HomeMy WebLinkAbout3.0 BOCC Staff Report 04.01.2002"ul'1 o o
BOCC CI410u02
KKS
PROJECT INFORMA'TION AND STAFF COMMENTS
REOUEST:A request for review 6f a plgliminary Plan for a six
(6) unit aparhent complex.
APPIICANT:Cinderbetts LLC
ENGIMER:High Country Engineering
LOCATION:24lMelRay Road
WATER:City of Glenwood Springs
SEWER:West Glenwood Sanitation District
ACCESS:Mel Ray Road
CommerciaV Limited (C/L)
ADJACENT ZONING:CommerciaV Limited (ClL)
RELATIONSHIP TO T}IE COMPREHENSWE PI-AN
The subject property is located in the City of Glenwood Springs Urban Area of Influence
as shown on the Garfield County Comprehensive Plan Management Districts Map.
Within this designation, the property is located in an existing subdivision. There is no
suggested density.
PROJECT INFORMATION
Site Descriplion: The property is located in West Glenwood on a lot on the west side of
Mel Ray Road. The adjacent properties are residentially developed and the property to
the west is an undeveloped field. The properly presently has a manufactured home on it
and is developed as a residential lot.
B,Development Propos4: The applicant is proposing to build a six (6) unit apartuent
complex on the site with four (4) 2-bedroom units and two (2) l-bedroom units. The
aparhnents will have water supplied by the City of Glenwood Springs and sewer supplied
by the West Glenwood Sanitation District. The builrling has a footprint of approximately
1,575 sqlure feet, with ten (10) proposed off-street parking spaces. Access to the
1
L
tr.
A.
I o o
development site is directly offof Mel Ray Road.
REVIEW AGENCY COMMENTS :
Referrals of the site plan were sent to the following:
Mt. Sopris Conservation District: No comments received
Citv of Glenwood Sprines: Jill Peterson, Planner, and Robin Millyard, Public Works
Director, responded to this application. Both individuals pointed out that this application
is subject to water improvement fees due to the increase in tap size. The applicant will
also be required to enter into a Pre-Annexation agreement with the City. Please see
ExhibitA and B.
RE-1 School Distict:No comments received.
West Glenwood Sanitation District: No comments received.
Garfield Countv Road & Bridee: No comments received
Glenwood Springs Fire Protection District: Bill Harding, Battalion Chief, responded to
the application stating that the proposed project is in compliance for firefighting in terms
of water supply. Additionally, the fire hydrants are conveniently located for frefighting
operations, and both of the hydrants conform to the distance requirements of the Uniform
Fire Code. See Exhibit C.
Garfield County Housing Authority: No comments received.
Garfreld County Sheriff: No comments received.
CQlorado Geological Survey: Jonathon White, Engineering Geologist, stated that the CGS
has no concems with the development as intended as long as the developer adheres to the
development plans as submitted. See Exhibit D.
STAFF COMMENTS
Comprehensive Blan: The Garfield County Comprehensive Plan of 2000 identifies this
property as an existing subdivision. As there is no suggested density, this application is
not in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan.
Zontng: The property is zoned CommerciaU Limited (C/L), which allows for the use of
multi-family dwellings. The following regulations apply to this project, which the
applicant has complied with.
3.07.04 Minimltrq Lo! Area: Seven thousand five hundred (7,500) square feet and as furtherprovided under Supplementary Regulations.
3.07.05 l4atjltum L.ot C.overage: Seventy-five percent (75%o), except for commercial uses which
shall be eighty-five percent (85%o).
3.07.06 Minimum Setback:
(1) Frontyard: (a) arterial streets: seventy-five (75)feetfromstreetcenterline orfifty (50)
feetfromfront lot line, whichever is greater; (b) local streets; fifty (50) feetfrom centerline
or twenty-fwe (25) feetfromfront lot line, whichever is greater;
(2) Rearyard:Twenty-five(25)feetfromrearlotlineforlotoccupiedbyresidentialuses;
seven and one-half (7.5) feet for lots with no residential occupaicy;
m.
A.
B-
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
I.
rV
A.
B.
2
o
(j) Side yard: Ten (10) feet from side lot line or one-half (1/2) the height of the principal
building, whichever is greater. (A. 79-132)
3.07.07 Maximum Height of Buildings: Twenty-five (25) feet.
3.07.08 Maximum Floor Area Rqtio: 0.50/1.0 and as funher provided under Supplementary
Regulations-
The approximate lot size ofthis parcel is 10,149 square feet. The applicanthas demonstrated
that l6is than 7, 611 square feet, (75'lo morimumlot coverage) ofthe lot has been covered.
