Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1.0 ApplicationSmall Contractors Yard Administrative Review: 01/29/15 Property: 013114 Highway 82 Carbondale, CO 81623 Applicant: All Valley Storage/Crystal Ranch Corp. Contact: Travis Stewart Email: tjs@ws-materials.com Cell: 970.309.1515 Contractors Storage Yard Application 12015 Table of Contents: Application Form and Fee [ 2 ] Agreement to Pay Form [3 ] Deed [4 ] Statement of Authority & Letter of Authorization [5 ] Mineral Owners of Record [6 ] Adjacent Property Owners [7 ] Project Narrative [8 ] Copy of Pre -Application Conference Summary [10 ] 4-203.C. Vicinity Map [11 ] 4-203.D./.E. Site Plan & Grading/Drainage Plans [12 ] 4-203.G. Impact Analysis Summary [13 ] 2011 SUP Impact Analysis [14 ] 4-203.L. Traffic Letter [15 ] 4-203.M. Water Supply Plan / 4-203.N. Wastewater Supply Plan [16 Will Serve Letter [17 ] Section 7, Divisions 1,2,3 and 7-2001 [18 ] CTL Thompson Report [19 ] Sopris Engineering Report [20 ] Sample Property Lease [21 ] Signage Concept Images [22 ] Construction Schedule [23] CDOT Access Permit [24] Drainage Study [25] Garfield County Access Permit [26] Fifth Amendment to Lease Specifying Readymix Lease Area [27] Storm Water Management Plan [28] 11 Page Contractors Storage Yard Application 12015 Application Form and Fee: (attached) Wage Garfield County Community Development Department 108 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 (970) 945-8212 www.garfield-county.com ® ❑ Administrative_Revie_w • Development in 100 -Year Floodplain Development in 100 -Year Floodplain Variance Limited Impact Review � • E Major Impact Review • Code Text Amendment ❑ Amendments to an Approved LUCP • Rezoning ■ LIR ❑MIR • SUP ❑ Zone District❑ PUD ■ PUD Amendment • Minor Temporary Housing Facility • Administrative Interpretation • Vacation of a County Road/Public ROW Location and Extent Review ❑ Appeal of Administrative Interpretation Areas and Activities of State Interest • • • Comprehensive Plan Amendment ■ Accommodation Pursuant to Fair Housing Act Variance • Major ❑ Minor Pipeline Development • • • Time Extension (also check type of original application) Owner/Applicant Name: Crystal Ranch Corp Mailing Address: 13 Friday Lane Phone: ( 919 ) 619-3295 City: Chapel Hill State: NC Zip Code: 27514 E-mail: bhapgood@me.com Representative (Authorization Required) Name: Travis Stewart / ALL VALLEY STORAGE Phone: ( 970 ) 309-1515 Mailing Address: PO Box 1319 City: Carbondale State: CO Zip Code: 81623 E-mail: tjs@ws-materials.com • Project Name: All Valley Storage: Contractors Storage Yard Assessor's Parcel Number: 2 3 9 3 2 3 4 _ 0 0 - 1 3 1 Physica6lStraetAddress: 013114 HWY 82, Carbondale, CO 81623 Legal Description: Section: 23 Township: 7 Range:'88 Zone District: Rural (Rural Employment Center) Property Size (acres): 24 acres of 414.8 Total Existing Use: This portion of the property is part of the reclaimed Lafarge Gravel pit. There is no current use for this 5 acre section. Proposed Use (From Use Table 3-403): Small Contractors Storage Yard Description of Project: This application is for the construction of a 5 acre contractors storage yard. The property is already graded and will require only the following construction activities: gravel as needed for roads, fencing, lighting and security cameras. A minimal amount of grading will occur for drainage to ensure that the pre-existing drainage plan works correctly. gpt $Fk&ti1i Submission Requirements 0 The Applicant requesting a Waiver of Submission Requirements per Section 4-202. List: Section: Section: Section: Section: Waiver of Standards ❑ The Applicant is requesting a Waiver of Standards per Section 4-118. List: Section: Section: Section: Section: I have read the statements above and have provided the required attached information which is correct and accurate to the best of my knowledge. Signature of Property Owner Date File Number: - Fee Paid: $ Contractors Storage Yard Application 12015 Agreement to Pay Form: (attached) 31 Page Garfield County PAYMENT AGREEMENT FORM GARFIELD COUNTY ("COUNTY") and Property Owner ("APPLICANT") All Valley Storage agree as follows: 1. The Applicant has submitted to the County an application for the following Project: Small Contractors Yard Application -Crystal Ranch Corp. 2. The Applicant understands and agrees that Garfield County Resolution No. 2014-60, as amended, establishes a fee schedule for each type application, and the guidelines for the administration of the fee structure. 3. The Applicant and the County agree that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to ascertain the full extent of the costs involved in processing the application. The Applicant agrees to make payment of the Base Fee, established for the Project, and to thereafter permit additional costs to be billed to the Applicant. The Applicant agrees to make additional payments upon notification by the County, when they are necessary, as costs are incurred. 4. The Base Fee shall be in addition to and exclusive of any cost for publication or cost of consulting service determined necessary by the Board of County Commissioners for the consideration of an application or additional County staff time or expense not covered by the Base Fee. If actual recorded costs exceed the initial Base Fee, the Applicant shall pay additional billings to the County to reimburse the County for the processing of the Project. The Applicant acknowledges that all billing shall be paid prior to the final consideration by the County of any Land Use Change or Division of Land. I hereby agree to pay all fees related to this application: Billing Contact Person:Travis Stewart Billing Contact Address: PO BOX 1439 Phone: (970 ) 309-1515 City: Carbondale State: CO zip Code: 81623 Billing Contact Email: tjs@ws-materials.com & prippy@ws-concrete.com Printed Name of Person Authorized to Sign: Travis J. Stewart 01/29/15 (Signature) (Date) Contractors Storage Yard Application 12015 Deed: (see attached title information in Minerals and Ownership Section) 4IPage Contractors Storage Yard Application 12015 Statement of Authority & Authorization Letter (attached) 5IPage Authorization Letter Crystal River Corp- Contractor Storage Yard Application January 19, 2015 Ms. Tamra Allen Garfield County Building and Planning Department 108 8`h Street, Suite 201 RB: Crystal Ranch Corp Administrative Review- 5 Acre Contractors Storage Yard Dear Ms. Allen, This letter is to certify that Crystal Ranch Corp authorizes Travis Stewart of All Valley Storage, LLC to represent it for this Administrative Review -- 5 Acre Contractor Storage Yard to the Garfield County, Colorado Building and Planning Department. The Contact information for All Valley Storage is: Travis Stewart Manager All Valley Storage, LLC 0082 County Road 113 PO Box 1319 Carbondale, CO 81623 970-309-1515 tis@ws-materials.com Sincerely, Barbara Hapgood President, Crystal Ranch Corp. Garfield County STATEMENT OF AUTHORITY Pursuant to C.R.S. 538-30472, the undersigned executes this Statement of Authority on behalf of a4-4 STA RAfacA Cc+l4 , a (corporation, limited liability company, general partnership, registered limited liability partnership, registered limited liability limited partnership, limited partnership association, government agency, trust or other), an entity other than an individual, capable of holding title to real property (the "Entity"), and states as follows: The name of the Entity is C.R.* TA!.#1t$ C d` CAP and is formed under the laws of COL., 2A© The mailing address for the Entity is 13 F ti Pfq LA,>&e , ct RPC . 64 i +.i , *3 C .4 ; JH The name and/or position of the person authorized to execute instruments conveying, encumbering, or otherwise affecting title to real property on behalf of the Entity is SIAResoN P96.,abD , P Q (D T The limitations upon the authority of the person named above or holding the position described above to bind the Entity are as follows (if no limitations, insert "None"): 01$+JiOr Other matters concerning the manner in which the Entity deals with any interest in real property are (if no other matter, leave this section blank): EXECUTED this l ul+tday of J Vk\f Signature: Name (printe Title (if any): rr i; .a; ,20 1 , STATE OF VIC )SS, COUNTY OF G N -47e j The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this I 114‘day of T kilt' , 20 N by gu if,,fy., duet',.:./ , on behalf of Cp.1S 71-11-126-k It C CZ'? , a Witness my hand and official seal. Ivry commission expires: 12, V 1 (Date) .ter CI) L y .y CO (,) = Z • • • ✓F nasi 1718V09'121 COLORADO oeseu TYEI T OF REVENUE or*oehivEe 741 co itixzst-0aa5 raw State of Colorado 'asCarorroct corn PartnershiplS-Corp Income Tax Declaration for Electronic Filing When feasible attach in PDF format to your a -filed return Do not mail this form to the IRS or the Colorado Department of Revenue Retain with your records 1722 Tax Year Beginning 01/01/12 , Endtno 12/31/12 Name CRYSTAL RANCH CORP. Colorado Account Number Address 13112 STATE HIGHWAY 82 Federal Employer Identification Number 20-5781359 City CA BONDALE State CO ZIP 81623 Telephone Number Partl — Tax Return Information 1. Ordinary Income. from federal Schedule K 1 166 -312,166 2. Allowable deductions from federal Schedule K 2 381,319 3. Colorado Tax, line 11 on Colorado Form 106. if applicable 3 0 4. Colorado Payments. line 17 on Colorado Form 106 4 5. Amount You Owe. bre 24 on Colorado Farm 106 5 0 4- Refund fine 27 Colorado Form 106 6 t Part11 — Declaration of Taxpayer - Under penalty of penury. I rlectare that I am art officer a the company listed above ane the tnformab®n;Iovrdedd far electronic Mac ado the amounts shw,m in Part I above agree with lite amounts shown on the company's 2012 Federal/Colorado income Sax returns, and that said tax resume. statements. schedules and atutorimeras are true correct and compute to the best of my knowledge and bettef. I understand tical I (or my Electronic Return Originator (ER 01 if app1xabrey may be required to provide paper copies of this dedarauon. my returns, withholdlrig Statements. schedule and attachments upon request by the Colorado Department of Revenue at any time pun.. the period covered by me Colorado stakria of limitations - • j Date / Title .'D; —-- -.-.or r' 3 PRESIDE/TT rt111— Declaration of EROlPrlparerlTranamltter (Lf the transmitter dkl not prepare the tax return, check here ) el am rwl the preparer. 1 declare only that the amounts Shawn in Part 1 above agree with the amounts shown on the taxpayers 2012 Federal! Colorado income tax returns. if i am the prepare, under penalties of penury t declare that I have reviewed the above taxpayers 2012 Federal/ Colorado income tax returns and that the information provided lo me by the taxpayer and the amounts shown in Pari 1 above agree with the amounts shown on said tax returns, and that said tax returns, statements, schedules, and attachments are true, correct. and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief As prepare'', I further declare that I lave obtained the taxpayer's signature on this foam at the time 01 firing and have provided the taxpayer with copies of all forms and information filed, i also agree to maintain this signed Form (DR 8453P) for the period covered by mtie Colorado statute of Limitations, and to provide paper copies of this declaration, said returns. withholding statements. schedules. and attachments upon request by the Colorado Department of Revenue al arryr time during this period. ERO'S Signature -- Your Social Secunty Number Or Prepares flcatA i Number P00199021 Cherdc if also preparer X Date 09/13/13 14551 4911312053 11 24 AM rer•,n 8879-S Noe renere at the Treasury internal Revenue Semite IRS a -file Signature Authorization for Form 11205 Do not senor to the IRS. Keep for your record:. IR Information about Form 8879-8 end Its Instructions Is at www.irs.govfform1120s. For calendar year 2012. or tax year beginning ending Name sof oDrpwarlon CRYSTAL RANCH CORP. a H 15�a y 586: 2012 • Employer identification number 20-5701359 Part I Tax Return Information (Whole dollars only) 1 Gross receipts or sales less returns and allowances (Form 11205, line lc) 2 Gross profit (Form 11205, line 3) 3 Ordinary business income (loss) (Form 11205, 'line 21) 4 Net rental real estate income (loss) (Form 1120S, Schedule K, line 2) 5 Income (loss) reconciliation (Form 11205, Schedule K, line 18) 2 3 4 5 -312,166 -2,826,453 Part 11 Declaration and Signature Authorization of Officer (Be sure to get a copy of the corporation's return) Linder penalties of perjury, I declare that( am an officer of the above corporation and that I have examined a copy of the corporation's 2012 electronic income tax return and accompanying schedules and statements and to the best of my knowledge and belief, it is true. correct, and complete. leveler declare that the amounts in Part I above are the amounts shown on the copy of the corporation's electronic income tax return. I consent to allow my electronic return originator (ERO), transmitter, or intermediate service provider to send the corporation's return to the IRS and to receive from the IRS {a) an acknowledgement of receipt or reason for rejection of the transmission, (b) the reason for any delay in processing the return or refund, and (c) the date of any refund. If applicable, I authorize the U.S. Treasury and its designated Financial Agent to initiate an electronic funds withdrawal (direct debit) entry to the financial institution account indicated in the tax preparation software for payment of the corporation's federal taxes owed on this return, and the financial institution to debit the entry to this account. To revoke a payment, l must contact the U.S. Treasury Financial Agent at 1-611a•353.4537 no later than 2 business days prior to the payment (settlement) date. I also authorize the financial institutions involved in the processing of the electronic payment of taxes to receive confidential information necessary to answer inquiries and resolve issues related to the payment. I have selected a personal identification number (PIN) as my signature for the corporation's electronic income tax return and, if applicable, the corporation's consent to electronic funds withdrawal. Officer's PIN: check one box only X I authorize John A Virgi3.i CPA MO sm1 1101911 on the corporation's 2012 electronically filed income tax return. to enter my PIN 81601 as my signature do nor "Wm WN /.liod As an officer of the corporation, l will enter my PIN as my signature on the corporation's 2012 electronically filed income tax return. 13APEAR .7. HA.PGOOD Tow ► PRESIDENT PartIII Certification and Authentication ERO's EFIN/PIN. Enter your six -digit E'FIN followed by your five digit self-selected PIN. 84666511048 do root muter MI mos l certtly than the above numeric entry is my PIN, which is my signature on the 2012 electronically filed income tax return for the corporation indicated above, 1 confirm that I am submitting this return in accordance with the requirements of Pub. 3112. IRS e -fife Application and Participation, and Pub. 4163, Modernized a -File (MeF) Information for Authorized IRS e -file Providers for Business Returns. ERCYs s,gnat,.rd ► o1e► 09/13/13 ERO Must Retain Thls Form — See Instructions Do Not Submit This Form to the IRS Unless Requested To Do So For Paperwork 'Reduction Act Notice, see Instructions. rpm 8879-5, PA • • Contractors Storage Yard Application 12015 Mineral Owners of Record: (attached) Wage Date: 3/31/2015 Travis Stewart Western Slope Materials P.O. Box 1319 Carbondale, CO 81623 Sent via email to: tjs@ws-materials.com Eric D. McCafferty Compass Mountain Land Use, LLC Post Office Box 86 Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 970.618.0837 RE: Mineral Ownership and Lessees / Crystal Ranch Corporation / Garfield County Travis, I conducted the mineral title research consistent with Garfield County and State of Colorado requirements, utilizing the County Assessor and County Recorder records. You will note, the Mineral Owner Account Numbers of 8011-030-07-000 & 8011-031-07-000. These accounts are created by, and only accessible from, the Garfield County Assessor. The research was completed on 2/25/2015. Prior to any hearings for this application, I recommend an update be conducted of the prior research. Please contact me with any questions. I will remain available to assist with this or any other application you may have. Assessor Parcel Number: 2393-234-00-131 Mineral Owner: Crystal Ranch Corporation 13 Friday Lane Chapel Hill, NC 27514 (No active mineral lease [Oil, gas or other hydrocarbons] found) Memorandum of Lease for gravel recorded at Reception Number 838315 Lessor: Crystal Ranch Corp. Lessee: Oldcastle SW Group, Inc. Mineral Owner: Assessor Mineral Account Number (Inactive): 8011-030-07-000 & 8011-031-07-000 Shirley L. Sparks 14209 Sedrev Road NE Albuquerque, NM 87123 No active, recorded mineral lease found Beneficiary Deed recorded at Reception Number 759206 Upon the death of the mineral owner noted above (Sparks), this deed conveys mineral rights to: J. William LaRue and Karen S. LaRue 608 Turner Drive NE Albuquerque, NM 87123 End of Report Assessor Parcel Number: 2393-234-00-131 Mineral Owner: Crystal Ranch Corporation 13 Friday Lane Chapel Hill, NC 27514 (No active mineral lease [Oil, gas or other hydrocarbons] found) Memorandum of Lease for gravel recorded at Reception Number 838315 Lessor: Crystal Ranch Corp. Lessee: Oldcastle SW Group, Inc. Mineral Owner: Assessor Mineral Account Number (Inactive): 8011-030-07-000 & 8011-031-07-000 Shirley L. Sparks 14209 Sedrev Road NE Albuquerque, NM 87123 No active, recorded mineral lease found Beneficiary Deed recorded at Reception Number 759206 Upon the death of the mineral owner noted above (Sparks), this deed conveys mineral rights to: J. William LaRue and Karen S. LaRue 608 Turner Drive NE Albuquerque, NM 87123 End of Report 838315 07/23/2013 11:20:33 AM Page 1 of 6 Jean Alberico, Garfield County, Colorado Rec Fee: $36.00 Doc Fee: $0.00 eRecorded After recording return to: Snell & Wilmer L.L.P. 1200 Seventeenth Street, Suite 1900 Denver, Colorado 80202 Attn: Brian Furgason, Esq. MEMORANDUM OF LEASE THIS MEMORANDUM OF LEASE (this "Memorandum") is made as of July , 2013, between Crystal Ranch Corp., a Colorado corporation ("Lessor"), and Oldcastle SW Group, Inc., a Colorado corporation ("Lessee"). RECITALS A. Lessor is party to that certain Lease Agreement between Estate of John G. Powers, Deceased ("Original Landlord") and Roaring Fork Sand & Gravel Company, Inc. dated April 19, 2001; as modified by (i) First Amendment to Lease Agreement between Original Landlord and Western Mobile, Inc. dated June 22, 2001; (ii) Second Amendment to Lease Agreement between Lessor (as successor to the Original Landlord) and Lafarge West, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Lafarge"), dated June 30, 2008; (iii) Third Amendment to Lease Agreement between Lessor and Lafarge, dated as of September 18, 2009; (iv) Fourth Amendment to Lease Agrcetnent between Lessor and Lafarge dated as of November 15, 2010 and (v) Short Terni Lease Extension between Lcssor and Lafarge dated effective as of April 28, 2013 (collectively, the "Lease"). A description of the leased property is set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. B. Lafarge has assigned and Lessee has assumed all of Lafarge's right, title and interest in, undcr and to the Lease, other than all matters set forth in the Continuing Reclamation Responsibilities Agreement of even date herewith between Lafarge and Lessor. C. Lessor and Lessee desire to execute this Memorandum to provide constructive notice of the Lease and Lessee's rights undcr the Lease to all third parties. For good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: 1. Term. Pursuant to the Lease, the term of the Lease cxpircs April 28, 2028. 2. Lease Terms. The terms of the Lease are incorporated in this Memorandum by this reference. In no event shall this Memorandum modify the terms of the Lease. 3. Successors and Assigns. This Memorandum and the Lease shall bind and inure to the benefit of the parties and their respective heirs, successors and assigns, subject, however, to any provisions of the Lease or assignment. 838315 07/23/2013 11:20:33 AM Page 2 of 6 Jean Alberico, Garfield County, Colorado Rec Fee: $36.00 Doc Fee: $0.00 eRecorded 4. Governing Law. This Memorandum is governed by the internal laws of the State of Colorado without giving effect to any choice or conflict of law provision or rule (whether of the State of Colorado or any other jurisdiction) that would cause the application of laws of any jurisdiction other than those of the State of Colorado. (Signature Pages Follow) 838315 07/23/2013 11:20:33 AM Page 3 of 6 Jean Alberico, Garfield County, Colorado Rec Fee: $36.00 Doc Fee: $0.00 eRecorded Executed as of the date first above written. LESSEE: OLDCASTLE SW GROUP, INC., a Colorado corporation By: Name: Title: STATE OF '___._�%�� COUNTY OF The foregoi g inst ment was ackn wledged before me this day t , 2013 by / as the of Oldcastle SW Group, Inc., a Colorado corporation. )ss. Witness my hand and official seal. NOTARY PUBLIC ASSIGNEE'S SIGNATURE PAGE To MEMORANDUM IIP LEASE ANI) ASSIGNMENT OF I.IiASE- POWERS 838315 07/23/2013 11:20:33 AM Page 4 of 6 Jean Alberico, Garfield County, Colorado Rec Fee: $36.00 Doc Fee: $0.00 eRecorded Executed as of the date first above written. LESSOR: CRYSTAL RANCH CORP., a Colorado corporation By. Name: arbara 1. apgood Title: President STATE OFI / attAase COUNTY OF )ss. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 0 da�� , 2013 by Barbara J. Hapgood as the President of Crystal Ranch Corp., a Colorado corporati . Witness my hand and official seal. 001 H�� JOHS 0 i ``QizR) S$V rp Z PV , •" J1'AM`G; 0 LESSOR'S SIGNATURE PAGE TO MEMORANDUM OF LEASE - POWERS 838315 07/23/2013 11:20:33 AM Page 5 of 6 Jean Alberico, Garfield County, Colorado Rec Fee: $36.00 Doc Fee: $0.00 eRecorded Mitii1X+;1 838315 07/23/2013 11:20:33 AM Page 6 of 6 Jean Alberico, Garfield County, Colorado Rec Fee: $36.00 Doc Fee: $0.00 eRecorded 8 1 1 1 1 V 8 ro 8 1- q 8 8 5 1 ri 1 2 Ei aliTalRif 190111 12tsC:Ik .731 ?rYwV1 �gg �ONilltptO,",ni j eTilii.! w lgll I^ W Si 0 sliitl:cll Y ! R 4 ! V !Itf.tstzp41.4:i 1 1. fai i'4421111 illt O N M � O � 3 sorigliiiiC E11 1111 1114.Q. 11L ra.tits t d (Z 92ed) uoTadTiosea 1091 LOfAN tnz p444;4:34�Rfir. �1$m Lzu RIZ308480 .01 alaoaoasm44444 tilNtvNVmAS 2Z'LI 48'202 ri 1 2 Ei aliTalRif 190111 12tsC:Ik .731 ?rYwV1 �gg �ONilltptO,",ni j eTilii.! w lgll I^ W Si 0 sliitl:cll Y ! R 4 ! V !Itf.tstzp41.4:i 1 1. fai i'4421111 illt O N M � O � 3 sorigliiiiC E11 1111 1114.Q. 11L ra.tits t d (Z 92ed) uoTadTiosea 1091 1111 V r EIT1011111 14'1 PEOLll1ki'ii4 ,litiAlt; ill 11111 Recept i ontt : 759206 2 1 of 2Rea 1�PM Jean Fee $10DocF s 0 OOjGARFIELO COUNTY CO BENEFICIARY DEED (§§ 15-15-401, ET SEQ., COLORADO REVISED STATUTES) CAUTION: THIS DEED MUST BE RECORDED PRIOR TO THE DEATH OF THE GRANTOR IN ORDER TO BE EFFECTIVE SHIRLEY L. SPARKS, as Grantor, whose address is 14209 Sedrev Rd. NE, Albuquerque, NM 87123, designates J. WILLIAM LaRUE, whose address is 608 Turner Drive NE, Albuquerque, NM 87123 and KAREN S. LaRUE, whose address is 608 Turner Drive NE, Albuquerque, NM 87123 as Grantees -Beneficiaries, or the survivor of them. (NOTE TO ASSESSOR AND TREASURER: Theses addresses are for identification purposes only, all notices and tax statements should continue to be sent to Grantor). Grantor transfers, sells, and conveys on her death to the Grantees -Beneficiaries, the following described real property located in the County of Garfield, State of Colorado: Alt oil, gas and other minerals in, under or produced from the lands described in that certain warranty deed dated January 22, 1959, recorded on January 31, 1959, as Document No. 204227 in Book 315 at page 10, wherein Edith James, a/k/a/ Edith S. James, Freeman S. James, a/k/a F.S. James, and a/k/a Freeman Smith James, and Shirley L. Sparks are grantors, and Richard C. Martin and Wilma S. Martin arc grantces, including but not limited to the lands described on Exhibit A attached hereto. This Beneficiary Deed is revocable. It does not transfer any ownership until the death of Grantor. It revokes all prior Beneficiary Deeds by the Grantor for this real property even if this Beneficiary Deed fails to convey all of the Grantor's interest in this real property. WARNING: Execution of this Beneficiary Deed may disqualify the Grantor from being determined eligible for, or from receiving Medicaid under Title 26. Colorado Revised Statutes. WARNING: Execution of this Beneficiary Deed may not avoid probate. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, SHIRLEY L. SPARKS has signed this instrument this /a day of September, 2008. Shirley Sparks STATE OF NEW MEXICO ) ) ss. COUNTY OF BERNALILLO ) dA The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on the/S day of September, 2008, by Shirley L. Sparks. Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires: J/ - 2.1- // L(1 Notary Public v Customer Distribution Land Title GUA RANTEE COM PANT —Since 1967— Property Address: 13114 HIGHWAY 82, CARBONDALE, CO 81623 Our Order Number: GC63009231 Date: 01-21-2015 For Title Assistance GLENWOOD SPRINGS "GW" UNIT 1317 GRAND AVE #200 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 970-945-2610 (phone) 970-945-4784 (fax) kshultz@itgc.com Other ALL VALLEY STORAGE Attention: TRAVIS STEWART PO BOX 1319 CARBONDALE, CO 81623 tjs@ws-materials.com Delivered via: Electronic Mail Land Title Guarantee Company Estimate of Title Fees Land Tale GUARANTEE COMPANY —Since 1967— Order Number: GC63009231 Date: 01-21-2015 Property Address: 13114 HIGHWAY 82, CARBONDALE, CO 81623 Buyer/Borrower: Seller: CRYSTAL RANCH CORP., A COLORADO CORPORATION Visit Land Title's website at www.ltgc.com for directions to any of our offices. Estimate of Title Insurance Fees TBD Commitment Tax Certificate RESEARCH INCOME-COMML 200' search $199.00 $21.00 $150.00 If Land Title Guarantee Company will be closing this transaction, the fees listed above will be collected at closing. Total $370.00 THANK YOU FOR YOUR ORDER! ALTA COMMITMENT Old Republic National Title Insurance Company Schedule A Property Address: 13114 HIGHWAY 82, CARBONDALE, CO 81623 1. Effective Date: 12-19-2015 at 05:OOPM 2. Policy to be Issued and Proposed Insured: "TBD" Commitment $0.00 Order Number: GC63009231 Customer Ref -Loan No.: 3. The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment and covered herein is: A FEE SIMPLE 4. Title to the estate or interest covered herein is at the effective date hereof vested in: CRYSTAL RANCH CORP., A COLORADO CORPORATION 5. The Land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows: A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN THE E1/2SE1/4 OF SECTION 23, LOTS 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7,8, 10, 11, 12, 13 OF SECTION 26, LOTS 1, 6, 7, 8, 9 OF SECTON 27, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 88 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF GARFIELD, STATE OF COLORADO; SAID PARCEL BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 23, A GARFIELD COUNTY SURVEYOR BRASS CAP IN PLACE, THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE S 04 DEGREES 11' 39" W ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SECTION 26 A DISTANCE OF 1363.18 FEET TO THE NORTH SIXTEENTH CORNER OF SECTION 26 AND SECTION 25, A BLM CAP IN PLACE; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE S 04 DEGREES 11' 15" W 882.42 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID EASTERLY LINE S 89 DEGREES 58' 54" W ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF GOVERNMENT LOT 8 A DISTANCE OF 441.01 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THAT PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN RECEPTION NO. 241101 OF THE GARFIELD COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER'S OFFICE, A REBAR AND CAP L.S. #19598 IN PLACE; THENCE S 02 DEGREES 54' 54" W ALONG THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID PARCEL 134.10 FEET TO A REBAR AND CAP L.S. #27613 IN PLACE; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE S 32 DEGREES 28' 54" W 435.00 FEET TO A REBAR AND CAP L.S. # 27613 IN PLACE; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE S 58 DEGREES 20' 54" W 471.00 FEET TO A REBAR AND CAP L.S. #19598 IN PLACE; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE S 46 DEGREES 47' 54" W 964.00 FEET TO A REBAR AND CAP L.S. #19598 IN PLACE; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE S 38 DEGREES 58' 54" W 245.00 FEET TO A REBAR AND CAP L.S. #19598 IN PLACE; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE S 20 DEGREES 31' 54" W 586. 43 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF STATE HIGHWAY NO. 82, A REBAR AND CAP L.S. #19598 IN PLACE; THENCE N 75 DEGREES 41' 08" W ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY 86.22 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY N 17 DEGREES 10' 22" E 115.01 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY N 72 DEGREES 49' 38" W 100.00 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY S 17 DEGREES 10' 22" W 120.00 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY N 75 DEGREES 41' 08" W ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY 200.32 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY N 72 DEGREES 49' 38" W 1100.00 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY N 69 DEGREES 00' 38" W 37.47 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY LINE OF GOVERNMENT LOT 13, A REBAR AND CAP L.S. #27613 IN PLACE; THENCE LEAVING SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY N 00 DEGREES 03' 08" W ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF GOVERNMENT LOT 13 A DISTANCE OF 282.77 FEET TO A REBAR AND CAP ALTA COMMITMENT Old Republic National Title Insurance Company Schedule A Order Number: GC63009231 Customer Ref -Loan No.: L.S. #27613 IN PLACE; THENCE LEAVING SAID EASTERLY LINE S 84 DEGREES 41' 00" W 251.75 FEET TO A REBAR AND CAP L.S. #27613 IN PLACE; THENCE N 68 DEGREES 30' 55" W 452.94 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 13, A REBAR AND CAP L.S. #27613 IN PLACE; THENCE N 89 DEGREES 50' 38" W ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE 787.55 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF SAID STATE HIGHWAY NO. 82, A REBAR AND CAP L.S. #27613 IN PLACE; THENCE N 72 DEGREES 50' 07" W ALONG SAID NORHTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY 260.97 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY N 73 DEGREES 16' 36" W 437.06 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 1950.00 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 17 DEGREES 33' 00" A DISTANCE OF 597.30 FEET (CHORD BEARS N 82 DEGREES 04' 37" W 594.96 FEET); THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY S 89 DEGREES 08' 53" W 32.40 FEET TO A CDOT RIGHT-OF-WAY MONUMENT IN PLACE; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY N 77 DEGREES 38' 38" W 141. 70 FEET TO A CDOT RIGHT-OF-WAY MONUMENT IN PLACE, THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY S 89 DEGREES 09' 30" W 340.31 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF DIXON SUBDIVISION AS AMENDED; THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY N 00 DEGREES 00' 21" W ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION AND SAID EASTERLY LINE EXTENDED 1009.99 FEET TO POINT ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF GOVERNMENT LOT 6 OF SAID SECTION 27; THENCE N 88 DEGREES 32' 33" E ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 6 A DISTANCE OF 55.01 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 1; THENCE N 00 DEGREES 35' 37" E ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 1 A DISTANCE OF 914.30 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST SIXTEENTH CORNER OF SAID SECTION 27, A BLM CAP IN PLACE; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 1 S 88 DEGREES 41' 05" E 1296.82 FEET TO THE NORTH SIXTEENTH CORNER OF SAID SECTION 27 AND SECTION 26, A BLM CAP IN PLACE; THENCE S 89 DEGREES 59' 06" E ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF GOVERNMENT LOT 4 AND LOT 3 OF SAID SECTION 26 A DISTANCE OF 2923.75 FEET TO THE NORTH -CENTER SIXTEENTH CORNER OF SAID SECTION 26, A BLM CAP IN PLACE; THENCE S 89 DEGREES 09' 48" E ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF GOVERNMENT LOT 2 A DISTANCE OF 1306.83 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST SIXTEENTH CORNER OF SAID SECTION 26, A 3 1/4" ALUMINUM CAP L.S. #19598 SET IN PLACE; THENCE N 04 DEGREES 07' 35" E ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE NE1/4NE1/4 OF SAID SECTION 26 A DISTANCE OF 1379.95 FEET TO THE EAST SIXTEENTH CORNER OF SAID SECTION 26 AND SECTION 23, A BLM GAP INPLACE; THENCE N 01 DEGREES 15' 55" W ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE E1/2SE1/4 OF SAID SECTION 23 A DISTANCE OF 2603.33 FEET TO THE EAST -CENTER SIXTEENTH CORNER OF SAID SECTION 23, A BLM CAP IN PLACE; THENCE N 89 DEGREES 52' 54" E ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID E1/2SE1/4 A DISTANCE OF 1237.65 FEET TO THE EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 23, A COUNTY SURVEYOR BRASS CAP IN PLACE; THENCE S 02 DEGREES 43' 05" E ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 23 A DISTANCE OF 1321.92 FEET TO THE SOUTH SIXTEENTH CORNER OF SAID SECTION 23 AND SECTION 24, A BLM CAP IN PLACE; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 23 S 02 DEGREES 47' 35"E 1322.21 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. TOGETHER WITH THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED JUNE 5, 2001 IN BOOK 1258 AT PAGE 902 AND INSTRUMENT RECORDED AUGUST 4, 2003 IN BOOK 1501 AT PAGE 322 EXCEPTING FROM THE ABOVE: THE PARCEL OF LAND RECORDED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED APRIL 16, 2001 IN BOOK 1245 AT PAGE 659 AND PARCEL OF LAND RECORDED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED NOVEMBER 2, 2007 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 736678. AND EXCEPTING FROM THE ABOVE: THE PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED JUNE 13, 2012 AT RECEPTION NO. 819979 AND RECORDED FEBRUARY 4, 2013 AT RECEPTION NO. 830840 ALTA COMMITMENT Old Republic National Title Insurance Company Schedule A Order Number: GC63009231 Customer Ref -Loan No.: AND EXCEPTING FROM THE ABOVE: THE PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED MARCH 19, 2012 AT RECEPTION NO. 816136 AND RECORDED FEBRUARY 4, 2013 AT RECEPTION NO. 830840 AND EXCEPTING FROM THE ABOVE: A ROADWAY WITHIN LOTS 10 AND 11 OF SECTION 26, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 88 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF GARFIELD, STATE OF COLORADO, ALSO WITHIN THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THE DOCUMENT RECORDED NOVEMBER 2, 2006 AS RECEPTION NO. 710307 OF THE GARFIELD COUNTY RECORDS WITH ALL BEARINGS CONTAINED HEREIN BEING RELATIVE TO A BEARING OF S 89°59'06" E BETWEEN THE N1/16 CORNER OF SAID SECTIONS 26 AND 27 AND THE N -C1/16 OF SAID SECTION 26; SAID PARCEL BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING ATA POINT ON THE COMMON BOUNDARY OF SAID DOCUMENT AND THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THE WARRANTY DEED RECORDED DECEMBER 30, 1983 AS RECEPTION NO. 348555 OF SAID COUNTY RECORDS FROM WHENCE SAID N1/16 CORNER BEARS N. 52°19'38"W., A DISTANCE OF 4,386.66 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID COMMON BOUNDARY THE FOLLOWING SIX (6) COURSES: 1) S 43°03'09" W, 72.85 FEET; 2) 94.97 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, RADIUS OF 200.00 FEET AND CENTRAL ANGLE OF 27°12'29" (CHORD S 56°39'24" W, 94.08 FEET); 3) S 70°15'39" W, 176.85 FEET; 4) 147.95 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT, RADIUS OF 160.00 FEET AND CENTRAL ANGLE OF 52°58'45" (CHORD BEARS S 43°46'16" W, 142.73 FEET); 5) S 17°16'54" W, 4.99 FEET; 6) S 59°19'11" W, 67.47 FEET TO A POINT ON THE COMMON BOUNDARY OF SAID PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THE DOCUMENT RECORDED NOVEMBER 2, 2006 AS RECEPTION NO. 710307 AND THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF STATE HIGHWAY NO. 82; THENCE ALONG SAID COMMON BOUNDARY THE FOLLOWING THREE (3) COURSES: 1) S 75°40'49" E, 131.97 FEET; 2) N 17°10'41" E, 120.00 FEET; 3) S 72°49'19" E, 35.93 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID COMMON BOUNDARY N 70°15'39" E, A DISTANCE OF 160.27 FEET; THENCE 50.95 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 200.00 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 14°35'43" (CHORD N 62°57'47" E, 50.81 FEET TO A POINT ON SAID COMMON BOUNDARY OF SAID PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THE DOCUMENT RECORDED NOVEMBER 2, 2006 AS RECEPTION NO. 710307 AND THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THE WARRANTY DEED RECORDED DECEMBER 30, 1983 AS RECEPTION NO. 348555; THENCE ALONG SAID COMMON BOUNDARY N 20°32'00" E, A DISTANCE OF 169.06 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING AS DECLARATION IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED APRIL 22, 2014 AT RECEPTION NO. 848450. COUNTY OF GARFIELD STATE OF COLORADO Copyright 2006-2015 American Land Title Association. All Rights Reserved The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. AMI RICAN LAND 1111.! ASSOCIATION ALTA COMMITMENT Old Republic National Title Insurance Company Schedule B-1 (Requirements) Order Number: GC63009231 The following are the requirements to be complied with: Payment to or for the account of the grantors or mortgagors of the full consideration for the estate or interest to be insured. Proper instrument(s) creating the estate or interest to be insured must be executed and duly filed for record, to -wit: THIS COMMITMENT IS FOR INFORMATION ONLY, AND NO POLICY WILL BE ISSUED PURSUANT HERETO. NOTE: THE COMMITMENT DOES NOT REFLECT THE STATUS OF TITLE TO WATER RIGHTS OR REPRESENTATION OF SAID RIGHTS. NOTE: THIS COMMITMENT IS NOTA REPORT OR REPRESENTATION AS TO MINERAL INTERESTS, AND SHOULD NOT BE USED, OR RELIED UPON, IN CONNECTION WITH THE NOTICE REQUIREMENTS THAT ARE SET FORTH IN CRS 24-65.5-103. Old Republic National Title Insurance Company Schedule B-2 (Exceptions) Order Number: GC63009231 The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company: 1. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records but that could be ascertained by an inspection of the Land or that may be asserted by persons in possession of the Land. 2. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records. 3. Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land and not shown by the Public Records. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the Public Records. 5. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date of the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. 6. (a) Taxes or assessments that are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the Public Records; (b) proceedings by a public agency that may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the Public Records. 7. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water. 8. EXISTING LEASES AND TENANCIES. 9. RIGHT OF PROPRIETOR OFA VEIN OR LODE TO EXTRACT AND REMOVE HIS ORE THEREFROM SHOULD THE SAME BE FOUND TO PENETRATE OR INTERSECT THE PREMISES AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED MARCH 14, 1894, IN BOOK 12 AT PAGE 307. 10. RIGHT OF THE PROPRIETOR OFA VEIN OR LODE TO EXTRACT AND REMOVE HIS ORE THEREFROM, SHOULD THE SAME BE FOUND TO PENETRATE OR INTERSECT THE PREMISES HEREBY GRANTED, AND A RIGHT OF WAY FOR DITCHES OR CANALS CONSTRUCTED BY THE AUTHORITY OF THE UNITED STATES, AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 8, 1899 IN BOOK 12 AT PAGE 526. 11. RIGHT OF THE PROPRIETOR OFA VEIN OR LODE TO EXTRACT AND REMOVE HIS ORE THEREFROM, SHOULD THE SAME BE FOUND TO PENETRATE OR INTERSECT THE PREMISES HEREBY GRANTED, AND A RIGHT OF WAY FOR DITCHES OR CANALS CONSTRUCTED BY THE AUTHORITY OF THE UNITED STATES, AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED FEBRUARY 19, 1923 IN BOOK 73 AT PAGE 130. 12. RIGHT OF PROPRIETOR OFA VEIN OR LODE TO EXTRACT AND REMOVE HIS ORE THEREFROM SHOULD THE SAME BE FOUND TO PENETRATE OR INTERSECT THE PREMISES AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED MAY 09, 1898, IN BOOK 12 AT PAGE 485. 13. RIGHT OF PROPRIETOR OFA VEIN OR LODE TO EXTRACT AND REMOVE HIS ORE THEREFROM SHOULD THE SAME BE FOUND TO PENETRATE OR INTERSECT THE PREMISES AS RESERVED IN Old Republic National Title Insurance Company Schedule B-2 (Exceptions) Order Number: GC63009231 The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company: UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED MAY 27, 1895, IN BOOK 12 AT PAGE 366. 14. RESERVATONS AS CONTAINED IN DEED FROM EDITH JAMES, ALSO KNOWN AS EDITH S. JAMES, FREEMAN S. JAMES, ALSO KNOWN AS F.S. JAMES AS FREEMAN SMITH JAMES AND SHIRLEY L. SPARKS (FORMERLY SHIRLEY L. JAMES) TO RICHARD C. MARTIN AND WILMA S. MARTIN, RECORDED JANUARY 31, 1959, IN BOOK 315 AT PAGE 10, PROVIDING AS FOLLOWS: AND PROVIDED FURTHER THAT THE GRANTORS HEREIN, FOR THEMSELVES, THEIR HEIRS, EXECUTORS, ADMINISTRATORS AND ASSIGNS RESERVE, AND EXCEPT FROM THIS CONVEYANCE, AN UNDIVIDED 1/2 INTEREST IN AND TO ALL OIL, GAS AND OTHER MINERALS IN OR UNDER SAID LAND, OR WHICH MAY BE RECOVERED THEREFROM, AND ALSO THE RIGHT OF INGRESS AND EGRESS TO GO UPON SAID LANDS AND DRILL, PROSPECT FOR, AND PRODUCE, ANY SUCH OIL, GAS OR OTHER MINERALS, SUBJECT TO THE CONDITION THAT THE OWNERS OF SUCH RESERVED MINERAL ESTATE WILL BE REQUIRED TO PAY THE SURFACE OWNER ALL DAMAGES OCCASIONED BY ANY DRILLING, PROSPECTING, OR OTHER PRODUCTION OPERATIONS. 15. AS TO A PORTION OF THE E1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST1/4 OF SECTION 23 AND OF THE NE1/4NE1/5 AND LOTS 1 TO 12 OF SECTION 26, SAND AND GRAVEL LEASE BETWEEN RICHARD C. MARTIN AND WILMA S. MARTIN, AS LESSORS AND ANDY ZEMLOCK, JR. AND MARTIN SCOTT ZEMLOCK, AS LESSEES, FOR A TERM OF YEARS, DATED FEBRUARY 27, 1963 RECORDED FEBRUARY 27, 1963 AT RECEPTION NO. 220571. 16. RIGHT OF WAY FOR THE NICHOLS DITCH AS SHOWN BY MAP AND STATEMENT FILED FOR RECORD JUNE 1, 1895 AS DOCUMENT NO. 18448. 17. RIGHTS OF WAY FOR THE NICHOLS DITCH, THE FIRST ENLARGEMENT OF THE KELSO DITCH AND THE SECOND ENLARGEMENT OF THE KELSO DITCH, AS EVIDENCED BY DECREE RECORDED FEBRUARY 3, 1941 IN BOOK 201 AT PAGE 68, CERTIFICATE OF WATER RIGHTS RECORDED MAY 24, 1958 IN BOOK 309 AT PAGE 30 AND CERTIFICATE OF WATER RIGHTS RECORDED MAY 24, 1958 IN BOOK 309 AT PAGE 31. 18. RIGHT OF WAY AND EASEMENT AGREEMENT FOR ROAD PURPOSES AS GRANTED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED JUNE 10, 1968 IN BOOK 395 AT PAGE 23. 19. RIGHT OF WAY FOR ROAD PURPOSES AS GRANTED IN WARRANTY DEED FROM JOHN G. POWERS TO RICHARD C. MARTIN AND WILMA S. MARTIN RECORDED JULY 13, 1973 IN BOOK 447 AT PAGE 178 AND AS CONVEYED IN DEED RECORDED APRIL 16, 2001 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 579332. 20. RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT TO THE MOUNTAIN STATES TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY AS GRANTED BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 18, 1975 IN BOOK 454 AT PAGE 198. 21. EASEMENT TO U.S. WEST COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AS GRANTED BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED JULY 12, 1991 IN BOOK 808 AT PAGE 419. 22. RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT TO U.S. WEST COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AS GRANTED BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED JULY 21, 1991 IN BOOK 808 AT PAGE 422. 23. RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT TO HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION, INC. FOR AN ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION LINE AS GRANTED BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED MARCH 31, 1972 IN BOOK 428 AT PAGE 541. Old Republic National Title Insurance Company Schedule B-2 (Exceptions) Order Number: GC63009231 The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company: 24. RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT TO HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION, INC. AS GRANTED BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED MAY 25, 1973 IN BOOK 445 AT PAGE 79. 25. RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT TO HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION, INC. AS GRANTED BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED 6, 1980 IN BOOK 544 AT PAGE 860 AND RECORDED MARCH 19, 1991 IN BOOK 800 AT PAGE 565 AND RECORDED AUGUST 28, 1995 IN BOOK 951 AT PAGE 287. 26. RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENTS TO HOLY CROSS ENERGY AS GRANTED BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED MAY 30, 2000 IN BOOK 1189 AT PAGE 639, IN BOOK 1189 AT PAGE 641 AND IN BOOK 1189 AT PAGE 643. 27. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF EASEMENT, DEEDS AND AGREEMENT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 04, 1992 IN BOOK 840 AT PAGE 970. 28. TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS, BURDENS AND OBLIGATIONS AS SET FORTH IN FINDINGS AND DECREE RECORDED MARCH 17, 1994 IN BOOK 896 AT PAGE 1. 29. TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS, BURDENS AND OBLIGATIONS AS SET FORTH IN RULE AND ORDER RECORDED JANUARY 31, 1975 IN BOOK 468 AT PAGE 518. 30. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF AGREEMENT RECORDED APRIL 05, 2001 IN BOOK 1243 AT PAGE 151 AND AMENDMENT RECORDED OCTOBER 11, 2011 AT RECEPTION NO. 809168. 31. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF AGREEMENT RECORDED JUNE 05, 2001 IN BOOK 1258 AT PAGE 909. 32. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF ORDER RECORDED AUGUST 04, 2003 IN BOOK 1501 AT PAGE 322. 33. TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS, BURDENS AND OBLIGATIONS AS SET FORTH IN HOLY CROSS ENERGY RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT RECORDED AUGUST 28, 2008 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 754761. 34. TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS, BURDENS AND OBLIGATIONS AS SET FORTH IN TRENCH, CONDUIT, AND VAULT AGREEMENT RECORDED JUNE 01, 2010 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 786667. 35. EASEMENT GRANTED TO HOLY CROSS ENERGY, A COLORADO CORPORATION, FOR UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION LINE, AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED JUNE 01, 2010, UNDER RECEPTION NO. 786668. 36. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF RESOLUTION NO. 2011-77 RECORDED DECEMBER 14, 2011 AT RECEPTION NO. 811974. 37. TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS, BURDENS, OBLIGATIONS AND EASEMENTS AS SET FORTH AND GRANTED IN VIEW PLANE NEGATIVE EASEMENT AND COVENANTS RECORDED MARCH 19, 2012 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 816134. 38. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF EASEMENT AGREEMENT RECORDED OCTOBER 11, 2011 AT RECEPTION NO. 809167. 39. TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS, BURDENS, OBLIGATIONS AND EASEMENTS AS SET FORTH Old Republic National Title Insurance Company Schedule B-2 (Exceptions) Order Number: GC63009231 The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company: AND GRANTED IN ROAD CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT RECORDED MAY 13, 2013 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 834949. 40. TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS, BURDENS, OBLIGATIONS AND EASEMENTS AS SET FORTH AND GRANTED IN LAND USE CHANGE PERMIT RECORDED MAY 14, 2013 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 835254. 41. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF HOLY CROSS RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT RECORDED JULY 12, 2013 AT RECEPTION NO. 837919 AND RE RECORDED JULY 25, 2013 AT RECEPTION NO. 838444. 42. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF RESOLUTION NO. 14-19 RECORDED APRIL 22, 2014 AT RECEPTION NO. 848456. 43. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF UTILITY EASEMENT RECORDED APRIL 22, 2014 AT RECEPTION NO. 848457. 44. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF RESOLUTION NO. PC -2014-02 RECORDED APRIL 09, 2014 AT RECEPTION NO. 848030. 45. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF RESOLUTION NO. 2014-20 RECORDED APRIL 22, 2014 AT RECEPTION NO. 848461. GUARANTEE COMPANY WWW. LTGC.COM JOINT NOTICE OF PRIVACY POLICY OF LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY, LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY - GRAND JUNCTION, LAND TITLE INSURANCE CORPORATION AND OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY This Statement is provided to you as a customer of Land Title Guarantee Company and Meridian Land Title, LLC, as agents for Land Title Insurance Corporation and Old Republic National Title Insurance Company. We want you to know that we recognize and respect your privacy expectations and the requirements of federal and state privacy laws. Information security is one of our highest priorities. We recognize that maintaining your trust and confidence is the bedrock of our business. We maintain and regularly review internal and external safeguards against unauthorized access to non-public personal information ("Personal Information"). In the course of our business, we may collect Personal Information about you from: o applications or other forms we receive from you, including communications sent through TMX, our web -based transaction management system; ▪ your transactions with, or from the services being performed by, us, our affiliates, or others; N. a consumer reporting agency, if such information is provided to us in connection with your transaction; and the public records maintained by governmental entities that we either obtain directly from those entities, or from our affiliates and non -affiliates. Our policies regarding the protection of the confidentiality and security of your Personal Information are as follows: o We restrict access to all Personal Information about you to those employees who need to know that information in order to provide products and services to you. ▪ We maintain physical, electronic and procedural safeguards that comply with federal standards to protect your Personal Information from unauthorized access or intrusion. o Employees who violate our strict policies and procedures regarding privacy are subject to disciplinary action. o We regularly access security standards and procedures to protect against unauthorized access to Personal Information. WE DO NOT DISCLOSE ANY PERSONAL INFORMATION ABOUT YOU WITH ANYONE FOR ANY PURPOSE THAT IS NOT PERMITTED BY LAW. Consistent with applicable privacy laws, there are some situations in which Personal Information may be disclosed. We may disclose your Personal Information when you direct or give us permission; when we are required by law to do so, for example, if we are served a subpoena; or when we suspect fraudulent or criminal activities. We also may disclose your Personal Information when otherwise permitted by applicable privacy laws such as, for example, when disclosure is needed to enforce our rights arising out of any agreement, transaction or relationship with you. Our policy regarding dispute resolution is as follows. Any controversy or claim arising out of or relating to our privacy policy, or the breach thereof, shall be settled by arbitration in accordance with the rules of the American Arbitration Association, and judgment upon the award rendered by the arbitrator(s) may be entered in any court having jurisdiction thereof. Land Title G11A RA NTEE COMPANY —Since 1967 LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY - GRAND JUNCTION DISCLOSURE STATEMENTS Note: Pursuant to CRS 10-11-122, notice is hereby given that: A) The Subject real property may be located in a special taxing district. B) A certificate of taxes due listing each taxing jurisdiction will be obtained from the county treasurer of the county in which the real property is located or that county treasurers authorized agent unless the proposed insured provides written instructions to the contrary. (for an Owner's Policy of Title Insurance pertaining to a sale of residential real property) C) The information regarding special districts and the boundaries of such districts may be obtained from the Board of County Commissioners, the County Clerk and Recorder, or the County Assessor. Note: Effective September 1, 1997, CRS 30-10-406 requires that all documents received for recording or filing in the clerk and recorder's office shall contain a top margin of at least one inch and a left, right and bottom margin of at least one half of an inch. The clerk and recorder may refuse to record or file any document that does not conform, except that, the requirement for the top margin shall not apply to documents using forms on which space is provided for recording or filing information at the top margin of the document. Note: Colorado Division of Insurance Regulations 3-5-1, Paragraph C of Article VII requires that "Every title entity shall be responsible for all matters which appear of record prior to the time of recording whenever the title entity conducts the closing and is responsible for recording or filing of legal documents resulting from the transaction which was closed". Provided that Land Title Guarantee Company conducts the closing of the insured transaction and is responsible for recording the legal documents from the transaction, exception number 5 will not appear on the Owner's Title Policy and the Lenders Policy when issued. Note: Affirmative mechanic's lien protection for the Owner may be available (typically by deletion of Exception no. 4 of Schedule B, Section 2 of the Commitment from the Owner's Policy to be issued) upon compliance with the following conditions: A) The land described in Schedule A of this commitment must be a single family residence which includes a condominium or townhouse unit. B) No labor or materials have been furnished by mechanics or material -men for purposes of construction on the land described in Schedule A of this Commitment within the past 6 months. C) The Company must receive an appropriate affidavit indemnifying the Company against un -filed mechanic's and material -men's liens. D) The Company must receive payment of the appropriate premium. E) If there has been construction, improvements or major repairs undertaken on the property to be purchased within six months prior to the Date of the Commitment, the requirements to obtain coverage for unrecorded liens will include: disclosure of certain construction information; financial information as to the seller, the builder and or the contractor; payment of the appropriate premium fully executed Indemnity Agreements satisfactory to the company, and, any additional requirements as may be necessary after an examination of the aforesaid information by the Company. No coverage will be given under any circumstances for labor or material for which the insured has contracted for or agreed to pay. Note: Pursuant to CRS 10-11-123, notice is hereby given: This notice applies to owner's policy commitments containing a mineral severance instrument exception, or exceptions, in Schedule B, Section 2. A) That there is recorded evidence that a mineral estate has been severed, leased, or otherwise conveyed from the surface estate and that there is a substantial likelihood that a third party holds some or all interest in oil, gas, other minerals, or geothermal energy in the property; and B) That such mineral estate may include the right to enter and use the property without the surface owner's permission. Note: Pursuant to CRS 10-1-128(6)(a), It is unlawful to knowingly provide false, incomplete, or misleading facts or information to an insurance company for the purpose of defrauding or attempting to defraud the company. Penalties may include imprisonment, fines, denial of insurance, and civil damages. Any insurance company or agent of an insurance company who knowingly provides false, incomplete, or misleading facts or information to a policyholder or claimant for the purpose of defrauding or attempting to defraud the policyholder or claimant with regard to a settlement or award payable from insurance proceeds shall be reported to the Colorado division of insurance within the department of regulatory agencies. Nothing herein contained will be deemed to obligate the company to provide any of the coverages referred to herein unless the above conditions are fully satisfied. *,,,11!1 OaALTIrtelat'. *,� * *s • °,fid k . * *Sr) •, 070. AN" •.` ',1,11111 Commitment to Insure ALTA Commitment - 2006 Rev. OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Minnesota corporation, (Company) for a valuable consideration, commits to issue its policy or policies of title insurance, as identified in Schedule A, in favor of the Proposed Insured named in Schedule A, as owner or mortgagee of the estate or interest in the land described or referred to in Schedule A, upon payment of the premiums and charges and compliance with the requirements; all subject to the provisions of Schedule A and B and to the Conditions of this Commitment. This Commitment shall be effective only when the identity of the Proposed Insured and the amount of the policy or policies committed for have been inserted in Schedule A by the Company. All liability and obligation under this commitment shall cease and terminate six months after the Effective Date or when the policy or policies committed for shall issue, whichever first occurs, provided that the failure to issue such policy or policies is not the fault of the Company. CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS 1. The term "mortgage", when used herein, shall include deed of trust, trust deed, or other security instrument. 2. If the proposed Insured has or acquires actual knowledge of any defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter affecting the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment other than those shown in Schedule B hereof, and shall fail to disclose such knowledge to Company in writing, the Company shall be relieved from liability for any loss or damage resulting from any act of reliance hereon to the extent the Company is prejudiced by failure to so disclose such knowledge. If the proposed Insured shall disclose such knowledge to the Company, or if the Company otherwise acquires actual knowledge of any such defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter, the Company at its option may amend Schedule B of this Commitment accordingly, but such amendment shall not relieve the Company from liability previously incurred pursuant to paragraph 3 of these Conditions and Stipulations. 3. Liability of the Company under this Commitment shall be only to the named proposed Insured and such parties included under the definition of Insured in the form of policy or policies committed for and only for actual loss incurred in reliance hereon in undertaking in good faith (a) to comply with the requirements hereof or (b) to eliminate exceptions shown in Schedule B, or (c) to acquire or create the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. In no event shall such liability exceed the amount stated in Schedule A for the policy or policies committed for and such liability is subject to the insuring provisions and the Conditions and Stipulations and the Exclusions from Coverage of the form of policy or policies committed for in favor of the proposed Insured which are hereby incorporated by reference and are made a part of this Commitment except as expressly modified herein. 4. This commitment is a contract to issue one or more title insurance policies and is not an abstract of title or a report of the condition of title. Any action or actions or rights of action that the proposed Insured may have or may bring against the Company arising out of the status of the title to the estate or interest or the status of the mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment must be based on and are subject to the provisions of this Commitment. 5. The policy to be issued contains an arbitration clause. All arbitrable matters when the Amount of Insurance is $2,000,000 or less shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Insured as the exclusive remedy of the parties. You may review a copy of the arbitration rules at www.alta.org. STANDARD EXCEPTIONS In addition to the matters contained in the Conditions and Stipulations and Exclusions from Coverage above referred to, this Commitment is also subject to the following: 1. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the Public Records. 2. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the Public Records. 3. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, and any facts which a correct survey or inspection of the Land would disclose and which are not shown by the Public Records. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material theretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the Public Records. 5. