HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication- PermitJob Address�� �
GARFIELD COUNTY
BUILDING, SANITATION,
and PLANNING DEPARTMENT
109 8th, Street, Suite 303
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601(970) 945-8212
Nature of work Building Permit
No. 8481
Amount of Pennjt$ Sao 7, /7 Date """` /3) aUc
Clerk
r.
GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION
GARFiELD COUNTY (GLENWOOD SPRINGS), COLORADO
PERMIT NO. ECM I
TELEPHONE: (9705 945-8212
INSPECTION LEVE: (970)384-5003
PARCEL/SCHEDULE NO.
S G.1} T. �p S• IG. . ‘,1.,.1 , S (2 Th ri P .
TOB ADDRESS: S 1121 LOT 10..1
1
'
LOT NO. .I. BLOCK NO. SUBD1VLSION/EX>; TIOti
LkwK
2
° G LE Nwb.p TnA v iy Co
ATw"es -P.O. -R coy. l6 08 G.' WS
rm. q Lig •> 3L
"�rm. CNS •? /6i)
3
�UNTRAcroa STP F; wr$It.Patt tl
Acc• sR • �ja' � p I :+ I' l ? S' [ G IF [.� Co
,
'& is 2S -35
N0 9%-°°63 {{
,
4
ARQgILLTRMi®(Chc. a a S a_o or
ATnssss p.a. -Aax /60
'a ct' fS • 73-1(,
-- 1? $ 0 f)
5
K rr. orsoaea•o C( p{ 1 Q '• G4 to p,
rr. OF Lar 8 0 A„c.a. e .
smcarr 40
. a swami 3
6
tim°rscsmva t)Qr..A. T nA... -riR.wseMi4L♦ R.?iA1L, E2-owA.r12_1!.n• itte-r, e - C'E-F--(C-i
7
moms ,am N Ew C a A. wow c...ti oer
8
CLAM Cc COaR. 041W :.Dg[naN °ACTR,.TE,' 010.1111.0Vs
9
OARACIL =Ma/ °DOCILE CARPORT. Mal =O(aR
10
a DRIVEWAT linuar
XI RITE ReWA°s PAL CWT ) RAN
!! �`
...."...YAI9ATI41R
VAI,UAr"i7 O..,O.r. $ 1 6256, 00 0
11113.$1. COPRIXDORIP Get RFiet.D couv?cr,—Sf,2C1Ac. VSa ?£ia.,,,,c'r- 0$104/02,
NOTICE
A SEPARATE ELEC.'IRICAL PERMIT IS REQUIRED AND MUST BE ISSUED BY THE STATE OF
COLORADO-
THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION
AUTHORIZED IS NOT CO CED WITHIN NO DAYS, OR IF CONSTRUCTION OR
WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 110 DAYS AT ANY TIME
AFTER woRx 15 COMMENCED.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAM NED THIS APPLICATION AND
KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS
OOVERNINGT'HIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED WTr H WHETHER SPECIFIED
HEREIN OR NOT. THE GRAI'TLtiO OF A PERMIT DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE
AC RIIY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR
LOCAL LAW REGUCA 0 CONSTRUCTION OR THE PERFORMANCE OF
PLAN CHECK FEE:
3z 13,44
PERMIT FEE:
4993.75.
TOTAL FEE: DATE PERMIT ISSSSUpED:
s zo 7.14 V' r 's
OCC: GROUP:
A a / J S 1 S 1
3
CONST: TYPE:
1 _
, • ♦ _. _t
ZONING:
SETBACKS:
CON. ..0°...
le ,....- Ar— Data CV t(• 0 2
011,
�,�
•
rosx
r/
�7�
MANI/ HOME:
ISDS NO. R FEE:
c , 01)
�
J •
ApplvvsilDgts r .- ....
AGREEMENT
PERMISSION 1S HEREBY GRANTED TO 111E APPLICANT AS OWNER, CONTRACTOR AND/OR THE AC1ENT OF THE. CONTRACTOR OR OWNER TO CONSTR -CT THE STRUCTURE
DETAILED ON PIANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SUBMITTED TO AND REVIEWED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMEDIT.
IN CONSIDERATION OF T11F. ISSUANCE OF THIS PER -MIL TEE 5ICNER HEREBY AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL BUILDING CODES AND IAND USE REGULATIONS ADOPTED
GARFIEiD COUNTY PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GIVEN 1N 3011101 CRS AS AMENDED. TIS. SICT'ER FURTHER AGREES THAT IF THE ABOVE SAID ORDINANCES ARE NOT PLL
COMPLIED WITH LN THE LOCATION. ERECTION, CONSTRUCTION AND USE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED STRUCTURE, THE PERMIT MAY THEN BE REVOKED BY NOTICE FRC
TIE COUNTY AND TET THEN AND THERE IT SHALL BECOME NULL AND VOID
THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT BASED UPON PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA SHALL NOT PREVENT THE BUILDING OFFICIAL FROM THEREAFTER REQLIR NG T
CORRECTION OF ERRORS IC SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA OR FRO PREVENTLNO BUILDING OPERATION BEING CARRIED ON THEREUNDER WHEN
VIOLATION OF THIS CODE OR ANY OTHER ORDINANCE OR REGULATION OF THIS JURISDICTION.
THE REVIEW OF THE SUBMITTED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND INSPECTIONS CONDUCTED THEREAFTER DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ACCEPTANCE OF A:
RESPONSIBILITIES OR LIABILITIES BY GAR.FIELD COUNTY FOR ERRORS. OMISSIONS OA DISCREPANCIES. THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR T1153E =AS AND IINPLEMENTATT•
DURING CONSTRUCTION RESTS SPECIFICALLY WITH T1M. ARCHITECT, DESIGNER BUILDER AND OWNER. CONDADITS ARE INTENDED TO BE CONSERVATIVE AND IN SUPPO
OF TETE OWNERS INTEREST.
Gd°rmoo3 I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE AGREEMENT ABOVE. alma)
1
The following items are required by Garfield County for a final inspection:
1. A final EIectrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inispector;
2. Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department posted where readily
visible from access road; -
3. A finished roof, a lockable house, complete exterior siding,,exterior doors and windows
installed, •a complete kitchen with cabinets, a sink with hot & cold running water, non-absorbent
kitchen floor coverings, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove and refrigerator, alI
necessary plumbing;
4. A complete bathroom, with washbowl, tub or shower, toilet stool, hot and cold running water,
non-absorbent floors and walls finished and a privacy door;
5. All steps outside or inside over three (3) steps must have handrails, guardrails on balconies or
decks over 30" high constructed to all 1994 UBC requirements;
6. Outside grading done to where water will detour away from the building;
7. Exceptions to the outside steps, decks and grading may be made upon the demonstration of
extenuating circumstances, i.e. weather, but a Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until
all the required items are completed and a final inspection made.
A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE ABOVE
ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED.
****CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY
(C.O.) IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL BE
CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATING
PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET.
I understand and agree to abide by the above conditions for occupanc
Certificate of Occupancy for the dwelling under building permit #
and the issuance of a
G.([ -o2
Signature Date
bpcont
GLENWOOD "TRAMWAY COMPANY
Permit and Plan Review Fees
Lower Floor:
2,209 s.f. L $87.40* = $193,066.60
Main Floor:
3,786 s.f. @ $87.40* = $330,896.40
Upper Floor:
2,997 s.f. @ $87.40* = $261,937.80
Covered Terminal:
1.920 s.f. @iu $24.00 = $ 46,080.00
Covered Deck:
1,167 s.f. @ $24.00 = $ 28,008.00
Total Valuation = $859,988.80
* Building Valuation Data for Public Buildings of Type V 1 -hour
construction. $95.00 x 0.92 Colorado Modifier = $87.40 per sq. ft.
First $500,000 = $3,233.75
$360,000 x $4.75 = $1,710.00
Permit Fee = $4,943.75
Plan Review Fee = $3,213.44 (65% of Permit Fee)
Total Fee = $8,157.19
INSPECTION WILL NOT BE MADE UNLESS
THIS CARD IS POSTED ON THE JOB
24 HOURS NOTICE REQUIRED FOR INSPECTIONS
BUILDING PERMIT
GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO
Date Issuedl..16.Q .Zoned Area Permit No. NO
AGREEMENT
In consideration of the issuance of this permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with all
laws and regulations related to the ?oiling, location; construction and erection of the proposed
structure for which this permit is granted, and further agrees that if the above said regulations
are not fully complied with in the zoning, location, erection and construction of the above
described structure, the permit may then be revoked by notice from the County Building
Ins i or and IMMEDIATELY BECOME NULL AND VOID.
Use
C54retl+sani'
Cr,
Address Legal Description
Owne 1 Qe,D
a
Contractor
-A trristo
Setbacks Front Side' Side Rear
This Card Must Be Posted So It is Plainly Visible From The Street Until Final Inspection.
. INSPECTION RECORD
Footing d
Foundation e x
Underground Plumbing
Insulation' -v3
d ,
Rough Plumbing n C c2. .p,3
Drywall 3 0 3
•�•K 11$
Chimney & Vent
Electric Final (by State Inspector
I /
Gas Piping O r,2.]fi• D ate-
Final 41_2,1_03 14_.. a
Electric Rough (By State Inspector}'P,
Septic Final 0(
Framing 2. Zig,.d
(To include oof in place and Windows
and Doors instalkd).
r
Notes:
ALL LISTED ITEMS MUST BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE COVERING -
WHETIIER INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR, UNDERGROUND OR ABOVE GROUND.
THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE
Phone 384-5003 109 8th Street County Courthouse Glenwood Springs, Colorado.
APPROVEDDO NOT DESTROY THIS CARD
Date ByllithICC
IF PLACED OUTSIDE - CER WITH CLEAR PLASTIC
XOVDLAND & ASSOCIATES
Consulting in Building and Fire Codes
Fire Investigation
MEMORANDUM
To: Andy Schwaller
From: Art Houglarui
Date: July 27, 2002
Subject: Tramway Upper Terminal
Andy,
Chuck Peterson revised Sheets P1, P2 & P3 on July 17, 2002 to provide for
corrections indicated in my July 2"d Correction Report. 1 reviewed these revisions to
verify that they substantially address the July 2nd Correction report for those sheets.
There are a few corrections to these revised sheets and those are addressed in my
July 19'h review of the recisions. Mr. Peterson requested that 1 redline the new
corrections on these sheets and 1 have done this.
Mr. Peterson also sent me a letter dated July 15, 2002 indicating that he is in
agreement with the corrections indicate on my July 2"d report and that these are
part of the permit requirements. Most are the type of corrections that can be
implemented during construction. The exceptions are the one-hour fire -resistive
construction of the exterior walls (UBC Table 5A) and the other is the LPG removal
system (UMC Sec.304.5).
The exterior wall system indicated has not been shown to be a listed
assembly so Mr. Peterson should either provide you with verification that the
assembly is a qualifying assembly or provide an alternative complying assembly. A
design for the LPG removal should be reviewed and approved prior to construction
since its installation is at the base of the structure.
Call me if you have any questions.
ca .2002
1
TELE/FAX (970) 963-8312 / 61316 CODNTY ROAD 100 / CLR80NDgLE, C0LORUO / 81623 / Cresiaral.net
•
XOUILAND & ASSOCIATES
Consulting in Building and Fire Codes
Fire Investigation
July 19, 2002
Chuck Peterson
Glenwood Tramway Company
302 8th Street, P.O. Drawer 160
Glenwood Springs, CO 81602
Subject: July 17, 2002 revisions for Tramway Upper Terminal
Dear Chuck:
Thanks for sending me the revisions to review. The revised plan will provide for the
second exit from the Lower Level and seems to be a good option. I did not have the
opportunity to review your revisions until this morning so in the interest of saving your
time I will fax my observations and comments about the revision to you for your
consideration. I will be gone this afternoon but you can leave me a message if you have
questions. Also, let me know if you would like to make the suggested revisions to your
plans or if you would like me to indicate them on the plans that you provided. If you
want to make the changes to your plans 1 can pick them up from you the first of the week.
If you want me to indicate them on these plans let me know and 1 will do this and get the
plans back to Garfield County by Tuesday or Wednesday.
In your letter you indicated that you agree with the items listed on the correction report
and these can be made pari of the permit requirements. Thanks for your cooperation on
this review. The project when completed will be an asset to our tourist industry.
Sincerely,
rt Flougland
TELE/FAX (970) 963-2312 / 5019 COUNTY ROAD 100 / CARBONDALE, COLORADO / 81923 / Ciresele@ret.aet
Glenwood Tramway Company
July 15, 2002
Art Hougland
Hougland & Associates
5616 County Road 100
Carbondale, CO 81623
RE: Glenwood Tramway Visitor's Center
Garfield County Building Permit
Dear Art:
Thank you for taking the time to meet with me last Thursday. Your review was thorough and
your suggestions for changes appropriate. Based on your suggestions, we have revised the
building design to allow for a protected corridor on the main floor. Hopefully these changes
will allow the stairway to he classified as an approved egress route and therefore meeting the
requirement for a second egress route from the lower and upper floors.
We have reviewed the items listed on your corrective report. We are in agreement with these
0 items and they can be made a part of the permit requirements.
Please give me a call if you need additional information. Thank you.
•
Sincerely,
GLENWOOD TRAMWAY COMPANY
Charles Peterson, P.E.
President
CP/kz
302 8th Street, Suite 325 • P.O. Drawer 16o • Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 . (970) 945-2236 .
FAX (970) 945-2977
Jun -27-02 02:56P
•
0
970 945-2977 P.02
FrPk
UPPER LEVEL BATHROOMS
4C*_ 114`.17
DATE 8/27/02
SCALE
1/4.01'0'
ENGINEER CRP
CHECKED RC
JaB 846-01
®{LIEIn1VMQD TRAMWAY CO.
VISITORS CENTER
1113Df EG8 LEVEL SA rI1L`6¢Dcut
ENCIPMEINIUPOdi, LTI.
12,1=w&a. gas g. ba°�eo��0
_ (.7.)we nssr ru w5-N77
Jun -27-02 02:56P
•
•
7' 11i'
970 945-2977 P.03
8 —
7 n
(-f
6' 4
-
MAIN LEVEL BATHROOMS
SCAM '%14'41'2'
DATE 6/27/02
SCALE Ii4`=s'o'
ENGINEER cRP
CHECKED RC
JO 846-01
itR,FINI[ 1c?or» TRAMNAV CO.
LJAJPJ LEVEL BATHROOM
EPOGINEEPIONG, LTD.
0 p
..m.wrt7h2$I-wXr
r✓ Jun -2.7-.02..02: 57P
V�
FAX ro.
970 946-2977 P.04
Sun. 27 2062 09:4?AM P2
ICBG Evaluation Service, Inc.
5303 VMOFlKMAN MILL ROAD • WFiTTTIER. CALIFORNIA 90601.299
A subsidiary caporatb' oiOw International Conference of Budding Officials
EVALUION REPORT
Ceppyylr O 111as Evekasssn lbari0a, Lao.
F'?4
Reissued Ahola: 1, ISM
Adria C W INSULATION (fn)
MBuLF0Ali E PANOOO P usivente t118NI.A11ON
10199 PAGEN
MC AVENUE, SUITE 1501 ONOUlfOAM
TACorA, IVAIIiKiTON $4BS
1.0 WA L MOT
sh&tdcam Erpanded Polystyrene (EPS) Insutaden.
2.0 011111ONIFT1ON
2.1 Maa.rlats
2.1.1 badisms 595 8salrls inaeioam CPS is s molded,
doosaoell sapsndad polystyrene learn pisa6c b+the form Of
bonds and archiMiaRuMl stapes. Thermal relistenoe
(AvaIua) tar the Monad domains fa shown A 1111141. The
rgasinuttr t icardea far boards is 5 inches. Boards haw a
in admom 11 neaprsad dim of 26 and a meant" woks -
1 01110 of 460 wt+sn leered m soocecamso with UBC
Standard &1.
2.1.2 Inarllatat 911RI Graft (tom) sears: Thorpe boards
hays a with umof 0.90 (Wend ere road as r cameo -
now in exterior deaatla art and tricot systems (®F8). The
boards ltsw Haas mak requirements for oonelMOnirhg,
product dimensions. maildnQ eros pacedeln%
2.1.3 Waned On. Cast tawesto lewd: RAMPS OnaCbat
Sarno Sherd oahaiaa & 1-inch-ehick (26.4 wren), nova -
nolo vddensay. EPS % nutation boards with a nominid
1.6 -ori donde facer adhered to both aides. The beards ere
ail.elbas in were! catnigvskont 8hsets 2 ball (910 nen) Of
4 fest (1219 mot) wider ate areriads in 114bat 0436 mon)
earths, with *otter 14 y -1l (12.7 in 94010-100t
mm) altiplap
*doom deem
Mess (1 non) a �artillbleon eii i B4o 10-400t (2430
b 3048 trio) MngthR withI4l.p *ea can the IMO Alec
ahawls4ainches aids (1119trot) cos aveitallbhle&to 10 -foot
(243a to 3048 ran) wish Moro adios. The boards
may Pew nominal 1 14-indh-dsp dieresis
Waged a mmtinuan 12 hoots (905 mm) on oentw 0111 tea
boat tics of to basad. See Rade 2 ler adfon t details en
the board edges.
2.1.4 tesl)ratlbylsew lops: Inauileai RGard polyett lens
tape is i0r use an pirft of 1443srd Ono-Cood Saxon 80mrd-
The apo is 8.0 mfr (0.23 mm) tlecir and 2 inches (51 mon)
rase. and fospyied in 36yardione (53 918 woo) rete.
22 Wes
Instil/own EPS k used ea a general, nenetruab rel. tternal
PKlia ce material (1.e., wale (octcr11er and cosibee), rods.
foundations and teammates (outride or reside)). The interiors
of the Wham moult be promoted by a Manuel barrier as
required by Becton 2902.4 of the cads, except as dostrisd
in 8idbts Z3.1 and 2.3.2 Of tots recut
3.3 Spoofed Wart
22.1 Aloes and Oral lipases: Medesen EPS bawt4may
be used en adahOr waft 0l Alio and ward spoon oft no
covering appidd ta the eft or avoid apace aide of lhs fawn
plaebc, provided old to folifting oanditfori Ire net
1. Envy to the crawl apace se arty to aanoto Mies, and
hoer roduoin0 appaanasa sits not pemMuad.
2. Thew are no Wsioarwafod atilt or beealwr4 ares.
3. Air in the odic or cravat apace is net araioled to Opel
pmts et the bidding.
4. IAralatisn kpr'Orfdsd Mot eomdlrs %n h SsoNon 11105 a
Sector 2300.7 d the cods, ss app0osbis.
5. Oaetds having a mater um marina *amity d 1 pd ane
permiaed to be a marinas of 3 Mahn (75 nim) in Midi -
nem and beards having a mae r:ian neonatal sanely of
2 octane perralles to be a rna imam of 2 inches (61 ram)
in Mlkiswes.
6.
swop rand in comas *was ant Untied to *was
manufactured from BASF Sw
Of BPI., or NOVA
Chantal COrpomii 6 D1asd ilfi'l�grade brad*: and
are labeled as shown in Pipule 1.
2.3.2 Atm Mar tnatlfoom EPS or ?HUM one Cant
Some ifuerda my be used an ew waft dank spans with
no ecorarinoapplied es Ow atria aide of the loan dock. pro-
vided Vd the loaowbp oondi0m i are woof
1. late b Hoc epees ie arty to service utilities, and heat-
PtOduoing uppintoas ata not permatsd-
2. Moro ate no inlet onntised attic areas.
3. Arr In las enrol space is not dowelled to other parts of the
4.
1Mn*ili1bn oomedstro9 Wei Staten 1605 of the cods is
preridsd.
5. _ densi-
ty
ty o< 1.5 pc1 oap _ asp denuded to be a nhpdomwti 4aidtt4S6 of
1 inch (25.4 n4e)
6. bnslieem B'S beards weed in attic spaces an Stators 10
these taawhoAirsd ham NOVA Chanieat Corporation
OAP. 1.433 grade beads. and ate labeled as shown iso
Figure 1.
la.s Sarhr. The 1442,45 Ono -Coat
8tu00o donde may to used els ori as dent to Grads P.1
a C papaw spaoieael MUSIC Sbr r je. d 14-1 when Ohs amt. -
ben beams era covered either with macaw dialer comptPrq
with Ssdbn 2608 d Mho coda or wet a camvthl tions enerl0r
wed cooing recognized ina=rent ISO 58 o*$
600 nowt. Tho bawds mint be epscOcabi may
ntred for Oafs use in Mee a wkwrcn span an Ohs eanoenaab s
evelimieamama ofOs'aaaa'r'•Sor+eaaLahr.,envwatt Noy eolerni a Caeca i.i.n411['14neisiaidra.bar..saki the wow
*f. !mot ah ilwrr rtrahievam he olio iw.1.are rawi�lrrelldieerimyuwmrellrgrMr,err_ * •'M/grwrrewiwwrnr►Me.wan►
4feifa/Ir sr dela mamba molt L
1ai7,
rarfiAlma*Malmmil ibatoreeK aa.dnf� olso ins1bXsO'mambo l. %ref.,emrb.ilmeamanimal IR
ma beta= ampere= MrJVIdisrnoir a lm/*rrlra wmtda. lira 1.,+ a.r•r.abjg1C101 atriNn Shinnk tae. df
riscaK,dolman, •lerl ga' Er Vow Emir is die typirtdral ft aro Fraikbetemosoble rereptlkiifmraftr.e•r!M/wylrraferi.ltia4
Pers 1 ds
311n-g.7-D2.02:57P
FRcII .'
•
exeelor ocssng eyK.m. Bee Figure 3 for typal khstpiasan
Miss.
Ms 2- and 4400ewld■ (610 dna 1219 tarn) boards with
tonpus-ef+Bgtoprs joints on*M long edges ars orlsnMd hod -
measly, and tine mnoue mint face tmeterd.
The?. and 44odl-wide (910 end 1216 nen) boards with ■lhi-
pp joints, and the 46 -and 49-lnelt ie (12i S end 1249 mm)
maids wit squsareedges.arestentedrerrtos2y: Jsincsmost
WON owe framing and mast Warty a minirnurn or ire blob
(12.7 nen).
The WOW d Stucco bards arelesected tb exterior framing
spaced a mexfiwm d24 kiU+ee Me nth on centsr. except
ahem further Makes biro* wed cowing. boards we al -
Molted to'renting wring mini ia° ed ting -eerie tui and
f 6r1e-ind►dJemMer (23 a mm) plastic wa■l+ers. or agrrraiRR
*watt at 12 Pali* (806 can) an Caron.
Joint' *brawl boards, and Menus Maid 106,11,1100:46/13.
must be taped alb the kesetroam polyethylene cepa oen0ena4
Ore lee joiu.
twerd Swede boards must be toweled with ■ weep
eceed-
2.4 Demi Prodveek.r:
The boards and ard1Mae ostat shapes are produced at Ste 111 -
NOM diem sib Prewar II*k a IO4, arc/
meows Cissa .Conine .shusedy, urron+roarced
inspections areeerlduced by Laborgiadel Inc.
2.3 klardrleattern
Emmen of marldng for the EPS boards are arae► in Ft -
um 1. Labeling on ineulallon band. %be used iA assoroe ear
alb Swaim 2.3.1 also iudhdes Mie aordrug 'USF 8F.'
'SW SW or NOVA Chmrniesh Dylan M77.` Labeling on
insults= EPS beards ee be wed in amrerdaros WA Section
Trtale= e
rgesswouourrr'sue
_-___�_
■ ms=eodnr.sq
I
0.
3.e
123
J.13
34
1$
133
4.0
2.0
1.3
4.1
970 945-2977 P.05
Jam.
27 2002 09:40Am P3
2.3.2 aim Witless gra wording 'NINA Chernicsle Dyke
MUS.'
M-Gssd Snsaco boards are masked on lane racer with the In -
maim ewe, plant nientlitoslon, thermal c aracterisMm.
snfsoaburtrp cleassoladdies and nom of elle elulMy cori-
dol aperny 0.inda wta■r■ Labnrab ** Mc.). A c lifia■erh ate -
Me Ow insist* type. meredecacees wow pNmlidenlleca-
9on number. pro}ct name, prefect lecatlon. Ul lebsi
euRae..burning cher cartheoe and physical c hs.ca tsfics
of Ila. &S board is issued s she ternsr of text prated.
!.ogymetei 1UIIl1TT11O
Dext h accoredhoe with Me K30 ES Aaoeptenoa CrimA■ br
Foam Pies* lydrdion (ACt2). OW January 1996.
Co MOMS
Tkrt Mie hearibmh.gh.unaed porpalgrena insoluble de-
salts. M eft mend calnpras wide the 1167 1.6J-...
Delklagy Per, siip et is the fellow** Oatdplare:
4.1 Nlsrkrshn bomb see belled ti nanelardral
agokKeliat6 wile seer rpeMiMia teed le bests
wile air maid iteslmtnfef lamas.
4.2 NtealMknheaves amseparated Irma tMtsrrbrof
eke beadmg unci a diselesd Wier oatgldleg 1Mb
Seethe Mf Of iter code, elude as t■bt*cart
'Prick -thick gypsum welts arli Ineteb.d a aesaa-
dntos unlet ampler ?s of to Kedso snow w de
eaiiad M Sadism 2.3.1and 2.32 of this repot.
4.3 ;tntddisn bo■is an rrmeols Wee M Me else&
foam %Meh OMNI le Ur* 2 tilt! "milts vadat
by Leadsmen. Lebemtesha >rce
This repave tr nrtjed sv newasetiaellon a tae team
521 ahs pries
items rte. AWY& Lysol
1.63
165
ra1tee.
34 Stow
3401 Phos
Comma
ro ani'- Miami t50e0
11144162113
4136 Wasik, Nemo
1i4
Oise, "heifenie 91710
ya3
11.1.1 Islonost
. ao
—
CatihrWri OS330
imiserrc
1z 01 nut Yid Awww-stat 114
A.wt Conran* I41011
tau
t1
1-41
leal ass 101
bind. Mirada SIMI
iswilrree
Thwrimer LE.
147
Mg
A6orrtar. tw. Make mm
IV= Rae Saar
As Dan. *ors 971:611
ar
rio acct BWII Book Val s
sac Valley (Bs use 114121)
Y�
lade
14Drcilli as
I add 11�a gagh
Sass [ss& Wu iesee 9141) _
Sun -2`7-02.02:57P
FROM
970 945-2977 P.06
FAX NO. Sun. 27 2002 09:49A 1 P4
12.00000'
1111111.P 4111.12
Per ii+ 1! a 23.4 aim
Piqua 7--4CARO now MILS
--- 2x St6d
R Gord
W,rc loth
G
A
4 4
One Coat
Stucco
Weep
Screed
- Anchor poit
Concrete Sicb
or Footing
TlRessa and °brew s
FROM i—T V CAt. INSIRLLACROSI maks FOR /PRAM Roam A1100‘ cal! w Mlf/acMER•REIMI !IVE &WWII
. 5un-Z7,02.02:58P
FROM
970 945-2977 P.07
FAX O. :
Jun. 27 2002 09:49P1 P5
• al •-• 0 0 ...
da000000' •
0000000r
il00.1 IN MAIO Mu& --..--_____......
R -QM bre 41P------ P00000
'1040000C?
0000001. ...
441 Tle
* )0 0 r
70D a • . . . a .
0 •
• •
Suet WAR .0•1* ----•-•-______a_..
raita% 1.-00.11
wilhot MOW
—.--...... . 0° g
• i . . •
. .2,..,
kaso ;•-• )000 '
I if 00
JO p •
R-0•10 1••• 2 0 0
wit jc:fil
Or•
meristicr rostaise, 1" gc
SW paw *AV. isot+sr
Wits is reerf
careers
Weed Haliontal Moos
Ilmin WTI
111: inch • 23.4 mn. I$4J.ii,
MUM 1../VINCAL DISTALLATION 011111kILS PO* 11-(UUM DONID INIMAIION vairimiMeassowa smunan—opiktimpre
Om coat
itvoce
IAN
n-217 02. 02:56P
f f
•
June 27. 2002
970 945-2977 P.O1
Glenwood Tramway Company
Art Hougland
Hougland Associates
5116 County Road 100
Carbondale, CO 81623
RE: Glenwood Tramway Company
Code Compliance
Dear Art.
We appreciate your careful review of the proposed Visitor's Center for the Glenwood Caverns
Tramway. You had mentioned that you need additional information to complete your review.
This letter report will try to address these items.
The exterior walls will be constructed of ICF units. The brand name of the system is
ThermoFormed. This company licenses the engineering and patents to local building
contractors who purchase the foam panels from authorized supplies and then site
construct the torms. The authorized supplier of the foam is Insulfortn. A copy of the
1CI30 evaluation for that product is attached. The building will be constructed using
Insulform and we will supply verification of the use of that particular form.
2. The 1 hour fire rating is also dependent on the surface treatment used an the outside of
the form. We intend on using a stucco surface on both sides of the foam. The fire
rating on the stucco is a function of the stucco supplier and the installed specification,
We will use stucco material and installation that has a composite rating of 15. In
combination with the Insulform, the resulting exterior walls will have a 1 hour fire
rating.
3. The two upper floors will be equipped with handicap access hat rooms. The lower
floor will not be served by the handicap lift and therefore is not designed to he
handicap accessible. The attached drawings give the sizes of the bathroom facilities for
your review.
We appreciate your review of the building and are always available to answer any questions.
Please give me a call if 1 can be of assistance. Thank you.
Sincerely,
G.I,1N .qOD TRAMWAY ANY
Charles Peterso , P.E.
Manager
302 8th Street, Suite 325 • P.O. Drawer 16o • Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 • (970) 945-2236 • FAX
(97o) 945-2977
•
XOUGLAND & ASSOCIATES
Consulting in Building and Fire Codes
Fire Investigation
TRAMWAY UPPER TERMINAL
GLENWOOD TRAMWAY COMPANY
Review of Revisions 7/17/02
Observations and comments
1. Sheet P1 Upper Floor Plan:
1.1 The width of the accessible toilets in the restroom's scale at less
than the required width of 60 -inches for clear space required under
A 117.1, Sec. 604.
2. Sheet P2 Main Floor Plan:
2.1 The doors between the corridor and the restaurant, retail area,
men's restroom and the Tramway Control Room are required to
be 20-minite fire -rated doors.
2.2 The door between the corridor and the stairs to the Lower Floor
Level is required to be a 20 -minute fire -rated door. I recommend
that you consider having an automatic fire alarm release on this
door also. This would prevent the wedging or blocking of the
door in an open position preventing the separation of atmosphere
between these levels in the event of fire. It also provides for freer
movement a between levels. This is not a requirement but an
option that you may want to consider.
2.3 The store front window <k> between the corridor and the retail
area is to comply with UBC Sec. 1004.3.4.3.2.2 for windows in a
corridor. This Section states "Windows in corridor wall shall be
protected by fixed glazing listed and labeled or marked for a fire -
protection rating of at least three-fourths hour and complying with
Sections 713.8 and 713.9. The total area of windows in a corridor
shall not exceed 25 percent of the area of a common wall with any
room." From the plan and the window schedule it appears as if
the storefront window will exceed 25 -percent of the area of the
wall common between the retail area and the corridor. The door
TtLE/FAZ (970) 963-2313 / 5616 COM 110211 100 / CAR80NDALD, COLORADO / 81623 / firesafe&rot.Det
s
in the open -for -business mode appears to obstruct a portion of this
window and that portion of the window may not be useful. It may
be helpful to place the 25 -percent opening in the portion of wall
between the door in the open position and the wall of the control
room.
3. Sheet P3 Lower Floor Plan:
3.1 The toilet compartments appear to comply for accessibility.
The Roll -in showers appear to also comply with the exception of
one of the grab bars indicated to be mounted behind the seat, the
grab bar is to be opposite the seat.
By:
2
Hougland & Associates
5616 County Road 100
Carbondale, CO 81623
Ph/Fax (970) 963-2312 - mall = firesafe@rof.net
Plan analysis based on
the 1991 Edition of the Uniform Building Code
Project Number: GarCcC6.02
Project Name: Glenwood Tramway Company
Address: Tramway Upper Terminal
Contractor: STP Enterprise
L'esigner: Tramway Engineering, LTD
Engineer: Charles Roger Peterson 1733
occupancy: A3, B, M, Si & S2
Construction: V-lhr
Report By: Art Ho; gland
Date: June 26, 2CO2
NOTE: The code items listed in this report are not intended to be a
complete listing of all possible code requirements in the 199'7 U13C.
It is a guide .o selected sections of the code.
Portions of the material contained in this program are reproduced
from the Uniform Building Code published by the International Conference
of B,:gilding Officials.
Notice:
The review of plans and specifications ices not constitute an acceptance
of any responsibility by Hougland & Associates for errors, omissions or
discrepancies. The responsibility for these items and implementation
during construction rests specifically wits t.`:e architect, engineers,
designers, o.:_lders and owner. Ccmxor.ts and r:o_ations ale intended to be
constructive and in support of the owners interest.
NFPA 13 sprinkler system throughout the building
Sprinkler system used for 1 hr. substitution -- Sec. 500
SEPARATION
DIRECTION BOUNDARY AREA INCREASE
NORTH Property line 500.0 Feet
EAST Property line 500.0 Feet
SOUi'- Property line 500.0 Feet
WEST Property line 500.0 Feet.
Allowable area increased 100.% for open
-- Sec. 505.1
IRE PROTECTION
500.0 Feet
500.0 Feet
500.0 Fee_
500.0 Feet:
area on 4 sides.
FL NAME OCC MAX FLR AREA ALLOWED RATIO STATUS
2 Meeting Room 2 A3 ok 823 21000 0.04 ok
2 Meeting Room 1 R ok 516 28000 0.02 ok
2 Womens HC Restroom :1 ck 111 28000 0.0 ok
2 Mens HC Restroom B ck 111 28000 0.0 ok
2 Tramway Eng. Office B ok 299 28000 0.01 ok
2 Corporate Office B ok 229 28000 0.01 ok
2 Gln. Caverns Office B ck 337 20000 C.C1 ok
2 Furniture Storage S1 ok 132 28000 C.0 ok
2 Non -habitable Area B ok 439 28000 0.02 ok
TOTAL. FOR FLOOR 2997 2552 0.12 ok
1 Retail Sales Room M ok 1303 28003 C.05 ok
1 Tramway Control Room B ok 81 28000 0.3 ok
1 Mens HC Rest Room B ok 158 28000 0.01 ok
1 Womens EIC Rest Room 5 ok 158 28000 0.01 ok
1 Dining Room A3 ok 1006 21000 C.05 o:<
1 Snack Sar Serv. Area E ok 198 28000 0.0: ok
1 Kitchen Fi ok 447 28000 0.02 ok
1 Non -habitable Area B ok 435 2.8000 0.02 ok
TOTAL FOR FLOOR 3786 25722 0.15 ok
B= Staff Lounge R ok 440 28000 0.02 ok
3: Caving Managers 3 ok 334 28000 0.01 o;:
131 Wild Tour Hq. B ok 223 28000 0.01 ok
81 Rest. Storage Rm S2 ok 104 42000 0.0 ok
R: Retail Storage S1 ok :07 28000 0.0 ok
31 Mechanical Room 3 ok 109 28000 0.0 c:{
81 Men's HC Rest Room B ok 107 28000 0.0 ok
B1 Guides Men's Shower L3 ok 95 28000 0.0 ok
31 Womens HC Rest Room 3 ok 107 2900C 0.0 ck
31 Guides womer.s Shower B ek 95 213000 0.0 ok
31 Non -habitable Area B ok 489 28000 0.02 ok
TOTAL FOR FLOOR 2209 28446 0.08 ok
BUILDING TOTAL 6183 51322 0.13 ok
-- Sec. 504 and Table 5-R
An A-3 occupancy in a basement or above the first floor is required
Lo be of 1 hour construction. -- Sec. 303.2.2.2
The actual heig:^t of this building is 36. feel.
The maximum height of the building is 50. feet. -- Table 5-3
EXTERIOR WALL FIRE RATINGS AND OPENING PROTECTION
Table 5-A
NORT:3
For Hearing No::-Bearin:; Open:::q Con;i7.ructIon Parapet
Occupancy Wa11 Wall Protection Material Required
B 1 hour 1 hour None Any No
A3 hour 1 hour None Any No
:{ 1 :our 1 hour None Any No
S1 1 hour 1 hour None Any No
S2 1 hour 1 hour None Any No
2
EAS"'
For Hearing Non -Bearing Opening Constructor. Parapet
Occupancy Wall Wall Protection Material Required
8 1 hour 1 hour None Any No
A3 1 hour : :iour None Any No
M 1 hour 1 hour None Any No
S1 1 hour 1 hour None Any No
52 1 hour 1 hour None Any No
SOUTH
r... , -11VAL' --1 fVu,,:.. .. :Vc.ne- - nay...,_. .....1VV
Si 1 hour 1 hour None Any No
S2 1 hour 1 hour None Any No
WEST
For Hearing Non -Bearing Opening Construct -on Parapet
Occupancy Wall Wall Protection Material Required
El 1 hour 1 hour None Any No
A3 1 hour 1 hour None Any No
M 1 hour 1 hour None Any No
S1 1 hour. 1 hour None Any No
S2 1 hour 1 hour None Any No
None -- No fire pro:-.ection requirements for openings.
OTHER BUILDING ELEMENTS Table 6-A
ELEMENT MATERIAL RATING NOTES
Interior Rearing wa:.1 Any C hr See Footnote Erg
Interior :ion-brg wall Any 0 hr See Footnote 45
Structural Frame Any 0 hr See Footnote #2
Exterior Struct Frame Any 0 hr See footnote #1
Shaft. Enclosure Any 1 :'r
Floor/Ceiling Assembly Any 0 hr See Foo7.:ioLe 42
Roof/Ceiling Assembly Any 0 hr See Footnote #2
Stairs Any None
NOTE: See Section 711 for shaft enclosure exceptions.
