Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication- PermitrO 00 0 z (,r) 4 In 4 00 M tN 00 "14 t Se tt NC, CS N ' N rea ';g G ount of Permit $ IV � LIF \i' Permit No: Job Address: 0313 MWvkcce Lot No: n_p GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION 108 8'h Street, Suite 201, Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: 970-945-8212 / Fax: 970-384-3470 / Inspection Line: 970-384-5003 3 6 Use of Building: S►M 7 Describe It 8 Class of Work: 9 Garage: 0 ❑� Driveway Per f Block No: Parcel/Schedule No: CALF.. 1'-i hl 1 LY RES, i❑ x ❑ Single ❑ Double New Addition Subd. / Exemption: Ph: Ph: Z-6 ❑ Alteration ❑ Move Carport: Wk Ph: 3` eLt 3 ie. No. ic. N No. of Floors: ❑ Remove ❑ Single Valuation of Wort: $ 2 Special Conditions• K On -Site S (Septic) age Disposal ❑ Site Plan ❑ Double A SEPARATE ELECTRICAL PERMIT IS NOTIC REQUIRED AND MUST BE ISSUED BY THE STATE OF COLORADO. THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 180 DAYS, OR, IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 180 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK 15 COMMENCED. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLETED WITHIN WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL TILE PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULATING CONSTRUCTION OR THE PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTIO*� �i BLDG s F APPRO ote$b3 /1 A ATE TE L Adjusted Valuations: S? 0 .Z Plan Check Fee: Permit Fee: 641 39 9'gl� Total Fee: Dated Permit Issued: ke 28.l4 O C Group: tZ•3 Zoning: Const. Type: -14 Setbacks: Manu. Home: SDS No. & Fee: tektak_'a5-0c • PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO THE APPL CANT AS OWNER, CONTRACTOR AND/OR THE AGENT OF THE CONTRACTOR OR OWNER TO CONSTRUCT AGREEMENT THE STRUCTURE AS DETAILED ON PLANS AND SECIFICATIONS SUBMITTED TO AND REVIEWED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. IN CONSIDERATION OF THE ISSSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT, THE SIGNER. HEREBY AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL BUILDING CODES AND LAND USE REGULATIONS ADOPTED BY GARFIELD COUNTY PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GIVEN IN 30.28.201 CRS AS AMENDED. THE SIGNER FURTHER AGREES THAT IF THE ABOVE SAID ORDINANCES ARE NOT FULLY COMPILED WITH IN THE LCOATION, ERECTION, CONSTRUCTION, AND USE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED STRUCTURE, THE PERMIT MAY BE REVOKED BY NOTICE FROM THE COUNTY AND THAT THEN AND THERE IT SHALL BECOME NULL AND VOID. THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMT BASED UPON PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA SHALL NOT PREVENT THE BUILDING OFFICIAL FROM THEREAFTER REQUIRING THE CORRECTION OF ERRORS IN SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA OR FROM PREVENTING BUILDING OPERATION BEING CARRIED ON THEREUNDER WHEN IN VIOLATION OF THS CODE OR ANY OTHER ORDINANCE OR REGULATION OF THIS JURISDICTION. TANY HE REVIEW OF SUBMITTED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND INSPECTIONS CONDUCTED THEREAFTER DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ACCEPTANCE OF AND IMPLEMENTATION ATION DURING CONSTRUCTION RESTD S SPECIFIC ALLUNTY FOR Y WITH THE OMISSIONS RTIICTECT, DESIGNER, BUILDER, AND OWNER.FOR COMMENTS ARE INTENDED TO BE CONSERVATIVE AND IN SUPPORT OF THE OWNERS INTEREST. Garrom.003 1 1 HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE AGREEMENT ABOVE (INITIAL):� Applicant L (ijtf) PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST Date / Building Planning/Zo. ng /Engineered Foundation Property ine Setbacks l/Driveway Permit 30ft S ram Setbacks ✓^^ Su ed Site Plan 7SO ��, Floo. Plain a iA.Septic Permit and Setbacks Or -0-4 fat Bui'ding Height or,0Sd} --trrade/Topography 30% Za ' . g Sign -off 1/4---VAttach Residential Plan Review List Riad Impact Fees ----Minimum Application Questionnaire IOA/DRC Approval i1/14. Subdivision Plat Notes ade/Topography 40% `Q 'AFire Department Review c - Valuation Determination/Fees ' uidivision Plat Notes P ing Issues Red/Line Plans/Stamps/Sticker tt li Conditions ✓Applica ' II Signed Plan Reviewer To Sign Application Parcel/Schedule No. jt.Q 40# Snowload Letter- Manf. Bras. GENERAL NOTES: FEE ESTIMATE FINISHED LIVING SPACE: \\ 9 Ck X 69.00 .c3)7( UNFINISHED BASEMENT: X 41.00 = CRAWL SPACE: 9TC!:3: X 9.00 = GARAGE: X 18.00 = UNCOVERED PATIO/DECK:X 12.00 = COVERED PATIO/DECK: 3 X 24.00 = ignn MISC. MISC. TOTAL VALUATION: _I 5 O B PLAN REVIEW FEE: 4 7 % PERMIT FEE: 9652-7 TOTAL: I S93. 7 MANUFACTURED HOME SET UP FEE: SEPTIC -- PERMIT: PERK: GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING 970-945-8212 MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS for SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING CONSTRUCTION including NEW CONSTRUCTION ADDITIONS ALTERATIONS and MOVED BUILDINGS In order to understand the scope of the work intended under a permit application and expedite the issuance of a permit it is important that complete information be provided. Adequate and complete information will prevent delays in the plan review process. Reviewing a plan and the discovery that required information has not been provided by the applicant may result in the delay of the permit issuance and in proceeding with building construction. The owner or contractor may be required to provide this information before the plan review may proceed. This causes delays because other plans that are in line for review may be given attention before the new information may be reviewed after it has been provided to the Building Department. Please review this document to determine if you have enough information to design your project and provide adequate information to facilitate a plan review. If you do not, it may be helpful to obtain a book titled "Dwelling Construction under the Uniform Building Code". This book is available to you through this department at our cost. Also, please consider using a design professional for assistance in your design and a construction professional for construction of your project. To provide for a more understandable plan in order to dete mine compliance with the building, plumbing and mechanical codes, applicants are requested to review the following checklist prior to and during design. Applicants` are required to indicate appropriately and to submit the completed checklist at time of application for a permit. 