Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplicationGARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION GARFIELD COUNTY (GLENWOOD SPRINGS), COLORADO . INSPECTION LINE: (970)3 84--5043 PERMIT NO. 7 - t PARCEL/SCHEDULE NO.6P72- //) `"03 7476 'ELEPHONE: (970) 945-8212 JOB ADDRESS: 1 LOT NO. BLOCK NO. SUBDIVISION/EXEMPTION 2 .f F O g ', T�c.0), wth � ADDRESS ( , R L3` 1_.� _ / Pn�yoc •M)LPm. • s CONIRACTOI 9/i- CurCiceA //6t, S 1i9.. �' y126 4 ARCEEFECrl13R $y� l r 6-.14,0/ Qf � 7-. 5 err OPDVfl ua �1'- j .e uT(SLOT e,6 NIX OEMOORS 6 175Evsnvnnwa a Iy_i = iU ._ zi e- k 'Lr C. / I -s- ...(1A0 a"/"" Z_ ii-A,u-iiAgo a./..,./J .--ke / 7 8 am* OVROM: ) °ADOrrBON eALTENIT)Oti MIME =MOVE 9 GARAGE. = CARPORT: QVC• �ADUE�$ e 10 }WOO= /� % o aDINBMAYPATt:ar Pik P/j�/r'�Y uONORR118RAC6DgPorAL (!R]1) 0.1NEPLN , I/ L f� VAWATION06WORE: $ AU7[IRIEDVAWAlIcen • REVAL CCENDMONR: Cf:) - 09 . 724)114-e"el-ren91 r.,2/41(0 /I l4:: , Op 441 42-'14. -- - - - 3 NOTICE it , A SEPARATE ELECTRICAL PERMIT IS REQUIRED AND MUST BE ISSUED By THE; SPATS OF 'COLORADO. PLAN CHECK FEE: i ` PERMITFEE: THIS PERMIT' BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 110 DAYS, OR IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED DOR APERIOD OF 110 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. ' TOTAL FEE: DATE PERMIT ISSUED:' I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION AND KNOW TIIB SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS - GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. TILE GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OK OCC: GROUP: - CONST: TYPE: SV L. y J V LOCAL LAW REGULATING CONSTRUCTION OR THE PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTIO • , ;ja ZONING: SETBACKS: ' 't S.".� or authorized agent _ , and , , native above r, © / L'i fra ,---. IANU.110ME:isnot — BuBdmg 3..Approve/Mete r,/1 ' Inning Dept. •..•- I, °" AGREEMENT PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO THE APPLICANT AS OWNER, CONTRACTOR AND/ORTJIE AGENT OF THE CONTRACTOR OR OWNER TO CT THE DETAILED ON PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SUBMITTED TO AND REVIEWED BY THE BUIIAINGDEPARTMENT. IN CONSIDERATION OF THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERIv IT, THE SIGNER. HEREBY AGREES TO COMPLY WITH AIL BUILDING CODES AND LAND USE REGULATIONS ADOPTED BY GARFIELD COUNTY PURSUANT TOAUTHORITY GIVEN IN 30.21.201 CRS AS AMENDED: THE SIGNER. FURTHERAGREES THAT IF THE ABOVE SAID ORDINANCES ARE NOT FULLY COMPLIED WITEI IN THE LOCATION, ERECTION, CONSTRUCTION AND USE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED STRUCCEURE, THE PERMIT MAY THEN BE REVOKED BY NOTICE FROM THE COUNTY AND THAT THEN AND THERE TT SHALL BECOME MEL AND VOID. THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT BASED UPON PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OMER DATA SHALL NOT PREVENT THE BUII.DING OFFICIAL FROM THEREAFTER REQUIRING THE CORRECTION OF ERRORS IN SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA OR FRO PREVENTING BUILDING OPERATION BEING CARRIED ON THEREUNDER WHEN IN VIOLATION OF TIES CODE OR ANY OTHER ORDINANCE OR REGULATION OF TIES IURISDICTION. THE REVIEW OF THE SUBMITTED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND INSPECTIONS CONDUCTED THEREAFTER DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ACCEPTANCE OF ANY - RESPONSiBILITIES OK LIABILITIES BY GARFIELD COUNTY FOR ERRORS, OMISSIONS OR DISCREPANCIES. THE RESPONSIBILITY Y FOR THESE ITEMS AND IMPLEMMTATioN DURING CONSTRUCIIONRESTS SPECIFICALLY WITH THE ARCHITECT, DESIGNER, BUIC.DEKAND OWNER. COMMENTS ARE INTENDED TO BE CONSERVATIVE AND IN SUPPORT OF THE OWNERS INTEREST. Goafatm.uo3 I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE MAT I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE AUNT ABOVE, aNn TATA Plans tc13e included for a Building Permit must be on draft paper at least 18"x 24"" and drawn to scale. Mai s must include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations all sides with decks, balcony steps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the finish grade line. A section showing in detail, from the bottom of the footing to the top of the roof, including re -bar, anchor bolts, pressure treated plates, floor joists, wall studs and spacing, insulation, sheeting, house -rap, (which is required), siding or any approved building material. A window schedule. A door schedule. A floor framing plan, a roofing framing plan, roof must be designed to withstand a 40 pound per square foot. up to 7,000 feet in elevation, an 80 M.P.H. windshear, wind exposure B, windload of 15 pounds per square foot and a 36 inch frost depth. All sheets to be identified by number and indexed. All of the above requirements must be met or your plans will be returned. All plans submitted must be incompliance with the 1997 UBC, UMC and 1997 UPC. Applicants are required to indicate appropriately and to submit completed checklist at time of application for a permit: 1. Is a site plan included that identifies the location of the proposed structure, additions or other buildings, set ack easements, and utility easements showing distances to the property lines m each corner of the proposed structure prepared by a licensed surveyor and has theeyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing? Slopes of 40% or more onpfoperties must be show on site plan. Yes 2. Does the site plan when applicable i l de4tie location oft .S.D.S.. (Individual Sewage Disposal System) and distances to the property lines, wells (on subject property and adjacent properties), streams or water courses? This information must be certified by a licensed surveyor with their signature and professional stamp on the design. Yes No Not necessary for this project 3. Are the plans submitted for application construction drawings and not drawings that are stamped or marke . idifying them as "Not for construction, for permit issuance only", "Approval dr. r gs only", "For permit issuance only" or similar language? Yes __ No Not necessary for this project 2 4! Isithe I.S.D.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System) designed, stamped and signed by a Colorado Registered Enginee . Yes No of necessary for this project 5. Does the sit- .. indicate the location and direction of the State, County or private road access i : he property? Yes 6. Do the plans include a founda 'edit plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all reinforcing steel in accord - ce with the uniform building code or per stamped engineered design? Yes No Not necessary for this project 7. If the building is a pre -en e ed structure, is there a stamped, signed engineered foundation plan forg? Yes No Not necessary for this project 8. Do the plans indicate theon and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl spaces and the clear s required between wood and earth? Yes No Not necessary for project 9. Do the plans indicate the s - . d location of the ventilation openings for the attic, roof joist spaces - • offits? Yes No Not necessary for this project 10. Do the plans include desig Bads as required under the Uniform. Building Code for roof snowloads, (a minim f 40 pounds per square foot in Garfield County)? Yes No Not necessary for this project 11. Do the plans include desig pads as required for floor loads under the Uniform Building Code Chapter 16 andyfftiles 16A, 16B and 16C? Yes No r Not necessary for this project 12. Does the plan include a b ding section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor, and roof construction? Yes No N ssary for this project 13. Is the wind speed ande posure design included in the plan? Yes No Not necessary for this project 14. Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists, wall studs, ceiling joists, roof rafters or joists or trusses? �r= Yes No / Not necessary for this project 15. Does the building sectio connection of all col Yes No awing or other detail include the method of positive and beams? Not necessary for this project 16. Does the plan indicate the he • ht of the building or proposed addition from the highest point of the building or a, • tion measured at mid span between the ridge and the eave down to existing gra Yes No ontours? Not necessary for this project 17. Does the plan include any stove or zero clearance fireplace planned for installation including make and mod lfand Colorado Phase 11 certifications or Phase 11 EPA certification? Yes No Not necessary for this project 18. Does the plan include a comply with the U Yes No sonry fireplace including a fireplace section indicating design to Building Code Chapter 31? Not necessary for this project 19. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that egress/rescue windows from sleeping rooms an r basements comply with the requirements of the Uniform Building Code? Yes No Not necessary for this project 20. Does the plan include a natural light and ventill Yes No (O ow schedule or other verification that windows provide ion for all habitable rooms? Not necessary for this project 21. Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass doors, glazing immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as a walking surface; slid' glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub enclosures and specety glazing for these areas? Yes No Not necessary for this project 22. Do the plans include a c plete design for all mechanical systems planned for installation in this building? Yes No Not necessary for this project 23. Have all areas in the building been accurately identified for the intended use? (Occupancy as identified in the Uniform Building Code Table 5-A) Yes No Not necessary for this project 24. Does the plan indicate the quantity, form, use and storage of any hazardous materials that may be in use in this b ding? Yes No Not necessary for this project 25. Is the location of all nater and liquid petroleum gas furnaces, boilers and water heaters indicated on the plan? Yes No Not necessary for this project 26. Do the plans indicate the cation and dimension of restroom facilities and if more than four employees and bo sexes are employed, facilities for both sexes? Yes NoNot necessary for this project 27. Do the plans indicate that strooms and access to the building are handicapped accessible? Yes No Not necessary for this project 28. Have two (2) complete $s of construction drawings been submitted with the application? Yes No 29. Have you designed or had plan designed while considering building and other construction code requ ments? Yes No Not necessary for this project 30. Does the plan accurately ' 'cate what you intend to construct and what will receive a final inspection by the G eld County Building Department? Yes No 31. Do you understand that a proval for design and/or construction changes are required prior to the implement son of these changes? Yes No 32. Do you understand that the B ding Department will collect a "Plan Review" fee from you at the time of applicati and that you will be required to pay the "Permit" fee as well as any "Septic S em" or "Road Impact" fees required, at the time you pick up your building permit? Yes No 33. Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the Uniform Building Code including approval on a final inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy and occupancy of the building? Yes No r 34. Are you aware that the perso signing the Permit Application whether the "Owner", "Agent of the Owner", "G eral Contractor", "Contractor" or otherwise, signing the application is the party r sponsible for the project complying with the Uniform Codes? Yes No 35. Are you aware that twenty-four (24) hour notice is required for all inspections? Inspections will be made from Battlement Mesa to West Glenwood in the mornings and from Glenwood Springs to Carbondale, in the afternoon. Morning inspections must be called in by 12:00 p.m. the day before; afternoon inspections must be called in by 4:00 p.m. the day before. Failure to give twenty-four (24) hour notice for inspections will delay your inspection one (1) day. Inspections are to be called in to 384-5003. 36. Are you aware that prior to issuance of a building permit you are required to show proof of a driveway access permit or eslitain a statement from the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department stating a is not necessary? You can contact the Road & Bridge Department at 625-860 Yes No 37. Do you understand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed Electrician and Plumber to perform installations and hookups? The license number will be required at time of inspecidn. Yes No 38. Are you aware, that on the ont of the building permit application you will need to fill in the Parcell Schedule N er for the lot you are applying for this permit on prior to issuance of the buildinpermit? Your attention in this is appreciated. Yes No of -r4 14--64 14/4/14 (-4,111.°14 44„ae,/(1,44 I hereby acknowledge that I have read, understand, and answered these questions to the best of my ability. ature V • -r Date 6 SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER EN1GI,NEERS & SURVEYORS July 16, 2002 Mr. Randy Withee, PE Garfield County Engineer 144 East Third Street Rifle, CO 81650 E 15 w„ 6711, SUITE 200 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, C0 8 160 1 970-945-1004 FX; 970-945-5948 Re: Garfield County Search & Rescue Bldg Garfield County Road & Bridge Airport Facility Site Dear Mr. Withee: P.O. 90X 2155 .n3PiN. CO 81612 970.925.6727 FX: 970-925.4 # 57 '7E37E1 ii.rTE F.O. BOX 3088 CRESTED BUTTE. CO 81 224 970-349-5355 MC; 970-349-5358 Per your request, we have investigated the above facility, with the intent of verifying it's compliance with current Garfield County Building Department requirements. These are: • Roof snow load - 40 psf • Wind load - basic wind speed 80 mph, Exposure B • Seismic - Zone 1 • Foundations - minimum footing embedment for frost is 36" Schmueser Gordon Meyer prepared the construction documents that relocated this building from the Cathedral Bluffs Tract west of State Hwy 13 to the Garfield County Road & Bridge site south of the airport. This included design and field observation of the foundation. SGM acknowledges the foundation has been designed in accordance with the above criteria, and performed periodic observations to verify the foundation was constructed in conformance with the drawings. Field observation reports are attached. When the building was purchased from the previous owner, there was no documentation that identified the building's original design criteria or capacities. During construction, we are not aware that any photo records were kept or inspections performed to document erection procedures. We visited the site, measured all exposed members, and noted bolt numbers, sizes, and x -brace locations. We then performed an analysis on the members, and find them to be adequate to resist the above loadings, assuming a minimum of ASTM A36 material for members, A325 bolts for connections, and ASTM A475 material for X -bracing. No materials testing was performed. Since the building has interior liner panels, we could not visually verify all connections have been made per the project requirements. We did remove panels at several locations, and were able to observe x -bracing, column bolting to foundation, connection of girts to frames, and found the construction in all areas checked to be in conformance with the project requirements. If this quality of construction were carried through the remainder of the building, it is reasonable to assume the building has been properly constructed. If more verification is required, we would recommend the original contractor be engaged to dismantle the building to allow visual inspection as needed. July 16, 2002 Page 2 of 2 Should you have any further questions concerning the above, please call me at 945- 1004. vanE f; Sincerely, 0P�APb� �' s: q �9 �3 ea egi 6i. s'1 a( 10y '' ' , V.e cA 1/446—' Alt n William B. Swigert,PE ,a? a 'p I -4 Cc: Andy Schwaller Steve Hackett SCHMUESER i GORDON MEYER E1.1011,1ERS & SURVEYORS Field Observation Report Project Garfield County Maintenance Building Job No. 2000-188.001 Client Garfield County Road & Bridge Attn: Tom Russell Contractor Alpine CM By Bill Swigert Date November 17, 2000 Time 8:15 am Weather partly cloudy, 20 to 30 deg. F Observations: observed isolated pad footings formed on the south side of the building. Reinforcing had been placed in the bottom of the footings, and reinforcing cages for the pilasters were in place. Reinforcing had proper clear distances and spacings. Contractor indicated that at the footings, the soil had been overexcavated to bedrock, then select material was provided to the proper grade. Select material was observed in the bottom of the forms. SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER ENGIhf EERS & SURVEYORS Field Observation Report Project Garfield County Maintenance Building Job No. 2000-188.001 Client Garfield County Road & Bridge Attn: Tom Russell Contractor Alpine CM By Bill Swigert Date November 28, 2000 Time 8:30 am Weather overcast, 30 to 40 deg. F Observations: observed stem wall forming and reinforcing placement along the south, east, and west walls. Vertical and horizontal reinforcing was in place in accordance with the drawings. Contractor had not installed the #5 tie at each pilaster. Contractor requested to extend the #5 just outside the pilaster, and splice on an additional bar to the proper length after the wall was backfilled. l informed him this was acceptable if he provided a minimum of 36 bar diameter lap. Contractor also questioned the final stubout location for the slab trench drain. The drawings currently shown the drain extending out the rear of the building (to the south). I told him to verify with the client (Tom Russell) where the drainage was to be routed to prior to the slab pour. Contractor indicated he