FOOTNOTES:
1) Elements in an exterior wall located where openings are not permitted
or where protection of openings is required, shall be protected
against ex`er::a1 fire exposure as required for exterior bearing walls
or tne structural frame, whichever is greater. -- Table 6-A, footnote 1
2) Sprinkler System has been used to substitute for 1 hr. ratings.
-- Sec.508. See Sec. 508 for exceptions.
5) Non -load-bearing walls within a tenant space that are not part cf a
1 hr. corridor may be o:
a) Noncombustible (non -rated) materials
b) Fire retardant -treated wood
c) One-hour construct.lon (any material) -- Sec. 601.5.2.1
3
Penetrat:ons of snaftL enclosures.
Excep:.ior.s:
1. Duct penetrations by steel exhaust air subducts
extending vertically upward at least 22 inches above
the top of the opening in a vented shaft where the
airflow is upward.
2. Penetrations of a fire -resistive floor forming the
base of a shaft enclosure may be protected by fire
dampers listed for installation in the horizontal
position.
3. Smoke dampers are not required when shaft is exhaust
only, and is used for continuously operating fans.
OCCUPANCY SEPARATIONS Table 3-3
B -A3 Ohr
B -M Ohr
B -S1 Ohr
B -S2 Chr
A3 -M Ohr
A3 -S: Ohr
A3 -S2 Ch-
M -S1 Ohr This separation is not required. Sec. 309.2.2. exc. 3
M -S2 Ohr This separation is not required. Sec. 309.2.2 exc. 3
S1-S2 lhr
BEATING EQUIPMENT SEPARATION:
A 1 hr. occupancy separation is required around Mechanical Room if it
contains a hciler or cen;.ral heating unit greater than 400,000 BTU input.
-- Sec. 302.E
EXIT REQUIREMENTS:
I'I. NAME NUMB MIN MIN PANIC HALLWAY/ DOOR NOTES
CCC EXITS W_LrH ?:DWR CORRIDOR SWING
2 Meeting Room 2 55 2 11.0 Yes Corridor Out 4 18
2 Meeting Room 1 34 1 6.8 No Hallway N/R
2 Womens :?C Restroom AC2 1 0.4 No Hallway N/R
2 Mens :ic Res`.room AC2 1 0.4 No Ha; lway N/R
2 Tramway Eng. Office 3 1 0.6 No Hallway N/R 11
2 Corporate Office 2 1 0.4 No Hallway N/R 11
2 Gln. Caverns Office 3 1 0.6 No Hallway N/R 11
2 Furniture Storage 0.0 No Hallway N/R
2 Non -habitable Area 0.0 No N/A _ N/R
TOTAL 97 2 29.1 Yes N/A Out
1 Retail Sales Room 43 1 B.6 No Hallway N/R
1 Tramway Control Room 1 1 0.2 No N/A N/R
1 Hers ::C Rest Rom. AC3 1 0.6 No Hallway N/R
1 Womens 1'C Rest Roo:r. AC3 1 0.6 No Hallway N/R
1 Dining Room 67 2 13.4 Yes Corridor Out 4 18
1 Snack Bar Serv. Arca 13 1 2.6 No Hallway N/R
Kitchen 2 1 0.4 No N/A N/R
I Non -habitable Area 0.0 No N/A N/R
TOTAL 126 2 25.2 Yes N/A Out
4
B) Enclosed usable space under the stars is required to 1e protected
as required fcr 1 hr. fare -resistive construction. -- Sec. 1003.3.3.9
Stairways are required to be in exit enclosures. Sec. 1005.3.3.1
Exception 1
1) T:e walls of the enclosure are required to be 1 hr fire assemblies.
- - Sec. 1005.3.3.2
2) The openings into the exit enclosure are required to be 1 hour
assemblies. Note: Openings into enclosure are limited to those
necessary for egress normally occupied spaces. Doors shall be
maintained self-closing or shall be automatic closing by actuation
of a smoke detector. -- Sec. 1005.3.3.5
3) A connection to the exterior is required with the same fire
protection as the exit enclosure. -- Sec. 1005.3.3.3
In Office buildings, 50 percent of the exits may discharge _hrougi: a
street -floor lobby when an automatic sprinkler system is provided on
the entire street level floor. -- Sec. 1005.3.3.3, Exception 2
4) The space under the stairs (enclosed or not) may no: be used for any
ca:pose. -- Sec. 1035.3.3.6
5) A barrier is required at grade level. -- Sec. 1005.3.3.4
RAMP REQUIREMENTS:
1) The minimum width is 44 inches. I_` a r.a:np serves an occupant load cf
49 or less, it may be 36 inches wide. Tf the ramp is serving a high
occupant load, check exit table above for required width.
- - Sec. .003.4.2
2) rf the ramp is part of the accessible rote, the maximum slope is
1:12. All other ramps may have a slope of 1:0 or less.
- - Sec. 1003.3.4.3
3) When the slope is greater. than 1:20, landings shall be provided at
the top, bottom and for each 5 .`eet cf rise. ?op landings and
intermediate landings shall he at least 5 feet in the direction of
travel. Landings at the bottom of ramps shall be at least 6 feet in
direction of travel. -- Sec. 1003.3.4.4
4) Handrails shall he per stair requirements. -- Sec. :003.3.4.5
5) The surface shall be roughened or shall be of slip -resistant
materials. -- Sec. 1003.3.4.8
LANDINGS AT DOORS:
1) A floor or '.anding shat: be provided on each side of doers. When
access for persons with disabilities is required. the floor or landing
shall not be more than 1/2 inch lower than the threshold. When access
:s not rea•,iired, the maximum is 1 inch. -- Sec. 1003.3.1.6
2; Landings shall have a width riot less than :he width of the stairway
or width of the doorway, whichever is the greater. Where a landing
serves an occupant load of 50 or more, doors in any position shall
not reduce the landing dimension to less than one half it required
width. The minimum length in •the direction of exit travel is 44 inches.
- - Sec. 1003.3.1.7
TRAVEL DISTANCE: ,distance to an exit)
The maximum travel distance in this building is 250 feet. -- Sec.
1004.2.5.2.3
Travel distance shall not be limited within an exit enclosure or exit
passageway. -- Sec. 1005.2.2
7
BUILDING ACCESS=BILITY:
_) This building including each ter.an: shall be provided with at least
one entrance which complies with the accessible route provisions of
CABO/ANSI A117.1. At Least 50 percent of all entrances shall be
aczess.bie. -- Sec. 1103.2.3
2) When :more that one exit is required from any accessible space, each
accessible portion of the space shall be served by not less than two
accessible means of egress. Sec. 1104.1.1
3) When an exit stairway is part of an accessible means of egress, the
:::airway sal1 have a clear width of not less than 48 inches between
the handrails. The stairway shall either incorporate an area of refuge
within an enlarged story -level landing or shall be accessed from
an area of refuge. -- Sec. 1:04.1.2
The area of refuge shall have direct access t.o the stairway that serves
it. -- Sec. 1104.2.1
4) Each area of refuge shall be sized to accommodate one wheelchair space
not less than 30 .inches by 48 inches for each 200 occupants, or
portion thereof. -- Sec. 1104.2.3
5) If the area of refuge is not within the stairway, it shall be separated
from the rest of the story by a smoke barrier having at least a one-
hour fire -resistance rating. Smoke barriers shall extend r.o the roof or
floor deck above. Doors shall be smoke and draft control assemblies
with a rating not less than 20 minutes. -- Sec. 1104.2.4
6) Two-way communications are required. -- Sec. 1104.2.5
7) Each area must be identified by a sign stating AREA OF REFUGE and the
international symbol. of accessibility. -- Sec. :104.2.7
8) NOTE: Exit stairways in buildings protected throughout by an approved
automatic sprinkler system are NOT required to incorporate an area of
refuge. -- Sec. :104.1.2, Exception 2
ROOFING REQUIREMENTS:
1) The roofing on this building is required to be Class C. -- Table 15-A
Exception 1
2.; See sect.ior. 1504 and 1C3O research reports for requirements.
3) Check with the Glenwood Springs Fire Department for any additional
requirements related to fire safety.
AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEMS:
If there are 100 or more sprinklers, ail valves controlling the
water supply and water -flow switches shall be electrically monitored.
Valve monitoring and water -flow alarm and trouble signals shall be
distinctly different and shall be automatically transmitted to an
approved centra: station, remote station or proprietary monitoring
station. -- Sec. 904.3.1
STANDPIPE REQUIREMENTS:
There is no requirement for a standpipe. -- Table 9-A
FOOTNOTES:
2) A standpipe is not required in the basement.. -- Table 9-A, footnote 1
VENTILATION:
All areas customarily occupied by humans shall be provided with natural
ventilation by means of openabie exterior openings with an area of not
less than 1/20 of the total floor area or shall be provided with a
mechanically operated ventilation system. S:.ch system shall be capable
off supplying a minimum of iS cubic feet per mi::.at:e of outside air per
occupant. -- Sec. 1202.2.1
8
WALL, AND CEILING FINISlt:
Wall and ceiling finish materials are requ_red to comply with
Sec. 804.1 and Table 8-B.
2) Carpeting on the ceiling is required to have a Class I flame
spread rating. -- Sec. 804.2
3) Textile wa_l coverings shall ::ave Class I flame spread rating.
and shall be protected by automatic sprinklers or meet the
acceptance criteria of U.B.C. Standard No. 8-2 -- Sec. 805
4) Toiler room floors shall have a smooth, hard nonabsorbent surface
that: extends upward onto the walls at least 5 inches.
- - Sec. 801.1.1
5) Walls within 2 feet of the front and sides of urinals and water
closets shall have a smooth, hard nonabsorbent surface.
- - Sec. 807.1.2
INSULATION NOTES:
1) All insulation material including facings are required to have a
`lame -spread rating of 25 or less and a maximum smoke density of 450
unless it is in a concealed space and the facing is in contact with
a wall or ceiling. -- Sec. 707.3 exc.2
2) Foam plastic insulations are required to be protected. Sec. 2602
ADCC T IONA . REQUIREMENTS:
For B occupancy
For A3 occupancy
F'icor-ist Occupancy -Dining Room
When seats are not fixed, the capacity of this area is required to
be posted at 67 occupants in a conspicuous place on an approved
sign near the main exit. -- Sec. 1007.2.6
Floor -2nd Occupancy -Meeting Room 2
When seats are not fixed, the capacity of this area is required to
be posted at 55 occupants in a conspicuous place on an approved
sign near the main exit. -- Sec. 1007.2.6
ACCESSIBLE FACII,_TIES:
NOTE: Except a:: noted, section numbers listed below are from
CABO/ANSI A117.1 - 1992 and the companion Correction Report
references the 1998 edition of the A111.1 standard. The
requirements in both of these editions are the same however, the
1998 provides for clarification.
WATER FOUNTAINS AND WATER COOLERS:
At least 50 percent of drinking fountains, but not less than one,
provided on every floor shall be accessible. -- UBC Sec. 1105.4.1
Accessible units must comply with the following:
1) Spout is to be within 36 inches of the floor. -- Sec. 4.15.2.1
2) Spout arranged for parallel approach shall he located 3 inches
maximum from the front. edge. Spouts of cantilevered u:_ts with
:<nee and toe clearances shall be located 15 inches m'..nimun from
the vertical support and 5 inches maximum from the front edge.
-- Sec. 4.15.2.2
3) Spouts shall provide a flow of water 4 inches height minimum.
-- Sec. 4.15.2.3
9
4) Operable parts shall be located at or near the front edge of the
uni: and shall comply with 4.25.4 -- Sec. 4.15.3
5) A cantilevered unit is required to extend 17 inches minimum from
the vertical support. Clear knee space must provide a clear area
of 8 inches in depth at 27 inches high ani 11 'inches at 9 inches
minimum above the floor. -- Sec. 4.15.4.1
6) Forward approach units shall comply with 4.2. Units in alcoves
shall comply with 4.2.4.4. Units not having the necessary knee
and Loe clearance or clear space under them shall comply with
4.2.4 a:.d have a clear floor space that allows a person in a
wheelchair to make a parallel approach. -- Sec. 4.15.4.2
To.'..FT FACI'_.ITIES: (Refer tc Correct_or. Report for required corrections
o: toilet and bathing facilities)
1) A 60 inch diameter unobstructed turning space is required in
the toilet room. -- Sec. 4.16.3, 4.2.3 & 1'ig. B4.2.3
2) Water closet shall be mounted adjacent to a side wall or
partition. The distance from. the side wail or partition to the
centerline of Lhe water closet shall be 18 in. Sec. 4.17.1
3) When the accessible water closet is not in a stall:
T`:e clear floor space shall be 48 in minimum in front
of the water closet and 42 in from the center line of the
water closet on the side not adjacent to the wall.
-- Sec. 4.17.2 & Fig. B4.17.2
4) When the accessible water closet is in a stall:
The stall shall he 60 in wide minimum and 56 in deep minimum
for wall hung water closets and 59 in deep minimum for floor
mounted water. closets. -- Sec. 4.18.3.1
:£ h e door swings into the stall, the required depth shall
be increased by 36 inches minimum. -- Sec. 4.18.3.2 &
Fig. B4.18.3.1
5) The bars are to be 33 to 36 inches above the floor and shall
be provided or. the rear wall and on :^.e side wall closest to
the water closet. -- Sec. 4.24.2.2 & Figs. P4.:7.3, 1.34.17.4
and B4.18.3.1
a) Side grab bar is required to start within 12 inches of the
back wall and extend to ):4 inches from the tack wall. (The
minimum length of the bar is 42 in) -- Sec. 4.17.4.1 &
Figs. B4.17.3 and B4.18.3.1
b) The rear bar shall he 24 in long minimum, centered on the
water closet. Where space permits, the bar shall be 36 i
long minimum, with the additional length provided on the
transfer side. -- Sec. 4.17.4.2 & Figs. B4.17.3, B4.17.4
and B4.18.3.1
6) The :op of t.he seat on the water closet is required to be 17
to 19 inches above .:e floor. -- Sec. 4.17.3 & Fig. B4.17.3
7) Accessible urinals shall be of the stall type or wall hung with
the rim at 17 inches maximum above the floor. -- Sec. 4.19.2
8) A clear area of 30 X 48 inches minimum is required in front
of the urinal. Privacy shields shall not extend beyond the
front edge of the urinal rim, unless they are 30 inches apart
minimum. -- Sec. 4.19.3
9) Accessible lavatories shad be mounted with the rim 34 inches
maximum above the floor and a clearance of 29 inches minimum
from the floor to the bottom of the front edge of the apron.
-- Sec. 4.20.2.1 & Fig. 134.20.3.1
10
10) it shall extend 17 inches minimum from the wall. The clear knee
space shall be 8 inches in depth minimum at 23 ::aches min `.:n°am
above the floor and 11 inches in depth minimum at 9 in minimum
above the floor. The dip of the overflow shall be ignored when
checking the cleara:aces. -- Sec. 4.20.3.1 & Fig. B4.20.3.1
11) A clear floor space of 30 X 48 arches r.iaim;m shall be provided
in front of the lavatory and shall extend 19 inches maximum
under the lavatory. -- Sec. 4.20.3.2 & Fig. 84.20.3.2.
12) Water supply and dra'.n pipes under lavatories shall be
insulated or otherwise treated to protect_ against contact.
-- Sec. 4.20.4
13) The bottom of mirror is required to be within 38 inches of
the floor. -- Sec. 4.16.6 & Fig. E4.20.3.1
GLAZING REQUIREMENTS
All glazing in hazardous locations is required to be of safety
glazing material. -- Sec. 2406.3 & 2406.4
Locations:
• Glazing in ingress and egress doors except jalousies.
• Glazing in fixed and sliding panels of sliding door assemblies
and paneis in swinging doors other that: wardrobe doors.
• Glazing in storm doors.
• Glazing in all unframed swinging doors.
• Glazing in doors and enclosures for hot tubs, whirlpools, saunas,
steam rooms, bathtubs and showers. Glazing in any per=ion of a
building wail enclosing these compartments where the bottom exposed
edge of the glazing is less than 60 inches above a standing surface
and drain inlet.
• Giazir.q in Fixed or operable panels adjacent to a door where the
nearest exposed edge of the glazing is w:Lh n a 24 -inch arc of
either vertical edge of the door in a closed position and where the
bottom exposed edge of the glazing is less than 60 inches above the
walking surface.
• Glazing in an individual fixed or operable panel, other than those
locations described in items 5 and 6 above, than meets all of the
following conditions:
A. Exposed area of an individual pane greater than 9 square feet.
B. Exposed bottom edge less than 18 inches above the floor.
C. Exposed top edge greater than 36 inches above the floor.
D. One or more walking surfaces within 36 inches horizontally of
the plane of the glazing.
• Glazing in walls enclosing stairway landings or within 5 feet of
:.hen bottom and top of s:.arways where the bottom edge is less
than 60 Inches above the walking surface.
11
•
•
Hougland & Associates
5616 County Road 100
Carbondale, CO 81623
Ph/Fax (97C 963-2312 -E-mail = `iresafe@ro=.net
Correction Report eased on
the 1997 Edition of the Uniform Building Code
Project Number: GarCo06.02
Project Name: Glenwood Tramway Company
Address: Tramway Upper Terminal
Contractor: STP Enterprise
Designer: Tramway Engineering, LTD
Engineer: Charles Roger Peterson :7809
Occupancy: A3, B, M, Si & S2
Construction: V-1hr
Report 3y: Art. Hougland
Date: July 2, 2002
NOTE: The code items listed in this report are not intended to be a
complete listing of all possible code requirements in the 1997 UBC.
It is a guide to selected sections of the code.
Portions of the material contained in this program are reproduced
from the Uniform Building Code published by the International Conference
of Building Officials.
Notice:
The review of pians and specifications does no: constitute an acceptance of any
responsibility by Hougland & Associates for errors, omissions or discrepancies.
The responsibility for these items and implementation during construction rests
specifically with the architect, engineers, designers, builders and owner.
Comments and notations are intended to to c:onstr.uctve and in support of the
owners interest.
4 SHEET IDENTIFICAT:ON CORRECTION REQUIRED
1 G. Overflow Drains: Provide overflow drains or scuppers. Drains are
indicated on the plan but overflow drains or
scuppers are r.ct. -- Sec. :506.2 & Sec. 1506.3
2 P3 Safety glazing: Glazing in a hazardous location is required to
be glazed with safety material. Not all areas required
tc have safety glazing are indicated on the window or
door schedule. -- Sec. 2406.3 & Sec. 2406.4
3 General Fire Sprinkler System: The application indicates that the
building will be protected by a complete automatic
fire sprinkler system. Plans arc tc be provided to
the Glenwood Springs Fire Department for approval --
Sec. 904.2.1
4 P1>P3 Pa:i:c Hardware: Provide panic hardware on the doors providing
exiting from Teeing room 2. Door mark <4> is
indicated to swing in the wrong direction-- Sec.
1007.2..5
1
1
5 P1>P3 Occupant Loads: The plans indicate the maximum occupant load of
all assembly areas and these are to be posted prior
to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy. -- Sec.
1007.2.6
6 P3 Occupancy Separations: The occupancy separation between The S: and
S2 storage areas is required to be of one -hoar
construction. -- Table 3-B & Sec. 302.3
7 P3 '.PG System: Mechanical room In the basement. where LFG is used
as fuel Ls ::c have a method for the safe
collection, removal and containment or disposal of
the fuel or vapor that is approved by the Building
Official. - Section. 304.5 of 1997 Uniform
Mechanical Code
3 P3
Mechanical Room: If the largest piece of fuel equipment exceeds
400,000 Btu per hour the room is to be separated from
the remainder of the building by one-hour fire -
resistive construction
9 P9 Exterior Walls: The exterior walls are to be of one-hour
fire -resistance rating. The plans or the
information received on June 27th do not indicate a
listed assembly or a research report specific to the
"Thermoformed" system indicated to be used. Item 1
under Reinforced Masonry Walls does not appear to be
consistent with the "Thermoformed" system indicated to
be used elsewhere on the plans. -- Table 5-A
10 P1>P3
11 P3
Shaft Construction: Shaft construction is required to be a 1
hour assembly. -- Table 6-A
,:seab.e Space Under Floor The unexcavated crawl space cn the
ower floor cannot be useable space for storage o
anything unless also provided with an automatic fire
sprinkler or constructed with a one-hour
fire -resistive floor ceiling assembly between the
first story and the basement. -- Sec. 712
12 P3 Basement Exits: The basement floor is required to have 2 exits.
-- Sec. 1004.2.3.2 From individual floors. See
Correction 24 addressing the stair enclos=e. The
second ext. appears to be :::tended to go up the
stairs, down the hallway and through the restaurant
or the retail space to exit the building. Once
persons have entered the exit enclosure as part of
'The Exit" they are to he within the ext anti:
discharged to a public way. Sec. 1005.1. This can be
accomplished within a corridor but not through a
hallway or other intervening rooms such as the
restaurant: or retail areas.
2
•
•
13 P1>P3 Exii.i:.g:
14 71>P3
The Ma_: Floor (First Story) exiting appears to work
for the Retail space with a single exit.. The
restaurant has appropriate exiting except that
sliding doors cannot be used unless they are the type
that swing cut when pushed on. This floor also has
the problem with the u::enc.osed stair presently
designed to be opened to all floors. The Upper Floor
(Second Story)exiting like the others has a problem
with the unenclosed stair. In addition, per Sec.
1004.2.3.2 every ccc4oant on this floor is :o have
access to not less than two exits. The current:
design does not provide for two complying exits. The
requirements of Sec. 1004 Exit Access and Sec. A05
The Exit must be complied with in the design of the
exiting system.
Exit Separation: Sec. 1004.2..4 Separation of exits or exit access
doorways is to be complied with in the design of the
exiting system.
15 71>P3 Travel distance: Sec. 1004.2.5.2 Travel distance is tc be
complied with in the design of the exiting system.
16 P5>P8 Landings: Provide a landing on both sides of doors. Note: The
step & size requirements. -- Sec. 1003.3.1.6
17 P2 Double Boors: Note: Manually operated edge or surface -mounted
flush bolts on the double doors indicated to be exits
are prohibited. -- Sec. 1003.3.1.8
_8 71
19 P1>P3
20 P1>P3
Door Swing: The doors from Meeting Room 2 are required to swing
in the direction of exit travel, door <4> is
.indicated to swing incorrectly. -- Sec. 1003.3.1.5
Stair Rise & Run: The maximum rise of a step is 7 inches and the
minimum tread is 11 inches. -- Sec. 1003.3.3.3 \o
information was found to verity
Handrails: A handrail is required along a stairway. It is
required to be 34 Lc 38 inches above :.tie nosing of
the steps and if the side is open, the maximum size
of an opening in the railing at the stairway is 4
inches. -- Sec. 1003.3.3.6 & Sec. 509.3
21 P8 Stair Guardrails: 42 inch high guardrails in addition to the
handrails are required where step is greater than 30
inches to floor or grade below. A maximum opening of
4 inches is reqired. The exterior stairs are
indicated with a 36 inch high guardrail. -- Sec. 509
22 P3 U:.derstair Space: The enclosed usable space under the stairs is
required to be protected by 1 hr. fire -resistive
construction. -- Sec. 1003.3.3.9
3
•
23 P8 Openings in Railings: The maxim= size of an opening in the
railing at the stairway and on guardrails is 4
inches. -- Sec. 1003.3.3.7 & Sec. 509.3
24 P1>P3
Stair E:ic1os.,re: The interior stairs are required to be enclosed
per Sec. 1005.3.3. Once persons have entered the
exit enclosure as part of 'The Exit" they are to be
within the exit until discharged to a public way.
Sec. 1005.1
25 General Building Accessibility: Provide access to all building levels for
the physically disabled. -- Sec. 1103.0 & 1104.0
26 P1>P3
Accessible Toilets & Showers: Sec. 1105.2 requires that each
toilet room in this building be accessible and at
least one type of fixture or element in each toilet
room be accessible. This section also requires that
when bat:ir.g facilities are provided, a! least one of
each type of mixture or eiemen` shall be provided.
This section provides that in recreational
facilities, where separate sex bathing facilities are
provided, an accessible un:sex bathing room shall be
provided. My icterpre`ation is that the Lower Floor
restroom's and bathing facilities are to be
accessible.
27 P3 Toilets & Showers: CABO/ANSI A1:7.1-1998, Sections 604 & 608.
The June 27 fax sent Lo me of _^e Main Leve: Bathrooms
appears to comply with Section 604 for the accessible
toilet compartments. however, the tipper Level
Bathrooms indicate a clear space of 4 -feet 8 -inch in
width and 60 -inches is :.he minimum.
28 P1>P3
29 P1>P3
30 P1>P3
Water Closet Height: The top of accessible water closet seats
shall be 17 in to 19 in above the floor. --
CABO/ANSI A117.1 Sec. 604.4 & Fig. 604.4
Lavatory Height: Provide the required 29 inch height, 30 inch
clear width, & 17 inch clear depth under at least
one lavatory. -- CABO/ANSI_ A117.1 Sec. 606.3 & Fig.
606.3
Mirror Height: Provide at least one mirror with the bottom edge of
the reflecting surface within 40 inches of the floor.
-- CABO/ANSI A117.: Sec. 6C3.3
4
r
•
GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING
970-945-8212
MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS
FOR
CONSTRUCTION OF
COMMERCIAL OR MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS
including
NEW CONSTRUCTION
ADDITIONS
ALTERATIONS
and
MOVED BUILDINGS
In order to understand the scope of the work intended under a permit application and expedite
the is.^uance of a permit it is important that complete information be provided. Adequate and
complete information will prevent delays in the plan review process. Reviewing a plan and the
discovery that required information has not been provided by the applicant may result in the delay
of the permit issuance and in proceeding with building construction. The owner or contractor
may be required to provide this information before the plan review may proceed. This causes
delays because other plans that are in line for review may be given attention before the new
information may be reviewed after it has been provided to the Building Department.
Please review this document to determine if you have enough information to design your
project and provide adequate information to facilitate a plan review. If you do not, it may
be helpful to obtain a book titled "Dwelling Construction Under the Uniform Building
Code". This book is available to you through this department at our cost. Also, please
consider using a design professional for assistance in your design and a construction
professional for construction of your project.
To provide for a more understandable plan in order to determine compliance with the building,
plumbing and mechanical codes, applicants are requested to review the following checklist prior
to and during design.
1
Plans to be included for a Building Permit must be on draft paper at least 18"x 24"" and drawn to
scale.
Plans must include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevat ons all sides with
decks, balcony steps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the finish grade
line. A section showing in detail, from the bottom of the footing to the top of the roof including
re -bar, anchor bolts, pressure treated plates, floor joists, wall studs and spacing, insulation,
sheeting, house -rap, (which is required), siding or any approved building material.
A window schedule. A door schedule.
A floor framing plan, a roofing framing plan, roof must be designed to withstand a 40 pound per
square foot. up to 7,000 feet in elevation, an 80 M.P.H. windshear, wind exposure B, windload of
15 pounds per square foot and a 36 inch frost depth.
All sheets to be identified by number and indexed. All of the above requirements must be met or
your plans will be returned.
All plans submitted must be incompliance with the 1997 UBC, UMC and 1997 UPC.
Applicants are required to indicate appropriately and to submit completed checklist at time
of application for a permit:
1. Is a site plan included that identifies the location of the proposed structure, additions or
other buildings, setback easements, and utility easements showing distances to the
property lines from each comer of the proposed structure prepared by a licensed surveyor
and has the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing? Slopes of 40% or
more on properties must be show on site plan.
Yes Ni
2. Does the site plan when applicable include the location of the I.S.D.S. (Individual Sewage
Disposal System) and distances to the property lines, wells (on subject property and
adjacent properties), streams or water courses? This information must be certified by a
licensed surveyor with their signature and professional stamp on the design.
Yes N, No Not necessary for this project
3. Are the plans submitted for application construction drawings and not drawings that are
stamped or marked identifying them as "Not for construction, for permit issuance only",
"Approval drawings only", "For permit issuance only" or similar language?
Yes \4 No Not necessary for this project
2
4. Is the I.S.D.S. (individual Sewage Disposal System) designed, stamped and signed by a
Colorado Registered Engineer?
Yes V No Not necessary for this project
S. Does the site plan indicate the location and direction of the State, County or private road
accessing the property?
Yes V
6. Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all
reinforcing steel in accordance with the uniform building code or per stamped engineered
desi
Yes No Not necessary for this project
7. If the building is a pre-engineered structure, is there a stamped, signed engineered
foundation plan for this building?
Yes No Not necessary for this project
8. Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl
spaces and the clearances required between wood and earth?
Yes No Not necessary for project
9. Do the plans indicate the size and location of the ventilation openings for the attic, roof
joist spaces and soffits?
Yes No Not necessary for this project \ _
10. Do the plans include design loads as required under the Uniform Building Code for roof
snowloads, (a minimum of 40 pounds per square foot in Garfield County)?
Yes Ni No Not necessary for this project
11. Do the plans include design loads as required for floor loads under the Uniform Building
Code Chapter 16 and Tables 16A, 16B and 16C? .
YesNI No Not necessary for this project
12. Does the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor, and
roff construction?
YesNi No Not necessary for this project
13. Is t e wind speed and exposure design included in the plan?
Yes No Not necessary for this project
14. Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists, wall studs,
ceiling joists, roof rafters or joists or trusses?
3
•
4
Yes \ No Not necessary for this project
15. Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method of positive
connection of all columns and beams?
Yes \ No Not necessary for this project
16. Does the plan indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the highest
point of the building or addition measured at mid span between the ridge and the eave
down to existing grade contours?
Yes N No Not necessary for this project
17. Does the plan include any stove or zero clearance fireplace planned for installation
including make and model and Colorado Phase II certifications or Phase II EPA
certification?
Yes No Not necessary for this project
18. Does the plan include a masonry fireplace including a fireplace section indicating design to
comply with the Uniform Building Code Chapter 31?
Yes No Not necessary for this project \
19. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that egress/rescue windows
from sleeping rooms and/or basements comply with the requirements of the Uniform
Bu.king Code?
Yes N No Not necessary for this project
20. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that windows provide
natural light and ventilation for all habitable rooms?
Yes N No Not necessary for this project
21. Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass doors,
glazing immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used
as a walking surface; sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub
enclosures and specify safety glazing for these areas?
Yes No Not necessary for this project
22. Do the plans include a complete design for all mechanical systems planned for installation
in this building? n
Yes No Not necessary for this project (aodc.g.pTu w . �1
23. Have all areas in the building been accurately identified for the intended use? (Occupancy
as identified in the Uniform Building Code Table 5-A)
Yes _ No Not necessary for this project
4
4
24. Does the plan indicate the quantity, form, use and storage of any hazardous materials that
may be in use in this building?
Yes No Not necessnry for this project
25. Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces, boilers and water heaters
indicated on the plan?
Yes V No Not necessary for this project
26. Do the plans indicate the location and dimension of restroom facilities and if more than
four employees and both sexes are employed, facilities for both sexes?
Yes N No Not necessary for this project
27. Do the plans indicate that restrooms and access to the building are handicapped
accessible?
Yes No Not necessary for this project
28. Have two (2) complete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the application?
Yes NI No
29. Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other
construction code requirements?
Yes No Not necessary for this project
30. Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a
inspection by the Garfield County Building Department?
No ?k4sG EScQ111
31. Do you understand that approval for design and/or construction changes are required
prior to the implementation of these changes?
Yes No
32. Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a "Pian Review" fee from
you at the time of application and that you will be required to pay the "Permit" fee as well
as any "Septic System" or "Road Impact" fees required, at the time you pick up
your building permit?
Yes NA No
33. Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the Uniform
Building Code including approval on a final inspection prior_ to receiving a Certificate of
Occupancy and occupancy of the building?
Yes' No
5
34. Are you aware that the person signing the Permit Application whether the "Owner",
"Agent of the Owner", "General Contractor", "Contractor" or otherwise, signing the
application is the party responsible for the project complying with the Uniform Codes?
Yes N No
35. Are you aware that twenty-four (24) hour notice is required for all inspections?
Inspections will be made from Battlement Mesa to West Glenwood in the mornings
and from Glenwood Springs to Carbondale, in the afternoon. Morning inspections
must be called in by 12:00 p.m. the day before; afternoon inspections must be called
in by 4:00 p.m. the day before. Failure to give twenty-four (24) hour notice for
inspections will delay your inspection one (1) day. Inspections are to be called in to
384-5003.
36. Are you aware that prior to issuance of a building permit you are required to show proof
of a driveway access permit or obtain a statement from the Garfield County Road &
Bridge Department stating one is not necessary? You can contact the Road & Bridge
Department at 625-8601.
Yes \ No
37. Do you understand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed
Electrician and Plumber to perform installations and hookups? The license number will be
required at time of inspection.
Yes ' No
38. Are you aware, that on the front of the building permit application you will need to fill in
the Parcel/ Schedule Number for the lot you are applying for this permit on prior to
issuance of the building permit? Your attention in this is appreciated.
Yes No
I hereby acknowledge that I have read, understand, and answered these questions to
the best of my ability.
Signature
6
Date
W ..
• .. 0
Phone: (1.7c;) 945. Z-2•16 (days); (c c) et 5 - 71G3 (evenings)
Project Name: GLENwocit> ti+mw, \[ c rtc2 S CE 'r 2
Project Address: S z Lam t O ) S Ec 4-, T 6 S.� getW., G
If you answered "No" on any of these questions you may be required to provide this information
at the request of the Building Official prior to beginning the plan review process. Delays in
issuing the permit are to be expected. Work may not proceed without the issuance of the permit.
*If you have answered "Not necessary for this project" on any of the questions and it is
determined by the Building Official that the information is necessary to review the application and
plans to determine minimum compliance with the adopted codes, please expect the following:
A. The application may be placed behind more recent applications for building permits in the
review process and not reviewed until required information has been provided and the application
rotates again to first position for review.
B. Delay in issuance of the permit.
C. Delay in proceeding with construction.
*If you answered "No" to this question the circumstances described in the question could result in
a "Stop Work Order" being issued or a "Certificate of Occupancy" not being issued.
Bpcomm
04/02
7
Page 1 of
v •
•, 4
Steve Hackett
From: Steve Hackett
Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2002 10:49 AM
To: Mark Bean
Cc: Fred Jarman; Andy Schwaller
Subject: Building Permit Approval -Glenwood Tramway CO
I met with Charles Peterson and Andy this moming to resolve our questions about 'Project Staging', shown as
item 3 on sheet P4 of the approved plans for this project. An amendment to item 3 has been written and
signed by Mr. Peterson and myself which states that "all of the work shown on the approved plans will be
complete as shown with the exception of future tenant improvement interior non structural space separations
which will be future tenant responsibility'.
Further, I brought it to Mr. Peterson's attention that item A.1.m, Special Use Permit conditions of approval,
requires completion of construction of the tram and visitors center by December 31, 2002, which does not
seem to be a realistically achievable production schedule.
Steve
8/8/2002
Hougland & Associates
5616 County Road 100
Carbondale, CO 81623
?h/Fax (970) 963-2312 - E-mail = firesaf.e@ro`.net
Correction Report based on
the 1997 Edition of the Uniform Building Code
Pro,ect Number: GarCoO6.02
Project Name: G_enwood Tramway Company
Address: Tramway Upper 4erminal
Contractor: STP Enterprise F,,A
Designer: Tramway Engineering, LTD 1"4
i.gineer: Charles Roger Peterson 17809 Construction: V-lhr '10
()2' lk 141'
Occupancy: A3, B, M, Si & S2 t/Soo#A
Report Ey: Art Hougland(2.310001e'
'+_��
�
i] Qo'1"
NOTE: The code items listed in this report are not intended to be a V
complete listing of all possible code requirements in the 1997 UBC.
It is a guide to selected sections of the code.
Date: Jury 2, 2002
Portions of the material contained in this program are reproduced
from the Uniform Building Code published by the International Conference
of Buiid'rig Cffcials.
No�_ce:
The review of Dans and specifications does not c.cnsticut.e an ac:cepcar:ce of any
responsibility by Hougland & Associates for errors, omissions or discrepancies.
The responsibility for these items and implementation during construction rests
specifically with the architect, engineers, designers, hui_ders and owner.
Comments and notations are intended to be constructive and in support of the
owners interest.
?? SHEET IDENTIFICATION CORRECTION REQUIRED
1 G2 Overflow Drains: Provide overflow drains or scuppers. Drains are
indicated on the plan but overflow drains or,,,S,4ia
scuppers are not. -- Sec. 1506.2 & Sec. 1506.35Wt c„r„.
Alm %) -l3.43
2 P3 Safety glazing: Glazing in a hazardous location is required to
be glazed with safety material. Not all areas required
to have safety glazing are 'ndicated on the window or
door schedule. -- Sec. 2406.3 & Sec. 2406.4
3 General Fire Sprinkler System: The application indicates that the
building will be protected by a complete automatic
fire sprinkler system. Plans are to be provided to
the Glenwood Springs Fire Department for approval --
Sec. 904.2.1
4 P1>P3
Panic Hardware: Provide panic hardware on the doors providing
exiting from meeting room 2. Door mark <4> :s
indicated to swing in the wrong direction-- Sec.
1007.2.5
1
•
5 P1>P3 Occupant Loads: The plans indicate the maximum occupant load of
all assembly areas and these are to be posted prior
to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy. -- Sec.
1007.2.6 n
S Zi r � 9� Pca •Lc rst)
6 P3 Occupancy Separations: The occupancy separation between The Si and
S2 storage areas is required _(-; be c: one-hour
construction. -- Table 3-B & Sec. 302.3 'Du, ,q SI iN
4.000 MU-' 03
7 P3 LPG System: Mechanical room in the basement where L?G is used
as fuel is _c have a method tor the safe
7-0-41S collection, removal and containment or disposal of
the fuel or vapor that is approved by the Building
t -Y Official. - Section: 304.5 cf 1997 Uniform
164 Mechanical Code
8 P3
Mechanical
pie 144 ).
