Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication- Permit4 71 t 1 T • iGarfaeld County Building & Sanitation Department 108 8Ih Street, Suite #201 Glenwood Springs, Co. 81601 Office- 945-8212 Inspection Line- 384-5003 NO. Cik Job Address /05 / Cors-w-rt1 Z 1)) C4D„c,.z CO Nature of Work Building. Permit ,911 3 -/Oct - ®© 07 1 se of Building /t rbe)1; 1-t41.4 () sift �T� G4a( arCKJ Owner r tD >�1 c K S � idat ) Contractor r./ P i suCC GRIT -EX an 5T Amount of Permit $ Re 57. O S +32.2.17 Date 51/05 tM&lerk GARFIELD COUNTY BUILT TNG PERMIT APPLICATION /�, 'f ` GARFIELD COUNTY (GLENWOOD SPRINGS), COLORADO ]_ Y 643 - i vOO -09f TEIfPHONE: ;970) 945-8212 ' ON LINE. (97 0) 384-5 5 O 3 - JJ V 1 PERMIT NO. -11d\ PARCEL/SCHEDULE NO A39,1,9/.2 TOB NOB ADDRESS: %CEJ 1 CC 1,n 1 y /1'1?nctct 11 Cwr&endt i , Co /-67 3 ) , LOT NO. BLOCK 40. SUBDIVISION/FJEMFITON 2 ° _, ,.,; 1 k s '' iol5 r I ( I R. EA igiS- syr 3 °"""�°` vice �-k CI ' . rs(7 Pit* kve -#-loi '� 9N5Y5 "`3[/G i ci ^� '/�5.3 IJCN°�-1'��s 4 �I 14/Me`VQy A°°889 �,w7Ld St c\ g` @t AIi3 � 5 fig. PT OF BUILDING 7 it] F,'n. SQ.PCOPL°f + A GrS Em� 74 01 NO OF ORS 2. 6 JJ O9°F9RIDI° Res l*e)(11-E1. V 5/PO►'1 - - cJ /_�/J/y2v�-L�ec. /V � AIME Moet �f1%^� /�e►�1 �esi�eno.� '[ 8 CLASS OP NOM °a®mod oALIeaAIBIl1 wore waI°ve a9/I/a�Eop°OOU—BLE T. =Nat WOVYF -it 9 Fr v09ADA � Val mist /X-. 10 AY9 P. m _JL4��An,� -- ,'f ,�9M� , ,... ,9 8 Bmai key.) h rz Gfae.Q //1 �J/J/� s(°,(ror,w vAIVA>IomoFMoac ,: ... v.R.°wltma � /�i t7 / /• c� '1a/fr Omare E - 1s G✓ iolJon fry.a. o 11»r'4Y`-6e - bit OPS rAla `--iE..&C.° •?L h¢1IQ, Fria Stn, oc &i. 6- -1405" 11 A COLORADO \� PARATE '�}C 09T NOTICE ELECTRICAL PERMIT 15 REQUIRED AND MUST BE ISSUED BY THE STATE OF 30E4. 85- PLAN CHE`FEE:��O ��jj 2-95/I �, //�� � 9747 THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WIILIN 110 DAYS, OR IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOA A PERIOD OF 110 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. TGTA/L�EEE�:j�/�] 2 �DATE `PERMIT ISSUED: r/g-,�r 7a��o / . V $ 7855; q +' /50 = 7? a1.7Y] 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS GOVERNINGTH1S TYPE OF WORK WILL L BE COMPLIED WITH WHETHERSPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. TGRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE OTHER STATE OR OCC: ��' CONST: TYPE: 2 — 0-I N u AUTH' • 1. TO VIOLATE LOCAL RE CONS •+ aN. OR CANCEL THE PROVISIONS OF ANY 1 G CO CIfON OR TE PERFORMANCE OF 51.13—(bit ZONING SETBACKS: -- Dara I , .. er aatbotissd aj®I S^'tg t dand -., ••d ..... ,.. / j1 'AV/ /0/ MANU. HOME: ADS NO. k NEE: �y. /,T,�N✓ OD ap A....,. a Ply .Hsi J �. ��° t AGREEMENT PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO THE APPLICANT AS OWNER, CONTRACTOR AND/OR THE AGENT OF THE CONTRACTOR OR OWNER TO CONSTRUCT THE STRUCTURE DETAILED ON PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SUBMUTED TO AND REVIEWED BY THE BUI DINGDEPARTAENT. IN CONSIDERATION OF THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT, THE SIQ.ER HEREBY AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL BUILDING CODES AND NAND USE REGULATIONS ADOPTED GARFIELD COUNTY PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GIVEN IN 30.21.201 CRS AS AMENDED. THE SIGNER FURIIER AGREES THAT IF THE ABOVE SAID ORDINANCES ARE NOT FUL COMPLIED WITH IN THE LOCATION, ERECTION, CONSTRUCTION AND USE OF TIE ABOVE DESCRIED STRUCTURE, THE PERMIT MAY THEN BE REVOKED BY NOTICE FRc THE COUNTY AND THAT THIN AND THERE IT SHALL BECOME NULL AND VOID. THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT BASED UPON TRANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA SHALL NOT PREVENT THE BUILDING OFFICIAL MOM THEREAFTER REQUIRING T CORRECTION OF ERRORS IN SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA OR FRO PREVENTING BUILDING OPERATION BEING CARRIED ON THEREUNDER WHEN VIOLATION OF THIS CODE OR ANY OTHER ORDINANCE OR REGULATION OF TEM IURLSDICIION. TIM REVIEW OF ME SUBMITTED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND INSPECTIONS CONDUCTED THEREAFTER DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ACCEPTANCE OF A RESPONSIBILITIES OR LIABILITIES BY GARFIELD COUNTY FOR ERRORS, OMISSIONS OR DISCREPANCIES. THE RESPONSEI rrY FOR THESE ITEMS AND ThQLEMFMATI DURING CONSTRUCTION RESTS SPECIFICALLY WITH THE ARCHITECT, DESIGNER, BUUDFR AND OWNFA COMMITS ARE INTENDED TOB BE CONSERVATIVE AND IN SUPPC OF THE OWNERS INTEREST. Grfam.003 I HEREBY ACKNOWI.EDOTHAT T HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE AGREEMENT ABOVE. (JNIIITAT.1 r klin. 0r. A\-, • • b The following items are required by Garfield County for a final inspection: 1. A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector; 2. Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department posted where readily visible from access road; 3. A finished roof, a lockable house, complete exterior siding, exterior doors and windows installed, a complete kitchen with cabinets, a sink with hot & cold running water, non-absorbent kitchen floor coverings, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove and refrigerator, all necessary plumbing; 4. A complete bathroom, with washbowl, tub or shower, toilet stool, hot and cold running water, non-absorbent floors and walls finished and a privacy door; 5. All steps outside or inside over three (3) steps must have handrails, guard rails on balconies or decks over 30" high constructed to all 1997 UBC requirements; 6. Outside grading done to where water will detour away from the building; 7. Exceptions to the outside steps, decks and grading may be made upon the demonstration of extenuating circumstances, i.e. weather, but a Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until all the required items are completed and a final inspection made. A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. ****CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (CO.) IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATING PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET. I understand and agree to abide by the above conditions for occupancy, use and the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the dwelling under building permit # 10\ Signature Date Bpcont082002 7 t VALUATION/FEE DETERMINATION Applicant 1,14r g3 Address /o5/ CO. /!! Date 5-D Cif Finished (Livable Area): Main 31e Upper '4/42. Lower )o1.fo Other Total Square Feet Valuation Subdivision Lot/Block Contractor er(ltce (raK Const. Sg/2 w 49 = 608, 028 Basement: 1 Unfinished 24(.9 ¢ / Conversion of Unfinished to Finished Plan Check Fee for Conversion Valuation Garage: Crawl Space: Valuation 8oj y !$ Valuation Imm 101, 2,21 /4443c, Decks/Patios: Covered 3(e, 7 ZO Valuation J'$ 3 0 `! 264 Open Valuation 41l 700 1372* (L ►6,4144 Total Valuation 7 7e, r17 "Twacc 1-R 32 31 75 t (27p x e) 75J ; 4549,90 t?0r. z . (IS(4549.90) = 2957 16 2isu l/ t VALUATION/FEE DETERMINATION Applicant {. -rc i[) Address lc 5/ Cie f (( Date 4—b c4 Pry Ace Cre, K Cons 74. 49L Zr0 10,32D 169= 7/208o c18/2 ), 6.1 = 6o6, 026 Subdivision Lot/Block Contractor It) Finished (Livable Area): Main 3 to Upper 5/42 Lower i o -f {o Other Total Square Feet Valuation Basement: Unfinished 241,9 x 4/ Conversion of Unfinished to Finished Plan Check Fee for Conversion Valuation Garage: Crawl Space: Valuation gpz y !2 Valuation Decks/Patios: Covered Valuation Open Valuation 1530 472. 700 Total Valuation Y 2 41 lint IL 9v/i4 394101 101,221 /4,43c. M,43k 31e, 7Z0 36, 720 14)14+4 464 77(9, g77 8/9 /or' lAtc.c 32 31 75 t(277 x 4 75j = 41519 90 ,60S(4s4`3.9o) = 2957.18 L"€ r/ 3 ►g -o5• le 4144Ato 1.49 4i4 -4.0 -‘et CRE. rrait 3233. 76- )64.753 '2-7 'v74e1Fcc .4.5(1747) = 3o0(0•15 PLairt 78s - 75- 07.03 ?fro 328.11 0 "fts GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING 970-945-8212 MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS for SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING CONSTRUCTION including NEW CONSTRUCTION ADDITIONS ALTERATIONS and MOVED BUILDINGS In order to understand the scope of the work intended under a permit application and expedite the issuance of a permit it is important that complete information be provided. Adequate and complete information will prevent delays in the plan review process. Reviewing a plan and the discovery that required information has not been provided by the applicant may result in the delay of the permit issuance and in proceeding with building construction. The owner or contractor may be required to provide this information before the plan review may proceed. This causes delays because other plans that are in line for review may be given attention before the new information may be reviewed after it has been provided to the Building Department. Please review this document to determine if you have enough information to design your project and provide adequate information to facilitate a plan review. If you do not, it may be helpful to obtain a book titled "Dwelling Construction under the Uniform Building Code". This book is available to you through this department at our cost. Also, please consider using a design professional for assistance in your design and a construction professional for construction of your project. To provide for a more understandable plan in order to determine compliance with the building, plumbing and mechanical codes, applicants are requested to review the following checklist prior to and during design. Applicants are required to indicate appropriately and to submit the completed checklist at time of application for a permit. 