Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication- Permiti w h Job Addresst-I-D Nature of Work Use of Buildi Owner Contractor Garfield County Building, Sanitation, & Planning Department 108 8h Street, Suite #201 Glenwood Springs, Co. 81601 Office- 945-8212 Inspection Line- 384-5003 NO. X(0 tLn n Building Permit g6/i- COSY, ..�.yn sz,, ► a1 _ act- &D- (--)- . hoz& d`'` � i3Q\-ro • Amount of Permit $ 33R"1.a9 * ( i ata b I I I 0 t 14. 4(1"." (8 yt & OJ&m La.. . 4 U 14•Clerk bcw�a 0,,10.4„A rel-' ,j a �X GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION 108 8° Street, Suite 201, Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: 970-945-8212 / Fax: 970-384-3470 I Inspection Line: 970-384-5003 Permit No: 9 t' G.7efz7 Parcel/Schedule No: 2127aS`1 oQC1( Job Address: c( CQ -� a -XXFrefq Lome_ , 1+ (052- 1 Lot No:wte �dcc( flock No: Subd.1 Exemption:, de ck FI no / /cd- 1►n�f 3�1 Qed-lars orclord 5�bchki isiw4 2 Owner:Address Mit--flares 88e-11 Po 614 L99,Ne.)Csb-ila,ta Ph: 9-10-'184-L4%6 Wk Ph: 710 -984 -CIO 3 Contractor: mSFI Vatlty Gag Nome:. Address: 811041 n. 6w -rig, NewC135511/ La Ph: ono -134- 09Cfj Lic. No. 33o 1 4 Architect/Engineer: SL fetch}d mai.+ws Address: 81tiaI '71,5o.c.r#Or., octoN.(o Ph: 910-qa-I-r19,10 Lic. No. 3o29la 5 Sq. Ft. of Building: 3, totao Sq. Ft. of Lot: 3z`f l$9$S,F, Height: , „ . m,d a1-tV 9tx No. of Floors: cit a. 6 Use of Building:D` �s4 et' 5)61‘i2�AlI% i -%r, sa ba its/ V- 7 Describe Work: (f 0 rt New) 5i4cle corny Lon3 home. 8 Class of Work: %( New o Alteration ❑ Remove ❑ Addition o Move 9 10 Garage:❑ Single aktOkine._4� Double Carport: ❑ Single ❑ Double Tat Drily/ay Permit C -�j On -Site Sewage Disposal Site Plan N/ft — QXefr1PT f (Septic) 11 Valuation of Work: $ 310, tx)O, GC' Adjusted Valuations: 5 17.,g4, 3s1) 12 Special Conditions: Nor4C A092i-V roafaLS ai . ca.& 5-27-04 NOTICEPlan A SEPARATE ELECTRICAL PERMIT IS REQUIRED AND MUST BE ISSUED BY THE STATE OF COLORADO. THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMn1ENCED WITHIN 180 DAYS, OR, IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FORA PERIOD OF 180 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK 15 COMMENCED. 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLETED WITHIN WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULATING CONSTRUCTION OR TH PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTION. �.. n�� �Iec�Fye l.j _ _ Total Fe '� 35233.S9 l e j PeOz�, - - - Dated Permit Issued: /1 � PA/1 � �LL,�O/ OCCGroup: nst. Type: R 3 ,1 , f 1 n[ II - Zoning: Setbacks: Manu. Home: r��„-�sl� IStue ISDS No. & X0003 3�.�Ygot/ �� Fee• j 1 5S. L �1 . ' _ri►l/ %.s.�`7/%//, DE 1 . �. PLN'W»V I TATE � BC. 'APPROVAL/DATE P� (/ AGREEMENT PERMISSION 1S HEREBY GRANTED TO THE AP (CANT AS OWNER, CONTRACTOR AND/0R THE AGENT OF THE CONTRACTOR OR OWNER TO CONSTRUCT THE STRUCTURE AS DETAILED ON PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SUBMITTED TO AND REVIEWED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT, IN CONSIDERATION OF THE ISSSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT, THE SIGNER. HEREBY AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL BUILDING CODES AND LAND USE REGULATIONS ADOPTED BY GARFIELD COUNTY PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GIVEN IN 7018.201 CRS AS AMENDED. THE SIGNER FURTHER AGREES THAT IF THE ABOVE SAID ORDINANCES ARE NOT FULLY COMPILED WITH IN THE LCOATION, ERECTION, CONSTRUCTION, AND USE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED STRUCTURE, THE PERMIT MAY BE REVOKED BY NOTICE FROM THE COUNTY AND THAT THEN AND THERE IT SHALL BECOME NULL AND VOID. THE ISSUANCE OFA PERMT BASED UPON PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA SHALL NOT PREVENT THE BUILDING OFFICIAL FROM THEREAFTER REQUIRING THE CORRECTION OF ERRORS IN SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA OR FROM PREVENTING BUILDING OPERATION BEING CARRIED ON THEREUNDER WHEN IN VIOLATION OF THS CODE OR ANY OTHER ORDINANCE OR REGULATION OF THIS JURISDICTION. THE REVIEW OF SUBMITTED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND INSPECTIONS CONDUCTED THEREAFTER DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ACCEPTANCE OF ANY RESPONSIBILITIES OR LIABLITIES BY GARFIELD COUNTY FOR ERRORS, OMISSIONS OR DISCREPENCIES. THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THESE ITEMS AND IMPLEMENTATION DURING CONSTRUCTION RESTS SPECIFICIALLY WITH THE ARTICTECT, DESIGNER, BUILDER, AND OWNER. COMMENTS ARE (U\f. INTENDED TO BE CONSERVATIVE AND IN SUPPORT OF THE OWNERS INTEREST. Carf m.00J I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT 1 HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE AGREEMENT ABOVE (INITIAL): le a The following items are required by Garfield County for a final inspection: 1. A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector 2. Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department posted where readily visible from access road; 3. A finished roof, a lockable house, complete exterior siding, exterior doors and windows installed, a complete kitchen with cabinets, a sink with hot & cold running water, non- absorbent kitchen floor coverings, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove and refrigerator, all necessary plumbing; 4. A complete bathroom, with washbowl, tub or shower, toilet stool, hot and cold running water, non-absorbent floors and walls finished and a privacy door; 5. All steps outside or inside over three (3) steps must have handrails, guard rails on balconies or decks over 30" high constructed to all 1997 UBC requirements; 6. Outside grading done to where water will detour away from the building; 7. Exceptions to the outside steps, decks and grading may be made upon the demonstration of extenuating circumstances, i.e. weather, but a Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until all the required items are completed and a final inspection made. A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. ****CANNOTOCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (C.O.) IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATING PREMISE UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET. I understand and agree to abide by the above conditions for occupancy use and the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the dwelling under building permit# "it")`3Ge 3/1/o9 BpcontO82002 Date VALUATION/FEE DETERMINATION Applicant rid- 2'F1 Address bP{° (,-.akta, /moi. s(f Date 3-/7.01 Finished (Livable Area): Main /5 34 Upper 722 Lower ) 3 $O Other Subdivision ifs OrcLa�� Lot/Block tRo.c4 3 7 M -f i . b`nl 1 -ti L- j lit ru cs Contractor Total Square Feet 34,35 } G7 25/, 022 Valuation Basement: Unfinished Conversion of Unfinished to Finished Plan Check Fee for Conversion Valuation Garage: Crawl Space: Valuation 9/D Y /O Valuation Decks/Patios: Covered Valuation Open Valuation 344 7/2 Total Valuation /(e, 5241 gzsk, 2P), 3% GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING 970-945-8212 MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS for SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING CONSTRUCTION including NEW CONSTRUCTION ADDITIONS ALTERATIONS and MOVED BUILDINGS In order to understand the scope of the work intended under a permit application and expedite the issuance of a permit it is important that complete information be provided. Adequate and complete information will prevent delays in the plan review process. Reviewing a plan and the discovery that required information has not been provided by the applicant may result in the delay of the permit issuance and in proceeding with building construction. The owner or contractor may be required to provide this information before the plan review may proceed. This causes delays because other plans that are in line for review may be given attention before the new information may be reviewed after it has been provided to the Building Department. Please review this document to determine if you have enough information to design your project and provide adequate information to facilitate a plan review. If you do not, it may be helpful to obtain a book titled "Dwelling Construction under the Uniform Building Code". This book is available to you through this department at our cost. Also, please consider using a design professional for assistance in your design and a construction professional for construction of your project. To provide for a more understandable plan in order to determine compliance with the building, plumbing and mechanical codes, applicants are requested to review the following checklist prior to and during design. Applicants are required to indicate appropriately and to submit the completed checklist at time of application for a permit. 