Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Application- Permit
Job Address GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING, SANITATION, and PLANNING DEPARTMENT cp X09 8th, Street, Suite 303 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601(970) 945-8212 CtLt!7 (631q-0 1 Ltr-n' // (11aL Nature of Work Building Perrn±t Use of Building Owner GAP���( Contractor u No. 8557 res at? 3-16, -o'f Clerk GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION GARFIELD COUN'PY (OLENWOODSPRINGS), COLOI 1DQ 1 LEPHON : (970) 945-8212 u r tO$ADDRESS: 1 2 3 4 5 6 LOT NO. 40 P/Fr7rNG 117,•4A/40, Glenwood Springs, CO. INSPECTION LINE: (970)384-500: PARCEL/SCHEDULE No. 2185-273-16-040 BLOCKNO. SUBDIVISION/EXEMPTION .Glenwood S rin s Fire Dept. Shaw Construction LLC MTN. 8th Si., Glenwood Spg, CO ? Horizon.Dr., Grand Jct, CO d' IT e-cture 525uLake Dillon Dr., Dillon, CO f84-6430. '"� 45-8506 e 242--9236 •' I : ? (970) ---- 13-7151 sq.smormm 4979 eQ°Fr.OFLOT 87,120 PTERRrr 30i ueloBi738 PIO. WHAMS 1 Fire Station 7 Dmm""14 Construction of a Fire Station 8 .CLAaSOFiPO OADDITION OALTERATPON MOW ORFDSOVS 9 -*Awn: NA OSQ7I8.E ODOi:BLB CARPORT: OHII1@S C9Qa8IE 10 0 mmivmmar NA 'VACQAISONOFWORK:s , 7o01000 Oca:szac83ymmt PO3ALjEeP£ICj No ADNSTFD VALCAEION:s datrE tAx SPBCIALCgNDRIONR: NOTICE A SEPARATE ELECfRICA1L pERNETr IS REQUIRED AND MUST BE ISSUED BY THE STATE OF COLORADO. THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOJD IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION AtYi UORTZ'E.D IS Noor COMMENCED WHEW 1R0 DAYS, ORIF CONSTRUCTION OR WOR IS SUSPENDED OR -ABANDONED FORA PERIOD OF ISO DAYS AT ANY TEAS AFTERWORK I3 COMMENCED. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT II HAVE READ AND I.YAI,MIED THIS APPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAME TC) BE TRUE AND CORRECT; ALL PROVISIONS O$ LAWS GOVERN/MOTELS .TYPEOFWORK WELL BECOMPLIED wan WIAEMERSPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE .GRANTING OF A PEEMIT DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULATING CONSTRUCTION OR THE PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTION - � A iLk - 18 DZ r Dt au41D . agcnthavin3 ra . dnad� ..d nc Zcv Acme. uiiding•He.t -ppmvai/ ata amnia Dept. 7 Agpra VD C5 PLAN CEECKFEE: PERMIT FEE: TOTAL FEE: • DATE PEPM T ISSUER?: OCC: GROUP: CONST: TYPE: V ZONING: SETBACKS: • MANU. HOME: f 1 AGREEMENT - PERMISSION IS HERESY GRANTO TEE APPLICANT AS OWNER, CONTRACTOR ANt71Q1t naLAGENr OF THE CONTRACTOR OR. OWNER To CQNS,TRUCT THE STRUCT[I DETAILED ON PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SIIIIMIITED TO AND REVIEWED BY TEiETIUIE,DINGDP.PARTMENI'. IN CONSIDERATION OF THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT, THE STGNEE. HERBY AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL BUILDING CODES AND LA1.1D USE REGULATIONS ADOPTl CAI/MID COUN IP RSUANT TO AUTHORITY GIVEN IN 30.22.201 CRS AS AMENDED. THE STO R RATTIER. AGREES THAT ]FOSE ABOVE SAID ORDINANCES ARE I\IOT 1 COMPLIED WITH IDI THE LOCATION, ERECTION, CONSTRUCTION AND USE OF TETE ABOVE DESCRIBED STRUCTURE, THE PERMIT MAY THEN BE REVOKED BY NOTICE THE =TNT? . THAT TEEN AND THERE sr 3fl4 LBECOMENULL AND VOID THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT BASED UPON PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA SHALL NOT PREVENT TEE BUU.DINGOFFICIA% RROM--TEIERBATTER. REQUIRIN CORRECTION OF ERRORS IN SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND' OTHER DATA OR FRO PREVENTING BUILDING OPERATION BEING CARRIED ON THEREUNDER WE VIOLATION OFTHIS CODE OR ANY OTHER ORDINANCE OR REGULATION OF THIS JURiSDICTIQN. . THE REVIEW OF it&t, SUBMITTED PLANS ANE ..SPECIFICATIONS AND INSPECTIONS CONDUf:LW THEREAFTER .DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ACCEPTANCE Of RESPONSIBILITIES OR.LFABIUY1iES EY GAREELD. COUNTY FOR ERRORS, OMISSIONS OR IHSCREPANCIES., THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR TETE E ITEMS AND IIc4PLEMENr DEIRIIIG CONSTRUCTION RESTS SPEOIP'1CALF.Y WITEETHE ARcBrFECT. DESIGNER, BUILDER AND OWNER, COMMENTS ARE INTENDED kw, (`!NSERVATIVE AND IIS SU: OF THE OWNERS INTEREST. Gazfoml003 IHEREBY ACKAIOWL.E,DCSTHATIHAVE READ AND UNDERSTANDTEE AGREEMENT ABOVE. (INITIAL) 1-4 ISDS NO. & FEE: CL'14 -tj The following items are required by Garfield County for a final inspection: 1. A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector; 2. Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department posted where readily visible from access road; 3. A finished roof, a lockable house, complete exterior siding, exterior doors and windows installed, a complete kitchen with cabinets, a sink with hot & cold running water, non-absorbent kitchen floor coverings, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove and refrigerator, all necessary plumbing; 4. A complete bathroom, with washbowl, tub or shower, toilet stool, hot and cold running water, non-absorbent floors and walls finished and a privacy door; 5. All steps outside or inside over three (3) steps must have handrails, guard rails on balconies or decks over 30" high constructed to all 1997 UBC requirements; 6. Outside grading done to where water will detour away from the building; 7. Exceptions to the outside steps, decks and grading may be made upon the demonstration of extenuating circumstances, i.e. weather, but a Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until all the required items are completed and a final inspection. made. A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. ****CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (C.O.) IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATING PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET. I understand and agree to abide by the above conditions for occupancy, u$e and the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the dwelling under building permit # 557 Signature Bpcont082002 (0 Z oZ Date Plans to be included for a Building Permit must be on draft paper at least 18"x 24"" and drawn to scale. Plans must include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations all sides with decks, balcony steps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the finish grade Iine. A section showing in detail, from the bottom of the footing to the top of the roof, including re -bar, anchor bolts, pressure treated plates, floor joists, wall studs and spacing, insulation, sheeting, house -rap, (which is required), siding or any approved building material. A window schedule. A door schedule. A floor framing plan, a roofing framing plan, roof must be designed to withstand a 40 pound per square foot. up to 7,000 feet in elevation, an 80 M.P.H. windshear, wind exposure B, windload of 15 pounds per square foot and a 36 inch frost depth. All sheets to be identified by number and indexed. All of the above requirements must be met or your plans will be returned. All plans submitted must be incompliance with the 1997 UBC, UMC and 1997 UPC. Applicants are required to indicate appropriately and to submit completed checklist at time of application for a permit: 1. Is a site plan included that identifies the location of the proposed structure, additions or other buildings, setback easements, and utility easements showing distances to the property lines from each corner of the proposed structure prepared by a licensed surveyor and has the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing? Slopes of 30% or more on properties must be show on site plan. Yes Alb -WI" v a- MA tice% tithe rAev. s h+nv �.. [] ' ' j /� C JrtL�' 5 /(4t if..i l �'i�C� a�5 2. Does the site plan when applicable include the location of the I.S.D.S. (Individual K -S Sewage Disposal System) and distances to the property lines, wells (on subject property and adjacent properties), streams or water courses? This information must be certified by a licensed surveyor with their signature and professional stamp on the design. Yes No Not necessary for this project 3. Are the plans submitted for application construction drawings and not drawings that are stamped or marked identifying them as "Not for construction, for permit issuance only", "Approval drawings only", "For permit issuance only" or similar language? Yes ! ` No Not necessary for this project 4. Is the I.S.D.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System) designed, stamped and signed by a Colorado Registered Engineer? Yes No Not necessary for this project ,, 2 5. Does the site plan indicate the location and direction of the State, County or private road access;ng the property? Yes t 6. Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all reinforcing steel in accordance with the uniform building code or per stamped engineered design? Yes No Not necessary for this project 7. If the building is a pre-engineered structure, is there a stamped, signed engineered foundation plan for this building? Yes No Not necessary for this project ( 8. Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl spaces and the clearances required between wood and earth? Yes No Not necessary for project x 9. Do the plans indicate the size and location of the ventilation openings for the attic, roof joist spaces and soffits? Yes No Not necessary for this project X 10. Do the plans include design loads as required under the Uniform Building Code for roof snowloads, (a minimum of 40 pounds per square foot in Garfield County)? Yes k No Not necessary for this project 11. Do the plans include design loads as required for floor loads under the Uniform Building Code Chapter 16 and Tables 16A, 16B and 16C? Yes )S No Not necessary for this project 12. Does the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor, and roof construction? Yes < No Not necessary for this project 13. Is the wind speed and exposure design included in the plan? Yes iC No Not necessary for this project 14. Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists, wall studs, ceiling joists, roof rafters or joists or trusses? Yes a( No Not necessary for this project 15. Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method of positive connection of all columns and beams? Yes ( No Not necessary for this project 3 16. Does the plan indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the highest point of the building or addition measured at mid span between the ridge and the cave down to existing grade contours? Yes No ?C. Not necessary for this project 17. Does the plan include any stove or zero clearance fireplace planned for installation including make and model and Colorado Phase II certifications or Phase 1I EPA certification? Yes No Not necessary for this project 7 18. Does the plan include a masonry fireplace including a fireplace section indicating design to comply with the Uniform Building Code Chapter 31? Yes No x Not necessary for this project 19. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that egress/rescue windows from sleeping rooms and/or basements comply with the requirements of the Uniform Building Code? Yes x No Not necessary for this project 20. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that windows provide natural light and ventilation for all habitable rooms? Yes jC No Not necessary for this project 21. Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass doors, glazing immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as a walking surface; sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub enclosures and specify safety glazing for these areas? Yes ?C No Not necessary for this project 22. Do the plans include a complete design for all mechanical systems planned for installation in this building? Yes K- No Not necessary for this project 23. Have all areas in the building been accurately identified for the intended use? (Occupancy as identified in the Uniform Building Code Table 5-A) Yes ?C No Not necessary for this project 24. Does the plan indicate the quantity, form, use and storage of any hazardous materials that may be in use in this building? Yes No S Not necessary for this project 4 3 7 p 4 25. Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces, boilers and water heaters indicated on the plan? Yes No Not necessary for this project )( 26. Do the plans indicate the location and dimension of restroom facilities and if more than four employees and both sexes are employed, facilities for both sexes? Yes No Not necessary for this project 27. Do the plans indicate that restrooms and access to the building are handicapped accessible? Yes ` No Not necessary for this project 28. Have two (2) complete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the application? Yes .. No 29. Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other construction code requirements? Yes No Not necessary for this project 30. Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a final inspection by the Garfield County Building Department? Yes )C No 31. Do you understand that approval for design and/or construction changes are required prior to the implementation of these changes? Yes ?<- No 32. Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a "Plan Review" fee from you at the time of application and that you will be required to pay the "Permit" fee as well as any "Septic System" or "Road Impact" fees required, at the time you pick up your building permit? Yes X No 33. Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the Uniform Building Code including approval on a final inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy and occupancy of the building? Yes No 34. Are you aware that the person signing the Permit Application whether the "Owner", ('Agent of the Owner", "General Contractor", "Contractor" or otherwise, signing the application is the party responsible for the project complying with the Uniform Codes? Yes )C. No 5 s. 35. Are you aware that twenty-four (24) hour notice is required for all inspections? Inspections will be made from Battlement Mesa to West Glenwood in the mornings and from Glenwood Springs to Carbondale, in the afternoon. All inspections must be called in by 3:30 p.m. the day before. Failure to give twenty-four (24) hour notice for inspections will delay your inspection one (1) day. Inspections are to be called in to 384-5003. yet? 36. Are you aware that prior to issuance of a building permit you are required to show proof of a driveway access permit or obtain a statement from the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department stating one is not necessary? You can contact the Road & Bridge Department at 625-8601. Yes No 37. Do you understand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed Electrician and Plumber to perform installations and hookups? The license number will be required at time of inspection. Yes '(. No 38. Are you aware, that on the front of the building permit application you will need to fill in the Parcel/ Schedule Number for the lot you are applying for this permit on prior to issuance of the building permit? Your attention in this is appreciated. Yes ? No I hereby acknowledge that I have read, understand, and answered these questions to the best of my ability. C Signature Phone: q 0 • z42- `t 2 *f0 (days); 10 Z ' 5o4 j (evenings) Project Name: S cA-Tic t) b 5 V Project Address: W T tkEtftri lrkE: At(A)00b Note: Date S'FR.c.414$ c,t� If you answered "No" on any of these questions you may be required to provide this information at the request of the Building Official prior to beginning the plan review process. Delays in issuing the permit are to be expected. Work may not proceed without the issuance of the permit. *If you have answered "Not necessary for this project" on any of the questions and it is determined by the Building Official that the information is necessary to review the application 6 01/01!1994 02:16 1-970--726-0736 APRIL 24, 2003 TO: GARFIEL© COUNTY BUILDING DEPARTMENT RE: GLENWOOD SPRINGS FIRE STATION #3 1850 COUNTY ROAD 117 SHAW:LOT 53 WILJAIR PAGE 01 i, 7Ki c,4\RviEtn cots mrt BIA LDIOG & P1. Shaw Construction agrees to complete the paving, final grading and the site landscaping at the new Fire Station located at 1880 County Road 117, as per approved plans from the Garfield County Building Department. This work will be complete no later than May 24, 2003. Dan Grisham Shaw Construction SHAW C..O;N S R ;C`` .O N April 24, 2003 TO: GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING DEPARTMENT RE: Glenwood springs Fire Station 1880 County Road 117 It is the intent of Shaw Construction to complete the paving, site drainage and final grading as per approved plans from the Garfield County Building Department. Dan Grisham Shaw Construction Garfield County Building and Planning Department 109 8th Street, Suite 303 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 970.945.8212 Fax 970.384.3470 Plan analysis based on the 1997 Uniform Building Code Project Number: Date: October 7, 2002 Project Name: Glenwood Springs Fire House #3 Address: Four Mile Road, Glenwood Springs, CO Contractor: Shaw Const. Occupancy: B Architect: Oz Arch. Construction: V -N Engineer: W. Newell Report By: Andy Schwaller NOTE: The code items listed in this report are not intended to be a complete listing of all possible code requirements in the 1997 UBC. It is a guide to selected sections of the code. # SHEET IDENTIFICATION CORRECTION REQUIRED 1, T1.1 Building and Code Info Plans indicated project is built to the 1994 UBC. Project should reflect the 1997 UBC. Please verify or amend the plans to the 1997 UBC with architect. 2 A Driveway Permit was not included the the application. Please contact the Garfield County Road and Bridge at 945-1223 regarding this permit. 3 A 2.1 Room 105 The lavatory is indicated to be within the water closet clear space as per ANSI A117.1. See attached. 4 Include a copy of the soils report for the site to be built on. ---- Sec. 1804.3 5 A3.1 Room 104 Support of mechanical above room is not clear. If suspended from trusses, provide letter from truss engineer showing detail. Otherwise please clarify. 6 S4 Section 13 Please indicate weld size. 7 S3 Sec. 10/S4 Please indicated the stud spacing for this shear wall. E 4. Pag0 # 2 Code review for: Project Id.: Address: 8 Cl The structural design for the retaining wall is not shown. It may be section 8 page S1. Please clarify. Chapter'6. fPurrAing Elements and Facilities ICC/ANSI A117.1-1998 603.2.3 Doors. Doors shall not swing into the clear floor or ground space or clearance for any fixture. EXCEPTION: Where the room is for indi- vidual use and a clear floor or ground space complying with Section 305.3 is provided within the room, beyond the arc of the door swing. 603.3 Mirrors. Mirrors shall be mounted with the bottom edge of the reflecting surface 40 inches (1015 mm) maximum above the floor or ground. 603.4 Coat Hooks and Shelves. Goat hooks pro- vided within toilet rooms shall accommodate a for- ward reach or side reach complying with Section 308. Where provided, a fold -down shelf shall be 40 inches (1015 mm) minimum and 48 inches (1220 mm) maximum above the floor or ground. 