planned to pour the balance of the grade beams on Friday, 12/1. SCHMUESER GORDON i MEYER ENGINEERS & SURVEYORS Field Observation Report Project Garfield County Maintenance Building Job No. 2000-188.001 Client Garfield County Road & Bridge Attn: Tom Russell Contractor Alpine CM By Bill Swigert Date November 30, 2000 Time 11:45 am Weather ptly cldy, 30 to 40 deg. F Observations: I observed stem wall forming and reinforcing placement along the north and west walls. Vertical and horizontal reinforcing was in place in accordance with the drawings. Contractor had installed the #5 tie at each pilaster. The Contractor questioned the location of the main electrical service. I told him to verify with the client (Tom Russell) where the utility was to be routed to prior to the slab pour. The Contractor indicated he would erect the building and heat it prior to pouring the slab. Steve Hackett From: Steve Hackett Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 3:59 PM To: Mark Bean; Ed Green Cc: Randy Withee Subject: Search & Rescue Building and new County Maintenence Operations Center (2 Buildings) Concerning the new MOC (2 Buildings) it is important that either the County Building Department or an independent Colorado Registered Professional Engineer or Architect be called to do all of the required inspections on these buildings so that we will be able to demonstrate compliance with 1997 Uniform Building Code, Mechanical Code, Plumbing Code and Electrical Code and be able to issue a Certificate of Occupancy when they are finished. To date, footings have been poured on the buildings with no inspection by this department and no permit has been issued. Engineering approval will need to be submitted for the footing work that was not inspected by our building department. Concerning the already built building being used by SAR. I have all the information required to issue and CO a permit except final approval by a Colorado Registered Professional Engineer or Architect. Bill Swigert of SGM engineers was involved with foundation design and approval. He is willing to provide us with documentation that the foundation meets appropriate codes. However, he was not involved in reerecting the remainder of the building and would have to spend considerable time doing measurements and engineering calculations in order to certify snow Toad safety and other structural compliance issues. We need the building to be certified as compliant in order to issue the Building Permit and Certificate of Occupancy. Thank you for your help. Steve 6/28/2002 ,54411) efh^-4 carie -44, S Al Pvc.'-r- Sterne Hackett From: Mark Bean Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 1:04 PM To: Steve Hackett Subject: FW: road n bridge moc at tate airport site telephone service by qwest Sounds like some misunderstanding re: search & rescue. Other permit will be in place soon. ----Original Message ---- From: Randy Withee Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 12:20 PM To: Ed Green Cc: Mark Bean Subject: RE: road n bridge moc at the airport site telephone service by qwest Ed, In regards with the MOC buildings, we (I, CMC, & Marvin) met with Andy Schwaller yesterday morning and he was satisfied with CMC responses and should be issuing a building permit either today or Monday. In regards with the SAR bldg, it was my understanding through previous conversations with Marvin that the bldg received a final inspection and a CO was issued, but I will recheck. Withee -----Original Message From: Ed Green[mailto:egreen@garfield-county,comj Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 7:44 AM To: Randy Withee • Subject: FW: road n bridge moc at the airport site telephone service by qwest Randy, lease get with Steve and work out the necessary permitting for all three buildings. ed -----Original Message From: Steve Hackett Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 4:17 PM To: Mark Bean; Ed Green Cc: Jeff Nelson; Randy Withee; Wendy Mead Subject: RE: road n bridge moc at the airport site telephone service by qwest Mark, et al. l assigned the address of 0540 CR 333 (Hunter Mesa Rd) to the unnamed building being used by Garfield Search and Rescue, more than a month ago. That was given to Lanny Grant. This particular building has not yet had a final inspection and certificate of occupancy issued and should not be being use. The new Maintenance Operation Center buildings (2), currently being built without a permit, will be addressed as 0567 CR 352 (Airport Road), based on the "best guess" of Don Horton, CMC Group Superintendent, about where the driveway might intersect with CR 352. No site plan has ever been seen in my office on either of these jobs for purposes of addressing.a Steve 6/28/2002 , --Original Message --- From: Mark Bean Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 7:44 AM To: Jeff Nelson , Cc: Steve Hackett Subject: RB: road n bridge moc at the airport site telephone service by qwest I have asked Steve Hackett to look at it. We need to decide whether we want to address it off of 352 or 333. Addresses are a measurement, so we can't really just create one. P1! have Steve give you a call. Mark -----Original Message --- From: Jeff Nelson Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 5:52 PM To: Mark Bean Cc: Randy Withee; Wendy Mead Subject: road n bridge moc at the airport site telephone service by qwest Mark, The telephone company states that they need a physical address before they can process the order for the above mentioned project. The project location is the 43 acres site adjacent to cr 352 directly south of garco airport. Do you have and address or could you create one? thanks Jeff T Nelson Assistant County Engineer jneison@garfield-county.com Garfield County Engineering Dept. 144 E Third St. Rifle, Co. 81650 tel: 970-625-6172 fax: 970-825-0908 6/2S/2002 File Notes- Meeting with Bill Swigert 7.18.02 SGM letter dated July 17, 2002. Bill with SGM left letter stating that the structural aspects are in compliance with the building code. He said the building is strictly a garage without offices or a bathroom. There is electrical wiring in the building but no service hookup. Apline C.M. were the contractors on the job and appeared to do a good job installing the building. It was moved from a Parachute location and is maybe 20 years old. Bill said there was adequate drainage around the building. An email was sent to Randy Withee regarding the meeting. Andy Schwaller Steve Hackett From: Steve Hackett Sent: Thursday, March 28, ;uz 12:1 To: Ed Green; Tom Russell Cc: Mark Bean Subject: Building Code Violation March 28, 2002 ar re d oun4— Mr. Ed Green, Administrator Mr. Tom Russell, Road & Bridge Director Garfield County 109 8thStreet Glenwood Springs, Co 81601 (Delivery by electronic mail) Dear Sirs, BUILDING & PLANNING DEPARTMENT Code Compliance Office shackettggarfield-county. cam An investigation by this office has revealed that a five bay steel service building has been erected on a concrete foundation on land owned by your organization at the 0452 mile mark on Garfield County Road 333. There are no records of a building permit having been issued for this structure. It is a violation of Colorado Revised Statutes 30-28-205 & 210, 1994 Uniform Building Code, to erect such a building without a building permit. You are hereby given notice, pursuant to the above statutes, that you must completely correct the violations within thirty (30) days of the date this notice is received. Please be advised that violation of the above statutes is a misdemeanor crime punishable by a fine of not more than $100.00 or imprisonment for not more than ten days, or both, and that each day that the violation continues is deemed to be a separate offense. If you have any questions regarding what actions are required to achieve compliance, or you wish to report compliance action taken, please contact this office in writing at the address below, or by e-mail at the address above. Sincerely, 3/28/2002 109 8th Street, Suite 303, Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 (970) 945-8212 (970) 285-7972 Fax: (970) 384-3470 Page 1 of 1 Garai Road& Bridge From: Bill Swigert <bills@sgm-inc.com> To: Tom Russell (E-mail) <garcorb@sopris.net> Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2000 10:42 AM Attach: Field Observation Report 11-17.doc; Field Observation Report 11-28.doc Subject: GARCO Maintenance Bldg. am including field observation reports to date for the foundation inspection on the above project, Any questions, please call 945-1004. Everything looked ok. «Field Observation Report 11-17.doc» «Field Observation Report 11-28.doc» John, superintendent for Alpine CM, questioned where the drain for the slab trenchdrain was supposed to be routed to outside the building. I told him to check with you, so that the drain would be stubbed thru the foundation in the proper place. Thanks, William Swigert, P.E. Web Page: http://www.sgm-inc.com email: bills@sgm-inc.com <mallto:bills@sgm-inc.com> Schmueser Gordon Meyer, Inc. 118 W. 6th Street, Suite 200 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 (970)945-1004 (970)945-5948 FAX 11/30/00 Andy Schwaller From: Steve Hackett Sent: Friday, September 13, 2002 4:07 PM To: Randy Withee Cc: Andy Schwailer Subject: RE: Search and Rescue Building Randy OK Thanks Steve Original Message From: Randy Withee Sent: Friday, September 13, 2002 2:35 PM To: Steve Hackett Cc: Andy Schwaller Subject: RE: Search and Rescue Building Steve, The work will be done probably the fatter part of October. CMC is supposed to submit thawing(s) to the Bldg. & Planning Dept, for a permit to add a bathroom, to construct the items listed below, etc I belieue that should'be within the next week or two, Withee Original Message---T- From, Steve Hackett Sent: Friday, September 13, 2002 2:25 PM To: Randy Withee Cc: Andy Schwaller Subject: FW: Search and Rescue Building Randy, Any idea when this work will be done? flocked at it on 9111102. We need to be able to issue the CO. I know, what 1 do for a living irritates everyone I contact, but it's a job. Steve Original Message From: Andy Schwaller Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 12:25 PM To: Steve Hackett Subject: FW: Search and Rescue Building Original Message -- F rom: essage----_From: Andy Schwaller Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 10:56 AM To: Randy Withee Cc: Mark Bean 1. ti Subject: Search and Rescue Building Randy, We did a pre final inspection for the building on July 23, 2002. The building is complete except for the following items. 1. Locksets are missing on the north walk-through door. 2. Landings are required outside the walk-through doors. These landings need to be level with the thresholds but may have a slope of 2% away from the door. 3. Final grading around the building is needed . 4. The floor drain drywell and drainage line need to be completed. Any additional electrical work will not require a building permit, but will require a state electrical permit. I understand the electric service is getting closer to the site. Please call if you have any questions. Andy 2 Garfield County Building and Planning Department 109 8th Street, Suite 303 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 970.945.8212 Fax 970.384.3470 Plan analysis based on the 1997 Uniform Building Code Project Number: 1 Project Name: Search and Rescue Address: Occupancy: S3 Construction: V -N 31-m, PA, +Isr 7A- 23-0a Date: July 22, 2002 Contractor: Architect: Engineer: Report By: Andy Schwaller NOTE: The code items listed in this report are not intended to be a complete listing of all possible code requirements in the 1997 UBC. It is a guide to selected sections of the code. Report created using Plan Analyst software by b w & a. (719) 599-5622 Portions of the material contained in this program are reproduced from the Uniform Building Code with the permission of the International Conference of Building Officials. DIRECTION BOUNDARY NORTH Property line EAST Property line SOUTH Property line WEST Property line Allowable area increased 100.% for open -- Sec. 505.1 SEPARATION AREA INCREASE 60.0 Feet 60.0 Feet 60.0 Feet 60.0 Feet FL NAME FIRE PROTECTION 60.0 Feet emt.)r 60.0 Feet 60.0 Feet 1 .;L LL 5 O 60.0 Feet area on 4 sides. OCC MAX FLR AREA ALLOWED RATIO STATUS 1 Parking Garage TOTAL FOR FLOOR BUILDING TOTAL -- Sec. 504 and Table 5-B 83 ok 3255 3255 3255 16000 16000 16000 0.2 0.2 0.2 The actual height of this building is 16. feet. The maximum height of the building is 40. feet. -- Table 5-B ok ok ok t -i Page # 2 Code review for: Project Id.: Search and Rescue Address: EXTERIOR WALL FIRE RATINGS AND OPENING PROTECTION Table 5-A (4 NORTH For Bearing Non -Bearing Opening Construction Parapet Occupancy Wall Wall Protection Material Required S3 0 hour 0 hour None Any No EAST For Bearing Non -Bearing Opening Construction Parapet Occupancy Wall Wall Protection Material Required S3 0 hour 0 hour None Any No SOUTH For Bearing Non -Bearing Opening Construction Parapet Occupancy Wall Wall Protection Material Required S3 0 hour 0 hour None Any No WEST For Bearing Non -Bearing Opening Construction Parapet Occupancy Wall Wall Protection Material Required S3 0 hour 0 hour None Any No None No fire protection requirements for openings. 3/4 hour Openings are to be protected with 3/4 hr fire assemblies. 50% of the area of the wall maximum. -- Table 5-A, Footnote 5 & Sec. 503.2.2 Maximum single window size is 84 sq.ft. with no dimension greater than 12 feet. -- Sec. 713.8 Not Allowed Openings are not permitted in this wall. OTHER BUILDING ELEMENTS Table 6-A ELEMENT MATERIAL RATING Interior Bearing wall Any 0 hr Interior nonbrg wall Any 0 hr Structural Frame Any 0 hr Exterior Struct Frame Any 0 hr Floor/Ceiling Assembly Any 0 hr Roof/Ceiling Assembly Any 0 hr Stairs Any None NOTES See footnote #1 See Footnote #9 FOOTNOTES: 1) Elements in an exterior wall located where openings are not permitted or where protection of openings is required, shall be protected against external fire exposure as required for exterior bearing walls or the structural frame, whichever is greater. -- Table 6-A, footnote 1 9) In areas with vehicles or airplanes, the floor shall be of noncombustible, nonabsorbent materials. -- Sec. 307.2.2 Page # 3 Code review for: Project Id.: Search and Rescue Address: PENETRATIONS OF FIRERESISTIVE ASSEMBLIES WALLS ASSEMBLIES -- Sec. 709.6 Through penetrations: 1) Penetrations shall be installed as tested in the rated assembly. -- Sec. 709.6.2 2) Penetrations shall be protected by an approved penetration firestop system and shall have an F rating of not less than the required rating of the wall penetrated. --- Sec. 709.6.3 Exception: When penetrating items are steel, ferrous or copper pipes or steel conduits and the wall is concrete or masonry, the annular space shall be permitted to be grout or mortar. The minimum thickness is the thickness required to maintain the fire rating. The maximum size of the penetrating items is equivalent to a 6 -inch diameter and the opening is a maximum of 144 square inches. -- Sec. 709.6.1 Membrane penetrations: The requirements are the same as for through penetrations. -- Sec. 709.7 Exceptions: 1. Steel electrical outlet boxes that do not exceed 16 square inches provided that the area of such openings does not exceed 100 square inches for any 100 square feet of wall area. Boxes on opposite sides of the assembly shall be separated by a horizontal distance of not less than 24 inches 2. Sprinklers with metal escutcheon plates. Noncombustible penetrating items shall not be connected to combustible materials on both sides of the membrane unless it can be confirmed that the fire -resistive integrity of wall is maintained. -- Sec. 709.7 Page # 4 Code review for: Project Id.: Search and Rescue Address: FLOOR/CEILING AND ROOF/CEILING ASSEMBLIES -- Sec. 710.2 Through pentrations: Through penetrations of fire -resistive horizontal assemblies shall be enclosed in fire -resistive shaft enclosures. -- Sec. 710.2.1 Exceptions: 1. When penetrating items are steel, ferrous or copper conduits, pipes, tubes and vents through a single concrete floor, the annular space shall be permitted to be grout or mortar. The minimum thickness is the thickness required to maintain the fire rating. The maximum size of the penetrating items is equivalent to a 6 -inch diameter and the opening is a maximum of 144 square inches. 2. Electrical outlet boxes that have been tested for use in fire -assemblies. The system shall have an F rating and a T rating of not less than one hour but not less than the required rating of the floor system. -- Sec. 710.2.3 Exception: Floor penetrations contained and located within the cavity of a wall do not require a T rating. Membrane penetrations: The requirements are the same as for through penetrations. -- Sec. 710.3 Exceptions: 1. When penetrating items are steel, ferrous or copper conduits, electrical outlet boxes, pipes, tubes and vents through concrete or masonry and the annular space is protected by an approved penetration firestop assembly or protected to prevent the free passage of flame and products of combustion. Such penetrations shall not exceed an aggregate area of 100 square inches in any 100 square feet of ceiling area in assemblies without penetrations. 2. Electrical outlet boxes that have been tested for use in fire -assemblies. 3. Sprinklers with metal escutcheon plates. Fire -resistive roofs may have unprotected openings. -- Sec. 710.4 Page # 5 Code review for: Project Id.: Search and Rescue Address: SMOKE and FIRE DAMPERS -- Sec. 713.10 and 713.11 Dampers shall be accessible for inspection and servicing: 1. Penetrations through area separation walls. Penetrations through occupancy separations. 2. Penetrations of the fire -resistive construction of horizontal exit walls or corridors serving as a means of egress. Exception: Openings for steel ducts penetrating the required fire -resistive construction of corridors are not required to have smoke dampers when such ducts are of not less than 0.019 -inch thickness (26 gage) and have no openings serving the corridor. 