The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutApplication- Permit"Garfield County • Building & Sanitation Department 108 8`h Street, Suite #201 Glenwood Springs, Co. 81601 Office- 945-8212 Inspection Line- 384-5003 Job Address t'INo 1 Nature of Work Building Perini Use of Building NO. q 1D (c) 1 rte— Pc)4t Owner J , 1 . ` l Lrvm Contractor _ '--%4 op Amount of Perm Vir r to f a� --(4 Ge DateyY Clerk r t Permit No: GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION 108 8n Street, Suite 201, Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: 970-945-8212 / Fax: 970-384-3470 / lnspection Line: 970-384-5003 RkC 1U ParceUSehedule No: ,93q3 - 0 /- c34f I AGREEMENT PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO THE APPLICANT AS OWNER, CONTRACTOR AND/OR THE AGENT OF THE CONTRACTOR OR OWNER TO CONSTRUCT THE STRUCTURE AS DETAILED ON PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SUBMITTED TO AND REVIEWED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. IN CONSIDERATION OF THE ISSSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT, THE SIGNER. HEREBY AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL BUILDING CODES AND LAND USE REGULATIONS ADOPTED BY GARFIELD COUNTY PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GIVEN IN 3021201 CRS AS AMENDED. THE SIGNER FURTHER AGREES THAT IF THE ABOVE SAID ORDINANCES ARE NOT FULLY COMPILED WITH IN THE LCOATION, ERECTION, CONSTRUCTION, AND USE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED STRUCTURE, THE PERMIT MAY BE REVOKED BY NOTICE FROM THE COUNTY AND THAT TEN AND THERE IT SHALL BECOME NULL AND VOID. THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMT BASED UPON PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA SHALL NOT PREVENT THE BUILDING OFFICIAL FROM THEREAFTER REQUIRING THE CORRECTION OF ERRORS IN SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA OR FROM PREVENTING BUILDING OPERATION BEING CARRIED ON THEREUNDER WHEN IN VIOLATION OF THS CODE OR ANY OTHER ORDINANCE OR REGULATION OF THIS JURISDICTION. THE REVIEW OF SUBMITTED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND INSPECTIONS CONDUCTED THEREAFTER DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ACCEPTANCE OF ANY RESPONSIBILITIES OR LIABLITIES BY GARFIEID COUNTY FOR ERRORS, OMISSIONS OR DISCREPENCIES. THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THESE ITEMS AND IMPLEMENTATION DURING CONSTRUCTION RESTS SPECIFICIALLY WITH THE ARTICTECr, DESIGNER, BUILDER, AND OWNER. COMMENTS ARE INTENDED TO BE CONSERVATIVE AND IN SUPPORT OF THE OWNERS INTEREST. Garfom.003 HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT 1 HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE AGREEMENT ABOVE (INITIAL): //I 1 11nL r 1.6� Job Address: �->I I/ Tdge KI Lin f r• -bar, 1 Aim G levy C 1 Lot No: Block No: Subd. / Exemption: £4-ta A5Pan Giem ub,1ivile-+ A 2r: IIm Ds zdd Address 244 } CI»,n I I Plan1V 1 3 a17L °V4l �JbSGJ Wk Ph: 3 Co�!tracta : 1 laid Burk idler Address��. ,00111 ve cArty7naule, co al(123 Ph: °D70 01,3 Lic. No. 1025 4 ArehlStc_t/Engineer: ,JICe' abn�in 11 ..l Address: 1 3 E Sid Sf t2:1 -ho Sly CO Sl Pb: d� MOO • 410 Lic. No. 203 4 ci O 5 ZZ "3q. Ft. of Building: C 394 J Sq. F, .. of�Lot:h Height: 241.91 • No. of Floors: 3 6 Use of Building: r yrgle famik Pg�t4ev+a. int cA tJ-[ ir-o. . uta/ olre a aQ 7 Describe Work: U I rat Cue"61/77 Inpyne c0n4 TL,G'F'Tcsc 8 Class of Work: '< New o Alteration o Remove ❑ Addition ❑ Move 9 10 Garage: o Single `X Double Carport: o Single o Double o Driveway Permit o On -Site Sewa&ge Disposal `It( Site Plan Wil. (Septic) 11/s0. 11 Valuation of Work: $ a 2 5 'V r Adjusted Valuations: $ �Q/� Q a co V�la$�w�l�r9- 12 __ ,._ cfet4t erns ead ' J � • V 401-1,47_CIOSIY /vra t i-40 /o 40D� NOTICE lab A SEPARATE ELECTRICAL PERMIT IS REQUIRED AND MUST BE ISSUED BY THE STATE OF COLORADO. THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 180 DAYS, OR, IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 180 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK I5 COMMENCED. 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT 1 HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS E THS TYPE OF WORK TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. APPLICATION PROVISIONS OFD KNOW LAWS GOVERNINGBE COMPLETED WITHIN WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULATING CONSTRUCTION OR THE PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTION. etto.prIV12. A(,E}tT �� ;'��„ r• 2^7/„ 11 •11047^ g 2 ' 7C 735 Total Fee: Dated Permit Issued: 39 /_ 9 4236/3 OCnC Group: Const.(IType: i,' 3 f� ( -. t"A Zoning: Setbacks: Manu. Home: 1SDS No. & Fee: jam I///! I .n161_-- rr Ir+�i� ER t�� . r/ay ...kelp 11 a p e 4//ar�1�� EP r -')/)�lj� APPRO AL/DATE , Pt ,-SI/ 1 T I AGREEMENT PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO THE APPLICANT AS OWNER, CONTRACTOR AND/OR THE AGENT OF THE CONTRACTOR OR OWNER TO CONSTRUCT THE STRUCTURE AS DETAILED ON PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SUBMITTED TO AND REVIEWED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. IN CONSIDERATION OF THE ISSSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT, THE SIGNER. HEREBY AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL BUILDING CODES AND LAND USE REGULATIONS ADOPTED BY GARFIELD COUNTY PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GIVEN IN 3021201 CRS AS AMENDED. THE SIGNER FURTHER AGREES THAT IF THE ABOVE SAID ORDINANCES ARE NOT FULLY COMPILED WITH IN THE LCOATION, ERECTION, CONSTRUCTION, AND USE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED STRUCTURE, THE PERMIT MAY BE REVOKED BY NOTICE FROM THE COUNTY AND THAT TEN AND THERE IT SHALL BECOME NULL AND VOID. THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMT BASED UPON PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA SHALL NOT PREVENT THE BUILDING OFFICIAL FROM THEREAFTER REQUIRING THE CORRECTION OF ERRORS IN SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA OR FROM PREVENTING BUILDING OPERATION BEING CARRIED ON THEREUNDER WHEN IN VIOLATION OF THS CODE OR ANY OTHER ORDINANCE OR REGULATION OF THIS JURISDICTION. THE REVIEW OF SUBMITTED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND INSPECTIONS CONDUCTED THEREAFTER DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ACCEPTANCE OF ANY RESPONSIBILITIES OR LIABLITIES BY GARFIEID COUNTY