The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutApplication- PermitGARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING, SANITATION and PLANNING DEPARTMENT 109 8th. Street, Suite 303 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601(970) 9454212 Job Addreso DQ 3R P LSIOQ I No. 8679 4,-)1111.4,___ QfLEitk )2.__ Clerk GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION GARFIELD COUNTY (CGLENWOOD SPRINGS), COLORADO TELEPHONE: (970) 945-8212 PERMIT NO. 19 INSPECTION LINE: (970)394-500 PARCEL/SCHEDULE NO. 013913 -a9/- o/- 108 ADDRESS:(y�3 /; biersbeNa Carbonrta t anO ax3 1 LOT NO. // BLOCK NO. 4 SUBDIVISION/ION (7S106w / 6A„ v 2 Ena —IOC Eph wPoc ety — 074/1-4,4*(00 alia7 5S0 wna 3 `"'A""$imrl meq/ "Ps ay,4'actaCIO- 134-62399- no hit 4 "ciscrynni * AS5oc —VA 163 3 (%w42{/&r Mt wt7a5- " & F �. a .,�-La(�,1/4.,a,1L +/ . =�. ft S� 7 p m"`"0eG IOW ft'ArnC aekle fi» 8 AA= )cF, CADMIUM CIALTIWATICer CUM MUM 9 a..1ts gEMd?"1.G.FKP. Mad aD00Y8 10 EE• ZWAYPOWR MNMESWAM=POW.Ur) ye CCM PLAN vMmwaaarEcsc. All0 . a10.am I -:. .0 6 3 a.. cO 0, amoev+enninri .... a. - �.J (/ u�. -, ., •_. F��a) i 1a tg if .,,o A SEPARATE °'°""°° COLORADO. TUE PERMIT AITMORIZED WORK DI AI WORK 1 HEREBY KNOW in OD ! The following items are required by Garfield County for a final inspection: 1. A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector; 2. Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department posted where readily visible from access road; 3. A finished roof, a lockable house, complete exterior siding, exterior doors and windows installed, a complete kitchen with cabinets, a sink with hot & cold running water, non-absorbent kitchen floor coverings, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove and refrigerator, all necessary plumbing; 4. A complete bathroom, with washbowl, tub or shower, toilet stool, hot and cold running water, non-absorbent floors and walls finished and a privacy door; 5. All steps outside or inside over three (3) steps must have handrails, guard rails on balconies or decks over 30" high constructed to all 1997 UBC requirements; 6. Outside grading done to where water will detour away from the building; 7. Exceptions to the outside steps, decks and grading may be made upon the demonstration of extenuating circumstances, i.e. weather, but a Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until all the required items are completed and a final inspection made. A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. ****CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (C.O.) IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATING PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET. I und Certific d and ancy fo ide by the above conditions for bccupan use and the issuance of a e dwelling under building permit # Wt� Q` Signature Date Bpcont082002 • VALUATION/FEE DETERMINATION Applicant Subdivision Q(tv.. Address for �� 0S4t Ctia Lot/Block /-0+- 4Slock Contractor SM PAKJACIL. Date Finished (Livable Area): Main Wile i le Upper /ilk_ Lower 3042. • 49 209, 89$ Other Total Square Feet Valuation Basement: Y 1 7 Unfinished / S20 Conversion of Unfinished to Finished Plan Check Fee for Conversion Valuation Garage: Crawl Space: Valuation 1081 r / Valuation Decks/Patios: Covered Valuation IO v 2 4 OPen Valuation 2 8s 313 y it Total Valuation 2W o Lo 32 Building Permit Fee 2043.35 Plan Review Fee 13418 Total BP & PR 31404.C3 42 320 2 25$ 2400 3 7s'(, Plans to be included for a Building Permit, must be on drafting paper at least 18"x24" and drawn to scale. Plans must include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations all sides with decks, balcony, steps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the finish grade line. A section showing in detail, from the bottom of the footing to the top of the roof, including re -bar, anchor bolts, pressure treated plates, floor joists, wall studs and spacing, insulation, sheeting, house - rap, (which is required), siding or any approved building material. A window schedule. A door schedule. A floor framing plan, a roof framing plan, roof must be designed to withstand a 40 pound per square foot up to 7,000 feet in elevation, an 80 M.P.H. windshear, wind exposure B, windload of 15 pounds per square foot, and a 36 inch frost depth. All sheets to be identified by number and indexed. All of the above requirements must be met or your plans will be returned. All plans submitted must be incompliance with the 1997 UBC, UMC and 1997 UPC. 1. Is a site plan included that identifies the location of the proposed structure or addition and distances to the property lines from each corner of the proposed structure(s) prepared by a licensed surveyor and has the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing? Properties with slopes of 30% or greater must be shown on the site plan. Yes 2. Does the site plan also include any other buildings on the property, setback easements and utility easements? Yes V 3. Does the site plan include when applicable the location of the I.S.D.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System) and the distances to the property lines, wells (on subject property and adjacent Qperties), streams or water courses? Yes 4. Does the site plan indicate the location and direction of the County or private road accessing the prope Yes 5. Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all reinforcing steel in accordance with the uniform building code or per stamped engineered design?- Yes {/ 2 { • 6. Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl spaces and the clearances required between wood and earth? Yes ✓ 7. Do the plans indicate the size and location of ventilation openings for the attic, roof joist spaces's and: fits? Yes 8. Do the plans include design loads as required by Garfield County for roof snow loads, (a minimum of 40 pounds per square foot up to & including 7,000 feet above sea level), floor loads and wind ads? Yes 9. Does the plan include abuilding section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor, and roof construction? Yes 10. Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists, wall studs, ceiling joists, roof rafters or joists or trusses? Yes ✓ 11. Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method of positive connection of all columns qnd beams? Yes 12. Does the plan indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the highest point of the building or addition measured at mid span between the ridge and the eave down to existing (undis bed) grade contours? Yes 13. Does the plan include any stover zero clearance fireplace planned for installation including make and model and Coloradpfriase II certifications or phase II EPA certification? Yes No 14. Does the plan include a masonry firepl including a fireplace section indicating design to comply with the Uniform Buildin ode Chapter 37? Yes No 15. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that egress/rescue windows from sleeping roops and/or basements comply with the requirements of the Uniform Building Code? Yes No 3 16. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that windows provide natural light and ven[til 'on for all habitable rooms? Yes (/ No 17. Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass doors, glazing immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as a walking surface; sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub enclosures and specify safetyglazing for these areas? Yes 6 No 18. Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas fumaces, boilers and water heaters indicated onIan? Yes !/ No 19. Do you understand that if you are building on a parcel of land created by the exemption process or the subdivision process, are building plans in compliance with all plat notes and/or covenants?/ Yes 1" No 20. Do you understand that if you belong to a homeowners association, it is your responsibility to obtain written permission from the association, if required by that association, prior to submitting an application for a building permit? If you do not have written permission from the association, do you understand that the plan check fee will not be refunded should the architectural ittee deny or reject your building plans? Yes No 21. Will this be the gnty residential structure on the parcel? Yes �/ No If no -Explain: 22. Have two2( ) seemplete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the application? Yes (j 23. Do you understand that the minimum size a home can be on a lot is a 20ft. x 2011.? Yes V No 24. Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other construction codnrequirements? Yes !� No 25. Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a final inspection by th arfield County Building Department? Yes No 4 tr • 26. Do you understand that approval for design and/or construction changes are required prior to the applicafory6f�these changes? Yes !!// No 27. Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a "Plan Review" fee from you at the time of application submittal and that you will be required to pay the "Permit Fee" as well as any "Road Impact" or "Septic System" fees required, at the time you pick up your building p Yes !/ No 28. Are you aware that twenty-four (24) hour notice is required for all inspections? Inspections will be made from Battlement Mesa to West Glenwood in the mornings and from Glenwood Springs to Carbondale in the afternoons. All inspections must be called in by 3:30 p.m. the day before. Failure to give twenty-four (24) hour notice for inspections will, delay your inspection one (1) day. Inspections are to be called in to 384-5003.V Yes No 29. Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the Uniform Building Code including approval on a final inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy aryl iipancy of the building? Yes No 30. Are you aware that the person signing the Permit Application, whether the "Owner", "Agent of the Owner", "General Contractor", "Contractor" or otherwise, is the party responsible for the project com ging with the Uniform Building Code? Yes V No 31. Are you aware that prior to issuance of a building permit you are required to show proof of a driveway access permit or obtain a statement from the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department stating one is not necessary? You can contact the Road & Bridge Department at 625-8601. / Yes No 32. Do you understand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed Electrician and Plumber to perform installations and hookups, unless you as the homeowner are performing the work? The license number of the person performing the work will be required at time pplicable inspection. Yes No 5 33. Are you aware, that on the front of the Building Permit Application you will need to fill in the Parcel/Schedule Number for the lot you are applying for this permit on prior to issuance of a building pemjit? Your attention in this is appreciated. Yes - /// No I her bes edge that I have read, understand and answered these questions to the Signa e Phone: 'DO �i 4, f a- (days); Project Name: Project Address: Notes: "Tail 40-o3 Date cififitr (evenings) Ri tiers �krcQ If you have answered "No" on any of the questions, you may be required to provide this information at the request of the Building Official prior to beginning the plan review process. Delays in issuing the permit are to be expected. Work may not proceed without the issuance of a permit. If it is determined by the Building Official that additional information is necessary to review the application and plans to determine minimum compliance with the adopted codes, the application may be placed behind more recent applications for building permits in the review process and not reviewed until required information has been provided and the application rotates again to first position for review, delay in issuance of the permit or delay in proceeding with construction. bpminreq 08/2002 6 PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST Applicant �c uray Date 3-0-D3 Building Eng ne�ered Foundation 0,4 Driveway Permit L./Surveyed Site Plan M A Septic Permit and Setbacks Grade/Topography 30% ✓Attach Residential Plan Review List ✓Minimum Application Questionnaire Subdivision Plat Notes ✓Fire Department Review - 4wL.Lfrw "Valuation Determination/Fees Red Line Plans/Stamps/Sticker Attach Conditions - 0 nl PLM•li pplication Signed wer To Sign Application > Parcel/Schedule No. *2. 