The aoorooriat6 setbaiks have'blen complied with: The aip[icant has provided fifty feet
(50') hbm the centerline of the road, tenTeet (10') for sid,i ietbacks, arid twenty-fiv'e feet
(25'i from the rear lot line. The buildine heishi is at the maximum allowable limit of
twerity-nv" feet (25'). The applicant has 6mpfied with the requirements of 3.07.08 as the
total square footage of the entire building is 4,681 square feet.
Subdivisio+: Even though the applicant is not proposing to sell any of the dwellings
proposed, an aparhent is subject to meeting the County Subdivision Regulations based
on the definition of subdivision, which is as follows:
"The division of a lot, tract or parcel of land into two (2) or more lots, trocts, parcels or
separate interests, or the use of any parcel of landfor condominiums, apartments or
other multiple-d,vvelling units, as further defined by Colorado stote law."
Given this definition, Planning Staffhas become aware that Section 9:18 of the
Subdivision Regulations applies to this application which states, "No further subdivision
of a recorded subdivision is allowed, except where it is provided for in an approved
Preliminary Plon." The Board of County Commissioners currently have an application
to modifu the text of this regulation to allow further divisions of platted subdivisions if
the land is located in a higher density zone district than what has been platted. If this
regulation is amend.ed, this application will be in compliance with this regulation.
Soils/Topographv: HP Geotech performed a subsoil study on this properly on August 10,
2001. Due to the nattre of the soils found on the site, it is recommended that the building
be founded on spread footings placed on the natural subsoils and designed for an
allowable bearing pressure of 2,500 psf. The footings should also be designed for a
minimum dead load of 800 psf to limit the potential for heave if the bearing soils become
wetted. HP Geotech has also noted that it is important for them to provide consultation
during design, and field services during construction to review and monitor the
implementation of the geotechnical recommendations.
Michael Erion, the consulting engineer from Resource Engineering, also had a comment
relating to soils. The following comment, included within the overall engineering review,
states, *The SCS soils map indicates that the soils are from the Atencio-Azeltine group.
These soils are classified as hydrologic group B. The curye numbers for the dirt road and
landscape areas should be reduced accordingly." See exhibit E for entire letter.
o
C.
D
J
O
Road/Access/ Parking: Access to the site is direcfly offof Mel Ray Road, which is a
thirty-foot (30') right-of-way. A new driveway pennit will need to be acquired from the
Garfield County Road and Bridge Deparhent prior to the issuance of a building permit.
The following parking regulations apply to this application
2.02.40 OffStreet Porkins: An srea maintained on the lot in an accessible and
unobstructed conditionfor parking of automobiles by the residents, visitors, employees
and customers ofuses occupying the lot and shall be a minimum of two hundred (200)
square feet.
The latest application design Staffhas received complies with this regulation. The
parking lot sizes the applicant has provided is eight (8) 9' x 22.3' (200.7 square feet)
spaces and two oversized handicapped spaces.
5.01.02 Minimum W-Strest Parking: Parking spaces shall be providedfor each use in
thefollowing amounts:
(1) Residential (except group quarters)-one (1) space per six hundred (600)
square feet offloor ared or one (1) space per dwelling unit, whichever is greater,
each separately rentable room or group ofrooms shall be considered a dtvelling
unit,'
Under the regulation listed above, the applicant is required to provide six (6) parking
stalls as all of the proposed units are under 600 square feet when the definition of floor
area, as listed in Section 2.02.26 of the Zontng Regulations is applied. The applicant has
demonstrated sufFrcient parking pursuant to the regulations.
Fire Protection: The Glenwood Springs and Rural Fire Deparknent has responded to this
application stating that there is a sufficient water supply to accommodate the needs of the
subdivision, and the fire hydrants are conveniently located for firefighting operations.
See attached letter.
Water: Water service to this development will be provided by the City of Glenwood
Springs. The applicant has provided a letter from the City of Glenwood Public Works
Department that they can and will serve the units.
According to Sections 080.040.030 and 080.040.030.C.1 of the City of Glenwood
Springs code, however, the applicant will be required to enter into a pre-annexation
agreement with the City. Additionally, the applicant will be subject to City of Glenwood
Springs water improvement fees, a total of $9,234.10, at the time of building permit. See
attached letters from Jill Peterson, Planner, and Robin Millyard, Public Works Director.