1 Plans to be included for a Building Permit, must be on drafting paper at least 18"x24" and drawn to scale. Plans must include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations all sides with decks, balcony, steps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the finish grade line. A section showing in detail, from the bottom of the footing to the top of the roof, including re -bar, anchor bolts, pressure treated plates, floor joists, wall studs and spacing, insulation, sheeting, house - rap, (which is required), siding or any approved building material. A window schedule. A door schedule. A floor framing plan, a roof framing plan, roof must be designed to withstand a 40 pound per square foot up to 7,000 feet in elevation, an 80 M.P.H. windshear, wind exposure B, windload of 15 pounds per square foot, and a 36 inch frost depth. All sheets to be identified by number and indexed. All of the above requirements must be met or your plans will be returned. All plans submitted must be incompliance with the 1997 UBC, UMC and 1997 UPC. 1. Is a site plan included that identifies the location of the proposed structure or addition and distances to the property lines from each comer of the proposed structure(s) prepared by a licensed surveyor and has the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing? Properties with slopes of 30% or greater must be shown on the site plan. NOTE: 106.3.1 (7.) Any site plan for the placement of any portion of a structure within 50 ft. of a property line and not within a previously surveyed building envelope on a subdivision final plat shall be prepared by a licensed surveyor and have the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing. Any structure to be built within a building envelope of a lot shown on a recorded subdivision plat, shall include a copy of the building envelope as it is shown on the final plat with the proposed structure located within the envelope. Yes L/ 2. Does the site plan also include any other buildings on the property, setback easements and utility easements? Please refer to Section 5.05.03 in the Garfield County Zoning Resolution if the property you are applying for a building permit on is located on a comer lot. Special setbacks JI,ApPly. Yes 3. Does the site plan include when applicable the location of the I.S.D.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System) and the distances to the property lines, wells (on subject property and adjacent pro ies), streams or water courses? Yes 2 4. Does the site plan indicate the location and direction of the County or private road accessing the property?z Yes ✓ 5. Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all reinforcing steel in accordance with the uniform building code or per stamped engineered design? Yes Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl spaces and thy4learances required between wood and earth? Yes Do the plans indicate the size and location of ventilation openings for the attic, roof joist spaces's and soffits? Yes (j T\t&r 5T S 8. Do the plans include design loads as required by Garfield County for roof snow loads, (a minimum of 40 pounds per square foot up to & including 7,000 feet above sea level), floor loads and win -iads? Yes 9. Does the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor, and roof construction? j Yes 10. Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists, wall studs, ceiling joists, roof ra to or joists or trusses? Yes 11. Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method of positive connection of all columns an beams? Yes Does the plan indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the highest point of the building or addition measured at mid span between the ridge and the eave down to existing (undistur d) grade contours? Yes 13. Does the plan include any stove or zero clearance fireplace planned for installation including make and model and Colorado Phase -certifications or phase II EPA certification? Yes No 3 14. Does the plan include a masonry fireplace including a fireplace section indicating design to comply with the Uniform Building Co hapter 37? Yes No 5. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that egress/rescue windows from sleeping rooms and/or basements comply with the requirements of the Uniform Building Code? Yes No Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that windows provide natural light and venon for all habitable rooms? Yes 1/ No 17. Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass doors, glazing immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as a walking surface; sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub enclosures and specify s ty glazing for these areas? Yes No 18. Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces, boilers and water heaters indicated on e plan? Yes No 1 art size— none - in G /ffk U?,n-y 19. Do you understand that if you are building on a parcel of land created by the exemption process or the subdiv'sion process, are building plans in compliance with all plat notes and/or covenants? Yes / No 20. Do you understand that if you belong to a homeowners association, it is your responsibility to obtain written permission from the association, if required by that association, prior to submitting an application for a building permit? If you do not have written permission from the association, do you understand that the plan check fee will not be refunded should the architectural c mittee deny or reject your building plans? Yes No -at JS J2'D %L,.,4, 21. Will this b:tlfrottly residential structure on the parcel? Yes No If no -Explain: 22. Have two (2) c plete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the application? Yes 23. Do you understand that the minimum dimensions a home can be on a lot is 20ft.wide and 2011. long? Yes No 4 24. Have you design or had this plan designed while considering building and other construction co requirements? Yes No 25. Do your plans comply with all zoning rules and regulations in the County related to your properties zone di ct? Yes No 26. Does the plan accura -1y indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a final inspection by th• ' arfield County Building Department? Yes No 27. Do you understand t approval for design and/or construction changes are required prior to the application these changes? Yes No 28. Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a "Plan Review" fee from you at the time of application submittal and that you will be required to pay the "Permit Fee" as well as any "Road I • .act" or "Septic System" fees required, at the time you pick up your building permit? Yes No 29. Are you aware that twenty-four (24) hour notice is required for all inspections? Inspections will be made from Battlement Mesa to West Glenwood in the mornings and from Glenwood Springs to Carbondale in the afternoons. All inspections must be called in by 3:30 p.m. the day before. Failure to give twenty-four (24) hour notice for inspections will delay your inspection one (1) day. Inspections are to be called in to 384-5003. Yes './ No 30. Are you aware that re uesting inspections on work that is not ready or not accessible will result in a $47.0 e-inpsection fee? Yes No 31. Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the Uniform Building Code inclu ' g approval on a final inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy and cupancy of the building? Yes No 32. Are you aware that the Permit Application must be signed by the Owner or a written authority be given fo an Agent and that the party responsible for the project must comply with the Unifo uilding Code? Yes No 5 Are you aware that prior to submittal issuance of a building permit application you are required to show proof of a driveway access permit or obtain a statement from the Garfield County Road & Bridg Department stating one is not necessary? You can contact the Road & Bridge Dep nt at 625-8601. Yes No 34. Do you understand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed Electrician and Plumber to perform installations and hookups, unless you as the homeowner are performing the work? T e license number of the person performing the work will be required at ti e of a icable inspection. Yes No 35. Are you aware, that on the front of the Building Permit Application you will need to fill in the Parcel/Schedule ber for the lot you are applying for this permit on prior to submittal of a building pe r- application? Your attention in this is appreciated. Yes No I hereby acknowledge that I have read, understand and answered these questions to the best of my ability. Signature"/o �Swner fruit -t Phone: 1/3 0/ (days); Project Name: Project Address: (":37. 3 lied) //4Yz6 012 t /4€) C°t4Zc� / g/OF7 Notes: /071 fiI/rh» Date Mac- 826,- foac-8 G(„- 7.,ff,>7 (evenings) If you have answered "No" on any of the questions, you may be required to provide this information at the request of the Building Official prior to beginning the plan review process. Delays in issuing the permit are to be expected. Work may not proceed without the issuance of a permit. If it is determined by the Building Official that additional information is necessary to review the application and plans to determine minimum compliance with the adopted codes, the application may be placed behind more recent applications for building permits in the review process and not reviewed until required information has been provided and the application rotates again to first position for review, delay in issuance of the permit or delay in proceeding with construction. bpminreq 04/2003 6 r delivery address below: Eo o_ ti) a . = O 2 a) 0 E o >, O 0 0 -c +a <SQ0-24 6 r - c6 03 76 o 8 cLi- 0 -0 F. :F. as 0. ca ti) *• c.)a 0 v E c 2 0 CC L. 0 .Ci.) ar >rzi -c E E Ts g 0 < TD 0 .2 co ca .c 2 2 4- 1133 2 0 2 e a b. u cc <3 0 D TO 2 SI 2 ts: -s 0 t o w • 00 +44 LE Restricted Delivery? IT' ru r- -a Er LEI 11.1 D D 7008 3230 102595-02-M-1540 PS Form 3811, February 2004 cn c c % -J ƒ 0) 0 * Ili w o \20¥ m~= ;_% z 7\ S#E{/ g o. 2 2 $CD LL °s=® « 0. — * m \ \ g *>gEE / 0 G /tQ a�1 E /2 _ E.' a «� -� 0 m 7 c 2 n.�® - 2E =2 =_J _ a . e=# _ _-� e o ee==®©=3-c-. < 5 ®r-cn=r �. CO ii C t =_ •ono=;@ -\»m o # 0 Joo�coLEo>n so 0 m.e @=sem=z=oo \� § 0 z (continue on back) COUNTY OF CARI5ELD - BUILDING DEPARTMENT CORRECTION NOTICE 108 8th St., Suite 201 Glenwood Springs, Colorado Phone (970) 945-8212 Job located at O Permit No. s 1.-ef' et' I have this day inspected this structure and these remises and found the following corrections needed: to eJ ad-- 'C You are hereby notified that the ab correction must be inspected before covering. When correction(s) have been made, call for inspection at 970-384-5003. Date 0—a —I 20 ��.-Sia '. �i/�•+-� Building Inspector Phone (970) 945-8212 SOIL AND FOUNDATION INVESTIGATION PROPOSED RESIDENCE, 0323 MID VALLEY DRIVE (ROAD 335), GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO Prepared For: King Lloyd 0323 Mid Valley Drive Silt, CO 81652 Job No. 4 401 84 October 8, 1984 TABLE OF CONTENTS CONCLUSIONS 1 SCOPE OF STUDY 1 PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION 1 SITE CONDITIONS 2 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 2 FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATIONS 3 FLOOR SLABS 4 UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM 5 SURFACE DRAINAGE 6 LIMITATIONS 7 FIGURE 1 - LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY HOLES FIGURE 2 - LOGS OF EXPLORATORY HOLES FIGURE 3 - LEGEND & NOTES OF EXPLORATORY HOLES FIGURES 4&5 - SWELL -CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS TABLE I - SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS CONCLUSIONS The proposed log residence can be founded with spread footings placed on the upper natural soils designed for a maximum bearing pressure of 2,000 psf. Other design and construction considerations related to geotechnical aspects of the site are presented in the body of this report. SCOPE OF STUDY This report presents the results of a soil and foundation investigation for the proposed Lloyd Residence to be located at 0323 Mid Valley Drive, Garfield County, Colorado. The project site is shown on Figure 1. This report has been prepared to summarize the data obtained and to present our conclusions and recommendations based on the proposed construction and the subsurface conditions encountered. Design parameters and a discussion of geotechnical engineering considerations related to construction of the proposed residence are included. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION We understand the proposed residence will be a single family dwelling utilizing log construction. The structure is proposed to be 2 stories in height and have a full basement. Excavation depth is expected to be about 4 feet below existing ground surface. Foundation loadings for the purpose of this report are assumed to be relatively light, typical of this type structure. -2 - If the design varies significantly from the project description presented above, we should be notified to re-evaluate the recommendations presented in this report. SITE CONDITIONS The proposed building site is located in a fallow alfalfa field directly northwest of County Road 335. The slope grade is slight and generally down to the north at about 2% to 3%. Elevation differential across the building site is small, about 1 foot. At the time field work, the basement excavation had been made, which was feet deep. The soils exposed in the excavation consisted of of our about 4 silty clays. Along the southern boundary of the property is an irrigation ditch (dry at the time of our work) which is apparently used to irrigate the property. An erosional scarp which has been cut by the Colorado River is located several hundred feet north of the building site. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS The subsurface conditions at the site were evaluated by drilling 2 exploratory holes at the approximate locations shown on Figure 1. Graphic logs of the subsurface conditions encountered are shown on Figure 2. As indicated by the logs, the subsurface profile is relatively uniform and consists of about 14 to 15 feet of stiff silty clays overlying a sand, gravel and cobble deposit. The clays are blocky and moist within the upper part and generally become very moist with depth. Results of swell -consolidation tests presented on Figures 4 and 5, indicate the clays to possess relatively low volume change potential under existing moisture and density conditions when subjected to loading and wetting. A minor swell potential is indicated by the test results which could increase if the material is subjected to drying and/or densification. No free water was encountered at time of test hole drilling. FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATIONS Considering the subsurface conditions encountered in the test borings and the general type construction, we recommend the residence be founded with spread footings placed on the upper natural soils. The following design and construction criteria should be observed for a spread footing foundation system: 1) Footings placed on the upper natural soils may be designed for a maximum soil bearing pressure of 2,000 psf. Footings designed and constructed as presented herein and subjected to the assumed loading are expected to be relatively minor, about 1/2 to 1 inch. A sig- nificant potential for foundation movement exists if the subsoils were to become wetted. 2) Spread footings should have a minimum dimension of 14 inches for walls and 2 feet for columns. 3) Exterior footings or footings constructed in nonheated areas should be provided with adequate soil cover above their bearing elevation for frost protection. 4) Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span an unsupported length of at least 10 feet. Basement walls acting as retaining structures should also be designed to resist a lateral earth pressure corresponding to an equivalent fluid weight of 50 pcf. Backfill should be well compacted and have a final surface graded to slope away from the structure. Walls should also be designed for appropriate surcharge loading. S) Areas of loose or soft soils exposed in the foundation excavations should be removed and the foundation bearing level extended down to undisturbed natural soils. Because of the disturbance of near surface soils due to past plowing, we expect a minimum footing depth of 1 1/2 feet below existing ground surface to penetrate loose or disturbed soils. After the excavation is made, prolonged drying or wetting should not be allowed which can greatly increase the settlement/heave potential of the subsoils. 6) A representative of the soil engineer should observe the footing excavations prior to concrete placement. FLOOR SLABS The natural on-site soils, exclusive of topsoil, are suitable to support lightly loaded slab -on -grade construction. Some of the clays possess a low swell potential and there is a risk of some slab movement and cracking. To reduce the effects of some differential movement, floor slabs should be separated from bearing walls and columns with an expansion joint which allows unrestrained vertical movement. Floor slabs should be provided with control joints to reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking, and the slabs should be adequately reinforced. We suggest that control joints be provided on the order of 15 feet on center. A minimum 4 -inch gravel layer should be placed beneath floor slabs. This material should consist of aggregate with less than 5% passing the No. 200 sieve and more than 50% retained on the No. 4 sieve. Fill placed beneath floor slabs should be a nonexpansive material compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Prior to fill placement, the ground surface should be stripped of vegetation, topsoil, or existing fill and debris. The exposed surface should not be compacted dry of optimum moisture which can increase subgrade heave potential. The on-site clays may be expansive when compacted and preferably should not be used as fill below slabs. UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM Although free water was not encountered during our investigation, it has been our experience in areas such as this, that local perched ground water may develop during times of heavy precipitation or seasonal runoff. Therefore, the lower level of the building should be protected from wetting by installation of an underdrain system. The underdrain system should consist of a perforated pipe installed in a gravel filled trench placed along the building perimeter at least 12 inches below the lowest adjacent grade and sloped on a minimum 1% grade to a suitable gravity outlet or a sump where water can be removed by pumping. The gravel drain material should contain less than 5% passing the No. 200 sieve and more than 50% retained on the No. 4 sieve. The drain should also act to prevent the buildup of hydrostatic pressure behind basement walls. SURFACE DRAINAGE The following drainage precautions should be observed during construction and maintained at all times after the facility has been completed: 1) Excessive wetting or drying of the soils exposed in the foundation excavations and underslab areas should be avoided during construction. The exposed subgrade should not be overcompacted. 2) Miscellaneous exterior backfill should be moistened or dried to near optimum and compacted to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density. 3) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions. We recommend a minimum slope of 6 inches in the first 10 feet. 4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill. 5) Landscaping which requires excessive watering and lawn sprinkler heads should be located at least 10 feet from foundation walls. LIMITATIONS This report has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering practices in this area for use by the client for design purposes. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the exploratory holes drilled at the locations indicated on the exploratory hole plan. The nature and extent of variations between the exploratory holes may not become evident until excavation is performed. If during construction, existing fill, soil, rock or water conditions appear to be different from those described herein, this office should be advised at once so re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made. We recommend on-site observation of excavations and foundation bearing strata by a soil engineer. CHEN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. By Steven L. Pawlak, P.E. 5LP/dc Colorado River Property Boundary Hole 2 • Approximate Scale: 1" = 40' Benchmark: Q, Top of Existing Well Casing. Assumed El. = 100' ',Hole 1 Proposed Log Residence 5' Drainage & I Utility Easement (typical) rigation Ditch Proposed king Drive r 4 401 3L chen and associates, inc. LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY HOLES Fig. 100 — 95 90 85 80 75 Hole 1 El. = 99.7' Hole 2 El. = 98.6' Proposed Approxi- mate Lower Floor Level. 