HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication - PermitI
Garfield County
Building & Planning Department
108 8th Street, Suite #401 Glenwood Springs, Co. 81601
Office :970-945-8212 Fax: 970-384-3470
Inspection Line: 970-384-5003
Building Permit No.
Parcel No: 2127-251-00-068
Locality: AMD Antlers Orchard Loto{\
Job Address: LaFrenz Lane, Silt
--------------------------~--------------------
Use of Building: _______ s_/f_o_n _cr_aw_l_s,__pa_c_e _w_/o_,__pe_n_&_c_o_v-'-pa_t_io_s _& _at_ta_ch_e_d_,g'-ar_a,__ge ______ _
Owner: Zarlengo, Anthony & Catherine
Contractor: Jefferis Construction
Fees: Plan Check: $ 1 '111.86 Septic: $ 173.00
Bldg Permit: $ 1,710.55 Other Fees:
Total Fees: $ 2,995.41
Clerk: Date: q::~q« I
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11 Gara ge:
GARFI ELD C OUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLI CATIO N
I 08 g~~> St reet , Suite 401 , Gle nwood S prin gs, Co 8 1601
Phone: 970-945-82 12/ Fax: 970-38 4-3470 I In specti on Line: 970-384-5 003
www .garfield-county .co m
Ne w o Alterati on o Additi on
Se pti c:
· ISDS
12 Dri veway Permit: O wne rs valuati o n o f Work: $~2000
Authority. Thi s apptication for a Buildin g Permi t mus t be signed by the Owner of the propeny, descri bed above , or an authori zed agent. If the sig natu re be low is not th at of the Owner, a separate
letter of authorit y, signed by the Owner, must be provided with thi s Apptication .
Legal Access. A Bui ldin g Permit cannot be issued wi thout proof of lega l and adequate access to the prope n y for purposes of inspectio ns by the Buildi ng Depanment.
Other Permits . Mu ltipl e se parat e pe rmi ts may be required: {I ) State El ectri cal Permit, (2) Co unty ISDS Permit, (3) an oth er permit req uired for use on the propeny id entified above, e.g. State or
Count y Hi ghway/ Road Access or a Sta te Wastewater Discharge Permi t.
Void Permit-A Buildin g Permi t becomes null and void if the work auth ori zed is not commenced withi n 180 days of the date of iss uance and if work is suspen ded or abandoned for a pe ri od of 180
days after co mme nceme nt.
CERTIFI CATION
I he reby certify that 1 have read this Apptication and th at the informati on co ntai ned above is true and correct. I un ders ta nd tha t the Build ing Depanrne nt accep ts the Appti cation, alo ng wi th the plans
and specificat ions and oth er data submitt ed by me or on my behalf(sub mi ttals), based upon my ce rti fication as to accuracy.
Ass umin g comp lete nes s of the submi tta ls and appro val of thi s Appti cation, a Buildin g Permit will be issued granting pe rmi ssio n to me , as Owner, to co nstru ct th e structu re(s) and fac iliti es detail ed on
the su bmit tals reviewed by the Buildin g Depanment.
In consideration of the issuance of the Bu il ding Permi t, I agree th at I and my age nts w ill comply with prov isions o f any federal, sta te or local law regulati ng the work and the Garfield County Buil ding
Code, ISDS regu lations and app ti cable land use regulations (County Regu lation(s)). I acknowledge that the Bu ilding Permi t ma y be suspended or revoked, upon noti ce from the County, if the locatio n.
co nstructi on or use of the structure (s) and facili ty{ies), descri bed above, are not in comptiance with County Regul ati on(s) or any other applicable law.
I he reby grant permi ssion to the Building Depanrnent to enter the propeny, desc ribed above. to inspec t the work. I funher acknow ledge that the iss uance of the Bui lding Pe rmit does not prevent the
Buil ding Official from: (1) req uiring the correction of errors in the submit ta ls, if any, di scove red after iss uance; or (2) stoppi ng constru ction or use o f the structure(s) o r fac ility(ies) if such is in viola ti on
of County Regul at ion(s) or any other app ti cab le law.
Revie w of thi s Ap pli ca ti on, includin g submitta ls, and in spec ti ons of th e work by the Buildin g De partment do not consti tute an acceptance of respo nsibili ty or li ability by the County of errors, omi ssions
or discrepancies. As the Owner, I ac kn ow ledge that res ponsibility for co mpliance with federal , state and local laws and Count y Regulati ons res t with me and my autho ri ze d age nts , includin g without
li mitation my arc hit ect designer, engineer an d/ or builder.
I HER EBY ACKN OW LEDG E THAT I HAV E READ AND UN DERSTAND THE NOTI CE & CERTIFI CATION ABOVE :
STAFF USE ONLY
Special Conditions:
Adjusted Val u ation: Plan Check Fe~ Permit Fee: Manu home Fee: Mis cFees :
??-I "rt.. 4t' \11o5'5 l \ \ \
ISDS Fee: <S"O Total Fees: Fees Paid : Balance Due: BP No & Issue Date: ISDS No & Issued Date:
\-4~ ~q4 )'41 \\3:).~ ' f(L\ '1 '1 \ \t>" \3 L\YL\.0
Setbacks: OCCGroup: Const Type: Zoning:
BLDG DEPT: PLNGDEPT:
,U,.t \L\t L-\ ,.')_. ~ ... oB-t! .1 \UL Lt-z "3--<-r
APPl flt\th\J . DATE AP~ 'ROX~L DATE
~
The following items are required by Garfield County for a final Inspection:
1) A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector.
2) Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department and posted at the
structure and where readily visible from access road .
3) A finished roof; a lockable building; completed exterior siding; exterior doors and windows
installed; a complete kitchen with cabinets, sink with hot & cold running water, non-absorbent
kitchen floor covering, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove and refrigerator; all
necessary plumbing.
4) All bathrooms must be complete, with washbowl, tub or shower, toilet, hot an d cold running
water, non-absorbent floors, walls finished, and privacy door.
5) Steps over three (3) risers, outside or inside must be must have handrails. Balconies and decks
over 30" high must be constructed to all IBC and IRC requirements including guardrails.
6) Outside grading completed so that water slopes away from the building;
7) Exceptions to the outside steps, decks, grading may be made upon the demon stration of
extenuating circumstances ., i .e. weather. Under such circumstances A Certificate of
Occupancy may be issued conditionally.
8) A final inspection sign off by the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department for driveway
ins tallation, where applicable; as well as any final sign off by the Fire District, and/or State
Agencies where applicable.
A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (C.O.) WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE
ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED.
A C.O. MAY TAKE UP TO 5 BUSINESS DAYS TO BE PROCESSED AND ISSUED.
OWNER CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A C.O. IS ISSUED.
OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL BE CONSIDERED AN
ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATING PREMISES
UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET.
I understand and agree to abide by the above conditions for occupancy, use and the issuance of a
C.O . for the building identified in the Building Permit.
