The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutApplication-PermitI Garfield County Building & Planning Department 108 8th Street, Suite #401 Glenwood Springs, Co. 81601 Office:970·945·8212 Fax: 970·384-3470 Inspection Line: 970·384-5003 Building Permit No. _/0'8'19 Parcel No: 2395-1 02-00-141 -·"~--··~----------> -~·-·-----------~ Locality: Job Address: TBD cr 125, GWS <ll'q/1}~-~ di\ltU·~ ovt . Use of Building: _ s/felovelling en eFawl spaee w/eov deek & att Q<lfagB. G<}(_ fl\IL."'--"'--1.1- Owner: -------- Contractor: Crabb Fees: Plan Check: 991.74 Septic: 73.00 Bldg Permit: __ $ ____ 1,5_2575 Other Fees: -·-----" Total Fees: $ 2,590.49 + ;qo.5Y--- Clerk: Date: I 2 3 4 5 6 7 Class of Work: Garage: 12 GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION 108 8" Street, Suite 401, Glenwood Springs, Co 81601 Phone: 970-945-82!2/ Fax: 970-384-3470 I Inspection Line: 970-384-5003 www.garfield.-countv.corn Alt Ph: No, of Floors: 2 • Authority. This application for a Building Pennit must be signed by the Owner of the property, described above, or an authorized agent. If the signature below is not that of the Owner, a separate letter of authority, signed by the Owner, must be provided with this APPlication. Legal Access. A Building Permit cannot be issued without proof of legal and adequate access to the property for purposes of inspections by the Building Department Other Permits. Multiple separate pennits may be required: (l) State Electrical Permit, (2) County ISDS Permit, (3) another permit required for use on the property identified above, e.g. State or County Highway/ Road Access or a State Wastewater Discharge Permit. Void' Permit. A Building Permit becomes null and void if the work authorized is riot commenced within 180 days of the date of issuance and if work is suspended or abandoned for a period of 180 days after commencement. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that I have read this Application and that the information contained above is true and correct. I understand that the Building Department accepts the Application, along with the plans and specifications and other data submitted by me or on my behalf (submittals), based upon my certification as to accuracy. Assuming completeness of the submittals and approval of this Application, a Building Permit will be issued granting pennission to me, as Owner, to construct the structure(s) and facilities detailed on the submittals reviewed by the Building Department. In consideration of the issuance of the Building Pennit, I agree that I and my agents will comply with provisions of any federal, state or local law regulating the work and the Garfield County Building Code, ISDS regulations and applicable land use regulations (County Regulation(s)). I acknowledge that the Bullding Pennit may be suspended or revoked, upon notice from the County, if the location, construction or use of the structure(s) and facility(ies), described above, are not in compliance with County Regulation(s) or any other applicable law. I hereby grant permission to the Building Department to enter the property, described above, to inspect the work. I further acknowledge that the issuance of the Building Permit does not prevent the Building Official from: (1) requiring the corr,ection of errors in the submittals, if any, discovered after issuance; or (2) stopping construction or use of the structure(s) or facility(ies) if such is in violatio of County Regulation(s) or any other applicable law. Review of this Application, including submittals, and i pections of the work by the Building Department do not constitute an acceptance of responsibility or liability by the County of errors, omissio or discrepancies. As the Owner, I acknowledge that onsi 'ty for compliance with federal, state and local laws and County Regulations rest with me and my authorized agents, including without limitation my architect designer, en · dl bui I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDG RE UNDERSTAND THE NOTICE & CE TIFICATION ABOVE: OWNERSSI Conditions: ~~j;£ t.Arid£ w~'()f <a~ Plan Check~ DA STAFF USE ONLY Permi~ Manu home Fee: 400°0 C7 Mise Fees: ISDSFee, /3 60 Fees Paid: Balance Due: ~ & Issue Date: ISDS No & Issued Date: Setbacks: BLDG DEPT: \ DDb '30 OCCGroup: ~-. t. .-olr DATE I $'S:LI l'j ConstType: Zoning: DATE The following items are required by Garfield County for a final Inspection: 1) A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector. 2) Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department and posted at the structure and where readily visible from access road. 3) A finished roof; a lockable building; completed exterior siding; exterior doors and windows installed; a complete kitchen with cabinets, sink with hot & cold running water, non-absorbent kitchen floor covering, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove and refrigerator; all necessary plumbing. 4) All bathrooms must be complete, with washbowl, tub or shower, toilet, hot and cold running water, non-absorbent floors, walls finished, and privacy door. 5) Steps over three (3) risers, outside or inside must be must have handrails. Balconies and decks over 30" high must be constructed to all me and lRC requirement~ including guardrails. 6) Outside grading completed so that water slopes away from the building; 7) Exceptions to the outside steps, decks, grading may be made upon the demonstration of extenuating circumstances., i.e. weather. Under such circumstances A Certificate of Occupancy may be issued conditionally. 8) A final inspection sign off by the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department for driveway installation, where applicable; as well as any final sign off by the Fire District, and/or State Agencies where applicable. A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (C.O.) WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. A C.O. MAY TAKE UP TO 5 BUSINESS I> A YS TO BE PROCESSED AND ISSUED. OWNER CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A C.O. IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATING PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET. I understand and agree to abide by the above conditions for occupancy, use and the issuance of a C.O. for the building identified in the Building Permit. Bapplicationdecember2007 VALUATION FEE DETERMINATION Applicant Address Date -;:L:.:::is;::te;_..r.:..:Am~e"'nd::.:mi"'e"'n"-t -------Subdivision Dry Park Road Lot/Block -::8":.4'-:.0!::8==::::..--------Contractor Finished (Livable Area): Main Upper Lower Other Total Basement: Unfinished Square Feet Valuation Conversion of Unfinished to Finished Total Garage: Carport: Total Crawl Space Total Decks/ Patios Total Valuation Square Feet Valuation Valuation Covered Open Valuation Type of Construction: Occupancy: Valuation Total Valuation sq.ft sq.ft sq.ft sq.ft X $74.68 0 sq.ft 1320 sq.ft X $41.00 sq.ft X $33.68 400 sq.ft X $18.00 sq.ftX $18.00 400 sq.ft sq.ft X $9.00 sq.ft X $24.00 840 sq.ft X $12.00 Commercial sf X sf X sf X sf X sf X sf X 0.00 54,120.00 7,200.00 0.00 10,080.00 0.00 71,400.00 VALUATION FEE DETERMINATION Applicant Address Date ~L:::is:.:t.:;:er,.....,-=:---:-'--'---~--_;_;-Subdivision -"D::,:ry,._· ~P7ar'-':k'-:'R"'o::.:a:::d ______ _;_-'--Lot/Block ..:3"-'12::,:6"-'/2::,:0::,:0:::8_.:_ ___ _;_ __ -'--_ _;__ Contractor Finished (Livable Area): Main Upper Lower Other Total Basement: Unfinished Square Feet Valuation Conversion ofUnfinished to Finished Total Valuation Garage: Valuation Crawl Space Valuation Decks/ Patios Valuation Covered Open Type of Construction: Occupancy: Valuation Total Valuation 1368 sf sf 936 sf sf X $74.68 2304 sf sf X $41.00 sf X $33.68 sf X $18.00 432 sf X $9.00 784 sf X $24.00 sf X $12.00 Commercial sf X sf X sf X sf X sf X sf X Farahyll V~(CA.(\~\.1 \\ ··~ 12 Roger Crabb 172;062.72 0.00 0.00 3,888.00 18,816.00 0.00 194,766.72 GARFIELD COUNTYBtJILDTNG'AND PLANNING 970-945-8212 MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS For SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING CONSTRUCTION Including NEW CONSTRUCTION ADDITIONS ALTERATIONS And MOVED BUILDINGS In order to understand the scope of the work intended under a permit application and expedite the issuance of a permit it is· important that complete information be provided. When reviewing a plan and it's discovered that required information has not been provided by the applicant, this will result in the delay of the permit issuance and in proceeding with building construction. The owner or contractor shall be required to provide this information before the plan review can proceed. Other plans that are in line for review may be given attention before the new information may be reviewed after it has been provided to the Building Department. · Please review this document to determine if you have enough information to design your project and provide adequate information to facilitate a plan review. Also, please consider using a design professional for assistance in your design and a construction professional for construction of your project. Any project with more than ten (10) occupants requires the plans to be sealed by a Colorado Registered Design Professional. To provide for a more understandable plan in order to determine compliance with the building, plumbing and mechanical codes, applicants are requested to review the following checklist prior to and during design. Applicants are required to indicate appropriately and to submit the completed checklist at time of application for a permit. Plans to be included for a Building Permit, must be on drafting paper at least 18"x24" and drawn to scale. Plans must include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations all sides with I decks, balcony, steps, handrails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the finish grade line and original grade. A section showing in detail, from the bottom of the footing to the top of the roof, including re-bar, anchor bolts, pressure treated plates, floor joists, wall studs and spacing, insulation, sheeting, house-rap, (which is required), siding or any approved building material. Engineered foundations may be required. A window schedule. A door schedule. A floor framing plan, a roof framing plan, roof must be ·designed to withstand a 40 pound per square foot up to 7,000 feet in elevation, a 90 M.P.H. wind speed, wind exposure B or C, and a 36 inch frost depth. All sheets to be identified by number and indexed. All of the above requirements must be met or your plans will be returned. All plans submitted must be incompliance with the 2003 IRC. 1. Is a site plan included that identifies the location of the proposed structure or addition and distances to the property lines from each corner of the proposed structure(s) prepared by a licensed surveyor and has the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing? Properties with slopes of 30% or greater must be shown on the site plan. (NOTE Section: 106.2) Any site plan for the placement of any portion of a structure within 50 ft. of a property line and not within a previously surveyed building envelope on a subdivision final plat shall be prepared by a licensed surveyor and have the surveyor's signature and professional stamp on the drawing. Any structure to be built within a building envelope of a lot shown on a recorded subdivision plat shall include a copy of the building env~lope as it is shown on the final plat with the proposed structure located withinthy-envelope. Yes__,·;£_"--- 2. Does the site plan also include any other buildings on the property, setback easements and utility easements? Please refer to Section 5.05.03 in the Garfield County Zoning Resolution if the property you are applying for a building permit on is located on a corner lot. Special setbacks d~pply. Yes._--'V,__ __ 3. Does the site plan include when applicable the location of the I.S.D.