4. 40# Snowload Letter- Manf. Hms. GENERAL NOTES: Planning/Zoning Property Line Setbacks 30ft Stream Setbacks Flood Plain Building Height Zoning Sign -off oad Impact Fees HOA/DRC Approv Grade/Topography 40% Planning Issues Subdivision Plat Notes Ri_c 3.20 3.17 OIIJ ?COW Pr+*8lu�ty C � �' CaMbr olds - (Lenta 614. Qcw-,tp ASPM Gw GOLP COMPANY March 18, 2003 Re: Aspen Glen Lot A-11 Mr. and Mn. Joseph Dodrery 405 Route 17 South P.O. Box 990 Paramus, NJ 07652 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Dockery, . c'o John Smith submitted sddidonal plans and Jennifer submitted additional landscape plans which largely addressed the committee's concerns with the design and landscape noted at preliminary inview. Mr. Smith met earlier this day with me in regard to the construction management plan and builder's/owner's reeponsrbilities in the building process. The following were requirements of the DRC, and your submission of plans end landscape is approved conditional upon them: The landscape proposed along the driveway must be varied by the addition of shrubs, spruce and aspen plantings to shield the garages from view of the street, and to eliminate the linearity of the line of mngo pines shown on the revised landscape plea The mugo pines would benefit from grouping than together instead of spreading than out in a line as shown in the drawings. Mr. Smith will be aware of the details of this discussion as well. The details of the boulder landscape area at the rear of the lot were too sketchy for approval, and the committee request you bring back a detailed drawing (site plan and elevation) when the number and sire of rocks to be used and additional landscape (if any) armmd this feature can be better shown. The low berm proposed for the soudt and southeast portion of the lot must not exceed 2 feet in height or 8 feet in breadth. The decorative truss at the entry should be sotBted from below to prevent nesting of birds and for a more pleasing visual effect as you pass below it. These were the scan of the comments and requirements of the committee at this time. Mr. Smith inquired as to rite teed for a sprinkler systan for the home, m1 this will ultimately be determined by the Garfield County Building department. Mr. Smith was encouraged to, and stated he would, contact the county in this regwd. MIDI Osw Oen( Cmnn. 9929 tram Nam 52 • Gamma Ca,nnao 11623.976A63-4536. 1-500-2774536 MPS air 04Compap to a debate teCkb Co7oza►an *America and de Wedsce Camyen9 i rn. la. CW,7 . itrt Y WSN &ULr LU 1'10.214 P. 3/3 For your additional consideration, tbre:e (inspection need to occur during construction of your home. These will ultimately be your responsibility and bear upon. release of the Builder's Completion Deposit. Please contact the DRC Administrator at (910) 963-4536 extension 234, upon completion of the fnuodation end shy -in phases of construction end for your final on-site review by the DRC. Details of these ixucedures are contained in the Design Review application packet. Failure to call for any of these inspection will result In $1000 per viand= held by the Homeowners Anodation from the return of your Builder's Completion Depoedt. All inspections are performed by the Committee the 1st and 3zd Wednesday of each month. It will be necessary for your builder to arrange reviews In accordance with the DRC's scheduled sessions. . Plata keep in mind that a copy of your approved plans are kept on file for periodic review by the DeMgn Review Committee to assure compliance with your approved plans. Any anticipated changes from your approved plans must be submitted to, reviewed by and receive approval from the Design Review Committee prior to making any changes. Please contact me should you have any questions. Sincerely, Aspen Olen Design Review Board Keith Hdquist, cc: DRC files John Smith, Smith Managanent (via facsimile) Jennifer Tuggle (via facsimile) H Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. 5020 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Phone: 970-945-7988 Fax: 970-945-8454 hpgeo@hpgeotech.com SUBSOIL STUDY FOR FOUNDATION DESIGN PROPOSED RESIDENCE LOT A-11, ASPEN GLEN RIVER'S BEND GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO JOB NO. 102 742 DECEMBER 2, 2002 PREPARED FOR: SMITH MANAGEMENT, INC. ATTN: JON SMITH 0345 COUNTY ROAD 262 SILT, COLORADO 81652 HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. December 2, 2002 Smith Management, Inc. Attn: Jon Smith 0345 County Road 262 Silt, Colorado 81652 Job No. 102 742 Subject: Report Transmittal, Subsoil Study for Foundation Design, Proposed Residence, Lot A-11, Aspen Glen, River's Bend, Garfield County, Colorado. Dear Mr. Smith: As requested, we have conducted a subsoil study for the proposed residence at the subject site. Subsurface conditions encountered in the exploratory borings drilled in the proposed building area consist of about 'A to 1 foot of topsoil and 1 to 5 feet of stiff slightly sandy silty clay overlying relatively dense, silty sandy gravel containing cobbles and boulders. Groundwater was not encountered in the borings to the drilled depths of 5 to 8 feet. The proposed residence can be founded on spread footings placed on the natural granular subsoils and designed for an allowable bearing pressure of 3,000 psf. The report which follows describes our exploration, summarizes our findings, and presents our recommendations. It is important that we provide consultation during design, and field services during construction to review and monitor the implementation of the geotechnical recommendations. If you have any questions regarding this report, please contact us. Sincerely, HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. Jordy Z A • < .