VALUATION FEE DETERMINATION
Applicant
Address
Date
.;oZ:::a';:'rl::::en_,.g";o;-----------Subdivision
Lefrenz Ln. Lot/Block
.=4:.;:/2:'::3:'::/2:'::0'::0':;8"-----------Contractor
Finished (Livable Area):
Main
Upper
Lower
Other
Total
Basement:
Unfinished
Square Feet
Valuation
Conversion of Unfinished to Finished
Total Valuation
Garage:
Valuation
Crawl Space
Valuation
Decks/ Patios
Valuation
Covered
Open
Type of Construction:
Occupancy:
Valuation
Total Valuation
2436 sf
sf
sf
sf X $74.68
2436 sf
sf X $41.00
sf X $33.68
992 sf X $18.00
2436 sf X $9.00
64 sf X $24.00'0"
368 sf X $12.00
Commercial
sf X
sf X
sf X
sf X
sf X
sf X
Antlers Drc.#t..o.rJ..-~ P .. cvl ifl{qf-
29
Jeffries Cons!
181,920.48
0.00
17,856.00
21,924.00
IS .3'..
'"l'·lfb -5,952.00
0.00
227,652.48
PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST
Applicant ZA-rz.J.rwd .o
Building
----.ILEngineered Foundation
----!.L'Driveway Permit p11.w-k
-----..L._ Surveyed Site Plan
___v8eptic Permit and Setbacks
~Grade/Topography 30%
~ach Residential Plan Review List
L Minimum Application Questionnaire
ri'J.. .Subdivision Plat Notes
4-Fire Department Review
_L_ Valuation Determination/Fees
V Red Line Plans/Stamps/Sticker
~!tach Conditions
----LL._ Application Signed
~Plan Reviewer To Sign Application
V Parcel/Schedule No.
*40# Snowload Letter-Manf. Hms.
V Soils Report
GENERAL NOTES:
Date. __ '-/,_-_,2::..'3=---0""--"</ __ _
Planning/Zoning
~roperty Line Setbacks
V30ft Stream Setbacks
~oodPlain
___t_Ll3uilding Height
!./"'Zoning Sign-off
~Road Impact Fees
J' HOA/DRC Approval
Vorade/Topography 40%
~Planning Issues
*-Subdivision Plat Notes
GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING
970-945-8212
MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS
For
SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING CONSTRUCTION
Including
NEW CONSTRUCTION
ADDITIONS
ALTERATIONS
And
MOVED BUILDINGS
In order to understand the scope of the work intended under a permit application and expedite the
issuance of a permit it is important that complete information be provided. When reviewing a plan and
it's discovered that required information has not been provided by the applicant, this will result in the
delay of the permit issuance and in proceeding with building construction. The owner or contractor shall
be required to provide this information before the plan review can proceed. Other plans that are in line
for review may be given attention before the new information may be reviewed after it has been
provided to the Building Department.
TWO (2) SETS OF CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS & TWO (2) SITE PLANS MUST BE
SUBMITTED FOR ALL APPLICATIONS.
Please review this document to determine if you have enough information to design your project
and provide adequate information to facilitate a plan review. Also, please consider using a design
professional for assistance in your design and a construction professional for construction of your
project. Any project with more than ten (10) occupants requires the plans to be sealed by a
Colorado Registered Design Professional.
To provide for a more understandable plan in order to determine compliance with the building, plumbing
and mechanical codes, applicants are requested to review the following checklist prior to and during
design. Applicants are required to indicate appropriately and to submit the completed checklist at
time of application for a permit.
Plans to be included for a Building Permit, must be on drafting paper at least 18"x24" and drawn
to scale.
I
Plans must include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations all sides with decks,
balcony, steps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the finish grade line and
original grade. A section showing in detail, from the bottom of the footing to the top of the roof,
including re-bar, anchor bolts, pressure treated plates, floor joists, wall studs and spacing, insulation,
sheeting, house-rap, (which is required), siding or any approved building material. Engineered
foundations may be required.
A window schedule. A door schedule. A floor framing plan, a roof framing plan, roof must be
designed to withstand a 40 pound per square foot up to 7,000 feet in elevation, a 90 M.P.H. wind speed,
wind exposure B or C, and a 36 inch frost depth.
All sheets to be identified by number and indexed. All of the above requirements must be met or your
plans will be returned.
All plans submitted must be incompliance with the 2003 IRC.
1. Is a site plan included that identifies the location of the proposed structure or addition and distances to
the property lines from each corner of the proposed structure(s) prepared by a licensed surveyor
and has the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing? Properties with slopes of
30% or greater must be shown on the site plan. (NOTE Section: 106.2) Any site plan for the
placement of any portion of a structure within 50 ft. of a property line and not within a previously
surveyed building envelope on a subdivision final plat shall be prepared by a licensed surveyor
and have the surveyor's signature and professional stamp on the drawing. Any structure to be
built within a building envelope of a lot shown on a recorded subdivision plat shall include a
copy of the building envelope as it is shown on the final plat with the proposed structure located
within the envelope.
Yes .r
2. Does the site plan also include any other buildings on the property, setback easements and utility
easements? Please refer to Section 5.05.03 in the Garfield County Zoning Resolution if the
property you are applying for a building pennit on is located on a corner lot. Special setbacks do
apply.
Y es.__,.r"------
3. Does the site plan include when applicable the location of the LS.D.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal
System) and the distances to the property lines, wells (on subject property and adjacent
properties), streams or water courses?
Y es.__,.r"------
4. Does the site plan indicate the location and direction of the County or private road accessing the
property?
Yes/
2
5. Are you aware that prior to submittal of a building permit application you are required to show proof
of a legal and adequate access to the site? This may include (but is not limited to) proof of your
right to use a private easement/right of way; A County Ro ad and Bridge permit; a Colorado Dept.
of Highway Permit, including a Notice to Proceed; a permit from the federal government or any
combination. You can contact the Road & Bridge Department at 625-8601. See phone book for
other agencies
Yes_.~~----
6. Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all reinforcing steel
in accordance with the IRC or per stamped engineered design?
Yes.L..c::-___ _
7 . Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl spaces and the
clearances required between wood and earth?
Yes ~ No ____ _
8. Do the plans indicate the size and location of ventilation openings for the attic, roof joist spaces and
soffits?
Yes No ____ _
9. Do the plans include design loads as required by Garfield County for roof snow loads, (a minimum of
40 pounds per square foot up to & including 7,000 feet above sea level), floor loads and wind
loads?
Yes .,...-
10. Does the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation, wall , floor, and roof
construction?
Yes .,....-
11. Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists, wall studs, ceiling joists,
roof rafters or joists or trusses?
Yes --"""-------
12 . Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method of positive connection of all
columns and beams ?
Yes / --------
13. Does the elevation plan indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the
undisturbed grade to the midpoint between the ridge and eave of a gable or shed roof or the top
of a flat roof? (Building height measurement usually not to exceed 25 feet)
Yes ,./ ..::;.._ ____ _
14 . Does the plan include any stove or zero clearance fireplace planned for installation including make
and model and Colorado Phase II certifications or phase II EPA certification?
Yes / No -------
3
15. Does the plan include a masonry fireplace including a fireplace section indicating design to comply
with the IRC?
Yes No / ------
16. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that egress/rescue windows from
sleeping rooms and/or basements comply with the requirements of the IRC?
Yes_!:/:__ ___ _
17. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that windows provide natural light and
ventilation for all habitable rooms?
Yes -"'-------
18. Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass doors, glazing
immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as a walking
surface; sliding glass doors ; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub enclosures and specify safety
glazing for these areas?
