Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication- PermitGarfield County Building & Sanitation Department 108 8`" Street, Suite #201 Glenwood Springs, Co. 81601 Office- 945-8212 Inspection Line- 384-5003 Leif q(0 1/4 /� \chile V c \) 1 11c9e- C� Job Address An AkCC� c 1 . .. ? ne h( £L Nature of Work Building Permit (ACP - / 71-C) - CC)1 NO. C a)y Use of Building Owner eta et_ r\D Contractor Amount of Permit $ ID, ILS. Date Clerk No �r�j t4 Job Addr- s Sao ab •• di a t I• �:( Owner ti • •b L Contractolr BUILDIN PE Assessor's Parcel No amu - - -ooi Date • /� /�i\a Jiwrit. Ct. l . l Phone #P" SSSS RD Setbacks: Front Rear ru,-tN,w,�.a Soils Test Footing Foundation Grout Underground Plum ng + -a tat Rough Plumbing roar -tom- i Framing `/- Insulation I-7-1 'OS Myk Roofing Drywall -1 -DS ,91* Gas Piping go -4c Addre Address Phone # RH LH Zoning U (c)p -Of L415RZ -INSPECTIONS NOTES Weatherproofing Mechanical Electrical Rough (State) 1- 21- 05Cd-o Electrit;al i (State) 5 — I b -CS C04-0 Final[�hecklist feted? Certificate Occupancy # SJ Date G' /i' .S Septic System # Date Final Oth C.c7, Ce Pretzc �>tcf t r tr..TI 4 kianecio Cw EXTERIOR Address No Drainage Decks -support & clearance to wood Decks -stairs & rails Exrsnor locks Flashing wound doors 8 windows Insect screens INTERIOR GARAGE Fire wall separation Service doors -13/4" min. Door (20 min.) wlaulo closer -1W min Mech. equip. 16" above floor No opening into sleeping area BASEMENT -CRAWL AREA Access Insulation A m— Neadroom/Slalra Vemilation FINAL CHECKLIST MECHANICAL ROOM Boller Hot water F A. gadoil Floor drain Clearance as q 6 Air con system Hol water heater Combustion air Gas piping, valves LPG Drain FIREPLACEISTOVE Clearance to combustibles Termination of chimney Combustion air Hearth (12" or 20" on sides) Glasa doors Certified by - REMARKS (continue on back) STAIRWAYS Headroom (6'6") Railing & guardrails Width Y ✓ Rise & nun KITCHEN Clearance above gnII Exhaust fan Broiler exhaust (1 hr. chase) BEDROOMS Egress Smoke detector BATHROOMS Exhaust fan Shatterproof glass OTHER • • aziactiha Permit No: GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION 108 8 Street, Suite 201, Glenwood Springs, CO 61601 Phone: 970-945-62121 Fax: 970-384-3470/Inspection Line:: 9OT 70-38= - Parcel/Schedule No: 240 ' 12,1 - Oa- 001 77 AGREEMENT PERMISSION 1S HEREBY GRANTED TO THE/GPLICANT AS OWNER, CONTRACTOR AND/OR THE AGENT OF THE CONTRACTOR OR OWNER TO CONSTRUCT THE STRUCTURE AS DETAILED ON PLANS SND SPECIFICATIONS SUBMITTED TO_AND REVIEWED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. IN CONSIDERATION OF THE ISSSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT, THE SIGNER HEREBY AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL BUILDING CODES AND LAND USE REGULATIONS ADOPTED BY GARFIELD COUNTY PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GIVEN IN 30.28301 CRS AS AMENDED. THE SIGNER FURTHER AGREES THAT IF THE ABOVE SAID ORDINANCES ARE NOT FULLY COMPILED WITH IN THE LCOATION, ERECTION, CONSTRUCTION, AND USE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED STRUCTURE, THE PERMIT MAY BE REVOKED BY NOTICE FROM THE COUNTY AND THAT THEN AND THERE IT SHALL BECOME NULL AND VOID. THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMT BASED UPON PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA SHALL NOT PREVENT THE BUILDING OFFICIAL FROM THEREAFTER REQUIRING THE CORRECTION OF ERRORS IN SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA OR FROM PREVENTING BUILDING OPERATION BEING CARRIED ON THEREUNDER WHEN IN VIOLATION OF THS CODE OR ANY OTHER ORDINANCE OR REGULATION OF THIS JURISDICTION. THE REVIEW OF SUBMITTED PUNS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND INSPECTIONS CONDUCTED THEREAFTER DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ACCEPTANCE OF ANY RESPONSIBILITIES OR LIABLITIES BY GARFIEID COUNTY FOR ERRORS, OMISSIONS OR DISCREPENCIES. THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THESE ITEMS AND IMPLEMENTATION DURING CONSTRUCTION RESTS SPECIFICIALLY WITH THE ARTICTECT, DESIGNER, BUILDER, AND OWNER. COMMENTS ARE INTENDED TO BE CONSERVATIVE AND IN SUPPORT OF THE OWNERS INTEREST. Gvrom.003 ( ///� 1 HEREDY AQC NOVjLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE AGREEMENT ABOVE (INITIAL): Cat�71b Job Address: Ismi 4 �vlq ii t CACI rac &' - pl t.) 1 Lot No 4fo Buw, 1M lock No 1 -Lo A1E42 Sub . / E: mp on: Nile& ThVaP4t)610►4 . . 2 O r: (mem L 2 i�pv 4L 4 dr PA(.lal f Tee h: . LE 6555 Wk Ph: fie_. 3 oatnetor: ct _ P e, A Teas: r, byt Ph: Llc. No. 4=eel/Enter:UlJ • Akddre��' (17 1vlat tt __�rphh 'fl0 • aA . {Mo Llc. No. 5 �kCGta.Nyes Sq. FL o Build: Q , I (� d �t CJ J Ft. of� l ;cocci,- Height 2 A 1 _ to tt "Mf'In'1•i Jr No. of Floors: Z 6 Use of Building: 7 Describe Work: h Lw 1 •t�./ 8 Class of Work: New Addition o Alteration o Remove 0.s.. o Move 9 10 Garage: 4..e -n ogle o Doable Carport: a Single o Double o Driveway Permit ❑ On -Site Sewage Disposal o Site Plan (Septic) 11 Valuation of Work: S400, Roa• Adjusted Valuations: 12 Special Conditions: D nen 1 22 ?LLAT i4 FS Pr ,af4,C.,-Fg EL,gas to A SEPARATE ISSUED THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZED CONSTRUCTION PERIOD I HEREBY APPLICATION PROVISIONS COMPLETED GRANTING TO VIOLATE LOCAL OF•• ISillastaidell NOTICE ELECTRICAL PERMIT 18 REQUIRED AND MUST BE BY THE STATE OF COLORADO. BECOMES NULL AND VOID 1F WORK OR CONSTRUCTION IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 180 DAYS, OR IF OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A OF 180 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL OF LAWS GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE WITHIN WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE OF A PERMIT DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY OR CANCEL THE PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR LAW REGULATING CONSTRUCTION OR THE PERFORMANCE NSrRUCTION. e s / / 1 Plan Check Fee: / 2 245,57 Permit Fee: "2d O4tC �;i . ! ss Total Fee: Dated✓ Permit Issued: /O /D9, j OSI Croup: Const.Type: ff iilL Zomig: Setbacks: ISDS No. & Fee: P cwt a ' x724. 35 =14358.,0 s t NA ,P b/WSU�; k ‘,74J-01 0 ;f/ .i" ' APPRO 1 , �/ , 77 AGREEMENT PERMISSION 1S HEREBY GRANTED TO THE/GPLICANT AS OWNER, CONTRACTOR AND/OR THE AGENT OF THE CONTRACTOR OR OWNER TO CONSTRUCT THE STRUCTURE AS DETAILED ON PLANS SND SPECIFICATIONS SUBMITTED TO_AND REVIEWED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. IN CONSIDERATION OF THE ISSSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT, THE SIGNER HEREBY AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL BUILDING CODES AND LAND USE REGULATIONS ADOPTED BY GARFIELD COUNTY PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GIVEN IN 30.28301 CRS AS AMENDED. THE SIGNER FURTHER AGREES THAT IF THE ABOVE SAID ORDINANCES ARE NOT FULLY COMPILED WITH IN THE LCOATION, ERECTION, CONSTRUCTION, AND USE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED STRUCTURE, THE PERMIT MAY BE REVOKED BY NOTICE FROM THE COUNTY AND THAT THEN AND THERE IT SHALL BECOME NULL AND VOID. THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMT BASED UPON PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA SHALL NOT PREVENT THE BUILDING OFFICIAL FROM THEREAFTER REQUIRING THE CORRECTION OF ERRORS IN SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA OR FROM PREVENTING BUILDING OPERATION BEING CARRIED ON THEREUNDER WHEN IN VIOLATION OF THS CODE OR ANY OTHER ORDINANCE OR REGULATION OF THIS JURISDICTION. THE REVIEW OF SUBMITTED PUNS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND INSPECTIONS CONDUCTED THEREAFTER DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ACCEPTANCE OF ANY RESPONSIBILITIES OR LIABLITIES BY GARFIEID COUNTY FOR ERRORS, OMISSIONS OR DISCREPENCIES. THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THESE ITEMS AND IMPLEMENTATION DURING CONSTRUCTION RESTS SPECIFICIALLY WITH THE ARTICTECT, DESIGNER, BUILDER, AND OWNER. COMMENTS ARE INTENDED TO BE CONSERVATIVE AND IN SUPPORT OF THE OWNERS INTEREST. Gvrom.003 ( ///� 1 HEREDY AQC NOVjLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE AGREEMENT ABOVE (INITIAL): Cat�71b The following items are required by Garfield County for a final inspection: 1. A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector 2. Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department posted where readily visible from access road; 3. A finished roof, a lockable house, complete exterior siding, exterior doors and windows installed, a complete•kitchen with cabinets, a sink with hot & cold running water, non- absorbent kitchen floor coverings, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove and refrigerator, all necessary plumbing; 4. A complete bathroom, with washbowl, tub or shower, toilet stool, hot and cold running water, non-absorbent floors and walls finished and a privacy door; 5. All steps outside or inside over three (3) steps must have handrails, guard rails on balconies or decks over 30" high constructed to all 1997 UBC requirements; 6. Outside grading done to where water will detour away from the building; 7. Exceptions to the outside steps, decks and grading may be made upon the demonstration of extenuating circumstances, i.e. weather, but a Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until all the required items are completed and a final inspection made. A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. ****CANNOTOCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (C.O.) IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATING PREMISE UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET. I understand and agree to abide by the above conditions for occupancy, use and the issuance of a Certificate of Occupangg"for the dwelling under building permit# Signature BpcontO82002 i Daty/ Applicant, Address Date 7- VALUATION/FEE DETERMINATION Finished (Livable Area): Main Upper Lower Other Total Square Feet Valuation Basement: Unfinished Conversion of Unfinished to Finished Plan Check Fee for Conversion Valuation Garage: Crawl Space: Valuation Valuation Decks/Patios: Covered Valuation Open Valuation Total Valuation Subdivision [kit(' (h'a) SU If Lot/Block Lo+ 41(p (loi+3 (—to) Contractor B (6 1„ L • 5512. 3t/) eo 5 - *slit ------> Q914 - le.swa --41, (Ralf w 5 r44c-ir\Air X5113 9D11 b - Uni;#4 mss I n - Uri ( s 9a1g� 0!)314 rn 1iCACL ©033 Arise -. 6o 35 h'C lcA CA, • o631 rlflq , ca l- , - eff:5-3, litedx., sit at • yt gta ) b$1 _(mor* 4H Uni+ 2 : o031 A Ccrcle ni.fol o0 3 3 4Vlcse1 c& Circ U i�'3 _6035 ("Asti; ca Qiec(t - - 0037 iY1y_1ica Ctrc12, _3 - r' 2° 1111.c ;ca Circ �C 1237 4' 3)9 GAr.- .:%bd4r4 U *1. 63 :_oo'F1 knazlicb. C• rde... 4 j z 32- L rd1 ,4 3 )z 75P 7 Y sig - 45/7. ?SI— ��. „ /8 3z, 46 ZO1 -* /Z - 21iCa-fO -, Garfield County - Minimum Application Required: Commercial and Multi -Family Page 1 of 7 Garfield County, Colorado Search... HO41E ?ROUT CAI:FIELD COUNTY COUNTY SERVICES COUNTY GOVERNANCE COUNTY DEPAR Accounting Administration Airport Assessor Board of Commissioners Building & Planning ► Boards, Meetings & Agendas ► FAQ ► Comprehensive Plan of 2000 • Forms • Building Forms ► Code Violation Report Form / Driveway Permit Application ISDS Application Minimum Application Required: Commercial and Multi -Family ► Minimum Application Required: Manufactured Homes ► Minimum Application Required: SF Construction ► Owner's Agreement to Build Garage I. Sign Permit ► Planning Forms ► Land Use Code Updates ► Building Code Forms ► Code Enforcement ► Agricultural Buildings Defined ► Recreation Cabin Defined County Departments • Building & Planning • Forms • Building Forms • Minimum Application Required: Comm Multi -Family MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIRED: COMMERCIAL AND MULTI -FAMILY GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING 970-945-8212 MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF COMMERCIAL 013 MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS including NEW CONSTRUCTION ADDITIONS ALTERATIONS and MOVED BUILDINGS In order to understand the scope of the work intended under a permit application and expec issuance of a permit it is important that complete information be provided.Adequate and cor information will prevent delays in the plan review process.Reviewing a plan and the discove required information has not been provided by the applicant may result in the delay of the p issuance and in proceeding with building construction.The owner or contractor may be requ provide this information before the plan review may proceed.This causes delays because of that are in line for review may be given attention before the new information may be review( has been provided to the Building Department. Please review this document to determine if you have enough information to design project and provide adequate information to facilitate a plan review.lf you do not, it m helpful to obtain a book titled "Dwelling Construction Under the Uniform Building Co book is available to you through this department at our cost.Also, please consider u<_ design professional for assistance in your design and a