1 1 • Plans to be included for a Building Permit, must be on drafting paper at least 18"x24" and drawn to scale. Plans must include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations all sides with decks, balcony, steps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the finish grade line. A section showing in detail, from the bottom of the footing to the top of the roof, including re -bar, anchor bolts, pressure treated plates, floor joists, wall studs and spacing, insulation, sheeting, house - rap, (which is required), siding or any approved building material. A window schedule. A door schedule. A floor framing plan, a roof framing plan, roof must be designed to withstand a 40 pound per square foot up to 7,000 feet in elevation, an 80 M.P.H. windshear, wind exposure B, windload of 15 pounds per square foot, and a 36 inch frost depth. All sheets to be identified by number and indexed. All of the above requirements must be met or your plans will be returned. All plans submitted must be incompliance with the 1997 UBC, UMC and 1997 UPC. 1. Is a site plan included that identifies the location of the proposed structure or addition and distances to the property lines from each corner of the proposed structure(s) prepared by a licensed surveyor and has the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing? Properties with slopes of 30% or greater must be shown on the site plan. Yes k_ 2. Does the site plan also include any other buildings on the property, setback easements and utility easements? Yes 3. Does the site plan include when applicable the location of the I.S.D.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System) and the distances to the property lines, wells (on subject property and adjacent pr perties), streams or water courses? Yes 4. Does the site plan indicate the location and direction of the County or private road accessing the property?. Yes K 5. Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all reinforcing steel in accordance with the uniform building code or per stamped engineered design? Yes 2 • 6. Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl spaces and the 1e ances required between wood and earth? Yes /�V1 7. Do the plans indicate the size and location of ventilation openings for the attic, roof joist spaces's and soffits? Yes 8. Do the plans include design loads as required by Garfield County for roof snow loads, (a minimum of 40 pounds per square foot up to & including 7,000 feet above sea level), floor loads and wind loads? Yes 9. Does the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor, and roof construction?‘, Yes 10. Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists, wall studs, ceiling joists, roof rafters or joists or trusses? Yes 11. Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method of positive connection of all columns and beams? Yes X 12. Does the plan indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the highest point of the building or addition measured at mid span between the ridge and the eave down to existing (undisturbed) grade contours? Yes 13. Does the plan include any stove or zero clearance fireplace planned for installation including make and model and Colorado Phase II certifications or phase II EPA certification? Yes No 14. Does the plan include a masonry fireplace including a fireplace section indicating design to comply with the Uniform Building Code Chapter 37? Yes No 15. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that egress/rescue windows from sleeping rooms and/or basements comply with the requirements of the Uniform Building Code? Yes X, No 3 16. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that windows provide natural light and ventilation for all habitable rooms? Yes No 17. Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass doors, glazing immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as a walking surface; sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub enclosures and specify safety glazing for these areas? Yes No 18. Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces, boilers and water heaters indicated on e plan? Yes No 19. Do you understand that if you are building on a parcel of land created by the exemption process or the subdivision process, are building plans in compliance with all plat notes and/or covenants? Yes No 20. Do you understand that if you belong to a homeowners association, it is your responsibility to obtain written permission from the association, if required by that association, prior to submitting an application for a building permit? If you do not have written permission from the association, do you understand that the plan check fee will not be refunded should the architectural,5ommittee deny or reject your building plans? Yes /� No 21. Will this be t only residential structure on the parcel? Yes x No If no -Explain: 22. Have two (2) complete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the application? Yes 23. Do you understand that the minimum size a home can be on a lot is a 20ft. x 20ft.? Yes 11 No 24. Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other construction code requirements? Yes No 25. Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a final inspection by the Garfield County Building Department? Yes k No 4 26. Do you understand that approval for design and/or construction changes are required prior to the application of these changes? Yes x No 27. Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a "Plan Review" fee from you at the time of application submittal and that you will be required to pay the "Permit Fee" as well as any "Road Impact" or "Septic System" fees required, at the time you pick up your building permit? Yes % No 28. Are you aware that twenty-four (24) hour notice is required for all inspections? Inspections will be made from Battlement Mesa to West Glenwood in the mornings and from Glenwood Springs to Carbondale in the afternoons. All inspections must be called in by 3:30 p.m. the day before. Failure to give twenty-four (24) hour notice for inspections will delay your inspection one (1) day. Inspections are to be called in to 384-5003. Yes No 29. Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the Uniform Building Code including approval on a final inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy and occupancy of the building? Yes No 30. Are you aware that the person signing the Permit Application, whether the "Owner", "Agent of the Owner", "General Contractor", "Contractor" or otherwise, is the party responsible for the project complying with the Uniform Building Code? Yes x No 31. Are you aware that prior to issuance of a building permit you are required to show proof of a driveway access permit or obtain a statement from the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department stating one is not necessary? You can contact the Road & Bridge Department at 625-8601. Yes x No 32. Do you understand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed Electrician and Plumber to perform installations and hookups, unless you as the homeowner are performing the work? The license number of the person performing the work will be required at ti�ya of applicable inspection. Yes �\ No 5 a 33. Are you aware, that on the front of the Building Permit Application you will need to fill in the ParceUSchedule Number for the lot you are applying for this permit on prior to issuance of a building permit? Your attention in this is appreciated. Yes No I hereby acknowledge that I have read, understand and answered these questions to the t of my ability. f ,114 h(-3- aq Signature Date Phone: 6776-7_30—O((ays); Skote (evenings) Project Name: 1 GkS Qes \denc e Project Address: 105 C& l C rd a I e J CO a I {22_3 Notes: If you have answered "No" on any of the questions, you may be required to provide this information at the request of the Building Official prior to beginning the plan review process. Delays in issuing the permit are to be expected. Work may not proceed without the issuance of a permit. If it is determined by the Building Official that additional information is necessary to review the application and plans to determine minimum compliance with the adopted codes, the application may be placed behind more recent applications for building permits in the review process and not reviewed until required information has been provided and the application rotates again to first position for review, delay in issuance of the permit or delay in proceeding with construction. bpminreq 08/2002 6 Account R009612 ❑ Cancel STR Owner Name/Address HICKS, DAVID W,& CONNIE F. N CIO PRINCE CREEK CONSTRUCTION, INC. 1317 GRAND AVENUE, SUITE 101 Year Distr%t GLENWOODSPRINGSCO81601 2004 011 Apr Dist St A Parcel Number 2463-104-00-079 Street No Dlr Street Name MH Space Location City , Location Zip (Acct Type CARBONDALE 81623 BACode (Owner Id Owner Location (Map No Business Name Type lSeq SECT,TWN,RNG:10$8-88 DESC: SE; A TR OF LAND SITUATED IN SEC.10,11,14 AND 15. BK:865 PG:253 BK:774 PG:466 BK:568 PG:435 BK:549 PG:272 BK:519 PG:123 BK:360 PG:278 BK:1521 PG:204 RECPT:637021 BK:1432 PG:663 RECPT:619913 BK:1432 PG:660 RECPT:619912 BK:1202 PG:302 RECPT:567787 BK:869 PG:609 RECPT:450170 BK:869 PG:608 RECPT:450169 BK:869 PG.607 RECPT:450168 BK:869 PG:605 RECPT:450167 BK:0869 PG:0614 BK:774 PG:469 RECPT:410622 PRE:R006474 • ® Name N. Tax Items❑ Protest (T) ;; ® CAMA (A) Situs Pre/SuMobile Auth •❑ Permit r, AGRICULTURAL L .,•r..,.,,.,,. bile ..., . c Li.... _., AGRICULTURAL ❑ Mobile Remarks ❑ ❑ Value • Personal (P TYPE ACTUAL 5,190 4,390 79,960 . Tract; ❑ Tax Sale ;::•: LJ Oil and Gas AGRICULTURAL R NI .;❑ Condo Spc Asml❑ Control ❑ Recording ASSD ACRES SQ FT 1,500 23.055 1,270 6,360 Block ;O:Mines 111 History ❑ Imaging TOTAL Sibling ❑ PPCertLtr `• El Photo , , , Sales ?'