Sewer: Sewer service to this development will be provided by the West Glenwood
Sanitation District. The applicant has provided a letter from the District stating that they
I
E.
G
F
4
H.
I
o o
can and will serve the units.
Drainage: The applicant is proposing to divert drainage created by the development to an
on-site dry well located immediately adjacent to the southern properly line. Michael
Erion, of Resource Engineering, has reviewed the project in reference to drainage issues
and has provided the following comments (See Exhibit E):
1. The proposed project will change the drainage pattem to the adjacent property
from a widely dispersed flow to a single point source discharge. The Applicant
must demonstrate ttrat the concentrated single point source of runoffdoes not
. adversely affect the adjacent properly.
2. The erosion and sediment control measures for construction should be shown on
the grading plan with appropriate details.
3. The adjacent uphill property contributes offsite drainage flow onto the subject
properly. Since the drainage plan concentrates flow to one area, the offsite
drainage should be included in the overall drainage analysis.
4. Based on the geotechnical investigation, the dry well will likely need to be 20 to
25 feet in depth. The proposed location of the dry well is immediately adjacent to
the properly line. Construction of the dry well at this location does not appear
feasible without impacting the adjacent property.
Assessment / Fees: This property is not located in a Traffic Study Areq and thus is not
subject to Road Improvement Fees. School Impact Fees, as to be determined, will need
to be paid at the time of Final Plat.
Utilities: The applicant has stated that Glenwood Electric will provide electicity, KN
Energy will provide natural gas, Qwest will provide telephone services, andAT&T
Broadband will provide cable service. Glenwood Electric has responded to this
application stating that a 'Customer Load Request Forrn' will need to be filed with the
Glenwood Springs Electric Deparhnent to determine if the existing transformer is large
enough to serve the new development. The request for service will need to be applied for
at the City Hall Electric Desk for temporary conskuction power and permanent power.
L. RECOMMENDED FINDINGS
That proper posting and public notice was provided, as required, for the hearing
before the Planning Commission;
That the meeting before the Planning Commi55ion was extensive and complete,that
all pertinent facts, matters and issues were submitted and that all interested parties
were heard at that hearing;
J
K.
I
2.
5
o
That for the above stated and other reasons, the proposed subdivision is in the best
interest of the healtlu safety, morals, convenience, order, prosperity and welfare of
the citizens of Garfield County;
That the application is in confonnance with the 1978 Garfield County Zoning
Resolution, as amended;
That the application is in oonformance with the Garfield Cormty Subdivision
Regulations of 1984.
M.
Planning Commission, by a 4-3 vote, recommends that the Board of County Commissioners
APPROVE 241 Mel Ray Road Subdivision Preliminary Plan, due to the following conditions:
1. That all representations made by the applicant in the application, and at the public
hearing before the Planning Commission, shall be conditions of approval, unless
specifically altered by the Planning Commission.
2. Amendment of Section 9:18 of the Garfield County Subdivision Regulations is
approved by the Board of County Commissioners.
3. A pre-arrnexation agreement with the City of Glenwood Springs and the applicant is
established between the City of Glenwood Springs and the applicant by the time of
Final Plat.
4. Water improvement fees, as defined by the City of Glenwood Springs, are paid to the
City at the time of building permit.
5. A new driveway permit from the Garfield County Road and Bridge Departrnent is
obtained by the time of Final Plat.
6. FIP Geotech shall be included to provide consultation dwing building construction to
review and monitor the implementation of the geotechnical recommendations.
7. The following drainage and soils issues are addressed within the Final Plat submittal:
The proposed project will change the drainage pattem to the adjacent
property from a widely dispersed flow to a single point sotrce discharge.
The Applicant must demonstrate that the concentrated single point source of
runoffdoes not adversely affect the adjacent properly.
o
J
4.
5.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIOf{
1
6
o o
The erosion and sediment control measures for construction should be
shown on the grading plan with appropriate details.
The adjacent uphill properly contributes offsite drainage flow onto the
subject property. Since the drainage plan concentrates flow to one are4 the
offsite drainage should be included in the overall drainage analysis.
Based on the geotechnical investigation, the dry well will likely need to be
20 to 25 feet in depth. The proposed location of the dry well is irnmediately
adjacent to the property line. Construction of the dry well at this location
does not appear feasible without impacting the adjacent property.
The SCS soils map indicates that the soils are from the Atencio-Azeltine
Soup. These soils are classffied as hydrologic group B. The curve numbers
for the dirt road and landscape areas should be reduced accordingly.
