HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication- Permit• Garfield County
Building & Sanitation Department
108 8`h Street, Suite #201 Glenwood Springs, Co. 81601
Office- 945-8212 Inspectio Line- 3 4-5003
c71 V �
Job Address ;Mr
Nature of Work Buildin Permit Ro
NO. CIat-1 lc)
e_. t42..
-CC) -ave
Use of Building � �.‘40. u,/9:iv,i' I �� dQckt 4-
Owner V 41CITOL6(101 pod
V_e_,nJ C_iprrotra 3 r)rl
Amount of Permit $1.01.(06 Date S' - r
Contractor
Clerk
GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION
108 8`" Street, Suite 201, Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Phone: 970-945-8212 / Fax: 970-384-34701 Inspection Line: 970-384-5003
Permit No: 9
Job Address:
Parcel/Schedule No: .3't6 3- O 4 0 D --04`O
1 Lot No: �� r 1 ocl i No: Subd. / Exemption: 1V`
tier
"Ltf C �'" j
VA -flay 4�d
2
Owner: 1 f
rtJ[�� uo r NS �
Address ST 4SPQJ
(C7� W • Ay � I'
Ph: ''gS 9 O 7' [7ci
3h ? 1
3
Contractor: !!
Idea COmS1�TD
Address:
bA33 (-arie ( 60.0.5
Ph:
(i'fs g.).-- y
Lic. No.
aOYd
4
l
Archctl gineer
' e
t -1•o yji Q-Vdij.
Address
42.01 4r4A+k84It
Ph:
v.'7 6710
Lic. Np.
A:_610•13.)a5 4
5
Sq. Ff ojr$uildiag:
11� vc7'r
Sq. Ft/if Lot:
jif Cre,S
Height: I
30
No. of Floors:
6
Use of Building:
S rrGu 1 �'u r. evtuArtAi a fr< .
7
Describe Work: +jA1
wooLfr4Mt 1..1i
M5PM.
8
Class of Work: ew o Alteration ❑ Remove
dvN
o Addition o Move
9
10
Garage: o Single
o Double 'Di Pr
Carport: ❑ Single
o Double
X Dr'veway P it o'' On -Site Sewage Disposal o Site Plan
(5epticl
11
Valua Ion of rk: $
Adjusted Valuations: 5 6602/7 (9C?, t
12
Special Conditions:
A SEPARATE
ISSUED
THIS
AUTHORIZED
CONSTRUCTION
PERIOD
1 HEREBY
APPLICATION
PROVISIONS
COMPLETED
GRANTING
TO VIOLATE
LOCAL
OFCONST
NOTICE
ELECTRICAL PERMIT IS REQUIRED
BY THE STATE OF COLORADO.
PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR
IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 180 DAYS,
OR WORK 1S SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED
OF 180 DAYS AT ANYTIME AFTER WORK IS
CERTIFY THAT 1 HAVE READ AND
AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND
OF LAWS GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK
WITHIN WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN
OF A PERMIT DOES NOT PRESUME TO
OR CANCEL THE PROVISIONS OF ANY
LAW REGULATING CO STRUCTION OR THE
' CTI "r
AND MUST BE
CONSTRUCTION
OR, IF
FOR A
COMMENCED.
EXAMINED THIS
CORRECT. ALL
WILL BE
OR NOT. THE
GIVE AUTHORITY
OTHER STATE OR
PERFORMANCE
Plan Check Fee:
4245:c
Permit Fee:
400840
Total Fee: Dated Permit Issued:
/ 44•5,0:3
OCC Group: Const. Type:
4 r/ 1
`t ISL
Zoning:
Setbacks:
Manu. Home: ISDS No. & Fee: gr
A� y�-
'4
M "�1
�� ' 1
• iiii,•f�I sl+ ER A�
J' sit
` � o4#i 0 " " i/74ip ' ice./50
�i�.�,��
. G D ' PT '
' APPRO � !DATE AP' � ,
7
AGREEMENT
PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO THE APPLICANT AS OWNER, CONTRACTOR AND/OR THE AGENT OF THE CONTRACTOR OR OWNER TO CONSTRUCT
THE STRUCTURE AS DETAILED ON PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SUBMITTED TO AND REVIEWED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT.
IN CONSIDERATION OF THE 1SSSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT, THE SIGNER. HEREBY AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL BUILDING CODES AND LAND USE
REGULATIONS ADOPTED BY GARFIELD COUNTY PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GIVEN IN 30.28.201 CRS AS AMENDED. THE SIGNER FURTHER AGREES THAT
IF THE ABOVE SAID ORDINANCES ARE NOT FULLY COMPILED WITH IN THE LCOATION, ERECTION, CONSTRUCTION, AND USE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED
STRUCTURE, THE PERMIT MAY BE REVOKED BY NOTICE FROM THE COUNTY AND THAT THEN AND THERE IT SHALL BECOME NULL AND VOID.
THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMT BASED UPON PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA SHALL NOT PREVENT THE BUILDING OFFICIAL FROM THEREAFTER
REQUIRING THE CORRECTION OF ERRORS IN SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA OR FROM PREVENTING BUILDING OPERATION BEING
CARRIED ON THEREUNDER WHEN IN VIOLATION OF THS CODE OR ANY OTHER ORDINANCE OR REGULATION OF THIS JURISDICTION.
THE REVIEW OF SUBMITTED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND INSPECTIONS CONDUCTED THEREAFTER DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ACCEPTANCE OF
ANY R:SPONSIBILITIES OR LIABLITIES BY GARFIELD COUNTY FOR ERRORS, OMISSIONS OR DISCREPENCIES. THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THESE ITEMS
AND IMPLEMENTATION DURING CONSTRUCTION RESTS SPECIFICIALLY WITH THE ARTICTECT, DESIGNER, BUILDER, AND OWNER. COMMENTS ARE
INTENDED TO BE CONSERVATIVE AND IN SUPPORT OF THE OWNERS INTEREST.
G.rtom.003
J r! I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE AGREEMENT ABOVE (INITIAL):
1i llor AO14OIi(t f� �- 7` D !L
The following items are required by Garfield County for a final inspection:
1. A final Electrical Inspection from the Colo cleWeE ca ' I litiTor;
2. Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department posted where readily
visible from access road;
3. A finished roof, a lockable house, complete exterior siding, exterior doors and windows
installed, a complete kitchen with cabinets, a sink with hot & cold running water, non-absorbent
kitchen floor coverings, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove and refrigerator, all
necessary plumbing;
4. A complete bathroom, with washbowl, tub or shower, toilet stool, hot and cold running water,
non-absorbent floors and walls finished and a privacy door;
5. All steps outside or inside over three (3) steps must have handrails, guard rails on balconies or
decks over 30" high constructed to all 1997 UBC requirements;
6. Outside grading done to where water will detour away from the building;
7. Exceptions to the outside steps, decks and grading may be made upon the demonstration of
extenuating circumstances, i.e. weather, but a Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until
all the required items are completed and a final inspection made;
8. A final inspection sign off by the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department for driveway
installation, where applicable; as well as any final sign off by the Fire District, where applicable.
A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE
ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED.
****CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY
(C.O.) IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL BE
CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATING
PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET.
I understand and agree to abide by the above conditions for occupancy use and the issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy for the dwelling under building permit # .
77.7 74 `74
Signature Date
Bpcont03/2004
VALUATION/FEE DETERMINATION
Applicant IF l�ic,atpi
Address,¢O// (i?Ss4 - z i Qp
Date 8.
Finished (Livable Area):
Main '59x0
Upper
59 8
Lower rj
Other
Subdivision
Lot/Block
Contractor K �1cti
co 1,
Total Square Feet 7j ! 5/011/7
Valuation
Basement:
Unfinished
Conversion of Unfinished to Finished
Plan Check Fee for Conversion
/81
Valuation /0/ � .0-"J
Garage:
Valuation A...7 / 65, 7o40
Crawl Space:
Valuation 415/0 ,'L
yq,
Decks/Patios:
Covered 2+ (�� , �1.
Valuation 7 S A
Open
Valuation
Total Valuation
6 4z, 7q
1
i,
GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING
970-945-8212
MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS
for
SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING CONSTRUCTION
including
NEW CONSTRUCTION
ADDITIONS
ALTERATIONS
and
MOVED BUILDINGS
In order to understand the scope of the work intended under a permit application and expedite the
issuance of a permit it is important that complete information be provided. Adequate and complete
information will prevent delays in the plan review process. Reviewing a plan and the discovery that
required information has not been provided by the applicant may result in the delay of the permit
issuance and in proceeding with building construction. The owner or contractor may be required to
provide this information before the plan review may proceed. This causes delays because other plans
that are in line for review may be given attention before the new information may be reviewed after
it has been provided to the Building Department.
Please review this document to determine if you have enough information to design your
project and provide adequate information to facilitate a plan review. If you do not, it may be
helpful to obtain a book titled "Dwelling Construction under the Uniform Building Code".
This book is available to you through this department at our cost. Also, please consider using
a design professional for assistance in your design and a construction professional for
construction of your project.
To provide for a more understandable plan in order to determine compliance with the building,
plumbing and mechanical codes, applicants are requested to review the following checklist prior to
and during design. Applicants are required to indicate appropriately and to submit the
completed checklist at time of application for a permit.
Plans to be included for a Building Permit, must be on drafting paper at least 18"x24" and
drawn to scale.
Plans must include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations all sides with
decks, balcony, steps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the finish grade line.
A section showing in detail, from the bottom of the footing to the top of the roof, including re -bar,
anchor bolts, pressure treated plates, floor joists, wall studs and spacing, insulation, sheeting, house -
rap, (which is required), siding or any approved building material.
A window schedule. A door schedule. A floor framing plan, a roof framing plan, roof must be
designed to withstand a 40 pound per square foot up to 7,000 feet in elevation, an 80 M.P.H.
windshear, wind exposure B, windload of 15 pounds per square foot, and a 36 inch frost depth.