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System) and the distances to the property lines, wells (on subject property and adjacent P:9Perties), streams or water courses? Yes ~ _ __L_ __ 4. Does the site plan indicate the location and direction of the County or private road accessing the property? 2 Yes ./ ---''---- 5. Are you aware that prior to submittal of a building permit application you are required to show proof of a driveway access permit or obtain a statement from the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department stating one is not necessary? You can contact the Road & Bridge Departmentp~625-8601. Yes. __ ..!:v __ _ 6. Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all reinforcing §lee! in accordance with the IRC or per stamped engineered design? Yes __ _:/ __ _ 7. Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl spaces and 1:lj.e clearances required between wood and earth? Yes __ _,Vc__ __ _ 8. Do the plans indicate the size and location of ventilation openings for the attic, roof joist spaces and sl)ffits? Yes \/ ' 9. Do the plans include design loads as required by Garfield County for roof snow loads, (a minimum of 40 pounds per square foot up to & including 7,000 feet above sea level), floor loads and WllJ.d loads? Yes __ _,-.£_'----- I 0. Does the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor, and roof construction?/ Yes ·./ II. Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists, wall studs, ceiling joists, roofra~ers or joists or trusses? Yes L ---"'---- 12. Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method of positive connection of all columns aJtf! beams? · Yes ./ 13. Does the elevation plan .indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the undisturbed grade to the midpointbetween the ridge and eave of a gable or shed roof or the top of a fl~t £of? (Building height measurement usually not to exceed 25 feet) Yes __ ...,Vc__ __ 14. Does the plan include any stove or zero Clearance fireplace planned for installation including 3 ~-t-Qoo~~~,.&- make and model and Colorado Phas.~ I certifications or phase II EPA certification? Yes No ____ ~v'--~~~ 15. Does the plan include a masonry fireplace including a fireplace section indicating design to comply with the IRC? / Yes No __ .;__ __ _ 16. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that egress/rescue windows from sleepi!Jfo rooms and/or basements comply with the requirements of the IRC? Yes ../ No ____________ __ 17. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that windows provide natural light and venf ation for all habitable rooms? Yes No ____________ _ 18. Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass doors, glazing immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as a walking surface; sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub enclosures and specifYsjlfety glazing for these areas? Yes .,/_ No ________ _ 19. Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces, boilers and water heaters indicated on j;he plan? Yes . -.,{_ N a ________ _ 20. Do you understand that if you are building on a parcel of land created by the exemption . \~.process or the subdivision process, are building plans in compliance with all plat notes -\\X'and/or covenants? ~ Yes No _______ _ 21. Do you understand that if you belong to a Homeowners Association (HOA), it is your responsibility to obtain written permission from the association, if required by that -~~association, prior to submitting an application for a building permit? The building ~' permit application will be accepted without it, but you run the risk of the HOA bringing action to enforce the covenants, which can result in revocation of permit issued. Additionally, your Plan Review fee is not refundable if the plans have been reviewed by the Building Department prior to any action by the HOA that requires either revocation or substantial modification of the plans. 22. 23. Yes No __________ _ Will this be :r.{e only residential structure on the parcel? Yes V No Ifno-Explain: ____________ _ Have two (~complete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the application? Yes __ V~--- 4 24. Do you understand that the minimum dimension a home can be on a lot is 20ft. wide and 20ft. long? / Yes ~ No ____ _ 25. Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other construction ;tUde requirements? Yes \1 No ____ __ 26. Do your plans comply with all zoning rules and regulations in the County related to your properties zone_liistrict? Yes ·v No ------ 27. Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a final inspection b)Jllie Garfield County Building Department? Yes ~-No ____ __ 28. Do you understand that approval for design and/or construction changes are required prior to the appligttion of these changes? Yes V No _____ _ 29. Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a "Plan Review" fee from you at the time of application submittal and that you will be required to pay the "Permit Fee" as well as any "Road Impact" or "Septic System" fees required, at the time you pick up your building pejil'nit? Yes L No _____ _ 30. Are you aware that you must call in for an inspection by 3:30 the business day before the requested inspection in order to receive it the following business day? Inspections will be made from 7:30a.m. to 3:30p.m. Monday through Friday. Inspections are to be calledii)A:o 384-5003. Yes \.L No _____ ...c_ 31. Are you aware that requesting inspections on work that is not ready or not accessible will result in a $5\)-.00 re-inspection fee? Yes -~ No ____ __ 32. Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the IRC including approval on a final inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy and occupancy ofJihe building? Yes .../ No ______ _ 5 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. Are you aware that the Permit Application must be signed by the Owner or a written authority being given for an Agent and that the party responsible for the project must comply with the IRC? / Yes ,L No ______ _ Do you understand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed Electrician and Plumber to perform installations and hookups, unless you as the homeowner are performing the work? The license number of the person performing the work will be required at time oyapplicable inspection. Yes v No _______ _ Are you aware, that on the front of the Building Permit Application you will need to fill in the Parcel/Schedule Number for the lot you are applying for this permit on prior to submittal of a building p9'fillit application? Your attention in this is appreciated. Yes . \(__ No _______ _ Do you know that the local firLict ma'y re.quire you to submit plans for their review of fire safety issues? Yes No (please check with the building department about this requirement) Do you understand that if you are planning on doing any excavating or grading to the property prior to issuance of a building permit that you will be required to obtain a grading permit? / Yes ·v _ _z_ __ Are you aware that if you will be connecting to a public water and/or sewer system, that the tap fees have to be paid and the connections inspected by the service provider prior to the issuance o~erti.ficate of Occupancy? Yes \ • I have read, understand and answered these questions to the Signatur 03/02 l ?roK . Date I Phone: CJ1o-2?zt-qG1tf-(days); Project Name: Ls\tQ.. f?es, QQCE: 9ffi~ 224--96?tf. (evenings) n ~~ r Project Address: [Q(ZJ?rN'b,JLI .. VAx:l1 , \®!27 \..Jp11.::.J'I I I Notes: If you have answered "No" on any of the questions, you may be required to provide this 6 information at the request of the Building Official prior to beginning the plan review process. Delays in issuing the permit are to be expected. Work may not proceed without the issuance of a permit. If it is determined by the Building Official that additional information is necessary to review the application and plans to determine minimum compliance with the adopted codes, the application may be placed behind more recent applications for building permits in the review process and not reviewed until required information has been provided and the application rotates again to first position for review, delay in issuance ofthe permit or delay in proceeding with construction. Bpminreq November2006 7 GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING REQUIREMENTS Codes: 2003 IRC, lBC, IFGC, IMC, IPC, Setbacks: Check subdivisions and zone district for setback requirements. Snowload (measured at the roof): 40PSF up to 7000ft. elevation. 50PSF 7001 to 8000ft. Seismic design category: B 7 5PSF 8001 to 9000ft. JOOPSF 9001 to lOOOOft. Weathering probability for concrete: Severe Termite infestation probability: None to slight Wind speed: 90mph Decay probability: None to slight Wind Exposure: B or C (see section R301.2.1.4) Frost Depth: 36in. to 8000ft. elevation. 42in. 800 I and above. Winter Design Temperature: Minus 2 to 7000ft.; minus 16 over 7000ft. elevation. Air Freezing Index: 2500deg F-days to 7000ft.; over 7000ft. to be determined by Building Official. Ice shield under-layment required. Mean Annual temp.: Variable Insulation: Maximum glazing U factor: 0.50 Minimum R-Values: • Ceilings/roofs R values are: R-30 stick built structures. R-38 log construction and steel rafter construction. • Walls R values are R-19 wood frame; R-19 cavity R-3 sheathing steel studs. • Floors R-values are R-19. • • • Basement wall R-values are R-10 be!'ow grade, R-19 above grade. Slab perimeter R-value and depth is R- 10/36in. Crawl space wall R-values are R-10 below grade and R -19 above grade If floors over crawl spaces are not insulated, the crawl space walls must be insulated. Basement wall must be insulated to frost depth. Common walls garage to house must have R-19 insulation. Commori ceiling/floor garage to house must have R-19. Take precautions to protect plumbing in these areas. GARFIELD COUNTY .DIUVEWA'¥, PERMIT REQUIREMENTS Information required by Garfield County Road & Bridge for driveway permits or exemption letters: State your request (driveway permit vs. exemption). Legal description; lot & block # preferred, meets & bounds if necessary Plat or sketch, showing driveway location and any easements (must show nearest County road & be legible). · Owner of record (as appears on the tax roll), Owner's mailing address, phone, fax (&cell if applicable). Subcontractor (if applicable) with contact person, address, phone, fax & cell. Be prepared to show your property pins/comers, and meet Road Foreman if necessary. Quick reference guidelines for new or change of use driveways: v" Only one access per parcel (unless demonstrated need) v" 90 degree intersection w/County road for first 30 feet v" 4% maximum grade for first 30 feet v" 3" thick hot asphalt apron if County road .is paved or chipped v" 250 feet visibility in both directions v" Corrugated steel culvert ifa road ditch is crossed (15" min, no plastic or aluminum) v" Driveway runoff must not reach County road! v" Obtain permit before cormnencing work, pay fee & sign, keep on site v" Complete the driveway within 30 days of pulling permit, DO NOT DELAY! Initial Contact: Distlict 1 (from Canyon Creek east to County line): Bobby Branham-945-1223 District 2 (North of 1-70 and west to Cojlllty line): K.raig K\lberry .