Room: If the largest piece of fuel equipment exceeds
400,000 Btu per hour the room is to be separated from
e remainder of the building by one-hour fire-
resst.ive cor.str.:c::ior
9 P9 Exterior Walls: The exterior walls are to be of one-hour 40Q-zzrpt,
fire -resistance rating. The plans or the ,,,pori
c Q information. received on June 27th do ::o_ indicate a
J> 1��- �°�' listed assembly or a research report specific to theme
ey "Thermoformed" system indicated to be used. Item 13�si4/411
f
�Aaty ,t, under Reinforced Masonry Walls does not appear to befpil„.„
StrSTF0/3 consistent with the "Thermoformed" system indicated t
Illbeused elsewhere on the plans. -- Table 5-A '
10 P1>P3 Shaft Construction: Shaft construction is required to be a 1 Oevia
hour assembly. -- Table 6-A
11 P3 Useable Space Under Floor The unexcavated crawl space on the
:ower floor cannot be useable spare for storage of
anything unless also provided with an automatic fire
sprinkler or constructed with a one-hour
fare -resistive floor ceiling assembly between the
first story and the basement. -- Sec. 7:2
12 P3
•
Basement Exits: The basement floor is required to have 2 exits.
-- Sec. 1004.2.3.2 From individual floors. See
Correction 24 addressing the stair enclosure. The
second exit appears to be intended to go up t:he
stairs, down the hallway and through the restaurant
or the retail space to exit the building. Once
persons have entered the exit enclosure as part: of
"The Exit" they are to be within the exit until
discharged to a public way. Sec. I005.1. This can be
accomplished within a corridor but not through a
hallway or other intervening rooms such as the
restaurant or retail areas.
2
13 P1>P3 Exiting:
• S3-4 R'i,J is o f-,440
r•-
14 P:>P3
The Main Floor (First Story) exiting appears Lo work
for the Retail space with a single exit. The
restaurant has appropriate exiting except that
sliding doors cannot be used unless they are the type
that swing out when pushed o::. This floor also has
t`:e problem with the unenclosed stair presently
designed to be opened to all floors. The Upper Floor
(Second SLory)exiling like the others has a problem
with the unenclosed stair. In addition, per Sec.
1004.2.3.2 every occupant on :h'..s floor is to have
access to not less than two exits. The current
design does not provide for two complying exits. The
requirements of Sec. 1004 Exit Access and Sec. :305
The Exit must be compled with to e design of the
exiting system.
Exit Separation: Sec. 1004.2.4 Separation of exits or exit access
doorways is to be complied with in the design: of the
exiting system.
15 Pl>P3 Travel distance: Sec. 1004.2.5.2 Travel distance is to be
complied with in the design: of the exiting system.
16 P5>P8
Landings: Provide a landing on both sides of doors. Note: The
step & size requirements. -- Sec. 1003.3.1.6
17 P2 Double Doors: Note: Manually operated edge or surface-nojnted
flash bolts on the double doers indicated to be exits
are prohibited. -- Sec. 1003.3.1.8
• 18 P=
19 Pl>i?3
20 P1>P3
Doer Swing: The doors from Meeting Room 2 are required to swing
in the d'. recr.ior. of exit travel., door <4> Is
indicated to swing incorrectly. -- Sec. 1003.3.1.5
Stair Rise & Run: The maximum rise of a step is 7 inches and the
minimum tread is 11 inches. -- Sec. 1003.3.3.3 No
information was found to verify
Handrafl.s: A handrail is required along a stairway. It is
recuiled to be 34 to 38 inches above the rostng of
the steps and if the side is open, the maximum size
of an opening in the railing at the stairway is 4
inches. -- Sec. 1003.3.3.6 & Sec. 509.3
21 P8 Stair Guardrails: 42 inch high guardrails in addition to the
handrails are required where step is greater than 30
inches to floor or grade below. A r.axim.:m opening of
4 inches is required. The exterior stairs are
indicated with a 36 inch high guardrail. -- Sec. 509
2.2 P3 Understai= Space: The enclosed usable space under the stars is
required to be protected by 1 hr. fire -resistive
construction. -- Sec. 1003.3.3.9
3
i
•
•
23 P8 Openings in Railings: The maximum size of an opening in the
railing at t:.e stairway and on guardrails :s 4
inches. -- Sec. 1003.3.3.7 & Sec. 509.3
24 P:>?3 Stair Enclosure: The anterior stairs are required to be enclosed
per Sec. 1C05.3.3. Once persons ::ave entered the
exit enclosure as part of 'The Exit" they are to be
itt44 within the exit until discharged to a public way.
Sec. 1C05.1
f -! kf24. DtArcot Y{ . itefrk, l E! Al k���l�i a AM/
25 General Building Accessibility: Provide access to all building leveisi��o Z
the physically disabled. -- Sec. 1103.0 & 1104.0
26 P:>?3
Accessible Toilets & Showers: Sec. 1105.2 requires that each
toilet room :n tis building be accessible and at
least one type of fixture or element in each toilet
room be accessible. This section also requires that
when bathing facilities are provided, at least one o=
each type of fixture or element shall be provided.
This section provides that in recreational
facilities, where separate sex bathing facilities are
provided, an accessible unisex bathing room shah be
provided. My interpretation is that the tower Floor
restroom's and bathing facilities are to be
accessible.
21 P3 Toilets & Showers: CABO/ANSI A1:7.1-1998, Sections 604 & 608.
The June 27 fax sent to me of :he Main Love. Bathrooms
appears to comply with Section 604 for the accessible
toilet compartments. However, the Upper Level
Bathrooms indicate a clear space of 4 -feet 6 -inch in
width and 60 -inches is the minimum..
28 131>P3
29 P1>P3
30 P1>P3
Water Closet Height: The top of accessible water closet seats
shall be I7 in Lo 19 in above the floor. ---
CARO/ANS- A117.1 Sec. 604.4 & Fig. 604.4
Lavatory Height: Provide the required 29 inch height, 30 inch
clear width, & 17 inch clear depth under at least
one Lavatory. -- CABO/ANS: A117.1 Sec. 606.3 & Fig.
606.3
Mirror Height: Provide at: least one mirror with the bottom edge of
the reflecting surface within 40 inches of the floor.
-- CABO/ANS: A117.1 Sec. 603.3
4
•
•
•
Hougland & Associates
5616 County Road 100
Carbondale, CO 8162.3
Ph/Eax (970) 963-2312 - E-mail = firesafe@rof.;.et
Plan analysis based on
the 1997 Edition of the Uniform Building Code
Project Number: GarCo06.02
Project Name: Glenwood Tramway Company
Address: Tramway Upper Terminal
Contractor: STP Enterprise
Designer: Tramway Engineering, LTD
Engineer: Charles Roger Peterson 17809
Occupancy: A3, B w S1 & S2
Construction:
Report. By: Art yougland
Date: September 25, 2002
Analysis iia
NOTE: The code items listed in this report are not intended to be a
complete listing of all possible code requirements in the 1997 UBC.
It is a guide to selected sections of the code.
Portions of the material contained in this program are reproduced
from the Uniform Building Code published by the International Conference
of Building Officials.
Notice:
The review of plans and specifications does not constitute an acceptance of any
responsibility by Hougland & Associates for errors, omissions or discrepancies.
The responsibility for these items and implementation during construction rests
specifically with the architect, engineers, designers, builders and owner.
Comments and notations are intended to be constructive and in support of the
owners interest.
NFPA 13 sprinkler system throughout the building
Sprinkler system used for 1 hr. substitution -- Sec. 508
SEPARATION
DIRECTION BOUNDARY AREA INCREASE FIRE PROTECTION
NORTH Property line 500.0 Feet 500.0 Feet
EAST Property line 300.0 Feet 500.0 Feet
SOUTH Property line 500.0 Feet 500.0 Feet
WEST Property line 500.0 Feet 500.0 Feet
Allowable area increased 100.% for open area on 4 sides.
-- Sec. 505.1
•
•
•
FL, NAME OCC MAX FLR AREA ALLOWED RATTO STATUS
2 Meeting Room 2 A3
2 Meeting Room 1 B
2 Womens HC Restroom B
2 Mens IIC Restroom E3
2 Tramway Eng. Office B
2 Corporate Office B
2 Gin. Caverns Office B
2 Furniture Storage S1
2 Non -habitable Area B
TOTAL FOR FLOOR
1
1
1
1
1
1
Retail Saes Room
Tramway Con:.ao1 Room
Mens HC Rest Room
Womens HC Rest Room
Dining Room
Snack Bar Serv. Area
Kitchen
Non -habitable Area
TOTAL FOR FLOOR
B1
Bi
B1
BI
131
B1
B1
B1
Bl
B1
B1
M
B
B
B
A3
B
B
B
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
Staff Lounge
Caving Managers
Wild Tour Hq.
Rest. Storage Rm
Retaii Scoraae
Mechanical Room
Men's HC Rest Room
Guides Men's Shower
Womens HC Rest Room
Guides womens Shower
Non -habitable Area
TOTAL FOR FLOOR
H
H
B
S2
Si
li
13
13
3
3
B
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ck
ok
BUILDING TOTAL
-- Sec. 504 and Table 5-B
823
516
111
111
299
229
337
132
439
2997
1303
81
1 58
158
1006
198
44")
435
3786
440
334
223
104
101
108
107
95
107
95
489
2209
6783
27000 0.03 ok
36000 0.01 ok
36000 0.0 ok
36000 0.0 ok
36000 0.01 ok
36000 0.01 ok
36000 0.01 ok
36000 0.0 ok
36000 0.01 ok
32981 0.09 ok
36000 0.04 ok
36000 0.0 ok
36000 0.0 ok
36000 0.0 ok
27000 0.04 ok
36000 0.01 ok
36000 0.01 ok
36000 0.01 ok
33071 0.11, ok
36000 0.01 ok
36000 0.01 ok
36000 0.01 ok
54000 0.0 ok
36000 0.0 or.
36000 0.0 ok
36000 0.0 ok
36000 0.0 ok
36000 0.0 ok
36000 0.0 ok
36000 0.01 ok
36574 0.06 ok
66062 0.1 ok
The maximum height of the building is 65. feet. -- Table 5-B
EXTERIOR WALL FIRE RATINGS AND OPENING PROTECTION
Table 5-A
NORTH
Fo r
Occupancy
B
A3
M
S1
S2
Bearing
Wall
1 hour
1 hour
1 hour
1 hour
1 hour
Non -Bearing
Wall
0 hour
0 hour
0 hour
0 hour
0 hour
4
Opening
Protection
None
None
None
None
None
Construction
Materal
Non -Comb
Non -Comb
Non -Comb
Non -Comb
Non -Comb
(Exterior wall rating and opening protection cont'd.)
Parapet
Requi red
No
No
No
No
No
•
•
•
EAST
For
Occupancy
B
A3
M
S1
S2
SOUTH
Fo r
Occupancy
B
A3
M
S1
S2
WEST
For
Occupancy
B
A3
M
S1
S2
Bearing
Wail
1 hour
1 hour
1 hour
1 hour
1 hour
Bearing
Wall
1 hour
1 hour
1 hour
1 hour
1 hour
Bearing
Wall
1 hour
1 hour
1 hour
1 hour
1 hour
Non -Bearing
Wall
0 hour
0 hour
0 hour
0 hour
0 hour
Non -Bearing
Wall
O hour
0 hour
O hour
0 hour
0 hour
Non -Bearing
Wall
0 hour
0 ;our
0 Hour
0 hour
O hour
Opening
Protection
None
None
None
None
None
Opening
Protection
None
None
None
None
None
Opening
Protection
None
None
None
None
None
Construction
Material
Non -Comb
Non -Comb
Non -Comb
Non -Comb
Non -Comb
Construction
Material
Non -Comb
`on -Comb
Non -Comb
Non -Comb
Non -Comb
Construction
Materia]
Non -Comb
Non -Comb
Non -Comb
Non -Comb
Non -Comb
Parapet
Required
No
No
No
No
No
Parapet
Required
No
No
No
No
No
Parapet
Required
No
No
No
No
No
Ncne -- No fire protection requirements for openings.
Non -Comb -- Non -Combustible construction
OTHER BUILDING ELEMENTS Table 6-A
ELEMENT
Interior Bearing wall
Interior nonbrg wall
Structural Frame
Exterior Struct Frame
Shaft Enclosure
Floor/Ceiling Assembly
Roof/Ceiling Assembly
Stairs
MATERIAL RATING NOTES
Noncombustible 0 hr See Footnote #2
Noncombustible 0 hr See Footnote #5
Noncombustible 0 hr See Footnote #2
Noncombustible 0 hr See footnote #1
Noncombustible 1 hr
Noncombustible 0 hr See Footnote 42
Noncombustible 0 hr See Footnote #2
Noncombustible None
NOTE: See Section 711 for shaft enclosure exceptions.
FOOTNOTES:
1) Elements in an exterior wall located where openings are not permitted
or where protection of openings is required, shall be protected
against external fire exposure as required for exterior bearing wails
or the structural frame, whichever is greater. -- Table 6-A, footnote 1
2) Sprinkler System has been used to substitute for 1 hr. ratings.
-- Sec.508. See Sec. 508 for exceptions.
4 Fire -retardant treated wood may be used within interior non-bearing
1 hr. wail assemblies. -- Table 6-A, footnote 2
5) Nonload-bearing walls within a tenant space that are not part of a
1 hr. corridor may be of:
a) Noncombustible (nonrated) materials
b) Fire retardant -treated wood
c) One-hour. construction (any material) -- Sec. 601.5.2.1
3
•
•
•
8; If the entire roof structure is 25 feet or more above any floor,
the fire rating may be allowed to be eliminated. See limitations and
requirements. -- Sec. 603.5 & 602.5
PENETRATIONS OF FIRERESISTIVE ASSEMBLIES
WALLS ASSEMBLIES -- Sec. 709.6
Through penetrations:
1) Penetrations shall be installed as tested in the rated assembly.
-- Sec. 709.6.2
2) Penetrations shall be protected by an approved penetration
firestop system and shall have an F rating of not less than the
required rating of the wall penetrated. -- Sec. 709.6.3
Exception: When penetrating items are steel, ferrous or copper
pipes or steel conduits and the wall is concrete or
masonry, the annular space shall be permitted Lo be
grout or mortar. The minimum thickness is the
thickness required to maintain the fire rating. The
maximum size of the penetrating items is equivalent
to a 6 -inch diameter and the opening is a maximum of
144 square inches. -- Sec. 709.6.1
Membrane penetrations:
The requirements are the same as for through penetrations.
-- Sec. 709.7
Exceptions:
1. Steel electrical outlet boxes that do not exceed 16 square
inches provided that the area of such openings does not exceed
100 square inches for any 100 square feet of wall area.
Boxes on opposite sides of the assembly shall be
separated by a horizontal distance of not less than 24
inches.
2. Sprinklers with metal escutcheon plates.
Noncombustible penetrating items shall not be connected to
combustible materials on both sides of the membrane unless it can
be confirmed that the fire -resistive integrity of wall is
maintained. -- Sec. 709.7
FLOOR/CEILING AND ROOF/CEILING ASSEMBLIES -- Sec. 710.2
Through penetrations:
Through penetrations of fire -resistive horizontal assemblies shall
be enclosed in fire -resistive shaft enclosures. -- Sec. 710.2.1
Exceptions:
1. When penetrating items are steel, ferrous or copper conduits,
pipes, tubes and vents through a single concrete floor, the
annular space shall be permitted to be grout or mortar.
The minimum thickness is the thickness required to maintain
the fire rating. The maximum size of the penetrating items is
equivalent to a 6 -inch diameter and the opening is a maximum
of 144 square inches.
2. Electrical outlet boxes that have been tested for use in
fire -assemblies.
The system shall have an F rating and a T rating of not less than
one hour but not less than the required rating of the floor system.
-- Sec. 710.2.3
Exception: Floor penetrations contained and located within the
cavity of a wall do not require a T rating.
4
•
•
•
Membrane penetrations:
The requirements are the same as for through penetrations.
-- Sec. 710.3
Exceptions:
When penetrating items are steel, ferrous cr copper
conduits, eiecr_ricai outiet boxes, pipes, tubes and vents
through concrete or masonry and the annular space is
protected by an approved penetration firestop assembly or
protected to prevent the free passage of flame and
products of combustion. Such penetrations shall not
exceed an aggregate area of 100 square inches in any 100
square feet of ceiling area in assemblies without
penetrations.
2. Electrical outlet boxes that have been tested for use in
fire -assemblies.
3. Sprinklers with metal escutcheon plates.
Fire -resistive roofs may have unprotected openings. -- Sec. 710.4
SMOKE and FIRE DAMPERS -- Sec. 713.10 and 713.11
Dampers shall be accessible for inspection and servicing:
1. Penetrations through occupancy separations.
2. Penetrations of the fire -resistive construction of corridors
serving as a means of egress.
Exception: Openings for steel ducts penetrating the required
fire -resistive construction of corridors are not
required to have smoke dampers when such ducts
are of not less than 0.019 -inch thickness
(26 gage) and have no openings serving the
corridor.
3. Penetrations of shaft enclosures.
Exceptions:
1. Duct penetrations by steel exhaust air subducts
extending vertically upward at least 22 inches above
the top of the opening in a vented shaft where the
airflow is upward.
2. Penetrations of a fire -resistive floor forming the
base of a shaft enclosure may be protected by fire
dampers listed for installation in the horizontal
position.
3. Smoke dampers are not required when shaft is exhaust
only, and is used for continuously operating fans.
OCCUPANCY SEPARATIONS Table 3-B
B -A3 Ohr
3-M Ohr
B -S1 Ohr
B -S2 Ohr
A3 -M Ohr
A3 -S1 Ohr
A3 -S2 Ohr
M -S1 Ohr This separation is not required. Sec. 309.2.2 exc. 3
M -S2 Ohr This separation is riot required. Sec. 309.2.2 exc. 3
S1-S2 lhr
5
•
•
•
HEATING EQUIPMENT SEPARATION:
A 1 hr. occupancy separation is required around rooms containing a
boiler or central heating unit greater than 400,000 BTU input.
-- Sec. 302.5
ADDITIONAL SEPARATIONS:
of che building as required for an H7 occupancy regardless of area. A
horizontal occupancy separation may be limited to the actual floor
area of the machinery room. Structural supporting elements shall be
protected for the type of construction only. -- Sec. 2802
A 1 hour separation is required from an B occupancy. -- Table 3-B
EXIT REQUIREMENTS:
FL NAME
NUMB MIN MIN PANIC HALLWAY/ DOOR NOTES
OCC EXITS WIDTH HDWR CORRIDOR SWING
2 Meeting Room 2 55 2 11.0 Yes Corridor Out 4 18
2 Meeting Room 1 34 1 6.8 No Hallway N/R
2 Womens HC Restroom AC2 - 0.4 No Hallway N/R
2 Mens HC Restroom AC2 1 0.4 No Hallway N/R
2 Tramway Eng. Office 3 1 0.6 No Hallway N/R 11
2 Corporate Office 2 1 0.4 No Hallway N/R 11
2 Gln. Caverns Office 3 1 0.6 No Hallway N/R 11
2 Furniture Storage 0.0 No Hallway N/R
2 Non -habitable Area 0.0 No N/A N/R
TOTAL 97 2 29.1 Yes N/A Out 12
1 Retail Sales Room 43 1 8.6 No Hallway N/R
1 Tramway Control Room 1 1 0.2 No N/A N/R
1 Mens HC Rest Room AC3 1 0.6 No Hallway N/R
1 Womens HC Rest Room AC3 1 0.6 No Hallway N/R
1 Dining Room 67 2 13.4 Yes Corridor Out 4 18
1 Snack Bar Serv. Area 13 1 2.6 No Hallway N/R
1 Kitchen 2 1 0.4 No N/A N/R
1 Non -habitable Area 0.0 No N/A N/R
TOTAL 126 2 25.2 Yes N/A Out 12
B1 Staff Lounge 29 1 5.8 No Hallway N/R
81 Caving Managers 3 1 0.6 No Hallway N/R 11
B1 Wild Tour Hq. 2 1 0.4 No Hallway N/R 11
B1 Rest. Storage Rm AC 0.0 No Hallway N/R
Bi Retail Storage AC 0.0 No Hallway N/R
B1 Mechanical Room AC 0.0 No Hallway N/R
131 Men's HC Rest Room AC2 1 0.4 No Hallway N/R
B1 Guides Men's Shower AC2 1 0.4 No Hallway N/R
B1 Womens HC Rest Room AC2 1 0.4 No Hallway N/R
B1 Guides womens ShowerAC2 1 0.4 No Hallway N/R
B1 Non -habitable Area AC 0.0 No N/A N/R
TOTAL 34 2 29.1 No N/A N/R 12
NOTE: Areas with 'AC' before the number of occupants area is an accessory
area for determining occupant loads.
Sec. 1003.2.2.2.1, Exception
Hallways shall be considered as intervening rooms for exit -access design
purposes. -- Sec. 1004.3.3.1
6
•
Walls and ceilings of hallways are not required to be fire -resistive.
- - Sec. 1004.3.3.3
There is no restriction as to the amount and type of openings unless
protection of openings is required by some other code provision.
- - Sec. 1004.3.3.4
Elevator lobbies are not required. -- Sec. 1004.3.3.5
In areas where 2 exits are required, the minimum separation is 1/2 of
the maximum diagonal of the area or floor. -- Sec. 1004.2.4
When 2 exits are required, exits must be arranged so that it is possible
to go in either direction from any point in a corridor or hallway to a
separate exit, except for dead ends not exceeding 20 feet in length.
-- Sec. 1004.2.6
Exit signs are required from all areas where 2 or exits are required.
--- Sec. 1003.2.8.2, Exception 2
No point to be more than 100 feet from an exit sign.
Main exterior exit doors which obviously and clearly are identifiable
as exits need not be signed when approved. -- Sec. 1003.2.8.2, Exception 1
Door swing is based on Sec. 1003.3.1.5 except as noted.
Occupant load factor is based on Table 10-A.
Number of exits is based on Table 10-A except as noted.
Exit width is in inches and based on Sec. 1003.2.3 and Table 10-B
Exit width is to be divided approximately equally among exits.
-- Sec. 1003.2.3.2
Width shown for all areas is based on other egress components.
Width shown for 1st floor is based on other egress components.
Width shown for other floors & basements is based on stairways.
Table 10-B
NOTE: When the occupant load on an upper floor is greater than the
floor(s) below, minimum exiting requirements are to be maintained.
-- Sec. 1003.2.3.3
For the minimum width of doors, see Sec. 1003.3.1.3
For the minimum width of hallways, see Sec. 1004.3.3.2
For the minimum width of corridors, see Sec. 1004.3.4.2
For the minimum width of stairways, see Sec. 1003.3.3.2
FOOTNOTES:
4) Panic hardware is based on Sec. 1007.2.5
See exception for main exit in A-3 occupancies and churches.
11) Corridors within an office space with an occupant load of 100 or less
are not required to be rated. -- Sec. 1004.3.4.3, Exception 5
12) Within office spaces corridors are not required to be rated if
an automatic smoke -detection system is installed within the
corridors. -- Sec. 1004.3.4.3, Exception 6
18) The requirement for this hallway/corridor to be a corridor is based
on this area requiring more than one exit. -- Sec. 1004.2.2, Exception
2
NOTE: One exit may be through an adjoining or intervening room, which
in turn provides direct access to an exit or to a corridor.
7
•
•
•
-- Sec. 1004.2.2, Exception 4.
FLUSH AND SURFACE BOLTS:
Manually operated edge- or surface -mounted flush bolts and surface
bolts or any other type of device that may be used to close or
restrain the door other than by operation of the locking device
shall not be used. When automatic flush bolts are used, the door
leaf having the automatic flush bolt shall not have a door knob or
surface -mounted hardware. The unlatching of any leaf shall not
require more than one operation. -- Sec. 1003.3.1.8
LOCKS AND LATCHES:
Regardless of the occupant load served, exit doors shall be openable
from the inside without the use of a key or any special knowledge or
effort. -- Sec. 1003.3.1.8
Key -locking hardware may be used on the main exit when the main exit
consists of a single door or pair of doors if there is a sign stating
THIS DOOR MUST REMATN UNLOCKED DURING BUSINESS HOURS. When unlocked,
doors must swing without the operation of any latching device. -- exc.
STAIR NOTES:
Public stairways:
1) The rise of steps shall not be less than 4 inches or greater than 7
inches. The minimum run is 11 inches. The maximum variation is 3/8
inch in a flight of stairs. -- Sec. 1003.3.3.3
2) The minimum width of a stairway is 36 inches, 44 inches if the
occupant load is greater than 49. -- Sec. 1003.3.3.2
Also see exit table above to see if minimum width is greater than
44 inches.
3) Provide a handrail on both sides of stairway 34 to 38 inches above the
nosing. May be on one side of stairways less than 44 inches wide.
- - Sec. 1003.3.3.6, Exception 1
4) Provide a guardrail where drop off is greater than 30 inches.
-- Sec. 509.1
5) The minimum height of a guardrail is 42 inches. Sec. 509.2
6) Open guardraiis shall have intermediate rails or ornamental pattern
configured so that a sphere 4 inches in diameter cannot pass through.
- - Sec. 509.3 The triangular opening formed at the riser, tread and
guardrail may be 6 inches. -- 509.3, Exception 2
7) The minimum headroom is 6 ft.- 8 inches. Such clearance shall be
measured vertically from a plane parallel and tangent to the stairway
tread nosing Lo the soffit above al all points. -- Sec. 1003.3.3.4
8) Enclosed usable space under the stairs is required to be protected
as required for 1 hr. fire -resistive construction. -- Sec. 1003.3.3.9
Interior stairways are required to be within exit enclosures. -- Sec.
1005.3.3.1. See Exception 1 for stairway serving only one adjacent
floor.
1) The walls of the enclosure
-- Sec. 1005.3.3.2
2) The openings into the exit
assemblies. Note: Openings
are required to be 1 -hr fire assemblies.
enclosure are required to be 1 hour
into enclosure are limited to those
necessary to egress normally occupied spaces. Doors shall be
maintained self-closing or shall be automatic closing by actuation
of a smoke detector. -- Sec. 1005.3.3.5
3) A connection to the exterior is required with the same fire
8
•
•
•
protection as the exit enclosure. -- Sec. 1005.3.3.3
4) The space under the stairs (enclosed or not) may not be used for any
purpose. -- Sec. 1005.3.3.6
RAMP REQUIREMENTS: (Interior or Ex:erior)
1) The minimum widLh is 44 inches. if a ramp serves an occupant load of
49 or less, it may be 36 inches wide. If the ramp is serving a high
occupant load, check exit table above for required width.
- - Sec. 1003.4.2
2) if the ramp is part of the accessible route, the maximum slope is
1:12. All other ramps may have a slope of 1:8 or less.
- - Sec. 1003.3.4.3
3) When the slope is greater than 1:20, landings shall be provided at
the top and bottom and for each 5 feet of rise. Top landings and
intermediate landings shall be aL least 5 feet in the direction of
travel. Landings at the bottom of ramps shall be at least 6 feet in
the direction of travel. -- Sec. 1003.3.4.4
4) Handrails shall be per stair requirements. -- Sec. 1003.3.4.5
5) The surface shall be roughened or shall be of slip -resistant
materials. -- Sec. 1003.3.4.8
LANDINGS AT DOORS:
1) A floor or landing shali be provided on each side of doors. When
access for persons with disabilities is required. the floor or landing
shall not be more than 1/2 inch lower than the threshold. When access
is not required, the maximum is 1 inch. -- Sec. 1003.3.1.6
2) Landings shall have a width not less than the width of the stairway
or width of the doorway, whichever is the greater. Where a landing
serves an occupant load of 50 or more, doors in any position shall
not reduce the landing dimension to less than one half it required
width. The minimum length in the direction of exit travel is 44 inches.
- - Sec. 1003.3.1.7
TRAVEL DISTANCE: (distance to an exit)
The maximum travel distance in this building is 2:30 feet.
-- Sec. 1004.2.5.2.3
Travel distance shall not be limited within an exit enclosure.
-- Sec. 1005.2.2
BU1LDiNG ACCESSIBI;,ITY:
1) This building including each tenant shall be provided with at least
one entrance which complies with the accessible route provisions of
CABO/ANSI A117.1. At least 50 percent of all entrances shall be
accessible. -- Sec. 1103.2.3
2) When more that one exit is required from any accessible space, each
accessible portion of the space shall be served by not less than two
accessible means of egress. -- Sec. 1104.1.1
NOTE: Exit stairways in buildings protected throughout by an approved
automatic sprinkler system arc NOT required to incorporate an area of
refuge. -- Sec. 1104.1.2, Exception 2
ROOFING REQUIREMENTS:
1) The roofing on this building is required to be Class B or better.
- - Table 15-A
2) See section 1504 and ICB0 research reports for requirements.
9
•
•
AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEMS:
:f there are 100 or more sprinklers, all valves controlling the
water supply and water -flow switches shall be electrically monitored.
Valve monitoring and water -flow alarm and trouble signals shall be
distinctly different and shall be automatically transmitted to an
approved central station, remote station or proprietary monitoring
station. -- Sec. 904.3.1. Consult with the Glenwood Springs Fire
Department for any additional requirements.
WARNING: -- If any of the above require a sprinkler system throughout
the building, then the sprinkler system cannot be used for one hour
substitution. -- Sec. 508
STANDPIPE REQUIREMENTS:
There is no requirement for a standpipe. -- Table 9-A
FOOTNOTES:
2) A standpipe is not required in the basement. -- Table 9-A, footnote 1
VENTILATION:
All areas customarily occupied by humans shall be provided with natural
ventilation by means of openable exterior openings with an area of not
less than 1/20 of the total floor area or shall be provided with a
mechanically operated ventilation system. Such system shall be capable
of supplying a minimum of lb cubic feet per minute of outside air per
occupant. -- Sec. 1202.2.1
WALL ANI) C::IL=NG FINISH:
1) Wali and ceiling finish materials are required to comply with
Sec. 804.1 and Table 8-B.
2) Carpeting on the ceiling is required to have a Class I flame
spread rating. -- Sec. 804.2
3) Textile wall coverings shall have Class 1 flame spread rating.
and shall be protected by automatic sprinklers or meet the
acceptance criteria of U.B.C. Standard No. 8-2 -- Sec. 805
4) Toilet room floors shall have a smooth, hard nonabsorbent surface
that extends upward onto the walls at least 5 inches.
-- Sec. 807.1.1
5) Walls within 2 feet of the front and sides of urinals and water
closets shall have a smooth, hard nonabsorbent surface.
-- Sec. 807.1.2
INSULATION NOTES:
1) All insulation material including facings are required to have a
flame -spread rating of 25 or less and a maximum smoke density of 450.
-- Sec. 707.3
2) Foam plastic insulation is required to be protected. -- Sec. 2602
ADDITIONAL, REQUIREMENTS:
For B occupancy
For A3 occupancy
PLATFORMS:
1) Permanent platforms shall be constructed of materials as required
for type II -1 hr construction. -- Sec. 405.2
2) I` the area under the platform is used for any purpose (including
10
•
•
•
storage) other than equipment wiring or plumbing, then the floor
construction shall be not less than 1 hour fire -resistive.
-- Sec. 405.2
Floor-ist Occupancy -Dining Room
When seats are not fixed, the capacity of this area is required to
be posted at 67 occupants in a conspicuous place on an approved
sign near the main exit. -- Sec. 1007.2.6
Floor -2nd Occupancy -Meeting Room 2
When seats are not fixed, the capacity of this area is required to
be posted at 55 occupants in a conspicuous place on an approved
sign near the main exit. -- Sec. 1007.2.6
ACCESSIBLE FACILITIES:
NOTE: Except as noted, section numbers listed below are from
CABO/ANSI A117.1 - 1992
WATER FOUNTAINS AND WATER COOLERS:
At least 50 percent of drinking fountains, but not less than one,
provided on every floor shall be accessible. -- UBC Sec. 1105.4.1
Accessible units :rust comply with the following:
1) Spout is to be within 36 inches of the floor. -- Sec. 4.15.2.1
2) Spout arranged for parallel approach shall be located 3 inches
maximum from the front edge. Spouts of cantilevered units with
knee and toe clearances shall be located 15 inches minimum from
the vertical support and 5 inches maximum from the front edge.
- - Sec. 4.15.2.2
3) Spouts shall provide a flow of water 4 inches height minimum.
- - Sec. 4.15.2.3
4) Operable parts shall be located at or near the front edge of the
unit and shall comply with 4.25 4 -- Sec. 4.15.3
5) A cantilevered unit is required to extend 17 inches minimum from
the vertical support. Clear knee space :rust provide a clear area
of 8 inches in depth at 27 inches high and 11 inches at 9 inches
minimum above the floor. -- Sec. 4.15.4.1
6) Forward approach units shall comply with 4.2. Units in alcoves
shall comply with 4.2.4.4. Units not having the necessary knee
and toe clearance or clear space under them shall comply with
4.2.4 and have a clear floor space that allows a person in a
wheelchair to make a parallel approach. -- Sec. 4.15.4.2
TOILET FACILITIES:
1) A 60 inch diameter unobstructed turning space is required in
the toilet room. -- Sec. 4.16.3, 4.2.3 & Fig. B4.2.3
2) Water closet shall be mounted adjacent to a side wall or
partition. The distance from the side wall or partition to the
centerline of the water closet shall be 18 in. Sec. 4.17.1
3) When the accessible water closet is not in a stall:
The clear floor space shall be 48 in minimum in front
of the water closet and 42 in from the center line of the
water closet on the side not adjacent to the wall.
-- Sec. 4.17.2 & Fig. B4.17.2
4) When the accessible water closet is in a stall.:
11
•
s
•
The stall shall be 60 in wide minimum and 56 in deep minimum
for wall hung water closets and 59 in deep minimum for floor
mounted water closets. -- Sec. 4.18.3.1
If the door swings into the stall, the required depth shall
be increased by 36 inches minimum. -- Sec. 4.18.3.2 &
Fig. 34.18.3.1
5) The bars are to be 33 to 36 inches above the floor and shall
be provided on the rear wall and on the side wall closest to
the water closet. -- Sec. 4.24.2.2 & Figs. B4.17.3, 34.17.4
and 34.18.3.1
a) Side grab bar is required to start within 12 inches of the
back wall and extend to 54 inches from the back wall. (The
minimum length of the bar is 42 in) -- Sec. 4.17.4.1 &
Figs. B4.17.3 and B4.18.3.1
b) The rear bar shall be 24 in long minimum, centered on the
water closet. Where space permits, the bar shall be 36 in
long minimum, with the additional length provided on the
transfer side. -- Sec. 4.17.4.2 & Figs. B4.17.3, B4.17.4
and 134.18.3.1
6) The top of the seat on the water closet is required to be 11
o 19 inches above the floor. -- Sec. 4.17.3 & Fig. B4.17.3
1) Accessible urinals shall he of the stall type or wall hung with
the rim at 17 inches maximum above the floor. -- Sec. 4.19.2
8) A clear area of 30 X 48 inches minimum is required in front
of :he urinal. Privacy shields shall not extend beyond the
front edge of the urinal rim, unless they are 30 inches apart
minimum. -- Sec. 4.19.3
9) Accessible lavatories shall be mounted with the rim 34 inches
maximum above the floor and a clearance of 29 inches minimum
from the floor to the bottom of the front edge of the apron.
-- Sec. 4.20.2.1 & Fig. 34.20.3.1
10) It shall extend 17 inches minimum from the wall. The clear knee
space shall be 8 inches in depth minimum at 27 inches minimum
above the floor and 11 inches in depth minimum at 9 in minimum
above the floor. The dip of the overflow shall be ignored when
checking the clearances. -- Sec. 4.20.3.1 & Fig. 34.20.3.1
11) A clear floor space of. 30 X 48 inches minimum shall be provided
in front of the lavatory and shall extend 19 inches maximum
under the lavatory. -- Sec. 4.20.3.2 & Fig. 34.20.3.2
121 Water supply and drain pipes under lavatories shall be
insulated or otherwise treated to protect against contact.
-- Sec. 4.20.4
13) The bottom of mirror is required to be within 38 inches of
the floor. -- Sec. 4.16 6 & Fig. 34.20.3.1
GLAZINC REQU1RrMENTS
All glazing in hazardous locations is required to be of safety
glazing material. -- Sec. 2406.3 & 2406.4
Locations:
1) Glazing in ingress and egress doors except jalousies.
2) Glazing in fixed and sliding panels of sliding door assemblies
and panels in swinging doors other than wardrobe doors.
3) Glazing in storm doors.
4) Glazing in all unframed swinging doors.
5) Glazing in doors and enclosures for hot tubs, whirlpools, saunas,
12
•
•
•
steam rooms, bathtubs and showers. Glazing in any portion of a
building wall enclosing these compartments where the bottom exposed
edge of the glazing is less than 60 inches above a standing surface
and drain inlet.
6) Glazing in fixed or operable panels adjacent to a door where the
nearest exposed edge of the glazing is within a 24 -inch arc of
either vertical edge of the door in a closed position and where the
bottom exposed edge of the glazing is less than 60 inches above the
walking surface.
7) Glazing in an individual fixed or operable panel, other than those
locations described in items 5 and 6 above, than meets al] of the
following conditions:
A. Exposed area of an individual pane greater than 9 square feet.
B. Exposed bottom edge less than 18 inches above the floor.
C. Exposed top edge greater than 36 inches above the floor.
D. One or more walking surfaces within 36 inches horizontally of
the plane of the glazing.
8) Glazing in railings regardless of height above a walking surface.
Included are structural baluster panels and nonstructural in -fill
panels.