8. The following PlatNotes shall be included onthe Final p1u1'
1. All exterior lighting will be the minimum amount necessary and all exterior
lighting will be directed inward, towards the interior of the subdivision,
except that provisions may be made to allow for safety lighting that goes
beyond the property boundaries.
2. No open hearth solid-fuel fireplaces will be allowed anywhere within the
subdivision. One (1) new solid-fuel burning stove as defied by C.R.S. 25-7401 ,
et. sew., and the regulations promulgated thereunder, d[ be allowed in any
dwelling unit. A11 dwelling units will be allowed an unrestricted number of
natural gas buming stoves and appliances.
3. One (t) dog shall be allowed for each residential unit within a subdivision; and
the dog shall be required to be confined within the owner's property boundaries.
The requirement shall be included in the lease agreement for the subdivision,
with enforcement provisions allowing for the removal of a dog frorn the
subdivision as a final remedy in worst cases.
2
3
4
5
7
6hitz* h o o RECEIVEDDEC2 72001
December 26,2001
Ms. Kim Schlagel
Garfield County Building and Planning
109 86 Street, Suite 301
Glenwood Springs, Colorado
RE: 241MeI Ray Road
Dear Ms. Schlagel:
Thank you for the referral for the above referenced item. Attached please find comments from
Robin Millyard, the City's Public Works Director.
I have also enclosed a copy of Sec. 080.040.030, regarding the City's policy on water line
extension as addressed in the Glenwood Springs Municipal Code. "We understand that the
subject property is currently being served with City water viaa3l4 in. water tap. The application
indicates this service is to be enlarged to a4 in. tap. The change in use will require the payment
of water improvement fees as outlined in Mr. Millyard's memo.
In addition to system improvement fees, Section 080.040.030.C.1. of the Code requires an
applicant to obtain the approval of City Council to enlarge v*ater lines or any appurtenances.
Sec. 080.040.030.C.2. provides details on the information that is required from the applicant.
Additionally, please be aware that the applicant will need to enter into a pre-arurexation
agreement with the City of Glenwood Springs. For more information on the pre-annexation
agreement, please contact the City Attomey's office. For more details on the application
requirements, please contact Robin Millyard.
If you have any additional questions, please feel free to contact our office at945-2575.
Yours truly,
Planner
cc: City Attorney's office
Robin Millyard, Public Works Director
RO6 COOPF,R AVF,NIIF, GI.F,N$TOOD.qPRINGS- COT.C)RADC) RI60I C)7OIq4\-?575 FAX:94l'J.\97
Ex{ui+ D o o
1
MEMORAIVDUM
TO: GARFIELD PLANNING DEPARTMENT
FROM: ROBIN MILLYARD, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
DATE: DECEMBER26,2001
SUBJECT: COMMENTS ON TI{E PROPOSED 6-PLEX AT 241MEL RAY ROAD
It was not clear to me if these were to be rental units, or individually sold. If they are to be
separately owned, now or in the future, provisions should be incorporated for individual services
and meters, for water and electric, unless a homeowners association would be responsible for the
utility bills.
The existing water service originates from a 314" tap. The plans call for this line to be up sized
to 4". Section 080.060.020.A of the Municipal Code provides a schedule for calculating
residential EQR's for multi-unit structures. A 6-plex equates to 3.5 EQR. The existing use will
be credited for one (1) EQ& for a single family structure, therefore a Water System
Improvement Fee equivalent to 2.5 EQR would be assessed. Extending the per EQR fee for
2002 of $3,693.64, atotal of $9,234.10 would be due to the City of Glenwood Springs at the
issuance of the building permit.
The existing 314" water service will need to be abandoned, at the main. The new 4" service will
need to be installed as a "hot tap," that is, while the main is energized. The new service shall be
placed over the old tap, and the City will shut the main down long enough to allow the contractor
to remove the 314" saddle and install the new 4" tapping saddle. The contractor shall install a 4"
gate valve at the tapping tee, secured with megalug connections. The discharge side of the new
4" gate valve will become the point of private responsibility for maintenance and ownership of
the new 4" service.
Coordinate the new service installation with the Water Deparffnent prior to commencing any
work. The contact person is Buddy Burns, at945-7685, between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 3:30
p.m.
XC: Buddy Burns
7
3
4.
fix c oM
discussion it is my understanding
basement level and consisting
Access is East offof
fromthe pavement
Fire Code.
o RrcEtvEDJAti i12tlo2
y/ill be a two story structure having a
feet.
