Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Application- Permit
Garfield County Building & Sanitation Department 108 8t Street, Suite #201 Glenwood Springs, Co. 81601 LO} '46 Office- 945-8212 Inspection Line- 384-5003 \o.\) b23 apt NO. Cka, (� Job Address0031 An Nature of Work Building Permit (94CJfl - Use ofBuilding tj nt4-4 la -)f- CD J�-12-4C"��r73 L_ J`j Owner QCSL OFY1 Q% Contractor Ct�C\ 12_r— Amount r Amount of Permit S 1 Ct 1 l �1 EXTERIOR Address No 1/ Drainage Decks -support & clearance to wood Decks -stein & rails Extenor locks ✓ Flashing around doors & windows ✓ / Insect screens 1/ N✓ -"'-- INTERIOR GARAGE Fire wall separation Service doors -114" min Door (20 min.) w/auto closer -1W min. Mach. equip. 18" above floor 44✓ No opening into sleeping arta BASEMENT -CRAWL AREA Access Insulation HeadrooMStaes Ventilation 2 Date '�-�� Clerk FINAL CHECKLIST MECHANICAL ROOM Balky Hol water �1 �' /� F A gasfoil Y1^+4'' ^ -T avv„, Floor dram ✓ Clearance ✓ Air con system _y Hot water heater ' O Combustion air ✓ Gas piping valves ✓ LPG Drain FIREPLACE/STOVE Clearance to combustibles Termination of chimney Combustion air Hearth (12" or 20" on sides) Glass doors Certified byr (Nt/ REMARKS STAIRWAYS Headroom (6'6") Railing Si guardrails Width Rise & run KITCHEN Clearance above gull Exhaust fan Broiler exhaust (t hr. chase) ✓ BEDROOMS Egress Smoke detector BATHROOMS Exhaust fan ✓ Shatterproof glass OTHER *ca GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION 108 r Street, Suite 201, Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: 970-945-82121 Far: 970-384-3470 / Inspection Line: 970-3842�oogq3 Lo - [y Parcel/Schedule No: 240Lam�1� 1 - (li I — o a- / 1 Permit No: 4110 AGREEMENT PERMISSION LS HEREBY GRANTED TO THE/PPUCANT AS OWNER, CONTRACTOR AND/OR THE AGENT OF THE CONTRACTOR OR OWNER TO CONSTRUCT THE STRUCTURE AS DETAILED ON PLANS (7411 SPECIFICATIONS SUBMITTED TO AND REVIEWED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. IN CONSIDERATION OF THE ISSS•UANCE OF THIS PERMIT, THE SIGNER. HEREBY AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL BUILDING CODES AND LAND USE REGULATIONS ADOPTED BY GARFIELD COUNTY PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GIVEN IN 3025201 CRS AS AMENDED. THE SIGNER FURTHER AGREES THAT IF THE ABOVE SAID ORDINANCES ARE NOT FULLY COMPILED WITH IN THE LCOATION, ERECTION, CONSTRUCTION, AND USE OF TILE ABOVE DESCRIBED STRUCTURE, THE PERMIT MAY BE REVOKED BY NOTICE FROM THE COUNTY AND THAT THEN AND THERE IT SHALL BECOME NULL AND VOID. THE ISSUANCE OFA PERMIT BASED UPON PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA SHALL NOT PREVENT THE BUILDING OFFICIAL FROM THEREAFTER REQUIRING THE CORRECTION OF ERRORS IN SAID PIANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA OR FROM PREVENTING BUILDING OPERATION BEING CARRIED ON THEREUNDER WHEN IN VIOLATION OF ITIS CODE OR MW OTHER ORDINANCE OR REGULATION OF THIS JURISDICTION. THE REVIEW OF SUBMITTED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND INSPECTIONS CONDUCTED THEREAFTER DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ACCEPTANCE OF ANY RESPONSIBILrnES OR LIABLITIIS BY GARFIELD COUNTY FOR ERRORS, OMISSIONS OR DISCREPENCIES. THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THESE ITEMS AND IMPLEMENTATION DURING CONSTRUCTION RESTS SPECIFICIALLY WITH THE ARTICTECT, DESIGNER, BUILDER, AND OWNER. COMMENTS ARE INTENDED TO BE CONSERVATIVE AND IN SUPPORT OF THE OWNERS INTEREST. Garfam.003 ( ///� I H BY AKN 9yLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE AGREEMENT ABOVE (INITIAL): 1r/.L cot n So 3 ,tem rn Job Address: Se S Q ei LCGki Cl rCl c to- Pi t .h ) 1 Lot No: lock No: 4(P BL Uni-It 1- Lc Sub / E= p n: ,4E4' V e& '318Pr►h51oMs •. . 2 O r: iQAC,f 6.614.-e dr (o�Ausi.fGer %S co h: Eio . as n • S55.5 Wk Ph: crann-e_. 3 ontnetor: n _ p Leer: a yt eJ A Ness: �j e µ Ph: eJ Lie. No. 4 �rchi�teLM/E LiPirtGyk gunniesk Address:, 1417 a i.OAAL 44o • a44 • 19 o's Llc. No. 5 Sq. FL o�BuOd g: Q-7to 4-• d J t. of Lot: 1 e 1 Height 34I _ / Is �/)-MI'�• -la No. of Floor: Z 6 Use of 6 -pint multi_ bra .,n,,a41 Au tut vlsi 7 Describe Work: 1 hat) 8 Class of Work: flew o Alteration o Remove o Addition o Move 9 10 Garage: 4..eliigle o Double Carport: o Single o Double o Driveway Permit ❑ On -Site Sewage Disposal o Site Plan (Septic) 11 Valuation of Work: S Atop, ODo• Adjusted Valuations: S 1 652, 12 Special Conditions: siP-i. nal ' 22 7L..1'T /JDTIS ii' Sni4..41.rg atizt.TA p A SEPARATE ELECTRICAL ISSUED BY THE STATE THIS PERMIT BECOMES AUTHORIZED IS NOT CONSTRUCTION OR WORK PERIOD OF TE0 DAYS I HEREBY CERTIFY APPLICATION AND KNOW OF LAWS COMPLETED WITHIN GRANTING OF A PERMIT TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL LOCAL LAW REGULATING OF • • NSTRUCTION. ic NOTICE PERMIT IS REQUIRED OF COLORADO. NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR COMMENCED WITHIN 110 DAYS, IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK ISCOMMENCED. THAT I HAVE READ AND THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN DOES NOT PRESUME TO THE PROVISIONS OF MW CONSTRUCTION OR THE ' AND MUST BE CONSTRUCTION OR, IF FOR A EXAMINED THIS CORRECT. ALL WELL BE OR NOT. THE LIVE AUTHORITY OTHER STATE OR PERFORMANCE 4 Plan Check Fee: •� / `,57 2 / Permit Fee: 34.854540 . Totall Fee: Dated Per mit Issued: /0 /094 OC / Group:: Const.Type: f • 7�r�"/-#11/-#11PROVISIONS zoning: Setbacks: Ili yatit. ISDS No. & Fee: ieel-_ -.. it'iOler7 t' <724,. 35 =N358./O S NA ,i N. ill b 4 —:. 7401 'APPRO ,i// • 1 E 44, L 'I� AGREEMENT PERMISSION LS HEREBY GRANTED TO THE/PPUCANT AS OWNER, CONTRACTOR AND/OR THE AGENT OF THE CONTRACTOR OR OWNER TO CONSTRUCT THE STRUCTURE AS DETAILED ON PLANS (7411 SPECIFICATIONS SUBMITTED TO AND REVIEWED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. IN CONSIDERATION OF THE ISSS•UANCE OF THIS PERMIT, THE SIGNER. HEREBY AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL BUILDING CODES AND LAND USE REGULATIONS ADOPTED BY GARFIELD COUNTY PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GIVEN IN 3025201 CRS AS AMENDED. THE SIGNER FURTHER AGREES THAT IF THE ABOVE SAID ORDINANCES ARE NOT FULLY COMPILED WITH IN THE LCOATION, ERECTION, CONSTRUCTION, AND USE OF TILE ABOVE DESCRIBED STRUCTURE, THE PERMIT MAY BE REVOKED BY NOTICE FROM THE COUNTY AND THAT THEN AND THERE IT SHALL BECOME NULL AND VOID. THE ISSUANCE OFA PERMIT BASED UPON PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA SHALL NOT PREVENT THE BUILDING OFFICIAL FROM THEREAFTER REQUIRING THE CORRECTION OF ERRORS IN SAID PIANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA OR FROM PREVENTING BUILDING OPERATION BEING CARRIED ON THEREUNDER WHEN IN VIOLATION OF ITIS CODE OR MW OTHER ORDINANCE OR REGULATION OF THIS JURISDICTION. THE REVIEW OF SUBMITTED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND INSPECTIONS CONDUCTED THEREAFTER DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ACCEPTANCE OF ANY RESPONSIBILrnES OR LIABLITIIS BY GARFIELD COUNTY FOR ERRORS, OMISSIONS OR DISCREPENCIES. THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THESE ITEMS AND IMPLEMENTATION DURING CONSTRUCTION RESTS SPECIFICIALLY WITH THE ARTICTECT, DESIGNER, BUILDER, AND OWNER. COMMENTS ARE INTENDED TO BE CONSERVATIVE AND IN SUPPORT OF THE OWNERS INTEREST. Garfam.003 ( ///� I H BY AKN 9yLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE AGREEMENT ABOVE (INITIAL): 1r/.L cot n So 3 ,tem rn The following items are required by Garfield County for a final inspection: 1. A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector 2. Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department posted where readily visible from access road; 3. A finished roof, a lockable house, complete exterior siding, exterior doors and windows installed, a complete kitchen with cabinets, a sink with hot & cold running water, non- absorbent kitchen floor coverings, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove and refrigerator, all necessary plumbing; 4. A complete bathroom, with washbowl, tub or shower, toilet stool, hot and cold running water, non-absorbent floors and walls finished and a privacy door; 5. All steps outside or inside over three (3) steps must have handrails, guard rails on balconies or decks over 30" high constructed to all 1997 UBC requirements; 6. Outside grading done to where water will detour away from the building; 7. Exceptions to the outside steps, decks and grading may be made upon the demonstration of extenuating circumstances, i.e. weather, but a Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until all the required items are completed and a final inspection made. A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. ****CANNOTOCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (C.O.) IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATING PREMISE UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET. I understand and agree to abide by the above conditions for occupancy, use and the issuance of a Certificate of Occupanpermit# the dwelling under building Signature .i Date' BpcontO82002 Applicant Address Date 7- VALUATION/FEE DETERMINATION Finished (Livable Area): Main Upper Lower Other Total Square Feet Valuation Basement: Unfinished Conversion of Unfinished to Finished Plan Check Fee for Conversion Valuation Garage: Crawl Space: Valuation Valuation Decks/Patios: Covered Valuation Open Valuation Total Valuation Subdivision [kitty (hjeAA) Sino''. Lot/Block Loi- t f Un f —(0J 1 ContractOrw r B nit L ©033 Arran o3 5 f \ .. o63-1 t1 f lgp c lam. . _frt T4s 2.42. - L - 55 5.s -- 0nit .2: 003i 4nc e ko Circle 1E44 -al: o033 4fr1jelice. Circles -p035 Anselica Circ(, u sH . 0637 Aft ;cooCiecl2_. u,il'rs__ 0031 c c. Uca l,(no- : ooc(( kP$,lica C',rck - - - 7.507 x b9- IS11i61._._ 7-.& P /8 = ,i45 - — 5S-z.� Garfield County - Minimum Application Required: Commercial and Multi -Family Page 1 of 7 eGarfield County, Colorado Search... HOME AROUT GAFFIELD COUNTY COUNTY SERVICES I COUNTY GOVERNANCE COUNTY DEPAR Accounting Administration Airport Assessor Board of Commissioners Building & Planning ► Boards, Meetings & Agendas ► FAQ ► Comprehensive Plan of 2000 • Forms • Building Forms ► Code Violation Report Form ► Driveway Permit Application ► ISDS Application • Minimum Application Required: Commercial and Multi -Family ► Minimum Application Required: Manufactured Homes Minimum Application Required: SF Construction ► Owner's Agreement to Build Garage ► Sign Permit ► Planning Forms ► Land Use Code Updates 1 Building Code Forms P Code Enforcement ► Agricultural Buildings Defined 1 Recreation Cabin Defined County Departments - Building 8 Planning • Forms • Building Forms - Minimum Application Required: Comm Multi -Family MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIRED: COMMERCIAL AND MULTI -FAMILY GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING 970-945-8212 MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF COMMERCIAL OR MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS including NEW CONSTRUCTION ADDITIONS ALTERATIONS and MOVED BUILDINGS In order to understand the scope of the work intended under a permit application and expec issuance of a permit it is important that complete information be provided.Adequate and cor information will prevent delays in the plan review process.Reviewing a plan and the discove required information has not been provided by the applicant may result in the delay of the p issuance and in proceeding with building construction.The owner or contractor may be requ provide this information before the plan review may proceed.This causes delays because 01 that are in line for review may be given attention before the new information may be review( has been provided to the Building Department. Please review this document to determine if you have enough information to design project and provide adequate information to facilitate a plan review.lf you do not, it m helpful to obtain a book titled "Dwelling Construction Under the Uniform Building Co. book is available to you through this department at our cost.Also, please consider u: design professional for assistance in your design and a construction professional foi construction of your project. To provide for a more understandable plan in order to determine compliance with the buildii plumbing and mechanical codes, applicants are requested to review the following checklist httn-//www Barfield-countv com/home/index aso7Daee=690 3/4/2004 Garfield County - Minimum Application Required: Commercial and Multi -Family Page 2 of 7 ► Demographics ► Consumer Price Index ► Geographic Information Services ► Zoning and Subdivision Regulations Clerk and Recorder Community Corrections County Engineer Geographic Information Services Human Resources Information Technology Landfill Oil and Gas Liaison Public Health Road and Bridge Sheriff Social Services Treasurer Vegetation Management Purchasing and during design. Plans to be included for a Building Permit must be on draft paper at least 18"x 24"" a to scale. Plans must