7-8/12 _ WC=18.6 D0=98.5 / -200=96 • LL=32 • PI=11 /-8/12 i i i o'o os- eo 14/5 Note: ,-8/12 SWC=18.7 DD=99.8 i / 8/12 ,- WC=26.5 DD=96.7, -200=99 / LL=42 • PI=20 o:• o: 6.80/12 nn0:' 425/3 Explanation of Symbols Presented on Figure 3 100 — 95 — 90 85 80 75 wpwpi Elevation - Feet 4 401 84 chen and associates, inc. LOGS OF EXPLORATORY HOLES Fig, 2 LEGEND: -7 Topsoil Clay (CL4', silty, medium plastic, slightly porous to calcareous zones, blocky upper 4'-, stiff, moist to highly moist with depth, brown. riao Sand, Gravel and Cobbles (GP);some boulders, subrounded to rounded, dense, ": slightly moist, light brown. h Undisturbed Drive Sample, 2 -inch I.D. California Liner Sample. Standard Penetration Test (SPT) ASTM D-1586 8/12 Drive Sample Blow Count, indicates that 8 blows of a 140 -pound hammer fal 30 inches were required to drive the California or SPT sampler 12 inches. NOTES: 1) Test holes were drilled on 9/25/84 with a 4 -inch diameter continuous flight power auger. g 2) Locations of test holes were measured approximately by pacing from features shown on the site plan provided. 3) Elevations of test holes were measured by instrument level and refer to the bench mark shown on Figure 1. 4) The test hole locations and elevations should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. 5) The lines between materials shown on the test hole logs represent the approximate boundaries between material types and the transitions may be gradual. 6) No free water was encountered at time of test hole drilling. 7) WC = Water Content (%) DD = Dry Density (pcf) -200 = Percent Passing No. 200 Sieve LL = Liquid Limit (7,) PI = Plasticity Index (%) 4 401 8 chen and associates, inc. LEGEND & NOTES OF EXPLORATORY HOLES Fig, 3 ea Compression 0 1 2 4 5 6 3 4 5 6 chen and associates, inc. 0.1 APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf Moisture Content = 18.6 percent Dry Unit Weight = 98 .5 pcf , Sample al: silty clay F om: Hole 1 at 5 feet Moisture Content = 18.7 percent Dry Unit Weight = 99.5 pcf Sample of: silty clay From: Hole 2 at 5 feet II. 11MISIMaraill II IIiiIIi■,I D p e.sur- si•n unit- co.iian l due -• wetti .nr 0.1 APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf 0 #4 401 84 1.0 APPLIED PRESSURE — ks SWEI..L -CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS 4 Moisture Content = 18.7 percent Dry Unit Weight = 99.5 pcf Sample of: silty clay From: Hole 2 at 5 feet eta wr ans: ress n unde due corsts.nt wettir_g. 0 #4 401 84 1.0 APPLIED PRESSURE — ks SWEI..L -CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS 4 CA -1 A-79 0 1 w N N f 2 O U 3 4 5 6 7 chen and associates, inc. 0.1 fl4 Ani A4 10 APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf 5 Moisture Content = 26.5 percent Dry Unit Weight = 96.7 pcf Sample of: silty clay From. Hole 2 at 10 feet C:\ Espansior pressure due urcer constant tn wetting. 0.1 fl4 Ani A4 10 APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf 5 c { 0 0 z 0 F 0 o r N 0 SAMPI F LOCATION O In DEPTH (FEET) 5 N o. In 18.7 NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT (%) 18.6 O v L0 CO NATURAL DRY DENSITY (PCF) 98.5 0 o°n r a a 0 O iny 0 z on 0 _o LO PERCENT PASSING N0. 200 SIEVE 96 -P- N LIQUID LIMIT (%) 32 ATTERBERG LIMITS N O PLASTICITY INDEX (°!o) 11 UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (PSF) SOIL OR BEDROCK TYPE silty clay N H. I rt 0 H m CO H. N rt O I -- w c { 0 0 z 0 F 0 o r C," e GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND SANITATION DEPARTMENT 2014 Blake Avenue Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Phone (303)945.8241 INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL PERMIT C 1389 Owner System Location Licensed Installer fl` At Cr, Z. W car .� n 7 7.9- . >/i,re1/1, © et /t/ e7Z This does not constitute a bujiding or use pgrmit. .,� / Conditional Construction approval is hereby granted for a 9..S C% gallon x Septic Tank or Aerated treatment unit. Absorption area (or dispersal area) computed as follows: Perc rate of one inch in a O minutes requires a minimum of etniSsq. ft. of absorption area per bedroom. Therefore the no. of bedrooms ;;? x /t.ft. minimum requirement = a total of sq. ft. of absorption area. May we suggest 0141'.71‘76/-`5 ,r"s:Y/a/J .:.Y'lr- (, .. 7 . C r`7`6YTGf�^'St' e"i�'- 4•:>..:r0 aS G'a, re -0 E%/ 2' / c C/ .� / 'sY r� ciec Date ( - / •Ci /t/' inspector FINAL APPROVAL OF SYSTEM: No system shall be deemed to be in compliance with the Sewage Disposal laws until the assembled system is approved prior to cover• ing any part. _at-- Septic Tank access for inspection and cleaning within 12" of ground surface or aerated access ports above ground a52 surface. �/r Proper materials and assembly. �%,/tC name of septic tank or aerated treatment unit. Adequate absorption (or dispersal) area. GCa Adequate compliance with permit requirements, tsr Adequate compliance with County and State regulations/requirements. D/Y'. J"-') e -e Prr_=9ra�''�7"7'c -" /9l'�i�"c.-5"'liC.) f� o%- / .�.,Gp+!--�d`-' Other F��%��-- e c at--%--rJ�rn „�Z�?7y%c; Y t...x/>lo • %'�i-a��c..-�� /� ') ' r Date C� 'c✓' �J Inspector e". —� RETAIN WITH RECEIPT RECORDS AT CONSTRUCTION SITE 'CONDITIONS: 1. All installation must comply with all requirements of the County Individual Sewage Disposal Regulations, adopted pursuant to au- thority granted in 66-44-4, CRS 1963, amended 66-3-14, CRS 1963. 2. This permit is valid only for connection to structures which have fully complied, with County zoning and building requirements. Connection to or use with any dwelling or structures not approved by the Building and Zoning office shall automatically be a viola- tion of a requirement of the permit and cause for both legal action and revocation of the permit. 3. Section III, 3.24 requires any person who constructs, alters, or installs an individual sewage disposal system in a manner which in- volves a knowing and material variation from the terms or specifications contained in the application of permit commits a Class 1, Petty Offense (5500.00 fine - 6 months in jail or both). Applicant: Groan Copy Department: Plnk Copy INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM APPLICATION OMER I<; vg J&tti AD6RESSVIP,M'4,7. AAsed) CliAstt , Lo, PHONE 7b-z?23 CONTRACTOR Ow4verk ADDRESS PHONE Application Approval by County Official: /SD eza PERMIT REQUEST FOR: New Installation ( ) Alteration ( ) Repair Attach separate sheets or report showing entire area with respect to surround ng areas, topography of area, habitable building, location of potable water wells, soil percolation test holes, soil profiles in test holes. (See page 4.) LOCATION OF PROPOSED FACILITY: County 6,147‘..,5/ Near what City of Town Silt' Lot Size cqq ML ! Legal Description_,,,{- 9-/7 PiA ,SizAzihrficlidiM2 WASTES TYPE: Dwelling ( ) Commercial or Institutional ( ) Other - Describe BUILDING OR SERVICE TYPE: ) Transient Use ) Non-domestic Wastes Number of bedrooms c2— Number of persons 3 ( ) Garbage grinder (?