Yes ~ No _______ _
19. Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces, boilers and water heaters indicated on
the plan?
Yes /
20. Do you understand that if you are building on a parcel of land created by the exemption process or the
subdivision process, are building plans in compliance with all plat notes and/or covenants?
Yes ~ ...::::;_ ___ _
21. Do you understand that if you belong to a Homeowners Association (HOA), it is your responsibility to
obtain written permission from the association, if required by that association, prior to submitting
an application for a building permit? The building permit application will be accepted without
it, but you run the risk of the HOA bringing action to enforce the covenants, which can result in
revocation of permit issued. Additionally, your Plan Review fee is not refundable if the plans
have been reviewed by the Building Department prior to any action by the HOA that requires either
revocation or substantial modification of the plans.
Yes .,/
22 . Will this be the only residential structure on the parcel?
Yes / No If no-Explain: ______ _
23. Have two (2) complete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the application?
Yes_.,V"'.__ ___ _
24. Do you understand that the minimum dimension a home can be on a lot is 20ft.wl.de and 20ft. long?
Yes /
4
25. Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other construction code
requirements?
Yes /
26. Do your plans comply with all zoning rules and regulations in the County related to your properties
zone district?
Yes /
27. Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a final inspection
by the Garfield County Building Department?
Yes /
28. Do you understand that approval for design and/or construction changes are required prior to the
application ofthese changes?
Yes...!!/'-------
29. Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a "Plan Review" fee from you at the
time of application submittal and that you will be required to pay the "Permit Fee" as well as any
"Road Impact" or "Septic System" fees required, at the time you pick up your building permit?
Yes _,.... ..:;__ ___ _
30. Are you aware that you must call in for an inspection by 3:30 the business day before the
requested inspection in order to receive it the following business day? Inspections will be
made from 7:30 a.m. to 3:30p.m. Monday through Friday. Inspections are to be called in
to 384-5003.
Yes / No ------
31. Are you aware that requesting inspections on work that is not ready or not accessible will result in a
$50.00 re-inspection fee?
Yes / .::.._ ____ _
32. Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the IRC including
approval on a final inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy and occupancy of the
building?
Yes v
33. Are you aware that the Permit Application must be signed by the Owner or a written authority being
given for an Agent and that the party responsible for the project must comply with the IRC?
Yes /
5
34. Do you understand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed Electrician and
Plumber to perform installations and hookups, unless you as the homeowner are performing the
work? The license number of the person performing the work will be required at time of
applicable inspection.
Yes ~----------------
35. Are you aware, that on the front of the Building Permit Application you will need to fill in the
Parcel/Schedule Number for the lot you are applying for this permit on prior to submittal of a
building permit application? Your attention in this is appreciated.
Yes /
36. Do you know that the local fire district may require you to submit plans for their review of fire safety
issues?
Yes / (please check with the building department about this requirement)
37. Do you understand that if you are planning on doing any excavating or grading to the property prior
to issuance of a building permit that you will be required to obtain a grading permit?
Yes / =---------
38. Are you aware that if you will be connecting to a public water and/or sewer system , that the tap fees
have to be paid and the connections inspected by the service provider prior to the issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy?
Yes .r!.../ ______ __
I hereby acknowledge that I have read, understand and answered these questions to the best of
my ability.
S1gnature o er ate
Q76 · 25D · ?D ?5
Phone: Cf70 · 2'Sb -?o?(t (days);
q?o · ?So · ?6?.5 C(J6 -&?ltr5fl8
q?(J-2£1)-10?/p (evenings)
Project Name: 1arfeiYiF'Jit?sio/.enC?Q
Project Address: i.a£Wtn1.. iA_ap
6
Notes:
If any required information is missing delays in issuing the permit are to be expected. Work may not
proceed without the issuance of a permit. If it is determined by the Building Official that additional
information is necessary to review the application and plans to determine minimum compliance with the
adopted codes, the application may be placed behind more recent applications for building permits in the
review process and not reviewed until required information has been provided and the application rotates
again to first position for review, delay in issuance of the permit or delay in proceeding with
construction.
BpminreqDec2007
7
GARFIELD COUNTY
BUILDING REQUIREMENTS
Codes: 2003 IRC, IBC, IFGC, IMC, IPC,
Setbacks: Check subdivisions and zone district for setback requirements.
Snowload (measured at the roof): 40PSF up to 7000ft. elevation.
50PSF 7001 to 8000ft.
7 5PSF 8001 to 9000ft.
lOOP SF 9001 to 1 OOOOft.
Seismic design category: B
Weathering probability for concrete: Severe
Termite infestation probability: None to slight
Wind speed: 90mph
Decay probability: None to slight
Wind Exposure: B or C (see section R301.2.1.4)
Frost Depth: 36in. to 8000ft. elevation. 42in. 8001 and above.
Winter Design Temperature: Minus 2 to 7000ft.; minus 16 over 7000ft.
elevation.
Air Freezing Index: 2500deg F-days to 7000ft.; over 7000ft. to be determined by
Building Official.
Ice shield under-layment required.
Mean Annual temp.: Variable
Insulation: Maximum glazing U factor: 0.50
Minimum R-Values:
• Ceilings/roofs R values are: R-30 stick built
structures. R-38 log construction and steel
rafter construction.
• Walls R values are R-19 wood frame; R-19
cavity R-3 sheathing steel studs.
• Floors R-values are R-19.
• Basement wall R-values are R-10 befow
grade, R -19 above grade.
• Slab perimeter R-value and depth is R-
10/36in.
• Crawl space wall R-values are R-10 below
grade and R -19 above grade
If floors over crawl spaces are not insulated, the crawl space walls must be
insulated. Basement wall must be insulated to frost depth. Common walls
garage to house must have R -19 insulation. Common ceiling/floor garage
to house must have R -19. Take precautions to protect plumbing in these
areas.
June 24, 2008
We have submitted plans for building a house on 0133 Lafrenz Lane. Lot #29. We are requesting to
c hange the gas fireplace to a wood burning stove. Which will be installed by a professional as it will be
included in the new construction of th e permane nt residence. Which the plans and permits have already
been submitted .
Thank you
Anthony and Cathy Zarlengo
1147 N. 16°' Street
Silt, Colorado 81652
970-250-7075
Contractor
Jeff Dickey
Jefferies Construction
0023 Lafrenz Lane
Silt, Co lorado 81652
970-876-5279
970-379-3986
April 5, 2008
To whom it may concern;
We will be building on lot 29 on LaFrenz Lane. The exterior will be stone stucco. Jeff Dickey will be the
general contractor, and construction is tentatively scheduled to start on around May 1, 2008.