9) Glazing in walls and fences used as the barrier for indoor and
outdoor swimming pools and spas when the bottom edges is less than
60 inches above the pool side and the glazing is within 5 feet
of the pool or spa water's edge.
.0) Glazing in walls enclosing stairway landings or within 5 feet of
thea bottom and top of stairways where the bottom edge is less
than 60 inches above the walking surface.
CRAWLSPACE REQUIREMENTS:
1) Provide ventilation either by mechanical means or by openings in
exterior walls. Opening shall provide a net area of not less than
1 square foot for each 150 square feet of area in crawl space.
Openings shall be distributed on two opposite sides and be located
as close to corners as practical. -- Sec. 2306.7
Note: Vent openings may be reduced to 10% of the above if ground
surface area is covered with an approved vapor barrier and the
building official approves.
2) Provide 18 -inch by 24 -inch access opening to the crawl space area.
Note: Opening may be required to be larger if mechanical equipment
is located in the crawl space. -- Sec. 2306.3
3) Unless the wood is listed as an approved wood of natural_ resistance
to decay or treated wood, the minimum clearance between exposed earth
and floor joist is 18 inches. The minimum clearance to beams and
girders is 12 inches. -- Sec. 2306.3
13
•
•
Hougland & Associates
5616 County Road 100
Carbondale, CO 81623
Ph/Fax (970) 963-2312 -- E-mail = `iresafe@roe .r:et
Plan analysis based on
the 1997 Edition of the Uniform Building Code
Project Number: GarCJC6.02
Pro`ect Nage: Glenwood Tramway Company
Address: Tramway Upper Terminal
Contractor: STP Enterprise
Designer: Tramway Engineering, LTD
Engineer: Charles Roger Peterson 17809
Occupancy: A3, B, M, SI & S2
Construction: V-lhr.
Report 13y: Arc 1?ougland
Date: June 26, 2002
NOTE: The code items listed in this report are not intended to be a
complete listing of all possible code requirements in the 1997 UBC.
It is a guide to selected sections of the code.
Portions of the material contained in this program are reproduced
from the Uniform Building Code published by the International Conference
of Building Officials.
Notice:
The review of plans and specifications does not constitute an accepcance
of any responsibility by Hougland & Associates for errors, omissions or
discrepancies. The responsibility for these items and implementation
dur'r:q construction rests specifically with the architect, engineers,
designers, builders and owner. Comments and notations are intended to be
constructive and in support of the owners interest.
NVPA 13 sprinkler system throughout the building
Sprinkler system used for 1 hr. substitution -- Sec. 508
SEPARATION
DIRECTION BOUNDARY AREA INC.RF;ASE FIRE PROTECTION
NORTH Property line 500.0 Feet 500.0 Feet
BAST Property line 500.0 Feet 500.0 Feet
SOUTH Property line 500.0 Feet 500.0 Feet
WEST Property line 500.0 Feet 500.0 "Feet
Allowable area increased 100.'s for open area on 4 sides.
-- Sec. 505.1
•
•
•
FL NAME OCC MAX E'LR AREA ALLOWED RATIO STATUS
2 Meeting Room 2 A3 ok 823 21000 0.04 ok
2 Meeting Room 1 H ok 516 28000 0.02 ok
2 Womer.s HC Restroo:r, 13 ok 111 28000 0.0 ok
2 Mens HC Restroom 3 ok 21: 28000 0.0 ok
2 Tramway Eng. Office B ok 299 28000 0.01 ok
2 Corporate Office B ok 229 28000 0.01 ok
2 Gln. Caverns Office B 0< 337 28000 0.01 ok
2 Furniture Storage S1 ok :32 28000 0.0 ok
2 Non -habitable Area B ok 439 28000 0.02 ok
TOTAL FOR FLOOR 2997 25652 0.12 ok
Rea_1 Sales Room M ok 1303 28000 0.05 ok
Tramway Control Room 13 ok 81 28000 0.0 ok
1 Mens HC Rest Room B ok 158 28000 0.01 ok
1 Womens HC Rest Room B ok 158 28000 0.01 ok
1 Dining Room A3 ok 1006 21000 0.05 ok
1 Snack Bar Serv. Area R ok 198 28000 C.01 ok
1 Kitchen 13 ok 447 2.8000 0.02 ok
1 Non-habitableArea R ok 435 28000 0.02 ok
TOTAL FOR FLOOR 3786 25722 0.15 ok
B1 Staff Lounge B ok 440 28000 C.02 ok
Bi Caving Managers i3 ok 334 20000 0.01 ok
B1 Wild Tour Hq. B ok 223 28000 0.01 ok
81 Rest. Storage Rm 52 ok 104 42000 0.0 ok
B1 Retail Storage S1 ok 1C7 2.8000 0.0 ok
Bi Mechanical Room R ok 108 28000 0.0 ok
B1 Men's HC Rest Room B ok 107 28000 0.0 ok
B1 Guides Men's Shower B ok 95 28000 0.0 ok
B1 Wo:rens HC Rest Room 13 ok 107 28000 0.0 ok
131 Guides womens Shower R ok 95 20000 0.0 ok
B1 Non -habitable Area B ok 489 28000 0.02 ok
TOTAL FOR FLOOR 2209 28446 0.08 ok
BUILDING TOTAL
-- Sec. 504 and Table 5-'3
6783 51382 0.13 ok
An A-3 occupancy in a basement or above the first floor is required
to he of. 1 hour construction. -- Sec. :303.2.2.2.
The actual neigh': of this ba_ldinq is 36. feet.
The maximum height of the :building is 50. feet. -- Table 5-B
EXTERIOR WALL FIRE RATINGS AND OPENING PROTECTION
Table 5-A
NORTH
For Bearing Nor. -Bearing Coer.ing Construction Parapet
Occupancy Wall Wall Protection Material Required
L3 1 hour 1 hour None Any No
A3 1 hour 1 hour None Any No
M 1 hour 1 hour None Any No
SI 1 hour 1 hour None Any No
52 1 hour 1 hour None Any No
S1_ r.s.f - -1g- s?417
2
•
•
EAST
For
////
/cupancy
A3
M
S1
S2
SOUTH
For
Occupancy
B
A3
M
S1
S2
\ WEST
For
Occupancy
\B
A3
M
S 1\
S2 \
None
Bearing
Wall
1 hour
1 ::our
1 ".our
1 hour
1 hour
Bearing
Wall
1 hour
1 Hour
1 :your
1 hour
1 hour
Bearing
Wall
1 hour
hour
1 hour
1 hour
1 hour
Non -Bear
Wall
1 hour
1 'your
1 hour
1 hour
1 hour.
Non -Bearing
Wall
1
1
hour
hour
.your
hour
I hour
cff,isooitAt c"6-2 X110,54
Opening
Protection
None
None
Nene
None
None
1 Opening
Protection
None
None
None
None
None
Non -Bearing 1 Opening
Wall Protection
1 hour I None
1 hour None
hour Nene
1 hour 1 None
1 hour None
Construction
Material
Any
Any
Any
Any
Any
Construction
Material
Any
Any
Any
Any
Any
Construction
Material
Any
Any
Any
Any
Any
Parapet
Required
No
No
No
No
No
Parapet
Required
No
No
No
No
No
Parapet.
Required
No
No
No
No
No
-=_No__fi-re protection. requirements for openings.
OTHER BUILDING ELEMENTS
MATERIAL
Any
Any
Any
Any
Any
Any
Any
Ariy
ELEMENT
Interior Bearing wail
interior non-brg wall
Structural Frame
Exterior Struct Frame
Shaft Enclosure
Floor/Ceiling Assembly
Roof/Ceiling Assembly
Stairs
Table 6-A
RATING NOTES
0 hr See Footnote #2
0
0
0
1
0
0
None
hr
hr
hr
hr
hr See Feotnate 02
hr See Footnote #2
See Footnote #5
See Footnote 42
See footnote #1
NOTE: See Section 711 for scaft enclosure exceptions.
FOOTNOTES:
1) Elements in an exterior wall located where openings are not permitted
or where protection of openings is required, shall be protected
against external fire exposure as required for exterior bearing walls
Cr the structural frame, whichever is greater. -- Table 6-A, footnote 1
2) Sprinkler System has been used to substitute for 1 hr. ratings.
Sec.508. See Sec. 508 for exceptions.
Non -load-bearing walls within a tenant space that are not part of a
1 hr. corridor may be of:
a) Noncombustible (non -rated) materials
b) Fire retardant -treated wood
c) Cne-hour construction (any material) -- Sec. 601.5.2.1
3
•
Penetrations of shaft enclosures.
Exceptions:
1. Duct penetrations by steel exhaust air subducts
extending vertically upward at least 22 inches above
the top of the opening in a ven'ed shaft where the
airflow is ::pward.
2. Penetrations of a fire -resistive floor forming the
base of a shaft enclosure may be protected by fire
dampers listed for .installation its the horizontal
position.
3. Smoke dampers are not required when shaft is exhaust
only, and is used for continuously operating fans.
OCCUPANCY SEPARATIONS Table 3-B
B -A3 Ohr
B -M Ohr
B -S1 Otir
B-52 Chr
A3 -M Ohr
A3 -S: Ohr
A3 -S2 Chr
M -S1 Ohr This separation is not required. Sec. 309.2.2 exc. 3
M -S2 Ohr This separation is not required. Sec. 309.2.2 exc. 3
S1-S2 ihr
HEATING EQUIPMENT SEPARATION:
A 1 hr. occupancy separation is required around Mechanical Room if it
contains a boiler or central heating unit greater t`:an 400,000 BTU input.
-- Sec. 302.5
EXIT REQUIREMENTS:
FL NAME NUMB MIN MIN PANIC HALLWAY/ DOOR NOTES
OCC EXITS WIDTH HDWR CORRIDOR SWING
2 Meeting Room 2 55 "e 2 11.0 Yes Corridor Out 4 18
2 Meeting Room 1 34 1 6.8 No Hallway N/R
2 Womens HC Restr.00w. AC2 1 0.4 Nc Hallway N/R
2 Mens ::C Restroom AC2 1 0.4 No Hallway N/R
2 Tramway Eng. Office 3 1 0.6 No Hallway N/R 11
2 Corporate Office 2 1 0.4 No hallway N/R 11
2 Gln. Caverns Office 3 1 0.6 No Hallway N/R 11
2 E'urniture Storage 0.0 No Hallway N/R
2 Non -habitable Area 0.0 No N/A N/R
TOTAL 97 2 29.: Yes N/A Out
1 Retail Sales Room 43 1 8.6 No Hallway N/R
1 Tramway Control Room 1 1 0.2 No N/A N/R
1 Mens HC Rest Room AC3 1 0.6 No Hallway N/R
_ Womens HC Rest Room AC3 _ 0.6 No Hallway N/R
1 Dining Room 67 2 13.4 Yes Corridor Out 4 18
1 Snack Bar Serv. Area 13 1 2.6 No Hallway N/R
1 Kitchen 2 0.4 No N/A N/R
1 Non -habitable Area 0.0 No N/A N/R
TOTAL 126 2 25.2 Yes N/A Out
p
i fa Cl is —
ci ' irr 5' i1"r „w 'Rot 2.
4
41iTl 6,01 '0040.0.,14.07
•
•
B1 Staff Lounge 29 1 5.8 No Hallway N/R
131 Caving Managers 3 0.6 No Ha: Tway N/R 11
B1 Wild Tour Hq. 2 1 0.4 No Hallway N/R 11
131 Rest. Storage Rm AC 0.0 No Hallway N/R
B1 Retail Storage AC 0.0 No Hallway N/1
131 Mechanical Room AC 0.0 No Hallway N/R
81 Men's HC Rest. Room AC2 1 0.4 No Hallway N/R
B1 Guides yen's Shower AC2 1 0.4 No Hallway N/R
B1 Womens HC Rest Room AC2 1 0.4 No Hallway N/R
131 Guides womens ShowerAC2 1 0.4 No Hallway N/R
B1 Non -habitable Area AC C.0 No N/A N/R
TOTAL 34 2 29.1 No N/A N/R
NOTE: Areas with 'AC' before the number of occupants area is being
treated as an accessory for occupant loads.
-- Sec. 1003.2.2.2.1, Exception
Hallways shall be considered as intervening rooms for exit -access design
purposes. -- Sec. 1004.3.3.1
Walls and ceilings of hallways are not required to be fire -resistive
unless they are required to be fire -resistive based construction type.
- - Sec. :004.3.3.3
There is no restriction as to the amount and type of openings unless
protection of openings is required by some other code provision.
-- Sec. 1004.3.3.4
Elevator lobbies arc not required. -- Sec. 1004.3.3.E
In areas where 2 exits are required, the minimum separation is 1/2 of
the maximum diagonal of the area or floor. -- Sec. 1004.2.4
Wher. 2 exits are required, exits must be arranged so that it is possible
to go in either direct.icn frcm any point in a corridor cr hallway to a
separate exit, except for dead ends not exceeding 20 feet in length.
- - Sec. 1004.2.6
Exit signs are required from all areas where 2 or exits are required.
- - Sec. 1003.2.8.2, Exception 2
No point to be more than 100 feet from an exit sign.
Main exterior exit doors which obviously and clearly are identifiable
as exits need not be signed when approved. -- Sec. 1003.2.8.2, Exception 1
Door swing is based on Sec. 1003.3.:.5 except as noted.
Occupant load factor is based on Table 10-A.
Number of exits is based on Table 10-A except as noted.
Exit width is in inches and based on Sec. 1003.2.3 and Table 10-B
Exit width is to be divided approximately equally among exits.
- - Sec. 1003.2.3.2
Width shown for all areas is based on other egress components.
Width shown for 1st floor is based on cther egress components. —
Width shown for other floors & basements is based on stairways.
- - Table 10-B
NOTE: When the occupant load on an upper floor is greater than the
floor(s) below, minimum exiting requirements are maintained.
Sec. 1003.2.3.3 -,' (` e
For the minimum width of doors, see Sec. 1003.3.1.3 . tf
For the minimum width of hallways, see Sec. 1004.3.3.2 `14
For the minimum width of corridors, see Sec. 1004.3.4.2
Fcr the minimum width of stairways, see Sec. 1003.3.3.2 4,t
5
7
0.1‘t O —se&Ki "Vi-:4 3uleer
•
•
•
FOOTNOTES:
Pani;: hardware is based on Sec. 1007.2.5
See exception for main exit in A-3 occupancies and churches.
Corridors within an office space with an occupant load of 100 or less
are net required tc: be rated. -- Sec. 1004.3.4.3, FxcepL-en 5
The requirement for this hallway/corridor to be a corridor is based
on this area requiring more than one exit. -- Sec. 1004.2.2,Exception 2
NOTE: One exit may be through an adjoining or intervening room., which
n =.err: provides direct access to a:: exi_ or ::o a corridor.
-- Sec. 1004.2.2, Exception 4.
FLUSH AND SURFACE BOLTS:
Manually operated edge- or s.irface-mounted flush bolts and surface
bolts or any other type of device that may be used to close or
restrain the door other than by operation of the locking device
shall net be used. When automatic flush bolts are used, Lhe door
leaf having the automatic flush bolt shall not have a door knob or
surface -mounted hardware. The unlatching of any leaf shall not
require more t:hari one operation. -- Sec. 1003.3.1.8
LOCKS AND LATCHES:
Regardless of the occupant lead served, exit: doors shalt be cpenable
from the inside without the use of a key or any special knowledge or
effort. -- Sec. 1003.3.1.8
Key -locking hardware may be used or. the :Hain exit when the main exit
consists of a single door or pair of doors if there is a sign stating
THIS DOOR MUST REMAIN UNLOCKED DURING BUSINESS HOURS. When unlocked,
door(s) must swing without operation of any latching device. -- exc.
STAIR NOTES:
Public stairways:
1) The rise of steps shall not be less than 4 inches or greater than 7
inches. The minimum run is 11 inches. The maximum variation is 3/6
inch in a flight of stairs. -- Sec. 1003.3.3.3
2) The minimum width of a stairway :s 36 .inches, 44 inches if the
occupant load is greater than 49. -- Sec. 1003.3.3.2.
Also see exit table above to see if minimum width is greater than
44 inches.
3) Provide a handrail o:: bot): sides of stairway 34 to 38 inches above the
nosing. May be on one side of stairways less than 44 inches wide.
- - Sec. 1003.3.3.6, Exception 1
4) Provide a guard rail where drop off is greater than 30 inches.
-- Sec. 509.1
5) The minimum height is 42 inches. -- Sec. 509.2
6) Open guardrails shall have intermediate rails or ornamental pattern
such that a sphere 4 inches in diameter cannot pass through.
- - Sec. 509.3 The triangular opening formed at the riser, -read and
guardrail may be 6 inches. -- 509.3, Exception 2
7) The minimum headroom is 6 ft.- 8 inches. Such clearance shall be
measured verticaily from a plane parallel and tangent to the stairway
tread nosing to the soffit above at all points. -- Sec. 1003.3.3.4
6
•
1
•
8) Enclosed usable space under the stairs is required to be protected
as required for 1 hr. fire -resistive construction. -- Sec. 1003.3.3.9
Stairways are required to be in exit enclosures. -- Sec. 1005.3.3.1
Exception 1
1) The walls of the enclosure are required to be 1 hr fire assemblies.
-- Sec. 1C05.3.3.2
2) The openings into the exit enclosure are required to be 1 hour
assemblies. Note: Openings into enclosure are limited to those
necessary for egress normally occupied spaces. Doors shall be
maintained self-closing cr shall be automatic closing by actuation
of a smoke detector. -- Sec. 1005.3.3.5
3) A connection to the exterior is required with the same fire
protection as the exit enclosure. -- Sec. 1005.3.3.3
In Office buildings, 50 percent of the exits may discharge through a
street -floor lobby when an automatic sprinkler system is provided on
the entire street level floor. -- Sec. 1005.3.3.3, Exception 2
4) The space under the stairs ,enclosed or not) may not be used for any
purpose. -- Sec. 1005.3.3.6
5) A barrier is required at grade level. -- Sec. 1005.3.3.4
RAMP REQUIREMENTS:
_) The minimum width is 44 inches. If a ramp serves an occupant load of
49 or less, it may be 36 inches wide. If the ramp is serving a high
occupant load, check exit table above for required width.
- - Sec. 1003.4.2
2) If the ramp is part of the accessible route, the maximum slope is
1:12. All other ramps may have a slope of 1:8 or less.
- - Sec. 1003.3.4.3
3) hien the slope is greater than 1:20, landings shall be provided at
the top, bottom and for each 5 feet of rise. Top Landings and
intermediate landings shall be at least 5 feet in the direction of
travel. Landings at the bottom of ramps shall be at least 6 feet in
the direction of travel. -- Sec. 1003.3.4.4
4) Handrails sha'.1 be per star requirements. -- Sec. 1003.3.4.:1
5) The surface shall be roughened or shall be of slip -resistant
materials. -- Sec. 1003.3.4.8
LANDIivGS AT DOORS:
1) A f'.oar or landing shall be provided on each side of doors. When
access for persons with disabilities is required. the floor or landing
shall not be more than 1/2 inch lower than the threshold. When access
is not required, the maximum is 1 i..ch. -- Sec. 1003.3.1.6
2) Landings steal 1 have a width not less than the width of the stairway
or width of the doorway, whichever is the greater. Where a landing
serves an occupant load of 50 or more, doors in any position shall
not reduce the landing dimension to less than one half it required
width. The minimum length in the direction of exit travel is 44 inches.
-- Sec. 1003.3.1.7
TRAVEL DISTANCE: ,distance to an exit)
The maximum travel distance i:: this building is 250 fee:. -- Sec.
1004.2.5.2.3
Travel distance shall not be limited within an exit enclosure or exit
passageway. -- Sec. 1005.2.2
7
•
•
•
BUILDING ACCESS=3ILITY:
11 This building .nclwdirig each tenant sha:1 be provided with at least
one entrance which complies with the accessible route provisions of
CABO/ANSI A117.1. At least 50 percent of all entrances shall be
accessible. -- Sec. 1103.2.3
2) When more that one exit is required from any accessible space, eacn
accessible portion of the space shall be served by not less than two
accessible means of egress. -- Sec. 1104.1.1
3) when an exit stairway is part of an accessible means of egress, the
stairway shall have a clear width of not less than 46 inches between
the handrails. The stairway shall either incorporate an area of refuge
within an enlarged story -level landing or shall be accessed from
an area of refuge. -- Sec. 1104.1.2
The area of refuge shall '-.ave direct access to the stairway that serves
it. -- Sec. 1104.2.1
4) Each area of refuge shall be sized to accommodate one wheelchair space
not less thar. 30 incises by 48 inches for each 200 occupants, or
portio:: thereof. -- Sec. :1C4.2..3
5) If the area of refuge is not within the stairway, it shall be separated
from the rest of the story by a smoke barrier having at least a one-
hour fire -resistance rating. Smoke barriers shall extend to the roof or
fioor deck above. Doors shall be smoke and draft control assembi.ies
with a rating not less than 20 minutes. -- Sec. 1104.2.4
6) Two-way communications are required. -- Sec. 1104.2.5
7) Each area must be identified by a sign stating AREA OF REFUGE and the
in'_ernatior.al symbol of accessibility. -- Sec. 1104.2.7
8) NOTE: Exit stairways in buildings protected throughout by an approved
automatic sprinkler system are NOT required to incorporate an area of
refuge. -- Sec. 1104.1.2, Exception 2
ROOFING REQUIREMENTS:
1) The roofing on this building is required to be Class C. -- Table 15-A
Exception 1
2) See section i504 and ICBO research reports for requirements.
3) Check with the Glenwood Springs Fire Department for any additional
requirements related to fire safety.
AUTCMATTC SPRINKLER SYSTEMS:
If there are 100 or more sprinklers, all valves controlling the
water supply and water -flow switches shall be electrically monitored.
Valve monitoring and water -flow alarm and trouble signals shall be
distinctly different and shall be automatically transmitted to ar:
approved central statin, remote station or proprietary noni',oring
station. -- Sec. 904.3.1
STANDPIPE REQUIREMENTS:
There is no requirement for a standpipe. -- Table 9-A
FOOTNOTES:
2) A standpipe is not required in the basement. -- Table 9-A, footnote 1
VENTILATION:
Ail areas customarily occupied by hi:mans shall be provided with Natural
ventilation by means of openable exterior openings with an area of not
less than 1/20 of the total floor area or shall be provided with a
mechanically operated ventilation system. Such system shall be capable
of supplying a minimum. of 15 cubic _eet per minute of outside air per
occupant. -- Sec. 1202.2.1
8
•
•
•
WALL AND CEILING FINISH:
1) mall and ceiling Cir.:.sh materials are required to comply with
Sec. 804.1 and Table 8-B.
2) Carpeting on the ceiling is required to have a Class 1 flame
spread ran._ [:g. -- Sec. 804.2
3) Textile wall coverings shal: have Class T flame spread rating.
and shall be protected by automatic sprinklers or meet the
acceptance criteria of U.B.C. Standard No. 8-2 -- Sec. 805
4) Toilet room floors shall have a smooth, hard nonabsorbent surface
that extends upward onto the Na'.is at least 5 inches.
-- Sec. 807.1.1
5) Walls within 2 feet of the front and sides of urinals and water
closets shall have a smooth, hard nonabsorbent surface.
-- Sec. 807. 1.2
INSULATION NOTES:
1) All insulation material including facings are required to have a
flame -spread rating of 25 or :ess and a maximum smoke density of 450
unless it :s a concealed space and the facing is i:: contact with
a wall or ceiling. -- Sec. 707.3 exc.2
2) Foam plastic insulations are required to be protected. --- Sec. 2602
ADDITIONAI., REQUIREMENTS:
For 3 occupancy
For A3 occupancy
Fioor-lst Occupancy -Dining Room
When seats are not fixed, the capacity of this area is required to
be posted at 67 occupants in a conspicuous place on an approved
sign near the main exit. -- Sec. 1007.2.6
Floor -2nd Occ.:pancy-Meeting Room 2
When seats are not fixed, the capacity of this area is required to
be posted at 55 occupants in a conspicuous place on an approved
sign near the main exit. -- Sec. 1007.2.6
ACCESSIBLE FACILITIES:
NOTE: Except as noted, section numbers listed 'below are from
CABO/ANST A117.1 - 1992 and the companion Correction Report
references the 1998 edition of the A117.1 standard. Ttie
requirements in both of these editions are the same however, the
:998 provides for clarification.
WATER FOUNTAINS AND WATER COOLERS:
At least 50 percent of drinking fountains, but not less than one,
provided on every floor shall be accessible. -- J13C Sec. 1105.4.:
Accessible units must comply with the following:
1) Spout is to be within 36 inches of the floor. -- Sec. 4.15.2.1
2) Spout arranged for parallel approach shalt be located 3 inches
maximum from the front edge. Spouts of cantilevered units with
knee and toe clearances snail be located 15 inches minimum from
the vertical support and 5 inches maximum from the front edge.
-- Sec. 4.15.2.2
3) Spouts shall provide a fiow of water 4 inches height minimum.
-- Sec. 4.15.2.3
9
•
•
•
4) Operable parts shat, be located at or near the front edge of the
unit and sha:1 comply with 4.25.4 -- Sec. 4.15.3
5) A cantilevered unit is required to extend 17 inches minimum from
the vertical support. Clear knee space must provide a clear area
of 8 inches in depth at 27 inches high and 11 inches at 9 inches
minimum above the floor. -- Sec. 4.15.4.1
6) Forward approach units shall comply with 4.2. Units in alcoves
shall comply with 4.2.4.4. Units not having the necessary knee
and toe clearance or clear space under them shall comply with
4.2.4 and have a clear `icor space that a'l'lows a person in a
wheelchair to make a parallel approach. -- Sec. 4.15.4.2
TOILET FACILITIES: (Refer to Correction Report for required correct` -ons
fcr toilet and bathing facilities)
1) A 60 inch diameter unobstructed turning space is required in
the toilet room. -- Sec. 4.16.3, 4.2.3 & Fig. I4.2.3
2) Water closet shall be mounted adjacent to a side wail or
partition. The distance from the side wail or partition to the
centerline of the water closet shall be 18 in. Sec. 4.17.1
3) When the accessible water closet is not in a stall:
The clear floor space shall be 48 in minimum in front
of the water close_ and 42 in from the center line of the
water closet on the side not adjacent to the wall.
-- Sec. 4.17.2 & Fig. 84.17.2
4) When the accessible water closet is in a stall:
The s`a1 shall be 60 in wide minimum and 56 in deep minimum
for wall hung water closets and 59 in deep minimum for floor
mounted water closets. -- Sec. 4.18.3.1
IC the door swings into the stall, the required depth shall
be increased by 36 inches minimum. -- Sec. 4.18.3.2 &
Fig. B4.18.3.1
5) The bars are to be 33 to 36 inches above the floor and shall
be provided on the rear wall and or, the side wall closest to
the water closet. -- Sec. 4.24.2.2 & Figs. B4.17.3, 84.;7.4
and B4.18.3.1
a) Side grab bar is required to start within 12 inches of the
back wall and extend to 54 inches from the back wall. ;The
minimum length of the bar is 42 in) -- Sec. 4.17.4.1 &
Figs. B4.17.3 and B4.18.3.1
b) The rear bar shall be 24 in long minimum, centered on the
water closet. Where space permits, the bar shall be 36 in
long minimum, with the additional length provided on the
transfer side. -- Sec. 4.17.4.2 & Figs. B4.17.3, B4.17.4
and 84.18.3.1
6) The top of the seat on the water closet is required to be 17
to 19 inches above the floor. -- Sec. 4.17.3 & Fig. 84.17.3
7) Accessible urinals shall be of the stall type or wall hung with
the rim at 17 inches maximum above the floor. -- Sec. 4.19.2
8) A clear area of 30 X 48 inches minimum•, is required in front
of the urinal. Privacy shields shall not extend beyond the
front edge of the urinal rim, unless they are 30 inches apart
minimum. -- Sec. 4.19.3
9) Accessible lavatories shall he mounted with the rim 34 inches
maximum above the floor and a clearance of 29 inches minimum
from the floor to the bottom of the front edge of the apron.
-- Sec. 4.20.2.1 & Fig. 84.20.3.1
10
w
1
10) It shall extend 17 inches minimum from the wall. The clear knee
space shali be 8 inches in depth m_nim.:m at 27 inches minimum
above the floor and 11 inches in depth minimum at 9 in minimum
above the floor. The dip of Lhe overflow shall be ignored when
checking the clearances. -- Sec. 4.20.3.1 & Fig. 34.20.3.1
11) A clear floor space of 30 X 48 inches minimum shall be provided
in front of the lavatory and shall extend 19 inches maximum
under the lavatory. -- Sec. 4.20.3.2 & Fig. 84.20.3.2
12) Water supply and drain pipes under iavatories shall be
insulated or otherwise '.:reated to protect against contact.
-- Sec. 4.20.4
13) The bottom of mirror is required to be within 38 inches of
the floor. -- Sec. 4.16.6 & Fig. B4.20.3.1
GLAZING REQUIREMENTS
All glazing in hazardous locations is required to be of safety
glazing material. -- Sec. 2406.3 & 2406.4
Locations:
• Glazing in ingress and egress doors except jalousies.
• Glazing in fixed and sliding panels of sliding door assemblies
and panels :.r. swinging doors other than wardrobe doors.
• Glazing in storm doors.
• Glazing in all unframed swinging doors.
• Glazing in doors and enclosures for hot tubs, whirlpools, saunas,
steam rooms, bathtubs and showers. Glazing in any portion of a
buiidir,g wales enclosing these compartments where the bottom exposed
edge of the glazing is less than 60 inches above a standing surface
and drain inlet.
• Glazing in fixed or operable panels ad:agent to a door where the
nearest exposed edge of the glazing is within. a 24 -inch arc of
either vertical edge of the door in a closed position and where the
bottom exposed edge of the glazing is less than 60 inches above the
walking surface.
• Glazing in an individual fixed or operable panel, other than those
locations described in items b and 6 above, than meets all of the
following conditions:
A. Exposed area of an individual pane greater than 9 square feet.
B. Exposed bottom edge less than 18 inches above the floor..
C. Exposed top edge greater than 36 inches above the floor.
D. One or more walking surfaces within 36 inches horizontally of
the plane of the glazing.
• Glazing in walls enclosing stairway landings or within feet of
then bottom and top of stairways where Lhe bottom edge is less
than 60 inches above the walking surface.
11
41.05 4A-Cti
4 r
—3= -1 -*4A.. -_ j— Ste. _- -+ aa+_ - rirc.. K—
`� - S - - -- --- —
.-rvirrt-1 Q� _awki,o _-1,101•614L oK 1 frowym+kijitps►1---
6. re.77c_ IT4st _y,1.'LSaFa_ rvot_t4c.— -
Aporn
-1110 -- a�- !t SSG—�r+a.��
2 -ELSP �►r_c-Q.—��r.{)r. 1
•
Craix.cle
61...ibler ?Leath
and Fr•vecrwet
LLSMENT
I OWNERS NAME
COLORAL .EPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH ANL VIRONNIENT
4300 CHERRY CREEK DRIVE SOUTH
DENVER, CO S0246 -I530
PHONE (303) 692-3620 FAX (303) 753-6809
Pa,r2e one
ense
Ct
I -
ADDRESS _ (i5
<:11C;
DATF \... I 7.iPCODI:
_ _.
(.0t2s.TY I FIRM ID INSPECTOR IT) I—yR.—
I -- 1 w,7 7.)., —1 TioviA.TJNIF. I INSPECT.' IMF , • 1
—F. — _._.. •--- — ..___T__ ._;.._. i _l_ _,__r_.
C-14 IL 1-2— I 01-071-1 1 5 I 1 Z -ii 0 I '-- I n11 q I 1 I ,_LOI C..)1 ICI) lek IC) IN Ancoan,.cd
RETMIL FOOD ESTABLISHMENT INSPECTION REPORT
1 rii ori:ed tic:ex idenlIfy viol;iliom; to be con ted as indicated by the regulatory authority Failure to comply may result in further 41,:1:on byLiI
c !-cei:i.lioi y :iii;:•iii,i.
Ruid - CrillCal items: •Uhrse Reins are related dir mils to fmllionte ilines.s.
I . - Blue - Other Items: 1_ neorrected these can become scrious items.
f i r' ., • i - ;,
:. • :
Artrpros est Sour;:e
h V. K.)!eiome. r: er of Np•iv,lagr
c
d. HACCP plan
✓ Cur:sumer advisory
. •
Employee I lealth
J car:d ur feilriu,...d
1 Wourii& properly overed
• I-Leds ur-a•hed needed
•
t.
Hygienic Practices
d Hype:ix practr:es
e Smoking.eahng, drinking
Demonstration of Knowledge
f Training needed
Truiperature Control Procedures
a T4 ardi 010i 100.k (0 J 1 'Is or 1{75S
h ichcal lc :6.51: 07 grexer
1.401' or gremer
king "empe'.olure
('id
Temperature Control Equipment
r Fish: mer:nolor.er (?ro.z.e-1:"pe
g Adcqua:c cq.opmen! le ma; mine krod emperatures
, '1,14.1md
h
S:Juliier Chlorine
15:11;1X7:11Uft*
Concenoxion Exposure
--• • — •—
Qualtrrar) Ammonium
1 NA:: ••01.!0:C
t. H01 waLer ar.act p:cs,.re dSev‘aev dri)a:
L. hack %Thor:aye
r • -
• ;.
Adecr,Lite riiraber. Imafon, design
it ..\ ,sesr.c:e
SiAi‘p& iiir),Eig des ices
E.‘ lacm...c01 1.1sec's or rodcraN
Pcs:ILLIc app.xxion
per...
Iy uNc:1
1,N ViRON lf-:-•:1A1. HE ALEH SPECIALIST
CPD fOrrt RF001-1 rev E 02/01 `--)
a Orina1 comainer, roped!, Libried
h Food protected from comaminaoun
a. Food conlact
b Nontixxi-contac! sJrfaci.,.
c Di,hwashing facihoes
. • • - • .• ' -
RefrIg(71i111011unirs pros Ided %kith a... -curate. corisn't.umi, 'me" roc flIC7,..1
!') ...imach:ric provided •01.... IN
C Chen:W:1i kis prov:deu. accessible
Food-corilact surfaces
b. Nonfood-Coniact scrface, d
j_ Utensils provided, used. stored
b. Single service arucies il.rpeased. Lsed
c. No reuse of singlc service arres
Pairnising
b_ Garbage aril refuse
C. Floors, ceilings
d [Agra:rig
[ Locker rooirr
inair:Acreif
ScpAraiiin
rc,ii1io...uuiler./0.:
t). Linen p:opurlyrcd
NOTES!
•
1-1 FD BY
Fri.o 1..
�:�13I.[IS1I I�II:I�'1'
COLORADO, `ARTMENT OF PUBLIC EA LTH AN' IVIRONMEN1'
R1iTA._ r'OOD F.STABLISIMENU INSPECTIOi • ._LPORT
Page - 2 of -I--
CITY FIRM 1U ' DATE
ITEM
REMARKS
CORRECT BY
c>uc1q�-
Waki
J1
l l I&zi�fl (SYI IAk 1 1 Le L�L'1'1� ;w 1
i fll rn)el m3+G 1
y 0 ne rnan� orbe -I-he_
k o
EN ' RONM1:NT-AL HEALTH S ECIALIST:
CPD form RF001-2 revC 02/01
RECEIVE[) HY:� �—
•
•
City Of Glenwood Springs
I01 W. 8h Street
GIenwood Springs, Co. 81601
RE: Glenwood Tramway Co.
To Whom It May Concern:
Garfield County
BUILDING & PLANNING DEPARTMENT
On Thursday, April 10, 2003, We did the Tramways, Gas, Water and DWV, test's on the
over head lines. IT ALL PASSED. Gas held 120psi. for 15 min. Water held 120psi. for
15min. DWV held 80psi. for 15min. If there are any Question please give me a call at
945-8212 ext.1610. We only did a pressure test on the lines.
Sincere)
Timothy A. ' olliday
Building Inspector
108 8th Street, Suite 201, Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601
(970) 945-8212 (970) 285-7972 Fax: (970) 384-3470
RECEIVED
� WEST SLOPE TESTING & INSPECTIONFFR 0 3 1003
3177 Glendam Dr BGARFIELD COUNTY
UILDING & PLANNING
Grand Junction, CO 81504
Phone: 970-434-6988
Cell: 970-260-2844
1-31-03
Andrew Schwaller
Building Official
108 8th st., suite 201
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
•
Page 1 of 1
Please find enclosed final inspection reports for structural
welding & high strength bolting inspections tramway
building. Chuck was at the job sitep at the
when I was there the other
day, and said he would issue a letter statingthathe had
& approved any changes noted on my d reviewed
questions please give me a call, reports. If you have any
Thank You; Doug Young
•
West SIope Testing & Inspection
41'3177 Giendam Dr.
Grand Junction, CO 81504
Phone: 970-434-6988
Cell: 970-260-2844
Report #15
Page 1 of 1
Daily Inspection Report
Date: 1-29-03
Client: Glenwood Tramway LLC
Project: Tramway Building
Contractor that Performed Work: Pioneer Steel Inc.
Testing of shop fabrication or field work at job site: Field
Report: Main level) Visually inspected the welds at the
modifications performed at the bar joists at the tramway car
entrance & exit area.
0 The welding appeared to be as shown on the drawings
provided by Poma of America & was of acceptable quality
except as noted below.
Two welds were missing at the center plate to the joist seat
angle connections & some additional welding needed to be done
at a few of the bracing rod to angle connections. Also two joists
were not yet completed. The joists & welds above will be
reinspected when they are completed.
Inspector/Technician: Douglas E Young
�r!'i1':ffd�
/ o4 a
I Dwc1 E.'IOUKS
9607C91
West Slope Testing & Inspection
IP 3 177 Giendam Dr.