-625-8601 District 3 (South of 1-70 and west to CoUn.ty line): Jake Jv1a1].,-625-8601]-C...e.. \\ Secondary Contact: to\%-(olt}Lf, Road & Bridge Main Office: 0567 County Road 352, (Airport Road), Rifle; CO 81650-ph 625- 8601. Mike or Wendy can fax you the completed permit or you can stop in and pick it up. You can pay in person or by mail, and you can sign in person or by fax (625-8627). 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. GARFIELD COUNTY DRIVEWAY PERMIT FORM Permit Owner: Address: City (please check the appropriate box) --Carbondale (81623) __ Glenwood Springs (81601) __ New Castle (81647) __ Silt (81652) __ Rifle (81650) __ Parachute (81635) Other: Phone No. Fax No. County Road No. Nearest Intersection or Address: Distance from Intersection or Address: Direction from Intersection or Address: N s Side ofRoad: N s E -- Width of driveway: 30-feet 40 feet Culvert required: Yes No -- Size of culvert required: 12 inch 15 inch -- Other: Length of culvert required: 30 feet 40 feet Asphalt or concrete pad required: Yes Q~ E w w Other: 18 inch Other: No 15. Size of pad: 30-foot wide X 10 foot long X 4-inches thick Yes 40-foot wide X 10 foot long X 4-inches thick Yes Other: 16. Gravel portion required: ___ Yes No 17. Length of gravel portion: 40 foot 50 foot 100 foot 18. Trees, brush and fence removed for visibility: Yes ---No 19. Distance and direction from driveway to be removed: 20. Certified traffic control required: ___ Yes ___ No 21. Work zone signage only required: ___ Yes No --- Please initial the following three items indicating that they have been read and acknowledged: 22. No more than 3% slope away from County Road: (initials) 23. Driveway must be constructed so no drainage accesses County Road from driveway: __ (initials) 24. Inspection of driveway will be required upon completion and must be approved by person issuing permit or representative of person issuing permit: __ (i~ltials). 24. District permit issued in: 1 __ 2 __ 3 25. Person issuing permit: 26 Date: PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST Applicant L , , :2t ecz Date 3 -21.. ~oY /Building ~Engineered Foundation ~Driveway Permit / L/ Surveyed Site Plan ~Septic Permit and Setbacks (./Grade/Topography 30% ~ ~ch Residential Plan Review List -t.L"Minimum Application Questionnaire ~bdivision Plat Notes -*ire Department Review V Valuation Determination/Fees ~ed Line Plans/Stamps/Sticker ~Attach Conditions dApplication Signed L..--'Plan Reviewer To Sign Application VParcel/Schedule No. 4-40# SnowloadLetter-Manf. Hms. _0us Report GENERAL NOTES: Planning/Zoning ---l,LProperty Line Setbacks v30ft Stream Setbacks ~oodPlain ~ilding Height __lLZoning Sign-off _0.oad Impact Fees ....t.L:HOA!DRC Approval ~ade/Topography 40% ~Planning Issues -t,L Subdivision Plat Notes Garfield County Building & Planning Department 108 8th Street Suite40 1 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Re: Building Permit No. 10879 Dear Sir/Madam, 125 County Road 156 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 July 20tl', 2008 970-274-9674 (cell) Please find attached alterations for Permit No. 10879 Further to my recent conversation with Andy Waller I have included; 2 x Site Plan 2 x Foundation Plan 2 x Floor plan Due to the adverse mortgage market we have had to change our building plans. We require our building permit to be amended to incorporate a modular home on a walk out basement. There will be no other changes to the site reflected in the building permit already issued. The only change is the building itself. The walk out basement will include a double garage and 2 bedrooms. We plan on leaving the bedrooms unfinished till a later date. Electrical and plumbing will be roughed in for a later completion date. Per my conversation with Andy, we will proceed with site preparation excavation to the point where the first inspection is required. Please do not hesitate to contact me if additional information is required. Stephen Lister. ld County BUILDING & PLANNING DEPARTMENT T~!E ;3 E. c-1 t.J ~e.; or:-TilE Gu;<leo L:? ;;> I"'"-/\. t 4 ,A T? iJ "--' p II" E5 A~:_.o"" ~ // ~ U€ AJIJ t ~;t;:A -To ') L.;;, v t .t.jJ '77'(-3; ·r .. tv 1 Tl~ /7hrvf(IN 4 /) 11 )l f?,."'VZI<. Rl)/1.0 X J f(~>w '7lrEy fkte:: p, ~<1 ue:.: t..vA y A,vp (e; "'1 ,P(_j !<.( Q,j 1/( c: Mf>vl$. 108 Eighth Street, Suite 401 o Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 (970) 945-8212 o (970) 285-7972 • Fax: (970) 384-3470 Garfield Application for Driveway Permit 51tfi-I&J .. Person Obtaining Permit: ,§'t : e:: Lister Applicqtion Date: 2/19/2008 County Road Number: 125 District: Glenwood Permit Number: GRBOB-D-20 Termination Date: 4/19li008 Inspector: Wyau Keesbery hereby requests permissi~n and authority from th_e B!>atd. of C:ounty Commissioners to construct a driveway approach.( es) on.the right-of-way off of County Road, 125, lOOSftEast of CR 125/ CR 117, located on the South side of road for the purpose of obtaining access to property. Applicant submits herewith for the consideration and approval of the Board of County Commissioners, a sketch of the propo~ed installation showing all the necessary specification detail including: 1. Frontage oflot along road. · 2. Distance from centerline of road to property line. 3. Number of driveways requested· 4. Width of proposed driveways and angle of approach. 5. Distance from driveway to road intersection, if any. 6. Size and shape of area separating driveways if more than one approach. 7. Setback distance ofbuilding(s) and other structure improvements. 8. No unloading of equipment on county road, any damage caused to county road will be repaired at subdivision expense. 9. Responsible for two years from the date of completion. General Provisions I) The applicant represents all parties in interest, and affirms that the driveway approach (es) is to be constructed by him for the bona fide purpose of securing access to his property and not for the purpose of doing business or servicing vehicles on the road right of way. 2) The applicant shall furnish all labor and materials, perform all work, and pay all costs in connection with the construction of the driveway(s). All work shall be completed within thirty (30) days of the permit date. 3) The type of construction shall be as designated and/or approved by the Board of County Commissioners or their representative and all materials used shall be of satisfactory quality and subject to inspection and approval of the Board of County Commissioners or their representative. 4) The traveling public shall be protected during the installation with proper warning signs and signals and the Board of County Commissioners and their duly appointed agents and employee shall be held harmless against any action for personal injury or property damage sustained by any reason of the exercise of the Permit. 5) The Applicant shall assume responsibility for the removal or clearance of snow, ice, or sleet upon any portion of the driveway approach (es) even th<;mgh deposited on the driveway(s) in the course of the County snow removal operations. r-::,\ 6) In the event it becomes necessary to remove any right-of-way fence, the posts on either side of the entrance shall ~ be surely braced before the fence is cut to prevent any slacking of the remaining fence and all posts and wire removed shall be turned over to the District Road Supervisor of the Board of County Commissioners. 7) No revisions or additions shall be made to the driveway(s) or its appurtenances on the right-of-way without written permission of the Board of County Commissioners. 8) Provisions and specifications outlined herein shall apply on all roads under the jurisdiction ofthe Board of County Commissioners of Garfield County, Coldrado, and the Specifications, set forth on the attached hereof and incorporated herein as conditions hereof. 9) Final inspection of driveway will be required upon completion and must be approved by person issuing permit or representative of person issuing permit. The inspection and sign off must be done prior to any CO from the Building and Planning Department being issued. 10) Contractor agrees to all Provisions in Exhibit A . . .Special Conditions: 1. Driveway Width-50ft 2. Culvert required? True Size: 18 inch by 40ft 3. Asphalt or concrete pad required? True Size of pad: 30ft Wide x lOft long x 4iu thick 4. Gravel portion required? False Length: 5. Trees, brush and/or fence need to be removed for visibility? False 6. Distance and Direction: 7. Certified Traffic Control Required? False 8. Work zone signs required? True In signing this application and upon receiving authorization and permission to install the .driveway approach ( es) described herein the Applicant signifies that he has read, understands and accepts the foregoing provisions and conditions and agrees to construct e d ·vewaY, s) in accordance with the accompanying specification plan reviewed and approved by the Board of County Commissioners. Address: Telephone Number: C[-:Jo-2;n,y= CfG??p Permit granted 2/19/2008, subject to the provisions, specifications and conditions stipulated herein. For Board of County Commissioners' of Garfield County, Colorado: i1 o/JvJ&dl J Representative of Garfield County Road and Bridge Signature (!}J I :=J,A~ -.:£ !}t<r:..w !1/C:. J)f<Jv6w,r;,y )-ovt np.J Q.J /JI;t:, fLAN 1!>1!/:.C::J O"'.J M.'j ~!TIE VI~;/, I I I I I Garfield Application for Driveway Permit S~&J. Person Obtaining Permit:-&· : JJJ Lister Applicqtion Date: 2/1912008 County Road Number: 125 District: Glenwood Permit Number: GRBOB-D-20 Termination Date: 4119/2008 Inspector: Wyatt Keesbery hereby requests permission and authority from !he Board of Cot:mty Commissioners to construct a driyeway approach.( es) on-the right-Of-way off of County Road~ lOOSft East of CR 125/ CR 117, located on the South side of road for the purpose of obtaining access to property. Applicant submits herewith for the consideration and approval of the Board of County Commissioners, a sketch of the propo~ed installation showing all the necessary specification detail including: 1. Frontage oflot along road. · 2. Distance from centerline of road to property line. 3. Number of driveways requested 4. Width of proposed driveways and angle of approach. 5. Distance from driveway to road intersection, if any. 6. Size and shape of area separating driveways if more than one approach. 7. Setback distance ofbuilding(s) and other structure improvements. 8. No unloading of equipment on county road, any damage caused to county road will be repaired at subdivision expense. 