~y~~
Tony and Cathy Zarlengo ~
rj)z~f/J4
(1:/
I 1 ! /f
\....-I· 1...· \.......-
¥ CTLITHOMPSON
I ,I
SOILS AND FOUNDATION INVESTIGATION
ZARLENGO RESIDENCE
LOT 29, LAFRENZ LANE
GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO
Prepared For:
TONY ZARLENGO
1147 North 16'" Street
Silt, CO 81652
Project No. GS05157-120
234 Center Drive I Glenwood Springs, Colomclo 8t 601
Telephone: 970·945·2809 Fax: 970-945-7 411
March 10, 2008
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SCOPE ............................................................................................................................................. 1
SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS ..................................................................................................... 1
SITE CONDITIONS ......................................................................................................................... 2
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ....................................................................................................... 2
SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS ......................................................................................................... 2
SITE EARTHWORK ........................................................................................................................ 3
Excavations .......................................................................................................•......................... 3
Sub-Excavation ..........................................................................................................•............... 4
Backfill ..............................................................•........................................•................................. 5
FOUNDATIONS ............................................................................................................................... 5
Footings on Structural Fill .....................................................................•.............................•..... 6
FLOOR SYSTEM AND SLABS-ON-GRADE .................................................................................. 6
BELOW-GRADE CONSTRUCTION ............................................................................................... 7
SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE ............................................................................................................ 8
SURFACE DRAINAGE .................................................................................................................... 9
LIMITATIONS .................................................................................................................................. 9
FIGURE 1 ·APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS
FIGURE 2-SUMMARY LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS
FIGURE 3-GRADATION TEST RESULTS
FIGURES 4 AND 5-SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS
FIGURE 6-EXTERIOR FOUNDATION WALL DRAIN
TABLE 1-SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
TONY ZARLENGO
ZARLENGO RESIDENCE
PROJECT NO. GS05157-120
S:IGS05157.000\12012. Reports\GS05157120 R1.doc
SCOPE
This report presents the results of our soils and foundation investigation for
the proposed Zarlengo Residence on Lot 29 on LaFrenz Lane in Garfield, Colorado.
We conducted the investigation to evaluate the subsurface conditions at the site and
provide geotechnical engineering recommendations for the planned construction.
Our report was prepared from data developed from our field exploration, laboratory
testing, engineering analysis, and experience with similar conditions. This report
includes a description of the subsurface conditions found in our exploratory borings
and our opinions and recommendations for design and construction of foundations,
floor systems, below-grade construction, drain systems and details influenced by the
subsoils. The recommendations contained in the report were developed based on the
currently planned construction. We should be informed if actual construction will
differ significantly from the descriptions herein. A summary of our conclusions is
presented below.
SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS
1. Subsurface conditions encountered in our exploratory borings
consisted of clayey sand with occasional sandstone gravel and
boulders and sandy clay lenses to the total explored depth of 30 feet
below existing ground surface. Free ground water was notfound in our
exploratory borings during drilling operations.
2. Our exploratory borings indicate that moderately to highly
compressible clayey sand is present at anticipated foundation
elevations. In our opinion, two foundation design alternatives should
be considered. The residence can be founded on footings on a
minimum 5-foot thickness of structural fill consisting ofthe natural soil
or a post-tensioned slab. Design criteria for the foundation alternatives
are presented in the report.
3. We understand that structural floors will be constructed in finished
living areas. From a geotechnical perspective structural floors are a
good choice. We recommend that exterior and garage slabs-on-grade
be placed on a minimum of a two-foot thick layer of structural fill. After
the sub-excavation process is accomplished, we judge that a slab-on-
grade garage floor can be supported by structural fill with a low
TONY ZARLENGO
ZARLENGO RESIDENCE
PROJECT NO. GS05157-120
S:IGS05157.000\12012. Reports\GS05157120 R1.doc
1
·.~ imf
potential risk of differential movement and associated damage.
Additional discussion is in the report.
4. Surface drainage should be designed to provide for rapid removal of
surface water away from the proposed residence. A foundation drain
should be installed around below-grade areas.
SITE CONDITIONS
LaFrenz Lane is a gravel road located about 3 miles north of Silt in Garfield
County, Colorado. Lot 29 is north of LaFrenz Lane and east of County Road 237 (see
Figure 1). Existing single-family residences are located south and west of Lot 29.
Ground surface on the lot slopes down to the southwest at grades of about5 percent.
A drainage way is present along the west lot boundary. Vegetation on the lot consists
of natural grasses and weeds.
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION
Building plans for the Zarlengo Residence were being developed at the time of
our investigation. We understand the residence will be a one-story, wood-frame
building. A structurally supported lower level floor with a crawl space below is
planned. No basement is planned. An attached garage is anticipated. Slab-on-grade
floors are constructed in the garage areas of similar residences in the vicinity of the
proposed Zarlengo Residence. Maximum excavation depths will be between 3 and 5
feet. We expect maximum foundation loads of 1 ,000 to 3,000 pounds per lineal foot of
foundation wall and maximum column loads of 30 kips. If actual construction will
differ significantly from the descriptions above, we should be informed so that we can
check that our recommendations are appropriate.
SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS
Subsurface conditions on Lot 29 on LaFrenz Lane were investigated by drilling
two exploratory borings (TH-1 and TH-2) with 4-inch diameter, solid-stem auger and a
track-mounted drill rig at the locations shown on Figure 1. Drilling operations were
TONY ZARLENGO
ZARLENGO RESIDENCE
PROJECT NO. G$05157-120
S:\GS05157.000\120\2. Reports\G$05157120 R1.doc
2
directed by our field representative who logged the soils encountered in the borings
and obtained samples for testing in our laboratory. Graphic logs of the soils found in
our exploratory borings are shown on Figure 2.
Subsurface conditions encountered in our exploratory borings consisted of
clayey sand with occasional sandstone gravel and boulders and sandy clay lenses to
the maximum explored depth of 30 feet below existing ground surface. Results of
field penetration resistance tests and observations during drilling indicated the sand
was loose to medium dense. Free ground water was not found in our exploratory
borings during drilling operations. Borings were backfilled immediately after drilling
operations were completed.
Samples obtained in the field were returned to our laboratory where typical
samples were selected for testing. Two samples of the soils selected for gradation
testing contained 53 and 1 percent gravel, 27 and 43 percent sand, and 20 and 56
percent clay and silt size particles (passing the No. 200 sieve). Two samples of the
sand were selected for one-dimensional, swell-consolidation testing. During the test
procedure the samples at in-situ moisture content were loaded with 1,000 psf and
then flooded. The resulting volume change (i.e., swell or consolidation) was then
measured. The samples of the sand tested exhibited moderate to high consolidation
(1.8 and 5.3 percent) when wetted under an applied load of 1,000 psf. Gradation test
results are shown on Figure 3. Results of swell-consolidation testing are shown on
Figures 4 and 5. Laboratory test results are summarized on Table I.
SITE EARTHWORK
Excavations
The planned excavation to construct the Zarlengo Residence will encounter
the natural sand soil. Excavations for the planned foundation and utilities at this lot
can be accomplished using conventional, heavy-duty excavation equipment.
Excavation sides will need to be sloped or braced to meet local, state and federal
TONY ZARLENGO
ZARLENGO RESIDENCE
PROJECT NO. GS05157-120
S:IGS05157.000\120\2. Reports\GS05157120 R1.doc
3
safety regulations. The sand will likely classify as a Type C soil based on OSHA
standards governing excavations. Temporary slopes deeper than 4 feet should be no
steeper than 1.5 to 1 (horizontal to vertical) in Type C soils. The contractor should
identify the soils encountered in excavations and refer to OSHA standards to
determine appropriate slopes.
Free ground water was not found in our exploratory borings during this
investigation. We do not anticipate excavations for foundations or utilities will
penetrate ground water. Excavations should be sloped to a positive gravity outfall or
to a temporary sump where water from precipitation can be removed by pumping.
Ground surfaces surrounding excavations should be sloped as much as practical to
direct runoff away from the excavations.