All sheets to be identified by number and indexed. All of the above requirements must be met or
your plans will be returned.
All plans submitted must be incompliance with the 1997 UBC, UMC and 1997 UPC.
1. Is a site plan included that identifies the location of the proposed structure or addition and
distances to the property lines from each corner of the proposed structure(s) prepared by a
licensed surveyor and has the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing?
Properties with slopes of 30% or greater must be shown on the site plan. NOTE: 106.3.1
(7.) Any site plan for the placement of any portion of a structure within 50 ft. of a
property line and not within a previously surveyed building envelope on a subdivision
final plat shall be prepared by a licensed surveyor and have the surveyors signature and
professional stamp on the drawing. Any structure to be built within a building envelope
of a lot shown on a recorded subdivision plat, shall include a copy of the building
envelope as it is shown on the final plat with the proposed structure located within the
envelope./
Yes
2. Does the site plan also include any other buildings on the property, setback easements and
utility easements? Please refer to Section 5.05.03 in the Garfield County Zoning Resolution
if the propert you are applying for a building permit on is located on a comer lot. Special
setbacks apply.
Yes
3. Does the site plan include when applicable the location of the I.S.D.S. (Individual Sewage
Disposal Sys m) and the distances to the property lines, wells (on subject property and
adjacent p perties), streams or water courses?
Yes
4. Does the site plan indicajthe location and direction of the County or private road accessing
the property? Yes ✓
2
s
}
5. Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all
reinforcing steel in accordance with the uniform building code or per stamped engineered
design?
Yes
6. Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl
spaces an, the clearances required between wood and earth?
Yes �/
7. Do the plans indicate the size and location of ventilation openings for the attic, roof joist
spaces'siid soffits?
Yes
8. Do the plans include design loads as required by Garfield County for roof snow loads, (a
minimum of 40 pounds per square foot up to & including 7,000 feet above sea level), floor
loads an ind Loads?
Yes
9. Does the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor, and roof
constructi n?
Yes
10. Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists, wall studs, ceiling
joists, roo rafters or joists or trusses?
Yes
11. Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method of positive connection
of all columns and beams?
Yes
12. Does the plan indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the highest point
of the building or addition measured at mid span between the ridge and the eave down to
existing (updisturbed) grade contours?
Yes
13. Does the plan include any stove or zero clearance fireplace planned for installation including
make and podel and Colorado Phase II certifications or phase II EPA certification?
Yes ✓ No
14. Does the plan include a masonry fireplace including a fireplace section indicating design to
comply with alae Uniform Building Code Chapter 37?
Yes / No
s
15. Does the plan i elude a window schedule or other verification that egress/rescue windows
from sleepin rooms and/or basements comply with the requirements of the Uniform
Building C e?
Yes No
16. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that windows provide natural
light and vexation for all habitable rooms?
Yes / No
17. Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass doors,
glazing immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as
a walking s ce; sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub enclosures
and specify afety glazing for these areas?
Yes No
18. Is the locatio of all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces, boilers and water heaters
indicated o the plan?
Yes No
19. Do you under and that if you are building on a parcel of land created by the exemption
process or subdivision process, are building plans in compliance with all plat notes and/or
covenants
Yes 1 No
20. Do you understand that if you belong to a homeowners association, it is your responsibility
to obtain written permission from the association, if required by that association, prior to
submitting an pplication for a building permit? The building permit application will not be
accepted out it.
Yes No
21. Will this be the only residential sture on the parcel?
Nm -re4
Yes No If no -Explain: ID U 64,i/J GAS �y
22. Have two 2} complete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the application?
Yes
IQ,
C4. Special
23. Do you and stand that the minimum dimensions a home can be on a lot is 20ft.wide andSe
20ft. long? fv`°
Yes No
24. Have you signed or had this plan designed while considering building and other
constructs code requirements?
Yes No
4
Department at 625-8601 or refer to the phone book for the State Highway Departments
phone num
Yes No
34. Do you understand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed Electrician
and Plumber to perform installations and hookups, unless you as the homeowner are
performing the work? The license number of the person performing the work will be
required at ti a of applicable inspection.
Yes No
35. Are you aware, that on the front of the Building Permit Application you will need to fill in
the Parcel/Sche e Number for the lot you are applying for this permit on prior to submittal
of a building ermit application? Your attention in this is appreciated.
Yes i No
36. Do you know that the local fire d' 'ct may require you to submit plans for their review of
fire safety issues? Yes No (please check with the
building department about this requirement)
37. Are you aware, that 'f you receive your water and/or sewer from an Association, District, or
Municipality yo ill be required to provide the County with a copy the Tap Permit (or
evidence of exemption) at the time of the building permit pplication submittal?
Yes No N/A
38. If you are within five (5) miles of the City of Rifle or the Town of Parachute, have you
checked with them concerning water shed protection zone permit requirements for : 1 S and
other activities? Yes No N/A
I hereby acknowledge that I have read, understand and answered these questions to the
best of my ability.
