptions. 3. Payment of all taxes and assessments, levied and assessed against subj ect premises, which are due and payable. County Parcel Number: Part of 2185-353-04-001. Tax Certificate. 4. Affidavit as to debts, liens, and other matters from the owner in a form acceptable to the Title Company. 5. ALTA/ACSM Land Title Survey in accordance with the 2011 Minimum Standard Detail Requirements must be submitted to the Company for review and approval. Additional Requirements and/or Exceptions may result. ALTA Com mitm ent (611 7/06) Copy right 2006-20 09 Ameri<an Land Title Association. All rights reserved. Th e use of this Fo rm i s restricted to AL TA licens ees and AL TA members in good standing as of the date of use All other uses are prohibited. R ep rinted under license from the A m erican L and Titl e Associ ation . Page - 15 File N o. 51280 COMMITMENT FOR Tlll.E INSURANCE SCHEDULE B -PART II Schedule B of the policy or policies lo be issued will contain exceptions lo the following matters unless the same are disposed of lo the satisfaction of the Company. 1. Rights or claims of parties in possession, not shown of public record. 2. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public record. 3. Any encroachm en!, encumbrance , v iolation, variation, or adverse circumstance affecting the title that would be disclosed by an accurat e and complete land survey of the Land and not sh own by the public records. 4 . Any lien, or right lo a lien, for servi ces , l abor or material heretofore or hereafter furni shed, imposed by l aw and not shown by the public records. 5 . Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters , if any, created , first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent lo the Effective Dale her eof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires for value of record the estate or intere st or mortgage thereon cov ered by this Com mitment. NOTE: Exceptions 1 through 5 will not appear on the policy(ies) to be issued hereunder once all Schedule B -Part I Requirements have been satisfied and the Company closes the transaction. 6. (a) Unpalenled mini ng claim s; (b) rese rvations or ex cepti ons in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance there of; (c) Minerals of whatsoever kind, subsurface and surface su bstances , in , on, under and that may be produced from the Land , together with all rights, privileges , and immunities relating thereto , whether or not the m alters excepted under (a), (b) or (c) are shown by the Public Records or listed in Schedule B . 7. Water rights, claims or title lo waler. 8 . Taxes or special assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the public records. 9 . Taxes for the y ear 2015, and subsequent years ; special assessments or charges not certified to the County Treasurer. Tax ID Number: Part of 2185-353-04-001 10. Reservations and ex ceptions in Patents, or Acts authorizing the issuance thereof, including the res ervations of the rig hi of way for ditch es or canals constructed by the authority of t he United States , as reserved in United stales Patent recorded May 20, 1899 al Reception No. 2 1746 . 11. Reservations and ex ceptions in Patent s, or Acts authorizi ng the issuance thereof, includi ng the reservations of the right of prop riet or of a vein or lode lo extract and remov e his ore th erefrom sh ould t he same be fou nd lo penetrate or intersect the premises as reserved i n United Slates Patent recorded May 20, 1899 al Reception No . 21746. 12. Easem ents granted t o The Mountain States Teleph on e and Telegraph Company by instrument recorded August 29, 1929 al Reception No. 105227, and by instrument recorded July 13 , 1931 at Reception No. 110547 . 13. Easement granted lo The Mountai n Stales Telephone and Telegraph Company by inslrum en! recorded October 29, 1964 al Reception No. 227425. AL TA Co mmitm ent (6117106) Copyright 2006-2009 American Land Title Association. All righ1s r eserved . Th e use of this Fa nn is restricted to AL TA lic ensees m d AL TA memben; in goo d stmding as of the date of use. All other uses :ire prohibited. R eprinted under license from the A meri can L and Title Association. -....... ,(:, .. Page - 16 COMMITMENT FOR Tllt.E INSURANCE SCHEDULE B -PART II (continued) F ile No. 51280 14. Terms, conditions, provisions , agreements and obligations as contained in Garfield County Resolution 81- 387 recorded December 22, 1981 at Reception No. 322946. 15. Terms , conditions, provisions , agreements and obligations as contained in Garfield County Resolution 83- 122 recorded May 17 , 1983 at Reception No. 342137. 16. Easement for Water Line granted to Leo Jammaron by instrum ent recorded February 15, 19 85 at Re c eption No. 359483 . 17. Terms. conditions. provisions . agreements and obligations as contained in Garfield County Resolution 97- 92 recorded October 7, 1997 at Reception No. 514786 . 18. (Intentionally Onitted). 19. Agriculture Encroachment License with The Roaring Fork Transportation Authority as set forth by instrument recorded Au gust 22, 20 0 5 at Re ception No. 680632. 20. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and ob ligations of Lease from Eastbank, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, Elizabeth MacGregor Irrevocable Trust dated December 27, 2000 , a Colorado trust and Flora MacGregor Irrevocable Trust dated December 27, 2000, a Colorado trust, as Landlord, and KW Glenwoo d Springs, LLC , an Arizona limited liabillty company as evidenced in Memorandum of Lease recorded March 17 , 20 15 at Reception No. 860458. ALT A Com mitm ent (6117 /06) Copyright 2006-2009 Ameli<:an Land Title Association. A ll rights reseIVed. The us e of thi s F onn is restricted to AL TA lic ensees and A L TA members in good standing as of the date o f use All other uses are prohibited. R ep rinted under license from the American Land Title A ssoci ation. Page - 17 DISCLOSURES Order No.: 51280 Pursuant to C.R.S. 10-11-122, notice is hereby given that: (A) THE SUBJECT REAL PROPERTY MAY BE LOCATED IN A SPECIAL TAXING DISTRICT; (B) A CERTIFICATE OF TAXES DUE LISTING EACH TAXING JURISDICTION SHALL BE OBTAINED FROM THE COUNTY TREASURER OR THE COUNTY TREASURER'S AUTHORIZED AGENT; (C) INFORMATION REGARDING SPECIAL DISTRICTS AND THE BOUNDARIES OF SUCH DISTRICTS MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, THE COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER, OR THE COUNTY ASSESSOR Note: Colorado Division of Insurance Regulations 3-5-1, Paragraph C of Article VII requires that "Every title entity shall be responsible for all matters which appear of record prior to the time of recording whenever the title entity conducts the closing and is responsible for recording or filing of legal documents resulting from the transaction which was closed." Provided that Advanced Title Company conducts the closing of the insured transaction and is responsible for recording the legal documents from the transaction, exception number 5 will not appear on the Owner 's Title Policy and the Lender's Title Policy when issued. Note: Affirmative Mechanic's Lien Protection for the Owner may be available (typically by deletion of Exception No. 4 of Schedule B, Section 2 of the Commitment from the Owner 's Policy to be issued) upon compliance with the following conditions: A. The land described in Schedule A of this commitment must be a single-family residence, which includes a condominium or townhouse unit. B. No labor or ma terials have been furnished by mechanics or materialmen for purposes of construction on the land described in Schedule A of this Commitment within the past 6 months. C. The Company must r eceive an appropriate affidavit indemnifying the Company against unfiled Mechanic's and Materialmen's Liens. D. The Company must receive payment of the appropriate premium. E. If there has been construction, improvements or major repairs undertaken on the property to be purchased, within six months prior to the Date of the Commitment, the r equirements to obt ain coverage for umecorded liens will include: disclosure of certain construction information; fin ancial information as to the seller, the builder and/or the contractor; payment of the appropriate premium; fully executed Indemnity agreements satisfactory to the company; and, any a ddition al requirements as may be n ecessary after an examination of the aforesaid information by the Company. No coverage will be given under any circumstances for labor or material for which the insured has contracted for or agreed to pay. To comply with the provisions of C.R.S. 10-11-123, the Company makes the following disclosure: (a) That there is recorded ev idence that a mineral estate h as been severed, leased or otherwise conveyed from the surface estate and that there is a substantial likelihood that a third party holds some or all interest in oil, gas, other minerals, or geothermal energy in the property; and (b) That such mineral estate may include the right to enter and use the property without the sur face owner's permission. NOTE: THIS DISCLOSURE APPLIES ONLY IF SCHEDULE B , SECTION 2 OF THE TITLE COMMITMENT HEREIN INCLU DES AN EXCEPTION FOR SEVERED MINERALS. NOTHING HEREIN CONTAINED WILL BE DEEMED TO OBLIGATE THE COMPANY TO PROVIDE ANY OF THE COVERAGES REFERRED TO HEREIN, UNLESS THE ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE FULLY SATISFIED. File Number: 51280 CO C ommitment Disclosu re Page - 18 STG Privacy Notice 1 (Rev 01/26/09) Stewart Title Companies WHAT DO THE STEWART TITLE COMPANIES DO WITH YOUR PERSONAL INFORMATION ? Federal and applicable state law and regulations give consumers the right to limit some but n ot all sharing. Federal and applicable state law regulations also require us to tell you how we collect, share, and protect your personal information. Please read this notice carefully to understand how we use your personal information. This privacy notice is distributed on behalf of the Stewart Title Guaranty Company and its affiliates (the Stewart Title Companies), pursuant to Title V of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA). The types of personal information we collect and share depend on the product or service that you have sought through us . This information can include social security numbers and driver's license number. All financial companies, such as the Stewart Title Companies, need to share customers' person al information to run their ever yd a y business-to process transactions and maintain customer accounts. In the section below, we list the reasons that we can sh are customers' personal information; the reasons that we choose to share; and whether you can limit this sharing. Reasons we can share your personal information Dowe share? Can you limit this sharing? For our everyday business purposes-to process your transactions and maintain your account. This may include running the business and managing customer Yes No accounts, such as processing transactions, mailing, and auditing services, and responding t o court orders and legal investigations . For our marketing purposes-to offer our products and services to you. Yes No For joint marketing with other financial companies No We don't share For our affiliates' everyday business purposes-information about your transactions and experiences. Affiliates are companies r elated by common ownership or control. They can be financial and nonfinancial companies. Our Yes No affiliates may include companies with a Stewart name; financial companies, such as Stewan Title Comp any For our affiliates' everyday business purposes-information about your No We don't share creditworthiness. For our affiliates to market to you Yes No For nonaffiliates to market to you. Nonaffiliates are companies n ot r elated by No We don't share common ownership or control. They can be financial and nonfinancial companies. We may disclose your personal information to our affiliates or to non affiliates as permitted by law. If you r equest a transaction with a nonaffiliate, such as a third party insurance company, we will disclose your personal information to that nonaffiliate. [We do n ot control their subsequent use of information, and suggest you refer to their privacy notices.] Sharing practices How often do the Stewart Title Companies We must notify you about our sharing practices when you request a transaction. notify me about their practices? How do the Stewart Title Companies To protect your personal information from unauthorized a=ss and use, we use protect my personal information? security measures that comply with federal and state law. These measures include computer, fil e, and building safeguards. How do the Stewart Title Companies We collect your personal information, for example, when you collect my personal information? • r equest insurance-related ser vices • provide such infor mation to u s We a lso collect your personal informat ion from others, such as the real estate agent or lender involved in your transaction, credit reporting agencies, affiliates or other companies. What sharing can I limit? Although federal and state law give you the right t o limit sharing (e.g., opt out) in certain instances, we do n ot share your personal information in those instances. Contact Us I If you have any questions about this privacy n otice , please contact us at: Stewart Title Guaranty Company, 1980 P ost Oak Blvd., Pri vacy Officer, Hou ston , Texas 77056 File No.: 51280 Page - 19 STG Privacy Notice 2 (Rev 01/26/09) Independent Agencies and Unaffiliated Escrow Agents WHAT DOES THE ADVANCED TITLE COMPANY DO WITH YOUR PERSONAL INFORMATION? Federal and applicable state law and regulations give consumers the right to limit some but n ot all sharing. Federal and applicable state l aw regulations also require us to tell you how we collect, share, and protect your p ersonal information. Please r ead this n otice carefully to understand how we use your personal information. This privacy notice is distributed on behalf of Advanced Title Company and its affiliates(" NIA "),pursuant to Title V of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley A ct (GLBA). The types of p ersonal information we collect and share dep end on the product or ser vi ce that you h ave sought t hrough us. This information can include socia l s ecurity number s and driv er 's license number. All financial companies, such as , n eed to share custom ers' personal informa ti on to run the ir everyday busin ess -to process transactions and maintain customer accounts. In the section b elow, we list the reasons that we can share customers' p ersonal information; the r easons that we choose to share; and whether you can limit this sharin . Reasons we can share your personal information Dowe share? Can you limit this sharing? For our everyday business purposes -to process your transactions and maintain your account. This may include running the business and managing customer Yes No accounts , such as processing transactions, mailing, and auditing ser vices, and resp onding to cour t orders and legal investigations. For our marketing purposes -to offer our products and services to you. Yes No For joint marketing with other financial companies No We don't sh are For our affiliates' everyday bminess purposes -information about your transactions and experiences. Affiliates are companies related by common Yes No ownership or control. They can be financial and nonfin anci al companies. For our affiliates' everyday business purposes -information about your N o We don't share creditworthiness. For our affiliates to market to you Y es No For nonaffiliates to market to you. Nonaffiliates are companies n ot related by N o We don't sh are common ownership or control. They can be fin ancial and n onfinancial c omp anies. We may disclose your per sonal in formation to our affiliates or to n on a ffiliates as permitted by law. If you r equest a transaction with a nonaffiliate, such as a third party insurance company, we will disclose your personal information to that nonaffiliate . [We do n ot control their subsequent use of information , and suggest you refer to their privacy n otices.] Sharing practices How often doldoes Advanced Title We must notify you ab out our sh aring practices when you request a transaction . Company notify me about their practices? How do/does Advanced Title Compa n y To protect your pers onal informa ti on from unauthorized access and us e, we use security protect my personal information? measures that comply wi th federal and state law. These measures include computer, fil e, and building safeguards. How doldoes Advanced Title Company We co llect your personal information, for exampl e, when you collect my persona l informa tion? • request insurance-related services • provide such infotmation to us We also co ll ect yo ur personal information fr om others, such as th e real es tate age nt or lender invol ved in your transaction, credit reporting agencies, affiliates or other companies. What sharing can I limit? Although federal and state law give you the right to limit sharing (e.g., opt ou t) in certam ins tances, we do n ot share your persona l information in those instanc es. Contact Us If you have any questions about this privacy notice, please contact us at: 622 Rood A venue Grand ,}unction, CO 81501 ; 970-255-7677 File N o.: 51280 Page - 20 I llllll lllll lllllll Ill 111111111111111111111111111111111 697251 05/09/2006 12 :31P 91796 P192 n At.SDORF 1 of 3 R 16.00 D 125.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO ........ ,. ............. _________ _ _o•cloc~-.-t--------,OEPU='-,~~A WARRANTY DEED THJ¥ t>U:D, *Cle on tMs d•Y of ,,11a,.yL-0"'3,,_,._,2,_,o"'o"''--------'' bl tween cozy PODIT. L. p., " COLORADO LZlCtTKD PARDIJllS1IJ:P of tk• County of PXTKI:!J •nd It.ta a f COt.O!UUJO JIASTllANl'., LLC, A COUJllADO LJXU'llD Lll!IU.XTT COllP~ . of the Grant•<•>: WI'JttBSS, Thet tht 8tantorCal, for Md fn c~fd1r•tion of the II.ISi af ($1,250,000 .0Q ••• 0.. M111lop Two H\lndnd P'J.fty Thaufftnd aa4 00/JDO .... DOLLAJIB tha r~•ipt Ind 1uff1dency of 14\f cti fa h.rllby ec:krvilledaMI, t\1& 1r~tec!, blrgafned, H l d d-d can'tll'fad, ard by these prnent• den 1r-1rrt, blra•ln, nll, antev lrd cenfil'M \ltto th• Grant.CO, hi• hairs and ••t fl"MI fot"eWr, all th• re1l Pf"OP9rty, tageth•r wt th i1P"ll'YIDf'rtl:. it arrt~ •it·U.t•, lyfna .-d brine in the CatJnty of M:lnKLI! wd State af Colc:u·•cb, delcrlbed u fol laws: SD UllDIT "A" A'l'TACDD llQ&TO AJlll DI>• A l'All2.' lllUOll' 1lao knoMn u 1tnet l'IUIJtlar 3925 COUNT!' ROAD 154 GLBNWOOD SPR.Dlas CO 81601 'l'OOSTBBR vltti. al t .-El 1f np.il1r and tl1r8dlt:.mwltt: and IPP'l"'tanwi:u theret:o bal qinQ, or fn anywlsa .,..,.tafnffll ~ ttie rewrston Wld r1Wr$fcnt, rMtinder Ind rfllllli11nd4trs, r11nu, tuuH ard prvflt• thareof; end •\ l th• •t•t•, right tftte fnter•t, clef• •nd -.nd Hh•tslWnr of die i:r.ntcrh>, •Ith.er fn law or equity, of, In and to th• llbaw t.raa1Md ptWii..-, Mith th heredfhaenu tnd apprttnwicu; TOBA.VEA..NDTOBOLD the H i d pr•f&ea ._. l:wgmfnad •rd .. crlbmd wtt.h ~.,., unta th• Qrlnt .. (•), hh tielr1 and an1p for•Y•r-. Th• GrlltltorC•J. for hi,..tf, Ma h1fra .-.d peraatt•l reprMtnt1tfYes, dom cCIVWllltrt, 1r11nt, bl,...fn, M'td •gr-to and vitti th• Crmt•(•), •f• h•irs end ms•f-. t:tlat at the ti• of th• .,..una W •U""ry of ttlen presenn, !\a 1'• well ••tud u1 th• pr•taes llboYe c:Ol"IW'f9d, hP QOOd, Mir'•, ptl"f-=t, at..lut1 and frdlt.s1bl• ••tat"• of 1n.'Mrf tenc•, i n h1M, ht fu •flllf)l•, d Ma toad' rfght, tuH powe"r n l•ful IUthorfty to ar1nt1 b1rgaln, Hll •nd c onvey th• ... in _.,.,. mnd 1on1 aa afore&efd, W'ld th1t the .... in free and clear frm atl fc .... r •rd ath•r s r.,ts, btrpftW, Hl•, l ten1, tM8, •u•_,u, encuabr~• arm rMt tictt..,. of Mh1tewer k fnd ar rwtllre aoaver, ..no -.S. ,._ .._, ~ nia. _. ..._. ~IU _.., ... ....,.. mu Miii'....,.,.,. ft 1llDaS ~ M _., .1';lmS - &DJll.D" ••• .lftlldDD.....,,, .am ~ --=m, MD (l-J JWS=-rD.J .r.&Nm!MO DI......_ a.aJil.?•1 (IJ ~ ~or .au-a ~' t~J ~ z.muaw.o °' 11a ~' UJ .anmu z.aa ~a •mr ~ JlD'JICW»o1 f$} ~ r.an •~ • csomo ~, ''' m-~a..-....,.. ~ u, J,.o, ff'I ~ ...._.~.DUS,........ J.I, JOH/ (IJ Mir~ .UJllUl::UU, ~~ ..__._- ~.anr,... JUtO...,... ~ •r .anaa ma CDm&lllll"--.. ta..._. ...-....,., !IC. ~ma --.r...,_ ~ --· Th• Grantot(I) sh•tl vd wtll WMUMT MD IOREVEI OEP?ND the aboW berpfned ""91ri&H In the CJl'•t .vd pa1celbt• pa.&ae.ston of the QrwttnC•l. ht1 h•ir• 1nd aufgrw1 111fnst all •rd witrv pancn or P*f9GfW l.wtullv ~l1tllrin1 th• Mhot• or wrt P"ft thtrwaf .. The •lnDUltr f'AlllW:r •h•ll lnclUde tha plural, W1d t.tn~ plural th• t1111Uhr~ llnd tfle w1 of Wft/ lmdar lll•ll bo "A>lleoblo to •l l .-•. IN Wll'NlllWJD:aJ'.01' tht CnntDt(•) hu -.ecuted thi• deed on ttl• dat• Ht forttt .tx.w. Sf~T! OF CQLOJWlQ , .... -----county of ~•uX~TXllf==----' !.ICrOll# iaQ.4A5ll Thld GIR40533 fOMI IZ 08/29/04 \l>.CPEtl WAIWTY DUD (Phatogr le) c::ozy l'OOO, L.P .• A COLollADO IJMrl1!P PAll1'Nl!RlllllP BY:~ BY: . -----,,. B.~DAJU..BNB M . • Page - 21 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 697251 05/05/2006 12 :31P 81796 P193" ALSOORF 2 of 3 R 16 .00 D 125 .00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO EXHIBIT A A 27% un d ivided interest as tenancy in common to the fol lowing : A PAl<CllL 01' LAllll LQCATIQ) DI 'l'llli SOtJTB Blll' 01' SllCTIOll 35, TOllN8BlP 6 SOtrm, -· 89 WIST or '?Bii 6'rll PRlllCl:PAL IGlllIDDIJI, LYDIQ 1'0RTllJIRLY AJlll llllSftllLY 01' 'l'D CD'l'JalLDlll OJ' 'l'llli JICWUJIO l'OU lll:VD 7'1111 S0l1'11111UTllllLY OJ '?Bii llOARDIQ IOU: RAll.!10.flD JIOLllIJm AllTllOllrn UQllT 01' llAY LIJQI A11D OOLOllllDO Sll!l'll BXGlllfAT 12 RIClll'Z 01' lfAY LDB llOllll PAll'r:tCllLDLY DJISCRIJIJll) AS l'OLLOllS 1 llJIGDDIDIG AT A PDDI'? 01' ':1111 SOtmllGlll'RR!.Y Rl:ml'r or to.Y LDIJI OlJ COLOllWJO .1'1'.Arl B'.X<lllnY 82. A llllllll AlUl CAP l'OlJRI DI PLM:ll, lllDDlCll TD 800'1'IDIA8r OOllRU or SA:m SllC'r:unr 35 , llSJJIQ A 31/•• ALtlllillllll c:A7 JlllAllll II l 7 DBGRBBS 33•u• • 2075.56 mr, TlDlllC. s 33 DmGRDS 25 • s&• " 337 .42 nsr ro Tiii ClllB'llllr.XD or T11J1 llOUDIG l'Oll llVER1 TlDlllCll Tiii POLLOlfDIU ll OOOllSll8 AL01'0 •All> Cl:ll'l'lllUoinl or %111 RO.UllfG lJOIUt a:rn:R1 1. 11 n D-.s n•n• "111 .30 nmr, 2. S 87 DllGIUlllB 57 131" 1f 342.00 l'Jlr:1 3. a es :osausa n • 31• " 3•2. oo l'llBT1 4. s n D....Us oe•n• " 517 .oo rnr1 S . B tB DllG•Ullll" 53 '3l.• 1f 332 • 00 PUTp s. so DmallllB ss•n• "Jn.oo 1'11S'l1 7, JI' 7' DllGaJIBS 51' 2l.• 1f 111 . '7 l'Dr1 8. ll 12 a-IDB o.•oe• "3'4 .12 1'D'l'1 9. 11 58 DllGllJIH Ja 12s• "lH.91 :narr1 10 . II 33 D-n•at• "445.U l'D'l'J ll . Ii 2 4 DBWIDB 30'30" If 284 ,61 l'JIBT TO Tllll lfBSTULY Llllll OJ' SAZil BllC'nOll 351 '?llllliCll >I 08 D-U•U• B 726 .25 l'Jlft ALOllG SAl:D llllllTllllLT Lillll TO S'Rll cmrna.r.I.11 a• SUD IU'ID1 S'llllllCS 11 37 _, u•u• • us.es lllUIT ALO>IQ nm CJ:.11'1'11Rf,XD1 T.llllllCB If U DJllQRDS 52'll• B 315.63 l'D'r ALOJCQ SA:m ClD1'1'1DLDlll1 TllBllO ff 01 DlllDDS SS' 52 • II ·51, 77 PDT ALOJ«I SA:µ> CSJmlllL:tJIS TO 'l'Bll Jroll':nlllRLY LDlll or DXD SOIJTll llALI' op 8AlJI BllC"l'XO• 3 51 TllJRllO S 89 DllCDllllS 5''21" • 15H.30 nJIT ALOllG SAXll JIDHIDQLY L:OO: TO Tm: SOll'l'BllZllT&JILY llmu' OlJ WAT Lill'I OP '1'1111 llOllll:tHC l'OU llAir.JtOal> BOLDDQ Atrrl!OIU'l'r • 'rlllll(l:J: ALOllQ 8All> SC1D'mlfllBTllRLT UIOBT OF 111.T t.:tllll .At.OllQ .A --~ C!JllV1I TO Tin: LUT BAVDIG A RAD:ru8 01' 1960.00 J'llln', A CSll'rRAL MIGLll OP 20 -8 01'23•, ""'AllC DZllTAllCll OJ', .. _,, FBB'l', .llll> A ?.OllQ ClllDID or s "DllGllBll& 02'2l" JI 681.U nft1 TKIDiCll II !6 DBOllllllll 03 '0!" B 324.0 :nsT ALOllV BA.Jl) S01"J'llllllSUIU',,Y Ll:Jlll !l'O '1'Ull SOtmlllllllUJILY llrlillll' OP !CAY L:t>llf OP COLOUl>O SrATll JU~ 82 1 '1'DllCll S 4.0 ~8 (8 1 40° B 132.'1 1'1111'1' ALOJfQ SAm ll01J:rllllllll'l'llllt.Y URll; 'rlllll!Cll II 46 DllGD:llS 55' 22• JI l04 . 80 Rl'l' .ALCllG BAD> S01l':lllQ:lll'DLY LDlll1 mJlllCS S 51 D.BGllDS 02' U • JI 111, 93 J'DT AU>llQ SAlll SOU':llllll8'l'lllU.T LXllB1 '1'Kmla S 5' bBOllDS 30 •40" ll 186.78 l'BllT ALOllG SAZD llO'IJ1'lllllR'Y LDlll1 'rllllllCJI 8 55 DSmtDll 51°0• ll 181 .61 nBT JUDB'G SAXD 9011'rBllllll:rnLY LDlll1 TID>ICB 8 57 D:GRDll 02'15" • to.'1 PD'l' ALOllQ SAID 9Dtm111118'l'DLY LDlll TO '1'Ull POZRT 01' BllOllQIIJIG. torJi W111TA 01/17/03 Page - 22 . · 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 697251 05/05/2006 12:31P 817!16 P194 " ALSDORF 3 of 3 R 16 .00 0 125.00 GARFlELO COUNTY CO EXHIBlT 'B' Our Order No. GW248533-5 RIGHT OF PROPRIETOR OF A VEIN OR LODE TO EXTRACT AND REMOVE ms ORE THEREPROM SHOUW THE SAME BB POUND TO PENETRATE OR INTERSBCT THE PREMISES AS R&5ERVBD IN UNITI!D STATES PATENT REmRDBD May 20, 1899, IN BOOK 12 AT PAGE 508, AND RECORDE!D JUNE 1, 1899 IN BOOK 12 AT PAGE 5!0ANDAT PAGE 511 AND AT PAGE512 . RIGHT OF WAY FOR DITCHES OR CANALS CONSTRUCTED BY THE AUTHORITY OF THE UNITED STATES AS RESERVED IN UNITED Sl'ATBS PATENT RECORDED May 20, 1899, IN BOOK 12 AT PAGE 508, AND AS REroRDED JUNE 1, 1899 IN BOOK 12 AT PAGE 510ANDATPAGBS11ANDAT PAGE512. UTILITY BASEMENT AS GRANTED TO MOUNTAIN STATES TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED August 29, 1929, IN BOOK 161 AT PAGE 261 AND AS RECORDEDJULY 13 , 1931 IN BOOK 164 AT PAGE 152 AND AS RECORDED OCTOBER 29 , 1964 IN BOOK 361 AT PAGE 477. TERMS, CONDmONS AND PROVISIONS OF EASEMENT FOR WATER LINE RECORDED February 15, 1985 IN BOOK 664 AT PAGE 356. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF RESOLlTTlON NO 97-92 RECORDED October 07, 1997 IN BOOK 1037 AT PAGE 381.. RIGHT OF WAY FOR THE DENVER AND RIO GRANDE WESTERN RAlLWA Y. RIGHT OF WAY FOR THE ROARING FORK RIVER. ANY QUESTION , DISPUTE OR ADVERSE CLAIMS AS TO ANY LOSS OR GAIN OF LAND AS A RESULT OF ANY CHANGE IN THE RIVER. BED LOCATION BY NATURAL OR OTHER THAN NATURAL CAUSES, OR ALTERATION THROUGH ANY CAUSE, NATURAL OR UNNATURAL, OF THE CBNTER THREAD, BANK, OiANNBL OR PLOW OF WATERS IN THE ROARING FORK RIVER RIVER LYING WITIDN SUBJBCT LAND; AND ANY QUESTION AS TO THE LOCATION OF SUOI CENTBR THREAD, BED , BANK OR CHANNEL AS A LEGAL DESCRIPTION MONUMENT OR MARKER FOR PURPOSES OF DESCRIBING OR LOCATING SUBJBCT LANDS. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT RECORDED February 02, 2001INBOOK1230 AT PAGE 47 . ENCROACHMENT OF FENCE ON THE RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY AS SHOWN ON IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT DATED SEPTEMBER 17 , 1999, PREPARED BY WHITE SURVEYING. ENCROACHMENT 01' CONTRACTOR'S YARD ON TO ADJOINING PARCEL AS SHOWN ON IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT DATED SEPTBMBER 17 , 1999 , PREPARED BY WHITE SURVEYING. Page - 23 · 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 692373 02/15/2006 02:55P 81772 PS07 " ALSDORF 1 of 2 R 11.00 D 17 .00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO GENERAL WARRANTY DEED Cozy Point, L.P., a Colorado limited partnership, whose address is % B. Joseph Krabacher, Esq., Krabacher & Sanders, P.C., 201 N . Mill Street, Suite 201, Aspen, Colorado, 81611; for One Hundred Seventy Thousand Dollars ($170,000.00) and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, hereby bargains, sells and conveys to the Elizabeth Macgregor Irrevocable Trust dated December 27, 2000, whose address is% Steven M. Marolt, Marolt & Replinger, CPA's, 230 S. Mill Street, Aspen, Colorado 81611 an undivided six and one-half percent (6.5%) tenant- in-common interest in and to the following real property in Garfield County, Colorado: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein Together wi th and equal undivided interest in and to hereditaments including water rights and interests, and all its appurtenances and warrants the title against all persons, subject to taxes for 2004 and thereafter, and subject to the matters of record as of the date hereof STATE OF Ca!or4d.o COUNTY OF be...-. Ve..< SELLER: Cozy Point, L.P., a Colorado limited partnership, . By: cx.?7~ --T-~ Darlene Friedland as President of Cozy Point V entures, Inc ., general partner. Date: 5 u. I y 11 , 2004 The foregoing General Warranty Deed was acknowledged before me this /7' day of JU-/ I./ , 2004 by Darlene Friedland as President of Cozy Point Ventures, Inc., a Colofado corporation, the general partner of Cozy Point, L.P., a Colorado limited partnership. Witness my hand and official seal My Commislion Expires My Commission Expires: 02/13/2007 Recording requested by: Thomas J. Hartert. Esq . Balcomb & Green , P .C. PO Drawer 790 Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 (970) 945-6466 Page - 24 1111111 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 692373 02/15/2006 02:55P 81772 P508 " ALSDORF 2 of 2 R 11.00 D 17.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION A parcel ot land located in the South Half of Section 35, Township 6 South, Rang• 89 west of the 6th Principal Her1dian, lying northerly and easterly of th• centerline ot th• Roaring Fork R1ver and •outbwe•t•rly of th• Roaring Fork Rallroad Holding Authority right-ot-w•y line and Colorado State Highway 82 right-of-way line more particularly described as follow•: Beginning at a point on th• southwesterly right-of-way line ot Colorado State Highway 82, a rebar aad cap found in place, wba.ace the southeast corner ot said Section 35, being a 3 1/4• aluminum cap bears S.37°33'42• B. 2 015.65 feet; thence s.33•25'56• Pl. 337 .42 feet to the centerline of the Roaring Fork River; thence th• following 11 cour••• along said centerline ot the Roaring Fork River; l. N.12"23'29• "'· 116.30 teat; 2. S.81°57'31" w. 342 .00 feet; 3. s .ss•23•31• w. 342 . 00 feet; 4. S.66°08 '31• 5. S.48°53'31• 6. S.69°55'31 " 7. N.79°5l '21• 8 . N. 72°04'08" 9. N.58"38'29" 10. N .33"42'29• ll . N .24"30'30" thence N. 09•45•43• of said ri var; thence N .31°51'14" thence N.42°52'31" thence N.01°55 '52" of said South Hali w. Pl . w. w. w. Pl. w. Pl. E . B. B. B . 511 .00 feet; 332 .00 feet; 363. 00 feet; 181.97 feet; 394.82 teat; 198. 91 teat; 445 .43 feet; 284.61 l••t to the westerly line of said Section 35; 726.25 feet along said westerly line to the centerline 155.85 feet along •aid centerlineJ 315.63 feet •long ••id centerline; of 68 .77 feet along .said centerlin• to the northerly line said Section 35; thenc• S.89°54'21" E. l682 .30 feet along •aid northerly line to the southwesterly r1ght -ot·w•y line of the Roaring Fork R•11ro•d Holding Authority; thence along said aouthwesterly right-of-way line along a non-tangent curve to the left having a radiua of 1960.00 feet , a central angle of 20"01'23•, an arc distance of 684.96 feet, and a Long Chord ot S. 46"02 '24• B. 681.48 feet; thence S.56°03 '05• B . 324 .44 feet along ••id aouthwe•terly line to the southwesterly righ -of-way line of Colorado State Highway 82; thence S .40°48'40" B. 232 .4l feet along •aid aoutbwe•terly line; thence S .f6"55 '22• 11:. 304.80 feet along said •outbwesterly line; thence S.51°02'19• E. 111.93 teat along said southwesterly line; thence S.54°30'40" zr. 186.18 feet along said southwesterly line; thence S.55°51'4.9" B. 181.61 feet along •aid southwe•terly line' thence s .51°02 'l5" B. 90.41 feet along said sou thwesterly line to the point of beginning. Page - 25 l llllll lllll lllllll Ill lllll lllllll lllll lll lllll llll llll 692372 02/15/2006 02:51P 81772 P505 M ALSOORF 1 of 2 R 11.00 D 17.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO GENERAL WARRANTY DEED Cozy Point, L.P., a Colorado limited partnership, whose address is % B. Joseph Krabacher, Esq., Krabacher & Sanders, P .C., 201 N . Mill Street, Suite 201, Aspen, Colorado, 81611; for One Hundred Seventy Thousand Dollars ($170,000.00) and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, hereby bargains, sells and conveys to the Flora Macgregor Irrevocable Trust dated December 27, 2000, whose address is % Steven M. Marolt, Marolt & Replinger, CPA 's, 230 S. Mill Street, Aspen, Colorado 81611 an undivided six and one-half percent (6.5%) tcnant- in-common interest in and to the following real property in Garfield County, Colorado: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein Together with and equal undivided interest in and to heredi tarnents including water rights and interests, and all its appurtenances and warrants the title against al l persons, subject to taxes for 2004 and thereafter, and subject to the matters of record as of the date hereof. STATEOF C§!ora..d,p COUNTY OF e.!1./e-f SELLER: Cozy Point, L.P., a Colorado limited partnership, ByJ~-:r-~~ Darlene Friedland as Pre&ideilt ~ Cozy Point Ventures, Inc., general partner. Date: .Ju Ly 11 , 2004 The foregoing General Warranty Deed was acknowledged before me this J:i. day of Jc... It , 2004 by Darlene Friedland as President of Cozy Point Ventures, Inc., a Colfado corporation, the general partner of Cozy Point, L.P., a Colorado limited partnership . '-' Witness my hand and official seal My Commissio n Expires My Commission Expires: ______ a2113/2007 Recording requested by: Thomas J. Hartert, Esq. Balcomb & Green, P.C. PO Drawer 790 Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 (970) 945-6466 Page - 26 1111111 ·11111111111111111111111111111111 lll lllll 11111111 692372 02/15/2006 02:51P 81772 P506 M ALSDORF 2 of 2 R 11 .00 D 17 .00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRJPTION A parcel of land located in the South Half of Section 35, Townahip 6 South, Range 89 Weat of th• 6tb Principal Meridian, lying northerly and •••terly of t:b• centerline of the Roaring York River and aoutbweaterly ot t:b• Roaring Fork Railroad Holding Authority right·of·way line and Colorado State Highway 82 right-of-way line more particularly deacrlbed aa follow•: Beginning at a point on the aouthweaterly right-of-way line of Colorado State Highway 82, a rebar a.ad cap found in place, whence the aoutheaat corner o f aaid section 35, being a 3 1/4• alW11inum cap bear• s.31°33'42• E. 2015.65 feet; thence S.33"25'56" w. 331.42 feet to the centerline of the Roaring Fork River; thence the following ll coura•• along ••id centarl1ne of th• Roaring Fork River; l. N.72"23 '29" W. 2. S.87°51'31" W. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. s.8s•23•31• S.66"08'31" S.48°53'31" S.69"55'31" N.19°51'21" w. w. w. w. w. 8. N.72°04'08• W. 9. N.58'38'29" W. 10. N.33°42'29" W. ll. N .24°30'30" W. thence N.08°45'43" E. of aaid river; 116.30 feet; 342.00 feet1 342.00 feet; 517.00 feet; 332.00 feat; 363.00 feet; 181.97 faet1 394.82 feet; 198.91 feet; 445 .43 feat1 284.61 feet 126.25 feet to the weaterly line of aaid Section 35; along ••id weaterly line to the centerline thence N.31°51'14" B . 155.85 feet along aaid centerline; thence N.42°52'31" E . 315.63 feet along •aid centerline; thence N.01°55 '52• E. 68.77 teat along aaid centerline to th• northerly line of said South Halt of aaid Section 35; thence S.89°54'21• B. 1682.30 feet along aaid northerly line to the southwesterly right-of-way line of the Roaring Fork Railroad Holding Authority; thence along said southwesterly right·of-way line along a non-tangent curve to the left having a radiua of 1960.00 feet, a central angle of 20"01'23", an arc diatance of 684.96 feet, and a Long Chord of S. 46"02'24• E. 681 .48 feat; thence S.56"03'05" B. 324.44 feet along aaid southweaterly line to the aouthwestarly righ-of-way line of Colorado State .Highway 82; thence S.40°48'40" E . 232.41 feet along said soutbweatarJy line; thence S .46"55'22" E. 304 .80 feat along •aid aouthweaterly line; thence s .s1•02•19• E. 111.93 feet along said aouthweaterly line; thence S.54"30'40" E. 186.18 feet along said aouthweaterly line; thence S .55°51'49" E . 181.61 feat along aaid aout.bweaterly line' thence S.57°02'15" E. 90.41 feet along said aouthweaterly line to th• point of beginning. Page - 27 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 !57!5677 PJ2/02/2001 12: ll3P 81230 P44 " ALSDORF 1 of 3 R 1!5.90 D 13!5 .00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO Recording requested by: Thomas Harte rt, Esq. When recorde d, mail to: Thomas Hartert, Esq. 802 Grand Ave., Suite 30 3 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 GENERAL WARRANTY DEED DP ns.c.o Mamm Cr eek Properties, Inc. ("Seller "), with an address of c/o B. Joseph Krabacher, Esq., Krabacher Law Offices, 201 North Mill Street, Suit e 201, Aspen, Colorado 8 1 611, for Ten Dollars ($10.00) a nd other good and v aluabl e consideration, the receip t and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, hereby bargains, sells and conveys to Eastbank LLC, a Col orado limited liability company and whose address is 525 E. Cooper Avenue, Aspen CO 81611 all of Mamm Creek Properties, I n c. 's r ight, t itle and interest in and to the fol lowing real property in Garfield County, Colorado, consisting of a sixty percent (60%) undivided percentage interest in the following real property: SEE "EXHIBIT A"; together with all its appurtenances and warrants the title against all persons, subject to taxes for 2000 and thereafter, and sub j e ct to the matt ers set forth on "Exhibit l" a ttached hereto and made a part hereof. Date : February I~, 2000 STATE OF COLORADO COUNTY OF fuhtf~ SS. By: SELLER: CREEK INC. a Presiden t The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me February [?i, 2000 by B. Joseph Krabacher,. Pres i d e nt of~Creek Properties, Inc., a Colo rado cor poration. ~E>CPIREB My commission expires ~ W:N001 Witness my hand and official Page 1 of 3 Page - 28 I llllll lllll llllll lllll llll lllllll lllll Ill IEll llll llll !57!5677 02/02/2001 12:03P 11230 P44 " ALSDORF 1 of 3 R 1!5 .00 D 13!5.80 GARFIELD COUNTY CO Recording requested by: Thomas Harte rt, Esq. When recorde d, mail to: Thomas Harte rt, Esq. 802 Grand Ave., Suite 303 Glenwood Springs, Colorad o 81601 GENERAL WARRANTY DEED DP ns.c.o Mamm Creek Properties, Inc. {"Seller"), with an addres s of c/o B. Joseph Krabacher, Esq., Krabacher Law Offices, 201 North Mill Street, Suite 201 , Aspen, Colorado 81611, for Ten Dollars ($1 0.00) and other good and val uable consideration , the receipt a nd sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, hereby bargains , sells and conveys to Eastbank LLC, a Col orado limited lia bility company and whose address is 525 E. Cooper Avenue , Aspen CO 81611 all of Mamm Creek Properties, Inc. 's right, title and interest in and to the fol lowing real property in Garfiel d County, Colorado, consisting of a sixty percent (60%) undivided percentage i n terest in the following rea l prope rty : SEE "EXHIBIT A"; together with all its appurtenances and warrants the title against all persons, subject to taxes for 2000 and thereafter, and subject to the matters set forth on "Exhibi t l" attached hereto and made a part hereof. Date: February '~.. 2000 By: STATE OF COLORADO COUNTY OF Me.Id SS . SELLER : The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me February /?;, 2000 by B. Joseph Krabacher, President of ~Cr eek Properties, I nc., a Colorado corporation. ~E>CPIRES My commission expires ti:( .-Z001 Witness my hand and official Page 1 of 3 Page - 29 I llllll lllll llllll lllll 11111111111111111111111111111111 57!5677 02182/Zl!lel 12 :03P 8123fl P45 " ALSDORF 2 of 3 R l!l .1118 D 135.H GARFI£U> COUNTY CO Exhibit A to General Warranty Deed LE.GAL DESCRIPTION A par cel of land located in the South Half of Section 35, Townsh ip 6 South, Range 89 West of the 6th Principal Meridian , l yi ng northerly an d easterly of the centert fne of the Roarin g Fork Ri ver ond sou thwesterly of the Roaring Fork Railroad Hol ding Authority righ t -of-way llne and Col orado Stole Highway 82 right-of-way line more particularly described as follows: Beginning ot o point on the southwesterly rlght-of -woy line of Colorado State Highway 82. o rebar and cop found In p lace, whence the southeast corner of sold Section 35, being a 3 1/4" aluminum cop bears S. 37" 33' 42" E. 2075.65 feet; thence S. 33' 25' 56" W. 337.42 feet to the centerline of the Roaring Fork River; thence the following 11 couraee along said centerline of the Roaring Fork River: 1. N. 72' 23' 29" W. 716.30 feet; 2. S. 87" 57' 31 " W. 342.00 feet; 3. S. 85' 23' 31" W. 342.00 feet; 4 . S. 66' 08' 31 " W. 517.00 feet; 5 . S. 48' 53' .31• W. 332.00 feet; 6 . S. 59· 55' 3 1" W. 363.00 feet; 7 . N. 79' 51' 21" w. 181.97 feet: 8. N. 72· 04' 08" W. 394.82 feet; 9. N. SB' 38' 29" W. 198.91 feet; 10. N. 33' 42' 29" W. 445.43 feet; 11. N. 24' 30' 30• W. 284.67 feet to the westerly llne of sol d Section 35; thence N. 08' 45' 43" E. 726.25 feet along said westerly line to the centerline of so ld r iver; thence N. 37' 51' 14" E. 155.85 feet along sold centerline; thence N. 42' 52' 31" E. 315.63 feet along acid centerline; t hence N. 01' 55' 52" E. 66. 77 feet along said centerline to the northerly line of said Soutti Holt of sold Section 35; thence S. 89' 54' 21" E. 1682.30 feet along eold northerly line to the southwesterl y right-of-way !in of the Roaring Fork Railroad Holding Authority; t henctr along sold southwesterly right-of-way llne along a non-tangent curve to t he left havi ng o radius of 1960.00 feet, o central angle of 20· 01' 23'', on or e distance of 684.96 feet, and o long Chord o f S. 45· 02' 24" E. 661.48 feet; thence S. 56' OJ' 05" E. 324.44 feet along sold southwesterly line to the southwes t erl y rlgh t-of-w9: line of Colorado State Highway 82; thence S. 40' 48' 40" E. 232.41 feel along so l d southwesterl y llne; thence S 45· 55' 22" E. 304.80 feet al ong sold southwesterly line; th.,nce S. 51' 02' 19" E. 111 .93 feet" along sol d southwesterly line; thence S. 54· .30' 40" E. 166.78 feet along sold southwesterly llne; thence S. 55' 51' 49" E. 161.61 feet along eald southwesterly line; thence S. 57' 02' 15" E. 90.41 feet along sold southwesterly llne to the point of beg inning, COUNTY OF GAllFI ELD STATE OF COLORADO Page 2 of 3 Page - 30 Exhibit 1 to General Warranty Deed EXCEPTIONS The effect of inclusions in any general or specific water conservancy, fire protection, soil conservation or other district or inclusion in any water service or street improvement area. Right of the proprietor of a vein or lode to extract and remove his ore therefrom, should the same be found to penetrate or intersect the premises hereby granted, as reserved in United States Patent recorded May 20, 1899 in Book 12 at Page 508 as Reception No. 2174 6. Right of way for ditches or c anals constructed b y the authority of the United States, as reserved in United States Pat ent recorded May 20, 1899 in Book 12 at Page 508 as Recept ion No. 21746. Easements and rights of way as granted to Mountain States Telephone and Telegraph by documents recorded August 29, 1929 in Book 161 at Page 261 as Reception No, 105227, July 13, 1931 in Book 164 at Page 152 as Reception No. 110547 and October 29, 1964 in Book 361 a t Page 477 as Reception No. 227425. (Specific location not described.) Terms and conditions c ontained in the Easement for Wa t er Line recorded February 15, 1985 in Book 664 at Page 356 as Reception No. 359483. Terms and conditions contained in Resolution No. 97-92 recorded October 7, 1997 in Book 1037 at Page 381 as Reception No. 514786. Right of way for the Denver and Rio Grande Western railway. Right of way for the Roaring Fork River. Any question, d i spute or adverse claims as to any loss or gain of land as a result of any change in the river bed location by other than natural causes, or alteration through accretion, reliction, erosion or avulsion of t he center thread, bank, channel or flow of waters in the Roaring Fork River l y i ng within subject land; and any question as to the location of such center thread, bed bank or channel as a l e gal description monument or marker for purposes of describing or locating subject lands . Easements and improvements, including, but not limited to, ditches, fences, utility lines, and underground pipes, as shown on the Improvement Survey P l ant da ted September 17, 1 999 prepared by White Surveying. Deed of Trust recorded January _5_, 2000 in Book /liJ at Page Jf!3!/ as Reception No. S 571:>08' . Page 3 of 3 Page - 31 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 ·· 697252 05/05/2006 12~32P 81796 P195 " ALSDORF 1 of 3 R 16.00 D 0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO BARGAIN AM> SALE THIS DEED, made this day of_xa==r-"'03'-''-=-20~0'"''"---------' between con ronrr. T.. p .. A COLOUDO L:i:xrrJID PUTNDSJID' gnmror, whose street address is: 3925 COUHTY ROAD 154 ~Ll:llllOOD SPllZlll09 CO 81601 County of P :mcDI , Stll!e of __ .=co::!L:=OUI>O=::::...--• for the consideration of T!J! Da!lan ud od!cr nus! !!!Ill Ja1uM1c cou1mdaa • • • • • • •Dollars in band paid, hereby sells awl conveys to llllTBAn. LLC. A COLOUDO r.DaTllD Lua:rr.xn COIOAllY 0 Joint TW\lt\h. CJ TINf\tw in CClftlDOn .grlllllee, whose street address is: 1315 SAW< comrr AllHIN, CO. 81111 County of P:rn:Df· , State of _-"co"'LO=RAD=o ___ • the following legally described wari:r rights: Se• 1fatar llighte ~it 1 B-1 appurtemmt to: Signed as of the day aod yea.r first above written. State of COLOIWX> ______ County of P:rntm The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me Ibis day of •x o 3 , 2 o o 6 By B , JOSllPll J'.R'UlACBU >.Troltllrl ?JI Jl'AC'I llOR DAllLD'll W. 1'1tl:llDLAJI Witness my haDd and official seal. . / My commission expires: J.,/2jc.J / <:>( _Q~~·~·~q~l..,(l{.u.1.41d. . ..MhM'«#d'kl1i...::)~~~~~~ N~Public a \11~ r .cordld ratum ta: EAST'BAR, LLC,. A CDlOMDO L.I•tTEO UABI LJTY ms •ME c:aljllf MIU, co 51611 GIR411533 Forn 7'11 02/Dl/r/J 1.1\TEl .H Page - 32 · 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 697252 05/05/2006 12,32P 81796 P196 " ALSOORF 2 or 3 R 16 .00 D 0 .00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO DJUJIIT A A 27% undivided interest as tenancy in common to the following: A PAILCllL OP LAJIII LOO.TED Ilf TBll sovm JDU.r 01' SllC'l'XO!f ls' ~ 6 501lTB, J\AHG:I B9 IRST OF TllJI f'Zll PllDJCD'AL DJUDlAll', LYIJIQ ICOllTllJlllLY A>ll> U.Hllllt.Y 01' 1'1111 Cllll'l'DLDlll OP 'rllm 11.0All.IllG POU: ainll JIJlll 80trrallBllTDLY 01' '1'llll llOllIJ!IQ toll 11.l\ZLJIOIUI BOLDDIG AllTllOll.J:TT llGll'I' 0'11 WAY Ll'.lllB JIJlll CXlLOJlllOO STATJI Jala'llAY 12 llIQBT or WAY LDIJI llOU PAJtTICOLAJILY DSSCJl:r:JllD) AS POL LOWS' HQI!DIDIO AT A PODT DIC TBll Sotr.l'lllllr.nDY llmlT or llll.Y LDlll OP COLOllADO STA'l'I! BIGlll!lU' U, A IUlll.All Allll CU l'OOlll> Ill Pt.M:JI, ~ TBll SOU'Dlllllll'l' CODD OP SAJJJ SJICTIOX 35, lllIHG A ll/4" AL1JJIIllllM CllP BURS II 37 DllllllllJl!J 33'0" II 2075 .&5 !DI1 TllllllCS S 33 DllQIUUIS 25'56" II 337.U nft '1'0 TllJI cmmmLIKI 01' 1'111: ROAll.DIG l'OllX llrvlllll TIDDIO TBll !'OLLOllDfG J.1 COUllBllS &LOW SAXD CDl'l'RllLDlll OP ID RQAllDIQ :J'Olllt aJ:vu.s 1. !f 72 IIZCDIDS 23' 19° II 716 .JO Pllll\'1 2. S 87 DllQUJIS 57'31• lr lU.00 PDT; 1. s as DJIGKDB 23•31• "Ju.oo nrr1 4. 9 66 DIOllDll 08'31' If 517.00 l'Dit 5 . S 48 llSIDIBB 53'31• II 332.DO 1'1111'1'1 6. S 69 DJ!Clallllll 55'31" ff 363.00 .PIDT1 7. Jl 79 X!SGIRllU 81•21• ff 181.. '7 l'lllrr; 8. N ?l DllQQlllS ot•oe• "394.U PZll'r1 9 . !f 58 DJIQllDS 38'29" If l.H.91 ll'llJ:T1 io. a 33 DllCllllS u•u•" us.o rmr:r, 11. a 24 DBQIUIBS 30'30• " 28',67 PSST 1:0 TD DSTBRLT LDIJI or SAID SllCTIOX 35 1 :rnaca Jl OB D•-a 45•43• • 726.25 J'QT ALORQ SA:m llllB'rDLT LlllJI 'JO TD CDTllllLilf OP SAID :RIVD1 TIDl:llCS R 37 DIQllDS 511 1'• ll 155 .85 nrr &LOW 8llD CEMTBRLIJlll 1 IIDlllCll II 62 DSQJIUS 52 1 31• B 315 .U l'Sll'l' ALOllQ lllUD CDTSJILDl81 mlllfCZ R 01 D-.ZS 55 1 52• I '8. ?7 RllT ALOICO SA%D CllllTSRLIJlll '%0 'rllll JIOJITllllRLY LDm OP SADI aoum RALJ' OJ' llAIJ> SllCTZO!f 35' TIDIRCS S U Dllm!Dll H'21" R 1682.30 Hin' AI.OllG SAID JIOll'lUllLY LDIJI '%0 TD SOIJTJllBSTIQILY llillllT OP llAY LDlll 01' '?1111 RCIAll.lllll l'Oll llAXLJIOAD HOLDIRQ Atr.l'JIOJIITY1 'l'BllllCJI ALOMG SUD SOUTllllB&'llllRLI IUQllT or 1111'1" LID ALtlllO A llOR--C1lllV1I ro ~ LSl'I nvnm A RADIIJS OP· 1960. DO PDT, A c:mrrJtAL AlflJLS OJ' 20 DJICD.DB 01•23.' AN MC D:ts'llJlt:ll 01' 68'.'6 nrr. 1'1111 A LOltG CllOllD or 8 " DBQRUS 02'24" JI 681.U l'D'r1 TBDICS s 56 IIJIGRDS 03. os• • 32&. H nsr ALOJIQ SA%D SOIJ'rlDQS~Y LDlll TO D:S SObtBMSSTllJILT IUQBT OP lQT LIICJI OP CXlLOUDO S'l'ATS llIGIDIAY 82; 'rllllllCli 8 0 DllQllBU '8'•0• II 232 .'1 1'l!llT ALOllll Piii SOUTllllU'l'DLT t.Illll1 'l"llllKCI B 66 DSGllllBS 55 ' 22• JI 30&. 80 ll'l!lr1' ALORCI 8Am SOl!DllllB'rllllLY LDnlt TBDCJI S 51 DJIGRD:S 0211!" I 111,U RllT ALOllQ SAID SOll'l'lllllBTJmLY LI11'111 'l'lllllfCll S 54. DJIGRUB 30' 60• R lH. 7 8 ll'l!lr1' ALDJICI SAD> SOtrnlllBftllllLY LDnl1 TllllJICS S 55 DJllDIEllS Sl 1 6J• S 181.61 1'11BT ALOllQ SAID BOtnllllllll'l'llllLT Lll0:1 TlllDICll S 57 l>JIQRDS 02'15• JI 90.41 rD'r ALO>IQ SA%D SOO'l1Dn18'1'1:RLY LI1111 TO 'l:llJI POlll'l' OJ' HGDUC:MG . COlDITr OJ'~ STAft OP COLOJIADO G\124a533 Fo""" ~26. 430 El<MIB!TA1 01(17/0J Page - 33 I llllll lllll lllllll Ill 111111111111111111111111111111111 6972!52 05/05 /2006 12:32P 91796 P197 " ALSDORF 3 of 3 R 16 .00 D 0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO WATER RIGHTS EXHIBIT "B" a I 11o11agzr9 Sl95T~AN UNDIVIDED TWENTY-SEVEN PERCENT (l7"'/o) INTEREST IN AND TO ANY WATER RIGHTS, BOTllTRDUfARY AND NON· TRIBUTARY, WHETHER ADJUDICATED OR UNADJVJ>ICATED, AND ALL DITCH AND DITCH RIGHTS, WATER WELLS AND Wi:LI,. RIGHTS, STATE ENGINEER FILINGS, WELL REGISTRATION STATEMENTS AND WELL PERMITS, ADmDICATED AND VNAD.JUDICATED SPRINGS. RESERVOIRS AND RESERVOIR RIGHTS, PONDS AND POND RIGHTS, HISTORICALLY USED UPON OR APPUJl.TENANT TO THE PROPERTY, AND ALL PERSONAL PROPER.TY SUCH AS W£LL IQUIPMENT, FITI'INGS, CAsINGS AND IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT USED IN CONNECTION WITH SAID WATER RIGHTS AND WELLS. GWS248533 Page - 34 : .~ 111111111111111111111111111111111011111111111111111111 ~ ( \ S!171117 1111115/21100 12:!58P 811117 Pll81 " ALSDORF 1 ol 3 R 1!5.ee D 22!5.08 GARFIELD COUHTY CO WARRANTY DEED TIUS DEl!D, Made Ibis 4th day of January , 2000 , between JOB JAMMAJlON r. GBRAx.DINll RAB JJIMllAJ!Oli' o f the said County of GAJtYIBLD and Slate of COLORADO , aranior, and KAM CllU PROPBRTUS, IlllC. A COWRADO CORJ'OJIATION AS TO 6 0'11 INTllRBST r. COZY POINT, L . P., A COLORADO LDII'l'BD PARTNBRSHIP AS TO 40'1s INTllRll:ST. woo .. legal address is 201 MILL STRlll!T STB 201 ASPllN CO 81611 of the said County of PITXIN and Swe of COLORADO • grantee: WITN&SSETII. That the &,rantor for and in consid eratton of the sum of Ten dollar• and other good and valuable consideration DOLLARS , lhe nlteipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowlcd1ed. has granted, buaainrd. 1;;old and con¥eyed, and by these present.I doea 1ran1, bvgabt, sen. convey and confirm, unto the granfee, his heiri and auigru; forever. aU the real property together with improvements, if any, 1ituate, lyin& and being in the said County of GARPIBLD and State of Colol>do cleocribed as follows: SD BDIBIT •.a.• 1lsoknownbystn:e11ndnumber11: 3925 COtmTY RO.AD 154, GLKNWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 TOGEl'RER with all and singular me hereditamcnu and appuncnanc:c:1 thereto bcJonalng, or in anywise appert.ai.n.ina, and the reversion and reversions, remainder and remaindcn, rents, iuUCJ and profftl thereof', and an lbe emte, righ1, title. interest, claim and demand what- soever of the gnntor, either in Jaw or equity, of , in and to the above bar1ained premises, with the hereditamelltl and appun:coances . TO HA VE AND TO HOLD the said premises above bargained and dacribed, with me appurtenances:, unto the anntc:c. hi1 heirs and assigns forever. And the grantor , for himself, bis heirs. i nd personal representatives, does covenaat, gnant, bargain, imd agree to and with the grantee, bis hcin and aHigns. that al the Hme of the enSQling and delivery of lhcse pretents. he is well seized of the premises abo"le conveyed, has good , sure, perfect, absolute ind ioddeuible estate of inheritance, in law , in fee simple, aOO hu good ri.aht. fuU power and lawfu l aulllorily 10 gran1, bargain. sell and convey the same in maMer and fonn 11 aforcuid. and that the S1111C arc f= and' clear f1'1)QI all former and other gr211ts , bf.raains, sales. liens. taJtes, useummts. enc.umbnnc.es and rest:rW:tions of whatever kind or na.ture aoner, except thoae epecifie B:xception• ahown on the attached aa •BZJl'X~XT i•. The grantor shall and will WARRANI'Y AND FOREVER DEFEND lhe above-bargained pmnisca in lhe quiet and peaceable "°"""ion or the anntee. his heirs and assigns. apins1 all and every person or pmonJ lawfully claimin& lhe wllolc or aoy part tbenof. The sm,ular number 'hi.II include the plural, 1he plural the ainl(Ular. and lhc use of any gend er shall be applicable to all genden. lN WITNE.SS WHEREOF e grantor has execi.ued thii deed on the date sci forth above. ) SS. County of GAJU'l:llLD ) The forc1oing inmumeni wu acknowledged berorc me this 4th day or January • :1000 ' by JOB JAMIQRON ~ GllRALDillll RAii JAJCIQllON . w· Page - 35 SCHEDULE A Order Number: 9902!1!1ll-C2 LEGAL DESCRJP110N A parcel of land l ocated in the South Half of Section 35, Township 6 South, Range 89 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, lying northerly and easterly of the centerline o f the Roaring Fork River and southwesterly of t he Roaring For!< Railroad Holding Authority right-of-way line and Colorado State Highway 82 right-of-way line more particularl y described as follows: Beginning at a point on the southwesterly right-of-way line of Colorado State Highway 82. o rebar and cop found in p lace, whence the southeast comer of sold Section 35, lleing a 3 1/4" aluminum cap bears S. 37' 33' 42" E. 2075.65 feet; thence S. 33• 25' 56" W. 337.42 feet to the centerline of the Roaring Forl< River; th ence the following 11 courses a long said centerline of the Roaring Far!< River: 1. N. 72• 23' 29" W. 716.30 feet; 2. S. 87' 57' 31" W .. 342.00 feet; 3. s. as· 2 3' 31 " w. 342.00 feet; 4 . s. ss· 08' 31 " w. 517.00 feet; 5. S. 48. 53' 31" W. 332.00 feet; 6. S. 59· 55' 31" W. 363.00 feet; 7 . N. 79• 51' 21" W. 181.97 feet; 8. N. 72' 04' oa• W. 394.82 feet; 9. N. 58. 38' 29" W. 198.91 feet; 10. N . .33" 42' 29" W. 445.43 feet; 11 . N. 24" 30' 30" W. 284.67 feet to the westerly fine of said Section .35; thence N. oa· 45' 43" E. 726.25 feet along said westerl y fine to the centerline of said river; thence N. 37' 51' 14" E. 155.85 feet along said centerline; thence N. 42' 52' 31" E. 315.63 feet along said centertlne; thence N. 01· 55' 52" E. 68. 77 feet along said centerline to the northerly line of said South Half o f said Section 35; th ence S. 89' 54' 2 1" E. 1682.30 feet along said northerl y line to the southwesterly r ight-of-way lin of the Roaring Fork Railroad Holding Authority: thence along said southwesterly right-of-way line along a non-tangent curve to the left having o radius of 1960.00 feet, a central angle of 20· 01' 23", an arc di st ance of 684.96 feet. and o Long Chord of S. 46' 02' 24" E. 681.48 feet; thence S. 55· 03' 05" E. 324.44 feet along said southwesterly line to the southwesterly right-of-we: line of Colorado State Highway 82; thence S. 40' 48' 40" E. 2 32.41 feet along said southwesterly line; thence S 46" 55' 22" E. 304.80 feet along sold southwesterly line; thence S. 51' 02' 19" E. 111.93 feet along said southwesterly line; thence S. 54· 30' 40" E. 186.78 f eet along sold southwesterly line; then ce S. 55· 5 1' 49" E. 181.61 fee t alon g said southwesterly line; thence S. 57' 02' 15" E. 90.41 feet along sold southwester!>: line to the point of beginning, COUNTY OF GARFIELD STATE OF COLORADO I llllll 1111111111111111111111111111111 w 1111111111111 5571117 lll/fl!S/28111l 02: !II" 11117 Pl82 " ALSDOllF 2 of 3 R 1!1 .1111 D 229.80 GARFIE\..ll COUNTY CO Page - 36 - 1111111111111111111\111111111111111111111111111 !!I !5!57887 et/09/28111 112:!581' .!!!~~~OU::J" co 3 of 3 R 15.l!le D 22!5 _.ee_~-~===========;i EXHIBIT! 99029911 EXCEPI'IONS Pile ll'lmber 1 The effect of i nclusions in any general or specific water conservancy, fire protection, soil conservation or other district or inclusion in any water service or street i mprovement area . Right o! the proprieto r of a vein or lode to extract and remove his ore therefrom , should the same be found to penetrate o r intersect the premises hereby granted, as reserved i n United States Patent record ed May 20, 1899 in Book 12 at Page 508 as Reception No. 21746. Righ t o f way for ditches or canals construc ted by the authority of the United States, as reserved in United States Patent recorded May 20, 1899 in Book 12 at Page 508 as Reception No. 21746 . Easements anq r ights o f way as granted to Mountain States Telephone and Telegraph by documents r ecorded August 29, 1929 in Book 161 at Page 261 as Re ception No. 105227, July 13 , 1931 in Book 164 at Page 152 as Reception No . 110547 and October 29, 1964 in Book 361 at Page 477 as Re c eption No . 227425 . (Specific location n ot described) Terms and conditions contained in the Easement for Water Line recorded February 1 5, 1985 in Boo k 664 a t Page 356 as Reception No. 359483. Terms and conditions contained in Reoolution No. 97-92 recorded October 7. 1997 in Book 1037 at Page 381 as Reception No . 514786. Right of way fo r the Denver a nd Rio Grande Western railway. Right of wa y f or the Roaring Fork Ri ver. Any question, dispute or adverse c l aims as t o any l oss or gain of land as a r esult of any c hange in the river bed locati on by other t han natural causes , or a lteration through accr etion, reliction, erosion or avulsion of the cent~r thread, bank, c harmel or flow of waters i n the Roaring Fork River lying within subj ect land; and any question as to the l ocation of such center thread, bed , bank or channel as a legal description monument or marker for purposes of desc ribing or l ocating subject lands . Easements and i mprovements, inc luding, but not limi ted to, ditches , fences, uti l i t y l ines , and underground pipes, as sho wn o n the Improvement Survey Plat dated September 1 7, 1 999 prepared by Whi t e Surveying. Page - 37 Leases Encumbering the Property There are two leases that encumber the property; Gould Construction and InterMountain Environmental Services. Each of these leaseholders has signed a letter of consent and these are included below. See attached letters from Gould Construction and InterMountain Environmental Services. Page - 38 ~untain ENVlRONMENTA~ SEfM CES April 9, 2015 Garueld Cou nty Comm unity Developmen t Department /\un: Mr. David Pcsn ichak Plann in g Ma nage r I 08 811' S tree t, #40 I Glenwood Sp rin gs, CO 8160 1 Dear Cou nt y Pl ann in g Department : P0Box3336 Glenwood Sp<ing s, CO 3 1602 (970) 945-2822 -Office (970) 963-5993 -Fax www.lnl\vas1e.co1n You arc hereby notified th at ln tcrmou nt ain Enviro nmental Services, as a com mercial tenant of certain la nd area located on Garfield Cou nty Road 154 within Parcel 2A of the Eastbank Parcel 2 Lot Sp lit as recorded, does hereby conse nt to the pro 1>e 11y owners' fi ling of an applicat ion for th e Eastbank, LLC Minor S ubdiv ision . Very truly yours, Na n~ L-;at~~~~ Title: Pres ident 3927 County Road 154 -Glenwood Springs, CO -81601 Page - 39 Property Ownership The subject property is 38.2-acres and it is owned by the following entities as tenants-in-common: EASTBANK, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, the ELIZABETH MACGREGOR IRREVOCABLE TRUST DATED DECEMBER 27, 2000, a Colorado trust, and the FLORA MACGREGOR IRREVOCABLE TRUST DATED DECEMBER 27, 2000, a Colorado trust each as to an undivided interest. Chain of Title Summary Fee simple to the subject property is owned by Eastbank, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, as to an undivided 87% interest; Elizabeth Macgregor Irrevocable Trust dated December 27, 2000, as to an undivided 6.5% interest; and Flora Macgregor Irrevocable Trust dated December 27, 2000, as to an undivided 6.5% interest. Title was acquired by: (1) Warranty Deed dated January 4, 2000, recorded in the records of Garfield County, Colorado as Sequence No. 557607, Joe Jammaron and Geraldine Rae Jammaron as grantor conveyed title to the subject property to Mamm Creek Properties, Inc., a Colorado corporation, as to an undivided 60% interest and Cozy Point, L.P., a Colorado limited partnership, as to an undivided 40% interest; (2) General Warranty Deed dated February 18, 2000, recorded in the records of Garfield County, Colorado as Sequence No. 575677, Mamm Creek Properties, Inc. as grantor conveyed title to an undivided 60% interest in the subject property to Eastbank, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company; (3) General Warranty Deed dated July 19, 2004, recorded in the records of Garfield County, Colorado, as Sequence No. 692372, Cozy Point, L.P., a Colorado limited partnership, as grantor, conveyed title to an undivided 6.5% interest in the subject property to the Flora Macgregor Irrevocable Trust dated December 27, 2000; (4) General Warranty Deed dated July 19, 2004 recorded in the records of Garfield County, Colorado, as Sequence No. 672373, Cozy Point, L.P., a Colorado limited partnership, as grantor, conveyed title to an undivided 6.5% interest in the subject property to the Elizabeth Macgregor Irrevocable Trust dated December 27, 2000; and (5) by Warranty Deed dated May 3, 2006, recorded in the records of Garfield County, Colorado, as Sequence No. 697251, Cozy Point, L.P., a Colorado limited partnership, as grantor, conveyed an undivided 27% interest in the subject property to Eastbank, L.L.C., a Colorado limited liability company. Page - 40 Mineral Ownership The applicant has reviewed the records at the Garfield County Assessor’s Office and at the Garfield County Clerk & Recorder’s office and based on the records reviewed, the surface owners are also the mineral owners. The letter below states that based on a review of the title commitment, the minerals have not been severed. The mineral owners or lessees are noted on the Minor Subdivision Plat. Page - 41 Certificate of Taxes Due Account Number R083020 Parcel 218535304001 Assessed To GARFIELD COUNTY TREASURER Certificate of Taxes Due Certificate N umber 2015-00062 Acres 38.20 Order Number 51280 Vendor ID Advanced Title Company EASTBANK LLC 710EDURANT AVE STE W6 ASPEN, CO 81611 622 Rood Ave., Grand Junction, CO 81501 Legal DHoriptiou Silu1 Addrn1 Quarter: SW Section: 35 To"1!ship: 6 Range: 89 Subdivision: EASTBANK PARCEL 2 L OT SPLIT PARCEL 2A. PLAT REC#813402 Year Tu; Fee1 Tu;Ch e 2014 $3 009.36 $0.00 $0.00 T otal Tax Char e Clnmd Total Due 11 ofOl/1'1201' Tax B ill ed at 2014 Rates for Tax Area 006 -I G-MF -006 Authority Mill Levy Amount Value• GARFIELD COUNTY 8.9050000 $373 .82 SPEC.PURPOSE- GARFIELD COUNTY • ROAD & B 3.5000000 $146.93 LAND GARFIELD COUNTY -SOCIAL SE 1.2500000 $52.47 SPEC.PURPOSE- IMPROVEMENTS GLENWOOD & RURAL FIRE 10.5880000* $444.49 IRRIGATED LAND- BASALT WATER CONSER 0.0440000 $1.85 AGRICLTRL. COLO RIVER WATER CONS 0.2530000 $10.62 GRAZING LAND- SCHOOL DISTRICT RE-I 42.1490000 $1,769.41 AGRICULTURAL COLORADO MTN COLLEGE 3.9970000 $167.79 T otal GARFIELD COUNTY PUBLIC LIBR 1.0000000 $41.98 Taxes Billed 2014 71.6860000 $3,009.36 * Credit Levy Paymeatl $0.00 Adual $50,000 $92,770 $1 ,440 $540 $144,75 0 Bahmoe $3 009.36 $3 ,009.3 6 $3,009.36 As1011ed $1 4 ,500 $26,900 $420 $160 $41,980 All T ax Lien Sale amounts are subject to change due to endorsement of current tax es by the lienh older or to advertising and distraint warrant fees. Changes may occur and th e Treasu rer's Office will need to be con t act ed prior to remittance after the following dates: Person al Property and Mobil e Homes -September 1, 2014, Real Property -Sept ember 1, 2014. TAX LIEN SALE REDEMPTION A MOUN TS MU ST BE PAID BY CASH OR CASHIERS CHE CK. Special taxin g distri cts and th e boundaries of such districts may be on file with th e Board of Cou nty Commissioners , th e Cou nty Clerk, or th e County Assessor. This certifi cate does not in clude l and or improvements assessed under a separate account number, personal property taxes , transfer tax or misc . tax coll ected on behalf of other entities , special or local improvement district assessments or mobile homes, unless specifically mentioned. I, the undersigned , do hereby certify that the entire amount of taxes due upon the above described parcels of real property and all outstandi n g sales for unpaid t axes as shown by th e records in my office from w hich th e same may still be redeem ed with th e amou nt req uired for redemption are as noted herein. In witness whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal. HCASURCR, GAIHIElO COUNTY KARLAJ BAGLEY Jan 15, 2015 2:05:02 PM JO'Jll"'::itrMt,Su•tt'2G4 Glenwood Springs CO, 81601 Pag e 1 of 1 Page - 42 Property Legal Description LEGAL DESCRIPTION A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE SOUTH HALF OF SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 89 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, LYING NORTHERLY OF THE CENTERLINE OF THE ROARING FORK RIVER AND SOUTHWESTERLY OF THE ROARING FORK TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY RIGHT-OF-WAY AND COLORADO STATE HIGHWAY 82 RIGHT-OF-WAY, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE SOUTHWESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF COLORADO STATE HIGHWAY 82, A REBAR AND CAP FOUND IN PLACE, (WHENCE THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 35, BEING A 3 1/4" ALUMINUM CAP, BEARS S37°44'52"E A DISTANCE OF 2075.65 FEET); THENCE DEPARTING SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY S33°14'47"W A DISTANCE OF 381.32 FEET TO A POINT IN THE CENTERLINE OF THE ROARING FORK RIVER; THENCE THE FOLLOWING THREE (3) COURSES ALONG SAID CENTERLINE OF THE ROARING FORK RIVER; 1. N72°34'38"W A DISTANCE OF 806.63 FEET; 2. S87°46'22"W A DISTANCE OF 351.38 FEET; 3. S85°12'22"W A DISTANCE OF 170.00 FEET; THENCE DEPARTING SAID CENTERLINE N04°47'38"W A DISTANCE OF 125.00 FEET; THENCE S77°03'06"W A DISTANCE OF 249.82 FEET; THENCE S53°45'59"W A DISTANCE OF 39.00 FEET; THENCE S00°00'00"E A DISTANCE OF 22.42 FEET; THENCE S71°38'40"W A DISTANCE OF 82.76 FEET; THENCE ALONG A TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 745.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 14°25'06", A DISTANCE OF 187.48 FEET (CHORDS BEARS S64°26'07"W A DISTANCE OF 186.98 FEET); THENCE S57°13'34"W A DISTANCE OF 178.94 FEET; THENCE S78°47'49"W A DISTANCE OF 226.84 FEET; THENCE N76°50'20"W A DISTANCE OF 398.56 FEET; THENCE ALONG A NON-TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 1517.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 07°17'55", A DISTANCE OF 193.24 FEET (CHORD BEARS N05°46'21"W A DISTANCE OF 193.11 FEET); THENCE N02°07'30"W A DISTANCE OF 93.94 FEET; THENCE N06°53'56"W A DISTANCE OF 199.65 FEET; THENCE ALONG A TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 636.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 08°35'56" (CHORD BEARS N12°10'22"W A DISTANCE OF 95.36 FEET); THENCE N16°28'12"W A DISTANCE OF 90.17 FEET; THENCE ALONG A TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 300.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 20°08'57", A DISTANCE OF 105.50 FEET (CHORD BEARS N24°44'53"W A DISTANCE OF 104.96 FEET); THENCE N07°31'07"W A DISTANCE OF 197.63 FEET; THENCE N48°20'56"E A DISTANCE OF 78.22 FEET; THENCE N27°54'09"E A DISTANCE OF 156.25 FEET; THENCE N00°54'54"W A DISTANCE OF 126.04 FEET; THENCE N20°21'21"E A DISTANCE OF 133.39 FEET; THENCE N13°30'20"E A DISTANCE OF 86.17 FEET; THENCE N49°27'26"E A DISTANCE OF 184.75 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF THE SOUTH HALF OF SAID SECTION 35; THENCE DEPARTING SAID NORTHERLY BOUNDARY S00°07'44"E A DISTANCE OF 647.26 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 650.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 130°10'09", A DISTANCE OF 1476.72 FEET, (CHORD BEARS S65°12'49"E A DISTANCE OF 1179.01 FEET); THENCE N49°42'07"E A DISTANCE OF 278.53 FEET; THENCE N49°54'08"W A DISTANCE OF 104.24 FEET; THENCE N46°10'38"E A DISTANCE OF 532.58 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHWESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF THE ROARING FORK TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY S56°20'25"E A DISTANCE OF 227.36 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHWESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF COLORADO STATE HIGHWAY 82; THENCE THE FOLLOWING SIX (6) COURSES ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF COLORADO STATE HIGHWAY 82: 1. S40°59'49"E A DISTANCE OF 230.22 FEET; 2. S47°06'31"E A DISTANCE OF 304.80 FEET; Page - 43 3. S51°13'28"E A DISTANCE OF 111.93 FEET; 4. S54°41'49"E A DISTANCE OF 186.78 FEET; 5. S56°02'59"E A DISTANCE OF 181.61 FEET; 6. S57°13'24"E A DISTANCE OF 90.41 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, SAID PARCEL OF LAND CONTAINING 38.20 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. Page - 44 Statement of Ownership and Authorization EASTBANK, LLC FLORA MACGREGOR IRREVOCABLE TRUST ELIZABETH MACGREGOR IRREVOCABLE TRUST February 1, 2015 c/o Dunrene Management, Inc. 710 East Durant Avenue, Suite W-6 Aspen, CO 81611 (tel.) (970) 925-9046 (fax) (970) 925-1162 Garfield County Planning Department Attn: Mr. David Pesnichak 108 Eighth Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Dear Sir: The undersigned are all of the co-tenant/tenant-in-common fee title owners of that certain real property located in Garfield County, Colorado, legally described as Parcel 2A according to that certain Eastbank Parcel 2 Lot Split Plat filed for recording in the offices of the Garfield County Clerk and Recorder on January 18, 2012 as Reception No. 813402. By this letter, effective as of February 1, 2015, regardless of the date of actual execution, the undersigned hereby confirm that Robert Duncan Macgregor, individually and as Manager of Dunrene Management, Inc., a Colorado corporation, and the President of Eastbank, LLC, is authorized to: (i) execute (as "Applicant" or "Owner"), submit, file, process and pursue land use applications, and (ii) may, in connection therewith, negotiate the terms and conditions of related matters such as fee agreements, special use permits, or other applications, consents, permits and documents or instruments that may be required by Garfield County, Colorado, with respect to the Property. As the Authorized Representative and Agent of the undersigned for the purposes hereof, Mr. Macgregor may also delegate such authority to the instant lessee/developer and or its planner, to-wit: KW Glenwood Springs, LLC and Davis Farrar of Western Slope Consulting, respectively; as well as other related consultants and representatives. Any final agreement(s), plat(s) or recording instruments shall require the execution of the fee title owner of the Property at that time. Should you require any additional inform'ation or confirmation, please feel free to contact the attorney for the undersigned, Thomas J. Hartert, at Balcomb & Green, P.C. Very truly yours, EASTBANK, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company By its Manager, Dunrene Management, Inc., a Colorado Page - 45 Page - 46 Statements of Authority cG Garfield Co unty STATEMENT OF AUTHORITY Pursuant to C.R.S. §38-30·172, the undersigned executes this Statement of Authority on behalf of KW Glenwood Sp!lngs, lLC a n Arizona llmftad liablllty oompany (corporation, l imited l iability company, general partnership, registered limited liability partnership, registered limited liability limited partnership, limited partnership association, government agency, trust or other), an entity other than an individual, capable of holding title to real property (the "Entity"), and states as follows: The name of the Entity is _KW_G_l•_n_wood __ s""p_rings-"-._L_Lc ___________________ __, and is formed under the laws of _Ariz_._on_a ______________________ _ The mailing address for the Entity is _P_.o_._e_ox_s_1-'s._T_a1_1u_rid_e_. c_o_s_1_435 ______________ _ The name and/or position of the person authorized to execute instruments conveying, encumbering, or otherwise affecting title to real property on beha If of the Entity is Kevin M. Kleman, Manager or Four Pine, u.c. Member of KMK FX, LLC, Manager of KW Glenwood Springs, LLC The limitations upon the authority of the person named above or holding the position described above to bind the Entity are as follows (if no limitations, insert "None"): _N_on_e ___________ _ Other matters concerning the manner in which the Ent ity deals with any interest in real property are (if no other matter, leave this section blank):---------------------- Signature:_\_-+--------+------- Name (printed): r-----'---"-------- Title (if any): _M_•---------------- STATE OF _Ari_·z_on_a _____ ) )SS. COUNTY OF _P_im_a _____ _,) The foregoing Instrument was acknowledged before me this ~5 ~ay of K.bf"W).C ¥ , 20 \ S- by Kevin M. Kleman, Manager of Four Pino, LLC, • cPJ<belqell of KW Glenwood Sptlngs, LLC an Arizona llmlt ad llabllity company •Member of KMK FX, Manager Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expir es: \ \-)1.;=t (Date) LEE ANN WILSON N otary Public • Arizona Pima Count~SEA L) M y Commission Ei<pl rea November 20. 2017 Uulk: (Notary Public) Page - 47 Statem ent of A uthority (C.R.S . § 38-30-172) l. This Statement of Authority relates to an entity1 named; EASTBANJ(, {,LC 2. The type of entity is a: D Corporation D Non-profit Corporation Cg) Limited liability company 0 Genera l partnership 0 Limited partnership 0 Registered limited liability partnership 0 Regi stered limited li ab ility limited partnership 0 Limited partnership association 0 Government or governmental su bdivision or agency 3. The entity is formed under the laws of S ta te of Color ado. 4. The moiling address of the entity is: 710 Eust D u rant Aven ue, Unit W-61 Alipen, Color ado 8 1611. 5. The !ID name and [El position of each person auLhorized to execute instruments conveying, encumbering, or otherwi se affecting tit le to real property on behalf of the entity is: Robert Duncan Macgregor, P resjd eot ol D u n r ene Management, Inc., a Colo rado c orporation , Ma nage r of Eastban k, LLC. 6. 2The authority of the foregoing persoo(s) to bind the entity is IID not limited 0 limited as follows: N/A 7. Other matters concerning the manner in which the entity deals with interests in real property: NIA 8. 3This Statement of Authority is executed on behalf of the entity pursuant to the provisions ofC.R.S. § 38-30-172. 9. Tus Statement of Authority amends and supercedes in all respects any prior Statement of Authority executed on behalf of the en9 · Executed this l 2'h day of January 2012. / By:~-++---r-~~~~~~~ ST A TE OF COLORADO P1TK.1N CO UNTY OF~ ) )ss ) The foregoing instrumenr was acknowledged before me this 12th day of January 2012 by Robert Dwican Macgregor, President of Dunrene Management, lnc., a Colorado corporation, Manager of Eastbank, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company. Witness my hand and official seal. Ir!!!!!!~~=~===~ My Commission expires: ~ 2-3/~15. ~fA1itBJ P~itrr~ V!1.o STATE OF COLORADO blic 1 This foon should not be used unless the entity is capable of holding title to real property. 2 The absence of any llmilalion shall be prims facf9 evide nce that no such llmltatlon exists, ~ The statement of authority must be recorded to obtain the benefits of the statute. • Strike if not appllcable. To""-1. ~ r--k.r + C . lssion Exo!res 07/2312015 {Sa /tJJM-~ " ~reen ,1 f P. {) · !Jo fl l)tto, CD ?I 6 o I C /snvJ~o:R 5j°f1 llJ-'' Page - 48 1111 ~·11-• f:i'M''-'l,r-fW.l~1r ~.lr~~llflfll~:MC/~U ~1 ~ 11111 ReceptJon~; 770439 06/30/2009 0~ 24 07 PM Je•n Alberico I cl 1 ~•c Fae ~6 00 Doc Fee 0 CO GARFIELD COUNlY CO II l l llll Ill l II I llllllll II I II II I Ill S tatement of Authori ty (Section 38-30-172, C.R.S.) I. This S 1ar~meru of Au1honty rl'liltes 10 an entity nJmPd ELJZABETlJ MACGREGOR IRREVOCA BI .E TRUSl DATFD OECEMBEn 27, LOOO 2, ThCl 1ypC' ol L'nliry 1 ~ a TH UST 3, The enr lry Is formed under the laws of COLORADO J"he ma1hng Jdd rt!~~ tor till' entity is: P .O. BOX \0671 AS PEN, CO 8l 6J2 s "Ille nam~ or pos111on or l'ac-h pH50n authorized to execute 1nstrumeru~ conwytng, encun1llcnng, o· otherwise affec·rmg 111l e to real propmy on b~half of the emuy b . STEVEN M. MAROLT, TRUSTEE ti. llk .lUlhOl'lly O[ the foregoing \)~rson(~) 10 b11)d the entity \S limited as follows: NII\ 7 ntb ~t,ttement of Amhorl ty IS execme<l Oil behalf or the t'lllity pursuam (0 the pro v1s1ons of Smion 38-30-172, C.R.S 8 Tiu~ stan>rne m or Aurhority ame nds and supercedes mall respeets any pnor Statement of AL1thnrirv executt!d on ll~hatr of tht! enury. S1rm·orco1..0Rf){)D ) )ss County of GARFIELD ) Till' 1ore omg Instrument \"as adcnow ged before me on June 29 , 2009 by STEVEN M. MAROLT (" 1"'1J I 111 137% O!il.:.'OOR IFll\I ~1 111 Odl STEVEN M. MAROLT P .O. BOX l 067J ASPEN, CO 8 16 12 GC63003R02 (8230041} JANICE L JOHNSON NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF COLORADO Page - 49 II I I 111111111111111111111 11 1111111 S t a tem ent ot Authority (Sect ion 38-30-172, C.RS.) I. nus Sr,nemem or Aurhomy relate~ to an enti ty named FLORA MACGREGOR mR EVOCA BLE TRUST DATED DECEMBER 27, 2000 1 The type ot entity 1s a TRUST 3 Thl' entity Is iormed under the l.1ws of COLORADO 11 . The mail11111 address tor the emity is. P .O . BOX 10671 ASP I!N, CO 11161 2 s rhe name or posi11011 of t!.ich person authoriud to executl' in~rrumcm~ conveying, enrnmbenng, or othe n' 1se affeomg ntlr to real propeny on behalf of thr 1•m1ty ts: STEVEN M. MAllOLT, TRUSTEE 6 The .iut l1on11uf1lw 1orf.'goi11g µerson(~) 10 bind the Cntltj 1s li m 1 1~cl a~ follo w~: NIA 7. This stutcmenr of Allfhorlry Is execurec l on behal f of th e t'ntity pursuant to the provi ~ia11 ~ of Secr 1011 38-J0 -172, C R S, U This s1a1eme 111 ol Authonty 11rnends and sup ercede~ in all respects any prior Sratemem of A111horlry exetu100 on behal[ of rile ~muy st~u· ur co J...o /Ut {JV Co1J1ty of GARFIELD Not.1 My W l1t'11 !{~corded R1•11 1m 111 ) )55 ) 1owledged before me on Ju ne 29, 2009 by STEVEN M . l\Li\R OL T STEVEN M . MAROLT P.O. BOX 1067 1 ASPEN, CO 81612 GC6J003002 {02:10 040) r .JA NI CE L JOHNSON NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF COLORADO Page - 50 Slatemcnl Dr A ul ltority (C.R.S. § 3&·30-172) I. Thi s Sta tement of Authority re lates lo nn entity' nam ed : DUNllE1"iE MANAGEMENT, INC. 2. The type of l!lllily is a: ~ Corporation D Non-profit Co rporat!on a l .i111itcd liability company 0 General pnrtnr.:rshl11 0 l,i mitcd partnership 0 Regi ste red l imited li ability partn ership Q Registered limiled liabi li ty lim ited panncrship 0 Limited partners hip associ:itlon 0 Govemmcnl or governmenta l su bd ivision or agency 3. The enti ty is fonned under the laws of Stute of Cul or lldo . 4. The mailing address of t:he enli ty is : 7 10 Eul D uruni Aven ue, Unit W-6, Aspen , Co lor au o R16J J . 5. The 00 name a11 d 00 position of the person authorized to r.:xecute instrument s conveyi ng, enc umbering, or otherwise affecting title lo real propeny on behalf of the en tity iii : Robert Du ncll n Mncg r cgo r , Prc.s idcnl uf Ounrcn e Mana gement , Inc., n Co lorado corporation. 6. ~Tho authorit y of th e foregoing perwn(s) lo bi.ad lbe entity is l8J not limited 0 limited as follow~: NI A 7 0 1h1:r matters concerning the manner in wh ich the co.Lily deals wit h interests in n.:ul property : NI A 8. lThi s Sta1emel\I of Autho rity is executed on behalf or 1hc enti ty pursuanl to the provisions of C.R.S. §.38-30-172. 9. 4 This S1utemenl or Aul hority amends and s uperccdes in all respects any pri or Su1tement of A uLhoril y executed on behalf of thee tity. J::xecuted thi s 29 111 day of February 2009. By: I SJ'A TL OF COLORAJJO ) )ss COUNTY OF GARHELD ) Rob V\_ The fo r1:goi11g instrwm:nl was ucknowlcdg,ed before me this ____;;:/__ da y uf Jun e 1009 by Robert D11ncan Macgrego r, Presidenl of Dunrene lanagemem , Inc , a Colorado corporation . Wilness 111 y hand and offi cial sc:a l My Co rnrnis s io11 r:x . ir~ · l JA NICE LJOHNSON NOTARY PUBUC STATE O~O..flAD~. , u~ °Cornrn,•·~11;"' E •P1'§:; ' 12 Th l~norm snO.u 1d no t De used unless the enllty Is ca pable of hold ing title to rea l property. 1 Tl'ta absence of any li mitation shall be prfma facie ev idence that no such lim itation ex ists 1 Tne statement of authority must be recorded 10 obtain the be nelils of the sxitule .~ 4 Strikelfnol app!icable ~4v.r" i • ! ~bet1 (Y}q~i 'P1or f'}fO C'd~i· 'J).11-__-/ _,py~ tJ. (J)--,6 /lytt.11, to 'i'/611 Page - 51 Letter of Authorization EASTBANK, LL C Mr. Dav id Pcs nichak Garfield Co unty Com munil.)1 De velopme nt I 08 8th Street. Suite 40 I Glenwood Springs. CO 8160 I Dear Mr . Pesaichak : Fehruary 27 . 2015 As 1he auth orized repre se nta ti ve of Castb an h.. LLC. I am wo rkin g wi t h a developrm:nl team lh at is purs uing Minor Subdivision and Major Im pact Rcvit:w applications for three lots and construcli on of a Federa l Express faci lit y proposed to be bui lt on the property located adjacent to CR 154 identifi ed as Parcel No. 2 185-353-04-00 I , I hereb)' co nse nt to and auth ori ze th e processing of the Maj or Impact Review Application and Min or Subdivision Applica 1i ons before the Ga rfield Cou nty Colorado Planning Co mmi ss ion and Boa rd of Commi ss ioner s: Further. I aul hori.le Davis Famtr of Western S lope Co ns ulting. Ca rb onda le, Co lorado, David McCo naughy of Ga rfi e ld and Hech1 PC, G le nw ood prings, Col<.i rad o. Kevin Kiernan o f KW Glenv.ood Springs, LLC a nd Roge r Neal, High Country Engineering. Glenwood Spring:., Co lorado to serve as my rep resentat ives for purposes of processing these application~ befo re Garfield Co un t), CO. Yours Prc~1Jc11 Durcne i\Ltnagcmcnt, Inc.; .\l.lffi1~e1 11f F.1>1lnnk.. Ll.C .inJ \ml oa'led Rcprc~e111.111 ve for rhc \uthorucJ Trus1~ 710 E A S T DURANT AVE ·ASP EN. COLORADO ·8 1611 Page - 52 Names and Addresses of All Property Owners within 200 Ft. Adjoining Property Owners 200 Feet from Property Boundaries Information Obtained from Garfield County Assessor's Records 4/17/15 PARCEL# NAME ADDRESS2 CITY STATE ZIPCODE 218536313001 NEILEY, RICHARD Y JR & MANISCALCHI, MARIA E 6800 HWY 82 UNIT 1 GLENWOOD SPRINGS CO 81601 218535301033 GOULD, MARK C & MARY A 200 OAK LANE GLENWOOD SPRINGS CO 81601 218535301021 BISHOP, JOHN M & TAKEMOTOT, SUSAN & HAUMANN, ROBERT 626 CASCADE AVE BOULDER CO 80302 218535400025 SHANE & BRUCE'S LTD. LIABILITY CO 4185 COUNTY ROAD 154 GLENWOOD SPRINGS CO 81601 218536313002 COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES FOB DIVISION OF PARKS AND WILDLIFE AND PARKS AND WILDLIFE COMMISSION 1313 SHERMAN STREET DENVER CO 80203 218536300013 ROARING FORK TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY 530 E MAIN STREET ASPEN CO 81611 218535301034 WESTBANK RANCH HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION PO BOX 2703 GLENWOOD SPRINGS CO 81601 218535423007 BLUE HERON PROPERTIES LLC 1007 WESTBANK ROAD GLENWOOD SPRINGS CO 81601 218534402008 HENKE PROPERTY LLC c/o CARL B LINNIECKE 215 S MONARCH #101 ASPEN CO 81611 218535400024 SHANE & BRUCE'S LLC 4185 COUNTY ROAD 154 GLENWOOD SPRINGS CO 81601 218535400017 ROSE, JAMES L. PO BOX 432 RIFLE CO 81650-0432 218535304001 EASTBANK LLC c/o MACGREGOR, FLORA IRREVOCABLE TRUST 710 E DURANT AVE STE W6 ASPEN CO 81611 218535304002 MACGREGOR, ROBERT DUNCAN 710 EAST DURANT AVENUE UNIT W-6 ASPEN CO 81611 218534402007 KBH LLC 1502 DORCHESTER DR OKLAHOMA CITY OK 73120 218534402004 ROARING FORK LAND NO 4, LLC c/o NORMAN J BENFORD 333 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS, SUITE 4400 MIAMI FL 33131 Page - 53 218535200015 WAREHOUSE INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP 1111 DUNN AVENUE CHEYENNE WY 82001 218534102003 ROARING FORK PURCHASE TRUST c/o LONGFELLOW MANAGEMENT PO BOX 380199 CAMBRIDGE MA 2238 218535200022 JAMMARON, KENNETH V. & KAREN A. 4913 HWY 82 GLENWOOD SPRINGS CO 81601 218535200023 L & Y JAMMARON FAMILY LLLP 4915 HIGHWAY 82 GLENWOOD SPRINGS CO 81601-9622 218535200021 JAMMARON, GLEN L. & LYNNE 4909 HIGHWAY 82 GLENWOOD SPRINGS CO 81601 218534402006 ROARING FORK LAND NO. 6 LLC c/o NORM BENFORD 333 SE 2ND AVE #4400 MIAMI FL 33131 218535200058 JACKSON, CARTER T. & LOUISE VAN K. PO BOX 27 GLENWOOD SPRINGS CO 81602-0027 218535300060 ROARING FORK RE-1 SCHOOL DISTRICT 1521 GRAND AVE GLENWOOD SPRINGS CO 81601 218535400059 ROARING FORK TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY 530 E MAIN STREET ASPEN CO 81611 218527400057 LAZY H SLASH ELEVEN LLC PO BOX 27 GLENWOOD SPRINGS CO 81602-0027 218526200030 ROARING FORK TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY 530 E MAIN STREET ASPEN CO 81611 Page - 54 Map of Subject Parcel and Adjacent Property Owners Subject Property N Subject Property Page - 55 Project Narrative This application is a request for review of a Major Impact Review for a Federal Express Warehouse and Distribution Center in the Rural Zone District on the parcel owned by Eastbank, LLC, the Elizabeth Macgregor Irrevocable Trust dated December 27, 2000, a Colorado trust, and the Flora Macgregor Irrevocable Trust dated December 27, 2000. As the County is aware, in September 2014 Commissioners Resolution 2014-50 approved essentially the same Warehouse and Distribution Center that is described in this application, adjacent to the Glenwood Springs Airport. That approval required the applicant to work with the city of Glenwood Springs on two conditions concerning a financial contribution for road improvements and land dedication for the South Bridge landing. During the process of negotiations with Glenwood, the applicant found the current alternative project location south of Glenwood Springs immediately west of the Highway 82/County Road 154 intersection. After the proposed site was identified, the applicant met with the city of Glenwood Springs’ staff and Mayor to present the new location and requested initial feedback on the site. The City representatives offered comments, but were generally pleased to see the new project location away from the Glenwood Springs Airport and where there were no impacts to the city streets. This submittal represents a request to Garfield County for approval of the site described herein. The applicant is simultaneously seeking administrative review of a Minor Subdivision to create three lots and the FedEx ground facility will be located on one of the three lots. This Federal Express facility is urgently needed to meet increasing demands for shipping services in eastern Garfield County. The demand for shipping services has been increasing and will continue to increase as e-commerce expands in the in the region and the country as a whole. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. (FedEx Ground) scouted Glenwood Springs and surrounding areas for strategically viable sites and as noted above, is pursuing a location in the southerly portion of the Glenwood Springs Urban Growth Area. The facility is designed as an inward oriented operation with the majority of its business related activities occurring inside the confines of the approximately 27,000 square foot building where delivery vehicles are manually loaded and unloaded from a proprietary material handling system. The new site is situated off County Road 154 adjacent to a light industrial area with direct access to the signalized intersection at Highway 82. The location offers good access to the Roaring Fork Valley region and is distant from residential densities. The building design and function is compatible with adjacent existing structures and industrial uses. An employee parking lot is located on the east side of the building and has direct access to the Highway 82 corridor. The non-public administrative office area is also located in the southeast quadrant of the building offering convenient entry for employees and the occasional visitor. The facility is not be designed or intended to accommodate individual customers driving to and from the site. It is projected that the proposed facility will operate 7 days a week with terminal operation for trailers and 5 days per week terminal operation for pick-up and delivery. Based on this it is anticipated that the proposed Federal Express facility at build-out will generate a total of 230 ADT with 47 trips (24 inbound/23 outbound) during the AM peak hour and 44 trips (24 inbound/20 outbound) during the PM peak hour. It should also be noted that this facility will not be open to the general public (see the Rick Engineering Traffic Impact Analysis submitted separately with this application). The operation will employ 14.5 full-time equivalent (FTE) workers; 9 full time and 9.5 part-time persons. The building will be accessed via a driveway intersecting County Road 154. The Traffic Impact Analysis discusses traffic volumes and recommended mitigation actions. Careful study has gone into the siting of the building on the property to ensure proper function and relationship to the site. The administrative office portion of the facility is in the south easterly quadrant of the building for good accessibility by operations personnel. The majority of the delivery van sized doors are located on the south and north sides of the building. Security of the parcels is a high priority for FedEx Ground and the drive-in doors will remain mostly closed for both aesthetic and security purposes. Page - 56 Clad in a palette of pleasing neutral colors with simple rooflines, the understated building is meant to serve as a subtle background rather than a focal point of the landscape. Articulated metal architectural wall panels allow the complimenting colors and projecting shade elements to breakdown the scale of the building and provide relief in a climate where shadow lines are crisp and clean and seldom muted over 65% of the year. Site grading and drainage will incorporate best management practices both during and after construction, including native re-vegetation of disturbed areas, erosion control and storm water quality measures. In keeping with the spirit of sustainable design, the facility makes generous us e of technologies and materials that conserve natural resources and limit the production of greenhouse gases. Large HVLS (high volume low speed) overhead fans are used in the distribution area to circulate air and provide a cooling affect. The structural components, roofing and wall panels are comprised primarily of steel, a material that approaches 90% in recycled content. Relationship to Garfield County Zone District Regulations The proposed site presently lies in unincorporated Garfield County in the southerly portion of the Glenwood Springs Urban Growth Area. The zoning on the property is Rural (R) which allows “Warehouse and Distribution Center” as a Major Impact Review use. In keeping with the requirements of the Garfield County Land-Use and Development Code, the project was evaluated for compliance with the Glenwood Springs Comprehensive Plan and its Urban Growth Area. The analysis is included in a subsequent section of this narrative. Significant Natural and Man-made Features on the Site The property is dominated by a series of relatively flat terraces situated at a prominent bend in the Roaring Fork River on the site of an old gravel pit. Each terrace is separated by a small, relatively steep slope that is characteristic of such river terraces in the Roaring Fork watershed. A dirt driveway passes Page - 57 through the property providing access from Old Highway. The upper terrace (on the east side of the property) is dominated by a flood irrigated hay field on the north with commercial development and the remnants of the old gravel operation. Another dirt driveway passes through this portion of the property paralleling the river to the west of the developed area. Outside of the hayfield and the developed areas, the vegetation is disturbed and quite sparse with large areas of bare soil. The slopes between the terraces are the most intact and the native plant communities that persist on those sites are likely remnants of the vegetation that once dominated the property. A more detailed description of the site, vegetation and wildlife is found in the Ecological Assessment Dated February 18, 2015 prepared by Colorado Wildlife Science, LLC and submitted as a separate attachment with this application. There is an existing solid waste service provider on the site which will remain and will be located on a separate 17.425-acre parcel in the proposed Minor Subdivision identified as Lot 2. This facility operates as a pre-existing use and under a separate Special Use Permit approved by Garfield County. Building Appearance The following page includes illustrations of the proposed building elevations. Page - 58 Building Elevations Page - 59 [I] ~ST ELEVATIO N Mt.TAI. WA.LL PAN EL ~ ~ ;., I "' ·.