604 Water Closets and Toilet Compartments 604.1 General. Accessible water closets and toilet' compartments shall comply with Section 604. 604.2 Location. The water closet shall be posi- tioned with a wall or partition to the rear and to one side. The centerline of the water closet shall be 16 inches (405 mm) minimum to 18 inches (455 mm) maximum from the side wall or partition, except that the water closet shall be centered in the ambu- latory accessible compartment specified in Section 604.8.2. 604.3 Clearance. 604.3.1 Size. Clearance around the water clos- et shall be 60 inches (1220 mm) minimum, mea- sured perpendicular from the side wall, and 56 inches (1420 mm) minimum, measured per- pendicular from the rear wall No other fixtures 16-18c 405-455 Fig. 604.2 Water Closet Location 40 or o€ s ructions shall be within the water closet clearance. # 604.3.2 Overlap. The clearance around the wa- ter closet shall be permitted to overlap the fix- ture, associated grab bars, tissue dispensers, accessible routes, and clear floor or ground space, or clearances at other fixtures and the wheelchair turning space. 604.4 Height. The top of water closet seats shall be 17 inches (430 mm) minimum and 19 inches (485 mm) maximum above the floor or ground. Seats shall not return automatically to a lifted position. 604.5 Grab Bars. Grab bars for water closets shall comply with Section 609. Grab bars shall be pro- vided on the rear wall and on the side wall closest to the water closet. 604.5.1 Side Wall. Side wall grab bar shall be 42 inches (1065 mm) long minimum, 12 inches (305 mm) maximum from the rear wall and extending 54 inches (1370 mm) minimum from the rear wall. 5 u 4 0 Fig. 604.3.1 Size of Clearance for Water Closet Fig. 604.4 Height of Water Closet 430-485 di i A Garfield County Building and Planning Department 109 8th Street, Suite 303 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 970.945.8212 Fax 970.384.3470 Plan analysis based on the 1997 Uniform Building Code Project Number: Date: October 4, 2002 Project Name: Glenwood Springs Fire House #3 Address: Four Mile Road, Glenwood Springs, CO Contractor: Shaw Const. Occupancy: B Architect: Oz Arch. Construction: V -N Engineer: W. Newell Report By: Andy Schwaller NOTE: The code items listed in this report are not intended to be a complete listing of all possible code requirements in the 1997 UBC. It is a guide to selected sections of the code. Report created using Plan Analyst software by b w & a. (719) 599--5622 Portions of the material contained in this program are reproduced from the Uniform Building Code with the permission of the International Conference of Building Officials. NFEA 13 sprinkler system throughout the building Sprinkler system used for 1 hr. substitution w-- Sec. 508 DIRECTION BOUNDARY NORTH Property line. EAST Property line SOUTH Property line WEST Property line Allowable area increased 100.% for open -- Sec. 505.1 SEPARATION AREA INCREASE 60.0 Feet 90.0 Feet 95.0 Feet 110.0 Feet FIRE PROTECTION 60.0 Feet 90.0 Feet 95.0 Feet 110.0 Feet area on 4 sides. Code review for: Project Id.: Glenwood Springs Fire House #.3 Address: Four Mile Road, Glenwood Springs, CO FL Page # 2 NAME OCC MAX FLR AREA ALLOWED RATIO STATUS 1 Apparatus Bay B ok 2318 16000 0.14 ok 1 Shop utility B ok 156 16000 0.01 ok 1 Bunker Gear $ ok 129 16000 0.01 ok 1 Storage B ok 86 16000 0.01 ok 1 Bath 105 B ok 48 16000 0.0 ok 1 Office B ok 113 16000 0.01 ok 1 Mech/Elec. 8 ok 64 16000 0.0 ok 1 Laundry 8 ok 60 16000 0.0 ok 1 Training B ok 216 16000 0.01 ok 1 Bedroom 112 B ok 174 16000 0.01 ok 1 Bathroom 113 8 ok 95 16000 0.01 ok 1 Bedroom 114- 8 ok 128 16000 0.01 ok 1 Bedroom 115 B ok 174 16000 0.01 ok 1 Bathroom 116 B ok 95 1600Q 0.01 ok 1 bedroom 117 B ok 128 16000 0.01 ok 1 Kitchen B ok 189 16000 0.01 ok 1 Dayroom B ok 492 16000 0.03 ok 1 Non -habitable Area B ok 197 16000 0.01 ok TOTAL FOR FLOOR 4862 16000 0.3 ok BUILDING TOTAL 4862 16000 0.3 ok -- Sec. 504 and Table 5-B The actual height of this building is 30. feet. The maximum height of the building is 40. feet, -- Table 5-8 * f Page # 3 Code review for: Project Id.: Glenwood Springs Eire House #3 Address: Four Mile Road, Glenwood Springs, CO EXTERIOR WALL FIRE RATINGS AND OPENING PROTECTION Table 5-A NORTH For Occupancy B EAST For Occupancy B SOUTH Fo r Occupancy B WEST For Occupancy None 3/4 hour Bearing Wall 0 hour Bearing Wall 0 hour Bearing Wall 0 hour Bearing Wa11 0 hour Not Allowed Non -Bearing Wall 0 hour Non -Bearing Wall 0 hour Non -Bearing Wall 0 hour Non -Bearing Wa11 0 hour Opening Protection None Opening Protection None Opening Protection None Opening Protection None Construction Material Any Construction Material Any Construction Material Any Construction Material Any Parapet Required No Parapet Required No Parapet Required No Parapet Required No - - No fire protection requirements for openings. - - Openings are to be protected with 3/4 hr fire assemblies. 50% of the area of the wall maximum. -- Table 5-A, Footnote 5 & Sec. 503.2.2 Maximum single window size is 84 sq.ft. with no dimension greater than 12 feet. -- Sec. 713.8 - Openings are not permitted in this wall. OTHER BUILDING ELEMENTS MATERIAL Any Any Any Any Any Any Any ELEMENT Interior Bearing wall Interior nonbrg wall Structural Frame Exterior Struct Frame Floor/Ceiling Assembly Roof/Ceiling Assembly Stairs Table 6-A RATING 0 hr 0 hr 0 hr 0 hr 0 hr 0 hr None NOTES See footnote #1 FOOTNOTES: 1) Elements in an exterior wall located where openings are not permitted or where protection of openings is required, shall be protected against external fire exposure as required for exterior bearing walls or the structural frame, whichever is greater. -- Table 6-A, footnote 1 2) Sprinkler System has been used to substitute for 1 hr. ratings. -- Sec.508. See Sec. 508 for exceptions. i 1 A Page # 4 Code review for: Project Id.: Glenwood Springs Fire House #3 Address: Four Mile Road, Glenwood Springs, CO DRAFT STOPS: It there is combustible construction in the roof/ceiling assembly, draft stops shall be installed so that the area of concealed space does not exceed 3,000 square feet and so that the horizontal dimension between stops does not exceed 60 feet. -- Sec. 708.3.1.2.2 When sprinklers are installed in the attic, the area may be 9,000 sq.ft. and the greatest horizontal dimension may be 100 feet. EXIT REQUIREMENTS: FL NAME NUMB MIN MIN PANIC HALLWAY/ DOOR NOTES OCC EXITS WIDTH HDWR CORRIDOR SWING 1 Apparatus Bay 1 Shop utility 1 Bunker Gear 1 Storage 1 Bath 105 1 Office 1 Mech/Elec. 1 Laundry 1 Training 1 Bedroom 112 1 Bathroom 113 1 Bedroom 114 1 Bedroom 115 1 Bathroom 116 1 bedroom 117 1 Kitchen 1 Dayroom 1 Non -habitable Area TOTAL 23 1 4.6 2 1 0.4 1 1 0.2 1 1 0.2 0.0 1 1 0.2 1 1 0.2 1 1 0.2 2 1 0.4 2 1 0.4 1 1 0.2 1 1 0.2 2 1 0.4 1 1 0.2 1 1 0.2 2 1 0.4 5 1 1.0 0.0 47 2 9.4 No N/A No N/A No N/A No N/A No N/A No NIA No N/A No N/A No N/A No N/A No N/A No N/A No N/A No N/A No N/A No N/A No N/A No N/A No N/A 4- N/R N/R N/R N/R NIR N/R N/R N/R N/R N/R N/R N/R N/R N/R N/R N/R N/R N/R N/R In areas where 2 exits are required, the minimum separation is 1/2 of the maximum diagonal of the area or floor. -- Sec. 1004.2.4 When 2 exits are required, exits must be arranged so that it is possible to coo in either direction from any point in a corridor or hallway to a separate exit, except for dead ends not exceeding 20 feet in length. -- Sec. 1004.2.6 Page # 5 Code review for: Project Id.: Glenwood Springs Fire House #3 Address: Four Mile Road, Glenwood Springs, CO Exit signs are required from all areas where 2 or exits are required. -- Sec. 1003.2.8.2, Exception 2 No point to be more than 100 feet from an exit sign. Main exterior exit doors which obviously and clearly are identifiable as exits need not be signed when approved. -- Sec. 1003.2.8.2, Exception 1 Door swing is based on Sec. 1003.3.1.5 except as noted. Occupant load factor is based on Table 10-A. Number of exits is based on Table 10-A except as noted. Exit width is in inches and based on Sec. 1003.2.3 and Table 10-B Exit width is to be divided approximately equally among exits. -- Sec. 1003.2.3.2 Width shown for all areas is based on other egress components. Width shown for 1st floor is based on other egress components. Width shown for other floors & basements is based on stairways. -- Table 10-B For the minimum width of doors, see Sec. 1003.3.1.3 For the minimum width of hallways, see Sec. 1004.3.3.2 For the minimum width of corridors, see Sec. 1004.3.4.2 For the minimum width of stairways, see Sec. 1003.3.3.2 FOOTNOTES: FLUSH AND SURFACE BOLTS: Manually operated edge- or surface -mounted flush bolts and surface bolts or any other type of device that may be used to close or restrain the the door other than by operation of the locking device shall not be used. When automatic flush bolts are used, the door leaf having the automatic flush bolt shall not have a door knob or surface -mounted hardware. The unlatching of any leaf shall not require more than one operation. -- Sec. 1003.3.1.8 LOCKS AND LATCHES: Regardless of the occupant load served, exit doors shall be openable from the inside without the use of a key or any special knowledge or effort. -- Sec. 1003.3.1.8 Key -locking hardware may be used on the main exit when the main exit consists of a single door or pair of doors if there is a sign stating THIS DOOR MUST REMAIN•UNLOCKED DURING BUSINESS HOURS. When