1 • L Plans to be included for a Building Permit, must be on drafting paper at least 18"x24" and drawn to scale. Plans must include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations all sides with decks, balcony, steps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the finish grade line. A section showing in detail, from the bottom of the footing to the top of the roof, including re -bar, anchor bolts, pressure treated plates, floor joists, wall studs and spacing, insulation, sheeting, house - rap, (which is required), siding or any approved building material. A window schedule. A door schedule. A floor framing plan, a roof framing plan, roof must be designed to withstand a 40 pound per square foot up to 7,000 feet in elevation, an 80 M.P.H. windshear, wind exposure B, windload of 15 pounds per square foot, and a 36 inch frost depth. All sheets to be identified by number and indexed. All of the above requirements must be met or your plans will be returned. All plans submitted must be incompliance with the 1997 UBC, UMC and 1997 UPC. 1. Is a site plan included that identifies the location of the proposed structure or addition and distances to the property lines from each corner of the proposed structure(s) prepared by a licensed surveyor and has the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing? Properties with slopes of 30% or greater must be shown on the site plan. NOTE: 106.3.1 (7.) Any site plan for the placement of any portion of a structure within 50 ft. of a property line and not within a previously surveyed building envelope on a subdivision final plat shall be prepared by a licensed surveyor and have the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing. Any structure to be built within a building envelope of a lot shown on a recorded subdivision plat, shall include a copy of the building envelope as it is shown on the final plat with the proposed structure located within the envelope. Yes 2. Does the site plan also include any other buildings on the property, setback easements and utility easements? Please refer to Section 5.05.03 in the Garfield County Zoning Resolution if the property you are applying for a building permit on is located on a comer lot. Special setbacks do apply. Yes 3. Does the site plan include when applicable the location of the I.S.D.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System) and the distances to the property lines, wells (on subject property and adjacent properties), streams or water courses? Yes ✓ 2 4 i1 i 4. Does the site plan indicate the location and direction of the County or private road accessing the property? Yes ✓ 5. Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all reinforcing steel in accordance with the uniform building code or per stamped engineered design? Yes N/ 6. Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl spaces and the clearances required between wood and earth? Yes ✓— 7. Do the plans indicate the size and location of ventilation openings for the attic, roof joist spaces's and soffits? Yes ,/ 8. Do the plans include design loads as required by Garfield County for roof snow loads, (a minimum of 40 pounds per square foot up to & including 7,000 feet above sea level), floor loads and wind oads? Yes 9. Does the plan include abuilding section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor, and roof construction? Yes te 10. Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists, wall studs, ceiling joists, roof rafters or joists or trusses? Yes 11. Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method ofpositive connection of all columns and beams? Yes 12. Does the plan indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the highest point of the building or addition measured at mid span between the ridge and the cave down to existing fundis rbed) grade contours? Yes 13. Does the plan include any stove or zero clearance fireplace planned for installation including make and model and Colorado Phase II certifications or phase II EPA certification? Yes No ✓ 3 14. Does the plan include a masonry fireplace including a fireplace section indicating design to comply with the Uniform Building Code Chapter 37? Yes No 15. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that egress/rescue windows from sleeping rooms and/or basements comply with the requirements of the Uniform Building Code? Yes ✓ No 16. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that windows provide natural light and ve ilation for all habitable rooms? Yes No 17. Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass doors, glazing immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as a walking surface; sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub enclosures and specify safety glazing for these areas? Yes ✓ No 18. Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces, boilers and water heaters indicated on the plan? Yes ✓ No 19. Do you understand that if you are building on a parcel of land created by the exemption process or the subdivision process, are building plans in compliance with all plat notes and/or covenants?/ Yes V No 20. Do you understand that if you belong to a homeowners association, it is your responsibility to obtain written permission from the association, if required by that association, prior to submitting an application for a building permit? If you do not have written permission from the association, do you understand that the plan check fee will not be refunded should the architectur committee deny or reject your building plans? Yes \ No 21. Will this be the only residential structure on the parcel? Yes f No Ifno-Explain: 22. Have two (21 complete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the application? Yes r/ 23. Do you understand that the minimum dimensions a home can be on a lot is 20ft.wide and 20ft. long:/ Yes No 4 24. Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other construction c de requirements? Yes No 25. Do your plans comply with all zoning rules and regulations in the County related to your properties zone istrict? Yes No 26. Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a final inspectionb% the Garfield County Building Department? Yes �/ No 27. Do you understand that approval for design and/or construction changes are required prior to the applica ion of these changes? Yes . No 28. Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a "Plan Review" fee from you at the time of application submittal and that you will be required to pay the "Permit Fee" as well as any "Road Impact" or "Septic System" fees required, at the time you pick up your building pe it? Yes ✓ No 29. Are you aware that twenty-four (24) hour notice is required for all inspections? Inspections will be made from Battlement Mesa to West Glenwood in the mornings and from Glenwood Springs to Carbondale in the afternoons. All inspections must be called in by 3:30 p.m. the day before. Failure to give twenty-four (24) hour notice for inspections will delay your inspection one (1) day. Inspections are to be called in to 384-5003.% Yes \/ No 30. Are you aware that requesting inspections on work that is not ready or not accessible will result in a 547.00 re-inpsection fee? Yes �% No 31. Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the Uniform Building Code including approval on a final inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancyand occupancy of the building? Yes ✓ No 32. Are you aware that the Permit Application must be signed by the Owner or a written authority be given for an Agent and that the party responsible for the project must comply with the Uni rm Building Code? Yes No 5 1 • 33. Are you aware that prior to submittal of a building permit application you are required to show proof of a driveway access permit or obtain a statement from the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department stating one is not necessary? You can contact the Road & Bridge Department 625-8601. t No6 " to l`\ - , kt Var b r k 4 0d8 d,pi a 11916 Yes 34. Do you understand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed Electrician and Plumber to perform installations and hookups, unless you as the homeowner are performing the work? The license number of the person performing the work will be required at timeyf applicable inspection. Yes '/ No 35. Are you aware, that on the front of the Building Permit Application you will need to fill in the Parcel/Schedule Number for the lot you are applying for this permit on prior to submittal of a buildingpermit application? Your attention in this is appreciated. Yes No 36. Do you know that the local fire district may require you to submit plans for their review of fire safety issues? Yes No (please check with the building department about this requirement) I hereby acknowledge that I have read, understand and answered these questions to the best of my ability. Signature of OwnLrr 4.