Signature
Phone: 37 c 9 co it (days);
Project Name:
77
Date
1-tS $ 3- a- tf (evenings)
Project Address: -Q i ( F" f 7 S "-a1 6 r r _
Notes: If you have answered "No" on any of the questions, you may be required to provide this
information at the request of the Building Official prior to beginning the plan review process.
Delays in issuing the permit are to be expected. Work may not proceed without the issuance of a
6
permit. If it is determined by the Building Official that additional information is necessary to review
the application and plans to determine minimum compliance with the adopted codes, the application
may be placed behind more recent applications for building permits in the review process and not
reviewed until required information has been provided and the application rotates again to first
position for review, delay in issuance of the permit or delay in proceeding with construction.
Bpminreg04/2004
7
JUI CA UT utitap
•
July 21, 2004
To Whom it May Concern:
I authorize Stephen Kennedy to act as agent to sign permit
applications for the property at 4011 Crystal Bridge Drive,
Garfield County, Colorado, also known as Lot 360, River Valley
Ranch, Carbondale. Colorado.
Any questions, please contact attorney Millard Zimet at
970-925-9009.
Wing • dings
PO
Ge(51-1 teCh
HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL
April 30, 2004
Kennedy Construction
Attn: Steve Kennedy
0233 Homeplace
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601
Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc
5020 County Rad 154
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601
Phone: 970-945-7988
Fax: 970-945-M54
email• hpgco@Iipgcotech.co n
Job No.104 292
Subject: Subsoil Study for Foundation Design and Percolation Testing, Proposed
Residence, Lot 360, River Valley Ranch Subdivision., Carbondale,
Colorado
Dear Mr. Kennedy
As requested, Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. performed a subsoil study for design
of foundations and percolation testing at the subject site. The study was conducted in
accordance with our agreement for geotechnical engineering services to Kennedy
Construction dated April 8, 2004. The data obtained and our recommendations based on
the proposed construction and subsurface conditions encountered are presented in this
report. We previously performed a geologic hazards and preliminary geotechnical stud
for the Gray Ranch development (now known as River Valley Ranch) dated Marcl, 27,
1995, Job No. 195 138. The area of this site was not included in the previous geologic
mapp!ng,
Proposed Construction: The proposed residence will be one story wood frame
construction above a crawlspace with a detached garage/ADU and located on the site as
shown on Figure 1. Garage floor will be slab -on -grade. A proposed pool and pond .will
be located on the south side of the residence. Cut depths are expected to range between
about 3 to 6 feet. Foundation loadings for this type of construction are assumed to be
relatively light and typical of the proposed type of construction. The septic area will be
located downhill and north of the residence.
If building conditions or foundation loadings are significantly different from those
described above, we should be notified to re-evaluate the recommendations presented in
this report.
Site Conditions: Lot 360 is a 35 wry. tract located above and west of the main }.art oldie
River Valley Ranch Subdivision. V gehlior consists of grass, weeds, sagebrush. j nioc:
Parker 303-841-7119 • Colorado Springs 719-633-5562 • Silverrhorne 970-468-1989
-2 -
and pinon trees. The ground surface in the building area is relatively flat with a moderate
slope down to the north.
Subsidence Potential: River Valley Ranch is underlain by Pennsylvania Age Eagle
Valley Evaporite bedrock. The evaporite contains gypsum deposits. Dissolution of the
gypsum under certain conditions can cause sinkholes to develop and can produce areas of
localized subsidence. During previous work in the area, a small sinkhole was mapped
about 800 feet west of this site in the River Valley Ranch Subdivision. Sinkholes were
not observed in the immediate area of the subject lot. The exploratory pits were relatively
shallow, for foundation design only and based on our present knowledge of the site, it
cannot be said for certain that sinkholes will not develop. In our opinion, the risk of
ground subsidence at Lot 360 is low and similar to other lots in the area but the owner
should be aware of the potential for sinkhole development.
Subsurface Conditions: The subsurface conditions at the site were evaluated by
excavating two exploratory pits in the building area at the approximate locations shown
on Figure 1. The logs of the pits are presented on Figure 2. The subsoils encountered,
below about one foot of topsoil, consist of 51/2 to 7'/2 feet of sandy silt and clay overlying
slightly silty sandy gravel with cobbles. Results of a gradation analysis performed on a
sample of sand and gravel (minus 3 inch fraction) obtained from the site are presented on
Figure 3. No free water was observed in the pits at the time of excavation and the soils
were slightly moist to moist. The laboratory testing is summarized on Table 1.
Foundation Recommendations: Considering the subsoil conditions encountered in the
exploratory pits and the nature of the proposed construction, we recommend spread
footings placed on the undisturbed natural granular soil designed for an allowable soil
bearing pressure of 2,500 psf for support of the proposed residence. The upper silt and
clay soils tend to compress after wetting and there could be some post -construction
foundation settlement. Footings should be extended down below the silt and clay to the
granular soils. The grade can be re-established with a properly compacted structural fill.