unlocked, door(s) must swing without operation of any latching device. -- exc. r a Page # 6 Code review for: Project Id.: Glenwood Springs Fire House #3 Address: Four Mile Road, Glenwood Springs, CO RAMP REQUIREMENTS: 1) The minimum width is 44 inches. If a ramp serves an occupant load of 49 or less, it may be 36 inches wide. If the ramp is serving a high occupant load, check exit table above for required width. -- Sec. 1003.4.2 2) If the ramp is part of the accessible route, the maximum slope is 1:12. All other ramps may have a slope of 1:8 or less. -- Sec. 1003.3.4.3 3) When the slope is greater than 1:20, landings shall be provided at the top, bottom and for each 5 feet of rise. Top landings and intermediate landings shall be at least 5 feet in the direction of travel. Landings at the bottom of ramps shall be at least 6 feet in the direction of travel. -- Sec. 1003.3.4.4 4) Handrails shall be per stair requirements. -- Sec. 1003.3.4.5 5) The surface shall be roughened or shall be of slip -resistant materials. -- Sec. 1003.3.4.8 LANDINGS AT DOORS: 1) A floor or landing shall be provided on each side of doors. When access for persons with disabilities is required. the floor or landing shall not be more than 1/2 inch lower than the threshold. When access is not required, the maximum is 1 inch. -- Sec. 1003.3.1.6 2) Landings shall have a width not less than the width of the stairway or width of the doorway, whichever is the greater. Where a landing serves an occupant load of 50 or more, doors in any position shall not reduce the landing dimension to less than one half it required width. The minimum length in the direction of exit travel is 44 inches. -- Sec. 1003.3.1.7 TRAVEL DISTANCE: (distance to an exit) The maximum travel distance in this building is 250 feet. -- Sec. 1004.2.5. Travel distance shall not be limited within an exit enclosure or exit passageway. -- Sec. 1005.2.2 BUILDING ACCESSIBILITY: In offices (except health-care providers) and retail sales floors, with an aggregate area of not more than 3000 above or below the accessible floor need not be accessible. -- Sec. 1103.2.2 Exception ROOFING REQUIREMENTS: 1) The roofing on this building is required to be Class C. -- Table 15-A 2) See section 1504 and ICBO research reports for requirements. lo Page # 7 Code review for: Project Id.: Glenwood Springs Fire House .43 Address: Four Mile Road, Glenwood Springs, CO AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEMS: If there are 100 or more sprinklers, all valves controlling the water supply and water -flow switches shall be electrically monitored. Valve monitoring and water -flow alarm and trouble signals shall be distinctly different and shall be automatically transmitted to an approved central station, remote station or proprietary monitoring station. -- Sec. 904.3.1 WARNING: -- If any of the above require a sprinkler system throughout the building, then the sprinkler system cannot be used for one hour substitution. -- Sec. 508 STANDPIPE REQUIREMENTS: There is no requirement for a standpipe. -- Table 9-A FOOTNOTES: VENTILATION: All areas customarily occupied by humans shall be provided with natural ventilation by means of openable exterior openings with an area of not less than 1/20 of the total floor area or shall be provided with a mechanically operated ventilation system. Such system shall be capable of supplying a minimum of 15 cubic feet per minute of outside air per occupant. -- Sec. 1202.2.1 WALL AND CEILING FINISH: 1) Wall and ceiling finish materials Sec. 804.1 and Table 8-B. 2) Carpeting oh the ceiling is required spread rating. -- Sec. 804.2 3) Textile wall coverings shall have Class I flame spread and shall be protected by automatic sprinklers or meet acceptance criteria of U.B.C. Standard No. 8-2 -- Sec. 4) Toilet room floors shall have a smooth, hard nonabsorbent that extends upward onto the walls at least 5 inches. -- Sec. 807.1.1 5) Walls within 2 feet of the front and sides of urinals and closets shall have a smooth, hard nonabsorbent surface. -- Sec. 807.1.2 are required to comply with to have a Class I flame rating. the 805 surface water Page # 8 Code review for: Project Id.: Glenwood Springs Fire House #3 Address: Four Mile Road, Glenwood Springs, CO INSULATION NOTES: 1) All insulation material including facings are required to have a flame -spread rating of 25 or less and a maximum smoke density of 450 unless it is in a concealed space and the facing is in contact with a wall or ceiling. -- Sec. 707.3 exc.2 2) Foam plastic insulations are required to be protected. -- Sec. 2602 ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS: For B occupancy Page # 9 Code review for: Project Id.: Glenwood Springs Fire House #3 Address: Four Mile Road, Glenwood Springs, CO GLAZING REQUIREMENTS All glazing in hazardous locations is required to be of safety glazing material. -- Sec. 2406.3 & 2406.4 Locations: 1) Glazing in ingress and egress doors except jalousies. 2) Glazing in fixed and sliding panels of sliding door assemblies and panels in swinging doors other than wardrobe doors. 3) Glazing in storm doors. 4) Glazing in all unframed swinging doors. 5) Glazing in doors and enclosures for hot tubs, whirlpools, saunas, steam rooms, bathtubs and showers. Glazing in any portion of a building wall enclosing these compartments where the bottom exposed edge of the glazing is less than 60 inches above a standing surface and drain inlet. 6) Glazing in fixed or operable panels adjacent to a door where the nearest exposed edge of the glazing is within a 24 -inch arc of either vertical edge of the door in a closed position and where the bottom exposed edge of the glazing is less than 60 inches above the walking surface. 7) Glazing in an individual fixed or operable panel, ,other than those locations described in items 5 and 6 above, than meets all of the following conditions: A. Exposed area of an individual pane greater than 9 square feet. B. Exposed bottom edge less than 18 inches above the floor. C. Exposed top edge greater than 36 inches above the floor. D. One or more walking surfaces within 36 inches horizontally of the plane of the glazing. 8) Glazing in railings regardless of height above a walking surface. Included are structural baluster panels and nonstructural in -fill panels. 9) Glazing in walls and fences used as the barrier for indoor and outdoor swimming pools and spas when the bottom edges is less than 60 inches above the pool,side and the glazing is within 5 feet of the pool or spa water's edge. 10) Glazing in walls enclosing stairway landings or within 5 feet -of then bottom and top of stairways where the bottom edge is less than 60 inches above the walking surface. 6 • Page # 10 Code review for: Project Id.: Glenwood Springs Fire House #3 Address: Four Mile Road, Glenwood Springs, CO ATTIC REQUIREMENTS: 1) Provide an access to all attic areas with a clear height of 30 inches or more. The minimum size is 22 inches by 30 inches. There must be 30 inches or more clear height above the access. -- Sec. 1505.1 2) Provide ventilation in all attic areas. The net free vent area is to be not less than 1 square foot for each 150 square feet of attic area. The vent area may be 1/300 if at least 50% of the required ventilating area is provided by ventilators located in the upper portion of the attic. The upper ventilators must be at least 3 feet above the eave or cornice vents. -- Sec. 1505.3, Exception 1 The vent area may be 1/300 provided a vapor retarder having a transmission rate not exceeding 1 perm is installed on the warm side of the attic insulation. -- Sec. 1505.3, Exception 2 3) Where eave or cornice vents are installed, insulation shall not block the fee flow of air. A minimum of 1 inch of air space shall be provided between the insulation and roof sheathing. Sec. 1505.3 THE FOLLOWING IMAGES ARE THE BEST COPY AVAILABLE AT TIME OF SCANNING a DRINKING FOUNTAINS 11 min 260 mm NOTE: Equipment permitted within dashed Tines if mounted below apron. (a) Spout Height and Leg Clearance E 0 co E E cQ ANSI 4.15 97 48 min 1220 mm (b) Clear Floor Space r. ! i GL;rtech I'a�l 1 1 Hepworth-Pawiak Geotechnical, Inc. 5020 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Phone: 970-945-7988 Fax: 970-945-8454 hpgeo @ hpgeotech.corn SUBSOIL STUDY FOR FOUNDATION DESIGN PROPOSED FIRE STATION #3 LOT 40, FOUR MILE RANCH COUNTY ROAD 117 GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO JOB NO. 102 431 JULY 22, 2002 PREPARED FOR: CITY OF GLENWOOD SPRINGS ATTN: MIKE PIPER 806 COOPER AVENUE GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO '81601 HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. July 22, 2002 City of Glenwood Springs Attn: Mike Piper 806 Cooper Avenue Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 . Job No. 102 431 Subject: Report Transmittal, Subsoil Study for Foundation Design, Proposed Fire Station #3, Lot 40, Four Mile Ranch, County Road 117, Garfield County, Colorado Dear Mr. Piper: As requested, we have conducted a subsoil study for design of foundations at the subject site. Subsurface conditions encountered in the exploratory borings drilled in the proposed building area consist of up to 3 to 4 feet of clay and gravel mixed fill overlying very stiff sandy clay to depths of 11 to 21 feet where dense gravel was encountered. Groundwater was not encountered in the borings and the subsoils were slightly moist. The proposed building can be founded on spread footings placed on the natural subsoils or