• ] Mlsc (tvt Flags ❑ Exemptlo Taxchange.? 89,540 9,130 23.055 Queries Sketch ACCOUNT Current Year Prior Version Tax Trx Prior Year Ne(x)t Version Abatement Next Year Characteristics Property Card Update Clear Exit • • Ln 0 O W 2 to r1 H Z rA — 0 — • Applicant PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST arc IL) Date Building /Engineered Foundation Driveway Permit L 4'urveyed Site Plan ✓Septic Permit and Setbacks `—Grade/Topography 30% tach Residential Plan Review List ,Minimum Application Questionnaire p.4 Subdivision Plat Notes MrFire Department Review ,-"C/aluation Determination/Fees `led Line Plans/Stamps/Sticker Attach Conditions ✓Application Signed Plan Reviewer To Sign Application ,. tarcel/Schedule No. 40# Snowload Letter- Manf. Hms. GENERAL NOTES: Planning/Zoning Property Line Setbacks 30ft Stream Setbacks Flood Plain Building Height Zoning Sign -off Road Impact Fees HOA/DRC Approval Grade/Topography 40% Planning Issues Subdivision Plat Notes Garfield County Road and Bridge, District 1 7300 Hwy 82, Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 970-945-1223 ph. 945-1318 FAX Date: 04-15-04 To: Building & Planning From: Bobby Branham Re: Driveway permit exemption For: David Hicks 1051 CR 111 Carbondale CO 81623 Ph. 945-2125 Fx. 945-4848 Contractor: Prince Creek Const. 1317 Grand Ave. #101 Glenwood Springs CO 81601 Ph. 945-4545 Location: 1051 CR 111 Carbondale CO 81623 Scope of Work: Obtain building permit Road and Bridge Concerns: This property lies outside the system of maintained county roads, and is therefore exempt from County driveway permit requirements. Bobby Branham Dist.1 Road and Bridge • • WATER SERVICE AND PIPELINE EASEMENT AGREEMENT The Town of Carbondale, Colorado, a Colorado Municipal Corporation, acting by and through its Board of Trustees (hereinafter the "Town"), David W. Hicks and Connie F. Hicks (hereinafter the "Hicks") and P.C.I., L.L.L.P. (a limited liability limited partnership owned or controlled by David W. Hicks and Connie F. Hicks, hereinafter "PCI") agree as follows: RECITALS a. The Town owns and operates a municipal water system which obtains water from several sources, including a pipeline which delivers water to the Town from Nettle Creek, a tributary of the Crystal River located on the northern slopes of Mount Sopris about eight miles south of the Town (hereinafter referred to as the "Town's Nettle Creek water main"). As used in this agreement, the tern "Town potable water" shall refer to water diverted by the Town from Nettle Creek and its tributaries, treated at the Town's Nettle Creek water treatment plant, and delivered through the Town's Nettle Creek water main for use by customers of the Town's municipal water system. b. Along its route from Nettle Creek to Town, the Town's Nettle Creek water main traverses numerous private properties, including a property known as "the Cerise Ranch" that was at one point owned by Victor Cerise and later by his son, Flaven J. Cerise. c. On or about September 14, 1953, the Town and Victor Cerise entered into a Pipe Line Right of Way agreement, a copy of which was recorded in the Office of the Garfield County Clerk & Recorder on February 11, 1954 in Book 275 on Page 181, Reception No. 185012 (the "1953 Agreement"). Among other things, the 1953 Agreement provided that Victor Cerise conveyed to the Town a 40 -foot wide pipeline easement. Such conveyance was made in consideration of Victor Cerise being given a right to "install a ' inch water line onto said Town water line" and to receive "free domestic water for so long as the easement or right of way above described is used by the Town for water pipe lines." d. Hicks purchased the Cerise Ranch in 1993. This ownership is evidenced by a Warranty Deed from Flaven J. Cerise recorded in the Office of the Garfield County Clerk & Recorder on July 21, 1993 in Book 869 on Page 609, Reception No. 450170, and a Personal Representative's Deed recorded in the same office and on the same date as Reception No. 450171 in Book 869 at Page 614. TOWN OF CARBONDALE-Hicks-Settlement Agreement Water Service and Pipeline Easement Agreement Town of Carbondale/Hicks/PCI Page 2 e. As of the date of this Agreement, Hicks own most of the property formerly known as the Cerise Ranch, with the following two exceptions: (1) Hicks developed a portion of the Cerise Ranch into a six -lot subdivision known as Prince Creek Estates. This subdivision is described on a Final Plat recorded in the Office of the Garfield County Clerk & Recorder on August 2, 1994, Reception No. 466582. (No lots within Prince Creek Estates are presently connected to the Town's water system). (2) Hicks conveyed a 35.274 acre portion of the Cerise Ranch to PCI, LLP (referred to in this Agreement as "PCI property") pursuant to a Quit Claim Deed recorded in the Office of the Garfield County Clerk & Recorder on August 16, 2000 in Book 1202 on Page 302, Reception No. 567787. (A barn facility, which includes two integrated residences and an office, has been built on this parcel by the Hicks, which facility is presently connected to the Town's water system via underground delivery lines that extend across the Hicks and PCI properties). The property presently owned by the Hicks (the "Hicks property"), therefore, consists of the property described in the Warranty Deed referred to above in recital paragraph d., less Prince Creek Estates and the PCI property. f. The Town and the Hicks are presently litigating the scope of the Town's obligation to provide free Town potable water pursuant to the 1953 Agreement in Garfield County District Court Case No. 00CV035-A. Many issues raised by the parties in this case were determined by the Court in its Order on Cross Motions for Summary Judgment entered February 12, 2001. Remaining issues are scheduled for trial to the Court on November 18, 19, and 20, 2002. g. In order to avoid the expense associated with further litigation, the Town and the Hicks (on behalf of themselves and PCI) have mutually agreed to settle their respective claims and to clarify the terms of the easement for the Town's water main and the Town's obligation to provide free Town potable water pursuant to the 1953 Agreement. WHEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises contained in this Agreement, and other good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency of which is TOWN OF CARBONDALE-Hicks.Settlement Agreement Water Service and Pipeline Easement Agreement Town of Carbondale/Hicks/ACI Page 3 acknowledged, the Town and the Hicks, for themselves and on behalf of P.C.I., L.L.L.P., agree as follows: 1. 1953 AGREEMENT. This document is intended to interpret and amend the 1953 Agreement. Although the 1953 Agreement shall remain in effect, the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement shall govern in the event of any conflict between the two documents. 2. No SERVICE TO PRINCE CREEK ESTATES. The Town shall have no obligation to provide any water service to the Prince Creek Estates subdivision. 3. EASEMENT FOR NETTLE CREEK WATER MAIN. a. The Hicks and PCI hereby confirm that, by virtue of the 1953 Agreement, the Town has a permanent non-exclusive water pipeline easement within twenty feet (20') on either side of the centerline of the Town's Nettle Creek water main as now in place on the Hicks and PCI properties. The parties agree that the purpose of this water pipeline easement is for access to, and operation, maintenance, repair, replacement and enlargement of, the Town's water main as well as the right to monitor, maintain, repair and replace the existing 3/4 -inch water tap and meter which delivers water to the Hicks and PCI properties subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. Any repair, excavation, or replacement of the existing line shall be promptly executed in a good and workmanlike manner. No excavation shall be left open unless protected in a manner reasonably intended to prevent persons, equipment or livestock from falling into the excavation. b. A surveyed description of the centerline of the Town's Nettle Creek water main is attached to this Agreement. The Hicks' and/or PCI's use of the property within the easement area shall be limited to uses not inconsistent with the Town's easement rights. Hicks acknowledge that any improvements or structures they construct within or over the easement will be at their risk and Hicks further agree to remove or relocate said improvements or structures from the easement in the event that the Town needs to maintain or repair the water pipeline in a location encumbered by said improvements or structure(s), provided however that the Town agrees to restore any grazing fences that it removes or disturbs within the easement area on the Hicks' property to a condition substantially similar to that which existed prior to the commencement of any maintenance or repair. The Hicks may at their option provide an alternate method of maintenance or repair in areas encumbered by an improvement or structure so long as the alternate method does not unreasonably delay the repair and the additional cost of the TOWN OF CARBONDALE-Hicks-Settlement Agreement Water Service and Pipeline Easement Agreement Town of Carbondale/Nicks/PCI Page 4 alternate method is borne solely by the Hicks and the Town consents to the alternate methods, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. c. Hicks & PCI are agreeing to confirm the Town's Nettle Creek water main easement in exchange for the Town agreeing to continue water service to the Hicks and PCI properties pursuant to the 1953 Agreement and the terms and conditions specified below. Except as specifically set forth in this Agreement, the Town will do nothing to unreasonably impair delivery of Town potable water to Hicks and PCI other than during situations which require maintenance of the Town's Nettle Creek water main, plant maintenance, meter installation, backflow prevention and other normal maintenance which may necessitate temporarily shutting off or altering water flow in the pipeline. 