3. Penetrations of shaft enclosures. Exceptions: 1. Duct penetrations by steel exhaust air subducts extending vertically upward at least 22 inches above the top of the opening in a vented shaft where the airflow is upward. 2. Penetrations of a fire -resistive floor forming the base of a shaft enclosure may be protected by fire dampers listed for installation in the horizontal position. 3. Smoke dampers are not required when shaft is exhaust only, and is used for continuously operating fans. 4. Penetrations of the ceiling of fire -resistive floor -ceiling or roof -ceiling assemblies. Exception: Smoke dampers are not required. 5. Penetrations of an atrium enclosure element. Exception: Smoke dampers are not required. 6. Penetrations of exterior walls where protection of openings is required. Exception: Smoke dampers are not required. 7. Penetrations of areas of refuge. Exception: Ventilation system designed to supply outside air during an emergency. 8. Smoke dampers are required in smoke barriers and elevator lobbies. DRAFT STOPS: If there is combustible construction in the roof/ceiling assembly, draft stops shall be installed so that the area of concealed space does not exceed 3,000 square feet and so that the horizontal dimension between stops does not exceed 60 feet. -- Sec. 708.3.1.2.2 Code review for: Project Id.: Search and Rescue Address: EXIT REQUIREMENTS: FL NAME NUMB MIN MIN PANIC HALLWAY/ DOOR NOTES OCC EXITS WIDTH HDWR CORRIDOR SWING Page # 6 1 Parking Garage TOTAL 16 1 3.2 No N/A N/R 16 1 3.2 No N/A N/R Door swing is based on Sec. 1003.3.1.5 except as noted.7 :iliu 7 �c-� Occupant load factor is based on Table 10--A. Number of exits is based on Table 10-A except as noted. 5��caj al° Exit width is in inches and based on Sec. 1003.2.3 and Table 10-B acts Exit width is to be divided approximately equally among exits:ac,('y -- Sec. 1003.2.3.2 k) U j& 7ittiocic, rf a` Width shown for all areas is based on other egress components.t� �`S' 1r boom Width shown for 1st floor is based on other egress components. Width shown for other floors & basements is based on stairways. -- Table 10-8 For the minimum width of doors, see Sec. 1003.3.1.3 1ra gs. For the minimum width of hallways, see Sec. 1004.3.3.2 •K. For the minimum width of corridors, see Sec. 1004.3.4.2 For the minimum width of stairways, see Sec. 1003.3.3.2 FOOTNOTES: FLUSH AND SURFACE BOLTS: Manually operated edge- or surface -mounted flush bolts and surface bolts or any other type of device that may be used to close or restrain the the door other than by operation of the locking device shall not be used. When automatic flush bolts are used, the door leaf having the automatic flush bolt shall not have a door knob or surface -mounted hardware. The unlatching of any leaf shall not require more than one operation. -- Sec. 1003.3.1.8 LOCKS AND LATCHES: w j�S' L Q� RrN ea a- I xtc-+4-�F Regardless of the occupant load served, exit doors shall be openable from the inside without the use of a key or any special knowledge or effort. -- Sec. 1003.3.1.8 Key -locking hardware may be used on the main exit when the main exit consists of a single door or pair of doors if there is a sign stating THIS DOOR MUST REMAIN UNLOCKED DURING BUSINESS HOURS. When unlocked, door(s) must swing without operation of any latching device. -- exc. Code review for: Project Id.: Search and Rescue Address: LANDINGS AT DOORS: Page # 7 1) A floor or landing shall be provided on each side of doors. When access for persons with disabilities is required. the floor or landing shall not be more than 1/2 inch lower than the threshold. When access is not required, the maximum is 1 inch. -- Sec. 1003.3.1.6 2) Landings shall have a width not less than the width of the stairway or width of the doorway, whichever is the greater. Where a landing serves an occupant load of 50 or more, doors in any position shall not reduce the landing dimension to less than one half it required width. The minimum length in the direction of exit travel is 44 inches. -- Sec. 1003.3.1.7 TRAVEL DISTANCE: (distance to an exit) The maximum travel distance in this building is 200 feet. -- Sec. 1004.2.5. The travel distance for the major occupancy may be 30 feet. -- Sec. 1004.2.5.2.5 Travel distance shall not be limited within an exit enclosure or exit passageway. -- Sec. 1005.2.2 1-77;AUS4 g/A107, /JO- ern , 44-0)kict 3 cb4 40(4 cl,p dyc" --0„wz Page # 8 Code review for: Project Id.: Search and Rescue Address: BUILDING ACCESSIBILITY: 1) T is building including each tenant shall be prarided with at least on entrance which complies with the accessi e route provisions of CAB ANSI A117.1. At least 50 percent of al{ entrances shall be accessible. -- Sec. 1103.2.3 2) When m re that one exit is required from any accessible space, each accessi e portion of the space shall/be served by not less than two accessib e means of egress. -- Sec11104.1.1 3) When an exstairway is part of,an accessible means of egress, the stairway sh 1 have a clear wiyOh of not less than 48 inches between the handrails The stairway shall either incorporate an area of refuge within an enla ged story -level. landing or shall be accessed from an area of refu--- Sed 1104.1.2 The area of refu. shalt have direct access to the stairway that serves it.--Sec.1104.21// 4) Each area of refuge�hall be sized to accommodate one wheelchair space not less than 30;rnch s by 48 inches for each 200 occupants, or portion thereof% -- Se 1104.2.3 5) If the area o refuge i not within the stairway, it shall be separated from the rest of the sto y by a smoke barrier having at least a one- hour fire.4esistance ratink Smoke barriers shall extend to the roof or floor dck above. Doors shah be smoke and draft control assemblies with.a rating not less than minutes. -- Sec. 1104.2.4 6) Two way communications are req fired. --- Sec. 1104.2.5 7) E«ch area must be identified by sign stating AREA OF REFUGE and the nternational symbol of accessibility. ---- Sec. 1104.2.7 8 NOTE: Exit stairways in buildings protected throughout by an approved automatic sprinkler system are NOT required to incorporate an area of refuge. -- Sec. 1104.1.2, Exception 2 ROOFING REQUIREMENTS: 1) The roofing on this building is required to be Class C:'-- Table 15-A 2) See section 1504 and ICBO research reports for requ ements. AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEMS: 0Y ff If openings are not provided in each 50 feet of exterior wall or there is floor area more than 75 feet from an exterior opening, an automatic sprinkler system is required. Sec. 904.2.2 Note: Openings shall have a minimum dimension of 30 inches. There must be at least 20 sq.ft. of opening in every 50 lineal feet of wall. STANDPIPE REQUIREMENTS: There is no requirement for a standpipe. -- Table 9-A FOOTNOTES: Page # 9 Code review for: Project Id.: Search and Rescue Address: VENTILATION: (Z Ovmp All areas customarily occupied by humans shall be provided with natural ventilation by means of openable exterior openings with an area of not less than 1/20 of the total floor area or shall be provided with a mechanically operated ventilation system. Such system shall be capable of supplying a minimum of 15 cubic feet per minute of outside air per occupant. -- Sec. 1202.2.1 ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS: For S3 occupancy 1) In parking garages where any parking is located more than 5 feet above the adjacent grade, vehicle barriers shall be provided. -- Sec. 311.2.3.5 2) The minimum clear height is required to be 7 feet. -- Sec. 311.2.3.3 3) Parking garages require a ventilation system that exhausts 1.5 cfm per sq.ft. of floor area. -- Sec. 1202.2.7 51'77"AfiE 17h4 -.N RAD Sis�. c7'rcan `T -Ai4 imt, fie,G • 2 (41.116-L-Fi ?1 f1 S cc fy 7 r e tc ��uAut Page # 10 Code review for: Project Id.: Search and Rescue Address: GLAZING REQUIREMENTS All glazing in hazardous locations is required to be of safety glazing material. -- Sec. 2406.3 & 2406.4 Locations: 1) Glazing in ingress and egress doors except jalousies.-" 2) Glazing in fixed and sliding panels of sliding door assemblies and panels in swinging doors other than wardrobe doors. 3) Glazing in storm doors. 4) Glazing in all unframed swinging doors. 5) Glazing in doors and enclosures for hot tubs, whirlpools, saunas, steam rooms, bathtubs and showers. Glazing in any portion of a building wall enclosing these compartments where the bottom exposed edge of the glazing is less than 60 inches above a standing surface and drain inlet. 6) Glazing in fixed or operable panels adjacent to a door where the nearest exposed edge of the glazing is within a 24 -inch arc of either vertical edge of the door in a closed position and where the bottom exposed edge of the glazing is less than 60 inches above the walking surface. 