compacted structural fill and designed for an allowable bearing pressure of 2,500 psf. Footings placed on the clay soils should also be designed for a minimum dead load pressure of 800 psf. The minimum dead load pressure can be avoided by placing at least 2 feet of structural fill below the bearing level. The report which follows describes our exploration, summarizes our findings, and presents our recommendations. It is important that we provide consultation during design, and field services during construction to review and monitor the implementation of the geotechnical recommendations. If you have any questions regarding this report, please contact us. Sincerely, HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. Steven L. Pawlak, P.E. Rev. By: JZA SLP/ksw TABLE OF CONTENTS PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY 1 PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION 1 SITE CONDITIONS 2 FIELD EXPLORATION 2 SUBSIDENCE POTENTIAL 3 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS FOUNDATION BEARING CONDITIONS 4 DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS 4 FOUNDATIONS 4 FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS 6 FLOOR SLABS 7 UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM 8 SITE GRADING 8 SURFACE DRAINAGE 9 PAVEMENT SECTION 9 LIMITATIONS 10 FIGURE 1 - LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIGURE 2 - LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIGURE 3 - LEGEND AND NOTES FIGURE 4 - SWELL -CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS TABLE 1 - SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS I -I -P GEOTECH F 4 x PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY This report presents the results of a subsoil study for the proposed Fire Station #3 to be located on Lot 40, Four Mile Ranch, County Road 117, Garfield County, Colorado. The project site is shown on Fig. 1. The purpose of the study was to develop recommendations for foundation design. The study was conducted in general accordance with our agreement for geotechnical engineering services to the City of Glenwood Springs, dated June 21, 2002. A fourthboring was added at the request of OZ Architects. A field exploration program consisting of exploratory borings was conducted to obtain information on the subsurface conditions. Samples of the subsoils obtained during the field exploration were tested in the laboratory to determine their classification, compressibility or swell and other engineering characteristics. The results of the field exploration and laboratory testing were analyzed to develop recommendations for foundation types, depths and allowable pressures for the proposed building foundation. This report summarizes the data obtained during this study and presents our conclusions, recommendations and other geotechnical engineering considerations based on the proposed construction and the subsoil conditions encountered. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION At the time of our study, design plans for the fire station were conceptual. The building is proposed in the middle to back part of the lot as shown on Fig. 1. The building will be a tall single story wood frame structure with 2 double bays for apparatus and an adjoining office/apartment. Grading for the building will require cut and fill to flatten the site and some retaining on the uphill side. For the purpose of our analysis, foundation loadings for the structure were assumed to be relatively light and carried mainly by continuous walls. The driveway and car parking will be asphalt paved and the truck parking apron will be concrete.. 1 -I -P GEOTECH If building loadings, location or grading plans are significantly different from those described above, we should be notified to re-evaluate the recommendations contained in this report. SITE CONDITIONS The lot was vacant at the time of our study. We understand that it had been used as a staging area during County Road 117 grading improvements located roughly between Lot 40 and Airport Road (County Road 116). The terrain is irregular across the lot with an overall moderate slope down to the northwest. The middle part of the lot has been benched by apparent shallow fill and some cut into the hillside. The uphill southeastern part of the lot appears natural. The emergency access road has been constructed by filling uphill along the northeast perimeter of the lot. Below the building area the ground drops down to a drainage swale and asphalt pedestrian path about 40 feet from County Road 117. Vegetation consists of sparce weeds throughout most of the lot with some sagebrush in the.eastern part and landscape grass and aspen trees along County Road 117. FIELD EXPLORATION The field exploratidn for the project was conducted on June 24 and 28, 2002. Four exploratory borings were drilled at the locations shown on Fig. 1 to evaluate the subsurface conditions. The borings were advanced with 4 inch diameter continuous flight auger powered by a Longyear BK-51HD drill rig. The borings were logged by a representative of Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. Samples of the subsoils were taken with 13/s inch and 2 inch I.D. spoon samplers. The samplers were driven into the subsoils at various depths with blows from a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches. This test is similar to the standard penetration test described by ASTM Method D-1586. The penetration resistance values are an indication of the relative density or consistency of the subsoils. Depths at which H -P GEOTECH 4 i s 3 the samples -were taken and the penetration resistance values are shown on the Logs of Exploratory Borings, Fig. 2. The samples were returned to our laboratory for review by the project engineer and testing. SUBSIDENCE POTENTIAL Bedrock of the Pennsylvanian age Eagle Valley Evaporite underlies the Four Mile Ranch Subdivision. These rocks area sequence of gypsiferous shale, fine-grained sandstone and siltstone with some massive beds of gypsum and limestone. There is a possibility that massive gypsum deposits associated with the Eagle Valley Evaporite underlie portions of the lot. Dissolution of the gypsum under certain conditions can cause sinkholes to develop and can produce areas of localized subsidence. Sinkholes were not observed on the subject lot or in the immediate area. No evidence of cavities was encountered in the subsurface materials; however, the exploratory borings were relatively shallow, for foundation design only. Based on our present knowledge of the subsurface conditions at the site, it cannot be said for certain that sinkholes will not develop. The risk of future ground subsidence on Lot 40 throughout the service life of the proposed structure, in our opinion, is low; however, the owner should be made aware of the potential for sinkhole development. If further investigation of possible cavities in the bedrock below the site is desired, we should be contacted. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Graphic logs of the subsurface profiles encountered at the site are shown on Fig. 2. Below about 1 to 4 feet of mixed clay and gravel fill, the subsoils consist of very stiff sandy clay to a depth of 11 to 21 feet where relatively dense, slightly silty to clayey, sandy gravel, cobbles and boulders was encountered. The clay soils are low to medium plasticity and relatively dry. No free water was encountered to the drilled depths of 16 to 28 feet. H -P GEOTECH 4 Laboratory testing performed on samples obtained during the field exploration included natural moisture content and density, finer than sand size gradation analyses and liquid and plastic limits. Swell -consolidation testing was performed on relatively undisturbed drive samples of the clay subsoils. The swell -consolidation test results, presented on Fig. 4, indicate low compressibility under relatively light surcharge loading and a low expansion potential when wetted under a constant light surcharge. The laboratory testing is summarized in Table I. FOUNDATION BEARING CONDITIONS The subsoils encountered below the fill consist of very stiff clay that possesses a low expansion potential when wetted. The expansion potential can probably be mitigated by load concentration to reduce or prevent swelling in the event of wetting below the foundation bearing level. Surface runoff, landscape irrigation, and utility leakage are possible sources of water which could cause wetting. Structural fill will be needed to develop the building pad area. Subexcavation of the expansive clay and replacement with compacted structural fill below footing bearing level can also be used to help mitigate the expansion potential. DESIGN RECOIVIIENDATIONS FOUNDATIONS Considering the subsurface conditions encountered in the exploratory borings and the nature of the proposed construction, we recommend the building be founded with spread footings placed on the natural subsoils or on compacted structural fill. The design and construction criteria presented below should be observed for a spread footing foundation system. 1) Footings placed on the natural subsoils or on compacted structural fill can be designed for an allowable bearing pressure of 2,500 psf. Footings placed on the clay soils should also be designed for a minimum dead load H -P GEOTECH pressure of 800 psf. In order to satisfy the minimum dead load pressure under lightly loaded areas, it may be necessary to concentrate loads by using void form. Wall -on -grade construction is not recommended at this site to achieve the minimum dead load. The minimum dead load pressure can be avoided by providing at least 2 feet of compacted structural fill below footing bearing level. 