FOR ERRORS, OMISSIONS OR DISCREPENCIES. THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THESE ITEMS AND IMPLEMENTATION DURING CONSTRUCTION RESTS SPECIFICIALLY WITH THE ARTICTECr, DESIGNER, BUILDER, AND OWNER. COMMENTS ARE INTENDED TO BE CONSERVATIVE AND IN SUPPORT OF THE OWNERS INTEREST. Garfom.003 HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT 1 HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE AGREEMENT ABOVE (INITIAL): //I 1 11nL r 1.6� VALUATION/FEE DETERMINATION borseti Applicant Subdivision AS &!e14 c' 1i A 1 Address rt* Lot/Block Le IR Date S�(i•O Contracto )_ n 3 rKkt`&-Cf Finished (Livable Area): Main n 795 Up VA Upper Lower /661 Other Total Square Feet 415 S (0 : 49 Valuation Basement: Unfinished Conversion of Unfinished to Finished Plan Check Fee for Conversion Valuation Garage: Crawl Space: Valuation 7750 1 5 Valuation 7Sic) ,i 7 Decks/Patios: Covered PI X e-cf Valuation Open 06 x Valuation Total Valuation 3/(643g/ «,qso 70s, 2o go /Di S'36 3‘19,19z, St in it fence ?gas/ QoSW +HO VALUATION/FEE DETERMINATION bOrSel Applicant AddressKIM." Date 5: i The following items are required by Garfield County for a final inspection: 1. A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector 2. Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department posted where readily visible from access road; 3. A finished roof, a lockable house, complete exterior siding, exterior doors and windows installed, a complete kitchen with cabinets, a sink with hot & cold running water, non- absorbent kitchen floor coverings, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove and refrigerator, all necessary plumbing; 4. A complete bathroom, with washbowl, tub or shower, toilet stool, hot and cold running water, non-absorbent floors and walls finished and a privacy door; 5. All steps outside or inside over three (3) steps must have handrails, guard rails on balconies or decks over 30" high constructed to all 1997 UBC requirements; 6. Outside grading done to where water will detour away from the building; 7. Exceptions to the outside steps, decks and grading may be made upon the demonstration of extenuating circumstances, i.e. weather, but a Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until all the required items are completed and a final inspection made. A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. ****CANNOTOCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (C.O.) IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATING PREMISE UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET. I understand and agree to abide by the above conditions for occupanc use andrthe issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the dwelling under building permit# 13l� 4./2710} 5 azure owr S Date Q4 BpcontO82002 FROM :RFWSD FAX NO. :9709479220 Jun. 02 2005 03:32PM P1 ROARING FORK WATER & SANITATION DISTRICT P. O. Box 1002 • Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 Tel 0: 970-945-2144 Fax 0: 970-947-9220 FACSIMILE Date: 6/9- /te Distribution: &rhea 3 Radii Fax: 32/- gYn From Re: 46 lvf r/8 Discussion(s): %, get 'is l i Stet fetid Jpb4/17D mithfitti RECEIVED JUN 0 2 2005 GARFIELD COur. BUILDING & PLANNING Page of / f GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING 970-945-8212 MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS for SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING CONSTRUCTION including NEW CONSTRUCTION ADDITIONS ALTERATIONS and MOVED BUILDINGS In order to understand the scope of the work intended under a permit application and expedite the issuance of a permit it is important that complete information be provided. Adequate and complete information will prevent delays in the plan review process. Reviewing a plan and the discovery that required information has not been provided by the applicant may result in the delay of the permit issuance and in proceeding with building construction. The owner or contractor may be required to provide this information before the plan review may proceed. This causes delays because other plans that are in line for review may be given attention before the new information may be reviewed after it has been provided to the Building Department. Please review this document to determine if you have enough information to design your project and provide adequate information to facilitate a plan review. If you do not, it may be helpful to obtain a book titled "Dwelling Construction under the Uniform Building Code". This book is available to you through this department at our cost. Also, please consider using a design professional for assistance in your design and a construction professional for construction of your project. To provide for a more understandable plan in order to determine compliance with the building, plumbing and mechanical codes, applicants are requested to review the following checklist prior to and during design. Applicants are required to indicate appropriately and to submit the completed checklist at time of application for a permit. 1 Plans to be included for a Building Permit, must be on drafting paper at least 18'x24" and drawn to scale. \, Plans must include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations all sides with decks, balcony, steps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the finish grade line. A section showing in detail, from the bottom of the footing to the top of the roof, including re -bar, anchor bolts, pressure treated plates, floor joists, wall studs and spacing, insulation, sheeting, house -rap, (which is required), siding or any approved building material. V A window schedule. A door schedule. A floor framing plan, a roof framing plan, roof must be designed to withstand a 40 pound per square foot up to 7,000 feet in elevation, an 80 M.P.H. windshear, wind exposure B, windload of 15 pounds per square foot, and a 36 inch frost depth. All sheets to be identified by number and indexed. All of the above requirements must be met or your plans will be returned. f All plans submitted must be incompliance with the 1997 UBC, UMC and 1997 UPC. 1. Is a site plan included that identifies the location of the proposed structure or addition and distances to the property lines from each corner of the proposed structure(s) prepared by a licensed surveyor and has the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing? Properties