- Date Phone: Q70 - 984 - O 9 09 (days); coo - r1'6`i - L'l5 (evenings) Project Name: Zg Pre y, g(Si el emu_ olio U Project Address: ('r-F�, Lq "Frena ).-.aak Notes: If you have answered "No" on any of the questions, you may be required to provide this information at the request of the Building Official prior to beginning the plan review process. Delays in issuing the permit are to be expected. Work may not proceed without the issuance of a permit. If it is determined by the Building Official that additional information is necessary to review the application and plans to determine minimum compliance with the adopted codes, the application may be placed behind more recent applications for building permits in the review process and not reviewed until required information has been provided and the application rotates again to first position for review, delay in issuance of the permit or delay in proceeding with construction. 31k loo bpminreq 11/2003 6 rasa,) M ,.ki1. VALUATION/FEE DETERMINATION 5.-11o4 Applicant f4-fj 21^-/ Address LarttAZ- . $c 1i Lot/Block -rka 7 Date 3-17.0 Subdivision "els Orckarig MSN , Jal (•e y (j 56414 S Finished (Livable Area): Main /S 3G Upper 7l2 Lower ; 3 $O Other Total Square Feet 34,3S C 9' Valuation Basement: + 2 St " col Unfinished Conversion of Unfinished to Finished Plan Check Fee for Conversion Valuation Garage: Crawl Space: Valuation 9/g Valuation Decks/Patios: Covered Valuation Open Valuation 344 7/2 Total Valuation Contractor Oct g.QA4. 251, 022 2S1 022 �9, 37Z, /4, 5251 4,S)4 $2Sb S2Sb 5511 /5 ChM z,P), 3410 30412/6 ?frig) 3 39909 D PM - 153a Sci so assl Marc and Mary Jaffrey, The Architectural Committee has reviewed the plan for your home to be built on Amended Tract 37 Antlers Orchard Development. Plans have been reviewed based on the following items: Exterior of home to be log and stucco Roof— 50 year architectural shingles in forest green Home to be placed according to site plan submitted with plans Propane tank will be buried No bright exterior yard lights or motion lights on home or property Plans have been approved as received on December 22, 2003. If there are any major changes, plans will need to be resubmitted. Date Date /--e-d$ l- 6--bh' Date 1/747 PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST Date 3• /7. 011 Applicant. rR`-71 Building YEngineered Foundation Driveway Permit ,13urveyed Site Plan -eptic Permit and SetbacksTl44 ✓ Grade/Topography 30% Attach Residential Plan Review List t./Minimum Application Questionnaire Subdivision Plat Notes al. Fire Department Review Valuation Determination/Fees /Red Line Plans/Stamps/Sticker at Attach Conditions /Application Signed L/ Plan Reviewer To Sign Application `Parcel/Schedule No. 440# Snowload Letter- Manf Hms. GENERAL NOTES: Planning/Zoning Property Line Setbacks 30ft Stream Setbacks Flood Plain Building Height Zoning Sign -off Road Impact Fees 1 OA/DRC Approval Grade/Topography 40% Planning Issues Subdivision Plat Notes 02/18/2004 20:40 6258627 ROAD AND BRIDGE PACE 01 Garfield County Garfield County Road and Badge Department February 19, 2004 Mark Jamey Tract 37 CR 237, Antler's Orchard Subdivision Phone: 984-0909 CQ Garfield County Building and Planning Department Dear Mr. Jaffrey, The property on tract 37 on CR 237 in the Antler's Orchard subdivision; already his had a driveway permit issued Therefore, you do not need a pennit for this driveway. If you have any questions or problems, please fed free to contact me. Sincerely, Kraig Kuberry District 2 Foreman Garfield County Road sad Bridge Department P.O. Hoot 426 05117 CR 362 Rias. CO MN Pts 970 676 4401 Pan 9704234627 xubns&us. LOG NOAES INCORPORATED TN Mountain Valley Log Homes dW atkorized Sales Representative" PO BOX 499 325 DRAGONROOT DRIVE. NEW CASTLE CO 81647 (970)984-0909- FAX (970)984-0919 TO 1 Q_Ai Som TIME. COMPANY: ep.)\al,xUl((++tP�t"^`i15 FAX : 3134 — !4-1O FROM. (Mew_ SQ rr--cer`¢ 8 RE: �QtFfey, QAS�.aCSL NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER SHEET: a DATE �J► 10 COMMENTS: PHONE: kinase ctc\ck 4c4w5 letkea #0 -its_ Saccro,6 611 pslmt\ st s„brni Nea ea 31 /b4 • . Ca11 wI o..1 ? s PLEASE CALL ro CONFIRM THE RECEPTION OF THIS FAX: YES NO Cc: T • d 6160-486-0L6 RaJ3,er oJew d02:*0 *0 TO -eW MAR -0i 04 12:28 FR011:KUFNS BROS. 5705601187 T0:970 984 0919 PAGE:02 Kuhns Bros 103 HOMES NCOIPORATED March 1, 2004 To Whom It May Concern: KUHNS BROS. LOG HOMES, INC. INTERNATIONAL CORPORATE r IEAOt]lNR TER5 RR2. BOX 406A • IEWI684.88.2. PA 17837 570-568-1422 • 1 -900 -376 -*44 • FAX 570.5684187 kuriDaiI lekunr6Ums cam • HIV //www.kuhfSbrOS.COrn This is an addendum to the pians that were provided by Kuhns Brothers Log Homes. The insulation requirements uml r -values are as follows: 2x6 stud walls = RI9 2x12 rafered roof •E R38 Pre -fab truss roof = 108 If you have any questions, please contact me at 1-800-326-9614, ext. 366. Thank you, Chris Cleric Asst. Team Leader Engineering Dept. Kuhns Bros Log Homes 390 Swartz Road Lewisburg, PA 17837 Integrity—Quality—Value—Service—It Must lie Kuhns Bros. a - d 6160-686-OG6 %. • tens ..... ,ryJuT.0.0WWM Ra.J,1aer oJeW dra:60 60 to JeW Form No.OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER GWS -25 '� COLORADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 818 Centennial Bldgher ., 1313 Stedman St, Denver, Colorado 60203 I ' ' (303) 866-3581 APPLICANT it Setcce THOMAS LAFRENZ 2000 COUNTY ROAD 237 SILT, CO 81652- (970) 876-1929 PERMIT T CONSTRUCT A WELL p sit . LIC WELL PERMIT NUMBER 239406 - DN. 5 WD 39 DES. BASIN MD Lot 37 Block: Filing: Subdir. ANTLERS ORCHARD DEVELOPMENT CORP APPROVED WELL LOCATION GARFIELD COUNTY NW 1/4 SE 1/4 Section 25 Township 5 S Range 92 W Sixth P.M. DISTANCES FROM SECTION LINES 2490 Ft from South Section Line 2320 FL from East Section Line UM COORDINATES Northing: Easting: ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT CONFER A WATER RIGHT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL. 1) This well shall be used In such a way as to cause no material h$ay to resisting water rights. The issuance of this permit does not assure the applicant that no injury wit oast to another vested water right or preclude another armor of a vested water right from seeldng refref In a civil court action. 2) The construction of this well shall be in wmp1anoe with the Water Wei Construction Rules 2 CCR 402-2, unless approval of a variance has been granted by the State Board of Examiners of Water Wei Construction and Pump Installation Contactors In accordance with Rule 18. A) Approved pursuant to CRS 37-92-002(3)(b)(II)(A) as the only well on a residential ste of 7.957 acre(s) described as tet 37, Antlers Orchard Development Cap (Amended) Subdvisior, Garfield County. 4) The use of ground water from this well Is limited to ordinary household purposes inside one single family dwelling. The ground water shall not be used for irrigation or other purposes. 5) The madman pumping rale of this well shall not exceed 15 GPM. 8) The return flow from the use of this well must be through an individual waste water disposal system of to nonevaporative type where the water is retuned to fix sane stream system in whidi the well is located. 7) This well shall be constructed not more than 200 feet from the location specified on this permti. NOTICE: This permit has been approved for the location as noted above. The permit was approved for 2320 feet from the East NOT the West section line. The orlghnal proposed location did not place the well In the 114, 1/4 identified on the permit appieatlon. Thus the call from the EaeUWest sedan Ins was amended to match the 114,1/4 section. You are hereby notified that you have the rind to appeal the Issuance of this permit, by filing a written request with this office within sixty (80) days of the date of issuance, pursuant to the Slide Admbhielraive Procedures Ad. (See Section 24-4-104 trough 106, C.R.S.) ,p_. e) -N,_ NOTE: Parcel Identification Number (PIN): 23-2127-254.00-071 0 NOTE: Assessor Tax Schedule Number. 