2) Based on experience, we expect initial settlement of footings designed and constructed as discussed 'in this Section will be up to about 1 inch. There could be additional movement of about 1 inch if the bearing soils were to become wet. 3) The footings should have a minimum width of 16 inches for continuous footings and 24 inches for isolated pads. 4) Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span local anomalies and limit the risk of differential movement. One method of analysis is to design the foundation walls to span an unsupported length of at least 12 feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining structures should also be designed to resist a lateral earth pressure as discussed in the "Foundation and Retaining Walls" section of this report. 5) Exterior footings and footings beneath unheated areas should be provided with adequate soil cover above their bearing elevation for frost protection. Placement of foundations at least 36 inches below the exterior grade is typically used in this area. 6) Prior to the footing construction, the existing fill, any topsoil and loose or disturbed soils should be removed to expose the natural subsoils. Structural fill should be provided to at least 2 feet below bearing level and 1 foot beyond the edge of footings. The structural fill should consist of a relatively well graded granular soil, such as road base, and be compacted to at least 100 % of standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. H -P GEOTECH -6 7) A representative of the geotechnical engineer should observe all footing excavations prior to concrete placement to evaluate bearing conditions. FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS Foundation walls and retaining structures which are laterally supported and can be expected to undergo only a slight amount of deflection should be designed for a lateral earth pressure computed on the basis of an equivalent fluid unit weight of 55 pcf for backfill consisting of the on-site soils. Cantilevered retaining structures, such as the uphill retaining wall, which can be expected to deflect sufficiently to mobilize the full active earth pressure condition should be designed for a lateral earth pressure computed on the basis of an equivalent fluid unit weight of 45 pcf for backfill consisting of the on- site soils. All foundation and retaining structures should be designed for appropriate hydrostatic and surcharge pressures such as adjacent footings, traffic, construction materials and equipment. The pressures recommended above assume drained conditions behind the walls and a horizontal backfill surface. The buildup of water behind a wall or an upward sloping backfill surface will increase the lateral pressure imposed on a foundation wall or retaining structure. An underdrain should be provided to prevent hydrostatic pressure buildup behind retaining walls. Backfill should be placed in uniform lifts and compacted to at least 90 % of the maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Backfill in pavement areas should be compacted to at least 95 % of the maximum standard Proctor density. Care should be taken not to overcompact the backfill or use large equipment near the wall since this could cause excessive lateral pressure on the wall. We recommend predominantly granular soils for backfilling retaining structures because their use results in lower lateral earth pressures and the backfill will improve the subsurface drainage. Granular wall backfill should contain less than 25 % passing the No. 200 sieve and have a maximum size of 6 inches. The finer grained on-site soil or pavement should be provided to help prevent surface water infiltration into the backfill. H -P GEOTECR n 7 The lateral resistance of foundation or retaining wall footings will be a combination of the sliding resistance of the footing on the foundation materials and passive earth pressure against the side of the footing. Resistance to sliding at the bottoms of the footings can be calculated based on a coefficient of friction of 0.3 for the clay and 0.45 for granular fill. Passive pressure of compacted backfill against the sides of the footings can be calculated using an equivalent fluid unit weight of 300 pcf . The coefficient of friction and passive pressure values recommended above assume ultimate soil strength. Suitable factors of safety should be included in the design to limit the strain which will occur at the ultimate strength, particularly in the case of passive resistance. Fill placed against the sides of the footings to resist lateral loads should be compacted to at least 95 % of the maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. FLOOR SLABS The natural clay soils possess an expansion potential and there could be some slab heave if the subgrade soils were to become wet. Slab -on -grade construction may be used provided precautions are taken to limit potential movement and the risk of distress to the building is accepted by the owner. The risk of slab movement, can be reduced by placing at least 3 feet of relatively well graded granular material, such as road base, below the floor slab. To reduce the effects of some differential movement, nonstructural floor slabs should be separated from all bearing walls and columns with expansion joints which allow unrestrained vertical movement. Floor slab control joints should be used to reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking. Slab reinforcement and control joints should be established by the designer based on experience and the intended slab use. Required fill beneath slabs can consist of the on-site gravelly fill soils or imported relatively well graded granular material, excluding topsoil and oversized rocks. The fill should be spread in thin horizontal lifts, adjusted to near optimum moisture content, and compacted to at least 95 % of the maximum standard Proctor H -P GEOTECH • • 8 density. All vegetation, the existing fill, any topsoil and loose or disturbed soil should be removed prior to fill placement. The above recommendations will not prevent slab heave if the expansive soils underlying slabs -on -grade become wet. However, the recommendations will reduce the effects if slab heave occurs. All plumbing lines should be pressure tested before backfilling to help reduce the potential for wetting. UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM Although groundwater was not encountered during our exploration, it has been our experience in the area and where clay soils are present that local perched groundwater can develop during times of heavy precipitation or seasonal runoff. Frozen ground during spring runoff can create a perched condition. Therefore, we recommend below -grade construction and retaining walls be protected by an underdrain system. The underdrain system should consist of a drainpipe surrounded by free -draining granular material placed at the bottom of the wall backfill. The drain lines should be placed at each level of excavation and at least 1 foot below lowest adjacent finish grade, and sloped at a minimum 1% grade to a suitable gravity outlet. Free -draining granular material used in the drain system should consist of minus 2 inch aggregate with less than 50 % passing the No. 4 sieve and less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve. The drain gravel should be at least 112 feet deep. Gravel packed weep holes could also be used behind concrete retaining walls. SITE GRADING Embankment fills should be compacted to at least 95 % of the maximum standard Proctor density near optimum moisture content. Prior to fill placement, the subgrade should be carefully prepared by removing all existing fill, vegetation and topsoil and compacting to 95 % standard Proctor density near optimum moisture content. The fill should be benched into the portions of the hillside exceeding 20 % H -P GEOTECH 9 grade. Permanent unretained cut and fill slopes should be graded at 2 horizontal to 1 vertical or flatter and protected against erosion by revegetation or other means. SURFACE DRAINAGE The following drainage precautions should be observed during construction and maintained at_all times after the building has been completed: 1) Excessive wetting or drying of the foundation excavations and underslab- areas should be avoided during construction. 2) Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and compacted to at least 95 % of the maximum standard Proctor density in pavement areas and to at least 90 % of the maximum standard Proctor density in landscape areas. 3) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions. We recommend a minimum slope of 6 inches in the first 10 feet in unpaved areas and a minimum slope of 3 inches in the first 10 feet in paved areas. 