HomeMy WebLinkAbout6.0 Satisfaction of a PP Condition-
=-ei= DREXEL, BARRELL & CO
---
E7r1E Engineers - Surveyors
-t-L---7rrr-\rr-7-.\.r7-R
18OO 38th Street
Boulder, Colorado 80301
(303) 442-4338
(303) 442-4373 FAX
To:Garfield Cou Planni and Buildin
108 8 Street Suite 401
Glenwood Sprinqs, CO 81601
Attention:
Project No.:
Project Name:
Telephone No:
Fred Jarman
E5875
TCI Lane Ranch
970-945-8212
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
DATE: 1l13l1o
SUBMITTED VIA:
CARRIER tr
MAIL u
OVERNIGHT U
EMAIL
OTHER: hand deliver x
THESE ARE
TRANSMITTED FOR:
YOUR INFORMATION
YOUR APPROVAL
AS REQUESTED
YOUR PROCESSING x
OTHER:
1-,i
I
WE ARE SENDING YOU
f rrints
! vtytars
E Submittals
tr
trtr
PDF Files
DWF Files
DWG Files
Repoft
Compact Disc
Other: See below
ct -i -.'1
JA)\ " r i':'t
Copies Drawing # or
Pages
Description
2 Access Permit for you signature
2 Attachments for access rmit
1 CD with Permit and draft cover letter
1 envel e addressed to CDOT
REMARKS:
Fred,
Per my telephone message, we have completed the access permit application documentation for TCI
Lane Ranch access improvements to CR100/SHB2.
I have included a draft cover letter to CDOT on the enclosed CD. Please put on Garfield County
letterhead (edit as you see fit) and send along with the access permit and attacments to CDOT.
lf you have any questions, please do not hestitate to call Ann Bowers or myself at the above number.
Thanks!
cc: Jon Fredericks
H:\E5875\Correspondence\Trans-_o 1 1 31 0 jarman access permit.doc
11131109'.27 AM
Signed
Jim Brzostowicz
tr
.:J,.
T
trx
lssuing authority aPPlication
acceptance date:DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
STATE HIGHWAY ACCESS PERMIT APPLICATION
coLo
lnstructions:- Contact the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) or'
- Contact the issuing authority to determine what plans and other
- Complete this form (some questions may not apply to you) and
your local government to determine your issuing authority.
documents are required to be submitted with your application.
attach all necessary documents and Submit it to the issuing authority
Please print
or type
- Submit an application for each access affected.
- lf you have any questions contact the issuing authority
- For additional information see CDOT's Access Management website at htto://www.dot.state.co.us/AccessPermits/index'htm
1) Property owner (Permittee)
Garfield CountY
2) Agent for permittee (if different from prope rty owner)
Street address
108 8th Street
Mailing address
City, state & zip
Glenwood Spgs, CO 81601
Phone #
970-945-82L2
City, state & zip )
E-mail address
f j armanG garf ield- countY . com
E-mail address if available
3) Address of property to be served by permit (required)
The property does not hawe an address
4) Legal description of property: lf within j urisdictional limits of Municipality, city and/or County, which one?
county , subdivisionGarfield
I rl1 lot section township
13 | 31 and 32 17
range
I a-ro, s,81
5) What State Highway are you requesting access from?
sH 82
6) What side of the hiohwav?trN E.'E= !w
7) How many feet is the proposed access from the nearest mile post?
0 teetEuE S[E 16.00
How many feet is the proposed access from the nearest cross street?
0 feet N EsEe County Road 100
8) What is the approximate date you intend to begin construction?
6/L/20]-7
9) Check here if you are requesting a:
[--l ne* access Itemporary access (duration anticipated:
I cnange in access use [removal of access
)f]irprou"rn"nt to existing access
lelocation of an existing access (provide detail)
10) Provide existing property use
Property is vacant
11) Do you have knowledge of any State Highway access permits serving this property, or adjacent properties in-Eno
Iyes,ifyes-whatarethepermitnumbe(s)andprovidecopies: 399134, 308135
copies attached
which you have a property interest?
and/or, Permitdale: 7 / 3L / 2008
'12) Does the property owner own or have any interests in any adjacent
EIl,"
'
fl ,"., if yes - please describe:
property?
13) Are there other existing or dedicated public streets, roads, highways or access easements' ff no Ely"", if yes - list them on your plans and indicate the proposed and exi
bordering or within the ProPertY?
sting access points.
.14) lf you are requesting agricultural field access - how many acres will the access serve?
15) lf you are requesting commercial or
business/land use
industrial access please indicate the types and number of businesses and provid
square footage business
le the floor area square footage of each.
square footage
16) lf you are requesting residential developement access, what is the type (single family, apartment, townhouse) and number of units?
number of unitstypenumber of units type
Single Family Dwelling Units t,,
DupIex 118
17) Provide the following vehicle count estimales for vehicles that will use the access Leaving the property then returning is two counts
lndicate if vour counts are
Jllpeak hour volumes or. Iauerage daily volumes.
# of passenger €rs and light trucks at peak hour volumes
78
# of multi unit trucks at peak hour volumes
# of single unit vehicles in excess of 30 tt.# of farm vehicles (field equipment)Total count of all vehicles
78
Previous editions are obsolete and may not be used Page 1 of 2 CDOT Form #137 12104
18) Check with the issuing authority to determine which of the following documents are required to complete the review of your application
a) Property map indicating other access, bordering roads and streets.
b) Highway and driveway plan profile.
c) Drainage plan showing impact to the highway right-of-way.
d) Map and letters detailing utility locations before and afler
development in and along the right-of-way.
e) Subdivision, zoning, ordevelopment plan.
f) Proposedaccessdesign.
g) Parcel and ownership maps including easements.
h) Traffic studies.i) Proofofownership.
1- lt is the applicant's responsibility to contact appropriate agencies and obtain all environmental clearances that apply
to their activities. Such clearances may include Corps of Engineers 404 Permits or Colorado Discharge Permit System
permits, or ecological, archeological, historical or cultural resource clearances. The CDOT Environmental Clearances
lnformation Summary presents contact information for agencies administering certain clearances, information about
prohibited discharges, and may be obtained from Regional CDOT Utility/Special Use Permit offlces or accessed via the
CDOT Planning/Construction-Environmental-Guidance webpage http://www.dot.state.co.us/environmental/Forms.asp.
2- All workers within the State Highway right of way shall comply with their employer's safety and health policies/
procedures, and all applicable U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulations - including, but not
limited to the applicable sections of 29 CFR Part 1910 - Occupational Safety and Health Standards and 29 CFR Part 1926
- Safety and Health Regulations for Construction.
Personal protective equipment (e.9. head protection, footwear, high visibility apparel, safety glasses, hearing protection,
respirators, gloves, etc.) shall be worn as appropriate for the work being performed, and as specified in regulation. At a
minimum, all workers in the State Highway right of way, except when in their vehicles, shall wear the following personal
protective equipment: High visibility apparel as specified in the Traffic Control provisions of the documentation
accompanying the Notice to Proceed related to this permit (at a minimum, ANSI/ISEA 107-1999, class 2); head
protection that complies with the ANSI 289.1-1997 standard; and at allconstruction sites orwheneverthere is danger of
injury to feet, workers shall comply with OSHA's PPE requirements for foot protection per 29 CFR 1910.136, 1926.95,
and 1926.96. lf required, such footwear shall meet the requirements of ANSI 241-1999.
Where any of the above-referenced ANSI standards have been revised, the most recent version of the standard shall
apply.
3- The Permittee is responsible for complying with the Revised Guidelines that have been adopted by the Access Board
under the American Disabilities Act (ADA). These guidelines define traversable slope requirements and prescribe the
use of a defined pattern of truncated domes as detectable warnings at street crossings. The new Standards Plans and
can be found on the Design and Construction Project Support web page at:
<http://www.dot.state.co.us/DesignSupporU>, then click on Desrgrn Bulletins.
lf an access permit is issued to you, it will state the terms and conditions for its use. Any changes in the use of the
permitted access not consistent with the terms and conditions listed on the permit may 6e cons-idered a violation of the
permit.
The applicant d-eclares under penalty of perjury in the second degree, and any other applicable state or federal
Iaws, that all information provided on this form and submitted attachments aie to the-best of their knowledge
true and complete.
I understand receipt of an access permit does not constitute permission to start access construction work.
Applicant's signature Print name Date
lf the applicant is not the owner of the property, we require this application also to be signed by the property owner or
th.eir_legally a.uthorized representativ_e (or other acceptable written evidence). This signature shall consiitute agreement
with this applicatlon by all owners-of-interest unless stated in writing. lf a peirmit is issued, the property ownerl in most
cases, will be listed as the permittee.
Property owner signature Print name Date
Previous editions are obsolete and may not be used Page2of2 CDOTFoTm#137 12104
INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING APPLICATION FOR ACCESS PERMIT
(cDoT FORM NO. 137)
December 2004
To construct, relocate, close, or modiff access(es) to a State Highway or when there are
changes in use of such access point(s), an application for access permit must be submitted
to the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) or the local jurisdiction serving as
the issuing authority for State Highway Access Permits. Contact the CDOT Regional
Access Unity in which the subject property is located to determine where the application
must be submitted. The following link will help you determine which CDOT Region
office to contact:
http://www.dot.sta . co. us/AccessPern-rits/PDF/Reei on Address and Map.pdf
All applications are processed and access permits are issued in accordance to the
requirements and procedures found in the most current version of the State Highway
Access Code (Access Code). Copies of the Access Code and the application form are
available from the CDOT Headquarters, Access Unit located at 1325 South Colorado
Boulevard, Denver, CO 80222 and in each of the six Regional CDOT offices. The
locations of CDOT Regional Off,rces, the Access Code and the application form are also
available from CDOT's web site at:
http://www.dot. state.co.essPennits/index.htm
Please complete all information requested accurately. Access permits granted based on
applications found to contain false information may be revoked. An incomplete
application will not be accepted. If additional information, plans and documents are
required, attach them to the application. Keep a copy of your submittal for your records.
Please note that only the original signed copy of the application will be accepted. Do not
send or enclose any permit fee at this time. A permit fee will be collected if an access
permit is issued. The following is a brief description of the information to be provided on
each enumerated space on the application form (CDOT Form 137,2004).
1. Property Owner (Permittee): Please provide the full name, mailing address and
telephone number and the E-mail address (if available) of the legal property owner
(owner of the surface rights). Please provide a telephone number where the Permittee can
be reached during business hours (8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.). Having a contract on the
property is not a sufficient legal right to that property for purposes of this application. If
the access is to be on or across an access easement, then a copy of the easement MUST
accompany this application. If federal land is involved, provide the name of the relevant
federal agency AND attach copy of federal authorization for property use.
2. Agent for permittee: If the applicant (person completing this application) is
different than the property owner (Permittee), provide entity name (if applicable), the full
name of the person serving as the Agent, mailing address, telephone number, and the E-
Instructions for completing Application for Access Permit (CDOT Form 137), Decemb er, 2004
Page 1
mail address (if available). Please provide a telephone number where the Agent can be
reached during business hours (8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.). Joint applications such as
owner/lessee may be submitted. Corporations must be licensed to do business in
Colorado: All corporations serving as, or providing, an Agent as the applicant must be
licensed to do business in Colorado.
3. Address of Property to be Served: Provide if property to be served has an
ofhcial street address. If the access is a public road, note the name (or future name) of the
road.
4. Legal Description of Property: Fill in this item to the extent it applies. This
information is available at your local County Courthouse, or on your ownership deed(s)
A copy of the deed may be required as part of this application in some situations. To
determine applicability, check with the CDOT's Regional Access Manager or issuing
authority staff.
5. State Highway: Provide the State Highway number from which the access is
requested.
6. Highway Side: Mark the appropriate box to indicate what side of the highway the
requested access is located.
7. Access Mile Point: Without complete information, we may not be able to locate
the proposed access. To obtain the distance in feet, drive the length between the mile
point and the proposed access, rounding the distance on the odometer to the nearest tenth
of a mile; multiply the distance by 5,280 feet to obtain the number of feet from the mile
point. Then enter the direction (i.e. north, south, east, west) from the mile point to the
proposed access. Finally, enter the mile point number. It is helpful in rural or
undeveloped areas if some flagging is tied to the right-of-way fence at the desired
location of the access. Also, if there is a cross street or road close to the proposed access,
note the distance in feet (using the same procedures noted above) from that cross street or
road.
8. Access Construction Date: Fill in the date on which construction of the access to
planned to begin.
9. Access Request: Mark items that apply. More than one item may be checked.
10. Existing property use: Describe how the property is currently being used. For
example, common uses are Single Family Residential, Commercial or Agricultural.
11. Existing Access: Does the property have any other legal alternatives to reach a
public road other than the access requested in this application? Note the access permit
number(s) for any existing state highway access point(s) along with their issue date(s). If
there are no existing access point(s), mark the "no" box.
Instructions for completing Application for Access Permit (CDOT Form 137), Decemb er, 2004
Page2
12. Adjacent Property: Please mark the appropriate box. If the "yes" box is marked,
provide a brief description of the property (location of the properly in relation to the
property for which this access application is being made).
13. Abutting Streets: If there are any other existing or proposed public roads or
easements abutting the property, they should be shown on a map or plan attached to this
application.
14. Agricultural Acres: Provide number of acres to be served.
15 and 16. Access Use: List the land uses and square footage of the site as it will be
when it is fully developed. The planned land uses as they will be when the site is fully
developed are used to project the amount of traffic that the site will generate, peak hour
traffic levels and the type of vehicles that can be expected as a result of the planned land
uses. There may be exceptional circumstances that would allow phased installation of
access requirements. This is at the discretion of the CDOT Regional Access Unit or
issuing authority staff.
17. Estimated Traffic Count: Provide a reasonable estimate of the traffic volume
expected to use the access. Note the type of vehicles that will use the access along with
the volume (number of vehicles in and out at either the peak hour or average daily rates)
for each type of vehicle. A vehicle leaving the property and then returning counts as two
trips. If 40 customers are expected to visit the business daily, there would be 80 trips in
addition to the trips made by all employees and other visitors (such as delivery and trash
removal vehicles). If the PDF on-line version of this application is being used, the fields
for each type of vehicle will automatically be added together to populate the last field on
the page.
18. Documents and Plans: The CDOT Regional Access Manager or issuing
authority staff will determine which of these items must be provided to make the
application complete. Incomplete applications will not be accepted. If an incomplete
application is received via U.S. mail or through means other than in the hand of the
Access Manager or issuing authority staff, it will not be processed. It is the
responsibility of the applicant to verify with the CDOT Regional Access Manager or
issuing authori4t staff whether the application is complete at the time of submission
Signature: Generally, if the applicant is not the property owner, then the property owner
or a legally authorized representative must sign the application. With narrow exceptions,
proof of the property owner's consent is required to be submitted with the application
(proof may be a power of afforney or a similar consent instrument). The CDOT Regional
Access Manager or issuing authority staff will determine if the exception provided in the
Access Code (2.3 (3) (b) is applicable.
If CDOT is the issuing authority for this application, direct your questions to the CDOT
Regional Access Manager or the issuing authority staff serving the subject property.
Instructions for completing Application for Access Permit (CDOT Form 137), December,2004
Page 3
http://www.dot.state.co.us/AccessPermits/PDF/Reqion Address and Map.pdf
If the application is accepted, it will be reviewed by the CDOT Regional Access Manager
or the issuing authority staff. If an Access Permit is issued, be sure to read all of the
attached Terms and Conditions before signing and returning the Access Permit. The
Terms and Conditions may require that additional information be provided prior to
issuance of the Notice to Proceed.
The CDOT Regional Access Manager (or issuing authority staff) MUST be contacted
prior to commencing work on any Access Permit project. A Notice to Proceed that
authorizes the Permittee to begin access related construcfion MUST be issued prior to
working on the access in the State Highway right-of-way. The Notice to Proceed may
also have Terms and Conditions that must be fulfilled before work may begin on the
permitted access.
Instructions for completing Application for Access Permit (CDOT Form 137), December, 2004
Page 4
Re
January XX, 2010
Dan Roussin
CDOT Region 3
Permits Unit
222 South 6th Street
Room 100
Grand Junction, CO 81501
Access Permit Application
TCI Lane Ranch
Garfield County Road 100 to SH 82
Dear Dan:
Garfield County Commissioners approved the TCI Lane Ranch PUD on December 7,2009
(Resolution 2009-81). This development will include 89 new residential lots south of SH 82,
east of Garfield County Road L00. The property is accessed directly from Old State Highway 82
(frontage road), and the developer has already obtained two access permits for direct access to
Old SH 82 from the subject property.
This attached access permit application is for the increased access to State Highway 82 from
County Road 100. While the project will only add 5% to the volume of this intersection,
improvements are being required at the intersection by Garfield County, including construction
of a dedicated right turn lane from northbound County Road 100 to the up valley direction of
State Highway 82. These off-site improvements will be completed by the developer as part of
the TCI Lane Ranch project.
The following documents have been attached as part of this application:
o Access Permit Application
. Approved access permit 308134 for TCI Lane Ranch
. Approved access permit 308135 for TCI Lane Ranch
r Traffic memorandum prepared by Drexel, Barrell & Co. April 6th, 2009 (signed and
sealed)
o Site plan showing conceptual improvements and turning movements at the intersection
of CR 100 and SH 82
. Copy of background emails
We appreciate your attention to this project. lf you have any questions or comments, please do
not hesitate to call me at (970-945-82L21or the developer's traffic engineer (Ann Bowers 720
214-09ss).
Sincerely,
Garfield County Signature
Attachments
Drexel, Barrell & Co.
Engineers 5i Surveyors
ffim-\.,1-m
@IE'@_::zjs"zffi
MEMORA
TO:
CC:
FROM
DATE:
RE:
COLORADO DOT REGION 3 ACCESS MANAGER
222 South Sixth Street, Room 100
Grand Junction, CO 81501
AfiN. DAN ROUSSIN
Scott Hall, Garfield County
Ann Bowers, P.E., PTOE
April6, 2009
State Highway E2lCounty Road 100
lntersection Capacity lmprovement Memorandum
Garfield County, Colorado
lntroduction:
This memorandum outlines the proposed effect of anticipated improvements to the intersection
of State Highway 82 and County Road 100 within Garfield County. The primary improvement
anticipated at this time is the construction of a right tum lane from northbound County Road
100 to the up valley direction of State Highway 82.
Project Background:
A tiaffic study was submitted to the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) and
Garfield County by Drexel, Banell & Co. - June 27,2008 - regarding the projected impacts of
the TCI Lane Ranch residential development to be located along the SH 82 Frontage Road.
This development is approximately one quarter mile to the east of the intersection of County
Road 100 and State Highway 82. GDOT granted two access permits for this development to
the SH 82 Frontage Road (No. 308134 and 308135) on August 26' 2008.
As part of the study, the northbound approach of the County Road 100 / SH 82 was identified
as operating unacceptably under existing conditions. There is a strong imbalance in traffic flow
at the approach during the AM peak hour, wilh74% of total approach traffic turning right onto
SH 82. As this approach is single lane, the right turning vehicles are forced to queue with the
through and left tuming vehicles. This also results in the unpaved shoulder of County Road 100
being used as a right turn lane. A right turn acceleration lane on SH 82 is already in existence
at this location. The existing conditions at this location can also been in Figure 1:
rj i)- _'_i 7 '()-:i
Figure 1 - Existing Roadway Geometry
As can be seen in Figure 1, there are existing constraints to further expansion at this location.
The close proximity of the Catherine Store to County Road 100 currently limits widening to the
west. The existing Roaring Fork Transportation Authority park and ride facility provides some
barrier to the east.
While TCI Lane Ranch is expected to use this intersection as its primary access to SH 82, the
anticipated 23 vehicles using the northbound approach during the AM peak hour would
constitute only a 6% increase over the projected Year 2009 background traffic.