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the Public Records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Old Republic National Title Insurance Company has caused its corporate name and seal to be affixed by its duly authorized officers on the date shown in Schedule A to be valid when countersigned by a validating officer or other authorized signatory. Issued by: Land Title Guarantee Company 3033 East First Avenue Suite 600 Denver, Colorado 80206 303-321-1880 John E. Freyer President Authorized Officer or Agent Old Republic National Title Insurance Company a Stock Company 400 Second Avenue South Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612)371-1111 Mark Bilbrey President Rance Yeager secretary AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION Contractors Storage Yard Application 12015 Adjacent Property Owners (200ft.) : (attached) 7IPage Travis J. Stewart From: Kim Shultz [kshultz©Itgc.com] Sent: Monday, March 30, 2015 11:31 AM To: Travis J. Stewart Subject: Fwd: Application Documents Attachments: 2393-234-00-131.pdf; AdjacentTo239223400131.xlsx Travis: Sorry it has taken me a while to get back to you on the email you sent over the other day on the 200 foot list. I requested that the same department that originally did the list from Land Title update this for you and was met with resistance from them. So after a few days of thinking about this they informed me that Land Title has decided not to offer this product anymore, so they could not update this list. As you can see after that I contacted the GIS Department for Garfield County and they took care of it for you. There is no charge for this service, so in the future you should be able to contact Rob directly. Attached is the list he sent and it should obviously be better for the County Department that wrote you as it was all handled internally. Let me know if you need anything else. Sincerely, Kim Shultz Title Officer Land Title Guarantee 200 Basalt Center Circle Basalt, Co 81621 (970) 927-0405 Please visit our website for directions, rates, placing orders and much more! Forwarded message From: Rob Hykys <rhykys@garfield-county.com> Date: Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 11:07 AM Subject: RE: Application Documents To: Kim Shultz <kshultz@ltgc.com> Hi Kim, It looks like parcel 2393-234-00-131 has been split. That must have been the issue with the original map you sent me. Attached is a map showing 2393-234-00-131 as it exists now, along with the 200' buffer around it. 1 I have also attached an Excel spreadsheet containing the adjacent properties within 200' of 2393-234-00-131. BTW, all of the tools necessary to generate a buffer and a list of parcels like this are available on this page on our website. Rob e._ Garfr frf Count; Robert P. Hykys GIS Analyst Garfield County Govt. 109 8th St Room 207 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 970-945-1377 x1590 rhykys@garfield-county.com From: Kim Shultz [mailto:kshultz@Itgc.com] Sent: Monday, March 30, 2015 8:56 AM To: Rob Hykys Subject: Fwd: Application Documents Rob: Another request from a customer that I am hoping you can help me out with? This has to do with attachment #2 and the 200 foot list. Land Title actually updated this list and then got another email from Travis which came from Garfield County which stated that they needed to verify the accuracy of what we had submitted as if maybe there were errors. This was done in another department and after a long discussion by the powers that be, they have decided that Land Title is not going to offer this product anymore. Now that I know that Garfield 2 County can provide these types of products to customers, I would like to refer him to you to get a complete and updated list. I will also forward you the latest email from Travis that includes the comment from Garfield County. Can you please verify that you can take care of this for him and I will contact Travis and let him know what is going on. Thanks again for all of your help. Sincerely, Kim Shultz Title Officer Land Title Guarantee 200 Basalt Center Circle Basalt, Co 81621 (970) 927-0405 Please visit our website for directions, rates, placing orders and much more! Forwarded message From: Travis J. Stewart <tjs@ws-materials.com> Date: Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 2:14 PM Subject: Application Documents To: "kshultz@ltgc.com" <kshultz@1tgc.com> Hi Kim, I hope this finds you doing well! I was wondering if you could provide me with an updated version of the attached sheets. This is for a project I'm helping Crystal River Corp. with. Thanks! Travis Travis Stewart President of Operations 3 Updated Own ers List PARCELNB ACCOUNTNO NAME 239316300954 R043957 BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT 239323100125 R011405 HAYES, RICHARD D & DENISE 239323100282 R111628 CONNOR, LORAINE BRIE & RICHARD DOUGLAS 239323100284 R111630 CRAMER, TODD 239323100287 R111766 DAMERAU, DIANE D 239323400130 R011421 VON TEES, LISA GAIL THOMPSON FAMILY TRUST- MICHAEL J & SUSAN G THOMPSON 239323400361 R111965 TRUSTEES 239323400386 R112083 DAVIS, JOHN F & JOHN D BOKF NA DBA BK OF OKLAHOMA SCCR IN INT TO BK OF OKLAHOMA & BOKF DBA COLORADO BK & TRUST SCCR IN INT TO COLORADO ST 239324206026 R044199 BK TRUST 239324300385 R112082 DAVIS, JOHN & PAMELA S 239324304001 R111838 CLEMONS, GEORGE 1 & MARTHA H 239324304002 R111839 MCMAHON, ARTHUR FAMILY TRUST 239324304009 R111846 HARDMAN, BRAD & JULIE 239324304010 R111847 HAYS, THOMAS D & MARILYN A BOKF NA DBA BK OF OKLAHOMA SCCR IN INT TO BK OF OKLAHOMA & BOKF DBA COLORADO BK & TRUST SCCR IN INT TO COLORADO ST 239324306027 R044200 BK TRUST BOKF NA DBA BK OF OKLAHOMA SCCR IN INT TO BK OF OKLAHOMA & BOKF DBA COLORADO BK & TRUST SCCR IN INT TO COLORADO ST 239324306028 R044201 BK TRUST BOKF NA DBA BK OF OKLAHOMA SCCR IN INT TO BK OF OKLAHOMA & BOKF DBA COLORADO BK & TRUST SCCR IN INT TO COLORADO ST 239324306037 R044210 BK TRUST 239325204011 R111848 GADDIS, BRIAN E & SANDRA GROSSMANN 239325204012 R111849 COYLE, CHRISTOPHER L & JONNA SUE T 239325204013 R111850 SAKIN, SALLY B 239325204022 R111859 FITCH, JONATHAN & LUCIE 239325300158 R111310 CERISE, CLIFFORD RANCH COMPANY 239326300002 R111318 BAILEY FAMILY INVESTMENT COMPANY 239326300003 R011362 BAILEY FAMILY INVESTMENT COMPANY 239326300005 R111927 BAILEY FAMILY INVESTMENT COMPANY 239326300006 R044384 RYOBI FOUNDATION 239326400004 R111308 BAILEY FAMILY INVESTMENT COMPANY CAREOE ADDRESS2 C/O COLORADO RIVER VALLEY 2300 RIVER FRONTAGE ROAD 468 COUNTY RD 112 473 COUNTY ROAD 112 1411 GREEN MEADOW DRIVE 37 WELLSFORD DRIVE 624 3RD KEY DRIVE C/O BOK CRES BTS -35 C/O BOK CRES BTS -3S C/O BANK OF OKLAHOMA C/O IRON ROSE RANCH C/O IRON ROSE RANCH C/O IRON ROSE RANCH C/O IRON ROSE RANCH 259 ST GERMAINE LANE PO BOX 966 PO BOX 2300 1281 COUNTY ROAD 103 39433 HARBOR HILLS BLVD 1840 HIGH TRAIL PO BOX 12232 PO BOX 717 PO BOX 2300 PO BOX 2300 BTC -3S 5956 SHERRY LANE, SUITE 600 1215 COUNTY ROAD 111 501 WOODEN DEER ROAD 499 WOODEN DEER ROAD 12 WILLIAMS LANE 86 COUNTY ROAD 104 1000 BLUE HERON LANE 1000 BLUE HERON LANE 1000 BLUE HERON LANE 13110 HIGHWAY 82 1000 BLUE HERON LANE CITY SILT CARBONDALE CARBONDALE CARBONDALE GOSHEN FORT LAUDERDALE STATE CO CO CO CO CT FL ZIPCODE SUBNAME 81652 81623-0005 81623 81623 06756-1817 33304 PLEASANT HILL CA 94523 BASALT CO 81621 TULSA CARBONDALE LADY LAKE ATLANTA ASPEN CARBONDALE TULSA TULSA DALLAS CARBONDALE CARBONDALE CARBONDALE CHAPPAQUA CARBONDALE CARBONDALE CARBONDALE CARBONDALE CARBONDALE CARBONDALE OK CO FL GA CO CO 74135 81623 32159 WOODEN DEER SUB 30339 WOODEN DEER SUB 81612 WOODEN DEER SUB 81623-0717 WOODEN DEER SUB FULLADDRESS 468 112 COUNTY RD 473 112 COUNTY RD 535 112 COUNTY RD 481 112 COUNTY RD 475 112 COUNTY RD 477 112 COUNTY RD CALLICOTTE RANCH SUB - DIV 103 COUNTY RD 1281 103 COUNTY RD 980 WOODEN DEER RD 593 WOODEN DEER RD CALLICOTTE RANCH SUB - OK 74135 DIV 103 COUNTY RD CALLICOTTE RANCH SUB - OK 74102 DIV 103 COUNTY RD TX CO CO CO NY CO CO CO CO CO CO 75225 81623-9218 81623 81623 10514-2623 81623-9604 81623 81623 81623 81623 81623 CALLICOTTE RANCH SUB - DIV WOODEN DEER SUB WOODEN DEER SUB WOODEN DEER SUB WOODEN DEER SUB 103 COUNTY RD 501 WOODEN DEER RD 499 WOODEN DEER RD 104 WOODEN DEER RD 86 104 COUNTY RD 13715 82 HWY 14737 82 HWY 1311082 HWY ACRES 0.000 2.010 5.680 4.420 9.940 5.000 6.646 0.511 4.342 7.460 5.990 5.480 4.180 3.710 3.997 5.084 0.000 3.280 5.300 7.870 9.060 77.280 35.000 35.374 5.476 52.600 2.300 Crystal Ranch Corp Concrete Batch Plant Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Major Impact Review Section 5 - Assessor's Map and Adjacent Property Owners Crystal Ranch Corp Property Owners within 200' March 3, 2011 Crystal Ranch Corp Property Parcel Number 239323400131 13112 Highway 82 414.8 Acres ± Note: The number designations for each of the adjoining parcels within 200' of the Crystal Ranch Corp parcel refer to the list of adjacent property owners and addresses on the following page.. Assessors Map with Adjacent Property Owners Crystal Ranch Corp. Property 13112 Highway 82 Carbondale, Colorado 81623 56 1. 239323400361 Thompson Family Trust 259 St. Germaine Lane Pleasant Hill, Ca. 94523 2. 239323400130 Lisa Gail Von Tefs 624 3`d Key Drive Fort Lauderdale, FI. 33304 3. 239323100287 Diane D. Damerau 37 Wellford Drive Goshen, Ct. 06756 4. 239323100282 Loriane & Richard Connor 473 County Road 112 Carbondale, Co. 81623 5. 239323100284 Todd Cramer 1411 Green Meadow Dr. Carbondale, Co. 81623 6. 239323100125 Richard & Denise Hayes 468 County Road 112 Carbondale, Co. 81623-005 7. 239324206026 BOKF NA BK OF OK Attn: BOK CRES BRS-3S PO Box 2300 Tulsa, OK. 74135 8. 239324306027 BOKF NA BK OF OK Attn: BOK CRES BRS-3S PO Box 2300 Tulsa, OK. 74135 9. 239324306028 BOKF NA BK OF OK Attn: BOK CRES BRS-3S PO Box 2300 Tulsa, Ok. 74135 10. 239324306037 BOKF NA BK OF OK Attn: BOK CRES BRS-3S PO Box 2300 Tulsa, OK. 74135 11. 239323400386 John F. & John D. Davis PO Box 2025 Carbondale, Co. 81623 12. 239324300385 John & Pamela Davis 1281 County Road 103 Carbondale, Co. 81623 13. 239324304001 George & Martha Clemons 39433 Harbor Hills Blvd. Lady Lake, FI. 32159 14. 239324304002 Arthur McMahon Family Trust 1840 High Trail Atlanta, Ga. 30339 15. 239324304009 Brad & Julie Hardman PO Box 12232 Aspen, Co. 81612 16. 239324304010 Thomas & Marilyn Hays PO Box 717 Carbondale, Co. 81623 17. 2393250204011 Brian & Sandra Gaddis 1215 County Rd. 111 Carbondale, Co. 81623-9218 18. 239325204012 Christopher & Jonna Sue Coyle 501 Wooden Deer Road Carbondale, Co. 81623 19. 239325204013 Sally Sakin 499 Wooden Deer Road Carbondale, Co. 81623 20. 239325204022 Jonathan & Lucie Fitch 12 Williams Lane Chappaqua, NY 10514-2623 21. 239325300158 Clifford Cerise Ranch Co. 86 County Road 104 Carbondale, Co. 81623 22. 239326300002 Bailey Family Investment Co. C/O Iron Rose Ranch 1000 Blue Heron Lane Carbondale, Co. 81623 23. 239326300003 Bailey Family Investment Co. C/O Iron Rose Ranch 1000 Blue Heron Lane Carbondale, Co. 81623 24. 239326400004 Bailey Family Investment Co. C/O Iron Rose Ranch 1000 Blue Heron Lane Carbondale, Co. 81623 25. 239326300005 Bailey Family Investment Co. C/O Iron Rose Ranch 1000 Blue Heron Lane Carbondale, Co. 81623 26. 239326300006 RYOBI Foundation 13110 Highway 82 Carbondale, Co. 81623 27. 239327100017 Gary Clyde & Catherine Marshall 12748 Hwy. 82 Carbondale, Co. 81623 28. 239327401001 Kathryn Ann & William Bollock 12752 Hwy 82 Carbondale, Co. 81623 29. 239327401004 HIPA HIPA LLC PO Box 5061 Aspen, Co. 81612 30. 239327400033 Thomas & Mary Beth Joiner 12907 Hwy. 82 Carbondale, Co. 81623 31. 23932740035 Thomas & Mary Beth Joiner 12907 Hwy. 82 Carbondale, Co. 81623 32. 239327400036 Michael Stahl 12905 Hwy. 82 Carbondale, Co. 81623 33. 239327100001 Kimiko Powers 13112 Hwy. 82 Carbondale, Co. 81623 34. 239327401004 HIPA HIPA LLC PO Box 5061 Aspen, Co. 81612 35. 239316300954 Bureau of Land Management Attn: Co. River Valley Field Office 2300 River Frontage Road Silt, Co. 81652 36. State Department of Highways 4201 E. Arkansas Ave. Denver, Co. 80222 Project Narrative: Contractors Storage Yard Application 12015 The Applicant is proposing to permit a small contractor's yard on the property currently used as the Powers Pit, located off of County Road 103. The property received approval in 2011 to extend the use of the concrete batch plant on the site, but all mineral extraction has ceased and the site has been almost fully reclaimed. The SUP for powers pit was originally approved by 80-58 and was modified by Resolution 2011-77 for the continued Operation of the concrete batch plant without the gravel extraction activity. Resolution 2012-96 provided for a one-year extension of the approval to meet conditions, and on May 14, 2013 a Land Use Change permit for this use was issued and recorded under reception #835254. The original SUP was granted to John G. Powers for the Extraction of natural resources and the processing of natural resources by the establishment of a gravel washing plant and a concrete batch plant. As part of the 2011 approval, the project was required (in coordination with the Blue Pit) to improve County Road 103. This project was recently completed and comprised realignment, repaving and vacation of unnecessary Right of Way. This property is zoned Rural and is a Rural Employment Center as designated on the Comprehensive Plan 2030 Future Land Use Map. The Applicant anticipates the contractor's yard to be approx. 5.0 or less acres in size and used for general contractor, landscaping and Storage business support. The yard will include activities such as storing and moving of materials such as landscaping material, containers and other temporary equipment and truck/car parking. Because of intermittent use, the Applicant is not proposing to provide potable water (though irrigation is available throughout the site), and wastewater may be managed through the placement and regular servicing of a porta-john. The main office for the facility will be operated out of a separate location (All Valley Storage, located on County Road 113), so no employees will be officed on-site. This application contains two different potential layouts for fenced area sizes in the site plan/drainage plan portion of this application. One shows 32 spaces and the other shows 4 spaces. It is anticipated that the market will drive the final layout of the spaces as they are marketed and individually leased. Site Plan Schematic: 81 Page Contractors Storage Yard Application 12015 Site Photos: View From Highway 82 CONTRACTORS YARD TO BE LOCATED BEHIND BERM: Berm provides 15' to 20' of screening height. • View From County Road 103 CONTRACTORSYARDTO BE LOCATED IN SOUTH WEST CORNER: Adjacent to the existing Ready -mix Plant. 9IPage Contractors Storage Yard Application 12015 Pre -Application Conference Summary : (attached) 101 Page Garfield County Community Development Department 108 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 (970) 945-8212 www.garfield-county.com PRE -APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY TAX PARCEL NUMBER: 2393-23-400-131 PROJECT: Powers Pit Small Contractor's Yard OWNER/APPLICANT: Crystal Ranch Corp REPRESENTATIVE: Bobbie Hapgood (President, CRC) and Travis Stewart (Western Slope Materials) PRACTICAL LOCATION: 13114 State Highway 82 ZONING: Rural TYPE OF APPLICATION: Administrative Review for a "Contractor's Yard, Small" DATE: July 10, 2014 I. GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Applicant is proposing to permit a small contractor's yard on the property currently used as the Powers Pit, located off of County Road 103. The property received approval in 2011 to extend the use of the concrete batch plant on the site, but all mineral extraction has ceased and the site has been almost fully reclaimed. The SUP for powers pit was originally approved by 80-58 and was modified by Resolution 2011-77 for the continued Operation of the concrete batch plant without the gravel extraction activity. Resolution 2012-96 provided for a one-year extension of the approval to meet conditions, and on May 14, 2013 a Land Use Change permit for this use was issued and recorded under reception #835254. The original SUP was granted to John G. Powers for the Extraction of natural resources and the processing of natural resources by the establishment of a gravel washing plant and a concrete batch plant. As part of the 2011 approval, the project was required (in coordination with the Blue Pit) to improve County Road 103. This project was recently completed and comprised realignment, repaving and vacation of unnecessary Right of Way. This property is zoned Rural and is a Rural Employment Center as designated on the Comprehensive Plan 2030 Future Land Use Map. The Applicant anticipates the contractor's yard to be approx. 2.84 acres in size and used for general contractor and landscaping business support. The yard will include activities such as storing and moving of materials such as landscaping material, and other temporary equipment and truck parking. Because of intermittent use, the Applicant is not proposing to provide potable water (thought irrigation is available throughout the site), and wastewater may be managed through the placement and regular servicing of a porta-john. The main office for the facility will be operated out of a separate location (All Valley), so no employees will be officed on-site. II. REGULATORY PROVISIONS APPLICANT IS REQUIRED TO ADDRESS Garfield County Land Use and Development Code, specifically sections: ■ Administrative Review, Section 4-103 ■ Common Review Procedures, Table 4-102 ■ Submittal Requirements, Table 4-201 ■ Article 7, Standards: Division 1, 2, and 3 ■ Section 7-1001, Industrial Uses Standards — Rural CRYSTAL RANCH CORP Address: 13114 82 HWY Parcel Number: 239323400131 Account No: R111336 Reception No: 848456 Tax Area ID: 11 Zoning: Rural Zoom to 1 Planned Unit Dev PUD PUD ryn F k I 1- 7T • J_I_l -44`. III. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS • 4-203.B. General Application Materials • Application Form and Fee • Agreement to pay form • Deed • Statement of Authority and/or letter of authorization. Note: Please include a recorded Statement of Authority for Bobbie Hapgood to act on behalf of Crystal Ranch Corp. • List of mineral owners of record, including names and mailing addresses • Names and mailing addresses of all property owners within 200 feet of the subject parcel and a map showing the subject parcel and the adjacent property owners. • Project narrative • Copy of pre -application conference summary • 4-203.C. Vicinity Map • 4-203.D. Site Plan • 4-203.E. Grading and Drainage Plan Note: Hydraulic and Hydrologic drainage calculations are required is 10,000 sq. ft. or more of impervious surface (including compacted soil) is created. • 4-203.G. Impact Analysis Note: A weed management plan is required for the site — this may already be part of the greater reclamation plan for this site. Please include relevant sections of the reclamation plan, if available. ■ 4-203.L. Traffic Study Note: As represented, this application appears to only require a Basic Traffic Analysis. ■ 4-203. M. Water Supply/Distribution Plan Note: Since no employees are anticipated to be officed or working daily on- site, an acceptable water supply plan can include the responsibility of employees to provide bottled water in their own vehicles and no potable water on-site. ■ 4-203.N. Wastewater Treatment Plan Note: The provision of a maintained porta-john may be acceptable. A contract with a porta-john company would be acceptable evidence that this facility and service will be provided. ■ Respond to all standards in Section 7, Divisions 1, 2 and 3 and Section 7-1001 and submit any additional material (reports, plans, studies, etc) that provides evidence of compliance. Any additional materials to demonstrate compliance with Sections 7, Divisions 1, 2, and 3 and Section 7-1001. Note: Hours of operations may be modified, should the Applicant make the request to waive the standard (7-1001.H.) and request other more appropriate hours of operation. IV. REVIEW PROCESS The process to accommodate these requests shall require an Administrative Review process. (4- 103) process pursuant to the Land Use and Development Code, as amended. A. Pre -application Conference. B. Application Submittal. C. Determination of Completeness. (10 business days for staff review, 60 days for applicant to correct any deficiencies in the submittal) D. Schedule Directors Decision, provide documentation regarding notice requirements in order to satisfy LUDC requirements. E. Additional Copies requested and sent to referral agencies. F. Notice to Adjacent Property Owners and Mineral Owners of Interest at least 15 days prior to date of Director's Decision. G. Evaluation by Director/Staff resulting in a Staff Report and Determination, resulting in a final approval, approval with conditions or denial. H. 10 -day Call -Up period for applicant, BOCC or adjacent property owner to appeal the Director's decision. I. Recording of decision in a Director's Determination Letter. J. If approved, issuance of a Land Use Change Permit based on demonstration of compliance with any conditions of approval. V. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND NOTICE Public Hearing notices shall be posted, mailed and published pursuant to Section 4-101.E. X None Planning Commission Board of County Commissioners No public hearing is required, however, Mailed Public Notice is required to be sent at least 15 days prior to decision to surrounding property owners within 200 feet of the subject property and all mineral owners of interest. Notice shall be consistent with sections 4-101 and 4-103 of the Land Use and Development Code. VI. REFFERALS Referral may include the following agencies: ■ Garfield County Road and Bridge Department ■ Garfield County Environmental Health Manager ■ Garfield County Vegetation Manager ■ Garfield County Consulting Engineer ■ Fire Protection Districts ■ Colorado Parks and Wildlife ■ Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Air Quality Division ■ Town of Carbondale ■ Any other agency deemed appropriate upon review of the submittal VII. APPLICATION REVIEW FEES This application will be subject to the following fees and deposit requirements: Planning Review Fees: $ 250 Plus any additional Staff time charged at staff hourly rate of $40.50 Referral Agency Fees: $Engineering review fee based on hourly rate Total Deposit: $250 General Application Processing Planner reviews case for completeness and sends to referral agencies for comments. Case planner contacts applicant and sets up a site visit. Staff reviews application to determine if it meets standards of review. Case planner makes a recommendation of approval, approval with conditions, or denial to the appropriate hearing body. Disclaimer The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the County. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. This summary does not create a legal or vested right. Pre -application Summary Prepared by: July 10, 2014 Tamra Allen, AICP Date Planning Manager Contractors Storage Yard Application 2015 4-203 Vicinity Map: - Glenwood _ Springs r %' - cinity Map Crystal Ranch Corp. Properly 13112 Highway 62 Carbondale, Colorado 81623 Carbondale ;" 'v. 111 Page Contractors Storage Yard Application 12015 Site Plan & Grading and Drainage Plan (attached) 121 Page �_,c � ` Jam'\�\�\ �-� A/ _ J �-.� . •4R/6 -I; fil• 171;;C:11/C111,-- HIr.-7 :: 1I\ 'i --:-;„ --_ f -_— \\ -- _— — — --- — - - —- J.L :.`i \ l'�l-":. ��5 '{ �+ �/ I ��'�� 1. %-_ _ ___ -— _ \. �,— — .I iL 1, - '� moi,. ,/I, _�L. > ,/� '"'�` �rY 'r _ Il 'L , .��..,\ j'/ — —— --' -- ____ -- �•l'1.1 L'-�.'Ld ._J ✓l+ III ' / ;• / / / , / / - _ - - ---_=_-_, - -� - -- -� -_ - - -- - '_ _ _ - 'ti`s _.",*:� __ • / / / / i / .- - �.1 - - <` ---'_ - - - - -� �� •'� it I .--. _� - -- - -1 _--,1 _ — �_ / / / .. \ `, naok' "� "•c - .- • _ _.— - _ r __ >� ''S_ __ — w — z-__-.7— _ _ _- _� __ a_ — _ _ _ _ / / / / ./ % Y.IVEk i - _ 1��:.... _ et / f— ” `__ - - i l i - r I INITIALS DATE DESIGNED BY DRAWN BY CHECKED BY 1 I _ l / / / ' i` — "' �� "tet �- — - -�__ — -{ — — s:� ` _ --\ r� • ' - - - — -� l'1 ' \ 'off `,� i �� -4- - .. .I - _- _ Ilili I I I � I I I , _– •-.. _ _~. — ;\ \:....1/4,,...-,..„' A 5 ti. L.lra4y,' r, Cxr6on�ffrle - , I I Ve VI C INITY MAP f i SCALE: 1"=2,000' / / � ' I 1 ��• � — / l/ x l l l l )l / i e.^�S �/ / /I i S OPRIS E NGINEERING, LLC. CIVIL CONSULTANTS 502 MAIN STREET CARBONDALE, CO 81623 (970) 704-0311 FAX: (970)-704-0313 77, 5 0 _ -i ' / i 7,- / / / / / i / 1 — t'A �1.01•..4.1.. lit / lli I,I 11,1 i1 Ir EXISTING LEGEND DATE ( l PROPOSED ACCESS ROAD �,`•1� EXISTING CONTOUR } PROPOSED CONTRACTOR'S YARD�,�*•tt'•}!'" 1ti1,' 4' —6200— — EXISTING CONTOUR INTERVAL ,�. \:\\\ .. �\ u'`• �� NN \\\,`� ` t\\� \ R► 11 EXISTING UNITED BATCH PLANT LEASE AREA � 1////r T 1 / 'r' 1 Ott Ream /, -au': x �" 1 1 "' 41 \\1 II11111\�'.,\ j/ j j / EXISTING RETENTION POND ( ` I \lllllllll 1 1 EXISTING { wri./ o i. ri, ' SO c Z37-1Px, TING UNITED BATCH \I .. '�y411 �,III�I�I�Ii' L° EXISTING ASPHALT x PLANT LEASE AREA r{ /t •��1 - 1� / t)1 . Z =� �' - x ��„ SITE BENCHMARK , I , �i//� O ! !,i .. / J� �I J EXISTING GRAVEL o / S1 l T f ji�i ' ;, _� � .ice, ,. ` = — _,_� `_ _ a, _ ) — -� , �f %%'� ,� 1 \• I IIII`Iec \ J✓ /+ PROPOSED LEGEND w ' �a —�,:s -- �— °_ 'gym` �/ /%� 6 s.-___. = ` 4 �„�`�� i. -" �r `/ /` �i i���(�l�� Cs,�o _ � /''/ 3'a ` PROPOSED CONTOUR _.. O�1. '�. �.._ iib r � ✓ ."� 3.- %' 7900 PROPOSED CONTOUR INTERVAL r /:�o .m ��� �/� \ 1 o / > > > > ,` ` -�%` �. = �// PROPOSED SWALE OR DITCH ,q Zit ,rJa"-,0 —=- _ ` /oil`�, /�}/ fli i - ` `'- %.. �,- ic, rl j ���_� �. x PROPOSED FENCE �mei._ ` -ais_� 71� PROPOSED CULVERT .- w 0 1.s h (7 8 V� Tom. I� j//// PROPOSED CONTRACTOR'S LEASE AREA -..--7-� xx :".....->::;-:::.:>__.- �--f-------; /, r � / Y_ �' N PROPOSED GRAVEL 40 GRAPHIC 0 20 40 SCALE 80 160 R'S YARD RADO //� v J LLJ ON I— rl (IN FEET ) CIVIL PLAN INDEX POWERS PIT SMALL CONTRACTO COUNTY OF GARFIELD, COLO COVER SHEET & GENERAL N( ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW APPLICATI 1 inch = i0oft. C1 COVER SHEET & GENERAL NOTES C2 CIVIL SITE PLAN C3 GRADING PLAN C4 CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN 1 C5 CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN 2 SITE BENCHMARK BASIS OF ELEVATION: NAVD 1988 ELEVATION OF 6198.22' ON THE SITE CONTROL POINT TS1 AS SHOWN HERE ON. 811® ipr Know what's below. DATE: 11-20-2014 CaII before you dig. CALL 2-BUSINESS DAYS IN ADVANCE JOB NO. 14196 BEFORE YOU DIG, GRADE, OR EXCAVATE FOR THE MARKING OF UNDERGROUND MEMBER UTILITIES SHEET C1 I 1 `--I ---, I I I !.j I I ;�I/ I , l l - - \ ....7 J \ INITIALS DATE DESIGNED BY DRAWN BY CHECKED BY --__-- -- —� �� I l / 1 i I / ' I / 1. // PROPOSED 2' WIDE / // - -.- / �' / , / ! / I / ' DITCH REFER ---:-s— — l W^1-',„ , / l / / / I / I / I / I TO SHEET C3 \ I I r I ' / h I 1 , , k FENCED TO DEFINE / 11 l , �( l l / l / (; / __ LEASEDk1REA 'EEHDJ i j �'i ' / - i / / h i /-----'- - -. - �a5 / / / �/ h PROPOSED LEASE AREA / / / / / / INCLUDES 5 ACRES ± .,. BROKEN S OPRIS ENGINEERING, LLC. CIVIL CONSULTANTS 502 MAIN STREET CARBONDALE, CO 81623 (970) 704-0311 FAX: (970)-704-0313 , /; ry�h / / ' INTO AS MANY OR AS / / / ��_ 4-/ v �V.o / LEASED LOTS. {SEE SHEETS / / 'I �ti / i - C4 St CS) ti / �... / / / i / �7 /yti �O/ / / / l - - --� // / / / .- --•••„, . / titi�� 1 / / / / /� / /. ' q -�- to �l _ i // / / /moi! / / / / / /b� - / / % _C_ ,,, _� 1 / - /-- <_�� GATE TO BE PLACED �— ; RETENTION`� / / c c� AT BEGINNING OF ACCESS DATE _ ROAD, FOR SECURITY /,�+ �� PROPOSED 24” HDPE D c�'<>��_ CULVERT REFER TO SHEET C3 o+ / / POND / / ///' m O''lNOT INCLUDED NLEASEDl/ 7RoACCESS5pOAD i 0 ii / / ;-� / / ACRES. —T11 ;�0:�04 tii I / / re Z 1.74P 11 6 re 4 li < :T I' (7) i; x I / / r / \ / Io ,�� \ / r EII41'1I / / / I% �' o z �;, # { II k — UNITED BATCH PLANT xk // ) .,.. LEASE AREA... /---_ ~x :---:- = -17:- ---:-. - -.--- cc' ------ - y / • _ - ...e. - . Ilt - - ----- ;-.-- -- : , - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - - - - - - - - -.::: ---S--------„,- / yin 1 — 1 / i..,-- / DWERS PIT SMALL CONTRACTOR'S YARD COUNTY OF GARFIELD, COLORADO CIVIL SITE PLAN ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW APPLICATION _:H \ter �y � ��\\ `- _ . �_ / / � \ \ _ ___ - ----, , ...1,,,,,,,:izzsz _ / / / / 1 :• 1-?..,., I: 11/-7_,,,,I./:;-. z \ \ y 1 �`�F`-" zz zz tet--x.L+l_. �. ` �!Z. / :::::..i.,,r27„:". .____:2P :10 • -\\\ \ �'���' v�\� ft.' / \ 1 / / —J /i/ ii i// // y' L 411, W a EXISTING LEGEND PROPOSED LEGEND EXISTING CONTOUR -- PROPOSED CONTOUR --MO- EXISTING CONTOUR INTERVAL 7900 PROPOSED CONTOUR INTERVAL > > > \ \\ PROPOSED SWALE OR DITCH EXISTING UNITED BATCH PLANT LEASE AREA CL x PROPOSED FENCE --� 8110 GRAPHIC SCALE ///, ^-- — PROPOSED CULVERT EXISTING RETENTION POND / 0 5c no j///%/ / PROPOSED CONTRACTOR'S LEASE AREA Know what's below. DATE: 11-18-2014 IN FEET) PROPOSED GRAVEL a�� before YOU dig. Call( JOB NO. 14196 CALL 2-BUSINL55 DAYS IN ADVANCE.BEFORE 1 inch = SO ft. YOU DIG, GRADE, OR EXCAVATE FOR THE MARKING OF UNDERGROUND MEMBER UTILITIES SHEET C2 RUN @ MIN OF 2% FOR TO RETENTION AtBEGIN DITCH POND EX:6199.91 X I _ k -____ � X -____N / X INITIALS DATE DESIGNED BY DRAWN BY CHECKED BY X / X // h h h / -.. . . EX:6194.n -'-- 4-EX:6194.3'± h i i INV. OUT = 6193.63' / S OPRIS ENGINEERING, LLC. CIVIL CONSULTANTS 502 MAIN STREET CARBONDALE, CO 81623 (970) 704-0311 FAX: (970)-704-0313 - RETENTION �``�cm.. POND,...`ft...< c... EX:6194.8'± C�carC`c�� 24" HDPE 300 L.F. C c @ MIN OF 1% / y� i INV IN: 6196.63 / , DATE �'< f / �� EX:6195.n -- - - -- - -- -- m /, {!„� i , POND NOT COMPLETED, - - PROPOSED ACCESS ROAD i TBC:6195.44' WILL BE GRADED TO A MINIMUM / - /l OF 20.00' DEEP. / — -----—-- /i _%/ fes EX:6196.4'± -—-— 1/ oiPn `/j/7 •t' •�� /- f%, // r `iec % ' _-_�/ � 01 ~ �h \ f° / O 5W cr 41-t" 1 I x o cic?; `• , -_ j \;N =�`_— —_ _-_-_ _ =�• _ _ _ _ _�� - _ _� \ UNITED BATCH PLANT / LEASE AREA / / / / / �_ . sem.: ��_� _`` X \� _ . /. s , • • ,rte ”' _'ham 7. PIT SMALL CONTRACTOR'S YARD NTY OF GARFIELD, COLORADO GRADING PLAN )MINISTRATIVE REVIEW APPLICATION GRAPHIC SCALE <O EXISTING LEGEND PROPOSED LEGEND �� \�/i�% EXISTING CONTOUR PROPOSED CONTOUR /\ L..1( IN FEET) — —bzoo - EXISTING CONTOUR INTERVAL 7900 PROPOSED CONTOUR INTERVAL 12" MIN. in O 1 inch = 40 ft. �\ \\ > PROPOSED SWALE OR DITCH EXISTING UNITED BATCH PLANT LEASE AREA STRUCTURAL MATERIAL T095%STANDARD PROCTOR U X PROPOSED FENCE >>> // %//// PROPOSED CULVERT EXISTING RETENTION POND 4. CL �� 1311 //Z PROPOSED CONTRACTOR'S LEASE AREA / BEDDING OF C LASS6AGGREGATE BASE COURSE a _.._ 12" -...- PROPOSED GRAVEL -� 12" TRENCH CROSS-SECTION FOR Know what's below. DATE: 11-20-2014 Call before you dig. CALL 2-BUSINLSS DAYS IN ADVANCE. ADS OR CMP CULVERTS JOB NO. 14196 BEFORE YOU DIG, GRADE, OR EXCAVATE N.T.S. FOR THE MARKING OF UNDERGROUND MEMBER UTILITIES SHEET C3 1 , � ' I� �l I I l i ' I I 1 I I i I l �, 1 t 1 I i / 1 / r 1 I i ' I / 1 i /' / k iI l k / / / k / / / I PROPOSED FENCED YARDS / 135.25' / / / INITIALS DATE DESIGNED BY DRAWN BY CHECKED BY / 1 / -/ / / / // x / / 120.00' x / 17 - 25 x 60.00' --�`-- __ 332.50' lc 18 S OPRIS ENGINEERING, LLC. CIVIL CONSULTANTS 502 MAIN STREET CARBONDALE, CO 81623 (970) 704-0311 FAX: (970)-704-0313 26 x RETENTION / / 4 POND 19 2 + 7 x + 6 DATE 20 ;. r m } 28 ' PROPOSED ACC ----- / ESS ROAD / } 495.00' i 7 Afir1 x i,/ , ; 29 220.00' —(1/1 9 246.00' II -- - - -- --- _ i11 x 150.00' 1 13 22 1S-- 8 30 x $ -70 z 0 w r 12 23 x UNITED BATCH PLANT 3 14 1 LEASE AREA k / 24 _ k _ 32 /x x X * ERS PIT SMALL CONTRACTOR'S YARD OUNTY OF GARFIELD, COLORADO CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN 1 ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW APPLICATION k EXISTING LEGEND PROPOSED LEGEND EXISTING CONTOUR PROPOSED CONTOUR —6200 — EXISTING CONTOUR INTERVAL 7900 PROPOSED CONTOUR INTERVAL > > > > \\ PROPOSED SWALE OR DITCH EXISTING UNITED BATCH PLANT LEASE AREA U x PROPOSED FENCE O j/ j//// EXISTING RETENTION POND PROPOSED CULVERT CL // 1 GRAPHIC SCALE /81 // PROPOSED CONTRACTOR'S LEASE AREA o 4) 0 _ 10 SO 160 PROPOSED GRAVEL � � Know what's below. DATE: 11-20-2014 ( IN FEET) CaII before you dig. 2-BUSINESS DAYS IN ADVANCE JOB NO. 14196 1 Inch = 40 ft.CALL BEFORE YOU DIG, GRADE, OR EXCAVATE FOR THE MARKING OF UNDERGROUND MEMBER UTILITIES SHEET C4 _ - , - r % , :, I 1 1 ' 1 ; ,', Ir f � I � ; , 1 � , I I � ; 1 1 , ' 1 1 1 ' I i l t ' 1 If I I l ; ;' , 1, 1 r 1, / 1, ; 1 1, 1 1 1' I 1 1 , 1, 1 f, ' ., 11 1, ;, �,;ll;, J �I I ''111, 1 I. „'.'�. II 1' r- 1, '11/ 'r 1 11 71,11 ! , I /- , / /,/l1+ll 111/, 111. Hi 11 1, ,111,.1+11 11 11 �1, 1 ; 1 ' /1/1/////111111111.1 1/1/I1,'111, 11, l l� ;1111/;11+1; 11;''1, 111 �11 i' / 1 /l1 /1 11/7 11111/ 1/ 1 1 / 11 11 11 111 1111 ! 1 / l l 111; 1 / / 1 / 11 1 1 •I l i ;1 i t i •! 1 ' 1+I i ! i / //ll 1/1//1/1/ .1//1 /lll/1 /.'? Il 1/'11 , 1111 // 1111111 1 111/ /111/ /1 , /i 1/ /,',71,1/ 11,/i1'/I ll�/1/01/1 l, 11/1 ,'1///1111 1/' 11/1111.101/1 1r1`/11/11111 /1 1//Ii x 1 I //I 111. 1. 1l l // 111/ 11 / 1 r I, i / / lI / // '1/ ,1 1 III� , i 1 1 .1/ 1 / 1l / l/ 11111/0,' 11f/ k: llrr,/,l l; /11 %/ 11%1.'/ r / l r 11/ llrlll/+;�// /1�1111 11 1///11'///1!/ 11111 /1! 1111' /;11/111 /lli/11//II – 1 /l / //III1/1/11 % 11/1 1111 /l 11'11 k / it/I//rl///r+ / /ill,"' // Ir/11/ /111/ //// /;l//,!Ir111/11 / /' II111 Ill �1 /111/llrrl �' rl1 i 1�11/l /'l1 /ll 1111111 ll/1////+ j �1///l1 1111 J11/1 / ,l/,/' 1/11 ',1/i,'/j / 1'I ////�+//lj•1 // 1111 / '1/1 III 1111 1l //� 1 1171 1//1/1/'1/, /i/ 1//,„;1//�illli l/ '11ll /ill 1,1171' 1111 1/ ,'135.25' INITIALS DATE DESIGNED BY DRAWN BY CHECKED BY — i' I ,1 /' 1, j 1 I l r l!/ l I, r i 1/ I / 1 1 1 PROPOSED FENCED YARDS /, 11 l / rr/ r/// iiiI l l 1 /l / k ' �,.'. / r� 11�r1 1/' !' 1 /'.'/ i ,/ 1/ J1 rl 1 1 ////1,1/7/// l 7/ 1/ ' 1 /r l 1 1, r 71.,//./.,//, 1 l -. "/ /i / 1 r/ / / / r /; , / 1 X i. V' j '.� /r ;1 /1 �%]-1T: -- - 7 - 7 • -7 /+%. /- : /; _ -- -- - - - - - - - .�:i / / '/ / / /. / / / /, / / /' / / . / / .',. / . // / Illi / I 3 S OPRIS ENGINEERING, LLC. CIVIL CONSULTANTS 502 MAIN STREET CARBONDALE, CO 81623 (970) 704-0311 FAX: (970)-704-0313 RETENTION - POND 1 / = --- DATE r m 495'°°' PROPOSED ACCESS ROAD /1 r. IJ11 1/1 / \ 11// 0 l i ,Ii1!,' ' i 1 1. 1 11 I 1/li 11 .1 r 220.00' F / / I I 1 1 \ / 319.00' 2 / 4 1 4 > W ce --• I\. At z ;,,, \ 1, � , 1 l > \ 1' UNITED BATCH PLANT _ \__ LEASE AREA max_ i --x 120.00' — �-_ ��� -- —',-- ��� �- - �'`' — \� — � � - �-- � -- , -- 1 --� - ,\ —� �� —� _ — `� r- —�-- ,-- --- S5 GRAPHIC SCALE EXISTING LEGEND PROPOSED LEGEND ERS PIT SMALL CONTRACTOR'S YARD ;OUNTY OF GARFIELD, COLORADO CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN 2 ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW APPLICATION 40 0 20 40 SJ IF.G EXISTING CONTOUR PROPOSED CONTOUR — — —6200 EXISTING CONTOUR INTERVAL 7900 PROPOSED CONTOUR INTERVAL > > > > (IN FEET) /inch= 40 ft. \I \\ \\ PROPOSED SWALE OR DITCH I EXISTING UNITED BATCH PLANT LEASE AREA U I x PROPOSED FENCE ///:// / / EXISTING RETENTION POND .0.--,...,...„ PROPOSED CULVERT / / / /// /�/ PROPOSED CONTRACTOR'S LEASE AREA PROPOSED GRAVEL below. Know what's DATE: 11-20-2014 CaII before you dig. CALL 2-8USINESS DAYS IN ADVANCE JOB NO. 14196 BEFORE YOU DIG, GRADE, OR EXCAVATE FOR THE MARKING OF UNDERGROUND MEMBER UTILITIES' SHEET C5 I I I I -___ EARTHWORK, EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES: I' / j I I 1 I I i I I I I I iI I I /'� I I I I I , I I i ' I 1 I 1 I I I I i i i 1 1 I I I r I j I I I I 1 Ii I .'' I 1 1 I II iSTABILIZED / / 1 / -- ` / 1, EXISTING AND PROPOSED CONTOURS ARE AT 1' INTERVALS, J -.. - --- - 2. ALL LANDSCAPED AREAS OUTSIDE OF THE CONSTRUCTION DISTURBANCE ZONE SHALL BE / REVEGETATED PER LANDSCAPE SPECIFICATIONS AS SOON AS POSSIBLE AFTER GRADING IS -. COMPLETE. ALL SEEDED AREAS SHALL BE MULCHED AND MATTED IF NEEDED TO PREVENT EROSION �, AND PROMOTE ESTBLISHEMENT OF VEGETATIVE COVER. DISTURBED AREAS ARE ASSUMED WITH ESTABLISHED UNIFORM COVER WITH PLANT DENSITY OF AT LEAST 70% OF \` PRE-DISTURBANCE LEVELS OR EQUIVALENT. SEEDING TO BE APPLIED 6Y HYDROMULCH TECHNIQUES BY A QUALIFIED CONTRACTOR AND/OR OTHER TECHNIQUES PURSUANT TO RECOMMENDATION BY THE LANSCAPE ARCHITECT OR OTHER CONSULTANTS. , 3. SILT FENCE ON THE DOWNHILL SIDE OF ANY DISTURBED AREA SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF SITE GRADING. / I I I I I I j I I I I / -� -- - 4. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE REGULARLY INSPECTED AT LEAST EVERY /•1 i j I I ! I j I. 1 ' / `,. -_ 14 DAYS AND IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING ANY PRECIPITATION EVENT. AN INSPECTION REPORT SHALL ' 1 BE MADE AND A COPY MAINTAINED AT THE SITE. ALL REQUIRED REPAIRS SHALL BE COMPLETED AND f I' ( I I % _ -- / I I i I I I I' ' / MADE IN A TIMELY MANNER, NO LESS THAN 7 DAYS AFTER ANY PRECIPITATION/RUNOFF EVENT. - -- - -/ ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT AND DEBRIS SHALL BE REMOVED FROM ANY SEDIMENT TRAPPING DEVICE INITIALS DATE DESIGNED BY DRAWN BY CHECKED BY %/ / 1 1 f OR AT ANY TIME THAT THE SEDIMENT OR DEBRIS ADVERSELY IMPACTS THE FUNCTIONING OF THE f1 1 1 J SEDIMENT-TRAPPING DEVICE. / ! / iI 1 iif I I f I ( 5. TOPSOIL SHALL BE STOCKPILED TO THE EXTENT PRACTICAL ON SITE FOR USE ON AREAS TO BE / / ' / /f REVEGETATED. ANY AND ALL STOCKPILES SHALL BE APPROPRIATELY LOCATED AND PROTECTED - / I / / ; ( i l FROM EROSIVE ELEMENTS. / / / / / .1 ! / / / 1 / / / �\ 6. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY TRACKING OF SEDIMENT ONTO THE ROADWAYS. _- '- i - 1 / I % /l / 1 / / (r (/ (``/ - ROADWAYS ARE TO BE KEPT CLEAN THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE. / / , J �% , / / / k 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTAIN HIS CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS TO THE SITE BOUNDARIES AND k _ k SPECIFIED RIGHT OF WAY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT OPERATE OUTSIDE THIS AREA WITHOUT THE J : - / / �' '•v PRIOR EXPRESSED CONSENT OF THE OWNERS. /% /l/ I k 8, DUST CAUSED BY EXCAVATION, TOPSOIL REMOVAL OPERATIONS, OR ROAD BASE PLACEMENT SHALL E- / / ) • / / / / / / � / / _ k BE CONTROLLED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT HIS EXPENSE. THE ENGINEER OR CITY MAY REQUIRE THE / 45 % %' CONTRACTOR AT ANY TIME TO DISCONTINUE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES UNTIL DUST EMISSIONS ARE Gk 7__ �0 / L- MITIGATED. / X k _ �, / / / / / o 9. THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE REQUIRED TO FURNISH AND APPLY A DUST PALLIATIVE ON THE SITE AS \ % / / -- roo/ i / / / �• '/ - DIRECTED BY THE CITY. DUST PALLIATIVE MAY CONSIST OF WATER OR A NON-POLLUTING SOLUTION. - _ 7 / 7' \GI <7 / i / / / / ) SPREADING OF WATER OR WATER MIXTURE SHALL BE DONE WITH ACCEPTABLE SPRINKLING i - / / �. /' / / / / / / / v EQUIPMENT. ALL DUST CONTROL SHALL EXTEND BEYOND THE CONSTRUCTION AREA PROPER TO THE 7" / . y �.yh4 / i / /1 / / / / SIDE STREETS ENTERING AND EXISTING THE PROJECT, WHERE MUD AND DIRT FROM CONSTRUCTION /___ - j / / a / EQUIPMENT, AS WELL AS LOCAL TRAFFIC, MAY GET ONTO THE SIDE STREETS. CLEANUP OF THESE h '---- .---/ 6ti i/ / AREAS WILL BE REQUIRED AS NECESSARY OR AS DIRECTED BY THE CITY. % ° % / / / / x / / ti3� / / / 10. VEHICLE TRACKING CONTROL DEVICES (MUD RACKS) SHALL BE PROVIDED AT CONSTRUCTION ` / 7-- 7' _,---/.:--,-;,-\ 3 / S - ENTRANCES. THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTENANCE OF THESE DEVICES. /% /. �' ,. �f eti / ` / S OPRIS E NGINEERING, LLC. CIVIL CONSULTANTS 502 MAIN STREET CARBONDALE, CO 81623 (970) 704-0311 FAX: (970)-704-0313 /' i .7 / / j /� - - /� etitiy / = % ¢ / do / / G J / ,. ,/ \� / � / /6/. l- til / / / - / / , / _ lam . 7 .Z �. / .,19'-' / / �i ��- \ / / / / f - i / \ ' - R ETE NT14• ` __ _ 11. CONTRACTOR TO UTILIZE "BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES" TO CONTROL EROSION AND / SEDIMENTATION DURING CONSTRUCTION. NO SEDIMENT SHALL LEAVE SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION. k - - 12. CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR INSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE, INSPECTION, REPAIR AND REMOVAL J `� - -_._ _'_-_ ____- - OF TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROLS. / 13. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN SEDIMENT AND EROSION PROTECTION THROUGHOUT THE < it VEHICLE TRACKING CONTROL 1 _ - CONSTRUCTION OPERATION. SILT FENCES OR OTHER NECESSARY EROSION PROTECTION SHALL Co <_ SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL ALL DISTURBED AREAS HAVE BEEN REVEGETATED WITH ESTABLISHED <�< UNIFORM COVER WITH PLANT DENSITY OF AT LEAST 70% OF PRE-DISTURBANCE LEVELS OR EQUIVALENT. << % / POND BE SUCCESSFULLY REVEGETATED AND MAINTAINED IN A f .\ / '// /( ,/ / � / / CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL <_<_< SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG . '�+ 14. ALL DOM NABEDLAREAS Y WEED FREE CONDITION. '-- - / ,( / / SILT FENCE < iittilt DATE _ / 1 / s� • I \---. (-• 44 44;k4w >- e. f \ PROPOSED ACCESS I . '. SS ROAD �� �.� .a ghlibilbi iglibmosorail, REVISION /( / II - 11 /./; 1'f k� i / \i 'o / ti� . :1 li) ti • , I ` � • '` UNITED • SEDIMENTATION LOG - 12" MIN. DIAMETER 2s' MAXIM BATCH PLANT -•, •'•4. �•Z,.. ' '� 114S-44.,... \;.► _- /, ."•e. .. �_ ' v'1 \� �/ i • ••••�• y + +) +� �� \�=` =� LEASE AREAN. •• �6 •'may 1 ! USE A STAKE EVERY 24" AT ALTERNATE 90 DEGREE ` OORIC�ENTATION THROUGHOUT THE SEDIMENTATION iv,,'.r SALT FENCE ��� �` J� -- -'is...z.j..:::: ��� ' `� k - Ift \• �.+C1 �-- �_ \ _�� . - -- r, /' / ' 1�'EMBED a oLENGTH USE TWO STAKES 11/2' x 11/2 "x SUFFICIENT TO P /ni g Gq• ` OZ .`- \�----�.�/f AT LEAST I2" INTO SOIL AT EACH END OF LOG- �k -��` �'_ --. .. ` _.`��. \ `.%"J• _,r_1F� k -. - _. ..�� __ = i `\ - i x. // _\�I �'\-1,` i/�.\l- _� ��' ` `_�.`� ~ 1+1 __ / / - _ _ - _ __ "n, f _. i / \/ /� f/ TAKE AT 90 DEG / \w ea / �/� / TO EACH OTHER 1> / %%/ //f////�/ ' FEATURES / %i /// //// / / PROTECTION° / x' // / /-7200 a REQUIRING " • °o'SIIT i - FENCE INSTALLATION �� _ ,� iry°�\ 3 PIT SMALL CONTRACTOR'S YARD NTY OF GARFIELD, COLORADO EROSION CONTROL PLAN )MINISTRATIVE REVIEW APPLICATION 11 \ / /// ``-at // .;\17_ i' // -NTS /\::: 77 J ' ,�1 /hr/7 i ` �II' �;_ \ �rVV f / ,•`'% / i -3- \ \ �." , -� ` \ ' ik ___-f "F '/ •�2.' ,,.l F./ / 1 ��..r+. NOTE: `l t .� \ \_ `` `- , - K �.; "+) ✓/^yf R SECTION A-A 1-_ POST ANCHORED TO FABRIC MATERIAL _ .�_\ - _� \ _ -- _ - - ` =� = _x. .j�':'+'5! ` ` -...--111111.-EROSION CONTROL MEASURES ``` ` = \ - -- _ -2:- _/ ,( __ ," _ .1 _ _ _ ` ` ` .,�� ` - '� ��L*r� _ ,.'.. I �r . -_.'1.:/,',/,' - - SHALL BE MAINTAINED UNTIL e„• l _- �-� _ ./; �I SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG INSTALLATION NOTES 1 LANDSCAPING IS COMPLETED, (ANCHORED IN TRENCH) \ -_�.'� - -=-___-_- - �"UA / �� - 1. SLE PLAN VIEW FOR; LOCATION OF SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG. l �` '� �` ` �\ '- �- j r_--�. \"..\ �' _ -`� - r l l�+ ,-r. +� i' F 1..:�. _-- OR AS DIRECTED BY LOCAL -. \� ``-� 1 .'� _ 2. SEDIMENT LOGS SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO ANY ` „---- _ :T-. _ `" �� y� _ _; ,�I f fir+ + + ; - JURISDICTION 4x4" ` \ ` �__- ��---..C--_----,.4---•-... \ �� _ :} _-- f -- � - ` ` ^,� `'-`�` -.- \ f.) + te 1� i\� \ `- '` m - =_ - x`--. �/ ®� %- J _ e LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES, - -i / 1= „�' __` ate )' !.,Or Q: �'=` � ,,,�, 3, SEDIMENT CONTROL LOGS SHALL CONSIST OF STRAW, ....` \ TRENCH _. \ W - , ���- ( ` �- -7- - �, �• COMPOST, EXCELSIOR OR COCONUT FIBER. \_ �-'/ /- h r �` �/ COMPACTED ` _ y ` - =_ 1 ' _ _ �fi '% - - -� _ -- J - - (/� / / Y S THE SEDIMENT CONTROL LOGS SHA BE TRENCHED =.�+!� i�---.--C---, �ra� 4. NOT FOR USE IN CONCENTRATED FLOW AREAS. HED INTO THE I BACKFILL _ F ., _ _ `_\` \ _.-__-- ` \ % �- _��_ �V }�`" x +1 +e {"�/� --,^ ='�� - - I/ . 4.' ��� _S GROUND A MINIMUM OF 2-INCHES LL • FLOW `` \ ` ---� __ ` � ,~ 1.) �. i 11// �f - / \ , / SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG MAINTENANCE NOTES �� �_ �� + �� _� -�-� ' �•*�'. = 1=- // ,-r=te/ - --`` �';`�, ;• o.E` \\\ -"2' ice• 1. THE SWMP MANAGER SHALL INSPECT SEDIMENT CONTROL LOGS DAILY, -� ` ` _ >=-�:: x 11�,•'%� 1/2H -,.-----c__________--------, - - ` \ �` �-� \\ - �` > -. '-! ) �') j UPSTREAM SEDIMENT AS NDURING AND AFTER ANY ORM EVENT &MAKE REPAIRS OR CLEANOUT (12" MINI ti = n _0 1 _ - • - r N3 �1 p - `� ` �. Xj / - -_ __ - Z : -` . \�\ '-, r -.y 2. SEDIMENT ACCUMULATED UPSTREAM OF SEDIMENT CONTROL LOGS ` • -``\ _ `� ` - _ ` ` h111,A,,, �. -,J� C: �~ �+•���1� \ v �• �,/ / (/ -' _ ', j SHALL BE REMOVED WHEN THE UPSTREAM DEPTH IS WITHIN i THE NM/ (. ,. - -. , \, --_ 1 --- - ) �`-' ., . `�`�� ..-./ / /' 'ti/ HEIGHT OF THE CREST OF LOG. SECTION GRAPHIC SCALE GRAPHIC PROPOSED LEGEND 3. SEDIMENT CONTROL LOGS SHALL BE REMOVED AT THE END OF SY -NTS- NTS- CONSTRUCTION, ONCE PROPER VEGETATION HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED. IF ANY DISTURBED AREA EXISTS AFTER REMOVAL IT SHALL BE COVERED SILT FENCE DETAIL 60 0 30 60 120 240 WITH TOPSOIL AND REVEGETATED/STABILIZED IN A MANNER APPROVED 3"MINUS ROCK, (OR BY THE LOCAL JURISDICTION. (NOT TO SCALE) - ` PROPOSED CONTOUR RECYCLED CONCRETE 7900 >z' MIN. SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG PROPOSED CONTOUR INTERVAL POWER COU ( IN FEET) > > > > (NOT TO SCALE) PROPOSED SWALE OR DITCH 6" OF ROCK 1 inch = 60 ft. X PROPOSED FENCE • _•; _ _ BASE COURSE _ _, _• _ "r ' ' `- ' PROPOSED CULVERT EXISTING LEGEND SF PROPOSED SILT FENCE - MIRAFI EXISTING CONTOUR EXISTING FABRIC SCL PROPOSED EROSION CONTROL LOG NOTES GRADE - -6200 - EXISTING CONTOUR INTERVAL t. ALL ROCK TO BE REMOVED UPON COMPLETION OF PROPOSED GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION. \110r \ 2. PUBLIC ROADWAY TO BE KEPT CLEAN AND FREE OF \ \\ EXISTING UNITED BATCH PLANT LEASE AREA MUD, DIRT AND DEBRIS AT ALL TIMES. 3. ALIGNMENT OF CONSTRUCTION ACCESS SHALL Know what's bel ow. PROVI/ E A NGTH OF 40 FT MEASURED DATE: 02-09-2015 %/// EXISTING RETENTION POND PROPOSED VEHICLE TRACKING CONTROL PAD FROMTHE CENTERLINE 1I I before you dig. /% VEHICLE TRACKING CONTROL CALL 2-BUSINESS DAYS IN ADVANCE JOB NO. 14196 DIG,i OR N.T.S. BEFORE FOR THEOU MARKINGRADE, OF U DERG OAUNDE MEMBER UTILITIES SHEET C3.2 _ .. _ _ -- -- , \ ._/ f \ __ N \ \ .. \\ __-bt2„ _ _ �� ' __ �_ _ 7 \ 1. __ -- �6340 - _ _ - - - `� - _- - ___ / / 6330 1 / /L I v. ? - • - _ - _ ---• �- r` •C�7ia.. S•T•AAA•�i- i��JB�A To-.�� -` �_-'` I -- x CD au =•/0••••ae0•0a00•0e••►•iz !+++i+i+..++i+•++e++++++++-++-eYeAJ�e+++++++.iii iiiliiiiieiiieiieiiAeiiii+e•; - -- _-- + -__+0 ® j-� e••••••••••••~444+++oo+A+OAi b.Oo•o••••J•i••••••i+A•••••O•oiia-)-7:1.7� __� oe - 6340- 0 saeaJ+oo+o+•oe••• 0••ee•+o+o••• •••••••••••••••'"- .P :!'� -,_,p �` t__- **4•04:11•••••••••••••••••••••••• ♦OO••••••••-••e•e•- 9• - DESIGNED BY I J DRAWN BY L 1 J CHECKED BY1 _.�0 atA+•ai+•ea°iooi4 e•••••Vi•••e•oa••••i!i!e••ee! Contractors Storage Yard Application 12015 2011 SUP Impact Analysis: (attached) 141 Page INo changes' [No changes' Contractors Storage Yard Application 2015 4-203 G Impact Analysis: Crystal Ranch Corp. has recently completed a Full Impact Analysis as Part of the 2011 SUP for this property. That Analysis as well as the supporting documents are attached. This application falls within the contemplated uses of that approval. Changes or alterations to the 2011 responses are provided below. 1. Adjacent Land Use. Existing use of adjacent property and neighboring properties within 1,500 -foot radius. [The Cerise Property Located Directly East of the Property (across CR 1030 was approved for a Sand and Gravel Operation, this was approved in January of 2015.] 2. Site Features. A description of site features such as streams, areas subject to flooding, lakes, high ground water areas, topography, vegetative cover, climatology, and other features that may aid in the evaluation of the proposed development. [No changes] 3. Soil Characteristics. A description of soil characteristics of the site that have a significant influence on the proposed use of the land. [No changes] 4. Geology and Hazard. A description of the geologic characteristics of the area including any potential natural or manmade hazards, and a determination of what effect such factors would have on the proposed use of the land. [No changes] 5. Groundwater and Aquifer Recharge Areas. Evaluation of the relationship of the subject parcel to Floodplains, the nature of soils and subsoils and their ability to adequately support waste disposal, the Slope of the land, the effect of sewage effluents, and the pollution of surface Runoff, stream flow, and groundwater. 6. Environmental Impacts. Determination of the existing environmental conditions on the parcel to be developed and the effects of development on those conditions, including: a. Determination of the long-term and short-term effect on flora and fauna; b. Determination of the effect on designated environmental resources, including critical wildlife habitat; c. Impacts on wildlife and domestic animals through creation of hazardous attractions, alteration of existing native vegetation, blockade of migration routes, use patterns, or other disruptions; [No changes] and [No changes] d. Evaluation of any potential radiation hazard that may have been identified by the State or County Health Departments. [No changes] 7. Nuisance. Impacts on adjacent land from generation of vapor, dust, smoke, noise, glare or vibration, or other emanations. [No changes] 8. Hours of Operation. The Applicant shall submit information on the hours operation of the proposed use. [Hours of Use are contemplated as 6am to 8pm Monday thru Saturday.] 131 Page 4-203 Impact Analysis 12015 Additional Changes to the Attached 2011 Impact Analysis: A. 4 -203(E)(21) -SPCC Plan- As Shown on the site plan layouts and in the attached lease, the storage of fuels/wastes or any other hazardous materials that would require an SPCC plan are not permitted to be stored at this site. An SPCC plan is not applicable and one does not exist for the contractor yard. B. 4-203(E)(17)-Stormwater Management Plan: It is the opinion of our consulting Engineer, Sopris Engineering that a Stormwater Management Plan is not required for the following reasons: 1. There is a SWMP in place for the gravel pit which is Lafarge's permit (Permit #COR03K496). You cannot have more than one SWMP for one site, so you should be covered by their permit. 2. Also, the site is currently being reclaimed by LaFarge and once they reach substantial completion, they have a 2 -year maintenance warranty in place with the owner. This is a requirement of the MLRB Permit and the Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Act. Wage Crystal Ranch Corp Concrete Batch Plant Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Major Impact Review Section 12 - Impact Analysis (4-502(E)) Section 12 - Impact Analysis (4-502(E)) The Impact Analysis shall provide a description of the impacts that the proposed land use change may cause, based upon the standards that the proposed use must satisfy. The Impact Analysis shall include a complete description of how the applicant will ensure that impacts will be mitigated and standards will be satisfied. The following information shall be included in the Impact Analysis. a. Adjacent Property. An address list of real property adjacent to the subject property, and the mailing address for each of the property owners. [TLS] Applicant Response: An address list of real property adjacent to the subject property, and the mailing address for each of the property owners has been provided in Section 5 of this document. b. Adjacent Land Use. Existing use of adjacent property and neighboring properties within 1500' radius. (TLS] Applicant Response: See the following graphic depiction of existing use of adjacent property and neighboring properties within 1500' radius. 109 Crystal Ranch Corp Concrete Batch Plant Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Major Impact Review Section 12 - Impact Analysis (4-502(E)) Crystal Ranch Corp Adjacent Land Uses r r---- 1 1 1 1 1 -f~ 1,500° ____ Bureau of Land Management Rural Residential Uses 1 1 ooden Deer I Rural Residentially eft • • Ag. Uses Carbondale .Q,4 G9' Rural Residential Ag. Uses Jso • Highway 82 Ranch at Roaring Rourvitg Fort Rh,' Ji# Sharp Tracts G.4.0 C d for* Pr!3erve 1 I Rowing Fork Pn-se Mayfly Send Ranh Twp Rng Margin Labels Section Numbers Sections 0 Townships 0 State or Federal Highway State, Federal Highway =I-70 County Road LocalStreets City Streets Trails Airports Subdivisions Railroad State Wildlife Area Rivers and Lakes US Naval 011 Shale reserve (BLM) Streams and Ditches State Recreation Area County Lines ( l City or Town li Federal Land BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, DP INDICATES DISPOSAL US FOREST SERVICE 110 Crystal Ranch Corp Concrete Batch Plant Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Major Impact Review Section 12 - Impact Analysis (4-502(E)) c. Site Features. A description of site features such as streams, areas subject to flooding, lakes, high ground water areas, topography, vegetative cover, climatology, and other features that may aid in the evaluation of the proposed development. [TLS and SE] Applicant Response: Please refer to the Engineering Report by Sopris Engineering, dated 6-24-11 for this information. d. Soil Characteristics. A description of soil characteristics of the site that have a significant influence on the proposed use of the land. [CTL] Applicant Response: Our understanding is that the proposed use of land is to continue the operation of the concrete batch plant. We do not foresee the soils at the site posing a significant constraint for continuation of concrete batch plant uses. The soils at the site are generally favorable for currently planned and possible future use. e. Geology and Hazard. A description of the geologic characteristics of the area including any potential natural or man-made hazards, and a determination of what effect such factors would have on the proposed use of the land. [CTL] Applicant Response: Geology and hazards have been delineated by CTL/Thompson's project geologist and are attached as an Exhibit. CTL/Thompson's Summary of Conclusions is as follows: 1. No geologic or geotechnical conditions were identified which would preclude the planned development of this site. Collapse -prone soils outside of the pit area and potential for sink hole formation related to Eagle Valley Evaporite are the primary geologic concerns. 2. The subsurface conditions encountered in our exploratory pits generally were man - placed fill consisting of aggregate base course and crusher fines underlain by clean to slightly silty gravel to the maximum explored depth of 12 feet. Four feet of sandy clay -silt was encountered in the bottom of our exploratory pit TP -2. 3. We did not encounter ground water in our exploratory pits at the time of exploratory excavation operations. Our exploratory pits were backfilled immediately after exploratory excavation operations were completed. 4. We anticipate footing or slab foundations will be appropriate for buildings constructed at the site. 111 Crystal Ranch Corp Concrete Batch Plant Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Major Impact Review Section 12 - Impact Analysis (4-502(E)) 5. Asphalt or asphalt with aggregate base course are suitable for access roads and parking lots. Details are presented in this report. f. Effect on Existing Water Supply and Adequacy of Supply. Evaluation of the effect of the proposed land use on the capacity of the source of water supply to meet existing and future domestic and agricultural requirements and meeting the adequate water supply requirements of Section 7-104. [SE and ZA] Applicant Response: Please refer to the Engineering Report by Sopris Engineering, dated 6-24-11 for this information. g. Effect on Groundwater and Aquifer Recharge Areas. Evaluation of the relationship of the subject parcel to floodplains, the nature of soils and subsoils and their ability to adequately support waste disposal, the slope of the land, the effect of sewage effluents, and the pollution of surface runoff, stream flow and groundwater. [CTL] Applicant Response: The nearest floodplain to the Powers Pit Concrete Plant is the Roaring Fork River floodplain, approximately 1/4 mile to the south. Proposed uses of the site do not include waste disposal. CTL I Thompson, Inc. has previously provided a slope stability analysis for the Powers Pit under our Project No. GS05464-145, dated May 6,2010. h. Environmental Effects. Determination of the existing environmental conditions on the parcel to be developed and the effects of development on those conditions, including: (1) Determination of the long term and short term effect on flora and fauna. [TLS] Applicant Response: The long term and short term affects on the flora and fauna associated with the continuation of the concrete batch plant operations at the Powers Pit are addressed in numerous sections of this application. Wildlife (fauna) is addressed in the following section and proposes that there will be no impacts on wildlife and domestic animals through creation of hazardous attractions, alteration of existing native vegetation, blockade of migration routes, use patterns or other disruptions. Enhancements to on site vegetation to enhance the "flora" of the site are addressed in the reclamation plans as prepared by Sopris Engineering and The Land Studio and included as an Exhibit in this document. The Powers Pit Concrete Batch Plant Drainage Study prepared by Sopris Engineering, dated 6-24-11 is attached as an Exhibit to this document and addresses the control of surface drainage on the site to contain the runoff insuring no negative impacts to surrounding vegetation. 112 Crystal Ranch Corp Concrete Batch Plant Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Major Impact Review Section 12 - Impact Analysis (4-502(E)) (2) Determination of the effect on significant archaeological, cultural, paleontological, historic resources. [TLS] Applicant Response: The concrete batch plant operation has been the long-term use on the property and there are no significant archaeological, cultural, paleontological, or historic resources effected by this operation. (3) Determination of the effect on designated environmental resources, including critical wildlife habitat. (TLS] (a) Impacts on wildlife and domestic animals through creation of hazardous attractions, alteration of existing native vegetation, blockade of migration routes, use patterns or other disruptions. Applicant Response: Of the 45 Colorado Division of Wildlife amphibian, fish, reptile, mammal, bird and raptor habitat areas mapped on the Garfield County GIS website (http://gismaps.garfield- county.com/Wildlife/) there are five categories that have mapping related to the concrete batch plant site including black bear overall range, mountain lion overall range, bald eagle winter range, elk overall range, and mule deer summer and critical winter range. Maps illustrating these wildlife habitat designations follow this narrative. Impacts on Wildlife by Creation of Hazardous Attractions No hazardous attractions to wildlife are proposed for the concrete batch plant site. As noted above, this site is within the black bear overall range so bear proof containers will be utilized for trash disposal that might contain materials attractive to black bears. Impacts on Wildlife by Alteration of Existing Native Vegetation The concrete batch plant site is currently devoid of any native vegetation as it has been operating long-term as a concrete batch plant and the area around the concrete batch plant has been quarried for sand and gravel. As a result no vegetation exists on the concrete batch plant site that is considered native habitat. While the CDOW mapping illustrates portions of the concrete batch plant site as mule deer "critical winter range" there is no vegetation or habitat on this site to support this designation. It is likely that winter range will be established for mule deer as the revegetation plant materials are established around the concrete batch plan site. Impacts on Wildlife by Blockade of Migration Routes 113 Crystal Ranch Corp Concrete Batch Plant Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Major Impact Review Section 12 - Impact Analysis (4-502(E)) The only migration corridors identified near the concrete batch plant site are for elk and mule deer. As can be seen from the attached elk and mule deer habitat maps, the site does not block these corridors. Impacts on Wildlife by Use Patterns or Other Disruptions The use patterns associated with the concrete batch plant have been in place long-term at this site. The major change in use at this site is that the extraction of sand and gravel aggregates will cease while the concrete batch plant operations will continue until the year 2028 on a 5.8 acre portion of the site. This reduced activity will benefit wildlife as well as the commitment to revegetate the 60+ acres of the site that have been disturbed by the sand and gravel extraction operations. The reclamation plan referred to in this application identifies a number of plant species including native and pasture grass mixtures that will create habitat for elk and deer on south facing slopes. Again, it is likely that winter range will be established for mule deer and elk as the revegetation plant materials are established around the concrete batch plan site. Mountain Lion habitat is established by the presence of "prey" as noted in "Mountain Lion Management Guidelines" prepared by Darby Finley, Terrestrial Wildlife Biologist, Meeker, Colorado for the CDOW Northwest Region. According to this document, "Colorado's elk populations are the highest anywhere in the United States and provide alternate prey for the lion's principle food base of mule deer". As mentioned previously, there is no mule deer or elk habitat on the concrete batch plant site to attract deer, elk, or mountain lions to the site. Although bald eagle winter range is identified in the CDOW Garfield County GIS mapping, no bald eagle roosting or nesting sites have been identified by the CDOW in the Garfield County GIS website for this area. Again, the amount of activity at the Powers Pit Concrete Batch Plant site will be greatly reduced when the aggregate extraction leaves the property and only the concrete batch plant activities continue. 114 Crystal Ranch Corp Concrete Batch Plant Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Major Impact Review Section 12 - Impact Analysis (4-502(E)) Crystal Ranch Corp - CDOW Black Bear Habitat County U ges SEKeit Feces! htlR;nway ®7 : eters-aItr-Rural '2'111 interstate -Urban. 115112 f reeway+-Urtai CGLItaly Rime CIL-4 5tr ets Localareelm Trails Rai Irma Rivers area Lakes -Streams a,d 'lI Lehes tlVi or Town I Buck Bt•r L* r hI "_ar?tlIct FTB Black !.ear rd 1 Lupo,'LrdCl Areal. Mack Rear Muy tIni emrrk nrs €!lack beer SLor^mer colcentratlan Aoeas Mark. Neer n kern!! kange 115 Crystal Ranch Corp Concrete Batch Plant Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Major Impact Review Section 12 - Impact Analysis (4-502(E)) Crystal Ranch Corp - CDOW untain Lion Habitat irmrty 1 Ire 5ttc or Foecral H ghway Irrter=_tatt- Rwal `l] neer ate 1.119in Pr eTwity-Limen Carntyf R,vZed tty Strtt. 1 nrn titrrttz Rail ] R vers aha Lake&• 'Cd 11 and bItdl- ra-10 45- TONI L: Mt Lan HLr1]n Conflict Mx Lon Peripheral Range PCT Lon Cveral; Range 116 Crystal Ranch Corp Concrete Batch Plant Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Major Impact Review Section 12 - Impact Analysis (4-502(E)) Crystal Ranch Corp - CDOW Bald Eagle Habitat crnrlIw v Lines State ar Federal Fl10;4411. Cnte+state-Rural 1111rEerr to-LIta 1 m12. FTeva r Ir l tourry Road tzy Streets LW-AIStreets :Falls I'sa r&7 Rrverr ani Lakes strrn ms nrr7 p Wiles City or 'to -An Ba!tl Eagle +Cnmrr it I Itmost MIL Lang a Rns_ J tes Illy Bala Eine WI ikt:r Concarriation Rain Eng e W l rrtrr tight Rarest Saes Bald Lege Sur+rne- Forage Areas flab Enge WI,ter Parer}.- Areas Bahl I5NJI Active f Saeii Bald Balt wl•rter FL,t1113U B�!la Eagle Lurtkwm '4FeLlt Sites Bala Eagle llaalwe brag SIMS 117 Crystal Ranch Corp Concrete Batch Plant Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Major Impact Review Section 12 - Impact Analysis (4-502(E)) Crystal Ranch Corp - CDOW Elk Habitat tater L Ls, 4 :. 11IgItygn. — L =1 lrii'mr5LaLe-ILvr3 Streart7s aro 0 tines =1_ 1°rtersta a -Lunn R.znlroes RI2 011,0 Lakes 0112 freeway- Jrbrr, Cuurrr? Mac City SLrLs malls City .or Morn Bk Cr0551911 Geocatu.GLSCATADWNER.Ekky`1rrtcrCexentratIorA'ca2U]B k L411:Led u9t Artieyear 3ira.{,LSCrATA,GWriEk-Ek .irierl irtrpc2rNNS 1;1 ¢ MIgratrnn Cm -Oars Mk Overall Fta E k P+A+1uctiun Area LIK Rrrsrdr. t Ele Summer artcr-rtraban Areas Ht Surrir er Pax* LIK ncyrrc W rater ■ 118 Crystal Ranch Corp Concrete Batch Plant Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Major Impact Review Section 12 - Impact Analysis (4-502(E)) Crystal Ranch Corp - CDOW Mule Deer Habitat Ulundi uiee Stott' orFet imi FFlg�wrp i1 Inter to -Rural =11 interstice- Jrbar4 cit Freeway, Li -Da 9 County Rand City Struts Lr'+rSi I5r Railroad Iilvgrs arnd Lok+.c Streams arid att'Ie5 'My' Of raven Mtde Dear IgenliaV tr EInp • kyle Dee: MFgyatlor4 Corridors 4t�1� Leer kesIcent FGpo,K n rrr- rrltlr2i WiTt4ff Range • L Ic Li r Severe Winer Rani 9t_Ie beer WlnLer Carrsntration Arca% • `tile peer Winter 11.3r►2i while Geer SW"' !VIE!' ka°rge MiIr nef.r 1 tmILr j L Arrr_ 54.1r fl .r d1vr- ell karxsr rri 119 Crystal Ranch Corp Concrete Batch Plant Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Major Impact Review Section 12 - Impact Analysis (4-502(E)) (4) Evaluation of any potential radiation hazard that may have been identified by the State or County Health Departments. [CTL] Applicant Response: We performed a background radiation survey of the Powers Pit Concrete Plant on April 27, 2011. We found that radiation at the site to be 0 to 3 pRemlhr. We consider this to be normal background radiation for this area of Garfield County. (5) Spill Prevention Control and Counter Measures plan, if applicable. [TLS and Lafarge] Applicant Response: The Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan prepared by Lafarge West, Inc. is attached as an exhibit to this document. i. Traffic. Assessment of traffic impacts based upon a traffic study prepared in compliance with Section 4-502(J). [SE and SH] Applicant Response: The Powers Batch Plant will not have major negative impacts on transportation, services, and facilities. Some of the possible impacts were evaluated in the Traffic Impact Study called" LaFarge West Cerise Site" by Eugene G. Coppola, PE, PTOE, dated 8.4.10 and attached as a Traffic Exhibit. LaFarge and Crystal River Corp have entered into a lease agreement to allow the existing concrete batch plant to remain on Crystal Ranch property through the year 2028. This leads to the following conclusions: 0o The Project traffic identified in the Cerise Study would now travel to either the Crystal Ranch Site or the Cerise Site, along CR -103 If approved, some Project traffic that was considered internal trips to the Cerise Site (not identified) will now travel back and forth between the Cerise Site and the Crystal Ranch Site. This is addressed in the Memorandum from Turnkey Consulting The amount of Project traffic traveling through the intersection of SH -82 & CR -103 would not change from the values shown in the Cerise Study. 