Grand Junction, CO 8I504
Phone; 970-434-6988
Cell: 970-260-2844
Report #16
Page 1 of 1
Final Ins ' ection Re ' or
Date: 1-30-03
t
Client: Glenwood Tramway LLC
Project: Tramway Building
Contractor that Performed Work: Pio
Testis of sho fabrication or fief neer Steel Inc.
Report: Main ley I ns d work at job site: Field
welds at th � Finished the visually inspection of the
e modifications performed to the barjoists at
tramway car entrance & exit area. J the
0 The welding appeared to be as shown on the
provided by Poma of America & drawings
To the best of my knowledge this
was of acceptable quality.
completes the structural
welding & high strength bolting inspectionsat this project. The
welding & high strength bolting
knowledge acceptableper the �,�, as to the best o#' my
UBC & the A WS D1.1 Workmanship provisions of the
structural welding code. To the best of
my knowledge any changes or additions not
drawings had been approved by& shown on the
the structural engineer for observed by Chuck Peterson
structural adequacy.
Inspector/Technician: Douglas E Young
•
•
•
WEST SLOPE TESTING & INSPECTION
3177 Glendam Dr
Grand Junction, CO 81504
Phone: 970-434-6988
Cell: 970-260-2844
1-25-03
Andrew Schwaller
Building Official
108 8th st., suite 201
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
ECEWED
JAN 9 P ,, {
BUIIDING COUNTY
BANNING
Page 1 of 1
Please find enclosed inspection report for last weeks
inspections at the tramway building. !received your phone
message & have informed Chuck that the modifications to the
bar joists at the tramway car entrance & exit will require special
inspection. After this work is inspected 1 will send you a final
report.
Thank You; Doug Young
O West Slope Testing & inspection
3177 Glendam Dr.
Grand Junction, CO 81504
Phone: 970-434-6988
Cell: 970-260-2844
Date: 1-21-03
Client: Glenwood Tramway LLC
Project: Tramway Building
Contractor that Performed Work: Pioneer Steel Inc.
Testiin of sho fabrication or field work at sob site: Field
Report: Main level) Visually inspected the remainder of the
welds at the C channels to the bar joists & visually inspected the
deck fastening to the C channels at the tramwa loadin
0 where concrete was to be placed. y g area
Lower level) Visually inspected the welding at the additional
support tubing added at this level.
The welding & fastening inspected above was e acce tablper
the applicable codes & specifications. p
In addition to the above inspections 1 also tested three of the
A325 3/4" x 2" bolt, nut, and washer assemblies that were used
on the project in a Wilhelm Skidmore bolt tension testing
device. The results indicated AISC specification conformance.
Dail Ins ' ection Re ' ort
Report #14
Page 1of1
•
Inspector/Technician: Douglas E Young
West Slope Testing & Inspection
53177 Glendam Dr.
Grand Junction. CO 81504
Phone: 970-434-6988
Cell: 970-260-2844
RECEIVED
JAN 1 r 2003
GARFEELO COUNTY Pae 1 of 1
BUILDING & PLANNING g
Report #13
Daily Inspection Report
Date: 1-10-03
Client: Glenwood Tramway LLC
Project: Tramway Building
Contractor that Performed Work: Pioneer Steel Inc.
Testing of shop fabrication or field work at job site: Field
Report: Main level) Visually inspected some of the welds at the
C channels to the bar joists & on the guard railing at the
tramway loading area. Some of the welds at the C channels were
sot yet completed.
The welds inspected above were acceptable per the applicable
codes & specifications.
11)
Inspector/Technician: Douglas E Younglq i,
g �'�`
•
West Slope Testing & Inspection
IP 3177 Glendam Dr.
Grand Junction. CO 81504
Phone: 970-434-6988
Cell: 970-260-2844
Report #12
Page 1 of 2
Daily Inspection Report
Date: 1-8-03
Client: Glenwood Tramway ILC
Project: Tramway Building
Contractor that Performed Work: Pioneer Steel Inc.
Testing of shop fabrication or field work at job site: Field
Report: Main level) Visually inspected the welds at the steel
tubing above the floor level at gridlines F & G. Visually
inspected the welds at the stairs & Iandings.
0 Upper level) Visually inspected the welds at the X bracing that
was field welded, and at the stairs & landings.
Roof level) Visually inspected the high strength bolting at this
level.
The welding & bolting inspected above appeared to be
incompliance with the drawings, and was acceptable per the
applicable codes/specifications except as noted below.
1) 3" channel had been substituted for the 1" threaded X bracing r
rods at one location between the upper & roof level.
2) The I" threaded X bracing rod had been field butt weld
spliced at gridline E between the upper & roof level. The
finished welds appeared to be of acceptable quality, but I was
not present at the time of welding to determine the internal
quality.
am 3) Some of the bolts at the beam to column seats on the roof
level had not been fully tightened (the ends of the TC bolts were
not twisted off). The steel erector was unable to get their
•
•
page 2 oft
tightening device on some of these bolts &
wrench tightened only at some to the bolts were
joist girder to the column connections
Also the bolts at the
necttons were only tightened to the
snug tight condition (ends not twisted off in some
the joist drawings call for these connections locations) as
bolts were only to hold the connection in to be welded & the
welded. place until it was
4) Where the stair stringers were to bear &
girders at the lower & main level thereweld to the joist
modifications. had been some
Per the verbal conversation with the structural
Petterson the above conditions were a engineer Chuck
the stair stringer was Welded tot he toecceptable except at were
of the bar joist angle on
the main level. Chuck wanted some additional
support at this area, bearing or
Inspector/Technician: Douglas E Young
f /7-7
i West Slope Testing & InspectionRECEIVE
3177 Glendora Dr. D
Grand Junction, CO 81504
Phone: 970-434-6988
Cell: 970-260-2844
Date: 1-2-02
Client: Glenwood Tramway LLC
Project: Tramway Building
Contractor that Performed Work: Pioneer Steel Inc.
Testin of sho fabrication or field work at job site: Field
Report: Upper level) Visually inspected the high strength
bolting at the beam to column connections.
Roof level) Visually inspected the welds at the joistirders to
• the column seats & the bar joists to the joistgirders g
line A. Visually inspected the Puddle weldsalong grid
at the sloped roof deck between & sidelap fastening
grids A & C.
The welding, bolting, and fastening inspected above was
acceptable per the applicable codes & specifications.
Inspector/Technician: Douglas E Young Z:
JAN 0 8 2003
AFIELD COUNTY
BUILDING & PLANNING
Dail Ins ' ectlon Re s ort
Report #1 I
Page 1 of 1
•
•
in
West Slope Testing & Inspection
gliF3177 Giendam Dr.
Grand Junction, CO 81504
Phone: 970-434-6988
Cell: 970-260-2844
Dail Ins f ection Re , ort
Date: 12-26-02
Client: GIenwood Tramway LLC
Project: Tramway Building
Contractor that Performed Work: Pioneer
Testin of sho fabrication or field Steel Inc.
work at'oh site: Field
Report: Main Level) Visually inspected the
guardrail. Welds at the South
Upper Level) Visually inspected the welds at
support columns to the beams &joistthe canopy
missed informed the steel erector girders. One column was
for of the missed welds & they
welded this joint as required.
The welds inspected above were found to be
the AWS welding codes.
acceptable per
Report #10
Page 1 of 1
Inspector/Technician: Douglas E Young J
ja West Slope Testing & Inspection
IIIS 3177 Glendam Dr.
Grand Junction, CO 81504
Phone: 970-434-6988
Cel1: 970-260-2844
Date: 12-23-02
Client: Glenwood Tramway LLC
Project: Tramway Building
Contractor that Performed Work: Pione
Testis of sho fabrication or fieX er Steel Inc.
Report: U er Level n • d work at 'oh site: Field
} FiIshed visual Inspection of the PJP
welds at the
column splices.
Roof Level) Visually inspected the welds
0the beams &columns at this level. Visuallyat the roll clips to
at the joist girders to the seats on inspected the welds
the columns from grids C to E.
Two of these welds were missed informed
they finished these welds. Visualthe steel erector &
Visually inspected the welds at the
sloping bar joists to the joist girder along
Inspected the puddle welds & sidelap gridline C. Visually
fastening at the roof
decking from grids C to E.
The welds inspected above were found to
the AWS welding codes. be acceptable per
Inspector/Technician: Douglas E Young
RE CEIVED
JAN 0 6 2003
GARFIELD COUNTY
BUILDING & PLANNING
Dail Ins • ection Re, ort
Report #9
Page 1 of 1
West Slope Testing & Inspection
0 3177 Glendam Dr.
Grand Junction, CO 81504
Phone: 970-434-6988
Cell: 970-260-2844
•
Report #8
Page 1 of 1
Dail Ins s ection Re ort
Date: 12-19-02
Client: Glenwood Tramway LLC
Project: Tramway Building
Contractor that Performed Work: Pioneer Steer Inc.
Testis of sho fabrication or field work at 'of) site: Field
Report: U er Level) Observed some of the
performed at the PJP (partial joint welding being
P penetration) column splices &
at the roll clips welded to the beams & columns. Visually
inspected some of the above welds. Some of the above welds
were not yet completed these will be inspected at a later date.
The welds inspected above were
found to be acceptable per
the AWS D1.1 structural welding code.
Inspector/Technician: Douglas E Young
West Slope Testing & Inspection
3177 Glendam Dr.
Grand Junction, CO 81504
Phone: 970-434-6988
Cell: 970-260-2844
Report #7
Page 1 of 1
Dail Ins s eCtjon Re
Date: 12-18-02 ort
Client: Glenwood Tramway LLC
Project: Tramway Building
Contractor that Performed Work:
Testis of sho fabrication Pioneer Steel Inc.
or field work at 'ob site: Field
Report; Roof } Observed some
performed at the bar joists to beams &of the welding being
joist girders at this Ievel.
Visually inspected the above welds from
others were not yet completed.IP m gridline C to E. The
e
The weldseted.
IP TA above were found to be acce table
1.1 structural welding code. p per
•
Inspector/Technician: Douglas E Yo (7)Ung
AWS'
OC
c; COJGEA; t.1OUN6
96970151
CWI
West Slope Testing & Inspection
0 3177 Glcndam Dr.
Grand Junction, CO 81504
Phone: 970-434-6988
Cell: 970-260-2844
Report #6
Page 1 of 1
Daily Inspection Report
Date:12-12-02
Client: Glenwood Tramway LLC
Project: Tramway Building
Contractor that Performed Work: Pioneer Steel Inc.
Testing of shop fabrication or field work at job site: Field
Report: Main floor level) Observed the welding being
performed at the C channels to the bar joists & at the C channel
cross members North of gridline C at the tramway Ioading area.
Ah area was tented to keep the steel from getting wet at the
areas to be welded. The welds were of acceptable quality & met
the requirements of the AWS DI.3 sheet welding code.
•
Inspector/Technician: Douglas E Young .;
w
f;
1fc <.\
tt F.Y01/1166mM
West Slope Testing & Inspection
.3177 Glendora Dr.
Grand Junction. CO 81504
Phone: 970-434-6988
Cell: 970-260-2844
Report #5
Page 1 of 2
Dail Ins ' ection Re s ort
Date:12-10-02
Client: Glenwood Tramway LLC
Project: Tramway Building
Contractor that Performed Work: Pioneer Steel
Testin of sho fabrication or field Inc.
Report: Lower Level Visually inspected
at 'ob site: Field
cted welds at column base
plates to plates anchored to concrete caissons a
Visually along gridlines F
& G (see item 2 report #2).
inspected welds at new
• columns welded to beams along gridline 0.
Main floor level) Finished the visual o ins ecti
puddle welds & sidelap fasteningfrom inspection of the deck
visual inspection of PIP welds agrids C to G. Finished
inspected welds at new columns
column splices. Visually
olumns welded to beams along gridline
0. One of these columns at grid D.3/0 had a stack
shims added under the baseplate due of solid steel
p to the column being too
short. The shim pack was welded alonglength the
to the beam, and to the column base to each other,
plate (this fix was approved
thru Chuck Peterson). Observed some of the welding & fitting
being performed on the
guard railing.
Up er floor level) Visually inspected most of th
welds & sidelap fastening. Some of the weldse deck puddle
opening areas were covered with around the stair
Tater date.
plastic & will be inspected at a
• Work being performed on
the steel frame of the building
appeared to be in general conformance with the structural
1
•
•
page 2 of 2
design, joist & deck drawings available at th
& deck fastening inspected above was the job site. Welding
puddle welds & some sidelap• acceptable (note a few
fastening required repairs these
repairs were made, reinspected, and then found d to be
Inspector/Technician: Douglas E Young
&AI/ f 9-i
West Slope Testing & Inspection
IMP 3177 Glendam Dr.
Grand Junction, CO 81504
Phone: 970-434-6988
Cell: 970-260-2844
Report #4
Page 1 of 1
Date:12-Dail Inspection Re ort
4-02
Client: Glenwood Tramway LLC
Project: Tramway Building
Contractor that Performed Work: Pioneer Steel Enc.
Testis of sho fabrication or field work at job site: Field
Report: Lower Level) Visually inspected welds at joist girders
to column seats (notes on joist drawings called forirde
welded to seats). Visually inspected welds at g s to be
ofjoist girders to stabilizer bottom cord angle glle
plates on columns (stabilizer plates
were welded to bottom cord angle at one side per Chuck
Peterson instructions).
AlgialgairaI) Inspected the same welds as above at joist
girders to column seats & joist girders to stabilizerlate
Upper floor level) Inspected the same welds as on s
level & main level at joist girders to column seats & joist girders
to stabilizer plates. Also inspected some misc. welds at steel
tubing close to the stair openings.
Work being performed on the steel frame of the building
appeared to be in general conformance with the erection,
joist &
deck drawings available at the job site. Welding
was acceptable per A WS D1.1 structural inspected above
welding code.
inspector/Technician: Douglas E Young ,9
c,4"
West SIope Testing & Inspection
11.0 3177 Glendam Dr.
Grand Junction, CO 81504
Phone: 970-434-6988
Cell: 970-260-2844
•
Date:12-2-02
Client: Glenwood Tramway LLC
Project: Tramway Building
Contractor that Performed Work: Pioneer
Testin of sho fabrication or field Steel Inc.
work at 'ob site: Field
Report: Lower Level) Observed the
removal of the column at
grid D.3/0. A new column was to be added
with canopy attachments. close to this location
Main floor level) Reinspected the weldsh
at the bar joists to foist girders alongtat required repairs
report #2). The welds were found grid line G (see item no. 3
to be acceptable. Also noted
that additional anchors had been installed at the ledger angle to
concrete tramway base.
U per floor level) Observed the welding i
Joists to the beams & joist girders. After n progress at the bar
completed I visually inspected thethe welding was
Work being performed above welds.
on the steel frame of the buildin
appeared to be in general conformance with the g
deck drawings available at the job site.erection, joist &
was acceptable per AWS D1.1 Welding inspected above
structural welding code.
RECEIVED
DEC 1 0 2002
GARFIELD COUNTY
BUILDING & PLANNING
Dail Ins s ection Re ort
Report #3
Page 1of1
fe Inspector/Technician:
Douglas E Young'" r'•r(3
West Slope Testing & Inspection
• 3177 Glendam Dr. � �� Report #2
Grand Junction, CO 81504���
Page 1 of 2
•
Phone: 970-434-6988 `i�C 0 2 2002
CelI: 970-260-2844�o,�NN
Gp,RF1E►-� P�N1NG
g��ING
Dail Ins s ection Re ort
Date:11-26-02
Client: Glenwood Tramway LLC
Project: Tramway Building
Contractor that Performed Work: Pioneer Steel Inc.
Testin of sho fabrication or field work at 'ob site: Field
Report: 2nd flo r level or main flo r Ievel) Observed the steel
erection work that was in progress on this level. Received
reviewed, and verified that the welders performing welding on
the project were properly certified/qualified per A WS D1.1
D1.3 structural welding&
codes. Reminded welders of the proper
welding electrode storage procedures (rod oven was in use),
preheat requirements, and that weldingwas
on steel that was wet from rain or not to be performed
snow. Visually inspected
welds at bar joists to beams, and bar joists to joist girders from
grids A to C & E to G. Visually inspected anchoring of leder
angles at concrete tramway base. Four 3/4" diameter expansion
aanchors were used per side (on the north side one anchor on
missing 1 will verify that anchor is added on another vi was
i
Verified that high strength bolts found to visit).
were tightened (see report be loose on prior visit
#1).
Work being performed on the steel frame of the building
appeared to be in general conformance with the erection,
deck drawings available at the job site except as notedlow. &
Welding inspected above was acceptable P below.
structural welding code except as notedper A WS D1.1
p below (see page 2).
page 2 of 2
•
1) The steel decking on the ground floor level & part of the
main floor level was accidentally installed upside down. Per my
verbal conversation with the structural engineer Chuck Peterson
he informed me that structurally this condition would be
acceptable due to the supporting joists being on three foot
centers. VuIcraff the deck manufacture was also informed and
they were to issue a Ietter attesting to the fact that the decking
being upside down would be acceptable.
2) Some of the concrete caissons that the steel columns attach
to at grid lines F & G were apparently mislocated. To locate
columns in the correct locations steel plates had been anchored
to the tops of the caissons. The columns were then moved over
to the right locations and they were to be welded to the plates.
Chuck Peterson had approved this fix.
3) A few of the joist to joist girder welds along grid Line G
needed repaired (incomplete fusion) these will be reinspected
after they are fixed.
Inspector/Technician: Douglas E Young
.rte\
A
QCI
rake E.1011116
96078131
•
1
Nov -26-02 09:20A
970 945-2977 P.02
RECEtyro &thy r
4o) West Slope Testing & Inspection Re ort #1
3177 Glendora Dr. p
Grand Junction. CO 81504 Page 1 of 2
Phone: 970-434-6988
Cell: 970-260-2844
Date: I 1-20-02
Client: Glenwood Tramway LLC
Project: Tramway Building
Contractor that Performed Work: Pioneer Steel Inc.
Testis of sho fabrication or field work at 'oh site: Field
Report: 1st floor level) Visually inspected welds at bar joists to
beams & embeded angles, column splices, roll clips welded to
beams & columns, field welded girder & beam seats at columns,
and deck puddle welds. Visually inspected high strength bolting.
A325 twist off type bolts had been used throughout. Joist girders
• were bolted to the column seats with two 3/4" A325 bolts these
bolts & the bolts at the other connections were fully
pretensioned with the splines twisted off The welding inspected
at this level was acceptable per the AWS D1.1 structural
welding code.
2nd floor level) Visually inspected welds at bar joists to
beams, some of the column splices, roll clips welded to beams &
columns, field welded base plates at columns, and some of the
deck puddle welds. Welding inspected at this level was in the
main room area directly above the first floor level other 2nd
floor areas were not yet complete. Visually inspected high
strength bolting in the same area. The welding & bolting
inspected above was acceptable except for two bolts that needed
tightening at the joist girder to seat connection at the center
column East end of building. Informed the steel erection
Daily Inspection Report
•
Nov -20-02 09:20A
v
•
•
970 945-2977 P_03
page 2 of 2
suppervisor (Matt) of pioneer steel of these bolts. Further
inspections will be performed as the work is completed.
Inspector/Technician: Douglas E Young
ri,P7
•
FIRE MITIGATION PLAN
Glenwood Caverns met with Ron Biggers of Glenwood Fire Department and Kelly
Rodgers of the Colorado State Forest Service to determine a fire mitigation plan. The
following items were determined to make up the plan:
1. Defensible space — Glenwood Caverns will maintain a defensible space 150 feet
downhill of the visitor's center and 80 feet around the sides of the visitors center
and trail. Please see attached map detailing the location of the defensible space.
Within the defensible space envelope Glenwood Caverns will remove all dead
trees, the majority of oak brush, and thin the remaining trees where there will be a
minimum of 10 feet distance crown spacing. All native grasses will be kept below
a 6 -inch threshold.
2. Propane tank -- Glenwood Caverns will keep propane tanks at least 30 feet from
any structure.
3. Water Supply. The City of Glenwood Springs has agreed to supply potable water
to the lower terminal of the tramway. The Glenwood Tramway Company will
suspend a 1-1/2" diameter fiberglass waterline between the towers to the upper
terminal. Water pumped from the base will be stored in a 34,000 gallon tank for
domestic and fire fighting use. The water tank will be a sufficient elevation to
provide adequate fire flow pressure.
4. Building Construction. The upper terminal exterior walls will be constructed of
"Insulated Concrete Forms". Interior structural members will be open web steel
joists and girders. Floors will be metal decking with 3-1/2" of concrete. The
building appears to be Type II construction
5. FDC Locations. The building will be sprinkled. A fire department connection
will be provided.'
6. Sprinklers. The building will be sprinkled. The design will be performed by a
competent specialist and the design will be reviewed and approved by the Fire
Department.
7. Fire Alarms. A fire alarm system will be installed.
8. Kitchen Hood Fire Protection. If a kitchen grill is installed, it will be build with
the appropriate fire suppression system.
•
•
•
File notes 9-10-2002 Glenwood Tramway
Chuck Peterson submitted an amendment to his permit to change the exterior wall
on 8.26.02. See letter dated 8.26.02 from Chuck. The amendment involved a UL
des. U407 1 hr non Toad bearing curtain wall. After several attempts to
communicated via phone, 1 sent Chuck a letter dated 8.29.02. via fax. We
received a fax back from Chuck utilizing a different UL listed wall via fax on the
same day. Specifics requested in our letter and phone conversations were not
included. Additional phone conversations promoted a visit from Rob Classen a
local architect. Rob asked us what our concerns were with the material submitted.
Rob and [ discussed the issues. 1 echoed our letter of 8.29.02 and added that the
structural aspects of the exterior wall were not included in any of the submittals. 1
expressed to Rob that we could not approve the wall assembly with the structural
parts missing. Rob seemed to understand the issues and left.
On 9.9.02 Chuck dropped off revised steel framing and foundation plans. The
plans included a note stating the use of UL457 1 hr. wall. He included additional
information related to the UL listing. I reviewed the material that day and
requested details or sections showing how the 1 hr. wall would attach and fit into
the structural columns and beams. The plans submitted were not clear. Chuck
dropped off a single detail that also was not very clear. We discussed increasing
the width of the studs to allow for two layers of sheet rock to lap over the columns
and beams on the inside of the wall. 1 said I did not know if 1 layer of the Durock
would work on the outside of the wall. Chuck said he would do some research
and get back to me.
On 9.10 Ken Hunt an architect from Grand Jct. called with questions on how the
tramway building was rated. I told him V -I hr. He questioned if the exterior wall
needed to be 1 hr due to the sprinkler system. 1 told him that it needed to be one
hr. as per code and that the fire flow requirements also required a I hr. wall. 1
referred him to Ron Biggers. Art Hougland also stopped by and offered to
review the submittal of 9.8 with 1CBO. Ron Biggers called regarding his
meeting with Chuck. We discussed fire flow quantities and the limited access and
water related to the project.
Additional File Notes Glenwood 'frim
As per request from Ron Biggers, I requested additional plans from Chuck and
gave Chuck an up date on amended exterior wall 9.13.02 via fax.
•
•
•
9.17.02 Steve Beckley stopped by to ask if I had spoken with Ron Biggers re. the
sprinkler system. He said that he and Ron had worked out the details. I said that
Ron had not called and we discussed the wall system. I explained that Art
Hougland was involved with the wall review and that we had sent the system to
ICBG for their recommendation. Steve explained their desire to amend the
approved wall system. I explained some of the issues related to our review.
9.18.02 Ron Biggers called to say they had worked out the water with the
sprinkler and a V -N building. Also Ken Hunt called to get an update on
the permit application. I told him the permit was issued 2 weeks prior
and that we were reviewing an amendment to the approved plans for a
different exterior wall. He asked if the wall needed to be 1 hr. with the
sprinkler system. I said we thought it needed to be. I explained the
submitted wall system and that we had sent it to ICBG for their
recommendation. He asked how he could help with the process. I
mentioned that Chuck had not worked out the details of including the
structural columns and beams. This detail was still pending. Ken asked
if he could contact Art H. regarding the above. 1 gave him Art's phone
number. I called Art and left a message that Ken would be calling.
9.23.02 The design engineer, Chuck Peterson, submitted a letter amending the
construction of the building to a Type 11 One hour rating. As per Art Hougland's
Plan Analysis dated 9.25.02, this change in construction allows for a non -rated
non -load bearing exterior wall. This all took place in order to amend the permit
on the construction of the exterior wall. As per Art, ICBO thought it would be
code compliant.
9.26.02 The amendment to the plans related to the change in construction type
and the amended exterior wall plans dated 9.8.02 were approved.
10-1-02 Faxed letter requesting payment for additional plan review and plans for
Ron Biggers
10-16-02 faxed letter requesting info on special inspectors and inspections that the
engineer did for the structural concrete. Also included info on type 2 buildings
and a local special inspection service.
11-12-02 Steve Beckley stopped in to talk to Mark Bean. I asked Steve how the
building was going. Ile said they were putting up the 2" floor. 1 gave a copy of
my letter to Chuck regarding special inspectors to Steve. [told him the special
inspector could not be Chuck and that the special inspectors need to be involved
during the construction. Steve said he would look into it and asked if I knew
anyone local. I gave him Becky Gremillion's card.
•
•
•
11-22-02 Faxed letter to Chuck 2"d notice regarding structural concrete
inspections and Special Inspections.
11-22-02 Stopped by Chuck's office to drop off letter faxed. Chuck did get the
fax and had prepared a submittal for a special inspector and wrote a
letter regarding the foundation inspections.
11-25-02 Called Chuck asking for the phone no. of Douglas Young the special
investigator. Also asked for the results of the concrete testing. He said
they did not test the concrete. I said it needed to be tested as per plans.
Chuck said he could test it with a Swiss hammer and submit the results
to us.
11-25-02 Called Doug Young about the inspections for the tramway building.
He said Chuck had called him and that he had done an inspection last
week. I said that I was calling to check him out in a sense. He said that
he had worked with Russell with the City of Glenwood. He said he
also worked with H.P. Geotech at the Rifle school. He said he was
inspecting the bolting and welding for Chuck. 1 asked if he had worked
with Pioneer or visited Vulcraft's shop. He had worked with Pioneer
before but had not worked with Vulcraft. 1 asked if Pioneer was having
any trouble putting the steel together. He said they did have to field
alter some plates on the bottom of columns. Doug said he was told
Chuck directed the work and that he thought the welds looked good. I
expressed my concern that he might not be inspecting enough if we left
up to Chuck to call him. Ile said Chuck had called him because of us
requiring a special inspector and that Chuck had hoped one inspection
would be enough. I said continuous inspections would probably be too
much but 1 hoped they would call him to view the process while it was
being done. I said to do as many inspections that he thought necessary.
Doug mentioned Chuck might not want to pay for too much. I said to
have Chuck call me if there was a problem. 1 faxed a letter to Chuck
approving Doug as a special inspector and clarifng the concrete testing
requirements.
I called Dan Hardin at H.P. regarding Doug Young. Dan said they liked
his work and used him for their inspections.
11-27-02: Sent letters to Chuck and Doug regarding special inspections.
1-09-03: Met with Ray Lyons and Kelly. Ray is the contractor on the tramway.
Ray was asking if the first two floors could be finished and C.O.ed for Spring
Break. My response was that the permit would need to be completed prior to
C.O. I said 1 would have to review the situation with Mark Bean and get back to
•
•
r
them. We also discussed the separation of the crawl space from the rest of the
lower floor and the use of ABS and PVC in commercial buildings. I called them
with answers to both questions later in the day. We reviewed the 1 -hour wall
requirements and the 20min door requirements. We also discussed egress
requirements and an outdoor egress staircase. They mentioned the use of foam in
the exterior walls. I said the plans would need to be amended and reviewed for
compliance. I looked up the use of foam in a Type 11 building after they Icft.
'there may be some problems, which 1 will bring up with Chuck Peterson.
1.10.03: Ray stopped by to discuss location of 20 min door from main floor to
lower floor. We also discussed the fire corridor and the glass shown in the wall.
We referred to the plans. I gave him a copy of Art's letter of Review of Revisions
7/17/02. 1 also gave him a copy of the code relating to foam insulation in the
exterior walls.
1.13.03: Talked to Mark Bean about completion requirements and my discussion
with Ray Lyons. He concurred that the building would have to be complete with
the exception that tenant improvements limited to nonstructural partitions could
be done at a later date. Faxed a letter to Chuck Peterson with the requirement.
Also clarified spray on insulation and crawlspace ventilation in the letter to
Chuck.
1.23.03: Dave, Steve, and I visited the upper terminal building. We met with Ray
Lyons and walked through the building. The structural shell was completed.
Concrete still needed to be poured on the top floor. We discussed the crawlspace
venting, crawlspace access, roofing and generally reviewed the work to date with
Ray. Some of the steel stud walls were up on the main floor and the sprinkler
installers were laying out their plumbing. Several areas of concern were noted
and included in a letter faxed to Chuck Peterson on 1.24.03.
1.27.03: Chuck Peterson stopped by the office with a question regarding venting
of the crawl space. We reviewed the section in the code. He contented that since
there was not any wood in the crawlspace that venting would not be needed. I
said that condensation on the electrical panels would not be good. Chuck thought
moisture would not collect in the crawl space. I said with time it would be a
problem based on personal experience. Water from the ground or through the
wall or a leaky waterline would be trapped. We reviewed the provision allowing
for a reduction in venting if a vapor barrier was applied to the floor of the
crawlspace. He seemed content with following that recommendation. 1 asked
him if he received my fax of 1.24.03 regarding the roof drains and other areas of
concern. He said that he changed his phone and fax and had not seen it. l made a
copy of the letter. He read it and we discussed the roof design. He agreed to have
an engineer review the roof drainage.
•
•
•
2.5.03: Met with Ray Lyons. We discussed the need for timely submittals. I said
1 would send a letter to Chuck requesting that he get the required submittals to us.
Ray said he would try to promote Chuck to do the same. We agreed we did not
want any delays in construction because of info not submitted to the County. We
reviewed the 1 -hour requirements for walls and ceilings. 1 gave Ray a copy
Sec 1004.3.4.1 on corridors. We also discussed the thermal barrier over the foam
in the floor/ceiling assembly. He will submit info on the thermal barrier. 1
reminded him that the foam had not been approved yet. Ray said he hoped to
have a framing inspection in two weeks.
2.6.03: Reviewed file for submittals outstanding from tramway project. Drafted
a letter to Chuck tried to fax but fax did not go through. Called Chuck and E -
Mailed letter. Requested new address in E -Mail
2.12.03: Did some inspections of the building. Did a framing inspection of the
crawl space, lowest floor framing and framing of upper floor and roof. Tim
reviewed some lower floor rough in sewer and drain. For the framing review, we
verified the column and beam requirements as shown the plans for the areas list
above. We also checked required cross bracing in the walls and noted locations
of extra post and cross bracing. Items called out on the plans were checked off on
the plans for columns, beams and cross bracing. We left a correction notice
requiring the grouting of underneath the base plates at the foundation, a question
for the engineer regarding bearing of the girders, and another request for
submittals relating to the spray foaming of insulation. We discussed updated
floor plans for the lowest level, which were dropped off later in the day by Ray.
We also discussed the location of emergency exit illumination and exit signs with
the contractor. Ray said Ron Biggers had been up discussing emergency exit light
requirements earlier. I reminded Ray to wire for fire alarms prior to any
sheetrock
Ray dropped off plans later in the day. I reminded him of the class B roof
requirements and showed him the requirements for the interior finish flame
spread. I also gave him another copy of the submittal requirements for the foam
insulation being used in a Type 11 construction.
2-18-03: Ray dropped off samples for the interior finishes for the Kitchen drop
ceiling, Restaurant drop ceiling and Retail drop ceiling. All samples were class A
fire spread and suitable for the building. Ray also said they were dropping the
foam spray insulation as they have room in the furred out walls for batt insulation.
I gave Ray a copy of the plan review for his use.
2-19-03: Reviewed revised floor plans for all three levels. Added redlines for
fireplace, HC lift, draft stops and reference to original plan redline items.
•
3-20-03: Reviewed file for an up date to what submittals are pending and other
issues relating to the final inspection. E-mailed Chuck with a list of things to be
done prior to final in hopes of heading offa delayed opening.
4-8-03: Ray dropped off pending submittals. Submittals relative to our letter of
1-24-03 were not included and the roof covering fire resistance rating was not
clear. Faxed Chuck a request for clarification and called the GenFlex company
for clarification on the roof covering.
4-15-03 Received follow-up submittals via Ray Lyons to our letter of 4-8-2003.
The areas of concern were reviewed and stamped by Chuck rather than an
independent engineer. I called Chuck and explained our position requiring an
independent review. We discussed the areas of concern and Chuck agreed to have
it done. He was not sure if he could get it done by C.O. I said that would be best,
but would allow it to be submitted post C. O. Ray and I discussed Occupancy
Load signs for the restaurant and winter garden assembly areas.
4-17-03: Reviewed plans prior to C.O. several things were changed or not needed
that were indicated on the original approved plans. E-mailed Chuck with
requested clarifications. Also a question came up with the number of roof drains.
4-18-03: Tim myself and Fred Jarman did a final inspection on the tramway. We
reviewed the plans and made a check list from the project notebook to review the
construction. There were several items of work still on going related to the
installation of handrails, concrete work outside and the posting of signs in the
building. A correction list was developed and left with Ray Lyons. Draft on file.
Also sent out e-mails to fire dept. and city regarding their final inspections prior
to our C.O.
4-21-03: Ray stopped by office and dropped off information on septic and
handicap lift that was requested on 4-17. High Country Engin. will provide
details for the pretreatment. Ray and I discussed the draft stop in the ceiling floor
assembly on the main floor. It was agreed the steel stud and fiberglas batt system
above the retail area would suffice as long as it had no open gaps and was
supported well. Other areas in this attic area had sound insulated walls assemblies
consisting of steel studs fiberglas insulation, and sheetrock that are more than
adequate for draft stop construction. Chuck P. stopped by and dropped off
independent engineer review of roof brackets and pier supports. He also had
revised plans for the sewer treatment and a letter from f ligh Country approving
the installation of the system.
4-23-03: Teresa, Dave and 1 did the final inspection on the upper tram building.
We checked off the punch list made on 4-18 and looked for any other items. The
building was complete and no additional correction notice was required.
4-24-03: E-mailed final request to city and fire dept. for any comments prior to
finalizing the project. Russell at the city said lower building would be receiving a
TCO. Ron with the fire district said some submittals were pending but that the
inspections were done and passed. Prepared C.O. for signing. Sent Chuck a e-
mail regarding tenant finish and C.O..
4-25-03: Signed C.O.
•
Page 1 of 1
Andy Schwaller
From: Charles Peterson (chuck@tramway.net]
Sent: Friday, April 25, 2003 8:00 AM
To: Andy Schwaller
Subject: RE: You Are There
Andy,
Thank you for your kind words. We are committed to following all County rules on all tenant finishes. It is our
current goal to have the upper level completed by fall in order to allow group meeting. Naturally full plans will
be submitted and all inspections completed as required.
Once again thank you for your thorough review of the project.
Come up and see us anytime.
Chuck
Original Message
From: Andy Schwa Aer [maitto:aschwaller@garfield-county.com]
Sent Thursday, April 24, 2003 5:13 PM
To: chuck@tramway.net
Subject You Are There
Chuck,
We will have a C.O. ready by noon tomorrow. I have a call into John Martin to see if he would like to
present it to you and Steve personally. Any way it goes, you will have it in hand on Friday.
Just a reminder, that tenant finish permits will be required prior to occupation of the tenant finish
areas. Also something you may already be aware of that we noticed going down the tram on
Wednesday, was that in high winds the bundle of 3 utility fines smack together. In between the
triangular supports, the fiberglass tubings separate and rapidly pop onto themselves. It is fairly loud
and may or not be a problem
I am going to beat the politicians in saying that the tram complex is a huge asset to both the city and
the state.
I hope you are repaid 2000 fold to your contribution in blood, sweat and tears.
Andy
4/25/2003
•
•
Andy Schwaller
From: Andy Schwaller
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2003 5.13 PM
To: 'chuck@tramway.net'
Subject: You Are There
Chuck,
Page 1 of 1
We will have a C.O. ready by noon tomorrow. I have a call into John Martin to see if he would like to present it
to you and Steve personally. Any way it goes, you will have it in hand on Friday.
Just a reminder, that tenant finish permits will be required pnor to occupation of the tenant finish areas. Also
something you may already be aware of that we noticed going down the tram on Wednesday, was that in high
winds the bundle of 3 utility lines smack together. In between the triangular supports, the fiberglass tubings
separate and rapidly pop onto themselves. It is fairly loud and may or not be a problem.
I am going to beat the politicians in saying that the tram complex is a huge asset to both the city and the state.
I hope you are repaid 2000 fold to your contribution in blood, sweat and tears.
Andy
4/24/2003
•
Page 1 of 1
Andy Schwaller
From: Ron Biggers [rbiggers@ci.glenwood-springs.co.us]
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2003 4:25 PM
To: Andy Schwaller
Subject: RE: Tramway Project
Andy, I still have not gotten completion paperwork from Excel Fire Protection (sprinkler system), Meridian (fire
alarm). These may seem like small things however once they get their CO they get forgotten about The
sprinkler system paperwork is a minor item, the alarm and contact information on it are more important. I
contacted both these vendors yesterday and both said they would get the paperwork to me yesterday. Has of
this writing I have not received these items. I do not want to hold the project up for these items but it would be
good to get a promise from Ray Lyons or Steve Beckley that would have some teeth so this gets completed
after they get their C of O.
F Y.I. Last night we were paged out and responded to the top building because the alarm system
malfunctioned.
If you want to discuss this I will be in until 5pm. 384-6433
Ron B.