4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill. 5) Landscaping which requires regular heavy irrigation, such as sod, should be located at least 5 feet from foundation walls. Consideration should be given to use of xeriscape fo reduce the potential for wetting of soils below the foundation caused by irrigation. PAVEMENT SECTION The native subgrade material on the lot consists of low to medium plastic sandy clay which is considered a relatively poor material for pavement support. We understand that pavement section consisting of 6 inches of asphalt (full depth) in driveway areas and 6 inches of portland cement concrete for the building floor and apparatus parking apron slabs have been assumed in the design. H -P GEOTECH -10- 4 . L The clay subgrade is estimated to have a Hveem stabilometer `R' value of 10 based on the soil type and classification test results. For this value, the 6 inch asphalt section will support an 18 kip equivalent daily load application of 15 which should be adequate. An equivalent composite section could consist of 4 inches of asphalt on 6 inches of CDOT Class 6 aggregate base course. The 6 inch portland cement apron slab should be underlain with 4 inches of CDOT Class 6 aggregate base course. The asphalt, concrete and base materials should be constructed according to the project specifications. Adequate surface diainage'should be provided to prevent ponding of water within or adjacent to pavement areas. LIMLTATIONS This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no warranty either expressed or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the exploratory borings drilled at the locations indicated on Fig. 1, the proposed type of construction and our experience in the area. Our findings include interpolation and extrapolation of the subsurface conditions identified at the exploratory borings and variations in the subsurface conditions may not become evident until excavation is performed. If conditions encountered during construction appear to be different from those described in this report, we should be notified at once so re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes. We are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. As the project evolves, we should provide continued consultation and field services during construction to review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations, and to verify that the recommendations have been appropriately interpreted. Significant design changes may require additional analysis or modifications of the recommendations presented herein. We recommend on-site observation of H -P GEOTECH s -11- excavations and foundation bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a representative of the geotechnical engineer. Sincerely, HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. Steven L. Pawlak, P. Reviewed by: 4 Gas e • 16222 ,w* o„7/z y/0- ''F //rs�. L cc: OZ Architecture - Attn: Yael Nyholm c/o City of Glenwood Springs H -P GEOTECH 1 1 1 PROPERTY BOUNDARY BORING 3 • BUILDING ENVELOPE COUNTY ROAD 117 (FOUR MILE ROAD) PEDESTRIAN TRAIL BENCH MARK: SEWER MANHOLE RIM; ELEV. = 100.0', ASSUMED. BORING 4 • PROPOSED DRIVEWAY/ PARKING i 7 7 7 i �G" ,\'°'4' G� APPROXIMATE SCALE 1:-= 50' 102 431 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS Fig. 1 m L c 30 > 1 — 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 102 431 BORING 1 BORING 2 ELEV.= 106.8' ELEV.= 104.6' 30/12 WC=8.6 00=109 28/12 24/12 WC=5.1 00=103 -200=57 30/6 10/0 17/12 WC=7.6 00=101 -200=85 LL=28 P1=13 17/12 WC=8.6 00=103 34/12 BORING 3 BORING 4 ELEV.= 107.6' ELEV.= 103.2' 10/0 24/12 WC=11.2 00=106 -200=92 LL=41 PI=22 18/12 21/12 22/12 13/6,23/1 Note: Explanation of symbols is shown on Fig. 3. HEPWORTH—PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. 10/a 19/12 WC=6.6 00=101 -200=88 24/12 29/12 LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 Fig. 2 Elevation — Feet 'LEGEND: 1 .p 30/12 NOTES: FILL; mixed sandy clay and gravel with cobbles and slightly moist, mixed brown. CLAY (CL); silty, slightly sandy to sandy, scattered porous and calcareous, low to medium plasticity. BASALT GRAVEL, COBBLES AND BOULDERS (SC—GC); subangular to subrounded rock. small boulders, asphalt debris at surface, gravel, very stiff, slightly moist, brown, slightly clayey, sandy, dense, slightly moist, brown, GRAVEL, COBBLES AND BOULDERS (GM—GP); silty, dense, slightly moist, grey, rounded rock. Relatively undisturbed drive sample; 2—inch I.D. California liner sample. Drive sample; standard penetration test (SPT), 1 3/8 inch I.D. split spoon sample, ASTM 0-1586. Drive sample blow count; indicates that 30 blows of a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches were required to drive the California or SPT sampler 12 inches. Pratical rig refusal. 1. Exploratory Borings 1 — 3 were drilled on June 24 and Boring 4 was drilled on June 28, 2002 with a 4—inch diameter continous flight power auger. 2. Locations of exploratory borings were measured approximately by pacing from features shown on the site plan provided. 3. Elevations of exploratory borings were measured by instrument level and refer to the Bench Mark shown on Fig. 1. 4. The exploratory boring locations and elevations should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. 5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory boring logs represent the approximate boundaries between material types and transitions may be gradual. 6. No free water was encountered in the borings at the time of drilling or when checked on June 28, 2002. Fluctuation in water level may occur with time. 7. Laboratory Testing Results: WC = Water Co,ptent ( % ) DD = Dry Density ( pcf ) —200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve. LL = Liquid Limit ( % ) PI = Plasticity Index ( % ) 102 431 HEPWORTH—PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. LEGEND AND NOTES Fig. 3 Compression -- Expansion Compression -- Expansion % 2 1 •0 1 2 1 0 1 2 3 i Moisture Content -= 8.6 percent Dry Density = 109 pcf Sample of: Sandy Clay From: Boring 1 et 2 Feet Expansion upon wetting 0.1 1.0 10 APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf 100 Moisture Content = 8.6 percent Dry Density = 103 pcf Sample of: Sandy Clay From: Boring 2 at 10 Feet 0 - Expansion Expansion upon wetting 0.1 1.0 10 APPUED PRESSURE -- ksf 102 431 HEPWORTH—PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS 100 Fig. 4 0 z m 0 3 w C3 z N —J -J a 11 Ci 0 Ili 1 ins I— 0 >- LL1 _ 0 0 iii 1--' -1 at Q a J~is c LL a 0 H cc cc a 0 n p„ cn LU = X SOIL OR BEDROCK TYPE co U A 73 C CO, GO very sandy clay 41 m (J > 'Cf c (0 V)co sandy clay II slightly sandy clay it cru 0 > b c co _ UNCONI INED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH IPSP) ATTERBERG LIMITS PLASTIC INDEX IVO Ci, N L. d d 2 N yo r V t• PERCENT PASSING NO. 200 SIEVE N LO 85 1 , 0 r 88 z av 1 c� O z' y GRAVEL i%I NATURAL DRY DENSITY ipc» CO 0 Cr) 0. r 0 C ) 0 (0 0 �- 0 � ti ga 1(CI Q a Q z v ao r ori (fl i. (Q ao �; (0 SAMPLE LOCATION 1 BORING r N Cr) d" SHAW CONSTRUCTION CO. LLC .,-,A60 Horizon Drive Phone: 970-242-9236 Grand Junction, CO 81506 Fax: 970-241-5618 TRANSMITTAL No. 00079 PROJECT: Glenwood Fire Station #3 TO: Garfield County 108 8th Street, Suite 108 DATE: 10/15/2002 RECrIVEF: OCT 1 6 2002 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING & PLANNING ATTN: Andy Schwaller Glenwood Springs Fire Station #3 WE=ARE SENDING: :SUBMITTED FOR; ACTrON TAKEN ❑ Shop Drawings 0 Approval 0 Approved as Submitted g Letter ✓❑I Your Use 0 Approved as Noted ❑ Prints 0 As Requested 0 Returned After Loan ❑ Change Order ❑ Review and Comment 0 Resubmit ❑ Plans 0 Submit 0 Samples SENT VIA: ' 0 Retumed ❑ Specifications g Attached 0 Returned for Corrections ❑ Other:. 0 Separate Cover Via: ❑ Due Date: ITEM NO, COPIES DATE ITEM NUMBER REV, NO, ntSCRIPTION Remarks: 1 101151200: 4.1 7° etea4 Rr.„(1,0,0,1tcs j ti CC: Copy for Pat Seydel, City of Glenwood Springs Expedition Plan Review Notice Response Letter e'J .J"11114- 61,1 - STATUS Signed: Eric C. Marquez LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL 01 ARCHITECTURE' 325 Lake Dillon Drive, Suite 102 P.O. Box 4825 Dillon, Colorado 80435 phone 970.513.7151 fax 970.513.7180 To; Andy Schwaller Date: October 14, 2002 Garfield County 108 8th St, Suite 303 Glenwood Springs, Co 81601 (970) 945-8212 From: Joe Ward Project: Glenwood Springs Fire Station #3 Subject: Plan Review Notice Response Project#: 32006 CC: Dan Grisham, Shaw Construction Pat Seydel, City of Glenwood Springs File #: File We transmit herewith Via: Hand Delivery For your ❑ Approval ❑ Information ❑ As requested ❑ Correction ❑ Review/Comments ❑ Sce below Copies Document # Date Description 1 OZ Architecture Plan Review Notice Response Letter Remarks: Documentl DENVER BOULDER SUMMIT COUNT Y OZ ARCHITECTURE October 11, 2002 Andy Schwaller Building Official Building and Planning Department 109 8th Street, Suite 303 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Reference: Permit for Glenwood Springs Fire House #3 Dear Andy: Response to Plan Review notice dated: 10/7/2002. We have reviewed your plan review letter, and appreciate your response. We have prepared responses to each of the items that you included in your letter to us. Your comments are included in italics for reference. If these responses meet with your approval, OZ Architecture will prepare and issue to the General Contractor formal A.I.A. change documentation (Addendum, Architect's Supplemental Instructions and/or Proposal 1 Request) to formally change the contract scope to address each item. Building and code Info plans indicated project is built to the 1994 UBC. Project should reflect the 1997 UBC. Please verify or amend the plans to the 1997 UBC with architect. (Sheet T1.1). There are no modifications needed to comply with 1997 UBC. We will change reference to the governing code on the coversheer. 