construction professional fo construction of your project. To provide for a more understandable plan in order to determine compliance with the buildir plumbing and mechanical codes, applicants are requested to review the following checklist httn-//www aarfteld-rniinty rem/home/int-lex asn9naee=690 3/4/2004 Garfield County - Minimum Application Required: Commercial and Multi -Family Page 2 of 7 ► Demographics ► Consumer Price Index ► Geographic Information Services ► Zoning and Subdivision Regulations Clerk and Recorder Community Corrections County Engineer Geographic Information Services Human Resources Information Technology Landfill Oil and Gas Liaison Public Health Road and Bridge Sheriff Social Services Treasurer Vegetation Management Purchasing and during design. Plans to be included for a Building Permit must be on draft paper at least 18"x 24— a to scale. Plans must include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations all sides decks, balcony steps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the finish gn section showing in detail, from the bottom of the footing to the top of the roof, including re -b. bolts, pressure treated plates, floor joists, wall studs and spacing, insulation, sheeting, hous (which is required), siding or any approved building material. A window schedule.A door schedule. A floor framing plan, a roofing framing plan, roof must be designed to withstand a 40 pound square foot. up to 7,000 feet in elevation, an 80 M.P.H. windshear, wind exposure B, windlo pounds per square foot and a 36 inch frost depth. All sheets to be identified by number and indexed.All of the above requirements must be me plans will be retumed. All plans submitted must be incompliance with the 1997 UBC, UMC and 1997 UPC. Applicants are required to indicate appropriately and to submit completed checklist E application for a permit: 1.1s a site plan included that identifies the location of the proposed structure, additions or of buildings, setback easements, and utility easements showing distances to the property line: each comer of the proposed structure prepared by a licensed surveyor and has the surveyc signature and professional stamp on the drawing?Slopes of 30% or more on properties mu: show on site plan. NOTE: 106.3.1 (7.)Any site plan for the placement of any portion of a stn within 50 tt. of a property line and not within a previously surveyed building envelope on a s final plat shall be prepared by a licensed surveyor and have the surveyors signature and pn stamp on the drawing.Any structure to be built within a building envelope of a lot shown on recorded subdivision plat, shall include a copy of the building envelope as it is shown on the with the proposed structure located within the envelope. Yes 7 2.Does the site plan when applicable include the location of the I.S.D.S. (Individual Sewage System) and distances to the property lines, wells (on subject property and adjacent proper streams or water courses?This information must be certified by a licensed surveyor with the signature and professional stamp on the design. Yes No Not necessary for this project 3.Are the plans submitted for application review construction drawings and not drawings I stamped or marked identifying them as "Not for construction, for permit issuance only", "Apt drawings only, For permit issuance only or similar language? Yes / No Not necessary for this project 4.1s the I.S.D.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System) designed, stamped and signed by a Registered Engineer? Yes No Not necessary for this project 5.Does the site plan indicate the location and direction of the State, County or private road the property? kttn //uninv aarfield rnnnty rnm/hnme/index acn7nnae—t Qfl 3/4/2004 Garfield County - Minimum Application Required: Commercial and Multi -Family Page 3 of 7 Yes 6.Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all reinf steel in accordance with the uniform building code or per stamped engineered design? Yes / No Not necessary for this project 7.If the building is a pre-engineered structure, is there a stamped, signed engineered found for this building? Yes / No Not necessary for this project 8.Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl sp. the clearances required between wood and earth? Yes /No Not necessary for project 9.Do the plans indicate the size and location of the ventilation openings for the attic, roof joi and soffits? Yes / No Not necessary for this project 10.Do the plans include design loads as required under the Uniform Building Code tor roof snowloads, (a minimum of 40 pounds per square foot in Garfield County)? Yes / No Not necessary for this project 11.Do the plans include design loads as required for floor loads under the Uniform Building Chapter 16 and Tables 16A, 16B and 16C? Yes No Not necessary for this project 12.Does the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor, and ro construction? Yes //No Not necessary for this project 13.1s the wind speed and exposure design included in the plan? Yes No Not necessary for this project 14.Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists, wall studs, ceil roof rafters or joists or trusses? Yes , No Not necessary for this project 15.Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method of positive connecti columns and beams? Yes / No Not necessary for this project 16.Does the plan indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the highest pi building or addition measured at mid span between the ridge and the eave down to existing contours? hrrn•//www oarfiPhl-r nu.nty r nm/hnme/indlex asn7nave=690 3/4/2004 Garfield County - Minimum Application Required: Commercial and Multi -Family Page 4 of 7 Yes + No Not necessary for this project 17.Does the plan include any stove or zero clearance fireplace planned for installation inclu• make and model and Colorado Phase 11 certifications or Phase 11 EPA certification? Yes No Not necessary for this project V 18.Does the plan include a masonry fireplace including a fireplace section indicating design comply with the Uniform Building Code Chapter 31? Yes No Not necessary for this project r"/ 19.Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that egress/rescue windov sleeping rooms and/or basements comply with the requirements of the Uniform Building Co Yes / No Not necessary for this project 20.Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that windows provide natu and ventilation for all habitable rooms? Yes / No Not necessary for this project 21.Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass door immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as a wa surface; sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub enclosures and speci glazing for these areas? Yes / No Not necessary for this project 22.Do the plans include a complete design for all mechanical systems planned for installatir building? Yes No Not necessary for this project 23.Have all areas in the building been accurately identified for the intended use?(Occupanc identified in the Uniform Building Code Table 5-A) Yes No Not necessary for this project 24.Does the plan indicate the quantity, form, use and storage of any hazardous materials th in use in this building? Yes if No Not necessary for this project 25.1s the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas fumaces, boilers and water heaters on the plan? Yes / No Not necessary for this project 26.Do the plans indicate the location and dimension of restroom facilities and i1 more than fr employees and both sexes are employed, facilities for sexes? Yes "No Not necessary for this project 27.Do the plans indicate that restrooms and access to the building are handicapped access hrtn-//www oarfietd-rnnnty rnm/hnme/index acn7nape=690 3/4/2004 Garfield County - Minimum Application Required: Commercial and Multi -Family Page 5 of 7 Yes / No Not necessary for this project 28.Have two (2) complete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the applicatior Yes / No 29.Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other const code requirements? Yes / No Not necessary for this project 30.Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a fir inspection by the Garfield County Building Department? Yes '/ No 31.Do your plans comply with all zoning rules and regulations in the County related to your. district?For corner lots see supplemental section 5.05.03 in the Garfield County Zoning Res setbacks. Yes / No 32.Do you understand that approval for design and/or construction changes are required pr implementation of these changes? Yes /No 33.Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a "Plan Review" Tee from yo' time of application and that you will be required to pay the 'Permit' fee as well as any "Sept System" or "Road Impact fees required, at the time you pick up your building permit? Yes /No 34.Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the Uniform Code including approval on a final inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy < occupancy of the building? Yes No 35.Are you aware that the Permit Application must be signed by the Owner or a written autt given for an Agent and that the party responsible for the project must comply with the Unita Codes? Yes /No 36.Are you aware that twenty-four (24) hour notice is required for all inspections?Inst will be made from Battlement Mesa to West Glenwood in the mornings and from Gler Springs to Carbondale, in the afternoon.All inspections must be called in by 3:30 p.m before.Failure to give twenty-four (24) hour notice for inspections will delay your insr one (1) day.Inspections are to be called in to 384-5003. 37.Are you aware that requesting inspections on work that is not ready or not accessible r in a $47.00 inspection fee? Yes 38.Are you aware that prior to issuance of a building permit you are required to show proof htto•//www Barfield-countv com/home/index aso9oaee=690 3/4/2004 Garfield County - Minimum Application Required: Commercial and Multi -Family Page 6 of 7 driveway access permit or obtain a statement from the Garfield County Road & Bridge Depi stating one is not necessary?You can contact the Road & Bridge Department at 625-8601. Yes / No 39.Do you understand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed Electric Plumber to perform installations and hookups?The license number will be required at time c inspection. Yes No 40.Are you aware, that on the front of the building permit application you will need to fill in tt Schedule Number for the lot you are applying for this permit on prior to submittal of the buil( permit application?Your attention in this is appreciated. li Yes ,/ No I hereby acknowledge that I have read, understand, and answered these questions to the b ability. 5-AC SignatureDate 9P0' C23 • Phone: 555-" (days) ' Project Name: v� ���)�/J� a Project Address: A. -i , 211-4'01C-/l Note: If you answered "No" on any of these questions you may be required to provide this informw the request of the Building Official prior to beginning the plan review process.Delays in issui permit are to be expected.Work may not proceed without the issuance of the permit. 'If you have answered "Not necessary for this project" on any of the questions and it is dete the Building Official that the information is necessary to review the application and plans to minimum compliance with the adopted codes, please expect the following: A.The application may be placed behind more recent applications for building permits in the process and not reviewed until required information has been provided and the application 1 again to first position for review. B.Delay in issuance of the permit. C.Delay in proceeding with construction. ' If you answered "No' to this question the circumstances described in the question could re o Stop Work Order" being issued or a 'Certificate of Occupancy" not being issued. Bpcomm 04/2003 Home! About Garfield County 1 County Services 1 County Governance 1 County Departments 1 News 1 Quick Index 1 Site Map httn•//www varfield-cnnnty com/hnme/index asn9oaee=690 3/4/2004 Applican' PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST_J y£J Date 7- p,-91 Building ✓ngineered Foundation /E v Driveway Permit Surveyed Site Plan Septic Permit and Setbacks `_.