008143 !1002 APPROVED DMW nrnn.n-, Stats Engineer 91 ruins) ®r_.._._._._.._ ►IAD 0 1 Wit f, Fop No. GWS -11 3/2003 STATE OF COLORADO OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER 818 Centennial Bldg., 1313 Sherman St, Denver, CO 80203 (303) 866-3581 Fax (303) 866-3589 CHANGE IN OWNERSHIP/ADDRESS':: CORRECTION OF THE WELL LOCATION For Office Use Only :c I V E D 19 134 Er %saunaEs ER 41' Insert the Well Permit Number an LI o Z . Name. address and phone of the person claiming ownership of the well: NAME(S) Mailing Address cay, St. zip Phone (qlO Mat c. R. 'So `he j P. 0 • Box `19 9 NItw Cas\-lt h CD %I t 41 1 q%4 - a,‘ -i$5 This form is filed by the named individual/entity darning that they are the owner of the well pennitled as referenced above. This filing is made pursuant to C.R.S. 37-90-143. WELL LOCATION: County Cr ac -ie I el Owner's Well Designation T. R. IJ. La Fre..h5 Lur (— (Address) (Address) N to 1/4 of the5E-1/4, Sec. 25 Twp. 5 ❑ N. or i. S., (City) Range a ML ❑ E. (State) (Zip) or 0 W., (C+h P.M. Distance from Section Lines ay°l O Ft. 3L O Ft. From E. or ❑ W Line. , Fling/Unit From ❑ N. or 4 S. Subdivision Name Qnh+1tr5 Orchar c\ Lot 3-1 , Block The above listed owner(s) say(s) that he, she (they) own the well d=.,,:,r amended for the following reasons: NChange in name of owner ❑ Correction of location for exempt wells permitted prior to May 8, May 17, 1965. Please see the reverse side for further information regarding bed herein. The existing record is being tg hange in mailing address 1972 and non-exempt wells permitted before correction of the well location. I (we) daim and say that I (we) (are) the owner(s) of the well described above and that the commencement of extraction of ground water from this well, lawfully made under the well permit, occurred on the date indicated, and that the statements made herein are true to my (our) knowledge. Please print the Signer's Name & Title mofc R. 'l ?ity Signature(s) of the new vort,....,� Date It is the responsibility of the new owner of this well to complete and sign the form. Signatures of agents are acceptable if an original letter of agency signed by the owner is attached to the form upon its receipt For Off= Un: Only State Engineer By Date KuhnsBros. LOG HOLES INCORPORATED Mountain Valley Log Homes "Authorized Saks Representative" PO BOX 499 325 DRAGONROOT DRIVE. NEW CASTLE CO 81647 (970)984-0909 FAX (970)984-0919 ro aNay Sc1-II.;a1lt r DATE: '11a1Io4 TIME l� `` COMPANY: Cjo,Altta C0`2+rl,6 FAX 31A 341O FROM: mo c]PHONE: 9y 5 - $ a1 a 1 RE: P t O• `0310 - Stpsoc. Sysst tr. "'teal"' Vi4c -rvyy dw'� x f M l Cyte.'y c r 43A Z. .s • NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER SHEET: tp COMMENTS. aNdy - Pit add 44.4yt +� le also we 00i1% b( subml NLtia Prtm.4 -1 903 1 s C -C(2 , n Charv(AR or IL/ to (tcl q Swcut hoot oVC;.t atoo'Jt gon u1- W -'ch w , 11 c s.-1 gcCS11;0..n.Q S.F. 38i S.F. ,,,,It w! 1 20 S. F. c F 5\"7f07- - h4vt o 30(r J Cl(Cton dcnr hi Tinvs-a A -J toI of ! a . 1+ w111 ha" Ott en4 - r ewlt rnr.ic& about t%�e 8a10 . 1 � wL l( NO+ (v .ct41cd Coo .1 -Kt hou'aQ 0$454- 1\\- rnt1 1(,nu.�J or cv�c !T� Ong a�jp\'ccA. T -or aVIct = w.�� Nub $ro ao -co Sul" rnI kin { CYnI.,' . or dAn — -Ono . Ma r Cr PLEASE CALL TO CONFIRM THE RECEPTION OF THIS FAX: YES ✓ NO Cc: RECEIVED APR 2 2 2004 GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING & PLANNING soono0DI SIKON 901 A311VA MIK 6160686016 XVJ B0 LZ 600ZVLZ/b0 I . J MIS MiTek`' Re: Jaffrey Custom Building Concepts MiTek Industries, Inc. 7777 Greenback Lan Suite 109 Cams Helgtas, CA, 95010 Tebptune SPAM -1900 five 9441676-1909 The truss drawing(s) referenced below have been prepared by MiTek Industes, Inc. under my direct supervision based on the parameters provided by Stock Components-Denver,CO. Pages or sheets covered by this seal: 811693099 thtuR11693100 My Iicrose renewal date fa the state of Colorado is May 31, 2004. -March 24,2004 Yu, Ray The seal on these drawings indicate acceptance of professional mgmeering responsibility solely for the truss components shown. The suitability and use of this component forany particular building is the responsibility of the building designer, per ANSI/TP[-1995 Sec. 2. 900/ZOO S]WOH 901 A311VA NIB 6160D860l6 XVd BO 12 D00Z/12/D0 J I ,bb JUPREY Tow A GXEMOS7 Qty 7 Obck 01000 BwN7.0101e11. CO 240 280 aec 140 pre Colon Reny Cos* RI 1141044 Job Rifles p4RI1 52E4 an 2004 IderT4 141.4144 4t Wel la 141230]124014 Pa41 1444 1742 4M = 4.441 140 a ]84 240 543= '44 140 440 140 1444 1549 17.44 144 5004 art. I. 1$ F. LOADUIO (OW Tat 00.0 TCDI 10 0 SCLL 0.0 RCM 100 *'AC010 2114 Alm Inman 1.15 lumbar llebw 115 Rep 8•••• tea YES Cab UfClV*M65 Te TC 0.71 BC 6i ere 0.511 1010401000) O BFI b Coe) Vr(lL) 1100 74 Venn) 1110 74 H CHU 001 6 4041 400 *7110 1* Lid 200 100 Nl PLATOe BRW MI120 Iowa Wr911t 4010 wBBBR TOP CHORD 2X4SPF M10 D OT CHORD 2 X4 SPF 412 WEBS 2 X4 WWINInd10Td '6iape 2-72 X 4 SPP Ma>. 472 X din M.7 RIACTUNO (644.1 17•1190/0.54. 6=1191Y044 Men Hare 0•-114(I0•0 cab 0) Mea WNO•.212(bbt5as 7).40.212(I01a ar 0) Max Glay4-+2490000 as 264S1244$44 ss 9) FORCES (Ib) - Manwm Ca019s9N aNaseTum Unman TCP CHORD 1.2•-134410, 2J•419110. 14.401140.4-5•-194410 B OT CHORD 144-300.858.74•2881r111 67=-500r1U, Seal:/146 WEBS 2-&-1011235, 2.7.411311.3.740257.4-7&1311.44.1011499 B RACING TOP CHORD 901 CHORD Oh000V0 n 8-0-0 x wr0ne AIgIC c.Amg d1 rads WSW or 0.61ec bracing. ROTES 1) TOR GLA Ne be debgn00 for 91 e40 b001 an~ by 100 mph wank al 26 R above gourd Ineel, Wag 100 pee MO third aft Iced AC 10.0 DR bonen Wed Deed Ii. In M 9104 Ina roof nano r14r 00u4anry COMM Il sndlbn 1 M1CRM0 baking. ink apsura C ASCE 745 we UBCHHd15190 Rota verticals or Crib•Mn soil ery an *and 10 00411. d garcon Sal_ May era npl aepa44a to Mod Teo lark DOL MOWN Is 1 39, and M pa grip Iowa in 93 2) Da 400 abased an SOO see epaBe01901 fife 0m11 31 DlbbMbea ens bas bre Caen coesweesel dna Align. 4) 74I Noe Mit ban dergneal° 100 pd bS 0WMifta ostnenccocurnmisfet any ran 000 lads We TIOR No 160. UBC47. LORD CABS Selland March 24,2004 Q ammo ep»s- ..--•r.• me as raw MI• aetam napaaoaAla4fe1fl fl Maly yob b mite ern Mm Mow CNe.aba nit c WrN Ise 11R` 100pedrran cirri 4nI Dan nWO0JrV c rrnwent nvlk=lrr a&bait m•arllw— doer reamcolona m+Parep-Adan a yr. 1001 -nM AM e/rm. Naay paw • .4. ton .open el t. a''aeaumppnb.. IAA •Ilam., won/ a AA, eaely a.hp cottonn ablb41S r pe 'Mance Mil.41111 lin eeaa.. conedddlibrOl m 414en.Meel ma a b enact moth* masa IrsolOy at laauldrpOS Cr Wer w Nan Gel nm1 Map 1•11aPIOF e(aab llel I..aPbl inrin S11.100rwa DMA an. mw 0010 1111 %ar ada* Ca IM n" 1.,011 CA •101 800/800 DI S3W0H 801 A311VA NIM 6160D860L8 %V3 80 LZ 0002/lZ/00 Ja JAFFREY ,w Vat Trp ATRC 0t 06 Ph 1 Curwn 0uufap Co.tfl a RS's Weal sa ann. SwO,G,ww. CO 64.14 Hao 6'10+ 444 811/62100 51003 Jw 102001 YRS bd.st4. we. YIN 1M 2112y6•22 TOW qp 1 t24•t6 1 1644 t 161^ 22.1.12 26-74 1244 2.11,41 341 et20301 7-1111 4.44.R 12 SPY O 6 64+2* 2l 11 1)13= 303 200 1 6+-14 1194 244 3.114 4-36 16 s-, 1244 5212 14 13 42 12412- 4.4 II aa* 2&1; 164E 12441 •44 2+1' 340 tele= 1 lu Yr (02412). (t.0.T-11,0.2.6L1S05-10 Eclat. I160..10 E4641111p7-110-.jJL1140860.T-01111040.0-7-01 GRIP 1600123 LO4OINC (000 1731 50.0 TCDL 10.0 OCL. 0.0 SCOL 100 SPACING 20-0 P10 s Sena 1 15 Lumbar Imes 1.16 Rio Sha all YES Cam U8C9TVARSIP6 Cil TC 012 15C 012 0 1141 002 S6 IMlr) OFR In (baa VOrKLL) -0614-15 Vs(7l) -0.7114.15 Man) Oa 12 Yah 090 0M0 Na 1116 351 60 Ne PLATES 191/.0 Ware 20210 LIMSER TOP CHORD 2X6 1210 1 OE OOT C/1011D 2 x i OFSPI OP 12501F 2.762 MSS Vona 51S0tl SRAL'O.0 FOP CHORD SOT CHORD WEBS JOINTS e31..lwd orl-1-0ee purl! s. Rg4I 65640 mast MOW re 14-1 pemwwl. 1 Ret 12111NPt 217, 10.12 2 Roma la Ps 4-16,6.16 1 laze .tJW.116 REACT030a (6066) 17.237710.5'6. 12.2477A-54 W. Han 174407114W a..1) LIw 411117t44.604e on. 7), 12•05(b.d ase 6) PONCES (le). Nana Companion/Marian Tribe, TOP CNORO 1.24-10350, 2-34-33550, 34•-75071110. 4-5=0,2112. 54400402. 13-7460402, 1100202 i00.2507r1ie. SA0633350, 20.11•.10650 1-170731, 11.12..1grflD, 14-1114-153/2270.14-1560n441 11-I4.012270, 12-13.01710.11-12.0/721 •.i5.51l 2, 611.