0o The Cerise Study accurately portrays total traffic and is valid for use in CDOT access permitting. Summary of Transportation Facility Improvement Recommendations The following improvements are recommended at the intersection of CR -103 & Powers Site Access: Construct a northbound left -turn deceleration lane. 120 Crystal Ranch Corp Concrete Batch Plant Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Major Impact Review Section 12 - Impact Analysis (4-502(E)) Turning radii should be capable of serving a WB -67 design vehicle. Truck warning signs should be installed on the CR -103 approaches to the site access with a stop sign installed on the access approach to CR -103. The following improvements are recommended at the intersection of CR -103 & SH -82: 00 Construct a southbound left -turn deceleration lane on CR -103. Two existing auxiliary lanes on SH -82, to the east of CR -103, should be lengthened to meet current CDOT design standards: o Westbound right turn deceleration lane — extend by 600 -ft (1,100 req'd, 500 existing) o Southbound -to -eastbound left turn acceleration lane — extend by 1,180 -ft (1,680 req'd, 500 existing) 00 Turning radii should be capable of serving a WB -67 design vehicle. This will require some median improvements. Given these improvements, the Powers Batch Plant will not have major negative impacts on transportation services or facilities. See also attached Traffic Exhibits: • • (1) Traffic Impact Study called" LaFarge West Cerise Site" by Eugene G. Coppola, PE, PTOE (dated 8.4.10) TurnKey Consulting Memorandum called "Powers Batch Plant - Traffic Impact Assessment on Adjacent Roads" Preparation and coordination of Garfield County Driveway Access Permit [SE] Applicant Response: Sopris Engineering has prepared an application for the Garfield County Driveway Access Permit that is attached as an Exhibit to this document. It will be submitted 30 days before the access is to be constructed (2) Preparation and coordination of CDOT Access Permit [SE and SH] Applicant Response: See attached draft documents showing the proposed CDOT Access Permit Application Package for the connection of CR -103 to SH -82 attached as a Traffic Exhibit. Nuisance. Impacts on adjacent land from generation of vapor, dust, smoke, noise, glare or vibration, or other emanations. [TLS and Lafarge] 121 Crystal Ranch Corp Concrete Batch Plant Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Major Impact Review Section 12 - Impact Analysis (4-502(E)) Applicant Response: Lafarge currently meets the standards for air, glare, radiation or fumes which substantially interfere with the existing use of adjoining property or which constitutes a public nuisance or hazard. Included, you will find the following management plans attached as Exhibits that address these issues: Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan prepared by Lafarge West, Inc. Stormwater Management Plan prepared by Lafarge North America Certification for the Colorado Wastewater Discharge Permit System issued by the CDPH&E Construction Permit issued by the CDPH&E Air Pollution Control Division Cerise Mine Air Quality Statement prepared by Lafarge West, Inc. Analysis of Noise from Proposed Cerise Gravel Mine prepared by Hankard Environmental, Inc. Lafarge has numerous permits and regulations that limit and prevent nuisance impacts on neighboring properties. Lafarge has been operating a Ready Mix plant on the Powers site for more than 10 years with no violations. Reclamation Plan. A reclamation plan consistent with the standards in Section 7-212. [SE] Applicant Response: Please refer to Sopris Engineering's sheet IA -2 for this information. 122 Contractors Storage Yard Application 12015 4-203.L. Traffic Letter (attached) 151 Page 12/23/2014 POWERS PIT SMALL CONTRACTOR'S YARD TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYISIS-ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW APPLICATION SMALL CONTRACTOR'S YARD AREA 90% OF LEASABLE AREA AVT /1000 SQ FEET NET RENTABLE AREA ON A WEEKDAY* AVT /1000 SQ FEET NET RENTABLE AREA ON A WEEKDAY (AM PEAK)* AVT /1000 SQ FEET NET RENTABLE AREA ON A WEEKDAY (PM PEAK)* AVT /ACRE NET RENTABLE AREA ON A WEEKDAY* AVT /ACRE FEET NET RENTABLE AREA ON A WEEKDAY (AM PEAK)* AVT /ACRE FEET NET RENTABLE AREA ON A WEEKDAY (PM PEAK)* TOTAL LEASABLE AREA (SF) 217800 196,020 323 35 43 843 TOTAL LEASABLE AREA (ACRES) 5.000 4.500 159 18 18 NOTES: *AVERAGE RATE WAS USED TO CALCULATE TRIPS FROM THE 9TH EDITION OF THE ITE MAXIMUM CALCULATED TRIPS GENERATED BY SMALL CONTRACTORS YARD TO BE ADDED TO BATCH PLANT TRIP GENERATION AND COMPARED TO RURAL EMPLOYMENT CENTER TRIP GENERATION BELOW BATCH PLANT PER MAY 3,2011 MEMO FROM TURN KEY CONSULTING, LLC RANGE OF PEAK HOUR TRIPS VPH PEAK PERIOD IN OUT TOTAL AM 33 12 45 PM 10 33 43 + 35=80 COMPARE TO RURAL EMPLOYMENT CENTER RANGE OF PROJECT TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY BELOW + 43=86 — COMPARE TO RURAL EMPLOYMENT CENTER RANGE OF PROJECT TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY BELOW RURAL EMPLOYMENT CENTER -RANGE OF PROJECT TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY PER "TRAFFIC ASSESSMENT FOR POWERS RURAL EMPLOYMENT CENTER", PREPARED BY TURNKEY CONSLUTING, LLC DATED MAY 3, 2011 RANGE OF PEAK HOUR TRIPS ITE LAND USE CODE PEAK -HOUR PERIOD TOTAL PEAK HOUR TRIP ENDS LOWEST INDUSTRIAL PARK (LUC 130) AM 165 PM 170 HIGHEST PARK & RIDE LOT W/BUS SERVICE (LUC 090) AM 939 PM 843 > 80 >86 >80 >86 CDOT ACCESS PERMIT ALLOWS FOR 190 DHV: ADDITIONAL TRIPS GENERATED BY DEVELOPING 5 ACRES OF THE PIT FLOOR IN ADDITION TO THE CURRENT BATCH PLAN USE, DOES NOT EXCEED THE PERMITTED TRIPS. SUMMARY: ESTIMATED TRAFFIC GENERATED BY SMALL CONTRACTORS YARD ALONG WITH ESTIMATED TRAFFIC GENERATED BY BATCH PLANT I5 SUBSTANTIALLY LESS THAT THAT WHICH WAS ESTIMATED FOR THE BUILD OUT OF THE RURAL EMPLOYMENT CENTER, THEREFORE, DEVELOPMENT OF A 5 -ACRE PORTION OF THE POWERS PIT INTO A SMALL CONTRACTOR'S YARD IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE CDOT AND COUNTY PERMITS AND NOT FURTHER PERMITTING IS REUIRED. Sopris Engineering • LLC civil consultants 502 Main Street • Suite A3 • Carbondale, CO 81623 • (970) 704-0311 • Fax (970) 704-0313 Q:\14\14196\TRAFFIC\14196-TRAFFIC ANALYSIS.xlsx SE JOB # 14196 Contractors Storage Yard Application 12015 4-2O3.M. Water Supply/Distribution Plan No full time employees will be located at this site as all leasing and customer service functions will be located at the ALL VALLEY STORAGE facility, located at 0082 CR 113, Carbondale. It is anticipated that our manager will be checking on this site several times a week to review site conditions and meet with customers to ensure they move into the correct space. These site visits are likely to be under an hour in duration. ALL VALLEY STORAGE will also be implementing video security as the site grows and matures beyond the initial stages. It will be the responsibility of our employee to have bottled water with them in their vehicles. 4-2O3.N. Wastewater Treatment Plan As described in section 4-203.M. this site will not have a full time employee on site. ALL VALLEY STORAGE will be providing a maintained porta-john for our staff as well as for customers as needed. As with our own staff, customers trips will be intermittent and will not last for long durations as they will be dropping off, or picking up goods and materials. 161 Page Contractors Storage Yard Application 12015 Will Serve Letter (attached) 171 Page Will Serve Letter Crystal River Corp- Contractor Storage Yard Application . InterMountain WA.c-` a nF_C,CLY',1C- P 0 Box 3336 3927 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 January 19, 2015 Ms. Tamra Allen Garfield County Building and Planning Department 108 8th Street, Suite 201 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 RE: Crystal Ranch Corp Administrative Review- 5 Acre Contractors Storage Yard Dear Ms. Allen, This letter is to certify that Intermountain Waste & Recycling will serve the property located at 013114 HWY 82, Carbondale, CO 81623 for waste disposal and/or portable restrooms. The Customer is subject to all standard terms and conditions. Sincerely, \ ata_ Scott Eden Co -President Intermountain Waste & Recycling Contractors Storage Yard Application 12015 Section 7, Divisions 1,2,3 and 7-2001 (attached) 181 Page Article 7- Garfield County ULUC 7-101. ZONE DISTRICT USE REGULATIONS. The Land Use Change shall comply with Article 3, Zoning, including any applicable zone district use restrictions and regulations. [The land use complies with Article 3 as illustrated in Table 3-403, Small contractors yards are allowable with Administrative approval. This site was also incorporated as a Rural Employment Center as part of it's 2011 SUP approvals. 7-102. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENTS. The Land Use Change is in general conformance with the Garfield County Comprehensive Plan and complies with any applicable intergovernmental agreement. [The land use is in general conformance with the Garfield County Comprehensive Plan and complies with any applicable intergovernmental agreement, particularly the 2011 Special Use Permit and Comprehensive Plan Amendment that identifies this property as a Rural Employment Center.] 7-103. COMPATIBILITY. The nature, scale, and intensity of the proposed use are compatible with adjacent land uses. [The nature, scale and intensity of the proposed small contractors yard is compatible with the adjacent land uses as well as contemplated future uses for this property] 7-104. SOURCE OF WATER. All applications for Land Use Change Permits shall have an adequate, reliable, physical, long- term, and legal water supply to serve the use, except for land uses that do not require water, or that contain Temporary Facilities served by a licensed water hauler. [Historically, much of the Powers Ranch was flood irrigated using water rights in the Kelly Ditch and the Kelly Wastewater Ditch, which water rights divert from Crystal Spring. Water has also been provided to the gravel pit from water diverted from the Roaring Fork River through the Kelso Ditch to James Reservoir for industrial and irrigation uses. This water is pumped below highway 82 for these industrial and irrigation uses. The historically irrigated lands have now largely been mined and are ready for revegetation. The Kelso Ditch is also decreed to provide supplemental irrigation to the same gravel pit acreage that was historically irrigated under the Kelly Ditch. The Roaring Fork Sand and Gravel pit has been operating since the mid -1960's. The primary industrial water supply has been from James Reservoir that is providing water from the Kelso and Martin Ditches. These industrial uses from the Reservoir and ditches were confirmed and augmented pursuant to the decree entered on February 6, 1995 in Case No. 92CW304. That decree also confirmed that these rights could be used for irrigation uses upon the Powers Ranch. James Reservoir has a surface area of 1.38 acres and a capacity of 8.28 acre-feet. It is located in the southwest corner of Lot 11, Section 26, Township 7 South, Range 88 West, 6th P.M. The Martin and Kelso Ditches are decreed for 3 cfs for industrial and irrigation uses. Article 7- Garfield County ULUC This demonstrates adequate water, however; This application does not require the use of water.] 7-105. CENTRAL WATER DISTRIBUTION AND WASTEWATER SYSTEMS. [This application will not require water or wastewater distribution systems. Because of intermittent use, the Applicant is not proposing to provide potable water (though irrigation is available throughout the site), and wastewater may be managed through the placement and regular servicing of a porta-john.] 7-106. PUBLIC UTILITIES. [The only anticipated utilities required for this yard will be power/electricity to operate gates, security systems and minor lighting. This application will not require any additional public utilities to operate] 7-107. ACCESS AND ROADWAYS. All roads shall be designed to provide for adequate and safe access and shall be reviewed by the County Engineer. [This small contractors yard application will utilize the improved entrance (per the 2011 SUP approval) to this portion of the crystal lower property and will not negatively impact transportation services and facilities as use will be intermittent. The site will not have any full time employees as operations will be run from the main All Valley Storage site located at Cattle Creek/CR 113. The current design does conform with the Standards of the Garfield County Land use code. Meeting all there requirements include lane width, no ditch (due to adequate drainage), cross slope (follow the design of the pit floor grading), and there is no right of way.] 7-108. USE OF LAND SUBJECT TO NATURAL HAZARDS. Land subject to identified Natural and Geologic Hazards, such as falling rock, landslides, snow slides, mud flows, radiation, flooding, or high water tables, shall not be developed unless it has been designed to eliminate or mitigate the potential effects of hazardous site conditions as designed by a qualified professional engineer and as approved by the County. [Geology and hazards have been delineated by CTL/Thompson's project geologist and are attached as an Exhibit. CTL/Thompson's Summary of Conclusions is as follows: 1. No geologic or geotechnical conditions were identified which would preclude the planned development of this site. Collapse -prone soils outside of the pit area and potential for sink hole formation related to Eagle Valley Evaporite are the primary geologic concerns. 2. The subsurface conditions encountered in our exploratory pits generally were manplaced fill consisting of aggregate base course and crusher fines underlain by cleanto slightly silty gravel to the maximum explored depth of 12 feet. Four feet of sandy clay -silt was encountered in the bottom of our exploratory pit TP -2. 3. We did not encounter ground water in our exploratory pits at the time of exploratory excavation operations. Our exploratory pits were backfilled immediately after exploratory excavation operations were completed. Article 7- Garfield County ULUC 4. We anticipate footing or slab foundations will be appropriate for buildings constructed at the site. 5. Asphalt or asphalt with aggregate base course are suitable for access roads and parking lots. Details are presented in this report. Also refer to the Engineering Report prepared by Sopris Engineering dated 6-24-11 for additional information.] 7-109. FIRE PROTECTION. A. Adequate Fire Protection. Adequate fire protection will be provided for each land use change as required by the appropriate fire protection district. [This application will not require fire protection.] 7-201. AGRICULTURAL LANDS. [This application shall not adversely affect or otherwise limit the viability of existing agricultural operations and no agricultural lands shall be disturbed. This application is located on a reclaimed portion of the existing site and is not adjacent to existing agricultural lands] 7-202. WILDLIFE HABITAT AREAS. [The wildlife use patterns associated with the existing concrete batch plant and surrounding property have been in place long term at this site. The area surrounding this site was recently revegitated as part of the 2011 and earlier approvals.] 7-203. PROTECTION OF WATERBODIES. [There are no wetlands or waterbodies that will be disturbed by activities associated with the Small contractors yard at the Crystal Ranch Corp Property.] 7-204 DRAINAGE AND EROSION. Please refer to Sopris Engineering's sheet ES1 for demonstration of compliance with the erosion and sedimentation standards in Section 7-205. The Drainage Study is also attached which views the entire pit floor as mostly impervious and thus the pond was designed and developed to service this use as well as the remainder of uses 7-205. ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY. A. Air Quality. Any Land Use Change shall not cause air quality to be reduced below acceptable levels established by the Colorado Air Pollution Control Division. [This application shall not cause air quality to be reduced] 3I Article 7- Garfield County ULUC B. Water Quality. At a minimum, all hazardous materials shall be stored and used in compliance with applicable State and Federal hazardous materials regulations. [All hazardous materials shall be stored and used in compliance with applicable State and Federal hazardous materials regulations. ] 7-206. WILDFIRE HAZARDS. The following standards apply to areas subject to wildfire hazards as identified on the County Wildfire Susceptibility Index Map as indicated in the County's Community Wildfire Protection Plan. A. Location Restrictions. Development associated with the land use change shall not be located in any area designated as a severe wildfire Hazard Area with Slopes greater than 30% or within a fire chimney as identified by the Colorado State Forest Service. [This application does not occur in a location designated as a severe Wildfire Hazard Area] B. Development Does Not Increase Potential Hazard. The proposed Land Use Change shall be developed in a manner that does not increase the potential intensity or duration of a wildfire, or adversely affect wildfire behavior or fuel composition. [The proposed application is developed in a manner that does not increase the potential intensity or duration of a wildfire, or adversely affect wildfire behavior or fuel composition. Leases shall contain provisions regarding the storage of potentially flammable materials ] C. Roof Materials and Design. Roof materials shall be made of noncombustible materials or other materials as recommended by the local fire agency. . [This application contains no structures] 7-207. NATURAL AND GEOLOGIC HAZARDS. A. Utilities. Above -ground utility facilities located in Hazard Areas shall be protected by barriers or diversion techniques approved by a qualified professional engineer. The determination to locate utility facilities above ground shall be based upon the recommendation and requirements of the utility service provider and approved by the County. B. Development in Avalanche Hazard Areas. Development may be permitted to occur in Avalanche Hazard Areas if the development complies with the following minimum requirements and standards, as certified by a qualified professional engineer, or qualified professional geologist, and the plan approved by the County. [Geology and hazards have been delineated by CTL/Thompson's project geologist and are attached as an Exhibit. CTL/Thompson's Summary of Conclusions is as follows: 1. No geologic or geotechnical conditions were identified which would preclude the 4 Article 7- Garfield County ULUC planned development of this site. Collapse -prone soils outside of the pit area and potential for sink hole formation related to Eagle Valley Evaporite are the primary geologic concerns. 2. The subsurface conditions encountered in our exploratory pits generally were manplaced fill consisting of aggregate base course and crusher fines underlain by clean to slightly silty gravel to the maximum explored depth of 12 feet. Four feet of sandy clay -silt was encountered in the bottom of our exploratory pit TP -2. 3. We did not encounter ground water in our exploratory pits at the time of exploratory excavation operations. Our exploratory pits were backfilled immediately after exploratory excavation operations were completed. 4. We anticipate footing or slab foundations will be appropriate for buildings constructed at the site. 5. Asphalt or asphalt with aggregate base course are suitable for access roads and parking lots. Details are presented in this report.] 7-208. RECLAMATION [Upon expiration of the business activities associated with this application all land shall be returned to it's natural state and materials and fencing removed as outlined in section 7-208 of the land use code] [Upon completion of business activities, the site shall be returned to the reclaimed state is currently in, this consists of the removal of any stored items, fences and any lighting/security devices.] 7-301. COMPATIBLE DESIGN. The design of development associated with the land use change shall be compatible with the existing character of adjacent uses. [A. Site Organization: The layout and location of this application is consistent and compatible with existing character of the adjacent uses. The site is organized in a manner that allows traffic to flow unobstructed to the site from C.R. 103 and allows for parking on-site so as not to create on -street parking. B. Operational Characteristics: The site location is designed to mitigate dust, odors, fumes and glare that could be objectionable to adjacent properties. Noise shall conform to all State and County noise regulations. Hours of operation are contemplated to be 6am to 8pm in order to minimize traffic during peak demand on highway 82. C. Buffering: The site is located in a corner of the site that has berms on two sides, while the remaining two sides are visible only from the property and County Road 103 for a brief moment. Fencing will be installed on all four sides to provide buffering as well as security. D. Materials: There are no permanent structures associated with this application. The applicant may utilize and offer containers for future protected/dry storage to customers] 7-302. OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING STANDARDS. A. Off -Street Parking Required. 5I Article 7- Garfield County ULUC [For customers that are visiting the site, ample parking will be available outside of their individual storage yards as the drive lanes will be designed as such, no on -street parking will be required as this site sits within a 23 acre open space.] 7-303. LANDSCAPING STANDARDS. Accessory dwelling units, Industrial Uses and all uses located fully within a parcel of land in an Industrial Zone District are exempt from this section. [This application is exempt from this standard] 7-304. LIGHTING STANDARDS. Any exterior lighting shall meet the following conditions: A. Downcast Lighting. Exterior lighting shall be designed so that light is directed inward, towards the interior of the Subdivision or site. [This application shall comply with the standards set forth in article 7-304] 7-305. SNOW STORAGE STANDARDS. All residential uses except for multi -family are exempt from this section, unless the residential use includes a common outdoor parking area. [The applicant shall allow for the storage of snow as required in section 7-305. This site sits within a 23 acre open space, which will allow for ample space to store snow. Drainage is addressed in the Sopris Engineering drainage plan.] 7-306. TRAIL AND WALKWAY STANDARDS. A. Recreational and Community Facility Access. A multi -modal connection, such as a trail or sidewalk, shall be provided in a development where links to schools, shopping areas, parks, trails, greenbelts, and other public facilities are feasible. [This site is not linked or within proximity to trails, sidewalks or other public amenities.] 6 Article 7- Garfield County ULUC 7-1001. INDUSTRIAL USE. These standards shall apply to all industrial uses: A. Residential Subdivisions. Industrial uses shall not occupy a lot in a platted residential Subdivision. [This application does not occupy a lot in a platted residential Subdivision] B. Setbacks. All activity associated with these uses shall be a minimum of 100 feet from an adjacent residential property line, unless the use is on an industrially zoned property. [This application satisfies the 100' setback minimum] C. Concealing and Screening. When an industrial use is not located on an industrial zoned property, all storage, Fabrication, service, and repair operations shall be conducted within an enclosed building or have adequate provisions, based on location and topography, to conceal and screen the facility and/or operations from adjacent property(s). [The topography and location of this site will conceal this facility from Highway 82 and surrounding properties. ] D. Storing. 1. Materials shall be stored on the property in a form or manner that will not be transferred off the property by any reasonably foreseeable natural cause or force. 2. All products shall be stored in compliance with all national, State, and local codes. 3. Shall be a minimum of 100 feet from an adjacent property line. 4. Petroleum and hazardous products shall be stored in an impervious spill containment area(s). [This application shall conform with all items identified in this section and as illustrated in a sample lease agreement, which is attached as an exhibit.] E. Industrial Wastes. All industrial wastes shall be disposed of in a manner consistent with Federal and State statutes and requirements of CDPHE. Flammable or explosive solids or gases and other hazardous materials including wastes shall be stored according to the manufacturer's standards and shall comply with the national, State, and local fire codes and written recommendations from the appropriate local fire protection district. [This application shall conform with all items identified in this section and as illustrated in a sample lease agreement, which is attached as an exhibit.] F. Noise. Noise shall not exceed State noise standards pursuant to C.R.S., Article 12, Title 25, unless the use is regulated by the COGCC. In this case, the use shall be subject to COGCC rules in regard to noise abatement. [This application shall conform with all noise standards listed and as illustrated in a sample lease agreement, which is attached as an exhibit.] G. Ground Vibration. Every use shall be operated so that the ground vibration inherently and recurrently generated is not perceptible without instruments at any point of any boundary line of the property. [This application shall conform with all ground vibration standards listed and as illustrated in a sample lease agreement, which is attached as an exhibit.] H. Hours of Operation. Any activity that will generate noise, odors, or glare beyond the property boundaries will be 7I Article 7- Garfield County ULUC conducted between the hours of 7:00 a.m .to 7:00 p.m. Monday through Saturday, or as approved by the decision-making authority. [This application requests the hours of operation to occur between 6am and 8pm Monday thru Saturday.] I. Interference, Nuisance, or Hazard. Every use shall be so operated that it does not emit heat, glare, radiation, or fumes that substantially interfere with the existing use of adjoining property or that constitutes a public nuisance or hazard. Flaring of gases, aircraft warning signal, and reflective painting of storage tanks, or other legal requirements for safety or air pollution control measures, shall be exempted from this provision. [This application shall conform with Interference, Nuisance or Hazard standards listed and as illustrated in a sample lease agreement, which is attached as an exhibit.] Contractors Storage Yard Application 12015 CTL THOMPSON GEOTECH REPORT (attached) 191 Page CTL ITHOMPSON MICOOPORATelli GEOLOGIC AND PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION POWERS PIT CONCRETE BATCH PLANT GARFIELD COUNTY. COLORADO Prepared For: CRYSTAL RANCH CORP. c/o Holland and Hart 600 East Main Street, Suite 104 Aspen, CO Attention: Mr. Art Daily Project No. GS05567-115 May 12, 2011 234 Center Drive 1 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Telephone: 970-945-2809 Fax: 970-945-7411 TABLE OF CONTENTS SCOPE 1 SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS 1 SITE DESCRIPTION ..........................» 2 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 2 SITE GEOLOGY AND GEOLOGIC HAZARDS ......................»..... 3 FIELD AND LABORATORY INVESTIGATIONS 6 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS... 7 Effects on Ground Water and Aquifer Recharge Areas 8 Natural Clay -Silt 8 Gravel 8 DEVELOPMENT RECOMMENDATIONS 9 Site Grading 9 Imported Fill 10 Permanent Cut and Fill Slopes 10 Utility Construction 10 PRELIMINARY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR STRUCTURES 12 Foundations 12 Slab -on -Grade and Basement Floor Construction 12 Below -Grade Construction 13 Surface Drainage 13 General Design Considerations 14 CONCRETE .................. 14 FINAL DESIGN CONSULTATION AND CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATIONS 15 GEOTECHNICAL RISK 16 LIMITATIONS 16 FIGURE 1 —LOCATIONS OF EXPLORATORY PITS FIGURE 2 —SUMMARY LOGS OF EXPLORATORY PITS FIGURE 3 — CONCEPTUAL LAND USE PLAN FIGURES 4 AND 5 -- GRADATION TESTING RESULTS TABLE I — SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TESTING APPENDIX A — GUIDELINE SITE GRADING SPECIFICATIONS CRYSTAL RANCH CORP. POWERS PIT CONCRETE BATCH PLANT PROJECT NO. GS05567-115 5•1G$0.5567 .000111512 ReporraGS05507 '115 R1 dot SCOPE This report presents the results of our Geologic and Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation for the Powers Pit Concrete Batch Plant in Garfield County, Colorado. The purpose of our investigation was to identify geologic hazards that may exist at the site and evaluate the subsurface conditions to assist in planning and budgeting for the proposed development. We have previously performed a "Slope Stability Evaluation" for the Powers Pit. dated May 6, 2010 under our 'Project No. GS -5464-145. We performed the evaluation to assist with reclamation of the site once mining operations are complete. This report includes descriptions of site geology, our analysis of the impact of geologic conditions on site development. a description of the subsurface, ground water conditions found in our exploratory pits. and discussions of site development as influenced by geotechnical considerations. This report was prepared for the exclusive use of Crystal Ranch Corp and Holland and Hart, based upon our understanding of the development plans. The recommendations are considered preliminary and can be used as guidelines for further planning of development and design of grading. We should review final development and grading plans to determine where additional investigations are merited. or if we need to revise our recommendations provided in this report. Additional investigations will be required to design building foundations. A summary of our findings and recommendations is presented below. More detailed discussions of the data, analysis and recommendations are presented in the report. SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS 1. No geologic or geotechnical conditions were identified which would preclude the planned development of this site. Collapse -prone soils outside of the pit area and potential for sink hole formation related to Eagle Valley Evaporite are the primary geologic concerns. 2. The subsurface conditions encountered in our exploratory pits generally were man -placed fill consisting of aggregate base course and crusher fines underlain by clean to slightly silty gravel to the maximum CRYSTAL RANCH CORP. POWERS PIT CONCRETE BATCH PLANT PROJECT NO. GS05567-115 S"1GS415567Matti SV. Repan;tGSQSSE7 iiS R1.dat 1 explored depth of 12 feet. Four feet of sandy clay -silt was encountered in the bottom of our exploratory pit TP -2. We did not encounter ground water in our exploratory pits at the time of exploratory excavation operations. Our exploratory pits were backfilled immediately after exploratory excavation operations were completed, 4. We anticipate footing or slab foundations will be appropriate for buildings constructed at the site. 5. Asphalt or asphalt with aggregate base course are suitable for access roads and parking lots. Details are presented in this report. SITE DESCRIPTION The site is located approximately 1.5 mites east of the intersection of State Highway 82 and State Highway 133 in Garfield County. Colorado. The approximately 24 acre site consists of a Lafarge gravel pit and concrete batch plant. Several areas of the pit floor have been used for disposal of waste concrete. State Highway 82 borders the site on the south, and Crystal Springs Road borders the site on the east. The parcel is surrounded by rural ranches and single-family residences. Ground surfaces on the floor of the pit are relatively flat, sloping down to the south at grades less than 5 percent. Steeper slopes (some vertical cuts) surround the pit. Areas of the Powers Pit were currently being mined. Vegetation at the site consisted of sparse weeds and grasses. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT We understand that potential development of the parcel could consist of commercial and light industrial Tots (including the continued operations of the concrete batch plant) with paved parking. roads and underground utilities (as shown on Figure 3). Below -grade construction associated with these uses will likely be one - level. if chosen. Preliminary plans indicate site grading will consist of construction of access roads, utilities and some building pads. CRYSTAL RANCH CORP. POWERS PIT CONCRETE BATCH PLANT PROJECT NO, GS05567-115 5:1GS05567:0000152. ReportsiG50s5r,7 115 R 1,dne 2 SITE GEOLOGY AND GEOLOGIC HAZARDS Site geology and geologic hazards on this parcel were evaluated by David A. Glater, P.E., C.P.G., using field reconnaissance on April 28, 2011 and a review of available literature. The ground surface at the time of our visit was clear of snow. Literature references are cited at the end of this section. We did not observe bedrock outcrops within the pit. If present at the pit bottom, it has been covered by mining operations. Outcrops were noted in road cuts along Crystal Springs Road, just northeast of the property. Mapping by the Colorado Geological Survey (2008, Reference 2) indicates bedrock materials beneath the Powers Pit are the Pennsylvanian age Eagle Valley Evaporite (Pee), a sedimentary deposit that comprises gypsum, anhydrite, limestone carbonate and shale. The bedrock in this area is highly folded and faulted due to tectonic forces and dissolution by ground water over hundreds of millions of years. An excerpt from CGS' 2008 geologic map is reproduced below 2008 CGS Geologic Map — Scale: Distance between section lines is about 1 mile or 5280 feet. CRYSTAL RANCH CORP. POWERS PIT CONCRETE BATCH PLANT PROJECT NO. GS05567-115 S:1GS05567.000111512. Rnports1GS05567 115 R1.doc 3 Bedrock materials are covered by Glacial Terminal Moraine deposits (Qtrn). The glacial material was deposited during recession of the middle to late Pleistocene ice sheets in this area, probably 500.000 to 1 million years ago. The moraine is a gravelly cobble -boulder soil with a clayey sand matrix. The gravel pit processes the moraine deposit, estimated to be about 30 feet thick or more. Geologically recent alluvium - colluvium (Qaco) and slopewash-colluvium (Qcs) up to about 25 feet thick covers the moraine deposit and is the overburden" for the mine. The alluvium-colluviunn is more granular and is exposed in un -mined areas in the southern portion of the pit. The slopewash is finer -grained. described as a pinkish -brown silty and sandy clay. Geologic hazards typical in Colorado are described in Reference 3. Brief reconnaissance found no evidence of avalanches, landslides. rockfalls, mudflows and debris fans, expansive soil and bedrock on the Powers Pit property. Portions of the pit are being actively rained. Some areas expose nearly vertical slopes within the silty and sandy clay overburden and the cobble -gravel mine zone. These over- steepened slopes are potentially unstable. Reclamation was underway in the east portion of the pit. Slopes were being graded at inclinations of about 3H:1 V or flatter, as shown on the reclamation plan. Where engineered, reclaimed slopes are present or planned; we believe they will be stable, provided hydrostatic pressure is not allowed to build within them. Collapsible soil deposits are not expected inside the Powers Pit where the overburden has been removed for mining and replaced during reclamation. Some of the undisturbed soils around the pit may have some degree of collapse potential upon wetting. This should be investigated if improvements are planned outside the pit. The regional geologic hazard of sinkholes due to ground subsidence caused by widespread dissolution of salt in the bedrock may affect the property. CGS mapped two instances of sinkhole formation nearby on Crystal Springs Road, shown as X's on the geologic map. We were not able to see the evidence of sinkhole activity mapped by CGS. We believe the likelihood of sinkhole formation is smaller in the CRYSTAL RANCH CORP. POWERS PIT CONCRETE BATCH PLANT PROJECT NO. GS05567-115 5:1G305557.0 0 011 1 512 Rvporls1G505557R115 131.doc 4 mined pit than the surrounding area along Crystal Spring, because of the historically persistent drainage and the recently removed loading of 10's of feet of soil. A proper way to evaluate the presence of subsidence features such as filled or open voids is to perform targeted deep drilling where critical structures will be located. The soil and bedrock units are not expected to respond unusually to seismic activity. Liquifaction potential is considered nil. We believe most locations on the pit bottom can be considered to be Site Class C. Sites outside the pit will likely be Site Class D. Only minor damage to relatively new, properly designed and built structures would be expected. On April 27. 2011. our project engineer. Mr. Edward R. "Ted" White. visited the site and performed a radiation survey. Our survey consisted of walking along lines the length of the site in an east -west direction. Lines were spaced approximately 30 to 50 feet apart. We observed radiation measurements that were taken with a Ludlum Instruments, Inc. Model No. 19 Micro -R -Meter carried at arms length (approximately 2 feet above the ground surface). Radiation readings were observed by continuously glancing back and forth from the Micro -R -Meter to the line of travel. We observed radiation measurements averaging approximately 2 microroentgens per hour. Some areas had readings as low as 0 microroentgens per hour and as high as 5 microroentgens per hour. In our opinion, these readings on the site are indicative of normal background radiation for the area in Garfield County near the pit and do not indicate contamination. Excavations at individual sites will expose the subsoils and could yield different radiation readings. It may be appropriate to perform a radiation survey of completed excavations at individual locations on the property. In summary. we find no geologic hazards that preclude development of this parcel for the planned uses. CRYSTAL RANCH CORP. POWERS PIT CONCRETE BATCH PLANT PROJECT NO.0555567-115 S71GS06567.000)11542. ReckonlIGS055.67 115 Ri.doc 5 Geology Section References "Surficial Geology. Geomorphology, and General Engineering Geology of Parts of the Colorado River Valley. Roaring Fork River Valley, and Adjacent Areas. Garfield County. Colorado" by J.M. Soule and B.K. Stover, Colorado Geologic Survey Open File Report 85-1, Plate 1A - Surficial Geologic Map. Plate 2A - Geomorphic Features Map. Plate 3A — Geologic Hazards Map. and Plate 4A — Construction - Materials Map. 1985 2. "Geologic Map of the Carbondale Quadrangle, Garfield County, Colorado" compiled by Robert M. Kirkham and Beth L. Widmann. Colorado Geological Survey Map Series 36, 2008 3. "Guidelines and Criteria for Identification and Land -Use Controls of Geologic Hazard and Mineral Resource Areas" by W.P. Rogers. et. al, Special Publication 6. Colorado Geologic Survey. 1974 4. Aerial Photography by Google Earth. Date believed to be several years ago. prior to construction of facilities south of the earth -filled ponds. 5. "Collapsible Soils and Evaporite Karst Hazards Map of the Roaring Fork River Corridor. Garfield, Eagle. and Pitkin Counties, Colorado" by Jonathan L. White. Colorado Geological Survey Map Series 34, 2002. FIELD AND LABORATORY INVESTIGATIONS Subsurface conditions were investigated by observing the excavation of seven exploratory pits at the approximate locations shown on Figure 1. The pits were excavated using a trackhoe. Our Laboratory/field manager observed exploratory excavation operations, logged the soils found in the pits and obtained samples. Summary logs of the soils found in the pits are presented on Figure 2. Sarnples recovered from the exploratory pits were returned to our laboratory and visually classified by the geotechnical engineer. Laboratory testing included Atterberg limits. particle -size analysis, and water soluble sulfate content. Laboratory test results are presented on Figures 4 and 5 and summarized on Table I. CRYSTAL RANCH CORP. POWERS PIT CONCRETE BATCH PLANT PROJECT NO. GS05567.115 S:VG5o5567.000111522. ReparlslGS95567 115 R1.doc 6 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Subsurface conditions found in our exploratory pits TP -1. TP -3 and TP -4 were approximately 2 feet of aggregate base course underlain by natural sandy gravel with cobbles and boulders. At the TP -5 and TP -6 locations our exploratory pits penetrated natural gravels from the ground surface to the maximum excavation depth. Three feet of crusher fine (sand and fine gravel) were underlain by natural gravel in TP -7. At the TP -2 location we found 2 feet of aggregate course above 6 feet of granular fill underlain by the natural gravels. We encountered an approximately 9 foot layer of waste concrete on the south edge of our pit TP -5. A more detailed description of the subsurface conditions is presented in our exploratory pit logs and laboratory testing. Ground water was not encountered in our exploratory pits at the time of exploratory drilling operations. Ground water levels on the parcel are likely related to the Roaring Fork River and are nearest the ground surface during peak snowmeltirunoff. during April and May. We do not anticipate that ground water will significantly affect future development of the site. We reviewed the National Cooperative Soil Survey prepared by the United States Department of Agriculture (U.S.D.A.) The Soil Conservation Service (SCS) classifies the soils on the site as Almy loam with slopes of 1 to 12 percent, and Fluvaquents with slopes of 0 to 10 percent. The SCS indicates that sites with these soils may be very limited (poor) to not limited (excellent) for development of dwellings with or without basements. lawns and landscaping, local roads and streets, slopes, and small commercial buildings due to problems related to shrink/swell or low soil strength. The SCS indicates that corrosion of concrete is low and corrosion potential of steel may be high. Based on our site specific field and laboratory investigation, we believe mitigation may be required; however. the site is not considered "poor" for development. Adjacent developments have generally performed well. CRYSTAL RANCH CORP. POWERS PIT CONCRETE BATCH PLANT PROJECT NO. OS05567.115 S: Sa5567.Obi7Vt1S Z. Reparts1GSD5567 115 Ri.doc 7 Effects on Ground Water and Aquifer Recharge Areas The nearest major floodplain to the Powers Pit Concrete Plant is the Roaring Fork River floodplain. approximately 1/4 mile to the south. Proposed uses of the site do not include waste disposal. CTL I Thompson. Inc. has previously provided a slope stability analysis for the Powers Pit under our Project No. GS05464-145. dated May 6. 2010. Natural Clay -Silt We encountered sandy clay -silt in the bottom 4 feet of our pit TP -2 near the south portion of the Powers Pit. Conceptual plans show this area will consist of a landscaped buffer and berm. These soils will not adversely affect landscape buffer or berm construction. Our observations during excavation operations indicated the sandy clay -silt was stiff. Atterberg limits testing on the clay were a liquid limit of 26 percent and a plasticity index of 5 percent. The clay -silt contained 85 percent silt and clay size particles (passing the No. 200 sieve). Laboratory test results are summarized on Table I. Gravel Sandy gravel with cobbles and boulders was encountered at the surface or below aggregate base course and crusher fine fill in our pits across the majority of the Powers Pit. Conceptual plans show that the future development at the site will occur in areas where the natural gravel with cobbles will be present at anticipated foundation elevations. Four samples of the gravel tested contained between 3 and 7 percent silt and clay size particles (passing the No. 200 sieve). The laboratory testing does not include larger diameter soils such as cobble and boulder and therefore is reflective of the finer sized portions of the actual soils. Gradation test results are shown ori Figures 4 and 5. CRYSTAL RANCH CORP. POWERS PIT CONCRETE BATCH PLANT PROJECT -NO. GS05567-115 5i1GS05567,0004115%2 Reports1G505567 115 Ri.doc 8 DEVELOPMENT RECOMMENDATIONS Site Grading Grading plans are being developed at this time. Based on the conceptual plans, we anticipate that site grading will be limited to that required to foram Tots and construct roads and utilities across the site. We believe grading can be accomplished using conventional construction techniques and heavy-duty equipment. It is important that deep fills (if planned) be constructed as far in advance of surface construction as possible. it is our experience that fill compacted in accordance with the compaction recommendations in this report may settle about 0.5 to 1 percent of its thickness under its own weight. Most of this settlement usually occurs during and soon after construction. Some additional settlement is possible after development and landscape irrigation increases soil moisture content. We recommend delaying the construction of buildings underlain by deep fills as long as possible to allow for this settlement to occur, Delaying construction of structures up to one year where located on deep fills is recommended. The existing on-site soils are suitable for re -use as fill material provided the soils are free of particles larger than 6 inches in diameter„ debris or deleterious organic materials. Prior to fill placement, all trash and debris should be removed from fill areas and properly disposed. The ground surface in areas to be filled should be stripped of vegetation, topsoil and other deleterious materials, scarified to a depth of at least 8 inches, moisture conditioned and compacted as recommended below. Topsoil is non-existent in most areas of the site. The depth of topsoil is not anticipated to be more than 4 to 8 inches thick where topsoil is present. CRYSTAL RANCH CORP. POWERS PtT CONCRETE BATCH PLANT PROJECT NO. GS05567-115 S:tG505567.00041151.2 Reperrts1G505567 115 R1.doc 9 Site grading fill should be placed in thin, loose lifts, moisture conditioned and compacted. In areas of deep fill. we recommend higher compaction criteria to help reduce settlement of the fill. Compaction and moisture requirements are presented in Appendix A. The placement and compaction of fill should be observed and density tested during construction. Guideline site grading specifications are presented in Appendix A. Imported Fill If import material is required for fill, samples from each source should be provided for our review. Import structural fill should consist of a CDOT Class 6 aggregate base course or similar soil. The material should be placed and compacted as recommended in Appendix A. Permanent Cut and Fill Slopes We performed a slope stability evaluation for the Powers Pit under our Project No. GS05464-145, dated May 6. 2010. Recommendations form our evaluation should be followed for permanent cutlfill slopes. Utility Construction We believe excavations for utility installation in the soils at the site can be performed with conventional heavy-duty or large backhoes. Ground water is not anticipated in excavations at the site. If ground water is encountered during construction in shallow excavations, dewatering will likely be feasibly accomplished by sloping excavations to occasional sumps where water can be removed by pumping. CRYSTAL RANCH CORP. POWERS PFT CONCRETE BATCH PLANT PROJECT NO, GS05567•115 S:4GSa55G1.aaD111612. RnportsIGS05557 115 R1.dat 10 Utility trenches should be sloped or shored to meet local. State and federal safety regulations. The gravel will classify as a Type C soil based on OSHA standards. The clay will classify as a Type B soil based on OSHA standards. Excavation slopes specified by OSHA are dependent upon soil types and ground water conditions encountered. Contractors should identify the soils encountered in the excavation and refer to OSHA standards to determine appropriate slopes. Excavations deeper than 20 feet should be designed by a professional engineer. The width of the top of an excavation may be limited in some areas. We believe "trench box" construction may be necessary. Bracing systems would need to penetrate the cobble and boulder. Sheet pile installation would likely be problematic, Lateral loads on bracing depend on the depth of excavation.. slope of excavation above the bracing, surface Toads, hydrostatic pressures, and allowable movement. For trench boxes and bracing allowed to move enough to mobilize the strength of the soils with associated cracking of the ground surface. the -active" earth pressure conditions are appropriate for design. If movement is not tolerable. the "at rest" earth pressures are appropriate. We suggest an equivalent fluid density of 35 pcf for the `'active" earth pressure condition and 50 pcf for the "at rest" earth pressure condition. assuming level backfill. These pressures do not include allowances for surcharge loading or for hydrostatic conditions. We are available to assist further with bracing design, if desired. Water and sewer lines are usually constructed beneath paved roads. Compaction of trench backfill can have a significant effect on the life and serviceability of pavements. Trench backfill should be placed in thin. loose lifts, and moisture conditioned to within 2 percent of optimum content. Trench backfill should be compacted to at least 95 percent of maximum dry density (ASTM D 698). The placement and compaction of fill and backfill should be observed and tested by our firm during construction. Backfill soils maximum diameter should be limited to 3 inches to avoid nesting of larger diameter rock in the trench. CRYSTAL RANCH CORP. POWERS PfT CONCRETE BATCH PLANT PROJECT NO. GS451%7-115 S:4G555557A001.11542. ReportmkGS115557 115 RS.dva 1 'f PRELIMINARY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR STRUCTURES The property is currently planned for industrial or commercial construction. Our field and laboratory data indicate the soil conditions across the site generally consist of clean to slightly silty gravel with cobbles. The following discussions are preliminary and are not intended for design or construction. After grading is completed. a detailed geotechnical investigation should be performed for each structure and lot. Foundations Our geologic and preliminary geotechnical investigation for this site indicates structures can likely be founded on shallow foundations where gravel soils occur at foundation elevations. Shallow foundation types will likely include footings, mat/rafts. or post -tensioned slabs -on -grade for Tight structural loads. A design level geotechnical investigation may identify potential constraints for specific areas not indicated by our pits. Slab -on -Grade and Basement Floor Construction The use of slabs -on -grade for main -level and basement floors will likely be appropriate. We believe most of the site will be rated low risk for poor slab performance. Excavations into the natural soils will likely expose cobble and boulders. A leveling course of crusher fines or similar soil will likely be needed to achieve a fiat surface to place concrete slabs on. Slab performance risk should be more thoroughly defined during the design -level geotechnical investigation. Buildings with mat -raft or post -tensioned slab -on -grade foundations will not require an independent slab -on -grade floor because the foundations will also be the slab. CRYSTAL RANCH CORP. POWERS PIT CONCRETE BATCH PLANT PROJECT NO.OS05567.115 53G50556i. 0811512. ReponsMGS05567 115 Rtdoc 12 Below -Grade Construction Surface water should not flow adjacent to foundation walls and below slabs. To reduce the risk of excess moisture and hydrostatic pressure developing on foundation walls, foundation drains may be necessary around below -grade areas. Foundation drains should discharge to sumps where water can be removed by pumping or by gravity. Foundation walls and grade beams should be designed to withstand lateral earth pressures. The design pressure should be established during design -level geotechnical investigations. Surface Drainage Proper surface drainage is critical to the performance of foundations and flatwork. The ground surface around proposed buildings should be shaped to provide runoff of surface water away from the structure and off of pavements. We generally recommend slopes of at feast 12 inches in the first 10 feet where practical in the landscaping areas surrounding buildings. There are practical limitations on achieving these slopes. Irrigation should be minimized to control wetting. Roof downspouts should discharge beyond the limits of backfill. Water should not be allowed to pond on or adjacent to pavements. Proper control of surface runoff is also important to Iimitthe erosion of surface soils. Sheet flow should riot be directed over unprotected slopes. Water should not be allowed to pond at the crest of slopes. Permanent slopes should be re -vegetated to reduce erosion. Water can follow poorly compacted fill behind curb and gutter and in utility trenches. This water can soften fill and undermine the performance of the roadways, flatwork and foundations. We recommend cornpactive effort be used in placement of all fill. CRYSTAL RANCH CORP. POWERS PIT CONCRETE BATCH PLANT PROJECT NO, GS45567.115 S:1GSD5557.000i115i2. Ropor1i GS05567115 R1.dac 13 General Design Considerations Exterior sidewalks and pavements supported by the gravel soil are subject to post construction movement. Flat grades should be avoided to prevent possible ponding. particularly next to buildings due to soil movement. Positive grades away from the buildings should be used for sidewalks and flatwork around the perimeter of the buildings in order to reduce the possibility of movement of this flatwork. resulting in ponding next to the structures. Joints next to buildings should be thoroughly sealed to prevent the infiltration of surface water. Where concrete pavement is used, joints should also be sealed to reduce the infiltration of water. Since some post construction movement of pavement and flatwork may occur. joints around the buildings should be periodically observed and resealed where necessary. Roof drains should be discharged well away from the structures, preferably by closed pipe systems. Where roof drains are allowed to discharge on concrete flatwork or pavement areas next to the structures, care should be taken to insure the area is as water tight as practical to eliminate the infiltration of this water next to the buildings. CONCRETE Concrete that comes into contact with soils can be subject to sulfate attack. A concentration was measured in a sample of the natural gravel at the site at 0.00 percent For this level of sulfate concentration, ACI 318-0 Code Requirements for Structural Concrete indicates there are no special requirements for sulfate resistance. In our experience, superficial damage may occur to the exposed surfaces of highly permeable concrete, even though sulfate levels are relatively low. To control this risk and to resist freeze -thaw deterioration, the water-to-cementitious materials CRYSTAL RANCH CORP. POWERS PfT CONCRETE BATCH PLANT PROJECT NO, GSO5567.115 S: tGS05557.000i11512, INpurtsIGS(15557 115 R1.doc 14 ratio shouldnot exceed 0.50 for concrete in contact with soils that are likely to stay moist due to surface drainage or high water tables. Concrete should have a total air content of 6%+1-1.5%a. We recommend damp -proofing of all concrete walls in contact with soils. including buried grade beams, to control moisture penetration into the concrete. FINAL DESIGN CONSULTATION AND CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATIONS This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Crystal Ranch Corp and Holland and Hart to provide geologic and geotechnical criteria for due diligence and preliminary planning of the project. The information and the conclusions and recommendations presented herein are based upon the considerations of many factors including, but not limited to. the type of development proposed, the configuration of the development. the geologic setting. and the subsurface conditions encountered. The conclusions and recommendations contained in the report are not valid for use by others. CTL Thompson, Inc. should be retained to provide design -level geotechnical investigations for the project when plans are further developed. Our firm should also be retained to provide geotechnical engineering and material testing during construction of the site grading, utilities, and drainage features. The purpose is to observe the construction with respect to the geotechnical design concepts, specifications or recommendations, and to facilitate design changes in areas where the subsurface conditions differ from those anticipated before the start of construction. Based on the results of this investigation and the proposed development, we recommend the following investigations be performed: 1 Review of final site grading plans by our firm; CRYSTAL RANCH CORP. POWERS PIT CONCRETE BATCH PLANT PROJECT NO. G5E5567-115 S:1G505567.000%115V2 Reporks{G55055G7 S15 Rtdnc 15 2. Design -level geotechnical investigations to determine appropriate foundation and floor systems for structures after grading: and Construction testing and observation for site development and building construction. GEOTECHNICAL RISK The concept of risk is an important aspect of any geotechnical evaluation. The primary reason for this is that the analytical methods used to develop geotechnical recommendations do not comprise an exact science. The analytical tools which geotechnical engineers use are generally empirical and must be tempered by engineering judgment and experience. Therefore. the solutions or recommendations presented in any geotechnical evaluation should not be considered risk-free arid. more importantly, are not a guarantee that the interaction between the soils and the proposed structure will perform as desired or intended. What the engineering recommendations presented in the preceding sections do constitute is our estimate, based on the information generated during this and previous evaluations and our experience in working with these conditions, of those measures that are necessary to help the development perform satisfactorily. The developer, builder, and future owners must understand this concept of risk, as it is they who must decide what is an acceptable level of risk for the proposed development of the site. LIMITATIONS Our exploratory pits were located to obtain preliminary subsurface data indicative of conditions on this site. Although our pits were spaced to obtain a reasonably accurate picture of subsurface conditions, variations in the subsoils riot indicated in our pits are always possible. We believe this investigation was conducted in a manner consistent with that level of skill and care ordinarily used by members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions in the locality of this project. No warranty. express or implied, is made. CRYSTAL RANCH CORP. POWERS PIT CONCRETE BATCH PLANT PROJECT NO. GS05567.115 S: GS055£7,1100111612. Rep] rlsGS05567 115 RI.ttnc 16 This report was prepared from data developed during our field exploration, laboratory testing, engineering analysis and experience with similar conditions. The recommendations contained in this report were based upon our understanding of the planned construction. If plans change or differ from the assumptions presented herein, we should be contacted to review our recommendations. If we can be of further service in discussing the contents of this report or in the analysis of the building and pavement from the geotechnical point of view, please call. CTL 1 TH Edward Project En Reviewed b lir1, P.E. h Manager Reviewed by: cbat7iLck� . co David A. Glater, P.E., C.P.G. Principal Geologic Engineer ERW:JM:DAG:cd cc: Via email to iandstudio2(ccomcast.net CRYSTAL RANCH CORP. POWERS PIT CONCRETE HATCH PLANT PROJECT NO. GS05567-115 S:iG505567.000'411512. Repnrts1G565567 116 R1,dQ 17 o O L �o " 0 W a. g cm 3 t1/./.a L Zrsasa I a r a r Depth In Feet IIIIIIIIII1IIII1 In o u� c,C9C3oa�DOUdU�C� IVa V , 0 O O aC] oU oa oQ Q oQ oQ o o o =�o a ==o ��o moo �=o o �=o �oo 0;Ci ooQdad°Ct)C.o . n C55Q o a a=o..o o.00 a000 o�oo o��o o.00 �aoQOoQOa°Q aQao� I=R 000<l\\\\\ vow ..0..0 ..0 ..0 ..0 O n O u) 11111111111111111 }aaj ul y}dad 0 z 0 s _c_ v o co E ov � a ocE 0o OzaoO o C ON 0 o O o C"` O GL „ o a 'O ®N 30 oc ,R • 0 0 3 -- 2.-..,E0 `oz o:° it = c a 3 a o n O a o o des 013 D O + c o ao c 0 O a% o C poE o CL 0'-c O X 0 0 EV OXQ 0Ea ox7 O 0 w O> 'r- O O o o—t h O a O o o oa` O o 0 a W 0 Z.- O J i 0 r O sandy, stiff, moist, brown. M J x U v N H d' c 0o c o o� 0 o 0 0 0 ay ac 0 v o O > n 1 .8 co EOe_ 0 a ® El Asphalt pavement. Crusher fines — sand, fine gravel. Indicates bulk sample. Aggregate base course. 0 .0 a 0 0 A 0 .0 0 0. 0 'O C 0 n 0 0 EE a� 0 fZ E SUMMARY LOGS OF EXPLORATORY PITS Project No. GS05567-115 Contractors Storage Yard Application 12015 Sopris Engineering Report (attached) 201 Page ENGINEERING REPORT FOR POWERS PIT CONCRETE BATCH PLANT COMP PLAN AMENDMENT Garfield County, Colorado Stephanie 0. Helfenbein E.I. Prepared by: Sopris Engineering, LLC 502 Main Street Suite A3 Carbondale, Colorado 81623 SE Project Number: 11016 June 24, 2011 77 $ f 2,04:0* 1u tl Ce Yaricy Nichol, P.E. Engineering Report— Powers Pit Concrete Batch Plant - SE Project No. 11016.01 June 24, 2011 Page 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION & PURPOSE 3 2.0 POTABLE WATER SYSTEM 2.1 Existing Potable Water System 3 2.2 Proposed Potable Water System 3-4 2.3 Water Demand 4 2.4 Fire Protection 4 3.0 SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM 3.1 Existing Sanitary Sewer System 5 3.2 Proposed Sanitary Sewer System 5 4.0 IRRIGATION SYSTEM 5 5.0 SHALLOW UTILITIES 5-6 6.0 NATURAL HAZARDS 6 7.0 ACCESS 6 8.0 ROADS/SITE IMPROVEMENTS 6 9.0 TRAFFIC 6 10.0 DRAINAGE 7 11.0 CONCLUSIONS 7 502 Main Street • Suite A3 • Carbondale, CO 81623 • (970) 704-0311 • Fax (970) 704-0313 SOPRIS ENGINEERING • LLC civilconsultants Engineering Report— Powers Pit Concrete Batch Plant - SE Project No, 11016.01 _ June 24, 2011 Page 3 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE This report presents our summary of engineering analysis and findings associated with the proposed Powers Pit Concrete Batch Plant Comp Plan Amendment and accompanies drawings prepared by Sopris Engineering (SE) dated June 24, 2011. The Powers Pit is located north east of Carbondale, Colorado, on the north side of State Highway 82 in Garfield County, Colorado. The entire property consists of approximately 453 acres. Of that area, approximately 68.5 acres is currently leased to LaFarge for mining and batch plant operations while the remaining property is developed as rural residential. The developable portion of the currently leased area will consist of approximately 19.25 acres exclusive of the roadway, detention pond and slopes. This report and this amendment do not apply to the rural residential or agricultural portion of the property. Because the final developed uses of this project are not determined at this time, SE made some assumptions on what can/will be developed based on Garfield County Code Requirements. There is approximately 19.25 acres of usable area outside of the roadway, detention pond and slopes. • Per Garfield County Code (3-206), lot coverage is limited to 75% which equates to 14.44 acres (629,006 SF). • Per Garfield County Code (3-304-A), parking space requirements are 1 space/2000 SF for "Wholesale Establishment, Warehouse, Rail or Truck Freight Terminals". • Assumed area of a parking space including required access roads=400 SF Balancing the required parking, snow storage and allowable building square footages: -Approximate Potential Future Allowed Building SF=572,297 SF - Approximate Potential Future required parking spaces=286 - Approximate Potential Future area of parking spaces=51,507 SF - Approximate Potential Future required snow storage at 2.5% of parking surface=1,288 SF - Approximate Potential Future TOTAL lot coverage (Building + Parking) 623,804 SF < 75% Allowed The various site engineering studies summarized in this report are intended to provide an evaluation and assessment of infrastructure needs associated with the proposed subject development. Engineering summaries and findings addressing utilities, natural hazards, access, drainage, and roads are included. 