include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations all sides decks, balcony steps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the finish gr; section showing in detail, from the bottom of the footing to the top of the roof, including re -b. bolts, pressure treated plates, floor joists, wall studs and spacing, insulation, sheeting, hous (which is required), siding or any approved building material. A window schedule.A door schedule. A floor framing plan, a roofing framing plan, roof must be designed to withstand a 40 pound square foot. up to 7,000 feet in elevation, an 80 M.P.H. windshear, wind exposure B, windla pounds per square foot and a 36 inch frost depth. All sheets to be identified by number and indexed.All oI the above requirements must be m( plans will be retumed. All plans submitted must be incompliance with the 1997 UBC, UMC and 1997 UPC. Applicants are required to indicate appropriately and to submit completed checklist E application for a permit: 1.1s a site plan included that identifies the location of the proposed structure, additions or of buildings, setback easements, and utility easements showing distances to the property line: each comer of the proposed structure prepared by a licensed surveyor and has the surveyc signature and professional stamp on the drawing?Slopes of 30% or more on properties mu; show on site plan. NOTE: 106.3.1 (7.)Any site plan for the placement of any portion of a stn within 50 ft. of a property line and not within a previously surveyed building envelope on a s final plat shall be prepared by a licensed surveyor and have the surveyors signature and pr( stamp on the drawing.Any structure to be built within a building envelope of a lot shown on recorded subdivision plat, shall include a copy of the building envelope as it is shown on the with the proposed structure located within the envelope. Yes 2.Does the site plan when applicable include the location of the I.S.D.S. (Individual Sewage System) and distances to the property lines, wells (on subject property and adjacent proper streams or water courses?This information must be certified by a licensed surveyor with the signature and professional stamp on the design. Yes "'No Not necessary for this project 3.Are the plans submitted for application review construction drawings and not drawings I stamped or marked identifying them as "Not for construction, for permit issuance only', "Apt drawings only', 'For permit issuance only" or similar language? Yes / No Not necessary for this project 4.1s the I.S.D.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System) designed, stamped and signed by a r Registered Engineer? Yes /No Not necessary for this project 5.Does the site plan indicate the location and direction of the State, County or private road the property? ,...,-aero ,.'.,nt'rnetrya."...,e/irtAav orn7nc.no—A011 3/4/7004 Garfield County - Minimum Application Required: Commercial and Multi -Family Page 3 of 7 Yes 6.Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all reinf steel in accordance with the uniform building code or per stamped engineered design? Yes / No Not necessary for this project 7.If the building is a pre-engineered structure, is there a stamped, signed engineered found for this building? Yes ✓ No Not necessary for this project 8.Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl sp. the clearances required between wood and earth? Yes /' No Not necessary for project 9.Do the plans indicate the size and location of the ventilation openings for the attic, root jot and soffits? Yes / No Not necessary for this project 10.Do the plans include design Toads as required under the Uniform Building Code tor root snowloads, (a minimum of 40 pounds per square toot in Garfield County)? Yes / No Not necessary for this project 11.Do the plans include design loads as required for floor loads under the Uniform Building Chapter 16 and Tables 16A, 16B and 16C? Yes /No Not necessary for this project 12.Does the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor, and ro construction? Yes "No _Not necessary for this project 13.1s the wind speed and exposure design included in the plan? Yes No Not necessary for this project 14.Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists, wall studs, ceil roof rafters or joists or trusses? Yes ✓ No Not necessary for this project 15.Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method of positive connect( columns and beams? Yes / No Not necessary for this project 16.Does the plan indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the highest pr building or addition measured at mid span between the ridge and the eave down to existing contours? httn•//rnww oa rl.I-rnnnry rnm/hnme/inclex acn9naee=6 3/4/2004 Garfield County - Minimum Application Required: Commercial and Multi -Family Page 4 of 7 Yes ✓ No Not necessary for this project 17.Does the plan include any stove or zero clearance fireplace planned for installation inclu. make and model and Colorado Phase 11 certifications or Phase 11 EPA certification? Yes No Not necessary for this project '✓ 18.Does the plan include a masonry fireplace including a fireplace section indicating design comply with the Uniform Building Code Chapter 31? Yes No Not necessary for this project ✓ 19.Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that egress/rescue windov sleeping rooms and/or basements comply with the requirements of the Uniform Building Co Yes ✓ No Not necessary for this project 20.Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that windows provide natu and ventilation for all habitable rooms? Yes 1/ No Not necessary for this project 21.Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass door immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as a wa surface; sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub enclosures and speci glazing for these areas? Yes 1/ No Not necessary for this project 22.Do the plans include a complete design for all mechanical systems planned for installatic building? Yes 7 No Not necessary for this project 23.Have all areas in the building been accurately identified for the intended use?(Occupanc identified in the Uniform Building Code Table 5-A) Yes "No Not necessary for this project 24.Does the plan indicate the quantify, form, use and storage of any hazardous materials th in use in this building? Yes / No Not necessary for this project 25.1s the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas fumaces, boilers and water heaters on the plan? Yes / No Not necessary for this project 26.Do the plans indicate the location and dimension of restroom facilities and if more than h employees and both sexes are employed, facilities for both sexes? Yes /No Not necessary for this project 27.Do the plans indicate that restrooms and access to the building are handicapped access httn•//www Barfield-countv corn/home/index aso9oaee=690 3/4/2004 Garfield County - Minimum Application Required: Commercial and Multi -Family Page 5 of 7 Yes / No Not necessary for this project 28.Have two (2) complete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the applicator Yes /1 No 29.Have you designed or had This plan designed while considering building and other const code requirements? Yes v/ No Not necessary for this project 30.Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a fir inspection by the Garfield County Building Department? Yes / No 31.Do your plans comply with all zoning rules and regulations in the County related to your . district?For comer lots see supplemental section 5.05.03 in the Garfield County Zoning Res setbacks. Yes ✓ No 32.Do you understand that approval for design and/or construction changes are required pr implementation of these changes? Yes 7No 33.Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a 'Plan Review" fee from yoc time of application and that you will be required to pay the "Permit" fee as well as any "Sept System" or "Road Impact' fees required, at the time you pick up your building permit? Yes /No 34.Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the Unifonr Code including approval on a final inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy r occupancy of the building? Yes No 35.Are you aware that the Permit Application must be signed by the Owner or a written autf given for an Agent and that the party responsible for the project must comply with the Unifoi Codes? Yes No 36.Are you aware that twenty-four (24) hour notice is required for all inspections?Inst will be made from Battlement Mesa to West Glenwood in the mornings and from Gler Springs to Carbondale, in the afternoon.All inspections must be called in by 3:30 p.m before.Failure to give twenty-four (24) hour notice for inspections will delay your insr one (1) day.lnspections are to be called in to 384-5003. 37.Are you aware that requesting inspections on work that is not ready or not accessible in a $47.00 yerinspection fee? Yes 38.Are you aware that prior to issuance of a building permit you are required to show proof 6rrn // oorf aIrl ..n,,,rr., .-..,,,n,nr.,o/;..An.. oerr9mo ern —A0f1 1/d/9fY1d Garfield County - Minimum Application Required: Commercial and Multi -Family Page 6 of 7 driveway access permit or obtain a statement from the Garfield County Road 8 Bridge Dep; stating one is not necessary?You can contact the Road 8 Bridge Department at 625-8601. Yes / No 39.Do you understand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed Electric Plumber to perform installations and hookups?The license number will be required at lime c inspection. Yes No 40.Are you aware, that on the front of the building permit application you will need to till in tt Schedule Number for the lot you are applying for this permit on prior to submittal of the buik perrnit application?Your attention in this is appreciated. / Yes No I hereby acknowledge That 1 have read, understand, and answered these questions to the b ability. vn. 7 SignatureDate 5/p¢ 97C' Cls • Phone: 5---5-5& (days): ' — Project Name: &Ci�e)/�/"�, _ c ) Project Address: g ! 4-1,409 . 21141`- w Note: If you answered No on any of these questions you may be required to provide this informe- the request of the Building Official prior to beginning the plan review process.Delays in issui permit are to be expected.Work may not proceed without the issuance of the permit. *If you have answered "Not necessary for this project' on any of the questions and it is dete the Building Official that the information is necessary to review the application and plans to minimum compliance with the adopted codes, please expect the following: A.The application may be placed behind more recent applications for building permits in the process and not reviewed until required information has been provided and the application i again to first position for review. B.Delay in issuance of the permit. C.Delay in proceeding with construction. 'If you answered "No' to this question the circumstances described in the question could re "Stop Work Order" being issued or a'Certificate of Occupancy not being issued. Bpcomm 04/2003 Home 1 About Garfield County 1 County Services 1 County Governance 1 County Departments 1 News 1 Quick Index 1 Site Map Lu U 1' 11 • /1, r A 9......e -AO -I 2/A/l(Yld Applican PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST 7 $� X70 Building ✓ngineered Foundation /E v Driveway Permit Surveyed Site Plan Septic Permit and Setbacks `-7Grade/Topography 30% /Attach Residential Plan Review List .