Original Message ----
From: Andy Schwaller [mailto:aschwaller@garfield-county.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2003 11:33 AM
To: rbiggers@d.glenwood-springs.co.us; Russell A. Grance
Subject: Tramway Project
Gentlemen,
• Any updates relative to the above? They have met our requirements with only a few loose ends to tie up
by tomorrow. Let me know if you have any concerns.
•
Thanks,
Andy
4/24/2003
•
•
Andy Schwaller
From: Russell A. Grance (russellg c@ci.glenwood-springs. co. us]
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2003 12.36 PM
To: Andy Schwaller
Subject: RE. Tramway Project
Andy,
Page 1 of 1
It appears that a TCO will be issued for the Tram Office Building. As-builts pending, landscaping etc.. The
building is OK
Russell
Original Message
From: Andy Schwaller [mailto:aschwaller@garfield-county.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2003 12:33 PM
To: rbiggers@ci.gienwood-springs.co.us; Russell A. Grance
Subject: Tramway Project
Gentlemen,
Any updates relative to the above? They have met our requirements with only a few loose ends to tie up
by tomorrow. Let me know if you have any concems.
Thanks,
Andy
4/24/2003
•
•
•
CiJ r TA -04b14. C•iit7 B -X144)/ $67
_ii3PtC-17%3-749-id - 03
C* --- .Fc Rey, 203 RF o430Ayl' 2411X!
ei2e-;14./S fi_14-7q74 /21.4.(.3 IMC-444(Airjex.i.dx, •
.14.xV rt Q eamcliA Q14-ace.got..1
Cif Clog G) _ 3—z .
P
Trth, gifir Rip
io._ C- ALS -C,
. ¢ nus. l ,c ter'; t r�;— 1 ,gnt
Fee. .Pr 4n— X3-3 _ 7_3e77A -
atker_Srp. v_
Cr_cr)4F Fitt
•
4
. ODDO ENGINEERING, INC.
•
MEMORANDUM
oddo
engineering
To: Andrew Schwaller, Garfield County Building and Planning
From: Robert Oddo P.E., Oddo Engineering, Inc.
Job: Glenwood Tramway Upper Building
Date: April 21, 2003
Andrew,
Per Chuck Peterson's request Oddo Engineering, Inc. has provided an independent review of
the two interior posts and the eccentric placement of the steel columns on the pier foundation.
From the photos that Chuck has provided the steel post connections appear to be constructed as
indicated on the steel shop drawings. The steel post angle brackets holding up the roof bar joist
have not been altered from the steel shop drawings for Columns 3D-3.4 and 3D-5.5.
After reviewing the as built foundation drawings dated 11-02-02 and the Risa foundation
design output the foundation pad locations are acceptable as built between grids 0 and 8 along
F and G. The as built drawing displays the design Ioads and the amount of eccentricity of the
center line of the steel column with respects to the center line of the 18" dia. concrete column
and pad footing. We verified that these values where used in the Risa program to calculate the
new applied bearing pressure with the eccentricity loading. The maximum bearing pressure
indicated in the output was 4550 psf, which seems to be acceptable for bearing on bedrock.
In summary, the photos of the steel columns appear to he constructed per the steel shop
drawings and the bearing pressure calculations are accurate for the applied Toads and
eccentricity.
If you require further information or have additional questions please feel free to contact us.
AO OVIV.ZEG45,,,4
„�q 11111 l l I l l l f dlJ/�j,
Best regar t fib 000
8085 I—
%• tee?e% •. �`-
/d, J/0NA. �E.NG�
ip Bob Oddo
Cc: Chuck Peterson
7I0 Cooper Avenue • Suite 200 ♦ Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
(970) 945-1006 ♦ Fax (970) 945-2977 ♦ E -Mail info@oddogws.com
Page 1 of 1
40 Andy Schwaller
From: Russell A. Grance [russellg@ci.glenwood-springs.co.us]
•
r
Sent: Monday, April 21, 2003 8:50 AM
To: Andy Schwaller
Subject: RE: Tramway
Andy,
I just called and talked to Chuck Peterson and informed him to stop by City Hall and start the final routing
process (paperwork) for a C.O. They have been in contact with a planner as to the necessary requirements
that are outstanding (updated landscaping plans, gravel parking, Mylar's for improvements). The Building
Department has been out to the site and performed a pre -final on the ticket office and have one issue with a
one-hour assembly. They have received there final electric from the state. I will keep you up to date when I
receive more information.
----Original Message
From: Andy Schwaller[mailto:aschwaller@garfield-county.com]
Sent: Friday, April 18, 2003 3:02 PM
To: Russell A. Grance
Subject: Tramway
Russell,
The Glenwood Tramway will be requesting a final next week. Has the company fulfilled it obligations to
the city with regards to water, sewer, and the lower terminal budding? They are getting close with the
upper building, but it may come down to the wire for their opening. If possible, I would like to get written
approvals from as many other entities as soon as they become available to ease the C.O. process. Let
me know if you have any questions or comments.
On another subject, thanks for leading the way with the I -code education. We would like to be included
with the seminars. I am sure we share many of the same contractors and architects, but there are
some that do not work in Glenwood. Regarding BEST cards, as we are not a home rule charter, we do
not require licensing of contractors.
Thanks again,
Andy
4/21/2003
•
•
•
Andy Schwaller
From: Ron Biggers [rbiggers@ci.glenwood-springs.co.us]
Sent: Friday, April 18, 2003 5:27 PM
To: Andy Schwaller
Subject: RE: Glenwood Tramway
Andy,
Page 1 of 1
Yes, 1 checked out and gave a finial inspection to the sprinkler system, kitchen hood Ansul system and fire
alarm system. All systems passed. The only pieces holding them up on my end is getting the final inspection
paper work from the installing vendors. The vendors know what I require and I ask Ray Lyons to remind them
to bring copies with them but none of them had it. A couple will be mailing me a copy another will email me a
copy. When I get it all, I will let you know. If you have not heard from me before you make out the C.of O.
please contact me.
Ron B
[Ron Biggers] From: Andy Schwaller [mailto:aschwaller@garfeld-county.com]
Sent: Friday, April 18, 2003 2:11 PM
To: rbiggers@cl.glenwood-springs.co.us
Subject: Glenwood Tramway
Ron,
The tramway will be requesting a final next week. Have they met your requirements with the sprinkler,
kitchen hood, alarm, and fire mitigation? Once they have, if you could please send me a note, I will
include it in the file and they will be closer to a C.O.
Thanks for your time,
Andy
4/21/2003
1``
!
I!�
II
•
q3
edgL 7 - Wim^
M
I ,:Cit4a4irk-itdlife.12&1..
I
•
f? *quo 4 P Q14* 4ErreL -P1 oI,y
,•I� o, g
X81, �l �4's.�rbgi"
604 /rosi--
�r1.±412%( 3t'°tL
%.443 *#.41'1'IT
tiligut �
.
.Id.,
a. 5 t.war,t4._C-6.k. 1 ,!Arym — -
- vewctri € k.
r • Z Gort,ca 1.A7S
14. pct 4M___a 14 -
fJCILS-47/23 A./ ou
4-
4-
AD ti._'47)149 ?Pit__.112;144
I!d L44 - -.
t' M__
t;
il t.
iilzo.. '
,-
�
R.
• , .. .. , _ -.
? ►r wf-1� �; s ,
. .. ,.
isr go -F-
2 Fes- (—
_____•
tF
1
4
-37
? Z.
, •
•
•
it
- .
-
,
•
4'.
ii
c4 µ,ms `'""'�
ait-a-r-r-Fr,k3,4 CO r - / P--rbt.t.•
P . andr. t ,fes' cadx.0 A..ttc r n,{-.
3 C - .„ C,„tizr,64Nild-A Att_ift_r_f_ p.,,,,,z,,,o___,.._,,,,
P • • 1 tip rd / .. ` LIQ } �_
2. r4LItetzA'12 L)_ 1,.
._.
._s-,
�l t5 >c4)____M1 c.3 L— G
Jg. 1141 tf 6. nn �� ���
�, 14 . ,1 , 11.
g_ :... a 1 . ►".
��. C Dula
'1 Awl m Pd)•-; a AI (.; C �a, ,
1 • "' ti _•5�:>K.1lds,��7:1,.a.. k - egliz--
_F ,4
�3. cc,_.fj Cl23_.
G4„..,41....0,44,u. FF]O7"
44._47rauciarter____Evy
•
•
•
•
Glenwood Tramway LLC,
Mr. Andy Schwaller
Building Official
Garfield County
109 8th Street
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
RE: Tramway Terminal
Certificate of Occupancy
Dear Andrew:
The Glenwood Tramway LLC will purchase potable water from the City of Glenwood Springs. The water will be
pumped from the lower terminal in a fiberglass waterline that is suspended between towers. The waterline has been
installed and we have already filled our 34,000 gallon storage tank. The pumping system has been reviewed and
approved by Buddy Burns, City of Glenwood Water System manager.
During the original application, we anticipated using an ISDS system for waste water treatment and disposal. At that
time, the County Commissioners placed a maximum daily usage on the facilities based upon the submitted plans.
Since that time we have elected to utilize the suspended utility lines to bring gray water back into the City's sewer
system for treatment. High Country Engineering designed the pre-treatment and pumping system. The City of
Glenwood Springs has agreed to accept and treat the gray water. During the February 10th Commissioners meeting
we informed the Commissioners of our use of the City water treatment instead of the ISDS system. They removed
the maximum daily usage restriction. The system is now functional and we have successfully tested the system.
The upper level of the building is intended to be developed into meeting rooms as originally designed. Due to
financial constraints, we have not yet installed the handicap lift. Ilowever, the space for the lift remains in the
design, the support platform for the lift has been constructed and electrical wiring for the lift is installed. It is our
intent to install the handicap lift as originally designed before the upper floor meeting rooms are functional.
Thank you for your review and please call if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Glenw
Charles Pe on, P.F.
Manager
i:ldoc\permits\prcmit response 042003.doc
• P.O. Box 398 • Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 • (970) 945-2236 • FAX (970) 945-2977
•
•
•
Andy Schwaller
From: Andy Schwaller
Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2003 9:02 AM
To: 'chuck@tramway.net
Subject: Getting Ctose
Chuck,
Page 1 of 1
In review of the plans, several things need to be amended. 1 believe the ISDS system was substituted with a
tap into the city system. Please provide some details and verify if this was done. Also the plans show a
handicap lift. Is the lift installed? If not, due to the upper and lower floors being a tenant finish, a letter from the 1. 4
Glenwood Cavems agreeing to include the lift with any future tenant finish permits would suffice.
In further review of the roof drainage system, your letter of April 14, 2003 indicates that there are 4 six inches
drains and a scupper. The plans and our inspections reflect only 2 drains and a scupper. Please verify the
number of roof drains and have an independent engineer verify its design meets with code requirements.
Please call with any questions.
Yours truly,
Andrew Schwaller
Building Official Garfield County
4/17/2003
&antes 9-11 i u)3
• Steve Hackett
From: Andy Schwager
Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2003 10:31 AM
To: Steve Hackett
Subject: FW: Getting Close
•
---Original Message—
From: Andy Schwager
Sent Thursday, April 17, 2003 10:29 AM
To: Andy Schwager
Subject FW: Getting Close
—Original Message -----
From: Charles Peterson [maitto:chuck@tramway.net]
Sent Thursday, April 17, 2003 9:33 AM
To: Andy Schwager
Subject RE: Getting Close
Page 1 of 2
Andy,
I will get you a letter on the ISDS and the handicap lift.
There are two 6" roof drains set at roof level. These two drains have independent drainage paths to the
outside. There are two additional inlets that are set 4' above the elevation of the roof drains. These inlets are
tied directly to the two 6' roof drains and are intended to ensure that even if the primary roof drain inlets are
clogged, that water will flow from the roof. There is a single 12" wide by 4" high scupper to drain the roof in
case all 4 roof drain inlets are clogged.
I have contracted with Oddo Engineering to review the offset on the deck foundations and the two upper floor
roof support columns. I hope to have his report to you by Monday.
Thanks for your review.
Chuck Peterson
—Original Message—
From: Andy Schwager[mailto:aschwaller@garfietd-county.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2003 9:02 AM
To: chuck@tramway.net
Subject Getting Close
Chuck,
In review of the plans, several things need to be amended. I believe the 1SDS system was
substituted with a tap into the city system. Please provide some details and verify if this was done.
Also the plans show a handicap lift. Is the lift installed? If not, due to the upper and lower floors being
a tenant finish, a letter from the Glenwood Cavems agreeing to include the lift with any future tenant
4/17/2003
•
•
Page 2 of 2
finish permits would suffice.
1n further review of the roof drainage system, your letter of April 14, 2003 indicates that there are 4
six inches drains and a scupper. The plans and our inspections reflect only 2 drains and a scupper.
Please verify the number of roof drains and have an independent engineer verify its design meets
with code requirements.
Please call with any questions.
Yours truly,
Andrew Schwaller
Building Official Garfield County
4/17/2003
410
Glenwood Tramway LLC.
April 14, 2003
Andrew Schwaller
Building Official
Garfield County
108 8th St.
Glenwood Springs, Co 81601
Via Email aschwaller@garfield-county.com
RE: Glenwood Tramway LLC
Upper Terminal Permit
Dear Andy:
Thank you for your thorough review of the upper terminal of the tramway. This is an important building
and deserves your attention to detail. This letter report is in response to your April 8th letter requesting
additional information.
• The roof of the structure is drained by four six inch diameter roof drains. Two of the drains, which are
tied to the primary drains, are elevated by 4" and intended to provide backup drains in case the primary
drains become clogged. As a tertiary backup, there is a 12" wide by 4" high overflow drain through the
parapet wall with the invert elevation set 4" above the primary drain elevation. As shown on the attached
calculation sheet, the 100 year rain event will result in the following volume of water on the roof:
Time of Concentration Volume of Water (CF)
2.5 minutes 120
5.0 minutes 218
10.0 minutes 349
Since the primary roof drains are set at an elevation of 4" below the invert elevation of the overflow wall
weir, there is 436 cubic feet of storage on the roof before the overflow weir will begin to drain the roof.
However, the design loading for the roof is 55 psf. 'Ibis is equal to a uniform water depth of 10 inches of
water which is equal to water storage of 2625 cubic feet of storage. The overflow weir has a capacity of
1.39 cfs with a head of 4". The end result is that the roof has the capacity of supporting the 100 year
storm without overflowing. In addition if all of the four internal drains pipes clog, the overflow weir has
the capacity of ensuring that only a maximum of 4" of water will impound on the roof. All additional
water will drain from the roof.
The second issue that you raised is two items noted in the West Slope Testing and Inspection reports. "rhe
first issue apparently referred comments contained on report #12. Response to these items is outlined
below:
. P.O. Box 398. Glenwood Springs, CO 81602. (970) 915-2236. FAX (970) 945-2977
•
April 15, 2003
Page 2 of 2
Item #1. The selection of the cross bracing size was based upon standard available configurations
not on ultimate loadings. The 1" bar specified has a cross sectional area of' .785 square inches. The
installed 1.3x3x1/4" angle has an area of 1.44 square inches. Since the installed members are designed to
resist only tension forces, the angles are more than sufficient to resist the imposed loads.
Item #2. The inspector confirmed that the installed welded connection is sufficient to support the
loads. Ilis only concern is that he was not available to actually witness the welding. Since he confirmed
that the welders had the appropriate certification and that no other welds were observed that did not meet
industry standards, it is reasonable to assume that the welds were of acceptable standards.
Item #3. The inspection indicated that some of the TC bolts were not twisted off. This was the
result of inadequate clearance to allow the installer to wrench tighten the bolts to the point that they
twisted off the bolts. These bolts were not designed to resist moment but were intended to resist shear.
The shear strength is not affected by the actual tightening of the bolts. Therefore, the inability of the
installer to twist off the TC nuts will not affect the structural integrity of the building.
The second issue relates to the placement of the foundation piers below the deck. This issue was observed
in report #2. Due to surveying error, some of the piers were as much as 4" from the desired location. As a
result, the centers of some columns were as much as 4" from the center of the piers. The result is an
eccentric loading of the piers. The original foundation design assumed a bearing pressure of 3000 psf.
The actual bearing condition is on fractured rock with a conservative bearing pressure of 5000 psi.
Therefore, any minor eccentric loading on the piers which may result in non-uniform hearing on the
underlying support pads would have adequate support on the rock foundation. In addition, the maximum
4" eccentric loading of the columns remain well within the hearing surface of the 18" diameter surface of
the pier. The pier therefore remains in compression with no tension zones.
Once again, I appreciate your review of the project. The completed building benefited from this review.
Please give me a call if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
GLENWOOD TRAMWAY, LLC
laCharles Peterson, P.E.
Manager
i:ldoc\permits\permit response 04 1403.doc
•
Mr. Charles Peterson
Glenwood Tramway Company
P.O. Box 398
Glenwood Springs, CO 81602
Via email: chuck@tramway.net
Dear Chuck,
Garfield County
BUILDING & PLANNING DEPARTMENT
aschwallerAgarfi cld-county. co m
April 8, 2003
• Thank you for the recent submittals. ']here are several items that we need additional information on and
request that an independent engineer not as close to the project as you address these areas.
Specifically, we are concerned with the possible problem should the roof drains fail and in general, the
design of the roof drainage system. Please have an engineer verify the roof drainage is designed as per 614
Sec 1506 97 UBC. Sec 1611.7 97 UBC and Sec 1100 IPC should be reviewed for compliance as well.sf A)
We are also requesting that several field alterations to the structure be reviewed and approved by an a tL
independent engineer. Several post angle brackets holding up the roof bar joist were altered on the top 1-21
floor and several post base plates missed proper alignment onto the concrete piers under the deck portion
of the building. Please have these connections and bearing points reviewed for compliance with the
design and code.
Thanks again for the recent submittals. Feel free to call with any questions.
Yours truly,
Andrew Schwaller
Building Official
•
•
TRAMWAY ENGINEERING
302 Eighth Street, Suite 325
P.O. Drawer 160
GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81602
(970) 945-2236 FAX 945-2977
JOB
SHEET NO
CAI CULATED BY
CHECKED BY
$CALL
OF. 2
%DAT( 11'«(a3
DAT E
s
GAAA/0aa
00�
c.
CGl,Gv4f1rrQN S
leo v:- 2C,E
ST*(Vp Aft TIT
t,
to
8
-7
Tart A-4
.. ate 1.4
� vnA-T4CoN
06.0.4.4E o W 12.-oOP
31 So 4
.) P c.v4t
—1#4tiz
11
'S (1 10
�o•o 5
?5-1-01:4.44‘
Ss
4 33
C l ao Yecnv )
C cs )
12.0
319
TIO XI XI 1 SIM Sims: TA 1:Plow
w
TRAMWAY ENGINEERING
302 Eighth Street, Suite 325
P.O. Drawer 160
GLENW00D SPRINGS, CO 81602.
(970) 945-2236 FAX 945-2977
JOB
SHEET NO Z OF'
DATE. . _.. 4. f �3
CALCULMLD BY
OM -OKI -014Y DATE
SCAT E
Lrlii
2^'b
.P.C, Cavy 4 c .Ty
s
z-
(1)
Q z. l 19 cis
-oe CAPA- car
P (Lt 4" fe4E7.0,A) CiP of Circ%
,
VOLuE
-"SI .5
1,047 R„Z h
(APP4mc.)
1.097 (ls)a ((1(1 0 = z.t8
TJ'AL Stcr CZ) t .\)
1(%) _ `f3� -'t1
C� �-cRA,E V 0 cC+� C G' S
100 ton.
0ENW4I P+411.1.
Zrz West Slope Testing & Inspection
3177 Gl endam Dr.
Grand Junction, CO 81504
Phone: 970-434-6988
Cell: 970-260-2844
Daily Inspection Report
Report #2
Page 1 of 2
Date:11-26-02
Client: Glenwood Tramway LLC
Project: Tramway Building
Contractor that Performed Work: Pioneer Steel Inc.
Testing of shop fabrication or field work at job site: Field
Report: 2nd floor level or main floor level) Observed the steel
erection work that was in progress on this level. Received
reviewed, and verified that the welders performing welding. on
i the project were properly certified/qualified per AWS D1.1 &
D1.3 structural welding codes. Reminded welders of the proper
welding electrode storage procedures (rod oven was in use),
preheat requirements, and that welding was not to be performed
on steel that was wet from rain or snow. Visually inspected
welds at bar joists to beams, and bar joists to joist girders from
grids A to C & E to G. Visually inspected anchoring of ledger
angles at concrete tramway base. Four 3/4" diameter expansion
anchors were used per side (on the north side one anchor was
missing I will verify that anchor is added on another visit).
Verified that high strength bolts found to be loose on prior visit
were tightened (see report #1).
Work being performed on the steel frame of the building
appeared to be in general conformance with the erection, joist &
• deck drawings available at the job site except as noted below.
Welding inspected above was acceptable per AWS D1.1
structural welding code except as noted below (see page 2).
j
West Slope Testing Inspection
Ins ection
• 3177 Giendam Dr.
Grand Junction, CO 81504
Phone: 970-434-6988 BEST COPY
Cell: 970-260-2844
Report #12
Page 1 of 2
Daily Inspection Report
Date: 1-8-0
Client: Glenwood Tramway LLC
Project: Tramway Building
Contractor that Performed Work: Pioneer Steel Inc.
Testing of shop fabrication or field work at job site: Field
Report: Main level) Visually inspected the welds at the steel
tubing above the floor level at gridlines F & G. Visually
inspected the welds at the stairs & landings.
• Upper level) Visually inspected the welds at the X bracing that
was field welded, and at the stairs & landings.
Roof level) Visually inspected the high strength bolting at this
level.
The welding & bolting inspected above appeared to be
incompliance with the drawings, and was acceptable per the
applicable codes/specifications except as noted below.
1) 3" channel had been substituted for the 1" threaded X bracing
rods at one location between the upper & roof level.
2) The 1" threaded X bracing rod had been field butt weld
spliced at gridline E between the upper & roof level. The
finished welds appeared to be of acceptable quality, but I was
not present at the time of welding to determine the internal
quality.
3) Some : of the bolts at the beam to column seats on the roof
▪ level had not been fully tightened (the ends of the TC bolts were
not twisted off). The steel erector was unable to get their
BEST COPY page 2 of 2
n the ground floor level & part of the
1) The steel decking o installed upside down. Per my
main floor level was accidentally .neer Chuck.Peterson
verbal conversation with the structural engineer would be
,
me that structurally this condition w e foot
he informedsupporting joists being on three acceptable due to the supp
anufacture was also informed and.
centers. Vulcraft the deck m the fact that the decking
they were to issue a letter attesting to
being upside down would be acceptsble.a steel columns attach
Some of the concreteTo locate
2) caissons that th apparently mislocated.
to at grid lines F & G. were apP y had been anchored
columns in the correct locations steel platesmoved over
of the caissons. The columns were then he p fates.
tothetops were to be welded to t
to the right locations and they ,
Chuck Peterson had approved this fix. • d line G
• girder welds along grid 3)A few of the joist to joist
needed repaired (incomplete fusion) these will be reinspected
after they are fixed.
Insp ectorf technician: Douglas E Young
page 2 of 2
S tightening device on some
of these bolts & the bolts were
wrench tightened only at some Locations. Also the bolts at the
joist girder to the column connections were only tightened to the
snug tight condition (ends not twisted off in some Locations) as
the joist drawings call for these connections to be welded & the
bolts were only to hold the connection in place until it was
welded.
4) Where the stair stringers were to bear & weld to the joist
girders at the lower & main level there had been some
modifications.
Per the verbal conversation with the structural engineer Chuck
Patterson the above conditions were acceptable except at were
the stair stringer was welded to the toe of the bar joist angle on
the main level. Chuck wanted some additional bearing or
support at this area.
Inspector/Technician: Douglas E Young
•
•
•
April 4, 2003
Mr. Andy Schwaller
Building Official
Garfield County
109 8th Street
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
RE: Glenwood Tramway Terminal
Dear Andy:
mw,
� Lf
EHOOMEEHORde
RECEIVED
,3
GARFIELD COUNTY
BUILDING & PLANNING
The purpose of this letter is to respond to issues raised in your Feburary 6th and March 20th letter
regarding submittal of additional information for the GIenwood Tramway upper terminal.
1. All interior walls have been constructed on 4" or 6" metal studs with 5/8"X shcetrock
on both sides. The assembly is in conformance with GA File No. 1200 from the
Gypsum Association Fire Resistance Design Manual and qualifies as a one hour fire
assembly.
2. Updated plans have been submitted on February 12, 2003.
3. The foundation concrete was tested to verify conformance with the submitted foundation
plans specification. All samples exceeded the design strength of 3000 psi. A copy of the
test results is attached.
4. Foam insulation was not used in the construction of the building. Therefore, no
additional information for the foam insulation is necessary.
5. The roof assembly is a Class B or better. Attached is documentation to verify this
assembly.
6. Attached is a copy of all of the field inspections of the structural steel framework. All
discrepancies that were noted in the inspection reports have been reviewed by myself
and have been noted or repaired to an acceptable standard.
P.O. Box 398 • Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 • (970) 945-5138 • FAX (970) 945-5138 •chuck@tramway.net
•
We appreciate the Garfield County Building Department's review and inspection of the project.
I feel that your input has been valuable and has resulted in a better and safer project. Thank you
for your services.
Sincerely,
TRAMWAY ENGINEERING, LTD.
Charles R. eterson, P.E.
Structural Engineer
CRP/jlw
ICOM
P.O. F3ox 398 • Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 • (970) 945-5138 • FAX (970) 945-5138 •chuck@tramway.net
•
•
•
Glenwood Tramway Building
Concrete Testing Report
Method Used - Concrete Test Hammer
Date tested 04/03/03
Location Reading Strength
(psi)
North Wall Under Tram Deck
North Wall outside of Deck
South Wall
West Wall
North Wall
39
36
38
42
41
41
39
44
36
39
40
40
44
42
41
38
39
40
41
38
38
38
38
4810
4258
4626
5362
5178
5178
4810
5730
4258
4810
4994
4994
5730
5362
5178
4626
4810
4994
5178
4626
4626
4626
4626
I certify that I have conducted the concrete testing to
the proper standard and all of the concrete strength
exceeded the 3000 psi strength required by foundation
spectication
BEST COPY
• Roofing Systems
GenFlex
•
•
800-443-4272
1722 Indian Wood Circle
Maumee. CH 43537
www.genflex.corn
Qescriptian i
GenFlex TPO roofing membrane consists of a non -haloge-
nated Thermoplastic Polyolephin membrane manufactured
with a 9 x 9, 1.000 denier polyester reinforcement. This
membrane comes in widths of 1.9 m (6.25'), 2.4 m (8'). 3.0 m
(10'), and 3.7 m (12.4') and in lengths of 30.4 m (100'), and
in thicknesses of 1.1 mm (0.0451 and 1.6 mm (0.0601.
PROPERTY
_ _
TEST
METHOD
PHYSICAL
PROPERTIES
Cola (race)
White, CharCool
Black, or Grey
!Weight
L
I ASTM D-751
45 mi] - 1.03 k9/rn2
(0.21 tb/ft2)
00 mil --1.41 rcg'm= .�
(0.29 IMP) I
Thickness,
nominal
ASTM D-751
1.1 mm (0.045') ,
1.5 mm (0.0601
Thickness Over Min
Scrim, mm, (in)
ASTM 0-4637
Optical Method
0.381 mm (0.015').
0.046 mm (0.0181.
Typical
Breaking
Strength, min.
ASTM D-751
1kN (225Ibf), Min.
X1.4 kN (310 1bf.), Typ.
r
! Elongation, ASTM D-412
Ultimate.
- (unreinforced)
500%
• Tearing Strength, ASTM 0-751
I min.
245 N (55 Ibf.). Min.
445 N (100 lbf.). Typ.
! Prooerties after
HeatAg102
ASTM 0-751
Per
I Breaking
iStrength. min.
Tearing
i Strength, min.
I
ASTM D-573
1
1.0kN (225Ibf.), Min- 1
1.4 kN (310 Ibf.), Typ,
245 N (55Ibf.), Min.
445 N (100 Ibf ), Typ.
Brittleness point rr•,ax.
ASTM D-2137
-40'C (-40'F)
IiOzone Resistance,
: no cracks
ASTM 0-1149
Pass
'i Water Absorption,
i max
t
ASTM 0-471
t 2%
[Linear Dimensional
Change. Max. -_-.
ASTM 0-1204 t 2%
Weather
Resistance, no
cracks or crazing
AS1M G-151
ASTM G-153
AS' M G-154
- ^
Pass
Propene§ After
Weathering
Breaking
: Strength, min.
ASTM D-751
1.0 kN (2551b1.) I
Reflectivity
ASTM E-903
White - 78.3 i!
Grey -44.6
1Piinchira FTAA +n- r I inn ACII
CharCool Black - 62 p
tte
agoff
GenFlex TPO
1.1 mm (0.045'}
1.5mm (0.060' j
P - 2
Jnsfeilattoni
IPO may be installed as a mechanically attached, a fully
adhered, or a ballasted system. Please consult current TPO
specifications for specific application needs.
Preparation of Substrates;
• Substrates must be clean. dry, smooth. free of sharp edges.
fins, loose or foreign materials, nig, grease, and other
materials which may damage the membrane.
• All roughened surfaces. which could damage yre mem-
brane, shall be repaired as specified to offer a smooth
substrate.
• All surfaoe voids crater than 'A" wide, shall be property
filled with an acceptable material.
PrEgitiCikatil
Available Sizes:
White and CharCool Blade
▪ 1.9m(6.25")x30.4m(100')
• 2.4m (8') x 30.4 m (100')
• 3.0(10')x30.4m(1001
• 3.7m (12_4') x 30.4 m (100)
• 3.0(10')x30.4m(100)
tuff Sheet Widths:
• 939 mm (3r) x 30.4 m(100)
• 1.2m(4)x304m(100)
• 1.5m(5')x304m(100)
• 1.9 rn (6.25') x 30.4 m (100')
Grey
• 3.0(10')x30.4m(100)
• 1.5 m (5') x 30.4 m (100') Half Sheet
Reinforced Flashing (Aft Colors):
• 152 mm (6') x 30.4 m (100')
• 457 mm (181 x 30.4 rn (100)
Storage: Store away from sources of punctures and physical
damage in original unopened packaging.
Assure that structural decking will support ire loads incurred
by the material stored on roof top The deck load limitations
should be specified by the project designer
e_r9cauhfensi
• Take care when moving, transporting, handling. etc„ to
avoid sources of punctures and physical damage
• Isolate waste products; such as, petroleum products.
greases. oils (mineral and vegetable) and animal fats from
tt►e membrane.
• Contact GenFlex Roofing Systems Technical Department
for specific recommendations.
6,4s 3 4.5- x.A. 4.L. . L/.5 7744 i43
41t f a'-41 4431.11It GL -PL/
Pouf" AD, Swsrfrn l $ao A 44 - 2
3 gz 72. �.s4
�' �•au,4uui! tohns Manville " „ "y ' tenea.
P�lroa; White". Firestone vil Building NRGY 1G , ax "Ply I" or "Multi -Max",
min. Products "Iso 95+GL". Atlas Roofingg' Apache Building in. thick Products
Membrane: — "GenFlex
ACFoam II , I-1/2 chick
GenFlex RM -F13", 40-100 mil (TPA).
Class A - Mechanically Fastened
t-sburgh Coming "FOAMGLAS" insulations are acceptable alternates
to any polyisocyanurate insulation in
of the "GenFlex II FRM" or "GenFlex II FRM-FR,. Classifications below.
1. Deleted.
2. Deleted.
3. eck: NC
RESP COPY
Insulation:
"ACFoam Ii
any thickness
Insulation:
Insulation:
Membrane:
TQ �� D Incline: 1/4
— Firestone Building Products "ISO 95+GL" 3 in- „
", "GenFlex ISO 3", "GenFlex Tapered ISO 3" �' ��Ply-1 'Atlas Roofing
GenFlex NB 3"or Apache "White Line",
— Glass fiber, 15/16 in. or perlite, 3/4 in.
(Alternate to all previous insulation) glass fiber, wood fiberboard or perlite 3-11
"GenFlex II EPDM", 45 mil bar anchor method. 4 ax.
4. Deck: NC
Incline: 1/4
Insulation: —Glass fiber, perlite or wood fiberboard, 3-1/4 in. max
Membrane: --
"GenFlex lex 1I EPDM", 45 mil, bar anchor method.
5•1eted.
5. Deleted.
7. Deleted.
Deck: NC
Incline: 1/4
Insulation (Optional): — Polystyrene, polyisocyanurateI ure
than
composite, perlite wood fiber, glass fiber or phenolic, no max thickness' perlite/Polyisocvanurate
Insulation: -- Wood fiber board, 1/2 in. thick min.
Membrane: — "GenFlex II EPDM", 45 or 60 mil (EPDM) or "GenFlex RM"PV
{ C); 48 or 60 mil.
Deleted.
). Deck: C-15/32
Incline: 1/.2
)174.base.ul.com/cgi-bin/XYV/template/LISEXT/1FRA1vtE/showpage.html?name= - ,
T GFC . R... 2/17/2003 7'2003
•
(8; . Deck: NC
.rc!1„44 - scooting Systems
BEST COPY
5. Firestone Building Products "ISO 95+GL".
p. 10
Page 35 of 47
Membrane: -- "GenFlex Black TPO", "GenFIex White TPO" or "GenFlex Grey TPO" (45 or 60 mil).
Incline: 112
Insulation (Optional): --- One of the following any thickness.
1. Poly isocyanurate.
2. Perlite.
3. Glass Fiber.
4. EPS.
Barrier Board: — Wood fiberboard (U2 in. min), I/4 in. min G -P Gypsum Dens -Deck® or 1/2 in. min
gypsum board.
Membrane: — "GenFlex Black TPO" or "GenFlex White TPO" or "GenFlex Grey TPO" (45 or 60 mil.
8S. Deck: C-15/32 Incline: 112
•
Insulation (Optional): — One of the following any thickness.
1. Atlas Roofing "ACFoam [I".
2. Rrnax "Multi -Max FA".
3. Johns Manville "ENRGY 2".
4. Apache Products "PYROX".
5. Firestone Building Products "ISO 95+GL".
Barrier Board: — 1/4 in. min G -P Gypsum Dens -Deck® with all joints staggered min of 6 in. from the
plywood joints.
Membrane: -- "GenFlex" Black TPO, "GenFlex" White TPO or "GenFlex" Grey TPO (45 or 60 mil).
89. Deleted.
90. Deck: C-15/32 Incline: 112
Slip Sheet: — Two layers Atlas Roofing "FR50".
0 Membrane: — "GenFlex Black TPO", "GenFlex White TPO", "GenFlex Grey TPO", 45 or 60 mil or
GenFlex RMS I(Pti C) 48 or 60 mil.
91. Deck: NC Incline: 2
•
RECEIVED DEC 0 2 2002
• WEST SLOPE TESTING & INSPECTION
3177 Glendam Dr
Grand Junction, CO 81504
Phone: 970-434-6988
Cell: 970-260-2844
r
11-29-02
Chuck Peterson
Glenwood Tramway LLC
PO Box 160
Glenwood Springs, CO 81602
Page 1 of 1
:ONM.
co
m
JV .D, Raitewelo
At? outd:
Please find attached inspection report for 11-26-02.
In addition per the phone message that I left you on 1 1-27-02
Andy Schwaller of the Garfield County Building Department
called me in regards to the special inspections that you had hired
me to perform on the Tramway Building. He indicated to me
that although they were not going to require an inspector on site
on a continuous bases that they did however want me to be there
on a periodic bases while the work was being performed in
addition to a final visual inspection of all welding & bolting. I
have some other jobs in the vicinity so I will be able to divide up
some of the travel fees. But the time that I have into this job will
be more than the 8 hours that we discussed. If you have any
questions please call me, or Mr SchwaIler said you can talk to
him about this issue. Thank You; Doug Young
RECEIVED Mn v 2
West Slope Testing & Inspection
am 3177 Glcndam Dr.
Grand Junction, CO 81504
Phone: 970-434-6988
Cell: 970-260-2844
Report #1
Page 1 of 2
Daily Inspection Report
Date:11-20-02
Client: Glenwood Tramway LLC
Project: Tramway Building
Contractor that Performed Work: Pioneer Steel Inc.
Testing of shop fabrication or field work at job site: Field
Report: 1st floor level) Visually inspected welds at bar joists to
beams & embeded angles, column splices, roll clips welded to
beams & columns, field welded girder & beam seats at columns,
and deck puddle welds. Visually inspected high strength bolting.
• A325 twist off type bolts had been used throughout. Joist girders
were bolted to the column seats with two 3/4" A325 bolts these
bolts & the bolts at the other connections were fully
pretensioned with the splines twisted off. The welding inspected
at this level was acceptable per the AWS D1.1 structural
welding code.
2nd floor level) Visually inspected welds at bar joists to
beams, some of the column splices, roll clips welded to beams &
columns, field welded base plates at columns, and some of the
deck puddle welds. Welding inspected at this level was in the
main room area directly above the first floor level other 2nd
floor areas were not yet complete. Visually inspected high
strength bolting in the same area. The welding & bolting
inspected above was acceptable except for two bolts that needed
• tightening at the joist girder to seat connection at the center
column East end of building. Informed the steel erection
page 2 of 2
0 suppervisor (Matt) ofpioneer steel of these bolts. Further
r
inspections will be performed as the work is completed.
•
•
Inspector/Technician: Douglas E Young
(4 f /v/7
West Slope Testing & Inspection
S 3177 Glendam Dr.
Grand Junction, CO 81504
Phone: 970-434-6988
Cell: 970-260-2844
Report #2
Page 1 of 2
Daily Inspection Report
Date:11-26-42
Client: Glenwood Tramway LLC
Project: Tramway Building
Contractor that Performed Work: Pioneer Steel Inc.