2.0 POTABLE WATER SYSTEM 2.1 EXISTING POTABLE WATER SYSTEM Currently, the La Farge gravel pit site does not have a domestic water source. 2.2 PROPOSED POTABLE WATER SYSTEM The proposed development will be served by a domestic well that has recently been drilled in the southeast corner of the pit floor. The system will be designed to provide a reliable water supply adequate to meet fire flow requirements and in-house needs of the development. A storage tank will be constructed to allow storage and treatment of the water prior to distribution. Once the uses of the Rural Employment Center are determined, the potable tank will be designed to provide 2 days of storage for the entire development, plus 180,000 gallons (1,500 gallons per minute X 2 hours) to 502 Main Street • Suite A3 • Carbondale, CO 81623 • (970) 704-0311 • Fax (970) 704-0313 SOPRIS ENCINEERING • LLC civil consultants Engineering Report— Powers Pit Concrete Batch Plant - SE Project No. 11016.01 June 24, 2011 Page 4 provide the required fire flows of 1,500 gallons/min. The anticipated water uses are primarily potable water and fire protection. No potable water will be used for irrigation. 2.3 WATER DEMAND Water demand represents the total water usage required within a distribution system. As is stated above, the anticipated water uses are primarily potable water and fire protection. No potable water will be used for irrigation. The Average Day Demand (ADD) calculated below represents the total annualized water use on a daily basis. It forms a basis for estimating Peak Day Demand (PDD) and Peak Hour Demand (PHD). The PDD us used in establishing the required water production capacity and represents the daily use during peak periods. Water production and treatment capacity should, at a minimum, equal the PDD. The PDD was estimated based upon peak factor ratios applied to the ADD. These peak factors generally differ by uses types since they are most often include both indoor and outdoor water use. As a result, peak factors are normally substantially influenced by irrigation demand and in this case, irrigation is provided by a raw water system. Water demand can be calculated in a variety of ways. Garfield County uses a system which translates residential and commercial uses into Equivalent Residential Units or EQRs, where 1 EQR=300 gallons per day/household. Garfield County does not allow a reduction in water demand or peaking factors as a result of using a raw water system to supply irrigation water. As there is no Garfield County EQR schedule, this development was analyzed using the West Glenwood Sanitation District's "Non -Retail Work Area Such as Garages, Machine Shops, Fire Stations and Warehouses" with 0.2 EQR/1000 SF. Utilizing the assumptions outlined in the Introduction above for potential buildout of the project, ADD for the project is estimated at 34,200 gallons per day with the PDD estimated at 85,500gallons per day, as is outlined in the table below, with no reductions being applied for utilizing raw water for irrigation. Maximum Building (SF) EQRs (0.2/1000 SF) ADD (gpd) Peak Day Factor PDD (gpd) 572,297 114 34,200 2.5 85,500 2.4 FIRE PROTECTION The LaFarge pit is located within the Carbondale Rural Fire Protection District. The County has adopted the Uniform Fire Code of the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), and all aspects of the PUD's design will need to meet this code. All PUD lots are required to have primary and secondary access points to allow escape from fire entrapment. Buildings constructed within the PUD will need to meet the requirements of Appendix B of the International Fire Code (IFC), "Fire Flow Requirements for Buildings." All roads within the subdivision will need to be designed and constructed to Garfield County standards to ensure unrestricted access to the District's emergency vehicles. Since the PUD will not be served by Carbondale's public water system, a fire protection storage tank will be required, per NFPA Standard 1142, "Standard on Water Supplies for Suburban and Rural Fire Fighting." The tank will be supplied by a well and will be sized designed to provide 2 days of storage for the entire development, plus 180,000 gallons (1,500 gallons per minute X 2 hours) to provide the required fire flows of 1,500 gallons/min. We estimate that the largest required tank would be in the range of 240,000 gallons. 3.0 SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM 502 Main Street • Suite A3 • Carbondale, CO 81623 • (970) 704-0311 • Fax (970) 704-0313 SOPRIS ENGINEERING • LLC civil consultants Engineering Report— Powers Pit Concrete Batch Plant - SE Project No, 11016.01 June 24, 2011 Page 5 3.1 EXISTING SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM Currently, the LaFarge gravel pit does not have an existing sanitary sewer system. The on-site buildings are served by a port -a -potty. 3.2 PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM The most viable option for serving the wastewater needs of the future Rural Employment Center is the use of individual onsite wastewater treatment systems (OWTS) for each property developed. A county -permitted OWTS will be required for future Rural Employment Center uses to be developed. The design of these individual treatment systems will be based on on-site geotechnical characteristics, organic loading, and proposed peak wastewater flows. Setbacks from on-site wells, irrigation ditches, dwellings, and property lines are required for each system. As part of the OWTS design, a site-specific geotechnical evaluation is required by a qualified geotechnical engineer. Maximum wastewater flow per day for an OWTS is 2,000 gallons/day for 2 acres which limits this development to approximately 20,000 gallons/day (ADD) or 67 EQRs. Using a peaking factor of 2.5, the projected peak day demand will be 50,000 gallons/day. Therefore, development of this property is limited by the capacity of the OWTS systems, limiting developed square footage to approximately 336,350 SF (572,297 SF/114 EQR=5020 SF/EQR). Based on preliminary site geotechnical information, any OWTS constructed in this area will require an active secondary treatment system for treatment of the primary effluent from the lot's septic tank. A secondary treatment system would consist of a pressure dosed dispersal field or a treatment/absorption field with imported filter sand and synthetic media. These secondary treatment systems will be sized to allow for infiltration of treated effluent into the ground based on site soil permeability. Accordingly, future lots will need to be sized sufficiently to accommodate required setbacks from each OWTS. 4.0 IRRIGATION SYSTEM The site currently receives raw water from the Roaring Fork River for process and irrigation uses. The gravel pit's water rights, which are owned by Crystal Ranch Corp and leased to Lafarge, are decreed for irrigation and industrial uses associated with the operations of the gravel pit. The existing infrastructure and easements that are in place for transporting the river water to the gravel pit are also owned by Crystal Ranch Corp and leased to Lafarge. Currently, the water is pumped and routed to the gravel pit by means of a pump station located on the south side of Highway 82 and 10 -inch and 4 -inch pipelines that cross below the highway. 5.0 SHALLOW UTILITIES Providers of electrical, natural gas, telephone and cable TV services were contacted regarding providing utility service to the site: Electric Electrical service is currently provided to the LaFarge gravel pit by Holy Cross Energy. Existing overhead power lines onsite provide three-phase electrical power to the machinery on site. Holy Cross Energy reports that the existing lines have adequate capacity to serve a new development. The power lines will be able to service both three-phase and single phase electrical equipment. 502 Main Street • Suite A3 • Carbondale, CO 81623 • (970) 704-0311 • Fax (970) 704-0313 SOPRIS ENGINEERING • LLC civilconsultants Engineering Report— Powers Pit Concrete Batch Plant - SE Project No. 11016.01 June 24, 2011 Page 6 Gas Source Gas reports that natural gas is not currently provided to the site, and the closest point of connection to their system is a high-pressure main located 900 feet east of the site along Highway 82, therefore at this time, providing gas to the future development is cost prohibitive and will not be supplied. Telephone Telephone service is currently to the LaFarge gravel pit by Qwest Communications. Currently, there are two telephone service terminals/pedestals located along the south property boundary/Highway 82 right-of-way. Qwest reports that the telephone cable that connects to these terminals has adequate capacity to serve a new development at the site. Cable Comcast reports that cable TV is not currently provided to the site, and therefore will not be supplied to the development. 6.0 NATURAL HAZARDS The proposed site appears not to have any natural hazards (ie. rockfall or wildfire) located on or near the site that might affect the site. Please refer to the Soils Study prepared by CTL Thompson for further information. 7.0 ACCESS As part of the lease termination agreement between Powers Ranch and LaFarge current access from Highway 82 will be discontinued, and a new access road into the property will be constructed from County Road 103. The proposed access road has been designed and an access permit application has been prepared and will be submitted to Garfield County concurrently with this amendment. The road's intersection with the County Road is designed to begin approximately 275 feet north of Highway 82, which will allow for adequate space for staging of vehicles between the PUD entrance and the highway. The proposed PUD access road will form a tee intersection with County Road 103, with one lane for vehicles entering the PUD and dedicated right and left turn lanes for vehicles exiting the PUD. The road has been designed as a 24 -foot wide asphalt road with 2 -foot gravel shoulders and drainage borrow ditches on both sides of the road. We propose that the existing access to the pit from Highway 82 be utilized as an Emergency access only. 8.0 ROADS/SITE IMPROVEMENTS. All access ways throughout the parking areas are designed to be 24 -feet wide with 2 -foot wide gravel shoulders which is in compliance with Garfield County Standards for a rural/secondary access. 9.0 TRAFFIC Please refer to Traffic Impact Analysis for this information. 10.0 DRAINAGE Please refer to the Powers Pit Concrete Batch Plant Comp Plan Amendment Drainage Study prepared by Sopris 502 Main Street • Suite A3 • Carbondale, CO 81623 • (970) 704-0311 • Fax (970) 704-0313 SOPRIS ENGINEERING • LLC civil consultants Engineering Report— Powers Pit Concrete Batch Plant - SE Project No. 11016.01 June 24, 2011 Page 7 Engineering, dated June 24, 2011 for additional information pertaining to drainage and stormwater mitigation for this proposed development. 11.0 CONCLUSION The goal of this report and accompanying engineering drawings is to meet Garfield County's requirements for a comp plan amendment. Through this preliminary design process the following has been determined: 1) The development can be served by all required utilities. 2) Water service required for domestic service and fire suppression capabilities will be provided to all proposed structures on the property. 3) Buildout of this project is limited by the capacity of the wastewater infrastructure. Although, per code, as is outlined in the introduction, the actual developable square footage of the property allows for approximately 572,297 square feet of building, the capacity of the OWTS systems will limit the buildout to approximately 336,350 SF. Sopris Engineering can be contacted for any questions and needed clarifications. 502 Main Street • Suite A3 • Carbondale, CO 81623 • (970) 704-0311 • Fax (970) 704-0313 SOPRIS ENGINEERING • LLC civil consultants DRAINAGE STUDY FOR POWERS PIT CONCRETE BATCH PLANT COMP PLAN AMENDMENT Garfield County, Colorado Prepared by: Sopris Engineering, LLC 502 Main Street Suite A3 Carbondale, Colorado 81623 SE Project Number:11016 June 24, 2011 Step anie 0. Helfenbein E.I Yancy Nichol, P.E. Master Drainage Study— Powers Pit Concrete Batch Plant - SE Project No, 11016 Page2 June 24, 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION & PURPOSE 3 2.0 DESIGN POINTS 3 3.0 EXISTING DRAINAGE CONDITION AND FEATURES 3.1 Onsite Drainage 3-4 3.2 Offsite Drainage 4 3.3 Existing Basin Descriptions 4 4.0 DEVELOPED DRAINAGE CONDITION AND FEATURES 4.1 Developed Sites 4-5 4.2 Stormwater Detention 5-6 5.0 ANALYSIS METHODS AND ASSUMPTIONS 5.1 Rainfall 6 5.2 Time of Concentration... 6 5.3 Runoff Curve Number 6 6.0 DRAINAGE FACILITY MAINTENANCE 6 7.0 SUMMARY 6 ATTACHMENTS Exhibit 1 Exhibit 2 Appendix A Pre Development Drainage Basins Post Development Drainage Plan/Basins Supporting documentation and calculations. 502 Main Street • Suite A3 • Carbondale, CO 81623 • (970) 704-0311 • Fax (970) 704-0313 SOPRIS ENGINEERING •LLC civil consultants Master Drainage Study— Powers Pit Concrete Batch Plant - SE Project No. 11016 Page3 June 24, 2011 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE The Powers Pit is located north east of Carbondale, Colorado, on the north side of State Highway 82 in Garfield County, Colorado. The entire property consists of approximately 453 acres. Of that area, approximately 68.5 acres is currently leased to LaFarge for mining and batch plant operations while the remaining property is developed as rural residential. The purpose of the drainage study is: • To identify the existing drainage flows and patterns to and across the subject site. • To estimate stormwater runoff rates that may be expected through the additional development of the project. To determine the volume of stormwater detention that will be necessary to maintain the existing peak runoff and stormwater volume of the project and provide a safe routing of stormwater to the detention or retention areas. • To comply with the drainage standards for the Garfield County Unified Land Use Resolution of 2008 Section 7-206. Sopris Engineering, LLC (SE) has analyzed the project's impacts and has designed drainage detention structures to detain the entire 100 -year storm. The appendices located in the back of this report contain all supporting calculations associated with this analysis. 2.0 DESIGN POINTS The existing site has two "'release" points, which SE is referring to as Design Points (DP). The DPs are used to describe both the existing and developed drainage conditions. The developed site has been designed to not release any stormwater as the terrain prohibits the release of any stormwater. The design points and the existing and developed basins associated with them are further described below. DESIGN POINT 1 -DPI is located at the western portion of the leased site. The existing basin which contributes to the flows at this DP is Ex -Basin 1. When developed, P -Basin 1 will flow to this DP. With development, there are no changes to this basin. DESIGN POINT 2-DP2 is located at the existing detention pond. The existing basin which contributes flows at this DP is Ex -Basin 2. When developed, P -Basins 2-5 will contribute flows to this DP. Since the site has been mined and reclaimed, the site does not have a real "release" point for the majority of the leased site as the grades are much lower than Highway 82, water cannot physically leave the site. 3.0 EXISTING DRAINAGE CONDITION AND FEATURES 3.1 Onsite Drainage The site consists of 62.16 acres. The site has recently been reclaimed with slopes on the west, north and east of 3:1 and gentle slopes southwest across the floor of 1-3%. A 210,000 CF detention pond exists in the western portion of the site which collects all on site drainage. 502 Main Street • Suite A3 • Carbondale, CO 81623 • (970) 704-0311 • Fax (970) 704-0313 SOPRIS ENGINEERING • LLC civil consultants Master Drainage Study- Powers Pit Concrete Batch Plant - SE Project No. 11016 Page4 June 24, 2011 3.2 Offsite Drainage Since the site has been reclaimed, no offsite drainage enters the site. It is intercepted by irrigation ditches on the northern portion of the project site. 3.3 Existing Basin Description There are two existing drainage basins, 1 and 2 and they are shown on Exhibit 1: Existing Drainage Basins. The two drainage basins contribute to two different design points which correlate with the developed drainage basins design points. The design points associated with the existing basins are further described below: DESIGN POINT1: Existing Basin 1 contributes flows to DP1. EX Basin 1 is the westernmost drainage and contains 2.0 acres. This basin contributes to Design Point 1. The runoff from this basin flows into HWY 82 right-of-way drainage. DESIGN POINT2: Existing Basin 2 contributes flows to DP2. ➢ EX Basin 2 is the remainder of the project site and consists of 6055 acres. This basin contributes to Design Point 2. The runoff from this basin flows into an existing swale around the perimeter of the floor and west into an existing detention pond. TABLE A: EXISTING DRAINAGE SUMMARY BASIN ID DESIGN POINT AREA (acres) WEIGHTED CN TIME OF CONCENTRATION (min) EX 25 YEAR PEAK RUNOFF (cfs) EX 100 YR PEAK RUNOFF (cfs) EX 1 DP1 2 69 10 0.56 1.05 TOTAL DP 1 0.56 1.05 EX 2 DP2 60.55 72 24.19 17.41 29.86 TOTAL DP2 17.41 29.86 Refer to Appendix A for a summary of existing drainage basin calculations. 4.0 DEVELOPED DRAINAGE CONDITION AND FEATURES 4.1 Developed Site The proposed drainage concept for the entire project includes planned drainage facilities to manage stormwater runoff from the site. A combination of drainage swales and a storm drain network is proposed to route runoff from the roadways, parking areas and building roofs to one detention area. Runoff from the paved areas will drain to drainage swales which drain to the detention area in the western portion of the site. Curve numbers were assigned to each basin based on the anticipated developed land use, being conservative and assuming that the entire floor, exclusive of the drainage swales and detention pond, will be impervious. The minimum time of concentration for the developed sub basins was assumed to be 10 minutes. The developed site is designed to detain the entire 100 - year, 24-hour storm as the water cannot physically leave the site. Refer to Exhibit -2: Post Development Drainage Plan for a map that illustrates the delineation of each of these developed sub- basins. A total of 5 drainage basins from development occur and contribute to one of the two design points. To simplify the description of the developed basins, the descriptions are per design point, each of which includes several proposed basins. The developed basins and design points are shown on Exhibit 2 and are further described below. 502 Main Street • Suite A3 • Carbondale, CO 81623 • (970) 704-0311 • Fax (970) 704-0313 SOPRIS ENGINEERING • LLC civil consultants Master Drainage Study- Powers Pit Concrete Batch Plant - SE Project No. 11016 Pages ,lune 24, 2011 DESIGN POINT 1: Developed Basin 1 contributes flows to this design point. Developed Basin 1 is the westernmost drainage and contains 2 acres. There is no proposed development within this basin, therefore no detention is proposed within this basin and no storm infrastructure is proposed within the basin. It will continue to flow to the drainage facilities within Hwy 82. DESIGN POINT 2: Developed Basin 2-5 contribute flows to this design point. Developed Basins 2-5 encompass the remainder of the project site and consist of a total of 60.55 acres. We have assumed that the entire floor, exclusive of the drainage swales and detention pond, will be impervious as we do not have a development plan at this time. We have not proposed any stormwater infrastructure at this time and instead, propose that any confined drainage will infiltrate. However, the detention pond on the western portion of the project site has been designed to, at some point, accept and detain all on-site drainage. Table B summarizes the developed onsite sub basin data and calculations for the 25 and 100 -year storm events. Appendix A contains supporting calculations for the developed on site basins. TABLE B: DEVELOPED DRAINAGE SUMMARY BASIN ID DESIGN POINT AREA (acres) WEIGHTED CN TIME OF CONCENTRATION (min) POST 25 YEAR PEAK RUNOFF (cfs) POST 100 YR PEAK RUNOFF (cfs) P1 DP1 2 69 0:10:00 0.56 1.05 TOTAL DP1 0.56 1.05 P2 DP2 43.62 77 0:22:01 23.08 34.21 P3 DP2 6.9 86 0:10:00 9.67 12.75 P4 DP3 9.73 84 0:10:00 11.57 15.71 P5 DP4 0.3 98 0:10:00 0.73 0.87 TOTAL DP2 45.05 63.54 4.2 Stormwater Detention Garfield County requires that the rate of runoff from the developed site shall not exceed the pre -development runoff rate of runoff for the 25-eyear storm event. However, as is noted in section 4.1 above, due to the existing terrain, water cannot physically leave the site, it has therefore been designed to detain the entire 100 -year storm. The peak runoffs for the existing and developed storms were compared using the SCS hydrograph method to determine the required storage volume. Using the StormNet program, a required volume for the developed drainage sub areas was calculated and was used to size the proposed detention pond to ensure that the existing 210,000 CF detention pond is sufficient. As is mentioned above, the site was designed based upon two design points, which are the existing "release" points of the site. Only one of the two design points, design point 2, is required to have detention associated with it. A summary of the required detention volume for design point 2 and the attenuated peak flow leaving the site is included in Table C below. 502 Main Street • Suite A3 • Carbondale, CO 81623 • (970) 704-0311 • Fax (970) 704-0313 SOPRIS ENGINEERING • LLC civil consultants Master Drainage Study— Powers Pit Concrete Batch Plant - SE Project No. 11016 Page6 June 24, 2011 TABLE C: REQUIRED STORMWATER DETENTION SUMMARY DESIGN POINT # POND # EX BASINS EX 100 YEAR PEAK RUNOFF (cfs) DEVELOPED BASINS POST 100 YEAR PEAK RUNOFF (cfs) Q out (cfs) REQUIRED STORAGE VOLUME (CF) PROVIDED STORAGE VOLUME (CF) POND DEPTH (FT) 2 1 2 29.86 2-5 63.54 0 206,000 210,000.00 12 5.0 ANALYSIS METHODS AND ASSUMPTIONS The peak runoff rates for the basins were analyzed for the 25 year and the 100 year storm using the Soil Conservation Service (SCS) TR -55 method. All calculations and analysis were accomplished using StormNet software. 5.1 Rainfall As stated above, the SCS Type II Distribution is applicable to this region. Two design storms were utilized: 25- year/24 —hour and the 100-year/24-hour storms. Precipitation data for the site was taken from the NOAA atlas rainfall maps for Colorado. 5.2 Time of Concentration Time of Concentration calculations were performed using the TR -55 method. Hydraulic routing of sub basins was calculated using hydrodynamic link routing. A minimum time of concentration for the on-site drainage of 10 - minutes was utilized. 5.3 Runoff Curve Number Drainage basin soil information was obtained from the Natural Resource Conservation Service (MRCS) soil survey to determine the curve number. The two major determinants of the curve number (CN) are hydrologic soil group and cover type. The soils on site are classified as type "8" and type "D" while the curve numbers vary from 69 to 98, with the higher curve numbers being the least permeable. 6.0 DRAINAGE FACILITY MAINTENANCE Stormwater maintenance tasks will include checking and cleaning out culverts, inlets and outlet structures of any debris or sediment accumulation as well as maintaining any vegetation in roadside swales. The detention pond shall be monitored for any sediment loading within the ponds themselves as well as the outlet structures. Maintenance of surrounding landscaping/vegetation may also be required after major storm events. Final construction stages of work must follow a complete landscaping and ground covering task to permanently re - vegetate and cover bare grounds that will remain open space to avoid long-term soil erosion. This effort will reduce the risk of unnecessary clogging and failure of the drainage system. 7.0 SUMMARY The results from this drainage study suggest that no long-term, adverse impacts to drainage are anticipated with the development of the Powers Pit. Although onsite peak rates will increase with development, runoff from the drainage basins will drain to the detention areas and drywells via a storm drain distribution system and will be released at pre -development rates. Detention is provided for the anticipated stormwatervolume increase upon development. 502 Main Street • Suite A3 • Carbondale, CO 81623 • (970) 704-0311 • Fax (970) 704-0313 SOPRIS ENGINEERING LLC civil consultants Appendix A 11016-pre-25.txt BOSS International StormNET® - Version 4.19.3 (Build 221) **************** Analysis Options **************** Flow Units cfs Subbasin Hydrograph MethodSCS TR -55 Time of Concentration SCS TR -55 Pond Exfiltration None Starting Date MAY -11-2011 00:00:00 Ending Date MAY -I2 -201I 00:06:00 Report Time Step 00:05:00 ************* Element Count ************* Number of rain gages Number of subbasins Number of nodes Number of links 2 2 2 0 *******ow******* Raingage Summary **************** Gage ID Data Source Data Type Interval hours 100 -year 25 -year Subbasin Summary o*************** Subbasin ID 100 -YEAR 25 -YEAR Total Area acres EX -1 ************ Node Summary ************ Node ID 2.00 60.55 Element Type CUMULATIVE 0.10 CUMULATIVE 0'I0 Invert Elevation ft Maximum Elev. ft Ponded External Area Inflow ft2 Out -1 Out -2 OUTFALL OUTFALL **«*********************** Runoff Quantity Continuity ************************** Total Precipitation Surface Runoff 0.00 0.00 Volume acre -ft 11.620 0.195 Page 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Depth inches 2.229 0.037 11016-pre-25.txt Continuity Error (%) -0.000 ************************** Flow Routing Continuity ************************** volume acre -ft volume mgallons External Inflow 0.000 0.000 External Outflow 1.953 0.637 Initial Stored volume 0.000 0.000 Final Stored volume 0.000 0.000 Continuity Error (%) 0.000 ****************************************** Composite Curve Number Computations Report ****************************************** Subbasin Ex -1 Soil/Surface Description CN Area Soil (acres) Group ---- Pasture, grassland, or range, Fair 69.00 Composite Area & weighted CN 69.00 Subbasin Ex -2 Soil/Surface Description CN 2.00 B 2.00 Area Soil (acres) Group - 60.55 72.00 Composite Area & weighted CN 60.55 72.00 *************************************************** SCS TR -55 Time of Concentration Computations Report *************************************************** Sheet Flow Equation Tc = (0.007 * ((n * Lf)A0.8)) / ((PA0.5) * (sfA0.4)) where: Tc = Time of Concentration (hrs) n = Manning's Roughness Lf = Flow Length (ft) P = 2 yr, 24 hr Rainfall (inches) Sf = Slope (ft/ft) Page 2 11016-pre-25.txt Shallow Concentrated Flow Equation v = 16.1345 (SfA0.5) (unpaved surface) v = 20.3282 :; (SfA0.5) (paved surface) v = 15.0 (SfA0.5) (grassed waterway surface) v = 10.0 (SfA0.5) (nearly bare & untilled surface) v = 9.0 (SfA0.5) (cultivated straight rows surface) v = 7.0 :; (SfA0.5) (short grass pasture surface) v = 5.0 (SfA0.5) (woodland surface) v = 2.5 :; (SfA0.5) (forest w/heavy litter surface) Tc = (Lf / v) / (3600 sec/hr) where: Tc = Time of Concentration (hrs) Lf = Flow Length (ft) v = velocity (ft/sec) Sf = Slope (ft/ft) Channel Flow Equation v = (1.49 * (RA(2/3)) * (SfA0.5)) / n R = Aq / wp Tc = (Lf / v) / (3600 sec/hr) where: Tc = Time of Concentration (hrs) Lf = Flow Length (ft) R = Hydraulic Radius (ft) Aq = Flow Area (ft2) wp = wetted Perimeter (ft) v = velocity (ft/sec) Sf = Slope (ft/ft) n = Manning's Roughness Subbasin EX -1 User -Defined TOC override (minutes): 10.00 Subbasin EX -2 Sheet Flow Computations Flowpath c Manning's Roughness: 0.00 Flow Length (ft): 0.00 Slope (%): 0.00 2 yr, 24 hr Rainfall (in): 1.20 velocity (ft/sec): 0.00 Computed Flow Time (minutes): Page 3 Flowpath A 0.15 211.00 9.00 1.20 0.22 15.93 Flowpath B 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.20 0.00 0.00 11016-pre-25.txt 0.00 Shallow Concentrated Flow Computations Flowpath C Flow Length (ft): 0.00 Slope (%): 0.00 Surface Type: Unpaved velocity (ft/sec): 0.00 Computed Flow Time (minutes): 0.00 Channel Flow Computations Flowpath C Manning's Roughness: 0.00 Flow Length (ft): 0.00 Channel Slope (%): 0.00 Cross Section Area (ft2): 0.00 wetted Perimeter (ft): 0.00 velocity (ft/sec): 0.00 Computed Flow Time (minutes): 0.00 Flowpath A Flowpath B 504.00 0.00 25.00 0.00 Grass pasture Unpaved 3.50 0.00 2.40 0.00 Flowpath A 0.03 2187.00 2.00 5.00 6.00 6.22 5.86 Flowpath B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total TOC (minutes): 24.19 Subbasin Runoff Summary Subbasin Total Total Peak weighted Time of ID Precip Runoff Runoff Curve Concentration in in cfs Number days hh:mm:ss EX -1 EX -2 2.200 0.292 0.560 69.000 0 00:10:00 2.200 0.381 17.410 72.000 0 00:24:11 System 2.200 0.378 17.97 Analysis begun on: Tue Jun 28 10:11:11 2011 Analysis ended on: Tue Jun 28 10:11:14 2011 Total elapsed time: 00:00:03 Page 4 II0I6-pre-I00.txt BOSS International StnrmNET6 - Version 4.19.3 (Build 221) **************** Analysis Options **************** Flow Units cfs Subbasin Hydrograph MethodSCS TR -55 Time of Concentration SCS TR -55 Pond Exfiltration None Starting Date MAY -11-2011 00:00:00 Ending Date MAY -I2 -201I 00:06:00 Report Time Step 00:05:00 ************* Element Count ************* Number of rain gages Number of subbasins Number of nodes Number of links 2 2 2 0 *******ow******* Raingage Summary **************** Gage ID Data Source Data Type Interval hours 100 -year 25 -year ******»********* Subbasin Summary **************** Subbasin ID 100 -YEAR 25 -YEAR Total Area acres EX -1 ************ Node Summary ************ Node ID 2.00 60.55 Element Type CUMULATIVE 0.10 CUMULATIVE 0'I0 Invert Elevation ft Maximum Elev. ft Ponded External Area Inflow ft2 Out -1 Out -2 OUTFALL OUTFALL *******»****************** Runoff Quantity Continuity ****************«********* Total Precipitation Surface Runoff 0.00 0.00 Volume acre -ft 13.732 0.299 Page 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Depth inches 2.634 0.057 11016-pre-100.txt Continuity Error (%) -0.000 ************************** Flow Routing Continuity ************************** volume acre -ft volume mgallons External Inflow 0.000 0.000 External Outflow 2.989 0.974 Initial Stored volume 0.000 0.000 Final Stored volume 0.000 0.000 Continuity Error (%) 0.000 ****************************************** Composite Curve Number Computations Report ****************************************** Subbasin Ex -1 Soil/Surface Description CN Area (acres) Soil Group ---- Pasture, grassland, or range, Fair 69.00 Composite Area & weighted CN 69.00 Subbasin Ex -2 Soil/Surface Description CN 2.00 B 2.00 Area Soil (acres) Group - 60.55 72.00 Composite Area & weighted CN 60.55 72.00 *************************************************** SCS TR -55 Time of Concentration Computations Report *************************************************** Sheet Flow Equation Tc = (0.007 * ((n * Lf)A0.8)) / ((PA0.5) * (sfA0.4)) where: Tc = Time of Concentration (hrs) n = Manning's Roughness Lf = Flow Length (ft) P = 2 yr, 24 hr Rainfall (inches) Sf = Slope (ft/ft) Page 2 11016-pre-100.txt Shallow Concentrated Flow Equation v = 16.1345 (sfA0.5) (unpaved surface) v = 20.3282 :; (sfA0.5) (paved surface) v = 15.0 (sfA0.5) (grassed waterway surface) v = 10.0 (sfA0.5) (nearly bare & untilled surface) v = 9.0 (sfA0.5) (cultivated straight rows surface) v = 7.0 ;; (sfA0.5) (short grass pasture surface) v = 5.0 (sfA0.5) (woodland surface) v = 2.5 :; (sfA0.5) (forest w/heavy litter surface) Tc = (Lf / v) / (3600 sec/hr) where: Tc = Time of Concentration (hrs) Lf = Flow Length (ft) v = velocity (ft/sec) Sf = Slope (ft/ft) Channel Flow Equation v = (1.49 * (RA(2/3)) * (sfA0.5)) / n R = Aq / wp Tc = (Lf / v) / (3600 sec/hr) where: Tc = Time of Concentration (hrs) Lf = Flow Length (ft) R = Hydraulic Radius (ft) Aq = Flow Area (ft2) wp = wetted Perimeter (ft) v = velocity (ft/sec) sf = slope (ft/ft) n = Mannings Roughness Subbasin Ex -1 user -Defined TOC override (minutes): 10.00 Subbasin Ex -2 Sheet Flow Computations Flowpath c Manning's Roughness: 0.00 Flow Length (ft): 0.00 Slope (%): 0.00 2 yr, 24 hr Rainfall (in): 1.20 velocity (ft/sec): 0.00 Computed Flow Time (minutes): Page 3 Flowpath A 0.15 211.00 9.00 1.20 0.22 15.93 Flowpath B 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.20 0.00 0.00 11016-pre-100.txt 0.00 Shallow Concentrated Flow Computations Flowpath C Flow Length (ft): 0.00 Slope (%): 0.00 Surface Type: Unpaved velocity (ft/sec): 0.00 Computed Flow Time (minutes): 0.00 Channel Flow Computations Flowpath C Manning's Roughness: 0.00 Flow Length (ft): 0.00 Channel Slope (%): 0.00 Cross Section Area (ft2): 0.00 wetted Perimeter (ft): 0.00 velocity (ft/sec): 0.00 Computed Flow Time (minutes): 0.00 Flowpath A Flowpath B 504.00 0.00 25.00 0.00 Grass pasture Unpaved 3.50 0.00 2.40 0.00 Flowpath A 0.03 2187.00 2.00 5.00 6.00 6.22 5.86 Flowpath B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total TOC (minutes): 24.19 Subbasin Runoff Summary Subbasin Total Total Peak weighted Time of ID Precip Runoff Runoff Curve Concentration in in cfs Number days hh:mm:ss EX -1 EX -2 2.600 0.467 1.050 69.000 0 00:10:00 2.600 0.581 29.860 72.000 0 00:24:11 System 2.600 0.577 30.91 Analysis begun on: Tue Jun 28 10:13:24 2011 Analysis ended on: Tue Jun 28 10:13:27 2011 Total elapsed time: 00:00:03 Page 4 II0I6-pnst-25.txt BOSS International StnrmNET6 - Version 4.19.3 (Build 221) **************** Analysis Options **************** Flow Units Subbasin Hydrograph Method Time of Concentration Link Routing Method Pond Exfiltration Starting Date Ending Date Report Time Step ************* Element Count ************* Number of rain gages Number of subbasins Number of nodes Number of links cfs SCS TR -55 SCS TR -55 Hydrodynamic None MAY -II -201I 00:00:00 MAY -I2 -201I 00:06:00 00:05:00 2 5 4 3 **************** Raingage Summary **************** Gage ID Data Source Data Type Interval hours 100 -YEAR 25 -year **************** Subbasin Summary **************** Subbasin ID 100 -YEAR 25 -year Total Area acres P-1 P-2 P-3 P-4 P-5 ************ Node Summary ************ Node ID 2.00 43.62 6.90 9.73 0.30 Element Type CUMULATIVE CUMULATIVE Invert Elevation ft Maximum Elev' ft 0.10 0.10 Ponded External Area Inflow ft2 Jun -4 Out -1 Out -3 Jun -1 JUNCTION OUTFALL OUTFALL STORAGE 6179.50 6200.00 6179.00 6180.00 Page 1 6183.00 6200.00 6180.50 6186.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ************ Link Summary ************ Link Manning's ID Roughness From Node 11016-post-25.txt To Node Element Length Slope Type ft % Con -1 Jun -1 Jun -4 CONDUIT 0.0150 Con -4 Jun -4 Out -3 CONDUIT 0.0150 Reg -1 Jun -1 Jun -4 ORIFICE ********************* Cross Section Summary ********************* 135.1 4.8175 66.6 0.7512 Link Shape Depth/ width No. of Cross Full Flow Design ID Diameter Barrels Sectional Hydraulic Flow Radius ft Capacity cfs Area ft ft ft2 Con -1 0.38 Con -4 0.38 CIRCULAR 19.98 CIRCULAR 7.89 ************************** Runoff Quantity Continuity ************************** 1.50 1.50 1 1.77 1.50 1.50 1 1.77 Volume Depth acre -ft inches Total Precipitation 11.620 Surface Runoff 0.345 Continuity Error (%) -0.000 ************************** Flow Routing Continuity ************************** Volume acre -ft 2.229 0.066 Volume Mgallons External Inflow 0.000 0.000 External Outflow 3.360 1.095 Initial Stored volume 0.000 0.000 Final Stored volume 0.088 0.029 Continuity Error (%) 0.001 ****************************************** Composite Curve Number Computations Report ****************************************** Subbasin P-1 Page 2 11016-post-25.txt Soil/Surface Description CN Area (acres) Soil Group Pasture, grassland, or range, Fair 69.00 Composite Area & weighted CN 69.00 Subbasin P-2 Soil/Surface Description CN 2.00 B 2.00 Area (acres) Soil Group 98.00 69.00 Composite Area & weighted CN 77.36 Subbasin P-3 Soil/Surface Description CN 12.57 31.05 43.62 Area (acres) Soil Group 98.00 69.00 Composite Area & weighted CN 86.15 Subbasin P-4 Soil/Surface Description CN 4.08 2.82 6.90 Area (acres) Soil Group 98.00 69.00 Composite Area & weighted CN 83.57 Subbasin P-5 Page 3 4.89 4.84 9.73 Area Soil 11016-post-25.txt Soil/Surface Description (acres) Group CN - 0.30 98.00 Composite Area & weighted CN 0.30 98.00 SCS TR -55 Time of Concentration Computations Report Sheet Flow Equation Tc = (0.007 ., ((n ., Lf)A0.8)) / ((PA0.5) * (SfA0.4)) where: Tc = Time of Concentration (hrs) n = Manning's Roughness Lf = Flow Length (ft) P = 2 yr, 24 hr Rainfall (inches) Sf = Slope (ft/ft) Shallow Concentrated Flow Equation v = 16.1345 (SfA0.5) (unpaved surface) v = 20.3282 ;; (SfA0.5) (paved surface) v = 15.0 (SfA0.5) (grassed waterway surface) v = 10.0 :; (SfA0.5) (nearly bare & untilled surface) v = 9.0 (SfA0.5) (cultivated straight rows surface) v = 7.0 :; (SfA0.5) (short grass pasture surface) v = 5.0 (SfA0.5) (woodland surface) V = 2.5 :; (SfA0.5) (forest w/heavy litter surface) Tc = (Lf / v) / (3600 sec/hr) where: Tc = Time of Concentration (hrs) Lf = Flow Length (ft) v = velocity (ft/sec) Sf = Slope (ft/ft) Channel Flow Equation v = (1.49 * (RA(2/3)) (SfA0.5)) / n R = Aq / Wp Tc = (Lf / v) / (3600 sec/hr) where: Tc = Time of Concentration (hrs) Lf = Flow Length (ft) R = Hydraulic Radius (ft) Aq = Flow Area (ft2) wp = wetted Perimeter (ft) v = velocity (ft/sec) Page 4 Sf = Slope (ft/ft) n = Manning's Roughness 11016-post-25.txt Subbasin P-1 User -Defined TOC override (minutes): 10.00 Subbasin P-2 Sheet Flow Computations Subarea C Manning's Roughness: 0.00 Flow Length (ft): 0.00 Slope (%): 0.00 2 yr, 24 hr Rainfall (in): 1.20 velocity (ft/sec): 0.00 Computed Flow Time (minutes): 0.00 Shallow Concentrated Flow Computations Subarea C Flow Length (ft): 0.00 Slope (%): 0.00 Surface Type: unpaved velocity (ft/sec): 0.00 Computed Flow Time (minutes): 0.00 Channel Flow Computations Subarea C Manning's Roughness: 0.00 Flow Length (ft): 0.00 Channel slope (%): 0.00 Cross Section Area (ft2): 0.00 wetted Perimeter (ft): 0.00 velocity (ft/sec): 0.00 Computed Flow Time (minutes): 0.00 Page 5 Subarea A 0.15 211.00 9.00 1.20 0.22 15.93 Subarea B 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.20 0.00 0.00 Subarea A Subarea B 504.00 0.00 25.00 0.00 Grass pasture Unpaved 3.50 0.00 2.40 0.00 Subarea A 0.03 1686.00 3.00 5.00 6.00 7.62 3.69 Subarea B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11016-post-25.txt Total TOC (minutes): 22.02 Subbasin P-3 User -Defined TOC override (minutes): 10.00 Subbasin P-4 User -Defined TOC override (minutes): 10.00 Subbasin P-5 User -Defined TOC override (minutes): 10.00 Subbasin Runoff Summary Subbasin Total Total Peak weighted Time of ID Precip Runoff Runoff Curve Concentration in in cfs Number days hh:mm:ss P-1 2.200 0.292 0.56 69.000 0 00:10:00 P-2 2.200 0.574 23.08 77.360 0 00:22:01 P-3 2.200 1.012 9.670 86.150 0 00:10:00 P-4 2.200 0.865 11.570 83.570 0 00:10:00 P-5 2.200 1.972 0.730 98.000 0 00:10:00 System 2.200 0.665 45.61 Node Depth Summary Node Average Maximum Maximum Time of Max Total Total Retention ID Depth Depth HGL Occurrence Flooded Time Time Attained Attained Attained volume Flooded ft ft ft days hh:mm acre -in minutes hh:mm:ss Page 6 11016-post-25.txt Jun -4 0.55 2.59 6182.09 0 12:35 0 0 0:00:00 Out -1 0.00 0.00 6200.00 0 00:00 0 0 0:00:00 Out -3 0.47 1.50 6180.50 0 12:07 0 0 0:00:00 Jun -1 0.61 3.69 6183.69 0 12:35 0 0 0:00:00 Node Flow Summary Node Element Maximum Peak Time of Maximum Time of Peak ID Type Lateral Inflow Peak Inflow Flooding Flooding Inflow Occurrence Overflow Occurrence cfs cfs days hh:mm cfs days hh:mm Jun -4 JUNCTION 0.00 11.05 0 12:34 0.00 Out -1 OUTFALL 0.56 0.56 0 12:09 0.00 Out -3 OUTFALL 0.00 11.04 0 12:36 0.00 Jun -1 STORAGE 39.71 39.71 0 12:10 0.00 Detention Pond Summary Detention Pond ID Maximum Maximum Time of Max Average Average Maximum Maximum Time of Max. Total Ponded Ponded Ponded Ponded Ponded Pond Exfiltration Exfiltration Exfiltrated Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Outflow Rate Rate volume 1000 ft3 (%) days hh:mm 1000 ft3 (%) cfs cfm hh:mm:ss 1000 ft3 Jun -1 11.05 45.000 54 0 12:35 6.405 8 0.00 0:00:00 0.000 Outfall Loading Summary Outfall Node ID Flow Average Peak Frequency Flow Inflow (%) cfs cfs Page 7 Out -1 78.83 Out -3 90.13 11016-post-25.txt 0.04 0.56 2.35 11.04 System 84.48 Link Flow Summary 2.40 11.17 Link ID Element Design Ratio of Ratio of Type Flow Maximum Maximum Capacity /Design cfs Flow Depth Time of Maximum Total Peak Flow Velocity Time Occurrence Attained Flow Surcharged days hh:mm ft/sec Minutes Length Peak Flow Factor during Analysis cfs Con -1 19.98 Con -4 7.89 Reg -1 0.00 1.40 CONDUIT 0.50 CONDUIT 1.00 ORIFICE 1.00 0 00:00 0.00 1.00 0 0 12:36 6.25 1.00 115 0 12:34 Analysis begun on: Tue Jun 28 10:18:50 2011 Analysis ended on: Tue Jun 28 10:18:53 2011 Total elapsed time: 00:00:03 Page 8 0.00 11.04 11.05 I1016-post-I00.txt BOSS International StormNET6 - Version 4.19.3 (Build 221) �****.*********** Analysis Options **************** Flow Units Subbasin Hydrograph Method Time of Concentration Link Routing Method Pond Exfiltration Starting Date Ending Date Report Time Step ************* Element Count AAAAAAAAA1��� Number of rain gages Number of subbasins Number of nodes Number of links cfs SCS TR -55 SCS TR -55 Hydrodynamic None MAY -II -201I 00:00:00 MAY -I2 -201I 00:06:00 00:05:00 2 5 4 3 **************** Raingage Summary **************** Gage ID Data Source Data Type Interval hours 100 -YEAR 25 -year **************** Subbasin Summary **************** Subbasin ID 100 -YEAR 25 -year Total Area acres P-1 P-2 P-3 P-4 P-5 ************ Node Summary ************ Node ID 2.00 43.62 6.90 9.73 0.30 Element Type CUMULATIVE CUMULATIVE Invert Elevation ft Maximum Elev' ft 0.10 0.10 Ponded External Area Inflow ft2 Jun -4 Out -1 Out -3 Jun -1 JUNCTION OUTFALL OUTFALL STORAGE 6179.50 6200.00 6179.00 6180.00 Page 1 6183.00 6200.00 6180.50 6186.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Link Summary Link Manning's ID Roughness From Node 11016-post-100.txt To Node Element Length Slope Type ft Con -1 Jun -1 Jun -4 CONDUIT 0.0150 Con -4 Jun -4 Out -3 CONDUIT 0.0150 Reg -1 Jun -1 Jun -4 ORIFICE Cross Section Summary 135.1 4.8175 66.6 0.7512 Link Shape Depth/ width No. of Cross Full Flow Design ID Diameter Barrels Sectional Hydraulic Flow Radius ft Capacity cfs Area ft ft ft2 Con -1 0.38 Con -4 0.38 CIRCULAR 19.98 CIRCULAR 7.89 Runoff Quantity Continuity 1.50 1.50 1 1.77 1.50 1.50 1 1.77 volume Depth acre -ft inches Total Precipitation 13.732 Surface Runoff 0.482 Continuity Error (%) -0.000 Flow Routing Continuity Volume acre -ft 2.634 0.092 volume Mgallons External Inflow 0.000 0.000 External Outflow 4.706 1.533 Initial Stored volume 0.000 0.000 Final Stored Volume 0.104 0.034 Continuity Error (%) 0.001 Composite Curve Number Computations Report Subbasin P-1 Page 2 11016-post-100.txt Soil/Surface Description CN Area (acres) Soil Group Pasture, grassland, or range, Fair 69.00 Composite Area & weighted CN 69.00 Subbasin P-2 Soil/Surface Description CN 2.00 B 2.00 Area Soil (acres) Group 98.00 69.00 Composite Area & weighted CN 77.36 Subbasin P-3 Soil/Surface Description CN 12.57 31.05 43.62 Area Soil (acres) Group 98.00 69.00 Composite Area & weighted CN 86.15 Subbasin P-4 Soil/Surface Description CN 4.08 2.82 6.90 Area Soil (acres) Group 98.00 69.00 Composite Area & weighted CN 83.57 Subbasin P-5 Page 3 4.89 4.84 9.73 Area Soil 11016-post-100.txt Soil/Surface Description (acres) Group CN - 0.30 98.00 Composite Area & weighted CN 0.30 98.00 SCS TR -55 Time of Concentration Computations Report Sheet Flow Equation Tc = (0.007 ., ((n ., Lf)A0.8)) / ((PA0.5) (SfA0.4)) where: Tc = Time of Concentration (hrs) n = Manning's Roughness Lf = Flow Length (ft) P = 2 yr, 24 hr Rainfall (inches) Sf = Slope (ft/ft) Shallow Concentrated Flow Equation v = 16.1345 (SfA0.5) (unpaved surface) v = 20.3282 :; (SfA0.5) (paved surface) v = 15.0 (SfA0.5) (grassed waterway surface) v = 10.0 :; (SfA0.5) (nearly bare & untilled surface) v = 9.0 (SfA0.5) (cultivated straight rows surface) v = 7.0 :; (SfA0.5) (short grass pasture surface) v = 5.0 (SfA0.5) (woodland surface) V = 2.5 :; (SfA0.5) (forest w/heavy litter surface) Tc = (Lf / v) / (3600 sec/hr) where: Tc = Time of Concentration (hrs) Lf = Flow Length (ft) v = velocity (ft/sec) Sf = Slope (ft/ft) Channel Flow Equation v = (1.49 (RA(2/3)) (SfA0.5)) / n R = Aq / wp Tc = (Lf / v) / (3600 sec/hr) where: Tc = Time of Concentration (hrs) Lf = Flow Length (ft) R = Hydraulic Radius (ft) Aq = Flow Area (ft2) wp = wetted Perimeter (ft) v = velocity (ft/sec) Page 4 11016-post-100.txt sf = Slope (ft/ft) n = Manning's Roughness Subbasin P-1 User -Defined TOC override (minutes): 10.00 Subbasin P-2 Sheet Flow Computations Subarea C Manning's Roughness: 0.00 Flow Length (ft): 0.00 Slope (%): 0.00 2 yr, 24 hr Rainfall (in): 1.20 velocity (ft/sec): 0.00 Computed Flow Time (minutes): 0.00 Shallow Concentrated Flow Computations Subarea C Flow Length (ft): 0.00 Slope (%): 0.00 Surface Type: Unpaved velocity (ft/sec): 0.00 Computed Flow Time (minutes): 0.00 Channel Flow Computations Subarea C Manning's Roughness: 0.00 Flow Length (ft): 0.00 Channel Slope (%): 0.00 Cross Section Area (ft2): 0.00 wetted Perimeter (ft): 0.00 velocity (ft/sec): 0.00 Computed Flow Time (minutes): 0.00 Page 5 Subarea A 0.15 211.00 9.00 1.20 0.22 15.93 Subarea B 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.20 0.00 0.00 Subarea A Subarea B 504.00 0.00 25.00 0.00 Grass pasture Unpaved 3.50 0.00 2.40 0.00 Subarea A 0.03 1686.00 3.00 5.00 6.00 7.62 3.69 Subarea B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11016-post-100.txt Total TOC (minutes): 22.02 Subbasin P-3 User -Defined TOC override (minutes): 10.00 Subbasin P-4 User -Defined TOC override (minutes): 10.00 Subbasin P-5 User -Defined TOC override (minutes): 10.00 Subbasin Runoff Summary Subbasin Total Total Peak weighted Time of ID Precip Runoff Runoff Curve Concentration in in cfs Number days hh:mm:ss P-1 2.600 0.467 1.120 69.000 0 00:10:00 P-2 2.600 0.821 34.210 77.360 0 00:22:01 P-3 2.600 1.336 12.750 86.150 0 00:10:00 P-4 2.600 1.167 15.710 83.570 0 00:10:00 P-5 2.600 2.369 0.870 98.000 0 00:10:00 System 2.600 0.928 58.10 Node Depth Summary Node Average Maximum Maximum Time of Max Total Total Retention ID Depth Depth HGL Occurrence Flooded Time Time Attained Attained Attained volume Flooded ft ft ft days hh:mm acre -in minutes hh:mm:ss Page 6 11016-post-100.txt Jun -4 0.64 3.36 6182.86 0 12:38 0 0 0:00:00 Out -1 0.00 0.00 6200.00 0 00:00 0 0 0:00:00 Out -3 0.52 1.50 6180.50 0 12:02 0 0 0:00:00 Jun -1 0.75 5.26 6185.26 0 12:38 0 0 0:00:00 Node Flow Summary Node Element Maximum Peak Time of Maximum Time of Peak ID Type Lateral Inflow Peak inflow Flooding Flooding Inflow Occurrence Overflow Occurrence cfs cfs days hh:mm cfs days hh:mm Jun -4 JUNCTION 0.00 13.48 0 12:37 0.00 Out -1 OUTFALL 1.05 1.05 0 12:05 0.00 Out -3 OUTFALL 0.00 13.48 0 12:39 0.00 Jun -1 STORAGE 56.96 56.96 0 12:10 0.00 Detention Pond Summary Detention Pond ID Maximum Maximum Time of Max Average Average Maximum Maximum Time of Max. Total Ponded Ponded Ponded Ponded Ponded Pond Exfiltration Exfiltration Exfiltrated Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Outflow Rate Rate volume 1000 ft3 (%) days hh:mm 1000 ft3 (%) cfs cfm hh:mm:ss 1000 ft3 Jun -1 13.48 70.192 84 0 12:38 8.089 10 0.00 0:00:00 0.000 Outfall Loading Summary Outfall Node ID Flow Average Peak Frequency Flow Inflow (%) cfs cfs Page 7 Out -1 77.77 Out -3 91.26 11016-post-100.txt 0.06 1.05 2.78 13.48 System 84.51 Link Flow Summary 2.83 13.66 Link ID Element Design Ratio of Ratio of Type Flow Maximum Maximum Capacity /Design cfs Flow Depth Time of Maximum Total Peak Flow Velocity Time Occurrence Attained Flow Surcharged days hh:mm ft/sec Minutes Length Peak Flow Factor during Analysis cfs Con -1 19.98 Con -4 7.89 Reg -1 0.00 1.71 CONDUIT 0.50 CONDUIT 1.00 ORIFICE 1.00 0 00:00 0.00 1.00 0 0 12:39 7.63 1.00 180 0 12:37 Analysis begun on: Tue Jun 28 10:20:45 2011 Analysis ended on: Tue Jun 28 10:20:47 2011 Total elapsed time: 00:00:02 Page 8 0.00 13.48 13.48 Wt. qauel aaa fl uwiu u�,) min00n 'vnwa�ro ., ar+ll ma .02 '077 'af ilfalNlaw ra678VPS ntanni.lm.-0 SNIStl630VNIV2141N3Wd013A30°add 41181HX3 oavaoloo'h1NnDa a1311aVD 1N3WON3WY NVId &NCO LNYld 1-10.043 313U0N00114 Bd3M0d F ; 11 E a natiaI,lp Ai *MCI 61111104(03 SI .10L01 INA Lan w IaIM CW Vi 4{, '111V04011100 1YWlf MkYI N9 377 '6NIIIVINI9N Y� 8IIMOS MVS $NI$YB 3$'dNW Ia 1N3WdO13ARO.1$Qd : 119II.X3 MINfkA1/4103 t I NiwnN-11V N rtd dWOO 1NY Id 1.131V9 313NONOO11d VAM©d 1VI1-1 Y / I s 1-I I e W 1 �\ ti ..+•fes ti �► r ~ r +111111 , ~ y —1 - 1 Contractors Storage Yard Application 12015 All Valley Storage Sample Lease *Please note Section 8 on Pages 3 and 4 for language concerning items prohibited at the site. (attached) 211 Page Page 1 of 5 RENTAL AGREEMENT NOTICE: THIS AGREEEMENT IS A RENTAL AGREEMENT FOR A SELF -STORAGE PREMISES UNDER THE COLORADO SELF-SERVICE STORAGE FACILITY ACT. ANY PROPERTY STORED IN A SELF-SERVICE STORAGE FACILITY IS SUBJECT TO A LIEN IN FAVOR OF THE OWNER FOR RENT, LABOR, OR OTHER CHARGES PRESENT OR FUTURE IN RELATION TO THE PERSONAL PROPERTY AND FOR EXPENSES NECESSARY FOR ITS PRESERVATION OR EXPENSES REASONABLY INCURRED IN ITS SALE OR OTHER DISPOSITION. IF OCCUPANT DEFAULTS UNDER THIS RENTAL AGREEMENT, THE PROPERTY STORED IN THE PREMISES MAY BE SOLD TO SATISFY THE LIEN. THIS ACTION IS AUTHORIZED BY THE COLORADO SELF- SERVICE STORAGE FACILITY ACT, § 38-21.5-101 ET SEQ. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THIS RENTAL AGREEMENT: Date: This agreement dated <Tenant.LeaseSignDate>, between <Tenant.Name> (hereinafter referred to as "TENANT") and <Site.Name> (hereinafter referred to as "MANAGEMENT"). MANAGEMENT does hereby rent to TENANT storage unit number <Tenant.UnitName> (<Tenant.UnitWidth> x <Tenant.UnitLength>) in a building located at <Site.StreetAddress1> <Site.StreetAddress2>, <Site.City>, <Site.Region> <Site.PostalCode> to be used as storage for personal or business property for the monthly rate of <Tenant.RentalRate> payable on the first (1st) day of each month hereinafter. Rental payment is payable in advance. MANAGEMENT acknowledges receipt of as per your receipt, including the first (1st) month's rent (which has been prorated to the first (1st) day of next month where applicable). All payments made to MANAGEMENT pursuant to the agreement shall be applied first to administrative and late charges, then the balance to accrued and unpaid rent, this agreement shall expire on the last day of each month and automatically renew for one (1) additional month, SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS ON THE NEXT PAGE. Rental payments made after day <Rent.LateDay> of the month are subject to a <Tenant.LateFeel> Late Charge. Mailed payments must be postmarked by day <Rent.LateDay> of the month to avoid Late Charge. A returned Check is subject to a charge of <Tenant.FeeBadCheck>. There is a one-time <Tenant.FeeAdmin> non-refundable administrative fee charged when Tenant signs this lease. TENANT shall give MANAGEMENT ten (10) days written notice to vacate in order to avoid responsibility for the payment of the next month's rent. TENANT is an active member of the United States Armed Forces: Yes No TENANT acknowledges that MANAGEMENT does not carry any insurance which in any way covers any loss whatsoever that TENANT may have or claim by renting the Storage Unit. All property stored in the Storage Unit shall be at TENANT'S sole risk. TENANT ACKNOWLEDGES THAT HE HAS READ THE CONDITIONS ON THE NEXT PAGES AND AGREES TO BE BOUND BY THEM. Executed on <Tenant.LeaseSignDate>, Tenant Name: <Tenant.Name> (Tenant Signature) <Tenant.CompName> (Tenant Company Name) <Tenant. StreetAddress 1 > (Tenant Street Address) <Tenant.City>, <Tenant.Region> (Tenant City, State, Zip) <Tenant.HomePhone> (Tenant Home Phone) <Tenant.DriversLicense> By (Management Agent): <All Valley Storage, (Management Signature) <Tenant.PostalCode> <Tenant.WorkPhone> (Tenant Work Phone) <Tenant.DriversLicenseRegion> (Tenant Drivers License No.) (State) Lease Number: <Tenant.LeaseNo> Please Remit To: <Site.Name> <Site.StreetAddress1> <Site.StreetAddress2> <Site.City>, <Site.Region> <Site.PostalCode> Page 2 of 5 Conditions 1. Month -to -Month Term and Renewal: This Rental Agreement for the lease of a self -storage space (the "Premises") from All Valley Storage, LLC or Green Diamond Investments, LLC as indicated in the Terms and Conditions above at All Valley Storage - Carbondale or All Valley Storage - Silt (the "Facility") is on a month-to-month basis and shall automatically renew for successive one month periods on the first day of each month unless terminated by Owner or Occupant pursuant to Provision 6 in the Lease and Occupant has fully removed all Property from the Premises and removed Occupant's lock. A one month minimum rental is required. 2. Rent is Due on the First of Each Month: Rent shall be in the amount specified above, payable monthly to Owner in advance, without demand or notice, on the First of each month during the term of this Rental Agreement and any extensions or renewals thereof. If this Rental Agreement was executed on or after the 20th day of the month, then the second months Rent has been paid in advance and next Rent is due on the date stated in the Summary of Terms and Conditions. Occupant agrees to pay Rent in person, by mail, or with credit card in person or by written authorization, or by the storage kiosk located at the Carbondale Facility, and shall not mail or deliver Rent in the form of cash into the office by any "drop slot". Occupant is required to obtain a receipt for any cash payment. Occupant shall pay Rent even if Occupant does not receive an invoice or bill. Owner may require payments of Rent to be in the form of money order, cash, or cashier's check, in the event Occupant is in Default or has any payment due Owner returned for any reason including insufficient funds. Rent is non-refundable. Any rent payment made by the internet or payment kiosk must be in the full amount due at the time of payment. If less than full payment is made over the internet or at the kiosk, said payment shall be deemed automatically refused and any sums submitted shall be returned to Occupant at Occupant's last known address, even if Occupant obtains a receipt from the internet site or kiosk. No payments including internet or kiosk can be made within forty-eight (48) hours of a lien sale, all payments must be made hand to Owner and accepted. 3. Credit/Debit Card Authorization for Payment of Rent and Other Charges: Occupant has authorized Owner to automatically charge or debit the charge or credit/debt card referenced in the Terms and Conditions section of the Rental Agreement (which is owned by the Occupant) on the first day of each month, or as soon as reasonably practicable thereafter, in the amount stated in the Terms & Conditions of this Rental Agreement, as Rent for each and every month Occupant continues to occupy the Premises. This authorization shall continue and include any increases in Rent and other charges assessed to the Occupant. In any circumstance, in the event Occupant terminates this authorization or the Rental Agreement owing any Rent or other charges due to Owner, Owner may charge/debit Occupant's credit/debit card any sum due and owing upon termination including, but not exclusively, damages to the Premises or Facility, outstanding Rent due, any other default charges, clean up charges, dumpster charges, and any other sums due and owing at the termination. 4. Security Deposit: Owner acknowledges receipt of the Security Deposit specified above which shall secure Occupant's performance of all terms of this Rental Agreement. The Security Deposit may be waived by Owner in the event Occupant provides Owner the credit card for payment of Rent and other charges on an automatic recurring basis as described in Provision 3. Occupant agrees that Owner need not segregate the Security Deposit from other funds and that no interest will be due Occupant for the period during which the Security Deposit is held. The Security Deposit shall be returned to Occupant within thirty (30) days of termination, if Occupant gives proper notice as described in Provisions 6 and 21, less all charges for cleaning, repairing or otherwise preparing the Premises for rental to others. Owner may also deduct from the Security Deposit any unpaid Rent, damages, charges, costs, or expenses due to Owner. 5. Administration Fee: Contemporaneously with the execution of the Rental Agreement Occupant has paid to Owner a non-refundable Administration Fee in the amount listed in the Terms and Conditions section of the Rental Agreement above. The Administration Fee is intended to defray some of the initial set-up, preparation costs and other expenses incurred in entering into a new self -storage Rental Agreement. This Administration Fee is non-refundable under any circumstances. 6. Termination. Occupant may terminate this Rental Agreement at any time if all Rent and charges are paid in full (through the end of the month) and Occupant notifies Owner of Occupant's vacating of the Premises at least fourteen (14) days before the end of the month. Owner may terminate this Rental Agreement by giving Occupant fourteen (14) days written notice prior to the end of the term or any renewal term. The Premises shall be left broom clean, free of trash, and Occupant shall remove all Personal Property (or additional Rent may accrue) and the Occupant's lock must be removed. Occupant shall fully vacate by the date stated in Occupant's or Owner's Notice. Owner charges and Occupant is responsible for a Fifty Dollar ($50.00) per hour per person charge for cleaning the Premises, minimum one (1) hour, plus costs including any disposal fees, if Owner must remove property and/or clean the Premises. 7. Other Charges and Fees: Occupant is in Default if Rent is not paid by the first sole discretion of the Owner. If Occupant is in default, the following fees shall be charged: Late /Overlock Fee (on the 10th day after Rent is due) Notice of Default charge (on the 20th day after Rent is due) Notice of Default charge (on date mailed) Sale Fee (imposed on day advertisement runs (including ad cost)) NSF/Returned Check Fee Cleaning Fee (1 hour minimum) Lock Cut Fee (at Occupant's request) Eviction notice (in lieu of default notice) Eviction charge (in lieu of sale) of each month, and any Rent accepted thereafter shall be at the 15% of Rent charge for the month $ 20.00 $ 20.00 + Certified Mail Fees $100.00 $ 35.00 + Applicable late fees $ 50.00 per hour/per person + disposal fees $ 50.00 $ 20.00 $150.00 For the purpose of determining if Rent is paid on time, the date the payment is received in the Owner's office, not the postmark date is used. Notwithstanding the date that other fees and charges are imposed, if payment is not made within thirty (30) consecutive days Owner may begin enforcement of its lien against Occupant's Property. Occupant shall pay Owner all other costs and expenses incurred by Owner arising out of or related in any manner to a breach of this Rental Agreement particularly any charges incurred for Rent, late fees, or other charges and expenses incurred in enforcing the lien by Owner, Owner's collection of any amount owed by the Occupant, or the exercise of any remedy by Owner upon a Default by Occupant (including the sale or other disposition of Occupant's Property) as permitted under this Rental Agreement or by law. Occupant shall be liable to Owner for Owner's attorney's fees incurred in enforcing any of Owner's rights or Occupant's responsibilities under this Rental Agreement. 8. Use of Premises and Prohibited Storage: The Premises shall be used and occupied only for the storing of personal property owned by Occupant. Occupant shall keep the Premises in a clean and sanitary condition and free of rubbish, liquid waste or refuse, no guns or alcohol may be stored in the Premises. Occupant shall not use the Premises for the operation of any commercial, industrial, manufacturing or distribution business, and shall not conduct any hobby, wood, metal or other material work in the Premises. Occupant shall not use the Premises for the use or storage of any food; animal feed (including seed); store or release any explosives; highly flammable, dangerous, hazardous or toxic materials or substances (as defined below); noxious smelling items; items which emit a gas or odor when exposed to moisture; contraband or illegal substances; or for any unlawful purpose of any kind. Occupant shall not engage in any activity in the Premises which produces or releases such prohibited materials. Occupant shall not use the Premises for storage of any gasoline or other fuel oil, grease, or any other lubricant, tires or batteries, or any other accessories, except for such gas, oil, grease, or other lubricant as may be contained in the operating parts of the items stored in the Premises and in such case Occupant shall store the Property Page 3 of 5 with no more than one quarter (1/4) tank of gas and a drip pan or absorbent pad designed to absorb petroleum products under the Property to retain any leaking fluids. No propane or empty propane canisters may be stored in the Premises. No gas canisters shall be stored in the Premises. A Vehicle Storage Addendum must be completed and executed by Owner for any "titled" vehicle stored in the Premises. Occupant shall not live or sleep in the Premises, nor shall animals be permitted to be stored in the Premises. Occupant shall not use or allow the Premises to be used for the release, storage, use, treatment, disposal or other handling of any hazardous substance without prior written consent of Owner. The term "release" shall have the same meaning as ascribed to it in the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. Section 9602, et seq., as amended, ("CERCLA"). The term "hazardous substance" means: i. Any substance defined as a "hazardous substance" under CERCLA; ii. Petroleum, petroleum products, natural gas, natural gas liquids, liquefied natural gas and synthetic gas, and; iii. Any other substance or material deemed to be hazardous, dangerous, toxic, or a pollutant under any federal, state or local law, code, ordinance or regulation. 