Footings should be a minimum width of 16 inches for continuous walls and 2 feet for
columns. Loose and disturbed soils encountered at the foundation bearing level within
the excavation should be removed and the footing bearing level extended down to the
undisturbed natural soils. Exterior footings should be provided with adequate cover
above their bearing elevations for frost protection. Placement of footings at least 36
inches below the exterior grade is typically used in this area. Continuous foundation
walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span local anomalies such as by assuming
an unsupported length of at least 10 feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining structures
Job No.104 292
-3 -
should be designed to resist a lateral earth pressure based on an equivalent fluid unit
weight of at least 50 pcf for the on-site soil as backfill.
Floor Slabs: The natural on-site soils, exclusive of topsoil, are suitable to support lightly
loaded slab -on -grade construction. To reduce the effects of some differential movement,
floor slabs should be separated from all bearing walls and columns with expansion joints
which allow unrestrained vertical movement. Floor slab control joints should be used to
reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking. The requirements for joint spacing and slab
reinforcement should be established by the designer based on experience and the intended
slab use. A minimum 4 inch layer of free -draining gravel should be placed beneath
basement level slabs to facilitate drainage. This material should consist of minus 2 inch
aggregate with less than 50% passing the No. 4 sieve and less than 2% passing the No.
200 sieve.
All fill materials for support of floor slabs should be compacted to at least 95% of
maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Required fill can
consist of the on-site soils devoid of vegetation, topsoil and oversized rock.
Underdrain System: Although free water was not encountered during our exploration, it
has been our experience in mountainous areas that local perched groundwater can develop
during times of heavy precipitation or seasonal runoff. Frozen ground during spring
runoff can create a perched condition. We recommend below -grade construction, such as
retaining walls and crawlspace areas, be protected from wetting and hydrostatic pressure
buildup by an underdrain system.
The drains should consist of drainpipe placed in the bottom of the wall backfill
surrounded above the invert level with free -draining granular material. The drain should
be placed at each level of excavation and at least I foot below lowest adjacent finish
grade and sloped at a minimum 1% to a suitable gravity outlet. Free -draining granular
material used in the underdrain system should contain less than 2% passing the No. 200
sieve, less than 50% passing the No. 4 sieve and have a maximum size of 2 inches. The
drain gravel backfill should be at least 1'/ feet deep.
Surface Drainage: The following drainage precautions should be observed during
construction and maintained at all times after the residence has been completed:
1) Inundation of the foundation excavations and underslab areas should be
avoided during construction.
2) Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and
compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density in
Job No.104 292
-4 -
pavement and slab areas and to at least 90% of the maximum standard
Proctor density in landscape areas. Free -draining wall backfill should be
capped with about 2 feet of the on-site, finer graded soils to reduce surface
water infiltration.
3) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be
sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions. We
recommend a minimum slope of 12 inches in the first 10 feet in unpaved
areas and a minimurn slope of 3 inches in the first 10 feet in pavement and
walkway areas.
4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all
backfill.
5) Landscaping which requires regular heavy irrigation should be located at
least 5 feet from the building. Consideration should be given to the use of
xeriscape to limit potential wetting of soils below the foundation caused by
irrigation.
Percolation Testing: Percolation tests were conducted on April 16, 2004 to evaluate the
feasibility of an infiltration septic disposal system at the site. One profile pit and thiec
percolation holes were dug at the locations shown on Fig. 1. The test holes (nominal 12
inch diameter by 12 inch deep) were hand dug at the bottom of shallow backhoe pits and
were soaked with water one day prior to testing. The soils exposed in the percolatioli
holes are similar to those exposed in the Profile Pit shown on Fig. 2 and consist of one
foot of topsoil and sandy silt and clay to 4 feet overlying sandy gravel with cobbles to 8
feet
The percolation test results are presented in Table 11 and average about 12 minutes per
inch. The percolation tests were conducted in the gravel soils below the upper silt and
clay soils. Based on the subsurface conditions encountered and the percolation test
results, the tested area should be suitable for a conventional infiltration septic disposal
system.
Limitations: This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted
geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no
warranty either express or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in
this report are based upon the data obtained from the exploratory pits excavated at the
locations indicated on Figure 1 and to the depths shown on Figure 2, the proposed type of
cons; ruction, and aur experience in the area. Our services do not include determining the
presence. prevention or possibility of mold or other biological contaminants (MOBC)
developing in the future. If the client is concerned about MOBC, then a professional in
lob tido. I04 292
-5 -
this special field of practice should be consulted. Our findings include interpolation and
extrapolation of the subsurface conditions identified at the exploratory pits and variations
in the subsurface conditions may not become evident until excavation is performed. If
conditions encountered during construction appear different from those described in this
report, we should be notified at once so re-evaluation of the recommendations may be
made.
This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes. We
are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. As the
project evolves, we should provide continued consultation and field services during
construction to review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations, and to
verify that the recommendations have been appropriately interpreted. Significant design
changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommendations
presented herein. We recommend on-site observation of excavations and foundation
bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a representative -of the geotechnical
engineer.
If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call our office.