4. OWNERSHIP AND CONTROL OF PCI, LLLP. As of the date of this Agreement, the Hicks represent that they continue to own or control P.C.I., L.L.L.P., and that the Hicks have authority to bind PCI and subject the PCI property to the terms of this Agreement. The PCI property shall be entitled to continued water service from the Town, subject to the conditions in this Agreement. 5. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF WATER SERVICE. The Town shall continue to be obligated to provide domestic water service to the Hicks and PCI properties through the existing 3/4 -inch tap to the Town water main now on the Hicks property pursuant to the 1953 Agreement, subject to the following limitations and conditions: a. Usage metered. The Hicks' and PCI's usage of Town potable water usage will be measured by the Town at the existing meter location proximate to the Town's Nettle Creek water main on the Hicks property. The Town will send a monthly statement to the Hicks or their designated successor via U.S. mail. The Town will not be required to bill multiple parties, or to send separate statements to the Hicks and PCI properties or any parts thereof. b. Limited amount of water. The Town's obligation to provide Town potable water free -of -charge through the existing %-inch tap on the Hicks property shall be limited to up to 50,000 gallons free water per month, with no carry-over from month-to-month. Hicks may purchase up to an additional 50,000 gallons of water per month at the Town's out-of-town water service rates, as such rates may change from time to time (as of the date of this Agreement, the Town's current monthly out-of-town rates are as follows: $1.75 per thousand gallons for the first six thousand gallons; $2.39 per thousand gallons for the next nine thousand gallons; $3.18 per thousand gallons for any amount over fifteen thousand gallons). The failure of the Town to charge for water usage in one or more instances shall not constitute a waiver of the right to do so in the future. TOWN OF CARBONDALE-Hicks-Settlement Agreement Water Service and Pipeline Easement Agreement Town of Carbondale/Hicks/PCI Page 5 The Town shall not unreasonably delay billing Hicks for water usage in excess of 50,000 gallons per month. c. Excess water deliveries. If Town potable water delivered through the Y4 -inch tap and water meter to the Hicks or PCI properties exceeds 100,000 gallons in any month for any reason, the Town shall promptly notify Hicks in writing of the excess water delivery. Hicks shall then have thirty (30) calendar days to correct the situation. Said 30 -day period will be reasonably extended by the Town, upon Hicks request, in the event that weather conditions (including but not limited to such things as frozen ground, snow, etc.) prevent repair work on the Hicks system. Hicks shall pay the Town for any water delivered in excess of 100,000 gallons in any one month at a rate of twice the then - applicable out-of-town water rate. In the event of continuing excess usage after the 30 - day notice period has passed, in addition to the right to charge twice the then -applicable out-of-town water rate for water delivered in excess of 100,000 gallons per month, the Town shall have the right to immediately discontinue water service to the Hicks and PCI properties and until all past -due amounts are paid in full and the Town is notified by the Hicks that any leaks that may have existed have been repaired and that any other excess water use will be discontinued. The failure of the Town to curtail water service or to charge for any excess water usage in one or more instances shall not constitute a waiver of the right to do so in the future. d. Maximum number of units to be served with Town water. The total number of residential dwelling units that may be served with Town potable water on the Hicks and /or PCI properties pursuant to this agreement will not exceed six (6). The parties to this Agreement intend that these units shall include: (1) the original Cerise ranch house; (2) a new modular house; (3) & (4) two apartment residences in the barn facility on the PCI property; (5) and old "bunkhouse" on the Hicks property that the Hicks may rehabilitate in the future; and (6) a new home that may be built on the Hicks property in the future (which new home may, if permitted by Garfield County, include one integrated accessory dwelling unit no greater than 1,500 square fee in size which cannot be sold separately from the main residence). In addition to the foregoing residences, water service shall also be continued to the existing office in the barn, livestock corrals (subject to limitations below), and agricultural outbuildings now existing or to be replaced in the future. Hicks and PCI agree not to extend water service lines to any units in addition to or other than those described above unless the Town consents in writing prior to any such extension or change, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld; provided, however, that Hicks may move or replace agricultural outbuildings and corrals without Town permission. TOWN OF CARBONDALE-Hicks-Settlement Agreement • Water Service and Pipeline Easement Agreement Town of Carbondale/Hicks/PCI Page 6 e. Types of water use. The permissible uses of water under this agreement include in-house domestic use for the six residences, barn office, and agricultural outbuildings described in the preceding paragraph, livestock watering, and limited ornamental tree and shrub irrigation, subject to the following limitations: (1) The parties acknowledge that, in the past, Town potable water was sometimes allowed to flow through livestock troughs on the Hicks or PCI properties continuously. The Hicks and PCI shall avoid this waste of Town potable water in the future. To the extent that livestock troughs on the property will be connected to Town potable water, all such troughs must be fitted with appropriate conservation mechanisms (such as heaters and float valves, or other comparable technology) designed to reasonably limit the amount of Town potable water delivered to animals on the property. Flicks shall have the discretion to choose the specific type of equipment necessary to prevent Town potable water from continuously flowing in the future. All such improvements shall be at Hicks' expense. (2) Hicks, at their own expense will also complete the installation of pumps and pipes as necessary to irrigate all lawn and garden areas on the Hicks or PCI properties with ditch water. Such installation shall be completed prior to June 1, 2003. After such date, Town potable water shall no longer be used by Hicks or PCI for lawn and garden irrigation; provided however that Hicks and PCI shall be allowed to use water from the Town system during the non irrigation season (i.e. when irrigation ditches are not running) for incidental irrigation of trees and shrubs, but not for irrigation of lawns or gardens. Hicks and PCI will also use ditch water whenever reasonably possible for livestock watering. Nothing in this Agreement is intended to limit Hicks' or PCI's use of irrigation ditch water available to them each year — rather, the Town encourages Hicks and PCI to conserve Town potable water by using ditch water for all lawful purposes whenever possible. (3) Hicks and PCI's use of Town potable water shall also be subject to the following provisions relating to emergency TOWN OF CARBONDALE-Hicks-Settlement Agreement • Water Service and Pipeline Easement Agreement Town of Carbondale/Hicks/PCI Page 7 water shutoff, water shortages, water crisis, cross connections, and backflow prevention. (a) The Town may shut off the potable water supply to the Hicks in the event of an emergency to the Nettle Creek Plant or pipeline where it becomes necessary to shut off the plant or pipeline. The Town shall use all reasonable efforts to minimize the disruption in potable water service to the Hicks during any emergency shut off situation. (b) Hicks and PCI also agree to comply with the following water conservation measures which may be requested by the Town as long as the same water conservation measures are required of all other Town water system customers. i. No Town potable water shall be used for the washing of vehicles, patios, sidewalks or paved areas. ii. No Town potable water shall be used for the filling of swimming pools or hot tubs. iii. No Town potable water shall be used for dust control. iv. No Town potable water shall be used for the watering of shrubs, trees, flowers, etc. (c) Hicks agree that the Town water system shall not be cross -connected to any other water supply and that any potable waterlines or appurtenances installed by Hicks or PCI shall be in accordance with the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE) standards. (d) Hicks and PCI acknowledge that the Town of Carbondale may implement a backflow prevention program, to comply with the Colorado Department TOWN OF CARBONDALE-Hicks-settlement Agreement Water Service and Pipeline Easement Agreement Town of Carbondale/Hicks/PCI Page 8 of Public Health and Environment regulations and applicable Colorado Statutes. In the event said program is implemented, Hicks