Queuing Analysis:
Synchro Version 7 was used to estimate the queues generated for the northbound approach of
this intersection, with and without the addition of a northbound right turn lane. As there is an
existing dedicated right turn acceleration lane in the up valley direction of SH 82, the potential
right turn lane was modeled as a free movement. Modeling in this fashion assumes that no
substantial queue would be generated by this movement. Therefore, the primary focus of this
investigation is on the existing northbound leftthrough-right lane. Following construction of a
right turn lane, this lane would only serve the left and through movements. The results of this
analysis are tabulated in Table 1. The full Synchro queuing analysis reports are attached to
this memorandum.
123N7'hStreet,Suite300GrandJunction,Colorado 81501 Te1 970257 1350Far970257 1066
{. /.;,:,
t
Table 1: Queuei An is
*As the potential northbound right fum lane would be considered
a free movemenl no substantial queueing would be epecbd.
Two variables are illustrated in Table 1; the 50th percentile queue and the 95th percentile queue.
The 50th percentile queue is the projected average queue expected during the peak fifteen
minutes of the respective peak hour. The 95'n percentile queue is typically taken as the longest
peak hour queue to be anticipated under normal operating conditions.
As can be seen in Table 1, the construction of a dedicated rightturn lane is expected to have a
substantial positive effect on the length of the queue experienced for northbound left and
through vehicles, especially during the AM peak hour. With the turn lane, the projected Year
2030 queues, including TCI Lane Ranch traffic, would be expected to be substantially lower
than those experienced under existing conditions. The PM peak hour, while also improved by
the addition of a right turn lane, would not be expected to experience as dramatic of an
improvement. This is likely due to the somewhat more balanced turning movement distribution
experienced during the PM peak hour.
The unusual geometry of adjacent roadways may have an effect on the actual queues
experienced at this location. The north flowline of the intersection of County Road 1 00 and the
SH 82 Frontage Road is approximately 130 feet south of the SH 82 traffic signal. lt is unlikely
that the right turn lane would be extended past this point unless the entire section of roadway is
reconstructed. When through-left queues exceed this distance, right turning vehicles are likely
to be forced to remain with the through traffic, further contributing to the queue at this location.
NB h*
e EYearTraffic Gondition
2008
2009
2009
2030
2030
2009
2009
2030
2030
Existing AM
Background AM
TotalAM
Background AM
TotalAM
Background AM (w NBR)
TotalAM (w NBR)
Background AM (w NBR)
TotalAM (w NBR)
305
348
403
761
819
75
B4
179
191
724
757
825
1001
1061
1U
198
289
316
2008
2009
2009
2030
2030
2009
2009
2030
2030
Existing PM
Background PM
TotalPM
Background PM
TotalPM
Background PM (w NBR)
TotalPM (w NBR)
Background PM (w NBR)
TotalPM (w NBR)
182
190
202
889
932
77
105
272
283
461
485
516
'1139
1184
195
247
458
478
@EI@E
1 23 N 7'r' Street, Suite 300 Grand Junction, Colorado 8150 t Te1 970 257 1 350 Fax 970 257 1066
Level of Service:
Per the 2008 Traffic Study, the northbound approach of the County Road 100 / SH 82
intersection is currently operating at Hiqhwav Capacitv Manual. 2000 Level of Service (LOS) F
conditions during the AM peak hour, indicating that the approach is experiencing a high level of
congestion. This is consistent with the queuing analysis provided. While some of the delay
experienced on this approach can be attributed to the long 180 second cycle length used at this
intersection, the lack of a right turn lane also affects delay at this intersection.
With the addition of a northbound right turn lane at this intersection, the approach would be
expected to improve to LOS C following the build out of TCI Lane Ranch during both the AM
and PM peak hours. lt is anticipated that the Level of Service for this approach would then be
maintained at an acceptable LOS D during the AM peak hour through the long term planning
horizon of Year 2030.
The stronger influence of left and through traffic during the PM peak hour may further degrade
Level of Service on this approach to LOS E by Year 2030, regardless of whether TCI Lane
Ranch is constructed. However, given the long cycle length of this traffic signal, LOS E is not
atypical for minor street approaches. Given this, the queue length should be considered the
most important Measure of Effectiveness at this location.
Conclusion:
The construction of a northbound right turn lane is believed to provide increased capacity for
the northbound approach of the County Road 100 / SH 82 far in excess of the impacts
anticipated from the addition of TCI Lane Ranch traffic.
At part of this effort is also anticipated that a raised median between the northbound and
southbound directionswill also be constructed on County Road 100. This separation of traffic
flow should also provide a safety benefit to the south approach of this intersection as part of the
construction effort.
Please call if you would like any additional information or have any questions regarding this
matter.
Sincerely,
Drexel, Banell& Co.
Ann Bowers, PE, PTOE
Regional Manager / Transportation
Department Head
i23 N 7'r' Street, Suite 300 Grand Junction, Colorado 8150i Tel 970 257 1350 Fax 970 257 1066
HCM Signalized lntersection Capacity Analysis
2: State Highway 82 & Countv Road 100 H :\E5875\Reports\Traffic\Signal for memo\2008 Exist AM.syn
j +\ t {F +- a t t L I J
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
ldeal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
37
1 900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.95
1770
I 570
1 900
4.0
0.95
1.00
1.00
3539
1.00
3539
I
90
1 900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1 583
1.00
1 583
104
1 900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.95
1770
397
1 900
4.0
0.95
1.00
1.00
3539
1.00
3539
I
4
1 900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1 583
1.00
1 583
61
1 900
&
33
1 900
5.0
1,00
0.90
0.99
1 663
0.93
1564
266
1 900
23
1 900
+
23
1 900
5.0
1.00
0.96
0.98
1764
0.6'l
1 089
17
1 900
Satd. Flow
Peak-hourfactor, PHF
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
0 .92
98
31
67
.92
40
0
40
0.92
1707
0
1707
0.92
18
0
0
0.92
113
0
113
0.92
25
7
61
0.92
432
0
432
0.92
25
0
0
0.92
66
0
0
0.92
4
1
3
0.92
289
0
0
0.92
36
53
338Lane Group Flow (voh)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Tlme (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
6
29.7
30.7
0.21
6.0
4.0
62
Prot
3
Prot
7
Perm PermPerm Perm
7.3
8.3
0.06
5,0
4.0
81.5
83.5
0.58
6.0
8.0
4
81.5
83.5
0.58
6,0
8.0
15.0
16.0
0.11
5.0
4.0
89.2
91.2
0.64
6.0
8.0
8
89.2
91.2
0.64
6.0
8.0
2
29.7
30.7
0.21
6.0
4.0
4 8
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, dl
Progression Factor
lncremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
103
0.02
0.39
65.0
1.00
3.3
68.3
E
2064
c0.48
0.83
24.0
1.00
3.7
27.7
C
27.8
c
2254
0.12
1 008 335923 198
c0.06
233
0.04
0.07
13.0
1.00
0.1
13.1
B
0,57
60.3
1.00
4.7
65.0
E
0.19
10.8
1.00
0.2
10.9
B
22.1
C
0.00
0.00
9.5
1.00
0.0
9,5
A
c0,22
101
56.2
1.00
5'l .1
107.4
F
107.4
F
0.06
0.26
46.8
1.00
0.8
47.6
D
47.6
D
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
I ntersection Capacity Uti lization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group
38.1
0.84
143.2
83.5%
15
HCM Level of Service
Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service
13.0
E
Synchro 7 - Report
Page 3
Baseline
0
Timings
2: State Hig hway 82 & County Road 100 H:\E5875\Reports\Traffic\Signal for memo\2008 Exist AM'syn
\t+\atLIj+
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Detector Phase
Switch Phase
Minimum lnitial (s)
Minimum Split (s)
Total Split (s)
Total Split (%)
Yellow Time (s)
All-Red Time (s)
Lost Time Adjust (s)
Total Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
RecallMode
Act Effct Green (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
v/c Ratio
Control Delay
Queue Delay
Total Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS
tt
570
4
37
Prot
7
7
61490
Perm
2
2
104
Prot
3
4.0
9.0
25.0
13.9%
4.0
1.0
-1.0
4.0
Lead
I
38
t+
397
20.0
26.0
130.0
72.2%
5.0
1.0
-2.0
4.0
Lag
B
I
20.0
26.0
130.0
72.2%
5.0
1.0
-2.0
4.0
Lag
Perm Perm
s
23
6
23
Perm
s
33
2
4
4
4 2 6
6
b
4.0
9.0
15.0
8.3%
4.0
1.0
-1.0
4.0
Lead
None
10.0
0,07
0.32
77.6
0.0
77.6
E
20.0
26.0
120.0
66.7T0
5.0
't.0
-2.0
4.0
Lag
Min
82.3
0.58
0.83
28.3
0.0
28.3
c
28.1
C
20.0
26.0
120.0
66.70/o
5.0
1.0
-2.0
4.0
Lag
4.0
10.0
35.0
4.0
2.0
-1.0
5.0
None
4.0
10.0
35.0
19.4Y0
4.0
2.0
-1.0
5.0
4.0
10.0
35.0
19.4o/o
4.0
2.0
-1.0
5.0
4.0
10.0
35.0
19.4Y0
4,0
2.0
-1.0
5.0
19.4f0
Min
82.3
0.58
0.10
4.3
0.0
4.3
A
None
16.0
0.11
0.57
75.5
0.0
75.5
E
Min
91.3
0.64
0.19
10.7
0,0
10.7
B
24.0
c
Min
91.3
0.64
0.00
5.0
0.0
5.0
A
None
30.8
0.22
1.00
91.4
0,0
91.4
F
91.4
F
None None
30.8
0.22
0.28
51.0
0.0
51.0
D
51.0
D
Cycle Length: 180
Actuated Cycle Length: 142.4
Natural Cycle:60
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.00
lntersection Signal Delay: 36.5
lntersection Capacity Utilization 83.5%
Analysis Period (min) 15
and Phases: 2: State H
lntersection LOS: D
ICU Level of Service E
82&Road 100I-;
s7 sBtsE
Synchro 7 - Report
Page 1
Baseline
Queues
2: State Hiqhway 82 & County Road 100 HlE587S\Reports\Traffic\Signal for memo\2008 Exist AM.syn
)+\{ts \tt
Lane Group Flow (vph)
v/c Ratio
ControlDelay
Queue Delay
Total Delay
Queue Length 50th (ft)
Queue Length 95th (ft)
lntemal Link Dist (ft)
Turn Bay Length (ft)
Base Capacity (vph)
Starvation Cap Reductn
Spillback Cap Reductn
Storage Cap Reductn
Reduced v/c Ratio
40
0.32
77.6
0.0
77.6
35
92
98
0.10
4.3
0.0
4.3
I
34
113
0.57
75.5
0.0
75.5
98
203
432
0.1 I
10.7
0.0
10.7
85
108
10127
4
0.00
5.0
0.0
5.0
U
4
391
1.00
91.4
0,0
91.4
-305
#724
117
68
0.28
51.0
0.0
51.0
45
119
768
275
1 326
0
0
0
0.07
1707
0.83
28.3
0.0
28.3
641
785
638
2937
0
0
0
0.58
450
140
0
0
0
0.29
350
268
0
0
0
0.42
39
1
350
1400
n
0
0
0,00
31 29
0
0
0
0.14
r1
0
0
0
243
0
0
0
0.28.00
- Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Synchro 7 - Report
Page 2
Baseline
HCM Signalized lntersection Capacity Analysis
2: State H 82 & County Road 100 HlE5875\Reports\Tt raffic\Signal for memo\2008 Exist PM.syn
.r +\ t +\a t t Lt I
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
ldeal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
17
1 900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0,95
1770
565
1 900
4,0
0.95
1.00
1,00
3539
'1.00
3539
I
44
1 900
4.0
1,00
0.85
1.00
't583
1.00
1 583
\
380
1900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.95
1770
1477
1 900
4.0
0.95
1.00
1.00
3539
1.00
3539
8
1 900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1 583
1.00
1 583
3
1 900
+
7
1 900
5.0
1.00
0.93
0.99
1716
0.96
1658
12
1 900
+
34
1 900
5.0
1,00
0,93
0.98
1 695
0.88
1511
111
1 900
179
1 900
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
0.92
18
0
18
0.92
614
0
614
0.92
48
29
19
0,92
413
0
413
0.92
121
0
0
0.92
37
21
332
0.92
I
I
15
0.92
13
0
0
0.92
1605
0
1605
0 0.92
3
0
0
0.92
195
0
0
.92
I
4
5Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Prot
3
Prot
7
Perm Perm Perm Perm
3.0
4.0
0.04
5.0
4.0
40.6
42.6
0.40
6.0
8.0
4
40.6
42.6
0.40
6.0
8.0
20.5
21.5
0.20
5.0
4.0
I
58.1
60.1
0.56
6.0
8.0
8
58.1
60.1
0.56
6.0
8.0
29.7
30.7
0.28
6.0
4.0
4 2 6
2 6
29.7
30.7
0.28
6.0
4.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, dl
Progression Factor
lncremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
66
0.01
0.27
50.5
1.00
3.0
53.5
D
1 399
0.17
0.44
23.9
1,00
0.9
24.8
C
25.2
C
1 973
c0.45
0.81
19.3
1.00
3.5
22.8
C
47.8
D
883 430626 353
c0.23
472
0.01
0.03
20.0
1.00
0.1
20.0
c
1.17
43.1
1.00
102.6
145.8
F
0.00
0.01
'10.6
1.00
0.0
10.6
B
c0.22
0.77
35.3
1.00
8.8
44.1
D
44.1
D
0.01
0.03
27.8
1.00
0.0
27.9
C
27.9
C
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
I ntersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group
42.2
0.87
107.8
80.6%
15
HCM Level of Service
Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service
9.0
D
Synchro 7 - Report
Page 3
Baseline
Timings
2: State Hig hway 82 & County Road 100 H:\E5875\Reports\T raffic\Signal for memo\2008 Exist PM.syn
\ t {F \ a t L t)+
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Tum Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Detector Phase
Switch Phase
Minimum lnitial(s)
Minimum Split (s)
Total Split (s)
TotalSplit (%)
Yellow Time (s)
All-Red Time (s)
Lost Time Adjust (s)
Total Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode
Act Effct Green (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
v/c Ratio
ControlDelay
Queue Delay
TotalDelay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS
8
\
380
Prot
3
3
1477
cl+
34
+
7
6
b
17
Prot
7
7
44
Perm
565 I 111
Perm Perm
3
Perm
4
4
2
I
8
4
4 8
b
6
2
2 2
4.0
9.0
15.0
8.3%
4.0
1.0
-1.0
4.0
Lead
None
8.8
0.08
0.12
52,6
0.0
52.6
D
20.0
26.0
120.0
66.7o/o
5.0
1.0
-2.0
4.0
Lag
Min
39.2
0.37
0.46
24.7
0.0
24.7
c
24.0
c
20.0
26.0
120.0
66.7o/o
5.0
1,0
-2.0
4.0
Lag
4.0
9.0
25.0
13.90/o
4.0
1.0
-1.0
4.0
Lead
None
21.5
0.21
1.14
129.8
0.0
129.8
F
20.0
26.0
130.0
72.2Yo
5.0
1.0
-2.0
4.0
Lag
Min
60.1
0.57
0.79
21.4
0,0
21.4
C
43.4
D
20.0
26.0
130.0
72.2Y0
5,0
1.0
-2.0
4.0
Lag
4.0
10.0
35.0
19.4T0
4.0
2.0
-1.0
5.0
4.0
10.0
35.0
19.4Y0
4.0
2.0
-1.0
5.0
None
30.7
0.29
0.76
45.7
0.0
45.7
D
45.7
D
4.0
10.0
35.0
19.4T0
4.0
2.0
-1.0
5.0
None
4.0
10.0
35.0
19.4T0
4.0
2.0
-1.0
5.0
None
30.7
0.29
0.05
22.3
0.0
22.3
C
22.3
c
Min
39.2
0.37
0.08
5.0
0,0
5.0
A
Min
60.1
0.57
0.01
5.9
0.0
RO
A
None
Cycle Length: 180
Actuated Cycle Length: 104.7
Natural Cycle: 65
Conkol Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.14
lntersection Signal Delay: 39.2
lntersection Capacity Utilization 80.6%
Analysis Period (min) '15
lntersection LOS:D
ICU Level of Service D
ts and Phases: 2: State 82&Road 100
o4
'I t s2
i,tl*,,t'-sE
Synchro 7 - Report
Page 1
Baseline
Queues
2: State Highway 82 & County Road 100 H:\E5875\Reports\Traffic\Signal for memo\2008 Exist PM.syn
i + \ t {F +- t t
Lane Group Flow (vph)
v/c Ratio
ConkolDelay
Queue Delay
TotalDelay
Queue Length 50th (ft)
Queue Length 95th (ft)
lntemal Link Dist (ft)
Turn Bay Length (ft)
Base Capacity (vph)
Starvation Cap Reductn
Spillback Cap Reductn
Storage Cap Reductn
Reduced v/c Ratio
18
0.12
52.6
0.0
52.6
11
40
614
0.46
24.7
0.0
24.7
157
200
638
48
0.08
5.0
0.0
5.0
0
20
275
1547
0
0
0
0.03
413
1.14
129.8
0.0
129.8
-295
#671
1 605
0.79
21.4
0.0
21.4
354
605
10127
o
0.01
EO
0.0
5.9
0
8
353
0.76
45.7
00
45.7
182
M61
117
450
190
0
0
0
0.09
4643457
350
363 35240000
00
1.14 0,46
0
0
0
0.76
0
0
0
0.01
0
0
0
0.18
350
576
24
0.05
22.3
0.0
22.3
5
3'l
768
495
0
0
0
0.05
- Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite.
Queue shown is maximum aftertwo cycles.