�viinimum Application Questionnaire ✓Subdivision Plat Notes ✓Fire Department Review Valuation Determination/Fees /Red Line Plans/Stamps/Sticker Attach Conditions —application Signed Plan Reviewer To Sign Application Parcel/Schedule No. ✓d0# Snowload Letter- Manf. Hms. GENERAL NOTES: Date Planning/Zoning Property Line Setbacks 30ft Stream Setbacks Flood Plain Building Height Zoning Sign -off Road Impact Fees ✓ HOA/DRC Approval Grade/Topography 40% Planning Issues Subdivision Plat Notes 03/26/2005 NON 7:50 PAX 9705230103 GRACE HONES AccuStar Labs ®001/004 Page 1 of 1 Questions About Your Test Kit Results? Contact your tical radon more®entalhoe•rgw. Need to oder more test Idts? Go to our radon shoo now. > Test Results WARS 3pes OwRloire s'�ttYi� Below we the reads of your Radon Test TestAdbees 0031 MgYwCide Test Location Fist Floor Serial Number 250893 Result < 0.4 pC1IL Interpretation Your radon in air test result Is below he EPA's recarrrrrended action level. Comments Get Results for another Radon Test lUt Enter Your Radon Test Kit Segal Number 1250693 • Print These Reslfs Canal kik Aw6ta Labs is not responsible for the consequences of any action taken or not taken based rq reported or any verbal or written Interpretation of the resits. AsaGter th MI Rights Reserved email IMO®appptagabs.tom htlp://www.accustarlabs.comttealtesults reply.pbp 03/28/2005 Mar 23 05 07:34a p.3 lis Pale Itaginering card Caaamrl a& is a I.a!H,rI 4n Pet C.r.r koa.aaa R (IA)ine.. PaStippippeses Andy Schwaller Garfield County Building Department Fax: 970-384-3470 3-23-05 RE: Grace Homes Valley View Battlement, Mesa, 6-Plex at 0031 thio 0041 Angelica Circle. Building Department 1 I have been retained by Grace Homes to provide engineering services for the above referenced project. I have supervised inspection of the foundations prior to concrete placement to ensue conform with the drawings that I prepared and were submitted for permit. I also verified placement of the foundation insulation materiaL The foundations are structurally adequate to satisfy the building codes currently adopted by Garfield County. Please contact me if there are any questions concerning this project. Signed, Darren It Adams, P. E. 285--9'0 So Andy, Grace Homes (Darter LLC) has paid all tap fees for the following addresses: Single Family Units: 15 Cliff View Place 26 Cliff View Place 35 Cliff View Place 255 Cliff View Circle 37, 39, & 41 Angelica Circle Four-Plex: 111, 113, 117, & 119 Angelica Circle Water and sewer has been approved, and meters set for the following properties: 255 Cliff View Circle, 31, 33, 35, 37, 39, & 41 Angelica Circle 111, 113, 117, & 119 Angelica Circle Thanks Andy, Arnie 0 U 44C 7. lG h stisq+l,to ? :age.ot Andy Schwaller From: David Blair, Chief, Grand Valley Fire Protection Dist. [gvfpd@sopris.net] Sent: Friday, July 30, 2004 3:44 PM To: Andy Schwaller Subject: Re: VVV & Grace Homes, conditional approval Andy, All fire hydrants are in, they have been randomly tested and approved. You may issue permits for construction along Angelica Circle or Valley View Drive, but no where else. David A. Blair Fire Chief, GVFPD --- Original Message --- From: Andy Schwaller To: David Blair Chief, Grand Valley Fire Protection Dist. Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2004 4:23 PM Subject: RE: VVV & Grace Homes, conditional approval Works for me. Thanks Andy Schwaller Building Official, Garfield County aschwaller@garfiield-county.. com 970.945.8212 Original Message From: David Blair, Chief, Grand Valley Fire Protection Dist. [mailto:gvfpd@sopris.net] Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2004 3:39 PM To: Andy Schwaller Subject: VVV & Grace Homes, conditional approval Andy, Per our phone conversation, July 27, 2004, 1536, the Grand Valley Fire Protection District does not have a problem with your office issuing a conditional permit to start the 6-plex project at Valley View Village. This conditional permit should specify, foundation only, no construction involving wood components. Thanks, David A. Blair, Fire Chief Grand Valley Fire Protection District 7/30/2004 Jul 16 2004 9:32RM LOWER VALLEY ENGINEERING (970) 858-2005 Lower Valley ltaghtereeksig and Caterawltinia Inc. rhrol Poor. InsPectm. .awl Cansanq Senze, for Commercial aid Reitidaul Pnletls Ota Mtn Hume Bi4ve Irrfftb t.tnede *WU Ph. Nle) souse F17s) *SLUMS And Schwaller eld County Building Department Fax: 70-384-3470 Re: 1 race Homes Valley View Battlement Mesa 7-16 04 Mr. chillier, COM foun I reviewed verified that the site for the 6-plex at 39 Angelica Circle has soils and acted subgrade fills that are capable of meeting the design requirements for the ation and support of the structure. Sign d, D aft, n R. Adams, P.E. Low r Valley Engineering and Consulting, Inc. RECEIVED JUL 1 6 2004 GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING 8 PLANNING p. 1 4 Garfield County Ms. Diana Drussel, Grace Homes 786 Valley Ct. Grand Junction, CO. 81505 April 23, 2004 BUILDING & PLANNING DEPARTMENT Re: Correction List -Building Permit Application -39 Angelica Circle Dear Ms. Drussel: Upon review of the application for the 6-plex at 39 Angelica, several areas will need to addressed. These areas are as follows: 1. As per Sec. 310.2.2 of the 97 UBC, occupancies having more than 3000 s.f. of floor area above the first floor shall not be less than 1 hr. fire resistive construction throughout. This requirement will need to be added to the plans. 2. As per Sec. 1103.1.9.3 of the code, multi -unit buildings containing four or more dwellings must be built to the accessibility requirements for a Type B dwelling. This allows for the building to be properly sized and adaptable at construction without having to provide all the accessible features required of a Type A building. This requirement is not included with the submitted plans but I believe Bryan Sims is working on a solution. 3. Also redlined on the plans, are the requirements for the engineer of record to inspect the subgrade and foundation prior to the concrete being poured. A letter from the engineer will be required post inspection. 4. As per plat notes associated with the PUD, footer drains and radon testing is required. Both these requirements are noted on the plans. 5. Please verify if the listed and tested 1 hr. assemblies specified in the plans are compatible with the wood I joist floor/ceiling construction shown. The specific I joist manufacturer's tested assemblies may need to be substituted with the assemblies shown on the plans. 6. The separation between the dwelling units required as per Sec. 310.2.2 must also continue through the access/egress stair well of the 2"4 floor through the l' floor. 7. The approved plans will have other corrections red -lined on the plans. With all the projects submitted utilizing the shallow frost protected foundations, an additional insulation inspection will be required prior to backfill to verify the rigid insulation is installed properly as per Sec R403.3 of the 2003 IRC. This inspection can be done by the county inspectors or the engineer of record for the project. 108 8th Street, Suite 201, Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 (970) 945-8212 (970) 285-7972 Fay: (970) 384-3470 Please call if you have any questions. I will continue with the plan review while waiting for the required submittals. Sincerely, Andrew Sckwaller Building Official FAX Number of Pages: 2 Date: CJD—p`1 TO: iRwA �RuS$TL (including this cover sheet) FROM: FAX #: Comments: q CAC 4 -2A - Garfield -2A - Garfield County Building & Planning Department 108 8th Street, Suite 201 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 (970) 945-8212 Fax # (970) 384-3470 FE Garfield County BUILDING & PLANNING DEPARTMENT Ms. Diana Drussel, Grace Homes 786 Valley Ct. Grand Junction, CO. 81505 April 28, 2004 Via fax with hardcopy to follow. Dear Ms. Drussel: Site visits by county personnel over the past several weeks has revealed a potential problem related to the subgrade under some of the proposed building sites. It would appear that fill material is being placed without adequate compaction to support the future buildings. It has been reported that fill depths of 10 feet have been placed without being compacted or tested to see if adequate compaction has been achieved. Also the fill material may not be of a structural nature. It was reported that topsoil with organic material was used in some locations. The problem this presents is possible structural failure of the foundation and buildings or movement that would render the buildings unsafe to occupy. This type of settlement could occur months after completion of the structures. We are requesting the engineer of record review the proposed building sites to address these concerns. A sealed letter from the engineer will be required verifying the fills are constructed in a way to support the designed loads of the buildings. We will continue with the plan reviews, but permits will not be issued until the condition of the subgrade is known. Thank you for your time with this matter. Please call if you have any questions. ,6)‘ Andrew Schwaller Building Official 108 8th Street, Suite 201, Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 /07/11 OAS 17111 //17111 9oc on-ri RECEIVE CUU\` t4) APR 1 52004 APR 1 a 2004 GARFIELD COUNCOUN I nwir&PLANNI BUILDING & PLANNIN Andy Schwaller Chief Building Official Garfield County Building & Planning Dept. 108 8th Street, Suite 201 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Homes REAL ESTATE & CONSTRUCTION • Quality • Value • Integrity 12 -Apr -2004 Dear Andy, Enclosed you will find the revised elevations and the foundation plan to match with the information you required on the plans. Please advise me if we can have our permit now. If you need other information or have questions please call me, Diana, at (970) 523-5555. Thant - ^) Ynaa n Respectfully, / v (�/ Diana Drussel Administrative Assistant 786 Valley Court • Grand Junction, Colorado 81505 Office (970) 523-5555 • Fax (970) 523-0103 04/15/2004 THU 11:06 FAX RECEIVED APR 151"4 FAX COVER SHEET Grace Homes Real Estate and Construction Inc. 786 Valley Court Grand Junction. CO 81505 (970) 523-5555 (970) 5230103 10001/002 lend to: Au SChu) 01 Front 1)144_, 6417 -Fly Covin 8r P nate: 4.,,i5 -*- Pages: (inducing cover) a- Office Location: Grand Junction, CO Faa camber: quo -,y 8,, - M- Phone rkxnber (970) 523-5555 Urgent . Reply ASAP Please Comment Review rax kstormolion Cartiinaic 1l 1I (E� �f i u �c,,� a - 4. * 6 p e.�ce 5 Re1r ft No -Lint ijo w t'irel J' 04/15/2004 THIU 11:08 FAX c6-04 09:54 AM PADS.ARCHITECTS 9702411903 e: Grace Homes Valley Vier/ Battlement Mega March 24, 2004 mos, Developer/ Contractor Construction Division Conn , CO 91504 Ems: Des 917 Grand Vou aro These Department Spedalists, P.C., Architects & Planners Street Junction, CO awn 40002/002 P. a2 to make the fdwirq charges in the construction of the referenced project are In respect b directives received from the Garfield County Bulidlrg communicated to this office by the Building Inspector, Andy Schwager. entry doors and frames between the garage and living areas of the 4-plex and B- unt are required to be 1 -hour. We recommend a hollow mesal door, sold vitt steel frame. 5/8—Inch type 'X' drywall Is to be used on both sides of walls wing and garage areas to maintain a 1 -hour barrier. 2 M urdts where garage Is not heated, R-19 Insulation barrier Is to be used the garage and fivkg areas. On the 6 -pin, this Includes the ceiling of the storage, and sidewdls at exterior exposure. Where storage rooms occur garage and exterior, use 5J8•I1ch type 'X' drywaal an interior of storage R-19 Barrier an exterior walls of storage. Insulation not required in walls of areas that are adjacent to the garage Interiors. 3. 11 French drains are to be installed on the the buildings, see attached 1/AD-1 and 9/A6 on 6-plex plans. Far drain location, sae site end grading a 4. ns. rior separation wall between garages are to be 1 -hour construction wah of R•13 between Individual units. 5. A • • Ronal perimeter foundation insulation Is to be installed Mare Indicated on the ral drawings. See Shuctura! Construction Drawings for location. to grades on the site, steps wIR be required In the foundations and foofknes. steps are she specific to be addressed In the Architect's and Structural s design documents. if required, addendum's wi be Issued to the by the Architect end/or Engineer of record to address site specific s. 917 Main Ste t Wand Junction, Calorida 01501 (070) 241-1901 04/01/2004 THU 09:59 FAX MRR.30_me4 1159PM BATTLEMENT MESA CO N0.022 BATTLEMENT MESA SERVICE ASSOCIATION ARCHITECTURAL COM MIfEE APPLICATION & CB:EC U /ST (for New Boma Construction projects) 10002/007 P. 1 Homeowner: h.l1.4.eL iti,M..a. el P. 4 C 4ms ��. [Lies.- Home14nlmgMdress: '12L Nn 11u,- Li- � et, kr HomePhone: - 1 WorkPhone(if 4 70 , f" 3.56 !1J 55 Project Addrese: - hAe2 s Li i BkrA ek: Subdivision j%G.L4z Via" .136S PmductioaHomePlenName(Ifepp3cablle): (o- r- CIS A -r l I Honsebuild= ..thosi- }i.er to t 12f e + eThrarclettartm. (!a. „1 BusinessMarliogAddzess: 7 - BusinessPbone: 0/ 2:3 I Fax(ifdesaed): ✓i , i i.. Submittal Dade: Estimated Start Dat EatlraaedCompietionDate: SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: Two Copies each of items 1, 2 & 4 need to be submitted. (Cheek-offhemsattached to the Application. Min spaces se indicated.) ✓ 1. Site Plan Drawing (1" =10' or 1" = 20' scale) with the following information shown: Lot, Block & Subdivision mase. Street Address of Project. Building Setback Lines (also 2 -in tiro shortest d!stsaee between property lite to the exterior wall closest to that property Ike). Please be aware that .11 buildiae Setback Lina are taken from your Property Late Pias!! Your Property Line is NOT the Curb Line!! Dwelling Unit ret e Front Setback: ISe _ PO Left Side Setback: .80' VT Right Side Setback: 204 4' a9' Rear Setback: 30' _---EA--- re --EA---✓ Unity Easements __ /r 55' Clear Site -Line at Intersection Comer Lots. ✓ Site Grading Elevations & Drainage. -% First (mala) Floor Height in relation to top of street curb at from -center of lot. —7 -Driveways (mohtding width of driveway), Walkways, Patios, etc. ___ Outbuildings. Page 2 of 6 04/01/2004 THU 10:00 FAX 'MFR 30 2004 1:59PM BATTLEMENT MESA CO 10003/007 NO.022 P.2 2. Architectural Drawings (1/4" =1' or 1/8" = 1' scale) with the following iafonaalion shown Floor Plan(s) with overall dimensions (fill-in the following square foot areas). First Floor Finished Living Area: 4994' square fat Second Floor Finished Living Area: /SL square Stat Lower Floor Finished Living Area: — square fat Total Finished Living Area: 7/ OL. square fat Total Unfinished Living Area: equate feet Garage Area: l.PS%R sirtuatt feet ac // `f) Building Elevations Pima indicating doors, windows, exterior materials, building kight,. roof pitch, roo€motased evaporative coolers, eta (f11 -in maximum height below). Moxa he height to highest ridge IS or building structure/ projection t� , feet above top of street curb at front -center of your lot. ✓ Engineered (stamped) Foundation Plan ✓ Outbuildings iodieatiag dimensions, elevations and overall height to ridge fie / 3. E,derior Materials (ff-in the selections below): ctS / RoofmgMaterial:310 ri,A€4, i.ini ly..1 -Wets Color: .114( Seth( t a_nieseA se' Primary SidingMateri1M,u. Crreh Color: Seams �___ Accent Siding Materiel: MO- tent tn4�t Color. iju /10 ___Z_ Trim Material: Mt LL POW. 111 a yl Color. t(Zt tom' _a MasonryMaterial• — Color: et/A Stucco Materials: — Color: —/-- Front Door Material: %MS Color. 