Respectfully Submitted,
HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
Louis E. Eller
Reviewed by:
Daniel E. Hardin,
LEE/ksw
attachments Figure 1
Figure 2 — Lo "' oratory Pits and Percolation Test Holes
Figure 3 — Logs of Exploratory Pits
Figure 4 - Gradation Test Results
Table 1 — Summary of Laboratory Test Results
Table 2 -- Percolation Test Results
Job No.104 292
1
1
EXISTING
WATER
TANK
0
I
I
104 292
BUILDING2
ENVELOPE
/
1
HEPWORTH--PAINLAK
GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
VICINITY MAP
APPROXIMATE SCALE
1- = 300'
Figure 1
PROPOSED
POND
6470
-
6480
104 292
/
/
6470
/
f
/
/
P 2
A
P 1
A
ii
PROFILE
PIT
■
PIT 2
A
P 3
APPROXIMATE SCALE
1" = 60'
/ N
PIT 1
/
/
7
6490
HEPWORTH—PAWLAK
GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
i
C9PROPOSED
POOL
0
EXISTING
%ELL
i
/
/
•
/
BUILDING
ENVELOPE J
f
6480
1
LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY PITS AND
PERCOLATION TEST HOLES
Figure 2
.� 0
5
10
LEGEND:
r�r
PIT 1 PIT 2
Vt-6.4
-200=46
_ J
TOPSOIL: sandy silt and clay, organic, firm, brown.
PROFILE PIT
SILT AND CLAY (CL); sandy to very sandy, slightly gravelly, medium stiff. slightly moist
to moist, brown.
GRAVEL (GM); sandy, slightly silty to silty, dense, slightly moist. light brown.
2- Diameter hand driven liner sample.
Disturbed bulk sample.
0
5
10
NOTES:
1. Exploratory pits were excavated on April 15, 2004 with a backhoe_
2. Locations of exploratory pits were measured approximately by pacing from features shown on the
site plan provided.
3. Elevations of exploratory pits were not measured and the log of exploratory pits are drawn to depth.
4. The exploratory pit locations and elevations should be considered accurate only to the degree implied
by the method used.
5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory pit logs represent the approximate boundaries
between material types and transitions may be gradual.
6. No free water was encountered in the pits at the time of excavating. Fluctuation in water level
may occur with time.
7. Laboratory Testing Results:
WC = Water Content ( % )
+4 = Percent retained on the No. 4 sieve
—200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve
Depth — Feet
104 292
HEPWORTH—PAWLAK
GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
LOGS OF EXPLORATORY PITS
Figure 3
aXzisigUNIAIMIkl
24 NR
7 HR
0 45 MRN 15 IRI. 6016N. Isom 4 MRL 1 YIN.
NYOR0LIEIER ANALYSIS
TIME READINGS
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
1
SLEW ANALYSIS
U.S. STANDARD SERIES
00 /50 030 /16 /6 /'I 3/8'
CLEAR SOUARE OPENINGS
3/4'
1 1/r 3' 5' 6'
painiormi Amu
0411111p II A
111
i
11111
111 1
.001 .002 .005 002 .019 .037 .074 _130
104 292
GRAVEL 49
.300 .600
100
90
60
70
60
so
40
30
20
10
0
116 2.36 4.75 9.572512.0 37.5 76.2 12152 203
DIAMETER OF PARTICLES IN MILLIMETERS
LLAT TO SLLT
LIQUID LIMIT 7,
SAND
FINE 1 MEDIUM ICOARSE
SAND 42 %
GRAYEL
FINE
1
SILT AND CLAY 9
PLASTICITY INDEX 7.
COARSE
SAMPLE OF: Slightly Silty Sand and Gravel FROM: Pit 2 at 8 thru 9 Feet
HEPWORTH—PAWLAK
GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
GRADATION TEST RESULTS
COBBLES
• ► .S1Pde'
Figure 4
Job No. 104 292
cn
Z
QJ W
V_ cc
= liJ
H
hi
O
0 E
W
= L!')
SOIL OR
BEDROCK TYPE
Very Sandy Silt and Clay I
Gravelly Sandy Silt and
Clay
Slightly Silty Sand and
Gravel
1
UNCONFINED
COMPRESSIVE
STRENGTH
(PSF)
ATTERBERGLIMITS_
lD Q W •.•
Z c
an t
PERCENT
PASSING
NO. 200
SIEVE
Z
a
O
g
?I e::
(NI
NI
III
NATURAL
DRY
DENSITY
(Rcf)
gu E
zz
,1'.
CD
0•
z
I
V-
M E
n
in
rn
00
J
N
HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
TABLE 2
PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS
JOB NO. 104 292
HOLE NO.