9. Limitation on Value of Personal Property: Occupant agrees not to store property in the Premises with a total value in excess of $5,000.00 without the prior written permission of the Owner. If such written permission is not obtained, the value of property shall be deemed not to exceed $5,000.00. The Premises is not appropriate for storage of irreplaceable property such as books, writings, objects which have an unknown immediate resale market value, or objects which have a special, sentimental, or emotional value to Occupant. By this Rental Agreement, Owner is generally not liable for the loss of Occupant's Property. In the event any competent court of law adjudicates Owner liable for any loss, for any reason, damages shall be limited as described in the next Paragraph. This provision shall not constitute an admission that Occupant's Property has any value whatsoever. Higher value limits for property may be available upon Occupant's written request to Owner in exchange for additional consideration. See Owner for details. The fact that Occupant may insure said Property for an amount greater than the storage limit shall not waive Owner's right to deem the Property collectively stored to be worth no more than $5,000.00. Notwithstanding anything in this Rental Agreement or any addendum to modify the limit on the value of Personal Property, in no event will Owner or Owner's agents be liable to Occupant or Occupant's agents for an amount in excess of Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for any loss or damage whatsoever, including, but not limited to, the active or passive acts, the omissions or negligence of Owner or Owner's agents. Occupant will not sue Owner or Owner's agents with respect to any claim, cause or action, loss, or injury to the extent liability therefore has been limited or eliminated pursuant to this Provision. So long as Occupant complies with the requirements of Provisions 8 and 9, Owner does not concern itself with the type, quantity, or quality of the Property Stored. 10. Damages: Occupant shall be responsible to Owner for the costs of repair, clean-up, and replacement for any damages caused as a result of Occupant's storage in the Premises, use of the Premises, or use of the common areas of the Facility including damage to other occupant's property. In the event Owner invoices Occupant for any charges for repairs, clean-up, replacement, or other damages suffered, Occupant shall pay the invoice within ten (10) days or it shall become Additional Rent due and payable with the next month's rental obligation. The failure to pay such invoice represents a default under this Agreement. This Provision and the requirement to pay for any damages shall survive the termination of this Agreement. 11. Insurance and Security Type Systems: Occupant agrees, at his/her sole expense, to maintain insurance on all Property stored in the Premises with actual cash value coverage against all perils, without exception. Occupant's failure to maintain such insurance shall be a breach of this Rental Agreement, constituting an Event of Default hereunder, and Occupant shall assume all risk of loss of damage that would have been covered by such insurance. Owner employs certain measures to protect Owner's property referred to as "Security Type Systems." The operation or failure of any type of Security Type System installed by Owner shall not change Owner's aforementioned liability for any type of loss incurred by Occupant and shall in no way release Occupant from his/her obligation of insuring his/her Personal Property. These systems may include an electric gate and video cameras, however, Occupant acknowledges that these measures are for the protection of the Facility as a whole and not the individual Premises, that video cameras are not monitored, and that these systems may not operate properly in the event of a mechanical, electrical, or software failure. Further, video cameras may not be recorded or may not be recorded at all times and do not record all parts of the Facility. (Information about self storage insurance is available through Owner's office. Please ask for information from Owner.) Higher value limits for Personal Property stored may be requested in writing by Occupant for additional consideration and, if accepted by Owner in writing, shall modify this provision only. 12. Access: Occupant's access to the Premises and the Facility may be limited as reasonably deemed necessary by Owner, including, but not limited to, requiring photographic identification from Occupant, limiting hours of operation, or requiring Occupant to sign -in and sign -out upon entering and leaving the Facility, including the temporary closure of portions of the Facility for repairs and maintenance. Owner may change the times and methods of access to the Facility with thirty (30) days written notice posted at Owner's office at the Facility or mailed to Occupant. In the event of an emergency at or around the Facility, Owner may require Occupant enter only when escorted by Owner's employees or agents. Owner shall not be liable to Occupant for Occupant's or his/her invitee's inability to gain gate access due to mechanical failure, misuse of gate code(s), or any other reason. 13. Mold: Occupant understands that there is a risk of the growth of mold and/or mildew on Occupant's Personal Property. Owner does not warrant the Premises to be water -tight or dry. Mold is a naturally -occurring substance and it is possible to have mold appear or grow on Occupant's property. To help avoid mold, Owner recommends storing property off the concrete floor, such as on pallets or shelves (do not attach to the Premises), wrapping certain property in plastic and keeping goods susceptible to mold from touching the walls of the Premises. Occupant understands that any property brought into the Premises that is damp or wet will likely grow mold or mildew because of its wet or damp condition when brought into the Premises. Owner recommends periodically inspecting the Premises and the property and taking any and all actions necessary to protect Occupant's property. 14. Locked Premises; Storage Occupant's Risk; Abandonment: Occupant is required to keep the Premises locked using one lock per door. Owner shall not retain a key to Occupant's lock. If a lock is removed for a reason described elsewhere in the Rental Agreement, including Default by Occupant, then Occupant shall replace the lock with another lock at Occupant's sole expense. If the Premises is found open or if a lock is removed for an inventory or sale, Owner may, but is not required to, lock the Premises at Occupant's expense. All property stored by Occupant within the Premises shall be at Occupant's sole risk. If the Premises is not locked, Owner may consider the Premises abandoned and dispose of any or all Personal Property in the Premises. Owner may dispose of or sell the Personal Property abandoned in the Premises. Owner is not a warehouseman engaged in the business of storing goods for hire. Owner shall have no obligation to exercise any care, custody or control over Occupant's Personal Property. Owner assumes no responsibility for any loss, damage or casualty however caused to such Personal Property. 15. Release of Liability: Occupant releases Owner, its employees, agents, successors, and assigns from any and all liability for property damage or loss of property; for damage or loss from, as examples, fire, water, the elements, mold or mildew, Acts of God, theft, burglary, vandalism, malicious mischief, mysterious disappearance, and rodent damage; or the acts or failure to act or negligence of Owner, its employees, or agents. Occupant further releases Owner, its employees, agents, successors, and assigns from any and all liability for personal injuries or death to persons including Occupant and Occupant's family or invitees arising out of Occupants use of the Premises and Facility. Self storage insurance is strongly recommended. The only insurance that covers the property stored in the Premises is that purchased by Occupant. Occupant understands that this Release of Owner's liability is a bargained for condition of this Rental Agreement and Owner's consent to enter into this Rental Agreement, and that if Owner were not released from the liability as set forth in Provisions 15 and 16, a much higher Rent would have to be agreed upon or Owner would not enter into this Rental Agreement. Page 4 of 5 16. Indemnification; Subrogation: Occupant agrees to have its insurer waive any right of subrogation of any claim of Occupant against Owner, its employees, or agents. Occupant agrees to indemnify, defend and hold Owner harmless from any and all loss, claim, demands, damage, liability, expense, fines or penalties arising out of or related in any manner to such foregoing injuries, death or losses to person or property, or damages to Occupants property however occurring, or arising out of or related to any breach of this Rental Agreement by Occupant. Occupant shall also pay Owner for all of Owner's attorney fees incurred in enforcing any obligation under this Provision. 17. Owner May Enter: Owner, its employees or agents and the representatives of any governmental or quasi -governmental authority, including police and fire officials, shall have the right to remove Occupant's lock and enter the Premises, without notice to Occupant, to take such action as may be necessary to preserve Owner's property in the event of an Emergency, or to comply with any applicable law, governmental or court order, warrant, subpoena, or to enforce any of Owner's rights. For the purposes of this Rental Agreement, "Emergency" shall be defined as any event which jeopardizes the health, safety, and/or well-being of any person or of the Facility or any of the buildings or the land appurtenant to the buildings or any other property or chattels stored at the Facility. Owner shall further have the right, on a non -emergency basis, to remove Occupant's lock and enter the Premises with reasonable notice to Occupant to make any repairs, replacements, other desirable improvements or conduct any inspections of Owner's property (the "Work"). Owner will endeavor to give a minimum of three days notice to Occupant of the Work and, if Occupant is available, will schedule an appointment with Occupant to remove Occupant's lock to allow the Work. If Occupant is unavailable or unable to provide Owner access, Owner may cut or remove and replace the lock after the Work has been completed with a lock of similar or better quality. Occupant may obtain keys to the replacement lock from Owner's office during Office Hours. 18. Responsibility to Notify of a Condition in the Premises: Occupant shall immediately notify Owner should Occupant become aware of any noxious odors, sounds, or other conditions, including without limitation, the presence of any mold or similar condition in Occupant's Premises or emanating spreading from or through any other Premises. Upon receipt of such notification, or should Owner become aware of such conditions, Owner may, notwithstanding anything to the contrary to this Agreement, enter Occupant's Premises without notice to make any such necessary inspection, repair, or alteration. Should any such conditions result from Occupant's use of the Premises or from a breach by Occupant of the terms of this Agreement, all costs and expenses incurred by Owner in addressing such conditions shall be paid by Occupant on demand and if not paid, shall become Additional Rent. 19. Owner's Lien: Pursuant to the Colorado Self -Service Storage Facility Act 38-21.5-101 et seq., the Owner of a self storage facility and his or her heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns have a lien upon all personal property located at the self-service storage facility for rent, labor, or other charges, present or future, in relation to the personal property and for expenses necessary for its preservation or expenses reasonably incurred in its sale or other disposition. This lien attaches as of the date the personal property is brought to the self-service storage facility. Explanation: The Occupant's Property may be sold to satisfy the lien if Occupant is in default. 20. Defaults; Owner Remedies: If Occupant breaches any term or condition of this Rental Agreement (a "Default"), Owner in addition to such other rights it may have under this Rental Agreement and law shall have the right to terminate this Rental Agreement. If Occupant fails to pay any Rent or other charges when due or if the Rental Agreement is terminated by Owner for cause, Owner may: (i) deactivate gate access and overlock the Premises at any time after Default; (ii) remove Occupant's lock and access the Premises; (iii) inventory and/or take possession if desired, of the Personal Property located in the Premises; (iv) sell or dispose of the Personal Property in the Premises as permitted by law; or (v) pursue any and all remedies available, at law or equity, including a forcible entry and detainer action against Occupant. All remedies available to Owner shall be cumulative and the exercise of one or more remedies shall not exclude or waive Owner's rights as to any other remedy. 21. Notices: Except as otherwise required by law, all notices under this Rental Agreement from Owner to Occupant shall be mailed by first class U.S. mail, postage pre -paid, to Occupant's last known address and shall be conclusively presumed to have been received by Occupant three (3) business days after mailing. All notices from Occupant to Owner shall be mailed by first class U.S. mail, postage pre -paid, to Owner, at the address of the Facility listed on the first page of this Rental Agreement. Occupant is responsible for notifying Owner in writing, via certified mail return receipt requested, or in person at the office address listed on this Rental Agreement on a form prescribed by Owner of any change in Occupant's address or of intent to vacate at the end of the term. 22. Partial Payments or Payment in the Event of Default: Partial payments shall not be accepted. 23. Assignment and Subletting: Occupant may not assign its rights under this Rental Agreement or sublet the Premises without the prior written consent of Owner. This Rental Agreement shall be binding upon the heirs, assigns, executors, administrators, representatives and successors of the parties hereto. 24. Governing Law; Jury Trial; Severability: This Rental Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Colorado without regard to its conflict of laws provisions. Owner and Occupant agree to waive their respective rights to trial by jury of any cause of action, claim, counterclaim or cross complaint in any action arising out of or connected in any manner with this Rental Agreement, including any action for bodily injury, death or property damage. Owner and Occupant further agree that the federal or state courts in Garfield County, Colorado shall have exclusive jurisdiction for any litigation related to this Rental Agreement. If any part or provision of this Rental Agreement is determined to be unenforceable by a court of law, the parties agree that all remaining parts or provisions of this Rental Agreement shall remain in effect and be valid and enforceable. 25. Entire Agreement: This Rental Agreement is the entire agreement between the parties and supersedes any and all prior oral or written representations or agreements and may be modified only in a writing signed by Occupant and Owner. The pre-printed terms of this Rental Agreement may only be modified in writing signed by the General Manager of Owner. 26. Counterparts, Headings and Gender: This Rental Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and when taken together shall constitute one Rental Agreement. The headings in this Rental Agreement are for the convenience of both parties. In the event of any conflict between the heading and the language of the term, the language of the term shall control. Whenever the context so indicates the masculine, feminine or neuter gender and the singular or plural number shall be deemed to include the others. 27. Agreement to Mediate: Realizing that in Self -Storage relationships there is always a possibility of differences of opinion or other disagreements and that what is most important is to resolve any disputes amicably, quickly, inexpensively and professionally and to return to business as soon as possible, it is with that spirit of cooperation that Owner and Occupant pledge to resolve differences and to use the procedures specified in this Rental Agreement. Therefore, Owner and Occupant agree as follows: with the exception of non-payment of Occupant's Rent and Owner's right to conduct a lien sale, declare an abandonment, or evict as a result of Default under this Rental Agreement, or apply the security deposit, if any; that any litigation, claim, dispute, suit, action, controversy, proceeding or otherwise ("claim") between or involving Owner and Occupant, whether arising out of or relating in any way to this Rental Agreement and/or any other document, any alleged breach of any duty, or otherwise will be submitted to non-binding mediation for a minimum of eight hours before any mediation organization approved by Owner and Occupant located within 25 miles of the Facility. In the mediation, Owner and Occupant shall each be represented by an individual authorized to make binding commitments on their respective behalves and may be represented by counsel. In addition, Owner and Occupant may, with permission of the mediator, bring such additional persons as are needed to respond to questions, contribute information and participate in the negotiations. The fees and expenses of the mediator and/or mediation organization shall be shared equally by Owner and Occupant. The mediator shall be disqualified as a witness, consultant, expert or counsel for any party with respect to the dispute and any related matters. Page 5 of 5 28. Owner's Employees: In the event Occupant requests any of Owner's employees to perform any services for Occupant, it shall be done at Occupant's own risk as Occupant's agent, regardless of whether payment is made for said service(s). Occupant agrees to release, hold harmless and indemnify Owner for any loss, charge or injury Occupant may suffer related to the use of Owner's employees. 29. Warranty of Information: Occupant warrants all information given in this Rental Agreement or any application preceding this Rental Agreement is complete, true and accurate at the time of this Rental Agreement. 30. Occupant's Acceptance of Premises "AS IS". Occupant inspected or had the right to inspect the Premises and Facility before signing this Rental Agreement and finds the Premises to be suitable for the purpose for which Occupant rents such Premises and accepts the same "as is." Owner makes no express warranties. Owner disclaims and Occupant waives all implied warranties, including but not limited to implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose to the fullest extent permitted by law. Occupant acknowledges that Owner's Agents have no authority to make warranties, express or implied. 31. Pest Control: Occupant is advised that Owner may use chemicals at the Facility including around the Premises, for pest control. For this reason, no pets are allowed. 32. Permission to Call, Fax and/or E -Mail: Occupant recognizes Owner and Occupant are entering into a business relationship at the Facility. As such, to the extent any Federal or State law prohibits Owner from contacting Occupant by phone, fax, or e-mail, Occupant hereby consents to Owner phoning, faxing, and e -mailing Occupant and that these conditions are related to the business relationship. 33. Rules and Regulation: The Rules and Regulation of this Facility are incorporated herein and made a pert of this Monthly Rental Agreement as if fully re -written herein. The Rules and Regulations can be changed with thirty (30) days notice as described in the Rules and Regulations, without regard for the term of this Agreement, so long as the revised Rules and Regulations apply to all occupants and are made for the appropriate and efficient operation of the Facility. 34. Release of Information: Occupant hereby authorizes All Valley Storage, LLC to obtain consumer reports and any other information Owner deems necessary, for the purpose of evaluating Occupant's application. Occupant understands that such information may include, but is not limited to, credit history, criminal and civil information, records of arrest, rental history, employment salary details, vehicle records, licensing records, and/or any other necessary information. Occupant understands that such collected consumer reports may be obtained and utilized under this authorization in connection with an update, removal, extension, or collection with respect or in connection with the rental of the Premises for which this Rental Agreement was made. The undersigned hereby acknowledges that he/she has read, reviewed, understands, and has had the opportunity to ask questions about this Rental Agreement in its entirety (four pages) and agree(s) to be bound by its terms and conditions. **I HAVE READ ALL FIVE (5) PAGES OF THIS RENTAL AGREEMENT** TENANT: Tenant Initails Contractors Storage Yard Application 12015 Signage Concept (attached) 221 Page Signage Concept Located on Highway 82 30" Outdoor Storage 970.945.9821 Brought to you by: All Valley Storage, LLC Space Available Contractors Welcome $,_0„ Contractors Storage Yard Application 12015 Construction Schedule (attached) 231 Page All Valley Storage Contractors Yard Construction Schedule 2/2/2015 ID Description Start Complete 1 2 3 4 5 Basic Grading & Drainage Dress Site with Gravel Install Fencing Install Gates/Tech/Signage Install Porta Pottie -Construction Complete - 4/15/2015 4/27/2015 4/27/2015 5/4/2015 5/15/2015 4/24/2015 5/1/2015 5/8/2015 5/15/2015 5/15/2015 Contractors Storage Yard Application 12015 CDOT ACESS PERMIT (attached) 241 Page COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTAT STATE HIGHWAY ACCESS .PERMIT ON Permit fee $300.00 Date f transmittal 6/22/2012 Region/Section/Patrol 3 / 02 / 12-2 Garry Williams COOT Permit No. State Highway Nalrvlpt 082 A % 13.490 Local Jurisdiction Garfield .County 312039 e L' The Perrnittee(s), Lafarge West Sean Frisch 10170 Church Ranch Way, Suite 200 Westminster, CO 80021 720-320-2451 Applicant: Sopris Engineering Yancy Nichol. 502 Main Street; Suite A3 Carbondale, CO 81623 970-704-0311. =fret No.: is hereby granted permission to have an access to the state highway at the location noted below. The access shall be constructed, maintained and used in. accordance with this permit; including the State Highway Access Code and any'attachments, terms, conditions and exhibits, This permit may be revoked by the issuing authority if at any time the permitted access and its use violate any parts .of this permit. The issuing authority, the Department and their duly appointed agents and employees shall beheld harmless against any action for personal injury or property damage:. sustained by reason of the exercise of the permit. Location: Garfield County Road 103 Access to Provide Service to: (Land use Code:). 998 - County Road (Size or Count) (Units) Additional Information: MUNICIPALITY OR COUNTY APPROVAL Required only when the appropriate local authority retains issuing authority. Signature Print Name Title Date Upon the signing of this permit theperm'ttee agrees to the terms and conditions and referenced attachments contained herein. All construction shall be completed in an expeditious and safe manner and shall be finished within 45 days from Initiation. The permitted -access .Shall be completedin accordance with the terms and conditions of the permit prior to being used. The permittee shall notify Les Stanton 2K2 with the Colorado Department of Transportation In Grand Junction, Colorado at (970) 384-3357, at least 48 hours prior to commencing construction within the State Highway right-of-way. The person signing as the permittee must, .t r or tegal representative of the property served by the permitted access and have full authority to accept the permit and its terms an editions. PymIttee Signatur, Print Name 1 rra Date This permit is not valid until signed by a duly authorized representative of the. Department. COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION . Copy distribution: Required: t .Region 2.Applicant Print Name T� e" `a1 1n Date (of issue) Make copies as necessary tor: Previous editio are obsolete and may not be used 3.Sielt Acoess Section Local Authority Inspector Page 1 of 3 COOT Form #101 5/0? 4.Central Fifes . MICE Patrol 'Traffic Engineer State Highway Access Permit Form 101, Page 2 The following paragraphs are excerpts of the State Highway Access Code. These are provided for your convenience but do not alleviate compliance with all sections of the Access Code. A copy of the State Highway Access Code is available from your local issuing authority (local government) or the Colorado Department of Transportation (Department). When this permit was issued, the issuing authority made its decision based in part on information submitted by the applicant, on the access category which is assigned to the highway, what alternative access to other public roads and streets is available, and safety and design standards. Changes in use or design not approved by the permit or the issuing authority may cause the revocation or suspension of the permit. APPEALS 1. Should the permittee or applicant object to the denial of a permit application by the Department or object to any of the terms or conditions of a permit placed there by the Department, the applicant and permittee (appellant) have a right to appeal the decision to the [Transportation] Commission [of Colorado]. To appeal a decision, submit a request for administrative hearing to the Transportation Commission of Colorado within 60 days of transmittal of notice of denial or transmittal of the permit for signature. Submit the request to the Transportation Commission of Colorado, 4201 East Arkansas Avenue, Denver, Colorado 80222-3400. The request shall include reasons for the appeal and may include changes, revisions, or conditions that would be acceptable to the permittee or applicant. 2. Any appeal by the applicant or permittee of action by a local issuing authority shall be filed with the local authority and be consistent with the appeal procedures of the local authority. 3. In submitting the request for administrative hearing, the appellant has the option of including within the appeal a request for a review by the Department's internal administrative review committee pursuant to [Code] subsection 2.10. When such committee review is requested, processing of the appeal for formal administrative hearing, 2.9(5) and (6), shall be suspended until the appellant notifies the Commission to proceed with the administrative hearing, or the appellant submits a request to the Commission or the administrative law judge to withdraw the appeal. The two administrative processes, the internal administrative review committee, and the administrative hearing, may not run concurrently. 4. Regardless of any communications, meetings, administrative reviews or negotiations with the Department or the internal administrative review Committee regarding revisions or objections to the permit or a denial, if the permittee or applicant wishes to appeal the Department's decision to the Commission for a hearing, the appeal must be brought to the Commission within 60 days of transmittal of notice of denial or transmittal of the permit. PERMIT EXPIRATION 1. A permit shall be considered expired if the access is not under construction within one year of the permit issue date or before the expiration of any authorized extension. When the permittee is unable to commence construction within one year after the permit issue date, the permittee may request a one year extension from the issuing authority. No more than two one-year extensions may be granted under any circumstances. If the access is not under construction within three years from date of issue the permit will be considered expired. Any request for an extension must be in writing and submitted to the issuing authority before the permit expires. The request should state the reasons why the extension is necessary, when construction is anticipated, and include a copy of page 1 (face of permit) of the access permit. Extension approvals shall be in writing. The local issuing authority shall obtain the concurrence of the Department prior to the approval of an extension, and shall notify the Department of all denied extensions within ten days. Any person wishing to reestablish an access permit that has expired may begin again with the application procedures. An approved Notice to Proceed, automatically renews the access permit for the period of the Notice to Proceed. CONSTRUCTION 1. Construction may not begin until a Notice to Proceed is approved. (Code subsection 2.4] 2. The construction of the access and its appurtenances as required by the terms and conditions of the permit shall be completed at the expense of the permittee except as provided in subsection 2.14. All materials used in the construction of the access within the highway right-of-way or on permanent easements, become public property. Any materials removed from the highway right-of-way will be disposed of only as directed by the Department. All fencing, guard rail, traffic control devices and other equipment and materials removed in the course of access construction shall be given to the Department unless otherwise instructed by the permit or the Department inspector. 3. The permittee shall notify the individual or the office specified on the permit or Notice to Proceed at least two working days prior to any construction within state highway right-of-way. Construction of the access shall not proceed until both the access permit and the Notice to Proceed are issued. The access shall be completed in an expeditious and safe manner and shall be finishdd within 45 days from initiation of construction within the highway right-of-way. A construction time extension not to exceed 30 working days may be requested from the individual or office specified on the permit. 4. The issuing authority and the Department may inspect the access during construction and upon completion of the access to ensure that all terms and conditions of the permit are met. Inspectors are authorized to enforce the conditions of the permit during construction and to halt any activities within state right-of-way that do not comply with the provisions of the permit, that conflict with concurrent highway construction or maintenance work, that endanger State Highway Access Permit Form 101, Page 3 highway property, natural or cultural resources protected by law, or the health and safety of workers or the public. 5. Prior to using the access, the permittee is required to complete the construction according to the terms and conditions of the permit. Failure by the permittee to abide by all permit terms and conditions shall be sufficient cause for the Department or issuing authority to initiate action to suspend or revoke the permit and close the access. If in the determination of the Department or issuing authority the failure to comply with or complete the construction requirements of the permit create a highway safety hazard, such shall be sufficient cause for the summary suspension of the permit. If the permittee wishes to use the access prior to completion, arrangements must be approved by the issuing authority and Department and included in the permit. The Department or issuing authority may order a halt to any unauthorized use of the access pursuant to statutory and regulatory powers. Reconstruction or improvement of the access may be required when the permittee has failed to meet required specifications of design or materials. If any construction element `fails within two years due to improper construction or material specifications, the permittee shall be responsible for all repairs. Failure to make such repairs may result in suspension of the. permit and closure of the access. 6. The permittee shall,16provide construction traffic control devices at all times during; access construction, in conformance with the M.U.T.C.D. as required by section 42-4-104, C.R.S., as amended. 7. A utility permit shall be obtained for any utility work within highway right-of-way. Where necessary to remove, relocate, or repair a traffic control device or public or private utilities for the construction of a permitted access, the relocation, removal or repair shall be accomplished by the permittee without cost to the Department or issuing authority, and at the direction of the Department or utility company. Any damage to the state highway or other public right-of-way beyond that which is allowed in the permit shall be repaired immediately. The permittee is responsible for the repair of any utility damaged in the course of access construction, reconstruction or repair. 8. In the event it becomes necessary to remove any right-of- way fence, the posts on either side of the access shall be securely braced with an approved end post before the fence is cut to prevent any slacking of the remaining fence. AM posts and wire removed are De E ,artment property and shall be turned over to a representative of the Department. 9. The permittee shall ensure that a copy of the permit is available for review at the construction site at all times. The permit may require the contractor to notify the individual or office specified on the permit at any specified phases in construction to allow the: field inspector to inspect various aspects of construction such as concrete forms, subbase, base course compaction, and rriaterials specifications. Minor changes and additions may be ordered by the Department or local authority field inspector tomeet unanticipated site conditions. 10. Each access shall be constructed in a manner that shall not cause water to enter onto the roadway or shoulder, and shall not interfere with the existing drainage system on the right-of- way or any adopted municipal system and drainage plan. or clearances required for construction of the access. Issuance of this access permit does not constitute verification of the above required actions by the Permittee. By accepting the permit, the permittee stipulates and agrees to fully protect, save, defend, indemnify, and hold harmless, to the extent allowed by law, the issuing Authority, and each of the Authority's directors, officers, employees, agents and representatives, from and against any and all claims, costs (including but not limited to all reasonable fees and charges of engineers, architects, attorneys, and other professionals or expert witnesses and all court or other dispute resolution costs directly incurred by reason of claims directly brought against the Authority), losses, damages, pre- or post- judgment interest, causes of action, suits, or liability of any nature whatsoever by reason of liability imposed due to Permittee's failure to obtain, or disregard of, any applicable federal, state or local environmental permits, approvals, authorizations, or clearances, or in meeting or complying with any applicable federal, state or local environmental law, regulation, condition or requirements in connection with any activities authorized by this Access Permit. CHANGES IN ACCESS USE AND PERMIT VIOLATIONS 1. It is the responsibility of the property owner and permittee to ensure that the use of the access to the property is not in violation of the Code, permit terms and conditions or the Act. The terms and conditions of any permit are binding upon all assigns, successors -in -interest, heirs and occupants. If any significant changes are made or will be made in the use of the property which will affect access operation, traffic volume and or vehicle type, the permittee or property owner shall contact the local issuing authority or the Department to determine if a new access permit and modifications to the access are required. 2. When an access is constructed or used in violation of the Code, section 43-2-147(5)(c), C.R.S., of the Act applies. The Department or issuing authority may summarily suspend an access permit and immediately order closure of the access when its continued use presents an immediate threat to public health, welfare or safety. Summary suspension shall comply with article 4 of title 24, C.R.S. MAINTENANCE 1. The permittee, his or her heirs, successors -in -interest, assigns, and occupants of the property serviced by the access shall be responsible for meeting the terms and conditions of the permit, the repair and maintenance of the access beyond the edge of the roadway including any cattle guard and gate, and the removal or clearance of snow or ice upon the access even though deposited on the access in the course of Department snow removal operations. Within unincorporated areas the Department will keep access culverts clean as part of maintenance of the highway drainage system. However, the permittee is responsible for the repair and replacement of any access -related culverts within the right-of-way. Within incorporated areas, drainage responsibilities for municipalities are determined by statute and local ordinance. The Department will maintain the roadway including auxiliary lanes and shoulders, except in those cases where the access installation has failed due to improper access construction and/or failure to follow permit requirements and specifications in which case the permittee shall be responsible for such repair. Any significant repairs such as culvert replacement, resurfacing, or changes in design or specifications, requires authorization from the Department. 11. The Permittee is responsible for obtaining any necessary additional Federal, State and/or City/County permits Form 101, Page 3 STATE HIGHWAY ACCESS PERMIT 312039 Located on Highway 82A Frontage Road near MP 13.49 Left Issued to Larfarge West TERMS AND CONDITIONS June 21, 2012 1. This permitted access is only for the use and purpose stated in the Application and Permit. This Permit is issued in accordance with the State Highway Access Code (2 CCR 601-1), and is based in part upon the information submitted by the Permittee. Any subsequent relocation, reconstruction, or modifications to the access or changes in the traffic volume or traffic nature using the access shall be requested for by means of a new application. Any changes causing non-compliance with the Access Code may 'render this permit void, requiring a new permit. 2. The Permittee shall design and install a westbound right turn deceleration lane in accordance with Section 4 of the Access Code. 3. The Permittee shall design and install an eastbound left turn acceleration lane in accordance with Section 4 of the Access Code. 4. The traffic volume shall be 190 DHV. This is for Garfield County Road 103 also known as Crystal Springs Road. 5. All other highway intersection axillary lanes meet the standards of the Code. 6. The County Road 103 intersection with SH 82 shall be reconfigured to be as close to 90 degrees as possible. Median striping improvement for the center median on SH 82 shall be completed with this design. 7. Unofficial parking at the intersection of CR 103 and SH 82 shall be eliminated by landscaping or grading of the area. The parking area may remind if another government entity takes responsibility of maintaining of the parking area. This will need to be formalized by a written agreement. 8. The Powers' gravel pit operation access on SH 82 shall close and be reclaimed once access is open on County Road 103. All asphalt shall be removed and the site drainage and original vegetation shall be restored. 9. This access shall be constructed 25-40 feet wide. This access shall be constructed with turning radii to accommodate an AASHTO WB -67 turning radius. The turning radius shall be measured from the white line on the Hwy to the edge of the driveway. A drawing of the design vehicle turning template for the largest vehicle entering/exiting site will be required to ensure proper radius and lane widths. 10. The access shall be constructed perpendicular to the travel lanes of the State Highway for a minimum distance of 40 feet from the edge of roadway. Side slopes shall be at.a 4:1 slope on the roadway and at 6:1 to the approach. The driveway shall slope away from the highway at a -2% grade for the first 20 feet of driveway. This design shall be in conformance with section 4 of the State Highway Access Code, 2CCR 601-1. 11. The access shall be surfaced in accordance with Section 4.7 of the Access Code immediately upon completion of earthwork construction and prior to use. This access shall be hard surfaced in accordance with Section 4.7 of the Access Code a minimum distance of 50 feet from the traveled way or to the CDOT Right -of -Way. Where the hard surface is to abut existing pavement, the existing pavement shall be saw cut and removed a minimum of one foot back from the existing edge for bituminous, or until an acceptable existing cross slope is achieved. Surfacing shall meet the Department's specifications with minimum surfacing to be equal to or greater than existing highway conditions. STATE HIGHWAY ACCESS PERMIT 312039 Located on Highway 82A Frontage Road near MP 13.49 Left Issued to Larfarge West June 21, 2012 12. The Permittee shall provide a performance bond that will insure completion of the required highway and all related intersection improvements in conformance with all Department standards and specifications. The bond must be at least 110% of the estimated total highway construction cost and the bonding agency must be surety licensed to do business in the State of Colorado. A thorough Construction Cost Estimate sealed by a Colorado Registered Professional Engineer and a draft of the bond must be provided and approved by Department before acceptance of the final bond and before construction is approved to commence. 13. This permit replaces any and all additional access permits that may be in existence for this access. 14. A pre-desigri meeting is required prior to construction design. Required personnel for this meeting are: Professional Engineer of Record (i.e., the person who shall sign and seal the plan set), Design Engineer, and Permittee. Please contact Devin Drayton 970-683-6286 for scheduling this pre -design meeting. 15. A Notice to Proceed, CDOT Form 1265 is required before beginning the construction of the access or any activity within the highway right-of-way. To receive the Notice to Proceed the applicant shall submit a complete packet to CDOT with the following items: (a) A cover letter requesting a Notice to Proceed. (b) Certificate of Insurance Liability as per Section 2.3(11)(i) of the State Highway Access Code. (c) A certified Traffic Control Plan in accordance with Section 2.4(6) of the Access Code. The Traffic Control Plan shall provide accessibility features to accommodate all pedestrians including persons with disabilities for all pathways during construction. (d) Ten copies of Construction Plans Stamped (11"x 17" with a minimum scale of 1" = 50') by a Colorado Registered Professional Engineer in full compliance with the State Highway Access Code. (e) Signed and sealed Notice to Proceed Checklist. (f) Signed and Approved Performance Bond. (g) Signed and sealed Drainage Report or narrative. (h) Prior to the issuance of any Notice to Proceed, the applicant shall schedule a pre - construction meeting including but not limited to applicant, Engineer of Record, Construction Inspector, construction personnel, Permittee (if other than applicant), CDOT representative and Traffic Control Supervisor. (i) A construction schedule will be required at the pre -construction meeting. (j) Letter from Garfield County support of removing the parking area north of the CR 103/SH 82 Intersection. 16. No drainage from this site shall enter onto the State Highway travel lanes. The Permittee is required to maintain all drainage in excess of historical flows and time of concentration on site. All existing drainage structures shall be extended, modified or upgraded, as applicable, to accommodate all new construction and safety standards, in accordance with the Department's standard siecifications. 17. All materials, equipment, installation and construction within the State Highway ROW shall be in accordance with the latest edition of the following standard references as applicable: STATE HIGHWAY ACCESS PERMIT 312039 Located on Highway 82A Frontage Road near MP 13.49 Left Issued to Larfarge West 'June 21, 2012 (a) CDOT Materials Manual (b) CDOT Construction Manual (c) CDOT Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction, latest edition (d) CDOT Standard Special Provisions, as applicable to project (e) CDOT Standard Plans (M&S Standards) (f) AASHTO Roadside Design Guide 18. A new culvert may be required for this access. The drainage study will be used to size all culverts. As a minimum, an 18 -inch culvert with protective end treatments will be required. The culvert shall be kept free of blockage to maintain proper flow and drainage. 19. Open cuts, which are at least 4 inches in depth, within 30 feet of the edge of the State Highway traveled way, will not be left open at night, on weekends, or on holidays, or shall be protected with a suitable barrier per State and Federal Standards. 20. The Permittee is responsible for obtaining any necessary additional Federal, State and/or City/County permits or clearances required for construction of the access. Approval of this access permit does not constitute verification of this action by the Permittee. Permittee is also responsible for obtaining all necessary utility permits in addition to this access Permit. 21. All workers within the State Highway right of way shall comply with their employer's safety and health policies/procedures, and all applicable U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulations - including, but not limited to the applicable sections of 29 CFR Part 1910 - Occupational Safety and Health Standards and 29 CFR Part 1926 - Safety and Health Regulations for Construction. Personal protective equipment (e.g. head protection, footwear, high visibility apparel, safety glasses, hearing protection, respirators, gloves, etc.) shall be worn as appropriate for the work being performed, and as specified in regulation. 22. The Permittee is required to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines (ADAAG) that have been adopted by the U.S. Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board (Access Board), and incorporated by the U.S. Attorney General as a federal standard. These guidelines provide requirements for design and construction. The current Standards Plans and can be found on the Design and Construction Project Support web page at: http://www.dot.state.co.us/DesignSupport/, then click on Design Bulletins. 23. CDOT requires submission of SWMP plans on any projects where the area of CDOT ROW impacted exceeds one acre. 24. On all CDOT access permit projects where the developers are required to apply and obtain a CSP (Construction Storm Water Permit) from the respective regulatory agency, "The Permittee/Applicant is required to include the portion of CDOT Rights of Way to be impacted by the construction of the access within their Construction Storm Water Permit (CSP). A notice to proceed will not be issued until the Permittee/applicant provides CDOT region permit office with the proof of such inclusion on the developer's CSP. 25. It is the responsibility of the Permittee/applicant to determine which environmental clearances and/or regulations apply to the project, and to obtain any clearances that are required directly from the appropriate agency. Please refer to or request a copy of the "CDOT Environmental Clearance information Summary" for details. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS MAY RESULT IN SUSPENSION OR REVOCATION OF YOUR CDOT PERMIT, OR ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS BY OTHER AGENCIES. STATE HIGHWAY ACCESS PERMIT 312039 Located on Highway 82A Frontage Road near MP 13.49 Left Issued to Larfarge West June 21, 2012 • ALL discharges are subject to the provisions of the Colorado Water Quality Control Act and the Colorado Discharge Permit Regulations. Prohibited discharges include substances such as: wash water, paint, automotive fluids, solvents, oils or soaps. • Unless otherwise identified by CDOT or the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE) Water Quality Control Division (WQCD) as significant sources of pollutants to the waters of the State, the following discharges to storm water systems are .Allowed without a Colorado Discharge Permit System permit: landscape irrigation, diverted stream flows, uncontaminated ground water infiltration to separate storm sewers, discharges from potable water sources, foundation drains, air conditioning condensation, irrigation water, springs, footing drains; water line flushing, flows from ripaiian habitats and wetlands, and flow from fire fighting activities. However, con truction activities may require a Construction Stormwater Permit. Contact the CDOT Water Quality Program Manager at 303-757-9343. • ANY OTHER DISCHARGES may require Colorado Discharge Permit(s) or separate permits from CDPHE or the appropriate agency before work begins. For additional information and forms, go to the CDPHE website at: ,http://www.cdohe.state.co.us/wq/PermitsUnits/wqcdpmt.html. 26. Nothing in this permit shall prohibit the chief engineer from exercising the right granted in CRS 43-3-102 Including but not limited to restricting left hand turns by construction of physical medial separations. 27. A signed and approved temporary lease agreement is required if construction trailers are to be located on CDOT ROW during construction. 28. During access construction no construction personal vehicles will be permitted to park in the state highway right-of-way. 29. The access shall be completed in an expeditious and safe manner and shall be completed within 45 days from initiation of construction within State Highway right-of-way or in accordance with written concurrence of the Access Manager. All construction shall be completed i a single season. 30. All costs associated with any type of utility, work will be at the sole responsibility and cost of the Permittee sd at no cost to CDOT. 31. Any damago to present highway facilities including traffic control devices shall be repaired immediately at no cost to the Department and prior to continuing other work. 32. Any mud or' other material tracked or otherwise deposited on the roadway shall be removed daily or as r,rdered by the Department inspector. If mud is obvious condition during site constructio!'1, it is recommended that the contractor build a Stabilized Construction Entrance or Scrubber Pad at the intended construction access to aid in the removal of mud and debris from vehicle tires. The details of the Stabilized Construction Entrance are found in the M & S Standards Plan No. M-208-1. 33. A fully executed complete copy of this permit and the Notice to Proceed must be on the job site with the contractor at all times during the construction. Failure to comply with this or any other construction requirement may result in the immediate suspension of work by order of the Department inspector or the issuing authority. 34. All construction and inspection work must be under the direction of a Colorado Registered Professional Engineer. The PE's responsibilities include, but are not limited to: STATE HIGHWAY ACCESS PERMIT 312039 Located on Highway 82A Frontage Road near MP 13.49 Left Issued to Larfarge West June 21, 2012 (a) The PE shall evaluate compliance with plans and specifications with regard to the roadway improvements within the State right-of-way. The PE shall carefully monitor the contractor's compliance on all aspects of construction, including construction zone traffic control. (b) Engineering Certification: After inspection and before final acceptance, the Engineer shall certify to CDOT in writing that all inspections, materials, materials testing, and construction methods conform to the plans, specifications and purpose of design. Upon completion of the work, that responsible Engineer shall submit an "As Built" plans, showing in detail all approved construction changes, modification. 35. No work will be allowed at night, Saturdays, Sundays and legal holidays without prior authorization from the Department. The Department may also restrict work within the State Highway right-of-way during adverse weather conditions. 36. Areas of roadway and/or right-of-way disturbed during this installation shall be restored to their original conditions to insure proper strength and stability, drainage and erosion control. Restoration shall meet the Department's standard specifications for topsoil, fertilization, mulching, and re -seeding. Construction Completion & Final Acceptance 37. The Permittee shall construct all improvements stated on this permit prior to an use as allowed by this permit. The Permittee shall notify the Permit Manager by certified mail within 10 working days to request a final inspection. This request shall include signed and sealed certification that all materials and construction have been completed in accordance with all applicable Department Standards and Specifications; and that the access is constructed in conformance with the State Highway Access Code, 2 CCR 601-1, and the terms and conditions included in this permit. The engineer of record shall be present for this inspection. The access serviced by this permit may not be opened to traffic until the CDOT Access Manager provides written initial approval. 38. Following the final inspection, CDOT will prepare an Access Construction Inspection Summary Letter and send it to the applicant, Permittee, and engineer of record. If additional items are required to complete the access construction, a list of these items will be part of the access construction inspection summary letter. All required items and final as -built survey shall be completed within 30 days from receiving the Access Construction Summary Letter. The access serviced by this permit may not be opened to traffic until written approval has been given from the CDOT Access Manager. If all work appears to have been done in general close conformity with the above named permit, an initial acceptance letter will be sent to the Permittee and this access may be opened for traffic. 39. The 2 year warrantee period will begin when the initial acceptance letter is issued. In accordance with section 2.5(6) of the State Highway Access Code, if any construction element fails within two -years due to improper construction or material specifications, the Permittee shall be responsible for all repairs. Failure to make such repairs may result in suspension of the permit and closure of the access. The letter of final acceptance will be issued once the access has been inspected and is found to comply with all material and constru.%tion in accordance with all applicable Department Standards and Specifications approx;. 2 years after initial acceptance. COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Environmental Clearances Information Summary PURPOSE - This summary is intended to inform entities external to CDOT that may be entering the state highway right-of-way to perform work related to their own facilities (such as Utility, Special Use or Access Permittees), about some of the more commonly encountered environmental permits/clearances that may apply to their activities. This listing is not all-inclusive - additional environmental or cultural resource permits/clearances may be required in certain instances. Appropriate local, state and federal agencies should be contacted for additional information if there is any uncertainty about what permits/clearances are required for a specific activity. IMPORTANT — Please Review The Following Information Carefully — Failure to Comply With Regulatory Requirements May Result In Suspension or Revocation of Your CDOT Permit, Or Enforcement Actions By Other Agencies CLEARANCE CONTACTS - As indicated in the permit/clearance descriptions listed below, the following individuals or agencies may be contacted for additional information: • Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE): General Information - (303) 692-2035 Water Quality Control Division (WQCD): (303) 692-3500 Environmental Permitting Website htto:/Iwww.cdphe.state.co.us/permits.asp. • CDOT Water Quality' Program Manager: Rick Willard (303) 757-9343 htto:IIwww.coloradodot.info/programs/environmental/water- quality • CDOT Asbestos Project Manager: Theresa Santangelo-Dreiling, (303) 512-5524 • Colorado Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation: (303) 866-3395 • U.S. Army Corps of -ngineers, District Regulatory Offices: Omaha District (N -Colorado), Denver Office (303) 979-4120 htto://www.nwo.usace.army.mil/html/od-tlltri-lakes.html Sacramento Dist. Western CO), Grand Junction Office (970) 243-1199 http://www.sok.usace.army.mil/cespk-co/requlatory/ Albuquerque District (SE Colorado), Pueblo Reg. Office (719)-543-6915 http://www.spa.usace.army.millreq/ • CDOT Utilities, Special Use and Access Permitting: (303) 757-9654 http://www.dot.state.co.us/Permits/ Ecological Resources — Disturbance of wildlife shall be avoided to the maximum extent practicable. Entry into areas of known or suspected threatened or endangered species habitat will require special authorization from the CDOT permitting office. If any threatened or endangered species are encountered during the progress of the permitted work, work in the subject area shall be halted and the CDOT Regional Permitting Office and Region Planning and Environmental Manager shall be contacted immediately. Authorization must be provided by CDOT prior to the continuation of work. Information about threatened or endangered species may be obtained from the CDOT website, http://coloradodot.info/programs/environmental/wildlife/guidelines, or the Colorado Division of Wildlife website http:Nwildlife.state.co.usANildlifeSpecieslSpeciesOfConcern/. Additional guidance may be provided by the appropriate Region Planning and Environmental Manager (RPEM). Cultural Resources — The applicant must request a file search of the.permit area through the Colorado Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation (OAHP), Denver, to ascertain if historic or archaeological resources have previously been identified. Inventory of the permit area by a qualified cultural resources specialist may be necessary, per the recommendation of CDOT. If archaeological sites/artifacts or historic resources are known to exist prior to the initiation of the permitted work or are encountered as the project progresses, all work in the subject area shall be halted and the CDOT Regional Permitting Office and Region Planning and Environmental Manager shall be contacted immediately. Authorization must be provided by CDOT prior to the continuation of work. Additional guidance may be provided by the Regional Permitting Office and RPEM. Contact Information: Contact the OAHP for file search at (303) 866-3395. Paleontological Resources - The applicant must request a fossil locality file search through the University of Colorado Museum, Boulder, and the Denver Museum of Nature and Science to ascertain if paleontological resources have been previously identified. Inventory of the permit area by a qualified paleontologist may be necessary, per the recommendation of CDOT. If fossils are encountered during the permitted work, all work in the subject area shall be halted and the CDOT Regional Permitting Office and Region Planning and En ironmental Manager shall be contacted immediately. Authorization must be provided by CDOT prior to the continuation of work. Additional guidance may be provided by the Regional Permitting Office in the Permit Special Provisions. Contact Information: Contact the CDOT Paleontologist at (303) 757-9632. Hazardous Materials, Solid Waste - The Solid Wastes Disposal Sites and Facilities Act C.R.S. 30-20-100, et al, and Regulations Pertaining to Solid Waste;:Disposal Sites and Facilities (6 CCR 1007-2), prohibit solid waste disposal without an approved Certificate of Designation (a landfill hermit). The Colorado Hazardous Waste Act C.R.S. 25-15-301 et al, and the Colorado Hazardous Waste Regulations (6 CCR 100'.