--"Grade/Topography 30% —Attach Residential Plan Review List _�Ivlinimum Application Questionnaire ✓Subdivision Plat Notes ✓Fire Department Review Valuation Determination/Fees ./Red Line Plans/Stamps/Sticker –ttach Conditions —Application Signed Plan Reviewer To Sign Application ✓Parcel/Schedule No. ✓d0# Snowload Letter- Manf. Hms. GENERAL NOTES: Planning/Zoning Property Line Setbacks 30ft Stream Setbacks Flood Plain Building Height Zoning Sign -off Road Impact Fees ✓ HOA/DRC Approval Grade/Topography 40% Planning Issues Subdivision Plat Notes 03/26/2005 NON 7:50 FAX 9705230103 GRACE HOMES AccuStar Labs 0001/006 Page 1 of 1 Illus Ihdlr rdo Ptedals ind Result 'Waled las Ott * CJ Piehplonal dll h int > Testes Questions About Your Teat Wt Results? Belau we the resits cf your Radon Test Contact your local radon rntesve now Need to order more test tits? Go to our radon shoo now TisAddraess 0031 Anpdua ace Test Location First Floor Serial Number 250893 Result <0.4pCU1 Interpretation Your radon in at test resit 1s below the EPA's recommended action levet. Comments Get Results for another Radon Test Kut Enter Your Radon Ter KR Sena Number 125°693 • Print These Resits AccuStar Labs is not responsible for the consequences of any action taken or not taken based ui wported or any verbal or oaten Interpolation of the resits. A^^•Ster 0 MI Rights Reserved email 1Mcraiaarlabs.can http://www.accustsrlabs.cbin/teabtiwtilts_reply.php 03/28/2005 Mar 23 05 07:34a p.3 Ina Varner Sat aw ad e -aa -Ellet les. .sa.aeFlan.Dt. PS Coaa. Sam A (vn) Sams aa4rr.) ISMS Andy Schwaller Garfield County Building Department Fax: 970-384-3470 3-23-05 RE: Grace Homes Valley View Battlement, Mesa, 6-Plex at 0031 thru 0041 Angelica Circle. 1 Building Department: I have been retained by Grace Homes to provide engineering services for the above referenced project I have supervised inspection of the foundations prior to concrete placement to ensure conformance with the drawings that I prepared and were submitted for permit. I also verified placement of the foundation insulation material. The foundations are structurally adequate to satisfy the building codes currently adopted by Garfield County. Please contact me if there are any questions concerning this project Signed, Darren R. Adams, P. E. Andy, Grace Homes (Darter LLC) has paid all tap fees for the following addresses: Single Family Units: 15 Cliff View Place 26 Cliff View Place 35 Cliff View Place 255 Cliff View Circle Six-Plex: 37, 39, & 41 Angelica Circle Four-Plex: 111, 113, 117, & 119 Angelica Circle Water and sewer has been approved, and meters set for the following properties: 255 Cliff View Circle, 31, 33, 35, 37, 39, & 41 Angelica Circle 111, 113, 117, & 119 Angelica Circle Thanks Andy, tog ? :age.ot- Andy Schwaller From: David Blair, Chief, Grand Valley Fire Protection Dist. [gvfpd@sopris.net] Sent: Friday, July 30, 2004 3:44 PM To: Andy Schwaller Subject: Re: VVV & Grace Homes, conditional approval Andy, All fire hydrants are in, they have been randomly tested and approved. You may issue permits for construction along Angelica Circle or Valley View Drive, but no where else. David A. Blair Fire Chief, GVFPD --- Original Message --- From: Andy Schwaller To: David Blair Chief, Grand Valley Fire Protection Dist. Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2004 4:23 PM Subject: RE: VVV & Grace Homes, conditional approval Works for me. Thanks Andy Schwaller Building Official, Garfield County aschwafer@garfeld-county..com 970.945.8212 Original Message From: David Blair, Chief, Grand Valley Fire Protection Dist. [mailto:gvfpd@sopris.net] Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2004 3:39 PM To: Andy Schwaller Subject: WV & Grace Homes, conditional approval Andy, Per our phone conversation, July 27, 2004, 1536, the Grand Valley Fire Protection District does not have a problem with your office issuing a conditional permit to start the 6-plex project at Valley View Village. This conditional permit should specify, foundation only, no construction involving wood components. Thanks, David A. Blair, Fire Chief Grand Valley Fire Protection District 7/30/2004 Jul 16 2004 9:32AM LOWER VALLEY ENGINEERING (970) 858-2005 Lan Than restioiitnlin and Cbnn/ting. Inc. 5tructiral Prier, Imperils.. a,4 %mJIGa Sewe, for %nmercS .nd KeM ,UUj Rads iE3 alter Plum Detre Pruitt, Coude Ma Ph. Me) IPPRIMO Fe) Sflinel And Schwaller Garf eld County Building Department Fax: 70-384-3470 Re: ' race Homes Valley View Battlement Mesa 7-16 04 Mr. challer, 1 reviewed verified that the site for the 6-p/ex at 39 Angelica Circle has soils and c• acted subgrade fills that are capable of meeting the design requirements for the foun r ation and support of the structure. Sign d, R. Adams, P.E. Valley Engineering and Consulting, Inc. RECEIVED JUL 1 6 2004 GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING & PLANNING p.1 Ms. Diana Drussel, Grace Homes 786 Valley Ct. Grand Junction, CO. 81505 April 23, 2004 Garfield County BUILDING & PLANNING DEPARTMENT Re: Correction List -Building Permit Application -39 Angelica Circle Dear Ms. Drussel: Upon review of the application for the 6-plex at 39 Angelica, several areas will need to addressed. These areas are as follows: 1. As per Sec. 310.2.2 of the 97 UBC, occupancies having more than 3000 s.f. of floor area above the fust floor shall not be less than 1 hr. fire resistive construction throughout. This requirement will need to be added to the plans. 2. As per Sec. 1103.1.9.3 of the code, multi -unit buildings containing four or more dwellings must be built to the accessibility requirements for a Type B dwelling. This allows for the building to be properly sized and adaptable at construction without having to provide all the accessible features required of a Type A building. This requirement is not included with the submitted plans but I believe Bryan Sims is working on a solution. 3. Also redlined on the plans, are the requirements for the engineer of record to inspect the subgrade and foundation prior to the concrete being poured. A letter from the engineer will be required post inspection. 4. As per plat notes associated with the PUD, footer drains and radon testing is required. Both these requirements are noted on the plans. 5. Please verify if the listed and tested 1 hr. assemblies specified in the plans are compatible with the wood I -joist floor/ceiling construction shown. The specific I joist manufacturer's tested assemblies may need to be substituted with the assemblies shown on the plans. 6. The separation between the dwelling units required as per Sec. 310.2.2 must also continue through the access/egress stair well of the 2nd floor through the 151 floor. 7. The approved plans will have other corrections red -lined on the plans. With all the projects submitted utilizing the shallow frost protected foundations, an additional insulation inspection will be required prior to backfill to verify the rigid insulation is installed properly as per Sec R403.3 of the 2003 IRC. This inspection can be done by the county inspectors or the engineer of record for the project. 108 8th Street, Suite 201, Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 (970) 945-8212 (970) 285-7972 Fax: (970) 384-3470 Please call if you have any questions. I will continue with the plan review while waiting for the required submittals. Sincerely, AtndrewSohwalier Building Official FAX Number of Pages: 2 Date: 1 -rJfl - o q TO: 14¢14 14w&Sic (including this cover sheet) FROM: FAX #: Comments: Garfield County Building & Planning Department 108 8th Street, Suite 201 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 (970) 945-8212 Fax # (970) 384-3470 e. Garfield County BUILDING & PLANNING DEPARTMENT Ms. Diana Drussel, Grace Homes 786 Valley Ct. Grand Junction, CO. 81505 April 28, 2004 Via fax with hardcopy to follow. Dear Ms. Drussel: Site visits by county personnel over the past several weeks has revealed a potential problem related to the subgrade under some of the proposed building sites. It would appear that fill material is being placed without adequate compaction to support the future buildings. It has been reported that fill depths of 10 feet have been placed without being compacted or tested to see if adequate compaction has been achieved. Also the fill material may not be of a structural nature. It was reported that topsoil with organic material was used in some locations. The problem this presents is possible structural failure of the foundation and buildings or movement that would render the buildings unsafe to occupy. This type of settlement could occur months after completion of the structures. We are requesting the engineer of record review the proposed building sites to address these concerns. A sealed letter from the engineer will be required verifying the fills are constructed in a way to support the designed loads of the buildings. We will continue with the plan reviews, but permits will not be issued until the condition of the subgrade is known. Thank you for your time with this matter. Please call if you have any questions. Andrew Schwaller Building Official 108 8th Street, Suite 201, Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 /071)) OAS 2117 mom 10[ ono? 1- ,nom^• ^^ • •- RECEIVEWCLIVI- . APR 1 5 2004 APR 1 a 1004 GARFIELD COUNTNyl�pwr & COUNI BUILDING & PLANNIry Andy Schwaller Chief Building Official Garfield County Building & Planning Dept. 108 8th Street, Suite 201 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Homes REAL ESTATE & CONSTRUCTION • Quality • Value • Integrity 12 -Apr -2004 Dear Andy, Enclosed you will find the revised elevations and the foundation plan to match with the information you required on the plans. Please advise me if we can have our permit now. If you need other information or have questions please call me, Diana, at (970) 523-5555. Than {Cou. • lCA T/4/114 Respectfully, Diana Drussel Administrative Assistant 786 Valley Court • Grand Junction, Colorado 81505 Office (970) 523-5555 • Fax (970) 523-0103 04/15/2004 THU 11:06 FAX ocavo APR 1 y t004 FAX COVER SHEET Grace Homes Real Estate and Construction Inc. 786 Valley Court Grand Junction. CO 81505 (970) 523-5555 (970) 523-0103 10001/002 Sandhi: ALIN CC un:di 1Z From: 'I>i , aSenn oukt ce 8T P) Date: 4^-i‘rOF Pages: (inducing cover) 3. Office Location: Grand Junction, CO Fac Number q io -3 84 - 34 ---to Phone Number ber: (9710) 5233555 Urgent . Reply ASAP Please Comment Review Yourtnfomndlion Conisetic RE: � y U (E� �%i u �4Cn f=' a - -�{ . * 6 pike -V-€5 i rlfo,r matt. o -•►t coo u� J' 04/15/2004 THIw 11:08 FAX c6-04 09:54 AM PADS.ARCHI7ECTS 9702411903 e: Grace Homes Valley View Settlement Mama Mardi 24, 2004 Is Grace Attend ME Grand J Hunt Des 917 •I Grand -%•T Youaro These Department a. • 1. 2. In vol $ nos, Developer/ Contractor • Consbutllon Division Court notion, CO 81504 Specialists, P.C.. Architects & Planner Street Junction, CO 81501 10002/002 P. 02 to make the foiolwg dirges In the construction of the referenced project are In respect to directives received from the Garfield Carty Baling communicated to this office by the Being Inspector, Andy Schweller. entry dais and frames between the garage and living areas of the 4-plex and 0. unix are required to be 1 -hour. We recommend- a hollow metal door, said with steel frame. 598 -Inch type 'X' drywall Is to be used on bot sides 01 walls Ping and garage areas to maintain ail -hour barrier. units where garage Is not heated, R-19 Insulation banter Is to be used the garage and Owing areas. On the 8-plsx, this Includes to wiling of me storage. and sidewalks at axterbr exposure. Where storage rooms occur garage and exterior, use 5J8-Pidt type 'X' drywall on Nestor of storage R-19 Barrier on exterior walls of storage. Insulation not required in walls of areas that an a4sosnt to the garage Interiors. 3. If French there are to be installed on the the buIdingS, see attached 1/AD-I and 8/A8 on 0-piax plans, For drain location, sea site and grading s. 4. 1 rior separation wall betwsen garages are to be 1 -hour construction VIM m mum of R-13 between Individual units. 5. A. fond perimeter foundation Instdalion Is to be Installed where Indicated on the rel drawings. Sea Sin,durd Construction Drawings for location. to grades on the site, steps wit be required in the foundations end rooftin es. steps we site spedfle to be addressed In the Architect's is and Structural s design documents. H required, addensjm s WS be Issued to the by the Architect and/or Engineer of record to address site specific 917 Yaln Sire t • Grand Junction, Colorado mei • (970J 241-1901 04/01/2004 THU 09:59 FAX 1 MRR.30.200d 1159PM BATTLEMENT DESA CO BATrLEMENr' MESA SERVICE ASSOCIATION ARCHITECTURAL COQ APPLICATION & CSECKKLLST (for New Rome Construction projects) Pp.022 W1002/007 P.1 Homeowner: AV ter .a. RP, 4- e...Q. Ate-- C HomeMaiingAddress a& /1//e4.A- 4) CQ lir,6,CHome Phone: — 1 WotkPhone(dS&I): 4 70 , sa-3. 2666 Project Addrese at:, i Bi e t: A Subdivision: ViPid aaffi € ProductionHomaPlanN (3fepplicab1e): (o- rise._ U.0;46 A - r Homebotder. Business Mmling Address: Business Phone: Ira . 23 . Fax(ifdesired): SubtaittalDate: EstimatedStattDatc EstiosnedCompietionDate: SUBMITTAL REQYri NTS: Two Copies each of items 1, 2 & 4 need to be submitted (Check-offitems attached to the Application, FM in spaces as indicated.) ►� 1. Site Plan Drawing (1" = 10' or 1" = 20' scale) with the following information shown: Lo; Bbek & Subdivision name. Street Address of Project. Building Setback Lines (also 5h1 -M the shortest distance between property lane to the exterior wall closest to that property line). Please be aware that all Building Setback Lines are taken from your Property Line Pins!! Your Property Line is NOT the Curb Line!! Dwelling Unit Garage Front Setback: <. ' _o Left Right Setback: ightSidetback:20 q • a51 9 Rear Setback: 00' _ `r ./ Utility Easements. 