- I "' "' "' _t ~::;.ORTH ELEVATIO N !oak Atdolwt! ... ;:;;;:;,; •--... -.m-.... ...... -·-·- Page - 60 Landscape Plan The illustration below shows the landscaping concept. A Detailed landscaping plan is included with the engineered drawings submitted separately with this application. Page - 61 Professionally Engineered Drawings and Reports Professionally engineered drawings and reports submitted with this application include the following items that are submitted with this project narrative under separate cover. Water supply/distribution plan. An engineered utility plan is included with this submittal under separate cover. The three new minor subdivision lots are to be served by individual wells. Documentation showing good water quality, adequate physical supply and legal water sources is included in this submittal. The FedEx site proposes to use a commercial well with on-site storage which will serve both domestic water supply and fire protection. The applicant requests that the county allow construction and completion of the FedEx on-site water system a condition of the Certificate of Occupancy for the facility. Wastewater treatment plan. An engineered utility plan is included with this submittal under separate cover. Each of the three lots in the minor subdivision will be served by an on- site septic system proposed to be completed in conjunction with a building permit. Information on percolation rates and soils conditions is included with this submittal. In the case of the FedEx facility, a newly constructed on-site ISDS is proposed. The engineering design drawings show a system that will be adequate to serve the needs of the facility. An ISDS is a viable option for this facility that will have a maximum of 9 full time employees and 9.5 part-time employees or a total of 14.5 full-time equivalent staff. On-site wastewater generation is anticipated to be less than 2,000 gallons per day. Grading and Drainage Report/Plan. A drainage report and associated plans completed by High Country Engineering are included with this submittal under separate cover. Proposed roadway and parking area designs. Roadway and parking area design configurations are shown on the included High Country Engineering site plan submitted as part this narrative and included within this submittal under separate cover. Soil and foundation investigation. A geotechnical investigation completed by HP-Geotech is included with this submittal under separate cover. This report addresses soils and includes foundation design recommendations. Page - 62 Preliminary cost estimate for all public improvements. A preliminary cost estimate for site improvements is included with this narrative. Phasing schedule. The project will be constructed in a single phase. Access and Traffic. The queuing analysis that was performed for the traffic study shows an anticipated queue of 350 feet for the County Road 154 approach to State Highway 82, for opening year with project conditions. There is approximately 525 feet between the stop bar and the RFTA trail crossing, so the queuing from Highway 82 is not anticipated to have a negative impact at the trail crossing. In addition, vehicle access to the property has no queuing, so no negative impacts are anticipated from either side of the RFTA trail crossing. Please see following pages. Page - 63 Page - 64 Page - 65 Traffic analysis. A traffic study completed by Rick Engineering Company dated March 3, 2015 is included with this submittal under separate cover. The following table illustrates the projected vehicle trips to and from the site. It is projected that the facility will operate 7 days a week with terminal operation for trailers and 5 days per week terminal operation for pick-up and delivery. The table below shows the anticipated vehicle traffic flows at the full phase of operations. The proposed Federal Express facility at full-phase will generate a total of 230 ADT with 47 trips (24 inbound/23 outbound) during the AM peak hour and 44 trips (24 inbound/20 outbound) during the PM peak hour. It should also be noted that this facility will not be open to the general public. The site is expected to be staffed by 9 full-time employees and 9.5 part-time employees. Other Relevant Information Electrical Service. Xcel Energy. Natural Gas Service. Source Gas. Water/Sewer. On-site. Phone. Century-Link. Cable. Comcast. Fire Protection. Glenwood Fire Protection District Access to the Property. The subject property directly abuts County Road 154, a public street. Page - 66 The Garfield County Road and Bridge Department was contacted about a County Access Permit for the existing driveway. The Garfield County access permit records go back to 2003. The driveway to the property has been in use for many years and a permit was not found. The applicant will acquire the necessary driveway permits from Garfield County in association with development of the site. The following e-mail was received from Mike Phrem at the Garfield County Road and Bridge Department about driveway access permits. From: Michael Prehm [mailto:mprehm@garfield-county.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 9:06 AM To: Roger Neal Cc: Rayjean Kramer Subject: The FedEx Facility Roger, We checked our records and do not show a filed access permit for this location. In reviewing the preliminary data at this location an access permit could be granted. Mike Prehm Garfield County Road & Bridge Foreman / Glenwood District (970) 945-1223 Office (970) 945-1318 Fax. (970) 618-7109 Cell Page - 67 Water Supply Information. Page - 68 GARFIELD &HECHT, P.C. Lot 1 Major Impact Review David Pesnichak, Senior Planner March 11 , 2015 Page 2 of2 The application requests site plan approval on Lot 1 for a Federal Express warehouse and distribution facility. Water uses for the project include domestic (drinking and sanitary) for employees, approximately 15,450 square feet of landscape irrigation, and fire protection. All uses of water on the property will be supplied from an onsite well. For the above uses, Resource Engineering estimates an average daily water demand of 1070 gallons per day (gpd) (or 0.75 gpm). During the month of June, when water demand is the highest, Resource Engineering estimates an average daily water demand of 2370 gpd (or 1.8 gpm). Total annual water demand is estimated 'at 1.2 acre-feet. See Exhibit 2, page I. KW Glenwood Springs, LLC has drilled a new well on Lot 1 to meet its project water supply requirements. The well has been tested for quantity of production and water quality. The results of the well pump test are set forth in Resource Engineering's report attached as Exhibit 2. The report indicates that the well has a long-term yield of approximately 10 gpm, which is more than sufficient to meet the maximum average daily demand of 1.8 gpm. Water quality results are not yet available for the well and will be provided as a supplement to the application when available. Based on nearby wells, Resource Engineering anticipates that the well will meet basic EPA primary and secondary drinking water standards, but may require water softening treatment to eliminate hardness . In order to provide a legal water supply for the project uses, KW Glenwood Springs , LLC has submitted an application for water allotment contract to the Basalt Water Conservancy District, approval of which is pending, and has submitted a production well permit application to the Colorado Division of Water Resources, a copy of which attached as Exhibit I. Upon is suance of the well permit, applicant will submit it to the County as a supplement to the site plan application. Permitted uses of the well will be consistent with the project uses listed above . Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, GARFIELD & HECHT, P.C. /l/!~U. d!au~ ~JC- Nicole Garrimone-Campagna Enclosures (Exhibits 1-4) 1272772 -1 @ Printed on recycled paper Page - 69 COLORADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 1313 SHERMAN ST, RM 821 , DENVER, CO 80203 Mai n: 13031 866-3581 Fax: 13031 866-2223 d"~nnrt~ate co us GENERAL PURPOSE Water Well Permit Application Review Instructions on reverse side prior to completing form. The form must be computer generated, typed or In black or blue Ink. 1. Applicant lnfonnation Name or 9Pt)limnt KW Glenwood Springs, LLC Maolong- 2525 East Broadway. Suite 201 Crty s .... Tucson AZ ZIJ)code 85716 T~#(lfHaxle&nu-1 E-mat11..-r•ogroqunaJ EXHIBIT 1 Office Use Only l Fonn GWS-45 (07/2013) 6 . Use Of Well (check applicable boxes) Attach a delailed description of uses applied for. D lndusllial D Oewalering Syslem D Municipal D Geolhennal (production or reinjection II] i rrigation . • Other (describe): .ffr.L f()ro f..e c.ftol:(. [I) Commercial 7 . Well Data (proposed) 1------------k_e_v_in_@=-th_e_k_ie_r_n_a_n_c_o_m..:.p_a_n_ie_s_.eo_m_-l Maio"""'~,.,. "'=2.:-T-=y..:.p_e_O_f_A.....:....pp:....l_ic_a_ti_o_n-'('-ch_e_c_k=a~p..:..p_lica_b_le_bo_x_e_s.:...) -----l 15 D Construct new well Ill Use existing well Tolll - gpm Annual amount to be Withdrawn 1 .2 acre-reet Aqu41f 0 Replace existing well D Change or Increase use 115 feet tributary 8 Change source (aquifer) D Reapplication (expired penn~) 8. Lan d On Which Ground Water Will Be Used i.:;:...:C~OG~C~C~W:.:..:::el;,I ,----,.,---,....,...,--.l:O:LOt~h::,:er..:.,;. ======---I Legal Description of Land (may be pro;ided •• 1n 1ttae11m1n1) 3. Refer To (if applicable) we1_..., -..eouncase# Lot 1, Eastbank, LLC Minor Subdivi sion (see attached plat) 296873 n/a ~Ban DetenronallOn • WfAnameor• KW Well 4. Location Of Proposed Well Co<mty Garfield .!..N'-'W-'--__ 11 .. 1""' SE '" Sea.on Townahp Nor S R111ge E or W Pnnopal tMn6an 35 6 " I 89 D El 6th 0.lllancl "' .... ""'" -lneo (•dlon .._ ... typoc:dy ""' propol1y I.nos) 2430 Fl fn>m N X S 2565 FL tron{'X]E OW For~-IMf-clollanOl1ndd<f'OCllOllfn>m°'d-1Dnewwel feet w e1 1ocaon •Odr'eU (lnctuoe c.cy, State. Up) 0 CMCk ff wel adc:nu 11 same as i.n Item 1 3925 County Road 154, Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Optional: GPS well loca110n informabon on UTM fonnat You must check GPS unit for reqwred settings ""follows Format mus1 oe UTM Ii I Zone 12orl:J Zone 13 Units muJ& be Meters Datum muat be HA083 IJrN l mull be Ml lO true notth Easting 302597 Ncxthlng 4373136 Was GPS ""' dled<ed for_..,? 0 YES Remember to sot Datum to NAD83 5 . Parcel O n Which Well Will Be L ocated (PLEASE ATTACH A CURRENT DEED FOR THE SUBJECT PARCEL) A. Legal Description (may bo pn>Yldod •• 1n 1u.ctvnen1) Upon minor subdivision approval by Garfield County, the legal description will be Lot 1, Eastbank, LLC Minor Subdivision (sed attached plat) (Part of Par cel 2A, Eastbank Parcel 2 Lot Split) c . °""" 3 .848 Ea stbank LLC , et al. D. y,u 11>1oo.,.orty ...,.on1r11 paro111 !!:) vesO NO (d no kll -""b l E. s .... P•rml 100 ,_, (If used ror crop imgaijon, attach a scaled map lhat shows onigated area.) -A. '"°"' B. °"'* 3.848 Eastba nk LLC, et al. C. Ullllf'fotno<wel1orW3tefnglltsUMdonlholland n/a 9 . Proposed Well Driller License #(optional): 10. Sign or Entered Name Of Appflcant(s) Or Authorized Agent The making of fa lse stalements herein constitutes periury In the second degree. which is punishable as a dass 1 misdemeanor pursuant to C.R.S. 24-4·104 (13)(a). I have read the statements herein, know lhe conlents lhe:7 :and stale that they are true 10 my knowledge . 5\9" Of I« Nml(I) of pot10n(1) ;-~ Oate (~) \. ----,...... \) ---o)ki~·~ If ~;..,. name 1no,... Kevin Kiernan, Manager of Four P ine, LLC, Member of KMKI!! Office Use O nly USGS map name AOUAMAP WE WR cwce TOPO MYLAR SBS OWRmapno Surface elev Recelpl area only DN __ WD __ BA __ MD __ Page - 70 Form No. G\NS-25 APPLICANT OFF IC E OF THE STATE ENGINEER CO LORADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 818 Centernia Bit.I~ .• 1313 She1 man S t., Denver, Coloradu 80203 (3C3) 866-3581 EXST WELL PERMI T NUMBER ___ 7~9~0~70~--·~f __ DIV . 5 WD38 DES. BASIN MD Lot: 1 Block: Fil ng : Subc·1v: EASTBANK LLC MINOI< PARCEL 2A EASTF\A NK PAR-CL 2 KW GLENWOOD SPRINGS LLC 2525 EAST BROADWAY, SUITE 201 TUCSON , AZ 85716- APPROVE D WELL LOCATION GARFIELD COUNTY NW 114 SE 1 f4 Section 35 Township 6 S Range 89 W Sixt1 P.M. DIST ANCES FROM SECTION LINES 2430 Ft. from South 2565 Ft. from Eas t Section Line Sec tion Line UTM COORDINATES (Mete rs.Zone13 .NAD83) CHANG E/EX PA NSI ON OF US E OF AN EX I ST ING W EL L Eas t ng · Northing: ISSUANC E OF T H IS PERMIT DOES NOT CO NFE R A WATER RIGHT CONDITIONS OF APPROVA L 1) T nis well sho ll be used in such 3 way as to cause no material Injury to exls:lng water r ights. The l ssJance of th is permit does not ensure :hat r .o i~j ury will occu r to anothe r vested water right :;r preclude anot1er owr er o' a vested waler right from seekir g re lief in a c•vil ccurt act on. 2) Tie construction of this well shall be in compliance will-the Water Well Constructioi Rules? CCR 402-2 un ess approval of a variance has been granted by the State BJard of Exam ne rs of Water Well Construc1ion and Pump Installation Contractors in accordance with Rule 18 3) Approved pursuant to CRS 37 -90 -137(2) on the co1difon Iha: this well is operated as ar alternate point of diversion to the Basalt CondJit (if applicable per decree) and in accordaice with one or more of the augmentat on plans approve o by the Div. 5 Water Court to· the Basalt Wa:er Conser1a1cy Ois:·ict in Case Nos 87CW0155, 93CW0319, 98CW00?6/98CW0059, 81CW0305, & O?CW0077 (And Case No . 10CW0047rt 1n Area A-3 as oescribcd in d ,~crce). or oper atirg pJrsuant to an oppro11ed substi:ute water supp ly plan . If this well is not operated in accordance with the te·ms cf said decree(s) or SWSP, It will be subject to aoml·1istration in cl uding ·Jrders to cease diverting water. BINCD contract 11653 . 4) Approved 'or the ir.stallation of a pump in, and the use cf, an existing well , ccnstructed en March 2, 2015, to a depth of 115 feet , unc er perm t no. 296873 (ca ncelec). lsstJAnC',P. ot thi s permit hereby c-.aicels permit no. 2 268n. 5) T ne use of ground water 'rom :his wel , is limited to fire protection, drinkin g and sani tary facilities for" ccmrrrt!1c·a1 tusiness and the inigaticn of not more than 15,450 square fee t of lawnilandscape. Water from tris well shall not ~e used for any other pwp""'e outside the tusiness building structure(~) Th is well is know RS KW Well. 6) T ne pumping rate of this wall shall not exceed 15 GPM. 7) T ne annual wi thdrawal of grocnd water from t 1is well shal l not ex:eed 1.18 acre-fool 8) Tne return f low from t ne use of this well must be through either a central treatment system. a septic tank and each fi eld system , 01 an evaporative system, wh i c~ever does not exceed the amount spec;ifiec in the Basalt contract. 9) T he owner shall m ark. the well in a conspio.1 ous place w th well r.·erm 1t n u mher(~). name of t he aquifer, And cour1 case nur;ber(s) as appropriate. The ow1er shall take 1ecessary means and precautions :o presef\/e ;riese marki1gs. 10) T nis well shall be located not more than 200 feet frJm the lccation specified on this perrnil and at least 600 feel from any existing well, corrrµle~eu n tile same aq uife r, Iha'. is not owned by the app lican t. 11/ A totalizing flow rreter m ust be in stallec on this well and maintained m good working order. Permanent records of all diversions mus: be rraintaiied by the well owner (recorced at least annua ly) and s~bmitted to the Di visior Engine er upon request. NOTE: This we I i s to be located on a tract of lan d of 3.948 acre(s) described as lot 1, Eastbank LLC M in or Sur.division, A Subd1111s1on of Parcel 2A Of Eastbank Parcel 2 Lot S~lit Garfield County. NOTE: Section 35 is an ir·egu ar "Tall and Narrow" section. NOTE: Parcel loentifi:aticn Number (PIN ): 23-2185 -353 -04-001 NOTE: Ascessor Tax Schedule Number: R083020 (totaling 38.2 .:cres) APPROVED DMW Rece1ol No. 9503931 DATE ISSU ED 06-04-2015 By EXPIRAT ION DATE 05-04-2016 Page - 71 PL J \ T M O T E S : \. &d S < ! l ' ~ r c l l l 1 1 a ~ G A . : . . . . . f l _ , . ' I J " W l r n c D I M u . i t C I U . t i l m l l C C l l l l l G al ' m : l l C l l l A A l ' I M l l ~ " " ° IC 1 G T C I U M ' C D t t r E 1 l e l f Ji l , A R I C l ' Q . l l D l f f ' V I C l ,, __ :t . ° " 1 t f # l M : S S J M T * S JM M l l Y 23 . 20 l l S . AT M ; M l r m . M \ i ( ' ( M J l l l ti l t . S I ro o t tr _ , . .. , . . , _ J. M S a l l ' C T l l l A D < * l l R D 1 D f • t t n "' - A T "° M I E D I Y .. . O I M I L . . . - . C . U C . r l WS t a N « M G MO ll ' M ) l l l IM 0 4 . ~ ~" " ' 9 1 ' 1 0 / l l D l ' t f ~ ( # N # U1 1 ' 9 1 U T l l C l Q l l l t O A t l U I P ' I O I M O . , , . . . _ ~- l l ) t Q : l l l l e C I O l l l l C l l l f ' C U I O W P 4. "H S . . . . a 1 T r • t & r C T ' J O l l l C 9 ¥ A 1 0 d , , l l l C l " l l l l C ' D I C O ' O N f f ' l • r M O C > m t 1 f l C O l l l l ) O l t •" - . d # G O C l " 1 1 0 C l l O W M ~ I M K W U . Q O l l i l l C M H T M 7 A M Z > I T ~ 1 1 U OJ M M n ' <: J J W N t t . OA D IN t J l < l f f I t , lD ' l l . ( f U Ml . M D I :M U G ) . !! ! ! : : ! l : ! 2 ! ! ! i 1, lM S " ° " ° ' " ' ! S l l M C T l O f l l l f T t : l l ~ r l ' A ' O t O l l L O C l l l O ~ A M D l l l W C M l l S O M : ~. . ( F ~ ~ =. : .. : - ' c J ! s ~ ~ = : ; =. r e : g . , ~ ~ i : - , . . . . N IO C I C U Al , MX IO t AS fC C I J ' f t O M M0 . 2\ t . . . 2. 'l l t S N C W R T Y t s a . L C T n l l l O n " f / / f ' M T r o l ' D n O G C l l l CM M . J ~ I T ' I H £ A i l ' 1 M D I W T Y O f ' M : UN I U I ST . \ l D 111 1 " 2 I M l l .. \ N D lt l . ' 1 1 ,., . l l M ' "lC C l f l l D C D MA Y lO . . 1 • . t i IO C I K 12 AT ,I « a . #D 4 l l & t : c : t l l l 0 m u c 1 , 1• • t O C 1 C 12 A l r. 1 « 11 • N G "" 'l l : l t . • n NC I ,U ,. \ C I "i . ., -- . s . CO C l n O I S . NC M l l O l d . ~ . . c: & J C l . - . S .. a co c t A l l C . . CN l f t L O o: u . r r ll J Q J l 1 I O r f 11 • )1 ) ll l D X l l C C or c o . J I : n , 19 1 "T I U P 1 Q l l II ) . ~ O Q E I N O T lt l 1 ' U : f 1N l " ' 9 £ T "' ° " 2 1 ! f ' r . S. ~C Q C l l T I O I C l . ~ A C l l l l J O ' T I N I O o a J C A . . . '4 C I O l f 1 M C D l l ~ c o . N I T ~ 0 - W ll l [ C I O l l l X D ll l A T 11 . 1t r N A t ll l C U P ll O . ~Z U 7 , • S O r ~ AS M T #f f U ' T "I C -- . . 1l a G . . ~ MIO fl l l W M I Q d 01 rA J O O f ro t W . D LM l£ C a l l l : O l' t M J M T IS . I MS . . eo c . . . . . . , ' 1 4 1' & . • D Lt C td l O ' f i l S i O I H MX D M . t C J C \ O l S o l O c . d l C J f l ' D C O ll O l ' C l l ' C l l S S .. . . . . . . . _, , . , . . 7 . ~~ = ~ ~ ~ ~ l ' f t l l f 1 ( N ~ o : Q O I 0 7 , tt f 7 A J U O ' l l ) ( & E l l d . CC l l C l l ' I O l l ! L ~ ~ . . C 9 J ! M l l l 0 " m . . ~ ~ r a > a D l' T ~ ~ f D l l J # f f 1. 2 0 0 t A T . . , . . , , . l l O . Jm 7 ' . • l l ) f M # I K Y # ' t C Q H - - . . ~ CD O ' I O M I 1H t 11 1 M N M N S °' l t l l a & . M - . ~ LG > C ll t C a l l X D li l l l O I S f a. ao c a AT ll l l C I H O l l l 11 0 . t1 C 1 U Z Il l JI > , .. . Al H Y '1 l f ' f l : T K 9. & C t T NO f Q T Y . lQ . 1D 1 1 t 4 CO O " J Q I S # t 0 ' * " ' 4 9 0 d ~ CA S ~ 9 C * ' I O # d l l : O l l O f ' f MC O l l D m 1.1 . . Y i t , z: i o t l l . f ~ ... . ,. , , , . ft . tl . I O C J t T l . CO l l O C I G . . CO O # f 1 I . IU n l C ' I O M I . . . . . IO N S NO *' 1 D Q I M WP ar W 1 M « l. O f ~ l l l : a a J ; l . l J I C ) Q . J O O t l M Q l l C t V " l l O J i l l l Q . ~ # D ~ l ' M l : 0 . 2 L O f . v t IE ' X l l t l l J ) ,l / l l N N f t l . . 20 l l A f l l { C I J l " I Q M f l l Q . fl ) 4 C l l . IJ . '1 > 1 1 . cu c r r o c t . . ~ a . I C N I . QI L Q n o G M C > I A I D I D f ' l l M t n r Q l l ' l l Nl f > O l l l A M ' l l l l l AC C E S S #I O U ' . m u. . D C M T MJ I D I O t t Jl l l X I M O .U C ~ IO t 1 ' UI C O tU D ' f t C l l l • 77 0 4 4 l . C l i l . 1 1 1 1 ~ Y f1 f . _ _ _ _ . . . . _ , , , . ~ 1 I U OH I W m ' C: C W N ! f f M ~ . . , _ . l .., , C K T l l ' l ' J W O . . . O I C l l l . •- O o \ ' t f l - - - "' ' r r : i i : W C - . ™ ' 6 1 t a 1 1 0 : 1 • & a ~ ~ ~ e ~ ~ E A S T B A N K , L L C M I N O R SU B D I V I S I O N A SU B D I V I S I O N O F PA R C E L 2 A OF EA S T B A N K PA R C E L 2 L OT S PL I T A PA R C E L OF LA N D S I TU A T E D IN T H E S 1 / 2 SE C T I O N 3 5 , TO W N S H I P 6 SO U T H , RA N G E 8 9 W E S T O F TH E 6T H P . M . CO U N T Y OF GA R F I E L D , ST A TE OF CO L O R A D O ~ V1 C i M r T Y MA P e; : ; : z ; I • £1 I D i t CO ! J NT Y SU R Y ! X O R ' ! C D m ' 1 C A T E N' N O ' O n i t CO O D I T NI I (Q l l l i l ~' t NI O ll C l t N /l l J O A f l C r O f ~ CM . C U . A " » S NI I OI W l l C l"l . l l l 9 . I M T 1 1 > ~ • • •·1 o i • m n t e Q . M D M l _ O A ' t O T 20 I S . " " 1 1 - _ ; w f t h l l ™ i l ™ C! p ! ! ! ! " f S A D O P ' T A X D ~A I D l 'M l. M l l : J n t C l r G . O O I G D ' l ' C O f r f ' - . rM : D f W M O M f ( f l T A ) O N'I O ~ c u Nl > " A Y * L . . " ' - - - - t. . o 1 AU . "M C C . I O l ll E M . . U f A l l ll D a l l l M D Qll l M S "' - A T I C " " " rw . O A 1 t D M S - D A Y O I .. . 0 . . 2 0 I L .. . . . Wi C & i f r l ' ' i t A . t t i D i CO \ J N T ' Y CO M " ! ! S I O N C R S ' CE R T I '1 C A T s : 9A D l . l ' O l l M M ' I O l # C l f l l l C O l l i l i D I O W O l l O I M O N l n D . O C O U N l T C I J l l C 1 0 I O I O C 1 9 A . 1 ' 1 T ' r ~ . M IC W O (f l CO M T ' f CC l t M O O I C M OI CN t l ' C L O CO J N T ' f , Q1 C I A A D O , MO O T #' N I M S tt G "" * " =~ ~ M , ! l r c . c u n a N U • M ~ .. C:C ~ 1 1 : ' : . . X ~ ~ ~ . _ . lm l ' . I M , M g ' f 10 I C ,. , , . . O M . _ , #f t f N " - • 1G • Y < * J C . A 1 D C o r r # ' D D GD l . l ( f y tQ l l : ' I C FI C # O l l C Q l l C C M P U Y I C I M O f ~ C I N L M I C I C . ll U a . I C ~ _, . . . . l ' S C f t " ' 1 D r i l D m D m l t 4 1 Q 1 1 D 1I C ~ ca P T AS M: c : n : , t r U , , Y AG I U D l 9 r t K IO M O fS c: D M T ' f CO l l S I C M J l l S l' r DM A 1 t .. . , . , . , , _ ow . w t . IC M > " a: u n Y C Q M D Q I G S tA l n l O CO M T T , CQ . £ l l U O O S1 G S t i t !W e N e 1t N . . °' H CO M n ' Of GA # 1 l A .. . . . . ~ = = ~ - - - - - - C\ . . E R K A N D R l C O ! ! D f f l ! C ! I B 1 1 f ! C A T E . . flO l . A f _ , N O r o t l l f t : O l l O • M t : n ' C l t O l ' M Q D I C NG ~ f l C A # ' C D C O i l m ' A f ~ O \ l ' M l - " ' ' r f l _ _ _ u .lO l ~ N I O S l l l U . Y MJ X ' C l a > f t i6 \ i t t CE R T I F IC A T E OF DE D I C A TI ON OW N ERSHIP 1 1 C ~ W. . . U . C . , . C C U - . . O O \ M ' C U l i a l ' l ' f o t W # l ' f ,~~~WIJSI' 9 A ' l l ~ 21 . 2I O O O M C I N1 1 1 1 A . . . . - 0 0 1 1 1 ll l l l E \ O C l & . l 'a4TC...11J> KmiM1 21. JtaDllf'Q 1111\t:Ol lllJ. ~ r ll l t M . . .. . - a m nM . f t D 11 GW ' m O oc u m . OO C M a 1 ..., rw.o. AM l l C l l . f l l tM C > U I C A t D M DC S l ! l l 1 M I W J d lt ' C I C l l l lll.109CMP 1 IQllWt,. ~ ltCSl" Nff4 . . a ' M . ll O I D W l o . lW C ! C l n a . Y f l 1M l CD t 1 D U C Of M -t'ClllC JNJI NII ~T 011H11: ll D i l r M C I W I C 1 1 W 1 9 ' Q R T A ' I O I C N l 1 l l O l t T ' f ' l l O f 1 ' 4 - - $ T - O C U l l L l i O O S t A l l l G l ' l l M Y • l l O f 1 ' . . . q ' ... 't,IDt: IG I : 'N l 1 C U . N L T oc : u m l l ~ R:I U . O W I : . . . _ A T Al l C N T O I C • D l ' M C S " I O l . T ~ YtlfCCllJIWIOSl A W,.,_T aa.,AIPM#C»W nl l . M l l PV r a ' . (* 1 C C WC D l l l C A I T C D I C J l , , M 9 a'C1DI U. IOCA >t/"i• M.11-..i W . lt#tl " " ' 4 ' 1 f t A Cl l l t N C Z 01 Jl m M tu t \ : 'I O C t CI O ' M M SAi> lllltll -<lf'-IM Y C1'14 '"i1'W A OISTNfClt Cl' Ja.JZ fa T 10 A f' Q H T • M CD f 1 D l J C (f l K ~ r t M lll'O: toa K 'IU.NIO 1H1U (J) eo.MCS N.M SA O CD l ' O l . I C tT 1M I MW t l l C fl l l l C l f O 1 . 11 7 ' 1 ' ) 4 ' . l f " S .. O d ' f # C [ t i . . .. , rl E t . t. "7 4 1 " Z l " W .. Ol l T N Q : t i . . . . R n '- _, , n : Z ' W A 11 1 1 ' A l t C l " 01 1 Ja . O l l ft r T : M> 1 C 1 ll D " A l l 1 l l t 0 MO CIJt'IDUC !llM'4Tll'"W A Cl.nNtCI tr 122.00 M T , 1H D t C 1 : IJ ' 1 " 0 S O n ' A 01 S t A 1 G ( F 24 t . . C ~ 'n t O I C l :&vd'Y"W A OdTNCI 01 ll.00 l'Crt lMOQ IO C l ' O O ' o o " t A OI S W G . f: t l l: z . 4 2 f' U T ; 1K O U J n ' 3 1 ' 4 0 " W A O t J l ' M I Z r;tf a,:71ra:a.1MQICZ M/1tlC A WrC:On' Q l l t ' C ro H ~ MA W I C • aA D U S " 7 45 . 0 0 nn . " comw. NQ.l (I t4'2S'OI". A DCTNG: al WM n:n (C> O O l l« N O 9 4 . . . . , . . . . ,. . ll l S ' l ' N G : 01 1 1 1 . H fU ' I ) ; : M>ilCl" Sf1"11l4"'w A Od'f#ICl Of 11a.M nzt 1MDG S' J l " •T . . - . A Oil T A l f C E Cf ' Ut . _ . nE 1 l M > c r 11 ' 1 t ' W t O " l t A llSTNICI. Of _,,. '1n 'ltGiCZ N..Cll O A l' I O i l - T N Q ) t T Oo # r l C "° .. . ll l C l l T MA . . . . . IW J l , l l " IS 1 ' . 0 0 nn, A COnRAL NQJ: or OMTV', " omNG al 11 . ) . 2 4 fU T (0 4 C l l l l KN I S MO : l ' . . . 2 !' "W A OI S f A H C : t t i tt . l r . 1 1 fU'll 110Cr Jt0a'07')0"W ,.. OISTNQ: OI ..,,... fttf; M > Q ., . . . . , . . . . . . . A DI S l N I C I O' ' " - " ' '1 l ' t nO Q : .t o l , Q « ; A TNtCDIT CUM la 'ltC IDT M.Awoc;: A !VOJI rJI' l. l l . O O f m . A CD f t l l M . A M C I J . f } I O l " l f ' M " (CH O l l O 11 . M t S M ' I Z ' l n t ' W A CllSfAIG: fJ'ts.31 rrrTk Mt« 'l l n l " l t " ' w A OI S t A f l C l ' tT 90 . 1 1 l t n fM O I C t Al . . C M : A TNQ)IT CUM 'IO 'M WT HAlllC A ILGJI OI XI0.00 ru t ' , A <D 1 I V C , ll H C I . . ( f/ I 'l l T f W P " , A t* S W U Ol 1 0C U 0 fUT (OIOllD 1E>oU llt4'44'U"W A CllSfNICllC fl \Ot.11 IU ' I ) . M) I C I : l! O n r ' O ' T " W A (l l S t N C t . t i 1t 1 . & J 1'1 £ 1 : 'H M C I "4ncl'W£ A OIS'l'#ICt ti 1U2 rat, 1tOCI ~ " t A cs t # I C l Of U O I nr f : M ) l l X N0 0 ' 1 4 ' ' 4 " W A OISfAloU fJl 1 11..IM fUt ~ 11~'21"t A ll l l T . l f l l X ,, , 1 » . J t f' l l ' r . : ll C N C C 1t 1 . n n n : . , 01 S t A M C : t or. .. ,, nn lHDKI ~ .. DmNMZ 01 IM."n rr l ' T 'I O A ,, , _ , . O\ I H IC l t l O L Y IQ l M W l ' T f1 f . nt : mun; KALT fl &All llC'nOlt :Jiii HMCE: OC111Httl0 MO _ , , . . , . , . , -. M I N r r IO O i ! T + 4 " t A OB T NI C t t i ' 4 7 .l t nrt M>tC£ Al.CllO H "'*= fll A CUM: 'IO K lOT MA . . _ A "" ' 1 I U S OI UO . O O m : t A Q ) f M . ll M J . E Of ll 0 ' 1 4 ' o r . A OISt'NCt f7 .. 11.n n:rl . (OOID ..- su i r f f ' 1 " OI S T A l l C I ( I tl 7 ' . 0 C nr r k M > U .. , . 4 2 " ' 7 " ( , . QinMCI ti 171.S.) nrt 1tllMZ H4n4 '0l"'W A OS T M C f f l ~ · 11 1 ' 1 ' : OD I C I "W W 3 1 " 1 : A m t N C l ti~ nrT 1Q A Oil flCll<t'f tlC ~1 ll C M - c l f ' • t M T C1' 1H [ . . . , , . . . . ,_ 1' t # l : W ' a n A t D S ~ MJ9IZ ~MD •OlllflO'IOU llCMY-O'·•T IM . , . . . " t A O S W i C l : t l ' 2 Z 1 ~ F D T ~ A f ' Q l f t C l l ' H ~ T l l O i " f ' . O f ' ... T fSOMllAOOST" .. . . . . . ., c t H > G K n : w M C S I 00 cc u a o A . Q C !.Ill)..,,...,....,., MOtT-4 -•T ~ CDlOIUOO n .... _T .. l. $ t n l ' . r ' l A Ol l t . . . . . Z f: T i: i o J 2 .r r J : J. S 4 n t n r ' I A ll l l f M C l f l » t . m l" I I ' t 1. .. - u ' W " t A O I S t M C l ' C f ' tU . & l l ' " ' ° 4. Dl ' 4 C '. r ' l A ll S T " N C [ ( f l 11 & . 1 1 n p : L ~, . C l l S T N t C ! V W l . l l f l l r t t. SS T Q ' t 4 '1 A CI S l ' l l l Q f l 90 . f l fl [ T lO !W ' ps w ! « M'!PM; $ICI 'MIU. f7 Ufoa C I C W B 1 " 1 1 - D A T t l MJ . . l l l n S . ~ fA l 1 I N l l UC . .. CiC l . O I W I O I . M D u. w m C / N l ' M f .. __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ IT Al t O l f ~ L " " " " ' " ' - - - ) ll C ro M O O I C l < D W ' l l : A . 1 " * OI CC l l C A D I M O ~ WAS~ .:rw:te M --'" Of' . 20 ! 1 . f t ~ Ol'W...W:.A co . . G l t A O O 1.1 1 1 1 ' 1 1 L l * I T T CO # N l ' f .. _ .. . . . . __ __ __ _ "1 ' I O I t n tl # I O NG om a M . SE A i . ~ CI M l l ; Q Q . l i l t T M w . G l l C GCll ! : ~ l M I S ' l ' ° " Q (il[mmJllrt,JOOO f t _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ fT A W: t l C I C L C R A O O l "" " " ' " ' - - - r ~ = : £ : : : o ~ w . s ~ 1 1 r o . . c ~ ~ ~ .. - - - - - - - - - •N : a w t M N O # I D c m a . . t . l l M . .. , , . , . . . . . , ~l \ a l A ~ l l l l r « l & C ' l l l l d T " O A D ~ n.:llXIO .. . ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ nA ' l l f l C X L Q l l l , , t O O L _. . . , __ _ ) t; = W = l ~ : - : : O * ~ - S ~ I U O l l C C 1 ; ' ~ ~ ., . _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ ll m G I .. .. . IW C > . . om c t A I . KA I . . ii O l M l ' " ' * ' ° ~11 la• ~ii. '~:~ ..,............ ti ~ cS • ~ "i ~ Id!-• ~ ~8£ ~ ~!a!! .... <;,. u ;;iU r ~1 Cl x ~ ~ zg ~g ~~~ I nn ~~ i:I~~ ~~ :E~ < ~ -"°' 21S100S.00 Ft Page - 72 I \ \ l L a Y _ . . , . f - . : r WI ' - . sw r . a - - ., _ EA S T B A N K , LL C MI N O R SU B D I V I S I O N A SU B D I V I S I O N O F PA R C E L 2 A O F EA S T B A N K PA R C E L 2 LO T SP L I T A PA R C E L O F LA N D SI T U A T E D IN TH E S 1 / 2 SE C T I O N 3 5 , TO W N S H I P 6 SO U T H , RA N G E 8 9 WE S T OF TH E 6T H P. M . CO U N T Y O F GA R F I E L D , ST A T E O F CO L O R A D O ( \ \ l I ~ ~ ' ' .- · I nn CQ e l A' C K l l : \ O l ( ' ! I M l ( , . W f - -j -,~ ~ , - ~ ~ ,-.., , ~ n ; r , - 7 " 1 : : : .. . . . . - ~ - -- -~ ~ ~ ~ . . . . _ - __ , _ _ _ _ , ---- ~ ~ ~ ~ .: ; z ~ 0: ~ z ~ I CJ W > l l I C SC A L E 'k r . w l J . - 1 I i < • t a r ) , .. . , __ "- ~-= = - : ~ ' = J ~ ~ ~ = : P. 1 ~ ~ 1 fA i 0 . " . . N l < l O 'r $~ n .. . ,~ C i "i l O : f ' < " - ' C : l ~ t t l" ° N a q : t c> c . f . GO L F ca 1 ~~ S l:: • • .Y f , ' I S T Q . \ N • r Fl l . . ! i'. . : G l ID : ... F l -cu R ' V E - T A B L E '°" ~ ,. M C O . 2. I. O f SPUT a, ,. . . . . . . . . \; ~HO . . . ~ 1. ---------~--;--- _ .. / .. . -· · --- ,, . . . . . . - - - ---DETA l\.A ~ ' ' b~I~ ~~I I IU~ ~ ~ f'~ ~ 15 ' z -; ii: ~a I.I.I o .. Ill ~·~" z •8•:: i; ~:i~,; z .1,; ~ Ill ~fi IJ ~ §.$ i: ~~h~ O -iw ~ I !:! ::c 0 8 ~ u:i z o ~9 u ::l ~s x s s:u h ~~~ ~B ~,.6 Gu .-i«u ~~ 1:1~9 ~~ ~~ < CJ •••>•:enc . Z \a lOOS.00 F2 Page - 73 Page - 74 Page - 75 Page - 76 Page - 77 Page - 78 Page - 79 Page - 80 :i. ···Forni No.. OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER EXHIBIT 3 · Gw~:25 ., . ' COLORADO· DMSION OF WATER RESOURCES 8HI C•nwnnl•I Bldg., 1313 Sherman St, Denver, Color11do 80203 {303) ee&-35&1 LIC WELL PERMrT NUMBER 050236 -E__-_ 6E!EUCANT DIV. S CNTY . 23 WO 38 DES . BASIN MD Lot: Block : FIMng: Subdtv: APPROVED WELL LOCATION GARFIELD COUNTY JOE & GERALDINE JAMMARON BOX 1631 rm 114 Twp 65 SE 1/4 Section 35 RANGE 89 W · 6th P.M. GLENWOOD SPRING CO 81602- DISTANCES FROM SECTION LINE§ (970)945-2554 1700 Ft. from South Section Line PERMIT TO USE AN EXISTING WEU 1950 Ft from East ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT CONFER A WATER RIGHT CONDITlONS OF APPROVAL Section Line 1) This well shall be uatd in such a way as to cause no material Injury to existing wate r rights . The issuance of the permh does not assure the applicant that no Injury will occur to another vested water rtghl or preolUde another ownOf of a vesttd water rtght from seeking rellet In a civil court action. 2) The construction Of this well shall be In compliance with the Water Well Construction Ru les 2 CCR 402·2, un less approval of 11 variance ha& been granted by the Slate Board of Exam iners Of Wei.er Well Gonsuuctlon and Pump lnstallallon Contractors In accordance with Rule 18. 3) Approved pursuam to CRS :J7 ·90-137 (2) for the use Of en existing well, constructed without e permh, appropriating ground water trlbutlll)' lo the Roaring Fork River, as an alternate point of diversion to the Basan CondUlt, on the condition that the well shall be oparated 2Q&! when the Basalt Water Conservancy District's subsutute water supply plan, approved by the State Engineer, is in effect and when a wirier allotment c:omract between the well <>:Nner and the Basalt Weter Conservancy Dlstr1ct for the release of replacement wciter from Rued i Reservoir is In effect, QI under an approved plan for augment811on. BWCO contract 4'312. ---··--·· . --··--· -------·-·· ---· ·4) The use of ground water from th ia well ia limited to dr!Rdng and sanllmy purposee Inside a 4,000 squant toat oftloe/nlpalr shop buldlng. occasional lnlCk ...trTig and floor W11ShJng, and noc more 1han 1,000 8QU8l'9 feet ot larld9cape 1n1ga11on. All vse ol · this we ll wlll b9 curtailed unless the water allotment cont ract or a plan for augmentation (a in enact. 'f\\i:) 'T ('~o(~ Ii) The maxmum pumping rate shall not exceed 15 GPM. 6) The average annual amount of ground water to be appropriattd shall not exceed 0.4 acrv-ftlot (130,332 gallons), 7) A totallzing ftow meter must be lnstaUed on this we ll and malnlalned In good working order. Permanent records of al d!verslons must be malmalned by the we ll owner (recorded at least annually) and submitttd to the DMslon Engineer upon request . 8) The well must be locattd not more than 200 feet from the locetlon specified on this permit. 9) This well shall be located at least 600 felt from any existing well that la not owned by the applicant. 10) The owner shall m«k the we• In a con spicuous piece wtth well permit number(e), nll/118 of the aquifer, and court case number(s) as appropriate . The owner shafl lakt neoe$Sary means and prec11Alon1 to preseive these markings. 11) This permit has been approved to withdraw an amount of water not to exceed 0.4 acre.foot and to be used as described in condition #4 above. You are hereby notified that you have the right to appeal the issuance of this permH, by filin g a written req uest with this office within sixty (80) days or the date of lssvance, pursuant to the State Adm inistrative Procedures Act (See Section 24-4-104 through 106, C.R.S .). -ri,O "?(~ . APPROVED KJW n ._· -A_~_b _. __ J'.._,'_~---,~-p.s&z.'zC ..... Receipt No. 04303821M!wEngi ... •• DATE ISSUED JUL Q 8 1998 ~!RATION DATE JU l 0 8 199g Page - 81 Nicole Garrimone-Campagna, Esq. Garfield & Hecht, P C 4 20 Seventh Street. Suite 1000 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 RE Eastbank, LLC-Lot 2 Existing Well Pumping Test Results Dear Nicole: EXHIBIT 4 March 10, 2015 This letter rep art presents the technical analysis of the water supply from the existing well located on the proposed Lot 2 of the Eastb ank, LL C Min or Subdivision located within Parcel 2A of Eastbank Parcel 2 Lot Split in Garfield County, Colorado, as shown on Figure 1. A pumping test for the well was conducted by Resource Engineering, Inc. (RESOURCE) and Ray's Well Done Pump Service, LLC (Ray's) on March 3, 2015 . A water sample from the well was also obtained during the pumping test. The results are presented below. SUMMARY The existing well on the proposed Lot 2 has a val id well permit (Permit No. 50236) issued by the Division of Water Resources. The well permit allows for a 4 ,ODO square foot office/repair shop building, occasional truck washing, fl oar washing, and not more than 1 ,ODO square feet of landscape irrigation. The maximum pumping rate allowed for the well is 15 gallons per minute (gpm), with the an nu al a mount of groundwater to be withdrawn not to exceed 0 .4 acre-feet. The we II has an estimated Ion g-term yie Id of over 20 gpm based on a 4-ho ur pumping test and recovery data. The well water quality data will be available from the laboratory in a few weeks and a separate letter with the results and analysis will be prepared. The well has historically served the potable demands for a small office on the property, landscape irrigation, truck washing, and facility washing. WATER WELL Well Construction The well was constructed in 1967 by an unknown driller. The well is located in a concrete vault structure and is d ri lied approximately 70 feet deep. The we II supplies water to tvvo pressurized storage tanks and th en to the office and maintenance shops. The wel I construction and test report is not available, so no other information on the we II is kn own. The well appears to be drilled in an unconfined alluvial aquifer that is extensive and hydraulically connected to the Roaring Fork River. The current water level elevation in the well is at approximately the same elevation as the Roaring Fork River. The water level in the aquifer fluctuates seasonally, depending on deep percolation from precipitation and irrigation. The water levels are at the I owe st I eve ls during the Viii nter ti me and wil I rise as snow me It occurs and flood irrigation be gins. The pumping test was conducted when the water levels are seasonally at their lowest levels. Therefore, it is anticipated th at the water I eve Is will not significantly drop from their current levels, due to the influence of the Roaring F ark River on the aquifer. Cons-1i-;1n£ 1=ng1neer s a n d Hy:Jr ·ologists 909 C o lo r ci dc Av~riue G l e n wood Sf-lr-in g s , CO 81 '501 • (970 ) 9-1 5-6777 • r oy. (9701 9-1:3-1 " '.37 Page - 82 Nicole Garrimone-Campagna, Esq. Page 2 Pumping Test March 10, 2015 A pumping test was conducted on March 3, 2015, for the well. The purpose of the test was to determine the long-term yield of the well and its adequacy to serve the existing uses (or future uses) for a Garfield County (GARCO) Land Use Application to create a minor subdivision. The initial static water level was measured at 33.35 feet below the top of casing (TOC) as shown on Figure 2. The pumping rate was initially set at approximately 20 gpm to stress the well and the flow rate continued for the entire duration of the test. The well had a total drawdown of 0.28 feet as shown on Figure 3. The final water level at the end of the pumping part of the test was 33.63 feet. The test was terminated after 4 hours of pumping (the minimum pumping test length required in the GARCO regulations) due to the limited drawdown and connection to the Roaring Fork River alluvium described below. Over the 4-hour pumping period approximately 4,800 gallons was pumped, resulting in an average pumping rate of 20 gpm. Analysis Figures 2 and 3 shows the water level in the well dropping minimally during the 4-hour pump test. The water level slowly dropped 0.28 ft. in the first 2 hours and remained relatively steady for the remainder of the test. Based on a total drawdown of only 0.28 feet, and the hydraulic connection to the Roaring Fork River, RESOURCE determined that the pumping test could be terminated after 4 hours. Figure 4 depicts the water level recovery in the vvell in the 5 minutes after pumping ceased. T represents the total time since the pumping test started and T' represents the time since pumping stopped. The vvell reaches complete recovery at TIT' equals more than 2 (8 hr/4 hr), which means the well recovered faster than the rate at which the well was pumped. This indicates that, at the time of the test, the well completely recharged at a rate equal to or more than the 20 gpm average pumping rate. The well is capable of producing more water than the permitted pumping capacity of 15 gpm. Well Location The permitted location for the well is the NW Yi of the SE Yi, of Section 35, Township 6 South, Range 89 West of the 6th P.M. at a point approximately 1700 feet from the south section line and 1950 feet from the east section line. The actual location of the well was located from a site visit using aerial photography. The actual location is approximately 180 feet from the permitted location as shown on Figure 1. The Division of Water Resources requires vvells to be constructed within 200 feet of their permitted location. WATER QUALITY RESOURCE collected one water quality sample from the vvell water during the pumping test. The sample was shipped by overnight delivery under proper chain of custody to National Testing Laboratories. The results will be available in a couple of vveeks. RESOURCE will prepare a letter summarizing the results when the data is available . RESOURCE Page - 83 Page - 84 Background : 2011 Aeria l Photograph II ~~l~R~N~.<2?. ~ColQraQo A--.ie/ QIQnwood Sl)nngia. CO 61601 \loioa. (970J945'3m-Wg;,WW#r880Ulee-9"ge<m Figure 1: Well Location Map Eastbank, LLC 0 1 ,600 ~~~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiil~~~~~~ Feet 400 800 1in=800 ft ·+· Date : 03/1012015 File: 1325-17.1 Draw n : RKM Approv ed : MJE Page - 85 Page - 86 Page - 87 Basalt Water Conservan cy Dist rict Water Allotment Application Page 2 Single family home with landscaping. 3 . Legal description and address of p roperty on which District's water rights and/or contract water will be used (a ttach map and vesting deed with proof of ownership)*: A 16.927 acre parcel of land situated in the south half of Section 35, Township 6 So uth, Range 89 West of the 6th P .M . in Garfield County, Colorado. 4. Elevation of property: __ X __ 6-7,000 ft., ___ 7-8,000 ft., ___ 8-9,000 ft. 5. Nam e and legal description of water supply diversion point(s): Na m e of Diversion : Eastbank Well No. 3. Type of Diversion: Well (e.g., a well, spring, ditch, pipeline, etc.) Legal Description: NE Quarter, SW Quarter, Section 35, Towns hip 6 S, Range 89 W, of the 6 th Principal Meridian, at a location 1,612 feet from the sout h Section line and 1,559 feet from the west Section line . UTM Coordinates (NAD 83/ Zone 13): Northing: 4372906. Easting: 302233. If diversion point is a well, please provide the Well Permit No. Well permit will be obtained once the contract is issued . Is the well operational/active? ___ Yes, ~X~_No Is there currently an operating well meter? ___ Yes, __ X __ 0 Page - 88 Basalt Water Conservan cy D ist r ict W ater Allotment A ppl ication Page 3 Notice: A valid well permit with operating well meter will be required under the contract. 6. Legal Water Supply: (please check one) X Applicant requests consideration b y the District to be included in the District's Umbrella Plan for Augmentation decreed in Case No. 02CW77.* *Note: Certain applicants may qualify to be included in the District's Umbrella Plan at the District's discretion. In order to be included in the District's Umbrella Plan, the Applicant's depletions must occur within the District's defined "Area A" and the Applicant must reimburse the District its pro rata share of the District's expenses in obtaining the Umbrella Plan decree. Costs of reimbursement are contingent upon location and intensity of the uses, and range from $1,200 for con tractees w ith less than 2 units (EQRs) in certain areas, to $5,000 for more than 8 EQRs in Area A-3 (generally the Roaring Fork drainage above its confluence with the Fryingpan Rivers). __ Applicant will obtain its own plan for augmentation by applying to the Water Court, Water Division 5 within 2 years of this application. If Applicant has already applied for its own change/approval of plan for augmentation, the Water Court Case Number is :---------~ 7. Proposed waste water treatment system: (please check) __ Tap to central waste water treatment facility _X_Septic tank/leachfield system __ Evapotranspiration system Other: 8. Proposed use of water (please check) __ X_Domestic/Municipal (single family home(s), duplex(s), condominium(s), mobile home(s), apartment). Please complete page four of this application. __ Commercial (hotel, office, warehouse, restaurant, bar, retail). Please complete page five of this application. Page - 89 Basa lt Water Conservancy District Water Allotment Application Page4 __ Industrial (gravel pit, manufacturing). Please complete page six of this a pp Ii cation. __ Agricu ltural (crop irrigation , stock watering). P lease complete page seven of this a pplication. D ate on w h ich the county or o ther applicable governmental entities approved the land use fo r which you seek legal water service: . (Note: Copy of the Resolu tion of other documentation evidencing such approval should be submitted with application.) 9. What other water rights are associa ted with or used on th e property? None. 10. What o ther uses of water occur on the property? None. Page - 90 Page - 91 Basa lt W ater Co nservancy D istri ct Water Allot ment Appli cation Page 6 Please complete this page if you selected commercial use on Page 3, No. 8 COMMERCIAL WATER USES In-House Hotel: Office(s), square footage : Warehouse/distributor, square footage: _______ _ Retail, square footage: Restaurant, number of seats: ------------ Bar, number of seats: Irrigation (lawns, parks, open space) Total area to be irrigated ____ Sq. Ft. or ____ Acres Type of irrigation system (please check) _____ Sprinkler _____ Flood (irriga tion ditch) Other Commercial Uses Not Liste d: Page - 92 Basalt Water Conservancy District Water Allotment Application Page 7 Please complete this page if you selected industrial use on Page 3, No. 8 INDUSTRIAL WATER USES Please describe your industrial development in some detail: Irrigation (lawns, parks, open space) Total a rea to be irrigated _____ Sq. Ft. or ____ Acres Type of irrigation system (please check) _____ Sprinkler _____ Flood (irrigation d itch) Page - 93 Basalt Water Conservancy District Water Allotment Application Page 8 Please complete this page if you selected agricultural use on Page 3, No. 8. AGRICULTURAL WATER USE Irrigation Type of crop(s) (pasture, alfalfa, beans, etc.) and irrigation system: Crop: Acres: Sprinkler: Flood: Crop: Acres: Sprinkler: Flood: Crop: Acres: Sprinkler: Flood: Crop: Acres: Sprinkler: Flood: Stock Watering (cattle, horses) Number of animals: Months of use: Other agricultural uses not listed: Page - 94 AVf C O S S C o l o r a d o ' s D e c i s i o n S u p p o r t S y s t e m s ' • I ' ~ • 1,169 0 5 8 5 1 , 1 6 9 F e e t 0 1 : 7 , 0 1 6 E a s t b a n k W e l l # 3 " - , ~ ~ , 1 ' 4 ~ ~ a T o w n s h i p s O S e c t i o n s - z . L I I I 1 · · · r · : 1 1 • L . ' \ L L l T h i s p r o d u c t i s f o r i n f o r m a t i o n a l p u r p o s e s a n d m a y n o t h a v e b e e n p r e p a r e d f o r , o r b e s u i t a b ' e f o r l e g a l , e n g i n e e r i n g , o r w r v e y i n g p u r p o s e s U s e r s o f t h i s i n f o r m a t i o n s h o u l d r e v i e w o r c o n s u l t t h e p r i m a r y d a t a a n d i n f o r m a t i o n s o u r c e s t o a s c e r t a i n t h e u s a b i l i t y o f t h e i n f o r m a t i o n . D a t e P r e p a r e d : 2 1 1 6 1 2 0 1 5 1 1 " 2 0 : 4 0 A M Page - 95 I llllll lllll lllll ll Ill 1111 111 111 111111 1111 1111111111 111 6972 52 05 105 /2006 12:32P 81796 P195 M AL SDORF ~ 1 of 3 R 16 00 D 0.00 GARFIE LD COUNTY CO ' BARGAL'< A.';D SALE THIS DEED, made this day of _1<'°1a"'y'-'0-=-3,,_. -'2"'0"'0"'6'---------· betwe<r. COZY POINT, L. P, , A COLORADO LIMIT&D PART?lERSBIP granter, whose street add.r~ss is 3925 COUNTY RO~ 154 GLEKROOO SPRINGS CO 81601 County of ---=-•I::.:TK=I"'N'----' State of __ ....:co=Lo"'R>J>='-'o'----'' for ti1e cons1derauon of Teo Doll= nnd o01cr good nnd valuable conslderntion •••••••Dollars m hand paid, hereby sells and conveys to EASTBANK., LLC, A COLORADO LIMZT &t> L:tABIL.ITY COMPA."f't CJ Jotnt Tm•:"itl 0 T•rrcu ln Ca"'1llOl"t grantee, whose street address is· 1315 SAGE COURT ASPEN, CO 81611 County of _ _,_P=-IT::.;IC:::I:o:.N:._ ____ • SU!te of _ __,c,,,oc::L=o~R>J>=o,___ ___ • the following ,egally descnbed water nghts: Se• Waeer Rights B.xllibie 1 B ' appuneoam to. SE~ ZXRI BI T nA• ATTAaa:D HER•TO A.NI> KADE A PART TilEREOP . Signed as of the day and year fast above wnrteo. CDZY PO.:-.'T L P , A COLORADO U~UTEO PAJlT~'l!RSlllP State of ____ _,co=L:::O"'""'°="------- jss ______ County of PITICIN The foregoing rnstrumeat was acknowledged before me this day of May 03. 2006 By B. JOSBPB ltRABACHER ATTORNEY IN PACT PCR OAllLE:NE M. PRI20LAN Wimess my band and official seal 1 My commission exp1Tes: Ji!Ci<J /<y$ Sl~ Ji.u "'"'j' 1 No Public I• G .. 24!53l Fon 797 02/03/03 \JATER.BS '.I Page - 96 I llllll lllll ll lll ll Il l lllll ll Ill l ll llll lll ll ll l ll ll llll 697252 05 /05 2006 12:32P 81796 Pl96 M RLSDORF 2 of 3 R 16 00 D 0 00 GRRFIELD COUNTY CO EXHIBIT A A ,, t'1Civijel.. i'1teres 1 lS cenanc\' in c0mmo'1 tt) the f ..... : lu'..: .... Pi.!.: A PARCBL OP t.A.ND LOCATCD IN nm S0':.1-rB HALP OF SECTION 3 5, :"Olrt~SHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 89 WEST or r.n: 6TB PRINCIPAL M!:RIDI.A.'l, LYING NORTHERLY M"D EASTERLY OP THE CEh'TER:.IN'B 01 TMB ROARING PORK RIV'BR A.'lD SOtrrHWBSTIRI..Y OP TRE ROARING PORK RA:LROAD ROLODIG AUTHORITY R:CBT OF WAY L:llB A}.1J COLORADO S":'ATB !IIGHWAY 82 RIGHT OP Wl\Y LIN'S MOR3 PARTICULARLY OESCRIBBO AS FOLLOWS: SEGINNI.NG .AT A POINT ON TB:E SOUTH"~ESTERLY RIGHT OP WAY LIN1~ O? COLORADO STATE HIGR'WAY 82, A REBAR ~"D CAP POUND IN PLACB, ~lll:NCE THE SOUTH.EAS~ COR."fER OP SAID SECTION JS, BllING A Jl /4" A:.UMI:ruM C>.P 811.ARS S 37 DEGRE3S 33'42" B 207S.6S P'ERT; TRBNCB S 3 3 DBGRSES 25 1 56 11 W 3 37, 4.2 FllT :'O TH3 CE:NTE:R:.:rsE OP THE ROARING FORK RrvER; TH3NCB ':"KE POLt.OtiiINU 11 COURSES ALONG SAID CENTERLINE OP TKZ ROARING PORK. RIVER; 1. N 72 ::>EGREBS 23 1 29 11 W 716.30 PBET; 2 S 87 DEGRBE:S 57 1 31" W 34.2.00 PEET; J. s es DEGREES 23 1 31" w J42.00 PE8.-, 4.. s 66 :>ZGUBS oe 31' w 517.00 PBETJ S. S 48 OEGilBES 53'31" W 332.00 PEB':'1 6. S 69 DEGREES 55'31" W 363 .CO PEET; 7. N 79 DEGREES Sl'll" W 181.97 PEBT; 8. N 72 DECRBES 04 1 08 11 w 394.82 PEB':'J 9. N 58 DEGR.a:BS 38 1 29 11 W :0.98.91 FRET; 10. N 33 DEGRB!!:S 4.2 1 29 11 W 445.43 FEB':'; 11. N 24 DEGREES 30'30" w 284.67 PEZT TO TH.B WESTERLY LINE or SAID SECTION 35; TKENCE N 08 OS:GREES 45 •43• B 726.25 PEST ALONG SAID ft"ESTER!.Y L~ TO THE CD"'TERLIN OP SAID RIVXRJ THENCB N 37 :>RCRBES 51' 14 11 E 155 . 85 FEET ALONG SAID CENTER.LINB1 TH3NCJi: N 42 DBGREES 52' 31" B 315. 63 PBET A:.ONG SAID CENTERLL~; TH.BNCE N 01 DEGREES SS ' s2• K 68. 77 PEBT ALONG SAID CENTERL!N'E ':'C '!'KE NORTP.EH:.Y L INZ OP SA.I:> SOUTH HA.LP or SAm S&CTION 35 ; THENCE s 89 DEGREES 54•21• g 168l.30 P'IET ALO NG SAID NOR:"ll"BRLY Lnra TO THE SOUTHWBS-:BRLY RIGS-: OP WAY ~:Sll OP TRE ROARING FOP..K RAILROAD KOL~ING AIJTHORITY J THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTKWEST1!RLY R!GHT or l<AY Lll!E A~ONG A 110N -TANG!:NT CURVJJ TO Tllll LEFT RAVING A RADIUS OF 1960.00 PEBT, A CEliTRAL ANGLE OF 20 OEGRESS 01'23", AN ARC DISTANCE OP 6BL96 nn. ANO A ~ONG CHORD OP s 46 OBGRE2S 02'2(" E 681.48 PllBT; TKBNCE S 56 DBGREBS 03'05" B llt .44 PERT ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY :.nra TO ':'"n"E SOtr:"KWBS7BRLY ~IGH":.' or WAY L:Nll OP COLOR.ADO STAT!. M:XG!nfAY •• TH'BNCB S 4 0 DB CORE ES 4.8. 4.0" B 232. 4.1 f'EZT ALONG SA.XO SOUTHW"'SSTKRLY t.:N'E; THENCE S 46 OBGREES 55 I 22 It • 304.80 PEBT ALONG SAI!l SOUTH"l'fESTBRLY L1'Nli:1 TKBN'CE S Sl DBGREES 02 I 19 11 B lll. 93 FEB':' ALONG SAID SOU':IDraSTl!:RLY LISE1 THBNC2 S S4 DBGRE!S )QI 4Q• B 186.78 PER':' ALONG SAID SOU:"HW!:STERLY LINE: TKBNC£ S SS OBGREES Sl 1 4!P E 181. 6l PEET ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LI.NE1 THENCE S S7 OKGRESS 02' is• g 90 .41 PEET >.:.ONG SAID SOUTBWRS':'ERLY LI~"B TO THB POINT O!' BEGTh"NI.NG. CO~'TY OP GA.Rl'IBL:> STATB O? COLORADO C'oo2t.&533 cor'TJI 42!1, .. 30 0:1n!ln>.• :1111.1:1 Page - 97 I lll lll ll lll ll lllll Il l lllll ll Ill llllll l Ill ll lll llll lll l 697252 es es 2006 l2 :32P Bl796 Pl97 M ALSOORF 3 of 3 R 16 00 0 0 ee GARFIELD COUNTY CO W.-\TER RJGnTS EXHIBIT "B"' r..jll Ci 0 €01 11 11 i llJ ! llf h!J Ii" EI L(J!U~ A_" L"IDIYlllEO T\\'ENTY-SE\'E'.\ PERCE!'iT (27%) fNTEREST 1:-i A.'\0 TO A:\Y WATl!.R RJGBTS, BOTH TRJBL'TARY AKO :>;0:'.1:-TRIBUTARY, \\ HETHER ADJUDICATED OR U:VADJl,'DICATED, MD ALL DITCn AND DITCn RlGHTS, WATER \\'ELLS A..'D \\ELL RJGH I S, STATE ~.'\GJ:'>l:.l:.R FILL'\(,~. WELL REGISTRATIO:-. S'IATE'.\IBNTS ASD WELL PER.\IITS, AD J l.DICATED A'.'ID CNADJl.l)ICATED SPRl:'\GS, RESUn'OlRS AXD RESER\'Offi RJGllTS, ror-ms A.'iD PO'.\D RIGHTS, HISTORJCA1-LY L~l:.IJ t;PO!'/ OR APPCRTE:'IA'."T TO THE PROPERTY. A.'\'D ALL PC:RSOi\ \I. PROPERTY SUCH AS WFLL EQUIP'.IIB •T, FITTIJ\GS, CASf'<GS A!\D lRRIGATION EQt:IP'.lfENT t:SED DI CO'.\':'<l:CllO!'. \\ITH SAID \\ATFR RIGHTS A.'1) WELLS. GWSZ48533 Page - 98 iiiii R E SOURCE ===== e N G I N e e R 1 N G I N c . Memorandum To: From: CC: Date: File: BWCD BOARD OF DIRECTORS ERIC MANGEOT if CHRIS GEIGER c._ n / FEBRUARY 19, 2015 APPLICATION-EASTBANK, LLC Applicant Name: Eastbank, LLC Type of Use: Domestic _X_ Industrial Commercial Agricultural __ Amount Location: Area A _M_ Area B Inclusion County: GARFIELD Contiguous: __ BWCD Division : _1_ Mid Valley Metro District Notice Required? Blue Creek Water Rights Applied? Yes __ No_2L Yes_ No_x_ Resource Engineering, Inc. 909 Colorado Avenue Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 (970)-945-6777 Voice (970)-945-1137 Facsimile 02CW77 Umbrella Plan Water Rights Applied? Yes_2L No __ Cost: $1.200 This application is to cover depletions associated with a single family dwelling and 17,000 square feet of lawn and landscape irrigation for a proposed lot to be located within a portion of "Parcel 2A" as set forth on certain "Eastbank Parcel 2 Lot Split" plat recorded on January 19, 2012 as Reception No. 813402 and situated in the south half of Section 35, Township 6 South, Range 89 West of the 6111 P.M. in Garfield County, Colorado (Parcel No. 218535304001). Total depletions are 1.0 acre-feet (AF) as estimated by Resource Engineering, Inc. The property in owned by Eastbank, LLC (Applicant) and is located in Division 1 of the District. Diversions are to be from a proposed well to be located in the NE1/4 SW1/4 of Section 35, Township 6 South, Range 85 West, of the Siil P.M . a t a point 1,612 feet from the South section line and 1,559 feet from the West section line. A copy of the water requirement table is attached along with a BWCD map showing the location of the property. Page - 99 Wa t e r Us e r : An a l v s l s Da t e : Di s t r i ct Ar e a : So u r c e Se r l e s : M ax i m u m De m a n d : (1 ) Do m e s t i c Mo n t h In -ho u s e Ja n u a r y 0 .03 3 Fe b ru a r y 0 .03 0 Ma r c h 0. 0 3 3 Ap r i l 0 .03 2 Ma y 0 .03 3 Ju n e 0 .03 2 Ju l y 0 .03 3 A ug us t 0 .03 3 Se p t e m b e r 0 .03 2 Oc t o b e r 0 .03 3 No v e m b e r 0 .0 32 De c e m b e r 0 .03 3 TO T AL S - > 0 .39 2 (1 ) (2 ) (3 ) (4 ) Ea s t b a n k , LL C F eb r u a r v 19 , 2 01 5 A 4 15 0 .03 3 (G P M ) (C F S ) To t a l De m a n d (2 ) ( 3 ) (4 ) Co m m e r c i a l La w n C ro p BA S A L T WA T E R CO N S E R V A N C Y DI ST R I C T WA T E R RE Q U I R E M E N T S (a c r e fe e t ) (5 ) (6 ) (7 ) (8 ) Do m e s t ic Co m m e r c i a l Co n s u m c l l v e Us e (9 ) (10 ) (11 ) La w n Cr o p or Ot h e r lr r i a a t i o n lr r i a a t l o n Li v e s t o c k TO T A L In - h o u s e or Ot h e r lr r i a a t l o n lr r i a a t l o n Li v e s t o c k 0 .00 0 0 .00 0 0. 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 00 3 3 0 .00 0 0. 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0. 0 3 0 0. 00 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0. 0 00 0. 0 3 3 0 .00 0 0 .04 8 0. 0 0 0 0 .00 0 0 .08 1 0 .00 0 0 .19 6 0. 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0. 2 2 9 0. 0 0 0 0 .23 8 0. 0 0 0 0 .00 0 0. 2 7 0 0 .00 0 0 .22 9 0 .00 0 0 .00 0 0. 2 6 3 0 .00 0 0 .14 2 0. 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0. 1 7 5 0 .00 0 0. 1 2 9 0. 0 0 0 0 .00 0 01 6 1 0 .00 0 0 .05 2 0. 0 0 0 0 .00 0 0. 0 8 6 0. 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0. 0 3 2 0. 00 0 0 .0 00 0. 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 03 3 0 .00 0 1 . 03 4 0. 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 1 4 26 As s u m c t l o n s NU M B E R OF RE S I D E N C E S 1 # pe rs o n s/ r e s i d e nc e 3 .5 # ga l l o n s / p e r s o n / da y 10 0 Co mm e r ci a V O l he r De m a n d (a l ) 0. 0 0 0 Of f i c e S q . F t. o f La w n Ir r i g a t e d 17 ,00 0 L aw n Ap p l i c a t i o n R a t e (a f l a c ) 2. 6 9 6 Ac r e s o f C ro p Ir r i g a t e d 0 .0 0 Cr o p Ao o l i c a t l o n Ra t e (a f / a c ) 0 .00 0 0 .0 0 5 0. 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 .00 0 0 .00 5 0. 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 .00 0 0. 0 0 5 0. 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 .00 0 0 .00 5 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 39 0 .0 0 0 0. 0 0 5 0 .00 0 0 .1 57 0. 0 0 0 0. 0 0 5 0. 0 0 0 0 .19 0 0 .00 0 0 .00 5 0 .00 0 0 .18 3 0. 0 0 0 0 .00 5 0 .00 0 0 .11 3 0 .0 0 0 0. 0 0 5 0 .00 0 0 .10 3 0 .00 0 0 .00 5 0 .00 0 0. 0 4 2 0 .00 0 0. 0 0 5 0 .00 0 0. 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 .00 5 0 .00 0 0 .00 0 0. 0 0 0 0. 05 9 0 .00 0 0. 8 2 7 0 .00 0 (5 ) # o f Li v e s t o c k ta l 11 ga l s / d a y (7 ) % C U fo r Do m e s t i c / C o m m e r c i a l (9 ) 0 .4 La w n lr r i g . Ef f i ci e n c y Co n s u mp t i o n of lr r i g . (a f l ac ) (1 0 ) % C ro p lr r i g . Ef f i c i e n c y Co n s u m p t i o n o f lr r i g . (a fl a c ) (9 - 1 0 ) El e v a t i o n (f e e t ) "( 1 2) , (1 3) To t a l In c l u d e s 5% Tr a n s i t L os s 10 % fr om Gr e e n Mi n . 0 .00 0 0 .00 0 0 .00 0 0 .00 0 0 .00 0 0. 0 0 0 0 .00 0 0 .00 0 0 .00 0 0 .00 0 0. 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 15 80 2. 1 5 7 80 0 .00 0 59 4 0 "( 1 2 ) . (13 ) (13) De l a ye d Sou rce of TO T A L De pl el 1 o n s AuaJRec l ace 0. 0 0 5 0 .05 6 GNM 0. 0 0 5 0. 0 5 6 GNM 0. 0 0 5 0 .05 6 GNM 0 .04 8 0 .06 0 GNM 0. 1 7 8 0 .10 5 GNM 0. 2 1 5 0 .13 1 GNM 0. 2 0 7 0 .12 9 GNM 0 .13 0 0 .10 5 GNM 0. 1 1 9 0 .09 7 GNM 0. 0 5 2 0 .06 8 GNM 0 .0 0 5 0 .05 7 GNM 0. 0 0 5 0 .05 6 GNM 0. 9 7 4 0. 9 7 4 Ar e a A- 4 We l l Ty p e A Al l u v i a l We l l To Be Dr i l l e d Ro a r i n g Fo r k Ri v e r Page - 100 .... '"' "'' , .. \ Figure 1: Eastbank, LLC n., Q.J.l-7..Z ON. 07/11/15 \ Basalt Water Conservancy District --==--~~~~~~~~~==-----J ~ 2000 l OOO Scale: 1"s2 ,000' ..!.... -... RESOURCE ENGINEERING, INC. (t'70)~~~.,, ..s-1137 r__. Page - 101 COLORADO DMSION OF WATER RESOURCES Office Use Only I Form GWS-44 (7/2012) DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 1313 SHERMAN ST., Ste 821, DENVER, CO 80203 Main : <303l 866-3581 Fax: (3031865-2223 dwrnermitsonllnet11ls tate.co.us RESIDENTIAL Nole: Also use this form to apply fo r livestock watering Water Well Permit Application Review f o rm Instructions prior t o completing form. Hand completed forms must be completed In black or blue Ink or typed. 1. Aoollcant Information Name{s) --~Use Of Well (check applicable boxes) . Eastbank, LLC See instructions to determine use(s) for which you may qualify 0 A. Ordina~ household use in one single-fami ly dwelling MaUing address (no o side use) 710 East D urant Ave., Unit W-6 -··----• B. Ordinary household use in 1 to 3 single-family dwellings : ;~~en ----·--·-Td;" 1. Zip code Number of dwellings: 1 8161 1 Telephone (wlarea code) I E~mall • Home garden/lawn irrigation, not to exceed one acre: 970-925-9046 rmac@dunrene.com area irrigated 17000 !&" sq. ft. P acre 2. Type Of Applicatio n (check applicable boxes) 0 Domestic animal watering -(non-commerciaQ • Construct new well O Change source (aquifer) D C . Livestock watering (on farm/ranch/range/pasture) 0 Replace existing well 0 Reapplication (expired permit) 7. Well Data (proposed) 0 Use existing well 0 Rooftop precip . collection D Cham:ie or increase use D other: Maxirrum pun..,ing rate Annual amount to be withdra'Ml 15 gpm 1.0 acre-feet 3. Refer To (if applicable) Tolal deplh Aquifer WelperlTit# Waler Court case I 100 feet 02CW77 Designated Basin Determination II Wei name or# 8. Water Supplier Is this parcel within boundaries of a water service area?O YES!m NO 4. Location Of Proposed Well (Important! See In structions) If ves , provide name of supplier: County 11•orthe SW 9. Type Of Sewage System Garfi eld NE 114 Section 1 ~°""5tip N ors Range EorW Principal Meridian Ill Septic tank I absorption leach field 35 11 [If 89 a llil ,6th O Central system: District name: Distance of wel from section lines (section Ines are typicaly not prnperty lines) D Vault: Location sewage to be hauled to: 1612 Ft.from r N (X S 1559 Ft. ~om c E l&lW 0 Other (explain) For replaeemenl wells onty-distance and direction from old well to new well feet Direction 10. Prooosed Well Driller License #(optional): WeJ location address {lndude City, Stale. Zip) LJ Check if well address Is same as in Hem 1. 11. S ign o r Enter Name of Appllcant(s) or Authorized Agent The making of false statements herein constitutes perjury in the second degree, which is punishable as a class 1 misdemeanor pursuant to C.R.S. Optional : GPS well location Information In UTM fomiat GPS unit settings are as folows; 24-4-104 (13)(a). I have read the statements herein, know the contents thereof and state that thev are true to mv knov.1edae. Format rrust be UTM Sign or enter ntme(s) of~$) slmrrininn application I ~/~ D Zone 12 "'100 Zorie 13 Easting : 302233 /~~ Units must be Meters Datum must be NAD13 Northing: 4372906 Unit rTIU$1 be set to true north Remember to set Datum to NAD83 H slg.,ngprlnt narM and~tte '"~-!) -;:r. ~~-\. .~~ A.~5 Was GPS IMlit checked f or above? 0 YES 1!'~ v~ tt-~ QoM..'-\: ~--~.~.,.e~ ..... ~.tct. 5. Parcel On Which Well Will Be Located Office Use Only . , -.. -. I Yo u must attach a current deed for the sublect narcel) UsGs map name ---·-I OWR map no. I S..rface etev. A . You must check and complete one oflhe following: • Subdivisi on: Name Eastbank, LLC Minor Subdiv ision Receipt area only Lot 3 Block Fil ing/Unit ____ 0 County exemption (attach copy of county approval & survey) Name/# Lot# 0 Parcel less than 35 acres, not in a subdivision attach a deed with metes 0 & bounds description recorded prior to June 1 , 1972, and current deed Mining claim (attach copy of deed or survey) Name/#: 0 Square 40 acre parcel as described In Item 4 0 Parcel of 35 or more acres (attach metes & bounds description or survey) AQUAMAP 0 Other: (attach metes & bounds description or survey) WE B . •of aaes Jn p•oel I C. Ale you the mi.ner of this parcel? WR 16 ll!I YESO NO CWCB D. Wil this be the onry wel on this parcel? ~ YES DJ NO (if no -l!at other wens) TOPO E . State Parcel I D# (optional)· MYLAR SBS DIV --WO --BA --MD -- Page - 102 COLORADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES GWs-44 RESINST (712012) DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES RESIDENTIAL WELL PERMIT APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS Appllcatlons must be computer generated onllne, typewritten, or printed In BLACK or BLUE INK. ALL ITEMS In the appllcatJon must be completed. Incomplete appllcatlons may be nitumed for more infonnation. Applications are evaluated in chronological order. Please allow approximately six _. for processing. This form may be reproduced by photocopying. Reproductions must retain margins and print quality of the original form. If flllng onllne see online filing instructional You may also save, print, scan and email the completed form to: dwrpermitsonline@state.co.us DO NOT use this fonn for the registration of an existing well In use prior to May 8, 1972; (use Form GWS-12). FEES: This application must be submitted with the appropriate 1Hlng fee. The filing fee for applications is $100. Exceptions are as follows: 1) An application to replace or deepen an existing permitted well that is in the same source (aquifer) which does not have a "-F" or "-R" suffix after the original permit number is $60. 2) Applications to register an existing well (use Form GWS-12), and replace or deepen the well (use Form GWS-44) into the same aquifer is $100 if submitted together. F-are nonrefundable. Acceptable forms of payment are check or money order, payable to the Colorado Division of Water Resources . Payment by Visa, MasterCard or Discover cards can be accepted by phone through the Records Office at 303.866.3581. USES: This form (GWS-44) is to be used when applying for a permit for the following types of uses: A. Ordinary household use Inside one slngle-famlly dwelllng (NO outside water use allowvd): Generally, this is all that can be approved on parcels less than 35 acres. B. Ordinary household use in 1 to 3 single-family dwellings, Irrigation of up to one acre of home garden and lawn, and watering of domestic animals: Generally, permits can be approved on parcels of land of 35 or more acres, or in areas inside the Designated Basins, the Denver Basin, limited areas on the Western Slope, and for subdivisions under a court- approved plan for augmentation that allow outside uses. C. Livestock watering on fann, ranch, range, or pasture (on parcels of 35 or more acres). ITEM INSTRUCTIONS: (numbers correspond with those on the front of this fonnl 1. The applicant is the entity for whom the permit is to be issued. Since the well owner is ultimately responsible for the use of the well, their name should be in this area. The mailing address is where the applicant currently receives mail. 2. Check all boxes that apply. If you check the box for Rooftop preclp. collectlon, you must also complete and submit Fonn No.GWS-78. 3. Complete all boxes that apply. 4. You must provide a \11911 spot location under the following circumstances: (•) the location Is decreed by a water court; (b) the well will be inside the Denver Basin or other location where a site- specific well depth restriction wlll apply: (c) your application is for a permit to use an existing well. When a spot location is required, you must provide the county, Y. of the Y. section designation (example: NEY. of the SEY.), section#, township, range, principal meridian, and either distances from section lines or a GPS location (UTM coordinates). If providing a GPS location, the reql.ired GPS unit settings must be as indicated on this form. Colorado contains two UTM zones (12 & 13). Zone 13 covers most of Colorado. T he boundary between Zone 12 and Zone 13 is the 108th Meridian (longitude). West of the 108., Meridian is UTM Zone 12 and east of the 1081" Meridian Is UTM Zone 13. The 1 OBth Meridian is approximately 57 miles east of the Colorado- Utah state line. On most GPS units, the UTM zone is given as part of the Easting measurement, e.g. 12T0123456. Check the appropriate box for the zone. For all other appllcants, you must provide the following minimum infonnation: (a) the county, section #, township, range and principal meri dian ; and, (b) the subdivision lot, block & filing/unit designations as applicable if in a subdivision. You do not need to provide distances from section lines or a GPS location (UTM coordinates). Provide the property address of the well location if one exists. If it is the same as the mailing address, check the box next to the well location address. 5. A current deed for the sublect parcel must be attached. If the subject parcel is 35 or more acres, a complete metes and bounds type legal description or surveyor's plat map that references a section point is required to enable us to plot the parcel in our mapping system. If the parcel is less than 35 acres and not in a subdivision, a deed with metes and bounds legal description, recorded prior to June 1, 1972 ls required. Complete Items 5A through 5E (5E is optional). If you answered NO to Item 5C please indicate who the landowner is. If you are under a contract to purchase the subject property, please state this as well. If the parcel is inside the Denver Basin, the application must be in the name of and signed by, or their name entered by, the current landowner. If filing online please see online filing instructions for how to submit deed and or legal description attachments. 6. See above comments under USES to determine those uses for which you may qualify, and then check the applicable box or boxes. 7. The maximum pumping rate is limited to 15 gpm for most residential type well permits. The annual amount of water to be withdrawn is a volume measured in acre-feet. One aae-foot equals 325,851 gallons. For ordinary household use inside one single-family dwelling and no outside use, the annual amount will be about 113 acre-foot. For ordinary household use in three single-family dwellings, one acre of home garden/lawn irrigation, and watering of domestic animals, the annual amount will be about 3 aae-feet. For 100 head of livestock, the annual amount will be about 1.35 acre-feet. Please indicate the estimated depth of the proposed well. The proposed aquifer for the well must be indicated if the well is to be located within the Denver Basin (the approximate area of the Denver Basin extends south from Greeley to an area east of Colorado Springs and from Golden east to Limon), the San Luis Valley, the Southern High Plains basin in Baca or Prowers Counties, or in areas where it is believed the well will penetrate a confining layer. Aquifer information should be provided if known , for well locations outside of these areas. 8. The issuance of well permits may depend on the availability of another source of water, pursuant to CRS 37-92-602(6), such as water from a municipality or water district. (Statutes can be accessed through the CD\11/R web site.) 9. Check the applicable box, and complete or attach any additional information as requested in this item. 10. Wells must be constructed by a Colorado licensed well driller, or under the "private driller" provision as defined in CRS 37-91- 102(12). A fi sting of licensed well drillers/pump installers is available at http://water.state.co.us/groundwater/BOE/Paoes/LicensedContract ors.aspx 11. The individual signing the application or entering their name (and title If applicable) must be the applicant or an officer of the corporation/company/agency ldenUfied as the applicant or their attorney. An authorized agent may also sign or enter their name on the application if a letter signed by the applicant or their attorney is submitted with the application authorizing that agent to sign or enter their name on the applicant's behalf. Payment must be received via phone If filing online at 303.866.3581 (Records Office) prior to processing the application. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS please call the Colo. Division of Water Resources (303-866-3581), or the nearest Division Field Office in Greeley (970-352-8712), Pueblo (719-542-3368), Alamosa (719-589-6683), Montrose (970.249-6622), Glenwood Springs (970-945-5665), Steamboat Springs (970.879-0272), or Durango (970-247-1845), or refer to the CDWR web site at htlp:/lwww.water.state.co.us for general information, additional fonns, and access to state rules or statutes. Page - 103 Vicinity Map The 38.2-acre property is east of Highway 82 at the intersection of County Road 154. Subject Property Page - 104 Pre-Application Conference Summary Major Impact Review Page - 105 II. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS A limited impact review requires the following information to be submitted pursuant to Table 4-201 which includes the following items which are further described in Section 4-203. • 4-203 .B. General Application Materials • • • • • • • • a. Application Form and Fee b. Agreement to p;:iy form c. Deed d. Statement of Authority(ies) and/or letter of authorization(s). Note: Several documents would be need to demonstrate that Farrar and Mcconaughy have the ability to file an application and act on behalf of the property owner. 1) Statement of Authority indicating who has the authority to sign for Eastbank LLC, 2) Letter of Authorization authorizing KiemanWest,LLC to act on behalf of Eastbank LLC, 3) Statement of Authorization indicating who has authority to sign for KiernanWest, LLC, 4) Letter of Authorization authorizing Western Slope Consulting, LLC {Farrar) and Mcconaughy to act on behalf of KiernanWest, LLC, 5) Statement of Authorization authorizing Farrar to sign on behalf of Western Slope Consulting, LLC. e. List of m ineral owners of record, including names and mailing addr esses f. Names and mailing addresses of all property owners within 200 feet of the subject parcel. g. A map showing the subject parcel and the adjacent property owners. h. Project narrative i. Copy of pre-application conference summary 4-203.C. Vicinity Map 4-203.D. Site Plan 4-203.E. Grading and Drainage Plan 4-203.G. Impact An alysis 4-203. J. Development Agreement. If applicable . 4-203.K. Improvement Agreement. If applicable • 4-203.L Traffic Study Note: Based on an estimated 230 ADT, this will likely only require a basic traffic study. A detailed analysis is required if traffic generated meets o r exceed 20% of t he existing volume. Also, to demonstrate compliance with section 7-107, you will need to show the route that traffic will take to access the si te and a P.E. should provide information that the roadways are adequate to handle the increased capacity generated by the proposed use. Contact with the Garfield County Road and Bridge Dept as well as COOT is encouraged prior to submittal of the application to obtain feedback on any Improvements or permitting which may be necessary to accommodate the use based on anticipat ed ADT. 4-2 03. M. Water Supply/Distribution Plan Note: Demonstrate legal and physical water related to the well. This requires submittal of a well permit that indicates the water can be used for commercial purposes, pump testing for quantity and water testing for quality analysis. This may constitute a public water supply p ursuant to state statutes which requires permitting from Co lorado Department of Public Health and Environment ( CD PH E). Contact with t he Division of Water Resources and CDPH E prior to submittal of the application is encouraged to obtain feedback on any necessary permitting/re-permitting requirements. 2 Page - 106 • 4-203.N. Wastewater Treatment Plan Note: Demonstrate that the septic system will be constructed that is adequate to serve the faci li ty. CDPHE permitting may be required. Percolation tests prior to submittal are required. • Section 7, Divisions 1, 2 and 3. Respond to all standards in this section and submit any additional material (reports, plans, studies, etc) that provides evidence of compliance. As the property is within the City of Glenwood Springs Urban Growth Area, the development will need to show compliance with the City of Glenwood Springs Comprehensive Plan. • Section 7-1001. Respond to all standards in this section and submit any additional material (reports, plans, studies, etc) that provides evidence of compliance. Note: Section 7-102 requires general conformity with the Garfield County Comprehensive Plan 2030. This property falls within the Residential Medium Density designation within the plan. Applicant should review and analyze other components of the Plan and demonstrate general conformance with the goals and objectives of the County. Note: Section 7-107 requires demonstration of legal access. Please ensure that an application permit or a permit has been issued for the driveway(s) located off of the County Road. IV. REVIEW PROCESS The process to accommodate these requests shall require a Major Impact Rev iew process (4-1 05) pursuant to the Land Use and Deve lopment Code, as amended. A. Pre-application Conference. B. Application Submittal. C. Determination of Completeness. (20 days for staff review, 60 days for applicant to correct any deficiencies in the submittal) D. Schedule Public Hearing with PC, provide documentation regarding notice requirements in order to satisfy LUDC requirement of minimum 30 day/maximum 60 day notice prior to hearing. E. Additional Copies requested and sent to referral agencies. F. Evaluation by Director/Staff resulting in a Staff Report to the Board of County Commissioners. G. Public Hearing before the PC, resulting in a recommendation of final approval, approval with conditions or denial. H. Schedule Public Hearing with BOCC, provide documentation regarding notice requirements in order to satisfy LUDC requirement of minimum 30 day/maximum 60 day notice prior to hearing. I. Public Hearing before the BOCC, resulting in a decision of final approval, approval with conditions or denial. J. Record ing of decision in an approved Resolution K. If approved, Issuance of a Land Use Change Permit based on demonstration of compliance with any conditions of approval. 3 Page - 107 V. PUBLIC HEARIN GS AND NOTICE Public Hearing notices shall be posted, mailed and published at least 30 days prior to the hearing pursuant to Section 4-101.E. ~-None -~-Planning Commission ~~-Board of County Commissioners Vi. REFFERALS Referral may include the followlng agencies: • Garfield County Road and Bridge Department • Garfield County Environmental Health Manager • Garfield County Vegetation Manager • Garfield County Consulting Engineer • Fire Protection Districts • • • • • Colorado Division of Water Resources City of Glenwood Springs Colorado Department of Transportation Roaring Fork Transportation Authority Any other agency deemed appropriate upon review of the submittal VII . APPLICATION REVIEW FEES This application wiil be subject to the followlng fees and deposit requirements: Planning Review Fees : Referral Agency Fees: Total Deposit: $ 525 Plus any additional Staff time charged at staff hourly rate of $40.50 Engineering review fee based on hourly rate $525 C~o.ei:a LAP.P.I l$:a.tLQo..fl:o_ces.slng Planner reviews case for completeness and sends to referral agencies for comments. Case planner contacts applicant and sets up a site visit. Staff reviews application to determine If It meets standards of review. Case planner makes a r ecommendation of approval, approval with conditions, or denial to the appropriate hearing body. DJs_cl<1lmet The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the County. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change In the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. This summary does not create a legal or vested right. This summary is valid for 6 months following the signature date. 11e~<1p.p.llccttlon.S_ummai:y..fte1>.<1r:.e~:y; ~.:/~~ C r;>avid Pesnichak, AICP · Senior Planner Q.e~ernb_eui,A0.1..4JUp.d.a.te~) Date 4 Page - 108 Site Plan - A detailed scaled 24”x36” Development Site Plan is included with this application under separate cover. This smaller site plan image shows how the proposed FedEx facility lies on the property. Page - 109 Relationship to Glenwood Springs Comprehensive Plan - Future Land Use Subject Property Page - 110 Relevant Sections of the Glenwood Springs Comprehensive Plan Industrial This designation accommodates heavy commercial, light industrial and industrial uses such as manufacturing, warehousing and distributing, indoor and outdoor storage. Applicant Comment. The proposed facility is a light industrial shipping and distribution operation that delivers a valuable community benefit including jobs, new construction, assessed value and other benefits for Garfield County. Land Uses Outside City Limits but within the Urban Growth Area Future land use designations have been applied to properties within the Urban Growth Area. It is intended that these properties within the Urban Growth Boundary be annexed into the city at some point in the future. Among other things, these future land use designations take into account current uses, topographic constraints, existing/future utility connections, existing road networks, and land uses on adjacent properties.” Applicant Comment. The property lies within the Glenwood Springs Urban Growth Boundary. There are existing industrial uses on the north and south (MRI and Orison Distributing). The County regulations allow Warehouse and Distribution Centers as a Major Impact Review at this location and this is a logical and compatible use of this site. The property has good county road and state highway access. The flat upper portion of the property does not have topographic constraints. Promote Sustainable Economic Diversity Maintain Glenwood’s Role as a Regional Center To minimize the historic boom and bust economic cycles of western Colorado, efforts must be undertaken to continue to diversify the local economy. The City should build on existing assets. Therefore, community strengths and assets should be considered while determining the appropriate mix and type of businesses and industries that would be attracted to Glenwood Springs. Quality of life, quality infrastructure and an educated and qualified workforce are keys to attracting quality businesses and employment opportunities. Applicant Comment. Construction of this facility offers an important service to Garfield County and the Glenwood Springs area. It adds to the area’s economic diversity and business mix. The operation will generate new construction, employment, assessed valuation and other economic benefits to the County. Federal Express is a quality business that will serve Garfield County, Glenwood Springs and the region well. Infrastructure The City is required to provide annexed parcels with infrastructure (electricity, water, wastewater) and services (police, emergency and other urban services) in a manner that is cost- effective and that does not unduly burden Glenwood Springs' residents. Applicant Comment. There are no municipal utility services near the property. Utilities may be extended to the adjoining parcel that is owned by the Re-1 School District, but the timing of any utility extension is unknown. The facility will require minimal services and will generate substantial commercial assessed valuation with the corresponding property tax benefit. Page - 111 Other Goals & Policies from the Glenwood Springs Comprehensive Plan Pertinent to the Application. City must work to further diversify its economy in order to minimize the impacts of boom and bust cycles. While taking steps to continue diversifying the economy, the City should focus efforts on attracting high-paying jobs to help offset the abundance of low-paying jobs associated with the robust tourism and service industry. Community Goals Supported by Economic Development • Maintain Glenwood’s role as a regional center Policies to Enhance Economic Development • The City should encourage the development of a well-trained workforce. • The City should continue to make improvements that enhance the community’s quality of life and that make Glenwood Springs a place that is attractive for new businesses and their employees. • The City should actively pursue businesses and industries whose operations and products are compatible with the Glenwood Springs vision. Strategies and Actions to Promote Economic Development Attract Diverse Businesses and Industries. The City should diversify the economy in at least three major ways: creating a community where employers/employees want to live, creating opportunity for new and expanding local businesses, and actively seeking targeted businesses. Allocate Adequate Land Adequate land for new industries and businesses is limited within city limits. However, what is available will need to be zoned to allow a business easy development. The City should consider revising the zoning code to allow for more flexibility of uses for a structure or site in order to better respond to the industrial and commercial real estate market. Options immediately adjacent to the city limits and within the Urban Growth Boundary should also be examined for the ability to accommodate business and industry. Page - 112 Existing County Zoning Existing zoning for the property is Garfield County Rural (R). Rural zoning allows “warehouse and distribution center” as a major impact review. Subject Property Page - 113 General Conformity with Garfield County Comprehensive Plan Applicable sections from the Garfield County Comprehensive Plan. Growth in Urban Growth Areas The Plan recognizes the need for existing municipalities to be able to gradually expand into immediately surrounding areas. The county supports and encourages orderly expansion of existing communities. This Plan recognizes existing municipal plans and strongly supports and encourages infill and redevelopment of existing communities. These growth areas are the preferred locations in Garfield County for growth that require urban level services. They are also the preferred locations for commercial and employment uses that can take advantage of supporting infrastructure and a close by client base that reduces travel demands. The most effective way to encourage growth in designated and planned UGAs will be by ensuring the following: i. Each municipality’s plan for its UGA is incorporated into the Garfield County Comprehensive Plan. ii. Urban developments in the UGAs are encouraged to annex into the respective municipality. iii. If there is a public benefit to allowing development within a UGA prior to annexation, the County and municipality will cooperatively endeavor to facilitate such development through such means as: County zoning in the UGAs adjusted to a close approximation of the municipality’s plans. Development in the UGA is required to obtain a local review with comment (not approval) before submitting for county review. A procedure for municipal/county review and recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners will be developed in an IGA with each community. Each community is expected to extend services and infrastructure to development in the UGA that substantially complies with their plan for the UGA (landowners and the respective municipality are strongly encouraged to enter into pre-annexation agreements that provide commitments with respect to extensions of services and infrastructure, densities, etc.). Page - 114 Section 1 - Urban Growth Areas and Intergovernmental Coordination Vision Garfield County has worked with municipalities to direct development to UGAs where public services and infrastructure are provided in an efficient and cost-effective manner. Intergovernmental cooperation between municipalities and other public agencies has demonstrated successful collaboration and has resulted in the creation of new partnerships and collaborative efforts on behalf of the residents of the county. Issues: There is widespread support in the public for encouraging a significant portion of future growth to occur in and adjacent to municipalities. Applicant Comment. This project is located within Glenwood Springs’ Urban Growth Area, but is some distance south of the municipal boundary. This location was selected after considerable time and dollars were expended working with both Glenwood Springs and Garfield County on a location adjacent to the Glenwood Springs airport. Although Garfield County ultimately approved a limited impact review application at the airport site, a number of issues were raised about roadway impacts in Glenwood Springs. In response to those concerns, the applicant investigated a variety of other properties and ultimately found the proposed site. This location is away from residential development, has excellent access to County Road 154 and State Highway 82 and is located adjacent to other light industrial uses. The FedEx Ground facility is a needed and desired use in Garfield County. The applicant is continuing to work with the County and the City to ensure that this site is properly developed and fits within the spirit and vision of both entities’ planning documents. A municipality’s UGA is actually under county jurisdiction but development here can greatly impact city plans. County land use decisions, particularly those immediately adjacent to municipal boundaries, have been viewed by local communities, in some cases, as not being compatible and making orderly expansion difficult. Applicant Comment. The project is in general conformance with the city of Glenwood Springs Comprehensive Plan as well as community goals and objectives. Due to the differences between county and municipal land use regulations, it can be difficult to use county land use regulations to achieve objectives of the local community. The county cannot abdicate its land use and regulatory obligations for the unincorporated areas. To form strong relationships between the county and its municipalities’, it is paramount to respect, adhere and use existing adopted local plans. Applicant Comment. The proposed development conforms to the adopted Glenwood Springs future development plans and is also in general conformance with the Garfield County Comprehensive Plan. Goals: Encourage future development requiring urban services to be located in areas where these services are or can readily be made available. Applicant Comment. Urban services are not available to this site nor will they be available in the near future. The applicant is pursuing land use approvals at this new location in response to concerns expressed by Glenwood Springs about the previous site. The applicant unsuccessfully pursued a request for annexation and zoning with the city of Glenwood Springs for a site adjacent Page - 115 to the Glenwood Springs Airport. On September 9, 2014, the applicant obtained a Limited Impact Review approval at the site adjacent to the Glenwood Springs Airport for a Warehouse and Distribution Center from the Board of County Commissioners. The conditions of this approval are detailed in Garfield County Resolution 2014-50. Ensure that county land use policies and development approvals are compatible with the existing zoning and future land use objectives of the appropriate municipality. Applicant Comment. The development conforms to the Glenwood Springs Comprehensive Plan and community goals. This is documented in the previous section of this narrative under the section titled “Relationship to Glenwood Springs Comprehensive Plan”. Policies: 2. Projects proposed adjacent to local municipalities requiring urban services will be encouraged to annex into the affected jurisdiction if contiguity exists. Applicant Comment. As noted previously, the applicant diligently pursued annexation to the city of Glenwood Springs at the site adjacent to the airport. In a spirit of responding to the concerns addressed by the city of Glenwood about roads and access, this new site is proposed. The new location will not impact city streets and will still allow FedEx to service the community and the region. 