-20112. 5-15.011150. &14.001151, 2-1S=187165,10.13 -117172. 2-1S=2304701. 10,14. 256700, 0-14,40/130, 2 17..223340 10.12.-213344 FOT CIIORO YAMS MORS 1)This tam Ir. been SPAM lee 20 6010 mea area 10 WO an rMa a 25Ilea sound Iaw1. 161910 108 1310 100 61010 add 1060 and 10.0 oK bQOeS Oom 023 010 t 11 M gassed sed foil ism en an 0mpaa4 awry II, arena 1 sale Woes. Mn soca C ASCE 7-05 pip UBCW t45R511 M6 male s alb. pat 0197 N was 10 .4N. If 6000144 s'* 'w we nm maid 20 MM las lunar OOL maw w 1.11, 000 015 plats 944 seas Y 1.32 2) Owlgn 10031 WNW an 50.0 011 WSW 0364 aloe 460. 3) UnNYAaa snow at haw Olen aon.fl1ur M Oss671 41 TM as era 5661 magad kr a VOA 0// Wm eat M. lad nanananw,l 661 w7 war *. ado Mr Tao.940. 166, 06C-07 5) Cam Sale ked (SO *4) a ralnexlf 34. &0 411, 614 0) SOarntsd Iles mai-(406 (=O a .4415100 beb0 S 103 1.236 sin (100 pal) w.l.a my 10 Iwm.14-15 IS° Cana) Sada Math 24,2004 NY.aal. mea amp!~- a as s es sae an elan as 5036 masa 51555 ma we way a. belga canes. n. awY•, maw* as anal earl 1260144"or 0,23 6.566 area Weayn Pae,eae w. Dap. Malan 61alma. Y 'manila. H W00% Pere. me war* 660316 Tian . lama •waat a nrtwe .65 w..awl ora memo' ant Mal. .em,. arae 0.440 a aa1.K4w. •aa arta d la wanes arca Frans baja 41 o-wal MAY, 117. .amealryN elaian04401. 0ear asnagloe.r400Ct l 2mtablao<•r cprnb. Mew ea0.fl nen an bay. comae ASO PII41•0013.04 M. 6 A WO eaalau aea0.ln\aa•6o ..craw em ry 4b,a vale 565 aelsa Oleo erre 1 70112100 7..r Gala lel. 11.0. 101 cams mew CA MI MIAOW 900/P00M S3W0H 901 A311VA NIM 6160686016 XV] 60 LZ 000Z/LZ/00 a+ , 5sga 4 J1 1a Q'+3' m o a rona avoglagO 483 m WI m p E (€-ita-i o fi eon• n'_ 5o nr lq2 -mg5 ne n'nOCW0 n• sa p ,PK 7.2 Qn 30« m_ 7:0 -tQ A 0 A II; II o mn a it #02aia aopN Q`g g. z� J:Ra "30 rot Fg :W itg D 3 m N 9667, 97X. 96046. 9511, 9432A tete 19-96' I -0t96 t7-96 '1E-94 n • a 0 n 1 8 5 n 0 m a zn 5 O 0 TOP [HOOD TOP CHORD n A 1 wajsAs 6upagwnp n;n 30 dair ao mg IN %"3 ao 0 Ra ag Oo s; Oa cc Si tba of R. oa �Q Sn Si $0 0 ino O@@@@@fit G n oa Aa la aJ j if pP a go —s c R 3 n 1 3 a 7 11 z t N 900/SOOf01 S3WOH 901 A311YA N1W 61600860L6 %Y3 60 12 000Z/1Z/D0 PUB -26 04 09:51 FROM:KUHNS BROS. 00/2Er2084 07100 5704572312 (3:.6; "[004 14•.5E Ee57724e-z • 5705681187 TO:9709840919 MARIDTTI BLDG PROD DEADLINES ENGtNEERIN PAGE:02 YAM_ oz. PAGE 01 DEI FACSIM1tf TRANSMITTAL CONSULTING ENGINEERS • ENGINEERED WOOD PRODUCTS STRUCTURAL DESIGN §PEGIALIStS To: Marion Bldg, Prod' Attn: Richard Menotti From: Deadlines En ineerin Inc. Pa es: Includin Cover Sheet 3 Date: i3 25 04 Time: 4 PM Sub'ect:3affre Res, Fax: 570-457-2312 Letter/check notched top flange, Roseburg #704 Thank You, Sent by: Jew DEAOUNE9 ENGIN!' BUNG, INC. 1203 MAIN STREET MORRO BA'. , CA 93442 81 5-772-3502 (F) 81.5.772-4070 WWW.DEADLINESENG NEERING.COM INFO@DEADLINESENC. NEERING.COM 1 AUG -26 04 09:51 FROM:KUHNS BROS. 08/2672004 07:03 5704572312 09/25i'<0e4 :4150 easi,24072 e August 25, 2004 5705681187 TO:9709840919 MARIOTTI BLDG PROD CEADLII'E5 ENGINEERIN To Garfield County Building and Planning Dept 108 8th St., Suite 201 Glenwood Springs, CO 81801 RE Jeffrey Residence, 0140 La Frena Lane, Silt, CO 81652 Permit #9036 Roseburg Forest Products #704 PAGE:03 PAGE 02 PAGE 03 CONSULTING Eh SINEEIli DEADLI NES DNian AI POO Thur a1.MISn„rv0 iW OTwCI�w it .ndw e Gentlemen: The enclosed design calculation is to check the notch in the top flange of', Ie existing Roseburg 9 ''A" RFPI-40 I -Joists. As the design shows the notch is in an • rea of low stress and needs no repair Regards, �����'� Aaron M. Reed, PE, MBA 1203 Main Street Morro Bay, CA 93442 • 606.772-3502 • FAX 805-77:4070 www. DeadhneaEngineering tom AUG -26 04 09:51 FROM:KUHNS BROS. 08(26/2004 67:00 Z6, 25'22e4• 1, - a FVoloon 5784572312 Gey"7242'? 5705681187 TO:9709840919 MARIOTTI BLDG PROD DEADLINES ENGINEERIN tem An. Glenwood 910mp. CO Roseburg 0704 r. o FLAWS S Member Dots Joint Application. RagMemberTyp - Continuous Description. Lass Bncins. Moisture Condition: Dry Building Code. UBC Standard Load,Moisture CddIda U700 Gvt 1)240 MS lire Load 40 pet peek ConnaOlbn: Glued A Nadel Member Weight. .0 pe Dad LDed. 10 psi I=i DOL 100'K r _ TO q(E1IV x k —4 MProz. 7/ Ka Nmol PAGE:04 YA(t OJ PAGE 6.2 ot25/o4 3.711>m t of 1 Swings and Reactions so 1 0• .00" Geller 2 610,75" Wall 5 16 6,60'• GIAer Daslen a06ns 6..10.7{' 51075' Product 9 I/7" tF9I-10 10 0 fees 169PI, 35p1( Mod 466.4 Mod woe! need 149 1230 230 1460 13.0'- O.C. Allowable Stress Design Locallen Lw ins C�1p Total w. d 100% Arun' u252 w 16% 6.116' Total lot d 100% Shelf 6.W • 2316 864 Deed I d 1 267.0 110.1 SS% 8 r6' Shelf 497.0r et 1 1 U69er ass• Odd 6PI 4 100% Int. Reaction War .�pef" * S.OM to 10016 LL D4Mofion 49., 7' LI11e1 TL OeNcsal ConVol roar Dalin erwum a repe9We menta' wog i»aes In boors Mir.. r�(oMCAT @ Hot c“ Z2 fE MALLovr = (o. S9%(2353) = [366 > as ry t40 Re -P##[% Rea b onal91D&11011 15 FOR aEPAJI ORLY- nIOTM0LOA0e twe614t00l11 AalrMILD corgrnoo61NF0 PROVIDED WY WHIM- -c,6. t1 FerociAlm WauamUnMle010e112e Ijrp 11 e. a •u alt;.1.1 row WTAa 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 CHURCH & Associates, Inc. ENGINEERS & GEOLOGISTS SOILS AND FOUNDATION INVESTIGATION PROPOSED RESIDENCE AMENDED LOT 37. COMBINED LAFRENZ SUBDIVISION GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO Prepared for: KUHNS BROS. LOG HOMES. INC. ATTN: MARC JAFFREY PO BOX 499 NEW CASTLE. COLORADO 81647 JOB NO. 15779W JUNE 23, 2003 DENVER 4501 Wadsworth Boulevard Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 303.463.9317 Fax: 303.463.9321 TABLE OF CONTENTS SCOPE 1 CONCLUSIONS 1 PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION 1 SITE CONDITIONS 2 INVESTIGATION 2 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 2 SITE PREPARATION 3 EXCAVATIONS 4 BUILDING FOUNDATIONS 4 SLAB -ON -GRADE CONSTRUCTION 5 LATERAL LOADS AND SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE 6 SURFACE DRAINAGE 6 LIMITATIONS 7 FIGURE 1 -SITE PLAN AND LOCATIONS OF EXPLORATORY TEST PITS FIGURE 2 - LOGS OF EXPLORATORY TEST PITS FIGURES 3 AND 4 - GRADATION ANALYSIS TEST RESULTS APPENDIX A - IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT THE REPORT APPENDIX B - TYPICAL FOUNDATION DRAIN DETAILS SCOPE This report presents the results of a soils and foundation investigation for the proposed residence to be located at Amended Lot 37. Combined LaFrenz Subdivision, in Garfield County, Colorado. The purpose of our investigation was to evaluate subsurface conditions and provide geotechnical recommendations for the proposed construction. The report presents a description of subsurface conditions encountered at the site, recommended foundation system, and design and construction criteria influenced by the soils and bedrock. The report is based on data developed during the field and laboratory investigations and our experience. A summary of our findings and recommendations is presented below. CONCLUSIONS 1. Subsurface materials encountered in the test pits (TP) consisted of 8 to 16 inches of slightly, clayey. silty, sandy topsoil, overlying loose to medium dense, occasionally clayey, silty sand with gravel and cobbles to the maximum explored depths of 4.3 feet in TP -1, 8.3 feet in TP -2, and 5 feet in TP -3. Bedrock was not encountered in any of the test pits. 2. Free water was not encountered in the test pits during excavation. Based on our observations, ground water should be below the foundation levels during construction. 3. The residence can be constructed with a spread footing foundation system on the native sandy soil. The spread footing foundation system will have a low risk of movement due to expansive or collapsible soils. Design and construction criteria are presented in the body of the report. 4. Slab -on -grade construction on the sand will have a low risk for movement due to expansive soils. For slab -on -grade construction, slabs should ideally be constructed as "floating" slabs. The slabs should be free to move in the vertical direction. 5. Positive drainage down and away from all foundation walls should be established and maintained at all times. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION A residence with an attached garage and partial basement is proposed for the site. The residence will be of concrete and wood frame construction and light to moderate construction loads are antictpated. It is understood that the residence will have both a structural floor over a crawl space and a partial Soils and Foundation Investigation Job No 15779W Page 2 basement. Detailed house plans were not available when this report was prepared. Approximate foundation depths ranging from 3 to 8 feet below the existing ground surface elevation was assumed for this investigation. A Site Plan showing the location of the exploratory test pits is included as Figure 1. SITE CONDITIONS The site is located in a rural -residential area north of Silt in Garfield County, Colorado. The building envelope is located in the east central portion of the parcel. The ground surface has an approximate 5 percent slope to the southwest. The ground surface in the building area has a dense cover of irrigated hay. An outcrop of sandstone bedrock was located east of the building envelope on a low hill. It is understood the parcel has been regularly irrigated for several years. INVESTIGATION Subsurface conditions were investigated on June 10, 2003 by excavating three exploratory test pits at the locations presented on Figure 1. The test pits were excavated with a John Deere 310D rubber - tired backhoe. Hand drive samples were obtained at selected intervals for laboratory testing. Penetration testing to determine the consistency or relative density of the soils was not performed, but based on observations of the test pit excavations, the soils appeared to be generally loose to medium dense. Logs of the soils encountered are presented on the Logs of Exploratory Borings. Figure 2. Samples were returned to the laboratory where they were visually classified and testing was assigned to evaluate the engineering properties of the soil. Laboratory testing consisted of moisture - density determinations, gradation analyses, and a material passing the No. 200 sieve analysis. The results of the laboratory testing are presented on Figures 2 through 4. Soils and Foundation Investigation Job No 15779W Page 3 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Subsurface materials encountered in the test pits (TP) consisted of 8 to 16 inches of slightly clayey, silty, sandy topsoil, overlying loose to medium dense, occasionally clayey, silty sand with gravel and cobbles to the maximum explored depths of 4.3 feet in TP -I, 8.3 feet in TP -2, and 5 feet in TP -3. Bedrock was not encountered in any of the test pits. Free water was not encountered in either test pit during excavation. Based on our observations, ground water should not within the depth of excavation during construction. Additional subsurface details are presented on Figure 2. The geotechnical practice in Colorado uses a relative scale to evaluate swelling potentials. When the sample is wetted under a surcharge pressure of 1000 pounds per square foot (PSF), the measured swell is classified as low, moderate, high. or very high. It is important to note that measured swell is not the only criteria for slab -on -grade recommendations and additional factors are considered by the geotechnical engineer when evaluating the risk for slab -on -grade and foundation construction. Based on the granular nature of the sandy soil, the swell risk is assumed to be nil to low for this property. Additional information regarding geotechnical risk is included as Appendix A. SITE PREPARATION Organic material and debris should be removed from the foundation area and wasted off site or used for non structural purposes. Any required structural fill should be placed in 8 -inch uncompacted thickness lifts and compacted to 95 percent of the standard Proctor maximum dry density (MPD) within 2 percent of the optimum moisture content. Structural fill is a non -expansive material that classifies as sand according to the Unified Soil Classification System possessing a silt and clay fraction less than 35 percent, a liquid limit less than 40 and a plasticity index less than 20. The onsite soil is suitable for use as structural fill. Structural fill should be placed as recommended above. Any soils loosened by the excavation or forming process should be removed from the footing Soils and Foundation Investigation Job No. 15779W Page 4 areas prior to placing concrete or compacted as recommended above. A geotechnical engineer should review earthwork placement activities. EXCAVATIONS Excavations should not remain open for extended periods of time, permitting wetting or drying of the bearing materials. Moisture changes of the bearing materials may increase the risk for movement. The materials encountered within the depth of excavations are categorized as Type C according the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Based on published OSHA guidelines. the temporary excavations in the Type C soils can have a maximum temporary slope of 1.5:1 horizontal:vertical (H:V). or 34 degrees. This inclination is reasonable for the conditions at the site. Exceeding this inclination will increase the chance of deformation, especially over a long time period. Some localized deformation of the bank may occur, especially during wet weather. loading or with vibrations. Care should be taken when working near the sides of the excavation at all times, and the slopes should be monitored by onsite personnel during construction for evidence of sloughing, bulging or toppling of the sidewalls or cracking at the ground surface. Surcharge loading at the top of the cut by equipment, materials. or vehicles must be avoided, since surcharge loading will increase the risk of caving. Spoils of the excavation must be placed a minimum of 2 horizontal feet from the edge of the excavation. A geotechnical engineer should observe the completed excavation prior to foundation installation. BUILDING FOUNDATIONS The soils at the anticipated foundation elevations of 3 to 8 feet below the ground surface consist of silty sand with gravel and cobbles. The proposed residence can be constructed with a spread footing foundation system founded on the native sandy soil. The footings should be designed for a maximum 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Soils and Foundation Investigation Job No 15779W Page 5 allowable soil bearing pressure of 2.000 PSF. A spread footing foundation system should be designed and constructed to meet the following criteria. 1. All footings must be supported by the native sandy soils. Soils loosened by the excavation or forming process should be removed from the footing areas prior to placing concrete. If structural fill is required below foundations, it should be placed as detailed above in the Site Preparations section of this report. The footing excavations should be observed by a geotechnical engineer to confirm footings are supported by suitable material. 2. Recommended minimum footing widths should be at least 18 inches for continuous footings, and 24 inches square for concrete pads, which support columns. Larger sized footings may be necessary depending on the load of the structure. 3. Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced to span local anomalies in the subsoil. A minimum reinforcement of at least two, No. 5 grade 60 bars top and bottom in all foundation walls is recommended; however, steel reinforcement should satisfy the structural plans. Walls should be reinforced to span an unsupported length of 10 feet. 4. Footings must be protected from frost action. Footings should be covered with a minimum of 3 feet of soil for frost protection. SLAB -ON -GRADE CONSTRUCTION The silty sand encountered at the site is suitable for support of slab -on -grade construction with a low risk of movement due to expansive soils. The slabs should ideally be constructed as "floating" slabs, which are free to move in the vertical direction. The slabs should not be attached to interior or exterior bearing members. If needed for lateral resistance or other reasons, slabs can be connected to the foundation walls, with a low risk of cracking or movement. If fill soils are used. a structural fill should be used and compacted and placed as detailed in the "Site Preparations" section of this report. The following design and construction details are recommended for slab -on -grade construction. 