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Synchro 7 - Report
Page 2
Baseline
HCM Signalized lntersection Capacity Analysis
2: State High wav 82 & County Road 100 HlE587S\Reports\Traffic\Signal for memo\2009 Background AM.syn
)+\{{-\a t t L t t
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
ldeal FIow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
II
3B
1 900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0,95
1770
0.95
1770
++
1 603
1 900
4.0
0.95
1.00
100
3539
1.00
3539
88
1 900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1 583
1.00
I 583
102
1 900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.95
1770
405
1 900
4.0
0.95
1.00
1.00
3539
1.00
3539
ir
4
1 900
4.0
100
0.85
1.00
1 583
1.00
1 583
63
1 900
+i
34
1 900
5.0
1.00
0.90
0.99
1 663
0.93
1562
273
1 900
23
1 900
+l+
22
1 900
5.0
1.00
0.96
0.98
1762
0.59
1 051
17
1 900
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
0.92
41
0
41
92
96
29
67
0.92
68
0
0
0.92
25
0
0
0.92
1742
0
1742
0.92
111
0
111
0.0.92
440
0
440
0.92
4
1
3
0.92
37
54
348
0.92
297
0
0
0.92
18
0
0
0,92
24
7
60Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Prot
7
Perm Prot PermPermPerm
4 38 62
7.3
8.3
0.06
5.0
4.0
83.7
85.7
0.59
6,0
8.0
4
83.7
85.7
0.59
6.0
8.0
15.0
16.0
0.11
5.0
4.0
91.4
93.4
0.64
6.0
8.0
I
91,4
93.4
0.64
6.0
8.0
29.7
30.7
0.21
6.0
4.0
2
29.7
30.7
0.21
6.0
4.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
101
0.02
0.41
66.2
1,00
3.6
69.8
E
2086
c0.49
0.84
24.1
1.00
3,9
28.0
c
28.2
C
2273
0.12
0.19
10.6
1.00
0.2
10.8
B
21.8
C
1017
0.00
0.00
9.3
1,00
0.0
9,3
A
330
c0.22
1.06
57.4
100
64.9
122.3
F
122.3
F
222933 195
c0.06
0.04
0.07
12.8
1,00
0.1
12.9
B
0.57
61.4
1.00
4.6
66.0
E
0.06
0.27
48.0
100
0.9
48.9
D
48.9
D
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
I ntersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group
40.5
0.85
145.4
84.9%
15
HCM Level of Service
Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service
D
13.0
E
Synchro 7 - Report
Page 3
Baseline
o
Timings
2; Stalq Higtwqy 82 & County Road 100 H:\E5875\Reports\Traffi c\Signal for memo\2009 Background AM.syn
)+\,-ts\\f\t
ffiq[rn.;r';;*,;,r;;irif*ri:iffirr,*,;f;H[ix'ffi* ,ffi*,i;*.1iffi.'.:adffi:;a##liU;iiffii;ffi#t&,;*l',;;;v,''xrx,*,;l
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Detector Phase
Switch Phase
Minimum lnitial(s)
Minimum Split (s)
Total Split (s)
Total Split (%)
Yellow Time (s)
All-Red Time (s)
Lost Time Adjust (s)
Total Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode
Act Effct Green (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
v/c Ratio
Control Delay
Queue Delay
TotalDelay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS
t
38
Prot
7
7
4.0
9.0
15.0
8.3%
4.0
1.0
-1.0
4.0
Lead
None
10.0
0.07
0.33
79.1
0.0
79.1
E
++
1 603
4
4
20,0
26.0
120.0
66.7Yo
5.0
1.0
-2.0
4.0
Lag
Min
84.5
0.58
0.84
28.6
0.0
28.6
c
28.5
C
I
88
Perm
4
4
20,0
26.0
120.0
66.7%
5,0
1,0
-2.0
4.0
Lag
Min
84.5
0.58
0.10
4.4
0.0
4.4
A
t
102
Prot
3
3
4.0
9.0
25,0
13.9%
4.0
1.0
-1,0
4.0
Lead
None
16.0
0.1 1
0.57
76.5
0.0
76.5
E
20.0
26.0
130.0
72.2%
5,0
1.0
-2.0
4.0
Lag
Min
93.4
0.65
0.19
10.6
0.0
10.6
B
23.7
c
20.0
26.0
130.0
72.2%
5,0
1.0
-2.0
4.0
Lag
Min
93.4
0.65
0.00
5.0
0.0
5,0
A
4.0
10.0
35.0
4.0
10.0
35.0
4.0
2.0
-1.0
5.0
4.0
10.0
35.0
19.4T0
4.0
2.0
-1.0
5.0
4.0
10.0
35.0
19.4%
4.0
2.0
-1.0
5.0
23
Perm
++)
3463
Perm
ir
4
Perm
+t
405
6
6
2
2
2
2
8
8
8
I
c|r
22
6
6
19.4Y09.40/o
4.0
2.0
-1.0
5.0
None NoneNone
30.7
0.21
1.04
102.7
0.0
102,7
F
102.7
F
None
30.7
0.21
0.29
52.3
0.0
52.3
D
52.3
D
Cycle Length: 180
Actuated Cycle Length: 144.5
Natural Cycle: B0
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 1,04
lntersection Signal Delay: 38.4
lntersection Capacity Utilization 84.9%
Analysis Period (min) 15
lntersection LOS: D
ICU Level of Service E
and Phases: 2: State 82 & Cou Road 100
t sZ
t aE i ,t l+,,
Synchro 7 - Report
Page 1
Baseline
Queues
2: State Highway 82 & County Road 100 H :\E5875\Reports\Traffic\Signal for memo\2009 Background AM.syn
i +\{+-+-
b*lffimi.{*& :Ei.i*r"1.:*i&Hh,'fiffi,Frri#fi8filri;.$,Et. ,t}0m[:,;,. ,,; ;im'H,"*4i;.il';li*;;:i,il'.**##[g#.."u,i
t t
Lane Group Flow (vph)
v/c Ratio
ControlDelay
Queue Delay
Total Delay
Queue Length 50th (ft)
Queue Length 95th (ft)
lntemal Link Dist (ft)
Turn Bay Length (ft)
Base Capacity (vph)
Starvation Cap Reductn
Spillback Cap Reductn
Storage Cap Reductn
Reduced v/c Ratio
41
0.33
79.1
0.0
79.1
36
94
1742
0.84
28,6
0.0
28.6
666
817
638
111
0,57
76.5
0.0
76.5
98
200
440
0.19
10.6
0.0
10.6
87
110
10127
4
0,00
5.0
0.0
5.0
0
4
402
1.04
102.7
0.0
102.7
-348
#757
117
67
0.29
52.3
0.0
52.3
45
117
768
96
0.10
4.4
0.0
4.4
I
34
0
350
264 3088000000
0.42 0.14
2899
0
0
0
0.60
0
0
0
00
450
138
0
0
0
0.30
275
1310
0
0
0
0.07
350
382 230
0
0
0
0.29
386
0
0
0
04
- Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Synchro 7 - Report
Page2
Baseline
HCM Signat zed lntersection Capacity Analysis
2: State Highwa v 82 & County Road 100 H :\E5875\Reports\Traffi c\Signal for memo\2009 Background AM-fix.syn
i \t{-+*attLtl
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
ldeal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
3B
1 900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0,95
1770
0.95
1770
1 603
'1900
4.0
0.95
1.00
1.00
3539
1.00
3539
t
88
1 900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
'1583
1.00
1 583
Il
102
1 900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.95
1770
405
1 900
4.0
0,95
1.00
1.00
3539
1.00
3539
if
4
1 900
4.0
1,00
0.85
1.00
1 583
1.00
1 583
c.t
34
1 900
5.0
1,00
1,00
0.97
1 804
0.77
1441
f
273
1 900
4.0
1,00
0.85
1.00
1 583
1.00
1 583
+
22
1 900
5.0
1.00
0.96
0.98
1762
0.86
1 541
17
1 900
63
1 900
23
1 900
Satd. Flow (perm
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
0.92
41
0
41
0.92
111
0
111
0.92
37
0
105
0.92
24
I
59
0,92
1742
0
1742
0.92
440
0
440
0.92
297
0
297
0.920.92
96
27
69
0.92 0.92 0.92
18
0
0
25
0
0
68
0
0Lane Group Flow (vph)
4
1
3
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Prot
7
Perm Prot PermPerm Free Perm
4 38 2 6
7.1
8.1
0.07
5.0
4.0
75.8
77.8
0,62
6.0
8,0
4
75.8
77.8
0.62
6.0
8.0
14.7
15.7
0.1 3
5.0
4.0
83.4
85.4
0.69
6,0
8.0
I
83.4
85.4
0.69
6.0
8.0
17.0
18.0
0.14
6.0
4.0
Free
124.5
124.5
1.00
17.0
18.0
0.14
6.0
4.0
62
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
lncremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
lnt#ac#aii, giinirtary,
115
0.02
2212
c0.49
989
0.04
0.07
223
c0.06
0.50
50.7
't.00
2.4
53.1
D
2428
0.12
0.18
7.0
1.00
0.2
7.2
A
16.3
B
:l
'1086
0.00
0.00
6.2
1.00
0.0
6.2
A
208 1583 223
0.36
55.7
1.00
t.o
58.3
E
0.79
17.2
1.00
2.7
20.0
B
20.3
c
9.2
1.00
0.1
9.3
A
c0.07
0.50
49.1
1.00
l.o
51.8
D
13.7
B
0.1 I
0.19
0.0
1.00
0.3
0.3
A
0.04
0.27
47.4
1.00
0.9
48.2
D
48.2
D
ir{r-,&.Mif sii;'";i,l
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
lntersection Capacity Uti lization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group
19.2
0.70
124.5
70.9T0
15
HCli4 Level of Service
Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service
B
13.0
C
Synchro 7 - Report
Page 3
Baseline
:,,.., : .1'a',
Timings
2: State Highway 82 & County Road 100 HlE5875\Reports\Traffi c\Signal for memo\2009 Background AM-fi x.syn
)-+
t
38
Prot
7
\a t t L I-}{
6
6
2
2
4
4
0.0
4.0
ts
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Detector Phase
Switch Phase
Minimum lnitial (s)
Minimum Split (s)
fotal Split (s)
Total Split (%)
Yellow Time (s)
All-Red Time (s)
Lost Time Adjust (s)
Total Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
RecallMode
Act Effct Green (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
v/c Ratio
ControlDelay
Queue Delay
fotal Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS
-t
341 603
4
4
20.0
102
Prot
3
3
63
Perm
40588
Perm
273 23
Free Perm
Free8
8
8
8
2
2
6
7 6
4.0
9.0
15.0
8.3Y0
4.0
1.0
-1.0
4.0
Lead
None
10.3
0.08
0.28
70.1
0,0
70.1
E
26.0
120.0
66.7Y0
5.0
1.0
-2.0
4.0
Lag
Min
76.4
0,62
0,80
21.6
0.0
21.6
21.7
C
20.0
26.0
120.0
66.7%
5.0
1.0
-2.0
4.0
Lag
Min
76.4
0.62
0.10
3.9
0.0
3.9
A
4.0
9.0
25.0
13.9T0
4.0
1.0
-1.0
4.0
Lead
None
15.8
0.13
0.49
65.6
0.0
65,6
E
20.0
26.0
130.0
72.2%
5.0
1.0
-2.0
4.0
Lag
Min
85,5
0,69
0.18
7.8
0.0
7.8
A
19.3
B
20.0
26.0
'130.0
72.2Y0
5.0
1.0
-2.0
4.0
Lag
Min
85,5
0.69
0.00
4.5
0.0
4.5
A
4.0
10.0
35.0
19.40/o
4.0
2.0
-1.0
5.0
4.0
10.0
35.0
19.4Y0
4.0
2.0
-1.0
5.0
0.0
0.0%
124.2
1.00
0.19
0.3
0.0
0.3
A
4.0
10.0
35.0
19.4%
4.0
2.0
-1.0
5.0
None
4.0
10.0
35.0
19.4Y0
4.0
2.0
-1.0
5.0
None
18.0
0.14
0.29
52.0
0.0
52.0
D
52.0
D
None None
18.0
0.14
0.50
64.0
0.0
64.0
E
'16.9
B
Cycle Length: 180
Actuated Cycle Length: 124.2
Natural Cycle: 60
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.80
lntersection Signal Delay: 21.3
lntersection Capacity Utilization 70.9%
Analysis Period (min)'15
lntersection LOS: C
ICU Level of Service C
and Phases: 2: State Hi 82 & Cou Road 100,ir rwo
t,sE /r, l*sB
Synchro 7 - Report
Page 1
Baseline
s
22
I
4
Perm
Queues
2: State H 82 & County Road 100 HlE5875\Reports\Traffic\Signal for memo\2009 Background AM-fix'syn
)--+\ t {- \ t t I
diil'i,', ,,',ffi&;;;,EH[,,'tj ,.,,11!Hto.,. r,.1ffi,;;,,lV1&B .i',rffi;,,@E;,1l@'*:r+i'],,itu$i';l+M&#
r-ane Ooup now 1vpn1 41 1742 96 111 440 4 105 297 67
v/c Ratio 0.28 0.80 0.10 0.49 0.18 0.00 0.50 0.19 0.29
ControlDelay
Queue Delay
TotalDelay
Queue Length 50th (ft)
Queue Length 95th (ft)
lnternal Link Dist (ft)
Turn Bay Length (ft)
Base Capacity (vph)
Starvation Cap Reductn
Spillback Cap Reductn
Storage Cap Reductn
Reduced v/c Ratio
70.1
0.0
70.1
30
93
21.6
0.0
21.6
500
793
638
3.9
0.0
3.9
7
33
65.6
0.0
65.6
80
198
64.0
0.0
64.0
75
184
117
0.3
0.0
0.3
0
0
52.0
0.0
52.0
40
114
768
275 350
7.8 4.5
0.0 0.07.8 4.5630106 4
10127
350450
168
0
0
0
0.24
31 55
0
0
0
0.55
1419
0
0
0
0.07
32 3260 1459 373 1583 406
0.35 0
000
000000
0.28 0.19 0.17
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
'13
0
0
0
00
Synchro 7 - Report
Page2
Baseline
HCM Signalized lntersection Capacity Analysis
2: State Hig hway 82 & County Road 100 H:\E5875\Reports\Traffi c\Signal for memo\2009 Total AM.syn
)+\t++-\ttLtl
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
ldeal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
\
38
1 900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0,95
1770
++
1 603
1 900
4.0
0.95
1.00
1.00
3539
1.00
3539
90
1 900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
'1583
1.00
1 583
'106
1 900
4.0
'1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.95
1770
++
405
1 900
4,0
0.95
1.00
1.00
3539
1.00
3539
I
4
1 900
4.0
1,00
0.85
1.00
1 583
1.00
1 583
69
1 900
rl+
36
1 900
5.0
1.00
0.90
0.99
1664
0.92
1552
286
1 900
23
1 900
+)
23
1 900
5.0
1.00
0.96
0.98
1764
0.57
1028
17
1 900
Satd. Flow (perm
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
0,92
41
0
41
0.92
115
0
115
0.92
75
0
0
0.92
1742
0
1742
0.92
440
0
440
0.92
39
51
374
0.92
311
0
0
0.92
25
7
61
0.92
18
0
0
0.92
25
0
0
0.92
4
1
3
0.92
98
30
68Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
2
PermPermProt
7
Perm Prot Perm
4 38 6
7.3
8.3
0.06
5.0
4.0
83.9
85.9
0.59
6.0
8.0
4
83.9
85.9
0.59
6.0
8.0
15,3
16.3
0.1 1
5.0
4.0
91.9
93.9
0.64
6.0
8.0
8
91.9
93.9
0,64
6.0
8,0
29.7
30.7
0.21
6.0
4.0
o2
29.7
30.7
0.21
6.0
4.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, dl
Progression Factor
lncremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
101
0.02
0.41
66.4
1.00
3.6
70.0
E
2084
c0.49
0.84
24.3
1.00
3.9
28.2
C
28.3
C
2278
0.12
0.19
10.6
1.00
0.2
10.8
B
22,2
C
101 9
0.00
0.00
9.3
1.00
0.0
9.3
A
327932 198
c0.06
216
0.04
0.07
12.9
1.00
0.1
13.0
B
0.58
61.6
1.00
c. I
66.6
E
c0.24
1.14
57.6
1.00
94.3
151.9
F
151.9
F
0.06
0.28
48.3
1.00
1.0
49.3
D
49.3
D
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
lntersection Capacity Uti lization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group
45.6
0.88
145.9
86.7T0
15
HCM Level of Service
Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service
D
13.0
E
Synchro 7 - Report
Page 3
Baseline
!4IBT
Timings
2: State Highway 82 & County Road 100 H:\E5875\Reports\T raffic\Signal for memo\2009 Total AM.syn
\t.-\atLli+
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Detector Phase
Switch Phase
Minimum lnitial(s)
Minimum Split (s)
Total Split (s)
TotalSplit (%)
Yellow Time (s)
All-Red Time (s)
Lost Time Adjust (s)
Total Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode
Act Effct Green (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
v/c Ratio
Control Delay
Queue Delay
Total Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS
1 603
\
106
Prot
3
3
ct+
2323
Perm
694405
I
90
Perm
Gtt
3638
Prot
7
7
Perm Perm
8
8
4
4
4
4
2
2
2
2
b
6
I
I
6
6
4.0
9.0
15.0
8.3%
4.0
'1.0
-1.0
4.0
Lead
None
10.0
0.07
0.34
79.3
0.0
79.3
E
20.0
26.0
120.0
66.7Y0
5.0
1.0
-2.0
4.0
Lag
20.0
26.0
120.0
66.7%
5.0
1.0
-2.0
4.0
Lag
Min
84.7
0.58
0.10
4.4
0.0
4.4
A
4.0
9.0
25.0
13.9%
4.0
't.0
-1.0
4.0
Lead
None
16.3
0.11
0.58
76.9
0.0
76.9
E
20.0
26.0
130.0
72.2f0
5.0
1.0
-2.0
4.0
Lag
Min
93.9
0.65
0.19
10.5
0.0
10.5
B
24.1
c
20.0
26.0
130.0
72.2Y0
5.0
1.0
-2.0
4.0
Lag
Min
93.9
0.65
0.00
4.8
0.0
4.8
A
4.0
10.0
35.0
19.4Y0
4.0
2.0
-1.0
5.0
4.0
10.0
35.0
19.4Yo
4.0
2.0
-1.0
5.0
None
30.7
0.21
1.12
125.5
0.0
125.5
F
125.5
F
4.0
10.0
35.0
19.4%
4.0
2.0
-1.0
5.0
None
4.0
10.0
35.0
19.4Yo
4.0
2.0
-1,0
5.0
Min
84.7
0.58
0.84
28.8
0.0
28.8
C
28.6
C
None None
30.7
0.21
0.30
52.8
0.0
52.8
D
52.8
D
Cycle Length: 180
Actuated Cycle Length: 145
Natural Cycle: 75
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.12
lntersection Signal Delay:42.3 lntersection LOS: D
lntersection Capacity Utilization 86.7% ICU Level of Service E
Analysis Period (min) 15
at twa
t sZ {ss
}s6
--l+-
s7 I sB
and Phases: 2: State 82 & Cou Road 100
Synchro 7 - Report
Page 1
Baseline
*s4
Queues
2: State Highway 82 & County Road 100 H :\E5875\Reports\Traffic\Sig nal for memo\2009 Total AM.syn
)-+\{F \It
tri&jl.;i6j-i,i;ffi&f:r#iEHfi!';t'EBR, VtlBL ,.UET WBR .l*Bil ",$?.$ ,,l; .'..l.,*:.rl;i'.rre,n*$eliir':;x$
Lane Group Flow (vph)
v/c Ratio
ControlDelay
Queue Delay
TotalDelay
Queue Length 50th (ft)
Queue Length 95th (ft)
lnternal Link Dist (ft)
Turn Bay Length (ft)
Base Capacity (vph)
Starvation Cap Reductn
Spillback Cap Reductn
Storage Cap Reductn
Reduced v/c Ratio
41
0.34
79.3
0.0
79.3
37
94
1742
0.84
28.8
0.0
28.8
672
817
638
98
0.1 0
4.4
0.0
4.4
10
35
115
0.58
76.9
0.0
76,9
102
206
440
0.19
10.5
0,0
10.5
87
110
10127
4
0.00
4.8
0.0
4.8
0
4
425
1.12
125.5
0.0
125.5
-403
#825
117
68
0.30
52.8
0.0
52.8
46
120
768
450 350
262 3080000000
0.44 0.14
275
1 307
0
0
0
0.07
350
378138
0
0
U
r1
0
0
0
60
289
00.30
380 225
0
0
0
0.30
0
0
0
12
0
0
0
0.00
- Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Synchro 7 - Report
Page 2
Baseline
1
HCM Signalized lntersection Capacity Analysis
2: State Highway 82 & County Road 100 H 1E587S\Reports\Traffi c\Signal for memo\2009 Total AM-fix.syn
i \{\a t r L I tts-+
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
ldeal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
\
38
1 900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.9s
1770
0.95
1770
++
1 603
1 900
4.0
0.95
1.00
1.00
3539
1.00
3539
I
90
1 900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1 583
1.00
1 583
\
106
1 900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.95
1770
405
1 900
4.0
0.95
1.00
1.00
3539
1.00
3539
4
1 900
4.0
1.00
0.85
'1.00
1 583
1.00
1 583
69
1 900
.T
36
1 900
5.0
1.00
1.00
0.97
1 803
0.77
1428
286
1 900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1 583
1.00
1 583
23
1 900
+
t3
1 900
5.0
1.00
0.96
0.98
1764
0.86
1 543
17
1 900
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
0.92
41
0
41
0.92
1742
U
1742
0.92
98
27
71
0.92
115
0
115
0,92
25
0
0
0.92
440
n
440
0.92 0.92 0,92
0
114
4
1
3
75
0
0
0.92
25
8
60
39
0.92
311
0
311
0.92
18
0
0
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Tlme (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
PermProt
7
Perm Prot Perm Free Perm
4 38 2
7.1
8.1
0.06
5.0
4.0
77.0
79.0
0.62
6.0
8.0
4
77.0
79.0
0.62
6.0
8.0
15.0
16.0
0.13
5.0
4.0
84.9
86.9
0,68
6.0
8.0
B
84.9
86.9
0,68
6,0
8.0
18.0
19.0
0.15
6,0
4.0
Free
127.0
127.0
1,00
18.0
19.0
0.15
6.0
4.0
2 6
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, dl
Progression Factor
lncremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Levelof Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
113
0.02
0.36
57.0
1.00
2.7
59,7
E
2201
c0.49
0.79
17.9
1.00
2.8
20,6
C
20.9
c
2422
0.12
0.18
7.2
1.00
0.2
7.4
A
17.1
B
1 083
0.00
0.00
6.3
1.00
0.0
6.3
A
985 223
c0.06
214 1583 231
0.04
0.07
9.5
1.00
0.1
9.6
A
0.52
51.9
1.00
2.7
54.5
D
c0.08
053
49.9
1.00
3.2
53.1
D
14.5
B
0.04
0.26
47.8
1.00
0.8
48.6
D
48.6
D
0.20
020
0.0
1,00
0.3
0.3
A
19.9
0.71
127.0
71.2Y0
15
HCM Level of Service
Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service
B
13.0
C
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
I ntersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group
Synchro 7 - Report
Page 3
Baseline
Timings
2: State Hig hwav 82 & County Road 100 H:\E5875\Reports\Traffi c\Signal for memo\2009 Total AM-fi x.syn\a t t \ I)
2328669
Perm
6
6
+\{{-
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permifted Phases
Detector Phase
Switch Phase
Minimum lnitial(s)
Minimum Split (s)
Total Split (s)
TotalSplit (%)
Yellow Time (s)
All-Red Time (s)
Lost Time Adjust (s)
Total Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode
Act Effct Green (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
v/c Ratio
ControlDelay
Queue Delay
Total Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS
38
Prot
7
7
4.0
9.0
15.0
8.3%
4.0
1.0
-1.0
4.0
Lead
None
10.2
0.08
0.29
71.6
0.0
71.6
E
1 603
4
4
20.0
26.0
120.0
66.7%
5.0
1.0
-2.0
4.0
Lag
Min
77.6
0.61
0.80
22.4
0.0
22.4
C
22.5
C
f
90
Perm
4
4
20.0
26.0
120.0
66.7%
5.0
1.0
-2.0
4.0
Lag
Min
77.6
0.61
0.1 0
4.1
0.0
4.1
A
106
Prot
3
3
4.0
9.0
25.0
13.9%
4.0
1.0
-1.0
4.0
Lead
None
16.1
0.1 3
0.51
67.1
0,0
67.1
E
405
I
I
20.0
26.0
130,0
72.2%
5.0
1.0
-2.0
4.0
Lag
Min
87.0
0.69
0.18
8.0
0.0
8.0
A
20.2
c
f
4
Perm
I
I
20.0
26.0
130,0
72.2Y0
5.0
1.0
-2.0
4.0
Lag
Min
87.0
0.69
0.00
4.5
0.0
4.5
A
4.0
10,0
35.0
19.4Y0
4.0
2.0
-1.0
5.0
4.0
10.0
35.0
19.4T0
4.0
2.0
-1.0
5.0
None
19.1
0.'15
0.53
65.1
0.0
65.'l
E
17.7
B
0.0
0.0%
4.0
10,0
35.0
19.4o/o
4.0
2.0
-1.0
5.0
+i
23
4.0
10,0
35.0
19.4Y0
4.0
2.0
-1.0
5.0
Free Perm
2
2
2
2
Free
6
6
None
0.0
4.0
126.7
1.00
0.20
0.3
0.0
0.3
A
None None
19.1
0.15
0.28
52.1
0.0
52.1
D
52.1
D
Cycle Length: 180
Actuated Cycle Length: 126.7
Natural Cycle:60
Conhol Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.80
lntersection Signal Delay: 22.0
I ntersection Capacity Ulilizalion 7 1 .2o/o
Analysis Period (min) 15
lntersection LOS: C
ICU Level of Service C
I IYYq
t sZ s4
+'sE
and Phases: 2: State 82&Road 100
Synchro 7 - Report
Page 1
Baseline
.t
36
Queues
2: State Highway 82 & County Road 100 HlE587S\Reports\Traffic\Signal for memo\2009 Total AM-fi x.syn
)+\ t {F \ t t I
M;,**ffi#i,ffi1*,j,ffili:,**dll&lr,,,';l0HB ,,,,ilE[- r.ff8R,..tfiffI]:,:'r..r:;;rrffi;eq#S#*'*
Lane Group Flow (vph)
v/c Ratio
ControlDelay
Queue Delay
Total Delay
Queue Length 50th (ft)
Queue Length 95th (ft)
lntemal Link Dist (ft)
Turn Bay Length (ft)
Base Capacity (vph)
Starvation Cap Reductn
Spillback Cap Reductn
Storage Cap Reductn
Reduced v/c Ratio
41
0.29
71.6
0.0
71.6
31
94
1742
0.80
22.4
0.0
22.4
517
815
638
98
0.10
4.1
0.0
4.1
8
35
275
1404
0
0
0
0.07
115
0.51
67.1
0.0
67.1
85
206
440
0.18
8.0
0.0
8.0
65
110
10127
114
0.53
65.1
0.0
65.1
84
198
117
311
0.20
0.3
0.0
0.3
0
0
6B
0.28
52.1
0.0
52.1
41
115
768
3
450
164
0
0
0
0.25
4
0.00
4.5
0.0
4.5
0
4
0
314 324100
0000
0.37 0j4
0
0
0
31
19
0
0
0
350 350
1 450
0
0
0
0.000,56
398583362
0
0
0
0
0.17
0
0
0
20
l0iFfficlipB$Uilm$i,;**,i,..i.1';' ;i..-;.';;.- :.,.," . . ,. . ,'..... ,-...o."t;;,.';.*:.;i..