Testing of shop fabrication or field work at job site: ,Field
Report: 2nd floor level or main floor level) Observed the steel
erection work that was in progress on this level. Received
reviewed, and verified that the welders performing weldingon
the project were properly certified/qualified per AWS D1.1 &
i DI.3 structural welding codes. Reminded welders of the proper
welding electrode storage procedures (rod oven was in use),
preheat requirements, and that welding was not to be performed
on steel that was wet from rain or snow. Visually inspected
welds at bar joists to beams, and bar joists to joist girders from
grids A to C & E to G. Visually inspected anchoring of ledger
angles at concrete tramway base. Four 314" diameter expansion
anchors were used per side (on the north side one anchor was
missing I will verify that anchor is added on another visit).
Verified that high strength bolts found to be loose on prior visit
were tightened (see report #1).
Work being performed on the steel frame of the building
appeared to be in general conformance with the erection, joist &
deck drawings available at the job site except as noted below.
Welding inspected above was acceptable per AWS DI.1
structural welding code except as noted below (see page 2).
page 2 of 2
•
1) The steel decking on the ground floor level & part of the
main floor level was accidentally installed upside down. Per my
verba[ conversation with the structural engineer Chuck. Peterson
he informed me that structurally this condition would be
acceptable due to the supporting joists being on three foot
centers. Vulcraft the deck manufacture was also informed and
they were to issue a letter attesting to the fact that the decking
being upside down would be acceptable.
2) Some of the concrete caissons that the steel columns attach
to at grid lines F & G were apparently mislocated. To locate
columns in the correct locations steel plates had been anchored
to the tops of the caissons. The columns were then moved over
to the right locations and they were to be welded to the plates.
0 Chuck Peterson had approved this fix.
3) A few of the joist to joist girder welds along grid line G
needed repaired (incomplete fusion) these will be reinspected
after they are fixed.
Inspector/Technician: Douglas E Young 4 f.
•
West SIope Testing & Inspection
3177 Glendam Dr.
IP Grand Junction, CO 81504
Phone: 970-434-6988
Cell: 970-260-2844
Date:12-2-02
Client: Glenwood Tramway LLC
Project: Tramway Building
Contractor that Performed Work: Pioneer Steel Inc.
Testing of shop fabrication or field work at job site: Field
Report: Lower Level) Observed the removal of the column at
grid D.3/0. A new column was to be added close to this location
with canopy attachments.
Main floor level) Reinspected the welds that required repairs
• at the bar joists to joist girders along grid line Gsee item no.
( 3
report #2). The welds were found to be acceptable. Also noted
that additional anchors had been installed at the ledger angle to
concrete tramway base.
Upper floor level) Observed the welding in progress at the bar
joists to the beams & joist girders. After the welding was
completed I visually inspected the above welds.
Work being performed on the steel frame of the building
appeared to be in general conformance with the erection, joist &
deck drawings available at the job site. Welding inspected above
was acceptable per AWS D1.1 structural welding code.
Daily Inspection Report
Report #3
Page 1 of 1
0 Inspector/Technician: Douglas E Young r. 4
West SIope Testing & Inspection
3177 Glendam Dr.
Grand Junction, CO 81504
Phone: 970-434-6988
Cell: 970-260-2844
Report #4
Page 1 of 1
Daily Inspection Report
Date: I 2-4-02
Client: Glenwood Tramway LLC
Project: Tramway Building
Contractor that Performed Work: Pioneer Steel Inc.
Testing of shop fabrication or field work at job site: Field
Report: Lower Level) Visually inspected welds at joist girders
to column seats (notes on joist drawings called for girders to be
welded to seats). Visually inspected welds at bottom cord angle
of joist girders to stabilizer plates on columns (stabilizer plates
! were welded to bottom cord angle at one sideP er Chuck
Peterson instructions).
Main floor level) Inspected the same welds as above at joist
girders to column seats & joist girders to stabilizer plates.
Upper floor level) Inspected the same welds as on the lower
level & main level at joist girders to column seats & joist girders
to stabilizer plates. Also inspected some misc. welds at steel
tubing close to the stair openings.
Work being performed on the steel frame of the building
appeared to be in general conformance with the erection, joist &
deck drawings available at the job site. Welding inspected above
was acceptable per AWS D1.1 structural welding code.
1
Inspector/Technician: Douglas E Young oung 4tet.
•
West SIope Testing & Inspection
• 3177 Glendam Dr.
Grand Junction, CO 81504
Phone: 970-434-6988
Cell: 970-260-2844
RECEIVED DEC 1 8 20172
Report #5
Page 1 of 2
Daily Inspection Report
Date: 1 2-1 0-02
Client: Glenwood Tramway LLC
Project: Tramway Building
Contractor that Performed Work: Pioneer Steel Inc.
Testing of shop fabrication or field work at job site: Field
Report: Lower Level) Visually inspected welds at column base
plates to plates anchored to concrete caissons along gridlines F
& G (see item 2 report #2). Visually inspected welds at new
columns welded to beams along gridline 0.
0 Main floor level) Finished the visual inspection of the deck
puddle welds & sidelap fastening from grids C to G. Finished
visual inspection of PJP welds at column splices. Visually
inspected welds at new columns welded to beams along gridline
0. One of these columns at grid D.3/0 had a stack of solid steel
shims added under the baseplate due to the column being too
short. The shim pack was welded along the length to each other,
to the beam, and to the column base plate (this fix was approved
thru Chuck Peterson). Observed some of the welding & fitting
being performed on the guard railing.
Upper floor level) Visually inspected most of the deck puddle
welds & sidelap fastening. Some of the welds around the stair
opening areas were covered with plastic & will be inspected at a
later date.
• Work being performed on the steel frame of the building
appeared to be in general conformance with the structural
•
•
•
page 2 of 2
design, joist & deck drawings available at the job site. Welding
& deck fastening inspected above was acceptable (note a few
puddle welds & some sidelap fastening required repairs these
repairs were made, reinspected, and then found to be
acceptable).
Inspector/Technician: Douglas E Young g
West Slope Testing & Inspection
Aft 3177 Glendam Dr.
111. Grand Junction, CO 81504
Phone: 970-434-6988
Cell: 970-260-2844
Report #6
Page 1 of 1
Daily Inspection Report
Date:12-12-02
Client: Glenwood Tramway LLC
Project: Tramway Building
Contractor that Performed Work: Pioneer Steel Inc.
Testing of shop fabrication or field work at job site: Field
Report: Main floor level) Observed the welding being
performed at the C channels to the bar joists & at the C channel
cross members North of gridline C at the tramway loading area.
The area was tented to keep the steel from getting wet at the
110 areas to be welded. The welds were of acceptable quality & met
the requirements of the AWS D1.3 sheet welding code.
Inspector/Technician: Douglas E Young D�� r.
•
West Slope Testing & Inspection
3177 Glendam Dr.
Grand Junction, CO 81504
Phone: 970-434-6988
Cell: 970-260-2844
Report #7
Page 1 of 1
Daily Inspection Report
Date: 12-18-02
Client: Glenwood Tramway LLC
Project: Tramway Building
Contractor that Performed Work: Pioneer Steel Inc.
Testing of shop fabrication or field work at job site: Field
Report: Roof Level) Observed some of the welding being
performed at the bar joists to beams & joist girders at this level.
Visually inspected the above welds from gridline C to E. The
others were not yet completed.
The welds inspected above were found to be
acceptable per
P
the AWS DI.1 structural welding code.
Inspector/Technician: Douglas E Young
//y
QC Z
DOUGLAS LYQUM&
460;0131
•
West Slope Testing & Inspection
10 3177 Glcndam Dr.
Grand Junction, CO 81504
Phone: 970-434-6988
Cell: 970-260-2844
Report #8
Page 1 of 1
Daily Inspection Report
Date: 12-19-02
Client: Glenwood Tramway LLC
Project: Tramway Building
Contractor that Performed Work: Pioneer Steel Inc.
Testing of shop fabrication or field work at job site: Field
Report: Upper Level) Observed some of the welding being
performed at the PJP (partial joint penetration) column splices &
at the roll clips welded to the beams & columns. Visually
inspected some of the above welds. Some of the above welds
• were not yet completed these will be inspected at a later date.
The welds inspected above were found to be acceptable per
the AWS D1.1 structural welding code.
Inspector/Technician: Douglas E Young
•
•
West SIope Testing & Inspection
3177 Glendam Dr.
Grand Junction, CO 81504
Phone: 970-434-6988
Cell: 970-260-2844
Report #9
Page 1 of 1
Daily Inspection Report
Date: 12-23-02
Client: Glenwood Tramway LLC
Project: Tramway Building
Contractor that Performed Work: Pioneer Steel Inc.
Testing of shop fabrication or field work at job site: Field
Report: Upper Level) Finished visual inspection of the PJP
welds at the column splices.
Roof Level) Visually inspected the welds at the roll clips to
the beams & columns at this Level. Visually inspected the welds
• at the joist girders to the seats on the columns from grids C to E.
Two of these welds were missed informed the steel erector &
they finished these welds. Visually inspected the welds at the
sloping bar joists to the joist girder along gridline C. Visually
inspected the puddle welds & sidelap fastening at the roof
decking from grids C to E.
The welds inspected above were found to be acceptable per
the AWS welding codes.
0
Inspector/Technician: Douglas E Young % 4
West SIope Testing & Inspection
0 3177 Glendam Dr.
Grand Junction, CO 81504
Phone: 970-434-6988
Cell: 970-260-2844
Report #I0
Page 1 of 1
Daily Inspection Report
Date: 12-26-02
Client: Glenwood Tramway LLC
Project: Tramway Building
Contractor that Performed Work: Pioneer Steel Inc.
Testing of shop fabrication or field work at job site: Field
Report: Main Level) Visually inspected the welds at the South
guardrail.
Upper Level) Visually inspected the welds at the canopy
Isupport columns to the beams & joist girders. One column was
I missed informed the steel erector of the missed welds & they
welded this joint as required.
The welds inspected above were found to be acceptable per
the AWS welding codes.
Inspector/Technician: Douglas E Young 0044 t
i
West Slope Testing & Inspection
• 3177 Glendam Dr.
Grand Junction, CO 81504
Phone: 970-434-6988
Cell: 970-260-2844
Report #1 1
Page 1 of 1
Daily Inspection Report
Date: 1-2-02
Client: Glenwood Tramway LLC
Project: Tramway Building
Contractor that Performed Work: Pioneer Steel Inc.
Testing of shop fabrication or field work at job site: Field
Report: Upper level) Visually inspected the high strength
bolting at the beam to column connections.
Roof level) Visually inspected the welds at the joist girders to
the column seats & the bar joists to the joist girders along grid
• line A. Visually inspected the Puddle welds & sidelap fastening
at the sloped roof deck between grids A & C.
The welding, bolting, and fastening inspected above was
acceptable per the applicable codes & specifications.
Inspector/Technician: Douglas E Young U4V
•
West Slope Testing & Inspection
40 3177 Glendam Dr.
Grand Junction, CO 81504
Phone: 970-434-6988
Cell: 970-260-2844
Report #1 2
Page 1 of 2
Daily Inspection Report
Date: 1-8-03
Client: Glenwood Tramway LLC
Project: Tramway Building
Contractor that Performed Work: Pioneer Steel Inc.
Testing of shop fabrication or field work at job site: Field
Report: Main level) Visually inspected the welds at the steel
tubing above the floor level at gridlines F & G. Visually
inspected the welds at the stairs & landings.
Upper level) Visually inspected the welds at the X bracing that
was field welded, and at the stairs & landings.
Roof level) Visually inspected the high strength bolting at this
level.
The welding & bolting inspected above appeared to be
incompliance with the drawings, and was acceptable per the
applicable codes/specifications except as noted below.
1) 3" channel had been substituted for the 1" threaded X bracing
rods at one location between the upper & roof level.
2) The 1" threaded X bracing rod had been field butt weld
spliced at gridline E between the upper & roof level. The
finished welds appeared to be of acceptable quality, but I was
not present at the time of welding to determine the internal
quality.
3) Some of the bolts at the beam to column seats on the roof
level had not been fully tightened (the ends of the TC bolts were
not twisted off). The steel erector was unable to get their
page 2 of 2
• tightening device
g g on some of these bolts & the bolts were
wrench tightened only at some locations. Also the bolts at the
joist girder to the column connections were only tightened to the
snug tight condition (ends not twisted off in some locations) as
the joist drawings call for these connections to be welded & the
bolts were only to hold the connection in place until it was
welded.
4) Where the stair stringers were to bear & weld to the joist
girders at the Iower & main level there had been some
modifications.
Per the verbal conversation with the structural engineer Chuck
Petterson the above conditions were acceptable except at were
the stair stringer was welded to the toe of the bar joist angle on
•the main level. Chuck wanted some additional bearing or
support at this area.
Inspector/Technician: Douglas E Young
0
West Slope Testing & Inspection
di 3177 Glendam Dr.
Grand Junction, CO 81504
Phone: 970-434-6988
Cell: 970-260-2844
Report #13
Page ]of1
Daily Inspection Report
Date: 1-10-03
Client: Glenwood Tramway LLC
Project: Tramway Building
Contractor that Performed Work: Pioneer Steel Inc.
Testing of shop fabrication or field work at job site: Field
Report: Main level) Visually inspected some of the welds at the
C channels to the bar joists & on the guard railing at the
tramway loading area. Some of the welds at the C channels were
not yet completed.
IP The welds inspected above were acceptable per the applicable
codes & specifications.
Inspector/Technician: Douglas E Young i,
g
•
•
Mr. Charles Peterson
Glenwood Tramway Company
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Via e-mail:
Dear Chuck,
,., Garfield County
81.-ILDING & PL.1.\VL.VG DEP4R711E;\T
sch�ilrr.174xr ic.ld-couct}'.coin
March 20, 2003
In hopes of having a final inspection in the near future with a minimum of issues, the following items
need to be submitted. Please refer to our Letter/e-mail of February 6, 2003 for reference. Item one of that
letter request all 1 -hour wall assemblies be submitted. Ray and 1 have reviewed where the separations
are, but I do not have any assemblies on file. If you are using 3 5/8 steel studs with 5/8 X sheetrock on a IL
each side of the studs, the assembly could he a GA FILF, NO. 1200 from the Gypsum Association Fire
Resistance Design Manual. Please verify or submit the assembly used.
Item two is updated plans, which were received on 2.12.03. Item three is concrete testing requirements
outlined in a letter on November 25, 2002. This item is pending. Item four is no longer an issue as a 0. /4 -
different
different type of insulation was used.
Otems six and seven relating to an independent engineer review of the roof system and several structural
items are still pending. Please refer to our letter dated February 6, 2003 for more information on these O,A m't
items.
In review of the file, please submit information verifying the roof assembly is a Class B assembly. Also in
our tile are other departments or entities that need to do their own final inspections. Ray and I reviewed .
these parties. The results and approval of these other inspections must be submitted to us prior to our d.g
final inspection and C.O.
Please allow a week or more between when we do our final inspection and the time you hope to open the
building for business. There is always a punch list of items to he corrected. We will review Art
I lougland's Correction Report dated July 2, 2002 as a check list for our final plus the redlined items on
the approved drawings will be checked off during our walk through.
As things wind down with a project the number of details all having to come together spiral upward.
They all seem to come together in a train wreck at the final inspection. The more items that can be
checked off sooner rather than at the final will help with the process.
Let us know if you have any questions. It is exciting to be a small part of this project.
Yours truly,
Andrew Schwaller
Building Official
•
•
•
Andy Schwaller
From: Andy Schwaller
Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 9:38 AM
To: 'chuck@tramway. net'
Subject: Upper Terminal
Chuck,
Please forward new address and see attached.
Thanks,
Andy
•
s
Mr. Charles Peterson
Glenwood "Tramway Company
302 8th Street, Suite 325
Glenwood Springs, CO. 81601
Via e-mail: chuck(dltramway.net
Re: Tramway Upper Terminal
Dear Charles.
eGarfield County
BUILDING & PLANNING DEPARTMENT
February 6, 2003
In review of the project file, several items need to he submitted. I would not want any
inspections to he delayed pending submittal of information. The following is a list of required
submittals to date:
1. All 1 -hour assemblies for Ore protection. These should be UL listings, Gypsum Association U it
listings or taken from the UBC Code book.
2. Up -dated plans. Any changes to the original Approved Set of plans need to be reviewed for It
compliance and approved before the work takes place.
3. Response to November 25, 2002 letter regarding concrete testing. • 0. k.
4. Response to January 13, 2003 letter regarding fbam insulation. Fitotr' u40
5. Response to January 24, 2003 letter regarding roof drainage and field repair of roof brackets. a,
6. Engineer's letter relating to other structural field repairs reference in Doug Young's special e.h
inspection reports.
Thank you for your cooperation with the above. Please call if you have any questions.
Yours truly,
Andrew Schwaller
Building Official
108 8th Street, Suite 201, Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81 601
(970) 945-8212 (970) 285-7972 Fax: (970) 384-3470
•
Mr. Charles Peterson
Glenwood Tramway Company
302 8th Street, Suite 325
Glenwood Springs, CO. 81601
January 24, 2003
Via Fax 945.2977
Dear Charles,
Garfield County
BUILDING & PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Post -Ir Fax Note 7671
Co /Dept -
Phone
Fax et 9
4 -2)7)
Date
!-
From
Co.
Phone 1
Fax M
We enjoyed our field trip to the upper building yesterday. Too bad there is not much of a view.
I am amazed that you have gotten done as much as you have considering the time of year and
location of the project. We do have some concerns and request that an independent engineer not
as close to the project as you are addresses these concerns.
As per Sec. 1506 Roof Drainage, roofs designed for water accumulation must be approved by the
Building Official and in accordance with Sec 1611 and the 97 International Plumbing Code.
Please have an engineer verify that these code conditions are met. Our worries are that under
snow and ice conditions the drains may not perform their required function. It is possible that ice
dams might form at or near the drains causing excessive and unbalanced Ioading on the roof. In
addition there does not appear to he any other way for the water to drain from the roof if the
center drains fail. - A St.,,40711,
Several of the post angle brackets holding up the floor bar joist were field altered. Doug Young
inspected the welding but we are requesting that an independent engineer verify that the changes
are structurally correct. Finally, please have said engineer verify the altered post to concrete pier
connections are adequate. The base plate of the post missed the concrete pier requiring the
alteration.
Please call if you have any questions.
Yours trul
Andrew Schwaller
Building Official
108 8th Street, Suite 201, Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601
(970) 945-8212 (970) 285-7972 Fax: (970) 384-3470
• Fax
Pages: 4 (including this cover sheet)
Date: /-1.03
TO: c 4 -/E Sn14
FAX # 945.- 2977
--••-••••••••1614."r-1")7 "0 •.
Garfield County Building & Planning
Department
108 8th Street, Suite 201
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601
(970) 945-8212
Fax: (970) 384-3470
•
•
Mr. Charles Peterson
Glenwood Tramway Company
302 8th Street. Suite 325
Glenwood Springs, CO. 81601
January 13, 2003
Via Fax 945.2977
Dear Charles.
Garfield County
BUILDING & PLANNING DEPARTMENT
1 enjoyed talking to Ray Lyons regarding the upper building. His requests to finish the first two
floors and leave the top floor to tenant improvements maybe possible. What we have to work
from are the Approved Plans dated 8-01-02. These plans would have to be amended to reflect
any change in the project. From my discussion with Ray, it appears there are several options that
you are reviewing. At a minimum each individual floor would have to be completed. Any
future tenant improvements would he Iimited to interior nonstructural space separation.
Everything else would have to be completed. Final inspections for electrical, sprinkler and fire
alarm system, commercial kitchen and tramway would need to be completed. Your amended
plans subject to approval should reflect this.
Ray mentioned the use of spray -on foam for use as insulation in the exterior walls. Please note
that the plans would have to be amended and approved prior to its use. Using foam in an exterior
wall in a Type 11 noncombustible structure is strictly regulated. Enclosed arc the code - U� t.7.
S
rve
requirements for your review. Specifically, review Sec 2602.5.2.2. Your supplier would have to
provide detailed test results of the standards specified prior to approval of its use. Also please
review the other sections related to foam.
Ray also questioned the requirement to vent the crawlspace. Granted there is not any wood in d
the crawlspace, but excessive moisture and subsequent condensation of moisture on the electrical Ofredit haup,
panels or any insulation would be detrimental. The use of a fan tied into a humistat control Wett.a.1
would limit the required openings in the exterior wall in number and size. This may be an option
and could be designed by a mechanical engineer.
Considering the time of year, construction is going well. 1 look forward to seeing the first
gondola car go up the hill. Please call if you have any questions.
Yours tru
41111 Andrew Schwaller
Building Official
108 8th Street, Suite 201, Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601
(970) 945-8212 (970) 285-7972 Fax: (970) 384-3470
•
1997 UNIFORM BUILDING CODE
Chapter 26
PLASTIC
SECTION 2601 - SCOPE
Foam plastics, light -transmitting plastics and plastic veneers shall
comply with this chapter.
Sec Section 1404 for requirements for vinyl siding.
SECTION 2602 - FOAM PLASTIC INSULATION
2602.1 General. Thc provisions of this section shall govern th
requirements and uses of foam plastic insulation in buildings an
structures. For trim, see Section 601.5.5.
2602.2 Labeling and Identification. Packages and containers
of foam plastic insulation and foam plastic insulation components
delivered to the jobsite shall bear the label of an approved agency
showing the manufacturer's name, the product listing, product
identification and information to show that the end use will com-
ply with the code requirements.
26023 Surface -burning Characteristics. Foam plastic insula
tion used in building construction shall have a flame -spread rating
of not more than 75 and a smoke -developed rating of not more
than 450 when tested in accordance with UBC Standard 8-1 in the
maximum thickness intended for use.
EXCEPTION: Foam plastic insulation when tested in a minimum
thickness of 4 inches (102 mm) may be used in a greater thickness in
cold -storage buildings, ice plants, food-processing rooms and similar
arcas. For rooms within a building, the foam plastic insulation shall be
protected by a thermal barrier on both sides having an index of 15.
2602.4 Thermal Barrier. The interior of the building shall be
separated from the foam plastic insulation by an approved thermal
barrier having an index of 15 when tested in accordance with UBC
Standard 26-2. Thc thermal barrier shall be installed in such a
manner that it will remain in place for the time of its index classifi-
cation based on approved diversified tests.
EXCEPTION: The thermal barrier is not required:
1. For siding backer board, provided the foam plastic insulation is
not of more than 2,000 Btu per square foot (22.7 MJ/m2) as determined
by UBC Standard 26-1 and when it is separated from the interior of the
building by not Less than 2 inches (51 min) of mineral fiber insulation
or equivalent, or applied as rc-siding over existing wall construction.
2. For walk-in coolers and freezer units having an aggregate floor
area less than 400 square feet (37.2 m2).
3. In a masonry or concrete wall, floor or roof system when the
foam plastic insulation is covered by a minimum of 1 -inch (25 mm)
thickness of masonry or concrete. Loose -fill -type foam plastic insula-
tion shall be tested as board stock for flame spread and smoke develop-
ment as described above,
4, Within an attic or crawl space where entry is made only for ser-
vice of utilities, and when foam plastic insulation is covered with a ma-
terial such as 11/2 -inch -thick (38 mm) mineral fiber insulation,
t/4 -inch -thick (6.4 mm) plywood, hardboard or gypsum wallboard,
corrosion -resistant sheet metal having a base metal thickness not less
than 0.0160 inch (0 4 mm) at any point; or other approved material in-
stalled in such a manner that the foam plastic insulation is not exposed
5. In cooler and freezer walls when:
5 1 The foam plastic insulation has a flame -spread rating of 25
or less when tested in a minimum 4 -inch (102 min) thick-
ness;
5.2 Ilas flash and self -ignition temperatures of not less than
600°F and 8110°F (316°C and 427°C), respectively;
e
d
2601
2602.5.2.2
5.3 Is covered by not less than 0.032 -inch (0.8 mm) aluminum
or corrosion -resistant steel having a hasc metal thickness not
less than 0.0160 inch (0.4 mm) at any point; and
5,4 Is protected by an automatic sprinkler system. When the
cooler or freezer is within a building, both the cooler or
freezer and that part of the building in which it is located
shall he sprinklered.
6. Exterior garage doors in Group U, Division 1 Occupancies.
2602.5 Special Provisions.
2602.5.1 General. Foam plastic insulation may be used in the
applications set forth in this section.
2602.5.2 Noncombustible exterior walls.
2602.5.2.1 One-story buildings. Foam plastic insulation may
be used in exterior walls of one-story buildings where exterior
walls arc required to be of noncombustible construction subject to
the following:
1. The building is protected throughout with automatic sprin-
klers.
2. Foam plastic insulation, tested in the maximum thickness
and density intended for use, has a flame -spread rating of 25 or
less and a smoke -developed rating of 450 or less in accordance
with UBC Standard 8-1.
3. The foam plastic insulation has a maximum 4 -inch (102
mm) thickness.
4. The thermal barrier may be omitted when the foam plastic
insulation is covered by not less than 0.032 -inch -thick (0.8 mm)
aluminum or corrosion -resistant sheet steel, having a base metal
thickness of 0.0160 (0.4 mm) inch.
5. When the wall is required to have a fire -resistive rating, data
based on tests conducted in accordance with UBC Standard 7-1
are provided to substantiate that the required fire -resistive rating is
maintained.
2602.5.2.2 Buildings of any height. Except for foam plastic in-
sulation in masonry or concrete construction complying with Sec-
tion 2602.4, Exception 3, assemblies employing foam plastic
insulation in or on exterior walls of buildings where the exterior
walls are required to he of noncombustible construction shall
comply with the following:
1. When the wall is required to have a fire -resistive rating, data
based on tests conducted in accordance with UBC Standard 7-1
are provided to substantiate that the fire -resistive rating is main-
tained.
2. The foam plastic insulation is separated from the interior of
the building by a thermal barrier having an index of 15 unless spe-
cifically approved under Section 2602.6.
3. Combustible content of foam plastic insulation in any por-
on of the wall or panel does not exceed 6,000 Btu per square foot
68.2 MJ/m2) of wall area as determined by tests in accordance
ith UBC Standard 26-1.
4. Foam plastic insulation, exterior coatings and facings tested
separately shall each have a flame -spread rating of 25 or less and a
smoke -developed rating of 450 or less in accordance with UBC
Standard 8-1. The foam plastic shall be tested in the thickness in-
tended for use.
5. The wall assembly passes the conditions of acceptance of
UBC Standard 26-4 or 26-9.
ti
(
w
1-273
1
1
2602.5.2.2
2603.2
6. Foam plastic insulation is listed and the edge or face of each
piece is labeled with the following information:
6.1 Inspection agency name.
6.2 Product for which the insulation is listed.
6.3 Identification of the insulation manufacturer.
6.4 Flame -spread and smoke -development classifications.
2602.53 Roofing. Foam plastic insulation meeting the re-
quirements of Sections 2602.2, 2602.3 and 2602.4 may be used as
part of a roof -covering assembly, provided the assembly with the
1 foam plastic insulation is a Class A, B or C roofing assembly when
tested in accordance with UBC Standard 15-2. Foam plastic in-
sulation, which is a part of a Class A, B or C roof -covering assem-
bly, need not meet the requirements of Sections 2602.2, 2602.3
and 2602.4, provided the assembly with the foam plastic insula-
tion satisfactorily passes a test for insulated roof decks.
' Any roofing assembly or roof covering installed in accordance
with this code and the manufacturer's instructions may be applied
over foam plastic insulation when the foam is separated from the
' interior of the building by wood structural panel sheathing not less
than 1/2 inch (12.7 mm) in thickness bonded with exterior glue,
with edges supported by blocking, tongue -and -groove joints or
other approved type of edge support, or an equivalent material.
The thermal barrier requirement is waived.
For all roof applications, the smoke -developed rating shall not
be limited.
1 2602.5.4 Doors. Where pivoted or side -hinged swinging doors
are permitted without a fire -resistive rating, foam plastic insula-
tion having a flame -spread rating of 75 or less may be used as a
core material when the door facing is metal having a minimum
thickness of 0.032 -inch (0.8 mm) aluminum or steel having a base
metal thickness not less than 0.0160 inch (0.4 min) at any point.
The thermal barrier is not required for this condition.
2602.5.5 Garage doors. in other than Group U Occupancies
and where garage doors are permitted without a fire -resistive rat-
ing, foam plastic insulation may be used without thermal barrier in
such garage doors subject to the following:
1. The foam plastic insulation shall have a flame -spread index
of 75 or less and smoke -developed rating of 450 or less, and
2. The facing on the side of the garage door located inside a
building shall be minimum 0.010 -inch (0.3 mm) steel or minimum
1/g -inch (3.2 mm) wood or the garage door shall be tested in
accordance with, and shall meet the acceptance criteria of, UBC
Standard 26-8.
2602.6 Specific Approval. Foam plastic insulation or assem-
blies using foam plastic insulation may be used based on approved
tests such as, but not limited to, tunnel tests in accordance with
UBC Standard 8-1, fire tests related to actual end use such as UBC
Standard 26-3 and an ignition temperature test establishing a
minimum self -ignition temperature of 650°F (343°C). In lieu of
testing, the specific approval may be based on the end use, quan-
tity, location and similar considerations where such tests would
not be applicable or practical.
Foam plastic insulation in a thickness greater than 4 inches (102
mm) may be used if it has been tested for flame spread and smoke
development at a minimum thickness of 4 inches (102 mm) pro-
vided the end use has been specifically approved in accordance
with this section with the thickness and density intended for use.
1-274
1997 UNIFORM BUILDING CODE
SECTION 2603 — LIGHT -TRANSMITTING PLASTICS
2603.1 General.
2603.1.1. Scope. The provisions of this section shall govern the
quality and methods of application of plastics for use as
light -transmitting materials in buildings and structures. For foam
plastics, see Sections 601.5.5 and 2602. Light -transmitting plastic
materials that meet the other code requirements for walls and
roofs may be used in accordance with the other applicable chap-
ters of the code.
2603.1.2 Approval for use. The building official shall require
that sufficient technical data he submitted to substantiate the pro-
posed use of any light -transmitting material and, if it is determined
that the evidence submitted is satisfactory for the use intended, the
building official may approve its use subject to the requirements
of this section.
2603.13 Identification. Each unit or package of plastic shall be
identified with a mark or decal satisfactory to the building official,
which includes identification as to the material classification.
2603.1.4 Combination of glazing and exterior wail panels.
Combinations of plastic glazing and plastic exterior wall panels
shall be subject to the area, height, percentage and separation re-
quirements applicable to the class of plastics as prescribed for wall
panel installation.
2603.1.5 Combination of roof panels and skylights. Com-
binations of plastic roof panels and plastic skylights shall be sub-
ject to the area percentage and separation requirements applicable
to roof panel installation.
2603.1.6 Standards of quality. The standards listed below la-
beled a "UBC Standard" are also listed in Chapter 35, Part 11, an
arc part of this code.
1. UI3C Standard 15-2, Test Standard for Determining the Fire
Retardancy of Roof Assemblies
2. UBC Standard 26-5, Chamber Method of Test for Measuring
the Density of Smoke from the Burning or Decomposition of Plas-
tic Materials
3. UBC Standard 26-6, Ignition Properties of Plastics
4. UBC Standard 26-7, Method of Test for Determining Classi-
fication of Approved Light -transmitting Plastics
2603.2 Definitions. For the purpose of this section, certain
terms arc defined as follows:
EXTERIOR WALL PANELS are materials that are not classi-
fied as plastic glazing and are used as light -transmitting media in
exterior walls.
GLASS FIBER REINFORCED PLASTIC is plastic rein-
forced with glass fiber having not Icss than 20 percent of glass fi-
bers by weight.
GIAZING is material that has all edges set in a frame or sash
and Ls not held by mechanical fasteners that pass through the mate-
rial.
LIGHT -DIFFUSING SYSTEM is construction consisting in
whole or in part of lenses, panels, grids or baffles made with ap-
proved plastics positioned below independently mounted electri-
cal light sources. Lenses, panels, grids and baffles that are part of
an electrical fixture shall not be considered as a light -diffusing
system.
PIASTIC MATERIALS, APPROVED. Scc Chapter 2.
ROOF PANELS arc structural panels other than skylights tha
are fastened to structural members or structural panels or sheath-
ing and are used as light -transmitting media in the plant of the
roof.
1
1
1
1
2002.5.2.2
2603.2
6. Foam plastic insulation is listed and the edge or face of each
piece is labeled with the following information:
6.1 Inspection agency name.
6.2 Product for which the insulation is listed.
6.3 Identification of the insulation manufacturer.
6.4 Flame -spread and smoke -development classifications.
2602.53 Roofing. Foam plastic insulation meeting the re-
quirements of Sections 2602.2, 2602.3 and 2602.4 may be used as
part of a roof -covering assembly, provided the assembly with the
foam plastic insulation is a Class A, 13 or C roofing assembly when
tested in accordance with UBC Standard 15-2. Foam plastic in-
sulation, which is a part of a Class A, 13 or C roof -covering assem-
bly, need not meet the requirements of Sections 2602.2, 2602.3
and 2602.4, provided the assembly with the foam plastic insula-
tion satisfactorily passes a test for insulated roof decks.
Any roofing assembly or roof covering installed in accordance
with this code and the manufacturer's instructions may be applied
over foam plastic insulation when the foam is separated from the
interior of the building by wood structural panel sheathing not less
than 1/2 inch (12.7 mm) in thickness bonded with exterior glue,
with edges supported by blocking, tongue -and -groove joints or
other approved type of edge support, or an equivalent material.
The thermal barrier requirement is waived.
For all roof applications, the smoke -developed rating shall not
be limited.
•2602.5.4 Doors. Where pivoted or side -hinged swinging doors
arc permitted without a fire -resistive rating, foam plastic insula-
tion having a flame -spread rating of 75 or less may be used as a
core material when the door facing is metal having a minimum
thickness of 0.032 -inch (0.8 mm) aluminum or steel having a basc
metal thickness not less than 0.0160 inch (0.4 mm) at any point.
The thermal harrier is not required for this condition.
2602.5.5 Garage doors. In other than Group U Occupancies
and where garage doors are permitted without a fire -resistive rat-
ing, foam plastic insulation may be used without thermal barrier in
such garage doors subject to the following:
1. The foam plastic insulation shall have a flame -spread index
of 75 or less and smoke -developed rating of 450 or less, and
2. The facing on the side of the garage door located inside a
building shall be minimum 0.010 -inch (0.3 mm) steel or minimum
1/8 -inch (3.2 rnm) wood or the garage door shall be tested in
accordance with, and shall meet the acceptance criteria of, UBC
Standard 26-8.
2602.6 Specific Approval. Foam plastic insulation or assem-
blies using foam plastic insulation may be uscd based on approved
tests such as, but not limited to, tunnel tests in accordance with
UBC Standard 8-1, fire tests related to actual end use such as UBC
Standard 26-3 and an ignition temperature test establishing a
minimum self -ignition temperature of 650°F (343°C). In lieu of
testing, the specific approval may be based on the end use, quan-
tity, location and similar considerations where such tests would
not be applicable or practical.
Foam plastic insulation in a thickness greater than 4 inches (102
mm) may be used if it has been tested for flame spread and smoke
development at a minimum thickness of 4 inches (102 mm) pro-
vided the end use has been specifically approved in accordance
with this section with the thickness and density intended for use.
1-274
1997 UNIFORM BUILDING CODE
SECTION 2603 — LIGHT -TRANSMITTING PLASTICS
2603.1 General.
2603.1.1 Scope. The provisions of this section shall govern the
quality and methods of application of plastics for use as
light -transmitting materials in buildings and structures. For foam
plastics, see Sections 601.5.5 and 2602. Light -transmitting plastic
materials that meet the other code requirements for walls and
roofs may be used in accordance with the other applicable chap-
ters of the code.
2603.1.2 Approval for use. The building official shall require
that sufficient technical data be submitted to substantiate the pro-
posed use of any light -transmitting material and, if it is determined
that the evidence submitted is satisfactory for the use intended, the
building official may approve its use subject to the requirements
of this section.
2603.1.3 Identification. Each unit or package of plastic shall be
identified with a mark or decal satisfactory to the building official,
which includes identification as to the material classification.
2603.1.4 Combination of glazing and exterior wall panels.
Combinations of plastic glazing and plastic exterior wall panels
shall be subject to the area, height, percentage and separation re-
quirements applicable to the class of plastics as prescribed for wall
panel installation.
2603.1.5 Combination of roof panels and skylights. Com-
binations of plastic roof panels and plastic skylights shall be sub-
ject to the area percentage and separation requirements applicable
to roof panel installation.
2603.1.6 Standards of quality. The standards listed below la-
beled a "UBC Standard" are also listed in Chapter 35, Part I1, and
arc part of this code.
1. UBC Standard 15-2, Test Standard for Determining the Fire
Retardancy of Roof Assemblies
2. UBC Standard 26-5, Chamber Method of Test for Measuring
the Density of Smoke from the Burning or Decomposition of Plas-
tic Materials
3. UBC Standard 26-6, Ignition Properties of Plastics
4. UBC Standard 26-7, Method of Test for Determining Classi-
fication of Approved Light -transmitting Plastics
2603.2 Definitions. For the purpose of this section, certain
terms are defined as follows:
EXTERIOR WALL PANELS are materials that are not classi-
fied as plastic glazing and are used as Light -transmitting media in
exterior walls.
GLASS FIBER REINFORCED PLASTIC is plastic rein-
forced with glass fiber having not less than 20 percent of glass fi-
bers by weight.
GLAZING is material that has all edges set in a frame or sash
and is not held by mechanical fasteners that pass through the mate-
rial.
LIGHT -DIFFUSING SYSTEM is construction consisting in
whole or in part of lenses, panels, grids or baffles made with ap-
proved plastics positioned below independently mounted electri-
cal light sources. Lenses, panels, grids and baffles that arc part of
an electrical fixture shall not be considered as a light -diffusing
system.