3. Development in an UGA will have land use and street patterns that are compatible with the affected municipality. Applicant Comment. This project is in the Glenwood Springs UGA but lies outside of the city street grid system. The proposed location is compatible with similar light industrial uses adjacent and near the site. Excellent access to state Highway 82 at a signalized intersection minimizes impacts to existing road systems. The proposed development land-use and roadway access is compatible with the city of Glenwood Springs planning objectives. 4. Within a locally planned UGA, development applicants will be required to obtain project review comments from the local community prior to submitting for county review. The process should be defined in an executed IGA. Applicant Comment. As noted previously, the applicant is processing this application largely in response to concerns expressed by the city of Glenwood Springs. The applicant believes that this project responds to concerns previously expressed by the City. This development application will be referred to Glenwood for review and comment. Section 4 - Economics, Employment and Tourism Vision Light industrial and commercial uses are strategically located within and adjacent to cities and towns by encouraging growth and employment centers to be developed within planned urban growth boundaries. Goals: 1. Maintain a strong and diverse economic base (for both employment and income generation). Applicant Comment. The project adds to the vitality, strength and diversity of the local economic base. It provides long-term employment opportunities as well as short-term employment during construction. Tax benefits will be derived from construction materials, increased assessed valuation and employment income. Page - 116 Policies: 1. Garfield County will encourage the retention and expansion of modest, viable commercial uses that meet the convenience shopping needs of county residents. Applicant Comment. This facility represents both retention and expansion of a viable commercial/light industrial use that is essential for the shopping and shipping needs of county residents. 3. Garfield County will encourage the development of a diversified industrial base recognizing physical location-to-market capabilities of the community, and the social and environmental impacts of industrial uses. 5. The county will direct industrial developments to the airport center and other appropriately designated areas. Applicant Comment. The project is located within the Glenwood Springs urban growth area and adjacent to an existing light industrial/commercial area located away from incompatible uses. The area is zoned “Rural” which allows this use as a Major Impact Review. Strategies and Actions: 1. Ensure that adequate land is reserved for the type, size and scope of industrial/commercial development that is consistent with long-term economic development objectives. 4. Ensure that commercial/industrial developments are compatible with adjacent land uses and preserve the visual quality of the county. Applicant Comment. One of the challenges for FedEx during the previous process was finding adequate land designated for the proposed use. The proposed site is one of a very few that is of a type, size and scope for the intended use. Existing uses adjacent to and near the subject property are light industrial in character and the project is compatible with those uses. The facility is being designed to fit the natural terrain of the property. The layout and design of the project will preserve the visual quality of the County. Section 7 - Water and Sewer Services Goals: 1. Ensure the provision of legal, adequate, dependable, cost-effective and environmentally sound sewer and water services for new development. Applicant Comment. The property is proposed to be served by an on-site well and on-site septic system. Municipal utilities have not been extended to this portion of the Glenwood Springs Urban Growth Area. Adequate, dependable cost-effective and environmentally sound water and septic systems will be installed on-site. Policies: 1. Development located adjacent to municipalities or sanitation districts with available capacity in their central water/sewer systems will be encouraged to tie into these systems. Applicant Comment. As noted previously, existing utility service from the city of Glenwood Springs or a sanitation district is not available near the proposed site. Page - 117 Impact Analysis Adjacent Land Uses. The aerial photograph on the following page shows adjacent land uses within a 1,500 foot radius of the subject property. It is evident from the graphics that the site is adjacent to an existing light industrial use. North of the property, there is another existing light industrial use. . The proposed site is a good location for the proposed FedEx shipping facility in terms of compatibility with adjacent or nearby uses and it has good highway access. At full buildout, the operation will generate 230 single vehicle trips per day. The traffic impact study shows a nominal impact to any of the roadways or intersections from the site traffic. Page - 118 Adjacent Land Use Page - 119 Site Features The property is dominated by a series of relatively flat terraces situated at a prominent bend in the Roaring Fork River on the site of an old gravel pit. Each terrace is separated by a small, relatively steep slope that is characteristic of such river terraces in the Roaring Fork watershed. A dirt driveway passes through the property providing access from Old Highway. The upper terrace (on the east side of the property) is dominated by a flood irrigated hay field on the north with commercial development and the remnants of the old gravel operation. Another dirt driveway passes through this portion of the property paralleling the river to the west of the developed area. Outside of the hayfield and the developed areas, the vegetation is disturbed and quite sparse with large areas of bare soil. The slopes between the terraces are the most intact and the native plant communities that persist on those sites are likely remnants of the vegetation that once dominated the property. The usable portions of the property are not subject to flooding. There are no streams or bodies of water on or adjacent to the upper bench of the property. Soil characteristics Geotechnical investigation was completed by HP-Geotech dated February 27, 2015 (Job NO. 115023A) for this site. The investigation included recommendations for construction of the foundation and roadways on the site and concludes “Based on our review, there are no significant geologic hazards that would make the project infeasible and their potential impacts can be mitigated with good engineering and construction practices.” A copy of the HP-Geotech report is included in this submittal under separate cover. The following map obtained from the US Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service shows the soil types located on the subject property. Page - 120 N A Natural RDsourcos Conservation Sorvlco Soil Map-Rifte Area, Colorado, Parts of Garfiel d and Mesa Counties (Easlbank Soils) We b Soil Survoy National Coopomlivo Sol Survey • ~ ~ ~ ~ »" 29'l~N "' ; ~ § ~ • ~ ~ . ~ M " ~ ~ • k ~ ~ 2/27/2015 Page 1 of3 W28''9"N Page - 121 Map Unit Description: Atencio-Azeltine complex, 1 to 3 percent slopes---Rifle Area, Colorado, Parts of Garfield and Mesa Counties Rifle Area, Colorado, Parts of Garfield and Mesa Counties 8-Atencio-Azeltine complex, 1 to 3 percent slopes USDA Natural Resources --Conservation Servi ce Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol. jnzd Elevation: 5,000 to 7,000 feet Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance Map Unit Composition Azeltine and similar soils.· 45 percent Atencio and similar soils: 45 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Atencio Setting Landform.· Terraces, alluvial fans Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread Down-slope shape: Convex Across-slope shape. Convex Parent material. Mixed alluvium derived from sandstone and shale Typical profile H1 -Oto 11 inches. sandy loam H2 -11 to 23 inches. gravelly sandy clay loam H3 -23 to 28 inches. gravelly sandy loam H4 -28 to 60 inches. extremely cobbly sand Properties and qualities Slope. 1 to 3 percent Depth to restrictive feature. More than 80 inches Natural drainage class.· Well d rained Runoff class: Low Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksalj .· Moderately high to high (0.20 to 2.00 in/hr) Depth to water table. More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding . None Frequency of ponding: None Calcium carbonate, maximum in profile: 10 percent Salinity, maximum in profile. Nonsaline (0 .0 t o 2 .0 mmhos/cm) Available water storage in profile. Low (about 3.8 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated). 4s Land capability classification (nonirrigated)." 4s Hydrologic Soil Group. B Ecological site. Rolling loam (R048AY298CO) Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey Eastbank Soils Unit 8 2/27/2015 Page 1 of 2 Page - 122 Map Unit Description: .Atencio-Azeltine complex, 1 to 3 percent slopes---Rifle Area , Colorado, Parts of Garfield and Mesa Counties Description of Azeltine Setting Landform: Alluvial fans, terraces Landform position {three-dimensional) Tread Down-slope shape: Linear, convex Across-slope shape: Linear, convex Parent material: Mixed alluvium derived from sandstone and shale Typical profile H1 -0 to 18 inches: gravelly sandy loam H2 -18 to 60 inches: extremely gravelly sand Properties and qualities Slope.· 1 to 3 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Well drained Runoff class. Very low Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat) · Moderately high to high (0.60 to 6.00 in/hr) Depth to water table.· More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Calcium carbonate, maximum in profile: 10 percent Salinity, maximum in profile. Nonsaline (0.0 to 2 .0 mmhos/cm) Available water storage in profile: Very low (about 2.5 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated).· 4s Land capability classification (nonirrigated)." 4s Hydrologic Soil Group. A Ecological site Rolling loam (R048AY298CO) Data Source Information Soil Survey Area: Survey Area Data: USDA Natural Resources --Conservation Service Rifle Area , Colorado , Parts of Garfield and Mesa Counties Version 8, Sep 22, 2014 Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey Eastbank Soils Unit 8 2/27/2015 Page 2 of 2 Page - 123 Map Unit Description: Begay sandy loam, 6to12 percent slopes---Rifle Area, Colorado, Parts of Garfield and Mesa Counties Rifle Area, Colorado, Parts of Garfield and Mesa Counties 11-Begay sandy loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: jnx6 Elevation. 5,000 to 6 ,500 feet Farmland classification: Not prime farmland Map Unit Composition Begay and similar soils.· 90 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Begay Setting Landform: Alluvial fans, valley sides Down-slope shape: Linear, convex Across-slope shape: Linear, convex Parent material: Alluvium derived from sandstone and shale Typical profile H1 -0 to 10 inches: sandy loam H2 -10 to 60 inches: stony sandy loam Properties and qualities Slope.· 6 to 12 percent Depth to restrictive feature. More than 80 inches Natural drainage class : Well drained Runoff class: Low Capacityofthemostlimiting layertotransmitwater(Ksat).· High (2.00 to 6.00 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding · None Frequency of ponding. None Calcium carbonate, maximum in profile. 10 percent Salinity, maximum in profile.· Nonsaline (0.0 to 2 .0 mmhos/cm) Available water storage in profile.· Low (about 5. 7 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated)· 4e Land capability classification (nonirrigated). 4e Hydrologic Soil Group.· A Ecological site. Rolling loam (R048AY298CO) Data Source Information Soil Survey Area: Survey Area Data: USDA Natural Resources -~ Conservation Service Rifle Area , Colorado, Parts of Ga rfield and Mesa Counties Version 8, Sep 22 , 2014 Web Soil Survey National Cooperat ive Soil Survey Eastbank Soils Unit 11 2/27/2015 Page 1 of 1 Page - 124 Map Unit Description: Ildefonso stony loam, 25 to 45 percent slopes---Rifle .Area, Colorado, Parts of Garfield and Mesa Counties Rifle Area, Colorado, Parts of Garfield and Mesa Counties 34-lldefonso stony loam, 25 to 45 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: jnyO Elevation. 5,000 to 6 ,500 feet Farmland classification. Not prime farmland Map Unit Composition Ildefonso and similar soils: 90 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Ildefonso Setting Landform: Alluvial fans, valley sides, breaks Down-slope shape: Linear, convex Across-slope shape.· Linear, convex Parent material: Mixed alluvium derived from basalt Typical profile H1 -0 to 8 inches: stony loam H2 -8 to 60 inches.· very stony loam Properties and qualities Slope.· 25 to 45 percent Depth to restrictive feature.· More than 80 inches Natural drainage class.· Well drained Runoff class: Medium Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (KsaO: Moderately high to high (0 .60 to 6.00 in/hr) Depth to water table. More than 80 inche s Frequency of flooding. None Frequency of ponding. None Calcium carbonate, maximum in profile: 35 percent Salinity, maximum in profile.· Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 4.0 mmhos/c m) Available water storage in profile: Low (about 5.1 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated) None specifie d Land capability classification (nonirrigated). 7e Hydrologic Soil Group. A Data Source Information Soil Survey Area : Survey Area Data: USDA Natural Resources -~ Conservation Service Rifle Area, Colorado, Parts of Garfield and Mesa Counties Version 8, Sep 22 , 2 014 Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey Eastbank Soils Unit 2/27/201 5 Page 1 of 1 Page - 125 Geology and Hazard. The map below includes hazard data obtained from the Garfield County Geologic Hazard GIS data download web-site. The subject property lies outside identified Slope, Soils and Surficial Hazard areas as well as Septic System Constraints. The geotechnical Investigation completed by HP-Geotech for this site and included with this submittal did not identify conditions that would preclude construction of the proposed facility at this location as long as the recommendations in the report are followed. Site Page - 126 Site Page - 127 Site Page - 128 Site Page - 129 Floodplain Map Site Page - 130 Floodway Map Site Page - 131 SWMP / Disturbance / OWTS Page - 132 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE I. Introduction 3 II. Construction Sequence 3 III. Existing Conditions 4 IV. Proposed Conditions 4 V. Best Management Practices (BMP's) 4 VI. Material Handling and Spill Prevention 5 VII. Final Stabilization 6 VIII. Inspection and Maintenance 6 IX. Retention of Records 6 Appendix A: Site Location -Plat Appendix A: Grading Drainage and Erosion Control Plan Page 2 j :/sdskproj/21511005/word/SWMP Fedex.doc Page - 133 Page - 134 Page - 135 Page - 136 Page - 137 < ~ ~ ffi ~ ~ ~ I I I C R J J > l D C S C A L E 'kr... J ; ; J - j I i t • r m l 1 - · - l l o fk.~;: : ¥ ~ · · , . - · - · ~ - - · - - - ~ - E A S T B A N K , L L C M I N O R S U B D I V I S I O N A S U B D I V I S I O N O F P A R C E L 2 A O F E A S T B A N K P A R C E L 2 L O T S P L I T A P A R C E L O F L A N D S I T U A T E D I N T H E S I / 2 S E C T I O N 3 5 , T O W N S H I P 6 S O U T H , R A N G E 8 9 W E S T O F T H E 6 T H P . M . C O U N T Y O F G A R F I E L D , S T A T E O F C O L O R A D O ( I . ' I ' l . . . . , . . . l l \ Q N l l l t t " : - . 1 , m - = . - ~ ~ l O < r \ ' t . . . i , " ' . . . 0 . - . . ; : ; ; - ' . \ . _ _ _ - ~ - - - - - - ' ' ' · ~ · ~ . . . . . : e n ~ . . . . . . , . . . . . . . , . _ I F t O N B S l ' 1 D G £ G O U C O V R 5 o ' W £ 5 T ' I A . N l ' \ ' 1 U H < l I . . . . : . . : " " " ' " ~ : = % L m " " ' \ ~ - ~ / · ~ - - - - - - - - - L . 1 _ _ , . . . , . D f Z T A l L A ~ . . . . . ~ - • c - a . . - C # • o r u a ) . , , . , , , . . , . . . , . ' • , ~ I I ~ · r ~ I r . ! J 1 1 t i ~ i , i i k J ! - ~ ~ 8 1 8 " . f ~ . ; z : ~ 1 · ~ ~ ~ I I ~ : > : d ! r ~ " f ~ ~ u ~ g ~ g : ! ~ ~ • 1 n 1 ~ H ~ 8 H ~ : J ~ , . ~ a _ . . . . . . . . _ F 2 Page - 138 I: -l ,, / / I I I APPENDIXB I ' / I I I { """"""UC GA.A:F'lnDCOUN'T't'.CO IEA$T1W« MAJOR Otvn.Ofl'MD(J GRADING, ORA.INAGf.: AND EROStoH CONTROL Pl...AH I Page8 j :/ sdskproj/215/100 5/word/S WMP F edex. doc I I A' t"'\ 1 1 I I \ \_ -Ir \ \ I /-,,-.._, .J ,,.,."' fa ./ Page - 139 Onsite Water Treatment System Plan Page - 140 Page - 141 Page - 142 Page - 143 Floodplain, Runoff and Ground Water. This submittal includes a geotech, and drainage reports submitted under separate cover that include a detailed analysis of these issues. There are no floodplain impacts on the useable portions of the property. As noted in the soils information, the majority of the site where development will take place is underlain by Atencio-Azeltine complex soils which are generally sandy loams, gravelly/sandy clay loams that are well-drained and are not subject to flooding. The applicant is proposing individual septic disposal systems for wastewater treatment on each of the lots. Percolation tests were performed on the site and the final design of the ISDS will be based upon those results. These systems will be properly designed and installed and will not adversely impact runoff, stream flow or groundwater. All site runoff will be managed in conformance with the engineered drainage analysis and best practices, thereby, avoiding adverse impacts to surface water or groundwater. Environmental Impacts Construction of the new facility on the property will result in the removal of flora and fauna where there are paved surfaces, building construction and detention basins. Effect of development on environmental resources including critical wildlife habitat will be minimal. The report prepared by Colorado Wildlife Science, LLC notes that there will not be adverse impacts to mule deer, elk or endangered/threatened animal populations. The property is not in any identified deer or elk migration routes. Obviously, construction on the FedEx site will remove vegetation. Some of this vegetation will be replaced with low water consuming landscaping which will offset some of the adverse impact. The site is located in an area that is adjacent to existing light industrial uses. Impacts on wildlife and domestic animals through creation of hazardous attractions will be nominal. There will be no domestic animals on the property. As noted previously, wildlife impacts are minimal and there will be some elimination of habitat as a result of construction of the facility. There will be no blockade of migration routes, use patterns or similar wildlife impacts. There will be few if any food wastes generated on-site which otherwise would attract wildlife, dogs and/or cats. All waste will be placed in a properly designed trash receptacles to prevent access by wildlife and domestic animals. Radiation Hazard There are no known radiation hazards on the site that have been identified by the State or County Health Departments. The following responses were received from the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment and Garfield County Public Health Department. Colorado Department of Public Health Hi Davis, I have searched a two-mile radius around your subject property and show no records of any facilities within that area in the HMWMD Record Center databases. The nearest facilities are the Eimco Coal Machinery at 2222 Devereaux Road (5.8 miles northwest) and the Carbondale Landfill on Highway 82 (8.7 miles to the southeast). See attached map. Best, Kay Garfield County Public Health Department From: Morgan Hill [mailto:mhill@garfield-county.com] Sent: Monday, March 9, 2015 4:00 PM Page - 144 To: Davis Farrar Cc: Joshua Williams Subject: RE: Radiation Hazard Hi Davis, Our office does not have any records of radiation hazards at that location. As usual, please contact other appropriate agencies such as the CDPHE or DNR to determine if they may have any records. Thanks, Morgan Hill Environmental Health Specialist III Garfield County Public Health 195 W. 14th Street Rifle, CO 81650 Phone: (970) 665-6383 Email: mhill@garfield-county.com, www.garfield-county.com/environmental-health Nuisances This site will not generate vapor, dust, smoke, noise, glare or vibration at any significant levels or at nuisance levels beyond the property boundary. There will be sound generated by truck and vehicular traffic to the site, but that will not exceed normal ambient levels. Noise generated on this site will be comparable to that of adjacent uses. Landscaping, paved and impervious surfaces will prevent the generation of dust. Exterior lighting will be downcast to minimize glare and/or lighting trespass. The only omissions from the property will be those minimal amounts normally associated with vehicle exhaust and/or building heating systems. Hours of Operation The proposed facility will operate 7 days a week with terminal operation for trailers and 5 days per week terminal operation for pick-up and delivery. Based on this it is anticipated that the proposed Federal Express facility at build-out will generate a total of 230 ADT with 47 trips (24 inbound/23 outbound) during the AM peak hour and 44 trips (24 inbound/20 outbound) during the PM peak hour. It should also be noted that this facility will not be open to the general public (see the Rick Engineering Traffic Impact Analysis submitted separately with this application). The operation will employ 14.5 full-time equivalent (FTE) workers; 9 full time and 9.5 part-time persons. Page - 145 Estimated Construction Costs Page - 146 Development Agreement / Improvement Agreement Pursuant to Section 4-202 of the Garfield County Land Use Code “Waiver of Submission Requirements”, the applicant hereby requests a Waiver of Submission of a Development Agreement for the FedEx Ground East Bank Major Impact Review Application. This project does not include any publicly dedicated improvements. The small size of this project and the limited impacts associated with development of the site support this waiver request. Request for over this waiver will not compromise proper or complete review of the application. The applicant has had conversations with the County Attorney on this topic and previously the County Attorney has concurred that a development agreement was not necessary. FEDERAL EXPRESS GROUND DISTRIBUTION FACILITY TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS GARFIELD COUNTY March 6, 2015 (JOB NUMBER 17237-B) RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY rickengineering.com TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ......................................................................................................................................1 Project Description ..........................................................................................................................1 Existing Transportation Conditions .................................................................................................1 Existing Traffic Volumes .................................................................................................................5 Traffic Analysis Methodology .........................................................................................................5 Existing (2015) Traffic Operations ..................................................................................................7 Opening Year (2016) Without Project Traffic Volumes .................................................................7 Opening Year (2016) Without Project Traffic Analysis ..................................................................7 Project Traffic Generation ...............................................................................................................7 Trip Distribution/Assignment ........................................................................................................14 Opening Year (2016) With Project Traffic Analysis .....................................................................14 Turn Template Analysis .................................................................................................................14 Queuing Analysis ...........................................................................................................................14 Conclusions/Recommendations .....................................................................................................23 References ......................................................................................................................................25 Appendices Appendix A – Traffic Volume Counts Appendix B – Intersection and Queuing Calculation Sheets Appendix C – Background Traffic Appendix D – Trip Generation Appendix E – Turning Templates Tables 1. Existing Roadway Segment Operations ..............................................................................8 2. Existing Intersection Operations ..........................................................................................9 3. Opening Year (2016) Without Project Roadway Segment Operations .............................11 4. Opening Year (2016) Without Project Intersection Operations ........................................12 5. Traffic Generation ..............................................................................................................13 6. Opening Year (2016) With Project Roadway Segment Operations ..................................18 7. Opening Year (2016) With Project Intersection Operations .............................................19 8. Roadway Segment Operations Summary ..........................................................................20 9. Intersection Operations Summary .....................................................................................21 10. Queuing Summary .............................................................................................................22 Exhibits 1. Project Vicinity Map ............................................................................................................2 2. Proposed Site Plan ...............................................................................................................3 3. Existing Transportation Conditions .....................................................................................4 4. Existing Traffic Volumes .....................................................................................................6 5. Opening Year (2016) Without Project Traffic Volumes ...................................................10 6. Project Traffic Distribution ................................................................................................15 7. Project Traffic Assignment ................................................................................................16 8. Opening Year (2016) With Project Traffic Volumes ........................................................17 9. Project Access Recommendations .....................................................................................24 10. Single Unit Truck Turning Template - Driveway ............................................. Appendix D 11. WB-67D Truck Turning Template - Driveway ................................................. Appendix D K:\Files\17237\toc\17237b.001.doc FEDERAL EXPRESS GROUND DISTRIBUTION FACILITY TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS GARFIELD COUNTY March 6, 2015 Prepared for: Kiernan West, LLC PO Box 979 Telluride, CO 81435 Prepared by: Job Number 17237B FEDERAL EXPRESS GROUND DISTRIBUTION FACILITY TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS GARFIELD COUNTY March 6, 2015 INTRODUCTION The following Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) has been prepared to determine any traffic-related impacts within the project area roadways and intersections due to the proposed development of the Federal Express Ground Distribution Facility project. The project site is located southeast of Colorado State Highway 82 and County Road 154 within Garfield County. Exhibit 1 shows the project vicinity map. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project proposes to construct a 26,794 SF building on approximately 3.85 acres that will operate as a sorting and distribution facility serving the greater Glenwood Springs area; however this site will not be open to the general public. Access to the project site will be via one full shared access point off of County Road 154. It should be noted that the existing access (which has less than 20 trips per day) to Lot 3 located south of this project site is to remain. Exhibit 2 shows the proposed project site plan. EXISTING TRANSPORTATION CONDITIONS Although the Federal Express Ground Distribution Facility will be located within Garfield County, traffic for the project will travel along both Garfield County and State Highway roadways. The following is a brief description of County and State roadways within the project area. County Road 154 is an undivided two-lane collector street that provides access to businesses and residential neighborhoods. Near the project area, the 85th percentile speed for the northbound direction is 41 mph while the southbound direction is 36 mph. There are no curb, gutter, sidewalk or on street parking provided along this road. The future project driveway is proposed to take access off of County Road 154. Colorado State Hwy 82 is a four lane divided highway and classified as a principal arterial within the project area with 85th percentile speed of 59 mph. There are no curb, gutter, sidewalk or on street parking provided along this highway. Exhibit 3 shows the existing transportation conditions within the project area. 1 2 3 4 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES This TIA analyzes the following intersections within the project area: State Highway 82/County Road 154 (Old Highway 82) (Signalized) County Road 154 (Old Highway 82)/Driveway (Future Project Driveway) The following roadway segments were also analyzed: State Highway 82, west of County Road 154 (Old Highway 82) State Highway 82, east of County Road 154 (Old Highway 82) County Road 154 (Old Highway 82), south of State Highway 82 Existing traffic volumes at the project area intersections were obtained from traffic counts conducted by All Traffic Data Services, Inc. on Thursday February 19, 2015. The turning movement counts were conducted during the AM (7-9) and PM (4-6) peak periods. Additionally, machine counts were done along State Highway 82, west and east of County Road 154 and along County Road 154, south of State Highway 82, documenting volume, classification, and speed. Exhibit 4 shows the existing intersection turning movement counts and ADT’s within the study area. Appendix A contains the traffic volume count sheets. TRAFFIC ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY The intersections and roadways within the project area were analyzed for the following scenarios: · Existing (2015) · Opening year (2016) without Project: Existing + Ambient Growth + Background Traffic · Opening year (2016) with project traffic: Existing + Ambient Growth + Background Traffic + Project Traffic The Level of Service (LOS) for signalized intersections was calculated using the methodologies described in Chapter 18 of the 2010 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM). The LOS for signalized intersections is defined in terms of control delay, which is made up of a number of factors that relate to right-of-way control, geometrics and traffic volumes. The signalized intersection analysis also takes into account intersection spacing and coordination. The LOS for unsignalized intersections was calculated using the methodologies described in Chapters 19 of the 2010 HCM. The LOS for an unsignalized (two-way stop controlled) intersection is determined by the computed control delay for each minor street movement and major street left-turns, and not for the intersection as a whole. LOS A through D is considered acceptable for peak hour intersection operations. The project area intersections were analyzed during the AM and PM peak hours. The intersection calculation sheets are contained in Appendix B. The LOS for daily roadway segment operations was calculated based on volume to capacity ratios. LOS A through D is considered acceptable for urbanized areas. 5 6 EXISTING (2015) TRAFFIC OPERATIONS Table 1 shows that the studied street segments currently operate at LOS C or better on a daily basis. Table 2 shows that the State Highway 82/County Road 154 signalized intersection and the County Road 154/Driveway unsignalized intersection currently operate at LOS B or better during both the AM and PM peak hours. OPENING YEAR (2016) WITHOUT PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES A 2% growth rate was applied to 2015 existing traffic volumes to account for ambient growth. Additionally, based on input from County staff, the following three projects were included as background traffic. 1. River Edge Colorado (Cattle Creek Metropolitan District), consisting of 366 single family dwelling units and a 6000 sf recreation center. 2. Buffalo Valley Apartments, consisting of 54 apartments. 3. Skylark School (K-12), consisting of 108 students. Exhibit 5 shows the opening year (2016) without project traffic volumes. Refer to Appendix C for the background traffic. OPENING YEAR (2016) WITHOUT PROJECT TRAFFIC ANALYSIS Table 3 shows that the studied street segments are anticipated to operate at LOS D or better on a daily basis. Table 4 shows that the State Highway 82/County Road 154 signalized intersection and the County Road 154/Driveway unsignalized intersection are anticipated to operate at LOS B or better during both the AM and PM peak hours. PROJECT TRAFFIC GENERATION The project traffic generation for the Federal Express Ground Distribution Facility was calculated based on data provided from Federal Express at similar facilities. It is projected that the proposed facility will operate 7 days a week with terminal operation for trailers and 5 days per week terminal operation for pick-up and delivery. Based on this it is anticipated that the proposed Federal Express facility at build-out will generate a total of 230 ADT with 47 trips (24 inbound/23 outbound) during the AM peak hour and 44 trips (24 inbound/20 outbound) during the PM peak hour. It should also be noted that this facility will not be open to the general public. Table 5 shows the traffic generation. The trip generation calculations sheet is contained in Appendix D. 7 TABLE 1 EXISTING ROADWAY SEGMENT OPERATIONS Volume V/C LOS Colorado State Hwy 82 West of County Road 154 Principal Arterial 30,000 23,844 0.79 C East of County Road 154 Principal Arterial 30,000 21,862 0.73 C County Road 154 South of Colorado State Hwy 82 Collector 5,000 2,426 0.49 B * Derived from City of Glenwood Springs street standards ExistingRoadway Segment Classification LOS E * Capacity T:\17237-B\Traffic\Reports\Tables\17237b.001_Ex-RoadwaySeg.xls 8 TABLE 2 EXISTING INTERSECTION OPERATIONS DELAY LOS CO State Hwy 82/County Road 154 (S) AM Peak 14.2 B PM Peak 12.5 B County Road 154/Driveway (U) AM Peak EB L 9.9 A NB L 0.1 A PM Peak EB L 9.8 A NB L 0.1 A Note: Delays and Level of Service calculated utilizing the methodologies described in Chapters 18 and 19 of the 2010 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM). DELAY is measured in seconds LOS = Level of Service NB = northbound, SB=southbound, etc. T=thru movement, L=left-turn movement, etc. (S) = Signalized intersection (U) = Unsignalized intersection EXISTING INTERSECTION T:\17237-B\Traffic\Reports\Tables\17237b.002_Ex-Intersection.xls 9 10 TABLE 3 OPENING YEAR (2016) WITHOUT PROJECT ROADWAY SEGMENT OPERATIONS Volume V/C LOS Colorado State Hwy 82 West of County Road 154 Principal Arterial 30,000 26,464 0.88 D East of County Road 154 Principal Arterial 30,000 24,437 0.81 D County Road 154 South of Colorado State Hwy 82 Collector 5,000 2,475 0.50 B * Derived from City of Glenwood Springs street standards 2016 Non-Site (Background Only)Roadway Segment Classification LOS E * Capacity T:\17237-B\Traffic\Reports\Tables\17237b.003_2016bg-RoadwaySeg.xls 11 TABLE 4 OPENING YEAR (2016) WITHOUT PROJECT INTERSECTION OPERATIONS DELAY LOS CO State Hwy 82/County Road 154 (S) AM Peak 15.0 B PM Peak 14.0 B County Road 154/Driveway (U) AM Peak EB L 9.8 A NB L 0.1 A PM Peak EB L 10.0 B NB L 0.1 A Note: Delays and Level of Service calculated utilizing the methodologies described in Chapters 18 and 19 of the 2010 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM). DELAY is measured in seconds LOS = Level of Service NB = northbound, SB=southbound, etc. T=thru movement, L=left-turn movement, etc. (S) = Signalized intersection (U) = Unsignalized intersection INTERSECTION 2015 NON-SITE (BACKGROUND ONLY) T:\17237-B\Traffic\Reports\Tables\17237b.004_2016bg-Intersection.xls 12 TABLE 5 FEDERAL EXPRESS GROUND DISTRIBUTION CENTER TRAFFIC GENERATION IN OUT IN OUT Federal Express 230 24 23 24 20 Note: Traffic generation based on data provided from Federal Express at similar facilities. ADTLAND USE AM PEAK PM PEAK VOLUME VOLUME T:\17237-B\Traffic\Reports\Tables\17237b.005_TripGen.xls 13 TRIP DISTRIBUTION/ASSIGNMENT The site traffic distribution was estimated based on the site’s proximity to the nearby major roadways, existing local traffic patterns and existing traffic counts at the project area intersections. . Exhibit 6 shows the project traffic distribution percentages utilized for assigning the project trips. Exhibit 7 shows the primary project traffic trip assignment for opening year (2016). Once the project distribution has been established, the project traffic volumes were added to the project area intersections and roadways. Exhibit 8 shows the opening year (2016) with project traffic volumes (including existing, ambient growth, and project traffic). OPENING YEAR (2016) WITH PROJECT TRAFFIC ANALYSIS Table 6 shows that the studied street segments are anticipated to continue to operate at LOS D or better on a daily basis. Table 7 shows that the State Highway 82/County Road 154 signalized intersection and the County Road 154/Driveway unsignalized intersection are anticipated to continue to operate at LOS B or better during both the AM and PM peak hours. Table 8 shows a summary of all studied project roadway segments, and Table 9 shows a summary of all studied project intersections. TURN TEMPLATE ANALYSIS Truck turning templates were analyzed at the County Road 154/Driveway (Future Project Driveway), to determine if Federal Express trucks accessing the proposed site will be able to maneuver through the intersections safely without impacting other vehicles or fixed objects. Based on information provided by the client, the AASHTO SU single unit truck and the WB- 67D dual trailer truck most closely resemble the anticipated delivery trucks. As shown in Exhibits 10 and 11, the trucks are anticipated to be able to safely maneuver through the proposed widened driveway apron, without negatively impacting other vehicles or fixed objects. Refer to Appendix E for the truck turning templates. QUEUING ANALYSIS Based on queuing analysis results, no significant queuing were reported for both the signalized intersection of State Highway 82/County Road 154 and the unsignalized intersection of County Road 154/Driveway (Future Project Driveway), for all scenarios. Table 10 shows summary of the queuing lengths for all the studied intersections. The queuing calculation sheets are contained in Appendix B along with the intersection calculation sheets. 14 15 16 17 TABLE 6 OPENING YEAR (2016) WITH PROJECT ROADWAY SEGMENT OPERATIONS Volume V/C LOS Colorado State Hwy 82 West of County Road 154 Principal Arterial 30,000 26,579 0.89 D East of County Road 154 Principal Arterial 30,000 24,542 0.82 D County Road 154 South of Colorado State Hwy 82 Collector 5,000 2,487 0.50 B * Derived from City of Glenwood Springs street standards Opening Year (2016)Roadway Segment Classification LOS E * Capacity T:\17237-B\Traffic\Reports\Tables\17237b.006_2016wproj_RoadwaySeg.xls 18 TABLE 7 OPENING YEAR (2016) WITH PROJECT INTERSECTION OPERATIONS DELAY LOS CO State Hwy 82/County Road 154 (S) AM Peak 17.1 B PM Peak 15.5 B County Road 154/Driveway (U) AM Peak EB L 10.4 B NB L 0.1 A PM Peak EB L 10.6 B NB L 0.1 A Note: Delays and Level of Service calculated utilizing the methodologies described in Chapters 18 and 19 of the 2010 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM). DELAY is measured in seconds LOS = Level of Service NB = northbound, SB=southbound, etc. T=thru movement, L=left-turn movement, etc. (S) = Signalized intersection (U) = Unsignalized intersection OPENING YEAR (2016)INTERSECTION T:\17237-B\Traffic\Reports\Tables\17237b.007_2016wproj_Intersection.xls 19 TABLE 8 ROADWAY SEGMENT OPERATIONS SUMMARY VOLUME V/C LOS VOLUME V/C LOS VOLUME V/C LOS Colorado State Hwy 82 West of County Road 154 Principal Arterial 30,000 23,844 0.79 C 26,464 0.88 D 26,579 0.89 D East of County Road 154 Principal Arterial 30,000 21,862 0.73 C 24,437 0.81 D 24,542 0.82 D County Road 154 South of Colorado State Hwy 82 Collector 5,000 2,426 0.49 B 2,475 0.50 B 2,487 0.50 B * Derived from City of Glenwood Springs street standards OPENING YEAR WITHOUT PROJECTEXISTING OPENING YEAR WITH PROJECTINTERSECTIONLOS E * CapacityCLASSIFICATION T:\17237-B\Traffic\Reports\Tables\17237b.008_RoadwaySeg_Summary.xls 20 TABLE 9 INTERSECTION OPERATIONS SUMMARY DELAY LOS DELAY LOS DELAY LOS CO State Hwy 82/County Road 154 (S) AM Peak 14.2 B 15.0 B 17.1 B PM Peak 12.5 B 14.0 B 15.5 B County Road 154/Driveway (U) AM Peak EB L 9.9 A 9.8 A 10.4 B NB L 0.1 A 0.1 A 0.1 A PM Peak EB L 9.8 A 10.0 B 10.6 B NB L 0.1 A 0.1 A 0.1 A Note: Delays and Level of Service calculated utilizing the methodologies described in Chapters 18 and 19 of the 2010 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM). DELAY is measured in seconds LOS = Level of Service NB = northbound, SB=southbound, etc. T=thru movement, L=left-turn movement, etc. (S) = Signalized intersection (U) = Unsignalized intersection OPENING YEAR WITHOUT PROJECTEXISTING OPENING YEAR WITH PROJECTINTERSECTION T:\17237-B\Traffic\Reports\Tables\17237b.009_IntersectionSummary.xls 21 TABLE 10 QUEUING SUMMARY 95th Percentile Queue Length (ft) * Available Storage (ft) 95th Percentile Queue Length (ft) * Available Storage (ft) 95th Percentile Queue Length (ft) * Available Storage (ft) CO State Hwy 82/County Road 154 (S) EBL 339.0 750 295.0 750 350.0 750 SBR 52.0 675 55.0 675 62.0 675 County Road 154/Driveway (U) EBLR 32.0 200 35.0 200 62.0 200 Note: NB = northbound, SB=southbound, etc. T=thru movement, L=left-turn movement, etc. (S) = Signalized intersection (U) = Unsignalized intersection * Higher of AM or PM Peak hour OPENING YEAR WITHOUT PROJECTEXISTING OPENING YEAR WITH PROJECT INTERSECTION T:\17237-B\Traffic\Reports\Tables\17237b.010_QueueingSummary.xls 22 CONCLUSIONS/RECOMMENDATIONS The TIA evaluated any potential traffic impacts due to the proposed Federal Express Ground Distribution Facility project. The project is anticipated to generate 230 ADT, with 47 AM peak hour trips (24 inbound/23 outbound) and 44 PM peak hour trips (24 inbound/20 outbound). Based on the analysis contained within this report, all studied intersections and roadways are anticipated to operate at an acceptable LOS with the addition of the project traffic. The following recommendations are proposed for the project: County Road 154/Project Driveway While the existing lane geometries can remain as follows, it is recommended that the driveway apron be widened to accommodate the delivery trucks as mentioned above: Eastbound Approach – 1 shared left-turn/right-turn lane Southbound Approach – 1 shared through/right-turn lane Northbound Approach – 1 shared left-turn/through lane A stop sign and limit line is also recommended to be installed for the eastbound driveway approach to County Road 154. Exhibit 9 shows a graphical representation of the proposed project area transportation recommendations for opening year (2016). 23 24 REFERENCES 1. Garfield County, Comprehensive Plan 2030, October 9, 2013. 2. Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation, 9th Edition, Washington, D.C., 2012. 3. Trafficware, SYNCHRO, Version 8, Build 805, Sugar Land, Texas, 2013. 4. Transportation Research Board, Highway Capacity Manual, Washington, D.C., 2010. 25 APPENDIX A Traffic Volume Counts File Name : #1 CR154&HWY82AM Site Code : 1 Start Date : 2/19/2015 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Class 1 DIRT RD Southbound HWY 82 Westbound CR 154 (OLD HWY 82) Northbound HWY 82 Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Int. Total 07:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 81 0 0 1 0 15 0 15 233 0 0 345 07:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 146 0 0 0 0 32 0 15 294 0 0 487 07:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 147 0 0 0 0 41 0 15 311 0 0 514 07:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 191 0 0 0 0 46 0 19 311 0 0 567 Total 0 0 0 0 0 565 0 0 1 0 134 0 64 1149 0 0 1913 08:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 171 1 0 1 0 30 0 16 310 0 0 529 08:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 152 0 0 0 0 21 0 19 295 0 0 487 08:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 164 0 0 0 0 17 0 11 255 0 0 447 08:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 157 0 0 1 2 24 0 15 209 0 0 408 Total 0 0 0 0 0 644 1 0 2 2 92 0 61 1069 0 0 1871 Grand Total 0 0 0 0 0 1209 1 0 3 2 226 0 125 2218 0 0 3784 Apprch %0 0 0 0 0 99.9 0.1 0 1.3 0.9 97.8 0 5.3 94.7 0 0 Total %0 0 0 0 0 32 0 0 0.1 0.1 6 0 3.3 58.6 0 0 DIRT RD H W Y 8 2 H W Y 8 2 CR 154 (OLD HWY 82) Right 0 Thru 0 Left 0 Peds 0 InOut Total 2 0 2 R i g h t 0 T h r u 1 2 0 9 L e f t 1 P e d s 0 O u t T o t a l I n 2 2 2 1 1 2 1 0 3 4 3 1 Left 226 Thru 2 Right 3 Peds 0 Out TotalIn 126 231 357 Le f t 0 Th r u 22 1 8 Ri g h t 12 5 Pe d s 0 To t a l Ou t In 14 3 5 23 4 3 37 7 8 2/19/2015 07:00 AM 2/19/2015 08:45 AM Class 1 North All Traffic Data Services,Inc. 9660 W 44th Ave Wheat Ridge,CO 80033 www.alltrafficdata.net File Name : #1 CR154&HWY82AM Site Code : 1 Start Date : 2/19/2015 Page No : 2 DIRT RD Southbound HWY 82 Westbound CR 154 (OLD HWY 82) Northbound HWY 82 Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:15 AM 07:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 146 0 0 146 0 0 32 0 32 15 294 0 0 309 487 07:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 147 0 0 147 0 0 41 0 41 15 311 0 0 326 514 07:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 191 0 0 191 0 0 46 0 46 19 311 0 0 330 567 08:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 171 1 0 172 1 0 30 0 31 16 310 0 0 326 529 Total Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 655 1 0 656 1 0 149 0 150 65 1226 0 0 1291 2097 % App. Total 0 0 0 0 0 99.8 0.2 0 0.7 0 99.3 0 5 95 0 0 PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .857 .250 .000 .859 .250 .000 .810 .000 .815 .855 .986 .000 .000 .978 .925 DIRT RD H W Y 8 2 H W Y 8 2 CR 154 (OLD HWY 82) Right 0 Thru 0 Left 0 Peds 0 InOut Total 0 0 0 R i g h t 0 T h r u 6 5 5 L e f t 1 P e d s 0 O u t T o t a l I n 1 2 2 7 6 5 6 1 8 8 3 Left 149 Thru 0 Right 1 Peds 0 Out TotalIn 66 150 216 Le f t 0 Th r u 12 2 6 Ri g h t 65 Pe d s 0 To t a l Ou t In 80 4 12 9 1 20 9 5 Peak Hour Begins at 07:15 AM Class 1 Peak Hour Data North All Traffic Data Services,Inc. 9660 W 44th Ave Wheat Ridge,CO 80033 www.alltrafficdata.net File Name : #1 CR154&HWY82PM Site Code : 1 Start Date : 2/19/2015 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Class 1 DIRT RD Southbound HWY 82 Westbound CR 154 (OLD HWY 82) Northbound HWY 82 Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Int. Total 04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 316 0 0 0 0 25 0 22 178 0 0 541 04:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 348 1 0 0 0 26 0 20 182 0 0 577 04:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 340 1 0 0 0 33 0 27 197 0 0 598 04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 375 0 0 0 0 25 0 23 189 0 0 612 Total 0 0 0 0 0 1379 2 0 0 0 109 0 92 746 0 0 2328 05:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 335 0 0 1 0 35 0 31 210 0 0 612 05:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 429 0 0 0 0 35 0 31 201 0 0 696 05:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 291 0 0 0 1 19 0 33 190 0 0 534 05:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 337 0 0 0 0 34 0 17 157 0 0 545 Total 0 0 0 0 0 1392 0 0 1 1 123 0 112 758 0 0 2387 Grand Total 0 0 0 0 0 2771 2 0 1 1 232 0 204 1504 0 0 4715 Apprch %0 0 0 0 0 99.9 0.1 0 0.4 0.4 99.1 0 11.9 88.1 0 0 Total %0 0 0 0 0 58.8 0 0 0 0 4.9 0 4.3 31.9 0 0 DIRT RD H W Y 8 2 H W Y 8 2 CR 154 (OLD HWY 82) Right 0 Thru 0 Left 0 Peds 0 InOut Total 1 0 1 R i g h t 0 T h r u 2 7 7 1 L e f t 2 P e d s 0 O u t T o t a l I n 1 5 0 5 2 7 7 3 4 2 7 8 Left 232 Thru 1 Right 1 Peds 0 Out TotalIn 206 234 440 Le f t 0 Th r u 15 0 4 Ri g h t 20 4 Pe d s 0 To t a l Ou t In 30 0 3 17 0 8 47 1 1 2/19/2015 04:00 PM 2/19/2015 05:45 PM Class 1 North All Traffic Data Services,Inc. 9660 W 44th Ave Wheat Ridge,CO 80033 www.alltrafficdata.net File Name : #1 CR154&HWY82PM Site Code : 1 Start Date : 2/19/2015 Page No : 2 DIRT RD Southbound HWY 82 Westbound CR 154 (OLD HWY 82) Northbound HWY 82 Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:30 PM 04:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 340 1 0 341 0 0 33 0 33 27 197 0 0 224 598 04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 375 0 0 375 0 0 25 0 25 23 189 0 0 212 612 05:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 335 0 0 335 1 0 35 0 36 31 210 0 0 241 612 05:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 429 0 0 429 0 0 35 0 35 31 201 0 0 232 696 Total Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 1479 1 0 1480 1 0 128 0 129 112 797 0 0 909 2518 % App. Total 0 0 0 0 0 99.9 0.1 0 0.8 0 99.2 0 12.3 87.7 0 0 PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .862 .250 .000 .862 .250 .000 .914 .000 .896 .903 .949 .000 .000 .943 .904 DIRT RD H W Y 8 2 H W Y 8 2 CR 154 (OLD HWY 82) Right 0 Thru 0 Left 0 Peds 0 InOut Total 0 0 0 R i g h t 0 T h r u 1 4 7 9 L e f t 1 P e d s 0 O u t T o t a l I n 7 9 8 1 4 8 0 2 2 7 8 Left 128 Thru 0 Right 1 Peds 0 Out TotalIn 113 129 242 Le f t 0 Th r u 79 7 Ri g h t 11 2 Pe d s 0 To t a l Ou t In 16 0 7 90 9 25 1 6 Peak Hour Begins at 04:30 PM Class 1 Peak Hour Data North All Traffic Data Services,Inc. 9660 W 44th Ave Wheat Ridge,CO 80033 www.alltrafficdata.net Page 1 Site Code: 2.5 Station ID: 2.5 HWY 82 W/O CR 154 (OLD HWY 82) All Traffic Data Services, Inc 9660 W 44th Ave Wheat Ridge,CO 80033 www.alltrafficdata.net WB Start Cars &2 Axle 2 Axle 3 Axle 4 Axle <5 Axl 5 Axle >6 Axl <6 Axl 6 Axle >6 Axl Time Bikes Trailers Long Buses 6 Tire Single Single Double Double Double Multi Multi Multi Total 02/19/15 1 36 6 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 01:00 0 9 5 2 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 20 02:00 0 7 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 03:00 0 7 2 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 04:00 0 24 8 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 05:00 0 74 17 1 9 1 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 105 06:00 1 151 45 5 24 7 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 234 07:00 4 490 99 16 37 4 0 17 2 3 2 0 0 674 08:00 1 523 113 12 42 5 0 20 3 1 0 0 1 721 09:00 2 449 99 11 60 4 0 12 3 1 1 0 1 643 10:00 4 441 129 10 39 1 0 26 4 1 1 0 0 656 11:00 3 523 122 6 53 4 0 26 3 1 1 0 0 742 12 PM 2 524 136 13 56 5 0 15 4 1 0 0 0 756 13:00 3 504 107 8 35 3 0 21 4 0 1 0 1 687 14:00 0 576 142 11 34 6 1 23 1 2 3 0 0 799 15:00 6 739 211 10 69 2 0 27 1 3 1 0 1 1070 16:00 6 925 245 11 68 8 1 63 3 3 0 1 0 1334 17:00 4 1007 261 11 53 7 0 45 3 4 0 1 0 1396 18:00 3 590 129 12 36 1 0 25 1 0 0 1 0 798 19:00 0 334 66 6 13 1 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 423 20:00 0 200 37 7 10 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 257 21:00 1 170 26 6 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 209 22:00 0 108 24 2 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 138 23:00 0 62 14 3 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 82 Total 41 8473 2046 171 662 59 2 327 36 20 11 6 4 11858 Percent 0.3%71.5%17.3%1.4%5.6%0.5%0.0%2.8%0.3%0.2%0.1%0.1%0.0% AM Peak 07:00 08:00 10:00 07:00 09:00 06:00 10:00 10:00 07:00 07:00 05:00 08:00 11:00 Vol.4 523 129 16 60 7 26 4 3 2 1 1 742 PM Peak 15:00 17:00 17:00 12:00 15:00 16:00 14:00 16:00 12:00 17:00 14:00 16:00 13:00 17:00 Vol.6 1007 261 13 69 8 1 63 4 4 3 1 1 1396 Grand Total 41 8473 2046 171 662 59 2 327 36 20 11 6 4 11858 Percent 0.3%71.5%17.3%1.4%5.6%0.5%0.0%2.8%0.3%0.2%0.1%0.1%0.0% Page 1 Site Code: 2.5 Station ID: 2.5 HWY 82 W/O CR 154 (OLD HWY 82) All Traffic Data Services, Inc 9660 W 44th Ave Wheat Ridge,CO 80033 www.alltrafficdata.net WB Start 1 16 21 26 31 36 41 46 51 56 61 66 71 76 Time 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 999 Total 02/19/15 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 20 9 2 0 0 48 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 8 6 1 0 0 20 02:00 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 5 0 2 0 0 14 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 5 4 3 0 0 14 04:00 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 3 6 14 9 2 1 0 38 05:00 0 0 0 0 2 4 4 3 16 43 22 8 2 1 105 06:00 4 0 0 1 7 29 36 17 25 55 42 17 1 0 234 07:00 16 0 0 1 9 88 159 61 60 136 116 26 2 0 674 08:00 14 0 1 3 5 79 116 59 95 188 131 24 4 2 721 09:00 25 0 0 3 8 54 72 44 78 193 147 18 1 0 643 10:00 32 0 0 0 25 85 83 55 115 157 84 16 4 0 656 11:00 34 0 2 3 18 88 88 51 163 179 95 17 3 1 742 12 PM 44 0 0 3 28 79 105 57 161 193 80 6 0 0 756 13:00 40 0 1 3 25 87 61 59 168 171 65 7 0 0 687 14:00 33 0 0 1 26 95 100 89 213 178 57 7 0 0 799 15:00 56 0 1 2 40 141 180 86 208 259 82 13 2 0 1070 16:00 53 0 0 2 25 158 181 171 271 325 134 14 0 0 1334 17:00 50 0 0 5 26 201 219 145 288 335 113 14 0 0 1396 18:00 22 0 0 0 13 76 113 90 183 214 75 11 1 0 798 19:00 5 0 0 0 2 17 27 22 92 157 83 15 2 1 423 20:00 6 0 0 1 1 12 18 22 54 84 51 8 0 0 257 21:00 1 0 0 0 2 9 1 16 35 85 43 15 1 1 209 22:00 2 0 0 0 1 9 8 13 37 39 24 5 0 0 138 23:00 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 4 23 31 12 8 0 0 82 Total 440 0 5 29 265 1315 1573 1071 2313 3074 1484 259 24 6 11858 Daily 15th Percentile : 38 MPH 50th Percentile : 52 MPH 85th Percentile : 59 MPH 95th Percentile : 63 MPH Mean Speed(Average) : 50 MPH 10 MPH Pace Speed : 51-60 MPH Number in Pace : 5387 Percent in Pace : 45.5% Number of Vehicles > 55 MPH : 4847 Percent of Vehicles > 55 MPH : 40.9% Grand Total 440 0 5 29 265 1315 1573 1071 2313 3074 1484 259 24 6 11858 Overall 15th Percentile : 38 MPH 50th Percentile : 52 MPH 85th Percentile : 59 MPH 95th Percentile : 63 MPH Mean Speed(Average) : 50 MPH 10 MPH Pace Speed : 51-60 MPH Number in Pace : 5387 Percent in Pace : 45.5% Number of Vehicles > 55 MPH : 4847 Percent of Vehicles > 55 MPH : 40.9% Page 1 Site Code: 2 Station ID: 2 HWY 82 W/O CR 154 (OLD HWY 82) All Traffic Data Services, Inc 9660 W 44th Ave Wheat Ridge,CO 80033 www.alltrafficdata.net EB Start Cars &2 Axle 2 Axle 3 Axle 4 Axle <5 Axl 5 Axle >6 Axl <6 Axl 6 Axle >6 Axl Time Bikes Trailers Long Buses 6 Tire Single Single Double Double Double Multi Multi Multi Total 02/19/15 0 18 13 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35 01:00 0 17 5 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 25 02:00 0 2 10 3 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 03:00 0 7 14 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 27 04:00 3 20 25 7 11 2 0 7 2 0 0 0 0 77 05:00 2 57 99 15 132 2 0 8 2 0 0 1 0 318 06:00 13 303 282 23 274 5 2 29 0 0 0 0 0 931 07:00 14 743 210 12 86 5 1 13 3 1 1 2 1 1092 08:00 5 743 192 8 75 6 1 18 1 2 2 1 0 1054 09:00 1 507 135 5 36 7 1 10 4 0 0 0 0 706 10:00 1 484 95 8 26 9 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 627 11:00 7 513 110 2 23 12 0 3 4 0 0 0 0 674 12 PM 11 517 85 5 22 10 0 7 5 0 0 0 0 662 13:00 6 552 92 6 36 11 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 707 14:00 7 532 90 6 30 13 0 6 2 1 0 0 0 687 15:00 6 565 104 8 24 10 0 5 1 1 0 0 0 724 16:00 0 655 102 7 18 5 1 4 3 0 1 0 1 797 17:00 5 700 70 7 24 3 1 8 1 0 1 0 1 821 18:00 2 521 79 8 11 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 626 19:00 0 391 52 3 11 0 0 4 2 0 0 0 0 463 20:00 0 340 64 3 16 2 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 431 21:00 0 191 50 4 11 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 257 22:00 0 112 30 2 5 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 152 23:00 1 43 22 2 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 72 Total 84 8533 2030 146 888 106 9 134 38 5 5 5 3 11986 Percent 0.7%71.2%16.9%1.2%7.4%0.9%0.1%1.1%0.3%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0% AM Peak 07:00 07:00 06:00 06:00 06:00 11:00 06:00 06:00 09:00 08:00 08:00 07:00 07:00 07:00 Vol.14 743 282 23 274 12 2 29 4 2 2 2 1 1092 PM Peak 12:00 17:00 15:00 15:00 13:00 14:00 16:00 17:00 12:00 14:00 16:00 16:00 17:00 Vol.11 700 104 8 36 13 1 8 5 1 1 1 821 Grand Total 84 8533 2030 146 888 106 9 134 38 5 5 5 3 11986 Percent 0.7%71.2%16.9%1.2%7.4%0.9%0.1%1.1%0.3%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0% Page 1 Site Code: 2 Station ID: 2 HWY 82 W/O CR 154 (OLD HWY 82) All Traffic Data Services, Inc 9660 W 44th Ave Wheat Ridge,CO 80033 www.alltrafficdata.net EB Start 1 16 21 26 31 36 41 46 51 56 61 66 71 76 Time 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 999 Total 02/19/15 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 9 8 4 8 3 0 1 35 01:00 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 6 7 6 2 1 0 25 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 3 4 7 1 4 21 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 6 6 5 5 1 27 04:00 2 0 0 1 0 2 3 3 10 15 12 14 5 10 77 05:00 12 0 0 0 1 8 5 6 4 25 32 63 38 124 318 06:00 103 16 26 49 50 40 47 29 21 33 52 74 116 275 931 07:00 205 94 92 120 107 103 83 51 50 32 37 42 31 45 1092 08:00 110 33 58 57 98 75 77 101 116 121 102 56 28 22 1054 09:00 35 0 13 50 58 56 40 94 146 128 52 27 4 3 706 10:00 24 11 27 56 102 64 70 107 96 42 22 4 2 0 627 11:00 39 2 20 50 63 65 46 120 130 79 44 10 4 2 674 12 PM 43 6 19 47 77 77 66 87 110 69 33 17 7 4 662 13:00 51 14 25 35 66 62 61 95 113 103 43 27 8 4 707 14:00 42 11 6 48 56 59 52 87 136 93 56 26 11 4 687 15:00 35 7 29 58 93 75 60 77 130 80 36 28 11 5 724 16:00 44 5 24 42 77 84 72 83 169 123 53 13 5 3 797 17:00 41 14 35 56 93 81 51 93 149 125 57 17 7 2 821 18:00 17 1 9 48 68 60 45 84 129 102 47 14 2 0 626 19:00 8 5 9 17 42 36 36 75 106 81 32 11 4 1 463 20:00 3 1 3 19 36 30 37 80 101 67 41 10 3 0 431 21:00 3 0 1 1 17 17 7 14 51 70 52 12 8 4 257 22:00 2 0 0 2 4 7 6 12 34 37 34 11 2 1 152 23:00 0 0 0 4 4 4 1 5 15 12 12 9 3 3 72 Total 820 220 397 760 1113 1005 868 1314 1833 1457 873 502 306 518 11986 Daily 15th Percentile : 26 MPH 50th Percentile : 47 MPH 85th Percentile : 59 MPH 95th Percentile : 67 MPH Mean Speed(Average) : 44 MPH 10 MPH Pace Speed : 51-60 MPH Number in Pace : 3290 Percent in Pace : 28.7% Number of Vehicles > 55 MPH : 3656 Percent of Vehicles > 55 MPH : 31.9% Grand Total 820 220 397 760 1113 1005 868 1314 1833 1457 873 502 306 518 11986 Overall 15th Percentile : 26 MPH 50th Percentile : 47 MPH 85th Percentile : 59 MPH 95th Percentile : 67 MPH Mean Speed(Average) : 44 MPH 10 MPH Pace Speed : 51-60 MPH Number in Pace : 3290 Percent in Pace : 28.7% Number of Vehicles > 55 MPH : 3656 Percent of Vehicles > 55 MPH : 31.9% Page 1 Site Code: 3.5 Station ID: 3.5 HWY 82 E/O CR 154 (OLD HWY 82) All Traffic Data Services, Inc 9660 W 44th Ave Wheat Ridge,CO 80033 www.alltrafficdata.net WB Start Cars &2 Axle 2 Axle 3 Axle 4 Axle <5 Axl 5 Axle >6 Axl <6 Axl 6 Axle >6 Axl Time Bikes Trailers Long Buses 6 Tire Single Single Double Double Double Multi Multi Multi Total 02/19/15 0 31 7 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 42 01:00 0 16 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 02:00 0 6 2 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 03:00 0 8 5 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 04:00 0 25 7 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 05:00 0 73 26 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 103 06:00 0 135 46 2 2 10 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 198 07:00 0 476 88 0 12 8 0 2 2 1 0 0 1 590 08:00 0 563 44 3 6 5 1 0 6 2 0 0 0 630 09:00 0 515 41 2 12 12 0 2 6 0 0 0 0 590 10:00 0 533 46 1 11 3 0 4 4 0 1 0 2 605 11:00 0 643 37 5 13 9 0 3 4 0 1 0 1 716 12 PM 0 626 48 2 17 3 1 3 6 0 0 0 1 707 13:00 0 557 41 2 12 9 0 7 8 1 0 0 1 638 14:00 0 669 58 2 15 7 1 6 4 0 0 0 1 763 15:00 0 935 73 3 12 6 0 6 3 0 0 0 1 1039 16:00 0 1182 89 3 15 15 1 9 1 1 1 1 0 1318 17:00 0 1225 62 6 6 9 0 8 1 2 2 0 2 1323 18:00 0 674 33 1 11 4 0 1 5 0 0 0 0 729 19:00 0 337 28 2 5 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 376 20:00 0 215 11 4 3 1 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 239 21:00 0 170 17 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 194 22:00 0 115 10 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 128 23:00 0 56 14 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 74 Total 0 9785 835 40 171 108 5 51 66 7 5 1 10 11084 Percent 0.0%88.3%7.5%0.4%1.5%1.0%0.0%0.5%0.6%0.1%0.0%0.0%0.1% AM Peak 11:00 07:00 11:00 11:00 09:00 08:00 10:00 08:00 08:00 10:00 10:00 11:00 Vol. 643 88 5 13 12 1 4 6 2 1 2 716 PM Peak 17:00 16:00 17:00 12:00 16:00 12:00 16:00 13:00 17:00 17:00 16:00 17:00 17:00 Vol. 1225 89 6 17 15 1 9 8 2 2 1 2 1323 Grand Total 0 9785 835 40 171 108 5 51 66 7 5 1 10 11084 Percent 0.0%88.3%7.5%0.4%1.5%1.0%0.0%0.5%0.6%0.1%0.0%0.0%0.1% Page 1 Site Code: 3.5 Station ID: 3.5 HWY 82 E/O CR 154 (OLD HWY 82) All Traffic Data Services, Inc 9660 W 44th Ave Wheat Ridge,CO 80033 www.alltrafficdata.net WB Start 1 16 21 26 31 36 41 46 51 56 61 66 71 76 Time 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 999 Total 02/19/15 0 0 0 0 0 4 23 13 2 0 0 0 0 0 42 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 7 11 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 2 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 2 8 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 04:00 0 0 0 0 2 3 19 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 34 05:00 0 0 0 0 1 8 48 43 3 0 0 0 0 0 103 06:00 0 0 0 0 2 14 102 76 4 0 0 0 0 0 198 07:00 9 0 0 0 3 46 292 224 16 0 0 0 0 0 590 08:00 16 0 1 0 0 12 234 323 43 1 0 0 0 0 630 09:00 12 0 0 0 0 10 148 343 75 2 0 0 0 0 590 10:00 18 0 0 0 0 7 180 313 82 5 0 0 0 0 605 11:00 15 0 0 0 1 7 199 391 100 3 0 0 0 0 716 12 PM 29 0 0 1 0 12 188 384 87 6 0 0 0 0 707 13:00 15 0 0 0 1 12 146 367 92 5 0 0 0 0 638 14:00 17 0 0 0 0 19 218 398 110 1 0 0 0 0 763 15:00 35 0 0 0 1 12 306 568 112 5 0 0 0 0 1039 16:00 29 0 0 0 3 60 463 633 128 2 0 0 0 0 1318 17:00 31 0 1 0 0 45 569 610 64 3 0 0 0 0 1323 18:00 10 0 0 0 1 59 291 334 34 0 0 0 0 0 729 19:00 6 0 0 0 2 35 155 154 22 1 1 0 0 0 376 20:00 2 0 0 0 3 24 104 101 4 1 0 0 0 0 239 21:00 2 0 0 0 1 15 92 76 6 2 0 0 0 0 194 22:00 3 0 0 0 1 17 67 39 1 0 0 0 0 0 128 23:00 0 0 0 0 0 12 36 25 1 0 0 0 0 0 74 Total 249 0 2 1 22 444 3907 5434 987 37 1 0 0 0 11084 Daily 15th Percentile : 41 MPH 50th Percentile : 45 MPH 85th Percentile : 49 MPH 95th Percentile : 52 MPH Mean Speed(Average) : 45 MPH 10 MPH Pace Speed : 41-50 MPH Number in Pace : 9341 Percent in Pace : 84.3% Number of Vehicles > 55 MPH : 38 Percent of Vehicles > 55 MPH : 0.3% Grand Total 249 0 2 1 22 444 3907 5434 987 37 1 0 0 0 11084 Overall 15th Percentile : 41 MPH 50th Percentile : 45 MPH 85th Percentile : 49 MPH 95th Percentile : 52 MPH Mean Speed(Average) : 45 MPH 10 MPH Pace Speed : 41-50 MPH Number in Pace : 9341 Percent in Pace : 84.3% Number of Vehicles > 55 MPH : 38 Percent of Vehicles > 55 MPH : 0.3% Page 1 Site Code: 3 Station ID: 3 HWY 82 E/O CR 154 (OLD HWY 82) All Traffic Data Services, Inc 9660 W 44th Ave Wheat Ridge,CO 80033 www.alltrafficdata.net EB Start Cars &2 Axle 2 Axle 3 Axle 4 Axle <5 Axl 5 Axle >6 Axl <6 Axl 6 Axle >6 Axl Time Bikes Trailers Long Buses 6 Tire Single Single Double Double Double Multi Multi Multi Total 02/19/15 0 30 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 01:00 0 18 4 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 02:00 0 13 4 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 03:00 1 20 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 04:00 0 42 10 4 5 0 0 10 2 0 0 0 0 73 05:00 0 210 80 10 9 2 0 11 3 0 0 2 0 327 06:00 1 542 209 14 46 13 4 32 3 3 0 1 1 869 07:00 12 751 171 9 31 15 0 30 6 5 2 3 1 1036 08:00 10 670 190 8 36 13 1 23 0 1 3 1 1 957 09:00 3 427 120 10 36 6 0 25 3 1 3 1 0 635 10:00 0 386 108 5 42 6 0 9 4 0 0 0 0 560 11:00 5 442 103 8 18 9 0 8 8 1 0 0 0 602 12 PM 1 450 86 7 16 5 0 11 2 0 0 0 1 579 13:00 3 489 100 7 18 6 0 9 3 2 1 0 0 638 14:00 3 470 81 11 18 7 1 10 2 1 2 0 1 607 15:00 3 481 103 6 23 5 0 8 1 1 0 1 0 632 16:00 2 583 71 8 19 5 0 11 3 1 1 0 0 704 17:00 6 599 75 7 17 3 2 10 0 1 1 0 0 721 18:00 0 441 65 9 10 0 0 8 2 0 2 0 0 537 19:00 2 338 51 3 7 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 405 20:00 0 296 54 3 6 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 364 21:00 2 190 28 2 2 2 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 229 22:00 1 115 15 2 2 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 139 23:00 0 49 6 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 59 Total 55 8052 1739 138 368 100 8 223 48 17 15 10 5 10778 Percent 0.5%74.7%16.1%1.3%3.4%0.9%0.1%2.1%0.4%0.2%0.1%0.1%0.0% AM Peak 07:00 07:00 06:00 06:00 06:00 07:00 06:00 06:00 11:00 07:00 08:00 07:00 06:00 07:00 Vol.12 751 209 14 46 15 4 32 8 5 3 3 1 1036 PM Peak 17:00 17:00 15:00 14:00 15:00 14:00 17:00 12:00 13:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 12:00 17:00 Vol.6 599 103 11 23 7 2 11 3 2 2 1 1 721 Grand Total 55 8052 1739 138 368 100 8 223 48 17 15 10 5 10778 Percent 0.5%74.7%16.1%1.3%3.4%0.9%0.1%2.1%0.4%0.2%0.1%0.1%0.0% Page 1 Site Code: 3 Station ID: 3 HWY 82 E/O CR 154 (OLD HWY 82) All Traffic Data Services, Inc 9660 W 44th Ave Wheat Ridge,CO 80033 www.alltrafficdata.net EB Start 1 16 21 26 31 36 41 46 51 56 61 66 71 76 Time 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 999 Total 02/19/15 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 15 13 0 2 0 0 0 33 01:00 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 5 13 2 1 1 0 0 25 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 11 3 1 0 0 0 21 03:00 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 3 15 3 0 0 0 0 26 04:00 3 0 0 1 0 1 5 22 25 13 3 0 0 0 73 05:00 6 0 1 0 1 3 7 41 109 115 38 5 1 0 327 06:00 27 0 3 3 29 146 77 47 180 256 95 6 0 0 869 07:00 58 0 6 20 63 318 222 88 139 91 29 2 0 0 1036 08:00 50 0 0 6 49 145 122 127 226 191 38 3 0 0 957 09:00 22 0 1 0 21 86 34 65 203 153 46 4 0 0 635 10:00 11 0 0 2 29 84 50 91 172 96 25 0 0 0 560 11:00 26 0 1 7 30 44 49 72 146 168 57 0 2 0 602 12 PM 16 0 1 5 21 81 60 69 123 146 49 7 1 0 579 13:00 18 0 2 5 23 72 63 53 180 180 38 4 0 0 638 14:00 24 0 0 4 27 56 47 59 179 165 40 5 1 0 607 15:00 22 0 0 7 46 101 48 48 143 162 53 2 0 0 632 16:00 27 0 3 3 27 96 48 71 193 195 35 5 0 1 704 17:00 25 0 0 3 21 81 88 83 222 157 36 5 0 0 721 18:00 7 0 0 6 16 57 47 77 191 117 17 2 0 0 537 19:00 11 0 0 3 13 23 22 75 155 83 17 3 0 0 405 20:00 1 0 0 0 6 22 21 80 140 84 10 0 0 0 364 21:00 3 0 0 0 5 9 9 38 107 48 9 1 0 0 229 22:00 2 0 0 0 0 3 8 28 63 27 8 0 0 0 139 23:00 1 0 0 1 1 1 3 13 29 7 3 0 0 0 59 Total 361 1 19 76 428 1431 1037 1275 2977 2462 650 55 5 1 10778 Daily 15th Percentile : 37 MPH 50th Percentile : 51 MPH 85th Percentile : 58 MPH 95th Percentile : 61 MPH Mean Speed(Average) : 49 MPH 10 MPH Pace Speed : 51-60 MPH Number in Pace : 5439 Percent in Pace : 50.5% Number of Vehicles > 55 MPH : 3173 Percent of Vehicles > 55 MPH : 29.4% Grand Total 361 1 19 76 428 1431 1037 1275 2977 2462 650 55 5 1 10778 Overall 15th Percentile : 37 MPH 50th Percentile : 51 MPH 85th Percentile : 58 MPH 95th Percentile : 61 MPH Mean Speed(Average) : 49 MPH 10 MPH Pace Speed : 51-60 MPH Number in Pace : 5439 Percent in Pace : 50.5% Number of Vehicles > 55 MPH : 3173 Percent of Vehicles > 55 MPH : 29.4% Page 1 Site Code: 4 Station ID: 4 CR 154 (OLD HWY 82) S/O HWY 82 CR 154 (OLD HWY 82) S/O HWY 82 All Traffic Data Services, Inc 9660 W 44th Ave Wheat Ridge,CO 80033 www.alltrafficdata.net NB Start Cars &2 Axle 2 Axle 3 Axle 4 Axle <5 Axl 5 Axle >6 Axl <6 Axl 6 Axle >6 Axl Time Bikes Trailers Long Buses 6 Tire Single Single Double Double Double Multi Multi Multi Total 02/19/15 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 04:00 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 05:00 0 7 1 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 06:00 0 40 6 0 10 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 58 07:00 0 95 41 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 143 08:00 1 52 21 0 9 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 86 09:00 0 42 20 1 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 72 10:00 0 55 25 0 3 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 86 11:00 1 42 20 0 8 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 73 12 PM 1 52 19 1 5 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 80 13:00 0 60 23 0 6 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 93 14:00 0 44 24 1 6 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 76 15:00 0 56 22 1 14 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 94 16:00 0 70 29 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 107 17:00 2 82 33 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 130 18:00 0 42 15 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 64 19:00 0 16 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 20:00 0 14 6 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 21:00 0 9 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 22:00 0 8 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 23:00 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Total 5 791 315 6 109 10 0 7 2 1 0 0 0 1246 Percent 0.4%63.5%25.3%0.5%8.7%0.8%0.0%0.6%0.2%0.1%0.0%0.0%0.0% AM Peak 08:00 07:00 07:00 07:00 06:00 06:00 08:00 07:00 Vol.1 95 41 2 10 2 2 143 PM Peak 17:00 17:00 17:00 12:00 15:00 13:00 13:00 12:00 13:00 17:00 Vol.2 82 33 1 14 2 1 1 1 130 Grand Total 5 791 315 6 109 10 0 7 2 1 0 0 0 1246 Percent 0.4%63.5%25.3%0.5%8.7%0.8%0.0%0.6%0.2%0.1%0.0%0.0%0.0% Page 2 Site Code: 4 Station ID: 4 CR 154 (OLD HWY 82) S/O HWY 82 CR 154 (OLD HWY 82) S/O HWY 82 All Traffic Data Services, Inc 9660 W 44th Ave Wheat Ridge,CO 80033 www.alltrafficdata.net SB Start Cars &2 Axle 2 Axle 3 Axle 4 Axle <5 Axl 5 Axle >6 Axl <6 Axl 6 Axle >6 Axl Time Bikes Trailers Long Buses 6 Tire Single Single Double Double Double Multi Multi Multi Total 02/19/15 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 01:00 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 02:00 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 03:00 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 04:00 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 05:00 0 6 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 06:00 0 22 17 1 7 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 48 07:00 1 34 20 1 7 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 65 08:00 1 35 18 1 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 64 09:00 0 32 20 0 5 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 59 10:00 0 45 17 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 67 11:00 0 41 15 0 4 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 65 12 PM 0 49 22 1 7 1 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 85 13:00 0 59 15 0 4 2 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 83 14:00 0 54 15 2 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 78 15:00 0 60 16 1 12 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 90 16:00 0 68 18 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 93 17:00 1 81 26 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 110 18:00 0 68 11 0 7 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 87 19:00 0 51 15 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 67 20:00 0 46 10 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 58 21:00 0 17 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 22:00 0 9 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 23:00 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 Total 3 788 270 7 86 13 0 9 4 0 0 0 0 1180 Percent 0.3%66.8%22.9%0.6%7.3%1.1%0.0%0.8%0.3%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0% AM Peak 07:00 10:00 07:00 06:00 06:00 11:00 06:00 11:00 10:00 Vol.1 45 20 1 7 4 1 1 67 PM Peak 17:00 17:00 17:00 14:00 15:00 13:00 12:00 12:00 17:00 Vol.1 81 26 2 12 2 3 2 110 Grand Total 3 788 270 7 86 13 0 9 4 0 0 0 0 1180 Percent 0.3%66.8%22.9%0.6%7.3%1.1%0.0%0.8%0.3%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0% Page 1 Site Code: 4 Station ID: 4 CR 154 (OLD HWY 82) S/O HWY 82 CR 154 (OLD HWY 82) S/O HWY 82 All Traffic Data Services, Inc 9660 W 44th Ave Wheat Ridge,CO 80033 www.alltrafficdata.net NB Start 1 16 21 26 31 36 41 46 51 56 61 66 71 76 Time 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 999 Total 02/19/15 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 04:00 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 05:00 1 0 0 1 1 4 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 06:00 6 0 0 3 12 23 12 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 58 07:00 1 1 0 2 25 68 37 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 143 08:00 1 3 1 4 16 27 30 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 86 09:00 0 3 1 6 19 28 14 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 72 10:00 0 1 5 8 32 33 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 86 11:00 1 2 1 7 31 20 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 73 12 PM 4 1 1 10 22 28 12 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 80 13:00 1 1 3 14 21 41 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 93 14:00 0 2 5 6 27 19 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 76 15:00 7 1 2 14 28 31 9 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 94 16:00 3 2 2 9 43 32 14 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 107 17:00 1 1 2 10 55 49 10 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 130 18:00 0 2 3 12 20 16 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 64 19:00 0 0 2 2 6 5 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 20:00 0 1 0 2 8 7 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 21:00 0 0 0 1 7 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 22:00 0 0 0 2 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 23:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Total 26 21 28 113 382 440 209 23 4 0 0 0 0 0 1246 Daily 15th Percentile : 29 MPH 50th Percentile : 35 MPH 85th Percentile : 41 MPH 95th Percentile : 44 MPH Mean Speed(Average) : 35 MPH 10 MPH Pace Speed : 31-40 MPH Number in Pace : 822 Percent in Pace : 66.0% Number of Vehicles > 55 MPH : 0 Percent of Vehicles > 55 MPH : 0.0% Grand Total 26 21 28 113 382 440 209 23 4 0 0 0 0 0 1246 Overall 15th Percentile : 29 MPH 50th Percentile : 35 MPH 85th Percentile : 41 MPH 95th Percentile : 44 MPH Mean Speed(Average) : 35 MPH 10 MPH Pace Speed : 31-40 MPH Number in Pace : 822 Percent in Pace : 66.0% Number of Vehicles > 55 MPH : 0 Percent of Vehicles > 55 MPH : 0.0% Page 2 Site Code: 4 Station ID: 4 CR 154 (OLD HWY 82) S/O HWY 82 CR 154 (OLD HWY 82) S/O HWY 82 All Traffic Data Services, Inc 9660 W 44th Ave Wheat Ridge,CO 80033 www.alltrafficdata.net SB Start 1 16 21 26 31 36 41 46 51 56 61 66 71 76 Time 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 999 Total 02/19/15 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 01:00 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 02:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 03:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 04:00 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 05:00 0 2 3 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 06:00 2 0 4 16 16 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 07:00 1 2 3 18 29 11 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 65 08:00 2 0 5 18 29 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 64 09:00 0 1 6 19 23 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 59 10:00 0 2 1 18 28 15 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 67 11:00 0 1 9 17 29 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 65 12 PM 1 1 6 14 23 11 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 57 13:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 6 9 39 127 180 72 10 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 444 Daily 15th Percentile : 25 MPH 50th Percentile : 31 MPH 85th Percentile : 36 MPH 95th Percentile : 39 MPH Mean Speed(Average) : 31 MPH 10 MPH Pace Speed : 26-35 MPH Number in Pace : 307 Percent in Pace : 69.1% Number of Vehicles > 55 MPH : 0 Percent of Vehicles > 55 MPH : 0.0% Grand Total 6 9 39 127 180 72 10 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 444 Overall 15th Percentile : 25 MPH 50th Percentile : 31 MPH 85th Percentile : 36 MPH 95th Percentile : 39 MPH Mean Speed(Average) : 31 MPH 10 MPH Pace Speed : 26-35 MPH Number in Pace : 307 Percent in Pace : 69.1% Number of Vehicles > 55 MPH : 0 Percent of Vehicles > 55 MPH : 0.0% APPENDIX B Intersection and Queuing Calculation Sheets HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Existing AM 1: State Hwy 82 & County Rd 154 3/6/2015 Fedex Ground Station Synchro 8 Report Rick Engineering Co.Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (veh/h)149 010001 6 5 5001226 65 Number 3 8 18 7 4 14 1 6 16 5 2 12 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1484 1484 1900 1863 1900 1484 1484 0 0 1484 1484 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 160 010001 7 0 4001318 70 Adj No. of Lanes 011010120021 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.92 0.92 0.93 0.93 Percent Heavy Veh, % 28 28 28 2 2 2 28 28 0 0 28 28 Cap, veh/h 179 0 160 01022199 0 0 2115 946 Arrive On Green 0.13 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.78 0.00 0.00 0.75 0.75 Sat Flow, veh/h 1414 0 1262 0 1863 0 1414 2895 0 0 2895 1262 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 160 010001 7 0 4001318 70 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1414 0 1262 0 1863 0 1414 1410 0 0 1410 1262 Q Serve(g_s), s 15.5 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 10.2 0.0 0.0 30.6 2.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 15.5 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 10.2 0.0 0.0 30.6 2.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 179 0 160 01022199 0 0 2115 946 V/C Ratio(X) 0.89 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.65 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.62 0.07 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 198 0 177 0 60 0 41 2277 0 0 2115 946 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 59.9 0.0 53.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.6 4.5 0.0 0.0 8.2 4.6 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 35.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 254.6 0.4 0.0 0.0 1.4 0.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(-26165%),veh/ln 7.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 4.0 0.0 0.0 12.1 0.7 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 95.1 0.0 53.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 324.2 4.9 0.0 0.0 9.6 4.8 LnGrp LOS F D F A A A Approach Vol, veh/h 161 0 705 1388 Approach Delay, s/veh 94.8 0.0 5.3 9.3 Approach LOS F A A Timer 12345678 Assigned Phs 1 2468 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 4.2 112.0 0.0 116.2 23.2 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 7.5 5.5 7.5 5.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.0 104.5 4.5 112.5 19.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.1 32.6 0.0 12.2 17.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 68.2 0.0 93.2 0.2 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 14.2 HCM 2010 LOS B Notes User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green. HCM 2010 TWSC Existing AM 3: County Rd 154 & Driveway 3/6/2015 Fedex Ground Station Synchro 8 Report Rick Engineering Co.Page 3 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.3 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 5 1 1 149 60 5 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 -- -- - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 -- 0 0 - Grade, %0 -- 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 Heavy Vehicles, %28 28 28 28 28 28 Mvmt Flow 5 1 1 160 65 5 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 229 67 70 0 - 0 Stage 1 67 -- -- - Stage 2 162 -- -- - Critical Hdwy 6.68 6.48 4.38 -- - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.68 -- -- - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.68 -- -- - Follow-up Hdwy 3.752 3.552 2.452 -- - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 705 928 1381 -- - Stage 1 894 -- -- - Stage 2 808 -- -- - Platoon blocked, %-- - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 704 928 1381 -- - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 704 -- -- - Stage 1 894 -- -- - Stage 2 807 -- -- - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 9.9 0.1 0 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBTEBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h)1381 - 734 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.001 - 0.009 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 7.6 0 9.9 - - HCM Lane LOS A A A - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0 - - Queuing and Blocking Report Existing AM 3/6/2015 Fedex Ground Station SimTraffic Report Rick Engineering Co.Page 1 Intersection: 1: State Hwy 82 & County Rd 154 Movement EB NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served LT TTTTR Maximum Queue (ft) 299 230 226 309 293 54 Average Queue (ft) 166 96 43 160 118 11 95th Queue (ft)270 197 136 263 216 38 Link Distance (ft)985 1202 1202 772 772 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)675 Storage Blk Time (%) 24 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Intersection: 3: County Rd 154 & Driveway Movement EB Directions Served LR Maximum Queue (ft)53 Average Queue (ft)6 95th Queue (ft)31 Link Distance (ft)187 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 0 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Existing PM 1: State Hwy 82 & County Rd 154 3/6/2015 Fedex Ground Station Synchro 8 Report Rick Engineering Co.Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (veh/h)128 0100011479 0 0 797 112 Number 3 8 18 7 4 14 1 6 16 5 2 12 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1484 1484 1900 1863 1900 1484 1484 0 0 1484 1484 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 142 0100011643 0 0 886 124 Adj No. of Lanes 011010120021 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.92 0.92 0.90 0.90 Percent Heavy Veh, % 28 28 28 2 2 2 28 28 0 0 28 28 Cap, veh/h 162 0 145 01022234 0 0 2150 962 Arrive On Green 0.11 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.79 0.00 0.00 0.76 0.76 Sat Flow, veh/h 1414 0 1262 0 1863 0 1414 2895 0 0 2895 1262 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 142 0100011643 0 0 886 124 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1414 0 1262 0 1863 0 1414 1410 0 0 1410 1262 Q Serve(g_s), s 13.8 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 40.5 0.0 0.0 15.2 3.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 13.8 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 40.5 0.0 0.0 15.2 3.6 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 162 0 145 01022234 0 0 2150 962 V/C Ratio(X) 0.88 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.65 0.74 0.00 0.00 0.41 0.13 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 197 0 176 0 60 0 40 2272 0 0 2150 962 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 60.8 0.0 54.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.7 7.2 0.0 0.0 5.7 4.4 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 30.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 254.6 2.2 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.3 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(-26165%),veh/ln 6.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 16.2 0.0 0.0 6.0 1.3 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 91.7 0.0 54.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 324.4 9.4 0.0 0.0 6.3 4.6 LnGrp LOS F D F A A A Approach Vol, veh/h 143 0 1644 1010 Approach Delay, s/veh 91.5 0.0 9.6 6.1 Approach LOS F A A Timer 12345678 Assigned Phs 1 2468 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 4.2 114.0 0.0 118.1 21.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 7.5 5.5 7.5 5.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.0 104.5 4.5 112.5 19.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.1 17.2 0.0 42.5 15.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 86.2 0.0 68.1 0.3 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 12.5 HCM 2010 LOS B Notes User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green. HCM 2010 TWSC Existing PM 3: County Rd 154 & Driveway 3/6/2015 Fedex Ground Station Synchro 8 Report Rick Engineering Co.Page 3 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.1 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 1 1 1 124 112 4 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 -- -- - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 -- 0 0 - Grade, %0 -- 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 Heavy Vehicles, %28 28 28 28 28 28 Mvmt Flow 1 1 1 138 124 4 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 267 127 129 0 - 0 Stage 1 127 -- -- - Stage 2 140 -- -- - Critical Hdwy 6.68 6.48 4.38 -- - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.68 -- -- - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.68 -- -- - Follow-up Hdwy 3.752 3.552 2.452 -- - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 670 858 1311 -- - Stage 1 838 -- -- - Stage 2 827 -- -- - Platoon blocked, %-- - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 669 858 1311 -- - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 669 -- -- - Stage 1 838 -- -- - Stage 2 826 -- -- - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 9.8 0.1 0 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBTEBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h)1311 - 752 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.001 - 0.003 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 7.7 0 9.8 - - HCM Lane LOS A A A - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0 - - Queuing and Blocking Report Existing PM 3/6/2015 Fedex Ground Station SimTraffic Report Rick Engineering Co.Page 1 Intersection: 1: State Hwy 82 & County Rd 154 Movement EB EB NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served LT R TTTTR Maximum Queue (ft) 366 26 456 431 256 212 51 Average Queue (ft) 183 3 213 183 126 70 20 95th Queue (ft)339 15 368 335 220 183 52 Link Distance (ft)985 1202 1202 772 772 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)125 675 Storage Blk Time (%) 32 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Intersection: 3: County Rd 154 & Driveway Movement EB Directions Served LR Maximum Queue (ft)27 Average Queue (ft)2 95th Queue (ft)13 Link Distance (ft)187 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 0 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2016 No Project AM 1: State Hwy 82 & County Rd 154 3/6/2015 Fedex Ground Station Synchro 8 Report Rick Engineering Co.Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (veh/h)152 020002 7 6 3001337 66 Number 3 8 18 7 4 14 1 6 16 5 2 12 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1484 1484 1900 1863 1900 1484 1484 0 0 1484 1484 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 163 020002 8 2 0001438 71 Adj No. of Lanes 011010120021 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.92 0.92 0.93 0.93 Percent Heavy Veh, % 28 28 28 2 2 2 28 28 0 0 28 28 Cap, veh/h 195 0 174 01032172 0 0 2086 933 Arrive On Green 0.14 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.77 0.00 0.00 0.74 0.74 Sat Flow, veh/h 1414 0 1262 0 1863 0 1414 2895 0 0 2895 1262 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 163 020002 8 2 0001438 71 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1414 0 1262 0 1863 0 1414 1410 0 0 1410 1262 Q Serve(g_s), s 15.9 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 13.3 0.0 0.0 38.3 2.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 15.9 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 13.3 0.0 0.0 38.3 2.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 195 0 174 01032172 0 0 2086 933 V/C Ratio(X) 0.84 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.66 0.38 0.00 0.00 0.69 0.08 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 195 0 174 0 59 0 40 2245 0 0 2086 933 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 59.4 0.0 52.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 70.5 5.3 0.0 0.0 9.8 5.1 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 32.6 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 169.8 0.5 0.0 0.0 1.9 0.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(-26165%),veh/ln 8.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 5.3 0.0 0.0 15.3 0.8 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 92.0 0.0 52.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 240.2 5.8 0.0 0.0 11.7 5.2 LnGrp LOS F D F A B A Approach Vol, veh/h 165 0 822 1509 Approach Delay, s/veh 91.5 0.0 6.3 11.4 Approach LOS F A B Timer 12345678 Assigned Phs 1 2468 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 4.3 112.1 0.0 116.4 25.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 7.5 5.5 7.5 5.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.0 104.5 4.5 112.5 19.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.2 40.3 0.0 15.3 17.9 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 62.6 0.0 93.5 0.2 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 15.0 HCM 2010 LOS B Notes User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green. HCM 2010 TWSC 2016 No Project AM 3: County Rd 154 & Driveway 3/6/2015 Fedex Ground Station Synchro 8 Report Rick Engineering Co.Page 3 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.1 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 2 1 1 152 61 6 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 -- -- - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 -- 0 0 - Grade, %0 -- 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 Heavy Vehicles, %28 28 28 28 28 28 Mvmt Flow 2 1 1 163 66 6 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 235 69 72 0 - 0 Stage 1 69 -- -- - Stage 2 166 -- -- - Critical Hdwy 6.68 6.48 4.38 -- - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.68 -- -- - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.68 -- -- - Follow-up Hdwy 3.752 3.552 2.452 -- - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 699 926 1378 -- - Stage 1 892 -- -- - Stage 2 804 -- -- - Platoon blocked, %-- - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 698 926 1378 -- - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 698 -- -- - Stage 1 892 -- -- - Stage 2 803 -- -- - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 9.8 0 0 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBTEBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h)1378 - 760 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.001 - 0.004 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 7.6 0 9.8 - - HCM Lane LOS A A A - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0 - - Queuing and Blocking Report 2016 No Project AM 3/6/2015 Fedex Ground Station SimTraffic Report Rick Engineering Co.Page 1 Intersection: 1: State Hwy 82 & County Rd 154 Movement EB EB NB NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served LT R L TTTTR Maximum Queue (ft) 303 150 19 228 181 422 424 68 Average Queue (ft) 193 11 1 143 74 266 205 14 95th Queue (ft)295 73 6 217 168 409 338 43 Link Distance (ft)985 1202 1202 772 772 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)125 760 675 Storage Blk Time (%) 35 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 0 Intersection: 3: County Rd 154 & Driveway Movement EB Directions Served LR Maximum Queue (ft)77 Average Queue (ft)6 95th Queue (ft)35 Link Distance (ft)187 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 1 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2016 No Project PM 1: State Hwy 82 & County Rd 154 3/6/2015 Fedex Ground Station Synchro 8 Report Rick Engineering Co.Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (veh/h)131 0200021616 0 0 901 114 Number 3 8 18 7 4 14 1 6 16 5 2 12 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1484 1484 1900 1863 1900 1484 1484 0 0 1484 1484 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 146 0200021796 0 0 1001 127 Adj No. of Lanes 011010120021 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.90 0.90 0.92 0.92 0.90 0.90 Percent Heavy Veh, % 28 28 28 2 2 2 28 28 0 0 28 28 Cap, veh/h 166 0 148 01032228 0 0 2142 958 Arrive On Green 0.12 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.79 0.00 0.00 0.76 0.76 Sat Flow, veh/h 1414 0 1262 0 1863 0 1414 2895 0 0 2895 1262 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 146 0200021796 0 0 1001 127 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1414 0 1262 0 1863 0 1414 1410 0 0 1410 1262 Q Serve(g_s), s 14.3 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 51.7 0.0 0.0 18.6 3.8 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 14.3 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 51.7 0.0 0.0 18.6 3.8 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 166 0 148 01032228 0 0 2142 958 V/C Ratio(X) 0.88 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.66 0.81 0.00 0.00 0.47 0.13 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 196 0 175 0 60 0 40 2259 0 0 2142 958 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 61.0 0.0 54.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 70.0 8.5 0.0 0.0 6.3 4.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 32.2 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 169.7 3.2 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.3 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(-26165%),veh/ln 7.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 20.7 0.0 0.0 7.3 1.4 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 93.3 0.0 54.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 239.7 11.8 0.0 0.0 7.0 4.8 LnGrp LOS F D F B A A Approach Vol, veh/h 148 0 1798 1128 Approach Delay, s/veh 92.8 0.0 12.0 6.8 Approach LOS F B A Timer 12345678 Assigned Phs 1 2468 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 4.3 114.2 0.0 118.5 22.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 7.5 5.5 7.5 5.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.0 104.5 4.5 112.5 19.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.2 20.6 0.0 53.7 16.3 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 83.4 0.0 57.3 0.3 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 14.0 HCM 2010 LOS B Notes User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green. HCM 2010 TWSC 2016 No Project PM 3: County Rd 154 & Driveway 3/6/2015 Fedex Ground Station Synchro 8 Report Rick Engineering Co.Page 3 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.2 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 2 1 1 126 114 5 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 -- -- - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 -- 0 0 - Grade, %0 -- 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 Heavy Vehicles, %28 28 28 28 28 28 Mvmt Flow 2 1 1 140 127 6 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 271 129 132 0 - 0 Stage 1 129 -- -- - Stage 2 142 -- -- - Critical Hdwy 6.68 6.48 4.38 -- - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.68 -- -- - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.68 -- -- - Follow-up Hdwy 3.752 3.552 2.452 -- - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 666 856 1307 -- - Stage 1 837 -- -- - Stage 2 825 -- -- - Platoon blocked, %-- - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 665 856 1307 -- - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 665 -- -- - Stage 1 837 -- -- - Stage 2 824 -- -- - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 10 0.1 0 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBTEBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h)1307 - 718 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.001 - 0.005 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 7.8 0 10 - - HCM Lane LOS A A B - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0 - - Queuing and Blocking Report 2016 No Project PM 3/6/2015 Fedex Ground Station SimTraffic Report Rick Engineering Co.Page 1 Intersection: 1: State Hwy 82 & County Rd 154 Movement EB EB NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served LT R TTTTR Maximum Queue (ft) 292 150 300 369 212 210 90 Average Queue (ft) 157 7 171 130 111 68 18 95th Queue (ft)249 53 280 264 208 160 55 Link Distance (ft)985 1202 1202 772 772 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)125 675 Storage Blk Time (%) 22 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Intersection: 3: County Rd 154 & Driveway Movement EB Directions Served LR Maximum Queue (ft)29 Average Queue (ft)2 95th Queue (ft)14 Link Distance (ft)187 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 0 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2016 With Project AM 1: State Hwy 82 & County Rd 154 3/6/2015 Fedex Ground Station Synchro 8 Report Rick Engineering Co.Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (veh/h)166 0 10 0 0 0 11 763 0 0 1337 80 Number 3 8 18 7 4 14 1 6 16 5 2 12 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1484 1484 1900 1863 1900 1484 1484 0 0 1484 1484 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 178 0 11 0 0 0 12 820 0 0 1438 86 Adj No. of Lanes 011010120021 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.92 0.92 0.93 0.93 Percent Heavy Veh, % 28 28 28 2 2 2 28 28 0 0 28 28 Cap, veh/h 195 0 174 0 1 0 15 2173 0 0 2063 923 Arrive On Green 0.14 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.77 0.00 0.00 0.73 0.73 Sat Flow, veh/h 1414 0 1262 0 1863 0 1414 2895 0 0 2895 1262 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 178 0 11 0 0 0 12 820 0 0 1438 86 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1414 0 1262 0 1863 0 1414 1410 0 0 1410 1262 Q Serve(g_s), s 17.6 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 13.3 0.0 0.0 39.5 2.8 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 17.6 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 13.3 0.0 0.0 39.5 2.8 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 195 0 174 0 1 0 15 2173 0 0 2063 923 V/C Ratio(X) 0.91 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.80 0.38 0.00 0.00 0.70 0.09 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 195 0 174 0 59 0 40 2241 0 0 2082 931 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 60.2 0.0 53.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.9 5.3 0.0 0.0 10.4 5.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 41.7 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 78.4 0.5 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(-26165%),veh/ln 9.1 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 5.3 0.0 0.0 15.7 1.0 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 101.9 0.0 53.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 148.3 5.8 0.0 0.0 12.4 5.7 LnGrp LOS F D F A B A Approach Vol, veh/h 189 0 832 1524 Approach Delay, s/veh 99.1 0.0 7.8 12.0 Approach LOS F A B Timer 12345678 Assigned Phs 1 2468 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 5.5 111.1 0.0 116.6 25.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 7.5 5.5 7.5 5.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.0 104.5 4.5 112.5 19.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.2 41.5 0.0 15.3 19.6 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 61.5 0.0 93.7 0.0 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 17.1 HCM 2010 LOS B Notes User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green. HCM 2010 TWSC 2016 With Project AM 3: County Rd 154 & Driveway 3/6/2015 Fedex Ground Station Synchro 8 Report Rick Engineering Co.Page 3 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.2 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 28 2 2 152 61 29 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 -- -- - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 -- 0 0 - Grade, %0 -- 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 Heavy Vehicles, %28 28 28 28 28 28 Mvmt Flow 30 2 2 163 66 31 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 249 81 97 0 - 0 Stage 1 81 -- -- - Stage 2 168 -- -- - Critical Hdwy 6.68 6.48 4.38 -- - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.68 -- -- - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.68 -- -- - Follow-up Hdwy 3.752 3.552 2.452 -- - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 686 911 1348 -- - Stage 1 881 -- -- - Stage 2 802 -- -- - Platoon blocked, %-- - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 685 911 1348 -- - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 685 -- -- - Stage 1 881 -- -- - Stage 2 800 -- -- - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 10.4 0.1 0 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBTEBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h)1348 - 697 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.002 - 0.046 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 7.7 0 10.4 - - HCM Lane LOS A A B - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.1 - - Queuing and Blocking Report 2016 With Project AM 3/6/2015 Fedex Ground Station SimTraffic Report Rick Engineering Co.Page 1 Intersection: 1: State Hwy 82 & County Rd 154 Movement EB EB NB NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served LT R L TTTTR Maximum Queue (ft) 407 150 46 184 278 291 259 75 Average Queue (ft) 224 14 7 92 63 179 137 17 95th Queue (ft)350 76 29 151 158 306 257 51 Link Distance (ft)985 1202 1202 772 772 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)125 760 675 Storage Blk Time (%) 38 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 4 0 Intersection: 3: County Rd 154 & Driveway Movement EB Directions Served LR Maximum Queue (ft)66 Average Queue (ft)24 95th Queue (ft)62 Link Distance (ft)187 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 4 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 2016 With Project PM 1: State Hwy 82 & County Rd 154 3/6/2015 Fedex Ground Station Synchro 8 Report Rick Engineering Co.Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (veh/h)138 0 14 0 0 0 17 1616 0 0 901 122 Number 3 8 18 7 4 14 1 6 16 5 2 12 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1484 1863 1900 1863 1900 1863 1484 0 0 1484 1484 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 153 0 16 0 0 0 19 1796 0 0 1001 136 Adj No. of Lanes 011010120021 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.92 0.92 0.90 0.90 Percent Heavy Veh, %2222222 2 800 2 8 2 8 Cap, veh/h 172 0 193 0 1 0 26 2218 0 0 2097 938 Arrive On Green 0.12 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.79 0.00 0.00 0.74 0.74 Sat Flow, veh/h 1414 0 1583 0 1863 0 1774 2895 0 0 2895 1262 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 153 0 16 0 0 0 19 1796 0 0 1001 136 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1414 0 1583 0 1863 0 1774 1410 0 0 1410 1262 Q Serve(g_s), s 15.1 0.0 1.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 53.2 0.0 0.0 20.0 4.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 15.1 0.0 1.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 53.2 0.0 0.0 20.0 4.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 172 0 193 0 1 0 26 2218 0 0 2097 938 V/C Ratio(X) 0.89 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.72 0.81 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.14 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 194 0 217 0 59 0 50 2235 0 0 2097 938 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 61.4 0.0 55.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.6 8.9 0.0 0.0 7.2 5.2 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 34.5 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 41.0 3.3 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.3 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(-26165%),veh/ln 7.6 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 21.2 0.0 0.0 8.0 1.6 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 95.9 0.0 55.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 110.6 12.2 0.0 0.0 8.0 5.6 LnGrp LOS F E F B A A Approach Vol, veh/h 169 0 1815 1137 Approach Delay, s/veh 92.0 0.0 13.3 7.7 Approach LOS F B A Timer 12345678 Assigned Phs 1 2468 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 6.1 113.1 0.0 119.2 22.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 7.5 5.5 7.5 5.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.0 104.5 4.5 112.5 19.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.5 22.0 0.0 55.2 17.1 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 82.0 0.0 56.5 0.2 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 15.5 HCM 2010 LOS B Notes User approved pedestrian interval to be less than phase max green. HCM 2010 TWSC 2016 With Project PM 3: County Rd 154 & Driveway 3/6/2015 Fedex Ground Station Synchro 8 Report Rick Engineering Co.Page 3 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.9 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 21 2 2 126 114 28 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 -- -- - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 -- 0 0 - Grade, %0 -- 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 Heavy Vehicles, %28 28 28 28 28 28 Mvmt Flow 23 2 2 140 127 31 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 286 142 158 0 - 0 Stage 1 142 -- -- - Stage 2 144 -- -- - Critical Hdwy 6.68 6.48 4.38 -- - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.68 -- -- - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.68 -- -- - Follow-up Hdwy 3.752 3.552 2.452 -- - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 653 841 1278 -- - Stage 1 825 -- -- - Stage 2 823 -- -- - Platoon blocked, %-- - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 652 841 1278 -- - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 652 -- -- - Stage 1 825 -- -- - Stage 2 821 -- -- - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 10.6 0.1 0 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBTEBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h)1278 - 665 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.002 - 0.038 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 7.8 0 10.6 - - HCM Lane LOS A A B - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.1 - - Queuing and Blocking Report 2016 With Project PM 3/6/2015 Fedex Ground Station SimTraffic Report Rick Engineering Co.Page 1 Intersection: 1: State Hwy 82 & County Rd 154 Movement EB EB NB NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served LT R L TTTTR Maximum Queue (ft) 328 150 70 367 324 220 206 77 Average Queue (ft) 178 10 12 184 142 109 72 22 95th Queue (ft)295 55 43 302 281 189 163 62 Link Distance (ft)985 1202 1202 772 772 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)125 760 675 Storage Blk Time (%) 31 Queuing Penalty (veh) 4 Intersection: 3: County Rd 154 & Driveway Movement EB Directions Served LR Maximum Queue (ft)76 Average Queue (ft)21 95th Queue (ft)60 Link Distance (ft)187 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 4 APPENDIX C Background Traffic ~ a. ..: " s: Cl VI I "' 0 0 N I ~ a. L 8 / +-0 a. / " "' I "' 0 0 N I l!j i L c 8 "'" "" • +- L 0 "" a.- 10 +-L "' a. -/ "" IQ "" > a. -" +-" C L -a §~ CUMULATIVE PROJECTS LOCATIONS ~ 2 ~ ~~ ~ CD = RIVER EDGE COLORADO/CATTLE CREEK s ~ u 0 = BUFF ALO VALLEY APARTMENTS ~ 9 Ol (;\ ~~ ·~ 0 = SKYLARK SCHOOL NOT TO SCALE ~ 5 v ~~ .~ 1--~~~~~~~~~~--r~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.,,,,,,,,,,,....~~~~~~~~~~~~~o ~ EXHIBIT LEGEND = PROJECT SITE ~ ~~ "' BACKGROUND PROJECTS TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION ~= AM/PM ~ ~ 5 ~ ENGINEERING COMPANY FEDERAL EXPRESS GROUND DISTRIBUTION FACILITY XXXX = ADT S ~ ~ g TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS xxxxlxxxx = AM/PM PEAK HR ~ ~ ~ .._~~~~~~~~~~......L~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~=o;=-~~~~~~~~~~~~/0 APPENDIX D Trip Generation Truck Traffic 2 pagesFull Phase 7/7/2014 P&D Van Full Phase Full Phase Arrive Depart Arrive Depart Arrive Depart Arrive Depart Arrive Depart 00:01 - 01:00 1 1 00:01 - 01:00 01:01 - 02:00 1 1 1 1 01:01 - 02:00 02:01 - 03:00 15 15 02:01 - 03:00 03:01 - 04:00 1 1 03:01 - 04:00 04:01 - 05:00 1 1 04:01 - 05:00 05:01 - 06:00 1 1 05:01 - 06:00 06:01 - 07:00 15 2 9 15 11 06:01 - 07:00 07:01 - 08:00 17 14 5 9 2 24 23 07:01 - 08:00 08:01 - 09:00 5 2 5 5 10 7 08:01 - 09:00 09:01 - 10:00 5 5 09:01 - 10:00 10:01 - 11:00 10:01 - 11:00 11:01 - 12:00 2 1 3 11:01 - 12:00 12:01 - 13:00 3 3 12:01 - 13:00 13:01 - 14:00 3 1 1 1 4 13:01 - 14:00 14:01 - 15:00 1 1 14:01 - 15:00 15:01 - 16:00 2 2 15:01 - 16:00 16:01 - 17:00 3 14 9 13 14 16:01 - 17:00 17:01 - 18:00 15 20 9 24 20 17:01 - 18:00 18:01 - 19:00 3 2 3 2 18:01 - 19:00 19:01 - 20:00 1 1 2 19:01 - 20:00 20:01 - 21:00 20:01 - 21:00 21:01 - 22:00 2 2 21:01 - 22:00 22:01 - 23:00 14 14 22:01 - 23:00 23:01 - 24:00 1 1 1 2 1 23:01 - 24:00 Total 82 82 29 29 0 0 4 4 115 115 Total Total Vehicle Flow Full Phase Full Phase Linehaul FedEx Ground Full Phase Expected Traffic Flows Spot Trailers Full Phase Automobile 816 APPENDIX E Turning Templates LEGEND ---FRONT TIRES REAR TIRES ---VEHICLE BODY 30 .00 f ------ / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / r: " 0. ..: " .r::. D "' I "' 0 0 "' I ~ Ii; 0. L 8 / +- 0 0. / u " I "' 0 0 "' I ~ +- f "' +-g c: 0 0 L u 0. ·/ ,... " "' 0 D 0 I 0. :::>" lll.Y. IL 0 0 -;,, 4.00 20 .00 ~ ~ 10 ~ SU feet 40 20 Q 40 80 120 ~ ~ O~ Width , 8.00 ; ~ Track , 8.0D ., ii> U Lock to Lock Time , 6 .OD !?. ~ Cl steering Angle '31.9o GRAPHIC SCALE 111 = 40' ~~ ~ OL lJ LO lJ ~" -~ to-i-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ..... ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--1~§ ~ ~~ ~ EXHIBIT 10 'E~ .!,! 5620 FRIARS ROAD .... L : SANDIEGO,CA92110 SINGLE UNIT TRUCK TURNING TEMPLATE-DRIVEWAY ~~ 0 619.291.0707 N I (0 ENGINEERING COMPANY (FAX)619.291.4165 FEDERAL EXPRESS GROUND DISTRIBUTION FACILITY ~ ~ ---~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~__. .... ,,. LEGEND 2 33 11 00 WB--670 Tractor Width Trailer Width Tractor Track Tr• i ler Track FRONT TIRES REAR TIRES VEHICLE BODY foet B .00 B .50 B .00 B .50 1 00 Lock to Lock Tillll! steer Ing Ang le Articulating Angle RICK 5620 FRIARS ROAD SAN DIEGO, CA 9211 O 619.291.0707 (FAX)619.291.4165 : 6.00 : 15 .60 : 10 OD / / / / / / / / / / / / / / EXHIBIT 11 / / / / / WB-67D TRUCK TURNING TEMPLATE -DRIVEWAY FEDERAL EXPRESS GROUND DISTRIBUTION FACILITY r: " 0. ..: " .r::. D "' I "' 0 0 "' I " u +-"' 0. L 0 (.) / +-0 0. / u " I "' 0 0 "' I " u +- " 0. L 0 0 / " r: +- "'0 u" >-0 ;s: L D 0. I/ DO> ,.._ 0 "' " I 0. "'" ;s:.r. IL -0 -;,, .c / )( "' a>o 10 "'"' 40 20 0 40 80 120 ,.._ I "',., "'" ,..__ -+-/ r: "" 0 .c -/ .c:" 0. u 0 L LO e>u / c 0" GRAPHIC SCALE 111 = 40' -+- ..... " ..... .r. "" L->-L // "'-I c ,.._ L "' +-"' I ,.._ > -L /" -/ >-/ Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. 5020 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Phone: 970-945-7988 Fax: 970-945-8454 Email: hpgeo@hpgeotech.com HEPWORTH -PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY PROPOSED FEDEX GROUND SORT FACILITY COUNTY ROAD 154 NEAR STATE HIGHWAY 82 GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO JOB NO. 115 023A FEBRUARY 27, 2015 PREPARED FOR: KW GLENWOOD SPRINGS, LLC ATTN: KEVIN KIERNAN 941 ORANGE AVENUE, #512 CORONADO, CALIFORNIA 92118 kevin@thekiernancompanies.com Job No. 115 023A TABLE OF CONTENTS PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY ............................................................................ - 1 - PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ..................................................................................... - 1 - SITE CONDITIONS ....................................................................................................... - 2 - SUBSIDENCE POTENTIAL AND GEOLOGIC CONDITIONS ................................. - 2 - FIELD EXPLORATION ................................................................................................. - 3 - SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS ...................................................................................... - 4 - FOUNDATION BEARING CONDITIONS................................................................... - 5 - DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................. - 5 - FOUNDATIONS ......................................................................................................... - 5 - FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS ............................................................ - 7 - FLOOR SLABS .......................................................................................................... - 8 - UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM .......................................................................................... - 8 - SITE GRADING ......................................................................................................... - 9 - PAVEMENT SECTION ............................................................................................. - 9 - SURFACE DRAINAGE ........................................................................................... - 10 - LIMITATIONS ............................................................................................................. - 11 - FIGURE 1 - LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS AND PITS FIGURES 2 AND 3 - LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIGURE 4 - LEGEND AND NOTES-EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIGURE 5 - LOGS OF EXPLORATORY PITS FIGURES 6 AND 7 - SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS FIGURES 8 THROUGH 10 - GRADATION TEST RESULTS FIGURE 11 – USDA GRADATION TEST RESULTS TABLE 1- SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS TABLE 2 – PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS Job No. 115 023A PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY This report presents the results of a geotechnical engineering study for the proposed FedEx Ground Sort Facility to be located at County Road 154 near State Highway 82, Garfield County, Colorado. The project site is shown on Figure 1. The purpose of the study was to develop recommendations for the foundation, grading and pavement designs. The study was conducted in accordance with our proposal for geotechnical engineering services to KW Glenwood Springs, LLC dated January 15, 2015. A field exploration program consisting of exploratory borings and pits was conducted to obtain information on the subsurface conditions. Samples of the subsoils obtained during the field exploration were tested in the laboratory to determine their classification, compressibility or swell and other engineering characteristics. The results of the field exploration and laboratory testing were analyzed to develop recommendations for foundation types, depths and allowable pressures for the proposed building foundation, site grading and pavement sections. This report summarizes the data obtained during this study and presents our conclusions, design recommendations and other geotechnical engineering considerations based on the proposed construction and the subsurface conditions encountered. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION The proposed building will be a single story structure with office and package sorting areas and slab-on-grade floor. The building will be surrounded by drives and parking that will be asphalt paved. The depressed dock will be located at the northeast side of the building and the ramp paved with concrete. Grading for the structure and surrounding paved surfaced areas will typically have shallow cut and fill grading up to about 4 to 5 feet deep. We assume relatively light continuous wall and moderate column foundation loadings, typical of the proposed type of construction. An individual septic disposal system is proposed for onsite sewage disposal. A 20,000 gallon steel water storage tank will be provided at the uphill, east side of the property. The overall layout of the proposed facilities is shown on Figure 1. - 2 - Job No. 115 023A If building loadings, location or grading plans change significantly from those described above, we should be notified to re-evaluate the recommendations contained in this report. SITE CONDITIONS The proposed development is located just southwest of County Road 154 (Old State Highway 82) near the intersection with State Highway 82 and mostly consists of a vacant, irrigated pasture. A gravel ranch road crosses the west end of the property. The ground surface slopes moderately down from CR 154 then flattens to nearly level through the proposed building site then moderately before sloping steeply down to the Roaring Fork River off the property to the south. InterMountain Waste & Recycling is located immediately south (and will be the entrance) of the project site, irrigated field is located to the north and sage covered, non-irrigated land is located to the west. Vegetation consists mostly of grass and weeds on the project site except for the west end where there is sage brush. There was 6 to 8 inches of snow on the site at the time of drilling. SUBSIDENCE POTENTIAL AND GEOLOGIC CONDITIONS Bedrock of the Pennsylvanian age Eagle Valley Formation underlies the project site. These rocks are a sequence of shale, fine-grained sandstone and siltstone and can contain beds or inclusions of gypsum which is in turn underlain by Eagle Valley Evaporite which can contain massive beds of gypsum. There is a possibility that massive gypsum deposits associated with the Eagle Valley Evaporite underlie portions of the property. Dissolution of the gypsum under certain conditions can cause sinkholes to develop and can produce areas of localized subsidence. During previous studies in the area, several sinkholes have been observed scattered throughout the Roaring Fork River valley which appear similar to others associated with the Eagle Valley Evaporite. Sinkholes were not observed in the immediate area of the project site. No evidence of cavities was encountered in the subsurface materials; however, the exploratory borings were relatively shallow, for foundation design only. Based on our present knowledge of the subsurface conditions at the site, it cannot be said for certain that sinkholes will not develop. The risk of future ground subsidence on the project site throughout the service - 3 - Job No. 115 023A life of the proposed facilities, in our opinion, is low; however, the owner should be made aware of the potential for sinkhole development. If further investigation of possible cavities in the bedrock below the site is desired, we should be contacted. Red siltstone of the Maroon Formation is exposed to the northeast across State Highway 82. Grey to tan siltstone of the Eagle Valley Formation underlies the Maroon at roughly the bottom of river, on the order of 60 feet below the project site. The formation rock bedding is generally relatively flat lying below the project site to moderately dipping into the valley side northeast of the project site. At these bedding grades, the formation rock should be relatively stable against slope instability. The formation on the hillside is covered with relatively shallow colluvium with a thicker wedge of slope wash deposit along the toe of the hillside which State Highway 82 alignment roughly follows in the section above the project site. Small ephemeral drainages have developed which cut through the colluvial slope wash deposits and coalesce below State Highway 82 and CR 154 to form relatively fine-grained alluvial fan deposits on top of the river terrace deposits which underlie the project site and extend down to the Roaring Fork River. These river terrace deposits consist of clast supported gravel, cobbles and boulders in a silty sand matrix and in turn are underlain by bedrock of the Eagle Valley Formation. Based on our review, there are no significant geologic hazards that would make the project infeasible and their potential impacts can be mitigated with good engineering and construction practices. FIELD EXPLORATION The field exploration for the project was conducted between January 27 and February 24, 2015. Fourteen exploratory borings were drilled in the building and surrounding area and two profile pits and 4 percolation holes were dug in the proposed septic disposal area at the locations shown on Figure 1 to evaluate the subsurface conditions. The borings were advanced with 4-inch diameter continuous flight augers powered by a CME-45B drill rig and the pits were dug with a rubber-tired backhoe. The borings and pits were logged by a representative of Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. - 4 - Job No. 115 023A Samples of the subsoils were taken with 1⅜ inch and 2 inch I.D. spoon samplers in the boreholes and by disturbed methods in the pits. The samplers were driven into the subsoils at various depths with blows from a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches. This test is similar to the standard penetration test described by ASTM Method D-1586. The penetration resistance values are an indication of the relative density or consistency of the subsoils. Depths at which the samples were taken and the penetration resistance values are shown on the Logs of Exploratory Borings, Figures 2, 3 and 5. The samples were returned to our laboratory for review by the project engineer and testing. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Graphic logs of the subsurface conditions encountered at the site are shown on Figures 2, 3 and 5. The subsoils, below about ½ foot of topsoil, consist of up to about 15 feet of sandy silt and silty clay in the central to eastern part and up to about 6 feet of silty sand with gravel in the western part, overlying dense, silty sandy gravel and cobbles with boulders. Drilling in the dense river gravel soils with auger equipment was difficult due to the cobbles and probable boulders and drilling refusal was encountered in the deposit. Laboratory testing performed on samples obtained from the borings included natural moisture content and density, gradation analyses, liquid and plastic limits and unconfined compressive strength. Results of swell-consolidation testing performed on relatively undisturbed drive samples of the silty clay soils, presented on Figures 6 and 7, indicate low to moderate compressibility under conditions of loading and wetting. Results of gradation analyses performed on small diameter drive samples (minus 1½ inch fraction) of the natural granular soils are shown on Figures 8 through 10. The liquid and plastic limits testing indicate the soils have low or no plasticity and the unconfined compressive strength tests indicate the silt and clay soils generally have medium stiff consistency. The laboratory testing is summarized in Table 1. No free water was encountered in the borings or pits. The granular soils were slightly moist and the silt and clay soils were very moist. The percolation test results are presented in Table 2 and indicate infiltration rates between 30 and 60 minutes per inch for the upper fine-grained soils. The results of a USDA gradation test performed on a sample of the silt taken at the proposed septic disposal area are presented on Figure 11. - 5 - Job No. 115 023A FOUNDATION BEARING CONDITIONS The soils encountered across the project site are variable in type, depth and engineering properties. The silt and clay soils encountered in the middle to northeastern part of the site at shallow depth are compressible under loading but appear suitable for support of lightly loaded spread footings with low bearing capacity. The granular soils encountered near existing ground surface from roughly the middle of the building site and extending to the southwest have relatively low settlement potential with moderate bearing capacity. The silt and clay soils are also a poor subgrade for pavement section support. A coarse grained structural material should be used to improve the bearing capacity below footings and as a subbase layer below the pavement section in silt and clay soil areas. A deep foundation which extends down to the dense river gravel deposit could be used to achieve a low settlement risk foundation. Presented below are recommendations for shallow spread footings. If a deep foundation is considered for building support, we should be contacted for additional analysis and recommendations. DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS FOUNDATIONS Considering the subsurface conditions encountered in the exploratory borings and the nature of the proposed construction, we recommend the building be founded with spread footings bearing on the compacted fill soils or natural granular soils. The design and construction criteria presented below should be observed for a spread footing foundation system. 1) Footings placed on compacted fill soils or the natural granular soils should be designed for an allowable bearing pressure of 2,000 psf. Based on experience, we expect settlement of footings designed and constructed as discussed in this section will be about 1 inch or less and could be differential due to the variable bearing conditions. There could be some additional differential settlement if the bearing soils become wet. - 6 - Job No. 115 023A 2) The footings should have a minimum width of 18 inches for continuous walls and 2 feet for isolated pads. 3) Exterior footings and footings beneath unheated areas should be provided with adequate soil cover above their bearing elevation for frost protection. Placement of foundations at least 36 inches below exterior grade is typically used in this area. 4) Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span local anomalies such as by assuming an unsupported length of at least 12 feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining structures should also be designed to resist lateral earth pressures as discussed in the "Foundation and Retaining Walls" section of this report. 5) The topsoil, silt and clay soil to the prescribed depth and loose or disturbed soils should be removed and the footing bearing level extended down to firm soils. The exposed soils in footing area should then be moisture adjusted to near optimum and compacted. In silt and clay soil areas, the exposed soils should be sub-excavated to provide at least 2 feet of compacted structural fill, such as CDOT Class 2 base course or similar granular material, below footing bearing grade. Compaction should be to at least 98% of standard Proctor density at near optimum moisture content. The structural fill should extend beyond the footing edges a distance of at least ½ the depth of fill below the footing. 6) The proposed water storage tank located between Borings 3 and 4 is expected to be cut into silt and clay soils. The subgrade below the water storage tank should be improved by placing at least 2 feet of structural fill similar to that described above in item 5 before placing base course material for the tank support. 7) Site Class C of IBC 2009, Table 1613.5.2 can be used in the seismic analysis of the structure. 8) A representative of the geotechnical engineer should observe all footing excavations prior to concrete placement to evaluate bearing conditions and test compaction of the structural fill. - 7 - Job No. 115 023A FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS Foundation walls and retaining structures which are laterally supported and can be expected to undergo only a slight amount of deflection should be designed for a lateral earth pressure computed on the basis of an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 55 pcf for backfill consisting of the on-site soils. Cantilevered retaining structures which are separate from the building (such as site walls) and can be expected to deflect sufficiently to mobilize the full active earth pressure condition should be designed for a lateral earth pressure computed on the basis of an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 45 pcf for backfill consisting of the on-site soils. All foundation and retaining structures should be designed for appropriate hydrostatic and surcharge pressures such as adjacent footings, traffic, construction materials and equipment. The pressures recommended above assume drained conditions behind the walls and a horizontal backfill surface. The buildup of water behind a wall or an upward sloping backfill surface will increase the lateral pressure imposed on a foundation wall or retaining structure. An underdrain should be provided to prevent hydrostatic pressure buildup behind walls. Backfill should be placed in uniform lifts and compacted to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Backfill placed in pavement and walkway areas should be compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density. Care should be taken not to overcompact the backfill or use large equipment near the wall, since this could cause excessive lateral pressure on the wall. Some settlement of deep wall backfill should be expected, even if the material is placed correctly, and could result in distress to facilities constructed on the backfill. The lateral resistance of foundation or retaining wall footings will be a combination of the sliding resistance of the footing on the foundation materials and passive earth pressure against the side of the footing. Resistance to sliding at the bottoms of the footings can be calculated based on a coefficient of friction of 0.30 for the silt and clay soils and 0.5 for the coarse granular soils. Passive pressure of compacted backfill against the sides of the footings can be calculated using an equivalent fluid unit weight of 300 pcf. The coefficient of friction and passive pressure values recommended above assume ultimate - 8 - Job No. 115 023A soil strength. Suitable factors of safety should be included in the design to limit the strain which will occur at the ultimate strength, particularly in the case of passive resistance. Fill placed against the sides of the footings to resist lateral loads should be compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. FLOOR SLABS The on-site soils, exclusive of topsoil, appear suitable to support the proposed slab-on- grade construction. There could be some differential settlement due to the variable soil conditions, mainly the silt and clay soils. We recommend at least 2 feet of granular structural fill, similar to that recommended below footings, be placed below floor slabs to help mitigate the settlement risk. To reduce the effects of some differential movement, floor slabs should be separated from all bearing walls and columns with expansion joints which allow unrestrained vertical movement. Floor slab control joints should be used to reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking. The requirements for joint spacing and slab reinforcement should be established by the designer based on experience and the intended slab use. A minimum 4 inch layer of relatively well graded sand and gravel should be placed beneath interior slabs for subgrade support and to break capillary moisture rise. This material should consist of minus 2 inch aggregate with at least 50% retained on the No. 4 sieve and less than 12% passing the No. 200 sieve. All fill materials for support of floor slabs should be compacted to at least 95% of maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Required fill should consist of granular soils devoid of vegetation, topsoil and oversized rock. UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM Although free water was not encountered in the exploratory borings and pits, it has been our experience in the area and with shallow clay soils that local perched groundwater can develop during times of heavy precipitation or seasonal runoff. Frozen ground during spring runoff can also create a perched condition. We recommend below-grade construction, such as retaining walls, be protected from wetting and hydrostatic pressure buildup by an underdrain system. - 9 - Job No. 115 023A The drains should consist of drainpipe placed in the bottom of the wall backfill surrounded above the invert level with free-draining granular material. The drain should be placed at each level of excavation and at least 1 foot below lowest adjacent finish grade and sloped at a minimum 1% to a suitable gravity outlet or drywell based in the underlying coarse granular soils. Free-draining granular material used in the underdrain system should contain less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve, less than 50% passing the No. 4 sieve and have a maximum size of 2 inches. The drain gravel backfill should be at least 1½ feet deep. SITE GRADING The risk of construction-induced slope instability at the site appears low provided the building is located in the flat part of the site as planned and cut and fill depths are limited, such as at the perimeter areas of the project site. We assume cut and fill depths for foundations, walls and pavement areas will not exceed about 5 feet. Embankment fills should be compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density near optimum moisture content. Prior to fill placement, the subgrade should be carefully prepared by removing all vegetation and topsoil and compacting to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density. The fill should be benched into slopes that exceed 20% grade. PAVEMENT SECTION Asphalt surfaced driveway and parking areas are proposed for the project. Concrete pavement will also be used in apron areas against the building and in the depressed truck dock ramp. ESAL traffic loadings for the pavement areas provided to us consist of 143 in parking areas, 92,652 at the entrance drive and 92,509 at the yard areas/entrance drive which include the various truck traffic. The subgrade soils encountered at the site are generally low plasticity sandy silt and clay which are considered a relatively poor support for pavement sections. Structural fill will be needed for the pavement construction in some areas. The imported soils should be a granular material with a minimum Hveem stabilometer ‘R’ value of 30. Based on the traffic loadings provided, the silt and clay subgrade condition and our experience with similar projects, we recommend the - 10 - Job No. 115 023A minimum pavement section for passenger vehicle only areas consist of 3 inches of asphalt over 4 inches of base course on 8 inches of granular subbase. In the entrance drive and yard areas which include heavy truck traffic, 4 inches of asphalt over 6 inches of base course on 12 inches of granular subbase is recommended. The concrete pavement in the aprons next to the building and in the dock ramp should consist of at least 6 inches of Portland cement concrete over 4 inches of road base on 12 inches of granular subbase. The asphalt should be a batched hot mix, approved by the engineer and placed and compacted to the project specifications. The base course and subbase should meet CDOT Class 6 and Class 2 specifications, respectively. All base course, subbase and required subgrade fill should be compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content within 2% of optimum. The section thicknesses assume structural coefficients of 0.14 for aggregate base course, 0.10 for aggregate subbase, 0.44 for asphalt surface and design strength of 4,500 psi for Portland cement concrete. The material properties and compaction should be in accordance with the project specifications. Required fill to establish design subgrade level should consist of imported granular soils. Prior to fill placement the subgrade should be stripped of vegetation and topsoil, scarified to a depth of 8 inches, adjusted to near optimum moisture content and compacted to at least 95% of standard Proctor density. In soft or wet areas a geogrid and/or subexcavation and replacement with aggregate base soils may be needed for stabilization. The subgrade should be proofrolled. Areas that deflect excessively should be corrected before placing pavement materials. The subgrade improvements and placement and compaction of base and asphalt materials should be monitored on a regular basis by a representative of the geotechnical engineer. SURFACE DRAINAGE The following drainage precautions should be observed during construction and maintained at all times after the facilities have been completed: 1) Inundation of the foundation excavations and underslab areas should be avoided during construction. - 11 - Job No. 115 023A 2) Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density in pavement and slab areas and to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density in landscape areas. 3) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions. We recommend a minimum slope of 6 inches in the first 10 feet in unpaved areas and a minimum slope of 2½ inches in the first 10 feet in paved areas. Free-draining wall backfill should be covered with filter fabric and capped with about 2 feet of the on-site fine-grained soils to reduce surface water infiltration. 4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill. 5) Landscaping which requires regular heavy irrigation should be located at least 5 feet from foundation walls. LIMITATIONS This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no warranty either express or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the exploratory borings drilled at the locations indicated on Figure 1, the proposed type of construction and our experience in the area. Our services do not include determining the presence, prevention or possibility of mold or other biological contaminants (MOBC) developing in the future. If the client is concerned about MOBC, then a professional in this special field of practice should be consulted. Our findings include interpolation and extrapolation of the subsurface conditions identified at the exploratory borings and variations in the subsurface conditions may not become evident until excavation is performed. If conditions encountered during construction appear different from those described in this report, we should be notified so that re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made. - 12 - Job No. 115 023A This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes. We are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. As the project evolves, we should provide continued consultation and field services during construction to review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations, and to verify that the recommendations have been appropriately interpreted. Significant design changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommendations presented herein. We recommend on-site observation of excavations and foundation bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a representative of the geotechnical engineer. Respectfully Submitted, HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. Steven L. Pawlak, P.E. Reviewed by: Daniel E. Hardin, P.E. SLP/ksw cc: M. Design Fusion, LLC - Michael Fa (mfa@desgnfusion.biz) High Country Engineering – Roger Neal (rneal@hceng.com) 115 023A ~ HEPWORTH•PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL • PROFILE PIT1. p 1.6. LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS AND PITS Figure 1 BORING 1 BORING2 BORING3 ELEV. = 5949' ELEV. = 5949' ELEV.= 5952' 5955 5955 \ APPROXIMATE PROPOSED DRIVEWAY GRADE ~ 6/12 5950 WC=11.7 5950 DD=103 -200=75 LL=23 Pl=2 WC=5.8 21/12 6/12 Ci5 DD=100 WC=3.4 Ci5 "' -200=52 +4=26 "' LL 5945 5945 LL LL=26 -200=44 c c 0 9/12 Pl=4 13/6,50/2 0 l WC=6.9 l [jJ +4=24 [jJ -200=49 4/12 WC=22.0 5940 DD=94 5940 -200=91 LL=25 Pl=5 UC=700 3/6,17/6 5935 5935 BORING4 BORINGS BORING6 ELEV. = 5953' ELEV.= 5950' ELEV. = 5950.5' 5955 5955 l APPROXIMATE PROPOSED DRIVEWAY GRADE 4/12 WC=134 __L__ 5950 5950 DD=98 -200=75 LL=24 WC=17.3 5/12 4/12 1!'1=2 DD=90 WC=1 .8 -200=91 Ci5 DD=103 Ci5 "' -200=82 LL=27 "' LL 5945 Pl=4 5/12 5945 LL LL=24 c Pl=4 UC=1,150 WC=23.6 c 0 DD=93 0 l 4/12 -200=93 l LL=27 [jJ Pl=5 [jJ UC=1,200 5940 6/12 5940 51/12 5935 79/12 5935 Note: Explanation of symbols is shown on Figure 4. 115 023A c$'&tech LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS Figure 2 DRIVEWAY AND PARKING AREAS HEPWORTH•PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL Ci5 "' LL c 0 l [jJ c 0 l [jJ 5950 5945 5940 5935 5930 5950 5945 5940 5935 115 023A BORING 7 BORINGS ELEV. = 5950.5' ELEV. = 5949.5' 50/4 50/1 40/6,50/1 WC=3.1 +4=42 -200=19 PROPOSED FLOOR ELEV.= 5952' BORING 11 ELEV. = 5949' 8/12 WC=23.9 DD=98 8/12 WC=22.2 DD=100 -200=89 UC=3,100 91/11 WC=2.0 +4=60 -200=10 BORING 12 ELEV.= 5950' 15/6,27/6 31/12 57/12 BORING9 ELEV. = 5949.5' 6/12 WC=20.8 DD=99 7/12 23/12 50/2 BORING 13 ELEV. = 5949' 7/12 7/12 WC=27.8 DD=92 77/12 50/6 Note: Explanation of symbols is shown on Figure 4. BORING 10 ELEV. = 5949.5' 5/12 WC=20.8 DD=100 -200=91 UC=2,500 6/12 WC=28.1 DD=100 47/12 50/5 BORING 14 ELEV. = 5950.5' 22/6,50/1 57/12 WC=2.3 +4=45 -200=22 c$'&tech HEPWORTH•PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS BUILDING AREA 5950 5945 5940 5935 5930 5950 5945 5940 5935 Ci5 "' LL c 0 l [jJ c 0 l [jJ Figure 3 LEGEND: TOPSOIL; organic sandy silt and clay, root zone, brown. CLAY (CL); slightly sandy to sandy, silty, medium stiff to stiff, very moist, red, low to medium plasticity. SILT AND CLAY (ML-CL); slightly sandy to sandy, medium stiff, very moist, red, low plasticity. SAND (SM-SC); very silty, slightly clayey, scattered gravel to gravelly, loose to medium dense, slightly moist, red. GRAVEL AND COBBLES (GM-GP); sillty to slightly silty, sandy, boulders, dense, slightly moist, red-brown, rounded rock. 31/12 T NOTES: Relatively undisturbed drive sample; 2-inch l.D. California liner sample. Drive sample; standard penetration test (SPl), 1 3/8 inch I .D. split spoon sample, ASTM D-1586. Drive sample blow count; indicates that 31 blows of a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches were required to drive the California or SPT sampler 12 inches. Practical drilling refusal. 1. Exploratory borings were drilled on January 27 (Borings 1-6) and February 3 (Borings 7-14), 2015 with 4-inch diameter continuous flight power auger. 2. Locations of exploratory borings were measured approximately by pacing from features shown on the site plan provided. 3. Elevations of exploratory borings were obtained by interpolation between contours shown on the site plan provided. 4. The exploratory boring locations and elevations should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. 5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory boring logs represent the approximate boundaries between material types and transitions may be gradual. 6. No free water was encountered in the borings at the time of drilling. Fluctuation in water level may occur with time. 7. Laboratory Testing Results: WC = Water Content {%) DD = Dry Density {pct) +4 = Percent retained on the No. 4 sieve -200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve LL = Liquid Limit (%) Pl = Plasticity Index {%) UC = Unconfined Compressive Strength (psi) 115 023A c$'&tech HEPWORTH•PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL LEGEND AND NOTES EXPLORATORY BORINGS Figure 4 05 ., LL .c a ., D 0 5 10 LEGEND: PROFILE PIT 1 ELEV.= 5949.5' GRAVEL= 0 ' SAND= 28 -~ SILT= 55 CLAY=17 PROFILE PIT 2 ELEV.= 5949' ' -~ TOPSOIL; organic sandy silt and clay, root zone, brown. SILT AND CLAY (ML-CL); slightly sandy to sandy, medium stiff, very moist, red, low plasticity. 0 5 10 GRAVEL AND COBBLES (GM-GP); sillty to slightly silty, sandy, boulders, dense, slightly moist, red-brown, rounded rock. Disturbed bulk sample. NOTES: 1. Exploratory pits were excavated on February 24, 2015 with a Cat 416B backhoe. 2. Locations of exploratory pits were measured approximately by pacing from features shown on the site plan provided. 3. Elevations of exploratory pits were obtained by interpolation between contours shown on the site plan provided. 4. The exploratory pit locations and elevations should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. 5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory pit logs represent the approximate boundaries between material types and transitions may be gradual. 6. No free water was encountered in the pits at the time of excavating. Fluctuation in water level may occur with time. 7. Laboratory Testing Results: Gravel = Percent retained on No. 10 Sieve Sand = Percent passing No. 10 sieve and retained on No. 325 sieve Silt = Percent passing No. 325 sieve to particle size .002mm Clay = Percent smaller then particle size .002mm 05 ., LL .c a ., D 115 023A c$'&tech LOGS OF EXPLORATORY PITS Figure 5 HEPWORTH•PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL Moisture Content = 20.8 percent Dry Density = 99 pcf Sample of: Sandy Silty Clay From: Boring 9 at 2 ~ Feet 0 --~r- 1 ~ K -Compression * --1-upon c:: -~ 0 2 wetting ·o; "' \ !!! c. E \. 0 3 (.J \ 4 0.1 1.0 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE -ksf 0 r--Moisture Content -28.1 percent -I'--.. Dry Density = 100 pcf 1 ..... r-..~ Sample of: Sandy Silty Clay ~ From: Boring 10 at 5 Feet 2 r-.. \ ---r---. * '-, 3 '-c:: 0 ' ----No movement ·o; ' "' \ 'r--, upon !!! c. 4 wetting E ~ 0 (.J 5 \ 6 \ 7 0.1 1.0 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE -ksf 115 023A c$'&tech SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Figure 6 HEPWORTH•PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL Moisture Content = 23.9 percent 0 Dry Density = 98 pcf ,__ Sample of: Sandy Silty Clay -r-.... From: Boring 11 at 2 ~ Feet 1 ...... 'r- 2 ' "" ( .--Compression upon * 3 wetting c:: \ 0 ·o; "' 4 \. !!! c. ' E 0 \ (.J 5 6 0.1 1.0 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE -ksf Moisture Content = 27.8 percent Dry Density = 92 pcf Sample of: Sandy Silty Clay From: Boring 13 at 5 Feet 0 ---r---.. 1 ...... ,...~ v ./ Compression ./ ,_..upon * 2 If'._ wetting c:: ""' 0 ·o; "' !!! 3 r\. c. E ~ 0 (.J \ 4 \ 5 0.1 1.0 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE -ksf 115 023A c$'&tech SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Figure 7 HEPWORTH•PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL HYDROMETER ANALYSIS SIEVE ANALYSIS I TIME READINGS I U.S. STANDARD SERIES I CLEAR SQUARE OPENINGS I 24H~ 7HR 45 IN. 15 MIN. 60MIN19MIN.4 MIN. 1 MIN. #200 #100 #50 #30 #16 #8 #4 3/B' 3/4' 1 1/2' 3" 5"6" B" 0 100 10 ., 0 20 ., UJ CJ z 30 ro z ~ (ij 40 ., ~ a: f-f-z 50 "' z UJ UJ () () a: 60 "' a: UJ UJ a_ a_ 70 "' 80 ., 90 10 100 0 JXJ1 .(XJ2 JXJ5 .(XJ9 . 019 .!07 .07< .100 .., ... 1.18 2.30 4.75 9.5 12.5 19.0 37.5 7'.2 152 21l3 127 DIAMETER OF PARTICLES IN MILLIMETERS CLAYTOSILT I SAND I GRA1/EL I COBBLES FlNE • MEDIUM I COARSE I FlNE CCARSE GRAVEL 24 % SAND 27 % SILT AND CLAY 49 % LIQUID LIMIT % PLASTICITY INDEX % SAMPLE OF: Very Silty Clayey Gravelly Sand FROM: Boring 1 at 5 Feet HYDROMETER ANALYSIS SIEVE ANALYSIS I ~-7 HR TIME READINGS I U.S. STANDARD SERIES I CLEAR SQUARE OPENINGS I ~~ 15 MIN. 60MIN19MIN.4 MIN. 1 MIN. #200 #100 #50 #30 #16 #8 #4 3/8" 3/4" 1 1/2" 3" 511 611 8" 0 100 10 90 0 20 80 UJ CJ z 30 70 z ~ (ij (/) UJ 40 60 ~ a: f-f-z 50 50 z UJ UJ () () a: 60 40 a: UJ UJ a_ a_ 70 30 80 20 90 10 100 0 .001 .002 .005 .009 .019 .037 .074 .150 .300 .600 1.18 2.36 4.75 9.fii 2.5 19.0 37.5 76.2 12J.52 203 DIAMETER OF PARTICLES IN MILLIMETERS CLAYTOSILT • SAND • GRAVEL • COBBLES I FlNE I MEDIUM I COARSE I FINE I COARSE I GRAVEL 26 % SAND 30 % SILT AND CLAY 44 % LIQUID LIMIT % PLASTICITY INDEX % SAMPLE OF: Very Silty Clayey Gravelly Sand FROM: Boring 2 at 2 Y, Feet 115 023A c$'&tech GRADATION TEST RESULTS Figure 8 HEPWORTH•PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL HYDROMETER ANALYSIS SIEVE ANALYSIS I TIME READINGS I U.S. STANDARD SERIES I CLEAR SQUARE OPENINGS I 24H~ 7HR 45 IN. 15 MIN. 60MIN19MIN.4 MIN. 1 MIN. #200 #100 #50 #30 #16 #8 #4 3/8' 3/4' 1 1/2' 3" 5"6" B" 0 100 10 ., 0 20 ., UJ CJ z 30 ro z ~ (ij 40 ., ~ a: f-f-z 50 "' z UJ UJ () () a: 60 "' a: UJ UJ a_ a_ 70 "' 80 ., 90 10 100 0 JXJ1 .(XJ2 JXJ5 .(XJ9 . 019 .!07 .07< .100 .., ... 1.18 2.30 4.75 9.5 12.5 19.0 37.5 7'.2 152 21l3 127 DIAMETER OF PARTICLES IN MILLIMETERS CLAYTOSILT I SAND I GRA1/EL I COBBLES FlNE • MEDIUM I COARSE I FlNE CCARSE GRAVEL 42 % SAND 39 % SILT AND CLAY 19 % LIQUID LIMIT % PLASTICITY INDEX % SAMPLE OF: Silty Sandy Gravel FROM: Boring 7 at 4 Feet HYDROMETER ANALYSIS SIEVE ANALYSIS I ~-7 HR TIME READINGS I U.S. STANDARD SERIES I CLEAR SQUARE OPENINGS I ~~ 15 MIN. 60MIN19MIN.4 MIN. 1 MIN. #200 #100 #50 #30 #16 #8 #4 3/8" 3/4" 1 1/2" 3" 511 611 8" 0 100 10 90 0 20 80 UJ CJ z 30 70 z ~ (ij (/) UJ 40 60 ~ a: f-f-z 50 50 z UJ UJ () () a: 60 40 a: UJ UJ a_ a_ 70 30 80 20 90 10 100 0 .001 .002 .005 .009 .019 .037 .074 .150 .300 .600 1.18 2.36 4.75 9.fii 2.5 19.0 37.5 76.2 12J.52 203 DIAMETER OF PARTICLES IN MILLIMETERS CLAYTOSILT • SAND • GRAVEL • COBBLES I FlNE I MEDIUM I COARSE I FINE I COARSE I GRAVEL 60 % SAND 30 % SILT AND CLAY 10 % LIQUID LIMIT % PLASTICITY INDEX % SAMPLE OF: SliQhtly Silty Sandy Gravel FROM: Boring 11 at 10 Feet 115 023A c$'&tech GRADATION TEST RESULTS Figure 9 HEPWORTH•PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL D w z :;;: f-w O:'. f-z w u O:'. w Q_ I HYDROMETER ANALYSIS I SIEVE ANALYSIS 8" HR TIME READINGS 24 HR. 7 O 45 MIN.15 MIN. 60MIN19MIN.4 MIN. 1 MIN. #200 U.S. STANDARD SERIES I CLEAR SQUARE OPENINGS #100 #50 #30 #16 #6 #4 3/8' 3/4' 1112'' 3" 5"6" 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 .001 .002 .005 .009 .019 .037 .074 .150 .300 .600 1.18 2.36 4.75 9.5 19.0 37.5 76.2 152 203 12.5 127 DIAMETER OF PARTICLES IN MILLIMETERS ClAYlOSILT SAND 1 GRAVEL FINE I MEDIUM I COARSE I FINE COARSE COBBLES GRAVEL 45 % SAND 33 % SILT AND CLAY 22 % LIQUID LIMIT % PLASTICITY INDEX % SAMPLE OF: Silty Sandy Gravel FROM: Boring 14 at 4 Feet 100 90 80 70 60 (.'.) z Vi Ul « Q_ 50 f-z w u O:'. w 40 Q_ 30 20 10 0 115 023A c$'&tech GRADATION TEST RESULTS Figure 10 HEPWORTH•PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL 0 w z <{ f-w D:'. f-z w u D:'. w [l_ I HYDROMETER ANALYSIS I SIEVE ANALYSIS I I HR TIME READINGS MIN.I 24 HR. 7 1 . O 45 MIN.15 MIN. 60MIN19MIN.4 MIN. #325 #140 U.S. STANDARD SERIES I #60 #35 #18 #10 #4 CLEAR SQUARE OPENINGS 3/8" 3/4" 11/2" 3" 511 611 I 8" 100 10 90 20 80 30 70 40 60 50 50 60 40 70 30 80 20 90 10 100 0 .001 .002 .005 .009 .019 .045 .106 .025 .500 1.00 2.00 4.75 9.5 19.0 37.5 76.2 152 203 DIAMETER OF PARTICLES IN MILLIMETERS SMAIL • V. FINE SAND FINE 1 MEDIUM 1 COARSE IV. CLAY SILT GRAVEL 0 % SAND 28 % SILT 55 % USDA SOIL 1YPE: Silt Loam GRAVEL MEDIUM LARGE ' ' COBBLES CLAY 17 % FROM: Profile Pit 1 at 3 to 4 Feet CJ z (/) (/) <{ [l_ f-z w u D:'. w [l_ 115 023A c$'&tech USDA GRADATION TEST RESULTS Figure 11 HEPWORTH•PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. TABLE 1 Job No. 115 023A SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS Page 1 of 2 SAMPLE LOCATION NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT NATURAL DRY DENSITY GRADATION PERCENT PASSING NO. 200 SIEVE ATTERBERG LIMITS UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH SOIL OR BEDROCK TYPE BORING DEPTH GRAVEL SAND LIQUID LIMIT PLASTIC INDEX (%) (%) (ft) (%) (pcf) (%) (%) (PSF) 1 2½ 5.8 100 52 26 4 Very Sandy Silt and Clay 5 6.9 24 27 49 Very Silty Clayey Gravelly Sand 2 2½ 3.4 26 30 44 Very Silty Clayey Gravelly Sand 3 2½ 11.7 103 75 23 2 Sandy Clayey Silt 10 22.0 94 91 25 5 700 Slightly Sandy Silt and Clay 4 2½ 13.4 98 75 24 2 Sandy Clayey Silt 5 18.8 103 82 24 3 1,700 Sandy Clayey Silt 5 2½ 17.3 90 91 27 4 1,150 Slightly Sandy Silt and Clay 6 5 23.6 93 93 27 5 1,200 Slightly Sandy Silt and Clay 7 4 3.1 42 39 19 Silty Sandy Gravel HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. TABLE 1 Job No. 115 023A SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS Page 2 of 2 SAMPLE LOCATION NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT NATURAL DRY DENSITY GRADATION PERCENT PASSING NO. 200 SIEVE ATTERBERG LIMITS UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH SOIL OR BEDROCK TYPE BORING DEPTH GRAVEL SAND LIQUID LIMIT PLASTIC INDEX (%) (%) (ft) (%) (pcf) (%) (%) (PSF) 9 2½ 20.8 99 Sandy Silty Clay 10 2½ 20.8 100 91 2,500 Slightly Sandy Silty Clay 5 28.1 100 Sandy Silty Clay 11 2½ 23.9 98 Sandy Silty Clay 5 22.2 100 89 3,100 Sandy Silty Clay 10 2.0 60 30 10 Slightly Silty Sandy Gravel 13 5 27.8 92 Sandy Silty Clay 14 4 2.3 45 33 22 Silty Sandy Gravel HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. TABLE 2 PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS JOB NO. 115 023A HOLE NO. HOLE DEPTH (INCHES) LENGTH OF INTERVAL (MIN) WATER DEPTH AT START OF INTERVAL (INCHES) WATER DEPTH AT END OF INTERVAL (INCHES) DROP IN WATER LEVEL (INCHES) AVERAGE PERCOLATION RATE (MIN./INCH) P-1 35 15 6 5 1 Water Added 6¼ 5¾ ½ 5¾ 5¼ ½ Water Added 6½ 6 ½ 6 5½ ½ 5½ 5 ½ 30 P-2 38 15 5 4½ ½ Water Added 5¼ 5 ¼ 5 4½ ½ Water Added 6 5½ ½ 5½ 5 ½ 5 4½ ½ 30 P-3 40 15 7 6½ ½ 6½ 6¼ ¼ 6¼ 5¾ ½ 5¾ 5½ ¼ 5½ 5¼ ¼ 5¼ 5 ¼ 60 P-4 38 15 6 5½ ½ Water Added 6 5¾ ¼ 5¾ 5½ ¼ 5½ 5 ½ 5 4¾ ¼ 4¾ 4½ ¼ 45 Note: Percolation test holes were hand dug in the bottom of backhoe pits and soaked on February 24, 2015. Percolation tests were conducted on February 25, 2015. The average percolation rates were based on the last three readings of each test. DRAINAGE REPORT FOR EASTBANK MINOR SUBDIVISION EASTBANK MAJOR DEVELOPMENT FEDEX BUILDING GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO PREPARED BY: High Country Engineering, Inc. 1517 Blake Avenue, Suite 101 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 (970) 945-8676 March 1, 2015 REVISED June 12, 2015 HCE JOB NUMBER: 2151005.00 ______________________________________________ Roger D. Neal. P.E. Principal Colorado Registered Professional Engineer No. 29975 - 2 - TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE I . I N T R O D U C T I O N 3 I I . S O I L S 3 III. HYDROLOGY 3 I V . O F F - S T E B A S I N S 4 V. EXISTING BASINS 4 VI. PROPOSED BASINS 4 VII. MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION 5 VIII. CONCLUSION 5 EXHIBITS: 1. Vicinity Map (8.5”x11”) 2. SCS Soils Map (8.5”x11”) 3. Existing Drainage Conditions (24”x36”) 4. Proposed Drainage Conditions (24”x36”) 5. NOAA 2 Yr (8.5”x11) 6. NOAA 25 Yr (8.5”x11) 7. NOAA 100 Yr (8.5”x11) Appendices Hydrologic Computations Existing Calculations Proposed Calculations Facility Computations Detention Pond Calculations Drywell Calculations Pipe Calculations Swale Calculations Outlet Weir Calculations - 3 - I. INTRODUCTION The proposed development on Parcel 2A of Eastbank Parcel 2 Lot Split is located across the Roaring Fork River, north of the Ironbridge Golf Course at the south end of the City of Glenwood Springs, Colorado. The site is located along the west side of County Road 154. The proposed development discussed here in this report will be for the construction of a FEDEX building and parking lot. The subject lot is located within a larger parcel that consists of the Intermountain Waste and Recycling LLC (lease) as well as a proposed single family residence. The entire parcel contains approximately 38.20 acres. Each of the three lots will handle their own detention and storm water management. See the enclosed Vicinity Map (Exhibit 1) for site location. II. SOILS Within the project site, there are two soil types as designated by the United States Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service in cooperation with Colorado Agricultural Experiment Station. The soil type that encompasses the majority of the site is designated as soil 8, Atencio-Azeltine complex, 1 to 3 percent slopes. The other soil type is soil 11, Begay Sandy Loam, 6-12 percent slopes, The Soil Conservation Service describes the soils as well drained. Soil 8 is defined as hydrologic group ‘B’ and soil 11 as hydrologic soil group ‘A’. A brief description of the soils has been included on the soils map (Exhibit #2). HP Geotech indicated that the percolation rates for the onsite soils are between 30 and 60 min/inch. III. HYDROLOGY The hydrologic methods for this study are outlined in the Soil Conservation Service (SCS) publication "Procedures for Determining Peak Flows in Colorado" (1980) and the computer program AutoCAD Hydrology TR-55 Tabular Method. Peak on-site flows in this area will be primarily rainfall derived since the site is well below 8,000 feet in elevation. Therefore, the storm drainage system should be more than adequate to handle on-site spring snowmelt runoff. The “range, natural” and “smooth surfaces” Manning’s n numbers were used when determining the time of concentrations for each basin. The “open space, poor” curve number and “asphalt” curve numbers were used to determine composite curve numbers for the existing and offsite basins and the “open space, good” and “asphalt” curve numbers were used to determine the proposed composite curve numbers. Composite runoff coefficients were determined for each basin. Per the NOAA maps, the 2-year, 24 hour storm event produces 1.2 inches per hour, the 25-year, 24 hour storm produces 2.2 inches per hour and the 100-year 24 hour storm event produces 2.6 inches per hour. - 4 - IV. OFF-SITE BASINS One offsite basin drains to the proposed site. The runoff from offsite basin EX-OS1 drains from the northeast to the southwest and onto the site via sheet flow. Offsite basin EX-OS1 consists of the southern portion of US Highway 82, open space, County Road 154, and a paved trail. The runoff from basin EX-OS1 combines with the runoff from basin EX-1 before draining through the site to the historic flow path and eventually to the Roaring Fork River. Refer to sheets EXDR and PRDR in the Exhibits section of this report for the offsite basin delineation and information. Refer to table 1, below for runoff information. V. EXISTING BASINS The existing lot has been broken down into one onsite basin. Basin EX-1 consists of the entire lot and consists of open space. The runoff from the basin flows from the northeast to the southwest and offsite to the Roaring Fork River. Refer to the Hydrologic Computations section in the appendices for basin characteristics and flow information. Refer to Table 1, below for runoff information. Table 1. Existing and Offsite Basin Characteristics BASIN AREA (acre) CN Tc (min) 25-yr Peak Flow (cfs) 100-yr Peak Flow (cfs) EX -1 3.683 79 45.5495 1.3553 1.9668 ES-OS1 1.12 85 10.6115 1.2804 1.7325 VI. PROPOSED DRAINAGE DESIGN The proposed development of the lot calls for the construction of a Fedex facility, a parking lot, a water tank and drainage facilities. The site has been broken down into two proposed onsite basins. Proposed basin PR-1 encompasses the building and the northwest portion of the site. The runoff from basin PR-1 drains from the northeast to the west and to a detention pond and drywell. The runoff from basin PR-1 is captured in a curb that drains to the detention pond and roof drains from the building. Runoff from basin EX-OS1 drains onto the lot along the northern property border. The runoff from basin EX-OS1 will be captured in swale that will be route the runoff to the proposed western detention pond and drywell. Proposed basin PR-2 encompasses the remainder of the area affected by the construction of the proposed facility. The runoff from basin PR-2 is captured in a series of inlets and a curb and gutter system and the runoff is then routed to the southern proposed detention pond and drywell. - 5 - Table 2. Proposed Basin Characteristics BASIN AREA (acre) CN Tc (min) 25-yr Peak Flow (cfs) 100-yr Peak Flow (cfs) PR-1 1.181 89 6.0000 2.2749 2.9332 PR-2 3.784 82 6.0000 4.4313 6.1466 The detention ponds were designed to detain the 25-year and 100- year storm events. The outlet weir from the pond will be sized to pass the offsite flow as well as the allowable onsite release rate. It was determined that the required 25-year detention volume for PR-1 was 2,494.39 cubic feet of storage. The required 100-year detention volume for PR-1 was determined to be 2,338.93 cubic feet. The proposed drywell has an available detention volume of 156.5 cubic feet and the available storage in the detention pond is 6,356 cubic feet. The required 25-year detention storage volume for basin PR-2 was 10,482.26 cubic feet and the basin PR-2 100-year detention storage volume was determined to be 11,415.38 cubic feet. The available detention pond for PR-2 is 13,652 cubic feet. The proposed drywell within the detention pond has an available detention volume of 156.5 cubic feet. If the proposed drywells cannot percolate the runoff into the surrounding soils below the proposed detention ponds, the runoff from the ponds will be discharged in a controlled manner via outlet weirs. The structures will be constructed to control the release rates from the ponds and drywells. The runoff will be routed to the historic overflow paths at the northwestern property and the southwestern property corner via sheet flow to the Roaring Fork River after passing through the outlet weir. The detention pond outlet structures will ultimately release 3.70 cfs during the major storm event. This flow is a combination of the 1.73 cfs flow from basin EX-OS1 and the onsite existing 100 year allowable flow rate (1.97 cfs). The 25 year release rate will be 2.64 cfs. The weir will be 3.25 feet long and 6-inches tall. Calculations for the weir can be seen in the appendices. The conveyance swales will be 12-inches deep with 4:1 side slopes. The minimum grade of the swales shall be 1.2-percent and will have a capacity greater than 20 cfs. VII. MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION The proposed detention pond and drywell will need to be inspected and cleared of debris after large storm events to preserve the retention volume and infiltration capabilities. All inlets will also need to be inspected and cleared of debris after large storm events. All storm water facilities should be inspected and cleaned of debris quarterly as well. VIII. CONCLUSION The design of Eastbank Major Development was created to provide safe routing of offsite and onsite storm water through the proposed lot and to the detention ponds with drywells. The storm water facility design will reduce the offsite impacts from the runoff from the site by over detaining storm water from onsite as well as offsite basins. The amount of - 6 - runoff that will flow downstream off the site will be reduced, thus reducing negative impacts on downstream land owners and storm water facilities. The large detention ponds will also allow for storm water runoff cleansing, which will reduce pollutant transport downstream. EXHIBITS . . I ,. •. 302330 302330 Soil Map-Rifle Area, Colorado, Parts of Garfield and Mesa counties (Eastbank Minor Subdivision) 302390 302450 302510 302570 302630 sow:; CHARACTERISTICS SOIL 8, ATENCIO-AZELTINE COMPLEX, 1 TO 3 PERCENT SLOPES. THE SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE DESCRIBES THE son. AS WEIJ. DRAINED. THE son. IS DEFINED AS HYDROLOGIC GROUP 'B'. SOIL 11, Begay Sandy Loam, 6 TO 12 PERCENT SLOPES. THE SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE DESCRIBES THE SOIL AS WEIJ. DRAINED. THE SOIL IS DEFINED AS HYDROLOGIC GROUP 'A'. DRAWNBv: GARFIELD COUNTY, CO ALG CHECKED BY: EAS'l1:1ANK MINOR SUB. RDN SOILS MAP DATE: 3'1-15 302690 302750 SCALE: 1" .. 200' o: 2151005.00 PAGE: 2 • HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC. 1 .. 1NV£RN:;:-~118::;~,.F;.~~coao112 11117 B~A.~,llTI: IGl.GLJ!!NWOOD 8PllJNGS, C08111111 PHONll:'970llMl5e878 PAX(IJ70)-www.-coo< FILE: .J:/SDSKPROJ/215/1005/DWG/SOILS.awG (') z II ~ @<ID N -u .. ::c UI 0 .. L. 0 rn 0 0 UI -i . z 8 () I I I I I I I • I I I • I .... I .... !ll I I !ll I I I • • I I I I I . I EASTBANK, LLC GARFIELD COUNTY, CO. EASTBANK MAJOR DEVELOPMENT EXISTING DRAINAGE BASIN MAP ~ I I I I / ( / I I I / / 0 a ... ~~ !j " !Z! ~i ~ ? !! I I I / I I I I / I ) I _// ''\ I I; \ \-~ ! ( / / I I I c;:i ::0 > 'ti :::i:: ,__, (') Ul (') > t"" t:<j \ \ "" I 1-~ ! ) It / _! / / I ;--- / ,,,-/ I I I I .....--.....-- -- I I \ -- I I \ -- I I I I / I J / / // DRAWN BY: HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC. 1=:===-=-LL?---------1 ,__No-+-. _o_ATE---+-___ R_Evi_sio_N ----+~sv-'-------1 c'61;1.Jffi~ii.ttirc2~~N CHECKED BY. 1517BLAKEAVENUE,STE 101, 1·800·922·1987 RON GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 8160 I DATE: OR 534 · 06700 IN METRO DENVER PHONE (970) 9458676 " FAX (970) 94&2555 3. 1·2015 CALL 2·BU5INESS DAYS IN ADVANCE BEFORE YOU DIG. GRADE. OR WWW HCENG Co FILE: EXCAVATEFORTHEMARKINGOF • • M EXOR UNDERGROUND MEMBER UTILITIES /\----- \ ----- > \ / @@ , / / / I Q/ / I I OINMET CALL 2-BUSIN RO DENVER EJflEFORE yf,f,S DAYS IN AD UNr3itil't;R5 FOR !j'-lfE t,RADE, 'b~CE UNO MEMBmKlNG OF UTILITIES I NOAA ATLAS 2, Volume Ill Prepared by U.S . Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Adminis1ration National Weather Se-rvice., Office of Hydrology Prepared for U.S . Department of Agr iculture, Soll Conservation Service., Engineering Division Figure 26 ISOPLUVIALS OF 2-YR 24-HR PRECIPITATION IN TENTHS OF AN INCH • HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING. INC. rRFIELD COUNTY. co Ali; 1" = 40.ooo· CHECKED BY: ROJECT O: i 4 1NVERN=~~~=.t;..~~~·coeoiia BANK MAJOR SUB RDN 2151005.00 IBl7BIJJ<E:AVE:NUE:,STJ;: 101,GL»rNOODBPRINQll,COBl&OI NOAA MAP 2YR DATE: PAGE: PHONB(970)1MlH187e FAXl970JMIHtllllll EXHIBIT ft 3-2·15 5 WWW,HCl:NG.coM FIL.E:: J./SDSXPRO.J/215/ 1005/DWG/NOAA-2YR.DWG DRAWN BY" SCALE: Prepared by U.S. Department of Commen:e National Ocean ic and Atmospheric Admin istration National Weather Service, Office of Hydrology Prepared for U.S. Department of Agriculture, So il Conservation Service, Eng ineering Divis ion Figure29 ISOPLUVIALS OF 25-YR 24-HR PRECIPITATION IN TENTHS OF AN INCH DRAWN BY: SCALE: t,, = 40,000' • HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING. INC. rRFIELD COUNTY. co CHECKE~: RO.JECT o: 141NVERN=~~~=.t;..~~~·coeo11a BANK MAJOR SUB RDN 2151005.00 DATE" PAGE' IBl7BIJJ<E:AVE:NUE:.rrli: 101,GL»rNOODBPRINQll,COBl&OI NOAAMAP,215YR . ;a.. 2 .15 . 6 PHONB(970)=:::.:.~l970JMHllllll EXHIBl'JW8 1-F-IL.E:-:-------------; J./SDSXPRO.J/215/ 1005/DWG/NOAA-25YR.DWG Prepared by U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Weather Service, Office of Hydrology Prepared for U.S. Oepartm&nt of Agriculture, Soil Conservatiof'I Service, Eng ineering Division Figure31 ISOPLUVIALS OF 100-YR 24-HR PRECIPITATIO I IN TENTHS OF AN INCH 111 =40,0001 • HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC. GARFIELD COUNTY, co CHECKE~: RO.JECT o: 141NYERN=~~~=.t;..~~~·C0801 la EASTBANK MINOR SUB.1-----=R-=D:..:..:N'---------...,------'2_1_5_1 o_o_5._oo_--t DATE" PAGE: IBl7BIJJ<E:AVE:NUE:,STJ;:IOl,GL»rNOODBPRINQll,C081801 NOAAMAP, IOOYR . 3-1·15 7 PHONB(970)1MlH187e FAXl970JMIHtllllll EXHIBIT "7 1--___::....:....:-=-------------t WWW,HCl:NG.coM FIL.E:: J:/SDSXPRO.J/215/ 1005/DWG/NOAA-1 OOYR.DWG DRAWN BY: SCALE: HYDROLOGIC COMPUTATIONS • EXISTING CONDITIONS file:///J|/SDSKPROJ/215/1005/hd/EX-OS1,%2025%20YR.txt[3/9/2015 9:21:29 PM] FEDEX MAJOR SUBDIVISION 2151005.00 EX-OS1, 25 YR TR-55 Tabular Hydrograph Method Input Summary Description ..................... EX-OS1, 25 YR Rainfall Distribution ........... Type II Ia/P Interpolation .............. On Total Area ...................... 1.1200 ac Peak Time ....................... 732.0000 min Peak Flow ....................... 1.2804 cfs Given Input Data: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Subarea D/S Subareas Area CN Tc Tt Rainfall Description (ac) (min) (min) (in) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- EX-OS1 1.1200 85 10.6115 0.0000 2.2000 Support Data: Subarea Name: EX-OS1, Row: 1 Sheet Flow ---------- Description ..................... Manning's n ..................... 0.1300 Flow Length ..................... 280.5195 ft Two Yr, 24 hr Rainfall .......... 1.2000 in Land Slope ...................... 0.3300 ft/ft Computed Sheet flow time .......................> 10.6115 min Messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 12.0000 min in row <1>. *************************** Total Time of Concentration .........................> 10.6115 min **************************** Composite Runoff Curve Number Calculator Description Area (ac) Curve Number ------------ ----------- -------------- IMPERVIOUS 0.3600 98 PERVIOUS 0.7600 79 Total Area -----> 1.1200 85 <----- Weighted CN Messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 12.0000 min in row <1>. file:///J|/SDSKPROJ/215/1005/hd/EX-OS1,%20100%20YR.txt[3/9/2015 9:21:29 PM] FEDEX MAJOR SUBDIVISION 2151005.00 EX-OS1, 100 YR TR-55 Tabular Hydrograph Method Input Summary Description ..................... EX-OS1, 100 YR Rainfall Distribution ........... Type II Ia/P Interpolation .............. On Total Area ...................... 1.1200 ac Peak Time ....................... 732.0000 min Peak Flow ....................... 1.7325 cfs Given Input Data: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Subarea D/S Subareas Area CN Tc Tt Rainfall Description (ac) (min) (min) (in) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- EX-OS1 1.1200 85 10.6115 0.0000 2.6000 Support Data: Subarea Name: EX-OS1, Row: 1 Sheet Flow ---------- Description ..................... Manning's n ..................... 0.1300 Flow Length ..................... 280.5195 ft Two Yr, 24 hr Rainfall .......... 1.2000 in Land Slope ...................... 0.3300 ft/ft Computed Sheet flow time .......................> 10.6115 min Messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 12.0000 min in row <1>. *************************** Total Time of Concentration .........................> 10.6115 min **************************** Composite Runoff Curve Number Calculator Description Area (ac) Curve Number ------------ ----------- -------------- IMPERVIOUS 0.3600 98 PERVIOUS 0.7600 79 Total Area -----> 1.1200 85 <----- Weighted CN Messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 12.0000 min in row <1>. file:///J|/SDSKPROJ/215/1005/hd/EX-1,%2025%20YR.txt[3/9/2015 9:21:29 PM] FEDEX MAJOR SUBDIVISION 2151005.00 EX-1, 25 YR TR-55 Tabular Hydrograph Method Input Summary Description ..................... EX-1, 25 YR Rainfall Distribution ........... Type II Ia/P Interpolation .............. On Total Area ...................... 3.6830 ac Peak Time ....................... 762.0000 min Peak Flow ....................... 1.3553 cfs Given Input Data: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Subarea D/S Subareas Area CN Tc Tt Rainfall Description (ac) (min) (min) (in) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- EX-1 3.6830 79 45.5495 0.0000 2.2000 Support Data: Subarea Name: EX-1, Row: 1 Sheet Flow ---------- Description ..................... Manning's n ..................... 0.1300 Flow Length ..................... 300.0000 ft Two Yr, 24 hr Rainfall .......... 1.2000 in Land Slope ...................... 0.0113 ft/ft Computed Sheet flow time .......................> 43.1796 min Messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 45.0000 min in row <1>. Shallow Concentrated Flow ------------------------- Description ..................... Surface ......................... Unpaved Flow Length ..................... 251.3200 ft Watercourse Slope ............... 0.0120 ft/ft Velocity ........................ 1.7674 fps Computed Shallow flow time .....................> 2.3699 min Messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 45.0000 min in row <1>. *************************** Total Time of Concentration .........................> 45.5495 min **************************** file:///J|/SDSKPROJ/215/1005/hd/EX-1,%2025%20YR.txt[3/9/2015 9:21:29 PM] Composite Runoff Curve Number Calculator Description Area (ac) Curve Number ------------ ----------- -------------- IMPERVIOUS 0.0000 98 PERVIOUS 3.6830 79 Total Area -----> 3.6830 79 <----- Weighted CN Messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 45.0000 min in row <1>. file:///J|/SDSKPROJ/215/1005/hd/EX-1,%20100%20YR.txt[3/9/2015 9:21:29 PM] FEDEX MAJOR SUBDIVISION 2151005.00 EX-1, 100 YR TR-55 Tabular Hydrograph Method Input Summary Description ..................... EX-1, 100 YR Rainfall Distribution ........... Type II Ia/P Interpolation .............. On Total Area ...................... 3.6830 ac Peak Time ....................... 762.0000 min Peak Flow ....................... 1.9668 cfs Given Input Data: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Subarea D/S Subareas Area CN Tc Tt Rainfall Description (ac) (min) (min) (in) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- EX-1 3.6830 79 45.5495 0.0000 2.6000 Support Data: Subarea Name: EX-1, Row: 1 Sheet Flow ---------- Description ..................... Manning's n ..................... 0.1300 Flow Length ..................... 300.0000 ft Two Yr, 24 hr Rainfall .......... 1.2000 in Land Slope ...................... 0.0113 ft/ft Computed Sheet flow time .......................> 43.1796 min Messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 45.0000 min in row <1>. Shallow Concentrated Flow ------------------------- Description ..................... Surface ......................... Unpaved Flow Length ..................... 251.3200 ft Watercourse Slope ............... 0.0120 ft/ft Velocity ........................ 1.7674 fps Computed Shallow flow time .....................> 2.3699 min Messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 45.0000 min in row <1>. *************************** Total Time of Concentration .........................> 45.5495 min **************************** file:///J|/SDSKPROJ/215/1005/hd/EX-1,%20100%20YR.txt[3/9/2015 9:21:29 PM] Composite Runoff Curve Number Calculator Description Area (ac) Curve Number ------------ ----------- -------------- IMPERVIOUS 0.0000 98 PERVIOUS 3.6830 79 Total Area -----> 3.6830 79 <----- Weighted CN Messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 45.0000 min in row <1>. • PROPOSED CONDITIONS file:///J|/SDSKPROJ/215/1005/hd/PR-1,%2025%20YR.txt[6/13/2015 9:17:17 PM] FEDEX MAJOR SUBDIVISION 2151005.00 6-11-15 PR-1, 25 YR TR-55 Tabular Hydrograph Method Input Summary Description ..................... PR-1, 25 YR Rainfall Distribution ........... Type II Ia/P Interpolation .............. On Total Area ...................... 1.1810 ac Peak Time ....................... 726.0000 min Peak Flow ....................... 2.2749 cfs Given Input Data: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Subarea D/S Subareas Area CN Tc Tt Rainfall Description (ac) (min) (min) (in) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PR-1 1.1810 89 6.0000 0.0000 2.2000 Support Data: Subarea Name: PR-1, Row: 1 Sheet Flow ---------- Description ..................... Manning's n ..................... 0.0110 Flow Length ..................... 300.0000 ft Two Yr, 24 hr Rainfall .......... 1.2000 in Land Slope ...................... 0.0242 ft/ft Computed Sheet flow time .......................> 4.4151 min Messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 6.0000 min in row <1>. Shallow Concentrated Flow ------------------------- Description ..................... Surface ......................... Paved Flow Length ..................... 97.9600 ft Watercourse Slope ............... 0.0100 ft/ft Velocity ........................ 2.0328 fps Computed Shallow flow time .....................> 0.8032 min Messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 6.0000 min in row <1>. *************************** Total Time of Concentration .........................> 5.2183 min **************************** file:///J|/SDSKPROJ/215/1005/hd/PR-1,%2025%20YR.txt[6/13/2015 9:17:17 PM] Composite Runoff Curve Number Calculator Description Area (ac) Curve Number ------------ ----------- -------------- IMPERVIOUS 0.8310 98 PERVIOUS 0.3500 69 Total Area -----> 1.1810 89 <----- Weighted CN Messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 6.0000 min in row <1>. file:///J|/SDSKPROJ/215/1005/hd/PR-1,%20100%20YR.txt[6/13/2015 9:17:15 PM] FEDEX MAJOR SUBDIVISION 2151005.00 6-11-15 PR-1, 100 YR TR-55 Tabular Hydrograph Method Input Summary Description ..................... PR-1, 100 YR Rainfall Distribution ........... Type II Ia/P Interpolation .............. On Total Area ...................... 1.1810 ac Peak Time ....................... 726.0000 min Peak Flow ....................... 2.9332 cfs Given Input Data: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Subarea D/S Subareas Area CN Tc Tt Rainfall Description (ac) (min) (min) (in) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PR-1 1.1810 89 6.0000 0.0000 2.6000 Support Data: Subarea Name: PR-1, Row: 1 Sheet Flow ---------- Description ..................... Manning's n ..................... 0.0110 Flow Length ..................... 300.0000 ft Two Yr, 24 hr Rainfall .......... 1.2000 in Land Slope ...................... 0.0242 ft/ft Computed Sheet flow time .......................> 4.4151 min Messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 6.0000 min in row <1>. Shallow Concentrated Flow ------------------------- Description ..................... Surface ......................... Paved Flow Length ..................... 97.9600 ft Watercourse Slope ............... 