-3) prohibit the transfer, storage or disposal (TSD) of hazardous waste except at permitted TSD sites. There are no permitted landfillsfbr TSD sites within the State Highway Right of Way. Therefore, all solid or hazardous wastes that might be generated by the activities of entities entering the State Highway Right of Way must be removed from the ROW and disposed of at a permitted facility or designated collection point (e.g., for solid waste, a utility or construction company's own dumpster). If pre-existing solid waste or hazardous materials contamination (including oil or petroleum contaminated soil, asbestos, chemicals, mine tailings, etc.) is encountered during the performance of work, the permittee shall halt work in the affected area and immediately contact the CDOT Regional Permitting Office for direction as to how to proceed. Contact Info: Andy Flurkey, CDOT Hazardous Materials Project Manager, (303) 512-5520. Asbestos Containing Materials, Asbestos Contaminated Soil — All work on asbestos containing materials (ACM) must comply with the applicable requirements of the CDPHE Air Pollution Control Division's (APCD) Regulation 8. Disposal of ACM, and work done in asbestos -contaminated soil, must comply with the CDPHE Hazardous Materials and Waste Management Division's (HMWMD) Solid Waste Regulations. The application for any CDOT permit must specifically identify any ACM involved in the work for which authorization is being requested. Additional guidance or requirements may be specified in the permit special provisions. Contact Info: CDPHE APCD and HMWMD Regulations can be accessed via the CDPHE Environmental Permitting Website listed above. Additional information concerning clearance on CDOT projects is available from the CDOT Asbestos Project Manager (303) 512- 5519, or Theresa Santangelo-Dreiling, Property Management Supervisor (303) 512-5524. Environmental Clearances Information Summary Page 1 of 3 Colorado Department of Transportation December '10 Transportation of Hazardous Materials - No person may offer or accept a hazardous material for transportation in commerce unless that person is registered in conformance with the United States Department of Transportation regulations at 49 CFR, Part 171. The hazardous material must be properly classed, described, packaged, marked, labeled, and in condition for shipment as required or authorized by applicable requirements, or an exemption, approval or registration has been issued. Vehicles requiring a placard, must obtain authorization and a State HAZMAT Permit from the Colorado Public Utilities Commission. Contact Information: For authorization and more info call the Federal Motor Safety Carrier Administration, US DOT for inter- and intra -state HAZMAT Registration (303) 969-6748. Colorado Public Utilities Commission: (303) 894-2868. Discharge of Dredged or Fill Material — 404 Permits Administered Sy the U.S. Army Corps of Engine's, and Section 401 Water Quality Certifications Issued by the CDPHE WQCD - Corps of Engineers 404 Permits are requirecrfor the discharge of dredged or fill materials into waters of the United States, including wetlands. There are various types of 404;,Permits, including Nationwide Permits, which are issued for activities with relatively minor impacts. For example, there is a Nationwide Permit for Utility Line Activities (NWP #12). However, depending upon the specific circumstances, it is possible that either a'EGeneral" or "Individual" 404 permit would be required. If an Individual 404 Permit is required, Section 401 water quality certification from the CDPHE WQCD is also required. Contact the appropriate Corps District Regulatory Office for information about what type of'404 permit may be required (contact information above). Contact the CDPHE Water Quality Control Division at (303) 692-35041 Working on or in any stream or its bank - In order to protect and preserve the state's fish and wildlife resources from actions that may obstruct, diminish, destroy, change, modify, or vary a natural existing stream or its banks or tributaries,`•it may be necessary to obtain a Senate Bili 40 certification from the Colorado Department of Natural Resources. A stream is defined as 1) represented by a solid blue line on USGS 7.5' quadrangle maps; and/or 2) intermittent streams providing live water beneficial to fish and wildlife; and/or 3) segments of streams supporting 25% or more cover within 100 yards upstream or downstream of the project; and/or 4) segments of streams having wetlands present within 200 yards upstream or downstream of the project. The Colorado Division of Wildlife (CDOW) application, as per guidelines agreed upon by CDOT and CDOW, can be accessed at htt.://www.coloradodot. info/programs/environmentallwildlife/guidelines. Stormwater Construction Permit (SCP) and Stormwater Discharge From Industrial Facilities - Discharges of stormwater runoff from construction sites disturbing one acre or more - or certain types of industrial facilities, such as concrete batch plants - requires a CDPS Stormwater Construction Permit. Contact Information: For Utility/Special Use activities being performed in conjunction and coordination with a CDOT highway construction contract, please contact the CDOT Water Quality Program Manager at (303) 757- 9343. Otherwise, contact the CDPHE Water Quality Control Division at (303) 692-3500. Website: http://www.cdphe.state.co.us/wq/PermitsUnit/index.html. Construction Dewaterinq (Discharge or Infiltration) — Discharges of water encountered during excavation or work in wet areas may require a Construction Dewatering Discharge Permit. Contact Information: For Construction Dewatering Discharge Permits, contact the CDPHE WQCD at (303) 692-3500. For Dewatering Application and Instructions, see Section 3 at the CDPHE website: htto://www. cdphe.state. co. us/wu/Perm itsU nitlFORMSandApolications/Amsandformsnewpace. htm l Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Discharge Permit— Discharges from the storm sewer systems of larger municipalities, and from the CDOT highway drainage system that lies within those municipalities, are subject to MS4 Permits issued by the CDPHE WQCD. For facilities that lie within the boundaries of a municipality that is subject to an MS4 permit, the owner of such facility should contact the municipality regarding stormwater related clearances that may have been established under that municipality's MS4 permit. All discharges to the CDOT highway drainage system or within the Right of Wayi(ROW) must comply with the applicable provisions of the Colorado Water Quality Control Act and the Colorado Discharge Permit Regulations Permit # COS - 000005 (http://www.coloradodot.info/programs/environmental/water-quality/documents/CDOT%20MS4%20F ermit.doclview) and COR -030000 (http:/Iwww.cdphe.state.co.us/wq/PermitsUnitIPERMITs/SWpermitsrats/SWConatructionPErrrfit.pdf). Discharges are subject to inspection by CDOT and CDHPE. Contact the CDPHE Water Quality Control Division at (303) 692-3500 for a listing of municipalities required to obtain MS4 Permits, or go to http://www.cdphe.state.co.us/wcl/permitsunitiMS4/MS4Permittees.pdf. General Prohibition — Discharges - All discharges are subject to the provisions of the Colorado Water Quality Control Act and the Colorado Discharge Permit Regulations. Prohibited discharges include, but are not limited to, substances such as wash water, paint, automotive fluids, solvents, oils or soaps and sediment. Allowable non-stormwater discharges can be found at http:/Iwww.coloradodot.info/programs/environmental/water-quality/glossary.html#AllowableDischarge. Contact Information: Contact the CDOT Water Quality Program Manager at (303) 757-9343, or the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Water Quality Control Division at (303) 692-3500. General Authorization - Allowable Non-Stormwater Discharges - Unless otherwise identified by COOT or the WQCD as significant sources of pollutants to the waters of the State, the following discharges to stormwater systems are allowed without a Colorado Discharge Permit System permit: landscape irrigation, diverted stream flows, uncontaminated ground water infiltration to separate storm sewers, discharges from potable water sources, foundation drains, air conditioning condensation, irrigation water, uncontaminated springs, footing drains; water line flushing, flows from riparian habitats and wetlands, and flow from fire fighting activities. Contact Information: The CDOT Water Quality Program Manager or the CDPHE Water Quality Control Division (telephone #'s listed above). Erosion and Sediment Control Practices - For activities requiring a Stormwater Construction Permit, erosion control requirements will be specified through that permit. In those situations where a stormwater permit is not required, all reasonable measures should be taken in order to minimize erosion and sedimentation according to CDOT 208 specifications. In either case, the CDOT Erosion Control and Stormwater Quality Guide (most recent version) should be used to design erosion controls andto restore disturbed vegetation. Contact Information: The CDOT Erosion Control and Stormwater Quality Guide may be obtained from the Bid Plans Office at (303) 757-9313 or from: http://www.dot.state.co.us/environmental/envWaterQual/wcims4.asp Error! Hyperlink reference not valid. Disposal of Drilling Fluids - Drilling fluids used in operations such as Horizontal Directional Drilling may beclassified as "discharges" or "solid wastes", and in general, should be pumped or vacuumed from the construction area, removed from the State Highway Right of Way, and disposed of at permitted facilities that specifically accept such wastes. Disposal of drilling fluids into storm drains, storm Environmental Clearances Information Summary Page 2of3 Cglorado Department of Transporyation December '10 sewers, roadside ditches or any other type of man-made or natural waterway is prohibited by Water Quality Control and/or Solid Waste regulations. Small quantities of drilling fluid solids (less than 1 cubic yard of solids) may be left on-site after either being separated from fluids or after infiltration of the water, provided: 1) the drilling fluid consists of only water and bentonite clay, or, if required for proper drilling properties, small quantities of polymer additives that are approved for use in drinking water well drilling; 2) the solids are fully contained in a pit, and are not likely to pose a nuisance to future work in the area, 3) the solids are covered and the area restored as required. by CDOT permit requirements (Utility, Special Use, or Access Permits, etc.). Contact information: Contact the CDOT / CDPHE Liaison or CDOT Water Quality Program Manager. Concrete Washout -Waste generated from concrete activities shall NOT be allowed to flow into the drainage ways, inlets, receiving waters, or in the CDOT IOW. Concrete waste shall be placed in a temporary concrete washout facility and must be located a minimum of 50 feet from state waters, drainageways, and inlets. Concrete washout shall only be performed as specified by the CDOT Environmental Program dnd shall be in accordance to CDOT specifications and guidelines. Contact !nformation: Contact the CDOT Water Quality Program Manager at (303) 757-9343. Website: htto://www.coloradodot.info/programs/environmental/water- quality/revised-m-standards; refer to the link Revision of Sections 101, 107, 208, 213 and 620 Water Quality Control One or More Acres of Disturbance for additional guidance. Spill Reporting - Spills shall be contained and cleaned up as soon as possible. Spills shall NOT be washed down into the storm drain or buried. All spills shall be reported to the CDOT Illicit Discharge Hotline at (303) 512-4446 (4H20), as well as the Regional Permitting Office and Regional Maintenance Supervisor. Spills on highways, into waterways, any spill in the highway right-of-way exceeding 25 gallons, or that may otherwise present an immediate danger to the public shall be reported by calling 911, and shall also be reported to the CDPHE at 1-877-518-5608. About This Form - Questions or comments about this Information Summary may be directed to Alex Karami, CDOT Safety & Traffic Engineering, Utilities Unit, at (303) 757-9841, mailto:alex.karami@dot.state.co.us. , Environmental Clearances Information Summary }E` Page 3 of 3 Colorado Department of Transportation December '10 Contractors Storage Yard Application 12015 Drainage Study (attached) 251 Page DRAINAGE STUDY FOR POWERS PIT CONCRETE BATCH PLANT COMP PLAN AMENDMENT Garfield County, Colorado Prepared by: Sopris Engineering, LLC 502 Main Street Suite A3 Carbondale, Colorado 81623 SE Project Number:11016 June 24, 2011 Step anie 0. Helfenbein E.I Yancy Nichol, P.E. Master Drainage Study— Powers Pit Concrete Batch Plant - SE Project No, 11016 Page2 June 24, 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION & PURPOSE 3 2.0 DESIGN POINTS 3 3.0 EXISTING DRAINAGE CONDITION AND FEATURES 3.1 Onsite Drainage 3-4 3.2 Offsite Drainage 4 3.3 Existing Basin Descriptions 4 4.0 DEVELOPED DRAINAGE CONDITION AND FEATURES 4.1 Developed Sites 4-5 4.2 Stormwater Detention 5-6 5.0 ANALYSIS METHODS AND ASSUMPTIONS 5.1 Rainfall 6 5.2 Time of Concentration... 6 5.3 Runoff Curve Number 6 6.0 DRAINAGE FACILITY MAINTENANCE 6 7.0 SUMMARY 6 ATTACHMENTS Exhibit 1 Exhibit 2 Appendix A Pre Development Drainage Basins Post Development Drainage Plan/Basins Supporting documentation and calculations. 502 Main Street • Suite A3 • Carbondale, CO 81623 • (970) 704-0311 • Fax (970) 704-0313 SOPRIS ENGINEERING •LLC civil consultants Master Drainage Study— Powers Pit Concrete Batch Plant - SE Project No. 11016 Page3 June 24, 2011 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE The Powers Pit is located north east of Carbondale, Colorado, on the north side of State Highway 82 in Garfield County, Colorado. The entire property consists of approximately 453 acres. Of that area, approximately 68.5 acres is currently leased to LaFarge for mining and batch plant operations while the remaining property is developed as rural residential. The purpose of the drainage study is: • To identify the existing drainage flows and patterns to and across the subject site. • To estimate stormwater runoff rates that may be expected through the additional development of the project. To determine the volume of stormwater detention that will be necessary to maintain the existing peak runoff and stormwater volume of the project and provide a safe routing of stormwater to the detention or retention areas. • To comply with the drainage standards for the Garfield County Unified Land Use Resolution of 2008 Section 7-206. Sopris Engineering, LLC (SE) has analyzed the project's impacts and has designed drainage detention structures to detain the entire 100 -year storm. The appendices located in the back of this report contain all supporting calculations associated with this analysis. 2.0 DESIGN POINTS The existing site has two "'release" points, which SE is referring to as Design Points (DP). The DPs are used to describe both the existing and developed drainage conditions. The developed site has been designed to not release any stormwater as the terrain prohibits the release of any stormwater. The design points and the existing and developed basins associated with them are further described below. DESIGN POINT 1 -DPI is located at the western portion of the leased site. The existing basin which contributes to the flows at this DP is Ex -Basin 1. When developed, P -Basin 1 will flow to this DP. With development, there are no changes to this basin. DESIGN POINT 2-DP2 is located at the existing detention pond. The existing basin which contributes flows at this DP is Ex -Basin 2. When developed, P -Basins 2-5 will contribute flows to this DP. Since the site has been mined and reclaimed, the site does not have a real "release" point for the majority of the leased site as the grades are much lower than Highway 82, water cannot physically leave the site. 3.0 EXISTING DRAINAGE CONDITION AND FEATURES 3.1 Onsite Drainage The site consists of 62.16 acres. The site has recently been reclaimed with slopes on the west, north and east of 3:1 and gentle slopes southwest across the floor of 1-3%. A 210,000 CF detention pond exists in the western portion of the site which collects all on site drainage. 502 Main Street • Suite A3 • Carbondale, CO 81623 • (970) 704-0311 • Fax (970) 704-0313 SOPRIS ENGINEERING • LLC civil consultants Master Drainage Study- Powers Pit Concrete Batch Plant - SE Project No. 11016 Page4 June 24, 2011 3.2 Offsite Drainage Since the site has been reclaimed, no offsite drainage enters the site. It is intercepted by irrigation ditches on the northern portion of the project site. 3.3 Existing Basin Description There are two existing drainage basins, 1 and 2 and they are shown on Exhibit 1: Existing Drainage Basins. The two drainage basins contribute to two different design points which correlate with the developed drainage basins design points. The design points associated with the existing basins are further described below: DESIGN POINT1: Existing Basin 1 contributes flows to DP1. EX Basin 1 is the westernmost drainage and contains 2.0 acres. This basin contributes to Design Point 1. The runoff from this basin flows into HWY 82 right-of-way drainage. DESIGN POINT2: Existing Basin 2 contributes flows to DP2. ➢ EX Basin 2 is the remainder of the project site and consists of 6055 acres. This basin contributes to Design Point 2. The runoff from this basin flows into an existing swale around the perimeter of the floor and west into an existing detention pond. TABLE A: EXISTING DRAINAGE SUMMARY BASIN ID DESIGN POINT AREA (acres) WEIGHTED CN TIME OF CONCENTRATION (min) EX 25 YEAR PEAK RUNOFF (cfs) EX 100 YR PEAK RUNOFF (cfs) EX 1 DP1 2 69 10 0.56 1.05 TOTAL DP 1 0.56 1.05 EX 2 DP2 60.55 72 24.19 17.41 29.86 TOTAL DP2 17.41 29.86 Refer to Appendix A for a summary of existing drainage basin calculations. 4.0 DEVELOPED DRAINAGE CONDITION AND FEATURES 4.1 Developed Site The proposed drainage concept for the entire project includes planned drainage facilities to manage stormwater runoff from the site. A combination of drainage swales and a storm drain network is proposed to route runoff from the roadways, parking areas and building roofs to one detention area. Runoff from the paved areas will drain to drainage swales which drain to the detention area in the western portion of the site. Curve numbers were assigned to each basin based on the anticipated developed land use, being conservative and assuming that the entire floor, exclusive of the drainage swales and detention pond, will be impervious. The minimum time of concentration for the developed sub basins was assumed to be 10 minutes. The developed site is designed to detain the entire 100 - year, 24-hour storm as the water cannot physically leave the site. Refer to Exhibit -2: Post Development Drainage Plan for a map that illustrates the delineation of each of these developed sub- basins. A total of 5 drainage basins from development occur and contribute to one of the two design points. To simplify the description of the developed basins, the descriptions are per design point, each of which includes several proposed basins. The developed basins and design points are shown on Exhibit 2 and are further described below. 502 Main Street • Suite A3 • Carbondale, CO 81623 • (970) 704-0311 • Fax (970) 704-0313 SOPRIS ENGINEERING • LLC civil consultants Master Drainage Study- Powers Pit Concrete Batch Plant - SE Project No. 11016 Pages ,lune 24, 2011 DESIGN POINT 1: Developed Basin 1 contributes flows to this design point. Developed Basin 1 is the westernmost drainage and contains 2 acres. There is no proposed development within this basin, therefore no detention is proposed within this basin and no storm infrastructure is proposed within the basin. It will continue to flow to the drainage facilities within Hwy 82. DESIGN POINT 2: Developed Basin 2-5 contribute flows to this design point. Developed Basins 2-5 encompass the remainder of the project site and consist of a total of 60.55 acres. We have assumed that the entire floor, exclusive of the drainage swales and detention pond, will be impervious as we do not have a development plan at this time. We have not proposed any stormwater infrastructure at this time and instead, propose that any confined drainage will infiltrate. However, the detention pond on the western portion of the project site has been designed to, at some point, accept and detain all on-site drainage. Table B summarizes the developed onsite sub basin data and calculations for the 25 and 100 -year storm events. Appendix A contains supporting calculations for the developed on site basins. TABLE B: DEVELOPED DRAINAGE SUMMARY BASIN ID DESIGN POINT AREA (acres) WEIGHTED CN TIME OF CONCENTRATION (min) POST 25 YEAR PEAK RUNOFF (cfs) POST 100 YR PEAK RUNOFF (cfs) P1 DP1 2 69 0:10:00 0.56 1.05 TOTAL DP1 0.56 1.05 P2 DP2 43.62 77 0:22:01 23.08 34.21 P3 DP2 6.9 86 0:10:00 9.67 12.75 P4 DP3 9.73 84 0:10:00 11.57 15.71 P5 DP4 0.3 98 0:10:00 0.73 0.87 TOTAL DP2 45.05 63.54 4.2 Stormwater Detention Garfield County requires that the rate of runoff from the developed site shall not exceed the pre -development runoff rate of runoff for the 25-eyear storm event. However, as is noted in section 4.1 above, due to the existing terrain, water cannot physically leave the site, it has therefore been designed to detain the entire 100 -year storm. The peak runoffs for the existing and developed storms were compared using the SCS hydrograph method to determine the required storage volume. Using the StormNet program, a required volume for the developed drainage sub areas was calculated and was used to size the proposed detention pond to ensure that the existing 210,000 CF detention pond is sufficient. As is mentioned above, the site was designed based upon two design points, which are the existing "release" points of the site. Only one of the two design points, design point 2, is required to have detention associated with it. A summary of the required detention volume for design point 2 and the attenuated peak flow leaving the site is included in Table C below. 502 Main Street • Suite A3 • Carbondale, CO 81623 • (970) 704-0311 • Fax (970) 704-0313 SOPRIS ENGINEERING • LLC civil consultants Master Drainage Study— Powers Pit Concrete Batch Plant - SE Project No. 11016 Page6 June 24, 2011 TABLE C: REQUIRED STORMWATER DETENTION SUMMARY DESIGN POINT # POND # EX BASINS EX 100 YEAR PEAK RUNOFF (cfs) DEVELOPED BASINS POST 100 YEAR PEAK RUNOFF (cfs) Q out (cfs) REQUIRED STORAGE VOLUME (CF) PROVIDED STORAGE VOLUME (CF) POND DEPTH (FT) 2 1 2 29.86 2-5 63.54 0 206,000 210,000.00 12 5.0 ANALYSIS METHODS AND ASSUMPTIONS The peak runoff rates for the basins were analyzed for the 25 year and the 100 year storm using the Soil Conservation Service (SCS) TR -55 method. All calculations and analysis were accomplished using StormNet software. 5.1 Rainfall As stated above, the SCS Type II Distribution is applicable to this region. Two design storms were utilized: 25- year/24 —hour and the 100-year/24-hour storms. Precipitation data for the site was taken from the NOAA atlas rainfall maps for Colorado. 5.2 Time of Concentration Time of Concentration calculations were performed using the TR -55 method. Hydraulic routing of sub basins was calculated using hydrodynamic link routing. A minimum time of concentration for the on-site drainage of 10 - minutes was utilized. 5.3 Runoff Curve Number Drainage basin soil information was obtained from the Natural Resource Conservation Service (MRCS) soil survey to determine the curve number. The two major determinants of the curve number (CN) are hydrologic soil group and cover type. The soils on site are classified as type "8" and type "D" while the curve numbers vary from 69 to 98, with the higher curve numbers being the least permeable. 6.0 DRAINAGE FACILITY MAINTENANCE Stormwater maintenance tasks will include checking and cleaning out culverts, inlets and outlet structures of any debris or sediment accumulation as well as maintaining any vegetation in roadside swales. The detention pond shall be monitored for any sediment loading within the ponds themselves as well as the outlet structures. Maintenance of surrounding landscaping/vegetation may also be required after major storm events. Final construction stages of work must follow a complete landscaping and ground covering task to permanently re - vegetate and cover bare grounds that will remain open space to avoid long-term soil erosion. This effort will reduce the risk of unnecessary clogging and failure of the drainage system. 7.0 SUMMARY The results from this drainage study suggest that no long-term, adverse impacts to drainage are anticipated with the development of the Powers Pit. Although onsite peak rates will increase with development, runoff from the drainage basins will drain to the detention areas and drywells via a storm drain distribution system and will be released at pre -development rates. Detention is provided for the anticipated stormwatervolume increase upon development. 502 Main Street • Suite A3 • Carbondale, CO 81623 • (970) 704-0311 • Fax (970) 704-0313 SOPRIS ENGINEERING LLC civil consultants Appendix A 11016-pre-25.txt BOSS International StormNET® - Version 4.19.3 (Build 221) **************** Analysis Options **************** Flow Units cfs Subbasin Hydrograph MethodSCS TR -55 Time of Concentration SCS TR -55 Pond Exfiltration None Starting Date MAY -11-2011 00:00:00 Ending Date MAY -I2 -201I 00:06:00 Report Time Step 00:05:00 ************* Element Count ************* Number of rain gages Number of subbasins Number of nodes Number of links 2 2 2 0 *******ow******* Raingage Summary **************** Gage ID Data Source Data Type Interval hours 100 -year 25 -year Subbasin Summary o*************** Subbasin ID 100 -YEAR 25 -YEAR Total Area acres EX -1 ************ Node Summary ************ Node ID 2.00 60.55 Element Type CUMULATIVE 0.10 CUMULATIVE 0'I0 Invert Elevation ft Maximum Elev. ft Ponded External Area Inflow ft2 Out -1 Out -2 OUTFALL OUTFALL **«*********************** Runoff Quantity Continuity ************************** Total Precipitation Surface Runoff 0.00 0.00 Volume acre -ft 11.620 0.195 Page 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Depth inches 2.229 0.037 11016-pre-25.txt Continuity Error (%) -0.000 ************************** Flow Routing Continuity ************************** volume acre -ft volume mgallons External Inflow 0.000 0.000 External Outflow 1.953 0.637 Initial Stored volume 0.000 0.000 Final Stored volume 0.000 0.000 Continuity Error (%) 0.000 ****************************************** Composite Curve Number Computations Report ****************************************** Subbasin Ex -1 Soil/Surface Description CN Area Soil (acres) Group ---- Pasture, grassland, or range, Fair 69.00 Composite Area & weighted CN 69.00 Subbasin Ex -2 Soil/Surface Description CN 2.00 B 2.00 Area Soil (acres) Group - 60.55 72.00 Composite Area & weighted CN 60.55 72.00 *************************************************** SCS TR -55 Time of Concentration Computations Report *************************************************** Sheet Flow Equation Tc = (0.007 * ((n * Lf)A0.8)) / ((PA0.5) * (sfA0.4)) where: Tc = Time of Concentration (hrs) n = Manning's Roughness Lf = Flow Length (ft) P = 2 yr, 24 hr Rainfall (inches) Sf = Slope (ft/ft) Page 2 11016-pre-25.txt Shallow Concentrated Flow Equation v = 16.1345 (SfA0.5) (unpaved surface) v = 20.3282 :; (SfA0.5) (paved surface) v = 15.0 (SfA0.5) (grassed waterway surface) v = 10.0 (SfA0.5) (nearly bare & untilled surface) v = 9.0 (SfA0.5) (cultivated straight rows surface) v = 7.0 :; (SfA0.5) (short grass pasture surface) v = 5.0 (SfA0.5) (woodland surface) v = 2.5 :; (SfA0.5) (forest w/heavy litter surface) Tc = (Lf / v) / (3600 sec/hr) where: Tc = Time of Concentration (hrs) Lf = Flow Length (ft) v = velocity (ft/sec) Sf = Slope (ft/ft) Channel Flow Equation v = (1.49 * (RA(2/3)) * (SfA0.5)) / n R = Aq / wp Tc = (Lf / v) / (3600 sec/hr) where: Tc = Time of Concentration (hrs) Lf = Flow Length (ft) R = Hydraulic Radius (ft) Aq = Flow Area (ft2) wp = wetted Perimeter (ft) v = velocity (ft/sec) Sf = Slope (ft/ft) n = Manning's Roughness Subbasin EX -1 User -Defined TOC override (minutes): 10.00 Subbasin EX -2 Sheet Flow Computations Flowpath c Manning's Roughness: 0.00 Flow Length (ft): 0.00 Slope (%): 0.00 2 yr, 24 hr Rainfall (in): 1.20 velocity (ft/sec): 0.00 Computed Flow Time (minutes): Page 3 Flowpath A 0.15 211.00 9.00 1.20 0.22 15.93 Flowpath B 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.20 0.00 0.00 11016-pre-25.txt 0.00 Shallow Concentrated Flow Computations Flowpath C Flow Length (ft): 0.00 Slope (%): 0.00 Surface Type: Unpaved velocity (ft/sec): 0.00 Computed Flow Time (minutes): 0.00 Channel Flow Computations Flowpath C Manning's Roughness: 0.00 Flow Length (ft): 0.00 Channel Slope (%): 0.00 Cross Section Area (ft2): 0.00 wetted Perimeter (ft): 0.00 velocity (ft/sec): 0.00 Computed Flow Time (minutes): 0.00 Flowpath A Flowpath B 504.00 0.00 25.00 0.00 Grass pasture Unpaved 3.50 0.00 2.40 0.00 Flowpath A 0.03 2187.00 2.00 5.00 6.00 6.22 5.86 Flowpath B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total TOC (minutes): 24.19 Subbasin Runoff Summary Subbasin Total Total Peak weighted Time of ID Precip Runoff Runoff Curve Concentration in in cfs Number days hh:mm:ss EX -1 EX -2 2.200 0.292 0.560 69.000 0 00:10:00 2.200 0.381 17.410 72.000 0 00:24:11 System 2.200 0.378 17.97 Analysis begun on: Tue Jun 28 10:11:11 2011 Analysis ended on: Tue Jun 28 10:11:14 2011 Total elapsed time: 00:00:03 Page 4 II0I6-pre-I00.txt BOSS International StnrmNET6 - Version 4.19.3 (Build 221) **************** Analysis Options **************** Flow Units cfs Subbasin Hydrograph MethodSCS TR -55 Time of Concentration SCS TR -55 Pond Exfiltration None Starting Date MAY -11-2011 00:00:00 Ending Date MAY -I2 -201I 00:06:00 Report Time Step 00:05:00 ************* Element Count ************* Number of rain gages Number of subbasins Number of nodes Number of links 2 2 2 0 *******ow******* Raingage Summary **************** Gage ID Data Source Data Type Interval hours 100 -year 25 -year ******»********* Subbasin Summary **************** Subbasin ID 100 -YEAR 25 -YEAR Total Area acres EX -1 ************ Node Summary ************ Node ID 2.00 60.55 Element Type CUMULATIVE 0.10 CUMULATIVE 0'I0 Invert Elevation ft Maximum Elev. ft Ponded External Area Inflow ft2 Out -1 Out -2 OUTFALL OUTFALL *******»****************** Runoff Quantity Continuity ****************«********* Total Precipitation Surface Runoff 0.00 0.00 Volume acre -ft 13.732 0.299 Page 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Depth inches 2.634 0.057 11016-pre-100.txt Continuity Error (%) -0.000 ************************** Flow Routing Continuity ************************** volume acre -ft volume mgallons External Inflow 0.000 0.000 External Outflow 2.989 0.974 Initial Stored volume 0.000 0.000 Final Stored volume 0.000 0.000 Continuity Error (%) 0.000 ****************************************** Composite Curve Number Computations Report ****************************************** Subbasin Ex -1 Soil/Surface Description CN Area (acres) Soil Group ---- Pasture, grassland, or range, Fair 69.00 Composite Area & weighted CN 69.00 Subbasin Ex -2 Soil/Surface Description CN 2.00 B 2.00 Area Soil (acres) Group - 60.55 72.00 Composite Area & weighted CN 60.55 72.00 *************************************************** SCS TR -55 Time of Concentration Computations Report *************************************************** Sheet Flow Equation Tc = (0.007 * ((n * Lf)A0.8)) / ((PA0.5) * (sfA0.4)) where: Tc = Time of Concentration (hrs) n = Manning's Roughness Lf = Flow Length (ft) P = 2 yr, 24 hr Rainfall (inches) Sf = Slope (ft/ft) Page 2 11016-pre-100.txt Shallow Concentrated Flow Equation v = 16.1345 (sfA0.5) (unpaved surface) v = 20.3282 :; (sfA0.5) (paved surface) v = 15.0 (sfA0.5) (grassed waterway surface) v = 10.0 (sfA0.5) (nearly bare & untilled surface) v = 9.0 (sfA0.5) (cultivated straight rows surface) v = 7.0 ;; (sfA0.5) (short grass pasture surface) v = 5.0 (sfA0.5) (woodland surface) v = 2.5 :; (sfA0.5) (forest w/heavy litter surface) Tc = (Lf / v) / (3600 sec/hr) where: Tc = Time of Concentration (hrs) Lf = Flow Length (ft) v = velocity (ft/sec) Sf = Slope (ft/ft) Channel Flow Equation v = (1.49 * (RA(2/3)) * (sfA0.5)) / n R = Aq / wp Tc = (Lf / v) / (3600 sec/hr) where: Tc = Time of Concentration (hrs) Lf = Flow Length (ft) R = Hydraulic Radius (ft) Aq = Flow Area (ft2) wp = wetted Perimeter (ft) v = velocity (ft/sec) sf = slope (ft/ft) n = Mannings Roughness Subbasin Ex -1 user -Defined TOC override (minutes): 10.00 Subbasin Ex -2 Sheet Flow Computations Flowpath c Manning's Roughness: 0.00 Flow Length (ft): 0.00 Slope (%): 0.00 2 yr, 24 hr Rainfall (in): 1.20 velocity (ft/sec): 0.00 Computed Flow Time (minutes): Page 3 Flowpath A 0.15 211.00 9.00 1.20 0.22 15.93 Flowpath B 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.20 0.00 0.00 11016-pre-100.txt 0.00 Shallow Concentrated Flow Computations Flowpath C Flow Length (ft): 0.00 Slope (%): 0.00 Surface Type: Unpaved velocity (ft/sec): 0.00 Computed Flow Time (minutes): 0.00 Channel Flow Computations Flowpath C Manning's Roughness: 0.00 Flow Length (ft): 0.00 Channel Slope (%): 0.00 Cross Section Area (ft2): 0.00 wetted Perimeter (ft): 0.00 velocity (ft/sec): 0.00 Computed Flow Time (minutes): 0.00 Flowpath A Flowpath B 504.00 0.00 25.00 0.00 Grass pasture Unpaved 3.50 0.00 2.40 0.00 Flowpath A 0.03 2187.00 2.00 5.00 6.00 6.22 5.86 Flowpath B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total TOC (minutes): 24.19 Subbasin Runoff Summary Subbasin Total Total Peak weighted Time of ID Precip Runoff Runoff Curve Concentration in in cfs Number days hh:mm:ss EX -1 EX -2 2.600 0.467 1.050 69.000 0 00:10:00 2.600 0.581 29.860 72.000 0 00:24:11 System 2.600 0.577 30.91 Analysis begun on: Tue Jun 28 10:13:24 2011 Analysis ended on: Tue Jun 28 10:13:27 2011 Total elapsed time: 00:00:03 Page 4 II0I6-pnst-25.txt BOSS International StnrmNET6 - Version 4.19.3 (Build 221) **************** Analysis Options **************** Flow Units Subbasin Hydrograph Method Time of Concentration Link Routing Method Pond Exfiltration Starting Date Ending Date Report Time Step ************* Element Count ************* Number of rain gages Number of subbasins Number of nodes Number of links cfs SCS TR -55 SCS TR -55 Hydrodynamic None MAY -II -201I 00:00:00 MAY -I2 -201I 00:06:00 00:05:00 2 5 4 3 **************** Raingage Summary **************** Gage ID Data Source Data Type Interval hours 100 -YEAR 25 -year **************** Subbasin Summary **************** Subbasin ID 100 -YEAR 25 -year Total Area acres P-1 P-2 P-3 P-4 P-5 ************ Node Summary ************ Node ID 2.00 43.62 6.90 9.73 0.30 Element Type CUMULATIVE CUMULATIVE Invert Elevation ft Maximum Elev' ft 0.10 0.10 Ponded External Area Inflow ft2 Jun -4 Out -1 Out -3 Jun -1 JUNCTION OUTFALL OUTFALL STORAGE 6179.50 6200.00 6179.00 6180.00 Page 1 6183.00 6200.00 6180.50 6186.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ************ Link Summary ************ Link Manning's ID Roughness From Node 11016-post-25.txt To Node Element Length Slope Type ft % Con -1 Jun -1 Jun -4 CONDUIT 0.0150 Con -4 Jun -4 Out -3 CONDUIT 0.0150 Reg -1 Jun -1 Jun -4 ORIFICE ********************* Cross Section Summary ********************* 135.1 4.8175 66.6 0.7512 Link Shape Depth/ width No. of Cross Full Flow Design ID Diameter Barrels Sectional Hydraulic Flow Radius ft Capacity cfs Area ft ft ft2 Con -1 0.38 Con -4 0.38 CIRCULAR 19.98 CIRCULAR 7.89 ************************** Runoff Quantity Continuity ************************** 1.50 1.50 1 1.77 1.50 1.50 1 1.77 Volume Depth acre -ft inches Total Precipitation 11.620 Surface Runoff 0.345 Continuity Error (%) -0.000 ************************** Flow Routing Continuity ************************** Volume acre -ft 2.229 0.066 Volume Mgallons External Inflow 0.000 0.000 External Outflow 3.360 1.095 Initial Stored volume 0.000 0.000 Final Stored volume 0.088 0.029 Continuity Error (%) 0.001 ****************************************** Composite Curve Number Computations Report ****************************************** Subbasin P-1 Page 2 11016-post-25.txt Soil/Surface Description CN Area (acres) Soil Group Pasture, grassland, or range, Fair 69.00 Composite Area & weighted CN 69.00 Subbasin P-2 Soil/Surface Description CN 2.00 B 2.00 Area (acres) Soil Group 98.00 69.00 Composite Area & weighted CN 77.36 Subbasin P-3 Soil/Surface Description CN 12.57 31.05 43.62 Area (acres) Soil Group 98.00 69.00 Composite Area & weighted CN 86.15 Subbasin P-4 Soil/Surface Description CN 4.08 2.82 6.90 Area (acres) Soil Group 98.00 69.00 Composite Area & weighted CN 83.57 Subbasin P-5 Page 3 4.89 4.84 9.73 Area Soil 11016-post-25.txt Soil/Surface Description (acres) Group CN - 0.30 98.00 Composite Area & weighted CN 0.30 98.00 SCS TR -55 Time of Concentration Computations Report Sheet Flow Equation Tc = (0.007 ., ((n ., Lf)A0.8)) / ((PA0.5) * (SfA0.4)) where: Tc = Time of Concentration (hrs) n = Manning's Roughness Lf = Flow Length (ft) P = 2 yr, 24 hr Rainfall (inches) Sf = Slope (ft/ft) Shallow Concentrated Flow Equation v = 16.1345 (SfA0.5) (unpaved surface) v = 20.3282 ;; (SfA0.5) (paved surface) v = 15.0 (SfA0.5) (grassed waterway surface) v = 10.0 :; (SfA0.5) (nearly bare & untilled surface) v = 9.0 (SfA0.5) (cultivated straight rows surface) v = 7.0 :; (SfA0.5) (short grass pasture surface) v = 5.0 (SfA0.5) (woodland surface) V = 2.5 :; (SfA0.5) (forest w/heavy litter surface) Tc = (Lf / v) / (3600 sec/hr) where: Tc = Time of Concentration (hrs) Lf = Flow Length (ft) v = velocity (ft/sec) Sf = Slope (ft/ft) Channel Flow Equation v = (1.49 * (RA(2/3)) (SfA0.5)) / n R = Aq / Wp Tc = (Lf / v) / (3600 sec/hr) where: Tc = Time of Concentration (hrs) Lf = Flow Length (ft) R = Hydraulic Radius (ft) Aq = Flow Area (ft2) wp = wetted Perimeter (ft) v = velocity (ft/sec) Page 4 Sf = Slope (ft/ft) n = Manning's Roughness 11016-post-25.txt Subbasin P-1 User -Defined TOC override (minutes): 10.00 Subbasin P-2 Sheet Flow Computations Subarea C Manning's Roughness: 0.00 Flow Length (ft): 0.00 Slope (%): 0.00 2 yr, 24 hr Rainfall (in): 1.20 velocity (ft/sec): 0.00 Computed Flow Time (minutes): 0.00 Shallow Concentrated Flow Computations Subarea C Flow Length (ft): 0.00 Slope (%): 0.00 Surface Type: unpaved velocity (ft/sec): 0.00 Computed Flow Time (minutes): 0.00 Channel Flow Computations Subarea C Manning's Roughness: 0.00 Flow Length (ft): 0.00 Channel slope (%): 0.00 Cross Section Area (ft2): 0.00 wetted Perimeter (ft): 0.00 velocity (ft/sec): 0.00 Computed Flow Time (minutes): 0.00 Page 5 Subarea A 0.15 211.00 9.00 1.20 0.22 15.93 Subarea B 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.20 0.00 0.00 Subarea A Subarea B 504.00 0.00 25.00 0.00 Grass pasture Unpaved 3.50 0.00 2.40 0.00 Subarea A 0.03 1686.00 3.00 5.00 6.00 7.62 3.69 Subarea B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11016-post-25.txt Total TOC (minutes): 22.02 Subbasin P-3 User -Defined TOC override (minutes): 10.00 Subbasin P-4 User -Defined TOC override (minutes): 10.00 Subbasin P-5 User -Defined TOC override (minutes): 10.00 Subbasin Runoff Summary Subbasin Total Total Peak weighted Time of ID Precip Runoff Runoff Curve Concentration in in cfs Number days hh:mm:ss P-1 2.200 0.292 0.56 69.000 0 00:10:00 P-2 2.200 0.574 23.08 77.360 0 00:22:01 P-3 2.200 1.012 9.670 86.150 0 00:10:00 P-4 2.200 0.865 11.570 83.570 0 00:10:00 P-5 2.200 1.972 0.730 98.000 0 00:10:00 System 2.200 0.665 45.61 Node Depth Summary Node Average Maximum Maximum Time of Max Total Total Retention ID Depth Depth HGL Occurrence Flooded Time Time Attained Attained Attained volume Flooded ft ft ft days hh:mm acre -in minutes hh:mm:ss Page 6 11016-post-25.txt Jun -4 0.55 2.59 6182.09 0 12:35 0 0 0:00:00 Out -1 0.00 0.00 6200.00 0 00:00 0 0 0:00:00 Out -3 0.47 1.50 6180.50 0 12:07 0 0 0:00:00 Jun -1 0.61 3.69 6183.69 0 12:35 0 0 0:00:00 Node Flow Summary Node Element Maximum Peak Time of Maximum Time of Peak ID Type Lateral Inflow Peak Inflow Flooding Flooding Inflow Occurrence Overflow Occurrence cfs cfs days hh:mm cfs days hh:mm Jun -4 JUNCTION 0.00 11.05 0 12:34 0.00 Out -1 OUTFALL 0.56 0.56 0 12:09 0.00 Out -3 OUTFALL 0.00 11.04 0 12:36 0.00 Jun -1 STORAGE 39.71 39.71 0 12:10 0.00 Detention Pond Summary Detention Pond ID Maximum Maximum Time of Max Average Average Maximum Maximum Time of Max. Total Ponded Ponded Ponded Ponded Ponded Pond Exfiltration Exfiltration Exfiltrated Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Outflow Rate Rate volume 1000 ft3 (%) days hh:mm 1000 ft3 (%) cfs cfm hh:mm:ss 1000 ft3 Jun -1 11.05 45.000 54 0 12:35 6.405 8 0.00 0:00:00 0.000 Outfall Loading Summary Outfall Node ID Flow Average Peak Frequency Flow Inflow (%) cfs cfs Page 7 Out -1 78.83 Out -3 90.13 11016-post-25.txt 0.04 0.56 2.35 11.04 System 84.48 Link Flow Summary 2.40 11.17 Link ID Element Design Ratio of Ratio of Type Flow Maximum Maximum Capacity /Design cfs Flow Depth Time of Maximum Total Peak Flow Velocity Time Occurrence Attained Flow Surcharged days hh:mm ft/sec Minutes Length Peak Flow Factor during Analysis cfs Con -1 19.98 Con -4 7.89 Reg -1 0.00 1.40 CONDUIT 0.50 CONDUIT 1.00 ORIFICE 1.00 0 00:00 0.00 1.00 0 0 12:36 6.25 1.00 115 0 12:34 Analysis begun on: Tue Jun 28 10:18:50 2011 Analysis ended on: Tue Jun 28 10:18:53 2011 Total elapsed time: 00:00:03 Page 8 0.00 11.04 11.05 I1016-post-I00.txt BOSS International StormNET6 - Version 4.19.3 (Build 221) �****.*********** Analysis Options **************** Flow Units Subbasin Hydrograph Method Time of Concentration Link Routing Method Pond Exfiltration Starting Date Ending Date Report Time Step ************* Element Count AAAAAAAAA1��� Number of rain gages Number of subbasins Number of nodes Number of links cfs SCS TR -55 SCS TR -55 Hydrodynamic None MAY -II -201I 00:00:00 MAY -I2 -201I 00:06:00 00:05:00 2 5 4 3 **************** Raingage Summary **************** Gage ID Data Source Data Type Interval hours 100 -YEAR 25 -year **************** Subbasin Summary **************** Subbasin ID 100 -YEAR 25 -year Total Area acres P-1 P-2 P-3 P-4 P-5 ************ Node Summary ************ Node ID 2.00 43.62 6.90 9.73 0.30 Element Type CUMULATIVE CUMULATIVE Invert Elevation ft Maximum Elev' ft 0.10 0.10 Ponded External Area Inflow ft2 Jun -4 Out -1 Out -3 Jun -1 JUNCTION OUTFALL OUTFALL STORAGE 6179.50 6200.00 6179.00 6180.00 Page 1 6183.00 6200.00 6180.50 6186.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Link Summary Link Manning's ID Roughness From Node 11016-post-100.txt To Node Element Length Slope Type ft Con -1 Jun -1 Jun -4 CONDUIT 0.0150 Con -4 Jun -4 Out -3 CONDUIT 0.0150 Reg -1 Jun -1 Jun -4 ORIFICE Cross Section Summary 135.1 4.8175 66.6 0.7512 Link Shape Depth/ width No. of Cross Full Flow Design ID Diameter Barrels Sectional Hydraulic Flow Radius ft Capacity cfs Area ft ft ft2 Con -1 0.38 Con -4 0.38 CIRCULAR 19.98 CIRCULAR 7.89 Runoff Quantity Continuity 1.50 1.50 1 1.77 1.50 1.50 1 1.77 volume Depth acre -ft inches Total Precipitation 13.732 Surface Runoff 0.482 Continuity Error (%) -0.000 Flow Routing Continuity Volume acre -ft 2.634 0.092 volume Mgallons External Inflow 0.000 0.000 External Outflow 4.706 1.533 Initial Stored volume 0.000 0.000 Final Stored Volume 0.104 0.034 Continuity Error (%) 0.001 Composite Curve Number Computations Report Subbasin P-1 Page 2 11016-post-100.txt Soil/Surface Description CN Area (acres) Soil Group Pasture, grassland, or range, Fair 69.00 Composite Area & weighted CN 69.00 Subbasin P-2 Soil/Surface Description CN 2.00 B 2.00 Area Soil (acres) Group 98.00 69.00 Composite Area & weighted CN 77.36 Subbasin P-3 Soil/Surface Description CN 12.57 31.05 43.62 Area Soil (acres) Group 98.00 69.00 Composite Area & weighted CN 86.15 Subbasin P-4 Soil/Surface Description CN 4.08 2.82 6.90 Area Soil (acres) Group 98.00 69.00 Composite Area & weighted CN 83.57 Subbasin P-5 Page 3 4.89 4.84 9.73 Area Soil 11016-post-100.txt Soil/Surface Description (acres) Group CN - 0.30 98.00 Composite Area & weighted CN 0.30 98.00 SCS TR -55 Time of Concentration Computations Report Sheet Flow Equation Tc = (0.007 ., ((n ., Lf)A0.8)) / ((PA0.5) (SfA0.4)) where: Tc = Time of Concentration (hrs) n = Manning's Roughness Lf = Flow Length (ft) P = 2 yr, 24 hr Rainfall (inches) Sf = Slope (ft/ft) Shallow Concentrated Flow Equation v = 16.1345 (SfA0.5) (unpaved surface) v = 20.3282 :; (SfA0.5) (paved surface) v = 15.0 (SfA0.5) (grassed waterway surface) v = 10.0 :; (SfA0.5) (nearly bare & untilled surface) v = 9.0 (SfA0.5) (cultivated straight rows surface) v = 7.0 :; (SfA0.5) (short grass pasture surface) v = 5.0 (SfA0.5) (woodland surface) V = 2.5 :; (SfA0.5) (forest w/heavy litter surface) Tc = (Lf / v) / (3600 sec/hr) where: Tc = Time of Concentration (hrs) Lf = Flow Length (ft) v = velocity (ft/sec) Sf = Slope (ft/ft) Channel Flow Equation v = (1.49 (RA(2/3)) (SfA0.5)) / n R = Aq / wp Tc = (Lf / v) / (3600 sec/hr) where: Tc = Time of Concentration (hrs) Lf = Flow Length (ft) R = Hydraulic Radius (ft) Aq = Flow Area (ft2) wp = wetted Perimeter (ft) v = velocity (ft/sec) Page 4 11016-post-100.txt sf = Slope (ft/ft) n = Manning's Roughness Subbasin P-1 User -Defined TOC override (minutes): 10.00 Subbasin P-2 Sheet Flow Computations Subarea C Manning's Roughness: 0.00 Flow Length (ft): 0.00 Slope (%): 0.00 2 yr, 24 hr Rainfall (in): 1.20 velocity (ft/sec): 0.00 Computed Flow Time (minutes): 0.00 Shallow Concentrated Flow Computations Subarea C Flow Length (ft): 0.00 Slope (%): 0.00 Surface Type: Unpaved velocity (ft/sec): 0.00 Computed Flow Time (minutes): 0.00 Channel Flow Computations Subarea C Manning's Roughness: 0.00 Flow Length (ft): 0.00 Channel Slope (%): 0.00 Cross Section Area (ft2): 0.00 wetted Perimeter (ft): 0.00 velocity (ft/sec): 0.00 Computed Flow Time (minutes): 0.00 Page 5 Subarea A 0.15 211.00 9.00 1.20 0.22 15.93 Subarea B 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.20 0.00 0.00 Subarea A Subarea B 504.00 0.00 25.00 0.00 Grass pasture Unpaved 3.50 0.00 2.40 0.00 Subarea A 0.03 1686.00 3.00 5.00 6.00 7.62 3.69 Subarea B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11016-post-100.txt Total TOC (minutes): 22.02 Subbasin P-3 User -Defined TOC override (minutes): 10.00 Subbasin P-4 User -Defined TOC override (minutes): 10.00 Subbasin P-5 User -Defined TOC override (minutes): 10.00 Subbasin Runoff Summary Subbasin Total Total Peak weighted Time of ID Precip Runoff Runoff Curve Concentration in in cfs Number days hh:mm:ss P-1 2.600 0.467 1.120 69.000 0 00:10:00 P-2 2.600 0.821 34.210 77.360 0 00:22:01 P-3 2.600 1.336 12.750 86.150 0 00:10:00 P-4 2.600 1.167 15.710 83.570 0 00:10:00 P-5 2.600 2.369 0.870 98.000 0 00:10:00 System 2.600 0.928 58.10 Node Depth Summary Node Average Maximum Maximum Time of Max Total Total Retention ID Depth Depth HGL Occurrence Flooded Time Time Attained Attained Attained volume Flooded ft ft ft days hh:mm acre -in minutes hh:mm:ss Page 6 11016-post-100.txt Jun -4 0.64 3.36 6182.86 0 12:38 0 0 0:00:00 Out -1 0.00 0.00 6200.00 0 00:00 0 0 0:00:00 Out -3 0.52 1.50 6180.50 0 12:02 0 0 0:00:00 Jun -1 0.75 5.26 6185.26 0 12:38 0 0 0:00:00 Node Flow Summary Node Element Maximum Peak Time of Maximum Time of Peak ID Type Lateral Inflow Peak inflow Flooding Flooding Inflow Occurrence Overflow Occurrence cfs cfs days hh:mm cfs days hh:mm Jun -4 JUNCTION 0.00 13.48 0 12:37 0.00 Out -1 OUTFALL 1.05 1.05 0 12:05 0.00 Out -3 OUTFALL 0.00 13.48 0 12:39 0.00 Jun -1 STORAGE 56.96 56.96 0 12:10 0.00 Detention Pond Summary Detention Pond ID Maximum Maximum Time of Max Average Average Maximum Maximum Time of Max. Total Ponded Ponded Ponded Ponded Ponded Pond Exfiltration Exfiltration Exfiltrated Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Outflow Rate Rate volume 1000 ft3 (%) days hh:mm 1000 ft3 (%) cfs cfm hh:mm:ss 1000 ft3 Jun -1 13.48 70.192 84 0 12:38 8.089 10 0.00 0:00:00 0.000 Outfall Loading Summary Outfall Node ID Flow Average Peak Frequency Flow Inflow (%) cfs cfs Page 7 Out -1 77.77 Out -3 91.26 11016-post-100.txt 0.06 1.05 2.78 13.48 System 84.51 Link Flow Summary 2.83 13.66 Link ID Element Design Ratio of Ratio of Type Flow Maximum Maximum Capacity /Design cfs Flow Depth Time of Maximum Total Peak Flow Velocity Time Occurrence Attained Flow Surcharged days hh:mm ft/sec Minutes Length Peak Flow Factor during Analysis cfs Con -1 19.98 Con -4 7.89 Reg -1 0.00 1.71 CONDUIT 0.50 CONDUIT 1.00 ORIFICE 1.00 0 00:00 0.00 1.00 0 0 12:39 7.63 1.00 180 0 12:37 Analysis begun on: Tue Jun 28 10:20:45 2011 Analysis ended on: Tue Jun 28 10:20:47 2011 Total elapsed time: 00:00:02 Page 8 0.00 13.48 13.48 N. N. \ \ N. - ` \ i .moi / i \ r \ \ \ \ \ \ N N \ / / / , 1 f / /% / / \ \\ \� L \ ��-\\ \\ \ / /� -- -• - -- r -- - \ \ i \ /~ �\ 1111\ \ �/ //' ---- _ ~ti \ \ \ \\ \ Nt \ \ N. - - �- - // / //' / // --- �/ ' ---�-- - N. 4 • \\\ \\\ \\`_ \\ \\\ \\ --- /' / �' ----BASIN- SO RY 1 1\ \ 1i ----. 9�`--__ /_'_ ` `\ `O�F9� f r __- _'/ /' / '' - r _r \N. \ —__ // `- r_ %111— \ ` \ \ ` '-- \ \N. --- \ \ \/ _ _—_—_—_—_—_—_— _� / \ -----// '_ / `\ N. \ \\ / �� _ \ _ —1 \ N. N. / / /� N. / f 2: ///----.--_ i —7 7--- — _ter -- N. �/ N Y-- ` N. \ \ \ \ / /, -rte= �/+ ! / / ---\ , -- -_ �� - _ _ ��� J /' / \ �� - \ \ \ \ �_ �' tet} /r / / 1\ INITIALS DATE DESIGNED BY SOH 06-24-11 DRAWN BY TAW 06-24-11 CHECKED BY '- - `. iR t c % '%i -i ��~ ~A%`. 1 ��\ ` - 1 ��� N. \-` / i _ - I l \� - - _�- \ 1111 - - =0b�9— . N. - - - _ l r , 7777 -_-/ -' _ ---- - - % - - `�__�:It _ - - _-- a\_; \ _- =-=` -- __--- -- -_--_-_--_ _7:--- __ - -/ = - _ r _/ \\ \ \-\ \ \ I li`= i'ii//� ' 7-7-.__ _ / % ( 1 �_ -_��� ~ 1-��F�9�\\ --- �•-� \------ ----- -------- __---- ter'//__-__-_-_T____ ---- — ���\\\\\\\ - ��/' ///o.ss— 1111 Ir—— \ 7777 — --- ___ —_='~` —_ ~= \� �� —• —� \— __=EL_ � —------- r —�— — — ;—\\ \\ — — — — — -- \- \ \ ` i /�%/i' i i''=�/ rj / I Jl f\ l`_\ -_-_-_—_-_-_-L-____- =-1 ^� -= --- - = zz� -?„ �� �_ -_�-_� -_ __ I I- ------_ ��N\� �;\� \ rl '-- -- -OZ£'9- _--- _- _------_ ��'j�r=== - \\--� _ �-- -_ J / \ `\ __- -- �/ //• _-=630 - __ �� - - - -'- \ f --- 1f 1 •\ '— I 1 J —09£9— \ ^\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ I 1 //i/�///'!'//�-��/ I __—____- ____= -___- _-=� _�_= _-= �_ �`__________=__--1-c--------_-----_--1--_-—_ __—_ ——__—__—______ =__�_\ (//%% \�\ \����c > �` -' o I ////"`J1j 7777/ i//2 / `_-----_ - --- � i - __1 - - � -_---_--7,---__--_--- -_ --- -� -~ \\-1-1--__=-_r._ -____ -_----- ~ �� \ l \ \ \�\\\�7 \/-\ I I 6// / i/ / =6290— — i \ _\�_ — -_y__ \\ \ ` lit \ \ _ - II/,� /i°///// /// { -------------- - — - -_ _ -� \\� --� _ =� ---- — \\ \ \ -\ `- — — = -- -- _\ 11JI1,�f/ ,'>»//,/ /�!- _\ // /7i/ =� - _- =_=_`\� 1/ `\ V' //�°,,,�j�-1 \__ ____ —=6zao—====-__== =_ = �„°��s`; ==_= ==____=____— _—~ `-N� \�\\�\ \\\ \\\ \�� =-_ \`:Al: \\ \ \ \ \ \\ I v / r \/:-_______________—__ _-�--,_ _, \\_--_� —_ ;_— --_— _ _—_�� --\ \ \ \ „. , \/ /// - x \ 77/77 /// 9°/,,,, \ / -= --=----_6061----__= ---�� `-=--=0--\ —� --�-----___--- ___ _ = \\ �\\\\�\\\\\\\ r_��\I1 / /, /I, /, , /, _ �\ ti _ ____-_------_--_-�- 6z\`\ _--_- _ -__-__-_ \\ \ \ \ \ \\ /// / /// / / /� - /�- \ Y//ii /iii/,///�✓//'�--`~ _`-�� L=\\\\\\\ \ \\ _ \ 1 // / // / y- /,,, ---- - -- ---- -\\\ \� �\ l ( / ,� ,,\ - — �_ --_ - — \ \\ ;-\� __ _- __ _—=_ \-1111\\\\;�\\� \\ \\\ \\ ���—_1,l,7,1 ;,N1,;(171771:71:/2/7//111:11 //////''��0�%%� \%%iii='�==_�_— — _626 ___====_ —=_`_=_— --__ __ — =��_— = v:///: \\\\\),\�1 1// /, �,///' -- \1:::: \ _--=_°8��`—_ ___-___ ` \\�\ \ \\\ l // /,/– \ /// ////� 1`��\\`� \ \ \ \_ — 1111\\ j�//J///,//ii i%— __—_ �6250= -- �_��� —\`— —\`�� � �� -- -- _ ----- \\��\\\\\\ 6�60�j/ /JII j�/1l/Il//J/ // ////7777//'/ --� ------------------- –1 -- –` _`\ –__ --_--\\–_--__-------- –\\\ \\ \ \ \\\ \� \\ \ \ \ – /i/// //// J) / //• \ -~ \ /j///�//1 /// ~� \ 1111 '/ /// \ \ \ , ///� 6300 //'moi=-===_-- _ _ _ —= �_>~_-' -- `= \� __ _� �_— �_` — — _ _ — _\ \ \\ \ \\ \ \ \ --__----_- 1111\ \ 7777 / / // / 1\ / /// / / / // / -- - -- \ 1111\\ \ \ / -- �� _ \\�Z9 _ -_ — �� \\�\\\\ \\ \ \ \\ \ - \ \\\� �^ \—//////// 7777,// / / / 7777 l 7777/ // / /i_� �_ ` _--- -\ \ - - \\\ / p/ ////'/� /� — -- \ �� ---6240= _-- x - ---- -- /, / ///7 _// // ///i �_ ____------- =---- — —��_ �—~ice \—\\\� '—---_--_—\\�� ---_--_---=_` — \ \ 1111 \\ \\\\�\\ \ 1111\\ / 635i//// / /// / /\ Y\ 17777777// -- ~� -_-\-`— 0929=_- �\ \\ 1111\\ \\\ \\\ \\\��—�\—�i//// ////�/jj////////�// \ ////////�///��_-__- —_— _�' _i- _` — __— 1111\\ \ J- - / / //L _—--------- ---- — _ \� \\�_� _ -- �\ _ ---- — ----- --= \\ \ \ 1111 \ \ \ \�\ \\\ \\ \ —40 7777// /'///'>,/ // // / / / / = 6230— — ~ \\\ — --i-_ \_ — — —_ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\\ — / / / /1-4l , l /// / // / i i =—_------------- — — _ — —� —� —\ ------ \ \\\\ .- \ \\ \\ �\ \ 3 -- j //' - —6 — — ---- _-- ----- \\ 1111 \ \ \ \ \ \\ \�\ _— // / / // /• // l ,l// I // / /,/ /,/j///i �i\ �~_ --\ \ `=0S -=----_ '/ —� \ \\\\ \ \ -------- - — _ = -- . _- 1111\\ \ _� //�' —// / // \_\ , 111 \� / / �/ / // / �_-- — =-- __--- =ti �_�����\ ,�— --- —`--_ -- —= —_—__----\\ \\ ,\ \ \ \\\ \\\ ��=—� —\\_-- Z9_ \\\ \\\ \ \ \\ \\N \\ \\\ \ — /ll/ll///n / // /' ~_= -- �— —�� i/i / i/ i / \\� \ \_ / ' N1/ _ ___— —_= _6220— ____— —_— \\\\ \ ir /� 7777 / \ -- \\ 1111 — \ / /�/ /\ i / /7 l/, 7/// N ////--�—_— ;>»�--t\\� \---_—=—��\ ---- _--- \ \ \ �\ �\\\ \� 'l� 6 330 // 'INEERING, CIVIL CONSULTANT,S1 502 MAIN STREET CARBONDALE, CO 81623 (970) 704-0311 FAX; (970)-7040313 \ \ // ___-- _ i— _ ___—_ —\\\ \\ _ -//////\ / // / /// // � / �\ 1 i 1 i — — — \\ y \ \\ I! l �,,/ / / // \ // �%/j/\ \ \ __ - \� \\�— --_ \\ \\\ �� -`- --; \_-_-- __�_~_�;_,-_--_ _ _ - / / / /_ _ _ _ 1111 Vr1111 = ---- - ` 11 111111 _ l l// /7777 ///////'� =` \\\- -- — __ � _ -_---_=_=;,\ -N."- 1111\ \\ 1111 \\ N. N., \\o ___ / //\ 111 1\ l l / // / _ _ \\ \ - _ \ \\\\\ \ 1\\ \\\\�\\\\ \� \\ , / ,/zz/z// /moi\ / /\– \ \ I llllllljl //7//*/7.77 ���-\\`��`o£z9--__�= __-- — — — __ -�\\ 1111\ \\ \/\ / \ \\�\\\\ �O �9 %/ j //�/\ \ \\ \ \ _ _ -� - —_ `_—\ 111111111111111!\ // / – – -_ – \ L – -- — – – —_– – \\ \\\ 1111 \\\\ \`9 \ - - -r / 111( fl Ill /!/111 ///7777 / - \\\\_- --____ -�-�---=________-___ \ \1111 1111 \ \\ \ \\\ \\ i / / / //////�\\\` — ����--_--_-—�� ��\\� 1111\\�\o\\\�sz� \��\ 1111\\ \\ \\ _--��Oii'/'/i// /i,.��\ JII 1 1l I I Iln- I! 11x111 /1//l'i/ ////� \\ _=20=_ — — _ - -__- \ \ e / /// / /\ _ -�� �_-- _ -_-- -- –��\\\ \ \ \\ 1111 1111\ \9\\\\9\ \\ / // / / /\ , fill III! I Iff l //l/ / //- ---_ -- - --- -- \\ III(illi 111 !1111-1111J11flIJf11 /1////////--i /-� `�i21o�='�--_________-�`=\��\���p\\\�s2\\��Z9\\\\\\\\\\�\\\\\\\1111\\\ � �0/�/// jj/ ///^\ III 11 II III\ J 111 11 //llI - -- — — — '_-_ \ \ x1111 \ \\ -- / /// ///\ 1111( fill I I - 111 I 1 1111 /I/ --_ / `_1777--_-�__� �__ -____—� \�\ �\of\\\\zs\\� \ \ \ \\ \ \\ \ - 6 /, /i\ I1 1 11 / 111 /1 /-�-_-- / /r - \ \ ____---- _\ o\ \z\\� �\ 1111 \\\�\ \\ \\P \ \�--'ii�'/i�i'i_� i�\ - %C \\ 2 \ 9 \ \\ 1111 \\ \ / // Oi/ —= --\\ z\ \\ \ \\ \\\\ \\\\� I Il"1 1111 1 1 11 - Il 111 If 1 i1n11 /--1„--:--;---n----_-_-_-_-_- --=-------------- // / �_= -� _ \ /,/// /'i✓// il IfI1 1f I Ifl 1 Ill 11 Irl1 , // -=-= _ --- -- __ // \ \ \` \\\ \\ \ \ \ \ \ �\ \1` \ \ \ \ // / / / \\ \ /777/ %//% / % 1 I 111 1I 111\__•11I III 71111111111 ///��__-=w_= _ — — — — — _------------//' - 1 \ <� 1111\ �\ \ \\\\�\ \ \\\ \ 11 1 1 \ \ ,j,-7,</;,, i / /-- \ \ \ \\\C\\ 11 \ 1//ii/ I fill l \ \ 1 / -~/- \,;11111111110/1111011\L 1I r — IIIfI 1 111/1111111/11/7/1/1 /////i------------� ---- -- — — — — _ \� / /i /i /9// - — / II \ ,111 `---- — — \�\�\ � 11111 I ` / 111I1II / 1 I l !// \ \-- BASIN #1 \ 1111 \1 1 I �/!//IJ1 I \ / 1 \ s 1 1 III ! I II 1 1 1 11 I I I I I I III I 111!IIIlIIllll \ \-\ JI11111111,1111/i; x 1111 1111(11 111111 -� 111111111,1 IIII f1 11111\ \ \ / 4 ! \ N \\ V //�/// �/ 111!// l/l ll III IIII \I-NON/1101'1 f 1 \ 1 11 !1 I 1111111 1 1I1 1 1 ////ii/ /// \ i ii,/i ii/' ��/ ' 11I I I 1 1 \ // // // / / 11 I II 11 \ // 1 I \\\I /ii/ / / / A 2.09 ACRS /I11f1 /// / 1 11 / /i / �i/ / / ,!/ 111! 1J b I I11f1 111 II 111111 1 A \ l 1 z 7 / l Iln N 0 !I 1\ I 1 1 I II I I \ 1 ' 9 \ 7777///7777/ /// / / / / /! 1 f / / 1 7777,//, Al IV \\ vv� 1V\ O v1 -VII JIo111111r11 11 iii ----II 1 f 1111111 111� \ V 1 v�/j////7j///�/�//// 7777 1111!111 �i/ji�%''' /� ! I� 1 11 1 11 1 I II , I I \ \ 1 BA IN 2 0 l l I1 l// 1/o 11 1 ///�7//¼//' / // / ///////// DATE \ 111 /,,/, l I / / / \N l' Ill 11 1 I 1 IV //1CD / ///I/ 7111111111///1/ 1 N \ // 7777/// / 7777 77/ �� �' /% // /%/ // // 7777 ' '/ //'/ / / ` �i' , 1 `N 1 \ / / // // /, \ \ 1 --------- \ \ / I l l l lI 1 ///0/7 11 l l l l l I ///// // / / //�/// , / / / / /// / / / / / / / /, //COO l/ l /, _ J OI I l 11 1 IOW 1/ / \ 1 17.41 t'/0'4'¼ l�/lll1,11 I _—�\�l`0's/ m \, \\ _ /ii/ // ////*'////////\ _/,/,/tip/%/11111/ III 1 I //i//i,//�/,/,�1///� /i/%///o//�l///l, /I \ l l \I \ , / /,/ //,,/�/ // / /,�,/ / / // , //�/ / // / 7777 / // / / / / \ // / / / /7 777// /////� 0 1 \ \ 7��//7//i///// / //7/ 7/7/ /// 7777/ �0/�///'///'/,// , LEGEND 1 \ // /,,/7 "// /, // 7777 / /� %''// \\w/////7/7/i////7i \ ,' — v l/l 1 / /// ( l I l \ / /k /// ljlll I/ / , �1�///// li l l !Oil lI l 11 °� / l l i 1 , a \ //i///7� /7 /7/ // //i /� �� 7777//////jury/x///11--,--0/71 llllll�l/llllll l A--1 1 f \ N 11 //////o//'�/// 77'7 7 /7/'///////// ////2 7777 EXISTING CONTOUR / /o // // // // /////// l ////// l / \ J,l //Ill Ol l t 1 rn m \ \ \\ O`L// ,/'/� / ' 7777// 7 /, / / / 77,/ //' ,777EXISTING CONTOUR INTERVAL / /// // / 1 Op///G3/ /j / /� �\ 1 1 \ //ti// / ///// 7777// / // / / lllllllllll�In�-llllll/1/l�ilill//%\1\I rn \ 1 \ 1 \ ///i/////m��"//a°/// �i //'%/ ��' //' Y/// � /� / /�/ Tc FL W PATH /o, 1117 l OR/ \ // / /// ti// /� / \ / /' /J \ \ - / 7 N. ' / / I ,/ l,l l/ / l / 1 ! 1 �// / /p /h//// / // / / O — 1 TIME OF CONCENTRATION FLOW PATH \ O 1 \ O/ // ,/ / ///////////4/4/////V/;//j// 7777 // 7777// // �--/ 7777//' / 7777`°/ /// 11\I / \ 1 1 7777// // ///7 / /4///� / V//�///� //V///V/ // /, //// / / / // 1 / / \ \ // / / / / / //1/� / // / / / / PRE-DEVELOPED BASIN BOUNDARY \ — — / 1111 \ , ,, 7777/, , O 1, !ill 1/4/ 11 -J 11 // 1/ l / lig lnl // If I \ // 0R7 I 1 1 1 \ \ \ \ \ ' 7i' i/'/i/ 7777' ////� / ti g �o /� �// / //�/ // I // 7/i 7777 ////////i/i/io// tiA /17///i/21///// \ \ / � � / \ / ^ / ,7/� \ -- 1/ice/i� 1 /i // \\�_'/�'%% / /////iiq // /'� �/ /��,�/� /// l//2 /'�r /1* / / -----„=-:,-i-,_J//%/pill/ 7 /////1 111 l// ��ll/1111/ l� II 1 1 1 / /// //� ,' ,l//�//// 1 \ 1 y/ // 7777 /�/ // //////�//// ///�/ / /, // \ - J 1/ 1// 1 �i/�/1;///// /1/1111 /l////////l/ I I /l l \ ` ,'/�/// ,r/ l 11 lC�l 7777 / II \ 1 \ 7777 / / 7777/ // / /, //'i/i /// / /� /i'/ ////// 1/ 11111/1111 11 lJ1/11 II rl/, 1/11 / 1 \ \ 1/ / // /// /// // // / / / Jr_ I 1 1 _ J/ / I / 1 1 I 1/ ) 1 \ 11 / / // / // �/ / / /� // / /i / //// /�/, ' _Il 1 /Il / , 1 /11/ 1 1 1, , 1 v 11 /1 /l 1, //////7// ,/// 777,7//, // / .7/7/7/7/, 1 /i / 11 1 /l/ /� / ? ///// //,/7/ , I 1 /// l 1 / I 1 \ 1 11 11/ l/�lrr if l///7 �� / / // ' 1 1 ( �, / /// // r, ll� 11 l \ 1 (1 I Il 11 l I 1 1 / S 1 II 1 BASIN # AREA o > w ce ll,l��//�/I .:-------'--------------z-------- /// /I111111111\NI //�i�jfJr11�« I l 'l�lllli111 -.-----z.----------z-_-__=-= �i�,fll�\� li//94,/,#/h6llirl\1 1f vl ----------s-------z------------------'x;.'7''4\\\-1-s=% I \ I `-1/111/1/I(1111// � 1 l 111 1 \ -II 1111 �� 111 yi l v.,\,,,, _____„,r, //0 1 1 1 1�_-/' ' 1 \ ! 1 -- l//\ 111111 ` i �' \ 1 - l / 1 /11 \ t - - 1 \ \ I1 1 .///;7/,/ 1111 I�1! !/1 HU 111111 ( i/ II f I /,/ / i I I III 1111 111 I ( 1 \ 1 , //i/,/, �/; I I II II I II III (c,, ,,11�� _ �./,,/,, //ii 1111111 1 1 1 1 1111 1 1 1 1 1111\ \\ //�// // fII1 // // / 111 1111J111' 1111 111II I) 1 1 \\\\\ � �� ��i �/1 < 025 0100 07 / \`\\ \�= o //lI �� =-___\ � =�/ /1J \ \ \ r/ ! 1 / II�J /i/ 111,E I 1 / / I DESIGN POINT 2 1 \ I 11 11 111111) ? t \ = �/' / ---i // \ _� __ , ��w����\��-- �� /_v / \ / //////////7/7/////07///71/ 1If///�/1 /llll�v 1 1 1l ) 1 -/i� / \ \ 1 / /III/ ll l 1 11 l l / , �-� it % ; \\ v — —"vv`v _=cc=_ - 11 Ji//„ 11 I*�// -a7/'%I ) I -- 1k1/4///// - - - 7 �/� 1 vv v ////////,////'lilt// l I v / / -- /,\-;moi.';. ' I 1 1 -��\��/,� \\ 11111 \t1 _ -/ /7/////////l/l,, 1 \ \_ ` t � / r/ \\\ _ 1 / / 7777 / / // // / / // / `o 1 %�Y.//�iA \ z __�_���_ \ / _ _ ���\\\ _/ 1 /;r1o� �//�//i�/7J/ Sl ///ii /lei` � �\ � 1 l 1 �✓ / i /yam/ ��1 ° / /, / 1 � � // % // . OWERS PIT CONCRETE BATCH LANT COMP PLAN AMENDMENT ;ARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO PRE -DEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE BASINS -� � /lI 11 1 \`\` `- \` \\\� �/' // 4///� ////j�/'///1. / ! ��\-/ i,ii' 1p�;r/ ` - ��\\� 1111\,\c /' /////i/i�/// 1 I \ '- i/i� // 7777/ ,C / / / -\ l –;\--\ -\ 1111 \ \\ \ \ �- \ — — \— \ /� `� L �\\ \ \\�\\\ \\� `'so 77 ,77 Ire \ \\ \— \ \ 1111 4- � / /�- �_� ' \ \ \\ \\ o \ . / 4 ad ...<__-_----.,-.....---------, `• - �1 - �`\�\\�- - `___------Z„--- ://� -------- �/ -� Z9� I i\�\\\\\\\\\\ \ f/// 'ft \ F Tc ROW PATH / / /�// — i _ _ \ \ \ \ /i '\ dt � _ - --_____:_c____:-'^+ \ -__-__-- „ c..--_-__.:-..--z____-:____- _- -sr_ ----_- _-_-_---;<„,<---,--;----,-- -5- ---_-_-_-_ -----S----;--ji-,-----0-7----- Cr- ---: I '‘\\\,\\\ /// ----_-_-< ` ��.� \_ //, .1 // / /—_ o£Zs� ,-1111\\ ( \\\\ --- *+• // �� �/� - / / / f / ^ `— ��\\\ 1\\\ \\\ DESIGN POINT 1 _ ` \ v \ �`` `` `� - - ` ' 11-- - �� \ — `, ` — = oo -\✓ GRAPHIC 0 50 100 SCALE 200 aoo __ -----\-:____i______ `` `— — - \ ` ( IN FEET ) — _ ` - 1 inch = 100 ft. ` ` ` \ I_ E V EXHIBIT 1: DATE: June 24, 2011 JOB NO. 11016 M:\3100DWGS\11016\comp plan\11016-DRAINAGE.DWG SHEET 1 OF 1 \ \ \ 1 \ \ \ / / / / - N. - - / \ N. N - - \ ` \ N. \ - � � - / / �OZf 9- \ I - \ L • �-£ - \ \ \ \ r / / /� --- • ~Of'f s_ --- N. \\\ \\\\\\`_ \\ \'\\ \\ ~— — _ /� / J �- BDA BO�WDAf�Y 1 ` ��9�='---_ '/ ` \` °� J _ -'/ _-' /'- /'/ — — - / / // / / > \ \7.--/ - mac= = _-- -- -- -- 1— i \ _ -- - �/ �! — - _. DESIGNED BY S:\\SSO`Y\1` DRAWN BY TAW \\ `I I A` CHECKED BY :,,— \ \ r \ ` \ �_ J / //�� / / J �- / I y f I: � 1 _� t ~ C_ ~ \ \ /// ~ 1_ \ \ -...,NN,\ ` \ / ' - / 'ice \ -IT J J/r —09f9—\\\\\\ \ _may' �\ / `�\-`-� ���\ \ \\ \\ / 0 / /i i �- e ----- _--- --- - —_ ----- _ \\ I -- - ( \\\ // \\ �\ _�=1 Il fjj//6%%/ ji�i �_-_6290 — _--__- _� =� `_ --- -� -�_ __-_--_____-__ (/�los \\�\\\\\` \> // �� i �i//�i �\ < --____ _ _ </ / \��---C9:----__-----�� __-- _-� `� \\\\ \\\ ll?� \� \ ./ ata // i ////„ -1/ ii \N 1 /// � � N. \ \ _ -1 -- - - -�\ r -\yam°, \ 1// // i/i// -- ----- � �-_=___----___-__--_- -- --_-----":-----S-: ---_---- \/r211/// 1 III/ \\ \\ 7,___---------0 I /��i/ii goii%,v'`' '�- __IC_ ___ / // /, / _/ ==-sz�o= � _ _-i-,_�;�` moo= �_'�`,\� -_ — � =— _ _ `- `� \\\ \ \\\,� �\\\ \ \ x \ =-=N \\\\�\ / /�, _�/ N. \\\ \ -- 11111111y/c/// \ N. \ \ �\ // // o =-==__ —_ -= __ _ `_ ~ _ _� — i� -_ — — = __- _ \ \ /' —6260— - �_\_� \ — \ \ \ \ \ \ < / t V/////// -�\ \\\ \ \ \ \ �\ \ MIN' \\•>) / "= ii' / �_� __ =� -_ _�� \� //,/' _ _�\- /% //// ��` \ \ \ \ N. \ 1 \ \\ 1/1111 1 / /7 / — N.N. `\ u1/4/7,1/4/7/1/4/7//,777\ N.N. \ \ 77 ��� �_ `\\�—_ __~ — ��— --__-- _� 6 0i% /) J %//// ' //' �/ �_--n-=--.=-7---- --------- - N.//// .y / / —6240— i--�� --�\\� \-- \� — \ \ \ \ \ \ /7„:', // / _ N. N N / 111 /l /,„ //: Y //// //// "„)- /��/ ---=----------- -- — �� \\` �~ __ _—\_—_ ----- _—__--__\\\ \ \ \ \\\ \ \\\\\\ \ \\ \ \\\ \\� �/ l —�_/� / /, / /// \ / / //////// /"y =// / �// //////// __----�� — �� \� \� — � \�__—___-- — _—`\\ \\\�\ \\� ''`. \� N. \\� �\\ \ �� Jt' -- ///�/, /�//i/� /�%'— / 64 'a \ \ ___------2-- ------- _— _16340 J 11 / / / // 7//'"'.:-.,..C..1.--5------------ - ----- - ` \ _oS — --_-_ \ \\ \\ \ N. __ /..-"' /// /„2.2, \ ��--� _--_-`�- — — _= \\\\\ \\\ \\\\ \\ \ __ 6220— —_ _ - �_ c-_---- \\\\ \ \\NNN \..\ \ — �- — �////�/// A' /////////7/ '///////�� �`—� ��\— — \ \ N. IlJl1//J1/ll J�IJI ------ _ _--- — —�~ _—_—_—_— \\�_ _____ ____ \ \\\\\\\ \�\\\\ -a- ------C-- — _--_ ' v — \ = /// \ `l' 633 / OPRIS ENGINEERING, CIVIL CONSULTANTS) 502 MAIN STREET CARBONDALE, CO 81623 (970) 704-0311 FAX: (970)-704-0313 \ \ 111 l / //// -- __- — — — — =-,------.\\\\\_,--.\- \o \\\\ � \ _ — — / // //// / — - y--_ - \ \\\ \ \\ \ \\ \ / / / / � — � � � � = �Z9— � � �` \�\�\\\\\\\ \\ ///// i N. \ \ N. -� \\ V1!!1 11' l � !!! 11 1!111 11 fli111 11 1 \JIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII __<1 >_ _ _------s_-__ I/� _ _\\ /////�//%/ice =6270— �� — �� \� \ �---- —— ~~ —_--___—_—=-��\\\�\\SN. \\\\ \\.N\NNN\\o ___—_ //i ///,,// �__ - - - \- - -_- ��-r_---- -— _ \\\\\ \ \\ \ \ \ \\ \ N. \ �, / / // / / / .;11/1/1//////////Ill/H/1/ JJ /////i////// �-� � �f Z9— —_i fc _ _ _ _ - `,\ \\\�\\\� \- -,.. \`N. ��\\\O\\\\0�9\\��� Y \�_-- — %///��' %��j�/ '111�1��11/III // //� /,,/ \ \\\`_ — -_____ _-�;—�=`_ __ _ _ _ _ �� \\ \\\�\\\\\ ,,, \\°\\\\��\\\\ \ `� \ \\ // /20.///� // //-//1 \\\\\\\ \\�\�\\ `/- %%ii /i i���/i/ \\ \\ \— —__ \ -- \ -, —\`-_ I I IIII Hi !1111 I III 1111 III 1 III I 111 Illi;-5 II �__ 1111 JIl llllll%/8, ----- \\— ____ _�=_ _ �=,__ `—__-- __ _ --- \\\\\\\\\\\\\���\ ,-\.-�9\.\\N,, I I 111 / l 11 / - = -= - -- �,_ __---_-=- �` \\� \ \\\.\\\\Og\ 9 \ \\ \\ ////// / / I1 1 J 1 / / / / — _��\� ��\ \\s\\\\z9\\\\�\� \\ �``�\ \ \ / //o / /� JIM I(llllllll --/ —£�2\ ice^ ����� = — __ �_���--\� of\�\�zg���9�\\\\�\\-::,\`-\\\\\\�\\ \\\ \�\\ ��i/�1iii/i// �/ —/ _ \\\ '- \\ I ILII II1 1 -- , //// /i��/1 IIJ f 11/1111/ —_ — /� -�------- �o\ \\�\\\\ \\\ \\\\ \1Qp \ \ �� VI I 11 4? I1 11 / ~—_ ---- / - - - ----_— G \\z \ 9 \\\\\\\\\\\\ \\\� \ \ \ \ \\ -- /// / /�ii/ -\�;_—� \\\z9\�\\\ \ \\ \ \ 111111111IIf /�=------------------ hl \ 1 .,II1 111/II'�j JJ ///_ I I I I I lI 1 ,_ :-Y._ III 11 ! J !J // r - - _ - - - _ _ // / - r \ \*C. \ \\ �\ \\ \\\\ \\\\ \ �'\�\ \1 \ \ \ \ i'/4- �� 6 ii i /' \ I ! III 11 III`.<.I 1111111IIlI III ///��_-_-__^ -- � �—__—__- __ /'- r \ \\ \� �� \\\� \\ \ \\ \— / / / \ \ \ \\ \111 1 \ \ — / i//,// 1 1 I 1 / //- _ - _— _= s--- 1 \\\ \\\\ \\ �1 \\ / 1\ \ `�--_=-�=s= , s -E`�_< �\\\\\�\\\ I11f��//j/ \ �/ \11�1\I1 1� \::z1:,-- \ v1I1111I1111I1111I1111�!>IIlIll111111 �- /// \ \\ \ \ 11 1 1\ 11 11 I /i/i//e//_ 1 1111 111 1 I !1 l�J 1 I l \ \ \�/ /i /,/j///9��/\\\\\ III II 1 \'1 \\\:7,, 1 II 11 III11111_IIIII fI 11 1 1 1 !�� \ / \ 1 1 \- \ \� \`l l 1 1 11114111/1 -// / , /1- II III\ \ �I 1111 "���' III �/�/�/,//�� :::\ _# 1 \ ACf�ES \ \ x \ 1 / f III I I �III11111 IIIlI III\`;`;;:IIj111JIIIII11 I !I111 \r\J111J111JI11 ) 11 I ^�Iloll (111 1111 1 mJ 1 I 1 11 IlnJkol! 