with slopes of 30% or greater must be shown on the site plan. NOTE: 106.3.1 (7.) Any site plan for the placement of any portion of a structure within 50 ft. of a property line and not within a previously surveyed building envelope on a subdivision final plat shall be prepared by a licensed surveyor and have the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing. Any structure to be built within a building envelope of a lot shown on a recorded subdivision plat, shall include a copy of the building envelope as it is shown on the final plat with the proposed structure located within the envelope. Yes X 2. Does the site plan also include any other buildings on the property, setback easements and utility easements? Please refer to Section 5.05.03 in the Garfield County Zoning Resolution if the property you are applying for a building permit on is located on a corner lot. Special setbacks do apply. Yes 1}0 3. Does the site plan include when applicable the location of the I.S.D.S. (Individual 2 r f Sewage Disposal System) and the distances to the property lines, wells (on subject property and adjacent properties), streams or water courses? Yes y 4. Does the site plan indicate the location and direction of the County or private road accessing the property? Yes X 5. Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all reinforcing steel in accordance with the uniform building code or per stamped engineered design? Yes x 6. Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl spaces and the clearances required between wood and earth? Yes K 7. Do the plans indicate the size and location of ventilation openings for the attic, roof joist space's and soffits? Yes 8. Do the plans include design loads as required by Garfield County for roof snow loads, (a minimum of 40 pounds per square foot up to & including 7,000 feet above sea level), floor loads and wind loads? Yes `1 9. Does the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor, and roof construction? Yes *ix 10. Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists, wall studs, ceiling joists, roof rafters or joists or trusses? Yes Y- 11. Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method of positive connection of all columns and beams? Yes 12. Does the plan indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the highest point of the building or addition measured at mid span between the ridge and the eave down to existing (undisturbed) grade contours? Yes 13. Does the plan include any stove or zero clearance fireplace planned for installation 3 If t including make and model and Colorado Phase II certifications or phase II EPA certification? Yes x No 14. Does the plan include a masonry fireplace including a fireplace section indicating design to comply with the Uniform Building Code Chapter 37? Yes No Y 15. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that egress/rescue windows from sleeping rooms and/or basements comply with the requirements of the Uniform Building Code? YesNo 16. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that windows provide natural light and ventilation for all habitable rooms? Yes 1 No 17. Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass doors, glazing immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as a walking surface; sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub enclosures and specify safety glazing for these areas? Yes No 18. Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces, boilers and water heaters ingycated on the plan? Yes No 19. Do you understand that if you are building on a parcel of land created by the exemption process or the subdivision process, are building plans in compliance with all plat notes and/or covenants? Yes y No 20. Do you understand that if you belong to a homeowners association, it is your responsibility to obtain written permission from the association, if required by that association, prior to submitting an application for a building permit? If you do not have written permission from the association, do you understand that the plan check fee will not be refunded should the architectural committee deny or reject your building plans? Yes No 21. Will this be the only residential structure on the parcel? Yes 5' No If no - Explain: 4 22. Have two (2) complete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the application? Yes ' 23. Do you understand that the minimum dimensions a home can be on a lot is 20ft.wide and 20ft. long? Yes v No 24. Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other construction code requirements? Yes x No 25. Do your plans comply with all zoning rules and regulations in the County related to your properties zone district? Yes ' No 26. Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a final inspection by the Garfield County Building Department? Yes k No 27. Do you understand that approval for design and/or construction changes are required prior to the application of these changes? Yes X No 28. Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a 'Plan Review" fee from you at the time of application submittal and that you will be required to pay the "Permit Fee" as well as any "Road Impact" or "Septic System" fees required, at the time you pick up your building permit? Yes Y No 29. Are you aware that twenty-four (24) hour notice is required for all inspections? Inspections will be made from Battlement Mesa to West Glenwood in the mornings and from Glenwood Springs to Carbondale in the afternoons. All inspections must be called in by 3:30 p.m. the day before. Failure to give twenty-four (24) hour notice for inspections will delay your inspection one (1) day. Inspections are to be called in to 384-5003. Yes Y No 30. Are you aware that requesting inspections on work that is not ready or not accessible will result in a $47.00 re-inpsection fee? Yes x No 31. Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the Uniform Building Code including approval on a final inspection prior to receiving a 5 1 Certificate o Occupancy and occupancy of the building? Yes No 32. Are you aware that the Permit Application must be signed by the Owner or a written authority be given for an Agent and that the party responsible for the project must comply with the Uniform Building Code? Yes = No 33. Are you aware that prior to submittal of a building permit application you are required to show proof of a driveway access permit or obtain a statement from the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department stating one is not necessary? You can contact the Road & Bridge Department at 625-8601. Yes No_ 34. Do you understand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed Electrician and Plumber to perform installations and hookups, unless you as the homeowner are performing the work? The license number of the person performing the work will b required at time of applicable inspection. Yes No 35. Are you aware, that on the front of the Building Permit Application you will need to fill in the Parcel/Schedule Number for the lot you are applying for this permit on prior to submittal of a building permit application? Your attention in this is appreciated. Yes No I hereby acknowledge that I have read, understand and answered these questions to the best of my ability. Signature of Owner Phone: '170 (025 052,0 (days); °,"1Qs25 2134_(evenings) Project Name: Don2e 1012t-,ide✓lte, cechtr Date q-/ 27/3* Address: ct Aes 7'GD Vi 4t sk cr LA14 IGWV1nn Address: � 4 � Notes: If you have answered "No" on any of the questions, you may be required to provide this 6 APR -28-2004 08:448 FROM:JEFF JOHNSON RRCHITE 625 0581 FROM: FR I RMOUNT PRUE ND. : 9729911164 F ' ' MOUNT CAPITAL GROUP TO:3843470 P:2/2 Apr. 28 2004 02:34AM P2 5331 Spring Valley Rd. Dallas, Tama 75234 972-991-9655 972-991-1164 fax April 28. 2004 Garfield County Planning Department 1, Timothy J. Dorsey, hereby authorize Mr. Jeff Johnson to act as my agent and representative for architectural and permitting decision for Lot E48 in Aspen Glen. If you have any questions, please feel free to give m a call or please send all correspondence to Timothy J. Dorsey, 2404 Crown Knoll, Plano, Texas 75093. Very truly yo Timothy J. Dorsey. Ir. President APR -06-2004 IED B8:80AM ID:JEFF JOHNSON ARCHITECTURAL. PA E:2 F1 : PRE POB 1907 81602 April 23, 2004 Re: Aspen Glen Lot E-48 Mr. Tim Dorsey 2404 Crown Knoll Lane Plano, TX. 75093 Dear Mr. Dorsey, FAX N0. : 14 ro9288428 Apr. 25 2004 87:04Pr1 P2 Your architect Jeff Johnson made a presentation of plans for your home to be constructed on Lot E-48 to the Design Review Committee on the 15th of April. Receipt on this date of your Builders Completion deposit, CRAF fres, and tap fee for the Roaring Fork Water and Sanitation District is hereby acknowledged. Thank you. Note is made that Mr. Johnson recalculated the gross square footage of your home and that the CRAF fee correctly totals 52157.60, the amount of your check number 1823. At this time your plea are approved for submission to Garfield County. The revised landscape plan requested of Mr. Johnson on the 15th was provided today, and it must still be reviewed and approved by Design Review. Your builders completion deposit is held in trust for you by the Homeowners Association until your home and landscape is completed in accordance with your approved plans. It is released to you upon the on-site final review by the Design Review Committee when your home is completed and all matters regarding variations from approved plans or the Design Guidelines have been addressed. Thrce inspections need to occur during construction of your home by the Design Review Committee. Those will ultimately be your responsibility and bear upon release of the Builders Completion Deposit. Please contact the DRC Administrator at (970) 963- 4536 extension 234, upon conviction of the foundation and dry -in phases of construction and for your final on-site review by the DRC. Details of these procedures are contained in the Design Review application packet, provided to Mr. Johnson. Failure to tali for any of these inspections wW result in 51000 per violation held by the Homeowners Association from the return of your Builder's Completion Deposit. All inspections are performed by the Committee the 1st and 3rd Thursday of each month. It will be necessary for your builder to arrange reviews in accordance with the DRC's scheduled sessions. 1 have worked with Mr. Burkholder on another residence here in Aspen Glen, and I am certain the construction is in good hands. Please call me with any questions you may oPP_X._7ppp q iu ac.! 751PM Tfl, TPrr Tf1HNCf1N OPrWTTR TI IPfI PAGE : 2 PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST Applicant lf,31 r Date 5 -no el Building Planning/Zoning ✓Engineered Foundation Property Line Setbacks /j.4 Driveway Permit 30ft Stream Setbacks Surveyed Site Plan Flood Plain Ai, #1 Septic Permit and Setbacks Building Height ..Grade/Topography 30% Zoning Sign -off J jttach Residential Plan Review List Road Impact Fees ./ Minimum Application Questionnaire ,/IIOA/DRC Approval , Subdivision Plat Notes Giade/Topography 40% 144 Fire Department Review Planning Issues , /Valuation Determination/Fees Subdivision Plat Notes ed Line Plans/Stamps/Sticker Attach Conditions application Signed L/�Plan Reviewer To Sign Application Parcel/Schedule No. /di 40# Snowload Letter- Manf. Hms. GENERAL NOTES: / C pp, y Ep a ° d '" b N ro C -0 a ED m m rK E-1 v) 1. J DATE OF SURVEY WAS FEBRUARY 9, 2004. Q E.,..) U a g�5 w xW co0 b.wyww en ex, O..) E: % Phi lL • q°0ZQ 3! yarl w E ▪ wU g o a 1 o'• UU oiE, wA{) co 'O� � 0� w F. x ., m t. 0 wog�o • I• X43OU Ex, Li U wq w° itl ril • ctHP IZfW,wo• c• c ca w c4 0e U• Wd a ry of W ceLQ v cOlzi E. ti°U W Fr cC>, °UU Edge of Asphalt SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT N 0 LEV 0 z 9 V C. 0 w V h M Co 6.1C O iO h Lr) OPi Op 10.1 AO h'C'4) ry OaJUU ,--1 0 0 3 m / 6019 M P p e cn coc Obb . n •--r+�j A A A 11q 04 II x Q a Wu EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY Telephone Pedestal Cable Pedestal Water Valve 1:1 o i V!a CC ..:13. F E ^ o 1416 i -a bc I 1-1-.w U Faal OA^ o'- LIW CC No n co Job Address Ob31 Assessor's Parcel No2393' �-O( O4 ' BUILDINIkeERAIT CARD Owner —137)Th Contractor lLVeki a . Date 5 -at -i --c9 Addresq94Tw'rn'.'n Einr0-ra 'Alone Aria -choSS Add ressbl44(Sn) us C. Phone RePerr`"erso Set cks:Froern�ntp•��f Rea® RH LH Zoning C r / �`� rIN—SPECTIONS CPW Soils Testmop?� �n.�� Footing I. -/C cc; /ix t-» Foundation '-I Grout Underground Plumbing-zv-7-177¢ Rough Plumbing 'p- Framing 12- 2 -anA - Insulation /-1-05-711,-- Roofing -1-b5'?MLRoofing Drywall k 1 171' ee'l7A' Gas Piping 4-7 - 3.' 