acknowledges Town's right to install a backflow prevention device within the easement adjacent to the water meter. Said mechanism shall be designed so as not to impair the delivery of Town potable water to the Hicks and PCI. (e) Hicks and PCI shall not waste Town potable water. f. Town's delivery obligation ends at the meter. The Town shall deliver water through the existing meter location on the Hicks property, but the Town shall have no responsibility to ensure delivery of water or quality of water past this point to individual units on the Hicks or PCI properties, to regulate usage as between units, or to repair or maintain the delivery pipes beyond the existing'/. -inch tap and water meter. Although the Town shall remain obligated to provide water to the Hicks and PCI in the future in the amounts and according to the terms specified in this Agreement, Hicks and PCI assume all risk that said amounts may prove insufficient to serve all of the units and types of uses allowable under this Agreement. g. Point of delivery. Town potable water will be delivered to Hicks and PCI at a point just past the water meter. Hicks or PCI may use any method or mechanism that delivers said potable water from the point of delivery to the points of use at a pressure and volume that the Hicks deem adequate. The methods and mechanisms may include but are not limited to pumps, storage tanks, oversized pipelines, etc. Hicks and PCI accept all risk that may arise from storage of water. h. Future relocation of Town water main. The 1953 Agreement provided that the Town's obligation to provide water to the Cerise Ranch would terminate if the Town's water main was ever relocated off of the property. In consideration of the limitations in this Agreement that Hicks and PCI have agreed to with regard to their future use of Town water, the Town agrees that, should the Town's water main be relocated in the future, the Town will continue to provide water service to the Flicks and/or PCI properties if all water (up to maximum of 100,000 gallons) is paid for at then -applicable out-of-town rates and subject to continuing compliance with all other terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. 6. INSPECTION. Upon reasonable notice, the Town will be entitled to enter upon the Hicks or PCI properties and any improvements upon such properties for the TOWN OF CARBONDALE-Hicks-Settlement Agreement Water Service and Pipeline Easement Agreement Town of Carbondale/Nicks/PCJ Page 9 purpose of verifying compliance with the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. Hicks shall be provided with no less than fourteen (14) days advance written notice via U.S. Mail and Hicks shall be given a reasonable opportunity to have a representative present for any such inspection. If underground lines are to be inspected by the Town, excavation, backfill and reasonable surface restoration shall be at the Town's expense. 7. BINDING EFFECT. The terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the Town, Hicks and PCI, their successors and assigns, and shall run with title to the Hicks and PCI properties. A copy of this Agreement will be filed with the Garfield County Clerk & Recorder to provide notice to any subsequent owners of the Hicks and PCI properties of the Town's limited water delivery obligations. 8. DISPUTE RESOLUTION AND REMEDIES. In the event of a dispute arising under this agreement, the parties agree to participate in mediation. If mediation is unsuccessful, the parties agreed to participate in binding arbitration pursuant to the Uniform Arbitration Act, Colo. Rev. Stat. §§ 13-22-201 to –223. A single arbitrator shall be selected by mutual agreement of the parties to conduct the arbitration pursuant to the Commercial Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration Association. Should the parties fail to participate in mediation, or fail to agree upon an arbitrator, upon petition of either party a single arbitrator shall be appointed by the Garfield County District Court pursuant to Colo. Rev. Stat. § 13-22-205. In the alternative, either party may seek administration by the American Arbitration Association provided that the party electing as such shall be required to pay all AAA administrative fees. In either type of arbitration, the arbitrator shall be empowered to grant both legal and equitable relief—the parties agree that water is a unique and valuable asset in the nature of real property and that, therefore, the breach by either party of the terms of this Agreement could cause irreparable harm that would warrant the issuance of preliminary or permanent injunctive relief or a decree of specific performance. The arbitrator shall also be empowered to award the substantially prevailing party in any dispute reasonable costs and attorneys' fees. Either party may request the Garfield County District Court to confirm any arbitration award as an Order of the Court pursuant to Colo. Rev. Stat. § 13-22-213 and to enforce the terms of any such award pursuant to the Colorado Rules of Civil Procedure. 9. NOTICE. Any notice pursuant to this Agreement shall be sent by First Class U.S. Mail, effective upon mailing, to the following addresses (unless either party notifies the other of a change in address pursuant to the provisions of this paragraph, in which event notice shall be directed to the new address): TOWN OF CARBONDALE-Hicks-Settlement Agreement Water Service and Pipeline Easement Agreement Town of Carbondale/Hicks/PCI Page 10 Town Manager The Town of Carbondale 511 Colorado Avenue Carbondale, Colorado 81623 TOWN OF CARBONDALE-Hicks-Settlement Agreement David and Connie Hicks PCI, LLP 1051 Prince Creek Road Carbondale, Colorado 81623 Water Service and Pipeline Easement Agreement Town of Carbondale/Hicks/PCI Page 11 10. GOVERNING LAW. This Agreement shall be construed according to Colorado law. The sole venue for any dispute arising as to the terms of this Agreement shall be in the District Court in and for Garfield County, Colorado. The presiding judge in any such dispute shall award the substantially prevailing party reasonable costs and attorneys' fees. 11. TOWN APPROVAL. The Town represents that its Board of Trustees has approved the terms of this Agreement and authorized the Mayor to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Town. DATED: ATTEST: Suzanfle Cerise, Town Clerk k)J4vDA W. HICKS 0 �Qr 1 .,Dal David Hicks, General Partner , 2003. THE TOWN OF CARBONDALE a Colorado municipal corporation, By: Michael Hassig, Mayor CONNIE F. HICKS Zn--• /t( acknowledgments on following page TOWN OF CARBONDALE-Hicks-Settlement Agreement Water Service and Pipeline Easement Agreement Town ojCarbondale/Hicks/PC7 Page 12 STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ss. COUNTY OF GARFIELD ) Acknowledged, subscribed, and sworn to before me this/beh day of4/4,nt4,, 2003, by Michael Hassig, duly elected Mayor of the Town of Carbondale, Colorado. WITNESS my hand and official seal. My commission expires: STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ss. COUNTY OF GARFIELD ) 072, coos O.sr�r.i � LQh�c-L�f-J Notary Public Acknowledged, subscribed, and sworn to before me this lCia.day of , 2003, by David W. Hicks, individually and as general partner of P.C.I, L.L.L.P. WITNESS my hand and official sea( My commission expires: MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 04-24-2005 - STATE OF COLORADO ) COUNTY OF GARFIELD ) ss. Notary Public Acknowledged, subscribed, and sworn to before me this « i -,day of y ��— , 2003, by Connie F. Hicks. WITNESS my hand and official seal. My commission expires: MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 04-24-2005 TOWN OF CARBONDALE-Hicks-Settlement Agreement Notary Public • °_ StHMUESER GORDON MEYER @, �!• ENG'NEERS n SURVEYORS 118 w 6Th. SUITE 200 °LENwOOD SPRINGS, CO 61501 970-945-1004 rx 970945-5945 Town of Carbondale Waterline Easement Hicks Property P O BOX 2155 ASPEN, 00 816 1 2 970-925.6727 FS 970-925 .4157 1 April 2003 93146A-101 P 0 BOX 3056 CRESTED BUTTE CO 81 224 970-3495355 rx 970 349-5356 A strip of land situated in a parcel of land described in Book 869 at Page 615 of the records of the Garfield County Clerk and Recorder in Sections 10 and 15, Township 8 South, Range 88 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian, Counties of Garfield and Pitkin, State of Colorado being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point on a fence line as described in said Book 869 at Page 615 of the records of the Garfield County Clerk and Recorder whence a Garfield County Surveyor brass cap for the witness corner to the northeast corner of said Section 15 bears N30°52' 18"E a distance of 1124.66 feet, with all bearings being relative to a bearing of N00° 27'34"W between said witness corner and a stone at the northeast corner of said Section 10; thence along said fence line N85°23'05"W a distance of 40.00 feet; thence departing said fence line N04°59'49"E a distance of 357.14 feet; thence N01°26'20"E a distance of 316.77 feet; thence N04°33'28"E a distance of 199.37 feet; thence N08°06'25"W a distance of 437.45 feet; thence N07°50' 19"E a distance of 397.16 feet; thence N08°37'21"E a distance of 292.52 feet; thence N06°08'36"E a distance of 103.38 feet; thence N09°36'03"E a distance of 109.15 feet; thence N06°44'00"E a distance of 225.66 feet; thence N07°45'46"E a distance of 353.63 feet to a point on the south line of a parcel of ]and described in Book 699 at Page 160 of the records of the Garfield County; thence along said south line of said parcel of land the following four (4) courses: S83°47'37"E a distance of 16.04 