55' Cleat Site -Line at Intersection Cotter Lots. Site Grading Elevations & Drainage. !7- First (main) Floor Height is relation to top of street curb at front -center of lot. Driveways (mohsdsog width of driveway), Walkways, Patios, etc. r� Outbuildings. Page 2 of 6 04/01/2004 THU 10.00 FAX 'MFR.30.2004 1:59PM BATTLEMENT MESA CO NO. e72 1t003/007 P.2 2. Architectural Drawings (1/4" =1' or VS" =1' scale) with the followkp infoImation shown. Floor Plmt(s) with overall dimensions (fill-in the foDowiag square foot areas). First Floor Finished Living Area: Second Floor Fiaisbed Living Area: Lower Floor Finished Living Area: Total Finished Living Area: 41/74/ square feet Wo/P... square bet square fent 7I a L square feet Total 1.1nfmished Living Area: —.figure feet Garage Arm: 11442 feet of 4= //a '1/> Building Elevations Plats indicating doon, a►hsdows, exterior materials, building height,. roof pitch, rooSmom ted evaporative codas, eta (till -in maximum height below). Mivitoym building belga to highest ridge line or building structural projection a� feat above top of street curb at front anter of your lot. ✓/ Engineered (stamped) Foundation Nan Outbuildings indicating dimensions, elevations and ovasd hsight to ridge line. J 3. Exterior Materials (fill the selections below): � ben cat ma ✓ RtofmalateriaL•�bt 1411144.Y,I+tscoior. ,Lir.SCt&( A J) ✓ Primary girfmera J%t C a e r(I pr f Color / Accent SidingMaieria1 AI epsts�/e 1/191 Color: un. trC TrimMaterial: jYH tt-.ASL Vinyl Coin-. fat nit' _NS Masonry Material: -- Color: tJA StuccoMatcialt — Color Front Door Material: gaP14d.t. Color: tvsrira Garage DoorMeterisl' tam.- Color. tutanyLr' COLOR SAMPLE COLOR. SAMPLE COLOR SAMPLE COLOR SAMPLE COLOR SAMPLE - COLOR SAMPLE Page 3 of 6 R4/01/2004 THU 10:00 FAX P1 4004 /007 '• 30.2004 1: 59P BATTLEMENT NESS co NO.022 P.3 4. Lamiscapea+rigntion Pleas with the following informatiom: Planting Plan (indicate areas of irrigated lawn, tree placement, dub beds, ground cove, y eta). Alai Material listing by species of trees. 'dribs and grasses. _� _ , Orotmdcover Material with weed control beaiet. ___ _ Fences. Other Landscape Improvements (decks, site lighting, flag poles, etc.).5 10. kftt tt.emktdeci, _Au_ 5. Variance Request (if applicable) Give details below: jjc, ads � B 6 ResidentJal Construction Monetary Deposit: D/J Diactieat T I/We herby acknowledge and understand that ourW here to complete Home ConsQaction, Improvement Projeeu or Landscaping Construction within the time constraints noted in Conditions 2. & 3. On Page 6 of thb Application will moult in a Notice and Opportunity for a Hearing before the BMSA Board of Directors. If I/We are found in violation of dime Conditions at the Hearing it will result in a fine to the Owner of not las than SS00,00 permonth for each i5r11 month in excess of the allotted completion time fin I/Wehereby aclmowledge that Rome Construction or Improvement Projects orLandscape Constrnetbn features which sre built in non-conformance with this full application, including the Conditions of Approval noted on Page 6 of 6 herein, Me will be cited by the BMSA/AC in written dation form at the time of discovery. In extenuating circumstances a Variance may be requested from the BMSA/AC, provided such Variance request Item is within the purview and approval jurisdiction of the BMSA/AC. If a Variance is not granted by the BMSA/AC and if the Non -Conforming Items are not corrected within 60 days after the date of written citation, Me will be served Notice of a Hearing before the BMSABoard of Directors, and if I/We are found in violation of these Non -Conforming Items at the Hearing We wi be fined a.minimum of 5500.00 per Non -Conforming Item. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Me acknowledge that the BMSA Board of Directors and/or Architectural Committee may pursue any !egal remedy available in the event of m non-compliance. Page 4 of 6 04/01/2004 THO 10:00 FAX IW.30.2004 1;59PM BATTLEMENT MESA CO 110.022 W1005/007 P.4 Failure to pay fines levied as determined at the Hearing may also result in a Lim being placed oa your Property or litigation Process initiated by the BM5A Bond of Directors to secure conformance with this fall Application and its respective Conditions Of Approval. I/We understand thetArcbitectursl Committee approval does not constitute approval of the local b uildbag department, drainage design or structural soundness, nor does it constitute assurance that the plans comply with all applicable codes, regulations, ordinances and laws. We farther acknowledge that any subsequent field changes which I/We may desire to the Home Construction or Improvement Projects of this original Application Submittal and the original Conditions of Approval toed by the BMSA/AC will require an additional Revised Application Submittal on our behalf, and that I/We will not proceed with any subsequent field changes until a Revised Conditions of Approval have been issued to to by the BMSA/AC. Ovine( s Signanre(s): 1 La4:4_ 0E4E6- L&7nrC P7 4 [ nsze Its iyo Owoer'sPrintedNames: hula /Vu_JJ - ord Dec: 40160/94 - Date: Builder's Signature: t t-41.u.c, IOA.aoatJ 'Rigida- / (d - shot* brucgat aa,,, P.R. ' Date: e/a 1 BuU¢ersPrinted Name: Page 5 of 6 04/01/2004 TBI 10:01 FAX MAR.30.2004 1:59PM BATTLEMENT MESA CO N0.022 This portion of the Application Form is to be completed by the Architectural Committee (not the Applicant). CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL or DISAPPROVAL 141000/007 P.5 t. No sitework or building construction may proceed on any Lot (including no preliminary site cleating, ;subbing, trade alteretiora, storing ofmaierial, foundation excavation, extension oftmderground utilities, etc,) until the Project bas received a Project approval from the Architectural Committee and bas been issued a Building Pencil (as required by Garfield County for new home or Renovation projects). 2. All general building and site improvements construction for any Project shell be completed and aball have issued a Certificate of Occupancy torn rbe Garfield County Building Department no lata than one (11 mar atter the Sumer date of this Lrahitectural Corffirittet Anvmond. - 3. The complete landscaping and revegetatian ofthe improved Lot, to specifically %elude the bat, d and rex yard areas, shall be completed no lata than sur (6) mouths from the date of the Certificate of Occupancy, 4. If the selection of colors and /or landscaping plans as not included with this application they must be - suhmitted for approval before any action is taken to iastaa the misting items. 5. P4Je ,4+- l! � � /fl AVICF,^!cc= X �1 0_^1- eve c✓l�ii �eCoU / /-✓ c4A. I/1 N7 L j2 fl0 ffetAyst154 6. 7. 4'u- feet me.A., G 1-0 (/tot `rt -rot Fart i(>"- sCsi Application Approval r* of Archfa Committee Members): By: � Application Approved Coustr action subject to the above conditions: By Chairman: Application Denied (Initials of Arcbitecturd Committee Members): By. �.? oy Application Denied for reasoe(s) stated above: By Chairman: Gate: Page 6 of 6 04/01/2004 THU 10.01 FAX MAA.30.2204 1159PM BATTLEMENT MESA CO /C.022 P.6 cool? ten. l r4,..i P. �cwarowaud RevF (', i 64d ? &nod* letwi t ® 14A -I NA-st BATTLEMENT MESA SERVICE ASSOCIATION ARCHITECTURAL COIVIHIIT1TrE APPLICATION SUBMIT7AJ. FORM (For New Home Construction) INSTRUCTIONS: 10007/007 This Application & Checklist is to be used for all project submittals to the Battlement Mesa Service Association Azohitectral Committee (BMSA/AC). This form is inter to assist in ensuring that the application submittal is complete. Thin will help provide a quicker, more thorough review process. It is recotlDreaded that each Applies= thoroughly review the regtdranents of the mums Architectural Standards, the Amended and Restatedieclaradou of Covenants (bxttiq nsResolatdons)andtherecorded Final Plat for their respective neighborhood prior to preparing a submittal. Applicants preparing a sultmittal should compere the information they arc about to submit with the requirements ofthis form and "check of each required Reason the form Nam ;semis not checked, the Application submittal is not complete and should not be submitted. Incomplete App&atioas will not be processed and nil be returned to the Applicant. In Witt to the checklist, Appliotats should till in all of the places on the ApplieabonForm where information is requested TheAtchitecturalCaimettteewllusethisiafonuationiaevaluatingYowApplcation. Ifmformation is requested but is int applicable to your specific project submittal, write "Ng in the space provided. If some required information is yet to be determined (such as exterior pairs colon you may not have yet 'elected) write a CBD" in the appropriated space provided You will then be required to make a follow-up sine withthee mleQdons at a later date but before installation in the home. DO NOT till in any information in the "Cooditioris for Approver section of this form. The portioa of the form is far Architectural Committee use only. Whet an Application is complete, please mail or deliver it to the following address: 13attkemeut Mesa Service Association Archtechual Committee Application 73-0 Sippre&e Drive P.O. Box 6006 Battlement Mesa, Colorado 81636 The Architectural Committee meets twice monthly on the 14 and 3A Wednesdav, end Applications are dna one week prior to the Scheduled Meeting Dates for prior review by Committee members. Please contact Jame Chapman at (970) 28S-9740 to confirm the non scheduled meeting date or to request further inhumation. We thank you in advance for your cooperation and in complying with the Architectural Standards of the Battlement Mesa Service Association. Page 1 of 6 03/30/2001 TUE 12:23 FAX htl 003/023 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL August 12, 2003 Grace Homes. Inc. Attn: Terry Lawrence 786 Valley Court Grand Junction, Colorado 81505 Hepworrn-Paedlak Geuteehnipl. Int. 5020 County Road 154 Glenwood Spring.. Colorado b1601 !'tern. 970-915-7988 F9a 970-945.8154 ana�i h9re491cacrAIS"01 Job No. 102 )26 Subject: Clarification of Foundation Drain Recommendations, Proposed Valley View Village, Parcels 2-5 and 2-6, Batdet Mesa, Garfield County, Colorado. Dear Mr. Iawrelace: As requested, we have reviewed our preliminary geotechnical report dared 5eprember 16.2002 and discussed the findings of the Colorado Geological Survey (CGS) report by Sean Gaffney dated April 28.2003 with respect to foundation dram requirements at the project site. The CGS has stated that they are in general agree ne t with our uadcrdrain system recommendations. The geotechnical exploration generally identified a two layered subsurface profile, the upper layer being sandy silty slay loess and alluvial fan deposits overlying thud flow cobbles and boulders in a sandy clay matrix. The upper clay soils and underlying mod flow deposits were found to be suitable for support of spread footings. There may be a need to desigd the footings fot' a minor to low expansion potential but it bas been our experience in Battlement Mesa that because of the high basalt rock content, the potential for foundation heave is low and tolerable for lightly loaded spread footings. The heave potential of the subsoils will be evaluated on a site specific basis for the building fuuadation desig,,. Foundation drains are recommended to protect subsurface building areas against hydrostatic pressure buildup and wilting at the below grade level. In imminent areas and with retaining walls, an rmderdrafn is needed since hydrostatic pressures at that depth could have damaging structural impacts to the walls. Where the subsoils have minor to low potential for collapse or heave, it has beefl experience in Battlement Mesa that underdrains are not needed around shallow (no to about 3 feet deep) f0 d' flb slabs constructed near site grade or for crawlspaees. Compacted clay backfill w positive surface drainage will adequately protect the bearing soils without a foundation drain. The need for a perimeter foundation drain is normally considered in the site specific geotechnical study for design level recommendations apd should be included on the engineered fotmdation design Parker 303-841-7119 • Colorado Springs 719.633=5562 • Silverthume 970-468-1989 03/30/2004 171E 12:23 FAX 40004/023 Grace Homes, Inc. August 12, 2003 Page 2 If you have any questions, or require further assistance, please contact our office. Sincerely, HEPWORTH-PAWLAK INC. Steven L. Pawlak, P.E. SLP/rso cc: High Country Land Design Partnership - Attn: Ron Liston on Weidler 1!1 -In'(3 -- > 3obo_ F. -ca 1m C"sA j ._ 27 .c io __act__ Lo°I,2,1,1 _ c_ .i AstrimpThm, Titu.} Ata g3 oC.c F y S.c,._ 0 /. 5; (2. crfruAsor ►tet .13L - Li,tilat 2981 :11.0 2 1 25 )314 `1iii Ah 242- -. Gift _l3548 VJ i -Int& _ 210 S- 2 (o1 d- - 90 _ c& 24072 - - 319 1 626 GRti 1? -- 1 tvtir - Krr / 13.14 r•r Lr�ita : 3.sc. _ 4.3$ 0.4. zLit g astir 2 /358 = 4.53 o.0 14* Com. 12 ao s f.. 1134 S.F. 12W SF /2.32 Trot 4/144- leaf' ?at3.sc Id 2 + G ra % ! 0 'YeWJ 479(0 iT)tleitri r 4835— by 1.'744_ /6 at. cL0wsne.a ..302-r 141,7_1n Q?m j i4 ...310 .- b 2 swirl.,ao 6033V_IOJI. .504 x' 4 2#,t 9 -� --7;-c s- %Hit .rr D. ... 