‹ Automatic washer ( Dishwasher SOURCE AND TYPE OF WATER SUPPLY: ( well ( ) spring ( ) stream or creek Give depth of all wells within 180 feet of system: '75 If supplied by community water, give name or supplier: GROUND CONDITIONS: Depth to bedrock: Depth to first Ground Water Table: hp {, Percent ground slope: a 20% DISTANCE TO NEAREST COMMUNITY SEWER SYSTEM: E m;/rtc; Was an effort made to connect to community system? %y/0 TYPE OF INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PROPOSED: ( Septic Tank ( ) Aeration Plant ( ) Vault ( ) Vault Privy ( ) Composting Toilet ( ) Recycling, potable use ( ) Pit Privy ( ) Incineration Toilet ( ) Recycling, other use ( ) Chemical Toilet ( ) Other - Describe: FINAL DISPOSAL BY: Absorption Trench, Bed or Pit ) Underground Dispersal ) Above Ground Dispersal ) Other - Describe: ( ) Evapotranspiration ( ) Sand Filter ( ) Wastewater Pond WILL EFFLUENT BE DISCHARGED DIRECTLY INTO WATERS OF THE STATE? No Page 2 SOIL PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS: (To be completed by Registered Professional Engineer.) ' Minutes zb per inch in hole No. 1 Minutes per inch in hole No. 3 4..-411nutes 7r5 per inch in hole No. 2 Minutes per inch in hole No. Nance, address and telephone of RPE who made soil absorption tests:gibe_ k'«Si/d4t/,S' :JQ- Name, address and telephone of RPE responsible for design of the system: Applicant acknowledges that the completeness of the application is conditional upon such further mandatory and additional tests and reports as may be required by the local health department to be made and furnished by the applicant or by the local health department for purposes of the evaluation of the application; and the issuance of the permit is subject to such terms and conditions as deemed necessary to insure compliance with rules and regulations adopted under Article 10, Title 25, C.R.S. 1973, as amended. The undersigned hereby certifies that all statements made, information and reports submitted herewith and required to be submitted by the applicant are or will be represented to be true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief and are designed to be relied on by the local department of health in evaluating the same for purposes of issuing the permit applied for herein. I further under- stand that any falsification or misrepresentation may result in the denial of the application or revocation of any permit granted based upon said application and in legal action for per- jury as provided by law. Date PLEASE DRAW AND ACCURATE MAP TO YOUR PROPERTY Signed 1atL Page 3 09/29/2003 23:37 6258627 ROAD AND BRIDGE PAGE 01 Garfield County Garfield County Road and Bridge Department September 30, 2003 Mr. ICing I1oyd 0323 Mid Valley Dtive New Castle„ CO 81637 CO Garfield County Building and Planning Department Dear Mr. Lloyd, The extension you wish to put on your home doesn't affect the driveway that you have in place which is in accordance with the Garfield County Road and Bridge Department's specifications for driveways and you do not need a permit for this driveway. Also, the driveway doesn't access a County toad If you have any questions or problems, please feel free to contact me. Mall ct Foreman Garfield County Road and Bridge Department T509 -)eq 0367 County Road 332 F.O. Dose 426 Rile, CO 61630 Phony 970-6234601 Foe 970-423467 Worksheet Reference Tables Table ArEgoivalent Thermal Performance of Assemblies R -values (hr-F-sf/Etn) AUCe@ngs/Roofs At& insulation R•vahn Combustion R30 R48 R49 R.60 27.9 35.9 48.9 57.9 Framed InstlationR•value Construction R•19 1422 R40 R48 2x6 at 16'oe 14.7 15.8 16.3 , 2x6 at 24'oc 15.3 16.5 17.1 2x8et16'oc 17.0 18.9 20.6, 21.1 2x86124'oc 17.6 19.6 21.6 22.2 2x10 at 16'oc 18.1 20.1 24.5 25.7 2x10at24'oc 18.4 20.1 25.5 26.8 2x12 at 16'oc 168 21.0 25.5 30.1 2x12at24'oc 19.0 21.4 27.3 31.4 A2rFramed Wall Shale We Insulation R•value Framing R-11 R•13 R-19 R•25 2x4 et 16 -cc 12.0 13.6 , 2.x4 at 24'oc 127 13.9 , , 2x6 at 16'oc 14.1 15.4 17.7 19.2 2x6 at 24'oc 14.3 15.6 182 19.8 Dadte Wan Total Thickness (inches) Riming 8 10 12 14 25.0 31.3 37.5 43.8 The Rookie of irsuletirg sheatng should be added to the values in this table. A3dnsulated Root Table A continued Table &Projected Area Adjustment Factors ASDoot Degrees off SderSystem Type True DG, TW, SSA SSB, Soldwood with 22 South WW, SSC SSD SSE Weetherstappirg 0 1.00 0.77 0.75 Metal wilhrigfd 5,9 5 1.00 0.76 0.75 barn core 10 0.98 0.75 0.74 15 0.97 0.74 0.73 20 0.94 0.72 0.70 Table &Perimeter Heat Loss 30 0.87 0.66 0.65 Factors for Slabs -on -Grade and Basements (Btu/h-F-tt) Heated Unheated ImSated Perimeter Slabs -on- Base. Base- Crawl - Insulation Grade marts mens spaces Table P53olar System Saving Fractions None 0.8 1.3 1.1 1.1 R3 0.4 0.8 0.7 0.6 R-7 0.3 0.7 0.6 0.5 FUDIroelGsin R•11 0.3 0.6 0.5 R•19 0.2 0.4 0.5 0.3 Load DGC1 -D4,c_ DGC3 R-30 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.2 Collector Dottie Lowe R6 Night Ratio Gazing Glazing Insulation 400 0.04 0.05 0.06 300 0.06 0.06 0.08 200 0.08 0.09 0.12 150 0.11 0.13 0,15 100 0.16 0.19 0.23 80 0.20 0.23 0.26 60 0.25 0.29 0.36 50 0.29 0.34 0.42 45 0.32 0.37 0.45 40 0.35 0.41 0.49 35 0.38 0.45 0.54 30 0.42 0.50 0.60 25 0.47 0.56 0.67 20 0.53 0.63 0.75 15 0.60 0.72 0.84 Table Cheating Degree Days (F -day) CI Mating Degree Days (Base 657) Aspen 8850 Carbondale 7320 Glenwood Sprigs S1LT 5800 59'71 Eagle C2 Heating Degree Day Multiplier Insulation MeltePassive Solar F2'Trombe Wall Fra mug R•11 R-19 R33 R38 Heat Loss Glazing Area per TWF3 1WA3 TWJ2 1W4 per per Square Foot 2x6Frw at 16'oe 182 23.8 29.9 r Soo.10t .00 .05 .15 .20 Load Urented Vented Unwanted Unnamed 2x6s at 24'oc 18.4 24.5 31.5 Collector Non- Non. Seiec- Night 2xBs at 16'oc 18.8 24.9 31.7 36.0 1200 1.07 1.07 1.08 1.08 1.08 Ratio selective selective tine Insulation Etas at 24'oc 18.9 25.4 33.1 37.9 11.50 1.07 1.07 1.07 1.08 1.08 400 Zx10 at 16'od 19.3 25.8 33.4 38,1 11.00 1.06 1.07 ,1.07- 1.07 1.08 0.03 0.05 0.03 0.00 2x10 at 24'oc 19.3 26.1 34.4 39.8 10.50 1.06 1.06 1.06 1,07 1,07 300 0.04 0.07 0.06 0.03 200 0.07 0.10 0.12 0.08 2x12at16'oc 19.7 26.5- 34.7 39.8 10.00 1.05 1,05 1.06 1.06 1.07 2x12 at 24'oc 19.6 267 35.5 41.2 9.50 1.04 1.05 1.05 1.06 1.06 150 0.10 0.13 0.17 0.12 100 0.15 0.18 0.26 0.20 9.00 1.04 1.04 1.05 1.05 1.06 These R•values bode the buffering effect of a 8.50 1.03 1.03 1.04 1.04 1.05 80 0.18 022 0.32 0.25 ventilated aawlspace or union:Maned basement 8.00 1.02 1.02 1.03 1.04 1.04 60 0.23 0.27 0.40 0.33 7.50 1.01 1.01 1.02 1.03 1.03 50 0.27 0.31 0.46 0.38 7.00 1.00 1.00 1.01 1.02 1.03 45 0.30 0.33 0.50 0.42 40 A4 -Windows 6.50 0.98 0.99 1.00 1.01 1.02 0.32 0.36 0.54 0.46 6.00 0.96 0.98 0.99 1.00 1.01 35 0.36 0.40 0.58 0.50 Air Gap 5.50 0.95 0.96 0.97 0.98 0.99 30 0.40 0.44 0.63 0.55 1/4 in. 12th. 12 in. argon 5.00 0.92 0.94 0.95 0.97 0.98 25 0.45 0.49 0.69 0.62 Standard Metal Frame 4.50 0.89 0.92 0.93 0.95 0.96 20 0.51 0.55 0.76 0.69 Single .9 4.00 0.86 0.89 0.91 0.93 0.94 15 0.60 0.64 0.64 0.76 Double 1.1 1.2 1.2 3.50 0.81 0.85 0.88 0.90 0.92 Low -e (e<=.40) 1.2 1.3 1.3 3.00 0.76 0.80 0.83 0.87 0.89 Metal hams thermal break 2.50 0.68 0.74 0.78 0.82 0.85 Double 1.5 1.6 1.7 2.00 0.58 0.66 0.72 0.77 0.81 Low -e (e<4.40) 1.6 1.8 1.8 Lowe (e<O.20) 1.7 1.9 2.0 Metal fame with thermal break Table &Base Case Conservation Double 2.0 , 2.1 2.2 Performance (Btu/yr-id) Lrnwe(ec,O.40) 2.1 2.4 2.5 Lav-e(ec4.20) 2.2 2.6 27 Base Case 47,436 Low -e (ex._:10) 2.3 2.6 2.9 These Ft -values are based on a 3 mph wind speed and are typical for the entire rough framed ooening. Manufadume's data, used on National Fenestration Rating Council procedures, should be used when available. One half the R•value of movable insulation should be added, when appropnate. 