0174- kGn2, /M v per,,, 1- l z-zsig_ �. if/ A ce NOTES Weatherproofing Mechanical Electrical Rough (State) Electrical Final State) Final o - hecklist Completed? Certificate Occupancy # Date Septic System # Date Final Other Anitm cum T , 4.+tr Casa /Z47 -G (continue on back) INSPECTION WILL NOT BE MADE UNLESS THIS CARD IS POSTED ON THE JOB 24 HOURS NOTICE REQUIRED FOR INSPECTIONS BUILDING PERMIT GAR/FFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO Date Issued .1t' Zoned Ares Permit No l I AXA AGREEMENT In consideration of the issuance of this permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with all laws and regulations related to the zoning, location; construction and erection of the proposed structure for which this permit is grant4 and further agrees that if the above said regulations are not fully complied with in the zoning, location, erection and construction of the above described structure, the permit may then be revoked by notice from the County Building Inspector d IMMEDIATELY BECOME NULL AND VOID. Add or Legal Descnp', uaa •1,..r.. . I This Card Must Be Posted So It is Plainly Visible From The Street Until Final Inspection. INSPECTION RECORD Footing (C- /0.OLfV*f / OIPPva✓ i1 -24-0W % Foundation (0-I 8-G /7}goindn 1- 7 -or -y* - Underground Plumbing Insulation et' /-7 Rough Plumbing g - yo- 0,17721— - Drywall f_I g -OS - rei Chimney & Vent Electric Final (by State Inspector) 44,i,� Gas Piping ,7-,50 -0c&'t Final 6,..../ _ps/M' l Electric Rough (By State lospector0 """"y c rlw Septic Final Framing t _t_py (To include Roof in place rod Windows and Doors installed). Notes: *I (22/ /4/2. 4/ is-eth'n 1-11-G' r* (gab vat.. 2- / 6 -ctr/ q -- ALL LISTED ITEMS MUST BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE COVERING - WHETHER INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR, UNDERGROUND OR ABOVE GROUND. THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE 09 SthStreet County Courthouse Glenwood Springs, Colorado. D00 NOT DESTROY THIS CARD y CED OUTSIDE - OV t WITH CLEAR PLASTIC - dw,cc ..TG __.., 51E02 EA.-. NO. 19709236'42o nor. 25 2004 07:0EPM P1 ur ng me oui long penod. My extension is 234, at 970- 9VJ-4-JJ V. Please Keep in mutd that a copy of your approved plans are kept on file for periodic review by the Design Review Committee to assure compliance with your approved plans. My anticipated changes from your appmved plans must be submitted to, reviewed by and receive approval from the Design Review Committee prior to making any changes. Sincerely, Aspen Glen Design Review Committee Keith Edquist, Administrator cc: DRC files Jeff Johnson, via facsimile Todd Burkholder, via facsimile Mil= 4 CTLITHOMPSON w t 0 IR Pt OR' lb Y. E../. s: SOILS AND FOUNDATION INVESTIGATION DORSEY RESIDENCE LOT E48, ASPEN GLEN GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO Prepared For: MR. TIM DORSEY c/o Jeff Johnson Architects 136 East Third Street Rifle, CO 81650 Attention: Mr. Jeff Johnson Job No. GS -4155 March 1, 2004 234 Center Drive I Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Telephone: 970-945-2809 Fax: 970-945-7411 TABLE OF CONTENTS SCOPE 1 SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS 1 SITE CONDITIONS 2 PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION 2 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 3 SITE EARTHWORK 3 FOUNDATION 5 FLOOR SYSTEM AND SLABS -ON -GRADE 6 BELOW -GRADE CONSTRUCTION 7 SURFACE DRAINAGE 8 LIMITATIONS 9 FIGURE 1 - APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIGURE 2 - SUMMARY LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIGURE 3 - GRADATION TEST RESULTS FIGURE 4 - EXTERIOR FOUNDATION WALL DRAIN TABLE I - SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS MR TIM DORSEY LOT E48, ASPEN GLEN CTL/T JOB NO. GS.4155 SCOPE This report presents the results of our soils and foundation investigation for the proposed Dorsey Residence on Lot E48, Aspen Glen in Garfield County, Colorado. We conducted this investigation to evaluate subsurface conditions at the site and provide foundation recommendations for the proposed construction. Our report was prepared from data developed during exploratory drilling at the site, engineering analysis and our experience with similar conditions. This report includes a description of the subsurface conditions encountered in exploratory borings, and presents our recommendations for design criteria forthe recommended foundation and floor system, and geotechnical and construction criteria for details influenced by the subsoils. Recommendations contained in this report were developed based on our understanding of the planned construction. If plans differ significantly from the descriptions contained in the report, we should be informed so that we can check that our recommendations and design criteria are appropriate. A summary of our conclusions is presented below. SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS 1. Subsurface conditions encountered in our exploratory borings drilled at the site consisted of nil and 6 inches of sandy clay "topsoil" underlain by silty to sandy gravel with cobbles to the total explored depth of 19 feet below existing ground surface. Practical solid -stem auger refusal occurred on cobbles at several depths in our exploratory borings. Free ground water was not observed in the exploratory borings at the time of drilling. Exploratory borings were backfilled immediately after drilling operations were completed. 2. We recommend constructing the Dorsey Residence on footing foundations supported by the undisturbed, gravel soil. Design and construction criteria for footings are presented in the report. 3. We judge potential differential movement of slabs -on -grade supported by the undisturbed, gravel soil will be low. Additional discussion is in the report. MR. TIM DORSEY LOT E48. ASPEN GLEN CTLIT JOB NO. GS -4155 4. Surface drainage should be designed to provide for rapid removal of surface water away from the residence. SITE CONDITIONS Aspen Glen is located southwest of State Highway 82, about 2 miles northwest of the Town of Carbondale in Garfield County, Colorado. Lot E48 is northwest of the intersection of Diamond A Ranch Road and King Fisher. Ground surface on most of the lot slopes gently down to the west at grades of less than 5 percent. Steep slopes at the southwest side of the lot drop 5 to 15 vertical feet down to Diamond A Ranch Road. Approximately 12 inches of snow covered the ground surface at the time of our investigation. Vegetation on the lot appeared to consist of sparse grass and weeds. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION We understand the proposed single-family residence will be a two-story, wood -frame building with a walkout basement and an attached garage. Crawl spaces will be below part of the building. Floors in the basement and garage will be slabs -on -grade. Foundation loads are expected to vary between 1,000 and 3,000 pounds per lineal foot of foundation wall with maximum interior column loads of 30 kips. Maximum foundation excavation depths will likely be on the order of 9 feet. Completed wall backfill depth may be slightly more than excavation depth as final grades are adjusted for drainage. If construction will differ significantly from the descriptions above, we should be informed so that we can adjust our recommendations and design criteria, if necessary. MR. TIM DORSEY LOT E48. ASPEN GLEN CTLIT JOB NO. GS -4155 2 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS We investigated subsurface conditions at the site by drilling two exploratory borings (TH-1 and TH-2) at the approximate locations shown on Figure 1. Exploratory drilling operations were directed by our laboratory/field manager who logged subsurface conditions exposed in the borings and obtained samples of the soils. Graphic logs of the soils encountered in our exploratory borings are shown on Figure 2. Subsurface conditions encountered in our exploratory borings drilled at the site consisted of nil and 6 inches of sandy clay "topsoil" underlain by silty to sandy gravel and cobbles to the maximum explored depth of 19 feet. Results of field penetration test results and observations during drilling operations indicated the gravel was dense to very dense. Practical solid -stem auger refusal occurred on cobbles at several depths in our exploratory borings. Free ground water was not observed in the exploratory borings at the time of drilling. Exploratory borings were backfilled immediately after drilling operations were completed. Two samples of the native soils tested contained 6 and 8 percent silt and clay size particles (passing the No. 200 sieve). Gradation test results from one sample are shown on Figure 3. Results of laboratory testing are summarized on Table I. SITE EARTHWORK Grading plans were not provided to us. We expect that fill at the site will be less than 2 feet thick. Areas which will receive fill should be stripped of vegetation, organic soils and debris. The on-site soils free of organic matter, debris and rocks larger than 6 inches in diameter can be used as fill. A 4 -inch thick layer of densely compacted, CDOT Class 6 aggregate base course or similar soil can be used as a leveling course below footings and interior floor slabs, if necessary. A sample of the MR. TIM DORSEY LOT E48, ASPEN GLEN CTL/T JOB NO. GS -4165 3 desired import fill soil should be submitted to our office for approval, prior to hauling to the site. Fill should be placed in loose lifts of 10 inches thick or less and moisture conditioned to within 2 percent of optimum moisture content. Fill placed outside the building footprint should be compacted to at least 95 percent of standard Proctor (ASTM D 698) maximum dry density. Structural fill below interior floor slabs and granular soil used as a leveling course should be compacted to at least 98 percent of ASTM D 698 maximum dry density. Moisture content and density of fill and structural fill should be checked by a representative of our firm during placement. We anticipate excavations for the building foundation and utilities can be accomplished using conventional, heavy-duty excavation equipment. Excavation sides will need to be sloped or braced to meet local, state and federal safety regulations. We believe the native gravel will classify as a Type C soil based on OSHA standards governing excavations. Temporary slopes deeper than 5 feet should be no steeper than 1.5 to 1 (horizontal to vertical) in Type C soils. Contractors should identify the soils encountered in the excavations and refer to OSHA standards to determine appropriate slopes. Soils removed from the excavation should not be stockpiled at the edge of the excavation. Excavated soils should be placed at a distance from the top of the excavation equal to at least the depth of the excavation. Free ground water was not found in the exploratory borings at the time of drilling operations. We do not anticipate excavations for foundations or utilities will penetrate ground water, however, excavations should be sloped to a gravity discharge or to a temporary sump where water can be removed by pumping. The ground surrounding the excavations should be sloped as much as practical to direct runoff away from the excavations. MR. TIM DORSEY LOT E48. ASPEN GLEN CTLJT JOB NO. GS -4155 4 FOUNDATION We recommend constructing the Dorsey Residence on footing foundations supported by the undisturbed, gravel soil. The completed foundation excavation should be inspected by a representative of our firm, prior to placing forms, to confirm that the native gravel is exposed and suitable for support of the designed footings. We anticipate maximum total settlements of footing foundations supported on the native gravel will be Tess than 1 inch with differential settlement of about 1/2 total settlement. Recommended design and construction criteria for footings are presented below. 1. Footing foundations should be supported by the undisturbed, gravel soil. Soils loosened during excavation or the forming process for the footings should be removed or the soils can be re -compacted prior to placing concrete. If needed, a maximum 4 inch thick layer of compacted CDOT Class 6 aggregate base course or similar soil can be placed below footings as a leveling course. 2. Footings supported by the native gravels can be designed for a maximum allowable soil bearing pressure of 5,000 psf. 3. Continuous wall footings should have a minimum width of at least 16 inches. Foundations for isolated columns should have minimum dimensions of 24 inches by 24 inches. Larger sizes may be required, depending upon foundation loads. 