44lj+tra- ✓ Garage Door Metals]: t4VEL Color: 0 -Hirst COLOR SAMPLE COLOR SAMPLE COLOR SAMPLE COLOR SAMPLE COLOR. SAMPLE • COLOR. SAMPLE Page 3 of 6 g4/o1/2004 THtt 10:00 FAX MAR.39.2004 1:59PM BATTLEMENT 'ref CO NO .1322 10004/007 P.3 4. Landscapahrigation Plans with the following information: '/ Planting Plan (indicate areas of arigated lawn, tree placement, shrub beds, ground covet, ,/ etc.). Plant Material listing by species of trees. tubs and grasses. Groundcover Material with weed control barrier. Fences. Other Landscape Improvements (decks, site lighting, tag poles, etc.). po55 c8� 5. Variance Requesst (if applicable) Give details below: 4 bre- �� visaed' OIL eat -e..0 t wf e.J ekeedienot 6 Residual Construction Monetary Deposit: MU D p c r I/We berebyacknowledge and understand that our failure to completeHome Construction, Improvement Projects or Landscaping Construction within the time constraints noted in Conditions 2. & 3. On Page 6 of thb Application will reap in a Notice and Opportunity for a Hearing before the BMSA Board of Directors. If I/We an band In violation of these Conditions at the Hearing it will result in a fig to the Owner of not less than 5500.00 per month for each full month in meets of the allotted completion time frame. UWe hereby acknowledge that Home Construction orlmprovement Projects or Landscape Construction features which are built in non-conformance with this full application, including the Conditions of Approval noted on Page 6 of 6 herein, I/We w171 be cited by the BMSA/AC in written citation form at the time of dbcovery. In extenuating circumstances ■ Variance may be requested from the BMSA/AC. provided such Variance request item le within the purview and approval jurisdiction of the BMSA/AC. If a Variance is not granted by the BMSA/AC and If the Non -Conforming Items are not corrected within 60 days after the date of written citation, I/WewtlI be salved Notice of a Hearing before the BMSA Board of Directors, and if I/We are found in violation of these Non -Conforming Item at the Hearing 1/We be fined a.minimum of 5500.00 per Non -Conforming Item_ Notwithstanding the foregoing, We acknowledge that the BMSA Board of Directors and/or Architectural Committee may pursue any legal remedy available In the event of a non-compliance. Page 4 of 6 04/01/2004 THU 10:00 FAX MAR.30.2004 1:59PM BATTLEMENT MESA CO NO.022 40005/007 P.4 Failure to pay fines levied as determined at the Rearing may also result in a Lien being placed on your Property or litigation Process initiated by the BMSA Board of Directors to secure conformance with this fall Application and its respective Conditions Of Approval UWe understand that Architectural Committee approval does not constitute approval of the local buildlag department, drainage design or structural soundness, nor does it constitute assurance that the plans comply with ail applicable codes, regulations, ordinances and laws. UWe further acknowledge that any subsequent field changes which UWe may desire to the Home Construction or Improvement Projects of this original Application Submittal and the original Conditions of Approval issued by the BMSAJAC will regain an additional Revised Appliadon Submittal on our behalf, and that We will not proceed with any subsequent field changes until a Revised Conditions of Approval have been issued to us by the BMSA/AC. Owner's Signature(s): /Las"�/ 2afier " GP. 'a h hnnpS P/E 4 earAlZe O.� 4/0 Ownex'sPrintedNames: 1144.✓ b ru se.J - o Date: a�/�lo/j94- a Date: Builder's Signature: L. (ethLe IO t4d1.P arts IAA briagrt t:Rt Dale: eV:, 4/0 >t Builders Printed Name: Page 5 of 6 04/01/2004 THU 10.01 FAX . MRR.30.2204 1:59PM BATTLEMENT MESA CO ND. 022 This portion of the Application Fonn is to be completed by the Architectural Committee (not the Applicant). CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL or DISAPPROVAL 4 006/007 P.5 1. No sitework or building consM1c on may proceed on any Lot anclud ng no preliminary site clearing, stabling, grade aeration, storing ofmnaterial, foundation excavation, extension ofimderground utilities, etc,) until the Project ben received a Project approval from the Architectural Committee sad baa been issued a Building Paamt (as required by Garfield County for new home or Renovation projects). 2. All general building and sae improvements construction for any Project shell beoompleted sad shall have issued a Certificate of Occupancy from rhe Garfield County Bmldn'g Department no later than nae (11 yfir der to Sulam date dills Architectural Committee Amoval. 3. The complete landscaping and revegetation ofthe improved Lot, to speoifealtymolude the bra, at and rear yard areas, shall be completed no lata than six (6) months from the date of the Certificate of Occupancy. 4. If the selection of colors and /or lendscap log plane are not included with this application they must be submitted for approval before any action is taken to install the naasbg items. 5. 4 /I /01.1 E » g ' /nCw awce u I b' 1.6ter wr?r4 /rtrLeJ r-eae Lam. 111 M' a. fit..? nwe4 -4 6. 7. Application Approval (l+y nes of Architept}>ral Committee Members): Application Approved, df Coastruclioa subject to the above conditions: By Chairman: Application Denied ankle's of Architectural Committee Members): By: Date: o yr Application Denied for reasoo(s) stated above: By Chairman: Date: Page 6 of 6 04/01/2004 THU 10.01 FAX MAR.30.2004 1:59PM BATTLEMENT MESH CO 2 . ftp.H22 P.6 GNEertc Liv&, .:RoelA. LPFCSttirr,04 BosF t 'Mk ? (w*a/e f 1A-41 0“ ? r ' co fir Mess.2 BATTLEMENT MESA SERVICE ASSOCIATION ARCHMECIIJRAL COMMITTEE APPLICATION SUBMITTAL FORM (For New Home Construction) INSTRUCTIONS: 4007/007 This Application & Checklist is to be used far all project submittals to the Battlement Mesa Service Association Arohitectnaal Committee (HMSAJAC). This form is Mended to assist in assuring that the application submittal is complete. This will help provide a quicker, more thorough review process. It is recommended dna each Applicant thoroughly review the requirements of the current Architectural Standards, the Amende&and Restated Declaration _of Covenants (Mslnfpe Recohttlons) and the recorded Final Plat for their respective neighborhood prior to preparing a subrdttaL Applicants preparing a submittal should compare the information they are about to submit with the requirements ofthis formand "check off' each required item on the form. Ifany ;semis not checked, the Application submittal is not complete and should not be submitted. Inoomplete Applications will act be processed and will be mtrned to the Applicant. hi addition to the checklist, Appy should fin in all ofthe places on the ApplicationForm where information is requested. The ArchitectyaalCommittee Milne thisurformationinevablatingyonrApplication. If information is requested but is not applicable to your specific project submittal, write "N/A" is the space provided. If some returned information is yet'to be determined (such as exterior paint colon you may not have yet selected) write "TDD" in the appropriated space provided. You will then be required to make a follow-up submittal with these selection at a later date but before installation in the home. DO NOT fill in any information is the "Conditions for Approve" taction ofthis loom. This portion of the farm is for Architectural Committee use only. Where as Application is complete, please mail or deliver it to the following address: Battlement Mesa Service Association Architectural Committee Application 73-0 9ipprdk Drive P.O. Box 6006 Battlement Mesa, Colorado 81636 The Architectural Committee meets twice monthly onthc rand 3ie Wednesday, and Applications are due one week prior to the Scheduled Mating Dates for prior review by Committee members. Please contact Jane Chapman at (970) 285-9740 to confirm the neat scheduled meeting date or to request Rather information. We thank you in advance for your cooperation and in complying with the ArchtteetnraI Standards of the Battlement Mesa Service Association Page 1 of 6 03/30/2001 TUE 12:23 FAX HEPWORTH-PAWLAX GEOTECHNICAL August 12, 2003 Grace Homes, Inc. Attn: Terry Lawrence 786 Valley Court Grand )unction, Colorado 81505 X1003/023 Hepworth Pavlak Geutechnical. Inc. 5020 County Rod 154 Glenwood Sot in .. Colorado 01601 Phone: 970-945-7988 Fax 970-945-8454 ernat: epn ikfaxcchgrn lob No. 102 )26 Subject: Clarification of Foundation Drain Recommendations, Proposed Valley View Village, Parcels 2-5 and 2-6, Battlement Mesa, Garfield County, Colorado. Dear Mr. Lawrence: As requested, we have reviewed our preliminary geoteehnirai report dated September 16, 2002 and discussed the findings of the Colorado Geological Survey (CGS) report by Sean Gaffney dated April 28.2003 with respect to foundation drain requirements at the project site. The CGS has stated that they are in general agreement with our und,-rdrain systcm recommendations. The geotechnical exploration generally identified a two layered subsurface profile, the u pper layer being sandy silty slay loess and alluvial fan deposits overlying mud flow cobbles and boulders in a sandy clay matrix. The upper clay soils and underlying mud flow deposits were found to be suitable for support of spread footings. There may be a n eed to design the footings fou a minor to low expansion potential but it has been our experience in Battlement Mesa that because of the high basalt rock content, the potential for foundation heave is low and tolerable for lightly loaded spread footings. The heave potential of the subsoils will be evaluated on a site specific basis fir the building foundation dttiga. Foundation drains are recommended to protect subsurface building areas against hydrostatic pressure buildup and wetting at the below grade level. ba basement areas and with retaining walls, an underdrafn is needed since hydrostatic pressures at that depth could have damaging etruaura! impacts to the walls. Where the subsoils have minor to low potential for collapse or heave, it has bectour experience in Battlement Mesa that underdrains are not needed around shallow (up to about 3 feet del DL� b u d' float slabs constructed near site grade or for crawispaces. Compacted clay backtil with positive surface drainage will adequately protect the beating soils without a foundation drain. The need for a perimeter foundation drain i9 normally considered in the site specific geotechnical study for design level recommendations should be included on' the engineered foundation design Parker 303-841-7119 • Colorado Springs 719.633.5562 • Silvertlwme 970-468-1989 03/30/2004 TUE 12:23 FAX 4004/023 Grace Homes, Inc. August 12, 2003 Page 2 If you have any questions, or require further assistance, please contact our office. Sincerely, HEPWORTH-PAWLAK t ' i r , INC. SLP/rso cc: High Country Land Design Partnership - Atm: Ran Liston ps- g 2 .1)(0 Aliorp 617- .310.2 •Z t_o3_ L�4u _. 01.5.1 Z. t4 Da_ me y S►.,60/. 3 . (2. G--1 s. P- /` x+L., anta3402.43/4„, < l0 4tc_ /00i/23,a - # eP?ite.y - L& __Oa 131+ - L111»ic, _ 24 aft?. - a35B Lw - - 24)2- Gilt 2to S 43_ 31/ _ 3r?_ 3xy _<_/0 occ )314 L,/,u.., 135$Li L, wr _ 1635 _ 4107 469 avec - zco12 60/ E� )625 Gam, termt. it noait - --rt 9_41JIFlcaiart:1 flimea s$a•nwrrp) U 94.4cI - Ufa 1- _Lad_ r.r Lratuy 7�� � $ _ 6.c. 2 118 3 0.z ---x'tzt.. Fa_s_r hod4 (Qatr i a 2-_+ Com_ _C ' % To ) 71°_tj e ,302.4 City. S. 435 .._at i.� /6 at. OLS- . L 47 „Sic 5'7 b_ 2 snetito___ 4.600_1/..sy_t Lo4 __ x-i��JQi _ed i dry_ ?.w,c 2-/ 7/100. 5-a / e rr O.K. 708 3 70E &f_ 708, 3 .. 1, a. tl &ice° )D l /GRt t \�2.