0t/10/02
Kim Schlagel
109 8n Street, Suite 301
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Dear (im,
I offer the following comments towards the Cinderbetts Subdivision project located at 241Mel
Rey road here in Glenwood Springs. After the site plan dated 12-05-01, and our
approximately 84 feet
compliance with the Uniform
and I enclosed the
The project has two
just south of the project.
Code and are
Chief Piper.
Water supply
results of the
hydrants, one at
Both of these
conveniently located
Ifyou need any
for would be 1r1
test the
'.i.,
' i''
Bi[ Harding, Battalion
CC: Mike Piper, Fire Chief
806 COOPER AVENL'E GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81601 9701945-4942 FAX 9701945-6040
Dxhibi+ D o o
ST{TE OF CCLORAD
COTORADO GEOLOCICAT SURVEY
Division of Minerals and Ceology
Department of Natural Resources
'I 3l3 Sherman Street, Room 715
Denver; Colorado 80203
Phone: (303) 866-2611
FAX: (303) 866-2461
January 9,2002
GA-02-0005
DEPARTMENT ONAIURAI
RESOLIRCEI
Bill Owens
Covernor
Greg E. Walcher
Executive Director
Michael B. Long
Division Director
Vicki Cowart
State GeoloBist
and Director
Kim Schlagel
Garfield County Building and Plan:ring
109 8th Street, Suite 301
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
RE: 241 Mel Ray Road Geologic Hazard Review
Dear Ms. Schiagel:
Thank you for the land-use submittal. At your request and in accordance to
Senate Bill 35 (1972) the Colorado Geological Survey has completed a geolo gichazard
review of the above-mentioned development. Included in the submittal from your office
was a subsoils investigation by HP Geotech and Drainage Study by High Country
Engineering. A three-story apartment building is proposed for the location.
The CGS has reviewed the application documents and reports, and concurs with
their site assessments, specifically the geologic and soils conditions, and foundation
design recommendations. We reiterate that surface drainage is very important and the
recommendations on Page 5 of the IIP Geotech Subsoil Study should not be dismissed as
unimportant. Wetting and saturation of the subsoils may result in adverse settlem'ent in
the future. Provided the developer, and his builder and landscape consultant, adheres to
the plans submitted, and the recommendations of the geotechnical consultant are
complied with, the CGS has no concerns with the development as intended. If you have
any questions, please contact this office at (303) 866-3551 or e-mailr
i onathan.white@state. co.us
Sincerely,
onathan L.
Engineering Geologist
'-'DYhibit7
IITII rIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIT
oFIEUFIGE RECEIVEDJAN 172flL2
ENGINEEFlING ING
Ms. Kim Schlagel
Garfield County Building and Planning Dept
1Og 8th Street, Suite 303
Glenwood Springs CO 81601
January 16, 2OO2
RE: 241 Mel Rey Road, PreliminarrT Plan Review
Dear Kim:
At the request of Garfield County, Resource Engineering, lnc. (RESOURCE) has
reviewed the preliminary plan submittal for the proposed six-plex building at 241 Mel
Rey Road near Glenwood Springs. Our review focused on drainage issues, however we
also reviev.red other technical issues presented in the subrnittal. Based on our review
we offer the following comments.
1. The proposed project will change the drainage pattern to the adjacent property
from a widely dispersed flow to a single point source discharge. The Applicant
must demonstrate that the concentrated single point source of runoff does not
adversely affect the adjacent property.
2. The erosion and sediment control measures for construction should be shown
91 therg.Iadilg. plan with appropriate details.
3. The adjacent uphill property contributes offsite drainage flow onto the subject
property. Since the drainbge plan concentrates flow to one area, the offsite
drainage sh91ld be included in the overalidrainage analysis.
4. The SCS soils map indicates that the soils are from the Atencio-Azeltine group.
These soils are classified as hydrologic group B. The curve numbers for the dirt' road and landscape areas should be reduced accordingly.
5. Based on the geotechnical investigation, the dry well will likely need to be 20
to 25 feet in depth. The proposed location of the dry well is immediately
acijacent to tlre property line. Construetion of the dry well at this location does
not appear feasible without impacting the adjacent property.
Please call if you have any questions or need additional information,
Sincerely,
RESOURCE ENGI NG, INC
Michael J. Eri , P,E.