Sub-Excavation
Our exploratory borings indicate that moderately to highly compressible sands
are present at anticipated slab-on-grade and foundation elevations. In our opinion,
performance of foundations and slabs-on-grade would be enhanced by creating a
zone of moisture treated soils below the slabs. We recommend removal (i.e. sub-
excavation), moisture-treatment and recompaction ofthe soils below the foundations
to a depth of at least 3 feet below the bottom of foundations. Sub-excavations of the
soils below the slabs-on-grade to a depth of at least 2 feet below bottom of slab
elevations would enhance performance of the slabs after placement. The bottom of
the sub-excavated area should extend laterally at least 3 feet beyond the perimeter of
the foundation and slabs. The bottom of the sub-excavated area should be scarified
to a depth of at least 8 inches, moisture-treated and compacted. Our representative
should be called to observe conditions exposed in the sub-excavated area prior to
beginning placement of structural fill.
We recommend re-using the excavated soil as structural fill, provided it is free
of organics, debris and rocks larger than 3 inches in diameter. Structural fill below
building components should be moisture treated to 1 percent below to 3 percent
TONY ZARLENGO
ZARLENGO RESIDENCE
PROJECT NO. G$05157-120
S:IGS05157.000\120\2. Reports\GS05157120 R1.doc
4
above optimum moisture content and compacted to 100 percent of standard Proctor
(ASTM D 698) maximum dry density. Fill soils should be uniformly mixed to create a
relatively homogeneous fill soil. Additional water required to increase the existing soil
moisture content to the specified moisture content should be uniformly mixed into the
fill soil during mixing prior to compaction. We recommend fill be placed in maximum
loose lift thickness of 8 inches. The actual thickness of fill lift that can be properly
compacted will depend on the type of compaction equipment. In order for the
procedure to perform properly, close control of structural fill placement to
specifications is required. Our representative should observe placement and check
compaction and moisture content of the structural fill.
Backfill
Proper placement and compaction of backfill adjacent to foundation walls is
important to reduce infiltration of surface water and settlement of backfill soil.
Backfill should consist of the on-site soils or similar soils free of organics, debris and
rocks larger than 4 inches in diameter. Backfill should be placed in loose lifts of 8
inches thick or less, moisture-treated to 2 percent below to 2 percent above optimum
moisture content and compacted to at least 95 percent of standard Proctor (ASTM D
698) maximum dry density. The top 1 to 2 feet of backfill should consist of a clay soil
to limit infiltration of surface water.
FOUNDATIONS
Our exploratory borings and site investigation indicate that moderately to
highly compressible clayey sand and sandy clay is present at anticipated foundation
elevations of the proposed Zarlengo Residence. The natural soil on the lot has the
potential to settle as a result of changes in moisture content. The residence can be
constructed on footings, after the soils are sub-excavated to a depth of at least 3 feet
below bottom offootings, moisture-treated and recompacted. Sub-excavation deeper
than 3 feet would reduce potential for future foundation settlement. Close control of
TONY ZARLENGO
ZARLENGO RESIDENCE
PROJECT NO. GS05157-120
S:IGS051 57.000112012. Reports\GS05157 120 R 1.doc
5
structural fill placement and compaction is necessary. Recommendations in the Sub-
Excavation section should be followed.
Footings on Structural Fill
1. The footing foundation should be constructed on a minimum three-foot
thickness of structural fill. Where soils are loosened during excavation
or in the footing forming process, or if any loose or soft soils are
encountered at the footing level, the soils should be removed or
compacted to at least 100 percent of standard Proctor maximum dry
density (ASTM D 698) between 1 percent below and 3 percent above
optimum moisture content, prior to placing concrete.
2. Footings should be designed for a maximum soil pressure of 3,000 psf.
3. Footings should have a minimum width of 16 inches. Foundations for
isolated columns should have minimum dimensions of24 inches by 24
inches. Larger sizes may be required depending upon the loads and
structural system used.
4. Foundation walls should be well reinforced, top and bottom. We
recommend reinforcement sufficient to span an unsupported distance
of at least 12 feet or the distance between pads, whichever is greater.
Reinforcement should be designed by the structural engineer
considering the effects of large openings and lateral loads on wall
performance.
5. Exterior footings must be protected from frost action. Normally, 3 feet
of frost cover is assumed in the area. The Garfield County building
department should be consulted regarding required frost protection
depth.
6. The completed foundation excavation should be observed by a
representative of our firm prior to placing the forms to verify
subsurface conditions are as anticipated from our borings
FLOOR SYSTEM AND SLABS-ON-GRADE
We anticipate that the owner will desire a slab-on-grade floor in the garage.
We recommend that soils below slabs be sub-excavated to a depth of at least 2 feet
below bottom of slab elevation, moisture-treated and recompacted. The process was
described in the Sub-Excavation section. After the sub-excavation process is
TONY ZARLENGO
ZARLENGO RESIDENCE
PROJECT NO. GS05157-120
S:\GS05157.0001120\2. ReportsiGS05157 120 R1.doc
6
accomplished, we judge slab-on-grade construction can be supported by the
structural fill with low potential for differential movement and associated damage.
We recommend the following precautions for slab-on-grade construction at
this site. These precautions will not prevent movement from occurring, they tend to
reduce damage if slab movement occurs.
1. We recommend against placing a sand or gravel layer below slabs.
Provision of a sand or gravel layer below slabs increases the possibility
of a single source of water wetting the entire area supporting the slab.
2. Slabs should be separated from exterior walls and interior bearing
members with slip joints which allow free vertical movement of the
slabs.
3. Plumbing and utilities which pass through slabs should be isolated
from the slab with sleeves and be constructed with flexible
connections to slab supported appliances.
4. Exterior patio and porch slabs should be isolated from the residence.
These slabs should be well-reinforced to function as independent units.
Movements of these slabs should not be transmitted to the residence
foundation.
5. Frequent control joints should be provided, in accordance with
American Concrete Institute (ACI) recommendations, to reduce
problems associated with shrinkage and curling. Our experience
indicates panels which are approximately square generally perform
better than rectangular areas.
BELOW-GRADE CONSTRUCTION
Foundation walls which extend below-grade should be designed for lateral
earth pressures where backfill is not present to about the same extent on both sides
of the wall. Many factors affect the values of the design lateral earth pressure. These
factors include, but are not limited to, the type, compaction, slope and drainage of the
backfill, and the rigidity of the wall against rotation and deflection. For a very rigid
wall where negligible or very little deflection will occur, an "at-rest" lateral earth
pressure should be used in design. For walls which can deflect or rotate 0.5 to 1
TONY ZARLENGO
ZARLENGO RESIDENCE
PROJECT NO. G$05157-120
S:\GS05157.000\12012. Reports\GS05157 120 R1.doc
7
percent of wall height (depending upon the backfill types), lower "active" lateral earth
pressures are appropriate. Thus, the earth pressures on the walls will likely be
between the "active" and "at-rest" conditions.
We recommend design of below-grade walls using an equivalent fluid density
of at least 50 pcf for this site. Backfill placed adjacent to foundation wall exteriors
should be in accordance with the recommendations in the Backfill section. This
equivalent density does not include allowances for sloping backfill, surcharges or
hydrostatic pressures. The recommended equivalent density assumes deflection;
some minor cracking of walls may occur.
SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE
Water from precipitation, snow melt and surface irrigation of landscaping
frequently flows through relatively permeable backfill placed adjacent to a residence
and collects on the surface of relatively undisturbed soils at the bottom of the
excavation. This can cause wetting of foundation soils, hydrostatic pressures on
below-grade walls, and moist or wet conditions in below-grade areas after
construction. To mitigate these concerns, we recommend provision of a foundation
drain around the residence. The drain should consist of a 4-inch diameter, open joint
or slotted pipe encased in free draining gravel. The drain should lead to a positive
gravity outfall or to a sump pit where water can be removed by pumping. A typical
foundation drain detail is shown on Figure 6. The top 1 to 2 feet of backfill should
consist of a clay soil to limit infiltration.
Ventilation is important to maintain acceptable humidity levels in crawl spaces.
The mechanical systems designer should consider the humidity and temperature of
air, and air flow volumes during design of crawl space ventilation systems. We
believe it is appropriate to install a ventilation system that is controlled by a
humidistat.
TONY ZARLENGO
ZARLENGO RESIDENCE
PROJECT NO. G$05157·120
S:IGS05157.000\12012. Reports\GS05157 120 R1.doc
8
SURFACE DRAINAGE
Surface drainage is critical to the performance of foundations, floor slabs and
concrete flatwork. We recommend the following precautions be observed during
construction and maintained at all times after the residence is completed:
1. The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the residence should
be sloped to drain away from the building in all directions. We
recommend providing a slope of at least 12 inches in the first 10 feet in
landscaped areas around the building.
2. Backfill adjacent to foundation wall exteriors should be moisture
conditioned, placed and compacted as described in the Backfill
section. Increasing the moisture content of backfill soil after placement
often results in settlement of the backfill. Backfill settlement is most
common adjacent to north facing walls.
3. The residence should be provided with gutters and downspouts. Roof
downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all
backfill. Splash blocks and downspout extensions should be provided
at all discharge points. Water from roof and surface runoff should not
be introduced to the foundation drain system.
4. Landscaping should be carefully designed to mm1m1ze irrigation.
Plants used near foundation walls should be limited to those with low
moisture requirements; irrigated grass or other landscaping requiring
comparatively large amounts of irrigation should not be located within
5 feet of the foundation. Sprinklers should be at least 5 feet from
building foundations and directed away from the building. Irrigation
should be limited to the minimum amount sufficient to maintain
vegetation; the application of additional water will increase the
likelihood of slab and foundation movements.
5. Impervious plastic membranes should not be used to cover the ground
surface immediately surrounding the building. These membranes tend
to trap moisture and prevent normal evaporation from occurring.
Geotextile fabrics can be used to control weed growth and allow some
evaporation to occur.
LIMITATIONS
Our exploratory borings were spaced to obtain a reasonably accurate picture
of the subsurface. Variations in the subsurface conditions not indicated by our
TONY ZARLENGO
ZARLENGO RESIDENCE
PROJECT NO. GS05157-120
S:IG$05157.000\120\2. Reports\GS05157 120 R1.doc
9
exploratory borings will occur. We should observe foundation excavations to verify
exposed soils are as anticipated.
This investigation was conducted in a manner consistent with that level of care
and skill ordinarily exercised by geotechnical engineers currently practicing under
similar conditions in the locality of this project. No warranty, express or implied, is
made. If we can be of further service or if you have questions regarding this report,
please call.
CTL I THOMPSON , INC .
~;f.~
Edward R. White, E.l.
Staff Engineer
John
(5 copies sent)
TONY ZARLENGO
ZARLENGO RESIDENCE
PROJECT NO. GS05157-120
S:IGSOS157.0 00\12012. Reports\GS05157 120 R1.doc
10
.. ~' l 00 0.00
i ~~
V:l:
.
• "' I
~
6~1-lO
""' '"'''''' ,.-.,,;,;so
30 30
Project No. GS05157-120
SUMMARY LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS
Fig. 2
HYDROMETER ANALYSIS SIEVE ANALYSIS
25HR 7HR TIME READINGS U_S_ STANDARD SERIES CLEAR SQUARE OPENINGS
DIAMETER OF PARTICLE IN MILLIMETERS
SANDS GRAVEL CLAY (PLASTIC) TO SILT (NON-PLASTIC)
FINE COARSE MEDIUM FINE COARSE COBBLES
Sample of GRAVEL, CLAYEY (GC) GRAVEL 53 % SAND 27 %
From TH-1 AT 19 FEET SILT & CLAY 20% LIQUID LIMIT %
PLASTICITY IN~ % -------
HYDROMETER ANALYSIS SIEVE ANAL YSlS
25 HR. 7 HR. TIME READINGS U.S. STANDARD SERIES CLEAR SQUARE OPENINGS
45 MIN 15 MIN. 60 MIN_ 19 MIN. 4 MIN_ 1 MIN. '200 •1 00 'SO '40 '30 '16 '10 ·a '4 318" 3/4" 1W' 3" 5"6" 8"
100 0
so
! '1 ·_· • •i· I 1'-:J..... I -.. .. I !-_ I
. --~ i I i !
. .
...
1
_:-~) I .. i ' ....
ILl
I ---I I ··-! I I I I. I I --i . -. __ -_:·l--. _:_-_-,-... I
·····
__ , -I I I
I ' I I ! .•• !.J I i ! i I ! -----! i .... I i I
i I l f··_·· l i] : '';· I I I _ _t -'-1 i ' ' ····· I" I I I
' I I I .L ! I : ' ! i I ' li r -' I i ' I I I I
I I I I i : i
!
' I
I I
I I
' I :. ! I '
I ' J ~-+-r I + i I I I i
1
I i I
•
I ' ' I ' I I : ' i I, I i. I I .·. ' I ;
~ 70
:g g: 60
!i w 50 :i w
~ 40
30
20
10
0
0
20
30 fa
z
40 ~
~
50 ~ w
~
60 ~
70
80
90
00
.001 0 002 005 009 .019 037 .074 149 .297 590 1.19 2.0 2.38 4 76 9.52 19_1 36.1 76.2 127 200
152
CLAY (PLASTIC) TO SILT (NON-PLASTIC)
Sample of CLAY, SANDY (CL)
From TH-2 AT g FEET
Mr. Troy Zarlengo
ZARLENGO RESIDENCE
PROJECT NO. GS05157-120
S:\GS05157 .000112016. Calcs\GS051 57-120. Gradation.:ds
0.42
DIAMETER OF PARTICLE IN MILLIMETERS
SANDS
FINE MEDIUM
GRAVEL
COARSE FINE COARSE COBBLES
GRAVEL % SAND 43%
SILT & CLAY 56% LIQUID LIMIT %
PLASTICITY IN~ %
-------
Gradation
Test Results
FIG. 3
z
0
iii z .q:
4
3
2
-1
-2 --
-3
-4
-5
-6 ·-------------
a. -7 X w
;f.
z
0 ·•
iii en w
0:: a. -9
::;;
0
0
ADDITIONAL COMPRESSION UNDER
CONSTANT PRESSURE DUE TO
WETIING
-10L----------------------------------------------------------------J 0.1 1.0
APPLIED PRESSURE • KSF
Sample of SAND, CLA::.,:.:Y;:E~Y"'(S:cC:-_) ________ _
From TH-1 AT 4 FEET
MR. TONY ZARLENGO
ZARLENGO RESIDENCE
PROJECT NO. GS05157-120
5 :IGSOS 157.000112016. Calcs\GS051 57-120. Swell. xls
10 100
DRY UNIT WEIGHT= 95 PCF
MOISTURE CONTENT= 8.0 %
Swell Consolidation
Test Results
FIG.4
-1
-2
-3
-4
-5 ---------------
--8 ------------·------------------------------------
-7 ------------------. -------
-8 ---·---.