70E D c4)-,.a-vA S7.c, 70g. 3. Z/. 3 ;:!P►{ ° 10 /PtacuA z < /0 ac A . nun4 //�r 1.. L Cf i Atue 145.5.3. ( #4c. 2. ��c 310,22 S ��d��� Jan 13 04 05:19p January 13, 2004 gvfpd 9702859746 GRAND VALLEY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 1777 S. BATTLEMENT PARKWAY PO BOX 295 PARACHUTE, CO 81635 (970) 285-9119, FAX (970) 285-9748 Mark Bean Garfield County Buildmg and Planning Department 108 8t' Street, Suite 201 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 p.2 Ju,act,, Subject: Temporary Fire Protection requirements for initial construction activities at the Valley View Village Mr. Bean, 1 met this morning with Mr. Bruce South, Battlement Mesa Consolidated Metro District and discussed some of the District's concerns regarding use of the aura+tt Battement Mesa fire protection hydrant system. He assures me that the Project owner is an approved user of the system and has all rights to the water in the event of a fire emergency. Therefore, the requirements of the Grand Valley Fire Protection District will be in accordance with the 1997 Uniform Fire Code and more specifically include: PART 111- GENERAL PROVISIONS FOR SAFETY ARTICLE 9 - FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS AND WATER SUPPLY Section 901 - General 901.2.2 Plans 901.12.1 Fire apparatus access. Plans for fire apparatus access roads shall be submitted to the fire department for review and approval prior to construction. 901.2.21 Fire hydrant systan. Plans and specifications for fire hydrant systems, including the use and placement of above stored water tanks, shall be submitted to the fire department for review and approval prior to ca tntction. 901.3 Timing of Installation. When fire protection, including fire apparatus access roads and water supplies for fire protection, is required to be installed, such protection shall be installed and made serviceable to and during the time of oonstnrcton. EXCEPTION. When altercate methods of protection, as approved, are provided, the requirements of Section ial may be modified or waived. Pirl Approved modifications include: o Use of the existing Battlemau Mesa fire protection hydrant system for homes, requiring a fire flow of less than 1,750 gpm, build within 250 feet of an existing hydrant, as per Appendix 111-B. Structures requiring more than the 1,750 gpm, will need to augment the additional fire flow requirements with an auxiliary water source. o Above ground stored water tanks, not to contain Tess than 2,500 gallons each, located at each building site, as per concur District requirements for construction and on-going fire protection in the urban -interface area. Homes that are being constructed adjacent to each other can use a 5,000 gallon, shared water supply. • All above ground stored water tanks will be located within 6 feet of an approved fire apparatus access road (temporary included) as described in Section 902 - FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS. c.t1,f .9 Fru.. ) eA) gine V 1 Jan 13 04 05:20p gvfpd 9702859748 • All above ground stored war tanks will have an outlet connection of 4 W', National Hose thread, with a tow control valve located between the connection and tank. • The supply piping to the outlet connection will not be less than 6" in diameter. • The above ground stored water supply tank will need to be provided with frieze protection of both the tank aad piping. o Section 902 - FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS o Section 902.2 - Fue Apparatus Access Roads. • Dimension - unobstructed width of not less than 20 feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches. • Surface - Fire apparatus access roads shall be designed and mamtained to support the unposed loads of fire apparatus and shall be provided with a surface so as to provide all-weather driving capabilities. (Roads shall be designed to support the District's largest potential responding unit - 54,000 lbs.) • Turning radius - The turning radius of a fire apparatus access road shall be as approved. • Dead -ends - Dead-end fire apparatus access roads shall be provided with an approved provision for turning around of fire apparatus. • Obstruction and control of fire apparatus access - The required width of a fire apparaws access road, and space in front of an above stored water supply tank, shall not be obstructed in any manner, including parking of vehicles Minimum required widths and clearances will established under Section 902.2.2 I shall be maintained at all times. When the above requirements have been met, the Grand Valley Fire Protection District will recommend issuance of building permits for home construction. These fire protection requirements are not required for under ground infrastructure installaticm. if you have any questions regarding these requirements, I can be reached at 285-9119. or 250-9851. David A. Blair District Fire Chief, GVFPD Cc: Board of Directors, GVFPD P/BMVFD Fire Chief, Gary Mahaffey Battlement Mesa Metro District, Bruce Smith High Country Engineering, Ronald Wedler File A 4 c 0T- al p.3 Garfield County Building and Planning Department Attn: Andrew Schwaller, Building Official 108 Street, Suite 201 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Re: Grace Homes Valley View at Battlement Mesa Buildings at Angelica Circle Dear Mr. Schwaller, Re: Valley View May 4, 2004 We have had several discussions conceming this project pertaining to the Building Code: '97-1103 pertaining to accessibility. The access street, Angelica Circle has a vertical elevation rise of over 30 feet for approximately 500 feet at the Eastem side of the site. This difference in elevation necessitates a vertical drop in the access -way to the units in this area which typically exceeds 30 inches. This change in elevation is documented on the grading plans created by High Country Engineering of Glenwood who is responsible for the site grading and drainage engineering. This difference in grade allows exception in reference to Section 1103.1.9.3-5.1 & 5.2. We are, however, providing type 'B' accessible units as required in the West portion of Angelica Circle which meet those requirements as required by code. Thank you for your attention and indulgence in this matter. Sincerely, ect cialists, P.C. cc: Grace Homes, Attn: Darin Carei 917 Main Street RECEIVED MAY 0 a 2004 GARFIELD COON i Y BUILDING & PLANNING Grand .Iuertine. Cnlnradn R15n1 (Q7111 741-1903 Yeh and Associates, Inc. Geotechnical Engineering Consultants 5700 E. Evans Avenue Denver, CO 80222 Tel.: (303) 181-9590 Fax: (303)781-9583 April 29, 2004 Mr. Darin Carei Darter, LLC 786 Valley Court Grand Junction, Colorado 81505 420 Seventh Street, Suite 100 Gknwmd Springa, CO 81601 Tel: (970)384-1500 Fax: (970) 384-1501 Proposal No. 2004-P112 Subject: Proposal for Geotechnical Engineering Study, Valley View Village PUD, Phase A, Battlement Mesa, Garfield County, Colorado Dear Mx. Carei: This letter presents Yeh and Associates, Inc. proposed scope of work and estimated project costs for preparation of a geotechnical study for the subject project. Project Description: The project includes subdivision of a parcel of land for residential housing, construction of utilities and roadways. We were provided with a geotechnical report by HP Geotech for the infrastructure and a site -grading plan by High Country Engineers. The client requires a geotechnical study for the proposed structures to be constructed on the property. Scope of Work: Based on the information provided to us, additional results of field investigation to be performed, and our understanding of the project, we propose the following scope of work for the completion of a geotechnical study. 1. Contract drilling or excavation services for the investigation. This estimate assumes that the client will provide excavation equipment for the test pits. 2. Provide laboratory testing services. 3. Excavate and sample between 12 and 16 borings or test pits at the proposed site. The total number of borings will be determined in the field. Analyze the field data and laboratory test results from the investigation and all pertinent data obtained. Based on this data we will provide a report with recommendations and geotechnical considerations for the following: • An assessment of the groundwater conditions and recommendations for surface and subsurface drainage considerations. • Recommended foundation types and design criteria based on the site and subsurface conditions. • Lateral earth pressures for foundation walls. • Corrosive potential, if any, of soils on concrete. • Backfill soil type and degree of compaction and suitability of on-site soils for use on the project. RECEWED Foundation construction criteria. A slope stability evaluation and recommendations for mitigation of the potential MAY 05 2004 slope hazard. GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING 8 PLANNING 4. We will observe and document site-specific foundation conditions at the time of excavation for each of the 11 planned structures. Our estimate is based on 3 hours per site for the 11 sites. Contact drilling or excavation services (Task #1) if needed, will be charged at cost plus 15%. The client will be invoiced in accordance with the attached Standard Fee Schedule and General Conditions for all other work. We estimate the following approximate costs for the project: Task 1 (Excavation) Task 2 (Lab) Task 3 (Report) Task 4 (Observation) Mileage and Other Direct Costs Estimated Costs If you have any questions, please feel free to call. Sincerely, Yeh and Assoc Roger Pihl P.G. Principal Attachment: Fee Schedule General Conditions cc: Ronald Weidlet, High Country Engineering $ 0 $ 1,500 $ 3,850 $ 2,200 $ 100 $ 7,650 Accepted by. Date: (return by fax to 970-384-1501) wll Z (y6 HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. September 16, 2002 Grace Homes, Inc. Attn: Terry Lawrence 786 Valley Court Grand Junction, Colorado 81505 Job No. 102 526 Subject: Report Transmittal, Preliminary Geotechnical Study, Proposed Roan Cliff Village Development, Parcels 2-5 and 2-6, Battlement Mesa, Garfield County, Colorado Dear Mr. Lawrence: As requested, we have conducted a preliminary geotechnical study for the proposed subdivision development. The site is suitable for the proposed development based on geologic and geotechnical conditions. Conditions that could cause constraints to the development are discussed in the report. Subsurface conditions encountered in the exploratory borings drilled at the site, below about 'h foot of topsoil, consist of nil to 171 feet of very stiff, silty sandy clay overlying relatively dense basalt fragments up to boulder size in a sandy clay matrix. Groundwater was not encountered in the borings and the soils were slightly moist to moist with depth. Bearing conditions throughout the site varied. Spread footings placed on the natural subsoils and designed for an allowable bearing pressure of 1,500 psf to 3,000 psf appear suitable for building support. Building sites with expansive clay may need the footings to be designed for a minimum dead load or the clay removed to exposed the granular subsoils. The report which follows describes our exploration, summarizes our findings, and presents our recommendations suitable for planning and preliminary design. It is important that we provide consultation during design, and field services during construction to review and monitor the implementation of the geotechnical recommendations. If you have any questions regarding this report, please contact us. Sincerely, HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. (“2.(2._ Trevor L. Knell Rev. by: SLP TLK/djb TABLE OF CONTENTS PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY 1 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 1 SITE CONDITIONS 2 GEOLOGIC CONDITIONS 2 FIELD EXPLORATION 3 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 3 PRELIMINARY DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS 4 FOUNDATIONS - 5 FLOOR SLABS 5 UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM 5 SURFACE DRAINAGE 6 PAVEMENT SECTION THICKNESS 6 LIMITATIONS 7 FIGURE 1 - LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIGURE 2 - 3 - LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIGURE 4 - 7 - SWELL -CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS FIGURE 8 - GRADATION TEST RESULTS TABLE I - SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS H -P GEOTECH PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY This report presents the results of a preliminary geotechnical study for the proposed Roan Cliff Village development to be located on Parcels 2-5 and 2-6, Battlement Mesa, Garfield County, Colorado. The project site is shown on Fig. 1. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the geologic and subsurface conditions and their potential impact on the project. The study was conducted in accordance with our proposal for geotechnical engineering services to Grace Homes, Inc., dated July 1, 2002. A field exploration program consisting of exploratory borings was conducted to obtain information on the subsurface conditions. Samples of the subsoils obtained during the field exploration were tested in the laboratory to determine their classification, compressibility or swell and other engineering characteristics. The results of the field exploration and laboratory testing were analyzed to develop recommendations for project planning and preliminary design. This report summarizes the data obtained during this study and presents our conclusions and recommendations based on the proposed development and subsurface conditions encountered. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The proposed development will consist of mixed use residential and commercial structures. The commercial portion of the development (Lots 84 to 90) will be located in the northeast portion of the site and 83 residential lots will be located to the south of the drainage gully as shown on Fig. 1. We assume buildings will be typical of the area and consist of one to two stories of wood frame construction on slab -on -grade or over a crawlspace or partial basement. We expect foundation loadings will be relatively light. Entrances to the development will be located along West Battlement Parkway and Stone Quarry Road. Private driveways will access the lots from newly constructed interior H -P GEOTECH -2 - roads. Commercial buildings will have slab -on -grade floors. The development will be serviced with municipal water and sewer systems. If development plans change significantly from those described, we should be notified to re-evaluate the recommendations presented in this report. SITE CONDITIONS The site is currently occupied by a ranching operation with related structures and pastures located on approximately 40 acres at the southwest corner of West Battlement Parkway and Stone Quarry Road. The existing residence appears to be abandoned. Several utility easements and dry irrigation ditches transect the property. The ground surface is mostly flat to gently rolling. A deeply incised drainage gully is located in the northeastern third of the site. The gully was dry at the time of our field exploration. Grades range between 5 and 10 percent and generally slope down to the northwest in the proposed building areas. The side slopes of the gully are steep. Vegetation consists of sparse grass in the pastures with brush and sagebrush on the slopes of the drainage and along the north property line. Some mature trees are located near the existing structures north of the drainage. GEOLOGIC CONDITIONS The general site geology at the Battlement Mesa Project Area was observed and described in a preliminary subsoil and geologic study by Chen & Associates, Job No. 11,833 dated January 16, 1975. Parcels 2-5 and 2-6 are situated on the western portion of the Battlement Creek alluvial fan which is composed of interlayered mudflow and alluvial sediments. Deposition of the fan began during late Quaternary time. During this time, climatic conditions were quite varied resulting in alluvial deposition along historic drainages during fairly dry periods and mudflow depositions during wet periods. H -P GEOrECH -3 - The mudflow deposits are characterized by a heterogeneous mixture of gravel, cobbles and boulders embedded in a sandy clay matrix. The alluvial sediments are generally more stratified and usually show some degree of sorting. The upper clays are wind blown deposits and alluvial soils derived from reworking of the mudflow deposits by recent and Holocene streams. Bedrock underlying this site is the Eocene Wasatch Formation. Bedrock was not encountered in any of the exploratory borings drilled during the current study and was encountered deeper than 100 feet in other parts of the Battlement Mesa area in borings drilled for previous geotechnical studies. FIELD EXPLORATION The field exploration for the project was conducted on August 20 and 21, 2002. Eight exploratory borings were drilled at the locations shown on Fig. 1 to evaluate the subsurface conditions. The borings were advanced with 4 -inch diameter continuous flight auger powered by a truck -mounted CME -45B drill rig. The borings were logged by a representative of Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. Samples of the subsoils were taken with 1% inch and 2 inch I.D. spoon samplers. The samplers were driven into the subsoils at various depths with blows from a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches. This test is similar to the standard penetration test described by ASTM Method D-1586. The penetration resistance values are an indication of the relative density or consistency of the subsoils. Depths at which the samples were taken and the penetration resistance values are shown on the Logs of Exploratory Borings, Figs. 2 and 3. The samples were returned to our laboratory for review by the project engineer and testing. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Graphic logs of the subsurface conditions encountered at the site are shown on Figs. 2 and 3. The subsoils, below about 1/2 foot of topsoil, consist of nil to 171/2 feet H -P GE0TEC1-1 -4 - of very stiff, silty sandy clay overlying relatively dense basalt fragments up to boulder size in a sandy clay matrix. Drilling in the dense basalt with auger equipment was difficult due to the cobbles and boulders and drilling refusal was encountered in the deposit at Borings 1, 4 and 8. Laboratory testing performed on samples obtained from the borings included natural moisture content and density, gradation analyses and Atterberg limits. Results of swell -consolidation testing performed on relatively undisturbed drive samples, presented on Figs. 5 to 7, generally indicate low to moderate compressibility under existing moisture conditions and light loading. Samples tested from the northern portion of the site showed a minor collapse potential (settlement under a constant load) when wetted and moderate compressibility with increased loading after wetting . Samples tested from the southern portion of the site typically showed a minor to low expansion potential after wetting. The clay matrix sample from Boring 7 at 10 feet depth showed a high expansion potential when wetted. Results of a gradation analysis performed on a small diameter drive sample (minus 1' inch fraction) of the more granular soil matrix are shown on Fig. 8. Atterberg limits testing on the upper fine grained soils and clay matrix soils indicate plasticity ranging from low to high. The laboratory testing is summarized in Table I. No free water was encountered in the borings and the subsoils were slightly moist to moist. PRELIMINARY DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS The conclusions and recommendations presented below are based on the proposed development, subsurface conditions encountered in the exploratory borings, and our experience in the area. The recommendations are suitable for planning and preliminary design, but site specific studies should be conducted for individual lot development. H -P GEOTECH -5- ' FOUNDATIONS Bearing conditions will vary depending on the specific building locations and bearing depths. Based on the nature of the proposed construction, spread footings bearing on the natural subsoils should be suitable for building support. We expect the footings can be sized for an allowable bearing pressure in the range of 1,500 psf to 3,000 psf. Expansive clays encountered in building areas may need to be removed or the footings designed to impose a minimum dead load pressure to limit potential heave. Nested boulders could be difficult to excavate and result in irregular bearing conditions. Voids created by boulder removal should be backfilled with compacted road base or concrete. Foundation walls should be designed to span local anomalies and to resist lateral earth loadings when acting as retaining structures. Below grade areas and retaining walls should be protected from wetting and hydrostatic loading by use of an underdrain system. The footings should have a minimum depth of 36 inches for frost protection. FLOOR SLABS Slab -on -grade construction should be feasible for bearing on the natural soils with some risk of post -construction slab movement at sites with expansive clays. The clays could be subexcavated to reduce the potential for slab heave. To reduce the effects of some differential movement, floor slabs should be separated from all bearing walls and columns with expansion joints. Floor slab control joints should be used to reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking A minimum flinch thick layer of free - draining gravel should underlie basement level slabs to facilitate drainage. UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM Although free water was not encountered during our exploration, it has been our experience that local perched groundwater may develop during times of heavy precipitation or seasonal runoff. Frozen ground during spring runoff can create a perched condition. A perimeter underdrain system for shallow crawlspaces should not be required provided that proper drainage is maintained around the buildings. Any H -P GEOTECH -6 - building sites with basement levels or retaining walls should be protected from wetting and hydrostatic pressure buildup by an underdrain system. The drains should consist of drainpipe placed in the bottom of the wall backfill surrounded above the invert level with free -draining granular material. The drain should be placed at each level of excavation and at least 1 foot below lowest adjacent finish grade and sloped at a minimum 1% to a suitable gravity outlet. SURFACE DRAINAGE The grading plan for the subdivision should consider runoff from uphill slopes through the project and at individual sites. Flows should be expected in the gully during intense thunderstorms and unusually heavy snow pack melt. Water should not be allowed to pond which could impact foundations or pavements. To limit infiltration into the bearing soils next to buildings, exterior backfill should be well compacted and have a positive slope away from the building for a distance of at least 10 feet. Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill and landscape irrigation should be restricted in areas with moisture sensitive bearing soils. PAVEMENT SECTION THICKNESS We understand the interior roads and parking areas will be asphalt paved. Design traffic loadings were not available for our analysis. We assume an 18 kip equivalent daily load application (EDLA) of about 10 to 20 for the interior roads with occasional truck traffic, and 5 for automobile parking areas. The subgrade soils encountered at the site are typically low to medium plasticity sandy silty clays which are considered a relatively poor support for pavement materials. Some areas in the northeast commercial area may encounter dense basalt fragments at design subgrade elevations. Based on the soil conditions encountered in the exploratory borings, the laboratory test results and the assumed traffic loadings, the pavement section should consist of 4 inches of asphalt pavement over 8 inches of base course for the interior through streets in the residential and commercial areas and 3 inches of asphalt pavement on 9 inches of base course for the remaining local streets and commercial lot driveways. H -P GEOTECH -7 - Three inches of asphalt pavement over 6 inches of base course should be used for automobile parking areas. The base course should meet CDOT Class 6 specifications and be compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum moisture. Prior to placing the pavement materials, the entire subgrade area should be stripped of any vegetation and topsoil, adjusted to a moisture content near optimum and compacted to at least 95% of standard Proctor density. The pavement subgrade should be proof -rolled with a heavily loaded pneumatic -tired vehicle. Areas which deform excessively should be removed and replaced to achieve a stable subgrade prior to placing pavement materials. Required structural fill below pavement areas should consist of predominantly granular soils, compacted to at Least 95% of standard Proctor density at near optimum moisture content. The subgrade improvements and placement and compaction of base and asphalt materials should be monitored on a regular basis by a representative of the geotechnical engineer. LIMITATIONS This study has been conducted according to generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no warranty either expressed or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from review of previous geologic reports, the exploratory borings located as shown on Fig. 1, the proposed type of construction and our experience in the area. Our fmdings include interpolation and extrapolation of the subsurface conditions identified at the exploratory borings and variations in the subsurface conditions may not become evident until excavation is performed.If conditions encountered during construction appear different from those described in this report, we should be notified so that re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for planning and preliminary design purposes. We are not responsible for technical interpretations H -P GEOTECH - g - , by others of our information. As the project evolves, we should provide continued consultation, conduct additional evaluations and review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations. Significant design changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommendations presented herein. We recommend on-site observation of excavations and foundation bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a representative of the geotechnical engineer. Respectfully Submitted, HEPW ORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. Trevor L. Knell Reviewed by: Steven L. Pawlak, P. TLK/djb cc: High Country Engine u. : ttn: Deric Walter H -P GEOTECH 53.0 5370 5380 5390 5400 5410 7 WEST BATTLEMENT PARKWA r hf Sir/ tx474 - 5350 5360 '^ 5370 5380 5390 1279. 