HOLE DEPTH
(INO-IES)
LENGTH OF
INTERVAL
(MIN)
WATER
DEPTH AT
START OF
INTERVAL
(INCHES)
WATER
DEPTH AT
END OF
INTERVAL
(INCHES)
DROP IN
WATER
LEVEL
(INCHES)
AVERAGE
PERCOLATION
RATE
(MIN./INCH)
P-1
44
15
Water added
10
8 1/2
1 1/2
8 1/2
7 1/2
1
10 1/4
9 1/4
1
16
9 1/4
8 1/4
1
8 1/4
7 1/4
1
7 1/4
6 1/2
3/4
6 1/2
5 1/2
1
5 1/2
_ 4 1/2
1
P-2
48
15
Water added
Water added
9 1/2
6 1/2
3
8
61/2
41/2
2
10
8
2
8
6
2
6
4
2
7 1/2
5 1/2
2
5 1/2
3 1/2
2
3 112
2
1 1/2
P-3
48
15
Water added
11
9 1/2
1 1/2
13
9 1/2
8
1 1/2
8
7
1
7
6
1
10 1/2
9 1/4_
1 1/4
9 1/4
8
1 1/4
8
6 3/4
1 1/4
6 3/4
5 3/4
1
Note: Percolation test holes were hand dug in the bottom of backhoe pits and soaked on April
15, 2004. Percolation tests were conducted on April 16, 2004. The average percolation
rates were based on the last three readings of each test.
PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST
Applicant Date
Building
En 'veered Foundation
yDriv ay Permit
urveyed Site Plan
Septic Permit and Setbacksfget
-Grde/Topography 30%
✓ Attach Residential Plan Review List
Minimum Application Questionnaire
t.A Subdivision Plat Notes
,QJ. Fire Department Review
Valuation Determination/Fees
Red Line Plans/Stamps/Sticker
Attach Conditions
Application Signed
Plan Reviewer To Sign Application
Water and Sewer
Parcel/Schedule No.
40# Snowload Letter- Manf. Hms.
GENERAL NOTES:
Planning/Zoning
Property Line Setbacks
30ft Stream Setbacks
Flood Plain
Building Height
Zoning Sign -off
Road Impact Fees
HOA/DRC Approval
Grade/Topography 40%
Planning Issues
Subdivision Plat Notes
Jul 28 04 01:52p District 1
d
970-945-1318 p.1
Garfield County
Road and Bridge, District 1
7300 Hwy 82, Gleewood springs, CO 81601
970-945-1223 ph. 945-1318 FAX
Date: 07-28-04
To: Building & Planning
From: Bobby Branham
Re: Driveway permit exemption
For: Wing Holdings
4011 Crystal Bridge Dr.
Carbondale CO 81623
Location: Same
Contractor: Steve Kennedy
Kennedy Construction
Ph. 963-5572
Scope of Work: Obtain building permit
Road and Bridge Concerns: This property lies outside the system of maintained county
roads, and is therefore exempt from County driveway permit requirements.
ag__2____
Bobby Branham
Dist.1 Road and Bridge
tech
HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL
September 17, 2004
Kennedy Construction
Attn: Steve Kennedy
0233 Homeplace
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601
Hepworth-Pawlak Geocechnical, Inc
5020 Count% Road 154
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601
Phone: 970-945-7988
Fax: 970-945-8454
email hpgeoehpgeorech corn
Job No. 104 292
Subject: Observation of Excavation, Proposed Residence, Lot 360, 4011 Crystal
Bridge Drive, River Valley Ranch Subdivision, Carbondale, Colorado
Dear Mr. Kennedy:
As requested, a repmentative of Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. observed the
excavation at the subject site on September 17, 2004 to evaluate the soils exposed for
foundation support. The findings of our observations and recommendations for the
foundation design ate presented in this report. We previously conducted a subsoil study
for design of foundations at the site and presented our findings in a report dated April 30.
2004, Job No. 104 292.
At the time of our visit to the site, the foundation excavation had been cut in two levels
from 3 1/2 to 12 feet below the adjacent ground surface. The soils exposed in the bottom
of the excavation consisted of silty sandy gravel with cobbles. Some loose material was
observed in the excavation base. No free water was encountered in the excavation and the
soils were slightly moist to moist.
The soil conditions exposed in the excavation are consistent with those previously
encountered on the site and suitable for support of spread footings designed for the
recommended allowable bearing pressure of 2,500 psf. The loose and disturbed soils
should be removed in the footing areas to expose the undisturbed natural soils or
moistened and compacted prior to concrete placement. Other recommendations presented
in our previous report which are applicable should also be observed.
The recommendations submitted in this letter are based on our observation of the soils
exposed within the foundation excavation and the previous limited subsurface exploration
at the site. Variation:3 in the subsurface conditions below the excavation could increase
the risk of foundation movement. We should be advised o f any variations encountered in
Parker 303-841-7119 • Colorado Springs 719-633-5562 • Silverthome 970-468-1989
Kennedy Construction
September 17. 2004
Page 2
the excavation conditions for possible changes to recommendations contained in this
letter. Our services do not include determining the presence, prevention or possibility of
mold or other biological contaminants (MOBC) developing in the future. If the client is
concerned about MOI3C, then a professional in this special field of practice should be
consulted.
If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call our office.
Sincerely,
HEPWORTH — PAWLAK GEOTCHNICAL, INC.