1. Slabs should be separated from exterior walls and interior bearing members. Vertical movement of the slabs should not be restricted. Using brittle floor finishes, such as tile, has an increased risk of movement and performance expectations should be reviewed prior to use. 2. Slab bearing partitions should be minimized. Where such partitions are necessary, a slip joint should be constructed to allow free vertical movement of the partitions. Slip joints should allow at least 1 inch of vertical movement in both directions. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Soils and Foundation Investigation Job No. 15779W Page 6 3. Underslab plumbing should be eliminated where feasible. Where such plumbing is unavoidable it should be thoroughly pressure tested during construction. 4. Plumbing and utilities, which pass through the slab, should be isolated from the slab. 5. If a forced air heating system is used and the furnace is located on the slab, we recommend provision of a collapsible connection between the furnace and the duct work. LATERAL LOADS AND SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE Below grade walls must be designed for lateral loads. For "active" conditions, the walls should be designed for an equivalent fluid pressure of 35 pounds per cubic foot (PCF). For "at rest" conditions. an equivalent fluid pressure of 45 PCF should be used. These loads do not include hydrostatic loads or surcharge loads such as sloping backfill or vehicles. A basement foundation drain around the perimeter of the structure should be installed. The foundation drain will reduce the risk of "wet basement" problems and development of hydrostatic pressures. The foundation drain should lead to a positive gravity outlet or to a sump where water can be removed by pumping. The foundation drain should be installed similar to the details presented in Appendix B. SURFACE DRAINAGE The risk for wetting of foundation soils can be reduced by carefully planned and maintained surface drainage. We recommend the following precautions be observed during construction and be maintained at all times after the structures are completed. 1. Excessive wetting or drying of open foundation excavations should be avoided as much as possible during construction. 2. Backfill at foundation walls should be moistened and compacted. Ani settlement of backfill after completion of the structure should be immediately filled and positive drainage reestablished. 3. The ground surface surrounding the structure should be sloped to drain away from the structure. A minimum slope of 12 inches in the first 10 feet should be maintained. A 5 to l0 -foot zone adjacent to the residence should not be irrigated. 1 1 1 1 Soils and Foundation Investigation Job No 15779W Page 7 4. Roof downspouts and drains should discharge to the ground surface well beyond the limits of all backfill. 5. Plastic membranes should not be used to cover the ground surface surrounding the structure. These membranes can trap moisture and prevent normal evaporation from occurring. Geotextile fabrics are a suitable option to control weed growth and allow some evaporation. LIMITATIONS Although the test pits were located to obtain a reasonably accurate determination of foundation conditions, variations in the subsoil conditions are possible. Our firm should be contacted if conditions different from those described are encountered in the excavations. Excavations should be observed by a representative of our firm. The cost of construction observations is not included in this investigation. An ' environmental assessment of the property is outside our scope of work for this project. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 If we can be of further service in discussing the contents of this report, or in the analysis of the influence of subsurface conditions on the design of the structures, please call. CHURCH & Associates, Inc. C. Steven Compton Project Geologist MJV/csc 3 copies sent Reviewed by Mark J. Vessely, P. Geotechnical Group b 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 PROPOSED RESIDENCE AMENDED LOT 37, COMBINED LAFRENZ SUBDIVISION GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO -TF-3 STP -2 STP -I SITE PLAN AND LOCATION OF TEST PITS ' JOB NO. 15779W FIGURE 1 SCALE 1" = 200' N uJ w w w w w 0 TP -1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 EXPLANATIONS Di WC= 12 2 DD = 95 -200= 28 TP -2 �1 WC= 14 3 /JDD=95 -200= 35 i TP -3 ® TOPSOIL, SAND, FINE GRAINED, SILTY, SLIGHTLY CLAYEY, MOIST rWC= 157 /TDD=103 -200= 38 SAND, SILTY OCCASIONALLY CLAYEY, FINE TO MEDIUM GRAINED, WITH GRAVEL AND COBBLES, MOIST TO VERY MOIST, BROWN, PROBED LOOSE TO MEDIUM DENSE INDICATES THAT A HAND DRIVEN SAMPLE WAS COLLECTED NOTES' 1 THE EXPLORATORY TEST PITS WERE EXCAVATED ON 6-10-2003 USING A JOHN DEERE 310D BACKHOE 2 NO FREE WATER WAS ENCOUNTERED AT THE TIME OF EXCAVATION 3 WC = WATER CONTENT(%) DD = DRY DENSITY (PCF) -200 = PERCENT OF FINES PASSING THE NUMBER 200 SIEVE LOGS OF EXPLORATORY TEST PITS JOB NO. 15779W 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 FIGURE 2 w w w 1- C L 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Percent Passing CHURCH & Associates, Inc. Engineers & Geologists Denver Metro Colorado 303-463-9317 Pine Junction / Evergreen Colorado 303-816-1455 Castle Rock, Colorado 303-660-4358 Loveland, Colorado 970-663-2124 100 0 90 0 80 0 70 0 600 50 0 40 0 30 0 Gradation Test Results 4200 4100 850 430 416 68 84 318" 3i4" I-112" ! ' 20 0 100 00 001 01 1 ,0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 t— —r' 80 i. 90 i1 I' i 100 Diameter of Particle in NI Ilimeters 10 DESCRIPTION Gravel, very sandy clayey, moist, brown, some eravel, calcareous GRAVEL 37% HOLE / SAMPLE TP -1 SAND 35% DEPTH 38" FINES 28% LIQUID LIMIT N/A MOISTURE 12.2% PLASTICITY INDEX NIA DRY DENSITY (pcf) 95 DATE: JOB NAME. 6/23/03 Lot 37. LaFrenz 100 JOB NUMBER: 15779 FIGURE 3 Iii 1j,• . I i 1 _._4[ II 111 - li r f F r 20 0 100 00 001 01 1 ,0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 t— —r' 80 i. 90 i1 I' i 100 Diameter of Particle in NI Ilimeters 10 DESCRIPTION Gravel, very sandy clayey, moist, brown, some eravel, calcareous GRAVEL 37% HOLE / SAMPLE TP -1 SAND 35% DEPTH 38" FINES 28% LIQUID LIMIT N/A MOISTURE 12.2% PLASTICITY INDEX NIA DRY DENSITY (pcf) 95 DATE: JOB NAME. 6/23/03 Lot 37. LaFrenz 100 JOB NUMBER: 15779 FIGURE 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Percent Passing • 1000 90 0 800 70 0 60 0 50 0 400 300 20 0 100 00 CHURCH & Associates, Inc. Engineers & Geologists Denver Metro Colorado 303-463-9317 Pine Junction / Evergreen Colorado 303-816-1455 Castle Rock, Colorado 303-660-4358 Loveland, Colorado 970-663-2124 Gradation Test Results #200 #100 #50 #30 #16 08 #4 3/8" 3!4" 3" 001 01 Diameter of Particle in Millimeters I0 DESCRIPTION Sand, very clayey, gravelly, moist, brown, calcareous GRAVEL 15% HOLE / SAMPLE TP -2 SAND 50% DEPTH 7' FINES 35% LIQUID LIMIT N/A MOISTURE 14.3% PLASTICITY INDEX N/A DRY DENSITY (pcf) 95 DATE 6/23/03 JOB NAME: Lot 37 LaFrenz JOB NUMBER: 15779 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 100 FIGURE 4 Pei cent Reiained 40_1_1 - I 1 l ! EI [ r I I L 1' i hI 1 I ii1L. { l 1 1 t 001 01 Diameter of Particle in Millimeters I0 DESCRIPTION Sand, very clayey, gravelly, moist, brown, calcareous GRAVEL 15% HOLE / SAMPLE TP -2 SAND 50% DEPTH 7' FINES 35% LIQUID LIMIT N/A MOISTURE 14.3% PLASTICITY INDEX N/A DRY DENSITY (pcf) 95 DATE 6/23/03 JOB NAME: Lot 37 LaFrenz JOB NUMBER: 15779 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 100 FIGURE 4 Pei cent Reiained Appendix A Important Information About The Report The data collected by Church & Associates during this investigation was used to provide geotechnical information and recommendations regarding subsurface conditions on the site investigated. the effect of those conditions on the proposed construction, and the foundation type for the named client. The stratification lines indicated on the boring log are approximate, and subsurface conditions encountered during construction may differ from those presented herein. This uncertainty cannot be eliminated because of the many variabilities associated with geology. For example, material and engineering characteristics of soil and bedrock may change more gradually or more quickly than indicated in this report, and the actual engineering properties of non -sampled soil or rock may differ from interpretations. Quantitative conclusions regarding the performance of geotechnical structures prior to construction are not possible because of the complexity of subsurface conditions. Rather, engineering judgments and experience are used to estimate likely