feet; thence N07°17'30"E a distance of 26.83 feet; thence N39° 17'36"E a distance of 26.80 feet; thence N56° 10'52"E a distance of 13.60 feet; thence departing said south line S07°45'46"W a distance of 412.40 feet; thence S06°44'00"W a distance of 226.30 feet; thence S09°36'03"W a distance of 108.94 feet; thence S06°08'36"W a distance of 103.04 feet; thence S08°37'21"W a distance of 293.11 feet; thence S07°50'19"W a distance of 396.98 feet; thence S08°06'25"W a distance of 436.30 feet; thence SO4°33'28"W a distance of 197.04 feet; thence S01°26'20"W a distance of 316.92 feet; thence SO4°59'49"W a distance of 358.12 feet; to the point of beginning, containing 112,743 sq. ft. or 2.588 acres more or less. Q\1993\93146A-011hlcks leg doc cegtecr, April 24, 2002 Prince Creek Construction Attn: David Hicks 1317 Grand Avenue, Suite 101 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical. Int. 5020 County Road 15-1 Glenwood Springs. Colorado 81601 Phone: 970-945-7985 Fax: 970-945-8454 hpgeo@hpgeotech.com Job No. 102 211 Subject: Subsoil Study for Foundation Design and Percolation Test, Proposed Hicks Residence, Lot 7, Prince Creek Estates, 1051 Prince Creek Road, Garfield County, Colorado Dear Mr. Hicks: As requested, Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. performed a subsoil study and percolation test for foundation and septic disposal designs at the subject site. The study was conducted in accordance with our agreement for geotechnical engineering services to you dated March 25, 2002. The data obtained and our recommendations based on the proposed construction and subsurface conditions encountered are presented in this report. Proposed Construction: The proposed residence will be a two story wood frame structure above a garden level basement located in the area of the exploratory pits as shown on Fig. 1. Ground floors are expected to be slab -on -grade. Cut depths are assumed to range between about 4 to 8 feet. Foundation loadings are assumed to be relatively light and typical of the proposed type of construction. The septic disposal system is proposed to be located southwest of the proposed residence. If building conditions or foundation loadings are significantly different from those described above, we should be notified to re-evaluate the recommendations presented in this report. Site Conditions: The proposed building area consists of irrigated pasture located in the western portion of Lot 7 as shown on Fig.1. The ground surface is flat and gently to strongly sloping down to the west with about 4 feet of elevation difference across the proposed building area. The Ella Ditch is located to the east and was not flowing at the time of our site visit. The proposed building area is vegetated with native grass and weeds. Scattered subrounded cobbles were visible on the ground surface near the building site. • • • Prince Creek Construction April 24, 2002 Page 2 Subsidence Potential: Prince Creek Estates is underlain by Pennsylvania Age Eagle Valley Evaporite bedrock. The evaporite contains gypsum deposits. Dissolution of the gypsum under certain conditions can cause sinkholes to develop and can produce areas of localized subsidence. Sinkholes were riot observed in the immediate area of the subject lot. The exploration pits were relatively shallow, for foundation design only. Based on present knowledge of the site, it cannot be said for certain that sinkholes will not develop. In our opinion, the risk of ground subsidence at Lot 7 is low but the owner should be aware of the potential for sinkhole development. Subsurface Conditions: The subsurface conditions at the site were evaluated by excavating three exploratory pits in the proposed building area and one profile pit in the proposed septic disposal area at the approximate locations shown on Fig. 1. The logs of the pits are presented on Fig. 2. The subsoils encountered, below about 1 foot of topsoil, consist of nil to 2' feet of stiff, sandy clay overlying medium dense, silty sand with scattered rock fragments up to cobble size. Results of swell -consolidation testing performed on relatively undisturbed samples of the subsoils, presented on Figs. 3 and 4, generally indicate low compressibility under existing moisture conditions and Light loading. The clay samples from Pits 1 and 2 showed a low expansion potential when wetted. The laboratory testing is summarized in Table I. Foundation Recommendations: Considering the subsoil conditions encountered in the exploratory pits and the nature of the proposed construction, we recommend spread footings placed on the undisturbed natural sand soils below the clay designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of 1,500 psf for support of the proposed residence. Settlements are expected to be relatively minor, on the order of 'h to 1 inch. Footings should be a minimum width of 16 inches for continuous walls and 2 feet for columns. Loose and disturbed soils and expansive clays encountered at the foundation bearing level within the excavation should be removed and the footing bearing level extended down to the undisturbed natural sand soils. Exterior footings should be provided with adequate cover above their bearing elevations for frost protection. Placement of footings at least 36 inches below the exterior grade is typically used in this area. Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span local anomalies such as by assuming an unsupported length of at least 12 feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining structures should be designed to resist a lateral earth pressure based on an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 55 pcf for the on-site soils as H -P GEOTECH Prince Creek Construction April 24, 2002 Page 3 backfill. Floor Slabs: The natural on-site soils, exclusive of topsoil, are suitable to support lightly loaded slab -on -grade construction. The clay soils possess an expansion potential when wetted and there could be some slab heave if the subgrade soils become wetted. To reduce the effects of some differential movement, floor slabs should be separated from all bearing walls and columns with expansion joints which allow unrestrained vertical movement. Floor slab control joints should be used to reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking. The requirements for joint spacing and slab reinforcement should be established by the designer based on experience and the intended slab use. A minimum 4 -inch layer of free -draining gravel should be placed beneath basement floor slabs to facilitate drainage. This material should consist of minus 2 -inch aggregate with less than 50% passing the No. 4 sieve and less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve. All fill materials for support of floor slabs should be compacted to at least 95 % of maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Required fill can consist of the on-site sand soils devoid of clay soils, vegetation, topsoil and oversized rock. Underdrain System: Although free water was not encountered during our exploration, it has been our experience in the area that local perched groundwater can develop during times of heavy precipitation or seasonal runoff. Frozen ground during spring runoff can create a perched condition. We recommend below -grade construction, such as basement areas, be protected from wetting and hydrostatic pressure buildup by an underdrain system. The drains should consist of drainpipe placed in the bottom of the wall backfill surrounded above the invert level with free -draining granular material. The drain should be placed at each level of excavation and at least 1 foot below lowest adjacent finish grade and sloped at a minimum 1% to a suitable gravity outlet or sump and pump. Free -draining granular material used in the underdrain system should contain less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve, less than 50% passing the No. 4 sieve and have a maximum size of 2 inches. The drain gravel backfill should be at least 1'h feet deep. H -P GEOrECH • • Prince Creek Construction April 24, 2002 Page 4 Surface Drainage: The following drainage precautions should be observed during construction and maintained at all times after the residence has been completed: 1) Inundation of the foundation excavations and underslab areas should be avoided during construction. 2) Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density in pavement and slab areas and to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density in landscape areas. Free -draining wall backfill should be capped with about 2 feet of the on-site, finer graded soils to reduce surface water infiltration. 3) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions. We recommend a minimum slope of 6 inches in the first 10 feet in unpaved areas and a minimum slope of 3 inches in the first 10 feet in pavement and walkway areas. 