+�.. Pie2Zu-d", rr < 10 O.C. AsJi-u.w.rr res 1c5.5( 3. (,,c ._ 2 qcc 310,2 2 Sarni- Q dl"I • _ 1(2 cat •21i7L-tlibt.octigit 310, to FL, 0 a 4 1 - Jan 13 04 05:19p January 13, 2004 gvfpd 9702859740 �AaPr Or GRAND VALLEY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT J' 1777 S. BATTLEMENT PARKWAY PO BOX 295 PARACHUTE, CO 81635 (970) 285-9119, FAX (970) 285-9748 Mark &an Garfield County Building and Planning Department 108 8t Street, Suite 201 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Subject: Temporary Fire Protection requirements for initial construction activities at the Valley View Village Mr. Dean, 1 met this morning with Mr. Bruce Smith, Battlement Mesa Consolidated Metro District and discussed some of the District's concerns regarding use of the current Battement Mesa fire protection hydrant system. He assures me that the Project owner is an approved user of the systan and has all rights to Use water in the event of a fire emergency. Therefore, the requirements of the Grand Valley Fire Protection District will be in accordance with the 1997 Uniform Fire Code and more specifically include: PART 111 - GENERAL PROVISIONS FOR SAFETY ARTICLE 9 - FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS AND WATER SUPPLY Section 901 - General 901.2.2 Plans 901.2.2.1 Fire apparatus access. Plans for fire apparatus aces roads shall be submitted to the fire department for review and approval prior to construction. 901.2.2.2 Fire hydrant system. Plans and specifications for fire hydrant systems, including the use and placement of above stored water tanks, shall be submitted to the firc department for review and approval prior to construct on. 901.3 Timing of Installation. When fire protection, including fire apparatus access roads and water supplies for fire protection, is required to be installed, such protection shall be installed and made serviceable to and during the time of construction. EXCEPTION: When alternate methods of protection, as approved, are provided, the requirements of Section f may be modified or waived. Approved modificationsinclude: o Use of the existing Battlement Mesa fire protection hydrant system for homes, requiring a fire flow of Tess than 1,750 gpm, build within 250 feet of an existing hydrant, as per Appendix 111-B. Structures requiring more than the 1,750 gpm, will need to augment the additional foe Bow requirements with an auxiliary water source. o Above ground stored water tanks, not to contain less than 2,500 gallons each, located at each building site, as per current District requirements for construction and on-going fire protection in die urban -interface area Homes that are being constructed adjacent to each other can use a 5,000 gallon, shared water supply. • A1I above ground stored water tanks will be located within 6 feet of an approved fire apparatus access road (temporary included) as described in Section 902 - F1RE DEPARTMENT ACCESS. p.2 Fai An 41),0-tQ • V 1 Jan 13 04 05:20p gvfpd 9702859748 • All above ground stored water tanks will have an outlet connection of 4 'A", National Hose thread, with a flow control valve located between the connection and tank. • The supply piping to the outlet connection will nix be less than 6" in diameter. • The above ground stoned water supply tank will neon to be provided with freeze protection of both the tank and piping. o Section 902 - FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS o Section 902.2 - Fire Apparatus Access Roads. • Dimension - unobstructed width of not less than 20 feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches • Surface - Fire apparatus access roads shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus and shall be provided with a surface so as to provide all-weather driving capabilities. (Roads shall be designed to support the District's largest potential responding unit - 54,000 lbs.) • Turning radius - The turning radius of a fire apparatus access road shall be as approved. • Dead -ends - Dead-end fire apparatus access roads shall be provided with an approved provision for turning around of fire apparatus. • Obstruction and control of fire apparatus access - The required width of a fire apparatus access road, and space in front of an above stored water supply tank, shall not be obstructed in any manner, winding parking of vehicles Minimum required widths and clearances will established under Section 902.2.2 1 shall be maintained at all times. When the above requirements have been met, the Grand Valley Fire Protection District will recommend issuance of budding permits for home construction. These fire protection requirements are not required for under ground infrastructure installation. If you have any questions regarding these requirements, l can be reached at 285-9119. or 250-9851. David A. Blair District Fire Chief, GVFPD Cc: Board of Directors, GVFPD P/BMVFD Fire Chief, Gary Mahaffey Battlement Mesa Mao District, Bruce Smith High Country Engineering, Ronald Weidler File P.3 tti Sett Nil) CO Garfield County Building and Planning Department Attn: Andrew Schwaller, Building Official 108 Street, Suite 201 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Re: Grace Homes Valley View at Battlement Mesa Buildings at Angelica Circle Dear Mr. Schwaller, Re: Valley View May 4, 2004 We have had several discussions conceming this project pertaining to the Building Code: '97-1103 pertaining to accessibility. The access street, Angelica Circle has a vertical elevation rise of over 30 feet for approximately 500 feet at the Eastem side of the site. This difference in elevation necessitates a vertical drop in the access -way to the units in this area which typically exceeds 30 inches. This change in elevation is documented on the grading plans created by High Country Engineering of Glenwood who is responsible for the site grading and drainage engineering. This difference in grade allows exception in reference to Section 1103.1.9.3-5.1 & 5.2. We are, however, providing type 'B' accessible units as required in the West portion of Angelica Circle which meet those requirements as required by code. Thank you for your attention and indulgence in this matter. Sincerely, ect cialists, P.C. cc: Grace Homes, Attn: Darin Carei RECEIVED MAY 0 a 2004 GARF!ELD GOuN i Y BUILDING & PLANNING 417 Mein Street • Grand .Innrtinn. rninradn RiSni • I07n1 941-1903 ills Yeh and Associates, Inc. ■■ Geotechnical Engineering Consultants 5700 E. Evans Aveauc Denver, CO 80222 Tel.: (303) 181-9590 Fax: (303) 781-9583 April 29, 2004 Mr. Darin Carei Darter, LLC 786 Valley Court Grand Junction, Colorado 81505 420 Seventh Street, Suite 100 Glenwood Springs, CO 8(601 Tel: (970) 384-1500 Fax: (970) 3841501 Proposal No. 2004-P 112 Subject: Proposal for Geotechnical Engineering Study, Valley View Village PUD, Phase A, Battlement Mesa, Garfield County, Colorado Dear Mr. Carei: This letter presents Yeh and Associates, Inc. proposed scope of work and estimated project costs for preparation of a geotechnical study for the subject project. Project Description: The project includes subdivision of a parcel of land for residential housing, construction of utilities and roadways. We were provided with a geotechnical report by HP Geotech for the infrastructure and a site -grading plan by High Country Engineers. The client requires a geotechnical study for the proposed structures to be constructed on the property. Scope of Work: Based on the information provided to us, additional results of field investigation to be performed, and our understanding of the project, we propose the following scope of work for the completion of a geotechnical study: 1. Contract drilling or excavation services for the investigation. This estimate assumes that the client will provide excavation equipment for the test pits. 2. Provide laboratory testing services. 3. Excavate and sample between 12 and 16 borings or test pits at the proposed site. The total number of borings will be determined in the field. Analyze the field data and laboratory test results from the investigation and all pertinent data obtained. Based on this data we will provide a report with recommendations and geotechnical considerations for the following: • An assessment of the groundwater conditions and recommendations for surface and subsurface drainage considerations. • Recommended foundation types and design criteria based on the site and subsurface conditions. • Lateral earth pressures for foundation walls. • Corrosive potential, if any, of soils on concrete. • Backfill soil type and degree of compaction and suitability of on-site soils for use on the project. RECEIVED Foundation construction criteria. A slope stability evaluation and recommendations for mitigation of the potential MAY 0 slope hazard. 2004 GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING & PLANNING .71 S 4. We will observe and document site-specific foundation conditions at the time of excavation for each of the 11 planned structures. Our estimate is based on 3 hours per site for the 11 sites. Contact drilling or excavation services (Task #1) if needed, will be charged at cost plus 15%. The client will be invoiced in accordance with the attached Standard Fee Schedule and General Conditions for all other work. We estimate the following approximate costs for the project: Task 1 (Excavation) Task 2 (Lab) Task 3 (Report) Task 4 (Observation) Mileage and Other Direct Costs Estimated Costs If you have any questions, please feel free to call. Sincerely, Yeh and Assoc Roger Pihl P.G. Principal Attachment: Fee Schedule General Conditions cc: Ronald Weidler, High Country Engineering $ 0 $ 1,500 $ 3,850 $ 2,200 $ 100 $ 7,650 Accepted by: Date: (return by fax to 970-384-1501) r``1 6 14 HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. September 16, 2002 Grace Homes, Inc. Atm: Terry Lawrence 786 Valley Court Grand Junction, Colorado 81505 Job No. 102 526 Subject: Report Transmittal, Preliminary Geotechnical Study, Proposed Roan Cliff Village Development, Parcels 2-5 and 2-6, Battlement Mesa, Garfield County, Colorado Dear Mr. Lawrence: As requested, we have conducted a preliminary geotechnical study for the proposed subdivision development. The site is suitable for the proposed development based on geologic and geotechnical conditions. Conditions that could cause constraints to the development are discussed in the report. Subsurface conditions encountered in the exploratory borings drilled at the site, below about Yh foot of topsoil, consist of nil to 171 feet of very stiff, silty sandy clay overlying relatively dense basalt fragments up to boulder size in a sandy clay matrix. Groundwater was not encountered in the borings and the soils were slightly moist to moist with depth. Bearing conditions throughout the site varied. Spread footings placed on the natural subsoils and designed for an allowable bearing pressure of 1,500 psf to 3,000 psf appear suitable for building support. Building sites with expansive clay may need the footings to be designed for a minimum dead load or the clay removed to exposed the granular subsoils. The report which follows describes our exploration, summarizes our findings, and presents our recommendations suitable for planning and preliminary design. It is important that we provide consultation during design, and field services during construction to review and monitor the implementation of the geotechnical recommendations. If you have any questions regarding this report, please contact us. Sincerely, HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. -e &—Q- Z Trevor L. Knell Rev. by: SLP TLK/djb TABLE OF CONTENTS PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY 1 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 1 SITE CONDITIONS 2 GEOLOGIC CONDITIONS 2 FIELD EXPLORATION 3 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 3 PRELIMINARY DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS 4 FOUNDATIONS - 5 FLOOR SLABS 5 UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM 5 SURFACE DRAINAGE 6 PAVEMENT SECTION THICKNESS 6 LIMITATIONS 7 FIGURE 1 - LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIGURE 2 - 3 - LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIGURE 4 - 7 - SWELL -CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS FIGURE 8 - GRADATION TEST RESULTS TABLE I - SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS H -P GEOTECH PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY This report presents the results of a preliminary geotechnical study for the proposed Roan Cliff Village development to be located on Parcels 2-5 and 2-6, Battlement Mesa, Garfield County, Colorado. The project site is shown on Fig. 1. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the geologic and subsurface conditions and their potential impact on the project. The study was conducted in accordance with our proposal for geotechnical engineering services to Grace Homes, Inc., dated July 1, 2002. A field exploration program consisting of exploratory borings was conducted to obtain information on the subsurface conditions. Samples of the subsoils obtained during the field exploration were tested in the laboratory to determine their classification, compressibility or swell and other engineering characteristics. The results of the field exploration and laboratory testing were analyzed to develop recommendations for project planning and preliminary design. This report summarizes the data obtained during this study and presents our conclusions and recommendations based on the proposed development and subsurface conditions encountered. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The proposed development will consist of mixed use residential and commercial structures. The commercial portion of the development (Lots 84 to 90) will be located in the northeast portion of the site and 83 residential lots will be located to the south of the drainage gully as shown on Fig. 1. We assume buildings will be typical of the area and consist of one to two stories of wood frame construction on slab -on -grade or over a crawlspace or partial basement. We expect foundation loadings will be relatively light. Entrances to the development will be located along West Battlement Parkway and Stone Quarry Road. Private driveways will access the lots from newly constructed interior H -P GEOTECH -2 - roads. Commercial buildings will have slab -on -grade floors. The development will be serviced with municipal water and sewer systems. If development plans change significantly from those described, we should be notified to re-evaluate the recommendations presented in this report. SITE CONDITIONS The site is currently occupied by a ranching operation with related structures and pastures located on approximately 40 acres at the southwest corner of West Battlement Parkway and Stone Quarry Road. The existing residence appears to be abandoned. Several utility easements and dry irrigation ditches transect the property. The ground surface is mostly flat to gently rolling. A deeply incised drainage gully is located in the northeastern third of the site. The gully was dry at the time of our field exploration. Grades range between 5 and 10 percent and generally slope down to the northwest in the proposed building areas. The side slopes of the gully are steep. Vegetation consists of sparse grass in the pastures with brush and sagebrush on the slopes of the drainage and along the north property line. Some mature trees are located near the existing structures north of the drainage. GEOLOGIC CONDITIONS The general site geology at the Battlement Mesa Project Area was observed and described in a preliminary subsoil and geologic study by Chen & Associates, Job No. 11,833 dated January 16, 1975. Parcels 2-5 and 2-6 are situated on the western portion of the Battlement Creek alluvial fan which is composed of interlayered mudflow and alluvial sediments. Deposition of the fan began during late Quaternary time. During this time, climatic conditions were quite varied resulting in alluvial deposition along historic drainages during fairly dry periods and mudflow depositions during wet periods. H -P GEorECH -3 - The mudflow deposits are characterized by a heterogeneous mixture of gravel, cobbles and boulders embedded in a sandy clay matrix. The alluvial sediments are generally more stratified and usually show some degree of sorting. The upper clays are wind blown deposits and alluvial soils derived from reworking of the mudflow deposits by recent and Holocene streams. Bedrock underlying this site is the Eocene Wasatch Formation. Bedrock was not encountered in any of the exploratory borings drilled during the current study and was encountered deeper than 100 feet in other parts of the Battlement Mesa area in borings drilled for previous geotechnical studies. FIELD EXPLORATION The field exploration for the project was conducted on August 20 and 21, 2002. Eight exploratory borings were drilled at the locations shown on Fig. 1 to evaluate the subsurface conditions. The borings were advanced with 4 -inch diameter continuous flight auger powered by a truck -mounted CME -45B drill rig. The borings were logged by a representative of Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. Samples of the subsoils were taken with 1% inch and 2 inch I.D. spoon samplers. The samplers were driven into the subsoils at various depths with blows from a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches. This test is similar to the standard penetration test described by ASTM Method D-1586. The penetration resistance values are an indication of the relative density or consistency of the subsoils. Depths at which the samples were taken and the penetration resistance values are shown on the Logs of Exploratory Borings, Figs. 2 and 3. The samples were returned to our laboratory for review by the project engineer and testing. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Graphic logs of the subsurface conditions encountered at the site are shown on Figs. 2 and 3. The subsoils, below about 1 foot of topsoil, consist of nil to 17' feet H -P GEOTECH -4 - of very stiff, silty sandy clay overlying relatively dense basalt fragments up to boulder size in a sandy clay matrix. Drilling in the dense basalt with auger equipment was difficult due to the cobbles and boulders and drilling refusal was encountered in the deposit at Borings 1, 4 and 8. Laboratory testing performed on samples obtained from the borings included natural moisture content and density, gradation analyses and Atterberg limits. Results of swell -consolidation testing performed on relatively undisturbed drive samples, presented on Figs. 5 to 7, generally indicate low to moderate compressibility under existing moisture conditions and light loading. Samples tested from the northern portion of the site showed a minor collapse potential (settlement under a constant load) when wetted and moderate compressibility with increased loading after wetting . Samples tested from the southern portion of the site typically showed a minor to low expansion potential after wetting. The clay matrix sample from Boring 7 at 10 feet depth showed a high expansion potential when wetted. Results of a gradation analysis performed on a small diameter drive sample (minus 11/2 inch fraction) of the more granular soil matrix are shown on Fig. 8. Atterberg limits testing on the upper fine grained soils and clay matrix soils indicate plasticity ranging from low to high. The laboratory testing is summarized in Table I. No free water was encountered in the borings and the subsoils were slightly moist to moist. PRELIMINARY DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS The conclusions and recommendations presented below are based on the proposed development, subsurface conditions encountered in the exploratory borings, and our experience in the area. The recommendations are suitable for planning and preliminary design, but site specific studies should be conducted for individual lot development. H -P GEOTECH -5 - FOUNDATIONS Bearing conditions will vary depending on the specific building locations and bearing depths. Based on the nature of the proposed construction, spread footings bearing on the natural subsoils should be suitable for building support. We expect the footings can be sized for an allowable bearing pressure in the range of 1,500 psf to 3,000 psf. Expansive clays encountered in building areas may need to be removed or the footings designed to impose a minimum dead load pressure to limit potential heave. Nested boulders could be difficult to excavate and result in irregular bearing conditions. Voids created by boulder removal should be backfilled with compacted road base or concrete. Foundation walls should be designed to span local anomalies and to resist lateral earth loadings when acting as retaining structures. Below grade areas and retaining walls should be protected from wetting and hydrostatic loading by use of an underdrain system. The footings should have a minimum depth of 36 inches for frost protection. FLOOR SLABS Slab -on -grade construction should be feasible for bearing on the natural soils with some risk of post -construction slab movement at sites with expansive clays. The clays could be subexcavated to reduce the potential for slab heave. To reduce the effects of some differential movement, floor slabs should be separated from all bearing walls and columns with expansion joints. Floor slab control joints should be used to reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking A minimum 4 -inch thick layer of free - draining gravel should underlie basement level slabs to facilitate drainage. UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM Although free water was not encountered during our exploration, it has been our experience that local perched groundwater may develop during times of heavy precipitation or seasonal runoff. Frozen ground during spring runoff can create a perched condition. A perimeter underdrain system for shallow crawlspaces should not be required provided that proper drainage is maintained around the buildings. Any H -P GEOTECH -6 - building sites with basement levels or retaining walls should be protected from wetting and hydrostatic pressure buildup by an underdrain system. The drains should consist of drainpipe placed in the bottom of the wall backfill surrounded above the invert level with free -draining granular material. The drain should be placed at each level of excavation and at least 1 foot below lowest adjacent finish grade and sloped at a minimum 1% to a suitable gravity outlet. SURFACE DRAINAGE The grading plan for the subdivision should consider runoff from uphill slopes through the project and at individual sites. Flows should be expected in the gully during intense thunderstorms and unusually heavy snow pack melt. Water should not be allowed to pond which could impact foundations or pavements. To limit infiltration into the bearing soils next to buildings, exterior backfill should be well compacted and have a positive slope away from the building for a distance of at least 10 feet. Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill and landscape irrigation should be restricted in areas with moisture sensitive bearing soils. PAVEMENT SECTION THICKNESS We understand the interior roads and parking areas will be asphalt paved. Design traffic loadings were not available for our analysis. We assume an 18 kip equivalent daily load application (EDLA) of about 10 to 20 for the interior roads with occasional truck traffic, and 5 for automobile parking areas. The subgrade soils encountered at the site are typically low to medium plasticity sandy silty clays which are considered a relatively poor support for pavement materials. Some areas in the northeast commercial area may encounter dense basalt fragments at design subgrade elevations. Based on the soil conditions encountered in the exploratory borings, the laboratory test results and the assumed traffic Loadings, the pavement section should consist of 4 inches of asphalt pavement over 8 inches of base course for the interior through streets in the residential and commercial areas and 3 inches of asphalt pavement on 9 inches of base course for the remaining local streets and commercial lot driveways. H -P GEOTECH -7 - Three inches of asphalt pavement over 6 inches of base course should be used for automobile parking areas. The base course should meet CDOT Class 6 specifications and be compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum moisture. Prior to placing the pavement materials, the entire subgrade area should be stripped of any vegetation and topsoil, adjusted to a moisture content near optimum and compacted to at least 95% of standard Proctor density. The pavement subgrade should be proof -rolled with a heavily loaded pneumatic -tired vehicle. Areas which deform excessively should be removed and replaced to achieve a stable subgrade prior to placing pavement materials. Required structural fill below pavement areas should consist of predominantly granular soils, compacted to at least 95% of standard Proctor density at near optimum moisture content. The subgrade improvements and placement and compaction of base and asphalt materials should be monitored on a regular basis by a representative of the geotechnical engineer. LIMITATIONS This study has been conducted according to generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no warranty either expressed or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from review of previous geologic reports, the exploratory borings located as shown on Fig. 1, the proposed type of construction and our experience in the area. Our findings include interpolation and extrapolation of the subsurface conditions identified at the exploratory borings and variations in the subsurface conditions may not become evident until excavation is performed. If conditions encountered during construction appear different from those described in this report, we should be notified so that re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for planning and preliminary design purposes. We are not responsible for technical interpretations H -P GEOTECH -8 - by others of our information. As the project evolves, we should provide continued consultation, conduct additional evaluations and review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations. Significant design changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommendations presented herein. We recommend on-site observation of excavations and foundation bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a representative of the geotechnical engineer. Respectfully Submitted, HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. -e Trevor L. Knell Reviewed by: • Steven L. Pawlak, P. TLK/djb cc: High Country Engineer].'" ttn: Deric Walter • H -P GEOTECH 53.0 5370 5380 WEST BATTLEMENT PARKWA 5390 5400 5410 7 5350 5360 5370 5380 5390 1279.08 5400 5380 APPROXIMATE SCALE 1" = 200' 5410 5420 5430 5440 5450 102 526 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS Fig. 1 • 4 V v Q • 0 10 15 20 BORING 1 ELEV.