Synchro 7 - Report
Page2
Baseline
1
HCM Signalized lntersection Capacity Analysis
2: State Highway 82 & County Road 100 H:\E5875\Reports\Traffic\Signal for memo\2009 Background PM.syn
) +\ { ta t t \ t J
iffi i &btjgr&i M,ffi,*isffi&M#h[i;.r'. u,Btr:, \frtsil,ii ; ;r NBr N08,,,;rSk;,,;&8,T,r;i] B
LaneConfigurations \ ++ | \ ++ | & +
Volume (vph) 17 577 44 377 1508 8 113 34 181 3 7 12
ldeal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1,00 1.00 1.00
Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.93 0.93
Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.99
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 1695 1716
Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.88 0.96
Satd. FIow (perm) 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 1510 1657
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
0.92
'18
0
18
.92
48
29
19
0.92
410
0
410
92
3
0
0
197
0
0
37
22
335
123
0
0
o
4
5
0.92
627
0
627
0 0.92
1 639
0
1 639
0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0 0.92
I
I
15
0.92
13
0
0
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Prot
7
3.0
4.0
0.04
5.0
4,0
4
42.0
44.0
0.40
6.0
8.0
Perm
4
42.0
44.0
0.40
b.u
8.0
20,5
21.5
0.20
5.0
4.0
I
59.5
61.5
0.56
b.u
8.0
8
59.5
61.5
0.56
6,0
8.0
2
29.7
30.7
0,28
6.0
4.0
6
PermPermPermProt
3
62
29.7
30.7
0.28
6.0
4.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
lncremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
65
0.01
0.28
51.2
1.00
3.2
54,3
D
1426
0.1 8
0.44
23.7
1.00
0.9
24.6
c
25.0
c
0.01
0.03
19.7
1.00
0.1
19.8
B
1.18
43.9
1.00
106.0
149.9
F
0.82
19.4
1.00
3.7
23.1
C
48.3
D
0.00
0.01
10.5
1,00
0.0
10.5
B
c0.22
0.79
36.3
1.00
9.9
46.2
D
46.2
D
466
0.01
0.03
28.5
1,00
0.0
28.5
C
28.5
638 348 1993
c0.23 c0.46
892 425
lhffipd(frr$iifiiffi;ffit:ii*,r,,i;i';1,i:.',:.1 I '"'r" ,,,:,,1i!',,',,.,',,r,i,t,'1".i, .
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
lntersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group
42.8
0.88
109.2
81.70/o
15
HCM Level of Service
Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service
D
9.0
D
Synchro 7 - Report
Page 3
Baseline
;-. . l- ,;,,1t' i,;j;i,i ;ll
Timings
2: State Hig hwav 82 & Countv Road 100 HIE587S\Reports\Traffic\Signal for memo\2009 Background PM'syn\a t Lt\{+i
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Detector Phase
Switch Phase
Minimum lnitial(s)
Minimum Split (s)
Total Split (s)
Total Split (%)
Yellow Time (s)
All-Red Time (s)
Lost Time Adjust (s)
Total Lost fime (s)
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode
Act Effct Green (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
v/c Ratio
ControlDelay
Queue Delay
TotalDelay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS
17
Prot
7
\
377
Prot
3
3
None
21.5
0.20
1.14
132.4
0.0
132.4
F
++
1 508
I
8
20.0
26.0
130.0
72.20/o
5.0
1.0
-2,0
4.0
Lag
Min
61.5
0.58
0.80
21.6
0.0
21.6
C
43.6
D
c+)
34
(+t
7
6
6
44
Perm
577
4
4
8 113
Perm Perm
3
Perm
7
4
4
o
b
2
2
2
2
I
I
4.0
9.0
15.0
8.3%
4.0
1.0
-1.0
4.0
Lead
None
8.8
0.08
0.12
53.8
0.0
53.8
D
20.0
26.0
120.0
66.7%
5.0
1.0
-2.0
4,0
Lag
Min
40.6
0.38
0.46
24.5
0.0
24.5
C
23.9
C
20.0
26.0
120.0
66.7%
5.0
1.0
-2.0
4.0
Lag
Min
40.6
0.38
0.08
4.8
0.0
4.8
A
4,0
9.0
25.0
13.9%
4.0
1.0
-1.0
4.0
Lead
200
26.0
130.0
72.20/o
5.0
1.0
-2.0
4.0
Lag
4.0
10.0
35.0
4.0
10.0
35.0
19.4Y0
4.0
2.0
-1.0
5.0
None
30.7
0.29
0.78
47.7
0.0
47.7
D
47.7
D
4.0
10.0
35.0
19.4Y0
4,0
2.0
-1.0
5.0
4.0
10.0
35.0
19.4%
4.0
2.0
-1.0
5.0
None
30.7
0.29
0.05
23.0
0.0
23.0
c
23.0
C
19.4T0
4.0
2.0
-'1.0
5.0
None NoneMin
61.5
0.58
0.01
5.8
0.0
5.8
A
ffiiffi*fift ,'*fi..M# fAt#; '.1,{;l;;.; ,, ,il3',::ii. .;r;;,ii:,.r,,',',..,,'i,,;: , ,,*;iii;i'jfqt&*";t#*};Efii*;
Cycle Length: 180
Actuated Cycle Length; 106.2
Natural Cycle: 65
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.14
lntersection Signal Delay: 39.5 lntersection LOS: D
lntersection Capacity Utilization 81.7% ICU Level of Service D
Analysis Period (min) 15
and Phases: 2: State 82&Road 100
t sZ t''r3 tr s4
l+-lsE+sB
Synchro 7 - Report
Page 1
Baseline
Queues
2: State Highway 82 & County Road 100 H:\E5875\Reports\Traffic\Signal for memo\2009 Background PM.syn
)+\{ts+-tl
lffi#,;1,i,;giii$fu kilffi,#ffi,e,ffi,ffi;,.;lffiR .,.UEt .,,;ffi;..r,,*;,..;, .:i; ,,ri,i:.:'*r*,r"*;,',i
Lane Group FIow (vph)
v/c Ratio
ControlDelay
Queue Delay
TotalDelay
Queue Length 50th (ft)
Queue Length 95th (ft)
lnternal Link Dist (ft)
Turn Bay Length (fi)
Base Capacity (vph)
Starvation Cap Reductn
Spillback Cap Reductn
Storage Cap Reductn
Reduced vic Ratio
't8
0.12
53.8
0.0
53.8
11
41
627
0.46
24.5
0.0
24.5
161
204
638
3430
48
0.08
4.8
0.0
4.8
0
20
410
1.14
132.4
0.0
132.4
-301
#682
1 639
0.80
21.6
0.0
21.6
368
628
10127
I
0.01
5.8
0.0
5.8
0
8
357
0.78
47.7
0.0
47.7
190
#485
117
24
0.05
23.0
0.0
23.0
5
31
768
450
188
0
0
0
0.10
275
536
350
359
0
0
0
1.14
3509
0
0
0
0.47
350
570 459 489
0
0
0
0.050
0
0
U
18
0
0
0
0.03 0.0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0.78
- Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Synchro 7 - Report
Page2
Baseline
HCM Signalized lntersection Capacity Analysis
2: State Highway 82 & Countv Road 100 H:\E5875\Repo rts\Traffic\Signal for memo\2009 Background PM-fix.syn
i \{+-a t t \ I tts
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
ldeal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
\
17
1 900
4.0
1.00
1,00
0.95
1770
0.95
1770
++
577
1 900
4.0
0.95
1.00
1.00
3539
1.00
3539
44
1 900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1 583
'1.00
1 583
377
1 900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.95
1770
1 508
1 900
4.0
0.95
1.00
1.00
3539
1.00
3539
I
8
1 900
4,0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1 583
1.00
1 583
113
1 900
.t
34
1 900
5.0
1.00
1.00
0.96
1794
0.76
1416
181
1 900
4.0
1.00
0.8s
1.00
1 583
1.00
1 583
3
1 900
s
7
1 900
5.0
1,00
0.93
0.99
1716
0.97
1 667
12
'1900
Peak-hourfactor, PHF
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
0.92
18
0
18
92
48
27
2t
0.92
123
0
0
0.92
37
0
160
0.92
I
10
14
00.92
627
0
627
0.0.92
410
0
410
0.92
1639
0
1 639
0.92
I
J
b
0.92
197
0
197
0,92
13
0
0
92
3
0
0
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
6
Prot
J
Prot
7
Perm Perm Perm Free Perm
2.8
3.8
0.04
5.0
4.0
40.9
42.9
0.44
6.0
8.0
4
40.9
42.9
0.44
6.0
8.0
21.2
22.2
0.23
5.0
4.0
8
59.3
61.3
0.63
6.0
8.0
B
59.3
61,3
0.63
6.0
8.0
2
17.7
18.7
0.1 I
6.0
4.0
Free
96.8
96.8
1.00
17.7
18.7
0.19
6.0
4.0
4
2 6
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, dl
Progression Factor
lncremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
lnhnediotl$lrnnnry
69
0.01
0.26
45.1
1.00
2.7
47.9
D
1 568
0.18
0.40
18.2
1.00
0.7
19.0
B
19,5
B
702
0.01
0.03
15.2
1.00
0.1
15.3
B
406
c0.23
1.01
37.3
1.00
47.2
84.5
F
2241
c0.46
0.73
12.1
1.00
2.1
14.3
B
28.2
c
c0.1 1
0.58
35.5
1.00
3.7
39.2
D
17.7
B
0.12
0.12
0.0
1.00
0.2
0.2
A
0.01
0.04
31.8
1.00
0.1
31.8
c
31.8
C
1002
0.00
0.01
6.5
1.00
0.0
6.5
A
274 1583 322
HC[tl Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
I ntersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group
25.1
0.76
96.8
70.6Y0
15
HCM Level of Service
Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service
C
9.0
C
Synchro 7 - Report
Page 3
Baseline
Timings
2: State Highway 82 & CountV Road 100 H:\E5875\Reports\Traffic\Signal for memo\2009 Background PM-fix.syn
)--+\{ts t\ t t r +
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Detector Phase
Switch Phase
Minimum lnitial(s)
Minimum Split (s)
Total Split (s)
IotalSplit (%)
Yellow Time (s)
All-Red Time (s)
Lost Time Adjust (s)
Total Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
RecallMode
Act Effct Green (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
v/c Ratio
Control Delay
Queue Delay
TotalDelay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS
\
17
Prot
7
7
4
4
20.0
26.0
120.0
66.7T0
5.0
1.0
-2.0
4.0
Lag
Min
39.2
0.42
0.07
4.5
0.0
4.5
A
4
4
377 1508
Prot38
8 113
Perm Perm
-tf
34 181 3
Free Perm
2 Free 6
2638
B
8
2
2
cl+
7
6
6
4.0
9.0
15.0
8.3%
4.0
1.0
-1 0
4.0
Lead
None
9.0
0,10
0.11
50.6
0.0
50.6
D
20.0
26.0
120.0
66.7Y0
5.0
1.0
-2.0
4.0
Lag
Min
39.2
0.42
0.43
19.4
0.0
19.4
B
19.2
B
4.0
9.0
25.0
13.9%
4.0
1.0
-1.0
4.0
Lead
None
22.3
0.24
0.98
78.8
0.0
78.8
E
20.0
26.0
130.0
72.20/o
5.0
1,0
-2.0
4.0
Lag
Min
61.4
0.65
0.71
14.6
0.0
14.6
B
27.4
C
20.0
26.0
130.0
72.2o/o
5.0
1.0
-2.0
4.0
Lag
Min
61.4
0.65
0.01
5.1
0.0
5.1
A
4.0
10.0
35.0
19.4T0
4.0
2.0
-1.0
5.0
4.0
10.0
35.0
19.4o/o
4.0
2.0
-1.0
5.0
0.0
0.0%
4,0
10.0
35.0
19.4To
4.0
2.0
-1 0
5.0
4.0
10.0
35.0
19.4%
4.0
2.0
-1,0
5,0
None None
18.8
0.20
0.57
46.0
0.0
46.0
D
20.7
C
0.0
4.0
94.1
1.00
0.12
0.2
0.0
0.2
A
None None
18.8
0.20
0.07
24.6
0.0
24.6
C
24.6
C
Cycle Length: 180
Actuated Cycle Length: 94.1
Natural Cycle: 60
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.98
lntersection Signal Delay: 24.8 lntersection LOS: C
lntersection Capacity Utilization 70.6% ICU Level of Service C
Analysis Period (min)'15
its and Phases: 2: State 82&Road 100
t sZ {,t l*s4
77+,,}s6
Synchro 7 - Report
Page 1
Baseline
577 M
Perm
Queues
2: State Highway 82 & County Road 100 H:\E5875\Reports\Traffic\Signal for memo\2009 Background PM-fix.syn
j +\ { ts +* t f I
Lane Group Flow (vph)
v/c Ratio
ControlDelay
Queue Delay
Total Delay
Queue Length 50th (ft)
Queue Length 95th (ft)
Intemal Link Dist (ft)
Turn Bay Length (ft)
Base Capacity (vph)
Starvation Cap Reductn
Spillback Cap Reductn
Storage Cap Reductn
Reduced v/c Ratio
18
0.11
50.6
0.0
50.6
I
41
627
0.43
19.4
0.0
19.4
130
198
638
410
0.98
78.8
0.0
78.8
221
#671
1 639
0.71
14.6
0.0
14.6
242
605
10127
9
0.01
5.1
0.0
5.1
0
7
160
0.57
46.0
0.0
46.0
77
195
117
197
0.12
0.2
0.0
0.2
0
0
24
0.07
24.6
0.0
24.6
5
31
768
48
0.07
4.5
0.0
4.5
0
20
450
220
0
0
0
0.08
3464
275
1 550
0
0
0
0.03
350
420
0
0
0
0.98
350
57
0.0
583351 I
0
0
0
0.47
4
0
U
0
1
0
0
0
0.12
480
0
0
0
0.33
573
0
0
0
0.04
0
U
0
0.1 8
: . .i
\) . ..,,t -:u,,:,
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Synchro 7 - Report
Page2
Baseline
1
HCM Signalized lntersection Capacity Analysis
2: State Hig hwav 82 & County Road 100 HlE5875\Reports\Traffic\Signal for memo\2009 Total PM.syn
j +\{\a t t L I JF
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
ldeal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
17
1 900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.95
1770
++
577
1 900
4.0
0.95
1.00
1.00
3539
1.00
3539
I
51
1 900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1 583
1.00
1 583
\
392
1 900
4.0
1.00
1,00
0.95
1770
0.95
1770
1 508
1 900
4.0
0.95
1.00
1.00
3539
1.00
3539
I
1 900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1 583
1.00
1 583
117
1 900
Cl+
36
1 900
5.0
1.00
0.93
0.98
1 694
0.88
1510
190
1 900
3
1 900
+i
9
1 900
5.0
1.00
0.93
0.99
1727
0.96
1 670
12
1 900
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
0.92
18
0
18
0.92
39
22
351
0.92
10
I
17
0.92
627
0
627
0.92
426
0
426
0.92
1 639
0
1 639
0.92
127
0
0
0.92
207
0
0
92
55
33
22
0 0.92
13
0
0
0.92
3
0
0
0.92
a
4
5
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Trme (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Prot
3
Prot
7
3.0
4.0
0.04
5.0
4.0
4
42.0
44.0
0.40
6.0
8.0
Perm
4
42.0
44.0
0.40
6.0
8.0
20.5
21.5
0.20
5.0
4.0
I
59.5
61.5
0.56
6.0
8.0
Perm Perm
I
59.5
61.5
0.56
6.0
8.0
Perm
o2
2 6
29.7
30.7
0.28
6.0
4.0
29.7
30.7
0.28
6.0
4.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
lncremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
65
0.01
0.28
51.2
1.00
3.2
54.3
D
1426
0.18
0.44
23.7
1.00
0.9
24.6
c
25.0
c
0.01
0.03
19.7
1.00
0.1
19.8
B
1.22
43.9
1.00
123.9
167.7
F
1 993
c0.46
0.82
19.4
1.00
3.7
23.1
C
52.7
:
0.00
0.01
10.5
1.00
0.0
10.5
B
c0.23
0.83
36.8
1.00
13.0
49.7
D
49.7
D
469
0.01
0.04
28.s
1.00
0.0
28.5
c
28.5
c
638 348
c0.24
892 425
\:
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
lntersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group
46.1
0.90
109.2
82.5Y,
15
HCM Level of Service
Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service
D
9.0
E
Synchro 7 - Report
Page 3
Baseline
Timings
2: State Highway 82 & Countv Road 100 H :\E5875\Reports\Traffi c\Signal for memo\2009 Total PM.syn
)+\{F \L
LaneConfigurations r| ++ | \ ++ | S +
a tt
Volume (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Detector Phase
Switch Phase
Minimum lnitial (s)
Minimum Split (s)
Total Split (s)
TotalSplit (%)
Yellow Time (s)
AII-Red Time (s)
Lost Time Adjust (s)
Total Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
RecallMode
Act Effct Green (s)
Actuated giC Ratio
v/c Ratio
ConkolDelay
Queue Delay
Total Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS
392 1508
Prot38
38
4.0 20.09.0 26.0
25,0 130.0
13.9% 72.2T04.0 5.01.0 1.0-1.0 -2.0
4.0 4.0
Lead Lag
None
21.5
0.20
1.19
147.9
0,0
147.9
F
Min
61.5
0.58
0.80
21.6
0.0
21.6
C
47.4
D
17
Prot
7
7
4.0
9.0
15.0
8.3%
4.0
1.0
-1.0
4.0
Lead
None
8.8
0.08
0.12
53.8
0.0
53.8
D
577
4
4
20.0
26,0
120.0
66.7%
Min
40.6
0.38
0.46
24.5
0.0
24.5
C
23.6
C
51
Perm
4
4
20.0
26.0
120.0
66.7%
5.0
1.0
-2.0
4.0
Lag
Min
40.6
0.38
0.09
4.6
0.0
4.6
A
I
Perm
8
8
20.0
26.0
130.0
72.2%
5.0
'1.0
-2.0
4.0
Lag
Min
61.5
0.58
0,01
5.8
0.0
5.8
A
117
Perm
2
2
4.0
10.0
35.0
19.4Y0
36
2
2
4.0
10.0
35,0
19.4Y0
None
30.7
0.29
0.81
50,6
00
50.6
D
506
D
3
Perm
6
6
4.0
10.0
35.0
19.4Y0
None
o
b
6
4.0
10.0
35.0
19.4Y0
5.0
1.0
-2.0
4.0
Lag
4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0-1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0