7) Glazing in an individual fixed or operable panel, other than those locations described in items 5 and 6 above, than meets all of the following conditions: A. Exposed area of an individual pane greater than 9 square feet. B. Exposed bottom edge less than 18 inches above the floor. C. Exposed top edge greater than 36 inches above the floor. D. One or more walking surfaces within 36 inches horizontally of the plane of the glazing. 8) Glazing in railings regardless of height above a walking surface. Included are structural baluster panels and nonstructural in -fill panels. 9) Glazing in walls and fences used as the barrier for indoor and outdoor swimming pools and spas when the bottom edges is less than 60 inches above the pool side and the glazing is within 5 feet of the pool or spa water's edge. 10) Glazing in walls enclosing stairway landings or within 5 feet of then bottom and top of stairways where the bottom edge is less than 60 inches above the walking surface. ALPINE C.M., INC. 1111 Si 12114 St . GRAND JUNCTION. CO 81501 * 9701245-2535 + FAX 970/2454591 FAX COVER SST DATE: 116 I) 114 TO: FAX COMPANY ...,.., d' c _ 1 TOTAL PAGES C'tBD (i ,UL ING COVFM EMT) FROM: �- t LL ltd ar�. �� �.... ` 1_ 11.E h� dw+1G.ri TO 34 0(1.17 • i SNI HDD i6gZ-517Z-QL6 tt'8t 666I/9I/T9 October 30, 2000 Garfield County Road and Bridge Attn: Tom Russell P.O. Box 2 Rifle, Colorado 81650 Hepworth-Pawlal{ Geotechnical, Inc. 5020 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Phone; 970-945-7988 Fax: 970-945-8454 hpgeo @hpgeotoch.coni Job No. 1.99 200-1 Subject: Observation of Backhoe Pits, Proposed Equipment Storage Building, Airport Property, County Road 333, Garfield County, Colorado Dear Mr. Russell: As requested, a representative of Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. observed the excavation and backhoe pits at the subject site on October 23 & 24, 2000, to evaluate the materials exposed for foundation support. The findings of our work and recommendations for the foundation design are presented in this report. The work was done in accordance with our agreement for geotechnical engineering services to you, dated October 20, 2000. We previously performed a preliminary geotechnical study for the 42 acre airport parcel in which the building site is located submitting our findings in a report dated March 19, 1999, Job No. 199 200. It is planned to move an existing 150 feet long by 32 feet wide steel frame and metal - skin building to the site in the area of our previous Borings 5 and 6. The floor will be slab -on -grade at an elevation about 1 foot above the current site grade. The building has been designed to be supported by isolated pad footings with grade beams using an allowable bearing pressure of 2000 psf. On October 23 the excavation had been cut to rough subgrade to about 12 feet below the adjacent ground surface and daylighting to the north and west. The materials exposed in the bottom of the excavation consisted of hard weathered shale bedrock in the southern portion, very stiff sandy clay in the central portion, and loose on-site fill in the northern portion. Due to the existing fill and variable bearing conditions, it was decided to excavate backhoe pits at the site. On October 24, we observed 4 backhoe pits excavated near the approximate four corners of the proposed building. A summary Garfield County Road and Bridge October 30, 2000 Page 2 of the subsurface conditions encountered in the pits are provided in Table I. In general the subsoils consisted of up to about 2 feet of loose on-site fill and very stiff sandy clay soils overlying about '/z to 3 feet of medium hard and weathered claystone shale. The backhoe refused on very hard sandstone bedrock at depths from about 1/2 to 4 feet in the pits. Results of swell -consolidation testing performed on samples taken from the site, shown on Fig. 1, indicate the weathered claystone is slightly compressible under conditions of loading and wetting with a moderate swell potential when wetted under a constant light surcharge. The laboratory is summarized in Table II. No free water was encountered in the pits and the soils and bedrock materials were slightly moist. Considering the conditions exposed in the pit excavations and the nature of the proposed construction, spread footings placed on the hard sandstone bedrock designed for an allowable bearing pressure of 4000 psf can be used for support of the proposed building. The weathered claystone shale tends to expand when wetted and should be removed from below footings areas. The pad footings should be a minimum width of 2 feet. All fill, very sandy clay soils and weathered (gray) claystone shale in footing areas should be removed and the bearing level extended down to the hard (light brown) sandstone bedrock. It may be feasible to reduce frost protection depth for bearing on the hard sandstone bedrock if desired. Avoid from below the grade beam should be provided if the expansion shale is not removed. A perimeter foundation drain should not be needed due to the slab -at -grade construction. There is a risk of slab settlement and/or heave due to the uncompacted fill and expansive claystone shale. Removal and replacement of the material could be done to limit the risk of slab movement. Structural fill placed within floor slab areas can consist of the on-site soils and well broken bedrock compacted to at least 95 % of standard Proctor density at a moisture content at to slightly above optimum. Backfill placed around the structure should be well compacted and the surface graded to prevent ponding within at Least 10 feet of the building. The recommendations submitted in this letter are based on our observation of the soils exposed within the pit excavations and the previous limited subsurface exploration in the area of the site. This study is based on the assumption that material beneath the footings and at other areas of the building site have equal or better support than those exposed. The risk of foundation movement may be greater than indicated in this report H -P GEOTECH Garfield County Road and Bridge ' October 30, 2000 Page 3 because of possible variations in the subsurface conditions. We should observe the foundation excavation to evaluate the bearing conditions exposed. If there are any questions or if we may be of further assistance, please let us know. Sincerely, HEPW-ORTH - WLt@L` 1HNICAL, INC. iT1? +pm David A. Young,.. `S CJ °/ _D c3,440..3; 32-2 6 s. Rev. y: DEH � `��°�aa+•�.i '44figet1 400 DAY/ksw attachments cc: Alpine Construction Management - Attn: Kevin Nourse Schmueser Gordon Meyer- Attn: Bill Swigert H P GEOTECH Compression -- Expansion % 2 1 0 1 2 3 Moisture Content 4.6 percent Dry Density = 128 pcf Sample of: Weathered Claystone Shale From: Pit 3 at 1'/z Feet Expansion upon - wetting 0.1 1.0 10 APPLIED PRESSURE -- ksf r 100 199 200-1 HEPWORTH -- PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. SWELL—CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Fig. 1 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. TABLE I SUMMARY OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS ENCOUNTERED IN BACKHOE PITS Job No. 199 200-1 PIT LOCATION DEPTH SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS I Northeast Building Corner 0 - 2' man placed on-site fill 2' - 3' weathered claystone shale • 3' refusal on sandstone bedrock 2 Northwest Building Corner 0 - 2' man placed on-site fill 2' - 3' very sandy clay 3' refusal on sandstone bedrock 3 Southwest Building Corner 0 - %' man placed fill W- 1' very sandy clay 1' - 4' weathered claystone shale 4' refusal on sandstone bedrock 4 Southeast Building Corner 0 -1/x' weathered claystone shale 1/2' • refusal on sandstone bedrock HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. TABLE it SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS JOB NO.199 200-1'5 SAMPLE LOCATION NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT (%) NATURAL DRY DENSITY (pcfl GRADATION PERCENT PASSING NO. 200 SIEVE ATTERBERG LIMITS UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (PSF) SOIL 0R — BEDROCK TYPE PIT DEPTH (feet) GRAVEL (%I SAND (%1 LIQUID LIM!T (%) PLASTIC INDEX (961 2 1 5.6 102 79 sandy clay with gravel (fill) 3 1 1/2 4.6 128 weathered claystone shale November 16, 2000 Garfield County Road and Bridge Attn: Toni Russell P.O. Box 2 Rifle, Colorado 81650 Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. 