4. Grade beams and foundation walls should be well reinforced, top and bottom, to span undisclosed loose or soft soil pockets. We recommend reinforcement sufficient to span an unsupported distance of at least 10 feet. Reinforcement should be designed by a qualified structural engineer. 5. The soils beneath exterior footings should be protected from freezing. We recommend the bottom of footings be constructed at a depth of at least 36 inches below finished exterior grades for frost protection. MR. TIM DORSEY LOT E48, ASPEN GLEN CTLJT JOB NO. GS -4155 5 FLOOR SYSTEM AND SLABS -ON -GRADE Floors in garage and basement areas will be slabs -on -grade. Based on our laboratory test data and our experience, we judge slab -on -grade construction can be supported by the undisturbed, gravel soil with low risk of differential movement and associated damage. Structural fill placed to attain subgrade elevations for the garage floor slab and exterior concrete flatwork should be in accordance with the recommendations outlined in the SITE EARTHWORK section. A leveling course consisting of a 4 -inch thick layer of densely compacted, CDOT Class 6 aggregate base course or similar soil can be used below floor slabs, if necessary. The most positive method to mitigate floor movement is the construction of a structural floor with an air space between the floor and the subgrade soils. The structural floor is supported by the foundation system and an excellent choice from a geotechnical standpoint. There are design and construction issues associated with structurally supported floors, such as ventilation and increased lateral loads, which must be considered. We recommend the following precautions for slab -on -grade construction at this site. 1. Slabs should be separated from exterior walls and interior bearing members with slip joints which allow free vertical movement of the slabs. 2. Underslab plumbing should be pressure tested for leaks before the slabs are constructed. Plumbing and utilities which pass through slabs should be isolated from the slabs with sleeves and provided with flexible couplings to slab supported appliances. 3. Exterior patio and porch slabs should be isolated from the residence. These slabs should be well -reinforced to function as independent units. 4. Frequent control joints should be provided, in accordance with American Concrete Institute (ACI) recommendations, to reduce MR. TIM DORSEY LOT E48, ASPEN GLEN CTL/T JOB NO. GS -4155 6 problems associated with shrinkage and curling. Our experience indicates panels which are approximately square generally perform better than rectangular areas. BELOW -GRADE CONSTRUCTION Foundation walls which extend below -grade should be designed for lateral earth pressures where backfill is not present to about the same extent on both sides of the wall. Many factors affect the values of the design lateral earth pressure. These factors include, but are not limited to, the type, compaction, slope and drainage of the backfill, and the rigidity of the wall against rotation and deflection. For a very rigid wall where negligible or very little deflection will occur, an "at -rest" lateral earth pressure should be used in design. For walls which can deflect or rotate 0.5 to 1 percent of wall height (depending upon the backfill types), lower "active" lateral earth pressures are appropriate. Our experience indicates typical basement walls can deflect or rotate slightly under normal design loads, and that this deflection results in satisfactory wall performance. Thus, the earth pressures on the walls will likely be between the "active" and "at -rest" conditions. If the on-site soils are used as backfill, we recommend design of below -grade walls using an equivalent fluid density of at least 45 pcf for this site. This equivalent density does not include allowances for sloping backfill, surcharges or hydrostatic pressures. The recommended equivalent density assumes deflection; some minor cracking of walls may occur. If very little wall deflection is desired, a higher equivalent fluid density may be appropriate for design. Our recent experience indicates most basement and below -grade walls designed with 45 pcf to 50 pcf equivalent fluid density have performed satisfactorily. The structural engineer should also consider site specific grade restrictions and the effects of large openings on the behavior of the walls. Backfill placed adjacent to foundation wall exteriors should be free of organic matter, debris and MR. TIM DORSEY LOT E48. ASPEN GLEN CTLJT JOB NO. GS -0755 7 rocks larger than 6 inches in diameter. Backfill should be moisture conditioned to within 2 percent of optimum moisture content and compacted to at least 95 percent of standard Proctor (ASTM D 698) maximum dry density. Water from rain, snow melt and surface irrigation of lawns and landscaping frequently flows through relatively permeable backfill placed adjacent to a residence and collects on the surface of relatively impermeable soils occurring at the bottom of the excavation. This can cause wet or moist conditions in basement and crawl space areas after construction. To reduce the likelihood water pressure will develop outside foundation walls and reduce risk of accumulation of water in the crawl space and basement, we recommend provision of a foundation drain. The drain should consist of a 4 -inch diameter, open joint or slotted pipe encased in free draining gravel. The drain should lead to a positive gravity outfall, or to a sump pit where water can be removed by pumping. A typical foundation drain detail is presented on Figure 4. Ventilation is important to maintain acceptable humidity levels in crawl spaces. A recent trend in the Roaring Fork Valley is to ventilate crawl spaces with air from the living area of residences. The mechanical systems designer should consider the humidity and temperature of air, and air flow volumes, during design of crawl space ventilation systems. It may be appropriate to install ventilation systems that are controlled by humiditstat. SURFACE DRAINAGE Surface drainage is critical to the performance of foundations, floor slabs and concrete flatwork. We recommend the following precautions be observed during construction and maintained at all times after the residence is completed: 1. The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the residence should be sloped to drain away from the residence in all directions. We MR. TIM DORSEY LOT E48, ASPEN GLEN CTLIT JOB NO. GS.4155 8 recommend providing a slope of at least 12 inches in the first 10 feet around the residence, where possible. In no case should the slope be less than 6 inches in the first 5 feet. 2. Backfill around the exterior of foundation walls should be placed in maximum 10 inch thick loose lifts, moisture conditioned to within 2 percent of optimum moisture content and compacted to at least 95 percent of standard Proctor (ASTM D 698) maximum dry density. 3. Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill. Splash blocks and downspout extensions should be provided at all discharge points. 4. Landscaping should be carefully designed to minimize irrigation. Plants used near foundation walls should be limited to those with low moisture requirements; irrigated grass should not be located within 5 feet of the foundation. Sprinklers should not discharge within 5 feet of the foundation and should be directed away from the building. 5. Impervious plastic membranes should not be used to cover the ground surface immediately surrounding the residence. These membranes tend to trap moisture and prevent normal evaporation from occurring. Geotextile fabrics can be used to control weed growth and allow some evaporation to occur. LIMITATIONS The exploratory borings drilled at the site provide a reasonably accurate picture of subsurface conditions. Variations in the subsurface conditions not indicated by the borings will occur. We should observe the completed foundation excavation to confirm the gravel soil is exposed and suitable for support of the footings as designed. Our report was based on conditions disclosed by our exploratory borings, engineering analysis and our experience. Criteria presented reflect our understanding of the proposed construction. If construction will differ significantly from the descriptions in the report, we should be informed so that we can check that our recommendations and design criteria are appropriate. MR. TIM DORSEY LOT E48, ASPEN GLEN CTLR JOB NO. GS -4155 9 This investigation was conducted in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by engineering geologists and geotechnical engineers currently practicing under similar conditions in the locality of this project. No other warranty, express or implied, is made. If we can be of further service in discussing the contents of this report or in the analysis of the influence of the subsoil conditions on the design of the structure, please call. CTUTHOMPSON, INC. 5 // y e . J lees D. Kellogg, .E. Project En • ineer Revie John Branc JDK:J (5 cope MR. TIM DORSEY LOT E48. ASPEN GLEN CTLT JOB NO. GS -4155 10 GS -4155_1-I J/01/04 CD o rb rei Nk tei c QCO C co t c C o A c C O EDZIdsy fo a6pa ss lr—SO 'aN qof SUMMARY LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS Elevation In Feet 11111111111111111111111111 wtht0 0 O O O N ut O N 0 N O rot oSj�Qc.).QyQD°jc.tQOSjOfjOgDQD5ca` N U•a �U^o pV^o �U la to o 0 00 J o 0 N 0 U 0 N O (1111111111111111111111111 093 ul uojJDAel3 z o —17— A W N 1m(1 o z xs oxvasoX 3 0 0 v 0 3� ° 0 O 7c o Eg• ala oo s2c1°0a O y 0 0 rt 3 •► p 3 0 .a o °v '3°~.,io O ° a0 gc , J� 00O rt3 '�a 147 f°Ol a 0 0 O c IT Q. a o.•v u rt n `: aaaro3. a° . _ 103 o-� ° c °< m 3 as as 5 3 1 a a iiH 411 * 0 a la mi 0 7 0° rt� 0`[ O n 1 1 SpO °� 3 0°.403°• u a2 -a 3 a ° O. a • a- 3 a a 0 y • •• � 0 O rt O practical solid—stem auger IESIIP 0— octor o 3 o 0 C �� a< ° 3 3 a 0 aC rt 0 0 w m o �0 4 _ �" 3� p'°° ° ? as 0 v_3a.0 000 7C—C ' a 3 rt • 0 3 O a' O 0 J 7 — o N0 o J -i "ca u ° ° S Y=0 'O °a o 0 o rt • 0 • 1° ('C 1:1-.< a W ° 3 0 3 1 O o ° o0 0oX 040 0 On J a _ -..-,se °0A\ Oa n a- O N 0 3 0 0 O 30 0 3 c -c 30 .0� 1 M 1 30 0 O °i a -O ora 030 0 HYDROMETER ANALYSIS SIEVE ANALYSIS 25HR 7HR 45 MIN 1519N. 100 90 80 i 70 60 S 50 ° 40 30 .. 20 10 0 .001 TIME READINGS U.S. STANDARD SERIES 03 MIN. 19 MIN. 4MN. 1 MN. R03 100 '50 140 10 16 '10'6 Y CLEAR SQUARE OPENINGS 367 3a' 11T 3' 76 8' 0 t 0 002 .005 .009 .019 037 .074 .149 297 0.42 590 1.19 2 0 2.39 4.76 9.52 19.1 38.1 78.2 W WETER OF PARTICLE IN MLLU.£7ERS 10 20 30 0 40 € 50 EY, 80 70 60 90 m 127 200 152 CLAY (PLASTIC) TO SILT (NON -PLASTIC) SANDS GRAVEL FINE ' NEDIUM 1 COARSE FINE 1 COARSE ) COBBLES Sample of GRAVEL, SLIGHTLY SILTY (GP -GM) From TI -1-2 AT 16-18 FEET GRAVEL 82 % SAND 12 SILT & CLAY 6 % LIQUID LIMIT - PLASTICITY INDEX - % 0 so 50 n 40 30 HYDROMETER ANALYSIS SIEVE ANALYSIS 25 HR. 7 HR. 45 MIN 15 MN 100 90 80 70 TIME READINGS U 5. STANDARD SERIES CLEAR SQUARE OPENINGS 60 MN. 19 MN. 4MN. 1MN 200 900 150'40 S0 18 '10'8 4 air 3/C 1'V T 5.6' r fr 20 10 0001 0 002 0 10 20 30 o z 40 4 50 60 70 60 -1 -----. 90 005 009 019 037 074 149 297 0 42590 1.19 2.0 2.38 4 76 952 DIAMETER OF PARTICLE IN MILLIMETERS 191 361 76 2 127 200 152 CLAY (PLASTIC) TO SILT (NON -PLASTIC) SANDS GRAVEL FINE I MEDIUM I COARSE FINE 1 COARSE ' COBBLES Sample of From JOB NO. 35-4155 GRAVEL % SAND SILT & CLAY % LIQUID LIMIT % PLASTICITY INDEX Gradation Test Results FIG. • SLOPE PER OSHA SLOPE PER REPORT BACKFILL — (coMPOsmON MID COMPACTION PER REPORT) BELOW GRADE WALL NOTE: DRAIN SHOULD BE AT LEAST 2 INCHES BELOW BOTTOM OF FOOTING AT THE HIGHEST POINT AND SLOPE DOWNWARD TO A POSITIVE GRAVITY OUTLET OR TO A SUMP WHERE WATER CAN BE REMOVED BY PUMPING. ENCASE PIPE IN WASHED CONCRETE AGGREGATE (ASTM C33, NO. 57 OR NO. 67) EXTEND GRAVEL TO AT LEAST 1/2 HEIGHT OF FOOTING. COVER GRAVEL WITH FILTER FABRIC. Job No. GS -4155 REINFORCING STEEL PER STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS PROVIDE POSITIVE SLIP JOINT BETWEEN SLAB AND WALL. FLOOR SLAB MINIMUM 8" MINIMUM OR BEYOND 1:1 SLOPE FROM BOTTOM OF FOOTING. (WHICHEVER 15 GREATER) 4—INCH DIAMETER PERFORATED DRAIN PIPE. THE PIPE SHOULD BE LAID IN A TRENCH WITH A MINIMUM SLOPE OF 0.5 PERCENT. FOOTING OR PAD PROVIDE PVC SHEETING GLUED TO FOUNDATION WALL TO REDUCE MOISTURE PENETRATION Exterior Foundati n Wall Drain Flg. 4 JOB NO. GS -4155 SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS SOIL CLASSIFICATION GRAVEL, SLIGHTLY SILTY (GP -GM) 1 GRAVEL, SLIGHTLY SILTY (GP -GM) 1 (%) 3A3IS 00Z ON DNISSVd GRADATION TESTS 1 1- 0 PERCENT, GRAVEL (%) 82 BERG LIMITS PLASTICITY INDEX (%) ATTER LIQUID LIMIT (%) J J W e 0) NATURAL DRY DENSITY (PCF) NATURAL MOISTURE (%) N M _" ll W W 0 a m 0 Z EE p m m 2 H N S 1-- 0 COa 'Note. Swell due to welting under an applied load of 1,000 psf Negative values indicate consolidation