9. Responsible for two years from the date of completion. General Provisions 1) The applicant represents all parties in interest, and affirms that the driveway approach ( es) is to be constructed by him for the bona fide purpose of securing access to his property and not for the purpose of doing business or servicing vehicles on the road right of way. 2) The applicant shall furnish all labor and materials, perform all work, and pay all costs in connection with the construction of the driveway(s). All work shall be completed within thirty (30) days of the permit date. 3) The type of construction shall be as designated and/or approved by the Board of County Commissioners or their representative and all materials used shall be of satisfactory quality and subject to inspection and approval of the Board of County Commissioners or their representative. 4) The traveling public shall be protected during the installation with proper warning signs and signals and the Board of County Commissioners and their duly appointed agents and employee shall be held harmless against any action for personal il"\iury or property damage sustained by any reason of the exercise of the Permit. 5) The Applicant shall assume responsibility for the removal or clearance of snow, ice, or sleet upon any portion of the driveway approach (es) even th<:Jngh deposited on the driveway(s) in the course of the County snow removal operations. 6) In the event it becomes necessary to remove any right-of-way fence, the posts on either side of the entrance shall be surely braced before the fence is cut to prevent any slacking of the remaining fence and all posts and wire removed shall be turned over to the District Road Supervisor of the Board of County Commissioners. 7) No revisions or additions shall be made to the driveway(s) or its appurtenances on the right-of-way without written permission of the Board of County Commissioners. 8) Provisions and specifications outlined herein shall apply on all roads under the jurisdiction of the Board of County Commissioners of Garfield County, Coldrado, and the Specifications, set forth on the attached hereof and incorporated herein as conditions hereof. 9) Final inspection of driveway will be required upon completion and must be approved by person issuing permit or representative of person issuing permit. The inspection and sign off must be done prior to any CO from the Building and Planning Department being issued. 10) Contractor agrees to all Provisions in Exhibit A . .. Special Conditions: 1. Driveway Width-50ft 2. Culvert required? True Size: 18 inch by 40ft 3. Asphalt or concrete pad required? True Size of pad: 30ft Wide x lOft long x 4in thick 4. Gravel portion required? False Length: 5. Trees, brush and/or fence need to be removed for visibility? False 6. Distance and Direction: 7. Certified Traffic Control Required? False 8. Work zone signs required? True In signing this application and upon receiving authorization and permission to install the driveway approach (es) described herein the Applicant signifies that he has read, understands and accepts the foregoing provisions and conditions and agrees to construct e dr. · vewax s) in accordance with the accompanying ~pecification plan reviewed and approved by the Board of County Commissioners. Address: Telephone Number: C[':Jo-2?lzv-fjG?l(- Permit granted 2/19/2008, subject to the provisions, specifications and conditions stipulated herein. For Board of County Commissioners' of Garfield County, Colorado: /{\ b17JJ44ll) Representative of Garfield County Road and Bridge Signature No. . , Assessor's Parcel No. ;:1.-J <t $-{OJ.,-0o -{ <.Jt • ~-.. ' . . :...<?B jJ Date *3. / J-.rj 0 .Y ~ ?~ at.l:ti~RMIT CARD . JobAddr~ o;;;;.15" C/.rJ-s G~s. <::b'/f&.o/ I~!J. ~ Owner 6L~ (~ Address fd,<£CvZ ff"'"6; GS 3'/fooJ Phone f!.1o-) 7Cf-'f[, 7'/ ~--· Contractor ~( ~ Address ~ a.:J ~hone# J'JCJ_ct'f'f? ,___ Setbacks: Front Rear RH LH Zoning ___ _ ptf O)IC.c;xaoo£.rl. UC l C:eJJ.A&~~==:t:I~SPECTIONS :5?Z'v/;Z. ·z_ 7 cf--J?' ~ 7 'f-. Soils Test . ~~ Weatherproofing _________ _ Footing /cJ .-2, ... tl*i3' Vft~ dt<jij11(L · Mechanicai _____ -=------===---- Foundation 10-;?..f-:~R~ Electrical Rough (State) S-.3-0? Grout 1 Electrical Final (State) b -30 -o_'L Underground Plumbing /-/1-·-t?9'yaf"' Final7 Htl.OC1 /Checklist Completed?.,...J...._W_,___ Rough Plumbing ~-~· -~· l)ii{ Certificate Occupan.cy # ( e3o:z. Framing tZ -"2._&-~ ____:--~ Date l SSU.E1::2 /.! 7 .Oj Insulation £ -~ Septic System # !'c.f ;"f . \ Roofing . . . . . Date 3_J.~/c)f' (~~ Drywall · -6WR, u:>W. &¥6.·-o? tf-o/Finai_ ___ ----=-------- Gas Piping S-f-0 9' ·lfhYl . Other efvv..v~ fj.K_f$0§-~ Z/l'-f(v~ ~ ~ 1D fT:Nor•• ~.#-,_ ~~~:'}]4 ~ ~~ ~~tAU ?(PflJ~:;~'fnunueonbac~~ ····················-~-- EXTERIOR Address No.--------------- Drainage -------------1---- Decks-support & clearance to wood --,----;''----- Decks-stairs & rails _______ · +[__,/,_ ___ _ Exterior locks -----'-----\7"'------ Fiashing around doors & windows-------- Insect screens-------------- INTERIOR GARAGE Fire wall separation ----------1---- Service doors-HII" min. -------l-1--,1-/ __ _ Door (20 min.) w/auto closer-1%'' min._--\\,-~-/ ___ _ v Mech. equip. 18" above floor ________ _ No opening into sleeping area_--, ______ _ BASEMENT-CRAWL AREA Access ____________ !-) ___ _ Insulation _________ t\---7/'------ Headroom/Stairs _______ V_::__ ____ _ Ventilation --------------- FINAL CHECKLIST MECHANICAL ROOM Boiler ____________ _ Hot water ___________ _ F.A. gas/oii•--------,----- Fioor draint _______ .;./ ___ _ Clearance• ______ ')!-,.</'-------v Air con. system•---------- Hot water heater---------- Combustion air· _________ _ Gas piping, valves ________ _ LPG Drain------------ FIREPLACE/STOVE Clearance to combustibles ____ ,_/ __ Termination of chimneyr ___ __,...---1/ __ _ Combustion air·-------1-1-+/ __ _ v Hearth (12" or 20" on sides)------ Glass doors __________ _ Certified by:~---------- i -~. STAIRWAYS . Headroom (6'6") -------tf'(_'_· ___ _ Railing & guardrails ----IC~f-j ____ _ Width'----'-------'(7;:::_ ____ _ Rise & run------------- KITCHEN / Clearance above grill ___ --\1/h"(_'_ ___ _ Exhaust fan------------- Broiler exhaust (1 hr. chase)------- BEDROOMS / Egress _________ (/h.L---- Smoke detector----------- BATHROOMS L/ Exhaust fan ______ _:._...jt;,~-(_'_ __ _ Shatterproof glass __________ _ OTHER REMARKS ylV, Or /lot/S/;p;{? j;/s;aN/A #z_IY4g ifA/ff IP 19'fbg7 f//B aa-Ak~ 335""4-" .. '."~' ,., . . ,._, BUILD IN PERMIT GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO Date IssuedJ.~~~~-.. Zoned Area ............................... P~rmit No .... ../.9.,8.1.1. ..... . AGREEMENT In consideration of the issuance ofthis \1rrmit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with all laws and regulations related to th~ ~0!' :acation; construction and erection of the proposed structure for which this permit is gn ,,,<J, ami further agrees that if the above said regulations are not fully complied with. in the zoning, location, erection and constn>r.tion of the above described structure, the permit may then be revoked by notice from the County Building Inspector and IMMEDIATELY BECOME NULL t\ND VOID. use -sj'f: 0\),)eU.i>l<f (l)Ylc~w,( 1'lare w/rN' dec J: t of/or lid 9oRaCj'f' Address or Legal Description · ~U .l:.f__j_'t,<;;,_,(i"'-IJ-"-S""-'')'-------------- Owner Lr:>\~>r; '7>V::f>\'\e'!l CQntractor fcttrr em 'Db Ss.l.!lru;_l>s__ _____ £.Fr"'o""nt.__ ___ "'Si"'d"-e ·---~--'S"'illide.___---,---,--JR"'e,;,aLr _______ _ '"':'~;.s-c .• ;.:.: ~ .. -:: ·.:.:-~· ::s·.~-:~::.,,.; .-:'~: --.-;~,_ i. ~;;, :·.;_:..,..:_,. ~·-~.,...;:J .·.; · .._ .. l..i ... 1 .. l .r .;.;:.,·-;:;"t·~et··u id.ii ·r~ri.tt 'ui.s)Jecuun. INSPECTION RECORD Footing 1<7-.:Z'"CJR' ~ (J/~dlcJ../C: Driveway Foundation/~~/-u~~ 67/1'-f/o'f '6-:c - Underground Plumbing /-/~-t>? 9_~ Insulation ~ ~1-6'1, l(}M.._ Rough Plumbing s·-I -oq ~ Drywall if Chimney & Vent S-1-oti Electric Final (bOJ{-?/i/f:to•'J,/ $1J (o f{ Gas Piping 5-I -DCj Dr\\ Final 7-/6 ~o 7' ~d! Electric Roi!gh (By State Inspectot)oV~ Septic Final ;!t-~~vf:J1 An 7:.\,::, "'' Framing £, -;!J o-C>?' o'i?[:-f<-/ . Notes:-{,~~~ 6/<-'0 (To include oofm place and Win ows :2. -!.J-<79~ and Doors installed}. · QA!f, ."boJ 6-/G-o'7~t:e/ ALL LISTED ITEMS MUST. BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE COVERJNG- WHETHER INTERJOR OR EXTERJOR, UNDERGROUND OR ABOVE GROUND. . THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE For Inspections Call384-5003 108 8th Street Glenwood Springs, Colorado APPROVED DO NOT DES,TROY THIS CARD Datef/~{Df syL\a£I)?OVJ} L..c-c · IF PLACED OUTSIDikovfR WITH CLEAR PLASTIC \ ~- COUNTY OF GARFIELD -BUILDING DEPARTMENT CORRECTION NOTICE 108 8th St., Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado Phone (970) 945-8212 Job located at ();;./5' C&t?.. r Permit No. I 0&71 ~~-------------------- I have this day inspected this structure and these premises and found the following corrections needed: )(call for Re-lnspection 0 $50.00 Re-lnspection Fee must be paid prior to Re-lnspection You are hereby notified that the above correction must be inspected before covering. When correction(s) have been made, call for inspection at 970-384-5003. Date ,!;< , 30-c:3 20 Building Inspector ~~·--=-0-:;-=-:-- Phone (970) 945-8212 C.OUNTY OF GARFIELD -BUILDING DEPARTMENT CORRECTION NOTICE 108 8th St., Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado Phone (970) 945-8212 Job located at c:::JZJO C tf? /;( £" Permit No. I 0';?/ f I have this day inspected this structure and these premises and found the following corrections needed: ].(call for Re-lnspection 0 $50.00 Re-lnspection Fee must be paid prior to Re-lnspection You are hereby notified that the above correction must be inspected before covering. When correction(s) have been made, call for inspection at 970-384-5003. Date 2~.Jo~ 20-r--""== Building Inspector~ Phone (970) 945-8212 COUNTY OF GARFIELD -BUILDING DEPARTMENT CORRECTION NOTICE 108 8th St., Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado Phone (970) 945-8212 Job located at _j0'='--'2"""--'-/-=~'-----c-'----<-"-· _._,_/-'Z:.=::..:=:s'------ Permit No. / CJ:? 7 ?" I have this day inspected this structure and these premises and found the following corrections needed: G-"Calltor Re-lnspection //;f £.-5~~/vt{f;.. J?o#£, 0 $50.00 Re-lnspection Fee must be paid prior to Re-lnspection You are hereby notified that the above correction must be inspected before covering. When correction(s) have been made, call for inspection at 970-384-5003. Date 5-:. 7. 2 20 () 7 Building Inspector---------------- Phone (970) 945-8212 COUNTY OF GARFIELD -BUILDING DEPARTMENT CORRECTION NOTICE 108 8th St., Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado Phone (970) 945-8212 ' Job located at ___ o--=Z'---'1_,-.::;,'-----'-C..,.<'"'-'''-'/'-. ..s.Z:..~.s-,_· ____ _ Permit No. /C 2 7 9 I have this day inspected this structure and these premises and found the following corrections needed: 0 $50.00 Re-lnspection Fee must be paid prior to Re-lnspecti'on You are hereby notified that the above correction must be inspected before covering. When correction(s) have been made, call for inspection at 970-384-5003. Date~ COUNTY OF GARFIELD -BUILDING DEPARTMENT CORRECTION NOTICE 108 8th St., Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado Phone (970) 945-8212 Job located at ~0=-Z~/ s-"": "-----"'C=-L;f-'--_L./_Z_· -=s=----- Permit No. _L;j~t?::.__.