4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill. Percolation Testing: Percolation tests were conducted on March 26, 2002 to evaluate the feasibility of an infiltration septic disposal system at the site. One profile pit and three percolation holes were dug at the locations shown on Fig. 1. The test holes (nominal 12 inch diameter by 12 inch deep) were hand dug at the bottom of shallow backhoe pits and were soaked with water one day prior to testing. The soils exposed in the percolation holes are similar to those exposed in the Profile Pit shown on Fig. 2 and consist of stiff, sandy clay overlying silty sand. Percolation testing was performed in the silty sand soils below the clay. Percolation tests indicate infiltration rates between 10 and 20 minutes per inch with an average infiltration of 14 minutes per inch. The percolation test results are presented in Table II. Based on the subsurface conditions encountered and the percolation test results, the tested area should be suitable for a conventional infiltration septic disposal system. Limitations: This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no warranty either expressed or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the exploratory pits excavated at the H -P GEOTECH • Prince Creek Construction April 24, 2002 Page 5 locations indicated on Fig. 1, the proposed type of construction and our experience in the area. Our findings include interpolation and extrapolation of the subsurface conditions identified at the exploratory pits and variations in the subsurface conditions may not become evident until excavation is performed. If conditions encountered during construction appear different from those described in this report, we should be notified at once so re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes. We are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. As the project evolves, we should provide continued consultation and field services during construction to review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations, and to verify that the recommendations have been appropriately interpreted. Significant design changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommendations presented herein. We recommend on-site observation of excavations and foundation bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a representative of the geotechnical engineer. If you have any questions or if we may be of further assistance, please let us know. Sincerely, HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. Trevor L. Knell Reviewed by: Steven L. Pawlak, P.E TLK/ksw attachments cc: Railton - McEvoy - Attn: Phil McEvoy H -P GEOTECH • • APPROXIMATE SCALE 1" = 200' TO COUNTY ROAD 111 4 ACRE PIT 3 PARCP III P. P NEW BUILDINAI3E 102 211 1 PRINCE CREEK ESTATES LOT 7 PROFILE PR ELLA DITCH APPROXIMATE LOCATION LOT 8 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY PITS AND PERCOLATION TEST HOLES Fig. 1 Depth — Feet 0 5 _ 10 LEGEND: ni 4 , PIT 1 ELEV.= 103' / WC=15.5 DD=103 WC=13.8 00=111 -200-19 • PIT 2 ELEV.= 101' PIT 3 ELEV.= 100' WC=4.7 DD=105 -200=21 WC=15.2 DD=111 PROFILE PIT ELEV.= 98.5' 0 5 10 TOPSOIL; sandy clay, slightly organic, loose, moist, brown. CLAY (CL); sandy, stiff, moist, dark brown, slightly calcareous. SAND (SM); silty, with scattered rock fragments up to cobble size, medium dense, moist, brown. 2" Diameter hand driven finer sample. NOTES: 1. Exploratory pits were excavated on March 25, 2002 with a backhoe. 2. Locations of exploratory pits were coordinated with the client in the field. 3. Elevations of exploratory pits were measured by hand level and refer to Pit 3 an assumed elevation of 100.0'. 4. The exploratory pit locations and elevations should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. 5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory pit logs represent the approximate boundaries between material types and transitions may be gradual. 6. No free water was encountered in the pits at the time of excavating. Fluctuations in water level may occur with time. 7. Laboratory Testing Results: WC = Water Content ( % ) DD = Dry Density ( pcf ) —200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve Depth — Feet 102 211 HEPWORTH—PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. LOGS OF EXPLORATORY PITS Fig. 2 a Compression — Expansion X Compression — Expansion % 1 0 1 2 3 4 1 0 1 2 3 4 • Moisture Content = 15.5 percent Dry Density = 103 pcf Sample of: Sandy Clay From: Pit 1 at 2 Feet Expansion upon wetting 0.1 1.0 0 APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf 100 0.1 1.0 0 APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf 100 102 211 HEPWORTH—PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Fig. 3 Moisture Content = 8.4 percent Dry Density = 107 pcf Sample of Sandy Clay From: Pit 2 at 2 Feet Expansion upon wetting 0.1 1.0 0 APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf 100 102 211 HEPWORTH—PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Fig. 3 t 1 i • Compression % A W N a O Moisture Content = 15.2 percent Dry Density = 111 pcf Sample of: Silty Sand From: Pit 3 at 7 Feet • No movement upon wetting • 1 0.1 1.0 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf 102 211 HEPWORTH—PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Fig. 4 tM N> O 6 Z m 0 1- J—J C.) cc 2 m U u, LU i- H T O o woo Y m ¢ J m a J LL CL O >- ▪ cC o 2 a Go w 2 • SOIL OR BEDROCK TYPE sandy clay • c co 0 > ♦+ N sandy clay II a c (0 CO > Y 0D silty sand II UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH IPSFI ATTERBERG LIMITS LIQUID PLASTIC LIMIT INDEX 1%1 1%1 PERCENT PASSING NO. 200 SIEVE m r N z 0 4 0 G 0 g m ' >_ 0 NATURAL DRY DENSITY Ipcll (Y) 0 111 N 0 in 0 o " Z - O 0 F o is; 13.8 co. v 15.2 SAMPLE LOCATION PIT DEPTH Ilee11 N 7 I N N N r N (Y) Y • • • 1-IEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. TABLE II PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS JOBNO. 102 211 HOLE NO. HOLE DEPTH (INCHES) LENGTH OF INTERVAL )MIN) WATER DEPTH AT START OF INTERVAL (INCHES) WATER DEPTH AT END OF INTERVAL (INCHES) DROP IN WATER LEVEL (INCHES) AVERAGE PERCOLATION RATE (MIN./INCH) P-1 33 10 water added 10 7 1/4 2 3(4 10 7 1/4 5 112 1 3/4 5 112 3 3/4 1 3/4 10 112 9 1 112 9 7 1/4 1 3/4 7 114 6 1 114 6 5 1 5 4 1 P-2 34 10 water added 10 1/2 6 3/4 3 3/4 10 6 3/4 5 1 3/4 5 3 1/2 1 1/2 11 9 1/4 1 3/4 9 1/4 7 1/2 1 3/4 7 112 6 1 112 6 5 1 -1 5 4 1 P-3 31 10 8 71/2 1/2 20 7 1/2 7 1/2 7 6 112 112 6 1/2 6 1/2 6 5 114 3/4 5 1/4 4 3/4 112 4 3/4 4 1/4 1/2 4 1/4 3 3/4 1/2 Note: Percolation test holes were hand dug in the bottom of backhoe pits and soaked on March 25, 2002. Percolation tests were conducted on March 26, 2002. The average percolation rates were based on the last two readings of each test. • KURTZ & ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED Structural Consultants 5012 County Road 154 Phone (970) 945-6305 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Fax (970) 945-1093 FIELD OBSERVATION REPORT NO. 1 TO: Prince Creek Construction 2520 South Grand Ave., Suite 210 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 ATTN: David Hicks THE FOLLOWING WAS OBSERVED: DATE: 06/03/05 PROJECT. Residence at 1051 County Road 111 (Prince Creek Rd) Garfield County, CO. PRESENT AT SITE: 1. Brian Kurtz 2. Mike Fox, Prince Creek Construction The purpose of this site visit was to observe in place structural steel framing for the structure. Framing was essentially complete at the time of my observation. Prior to performing the inspection I reviewed a set of construction documents for the residence as well as a set of supplemental details. Structural steel framing occurs on the main level floor and the upper level floor. There is no structural steel in the roof framing system with one exception: In the west wing of the residence a W 10x 17 upper level floor beam spanning 33'-0" is supported, in part, by two steel pipe column `hangers'. These columns frame into 3 ply roof girder trusses via inverted steel hangers. Note that all structural wide flange beam sizes were verified by filed measuring the beam flange widths and thickness, and the beam depths. All of the steel beam and column sizes, as installed, were as specified. All welds on the project were visually inspected for size, porosity and inclusions. In general, the weld quality on the job appeared to be very good. UPPER FLOOR FRAMING I. I reviewed supplemental details for the steel tube column `hangers' and the girder truss inverted saddle hangers dated 12/06/04. The hanger columns and the saddles were installed in a structurally acceptable manner in accordance with the supplemental details. Field welds were 1/4" fillets as specified, and the saddles bolted to the girder trusses with 10 - 3/4" diameter bolts as specified. II. The upper level floor beam above the garage is a 2 span continuous by 44'-0" long W14 x 26. The intermediate column supporting the W14 is a 3" diameter standard weight pipe column, 2 as specified. The column base plate is 1/2" x 6" x 6". The base plate is punched to accept to four anchor bolts or expansion anchors. M 9 titr bae n obithiSklialasiesinstaliet The base The column was installed without a cap plate. It was welded directly to the . ottom flange of the W14 beam with a 1/4" diameter fillet weld all around. Directly above the column, the W 14 was strengthened each side with a full height stiffener plate 1/4" x 2". The stiffener plates were welded with intermittent 1/4" fillet welds. A quick load analysis verified that the intermittent welds were structurally adequate. III. West of the garage a W12 x 22 upper level floor beam spans north to south and supports two additional steel beams. A W12 x 19 frames square into the W12 support beam, and a W12 x 22 frames into the W12 support beam at an angle of approximately 50 degrees. The `square connection is specified as a `standard frame connection.' The contractor installed a double angle 1/4" x 4" x 4" x 6" high connection. The double angle connection was welded all around with a 3/16" fillet weld. This connection, as installed is structurally acceptable for the given condition. The skewed connection utilized 1/4" thick by 6" high bent plates welded in the same manner. The skewed connection is also structurally adequate. IV. Central to the residence is a two story volume space which is bounded by the circular stairs and the upper level