1111 !11111\ 1111111111 ��, \ 1111 1 111 2�'BASIN II11I1111� \ \\ \/)1 \ 1 \ \ �/1�111111111 11111111 III II 1 : II 1I I!1 ,,I \ , 1 \ l //, /ll 1 1 1111 I \11 /, / e \ // / /// I! 1 1 11 II \\\1 /ii/i // - 1 1111I I1111II \ \ BASINS 2 ! \ \o \ / //// / //l !lit JI11 1 II \//7,,,j j j/ /2.09 (III 11 1 I I I \ # 1 \ \ \ e 111 1I II11III \ \ s /////// / //ll///1 1 111 / /,�////I /////////// �// 11111 1 JI1 \1\ ///j/ //.Cn' 43.62 ACRES 5:'.11111111 1111111111111I \ 1 1 1 \ —\ \;aI/:;/N 1\ \\ II //1 11 �;' \\ II J l/l JJjlrll1 Jl^ 111 I IIJ11 1 1 1 \\\ �,I 1 1 \ ,o/ii /i//1/i/ii/,1 J JJJ! ; �j- \ , \ 11 1 !I / J 1 11117/////,/////////1///////// 1/JJ 1 I I I 111 I I II I y / / / / // / / / / / // 1 z 2.56 /- -� 1\.051 \ \ \ III I/ 11 !!J /1// /ll/ol// 1// !J // l / J f 111 111��1/1 1/l/lJJ/J/� l//ilillli/ l/// 1Il11 11II I J / II I I J \ \\ J/0/0//////// 1 I / 1 ;;: ///0////0/0/////1/11 1 I == lJ /0"//////// //// \ I 110%1%l�JJ1/J�JIIIJJI/ 1 23.08 1 3q� 21 1 1 BASIN 5 # 30 ACRES ,9\ 1\ // / / 1111 / 1/ 1J ,/, �,- l//1// / ,/ /\ ///i/ \ \ / / //l /l \ I / , /// 1 \ / //////////// \ N //i//i///l i 11 l///�/// I� ' i'% �/ / / t \ // // // / // / // ///i // / \/' // 2- \ \ /////////,/,// // //////z //� DATE \\ \ __ill / 1 ////////////j ' - 1 \ 1 / // / / / // // / / \ \ _\ \ \ v�__-/ll/0///1/�I/1/111^ 11�/I�1111/�°/!llllll/l/j/ l/ //�//11 /l/l�1/ i/�1///1111lJ l l// I 1 \ 11 J///li \ \ 0 73 0.87 t \ \ �/ / i///i,�/ ////,/// // ¢/ \ _<'-'l/////�lu \ ////// / cy / // / N, // //// / l //r I // / /�/// / / /////, / V//// V1 /1111 11 /l l�ol l 1111 111 ci / 111 l 1 / A 1 \ ll1 ull/i%il/ illi/////\11 / / / /\ ///'��; /,; LEGEND! \ //ii /i/ 1 /////7/// // ///�/ ///l/ t,~ �llllli�llliill�lilli�lllJ i /i / i/1/4/4///1/1/:////////1:///// // o��� j// 1\ \\/ ,/,//�//,/%�'` ///// // //� v /ill/ l/1/i/1 /i 11/ 7,////77)077,7,7,7,44 // // / / J/ // ///i//1////(;//://77;/://1/1/1/71 \ I--' / / /O// /1 .�`+, // // N / / '\ S 1 j oa ; \ / / /1 r//� // I /l l /7v,*11111,1\ l / o I y N // // / / // PROPOSED CONTOUR / // 1/ 11 l/l/11111/l 11 1 /�0l/l1 /4--: 1 °' a `° ..- /ti////o/ �// / //7///: // // /// /j/�'// l/lllo/ \ //O /// // // // //,, I I / \ / n rn m 4 1 % �� L /rO //'1/ /// / / /X / 5660 PROPOSED CONTOUR INTERVAL � /0/////,'"/"/////////,/,// / l //1 / o/// 1 1 �, G y // �/ / �,�// o/ /////// / // / 7 / / / / // /i n \ Co-i \ /o// /�a/ /, o // // / //� ' / / // / /// , , Tc FLppW PATH / • l11/l/ l ////\ :r ///////11/4://11///^4121: /:///// //// / 4// l// / k\\1\\\ \ / ,,; ,_-: J / , \ 1 1 1 \ \\ /– � ////' l lll/ 0/ //// 11 /1Illlili�l /i� 111 1 \ OH1 ! 1 l/ /l/�o l/l /\ \ ///%///�//, / ///o// — J i i i — TIME OF CONCENTRATION FLOW PATH //7 //0 / /h///// /,/ , / /r/////// /// //43 //CD p/i��ii/ /�// //°L// // / / / // / ry/ /ti /i // �' / /. POST DEVELOPMENT BASIN BOUNDARY 1111 llllll/ // II II / z / /// / ^ 1 ! 1 \ 1 1 \ \ \ -- / . ! 11 / ////// 11 / ` / 1 / vv c //l// ll//I//l_ ..,111/l 1/l// l/`° 1111 I A • / /j I1 1 /l j l/1 / 1 1 1 1 \ \ \ / ' // // / r /////// // /// / / ///, // / // //�// /ry��/ /O / // ///II // // ///////////,/,//o///,10) / //�/, // /./ // /////// // //o ////� //// \ - / l//llll1111 . \ 1 ////////// //// /\ \\ �` - , 1/�%/��% - f JJJI/J11/1J^ ¢'"_l / /////; ,//1,/ 11 ! \ / //// / // / ///��/ ////// 7 /cii 11 // l 1 1 Ii / ! \ 1 \ \ ///// / �/ / // ///////,// / / / , / r / ///////// ////////////////////////////� o - \\ ////��, / ///i/�� // 1 / / ���/ /// /1fjj/r \ /c/rte 1 �/� // U �i,//�///,/,\ �'%''�111f11J///II 'i �JJIIJ/JJJ ,:> .1l111 t 1 //i/ J II ! \ \ �, 1 \// // // / �/ // �/ /,i/// ,� 1 J J //7/1/1//1/111/(11////// .V J I /ll r /l l 111 ll JJ if ///////// 11r JJJ 1//i//�«�/ ///�//// /� U l J 11 r /0/0//////// 0 J BASIN #3 / 1 11 1111 !J l // �r (1 (<r� / ////,/,i � i/ \ ll1 /,/ //l//// 1 ` /111 fill/!!/J !f(f 1\�/ /� z/,/ BASIN # AREA W ;�--� Il f //llllll/l Il //// 1 / // 1� ��� _Y �111I111� l//�////1//�%l/ 1 11 1111 J 11 11 1 ( /// / / ��� : / t / / \ 111111 t , 1l` <\` f �� I1�11f1111 \ I 6.90y ACRES I III ill III II Illy II I \ .._ 1 11)11011111011/1111111 11111111 / // I I I t vvv vv v — / / /,/ / / I `\ /i / Q25 Q100 - \�- .,' /11111 j 1�II1I1111 Itl\ \\\\\\��� _;;/;;%%' I \,_x//11 \\ �lil/J JJJ, �l '�� =-/i/ I _=�/11,11VAv�/,��y,,l / / d 111/1 l _� A� , OOP v_ ! / \ 11 I1 1 I \A\\ i�-/-- / /� •; 1 rc P / 1 Fro 1IJI111II1, 11 111 I, 1, v i��'/; \ q 1 \� \ \ —_� 5v�v���- ��i �J Y 11� j/�t 11 111 �+ 9!67 11 J 111 t \ = -- / / ... 12.75 1 v '>� 1 J JI/11 111111111111 }) �I J - _, // /, / 1111' y ) _ \� \�;`� �// \\ \\\� -_-_// .�\\ 1h j I� / 111///// /1!lir\ \ 1/ \ y llllll/JJ 1I/1 / /��, -ice \ ,1/4///1.1,111/J J/ / \ �- /,/ / Ill JJJ J l �/_________"7:: -\\•\„....,..„./7,___„„______== -- �\\\� // -- _ ' BASIN #4 \ ////////I/ !///llllll 1 J // _-%%/ / 1 �IIII� �\�\`�–F`i`g �//�I �- -�- 1 /i/l//J/ \� �_/// ,11p \,___� ` �_ , - �- // / � \� DESIGN POINT 2 - __.. 9\73 ACRES ,//,i�/i�,i/ice , 1 //// /� / ///// I JI // � `. ` �_ - 1 l \ \\\ - /%//1 1 / / �\ \` z\ \ \\ - � . 5 7 15.71 / // /i// / /o / /dc / % / %/�ir,i /ik - z / z-P2/77// //��/iio�// // t / // i OWERS PIT CONCRETE BATCH LANT COMP PLAN AMENDMENT ;ARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO POST -DEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE BA, `_ \\\ \ -\\\ \ \ \ �N\ \\ \ \ \\\\ \ \ \sae / _ ``\ 1 -\ ,�\^ \h\\V`�`=Tc FCO{YP`- / //i< - \\\\\\\\"9\\' _- % /, 1 \��\` -� -� _. _- iii/i%ii��i `-_ _� \\\ \\\\\\\ -. ,-.` — ` \°0?� `\� \`----____---.----__-_-_-_L--__------> / //i/'�i / % ----_---c----____ —<\\\ \\. \\\\ iii/ 1CY S - _,_,` ` _ \ DESIGN POINT 1 -' `- '\ `-- = % �� / -a` -Ja ---;.---__N \— x —/ — _ ' - ��_ �— ` ` \ \ — L` 100 - - - `' GRAPHIC 0 50 100 SCALE 200 400 ` - - - --` ` `-�� \ �\ ( IN FEET) `` \ - — 1 inch = 100 ft. n d EXHIBIT 2: DATE: June 24, 2011 JOB NO. 11016 M:\3100DWGS\11016\comp plan111016-DRAINAGE.DWG SHEET 1 OF 1 Contractors Storage Yard Application 12015 Garfield County Access Permit (attached) 261 Page laGarfield County Application for Driveway Permit Person Obtaining Permit: Crystal Ranch Corp Application Date: 7/16/2012 County Road Number: 103 District: Glenwood Permit Number: GRBI D-1 S Termination Date: 7/31/2013 Inspector: Mike Prelnn hereby requests permission and authority from the Board of County Commissioner's to construct a driveway approach (es) on the right-of-way off of County Road, 103,490' +/- North of HWY 82, located on the West side of road for the purpose of obtaining access to property. Applicant submits herewith for the consideration and approval of the Board of County Commissioners, a sketch of the proposed installation showing all the necessary specification detail including, 1. Frontage of lot along road. 2, Distance from centerline of road to property line. 3. Number of driveways requested 4. Width of proposed driveways and angle of approach. 5. Distance from driveway to road intersection, if any. 6. Size and shape of area separating driveways if more than one approach. 7. Setback distance of building(s) and other structure improvements. 8. No unloading of equipment on county road, any damage caused to county road will be repaired at subdivision expense. 9. Responsible for two years from the date of completion. General Provisions 1) The applicant represents all parties in interest, and affirms that the driveway approach (es) is to be constructed by him for the bona fide purpose of securing access to his property and not for the purpose of doing business or servicing vehicles on the road right of way. 2) The applicant shall furnish alI labor and materials, perforin all work, and pay all costs in connection with the construction of the driveway(s). All work shall be completed within thirty (30) days of the permit date. 3) The type of construction shall be as designated and/or approved by the Board of County Commissioners or their representative and all materials used shall be of satisfactory quality and subject to inspection and approval of the Board of County Commissioners or their representative. 4) The traveling public shall be protected during the installation with proper warning signs and signals and the Board of County Commissioners and their duly appointed agents and employee shall be held harmless against any action for personal injury or property damage sustained by any reason of the exercise of the Permit. 5) The Applicant shall assume responsibility for the removal or clearance of snow, ice, or sleet upon any portion of the driveway approach (es) even though deposited on the driveway(s) in the course of the County snow removal operations. 6) In the event it becomes necessary to remove any right-of-way fence, the posts on either side of the entrance shall be surely braced before the fence is cut to prevent any slacking of the remaining fence and all posts and wire removed shall be nirned over to the District Road Supervisor of the Board of County Conunissioners. 7) No revisions or additions shall be made to the driveway(s) or its appurtenances on the right-of-way without written permission of the Board of County Commissioners. 8) Provisions and specifications outlined herein shall apply on all roads under the jurisdiction of the Board of County Commissioners of Garfield County, Colorado, and the Specifications, set forth on the attached hereof and incorporated herein as conditions hereof. 9) Final inspection of driveway will be required upon completion and must be approved by person issuing permit or representative of person issuing permit. The inspection and sign off must be done prior to any CO from the Building and Planning Department being issued. Special Conditions: 1. Driveway Width- 48' 2. Culvert required? True Size: 18 inch by 150' 3. Asphalt or concrete pad required? True Size of pad: Entire Drive is Aspalt 4. Gravel portion required? False Length: N/A 5. Trees, brush and/or fence need to be reproved for visibility? False 6. Distance and Direction:N/A 7. Certified Traffic Control Required? True 8. Work zone signs required? True 9. Stop Sign Required at entrance to County Road In signing this application and upon receiving authorization and permission to install the driveway approach (es) described herein the Applicant signifies that he has read, understands and accepts the foregoing provisions and conditions and agrees to construct the driveway(s) in accordance with the accompanying specification plan reviewed and approved by the Board of County Commissioners. Signed: va.c r htiatx (at" Address: 0c) w ., iT,C'0 rr,a2 Telephone Number: a10 Permit granted 7/16/2012, subject to the provisions, specifications and conditions stipulated herein. For Board-6f'aunty Corn i issioners' of Garfield County, Colorado: Representative of Garfield County Road and Bridge Signature Specifications 1. A driveway approach is understood to be that portion of the county road right -of way between the pavement edge and the property line that is designed and used for the interchange of traffic between the roadway and abutting property. 2. At any intersection, a driveway shall be restricted for a sufficient distance from the intersection to preserve the normal and safe movement of traffic. (It is recommended for rural residence entrances that a minimum intersection clearance of 50 feet be provided and for rural commercial entrances a minimum of 100 feet be provided.) 3. All entrances and exits shall be so located and constructed that vehicles approaching or using them will be able to obtain adequate sight distance in both directions along the county road in order to maneuver safely and without interfering with county road traffic. 4. The Applicant shall not be permitted to erect any sign or display material, either fixed or movable, on or extending over any portion of the county road right-of-way. 5. Generally, no more than one approach shall be allowed any parcel or property the frontage of which is less than one hundred (100) feet. Additional entrances or exits for parcels having a frontage in excess of one hundred 100) feet shall be permitted only after showing of actual convenience and necessity. 6. All driveways shall be so located that the flared portion adjacent to the traveled way will not encroach upon adjoining property. 7. No commercial driveway shall have a width greater than thirty (30) feet measured at right angles to the centerline of the driveway except as increased by permissible radii. No noncommercial driveway shall have a width greater than twenty (20) feet measured at right angles to the centerline of the driveway, except as increased by permissible radii. 8 The axis of an approach to the road may be at a right angle to the centerline of the county road and of any angle between ninety (90) degrees and sixty (60) degrees but shall not be less than sixty (60) degrees. Adjustment will be made according to the type of traffic to be served and other physical conditions. 9. The construction of parking or servicing areas on the county road right-of-way is specifically prohibited, Commercial establishments for customer vehicles should provide off -the -road parking facilities. 10. The grade of entrance and exit shall slope downward and away from the road surface at the same rate as the normal shoulder slope and for a distance equal to the width of the shoulder but in no case less than twenty (20) feet from the pavement edge. Approach grades are restricted to not more than ten percent (10%). 1 I . All driveways and approaches shall be so constructed that they shall not interfere with the drainage system of the street or county road. The Applicant will be required to provide, at his own expense, drainage structures at entrances and exits, which will become an integral part of the existing drainage system. The Board of County Commissioners or their representative, prior to installation, must approve the dimensions and types of all drainage structures. Note: This permit shall be made available at the site where and when work is being done, A work sketch or drawing of the proposed driveway(s) nuist accompany= application. No permit will be issued without drawing, blueprint, or sketch. Contractors Storage Yard Application 12015 Fifth Amendment for Ready Mix Plant Lease Location (attached) 271 Page FIFTH AMENDMENT TO LEASE AGREEMENT THIS FIFTH AMENDMENT TO LEASE AGREEMENT (this "Fifth Amendment") is made and entered into effective as of the L . day of March, 2014, by and between CRYSTAL RANCH CORP., a Colorado corporation ("Lessor"), and OLDCASTLE SW GROUP, INC., a Colorado corporation ("Lessee"). RECITALS WHEREAS, Lessor (as current assignee of the Estate of John G. Powers, Deceased) and Lessee (as current assignee of Roaring Fork Sand & Gravel Company, Inc.) are all of the parties to that certain Lease Agreement dated April 19, 2001 (the "Original Lease Agreement") covering the portion of the John Powers Ranch in Garfield County, Colorado that is more particularly described on Exhibit A to the Lease Agreement (the "Leased Premises"), as amended by First Amendment to Lease Agreement dated June 22, 2001 (the "First Amendment"), by letter agreements dated October 30, 2002 and May 21, 2003 (the "Letter Amendments"), by Second Amendment to Lease Agreement dated June 30, 2008 (the "Second Amendment"), by Third Amendment to Lease Agreement dated September 18, 2009 (the "Third Amendment"), and by Fourth Amendment to Lease Agreement dated November 15, 2010 (the "Fourth Amendment"), and the Short Term Lease Extension dated effective April 28, 2013 and Second Short Term Lease Extension dated September 13, 2013 and Third Short Tern Lease Extension dated October 18, 2013, the Fourth Short Term Lease Extension dated November 20, 2013 and Fifth Short Term Lease Extension dated effective January 24, 2014 (collectively, as amended by this Fifth Amendment, the "Lease Agreement", or the "Lease"); and WHEREAS, pursuant to the terms of that certain Assignment and Assumption of Leases Agreement dated July 19, 2013 between Lafarge West, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Lafarge") and Lessee, with Lessor's prior consent, Lessee assumed the Lease Agreement from Lafarge, excepting those reclamation matters for which Lafarge assumed continuing responsibility under and pursuant to the terms of that certain Continuing Reclamation Obligations Agreement between Lessor and Lafarge dated effective April 29, 2013 (hereafter, the "Continuing Reclamation Obligations Agreement"); and WHEREAS, Lessor and Lessee desire by this instrument to amend the Term of the Lease Agreement in several respects and to adopt and approve various other amendments to the Lease Agreement. AGREEMENT NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements herein contained and for other good and valuable considerations, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Lessor and Lessee agree that from and after the execution of this Fifth Amendment by both parties, the Lease Agreement shall be and hereby is amended as follows: 1. Term. Paragraph 2 of the Lease Agreement ("Term"), as previously amended in the Fourth Amendment, is hereby replaced and superseded in its entirety to read as follows: "2. The current term of this Lease shall expire and terminate on November 30, 2028 (the "Extended Batch Plant Term"). Until April 28, 2028 of the Extended Batch Plant Term (the "Extended Batch Plant Operations Term"), Lessee may continue its permitted batch plant operations and activities on the Further Revised Leased Premises described in Section 2 of this Fifth Amendment (but not on any other portion of the original or subsequently amended Leased Premises), including without limitation concrete production and processing, truck and equipment washing, trucking, deliveries, pickup, storage/stockpiles of mined materials, product recycling, dust control, and other ancillary uses reasonably related to these permitted uses (collectively, the "Batch Plant Operations"). The first paragraph of Paragraph 3 of the Lease Agreement ("Permitted Use; Operation") is hereby amended to reflect this limitation. Lessee agrees that by the expiration of the Extended Batch Plant Operations Term, it will conclude all Batch Plant Operations on the Further Revised Leased Premises. Lessee agrees that by the expiration of the Extended Batch Plant Term Lessee will (i) have removed all of Lessee's remaining equipment and buildings and other improvements from the Further Revised Leased Premises, (ii) have performed and completed the Batch Plant Area Reclamation Plan obligations described on Exhibits C and D attached hereto and made a part hereof by this reference, and (iii) have fully and completely vacated the Further Revised Leased Premises for all purposes excepting reclamation maintenance activities described elsewhere in the Lease. It is understood that MLRB acceptance of such Batch Plant Area Reclamation Plan activities may occur after November 30, 2028 and Lessee shall be allowed to continue reclamation maintenance activities until such approval occurs_ It is expressly understood and agreed that throughout the Extended Batch Plant Term, it is Lessee's responsibility to conduct its various operations in a manner consistent with applicable Garfield County regulations and approvals, including without limitation BOCC Land Use Change Permit for the Continued Operation of a Concrete Batch Plant known as the Power's Pit Concrete Batch Plant, issued in accordance with Resolution No. 2011-77 of the Garfield County BOCC, as recorded May 14, 2013 as Reception No. 835254 in the Office of the Clerk and Recorder of Garfield County, Colorado. In the event the County raises objections or concerns with respect to activities of Lessee on the Further Revised Leased Premises during the Extended Batch Plant Term, it shall be Lessee's responsibility to take such actions as may be necessary 2 or appropriate to bring its operations into compliance with County requirements, and Lessor shall have no liability to Lessee for any losses or damages that may be sustained by Lessee as a consequence of County action or inaction with respect to such matters." 2. Further Revised Leased Premises. Effective immediately and continuing throughout the Extended Batch Plant Term of the Lease, the description of the Leased Premises set forth in Paragraph 1 of the Lease Agreement and on Exhibit A thereto is replaced and superseded in its entirety by the Further Revised Leased Prernises depicted and described on the 5th Amended Exhibit A attached to this Fifth Amendment and made a part hereof by this reference. The Further Revised Leased Premises shall include, and Lessor hereby grants to Lessee for the duration of the Extended Batch Plant Terra, a non-exclusive easement over and along the CR 103 Access Easement (containing 0.913 acres, more or less) depicted and described on the attached 5th Amended Exhibit A for purposes of all forms of surface access and travel to and from the Further Revised Leased Premises, for underground utilities serving the Further Revised Leased Premises, and for purposes of maintenance of such CR 103 Access Easement. The parties mutually understand and agree that at any time and from time to time during the Extended Batch Plant Term, Lessor shall have the unlimited right and authority to lease or sell portions of the original Leased Premises, but expressly excluding any portion of the Further Revised Leased Premises, to third parties, and may grant non-exclusive access rights to such third parties over and along the CR 103 Access Easement for access to areas other than the Further Revised Leased Premises. All references in the Lease Agreement to the "Leased Premises" are hereby revised to mean the Further Revised Leased Premises and no other portion of the property previously subject to the Lease Agreement. Throughout the Extended Batch Plant Term, but terminating upon expiration or other termination of the Extended Batch Plant Term, Lessee shall be responsible for maintaining and repairing the CR 103 Access Easement to its point of entry into the Further Revised Leased Premises in a good, functional, safe and attractive condition, at Lessee's sole cost and expense and as deteiuiined by Lessee using its commercially reasonable judgment. In the event Lessor leases or conveys a portion or portions of the original Leased Premises to third party users, Lessor shall be responsible for reimbursing Lessee for such users' fair share of the CR 103 Access Easement maintenance costs based on the relative areas of the original Leased Premises occupied by all users including Lessee, and Lessor agrees to incorporate such shared maintenance obligations in its lease or sale arrangements with third party users. Lessor shall be responsible for collecting the shared maintenance costs from the third party users and for remitting the same to Lessee on a timely and regular basis. 3. Rent. Paragraph 4 of the Lease Agreement ("Rent") is amended and superseded in its entirety to read as follows: "4. (a) Ground Rent. As rental and consideration for the leasing of the Further Revised Leased Premises to Lessee during the Extended Batch Plant Term of the Lease, Lessee shall and hereby covenants and agrees to pay to Lessor a monthly rental in the amount of $16,513.63 per month commencing on the first day of November, 2013 and continuing on the first day of each succeeding calendar month during the entire remaining Extended Batch Plant Term of the Lease (the "Ground Rent"). On November 1, 2014 and on the first day of November throughout the entire remaining Extended Batch Plant Term of the Lease, the Ground Rent shall be automatically increased by (i) the increase in the Consumer Price Index — All Urban Consumers — All Cities published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor during the immediately preceding 12 -month period, or (ii) three percent (3 %), whichever is greater, which rental increases shall be cumulative. (b) Payable To. Ground Rents, and any other amounts that may become due and payable by Lessee to Lessor under this Lease Agreement shall be paid to Lessor via electronic delivery to the Crystal Ranch Corp. account at Alpine Bank, 0350 Highway 133. Carbondale, CO 81623, Routing No. 102103407, Acct No. 4040761516, or to such other account or person and address as Lessor may designate by written notice to Lessee." 4. Water Rights. Paragraph 5 of the Lease Agreement ("Water Supply for Lessee Operations; Waste Water), as previously amended. is amended and superseded in its entirety to read as follows: "5. Water Rights; Waste Water. By this Fifth Amendment, Lessor hereby leases to Lessee sufficient water and water rights — and the pipelines, fixtures, equipment, facilities, and easements associated therewith — together with a proportionate interest in the augmentation plan and sources of augmentation water decreed in Case No. 92CW304. District Court. Water Division 5, for industrial use by Lessee in connection with its continuing Batch Plant Operations on the Further Revised Leased Premises and its eventual reclamation and reclamation maintenance activities on said Further Revised Leased Premises, including the following: 17.0 acre-feet per year (diversions) for Batch Plant Operations (for industrial and eventual reclamation uses, as applicable) consistent with the decree entered in Case No. 92CW304. Of the 17.0 acre feet per year of diversions, 13.52 acre-feet are augmented pursuant to the decree entered in Case No. 92CW304 pursuant to a water allotment contract with the Basalt Water Conservancy District, Contract No. 31, as amended. Lessee shall be solely responsible for Lessee's excess out -of -priority industrial depletions taken by Lessee and not otherwise augmented pursuant to the decree entered in Case No. 92CW304. Water deliveries to serve the Further Revised Leased Premises may occur via any one or a combination of the below listed water rights, as needed, which Lessee shall divert using the existing 10 -inch line that crosses under Highway 82 until the leak in the existing parallel 4 -inch line is repaired by Lafarge (at Lafarge's sole cost and expense, without disruption to Lessee's operations on the Further Revised Leased 4 Premises), upon and after the occurrence of which Lessee shall switch over the exclusive use of said 4 -inch line for all water deliveries to the Further Revised Leased Premises for industrial uses (and eventual reclamation uses), to wit: * James Reservoir Industrial Enlargement, in the amount of 8.28 acre-feet for industrial uses (and eventual reclamation uses); * Martin Ditch, in the amount of 3.0 c.f.s. for industrial uses (and eventual reclamation uses); * Kelso Ditch Industrial Enlargement, in the amount of 3.0 c.f.s. for industrial uses (and eventual reclamation uses); and * 13.52 acre feet of water delivered from storage pursuant to the Basalt Water Conservancy District Contract No. 31, as amended Lessee understands and agrees that until the leak in the 4 -inch line (located somewhere within the Further Revised Leased Premises) is repaired and the line is operational, Lessee. Lafarge (for reclamation/irrigation purposes) and Lessor (for any use occurring outside of the Further Revised Leased Premises) shall share the use of the 10 -inch line and the water delivered therein, provided that, without additional cost to Lessee. Lessee shall at all times have sufficient water to conduct Lessee's operations on the Further Revised Leased Premises. Lessee further understands and agrees that Lessor reserves to itself and any assignee of Lessor (including Lafarge) the irrigation component of the water rights described above, together with any related augmentation credits, for any purpose including but not limited to irrigation of lands (including reclaimed areas) previously mined within the Powers gravel pit area. Lessor further reserves the right to connect to the 10 -inch line through the Further Revised Leased Premises, provided that such connection does not interfere with Lessee's operations, for purpose of diverting water for any use that may be made by Lessor or its assignee occurring outside the Further Revised Leased Premises. Lessee agrees to pay the annual costs and expenses associated with its use of the 13.52 acre feet of water delivered from storage pursuant to the Basalt Water Conservancy District Contract No. 31 during the leasehold period. Lessee shall comply with the laws of the State of Colorado and the rules and regulations of the Colorado Division of Water Resources in the administration and use of the leased water rights. It is expressly understood and agreed that Lessee is responsible for the proper and lawful disposal and discharge of all waste water produced in connection with the Batch Plant Operations of Lessee (and of any permitted sublessee) upon or in connection with the Further Revised Leased Premises. Subject to the terms and conditions herein, Lessor may from time to time file such water rights applications or amendments, including without limitation applications 5 to augment wells andlor for altercate points of diversion, as it may consider necessary or appropriate with regard to the above described water rights (or any of them) being leased to Lessee, and/or with regard to other water rights associated with the remainder of the Powers Ranch property. Any such water rights applications or amendments shall not interfere with, Emit, or injure Lessee's use of the leased water rights and infrastructure and will not interfere with, limit, or injure Lessee's operations on the Further Revised Leased Premises and Lessee's reclamation activities on the Further Revised Leased Premises. Any water rights applications or amendments by Lessor shall not impair Lessee's permitted activities/operations or uses of water or water rights under this Fifth Amendment to Lease Agreement, and, if such impairment occurs, Lessor shall make Lessee whole by immediately providing additional or supplemental water and water rights to Lessee at Lessor's sole cost and expense." 5. Operating Mine Assessments. The following sentence is added at the end of Paragraph 7 of the Lease Agreement ("Taxes"): "Finally, Lessee shall reimburse Lessor for any additional assessments that may be levied against the Leased Premises, if any, for calendar year 2013 as a result of Garfield County's classification and assessment of said property for ad valorem taxation purposes as an operating mine." 6. Mining and Reclamation of Further Revised Leased Premises by Lessee. Paragraph 11 of the Lease Agreement ("Mining and Reclamation of Leased Premises by Lessee"), as previously amended, is further amended in its entirety to read as follows: "11. Mining and Reclamation of Further Revised Leased Premises by Lessee. (a) Lessee agrees to conduct its operations and activities on the Further Revised Leased Premises in strict accordance and compliance with all requirements, conditions and provisions of (i) the MLRB Permit, specifically including the Mining Plans, the Reclamation Plans, and the Reclamation Plan Maps contained therein (as amended by the Batch Plant Area Reclamation Plan attached hereto as Exhibit C), (ii) the Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Act, C.R.S. Sections 34-32-101, et. seq. (hereafter the "Act"), specifically including without limitation the requirements of Section 34-32-116 of the Act, (iii) the Batch Plant Area Reclamation Plan prepared by Sopris Engineering, LLC under date of November 18, 2013 and attached hereto as Exhibit C and made a part hereof by this reference, and (iv) the Final Condition of Batch Plant/Lease Area described on Exhibit D attached hereto and made a part hereof by this reference, as said Exhibits C and D may be approved and/or modified by the MLRB as provided in subparagraph (b) below (said Exhibits C and D are hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Batch Plant Area Reclamation Plan"). The MLRB Permit, the Act, and the Batch Plant Area Reclamation Plan are herein collectively referred to as the "Reclamation Standards". Lessee expressly assumes and agrees to perform in a full and timely manner and at its sole cost and expense all of the obligations and responsibilities of the permittee/operator under the MLRB Permit that pertain to the Further Revised Leased Premises, specifically including without 6 limitation all reclamation/site rehabilitation requirements, obligations and responsibilities thereunder that pertain to the Further Revised Leased Premises and the full and complete performance and implementation of the Batch Plant Area Reclamation Plan. (b) Promptly following the Reclamation Substantial Completion Date as defined in the Continuing Reclamation Obligations Agreement, and the MLRP's acceptance of Lafarge's amendment to the MLRB Permit causing the release from such permit of all portions of the real property subject to the MLRB Permit other than the Further Revised Leased Premises, provided that if Lessee is then required to have the MLRB Permit to conduct Lessee's operations on the Further Revised Lease Area, Lessee shall (i) assume from Lafarge the MLRB Permit solely as to obligations with respect to the Further Revised Leased Premises and no other area or obligations under the MLRB Permit, (ii) file with the MLRB a "Transfer of Permit and Successor of Operator" and (iii) if legally required, prepare and submit to the MLRB an application to amend the MLRB Permit in order to incorporate therein the Batch Plant Area Reclamation Plan, and shall diligently pursue the approval of any such permit amendment by the MLRB. Lessor agrees to cooperate in such amendment process to the extent necessary or appropriate. If MLRB modifies the Batch Plant Area Reclamation Plan prior to its approval, then Lessee shall deliver a copy of such modified Batch Plant Area Reclamation Plan to Lessor for approval, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed and, if no response from Lessor is received by Lessee within twenty-one (21) days of delivery, such modified Batch Plant Area Reclamation Plan shall be deemed approved by Lessor. As used throughout this Fifth Amendment, the "Batch Plant Area Reclamation Plan" shall mean the Exhibit C Plan and/or Exhibit D Final Condition as approved and/or modified by DRMS. (c) In the event of any conflicts or inconsistencies between the requirements of the MLRB Permit, the Act, or the Batch Plant Area Reclamation Plan, the requirements, standards and conditions of the Batch Plant Area Reclamation Plan shall govern and control, except that in circumstances where the Batch Plant Area Reclamation Plan does not contain applicable requirements, standards or conditions, then the more stringent requirement of the MLRB Permit or the Act shall govern and control. In the event of any disagreement between Lessor and Lessee regarding the nature, extent, timing or any other aspect of the Reclamation Standards with which Lessee is required to coinply hereunder. (i) if the dispute involves an interpretation of the Batch Plant Area Reclamation Plan, then the parties or either of them may request that an independent third party professional engineer make such interpretation, and the decision of such engineer shall be binding upon Lessor and Lessee and the Batch Plant Area Reclamation Plan shall be performed in a manner consistent with that interpretation, or (ii) if the dispute involves an interpretation of the MLRB Permit or the Act, then the parties or either of them may request the MLRB to designate one of its staff to make such interpretation, and the decision of such representative shall be binding upon Lessor and Lessee and the reclamation/rehabilitation work in question shall be performed in a manner consistent with that interpretation. Notwithstanding the 7 foregoing, nothing herein shall require Lessee to violate the MLRB Permit, the Act. or the Batch Plant Area Reclamation Plan. (d) Lessee's reclamation/rehabilitation obligations and responsibilities under this Lease Agreement shall survive the expiration of the term of the Lease (including the Extended Batch Plant Term) and/or any other termination of the Lease or of Lessee's possessory rights hereunder. Further, Lessee shall be responsible for maintaining all reclamation performed upon or in connection with the Further Revised Leased Premises for a period of two (2) years following the final Lease expiration or other termination date. During this two (2) year "site maintenance period," Lessee shall be responsible for maintenance and repair of the temporary irrigation system installed by Lessee during the reclamation process, repair of erosion damage, reseeding of areas that have not established appropriate stands of grass species, and replacement of plantings as required to achieve a healthy live planting that equals seventy-five percent (75%) of the originally specified planting. Notwithstanding expiration or other termination of the final Lease term, Lessor shall provide Lessee access to the Further Revised Leased Premises for the performance of the above obligations or for the performance of other obligations that may be imposed by the MLRB. (e) Lessee has delivered and Lessor has accepted a bond issued by Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland in the face amount of 5165,000.00 dated March 2014 (the "Reclamation Bond"). which Reclamation Bond shall remain in place unless said surety notifies Lessor that the Reclamation Bond shall be cancelled as of the date that is 30 days from the date of such notice. If such notice is timely sent, then Lessor shall immediately notify Lessee, and Lessee shall have twenty (20) calendar days to provide a replacement bond meeting the same requirements as the Reclamation Bond. If Lessee fails to produce such replacement bond within twenty (20) calendar days of Lessor's notice, then Lessor shall have the irrevocable right to call the Reclamation Bond prior to the expiry date and to hold the drawn funds in an interest-bearing account until substitute security acceptable to Lessor is provided by Lessee, at which time Lessor shall immediately release the drawn funds, including accrued interest, to Lessee. In the event Lessee breaches its performance of the Reclamation Standards herein which would entitle Lessor to draw upon the Reclamation Bond (see the terms and conditions of subparagraph (g) below), then Lessor shall have the right to draw upon the Reclamation Bond in order to complete the performance of Lessee's reclamation obligations hereunder. (f) The Reclamation Bond shall remain in full force and effect throughout the remaining Extended Batch Plant. Term of the Lease, i.e. through November 30, 2028 or such earlier Lease expiration or termination date as provided herein, and throughout the two (2) year Lessee site maintenance period following said Lease termination date. On March 1, 2016, and every two years thereafter during the remaining Extended Batch Plant Term of the Lease, the then -face amount of the Reclamation Bond shall be increased (but not decreased) by the increase in the CPI over the previous two (2) year period or by three percent (3%) per year, whichever sum is greater, If Lessee fails to provide Lessor with a new or amended Reclamation Bond in the adjusted amount prior 8 to March 1, 2016 (or prior to March 1 of each two year period thereafter), then Lessor may draw on the existing Reclamation Bond at any time after said adjustment date and hold the drawn funds in an interest-bearing account until substitute security acceptable to Lessor is provided by Lessee. at which time the drawn funds shall be immediately released to Lessee. In the event a breach occurs in the performance by Lessee of the Reclamation Standards herein, then Lessor shall have the right to draw upon the drawn funds in order to complete the performance of Lessee's reclamation obligations hereunder. (g) In the event that during the term of this Lease (i.e. through December 31, 2028 or such earlier expiration or termination date as may be provided for herein) or during the two (2) year Lessee site maintenance period following the Lease termination or expiration date, Lessee fails to perform any one or more of its obligations under this Paragraph 11, then prior to taking any other action, Lessor shall give Lessee written notice of such default together with a demand that Lessee cure the violation. In the event Lessee has not cured the violation within thirty (30) days following the giving of such notice of default by Lessor, or if such violation is not reasonably capable of being cured with a thirty (30) day period, Lessee has not commenced steps to diligently cure such violation, then Lessor and its agents shall have the right, but never the obligation, to enter upon the Further Revised. Leased Premises and to perform such work and to do any and all other things necessary or appropriate to cure the violation and to perform and complete all of Lessee's remaining obligations and responsibilities under the Reclamation Standards, and to draw upon the Reclamation Bond (or upon any drawn funds) for purposes of paying or reimbursing the actual and direct costs incurred by Lessor in doing so. (h) Upon expiration or other termination of the Lease and of the two (2) year Lessee site maintenance period and the performance and completion of all of Lessee's obligations and responsibilities in compliance with the Reclamation Standards, Lessee shall promptly release the Reclamation Bond (or any remaining drawn funds) to Lessee." 7. Replacement of Previous Reclamation Plans for Further Revised Leased Premises. All previous Reclamation Plans set forth in earlier versions of this Lease Agreement, as such Plans may affect the Further Revised Leased Premises, shall be and hereby are superseded and replaced in their entirety by the Batch Plant Area Reclamation Plan attached hereto collectively as Exhibits C and D and made a part hereof by this reference. 8. Continuing Reclamation Obligations Agreement. Lessor and Lessee acknowledge and agree that the Reclamation Substantial Completion Date set forth in Paragraph 2 of the Continuing Reclamation Obligations Agreement has not yet been certified to by Yancy Nichols, the Project Engineer, and that the anticipated substantial completion date thereunder is now June 30, 2014. Lafarge remains responsible for the performance of the Stage One Reclamation and the Stage Two Reclamation, as set forth in Paragraph 2 of said Agreement. 9 9. Remaining CR 103 Access Construction Items. Lessee agrees to reimburse Lessor for the reasonable fees and expenses incurred and paid by Lessor from and after July 13, 2013 for work performed by Sopris Engineering and other consultants (including, without limitation, Doug Pratte of The Land Studio) in connection with the completion of the CR 103 ROW Vacation process with the County and cooperate with Lessor in obtaining the CR 103 ROW Vacation. Lessee agrees to pay Sopris Engineering directly for all reasonable fees and expenses billed to Lessee after the date hereof (and for unpaid invoices for previous work, if any) for work performed by Sopris Engineering or by Doug Pratte of The Land Studio in connection with the completion of the CR 103 ROW Vacation process, and further agrees to continue to cooperate with Lessor in obtaining the CR 103 ROW Vacation. 10. Lease Area Berm Installation. Lessee further agrees to complete the construction and installation of the Lease Area Berm along the northerly and westerly boundaries of the Further Revised Leased Premises as depicted and detailed on Exhibit B attached hereto and made a part hereof by this reference, to the reasonable satisfaction of design engineer Sopris Engineering, no later than June 30, 2014, at Lessee's sole cost and expense. 11. Other Amendments. Each of the following Paragraphs of the Lease Agreement, are deleted in their entirety and replaced with "Reserved": (a) Paragraphs 10 and 12 of the Original Lease Agreement; (b) Paragraphs 1, 2, 3. 4, 5 and 7 of the First Amendment; (c) Each of the Letter Agreements; (d) Paragraph 1 of the Second Amendment; (e) Paragraphs 4 and 6 of the Third Amendment; and (f) Paragraphs 2, 5 and 9 of the Fourth Amendment. 12. Notice. In the "Notice" provisions of Paragraph 17 of the Lease Agreement, as previously amended, notice to Lessee shall be addressed to Oldcastle SW Group, Inc., 2273 River Road, Grand Junction, CO 81502, Facsimile No.: 970-991- 6610, Attention: President, with copies to: Oldcastle Law Group, 900 Ashwood Parkway, Suite 600, Atlanta, GA 30338-4780, Attention: General Counsel. Facsimile: (770) 392-5305" 13. Notice and Right to Cure. The notices and rights to cure provided for in Paragraph 16 (headed "Default; Remedies") of the Lease Agreement shall remain in full force and effect and shall apply to all terms, conditions, and provisions of this Fifth Amendment. 10 14. No Other Amendments; Effect on Prior Agreements. Except as expressly amended or modified by this Fifth Amendment, the parties ratify and confirm all of the terms, conditions, and provisions of the Lease Agreement (as previously amended). To the extent any term, condition, or provision of the Lease Agreement or any amendment thereto conflicts with this Fifth Amendment, then this Fifth Amendment shall govern and control, [Signature Pages Follow] 11 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Fifth Amendment to Lease Agreement effective as of the date first set forth above. LESSOR: Crystal Ranch Corp,, a Colo a corporation Barbara J. !pgood, President STATE OF A COUNTY OF (71--i- r ) ss. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 7c1 day of March, 2014, by Barbara J. Hapgood as President of Crystal Ranch Corp., a Colorado corporation. Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires: $C , / lc' Notary Public (Lessee Execution on Following Page] SIGNATURE PAGE TO FIFTH AMENDMENT LESSEE: Oldcastle SW Group, Inc., a Colorado corporation By: Its: )/; �lC5ed- STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ss. COUNTY OFA ) The foregoing instrument was ,ajcknow edged before me this day of April, 2014, by Fele(J,�'�;cau �2 as V f e /-1ie„agid= of Oldcastle SW Group, Inc., a Colorado corporation. Witness my band and official seal. My commission expires: !`/fig P2f ._..:` tref/ 7) ),� Notary Public GENEVIEVE M. BLECHA NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF COLORADO 4 NOTARY ID #19914003259 My Commission Expires April 4, 2015 SIGNATURE PAGE TO FIFTH AMENDMENT wu y g i o o n U { nP \ Q79 Fi C77• z n' a fT R2 m z oro o 00 N o z ssai m wan 3arle MVO 1aaJ alen6s (gL 6f Bal.I.1.7 c % :roe °=wW. ,gym. TXP. -� c� a� �"° ...v 82a-�' -.0:4 e=a 2 m7rozm n� 4avw m ^ m m ] #onw wY ���n m8a -n•��n 2 d�"'n'rr sro�iy �a4 lg oI15,ga8acc.' .z •, 9] n 6 L m n n ;1,7, N i^ . m� mTmom,Nm33 �G' aC�6Coyroro3r ' V o - _8n8 a § ,.gmt-N Fu6bmfV',ArosQF£O2d0%zO w�5_"1 2n2W4mQ ^., b ^N P mw0N5yg ' Wiil a n n m ' O.mnW$m$ E;f 6 n mhggaE-dP3 mG a �uCMm: 2.; nz 2 wamiS� 1. G . !!!!!n file raEd 11:'-- ,,O, a _ cF.aitx 22.E A s 'T .AAs �a8d� � m 3 C � 1 141 ZERw 0 � 3 ay qqrr ° W F gorlg m 5Z as d 0 m ij .,s LARI 3 z n g 3 7 17, 3 F R J ne 44“41 .'psi”' =e "' z °"e V.Wgg ^"4-i Z-tM s g= &','-'4-..r.4 Y Y ; 5,,M q 5 449 - , A11 y ; ssai m wan 3arle MVO 1aaJ alen6s (gL 6f Bal.I.1.7 c % :roe °=wW. ,gym. TXP. -� c� a� �"° ...v 82a-�' -.0:4 e=a 2 m7rozm n� 4avw m ^ m m ] #onw wY ���n m8a -n•��n 2 d�"'n'rr sro�iy �a4 lg oI15,ga8acc.' .z •, 9] n 6 L m n n ;1,7, N i^ . m� mTmom,Nm33 �G' aC�6Coyroro3r ' V o - _8n8 a § ,.gmt-N Fu6bmfV',ArosQF£O2d0%zO w�5_"1 2n2W4mQ ^., b ^N P mw0N5yg ' Wiil a n n m ' O.mnW$m$ E;f 6 n mhggaE-dP3 mG a �uCMm: 2.; nz 2 wamiS� 1. G . !!!!!n file raEd 11:'-- ,,O, a _ cF.aitx 22.E A s 'T .AAs �a8d� � m 3 C � 1 141 ZERw 0 � 3 ay qqrr ° W F gorlg m 5Z as d 0 m ij .,s LARI 3 z n g 3 7 17, 3 F R J ne r:,',1 Y Y ^ ; ; l; 449 - , A11 y ; ssai m wan 3arle MVO 1aaJ alen6s (gL 6f Bal.I.1.7 c % :roe °=wW. ,gym. TXP. -� c� a� �"° ...v 82a-�' -.0:4 e=a 2 m7rozm n� 4avw m ^ m m ] #onw wY ���n m8a -n•��n 2 d�"'n'rr sro�iy �a4 lg oI15,ga8acc.' .z •, 9] n 6 L m n n ;1,7, N i^ . m� mTmom,Nm33 �G' aC�6Coyroro3r ' V o - _8n8 a § ,.gmt-N Fu6bmfV',ArosQF£O2d0%zO w�5_"1 2n2W4mQ ^., b ^N P mw0N5yg ' Wiil a n n m ' O.mnW$m$ E;f 6 n mhggaE-dP3 mG a �uCMm: 2.; nz 2 wamiS� 1. G . !!!!!n file raEd 11:'-- ,,O, a _ cF.aitx 22.E A s 'T .AAs �a8d� � m 3 C � 1 141 ZERw 0 � 3 ay qqrr ° W F gorlg m 5Z as d 0 m ij .,s LARI 3 z n g 3 7 17, 3 F R J CRYSTAL RANCH CORPORATION GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO TEMPORARY CONDITION OF BATCH PLANT/LEASE AREA i i i 8 i 1p i F r R i i CRYSTAL RANCH CORPORATION GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO ITL a„= DESIGNED 6Y BATCH PLANT AREA RECLAMATION PLAN DRAWN 8" CHECKE68Y EXHIBIT C S 0PRIS ENGINEERING, LLC. CONSULTAN?S 362 MAIC STREE- CARa0NOALE, 060152.7 (9101 704-0311 FAQ (970)700-03'? Exhibit D Final Condition of Batch Plant/Lease Area The final condition of the reclaimed Further Revised Leased Premises shall be as depicted on the Batch Plant Area Reclamation Plan attached hereto as Exhibit C, and as further described below: 1. All existing buildings are to be demolished and removed from the site. 2. All existing utilities which provide service to the Further Revised Leased Premises are to be disconnected and abandoned. Lessee is responsible for coordinating with the appropriate utility companies and. Sopris Engineering, or Lessor's representative, to ensure that utilities are adequately abandoned and/or removed from the site. 3. The berm and concrete wall which were installed inside of the lease area for screening of the batch plant operations are to be removed and the pit floor within the lease area is to be regraded to ensure positive drainage to the existing pond on the pit floor. 4. When the beim is removed, the pit floor within the lease area is to be reclaimed and covered with a minimum of 6" of subsoil overburden material (this material is to come from the screening berm) and then with a minimum of 6" of topsoil, seeded and mulched in accordance with the Seed Mix set forth in the Legend on the Batch Plant Area Reclamation Plan attached hereto as Exhibit C. In lieu of placing 6" of topsoil over the subsoil, Lessee may place an additional 6" of overburden material and amend the soil as needed in order to establish growth. If Lessee amends the overburden material, Lessee shall provide Sopris Engineering, or Lessor's Representative, with proposed amendments prior to performing the work. The Lessor will allow or supply irrigation water for the Lessee to connect to at Lessee's discretion for temporary irrigation if it is desirable. Alternatively, Lessor shall have the right to notify Lessee in writing at least ninety (90) days prior to the expiration date of the Extended Batch Plant Term of the Lease that Lessor does not wish the pit floor (or a defined portion thereof) to be reclaimed by removal of the concrete wall, berm, topsoil, and/or seeding, which notice shall describe the lesser level of reclamation desired by Lessor. ]8541303 EXHIBIT D TO FIFTH AMENDMENT Contractors Storage Yard Application 12015 Storm Water Management Plan (attached) 281 Page j.AFARG E NORTH AMERICA ioli°11 Environmental Stormwater Management Plan Powers Pit Garfield County, Colorado PERMIT NO. COG -501127 Revised: January 2015 Contents PLAN CERTIFICATION 3 SECTION I 4 DESCRIPTION OF INDUSTRIAL ACTIVITIES SECTION 2 6 SITE MAP 6 SECTION 3 7 c7TORM[VATER MANAGEMENT CONTROLS 7 SWMP Administration Team 7 Sampling Information . 10 History of `Significant Spills or Leaks of Toxic or Hazardous Materials 11 Preventative Maintenance 12 Good Housekeeping 13 Materials Handling, Spill Prevention and Response Procedures 14 Employee Training 15 Identification of Discharge other than Stormwater 16 SECTION 4 17 COMPREHENSIVE INSPECTIONS 17 REFERENCE DOCUMENTS 18 APPENDIX A APPENDIX B APPENDIX C APPENDIX D Plan. Certification Facility Name: Powers Pit Facility Type: Construction Sand and Gravel (SIC Code 1442) NPDES General Permit Number: COG -501127 Date that initial operation began: Lafarge Operations began in 2001 Facility Address: 14156 Highway 82 Carbondale, CO 81623 Site Contact: Sean Frisch, Land Manager, 720-320-2451 Christine Felz. Environmental Manager, 303-809-7231 Operation Schedule: Facility not operating, reclamation ongoing Number of Employees: 0 1 certify under penalty of law thatthis document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. 1 am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for known violations. This Storm Water Management Plan will he implemented as herein described. Brett Baker Name VP, Aggregates Signature 2-,s Date SECTION I Description of Industrial Activities This SWMP has been prepared for the Powers Pit facility in Garfield County. FIGURE 1 identifies the general location of the facility, as well as the nearest receiving waters. Industrial activities present at the site are as follows: D STOCKPILING (Check if applicable) CEI OVERBURDEN AND TOP SOIL Stockpiles may occur in the form of earthen berms. ❑ SAND AND GRAVEL Raw and processed aggregates are stockpiled for future use. El AGGREGATE MIX FOR CONCRETE PRODUCTION Aggregate can be stored in stockpiles, and loaded into a ground hopper as needed, and then conveyed to the plant. Material inay also be loaded directly into a series of hoppers located above the plant that directly discharge into the plant. El AGGREGATE MIX FOR ASPHALT PRODUCTION Raw material can be stockpiles or put into storage bins. L� ASPHALT MILLING The existing roadway is milled, emptied into haul trucks and hauled off-site. ❑ ASPHALT PAVING Hot mix asphalt is transported to the project from a production plant located off-site. It is then placed, compacted and rolled according to project specifications. O ASPHALT MANUFACTURING A hot -mix asphalt plant blends together aggregate and asphalt cement to produce a hot, homogeneous asphalt paving mixture, which is then hauled to off-site construction projects. The aggregate used can be a single material, such as a crusher run aggregate or a pit run material, or it can be a combination of coarse and fine aggregates, with or without mineral filler. The binder material used is normally asphalt cement but can also be an asphalt emulsion or one of a variety of modified materials. Various additives, including liquid and powdered materials, can also be incorporated into the mixture. Activities at these sites may include the following: raw material unloading into stockpiles or storage tanks, raw material feed to plant, material batching, raw material storage area, recyclable asphalt disposal area, truck wash out, and water supply and settling lakes. D READY MIXED CONCRETE, CENTRAL BATCHING These operations mix sand, gravel, cement, and water together to form ready mix concrete, which is then hauled to off-site construction projects. The raw materials are made up of sand, gravel, cement, water and additives. The sand and gravel is either stored in stockpiles located outside and fed into the plant via loaders and conveyors, or it is stored directly in a series of hoppers located directly above the central plant. The remainder of the raw materials is stored in tanks to protect them from exposure to moisture and temperature until they are pumped into the mixer. Once the raw materials are fed into the central mixer and combined to form Ready Mix concrete, the final product is placed within trucks and removed from the site. ❑ READY MIXED CONCRETE, DRY BATCHING These operations apportion out a mix of sand, gravel, cement, and water together, which is then mixed within the truck to form Ready Mixed concrete that is hauled to off-site construction projects. The raw materials are made up of sand, gravel, cement, water and additives. The sand and gravel is either stored in stockpiles located outside and fed into the plant via loaders and conveyors, or it is stored directly in a series of hoppers located directly above the central plant. The remainder of the raw materials is stored in tanks to protect them from exposure to moisture and temperature until they are pumped into the mixer. Dry hatching then apportions out and dumps the raw materials into the concrete truck -mounted ,mixer where it is continually agitated and mixed to keep it from hardening before it arrives on the assigned job site. [] EQUIPMENT FUELING Diesel and/or gasoline tanks are located on site for fueling of equipment. Off-site vendors roll tanks as needed. ❑ EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE The site contains a shop area where necessary maintenance can be conducted for site equipment. Typical chemicals associated with maintenance, such as used oil, antifreeze, motor oil, hydraulic oil, brake fluid, etc, may be stored on site as needed. All chemicals are stored in such a manner as to prevent materials from mixing with storrnwater or being accidentally discharged off site or to waters of the U.S. ❑ EQUIPMENT WASHING The site contains washout pits where concrete mixer trucks are washed out atter deliveries are made. Washout pits are located at least 50 feet away from storm drains, open ditches, or other water bodies. There is no runoff from this area, if possible a below grade washout pit is used, Washout pit never exceeds 75% full. 0 WASTE TREATMENT Waste generated on site is recycled, taken to landfills, exchanged or returned. SECTION 2 Site Map The site specific map may be found in Appendix B, which indicates site-specific characteristics and BMPs implemented at the Powers Pit. The site comprises 66.2 acres. The site has been determined to be within a single drainage area. The entire site is graded to retain all water. The nearest receiving water that may receive storm water flows from the facility is the Crystal Creek located to the west and the Roaring Fork River which is located to the south of the facility (FIGURE 1). The following is a list of specific information, if applicable, included on the Site Map: • Site boundary ✓ Access & haul roads ✓ Stormwater outfalls and an outline of each drainage area for each outfall • An estimate of the direction of flow 1 Material handling areas ✓ Each structural control measure to help reduce pollutants in storrnwater runoff ✓ Areas used for storage or disposal of overburden, materials, soils, or wastes 1 Areas used for mineral milling & processing ✓ Springs, streams, wetlands and other surface waters 1 Location of mine drainage or any other process water discharge points ✓ Boundary of tributary area that is subject to effluent limitations 1 Date the map was prepared and subsequent revision dates ✓ Locations of potential pollutant sources ✓ Locations of sampling points SECTION 3 Stormwater Management Controls This section describes the development and implementation of starmwater management controls specifically designed for Powers Pit including: SWMP Administration, identification of potential pollutant sources and Best Management Practices (BMPs), sampling information, preventative maintenance, good housekeeping techniques, Spill Prevention and Response Procedures, employee training, and identification of discharges other than stormwater. SWMP Administration Team Team Members Responsibilities Name: Sean Frisch Title: Land Manager Phone: 720-320-2451 - Assist in plan development - Advise Environmental Group of site changes Name: Brett Baker Title: VP/GM Phone: 816-332-0770 - Review & Certify Plan Name: Christine Felz Title: Environmental Manager Phone: 303-809-7231 - Complete plan and maps - Update plans as informed of changes -Facility inspections - Employee Training NOTE: Any team member may designate other trained personnel to conduct a facility inspection. Identification of Potential Pollutant Sources and Best Management Practices SEE APPENDIX D Sampling Information Schedules for Monitoring Sampling Location Pollutant Parameters to be Sampled Monitoring Schedules Numeric Limitations Discharge Point 001A, 002A Flow Continuous N/A Discharge Points 001, 002A pH 2/Month 6.5-9.0 !Discharge Points 001A, 002A Oil and Grease 2/Month 10 mgll Discharge Points 001A, 002A TSS 2/Month 7 -day - 45 mg/1 30 -day - 30 mgll Discharge Points 001A, 002A TDS Quarterly N/A Procedures for Monitoring This site does not discharge stormwater or process water. However, should discharge occur, Lafarge personnel will collect samples according following the methodologies provided in the current edition of 40 CFR 136. Typically, Lafarge sends samples to Pace Analytical for analysis. History of Significant Spills or Leaks of Toxic or Hazardous Materials Date Description of Spill or Leak --- Location, Material, Quantity, Remediation Actions No reportable spills or Leaks in the fast 3 years Preventative Maintenance This facility is in the process of reclamation and as such, there is no maintenance needed. The facility has been re -graded and seeded. As required by the permit, a stormwater inspection will be conducted annually. Good Housekeeping NIA — section does not apply; site is in reclamation process Materials Handling, Spill Prevention and Response Procedures This facility does not store petroleum products. However, should it be needed, training and procedures established under SPCC rules will be applied to al! petroleum storage within the facility. Secondary containment will be provided for the fuels and lubricating oil tanks should releases occur. Removal of accumulated liquids from the containrnents is accomplished by use of absorbents, portable pump, or other technique, and waste material is properly disposed of. In the event that a spill occurs: o Do— ■ Shut off supply, stop leak (if possible) • Shut of ignition sources ■ Contain spill and/or dike ahead of spill • Notify Plant Manager. if the spill leaves the site or is greater than 25 gallons, the Plant Manager will notify Environmental Group. • Protect adjacent people, property, surface waters, and equipment from contact with spill • Look to Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) for clean up guidance • Follow site SPCC plan • Place absorbents, dirt, or other solid materials in a non -leaking container and dispose of according to state and federal regulations a Don't— • Smoke ■ Risk personal injury • Wash down spill with water ■ Cover and not cleanup spill Employee. Training Training of personnel is conducted annually to educate employees, at all levels of responsibility, about t:he components and objectives of the storm water management plan for the site. The training scope will include the following topics: Spill Prevention Spill Response Good Housekeeping Techniques Materials Management Sediment & Erosion Prevention Definition of Process Water Best Management Practices in Place and Proper Maintenance Records of personnel training conducted, including personnel in attendance, date of training, and scope of training are available through the facility manager. Contractors and temporary personnel are inforrned of site specific design features and operations on their first visit to the site. Identification of Discharge other than Stormwater The site currently has no process water discharge. The ready mix plant on site is owned and operated by Old Castle Materials and they are responsible for water associated with the production of ready mix concrete. Should subsequent water uses be initiated on site, these water sources will be identified in the table below: Types of Discharge No Discharge Permitted Process Water Un permitted Exempt Control Measures Transport Discharge X Equipment Wash Water X Dust Control (roads) X Irrigation return flows X Other Agricultural discharge X Fire Fighting discharges X Foundation Draining(SUMP) X Springs X Pit. Dewatering X Other SECTION 4 Comprehensive Inspections A comprehensive inspection will be performed by a qualified individual once per year according to the permit. All records and reports are to be maintained with the plan at the managing office. Any potential sources of pollution identified in the SWMP in accordance with the permit shall be inspected for evidence of, or the potential for, pollutants entering the drainage system. Structural stormwater management measures, sediment and control measures, and other structural pollution prevention measures identified in the plan shall be observed to ensure that they are operating correctly. A visual inspection of equipment needed to implement the plan, such as spill response equipment, shall be made. Based on the results of the inspection, the description of potential pollutant sources and pollution prevention measures identified in the plan shall be revised as appropriate. Such revisions shall provide for implementation of any changes to the plan in a timely manner, but in no case more than 90 days after the inspection. REFERENCE DOCUMENTS The following is a list of documents that are kept at the nearest office and may be viewed upon request: • CIPS General Permit for COG -500000 • Stormwater Inspection Reports • Annual Reports • Stormwater Training Sign -in Records APPENDIX A Figure 1 General Location Map APPENDIX B Figure 2 Site Specific Map ira 2 v c) 2-7 cf) N c cn 0 CD N CO CD N • Q � N 0 N APPENDIX C Stormwater Inspection Form APPENDIX D BMP Identification Potential impact on Receiving Likelihood of Industrial Activity Best Management Practices Additional/Added BMPs (Materials Inventory} Water Contributing Pollutants (Date Implemented) (Date Implemented) (Potential Pollutants Present) to Stormwater On Site z Vegetation NIA _ _ Site Grading z Stockpiles of overburden, raw material, intermediate products, byproducts, finished products N/A N±'A N/A (Sand and Gravel Storage Piles) Areas used for recycling of asphalt or concrete N/A N/A N/A (Recyclable Concrete Piles) Areas used for recycling of asphalt or concrete N/A N/A NIA (Recyclable Asphalt Piles) Outdoor Storage Activities NIA N/A N/A (Lime Storage Silo) Outdoor Storage Activities (Boneyard) N/A NiA NIA Outdoor Storage Activities NIA N/A N/A (Unleaded Fuel Tank) Outdoor Storage Activities NIA N/A NIA (Used Oil) Continued on next page a z z z No disturbed areas, entire site is seeded Haul Roads Disturbed Areas (Erosion Control) Loading/Unloading Operations (Aggregate Unloading) r) w ac C7 L al Pollutant Sources/ Best Management Practices Identification of Paten STATE OF COLORADO County of Garfield • '141I4 At a...,..,,...,r�, alar held at�i'.....'