5400 5410 5380 APPROXIMATE SCALE 1" = 200' 5420 5430 5440 5450 102 526 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS Fig. 1 0 ID 0 c 0 5 10 15 20 BORING 1 ELEV.= 5372' 29/12 110-5.4 00-106 26/9,10/0 BORING 2 ELEV.- 5391' 26/12 W0-4.4 00104 20083 LL -46 P1-25 19/8.10/0 6/2,10/0 14/12 BORING 3 ELEV.= 5409' 20/12 10-6.4 ✓ ✓ D200-94 , ; LL -28 i j P1.•10 ✓ ✓ i , ''7' 16/12 ✓ ✓ w0•86 00113 ✓ 1 J11/12 10/0 Note: Explanation of symbols Is shown on Fig. 4. BORING 4 ELEV.= 5417' 16/12 10-15.7 -20073 LL -49 P1-20 0 5 10 — 15 20 Depth — Feet 102 526 HEPWORTH—PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL. INC. LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS Fig. 2 0 y 0 0 O 5 10 15 BORING 5 ELEV.= 5416' 24/12 wt -a6 w-111 -200-91 11-27 w -e 4/8,30/6 c-6.7 -20059 LL+37 P1-19 8/2.10/0 13/4,10/0 BORING 6 ELEV.= 5392' 25/12 litiMG5.7 00-108 '. 41/12 ;4G pci fpr 35/12 a ■ —13 200558 LL -60 P$-34 Xf� i* t 30/12 BORING 7 ELEV.= 5408' 30/12 VIC=B5.5 00-111 20/12 W1=7.1 00-109 -200-88 L1=27 P,-7 37/12 W -13.6 00-115 66/12 BORING 8 ELEV.= 5438' 18/12 WC -6.4 00-106 19/12 w0 -1a1 - 20059 LL -63 PI -40 37x2 WG -122 +4-32 - 20048 0 5 10 15 20 20 Note: Explanation of symbols Is shown, on Fig. 4. Depth — Feet 102 526 HEPWORTH—PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS Fig. 3 LEGEND: 0 TOPSOIL; silty sandy clay, organic, firm, slightly moist, brown. -7 e 29/12 t-1 1 NOTES: CLAY (CL); silty, slightly sandy to very sandy, occasional gravels, stiff to very stiff, slightly moist to moist with depth, Tight brown to brown, slightly calcareous, low to medium plasticity. CLAY AND GRAVEL (CL—GC); sandy, occasional cobbles, very stiff/medium dense, moist brown, shale and basalt fragments. Medium to high plasticity fines. BASALT FRAGMENTS UP TO BOULDER SIZE (GC); in a sandy clay matrix, medium dense to dense, moist, brown. Medium to high plasticity fines. Relatively undisturbed drive sample; 2—inch I.D. Colifomia liner sample. Drive sample; standard penetration test (SPT), 1 3/8 Inch I.D. split spoon sample, ASTM D-1586. Drive sample blow count indicates that 29 blows of a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches were required to drive the California or SPT_sampler 12 inches. Disturbed bulk sample. Practical rig refusal. Where shown above bottom of log, indicates multiple attempts were made to advance the boring. 1. Exploratory borings were drilled on August 20 and 21, 2002 with a 4—inch diameter continuous flight power auger. 2. Locations of exploratory borings were measured approximately by pacing from features shown on the site pion provided. 3. Elevations of exploratory borings were obtained by interpolation between contours on the site plan provided. 4. The exploratory boring locations and elevations should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. 5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory boring logs represent the approximate boundaries between material types and transitions may be gradual. 6. No free water was encountered in the borings at the time of dulling or 2002. Fluctuation in water level may occur with time. 7. Laboratory Testing Results: WC = Water Content ( % ) DD = Dry Density ( pcf ) +4 = Percent retained on No. 4 sieve. —200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve. LL = Liquid Limit ( % ) PI = Plasticity Index ( % ) when checked on September 5, 102 526 HEPWORTH—PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. LEGEND AND NOTES Fig. 4 Compression % Compression % 0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4 • 0.1 1.0 0 APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf 100 Moisture Content = 8.6 percent Dry Density = 113 pcf Sample of: Sandy Clay From: Boring 3 at 4 Feet Compression upon wetting 0.1 1.0 0 APPUED PRESSURE — ksf 100 102 526 HEPWORTH—PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Fig. 5 Moisture Content = 5.4 percent Dry Density = 106 pcf Sample of: Sandy Clay with Gravel From: Boring 1 at 2 Feet • ra...............NNT:\ -\ Compression upon wetting 0.1 1.0 0 APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf 100 Moisture Content = 8.6 percent Dry Density = 113 pcf Sample of: Sandy Clay From: Boring 3 at 4 Feet Compression upon wetting 0.1 1.0 0 APPUED PRESSURE — ksf 100 102 526 HEPWORTH—PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Fig. 5 Compression — Expansion % 2 1 0 1 2 2 2 • 0.1 .0 0 APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf 100 Moisture Content = 5.5 percent Dry Density = 111 pcf Sample of: Sandy Clay From: Boring 7 at 1 Foot ZExpansicn upon watt ng 0.1 .0 0 APPUED PRESSURE — ksf 100 102 526 HEPWORTH—PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Fig. 6 Moisture Content = 5.7 percent Dry Density = 108 pcf Sample of: Sandy Clay FrorraBorIng 6 at 2 Feet Expansion upon watt ng 0.1 .0 0 APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf 100 Moisture Content = 5.5 percent Dry Density = 111 pcf Sample of: Sandy Clay From: Boring 7 at 1 Foot ZExpansicn upon watt ng 0.1 .0 0 APPUED PRESSURE — ksf 100 102 526 HEPWORTH—PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Fig. 6 Compression — Expansion 9. Compression — Expansion % 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 0.1 Moisture Content = 13.8 percent Dry Density = 115 pcf Sample of: Sandy Clay Matrix From: Boring 7 at 10 Feet Expansion upon wetting 2 1 0 1 2 3 .0 0 APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf 100 Moisture Content = 6.4 percent Dry Density = 106 pcf Sample of: Very Sandy Clay From: Boring 8 at 2 Feet Expansion —upon wetting 0.1 .0 10 APPLIED PRFS JRE — ksf 100 102 526 HEPWORTH—PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Fig. 7 • 44INAkkatigit112131€ 241K 71N 041 Ha 15101. 10 20 X) 40 00 O0 70 SO 00 100 IffERONEMER NUL1510 ,YE FANGS 5011 01. 1000M. • 5101. 1 ION POO 003 SEW NIALY515 ILLS STNSN0 50E5 PO 900 AO P N 3A' Awl SQUARE Oroacs 3/4• 11/2' Y rr ___I� ---- —a NM WS. IMINIMr All �EMI - -..110_— :S-- Cara EMI — e- • --- All III•1• N- -- MEIN SIM NEE EMI Min ION -11 ONE .001 :002 .0011 3a .011 .037 .074 .150 102 526 .300 .000 1.11 231 DIAMETER OF PARTICLES IN MIWMETERS 470 031.E 10.0 373 70.2 lop 102 903 127 CLAY TO aT W1[ 1 Y MOMS( l rot IMPEL OPUS GRAVEL 32 R LIQUID LIMIT 9: SAND 22 R SILT AND CLAY 46 % PLASTICITY INDEX X SAMPLE OF: Gravelly Sand and Clay Matrix FROM: Boring 8 at 10 Feet HEPWORTH—PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. 00 O0 70 OD 50 40 30 20 10 0 GRADATION TEST RESULTS Fig. 8 U Z N J 1 a U w Z i r U w WoF- H } W o CD Lu 2 co < Q O J l m 5 a L` o H cc c O 2 2 a toto 2 SOIL OR BEDROCK TYPE sandy clay with gravel co v a c Lo N co V T coco T r co - N slightly sandy clay II sandy clay with gravel (matrix) II Lslightly sandy clay 1 sandy clay with gravel (matrix) I very sandy clay II sandy clay with gravel (matrix) 11 m v v c m W sandy clay and silt I sandy clay (matrix) I, Ivery sandy clay sandy clay with gravel (matrix) I gravelly sand and clay (matrix) i 0 F °m g o r N m Q 0D IT Q LO < (o tF Q Q) t0 Q CO < L!) "t Q r- N co n Q ATTERSERO LIMITS g a r 25 _I 10 20 m 0)Tr o = i 46 coN N 49 N N m 0 (0 N N CO CO ill E,' ' c m E 83 crr W 73 co Ci 10 CO LO CO c0 a) Lo 46 0 F 0 oak = N N I- 32 NATURAL ORY DENSITY IPeO 0 0 r o 0 r 108 CO r• r e r• r co 0 r r .- r co o r LC r '- CO o r NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT I%) e} 8.6 Tt 4 co w co r. ui 5.8 8.7 r-- LO 14.8 LC) LD r N W mID r I 6.4 r r N N r SAMPLE LOCATION x W L o N N r Tr © l • e LO • N In Ol I 0 I g, r N CO It 0 CO 7 CO Project Number: Project Name:6-plex Address: Occupancy: R1, U1 Construction: V -N Gafield County Building and Planning 108 8th Street Ste 201 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 970-945-8212 Plan analysis based on the 1997 Uniform Building Code Date: April 22, 2004 Contractor:Grace homes Architect: Engineer: Report By: A. Schwaller NOTE: The code items listed in this report are not intended to be a complete listing of all possible code requirements in the 1997 UBC. It is a guide to selected sections of the code. tt-I-4 0-b3 _3\nt Gey Page # 2 Code review for: Project Id.: Address: The maximum allowed R1 area on the 2nd floor is 3000 sq.ft. unless the building is of 1 hour fire -resistance construction. -- Sec. 310.2.2 PENETRATIONS OF FIRERESISTIVE ASSEMBLIES WALLS ASSEMBLIES -- Sec. 709.6 Through penetrations: 1) Penetrations shall be installed as tested in the rated assembly. -- Sec. 709.6.2 2) Penetrations shall be protected by an approved penetration firestop system and shall have an F rating of not less than the required rating of the wall penetrated. -- Sec. 709.6.3 Exception: When penetrating items are steel, ferrous or copper pipes or steel conduits and the wall is concrete or masonry, the annular space shall be permitted to be grout or mortar. The minimum thickness is the thickness required to maintain the fire rating. The maximum size of the penetrating items is equivalent to a 6 -inch diameter and the opening is a maximum of Sec. 709.6.1 144 square inches. -- Membrane penetrations: The requirements are the same as -- Sec. 709.7 Exceptions: 1. Steel electrical outlet boxes inches provided that the area 100 square inches for any 100 for through penetrations. that do not exceed 16 square of such openings does not exceed square feet of wall area. Boxes on opposite sides of the assembly shall be separated by a horizontal distance of not less than 24 inches. 2. Sprinklers with metal escutcheon plates. Noncombustible penetrating items shall not be connected to combustible materials on both sides of the membrane unless it can be confirmed that the fire -resistive integrity of wall is maintained. -- Sec. 709.7 Page # 3 Code review for: Project Id.: Address: FLOOR/CEILING AND ROOF/CEILING ASSEMBLIES -- Sec. 710.2 Through pentrations: Through penetrations of fire -resistive horizontal assemblies shall be enclosed in fire -resistive shaft enclosures. -- Sec. 710.2.1 Exceptions: 1. When penetrating items are steel, ferrous or copper conduits, pipes, tubes and vents through a single concrete floor, the annular space shall be permitted to be grout or mortar. The minimum thickness is the thickness required to maintain the fire rating. The maximum size of the penetrating items is equivalent to a 6 -inch diameter and the opening is a maximum of 144 square inches. 2. Electrical outlet boxes that have been tested for use in fire -assemblies. The system shall have an F rating and a T rating of not less than one hour but not less than the required rating of the floor system. -- Sec. 710.2.3 Exception: Floor penetrations contained and located within the cavity of a wall do not require a T rating. Membrane penetrations: The requirements are the same as for through penetrations. -- Sec. 710.3 Exceptions: 1. When penetrating items are steel, ferrous or copper conduits, electrical outlet boxes, pipes, tubes and vents through concrete or masonry and the annular space is protected by an approved penetration firestop assembly or protected to prevent the free passage of flame and products of combustion. Such penetrations shall not exceed an aggregate area of 100 square inches in any 100 square feet of ceiling area in assemblies without penetrations. 2. Electrical outlet boxes that have been tested for use in fire -assemblies. 3. Sprinklers with metal escutcheon plates. Fire -resistive roofs may have unprotected openings. -- Sec. 710.4 Page # 4 Code review for: Project Id.: Address: SMOKE and FIRE DAMPERS -- Sec. 713.10 and 713.11 Dampers shall be accessible for inspection and servicing: 1. Penetrations through area separation walls. Penetrations through occupancy separations. 2. Penetrations of the fire -resistive construction of horizontal exit walls or corridors serving as a means of egress. Exception: Openings for steel ducts penetrating the required fire -resistive construction of corridors are not required to have smoke dampers when such ducts are of not less than 0.019 -inch thickness (26 gage) and have no openings serving the corridor. 3. Penetrations of shaft enclosures. Exceptions: 1. Duct penetrations by steel exhaust air subducts extending vertically upward at least 22 inches above the top of the opening in a vented shaft where the airflow is upward. 