Water Resou Engineer
MJE/mmm
885-8.0 ks mel rey road.B8s.wpd
Consultlng Engineers and Hydnologists
9O9 Colonado Avenue I Glenwood Spnings, CE A160l I (97A)945-6777 I Fax lgTO)g4E-1137
o o
To The Planning Commission Of Garfield County:
Yj h* very stong concerns about ttre traffic and parking for the proposed site at 024lMelRay Rd.
There is no offstreet parking along Mel Ray, there is not even enoigh room for a pedestrian lane on either sideofthe sfreet.
Mel Ray is a direct route to I-70 and Midland Ave. with no traffic control. Traffic speeds exceed 40 mph at all
Times, lost Semi truck drivers non-stop, and many school buses. It's dangerous to back out of your driveway,
Or go to your mailbox.
A six-unit aparhnent building with 10 parking spots will consume that property, which means any kid,s will
have to play in the street, and friends visiting will have to park at Los Desperaios and walk up. And good luck
Getting by Blaine Ward Towing Trucks parked in the steet, right across 6om ttre fire department.
Cinderbetts LLC rented the trailer that is there now to a (single family), with no control, there was 5 to l0
vehicles coming and going,all day and night, parking anywhere they could. 10 to 15 men everyday,
Even Christnas day, standing outside by the road drinking beer and passing around a bottle. At"i S months
In January Mr. Stuarts truck was parked in the street, Laura Merritt ipoke io him to complain about the
situation. Notling was done.
The Merritt's then contacted the Sheriff s deparhnent and were told there was nothing they could do, the county
has no noise ordience, but to call them at 1:00 am, when it was still loud,'and they would ro*r by, the Officer
said sometimes just there presence on the scene, make people quite down
Mr. Stuart was then contacted byKevin Merritt, he finally toldthem to take it inside.
That lasted 1 week, we started taking pictures, and they moved out.
Thank you !
Neighbors opposed to the new site @0241Mel ray Rd.
Signatures Attached
RECEIVED |,lAR 0 b 2002
o
tdl {Ad
oflLi ltt/ll7
o^,yl trJ,lfl9
oalo rrl4 8o,1
o162 '?'z'LoZ /An @
RC
B{
Rd,
o 3..=? 5
tlr
/ ?b 3ec<en-6;€ (d \Ld 2 r ao-4
ffil+ /uiZ,etr /U fi/aat
o4/b M%4,ywt6////.A frurll'*
fflj,rbtr,
{rryfu,
bJa^-)"*+
&
o
t(A ec
q
w *r c.
(tA
r
6t''ss co
6ats co
2 -s oo ?jg) I
Lws Lo <tbOl
forls' d-, 7/6 a t '
-qf;--*-ao $1La r
aZr-Jn@f,/ta.w:22
C,J 0o^3 ftrct q
8-O \
2-
D
D
d
bv'b
?o
R qHfl
€^,W LC
I
(
&,Y/ t
RECE1VEp HAR 0 t
o
% Ttl€, Boneo CItr fl"r/1 (or^,ssro,o&s !
/0"
a
,/t)€ CIotr-Lo ot KE To ud /Ou lluoco €XftCTLy DHfrT
ilnppe,om Ffr oa4l rneu RAq lRD,
. nn R. SalAar TOLO TH€ P d z cornm lss loilsps, Hoo HL:;
COrnpffDq TAKE eftAE oF _l_H teR_ pnopgnfrgs t trEorrr. C*geAt rcb
PmfE Nurrneses, DF-tVtn:ra TSg To CXEoK B,SNIaRS 1 ECf,
ile 'T)LD uS fr a€€rc qT€f t-t HqT HE. m€na;r rtrs Bt@6ot-
Pfoeaert€>, A$D T+eV scpr oF fue@T ,1eour r^so ReV RO,
[luero 6 Teoeeetl nRN Wsy eflms By To r-ooK ftf SAeroOs
Pmc-e NeKT Dcoe Fce sAL^g, (J)g ToLD Hrnr. (^)HNT uJfts
Got,sco oro, r{e sArs ttI'tu c,\LL €rl". He toguae rcLD
ftroQo$e. Bt TH6 -r,rr\g u)e s(tul w\R. STu&pf, (.()E
Hfts lo bq f-HE ?ocr c-€ lpeoLueD,
UOe LtugD thc F€ne- oF H\s -t1e rofEns R)?- b n^o^JTr.t's.