=::::£=-· _1_1-LL ________ _ I have this day inspected this structure and these premises and found the following corrections needed: OK 0 Call for Re-lnspection 0 $50.00 Re-lnspection Fee must be paid prior to Re-lnspection You are hereby notified that the above correction must be inspected before covering. When correction(s) have been made, call for inspection at 970-384-5003. Date --::::;-- COUNTY OF GARFIELD -BUILDING DEPARTMENT CORRECTION NOTICE 108 8th St., Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado Phone (970) 945-8212 Job located at ()5(./S C£'i&S: Permit No. ---~--'/'D~6)-1t-9J__ _________ _ I have this day inspected this structure and these premises ancyfound the foll~:ing_corr~ections ne~ded: J) ~I 1/b)U.e.-~ t4 ~--. 0 Call for Re-lnspection 0 $50.00 Re-lnspection Fee must be paid prior to Re-lnspection You are hereby notified that the above correction must be inspected before covering. When correction(s) have been made, call for inspection at 970-384-5003. Date /, -Z--?1~ 20 Building Inspector ~~ Phone (970) 945-8212 COUNTY OF GARFIELD -BUILDING DEPARTMENT CORRECTION NOTICE 108 8th St., Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado Phone (970) 945-8212 Job located at _::eO:..____c::<:f'-"/,-=;s-::::___~c==--C.,<~, _L/~Z:,_..SQ_-___ _ Permit No. /cJ z 7 ;7 --~~~~-------------- I have this day inspected this structure and these premises and found the following corrections needed: 0 Call for Re-lnspection 0 $50.00 Re-lnspection Fee must be paid prior to Re-lnspection You are hereby notified that the above correction must be inspected before covering. When correction(s) have been made, call for inspection at 970-384-5003. Building Inspector Phone (970) 945-8212 COUNTY OF GARFIELD -BUILDING DEPARTMENT CORRECTION NOTICE 108 8th St., Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado Pt:10ne (970) 945-8212 Job located at _0"""--=-z_;'-·=s-'----__ C=c:l(~;~zs-~----- Permit No. __ L._/,_£&~2""· -"Zc___,.z>,-:__ ________ _ I have this day inspected this structure and these premises and found the following corrections needed: 0 Call for Re-lnspection 0 $50.00 Re-lnspection Fee must be paid prior to Re-lnspection You are hereby notified that the above correction must be inspected before covering. When correction(s) have been made, call for inspection at 970-384-5003. Date C:z -_::3 0 20 0 r --"-~- Buildinglnspector ~~ ~ Phone (970) 945-8212 ~ c:.cb'd>tech August 24, 2001 Hepwc ,-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. 5020 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Phone: 970-945-7988 Fax: 970-945-8454 hpgeo@hpgeotecb.com Job No. 101 480 Subject: Subsoil Study for Foundation Design, Proposed Residence, Parcel 12, Faranhyll Rarteh, Dry Park Road, Garfield County, Colorado Dear Ms. Leighty: As requested, Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. performed a subsoil study for design of foundations at the subject site. The study was conducted in general accordance with our agreement for geotechnical engineering services to you dated June 28, 2001. The agreement was modified by you to exclude us performing percolation testing for the septic disposal system. The data obtained and our recommendations based on the proposed construction and subsurface conditions encountered are presented in this report. Potential geologic hazard impacts on the proposed development are beyond the scope of our work. Proposed Construction: The proposed residence will be a single story structure over a walk-out basement level located on the site as shown on Fig. 1. A detached garage is planned to the southeast of the residence. Ground floors·.~ill be slab-on-grade. Cut depths are expected to range between about 3 to 10 feet. Foundation loadings for this type of construction are assumed to be relatively light and typical of the proposed type of construction. If building conditions or foundation loadings are significantly different from those described above, we should be notified to re-evaluate the recounnendations presented in this report. Site Conditions: The site is vacant and located on moderately steep northeasterly facing hillside terrain .above Dry Park Road. Elevation difference across the proposed building site is on the order of 15 feet. The ground surface appears mostly natural in the building area and vegetated with thick oak and other brush. The driveway and parking areas have been rough graded through the lo'\Ver part of the property with generally shallow cuts and fills. The soils exposed in the cuts below the building site Mava Leighty August 24, 2001 Page 2 consist primarily of stiff sandy silty clay with minor areas of bedrock or rock fragments. Subsurface Conditiom: The subsurface conditions at the site were evaluated by excavating two exploratory pits at the approximate locations shown on Fig. 1. The pits were excavated with a trackhoe prior to our site visit. The logs of the pits are presented on Fig. 2. The subsoils encountered, below about lh to 1 foot of topsoil, consist of medium dense, silty clayey sand and gravel with cobbles at Pit 1 and stiff, sandy to very sandy silty clay at Pit 2. The sand and gravel at Pit 1 was underlain by weathered sandstone/siltstone bedrock at about 2 feet depth and extended to the pit depth of 4 feet. . The silty clay at Pit 2 extended to the pit depth of 6 feet. Results of swell-consolidation testing performed on relatively undisturbed samples of the silty clay subsoils, presented on Fig. 3, indicate low compressibility under existing moisture conditions and light loading and moderate settlement when loaded after wetting. The laboratory testing is summarized in Table I. No free water was observed in the pits and the soils and bedrock materials were slightly moist. Foundation Recommendations: Considering the subsoil conditions encountered in the exploratory pits and the nature of the proposed construction, we recommend spread footings placed on the undisturbed natural soil or bedrock materials designed for an allowable bearing pressure of 2000 psf for support of the proposed. The clay soils may tend to compress after wetting and there could be some post-construction foundation settlement if the bearing soils become wetted. Precautions should be taken to prevent wetting of the bearing soils. Footings should be a minimum width of 18 inches for continuous walls and 2 feet for colunms. All topsoil and loose or disturbed soils encountered at the foundation bearing level within the excavation should be removed and the footing bearing level extended down to the undisturbed natural soils. The footing subgrade should then be moistened and compacted. Exterior footings should be provided with adequate cover above their bearing elevations for frost protection. Placement of footings at least 36 inches below the exterior grade is typically used in this area. Continuous foundation walls should be well reinforced top and bottom to span local anomalies such as by assuming an unsupported length of at least 12 feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining structures should also be designed to resist a lateral earth pressure based on an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 50 pcf for the on-site soil, excluding topsoil and oversized rocks, as backfill. H-P GEOTECH Mava Leighty August 24, 2001 Page3 Floor Slabs: The natural on-site soils and bedrock materials, exclusive of topsoil, are suitable to support lightly loaded slab-on-grade construction. To reduce the effects of some differential movement, floor slabs .should be separated from all bearing walls and columns with expansion joints which allow unrestrained vertical movement. Floor slab control joints should be used to reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking. The requirements for joint spacing and slab reinforcement should be established by the designer based on experience and the intended slab use. A minimum 4 inch layer of free-draining gravel should be placed beneath basement level slabs to facilitate drainage. This material should consist of minus 2 inch aggregate with less than 50% passing the No.4 sieve and less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve. All fill materials for support of floor slabs should be compacted to at least 95% of maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Required fill can consist of the on-site soils devoid of vegetation, topsoil and oversized rock. Underdrain System: Although free water was not encountered during our exploration, it has been our experience in the area and where clay soils and shallow bedrock are present that local perched groundwater can devi:lop during times of heavy precipitation or seasonal runoff. Frozen ground during spring runoff can also create a perched condition. We recommend below-grade construction, such as retaining walls·, crawlspace and basement areas, be protected from wetting and hydrostatic pressure buildup by an underdrain system. The drains should consist of drainpipe placed in the bottom of the wall backfill surrounded above the invert level with free-draining granular material. The drain should be placed at each level of excavation and at least 1 foot below lowest adjacent finish grade and sloped at a minimum 1% to a suitable gravity outlet. Free-draining granular material used in the underdrain system should contain less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve, less than 50% passing the No. 4 sieve and have a maximum size of 2 inches. The drain gravel backfill should be at least 1 Yz feet deep. Surface Drainage: Positive surface drainage is an important aspect of the project to prevent wetting of the soils below the building. The following drainage precautions should be observed during construction and maintained at all times afler the residence has been completed: H·P GEOTECH Mava Leighty August 24, 2001 Page 4 1) Inundation of the foundation excavations and_underslab areas should be avoided during construction. 2) Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density in pavement and slab areas and to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density in landscape areas. Free-draining wall backfill should be capped with about 2 feet of the on-site, finer graded soils to reduce surface water infiltration. 3) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions. We recommend a minimum slope of 12 inches in the first 10 feet in unpaved areas and a minimum slope of 3 inches in the first 10 feet in pavement and walkway areas. A swale will be needed uphill to direct surface runoff around the residence. 4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill. 5) Landscaping which requires regular heavy irrigation, such as sod, should be located at least 5 feet from the building. LimitationS: This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no warranty either expressed or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the exploratory pits excavated at the locations indicated on Fig. 1 and to the depths shown on.Fig. 2, the proposed type of construction, and our experience in the area. Our findings include interpolation and extrapolation of the subsurface conditions identified at the exploratory pits and variations in the subsurface conditions. may not become evident until excavation is performed. If conditions encountered during construction appear different from those described in this report, we should be notified at once so re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes. We are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. As the project evolves, we should provide continued consultation and field services during construction to review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations, and to verify that the recommendations have been appropriately interpreted. Significant design H-P GEOTECH Mava Leighty August 24, 2001 PageS changes may require additiorial analysis or modifications to the recommendations presented herein. We recommend on-site observation of excavations and foundation bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a representative of the geotechnical engineer. If you have any questions or if we may be of further assistance, please let us know. Sincerely, ~-P~ Steven L. Pawlak P. E. DAY/ksw attachments H-P GEOTECH 101 480 APPROXIMA 1E SCALE 1" = 200' 6550, 6525, 6~0 ' ' ' b'l';.. ' ' ' /:> -__ ...;::...,....