• so : DEH JZAJksw TABLE OF CONTENTS PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY 1 PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION 1 SITE CONDITIONS 2 SUBSIDENCE POTENTIAL 2 FIELD EXPLORATION 3 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 3 DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS 4 FOUNDATIONS 4 FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS 5 FLOOR SLABS 6 UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM 7 SURFACE DRAINAGE 8 LIMITATIONS 8 REFERENCES 9 FIGURE 1 - LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIGURE 2 - LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIGURE 3 - LEGEND AND NOTES FIGURE 4 - SWELL -CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS FIGURE 5 - GRADATION TEST RESULTS TABLE I - SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY This report presents the results of a subsoil study for a proposed residence to be located on Lot A-11, Aspen Glen, River's Bend, Garfield County, Colorado. The project site is shown on Fig. 1. The purpose of the study was to develop recommendations for the foundation design. The study was conducted in accordance with our agreement for geotechnical engineering services to Smith Management, Inc. dated November 13, 2002. Chen -Northern, Inc., previously conducted a preliminary geotechnical engineering study for the development (Chen -Northern, 1991) and another geotechnical engineering study for preliminary plat design (Chen -Northern, 1993). A field exploration program consisting of exploratory borings was conducted to obtain information on subsurface conditions. Samples of the subsoils obtained during the field exploration were tested in the laboratory to determine their classification, compressibility or swell and other engineering characteristics. The results of the field exploration and laboratory testing were analyzed to develop recommendations for foundation types, depths and allowable pressures for the proposed building foundation. This report summarizes the data obtained during this study and presents our conclusions, design recommendations and other geotechnical engineering considerations based on the proposed construction and the subsoil conditions encountered. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION The proposed residence will be a two story wood frame structure over a basement level. The attached garage and basement floors will be slab -on -grade. Grading for the structure is assumed to be relatively minor with cut depths up to about 10 feet We assume relatively light foundation Loadings, typical of the proposed type of construction. -2- 1f building loadings, location or grading plans change significantly from those described above, we should be notified to re-evaluate the recommendations contained in this report. SITE CONDITIONS The site was vacant at the time of our field exploration. The ground surface in the building area is relatively flat with a gentle slope down to the southeast. There is about 2 feet of elevation difference across the building envelope. A steep slope down to the southwest is located to the southwest of the building envelope. There appear to have been minor cuts and fills made on the site during overlot grading as part of the subdivision development. Vegetation in the building area consists of grass and weeds. Cottonwood trees and brush are located on the steep slope to the southwest of the building envelope. Scattered cobbles are exposed on the ground surface. SUBSIDENCE POTENTIAL Bedrock of the Pennsylvanian age Eagle Valley Evaporite underlies the Aspen Glen Development. These rocks are a sequence of gypsiferous shale, fine-grained sandstone/siltstone and limestone with some massive beds of gypsum. There is a possibility that massive gypsum deposits associated with the Eagle Valley Evaporite underlie portions of the lot. Dissolution of the gypsum under certain conditions can cause sinkholes to develop and can produce areas of localized subsidence. During previous work in the area, several broad subsidence areas and smaller size sinkhole areas were observed scattered throughout the Aspen Glen Development (Chen - Northern, Inc., 1991). These sinkholes appear similar to others associated with the Eagle Valley Evaporite in areas of the Roaring Fork Valley. Sinkholes were not observed in the immediate area of the subject lot and the lot is outside of the broad subsidence areas. No evidence of cavities was encountered in • �..a a a.t ' 1 ? +R -... ;y., ji :.,. k§ s✓�':`_eM�j.0 i» `„3 :: M.e +s - ” - . the' subsurface materials; however, the exploratory borings were relatively shallow, for -3 - foundation design only. Based on our present knowledge of the subsurface conditions at the site, it cannot be said for certain that sinkholes will not develop. The risk of future ground subsidence on Lot A-11 throughout the service life of the proposed residence, in our opinion, is low; however, the owner should be made aware of the potential for sinkhole development. If further investigation of possible cavities in the bedrock below the site is desired, we should be contacted. FIELD EXPLORATION The field exploration for the project was conducted on November 20, 2002. Two exploratory borings were drilled at the locations shown on Fig. 1 to evaluate the subsurface conditions. The borings were advanced with 4 inch diameter continuous flight augers powered by a truck -mounted Longyear CME -45B drill rig. The borings were logged by a representative of Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. Samples of the subsoils were taken with 1% inch and 2 inch I.D. spoon samplers. The samplers were driven into the subsoils at various depths with blows from a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches. This test is similar to the standard penetration test described by ASTM Method D-1586. The penetration resistance values are an indication of the relative density or consistency of the subsoils. Depths at which the samples were taken and the penetration resistance values are shown on the Logs of Exploratory Borings, Fig. 2. The samples were returned to our laboratory for review by the project engineer and testing. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Graphic logs of the subsurface conditions encountered at the site are shown on Fig. 2. The subsoils consist of about Vi to 1 foot of topsoil and 1 to 5 feet of stiff slightly sandy silty clay overlying relatively dense, silty sandy gravel containing cobbles and boulders. Drilling in the dense gravel with auger equipment was difficult due to the _ r aim._ . •rqi: T, z..A7j`,x T' "I'a: i��i�'.r."� = `�•'.�.-a. t �"' i'^f. S� f r�:y.'..a = u.+1.'R- � ,. cobbles and boulders and drllmg refusal was encountered in -the deposit. ��rrJYjt ifi ifr 4^!---3 H -P GEOTECH -4 - Laboratory testing performed on samples obtained from the borings included natural moisture content, density and gradation analyses. Results of swell - consolidation testing performed on a relatively undisturbed drive sample of the clay, presented on Fig. 4, indicate low compressibility under existing moisture conditions and light loading and a moderate expansion potential when wetted under a constant light surcharge. Results of a gradation analysis performed on a small diameter drive sample (minus 1' inch fraction) of the natural coarse granular soils are shown on Fig. 5. The laboratory testing is summarized in Table I. No free water was encountered in the borings at the time of drilling or when checked 12 days later. The subsoils were slightly moist. DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS FOUNDATIONS Considering the subsoil conditions encountered in the exploratory borings and the nature of the proposed construction, we recommend the building be founded with spread footings bearing on the natural granular soils. The topsoil and clay soils should be removed from the building area. The design and construction criteria presented below should be observed for a spread footing foundation system. 1) Footings placed on the undisturbed natural granular soils should be designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of 3,000 psf. Based on experience, we expect settlement of footings designed and constructed as discussed in this section will be about 1 inch or less. 2) The footings should have a minimum width of 16 inches for continuous walls and 2 feet for isolated pads. 3) Exterior footings and footings beneath unheated areas should be provided with adequate soil cover above their bearing elevation for frost -5 - protection. Placement of foundations at least 36 inches below exterior grade is typically used in this area. 4) Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span local anomalies such as by assuming an unsupported length of at least 10 feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining structures should also be designed to resist lateral earth pressures as discussed in the "Foundation and Retaining Walls" section of this report. 5) The topsoil, clays and any loose or disturbed soils should be removed and the footing bearing level extended down to relatively dense natural granular soils. As an alternative, design bearing levels can be re- established with compacted structural fill. The fill should be a granular material compacted to at least 100% of standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. The fill should extend laterally beyond the footings a distance at Least equal to the depth of fill beneath the footings. Voids created by the removal of large rocks should be backfilled with compacted sand and gravel or with concrete. 6) A representative of the geotechnical engineer should observe all footing excavations prior to concrete placement to evaluate bearing conditions. FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS Foundation walls and retaining structures which are laterally supported and can be expected to undergo only a slight amount of deflection should be designed for a lateral earth pressure computed on the basis of an equivalent fluid unit weight of 50 pcf for backfill consisting of the on-site soils. Cantilevered retaining structures which are separate from the residence and can be expected to deflect sufficiently to mobilize the full active earth pressure condition should be designed for a lateral earth pressure computed on the basis of an equivalent fluid unit weight of 40 pcf for backfill consisting of the on-site sorts. Backfill should consist of predominately granular soils and not contain vegetation, topsoil, or oversized rock. -6 - All foundation and retaining structures should be designed for appropriate hydrostatic and surcharge pressures such as adjacent footings, traffic, construction materials and equipment. The pressures recommended above assume drained conditions behind the walls and a horizontal backfill surface. The buildup of water behind a wall or an upward sloping backfill surface will increase the lateral pressure imposed on a foundation wall or retaining structure. An underdrain should be provided to prevent hydrostatic pressure buildup behind walls. Backfill should be placed in uniform lifts and compacted to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Backfill in pavement and walkway areas should be compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density. Care should be taken not to overcompact the backfill or use large equipment near the wall, since this could cause excessive lateral pressure on the wall. Some settlement of deep foundation wall backfill should be expected, even if the material is placed correctly, and could result in distress to facilities constructed on the backfill. The lateral resistance of foundation or