Louts E. Eller
Reviewed by:
N°
g
GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND SANITATION DEPARTMENT Permit
109 8th Street Suite 303
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601
Phone (303) 945.8212
INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL PERMIT
PROPERTY
Owner's Name W 111
System Location
Present Address
Assessor's Parcel No.
This does not constitute
a budding or use permit.
C_'(igt_ 579- cica4
LIQ craT- D7 96)
Legal Description of Assessor's arcel No
SYSTEM DESIGN
Septic Tank Capacity (gallon) Other
Percolation Rate (minutes/inch) Number of Bedrooms (or other)
Required Absorption Area - See Attached
Special Setback Requirements:
Date Inspector
FINAL SYSTEM INSPECTION AND APPROVAL (as installed)
Call for Inspection (24 hours notice) Before Covering Installation
System Installer
Septic Tank Capacity
Septic Tank Manufacturer or Trade Name
Septic Tank Access within 8" of surface
Absorption Area
Absorption Area Type and/or Manufacturer or Trade Name
Adequate compliance with County and State regulations/requirements
Other
Date Inspector
*CONDITIONS:
9A 7/o ci izrFP----ger*746
RETAIN WITH RECEIPT RECORDS AT CONSTRUCTION SITE
1. All installation must comply with all requirements of the Colorado State Board of Health Individual Sewage Disposal Systems Chapt
25, Article 10 C.R.S. 1973, Revised 1984,
2. This permit is valid only for connection to structures which have fully complied with County zoning and building requirements. Con-
nection to or use with any dwelling or structures not approved by the Building and Zoning office shall automatically be aviolation or a
requirement of the permit and cause for both legal action and revocation of the permit.
3. Any person who constructs, alters, or installs an individual sewage disposal system in a manner which involves a knowing and material
variation from the terms or specifications contained in the application of permit commits a Class I, Petty Offense ($500.00 fine — 6
months in jail or both).
White - APPLICANT Yellow - DEPARTMENT
No. 9:%kiLDJ" ` et
0321 J 1 01au44.#cunTZAti.
UIL IMO PERMIT CA
Job Addres
Owner
Contractor
Assessor's Parcel Nc 173 041(k j
Date Q
S tbacks: Front
Co ils Test
Footing `/ - -(.74-er424+
Foundation /c' L! zzr'R-/1011/-
Grout
Underground Plumbing
Rough Plumbing 6-/7
Framing *1°7--1-4.75
Insulation 7-- n.5-7)4—
Roofing A,
Drywall f 7 -25---or
Gas Piping %-1?
7r �
Address s .. j1 s_ _ __ i` ' one #
'-'JPhone # la -T-(07%
Address J 2
Rear
GOA-.
GoiiL : 5/C/(
RH LH Zoning
INSPECTIONS
Weatherproofing
Mechanical
Electrical Rough (State) s/
Electrical Final (S te)
Final -2-t-e, ecklist Cos .leted? 11
Certificate Occupancy r
Date a/ 1
Septic System # `2
Date s _ 7_OY
Final
Other
NOTES
rimae 7-44x'5
(continue on back)
i
INSPECTION WILL NOT BE MADE UNLESS
THIS CARD IS POSTED ON THE JOB
24 HOURS NOTICE REQUIRED FOR INSPECTIONS
i
BUILDING PERMIT
GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO
Date lssued . CI7..Zoned Area Permit No
AGREEMENT
In consideration of the issuance of this permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with all
Taws and regulations related to the zoning, location; construction and erection of the proposed
structure for which this permit is granted, and further agrees that if the above said regulations
are not fully complied with in the zoning, location, erection and construction of the above
described structure, the permit may then be revoked by notice from the County CountOuilding
Inspector and IMMEDIATELY BECOME NULL AND VOID. "
useVreinC Lift) icieck7
Address or Legalripti
Owner oaf ply.
Setbacks Front
Side
Side
Rea
This Card Must Be Posted So It is Plainly Visible From The Street Until Final Inspection.
INSPECTION RECORD
Footing /y r_2 • ,ice
Foundation /:110. • C' • ' _c- D -til-ay'
Underground Plumbing
Insulation _. 41,111.11
Rough Plumbing 4O -11-v , ,
Drywall -2.3•.--0 . _
Chimney & Vent
Electric Final (by State Inspector) I, 41:14joj
Gas Piping (p-1 -0 i , I
Final /4-21-ur
Electric Rough (By State Inspector EINE
I ptic Final K _ !- _ '/
Framing "%- I '
(To include Roof in place and Windows
and Doors installed).
otes: p L4'6 3a O
5•`^"{`.''" r -,-.r AYH/ ^'.ocis—
ALL LISTED ITEMS MUST BE INSPECTED
WHETHER INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR
AND APPROVED BEFORE COVERING -
UNDERGROUND OR ABOVE GROUND.
THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE
Phone 384-5003 109 8th Street County Courthouse Gknwood Springs, Colorado.
APP - • VEDDO NOT DESTROY THIS CARD
Date,*
By i ,u
I PLACED OUTSID - COVER WITH CLEAR PLASTIC