. ............ the Court1 8 d house in Glenwood r 'Theo ti: ' ..p•;ngs o2„:,1_ .... Q R Cl �+ of the .Board olarz ® County Commissioners for psi .................. ......�........,. d County C ............... 19 ............ the...,...,........., • •� there were Ire ..... ....aay ......... . Pleven J Cerise commissioner Chairman .....,............................................................... r Commissioner .-.........Arthur..Commissioner : 7Planc 1pr....: r:........ ........................ r3n G rl Cry County Alta; hey when the followingy..,.,,.P................p.,E �} Ll proceedings, �e, .o-.... ^ _rk of the Board 4 among others were had and dans, to -wit: �1� RESOLUTION NO. 80-58 A RESOLUTION CONCERNED -WITH THE APPROVAL OF SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION BY JOHN G. POWERS. WHEREAS. the Board County has received Baa of County Commissioners of Garfield as agent for John G. Powers, cfor oa from aFla use Concrete, rInc- action of natural resources spediah permit for onplnatural resources by the establishment dofha plant and a coItcrete batch processing or: nt ndla con plant as r gravel washing g described tract of incipal use of a lot land: That part of Lot Township 12 in the SW -1/4 of Section 6th5Toins p 7 South, Range 88 West of the Colorado State Meridian, lying northerly of Highway 82; and WHEREAS, pursuant coconducted a Aublic hearing to required. public notice, the Board on question �, on the 17th day of March upon snit thehoues be of whether the above .,s r 1980, granted or d- c='.'�ead special use public and agencies at which hearing the public interested, gencies and persons were of said special express them- Opinions regarding giventheu use permit: and-� �_:?g the issuance d WHEREAS, the Boaron the basis of at the aforementioned hearin, the evidence tions of fact: g, has made produced the following deterrnina- ?- The proposed use and permitted in the districtincompatible isttolocated, provided the uses existing that certain hereinafter contained conditions b complied with. ons be 2. That neither or on utilities, , neither the impart on traffic beor injurious to theor y other impact ofvolume and will �uriousestablished neighborhood the special Ilse in which the special ghto be located. zv�W. THEREFORE, of Garfield HER• BE IT RESOLVED by the Ccarmissioners and herebyrfiCounty, Colorado, that a special use permit he authorized cribed tract of1 -'-- permitting t ?e Z.�A rlr' • 2. The special use permit herein authorized shall extend only to that part of Lot 12, in the SW1/4 of Section 26, Township 7 South, Range 88 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, lying northerly of Colorado State High- way 82 and easterly of the east line of Lot 13 in said sec- tion and a northward extension thereof into the aforementioned Lot 12. 3. That no water affected or used by the extractive or processing operations on the subject property will be per- mitted by the owners or operators to flow from the subject property in a condition affected by such operation. ATTEST: 1 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO eputy k of t e Board Chairman �I1i MAMMY [VII PiLle IO II r UUI 041101 Recept ionic: 811974 12/14/2011 D9:17:38 AM lean Alberieo 1 of 7 Rea Fee:SO.00 Doc Fec0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO STATE OF COLORADO ) )ss County of Garfield ) At a regular meeting of the Board of County Commissioners for Garfield County, Colorado, held in the Commissioners' Meeting Room, Garfield County Courthouse, in Glenwood Springs on Monday, the 5th day of December, 2011, there were present: John Martin , Commissioner Chairman Mike Samson , Commissioner Tom Jankovsky , Commissioner Andrew Gam , County Attorney Carey Gagnon Assistant County Attorney Jean Alberico , Clerk of the Board of County Commissioners Ed Green (absent) , County Manager when the following proceedings, among others were had and done, to -wit: RESOLUTION NO. 2011- 7/ A RESOLUTION CONCERNED WITH THE APPROVAL OF A LAND USE CHANGE PERMIT, MIPA 6919, FOR THE CONTINUED OPERATION OF A CONCRETE BATCH PLANT KNOWN AS THE "POWER'S PIT CONCRETE BATCH PLANT" PARCEL NO. 2393-234-00-131 Recitals A. The Board of County Commissioners of Garfield County, Colorado, received an application from Crystal Ranch Corp, (the "Applicant') for a Land Use Change Permit for a substantial modification to an existing Special Use Permit operating pursuant to Resolution 1980-58. B. The subject property, depicted and described in Exhibit A, is located at the northwest corner of State Highway 82 and Crystal Spring Creek Road (County Road 103) and is approximately two miles northeast of Carbondale, Colorado with a property address of 013114 State Highway 82. C. The subject property is described in the application documents and located within the parcel described in the attached Exhibit A and incorporated by this reference. D. The subject property is located within the Rural zone district and a Land Use Change Permit for a substantial modification to an existing Special Use Permit requires approval through a Major Impact Review Process conducted by Garfield County. 1111F iININIiillitIMiIIC{lill4cni UN't1•1111 Reo ptlan#; 811974 121t4f2011 :17:36 ASI .dean Albertan 2 of 7 Ree ee:$0 00 Dao Fee:0.011 GARFIELD COUNTY CO E. The Board of County Commissioners is authorized to approve, approve with conditions, ordeny a Land Use Change Permit for "a substantial change to a Special Use Permit" pursuant to Sections 1-301 and 4-106 of the Garfield County Unified Land Use Resolution of 2008, as amended. F. The Garfield County Planning Commission opened a public hearing on September 28, 2011 upon the question of whether the Land Use Change Permit application for a substantial change to an existing Special Use Permit should be approved, approved with conditions, or denied, during which hearing the public and interested persons were given the opportunity to express their opinions regarding the application. G. The Garfield County Planning Commission closed the public hearing on September 28, 2011 and forwarded a recommendation of approval with conditions to the Board of County Commissioners, H. The Board of County Commissioners opened a public hearing on the 5''' day of December, 2011 upon the question of whether the Land Use Change Permit application for the substantial modification to an existing Special Use Permit should be approved, approved with conditions, or denied, during which hearing the public and interested persons were given the opportunity to express their opinions regarding the application. I. The Board of County Commissioners closed the public hearing on December 5, 2011 to make a final decision. J. The Board of County Commissioners on the basis of substantial competentevidence produced at the aforementioned hearings has made the following determinations of fact. 1. That the proper notice was provided as required for the hearings before the Board of County Commissioners; and 2. That the hearings before the Board of County Commissioners was extensive and complete, that all pertinent facts, matters and issues were submitted or could be submitted and that all interested parties were heard at those meetings; and 3. That the application, if all conditions are met, will be in conformance with the applicable Sections of the Garfield County Unified Land Use Resolution of 2008, as amended; and 4. That the modification of the landscaping standards are an appropriate deviation as per Section 7-305A,7.a of the Unified Land Use Resolution of 2008, as amended, and that the modification to include the planting of 1 'V2 inch caliper trees is appropriate; and 1111wifronl r IL 1l M,1R{i MIT I Reception#• 811974 12114/2011 09:17:36 AM Jean Alber1oo 3 of 7 Roo Fes:80.90 Doo Fsa:O,OO GARFIELD COUNTY CO 5. The proposed use is the best interest of the health, safety, convenience, order, prosperity and welfare of the citizens of Garfield County so long the conditions of approval are met. RESOLUTION NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Garfield County, Colorado, that: 1. That the proper notice was provided as required for the hearings before the Board of County Commissioners; and 2. That the hearing before the Board of County Commissioners was extensive and complete, that all pertinent facts, matters and issues were submitted or could be submitted and that all interested parties were heard. 3. That the application, if all conditions are met, will be in conformance with the applicable Sections of the Garfield County Unified Land Use Resolution of 2008, as amended. 4. That the modification of the landscaping standards are an appropriate deviation as per Section 7-305A.7.a of the Unified Land Use Resolution of 2008, as amended, and that the modification to include the planting of 1 % inch caliper trees is appropriate. 5. That the proposed use is the best interest of the health, safety, convenience, order, prosperity and welfare of the citizens of Garfield County so long as the following conditions are met: a. That all representations made by the Applicant in the application, and at the public hearings before the Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners, shall be conditions of approval, unless specifically altered by the Board of County Commissioners; b. That the operation of the facility be done in accordance with all applicable Federal, State and Local regulations governing the operation of this type of facility; c. All new lighting associated with the property shall be directed inward and downward towards the interior of the property; d. Prior to the issuance of a Land Use Change Permit, the applicant shall resolve with County Road and Bridge and Colorado Department of Transportation outstanding issues with road improvements and access which include but are not limited to: i. Appropriate Signage. The applicant shall work with County Road and Bridge to determine the appropriate type and placement of signage including but not limited to stop signs, truck warning signs and speed Ell PA WAIN 11ItI Reception#' 811974 1211412211 09:17:36 P1 Jean A1Oeriao 4 of 7 Ree Fea:S2.00 Doc Fee:e.06 G Rr1ELD CCU4TY CO signs. ii. Relocation of Private Driveway. The Applicant shall work with County Road and Bridge to determine the appropriate location for the proposed private driveway access taking into account stacking distance and site distance. The applicant will provide a copy of an approved Driveway Access Permit to the Planning Department. County Road 103 and State Highway 82 Improvements. The Applicant shall work with Colorado Department of Transportation and. County Road and Bridge to determine the necessity of any additional road improvements, including but not limited to tam lanes, deceleration/acceleration lanes, and drainage improvements. A copy of an approved Colorado Department of Transportation access permit shall be provided to the Planning Department. iv. Improvements Agreement. The Applicant shall design, engineer, construct and provide adequate financial security for any work to be completed on County Road 103, in a form as required by the County and pursuant to the Garfield County Road and Right-of-way Regulations. c. The applicant shall deed to the County all portions of County Road 103 that fall upon or cross the Crystal Ranch Corp. property. f. All vehicles using County Road 103 to access the Crystal Ranch Corp Concrete Batch Plant shall abide by Garfield County's oversize/overweight system. All vehicles requiring oversize/overweight permits shall be obtained from the Garfield County Road and Bridge Department. g. All trucks using the site access and/or County Road 103 shall not use engine Jake Brakes to decelerate. h. The concrete batch plant shall be allowed to operate Monday through Saturday from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. while on-site administrative and/or maintenance activities may operate Monday through Saturday 6:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. There shall be rio operations on Sunday except in the case of an emergency or for standard maintenance purposes. i. All noise generated from the operation shall not exceed the maximum permissible limits set forth in C.R.S. § 25-12-103. j. The property owner and operator acknowledge that Garfield County has the following performance standards, and failure to comply with such standards could lead to revocation of the Land Use Change Permit i. All fabrication, service and repair operations shall be conducted within an enclosed building or obscured by a fence, natural topography or landscaping; X111 rilirriNan 1W . �,1 ;h 1111s Mill 11111 Reeeption#: 811974 12/14/2011 09:17;36 Aft lean Riperica 3 of 7 Rea Fee:$0.00 Doc Fee:0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO ii. All operations involving loading and unloading of vehicles shall be conducted on private property and shall not be conducted on a public right-of-way; iii. All industrial wastes shall be disposed of in a manner consistent with statutes and requirements of Colorado Department of Public Health and Environ.nient; iv. Every use shall be operated so that the ground vibration inherently and recurrently generated is not perceptible without instruments at any point of any boundary line of the property; and v. Every use shall be operated so that it does not emit, heat, glare, radiation, dust, or fumes which substantially interfere with the existing use of adjoining property or which constitutes a public nuisance or hazard. Flaring of gases, aircraft warning signal and reflective painting of storage tanks, or other legal requirements for safety or air pollution control measures shall be exempted from this provision. k. The applicant shall implement the revised landscaping plan in areas outside of those directly impacted by the continued operation of the concrete batch plant by April 30, 2013. The fall extent of the landscaping plan shall be implemented upon the termination of the batch plant lease in 2028. 1. Prior to the issuance of a Land Use Change Permit an Emergency Preparedness Plan shall be submitted to the Planning DepaU.€went and the Carbondale Rural Fire Protection District. rn. Gravel for this concrete batch plant shall be hauled from Cerise Mine except for limited quantities of specialty products not available at this location which may be brought in from other sources. Contrary to any provision in the County's Unified Land Use Resolution in effect at the time of the request, the Director of Building and Planning or the Board of County Commissioners may consider any change to this condition of approval as either a `non -substantial change" or a "substantial change" depending upon the evidence of any changes to off-site impacts of the approved Land Use Change Permit, and the requested change will be reviewed accordingly. n. All conditions of approval will remain in full force as required in Resolution 1980-58 John G. Powers SUP) in addition to the conditions herein. 1111111%17111,+�A41i,1411,1 $1,1411411flk 141.1 1. llii 11111 Recept i ortt# : 811974 12114/2011 C9:17:36 RM Jean Alberica 6 of 7 Red Fse40.00 Doc Fee:0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO Dated this 126 day of December , 2011 ATTEST: GARFIELD COUNTY GARFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, COLORADO Cler /of the Board of County C Upon motion. duly made and seconded following vote: COMMISSIONER CHAIR JOHN F. MARTIN COMMISSIONER MIKE SAMSON COMMISSIONER TOM JANKOVSKY STATE OF COLORADO )ss County of Garfield , Aye Aye , Aye I, , County Clerk and ex -officio Clerk of the Board of County Commissioners, m and for the County and State aforesaid, do hereby certify that the annexed and foregoing Resolution is truly copied from the Records of the Proceeding of the Board of County Commissioners for said Garfield County, now in my office. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, T have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of .said County, at Glenwood Springs, this 12th day of December , 2011. County Clerk and ex -officio Clerk of the Board of County Commissioners VIII igh !ZOOM iONWNEI1OI II III Reeep€Len#: 911974 im=p. 12/14/2011 09:17:86 RM ,Ivan Rlberlec 7 of 7 Roc Foo:$0,00 Doo F44:0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO ~7s :1::11111.111igf '�� r�r ij:i;'aii;a 3 , ia10 ;4:1;iii: ''1 a3 a9tea ,,,111 �/ 1 i imvggP0,1 '411 1 ,baa t tle1q :a$ ¢. a �y1 ga 3 2s°21-1 iiiV . /40nye 1;a 4 o 8 .� e �iillii 1x ?2:115': i PI ��sy Xa i1� F�� �;' .�'Q stp B� $ a'�a 15 l�l� 1 �'a a°3saw 1 i 5 e5 1. 1g 11=04:1@ 3~`i: p;11111iiii11 x :Iii;? R 11a- 1" 1p .y. ,,!;;1112E1 itil d4 3 y I e!Ir 1$i sa i•. Xeign r 65 a 1:1 !!/12111111,11511011!:510034 *A1471gINT 1; g .!i i,ei"11i�iilsiiiifiMil!ii1;11:1:..;x '.x;ia�K sritl "3 1.. g` aN U ` 1IT 4 Board of County Commissioners December 5, 2011 MIPA-5919 PROJECT INFORMATION AND STAFF COMMENTS TYPE OF REVIEW APPLICANT (OWNER) Major Impact Review — Land Use Change Permit for a Substantial Change to a previously approved SUP for Gravel Pit and Batch Plant Operations Powers Crystal Ranch Corp. c/o Art Daily, Holland and Hart, LLP PLANNER/CONSULTANT Douglas Pratte, The Land Studio, Inc. LOCATION Northwest corner of Highway 82 and CR 103, Parcel # 239323400131 PHYSICAL ADDRESS 13112 Highway 82 ACRES 414.8 Acres ZONING Rural COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION Rural Employment Center (PC Resolution 2011-04) Approval with Conditions STAFF RECOMMENDATION I. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL In 1980, John G. Powers was issued a Special Use Permit for "extraction of natural resources and the processing of natural resources by the establishment of a gravel washing plant and a concrete batch plant" as memorialized in Resolution 1980- 58. The existing aggregate mining/extraction activity will continue on this site, along with the existing gravel washing/processing and the concrete batch plant operation until April 18, 2013, following which date only the concrete batch plant is planning to continue operation. The applicant is requesting a substantial. change to the previously approved SUP, in Figure 1: Vicinity Map 1IPag Board of County Commissioners December 5, 2011 MIPA-6919 that after April 18, 2013, the mined material for the batch plant will need to be trucked in from off-site due to the closure and reclamation of the on-site extraction operations. The applicant states that this CR 103 Existing Powers Pit Concrete Batch Cerise Mine and Proposed Access Revised Powers Pit Proposed Access Concrete Batch Plant Initially Proposed Access Figure 2: Vicinity map showing the approved Cerise Mine and proposed accesses material will be trucked in from the recently approved Cerise Mine (Resolution 2011-44), also on CR 103. The concrete batch plant will continue operations on approximately 5.771 acres (leased by LaFarge) of the overall acreage. Figure 3: Adjacent Land lases The subject parcel is located at the southwest corner of CR 103 and SH 82 and comprises 414.8 acres. However, only 68 acres of this property has been used for the extraction and batch plant operations and is currently under lease by Larfarge. Some reclamation is currently being performed on the site, while most of the reclamation will be performed prior to April of 2013, and the remaining reclamation (batch plant site) is scheduled to be performed when the batch plant lease term expires in 2028. Adjacent uses include residential, agricultural and aggregate extraction uses. Rural zoning, public lands (BLM) and Residential -Low exist adjacent or proximate to the site. Board of County Commissioners December 5, 2011 M 1 PAS -6'919 11. REFFERAL AGENCY COMMENTS Referral comments were received and contained the general information as relevant to this application as follows: Town of Parachute, dated August 22, 2011 (Exhibit H) — states that Parachute has no objection to this request. Town of Carbondale, dated September 12, 2011 (Exhibit I) --letter does not provide any direct comments in regards to this proposal. Garfield County Road and Bridge, email dated September 12, 2011 (Exhibit 1) - expresses several concerns with the proposed access including limited sight distance and inadequate staking distance. They are also concerned with safety impeding traffic) and noise. Figure 4: Internal concrete batch plant operations Garfield County Designated Engineer (Mountain Cross Engineering, Inc), dated September 13, 2011 (Exhibit K) — summarizes several issues with the increase of traffic on SH 82 and the need for improvements to be completed. It also includes the need for clarification of the submitted noise study and proper permitting for CDPHE, CDOT and the County. Garfield County Road and Bridge, email dated September 14, 2011 (Exhibit 11 — states that the applicant will also need a county driveway access permit to be submitted and approved pending adequate design of the proposed access along CR 103. Colorado Department of Transportation, email dated September 14, 2011 (Exhibit M) — states the project will need to have an access permit for CR 103 onto SH 82 and includes several design issues including lack of sufficient right-of-way to accommodate additional lanes, removal of the proposed emergency access location, siting of the intersection of CR 103 and new private driveway, and consideration of a future traffic signal at CR 103 and SH 82. Garfield County Road and Bridge, email dated September 16, 2011 (Exhibit N) — states the applicant is attempting to work with road and bridge in a timely fashion but county staff cannot currently accommodate a meeting until mid-October. Board of County Commissioners December 5, 2011 MIPA-6919 Roaring Fork Transportation Authority, email dated September 19, 2011 (Exhibit D) — letter does not provide any direct comments in regards to this proposal. Carbondale Rural Fire Protection District, letter dated November 28, 2011 (Exhibit V) — Letter supports the design of a "boulevard" entry/exit along CR 103 to provide adequate emergency access. Additional referral comment requests were sent to the following agencies, of which no response has been received: Garfield County Environmental Health RE -1 School District CO Water Resources/Engineer's office CO Mined Land Reclamation Board CO Department of Public Health CO Division of Wildlife Bureau of Land Management US Forest Service III. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS A. SECTION 4-502.D LAND SUITABLITY ANALYSIS. The Land Suitability Analysis shall include the following information, unless specifically waived by the Director. 1. Public Access to Site. Show historic public access to or through the site. Staff Comment: There is currently no public access through this site. Private access is currently located through an emergency access (ranch) and private driveway along SH 82, however both of these will be replaced by a new access point along CR 103, per this application. 2. Access to adjoining Roadways. Identify access to adjoining roads and site distance and intersection constraints. Staff Comment: Existing access to the site is located at approximately 700 feet north of the intersection of SH 82 and CR 103. The second existing access is approximately 1200 feet north along SH 82 from this intersection. The applicant originally proposed the second access (also served as Ranch access) to be retained as an emergency access to serve the subject property, however, in a November 2, 2011 Meeting CDOT indicated the use of this access location would not be permitted. The applicant has since modified their proposal to accommodate CDOT's concerns and have revised their concept plans to provide for a "boulevard" entry/exit that will sufficiently handle emergency access. This "boulevard" entry/exit will be constructed at a new driveway opening along CR 103 (revised location from PC review), as conceptually approved by County Road and Bridge, and will be located approximately 400 feet from the intersection of 5H 82. 4 Board of County Commissioners December 5, 2011 MIPA-6919 3. Easements. Show all easements defining, limiting or allowing use types and access. Staff comment: There exists a 16 foot wide telephone easement on the property. In addition CR 103 crosses the southwest portion of the property. In the subsequent revisions to the plan after PC review, the applicant has included in their letter dated, November 21, 2011 that will deed the Right —of -way 4. Topography and Slope. Topography and slope determination. Staff Comment: The applicant submitted both the current conditions as well as the proposed conditions after reclamation, as approved in their site reclamation plan. The site currently has significant man-made topographic features including 10 foot berm along SH 82 and steeps side grades on the south, east and north that range from 60 to 100 feet. 5. Natural Features. Significant natural features on-site and off-site. Staff Comment: No significant natural features currently exist. 6. Drainage Features. Existing drainages and impoundments, natural and manmade. Staff Comment: the submitted drainage plan addresses the control of surface drainage on the site to contain the run-off insuring no negative impact to surrounding vegetation. 7. Water. Historic irrigation, tailwater issues, water demands, adequate water supply pursuant to Section 7-104 or 7-105 as applicable (Resolution 2010-29). Staff Comment: Historically, much of Power's Ranch was flood irrigated using water rights in the Kelly Ditch and Kelly Wastewater Ditch, which was diverted from Crystal Spring. Water has also been provided to the gravel pit from water diverted from the Roaring Fork River through the Kelso ditch to James Reservoir for industrial and irrigation uses. 8. Floodplain. Flood plain and flood fringe delineations. Staff Comment: The full extent of the site is outside of the 100 -year floodplain. 9. Soils. Soils determination, percolation constraints, as applicable. Staff Comment: Subsurface soil conditions generally consist of 0-9 feet of fill (aggregate base course, asphalt pavement, gravel or crusher fines) underlain by clean to slightly silty gravel with cobbles and boulders. 10. Hazards. Geologic hazards on-site, and adjacent to site. Staff Comment: No geological or geotechnical conditions were identified which would preclude the planned development of this site. Collapse -prone soils outside of the pit area and potential for sinkhole formation related to Eagle Valley Evaporite are the primary geologic concerns. 11. Natural Habitat. Existing flora and fauna habitat, wetlands, migration routes. Staff Comment: The continuation of the existing concrete batch plant operation will impose no new impacts on wildlife. There are no wetlands on the site. Enhancement to on-site vegetation to enhance the flora (landscaping) of the site are addressed in the reclamation plan. Board of County Commissioners December 5, 2011 M I PA -6919 12. Resource Areas. Protected or Registered Archaeological, cultural, paleontological and historic resource areas. Staff Comment: No protected or registered archaeological, cultural, paleontological or historic resource areas will be disturbed to continue the concrete batch plant operations. B. SECTION 4-502.E IMPACT ANALYSIS The Impact Analysis shall provide a description of the impacts that the proposed land use change may cause, based upon the standards that the proposed use must satisfy. The Impact Analysis shall include a complete description of how the applicant will ensure that impacts will be mitigated and standards will be satisfied. The following information shall be included in the Impact Analysis. 1. Adjacent Property. An address list of real property adjacent to the subject property, and the mailing address for each of the property owners. Staff Comment: the applicant provided an address list for property owners within 200 feet of the parcel for public notice. 2. Adjacent Land Use. Existing use of adjacent property and neighboring properties within a 1500 foot radius. Staff Comment: The site is located in an area of agriculture, gravel extraction, rural residential and public lands (BIM) uses. 3. Site Features. A description of site features such as streams, areas subject to flooding, lakes, high ground water areas, topography, vegetative cover, climatology, and other features that may aid in the evaluation of the proposed development. Staff Comment: The site is mostly denude of vegetation due to the long term extraction and processing that has taken place on the site. The site also has significant topographic features that will be recontoured with the completion of site reclamation. This will result in a large berrn along SH 82. 4. Soil Characteristics. A description of soil characteristics of the site which have a significant influence on the proposed use of the land. Staff Comment: The applicant includes that there is not any soils issue on this site due to the use currently existing on the site and that soils have proven to be generally favorable to the existing and proposed continued use. 5. Geology and Hazard. A description of the geologic characteristics of the area including any potential natural or man-made hazards, and a determination of what effect such factors would have on the proposed use of the land. Staff Comment: No geological or geotechnical conditions were identified which would preclude the planned development of this site. Collapse -prone soils outside of the pit area and potential for sinkhole formation related to Eagle Valley Evaporite are the primary geologic concerns. Board of County Commissioners December 5, 2011 M I PA -6919 6. Effect on Existing Water Supply and Adequacy of Supply. Evaluation of the effect of the proposed land use on the capacity of the source of water supply to meet existing and future domestic and agricultural requirements and meeting the adequate water supply requirements of Section 7-104. Staff Comment: Historically, much of the Powers Ranch was flood irrigated using water in the Kelly Ditch and the Kelly Wastewater Ditch, which water rights divert from Crystal Spring. Water has also been provided to the gravel pit from water diverted from the Roaring Fork. River through the Kelso Ditch to James Reservoir for industrial and irrigation uses. This water is pumped below highway 82 for these industrial and irrigation uses. The historically irrigated lands have now largely been mined and are ready for revegetation. The Kelso Ditch is also decreed to provide supplemental irrigation to the same gravel pit acreage that was historically irrigated under the Kelly Ditch. The Roaring Fork Sand and Gravel pit has been operating since the mid -1960's. The primary industrial water supply has been from James Reservoir that is providing water from the Kelso and Martin Ditches. These industrial uses from the Reservoir and ditches were confirmed and augmented pursuant to the decree entered on February 6, 1995 in Case No. 92CW304. That decree also confirmed that these rights could be used for irrigation uses upon the Powers Ranch. James Reservoir has a surface area of 1.38 acres and a capacity of 8.28 acre-feet. It is located in the southwest corner of Lot 11, Section 26, Township 7 South, Range 88 West, 6th P.M. The Martin and Kelso Ditches are decreed for 3 cfs for industrial and irrigation uses. Water will continue to be provided for the continuation of the concrete batch plant operations and irrigation for reclamation per the above-described physical and legal water supplies. 7. Effect on Groundwater and Aquifer Recharge Areas. Evaluation of the relationship of the subject parcel to floodplains, the nature of soils and subsoils and their ability to adequately support waste disposal, the slope of the land, the effect of sewage effluents, and the pollution of surface runoff, stream flow and groundwater. Staff Comment: The nearest floodplain to the Power's Pit is the Roaring Fork River floodplain which lies approximately % mile to the south. Proposed uses of the site do not include waste disposal. r ''� Y4, '.. --'--.—.--:..----..7:33.-"--- ..---...--- ----.... 11444:8.7t4 Figure 5: Revised Landscape Plan : as 71Page Board of County Commissioners December 5, 2011 MIPA-6919 8. Environmental Effects. Determination of the existing environmental conditions on the parcel to be developed and the effects of development an those conditions, including: a. Determination of the long term and short term effect on flora and fauna. Staff Comment: The applicant states there will be no impacts on wildlife or alteration of existing native vegetation or other disruptions due to the existing nature of the project use. The applicant will implement their proposed landscaping plan. b. Determination of the effect on significant archaeological, cultural, paleontological, historic resources. Staff Comment: The concrete batch plant has been the long-term use of the property and there are no significant archaeological, cultural, paleontological, historic resources affected by this operation. c. Determination of the effect on designated environmental resources, including critical wildlife habitat, (1) Impacts on wildlife and domestic animals through. creation of hazardous attractions, alteration of existing native vegetation, blockade of migration routes, use patterns or other disruptions. Staff Comment: Five DOW mapped habitat areas existing on the concrete batch plant site including black bear, mountain lion, elk overall range and bald eagle winter range and mule deer summer and critical winter range. Because the batch plant is devoid of native vegetation or potential habitat it is presumed that no impacts on wildlife will occur with this continuation of use. It is likely, however, that since this is critical winter range for mule deer this species may use this area once reclamation and revegetation has occurred on this site. d. Evaluation of any potential radiation hazard that may have been identified by the State or County Health Departments. Staff Comment: Through testing conducted in April 2011, the applicant found radiation on-site to be within a normal range for this area. e. Spill Prevention Control and Counter Measures plan, if applicable. Staff Comment: Lafarge,West, Inc has prepared a spill prevention, control and countermeasure (SPCC) plan fast amended in March 2011, on behalf of the applicant. 9. Traffic. Assessment of traffic impacts based upon a traffic study prepared in compliance with Section 4-502(J). Staff Comment: The traffic impact from the "Lafarge West Cerise Site" project was originally evaluated by Eugene G. Coppola in a report dated August 4, 2010 and is Board of County Commissioners December 5, 2011 M I PA -6919 included as an exhibit to the project submittal. At the PC hearing, an error in the traffic report was discovered and the applicant was conditioned to provide a revised and accurate traffic report as part of the recommendation for approval. The applicant has since revised the traffic report and it has been included in the revised submittal material. Based upon the original report, CDOT, County Road and Bridge and the designated County Engineer had submitted comments in regards to the adequacy and need for traffic improvements. Based upon the finding in the revised report, the Applicant met with Representatives of CDOT and the County to discuss solutions to the design issues that were highlighted in each agency's (including Mountain Cross Engineering) comments. Though an engineering design has not yet been created, the revised conceptual design for the traffic -related issues has been conceptually approved by both CDOT and County Road and Bridge. CDOT will require an access permit for the revision to this project's traffic flow. Presently, this permit has not been submitted to CDOT and it will be the responsibility of the applicant to pursue this permit. County Road and Bridge will also require a driveway permit and an agreement for improvements to be made to CR 103. The County will not issue a Land Use Change Permit until these permits have been obtained from both CDOT and County Road and Bridge and any/all conditions of these permits will be conditions of approval. Figure 6: Revised Private and Emergency Access 91Pag . Board of County Commissioners December 5, 2011 MI PA -5919 10. Nuisance. Impacts on adjacent land from generation of vapor, dust, smoke, noise, glare or vibration, or other emanations. Staff Comment: The current operation meets the standards for air, glare, radiation and fumes which may substantially interfere with the existing use of adjoining property or which may constitute a public nuisance or hazard. The lessee of the property (Lafarge) currently has a SPCC, Stormwater management plan, Wastewater Discharge permit, Construction permit (air quality) and noise analysis that limit and prevent nuisance impacts on the neighboring properties. Lafarge has been operating this concrete batch plant and extraction operation for more than 10 years without a record of violation. 11. Reclamation Plan. A reclamation plan consistent with the standards in Section 7-212. Staff Comment: The applicant has submitted an adequate reclamation plan for the existing gravel extraction operations and is the same plan that has been approved by the state for the reclamation of the entire site. C. SECTION 7-100 GENERAL APPROVAL STANDARDS FOR LAND USE CHANGE PERMITS SECTION 7-101 COMPLIANCE WITH ZONE DISTRICT USE RESTRICTIONS Staff Comment: The application seeking a Land Use Change permit through a Major Impact Review is in accordance with the Rural Zone district and use regulations of the adopted ULUR 2008, as amended. SECTION 7-102 COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND IGAs Staff Comment: Concurrently with this application, the applicant requested a Comprehensive Plan amendment to add a Rural Employment Center to the Future Land Use Map on this property. This Comprehensive Plan Amendment was approved per PC Resolution 2011-04, which makes this MIR application compliant with the Comprehensive Plan 2030, as amended; specifically those areas discussing, future land use designations, industrial uses, mineral extraction and economic diversity. The County currently has an IGA with the Town of Carbondale that includes this site. The IGA requires sending the application for referral comments. Carbondale has provided comments that are included in this report. Figure 7: Rural Zoning Designation 10I Board of County Commissioners December 5, 2011 M I PA -6919 Figure 8: Rural Employment Center designation at this location per Comprehensive Plan 2030, as amended confirmed and augmented from the James SECTION 7-103 COMPATIBILITY Staff Comment: The existing uses on the site include resource extraction operations, aggregate washing, aggregate sales, aggregate shipping and a concrete batch plant. The current lease for the aggregate extraction will expire in 2013 while the lease for the concrete batch plant will extend until 2028. Surrounding land use on the Crystal Ranch Corp. property is agricultural with a scattering of rural residential uses. SECTION 7-104 SUFFICIENT LEGAL AND PHYSICAL SOURCE OF WATER Staff Comments: As noted in Section 4- 502.E.6, the operation has an agricultural and industrial water use decrees that have been Reservoir and the Kelly, Kelso and Martin ditches. Water will be continued to be provided for the concrete batch plant operations and irrigation for reclamation per the described physical and legal water supplies. SECTION 7-105 ADEQUATE WATER SUPPLY Staff Comments: The batch plant operation does not currently have a potable water system and does not plan on installing a system as part of their continued operation. SECTION 7-106 ADEQUATE WATER DISTRIBUTION AND WASTEWATER SYSTEMS Staff Comments: The batch plan operation does not currently have a central water distribution or wastewater system and will not plan on installing either of these systems as part of their continued operation. SECTION 7-107 ADEQUATE PUBLIC UTILTIIES Staff Comments: The batch plant will continue its current size and scale of operation and therefore will not require any new or additional public utilities for this project. SECTION 7-108 ACCESS AND ROADWAYS Staff Comments: As noted in comments from the County's designated engineer, Chris Hale, County Road and Bridge and CDOT, this project will impact both CR 103 and SH 82 and will require proper permitting and adequate improvements. Permitting, an agreement and security for necessary improvements, and signage should be required as any consideration for approval of this project. See comments in Section 9 for additional discussion on access. Board of County Commissioners December 5, 2011 MIPA-6919 SECTION 7-109 NO SIGNIFICANT RISK FROM NATURAL HAZARDS Staff Comments: No geological or geotechnical conditions were identified that would preclude the continued operation of the batch plant on this site or future development of this site. D. SECTION 7-200 GENERAL REOURCE PROTECTION STANDARDS FOR LAND USE CHANGE PERMITS SECTION 7-201 PROTECTION OF AGRICULTURAL LANDS Staff Comments: No agricultural lands will be disturbed by the continuation of the existing batch plant. SECTION 7-202 PROTECTION OF WILDLIFE HABITAT AREAS Staff Comments: The wildlife use patterns associated with this project have long been in place at this site. The major change in use at this site is that the extraction of sand and gravel aggregates will cease while the concrete batch plant operations will continue until the year 2028 on a 5.8 acre portion of the site. This reduced activity will benefit wildlife as well as the commitment to revegetate the 60+ acres of the site that have been disturbed by the sand and gravel extraction operations. The revegetation plan included in this application identifies a number of plant species including native and pasture grass mixtures that will create habitat for elk and deer on south facing slopes. SECTION 7-203 PROTETION OF WETLANDS AND WATERBODIES Staff Comments: There are no wetlands or waterbodies that will be disturbed by the activities associated with this project. SECTION 7-204 PROTECTION OF WATER QUALITY FROM POLLUTANTS Staff Comments: A stormwater management plan was previously prepared for this site to protect water quality from pollutants. Additionally, Lafarge has a water recycling facility on-site to prevent any process water to intermingle with run-off and stormwater. SECTION 7-205 EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION Staff Comments: Erosion and sedimentation will be adequately managed per the applicant's submitted erosion and sedimentation plan. SECTION 7-206 DRAINAGE Staff Comments: Drainage will be adequately managed per the applicant's submitted drainage plan and engineering report. SECTION 7-207 STORMWATE RUN-OFF Staff Comments: Stormwater Run-off will be adequately managed per the applicant's submitted stormwater management plan and engineering report. 12 1 Board of County Commissioners December 5, 2011 M I PA -6919 SECTION 7-208 AIR QUALITY Staff Comments: The lessee, Lafarge, currently meets the standards for air quality as verified in their Construction permit as issued by the CDPHE Air Quality Control Division. SECTION 7-209 AREAS SUBJECT TO WILDFIRE HAZARDS Staff Comments: Wildfire hazard at the existing batch plant site is negligible as no existing vegetation exists on the impacted area 68+/- acres of this site. SECTION 7-210 AREAS SUBJECT TO NATURAL HAZARDS AND GEOLOGICAL HAZARDS Staff Comments: No geological or geotechnical conditions were identified on this site which would preclude the continued use of this site. SECTION 7-211 AREAS WITH ARCHEOLOGICAL, PALEONOTLOGICAL OR HISTORICAL IMPORTANCE Staff Comments: No protected or registered areas with archeological, paleontological or historical importance will be disturbed by the continued use of this site. SECTION 7-212 RECLAMATION Staff Comments: Reclamation and landscaping will be adequately implemented. The applicant has a current reclamation plan filed with the state in which the state will oversee, as required, the reclamation of the site. E. SECTION 7-300 SITE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS SECTION 7-301 COMPATIBLE DESIGN Staff Comments: The existing concrete batch plant site has been organized to maximize the existing setbacks from SH 82 and CR 103 with berming and landscape buffering. The operations of activities on the site shall continue to be managed to avoid nuisances to adjacent uses relating to hours of operations, parking, service delivery, and location of service areas and docks. SECTION 7-302 BUILDING DESIGN Staff Comments: No new buildings are being proposed. SECTION 7-303 DESIGNAND SCALE OF DEVELOPMENT Staff Comments: No new buildings or structures are being proposed. SECTION 7-304 OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING STANDARDS Staff Comments: No new parking areas are being proposed. 13 1 Board of County Commissioners December 5, 2011. M I PA -6919 SECTION 7-305 LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING STANDARDS Staff Comments: Landscaping will be adequately implemented per the applicant's revised landscaping and reclamation plan. However, the applicant is proposing planting 1 to 1 Y2 inch caliper Narrowleaf Cottonwood trees. Section 7-305.A.7.a. requires that deciduous trees shall be a minimum of 2 inch caliper. Any new exterior lighting (none currently proposed) shall be designed in compliance with the requirements of Section 7-305(B), Lighting Standards. SECTION 7-306 SNOW STORAGE STANDARDS Staff Comments: A designated area, sufficient to store snow from the entire parking area for the batch plant has been provided on-site. Required off-street parking and loading areas will not be used for snow storage. Snow stored in open areas will not be located in a manner that restricts access or circulation, or obstructs the view of motorists. The traveled area of public roadways will not be used for snow storage. Adequate drainage has been provided for the snow storage area to accommodate snowmelt and to ensure it does not drain onto adjacent property. SECTION 7-307 ROADWAY STANDARDS Staff Comments: The revised project road system provides adequate and efficient circulation within the development and provides reasonable access to the public highway. Any consideration of approval of this project should condition approval upon designing, signing and permitting necessary road improvements per CDOT and County regulations. SECTION 7-308 TRAIL AND WALKWAY STANDARDS Staff Comments: No new sidewalks or paths are being proposed. SECTION7-309 UTILITY STANDARDS Staff Comments: No new utilities are being proposed. F. SECTION 7-810 ADDITIONAL STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO INDUSTRIAL USE 1. Enclosed Building. All fabrication, service and repair operations shall be conducted within an enclosed building or obscured by a fence, natural topography or landscaping. Staff Comments: The batch plant operations are proposed to continue in their existing location on the floor of the gravel quarry. Natural topography, existing hillsides as well as existing and proposed berms are intended to obscure the continued operation of the plant. 2. Loading and Unloading. All operations involving loading and unloading of vehicles shall be conducted on private property and shall not be conducted on a public right-of-way. Staff Comments: All loading and unloading of vehicles will be conducted on private property. 3. Outdoor Storage Facilities. All outdoor storage facilities for fuel, raw materials and products shall be screened by natural topography or enclosed by a fence or wall adequate to conceal such facilities from adjacent property. 14 Board of County Commissioners December 5, 2011 MIPA-6919 Staff Comments: All outside storage will continue to be screened by natural topography or enclosed by a site -obscuring fence to obstruct the storage area from view by adjacent properties. 4. Industrial Wastes. All industrial wastes shall be disposed of in a manner consistent with statutes and requirements of CDPHE. Staff Comments: The batch plant operations will not produce industrial waste. All fuel or oil that is used will continue be covered under the spill plans as submitted. 5. Sound. The volume of sound generated shall comply with the standards set forth in the Colorado Revised Statutes. Staff Comments: Lafarge will continue to comply with all noise statutes. Noise associated with the operations of a batch plant is referenced in the Analysis of Noise from Proposed Cerise Gravel Mine prepared by Hankard Environmental, Inc. as submitted. The proposed project will continue to operate primarily during the 'daytime', as defined by CRS §25-12-103 (7:00 am to 7:00 pm) while administrative and maintenance activities are allowed from 6:00 pm to 8:00 pm, which are considered acoustically insignificant. To note, the Cerise Mine has different operating times which can be found in '.Resolution 2011-44, Condition 14. The existing berm to the north of the batch plant will be retained to reduce sound levels in that direction. In addition, a new berm is proposed along Highway 82 to mitigate sound that may travel to the southern edge of the site. 6. Ground Vibration. Every use shall be operated so that the ground vibration inherently and recurrently generated is not perceptible without instruments at any point of any boundary line of the property. Staff Comments: There will be no to imperceptible levels of vibration from the batch plant operation. There will be no screening or crushing of material on site and all loading is done on paved areas to reduce the already minimal vibration. 7. Interference, Nuisance or Hazard. Every use shall be so operated that it does not emit heat, glare, radiation or fumes which substantially interfere with the existing use of adjoining property or which constitutes a public nuisance or hazard. Flaring of gases, aircraft warning signal and reflective painting of storage tanks, or other legal requirements for safety or air pollution control measures shall be exempted from this provision. Staff Comments: Lafarge currently meets the standards for air, glare, radiation or fumes which may substantially interfere with the existing use of adjoining property or which constitutes a public nuisance or hazard. F. SECTION 7-814 ADDITIONAL STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO MINING AND EXTRACTION USE 1. Roads a. Impact Mitigation. The mining operator or owner shall bear the proportionate cost of all road and bridge improvements, repairs, and maintenance necessitated by the proposed mining operation. Staff Comments: Lafarge has existing roadway maintenance agreements with the County and State to maintain haul routes, however CR 103 is not a designated haul route. An agreement for improvements will be required to address commitments by the 15 Board of County Commissioners December 5, 2011 MIPA-6919 Applicant related to the dedication of right-of-way, installation and maintenance of the new access and any improvements deemed necessary to CR 103 and SH 82. b. Vehicle Weight. The weight of trucks shall not exceed federal, state or local government imposed road or bridge weight capacity on approved haulage routes, as those routes are established by the procedures in the Garfield County Overweight Vehicle Regulations. Staff Comments: Lafarge will continue to weigh all trucks leaving the site to ensure that they meet vehicle weight guidelines. c. Seasonal Traffic Limitation. As a condition of approval, the County may impose limits on the number of trucks that may access the mine to avoid damage to roads caused by heavy vehicle use, weather conditions or water saturation. Staff Comments: Lafarge weighs all trucks leaving the site to ensure that they meet vehicle weight guidelines. No traffic limitations have been proposed. 2. Routing. Designation of construction and haul routes for a specific mining operation application shall comply with the following standards: a. Avoidance of developed areas. Truck haulage and traffic routes shall be designed to the maximum extent feasible to avoid residential areas, commercial areas, environmentally and visually sensitive areas, schools and other civic buildings, municipalities and already congested locations. Alternative routes shall be identified. Staff Comments: The current and proposed truck routes from the site are designed to avoid residential areas and heavily populated or sensitive areas. b. Timing of hauling. Timing of truck traffic may be controlled to prevent congestion or noise impacts or safety risks. Staff Comments: The proposed Project will continue to operate primarily during the 'daytime', as defined by CRS §25-12-103 (7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.) while administrative and maintenance activities will continue to be allowed from 6:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. Lafarge understands that there might be limitations on haul times related to this schedule if deemed necessary by the County, however, no limitation is currently being proposed. c. Load Control. Applicant shall prevent loss of loads and fugitive dust emissions during transit, and shall be responsible to ensure that haul routes are maintained in accordance with dust -suppressant methods required by applicable state or federal agency. Staff Comments: Lafarge should continue to ensure that loads coming onto the site are covered or otherwise maintained to control dust and prevent loss. Once mining is complete all loads will leave the site in enclosed ready mix drums. 3. Wildlife. Mining operations shall mitigate any impacts not located in wildlife habitat areas as identified by the Colorado Division of Wildlife. Staff Comments: Wildlife use patterns associated with the batch plant have long been in place at this site. The major change in use at this site is that the extraction of sand and gravel aggregates 161 Board of County Commissioners December 5, 2011 MIPA-6919 will cease while the concrete batch plant operations will continue until the year 2028 on a 5.8 acre portion of the site. This reduced activity will benefit wildlife as well as the commitment to revegetate the over 60 acres of the site that have been disturbed by the sand and gravel extraction operations. The revegetation plan included in this application identifies a number of plant species including native and pasture grass mixtures that will create habitat for elk and deer on south facing slopes. 4. Emergency Preparedness. The site operator shall prepare an emergency preparedness plan and have it on site and provided to the appropriate emergency providers for the site. Staff Comments: Lafarge has a full emergency plan for this site including emergency equipment maps, emergency phone numbers and evacuation plans, of which the applicant can make available, if necessary. IV. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION In a 6-0 vote, the Planning Commission recommended approval of this Major Impact Review with three modifications (condition 5.d, 5.q, and omission of 5.o) to the recommended conditions as prepared in the Planning Commission's staff report. Since that time, staff has continued to work with the applicant to refine the conditions based upon the Planning Commission's recommendation, additional work by the applicant, CDOT and County Road and Bridge in regards to traffic impacts and road improvements, and has made several grammatical corrections. Staff has not included the Planning Commission's original recommendations for approval in this staff report, but has included the conditions that reflect their approval recommendation and those conditions that have been updated due to the applicant addressing a number of the conditions. V. RECOMMENDED FINDINGS At the time of the production of this staff report, staff recommends the following findings and conditions: 1. That the proper public notice was provided as required for the hearings before the Board of County Commissioners; and. 2. That the hearing before the Board of County Commissioners was extensive and complete, that all pertinent facts, matters and issues were submitted or could be submitted and that all interested parties were heard at those meetings; and 3. That the application, if all conditions are met, can be in conformance with the applicable sections of the Garfield County Unified Land Use Resolution of 2008, as amended. 4. That 1 %: inch caliper Narrowleaf Cottonwood trees are an appropriate deviation to Section 7- 305.A.7.a. of the ULUR of 2008. 171 Board of County Commissioners December 5, 2011 M I PA -6919 5. The proposed use is the best interest of the health, safety, morals, convenience, order, prosperity and welfare of the citizens of Garfield County so long as the following conditions are met: a. That all representations made by the Applicant in the application, and at the public hearing before the Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners, shall be conditions of approval, unless specifically altered by the Board of County Commissioners; b. That the operation of the facility be done in accordance with all applicable Federal, State and Local regulations governing the operation of this type of facility; c. All new lighting associated with the property shall be directed inward and downward towards the interior of the property; d. Prior to the issuance of a Land Use Change Permit, the applicant shall resolve with County Road and Bridge and CDOT outstanding issues with road improvements and access which include but are not limited to: i. Appropriate Signage. The applicant shall work with County Road and Bridge to determine the appropriate type and placement of signage including but not limited to stop signs, truck warning signs and speed signs. ii. Relocation of Private Driveway. The Applicant shall work with County Road and Bridge to determine the appropriate location for the proposed private driveway access taking into account stacking distance and site distance. The applicant will provide a copy of an approved Driveway Access Permit to the Planning Department. iii. CR 103 and SH 82 Improvements. The Applicant shall work with CDOT and County Road and Bridge to determine the necessity of any additional road improvements, including but not limited to turn lanes, deceleration/acceleration lanes, and drainage improvements. A copy of an approved CDOT access permit shall be provided to the Planning Department. iv. Improvements Agreement. The Applicant shall design, engineer, construct and provide adequate financial security for any work to be completed on CR 103, in a form as required by the County and pursuant to the Garfield County Road and Right-of-way Regulations. e. The applicant shall deed to the County all portions of CR 103 that fall upon or cross the Crystal Ranch Corp. property. 18 Board of County Commissioners December 5, 2011 MIPA-6919 f. All vehicles using County Road 103 to access the Crystal Ranch Corp Concrete Batch Plant shall abide by Garfield County's oversize/overweight system. All vehicles requiring oversize/overweight permits shall be obtained from the Garfield County Road and Bridge Department. g. All trucks using the site access and/or CR 103 shall not use engine Jake Brakes to decelerate. h. The concrete batch plant shall be allowed to operate Monday through Saturday from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. while on-site administrative and/or maintenance activities may operate Monday through Saturday 6:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. There shall be no operations on Sunday except in the case of an emergency or for standard maintenance purposes. i. All noise generated from the operation shall not exceed the maximurn permissible limits set forth in C.R.S. § 25-12-103. j. The property owner and operator acknowledge that Garfield County has the following performance standards, and failure to comply with such standards could lead to revocation of the Land Use Change Permit: i. All fabrication, service and repair operations shall be conducted within an enclosed building or obscured by a fence, natural topography or landscaping; ii. All operations involving loading and unloading of vehicles shall be conducted on private property and shall not be conducted on a public right-of-way; iii. All industrial wastes shall be disposed of in a manner consistent with statutes and requirements of Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment; iv. Every use shall be operated so that the ground vibration inherently and recurrently generated is not perceptible without instruments at any point of any boundary line of the property; and v. Every use shall be operated so that it does not emit, heat, glare, radiation, dust, or fumes which substantially interfere with the existing use of adjoining property or which constitutes a public nuisance or hazard. Flaring of gases, aircraft warning signal and reflective painting of storage tanks, or other legal requirements for safety or air pollution control measures shall be exempted from this provision. k. The applicant shall implement the revised landscaping plan in areas outside of those directly impacted by the continued operation of the concrete batch plant by April 30, 2013. The full extent of the landscaping plan shall be implemented upon the termination of the batch plant lease in 2028. 19 1 Board of County Commissioners December 5, 2011 MIPA-6919 I. Prior to the issuance of a Land Use Change Permit an Emergency Preparedness Pian shall be submitted to the Planning Department. m. Gravel for this concrete batch plant shall be hauled from Cerise Mine except for limited quantities of specialty products not available at this location which may be brought in from other sources. Contrary to any provision in the County's Unified Land Use Resolution in effect at the time of the request, the Director of Building and Planning or the Board of County Commissioners may consider any change to this condition of approval as either a "non -substantial change" or a "substantial change" depending upon the evidence of any changes to off-site impacts of the approved Land Use Change Permit, and the requested change will be reviewed accordingly, n. All conditions of approval will remain in full force as required in Resolution 1980-58 John G. Powers SUP) in addition to the conditions herein. IIV. RECOMMENDED MOTION I move to approve a Land Use Change Permit through the Major Impact Review for the Substantial Modification to SUP per Resolution 1980-58, as requested by Crystal Ranch Corp with the findings and conditions, as recommended in this staff report, 20 1