cantilevered balconies. On the east side of this space the cantilevered balcony floor is stiffened with two steel beams. A W8 x 15 steel beam was erected below the cantilever floor joists to act as a `stiff -back' support beam. The W8 is supported, in part, by a W12 x 19 which cantilevers 7'-6" from the adjacent support wall. The W12 is 'in' the plane of the floor joists so that the W8 is `hung' from the W12. A supplemental detail dated 12/06/04 was provided to illustrate the beam - to - beam connection. Between the beams a 2" high section of 4" by 4" tube column was provided. the section of tube column was welded all around with 1/4" fillet welds. The welds appeared to be continuos, as specified, and of good quality. The north end of the W8 was extended by 10" to connect to a cantilevered, double 1.3/4" x 14" LVL beam. The extension consisted of a piece of W12 cut down to 9.1/2". The extension was connected to the end of the W8 with a 1/4" x 4" x 1.1/2" high flange plate, and 1/4" x 2" x 6" high web plates each side of the W8. The flange plate was welded with continuous 3/16" fillet welds, and the web plates were welded all around with 3/16" fillet welds. The top flange of the extension was attached to the cantilevered LVL beam with two 1/2" diameter vertical lag screws. Note that this connection `picks up' a relatively small amount of load, and is limited by the capacity of the lag screws, not the capacity of the welded extension. MAIN LEVEL FLOOR FRAMING I. On the north side of the central stair at the main level a W12 x 19 beam spans east to west approximately 19'-0". At its east end, this W12 beam bears above a wood header. The header is a (2) - 1.3/4" x 9.1/2" LVL (Laminated Veneer Lumber). Based upon a tributary area calculation, the LVL header is structurally adequate to support the W12 beam. II. At the south end of the central bay a W12 x 19 steel beam spans east to west above the south end of the media room. The west end of this beam bears on a built-up post: (3) - 2 x 6 x 3 6'-0" high. The base of this post bears on a single pressure treated 2 x 6 sill plate which is shimmed off of the concrete window sill with three 1" stacks of steel shitostjapendithat the � :i. witmina III. East of the central bay is a two span continuous, by 38'-0" long, W12 x 22 main floor beam. The intermediate support column is, as specified, a 3" diameter standard weight pipe column. Full height stiffener plates 1/4" x 2" are installed each side of W12 beam directly above the pipe column with intermittent 1/4" fillet welds. The column was installed with 1/2" thick cap and base plates. The column is welded to each with 1/4" fillet welds all around. The cap plate is welded all around with a 1/4" fillet weld. All of the welds appeared to be of good quality, and are structurally adequate. The base plate is punched to accept four expansion anchors. 4ktahnitigne IV. South of the previous beam, and near the south exterior wall a W10 x 12 beam spans approximately 16'-0" east to west. The floor joists bear on top of this beam, and the beam bears in a beam pocket in the concrete foundation wall at each end. Maaingimatheiseammatiaiiaamed Intirelmassa1 comanneadtisata AVIO aadattached to the inatilikshe SIRIUS mechanical CONCLUSION The framing, at the time of my observation was substantially complete. It appeared to have been installed in a professional manner, and in accordance with the construction documents. The noted deficiencies are relatively minor, but should, in my professional opinion be addressed as soon as possible. Kurtz & Associates, Inc. Brian J. Kurtz, P. E. oO 1'744 i „ .a • A �y ` o r � �o °� -� 0 0 0 a m o z� P 3_ 52 o 'A OF n �J ` N a 0 , y r i a s m N C.., a, c a to i & v •y t. r . m r 0 3 m o Yr A iPi, e. -.Ts o 0.ip O �I r p 1I N o' o• } ( a to �7.1 70 .ai o ie\ to 7 •t1 a,a i` m r_ N O m 8 PI ppL,,�,i�/ �" Q. 1 O E0 - cm ^ N C CTn ng CO CD D J 1lil S ?1t'• n o �`� 7 C m o 14 h• 7 m 0 v r i A ��y= o 0. o0 g, a U • o s m ft 0 3 1 ^ ato o �A � A o 40 sr. 52 p r a s S m z m S a i G� 3' t C 1 m `o ° N ta a" N © e o t y ~ C CD 1 X( l t o" o F. `' `n a O CO g3 ) • 0 CO a ta 0 3 0g `� 43 °ooG m c n ' �" � m oa ? 0a N oaN oo C \ �1 ' ;e (n o al P (-,--/ ` w ^ u W3 , C' 1 a to 5 e 0 7' `� v R. 21 1 00. 30110N N01133111100 30110N N01103U1t100 COUNTY OF GARFIELD - BUILDING DEPARTMENT COUNTY OF GARFIELD - BUILDING DEPARTMENT 0 0 m 3 --IC O 0 3 C kik' O� m 3 a 0a V' E 3 m a• . m D. a no a 3 Q-. 3 0 5 w 3 m a N A 0 a O o 0 • m m A 3 to N 0 9 O m 7 O 3 C o 4. a co m o g coto A 13 in Cmf o a w When correction(s) have been made, call for inspection at 970-384-5003. • c 7 O 0 a s O' O S 3 O p CD co n f0 O N c 7 N a rtta b 0i'(14-140 -RN 01Q' 0 0 — CD cia 3.n, 3 a -oh co C 7 7 O. y S A O 0 O 0 O G l *' 7 C 0 E A 7 S O O �D N O. A A a 3 z O N je pa;eso( qor e pa;e3o( qor - a 0 CO OD 5 COD o S o O ID (00 V O t0 ° N Er N 00 N p, N 7 fG N 0 O O 0. O 0 GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND SANITATION DEPARTMENT 109 8th Street Suite 303 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Phone (303) 945-8212 INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL PERMIT PROPERTY Owner's Nam System Location /05 1 COI-. ?'7 ?D /1/ C1Q 14 a1ac E Legal Description of Assessor's Parcel No 2 Y� 3- /04 00- 07 /q,0 C. Present Address 7051 / ! // Permit N° 3 9 4 6 Assessor's Parcel No. SYSTEM DESIGN Septic Tank Capacity (gallon) Other Percolation Rate (minutes/inch) Number of Bedrooms (or other) Required Absorption Area - See Attached Special Setback Requirements• Date This does not constitute a building or use permit. Phone 2 30 0797 Inspector FINAL SYSTEM INSPECTION AND APPROVAL (as Installed) Call for Inspection (24 hours notice) Before Covering Installation System Installer Septic Tank Capacity Septic Tank Manufacturer or Trade Name Septic Tank Access within 8" of surface Absorption Area Absorption Area Type and/or Manufacturer or Trade Name Adequate compliance with County and Slate regulations/requirements Other ( nn 1,-, li l�7+'i) RETAIN WITH RECEIPT RECORDS AT CONSTRUCTION SITE Date Inspector C.el,s'z- &M M CONDITIONS: 1. All installation must comply with all requirements of the Colorado State Board of Health Individual Sewage Disposal Systems Chapter 25, Article 10 C.R S. 1973, Revised 1984. 2 This permit is valid only for connection to structures which have fully complied with County zoning and building requirements. Con- nection to or use with any dwelling or structures not approved by the Building and Zoning office shall automatically be a violation or a requirement of the permit and cause for both legal action and revocation of the permit. 3. Any person who constructs,alters. or installs an individual sewage disposal system in a manner which involves a knowing and material variation from the terms or specifications contained in the application of permit commits a Class I, Petty Offense ($500.00 fine — 6 months in Jail or both). White - APPLICANT Yellow - DEPARTMENT No. Job Address r (1 - Assessor's Parcel No:9114;3-Id4 C.;79' Date 5 -,9C3 v� BUILDING PERMIT CARD IC Z C lit 0rt_A C Owner \ t Contractor - IfC Se lt 'j/kacks: Foprl lin F — Soils Test Footing S-27refr - Foundationlsri>` i,; -S-c/G /r.67 - Grout Underground Plumbing f- 1pYU Rough Plumbing %-3=`Y S Framing. % ff L-7-oj- 7-2-7-CiMO- Insulatio /O -&-o Roofing Drywall`' /0-i8= - Gas Piping 1.7-3-b; et..I,) kiptletfHc cm Address MOA ��/—„��N//��V Cy t' -ra4. Address07&a 14 VZ CiJS Rear Phone #r9). ()R!,/7/ Phone # 471151 ys- s RH LH Zoning INSPECTIONS t$ S C TO -t, Weatherproofing Mechanical Electrical Rough (State) ✓ Electrical Final (S ate) Final hecklist o ted? Certificate Occup ncy Date -D-/I-i.cGb Septic System # -5414 Date 5 a1.4 s Final 11116;e0 7;e4 / 0 -Ci& Other NOTES f r McarJ pca G -a9 -os-- i pPin Ce l'xw+.`e✓ (P151. 7-)Z-oS)4— 6/4sente sante. OA”- 4 w 4 -Sr - ws-�- _ r9 . y 5) I. tua` (continue on back) INSPECTION WILL NOT BE MADE UNLESS THIS CARD' IS POSTED ON THE JOB 24 HOURS NOTICE REQUIRED FOR INSPECTIONS BUILDING PERMIT CAARFI LD COUNTY, COLORADO .tt!R' oed Area Permit No. Date Issued..+a�� 101 AGREEMENT In consideration of the issuance of this permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with all laws and regulations related to the zoning, location; construction and erection of the proposed structure for which this permit is granted, and further agrees that if the above said regulations are not fully complied with in the zoning, location, erection and construction of the above described structure, the permit may then be revoked by notice from the County Building Inspector and IMMEDIATELY BECOME NULL AND VOID. Use SiF ow tie FM Amer I GaAs u w Address or Legal Descriptio Owner S% tel Setbacks Front Side Side Rear This Card Must Be Posted So It is Plainly Visible From The Street Until Final Inspection. INSPECTION RECORD Footing _ Foundation - Underground Plumbing 0 -'_Zc-L-/.T_ Insulation"*_u i ,Mg Rough Plumbing ' -'-e 4s Drywall , ,o j.. `Cn_ ., Chimney & Vent Electric Final (by State Inspector !TOM Gas Piping _3.05 ; i. Final _5 -/V -Ob a (- Electric Rough (By State Inspector) Min Septic Final /-g-00 ' G F,4fz Framin: W'c77 p� 7 -Z'1 -o- yan (To include hoof in lace and Windows and Doors installed). Notes: ALL LISTED ITEMS MUST BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE COVERING - WHETHER INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR, UNDERGROUND OR ABOVE GROUND. THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE Phone 3845003 109 8th Street County Courthouse Glenwood Springs, Colorado. APPROVEDDO NOT DESTROY THIS CARD Dated L By Ls. IF PLACED OUTSIDE - COVER WITH CLEAR PLASTIC 7-8.4-1