5020 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Picone: 970-945-7988 Fax: 970-945-8454 hpgeo@hpgeotech.coni Job No. 199 200-1 Subject: Observation of Excavation, Proposed Equipment Storage Building, Airport Property, County Road 333, Garfield County Dear Mr. Russell: As requested by Alpine Construction Management, a representative of Hepworth- Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. observed the excavation at the subject site on November 2 and 14, 2000 to evaluate the soils exposed for slab and foundation support. The findings of our work and recommendations for the foundation design are presented in this report. We previously observed backhoe pits excavated at the site for design of foundations and presented our findings in a report dated October 30, 2000, Job No. 199 200-1. The proposed construction is similar to that discussed in the previous report. During our November 2 site visit, we observed the building floor slab area had been cut at one level from 1 to 3 feet below adjacent ground surface. The existing fill, clay soils and most of the weathered claystone shale had been removed. At the time of our November 14 site visit, the foundation excavation was essentially complete and had been cut in generally one level from about 21/2 to 4 feet below the adjacent ground surface. The foundation excavation stepped down about 1 to 3 feet below the interior floor slab area. The materials exposed in the bottom of the slab and foundation excavation consisted primarily of hard to very hard sandstone bedrock. In the southern end of the excavation, a limited area of claystone shale was exposed at subgrade. The claystone was hard and did not appear expansive. No free water was encountered in the excavation and the bedrock materials were slightly moist to moist. The conditions exposed in the excavation are consistent with those previously encountered on the site and suitable for support of spread footings designed for the recommended allowable bearing pressure of 4,000 psf. Loose and disturbed materials should be removed in the footing areas to expose the undisturbed hard bedrock. It should be feasible to use a limited depth of compacted base course or crushed rock to level the footing subgrade areas. Imported pit -run gravel or base course is suitable as fill below the floor slab. Other recommendations presented in our previous report which are applicable should also be observed. Garfield County Road and Bridge November 16, 2000 Page 2 The recommendations submitted in this letter are based on our observation of the materials exposed within the foundation excavation and the previous limited subsurface exploration at the site. Variations in the subsurface conditions below the excavation could increase the risk of foundation movement. We should be advised of any variations encountered in the excavation conditions for possible changes to recommendations contained in this letter. If there are any questions or if we may be of further assistance, please let us know. Sincerely, HEPW tRTH - ' A { � .�Io1N CAL, INC. I o , 4 cc 9 ; 2Y David A. Young,B.43... Rev. by: DEH ��C? //17'4)Y e.,$' *1�°'3��4 e"dit t;It %t DAY/ksw cc: Alpine Construction Management - Attn: Kevin Nourse Schmueser Gordon Meyer - Attn: Bill Swigert H -P GEOTECH ,a TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING RELOCATION EQUIPMENT STORAGE BUILDING VEGETATION MANAGEMENT BUILDING August 2000 Prepared by: Schmueser Gordon Meyer, inc. Date: August 1, 2000 Il 5/47f9 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING RELOCATION Table of Contents Section Title 1.0 Scope 2.0 Demolition/Dismantling 3.0 Earthwork 4.0 Concrete 5.0 Metal Buildings 6.0 Submittals 7.0 Inspection and Testing Appendix A Utility Demolition 1.0 ' Scope Work includes dismantling the Equipment Storage Building and the Vegetation Management Building an the Occidental Oil site 40 miles northwest of Rifle, transporting the building materials to the Garfield CountylRifle Service Center site near the Rifle airport, installing new foundations, and erecting the buildings. A more detailed list of the scope, which is not all-inclusive, is as follows: 1.1 Disconnect and dismantle existing utilities connected to the buildings. 1.2 Individually mark all pieces of the buildings, including frames, girts, purlins, and siding. 1.3 Verify existing foundation dimensions with new foundation plans, including anchor bolt location and size, and face of girt dimensions. 1.4 Dismantle the buildings into sections that will allow transport over the highway. 1.5 Install new building foundations. 1.6 Erect building framing, including frames, girts, and purlins. Modify girt framing as required for new overhead doors and existing doors to be raised up. 1.7 Install existing siding. Modify as required for new openings. Patch existing openings to be abandoned. 1.8 Install utilities, including vents, heaters, lights, outlets, and panels. 2.0 Demolition/Dismantling 2.1 Utilities shall be disconnected and removed from the buildings, and dispositioned in accordance with Appendix A, Utility Demolition. If units are found to be damaged prior to dismantling, the County Representative shall be notified before removal. Units shall be packaged as required for transportation to prevent damage. Utilities (panels, etc.) to be left onsite shall be coordinated with the site, and shall be delivered to areas onsite as directed. Utilities to be transported to the Rifle Shop site or the Landfill site, shall be done so at the time and location as directed by the County Representative. 2.2 Building components shall be individually marked, dismantled, and transported to the Garfield County site for erection. Pieces shall be stockpiled and transported to prevent damage during the operation. 2.3 The Contractor shall review the proposed foundation plan and compare it with the existing building/foundation, redline any discrepancies in dimensions and conditions, and submit one copy to the Engineer. The Engineer will make necessary modifications for the final construction drawings. No additional payment will be made due to modifications. 3 2.4 The Contractor shall transport all materials to the location specified in accordance with local, state, and federal Department of Transportation regulations. 2.5 The Contractor shall stockpile materials in the location as directed by the County Representative, and properly protect from the weather until erection. 3.0 Earthwork 3.1 Foundation design and earthwork is based on the preliminary report performed by Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc., dated March 19, 1999, Job No. 199 200. Design criteria is as follows: Maximum soil bearing pressure 2000 psf Equivalent fluid pressure (active) 45 pcf A copy of the report is available for review at the Garfield County Road & Bridge Office. 3.2 Actual building location and top of foundation elevation will be provided by the County. Contractor should assume maximum cuts and fills of 5 ft. in depth. Footings shall bear on undisturbed natural soils or siltstone/sandstone bedrock. When footing excavations are complete, HP Geotech will be contacted by the owner to verify soil design criteria, and determine the need for a foundation drain. if required, the drain would be added scope. Inspection will be paid for by the Owner. 3.3 Backfill around foundation walls and under slabs shall be on-site soils, compacted to a minimum of 95% of standard Proctor density near optimum moisture content. Walls shall be backfilled evenly. A 4" layer of free draining gravel shall be placed below the slab. 4.0 Concrete 4.1 Concrete shall be mixed, placed, cured, and tested in accordance with Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete, ACI 318- 95. Concrete mix shall conform to the following: Mimumum 28 day compressive strength - 3500 psi Water/cement ratio - 0.45 Entrained air - 5% to 7% Slump 3" (plus or minus 1") 4.2 Reinforcing shall conform to ASTM A615, Grade 60. Lap all reinforcing 40 bar diameters unless noted otherwise. Construction joints not shown on the drawings shall not be installed without prior approval from the Engineer. 4.3 Trench drain shall be ACO or approved equal, complete with trench, traffic rated grate, junction box, and 4" PVC drain line. Drain line shall be extended to 5 ft. outside the foundation, capped, backfilled, and the location marked for future connection. 4 4.4 Concrete cylinders shall be molded, cured, and tested in accordance with ASTM C31 and C39. One set of cylinders shall be taken for each day's pour, with a minimum of one set each for footings, foundation wall, and slab. The Contractor shall pay for all testing under this contract. Concrete not meeting the specifications will be repaired or replaced at the discretion of the County. 4.5 Slabs shall be floated, and finished as directed by the County Representative. A commercial grade curing compound shall be applied. Slabs shall have control joints sawcut within 24 hours of pouring. Joints shall be cleaned and filled with an elastomeric caulk. 5.0 Metal Buildings 5.1 Metal buildings shall be erected in accordance with the Metal Building Manufacturer's Association Common Industry Practices. Foundations and new framing shall conform to the following: Code Uniform Building Code, 1994 Edition Snow 40 psf Wind 80 mph, Exposure C Seismic Zone 1 Primary and secondary members shall be reassembled using existing bolt holes. Fasteners may be re -used if not damaged. Siding shall be re -installed using existing fastener holes as much as possible. Abandoned holes in siding, if required, shall be filled and made weathertight. 