-..;:;,.,~...:::...o:----, '1'~'-r ~ 6575, ', ' ' ~ . . ' ' ' ' ~- 6650 --...... ' ' ' ' ', 6675 .............. ,~, 6625~..: 6600 ..... , '~, ' v ------PROPOSED'-',, ' ' 6700-- - - ---. '-!ESl~ENC~ '-~ ~PI.;--2 --...... , , , Pl"f\.1 ,u·, ' \ \ ------' ' ' ' '\ ' ' / --' ' ' \. ' \ _._ ...__, '-'\ '\ '\ P~FQSED \ f --.--.. '-._ '\ '\. \ \ G AG'ls ................... , '\ \ ' \ \ -....... ....... ' ' . \\ \ \ \ \ f ' ', ',' \\ \ \ \ \ I ', ' \ \ \\ \ \ ' \ I ,-,' ' \ \ \\ \ \ '\ \ \ I \' \ \ \ \\ \ \ i '\\ \ '"''' ,, \\ \\ \ I \ '\ \\\ \\ \ \ \ \ I \ \\ \\ \\ \ \ ,,, \ ,,,,, \\\ ,,,, ,,,\, ,, \ \ \ \ , .... , \ \\\ \ \ \ \ \\\\I\\\\\\\\ ,, ,, \ \\\\\\\ \ \ \ \ \ 6825\ \ \ \ ', \ \ '\ \\ ,,, ,,,\ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ,, \ \ \ \\ \ \ \\ ,, \ \ \ \ \ ''-) \ \ \ \'\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ , '6700 \\\\ \\\ . ' \' \ \ ' \ \ , .... '-6725 \ \ ' 6800 ', ' '6750 \ ' 6775 .... 6750 ...... 6725 . ··<'6775 I 6800 PARCEL 12 BOUNDARY HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY PITS Fig. 1 G) of :5 a. .. c 0 10 LEGEND: PIT 1 ELEV.= 115' l'!c-4.2. 00=93 ~ TOPSOIL; organic silty clay, moist, dark brown. PIT 2 ELEV.= 100' 1'/c-4.9 00=93 1'/c-3.2. 00=101 -200=53 WC=9.8 00=103 D CLAY (CL); silty, sandy to very sandy, stiff, slightly moist, brown. 0 5 10 I SAND AND GRAVEL (SM-GM); with cobbles, silty, clayey, medium dense, slightly moist brown. SANDSTONE/SILTSTONE; weathered, medium hard to hard, slightly moist to dry, grey-brown, calcareous, bedding dip down to northeast. ~ 2" Diameter hand driven liner sample. NOTES: 1. Exploratory pits were observed on August 7, 2001 and had been dug with a backhoe. 2. Locations of exploratory pits were measured approximately by pacing from features on the site plan provided. 3. Elevations of exploratory pits were measured by instrument level and refer to Pit 2 as elevation 1 00' assumed. Logs are drawn to depth. 4. The exploratory pit locations and elevations should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. 5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory pit logs represent the approximate boundaries between material types and transitions may be graduaL 6. No free water was observed in the pits. Fluctuations In water level may occur with time. 7. Laboratory Testing Results: WC = Water Content ( % ) DO = Dry Density ( pcf ) -200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve 101 480 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. LOGS OF EXPLORATORY PITS Fig. 2 G) of .£: .... a. CD c 1: 0 0 li 2 [ s 3 0 4 0 1 ~ 1: 2 .Q Ill e c. E 3 8 4 5 101 480 0.1 ..-- 1-- 1-- f--· 1--·. f--· .. 0.1 Moisture Content = 4.9 percent Ory Density = 93 pcf Sample of: Sandy Silty Clay From: Pit 2 at 2 Feet ~ 1---1--r- 1\ No movement upon wetting \ \ 1~ 10 100 APPUED PRESSURE -ksf Moisture Content = 9.8 percent Dry Density = 103 pcf Sample of: Very Sandy Silty Clay From: Pit 2 at 5.5 Feet ,_. -1-f... ~ Compression .. upon wetting \ " \ ' ~ 1~ 10 100 APPUED PRESSURE -ksf :PWORTH-PAWLAK .OTECHNICAL, INC. SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Fig. 3 HEPWORTH-PAWlAK GEOTECHNICAl, INC. TABLE l JOB NO. 101 480 SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS SAMPLE LOCATION NATURAL NAlURAL GRADATION PERCENT ATIERBERG liMITS UNCONANED PIT DEPTH MOISTIJRE DRY GRAVEL SAND PASSING LIQUID PLASTIC COMPRESSIVE SOil OR {feet) CONTENT DENSITY 1%} (%} NO. 200 LIMIT INDEX STRENGTH BEDROCK TYPE (%} {pcf) SIEVE '"'' (%} !PSFI 1 1 Yz 4 .. 2 93 silty sand with rock fragments 2 2 4.9 93 sandy silty clay 3 3.2 101 53 very sandy silty clay 5% 9.8 103 sandy silty clay ' HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. 5020 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Phoneo 970-945-7988 Faxo 970-945-8454 email: hpgeo@hpgeotech.com GEOLOGIC SITE ASSESSMENT PARCEL 12 FARANHYLL RANCH DRY PARK ROAD GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO JOB NO. 107 0638 OCTORBER 16, 2007 PREPARED FOR: STEPHEN LISTER 125 COUNTY ROAD 156 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81601 Parker 303-841-7119 • Colorado Springs 719-633-5562 ° Silverthorne 970-468-1989 - 1 - TABLE OF CONTENTS PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY ........................................................................ - 2 - PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT .................................................................................. - 2 - SITE CONDITIONS ................................................................................................... - 2 - REGIONAL GEOLOGIC SETTING .......................................................................... -3- BUILDING SITE GEOLOGY .................................................................................... - 4 - ROCK FORMATIONS ........................................................................................... -4- SURFICIAL SOIL DEPOSITS ............................................................................... -5- GEOLGOIC SITE ASSESSMENT .......................................................................... : .. - 5 - ABANDONED BUILDING PAD SLOPE EROSION ............................................ -6- EARTHQUAKE CONSIDERATIONS ................................................................... -6- RADIATION POTENTIAL. ....................................................................................... -7- LIMITATIONS .......................................................................................................... -7- REFERENCES ........................................................................................................... - 9 - FIGURE 1 -PROJECT LOCATION FIGURE 2-GEOLOGICALLY YOUNG FAULTS AND LARGER HISTORIC EARTHQUAKES FIGURE 3-WESTERN COLORADO EVAPORITE REGION FIGURE 4-PROJECT SITE GEOLOGY MAP Job No. 107 0683 ~tech -2- PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY This report presents the findings of a geologic site assessment for a proposed house site on Parcel12, Faranhyll Ranch, Dry Park Road, Garfield County, Colorado. The project site is located about six miles south of Glenwood Springs, see Figure 1. The study was conducted to evaluate the geologic condition on the parcel and at the proposed building site and to assess if the geology could present constraints and potential risks to the proposed house. The study was performed according to our September 5, 2007 professional service agreement with Stephen Lister. A field reconnaissance of the project site was made on September 16, 2007 to observe and map the geology. In addition, we have reviewed published regional geology studies, looked at aerial photographs and reviewed our previous work on the parcel. In August 2001, we performed a subsoil study for foundation design for a different owner and at a different building site located upslope of the currently proposed building site (Hepworth- Pawlak Geotechnical, 2001). Based on this information, an assessment of the potential influence of the geology on the currently proposed house was made. This report summarizes our findings and presents our conclusions and reconnnendations. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The currently proposed house site has a foot print area of about 1,370 square feet. It will be located in the area of the existing driveway in the northeastern part of the property, see Figure 4. The on-site leach field will be located about 20 feet to the southeast of the house site. An existing well is located about 140 feet to the northwest of the leach field to the northwest of the house site. At the time of this study, grading plans for the house were not available. Relatively extensive grading is expected because of the steep slopes at the proposed house site. SITE CONDITIONS The 36 acre Parcel 12 is located at the north end of a prominent hogback just to the south of where Fourmile creek cuts through the hogback, see Figure 1. The property is located about six mile south of Glenwood Springs. The topography on the property is shown by Job No. I 07 0683 ~tech -3 - the contour lines on Figure 4. For the most part slopes are steep on most of the property and exceed 40 percent. The hillside in the vicinity of the proposed house site and leach field area are less steeply sloping and average about 30 percent based on the site specific topographic map prepared by Bookcliff Survey Services, Inc (2007). Major drainages do not cross through the property. A existing driveway that leads to an abandoned building pad is present in the vicinity of the currently proposed house site. Vegetation on the northeast facing hillside in the vicinity of the currently proposed house site is oak and other brush with some scattered juniper and conifer trees. Cut and fill slopes along the existing driveway are revegetated. Cuts slopes at the abandoned building pad are steep and have not been revegetated. The cuts appear to be globally stable but are eroding and raveling. REGIONAL GEOLOGIC SETTING The project site is located on the Grand Hogback monocline that forms the transition between the Southern Rocky Mountains to the east and the Colorado Plateau to the west, see Figure 2. The monocline is also the transition structure between the White River uplift to the northeast and the Piceance basin to the southwest, see Figure 3. The sedimentary rocks along the monocline in the project area strike nearly north-south and dip between 40 and 60 degrees to the west into the Piceance basin. The monocline and adjacent uplift and basin are regional geologic structures formed by compressional tectonics during the Laramide orogeny about 40 to 80 million years ago. Following the Laramide orogeny the region underwent a younger period of regional deformation related to evaporite tectonics that produced the Carbondale and Eagle evaporite collapse centers, see Figure 3. The project site is located near the southwestern limit of the Carbondale evaporite collapse center. The Carbondale evaporite collapse center covers about 460 square miles. As much as 4,000 feet of evaporite related subsidence has occurred near Carbondale in the central part of the collapse center during the past 10 million years. Much of the collapse appears to have occurred within the past 3 million years which also corresponds to high incision rates along the Colorado River and its tributaries (Kunk and Others, 2002). This indicates a long-term, regional subsidence rate in the