-9-----
z -10
0
iii z
<( -11 a. >< w
;ft.
z -12 --------·----
0
iii en w
0::: -13 a. ::;;
0
()
---. ·-·-----------\
ADDITIONAL COMPRESSION UNDER
CONSTANT PRESSURE DUE TO
WETIING
-14L-------------------------------------------------------------------..J
0.1
APPLIED PRESSURE -KSF
Sample of SAND, CLAYEY (SC)
From TH-2 AT 4 FEET
MR. TONY ZARLENGO
ZARLENGO RESIDENCE
PROJECT NO. G$05157-120
S;IG SOS 1 57.000\120\6. Calcs.\GS05157 -120.Swell.xls
1.0 10
DRY UNIT WEIGHT=
MOISTURE CONTENT=
100
-~9=-0:c.__ PCF
_ _'7_'._._7-%
Swell Consolidation
Test Results
FIG. 5
SLOPE
PER
OSHA
SLOPE
PER REPORT
I
\_BACKFILL~ (COMPOSITION AND
COMPACIION PER REPORT)
PROVIDE POLYETHYLENE
SHEETING GLUED TO
FOUNDATION WALL TO
REDUCE MOISTURE
PENETRATION
ENCASE PIPE IN WASHED
CONCRETE AGGREGATE (ASTM
C33, NO. 57 OR NO. 67).
EXTEND GRAVEL TO AT LEAST
1/2 HEIGHT OF FOOTING.
8" MINIMUM
OR BEYOND 1:1
SLOPE FROM BOTIOM
OF FOOTING.
(WHICHEVER IS GREATER)
4-INCH DIAMETER PERFORATED
DRAIN PIPE. THE PIPE SHOULD
BE lAID IN A TRENCH WITH A
SLOPE RANGE BEnNEEN 1/B
INCH AND 1/4 INCH DROP PER
FOOT OF DRAIN.
Project No. GS05157-120
NOTE:
DRAIN SHOULD BE AT LEAST 2 INCHES
BELOW BOTIOM OF FOOTING AT THE
HIGHEST POINIT AND SLOPE DOWNWARD
TO A POSITIVE GRAVIlY OUTLET OR TO
A SUMP WHERE WATER CAN BE
REMOVED BY PUMPING.
STRUCTURALLY SUPPORTED
FLOOR SYSTEM
/ CRAWL SPACE___/'
L----REINFORCING STEEL
PER STRUCTURAL
DRAWINGS.
---FOOTING OR PAD
Qf\TTf\U OF
EXCAVATION
Exterior
Foundation
Wall Drain
Fig. 6
MOISTURE DRY
DEPTH CONTENT DENSITY
LOT (FEET) (%) (PCF)
TH-1 4 8.0 95
TH-1 19 9.1 119
TH-2 4 7.7 90
TH-2 9 13.2 100
ATTERBERG LIMITS
TABLE I
SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TESTING
PROJECT NO. GS05157-120
SWELL TEST RESULTS*
LIQUID PLASTICITY PERCENT
LIMIT INDEX SWELL GRAVEL
(%) (%) (%) (%)
-1.8
53
-5.3
1
PERCENT
SAND
(%)
27
43
*SWELL MEASURED WITH 1000 PSF APPLIED PRESSURE, OR ESTIMATED IN-SITU OVERBURDEN PRESSURE.
NEGATIVE VALUE INDICATES COMPRESSION.
PASSING
NO. 200
SIEVE
(%) DESCRIPTION
SAND, CLAYEY (SC)
20 GRAVEL, CLAYEY (GC)
SAND, CLAYEY (SC)
56 CLAY, SANDY (CL)
Page 1 of 1
COUNTY OF GARFIELD -BUILDING DEPARTMENT
CORRECTION NOTICE
108 8th St., Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado
Phone (970) 945-8212
Job located at _______,/~"---1/___..31"---;=--t~-~=-!T"'~"'""""--'~" __ _
Permit No. VI 7) ____ _2~2_~~-------------------------
I have this day inspected this structure and these
premises and found the following corrections needed:
0 Call for Re-lnspection
0 $50.00 Re-lnspection Fee must be paid prior to Re-lnspection
You are hereby notified that the above correction must be inspected
before covering.
When correction(s) have been made, call for inspection at 970·384·5003.
Date 9-/~;t
Building Inspector
Phone (970) 945-8212
COUNTY OF GARFIELD -BUILDING DEPARTMENT
CORRECTION NOTICE
108 8th St., Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado
Phone (970) 945-8212
Job located at CJ/.3.3 ~ ~ ~
Permit No. /Of/5
I have this day inspected this structure and these
premises and found the following corrections needed:
0 Call for Re-lnspection
0 $50.00 Re-lnspection Fee must be paid prior to Re-lnspection
You are hereby notified that the above correction must be inspected
before covering.
When correction(s) have been made, call for inspection at 970-384-5003.
Date ..s:-d 3 20 ~
Building Inspector ~
Phone (970) 945-8212
No. __________ ~1~09~1~8 __ __ Assessor's Parcel No. 2127-251-00-063
Date 4/29/2008
0133 BUILDING PERMIT CARD
JobAddress ----~L~a~E~re~n~z~L~aun~e~.~Snilt~(~A~n~tl~e~uuO~r~c~h~anroLA~M~D~.~Ipnt~2~9~)------------------------------
Owner Zarlengo Anthony & Chatherine Address 1147 N. 16th St. Silt Phone # 876-5998
Contractor JefferliFonstruction Address 023 LaFrenz In, Silt Phone # 379-3986 Jeff
Setbacks: Front Rear _________ RH LH __________ Zoning ________ _
s/f on crawl space w/open & cov patios & att garage._:.:IN.:..:S~Pc..:E~C~T!..!I"'O:.!.N~S.:__
Soils Test --=--.,.-..---.--,---,....--.-------Weatherproofing-----------------------~~~~~~tion i ~ fz1-_D ogg ~ ~:~~r~;~~~o--ug-h--(S_t_a-te_)__,S=-"""'Cif...,.,.7 .... -"""'o~8,...........,&k~~-,-----
Grout__________________ Electric.iil Final (State) /1:-/$-bB ~
Underground Plum Final ~~~t-'f-Rt> /Checklist Completed? /{;1111.-
Rough Plumbin¥l-....:;-J;.=---fJt7r~----!l11-J-U....---~ Certificate Occupa,nqy # (oJ '-+/...1-, ,, .