= 5372' 29/12 wC-5.4 00106 28/9.10/0 BORING 2 ELEV.= 5391' BORING 3 ELEV.= 5409' 2oh2 , . i 0 106 26/12 � i -200=94 U ' is w0-'4.4 1 it P1=10 ern 00=104 1•11246 , 116/12 Sp: / -. P1-25 qJ 19/6.10/0 w0-8.6 00-113 <) Irko"Sid ' t. 9/12 P 6/2.10/0 PI fp :a + ' Ay'Mis .. , 7 11/12 pdi1 14/12 , I a 10/0 Note: Explanation of symbds is shown on Fig. 4. BORING 4 ELEV.= 5417' 16/12 w0-15.7 -20073 11-49 Pt -20 5 5 10 15 20 Depth — Feet 102 526 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL. INC. LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS Fig. 2 0 1 • 0 0 • 0 5 10 15 20 BORING 5 ELEV.= 5416' 24/12 *0- .5 DD•111 -200-91 1127 Ph5 4/8,30/6 11057 -200-59 11a37 PI -19 8/2.10/0 13/4.10/0 BORING 6 ELEV.= 5392' J25/12 5.7 00-1 DD=10808 41/12 SI° 35/12 �58 11=60 Cly P1=34 .U" sal BORING 7 ELEV.= 5408' 30/12 1100.25.5 00-111 20/12 w0=7.1 00109 -200-88 11=27 P'-7 37/12 *0-13.8 00-115 66/12 Note: Explanation of symbols Is shown, on Fig. 4. BORING 8 ELEV.= 5438' 18/12 *0-6.4 00-108 19/12 *0.15.1 - 20059 1183 Ph40 37/12 *0.12.2 +4=32 - 20048 0 5 10 15 20 Depth — Feet 102 526 HEPWORTH—PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS Fig. 3 LEGEND: ®TOPSOIL; silty sandy clay, organic, firm, slightly moist, brown. M 29/12 CLAY (CL); silty, slightly sandy to very sandy, occasional gravels, stiff to very stiff, slightly moist to moist with depth, light brown to brown, slightly calcareous, low to medium plasticity. CLAY AND GRAVEL (CL—GC); sandy, occasional cobbles, very stiff/medium dense, moist, brown, shale and basalt fragments. Medium to high plasticity fines. BASALT FRAGMENTS UP TO BOULDER SIZE (GC); in a sandy clay matrix, medium dense to dense, moist, brown. Medium to high plasticity fines. Relatively undisturbed drive sample; 2—inch I.D. California liner sample. Drive sample; standard penetration test (SPT). 1 3/8 Inch I.D. split spoon sample, ASTM D-1586. Drive sample blow count; indicates that 29 blows of a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches were required to drive the California or SPT_sampler 12 inches. i Disturbed bulk sample. Practical rig refusal. Where shown above bottom of log, indicates multiple attempts were made to advance the boring. NOTES: 1. Exploratory borings were drilled on August 20 and 21, 2002 with a 4—inch diameter continuous flight power auger. 2. Locutions of exploratory borings were measured approximately by pacing from features shown on the site plan provided. 3. Elevations of exploratory borings were obtained by interpolation between contours on the site plan provided. 4. The exploratory boring locations and elevations should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. 5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory boring logs represent the approximate boundaries between material types and tronsitions may be gradual. 6. No free water was encountered in the borings at the time of dnlling or when checked on September 5, 2002. Fluctuation In water level may occur with time. • 7. Laboratory Testing Results: WC = Water Content (% ) DD = Dry Density ( pcf ) +4 = Percent retained on No. 4 sieve. —200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve. LL = Liquid Limit (% ) PI Plasticity Index ( % ) 102 526 HEPWORTH—PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. LEGEND AND NOTES Fig. 4 Compression X Compression X 0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4 0.1 1.0 0 APPUED PRESSURE — ksf 100 Moisture Content = 8.6 percent Dry Density = 113 pcf Sample of: Sandy Clay From: Boring 3 at 4 Feet �`� . Compression upon wetting 0.1 1.0 0 APPUED PRESSURE — ksf 100 102 526 HEPWORTH—PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Fig. 5 Moisture Content = 5.4 percent Dry Density = 106 pcf Sample of: Sandy Clay with Gravel From: Boring 1 at 2 Feet ~4 VP, Compression upon wetting 0.1 1.0 0 APPUED PRESSURE — ksf 100 Moisture Content = 8.6 percent Dry Density = 113 pcf Sample of: Sandy Clay From: Boring 3 at 4 Feet �`� . Compression upon wetting 0.1 1.0 0 APPUED PRESSURE — ksf 100 102 526 HEPWORTH—PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Fig. 5 Compression — Expansion % 2 1 0 1 2 2 I 0 c 0 S I a E 2 • 0.1 .0 0 APPUED PRESSURE — ksf 100 Moisture Content = 5.5 percent Dry Density = 111 pcf Sample of Sandy Clay From: Boring 7 at 1 Foot Expansion upon wett ng 0.1 .0 10 APPUED PRESSURE — ksf 100 102 526 HEPWORTH—PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Fig. 6 Moisture Content = 5.7 percent Dry Density = 108 pcf Sample of Sandy Clay From;Boring 6 at 2 Feet ii -G.:**". -***-....-.61\.....0 Expansion upon wett ng 0.1 .0 0 APPUED PRESSURE — ksf 100 Moisture Content = 5.5 percent Dry Density = 111 pcf Sample of Sandy Clay From: Boring 7 at 1 Foot Expansion upon wett ng 0.1 .0 10 APPUED PRESSURE — ksf 100 102 526 HEPWORTH—PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Fig. 6 Compression — Expansion % Compression — Expansion % 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 0.1 1.0 0 APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf 100 Moisture Content = 6.4 percent Dry Density = 106 pcf Sample of: Very Sandy Cloy From: Boring 8 at 2 Feet Expansion upon wetting 0.1 .0 0 APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf 100 102 526 HEP WORTH —PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Fig. . 7 Moisture Content = 13.8 percent Dry Density = 115 pcf Sample of: Sandy Clay Matrix From: Boring 7 at 10 Feet • 0 Expansion upon wetting • • 0.1 1.0 0 APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf 100 Moisture Content = 6.4 percent Dry Density = 106 pcf Sample of: Very Sandy Cloy From: Boring 8 at 2 Feet Expansion upon wetting 0.1 .0 0 APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf 100 102 526 HEP WORTH —PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Fig. . 7 • : NTR Mf • 24 1t nil 0 45 la 15 1[1. 10 20 40 e0 00 70 00 30 100 MYd1A1EER ANALYSIS 71E READINGS 601901 111144. 4 lilt 1 1011. 000 ANPLISIS ICS. STANDARD 100 170 016 p CLEAR SQUARE CPENDIDDS • 2/1* 3/P 11/t Y S6' — •� OEN 1•1111111 • Mal Mall Mla NUN a. SI INN SF a•la la_ IIA _ON-- a-- Ilaaa_� ._--- �— Sal� .---- � — S__ SIM a — —a air aa/Nal _ ---�� a — a II/ SS Sal NMI OEM SIL MIA laa M- 941 SMI ala Gann . 901 AOC .000 .009 .010 .037 .074 .100 d00 .000 1.11 220 DIAMETER OF PAR11CLES IN MIWMETERS 4.70 6-012.5 19.0 373 76.2 102 127 100 203 CLAY 10 ELT GRAVEL 32 % I RA' 1 MEO• W ICOARSE I 10E 1 COARSE SAND 22 % SILT AND CLAY 46 % LIQUID LIMIT PLASTICITY INDEX SAMPLE OF: Gravelly Sand and Clay Matrix FROM: Boring 8 at 10 Feet 102 526 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. Wean 90 60 70 60 00 40 30 20 10 0 • • TPA `'' GRADATION TEST RESULTS Fig. 8 0 N u7 0 •O Z O i c 0 agg sandy clay with gravel II r m V V C N > 07 v 0 c 0 (0 > L oto - N slightly sandy clay II sandy clay with gravel (matrix) `I >- co m V c N N T S — N sandy clay with gravel (matrix) II sandy clay with gravel (matrix) 11 sandy clay sandy clay and silt sandy clay (matrix) very sandy clay II sandy clay with gravel (matrix) gravelly sand and clay (matrix) Q _ u ii (? h a et Q ID N a V Q co c co (9 N a d Q r O N a c 4 x_ S 25 O , N CO Ir Tr CO N 0 et °� f f(D > > - et CO 49 27 N M 0 (O N N M (O Z 73 W a E I ; . m 83 d rn M N r rn Q) (0) 00 10 0 w O) 10 46 z F 0 I,N - e - N N �r 0 1 M J e G R1 _ Z p r 0 r 108 r r .- r r M O r r r• r M O r r- (O 0 r u et IA et et d: (G (O M r to , 5.8 8.7 1� In tb e1- (O to r N co 2 et, m N .N- SAMPLELOCATON 6 i N N r d N r et N ° r 0 Or N 10 OL 0 B i 0 m r N M et lD 0 N. W Project Number: Project Name:6-plex Address: Occupancy: R1, U1 Construction: V -N Gafield County Building and Planning 108 8th Street Ste 201 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 970-945-8212 Plan analysis based on the 1997 Uniform Building Code Date: April 22, 2004 Contractor:Grace homes Architect: Engineer: Report By: A. Schwaller NOTE: The code items listed in this report are not intended to be a complete listing of all possible code requirements in the 1997 UBC. It is a guide to selected sections of the code. •Ztrnric-ti-r-a 77s X03 i\fit Gey Page # 2 Code review for: Project Id.: Address: The maximum allowed R1 area on the 2nd floor is 3000 sq.ft. unless the building is of 1 hour fire -resistance construction. -- Sec. 310.2.2 PENETRATIONS OF FIRERESISTIVE ASSEMBLIES WALLS ASSEMBLIES -- Sec. 709.6 Through penetrations: 1) Penetrations shall be installed as tested in the rated assembly. -- Sec. 709.6.2 2) Penetrations shall be protected by an approved penetration firestop system and shall have an F rating of not less than the required rating of the wall penetrated. -- Sec. 709.6.3 Exception: When penetrating items are steel, ferrous or copper pipes or steel conduits and the wall is concrete or masonry, the annular space shall be permitted to be grout or mortar. The minimum thickness is the thickness required to maintain the fire rating. The maximum size of the penetrating items is equivalent to a 6 -inch diameter and the opening is a maximum of 144 square inches. -- Sec. 709.6.1 Membrane penetrations: The requirements are the same as for through penetrations. -- Sec. 709.7 Exceptions: 1. Steel electrical outlet boxes that do not exceed 16 square inches provided that the area of such openings does not exceed 100 square inches for any 100 square feet of wall area. Boxes on opposite sides of the assembly shall be separated by a horizontal distance of not less than 24 inches. 2. Sprinklers with metal escutcheon plates. Noncombustible penetrating items shall not be connected to combustible materials on both sides of the membrane unless it can be confirmed that the fire -resistive integrity of wall is maintained. -- Sec. 709.7 Page # 3 Code review for: Project Id.: Address: FLOOR/CEILING AND ROOF/CEILING ASSEMBLIES -- Sec. 710.2 Through pentrations: Through penetrations of fire -resistive horizontal assemblies shall be enclosed in fire -resistive shaft enclosures. -- Sec. 710.2.1 Exceptions: 1. When penetrating items are steel, ferrous or copper conduits, pipes, tubes and vents through a single concrete floor, the annular space shall be permitted to be grout or mortar. The minimum thickness is the thickness required to maintain the fire rating. The maximum size of the penetrating items is equivalent to a 6 -inch diameter and the opening is a maximum of 144 square inches. 2. Electrical outlet boxes that have been tested for use in fire -assemblies. The system shall have an F rating and a T rating of not less than one hour but not less than the required rating of the floor system. -- Sec. 710.2.3 Exception: Floor penetrations contained and located within the cavity of a wall do not require a T rating. Membrane penetrations: The requirements are the same as for through penetrations. -- Sec. 710.3 Exceptions: 1. When penetrating items are steel, ferrous or copper conduits, electrical outlet boxes, pipes, tubes and vents through concrete or masonry and the annular space is protected by an approved penetration firestop assembly or protected to prevent the free passage of flame and products of combustion. Such penetrations shall not exceed an aggregate area of 100 square inches in any 100 square feet of ceiling area in assemblies without penetrations. 2. Electrical outlet boxes that have been tested for use in fire -assemblies. 3. Sprinklers with metal escutcheon plates. Fire -resistive roofs may have unprotected openings. Sec. 710.4 Page # 4 Code review for: Project Id.: Address: SMOKE and FIRE DAMPERS -- Sec. 713.10 and 713.11 Dampers shall be accessible for inspection and servicing: 1. Penetrations through area separation walls. Penetrations through occupancy separations. 2. Penetrations of the fire -resistive construction of horizontal exit walls or corridors serving as a means of egress. Exception: Openings for steel ducts penetrating the required fire -resistive construction of corridors are not required to have smoke dampers when such ducts are of not less than 0.019 -inch thickness (26 gage) and have no openings serving the corridor. 3. Penetrations of shaft enclosures. Exceptions: 1. Duct penetrations by steel exhaust air subducts extending vertically upward at least 22 inches above the top of the opening in a vented shaft where the airflow is upward. 2. Penetrations of a fire -resistive floor forming the base of a shaft enclosure may be protected by fire dampers listed for installation in the horizontal position. 