2. Penetrations of a fire -resistive floor forming the base of a shaft enclosure may be protected by fire dampers listed for installation in the horizontal position. 3. Smoke dampers are not required when shaft is exhaust only, and is used for continuously operating fans. 4. Penetrations of the ceiling of fire -resistive floor -ceiling or roof -ceiling assemblies. Exception: Smoke dampers are not required. 5. Penetrations of an atrium enclosure element. Exception: Smoke dampers are not required. 6. Penetrations of exterior walls where protection of openings is required. Exception: Smoke dampers are not required. 7. Penetrations of areas of refuge. Exception: Ventilation system designed to supply outside air during an emergency. 8. Smoke dampers are required in smoke barriers and elevator lobbies. Page # 5 Code review for: Project Id.: Address: DRAFT STOPS: If there is combustible construction in the floor/ceiling assembly, draft stops shall be installed in line with walls separating individual dwelling units and guest rooms from each other and from other areas. - - Sec. 708.3.1.1.2 If there is combustible construction in the roof/ceiling assembly, draft stops shall be installed in line with walls separating individual dwelling units and guest rooms from each other and from other areas. - - Sec. 708.3.1.2.1 FOR R1 OCCUPANCY: A 1 hr. occupancy separation is required around common storage and laundry rooms. -- Sec. 310.2.2 A 1 hr. fire separation is required between dwelling units. -- Sec. 310.2.2 For the minimum width of doors, see Sec. 1003.3.1.3 For the minimum width of hallways, see Sec. 1004.3.3.2 For the minimum width of corridors, see Sec. 1004.3.4.2 For the minimum width of stairways, see Sec. 1003.3.3.2 FOOTNOTES: FLUSH AND SURFACE BOLTS: Manually operated edge- or surface -mounted flush bolts and surface bolts or any other type of device that may be used to close or restrain the the door other than by operation of the locking device shall not be used. When automatic flush bolts are used, the door leaf having the automatic flush bolt shall not have a door knob or surface -mounted hardware. The unlatching of any leaf shall not require more than one operation. -- Sec. 1003.3.1.8 LOCKS AND LATCHES: Regardless of the occupant load served, exit doors shall be openable from the inside without the use of a key or any special knowledge or effort. -- Sec. 1003.3.1.8 Page # 6 Code review for: Project Id.: Address: STAIR NOTES: Private stairs: Private stairways and stairs serving an occupant load less than 10: 1) A private stairway must be at least 36 inches wide. -- Sec. 1003.3.3.2 2) The maximum rise of a step is 8 inches and the minimum run is 9 inches. -- Sec. 1003.3.3.3, Exception 1 3) Provide a handrail on one side of stairway 34 to 38 inches above the nosing if there is more than 3 risers. -- Sec. 1003.3.3.6, Exceptions 4) Provide a guard rail where drop off is greater than 30 inches. - - Sec. 509.1 5) The minimum height is 42 inches. -- Sec. 509.2 6) Open guardrails shall have intermediate rails or ornamental pattern such that a sphere 4 inches in diameter cannot pass through. - - Sec. 509.3 The triangular opening formed at the riser, tread and guardrail may be 6 inches. -- 509.3, Exception 2 7) The minimum headroom is 6 ft.- 8 inches. Such clearance shall be measured vertically from a plane parallel and tangent to the stairway tread nosing to the soffit above at all points. -- Sec. 1003.3.3.4 8) Enclosed usable space under the stairs is required to be protected as required for 1 hr. fire -resistive construction. -- Sec. 1003.3.3.9 LANDINGS AT DOORS: 1) A floor or landing shall be provided on each side of doors. When access for persons with disabilities is required. the floor or landing shall not be more than 1/2 inch lower than the threshold. When access is not required, the maximum is 1 inch. -- Sec. 1003.3.1.6 2) Landings shall have a width not less than the width of the stairway or width of the doorway, whichever is the greater. Where a landing serves an occupant load of 50 or more, doors in any position shall not reduce the landing dimension to less than one half it required width. The minimum length in the direction of exit travel is 44 inches. - - Sec. 1003.3.1.7 TRAVEL DISTANCE: (distance to an exit) The maximum travel distance in this building is 200 feet. -- Sec. 1004.2.5. Travel distance shall not be limited within an exit enclosure or exit passageway. -- Sec. 1005.2.2 BUILDING ACCESSIBILITY: 1) This building including each tenant shall be provided with at least one entrance which complies with the accessible route provisions of CABO/ANSI A117.1. At least 50 percent of all entrances shall be accessible. -- Sec. 1103.2.3 Page # 7 Code review for: Project Id.: Address: ROOFING REQUIREMENTS: 1) The roofing on this building is required to be Class C. -- Table 15-A 2) See section 1504 and ICBG research reports for requirements. FIRE ALARM SYSTEM: A manual fire alarm system need not be provided when all units and contiguous attic and crawl spaces are separated from each other and public or common areas by at least one-hour fire -resistive occupancy separations and each unit has an exit directly to the exterior. -- Sec. 310.10 exc. 1 The alarm system is to be as set forth in the Fire Code. LIGHT AND VENTILATION 1) All habitable rooms require exterior glazed openings equal to 1/10 or more of the floor area. (min 10 sq.ft.) -- Sec. 1203.2 Exception: Kitchens may be provided with artificial light. 2) All habitable rooms require an operable exterior openings equal to 1/20 or more of the floor area. (min 5 sq.ft.) -- Sec. 1203.3 The minimum area in bath rooms is 1 1/2 sq.ft. Exc: Laundry Rooms In lieu of required exterior openings for ventilation, a mechanical ventilation system may be provided. Such system shall be capable of providing two air changes per hour. 3) In bathrooms containing a bathtub or shower and laundry rooms, the ventilation system shall be connected directly to the outside and be capable of providing five air changes per hour. The point of discharge shall be at least 3 feet from any openings which allows air entry into the building. Rooms which only contain a water closet and/or lavatory may be vented using a mechanical recirculating fan designed to remove odors from the air. -- Sec. 1203.3 Page # 8 Code review for: Project Id.: Address: WALL AND CEILING FINISH: 1) Wall and ceiling finish materials are required to comply with Sec. 804.1 and Table 8-B. 2) Carpeting on the ceiling is required to have a Class I flame spread rating. -- Sec. 804.2 3) Textile wall coverings shall have Class I flame spread rating. and shall be protected by automatic sprinklers or meet the acceptance criteria of U.B.C. Standard No. 8-2 -- Sec. 805 4) Toilet room floors shall have a smooth, hard nonabsorbent surface that extends upward onto the walls at least 5 inches. - - Sec. 807.1.1 5) Walls within 2 feet of the front and sides of urinals and water closets shall have a smooth, hard nonabsorbent surface. - - Sec. 807.1.2 INSULATION NOTES: 1) All insulation material including facings are required to have a flame -spread rating of 25 or less and a maximum smoke density of 450 unless it is in a concealed space and the facing is in contact with a wall or ceiling. -- Sec. 707.3 exc.2 2) Foam plastic insulations are required to be protected. Sec. 2602 ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS: For R1 occupancy 1) Provide a window or door to the exterior from every room used for sleeping. -- Sec. 310.4. The window must provide a clear open area of 5.7 sq.ft., a clear height of 24 inches(minimum), and a clear width of 20 inches(minimum). -- Sec. 310.4 2) All habitable rooms require exterior glazed openings equal to 1/10 or more of the floor area. (min 10 sq.ft.) -- Sec. 1203.2 3) All habitable rooms require an operable exterior openings equal to 1/20 or more of the floor area. (min 5 sq.ft.) -- Sec. 1203.3 4) Apartments - Provide a smoke detector in all sleeping rooms and areas having access to sleeping rooms. -- Sec. 310.9.1.4 5) Hotel/Motel - Provide a smoke detector in the main room or each sleeping room. -- Sec. 310.9.1.5 6) The minimum ceiling in a habitable space is 7 feet 6 inches except kitchens, halls, and baths may have a ceiling height of 7 feet. - - Sec. 310.6.1 Page # 9 Code review for: Project Id.: Address: GLAZING REQUIREMENTS All glazing in hazardous locations is required to be of safety glazing material. -- Sec. 2406.3 & 2406.4 Locations: 1) Glazing in ingress and egress doors except jalousies. 2) Glazing in fixed and sliding panels of sliding door assemblies and panels in swinging doors other than wardrobe doors. 3) Glazing in storm doors. 4) Glazing in all unframed swinging doors. 5) Glazing in doors and enclosures for hot tubs, whirlpools, saunas, steam rooms, bathtubs and showers. Glazing in any portion of a building wall enclosing these compartments where the bottom exposed edge of the glazing is less than 60 inches above a standing surface and drain inlet. 6) Glazing in fixed or operable panels adjacent to a door where the nearest exposed edge of the glazing is within a 24 -inch arc of either vertical edge of the door in a closed position and where the bottom exposed edge of the glazing is less than 60 inches above the walking surface. 7) Glazing in an individual fixed or operable panel, other than those locations described in items 5 and 6 above, than meets all of the following conditions: A. Exposed area of an individual pane greater than 9 square feet. B. Exposed bottom edge less than 18 inches above the floor. C. Exposed top edge greater than 36 inches above the floor. D. One or more walking surfaces within 36 inches horizontally of the plane of the glazing. 8) Glazing in railings regardless of height above a walking surface. Included are structural baluster panels and nonstructural in -fill panels. 9) Glazing in walls and fences used as the barrier for indoor and outdoor swimming pools and spas when the bottom edges is less than 60 inches above the pool side and the glazing is within 5 feet of the pool or spa water's edge. 10) Glazing in walls enclosing stairway landings or within 5 feet of then bottom and top of stairways where the bottom edge is less than 60 inches above the walking surface. Page # 10 Code review for: Project Id.: Address: ATTIC REQUIREMENTS: 1) Provide an access to all attic areas with a clear height of 30 inches or more. The minimum size is 22 inches by 30 inches. There must be 30 inches or more clear height above the access. -- Sec. 1505.1 2) Provide ventilation in all attic areas. The net free vent area is to be not less than 1 square foot for each 150 square feet of attic area. The vent area may be 1/300 if at least 50% of the required ventilating area is provided by ventilators located in the upper portion of the attic. The upper ventilators must be at least 3 feet above the eave or cornice vents. -- Sec. 1505.3, Exception 1 The vent area may be 1/300 provided a vapor retarder having a transmission rate not exceeding 1 perm is installed on the warm side of the attic insulation. -- Sec. 1505.3, Exception 2 3) Where eave or cornice vents are installed, insulation shall not block the fee flow of air. A minimum of 1 inch of air space shall be provided between the insulation and roof sheathing. -- Sec. 1505.3 INSPECTION WILL NOT BE MADE UNLESS THIS CARD IS POSTED ON THE JOB 24 HOURS NOTICE REQUIRED FOR INSPECTIONS BUILDING PERMIT GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO Date Issued&la1A .....Zoned Area Permit No cvax4 AGREEMENT In consideration of the issuance of this permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with all laws and regulations related to the zoning, location; construction and erection of the proposed structure for which this permit is granted, and further agrees that if the above said regulations are not fully complied with in the zoning, location, erection and construction of the above described structure, the permit may then be revoked by notice from the County Building Inspector end IMMEDIATELY BECOME NULL AND ND VOID. Ue 1Na a Address or Legal Description GettS, LA/ LL OwnerGYOhCL `u`a Contractor 0 La Setbacks Front Side Side Rear This Card Must Be Posted So It is Plainly Visible From The Street Until Final Inspection. INSPECTION RECORD Footing fj,lT,, A.�_, "c` c,a Foundation Underground Plumbing 8.3-01/40n4 Insulation /- a 7-0 £ 49-KA— Rough Plumbing /-/ Drywall g_/_os ,gm_ Chimney & Vent I- as..-iC - Electric Final (by State lnspector13as.uc°' Gas Piping /._.go—O,h i4 --. Final 9%9-05' ,9 v\ �s Electric Rough (By State Inspector/ :;.,),(1 X, Septic Final P Framing (-a'5`oS�m (To include Roof in place and Windows and Doors installed). �(� Notes:- 11-2S-olMat ALL LISTED ITEMS MUST BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE COVERING - WHETHER INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR, UNDERGROUND OR ABOVE GROUND. THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE Phone 3845003 109 8th Street County Courthouse Glenwood Springs, Colorado. AP OVEDDO NOT DESTROY THIS CARD E Date ist)otriBytosarsim IF PLACED OUTSIDE - COVER WITH CLEAR PLASTIC