1 General Project Information Pat-ev-K ye IQes�c�ln Protect Name I-.41St t RtiStoettce fl MMA Location b3L3 M ib uI LL$'{ DR., N.C. Designer Kim 1.tp td Floor Area in St C4. Date Worksheet I: Conservation Performance Level A. Envelope Heat Loss Construction Description Ceilings/roofs R 30 t)aS\(Y11\, Area R -value Heat (Table Al Loss Walls sr 2.. + Z 7,9 - 31,3 + see AttmAteb S+d.w"t - V.c3 Insulated Floors tk-1q 'DGsvi&t\t' , + e �; a , Non -solar Glazing Doors eat + s t4l5t4i.-+ FO's Log -0 2.1 5.ci B. Foundation Perimeter Heat Loss t}317.- BtuPF-h Total Heat Loss Factor Heat Description Perimeter [Table B] Lass Slabs -on -Grade Heated Basements Unheated Basements Perimeter Insulated Crawlsoaces .-fl oes\i fit C. Infiltration Heat Loss x x tl-p 4 b Btu/Eh Total 2:13, i x M x .018 v l -h rt, 3 BtuPF-h Building Air Changes Volume per Hour D. Total Heat Loss per Square Foot 24 E. Conservation Performance Level tott. Total Heat Loss per Square Foot x 772.6 + g.a.. Total Heat Loss Floor Area (A+B+C) 1 U ,Z= Btu/DD-sf x x kb'? = 6.6169 Btuyr-,t Heating Degree Heating Degree P1Lktbes.su Days (Table C] Day Multiplier (Table C] F. Comparison Conservation Performance (From Previous Calculation or from Table 0) raR - Bw yr.sf Lit SreL Compare Line E to Line F Passive Solar Design Strategies General Project Information 6-6t,w+1 S" `lCacte rrofect Name LL.y dt Re5 t1 t--.lw a Mb atm) Floor Area '181. SQ ct• Location 0323 PIMwc.4S'j QR.. P6.4-, Date 4 Designer tea LAO ik Worksheet I: Conservation Performance Level A. Envelope Heat Loss Construction Description Area R-veiue Heat (Table Al Loss Ceilings/roots R- f.% besite% Walls R- t9 orgisvt Insulated Floors asInstr Non -solar Glazing Doors Mei.ad 4 6osn cart. B. Foundation Perimeter Heat Loss gzz. + 2.6.9 32.4- + - - 112.3 + - 0.�1 63.41- + - qr. 4- 1cli 3S1 + - 3V to - t547- + S.Z+ - 2.1 + 6.9 — 1a(o 1£Lf 3 Btw'F-h Total Heat Loss Factor Heat Description Perimeter [Table 01 Loss Slabs -on -Grade Heated Basements Unheated Basements Perimeter Insulated Crawlsoaces C. Infiltration Heat Loss x x — x = R.-1 Des esva Sts x O. S = +0 9-o Total M BtuPF•h 8253.8 x I x .018 - 11"9,9) BtuPF-h Building Air Changes Volume per Hour D. Total Heat Loss per Square Foot 24 x 434> + 981, _ 10..G Total Heat Loss Floor Area (A+B+C) E. Conservation Performance Level Btu/DD-st I d.5 x 5q `2 ! x t .o = 67j ogq. a !yr -at Total Heat Heating Degree Reefing Degree Loss per Days (Table C] Day Multiplier G.i' vSPtL^° Square Foot [Table CJ F. Comparison Conservation Performance(From Previa usCalculation arfrom Table 0) Btulyr•sf Compare Line E to Line F Passive Solar Design Strategies Worksheet Instructions General The Worksneets provide a calculation procedure to estimate the performance level of risslve solar building designs. It is recommended that the results be compared to Worksheet calculations (or the builder's typical house. Performance levels for the NABB base case used In the guidelines are also provided for comparison. A separate worksheet Is provided for the four separate performance levels and associated base cases. The worksheets are supported by a number of data tables. The tablesare given a letter designation and are referenced next to each worksheet entry. when applicable. The floor area used In the calculations should not Include sunspaces. garages or other unconditioned spaces. Worksheet 'Conservation Performance Level This is an estimate of the amount of heat energy needed by the building each year from both the solar system and the auxiliary heating system. For Step A, It is necessary to measure the net area of surfaces that enclose conditioned space. For walls. the net surface area Is the gross wall area less the window and door area. Rough frame dimensions are generally used to measure window area The R -values In Table A4 are for the rough frame window area. Heat lose from passive solar systems is rrrluded. The surface area of direct gain glazing, Trombe walla, water walls and the walls that separate sunspaces from the house are Ignored. Step A Includes consideration of insulated floors over crawlspaces, unheated basements or garages. R -values are provided in Table A3 that account for the buffering effect of these unconditioned spaces. When insulation Is not installed in the floor assembly, but rather around the perimeter of a crawlspace or unheated basement. Step B should be used. The perimeter method of Step B Is used for slabs -on -grade. the below -grade portion of heated basements. unheated basements (when the floor Is not insulated). and perimeter insulated crawispaces (when the floor is not insulated). Heated basement walls that are above grade should be considered in Step A. Slab edge perimeter, unheated basements or perimeter Insulated crawlspaces adjacent to sunspaces should not be Included. The conservation performance level is calculated as the product of the heat loss per degree day per square foot (Step DI and the heating degree days, adjusted for the heat loss and solar glazing per square foot. The adjustment is taken from Table C. based on data calculated on Worksheet £ Step D and Worksheet 11. Step A. PSIC's Worksheets for Horne Builders Should the estimated conservation performance level be greater than desired. the designer should consider additional building Insulation or reducing non -south glass area. Worksheet IDAnsiliary Heat Performance Level 'this is an estimate of the amount of heat that must be provided each year from the auxiliary heating system. It accounts for savings due to solar energy. In Step A ,the user may enter the rough frame area of solar glazing,, since It Is generally easter to measure the rough frame area than It is the net glazing area. The worksheet Includes a net area factor of 0.80 to account for window frames and mullions. If the designer enters the net glass area. then the net area factor Is 1.00. The