2. A Driveway Permit was not included in the application. Please contact the Garfield County Road and Bridge at 945-1223 regarding this permit. Shaw construction will be addressing this directly with the County. I,.14, 3. The lavatory is indicated to be within the water closet clear space as per ANSI A117.1. See attached. (Room 105; Sheet A2.1). See attached sketch SK -1 for revision to this room. 6.14. 4. Include a copy of the soils report for the site to be built on. A copy of the soils report for this sire, prepared by HP Geotech is attached, dated July 22, 2002. 5. Support of mechanical above room is not clear. If suspendedfi.orn trusses, provide letter from truss engineer 0,14 . showing detail. Otherwise pleaseclarify. (Room 104; A3.1). Mechanical unit to sit on a platform. See attached roof revision sketch, SKS-1. 6. Please indicate weld size (S4; Section 13). 325 Lake Dillon Drive, Suite 102 P.O. Box 4825 Dillon, Colorado 80€35 phone 970.513.71551 fax 970.513.7180 G:132006 Glenwood Springs FS\Correspondence\l.etrerlBldgDeptExtrer101102.doc 11 E H Y E S • B 0 11 1 R t R S 11 MM 1 ! COOPIT Y Weld size to be 'A". See revision to section 13154 on SKS-2, attached. 7. Please indicate the stud spacing for this shear wall. (53; Section 10/54). Stud spacing to be 2x6 wd studs at 1'4" on center. See revision to sectionl0/S4 on SKS-3, attached. 8. The structural design for the retaining wall is not shown. It may be section 8 — page 51. Please clarify. Retaining wall is MSE site block Keystone or similar to be design -build. We hope that this clears up all of your concerns regarding the Glenwood Springs Fire Station 43 and that this will allow the Building Permit to be issued. If you have further concerns or we have not provided an adequate response please contact Joseph Ward or Yael Nyholm at OZ Architecture (970.513.7151) as soon as you can. Sincerely, OZ Architecture 4cr/• `r Joseph Ward Attachments: Cc: SK -1, dated 10/10/02 SKS1, 2 & 3, dated 10/10/02 Soils Report, prepared by HP Geotech, dated July 22, 2002 (County copy only) Dan Grisham, Shaw Construction Par Seydel, City of Glenwood Springs 1019102 page 2 of 2 CONTRACTOR'S MATERIAL & TEST CERTIFICATE FOR A3OVEGROUND PIPING Additional copies of Mit form rare Publications -Order Processing, Training Resource Center. available only Io insureds from: Factory Mutual Engineering 8 Research, 1151 Boston -Providence Turnpike. P,O. Box 9102. Norwood FAA 02062 PROCEDURE Upon completion of work, inspection and tests shall be made by the contractor's representative and witnessed by an owner's representative, An defects shall be corrected and System tett in service before contractors personnel finally leave the job. A certificate shall be filled out and signed by both reprasentafives. Copies shall be prepared for approving authorities, owners and contractor, It is understood the owner's representative's signature in no way prejudices any claim against c3ntractor for faulty material, poor workmanship, or failure to comply with approving authority's requirements or local ordinances. PLANS ADDRESS INSTALLATION CONFORMS TO ACCEPTED PLANS EOUrPMENT USED IS APPROVED IF NO, EXPLAIN DEVIATIONS OATE 4//o/o,3 INSTRUCTIONS HAS PERSON IN CHARGE OF FIRE EOUIPMENT BEEN INSTRUCTED AS TO LOCATION OF CONTROL VALVES AND CARE AND MAINTENANCE OF THIS NEW EQUIPMENT? W NO. EXPLAIN OYES RIYES -LINO YES LINO LOCATION OF SYSTEM SPRINKLERS HAVE COPIES OF APPROPRIATE INSTRUCTIQNs AND CARE AND MAINTENANCE CHARTS ANO NFPA 13A BEEN LEFT ON PREMrSES7 IF NO, EXPLAIN OYES xU N J o k t ta.A SUPPLIES B7,OOS PIPE AND FITTINGS PIPE CONFORMS TO 4--7,,,PY9 %.j STANDARD FITTINGS CONFORM TO _'u / rit (3 STANDARD IF NO, EXPLAIN ALARM VALVE OR FLOW INDICATOR ALARM DEVICE TYPE MAKE MODEL tick,) ( Pe/7r WYES SONO lONO NO MAXIMUM TIME TO OPERATE THROUGH TEST PIPE MIN. SEC: vs DRY PIPE OPERATING TEST DRY VALVE MAKE MODEL SERIAL NO. MAKE O.O O. 9. MOREL searAL NO TIME TO TRIP THRU TEST PIPE MIN. SEC WATER PRESSURE PSI AIR: PRESSURE P51 TRIP POINT AIR PRESSURE PSI TIME WATER REACHED TEST OUTLET h1w. SEC. ALARM OPERATED PROPERLY YES NO WITHOUT 0,0.0. WITH 0O.D. rF NO. EXPLAIN DELUGE & PREACTION VALVES TEST DESCRIPTION 4 ti OPERATION PIPING SUPERVISED °PNEEUMAT1C ❑€LECTfilCHYDRAULIC OYES NO GETECTiNG 'AMA SUPERVISED 0088 VALVE OPERATE FROM THE WHtJAL TRO? ANwoft REmoTE CONTROL STATION57 tS THERE AN ACCESSIELE FACNJTY IN MR CiRCIAT FOR TESTING? ❑YES ONO IF NO. FXPtAIN 11 MAKE TESTS OLANI( TESTING GASKET$ MODEL • °ofS £tri OnCUIT OPERATE SUPEnviSIOrr 1055 ALARu YES N45_ YES NO OYES NO DUES EACr1 CrRCtrrr I VAxiuuu TIU Tp OPERATE VALVE PELEA°SE 1 ovcRATE rlEtEA"f YES NO 1 YES sro HYDROSTATIC' Hydrostatic toss shall be made at not less Than 200 per (t35 bars) for Iwo hours or 50 psi (3 4 bars) above 51a11C pressure in excess of 150 psi (10,2 bars) for twit hours Differential dry°pipe valve clappers shall be /eh open during lest Ip proven! damage. An aboveground piping leakage shalt be stopped. FLUSHING: Flow the required rate until water is dear as indicated by no soNection a1 foreign matenai in burlap bags al outlets such as hydranis and brow -offs. Flush at bows not fess than 400 GPM (1514 Limon) Lor 4 -inch pipe, 600 GPM (2271 IJmin) for 5°inch pipe, 750 GPM (2839 Amin) for 6 -inch pipe 1000 GPM (3785 Untin) for 8 -inch pipe. 1500 GPM (557(1 Umrn) for I0.. nr;h pipe and 2000 GPM (7570 Urntn} for 12 -inch pipe- When supply cannot produce stipulated claw rates. obtain maximum ava labte. PNEUMATIC: Establish 40 psi (2.7 bars) air pressure and measure drop which shall not exceed 1.1)2 psi (0,1 bars) in 24 hours Test (1e38ur0 tanks at normal water level and air pressure and measure air pressure drop which shall not exceed 1-112 psi (0.1 bars) in 24 hours ALL PIPING HYDROSTATICALLY TESTED AT PSIFOR ..Z HRS. IF NO, STATE REASON DYES. FitNo BYES ONO DRY PIPING PNEUMATICALLY TESTED EQUIPMENT OPERATES PROPERLY DRAIN TEST yuity REALI NG OF GAGE LOCATED NEAR WATER SUPPLY TEST PIPE RESIDUAL PRESSURE WITH VALVE 1rt TEST Pia E OPEN vnD£ STATIC PRESSURE (fi psi ,.s . psi Underground mains and teed -fit connections to system risers shall be Rushed before connection made to sprinkler piping. VERIFIED BY COPY OF THE FORM NO, 858 LYES ONO OTHER EXPLAIN FLUSHED BY INSTALLER OF UNDERGROUND SPRINKLER PIPING ®YES ONO NUMBER USED LOCATIONS MELDING WELDED PIPING YES ONO ( NUMBER REMOVED IF YES .. . DO i'0U CERTfFY AS THE SPRINHLER CONTRACTOR THAT WELDING PROCEDURES COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF AT LEAST AWS 010.9. LEVEL AR•?, DO YOU CERTIFY THAT THE WELDING WAS PERFORMED BY WELDERS OUALIFIED 1N COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF AT LEAST AWS D10.9. LEVEL AR -3? -YES ENO YES ❑ NO 00 YOU CERTIFY THAT WELDING WAS CARRIED OUT IN COMPLIANCE WITH A DOCUMENTED QUALITY LYES NO CONTROL. PROCEDURE TO INSURE THAT ALL DISCS ARE RETRIEVED. THAT OPENINGS IN PIPING ARE SMOOTH, THAT SLAG AND OTHER WELDING RESIDUE ARE REMOVED, AND THAT THE -INTERNAL DIAMETERS OF PIPING ARE NOT PENETRATED? (HYDRAULIC DATA NAMEPLATE NAMEPLATE PROVIDED IW NO. ExPLAJN REMARKS Q�YES 0140 DATE LEFT 714 SERVICE WITH ALL CONTROL VALVES OPEN: 4 !1©/03 SIGNATURES NAME OF SPRINALEr1 CONTAACTQR FOR PROPERTY OWNER (SIGNE)) FOR SPRINKLER CONTRACTOR (SIGNED) ADDITIONAL, EXPLANATION AND NOTE TESTS WITNESSED BY TITLE DATE TITLE DATE to ;;2, 4 ccO crtct-f rr�-�l > 6 66 1A BACK '13/2002 04:23 F253527 ...i fkl i,4. I k ROAD FIND BR?DGE Garfield County Road and Bridge Department 902 Taugheibaugh Blvd., Ste SO Rifle, CO 81680 Phone -(970)625-8601 Fax- (970)625- 627 Invoice Invoke Date: WM/2002 Invoice N 51 Bill To: Dan Grisham Lot 40, 4 -mile ranch ,ca Driveway Permit Number. 51 $15.011 per Driveway Permit. Driveway Permit Fee: oM Due; Thank You! 67/ \9\ $'15.00 $15.00 i ,tZLOULGOSLA. 614,A ti-ftectib /42/ f6f/ ,4 g-,),3 03 PAGE 02 .t, I SPECT1ON W LL NOT BE MADE UNLESS THS CARD IS POSTED DN THE JOB 24 HOURS NOTICE REQUIRED FOR INSPECTIONS Date Issue BUILDING PERMIT GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO Zoned Area Permit No. 7 AGREEMENT In consideration of the issuance of this permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with all laws and regulations related to the zoning, location; construction and erection of the proposed structure for which this permit is granted, and further agrees that if the above said regulations are not fully complied with in the zoning, location, erection and construction of the above described structure, the permit may then be revoked by notice from the County Building Inspector and DIME 1 IATELY BECOME NULL AND VOID. Use 0 Addres r Legal Des ' ktion Ovvite045 ."411441 Setbacks Front Side Side Rear This Card Must Be Posted So It is Plainly Visible From The Street Until Final Inspection. INSPECTION RECORD Footing 4)-1 5--0-2_, c4rN, Foundation (1-19 -- p , AS. 4 2,, 10 0 ,;t.. 4417. , Underground Plumbing I2 - ,- 02. ioAM Insulation zA_ o . Rough Plumbing .n_o , v.4. --Drywall ,2,--'L6 -09 Chimney & Vent IF. g,.3_ Electric Final (by State Inspector) ,,;,, it ,,,'Pi. Gas Piping - _o,3 Final it' -o Electric Rough (By State Inspector)1'14 4"� Septic Final N idr_. Framing / /,--0 3$4-4 (To include Roof in place and Windows and Doors installed). 'fir Notes: ALL LISTED ITEMS MUST BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE COVERING WHETHER INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR, UNDERGROUND OR ABOVE GROUND. THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE Phone 384-5003 109 8th Street County Courthouse Glenwood Springs, Colorado. APPROVEDDO NOT DESTROY THIS CARD Dat y IF PLACED OUTS E - COVER WITH CLEAR PLASTIC