5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
None None
30.7
0.29
0.05
23.6
0.0
23.6
c
23.6
C
Cycle Length: 180
Actuated Cycle Length: 106.2
Natural Cycle: 70
Control Type: Actuated-U ncoordi nated
Maximum v/c Ratio: '1.19
lntersection Signal Delay: 42.4
lntersection Capacity Utilization 82.5%
Analysis Period (min) 15
lntersection LOS: D
ICU Level of Service E
and Phases: 2: State Hi 82&Road 100
+' s6 sl sB
Synchro 7 - Report
Page 1
Baseline
rl'j I
Queues
2: State Hish wav 82 & Countv Road 100 H:\E5875\Reports\Traffic\Signal for memo\2009 Total PM.syn
)--+ \ t {- \ t I
Lane Group Flow (vph) 18 627 55 426 1639 I 373 26
v/c Ratio
ControlDelay
Queue Delay
fotal Delay
Queue Length 50th (ft)
Queue Length 95th (ft)
lntemal Link Dist (ft)
Turn Bay Length (ft)
Base Capacity (vph)
Starvation Cap Reductn
Spillback Cap Reductn
Storage Cap Reductn
Reduced v/c Ratio
0.12
53.8
0.0
53.8
11
41
0.46
24.5
0.0
24.5
161
204
638
4.6
0.0
4.6
0
22
1.19
147.9
0.0
147.9
-323
#714
0.80
21.6
0.0
21.6
368
628
10127
0.01
5.8
0.0
5.8
0
B
0.81
50.6
0,0
50.6
202
#516
117
0,05
23.6
0.0
t5.o
6
34
768
0.09
350 350
359 3509 1570 458
000000000000'r.19 0.47 0.01 0.81
275
536
0
0
0
040
3430
0
0
0
0.1 8
450
88
0
0
0
.10
493
0
0
0
050
Nntdrshotlhnffiiiifu ty,
.t _t:... .t:.,:\.::ta";. , ::./,1
-, t:,t. :, .. 2,... I,t .,,,,',,;tt,,:l;, : .i. 1:. :;til;,i;-t.,,:.,
- Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Synchro 7 - Report
Page2
Baseline
HCM Signalized lntersection Capacity Analysis
2: State Highway 82 & County Road 100 H:\E5875\Reports\Traffic\Signal for memo\2009 Total PM-fix,syn
.r+\{{-+*attLtl
[io{hmem.,. . ,' ,'EBk:." EHT,,,.;EBB .trHL UlEfi..r:lffi&i r.,{fF[-, r,ffi[.,.:";#&ue r.SL..,;ffFi$,i,-SB
LaneConfisurations t ++ | \ t+ f S | +
Volume (vph) 17 577 51 392 1508 I 117 36 190 3 I 12
ldeal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1,00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1,00
Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.98 0.85 0.93
Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 1676 1504 1727
FIt Permitted 0.95 1 .00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.79 1.00 0.97
Satd. Flow (perm)1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 1363 1504 1 682
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
0.92
39
3
192
0.92
10
10
16
0.92
13
0
0
0.92
18
0
18
0.92
627
0
627
0 .92
55
31
24
0.92
426
0
426
0.92
1 639
0
1 639
0,92
127
0
0
0.92
0
178
0 .92
I
4
5
0.92
3
0
0
207
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Prot
2.8
3.8
0.04
5.0
4.0
Perm
4
41.8
43.8
0.43
6.0
8.0
Prot
3
Perm Perm
8
60.1
62.1
0.61
6.0
8.0
Perm
62
Free
74
41.8
43.8
0.43
6.0
8.0
21.1
22.1
0.22
5.0
4.0
I
60.1
62.1
0.61
6.0
8.0
2
22.0
23.0
0.23
6.0
4.0
Free
101 .9
101 .9
1,00
6
22.0
23.0
0.23
6.0
4.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
lncremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
loer*,cnirti SrlrnnErV, ;'
66
0.27
47.7
1.00
3.0
50.7
D
1521
0.18
0.41
20.1
1.00
0.8
20.9
c
21.4
C
680
0.01
0.03
16.8
1.00
0.1
16.9
B
384
c0.24
1.11
39.9
1.00
78.9
118.8
F
2157
c0.46
0.76
14.5
1,00
2.5
17.0
B
37.8
D
0,00
0.01
7.8
1.00
0.0
7.8
A
c0.14
0.62
35.5
1.00
4.4
40,0
D
21.0
c
0.12
0.12
0.0
1.00
0.2
0.2
A
380
0,01
0.04
30.8
1.00
0.1
30,9
C
30.9
C
965 308 1504
0,01
.,:, .:,
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
I ntersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group
32.2
0.80
101.9
74.8Y0
15
HCM Level of Service
Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service
C
9.0
D
Synchro 7 - Report
Page 3
Baseline
Timings
2: State Highway 82 & County Road 100 HlE5875\Reports\Traffic\Signal for memo\2009 Total PM-fi x.syn+t\ t t r I{-i+\t
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Detector Phase
Switch Phase
Minimum lnitial(s)
Minimum Split (s)
Total Split (s)
Total Split (%)
Yellow Time (s)
All-Red Time (s)
Lost Time Adjust (s)
Total Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
RecallMode
Act Effct Green (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
v/c Ratio
Control Delay
Queue Delay
Total Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS
\
17
Prot
7
I
4.0
9.0
15.0
8.3%
4.0
1.0
-1.0
4.0
Lead
None
9.0
0.09
0.11
52.6
0.0
52.6
D
++
577
4
4
20.0
26.0
120.0
66.7%
5.0
1.0
-2.0
4.0
Lag
Min
40.2
0.41
0.44
21.3
0.0
21.3
c
20.8
C
f
51
Perm
1 508
I
8
392
Prot
3
I 117
Perm Perm
190 3
Free Perm
Free
Cl+
I
6
6
6
6
r{+
36
2
2
4
4 3
8
8
2
2
20.0
26.0
120.0
66.7Yo
5.0
1.0
-2.0
4.0
Lag
Min
40.2
0.4'l
0.08
4.6
0,0
4.6
A
4.0
9.0
25.0
13.9%
4.0
1.0
-1,0
4.0
Lead
None
22.1
0.22
1.08
1 08.1
0,0
108.'l
F
20.0
26.0
130.0
72.20h
5.0
1,0
-2.0
4.0
Lag
Min
62.1
0.63
0.74
17.2
0.0
17.2
B
35.8
D
20.0
26.0
130,0
72.2Y0
5.0
1.0
-2.0
4.0
Lag
Min
62.1
0.63
0.01
5.6
0.0
5.6
A
4.0
10.0
35.0
19.4Y0
4.0
2.0
-1.0
5.0
4.0
10.0
35.0
19.4Yo
4.0
2.0
-1.0
5.0
0.0
0,0%
4.0
10.0
350
19.4o/o
4.0
2.0
-1.0
5.0
4.0
10.0
35.0
19.4Yo
4.0
2.0
-1.0
5.0
None None
23.1
0.23
0.61
45.5
0.0
45.5
D
23.9
0.0
4.0
99.1
1.00
0.12
0.2
0.0
0.2
A
None None
23.1
0.23
0.06
24.2
0.0
24.2
C
24.2
C
l*fr*j[i#&ii."&'iiihif;8i*l !,i,',''r,, l :,.' r;1t,.:.r,i,;;.,:t t;;ti.t ", :.i.i'
Cycle Length:180
Actuated Cycle Length: 99.1
Natural Cycle: 60
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.08
lntersection Signal Delay: 31.0
lntersection Capacity Utilization 74.8%
Analysis Period (min) 15
lntersection LOS: C
ICU Level of Service D
its and Phases: 2: State 82 & Cou Road 100ilwo
t s2 l*,0
t' s6 i ,rl*oB
Synchro 7 - Report
Page 1
Baseline
{^z
Queues
2: State Hi 82 & CounU Road 100 H:\E5875\Reports\Traffic\Signal for memo\2009 Total PM-fix.syn
) +\ t ts +* t f t
Gne Group Flow (vph) 18 627 55 426 1639 I 195 178 26
v/c Ratio 0.11 0.44 0.08 1.08 0.74 0 01 0.61 012 0.06
Control Delay 52.6 21.3 4.6 108.1 17 .2 5.6 45.5 0'2 24'2
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0'0 0.0 0.0 0'0
Total Delay 52.6 21.3 4.6 108.1 17.2 5.6 45,5 0.2 24'2
Queue Length 50th (ft) 10 144 0 -288 301 0 105 0 6
Queue Length 95th (ft) 41 204 22 #714 628 8 247 0 34
lnternal Link Dist (ft) 638 10127 117 768
Turn Bay Length (ft)
Base Capacity (vph)
Starvation Cap Reductn
Spillback Cap Reductn
Storage Cap Reductn
Reduced v/c Ratio
450
207
0
0
0
0.09
3442
0
0
0
0.18
275
1541
0
0
0
0.04
350
395
0
0
0
1.08
350
350
1 570
0
0
0
0.01
I
0
0
0
7
437 1504 544000000000
0.45 0.12 0.050.4
- Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite.
Queue shown is maximum afier two cycles.
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum afier two cycles.
Synchro 7 - Report
Page 2
Baseline
HCM Signalized lntersection Capacity Analysis
2: State Highway 82 & Counfu ROad 100H:\E5875\Reports\Traffic\Signal for memo\2030 Background AM-exist cond.syn
j +\ t {-\a t t LI I
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
ldeal Flow (vphpl)
fotal Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd, Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
t
59
1 900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.95
1770
++
2491
1 900
4.0
0.95
1.00
1.00
3539
1.00
3539
if
122
1 900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1 583
1.00
1 583
\
142
1 900
4.0
1.00
'1.00
0.95
1770
0.95
1770
630
1 900
4.0
0.95
1.00
1.00
3539
1.00
3539
6
1 900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1 583
1.00
1 583
+
31
1 900
5.0
1.00
0.96
0.98
1 758
0.47
848
27
1 900
cl+
55
1 900
5.0
1.00
0.91
0.99
1 678
0.87
1469
89
1 900
290
1 900
36
1 900
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
.92 0.9264 27080064 2708
000.92
133
22
111
0.92
154
0
154
0.92
685
0
685
0.92
315
0
0
0.92
29
0
0
0.92
60
40
432
0.92
97
0
0
0.92
7
2
5
92
39
0
0
0.92
34
I
94
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance fime (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
2
PermPermProt
7
Perm Prot Perm
9.6
10,6
0.06
5.0
4.0
4
114.0
1 16.0
0.65
6.0
8.0
4
114.0
116.0
0.65
6.0
8.0
18.8
19.8
0.1 1
5,0
4.0
123.2
125.2
0.70
6.0
8.0
I
123.2
125.2
0.70
6.0
8.0
29.0
30.0
0.17
6.0
4.0
38 6
29.0
30.0
0.17
6.0
4.0
o2
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, dl
Progression Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
lnffic.s_onlsuinmrtrryr
105
0.04
196
c0.09
1 108 246
0.61
82.1
1.00
11.1
93.2
L
I
2296
c0.77
1.18
31.4
1.00
85.6
117.0
F
111.7
F
1027
0.07
0.1 1
11.9
1.00
0.2
12.1
B
0.79
77,4
1.00
19.4
96.8
F
2478
0.19
0.28
10.0
'1.00
0,3
10.2
B
26,0
C
0.00
0.00
8.1
1.00
0.0
8.1
A
c0.29
1.76
74.4
1.00
356.6
431.0
F
43't.0
F
142
0.1 1
0.66
69.6
1.00
11.6
81.3
F
81.3
F
, '+.',il .r .' -f'; :'
' .. ' -? i r.4 ^ *' ;-.J.i;. . r r -r. '
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
I ntersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group
129.0
1.24
178.8
116.0%
15
HCM Level of Service
Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service
F
13.0
H
Synchro 7 - Report
Page 3
Baseline
Timings
2: State Highwa y 82 & County Road 1 00 H:\E5875\Reports\Traffic\Signal for memo\2030 Background AM-exist cond.syn
.r+\t \a t Lt
36
Perm
89
Perm
630
2
2
I
8
b
6
4
4
{F
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Detector Phase
Switch Phase
Minimum lnitial(s)
Minimum Split (s)
TotalSplit (s)
Total Split (%)
Yellow Time (s)
All-Red Time (s)
Lost Time Adjust (s)
Total Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
RecallMode
Act Effct Green (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
v/c Ratio
ControlDelay
Queue Delay
TotalDelay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS
\++59 2491
4.0
9.0
15.0
8.3%
4.0
1.0
-1.0
4.0
Lead
None
10.6
0,06
0.61
106.2
0.0
106.2
F
20,0
26.0
120.0
66.7T0
5.0
1.0
-2.0
4.0
Lag
4
Min
1 16.0
0.65
1.18
1 15.9
0.0
1 15.9
F
110.7
F
20.0
26.0
120,0
66.7%
5.0
1.0
-2.0
4.0
Lag
Min
116.0
0.65
0.13
6.6
0.0
6,6
A
4.0
9.0
25.0
13.9%
4.0
1.0
-1.0
4.0
Lead
None
19.8
0.11
0.79
103.5
0.0
103.5
F
20.0
26.0
130,0
72.2To
5.0
1.0
-2.0
4.0
Lag
Min
125.2
0.70
0.28
10.3
0.0
10.3
B
27.2
c
20.0
26.0
130.0
72.2Y0
5.0
1.0
-2.0
4.0
Lag
4.0
10,0
35.0
19.40/o
4.0
2.0
-1.0
5.0
4.0
10.0
35.0
19.4Yo
4.0
2.0
-1.0
5.0
None
30.0
0.17
1.64
343.4
0.0
343.4
F
343.4
F
4.0
10.0
35.0
19.4o/o
4.0
2.0
-1.0
5.0
None
+t
31
6
6
4.0
10.0
35.0
19.4T0
4.0
2.0
-1.0
5.0
None
30.0
0.17
0.68
85.8
0.0
85.8
F
85.8
F
I
122
Perm
142
Prot
3
3
4
Prot
7
7
2
2
Min
125,2
0.70
0.01
4.0
0,0
4.0
A
None
Cycle Length: 180
Actuated Cycle Length: 178.8
Natural Cycle: 150
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordi nated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.64
lntersection Signal Delay: 119.2 lntersection LOS: F
lntersection Capacity Utilization '116.0% ICU Level of Service H
Analysis Period (min) 15
and Phases: 2: State Hi 82 & Cou Road 100
{,ttsZ
}sE
j ,t l*,,
Synchro 7 - Report
Page 1
Baseline
s
55
I
6
Perm
8
8
f]
Queues
2: State Hig hway 82 & County Road 100H:\E5875\Reports\Traffic\Si gnal for memo\2030 Background AM-exist cond.syn
)ts t{\+It
Lane Group Flow (vph)
v/c Ratio
Control Delay
Queue Delay
TotalDelay
Queue Length 50th (ft)
Queue Length 95th (ft)
lnternal Link Dist (ft)
Turn Bay Length (ft)
Base Capacity (vph)
Starvation Cap Reductn
Spillback Cap Reductn
Storage Cap Reductn
Reduced v/c Ratio
64
0,61
106.2
0.0
106.2
75
#139
2708
1.18
115.9
0.0
1 15.9
-2017
#2112
638
133
0.13
6.6
0.0
6.6
30
59
275
154
0.79
103.5
0.0
103.5
179
#288
685
0.28
10.3
0.0
10,3
148
178
10127
7
0.01
4.0
0.0
472
1.64
343.4
0.0
343.4
-761
#1 001
117
102
0.68
85.8
0.0
85.8
104
#193
768
4.0
0
5
17
0
0
0
01
450
109
0
0
0
0.59
2296 0491 28
.64
350
0
2494
0
0
n
0.27
350
208
0
0
0
0.74
::
7
0
0
0
51
0
0
0
0
0
0
13
0
0
0
18 0.68
- Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Synchro 7 - Report
Page 2
Baseline
01
HCM Signalized lntersection Capacity Analysis
2: State Highway 82 & County Road 100 H :\E5875\Reports\Traffi c\Signal for memo\2030 Background AM.syn
i \{ts +-\ t t r I t
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
ldeal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
\
59
1 900
4.0
1.00
100
0.95
1770
0.95
1770
++
2491
1 900
4.0
0.95
1.00
1.00
3539
1.00
3539
I
122
I 900
4.0
1.00
0.85
100
1 s83
1.00
'1583
142
1 900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.95
1770
630
1 900
4.0
0.95
1.00
1,00
3539
1.00
3539
6
1 900
4.0
1,00
0.85
1.00
1 583
1.00
1 583
89
1 900
.t
55
1 900
5.0
1.00
1.00
0,97
1 807
0.68
1272
I
290
1 900
4.0
1.00
0.85
'1.00
1 583
1.00
1 583
36
'1900
fP
31
1 900
5.0
1.00
0.96
0.98
1 758
0.60
1 078
27
1 900
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
0.92
64
0
64
0.92
2708
0
2708
0.92
133
21
112
0.92
154
0
154
0.92
315
0
315
0.92
39
0
0
0.92
29
0
0
0.92
685
0
685
0.92
97
0
0
0.92
7
2
5
0.92
60
0
157
0 92
34
8
94
Tum Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
6
PermPermProt
3
Prot
7
9.6
10.6
0.06
5.0
4.0
4
114.2
116.2
0.66
6.0
8.0
Perm
4
114.2
116.2
0.66
6.0
8.0
18.6
19.6
0.11
5.0
4.0
I
123.2
125.2
0.71
6.0
8.0
8
123.2
125.2
0.71
6.0
8.0
2
25.4
26.4
0.15
6.0
4.0
Free
175.2
175.2
1,00
25.4
26.4
0.15
6.0
4.0
Free Perm
62
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 107 2347 1050 198 2529 1 131 192 1583 162
v/s Ratio Prot 0.04 c0.77 c0.09 0.19
v/s Ratio Perm 0.07 0,00 c0.12 0.20 0.09
v/c Ratio 0.60 1.15 0.11 0,78 0.27 0.00 0.82 0.20 0.58
Uniform Delay, dl 80.2 29.5 10.7 75.7 8.8 7.2 72.1 0,0 69.2
Progression Factor 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
lncremental Delay, d2 10.1 74.6 0.2 18.2 0.2 0.0 233 0.3 5.9
Delay (s) 90.3 104.1 10.9 93.9 9.1 7.2 96.0 0,3 75.1
LevelofService F F B F A A F A E
Approach Delay (s) 99,5 24.5 32J 75.1