.NoN- sToP -DRrroRtroa, TEAFFTc-, Fconn Tloo Rn^ lo (lOO A,rrt,
b€ #Kea THern s€voPAL Trr^Es To rAK€ rt losrDq o?-
Ar L€ftS-r rc TH e BfteKl ARD , NO-pg I o tu oHft pca5D{ rr"DTt L
- (^:e st'fte\glc -t-ftKtloo pteT\regs - THgq rnoue D (rwt,
Hnpx
e)
o o
TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMSSIONERS:
WE OPPOSE TI{E NEW SITE @ 0241tvIE,L RAY RD.
1. TRATHC VOLUME EXCESSIVE (STUDY NEEDS DONE NOW)
2. NO PARKING FOR VISITORS
3. NO PLACE FOR KIDS TO PLAY EXCEPT STREET
4. NO PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY
5. CINDERBETTS LLC DOES NOT CONTROL TIIEIR RENTERS, OR TAKE RESPONSABILTY.
TIIANK YOU !
NErGr{BORS OPPOSED TO Tr{E NEW SrTE @ 0241 MEL RAy RD
SIGNATURES ATTACHED
TO TIIE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS:
WE OPPOSE TI{E NEW SITE @ 024rtvEL RAY RD.
t. TRArrFrc voLUME EXCESSTVE (STUDY NEEDS DONE NOW)
2. NO PARKING FOR VISITORS
3. NO PLACE FOR KIDS TO PLAY EXCEPT STREET
4. NO PEDESTRI.AN WALKWAY
5. CINDERBETTS LLC DOES NOT CONTROL TIIEIR RENTERS, OR TAKE RESPONSABILTY
TI{ANK YOU I
NETGHBORS OPPOSED TO Tr{E NEW SrTE @ 0241 MEL RAy RD
TURES ATTACHED
o o
(ilarril- ctq/ /n-/ ru-M_
Crfr fU E-/r1
1.ru/'i/7 o/7O
\^,\- a L-Lc !r2l*
o o
TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
WE OPPOSE TI{E NEW SITE @ 0241\,/EL RAY RD.
1. TRAIIFIC VOLUME EXCESSTVE (STUDY NEEDS DONE NOW)
2. NO PARKING FOR VISITORS
3. NO PLACE FOR KIDS TO PLAY EXCEPT STREET
4. NO PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY
5. CINDERBETTS LLC DOES NOT CONTROL THEIR RENTERS, OR TAI(E RESPONSABILTY
THANK YOU !
NEIGI{BORS OPPOSED TO TI{E NEW SITE @ 0241r\EL RAY RD.
SIGNATURES ATTACIIED
od,// fu* ,eq/n &(
\.Ul tu/;-E>88 /-{1a,.frrlr""
e2?/
o
TO TIM BOARD OF COLINTY COMMSSIONERS
WE OPPOSE TI{E NEW SITE @ 0241l\/EL RAY RD.
1. TRAFFTC VOLUME EXCESSTVE (STUDY NEEDS DONE NOW)
2. NO PARKING FOR VISITORS
3. NO PLACE FOR KIDS TO PLAY EXCEPT STREET
4. NO PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY
5. CINDERBETTS LLC DOES NOT CONTROL T}MIR RENTERS, OR TAKE RESPONSABILTY
THANK YOU !
NETGHBORS OPPOSED TO TI{E NEW SrTE @ 024INEL RAy RD
SIGNATURES ATTACHED
o
anr g arr 6/6?
9et
C/,"ffr*/ A'Z* f S
Oeao- O'*' 4-s'
0+/{ lva Rc 6s
tlt(
o/// ril?/ tr7 /t/, ig
\Ddry-a r // /7,-1 fu /f,l JJZ3
({^Uyna^} {o^4 o t4q {\u llr y rL () t4
I
/t!)u, f^-1 o t44 /il"l ry fil #/
/faVtP ( Lnuta
0e4f rrta 8a,f BD
3 8L{- | ,l trl
o o
TO THE BOARD OF COTINTY COMMISSIONERS
wE opposE TI{E NEW SrrE @ 0241 MEL RAy RD.
1' TRr{ITIC voLUME ExcESSrvE (sruDy NEEDS DONE Now)
2, NO PARKING FOR VISITORS
3. NO PLACE FOR KIDS TO PLAY EXCEPT STREET
4. NO PEDESTRTAN WALKWAY
5. CINDERBETTS LLC DOES NOT CONTROL TI{EIR RENTERS, OR TAKE RESPONSABILTY
THANK YOU !
NEIGIAORS OPPOSED TO TI{E NEW SITE @ O24I\ELRAY RD.