retaining wall footings will be a combination of the sliding resistance of the footing on the foundation materials and passive earth pressure against the side of the footing. Resistance to sliding at the bottoms of the footings can be calculated based on a coefficient of friction of 0.50. Passive pressure of compacted backfill against the sides of the footings can be calculated using an equivalent fluid unit weight of 350 pcf. The coefficient of friction and passive pressure values recommended above assume ultimate soil strength. Suitable factors of safety should be included in the design to limit the strain which will occur at the ultimate strength, particularly in the case of passive resistance. Fill placed against the sides of the footings to resist lateral loads should be compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. FLOOR SLABS The natural on-site soils, exclusive of topsoil, are suitable to support lightly :„, loaded' slab -on -grade construction. The clay soils appear to be expansive and should be -7- ' removed from beneath the building area. To reduce the effects of some differential movement, floor slabs should be separated from all bearing walls and columns with expansion joints which allow unrestrained vertical movement. Floor slab control joints should be used to reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking. The requirements for joint spacing and slab reinforcement should be established by the designer based on experience and the intended slab use. A minimum 4 inch layer of free -draining gravel should be placed beneath basement level slabs to facilitate drainage. This material should consist of minus 2 inch aggregate with at least 50% retained on the No. 4 sieve and less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve. All fill materials for support of floor slabs should be compacted to at least 95% of maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Required fill can consist of the on-site gravels devoid of vegetation, topsoil and oversized rock. UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM Although free water was not encountered during our exploration, it has been our experience in the area that local perched groundwater may develop during times of heavy precipitation or seasonal runoff. Frozen ground during spring runoff can create a perched condition. We recommend below -grade construction, such as retaining walls and basement areas, be protected from wetting and hydrostatic pressure buildup by an underdrain system. The drains should consist of drainpipe placed in the bottom of the wall backfill surrounded above the invert level with free -draining granular material. The drain should be placed at each level of excavation and at Least 1 foot below lowest adjacent finish grade and sloped at a minimum 1% to a suitable gravity outlet or to a drywell. Free -draining granular material used in the underdrain system should contain less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve, less than 50% passing the No. 4 sieve and have a maximum size of 2 inches. The drain gravel backfill should be at least 11 feet deep. H-PGEO H 5,,-..;.•r:- -8- ` URFACE DRAINAGE The following drainage precautions should be observed during construction and maintained at all times after the residence has been completed: 1) Inundation of the foundation excavations and underslab areas should be avoided during construction. 2) Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density in pavement and slab areas and to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density in landscape areas. 3) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions. We recommend a minimum slope of 6 inches in the first 10 feet in unpaved areas and a minimum slope of 3 inches in the first 10 feet in paved areas. 4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill. LThIITATIONS This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no warranty either expressed or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the exploratory borings drilled at the Locations indicated on Fig. 1, the proposed type of construction and our experience in the area. Our findings include interpolation and extrapolation of the subsurface conditions identified at the exploratory borings and variations in the subsurface conditions may not become evident until excavation is performed. If cbnditions encountered during construction appear different from those described in this report, we should be notified so that re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes. We are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our -9 - information. As the project evolves, we should provide continued consultation and field services during construction to review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations, and to verify that the recommendations have been appropriately interpreted. Significant design changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommendations presented herein. We recommend on-site observation of excavations and foundation bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a representative of the geotechnical engineer. Sincerely, HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEO �'.'•::�:_,_ , INC. Jordy Z. Adamson, Reviewed by: Daniel E. Hardin, P.E. JZA(Itsw REFERENCES Chen -Northern, Inc., 1991, Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Study, Proposed Aspen Glen Development, Garfield County, Colorado, prepared for Aspen Glen Company, dated December 20, 1991, Job No. 4 112 92. Chen -Northern, Inc., 1993, Geotechnical Engineering Study for Preliminary Plat Design, Aspen Glen Developmen4 Garfield County, Colorado, prepared for Aspen Glen Company, dated May 28,1993, Job No. 4112 92. H -P GE0TECH 'APPROXIMATE SCALE 1. se40. 6052 6052 RIVER'S BEND r 6050 L- �� r i r LOTdor /BOUNDARIES rr / r BORING 1 / r / r ___ LOT A-12 LOT A-11 • BORING 2 BUILDING SETBACK LINES J 6050 LOT A-10 6050-- -- - — -- -- — 6040 z- — = — 6050 — — — _ 6038'_ =_=................ _------� • 6040 _ 100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN Th HEPWORTH-PAWLAK 102 742 GEOTECHNICAL, INC. LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS 6036 Fig. _. 1 — 6050 6045 6040 6035 102 742 BORING 1 ELEV.= 6050' 15/12 1110.12.5 00 -106 -Meal 15/12 T BORING 2 ELEV.= 6049' 25/6,10/1 WC -3.2 +4-54 -200.13 Note: Explanatlon of symbols le shorn on Flg. 3. HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS :. .., . ,.v._ r,}-� t.tx«r--::fir du 6050-- 6045 050—_ 6045 6040 6035 Fig. 2 'SPEND: ® TOPSAIL; sandy silty clay, organic, firm, slightly moist, brown. —7 15/12 1 • NOTES: 1. Exploratory borings were drilled on November 20, 2002 with a 4—inch diameter continuous flight power auger. - 2. Locations of exploratory borings were measured approximately by pacing from property corners staked in the field and shown on the site plan provided 3. Elevations of exploratory borings were based on topographic lines on site plan provided and were checked by Instrument level. 4. The exploratory boring locutions and elevations should be considered accurate only to the degree Implied by the method used. 5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory boring logs represent the approximate boundaries between material types and transitions may be gradual. 6. No free water was encountered in the borings at the time of drilling or when checked 12 days later. Fluctuation in water level may occur with time. 7. Laboratory Testing Results: WC a Water Content (% ) DD s Dry Density (pef ) +4 a Percent retained on No. 4 sieve. —200 a Percent passing No. 200 sieve. CLAY (CL); silty, slightly sandy, occasional gravel, stiff, slightly moist, reddish brown. GRAVEL (GM); silty. sandy, with cobbles and boulders, dense, slightly moist, brown, subrounded to rounded rock. Relatively undisturbed drive sample•, 2—inch I.D. California liner sample. Drive sample; standard penetration test (SPT), 1 3/8 inch I.D. split spoon sample, ASTM D-1586. Drive sample blow count indicates that 15 blows of a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches were required to drive the California or SPT sampler 12 inches. Practical drilling refusal. Where shown above bottom of log, indicates that multiple attempts were mode to advance the boring. Depth at which boring hod caved when measured on December 2, 2002. '102 742 HEPWORTH—PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL INC. LEGEND AND NOTES Fig. 3 �`s: --'�'@=it'�«iod�if+s:•a.:�.-:kfa�rx•r.,..a.,P��:. fA • M101000ERR MULTI. EE fidget°, f 4 Ift 71? 0 tl SI. 15 IUI. OLIN. Ilei 4 S. 1 l . 10 10 30 40 m SO 70 SO OO SEE AWNS U.S. STAMMe) N 003 O A ana SOJAS MOMS 30 we 11/r r re r Igo OSIER • SIM mia • • ala lam a Si AM Mb an i Sr a S IS SS Si SI SI 100 — r J01 JIS JOS .000 .019 SW JTI .075 .300 JOS 1.10 e.31 11, L0110 /9.0 DIAMETER OF PARTICLES IN MILLIMETERS MAY 10 SLT GRAVEL 54 % LIQUID LIMIT : % 37.5 TS° 1112 27 903 1 1.E I VL 1II110E F ne air WM 1 SAND 33 % SILT AND CLAY 13 % PLASTICITY INDEX % .: » OO 00 70 OO 00 40 30 m f0 0 P $91:[r SAMPLE OF: Silty Sandy Gravel 102 742 HEP WOR TH-PANA-AK .' GEOTECHNICAL, INC.-• .;; GRADATION TEST RESULTS 5 ate:y.•.Sy ,�'S.°+!c e i�$f9�a°>�4t•`daisi�c4i±?IEI�'�r. S::P.:^l�t., 5'.aair�M�4. CV • .,0 § ( SOIL OR BEDROCK TYPE [slightly sandy silty clay Lsilty sandy gravel II UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (PBS |gIe I [|§a Al k E■k| iia. G 2 |1` i \ , gg r 64 |0i r° f|§Lo /.ci § \. I |` : � |%>, / \ \ \ \ - . \ . \ / . » # _ \ - \ - / , \ * a & \ « k :ym Tim Holliday Subject: Dockery Start Date: Thursday, December 09, 2004 Due Date: Friday, January 07, 2005 Status: In Progress Percent Complete: 0% Total Work: Actual Work: 0 hours 0 hours Owner. Tim Holliday Sent 30 day letter on 2/26/04 Resent letter on 3/29104 for 30 day letter Renewed permit on 4-23-04 Sent new 30 day letter on 11-23-04 Andy gave them 30 days to finish 1-7-05 1 r• Date: 02 -Z(o --oc" To3e,epi,„ cj‹e.iei wrav e etanae Gri Sl hi) Garfield County BUILDING & PLANNING DEPARTMENT Code Compliance Office shackett i garfield-county.com Dear Permit Holder, Please refs to your building permit mrmber 2i2-19 ,issued 3- Z b V) A routine review of our open building permits indicates that we have not received a request for an inspection on this permit since 9'— to -O 3 . Please be advised that building permits expire, pa Uniform Building Code, section 106.4.4. "Every permit issued by the building official under the provisions of this code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or wvrk authorized by such permit is not commenced within 180 days from the date of such permit, or if the building or work authorized by such permit is mended or abandoned at any time after the work has commenced fora period of 180 days. Before such work can be recommenced, a new permit shall first be obtained to do so, and the fee therefore shall be one half the amount required for a new permit for such work, provided no changer have been made or will be made in the original plans and specifications for such work, and provided further that such suspension or abandonment has not exceeded one year. In order to renew action on a permit after expiration, the permittee shall pay a new full permit fee." Please contact this office at your vay earliest convenience, in writing to advise us about the status of your permitted work If you have not responded within thirty days from the receipt of this notice the permit will be closed and a permanent notation wil be pbaaxd is She property records at the County Assessors office that isdiates that the work permitted was not inspected, is not approved and that the building or area may not be legally occupied. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerd Tatifol6day @nae Mead Building Inspectors 108 8th Street, Suite 201, Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Tim Holliday t , . Subject: Dockery Status: In Progress Percent Complete: 0% 6' /thy' i—F',; Total Work: 0 hours /,f{ y ` Y ; (:) c 3 3 S Actual Work: 0 hours Owner. Tim Hollidayv c d' - 2 Cn `r uli,i i Sent 30 day letter on 2/26/04 Resent letter on 3/29/04 for 30 day letter Renewed permit on 4-23-04 Sent new 30 day letter on 11-23-04 Andy gave them 30 days to finish 1-7-05 Garfield County Assessor Property Search Page 1 of 2 Garfield County Colorado Assessor & Treasurer Property Information Data Updated Quarterly with the last update released on 10/01/2004 Tax information is updated as of noon each Friday and will be available for viewing by 5 pm the following Monday. Search > Results > Detail Get Map M4_! Owner Name: Krisujen Realty L.p. Type: Primary Address: 405 N State Rt 17 Paramus, NJ 07652-2900 Property Address: 000263 River's Bend Carbondale, CO Account number: R830011 Parcel number: 239329101011 Sub -division: Aspen Glen Flg 1 Condo: Neighborhood: ASPEN GLEN SUB -DIV FLG 1 Area: 083 Legal: SECT,TWN,RNG:29-7-88 SUB:ASPEN GLEN FLG 1 LOT:A-11 PRE:R111395 Total Actual Value: $620,000.00 Taxes 2003 taxes payable in $3887.58 2004: ' Amount Paid: $3,887.58 Land Actual Value: $220,000.00 Land size: Square feet: Acres: 0.62 http://www. mitchandco.com/realestate/garfield/propertyDisplay.cfm?AccountNo=R830011 11/30/2004 Date;J -Zt$ -eel To:.\�% Do siei C7�W i2L,,ecsb Cof'o %n R! baa Garfield County BUILDING & PLANNING DEPARTMENT Code Compliance Office shackett(a,garfield-coun ty.com Dear Permit Holder, Please refer to your building permit number (9 39 , issued 3— Z!v Z ) A route review of our open building permits indicates that we have not received a request for an inspection on this permit since 5?- lo -0 3 Please be advised that building permits expire, per Uniform Building Code, section 106.4.4. "Every permit issued by the building official under the provisions of this code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by such permit is not commenced within 180 days from the date of such permit, or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned at any time after the work has commenced for a paiod of 180 days. Before such work can be recommenced, a new permit shall first be obtained to do so, and the fee therefore shall be one half the amount required for a new permit for such work, provided no changes have been made or will be made in the original plans and specifications for such work, and provided further that such suspension or abandonment has not exceeded one year. In order to resew action on a permit alter expiration, the permittee shall pay a new full permit fee." Please contact this office at your very earliest convenience, in writing, to advise us about the status of your permitted work If you have not responded within thirty days from the receipt of this notice the permit will be closed and a pennant notation wall be placed in the property records at the County Assessors o/Tiee that indicates that the work permitted was not inspected, is not approved and that the building or area may not be legally occupied. Thank you for your cooperation. Sinoael� 7silloaday ears Med Building Inspectors 108 8th Street, Suite 201, Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 0 .o E 3 . O cri U N c 0. N O • N 00 C to 0)a C7°' 0 ti rn 0 c O 0� CI' N N N CO 0 0 COUNTY OF GARFIELD - BUILDING DEPARTMENT CORRECTION NOTICE 0 O O 0 al . fn 0 ie 0 01 3 °D off d Oi - c O 0 a 0 2 N 109 8th St. ✓ S d m w c N c c l0 O o a: ` a w • V N 0) N c « o o y 0 tiy ar N a cu • 2 C c N ▪ 1:3c L W « N N d N E When correction(s) have been made, call for inspection. When correction(s) have been made, call for inspection at 970-384-5003. N 1 0 6 Phone (970) 945-8212 N Job A. dress Owne '`• O� ` Address n��n Contractor * ' �`� Addres�34 ti.K_aa(a3 BUILDING Assessor's Parcel No34W RF O I Ott Date 3/a(0/03 Se cks: Front I,,,, y,,, Rear RH tr. l• �.il}'`NSPECTIONS Soils Test 4I /� Footing 1 'r✓ . $.2-d3,0►n- 4-q-793,0111- FoundationVivates -9-a" j1/S9e kti 142 Z.-103km Grout 441-03 - Underground Plumbing Rough Plumbing 6- -03 /OWL FramingSSSS 0 Insulation Si Liu i g-lP ge/A Roofing ,,,,�,,// Drywall / DF++t� Gas Piping (t'- (o -C3 ,Qyvl 3d t°W een �" 5 eGem ' J 3 -z-i oil one gan-ssaa hone /alb -529a LO LH Zoning , Weatherproofing Mechanical /3--Z.I `a+! Electrical Rough (State) raw /Q1M1A Electrical Final (State) FinaLid _OT 7Checklist Completed') Certificate Occupancy # Date Septic System # Date Final Other ?tiny. p� /. (oe aw id-Cjk# 3Sd O BUILDING PERMIT . • ELI) COUNTY, .COLORADO= Date Issue + 'A:toned Area Permit No. AGREEMENT In consideration of the issuance of this permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with all laws and regulations related to the zoning, location; construction and erection of the proposed structure for which this permit is granted, and further agrees that if the above said regulations are not fully complied with in the zoning, location, erection and construction of the above described structure, the permit may then be revoked by notice from the County Buildinf Inspector , • IMMEDIATE BECOME NULL AND VOID. Use I & Add Legal Descriptio Owner Setbacks Fro6t Si'e Side Rear This Card Must Be Posted So It is Plainly Visible From The Street Until Final Inspection. INSPECTION RECORD Footing fl////•• 42 "63 4 -11-03 Foundation' -1 -03 TO - "2"i — , afilL Underground Plumbing L,41,b Insulation Wens t'f11s'-a^"'e-0 7-48c-03 • Rough Plumbing 6_6_193�lv l Drywall ,X /6,fr1) Chimney & Vent ;9_ 2/ _d1/4-0-Elec?ric Final (by ',tate Inspectur)71l1(fi11 Gas Piping & _ (x-.03 � Finalc2_a,--03—nL_ Electric Rt,,tL , ;,, , ; c Septic Final Framing _703 (To include Rootin plat and Windows and Doors installed). Notes: ALL LISTED ITEMS MUST BE INSPECTED WHETHER INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR, AND APPROVED BEFORE COVERING - UNDERGROUND OR ABOVE GROUND. THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE Phone 3845003 109 8th Street County Courthouse Glenwood Springs, Colorado. \.RI) APPROVED Date t IF PLACED OUTSIDE - VER WITH CLEAR PLASTIC