5.2 .. Existing doors shall be reinstalled at the correct height as shown on the building elevations. Doors on the Maintenance Building will require framing to be raised approximately 14". New thresholds shall be installed if existing cannot be salvaged. Doors shall be lubricated and adjusted as required to provide proper operation, 5.3 New overhead doors on the Maintenance Building shall be 16'- 0"x12'-0" sectional steel doors, Thermospan 200 as manufactured by Wayne -Dalton or approved equal. Doors shall be 2" thickness, insulated, with 3" rollers and double track, and windows at eye level. Electric openers shall also be provided and installed. Framing shall be installed as required to support the doors, and shall be designed to transfer the wind load on the door to the main frame members. Door opener may be supported from the existing secondary framing. 5 5.4 Existing building utilities shall be reinstalled as indicated in Appendix A. Utilities shall be wired to the main building panel; the County will arrange for power to be supplied to the panel. Wiring shall be performed in accordance with local codes. If existing Maintenance Building panel requires replacement due to additional door operator loads, the Contractor shall provide a suitable panel under this contract. The Contractor shall test all equipment to demonstrate it is in working order. Electrical power to the buildings may not be available at time of completion of work, which will require the Contractor to complete the testing at a later date under this contract. 6.0 Submittals Contractor shall submit the following for approval, prior to purchase, fabrication, or construction: ■ Construction schedule • Foundation dimension redlines • Concrete mix design ■ Trench drain • Overhead door framing design • Overhead door and opener information 7.0 Inspection and Testing The following shall be inspected and/or tested during construction: • Footing excavation • backfill material and compaction • reinforcing prior to pouring concrete • concrete cylinders for footing, foundation wall and slab pours ■ framing after erection • doors ■ building utility operation Items inspected or tested that do not meet the above specification will be replaced or repaired at the discretion of the County Representative. 6 Appendix A Utility Demolition Equipment Storage Building - Pages Al thru Al2 Vegetation Management Building — Pages A13 thru A21 ' ' f Page A 1 Garfield Co. Building Relocation SCOPE OF WORK Equipment Storage Building 30'x150' No. Location Description Each Notes: Demolition 41 Alarmicontrol panels 5 Remove & store onsite Building Modification 51 raise all doors 14" Utilities 61 CL 1.5 6 ft. flourescent lights 4 Remove & Reinstall to "E" side of bldg 62 CL 1-2 8 ft. flourescent lights 2 Remove & Reinstall to "E" side of bldg 63 CL 3 1 Remove & Reinstall to "E" side of bldg 64 CL 4.8 1 Remove & Reinstall to "E" side of bldg 65 CL 6 1 Remove & Reinstall to "E" side of bldg 66 emergency light packs 3 Remove & Deliver to Rifle Shop Site 67 CL 1.5 B exit sign 1 Remove & Reinstall 68 AHU 3 Remove & Deliver to Landfill Site 69 AHU Panels 3 Remove & Deliver to Landfill Site 70 Small panels 3 Remove & Deliver to Landfill Site 71 conduit, Sch. 40 all Remove & Deliver to Landfill Site 72 105(3' wall vents 3 Remove & Deliver to Landfill Site 73 exterior lights 6 Remove & Reinstall 74 main building power 1 Remove & Reinstall THE FOLLOWING IMAGES ARE THE BEST COPY AVAILABLE AT TIME OF SCANNING A2 EQUIPMENT STORAGE BUILDING NORTH ELEVATION EQUIPMENT STORAGE BUILDING SOUTH ELEVATION ocet.41,-rt=s1;`1 - '17.▪ 1- "I, kf:*4.44.•;. are . 14!.4.4.:•4)11g4tP -- .„,-4-••-'10 • ,L.&•0„1,F.,, e-4'44W-Mifj".40141V4p,.,490•:.' '74:41144/j,74: • —2 = • A.- 4a_ • ••••N 4,7C , v. . 14r.:ARMer:^4-e.t.t..k .5 _ --.441:61-„.,....,&.-c•ra.:...mtr. • svf.R.,,A*1-• it..00. 1,A.; 4%74- •-;t1t,„ 14-4' 40,- • 4,41;:g.i.,t4w4.-,,,,r.Wft,tv A..,1 -1V4, • -'!",,TC:4„ , •• = '45144, 444- - • --4," - ";- ,-;,!•4,e,rtte 7!"1.,'." ‘trri..1., 4 ;Mk xr.V1t4:4 ;4701 4t...!",:21,_, Alley - " .74 - • .tar4.7,- EQUIPMENT STORAGE BUILDING WEST ELEVATION Al EQUIPMENT STORAGE BUILDING VIEW: COLUMN IA iQ EQUIPMENT STORAGE BUILDING VIEW: COLUMN I.0 Ir-AtiVreV~4:1*24MMIMSMI:tiZfrA. `,4 EQUIPMENT STORAGE BUILDING VIEW: COLUMN 2C EQUIPMENT STORAGE BUILDING VIEW: LENGTH OF BLDG STANDING AT SOUTH END /o EQUIPMENT STORAGE BUILDING VI HIM: COLUMN 4A s+rrtyl-ti. chip' EQUIPMENT STORAGE BUILDING VIEW: COLUMN 3A EQUIPMENT STORAGE BUILDING VIEW: COLUMN 4C Page A 13 Garfield Coi Building Relocation SCOPE OF WORK Vegetation Management Building No. Location Description Each Notes: Demolition 1 Piping Remove piping as req'd to dismantle building 2 Panels Remove & store onsite 3 Wood lean-to Remove & dispose of offsite to landfill Building Modification Utilities 21 Lighting Panel E39A 1 Remove & Reinstall 22 AHU 1 Remove & Deliver to Landfill Site 23 8 ft. flourescent 8 Remove & Reinstall 24 gas heaters & vents 2 Remove & Reinstall 25 duplex outlets 4 Remove & Reinstall 26 large exterior lights 2 Remove & Deliver to Rifle Shop Site small exterior lights 3 Remove & Reinstall 27 motorized ridge vent 2 Remove & Reinstall VEGETATION MANAGEMENT BUILDING NORTH ELEVATION IQ 3 VEGETATION MANAGEMENT BUILDING EAST ELEVATION f6 VEGETATION MANAGEMENT BUILDING SOUTH ELEVATION •-•.- • , • - " " . • • - "- — 77 - • "' —" _/,' 7 7 • • - — - "Is g I • ••••1 . . , P., 444' A 1141' , g.;:.+n- • • - , , •-• _ t:. • - VEGETATION MANAGEMENT BUILDING WEST ELEVATION xk ti VEGETATION MANAGEMENT BUILDING VIEW: COLUMN 3B COL VEGETATION MANAGEMENT BUILDING VIEW: NORTHWEST DOOR i 2 VEGETATION MANAGEMENT BUILDING COLUMNS 2C, 3C 2/ VEGETATION MANAGEMENT BUILDING COLUMNS IA. 1B, 1C Keenan Consulting Group Engineering Consultants • November 25, 2002 Andy Schwaller Garfield Co, Colorado Building Department Glenwood •Springs, CO RE: Garfield County, CO Search and Rescue Storage Facility 2174 South Broadway • Denver, Colorado • 80210-4402 (303) 282-9411 • FAX 282-9412 • E -Mail: keenancseibrn.net After further review of the building use the following design modifications are proposed: '1. , Modify specified unit°heaters to units with 100 MBH SL Input • 2. Revise ventilation as follows: 8E-1 Grecnhcek Model SPE 24 or equal Dayton. Capacity 4000CFM at .375" SP,1040 RPM. Eiec % .DP Motor, verily. power. Furnish: Wall louver with backdralt damper, starter, fan guard. Interlock with outside air intake damper. Revise intake opening and damper to 36"x 36". 3. Delete carbon n o side'detection and control system. Control EF -1 and outside air intake damper with wall switch. Control is to include a timer to shut off fan and close damper one hour after turn on. 4. Revise gas pipe sizing to the following with reduced gas loads. (:I') Gas line which serves three units: 1 '/Z" Gas line which serves two units: 1 '/" Gas line to each individual unit heater: 1" Please review this proposed modification for this project. If th any question ore if we can furnish additional information contact our office. Ronald D eenan. Cc Craig genes -CMC INSPECTION WILL NOT BE MADE UNLESS THIS CARD IS POSTED ON THE JOB 24 HOURS NOTICE REQUIRED FOR INSPECTIONS NOTICE REQUIRED FOR INSPECTIONS BUILDING PERMIT GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO Date Issue i * .'/ OP4wwZoned Area ' Permit No. S Z AGREEMENT In consideration of the issuance of this,permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with all laws and regulations related to the zoning, location; construction and erection of the proposed structure for which this permit is granted, and further agrees that if the above said regulations are not fully complied with in the zoning, location, erection and construction of the above described structure, the permit may then be revoked by notice from the County Building Inspector and IMM DIATELY BECOME NULL AND VOID. useE9-73 cirOr tom, 4110 • artnt•'Kk9n to r: Address or Legal Description OwneC�� ekk ,Setbacks Front S'de Side Rear This Card Must Be Posted So It is Plainly Visible From The Street Until Final Inspection. I INSPECTION RECORD Footing 5ulco, - SA pi X HG,nr, ) Foundation b„,41,07 ug S G of K Underground Plumbing - , Insulation Rough Plumbing g R Drywall pe/ Chimney & Vent,/..- -05 , - Electric Final (by State inector) J- - sp Gas Piping f/ _a,(®.. p.�77 Final I ,-aiii` p5 Electric Rough (By State Inspector) Septic Final 6. Framing Z, le...o ws, S4/7/ Z54. (To include Roof in place and Windows and Doors installed). Notes: ALL.LISTED ITEMS MUST BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE COVERING - WHETHER INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR, UNDERGROUND OR ABOVE GROUND. THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE Phone 384-5003 109 8th Street County Courthouse Glenwood Springs, Colorado. APPROVEDDO NOT DESTROY THIS CARD DateBy IF PLACED OUTSIDE - COVER WITH CLEAR PLASTIC