0.0100 ft/ft Velocity ........................ 2.0328 fps Computed Shallow flow time .....................> 0.8032 min Messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 6.0000 min in row <1>. *************************** Total Time of Concentration .........................> 5.2183 min **************************** file:///J|/SDSKPROJ/215/1005/hd/PR-1,%20100%20YR.txt[6/13/2015 9:17:15 PM] Composite Runoff Curve Number Calculator Description Area (ac) Curve Number ------------ ----------- -------------- IMPERVIOUS 0.8310 98 PERVIOUS 0.3500 69 Total Area -----> 1.1810 89 <----- Weighted CN Messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 6.0000 min in row <1>. file:///J|/SDSKPROJ/215/1005/hd/PR-2,%2025%20YR.txt[6/13/2015 9:17:15 PM] FEDEX MAJOR SUBDIVISION 2151005.00 6-11-15 PR-2, 25 YR TR-55 Tabular Hydrograph Method Input Summary Description ..................... PR-2, 25 YR Rainfall Distribution ........... Type II Ia/P Interpolation .............. On Total Area ...................... 3.7840 ac Peak Time ....................... 726.0000 min Peak Flow ....................... 4.4313 cfs Given Input Data: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Subarea D/S Subareas Area CN Tc Tt Rainfall Description (ac) (min) (min) (in) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PR-2 3.7840 82 6.0000 0.0000 2.2000 Support Data: Subarea Name: PR-2, Row: 1 Sheet Flow ---------- Description ..................... Manning's n ..................... 0.0110 Flow Length ..................... 300.0000 ft Two Yr, 24 hr Rainfall .......... 1.2000 in Land Slope ...................... 0.0182 ft/ft Computed Sheet flow time .......................> 4.9481 min Messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 6.0000 min in row <1>. Shallow Concentrated Flow ------------------------- Description ..................... Surface ......................... Paved Flow Length ..................... 97.9600 ft Watercourse Slope ............... 0.0100 ft/ft Velocity ........................ 2.0328 fps Computed Shallow flow time .....................> 0.8032 min Messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 6.0000 min in row <1>. *************************** Total Time of Concentration .........................> 5.7513 min **************************** file:///J|/SDSKPROJ/215/1005/hd/PR-2,%2025%20YR.txt[6/13/2015 9:17:15 PM] Composite Runoff Curve Number Calculator Description Area (ac) Curve Number ------------ ----------- -------------- IMPERVIOUS 1.6630 98 PERVIOUS 2.1210 69 Total Area -----> 3.7840 82 <----- Weighted CN Messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 6.0000 min in row <1>. file:///J|/SDSKPROJ/215/1005/hd/PR-2,%20100%20YR.txt[6/13/2015 9:17:15 PM] FEDEX MAJOR SUBDIVISION 2151005.00 6-11-15 PR-2, 100 YR TR-55 Tabular Hydrograph Method Input Summary Description ..................... PR-2, 100 YR Rainfall Distribution ........... Type II Ia/P Interpolation .............. On Total Area ...................... 3.7840 ac Peak Time ....................... 726.0000 min Peak Flow ....................... 6.1466 cfs Given Input Data: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Subarea D/S Subareas Area CN Tc Tt Rainfall Description (ac) (min) (min) (in) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PR-2 3.7840 82 6.0000 0.0000 2.6000 Support Data: Subarea Name: PR-2, Row: 1 Sheet Flow ---------- Description ..................... Manning's n ..................... 0.0110 Flow Length ..................... 300.0000 ft Two Yr, 24 hr Rainfall .......... 1.2000 in Land Slope ...................... 0.0182 ft/ft Computed Sheet flow time .......................> 4.9481 min Messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 6.0000 min in row <1>. Shallow Concentrated Flow ------------------------- Description ..................... Surface ......................... Paved Flow Length ..................... 97.9600 ft Watercourse Slope ............... 0.0100 ft/ft Velocity ........................ 2.0328 fps Computed Shallow flow time .....................> 0.8032 min Messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 6.0000 min in row <1>. *************************** Total Time of Concentration .........................> 5.7513 min **************************** file:///J|/SDSKPROJ/215/1005/hd/PR-2,%20100%20YR.txt[6/13/2015 9:17:15 PM] Composite Runoff Curve Number Calculator Description Area (ac) Curve Number ------------ ----------- -------------- IMPERVIOUS 1.6630 98 PERVIOUS 2.1210 69 Total Area -----> 3.7840 82 <----- Weighted CN Messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 6.0000 min in row <1>. FACILITY COMPUTATIONS file:///J|/SDSKPROJ/215/1005/hd/PR-1,%2025%20YR%20POND.txt[6/13/2015 9:17:18 PM] FEDEX MAJOR SUBDIVISION 2151005.00 6-11-15 PR-1, 25 YR POND Basin Output Pond Name ....................... Distribution Type ............... Type II Frequency Type .................. 25 years Area ............................ 1.1810 ac Peak Inflow ..................... 2.2749 cfs Peak Outflow .................... 0.6776 cfs Runoff .......................... 1.5300 in Runoff Volume ................... 6558.7457 ft3 Storage Volume .................. 2494.3940 ft3 Maximum Storage Elevation ....... 0.0000 ft file:///J|/SDSKPROJ/215/1005/hd/PR-1,%20100%20YR%20POND.txt[6/13/2015 9:17:15 PM] FEDEX MAJOR SUBDIVISION 2151005.00 6-11-15 PR-1, 100 YR POND Basin Output Pond Name ....................... Distribution Type ............... Type II Frequency Type .................. 100 years Area ............................ 1.1810 ac Peak Inflow ..................... 2.9332 cfs Peak Outflow .................... 0.9834 cfs Runoff .......................... 1.5300 in Runoff Volume ................... 6558.7457 ft3 Storage Volume .................. 2338.9322 ft3 Maximum Storage Elevation ....... 0.0000 ft file:///J|/SDSKPROJ/215/1005/hd/PR-2,%2025%20YR%20POND.txt[6/13/2015 9:17:15 PM] FEDEX MAJOR SUBDIVISION 2151005.00 6-11-15 PR-2, 25 YR POND Basin Output Pond Name ....................... Distribution Type ............... Type II Frequency Type .................. 25 years Area ............................ 3.7840 ac Peak Inflow ..................... 4.4313 cfs Peak Outflow .................... 0.6776 cfs Runoff .......................... 1.5300 in Runoff Volume ................... 21014.6434 ft3 Storage Volume .................. 10482.2637 ft3 Maximum Storage Elevation ....... 0.0000 ft file:///J|/SDSKPROJ/215/1005/hd/PR-2,%20100%20YR%20POND.txt[6/13/2015 9:17:17 PM] FEDEX MAJOR SUBDIVISION 2151005.00 6-11-15 PR-2, 100 YR POND Basin Output Pond Name ....................... Distribution Type ............... Type II Frequency Type .................. 100 years Area ............................ 3.7840 ac Peak Inflow ..................... 6.1466 cfs Peak Outflow .................... 0.9834 cfs Runoff .......................... 1.5300 in Runoff Volume ................... 21014.6434 ft3 Storage Volume .................. 10337.0952 ft3 Maximum Storage Elevation ....... 0.0000 ft file:///J|/SDSKPROJ/215/1005/hd/100%20YR%20WEIR.txt[3/9/2015 9:21:28 PM] EASTBANK MAJOR DEVELOPMENT 2151005.00 100 YR OUTLET WEIR Weir Calculator Given Input Data: Weir Type ....................... Rectangular Equation ........................ Suppressed Solving for ..................... Depth of Flow Flowrate ........................ 3.6993 cfs Coefficient ..................... 0.6500 Height .......................... 0.5000 ft Computed Results: Depth of Flow ................... 0.4751 ft Full Flow ....................... 3.9942 cfs Velocity ........................ 2.3959 fps Width ........................... 3.2500 ft Area ............................ 1.6250 ft2 Perimeter ....................... 4.2500 ft Wet Perimeter ................... 4.2002 ft Wet Area ........................ 1.5440 ft2 Percent Full .................... 95.0155 % file:///J|/SDSKPROJ/215/1005/hd/25%20YR%20WEIR.txt[3/9/2015 9:21:30 PM] EASTBANK MAJOR DEVELOPMENT 2151005.00 25 YR OUTLET WEIR Weir Calculator Given Input Data: Weir Type ....................... Rectangular Equation ........................ Suppressed Solving for ..................... Depth of Flow Flowrate ........................ 2.6357 cfs Coefficient ..................... 0.6500 Height .......................... 0.5000 ft Computed Results: Depth of Flow ................... 0.3790 ft Full Flow ....................... 3.9942 cfs Velocity ........................ 2.1399 fps Width ........................... 3.2500 ft Area ............................ 1.6250 ft2 Perimeter ....................... 4.2500 ft Wet Perimeter ................... 4.0080 ft Wet Area ........................ 1.2317 ft2 Percent Full .................... 75.7958 % Volume to Width of Depth of gravel Dia of Percent Detain (cf)Gravel (ft) Below M.H. (ft)M.H.Voids (%) 0 1.5 1 4 30 Area of M.H. (sqft)12.6 Area of Gravel (sqft)25.9 Depth Volume of Vol of Gravel Vol of Drywell Vol of Drywell Vol of Total Volume Varied Gravel Voids Conic Section Cyl. Section Drywell Volume Met (ft) (cf) (cf) (cf) (cf) (cf) (cf) 3 77.8 23.3 31.4 0.0 31.4 54.7 Meets Min. 4 103.7 31.1 31.4 12.6 44.0 75.1 Meets Min. 5 129.6 38.9 31.4 25.1 56.5 95.4 Meets Min. 6 155.5 46.7 31.4 37.7 69.1 115.8 Meets Min. 7 181.4 54.4 31.4 50.3 81.7 136.1 Meets Min. 8 207.3 62.2 31.4 62.8 94.2 156.5 Meets Min. 9 233.3 70.0 31.4 75.4 106.8 176.8 Meets Min. 10 259.2 77.8 31.4 88.0 119.4 197.1 Meets Min. 11 285.1 85.5 31.4 100.5 131.9 217.5 Meets Min. 12 311.0 93.3 31.4 113.1 144.5 237.8 Meets Min. 13 336.9 101.1 31.4 125.7 157.1 258.2 Meets Min. 14 362.9 108.9 31.4 138.2 169.6 278.5 Meets Min. Tele: (970) 945-8676 - Fax (970) 945-2555 Variables Drywell Calculations 1517 Blake Avenue, Suite 101 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Calculation of Drywell and Gravel for Each Drywell (1 Drywell) HCE# 2151005.00 J:/sdskproj/215/1005/excel/dry well.xls FEDEX MAJOR DEVELOPMENT DRYWELL DRAINAGE CALCULATION March 2, 2015 file:///J|/SDSKPROJ/215/1005/hd/PIPE%20CAPACITY.txt[6/13/2015 9:28:18 PM] FEDEX 2151005.00 6-12-15 18" PIPE CAPACITY Manning Pipe Calculator Given Input Data: Shape ........................... Circular Solving for ..................... Flowrate Diameter ........................ 1.5000 ft Depth ........................... 1.4000 ft Slope ........................... 0.0150 ft/ft Manning's n ..................... 0.0130 Computed Results: Flowrate ........................ 13.8367 cfs Area ............................ 1.7671 ft2 Wetted Area ..................... 1.7166 ft2 Wetted Perimeter ................ 3.9289 ft Perimeter ....................... 4.7124 ft Velocity ........................ 8.0608 fps Hydraulic Radius ................ 0.4369 ft Percent Full .................... 93.3333 % Full flow Flowrate .............. 12.8651 cfs Full flow velocity .............. 7.2802 fps file:///J|/SDSKPROJ/215/1005/hd/EX-OS1%20100%20YR%20PIPE%20FLOW.txt[3/9/2015 9:21:29 PM] FEDEX MAJOR SUBDIVISION 2151005.00 EX-OS1, 100 YR Manning Pipe Calculator Given Input Data: Shape ........................... Circular Solving for ..................... Depth of Flow Diameter ........................ 12.0000 in Flowrate ........................ 1.7325 cfs Slope ........................... 0.0410 ft/ft Manning's n ..................... 0.0130 Computed Results: Depth ........................... 4.0037 in Area ............................ 0.7854 ft2 Wetted Area ..................... 0.2295 ft2 Wetted Perimeter ................ 14.7794 in Perimeter ....................... 37.6991 in Velocity ........................ 7.5502 fps Hydraulic Radius ................ 2.2357 in Percent Full .................... 33.3642 % Full flow Flowrate .............. 7.2141 cfs Full flow velocity .............. 9.1853 fps Critical Information Critical depth .................. 6.7173 in Critical slope .................. 0.0065 ft/ft Critical velocity ............... 3.8290 fps Critical area ................... 0.4525 ft2 Critical perimeter .............. 20.2841 in Critical hydraulic radius ....... 3.2122 in Critical top width .............. 12.0000 in Specific energy ................. 1.2195 ft Minimum energy .................. 0.8397 ft Froude number ................... 2.6984 Flow condition .................. Supercritical file:///J|/SDSKPROJ/215/1005/hd/WEST%20CONVEYANCE%20SWALE.txt[3/9/2015 9:21:30 PM] FEDEX MAJOR DEVELOPMENT 2151005.00 WESTERN CONVEYANCE SWALE Channel Calculator Given Input Data: Shape ........................... Trapezoidal Solving for ..................... Flowrate Slope ........................... 0.0060 ft/ft Manning's n ..................... 0.0200 Depth ........................... 1.0000 ft Height .......................... 1.0000 ft Bottom width .................... 0.0000 ft Left slope ...................... 0.2500 ft/ft (V/H) Right slope ..................... 0.2500 ft/ft (V/H) Computed Results: Flowrate ........................ 14.2122 cfs Velocity ........................ 3.5531 fps Full Flowrate ................... 14.2122 cfs Flow area ....................... 4.0000 ft2 Flow perimeter .................. 8.2462 ft Hydraulic radius ................ 0.4851 ft Top width ....................... 8.0000 ft Area ............................ 4.0000 ft2 Perimeter ....................... 8.2462 ft Percent full .................... 100.0000 % Critical Information Critical depth .................. 0.0000 ft Critical slope .................. 0.0000 ft/ft Critical velocity ............... 0.0000 fps Critical area ................... 0.0000 ft2 Critical perimeter .............. 0.0000 ft Critical hydraulic radius ....... 0.0000 ft Critical top width .............. 0.0000 ft Specific energy ................. 0.0000 ft Minimum energy .................. 0.0000 ft Froude number ................... 0.0000 Flow condition .................. Critical file:///J|/SDSKPROJ/215/1005/hd/CROSS%20PAN%20CAPACITY.txt[3/9/2015 9:21:28 PM] EASTBANK MAJOR DEVELOPMENT 2151005.00 CROSS PAN CAPACITY Channel Calculator Given Input Data: Shape ........................... Trapezoidal Solving for ..................... Flowrate Slope ........................... 0.0233 ft/ft Manning's n ..................... 0.0130 Depth ........................... 0.0833 ft Height .......................... 0.0833 ft Bottom width .................... 0.0000 ft Left slope ...................... 0.0833 ft/ft (V/H) Right slope ..................... 0.0833 ft/ft (V/H) Computed Results: Flowrate ........................ 0.1742 cfs Velocity ........................ 2.0917 fps Full Flowrate ................... 0.1742 cfs Flow area ....................... 0.0833 ft2 Flow perimeter .................. 2.0069 ft Hydraulic radius ................ 0.0415 ft Top width ....................... 2.0000 ft Area ............................ 0.0833 ft2 Perimeter ....................... 2.0069 ft Percent full .................... 100.0000 % Critical Information Critical depth .................. 0.0000 ft Critical slope .................. 0.0000 ft/ft Critical velocity ............... 0.0000 fps Critical area ................... 0.0000 ft2 Critical perimeter .............. 0.0000 ft Critical hydraulic radius ....... 0.0000 ft Critical top width .............. 0.0000 ft Specific energy ................. 0.0000 ft Minimum energy .................. 0.0000 ft Froude number ................... 0.0000 Flow condition .................. Critical 3130 Verona Avenue • Buford, GA 30518 (866) 888-8479 / (770) 932-2443 • Fax: (770) 932-2490 © Nyloplast Inlet Capacity Charts June 2012 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50 0.55 0.60 0.65 0.70 0.75 0.80 0.85 0.90 0.95 1.00 1.05 1.10 Ca p a c i t y ( c f s ) Head (ft) Nyloplast 24" Standard Grate Inlet Capacity Chart 3130 Verona Avenue • Buford, GA 30518 (866) 888-8479 / (770) 932-2443 • Fax: (770) 932-2490 © Nyloplast Inlet Capacity Charts June 2012 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50 0.55 0.60 0.65 0.70 0.75 0.80 0.85 0.90 0.95 1.00 1.05 1.10 Ca p a c i t y ( c f s ) Head (ft) Nyloplast 18" Drop In Grate Inlet Capacity Chart Ecological Assessment of Eastbank Property for Minor Subdivision and Major Impact Review Garfield County, Colorado February 18, 2015 Report for: Kevin Kiernan ℅ Davis Farrar Western Slope Consulting, LLC 0165 Basalt Mt Dr. Carbondale, CO 81623 Report By: Colorado Wildlife Science, LLC Jonathan Lowsky, MS 0100 Elk Run Drive, Suite 128 Basalt, CO 81621 Page left intentionally blank. Wildlife & Ecological Assessment - Eastbank FedEx February 18, 2015 COLORADO WILDLIFE SCIENCE, LLC | iii Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION..........................................................................................................................................1 2.0 METHODS ..................................................................................................................................................1 3.0 SITE DESCRIPTION & VEGETATION ............................................................................................................1 4.0 LAND SUITABILITY ANALYSIS: Natural Habitat & Migration Routes §4-502(D) ........................................2 4.1 THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES ....................................................................................................2 4.2 OTHER SPECIES OF INTEREST .....................................................................................................................5 5.0 IMPACT ANALYSIS §4-502(E) ....................................................................................................................8 5.1 THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES ....................................................................................................8 6.0 PROTECTION OF WILDLIFE HABITAT AREAS §7-202 .................................................................................9 7.0 LITERATURE CITED ...................................................................................................................................11 8.0 BACKGROUND & QUALIFICATIONS ..........................................................................................................13 MAPS .............................................................................................................................................................14 PHOTOS .........................................................................................................................................................18 APPENDIX A: CPW SAM mule deer and elk seasonal activity area definitions .............................................25 APPENDIX B: State of Colorado Threatened & Endangered Vertebrates .....................................................26 APPENDIX C: U.S. Fish & Wildlife Consultation Letter ..................................................................................28 Maps Map 1. Aerial view & vegetation ................................................................................................................. 15 Map 2. CPW mapped bald eagle & black bear seasonal habitats ................................................................ 16 Map 3. CPW mapped mule deer & elk field verified seasonal habitats ....................................................... 17 Photos Photo 1. Property is comprised of a series of terraces or benches .............................................................. 19 Photo 2. Dirt access road .............................................................................................................................. 19 Photo 3. Lower dirt access road to Parcel 2B ............................................................................................... 20 Photo 4. Higher quality sagebrush shrubland .............................................................................................. 20 Photo 5. Poor quality, disturbed sagebrush shrubland with no understory vegetation .............................. 21 Photo 6. Due to disturbance, rabbitbrush approaches co-dominance in remnant sagebrush stands ......... 21 Photo 7. Scotch thistle is a problem on the property ................................................................................... 22 Photo 8. Elk pellets were common on the February site assessment .......................................................... 22 Photo 9. Elk tracks were observed during the site visit ................................................................................ 23 Photo 10. The property is highly disturbed with large areas of bare soil and weeds .................................. 23 Photo 11. Non-native, invasive species and bare ground dominate large portions of the property ........... 24 Photo 12. Russian olive stand on the northwest end of the property ......................................................... 24 Page left intentionally blank. Wildlife & Ecological Assessment - Eastbank FedEx February 18, 2015 COLORADO WILDLIFE SCIENCE, LLC | 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION This report presents an evaluation of the wildlife, wildlife habitat, and ecological resources of a parcel of land known as Parcel 2A of the Eastbank Parcel 2 Lot Split (Parcel ID # 2185- 353-04-001) in unincorporated Garfield County and assesses the effects of the proposed minor subdivision and development on those resources. This analysis addresses significant wildlife use of the property, evaluates potential effects of development on wildlife, plants, and other important ecological resources, and recommends actions to reduce ecological impacts. This report specifically addresses potential impacts to wildlife, plants and plant communities per the Garfield County Land Use Code (LUC) – specifically, Land Suitability Analysis, Impact Analysis, and Section 7-202 Protection of Wildlife Habitat Areas. The applicant is proposing to subdivide the property for development of a commercial building, parking lots, and associated infrastructure. 2.0 METHODS This assessment is based on: (1) a February 11, 2015 site assessment; (2) a review of current Colorado Parks & Wildlife (CPW) Species Activity Mapping (SAM) (Colorado Division of Parks & Wildlife 2014); and (3) the author’s experience in recognizing, avoiding, minimizing, and mitigating potential impacts of development on wildlife and other ecological resources in Garfield County and western Colorado. 3.0 SITE DESCRIPTION & VEGETATION The property is situated in the North-Central Highlands and Rocky Mountain Section of the Southern Rocky Mountains Steppe - Open Woodland - Coniferous Forest - Alpine Meadow Physiographic Province (Bailey 1976, Omernik 1987, Bailey 1995, Bailey et al. 1998). Elevation of the property is approximately 5,940 feet above mean sea level and lies within the southwest quarter of Section 35 of Township 6 South, Range 89 of the 6th Principal Meridian. The property is dominated by a series of relatively flat terraces situated at a prominent bend in the Roaring Fork River (Figure 1) approximately 5 miles south-southwest of downtown Glenwood Springs, CO on the site of an old gravel pit . Each terrace is separated by a small, relatively steep slope that is characteristic of such river terraces in the Roaring Fork watershed (Photo 1). A dirt driveway (Photo 2) passes through the property providing access from Old Highway 82 to Parcel 2B of the Eastbank Parcel 2 Lot Split. The upper terrace (on the east side of the property) is dominated by a flood irrigated hay field on the north with commercial development and the remnants of the old gravel operation. Another dirt driveway passes through this portion of the property paralleling the river to the west of the developed area. This driveway also leads to Parcel 2B of the Lot Split (Photo 3). Outside of the hayfield and the developed areas, the vegetation is disturbed and quite sparse with large areas of bare soil. The slopes between the terraces are the most intact and the native plant communities that persist on those sites are likely remnants of the vegetation that once dominated the property – Big Sagebrush Shrubland (Photo 4). This Wildlife & Ecological Assessment - Eastbank FedEx February 18, 2015 COLORADO WILDLIFE SCIENCE, LLC | LAND SUITABILITY ANALYSIS: Natural Habitat & Migration Routes §4-502(D) 2 association occurs on moderate slopes between 4,500-6,900 feet. Big sagebrush is the dominant shrub with antelope bitterbrush, mountain-mahogany, and rabbitbrush occurring as well. Grasses such as needleandthread, Idaho fescue, bluebunch wheatgrass, and prairie junegrass are expected to occur within the sagebrush shrubland at this elevation but understory plants on the property are largely absent (Photo 5). Given the degree of disturbance on the site, the seral stage varies from patches of late successional versions of the big sagebrush plant community with nearly pure stands of sagebrush to larger areas where rabbitbrush is co-dominant or dominant (Photo 6). Although a thorough weed assessment has not been conducted, it is clear that there are serious weed infestations on the property. Again, this is largely due to past land uses on the property. Scotch thistle (Onopordum acanthium; Photo 7), cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum), houndstongue (Cynoglossum officinale) are among the more common Garfield County listed Noxious Weeds observed on the property. Numerous other non-natives and invasive species occur. 4.0 LAND SUITABILITY ANALYSIS: Natural Habitat & Migration Routes §4-502(D) 4.1 Threatened and Endangered Species1 Species protected under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) that may occur in Garfield County are listed below in Table 1. Also included are species listed as Endangered or Threatened by the State of Colorado that occur in Garfield County. Some of the species listed below are typically found within habitats that do not occur on the property or within areas that cannot be affected by actions associated with the project. There will be no effect on these off-site species. A brief rationale for the “no effect” determination for each of these species is included in the following paragraphs. Table 1. Threatened or Endangered Species that may occur in Garfield County, Colorado or may be affected by the project. Common Name Latin Name Occurrence Status‡ Potential Habitat on the property? Surveys Conducted? Habitat Effect BIRDS Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus In Colorado, statewide along rivers, lakes, reservoirs. All of the conterminous United States and Alaska. Two-thirds of breeding sites west of Continental Divide. Concentrations include the Yampa. White, and Colorado Rivers (Kingery 1998). ST Yes No Open water bodies, prairie dog colonies important food source during the winter. Breeding: Usually nests in tall trees or on cliffs near water. Winter: Preferentially roosts in conifers or other sheltered sites in winter in some areas; typically selects the larger, more accessible trees. Perching in deciduous and coniferous trees is equally common in other areas (NatureServe 2005). No Effect Burrowing Owl Athene cunicularia British Columbia east to Saskatchewan south through most of western US, Mexico, Central America, and South America. Found primarily in eastern Colorado as a summer resident but also on west slope, primarily in Mesa County, but also Delta, Garfield, Montrose, and Montezuma (Kingery 1998). ST No No Nest primarily in near prairie dog and other ground squirrel burrows. Prefer sparsely vegetated habitat particularly shortgrass prairie in eastern Colorado and semi-desert shrubland on the west slope (Kingery 1998). No Effect Mexican Spotted Owl Strix occidentalis lucida Southern Utah and Colorado, through Arizona, New Mexico, and west Texas, to the mountains of central Mexico (Rinkevich et al. 1995). FT, ST No No Complex forest or rocky canyons that contain uneven-aged, multi-level and old- aged, thick forests. below 9,500 feet elevation. Nests in standing snags and No Effect 1 See Appendix B for the list of Colorado Threatened and Endangered species Wildlife & Ecological Assessment - Eastbank FedEx February 18, 2015 COLORADO WILDLIFE SCIENCE, LLC | LAND SUITABILITY ANALYSIS: Natural Habitat & Migration Routes §4-502(D) 3 Table 1. Threatened or Endangered Species that may occur in Garfield County, Colorado or may be affected by the project. Common Name Latin Name Occurrence Status‡ Potential Habitat on the property? Surveys Conducted? Habitat Effect hollow trees (Rinkevich et al. 1995) Western Yellow-Billed Cuckoo Coccyzus americanus In Colorado west of the Continental Divide, the species was probably never common (Bailey and Niedrach 1965, Kingery 1998) and is now extremely rare (Kingery 1998). One confirmed nesting observation occurred along the Yampa River near Hayden during the Breeding Bird Atlas surveys conducted from 1987- 1994 (Kingery 1998) and one cuckoo, representing a probable nesting pair in surveyed lowland river riparian habitat along six rivers in west-central Colorado (Dexter 1998). FT, SC No No Nest in deciduous woodlands associated with wetlands or streams. Require combination of dense willow understory for nesting, a cottonwood overstory for foraging, and large patches of habitat (Laymon 1980, Gaines and Laymon 1984, Kingery 1998). Feed on grasshoppers, caterpillars, beetles and other insects (Dillinger 1989). No Effect MAMMALS Canada lynx Lynx canadensis Colorado is the southern limit of the North American distribution of the species, and the population is considered isolated from those in the Northern Rockies (McKelvey et al. 2000). FT, SE No No Engelmann spruce/subalpine fir is the habitat used by lynx with a mix of spruce, fir and aspen second. Riparian and riparian-mix areas used heavily too. Lynx in Colorado increasingly using riparian areas beginning in July, peaking in November, and dropping off December through June (Shenk 2009). No Effect North American river otter Lontra canadensis 2003 CDOW statewide river otter survey found 3 viable populations: Gunnison, Piedra, and Green river populations. In addition, evidence of otters was on the Cache la Poudre, South Platte, Michigan, and Illinois rivers and also reported additional individual sightings. River otters are found occasionally in the Roaring Fork and Crystal River. ST Yes No Water bodies and riparian areas within a broad range of ecosystems from semi- desert shrubland to montane and subalpine forest. The primary habitat requirement for river otters is permanent water with abundant fish or crustacean prey and relatively high water quality (Boyle 2006). No Effect PLANTS Ute ladies'-tresses Spiranthes diluvialis Eastern slope of Rocky Mountains in southeastern Wyoming & Nebraska, north central and central Colorado; in the upper Colorado River Basin, particularly the Uinta Basin; and in the Bonneville Basin along the Wasatch Front and westward in the eastern Great Basin, in north-central and western Utah, extreme eastern Nevada and southeastern Idaho. Nearest location is near Catherine, CO. FT No No Subirrigated, alluvial soils along streams, and in open meadows, in floodplains. 4500 to 6800 ft. No Effect ‡Status: T = Threatened ; E = Endangered; P = Proposed; FC = Candidate for federal listing; SC = State species of concern Of the 6 state and federal listed, candidate, and proposed species potentially occurring or potentially affected by actions on the property only bald eagles have habitat within proximity of the project area. 4.1.1 Bald Eagle (ST) Background Bald eagles were listed as endangered under the ESA in 1978 but had recovered sufficiently by 1995 to be downlisted to threatened status. This species is also state-listed as threatened. Because of its successful recovery, there is a current proposal to delist bald eagles from the ESA, but protections would remain under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA), and the Bald Eagle Protection Act. Bald eagles are listed as Threatened by the state of Colorado (Colorado Division of Parks & Wildlife 2015a). According to CPW data, in 2014 there were 120 known nesting pairs in Colorado, and approximately 400-1,000 bald Wildlife & Ecological Assessment - Eastbank FedEx February 18, 2015 COLORADO WILDLIFE SCIENCE, LLC | LAND SUITABILITY ANALYSIS: Natural Habitat & Migration Routes §4-502(D) 4 eagles winter in the state (Colorado Division of Parks & Wildlife 2015b). Bald eagles depend on large roost trees that allow them a wide field of vision for prey. Food sources include fish, small mammals, waterfowl, and carrion. Known sensitive habitats in the project area include winter range, winter foraging habitat (Figure 2A). No known bald eagle nests occur in or adjacent to the project area. Effects of Proposed Action The closest active nest is at Aspen Glen, approximately 4 miles to the south-southeast. There are no active roost sites on or adjacent to the property. The property lies within bald eagle winter range and adjacent to bald eagle winter forage habitat (Colorado Division of Parks & Wildlife 2014). Winter forage and winter range, however, are broadly defined habitat areas that occupy very large areas (Colorado Division of Parks & Wildlife 2014). Winter Forage: Foraging areas frequented by wintering bald eagles between November 15 and March 15. May be a large area radiating from preferred roosting sites. In western Colorado preferred roosting sites are within dominant riparian zones. Winter Range: Those areas where bald eagles have been observed between November 15 and April 1. 4.1.2 Canada Lynx (FT/SE, G5/S1) The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service published a final rule on March 24, 2000 listing the Canada lynx (Lynx canadensis) in the coterminous United States as a "threatened" species under the Endangered Species Act (Federal Register: 65 FR 16052). In 1999 and 2000, the State of Colorado began releases of lynx in southwestern Colorado in order to reestablish a viable lynx population within the state. The property is not situated within proximity to potential lynx habitat and no lynx have been documented on or within close proximity to the property (J. Mao, CPW, pers. comm.). Lynx denning habitat is comprised of spruce-fir forests, north-facing lodgepole pine forests, and Douglas-fir forests with complex multi-storied conifer stands, large quantities of downed woody debris and or dense understory conifer that provide den sites in close proximity to habitat for foraging on snowshoe hares. Winter foraging habitat is all denning habitat plus conifer stands that lack structure for dens sites but provide optimal winter foraging conditions of dense (35% or more) horizontal conifer cover at or above the snow (USDA Forest Service 2002). On November 9, 2006, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service released a proposed critical habitat plan for lynx (Federal Register: 50 CFR Part 17 66008) which omits Colorado, New Mexico, and southern Wyoming (United States Fish & Wildlife Service 2006). The habitat types on and adjacent to the proposed activity envelope are not suitable lynx winter foraging or denning habitat and should be considered “unsuitable private lands” (USDA Forest Service 2002, Shenk and Kahn 2010, USFWS and USFS 2010, Theobald and Shenk 2011). 4.1.3 Ute Ladies'-tresses Orchid (FT, G2G3) The Ute ladies’-tresses orchid (Spiranthes diluvialis) was listed as threatened under the ESA in January 1992, and is ranked as imperiled both globally (G2G3) and in the state of Wildlife & Ecological Assessment - Eastbank FedEx February 18, 2015 COLORADO WILDLIFE SCIENCE, LLC | LAND SUITABILITY ANALYSIS: Natural Habitat & Migration Routes §4-502(D) 5 Colorado (S2) (NatureServe 2015). This orchid is a perennial that grows up to 20 inches tall and has a distinctive spike of white flowers (USFWS 2010). It is known from British Columbia southwards to Colorado. Utah has the largest number of element occurrences, followed by Colorado (NatureServe 2012). In Colorado, it is known from Boulder, El Paso, Garfield, Jefferson, Larimer, Moffat, and Weld Counties (NatureServe 2015). The closest known occurrence, however, is along the Roaring Fork River at Catherine near Carbondale which is approximately 9.5 mi to southeast of the property (Durkin 2009). The Ute ladies’-tresses orchid generally blooms from late July through the end of August (USFWS 2010b). Depending on location and climatic conditions, however, the blooming timeframe can vary considerably (USFWS 1992). It is adapted to early- to mid-seral site s with moist to wet conditions, where competition for light, space, water, and other resources is normally kept low by periodic or recent disturbance events (NatureServe 2015). In Colorado, the orchid is found along perennial streams or rivers, or in groundwater-fed spring or sub-irrigated meadows at elevations ranging from 4,560 feet to 6,260 feet (Fertig et al. 2005). The habitat types on and adjacent to the proposed activity envelope are not suitable. The property is entirely upland habitat, and the correct hydrology is not present to qualify the site as potential Ute ladies’-tresses orchid habitat. 4.2 Other Species of Interest This section addresses present use of the study area by significant wildlife not listed by the state or federal government. The ‘significant’ wildlife use described herein refers to those wildlife species that are of ecological, economic, regulatory, social, and/or political importance. 4.2.1 Ungulates Rocky Mountain Elk & Mule Deer Mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus hemionus) are present on the property throughout the year but elk (Cervus elaphus nelsoni) only occur in winter. CPW mapping correctly maps the property solely as mule deer winter range (Colorado Division of Parks & Wildlife 2014). Limiting Factors Limiting factors are influences that determine whether a wildlife population increases, decreases or remains stable. It is important to understand that there is seldom one factor that, by itself, causes a reduction or an increase in the population of a given species. It is usually the interaction of several factors that determine the fate of a population. For example, predation may seem to be a factor causing an elk population to decline when in fact restricted winter habitat, deep snow or the lack of alternate prey may be what allows predation to have a major impact. Traditionally, we have looked at the concept of food, water, cover and space as the primary components that determine how suitable a habitat is for wildlife. While this is true, it oversimplifies our understanding of how various factors affect habitat. Several other factors may not be as important on their own, but when they are combined with the four primary habitat components, the value of the habitat may be Wildlife & Ecological Assessment - Eastbank FedEx February 18, 2015 COLORADO WILDLIFE SCIENCE, LLC | LAND SUITABILITY ANALYSIS: Natural Habitat & Migration Routes §4-502(D) 6 immediately enhanced or reduced. For example, other land uses can greatly impact elk use of suitable range. In the Roaring Fork Watershed the limiting factors for bighorn sheep, elk, and mule deer most affected by residential development are winter habitats, production areas, and migration habitat. Winter Range, Severe Winter Range, Winter Concentration Both elk and mule deer on winter range continuously seek the most moderate ambient weather conditions, and other factors influencing habitat selection are secondary. In winter, elk move between foraging and bedding sites in response to changing ambient temperatures, increasing snow depths, and to enhance control of body temperature. On the coldest days and/or when snow depths are greatest, both species seek southerly and westerly facing slopes where snows typically melt quickly. Snow depths greater than 12 inches begin to reduce the winter range (USFWS 1982). In general, mule deer and elk do not tolerate snow depths greater than chest height and are impeded when snow is knee- deep (Loveless 1967, Kelsall and Prescott 1971, Parker 1984, Toweill et al. 2002, Ungulate Winter Range Technical Advisory Team 2005). Consequently, winter range of larger elk covers a greater areal extent of lands with greater snow depths than that of mule deer (Parker 1984). As stated above, the property is not used by elk in winter. Both deer and elk (Photo 8) pellets and tracks (Photo 9) were observed throughout the property. The property provides marginal winter range, suitable only in relatively light winters. In an average to heavy winter, these areas do not provide good winter range due to the accumulation of snow. CPW mapped winter range lies to the east across SH-82 and the west across the Roaring Fork River (Figures 2A, 2B). The higher quality winter range, however, lies across further east on the slopes and lower reaches of Spring Valley and further west on the slopes west of Prehm Road and Westbank Road where deep snows do not accumulate. Current CPW Species Activity Mapping (SAM) data does not delineate the property within or adjacent to deer or elk severe winter or winter concentration habitat. These habitat types for mule deer occur on the slopes west of Prehm Road and Westbank Road and across SH-82. Production Areas Elk calving grounds or production areas are carefully selected by cows and are generally in locations where cover, forage, and water are in close proximity (Seidel 1977a, Phillips and Alldredge 2000, Barbknecht et al. 2011, Rearden et al. 2011). Calving sites occur in the lower to middle portions of summer range and often occur in the same general area each year. Although selected sites are used for a brief period in the spring or early summer, elk production habitat often a limiting factor for a given population. Sites must provide security from harassment and be within or adjacent to high quality summer range. Elk are considered a hider species because the calf remains bedded at a location and responds to threats by remaining prone while the female moves away to forage, returning periodically to nurse. Seidel (1977b, 1977a) studied elk calving habitat at various sites in the White River National Forest. He found that cow elk prepare a distinct birthing bed and, for the most part, return to that bed each year. All birthing beds examined were in mature aspens Wildlife & Ecological Assessment - Eastbank FedEx February 18, 2015 COLORADO WILDLIFE SCIENCE, LLC | LAND SUITABILITY ANALYSIS: Natural Habitat & Migration Routes §4-502(D) 7 with a thick understory of shrubs such as chokecherry and snowberry. All beds were located on southeast-facing slopes within 183 m (200 yd) of a water source. Personal observation by CWS of calving behavior in the Roaring Fork watershed has largely confirmed Seidel’s assessment with the following additions: (1) the aspect variable described by Seidel seems to be less important than the understory variable. Active elk calving habitat in the Roaring Fork watershed is known to occur on variable aspects, but there is always significant woody understory vegetation which provides calves with hiding cover; (2) very young spotted calves and probable birthing beds have been observed in narrowleaf cottonwood riparian habitat that has a dense willow, alder, and/or chokecherry understory; and (3) although some elk cows do indeed exhibit strong calving site fidelity, others do not. Recent research supports Seidel’s conclusions (See Phillips and Alldredge 2000, Barbknecht et al. 2011, Rearden et al. 2011). There is no mapped or field verified elk production habitat on or within proximity to the property. The nearest known production habitat is more than 4 miles to the southwest. Migration Corridors There are no mapped or field verified migration corridors on or near the property. Rocky Mountain Bighorn Sheep There is no mapped (Colorado Division of Parks & Wildlife 2014) or field verified bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis) habitat on or immediately adjacent to the study area. 4.2.2 Other Species Black Bears Black bears (Ursus americanus) use the river corridor west of the property for daily and seasonal movement. Although CPW maps the property (Figure 2B) within a black bear fall concentration area (Colorado Division of Parks & Wildlife 2014), this is likely a mapping error due to scale since the property supports little bear forage with very few chokecherry, Gambel oak, serviceberry or other fruit or mast bearing shrubs. Raptors CWS conducted a raptor nest search during the site assessment. No raptor nests were found. No breeding or nesting activity was observed. No peregrine falcon activity areas, nests, or potential nesting areas are located in the vicinity of the Ranch (Colorado Division of Parks & Wildlife 2014). Greater Sage-Grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) No greater sage-grouse are known or suspected to occur on or within proximity to the property. No historic leks occur on or near the property (Colorado Division of Parks & Wildlife 2014). Wildlife & Ecological Assessment - Eastbank FedEx February 18, 2015 COLORADO WILDLIFE SCIENCE, LLC | IMPACT ANALYSIS §4-502(E) 8 5.0 IMPACT ANALYSIS §4-502(E) The physical removal of vegetation or other habitat features is known as direct habitat loss. Disturbance resulting from human activity associated the proposed development will decrease the effectiveness of habitat that remains physically undisturbed. This is known as indirect habitat loss. As with most development in western Colorado, the implementation of the proposed project will have some direct and indirect effects on wildlife and wildlife habitat. The property, however, is embedded in a highly developed landscape. It is currently occupied by mixed agricultural and commercial operations. Neighboring properties are a mix of commercial and residential development. Although the proposal will result in the direct loss of vegetation and habitat, given the surroundings and indirect impacts of the existing development and the disturbed nature of the vegetation, this loss will be negligible. 5.1 Threatened and Endangered Species As discussed above, there are no ESA listed or Candidate species known to occur on the property. As such, it is highly unlikely that the proposed development will have any effect on federal Threatened, Endangered, or Candidate vertebrate species (See Table 1, above). 5.1.1 Bald Eagle The portion of the property proposed for development occupies a tiny fraction of the CPW mapped bald eagle winter forage area and winter range. The winter forage area and winter range in which the Ranch is situated are 187,470 acres and 4,669,528 acres, respectively. As such, it is unlikely that the proposed development will have significant impacts on these habitat areas. Given that there are no active or historic nest sites or roosts within close proximity to the property and the area occupies negligible portions of the winter range and winter foraging areas, the project will have no effect on bald eagle habitat. 5.1.2 Canada Lynx Bald Eagle There is no suitable Canada lynx habitat on or within proximity to the property. As such, the project will have no effect on Canada lynx. 5.1.3 Ute ladies'-tresses Orchid There is no suitable Ute ladies'-tresses orchid habitat on or adjacent to the property. As such, the project will have no effect on Ute ladies'-tresses orchids. 5.2 Other Species of Interest 5.2.1 Ungulates Given the analysis above (4.2.1) the proposed development may affect, but not likely to adversely affect mule deer and elk. There will be no effect on bighorn sheep. Wildlife & Ecological Assessment - Eastbank FedEx February 18, 2015 COLORADO WILDLIFE SCIENCE, LLC | PROTECTION OF WILDLIFE HABITAT AREAS §7-202 9 5.2.2 Black Bears The proposed development will not result in the direct or indirect loss of black bear foraging habitat or fall concentration habitat. Consequently, there will be no effect on black bears. 5.2.3 Raptors The proposed development will not result in the loss of any known raptor nests, nest stands, or any unique habitat attributes. Loss of undeveloped land will reduce hunting acreage for some generalist species such as American kestrels, great-horned owls (Bubo virginianus) and red-tailed hawks. The proposal may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect raptors. 5.2.4 Greater Sage-Grouse Greater sage-grouse do not occur on or within proximity to the property nor do they have the potential to occur. Consequently, there will be no effect on greater sage-grouse. 5.3 Alteration of Existing Native Vegetation The proposed development will result in the loss of negligible acreage of native vegetation. The highest quality native shrublands occur on the slopes on the west side of the property. The applicant does not propose any development in that area. The balance of vegetation is comprised of highly disturbed patches of native vegetation, invasive species and noxious weeds (Photos 10, 11) including a stand of Russian olive trees (Elaeagnus angustifolia) in the northwest portion of the property (Photo 12). 6.0 PROTECTION OF WILDLIFE HABITAT AREAS §7-202 The following measures will reduce the impacts of the proposed development on wildlife. 6.1 Site planning 1. Clustering - Clustered development and infrastructure minimizes impact by overlapping the zone of influence resulting from human activity associated with residential development. The proposed development is highly clustered on a previously developed parcel adjacent to dense residential and commercial development. 2. Fencing – Fencing that is incompatible with wildlife movements can result in direct wildlife mortality, restricted or blocked movement, and reduction of habitat effectiveness. a. No fences should be placed below the crest of the west-facing slope on the west side of the property. b. Other than those necessary for facility security, fences should meet the standards for wildlife-friendly fencing described in the CPW Fencing with Wildlife in Mind publication (Available online at Wildlife & Ecological Assessment - Eastbank FedEx February 18, 2015 COLORADO WILDLIFE SCIENCE, LLC | PROTECTION OF WILDLIFE HABITAT AREAS §7-202 10 https://cpw.state.co.us/Documents/LandWater/PrivateLandPrograms/Fencing WithWildlifeInMind.pdf). 6.1 Native vegetation 1. Native vegetation should be preserved to the maximum extent possible except where management is necessary to reduce wildfire hazards. 2. Native vegetation should be preserved on the slopes at the western end of the property. 6.2 Other Measures to Minimize Impacts 1. Noxious Weeds should be managed by means of an Integrated Weed Management strategy in compliance with the current Garfield County Weed Management Plan. Wildlife & Ecological Assessment - Eastbank FedEx February 18, 2015 COLORADO WILDLIFE SCIENCE, LLC | 7.0 LITERATURE CITED 11 7.0 LITERATURE CITED Bailey, A. M., and R. J. Niedrach. 1965. Birds of Colorado. Denver Museum of Natural History, Denver, CO. Bailey, R. G. 1976. Ecoregions of the United States. USDA Forest Service, Washington, D.C. Bailey, R. G. 1995. Description of the ecoregions of the United States. 2nd edition. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington, DC. Bailey, R. G., United States Geological Survey, and United States Forest Service. 1998. Ecoregions of North America. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington, D.C. Barbknecht, A. E., W. S. Fairbanks, J. D. Rogerson, E. J. Maichak, B. M. Scurlock, and L. L. Meadows. 2011. Elk parturition site selection at local and landscape scales. The Journal of Wildlife Management 75:646– 654. Boyle, S. 2006. North American River Otter (Lontra canadensis): a technical conservation assessment. Available online at http://www.fs.fed.us/r2/projects/scp/assessments/northamericanriverotter.pdf. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region. . Colorado Division of Parks & Wildlife. 2014. CPW All Species Activity Mapping Data. Available online at http://www.arcgis.com/home/group.html?owner=rsacco&title=Colorado%20Parks%20and%20Wild life%20-%20Species%20Activity%20Data. Colorado Parks & Wildlife, , Fort Collins, CO. Colorado Division of Parks & Wildlife. 2015a. Colorado Listing of Endangered, Threatened and Wildlife Species of Special Concern – Species Pages. Available online at http://cpw.state.co.us/learn/Pages/SOC-ThreatenedEndangeredList.aspx. Colorado Division of Parks & Wildlife. 2015b. Colorado Wildlife Species Profile Page - Bald Eagle. Available online at http://cpw.state.co.us/learn/Pages/SpeciesProfiles.aspx. Colorado Department of Natural Resources, Division of Parks & Wildlife, Fort Collins, CO. Dexter, C. 1998. River survey of west-central Colorado, for yellow-billed cuckoo and riparian weeds. Report prepared for the Bureau of Land Management. Bureau of Land Management, Grand Junction, CO. 26 pp. Durkin, P. 2009. Spiranthes diluvialis (Ute Ladies’-tresses orchid) 2008 Survey Report, Glenwood South Bridge Environmental Assessment. State of Colorado Department of Transportation, Grand Junction, Colorado. Fertig, W., R. Black, and P. Wolken. 2005. Rangewide status review of Ute ladies’-tresses (Spiranthes diluvialis). Prepared for the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service and Central Utah Water Conservancy District. 101 pp. Gaines, D., and S. A. Laymon. 1984. Decline, status and preservation of the yellow-billed cuckoo in California. Western Birds 15:49-80. Kelsall, J. P., and W. Prescott. 1971. Moose and deer behaviour in snow in Fundy National Park, New Brunswick. Canandian Wildlife Service Report 15. Kingery, H. E. 1998. Colorado breeding bird atlas. Colorado Bird Atlas Partnership : Colorado Division of Wildlife, Denver, Colo. Laymon, S. A. 1980. Feeding and nesting behavior of the yellow-billed cuckoo in the Sacramento Valley. Loveless, C. M. 1967. Ecological characteristics of Mule Deer winter range. Technical Publication 20. Colorado Department of Game, Fish and Parks. McKelvey, K. S., K. B. Aubry, and Y. K. Ortega. 2000. History and distribution of lynx in the contiguous United States. Pages 207-264 in L. F. Ruggiero, K. B. Aubry, S. W. Buskirk, G. M. Koehler, C. J. Krebs, K. S. McKelvey, and J. R. Squires, editors. Ecology and conservation of lynx in the United States. University Press of Colorado, Denver, CO. Wildlife & Ecological Assessment - Eastbank FedEx February 18, 2015 COLORADO WILDLIFE SCIENCE, LLC | 7.0 LITERATURE CITED 12 NatureServe. 2005. NatureServe Explorer: An online encyclopedia of life [web application]. Version 4.1. NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia. Available online at http://www.natureserve.org/explorer. NatureServe. 2015. NatureServe Explorer: An online encyclopedia of life [web application]. Version 7.1. NatureServe Web Service, Arlington, Virginia. Available online at http://www.natureserve.org/explorer. Omernik, J. M. 1987. Ecoregions of the conterminous United States. Map (scale 1:7,500,000). Annals of the Association of American Geographers 77:118-125. Parker, K. L., Charles T. Robbins, and Thomas A. Hanley. 1984. Energy expenditures for locomotion by mule deer and elk. Journal of Wildlife Management 48:474-488. Phillips, G. E., and A. W. Alldredge. 2000. Reproductive success of elk following disturbance by humans during calving season. Journal of Wildlife Management 64:521-530. Rearden, S. N., R. G. Anthony, and B. K. Johnson. 2011. Birth-site selection and predation risk of Rocky Mountain elk. Journal of Mammalogy 92:1118-1126. Rinkevich, S. E., J. L. Ganey, J. L. W. Jr., G. C. White, D. L. Urban, A. B. Franklin, W. M. Block, and E. Clemente. 1995. General biology and ecological relationships of the Mexican Spotted Owl,. Pages 19-35 in K. J. Cook, editor. Recovery plan for the Mexican Spotted Owl. Vol. I. USDI Fish and Wildl. Serv., Albuquerque, NM. Seidel, J. W. 1977a. Elk calving behavior in west central Colorado. Pages 38-40 in Colorado Division of Wildlife, editor. Proceedings of the Western States Elk Workshop. Colorado Division of Wildlife, Denver. Seidel, J. W. 1977b. Elk calving habitat. USDA Forest Service Handbook 2509.25 – Watershed Conservation Practices Handbook, zero code, Ch. 10, and Ch.20. Region 2 Amendment No. 2509.25 – 99 – 1. Effective March 22, 1999. Colorado Division of Wildlife and USDA Forest Service, Grand Junction, CO. Shenk, T. 2009. Lynx Update, May 25, 2009. Available: http://wildlife.state.co.us/NR/rdonlyres/1E7C95D0- 53F3-41EB-82DD-26134C0FF261/0/LynxUpdateMay252009.pdf. Colorado Division of Wildlife, Fort Collins, CO. Shenk, T. M., and R. H. Kahn. 2010. The Colorado lynx reintroduction program. Colorado Division of Wildlife, Denver, CO. Theobald, D. M., and T. M. Shenk. 2011. Areas of high habitat use from 1999-2010 for radio-collared Canada lynx reintroduced to Colorado. Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO. Toweill, D. E., J. W. Thomas, and D. P. Metz. 2002. North American elk: ecology and management. 1st edition. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington [D.C.]. Ungulate Winter Range Technical Advisory Team. 2005. Desired conditions for Mule Deer, Elk, and Moose winter range in the Southern Interior of British Columbia. B.C. Ministry of Water, Land and Air Protection, Biodiversity Branch. Victoria, BC. Wildl. Bull. No. B-120. 18pp. United States Fish & Wildlife Service. 2006. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Designation of Critical Habitat for the Contiguous United States Distinct Population Segment of the Canada lynx; Final Rule. November 9, 2006. 71 FR 66008-66061. USDA Forest Service. 2002. Lynx habitat parameters, White River National Forest. Unpub. Forest Service document. Glenwood Springs. CO. 3pp. plus LAU spreadsheet (subject to further revision-last available update 02/11/2005). USFWS. 1982. Habitat Suitability Index Models: Mule Deer. Draft. USFWS, and USFS. 2010. Inter-Agency Southern Rockies Lynx Project Decision Screen. Unpublished Report of Southern Rocky Mountain Lynx Conservation Interagency Team. 22 pp plus attachments. U.S. Forest Service, Denver, CO, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Grand Jct, CO. Oct. 2010. Wildlife & Ecological Assessment - Eastbank FedEx February 18, 2015 COLORADO WILDLIFE SCIENCE, LLC | 8.0 BACKGROUND & QUALIFICATIONS 13 8.0 BACKGROUND & QUALIFICATIONS Colorado Wildlife Science, LLC (CWS) is a small wildlife and ecological consulting firm based in Basalt, Colorado, specializing in wildlife research, management, and monitoring, ecological assessments, baseline inventories, ecological planning, habitat management, and ecological restoration. CWS applies a scientifically sound approach to biological resource studies and management. Our work combines professional integrity and strong academic training with extensive experience working for government, private, and non- profit clients. With an extensive network of professional collaborators that includes plant ecologists, foresters, hydrologists, and soil scientists, CWS leverages the collective knowledge of experienced professionals working toward practical, effective and cost saving solutions. CWS provides expert services to a diverse array of clients. Since we are a small company, personal attention is ensured. We combine full in-house GIS (ArcGIS) with real-time, sub- meter GPS to provide state-of-the-art spatial data, analyses, maps, and presentations. We have prepared Biological Assessments and Biological Evaluations, and contributed to EAs and EISs. CWS has worked with large private firms such as Jacobs, Carter and Burgess, Parsons, CH2MHILL, and SAIC as well as city and county agencies and governments such as City of Aspen, City of Glenwood Springs, Pitkin County, Colorado Department of Transportation, and Roaring Fork Transportation Agency. Owner and Wildlife Biologist Jonathan Lowsky, M.S. Wildlife Biology, Colorado State University, has a broad range of knowledge. With more than 20 years of professional experience with federal (US Forest Service), state (Colorado Division of Wildlife), and county agencies as well as two major universities (Colorado State University and University of Washington), Jonathan’s career has focused on a diverse array of wildlife from bighorn sheep, elk, and songbirds to northern goshawks, flying squirrels, small mammals, and spotted bats. Mr. Lowsky’s experience includes biological assessments and evaluations for NEPA compliance, conservation planning, GIS mapping and modeling, wildlife research, and ecological monitoring design and implementation, as well as wetland and riparian delineations, evaluations, and restoration. He has authored management plans and conservation easement baseline inventory reports and published scientific papers. An expert birder, experienced tracker, certified wetlands delineator, and passionate observer of wildlife, Jonathan has spent countless hours studying and appreciating Colorado’s diverse ecological communities. Jonathan Lowsky completed the US Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineator Certification Program in 1999 and the Wildland Hydrology (Dave Rosgen) Applied Fluvial Geomorphology Course in 2001. This training has contributed to the quality and success of the wetlands delineations and wetlands and stream restoration projects Mr. Lowsky has completed and contributed to over the last 12 years. Prior to the inception of Colorado Wildlife Science, Jonathan served as the Pitkin County Wildlife Biologist for more than 6 years. In that role, he acted as the County’s wetlands, stream, and riparian expert. A detailed description of Mr. Lowsky’s professional experience and references are available. For additional information, please visit our website at coloradowildlifescience.com. Wildlife & Ecological Assessment - Eastbank FedEx February 18, 2015 COLORADO WILDLIFE SCIENCE, LLC | MAPS 14 WILDLIFE ASSESSMENT OF DEVELOPMENT FOR COUNTY SITE PLAN REVIEW MAPS EASTBANK FEDERAL EXPRESS PROPERTY Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i-cubed 107°17'30"W 107°17'30"W 107°17'40"W 107°17'40"W 107°17'50"W 107°17'50"W 107°18'0"W 107°18'0"W107°18'10"W 39 ° 2 9 ' 1 2 " N 39 ° 2 9 ' 1 2 " N 39 ° 2 9 ' 4 " N 39 ° 2 9 ' 4 " N 39 ° 2 8 ' 5 6 " N 39 ° 2 8 ' 5 6 " N Ecological Assessment of Ecological Assessment of Commercial Development forCommercial Development forMinor Subdivision Application Minor Subdivision Application COLORADO WILDLIFE SCIENCE LLC 0100 Elk Run Dr, Ste 128, Basalt, CO 81621970.927.4549info@coloradowildlifescience.comhttp://coloradowildlifescience.com Basemap Source(s): Date Prepared: 2015-02-23 o Area of Detail 1 in = 250 feet Figure 1. Aerial View & Vegetation 0 100 200 300 400 50050 Feet Legend: Bing Maps Coordinate System: NAD83 State Plane Colorado Central Project No 1500202 Eastbank Federal Express Facility¬«82 Disturbed - Commercial Development/Road Disturbed Vegetation/Bare Soil Hay Field Pavement Riparian Shrubland Riverine Sagebrush Shrubland Parcel Boundary Note: Not a survey. Parcel boundaries are approximate. Rio Grande Trail Legend 0 500 1,000250 Feet 1 inch equals 625 feet Parcel Boundary A. Bald Eagle B. Black Bear Bald Eagle Winter Range Bald Eagle Winter Foraging Area Black Bear - Human Conflict Area Black Bear Fall Concentration Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i-cubedArea of Detail Ecological Assessment of Ecological Assessment of Commercial Development forCommercial Development forMinor Subdivision Application Minor Subdivision Application Eastbank Federal Express Facility o COLORADO WILDLIFE SCIENCE LLC 0100 Elk Run Dr, Ste 128, Basalt, CO 81621970.927.4549info@coloradowildlifescience.comhttp://coloradowildlifescience.com Basemap Source(s): Date Prepared: 2015-02-23 Bing Maps Coordinate System: NAD83 State Plane Colorado Central Project No 1500202 Note: Not a survey. Parcel boundaries are approximate. Figure 3. CPW Species Activity Mapping -Bald Eagle & Black Bear Legend 0 500 1,000250 Feet 1 inch equals 625 feet Parcel Boundary A. Mule Deer B. Rocky Mountain Elk Winter Range Severe Winter Range Winter Concentration Area Elk Production Area Summer Range Migration Corridor Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i-cubedArea of Detail Ecological Assessment of Ecological Assessment of Commercial Development forCommercial Development forMinor Subdivision Application Minor Subdivision Application Eastbank Federal Express Facility o COLORADO WILDLIFE SCIENCE LLC 0100 Elk Run Dr, Ste 128, Basalt, CO 81621970.927.4549info@coloradowildlifescience.comhttp://coloradowildlifescience.com Basemap Source(s): Date Prepared: 2015-02-23 Bing Maps Coordinate System: NAD83 State Plane Colorado Central Project No 1500202 Note: Not a survey. Parcel boundaries are approximate. Figure 3. CPW Species Activity Mapping -Mule Deer & Rocky Mountain Elk Wildlife Assessment - EASTBANK FEDERAL EXPRESS PROPERTY February 27, 2015 WILDLIFE ASSESSMENT OF DEVELOPMENT FOR COUNTY ACTIVITY ENVELOPE & SITE PLAN REVIEW PHOTOS EASTBANK FEDERAL EXPRESS PROPERTY Wildlife & Ecological Assessment - Eastbank FedEx February 18, 2015 COLORADO WILDLIFE SCIENCE, LLC | PHOTOS 19 Photo 1. Property is comprised of a series of terraces or benches Photo 2. Dirt access road Wildlife & Ecological Assessment - Eastbank FedEx February 18, 2015 COLORADO WILDLIFE SCIENCE, LLC | PHOTOS 20 Photo 3. Lower dirt access road to Parcel 2B Photo 4. Higher quality sagebrush shrubland Wildlife & Ecological Assessment - Eastbank FedEx February 18, 2015 COLORADO WILDLIFE SCIENCE, LLC | PHOTOS 21 Photo 5. Poor quality, disturbed sagebrush shrubland with no understory vegetation Photo 6. Due to disturbance, rabbitbrush approaches co-dominance in remnant sagebrush stands Wildlife & Ecological Assessment - Eastbank FedEx February 18, 2015 COLORADO WILDLIFE SCIENCE, LLC | PHOTOS 22 Photo 7. Scotch thistle is a problem on the property Photo 8. Elk pellets were common on the February site assessment Wildlife & Ecological Assessment - Eastbank FedEx February 18, 2015 COLORADO WILDLIFE SCIENCE, LLC | PHOTOS 23 Photo 9. Elk tracks were observed during the site visit Photo 10. The property is highly disturbed with large areas of bare soil and weeds Wildlife & Ecological Assessment - Eastbank FedEx February 18, 2015 COLORADO WILDLIFE SCIENCE, LLC | PHOTOS 24 Photo 11. Non-native, invasive species and bare ground dominate large portions of the property ` Photo 12. Russian olive stand on the northwest end of the property Wildlife & Ecological Assessment - Eastbank FedEx February 18, 2015 COLORADO WILDLIFE SCIENCE, LLC | APPENDIX A: CPW SAM mule deer and elk seasonal activity area definitions 25 APPENDIX A: CPW SAM mule deer and elk seasonal activity area definitions ROCKY MOUNTAIN ELK HIGHWAY CROSSING: Those areas where elk movements traditionally cross roads, presenting potential conflicts between elk and motorists. MIGRATION CORRIDORS: A specific mappable site through which large numbers of animals migrate and loss of which would change migration routes. PRODUCTION AREA: That part of the overall range of elk occupied by the females from May 15 to June 15 for calving. (Only known areas are mapped and this does not include all production areas for the DAU). RESIDENT POPULATION: An area used year-round by a population of elk. Individuals could be found in any part of the area at any time of the year; the area cannot be subdivided into seasonal ranges. It is most likely included within the overall range of the larger population. SEVERE WINTER: That part of the range of a species where 90 percent of the individuals are located when the annual snowpack is at its maximum and/or temperatures are at a minimum in the two worst winters out of ten. The winter of 1983-84 is a good example of a severe winter. SUMMER CONCENTRATION: Those areas where elk concentrate from mid-June through mid-August. High quality forage, security, and lack of disturbance are characteristics of these areas to meet the high energy demands of lactation, calf rearing, antler growth, and general preparation for the rigors of fall and winter. SUMMER RANGE: That part of the range of a species where 90% of the individuals are located between spring green-up and the first heavy snowfall, or during a site specific period of summer as defined for each DAU. Summer range is not necessarily exclusive of winter range; in some areas winter range and summer range may overlap. WINTER CONCENTRATION: That part of the winter range of a species where densities are at least 200% greater than the surrounding winter range density during the same period used to define winter range in the average five winters out of ten. WINTER RANGE: That part of the overall range of a species where 90 percent of the individuals are located during the average five winters out of ten from the first heavy snowfall to spring green-up, or during a site specific period of winter as defined for each DAU. MULE DEER CONCENTRATION AREA: That part of the overall range where higher quality habitat supports significantly higher densities than surrounding areas. These areas are typically occupied year round and are not necessarily associated with a specific season. Includes rough break country, riparian areas, small drainages, and large areas of irrigated cropland. HIGHWAY CROSSING: Those areas where mule deer movements traditionally cross roads, presenting potential conflicts between mule deer and motorists. MIGRATION CORRIDORS: A specific mappable site through which large numbers of animals migrate and loss of which would change migration routes. RESIDENT POPULATION: An area that provides year-round range for a population of mule deer. The resident mule deer use all of the area all year; it cannot be subdivided into seasonal ranges although it may be included within the overall range of the larger population. SEVERE WINTER: That part of the overall range where 90% of the individuals are located when the annual snowpack is at its maximum and/or temperatures are at a minimum in the two worst winters out of ten. SUMMER RANGE: That part of the overall range where 90% of the individuals are located between spring green- up and the first heavy snowfall. Summer range is not necessarily exclusive of winter range; in some areas winter range and summer range may overlap. WINTER CONCENTRATION: That part of the winter range where densities are at least 200% greater than the surrounding winter range density during the same period used to define winter range in the average five winters out of ten. WINTER RANGE: That part of the overall range where 90 percent of the individuals are located during the average five winters out of ten from the first heavy snowfall to spring green-up, or during a site specific period of winter as defined for each DAU. Wildlife & Ecological Assessment - Eastbank FedEx February 18, 2015 COLORADO WILDLIFE SCIENCE, LLC | APPENDIX B: State of Colorado Threatened & Endangered Vertebrates 26 APPENDIX B: State of Colorado Threatened & Endangered Vertebrates COMMON NAME LATIN NAME STATUS AMPHIBIANS Boreal Toad Bufo boreas boreas SE Northern Cricket Frog Acris crepitans SC Great Plains Narrowmouth Toad Gastrophryne olivacea SC Northern Leopard Frog Rana pipiens SC Wood Frog Rana sylvatica SC Plains Leopard Frog Rana blairi SC Couch's Spadefoot Scaphiopus couchii SC BIRDS Whooping Crane Grus americana FE, SE Least Tern Sterna antillarum FE, SE Southwestern Willow Flycatcher Empidonax traillii extimus FE, SE Plains Sharp-Tailed Grouse Tympanuchus phasianellus jamesii SE Piping Plover Charadrius melodus circumcinctus FT, ST Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus ST Mexican Spotted Owl Strix occidentalis lucida FT, ST Burrowing Owl Athene cunicularia ST Lesser Prairie-Chicken Tympanuchus pallidicinctus ST Western Yellow-Billed Cuckoo Coccyzus americanus SC Greater Sandhill Crane Grus canadensis tabida SC Ferruginous Hawk Buteo regalis SC Gunnison Sage-Grouse Centrocercus minimus SC American Peregrine Falcon Falco peregrinus anatum SC Greater Sage Grouse Centrocercus urophasianus SC Western Snowy Plover Charadrius alexandrinus SC Mountain Plover Charadrius montanus SC Long-Billed Curlew Numenius americanus SC Columbian Sharp-Tailed Grouse Tympanuchus phasianellus columbianus SC FISH Bonytail Gila elegans FE, SE Razorback Sucker Xyrauchen texanus FE, SE Humpback Chub Gila cypha FE, ST Colorado Pikeminnow Ptychocheilus lucius FE, ST Greenback Cutthroat Trout Oncorhynchus clarki stomias FT, ST Rio Grande Sucker Catostomus plebeius SE Lake Chub Couesius plumbeus SE Plains Minnow Hybognathus placitus SE Suckermouth Minnow Phenacobius mirabilis SE Northern Redbelly Dace Phoxinus eos SE Southern Redbelly Dace Phoxinus erythrogaster SE Brassy Minnow Hybognathus hankinsoni ST Wildlife & Ecological Assessment - Eastbank FedEx February 18, 2015 COLORADO WILDLIFE SCIENCE, LLC | APPENDIX B: State of Colorado Threatened & Endangered Vertebrates 27 COMMON NAME LATIN NAME STATUS Common Shiner Luxilus cornutus ST Arkansas Darter Etheostoma cragini ST Mountain Sucker Catostomus playtrhynchus SC Plains Orangethroat Darter Etheostoma spectabile SC Iowa Darter Etheostoma exile SC Rio Grande Chub Gila pandora SC Colorado Roundtail Chub Gila robusta SC Stonecat Noturus flavus SC Colorado River Cutthroat Trout Oncorhynchus clarki pleuriticus SC Rio Grande Cutthroat Trout Oncorhynchus clarki virginalis SC Flathead Chub Platygobio gracilus SC MAMMALS Gray Wolf Canis lupus FE, SE Black-Footed Ferret Mustela nigripes FE, SE Grizzly Bear Ursus arctos FT, SE Preble's Meadow Jumping Mouse Zapus hudsonius preblei FT, ST Lynx Lynx canadensis FT, SE Wolverine Gulo gulo SE River Otter Lontra canadensis ST Kit Fox Vulpes macrotis SE Townsend's Big-Eared Bat Corynorhinus townsendii pallescens SC Black-Tailed Prairie Dog Cynomys ludovicianus SC Botta's Pocket Gopher Thomomy bottae rubidus SC Northern Pocket Gopher Thomomys talpoides macrotis SC Swift fox Vulpes velox SC REPTILES Triploid Checkered Whiptail Cnemidophorus neotesselatus SC Midget Faded Rattlesnake Crotalus viridis concolor SC Longnose Leopard Lizard Gambelia wislizenii SC Yellow Mud Turtle Kinosternon flavescens SC Common King Snake Lampropeltis getula SC Texas Blind Snake Leptotyphlops dulcis SC Texas Horned Lizard Phrynosoma cornutum SC Roundtail Horned Lizard Phrynosoma modestum SC Massasauga Sistrurus catenatus SC Common Garter Snake Thamnophis sirtalis SC Wildlife & Ecological Assessment - Eastbank FedEx February 18, 2015 COLORADO WILDLIFE SCIENCE, LLC | APPENDIX C: U.S. Fish & Wildlife Consultation Letter 28 APPENDIX C: U.S. Fish & Wildlife Consultation Letter United States Department of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Western Colorado Ecological Services Field Office 445 WEST GUNNISON AVENUE, SUITE 240 GRAND JUNCTION, CO 81501 PHONE: (970)243-2778 FAX: (970)245-6933 URL: www.fws.gov/mountain-prairie/es/Colorado/; www.fws.gov/platteriver/ Consultation Code: 06E24100-2015-SLI-0070 February 20, 2015 Event Code: 06E24100-2015-E-00096 Project Name: Eastbank LLC Minor Subdivision Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project location, and/or may be affected by your proposed project To Whom It May Concern: The enclosed species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as well as proposed and final designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. The species list fulfills the requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 ).et seq. New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list. The purpose of the Act is to provide a means whereby threatened and endangered species and the ecosystems upon which they depend may be conserved. Under sections 7(a)(1) and 7(a)(2) of the Act and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 402 ), Federal agencies are requiredet seq. to utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of threatened and endangered species and to determine whether projects may affect threatened and endangered species and/or designated critical habitat. A Biological Assessment is required for construction projects (or other undertakings having similar physical impacts) that are major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the human environment as defined in the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2) (c)). For projects other than major construction activities, the Service suggests that a biological evaluation similar to a Biological Assessment be prepared to determine whether the project may affect listed or proposed species and/or designated or proposed critical habitat. Recommended contents of a Biological Assessment are described at 50 CFR 402.12. If a Federal agency determines, based on the Biological Assessment or biological evaluation, that listed species and/or designated critical habitat may be affected by the proposed project, the agency is required to consult with the Service pursuant to 50 CFR 402. In addition, the Service recommends that candidate species, proposed species and proposed critical habitat be addressed within the consultation. More information on the regulations and procedures for section 7 consultation, including the role of permit or license applicants, can be found in the "Endangered Species Consultation Handbook" at: http://www.fws.gov/endangered/esa-library/pdf/TOC-GLOS.PDF Please be aware that bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 668 ), and projects affecting these species may requireet seq. development of an eagle conservation plan (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/eagle_guidance.html). Additionally, wind energy projects should follow the wind energy guidelines (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/) for minimizing impacts to migratory birds and bats. Guidance for minimizing impacts to migratory birds for projects including communications towers (e.g., cellular, digital television, radio, and emergency broadcast) can be found at: http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdIssues/Hazards/towers/towers.htm; http://www.towerkill.com; and http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdIssues/Hazards/towers/comtow.html. We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Tracking Number in the header of this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project that you submit to our office. Attachment 2 http://ecos.fws.gov/ipac, 02/20/2015 11:50 AM 1 Official Species List Provided by: Western Colorado Ecological Services Field Office 445 WEST GUNNISON AVENUE, SUITE 240 GRAND JUNCTION, CO 81501 (970) 243-2778 http://www.fws.gov/mountain-prairie/es/Colorado/ http://www.fws.gov/platteriver/ Consultation Code: 06E24100-2015-SLI-0070 Event Code: 06E24100-2015-E-00096 Project Type: Development Project Name: Eastbank LLC Minor Subdivision Project Description: The applicants are proposing a minor subdivision in unincorporated Garfield County, CO. Please Note: The FWS office may have modified the Project Name and/or Project Description, so it may be different from what was submitted in your previous request. If the Consultation Code matches, the FWS considers this to be the same project. Contact the office in the 'Provided by' section of your previous Official Species list if you have any questions or concerns. United States Department of Interior Fish and Wildlife Service Project name: Eastbank LLC Minor Subdivision http://ecos.fws.gov/ipac, 02/20/2015 11:50 AM 2 Project Location Map: Project Coordinates: MULTIPOLYGON (((-107.2987182 39.4832561, -107.2982758 39.4832662, -107.2978429 39.4833376, -107.2974335 39.4834678, -107.2971597 39.4835955, - 107.2963994 39.4840748, -107.2966856 39.4842622, -107.2953007 39.4852885, -107.2946157 39.4851162, -107.2946275 39.4850018, -107.2943813 39.4847753, -107.2931959 39.4838864, - 107.2927251 39.4835863, -107.2918394 39.4830974, -107.2926094 39.4822911, -107.2938882 39.4825088, -107.2949875 39.4827522, -107.2964821 39.4827132, -107.2966276 39.4827468, - 107.2970222 39.4827114, -107.2970482 39.4830426, -107.2979104 39.4828825, -107.2980423 39.4828263, -107.2980309 39.482776, -107.298361 39.4826853, -107.2989444 39.482464, - 107.2994829 39.4821912, -107.3002298 39.482081, -107.3015895 39.4822653, -107.301664 39.4825349, -107.3016692 39.483101, -107.3017915 39.4838232, -107.3019264 39.4841698, - 107.3020894 39.4844609, -107.3022381 39.4849312, -107.3020285 39.4850761, -107.3017994 39.4854635, -107.3017742 39.4858113, -107.3016081 39.4861594, -107.3015361 39.4863927, - 107.3010098 39.4867729, -107.3010092 39.4849134, -107.3008636 39.4844708, -107.3005864 39.4840676, -107.3001935 39.4837272, -107.2998361 39.4835248, -107.2992981 39.4833382, - United States Department of Interior Fish and Wildlife Service Project name: Eastbank LLC Minor Subdivision http://ecos.fws.gov/ipac, 02/20/2015 11:50 AM 3 107.2987182 39.4832561))) Project Counties: Garfield, CO United States Department of Interior Fish and Wildlife Service Project name: Eastbank LLC Minor Subdivision http://ecos.fws.gov/ipac, 02/20/2015 11:50 AM 4 Endangered Species Act Species List There are a total of 10 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on your species list. Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species list because a project could affect downstream species. Critical habitats listed under the Has Critical Habitat column may or may not lie within your project area. See the Critical habitats within your project area section further below for critical habitat that lies within your project. Please contact the designated FWS office if you have questions. Birds Status Has Critical Habitat Condition(s) Greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) Population: entire Candidate Mexican Spotted owl (Strix occidentalis lucida) Population: Entire Threatened Final designated Yellow-Billed Cuckoo (Coccyzus americanus) Population: Western U.S. DPS Threatened Proposed Fishes Bonytail chub (Gila elegans) Population: Entire Endangered Final designated Colorado pikeminnow (Ptychocheilus lucius) Population: Entire, except EXPN Endangered Final designated Greenback Cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarki stomias) Population: Entire Threatened United States Department of Interior Fish and Wildlife Service Project name: Eastbank LLC Minor Subdivision http://ecos.fws.gov/ipac, 02/20/2015 11:50 AM 5 Humpback chub (Gila cypha) Population: Entire Endangered Final designated Razorback sucker (Xyrauchen texanus) Population: Entire Endangered Final designated Flowering Plants Ute ladies'-tresses (Spiranthes diluvialis) Threatened Mammals Canada Lynx (Lynx canadensis) Population: (Contiguous U.S. DPS) Threatened United States Department of Interior Fish and Wildlife Service Project name: Eastbank LLC Minor Subdivision http://ecos.fws.gov/ipac, 02/20/2015 11:50 AM 6 Critical habitats that lie within your project area There are no critical habitats within your project area. United States Department of Interior Fish and Wildlife Service Project name: Eastbank LLC Minor Subdivision Nicole Garrimone-Campagna, Esq. March 25, 2015 Garfield & Hecht, P.C. 420 Seventh Street, Suite 1000 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 RE: Eastbank, LLC – Lot 2 Existing Well Water Quality Results Dear Nicole: This letter report presents the technical analysis of the water quality for the existing well located on the proposed Lot 2 of the Eastbank, LLC Minor Subdivision located within Parcel 2A of Eastbank Parcel 2 Lot Split in Garfield County, Colorado. This letter supplements the March 10, 2015 Well Pumping Test Results Report prepared by Resource Engineering, Inc. (RESOURCE). WATER QUALITY A water sample for the existing well was obtained by RESOURCE on March 3, 2015. The sample was shipped by overnight delivery under proper chain of custody to National Testing Laboratories (results attached). The water in the well was tested for inorganic compounds including metals, coliform, alkalinity, corrosivity, hardness, pH, total dissolved solids, and radionuclides, in accordance with the criteria in the Garfield County Land Use and Development Code. The results indicate that the well water meets the basic EPA primary and secondary drinking water standards. The well water hardness is high at 290 mg/l, which is considered very hard. The hard water can cause scale to build up on water fixtures and lessen effectiveness of soaps. RESOURCE recommends use of a water softener to lower the hardness of the water. CONCLUSION The laboratory results for the water quality analysis indicate that the water meets all primary and secondary drinking water standards. The hard water can be addressed with standard water softening equipment. The water quality results indicate that the water in the well is suitable for domestic uses. Please call if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, RESOURCE ENGINEERING, INC. Michael J. Erion, P.E. Water Resources Engineer MJE/mmm 1325-17.1 Attachments These results may be invalid. Ordered By: Resource Engineering 909 Colorado Avenue Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 ATTN: Ryan McBride Client: This informational water quality report compares the actual test result to national standards as defined in the EPA's Primary and Secondary Drinking Water Regulations. Informational Water Quality Report Sample Number: Collection Date and Time: Received Date and Time: Date Completed: 852175 3/3/2015 14:45 3/5/2015 08:55 3/18/2015 Well Water Definition and Legend The contaminant was not detected in the sample above the minimum detection level. The contaminant was detected at or above the minimum detection level, but not above the referenced standard. The contaminant was detected above the standard, which is not an EPA enforceable MCL. The contaminant was detected above the EPA enforceable MCL. mg/L (ppm): The lowest level that the laboratory can detect a contaminant. ND:The contaminant was not detected above the minimum detection level. Minimum Detection Level (MDL): Unless otherwise indicated, results and standards are expressed as an amount in milligrams per liter or parts per million. Fed-Ex Existing Well, 1325-17.1Location: Type of Water: Well-Check (+Dis Fe, Tann, & Corr) Primary Standards:Are expressed as the maximum contaminant level (MCL) which is the highest level of contaminant that is allowed in drinking water. MCLs are enforceable standards. Secondary standards:Are non-enforceable guidelines regulating contaminants that may cause cosmetic effects (such as skin or tooth discoloration) or aesthetic effects (such as taste, odor,or color) in drinking water. Individual states may choose to adopt them as enforceable standards. Action levels:Are defined in treatment techniques which are required processes intended to reduce the level of a contaminant in drinking water. 6571 Wilson Mills Rd Cleveland, Ohio 44143 1-800-458-3330 NA:The contaminant was not analyzed. Microbiologicals Total Coliform and E.coli were ABSENT, however bacteria results may be invalid due to lack of collection information or because sample has exceeded 30 hour holding time. Total Coliform by P/A Inorganic Analytes - Metals NDAluminum mg/L 0.2 EPA Secondary 0.1 NDArsenic mg/L 0.010 EPA Primary 0.005 NDBarium mg/L 2 EPA Primary 0.30 NDCadmium mg/L 0.005 EPA Primary 0.002 75.1Calcium mg/L --2.0 NDChromium mg/L 0.1 EPA Primary 0.010 NDCopper mg/L 1.3 EPA Action Level 0.004 NDIron mg/L 0.3 EPA Secondary 0.020 NDIron-Dissolved mg/L --0.020 NDLead mg/L 0.015 EPA Action Level 0.002 24.30Magnesium mg/L --0.10 NDManganese mg/L 0.05 EPA Secondary 0.004 NDMercury mg/L 0.002 EPA Primary 0.001 NDNickel mg/L --0.020 2.9Potassium mg/L --1.0 NDSelenium mg/L 0.05 EPA Primary 0.020 17.4Silica mg/L --0.1 NDSilver mg/L 0.100 EPA Secondary 0.002 11Sodium mg/L --1 NDZinc mg/L 5 EPA Secondary 0.004 Physical Factors 220Alkalinity (Total as CaCO3)mg/L --20 290Hardness mg/L 100 NTL Internal 10 7.5pH pH Units 6.5 to 8.5 EPA Secondary Status Contaminant Results Units National Standards Min. Detection Level Page 2 of 3 Sample: 852175Product: Well-Check (+Dis Fe, Tann, & Corr)3/18/2015 10:04:28 AM 440Total Dissolved Solids mg/L 500 EPA Secondary 20 0.2Turbidity NTU 1.0 EPA Action Level 0.1 Inorganic Analytes - Other 11.0Chloride mg/L 250 EPA Secondary 5.0 NDFluoride mg/L 4.0 EPA Primary 0.5 NDNitrate as N mg/L 10 EPA Primary 0.5 NDNitrite as N mg/L 1 EPA Primary 0.5 NDOrtho Phosphate mg/L --2.0 170.0Sulfate mg/L 250 EPA Secondary 5.0 NDTannin/Lignin mg/L --0.5 We certify that the analyses performed for this report are accurate, and that the laboratory tests were conducted by methods approved by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency or variations of these EPA methods. These test results are intended to be used for informational purposes only and may not be used for regulatory compliance. National Testing Laboratories, Ltd. NATIONAL TESTING LABORATORIES, LTD Status Contaminant Results Units National Standards Min. Detection Level Page 3 of 3 Sample: 852175Product: Well-Check (+Dis Fe, Tann, & Corr)3/18/2015 10:04:28 AM Informational Water Quality Report Rads Basic Client: Ordered By: Resource Engineering 909 Colorado Avenue Glenwood Springs , CO 81601 ATIN : Ryan McBride Definition and Legend Sample Number: Type of Water . Collectlon Date and Time . Received Date and Time. Date Completed : 852184 6571 \Mlson Mills Rd Cleveland, Ohio 44143 1-800458-3330 Fed-Ex Existing Well, 1325-17 . 1 Well Water 3/3/2015 14"45 3/5/2015 08 55 3116/2015 This informational water quality report compares the actual test result to national standards as defined in the EPA's Primary and Secondary Drinking Water Regulations. Primary Standards: Are expressed as the maximum contaminant level (MCL) which is the highest level of contaminant that is allowed in drinking water. MCLs are enforceable standards . Secondary standards: Are non-enforceable guidelines regulating contaminants that may cause cosmetic effects (such as skin or tooth discoloration) or aesthetic effects (such as taste, odor.or color) in drinking water Individual states may choose to adopt them as enforceable standards. Action levels: Are defined in treatment techniques which are required processes intended to reduce the level of a contaminant in drinking water. mg/L (ppm): Unless otherwise indicated, results and standards are expressed as an amount in milligrams per liter or parts per million. Minimum Detection The lowest level that the laboratory can detect a contaminant. Level (MDL): ND: The contaminant was not detected above the minimum detection level NA: The contaminant was not analyzed. ~ The contaminant was not detected in the sample above the minimum detection level. e The contaminant was detected at or above the minimum detection level, but not above the referenced standard . 