projected area of the solar systems may be calculated using the adjustment factors In Table E or by making a scaled elevation drawing of the building facing exactly south and measuring the glazing area from the scaled drawing. The projected area per square foot Is calculated as the last part of Step A. This is used to determine the heating degree days adjustment used on Worksheet 1. Step E. The load collector ratio is calculated In Step B. This Is used to determine the solar savings fractions In Step C. The solar systems used in Step C should be Identical to those used In Step A. The first and last columns of Step A are simply carried down. The solar savings fraction as determined separately for each type of passive solar system by looking up values In Tables Fl through F4. The sunspace system types are shown beneath Table F4. If the auxiliary heat performance level calculated In Step D 1s larger than desired, the designer should consider Increasing the size of the solar systems or adding additional solar systems. I.e. thermal storage walls. Worksheet IILComfort Performance Level This is the temperature swing expected on a clear winter day with the auxiliary heating system not operating. This worksheet requires that two sub- areas be defined within the building: those areas that receive direct solar gains and those areas that are connected to rooms that receive direct solar gains. Rooms that are separated from direct gain spaces by more than one door should not be Included to either category. Thermal mass elements located In unconditloned spaces such as sunspaces are not included. An exposed slab 1s one finished with vinyl tile, ceramic tile or other highly conductive materials. Carpeted slabs should not be considered exposed. The exposed slab area should be further reduced by about S0 percent to account for throw rugs and furnishings. As a rule -of -thumb. exposed slab area should be considered to be 1n the sun only when it Is located directly behind south glazing. The maximum slab area that 1s assumed to be in the sun should not exceed 1.5 times the adjacent south glass area In Step F. the projected area of solar glazing calculated on Worksheet II 1s used to calculate the comfort performance level. The projected area of water walls and unvented Trombe walls Is excluded In this step. A high temperature swing indicates Inadequate thermal mass or too much direct gain solar glazing. If the comfort performance level is greater than desired (131F recormnended), additional thermal mass should be added to the building or direct gain glazing should be reduced. Worksheet !Mummer Cooling Performance Level This is an estimate of the annual cooling load of the bulldingthe heat that needs to be removed from the building by an air conditioner In order to maintain comfort during the summer. In Step A, only the envelope surfaces that are exposed to sunlight are to be included. For instance, floors over crawlspaces and walls or doors adjacent to garages are excluded. Steps B and C of the worksheet account for solar gains. They use the rough frame area since this Is easier to measure. The worksheets Include a net area factor of 0.80 to account for window frames and mullions. If the net window area is used, the net area factor is 1.00. Table M gives the shade factor for windows Wath overhangs based on a projection factor. The proJectlon factor is the ratio between the horizontal projection of the overhang from the surface of window and the distance from the bottom of the window to the bottom of the overhang. When windows have sunscreens. tints or films, the shade factors in Table M should not be used. Instead. a shading coeflclent should be determined from manufacturers' literature. If the cooling performance level is greater than desired, the designer should consider reducing non -south glass. providing additional shading or increasing thermal mass. 11,6 thaApc.3.4.e.ok. eanct-31 Tarc-nryAvvw-6 Wearri-sitees ft1S 46 SG-ruG, lsrs casivrtitsalA \;seistoteinRfae: 6r44A, 54rwAttliwa514.trAct's' Ae. cverreNk 64C-ntt otetk Covt.5tatva„,4rionS Vtiv- vvtAckeestyA., \k4v� 115 4t# Ot$14.6. kre-ik VAelk-stowler*S Corr 6144, \i\leAX-S1A, MA:Aerak IbtreilvV60-t— vorlvel, un. Yvvitar--)A. clewveowS#1,144"Ccfr i-L144-41 Aat SVAiriftr 046v1,WCIe) i-VA-Vov±en,-1-- +Le- 5-1-V-vc-i-ti ire-) -1.4- o'F.5454-S 5514a1 IOLOGir VIAAA)26 04. 'Irks. Its tobrils 5tAek reso\A— -1,6,5"- e-otmAplAirit 4,5444014-Stakog u44; Lovvoki OiontA 6+0\414ag +Lk+ 41,6 ticktiv=C5 LA.mva 619)0841- VAA-;6- iinAt ctestyA. Wau1tA r 625) I 6.wtrout 61kt,b s ii3i-vitrek &c-to cs brsa- dotem et- tp)A,Siti.tr-tAoas1 5....uvAvo Wevut. Less Witt16 Sen)-0A. tgli- 1.102, 5As-k• Vt2.- ,47- tie,/ C or•FL. 4)k- • wk frikwa_\441/44 SC_ za Uzi 3114 z,5 44as‘qt"-2- tootionl WA-1,1 cIPL,‘ V-3 ra. 7,- 1612..5S- g.- 2-e 31-13 51/4aviaiikbitieuk vs‘,6 sk- R-3(7 zo „tp oie 5 vt).6 .9C. P. -3b. z0,10 (QV e May 21,2009 Garfield County Building and Planning Department 109 8`h St. Suite 303 Glenwood Springs, Co. 81601 Re: Building Permit No.8983 Dear Mr. Mead RECEIVED King Lloyd 0323 Mid Valley New Castle, Co. 81647 MAY 2 6 2009 GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING & PLANNING The permit that I have through the County was for an addition to my existing home. I'm adding a living room, bath room, and bedroom to my home. The work has been inspected as required by your department at the required stages of construction and it has all been found to be compliant with the codes. My inspection card indicates that I have one last inspection that is required for the final. The reason that so much time has lapsed leading up to the last inspection is that I had an accident while working on the addition. It is a sweat equity project being done by myself and the accident was a serious set back physically and financially. While I was injured I do recall calling and asking about any problems I might have with keeping the permit active. The replay that I got at that time was they don't expire. Fortunately at the time of the accident it was mostly interior work that I had left. My wife was able to plaster and paint, but the finishing of the floors, trim and misc, carpentry were things I had to do. I have recovered and have been whittling away on the finish work as money allows and intend to call for a final inspection very soon. All that remains is some interior trim, some soffit on the eave, an exterior stair rail. I do have my inspection card and through the help of family and friends work has been continuous, and nothing has changed from the approved plans. I apologize for this taking so long and never intended for it to come to this but things have happened that were beyond my control. If necessary I could come in and meet with you or I can be contacted at my work 8:00 am to 5:00 pin m -f, 384-6439. Thanks for your cooperation. King Lloyd