central part of the collapse center ofbetween Job No. l 07 0683 ~tech -4- 0.5 and 1.6 inches per I 00 years. At the project site near the western limit of the collapse center, evaporite deformations are minor in comparison to deformations in the central part of the collapse center near Carbondale. If evaporite is present in the subsurface below the project site it lies at depth greater than 8,000 feet (Kirkham and Others, 1996). Several northwest-trending, flexural-slip faults related to evaporite tectonics are present about one mile to the west of the project site (Kirkham and Others, 1996). The flexural- slip faults are downthrown on their west sides and occur along the west dipping bedding planes in the sedimentary rocks that form the Grand Hogback monocline. The faults are associated with relaxation or unfolding of the monocline related to evaporite flowage from beneath the eastern part monocline into the Roaring Fork River valley. These faults may have been active during the early Quaternary but this is uncertain (Widmann and Others, 1998). Considering the nature of evaporite tectonics, the faults are not considered capable of generating large earthquakes if the faults are still active. The closest geologically young, post-glacial faults, considered capable of generation large earthquakes are in the Rio Grande rift to the east, see Figure 2. Post-glacial faults are present in the Williams Fork Mountains Fault Zone (Q50) about 66 miles to the northeast and in the southern section of the Sawatch Fault Zone (Q56b) about 70 miles to the southeast. At these distances, large earthquakes on these two fault zones would not produce ground shaking at the project site that is larger than that shown on the 2002 U. S. Geological Survey National Earthquake Hazard Map. BUILDING SITE GEOLOGY The main geologic features at the proposed house site and on the 36 acre Parcell2 are shown on Figure 4. This map is based on our field observations and is a modification of the regional geology map by Kirkham and Others (1996). ROCK FORMATIONS The hogback at Parcel 12 is underlain in descending stratigraphic order by the late Cretaceous-age Dakota Sandstone (Kd), the upper Jurassic-age Morrison Formation (Jm) and Entrada Sandstone (Je), the Triassic-and Permian-age Chinle and State Bridge Formations and the lower Permian-and Pennsylvanian-age Maroon Fonnation. The crest Job No. 107 0683 ~tech -5- of the hogback is formed by a resistant sandstone rn1it (Jms) in the Morrison Formation. The fonnation rock is usually covered by colluvium (Qc) on the sides of the hog back. Rock outcrops are common in the Dakota Sandstone on the west side of the hogback. The Entrada sandstone is exposed in the abandoned building pad to the southwest of the proposed house site. Bedding along the hogback strikes to the northwest and dips between 42 and 56 degrees to the southwest. The Chinle Fonnation and overlying colluvium and driveway fill will probably be encoru1tered in the foill1dation excavations at the currently proposed house site. The Chinle is a thin, even bedded, dark reddish-brown, orangish-red and purplish-red siltstone and mudstone with occasional, thin lenses of light purplish-red and gray limestone and limestonecpebble conglomerate (Kirkham and Others, 1996). SURFICIAL SOIL DEPOSITS Surficial soil deposits usually cover the formation rocks in the project area. These soils include colluvium (Qc), yorn1ger and older stream alluvium (Qal and Qa2), and a large landslide complex (QI) to the west of the project site. Colluvium covers the formation rock at the currently proposed house site. Exposures in the abandoned building pad and our previous exploratory pits in that area (Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, 2001) show that the colluvium on the lower northeast facing hillside is a sandy clay with angular rock fragments from gravel to boulder-size. Our previous laboratory testing shows that the colluvium is nonexpansive and does not have a collapse potential (Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, 2001). GEOLGOIC SITE ASSESSMENT The geologic conditions in the project area should not present major constraints or nnusually high risk to a house located at the currently proposed site shown on Figure 4. Site specific geotechnical engineering studies should be performed at the house site to develop foundation design information and information for site grading. Geologic Job No. 107 0683 ~tech -6- conditions that should be considered at the currently proposed house site are presented below. ABANDONED BUILDING PAD SLOPE EROSION The cut slopes at the abandoned building pad located upslope of the currently proposed house site are steep but appear to be globally stable with respect to a landslide type slope failure. In the unlikely event that a local slope failure were to occur it should not present a significant risk to the currently proposed house. These slopes are, however, erosionally unstable and are activelyr<lveliJ:lg/'Ifthis in not acceptable, the slopes should be stabilized and revegetated. Erosion stabilization can probably best be done by flattening the slopes with compacted fills placed along the base of the slopes. After the fill is placed it should be revegetated. EARTHQUAKE CONSIDERATIONS Historic earthquakes within 150 miles of the project site have typically been moderately strong with magnitudes less than M 5.5 and maximum Modified Mercalli Intensities less than VI, see Figure 2. The largest historic earthquake in the project region occurred in 1882. It was located in the northern Front Range and had a estimated magnitude of about M 6.2 and a maximum intensity of VII. Historic ground shaking at the project site associated with the 1882 and the other larger historic earthquakes in the region does not appear to have exceeded Modified Mercalli Intensity VI (Kirkham and Rogers, 1985). Modified Mercalli Intensity VI ground shaking should be expected during a reasonable exposure time for the house, but the probability of stronger ground shaking is low. Intensity VI ground shaking is felt by most people and causes general alarm, but results in negligible damage to structures of good design and construction. The house should be designed to withstand moderately strong ground shaking with little or no damage and not to collapse under stronger ground shaking. For firm rock sites with shear wave velocities of2,500 ips in the upper I 00 feet the U. S. Geological Survey 2002 National Seismic Hazard Map indicates that a peak ground acceleration of0.06g has a I 0% exceedence probability for a 50 year exposure time and a peak ground acceleration Job No. 107 0683 -7- of0.22 g has a 2% exceedence probability for a 50 year exposure time at the project site (Frankl and Others, 2002). This corresponds to a statistical recurrence time of about 500 years and 2,500 years, respectively. The soil profile at the house site should be considered as a 2006 International Building Code Class D site (stiff soil site) unless site specific studies show otherwise. RADIATION POTENTIAL Regional studies by the Colorado Geological Survey indicate that the closest radioactive mineral occurrences to the project site are located along the Grand Hogback monocline over 22 miles to the northwest of the project site (Nelson-Moore and Others, 1978). Regional studies by the U. S. Geological Survey for the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) indicate that the project site is in a part of Colorado with a high radon gas potential (Dubiel, 1993). The 1993 EPA regional radon study considered data from (1) indoor radon surveys, (2) aerial radioactivity surveys, (3) the general geology, (4) soil permeability estimates, and (5) regional architectural practices. It is not possible to accurately assess future radon concentrations in buildings before they are constructed. Accurate tests of radon concentrations can only be made when the buildings have been completed. Because of this, new buildings in moderate to high radon areas are often designed with previsions for ventilation ofthe lower enclosed areas should post construction testing shows unacceptable radon concentrations. LIMITATIONS This study was conducted according to generally accepted engineering geology principles and practices in this area, at this time. We make no wauanty either express or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are based on our field observations, our previous work on the parcel and our experience in the area. They apply only to the currently proposed house site shown on Figure 4. The information presented in this report has been prepared exclusively for our client. It is suitable for the evaluation of the potential influence of the geology at the currently proposed house site. We are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. Geotechnical Job No. 107 0683 ~tech -8- engineering studies should be performed at the currently proposed house site to evaluate site specific subsoil and foundation conditions. Respectfully submitted, HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. ;t/Lt.t.ft ~ 1.?1~~ Ralp~.~~ck Engineering Geologist Reviewed by: \:' Daniel E. Hardin, P.E. RGM/cay Job No. l 07 0683 -9- REFERENCES BookcliffSurveying Services, 2007, Site Planfor Parcel12, Faranhyll Ranch: Prepared for Stephen Lister, Glenwood Springs, Colorado (Project No. 07178-01, August 13, 2007). Dubiel, R. F., 1993, Preliminary Geologic Radon Potential Assessment of Colorado in Geologic Radon Potential EPA Region 8, Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah and Wyoming: U. S. Geological Survey Open File Report 93- 292-H. Frankel, A. D. and Others, 2002, Documentation for the 2002 Update of the National Seismic Hazard Maps: U.S. Geological Survey Open File Report 02-420. Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, 2001, Subsoil Study for Foundation Design, Proposed Residence, Parcel12, Faranhyll Ranch, Dry Park Road, Garfield County, Colorado: Prepared for Mava Leighty, Glenwood Springs, Colorado (Job No. 101 480, August 24, 2001 ). Kirkham, R. M. and Rogers, W. P., 1985, Colorado Earthquake Data and Interpretations 1867 to 1985: Colorado Geological Survey Bulletin 46. Kirkham, R. M. and Others, 1996, Geology Map of the Cattle Creek Quadrangle, Garfield County, Colorado: Colorado Geological Survey Open File 96-1. Kirkham R. M. and Others, 2002, Evaporite Tectonism in the Lower Roaring Fork River Valley, West-Central Colorado, in Kirkham R. M., Scott, R. B. and Judkins, T. W. eds., Late Cenozoic Evaporite Tectonism and Volcanism in West-Central Colorado: Geological Society of America Special Paper 366, Boulder, Colorado. Kirkham, R. M. and Scott, R. B., 2002, Introduction to Late Cenozoic Evaporite tectonism and Volcanism in West-Central, Colorado, in Kirkham R. M., Scott, R. B. and Judkins, T. W. eds., Late Cenozoic Evaporite Tectonism and Volcanism in West-Central Colorado: Geological Society of America Special Paper 366, Boulder, Colorado. Kunk, M. J., and Others, 2002, 40Arl9 Ar Ages of Late Cenozoic Volcanic Rocks within and Around the Carbondale and Eagle Collapse Centers, Colorado: Constraints on the Timing of Evaporate-Related Collapse and Incision of the Colorado River, in Kirkham R. M., Scott, R. B. and Judkins, T. W. eds., Late Cenozoic Evaporite Tectonism and Volcanism in West-Central Colorado: Geological Society of America Special Paper 366, Boulder, Colorado. Nelson-Moore, J. L. and Others, 1978, Radioactive Mineral Occurrences in Colorado: Colorado Geological Survey Bulletin 40, 1,054 p. Tweto, 0. and Others, 1978, Geology Map of the Leadville 1 EX 2E Quadrangle, Northwestern Colorado: U.S. Geological Survey Map I-999. Widmann B. L. and Others, 1998, Preliminary Quaternary Fault and Fold Map and Data Base o.f Colorado: Colorado Geological Survey Open File Report 98-8. Job No. 107 0683 Note: Project site is located in Section 10, Township 7 South, Range 89 West, Garfield County, Colorado. 