geotechnical performance and provide the necessary recommendations. Put another way, we cannot be sure about what is not visible, so the collected data and our training and experience are used to develop predictions and recommendations. There are no guarantees or warranties implied or expressed. The owner and/or client must understand that uncertainties are associated with geotechnical engineering, and they. the owner and/or client, must determine the level of risk they are willing to accept for the proposed construction. The risks can be reduced, but not eliminated, through more detailed investigation, which costs more money and takes more time, and through any appropriate construction which might be recommended as a result of that more detailed investigation To reduce the level of uncertainty, this report was prepared only for the referenced client and for the proposed construction indicated in the report. Unless authorized by Church & Associates in writing, the owner will assume additional geotechnical risk if this report is used for any construction that differs from that indicated in the report. Our firm should be consulted well before changes in the proposed construction occur, such as the nature, size, configuration, orientation, or location of any improvements. Additionally, the knowledge and experience of the local geotechnical practice is continually expanding and it must be understood the presented recommendations were made according to the standard of practice at the time of report issuance. If the construction occurs 1 or more years after issuance of the report, the owner and/or client should contact our firm to determine if additional investigation or revised recommendations would be advisable. Post -construction landscaping and owner maintenance will greatly affect structures on expansive or collapsible soils and bedrock. Typically, irrigated landscaping increases the soil moisture content above the pre -construction water content. Slabs, pavements, and structures significantly reduce evaporation of soil moisture. Therefore, post -construction soil movement and resulting damage to buildings and other improvements are likely to occur on sites with expansive or collapsible soils because of the high probability that subsurface moisture content will increase as the property and surrounding area is developed. Poor owner maintenance, such as negative slopes adjacent to foundation walls and irrigated landscaping adjacent to the foundation, also will significantly increase the risk of damage from soil movement. The property owner, and anyone he or she plans to sell the property to. must understand the risks associated with construction and also must assume responsibility for maintenance of the structure. 10 MIRAFI 140N OR EQUIVALENT GEOTEXTILE FABRIC BACKFILL 6"-8" MIN. CLEAN WASHED GRAVEL 4 -INCH DIAMETER PERFORATED PVC PIPE MINIMUM SLOPE OF 1/8" PER FOOT FOR RIGID PIPE MINIMUM SLOPE OF 1/4" PER FOOT FOR FLEXIBLE PIPE WALL • POLYETHYLENE SHEETING • i SLAB INSTALL DRAIN ABOVE LINE 12" MIN NOTES: I. DRAIN PIPE SHOULD LEAD TO SUMP OR POSITIVE GRAVITY DISCHARGE. 2. COVER GRAVEL COMPLETELY WITH GEOTEXTILE IN SANDY OR SILTY SOILS. 3. BOTTOM OF DRAIN SHOULD BE A MINIMUM OF 12 INCHES BELOW TOP OF SLAB AT HIGH POINT. 4. GRAVEL SPECIFICATIONS: CLEAN WASHED GRAVEL, 100% PASSING 1.5", 60-100% RETAINED #4, <3% PASSING #200 TYPICAL EXTERIOR BASEMENT WALL DRAIN 10 BACKFILL WALL • • SLAB INSTALL DRAIN - ABOVE THIS LINE °Q°Q D D fit ff c:4 p0QQQQ 12 MIN T 4 -INCH DIAMETER PERFORATED PVC PIPE MINIMUM SLOPE OF I/8° PER FOOT FOR RIGID PIPE MINIMUM SLOPE OF I/4" PER FOOT FOR FLEXIBLE PIPE NOTES: I. DRAIN PIPE SHOULD LEAD TO SUMP OR POSITIVE GRAVITY DISCHARGE. 2. COVER GRAVEL COMPLETELY WITH GEOTEXTILE IN SANDY OR SILTY SOILS. 3. BOTTOM OF DRAIN SHOULD BE A MINIMUM OF 12 INCHES BELOW TOP OF SLAB AT HIGH POINT. 4. GRAVEL SPECIFICATIONS: CLEAN WASHED GRAVEL, 100% PASSING 1.5", 60-100% RETAINED #4, <3% PASSING #200 TYPICAL INTERIOR BASEMENT WALL DRAIN GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND SANITATION DEPARTMENT 109 8th Street Suite 303 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Phone (303) 945-8212 INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL PERMIT PROPERTY Owner's Naff MWIC it / l l . Present Atl otwi System Location r Permit N° 3911 Assessor's Parcel No. This does not constitute a building or use permit. MCI dress\ JI f\��Ch 1+00 Phone9t Qq - Benz Lr \ ISL' ' `-1$�-p9tiq Legal Description of Assessor's Parcel No SYSTEM DESIGN �1ni-\.eysOrcharry aa1-a Septic Tank Capacity (gallon) Other Percolation Rate (minutes/inch) Number of Bedrooms (or other) Required Absorption Area - See Attached Special Setback Requirements Date Inspector FINAL SYSTEM INSPECTION AND APPROVAL (as installed) Call for Inspection (24 hours notice) Before Covering Installation System Installer Septic Tank Capacity Septic Tank Manufacturer or Trade Name Septic Tank Access within 8" of surface Absorption Area Absorption Area Type and/or Manufacturer or Trade Name Adequate compliance with County and State regulations/requirements OtherhitbrAlyn ,Q. -e7 yn cilt VO y' Date Inspector Utca CL„ -A P E� C. .� RETAIN WITH RE EIPT RECORDS AT CONSTRUCTION SITE *CONDITIONS : ` ' GI-4N`l'_. oy 1. All installation must comply with all requirements of the Colorado State Board of Health Individual Sewage Disposal Systems Chapter 25, Article 10 C.R.S. 1973, Revised 1984. 2. This permit is valid only for connection to structures which have fully complied with County zoning and building requirements. Con- nection to or use with any dwelling or structures not approved by the Building and Zoning office shall automatically be a violation or a requirement of the permit and cause for both legal action and revocation of the permit. 3. Any person who constructs.alters, or installs an individual sewage disposal system in a manner which involves a knowing and material variation from the terms or specifications contained in the application of permit commits a Class I, Petty Offense ($500.00 fine —6 months in jail or both). White - APPLICANT Yellow - DEPARTMENT • COUNTY OF GARFIELD - BUILDING DEPARTMENT CORRECTION NOTICE 108 8th St., Suite 201 Glenwood Springs, Colorado Phone (970) 945-8212 014D 24 Job located atCEM 7 Permit No. x'031. I have this clay inspected this structure and these emises and found the tf��� g& ollowi g correction�,lteeded: gilli-C44 ;tizAj -, J aI t& Jc You are hereby notified that the above correction must be inspected before covering. When correction(s) have been made, call for inspection at 970-384-5003. Date D 19 Building Inspector Phone (970) 945-8212 20 INSPECTION WILL NOT BE MADE UNLESS THIS CARD IS POSTED ON THE JOB 24 HOURS NOTICE REQUIRED FOR INSPECTIONS BUILDING PERMIT ////GA[��RFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO Date Issuet' ............Zoned Area Permit No `1.0. / AGREEMENT In consideration of the issuance of this permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with all laws and regulations related to the caning, location; construction and erection of the proposed structure for which this permit is granted, and further agrees that if the above said regulations are not fully complied with in the zoning, location, erection and construction of the above described structure, the permit may then be revoked by notice from the County Building Inspector IMM LATELY BECOME NULL AND VOID. Use 5 on /l1r%at a a i,'4Citheaksob Add Description©N0 I ,�; J1 r 4 1 This Card Must Be Posted So It is Plainly Visible From The Street Until Final Inspection. INSPECTION RECORD Footing 3 z3 01/2.:‘, %Jt '00,, •-7-0 PI Underground Plumbing y-7_Otlr j __ Insulation $ •240 -'D nail Rough Plumbing 1r.0 MIMI. Drywall -5-p Zeitall Chimney & • ent t _ if . 0 ,% Electric Final (by State Ins . - tor) - Gas Piping •i Ilin =re-ko Ltd Electric Rough (By State Inspector)13a •A Septic Final / -0 srlillna Framing# r ! ' (To include Roof in pla ,yrand indows and Doors installed). 8-0 .� Notes D ' L �' ' ALL LISTED ITEMS MUST BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE COVERING - WHETHER INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR, UNDERGROUND OR ABOVE GROUND. THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE Phiiitagair 109 8th Street County Courthouse Glenwood Springs, Colorado. APP ' OVEDDO NOT DESTROY THIS CARD Da - .i ► By /41 IF PLACED OUTSIDE - COVER WITH CLEAR PLASTIC