SIGNATURES ATTACI{ED
?^*,n'."- 3nr,n*rJ-,G*s
d,
o C!
o o
o/E 3 ,/A, / S/oil,*r Df, 6-5,/./74 Ht, 54a/^t br.
ol),t /,lfnSLedo* D,,
Le /e n d P rcier.os a,{ l4t, S,{q Q o *s
K ris fle.melve OW 'rn+"\ *^rLJovrs Dr
W Nern<-l V"-
(;,s
Dn,S;S
6,t.
6.s@
Slao/
OQry1 ,f,ay'r.s Dr 65, ?/da
&S ,2.4t-ilaAlspe-Gp" cla4
4
"/ &.s,(o ficor
0:6) Du^ ega*t nJ gos Co ulo I
0lb3 5l',sJ'r.> Pr. 6.S . Eltao Irt'\fn
hina/*5 HJ,, Dr.frilo t
c Kb / )rbl
Fo Jcr /S {Z {* w+.
Oal1e kr)6,s Pa2
ww
hs
-{kB s/b I
X
o//5
ot@
?Pt Bo
oo1 {
00(t
fir,fr Oot I otwyl,o*-t
eda".
C.r^ GDs
e-, q1N5l
o
Cw
r /r7 d- fousten
o
G*AR o&&o
o30/
am hil!^;-
.7* ff,rtr^
A ;al^*! v. ,p.r,?\
n*td O 2 \ \ DoW. 3c:-,t t" cl d . \"1 t
0 z?fl 7..^,4.-ueo)r_P/Lot
OSC\'/3C fr"od-
n n6a ourftt/d Bd, 8s el,Us .
ol?^ Ary,qa,J tzd &aX
?o 5 /a f/, G, eu- r //{,7
07y7 /)oa tl r7a- R/ 6 t^.t S
ZU&r;,F a//?@sa/,"4//Ll(l&-o {//6ass
0 q+{ - f Z, H- e-o5
a Wt lU' Bv,s
4\sd,0-t4/
Pa t/yq f C, , GWs
Ga:S
Gcx
B/bor
Srucl
916 o/7h/
V//o/
d*01
zvn<! R1
,aor,.-b*-. '
CL'--!e 6UJ,
<ir. tt Gt a
I
flz,rc
<l60 \
El6 o1
>1bo/
t/d- (
f,tla 1
aluot
6coS
3o ?,
d /Z? fl*"i,n kr^rb,-,: GtrS yt {o t
OroS Hour*nr.^- Stnactauls Dr. 6(-JS
QO g l4t^ &tad.out:; D"- aps&" &-,-:
Qt>=
frs n'ub"klmo/*"n ty,&/r;o7
'/vo
thn )L{"ut
5[uAr" s
8t uat
hb o,
Zr.(
91/ dt
t ?c $,r'r >
6rr:Ltr ot0
rhAty,-
\( u\rv
3 tftIt\Slu/or^r '\.,.
o
fTJu/,e,Aus
-&/,Js
4;z--s@02VzrzryAdtd
-tk,l*a)-,_n il"*uA* -Jdt?@1/,7 >d4-q fe^a64i r
-,--t-*.Tffit"ru oj-t f /n/ Pa- tA-
lr OW ftriFft,
o
-&so*
.U.*A.H&eirr
,6Arrowv[e-tsvw
*duL;,*/ f F 7,14n
a/77
ot/7?
au73/C
CI-'
t*r f4
Rq e4
&a**sq
%lrnwa4 sf
d2*,0-Ua!
Ott\ rt^a^tl,1 l1 stdoa
-a tze- L(
?-o t
?et
oil7 rw
PtruS
6 !vro,{.og
G(-t)S
otu-s
G tr:S
Gt^rf
G h)9
G*5
6hS
Gas
G(,dJ6 5.
65
/
1
dz}6
Aot rVltt E .y
"J(b6 Ctlkpruel ,
6b}b C.lLhffM4
a r' j3 / 30 +4*42,uf)2 t)oJ '
$t k&ad,ute-,
1/.?11 t35
97r
4qr7
5/o,,e,:rl-re tt'
c*4//91r"
fiu*Ce lo-..f^,- .- ,/.,/ f2--./.r,
F $ QHU?T
THeul srooo
To O 9'^lK
';ffi'$-i
DH7N N€ frn^/ rHen )FF ouP DPluew'nq',s
THeq :rqsT PftR(eD I'u THe ste-eeT.