ApproachlOS F C C E
lirli{b€cfron $uffirent '' : '.,. ':
HCM Average Control Delay 76.9 HCM Level of Service E
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.05
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 175.2 Sum of lost time (s) 13.0
lntersection Capacity Utilization 100.3% ICU Level of Service G
Analysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group
Synchro 7 - Report
Page 3
Baseline
Timings
2: State Highway 82 & County Road 100 H :\E587S\Reports\Traffic\Signal for memo\2030 Background AM.syn+*n t t L tj+\{{F
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Tum fype
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Detector Phase
Switch Phase
Minimum lnitial(s)
Minimum Split (s)
Iotal Split (s)
Total Split (%)
Yellow Time (s)
All-Red Time (s)
Lost Time Adjust (s)
Total Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode
Act Effct Green (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
v/c Ratio
ControlDelay
Queue Delay
TotalDelay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS
\
59
Prot
7
4.0
9.0
15.0
8.3%
4.0
1.0
-1.0
4.0
Lead
None
10.6
0.06
0.60
104.2
0.0
104.2
F
t+
2491
4
Min
116.2
0.66
1.15
103.5
0.0
103.5
F
99.1
F
122
Perm
142
Prot
3
3
20.0
26.0
120.0
66.7%
5.0
1.0
-2.0
4.0
Lag
4.0
9.0
25.0
13.9%
4.0
1.0
-1.0
4.0
Lead
None
19.6
0.1 1
0.78
101.4
0.0
101.4
F
20.0
26.0
130.0
72.2Y0
5.0
1.0
-2.0
4.0
Lag
Min
125.2
0.71
0.27
9.5
0.0
9.5
A
26.2
c
20.0
26.0
130.0
72.2Y0
5.0
1.0
-2.0
4,0
Lag
4.0
10.0
35.0
19.4o/o
4.0
2.0
-1.0
5.0
None
26.4
0.15
0.82
1 03.1
0.0
103.1
F
34.5
C
0.0%
4.0
10.0
35.0
19.4Y0
4.0
2.0
-1.0
5.0
ft)
31
6
6
4.0
10.0
35.0
19.4To
4.0
2.0
-1.0
5.0
3689
Perm
I
6
Perm
630 290
.t
55
2
2
b
6
2
2
B
I
B
8
Free Perm
Free
74
4
4
200
26.0
120.0
66.7%
5.0
1,0
-2.0
4.0
Lag
Min
116.2
0.66
012
6.5
0.0
6.5
A
4.0
10.0
35.0
19.40/o
4.0
2.0
-1.0
5.0
Min None
125.2
0.71
0.01
4.0
0.0
4.0
A
0.0
0.0
4.0
175.2
1.00
0.20
0.3
0.0
0.3
None None
26.4
0.15
0.60
77.6
0.0
77.6
E
77.6
E
Cycle Length: 180
Actuated Cycle Length: '175.2
NaturalCycle: 150
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 1 .1 5
lntersection Signal Delay: 77.3
lntersection Capacity Utilization 1 00.3%
Analysis Period (min) 15
lntersection LOS:E
ICU Level of Service G
t aZ 7; - t*;
I'sE
-r_l+-t a7l sB
and Phases: 2: State 82&Road 100
Synchro 7 - Report
Page 1
Baseline
Queues
2: State Hig hwav 82 & County Road 100 H:\E5875\Reports\Traffi c\Signal for memo\2030 Background AM.syn
j+\t{-+rttl
L4Hd*qti{lr;;,: x.$i::*:.,:ri,,SBL, ' EF.[ : ,.Sffi. [lBL !{BT WEB * tl$[ . NBR $BT,: . , .."..,... ";'se'i
Lane Group Flow (vph) 64 2708 133 154 685 7 157 315 102
v/c Ratio 0.60 '1.15 0.12 0.78 0.27 0.01 0'82 0.20 0'60
Control Delay 104.2 103.5 6.5 101.4 9.5 4.0 103'1 0.3 77.6
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
fotalDelay 104.2 103.5 6.5 101.4 9.5 4.0 103.1 0.3 77.6
Queue Length 50th (ft) 75 -2003 29 178 146 0 179 0 101
Queue Length 95th (ft) #139 #2112 59 #288 178 5 #2Bg 0 173
lntemal Link Dist (ft) 638 10127 117 768
Turn Bay Length (ft) 450 275 350 350
Base Capacity (vph) 111 2347 1071 213 2549 1142 218 1583 193
StarvationCapReductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SpillbackCapReductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
StorageCapReductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.58 1.15 0.12 0.72 0.27 0.01 0.72 0.20 0.53
b!ffiDdii&Ih{,igfltpr.' ,,-,,-. ..,., . ., , . ",,...
- Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Synchro 7 - Report
Page2
Baseline
HCM Signalized lntersection Capacity Analysis
2: State Highway 82 & Countv Road 100 H:\E5875\Reports\Traffic\Signal for memo\2030 Total AM-exist cond.synj -+\ t ts ta t t L I I
LaneConfigurations ri ++ | t| ++ | + +
Volume (vph) 59 2491 124 145 630 6 96 57 303 36 32 27
ldeal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1 .00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 '1.00 1.00 0.85 0.91 0.96
Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1 .00 0.99 0.98
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 1678 1759
Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.86 0.48
Satd. Flow (oerm)1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 1 463 861
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
0.92
64
0
64
0.92
135
23
112
0.92
329
0
0
0.92
29
0
0
0.92
2708
0
2708
0.92
158
0
158
04
0
0
0.92
7
2
5
0.92
685
0
685
0.92 0.92
62
40
455
0.92
35
7
96
0.92
39
0
0
Turn fype
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Prot
9.6
10.6
0.06
5.0
4.0
114.0
1 16.0
0.65
6.0
8.0
Perm
4
114.0
1 16.0
0.65
6.0
8.0
19.0
20.0
0.1 1
5.0
4.0
123.4
125.4
0.70
6.0
8.0
B
123.4
125.4
0.70
6,0
8.0
29.0
30.0
0.17
6,0
4,0
29.0
30.0
0.17
6.0
4.0
74 6
Perm
2
PermPermProt
3 8
2 6
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, dl
Progression Factor
lncremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
lffi lnri$ srr,.l.,'.'';1; ; v;; iii; ;
105
0.04
0.61
82.2
1.00
11.1
93.3
F
2293
c0.77
1.18
31.5
1.00
86.3
117.8
F
112.3
F
1026
0.07
0.1 1
11.9
1.00
0.2
12.1
B
198
c0.09
0.80
77.5
1.00
20.7
98.2
F
2479
0.1 I
0,28
10.0
1.00
0.3
10.2
B
26.s
C
1 109
0.00
0.00
8.0
1.00
0.0
8.1
A
245 144
c0.3'l
1,86
74.5
1.00
401.1
475.6
F
475.6
F
0.11
0.66
69.8
1.00
12.0
81.7
F
81.7
F
j'-": : r .. ;,lj{ r.
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
I ntersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group
136.2
1.26
179.0
117.9Yo
15
HCM Level of Service
Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service
F
13.0
H
Synchro 7 - Report
Page 3
Baseline
Timings
2: State Highway 82 & County Bqeq 100 H:\E5875\Reports\Traffic\Signal for memoU030 Total AM-exist cond.syn
) + \ t ts t- a t \ t
LaneConfigurations I t+ | \ ++ | + +
Volume (vph) 59 2491 124 145 630 6 96 57 36 32
Turn Type Prot Perm Prot Perm Perm Perm
ProtectedPhases 7 4 3 8 2 6
PermittedPhases 4 I 2 6
DetectorPhase 7 4 4 3 I 8 2 2 6 6
Switch Phase
Minimum lnitial (s) 4.0 20.0 20.0 4.0 20,0 20.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Minimum Split (s) 9.0 26.0 26.0 9.0 26.0 26.0 10.0 10.0 10,0 10.0
Total Split (s) 1 5.0 1 20.0 120.0 25.0 1 30.0 1 30.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0
Total Split (%) 8.3% 66.7Y0 66.7T0 13.9Y0 72.2% 72.2o/o 19.4Y0 19.4Yo 19.4% 19.4Yo
Yellow Time (s)
All-Red Time (s)
Lost Time Adjust (s)
Total Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag 0ptimize?
RecallMode
Act Effct Green (s)
Actuated giC Ratio
v/c Ratio
ControlDelay
Queue Delay
TotalDelay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS
4.0 5.01.0 1.0-1.0 -2.0
4.0 4.0
Lead Lag
None
10.6
0.06
0.61
106.4
0.0
106.4
F
Min
1 16.0
0.65
1.18
116.5
0.0
116.5
F
111.2
F
5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4,01.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0-2.0 -1.0 -2.0 -2.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0
4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Lag Lead Lag Lag
Min
1'16.0
0,65
0.13
6.6
0.0
6.6
A
None
20.0
0.1 1
0.80
104.8
0.0
104.8
F
Min
125.4
0.70
0.28
10.3
0.0
10.3
B
27.8
C
Min
125.4
0.70
0.01
4.0
0.0
4.0
A
None None
30.0
0.17
1.7 4
380 5
0.0
380.5
F
380.5
None None
30.0
0.17
0.68
86.7
0.0
86.7
F
86.7
F
Cycle Length: 180
Actuated Cycle Length: 179
Natural Cycle: 140
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.74
lntersection Signal Delay: 125.0
I ntersection Capacity Uti lization 1 17 .9o/o
Analysis Period (min) 15
lntersection LOS: F
ICU Level of Service H
and Phases: 2: State H 82&Road 100
t aZ {* l*o4
}sE I ,t l*,,
Synchro 7 - Report
Page 1
Baseline
Queues
2: State Highway 82 & County Road 100 H:\E5875\Reports\Traffic\Signalfor memo\2030 TotalAM-exist mnd.syn
)+\l-.-ttl
lffi*a.;irffi;;:.s,,, ffi**M;fi&&irr.ffi8,..,,V,*El,; ;,,!!&[r,,$lBB.r;'{Wi, , ,EB"T" r. ..:' : ,,;., ,,
Lane Group Flow (vph)
v/c Ratio
ControlDelay
Queue Delay
fotal Delay
Queue Length 50th (ft)
Queue Length 95th (ft)
lntemal Link Dist (fl)
Turn Bay Length (ft)
Base Capacity (vph)
Starvation Cap Reductn
Spillback Cap Reductn
Storage Cap Reductn
Reduced v/c Ratio
64
0.61
106.4
0.0
106.4
75
#139
450
109
0
0
0
0.59
2708
1.18
116.5
0.0
1 16.5
-2017
#2112
638
2294
0
0
0
1,18
135
0.13
6.6
0.0
b.b
30
59
158
0.80
104.8
0.0
104.8
184
#298
685
0.28
10.3
0.0
10.3
148
178
10127
7
0.01
4.0
0.0
4.0
0
5
495
1.74
380.5
0.0
380.5
-81 I
#1061
117
103
0.68
86.7
0.0
86.7
'106
#1 98
768
0.68
350
0.0
b
0
0
0
1
1 52
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.13
350
208 249100
0000
0.76 0.27
275
049 285
0
0
0
1.74
tiit *iLi,:"'".;.,,i;ii ;;)';: ;::,',; i ' ;, :-:;,,1,,..
- Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Synchro 7 - Report
Page2
Baseline
HCtU Signalized lntersection Capacity Analysis
2: State Hishway 82 & County Road 100 H:\E5875\Reports\Traffic\Signal for memo\2030 Total AM.syn
)\ t ts +-\ t t L t I+
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
ldeal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
59
1 900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.95
1770
2491
1 900
4,0
0.95
1,00
1.00
3539
1.00
3539
124
1 900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1 583
1.00
1 583
145
1 900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.95
1770
630
1 900
4.0
0.95
1.00
1,00
3539
1.00
3539
I
6
1 900
4.0
1,00
0.85
1.00
1 583
1.00
1 583
+
32
1 900
5.0
1.00
0.96
0.98
1 759
0.59
1 053
27
1 900
-f
57
1 900
5.0
1.00
1.00
0.97
1 806
0,68
1266
303
1 900
4.0
1.00
0.85
100
1 583
1.00
1 583
96
1 900
36
1 900
Peak-hourfactor, PHF
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
0.92
'135
22
113
0.92
158
0
158
0.92 0.92 0.920.92
685
0
685
0.92
64
0
64
0.92
2708
0
2708
7
2
5
04
0
0
62
166
0.92
329
0
329
0.92
29
0
0
0.92
35
8
95
0.92
39
0
0
0
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
PermPermProt
7
Perm Prot PermFree
62
9.6
10.6
0.06
5.0
4.0
4
114.2
116.2
0.66
6.0
8.0
4
114.2
116.2
0.66
b.u
8.0
18.8
19.8
0.11
5.0
4.0
123.4
125.4
0.71
6.0
8.0
I
123.4
125.4
0.71
6.0
8.0
2
26.3
27.3
0.1 5
6.0
4,0
Free
176.3
176.3
1.00
26,3
27.3
0.15
6.0
4.0
38 6
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 106 2333 1043 199 2517 1126 196 1583 163
v/s Ratio Prot 0.04 c0.77 c0.09 0.19
v/s Ratio Penn 0.07 0.00 c0.13 0.21 0.09
v/c Ratio 0.60 1.16 0,11 0.79 0,27 0.00 0.85 0.21 0,59
Uniform Delay, dl 80.8 30.1 11.0 76.3 9.1 7.4 72.5 0.0 69.2
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 ,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
lncremental Delay, d2 10.7 77.5 0.2 20.2 0.3 0.0 28.0 0.3 6.2
Delay (s) 91,5 107.6 11.2 96.5 9.4 7.4 100.5 0.3 75.5
LevelofService F F B F A A F A E
Approach Delay (s) 102.8 25.5 33.9 75.5
ApproachlOS F C C E
HCM Average Control Delay 79.2 HCM Level of Service E
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.06
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 176.3 Sum of lost time (s) 1 3.0
lntersection Capacity Utilization 101.5% ICU Level of Service G
Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
Synchro 7 - Report
Page 3
Baseline
Timings
2: State Highway 82 & County Road 100 H:\E5875\Reports\Trafflc\Signal for memo\2030 Total AM.syn
)+\ t +\a t t rt
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
furn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Detector Phase
Switch Phase
Minimum lnitial (s)
Minimum Split (s)
Total Split (s)
Total Split (%)
Yellow Time (s)
All-Red Time (s)
Lost Time Adjust (s)
Total Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode
Act Effct Green (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
v/c Ratio
ControlDelay
Queue Delay
TotalDelay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS
\++59 2491
Prot74
Perm Perm
.tl57 303 36
Free Perm
2 Free 626
f
124
Perm
I'i
145
Prot
3
96
74
4
4
20.0
26.0
120.0
66.7%
5.0
1.0
-2.0
4.0
Lag
Min
116.1
0.66
0.1 3
6.5
0.0
6.5
A
3
8
8
8
B
6
6
2
2
4.0
9.0
15.0
8.3%
4.0
1.0
-1.0
4.0
Lead
None
10.6
0,06
0.60
105.0
0.0
105.0
F
20.0
26.0
120.0
66.7%
5.0
1.0
-2.0
4.0
Lag
Min
116.1
0.66
1.16
107.0
0.0
107.0
F
102.3
F
4,0
9.0
25.0
13.9To
4.0
1.0
-1,0
4.0
Lead
None
19.8
0.11
0.79
103.1
0.0
103.1
F
20.0
26.0
130.0
72.2o/o
5.0
1.0
-2.0
4.0
Lag
Min
12s.3
0.71
0.27
9.7
0.0
9.7
A
27.0
c
20.0
26.0
130.0
72.2To
5.0
1.0
-2.0
4.0
Lag
Min
125.3
0.71
0.01
4,0
0.0
4.0
A
4.0
10.0
35,0
19.4o/o
4.0
2.0
-1 0
5.0
4.0
10.0
35.0
19.4Y0
4.0
2.0
-1.0
5.0
4,0
10.0
35.0
4.0
10.0
35.0
9.4%
4.0
2.0
-1.0
5.0
0.0
0.0%
0.0
4.0
t.4%
4.0
2.0
-1.0
5.0
'19
None None
27.3
0.15
0,85
106.2
0,0
106.2
F
35.8
D
None None
27.3
0.1 5
0.60
78.9
0.0
78.9
E
78,9
E
176.2
1.00
0.21
0.3
0.0
0.3
A
Cycle Length: 180
Actuated Cycle Length: 176.2
Natural Cycle: 140
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordi nated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.16
lntersection Signal Delay: 79,5 lntersection LOS: E
lntersection Capacity Utilization 101.5% ICU Level of Service G
Analysis Period (min) 15
and Phases: 2: State 82&Road 100
t aE II
Baseline Synchro 7 - Report
Page 1
630 6
s
32
1
Queues
2: State Hig hwav 82 & County Road 100 H:\E5875\Reports\Traffic\Signal for memo\2030 Total AM.syn
i +\{{-\t
583
0.55n0
t t
Lane Group Flow (vph)
v/c Ratio
ControlDelay
Queue Delay
Total Delay
Queue Length 50th (ft)
Queue Length 95th (ft)
lntemal Link Dist (ft)
Turn Bay Length (ft)
Base Capacity (vph)
Starvation Cap Reductn
Spillback Cap Reductn
Storage Cap Reductn
Reduced v/c Ratio
64
0,60
105.0
0.0
105.0
75
#1 39
2708
1.16
107.0
0.0
107.0
-2017
#2112
638
135
0.13
6.5
0.0
6.5
30
59
275
1 065
0
0
0
0.1 3
. . ...'',.