6,. The contaminant was detected above the standard, which is not an EPA enforceable MCL + The contaminant was detected above the EPA enforceable MCL )C These results may be invalid. Status Contaminant Results Units National Standards Min. Detection Level Inorganic Analytes -Metals e Uranium 0.004 mg/L 0 .030 EPA Primary 0.001 Radiologicals --Gross Alpha 6.02 pCi/l 15 EPA Primary 3.00 ~ Gross Beta ND pCi/L 4.00 We certify that the analyses performed for this report are accurate, and that the laboratory tests were conducted by methods approved by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency or variations of these EPA methods. These test results are intended to be used for infonnstional purposes only and mey not be used for regulatory compliance. National Testing Laboratories, Ltd. NATIONAL TESTING LABORATORIES, LTD Page 2 of 2 31161201511 :21 :44 AM Product· Rads Basic Sample. 652184 These results may be invalid. Ordered By: Resource Engineering 909 Colorado Avenue Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 ATTN: Ryan McBride Client: This informational water quality report compares the actual test result to national standards as defined in the EPA's Primary and Secondary Drinking Water Regulations. Informational Water Quality Report Sample Number: Collection Date and Time: Received Date and Time: Date Completed: 852179 3/3/2015 14:45 3/5/2015 08:55 3/17/2015 Well Water Definition and Legend The contaminant was not detected in the sample above the minimum detection level. The contaminant was detected at or above the minimum detection level, but not above the referenced standard. The contaminant was detected above the standard, which is not an EPA enforceable MCL. The contaminant was detected above the EPA enforceable MCL. mg/L (ppm): The lowest level that the laboratory can detect a contaminant. ND:The contaminant was not detected above the minimum detection level. Minimum Detection Level (MDL): Unless otherwise indicated, results and standards are expressed as an amount in milligrams per liter or parts per million. Fed-Ex Existing Well, 1325-17.1Location: Type of Water: Iron Bacteria Primary Standards:Are expressed as the maximum contaminant level (MCL) which is the highest level of contaminant that is allowed in drinking water. MCLs are enforceable standards. Secondary standards:Are non-enforceable guidelines regulating contaminants that may cause cosmetic effects (such as skin or tooth discoloration) or aesthetic effects (such as taste, odor,or color) in drinking water. Individual states may choose to adopt them as enforceable standards. Action levels:Are defined in treatment techniques which are required processes intended to reduce the level of a contaminant in drinking water. 6571 Wilson Mills Rd Cleveland, Ohio 44143 1-800-458-3330 NA:The contaminant was not analyzed. Microbiologicals Iron Related Bacteria is ABSENT in this Sample.Iron Bacteria by P/A We certify that the analyses performed for this report are accurate, and that the laboratory tests were conducted by methods approved by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency or variations of these EPA methods. These test results are intended to be used for informational purposes only and may not be used for regulatory compliance. National Testing Laboratories, Ltd. NATIONAL TESTING LABORATORIES, LTD Status Contaminant Results Units National Standards Min. Detection Level Page 2 of 2 Sample: 852179Product: Iron Bacteria3/17/2015 4:12:38 PM EASTBANK MAJOR DEVELOPMENT EASTBANK SUBDIVISION COUNTY OF GARFIELD, STATE OF COLORADO PARCEL ID: 218535304001 SHEET INDEX SHEET NUMBER co C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8 C9 A1 A2 LS UNCC CALL BEFORE 'You DIG 1-800-922-1987 Utility Notification Center of Colorado Mrin"11d>'t Olllw 303-2»-1QCl1 12000 W. CollllxMe., SUte B-310 Lilk&waod, Co 1111215 .Q!!,!.2-llUSINESS DAYS IN ADVANCE BEFORE YOU DIG. GRADE, OR EXCAVATE FOR THE MARKING OF UNDERGROUND MEMBER UJIUTIES. TITLE 111LE SHEET S1TE PLAN GRADING, DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN DRIVEWAY PLAN AND PROFILE MAS I ER UTILITY PLAN WAlER TANK DETAIL SHEET PUMP HOUSE DETAIL SHEET GENERAL DETAIL SHEET GENERAL DETAIL SHEET ONSllE WASIEWAlER svs-1E-M ARCHI I EC I URAL ELEVATIONS ARCHI I ECTURAL FLOOR PLAN LANDSCAPING PLAN ( ' I OWNER/LIASON: EASTBANK, LLC C/0 ROBERT MACGREGOR 710 EAST DURANT AVE W-6 ASPEN, CO 81611 PROJECT LIASON KEVIN KIERNAN -KW GLENWOOD SPRINGS, LLC P.O. BOX979 TELLURIDE, CO 81435 II VICINfTY MAP I SCltl.E: ,. -1CCO' 0 ENGINEER= HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING. INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS AND SURVEYORS 1517 BLAKE AVENUE, STE 101 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81601 (970) 945-8676 1. All. ITEMS SHO-.i ON lHE PLANS AS EXISTING ARE SHOW\! IN APPRO>OMATE LOCATIONS ONLY. lHE AClUAL LOCATIONS MAY VARY FROM lliE PL.ANS, ESPECIALLY IN lliE CASE Of UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. CONlRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO PERFORM UTILITY LOCATES BEFORE START OF CONSTRUCTION. v.tlENEVER CONlRACTOR DISCOVERS A DISCREPANCY IN LOCATIONS, HE SHALL CONTACT lHE ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY. 2. lliE COUNTY ENGINEER AND OlliER APPROVING AGENCIES ARE TO BE NOTIFIED AT LEAST "8 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 3. lliE CONlRACTCR SHAU. OBTAIN, AT lliEIR EXPENSE, AU. PERMllS lHAT ARE NECESSARY TO PERFORM lliE PROPOSED WORK. 4. lliE DRAINAGE SlUDY AND OWIS DESIGN WERE PREPARED Willi lHE BENEFIT OF GEOTECHNICAL PERCCLATION AND BORE HOU: lES1S COMPLETED BY HP GEOTECH ON FEBRUARY 27, 2015, PRo.ECT NUMBER 115 023A. 5. lliE ENTIRE SITE IS LOCATED WllHIN FEMA MAP NUMBER 08002051465. ...... AB"l7!" .... 1. ALL DEMO'D STRUCTURES, CONCRETE, TREES (DESIGNATED lliROUGH CITY FORESlRY PERMIT PROCESS), BRUSH AND RUBBISH SHAU. BE REMO~D AND ACCEPTABLY DISPOSED OF. 2. ALL ORGANIC MATTER SHALL BE REMOVED FROM FILI. AREAS. 3. All. FILI. AREAS SHAU. BE COMPACTED IN ACCORDANCE Willi lliE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER'S RE COMMENDATIONS. 4. All. SLOPES SIEEPER lliAN 3:1 SHAU. BE TREATED Willi SEED AND MULCH AND EROSION CONlROL BLANKET NORlH AMERICAN GREEN SC150 OR EQUIVAl..DIT. 5. EROSION CONTROL BALES OR SILT FENCE SHAU. BE PLACED AT lliE TOE AND DRAINAGE OUlFAU. POINTS OF ALL SLOPES 2:1 OR STEEPER TO PRMNT SILTATION ON STREETS, WAl..J<WAYS OR Au.EYS. REFER TO GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN FOR DETAIL AND LOCATION OF EROSION CONlROL MEASURES. 6. CONlRACTOR SHAU. COMPLY WllH AU. LOCAL. COUNTY AND STATE REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO GRADING. DUST AND EROSION. 7. NAlURAL VEGETATION SHAU. BE RETAINED AND PROTECTED \WiEREVER POSSIBLE. EXPOSURE OF SOIL TO EROSION BY REMOVAL OR DIST\JRBANCE OF VEGETATION SHALL BE LIMITED TO lliE AREA REQUIRED FOR IMMEDIATE CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS AND FOR lliE SHORTEST PRACTICAL PERIOD OF TIME. 8. All. DISlURBED AREAS SHALL RE-SEEDED, MULCHED OR SODDED AS PER GARFIELD COUNTY CRITERIA AND APPROVED LANDSCAPING PLANS. 9. TOPSOIL SHAU. BE STOO<PILED TO lliE EXTENT PRACTICABLE ON lliE SllE FOR USE ON AREAS TO BE REVEGETATED. ANY AND ALL STOa<PILES SHALL BE LOCATED AND PROTECTED FROM EROSIVE ELEMENTS, INCLUDING EROSION CONlROL AROUND lHE PERIMETER Of SAID STOCKPILES. 10. AT AU. TIMES, lliE PROPERTY SHAU. BE MAINTAINED AND/OR WATERED TO PREVENT WIND-CAUSED EROSION. EARlliWORK OPERATIONS SHALL BE DISCONTINUED WHEN FUGITIVE DUST SIGNIFICANTI.Y IMPACTS ADJACENT PROPERTY. IF EARlHWORK IS COMPLETE OR DISCONTINUED AND DUST FROM lHE SITE CONTINUES TO CREATE PROBLEMS, lHE OWNER/DEVELOPER SHALL IMMEDIATELY INS'111UTE MITIGATIVE MEASURES AND SHALL CORRECT DAMAGE TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES. 11. MAINTAIN POSITIVE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM S'IRUCTURES AT AU. TIMES AS SPECIFIED BY lHE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. ENar.EER's CERllFICATKlN PREPARED UNDER MY SUPERVISION ROCER D NEAL. P.E. C-OLORADO NO. FOR AND ON BEHALF Of HIGH COUNlRY ENGINEERING, INC. / / / / '- \ / \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' PROPOSEO FIRE HYCRANT ' TEMPORARY_/'\.\. CONSTRUCTION \. EASEMENT \. ' ' ' PROPOSEO OWTS LAYOUT (SEE SHEET C9 FOR DETAILS) ' ' PROPOSED CONCRETE CATCH CURB TYP. ' ' ' ' ' SEE SHEET C7 ' ' ' ' ' ' ', R2' ' .............................. ...... __ --------- 'N ., -"' ---- LOT 3 ,---- \ \ \ R20'-__, .; PROPOSED FIRE HYCRANT \ \ PROPOSEO L----:/:\ VERTICAL CONCRETE CURB SEE SHEET C7 \11_0' ACCESS &: UTILITY \ ASEMENT FOR LOT 1 - ,5• THICK 40 v o ~ PSI CONCRETE PAD FOR GATE R10::z GA TE EN'""TR""Y-c--i 1ACCESS PEDESTAL ---x---x---X---x---x---.... )(. \ LOT 3 LOT ACCESS EASEMENT TEMPORARY."\ CONSlRUCTION EASEMENT _. _. ---------:;:o --~ \ \ LOT 2 - LEGEND 11 I I I I NOTES PROPOSED BUILCING PROPOSED PAVEMENT EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING PROPERTY BOUNDARY EXISTING EDGE OF ROAD PROPOSED STRIPING PROPOSED FENCE PROPOSED ROOF DRAIN 1. EXISTING INFORMATION PROVIOEO BY AERIAL MAP ANO HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATION OF THE EXISTING UTILITIES FOR TIE IN LOCATIONS ANO OEPTH. IF CONSTRUCTION ISSUES ARISE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER. 3. SEE LANDSCAPING PLAN FOR PROPOSEO LANDSCAPING. 0 ,. I I ~ REMOVE AND REPLACE 6156 SF GRAVEL DRIVE GRAPHIC SCALE 30 .. 120 I I ----1 ( IN FEET ) I inch ~ 30 ft. C'Q ~ 110 ~ ~'\. >-ca z 0 Ui ~ d z • 0 z - 0 u u . -1 >- -1 z -~ ~o <( u ro D Iii -1 <( !!:! wl.l... 0:: <( (.9 10 --6 d. -CJ) r.b ~ 5 " ii: .... z 1LI :E IL 9 1LI Gi z c ~ a:: ll. 0 < Ill .... :E -en ~ z D'i ~ PROJECT NO. 2151005.00 SP.1 C1 \ \""' \ --- 8° DRAIN PIPE FROM IRRIGATION DITCH TO BE RELOCATED TO MATCH PROPOSED DRAINAGE SWALE AROUND SEPTIC FIEl.D \ " \ \ "' CLEAN OUT INV.=5947.75' ~ ~ ""' 24°-NYOPL.A~ INLINE DRAIN"""" GRATE: 5947.40 ~ INV OUT: 5944.40 VAU.EY INLE 15"X26" V PAN GRATE (;~~TE: 59 .62 )NV 0~.42.62 LEGEND 11 I I I I ---5950--- ---5949--- --------- NOTES PROPOSED BUILDING PROPOSED PAVEMENT EXIS'TlNG BUILDING EXIS'TlNG MAJOR CONTOUR EXIS'TlNG MINOR CONTOUR PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOUR PROPOSED MINOR CONTOUR PROPOSED SEDIMENT CONTROL FENCE PROPOSED VEHICLE TRACKING CONTROL STRAW WADDLE ALONG DRAINAGE SWALE 1. EXISTING INFORMATION PROVIDED BY AERIAL MAP AND HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC. 2. ELEVATION: 5900.00' -00.00' ABBREVIATIONS ME: MATCH EXISTING FF: FINISHED FLOOR FG: FINISHED GRADE Fl: FLOW LINE TC: TOP OF CURB EC: EDGE OF CONCRETE EP: EDGE OF PAVEMENT LP: LOW POINT HP: HIGH POINT CC: CURB CUT LOCATION GRAPHIC SCALE ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ = I ~-1-1--1----1 ( IN Jl'EET ) 1 inch = 30 ft. z 0 Ui ~ []'. 0 z 10 -0 -N cl: w Cl z :i ~ .., !'.i " ii: PROJECT NO. ' .. :.,... .. ' \ \ \ \ \ ""' --I ~' \'§) \ ;\ \ '\. I • ' 0 • • ••• --"' ..., "' ~ a:i ~ "' ..., ;;; II II > t:; ci > > n. n. A -1.99% 0 "' "' . "' CD • ... O> "' .... "' :1l \ \ ... ... "' ... "' d 0 "' ± Ill "' ~ II < " tn J > 5 n. I'- A • •ell: "' "' .... CD • .,,.o "'"' ., l1l 3+00 \ \ \ \ I I ~ 0-~ \ ' -0 "' "' ~ + "' "' "' ~ ,;,; u ... - -"' •o ~..: O>., "' l1l ·~ I I I \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 1 I I I \ \ \ \ \ 1 I I I I PLAN VIEW PVI STA -1+80 PVI ELEV -5952.18 A.D. -3.42 K -46.81 160.00' ·-' "' 0 r; 0 "' + "' -O> "' cii ~ ,;,; ~ '" m (ROPOSED GRADE -5. -1-----e-\ - "' "' . "' o· "'"' "'"' "' :1l 2+00 PROFILE VIEW HORZ. SCALE: 1 • = 30' VERT. SCALE: 1" = 10' ~XISllNG GRADE "' "' ... "' • O> C<ri""': iii I") "'"' CD"' "'., ., l1l "' l1l 1+00 -- PVI STA = o+57 PVI ELEV = 5958.33 A.D. = -2.00 K = 15.00 ',__30.00' VO-' "' "' ~ ... a:i ... "' 6 ... ,.: "' + ... "' "' 0 ... "' ~ cii ,;,; ~ ~ ~ m m ... ... A ---------- "' ... . "' "' . "'"' "'"' "' :1l ... -+ 0 II ;:, "' > n. ---- "' "! CD "' CD "' II > ~ ... > n. A.,1 ~· 5960 ... .,; "' CD "' 5940 DATUJI ELEY 5986.00 o+oo LEGEND I PROPOSED BUILDING I PROPOSED PAVEMENT 11 I I I I EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING PROPERTY BOUNDARY - --7550-- -EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR - - - - - -· EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR - - - - - - - -EXISTING EDGE OF ROAD ---7550 PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOUR PROPOSED MINOR CONTOUR NOTES 1. EXISTING INFORMATION PROVIDED BY AERIAL MAP AND HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC. 2. CONTRACTOR SHAil. FJELD VERIFY THE LOCATION OF THE EXISTING UTILITIES FOR TIE IN LOCATIONS AND DEPTH. IF CONSTRUCTION ISSUES ARISE, THE CONTRACTOR SHAil. NOTIFY THE ENGINEER. GRAPHIC SCALE w ~ ~ ~ -----1 1--1---1 ( IN FEE'!' ) 1 inch = 20 ft. >-ca z 0 Ui ~ d z • 0 z - PROJECT NO. 2151005.00 PP·1 C3 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ' ' PROPOSED <fJ DRYWELL ' ' ' ' ' \ \ \ \ '\ '\ \ '\ '\ '\ '\ '\ '\ '\ '\ '\ '\ INSPECTION WEUL (TIP.) INFll TRATOR UNITS (TIP.) 101 LF e• .:. CL-52 DIP '\ '\ '\ \ / \ \ \ '\ ' / ' ' )<, / PROPOSED DRYWELL / ' ' ' ' ' ' ' PROPOSED FlRELINE SERVICE \.. • • I ...................... " .... .... . :. .... PROPOSED SANITARY • SEWER SERVICE PROPOSED 364 LF UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC • PROPOSED 532 L.F CABLE TV SERVICE ,---- ~ PROPOSED DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE • • • • • • • • • • • EXISTING WELL FUTURE WEUL .... <=---.... .. .... <--- PROPOSED ELECTRIC POLE -----.· ... \. :·.· ... ~· :, ----< ··' . .!.'""~ .. :~ ----. . ..... ,.,._ -< LEGEND I PROPOSED BUILDING I PROPOSED PAVEMENT 11 I I I I EXISTING BUILDING -0-ELECTRIC POLE EXISTING PROPERTY BOUNDARY OE OE OE EXISTING OVERHEAD ELECTRIC w w w PROPOSED WATER SERVICE • • PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER SERVICE II II II PROPOSED UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC T T T PROPOSED TELEPHONE SERVICE cm· • 011' • 011' • PROPOSED CABLE TV SERVICE • • • PROPOSED OVERHEAD ELECTRIC NOTES 1. EXISTING INFORMATION PROVIDED BY AERIAL MAP AND HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC. 2. CONTRACffiR SHALL FJELD VERIFY lliE LOCATION OF THE EXISTING UTILITIES FOR TIE IN LOCATIONS AND DEPlli. IF CONSTRUCTION ISSUES ARISE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY lliE ENGINEER. ' GRAPHIC SCALE ( IN J'IJET ) 1 Inch = 30 ft. '•~.[' "'-- ' ' f I ISilNG """ ELECTRIC POLE """ ' >-ca z 0 Ui ~ d z ~3 ..J ~..J D 0:: ~ D • 0 z - ~ I u 0 u u . -1~ -1 z . :i ~o <i u ro D Iii -1 <i !!:! wl.l... 0:: <i (.9 ~ D .... z 1LI :E IL 9 1LI Gi c a:: 0 < :E ~ z D'i ~ 10 --6 :i -:2' r.b 5 ii: z ~ a. i1:: -.J -... ::J a: Ill ... ~ ~ PROJECT NO. 2151005.00 MU·1 C4 o· 270• 90• 180' 12 ~ 2,--- a, ' " 'f' .. ru J... I I I I 112· x 8 112· HX HD BOLT I Ii 1/2" DIA FLAT IJASHER-7"i1'1ff'!'( 1/2' DIA FLAT 'WASHER DB L 1/2' HX NUTS o· ' I I I I I ' I ' I I I I I I I o· 3.0' TANK BOTIOM TANK OUTSIDE WALL .j__! __ F:_----ALLOW 1• EXPANSION GAP BETWEEN PIPE ENOS INSIDE COUPLING · ...... ...... . · ..... lHRUST BLOCK TYPICAL TANK/PIPE CONNECTION ' FOR OVERFLOW AND DRAIN N. T.S. 24 I I SPCS 13 @ GUARDRA I L EACH SIDE OF LADDE R 12 = .,., ,-- -- / I ..... ;:;!; 0.1046PL GR40 1 R.V, 0.1345PL GR40 1 R.V . 0.1345PL GR40 1 R.V. I 0.1875PL GR36 I I 2 R,V • Ii 0.1875PL GR36 I I 2 R,V . 38:'-7 7/16' TANK DIAMETER El EVATJON lfilll USE 1/2' PC FN BOLTS W'/rLAT WASHERS & HEX NUTS --, ----i I Ii USE 1/2' PC FN BOLTS \I/FLAT W'ASHERS & HEX NU TS 10' RFSO FLANGE NDZL. o· ~VALL PANEL SEAM (13 ~--ir"'"T-t""T-.t.:-_ 12GA. DECK 100· Pl AN VIE'J TANK INTERIOR 10' PIPE USE 1/ 2' BOLTS VASHm & HEX NUT TYP> USE 112' X 1 112' H:X HD BCJL TS IJ /DBL F LAT IJASHERS &. DBL HEX NUTS STRIP GSKT REC'D 'I USE 112• PC F~N::::'.~"--------Et BDL TS IJ/FLAT IJASHERS TANK a. HEX NUTS INTERIOR USE 1/2' X 1 1/2' HX HD BDL TS IJ/FLAT W'ASHERS & HEX NUTS FLANGE GASKET USE 1/2" PC FN BOLTS IJ/FLAT IJASHERS A. HEX NUTS 24' RDpf HATCH DETAii ITEM ttl 4 I PLEASE FURNISH HE~\ TER INFO (i3) 20' HAtJ;;fAY /VENT IJ /BIRD SCREEN 1....TANK INTERIOR 20' CENTER DOME \{/MAN'JAY ~ QfTAII I TEM 11? L 13 EAVE LINE CUSTOMER ITEM ITEM 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 ACCESSOR Y ORIENTATION CHART SIERVJCE SIZE SHELL MAN\IAY -BOLT ON SHELL MANIJAY/NAHEPLATE 24' SUCTI~ -ISO# RrSO FLANGE OOZZLE 6' PRDJ CS 10" INLET -150# RFSD FLANGE NOZZLE 6' PROJ CS 4• DRAIN -150# RFSD FLANGE NOZZLE 6' PROJ CS 2• RETLRN -1501 RFSO l~LAN:jE NOZZLE 6' PROJ CS 10' HEATER -1501 RFSO l~LANGE NOZZLE 6' PROJ CS 6' OVERF LO\t' -15Dil Rf'SO FLANGE NOZZLE 6" PRDJ CS 6' FLUSH CL.EANDUT 2 R.V, 24" x 46' EXTERIOR CAGED LADDER STD. INTERIOR LADD ER IJ /SAFETY CLIMB STD. TIC LaGa STD . CENTER DOME 20· REF DEGREE FL F~ADIUS TANK SHELL TAl~K SHELL TANK SHELL TAl~K SHEL L TAl~K SHEL L TANK SHELL TAt~K SHEL L TA!~K SHELL TAl~K SHELL CENTER CENTER HANW'AY /VENIT \I/BIRD SCREEN 20' CENTER CENTER RD[IF HATCH LIQUID LE :VEL INDICATOR PARTIAL GUARDRAIL -ID' EA SIDE OF LADDER HEA TE R SUPPORT STAND 24'S(;I. STD STD STD STD CUSTOMER IS TD NOTE APPROVED ON ACCESS[JRY LOCATION DR TD MARK UP DRAIJING INDICAT I NG DEGREE &. ELEVA TIO N OF ALL SIDEIJALL ACCESSORIES AND DEGREE LOCAT ION OF ROOF ACCESSORIES. ALSO SPECIFY TANK COL.DR. USE STRIP GASKET AROUND FLUSH CLEANDUT~ USE 1/2' PC FN ~\. BOLTS \rrl/FLAT W'ASHERS &. HEX NUT S ' , -,-, I BTH . OF CLEANofr I l I --I ' ~ I ' " .. / I .. ' "" ' ~ u"' I -" " ID .... "' -!__( ::-,. ' "' • w ru "' ,_ -... '--,/ 24' ELEV. FROM BTM. OF TANK STEEL TD CTR OF ACCESSORY UNLESS NOTED OTHERVISE ' ~ 3'-0' 2'-5" SEE DETAIL SEE DETAIL CTR. IN TOP PANEL \ I DECK DECK DECK DECK DECK FLOOR :,, .... fl l !SH CI EAN-01 JI DETAii llE.I'AII ITEM #8 SAEnytnpERATIDr~AI NOTfS1 1. TANK IS DESIGNED FDR LOADS INDLCED FROM A LIQUID PRODUCT. 2. DD NOT FIELD CUT ANY OPENINGS IN TANK \IJTH[)JT IJRJTTEN C:DNSENT FROM TANK caNNECTJ(]ll, NAMEPLATE w sc:H.40 PIPE 150# R.F.S.O. FLANGE ,r-NOZZLE USE 1/2' PC FN BOLT \rrl/FLAT IJSHR & HEX NUT 3. CUSTCH:R IS RESPl::t6IlLE FtR PROVIDING PRil'ER l!RACIN:l CF THDR EQUIPMENT ATTACHING TD ~y PART DF THE SIL.a. 4. TANK FIDUNDATJDNS SHALL BE LEVEL \llTHIN l/8' IN ANY 30 FT. CIRC UMFERENCE UNDER THE TANK SHELL. LEVELNIESS ON CIRCUMFERENCE SHALL NCI VARY MORE THAN 1/'4" FRO M AN ESTABLISHED PLANE . TANK PADDIN(; TD BE USED ON CDNCRE TE FOUNDATIONS. VAPOR BARR ~IE R TD BE USED ON GRAVE L AND SAND FOUNDATIONS. BOI T [ti SHEii MAN)JAY 24~ I.D. ? R.y ITEM ti] I ~ Ii 210· ' I I I I I ' I ' I I I I I I I 2Jo· MATERIAL SCHEDULE FOR TANK/PIPE CONNECTION ' BELOW FITTINGS ARE SHOWN FOR 6" I I 11-IERE IS ALSO AN B" AND 12" CONNECTION Will-I TI-IE SAME FITTINGS FOR 12" PIPE. FlTTING CONNECTION SIZE 0 L:F. 6.o• O.O. STEEL PIPE 0.432• WALL. CEMENT LINED [!] STILE DRESSER COUPLING 6.o" x 6.o" @] 6" 0.1.P. @] s• M.J. -P.E. 90' BEND [I] 6" M.J, 0.1.P. . "' I I 10• ANTI-YQRTEX NQZZI E ITEM I? @l 100· \ I I 100· [!AT I AYQllT EXTERIOR VIEW SCH, 10 PIPE 3 4 5 TDIP or FLOOR 5. IF ANCHOR B[J_TS ARE NOT PROVIDED BY TANK CONNECTION, ANCHORING FDR ALL VIND AND SEISMIC LOADS IS THE RESPl>ISIBILITY or CUSTOMER. 6. APPLIC~\TION DF' L[]ADS TO TANK rR[]H E:QUIPMENT , OTHER THAN N[]TED ON THIS DRA\llNG, HUST BE: I I USE 1/2' PC FN BDL TS 'W/FLAT W'ASHERS a. HEX NUTS I I 6. >-... ~ .. Ri;-o;:n i;-1 ANril;-NOZZ! f ITEM #3. 4 5 L 6 90• ' I I I I I ' I ' I I I I Ii I I 9Q• I I USE 1/2' f>C FN BOLT 'w'/FLAT IJSHR &. HEX NUT TYP . AT EACH HDRZ. SEAM PIPE SUPP T BRACKET AT EACH H[IRZ SEAM TYPICAL 1•-0· TYP __ BTM. OF BASE ANGLE APPRDV 'ED IN \IRJ!JNG BY TANK CONNECTION PRJCR TD INSTALL ,ATION . 7. TANK IS DESIGNED FOR ATMOSPHERIC CE:QUALIZED> PRESSURE INTERNALLY AND EXTE:RNALLY. CUSTl>'IER TD ASSURE PROPER VENTJLATJCN IS PROVIDED AND MAINTA I NED. INSTALLATI[]N NQITh 1. USE DN ILY HARDWARE FURNISHED 'WITH TANK. ALL BOLTS MUST MEET SPECIAL HIGH STRENGTH REQUIREMENTS. 2. INSTALL. TANK SEGMENTS IN A CDUNTER-CLaCKIJISE DIRECTION IJHEN \/~KING FR OM TOP Da\IN. INSTA LL TANK SIEGMENTS IN A CLDCKW'ISE DIRECTIDN 'WHEN IJORKING fR[JM BDTT[Jol UP. 3. TANK SIHA LL BE ADEQUATELY BRACED DURING ERECTION TD PRE:l{ENT IJIND DAMAGE. 4, W'HEN E:t«:APSULATED BDL TS ARE REQUIRED, THEY \/ILL BE UTIL .lZED IN THE STDRED LIQUID ZONE ONLY . 5. INSTALLATION CONTRACTOR SHALL CDDRDINATE !OOCl1-UP CDATlNG PROCEDURES. CONTRACTOR TD FOLLOW MANUfA ICTURER'S LABEL INSTRUCTIONS . 6 . ADEQUA 'TE: BLOCKING stiDULD BE USED TD PROTECT BOLTED PAN .ELS IF RE:MDVED FROM SHIPPING PALLETS PRIOR 1ra FIELD INSTALLATION. DESIGN CRITERI/11 1. TANK DIESIGN PER NFPA 22-03, LATES T EDITION . 2. DECK IS DESIGNED FDR 25 PSF ROOF LIVE LOAD . 3. TANK DIESIGNED TD WITHSTAND \/IND LOADS PER A'IJ'IJA D103-0'il, 90 MPH, EXP . C, 1=1.1'5 4. TANK IESI!i£D rn 'JITHSTAND SEISMIC L.DAns PER AWA m03-D9, SS=44.7~. S1=14)'., USE lillll.P=3, SITE CLASS D (1=15) USE 112• X 1 114" 5. TANK DIE.SIGNED TD IJITHSTAND 2 DZ PER SQUARE: INCH PDSI!lV'E AIR PRESSURE AND .5 DZ PER SQUARE INCH DF NEGATIVE AIR PRESSURE . HX HD BDL T '¥//FLAT IJASHER L HEX NU T 6, 7. OPERA TING PRESSURE ClF TANK JS ATMOSPHERIC. TANK IS DESIGNED FDR STORAGE OF LIQUID IJITH A SPECIFIC CiiRAVlTY DF 1.0. LIQUID PH RANGE BETWEEN 4 -9, •• 9. 10 . IL 12. 13 . DPERAT :!NG TEHPERATLRE IS AMBIENT. TANK CoAPACITY JS 202,000 GALLONS DF IJDRKING CAPACITY BASED ON 18' CF FREEBDARD , ALL BOTTOM, RIEF SHEET AND SHELL BDL TS ARE GRADE 8 (150 KSI >. TOTAL TANK IJEIGHT EMPTY IS APPROXIMATELY 41,3001 WITH 5l~ ADDED . TANK CIDNSTRUCTED OF ASTM CERTIFIED SHEET, PLATE AND STRUCTURAL MEMBERS. BLOCKI NG CBY OTHERS> TANK CPATINGSt 6" pyERfLQlw' ITEM #7 INTERIDR PRIMER• LIQ FUSION 7000 F'BE 7 MILS MINIMUM DFT RANGE DF 7 MILS MIN I 10 MILS MAX EXTERIOR PRIMER1 EXT FUSION SOOD FBE 3 MILS MINIMUM DF'T RANGE Of 3: MILS MIN I 5 MILS MAX EXTERIOR TDPCDA"r1 EXT FUSlDN SDP 3 MILS MINIMUM DF'T RANGE: DF 3 MILS MIN I 5 MILS MAX EXTERIOR CDLCR• ~-!!·~'i:!""'!!!'l!ll'/!'r; PANEL L ACCESSORY SEAM SEALANT-TS-PLUS GRAY EDGE SEALANT CDLDR1 EXTERIDR-TBD NOTE• ALL COAT I NGS ARE APPLIED OVER AN SP10 SURFACE PRE:P AND BAl<IED DN GASKET MATERIAL IS EPDM SYNTHETIC RUBBER, -.-~.-.11<. ClilNNECTllili'I B • NO . REV BY DATE REVISION •••••••••••••••••••••••••••• CUSTOMER AFFILIATE llRCIUP APPROVAL aeae Ncnrnt I ent .,. , PAIWaN•, KANmAll e7a57 e•o.4aa.ao10 . rAX: e.ao .4aa.aeee PROJEC T NAIE AND LOCA TiaN FlED -X FREIGHT WAlER TANK SlEEL 2·<-t----1 IY ~ POSstSSlON CF THlS OOCUI€~, R£ClPJENT AGRE£$ TWIT ' lTS IDITDrn: ME CChnIDITio\I., PR!PRIETARY TlWE SECREH CF Tl£ ToiV« CD.CTJCk ICI PIRTI!Jl IF THIS IOCtMENT MY IE REPRmlUCED. DISTRDUTED , !:It lJSED DI "NY ~MER VITIOJT \lllITTTDI PCRMlSSJ[)I not TI£ TANC CINIECTICll. D~G TITLE MAIN ASSEMBLY DETAILS 38'-7 7116' I.D. X 24'-6 519• HT. TANK DIJN BY IlM 7/28/1~ CHk BY JaB Na 01&99 DWG ND BCL0380241699001 NATIVE COMPAClED MAlERIAL ~1-----fllLTRATION MAlERIAL PERFORA 1ED 4• PVC PIPE·--- (1 ROW OF PERFORATIONS MUST BJ; ~LONG lHE FLOl\UNE OF lHE PIPE) WRAPPED 'MlH MIRIFl FlLlER FABRIC---3/4" GRAVEL 12•x12• CROSSSECTlON PERIMETER DRAIN CROSS SECTION DETAIL N.T.S. z 0 iii ~ a: ci z • u z - ci u u , .J /'.: .J z . :J ~o <( u ID D ~ Lil wLL ~ PROJECT NO. 2151005.00 DET·I cs EF12 84'' AFF 2 '-E" - NOTE: ALL FITTINGS & VALVES GREATER THAN 2" SHALL BE CLASS 52 DIP. ALL 2" OR LESS SHALL BE SCH-80 PVC. ~· CHLORINE INJECTION LINE TAP 2" MAKE-UP WATER TO TIE INTO 1 o· SUCTION LINE / FIRE CONTROLLER l6" HU DRAIN I I I I I I FXFLBAF120 BAFFLE TANK PRESSURE TANK PRESSURE TRANSDUCER \ 2" PIPE FROM WELL 4" PIPE TO DOMESTIC WATER SYSTEM WELL PUMP CONTROLLER CHECK VALVE 1 ~· LINE TO FIRE PUMP N 0. TO STORAGE TANK ¥~..£~~F'-if!- 1 O" SUCTION LINE 2· SAMPLE TAP SWING CHECK VALVE (TYP) TWO-WAY CONTROL VALVE ....L---E~ DOMESTIC WATIER N.C. • N PRESSURE TANK ISOLATION VALVE ;!" CHLORIN 2~ I-2" INJECTION LINE TAP PURCOR PRESSURE TRANSDUCER PRESSURE GAGE SAMPLE TAP ® POSITIVE DISPLACEMENT CHLORINE INJECTOR PUMPS 8 (2) ON SHELF ABOVE SOLUTION TANK (STENNER 45 SERIES) ® 30 GALLON CHLORINE SOLUTION TANK (STENNER STS SERIES) ~ --"-AR E-t!NE-EUH5 T ___ ___,,TO, SITE -f----- g INSIDE SECONDARY CONTAINMENT TANK ON FLOOR BELOW SHELF ~'--.-;-----.·1- , ' ' ' ' ·. _· . E ~EC ICAL PANELS / 2 '-6 " / / 1 ~· WA TIER LINE TO C 1 OL ENGINE, TIE TO 2" WL BELOW GRADE INSI E PUMP HOUSE W/ VALVE TALCO DIESEL PUMP TO WELL 100 PSl/2500 GPM PUMP HOUSE PLUMBING PLAN SCALE: 1/4 I 1'·0" N.T.S. • 0 I ~ IEAD T " 0 0 i 0 ,., - 0 1 .. 149" Jockey Pump TALCO DIESEL PUMP-100 PSI /2500 GPM N.T.S. 20·-o· • DOWN[\ SPOUT-~ PRE-FINISHED METAL 3/4' FIRE RETARDANT'-~ WALL PANELS ON 7 /B"x20 GA. GALV. HAT CHANNELS AT 4'-0" O.C. VERT . t.lAX. ON 3 5/8" METAL STUDS AT 1'-4" O.C. WITH R19 FOIL FACED THERMAL INSULATION. 0 PUMP HOUSE I PH1 I o~ ()o ' . ' ' . . : . . ' . ·. .. ~. . . ' " ... ' .. " .... .. ' '! ' "' ' ' . . . \ . ·.·. .. . ~ . ' TREATED T & G PLYWOOD LINER PANELS FULL HEIGHT ALL WALLS. PAINT. .... "' . . ,--------- ' I I I I I I I I L ________ _ ' ' . . ; . . ' ' ' .. ' " .. ; (PH2l·-, · · · . • · 8· 0 o· · I .· " , :;.,C ,. ' ' ·· .. ' b . ·. . . I .• . " ' ' ' ' . . . . . . . . ' ' N. " ' " . ' ... ... " • "' I io • 0 I " '° CONCRETE PPROACH--t:t /'i'.$' ~-'.:RSa:J3,:C[g~tQm~~:U:l~-'--'--1--~--1 SLAB SEE ITE DRAWINGS. ~CRUSHED ROCK / DRIVE -------'-"-"-~-\~~- 4'-0" 12·-o· D.O. PLAN 1/4" = 1'-0" N.T.S. 4'-0" s·-o· a: UI z ~ QQ i" UI !;;;~ co 0 ll Cl 0 -o ~ IL J -§o t\i::. zU Nz SIL Cl -0 • 0 a: 0 0 -~ 0:;; ':; CD o J • ' ;;!"' -., ll " ll Ill ~ z 0 ~ a: ci z • u z - 0 a: 0 .... z Ill :E D. l'.j u.fil ~a:Of: >Ot!>:J ~ui~§ 1!:~~15 ~.,,:.;., < -UJ~ 0§1=~ :Jl:ia:o wooz z>-u.::i iii"'i"O :JO::<tO:: mO>t!> c\J:LL<(O:: ~wuw "'&l~ :i u 0 u . .J Ill ti .J~ ~~Ill .J z . :i Q 0 :i: ~o 0:: :i: fl) <U 0 a. ..J Ill 0 ~~~ ~~ :E :::> Ill w l1. :i.:: a. c 0:: ~ ~ ~ PROJECT NO. 2151005.00 DET-2 C6 S T R U C T U R E S I Z E 1 2 " N / A S T A N D A R D S O L I D 2 X 2 R & H N / A 1 5 " N / A S T A N D A R D S O L I D 2 X 2 R & H N / A 1 8 " N / A S T A N D A R D S O L I D 2 X 2 R & H 2 X 3 R & H 2 4 " N / A S T A N D A R D S O L I D 2 X 2 R & H 2 X 3 R & H 3 0 " P E D E S T R I A N S T A N D A R D S O L I D 2 X 2 R & H 2 X 3 R & H H - 2 0 G R A T E O P T I O N S ' 0 I "' z "' om ~ i @ "'0 n o: 0: ;'§ ;'§ z z ~ ~ (/] "' ' 0 0 _1 I o "' "' I" 0 L '" w "' "' I N ' 0 I ' 0 I ;,-, I "' ~ .---~OUNDED CONCRETE TOF 11----5" JIAMETER, SCHEDL.LE 40 STE::L PIPE. . ··11'·-'11 · . ,,. I .: . I .; • • II ·11 .. · '! I · 'I ' ·J· 1 •• i1 • • • 1'',A1 • . 1: . ·:t-•• : 11 • 11 . ·· 1 ~· ·11··· 1-· I ~"' • . . 11 • • 11 A : I : •1 • " . ·11 • 11 ~ .• 1: · I ' ' I I . =-1LL WITH COl\C ~ET::. :iAINT: OSHA YELLOVI ~ lf\l~H GH.l\lJl/1'.l\VlMlN I ~.Ji . )~ .. +-----+~14-:.:n · :£ ., ' .. . . . 1 '-5" CIAMETER • ~------·/jt::~..---ROUNDED CONCRETE TOP 0 I :., 2'-0" I 1 11---8" Dlt1METER, NOrJIN/\L, SCHEDULE 4-0 STEEL PIPE. ~ILL WI H CONCHlll. I PAINT: 8SI IA. Yll I cw I I ....---=1NISH GRADE/PAV:::lvlEN- FOOTING DIA~<llETER BOLLARD DETAIL N.T.S. SEC UR:: SIDE FIXED ARM WITH 3 STRANDS OF BARBED WIRE 1 b/tf' OUISllJ=- DIAMITIR TOP RAii LINE POSTS 2 3/8" DJTSIJE DIAlvlE-ER CORNER POSTS -4" OJTSIJE 01/\tvl::-ER. MAX. POST SPACING \l/l_L BE 1 o' -o" ON c ENTER B OTTJM R/\IL CR TENSION \l\11RE CONCRETE FOOTING SEE \JOTES FOR FOOT l\G SIZES TYPIC/\L FOR FENCE AND CATES ' ITT 11 .... -: ilITT " 'I 11 ~ '11 111 ·:·J .1 ,~ I I 'FOOTING SIZES :111 111 11 .~.· 1 ~l .. : ,.,...,. 11 111 11 1. ~iN•E i;~gER x 36" DEcP /. CORl\IR A\Jl TIRlvl NAI POSTS- 1 11 . · 1 I 111 12" DIAtJETER x 42" DEEP -::111-.. : : 1 :· :.11 I 3 · i:_rE01~~~~~R x 4s· DEcP --_l_~LJ -111 4. VE~IFY HEIGHT RESTRICTIONS :.,+-----.,.==! I . _; · '.· W TH LOCAL 1\UTHORITY HAI/ING . I 111 · 111 JURISCIC-101\ ScE NO:] =1- TYPICAL FENCE DETAIL N.T.S. CHAIN _11\1< FAHRlr IN GATE, FURNISHED B"' GATE 4" OUTSlrJF rJIAMFTFR SCHEDULE 40 ros-, TYPIC.1'.L jQ'-4" TYMETAL, TYM-20CO OPFRATOR. --------...... Wfl x .31 OVFRf-FArJ =-J =-AM (OR AS M.llY BE REQUIRED Ew--fie5-ettj---~ ACORN :JOST CAPS, GALVANIZED STCCL DY INSTALLCR, TYPICAL. TRUCK AND HANGER ASSEM3_Y. WB x 3' OVERHEAC BEAM. =-::-ii SPLICE JOINT, AS REQJIRED EY DESIGN. ALL.MIN JM CATE PAl\EL CHAIN _INK F1\BRIC 4" CUTSIDE DI.II.METER SC HEDl~LE 40 ::iosT, TYPICA_.---'\ OVCRI ICAD IRACK . 8 I 5'-0n MIN. 3'-o" EM::RGENCY ACCESS rcocsrmAN SWING CATE BY TYMETAL Sl:.I:. 1\011:. #2 TH S SHEET. EM::RGENCY ACCESS PEDESTRll\N SWING GATE BY TYMETAL SEE l\OTE #2 THIS SHEET REFER TO 8/D-5 MAl\LIFACT~l~IR~E~~~§~~~'~;;;;J 0 ' "' D~IVE CHAl\J ~--G.11.T:: ~t~NLJ=-ACTURER'S CATCH ASSEMBLY. GATE MANUFAC-JRER'S BOTIOM GUIJE. GATE MANUFACTURER'S INTFRMFllATF ROTIOM GlJllF. +· x 3' orCRATOri TAIL ~DTE: T:""Rc-LCCTl\i'[ TRAlllC/V:I llC _ILAR r.11.rc. RCD ANJ WI 1-c. ALTE~NATING, WEATHERl'ROOF. TAPE WILL BE FHWA MUTCD COMPLl1\NT. SHOF /\PPLIED BY TYIVET/\L, BOTH REFL::CTIVE EVIER:;ENCY DISCOl\NECT BOX BY 11\BOUNC AND CUTBOUNC SIDES OF ALL OF THE lf{llJf-IC/\11:.-ilCULAfi IA.JI:_, REFER TO NJTE 1 ---~ -YMETAL. LOCATE ON THE SEC._IRED STll.NDARD 2"x2" \IERTICA_ GATE MEMBERS. SIDE OF THE FENCE/GATE. 2. Tll[ GAT[ CMCRGCNCY JISCONNCC-ICATUR[ Tll[ i----------------"'"'-' --4'-"---------------1;-J'-1 /2" STEEL ::; ONDU -FOR DISCON~ECT C/\BLE, BY GA-:. 11\STA_LER. 1 /2" STEEL ::; DNDU -FDR EVIER::;ENCY DISCOr-.NECT, BY GATE l\JSTALLER. EIVERCE~CY CISCCNNECT BOX. EMERGENCY PEDESTRIAN GATE AND KNOX 30X WILL BE =-uRl\ISHED AND INSTA_LEJ ONLY WH::N SAID TEMS A~E RE::JUIRED BY LOCAL Al, --iORITY H.llV NG JIJRISDIC TION (AH.J) 1. THE MINl\1UM DEPTH FOR THE PEDESTAL FOUND/\TION Sl-1\L_ BE ~'-0" BELOW T--lE FINISHED G'iADE E_EVA-ION, AND SHALL 3 E f11SIGNln IN ACCORrJ.1\1\CI 'NITI I Tl 1-I OCAI SOIL CONDITIONS AND _OCAL CODES. SAID DESIGN SHALL, 'NITHOUT :::xc EPTIO\J, BE RE\ilEVtED BY /\ LOC/1L ENGl\J:::ER. ?. CONIJUIT TO IXIT -DL.l\IJATION 1311 OW IRC"JST LINE. 3. DIMENSIONS DETERMINE) BY FXG. 4. PlrJISTAI ARRANGl\11\JT TO n1 IL.RNISI 11n lY TYMETAL INC. AND INSTALLED BY TYMETAL INC APP~O\IED INSTALLER. SEE \JOTE 4 2'-0" II -----EDGE OF ------ROADWAY PEDESTAL ~OUNlJAll8N------. BASE PLATE 7 .3/4" )( 7 .3/4''_ --, ' w en CD ~ I~ 0 "' ' "' 6 ll\COfl.11\J3 CON DU IT .. I" 0 L w w Ul Y.---8" DIAlvl:::TE~. NOMINAL, BCLLARD 7/D 1 . '-6" :=:ARJ READER :::JECESTAL #36095-----~ ANCHUK l:JLlL COVEtv----------"' 1 /2-13 GALVA\JIZED ANCHOR BOLT, \11N lvlJ\1 (4 'EQllRED.),-------.,_ ::JY UIHlRS 1" CI IAMllR ALL AROUND -----~ ~I FINISHEC GRADE CONCRETE FOUNDATIONJ-----~...._ 1 '-0" •• ·.• ...... · .... ... . . · . .,, .. f. .· .. .. • _ ..... .. 1/2" DIA.tJET:::R • MINIMUM INC OllAINC .• • ~ CON~UI --------~~~~-jf-:.··~:..,..:•~1 .... I I ~ 2" ~--CARD READER HOJSING #36096 . --.~ ' .; . . ... . ~· ...... ·~. :" . •, .· ,• ... r. _..· .~ •;,,, ' -. ' - • ' •• · ..... . . .... : .... . . .... ~ w" >~ u" Uz ' " n .. .. 0 I ' N NOTE: I TCP OF ~ BOLLARD 0\11TillJ FOR CLARITY. NGTE: BOTTOM OF OD_LARD FOUNDATION Olvl TTED FOR C _ARI IY. z " "' w.~ n~ )-L "" c oz w 0: L _, =i u; a,~ w 0: "' < OVERHEAD TRUSS GATE N.T.S. GATE ENTRY ACCESS PEDESTAL-PLAN GATE ENTRY ACCESS PEDESTAL-SECTION 15A GATF C":I OSIJRF- RO.INFORCED HEA "(DU~ cu-ED 6'-o"x12'-o" uNsccuRcD s1Dc " '' "' FOR ::XPCSURE TO CONCRETE PAD -HE WEATH::R, OR A?: RFQlllRFn SWING ADJUSTABLE. TURNSTl_E MANUFACTURER'S STANDARJ MOUNTING =>1 ATFS-SFCURFD AN[) UNSECURED SICES. MOUNTIN::; HEIGHT IU l:ll:. IJl:.11:.HMINl:.IJ l:lY BY DESIGN.----~-CIRECTION ---- --,....,..-~~--=~~f--~~~--f':::I/ t\'WH~"y~U~~~ D COVFR COl\DUIT ANC G_ JUN'.:TION BOX 0 x 2" DIAMETER U~JDrnGROU\JD CJNDUIT WTH Pl.ILL W RE, FOR ACCESS CCNTRO_ W Rl~G. f-URNISHl:.U Al\LJ NSIALLl:.U l:lY IHI:. GENER.AL CONTRACTOR. .11.CCESS CONTROL W Rl\JG FUR\JISHED ,II.ND RPULLED" BY ADT. THRFF-QIJA°'-=-R I FNGTH-----~ l'A\JIC 8.11.R FO~ EXTERIOR USE. FURNISHED Al\D lfJSTtl.LLED BY GATE MAN. _I FACTI_. RFR. . I NIT SUITABLE FOR vEA" ROUND EXPOSURE TO THE ELEIVENTS. l'ERIMETER =-El\CING CJDT11 s1ocs;- 2' CLEAR MAX EQ. EC. 1 " Mtl.X 4'-4" ACAAG C CMPLl.11.NT PFRSONN =-1 Gll.TF 11'-87/8" S::CURED SIJE 1" MAX !j'-3" ROTATING SECTICN OF TURNSTILE 3/4" DIA~1ETER UNDERGROU\JD ::; JNDU T AND WIRING FCR POWER. Fl.RNISHFrJ, NSTAI FrJ, AN[) MArJF OPER.11.TIONAL B"' --iE GENER.11.L CONTR/\CTCR CONTINUOUS ov:R GATE ARRANGEMENT INC LUCIN::; / E/\RB:D WIRE FEN:: __ L_ '/ol RF SllPPO"-ARIJ'> ' N ..... 00 ' ·~ 1 1/2" C_EAR MAX ;ruR~STILE sec URITY SC R[[\J I HIS SllJI:. ON_Y. =-uLL HEIGHT. TURNSTILE MA~UFACTURER'S STANJARD KEY OVERRIDE ~ONTROI NCTE: 1. ALL COMPONE\JT IVANUF.11.CTURER'S l)IM=-NSIONS ARF A::iPROXIMATF. 2. /\L_ C LE/\R/\N::: E DIME\JSIONS 1\RE FXG REQUIREMENTS AND AS SLCH .II.RE FIRM. 3. COORDINATE THIS DE-Al_ WITl-- 1 LRNS LI:_ POWER AND ACCESS CONTROL DE-Al_S, 4 STll.Nl)ARn FXG Fl\JIS--l FOR THIS ARRANGEMENT: IVANLF,11.CTURER'S STAND.fl.RD G/\L\//11\IZED. G. PERSONN::L G.ll.TE AND TL.RNS-ILE LOCKS, COlCS A~D KCYS SI IALL CON-OHM 10 IHI:_ rxc SIANIJA-llJ -OH APPLICATION OF SCHLAGE BRAl\D, SMAL_ f-CRMAI, INll:.RCH.11,NC:.ACLI:. (Sf-IC) FCRMAT. TURNSTILE AND ACCESSIBLE PERSONNEL GATE 1 I/?% SIC.PF 4" Wl:;E STRIPING 5·J' LCNG (TYP.) 7 .. l~% ~I ~PF TRANS TIO~ 6.5% SLOPE fr"'"""'":P'l!~~'/,('4Z?'/.~lj~lj~~~~~&~:',:~:',:~~'/~~l!!it~~~~""'t~rsr~Rl~P~~&-'~'H~E~~L-G~Ul~DE-\ ir--r--lJ~~~~~~~..J.~~:;,;;..;.,;;;;:;;:;~i::i;~i'-'~"'1'~~:111i;:i;;;=;~~~~.f~~::~~-f...:~~~mc11iP 1 S-Rl:::E TRANSITION # SLCPE TYP REF. NOTE 1 FACE ::JF I 1/?% SIO"F. I" . to WALL 1---f!P...~~~~~~~~~~l ~~~~~~~~~~P...~~~..;;;;..~~~~+------+-_j~t ,U--- ---,-T - - -I -,,Vi ~I SAl'YCUT TYP.J ;./ I JUNC110N BOX- HAMMOND MANUFACl\JRING fC3R664SC OR EQUAL. ATTACH TO KINDORF STANCHION. -------, PULlBOX MOUNTING HOLE. N.T.S. BOLT HORIZONTAL CHANNEi. TO \ltR.TICAL WllH 3/a• BOLT & SPRING NUT (T'J'PICAL FOR 2 LOCATIONS). SECURE TO CHANNEi. ..,1H 114· 1 r-----7--MISCEll.ANEous CONDUITS BOLT, WASHER, le SPRING NUT TO/ FOR ACCESS CONTROL (m>ICAL FOR 4). ----~ EQUIPMENT. RJRNISHED, INSTAL!.EO AND MADE KIN DORF Cl <PERA TIONAL BY GENERAL CHANNEl.S CONTRACTa!. fl-905. ----------l-c1:W:ci BOLT TO CONCRElE PAD \111H ~.+f-J-------:7"~-EXPANSON INSERTS & (4) 1/2" 2• RIGID GALVANIZED CONDUIT. -----------i • .. ,., • 'lo BOLTS. ., . • . -...,..~,-~~ A .i ,"ti "" :E REINFORCED CONCRETE PAD (TURNSILE AREA) ~~ NZ ..._ KINDORF POST BASE 1----..,-~::i CONNECTOR fB-924. COMPRESSION FlTTlNG q ADAPlER FROM PVC TO _____ _::::::=!-~----,_, RIGID GALVANIZED CONDUIT. ---.._ ___ 2• DIAMETER CONDUIT AND LOW VOLTAGE \\IRING FOR ACCESS CONTROL TERMINATE INSIDE lHE BUILDING AT lHE ADT DESIGNATED ACCESS POINT. ACCESS CONTROL-SECTION 10B N.T.S. 2" DIAMETER OPENING IN BASE PL.ATE. ------------, TI.JRNSTILE OV POST BASE PL.AlE. -----------, CONCRETE PAD---------, 3/4" DIAMETER P~ CONDUIT 'lllTlt 3 I 101--" ~·-~· .. ·-II-~'-'''-:-··~·· . ' i (1 15 GROUND) TO 20A1P IN FACIUTY 20B/120V ERANCH CIRCUIT PANEL FURNISHED. INSTAllED AND MADE OPERATIONAL BY lHE GENERAL CONTRACTOR -------- ROUlE 3 f 10 (1 IS GROUND) UP IN POST, lERMINATING AT TI.JRNSTILE POWER BOX. TI.JRNSllLE OV POST SlUB CONDUIT UP INTO POST SPACE TERMINATING \111H INSULATING BUSHING. ANCHOR BOLTS- SIZE, DEP1H, AND QUANTITY AS REQUIRED BY OESIGN. T'J'PICAL POWER DETAIL-SECTION 1 OA N.T.S. ' N ....._ w Q_ ~ (f) f-f- Z L w "' w '2. Q_ ASP-jALT 'lFlFAr, F COLRSE TACK COAT------. ASP IALI E INDER COLRSE A.GGREGATE BA.SE---, GLU I LX I ILL I AlJ i,;1c IF REQUIRED BY CESIGN ----- COMPA~TED ~U :::3 G RAlJt..----------- N.T.S. 6" LA.P JO NT FRi.IE COAT (REQUIRED FOR .ASPHALT THICKNESS LESS T-j/\N ~··}-------_J ASPHALT PAVEMENT N.T.S. 6" NO~ INA.L DIAMEER SC -jEDLJLE 40 STEEL PIPE g" DIA. INIMUI, SECTION A-A N.T.S. LENGTH VARIES ACCORDING T'.J TR.ANSITIO~ Z'.JNC: 1 '-0" 5'-0" MAX. SPACING TYP. LOADING DOCK-SECTION 13 SECTION 13B C '<OWN '°A'IEMENT =-o:;; :::R.Al\AGE N.T.S. 4" WIDE STRIP NG 50' LONG (TYP.) \~. ~+-~~~~~rl---""~~ A~JHflL I TRANSi-iON ~It---""'=-• 1~~~N~~~~o...:i .. 1:~1:::::::~::::.~,,,TR~Ar,IL,EiR2~w~1~,:,:~,s'~':'~~E,. ::':::~::':::~::':::1/~2'%jS~W,·,c~,,~7.t3J'%'S~L,,DP,"'~,,~~6.=J%~S-=OF=E~·=~~~Qt=:=i~~~~~~~' ~~ 1-ll:.H:~:.N~l l~/Ll-l STRIPE & WHEEL GUIDE 't 1rr-U-...,......,.....,.-/-...:;.;;..:.,;;;;:~~~""['~~;;....~-+~:::---+~~ 'l STRIPE T'<ANSITION RFF NOTF # 1 I S_OPE TYP . =-ACE o=- WALL --;,,.~rYPT T --------1---J"l LOADING DOCK-PLAN N.T.S. N.T.S. ~ I. WIDTH OF TRANSIT ON C.~N VARY .II.CC :JRDING TO DCOR SP/l,C ING. 6" NO,~INA_ LJIAMlllR SCHllJULl 40 STCCL PIP[ GA.LVANIZCD AND r.AINTEC OSHA YELLOW----~ H!Al_Cr! WH C:EL SIDE ,, _, STANDARD TRAILER WHEEL GUIDE N.T.S. ("\ _, · /L" T-llCK GALVA~IZED STEEL ~LATE BOTH ENDS FAINTED OSHA YELLOW ---J ' c I 1 '-0" ' N ....._ N 0 ' ,, I >-ca z 0 Ui ~ 0 z • 0 z - 10 PROJECT NO. 2151005.00 DET-4 ca -------\ GRAPHIC SCALE I / / / "' 1~" DOSING LINE '<l'. ,,....-_......-- \ <. \ <. 1500 Gallon Top Seam Three Compartment with Fiiter & High Head Pump Item# 1500T·3CP-F-llH OfSI Q'i NOTES • De:o;ign p er performcnce test per ASTM C1227 • Tl':lp SUrfuei! c'.ll'"M 87 .75 ft J • fc Cl 28 doy'I : concret'" = 8 ,00 0 PSI ti.I in. l n3tgllotlon· • To n k la be set a n 5 " min . s o n d bed or pea gr ovel • T o nk to be ba c.~1i l led Ll'l i fo r mly on all ::iidc:i in liil::i le:s !! th em 24" a nd me:hcn lO<l ll)' compa<:tcd • Excavated mo teria l may be u9ed for b ockl'ill, p ro,,.lded lorqe stones ore rema'IE!d · • Excu ... a tiO'l should b e dewa ll"red and tori.: filled with "Wa ter prior ta being pu t in ::ierviee for int1tol l ct ion wi th woier t cDle les s thon 'l' belo'll' 9rade • tdeel:9 Cl B-4+-06 for re:s illen t connectors • Inlet ond OuUe t identl1ied ob ove pipe • Del i ver ed complete 111 fth inlErn o l pip ing • ~econdory safety screen cvafillble w ith PVC riser ALLOW"8L£ BU .~Y- (Based on Waler Table' WATER TABli: ALLOWABLE EARTH FIL.L <r -a· :J' -O" ,. -o· J ' -O" 2 ' -o• 4 ' -a ' J ' -o· 4 ' -Q " DRY •f -a· (2000 Gallon Total Volume) 7 Boot -----------1 62 ~---------- ' .• Top View ;. -.· lylRubbor - . ! . ·.-. · .• 7 - ---------~sr·---------- Section View Pu""' • U.....TSS and....,,,__ CIJll ly la 1leld • E..-pu"" ayotem t> ma1.-oo 1hom- • CamplG -I•-(wiring , ponel, moun1k1g .. d -~"""'"'"""") • Camp!Gw1a11:1 'SeNice c:onfnlcts 8Vlll18ble for maintllnance' Dig ging Specs In vert Dimensions Net Cop<Jcity Ne t We igh t ~in. Mlddle l Outlet 15' Long x: 8 ' Wide In le t Ou lie I L ength Width Height Inlet Side Total l " lank To tal 56" b el ol" inlst 50' 73" 162" 78 " 92" 1016 go l 505 901 507 gol 202a gal 5420 lbs 16 2 40 lbs 2186a lbs Wld&i & 2IKXl5 co. Rd.317 WMI w 'M (711)-.e784 P,0.BmcQ25 \ 0 VALLBY :8Y•re.na i:a: (7 19)396-3727 iuna"111a.cos1211 ProduclB v-· .. II: I t 0 PRBCAST ID.a • Selvlcen www:; a aypreicom ' • Emll: frutjnl:@valle'Anl I mm '\20 0 10 20 40 80 ·~-~-~-·~~I ~I 1----1 ' (INFDT) 1 inch = 20 fl / I / ~ 50 ."'4. I I 5 LF 1~· SCH-40 PVC 0 2.0'1: """ \ \ -. \ THE QUICK4® PLUS STANDARD CHAMBER Quick4 Plus Standard Chaml>er Side and End Views 1------46"------< (EF FE CTIVE LENGTH ) Quick4 Plus All·in-One 12 Encap Front, Side and End Views --18_:2' Quick4 Plus All-in-One Periscope Ouick4 Plu s Standard Chamber Specifications Qu1~1'l.U3 j\LJ. l<-CIN E 1~ ~~ , ,. _J_ • 0 1 ,.. .. ~ Size (W x L x H ) ............ 34' x 53" x 12" (86 cm x 135 cm x 31 cm) Invert Height ................ 0 .6", 5.3", 8.0", 12.7" >-sssssssssssssssssssssssss-< Effect ive Le ng lh . """""'"'"'""""'"'""' """""" 48 " (122 crn) (1 .5 cm , 8.4 cm , 1B.5 cm , 22.6 cm) l N FlL 111 AlOfl SY3TEr.is. me. 'JTANDAAD LIMITED WAARANTl' (11 ) l l!11 ~m 1r o.r..i ll ll!!Jli O, nt ....,..h r.himln•n , ~n1 f1 I"'"· •v ..-ts11 ~m n:t'w or.r-"'=iry m:;rnJ l:1~1.r 11 d hy ln~l1 1an ( "LhN'1 •11111111 m•01i'l11rl anrl oo"<S '.~d 1n Ill kl&Chl'ietd er Mais.IS :s.epbc S>{s.l.t>M IO 9CC«de n«i wi!ii lrt T8ta s 1r;tucl:On$. 1) 1•.'9f11!.nli'd lo flt> aig ne l t)Jrch8.~r ("Hold"r' ) ega~oeec1,-e ma11Yl8iiaod "Qrknaii~p O'lll!Ve8r frcm "daw tha1 Ili a ~tope1m11 $ nim lo! til e t;ei;~c~"m C(flt<lnmg teUne, Pr ""1aed.00 ,..,-'9 r. tial .fa. septic P"m>•t s "QJll&d by li(,IJ:4uble l&w , lt e -•8"11'/ penod .-.i i b&g n uCQl ljie ®te 1t«111st6'.h:i ccr> ol lh e l!lffi~Co 'W&i "1 o::immer>«i~ TO$JCEifC 1 ~e i ts 'Vl'l''&'ill ng>ll;, Hljdil" rr u ~t no ofy nf 11 '8 1CT i n "' ong a1 1t;; CO'sxr 8& Hllack!IJan1;ir.; n Old ~81b'oct. C.:<lr'~r>CID.rl'."'""' 'ltDoo '1 S) d ::ryc QI lh o :ll logOO d~t ool l'l~l ~:lll:< 1~ I n.p p~ ropl::JOCMOn l lk'11t!) lo" Unts dilbJm1 nod by h ti l r :ll c.' i; tio CO-'OfOd !:')' rt-a t n ted W&1 •8JV:i n"l':a:cr'e lab.~'if 03Pecii~e1 y exeluen ti-& 0081 oj rem:>,, el 811d/or r~3tal .i cn of the Un ts (l:i)THE u1.o1r ro 'N~YllJl,.(J Rfr\'1EO I ES 'rJ5lJBOAAAG~(~)A RE EXCL USl \E THE R: A;;f NOOTI-i ER WARR.GJ>ffiESVl llH"tESPE CT 10 "1-E U'llTS , L'.l;:LLD ~-0 NO lV,f\J!;O WNIRfNT IE S PIE OC:HANl/IB!LI TV OR FITl'E SS Fcrl I\ PAATICU~ F\JFPOS E (e ) Th 1::L m•'.odVl~r :m ) ~Ibo ~o.:1 of ~y p $rt of~ eh:im bO! !:'/lll'n •ll m:11 nu •11evad tr/ a.,,,oo o olh or nai .n~lral'.lr T no Lmllild Vlarr1111r.y ow~ ~.;.1 e~nd to m:dtnti:l, -::oo~qu~n~cJ. ~ci G! Of ~ 1ot t .;S;.rno.g.:-c n ~l~(l.t-;f """° n~ b e 'Cl.tole WI' pe nllll,ot ot l q~do.t>c cuno,;~~. in dudin(l k:iS'I of p•cd.c:tm arid proliis_ labor and 1'1 ale neb , m~r-.ea tl coo~. D" Olhe r l r'.IMe~ 01expeme ~1nc.rred by tie Ho ld e r ot m o t ud pm ro: SJ11ocd1t:lil ly e~UdBd h:.r 1rmtll d 'fl'rm ,;r11y CO.l;nige "'" Ll•ml:hge ti dia u ·1 tr< lb ~ o c11:linmv w f<>l · s11d .,,.,_ 3 :e1~1im, :.cad~r~ mS\B?, Hl:lus9 -:.' n•~~~'<:>I :tie llrl~. i:-ieoU'\lts b •r~ !ll..b •e:ed ,ov.no e refie (l"G'Nr c Cl"ld 1 ~ '"'hon ar~ ~p ~nn 1::ed by ti e in ~W'ltl:n n$tn.ie t ~fl~ t.:.i ur & IO 1rsin:t in fi o mirlm ~m g-OLJnd eOlllrs :11<1: fQ'lh in tne i n~uilai l)l i ,,.~~Ct(n$, !h e plac.;ment o f i11pn:.;•<• 11at<r i&$ inti;> fie $f$1em ci:o:ain ~ !he line., l a lUf• <")th; L.'n1ts OI Iha e:ptc $JO!enl o;lia ro '"nP'OPE' SOl•n;I cr mpr1;pu 5'Z ~9. ~CE$'511\'€1 w a1a1 useige. r p rcp;r ~e disposal . cr 1 mpr~111 qi ~raoon ; OI ""If od-Er e~eni: OOI CllJOOd by kllilumcr. lhs ti"n 1mdWEC r11 rty sh all b£>vod f !hit Hdd..-Jal.s m oompl 1 •11lll .a l of t m i..rms str l(lo''lll in lhs limi :M W91'J sn l,'. F ~rth ~•. in no go,;n t '~ll l nliUSl:r' be r esccin$t4 e fc:1 flit"l 'ess or dem&G& l o th&~~.~ Un ~. or en1 th r d pin, r•sU;ng ~om ns11lt1 00fT cr s ~ p "'l en1. '"' ffcm (1111 p·od<.w;c 100 l 1y clBITis of Hddiir '"' lll\'Y Viir d pwty r or th ~ Ln11 wd Vl'a JJ tnfV w i!lll!l41.lh n I.Jo~ mu::i l b¥ ir:;.ta. <!d m 111:£crdarA 1v l1 111 1 ~l':r oon d Ocra fWQU11fld by 11111'.n ilrd lu:;&I oodtos. llllot-i.1 nwl ic!lb:" l11ms. tin:l ~1fiftr 11 :.X ::i i n>lafl:;;ti rn lll&IJlJCtO'lS (d ) No Mpmaenl'l~;:i d l:d lt ator has In n 111..thoi t:, to ch .tr\'.)e o-llXtrmd Ill ii L1n1 tlld Wa;ra nr;. N ~wru rnnti-appll'l:i t> an t Pdft.' oti~• lhln lh ~ cr 19ru HOCe< Tu t IJ.)Q'fe 100 Pri;:"'"'1 b li e SOl dwd Lll'1wd Wcrcll'l\y (lfl(;rod by nfi trt11 cr /!\ lir>' ted rur~r Qf ~WI C$ and 001.m tie:i h tt...., d ~cr~nl .. urn:irty rol!'QJ•o;fTIE!nl:;. AA 1 p1,rchaw c' Unit$ oho:oJ d ~t klll r.ito's;Corp o;ri1e He;o.;lquar1er ~1n Od $;r1bfcxf(. O:i r.~1c;;ut. Pl lO" Q wi;.h pur<:h;l:-;11. to> obld n a C£fll ct m .. ap :l c:&b.'w ::irrWl i,<, and ~iWd c wE'u ly 1al1Cl lt at .-.~rn;.11y prier to lh~ ·~U'c:11a:;~ o.' Lrn w fl!( INFILTRATOR" systems i n c . 6 Bllsiness Park Road .. PO. Box758 O ld S ay b rook . C T 0547 5 B00 .577 7000 •FAX 800.577 7 800 221.4436 www . inf i It r ators,-stems. com For technical assistance , installation instructions or customer service. call Infiltrator Systems at 800.221 4436 ' INSTALL 1500 GAU.ON SEPTIC TANK (MIN.) W/EFFLUENT FILTER LID:5950.50 INV IN: 5947.40 INV OUT:5947.30 AUDIBLE & VISIBLE ALARM MOUNT APPROXIMATE SEWIER CONNECTION INV OUT: 5947.50 CONNECT TO BUILDING SEWIER LINE ,, \ \ - \ \ \ -- I -- Table 7-1 Minimum Horizontal Distances in Feet Between Components of an On -Site Wastewater Treatment System Installed After November 15, 1973 and Water , Ph\l'sical ancl Health Impact Features Sprinq. Poteble Potable Dwelling Property Subsurface Lake , ! Dry Septic Well, 'Nater Water Occupied lin es , Drain . Water Gulr.h, Tank Suction Supply Supply Bui ldi ng Piped or I ntermittent Course, Cut Line Line Cislern Lined Irrigation Irrigation Ba nk. Flit Irrigat ion La te ral , Oili::h , Area Ditch Dryw ell, Stream. (from Stormwater Wetland Crest) Infi ltration Structure ' Septic Tank, Higher L evel 50 2 10 ' 25 5 10 10 50 10 - T reatm ent Unit, Dosing T ank. Vault -- Buildina Sewer or Effluent Lines 50' 10 ' 25 2 0 10' 10' 5<J' 10' ·- STA T rench, STA Bed, Unlined 1003 25 2 25 20 10 25 so" 25 5 Sand Fi lte r . Sub-surface Dispersal System, Seenane Pit Lined Sand Filter 60 10' 25 15 10 10 25 10 5 Lined Evapo-transpiratian F ie ld or ' 60 10' 25 15 10 10 25 10 5 Outside of Berm of Lined Was1ewater Pond Unlined Sand F ilter in Soil With a 100 252 25 15 10 25 25 15 10 Percolation Rate S lower than 60 M i nutes per Inch. Unlined or Partially Li ned Evapotrans- piralion System, Outside of Benn of Unlined Wastewater Pond . or I Sy5tem Not Relying on STA for Treatment Other than Aerosol Vault Privv 50 102 25 I 15 10 10 25 10 -. . Sl it Trench Latrine, Pit P1ivv 4 100 50' 25 NIA 25 25 100 25 N.'A Syste111 Not Relying on STA for 1003 10' 50 125 I 10 0 25' 10 10 Treatment and Utilizing Aerosol I I Methods N OTE: The minimum !l lst:inoe-s shew~ ab0'/4 mu it be m'intiilned bew.oeen the OWTS i:::omponenU; and the re~tu res de~cr ibed ll\lhf,lrf! s o il , g i'l~ogical 01 r:ther ccnd tiori:s If/arrant, grE:oiler i;listanues may he r!JQuired by thl'l klrA I board o f heall~ er b)' the Waler Q ualHy Con1rol Commis$ioo ou rsuant lo section 25 ·8-206, C.R .S . and appliccible re~1,1 lat 1 on:1. For repa11 or upgrading of existing OWTS where ~he sire cit IC1t proclud~ 3dheren<:e to these d istances. a repaired OWTS s.ha l1 not be cloier co set:iacK i.at~re5 than che eir 1s:Sig CM'TS, :3115 re11iewed and approved b~ the loca l putillc he;lti'I iii gen cf Conpone~ts that are not w;ihul i!Jlit ~houkl 1"101 exlerid i nt o areas of the roo1 s~stem of nea r by I MB!. Includes inliltrelio n 911llerias perrnittecl as wels by 11'1e Div 'Ion oi Water Resources . 2 Crossings or encro11uhme11b mH y be pi;,rmilted al tt1 point~ as noted above provided t h et the water or wa:Jtiewater con veyance pipe i3 ence:Jed fer the m,nimum 1Sl'1ba:k distance on each !ide of the cro:»in9. A l engtti of p :pe she l l to used with Cl minimum Schedule 110 rating ofgufficient diam1ner to eaiily iii Ide over and complete I)' enca...e 'h!! corweyancE . R~gid end caps of el leatl Schedule 40 r«tlng must bsg ',lled or secured in a w aterti g ht fa$hlon to the ends of the encasement pipe .. A hcle o f ~uff1dent $\Zeto accCfiYTlod ate the pip9 s h!l l l be dri lle d 1n the lowes1 section ol t~e rigid eap so that t ne conveyance pli::wl rests on the boitom of the encasement l)lpa, The area in wrucr'I tr'le pipe passes t hro1.19h the end caps sha l l be seale<l wit~ an ap r;<ove<l undergrO 'Jnd sealant eompalibla w 1tr'I the p ipi ng used 3 Add eighr feet <'ddition;i l disjence for each 10Ct ~allons p~r day of design flcr,lr.;i. betwatln 1 _.0 00 and 2,000 gallons ~er da)', unless it can b e demonstrated by a pro •essiona l en~i nce r or ~eotogist b:,-a h)'drologic ana l )'SIS gr the U!l-e 01 a :l&rrle', consist ing of a m il"l1mum 3'0 mi PVC liner orequ~yafent, that ~tamin;Jt~on will b~ m ·n mize:i; .11-e~uent ma7's Treatm ent leYel JN and the local put:il ic health agency h as a 11ain '.~nance oversight program 1n accordaru w ith section 14.D . of 1h1s re gul ation, the dtstanoe add~1on 1s not ~q u ired . Flows eqllal ta or greater th11 n 2.1)00 g11lons per day mtJM be t-yd·o 'r>;:.;a l ana i ~z:od for flow, 11elocity, hydrau lic i'le ad, and other pertinent characteristics as means of estam<Jtirig di5ta~ces requi red to m1ni mil.e egntam1nat1on as pa11 or the 0 vi sion Sl!E 3?P l~:a1 1 on prote!-!. 4 New i n'Sla ll ations f or pit p rivy end s lil t~nches not al lO'lloed Automatic Distributing Valves Top V'lllW-V6402 Top Viaw-V6403 6000 Series 1 .5" inlet & outlet 1 5 -1 00 gpm flowrate RECESS TOP OF LID 1 /8" TO 1/4" BELOW FINISH GRADE FINISH GRADE 4" COUPLING 4" SEWIER LINE COVER WITH WORD "SEWER" 4" RISER 4" 45' SWIEEP BEND Rocommondedl-- Alr R:m-e Valve 30' Pl/O Enclaaunt From Plll!'IP_ ~-Side View w-a Watauuallii o VALLEY := 0 PRECAS'I'. Ille. • - Fn: (719) 395-370 2lllJ0!5 c.. l"1. 317 P .O. l!OK1125 lbno\111111, C081211 -Ito! WWW.\111~ Ell'llll; llutd k@Ym~ ~ OCl.EAN OUT -----ASSEMBLY SEWER CLEAN OUT DETAIL N.T.S. ~ 1. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHAU. BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE GARFIELD COUNlY REGULATIONS OF INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSlEMS, EVEN THOUGH ALI. SUCH REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT SPECIFICALI.Y NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SUCH SPECIFIC DETAILS AS ARE REFlERRED TO IN THE ABOVE MENTIONED REGULATIONS. 2. DESIGN FLOW (Q) FOR BED: 30 EMPLOYEES * 5 GAU.ONS/EMPLOYEE/DAY + 25 EMPLOYEES * 20 GALLDNS/EMPLOYEE/8-HOUR SHIFT /DAY IS: 650 GPO = DESIGN FLOW (Q) SEPTIC TANK: MINIMUM TOTAL TANK SIZE: Q * 1 DAY/24 HRS * 30 HRS -812.5 GPO -> USE 1000 GPD MINIMUM INSTALL ONE 1,500-GALLON TANK WITH BAFFLE -INSTAU. BIO-FILTER IN SEPTIC TANK OUTLET- Soil Treatment Area (square feet) required = Design Flgw Cgq! /dgy) LTAR (gal/day/square foot) = 850 Gpp = 1857 SF 0.35 Size ad)Jstment factor for methods of appllcatlon from Table 10-2 Use 1.1 for Dosed (Siphon or Pump) Bed Size ad).lstment factor for types of storage/distribution media from Table 10-3 Use 0.7 for Bed Chambers Adjusted Soil Treatment Area = Soil Treatment Area * Size AdjJstment Factor(s) = 1857 SF * 1.1 * D.7 = 143D S1F Area of chamber base = 12.00 S1F 143D SF /12.00 SF = 119.2 Units --> Use 120 Units 3. SOIL AND FOUNDATION INVESTIGATION INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED BY HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. PROJECT N0.115 023A , DATED FlEBRUARY 27, 2015. THE TYPICAL SOIL PROFILE CONSISTED OF SILT AND CLAY AND GRAVEL AND COBBLES. 4. REFlER TO GEOTECHNICAL REPORT BY BY HEPWORTH-PAWILAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. FOR DETAILED SOIL EVALUATION. PERCOLATION TEST INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED TESTS PERFORMED ON FEBRUARY 24, 2D15. THE (4) PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS AVERAGED 41.25 MINUTES PER INCH (30, 30, 45 & 60 MIN/IN) AND INDICATES A LONG-TERM ACCEPTANCE RATE OF D.35 GAL/DAY/SQUARE FOOT. 5. CLEAN OUTS ARE REQUIRED AT AU. BENDS AND AT LEAST EVERY 100 FEET ALONG THE SEWIER. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHAU. BE RESPONSIBLE FDR INSTALLING ALL WATER TIGHT COMPONENTS, PRIOR TD THE ABSORPTION AREA, TO PREVENT INFILTRATION. 7. TOPSOIL COVER MAY BE VARIED (WITH 1 FOOT MINIMUM) TO AU.OW LANDSCAPING. 8. INSTALL RISERS AS NECESSARY TO BRING ALL ACCESS POINTS TO WITHIN ONE-HALF FOOT OF FINAIL GRADE. 9. LOCATIONS OF AU. COMPONENTS MAY BE VARIED AS NECESSARY AS LONG AS AU. MINIMUM DISTANCES AND SLOPES MEET THOSE REQUIRED. 10. PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE OF SURFACE WATER AWAY FROM ABSORPTION FIELD AREA USING DRAINAGE SWALES AS NECESSARY. 11. THIS DRAWING DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN OWTS PERMIT. PERMIT MUST BE OBTAINED FROM APPROPRIATE CllY OR COUNlY OFFICIALS. THE ENGINEER MUST OBSERVE CONSTRUCTED SYSlEM BEFORE BACKFILL AND PROVIDE REPORT TO COUNTY. 12. THIS SYSTEM IS SIZED FOR TYPICAL DOMESTIC WASTES ONLY. BACKWASH OR FLUSHING FLOWS FOR REVERSE OSMOSIS UNITS OR WATER SOFTENERS OR FILTERS SHOULD NOT BE INTRODUCED INTO THIS SYSTEM. 13. SITE PLAN INFORMATION FROM ARCHITECT. 14. INSTALL BLUEBOARD INSULATION OVER SEWER PIPE WHEREVER DEPTH IS LESS THAN 5.0 FEET. 15. THE ENGINEER SHALL BE CONTACTED FOR SITE INSPECTION PRIOR TO BACKFILLING OF SYSTEM COMPONENTS • 16. THIS SYSTEM IS DESIGNED FOR TYPICAL DOMESTIC WASTES ONLY. OWNER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR TIGHT PLUMBING FIXTURES. I.E. HISSING TOILETS AND RUNNING WATER IS NOT ACCEPTABLE AND MAY OVERLOAD THE DESIGNED SYSTEM. 17. HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING RECOMMENDS CONCRETE SEPTIC TANKS. 18. IT IS ASSUMED NO WELLS WIU./ARE LOCATED WITHIN A 100' RADIUS. 19. MINIMUM GRADE OF SE~ SHALI. BE 1/4" PER LINEAR FOOT. 1. DISTRIBUTION LINES SHAU. BE A MAXIMUM OF 150 FEET LONG. 2. DISTRIBUTION LINES LONGER THAN 10D FEET SHALI. BE PRESSURE DOSED OR THE APPLICATION OF THE EFFLUENT SHAU. BE AT THE CENTER OF THE LINE. 3. THE BOTTOM OF EACH ABSORPTION BED SHAU. BE LEVEL. 4. DRAINAGE SWALES ARE TO BE PROVIDED ABOVE AND AROUND BEDS, AS NECESSARY, TO PREVENT SURFACE RUNOFF FROM ENTERING ABSORPTION AREA. 5. BED LATERALS SHAU. FOLLOW CONTOURS. 6. INSTALL INFILTRATOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. 7. BED BOTTOM AND SIDEWALLS MUST BE RAKED TO REMOVE SOIL SMEARS INCURRED DURING EXCAVATION. 8. NO EXCAVATION OF ABSORPTION FIELD IS TO BE DONE DURING WIET WIEATHER AND USE OF RUBBER TIRE VEHICLES OVER ABSORPTION AREA IS PROHIBITED. 9. BOULDERS EXISTING WITHIN THE BED SHAU. BE EXCAVATED AND BACKFIU. SHALL CONSIST OF ONSITE SELECT OR PIT-RUN MATERIAL. OOSANClI& 1. MINIMUM DOSING SHAU. BE 16D GALI.CNS. 20 GPM PUMP AT MIN. 30' TOTAIL DYNAMIC HEAD. DRIPLINE SHALI. HAVE *•" HOLES DRIU.ED 5' ON-CENTER FACING UP EXCEPT THE FIRST AND LAST HOLES Will. BE FACING DOWN. 4• ---, SOLID PIPE REMOVABLE CAP 4 -1/2" VENT HOLES ,_ _____ 34• ----~-i INSPECTION WELL DETAIL N.T.S. MIN. 1' >-ca z 0 Ui ~ 0 z • 0 z - 0 u u --1~ -1 z -:i ~o <i u ro D Iii -1 <i !!:! w LL. 0:: ~ 10 PROJECT NO. 2151005.00 C9 . -10 0 0 I 0 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 0 0 I 0 0 I 0 I 0 0 I 0 I 0 { !I , /LI --·~-ifl:i:0=====::i:.=i.========::i:.;;il :i:.========::i:.:i;=l t·========:.:e;;:;_.c:========.:er;_;:.c:========.E=. fF--.c:========.i;:;F-1.c:========.i;_;;;; •. ~ _ l;;=::;_:;;;=;:_;:;;;;;;,j ;:;;_::;;;;;_,;::;_:;;;=;:-;:;;j =;:;_:;;;:;;I ::;_:;;;=;:_;:;;=;:;-::;;;;;;:::;_:;;;i;' .c = : ::: : -_,-: ::: : ._ __ ,_ -0 '1 '1 '1 '1 '1 : t4' • I ll' i 1~· i •. ll 10" I ~ ~I I '~ ! ~ I Si I -W-.~--~--o=J , '1 '1 '1 '1 I !-·-·1 r·-·i } j I / ' / ' / ' / ' / ' / ' / ' / ' / ' / ' / ' / ' / ' / ' / ' i ! L ./ L ./ \ . .j ' ' ' ' ' L J I I I I I 1/·"--I . ' ' ......... --~i'?9!2!L --!-~•[]' I I @ I @ @ ~ ~ @ 0 _{;\ I-----~I-----1-~ -~ -t------------- -----!----- - -----!-~---_l.......)ci - - - -· · --i'F",-==,ri--4'..-.,==;ri--1>;,~-~="74, -@-, -/ ,-7 ~ -t-;=,=~-~,r1--1-z ,,=_=:~,;=rl-11~!)'"'-~o=,=-~""' ,1-ri:=,=~-'>" ,H~~,. ~~ ,~-~=,'4 I -·r------------I-~---· ' I ' I ' I ' I 0 0 -----J -~ ----~ -- --1-!---- ' -/ ,!I ------'\ -/ ~ \. -/ ' / ~-----· '\ -/ @-· [ .l· L ELOOB EL 100.00' ~= 8' 11 II' """'""°'" DOaC DOOR 8' II I' ....., --~~--J -co . ' ' 0 ...-: ~ r ____::,,. .... -id:'::::;;:===::d'~;i::::;;:~r~-t!==:!:::!:!n;M,1 ==41:;1 ' """""""' 1---1===~1 1 "-=- _,L _ ------~1--------_) ______ [ ·----------· ~~ I OXll r<. m ~~ ' \ (le> $() I I ADM IN. OFFICE rrlii\, ' I ' I ~.i ' I ? \._ \.. ---0 ( ~-' :~·==============================;:::·=================;:::!::::::::::::=:::=:;:::·::::::::::::=:::=:;:::·::===;11:==~=0~===~1 ===~j :====::;::,====~:==l\_J~·~======!!!!!!!!!!=:~::d.!:~::.,;~"""';»;;;<:.,;':t";,,~::-::!:=~-c:::=$:.!\, "'l:."'F"=\'==:!!:::=~l:!:::::::i:::!!:::::::c::::c::::::!:~== ~---=:=====:~--,--(;) ni: · · · LJ · · ~ ''--0 ' ' it ! ! ! ! ! · I I I 11 § i i i ii 11 ' ' 11 ' ' 11 1· ... 2 · 1 , .36'..o" , :r-o• , 22'..(I" , 22·-o· , ir..o· , 22"..(I" , i1· .. a· , i•·-a· , lO' .. O" , 1 1··2 · ~-r·~-----==--------:---~"-"'-----:--1---==----':-----==-----;l---~,~~~4-.---~l ----"-'"----:-~--"-"''---·~1~----'"-=----~-------"'-=------:-1 +1 --"""' I I I I I I I I ~~ BU I LD I NG PLAN 1. PERIMETER WAU.S .t FOUNDATIONS AT GRADE AAE.JS SHAU. BE 8" A8CNE NOlolNAL FIN. Fl.. El.EVATlONS REF'ER 2/0-2. 2. COflNEYOR EQUIPMENT TO BE f1JRMSHE0 AH O INSTAIJ.ED 8Y TENANT. 3. DISTRIBUTION AREA (ANO VEHICLE MAINTEJU,NCE GMACE. F AN'() WILL BE HEATED. 4. REFER TO ELEVATIONS TO VERI FY ~ INSTAU.ATION THIS P""'5C, S. IF REQUIRED SY CODE. OISTRElllllOH AA£A {ANO VEHCL£ MANltNANCC GARAGE. IF" AN'() WU RECOVE A W(J-T'rPE SPRINKl.ER SYSTEM. ' ' "' 11. 11. .. i5 il> 5 w "' 6 z ¢ ¢ '' N N ~~ ........ 0 0 ~~ "" ..: Co Co ;C HORIZ · 3/32"" = 1-0' A LE VERT N/A 0 SHEET '---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------'---------' A·l c:o I ...- N METAL WALL PANEL -COLOR: GAUNTLET GRAY METAL WALL PANEL -COLOR: GAU NTLET GRAY METAL ROOF GA LVALUME PANEL METAL ROOF GALVALUME PANEL EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 3 /32" = 1'-0" D DOOR SIGN = 230'-4" DOOR -COLOR : IRO N OR E PROVIDE GUTTER AND DOWNSPOUTS TYP . PROVIDE CANOPY AT OFF ICE AND MAIN DISTR IB UT I ON AREA ENTR ANCES. DOOR -CO LOR : IRON ORE METAL WA LL PANEL -COLOR: GAUNTLE T GRAY META L ROOF GALVALUME PA NE L ~ tO ~ ---- STANDARD BUILD ING MOUNTED SIGN SUBSURFACE RAINWATER DRAINS AT OF FI CE PER IMETER PROV ID E GUTTER & DOWNSPOUTS AT MAIN BUILDING SIG N lD co ,.- ~ I -,..---DOOR SEAL (TYP .) ---- = OC> ~ I ~ -.;!" N N I -N N COLOR: IRON ORE A SOUTH ELEVATI ON SCALE: 3/32" = 1 '-0" 116'-4" DOOR -COLOR : IRON ORE '<t N = METAL ROOF GALVALUME PA NE L N I N N 0 I ':.;j. 116' -4 " DOOR -COLOR: IRON ORE '---DOOR SEAL (TYP .) NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: 3/32" = 1-0" c META L WA LL PANE L -COLOR: GA UNTLET GRAY PROVIDE GUTTER AND DOW NS POUTS TYP. •••• PROVIDE BUILD ING MANUFAC TURERS STANDARD CANOPY WITH GUTTER & DOWNSPOUTS 5 '-0" 11~1111 lllllll~Ulllltml~lllllll~llll ll~llllllllllllllllmfijlllltml•lllUlllllllll~lllll~lllllllllll•llll~lll~llllUllltml~lllltml•lllllllllllllU~llllllllllllllllllBlllllll!lllllUl!ltml~llllllllll•lllllllllllll~lllllllllllllllll~lrn ALUM INUM -.,_ GUITER & DOWN SPOUT PRE -FIN ISHED METAL WALL PANELS flNISHED FLOOR APPROX. GRADE ALUMINUM DRIP FLASHING c:o I v N -11 I I I L--1----------------------~ REINFORCED CONCRETE . EAST ELL\ I A Tl 0 N SlAB AND FOUNDATION. C:.V. SEE FOUNDATION DRAWINGS. 1/4" = 1·-0· -~· . 'ii a a' m' .m mi m) DOOR -COLOR: IRO N ORE PRE-FINISHED METAL WALL PANELS CONCRETE APPROACH SlAB SEE SITE DRAWINGS ~ I I I I I Ii B = I . . I WEST EL EVATION SCALE: 3/32" = 1'-0" I I I I I I I II PRE-FIN ISHED METAL WALL PAN ELS ALUMI NUM GUTIER & DOWN SPOUT APPROX. GRADE _ J1NISHE12_ [l.OOR I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Ir L Ii ii Ii = = = 230' -4" -__ I "--APPROX. GRADE I I REINFORCED ) ~g~~~N0N~~~EAND ~ _________________________ J ~~~~~E~O~~~~~g~.~ _________________________ J ~~~~~~N SO UTH ELEVAT ION ~~wf~~~DATioN WEST ELEVAT ION 1/4" = 1·-0· 1/4" = 1'-o· I I I I I I Ii CONCRETE APPROACH SlAB SEE SITE DRAWINGS = I I I :1 I I I I ii ,. .Ii = ALUMINUM DR IP FLASHING ---,,. ALUMIN UM GUTTER & DOWN SPOUT flNISHED FLOOR I I I I I I I I I I I I ii. Ii I . I = REINFORCED --- CONCRETE SlAB AND I I FOUNDATION. SEE I I FOUNDATION L - - -______________________ _J DRAWINGS. NORTH ELEVATION 1/4" = 1'-o· ---PRE-flNISHED METAL WALL PANEL CONCR r APPRO CH SlAB SEE SITE DRAWl i GS -C> r- U"") .~ co~ ...._,~ Ol <i:: ~ c:: -·-e c: c:: 0 3: c:: "' 0 u ... 0 .=-e a.. v ~>- + vo "' "' Q) ..'::> ~ ~ (/) Qj :::> c: 4-' 0 u ~in Q) °'in 4-' .£; N ..c:: c: C> c: u v C> I... 0..N <: ~~ -' "'C> ON CD win CD in (/) ~..;...; ~~ v -.......... ~ N ( N ( ........ -,..... I 0 ( w I- <i:: a ( CI) (/) I- :;..: CD a w ::.:: (..) w :c (..) v -.......... - N ( N ( .......... -,..... 0 w I- <i:: a CD (/) I- :;..: CD a w z: (.;) V5 w a (}) co 0::: 0 _u (/) - (.{) ~ 1-Z 0::: ·o.. ~ (/) uO wO (/) 0 3= zz -w o _J wO I- <{ u 0 _J I ( • C HORIZ ij_t VERT 3/32" = 1- N/A I I I I I I I I I I I \ I I \ I I \ \ \ \ I \ I \ \ \ \ I I I I \ \ I I I I I I I I I \ I I I I I I I I I \ I I I \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ' -- ,. .. I ~ \ \ \ \ -• . ' ' ' ', SC HEDULE PL AN T MA TERI AL COMMON NAME SYMBOL BOTAN ICAL NAME Acer platanoides uercus gambe lii Pinus ponderosa SAND ACCENTS: SHRUB -,dahoensis estuca Pe rovskia atriplicifo lia d"la angustifo lia Lavan u ~~ricea 'Allemans' Comus= Corn us stolon ife ra 'F lav irarnea' Norway Maple Patmore Ash European Spruce Gambel Oak Ponderosa Pine Idaho Fescue Russian Sage English Lavender Red Twig Dogwood Yellow Twig Dogwood ..... • ·. ',, ' .. .. '~~ -~- ... : ~ ~~ ~~ SIZE QTY COMMENTS 2" caliper 3 STANDARD 2" caliper 6 STANDARD min.he ig ht 6' 4 STANDARD 2" calipe r 3 STANDARD min.he ig ht 6' 3 STANDARD 5 gallon 22 5 gallon 16 5 gallon 7 5 gallon 29 5 gallon 11 ...... . ; . ·-. ~. " " JJ 'O ;,, " rO m °' <m -0 '" '" "'c '" --r -0 o_ oz -Gl ~·== .. .• _, .. GROUNOCOVERS: I I r=I ,,___I - Daphne cneorurn h izontalis Juniperus or Mahonia repens . Walk -On Bark Mulch Orgarnc _ 112' Screened Native Seed Mix .. ···- I I I I ' [. :-; i L. =-=---.4-~ .. . . 6. Rose Daphne Creeping Juniper Creeping Ma/Joma T-.-• • 6. 1 gallon 16 1 gallon 9 1 gallon 9 314' MINUS -~.....--=------,- . . . , . .. .. -: .'. •. ..•. • .. ··:··'. .. . .. ·-~ .. : ,•.· -·· . ·-:. .. . •. I . ··~ ' I ! J - ' I - I • I I ... ·•;.. -- -------- -UE L 0 \ 1~5 ~30 60 LIE & NORTH (/) 1-z w ~ :J () 0 0 z 0 -I- () :J a::: I- C/) z 0 () w 0.... <( () (/) 0 z <( _J z 0 (f) [ij 0:: (lJ ~I u =~ 0. "' u o ~ c DATE: 06.12 .15 ~ I c :::J 0 (...) () _J _J I- C/) w >< s w~ ""'C z Q) ffi LL S2 • 0 () -~ z :J 0 () 0 _J w -LL a::: <( C) PLANTING CONCEPT PL 1.01 GARFIELD COUNTY MAJOR IMPACT REVIEW Eastbank -FedEx Ground Facility TEAM MEMBERS Kevin Kiernan Roger Neal David McConaughy Nicole Garrimone-Campagna Davis Farrar Michael Erion Robert Fitch THE SITE MINOR SUBDIVISION SITE PLAN WATER SUPPLY TRAFFIC ADJACENT USES QUESTIONS –COMMENTS? Thank you Cost Estimate 03.12.2015 ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY. UNIT COST TOTAL 1 2" Caliper Trees (Nursery) 8 ea. 225.00$ 1,800.00$ 2 6' Height Trees (Nursery) 9 ea. 225.00$ 2,025.00$ 3 5 Gal. Shrubs (Nursery) 85 ea. 22.00$ 1,870.00$ 4 1 Gal. Shrubs (Nursery) 34 ea. 10.00$ 340.00$ 5 Native Seed Mix 48,263 s.f. 0.06$ 2,895.78$ 6 Bark Mulch 7,600 s.f. 0.30$ 2,280.00$ 11,210.78$ ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY. UNIT COST TOTAL 7 Drip Irrigation 7,600 s.f. 0.35$ 2,660.00$ 8 Native Seed Mix Watering (until established) 28,419 s.f. 0.10$ 2,841.90$ SUBTOTAL: 2,841.90$ 14,052.68$ 10% CONTINGENCY: 1,405.27$ 15,457.95$ GRAND TOTAL: LANDSCAPE SUBTOTAL: IRRIGATION FedEx Garfield County Prepared for: Kierland West, LLC LANDSCAPE SUBTOTAL: TOTAL: Nicole Garrimone-Campagna, Esq. March 25, 2015 Garfield & Hecht, P.C. 420 Seventh Street, Suite 1000 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 RE: KW Glenwood Springs LLC - Lot 1 Water Quality Results for Proposed Land Use Application Dear Nicole: This letter report presents the technical analysis of the water quality for the new well at the proposed KW Glenwood Springs, LLC facility. This letter supplements the March 10, 2015 Water Demand and Supply Report prepared by Resource Engineering, Inc. (RESOURCE). WATER QUALITY A water sample for the new well was obtained by RESOURCE on March 3, 2015. The sample was shipped by overnight delivery under proper chain of custody to National Testing Laboratories (results attached). In accordance with the criteria established by the Garfield County Land Use and Development Code, the well was tested for inorganic compounds including metals, coliform, alkalinity, corrosivity, hardness, pH, total dissolved solids, and radionuclides. The results indicate that the well water meets the basic EPA primary and secondary drinking water standards, except for gross alpha. Alpha particles come from erosion of natural deposits of certain minerals including uranium, radon, and radium that are radioactive and may emit a form of radiation. The water quality of a nearby well was also tested on March 3, 2015 and did not have an elevated level of gross alpha. RESOURCE recommends retesting the well water for uranium, radon, radium and grass alpha to determine the source of alpha activity and if the elevated level of gross alpha was an outliner. Based on the new test results, recommendations for water treatment such as aeration, water softening, and reverse osmosis will be presented, if necessary. The water quality results show several parameters that result in taste and aesthetic issues related to hardness, turbidity, and iron bacteria. The well water hardness is high at 320 mg/l, which is considered very hard. The hard water can cause scale to build up on water fixtures and lessen effectiveness of soaps. RESOURCE recommends use of a water softener to lower the hardness of the water. The water softening will also treat alpha particles, if present. The turbidity level was slightly elevated with a value of 1.3 NTU. The slightly elevated level of turbidity is not a concern, and is probably related to the well being drilled the day before the water sample was collected. The turbidity level will decline as the well is put into production. Iron bacteria with a population of 9,000 cfu/mL was also present in the well water. Iron bacteria is not harmful to humans but can be a nuisance. It can cause water to have a foul taste/odor and leave intermittent brown staining of plumbing fixtures. The Iron bacteria found in the well can be treated with disinfection by shock treating the well in accordance with the CDPHE Guidelines for Shock Chlorination of W ells and W ater Systems (copy attached). Nicole Garrimone-Campagna March 25, 2015 Page 2 CONCLUSION The laboratory results for the water quality analysis indicate that the water meets all primary and secondary drinking water standards, except gross alpha. RESOURCE recommends retesting the well water to determine the sources of alpha activity and if the elevated level of gross alpha was an outlier. If necessary, appropriate treatment technology will be recommended based on the new test. The parameters related to taste and aesthetics, hardness and iron bacteria, can be addressed with standard water softening equipment to treat the hard water and the disinfection of the well to treat the iron bacteria. The water quality is suitable for domestic uses provided that appropriate treatment is provided for removal of gr oss alpha emitting particles, if necessary. Please call if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, RESOURCE ENGINEERING, INC. Michael J. Erion, P.E. Water Resources Engineer MJE/mmm 1325-17.1 Attachments These results may be invalid. Ordered By: Resource Engineering 909 Colorado Avenue Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 ATTN: Ryan McBride Client: This informational water quality report compares the actual test result to national standards as defined in the EPA's Primary and Secondary Drinking Water Regulations. Informational Water Quality Report Sample Number: Collection Date and Time: Received Date and Time: Date Completed: 852174 3/3/2015 13:30 3/5/2015 08:55 3/17/2015 Well Water Definition and Legend The contaminant was not detected in the sample above the minimum detection level. The contaminant was detected at or above the minimum detection level, but not above the referenced standard. The contaminant was detected above the standard, which is not an EPA enforceable MCL. The contaminant was detected above the EPA enforceable MCL. mg/L (ppm): The lowest level that the laboratory can detect a contaminant. ND:The contaminant was not detected above the minimum detection level. Minimum Detection Level (MDL): Unless otherwise indicated, results and standards are expressed as an amount in milligrams per liter or parts per million. Fed-Ex New Well, 1325-17.1Location: Type of Water: Well-Check (+Dis Fe, Tann, & Corr) Primary Standards:Are expressed as the maximum contaminant level (MCL) which is the highest level of contaminant that is allowed in drinking water. MCLs are enforceable standards. Secondary standards:Are non-enforceable guidelines regulating contaminants that may cause cosmetic effects (such as skin or tooth discoloration) or aesthetic effects (such as taste, odor,or color) in drinking water. Individual states may choose to adopt them as enforceable standards. Action levels:Are defined in treatment techniques which are required processes intended to reduce the level of a contaminant in drinking water. 6571 Wilson Mills Rd Cleveland, Ohio 44143 1-800-458-3330 NA:The contaminant was not analyzed. Microbiologicals Total Coliform and E.coli were ABSENT, however bacteria results may be invalid due to lack of collection information or because sample has exceeded 30 hour holding time. Total Coliform by P/A Inorganic Analytes - Metals NDAluminum mg/L 0.2 EPA Secondary 0.1 NDArsenic mg/L 0.010 EPA Primary 0.005 NDBarium mg/L 2 EPA Primary 0.30 NDCadmium mg/L 0.005 EPA Primary 0.002 93.4Calcium mg/L --2.0 NDChromium mg/L 0.1 EPA Primary 0.010 NDCopper mg/L 1.3 EPA Action Level 0.004 0.100Iron mg/L 0.3 EPA Secondary 0.020 NDIron-Dissolved mg/L --0.020 NDLead mg/L 0.015 EPA Action Level 0.002 21.21Magnesium mg/L --0.10 0.020Manganese mg/L 0.05 EPA Secondary 0.004 NDMercury mg/L 0.002 EPA Primary 0.001 NDNickel mg/L --0.020 3.8Potassium mg/L --1.0 NDSelenium mg/L 0.05 EPA Primary 0.020 18.7Silica mg/L --0.1 NDSilver mg/L 0.100 EPA Secondary 0.002 8Sodium mg/L --1 NDZinc mg/L 5 EPA Secondary 0.004 Physical Factors 280Alkalinity (Total as CaCO3)mg/L --20 320Hardness mg/L 100 NTL Internal 10 7.5pH pH Units 6.5 to 8.5 EPA Secondary Status Contaminant Results Units National Standards Min. Detection Level Page 2 of 3 Sample: 852174Product: Well-Check (+Dis Fe, Tann, & Corr)3/17/2015 11:05:09 AM 420Total Dissolved Solids mg/L 500 EPA Secondary 20 1.3Turbidity NTU 1.0 EPA Action Level 0.1 Inorganic Analytes - Other 6.2Chloride mg/L 250 EPA Secondary 5.0 NDFluoride mg/L 4.0 EPA Primary 0.5 NDNitrate as N mg/L 10 EPA Primary 0.5 NDNitrite as N mg/L 1 EPA Primary 0.5 NDOrtho Phosphate mg/L --2.0 100.0Sulfate mg/L 250 EPA Secondary 5.0 NDTannin/Lignin mg/L --0.5 We certify that the analyses performed for this report are accurate, and that the laboratory tests were conducted by methods approved by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency or variations of these EPA methods. These test results are intended to be used for informational purposes only and may not be used for regulatory compliance. National Testing Laboratories, Ltd. NATIONAL TESTING LABORATORIES, LTD Status Contaminant Results Units National Standards Min. Detection Level Page 3 of 3 Sample: 852174Product: Well-Check (+Dis Fe, Tann, & Corr)3/17/2015 11:05:09 AM Informational Water Quality Report Rads Basic ~National Testing Laboratories, Ltd. Client: Ordered By: Resource Englneering 909 Colorado Avenue Glenwood Springs , CO 81601 ATIN: Ryan McBride Definition and Legend L Sample Number: Location Type of Waler· Collection Date and Ti me; Received Date and Time: Date Completed ; 852183 6571 Wison Mills Rd Cleveland, Ohio 44143 1-SOD-458-3330 Fed-Ex New Well, 1325-17 .1 Well Water 3/3/2015 13:30 3/5/2015 08 :55 3/16/2015 This informational water quality report compares the actual test result to national standards as defined in the EPA's Primary and Secondary Drinking Water Regulations . Primary Standards: Are expressed as the maximum contaminant level {MCL) which is the highest level of contaminant that is allowed in drinking water. MCLs are enforceable standards . Secondary standards: Are non-enforceable guidelines regulating contaminants that may cause cosmetic effects (such as skin or tooth discoloration) or aesthetic effects {such as taste, odor.or color) rn drinking waler. Individual states may choose to adopt them as enforceable standards . Action levels: Are defined in treatment techniques which are required processes intended to reduce the level of a contaminant in drinking water. mgtL (ppm): Unless otherwise indicated . results and standards are expressed as an amount in milligrams per liter or parts per million_ Minimum Detection The lowest level that the laboratory can detect a contaminant. Level (M DL): ND: The contaminant was not detected above the minimum detection level. NA: The contaminant was not analyzed . ~ The contaminant was not detected in the sample above the minimum detection level. e The contaminant was detected at or above the minimum detection level , but not above the referenced standard . l1. The contaminant was detected above the standard, which is not an EPA enforceable MCL + The contaminant was detected above the EPA enforceable MCL. )C These results may be invalid_ Status Contaminant Results Units National Standards Min Detection Level Inorganic Analytes -Metals e Uranium 0.004 mg/L 0.030 EPA Primary 0,001 Radiologicals + Gross Alpha 24.3 pCi/L 15 EPA Primary 3.0 e Gross Beta 10.2 pCi/L 4 ,0 We cerlify that the analyses pelformed for this reporl are accurate, end that the laboratory tests were conducted by methods approved by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency or variations of these EPA methods. These test results ere intended to be used for informetionet purposes only end may not be used for regulatory compliance. National Testing Laboratories, Ltd. NATIONAL TESTING LABORATORIES. LTD Page 2 of 2 311612015 11 21 :43 AM Product: Rads Basic Sample: 852183 Informational Water Quality Report Iron Bacteria Client: ~National Testing Laboratories, Ltd. Ordered By: .) Resource Engineering 909 Colorado Avenue Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 ATTN: Ryan McBride Definition and Legend ' Sample Number: Locatfon: Type of Water. Collection Date and Time: Received Date and Tme: Date Completed ; 852178 6571 Wison MiHs Rd Cleveland, Ohio 44143 1·600-456-3330 Fed-Ex New Well, 1325-17.1 Well Water 31312015 13:30 3/512015 08:55 3/10/2015 This lnfonnalional water quality report compares the actual test result to national standards as defined In the EPA's Primary and Secondary Drinking Water Regulations. Primary Standards: Are expressed as the maximum contaminant level (MCL) which Is the highest level of contaminant that Is allowed In drinking water. MCLs are enforceable standards. Secondary standards: Are non-enforceable guidelines regulating contaminants that may cause cosmetic effects (such as skin or tooth discoloration) or aesthetic effects (such as taste, odor, or color) In drinking water. Individual states may choose to adopt them as enforceable standards. Action levels: Are defined In treatment techniques which are required processes Intended to reduce the level of a contaminant In drinking water. mg/L (ppm): Unless otherwise Indicated, results and standards are expressed as an amount In mUllgrams per liter or parts per million. Minimum Detection The lowest level that the laboratory can detect a contaminant. Level (MDL): ND: The contaminant was not detected above the minimum detection level. NA: The contaminant was not analyzed. '1' The contaminant was not detected In the sample above the minimum detection level. e The contaminant was detected at or above the minimum detection level, but not above the referenced standard . 6 The contaminant was detected above the standard, which Is not an EPA enforceable MCL. + The contaminant was detected above the EPA enforceable MCL. )( These results may be invalid . Status Contaminant Iron Bacteria by PIA Results Unila National Standards Min . Detection Level Microblologfcals Iron Related Bacteria is Present in this sample, with an estimated population of 9,000 cfu/ml. We certify that the analyses performed for this report are accurate, and that the laboratory tests were conducted by methods approved by the u. S. Environmental Protection Agency or variations of these EPA methods . These test results are intended to be used for informational purposes only and may not be used for regulatory compliance . National Testing Laboratories, Ltd. NATIONAL TESTING LABORATORIES, LTD Page 2 of 2 3110'2015 2:10:35 PM Product: Iron Bacteria Sample; 852178 Co l o r a d o D e p a r t m e n t o f P u b l i c He a l t h a n d E n v i r o n m e n t La b o r a t o r y S e r v i c e s D i v i s i o n 81 0 0 L o w r y B o u l e v a r d De n v e r , C O 8 0 2 3 0 Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Laboratory Services Division Chemistry Laboratory (303) 692-3048 Microbiology Laboratory (303) 692-3490 Shock Chlorination of Wells and Water Systems Laboratory Services Division – (303) 692-3090 Fax: (303) 344-9989 http://www.cdphe.state.co.us/lr Chemistry Laboratory – (303) 692-3048 Microbiology Laboratory – (303) 692-3490 Bottle Order Line (menu driven) – (303) 692-3074 Glossary Contaminant: Any physical, chemical, biological, or radiological substance or matter that has an adverse effect on air, water, or soil. Disinfection: Killing a larger portion of the harmful and objectionable bacteria in water. Groundwater: Water that fills wells from aquifers (natural reservoirs below the earth’s surface). Resample: Any water sample taken after the initial sampling of a well. Sample: Water that is analyzed by a laboratory for the presence of drinking water contaminants. Shock chlorination: Adding chlorine to water for the purpose of disinfection or other biological or chemical results. Well: An artificial excavation constructed for the pur-pose of exploring for or producing ground water. CAUTION •During the seven- to 13-hour procedure, purchase water for drinking, cooking and laundr y. Do not use well water for drinking or cooking while chlorine level is exceptionally strong. •All concentrated chlorine solutions are corrosive and care should be taken to avoid splashing them onto skin or into eyes. Skin areas or eyes contacted by the disinfection solution should be flushed im- mediately with clean water. •Never mix chlorine solutions with com- pounds containing acids or ammonia to improve their cleaning ability because toxic gases will form. Determining Amount of Chlorination for Your Well Table I Casing Diameter (Inches) Gallons of Water in 1 Foot of Casing Casing Diameter (Inches) Gallons of Water in 1 Foot of Casing 2 0.16 18 13.21 4 0.65 24 23.50 5 1.02 30 36.72 6 1.47 36 52.87 8 2.61 42 71.97 10 4.08 48 94.00 12 5.88 Table II Gallons of Water in Well Laundry Bleach Chlorinated Lime High Test Hypochlo-rite 5 5.5 oz. 1.2 oz..5 oz. 50 56 oz. 12 oz.4 oz. 100 112 oz. 24 oz.8 oz. 150 168 oz. 36 oz.12 oz. 200 224 oz. 48 oz.16 oz. 300 336 oz. 72 oz.24 oz. Each addtional 100 gallons add:112 oz.24 oz 8 oz. Bacterial contamination of well water can come from many sources. The most common include repair- ing the pump or casing without follow-up chlorina- tion, surface water entering pump or casing, poor construction of the well, or leaks in the well or well casing. Shock chlorination of the well may eliminate the bac- terial contamination, but well rehabilitation may be necessary if contamination continues to occur (as in a rusted or leaking casing). To determine the amount of chlorine needed to shock chlorinate your well, first determine the approximate volume of water contained in your well. Determine the volume of water in your well by multiplying the depth of your well times the amount of water in one foot of casing (Table I). Well Depth x Gallons of Water in 1 Foot of Casing (see Table I) = Volume of Water in Well Once you have determined the volume of water in your well, refer to Table II to determine the amount of chlorine compound required to shock chlorinate your well. Forms of Chlorine Used in Shock Chlorination Format Chemical Mixture Liquid Laundry Bleach (Sodium Hypochlorite, 5.25%) Powder or Tablet Form Chlorinated Lime (Chloride of Lime, 25-30%) Powder or Tablet Form High-Test Hypochlorate (Calcium Hypochlorite, 65-75 %) Treatment of Casing and Drop Pipe During the shock chlorination process it is necessary to thoroughly wet down the inside of the well casing and drop pipe. This can be accomplished by one of the three methods mentioned below: •If liquid bleach is used, mix the recommended amount (Table II) to at least 10 gallons of water. Pour down the inside of the casing, thoroughly wetting down everything inside the casing. •If powdered or tablet chlorine is used, dissolve the recommended amount (Table II) in a small quantity of water, then add the clear solution to a larger quantity of water (at least 20 gallons). Pour this solution into the casing, thoroughly wetting down everything inside the casing. CAUTION • Do not flush more than 100 gallons of chlorinated water from the system into the septic system. • Avoid draining heavily chlorinated water to lawns and do not allow puddles to form. • Do not chlorinate carbon or charcoal filters because this will deplete their capacity. •If a hose will extend from a nearby hydrant or faucet to the well casing, pour the recommend- ed amounts of chlorine (Table II) into the cas- ing and wash down the inside of the casing with the hose. Make sure the chlorine solution in the well is coming through the hose during the wash-down procedure. Pumping the solution into the casing will help to mix the chlorine solution with the standing water in the well. Once the chlorine is thoroughly mixed with the water in the well casing, allow it to stand for about six to12 hours. At the end of the six- to12-hour period, all faucets should be allowed to run until a strong odor of chlorine is observed at each faucet, then turn off the faucets and allow the water to stand in the pipes for one hour. Flushing the System Begin flushing the system by running all outside fau- cets until you no longer smell chlorine. Run this water into the street or onto an area where there is no lawn or flowers, such as a rocked area. You may severely damage lawns, landscape plantings, flowers or septic tanks with heavily chlorinated water. Once you have removed most of the chorine at the outside faucets, go into the house and run all inside faucets. If you have a septic tank or leaching field, you may want to dechlorinate the water at the drain by using approximately two (2) ounces of sodium bisulfite for every gallon run. Sodium bisulfite can be purchased at hardware stores. Hot water heaters should be drained after a well is treated with chlorine. If possible, run a hose from the water heater outside to an area that does not contain lawn or other sensitive plants. An Employee-Owned Company 1517 Blake Avenue, Suite 101 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Telephone (970) 945-8676 Fax (970) 945-2555 Land Surveying Civil Engineering June 12, 2015 Chris Hale, P.E. Mountain Cross Engineering, Inc. 826 ½ Grand Avenue Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone 970-945-5544, Fax 970-945-5558 Re: Review of Minor Subdivision & Major Impact Applications: MISA 8259 & MIPA 8260 High Country Engineering, Inc. (HCE) has received your emailed comments dated May 19, 2015 for the Minor Subdivision Application and the Major Impact Application for Eastbank LLC and Federal Express. A point by point response to your email comments is located below. Your comments have are italicized and the HCE response is below the comment in bold text. We have revised the site plan as a result of school district requests to have a 60’ access corridor along the northeast side of the COMMENTS AND CORRECTIONS In order for the Engineering Department to approve the resubmitted plans for Eastbank LLC and Federal Express, the following issues need to be addressed. MINOR SUBDIVISION APPLICATION PLANS, MISA-8259, SHALL INCLUDE: 1. The water quality reports for the existing and the new wells did not have results for coliform. The Applicant should provide these result. The results will be provided when available. 2. The proposed Lot 3 well has not been constructed or tested. The Applicant should provide results of the pump and water quality tests. This well will be drilled upon final approval by the County, which has been indicated to be acceptable by County Planning. 3. The Traffic Study that was provided addresses the impacts from the Federal Express facility. Traffic from the proposed single-family house was not included. The Applicant should address if the increased traffic from this additional use would adversely change the results of the Traffic Study. This lot has been proposed to require additional access review upon any new development and therefore will not generate any new traffic. Eastbank LLC & Federal Express Page 2 4. The application materials only address detention for the FedEx facility. The Applicant should discuss what is proposed for detention for the other Lots of the proposed subdivision. We have added additional text to the drainage study which indicates that if single family development occurs on Lot 2 or Lot 3 it would likely be such that there would be a decrease in runoff due to the landscaping that would occur around the new development. Additionally the lots abut the roaring fork river and any peak flow would be released to the river well before any peak occurring on the Roaring Fork River. 5. The existing driveway access for Lot 2 is proposed to be used for Lot 3. This access does not meet County standards and has grades of 13.28% at the intersection. The Applicant should provide alternate design to comply with County Road Standards. A revised design has been prepared for the existing driveway access for Lot 2 and Lot 3 will be asking for a waiver due to the limitation on development noted in the plat notes. 6. There appears to be existing irrigation ditches on site. The Applicant should address what is to be done with these ditches and the irrigation water. The irrigation ditches and rights will remain in use on the property and will be managed and owned by Eastbank, LLC. See revision in Utility report. MAJOR IMPACT APPLICATION PLANS, MIPA-8260, SHALL INCLUDE: 7. The Applicant will need to provide a Driveway permit from Garfield County. Acknowledged. 8. The proposed FedEx driveway intersection with CR154 is listed as 7.91%. Garfield County driveway permits required 3% for 30’. The Applicant should revise the design to comply with County standards. The Fedex driveway has been revised to meet the County Driveway standards. 9. The Grates for some of the area inlets are below the proposed weir spillway elevation. This will create a situation where the piping and inlets will surcharge and create areas of ponding within the proposed site. The Applicant should verify the detention pond elevations with the proposed inlet elevations and revise as necessary. The grading and drainage plan has been revised with the new layout and overflow elevations of the pond do not surcharge above any of the inlets piping may surcharge in larger storm events but will not surcharge above the inlets. 10. The RFSD site is proposed to access CR154 somewhere between the existing Lot 2/Lot 3 access and the proposed FedEx access. It is understood that some negotiations have already begun for providing an easement for this access. The Traffic Study for this application shows only small impacts to the existing road queueing and levels of service Eastbank LLC & Federal Express Page 2 from the FedEx facility. This is likely not the case with a third access for a large traffic generator, such as a proposed school. Provisions should be made to allow the proposed access to be combined to a future access to the south that would likely provide better sight distance, allow more room for turn lanes, and provide longer queue lengths. County Road and Bridge has reviewed our access points and determined at this time that they are in the best location. If future development justifies access adjustments, they will occur at that time. Per our revised site plan we have made adjustments to facilitate the ability for the school district to keep several different access options open for future planning and development. We believe that the comments have been addressed and completed to the best of our knowledge and it is not anticipated that there will be further comments. Please let us know if you need any more information or have questions regarding Eastbank LLC and FedEx plans. Thank You, Roger Neal, P.E. Principal TITLE COMMITMENT TRANSMITTAL TO: Roxanne Q. Linscomb Chicago Title Insurance Company 5501 LBJ Freeway, Suite 200 Dallas, TX 75240 COPIES TO: Thank you for choosing Advanced Title Company for this transaction. We are delivering the following to you with copies to the captioned parties. CHARGES: Title Commitment Tax Certificate(s) □ Affidavit for debts, liens, etc. □ Other MESSAGE: 618 Rood Avenue Grand Junction, CO 81501 970.255.7677 ph 970.255.6491 fax www.advancedtitleco.com Date: Order No. Property: Parties: Tax Parcel: April 17, 2015 51280 Colorado State Highway 82, Glenwood Springs, CO 81601/Part of the S1/2 of Section 35, T6S, R89W Eastbank, LLC, Elizabeth MacGregor Irrevocable Trust dated December 27, 2000 and Flora MacGregor Irrevocable Trust dated December 27, 2000/ KW Glenwood Springs, LLC Part of 2185-353-04-001 Owner’s Policy Extended Coverage Tax Certificate(s) Lender’s Policy Endorsements: $2,512.00 $65.00 $15.00 $ $ ALTA Commitment Form COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE Issued by STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY, a Texas Corporation (“Company”), for a valuable consideration, commits to issue its policy or policies of title insurance, as identif ied in Schedule A, in favor of the Proposed Insured named in Schedule A, as owner or mortgagee of the estate or interest in the land described or referred to in Schedule A, upon payment of the premiums and charges and compliance with the Require - ments; all subject to the provisions of Schedules A and B and to the Conditions of this Commitment. This Commitment shall be effective only when the identity of the Proposed Insured and the amount of the policy or policies committed for have been inserted in Schedul e A by the Company. All liability and obligation under this Commitment shall cease and terminate six months after the Effective Date or when the policy or policies committed for shall issue, whichever first occurs, provided that the failure to issue the po licy or policies is not the fault of the Company. The Company will provide a sample of the Commitment upon request . This Commitment shall not be valid or binding until countersigned by a validating officer or authorized sign atory. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Stewart Title Guaranty Company has caused its corporate name and seal to be affixed by its duly authorized officers on the date shown in Schedule A. Countersigned: Authorized Countersignature Advanced Title Company Company Grand Junction, Colorado City, State ALTA Commitment (6/17/06 004-UN ALTA Commitment (6/17/06 Page 2 CONDITIONS 1. The term mortgage, when used herein, shall include deed of trust, trust deed, or other security instrument. 