Framing ____ -=''-f--l~~U-J-l<-4~---....-----Date i, S.. 'S l..c::E--0 I ·J:,-c/)
Insulation ·-"ZS'-:::. &?. Septic System #_qr+L\::.:.l4ril~O"-=""'=---------------
Roofing ---==---=--,----.,_......,..--~---.-----Date 4-~D8'
Drywall q-..:}. &> ·-tJ f:f ;i{Ck.J, Final 1-;? 1/-CJ $;f}ftt
Gas Piping .:!/.'/0-0ZMIQ Other----------------
NOTES
(continue on back)
INSPECTION WILL NOT BE MADE UNLESS
THIS CARD IS POSTED ON THE JOB
24 HOURS NOTICE REQUIRED FOR INSPECTIONS
BUILDING PERMIT
GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADQ ~
Date Issued.~).f.~l...Zoned Area ............................... Permit No .. .IOO.l .............. ..
AGREEMENT
In consideration of the issuance of this permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with all
laws and regulations related to the zoning, location; construction and erection of the proposed
structure for which this permit is granted, and further agrees that if the above said regulations
are not fully complied with in the zoning, location, erection and construction of the above
described structure, the permit may then be revoked by notice from the County Building
Inspector and IMMEDIATELY BECOME NULL AND VOID .
. ~~Uft~~~N.~~~~~n~~~~~~r-~u~~~Q~A~~~~·
~
Setbacks Front Side Sjde Rear
This Card Must Be Posted So It is Plainly Visible From The Street Until Final Inspection .
. INSPECTION RECORD
Footing 5·.?3-t>,!> )~fop.._ Driveway
Foundation t,_~ </·o ( AJtv., "/t.4.--
Underground Plumbing Insulation 9-z..s--oe yu..-:'
Rough Plumbing ({.;()·0& l1r1 Drywall o/-3e>-CIS q C-D
Chimney & Vent ~ ·IO·f)i<., WI Electric Final (by State Inspector) "'r~
Gas Piping q · ID -05 /()t}' Final ;;J..;;)fot5,Yrvt.
Electric Rough (By State Inspector)I?.•Y,.~,r Septic Final q, ~fo8 iJ1x._
Framing h;-/C7 .. -&1? 0/l-Notes:
(fo include Roo in place and Windows
and Doors installed).
ALL LISTED ITEMS MUST BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE COVERING·
WHETHER INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR, UNDERGROUND OR ABOVE GROUND.
THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE
For Inspections Call384-5003 108 8th Street Glenwood .Springs, Colorado
APPROVED DO NOT DESTROY THIS CARD .
Date/+f.'l-(1 ey'FJamtatrh!..J4..
IF PLACED OUTSIDE -:l~V~R~ITH CLEAR PLASTIC
Parcel Detail Page 1 of 4
Garfield County Assessor/Treasurer
Parcel Detail Information
Assessgr,!Inmsurer Prop_IT!)T SearQ_h I Ass~ssm Subset Que!")' I Assessor Sales Sear~h
Clerk & Recorder ReceptiRn.S<:_!!r~h
Basic Building_Characteristics I Tax Information
Parcel Detail 1 Value Detai_! I Sales Detail I Residential/Commen;iaUmpm_vement Detail
L_and Detail I Photographs
I Tax Area II Account Number II Parcel Number II 2007 Mill Levy I
I 020 II R008140 II 212725100068 II 46.145 I
Owner Name and Mailing Address
!ZARLENGO, ANTHONY A & CATHERINE A
I1147NORTH 16 ST
lsrLr, co 81652
Assessor's Parcel Description
(Not to be used as a legal description)
ISECT,TWN,RNG:25-5-92 DESC: AMENDED
ITRACT 29, AMENDED FINAL PLAT TRS 29
I& 36 & PT OF TRS 28,30 & 37 OF
!ANTLERS ORCHARD DEV. ALSO A TR OF
ILAND CONI 21,701 SqFt (.SAC)+/-AS
IDESC ON AMENDED FINAL PLAT OF THE
!AMENDED TRACTS 29 & 37 OF ANTLERS
!ORCHARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY PLAT NO
II, REC 646777 AND QCD 15641733
IPRE:R200402 PRE:R007935 SPEC ASMT:
ISIL T WATER PROJECT BK:942 PG:594
IBK:0417 PG:0514 BK:0416 PG:0377
IRECPT:742246 RECPT:742245 BK:1942
IPG:383 RECPT:726599 BK:1942 PG:382
IRECPT:726598 BK:1942 PG:381
http://www .garcoact.com/ assessor/Parcel.asp? AccountNurnber=ROO 8140
I
I
I
I
4/8/2008
Parcel Detail Page 2 of4
IRECPT:726597 BK:1596 PG:301
IRECPT:654087 BK:1564 PG:733
IRECPT:64 7398 BK: 1504 PG:231
IRECPT:633871 BK:1504 PG:214
IRECPT:633872 BK:1504 PG:212
IRECPT:633870 BK:1291 PG:578
IRECPT:589431 BK:1268 PG:875 I
IRECPT:584407 BK:1268 PG:872 I
IRECPT:584406 BK:0998 PG:0638 I
Location
Physical Address: llsrL T I
Subdivision: I
Land Acres: 116.717 I
Land Sq Ft: llo
Section II Township II Range I
25 II 5 II 92 I
2007 Property Tax Valuation Information
II Actual Value II Assessed Value I
I Land: II 165,oooll 47,8501
I Improvements: II ol ol
I Total: II 165,oooll 47,8501
Sale Date: 111/30/2008
Sale Price: 11271,000
Basic Building Characteristics
Number of Residential
lo I Buildings:
Number of Commllnd
lo I Buildings:
No Building Records Found
Tax Information
http://www. garcoact. com/ assessor/Parcel.asp? AccountNumber~ R008140 4/8/2008
Parcel Detail
Tax Year Transaction Type II Amount I
2007 Tax Payment: Whole II ($2,208.04)1
2007 Tax Payment: Whole II ($258.00)1
2007 Tax Amount $2,208.041
2007 Tax Amount $258.001
2006 Tax Payment: Whole ($321.00)1
2006 Tax Payment: Whole ($1,948.92)1
2006 I Tax Amount $321.001
2006 Tax Amount $1,948.921
2005 Tax Payment: Whole ($321.00)1
2005 Tax Payment: Whole ($1,948.78)1
2005 Tax Amount $321.001
2005 Tax Amount $1,948.781
2004 Tax Pa~ment: Second Half ($160.50)1
2004 Tax Payment: Second Half ($10.60)1
2004 Tax Payment: First Half ($10.60)1
I 2004 Tax Payment: First Half ($160.50)1
2004 Tax Amount II $321.001
2004 Tax Amount II $21.201
2003 Tax Payment: Whole ($108.00)1
2003 Tax Payment: Whole ($23.56)1
2003 Tax Amount $108.001
2003 Tax Amount $23.561
I 2002 Tax Payment: Whole ($23.28)1
I 2002 Tax Amount II $23.281
I 2001 Tax Payment: Whole II ($23.16)1
I 2001 Tax Amount II $23.161
--·-----·----
Top of Page
A~~e.ssor Database Search Options I Treasmed)atabase Search Options
.Clerk & Recorder Database Search Qp!i.Qns
Garfield County Home Page
Page 3 of4
The Garfield County Assessor and Treasurer's Offices make every effort to collect and maintain
accurate data. However, Good Turns Software and the Garfield County Assessor and Treasurer's Offices
http://www .garcoact.corn/assessor/Parcel.asp? AccountNumber= R008140 4/8/2008