158
0.79
103.1
0.0
103.1
184
#298
7
0.01
4.0
0.0
4.0
0
5
350
1135
0
0
0
0.01
'166
0.85
106.2
0,0
106.2
191
#316
117
216
0
0
0
0.77
329
0.21
0.3
0.0
0.3
0
0
103
0.60
78.9
0.0
78.9
104
178
768
450
685
0.27
9.7
0.0
9.7
148
178
10127
350
211 2533000000
0,75 0.27
0
0
0
16
10
0
0
0
58
2332 187
0
0
0
0
0
0
21
- Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer,
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Synchro 7 - Report
Page2
Baseline
1
HCM Signalized lntersection Capacity Analysis
2: State Highway 82 & County Road 100HiE5875\Reports\Traffic\Signal for memo\2030 Background PM-exist cond.syn
i +\ t +- +-a t t L I I
efiil;:ri,- i;i'1,;1 1j,;i:,'r,,E$Lrt;ffi.ffi:i fo).;, 'l;ro;SHL' ,, !l$I, ;ir;MlBir',;fhL,'; .rSBT,,i.,,i*BB
LaneConfisurations \ ++ | \ ++ | + S
Volume (vph) 27 896 65 561 2343 13 162 50 262 5 10 19
ldeal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4,0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.93 0.92
Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 '1,00 0.98 0.99
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 1695 1708
Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.88 0.90
Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 3539 '1583 1770 3539 1583 1521 1556
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
0.92
29
0
29
0.92
71
26
45
0.92
14
3
11
0.92
176
0
0
0.92
11
17
20
0.92
21
0
0
0.92
974
0
974
0.92
610
0
610
0.92
2547
0
2547
0.92
54
25
490
0.92
285
0
0
0.92
5
0
0
Tum Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
b
PermProt
3
Prot
7
7.3
8.3
0.05
5.0
4.0
4
111,4
113.4
0.64
6.0
8.0
Perm
4
111.4
113.4
0.64
6.0
8.0
20.0
21.0
0.12
5.0
4.0
8
124.1
126.1
0.71
6.0
8.0
Perm Perm
I
124.1
126.1
0.71
6.0
8.0
b2
2
29.0
30,0
0.17
6.0
4.0
29.0
30.0
0.17
6.0
4.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
lncremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
83
0.02
2262
0.28
0.43
15.9
1.00
0.6
16.5
B
18.1
B
1012
0.03
0.04
11.9
1.00
0.1
12.0
B
210
c0.34
251 6
c0.72
1125
0,01
0.01
7.5
1.00
0.0
7.5
A
257
c0.32
1.91
73.7
1.00
422.3
496.0
F
496.0
F
263
0.01
0.07
62.0
1,00
0.2
62.2
E
ot.t
E
0.35
81.9
1.00
3.5
85.4
F
2.90
78.2
1,00
870.0
948.2
F
101
25.7
1.00
21.0
46.7
D
219.9
t-
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
I ntersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group
203.2
1.40
177.4
113.3%
15
HCM Level of Service
Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service
F
9.0
H
Synchro 7 - Report
Page 3
Baseline
.t: l, '
Timings
2: State Hig hway 82 & County Road 1 00 HlEs87s\Reports\Traffi c\Signal for memo\2030 Background PM-exist cond'syn
)+\{ts\atLt
LaneConfigurations t ++ | t ++ | + +
Volume (vph) 27 896 65 561 2343 13 162 50 5 10
Turn Type Prot Perm Prot Perm Perm Perm
ProtectedPhases 7 4 3 8 2 6
PermittedPhases 4 8 2 6
DetectorPhase 7 4 4 3 8 I 2 2 6 6
Switch Phase
Minimum lnitial (s) 4,0 20.0 20.0 4.0 20.0 20.0 4,0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Minimum Split (s) 9.0 26.0 26.0 9.0 26.0 26.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0
Total Split (s) 15,0 120.0 120.0 25.0 130.0 130.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0
Total Split (%) 8.3% 66.7% 66.70/0 13.9% 72.2Y0 72.2% 19.4% 19.4Y0 19.4Yo 19.4To
Yellow Time (s) 4.0 5.0 5.0 4,0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) -1.0 -2.0 -2.0 -1.0 -2.0 -2.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?RecallMode None Min Min None Min Min None None None None
Act Effct Green (s) 9.7 112.4 112.4 21.0 126.2 126.2 30.0 30.0
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.05 0.64 0.64 0,12 0.72 0.72 0.17 0.17
v/c Ratio
ControlDelay
Queue Delay
TotalDelay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS
0.30
89.1
0.0
89.1
F
0.43
16.7
0.0
16.7
B
17.7
B
0.07
2.4
0.0
2.4
A
886,7
0.0
886.7
F
44.8
0.0
44.8
D
206.6
F
2.89 1.0'r 0.01 1.81 0.13
414.9 35.4
0.0 0.0
414.9 35.4FD414.9 35.4FD
, .,: ,, ,1: :r'l . '
"'j .-r.rlr r-&- :'-,,
4.5
0.0
4.5
A
in$fuonsununarv ''"
Cycle Length: 180
Actuated Cycle Length: 176.5
Natural Cycle: 150
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 2.89
lntersection Signal Delay: 185.3
lntersection Capacity Utilization 1 13.3o/o
Analysis Period (min) 15
lntersection LOS: F
ICU Level of Service H
.+laZ---------------l
I aE ) ,t l*,,
and Phases: 2: State 82&Road 100
Synchro 7 - Report
Page 1
Baseline
.: -:;..'::! '.'
Queues
2: State Highway 82 & County Road 100H:\E5875\Reports\Traffic\Signalfor memoV030 Background PM-exist cond.syn
j+\+-tsttt
Lane Group Flow (vph) 29 974 71 610 2547 14 515 37
vic Ratio 0.30 0.43 0.07 2.89 1.01 0.01 1.81 0.13
ControlDelay 89.1 16.7 2.4 886.7 44.8 4.5 414.9 35.4
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 89.1 16.7 2.4 886.7 44.8 4.5 414.9 35.4
Queue Length 50th (ft) 33 284 0 -1233 -1671 1 -889 16
Queue Length 95th (ft) 73 331 20 #1491 #1785 10 #1139 55
lnternal Link Dist (ft) 638 10127 117 768
Turn Bay Length (ft) 450 275 350 350
Base Capacity (vph) 1 10 2329 1066 211 2530 1134 284 282
StarvationCapReductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SpillbackCapReductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
StorageCapReductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0,26 0.42 0.07 2.89 1.01 0.01 1.81 0.13
- Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Synchro 7 - Report
Page2
Baseline
HCM Signalized lntersection Capacity Analysis
2: State Highway 82 & County Road 100 H:\E5875\Reports\Trafflc\Signalfor memo\2030 Background PM.syn
i +\ t F \a t t L t I
LaneConfigurations \ ++ | \ +t | -t | +
Volume (vph) 27 896 65 561 2343 13 162 50 262 5 10 19
ldeal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4,0 4.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0
Lane Util. Factor 1 .00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 1 .00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 0,92
Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1,00 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.99
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 1794 1583 1708
Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.78 1.00 0.91
Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 1447 1583 1567
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
0.92
71
26
45
0.92
29
0
29
0.92
974
0
974
0.92
610
0
610
0.92
2547
0
2547
0.92
176
0
0 230
0.92
21
0
0
0.92
14
3
11
0,92
11
17
20
0.92 0.92 0.92
285
0
285
54
0
5
0
0
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
2
Prot
3
Prot
7
Perm
4
11 1.5
113,5
0.64
6.0
8.0
Perm Perm Free Perm
b
7.3
8.3
0.05
5.0
4.0
4
111.5
1 13.5
0.64
6.0
8.0
20.0
21.0
0.12
5.0
4.0
124.2
126.2
0.71
6,0
8.0
B
124.2
126.2
0.71
6.0
8.0
28.8
29.8
0.17
6.0
4.0
Free
177.3
177.3
1.00
28.8
29.8
0.17
6.0
4.0
8 6
2
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
lncremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
83
0.02
2266
0.28
0.43
15.8
1.00
0.6
16.4
B
18,0
B
2519
c0.72
1.01
25.6
1.00
20.7
46.3
D
219.6
F
1127
0.01
0.01
7.4
1.00
0.0
7.4
A
'101 3 210
c0.34
0.03
0.04
11.8
1.00
0.1
11.9
B
243 1583
c0.1 6
0.95
73.0
1.00
43.1
1 16.0
F
52.0
D
0.18
0.18
0.0
1.00
0.2
0.2
A
263
0.01
0.07
62.1
1.00
0.2
62.3
E
62.3
E
0.35
81.9
1.00
3.5
85.3
F
2.90
78.2
1.00
870,0
948.2
F
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
lntersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group
155.2
1.23
177,3
97.2%
15
HCM Level of Service
Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service
F
F
9.0
Synchro 7 - Report
Page 3
Baseline
Timings
2: State Hig hway 82 & County Road 100 HlE5875\Reports\Traffic\Signal for memoU030 Background PM.syn
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Detector Phase
Switch Phase
Minimum lnitial(s)
Minimum Split (s)
Total Split (s)
Total Split (%)
Yellow Time (s)
All-Red Time (s)
Lost Time Adjust (s)
Total Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
RecallMode
Act Effct Green (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
v/c Ratio
ControlDelay
Queue Delay
Total Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS
)
T
27
Prot
7
+\{
561
Prot
3
\a t t L t{-
2343
8
8
13
Perm
162
Perm
5
c+'
10
24
Free Perm
Free
6
74
4
4
20.0
26.0
120.0
66.7Y0
5.0
't.0
-2.0
4.0
Lag
Min
112.4
0.64
0.07
2.4
0.0
2.4
A
3
2
2
8
I 2
o
6 6
4,0
9.0
15.0
8.3%
4.0
1.0
-1.0
4.0
Lead
None
9.7
0.06
0.30
89.1
0.0
89.1
F
20.0
26.0
120.0
66.7Y0
5.0
1.0
-2.0
4.0
Lag
Min
112.4
0.64
0.43
16.6
0.0
16,6
B
17.6
B
4.0
9.0
25.0
13.9%
4.0
1.0
-1.0
4.0
Lead
None
21.0
0.12
2.89
884.2
0.0
884.2
F
20.0
26.0
130.0
72.2%
5,0
1.0
-2.0
4.0
Lag
Min
126.1
0.72
1.01
44.4
0.0
44.4
D
205.7
F
20.0
26.0
130.0
72.2Y0
5.0
1.0
-2.0
4.0
Lag
4.0
10.0
35.0
19.4Y0
4.0
2.0
-1.0
5.0
4.0
10.0
35.0
19.4%
4.0
2.0
-1.0
5.0
4.0
10.0
35.0
4.0
10.0
35.0
9.AYo
4.0
2.0
-1.0
5.0
None
29,8
0.17
0.13
35.6
0.0
35.6
D
35.6
D
0.0
0.0% 1
176.2
1,00
0.18
0.2
0.0
0.2
A
9.4%
0.0
4.0
4.0
2.0
-1.0
5.0
NoneMin None
126.1
0.72
0.01
4.5
0.0
4.5
None
29.8
0.17
0.94
115.1
0,0
115.1
F
5'1.5
D
Cycle Length: 180
Actuated Cycle Length: 176.2
Natural Cycle: 130
Control Type : Actuated-Uncoordi nated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 2.89
lntersection Signal Delay: 145.8 lntersection LOS: F
lntersection Capacity Ulilizalion 97 .2% ICU Level of Service F
Analysis Period (min) 15
its and Phases: 2: State Hi,82&Road 100
s4tsZF;l*;t,sE
Synchro 7 - Report
Page 1
Baseline
.t
5089665
Perm
Queues
2: State Hig hwav 82 & County Road 100 H:\E5875\Reports\Traffic\Signal for memo\2030 Background PM.syn
.r+\tts\ttt
HHSiffF,..;*:,t'.,,' ,.EBL,,EB,[,,,,*"E8R ,ttrBL-rlilEf'+^,'r$6ffirL.ffihr.Nffi .88[ . , ,:";i.,:t
Lane Group Flow (vph) 29 974 71 610 2547 14 230 285 37
v/c Ratio 0.30 0.43 0.07 2.89 1.01 0.01 0.94 0.18 0.13
ControlDelay
Queue Delay
Total Delay
Queue Length 50th (ft)
Queue Length 95th (ft)
lntemal Link Dist (ft)
Turn Bay Length (ft)
Base Capacity (vph)
Starvation Cap Reductn
Spillback Cap Reductn
Storage Cap Reductn
Reduced v/c Ratio
2.4 884.20.0 0.0
2.4 884.20 -1233
20 #1491
275 350
89.1
0.0
89.1
33
73
450
111
0
0
0
0.26
16.6
0.0
16.6
284
331
638
2333
0
0
0
0.42
44.4
0.0
44.4
-167 1
#1785
10127
4.5
0.0
4.5
1
10
350
115.1
0.0
115.1
272
#458
117
0.2
0.0
0.2
0
0
35.6
0.0
35.6
16
55
768
1067 21
0 2.89 1 .01 0.01 0.93 0.1 I
0
0
0
07
1 2533 1136 247 1583
000000000000000
285
0
0
0
0.13
- Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Synchro 7 - Report
Page 2
Baseline
HCM Signal
2: State Hig
lized lntersection Capacity Ana
rhwav 82 & County Road 100
lysis
H :\E5875\Reports\Traffic\Sign al for memo\2030 Total PM-exist cond.syn
i \{+-a t t \'+ J++
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
ldeal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
27
1 900
4,0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.95
1770
896
1 900
4.0
0.95
1.00
1.00
3539
1.00
3539
f
72
1 900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1,00
1 583
1.00
1 583
575
1 900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.95
1770
2343
1 900
4.0
0.95
1.00
1.00
3539
1.00
3539
I
13
1 900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1 583
1.00
1 583
271
1 900
clt
13
1 900
5.0
100
0.93
0.99
1720
0.91
1 576
19
1 900
+
51
1 900
5.0
1.00
0.93
0.98
1 694
0.88
1517
167
1 900
5
1 900
Satd. Flow (perm
Peak-hour factor, PHF
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
295
0
0
82
0
0
92
29
0
29
0.92
974
0
974
0.92
625
0
625
0.92
2547
0
2547
0.92 0,92
55
25
507
0.92
78
28
50
0.92
14
3
11
0.92
14
17
23
0.92 0.92 0.92
Lane Group Flow (voh)
5
0
0
21
0
0
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Prot
7
Perm Prot Perm Perm Perm
7.3
8.3
0.05
5.0
4.0
111.4
113.4
0.64
6.0
8.0
4
111.4
113.4
0,64
6.0
8.0
20.0
21.0
0.12
5.0
4.0
124.1
126.1
0.71
6.0
8.0
8
124.1
126.1
0.71
6.0
8.0
2
29.0
30.0
0.17
6.0
4.0
29.0
30.0
0.17
6.0
4,0
4 38 6
62
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
lncremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
83
0.02
2262
0.28
0.43
15.9
1.00
0.6
16.5
B
18.0
B
1012
0.03
0.05
11.9
1.00
0.1
12.0
B
210
c0.35
2.98
78.2
1.00
902.0
980.2
F
251 6
c0.72
1.01
25.7
100
21.0
46.7
D
229.6
F
1125 257 267
0.35
81.9
100
3.5
85.4
F
0.0'l
0.01
7.5
1.00
0.0
7.5
A
c0.33
1.97
73.7
1.00
451.6
525.3
F
525,3
F
0.0'1
0.08
62.1
't.00
0.2
62.3
E
62.3
E
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
I ntersection Capacity Uti lization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group
213.5
1.42
177.4
114.2%
tc
HCM Level of Service
Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service
F
9.0
H
Synchro 7 - Report
Page 3
Baseline
0
Timings
2: State Highway 82 & County Road 100 H:\E5875\Reports\Traffic\Signal for memo\2030 fotal PM-exist cond.syn
)---I\tFt-\tLl
LaneConfigurations \ ++ f tl ++ f + +
Volume (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Detector Phase
Switch Phase
Minimum lnitial(s)
Minimum Split (s)
Total Split (s)
TotalSplit (%)
Yellow Time (s)
All-Red Time (s)
Lost Time Adjust (s)
Total Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
RecallMode
Act Effct Green (s)
Actuated giC Ratio
v/c Ratio
Control Delay
Queue Delay
Total Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS
5.0 4.0 5.01.0 1.0 1.0-2.0 -1.0 -2.0
4.0 4.0 4.0
Lag Lead Lag
4,0 4.0 4.0 4.0
2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0-1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0
5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
27
Prot
7
7
4.0
9.0
15.0
8.3%
4.0
1.0
-1,0
4.0
Lead
896
4
4
20.0
26.0
120.0
66.7%
72
Perm
4
4
20.0
26,0
120,0
66,7%
575
Prot
3
J
4.0
9.0
25.0
13.9%
2343
8
8
20.0
26.0
130.0
72.2%
13
Perm
I
I
20.0
26.0
130,0
72.2%
5.0
1,0
-2.0
4.0
Lag
167
Perm
2
2
4.0
10.0
35.0
19.4%
51
2
2
4.0
10.0
35.0
19.4To
5
Perm
6
6
4.0
10.0
35,0
19.4%
13
b
b,
4.0
10.0
35.0
19.4%
5.0
1.0
-2.0
4.0
Lag
None Min Min None Min Min None None None None
9.7 112.4 112.4 21.0 126.2 126.2 30.0 30.0
0.05 0.64 0.64 0.12 0.72 0.72 0.17 0.17
0.30 0.43 0.08 2.96 1.01 0.01 1.88 0.14
89.1 16.7 2.3 917.9 44.8 4.5 442.5 37.30,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
89.1 16.7 2.3 917.9 44.8 4.5 442.5 37.3FBAFDAFD17.6 215.9 M2.5 37.3BFFD
Cycle Length: 180
Actuated Cycle Length: 176.5
NaturalCycle: 150
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 2.96
lntersection Signal Delay: 195,0 lntersection LOS: F
lntersection Capacity Utilization 114.2o/o ICU Level of Service H
Analysis Period (min) 15
and Phases: 2: State H 82&Road 100
t aZ {* l*s4
t'sE /r, l*sB
Synchro 7 - Report
Page 1
Baseline
Queues
2: State Hig hwav 82 & County Road 100 H:\E5875\Reports\rraffic\sign al for memo\2030 Total PM-exist cond,syn
ts \
Lac€fd,B . , i" qi-I-.,'-EBI EBR yllBL SIBT I4IBR "'NBr SBT. . . - .:
Lane Group Flow (vph) 29 974 78 625 2547 14 532 40
v/c Ratio 0.30 0.43 0.08 2.96 1'01 0.01 1.88 0,14
{\+)t I
Control Delay
Queue Delay
Total Delay
Queue Length 50th (ft)
Queue Length 95th (ft)
lntemal Link Dist (ft)
Turn Bay Length (ft)
Base Capacity (vph)
2.3 917.9
0.0 0.0
2.3 917.90 -1270
21 #1528
4.5
0.0
4.5
1
10
350
2530 1134 283
000000000
442.5 37.30.0 0.0
442.5 37.3-932 19
#1184 59117 768
16.7
0.0
16.7
284
331
638
450 275 350
1 1 0 2329 '1069 21
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.26 0.42 0.07 2.96 1.01 0.01 1.88
89.1
0.0
89.1
33
73
44.8
0.0
44.8
-1671
#1 785
10127
I
U
0
0
286
0
0
0
0.14
- Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Synchro 7 - Report
Page2
Baseline
HCM Signalized lntersection Capacity Analysis
2: State Hig hwav 82 & County Road 100 H:\E5875\Reports\Trafflc\Signal for memo\2030 Total PM.syn
.r \{+-a t t L I t{-
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
ldeal Flow (vphpl)
Total Lost time (s)
Lane Util. Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
27
1 900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.95
1770
++
896
1 900
4.0
0.95
1.00
1.00
3539
1.00
3539
I
72
1 900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1 583
1.00
1 583
575
1 900
4.0
1.00
1.00
0.95
1770
0.95
1770
2343
1 900
4.0
0.95
1.00
1.00
3539
'1.00
3539
I
13
1 900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1 583
1.00
1 583
167
1 900
.t
51
1 900
5.0
1.00
1.00
0.96
1794
0.77
1432
f
271
1 900
4.0
1.00
0.85
1.00
1 583
1.00
1 583
+
13
1 900
5.0
1.00
0.93
0.99
1720
0.90
1 549
5
1 900
19
1 900
Satd. Flow (perm
Peak-hourfactor, PHF
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
0.92
295
0
295
0.92
55
0
237
92
5
0
0
82
0
0
0.92
29
0
29
0.92
974
0
974
0.92
78
28
50
0.92
14
3
11
0.92
14
17
23
0.92
21
0
0
0.92 0.92
625 2547
00
625 2547
0.92
Lane Group Flow (voh)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
b
PermFree
2
Prot
3
Prot
7
Perm Perm Perm
8
124.1
126.1
0.71
6.0
8.0
4 B
7.3
8.3
0.05
5.0
4.0
111.4
113.4
0.64
6.0
8,0
4
111.4
113.4
0.64
6.0
8.0
20.0
21.0
012
5.0
4.0
124.1
126.1
0.71
6.0
8.0
29.0
30.0
0.17
6.0
4.0
Free
177.4
177.4
1.00
29.0
30.0
0.17
6.0
4.0
b2
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
v/s Ratio Prot
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio
Uniform Delay, d1
Progression Factor
lncremental Delay, d2
Delay (s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
83
0.02
2262
0.28
0.43
15.9
1.00
0.6
16.5
B
18.0
B
1012
0.03
0,05
11.9
1.00
0.1
12.0
B
210
c0.35
2516
c0.72
1125 242 1583 262
0.35
8'1.9
1.00
3.5
85.4
F
2.98
78.2
1.00
902.0
980.2
F
1 .01
25.7
1.00
21.0
46.7
D
229.6
F
0.01
0.01
7.5
1,00
0.0
7.5
A
c0.17
0.98
73.4
1.00
51.6
125.0
F
55.8
E
0.19
0.19
0.0
1.00
0.3
0.3
A
0.01
0.09
62.1
1.00
0.2
62.3
E
62.3
E
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
I ntersection Capacity Uti lization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group
161 .9
1.24
177.4
97.5Y0
15
HCM Level of Service
Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service
9.0
F
F
Synchro 7 - Report
Page 3
Baseline
Timings
2: State Hig hway 82 & County Road 100 HlE587S\Reports\Traffic\Signal for memo\2030 Total PM'syn\a t t r t\{+t +
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Detector Phase
Switch Phase
Minimum lnitial (s)
Minimum Split (s)
Total Split (s)
IotalSplit (%)
Yellow Time (s)
All-Red Time (s)
Lost Time Adjust (s)
fotal Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
RecallMode
Act Effct Green (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
v/c Ratio
ControlDelay
Queue Delay
TotalDelay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS
\
27
Prot
7
7
896
20.0
26.0
120.0
66.7%
5.0
1.0
-2.0
4.0
Lag
4
4
72
Perm
4
4
\
575
Prot
3
J
++
2343
I
I
13
Perm
167
Perm
None
+i
13
6
6
4.0
10.0
35.0
19.4To
4.0
2.0
-1.0
5.0
5
Perm
6
6
2
2
.t
51
2
2
I
271
Free
FreeB
I
4.0
9.0
15.0
8.3%
4,0
1.0
-1.0
4.0
Lead
None
9.7
0.05
0.30
89.1
0.0
89.'l
F
20.0
26.0
120.0
66,7o/o
5.0
1.0
-2.0
4.0
Lag
4.0
9.0
25.0
13.9%
4.0
1.0
-'1.0
4.0
Lead
None
21.0
0.12
2.96
917.9
0.0
917.9
F
20.0
26.0
'130.0
72.2o/o
5.0
1.0
-2.0
4.0
Lag
Min
126.2
0.72
1.01
44.8
0.0
44.8
D
215.9
F
20.0
26.0
130.0
72.2Y0
5.0
1.0
-2.0
4.0
Lag
Min
126.2
0.72
0.01
4.5
0.0
4.5
A
4.0
10.0
35.0
19.4%
4.0
2.0
-1.0
5.0
4.0
10.0
35.0
19.4%
4.0
2.0
-1.0
5.0
None
30.0
0.17
0.97
122.0
0.0
122.0
F
54,5
D
0.0
0.0%
4.0
10.0
35.0
19.4Y0
4.0
2.0
-1.0
5.0
Min
112.4
0.64
0.43
16.7
0.0
16.7
B
17.6
B
Min
112.4
0.64
0.08
2.3
0.0
2.3
A
0.0
4.0
176.5
1,00
0.'19
0.3
0,0
0.3
A
None None
30.0
0.1 7
0.14
37.3
0.0
37.3
D
37.3
D
Cycle Length: 180
Actuated Cycle Length: 176.5
Natural Cycle: 130
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio:2.96
lntersection Signal Delay: 152.4
lntersection Capacity Utilization 97.5%
Analysis Period (min) 15
and Phases: 2: State
lntersection LOS: F
ICU Level of Service F
82 & Cou Road 100
{rt E;t a2
}oE
f+-
s7 I sB
Synchro 7 - Report
Page 1
Baseline
Queues
2: State Hig hwav 82 & County Road 100 HlE5875\Reports\Traffic\Signal for memo\2030 Total PM.syn
i \f {-t t t I+
[9ffiqaup, ,", .j.., E&. EBT . EER \ISL \A,BT I,VBR NBT , }IBR SBT , , .,.