3. Smoke dampers are not required when shaft is exhaust only, and is used for continuously operating fans. 4. Penetrations of the ceiling of fire -resistive floor -ceiling or roof -ceiling assemblies. Exception: Smoke dampers are not required. 5. Penetrations of an atrium enclosure element. Exception: Smoke dampers are not required. 6. Penetrations of exterior walls where protection of openings is required. Exception: Smoke dampers are not required. 7. Penetrations of areas of refuge. Exception: Ventilation system designed to supply outside air during an emergency. 8. Smoke dampers are required in smoke barriers and elevator lobbies. Page # 5 Code review for: Project Id.: Address: DRAFT STOPS: If there is combustible construction in the floor/ceiling assembly, draft stops shall be installed in line with walls separating individual dwelling units and guest rooms from each other and from other areas. - - Sec. 708.3.1.1.2 If there is combustible construction in the roof/ceiling assembly, draft stops shall be installed in line with walls separating individual dwelling units and guest rooms from each other and from other areas. - - Sec. 708.3.1.2.1 FOR R1 OCCUPANCY: A 1 hr. occupancy separation is required around common storage and laundry rooms. -- Sec. 310.2.2 A 1 hr. fire separation is required between dwelling units. - - Sec. 310.2.2 For the minimum width of doors, see Sec. 1003.3.1.3 For the minimum width of hallways, see Sec. 1004.3.3.2 For the minimum width of corridors, see Sec. 1004.3.4.2 For the minimum width of stairways, see Sec. 1003.3.3.2 FOOTNOTES: FLUSH AND SURFACE BOLTS: Manually operated edge- or surface -mounted flush bolts and surface bolts or any other type of device that may be used to close or restrain the the door other than by operation of the locking device shall not be used. When automatic flush bolts are used, the door leaf having the automatic flush bolt shall not have a door knob or surface -mounted hardware. The unlatching of any leaf shall not require more than one operation. -- Sec. 1003.3.1.8 LOCKS AND LATCHES: Regardless of the occupant load served, exit doors shall be openable from the inside without the use of a key or any special knowledge or effort. -- Sec. 1003.3.1.8 Page # 6 Code review for: Project Id.: Address: STAIR NOTES: Private stairs: Private stairways and stairs serving an occupant load less than 10: 1) A private stairway must be at least 36 inches wide. -- Sec. 1003.3.3.2 2) The maximum rise of a step is 8 inches and the minimum run is 9 inches. -- Sec. 1003.3.3.3, Exception 1 3) Provide a handrail on one side of stairway 34 to 38 inches above the nosing if there is more than 3 risers. -- Sec. 1003.3.3.6, Exceptions 4) Provide a guard rail where drop off is greater than 30 inches. - - Sec. 509.1 5) The minimum height is 42 inches. -- Sec. 509.2 6) Open guardrails shall have intermediate rails or ornamental pattern such that a sphere 4 inches in diameter cannot pass through. - - Sec. 509.3 The triangular opening formed at the riser, tread and guardrail may be 6 inches. -- 509.3, Exception 2 7) The minimum headroom is 6 ft.- 8 inches. Such clearance shall be measured vertically from a plane parallel and tangent to the stairway tread nosing to the soffit above at all points. -- Sec. 1003.3.3.4 8) Enclosed usable space under the stairs is required to be protected as required for 1 hr. fire -resistive construction. -- Sec. 1003.3.3.9 LANDINGS AT DOORS: 1) A floor or landing shall be provided on each side of doors. When access for persons with disabilities is required. the floor or landing shall not be more than 1/2 inch lower than the threshold. When access is not required, the maximum is 1 inch. -- Sec. 1003.3.1.6 2) Landings shall have a width not less than the width of the stairway or width of the doorway, whichever is the greater. Where a landing serves an occupant load of 50 or more, doors in any position shall not reduce the landing dimension to less than one half it required width. The minimum length in the direction of exit travel is 44 inches. - - Sec. 1003.3.1.7 TRAVEL DISTANCE: (distance to an exit) The maximum travel distance in this building is 200 feet. -- Sec. 1004.2.5. Travel distance shall not be limited within an exit enclosure or exit passageway. -- Sec. 1005.2.2 BUILDING ACCESSIBILITY: 1) This building including each tenant shall be provided with at least one entrance which complies with the accessible route provisions of CABO/ANSI A117.1. At least 50 percent of all entrances shall be accessible. -- Sec. 1103.2.3 Page # 7 Code review for: Project Id.: Address: ROOFING REQUIREMENTS: 1) The roofing on this building is required to be Class C. -- Table 15-A 2) See section 1504 and ICBG research reports for requirements. FIRE ALARM SYSTEM: A manual fire alarm system need not be provided when all units and contiguous attic and crawl spaces are separated from each other and public or common areas by at least one-hour fire -resistive occupancy separations and each unit has an exit directly to the exterior. -- Sec. 310.10 exc. 1 The alarm system is to be as set forth in the Fire Code. LIGHT AND VENTILATION 1) A11 habitable rooms require exterior glazed openings equal to 1/10 or more of the floor area. (min 10 sq.ft.) -- Sec. 1203.2 Exception: Kitchens may be provided with artificial light. 2) All habitable rooms require an operable exterior openings equal to 1/20 or more of the floor area. (min 5 sq.ft.) -- Sec. 1203.3 The minimum area in bath rooms is 1 1/2 sq.ft. Exc: Laundry Rooms In lieu of required exterior openings for ventilation, a mechanical ventilation system may be provided. Such system shall be capable of providing two air changes per hour. 3) In bathrooms containing a bathtub or shower and laundry rooms, the ventilation system shall be connected directly to the outside and be capable of providing five air changes per hour. The point of discharge shall be at least 3 feet from any openings which allows air entry into the building. Rooms which only contain a water closet and/or lavatory may be vented using a mechanical recirculating fan designed to remove odors from the air. -- Sec. 1203.3 Page # 8 Code review for: Project Id.: Address: WALL AND CEILING FINISH: 1) Wall and ceiling finish materials are required to comply with Sec. 804.1 and Table 8-B. 2) Carpeting on the ceiling is required to have a Class I flame spread rating. -- Sec. 804.2 3) Textile wall coverings shall have Class I flame spread rating. and shall be protected by automatic sprinklers or meet the acceptance criteria of U.B.C. Standard No. 8-2 -- Sec. 805 4) Toilet room floors shall have a smooth, hard nonabsorbent surface that extends upward onto the walls at least 5 inches. - - Sec. 807.1.1 5) Walls within 2 feet of the front and sides of urinals and water closets shall have a smooth, hard nonabsorbent surface. - - Sec. 807.1.2 INSULATION NOTES: 1) All insulation material including facings are required to have a flame -spread rating of 25 or less and a maximum smoke density of 450 unless it is in a concealed space and the facing is in contact with a wall or ceiling. -- Sec. 707.3 exc.2 2) Foam plastic insulations are required to be protected. -- Sec. 2602 ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS: For R1 occupancy 1) Provide a window or door to the exterior from every room used for sleeping. -- Sec. 310.4. The window must provide a clear open area of 5.7 sq.ft., a clear height of 24 inches(minimum), and a clear width of 20 inches(minimum). -- Sec. 310.4 2) All habitable rooms require exterior glazed openings equal to 1/10 or more of the floor area. (min 10 sq.ft.) -- Sec. 1203.2 3) All habitable rooms require an operable exterior openings equal to 1/20 or more of the floor area. (min 5 sq.ft.) -- Sec. 1203.3 4) Apartments - Provide a smoke detector in all sleeping rooms and areas having access to sleeping rooms. -- Sec. 310.9.1.4 5) Hotel/Motel - Provide a smoke detector in the main room or each sleeping room. -- Sec. 310.9.1.5 6) The minimum ceiling in a habitable space is 7 feet 6 inches except kitchens, halls, and baths may have a ceiling height of 7 feet. - - Sec. 310.6.1 Page # 9 Code review for: Project Id.: Address: GLAZING REQUIREMENTS All glazing in hazardous locations is required to be of safety glazing material. -- Sec. 2406.3 & 2406.4 Locations: 1) Glazing in ingress and egress doors except jalousies. 2) Glazing in fixed and sliding panels of sliding door assemblies and panels in swinging doors other than wardrobe doors. 3) Glazing in storm doors. 4) Glazing in all unframed swinging doors. 5) Glazing in doors and enclosures for hot tubs, whirlpools, saunas, steam rooms, bathtubs and showers. Glazing in any portion of a building wall enclosing these compartments where the bottom exposed edge of the glazing is less than 60 inches above a standing surface and drain inlet. 6) Glazing in fixed or operable panels adjacent to a door where the nearest exposed edge of the glazing is within a 24 -inch arc of either vertical edge of the door in a closed position and where the bottom exposed edge of the glazing is less than 60 inches above the walking surface. 7) Glazing in an individual fixed or operable panel, other than those locations described in items 5 and 6 above, than meets all of the following conditions: A. Exposed area of an individual pane greater than 9 square feet. B. Exposed bottom edge less than 18 inches above the floor. C. Exposed top edge greater than 36 inches above the floor. D. One or more walking surfaces within 36 inches horizontally of the plane of the glazing. 8) Glazing in railings regardless of height above a walking surface. Included are structural baluster panels and nonstructural in -fill panels. 9) Glazing in walls and fences used as the barrier for indoor and outdoor swimming pools and spas when the bottom edges is less than 60 inches above the pool side and the glazing is within 5 feet of the pool or spa water's edge. 10) Glazing in walls enclosing stairway landings or within 5 feet of then bottom and top of stairways where the bottom edge is less than 60 inches above the walking surface. Page # 10 Code review for: Project Id.: Address: ATTIC REQUIREMENTS: 1) Provide an access to all attic areas with a clear height of 30 inches or more. The minimum size is 22 inches by 30 inches. There must be 30 inches or more clear height above the access. -- Sec. 1505.1 2) Provide ventilation in all attic areas. The net free vent area is to be not less than 1 square foot for each 150 square feet of attic area. The vent area may be 1/300 if at least 50% of the required ventilating area is provided by ventilators located in the upper portion of the attic. The upper ventilators must be at least 3 feet above the eave or cornice vents. -- Sec. 1505.3, Exception 1 The vent area may be 1/300 provided a vapor retarder having a transmission rate not exceeding 1 perm is installed on the warm side of the attic insulation. -- Sec. 1505.3, Exception 2 3) Where eave or cornice vents are installed, insulation shall not block the fee flow of air. A minimum of 1 inch of air space shall be provided between the insulation and roof sheathing. -- Sec. 1505.3 INSPECTION WILL NOT BE MADE UNLESS THIS CARD IS POSTED ON THE JOB 24 HOURS NOTICE REQUIRED FOR INSPECTIONS BUILDING PERMIT GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO Date Issued.,.../"' ' Zoned Area Permit No gtal AGREEMENT In consideration of the issuance of this permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with all Ian and regulations related to the zoning, location; construction and erection of the proposed structure for which this permit is granted, and further agrees that if the above said regulations are not fully complied with in the zoning, location, erection and construction of the above described structure, the permit may then be revoked by notice from the County Building Inspector a at IMMEDIATELY BECOME NULLS ANDSVOID. Use L^^ !A/ 6 � � �1\yW�� �/yy� � ejt;thac Addre or Legal Descriptio Ow= 141tnr Contractor Clia- Setbacks Front Side Side Rear This Card Must Be Posted So It is Plainly Visible From The Street Until Final Inspection. INSPECTION RECORD Footing 2-411 <..,�,, a„` _, Foundation ,,_ Wie Underground Plumbing $-I`04 Insulation t -1? -05- A, Rough Plumbing 1 -1-Os- On Drywall 2./-p5 pot_ Chimney & Vent t_gr-o5R}yi. Electric Final (by State tnspector1- •o5rio Gas Piping / -' asp ... 05, f44_ Final i-,21:05- a- -,21:0sa- Electric Rough (By State Inspector] "y C Electric Septic Final Framing t -9-S- 05 fain_ (To include Roof in place and Windows and Doors installed). Notes: t.)4 VI-- 28-0'f Ow ALL LISTED ITEMS MUST BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE COVERING - WHETHER INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR, UNDERGROUND OR ABOVE GROUND. THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE Phone 3845003 109 8th Street County Courthouse Glenwood Springs, Colorado. APPROVEDDO NOT DESTROY THIS CARD Date / n �" �f � IF PLACED UTSIDE COVER WITH CLEAR PLASTIC