2. If the proposed Insured has or acquires actual knowledge of any defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter affecting the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment other than those shown in Schedule B hereof, and shall fail to disclose such knowledge to the Company in writing, the Company shall be relieved from liability for any loss or damage resulting from any act of reliance hereon to the extent the Company is prejudiced by failure to so disclose such knowledge. If the proposed Insured shall disclose such knowledge to the Company, or if the Company otherwise acquires actual knowledge of any such defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter, the Company at its option may amend Schedule B of this Commitment accordingly, but such amendment shall not relieve the Company from liability previously incurred pursuant to paragraph 3 of these Conditions and Stipulations. 3. Liability of the Company under this Commitment shall be only to the named proposed Insured and such parties included under the definition of Insured in the form of policy or policies committed for and only for actual loss incurred in reliance hereon in undertaking in good faith (a) to comply with the requirements hereof, or (b) to eliminate exceptions shown in Schedule B, or (c) to acquire or create the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. In no event shall such liability exceed the amount stated in Schedule A for the policy or policies committed for and such liability is subject to the insuring provisions and Conditions and Stipulations and the Exclusions from Coverage of the form of policy or policies committed for in favor of the proposed Insured which are hereby incorporated by reference and are made a part of this Commitment except as expressly modified herein. 4. This Commitment is a contract to issue one or more title insurance policies and is not an abstract of title or a report of the condition of title. Any action or actions or rights of action that the proposed Insured may have or may bring against the Company arising out of the status of the title to the estate or interest or the status of the mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment must be based on and are subject to the provisions of this Commitment. 5. The policy to be issued contains an arbitration clause. All arbitrable matters when the Amount of Insurance is $2,000,000 or less shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Insured as the exclusive remedy of the parties. You may review a copy of the arbitration rules at<http://www.alta.org/>. All notices required to be given the Company and any statement in writing required to be furnished the Company shall be addressed to it at P.O. Box 2029, Houston, Texas 77252. Copyright 2006-2009 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under li cense from the American Land Title Association. File No. 51280 Countersigned: Advanced Title Company Statement of Charges: These charges are due and payable before a Policy can be issued: Policy $2,254.00 Tax Certificate(s) $15.00 By: Authorized Signatory This policy valid only if Schedule B is attached ALTA Commitment (6/17/06) COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE SCHEDULE A 1. Effective Date: March 19, 2015 at 7:30 am 2. Policy or Policies to be issued: Amount (a) ALTA Owner's Policy (6-17-06) Proposed Insured: $ 1,012,500.00 KW Glenwood Springs, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company (b) Proposed Insured: $ 3. The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment is FEE SIMPLE. 4. Title to the FEE estate or interest in the land is at the effective date hereof vested in: Eastbank, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, Elizabeth MacGregor Irrevocable Trust dated December 27, 2000 and Flora MacGregor Irrevocable Trust dated December 27, 2000, as their interest may appear. 5. The land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows: See Schedule A (continued) Copyright 2006-2009 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of u se. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. File No. 51280 COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE SCHEDULE A (continued) ALTA Commitment (6/17/06) LEGAL DESCRIPTION Parcel 2A, EASTBANK PARCEL 2 LOT SPLIT, according to the plat thereof filed January 18, 2012 at Reception No. 813402 County of Garfield, State of Colorado NOTE: The exact legal description is to be based on a survey of subject Land. Additional Exceptions may result. For identification purposes only; Part of Parcel No. 2185-353-04-001 Copyright 2006-2009 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. File No. 51280 ALTA Commitment (6/17/06) COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE SCHEDULE B PART I The following requirements must be met: 1. Instruments in insurable form, which must be executed, delivered and duly filed for record: a. Deed from Eastbank, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, Elizabeth MacGregor Irrevocable Trust dated December 27, 2000 and Flora MacGregor Irrevocable Trust dated December 27, 2000 to KW Glenwood Springs, an Arizona limited liability company. NOTE: Statement of Authority for Eastbank, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company recorded January 18, 2012 at Reception No. 813404 discloses the following name(s) of the parties authorized for said company and otherwise complying with Colorado Revised Statutes 38-30-172: Robert Duncan MacGregor, President of Dunrene Management, Inc., a Colorado corporation, Manager of Eastbank, LLC. NOTE: Statement of Authority for Dunrene Management, Inc. recorded June 30, 2009 at Reception No. 770437 discloses the following name(s) of the parties authorized for said company and otherwise complying with Colo rado Revised Statutes 38-30-172: Robert Duncan MacGregor, President of Dunrene Management, Inc., a Colorado corporation. NOTE: Statement of Authority for Elizabeth MacGregor Irre vocable Trust dated December 27, 2000 recorded June 30, 2009 at Reception No. 770439 discloses the following name(s) of the parties authorized for said comp any and otherwise complying with Colorado Revised Statutes 38-30-172: Steven M. Marolt, Trustee. NOTE: Statement of Authority for Flora MacGregor Irrevocable Trust dated December 27, 2000 recorded June 30, 2009 at Reception No. 770440 discloses the following name(s) of the parties authorized for said company and otherwise complying with Colorado Revised Statutes 38-30-172: Steven M. Marolt, Trustee. 2. You must tell us in writing the name of anyone not referred to in this Commitment who will get an interest in the land or who will make a loan on the land. We may then make additional requirements or exceptions. 3. Payment of all taxes and assessments, levied and assessed against subject premises, which are due and payable. County Parcel Number: Part of 2185-353-04-001. Tax Certificate. 4. Affidavit as to debts, liens, and other matters from the owner in a form acceptable to the Title Company. 5. ALTA/ACSM Land Title Survey in accordance with the 2011 Minimum Standard Detail Requirements must be submitted to the Company for review and approval. Additional Requirements and/or Exceptions may result. Copyright 2006-2009 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. File No. 51280 ALTA Commitment (6/17/06) COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE SCHEDULE B – PART II Schedule B of the policy or policies to be issued will contain excep tions to the following matters unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company. 1. Rights or claims of parties in possession, not shown of public record. 2. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public record. 3. Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse circumstance affecting the title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land and not shown by the public records. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 5. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, f irst appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the Effective Date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires for value of record the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. NOTE: Exceptions 1 through 5 will not appear on the policy(ies) to be issued hereunder once all Schedule B – Part I Requirements have been satisfied and the Company closes the transaction. 6. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) Minerals of whatsoever kind, subsurface and surface substances, in, on, under and that may be produced from the Land, together with all rights, privileges, and immunities relating thereto, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b) or (c) are shown by the Public Records or listed in Schedule B. 7. Water rights, claims or title to water. 8. Taxes or special assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the public records. 9. Taxes for the year 2015, and subsequent years; special assessments or charges not certified to the County Treasurer. Tax ID Number: Part of 2185-353-04-001 10. Reservations and exceptions in Patents, or Acts authorizing the issuance thereof, including the reservations of the right of way for ditches or canals constructed by the authority of the United States, as reserved in United States Patent recorded May 20, 1899 at Reception No. 21746. 11. Reservations and exceptions in Patents, or Acts authorizing the issuance thereof, including the reservations of the right of proprietor of a vein or lode to extract and remove his ore therefrom should the same be found to penetrate or intersect the premises as reserved in United States Patent recorded May 20, 1899 at Reception No. 21746. 12. Easements granted to The Mountain States Telephone and Telegraph Company by instrument recorded August 29, 1929 at Reception No. 105227, and by instrument recorded July 13, 1931 at Reception No. 110547. 13. Easement granted to The Mountain States Telephone and Telegraph Company by instrument recorded October 29, 1964 at Reception No. 227425. Copyright 2006-2009 American Land Title Association. Al l rights reserved. The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. File No. 51280 COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE SCHEDULE B – PART II (continued) ALTA Commitment (6/17/06) 14. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations as contained in Garfield County Resolution 81 - 387 recorded December 22, 1981 at Reception No. 322946. 15. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations as contained in Garfield County Resolution 83 - 122 recorded May 17, 1983 at Reception No. 342137. 16. Easement for Water Line granted to Leo Jammaron by instrument recorded February 15, 1985 at Reception No. 359483. 17. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations as contained in Garfield County Resolution 97 - 92 recorded October 7, 1997 at Reception No. 514786. 18. (Intentionally Omitted). 19. Agriculture Encroachment License with The Roaring Fork Transportation Authority as set forth by instrument recorded August 22, 2005 at Reception No. 680632. 20. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations of Lease from Eastbank, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, Elizabeth MacGregor Irrevocable Trust dated December 27, 2000, a Colorado trust and Flora MacGregor Irrevocable Trust dated December 27, 2000, a Colorado trust, as Landlord, and KW Glenwood Springs, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company as evidenced in Memorandum of Lease recorded March 17, 2015 at Reception No. 860458. File Number: 51280 CO Commitment Disclosure DISCLOSURES Order No.: 51280 Pursuant to C.R.S. 10-11-122, notice is hereby given that: (A) THE SUBJECT REAL PROPERTY MAY BE LOCATED IN A SPECIAL TAXING DISTRICT; (B) A CERTIFICATE OF TAXES DUE LISTING EACH TAXING JURISDICTION SHALL BE OBTAINED FROM THE COUNTY TREASURER OR THE COUNTY TREASURER’S AUTHORIZED AGENT; (C) INFORMATION REGARDING SPECIAL DISTRICTS AND THE BOUNDARIES OF SUCH DISTRICTS MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, THE COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER, OR THE COUNTY ASSESSOR Note: Colorado Division of Insurance Regulations 3-5-1, Paragraph C of Article VII requires that “Every title entity shall be responsible for all matters which appear of record prior to the time of recording whenever the title entity conducts the closing and is responsible for recording or filing of legal documents resulting from the transaction which was closed.” Provided that Advanced Title Company conducts the closing of the insured transaction and is responsible for recording the legal documents from the transaction, exception number 5 will not appear on the Owner’s Title Policy and the Lender’s Title Policy when issued. Note: Affirmative Mechanic’s Lien Protection for the Owner may be available (typically by deletion of Exception No. 4 of Schedule B, Section 2 of the Commitment from the Owner’s Policy to be issued) upon compliance with the following conditions: A. The land described in Schedule A of this commitment must be a single-family residence, which includes a condominium or townhouse unit. B. No labor or materials have been furnished by mechanics or materialmen for purposes of construction on the land described in Schedule A of this Commitment within the past 6 months. C. The Company must receive an appropriate affidavit indemnifying the Company against unfiled Mechanic’s and Materialmen’s Liens. D. The Company must receive payment of the appropriate premium. E. If there has been construction, improvements or major repairs undertaken on the property to be purchased, within six months prior to the Date of the Commitment, the requirements to obtain coverage for unrecorded liens will include: disclosure of certain construction information; financial information as to the seller, the builder and/or the contractor; payment of the appropriate premium; fully executed Indemnity agreements satisfactory to the company; and, any additional requirements as may be necessary after an examination of the aforesaid information by the Company. No coverage will be given under any circumstances for labor or material for which the insured has contracted for or agreed to pay. To comply with the provisions of C.R.S. 10-11-123, the Company makes the following disclosure: (a) That there is recorded evidence that a mineral estate has been severed, leased or otherwise conveyed from the surface estate and that there is a substantial likelihood that a third party holds some or all interest in oil, gas, other minerals, or geothermal energy in the property; and (b) That such mineral estate may include the right to enter and use the property without the surface owner’s permission. NOTE: THIS DISCLOSURE APPLIES ONLY IF SCHEDULE B, SECTION 2 OF THE TITLE COMMITMENT HEREIN INCLUDES AN EXCEPTION FOR SEVERED MINERALS. NOTHING HEREIN CONTAINED WILL BE DEEMED TO OBLIGATE THE COMPANY TO PROVIDE ANY OF THE COVERAGES REFERRED TO HEREIN, UNLESS THE ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE FULLY SATISFIED. File No.: 51280 STG Privacy Notice 1 (Rev 01/26/09) Stewart Title Companies WHAT DO THE STEWART TITLE COMPANIES DO WITH YOUR PERSONAL INFORMATION? Federal and applicable state law and regulations give consumers the right to limit some but not all sharing. Federal and applicable state law regulations also require us to tell you how we collect, share, and protect your personal information. Please read this notice carefully to understand how we use your personal information. This privacy notice is distributed on behalf of the Stewart Title Guaranty Company and its affiliates (the Stewart Title Companies), pursuant to Title V of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA). The types of personal information we collect and share depend on the product or service that you have sought through us. This information can include social security numbers and driver's license number. All financial companies, such as the Stewart Title Companies, need to share customers' personal information to run their everyday business—to process transactions and maintain customer accounts. In the section below, we list the reasons that we can share customers' personal information; the reasons that we choose to share; and whether you can limit this sharing. Reasons we can share your personal information Do we share? Can you limit this sharing? For our everyday business purposes — to process your transactions and maintain your account. This may include running the business and managing customer accounts, such as processing transactions, mailing, and auditing services, and responding to court orders and legal investigations. Yes No For our marketing purposes — to offer our products and services to you. Yes No For joint marketing with other financial companies No We don't share For our affiliates' everyday business purposes — information about your transactions and experiences. Affiliates are companies related by common ownership or control. They can be financial and nonfinancial companies. Our affiliates may include companies with a Stewart name; financial companies, such as Stewart Title Company Yes No For our affiliates' everyday business purposes — information about your creditworthiness. No We don't share For our affiliates to market to you Yes No For nonaffiliates to market to you. Nonaffiliates are companies not related by common ownership or control. They can be financial and nonfinancial companies. No We don't share We may disclose your personal information to our affiliates or to nonaffiliates as permitted by law. If you request a transaction with a nonaffiliate, such as a third party insurance company, we will disclose your personal information to that nonaffiliate. [We do not control their subsequent use of information, and suggest you refer to their privacy notices.] Sharing practices How often do the Stewart Title Companies notify me about their practices? We must notify you about our sharing practices when you r equest a transaction. How do the Stewart Title Companies protect my personal information? To protect your personal information from unauthorized access and use, we use security measures that comply with federal and state law. These measures include computer, file, and building safeguards. How do the Stewart Title Companies collect my personal information? We collect your personal information, for example, when you • request insurance-related services • provide such information to us We also collect your personal information from others, such as the real estate agent or lender involved in your transaction, credit reporting agencies, affiliates or other companies. What sharing can I limit? Although federal and state law give you the right to limit sharing (e.g., opt out) in certain instances, we do not share your personal information in those instances. Contact Us If you have any questions about this privacy notice, please contact us at: Stewart Title Guaranty Company, 1980 Post Oak Blvd., Privacy Officer, Houston, Texas 77056 STG Privacy Notice 2 (Rev 01/26/09) Independent Agencies and Unaffiliated Escrow Agents File No.: 51280 WHAT DOES THE ADVANCED TITLE COMPANY DO WITH YOUR PERSONAL INFORMATION? Federal and applicable state law and regulations give consumers the right to limit some but not all sharing. Federal and applicable state law regulations also require us to tell you how we collect, share, and protect your personal information. Please read this notice carefully to understand how we use your personal information. This privacy notice is distributed on behalf of Advanced Title Company and its affiliates (“ N/A ”), pursuant to Title V of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA). The types of personal information we collect and share depend on the product or service that you have sought through us. This information can include social security numbers and driver's license number. All financial companies, such as _____________, need to share customers' personal information to run their everyday business - to process transactions and maintain customer accounts. In the section below, we list the reasons that we can shar e customers' personal information; the reasons that we choose to share; and whether you can limit this sharing. Reasons we can share your personal information Do we share? Can you limit this sharing? For our everyday business purposes - to process your transactions and maintain your account. This may include running the business and managing customer accounts, such as processing transactions, mailing, and auditing services, and responding to court orders and legal investigations. Yes No For our marketing purposes - to offer our products and services to you. Yes No For joint marketing with other financial companies No We don't share For our affiliates' everyday business purposes - information about your transactions and experiences. Affiliates are companies related by common ownership or control. They can be financial and nonfinancial companies. Yes No For our affiliates' everyday business purposes - information about your creditworthiness. No We don't share For our affiliates to market to you Yes No For nonaffiliates to market to you. Nonaffiliates are companies not related by common ownership or control. They can be financial and nonfinancial companies. No We don't share We may disclose your personal information to our affiliates or to nonaffiliates as permitted by law. If you request a transaction with a nonaffiliate, such as a third party insurance company, we will disclose your personal information to that nonaffiliate. [We do not control their subsequent use of information, and suggest you refer to their privacy notices.] Sharing practices How often do/does Advanced Title Company notify me about their practices? We must notify you about our sharing practices when you request a transaction. How do/does Advanced Title Company protect my personal information? To protect your personal information from unauthorized access and use, we use security measures that comply with federal and state law. These measures include computer, file, and building safeguards. How do/does Advanced Title Company collect my personal information? We collect your personal information, for example, when you • request insurance-related services • provide such information to us We also collect your personal information from others, such as the real estate agent or lender involved in your transaction, credit reporting agencies, affiliates or other companies. What sharing can I limit? Although federal and state law give you the right to limit sharing (e.g., opt out) in certain instances, we do not share your personal information in those instances. Contact Us If you have any questions about this privacy notice, please contact us at: 622 Rood Avenue Grand Junction, CO 81501 ; 970-255-7677 EASTBANK MINOR SUBDIVISION & MAJOR IMPACT REVIEW UTILITY REPORT PREPARED FOR: EASTBANK, LLC 710 East Durant Avenue, W-6 Aspen, CO 81611 KW GLENWOOD SPRINGS, LLC P.O. BOX 979 TELLURIDE, CO 81435 Prepared By: HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC. 1517 Blake Avenue, Suite 101 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 (970) 945-8676 HCE Project No. 2151005.00 June 12, 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS FIGURES Vicinity Map ………………………………………………………….…………………..2 INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................3 Location .....................................................................................................................3 Existing Land Use ......................................................................................................3 WASTEWATER SYSTEM .................................................................................................3 Sanitary Sewer System ..............................................................................................3 Local Sanitary Sewer System ....................................................................................3 WATER DISTRIBUTION ..................................................................................................4 Water Distribution ....................................................................................................4 System Demand .........................................................................................................4 System Requirements.................................................................................................5 Fire Demand...............................................................................................................5 RAW WATER IRRIGATION ............................................................................................6 DRY UTILITIES………..………………………………………………….………..……6 Electric/Gas ...............................................................................................................6 Cable ..........................................................................................................................7 Telecomunications .....................................................................................................7 CONCLUSION ....................................................................................................................8 Water and Sewer .......................................................................................................8 Dry Utilities ...............................................................................................................8 REFERENCES ....................................................................................................................8 APPENDICES Appendix A Diesel Pump Specifications Appendix B Water Tank Specifications Appendix C Will Serve Letters Appendix D OWTS System Plan Fedex 2 3 INTRODUCTION Location The 38.2-acre Eastbank subdivision is a proposed development that consists of residential, and industrial use. The site is located in Section 35 of Township 6 South, Range 89 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, Garfield County Colorado. The project is bounded to the north by private properties, on the south by private property and the Roaring Fork River, on the east by RFTA right-of-way and County Road 154, and to the west by private property. State Highway 82 is located adjacent to County Road 154 to the east and access is approximately 800-ft on County Road 154 to Highway 82. Existing Land Use The project site consists of undeveloped land for Lots 1 and 3 and an existing trash waste bin storage facility (Intermountain Waste and Recycling Inc.) on Lot 2. Lots 1 and 3 are undeveloped land and currently have minimal use and are covered with grasses and sagebrush. WASTEWATER SYSTEM Sanitary Sewer System This area is located south of the city of Glenwood Springs and approximately 7200-ft to a city sewer line. South of this development, the closest sewer system would be Ironbridge which is across the river and approximately 6,000-ft away. With that in mind, it is not feasible to tie into an existing sewer system. Local Sanitary Sewer System The three lots proposed for the Eastbank Subdivision are proposed to be served with individual onsite wastewater treatment systems. The geotechnical engineer has indicated that the soils are sandy clays and the percolation tests indicate a typical system will be acceptable for typical onsite sewage flows. The existing and proposed development has and will have minimal system flows. The uses and system for each lot are: 4 1. Lot 1 3.848 will have a FedEx transport facility which will have 58 fixture units or an estimated 54 GPM peak flow and 650 GPD use. With these design parameters, the system will require a 1,500-gallon septic tank and 105 Quick 4 infiltrators in a trench configuration. The site has sufficient area for this system. 2. Lot 2 is currently a waste and recycling operation (InterMountain Waste & Recycling LLC) located at 3927 County Road 154. The lot is proposed to be 17.42 acres and currently has minimal wastewater usage. Estimated use 300-500 gallons per day, which is accommodated by an existing on-site wastewater treatment system, which is in good operation. 3. Lot 3 will be a new single-family lot. Effluent flows are estimated to be 1,000-2,000 gallons per day. This lot is 16.9+/- acres and will easily have the ability to construct a standard septic system within the lot. WATER DISTRIBUTION Water Distribution The proposed Eastbank Minor Subdivision will have three lots that will all be served by individual wells. There currently is one well that has been drilled and been in operation for many years on Lot 2. A new well has been drilled on Lot 1 and Lot 3 and will have a well drilled once subdivision approval has been completed. Both of the currently existing wells produce sufficient water and have sufficient water quality to meet the current county and state guidelines for public use. Attached to the submittal is a report prepared by Resource Engineering under “Water Supply Information”, discussing the proposed water wells both legal and physical. System Demand The single-family lots assuming the presence of 3.5 people per single-family unit with a per capita demand of 100-gallons per day (1 EQR=350 GPD) will require the average daily demand of 350 gallons per day. This includes Lot 2 and Lot 3. These lots will be served 5 from their own well. Lot 2 has a historic well that produces in excess of 20 GPM and meets all current state guidelines for water quality. A report from Resource Engineering under section Water Supply information includes specifics. The FedEx facility will have 28 fixture units and a peak flow of 41 GPM. Total average day usage will only be 750 GPD. Lot 1 the FedEx Facility has a newly drilled well that produces 12 GPM. System Requirements Each lot will regulate their own water system flows, pressure and storage requirements. Lot 1 The newly drilled well on Lot 1 that produces 12 GPM will be able to meet daily demands as well as provide storage for fire flows. This well flow will be pumped to the pump house treated with chlorine injection and pumped into a 120-gallon pressure tank for chlorine contact before entering the potable system. Lot 1 will include 6-inch and 10-inch diameter PVC C900 Class 250 pipe, a 120-gallon small pressure tank, a chlorine injection pump, a 200,000-gallon fire storage tank and a diesel fire pump. Lots 2 and 3 Each single-family unit shall connect to its own well and utilize the well based on the individual needs and building permit requirements. Lot 2 well is an existing well producing in excess of 20 GPM and historically has met the needs of this lot for many years. Lot 3 will be drilled upon plat approval. Fire Demand Fire demands will be provided by each lot and will be required to meet fire requirements at time of building permit with their own onsite storage system. Lot 1 fire demands, according to the 2009 International Fire Code (IFC), indicate the 6 proposed FedEx structure (which will be a Type IIB building that is 26,795 square feet and requires a fire flow of 3,500 GPM for 3 hours) can be reduced per the code up to 75%, if the building is provided with an internal sprinkler system. With a 75% reduction, the minimum flow would be 875 GPM. The sprinkler system demand, which is attached, indicates that 867.4 GPM in the most remote zone would be required for 90 minutes. We have assumed for storage purposes, two zones for 90 minutes plus a 500 GPM hose flow. This yields a flow of 867.4 GPM (1st zone), 755.8 GPM (2nd zone), and 500 GPM hose flow or 2123.2 GPM for 90 minutes. This totals 191,088 gallons. We are proposing a 200,000-gallon tank with a 2500 GPM diesel fire pump at 100psi. Code indicates that for up to 2250 GPM, two hydrants should be provided with a maximum distance of 225-feet from point on street to hydrant. All fire hydrants, valves and other appurtenances shall be constructed in accordance to the Garfield County and local fire district regulations. RAW WATER IRRIGATION No raw water irrigation is proposed for this subdivision. The domestic well for Lot 1 is approved for 15,450 sf of irrigation rights that is available for outside irrigation use. In general terms the Glenwood Ditch that runs off-site along the northeast side of the properties is owned by a formal, incorporated Ditch Company. Eastbank owns shares in that Ditch Company and has certain surface use water rights for irrigation and related activity. On site “ditches” are historic lateral conveyances and generally subject to relocation. This development and subdivision does not impact any active irrigation conveyances. DRY UTILITIES Electric/Gas The point of contact for electrical service is Sam Wakefield with Xcel Energy (970-244- 2622). There is a three-phase overhead electrical feeder that is currently on Lot 2 and is available to service the site. The feeder is located on the existing site as an overhead feed and currently 7 feeds Lot 2. We are proposing a new 3-phase overhead line to cross County Road 154 to the proposed lot 1 that will serve the new FedEx facility. This line will come onto the property overhead and then run underground to the FedEx building. Lot 3 will be served off of an underground line located northwest of the northern corner of the lot and will be connected with a 30-ft utility easement. The developer will be responsible for costs associated with extending the electric utility to Lot 1. Lot 3 will be responsible to provide electric utility service at the time of building permit since the location of the structure will be critical in extending the proper service to the building location. The proposed easements are shown on the utility plan. No gas service is currently adjacent to this property and no gas service is currently proposed. Any gas needs will be provided via propane tanks to be located on each lot, if required. Cable Currently Comcast Cable is located adjacent to Lot 2. The point of contact for Comcast Cable Television service is (800-266-2278). We are currently not anticipating extension of Comcast Cable. Cable television is currently available to the adjacent Lot 2, but is not proposed to be extended to Lots 1 and 3. Telecommunications The point of contact for Telecommunications service is Jason Sharpe with CenturyLink communications (970-309-2973). There is an existing pedestal located at the proposed lot line between Lots 1 and 2 at County Road 154. Jason Sharpe has indicated there is sufficient capacity for the proposed FedEx facility. A 25 pair line will be buried from this pedestal to Lot 1. Lot 2 currently has phone 8 service. It is not intended to extend service to lot three at this time, and if developed, will operate off of cellular service. The developer will be responsible for trenching and backfill to Lot 1. CenturyLink will provide and install the cable. The telephone lines will be laid in, as shown on the attached Master Utility plans. CONCLUSION Water and Sewer This utility report was prepared in compliance with the Garfield County standards and specifications. This report and the associated plans identifies the proposed water, sewer and dry utility layouts for the proposed three lots. The proposed onsite wastewater treatment systems will provide adequate capacity to serve the proposed residential and industrial development. The proposed well service for each lot will provide water service to meet the water demands and fire flows required when construction is anticipated on each lot. All lots will be required to meet building code requirements when constructing the final water system for each lot. Irrigation will also be provided via the well and each lot has been allocated square footage per the augmentation plan. Dry Utilities Dry utilities to service the site are already in place along County Road 154, and adjacent Lot 3 on the master utility plan. This includes electric to all lots, telephone to Lots 1 and 2, and cable TV to Lots 1 and 2. REFERENCES International Fire Code: International Code Council. International Conference of Building Officials, Whittier, CA, 2009. Uniform Building Code: International Conference of Building Officials. Whittier, CA, 2009. 9 APPENDIX A PORTLAND, OR. 503-688-1231 800-878-8055 / 503-688-1234 (fax) 2-24-2015 Quote # N/A DIESEL FIRE PUMP SYSTEM -Submittal- FED EX Garfield County ● PUMP LISTING: 2500 GPM @ 100 PSI BOOST DIESEL PACKAGE SUBMITTAL DATA SHEET ELECTRIC DRIVE QUOTE # N/A FED EX GARFIELD COUNTY DATE:2-24-2015 CONTRACTOR:TBD PUMP LISTED CONDITIONS:2500 GPM @ 100 PSI BOOST PUMP MODEL:AURORA 8-481-17B HORIZONTAL SPLIT CASE FLANGES:125 / 125 # DIESEL ENGINE:CLARKE JU6H-UFADW8 282HP, 1760RPM HOSE VALVE HEADER:N/A TANK DATA:320 GALLON - DOUBLE WALL MAIN CONTROLLER: METRON FD-4 120VAC/12VDC, 1PH JOCKEY PUMP:GOULDS G&L 2 SV 9 STAGE 3HP, 208V, 1PH JOCKEY CONTROLLER:METRON M15 DIGITAL 3HP, 208V, 1PH TEST METER:GERAND K 2500-8 GRV G P M @ P S I H P V P h a s e Pr o j e c t : Co n t r a c t o r : Da t e : P . O . : Fi r e P u m p : -A u r o r a 8 - 4 8 1 - 1 7 B Di e s e l E n g i n e : -C l a r k e J U 6 H - U F A D W 8 -2 8 2 H P , 1 7 6 0 R P M Co n t r o l s : -M e t r o n F D 4 Jo c k e y P u m p : -G o u l d s 2 S V - 9 S t a g e -3 H P , 2 0 8 V , 1 - P h a s e Jo c k e y C o n t r o l l e r : -M e t r o n M 1 5 D i g i t a l 25 0 0 10 0 28 2 1 2 0 1 Fe d E x G a r f i e l d C o u n t y Fe b 2 5 , 2 0 1 5 S u b m i t t a l De s i g n C o n d i t i o n s : Al l d i m e n s i o n s i n c h e s - N o t c e r t i f i e d f o r c o n s t r u c t i o n p u r p o s e s . Fe d E x G a r f i e l d C o u n t y TA L C O RE S I D E N T I A L & C O M M E R C I A L F I R E P U M P S P E C I A L I S T S 60 4 0 N E 1 1 2 T H A V E . P O R T L A N D , O R 9 7 2 2 0 PH O N E : 8 0 0 - 8 7 8 - 8 0 5 5 W W W . T A L C O F I R E . C O M FI R E SY S T E M S TB D 11 3 14 9 12 5 1 8 24 1 8 78 24 1 8 14 8 1 8 10 " S u c t i o n C o n n e c t i o n ( G r o o v e d ) 8" F l o w M e t e r R e t u r n ( G r o o v e d ) Fl o w M e t e r Di e s e l & J o c k e y C o n t r o l l e r S t a n d Di e s e l F i r e P u m p D r i v e r Sp l i t C a s e F i r e P u m p Mo n i t o r e d B u t t e r f l y V a l v e ( t y p i c a l ) Do u b l e W a l l D i e s e l F u e l T a n k 10 " D i s c h a r g e C o n n e c t i o n ( G r o o v e d ) Jo c k e y P u m p UL / FM DIESEL FIRE PUMP 2500 GPM AURORA PUMP FIRE PUMP LINE • UL Listed/FM Approved/NFPA-20 Design • Flows from 250 to 4500 GPM • Pressures from 75 to 387 PSI • For Commercial, Industrial and Marine Use • Special Materials for Seawater Applications • Diesel and Electric Driven • UL Listed/FM Approved/NFPA-20 Design • Flows from 250 to 5000 GPM • Pressures from 40 to 490 PSI • For Commercial and Industrial Use • Diesel and Electric Driven • UL Listed/FM approved Aurora fire pump • UL Listed/FM approved fire pump controller • ETL Listed packaged fire pump system • Aurora jockey pump • UL Listed jockey pump controller • Pressure sensing lines complete per NFPA 20 • Listed OS & Y gate & butterfly valves • Suction and discharge pressure gauges • Automatic casing air release valve • Casing pressure relief valve (electric packages) • Hose header with valves, caps & chains • Suction and discharge piping per NFPA 20 • All electrical components pre-wired at factory • Complete system hydrostatically tested Vertical Turbine Horizontal Split Case Packaged Fire Pump Systems • UL Listed/FM Approved/NFPA-20 Design • Flows from 50 to 750 GPM • Pressures from 40 to 205 PSI • For Commercial, Residential and Industrial Use • Space Saving Design • UL Listed/FM Approved/NFPA-20 Design • Flows from 250 to 2500 GPM • Pressures from 40 to 200 PSI • For Commercial and Industrial Use • Space Saving Design • UL Listed/FM Approved/NFPA-20 Design • Engines are Selected for the Customer’s Needs • Fuel Tank and Other Accessories are Available • For Commercial, Industrial and Marine Use Vertical Inline Vertical Split Case Diesel Engines Customer : Project name : Default Pump Performance Curve Encompass 2.0 - 15.0.0.0 0 80 160 240 320 Po w e r - h p 15.81 in 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000 He a d - p s i Ef f i c i e n c y - % Flow - USgpm 15.81 in Efficiency Preferred operating region Item number : 010 Size : 8-491-18A Service :Stages : 1 Quantity : 1 Driver type : Engine Quote number : 243627 Frequency : 0 Hz Date last saved : 24 Feb 2015 5:19 PM Speed, rated : 1,760 rpm Flow, rated : 2,500.0 USgpm Based on curve number : 194-8X12X18A-1770 Differential head / pressure, rated : 100.0 psi Efficiency : 78.35 % : Shutoff head : 121.0 psi : Suction pressure, max : 0.00 psi.g Power, maximum : 221 hp Products C1 For Gauges/Thermometers: For Electronic Products: For Diaphragm Seals: U.S. GAUGE PMT PRODUCTS M&G PRODUCTS 820 Pennsylvania Blvd. 820 Pennsylvania Blvd. 8600 Somerset Drive Feasterville, PA 19053 U.S.A. Feasterville, PA 19053 U.S.A. Largo, FL 33773 U.S.A. Tel: (215) 355-6900 Tel: (215) 355-6900 Tel: (727) 536-7831 Fax: (215) 354-1802 Fax: (215) 354-1800 Fax: (727) 539-6882 www.ametekusg.com www.ametekusg.com www.ametek.com/tci Customer Service Tel: (863) 534-1504 Customer Service Fax: (863) 533-7465 © 2006, by AMETEK, Inc. All rights reserved. PDF606 (160126) Specifications are subject to change without notice. Visit our Web sites for the most up-to-date information. For Gauges/Thermometers: For Electronic Products: For Diaphragm Seals: U.S. GAUGE PMT PRODUCTS M&G PRODUCTS 820 Pennsylvania Blvd. 820 Pennsylvania Blvd. 8600 Somerset Drive Feasterville, PA 19053 U.S.A. Feasterville, PA 19053 U.S.A. Largo, FL 33773 U.S.A. Tel: (215) 355-6900 Tel: (215) 355-6900 Tel: (727) 536-7831 Fax: (215) 354-1802 Fax: (215) 354-1800 Fax: (727) 539-6882 www.ametekusg.com www.ametekusg.com www.ametek.com/tci Customer Service Tel: (863) 534-1504 Customer Service Fax: (863) 533-7465 C1 General Purpose Gauges Series P-500 Low Cost Utility Gauges DESCRIPTION U.S. Gauge Series P-500 utility gauges provide economical, reliable service in a wide variety of applications including pumps, compressors, and other equipment. Series P-500 utility gauges come in English and metric ranges with accuracy of either ±3-2-3% or ±1.6% full scale. Gauges are available in 1-1/2”, 2”, 2-1/2”, 3-1/2”, and 4-1/2” steel cases with a choice of English or metric connections in center-back and lower mount configurations. SPECIFICATIONS RANGES: 30” Hg VAC through 0-5000 psi ACCURACY: ±3-2-3% (Grade B) or ±1.6% of span BOURDON TUBE: Phosphor bronze DIAL: ABS (aluminum optional) POINTER: Aluminum CASE: Painted steel CONNECTION: Brass, 1/8-27 NPT for 1-1/2” and 2”; 1/4-18 NPT for 2” through 4-1/2”; G1/8B, G1/4B, R1/8, R1/4, center-back or lower mount MODEL DIAL UNIT A B C E1 E2 F L NUMBER SIZE P-500 1-1/2”inches 1.64 .92 .34 .62 – .44 .55 mm 41.66 23.37 8.66 15.75 – 11.18 13.97 P-500 2”inches 2.16 1.15 .40 .84 .90 .55 .87 mm 54.86 29.21 10.16 21.34 22.86 13.97 22.10 P-505 2-1/2” LM inches 2.73 1.15 .39 .48 .25 .82 – mm 69.34 29.21 9.91 12.19 6.35 20.83 – P-505 2-1/2” CBM inches 2.49 1.21 1.22 – .28 .84 – mm 63.25 30.73 30.99 – 7.11 21.34 – P-505 3-1/2” LM inches 3.53 1.17 .40 – .24 .83 – mm 89.66 29.72 10.16 – 6.10 21.08 – P-505 4-1/2” LM inches 4.80 1.12 .38 – .45 1.10 – mm 121.92 28.45 9.65 – 11.43 27.94 – * Length E1 refers to 1/8 NPT connections; E2 refers to 1/4 NPT connections ** The E dimension is the minimum length of the wrench square from the case bottom F SQUARE B A F SQUARE F SQUARE THREAD C L A THREAD A E1 E2 B A INCHES (MM) C1 SPEC NUMBER SELECTION GUIDE Series P-500 Connection Range*1-1/2" 2" 2-1/2" 3-1/2" 4-1/2" Spec No. Spec No. Spec No. Spec No. Spec No. 1/8-27 LM 15 psi 146000A 052420A – – – 30 psi 166327 163931 059306A – – 60 psi 146002A 164005 058129A – – 100 psi 166318 163271 049660A – – 160 psi 146004A 048302A 048536A – – 200 psi 166777 046645A 050852A – – 300 psi 146006A 048363A 046647A – – 600 psi 146007A –––– 1000 psi 146008A –––– 2000 psi 146009A –––– 1/8-27 CBM 15 psi 146010A –––– 30 psi 166320 163930 – – – 60 psi 166321 055155A – – – 100 psi 166322 046776A – – – 160 psi 166323 070791A – – – 200 psi 146015A 102673A – – – 300 psi 146016A 051805A – – – 600 psi 146017A –––– 1000 psi 146018A –––– 2000 psi 146019A –––– 1/4-18 LM 15 psi – 047615A 047102A 5502A 5546A 30 psi – 163149 163278 168536 5804A 60 psi – 163269 163279 168537 5551A 100 psi – 162988 163280 168538 5554A 160 psi – 163270 163281 168539 5559A 200 psi – 163147 163282 168540 5561A 300 psi – 163148 163283 168541 5563A 400 psi – 047492A 049611A 5515A 12265A 600 psi – 047493A 046648A 5516A 5337A 1000 psi – 047494A 047496A 5519A 12266A 2000 psi* – – 171398A – – 3000 psi* – – 171400A – – 5000 psi* – – 143072A – – 1/4-18 CBM 15 psi – 046987A 052827A – – 30 psi – 163949 165213 – – 60 psi – 163272 165214 – – 100 psi – 163273 163284 – – 160 psi – 163274 163285 – – 200 psi – 163275 163286 – – 300 psi – 163276 163287 – – 600 psi – 046991A 050851A – – 1000 psi – – 050870A – – 2000 psi* – – 171399A – – 3000 psi* – – 171401A – – 1/8-27 LM 30" - 15 psi – 66662A – – – 30" - 60 psi – 47925A – – – 30" - 150 psi – 49609A – – – 1/4-18 LM 30" - 15 psi – 47000A 47001A 5493A 63754A 30" - 30 psi – 167218 47105A 5495A 5549A 30" - 60 psi – 57548A 46646A 5496A 12290A 30" - 150 psi – 50517A 47411A 5499A 12292A 30" - 300 psi – – 58156A 15936A – 1/8-27 LM 30" 146020A 47225A – – – 1/8-27 CBM 30" 146021A –––– 1/4-18 LM 30" – 163712 171222A 171223A 5333A * Dual scale dials are available, please contact Customer Service at (863) 534-1504 U-clamp kit for 1-1/2" P-500, Spec #166732 ProductsC2 For Gauges/Thermometers: For Electronic Products: For Diaphragm Seals: U.S. GAUGE PMT PRODUCTS M&G PRODUCTS 820 Pennsylvania Blvd. 820 Pennsylvania Blvd. 8600 Somerset Drive Feasterville, PA 19053 U.S.A. Feasterville, PA 19053 U.S.A. Largo, FL 33773 U.S.A. Tel: (215) 355-6900 Tel: (215) 355-6900 Tel: (727) 536-7831 Fax: (215) 354-1802 Fax: (215) 354-1800 Fax: (727) 539-6882 www.ametekusg.com www.ametekusg.com www.ametek.com/tci Customer Service Tel: (863) 534-1504 Customer Service Fax: (863) 533-7465 © 2006, by AMETEK, Inc. All rights reserved. PDF606 (160126) Specifications are subject to change without notice. Visit our Web sites for the most up-to-date information. For Gauges/Thermometers: For Electronic Products: For Diaphragm Seals: U.S. GAUGE PMT PRODUCTS M&G PRODUCTS 820 Pennsylvania Blvd. 820 Pennsylvania Blvd. 8600 Somerset Drive Feasterville, PA 19053 U.S.A. Feasterville, PA 19053 U.S.A. Largo, FL 33773 U.S.A. Tel: (215) 355-6900 Tel: (215) 355-6900 Tel: (727) 536-7831 Fax: (215) 354-1802 Fax: (215) 354-1800 Fax: (727) 539-6882 www.ametekusg.com www.ametekusg.com www.ametek.com/tci Customer Service Tel: (863) 534-1504 Customer Service Fax: (863) 533-7465 General Purpose Gauges Series P-500 Low Cost Utility Gauges AURORA MODEL 481 & 485 DIESEL ENGINE DRIVEN FIRE PUMP COOLING WATER PIPING DATA Section 916 Page 301 Date July 2001 Supersedes Section 916 Page 301 Dated January 1997 This instructional data explains the installation and operation of the cooling system for UL listed, FM approved Fire Pump engines equipped with heat exchangers. Engines equipped with heat exchangers use an engine mounted water pump to circulate jacket water around the tubes of the heat exchanger to maintain proper jacket water temperatures. Cooling water, supplied by the Fire Pump, is piped through the tubes and dis- charged to waste. REQUIREMENTS The loop portion of the cooling water supply piping, shown above, incorporates all components required by NFPA and is sized to provide the required volume of water at the proper pressure for the heat exchangers of the engine models listed in Table A. Model 481 & 485 pumps are shipped from the plant with the loop piped between the pump and engine. The pipe and loop sizes are determined by the engine model. COMPONENTS 1. A flushing type strainer is used to protect the regula- tor valve, solenoid valve and the tubes of the heat exchanger from foreign material. 2. The regulator valve is used to control the volume and pressure of the cooling water. 3. The solenoid valve opens automatically when the engine is started and closes automatically on engine shut- down to prevent the waste of cooling water. (One red wire must be connected to terminal #1 of the engine junc- tion box, the other red wire to terminal #11 of the engine junction box, and the green wire grounded to the engine block. Refer to applicable wiring diagrams.) 4. The valves in the BYPASS Iine of the loop are nor- mally CLOSED. They should ONLY be opened to pro- vide cooling water to the engine if the regulator valve or solenoid valve require repair. 5. Valves "A" and "B" are normally OPEN. They should ONLY be closed if repair is required to the regulator valve or solenoid valve. 6. The gauge indicates back pressure on the cooling water discharge. The recommended back pressure to assure adequate flow is 15-20 PSI and should not exceed the allowable pressure shown in Table A. 7. Since cooling loop components are subject to bumps and movement during shipping. all compo- nents must be checked for pipe strain and leakage prior to initial startup. INSTALLATION -COOLING WATER OUTLET The cooling water outlet piping from the engine heat exchanger must be at least the size listed in Table A. The piping must be short, have no valves and dis- charge into an open waste cone. If deviations from the requirement of discharge to an open waste cone are permitted by the authority having jurisdiction, the proposed plumbing must be reviewed to assure that the back pressure created wiII not reduce the cooling water flow to below that required for the engine. VALVE "A" STRAINERS BY-PASS VALVES NORMALLY CLOSED GAUGE REGULATOR VALVES VALVE "B" SOLENOID VALVE FROM PUMP TO ENGINE AURORA MODEL 481 & 495 DIESEL ENGINE DRIVEN FIRE PUMP COOLING WATER PIPING DATA Section 916 Page 302 Date May 2004 Supersedes Section 916 Page 302 Dated July 2001 If the outlet piping from two or more engines is connected to a common manifold, the manifold piping should be sized such that the velocity resulting from the combined flow is the same as that in the outlet piping between the manifold and heat exchanger. Adequate pipe supports must be provided for the loop and outlet piping to minimize vibration and prevent excessive strain at the heat exchanger, pump and engine connec- tions. Engine coolant should be added in accordance with the engine manufacturer’s recommendations. OPERATION The regulator valve is adjusted during operational tests at the plant and set between 15 and 20 PSI back pressure. If additional adjusting is necessary, see the following procedure: With the pump operating at the rated duty, the adjustment is made after the engine block temperature has risen to the level required to open the engine thermostat. The thermo- stat opens at approximately 170°F. The temperature will stabilize and then decrease slightly. At this point, the regu- lator is adjusted between 15 and 20 PSI by turning the reg- ulator screw clockwise to increase the pressure and coun- terclockwise to reduce the pressure. The regulator screw is then locked into place with the locknut provided. MAINTENANCE 1. Strainers must be inspected frequently and kept clean. 2. If cooling water temperature changes, the regulator valve may require adjustment. FIRE PUMP ENGINES MODELS JU6H-UFADMG JU6H-UFADP0 JU6H-UFADR0 JU6H-UFADT0 JU6H-UFAD58 JU6H-UFADP8 JU6H-UFADR8 JU6H-UFADW8 JU6H-UFADNG JU6H-UFADQ0 JU6H-UFADS8 JU6H-UFADX8 JU6H-UFADM8 JU6H-UFADN0 JU6H-UFAD88 JU6H-UFADS0 JU6H-UFAD98 ® FM UL UL APPROVED RATINGS BHP/KW JU6H MODEL RATED SPEED US-EPA (NSPS) Available Until 1760 2100 2350 2400 UFADM8 175 131 No Expiration UFADMG 175 131 175 131 No Expiration FM-UL-cUL APPROVED RATINGS BHP/KW UFAD58 183 137 No Expiration UFADNG 190 142 181 135 183 137 183 137 No Expiration UFADN0 197 147 197 147 200 149 200 149 No Expiration UFADP0 220 164 209 156 211 157 211 157 No Expiration UFADP8 220 164 No Expiration UFADQ0 224 167 226 169 226 169 No Expiration UFAD88 237 177 No Expiration UFADR0 238 177.5 240 179 240 179 No Expiration UFADR8 250 187 No Expiration UFADS8 260 194 No Expiration UFADS0 260 194 268 200 268 200 No Expiration UFADT0 229 171 274 204 275 205 275 205 No Expiration UFADW8 282 211 No Expiration UFADX8 305 227.5 No Expiration UFAD98 315 235 No Expiration SPECIFICATIONS USA EPA (NSPS) Tier 3 Emissions Certified Off-Road (40 CFR Part 89) and NSPS Stationary (40 CFR Part 60 Sub Part llll). Meet EU Stage IIIA emission levels. All Models available for Export ITEM JU6H MODELS M8 MG 58 NG N0 P8 88 P0 Q0 R0 S0 T0 R8 S8 W8 X8 98 Number of Cylinders 6 Aspiration TRWA Rotation*CW Weight – lb (kg) 1747 (791) SPECIFICATIONS Compression Ratio 19.0:1 17.0:1 Displacement – cu. in. (L) 415 (6.8) Engine Type 4 Stroke Cycle – Inline Construction Bore & Stroke – in. (mm) 4.19 x 5.00 (106 x 127) Installation Drawing D628 Wiring Diagram AC C07591 Wiring Diagram DC C071367, C071360, C071361 C071368, C071360, C071761 Engine Series John Deere 6068 Series Power Tech E John Deere 6068 Series Power Tech Plus Speed Interpolation N/A Abbreviations: CW – Clockwise TRWA – Turbocharged with Raw Water Aftercooling N/A - Not Available *Rotation viewed from Heat Exchanger / Front of engine CERTIFIED POWER RATING • Each engine is factory tested to verify power and performance. •FM-UL power ratings are shown at specific speeds Clarke engines can be ENGINE RATINGS BASELINES • Engines are to be used for stationary emergency standby fire pump service only. Engines are to be tested in accordance with NFPA 25. • Engines are rated at standard SAE conditions of 29.61 in. (752.1 mm) Hg barometer and 77°F (25°C) inlet air temperature [approximates 300 ft (91 4 m) above sea level] by the FM FM UL power ratings are shown at specific speeds, Clarke engines can be applied at a single rated RPM setting ± 50 RPM. 77 F (25 C) inlet air temperature [approximates 300 ft. (91.4 m) above sea level] by the testing laboratory (see SAE Standard J 1349). • A deduction of 3 percent from engine horsepower rating at standard SAE conditions shall be made for diesel engines for each 1000 ft. (305 m) altitude above 300 ft. (91.4 m) • A deduction of 1 percent from engine horsepower rating as corrected to standard SAE conditions shall be made for diesel engines for every 10°F (5.6°C) above 77°F (25°C) ambient temperature. Page 1 of 10 ENGINE EQUIPMENT FIRE PUMP ENGINES ®MODELS JU6H-UFADK0 JU6H-UFADP0 JU6H-UFADR0 JU6H-UFADT0 JU6H-UFAD58 JU6H-UFADP8 JU6H-UFADR8 JU6H-UFADW8 JU6H-UFADM8 JU6H-UFADNG JU6H-UFADQ0 JU6H-UFADS8 JU6H-UFADX8 JU6H-UFADMG JU6H-UFADN0 JU6H-UFAD88 JU6H-UFADS0 JU6H-UFAD98 EQUIPMENT STANDARD OPTIONAL Air Cleaner Direct Mounted, Washable, Indoor Service with Drip Shield Disposable, Drip Proof, Indoor Service Outdoor Type, Single or Two Stage Alternator 12V-DC, 42 Amps with Poly-Vee Belt and Guard 24V-DC, 40 Amps with Poly-Vee Belt and Guard Exhaust Protection Metal Guards on Manifolds and Turbocharger Coupling Bare Flywheel UL Listed Driveshaft and Guard, JU6H- UFAD58/NG/ADMG/ADM8/K0/N0/Q0/R0-CDS30-S1; JU6H- UFADP8/P0/T0/88/R8/S8/S0/W8/X8/98- CDS50-SC at 1760/2100 RPM onlyRPM only Electronic Control Module 12V-DC, Energized to Stop, Primary ECM always Powered on 24V-DC, Energized to Stop, Primary ECM always Powered on Exhaust Flex Connection*Stainless Steel Flex, 150# ANSI Flanged Connection, 5” for JU6H- UFAD58/M8/MG/K0/NG/N0/P8/88; Stainless Steel Flex, 150# ANSI Flanged Connection, 6” for JU6H- UFADP0/Q0/R0/S0/T0/R8/S8/W8/X8/98 Stainless Steel Flex, 150# ANSI Flanged Connection, 6” for JU6H- UFAD58/M8/MG/K0/NG/N0/P8/88; Stainless Steel Flex, 150# ANSI Flanged Connection, 8” for JU6H- UFADP0/Q0/R0/S0/T0/R8/S8/W8/X8/98 Flywheel Housing SAE #3 Flywheel Power Take Off 11.5” SAE Industrial Flywheel Connection Fuel Connections Fire Resistant, Flexible, USA Coast Guard Approved, Supply and Stainless Steel, Braided, cUL Listed, Supply and Return Lines Return Lines Fuel Filter Primary Filter with Priming Pump Fuel Injection System High Pressure Common Rail Engine Heater 120V-AC, 1500 Watt 240V-AC, 1500 Watt Governor, Speed Dual Electronic Control Modules Heat Exchanger Tube and Shell Type, 60 PSI (4 BAR), NPT(F) Connections – Sea/Salt Water Compatible Instrument Panel Multimeter to Display English and Metric, Tachometer, Hourmeter, Water Temperature Oil Pressure and One (1) Voltmeter with Water Temperature, Oil Pressure and One (1) Voltmeter with Toggle Switch, Front Opening Junction Box Integral with Instrument Panel; For DC Wiring Interconnection to Engine Controller Lube Oil Cooler Engine Water Cooled, Plate Type Lube Oil Filter Full Flow with By-Pass Valve Lube Oil Pump Gear Driven, Gear Type Manual Start Control On Instrument Panel with Control Position Warning Light Overspeed Control Electronic, Factory Set, Not Field Adjustablep,y , j Raw Water Solenoid Operation Automatic from Fire Pump Controller and from Engine Instrument Panel Run – Stop Control On Instrument Panel with Control Position Warning Light Starters Two (2) 12V-DC Two (2) 24V-DC Throttle Control Adjustable Speed Control by Increase/Decrease Button, Tamper Proof in Instrument Panel Water Pump Centrifugal Type, Poly-Vee Belt Drive with Guard Abbreviations : DC – Direct Current, AC – Alternating Current, SAE – Society of Automotive Engineers, NPT(F) – National Pipe Tapered Thread (Female), ANSI – American National St d d I tit t ® JU6H - UFADR0 John Deere Base Engine 350 Series 6 Cylinders Heat Exchanger Cooled Power Curve Number EPA Tier 3 Certified Built in USA FM Approved UL Listed MODEL NOMENCLATURE: (10 Digit Models) Standards Institute *JU6H-UFADP8/P0/Q0/R0/S0/T0/R8/S8/W8/X8/98 – All provided with orifice plate mounted in flex exhaust. Note: Engine Controller needs 2 additional signals: Injector Failure, Alternate ECM Selected C133421 revL 10APR12 Specifications and information contained in this brochure subject to change without notice. Fire Protection Products, Inc. 3133 E. Kemper Rd., Cincinnati, Ohio 45241 United States of America Tel +1-513-475-FIRE(3473) Fax +1-513-771-0726 www.clarkefire.com UK, Ltd. Grange Works, Lomond Rd., Coatbridge, ML5-2NN United Kingdom Tel +44-1236-429946 Fax +44-1236-427274 www.clarkefire.com Page 2 of 10 NAMEPLATE BHP (MAXIMUM PUMP LOAD) 282 (211) 1758.5 1759 1759.5 1760 1760.5 1761 1761.5 280.5 281 281.5 282 282.5 283 283.5 Tier-3 Emissions Certification: Ref: Engine Emission Label CARB; EPA RESTRICTED: DATE CREATED DRAWING NO.REV A ENGINE MODEL JU6H-UFADW8 02/06/09 C132968 THIS DRAWING AND THE IN- FORMATION HEREIN ARE OUR PROPERTY AND MAY BE USED BY OTHER ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY US. UNPUBLISHED -- ALL RIGHTS RESERVED UNDER THE COPYRIGHT LAWS.KEVIN KUNKLER 06FEB09 CREATED USE ONLY FOR STAND-BY FIRE PUMP APPLICATIONS FIRE PUMP MODEL: JU6H-UFADW8 Heat Exchanger Cooled Raw Water Charge Cooling Tier 3 Emissions Certified ENGINE SPEED - RPM STANDARD CONDITIONS: (SAE J1349, ISO 3046) 77°F (25°C) AIR INLET TEMPERATURE 29.61 IN. (751.1MM) HG BAROMETRIC PRESSURE #2 DIESEL FUEL (SEE C13940) ENGINE PERFORMANCE: Page 3 of 10 JU6H-UFADW8 USA Produced INSTALLATION & OPERATION DATA (I&O Data) Basic Engine Description Engine Manufacturer John Deere Co. Ignition Type Compression (Diesel) Number of Cylinders 6 Bore and Stroke - in (mm)4.19 (106) X 5 (127) Displacement - in³ (L)415 (6.8) Compression Ratio 17.0:1 Valves per cylinder Intake 2 Exhaust 2 Combustion System Direct Injection Engine Type In-Line, 4 Stroke Cycle Fuel Management Control Electronic, High Pressure Common Rail Firing Order (CW Rotation)1-5-3-6-2-4 Aspiration Turbocharged Charge Air Cooling Type Raw Water Rotation, viewed from front of engine, Clockwise (CW)Standard Engine Crankcase Vent System Open Installation Drawing D628 Weight - lb (kg)1747 (792) Power Rating 1760 Nameplate Power - HP (kW)282 (211) Cooling System - [C051386]1760 Engine Coolant Heat - Btu/sec (kW)133 (140) Engine Radiated Heat - Btu/sec (kW)64 (67.5) Heat Exchanger Minimum Flow 60°F (15°C) Raw H 20 - gal/min (L/min)28 (106) 95°F (35°C) Raw H 20 - gal/min (L/min)38 (144) Heat Exchanger Maximum Cooling Raw Water Inlet Pressure - psi (bar)60 (4.1) Flow - gal/min (L/min)40 (151) Typical Engine H20 Operating Temp - °F (°C)[1]180 (82.2) - 195 (90.6) Thermostat Start to Open - °F (°C)180 (82.2) Fully Opened - °F (°C)203 (95) Engine Coolant Capacity - qt (L)22.2 (21) Coolant Pressure Cap - lb/in² (kPa)15 (103) Maximum Engine Coolant Temperature - °F (°C)230 (110) Minimum Engine Coolant Temperature - °F (°C)160 (71.1) High Coolant Temp Alarm Switch - °F (°C)[2]235 (113) - 241 (116) Electric System - DC Standard Optional System Voltage (Nominal)12 24 Battery Capacity for Ambients Above 32°F (0°C) Voltage (Nominal)12 [C07633] 24 [C07633] Qty. Per Battery Bank 12 SAE size per J537 8D 8D CCA @ 0°F (-18°C)1400 1400 Reserve Capacity - Minutes 430 430 Battery Cable Circuit, Max Resistance - ohm 0.0012 0.0012 Battery Cable Minimum Size 0-120 in. Circuit Length [3]00 00 121-160 in. Circuit Length [3]000 000 161-200 in. Circuit Length [3]0000 0000 Charging Alternator Maximum Output - Amp, 40 [C071363] 55 [C071365] Starter Cranking Amps, Rolling - @60°F (15°C) 440 [RE69704/RE70404] 250 [C07819/C07820] NOTE: This engine is intended for indoor installation or in a weatherproof enclosure. 1Engine H2O temperature is dependent on raw water temperature and flow. 2High Coolant Switch threshold varies with engine load. 3Positive and Negative Cables Combined Length. Page 1 of 2 Page 4 of 10 JU6H-UFADW8 USA Produced INSTALLATION & OPERATION DATA (I&O Data) Exhaust System 1760 Exhaust Flow - ft.³/min (m³/min)1400 (39.6) Exhaust Temperature - °F (°C)961 (516) Maximum Allowable Back Pressure - in H 20 (kPa)30 (7.5) Minimum Exhaust Pipe Dia. - in (mm)[4]6 (152) Fuel System 1760 Fuel Consumption - gal/hr (L/hr)13.7 (51.9) Fuel Return - gal/hr (L/hr)21.3 (80.6) Fuel Supply - gal/hr (L/hr)35 (132) Fuel Pressure - lb/in² (kPa)3 (20.7) - 6 (41.4) Minimum Line Size - Supply - in..50 Schedule 40 Steel Pipe Pipe Outer Diameter - in (mm)0.848 (21.5) Minimum Line Size - Return - in..375 Schedule 40 Steel Pipe Pipe Outer Diameter - in (mm)0.675 (17.1) Maximum Allowable Fuel Pump Suction Lift with clean Filter - in H20 (mH20)80 (2) Maximum Allowable Fuel Head above Fuel pump, Supply or Return - ft (m)6.6 (2) Fuel Filter Micron Size 2 (Secondary) Heater System Standard Optional Engine Coolant Heater Wattage (Nominal)1360 1360 Voltage - AC, 1 Phase 115 (+5% -10%) 230 (+5%, -10%) Part Number [C123640] [C123644] Air System 1760 Combustion Air Flow - ft.³/min (m³/min)474 (13.4) Air Cleaner Standard Optional Part Number [C03244] [C03327] Type Indoor Service Only, Canister, with Shield Single-Stage Cleaning method Washable Disposable Air Intake Restriction Maximum Limit Dirty Air Cleaner - in H20 (kPa)14 (3.5) 10 (2.5) Clean Air Cleaner - in H20 (kPa)7 (1.7) 5 (1.2) Maximum Allowable Temperature (Air To Engine Inlet) - °F (°C)[5]130 (54.4) Lubrication System Oil Pressure - normal - lb/in² (kPa)40 (276) - 60 (414) Low Oil Pressure Alarm Switch - lb/in² (kPa)[6]30 (207) to 35 (241) In Pan Oil Temperature - °F (°C)220 (104) - 245 (118) Total Oil Capacity with Filter - qt (L)34.3 (32.5) Lube Oil Heater Optional Optional Wattage (Nominal)150 150 Voltage 120V (+5%, -10%) 240V (+5%, -10%) Part Number C04430 C04431 Performance 1760 BMEP - lb/in² (kPa)306 (2110) Piston Speed - ft/min (m/min)1467 (447) Mechanical Noise - dB(A) @ 1m C133379 Power Curve C132968 4Based on Nominal System. Back pressure flow analysis must be done to assure maximum allowable back pressure is not exceeded. (Note: minimum exhaust Pipe diameter is based on: 15 feet of pipe, one 90° elbow, and a silencer pressure drop no greater than one half of the maximum allowable back pressure.) 5Review for horsepower derate if ambient air entering engine exceeds 77°F (25°C). 6Low Oil Pressure Switch threshold varies w/engine speed. [ ] indicates component reference part number. Page 2 of 2 C133101 Rev D MD 12FEB12 Page 5 of 10 CLARKE Fire Protection Products Air Cleaner Valves Type…………..………….. ..Indoor Usage Only Type……..…………………Poppet Oiled Fabric Pleats Arrangement………………Overhead Valve Material……..…..…….…… Surgical Cotton Number/Cylinder…………1 intake Aluminum Mesh 1 exhaust Operating Mechanism……Mechanical Rocker Arm Air Cleaner - Optional Type of Lifter…………….. Large Head Type…………………………Canister Valve Seat Insert…………Replaceable Material………………………Pleated Paper Housing………………..……Enclosed Fuel Pump Type…………………………Diaphragm Camshaft Drive……………………… Cam Lobe Material………….………….Cast Iron Chill Hardened Heat Exchanger (USA) Location…………...….…….In Block Type…………………………Tube & Shell Drive……………….………..Gear, Spur Materials Type of Cam…………..…...Ground Tube& Headers……………Copper Shell…………………………Copper Electrode……………………Zinc Type………………….Raw Water Cooled Heat Exchanger (UK) Materials (in contact with raw water) Type…………………………Tube & Bundle Tubes……………………… 90/10 CU/NI Materials Headers ………………… 36500 Muntz Tube& Headers……………Copper Covers ………………… 83600 Red Brass Shell………………. Aluminum Plumbing ………………… 316 Stainless Steel/ Brass 90/10 Silicone Coolant Pump Injection Pump Type……….…………………Centrifugal Type……………………….Rotary Drive……………………………Poly Vee Belt Drive……………………… Gear Coolant Thermostat Lubrication Cooler Type…………………………Non Blocking Type…………………………Plate Qty……………………………1 Lubrication Pump Connecting Rod Type…………………………Gear Type…………………………I-Beam Taper Drive……………………… Gear Material………………………Forged Steel Alloy Crank Pin Bearings Main Bearings Type…………………………Precision Half Shell Type…………………………Precision Half Shells Number………………………1 Pair Per Cylinder Material……………………Steel Backed-Aluminum Lined Material………………………Wear-Guard Crankshaft Piston Material………………………Forged Steel Type and Material…………Aluminum Alloy with Reinforced Type of Balance……………Dynamic Top Ring Groove Cooling…………………… Oil Jet Spray Cylinder Block Type…………………………One Piece with Piston Pin Non-Siamese Cylinders Type…………………………Full Floating - Offset Material………………………Annealed Gray Iron Cylinder Head Piston Rings Type……..………………… Slab 2 Valve Number/Piston……………3 Material……………………. Annealed Gray Iron Top…………………………Keystone Barrel Faced - Plasma Coated Cylinder Liners Second…………………… Tapered Cast Iron Type……..………………… Centrifugal Cast, Wet Liner Third…………………………Double Rail Type Material………………..….…Alloy Iron Plateau, Honed w/Expander Spring JU4H & JU6H ENGINE MODELS ENGINE MATERIALS AND CONSTRUCTION Charge Air Cooler (JU6H-60,62,68,74,84, ADK0, AD58, ADNG, ADN0, ADQ0, ADR0, AAQ8, AARG, ADP8, ADP0, ADT0, AD88, ADR8, AD98, ADS0, ADW8, ADX8, AD98 only) C13615 19 NOV 09 DSP Page 6 of 10 Page 7 of 10 H G F E D c B A 8 7 6 DA T U M S : 5 CA U T I O N : AL L PL U M B I N G MU S T BE SU P P O R T E D AN D / O R IS O L A T E D SO TH A T NO WE I G H T 4 3 AT T E N T I O N ( B - MO U N T I N G FA C E OF FL Y W H E E L OR ST R E S S IS AP P L I E D TO AN Y EN G I N E CO M P O N E N T RE F E R TO TH E SP E C I F I C MO D E L 'I N S T A L L A T I O N AN D OP E R A T I O N DA T A ' FO R IN S T A L L A T I O N GU I D E L I N E S G! : ] - EN G I N E CR A N K S H A F T HO R I Z O N T A L CE N T E R L I N E ~ - EN G I N E CR A N K S H A F T VE R T I C A L CE N T E R L I N E + -CE N T E R OF GR A V I T Y OF EN G I N E ~ - CL O C K W I S E RO T A T I O N WH E N V l ~ D FR O M FR O N T OF EN G I N E ~ E:' Si l ' ! : m • 0 : i ~i ~ lii"~ti j e.~ !i ~1 0 "T R W A ' (T U R B O C H A R G E D wl RA W WA T E R AF T E R C O O L I N G ) MO D E L S .. ~ s CO O L A N T Fi l l . JU 8 ~ U F A D 5 8 , -U F A D 8 8 JU 6 H - U F A D K O , -U F A D N G JU 8 ~ U F A D P 8 , -U F A D N O JU 6 H - U F A D M 6 , -U F A D M G JU l 5 H - U F A D P 8 (M O D E L S SH O W N ) JU 6 ~ U F A D 9 8 -U F A D P O JU 6 H -U F A D Q O , -U F A D R O JU 6 ~ U F A D R I ! , -U F J JU l 5 H - U F A D S 6 , -U F J JU 6 H - U F A D W l l , - I i ~ - . : " : : t k n I I - $ J> C r 11 1 i 1· ~ fa I I DR A W I N G SU B J E C T T O CH A N G E WI T H O U T NO T I C E 11 1 1 • . 1 1 RA W ~ : , . I N L . E T ~ ~ ~ I 10 1 [ 8 . 1 1 RE V DE . 9 C R I P ' T 1 0 N NO T E S : 1. FU E L SU P P L Y PI P I N G FR O M TA N K TO EN G I N E SH O U L D BE 11 2 " M I N I M U M PI P E DI A M E T E R . 2. FU E L RE T U R N PI P I N G FR O M EN G I N E TO TA N K SH O U L D BE 3 / 8 ' MI N I M U M PI P E DI A M E T E R . ., , . . . DW N A I IS S U E D DE N O I N E E H N O CR A W N 3 I &7 2 I li l W L a I AD D E D P E # T I E R : S E M G I N E M O O B . 8 I 18 4 5 I l< . . N AD D E D JU M i - U F A I P I EN G I N E MO l : E I . I 11 M 5 I MM . D RE V I S E D E> C H Fl . E X CO N N E C T I O N DA . T A 19 4 6 Ol i P E= RE V I S E D E> C M Fl E X CO N N E C T I O N DA . T A 11 1 7 JC A . Vl ~ F R O M T O P OF EN G I N E iU i 2 if ... ~ DO NOT SCALE 111D[45.I] i' 1&CWIFLANOE F1.D: ElCHAIJST .IUllH-UF~-UF....,._ -uFACtlG, -UFACHO, ·LFADll. -UFADP8,-UFADMI, -UFADMO OR I' wl1SCMI Fl.ANGE wlm!FICE F1.D: EXHAUST .......,FADQll, ·UFADPD. -UFADTD. -UFIDRD. -uFADRI, -UFADS&, ·LFAD6D, ..UFADWI. ..UFADXI . ..U:ADI& 111(4.1] BATTERY"1 ~ POBITIVE OONNECT10N IT\JDM121:1.7fi -"""1±1 lltlffj ii 11114-11 z -~~ ~ ~h i rl i i ; , ! ~- J~N ;;~~~ ... ~~!:i ~ ~;," ~ Fin Protection INSTALLATION DRAWING, FIRE PUMP ENGINE JU6H TIER 3 MODELS F RE I M B J E N G I N E F O O ' T M O U N T I N G H O l . E L O C A T I O N B - P A G E Z 19 0 1 JC A JW ; : . Z& I U L 1 D ~ - " ' ' G AO O B > D I W : N B I C N B F R O N T V I E W Z O N E D I P G 1 21 1 1 1 °" " ao c n o ~ ., . . :: : ; , _ , . """ H AD D E D E N B I E MC X J E L . 8 : JI J I K . U F A D M I &. l . J m i - U ' A D M G 2f 7 3 JC A . Dl l D E C 1 0 - " ' " " ' 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 H G F E D c B Page 8 of 10 HI ~ F l E l D c B A 8 I .. . . :A ... . . I FL Y W H E E L H O U B I N G M1 t l X 1. I W M 12 X DR A W I N G S U B J E C T T O CH A N G E W I T H O U T NO T I C E 8 \ I , I , 7 I 6 I 5 * FO R EN G I N E SP E C I F I C OP T I O N S SE E ww w . C L A R K E F I R E . c o m DE T A I L DA T U M -A - BA R E FL Y W H E E L ~r ... . . ~ 3o'l'-1~1.0 1 . , . . , , l1 ±- = F ~: ~ ~~ 41 ll l U I 1 .. . . 1 OJ O , O J ... . ~ + "" " ' J l l l 1 0 . 1 1 B. C . !S J I - - - i : ± r " " " - 7 6 5 4 3 2 DO NOT SCALE r I I I OJ O , O J I US E 3 1 < ' MI N I M U M MO U N T I N G HA R D W A R E @:] i R: A D E B, CL A S S 1 0 9 R' E C D M M E N D E D > ~x ~ 1 e c 8 . 3 J es 4 c m a 58 . 6 t 10. 18l 3 0 0 . 9 [ l l . 8 33 7 (1 3 . 3 35 [ 1 . 4J 94 [ 11. 6] x • 2 0 r n . B J _ .. . , SL D T 4 X ~ ~ R : I- " ~ ~ ~ :; : ~ ~ -~ ~ . . - ~ ~ " ' CJ' \ r" ~ co - ... . cu .,, . . . . ~ . . . I FU E i . P i . M P I Im °" " ' " " " " " 12 ( 2 . ~ MT T E < Y ' 2 P0 6 I T 1 V E CO N N E C l l O N - . . . . 81 \ I D M1 2 X 1. 7 5 OJO , O J [ f l 24 7 [ 1 U ] AC CO N ' < E C T I O N I- E A T E R 15 0 0 W A T T 8 ST O . -1 1 & V A C + U i / - 1 0 % O P T . - Z I J V / C + d J - 1 ° " ' ., . e l ! i ! ~!I ! ... "" ! ef t i "'~~ "° i i ' ~~ ENGWE CRl\l«SliAFT CEJrilTERUNE CLARKE Fire ProUctiars Protbu:ta. lrsc. INSTALLATION DRAWING, FIRE PUMP ENGINE JUBH ~ • R I TIER 3 MODELS :.= - · : : · - ~ i" " T E I O I H . 1-·-os2s I :i i . • . : : . , . : t l l - • - I-I A _., I-~ n I Nr8 I MM[INCHJ 4 3 2 H G F E D c B A Rating Specific Emissions Data - John Deere Power Systems Rating Data Rating Certified Power (kW) Rated Speed Vehicle Model Number 6068HFC48A 235 1760 Clarke Fire Pump * The emission data listed is measured from a laboratory test engine according to the test procedures of 40 CFR 89 or 40 CFR 1039, as applicable. The test engine is intended to represent nominal production hardware, and we do not guarantee that every production engine will have identical test results. The family parent data represents multiple ratings and this data may have been collected at a different engine speed and load. Emission results may vary due to engine manufacturing tolerances, engine operating conditions, fuels used, or other conditions beyond our control. This information is property of Deere & Company. It is provided solely for the purpose of obtaining certification or permits of Deere powered equipment. Unauthorized distribution of this information is prohibited Units CO Pm NOx HC NOx + HC g/kW-hr 0.6 0.07 3.6 0.1 3.7 g/hp-hr 0.4 0.06 2.7 0.1 2.8 Certificate Data Engine Model Year EPA Family Name EPA JD Name EPA Certificate Number 2011 BJDXL06.8131 350HAL JDX-NRCI-11-30 CARB Executive Order Not Applicable Parent of Family 6068HFG85A g/kW-hr 0.7 0.10 3.7 0.1 3.8 Units CO Pm NOx HC NOx + HC JDPS 2/16/2011 Page 9 of 10 CLARKE www.clarkefire.com RPM BHP OVERALL 31.5 Hz 63 Hz 125 Hz 250 Hz 500 Hz 1k Hz 2k Hz 4k Hz 8k Hz 16k Hz dB(A) dB(A) dB(A) dB(A) dB(A) dB(A) dB(A) dB(A) dB(A) dB(A) dB(A) 1760 282 109.2 66.5 68.5 83.7 89.4 96.8 99.6 104.7 102.6 100.8 100.6 RPM BHP OVERALL 31.5 Hz 63 Hz 125 Hz 250 Hz 500 Hz 1k Hz 2k Hz 4k Hz 8k Hz 16k Hz dB(A)dB(A)dB(A)dB(A)dB(A)dB(A)dB(A)dB(A)dB(A)dB(A)dB(A) 1760 282 * Values above are provided at 3.3ft (1m) from engine block and do not include the raw exhaust noise. The above data reflects values for a typical engine of this model, speed and power in a free-field environment. Fire Protection Products JU6H-UFADW8 FIRE PUMP DRIVER NOISE DATA Mechanical Engine Noise * Installation specifics such as background noise level and amplification of noise levels from reflecting off of surrounding objects, will affect the overall noise levels observed. As a result of this, Clarke makes no guarantees to the above levels in an actual installation. ** Values above are provided at 3.3ft (1m), 90 o horizontal, from a vertical exhaust outlet and does not include noise created mechanically by the engine Raw Exhaust Engine Noise ** Octave Band Octave Band To be provided later C133379_revA 22Feb10 dsp Page 10 of 10 REQUIRED COMPONENTS (1) BATTERY RACK (2) BATTERIES (2) POSITIVE CABLES (2) NEGATIVE CABLES AURORA MODEL 481 & 485 PUMPS DIESEL BATTERY CABLE DIAGRAMS Section 916 Page 252 Date October 2006 Supersedes Section 916 Page 252 Dated June 2002 Pentair Water 12V 12V NEG NEG POS POS 24V NEG POS POS POS POS NEG NEG NEG 24V REQUIRED COMPONENTS (2) BATTERY RACKS (4) BATTERIES (2) POSITIVE CABLES (2) NEGATIVE CABLES (2) INTERCONNECTING CABLES 12 VOLT SYSTEM 24 VOLT SYSTEM NOTES: 1. Clarke “VMFP,” “JU4H” & “JU6H” Engines require cable sets of different lengths. On these engine models, a 2/0 guage postive and negative cable set 60” (1524 mm) long, and a 3/0 guage positive and negativecable set 80” (2032 mm) long are furnished. 2. Refer to Section 916, Page 251 for details of batteries, racks and cables. ENGINE APPLICABILITY CUMMINS: ALL “CFP” MODELS CLARKE: ALL “JU4H” MODELS ALL “JU64” MODELS ALL “JW6H” MODELS EDWARDS: ALL MODELS ENGINE APPLICABILITY CLARKE: ALL “JX6H” MODELS CATERPILLAR: ALL MODELS AURORA MODEL 481 & 485 PUMPS DIESEL BATTERIES, RACKS, & CABLES Section 916 Page 251 Date June 2002 Supersedes Section 916 Page 251 Dated July 2001 Pentair Water 11 (279) 20.75 (527) 20.5 (521) 16.25 (419) 23.5 (597) 5.5 (140) BATTERY BATTERY RACK 60" or 80" (1524 or 2032) 60" or 80" (1524 or 2032) 17/32 DIA. HOLE (TYPICAL) POSITIVE CABLE NEGATIVE CABLE 12" (305)INTERCONNECTING CABLE POS POS NEG NEG 11 (279) NOTES: 1. Dimensions are in inches (mm) and may vary ± 1/4" (6). 2. Batteries are 12 volt, lead-acid type D-8D, approximately 95 Ibs. each, dry. 3. Batteries are shipped dry. Electrolyte (approx.19 quarts per battery) must be procured locally. 4. Refer to Section 916 page 252 for exact number of batteries & cables to be furnished based on the diesel engine manufacturer and model used. 5. Battery racks are fabricated steel, approximately 20 Ibs. each. 6. Each rack holds 2 batteries. Racks are not to be stacked. NOTES: 1. All cables are SAE J55BA type SGT with tensile attachment of 700-800 lbs. 2. Positive & negative cables 60" (1524) long are 2/0 gauge; positive & negative cables 80" (2032) long are 3/0 gauge. 3. Terminal clamps have steel reinforced inserts. 4. Not all cable types are required for every engine. Refer to Section 916 page 252 for cable applicability. AURORA FIRE PUMPS DIESEL ENGINE MUFFLERS Section 916 Page 261 Date July 2012 Supersedes Section 916 Page 261 Dated August 2011 © 2012 Pentair Pump Group, Inc. MUFFLER INLET & OUTLET SIZE – 150# ANSI FLANGE A DIA. B ENGINE MODEL MUFFLER INLET & OUTLET COMMERCIAL GRADE RESIDENTIAL GRADE CRITICAL GRADE A B WGT A B WGT A B WGT CATERPILLAR 3406C 6" FLANGED 12 42 35 12 54 43 16 73 131 3412C*, 3508C, C18*8" FLANGED 18 49 110 18 61 124 20 75 220 CLARKE FIRE PROTECTION JU4H-UF10, -UF12, -UF14, -UF20, -UF22, -UF24, -UFAB26, -UFAEA0, -UFAEE8, -UFAEF2, -UFADJ2, -UFADJ8 3" NPT 8 36 19 8 42 21 10 42 42 JU4R-UF09, -UF11, -UF13, -UF19, -UF21, -UF23, -UFAEA9, -UFAEE7, -UFAEF1 JU4H-UF30, -UF32, -UF34, -UF40, -UF42, -UF 50, -UF52, -UF54, -UF58, -UFADJG, -UFADP0, -UFADR0, -UFADW8, -UFADY8, -UFAD5G 4" FLANGED 10 36 24 10 46 29 12 55 68 JU4R-UF40, -UF49, UF51 -UF53 JU6H-UF30, -UF32, -UF34, -UF 50, -UF52, -UF54, -UF58, -UF60, -UF62, -UF62, -UF68, -UF84, -UFAAPG, -UFAAQ8, -UFAARG, -UFAAS0,-UFAB76, -UFABL0, -UFABL8, -UFD0, -UFD2, -UFG8, -UFM0, -UFM2, -UFM8, -UFAD58, -UFAD88, -UFADM0, -UFADM8, -UFADN0, -UFADNG, -UFADP8 5" FLANGED 10 42 27 10 54 34 14 61 92 DP6H SERIES JW6H-UF30, -UF40, UF48 DS0H SERIES*5" FLANGED 10 42 27 10 54 34 14 61 92DR8H SERIES* JW6H-UF50, -UF58, -UF60, -UF8, -UFAAM8, -UFAA80, -UFADD0, -UFADB0, -UFADF0, -UFADJO, -FAD70, -UFAD80 6" FLANGED 12 42 35 12 54 43 16 73 131JU6H-UFAD98, -UFADP0, -UFADQ0, -UFADR0, -UFADR8, -UFADS0, -UFADS8, -FADT0, -UFADW8 -UFADX8 DQ6H SERIES DT2H SERIES* JX6H SERIES 8" FLANGED 18 49 110 18 61 124 20 75 220 CUMMINS CFP5E, CFP59, CFP7E Series 4" NPT, FLANGED 10 36 24 10 46 29 12 55 68 CFP83 Series 4" NPT, FLANGED 10 36 24 10 46 29 12 55 68 CFP9E Series 5" NPT, FLANGED 10 42 27 10 54 34 14 61 92 CFP11E Series 5" NPT, FLANGED 10 42 27 10 54 34 14 61 92 CFP15E Series 6" FLANGED 12 42 35 12 54 43 16 73 131 CFP23E Series 8" NPT, FLANGED 18 49 110 18 61 124 20 75 220 CFP30E Series 10" NPT, FLANGED 22 64 205 22 75 220 28 99 360 DEUTZ DFP4-2011 Series 3" NPT 8 36 19 8 42 21 10 42 42 DFP4-2012 Series 4" FLANGED 10 36 24 10 46 29 12 55 68 DFP6 Series 6" FLANGED 12 42 35 12 54 43 16 73 131 © 2012 Pentair Pump Group, Inc. *FLANGED FLEX CONNECTOR PROVIDED BY DIESEL ENGINE MANUFACTURER. NO ADDITIONAL FLEX CONNECTOR OR ADAPTOR FITTING IS REQUIRED OR PROVIDED BY AURORA. AURORA FIRE PUMPS EXHAUST FLEX CONNECTORS Section 916 Page 262 Date July 2012 Supersedes Section 916 Page 262 Dated August 2011 ANSI FLANGEBY AURORA FLEX CONNECTORBY DIESEL ENGINEMANUFACTURER FLANGE TO FITDIESEL ENGINEEXHAUST OUTLET FLARED TO FITDIESEL ENGINEEXHAUST OUTLET 18" NPT THREAD TOFIT DIESEL ENGINEEXHAUST OUTLET 18" STYLE "E" 27.5" STYLE "D" STYLE "C" STYLE B* STYLE A ENGINE MODEL MUFFLER CONNECTION SIZE FLEX CONNECTOR STYLE CATERPILLAR 3406C 6" FLANGED B 3412C*, 3508C, C18*8" FLANGED B CLARKE FIRE PROTECTION JU4H-UF10, -UF12, -UF14, -UF20, -UF22, -UF24, -UFAB26, -UFAEA0, -UFAEE8, -UFAEF2, -UFADJ2, -UFADJ8 3" NPT A JU4R-UF09, -UF11, -UF13, -UF19, -UF21, -UF23, -UFAEA9, -UFAEE7, -UFAEF1 JU4H-UF30, -UF32, -UF34, -UF40, -UF42, -UF 50, -UF52, -UF54, -UF58, -UFADJG, -UFADP0, -UFADR0, -UFADW8, -UFADY8, -UFAD5G 4” FLANGED A JU4R-UF40, -UF49, UF51 -UF53 JU6H-UF30, -UF32, -UF34, -UF 50, -UF52, -UF54, -UF58, -UF60, -UF62, -UF62, -UF68, -UF84, -UFAAPG, -UFAAQ8, -UFAARG, -UFAAS0,-UFAB76, -UFABL0, -UFABL8, -UFD0, -UFD2, -UFG8, -UFM0, -UFM2, -UFM8, -UFAD58, -UFAD88, -UFADM0, -UFADM8, -UFADN0, -UFADNG, -UFADP8 5” FLANGED B DP6H SERIES JW6H-UF30, -UF40, UF48 DS0H SERIES*5" FLANGE BDR8H SERIES* JW6H-UF50, -UF58, -UF60, -UF8, -UFAAM8, -UFAA80, -UFADD0, -UFADB0, -UFADF0, -UFADJO, -FAD70, -UFAD80 6" FLANGED BJU6H-UFAD98, -UFADP0, -UFADQ0, -UFADR0, -UFADR8, -UFADS0, -UFADS8, -FADT0, -UFADW8 -UFADX8 DQ6H SERIES DT2H SERIES* JX6H SERIES 8" FLANGED B CUMMINS CFP5E, CFP59, CFP7E Series 3" NPT, FLANGED, CUFF A, B CFP83 Series 4" NPT, FLANGED, CUFF A, B CFP9E Series 4" NPT, FLANGED, CUFF A, B CFP11E Series 5" NPT, FLANGED, CUFF A,B CFP15E Series 6" FLANGED B CFP23E Series 6" FLANGED B CFP30E Series 6" FLANGED B DEUTZ DFP4-2011 Series 3" NPT A DFP4-2012 Series 4" FLANGED B DFP6 Series 6" FLANGED B AurorA® Fire PumPs double Wall Fuel Tanks WiTh FiTTings section 916 Page 258 date september 2014 supersedes section 916 Page 258 dated october 2011 NOTES 1. All dimensions are in inches (mm) and may vary ± 1/4”. 2. Components shown are shipped loose for field assembly. 3. Illustration is for component identification only. Actual installation must meet local codes and all applicable standards. 4. Item 10 may consist of a combination of fittings. 5. Refer to Section 916 page 259 for details of Aurora-furnished components. 6. Items 11 & 17 not required for 515 gallon tanks. NOMINAL USABLE TANK SIZE VOLUME A B C D E F G H L Z IN GALLONS IN GALLONS 119 105 24.5 (622) 73 (1853) 6 (152) 6 (152) 6 (152) 19 (482) 44 (1118) 14 (355) 3 (76) 4 187 165 31 (787) 73 (1853) 6 (152) 6 (152) 6 (152) 19 (482) 44 (1118) 16 (406) 3 (76) 4 300 270 39 (990) 73 (1853) 6 (152) 6 (152) 6 (152) 19 (482) 44 (1118) 22-7/8 (581) 3-3/4 (95) 4 359 320 41 (1041) 73 (1853) 6 (152) 6 (152) 6 (152) 31 (787) 44 (1118) 22-7/8 (581) 4 (102) 4 572 515 51 (1294) 73 (1853) 6 (152) 6 (152) 6 (152) 31 (787) 44 (1118) 30 (761) 5 (127) 4 849 766 65 (1651) 72 (1829) 6 (152) 6 (152) 6 (152) 19 (482) 44 (1118) 30 (761) 4-3/4 (121) 4 1100 993 65 (1651) 84 (2134) 6 (152) 6 (152) 6 (152) 37 (940) 44 (1118) 30 (761) 4-3/4 (121) 6 COMPONENTS FURNISHED BY OTHERS* ITEM NO. QTY. REQ’D DESCRIPTION 20 2 “Z” Diameter Piping for Vent 21 1 1/2” Black Pipe 22 1 3/4” Black Pipe 2" NPT CPLGS. FOR CUST. FURN. LEGS 14 12 14FUEL RETURN FUEL SUPPLY 4 22 10 20 217 19 15 11 16 18 19 17 11 20 18 15 2 16 21 13 7 21 5 8 3 9 1 5 CDEF H "A" DIA. G B L 6"6" 10" DIESEL FUEL TANKS: 1. Tanks are constructed and labeled in accordance with UL-142. 2. Fittings shown are consistent with N.F.P.A. 30 and UL-142. 3. Tank to be pitched toward drain 1/4” per foot with outlet on the same elevation as engine fuel pump. Means of elevating tank (by others) may be required. 