tane Croup Flow (vph) 29 974 78 625 2547 14 237 295 40
vic Ratio
ControlDelay
Queue Delay
Total Delay
Queue Length 50th (ft)
Queue Length 95th (ft)
lnternal Link Dist (ft)
Turn Bay Length (ft)
Base Capacity (vph)
Starvation Cap Reductn
Spillback Cap Reductn
Storage Cap Reductn
Reduced v/c Ratio
0.30
89.1
0.0
89.1
33
73
0.43
16.7
0.0
16.7
284
331
638
0.08
2.3
0.0
2.3
0
21
2.96
917.9
0.0
917.9
-1270
#1528
1.01
44.8
0.0
44.8
-1671
#1 785
10127
0.01
4.5
0.0
4.5
1
10
0,97
122.0
0.0
122.0
283
#478
117
0.19
0.3
0.0
0.3
0
0
0.14
37.3
0.0
37.3
19
59
768
450 275
1 069
0
0
0
0.07
350 350
10
0
0
0
2329
0
0
0
0.42
2 11
0
0
0
96
2530 34 244
0
0
0
0.97
1 583
0
0
0
2 81
0
0
0
140.26 2 .0
0
0
U
1 0.0
0
0
0
1 0.19 0
:. :,1:
- Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Synchro 7 - Report
Page 2
Baseline
t
t
I
I,
J
t
IF
I
I
II
t
t
LEGEND
iHT-S-WAY.......................
xx'sToRM
OPOSM SffiM SEUER,,.,,,., ,,,,,,, @
OPO$D SNITARY SER,,,,,,.,,.,,.,,., .@_
I)POSED WA]ER UNE,, .,,,,,,.,,,,,.,,.,,,,,, _I@
oPosm GAs uNE...... . .............
-c-
ilREo Er.ECmlC UNE.....-....-.
-E-
SURIM TELIPHOIE UNE.,,.,,.,,
-1-
EBER OPNCS UNE ,,,,,.,,..,,,,
-
FOC
-OPOSED OERHEAD POW,/EECnIC
-O€-
oPosD nRE HYDRNT.....-....................... .. . (H
N 81t6.26 eosD waTm v L\E ,,,.,.,,.,,.,,.,,.,,.,.,,,,,,., e
@*otao wa* MEm... .. . . .. . - .... aN 8il6.{€
E--{99!-ZoposD MNHN................... O
oPosD ugT Ptr ..................
x 66oPos€DG*ooo
oPosEo sAN. sEllER SERMCE...............- s
OPOSED S^N. MANHN DESINATOR,,.,
OPOSED STORM INI.IT OESIGNATOR
OPOSED SIORM MANHOE DESIHAToR,,,,,.,,.,,.,,,,,
STW NLWT R il. xx'
RE ilAUEER SWil gffi................ tr =:====l
SW gER EX XX. SW
-sT-
gMrARr gftgR ....................- . " "" w ou
UA1A UNE EX XX"YAR
fuHo UCNE UNE
aURl@ WNELNE
noER encs uNE...... Foc-
omEAD POffi frD trCRC..--..
-
G-
vtu
d
{
*-
o
SWil INI.ET OESNADR
SWilANHMffidAw--. . . .
OPOSEO INEMEIA]E CONTOUR,
CALL UTIUTY NOTIFICATION
CENTER OF COLORADO
1-900- 922-1987
CALL 2-BUSINESS DAYS IN ADVANCE
BEFORE YOU DIG, GRADE, OR EXCAVATE
FOR THE MARKING OF UNDERGROUND
MEMBER UTIUTIES.
PREPARED BY:
-a-44f:
&
xolt! DEarol lTUDl0
-8.-*--
E.o
LL
tnFz
UJ
oo
z.
JL
E.
z
==Uv.L
Ht4{Uz
&
rrlz
F.I
HUH
oo
E,oJ
o
tFz
foo
6)
LrJ
f,
E.
(9
ISSUE DA'TE
oEsrc-|ttD 8Y ccs
DRAY'N B*Jru
CIIECXE) BT ccs
FIT.E NAME 587sSP1
NOT VAUD UTHOUT ORIGINAI
SIGNATURE AND DATE
DRAWNG SCAE:
HoRIZONTAL: X' = XX"
ffNCAL NNE
SITE PI-AN
SHEEI:5 0F X
oPmil
dS UNE
. w. TANHAL€ DEgdA r&.. - - - -. - - - - - - - - - -. - - - -. - -..
OW\.IER/
Permit No. 30g134
16-2 Floyd Strader3l 02
COT"ORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
TSSEEPMRAHWAYccTSTAE
082 A 15.944 R
Stale Highway NoiMP/Side
Local Jurisdiction
td
Date of transmittal
713112008
Permit fee
$100.00
TCI Larne llartch Drexel Ilarrell & Co
Jarttes l)atton
164l I Old I li-eh,,r,ay 82 I l3 N 7lh Street, Suite 300
Calbonclarle, CO 8162i Clcrld Junction' CO 81501
970-963-7017 970-257-1 3s0
is hereby g(anled permission to have an access to the state highway at the location noted below. The access dnan be conslructed, maintained and used in
accordance with this permit, including the state Highway Access Code and
"ny "it"cn*unts,
terms. conditions and exhibits. This permit may be revoked
by the issuing authority it at any time the permitted access and its use viotaie ,"y t"da o1 tnis permit. The issuing authority' lhe Department and their duly
appointed agents and employees shail be held harmless igainst any action lor riel*riiinlr.y'or propeny oama{e suslained by reason ol the exercise ol
the
Ref No.The Permittee(s);Applicant:
et west of mP 16a ciistance of 300on the south side of HwYLocation
Access to Provide Service to: (Ltnd usecodc;)
210 - Sin-sle-Farrrily Detached Housing 17 I units)
2i0 - Residential CondolniniunVTorvnhouse ( l8 units)
Total
(Size ()r Count I
30
l0
40
( Units)
DI{V
DI.IV
DHV
Additional I nformation
MUNICIPALITY OB COUNTY APPROVAL
Required only when the appropriate local authority retains issuing authority
Datent Namealure
being used.
The permittee shall notifv DWavne Gavmon wittr the Colorado
Grand Junction, Colorado at (970) 683'3355, at least 48 hours
the State Highway right-of-waY'
The person signing as the permittee musl be tJ.re olr.ner or legal representative of
accepl the permii and its terms and condiiions-
Departrnent of TransPortation in
prior to commencing construction within
rhe property served by the permitted access and 621's full authority Io
conents nedtaincedreferettachmacoandonsnditianditteermtoerhStermrnofhisit,m theeth agreescperpeUponigng
romth\1/r in 45ahfibeishednanmanerS daysndnanitioudandSafeSshallncombeAIherein.co tructins o pleted expe
ol eth it rior tormcondandilionshwitteSpermptherdancernaccomiaccessttedhalSbecompletedThenttiationpe
t'2(,-oI'Narne
L
ignature
,d--,,;
,h-Etuaq)^C:<-. - f-, ', p--
This permit is not valid until signed by a duly authorized representative
COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
of the Department
(of issue)
41.
Ti
I
Make copies as necessary for:
Local Aulhorily lnspector
MTCE Palrol Trallic Engineer
are obsolele and may nol be used
Copy Distribution: R
LBegion
2.Applicanl
3.Staff Access Section
4.Central Files
Previous
Page 1 ot 3 cDoT Form #101 5/07
Region/SectiorVPatrol
f\--/
CDOT Perm 308135coLoRAgo DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
082 A 16.079 R
STATE HIGHWAY ACCESS PERMIT State Highway No/MP/Side
Local Jurisdiction
rfield Coun16-2 StraderJ0z
Date transmitlal
7100.00
P
Applicant:
Drexel Barrrell & Co
Jarnes Patton
ll3 N 7th Street, Suite 300
Crand Junction. CO 81501
970-157- 1 350
is hereby granled permission lo have an access to the staie highway at the tocation noled belorv. The access shall be constructed, mainiained and us8d in
accordance wilh ihis Dermit. including the state Higrlway Access code and any aiiachments, terms, conditions and exhibits. This permit may be revoked
by ihe issuing authorir), if Er 2ny time the permitted access and its use vioiate
"ny
pi,tt ot rhis pemlit. The issuing authority, (he oepartmenl and their duly
appoinred agents ancj emplsysgs shall ba held harmless ageinst any action for peisonaliniury or property cjamage sustained by reason of the exercise of
Ref No.
ihe
The Permittee(s);
TCI Lane Ranch
16ll I OId Flighu'ai'81
Carbondale, CO 8l6li
97A-963-j027
east of rnp 16tance ot 420on the south side of Hwy 82, aLocation
Access to Provide Service to: (Land usecotle:t
210 - Single-Fantiy Detacherl Housing (71 units)
130 - Residentiat Condominiunr/Torvnhousc ( lS units)
Total
(Sire or Ct'runt,
-10
l0
50
{ Uni!\)
DHV
DI{V
DHV
Additional lnf ormatiorr:
when the appropriate local authority retains issuing authorityRequired only
MUNICIPALITY OR COUNTY APPBOVAL
Prinlure
being used.
The permittee shall notifo D'Wayne Gaymon with the Colorado Department of Transportation in
Grand Junction, Colorado at (g70) 683-3355, at least 48 hours prior to commencing construction Y{ithin
the State Highway right-of-way.
The person signing as the permittee must be the owner or legat representalive oi rhe property served by ihe permifled access anci have full authority to
accept the permii and ils ierms and conditions,
attachments contained
red within 45 daYs from
ol the permit Prior to
aNS referencedndtertheanMSconditidoitmthmitteeereto5thenStnnofthisperagupoiggper
nisfi hndahallSbeaUSsafendmannbetndanAiltruconsshallctionhereincompleteexpeditio
tiondi 5nandrmscoancerdthewithteShalbeaccoinntThetiation.rmitted Sacces completedpe
j' - L; -cY
Namere
44
C+ -. /1^- g -<a tA "wte<<^ X___-A
This permit is not valid until signed by a duly authorized representative of the Department.
COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Date (of rTName
Make copies as necessary for:
Local Authorily lnsPector
MTCE Patrol Tratfic Engineer
are obsolete and maY not bo usedRequired:
'l.Flegion
2.Applicanl
3.Stafl Access Seclion
4.Central Files
Copy Dislribulion Previous
Page I ol 3 CDOT Form #101 5/07
r
)
Jim Brzostowicz
From
Sent:
To:
Roussin, Daniel [Daniel.Roussin@DOT'STATE'CO'US]
Wednesday, JulY 29, 2009 9:44 AM
Jim Bzostowicz
subject: RE:TCl Lane Ranch - sH82 and cR100 lntersection Memo
we agree with the study. However, I still need a permit from Garfield county to move fonruard
Thanks
Dan Roussin
Region 3 Traffic
From: Jim Baostowicz [mailto:JBzostowicz@drexelbarrell.com]
Sent: TuesdaY, JulY 28,2009 3:09 PM
To: Roussin, Daniel
subject: RE: TCI Lane Ranch - sHBz and CR100 Intersection Memo
Dan,
Its been about 2 weeks. . . 'anY news?
Jim Brzostowicz, P.E.
Ph: 303.442.4338 I Fax:303 442.4373
ibrzostowicz@d rexel barre ll. com
From : Roussin, Daniel [mai lto : Daniel. Roussin@DoT.STATE.CO.US]
Sent: TuesdaY, JulY 07,2009 4:02 PM
To: Jim Bzostowicz
subject: RE: TCI Lane Ranch - sHB2 and CR100 Intersection Memo
Jim - We will put it in the queue for review. We will need to talk to Garfield to formalize the
access agreement. I WII Sjef Uacf with you in the next 2 weeks' lf you don't hear from me'
please contact me.
Thanks
Dan Roussin
Region 3 Traffic
From: Jim Bzostowicz [mailto:JBrzostowicz@drexelbarrell.com]
Sent: TuesdaY, JulY 07, 2009 3:51 PM
To: Roussin, Daniel
subject: FW: TCI Lane Ranch - sH82 and CRl00Intersection Memo
Dan,
Following up from a long-ago email, I have attached a signed copy of the traffic memo and a revised site plan.
The site "plan shows the-raised median and the truck movements. Let me know if you need hard copies with
original seals of the traffic memo.
We'd like to get started on the design. Do we need to set up a pre-design meeting or similar for this
intersection?
I logo Drexel, Barrell & Co.
Engineers. Surveyors
Jim Brzostowicz, P.E., LEED AP
Department Head
Site and Infrastructure Development
Boulder. Colorado Springs . Denver
Grand Junction . Greeley. Steamboat Springs
wuryv. drexelbarrell. com
1800 38th Street, Boulder, Colorado 80301
Ph: 303.442.4338 I F ax: 303.442.437 3
ibzostowicz@drexelbarrell. com
From: Curtis Stevens
Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 3:25 PM
To: Jim Bzostowicz
Subject: FW: TCI Lane Ranch - SH82 and CR100 Intersection Memo
From : Roussin, Daniel fmai lto : Daniel. Roussin @ DOT.STATE. CO' US]
Sent: Tuesday, April 2L,2009 12:08 PM
To: Curtis Stevens
Cc: Scott Hall; Jon Fredericks; Ann T. Bowers; fredjarman@garfield-county.com
Subject: RE: TCI Lane Ranch - SHB2 and CR100 Intersection Memo
We have reviewed traffic memo and have the following comments:
1. The memo needs to be signed and Sealed by a professional engineer.
2. The median shall be a raised median rather than a painted median.
3. The radii and median shall be designed to accommodate truck turning movements.
Other than these comments, CDOT is ready to issue the permit. lf you have any questions, please let
me know.
Thanks
Dan Roussin
Region 3 Traffic
From : Cu rtis Stevens [ma i lto : CStevens@d rexel ba rrel l. com]
Sent: TuesdaY, APril 07,2009 L:24 PM
To: Roussin, Daniel
Cc: Scott Hall; Jon Fredericks; Ann T. Bowers
Subject: TCI Lane Ranch - SH82 and CR100 Intersection Memo
Dan,
Attached is a Technical Memo regarding proposed improvements at the intersection of SH 82 and CR 100 in
Garfield county. An exhibit as well as the HCM and Queue Reports are also included. Please review and let us
know if you have any comments or concerns.
Thank you,
Curtis
y logo Drexel, Barrell & Co.
Engineers . SurveYors
Curtis C. Stevens, P.E
Senior Project Manager
Boulder. Colorado Springs' Denver
Grand Junction . Greeley' Steamboat Springs
www. drexelbarrell. com
18OO 38th Street, Boulder, Colorado 80301
Ph: 303.M2.4338 I F ax: 303.442.437 3
cstevens@drexelbarrell.com
L