107 0683 0 4000 Scale: 1 in. = 4000 ft. Contour Interval= 40ft. Figure 1 88 5.5 Intermountain Seismic Belt UT. 1984 M5.1 Wyoming Rio Blanco \ Explosion) 973 M5.7 * Grand J~ctlon Dell<tJ Montroseo CO. 0 Cortez 020'- 0 Durango Explanation: 0 * Post~Giacial Faults: Fault younger than about 15,000 years. Larger Historic Earthquakes: Earthquakes wlth maximum Intensity greater than VI or magnitude greater than M 5.0 from 1867 to present. Nuclear Explosion: Large underground nuclear explosion for natural gas reservoir enhancement Laramie Mtn. 1984 M5.5 VI 150m!les Dulce 1966 M5.1 VII M VI Walden 0 ~ ~ ~ "" Kremmling ~ 0 Alamosa Historic Seismic Zones: ' Q69d Areas with historically high seismic activity. Local, surface wave or body wave magnitude Modified Mercalli intensity References: Widmann and Olhers (1998) U. S. Geological Survey Earthquake Catalogs Faranhyll Ranch Parcel 12 0 I WY. cc Great Pueblo 0 Walsenburg 0 DTrinldad 50 mi. I Scale: 1 in. = 50 mi. Geologically Young Faults and Larger Historic Earthquakes 107 0683 ~tech HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL Figure 2 ~ 0 ..... 0 "' co w ~ * 3 () 0 " "' iil ::l ::T 0~ iil ;o 0. 0 "' ::l ~ " ::T ""0 "C 0 "' "· Cl a; @. ;o ~ "' "' co c;· ::l Explanation: *Project Site Rlfle • 10 Mires References: ShaUow Evaporite in Eagle Valley Formation and Eagle Valley Evaporite. Basin Tweto and Others (1978) Kirkham and Scott (2002} River Uplift Aspen ~ Marble Eagle Collapse Center van & ;u " ::l "' (j) )> ::l "" g. ::l Cl) Qa2 Explanation: [§£]Colluvium 1 Qa1 1 Younger Alluvium k<'ltli'j Landslide 1 Qa2l Older Alluvium r:::KcV:'I Dakota Sandstone ~Morrison Formation I Jms I Resistant Sandstone Morrison Fm. 107 0683 ~tech Qa2 Qc/Jm\ L>J.e · .I Entrada Sandstone EJ Chinle and State Bridge Formations jpfPml Maroon Formation Contact: Approximate boundary of map units. Strike and Dip: Strike and dip of bedding in degrees. Faranhyll Ranch Parcel 12 Site Qc/PIPm 0 300ft. Scale: 1 in. = 300ft. Contour Interval: 40ft. October 2007 Figure 4 Job Truss Truss Type 38530 HM407106 HINGED MONO Qty Ply 1 1 Magnolia 223 CO MAG-5221 Ref. #2233090 Universal Forest Products Inc., Grand Rapids, Ml 49525, Weston Gorby 6.300 e Jul 11 2006 MiTek Industries, Inc. Tue Nov 28 07:15:03 2006 Pa e 1 . -1-4-0 6-6-14 13-5-8 1-4-0 6-6-14 5.00[12 6-6-14 11-10-8 1-1 0-8 4-8-6 5-3-10 BEH18E 6 Optional Side Step Plate (patent pending) Joint 13 See A040903 (Detail A) for SideStep details Plate Offsets X 2:0-2-13 0-3-4 2:0-2-12 0-5-8 3:0-4-3 0-1-12 4:0-2-8 0-1-12 1-7-0 5:0-0-5 0-0-0 6:0-0-11 0-1-2 9:0-3-8 0-1-8 12:0-2-6 0-6-6 lOADING (psf) TCLL 45.0 (Roof Snow=45.0) TCDL 10.0 BCLL 10.0 BCDL 10.0 LUMBER SPACING 2-0-0 Plates-Increase 1.15 lumber Increase 1.15 Rep Stress lncr YES Code IBC20031TPI2002 CSI DEFl TC 0.77 Vert(LL) BC 0.79 Vert(TL) WB 0.90 Horz(TL) (Matrix) in (loc) 1/defl Ud PLATES -0.17 3-11 >942 240 MT20 -0.25 3-11 >633 180 Mll18 0.13 7 n/a nla Weight: 59 lb OP CHORD 2 X 6 SPF No.2 "Except* T1 2 X 4 SPF No.2 BRACING TOP CHORD Structural wood sheathing directly applied or 3-0-3 oc purlins, except end verticals. BOT CHORD 2 X 6 SPF No.2 "Except• 82 2 X4 SPF 1650F 1.5E, 85 2X4 SPF No.2 84 2 X4 SPF No.2 ;;JESS 2 X 3 SPF Stud "Except* W2 2 X 3 SPF No.2 REAC"OONS (lb/size) 2=969/0-3-8, 7=782/Mechanical Max Horz 2=408(1oad case 8) Max Uplift 2=-337{1oad case 8), 7=-322(1oad case 8) Max Gtav 2=1432(1oad case 13), 7=1111(1oad case 13) FORCES (lb)-Maximum Compression/Maximum Tension BOT CHORD WEBS Rigid ceiJing directly applied or 6-0-0 oc bracing. 1 Row at midpt +9, 6-7 OP CHORD 1-2=01128, 2~3=-804/90, 3-4=-1987/344, 4~5=-22110, 5-6=-181/143, 7-9=-1100/428, 9-13=-476/241, 6-13=-476/241 BOT CHORD 3-11=-626/1774, 10-11=-825/1774, 9-10=--611/1652, 2-12=-133/484, 3-12=-295/125, 7-8=-14/136, 8-10=0/13 BS 4-11=0/307, 4-9:;..18701659 REQUIRED FIELD"JOINT CONNECTIONS 13=476/241/0/0 OTES -MaXirilum COi"npression (Jb)/ Maximum Tension"(lb)/ MaximUm Shear(Jb)/ Maximuin MOmerlt (!~in) 1) Wind: ASCE 7-02; 110mph; h=30ft; TCDL=6.0psf; BCDL=6.0psf; Category ll; Exp C: enclosed; MWFRS gable end zone and C-C Exterior(2) zone; Lumber DOL=1.60 plate grip DOL=1.33. This truss is designed for C...C for members and forces, and for MWFRS for reactions specified. ) TCLL: ASCE 7-02; Pf=45.0 psf (flat roof snow); Category II; Exp C; Partially Exp.; Ct=1.1 3} Unbalanced snow loads have been considered for this design. r This truss has been designed for greater of min roof live load of 19.0 psf or 2.00 times flat roof load of 45.0 psf on overhangs non-concurrent with other live loads. 5) This truss has been designed as per IBC Sect 1605.3.1.1 Load reduction, for multiple live loads. ) All plates are MT20 plates unless otherwise Indicated. ) Sea BEH18 DETAILS for plate placement 8) Provisions must be made to prevent lateral movement of hinged member(s) during transportation. 9) All additional member connections shall be provided by others for forces as indicated. 1 O) Provide mechanical connection (by others) of truss to bearing plate capable of withstanding 337 lb uplift at joint 2 and 322lb uplift at joint 7. 11) This truss is designed In accordance with the 2003 lntemational Building Code section 2306.1 and referenced standard ANSI/TPI1. 12) This truss has been designed to meet the 2003 IBC Section 2308.10.7.1; 2003 IRC RB02.10.2 13) Take precaution to keep the chords in plane, any bending or twisting of the hinge plate must be repaired before the building is put Into service. 14) Based on: HM407105 15) Revision: Add~ SSP detail and additional Dado's. Universal Forest Products, Inc:. 2801 EAST BEL TUNE RD. NE A WARNING -Verify design parameters and READ NOTES PHONE (616}-384-6161 FAX (616}-365-0060 GRAND RAPIDS, Ml49505 This building component has only been designed for the loads noted on this drawing. Construction and lifting forces have not been considered. The bullder is responsible "for fitting methods and system design Builder responsibiilties are defined under section 23 ofTPI1~2002. This design is based only upon parameters shown, and Is for an individual building component to be installed and loaded vertically. Applicability of design parameters and proper incorporation of component is responsibifity of building designer-not truss designer. Bracing shown is for lateral support of individual web members only. Additional temporary bracing to insure stability during construction is the responsibillty of the erector. Additional permanent bracing of the overall structure is the responsibility of the building designer. For general guidance regarding tabricatlon,quality control, storage, delivery, erf)CI:ion and bracing, consult BCSI1..Q3 from the Wood Truss Council of America and Truss Plate Institute Recommendation ava!iable from WfCA. 6300 Ente rise LN. Madiosn, WJ 53719 J:\su rt\MilekSu \!em lates\uf .I . ht 2006 b • Universal Forest Products, Inc. GRIP .1971144 1411138 ,, F VTR Kitchen ss --= 1 1/2" Pipe ---2" Pipe = 3" Pipe 1/2 BATH VTR Lov MASTER BATH VTR c w.c. TUB 00 G -Woter Inlet 1/2" Water Line (Cold) 1/2~ Water line (Hot) 3/4" Water Line (Cold) = ~/4" Water Line (Hot) ICE Tub • I TO .BASEMENT I I I I I r-----------------------F=-3= I I I I I I I I I 0 I I ================~--------, I I I I I Lov 1 lov • w.c. ~ KITCHEN I I I ! Lov • • -Water Line Riser 0 Frost F'ree Faucet (Front) ® = Water Line Riser 0 Frost Free Faucet (Rear) 1:81 Water Line Crossover 1:81 Dishwasher 1:81 All Fixures Toke Shutoff Values w.c. F, F, & P, INC. M .. nnnHA P.O. BOX 6S7, GERING, 69341 ~JOB LISTER I TITJ.E .. ·-· I MODE~-•.. .. IORAWlNG Nl Parcel Detail Page 1 of3 Garfield County Assessor/Treasurer Parcel Detail Information Assessor/Treasurer Property Search I Assessor SubseLQliro I Assessor Sales Search Clerk & Recorder Reception s_earch Basic Building_Chm:acteristics I Tax Information Parcel PeJail I ValJle Detail I SalesJ)etail I ResidentialLCommeJ:~;jal Improvement Detail Land Detail I Photograpb_s I Tax Area II Account Number II Parcel Number II 2007 Mill Levy I I 008 II R081012 II 239510200141 II 60.596 I Owner Name and Mailing Address JusTER, STEPHEN J & STEPHANIE R J125 CNTY RD 156 JGLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 Assessor's Parcel Description (Not to be nsed as a legal description) JsECT,TWN,RNG:10-7-89 DESC: A PCL IN JLOTS 1 THRU 4 OF SEC. 10 DESC: AKA IP ARCEL #12 FARANHYLLRANCfE IPRE:R080858 BK:1004 PG:0947 BK:1004 JPG:0932 BK:0852 PG:0402 BK:0788 JPG:0620 BK:0371 PG:0072 BK:1875 IPG:616 RECPT:713476 BK:1345 PG:929 jRECPT:601290 BK:1277 PG:749 IRECPT:586355 BK:0857 PG:0762 Location I Physical Address: JJGLENWOOD SPRINGS I Subdivision: J I Land Acres: JJ36.001 II http:/ /www.garcoact.com/assessor/parcel.asp?Parce1Number=23951 0200141 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 3/10/2008 Parcel Detail Page 2 of3 I Land Sq Ft: llo I Section II Township II Range I I 10 II 7 II 89 I 2007 Property Tax Valuation Information II Actual Value II Assessed Value I I Land: 6ooll 1701 I Iml!rovements: II oil ol I Total: 6ooll 1701 Sale Date: 1112/15/2006 Sale Price: 11222,500 Basic Building Characteristics Number of Residential io I Buildings: Number ofCommllnd 0 Buildings: No Building Records Found Tax Information I Tax Year I Transaction Ty!!e · I Amount I 2007 Tax Payment: Whole ($10.32)1 2007 Tax Amount $10.321 2006 Tax Payment: Whole ($10.80)1 2006 Tax Amount $10.801 2005 Tax Payment: Whole ($10.80)1 2005 Tax Amount $10.801 2004 Tax Payment: Whole ($10.22)1 2004 Tax Amount $10.221 2003 Tax Payment: Whole ($5.00)1 2003 Tax Payment: Whole ($9.02)1 2003 Tax Amount $5.ool 2003 Tax Amount II $9.021 2002 Tax Payment: Whole II {$5.0021 2002 II Tax Payment: Whole II ($9.24)1 http:/ /www.garcoact.com/assessor/parcel.asp?ParcelNumber=23951 0200141 3/10/2008 Parcel Detail I 2002 II Tax Amount II $s.ool I 2002 II Tax Amount II $9.241 I 2001 II Tax Payment: Whole II ($5.00)1 2001 II Tax Payment: Whole II ($9.28)1 2001 II Tax Amount II $s.ool 2001 II Tax Amount II $9.281 2000 II Tax Payment: Whole II ($10.56)1 2000 II Tax Amount II $10.561 I 1999 II Tax Payment: Whole II ($5.00)1 I 1999 II Tax Payment: Whole II ($9.74)) I 1999 II Tax Amount II $9.741 I 1999 II Tax Amount II $s.ool IopofPa~ ~essor Database Search OJ2tions I Treasurer_Database Searcb,_Qptions Clerk & Recorder Database Search Options Page 3 of3 The Garfield County Assessor and Treasurer's Offices make every effort to collect and maintain accurate data. However, Good Turns Software and the Garfield County Assessor and Treasurer's Offices are unable to warrant any of the information herein contained. Copyright © 2005 -2008 Good Turns Software. All Rights Reserved. Database & Web Design by Qood~Softwm:e. http:/ /www.garcoact. com/assessor/parcel. asp ?ParcelN urnber=23 9 51 0200141 3/10/2008