4. Usable tank volume is total capacity less 5% for sump and 5% for expansion. COMPONENTS FURNISHED BY AURORA PUMP ITEM NO. QTY. REQ’D DESCRIPTION 1 1 2” NPT Lockable Fuel Cap 2 2 2” Screened Tank Vent 3 1 Fuel Gauge 1-1/2” NPT 4 2 1” NPT Drain Plug 5 2 2” NPT Pipe Plug 7 1 1/2” Tee 8 1 1/2” Close Nipple 9 1 2” Fuel Fill Pipe 10 1 “Z” x “Z” x 2” Tee 11 2 “Z” Coupling 12 1 3/4” NPT Lockable Fuel Valve 13 1 3/4” Close Nipple 14 2 Fuel Hoses for Supply & Return (Furnished by Engine Mfr.) 15 2 2” Street Elbow 16 2 “Z” x “Z” x 2” Tee 17 2 “Z” Close Nipple 18 2 2” Nipple 19 2 “Z” Emergency Vent *Included with fire pump package systems. MAIN FIRE PUMP CONTROLLER DATA Metron FD 4 Fire Pump Controller For Diesel Driven Fire Pumps FD4 Fire Pump Controller Series FD4 The Metron Model FD4 controller is designed to specifically meet the latest NFPA 20 and UL 218 standards for Diesel Engine Fire Pump Controllers. This controller implements the latest component and microprocessor logic technology available. It incorporates years of experience in the design and manufacture of fire pump control systems. The components are installed in a NEMA 2 dust and drip proof enclosure with optional NEMA 3R, 4, 4X, or 12 ratings available. The Operator Interface Device (OlD), manual start pushbuttons, stop push button and Auto-Off-Manual selector switch are located on the exterior door for easy access. The battery disconnect switches are located on the main mounting panel inside the enclosure. The controller’s logic is based on discrete components using the latest technology with high quality, highly reliable printed circuit boards (PCBs) and PCB mounted relays. The controller uses a microprocessor to control automatic engine and alternation between batteries during cranking. It also monitors and records system alarms and pressure, battery voltage and engine functions. This controller is suitable for all engine types with either ‘energized to run’ or ‘energize to stop’ fuel solenoids. Inside the controller are two independent fully automatic microprocessor controlled battery chargers rated at 10 Amps each. The battery chargers operate in such a manner as to ensure that the engine batteries are fully charged within 24 hours. PCB mounted LED’s are provided for indication of AC Power On, and Battery Power On. The controller is supplied with wall mounting brackets as standard. It may be supplied with optional 24” (609.6 mm) legs for free standing floor or skid mounting. Standard and Optional Features All photographs and graphics are typical and may not represent actual product supplied Standard Features Operator Interface Device (OID) with LED Annunciator and Digital Display: General Controller Description The Fire Pump Controller conforms to all requirements of the latest edition of NFPA 20, NFPA 70 and is Listed by Underwriters Laboratories (UL) and Approved by Factory Mutual (FM). The controller is available for either 12VDC or 24VDC operation. Included as standard, the controller is suitable for 120VAC or 208/240VAC input power at no additional cost. Controller Standard Features • The controller includes two 10 Amp battery chargers that are temperature compensated and includes integral LED’s for indication of charge AC Failure, and Battery Power On. • Two outer door mounted manual crank pushbuttons and two battery on/off switches located on the interior back panel. • Outer door mounted AUTO, OFF, MANUAL selector switch with mode condition illuminated on OID with colored LED's • Operator Interface Device (OlD) with 4 lines by 20 character display with large character backlit LCD capable of being read in both direct sunlight or dark lighting conditions. English or Spanish languages are standard and selectable through the OlD. Additional languages available upon request. • The OlD includes 12 pushbuttons for easy screen navigation, system mode changes, alarm reset, horn silencing, and lamp test. • The built in annunciator includes multicolored LED’s for alarm and mode indications. The annunciation LED’s have removable labels that allow the user to easily make changes, if additional alarms and/or language changes are needed. • All controller settings are programmable through the OlD. Programming changes are protected by two levels of passwords to prevent unauthorized modification. • All features are enabled or disabled through the OlD, so no jumpers or external wires are needed, making control logic field modification very easy. • The OlD displays System Pressure, Start Pressure, Battery 1 Voltage, Battery 2 Voltage, Battery 1 Charger Amps, and Battery 2 Charger Amps providing the operator instant system status, Status of Automatic Stop Setting. LED indication of Loss of DC Power. A detailed Battery Voltage and Charging Current screen is also supplied. Current time and date, Number of starts, Total engine run hours, Displayed countdown timers for: Sequential engine start and engine stop, and Time until AC Power fail start. • The state of the art microprocessor based logic includes a real time/date clock that can operate for a minimum of 14 days without DC power connected to controller. • An SD Memory card is used to record pressure log, event log, and auxiliary user programs. The pressure log is stored in separate comma delimited ASCII text files with each file containing data for one day. The SD card is removable and can be read by any PC equipped with an SD card reader. • One RS485 data port is included as standard. • MODBUS Communication Protocol via RS485 port • If there is ever a need to change the internal components all wiring to the internal board is removable without the use of any special tools or soldering. Auxiliary alarms and contacts As standard the controller includes 6 discrete auxiliary inputs, 8 form ‘C’ auxiliary relay outputs. These auxiliary inputs and outputs are in addition to those mandated by NFPA 20. All auxiliary inputs, outputs, and OlD LED’s are field programmable making it very easy to make changes to the controller in the field. Through the OlD the operator can select any 8 of the following auxiliary alarms which will be recorded in the event/alarm logs and annunciated with an LED and/or output relay contact: ENGINE QUIT FAULT HIGH ENGINE OIL TEMP PRESSURE TRANSDUCER FAULT LOW JACKET WATER FLOW PUMP ON DEMAND LOW JACKET WATER LEVEL LOW DISCHARGE PRESSURE LOW HYDRAULIC PRESSURE HIGH DISCHARGE PRESSURE GAS DETECTION REMOTE START SIGNAL LOW FIREWATER PRESSURE DELUGE VALVE START AIR DAMPER CLOSED HIGH FUEL LEVEL AIR DAMPER OPEN FUEL SPILL LOW PURGE PRESSURE FUEL TANK RUPTURE LOW GEAR OIL PRESSURE LOW PUMP ROOM TEMP LOW COOLANT LEVEL RESERVOIR LOW HIGH GEAR OIL TEMP RESERVOIR EMPTY HIGH VIBRATION RESERVOIR HIGH LOW FUEL PRESSURE FLOW METER ON HIGH EXHAUST TEMP RELIEF VALVE OPEN HIGH FUEL TEMP LOW SUCTION PRESSURE PUMP ON DEMAND Data logging: Pressure Log: The Pressure log provides a continuous pressure recording for one month of data. Each time the pressure log records a pressure it includes the time and date of the reading and is stored on the SD memory card. The data recorded in the pressure log can be searched by each sample, by minute, or by hour allowing for easy access to specific data. Event Log: The event log is also stored on the SD memory card. It will hold a maximum of 3000 events. These events include any of the following events/alarms: BATTERY 1 FAULT SYSTEM AUTO MODE BATTERY 2 FAULT ENGINE LOCKOUT SIGNAL BATTERY 1 LOW VOLTAGE SYSTEM AUTO MODE BATTERY 2 LOW VOLTAGE SYSTEM MANUAL MODE CHARGER 1 FAULT SYSTEM OFF MODE CHARGER 2 FAULT SYSTEM TEST RUN AC POWER FAIL ALARM RESET ENGINE OVERSPEED LOW PRESSURE CONDITION ENGINE FAILED TO START LOW PRESSURE START ENGINE QUIT DELUGE START ENGINE LOW OIL PRESSURE REMOTE START ENGINE HIGH WATER TEMP AC POWER FAIL START PRESSURE DROP HORN SILENCED STOP PUSHBUTTON PRESSED PRESSURE TRANSDUCER FAULT SPEED SWITCH FAILURE CONTACTOR COIL FAILURE Plus any of the 8 programmable auxiliary alarms listed above Every event or alarm that is recorded includes the following data with the recorded event or alarm: • Time and Date of Event or Alarm • System Pressure • Descriptive Text Message of the Event/Alarm • System Auto Mode Status • Engine Running Status • Charger 1 Status • Charger 2 Status • Battery 1 Status • Battery 2 Status Controller Operation Automatic Mode: Starting conditions such as pressure drop, and deluge valve start, will cause the user adjustable sequential start delay timer to begin operation. After start delay is completed the engine will start and the operation will be recorded in the event log. In addition to the sequential start timer the Automatic Weekly Test Start, AC Power Fail Start are programmable by the user through the OlD. All system statistics are continuously monitored and changes are logged into the internal logs. System statistics include, but are not limited to, battery charger volts/amps, battery voltage, and system pressure are continuously monitored and changes are logged. Stopping conditions: Auto engine stop delay, engine lockout, low suction shutdown, automatic stop during automatic weekly test for low oil pressure and high water temperature are all OlD user programmable features. Manual Mode: If a control logic failure occurs, two crank pushbuttons are provided that will bypass all internal logic and allow manual operation of the engine. Options Option H: Space Heater If the ambient atmosphere is especially damp or humid, a space heater rated at 100 watts may be supplied to reduce moisture in the cabinet. A thermostat is supplied as standard with this option. A humidistat may be substituted at no additional charge. Option N: Step-down Transformer When AC voltage exceeds 240 VAC single phase, an integral transformer may be provided for operation from 380 to 600 VAC 50/60 Hz input. Exact voltage and frequency must be specified when ordering. Option W: 24 Inch (609.6 mm) Legs Provided for free standing installations when wall mounting is not practical. If specified, lifting eyes may also be supplied. Enclosure The following NEMA type enclosures are also available: 3R, 4, 4X (Painted Cold Rolled Steel), 4X (304 or 316 Stainless Steel), and 12. Fire Pump Controller For Diesel Driven Fire Pumps _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Metron, Inc. • 1505 West 3rd Ave., • Denver, Colorado 80223 • (303) 592-1903 • EMAIL: sales@metroninc.com • FAX (303) 534-1947 Bulletin FD4 04/09 v1 Specifications General Controller Description The Fire Pump Controller shall be factory assembled, wired and tested as a unit and shall conform to all requirements of the latest edition of NFPA 20, NFPA 70 and be Third Party Listed by Underwriters Laboratories (UL) and Approved by Factory Mutual (FM). The controller shall be available for either 12VDC or 24VDC systems. Controller Equipment Features The controller shall include the following standard features: • NEMA Type 2 drip proof metal wall mount enclosure • Dual Battery chargers, 10 amp microprocessor temperature compensated with integral volt/amp digital display and integral LEDs for indication of AC Power On and Battery Power On • Two outer door mounted crank pushbuttons and two inner panel mounted battery on/off switches • Outer door mounted key operated AUTO, OFF, MANUAL, mode selector switch • Operator Interface Device (OID) with 4 lines by 20 character display with large character backlit LCD capable of being read in both direct sunlight or dark lighting conditions • 12 pushbuttons for easy screen navigation, alarm reset, and horn silencing • Multicolored LED’s for alarm and mode annunciation • LEDs shall be labeled with removable labels to allow for easy field modification if additional alarms and/or language changes • All controller settings shall be programmable through the OlD and shall be protected by two password levels • All features shall be enabled or disabled through the OlD, no jumpers or external wires shall be needed or allowed to activate or de- activate a feature • The system status data shall be displayed on the OlD. The displayed items shall include: Speed Switch Failure, Contactor Coil Failure, System pressure, Battery 1 Voltage, Battery 2 Voltage, Battery 1 Charger Amps, Battery 2 Charger Amps, Current time and date, Number of starts, Total engine run hours, Displayed countdown timers for: Sequential engine start and engine stop, and Time until AC Power fail start, Status of Automatic Stop Setting. LED indication of Loss of DC Power. • Audible horn with horn silence feature for silenceable alarms • Lamp test feature • English or Spanish languages selectable through the OlD • Microprocessor based logic with real time/date clock capable of running a minimum of 14 days without DC power connected to controller and non-volatile flash memory to permanently store the continuous pressure log, event log, alarm log and all user changeable set points and system data. Battery backup of any kind not allowed. • Input and output status LED’s to provide visual indication of each discrete input’s or output’s on/off status • One RS485 Serial Port • MODBUS Communication Protocol via RS485 port • All wiring terminals on PCB’s shall be removable type Auxiliary alarms: As standard the controller shall include 6 discrete auxiliary inputs, 8 form ‘C’ auxiliary relay outputs. These auxiliary inputs and outputs are in addition to those mandated by NFPA 20. All auxiliary inputs, outputs, and OlD LED’s shall be field programmable through the OlD. This permits a multitude of customizable controller configurations to meet each installations unique needs without adding cost to the controller. The use of jumpers, soldering, or other external components is not allowed. The user can select any 8 of the following auxiliary alarms that can be programmed and recorded in the event/alarm logs and annunciated with an LED and output relay contact: ENGINE QUIT FAULT HIGH ENGINE OIL TEMPERATURE PRESSURE TRANSDUCER FAULT LOW JACKET WATER FLOW PUMP ON DEMAND LOW JACKET WATER LEVEL LOW DISCHARGE PRESSURE LOW HYDRAULIC PRESSURE HIGH DISCHARGE PRESSURE GAS DETECTION REMOTE START SIGNAL LOW FIREWATER PRESSURE DELUGE VALVE START AIR DAMPER CLOSED HIGH FUEL LEVEL AIR DAMPER OPEN FUEL SPILL LOW PURGE PRESSURE FUEL TANK RUPTURE LOW GEAR OIL PRESSURE LOW PUMP ROOM TEMPERATURE LOW COOLANT LEVEL RESERVOIR LOW HIGH GEAR OIL TEMPERATURE RESERVOIR EMPTY HIGH VIBRATION RESERVOIR HIGH LOW FUEL PRESSURE FLOW METER ON HIGH EXHAUST TEMPERATURE RELIEF VALVE OPEN HIGH FUEL TEMPERATURE LOW SUCTION PRESSURE PUMP ON DEMAND Data logging: The controller shall have separate data logs for storing system event and pressure data that is readable through the OlD or printable on the internal printer. The data logs shall be stored on a removable SD memory card. The file format shall be standard ASCII text. These logs shall be as follows: Pressure Log: The controller shall have a Pressure log with continuous pressure recording one month of data. Each day’s data shall be in a separate file. The pressure log samples shall be time and date stamped and stored in permanent non-volatile flash memory. The pressure log shall be searchable by each sample, by minute, or by hour. Event Log: The event log shall be capable of storing no less than 3000 events. These events shall include any of the following events/alarms: BATTERY 1 FAULT SYSTEM AUTO MODE BATTERY 2 FAULT ENGINE LOCKOUT SIGNAL BATTERY 1 LOW VOLTAGE SYSTEM AUTO MODE BATTERY 2 LOW VOLTAGE SYSTEM MANUAL MODE CHARGER 1 FAULT SYSTEM OFF MODE CHARGER 2 FAULT SYSTEM TEST RUN AC POWER FAIL ALARM RESET ENGINE OVERSPEED LOW PRESSURE CONDITION ENGINE FAILED TO START LOW PRESSURE START ENGINE QUIT DELUGE START ENGINE LOW OIL PRESSURE REMOTE START ENGINE HIGH WATER TEMP AC POWER FAIL START PRESSURE TRANSDUCER FAULT HORN SILENCED STOP PUSHBUTTON PRESSED PRESSURE DROP SPEED SWITCH FAILURE CONTACTOR COIL FAILURE (PLUS ANY OF THE 8 PROGRAMMABLE AUXILIARY ALARMS LISTED ABOVE) Each event or alarm recorded in the either event log or alarm logs shall have the following data recorded with the event/alarm: • Time and Date of Event or Alarm • System Pressure • Descriptive Text Message of the Event/Alarm • System Auto Mode Status • Engine Running Status • Charger 1 Status • Charger 2 Status • Battery 1 Status • Battery 2 Status The internal logic of the controller shall be capable of operation in a temperature range of 4.4°C to 40°C and high, non-condensing, humidity levels. The controller shall be manufactured by Metron Inc. NOlES: eo!ITACl'ORCOILFAILUIE ~ •i ~ §J§J8EJ§J GEJG~~ ~ DETAIL A ALL DIMENSIONS IN INCHES AND CEN11ME1ERS ([]) 0 ~ 3.0 3 [9 6.5 2.7] 28.0d [71.1] • ~ [I ~ 11111110 SEE DETAIL A O= ~· -u 35. [88. 0 9] [7.6]~ ~ 4.0 [10.1] 28.0 [71.1] BOTIOM VIEW pl! OT pfV!Cf I EGENp R1. CID-OPERATOR INTERFACE DEVICE R2. AUTO-OFF-MANUAL SWITCH R3. MANUAL CRANK 1 PUSH BUTTON R4. MANUAL CRANK 2 PUSH BUTTON R5. STOP PUSH BUTTON RS. ALARM HORN ENCLCSURE1 NEMA 2 PAINTED STEEL IWMN 1-12-04 i.;a:;;;om;;::''"°':e."i'IF.,._~2-;;.;0:;;B-;;.;O"I~ METRON, INC. ""° m.Jt. 2-06-0 tEMIEI\ co. OUTLINE DIMENSIONS MODEL FD4 -MICROPROCESSOR ENGINE DRIVEN FIRE PUMP CONlROLLER ...,_ CD336258 40 60 70 80 110 FU-20 BATIERY """"'"" BATIERY 1 1--~'""'1-t<'~ (~+~):"":::::;::::i f--+"t"-------t-"'"'I • t---.----t.j1l1--=-, I I I " ~: ~: ~+;---~-., I I ENBI£ : I L...f4L-TERNA'RJR I : ~-e--1 I I I I I I : I BATIERY 2 : ·---+---t.j111--=-., " .. ,, "'""' """ I I I I I I I I rt-~~~~-+-~--Hf---~~~~~~~~~~~~"t-111 ____________ ., .. .. BAT2 SYfTOt ""' " .. .. .. .. " BATTl1 atANK 80 -1..!!71 71 • • BATTf2 CRANK 91 -1..!!72 72 • • • m ... BATIERY~ II "1E•::J"'!i:~.,f-''"'"'----(S)--ff--<i,_ ____ __,,,~ " COM NC BATIERY~ f2 IN 04 '""'i ,!l oe f{l]f--"100~----500 04-----~"'"" ~ ENGKLDCl«lfr ~----if----- DELUGE VALVE ~-----:lf------ AEllOlE START ~----11------ AUX IN fl/PREnllE SW. ~--------o-r---I AUX IN 1'l/U111 INTAICE SW. : ~ ~ _,. AUX fl I _,___ I ~----o o---~ MIX INPUT 14 I ~----o---1..,_o----+ AUX INPUT f5 I ~--------o--1..,_o----~ AUX INPUT fa I _,___ I ~--------0 o----...J l£GENO: [I] -MB = FD4 MOlHERBOARD 1/0 lERMINAL (JI] -DB = FD4 DAUGHlERBOARO 1/0 lERMINAL (NOTE 1)-TO REDUCE lHE RISK Of ARE, REPLACE ONLY \\llH -we • D7 • DB 100 ... "' 0 oi ~ §) §) El El §] GBGG~ ~ amc ..... SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM FD4 DIESEL ENGINE -SAME TIPE AND RATING Of FUSE AS ORIGINALLY INSTALLED. FIRE PUMP CONTROLLER 71 • 72 1D , ... B STAR'IER CONTACTCR I SCI I -------0---., STAR'IER CONTACTOR : SC2 I -------0----. I +we 9.IPPLEDI GINE RUhNNG BY opus I --I~----• I I I I I I I ~----' : I OI. PRESSllRE I ---<>;ro---+ I .. ,.. .... l ----~-,. SYS1DI ENGINE 04ASSIS -'t'DC 11¥11 GAOUN> -WC ("1) Ml 02-02-04 u 02-00-04 ~M~ INC. mJt 02-08-04 DENVB\ CXl CS33613E --N1S ..... 1CF2 HORN200 """" -WC ""' ( ... ) B ... ENGINE otASBIS GROINJ-WC ~ I I I I I I I FUEL IWNOI) : -------&---t ir:::-~~~~~~~~~_J!!!..~~~~~~--l~~~~~~~--f ENCINESTOPSOlENOml 'I " -------§---4 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -MOlHERBOARD DAUGHlERBOARD lllm< .AJMPER SETTINGS ' JUMPER SETTINGS GND I AINOI J17,Jl8 0-1llNIFS CJfARGER .... mA OR (OPTION J) SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM 1..,1...,. °<~~ FD4 DIESEL ENGINE FIRE PUMP CONTROLLER .. 02-02-04 u. 02-06-04 ,,.,,. 02-06-04 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I & ENCIME otASSIS .......,_""' ~ MEl'ROIC, INC. DENVEl\00 CS33613E --.,. _,. 2 CF 2 REVISIONS SYM DESCRIPTION DATE APPROVED 620881 ASSEMBLY NOTES: E MOD. NOTES & DIM ECO 2995 CONDULET, 1/2"', LB19 (1290) CONDULET GASKET (1663) CONDULET COVER (1430) BRASS NIPPLE, 1/2"' CLOSE (1856) REDUCER 2"' PIPE THREAD (1838) UNION, #68C-6-8 3/8"" TUBING TO 1/2"" MALE PIPE (4048) BRASS TUBING 3/8"'X L (3119) UNION, #66C-6-2 3/8"' TUBING TO 1 /8"' PIPE (1844) LIQUID LEVEL SW. DELAVAL #LS-1800 (1075) 1. AA10519-1 REFERS TO DOC. 348 & 349 TO DETERMINE LENGTH PLUS 4.8"'. THIS SWITCH CLOSES ON FALLING LIQUID LEVEL. 2. AA10519-2 REFERS TO LENGTH OF ASSEMBLY WHICH SHOULD BE A TOTAL OF 24.0"' WHERE DIM IS SHOWN. THIS SWITCH CLOSES ON RISING LIQUID LEVEL. DRAWN J.V. (REDWN) 9-24-96 8-19-97 L + 4.8 (SEE NOTE 1) OR 24.0 (SEE NOTE 2) X.lo. TOLERANCES ARE: . x ± .030 .xx ± .015 .XXX ± .005 ANGLES ± O' 30' CHECK JSW 10-8-96 C-meffeuo METRON, INC . DENVER, CO REMOVE BURRS & SHARP CORNERS APPD X.lo. 10-14-96 ASSEMBLY, LIQUID LEVEL SWITCH ENGINE FIRE PUMP CONTROLLER AA10519E SCALE N. T.S. SHEET 1 OF 1 JOCKEY PUMP DATA 20 Dimensions and Weights 2SV Series 3500 RPM Stage Frame (1-Phase) Frame (3-Phase) L2 D1 (max.) Weights (lb) ODP TEFC ODP TEFC HP L1 ODP TEFC L3 L4 L5 M1 (ref.) M2 (ref.) ODP TEFC Liquid End ODP TEFC 2 ¾ 12.69 10.75 9.94 11.69 11.69 5.06 5.19 6.19 21 24 28 3 1 13.63 10.63 11.19 12.69 12.69 6.19 22 32 40 4 1½ 14.63 10.69 13.63 13.63 5.75 24 40 43 5 56C 56C 2 15.63 11.19 12.06 8.88 14.63 14.63 25 43 51 6 16.63 9.88 15.63 15.63 5.56 7.19 26 7 17.56 10.81 16.63 16.63 7.19 28 8 3 18.56 11.56 13.88 11.81 17.56 17.56 5.50 30 51 56 9 19.56 12.81 18.56 18.56 31 11 21.50 14.75 20.56 20.56 33 13 182-4TC 182-4TC 5 23.50 16.75 22.50 35 75 85 15 25.44 18.69 24.44 39 16 26.44 13.94 15.44 26.44 6.88 6.63 8.50 8.50 40 18 28.44 28.44 42 20 184TC 184TC 7½ 30.44 30.44 44 101 124 22 32.44 32.44 46 L1 L1 +L2 L2 D1 FILL 3/8 BSP DRAIN3/8 BSP 9.84(250)1.77 (45) 2.95(75) M1REF M2REF L1 L1 +L2 L2 FILL 3/8 BSP DRAIN3/8 BSP 4.92(125)1.77(45) 2.95(75) L3 Ø 3.94 B.C.(100)Ø .71 (18)4 HOLES 5.51(140) 1¼" CLASS 300 6.30 (160).79(20) 1.97(50) 1¼ NPT 1¼" NPT L4 + L2(overall) L4 (liquid end) L5 + L2(overall) L5 (liquid end) 12.60(320)8.27(210) 1.97 (50)1.64 (41.7) SVC FLANGE SVA SVB SVD VICTAULIC All dimensions are in inches (mm). 7.09 (180) 3.94 (100)Ø .51 (13) 21 2SV Curve 3500 RPM 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 0 10 15 45 US GPM FEET TO T A L D Y N A M I C H E A D CAPACITY 40 50 60 EF F % 2SV 60 Hz3500 RPM 0 0.5 HP / S T AG E 0 5 m3/h 0 50 100 150 200 250 300METERS 800 900 0 8 14 30 4321 10 6 kW / S T AG E 0 .30 .20 .10 5 4 2 0.25 40352520 12 275 225 125 175 75 25 NP S H r 0 2 4 1 3 (m)(ft) * For vertical shaft installation only. 16 – 22 STAGES* 2 – 15 STAGES 22 STAGE 20 STAGE 18 STAGE 13 STAGE 11 STAGE 9 STAGE 8 STAGE 6 STAGE 5 STAGE 4 STAGE 3 STAGE 2 STAGE 7 STAGE Eff. BHP 16 STAGE 15 STAGE JOCKEY PUMP CONTROLLER DATA Metron M-15 A DIVISION OF HUBBELL Bulletin MP15 V12 Series MP15 Micro Processor Full Voltage, Across the Line MP15 Jockey Pump Controller Metron’s Model MP15 Jockey Pump is small, lightweight, technologically advanced microprocessor based controller intended for across-the-line starting of squirrel cage motors. MP15 controllers are for fire protection system applications where it is desirable to maintain uniform system water pressure by the use of an automatic pressure maintenance pump. The MP15 Jockey Pump Controller serves over-all system efficiency by detecting minor fire protection water system leakage. By bringing jockey or make-up pumps on line, they maintain pressure within set point limits without unnecessary cycling of the main fire pump. A DIVISION OF HUBBELL Bulletin MP15 V12 Standard and Optional Features Solid State contactor drive for increased reliability Field updatable via USB Multilingual System pressure readout without opening the door Combination motor protector through door disconnect provides overload and short circuit protection without fuses Horsepower rated motor starter HAND-OFF-AUTO selector switch Minimum Run timer Pump Start Delay timer Power Available LED Pump Running LED Event history Data log Door mounted backlit LCD display/user interface with adjustable back lighting. Control transformer Diagnostic LED’s 0-600 PSI Transducer Standard Features Options USB enhanced data logging capability Power and communications, eight channel I/O expansion board with Form C contacts Space heater with thermostat Consult factory for additional options. Suitable for use as Service Equipment 600 PSI Type 4 & 4X enclosures Tropicalization CE approved (standard on Eledyne models) Four user programmable output relays A DIVISION OF HUBBELL Bulletin MP15 V12 Specifications Features The Fire Jockey Pump Controller shall be factory assembled, wired and tested as a unit and shall conform to all requirements of the latest edition of NFPA 20, NFPA 70 and be Third Party Listed by Underwriters Laboratories (UL) 508A standards for industrial controls. The controller shall be available for 208, 230, 380-415, or 480 volt three phases and 115,208,240 single phase. Settings shall be programmable through the OID display. 3 pushbuttons for easy screen navigation All features shall be enabled or disabled through the OID The system status data shall be displayed on the OID. The displayed items shall include: System pressure, System Events and Notifications, Current time and date Short circuit rating 100KA @ 115-240VVAC, 50KA @380-480 VAC, 25KA @ 575-600 VAC The controller shall have separate data logs for storing system data that is readable through the OID The event log shall be capable of storing no less than 3000 events The internal logic of the controller shall be capable of operation in a temperature range of 5oC – 50oC and high, non-condensing, humidity levels. Approvals Listed by Underwriters Laboratories in accordance with UL508A, Standard for Industrial Controls. CE – Optional EMC Tested Ratings 120V-600V, 50/60Hz, single phase or 3 phase Short circuit rating 100KA @ 115-240VVAC, 50KA @380-480 VAC, 25KA @ 575-600 VAC Type 3R enclosure Operational temperature 42o F -122oF (5oC – 50oC) 0-600 psi pressure transducer Features System pressure readout without opening the door Combination motor protector through the door disconnect provides fuseless overload and short circuit protection Horsepower rated motor starter HAND-OFF-AUTO selector switch Minimum Run timer Pump Start Delay timer Power Available LED Pump Running LED Event history Data log Door mounted backlit LCD display/user interface with adjustable back lighting. Control transformer Diagnostic LED’s Solid State contactor drive for increased reliability Field updatable via USB Multilingual NEMA Type3 Rd r ip proof metal freesstanding enclosure 4 I 3 ----4.o-.o: .OC>-- j-3.0D--j ISCONNECT II\ Ol SWITCH "" B . . I L ·~·1~ 13.00 .O~A. E!ll!ll!I • n: 12 22 SWITCH DIGITAL DISPLAY . v u • /nAlElCONNECTION n / .I ~/ f "I~ {s -·- SINGLE PHASE HP VAC . 25 -0.5 115 .25 - 1 200 .25 - 1 240 A THREE PHASE HP VAC .25 - 2 200 .25 - 2 208 .25 - 3 240 .25 - 5 380/415 .25 - 5 460/480 .25 -7.5 575/600 4 I 3 • 2 I 1 REVISIONS REV. DATE DESCRIPTION BY -8.00-12.:: [ I ..... ..... - -7.00-~.QC>-- -ro 0 . 1156 ] 13 00 1200 . I Q;;l:I + ==i-0 0 NOTES: 1. FIELD TERMINAL WILL ACCEPT COPPER WIRE ONLY. 2. MOTOR TERMINALS VARY WIDELY BETWEEN MANUFACTURERS. PLEASE REFER TO MOTOR CONNECTION DIAGRAM ON THE MOTOR FOR VERIFICATION . 3. PROPER PHASE SEQUENCE {A,B,C) SHOULD BE OBSERVED, TO MAINTAIN PROPER MOTOR ROTATION. 4. INCOMING CABLE SIZE TO BE 125% OF MOTOR FULL LOAD CURRENT. REFER TO WIRE SIZE TABLES IN NFPA 70. HCJW801000 SMALL STANDARD ENCLOSURE . o.x ± .050 I I ± .002 DIMEN. ~ o.xx -± .020 I " .~ -± ,. ~eli o.xxx -± .005 ~~ -UNDIM. -/!'.:::. DATA & OUTLINE DRAWING MP15 MICRO JOCKEY FIRE PUMP CONTROLLER NEMo\ 3R SIW.L ENCLOSURE 90'±T R.M.S. IAlE: B/212013 DR.S. JUDD I CK. I APPR. (<fi{il>] Division of1~~1ub~ll !CD, Inc. DRG. NO. 4301 Cheyenne Drtve Ardldale, N.C. 27263 l OF' 1 HCMPlSD-801-•2 I 1 B ~ A r----------1 COMPONENTS FUNCTION LOCATION CONTACTS L 1 I OLR I 1MC 1 0--+-0 -.rY .ri T1 I --~ ' 0 1MC MOTOR CONTACTOR I I 12 2 I I 1PS PRESSURE TRANSDUCER 18 L3 I I I I 3 0--+-0 ---T3 --0 L __________ J HOA HAND/OFF /AUTO SELECTOR SW. 1.) 4 MCP MCP MOTOR CIRCUIT PROTECTOR 5 I 6 7 8 1 3 g 1 3 -10 J4 " 0 I Jl + 4 u ·B 12VDC 5 51 J 11 s B I 1 12 000000 SPD1 -+ '--SPD2 2 1 HAND OfF AU TO 13 0 v Al MC A2 ~"i/ POWER ~r: :__ NOTES FOR FIELD WIRING: METRON -HUBBELL SUPPLY • 1) USE COPPER WIRING ONLY EXCEPT 14 MICRO-JOCKEY I J2 AT TERMINALS MARKED CU-AL, HC90771002 HOA 3 1sw-1 4 15 N-:):- 60'C FOR TERMINALS RA TED L H-0-A LESS THAN 100 AMPS IJ3 4-20mA f----1 TRANSDUCER I 3 -:!:-SWITCH SENSOR 1 16 17 18 1 ~ ., '. dl\lr~I 1-......... "i.1r'-' ·-OIMEN . ~ STANDARD SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM OPTIONS UST -OPTIONS MARKED Ga·•-... ·tttt? . .. MP15 MICRO JOCKEY PUMP CONTROU.ER >.'in ·l'fl'I)! WITH AN "X" ARE INCLUDED ..... ~ .... UNOIM. SINGLE PHASE C H l M S U V X Y CUSTOM CADD NO.: H~P15S1P 90··· I I I I I I I I I x IU4.S. DATE :10/17/2013 DR. DAMA I CK. I APPR. Cii~ ~Im METRON DRG. NO. DMIDI d HlbbeNCD, Inc. '4301 0111','emB DrlYe Ata!dale, N.C. 27263 1 OF 1 HCMP15S1P FLOW METER DATA PUMP GPM 25 50 100 150 200 50 3 50 500 750 1000 1250 0 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 Optional to Pump Inlet VENTURI SYSTEM MODEL NO . K-2 5-1'/• 616 K-50-2 685 K100-2 ''2 746 K-150-3 766 K-200 -3 766 K-250 -4 K-300-4 K-450 -4 -500-5 K-750-6 743 K-1000-6 K-1250-6 K-1500-8 K-2000-8 K-2500 -8 K-3000-8 750 K-3500-10 755 K-4000-10 755 K-4500-10 755) K-5000-12 (750 I I I 11>1 Supply from City Main or Reservoir PIPE SIZE 1 '//' 2" 2 ''2" 3" 3" 4" 4" 4" 5" 6" 6" 6" 8" 8" 8" 8" 1 O" 1 O" 1 O" 12" -RATING 500 PSI - (BUTT WELD , GROOVED ENDS & 300 # FLANGED) -RATING 275 PSI - (FOR 150 #FLANGED UNITS ONLY) A CA LIBRATED VENTURI AND ATTACHED GPM METER INSTALLED O N THE DISCHARGE OF A FIRE PUMP TO ACCURATELY DETERMINE PUMP PERFORMANCE. 4 '//' DIAL METER IS SHIPPED FOR MOUNTING ON VENTURI BRACKET. IF M ET ER IS TO BE REMOTE MOUNTED, CONSULT FAC T ORY ON SPEC IA L HOSE L ENGTHS. LISTED BELOW ARE THE MOST COMMON MODEL "K " FM APPROVED PUMP GPM/LINE SIZE COMBINATIONS OF FIRE PUMP TEST METERS. DUAL LPM/GPM SCALES AVAILABLE. METER RANGE WELDED or GROOVED *FLANGED VENTURI LENGTH MIN . & MAX. GPM VENTURI LENGTH 150# RF 300# RF 12.5-50 Threaded onl 3 3//' 25-100 Threaded on l 4 '//' 50 -200 3" W ELD 4 " 9 ''2" 10" 75-300 3 ''2 " WELD 4 3/s" 9" 10 '//' 100-400 3 ''2 " WEL D 4 3/s" 9" 1 O'//' 125-500 3 ''2 " WELD 3 3//' 9 ''2" 10 3//' 150-600 3 1/2 11 WE L D 3 3//' 9 ''2" 10 3//' 225-900 3 '/,'' WELD 3 3//' 9 ''2" 10 3//' 250-1000 5" 12 " 13 '//' 37 5-1500 6" 13 " 14 '//' 500 -2000 6" 13" 14 '/4' 625-2500 6" 13" 14 '/4' 750-3000 7" 15" 16 '/4' 1000-4000 7" 15" 16 '/4' 1250-5000 7" 15" 16 '//' 1500-6000 7" 15" 16 '/.'' 1750-7000 8" 16" 17 3/4' 2000-8000 8" 16" 17 3//' 2250-9000 8" 16" 173//' 2500-10000 12" 21 " 22 3/4' GERAND GPM METER -VENTURI PACKAGE *SPECIFY RAISED OR FLAT FACE OSY or Indicating Butterf ly By -Pass Valve \. -'4-._F_lo_w_ F low ... SUGG ESTED PIPING DIAGRAM "A " OSY Valve / To System OPERATING INSTRUCTIONS FOR GERAND FIRE PUMP TEST METER 1. Close System OSY Valve "A". 2. Open OSY By -Pass Valve and "B" Butterfly Throttle Valve . 3. Purge meter located on Venturi as follows: Open station shut-off valves (below meter) and vent valves (above meter). When a steady stream of water is passing through each plastic hose, meter is purged of air. Close vent valves after air purging . 4. Start Fire Pump and read meter in GPM . 5. Refer to pump GPM requirement and adjust throttle valve for this requiremen t. 6. After test. open OSY Valve "A" and close By-Pass and "B" Valves . GERAND ENGINEERING CO. 11504 K-TEL DRIVE• M I NNETONKA, MN 55343 •PHONE: 952-374-1320 • FAX: 952-374-1758 VALVE & FITTING DATA PROJECT INFORMATION APPROVAL STAMP Project:q Approved Address:q Approved as noted Contractor:q Not approved Engineer:Remarks: Submittal Date: Notes 1: Notes 2: MUELLER® Description Material Material Standard G-1 Cap Nut Bronze ASTM B62 G-3 Hand Wheel Cast Iron ASTM A126 CL.B G-4 Washer Brass G-5 Bush Nut Bronze ASTM B584 G-7 Gland Nut Bronze ASTM B21 Alloy 464 G-8 Packing Gland Ductile Iron ASTM A536 Grade 65-45-12 G-10 Gland Bolt Stainless Steel Type 304 G-11††Yo ke Bolt & Nut Stainless Steel Type 304 G-16 Bonnet Bolts & Nuts Stainless Steel Type 304 G-23 Stem Packing Lubricated Flax G-206 Guide Cap Bearings Celcon G-209 Wedge, Rubber Encapsulated Cast Iron**ASTM A126 CL.B G-211 Bonnet Gasket Rubber ASTM D2000 G-212 Body Cast Iron ASTM A126 CL.B G-213 Stem Bronze ASTM B138 G-214†Bonnet & Yo ke w/Bushing Cast Iron ASTM A126 CL.B G-215††Bonnet Cast Iron ASTM A126 CL.B G-216††Yo ke Cast Iron ASTM A126 CL.B G-217 O-ring Nitrile ASTM D2000 G-218 Disc Nut Bronze ASTM B62 G-219 Stem Nut Pin Stainless Steel Type 304 Catalog Part No. Mueller ul/FM - 9.05 O.S.&Y. Resilient Wedge Gate Valve • 2-1/2", 3", 4", 6", 8", 10" and 12" SIZES • MEETS OR EXCEEdS aLL aPPLICaBLE REQUIREMEnTS OF UL 262 and FM 120/1130 SPECIFICaTIOnS and COMPLIES WITH nSF-61 • IROn BOdY WITH MUELLER® PRO-GaRd™ FUSIOn EPOXY COaTEd InTERIOR & EXTERIOR SURFaCES • OUTSIdE SCREW and YOKE (O.S.&Y.) • FLanGEd End dIMEnSIOnS and dRILLInG • RUBBER EnCaPSULaTEd IROn WEdGE • adJUSTaBLE PaCKInG • HandWHEEL – OPEn LEFT OR OPEn RIGHT • 200 PSIG (1379KPa) MaXIMUM WORKInG PRESSURE - 400 PSIG (2758 KPa) STaTIC TEST • EPOXY COaTInG MEETS OR EXCEEdS anSI/aWWa C550 and COMPLIES WITH nSF-61 See page B-1-22 for ordering insturctions. *All dimensions are in inches. All weights are in pounds and are approximate. ** Fully encapsulated in molded rubber with no iron exposed. † 2-1/2" - 6" sizes have a one-piece bonnet & yoke. ††8" - 12" sizes have a two-piece bonnet & yoke. q R-2360-6: O.S.&Y. RESILIEnT WEdGE GaTE VaLVE WITH FLanGE EndS PARTS LIST DIMENSIONS Dimension*2-1/2"3"4"6"8"10"12" A 19.50"19.25"23.68"31.38"38.50"47.00"53.50" AA 15.75"15.50"19.00"24.50"29.50"35.75"40.50" E 7.00"7.00"10.00"12.00"14.00"16.00"16.00" R 7.00"7.50"9.00"11.00"13.50"16.00"19.00" FF 7.50"8.00"9.00"10.50"11.50"13.00"14.00" UU 5.50"6.00"7.50"9.50"11.75"14.25"17.00" FFF (number and size of holes)4--.75"4--.75"8--.75"8--.88"8--.88"12--1"12--1" Turns to open 11 11 14 20.5 27 33.5 39 Weight (lbs.)*68 72 130 194 289 448 596 Size FF Options • StainleSS Steel faStenerS: type 304 or 316 • aStM B98-C66100/H02 SteM DIMENSIONS C A B TYPICAL 2 1/2 – 3”/65 – 80 MM R A 3 C ED 1J 2 B K P 2 1 3 ½" NPT Upstream Drain ½" NPT Downstream Drain 2" NPT (Drain Optional) TYPICAL 4 – 8”/100 – 200 MM A C ED J 2 1 P B K 1 2 ½" NPT Upstream Drain ½" NPT Downstream Drain TYPICAL 10 – 12”/250 – 300 MM Size Dimensions- Inches/millimeters Approx. Wgt. Ea. Nominal Size Inches mm Actual Outside Diameter Inches mm E to E A B C D E J K P R Lbs. kg 2 1/2 2.875 3.88 4.26 3.57 ——————3.6 65 73.0 99 108 91 1.6 76.1 mm 3.000 3.88 4.26 3.57 ——————3.6 76.1 99 108 91 1.6 3 3.500 4.25 5.06 4.17 ——————4.5 80 88.9 108 129 106 2.0 4 †4.500 9.63 6.00 3.88 2.75 3.50 2.00 4.50 3.50 3.35 20.0 100 114.3 245 152 99 70 89 51 114 89 85 9.1 5 †5.563 10.50 6.80 4.50 —4.17 2.15 5.88 4.08 3.98 27.0 125 141.3 267 173 114 106 55 149 104 101 12.3 139.7 mm †5.500 10.50 6.80 4.50 —4.17 2.15 5.88 4.08 3.98 27.0 139.7 267 173 114 106 55 149 104 101 12.3 6 †6.625 11.50 8.00 5.00 —4.50 2.38 6.67 4.73 3.89 38.0 150 168.3 292 203 127 114 61 169 120 99 17.2 165.1 mm 6.500 11.50 8.00 5.00 —4.50 2.38 6.67 4.73 3.89 38.0 165.1 292 203 127 114 61 169 120 99 17.2 8 †8.625 14.00 9.88 6.06 5.05 5.65 2.15 8.85 5.65 5.75 64.0 200 219.1 356 251 154 128 144 55 225 144 146 29.0 10 10.750 17.00 12.00 7.09 5.96 6.69 2.15 10.92 6.73 —100.0 250 273.0 432 305 180 151 170 55 277 171 45.4 12 12.750 19.50 14.00 8.06 6.91 7.64 2.51 12.81 7.73 —140.0 300 323.9 495 356 205 176 194 64 925 196 63.5 † VdS Approved Series 717 FireLock check valve is a CAD-developed design that is hydrodynamically efficient. A totally rubber encapsulated disc on 4 – 12"/100 – 300 mm sizes provides superior corrosion resistance. This single disc design incorporates a spring assisted feature for non-slamming operation. For systems requiring a Riser Check option refer to section 10.09. The 4"/100 mm and larger sizes are provided with upstream and downstream drains and a welded-in nickel seat design. All sizes of Series 717 can be installed in the vertical or horizontal position to provide leak-free sealing under conditions as low as five feet of head. Each valve is factory tested to 500 psi/3440 kPa. The 2 1/2 and 3"/65 and 80 mm sizes are UL/ ULC Listed and 4"/100 mm sizes and larger are UL/ULC Listed and FM Approved for services up to 250 psi/1725 kPa. Sizes 4 – 8"/100 – 200 mm (except 165.1 mm size) are VdS approved. Grooved ends allow fast, easy installation with just two Victaulic couplings or the valve may be mounted to flanged (ANSI CL.150) equipment using either to Victaulic Style 741 Vic-Flange® or Style 744 FireLock flange adapters on either end. 10.08_1 FireLock® Check Valves SERIES 717 10.08IPS CARBON STEEL PIPE - FIRE PROTECTION VALVES JOB/OWNER CONTRACTOR ENGINEER System No. __________________________Submitted By ________________________Spec Sect ____________ Para __________ Location ____________________________Date ________________________________Approved ___________________________ Date ________________________________ WWW.VICTAULIC.COM VICTAULIC IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF VICTAULIC COMPANY. © 2007 VICTAULIC COMPANY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. PRINTED IN THE USA. REV_H SEE VICTAULIC PUBLICATION 10.01 FOR DETAILS MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS Body: Ductile iron conforming to ASTM A-536, grade 65-45-12. Ductile iron conforming to ASTM A-395, grade 65-45-15, is available upon special request. 2 1/2 – 3"/65 – 80 mm sizes PPS coated. 4 – 12"/100 – 300 mm sizes painted black enamel. Body Seat: 21/2 – 3"/65 – 80 mm sizes PPS coated. 4 – 12"/100 – 300 mm integrally welded on nickel alloy. Disc Seal or Coating: • Grade “E” EPDM EPDM (Green color code). Temperature range –30°F to +230°F/–34°C to +110°C. Recommended for cold and hot water service within the specified temperature range plus a variety of dilute acids, oil-free air and many chemical services. UL classified in accordance with ANSI/NSF 61 for cold +86°F/+30°C and hot +180°F/+82°C potable water service. NOT RECOMMENDED FOR PETROLEUM SERVICES. * Services listed are General Service Recommendations only. It should be noted that there are services for which these gaskets are not recommended. Reference should always be made to the latest Victaulic Gasket Selection Guide for specific gasket service recommendations and for a listing of services which are not recommended. Discs: • 2 1/2 – 3"/65 – 80 mm Aluminum bronze conforming to ASTM B-148 with Grade “E” Seal. • 4 – 12"/100 – 300 mm ductile iron conforming to ASTM A-536, grade 65-45-12, fully encapsulated in Grade “E” elastomer. Shaft: 2 1/2 – 3"/65 – 80 mm Type 416 stainless steel. 4 – 12"/100 – 300 mm Type 316 stainless steel. Spring: All sizes Type 302/304 stainless steel. Shaft Plug: 2 1/2 – 3"/65 – 80 mm only; SAE Hex Socket Type conforming to ASTM A-576, cadmium plated to military specifications QQ-P-416A, class 3 type 2. 4 – 12"/100 – 300 mm only; carbon steel zinc plated to ASTM B-633. Pipe Plug: 4 – 12"/100 – 300 mm only; carbon steel zinc plated to ASTM B-633. 10.08_2 FireLock® Check Valves SERIES 717 10.08IPS CARBON STEEL PIPE - FIRE PROTECTION VALVES www.victaulic.com VICTAULIC IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF VICTAULIC COMPANY. © 2007 VICTAULIC COMPANY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. PRINTED IN THE USA. REV_H FLOW CHARACTERISTICS The chart below expresses the flow of water at 65ºF/18ºC through a full open valve. 800 3,000 8,000 6.05.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.00.90.80.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 10 20 30 40 50 60 80 100 200 300 400 600 1,000 2,000 4,000 6,000 10,000 20,000 2 ½" & 7 6 . 1 m m 5" & 1 3 9 . 7 m m 3"4"8"6" & 1 6 5 . 1 m m 10"12" P R E S S U R E D R O P – p s i FLOW RATE – G.P.M. 10.08_3 FireLock® Check Valves SERIES 717 10.08IPS CARBON STEEL PIPE - FIRE PROTECTION VALVES www.victaulic.com VICTAULIC IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF VICTAULIC COMPANY. © 2007 VICTAULIC COMPANY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. PRINTED IN THE USA. REV_H WARRANTY This product shall be manufactured by Victaulic or to Victaulic specifications. All products to be installed in accordance with current Victaulic installation/assembly instructions. Victaulic reserves the right to change product specifications, designs and standard equipment without notice and without incurring obligations. NOTE Refer to the Warranty section of the current Price List or contact Victaulic for details. Reference should always be made to the I-100 Victaulic Field Installation Handbook for the product you are installing. Handbooks are included with each shipment of Victaulic products for complete installation and assembly data, and are available in PDF format on our website at www.victaulic.com. INSTALLATION 10.08 FireLock® Check Valves SERIES 717 10.08IPS CARBON STEEL PIPE - FIRE PROTECTION VALVES WCAS-77LKQ6 For complete contact information, visit www.victaulic.com 10.08 1479 REV H UPDATED 10/2007 VICTAULIC IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF VICTAULIC COMPANY. © 2007 VICTAULIC COMPANY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. PRINTED IN THE USA. MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS The Series 705W butterfly valve features an approved weatherproof actuator housing approved for indoor or outdoor use. It has a ductile iron body and disc with EPDM disc coating. The body is coated with a heat fused polyphenylene sulfide blend to meet FM requirements. Designed for fire protection services only. Series 705W valve is UL Listed and FM Approved for 300 psi/2065 kPa service. Contact Victaulic for details of agency approvals. WEATHERPROOF ACTUATOR Supervisory switches that monitor the valve in the fully open position for valves are available 2 1/2 – 12"/65 – 300 mm pre-wired (PW). OPTIONAL SUPPLY-SIDE TAP Series 705W valves are available with a 1/2" NPT supply side tap designed to allow direct water supply connection to Victaulic FireLock actuated fire protection valves. See separate drawings below. This is an optional feature and must be clearly noted on all orders. Body: Ductile iron conforming to ASTM A-536, coated with polyphenylene sulfide blend. Disc: Ductile iron conforming to ASTM A-536, various grades, EPDM coated. Disc Coating: • Grade “E” EPDM EPDM (Green color code). Temperature range –30°F to +230°F/–34°C to +110°C. Recommended for cold and hot water service within the specified temperature range plus a variety of dilute acids, oil-free air and many chemical services. UL classified in accordance with ANSI/NSF 61 for cold +86°F/+30°C and hot +180°F/+82°C potable water service. NOT RECOMMENDED FOR PETROLEUM SERVICES. Stem Bearings: Teflon impregnated fiberglass with stainless steel backing. Stem Bearing Nuts: Type 416 Stainless Steel. Tap Plug: Carbon steel, plated. O-Ring: EPDM Bracket: Carbon steel, painted. Actuator: • 21/2 – 8"/65 – 200 mm: Bronze traveling nut on a steel lead screw, in a ductile iron housing. • 10 – 12"/250 – 300 mm: Steel worm and cast iron quadrant gear, in a cast iron housing. 10.18_1 FireLock® Butterfly Valve SERIES 705W WITH WEATHERPROOF ACTUATOR 10.18IPS CARBON STEEL PIPE – FIRE PROTECTION VALVES JOB/OWNER CONTRACTOR ENGINEER System No. __________________________Submitted By ________________________Spec Sect ____________ Para __________ Location ____________________________Date ________________________________Approved ___________________________ Date ________________________________ www.victaulic.com VICTAULIC IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF VICTAULIC COMPANY. © 2006 VICTAULIC COMPANY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. PRINTED IN THE USA. REV_G MEA: 276-99-E CSFM: 7770-0531:113 0026 MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS Handwheel: Size Version Inches mm cULus, LPCB, FM Black Inches mm VdS * Red mm 2 1/2 – 4 3.0 12565 – 100 76.2 5 – 6 4.5 200125 – 150 114.3 8 160 mm 250200 10 – 12 9 250 – 300 225 *VdS version not UL Listed, FM Approved or LPCB Approved. 10.18_2 FireLock® Butterfly Valve SERIES 705W WITH WEATHERPROOF ACTUATOR 10.18IPS CARBON STEEL PIPE – FIRE PROTECTION VALVES www.victaulic.com VICTAULIC IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF VICTAULIC COMPANY. © 2006 VICTAULIC COMPANY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. PRINTED IN THE USA.. REV_G DIMENSIONS – Size Dimensions – inches/millimeters Aprx. Wgt. Each Nominal Size inches mm Actual Outside Diameter inches mm End to End “A” Hgt. “B”“E”“F”“J”“O”“N” ‡“P” ‡lbs/kg 2 1/2 2.875 3.77 8.76 —4.21 6.08 3.00 0.00 *0.75 8.3 65 73.0 95.6 222.5 106.9 154.4 76.2 0.0 *19.1 3.8 76.1 mm 3.000 3.77 8.76 —4.21 6.08 3.00 0.00 *0.75 8.3 76.1 95.6 222.5 106.9 154.4 76.2 0.0 *19.1 3.8 3 3.500 3.77 9.40 0.08 4.21 6.08 3.00 0.00 *0.75 8.9 80 88.9 95.6 238.8 2.0 106.9 154.4 76.2 0.0 *19.1 4.0 4 4.500 4.63 10.84 0.07 6.01 6.98 3.00 0.73 1.13 14.9 100 114.3 117.6 275.3 1.8 152.7 177.3 76.2 18.5 28.7 6.8 139.7 mm 5.500 5.88 12.38 0.43 6.01 8.57 4.50 ——21.0 139.7 149.4 314.5 10.9 152.7 217.7 114.3 9.5 5 5.563 5.88 12.38 0.43 6.01 8.57 4.50 ——21.0 125 141.3 149.4 314.5 10.9 152.7 217.7 114.3 9.5 165.1 mm 6.500 5.88 13.41 1.00 7.51 9.32 4.50 1.60 1.88 26.5 165.1 149.4 340.6 25.4 190.8 236.7 114.3 40.6 47.8 12.0 6 6.625 5.88 13.41 1.00 7.51 9.32 4.50 1.60 1.88 26.5 150 168.3 149.4 340.6 25.4 190.8 236.7 114.3 40.6 47.8 12.0 8 8.625 5.33 16.50 1.27 9.65 10.98 6.30 0.00 *0.68 43.0 200 219.1 135.4 419.1 32.3 245.1 278.9 160.0 0.0 *17.3 19.5 10 10.750 6.40 19.14 1.72 12.20 16.19 9.00 ——80.0 250 273.0 162.6 486.2 43.7 309.9 411.2 228.6 36.3 12 12.750 6.50 21.54 2.66 14.25 17.22 9.00 ——102.0 300 323.9 165.1 547.1 67.6 362.0 437.4 228.6 46.3 * On Centerline ‡ These dimensions apply only to a Series 705W Butterfly Valve with a 1/2-inch NPT, supply-side tap 1. To prevent rotation of valves. it is recommended that Series 705W be installed with Victaulic Style 07 Zero-Flex®, Style 005 FireLock, Style 009/009V FireLock EZ, or Style HP-70 Rigid Couplings. If Victaulic flexible couplings are used. additional support may be required. 2. Valve must not be installed with disc in full open position. Disc must be partly closed so that no part is protruding beyond end of valve body. 3. Victaulic grooved end butterfly valves are permitted for use with grooved end pipe (IPS) only. Not permitted for use with plain end (IPS) pipe. 4. Series 705W valves are designed for ambient weather conditions as opposed to submersible service. B J F A O E ½" NPTSupply Tap N P F J B P N ½" NPTSupply Tap A E O 2 1/2 – 4-INCH/65 – 100-MM SIZES 5 – 12-INCH/125 – 300-MM SIZES 10.18_3 FireLock® Butterfly Valve SERIES 705W WITH WEATHERPROOF ACTUATOR 10.18IPS CARBON STEEL PIPE – FIRE PROTECTION VALVES www.victaulic.com VICTAULIC IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF VICTAULIC COMPANY. © 2006 VICTAULIC COMPANY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. PRINTED IN THE USA. REV_G DIMENSIONS – Size Dimensions – inches/millimeters Aprx. Wgt. Each Nominal Size inches mm Actual Outside Diameter inches mm End to End “A” Hgt. “B”“E”“F”“J”“O”“N” ‡“P” ‡lbs/kg 2 1/2 2.875 3.77 8.76 —4.21 6.08 4.92 0.00 *0.75 8.3 65 73.0 95.6 222.5 106.9 154.4 125 0.0 *19.1 3.8 76.1 mm 3.000 3.77 8.76 —4.21 6.08 4.92 0.00 *0.75 8.3 76.1 95.6 222.5 106.9 154.4 125 0.0 *19.1 3.8 3 3.500 3.77 9.40 0.08 4.21 6.08 4.92 0.00 *0.75 8.9 80 88.9 95.6 238.8 2.0 106.9 154.4 125 0.0 *19.1 4.0 4 4.500 4.63 10.84 0.07 6.01 6.98 4.92 0.73 1.13 14.9 100 114.3 117.6 275.3 1.8 152.7 177.3 125 18.5 28.7 6.8 139.7 mm 5.500 5.88 12.38 0.43 6.01 8.57 7.87 ——21.0 139.7 149.4 314.5 10.9 152.7 217.7 200 9.5 5 5.563 5.88 12.38 0.43 6.01 8.57 7.87 ——21.0 125 141.3 149.4 314.5 10.9 152.7 217.7 200 9.5 165.1 mm 6.500 5.88 13.41 1.00 7.51 9.32 7.87 1.60 1.88 26.5 165.1 149.4 340.6 25.4 190.8 236.7 200 40.6 47.8 12.0 6 6.625 5.88 13.41 1.00 7.51 9.32 7.87 1.60 1.88 26.5 150 168.3 149.4 340.6 25.4 190.8 236.7 200 40.6 47.8 12.0 8 8.625 5.33 16.50 1.27 9.65 10.98 9.84 0.00 *0.68 43.0 200 219.1 135.4 419.1 32.3 245.1 278.9 250 0.0 *17.3 19.5 10 10.750 6.40 19.14 1.72 12.20 16.19 9.84 ——80.0 250 273.0 162.6 486.2 43.7 309.9 411.2 250 36.3 12 12.750 6.50 21.54 2.66 14.25 17.22 9.84 ——102.0 300 323.9 165.1 547.1 67.6 362.0 437.4 250 46.3 * On Centerline ‡ These dimensions apply only to a Series 705W Butterfly Valve with a 1/2-inch NPT, supply-side tap 1. To prevent rotation of valves. it is recommended that Series 705W be installed with Victaulic Style 07 Zero-Flex®. Style 005 FireLock, Style 009/009V FireLock EZ, or Style HP-70 Rigid Couplings. If Victaulic flexible couplings are used. additional support may be required. 2. Valve must not be installed with disc in full open position. Disc must be partly closed so that no part is protruding beyond end of valve body. 3. Victaulic grooved end butterfly valves are permitted for use with grooved end pipe (IPS) only. Not permitted for use with plain end (IPS) pipe. 4. Series 705W valves are designed for ambient weather conditions as opposed to submersible service. B J F A O E ½" NPTSupply Tap N P F J B P N ½" NPTSupply Tap A E O 2 1/2 – 4-INCH/65 – 100-MM SIZES 5 – 12-INCH/125 – 300-MM SIZES 10.18_4 FireLock® Butterfly Valve SERIES 705W WITH WEATHERPROOF ACTUATOR 10.18IPS CARBON STEEL PIPE – FIRE PROTECTION VALVES www.victaulic.com VICTAULIC IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF VICTAULIC COMPANY. © 2006 VICTAULIC COMPANY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. PRINTED IN THE USA.. REV_G 0026 PERFORMANCE The chart expresses the frictional resistance of Victaulic Series 705W in equivalent feet/meters of straight pipe. Size Size Nominal Size Inches mm Actual Outside Diameter Inches mm Equiv. Feet/m of Pipe Nominal Size Inches mm Actual Outside Diameter Inches mm Equiv. Feet/m of Pipe 2 1/2 2.875 5 165.1 mm 6.500 8 65 73.0 1.6 165.1 2.5 76.1 mm 3.000 5 6 6.625 8 76.1 1.6 150 168.3 2.5 3 3.500 5 8 8.625 11 80 88.9 1.6 200 219.1 3.4 4 4.500 12 10 10.750 12 100 114.3 3.7 250 273.0 3.7 139.7 mm 5.500 12 12 12.750 14 139.7 3.7 300 323.9 4.3 5 5.563 12 125 141.3 3.7 10.18_5 FireLock® Butterfly Valve SERIES 705W WITH WEATHERPROOF ACTUATOR 10.18IPS CARBON STEEL PIPE – FIRE PROTECTION VALVES www.victaulic.com VICTAULIC IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF VICTAULIC COMPANY. © 2006 VICTAULIC COMPANY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. PRINTED IN THE USA. REV_G MAXIMUM WORKINGS PRESSURE RATINGS Size Size Size Nominal Size Inches mm Actual Outside Diameter Inches mm cULus PSI FM PSI LPCB BAR Vos BAR 2 1/265 2.87573.0 300 300 20 16 76.1 mm 3.00076.1 300 300 20 16 380 3.50088.9 300 300 20 16 4100 4.500114.3 300 300 20 16 139.7 mm 5.500139.7 300 300 20 16 5 125 5.563 300 300 20 16141.3 165.1 6.500 165.1 300 300 20 16 6 150 6.625 168.3 300 300 20 16 8 200 8.625 219.1 300 300 20 16 10 250 10.750 273.0 300 300 20 16 12 300 12.750 323.9 300 300 20 16 Maximum Working Pressure by Agency PERFORMANCE CV values for flow of water at +60°F/+16°C with a fully open valve are shown in the table below. For additional details, contact Victaulic. Formulas for CV Values: ∆P = Q2 Cv 2 Where: Q = Flow (GPM) ∆P = Pressure Drop (psi) Cv = Flow CoefficientQ = Cv x ∆P Size CV Size CV Size CV Nominal Size Inches mm Actual Outside Diameter Inches mm (Full Open) Nominal Size Inches mm Actual Outside Diameter Inches mm (Full Open) Nominal Size Inches mm Actual Outside Diameter Inches mm (Full Open) 2 1/2 2.875 325 139.7 mm 5.500 1150 8 8.625 34006573.0 139.7 200 219.1 76.1 mm 3.000 325 5 5.563 1150 10 10.750 575076.1 125 141.3 250 273.0 3 3.500 482 165.1 mm 6.500 1850 12 12.750 83008088.9 165.1 300 323.9 4 4.500 600 6 6.625 1850100114.3 150 168.3 Formulas for KV Values: ∆P = Q2 Kv Where: Q = Flow ( ) ∆P = Pressure (bar) Kv = Flow FactorQ = Kv x ∆P m3 hr. Size KV Size KV Size KV Nominal Size Inches mm Actual Outside Diameter Inches mm (Full Open) Nominal Size Inches mm Actual Outside Diameter Inches mm (Full Open) Nominal Size Inches mm Actual Outside Diameter Inches mm (Full Open) 2 1/2 2.875 280 139.7 mm 5.500 995 8 8.625 29406573.0 139.7 200 219.1 76.1 mm 3.000 280 5 5.563 995 10 10.750 497576.1 125 141.3 250 273.0 3 3.500 415 165.1 mm 6.500 1600 12 12.750 71808088.9 165.1 300 323.9 4 4.500 520 6 6.625 1600100114.3 150 168.3 10.18_6 FireLock® Butterfly Valve SERIES 705W WITH WEATHERPROOF ACTUATOR 10.18IPS CARBON STEEL PIPE – FIRE PROTECTION VALVES www.victaulic.com VICTAULIC IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF VICTAULIC COMPANY. © 2006 VICTAULIC COMPANY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. PRINTED IN THE USA.. REV_G SWITCH AND WIRING 1. The supervisory switch contains two, single pole, double throw, pre-wired switches. 2. Switches are rated: 10 amps @ 125 or 250 VAC/60 Hz 0.50 amps @ 125 VDC 0.25 amps @ 250 VDC 3. Switches supervise the valve in the “open” position. 4. One switch has two #18 MTW wires per terminal, which permit complete supervision of leads (refer to diagrams and notes below). The second switch has one #18 MTW wire per terminal. This double circuit provides flexibility to operate two electrical devices at separate locations, such as an indicating light and an audible alarm, in the area that the valve is installed. 5. A #14 MTW ground lead (green) is provided. Switch #1 = S1 For connection to the supervisory circuit of a UL Listed alarm control panel Switch #2 = S2 Auxiliary switch that may be connected to auxiliary devices, per the authority having jurisdiction S1 {Normally Closed: (2) Blue Common: (2) Yellow S2 {Normally Closed: Blue with Orange Stripe Normally Open: Brown with Orange Stripe Common: Yellow with Orange Stripe CONDUIT ½" NPT CONDUIT CONNECTORS UL LISTEDJUNCTION BOX WIRE NUTS FIRE ALARM CONTROL PANEL SUPERVISORY CIRCUIT N.C.NO.COM. TO END-OF-LINE RESISTOR, OR NEXT INDICATOR BELL OR HORNVOLTAGE SOURCE Switch 1: 2 leads per terminal Switch 2: 1 lead per terminal SWITCH CONTACT RATING: 10A AT 125 AND 250VAC, 0.5A AT 125 VDC, 0.25 AT 250 VDC S1 S2 NOTE: The above diagram shows a connection between the common terminal (yellow – S1 and yellow-with-orange stripe – S2) and the normally closed terminal (blue – S1 and blue-with-orange stripe – S2). In this example, the indicator light and alarm will stay on until the valve is fully open. When the valve is fully open, the indicator light and alarm will go out. Cap off any unused wires (e.g. brown with orange stripe). Only S1 (two leads per terminal) may be connected to the fire alarm control panel. The connection of the alarm switch wiring shall be in accordance with NFPA 72 and the auxiliary switch per NFPA 70 (NEC). 10.18_7 FireLock® Butterfly Valve SERIES 705W WITH WEATHERPROOF ACTUATOR 10.18IPS CARBON STEEL PIPE – FIRE PROTECTION VALVES www.victaulic.com VICTAULIC IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF VICTAULIC COMPANY. © 2006 VICTAULIC COMPANY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. PRINTED IN THE USA. REV_G WARRANTY Refer to the Warranty section of the current Price List or contact Victaulic for details. This product shall be manufactured by Victaulic or to Victaulic specifications. All products to be installed in accordance with current Victaulic installation/assembly instructions. Victaulic reserves the right to change product specifications. designs and standard equipment without notice and without incurring obligations. NOTE Reference should always be made to the installation sheet included with the valve. Verify you have the latest revision by visiting our website at www.victaulic.com. Further reference can be found in the I-100 Victaulic Field Installation Handbook. INSTALLATION 10.18 FireLock® Butterfly Valve SERIES 705W WITH WEATHERPROOF ACTUATOR 10.18IPS CARBON STEEL PIPE – FIRE PROTECTION VALVES For complete contact information, visit www.victaulic.com 10.18 2466 REV G UPDATED 7/2007 VICTAULIC IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF VICTAULIC COMPANY. © 2006 VICTAULIC COMPANY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. PRINTED IN THE USA. WCAS-6ZAQT8 PAGE 1 OF 3PRINTED IN USA OSYSU-1, -2 OUTSIDE SCREW AND YOKE VALVE SUPERVISORY SWITCH MKT. #8820004 - REV R MFG# 5400979 - 2/08 UL, ULC, and CSFM Listed, FM Approved, NYMEA Accepted, CE Marked Dimensions: 6.19"L X 2.25"W X 5.88"H 1 5 , 7 c m L X 5 , 7 c m W X 1 4 , 6 c m H Weight: 2 lbs. (0,9 kg.) Enclosure: C o v e r - D i e - C a s t F i n i s h - R e d S p a t t e r E n a m e l B a s e - D i e C a s t Z i n c A l l p a r t s h a v e c o r r o s i o n r e s i s t a n t fi n i s h e s . Cover Tamper: Tamper resistant screws, O p t i o n a l c o v e r t a m p e r k i t a v a i l a b l e . Contact Ratings: O S Y S U - 1 : O n e s e t o f S P D T ( F o r m C ) O S Y S U - 2 : T w o s e t s o f S P D T ( F o r m C ) 1 5 . 0 0 A m p s a t 1 2 5 / 2 5 0 V A C 2 . 5 0 A m p s a t 3 0 V D C r e s i s t i v e Environmental Limitations: • NEMA 4 and NEMA 6P Enclosure (IP67) when used with appropriate watertight conduit fi ttings. • Indoor or Outdoor use (Not for use in hazardous locations. See bulletin no. 5400705 OSYS-U-EX for hazardous locations.) • Temperature Range: 40°F to 140°F (40°C to 60°C) Conduit Entrances: 2 k n o c k o u t s f o r 1 / 2 " c o n d u i t p r o v i d e d Service Use: A u t o m a t i c S p r i n k l e r N F P A - 1 3 O n e o r t w o f a m i l y d w e l l i n g N F P A - 1 3 D R e s i d e n t i a l o c c u p a n c y u p t o f o u r s t o r i e s N F P A - 1 3 R N a t i o n a l F i r e A l a r m C o d e N F P A - 7 2 General Information The OSYSU is used to monitor the open position of an OS&Y (outside screw and yoke) type gate valve. This device is available in two models; the OSYSU-1, containing one set of SPDT (Form C) contacts and the OSYSU-2, containing two sets of SPDT (Form C) contacts. These switches mount conveniently to most OS&Y valves ranging in size from 2" to 12" (50mm to 300mm). They will mount on some valves as small as ½" (12,5mm). The cover is held in place by two tamper resistant screws that require a special tool to remove. The tool is furnished with each device and should be left with the building owner or responsible party. Replacement or additional cover screws and hex keys are available. See Ordering Information. Optional Cover Tamper Switch A fi eld installable cover tamper switch is available as an option which may be used to indicate removal of the cover. See Ordering Information. Testing The OSYSU and its associated protective monitoring system should be inspected and tested in accordance with applicable NFPA codes and standards and/or the authority having jurisdiction (manufacturer recommends quarterly or more frequently). Potter Electric Signal Company, LLC • 2081 Craig Road, St. Louis, MO, 63146-4161 • Phone: 800-325-3936/Canada 888-882-1833 • www.pottersignal.com Ordering Information Model Description Stock No. OSYSU-1 Outside Screw & Yoke-Supervisory Switch 1010106 ( S i n g l e s w i t c h ) OSYSU-2 Outside Screw & Yoke-Supervisory Switch 1010206 ( D o u b l e s w i t c h ) -- Cover Screw 5490424 -- Hex Key for Cover Screws and Installation 5250062 A d j u s t m e n t s -- Optional Cover Tamper Switch Kit 0090131 For pressure reducer type valve installation kits (if required) contact valve manufacturer. PAGE 2 OF 3MKT. #8820004 - REV R MFG# 5400979 - 2/08 PRINTED IN USA OSYSU-1, -2 OUTSIDE SCREW AND YOKE VALVE SUPERVISORY SWITCH Large Valve Installation 1. With the valve in the FULL OPEN position, locate the OSYSU across the valve yoke as far as possible from the valve gland, so that the trip rod lays against the non-threaded portion of the valve stem. 2. Mount the OSYSU loosely with the carriage bolts and clamp bar supplied. 3. Loosen the locking screw that holds the trip rod in place and adjust the rod length (see Fig. 4). When adjusted properly, the rod should extend past the valve screw, but not so far that it contacts the clamp bar. Tighten the locking screw to hold the trip rod in place. Note: If trip rod length is excessive, loosen the locking screw and remove the trip rod from the trip lever. Using pliers, break off the one 1" (25mm) long notched section (see Fig. 5). Reinstall trip rod and repeat Step 3 procedure. 4. Mark the valve stem at the center of the trip rod. 5. Remove the OSYSU. File a 1/8" (3,2mm) deep groove centered on the mark of the valve stem utilizing a 3/8" (9,5mm) round, nontapered fi le. Round and smooth the edges of the groove to prevent damage to the valve packing and to allow the trip rod to move easily in and out of the groove as the valve is operated. 6. Mount the OSYSU loosely with the trip rod centered in groove. 7. Final adjustment is made by loosening 2 screws (see Fig. 2) and sliding the OSYSU on the bracket. Adjustment is correct when switches are not activated with the trip rod seated in the valve stem groove and that the switches activate within one turn when the valve is operated from the FULL OPEN towards the CLOSED position. 8. Tighten the adjustment screws and mounting hardware. Check to insure that the rod moves out of the groove easily and that the switches activate within one turn when the valve is operated from the FULL OPEN towards the CLOSED position. N o t e : close the valve fully to determine that the stem threads do not activate the switch. The switch being activated by the stem threads could result in a false valve open indication. Small Valve Installation 1. Remove and discard "C" washer and roller from the trip rod. 2. With the valve in the FULL OPEN position, locate the OSYSU across the valve yoke as far as possible from the valve gland, so that the trip rod lays against the non-threaded portion of the valve stem. 3. Loosen the locking screw that holds the trip rod in place and adjust the rod length (see Fig. 4). When adjusted properly, the rod should extend past the valve screw, but not so far that it contacts the clamp bar. Tighten the locking screw to hold the trip rod in place. Note: If trip rod length is excessive, loosen the locking screw and remove the trip rod from the trip lever. Using pliers, break off the 1" (25mm) long notched section (see Fig. 5). Reinstall trip rod and repeat Step 3 procedure. 4. Mount the OSYSU loosely with the carriage bolts and clamp bar supplied. On valves with limited clearance use J-hooks supplied instead of the carriage bolts and clamp bar to mount the OSYSU. 5. Mark the valve stem at the center of the trip rod. 6. Remove the OSYSU. File a 1/8" (3,2mm) deep groove centered on the mark on the valve stem utilizing a 3/16" (4,8mm) round, nontapered fi le. Round and smooth the edges of the groove to prevent damage to the valve packing and to allow the trip rod to move easily in and out of the groove as the valve is operated. 7. Mount the OSYSU with the trip rod centered in groove. 8. Final adjustment is made by loosening 2 screws (see Fig. 1) and sliding the OSYSU on the bracket. Adjustment is correct when switches are not activated with the trip rod seated in the valve stem groove and that the switches activate when the trip rod moves out of the groove. 9. Tighten the adjustment screws and all mounting hardware. Check to insure that the rod moves out of the groove easily and that the switches activate within one turn when the valve is operated from the FULL OPEN towards the CLOSED position. Note: Close the valve fully to determine that the stem threads do not activate the switch. The switch being activated by the stem threads could result in a false valve open indication. Fig. 2 Large Valve Installation 3" thru 12" (76mm thru 300mm) Sizes Fig. 1 Small Valve Installation ½" thru 2½" (12,5mm thru 63,5mm) Sizes These switches mount conveniently to most 2" to 12" OS&Y valves. They will mount on some valves as small as ½" (12,5mm). J-hooks may be required on valves with limited clearance. PAGE 3 OF 3PRINTED IN USA OSYSU-1, -2 OUTSIDE SCREW AND YOKE VALVE SUPERVISORY SWITCH MKT. #8820004 - REV R MFG# 5400979 - 2/08 Contacts shown in normal (valve open) condition. Switch Terminal Connections Clamping Plate Terminal Fig. 3 Dimensions Fig. 4 Parts Fig. 5 Breaking Excessive Rod Length An uninsulated section of a single conductor should not be looped around the terminal and serve as two separate connections. The wire must be severed, thereby providing supervision of the connection in the event that the wire becomes dislodged from under the terminal. Typical Electrical Connections Typical Switch Action 10 APPENDIX B 614 N. 2nd Street, Ste A Rogers, AR 72756 Tel: 620-423-3010 Fax: 479-636-1656 ISO 9001:2008 certified QMS. Certificate Number: 45729 ISO 9001:2008 03/02/2014 TC Quote #: QL19769-1 Roger Neal High Country Engineering Tel.: 970-945-8676 E-mail: rneal@hceng.com Reference: Glenwood Springs, CO Dear Roger: At the Tank Connection, we have a unique perspective on potable water, wastewater, fire protection and industrial liquid applications. We are the only tank supplier worldwide that designs, manufactures and installs all four types of steel storage tanks in cluding bolted RTP, field-weld, shop-weld and hybrid tank designs. We know the merits of each type of construction, which allows us to objectively propose the right type of storage for your application. In bolted tank fabrication, TC commands the top product line worldwide. We offer: Our precision RTP (rolled, tapered panel) construction is the #1 bolted tank design selected worldwide. TC’s proprietary LIQ Fusion 7000 FBE™ powder coat system is the #1 performance interior tank lining available for water and wastewater storage applications worldwide. TC’s proprietary EXT Fusion 5000 FBE & SDP (powder on powder) system provides unmatched performance compared to ALL exterior bolted tank coatings. TC’s Quality Management System is ISO 9001:2008 certified. TC’s synchronized hydraulic jacking process is reviewed as the top field construction process based on field safety and installed quality. The TC support team profiles with over 2100 years of combined sto rage tank experience. In bolted tank fabrication, the Tank Connection Affiliate Group is unrivaled worldwide. Get all the facts on liquid storage at one of our websites. Download our “quick specs” at www.liquidtanks.com for ground reservoirs, elevated water tanks and all types of steel tank construction. TC Quote #: QL19769-1 www.tankconnection.com Page 2 of 7 We are pleased to offer the following proposal for your review: GEOMETRY / DESCRIPTION Tank Quantity: 1 Construction Method: TC Rolled Tapered Panel (RTP) Bolted Design – For more information please review the following TCAG brochures “Liquid Containment Solutions” & “RTP Design vs. API-12B” Materials of Construction: Carbon steel Nominal Inside Diameter: 38.62 feet Nominal Eave Height: 24.55 feet Note: Nominal eave height is measured as follows: Steel Floor Applications – bottom of base angle to top of eave angle Concrete Floor Applications – top of finished concrete floor to top of eave angle Bottom Style: Flat Steel Floor - Floor materials supplied by Tank Connection. Tank Supported By: Reinforced concrete foundation designed by TC & supplied / installed by others meeting the requirements of AWWA D103-09 Roof Style: Steel cone with 2” rise to 12” run (9.46o) slope Roof Support Style: Self-supported with internal rafters Usable Capacity: 202,019 US gallons based on 12” of freeboard plus 6” at tank bottom DESIGN CRITERIA Design Specifications: NFPA-22 Seismic Design: Per AWWA D103-09: SS=43.2%g, S1=13.4%g, Site Class=D, Use Group=3, I=1.50 Wind Design: Per AWWA D103-09: 90mph, Exp. C, I=1.15 Deck Live / Snow Load: 40 pounds per square foot Product Stored: Fire protection water Specific Gravity: 1.0 Product pH Range: 4 to 9 assumed Design Pressure / Vacuum: +2.0 / -0.5 ounces per square inch Operating Pressure / Vacuum: Atmospheric Design Temperature: Ambient Operating Temperature: Ambient Corrosion Allowance: Not applicable Tank Empty Weight: 47,011 pounds Jobsite Location: Glenwood Springs, CO SEALANTS / GASKETS / HARDWARE Roof Gasket: White EPDM strip gasket – 3/32” thick Sidewall Sealant: High performance moisture-cured elastomeric sealant – White Bottom Sealant: High performance moisture-cured elastomeric sealant – White Hardware: Plastic encapsulated JS1000 coated grade 8 minimum bolts with JS1000 coated flat washers & hex nuts. Tank bottom hardware includes plastic encapsulated nuts. TC Quote #: QL19769-1 www.tankconnection.com Page 3 of 7 COATINGS Interior Coating: LIQ Fusion 7000 FBE TM 6 mils nominal DFT Range 5 - 9 mils average DFT Exterior Primer: EXT Fusion 5000 FBE TM 3 mils nominal DFT Range 3 - 5 mils average DFT Exterior Finish Coat: EXT Fusion SDP TM 3 mils nominal DFT Range 3 - 5 mils average DFT Exterior Color: Customer to specify from TC standard colors (white, tan, light gray, light green & light blue). See note #9 below for more information regarding premium and custom colors. Notes: 1. All coatings are baked-on formulation, applied over an SP10 surface preparation 2. Touch-up coating kits for interior and exterior are provided for field application as required. 3. LIQ Fusion 7000 FBE - A proprietary system unmatched in performance compared to ALL bolted tank linings 4. EXT Fusion 5000 FBE & SDP – A proprietary exterior system that profiles as “powder fused on powder” system 5. DFT = dry film thickness 6. FBE = fusion bonded epoxy powder coating 7. SDP = super durable polyester powder coating 8. TC performs in-house holiday testing to ensure interior coating in liquid zone is 100% holiday free. 9. Premium colors (forest green & cobalt blue) and specially formulated colors are available for an additional fee. 10. Coating is NSF 61 approved For more information please review the following TCAG brochures “Unmatched Liquid Coating Performance!” & “LIQ-Fusion 7000 FBETM…A Stronger System than Glass” Note: All nozzles 5” diameter and less - coated exterior / pipe is stainless steel TANK COMPONENTS / ACCESSORIES Mark: Qty: Description: -------- 1 Tank Connection logo (installed on top ring) -------- 1 Liquid tank nameplate -------- --- Anchor bolts are not required per design -------- 1 20” Diameter manway / free-air ventilator with aluminum insect screen mounted on 20” diameter collar located in the center of the tank roof -------- 1 24” Square manway with lockable hinged cover located in tank roof -------- 1 24” Diameter shell manway with bolt-on hinged cover -------- 1 24” x 46” Flush cleanout with bolt-on cover plate -------- 1 10” Diameter 150# RFSO single flanged exterior nozzle w/ internal 90 degree elbow & vortex breaker for suction (elbow & anti-vortex are coated exterior / uncoated on interior) -------- 1 2” Diameter 150# RFSO single flanged nozzle located in tank sidewall for drain -------- 1 4” Diameter 150# RFSO single flanged nozzle located in tank sidewall for inlet -------- 1 10” Diameter 150# RFSO single flanged nozzle located in tank sidewall for return -------- 1 6” Diameter internal 90 degree weir elbow w/ external 6” diameter standard weight downcomer pipe, pipe support brackets & flap valve for overflow – Includes stainless steel insect screen (coated exterior, interior pipe is uncoated -------- 1 6” Diameter 150# RFSO single flanged nozzle located in tank sidewall for heater -------- 1 Internal heater support stand -------- 1 Liquid level indicator with gauge board and high visibility target – Full travel (mechanical, float type) -------- 1 Partial deck perimeter guardrail assembly – 10’ either side of ladder – OSHA – HDG -------- 1 Outside caged ladder with lockable hoop and intermediate rest platform(s) (if required) – OSHA – HDG – Includes safety chain at tank deck location & all platform(s). -------- 1 Inside wall ladder – NON-OSHA – Coated with LIQ Fusion 7000 FBE -------- 1 Saf-T-Climb system for interior ladder – HDG – Includes (1) Saf-T-Belt & (1) Saf-T-Harness -------- --- ½” thick asphalt impregnated fiberboard located under steel bottom of tank -------- --- 4 mil polyethylene sheeting located between tank foundation & fiberboard -------- --- Final drawings and engineering calculations to include a OR P.E. stamp TC Quote #: QL19769-1 www.tankconnection.com Page 4 of 7 INSTALLATION SERVICES Mark: Qty: Description: -------- Incl Hydrostatic Leak Test -------- Incl Insulation IMMERSION HEATER Indeeco Model #781-140871 15 kW 15’ long probe 480 volt 3 phase Mounting kit Pricing includes material, freight & mechanical installation only. Electrical / control wiring by others. TANK INSULATION Materials, freight & non-union, non-prevailing wages installation to insulate tank(s) as described above. Includes the following: Vertical standing seam panel insulation system Sidewalls to be stucco embossed 0.025 aluminum. Panels will be laminated to 2” polyisocyanurate with a non- flammable adhesive Roof to be 0.025 stucco embossed aluminum. Panels will be laminated to a 2” polyisocyanurate with a non- flammable adhesive. Quote based on color to be selected from standard colors: Fawn, White or Clear Strapping to be 0.015 stainless steel. Panels to be attached by ¼” stainless steel cables. FOUNDATION DESIGN Qty: Description: 1 FOUNDATION DESIGN DISCLAIMER: Ringwall, turned down slab, structural mat, or base setting ring foundation design drawings and engineering calculations to include an OR P.E. stamp based on geotechnical report supplied by others. NOTE: Additional charges will apply if piers, pilings, etc. are required due to unsuitable soil conditions. PRICING SUMMARY $76,878.00 TANK MATERIALS & ACCESSORIES (includes all applicable discounts) $34,412.00 TANK INSTALLATION (utilizing non-union, non-prevailing wage labor rates) $5,854.00 ESTIMATED FREIGHT (FCA destination, 1 truckload(s), pricing excludes unloading at jobsite) $4,940.00 IMMERSION HEATER $54,056.00 TANK INSULATION (includes material, freight & installation) $2,500.00 FOUNDATION DESIGN (see foundation disclaimer above) TC Quote #: QL19769-1 www.tankconnection.com Page 5 of 7 PRICING VALIDITY AND STEEL COSTS: Due to current volatility in the carbon steel market, material escalation (if any) will be based on AMM (American Metals Market) published price index for hot rolled carbon steel. Pricing included in this proposal is based on today’s published index. Any increase in steel costs between date of proposal and material procurement above this benchmark will be to customer’s account. (Example: If steel increases $.03/per pound, this would increase the cost of a 30,000 lb. tank as follows: 30,000 lbs. x 3¢ = $900). Note: Steel is typically procured anywhere from 2 weeks after returned approval drawings to approx. 6 weeks prior to shipment). EXCEPTIONS & CLARIFICATIONS: GENERAL All exceptions & clarifications listed below apply unless specifically noted otherwise within the scope of supply. Please refer to attached document TC-2 005 – Terms & Conditions of Sale for additional clarifications Any items or specifications not specifically mentioned in this quotation are not a part of this quotation. This quotation represents our complete offering. All quoted materials conform to the Buy American Act with the exception of the JS 1000 coated hardware. This specialized hardware is not manufactured in the US; therefore, TC sources it from a manufacturer located in Canada. Federal Register, Volume 74, #104 – Notices, dated 6/2/09 allows an exception to the Buy American Act when non-domestic materials make up less than 5% of the total material costs incorporated into a project. For more information please visit the EPA website or click on the following link http://www.epa.gov/water/eparecovery/docs/BA_De_Minimus_Waiver.pdf Bid bonds, performance & payment bonds, permits, sales and/or use taxes are not included. Foundation loading calculations are supplied by TC; however, foundation excavation, foundation materials, and foundation installation are the responsibility of others. Piping, valves, mixers, lighting, electrical wiring, control wiring, control systems, and other auxiliary equipment are supplied and installed by others. Insulation clips / brackets, insulation materials, insulation installation, and tank heaters are the responsibility of others, unless otherwise noted above. Disinfection of tank interior is the responsibility of others. Engineering calculations are available with submittal drawings for an additional charge. Three sets of drawings are provided for each size tank. Specific Professional Engineer’s Seal on final drawings will be furnished. Customer is responsible for proper tank ventilation. Tank Connection standard 20” diameter mushroom vent with insect screen is not considered a frost-free vent. If a frost-free vent is required for the application, an emergency pressure/vacuum relief valve must be added. Please refer to attached document TC-3 009 – Preventing Galvanic Corrosion for clarification on the use/need of cathodic protection systems with TC factory applied coatings. TC standard pipe brackets support only lateral loads and are intended to be used as guides only. Pipe supports stands / brackets must be supplied by others. TC’s standard bolted tanks comply with API 650 welding requirements as applicable to bolted tank fabrication. Indemnification – TC will be responsible for their negligence only. MATERIALS Anchor bolts, nuts, and saddles are supplied by TC only if required by final tank design. Unless otherwise noted, TC has quoted our standard design, fabrication, accessories (perimeter handrails, ladders, etc.) and coatings to aid in cost efficiency. INSTALLATION Installation price quoted includes a water leak test. Customer to provide sufficient water to fill the tan k within 24 hours. Sufficient water supply, piping, blind flanges, and other equipment necessary to hydrostat (leak) test must be supplied and installed by customer prior to erector leaving the jobsite or additional costs will be incurred. Disposal of te st water (if necessary) is the responsibility of the customer. Installation price quoted is based on summer weather conditions (April through October). Increased costs may apply during winter weather conditions (November through March). Field installation of cast-in-place or epoxy style anchor bolts is the responsibility of others. Installation pricing is based on free and clear access all around the foundation with no overhead obstruc tions. TC Quote #: QL19769-1 www.tankconnection.com Page 6 of 7 Adequate area for material staging adjacent to foundation is required. Typical 100’ minimum lay-down area is required, with 360 degree clear access provided. See TC document TC-2 001 Field Clarifications. We have based our installation bid on open work hours, utilizing all daylight hours, 7 days/week. Continuous operation of installation is required, eliminating the need for lost time. Sanitary facilities and trash dumpster to be provided by customer. Buyer must obtain insurance against loss by fire, lightning, removal, and all extended coverage perils, theft, vandalism, and malicious mischief, earthquake, negligence, and any other insurance which Buyer deems necessary (generally covered in Buyer’s Risk policies). Buyer need not cover tools owned by workers or tools and equipment owned or rented by installer. Buyer is required to provide protection to prevent theft of material from jobsite. FREIGHT Customer is responsible for material off-loading of trucks as they arrive at the jobsite. TC suggests the use of an all-terrain reach forklift for assistance as all pallets & crates weigh 6,000# or less. Materials to be staged adjacent to jobsite. Freight prices quoted are FCA destination and do not include any permits, duty, sales and/or use taxes. TERMS OF PAYMENT: 30% of material due upon order placement – due on receipt 30% of material due upon customer notification to proceed with manufacturing – due on receipt 40% of material due upon shipment (or upon manufacture of tank(s), if shipment is delayed by customer) – Net 15 Installation is billed progressively every 14 days based on percentage of completion – due on receipt Freight is Prepaid & Add – due on receipt No retainage is applicable unless previously agreed upon. All terms of payment are subject to approval by our credit department. Past due invoices will be charged a service charge of 1.5% per month. We reserve the right to delay tank erection if payment on tank invoice is not paid in accordance with stated terms. In the event that water is not available at the time of tank erection completion, return trip charges may be applicable. SCHEDULE: o Approval drawings: 2 to 3 weeks after order placement o Final drawings: 2 to 3 weeks prior to shipment of tank o Tank Delivery: 10 to 12 weeks after receipt of all approved drawings and details. o If this schedule is not satisfactory, every effort will be made to meet your requirements Tank Connection appreciates the opportunity to provide this proposal for your application. We are committed to providing the highest quality products and services available. It is our goal to provide your company with excellent customer service at every stage of project review. If you have any questions concerning the scope of this quotation, we are available to meet with you in your office, over th e phone, or via email exchange. Please advise us at you earliest convenience on our proposal and how we can assist you with your other requirements. Best Regards, Chasnie Vinson Liquid Division Tank Connection Ph: 620-423-3010 x 234 Email: Chasnie@tankconnection.com Web: www.tankconnection.com TC Quote #: QL19769-1 www.tankconnection.com Page 7 of 7 TO PLACE AN ORDER: SIMPLY FILL OUT THE INFORMATION BELOW, SIGN & RETURN The undersigned is authorized to purchase products on behalf of the company they represent. __________________________________________ _____________________________________________ PRINTED NAME: SIGNATURE __________________________________________ _____________________________________________ TITLE: DATE: __________________________________________ _____________________________________________ PURCHASE ORDER #: REQUESTED DELIVERY DATE: 11 APPENDIX C February 11, 2015 High Country Engineering Attn Roger Neal 1517 Blake Ave Ste 101 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Re: Will serve letter for Residential & commercial property off County Rd 154, Macgregor property Dear Mr. Neal , In accordance with our tariffs filed with and approved by the Colorado Public Utilities Commission, Electric facilities can be made available to serve your project at the property/properties off County Rd 154 . Service will be provided after engineering is completed, payment is received, any easements are signed and construction can be completed. We will have better information available after design has been completed as to a scheduled in- service date. If I can be of further assistance, please contact me at 970-244-2622 . Sincerely, Sam Wakefield Planner, Rifle 02/11/2015 Attn: Roger Neal High Country Engineering, Inc. 1517 Blake Ave, Suite 100 Glenwood Springs, CO. 81601 Re: FedEx Facility (County Rd 154) Qwest Corporation d/b/a CenturyLink QC will provide telephone facilities to FedEx Facility (County Rd 154) as defined by the current PUC Tariffs. Jason Sharpe Engineer II (Field Operations) 970-328-8290 12 APPENDIX D ONSITE WATER TREATMENT SYSTEM PLAN FOR EASTBANK MAJOR DEVELOPMENT The Eastbank Major Development Consists of a Fedex Transport Facility and is located off CR 154, Garfield County, State of Colorado. This lot will be served by an Onsite Water Treatment System (OWTS) since the lot size is consistent with the Garfield County Zoning Regulations and a municipal system is not available for hookup. OWTS design, installation, and maintenance will be the responsibility of the individual lot owner. Percolation tests, and soil profile evaluations have been completed in accordance with local regulations prior to the system design. The installation will be inspected and certified by a professional engineer registered in the State of Colorado and/or his representative with a 48 hour notice of inspection. Lot 2 of the Eastbank Minor Subdivision is located within Garfield County. Any OWTS questions or concerns should be directed to Garfield County Building Department Department representatives and Garfield County code should be referenced. Garfield County contact information is: Garfield County Building Department Attn: Andy Swaller Building Official Garfield County Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 (970) 945-8212 DESIGN SPECIFICAITONS The OWTS system for Lot 1 was designed for 25 at location employees and 30 contract delivery personnel. The average daily flow of 650 gallons was utilized to calculate the OWTS sizing. See OWTS system design sheets submitted for permit for tank and field sizing and locations. INTRODUCTION An Onsite Water Treatment System (OWTS), also referred to as a "septic system", receives waste water and solids from a building's plumbing facilities (bathrooms, break area, water fountains), treats, and then disposes of the effluent from this waste, by permitting it to absorb into the natural soils within the lot. "Treatment" is accomplished by bacterial action in the "septic" or "treatment" tank, and by bacteria within the soil surrounding the effluent absorption system, the "drain-field." This bacterial action is needed to reduce the level of pathogens in the effluent discharges from the waste system into the soil. The principal components of this on-site waste disposal system include the following: Piping Septic Tank Dosing Pump Absorption Field However, many variations on this general scheme are used and special equipment and numerous systems can be designed and utilized for problematic or difficult sites. According to the geotechnical report, the USDA soil texture is a silt load to a silty clay loam with some compression upon wetting. Percolation tests determined percolation rates between 30 and 60 minutes per inch. High percolation test results equal more time for effluent to flow through the soil. The higher the percolation test results, the more area will be required for the OWTS field design. LTAR (Long Term Acceptance Rate) for this OWTS septic field design was determined using both the percolation test results and the gradations and soil type. The LTAR based on the parameters set forth by the State of Colorado, and the information from the geotechnical engineer indicate a LTAR of ).35 to be used in this OWTS design. WASTE SYSTEM USE This septic system is designed to handle human waste, toilet paper and water from plumbing fixtures such as toilets, baths, and sinks. Household cleaners, detergents and bleach will not damage your system if used in moderation. However, biodegradable and environmentally friendly soaps, detergents and other products are recommended. If your septic field is inundated with harsh chemicals or overloaded with detergents and soaps, septic system function may be impaired or field failure may occur. Draining large water sources with harsh chemicals associated with them into the system will cause premature failure of the system. Never pour oil, cooking grease, paint, or insecticides into the waste system. These items can inhibit the bacteria which are so critical to the proper functioning of your system. Non-degradable paper products, such as diapers, sanitary napkins or tampons, and paper towels are harmful to your system. Also refrain from introducing any other non-biodegradable substances such as condoms, plastic baggies, plastic film-wrap, or cigarette butts. These items can cause serious clogging problems. A garbage disposal can be used within the plumbing of the building; however, the tank will require pumping more frequently if large particles are present within the effluent. The more garbage disposals within building that are utilized, the more often you will want to pump your tank. Once the primary chamber of a tank has filled with solid wastes, the solid wastes have nowhere to go other than the secondary liquid chamber. Your system is also designed to handle a certain volume of water. If you consistently overload your septic system, you will cause premature failure. A frequent source of overload is leaking plumbing fixtures and water treatment systems such as an RO system. The brine from an RO system can be as much as a 2:1 ratio of brine to usable water. This amount of added liquids was not calculated into the field design. These two small items can amount to hundreds of extra gallons of water going into your septic system each month. Leaks should be repaired immediately. Other recommendations for reducing wastewater flow are; installing water-saving devices in such as sinks and toilets and lowering the amount of water hitting the system from any other sources by spreading the use out over longer periods rather than doing it all within a short time period. SEPTIC TANK The bacteria that thrive in a septic tank are critical to the proper function of the system. These bacteria are required in the septic system to degrade and decompose the solids. When too much solid material accumulates in the tank over a period of years, it begins to wash out of the tank and into the drain-field with the normal liquid effluent. The solids clog the drain-field and absorption rates into the natural soils are reduced. As more solids flow from the tank, the drain-field will eventually not be able to absorb the liquid effluent, and the drain-field will fail. This is the most common cause of drain-field failure. Your drain field should have monitoring wells located at the far end of the field. These wells can help detect or prevent a field failure prior to its occurrence. A professional septic tank/field maintenance company should be scheduled for regular maintenance and well monitoring. It is suggested that you have your septic tank pumped every 2-3 years on a regular maintenance schedule. If the owners of the building utilize garbage disposals frequently, you may need to pump the septic tank every 1-2 years. Extensions of all septic tank components should be installed to allow for access to them from existing grade. DRAINFIELD AREA The drain-field is ideally located in a sunny open area for maximum evaporation. Trees and shrubs should not be planted near the drain-field as root intrusion may impair the drain-field. Any plants that do not have deep roots can be planted over a drain-field and are actually recommended. The surface of the drain field should be seeded upon completion. Grasses and ground cover provide the highest level of evapo-transpiration (the cycle of plants taking moisture from the soil by their root systems and transferring to the atmosphere using the sun's energy) without the complication of root systems clogging drainpipes and trench beds. Geofabrics or plastics should not be used over the drain field. Mulched areas or flower beds hold moisture and decrease drain-field efficiency. Walkways, patios, parking areas, decks or other permanent structures should not be constructed over either the septic tank or the drain-field. If you purchase a load rated septic tank, this can be placed within a hardscape vehicle traffic area. Vehicle traffic should be kept off of the drain-field and heavy trucks/equipment should be kept a minimum of 10 horizontal feet away from the drain-field area. Heavy vehicles can cause the drain-fields to collapse. Excavation equipment must not drive in drain field excavations due to the potential to compact the field area soils. Hand raking of trenches and bed areas is recommended prior to placing infiltrator units or gravel/piping to open up the material voids. Rainwater or other drainage water should be diverted around the drain-field area. The drain-field is designed to meet the capacity of waste water coming from the building. Additional water from poor drainage may cause premature field failure. Livestock or horses should not be allowed on the OWTS due to compaction and component damage concerns. Other waters not associated with standard waste waters should not be drained over the fields nor into the field system. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF OWTS A. Responsibility: The property owner shall be responsible for hiring a reputable service company to maintain the OWTS system and for maintaining those service contracts for the septic tank, absorption field inspections and any other components needing maintenance for the life of the system. This company will be required to inspect and maintain (including pumping of the septic tank, if necessary) the systems each year. B. Maintenance and Cleaning: The selected service company shall be required to inspect the system for acceptable operation, pump the septic tanks (if required), and verify the local and state regulations are being met with the inspected systems. Routine maintenance and pumping of the septic tanks will be paid for by the property owner. Other required repairs to OWTS systems will be the responsibility of the property owner also. The owner of an OWTS shall notify the local health department on any proposed system modifications prior to making the changes, and shall have the system approved once the modifications are complete. C. Disposal of Waste Materials: Disposal of waste materials removed from a system in the process of maintenance or cleaning shall be accomplished at a site approved by local county officials in a manner which does not create a hazard to the public health, a nuisance or an undue risk of pollution and which complies with state and local rules and regulations. D. No Discharge is Permitted Which Does not Comply With Rules and Regulations: No sewage or effluent shall be permitted to be discharged into or upon the surface of the ground or into state waters unless the sewage system and effluent meets the minimum requirements of applicable rules and regulations. E. Termination of Use of System: The contents of a septic tank, vault, or seepage pit, the use of which has been terminated, shall be properly disposed of whereupon the emptied tank, vault, or pit shall be filled with soil or rock, or the health officer may require the tank or vault to be removed and disposed of properly. SUMMARY OWTS systems are a good alternative to users who do not have access to a community sewage disposal system. With the proper monitoring and maintenance of the system, many years of trouble free functioning can be had out of your OWTS system. Roger Neal, PE Principal High Country Engineering, Inc. Form No. GWS-25 APPLICANT OF FIC E OF THE STATE ENGINEER CO L ORADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 818 Centennial Bldg ., 1313 Sherman St , Denver , Colo rado 80203 (303) 866-3581 WE L L PERMIT NUMBER ----=--79=...;0::....:7--=0 ___ -~F __ DIV. 5 WD 38 DES. BASIN MD EXST Lot: 1 Block: Filing : Subdiv: EASTBANK LLC M INOR PARCEL 2A EASTBANK PARCL 2 KW GLENWOOD SPRINGS LLC 2525 EAST BROADWAY, SUITE 201 TUCSON , AZ 85716- A PPROVE D WELL LOCAT ION GARFIELD COUNTY NW 1 /4 SE 1 /4 Section 35 Township 6 S Range 89 W Sixth P.M . DISTANCES FROM SECTION LINES 2430 Ft. from South 2565 Ft. from East Section Line Section Line UTM COORDINATES (Meters,Zone :13 ,NAD83) CHA NG E/EX PAN S IO N OF USE OF AN EXISTING WEL L Easting: Northing: ISSUANC E OF THIS PER MIT DOES NOT CONFER A WATER RIGHT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1) T his well shall be used in such a way as to cause no material injury to exist in g water rights . T he issuance of th is perm it does not ensure that no injury will occur to another vested water right or preclude another owner of a vested water r ight from seeking re lief in a civil court action. 2) The construction of this well shall be in compliance w ith the Water Well Construction Rules 2 CCR 402-2 , unless approval of a variance has been granted by the State Board of Examiners of Water Well Construction and Pump Installation Contractors in accordance with Rule 18. 3) Approved pursuant to CRS 37 -90-137(2) on the condition that this well is operated as an a lternate point of diversion to the Basalt Conduit (if applicable per decree) and in accordance with one or more of the augmentation plans approved by the Div. 5 Water Court for the Basalt Water Conservancy District in Case Nos. 87CW0155, 93CW0319, 98CW0026/98CW0089, 01CW0305, & 02CW0077 (a nd Case No. 10CW0047 if in Area A-3 as described in decree). or operating pursuant to an approved substitute water supply plan . If this well is not operated in accordance with the terms of said decree(s) or SWSP, it will be subject to administration in c luding orders to cease diverting water. BWCD contract #653 . 4) Approved for the installation of a pump in, and the use of, a n existing well . constructed on March 2 , 2015, to a depth of 1 15 feet, under permit no . 296873 (canceled}. Issuance of this permit hereby cancels permit no. 296873 . 5) The use of g round water from this well is limited to fire protection, drinking and sanitary facil ities for a commercial business and the irrigation of not more than 15,450 square feet of lawn/landscape . Water from this well sha ll not be used for any other purpose outside the business building structure(s). This well is know as KW Well. 6 ) The pumping rate of this well shall not exceed 15 GPM. 7) The annual w ithdrawal of ground water from this well shal l not exceed 1.18 acre-foot. 8) The return flow from the use of th is well must be through either a central treatment system , a septic tank and leach field system , o r an evaporative system , wh ichever does not exceed the amount specified in the Basalt contract. 9) The owner shall mark the well in a conspicuous place w ith well permit number(s), name of the aqu ifer, and court case number(s) as appropriate. The owner shall t ake necessary means and precautions to preserve these markings. 10) This well shall be located not more than 200 feet from the location specified on this permit and at least 600 feet from any existing well , completed in the same aquifer, that is not owned by the applicant. 11) A total izing flow meter must be installed on this well and maintained in good working order. Permanent records of a ll d iversions must be maintained by the well owner (recorded at least annually) and submitted to the Division Engineer upon request. NOTE: This well is to be located on a tract of land of 3.848 acre(s) described as lot 1, Eastbank LLC Minor Subdivision, A Subdivision of Parcel 2A Of Eastbank Parcel 2 Lot Split, Garfield County. NOTE: Section 35 is an irregula r "Tall and Narrow" section . NOTE: Parcel Identification Number (PIN): 23-2185-353-04-001 NOTE: APPROVED DMW Assessor Tax Schedule Number: R083020 (total in g 38.2 acre s) Receipt No. 9503931 DATE ISSUED 06-04-2015 By EXP IRAT ION DATE 06 -04-2016