PLASTIC MATERIALS, APPROVED. Sec Chapter 2.
ROOF PANELS are structural panels other than skylights that
are fastened to structural members or structural panels or sheath-
ing and are used as light -transmitting media in the plane of the
roof.
•
•
Garfield County
BUILDING & PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Mr. Douglas E. Young
West Slope Testing & Inspection
3177 Glendam Dr.
Grand Junction, CO 81505
November 27, 2002
Re: Glenwood Tramway Building
Dear Doug:
I enjoyed talking to you on Monday and feel that we can easily work together on this
project. Enclosed is a copy of a letter I sent to Chuck Peterson. Chuck has called me
regarding the letter and I believe we agreed that continuous inspection might not be
necessary. Possibly periodic inspections would be enough. Chuck agreed to let you set
the level of periodic inspections. For me, more inspections are better depending on how
well things fit together. All things considered, determine what you feel is enough
inspection wise. If you have any trouble justifying your inspections with Chuck let me
know. [f we sec something that needs more attention we will also let you know. If at
some point you need to shift to a continuous inspection mode we will back you up.
Call me sometime when you are doing an inspection. I would like to meet you at the job
site or here in town. PIease call with any comments at any time.
Yours ,
.ti)
Andrew Schwaller
Building Official
108 8th Street, Suite 201, Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601
(970) 945-8212 (970) 285-7972 Fax: (970) 384-3470
•
Mr. Charles Peterson
Glenwood Tramway Company
302 8th Street. Suite 325
Glenwood Springs, CO. 81601
November 25, 2002
Via Fax 945.2977
Dear Charles:
Garfleldcounzy
BUILDING & PLANNING DEPARTMENT
I spoke with Doug Young and checked the several references he provided. I also
reviewed his certifications. He does demonstrate the required competence to be a
special inspector for your project. We are requiring as per Sec 17 of the code that
Doug is involved during the actual processes of structural welding and high
strength bolting while the work is being done. In addition, any field repairs or
changes to fabricated assemblies involving structural welding will need to be
engineered by the engineer of record and inspected by Doug. Please see Sec 17
for other requirements of the special inspections.
Also, as per plans an independent testing laboratory must do the concrete testing.
1 am not as concerned with the footers as 1 am with the walls. Please verily the
concrete used in the walls complies with the plans. All future concrete will also
need to be tested.
Please call if you have any questions.
Andrew Schwaller
Building Official
108 8th Street, Suite 201, Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601
(970) 945-8212 (970) 285-7972 Fax: (970) 384-3470
•
November 22, 2002
Andrew Schwaller
Building Official
Garfield County 108 8th Sreet
Suite 201
Glenwood Springs, CO 91601
RE: Glenwood Tramway
Dear Andy:
AY(
ENGINEERING, LTD.
The concrete foundation for the Glenwood Tramway Visitor's Center has been completed. 1
personally inspected all formwork prior to all concrete pours to ensure that the foundation was
in full compliance with the plans and specifications submitted to Garfield County. I hereby
certify that the foundation was properly constructed and contain the specified reinforcement.
The structural steel is currently being erected by Pioneer Steel. The concrete floor at the
lower level was poured on November 2151. Prior to the pouring, the structural steel was
inspected by Douglas Young of West Slope Testing and Inspection. A copy of his
certifications is attached. He will be responsible for all structural inspections and will issue
the required certifications once the structural steel erection has been completed.
Thank you and please contact me if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
TRAMWAY ENGINEERING, LTD.
Charles Peterson, P. E.
Structural Engineer
CP/krz
i:Wucaconstrucnanlgarcn cert 112202 .doc
302 8th St., Suite 325 • P.O. Box 160 • Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 • (970) 945-2236 • FAX (970) 945-2977 • www.tramway.net
TWAVITANI
A��n � 0"-;33
•
(s)
•
•
,, ...-.
r -A 1
A
1 ,- k: 'EV"
;, . 6..... • ,-__ 7, ..r. . -
•.-- I. ‘..-1
tz)- = - r;
:DI •".Y.' • S LI- -
.'.5-
.....: .1..4
)‹.,.. •--g.:'.4 2.
„:..--,i,.-..,-....1 .:••cki-.• '-i
";.1''''',,,P".;2.-:'....:;'''•17'.•-:1:..'Ar'" ,11`.- 07"
•••-•--.1.r•---.'-j1:',.2... a... cn
' -0-...i.: gt • C
. — • 674 ....il
• '.. g.-.
• 1 - • ".•-•;—• g
..-3 0. . zpv.-•,,.. ' 3 >
11q1cD:• 3
=.1' 1-'4.'W. • led
'!'gi-ftmi E *It
1 -qt Irw' - 1:
1 •
e
) )
e t— t k '
• •
2
•
•
BESTCOPY
!PP o.
EVisk g3
gY 6v z- n b ` O
3 c; w
� —
a a
�g.
i
ƒ
• k
$
n /
\
▪ A
\ 4 k
n
\
% # #
n 24 %
$ 2 «
/
tal$fto 7141
\ k
§
Z.ƒ f
4
® ■
*4-.
§
� Z 2
▪ /
2
ƒ %
a r
% }
PLij
•
Mr. Charles Peterson
Glenwood Tramway Company
302 8th Street, Suite 325
Glenwood Springs, CO. 81601
November 22, 2002
Via Fax 945.2977
Dear Charles:
Garfield County
BUILDING & PLANNING DEPARTMENT
With reference to our letter of October 16, 2002, please provide us with the
inspection reports and concrete testing done for the structural concrete to date.
Also, we have not received a list of your proposed Special Inspectors for
structural welding and high strength bolting associated with the building. As per
Sec 17 of thc code, Special Inspectors need to be involved in the welding and
bolting processes while the work is being done. This letter serves as notice that
these items need to be addressed at once in order for the work to continue without
any interruptions by the building department.
I hope the good weather continues. We have watched with great interest at the
setting of the towers and the construction of the building. Please call if you have
any questions.
Andrew Schwaller
Building Official
108 8th Street, Suite 201, Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601
(970) 945-8212 (970) 285-7972 Fax: (970) 384-3470
•
•
Fax
Pages: 1i (including this cover sheet)
Date: /0./b• O2
TO: C4h4(i 141ou
FAX # c740. 2917
.. e(11. 1
Garfield County Building & Planning
Department
109 8th Street, Suite AO.I
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601
(970) 945-8212
• Fax: (970) 384-3470
•
C.1
GarfleldCounty
October 16, 2002
Mr. Chuck Peterson
Glenwood Tramway Company
302 8th Street, Suite 325
Glenwood Springs, CO. 81601
Via Fax 945.2977
Dear Chuck,
Please provide us with the following items:
BUILDING &PLANNING DEPARTMENT
B(iILDING PLANNING DEPARTMENT
1. Inspection update for the structural concrete to include dates inspections were
made, reports for the inspections, and the associate concrete testing done.
2. List of proposed Special Inspectors for structural A325 bolting and structural
welding as per Sec. 1701 97 UBC.
3. Ron Biggers needs an updated set of plans for his file.
It is important to involve the Special Inspectors early during the bolting and welding
procedures to verify the process is being done correctly. I do not anticipate they will be
needed on a continuous basis once the materials, qualifications of procedures and welders
are determined. Included is a qualified local firm involved with special inspections for
your review.
Also for your review is a description of Type 2-1 hr. construction. This might help to
clarify the requirements for this construction.
I hope the good weather holds fix your construction. Nice weather to be working
outdoors. Please call if you have any questions.
Andrew Schwaller
Building Official
108 8th Street, Suite 201, Glenwood Springs. Colorado 81 601
(970) 945-8212 (970) 285-7972 Fur: (970) 384-3470
1997 UNIFORM BUILDING CODE 802,5
604.5
When every part of the structural framework of the roof of a
Group A or E Occupancy or of an atrium is not Tess than 25 feet
(7620 mm) above any floor, balcony or gallery', tire protection of
all members of the roof construction, including those of the struc-
tural frame, may be omitted. Heavy -timber members in accord-
ance with Section 605.6 may be used for such unprotected
members in one-story buildings.
Roofs of unprotected noncombustible or heavy -timber con-
struction conforming to Scction 605.6.4 may he less than 25 feet
(7620 mm) above any floor, balcony or gallery of a Group A, Divi-
sion 2.1 Occupancy having an occupant Toad of 10,000 or more
when all of the following conditions are met:
1. The building is not more than one story in height, except for
multilevel areas located under the roof and used for locker rooms,
exiting, concession stands, mechanical rooms and others acces-
sory to the assembly room.
2. The area in which the roof clearance is less than 25 feet
(7620 mm) does not exceed 35 percent of the arca encompassed by
the exterior walls.
3. An approved supervised automatic sprinkler system shall be
installed throughout.
Where every part of the structural steel framework of the roof of
a Group A or E Occupancy is more than 18 feet (5486 mm) and
less than 2.5 feet (7620 nun) above any floor, balcony or gallery,
the roof construction shall be protected by a ceiling of not Tess than
one-hour fire -resistive construction.
Roof coverings shall be as specified in Chapter 15.
SECTION 603 - TYPE II BUILDINGS
603.1 Definition. The structural elements in Typc 11 -FR. build-
ings shall be of steel, iron, concrete or masonry.
The structural elements of Type 11 One-hour or Typc II -N build-
ings shall be of noncombustible materials.
Floor construction of Type 11 One-hour and Type II -N buildings
shall be of noncombustible material, provided, however, that a
wood surface or finish may be applied over such noncombustible
material.
Walls and permanent partitions of Type II-F.R. buildings shall
be of noncombustible fire -resistive construction, except that per-
manent nonbearing partitions of one-hour or two-hour fire -
resistive construction, which are not part of a shaft enclosure, may
have fire -retardant -treated wood (see Section 207) within the as-
sembly.
Type I1 One-hour buildings shall be of noncombustible con-
struction and one-hour fire resistive throughout, except that per-
manent nonbearing partitions may use fire -retardant -treated wood
(see Section 207) within the assembly, provided fire -resistive re-
quirements are maintained.
Walls and permanent partitions of Type 11-N buildings shall be
of noncombustible materials.
Materials of construction and fire -resistive requirements shall
be as specified in Section 601.
For requirements due to occupancy, see Chapter 3.
603.2 Structural Framework. Structural framework shall be as
specified in Chapter 22 for iron and steel, Chapter 19 for concrete
and Chapter 21 for masonry.
603.3 Exterior Walls and Openings.
6033.1 Exterior walls. Exterior walls and all structural mem-
bers shall comply with the requirements specified in Section 503
and Table 5-A and the fire -resistive provisions set forth in Table
6-A.
6033.2 Openings in walls. All openings in exterior walls shall
conform to the requirements of Section 503.2 and Table 5-A.
603.4 Stairway Construction. Stairways of Type II-F.R. build-
ings shall be constructed of reinforced concrete, iron or steel with
treads and risers of concrete, iron or steel. Brick, marble, tile or
other hard noncombustible materials may be used for the finish of
such treads and risers. Stairways of Type 1I, One-hour and Type
I1 -N buildings shall be of noncombustible construction.
EXCEPTION: On stain not required to be enclosed by Section
1005.3.3, the finish material of treads and risers may be of any material
permitted by the code,
Stairways shall comply with the requirements of Chapter 10.
603.5 Roofs. Roofs shall be of noncombustible construction, ex-
cept that in Type II-F.R. and Type II One-hour buildings, roofs
may be as specified in Section 602.5.
Roof coverings shall be as specified in Chapter 4.
SECTION 604 - TYPE III BUILDINGS
604.1 Definition. Structural elements in Type II] buildings may
he of any materials permitted by this code.
Type III One-hour buildings shall be of one-hour fire -resistive
construction throughout.
604.2 Structural Framework. Structural framework shall be of
steel or iron as specified in Chapter 22, concrete as specified in
Chapter 19, masonry as specified in Chapter 21, or wood as speci-
fied in Chapter 23 and this chapter.
604.3 Exterior Walls, Openings and Partitions.
6043.1 Exterior walls. Exterior walls shall be constructed of
noncombustible materials and shall comply with the fire -resistive
requirements set forth in Section 503 and Tables 5-A and 6-A.
604.3.2 Openings in walls. Openings in exterior walls shall
conform to the requirements of Section 503.2 and Table 5-A.
604.3.3 Partitions. Bearing partitions, when constructed of
wood, shall comply with Section 2308.
604.4 Stairway Construction.
604.4.1 General. Stairways shall comply with the requirements
of Chapter 10.
604.4.2 Interior. Interior stairways serving buildings not ex-
ceeding three stories in height may be constructed of any material
permitted by this code.
In buildings more than three stories in height, interior stairways
shall be constructed as required for Type I buildings.
604.43 Exterior. Exterior stairways shall be of noncombustible
material except that on buildings not exceeding two stories in
height, they may be of wood not less than 2 inches (51 mm) in
nominal thickness.
604.5 Roofs. Roof coverings shall be as specified in Chapter 15.
Except in retail sales and storage areas classified as Group M or
S, Division I Occupancies and in Group H Occupancies, roofs and
their members other than the structural frame may be of unpro-
tected noncombustible materials when every part of the roof fram-
1-663
1
1
huu�uii4
NSPECT1OH SERVICES
STRUCTURAL STEEL WELDING, HIGH STRENGTH
BOLTING AND REINFORCED CONCRETE
BECKY GREM(LLON
MO CERMET/
1 C.)1 (9701948-2508 Phone/Fax (870] 863-8452
•
•
C. Garfield County
BUILDING & PLANNING DEPARTMENT
BUILDING & PLANNING DEPARTMENT
October 1. 2002
Mr. Chuck Peterson
Glenwood Tramway Company
302 8th Street, Suite 325
Glenwood Springs, CO. 81601
Via fax 945.2977
Dear Chuck,
Additional costs were accrued relating to the review and subsequent change of the
building construction classification by Art I lougland. Please make out a check to
Garfield County Treasurer for the amount shown on his invoice. Also, please provide a
complete set ofdrawings fbr Ron Biggers. He misplaced the set he had during his site
visit to the project.
We look forward to this project being built. It will be an asset to the community. Call if
you have any questions.
Andrew Schwaller
Building Official
108 8th Street, Suite 201, Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81 601
(970) 945-8212 (970) 285-7972 Fax: (970) 384-3470
•
HOT/GLAND G ASSOCIATES fte.tivt.t.
ON WILDFME RAMIE MITIGATION, SEP tY 0
• ME PROTECTION AND =IRO & FIRE COM GARF/ 200?
Ecoc
—4..uhvG 4 p OuNry
INVOICE
CLIENT:
PROJECT:
SERVICE:
Date
Garfield County Building Department
As indicated below
Plan Review
Activity
9/ 10/2002
9/ 13/2002
9/ 18/2002
9/19/2002
9/25/2002
9/26/2002
Glenwood Tramway Company
Project No. GarCo06.2002
Met w/ Andy Schwaller 30 -min.
Phone conv. w/ Ron Biggers 10 -min
Call to ICBO for code interpretation
concerning building. Spoke, with
Mr. Carol Pruitt at Texas office
Conversation with Andy
Phone conversations with Chuck
Peterson and Andy regarding
change of construction type.
Plan analysis based on change of
construction fromType V 1 -hr to
Type 1 -hr. Copies to Andy
Schwaller and Chuck Peterson
•
Garin
2002
• Rate
$60.00
hour
40 -min
30 -min
30 -min
1:30
Amount
Due
$40.00
$30.00
$30.00
$30.00
$90.00
Total Time • Total
3:40 $220.00 -
DATE PREPARED
September 28,• 2002
f,k siff -ALS,
FOX [370)304-1221/FAX [70]304-1331 / 0025 ENT? AES ROAD, GLEAM SPRCS, COLORADO 01001 • / firesatekot.net
IL2,t0
•
•
Garfield County
BUILDING & PLANNING DEPARTMENT
September 13, 2002
Mr. Chuck Peterson
Glenwood Tramway Company
302 8th Street, Suite 325
Glenwood Springs, Co. 81601
Via Fax 945.2977
Dear Chuck,
Please provide us with an additional set of the Permit Issuance Only plans dated
6-11-02, and a set of Curtain Wall System plans dated 8-9-02. Art Hougland is
reviewing your curtain wall system with !CBO presently. We should hear back
from ICHO soon.
Please call ifyou have any questions.
Andrew Schwaller
Building Official
108 8th Street, Suite 201. Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601
(970) 945-8112 (970 285-7972 Fax: (970) 384-3470
L4111.11.0 >k WO 4111 4610frilli 1.. w >i rrI u
•
•
AND
HISTORIC FAIRY CAVES
September 16, 2002
Andrew Schwaller
Garfield County Building Department
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
PR114jr'TOV
illtriner TO NOTED
GARFIELD COiR'rrY
BUILDING DEP
,ate ENE .LD COPY
�,coraincroasWit 1404% Ott MK
ni
Dear Andy;
Glenwood Caverns, Inc. and Glenwood Tramway, LLC both agree that the upper
building will be designed and constructed as a type 11 one-hour tire rated construction.
This type of construction is allowed by code as a trade off for one-hour construction due
to the use of an approved fire sprinkler system. No combustible materials will be used for
construction of the structure of the building or the interior partition walls.
If you have any questions, feel free to call me at (970) 945-4228 ext. 13.
Regards,
Steve ' eckley
508 Ftlrit Strct[ • Glenw(x)tl Springs, CO 8Ifio1 • Ph nc (970) 9•i -•}(C;11.7 / (RUO) 530-1635 • Fax ;970) 9.5-`1(1:,1
v v «v glenwoodcavurns_cnnl i�
viz_
SUSPENDED CEILING
TYPICAL EXTERIOR WALL
FLOOR JOIST
PENETRATION SEAL
PER UL SUBASSEMBLY
REQUIREMENTS
6' METAL STUDS TYPICAL.
8' METAL STUDS ON ALL SOUTH WALL
PROPERLY TAPED AND
SEALED DUROCK
WALL BOARDS PER
DESIGN NO. U457
PROPERLY TAPED AND
SEALED Sr SHEETROCK
PER DESIGN NO. U457
WALL SYSTEM
ALL EXTERIOR WALLS HAVE MINIMUM THICKNESS OF THE
WIDTH OF THE COLUMNS OR WALL BEAMS
EXTERIOR AND INTERIOR SHEATHING WILL BE CONTINUOUS
ACROSS ALL FLOOR LEVELS,
OLEHWOOD T ° QNWAV LLC
UPG°)ER o MOLOOM
4VPOCL L WALL ormam
� RiAVAUeAV
li1 G=a®OC EEROMG, L4D.
302 STH 3T-, SUITS 325 P.O. BOR 160
GLENWOOD SPRLNCS. COLORADO 51602
(970) 945-2236 TAX 1145-2977
•
Glenwood Tramway Company
September 8, 2002
Andrew Schwaller
Planning and Building Dept.
Garfield County
108 8th Street
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
RECEIVED
SEP 0 9 2002
GARFIELD COUNTY
BUILDING & PLANNING
RECEIVED
SE to
RE: Glenwood Tramway GARFIELD COUNTY
BUILDING & PLANNING
Visitor's Center
Dear Andy:
Attached are two copies of the revised steel framing and foundation plan for the Glenwood
Caverns Tramway Visitors Center. The building is the same as approved by Garfield Country
on July 27th with the exception of the exterior frame. For a variety of reasons, it was not
possible to use the insulated concrete block system that was originally proposed.
The attached plan will substitute a load hearing steel frame system for the exterior walls. The
wall will he a 1 hour rated wall utilizing Underwriters Laboratories Design No. U457
assembly. Attached is a copy of the reference from the UL directory. The metal stud
thickness will be increased to 6" and 8" wide. The use of wider metal studs than the 3-5/8"
minimum size is approved by the UL "Fire Resistance Directory (BSRH)". The reference is
attached for your review.
The start of the building has been delayed by the changes in the exterior wall detail. Pioneer
Steel will he the steel erector, Vulcraft will supply the open web steel joists and Mountain
Steel will fabricate the columns and beams. The lead time on all steel components is creating
additional delays. For these reasons, 1 hope that you can review the submitted modification
and immediately issue an updated permit so that that the concrete contractor can begin to form
the foundation walls this week.
Thank you for your consideration and please give me a call if you have any issues related to
the change in the exterior wall system.
Sincerely,
GLENWOOD TRAMWAY COMPANY
Charles Pete son, P.E.
Manager
is \dm consirucrionlgarco curtain wall {90802 doc
302 8th Street, Suite 325 . P.U. Drawer 160 . Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 . (970) 945-2236 .
FAX (970) 945-2977
0
•ui sa
22- WA 3m m L3m�
�9�iamUZ.roo, mm -.0- " -.'g Cs m
40
vrMeC
mmS�<
g
A °m..m `�o�cD3,0„ smwama c 6c nv7"m„ mS
•
oo��aa-- C=026aTga7am.
mZmc o cn 0,-19? n�S�3am�Omeq4Qa°�ve4m�Sa�
c c a c.o 3 m o m3 m3 �aQvopaKmp i>>a co CLC' c mm3.nm..os.mapI, o m m0. 1vx
i�1�S w I U II 2fr3a*ab
�0~- 7p 5�0V3a mN~ �'»pmi°co 3mpmV8 znOcgm7 °w° 7,aa0np]co•ama,0.. r ^
3mm os o < < n a_.�`�c. °gym�3s9: TmSmm".m_ as a^ato
o0a�� m c c -3 Sna�.dmtioa°m°paama.gooSam
�ma+O m=m»w 00Tc2 amaoa atom - _m g7 mD
�-a�Cla .m m mSm3»..moa,=3°ma,Q-9. m3 Wn aia Q,~3m4pm U II G i»J� j2
mmO a ommW 0,aa�a ° ro.VWm7O m =3-°000." 4$91- �ZTva�" -go) 3o osmSg :��3" ommWVI ST�3mmm9�m4ado°^�0m3 a��RaIIoaao
I s�°y°�3a�7?.nomm�i30a°o0 3C W o�Fdnm°camV o3�D a.oums-�dm3°»0 mamom n2 ..06 map3o.
-°' �"I<aamTw3.mromamao�m.°00O»Zo mm�m
n\v �I,\3 43 I.m 3Q.42=Mwmf030M30im3aEt°ifi=na-63 Zm m
3a v_:at 3 `" m�O •51.4�gym D-.�Wm<mm 6I>v oomomWs-t "cc G3
m:� m?O°,F�maj ��C � ma
P.
C• m0oo 'm�$sp3 d 5-7.-,-� BPx< Cha!•m OO+‹�yQ.em'33rm-'m3fIo:pm m soa° .,. ,_
v 3 a m :Q i 3''m mmm
> CO + • +m=-vinD07.c meo�J almv3vm msm•2T msiau'� Dcm vfsa w O a J»2 m off; 9a omoagc„ �oQam°71ISmm°3oa3am3t
moo;v
�� IzT 0C 3 co
m 7S�w '2'303°
Nm 00m
0. WI
?
m3 n3
S4,S
T" �4�1�OI ' amoa;o3.0340.0340m..-,jnAo�o �e Jamo 6.wm0=3Jm -t3o-'Sao7°mV°'°.....mram �
��SanlNotmmaw p,Onpmq.n»�g*m�gm=m�nnOti »��?0�v-.l
3m :lig: 3m°vnv� arC
am m m�a
as a n mm N mW mI m ) am m.Wi 3 »•W OmymjAmo ,.T coo
to
m N •QI-mn~-m Tti"�..ca! OP CO i.j aQ3n'n*a �mm°a��a0 • 7 °. vmmSmmn'mga cm X ga yavg��ao3 �o,lm• smmmpm�a�mTo?Im0m? 7�p»,3 oO�M am� C0
36= .2,
e„�G� '3S°r om��3 mma�avS
°mc3O
av>^�msmp�
m oVm -0-2050,040...
000 o
»n -, a
o °� m,4402-{3;T��°mo33 a m u. - o 00Ka3 aQv"'3a�� co-conoa
3m.-km -�..•o
m ma�X0m 66
o. m7��4 3am��tta 1Fm3NaGG7�mCJma°Qoammill Sa^mK fD
I OmaO�cX207'a°�!Qmpmm-
000
3mdmm6 c�Mam3Soad<a °sd?°^dmm
a��`m�d gc
m3m O. 0. m em o3 m3• `13-, a;too s,aao ccamv°»a"ea2Q.
am A! 0� m°,?,ox °'0&galig0.
•
IE
o -i » va°°v o•* a -15m u m mmm am
m aem•cm 3'?,° m 3Saom° m =la ga mma 0 mce cnm
o' m°�-S eoac 3 3 m ae5-3 D 2 0, c mme ovm ,Zoom
no�Q* .mma'cmJ. TaQ*. g73o• ob car a6'°'"") = mm a®o r --010- o3aa
me: g mm Onipm Ohm m m fro a '-'� -we as ° n n�nm��C ate, oeC
c a vom a 00*[rXX� oommm 3 e
a -o a O n amv T w a s c"s m e a n D O a m ,aN�N�Nm eC n a ; ...g 5a 0, n m
bJ T --mo °7'a v P. o .0 a3 m Z o c,735.,••-.. 3Z o-.��pa;;
mmCac om..,In, 3 ca nmsc=imoxo� 3mv•gn RII11IIA mfe��o�V1...p »3 °
3 ao�a »7 3K m30c 3.2,....= mamvao -0 ag <�m Ctcc a-xa m f
Oa�i�sm oommT coo
ma �.m n..co »y.� m • oe 0'0. m�00 La'aN.mS'0g cro 8000
o m __ 0 -..,40-100 oc aao11774..4:02..9. n -0.d a SX3 m -4c m "7 m
m a 0 f8 -• m o:=0, p m O .O. n Oma° !D 7 3 0m
... m to nn.m �_ cc �c p mo 7 �� m r,�� 1 n 37~rap fr a.�
TQ 3 m 00_03 Ell m a co -i
f �a mm % o° in mea
co -7-
0.3 m n�fn3d3 mss c �. °3 jOf 3 Sad mmvvum IV >m°°c ca~ mm
�, -toe am aa3� a m a v -comae 2 m m ' oomm 0°a.°m 2y 3Naeo
mm 0
0°Qvom• J»5� 3 ma o. m D m ao°Q oo 11 n0oci�3 mT� mm3
mow o d o -co 00000 °°3•0p memo 07 -,° sag^00 03_a ado 3no
nO e+ t7m b� ate, m '010 6Z1*a fp 7 n�m m3 00 a�mom° a- m...n
2. 3 m• m 3 3 m m nb ~•� c 3 a m m h c m a° 3 01 m Toc.•^ n 3 0 0 M •o •m m< -.OD C
mom„ 7 mu°m a° ° Om 3 og •.maim $ m 3 m m 73 »mO Q O»p
a• s ° ^�'.a^''o a o'°" 3 o x •3 im ° ° b = as • O.0e •Jaaoaes N am w 3 3>=@ '-m
oma m 0»Om Q 0"6o 3 ? ,...-L. co
aceK�Oo C b' mO�j ammmtceo a� Cm• 0. as ``'
Qrn
om >>Smm0 nomS' 3�°. vm aut3aa anti mmmma� X 3=.go ii
� �tI
m. ma -a 0 3m •O a3 aQm m ��oaO aco ma p'a°�ov ° m3o mn.3m^ CA
3a*my~m Q,.�a 50 ..93 mg=a< 0 o o. 0mm5m d E ~� ^me Tm '_:am C
co.... aim m g moo a ar c5-13
eo 0 3° rlm H Fa s.. m u'm m r
m a x a m °0..3- v e 3 0* n o m mm f m 0 5-6-=', o =rm 0 a
.. O 0-,a•Tnma ac's Om II� 7S m mpO °»momQ 7m 00 OmO °aW Ql
p°t-'.•eo�a.•°a30 a3 ^m mm O g°m m m3 neoom ayf per° o m a^'3 to
-.,m a3 a. m< m J a m 0 3 m 3 m .�.-m Q` �. C V a *61" O a
J" a T^ 3co =0 co co aK a .1:)7a C° • 3 tr to 3 m a C ^mom a Q= m, t� m 3 tJ na q a m .�. ° u s o" m x
m a C �m - 3 aN 0 m n O 4.-a ? �. p �n m m < �m
< s 4 .r J° m m o m .3m00 O f c a m O an i am 3 0
00 S
m 3 QSv O = m -a o m a a m a 3
GT* 0 .°. f°e°40a 7m....R .a.3 0 m°�3m a m ° •nn j•X mm S.n . a0 I
' m° °s .m m•Zm a� a d 0 n.
m m .+ cm A 0 3 * 4 w w m co as : C O a fie 3 o n
m x30'".»m °ofrO op ° 03000 J 3x o0 0- m .c, g� o
C
n ^,rpOm p ]. m mmav' 0 m SA 77 nn -.m j° °
03 - 00337. =a.a. 3a0 m am73.. ? �m O.a-. Via! 7m° °gym [1°7
3
0 anm<°m mm •c co3 m °a a;o mm mF3 .9g Tia C
• m¢ a =03. .a.»7 a m 0 �m nm a a0 3 7 .m -a maa v m lb
as m� �m m m p
-.no
m 0 3 0 a 0Gm v m m 3 a v m 3 m v 4
-,. W,'a7a 9 °a�9P 9 m Tog?q' 9 3.a "Cq 9ma mm 9m'm
W
RRE RESISTANCE DIRECTORY {B)(RH)
•FIRE RESISTANCE DIRECTORY• (BXRH)
w
n -"
•v Oa naWn ..
00000 : C aq rn.+
000m4 mo �xc•Q 03 mc.o033. �00 cmi3m mW O mE 00�,�p x °°•*'3 wc13°n m•-
mama='a�a���mn 3.C3a3o �at4= aQafoom 0a 0mNfpm °0-cF. dm�1°p Ea*
momma my-... , m iV c 0 ?0"mm--.i'a7t pm3ti-O0 I OaSa»3AOmm-4 a*mrjlmo mto m T
a
0<060.3=0(1A3; c m a 0 0 0 7 a _-_-°30
0 *~ 0 •[ m C• >° m m< 3 m m=40.2•Z 0 m 0 a 3 3 2.,,— 7 O C% 32
y aa 0 0 m m m m v O m a_ r EZ m a C m 1 050 o m m0 °° n 0 C p w• » a 9 m
m 4 �j 3 �- =. co d 0 a O a m a .....'To a r cQi
C ..O%3a7 n< O 0 am0 m m V ' 04 M
`" •o um� mm�y-•mm<�...;;3m�maO, T Q m7,�t EC -0' � oa �vnoG �
3 mo �e fe mm Om m moi a: m v m
c m m ..c1 a-. Q o C7 0 0 0 0^ .3. 3• m . m 9 ti. n 3—. n 2-I » m 01 , co 094 ? o 0 m o. 0 0 r a-'� 0 o a 3 .-.
,am•.amo co > 0 x9..=3..om 3aa m v - n a f 3
m 3m m mm W v ,ate '5' 'o° co» moms moF,•n2.3,2 -6 m °Occm '-' $. ti mm fn
w0N2*0 R mjGO mQy O»0,-Nam0-_., 4n7m?oZ 3mc m3'0.0��'Cma@m xao7mO�jmm n
m•i„mm3' m amm 3cnr.�T,.ao o' o ., 3 3 mA< m. ��' a 2
�» v3 mmc �� 0�0_13n 3• m 7-•= 3a im Fa: ,Q eaa»a
3m 3 0. 03 Wm2 maDm0.-030,3oomin m y m3 „+Tc am :a•
=4 m000.r c
m ci,wm amp m.. O�"2�m •9m,m a,m 0»3 0 nod aamT cmn m mxln m»a� h
a�mm a, 5 a9, CT.D V1 m3m3m—n 'mum»•i o»�3m m m3m a7a�N;;oo4°u° m
• m a m�r 7350=1-70,=0-• -.-"c C m_ o , o . a —_ xm . 3 n o a m 7 moa 3
m nm c 0> 3 m °f•3 >— +.-w rC-•°, 0 m.� m 0 m a 0* o Apu Cio m a 3 a? ,..7a, cp m a a� m Q �� Cfo 3 k Wi3
°700 W ^-4•ma 2Zz c �Nm ,�mm 3•aG omOOm,m.. ami m co
m�•Hc m:r my�.� Z
o»xc,C oma, pmo m•0,0)0 m7030-30 00x.33 n Cs�mdmc No •v' 3 'aa- m
m,m3CL cC o°,o -nom non W..°m u°3�m33 �Cnmam mm3• Cov=amF'amm3m3nmmio`A0-” cfl
0��3gr D�yl �9r�n m -w0 ° mma•3m.3•m a=�mm.3. —Q £mO0c aeEm—T»�fm0p9e
m m G N 23 a map ti'fv m a a O °SO a �am m 3 .� n 3 7 I
0o as as 2 mmrm°�m oma > 3p 00*mm mamzn@ m i 3 ^of Q..
3330 W iI 0 r m" dti.,O0 °' a... 0 n 7m i
U6 -1-• (° , a 4 a°f m m n O m o 73 m l° 0 D
m��ugo oC 3
.-,OZ �a ,!...t-fdmm Wm m co�Tmm oaa 3Qmm 5.2. -car a��^tea ��%
x ti C m m a r 3 `7Jz 0A m z•,•. 3 a 0 3 7 aat a70 3 3 m 7 n,l: O n I0, -......0.....0.-7.-
027-0-0
p o 7- 0 0 n o C o m9 0
v »ov 33 mr.�mm 0> 00 0Mc acrd °'0 I0,— cc,-�a and 00M
0..0033 »mn mmc a o�.o� C
a n�cv p° a .n. CbWu C= 307 am a �v 3••Sb O CIOO°' a� —3 x0..., °° 3 c o -aain M o o o
a°ia5u _m..m DOC* m s�3 o�3cm 05-c00 —0 omm n�3m m 3omim.c.°'01p�1�"o3.a7 N
300= 22 o3aa mpp cm ivmasmca9, aaOr°°0 374 0Q3nmo mo_a^ 0moCa �ia0v�a W
M -Z a-'4 aud3' �0; as 0.0000'3 3 c�rnma0 omn amcmca l"3m 3 35-1=�n3 ap
u�m^a3` 0a a .� am 030a�• ..07 3$060,`� , �O ° nm'mOaQ
m ,gym'" ovo� y i om °°m�c�• "'no mm •m xgm aaia0 • ?0aa m$��»mm�v c
—� m 0 0 m u 3 3 n _. 3C004"4 0 a P m 0 W l
i.
—P.'3CM3 n��C o • VQ LT00^7,•;'3° m3 n mo..• inna�07'� 33°mCac �7
vimoss7 mn'nm COm m»a:m a, 30
cc aF.; ,.a+•,07a m?0,•. s3c�•o aM 3
m .. m m c m— .. coca's. 7 c m * C O a O O m p a 3 n O c O a m y
7 - —mer 3=�,3°»m e.� o�3c°3 am 313 =34 Slp°'s a3m`, mg o
°i °, _a o f m m m m^ n m o _0 ami o° 5*� m o 3 137' 1 •0 3 3
m n —a o• -40 N m n ..3 n 7 O m m m 0 m 0-0,0°0— o Na 03 0 7 as 0
ma0fvmm »9a� 00 mmc o00 zS' M»a°•a„ ? a me
^a mi3 x 0 a a�0aa
0^ p .3.� Z.r m m 3 S , 7 i 0 a,
o=� -
• coin mm as 30 00000 d y� a�o.mts »o a ::mkm �a a30-"_.02 .17 nam /.
0rr4?� m?:,� 3< :gym'-.ucc'°>Ca °m3Qo� `�3a 3 c -`�m� '_-.�
m m'r<mq°mar^ oils— fold ms �'ma0 000 3.*0=m ave 4
,» f m7i rm,n°° oma
•
•
10
00
T
T
2
CJ
T
0
0
2
m
2
2
3gpg uS S5E13!" t M5l1?.a56m
500-°23" O o a,m. 2 4 m o m 3 m
3 3 ami 0� 0• 3 cc m o ,n. 70 3 3 05%,30.2d
ma Sem0.5..:
3i-'a3 0mm,
>>zm�cm�ore m0, a-m3.3oam
a 05
a 3 r ..0:
3 m y m O m 0 O
_ m a
"'i0-�-7mm0 .0x05,�,3 Gvco _ a
my~4am ga°°n7 0c0,,, -..„,$0,..
730x''3'•0
,,,,,,..0.:7.1. _amovomamm m°m
::am�7 o� mar,m00 _c&oma
40. mm3 m °p3a7�'3`na37°
sa3g".3em 4m9smoama-a'�*3
0 nam..— Pg�m cm 0.a �3,m3m3'a
a=0m0ay.G CI!' 0" w•aAa.,.04,.
O y° 300 O Q C —0 o, 3 .0. G 3=3 m m o
3 C-.:21.,...53- 0 C� ~•3:p m ae 3..a 5
0 r0m „ mm omma3_ wee m
es g. CD m-I�n`��o3O7i°:
m
s m c_ M a
13".A!,13'.3:1:
m o? a� M m m. -I :° • mmm I; a
a9mp3 G-• �ti • 0.3°" Om 4g1^a
Ea7a37°d2:a m"�mama0s o0a
3ac,- 3m, °3 $ t°ma3 Ov as
°m.a3mD�«� P:pmE3.:asNv°x13„
0 max-cq=� 0 -.:O5 -o O ,0.. 3'.x••00
p— ^m am0M mm05an».m.0.Za
coo —,m_ m • u 7 a o 7 m a a_
0.....„m_0. .T.wiTi0c. coca—mom
QOa-.0— so 44303 a:�,..mv
M41:00 3 a u n ° m O m ° _.--A.0-
m 0° n 0 0
K » t *000 30'3
2.s3,moem ..oGbam ?amaa¢a
m m Q i 1� 3• N• m° Z. 7 a T G 3 .x• K
aim' -000000 -.omni• o• ...vim tom
000*00030. 31.3 .;7', Sm»O 37°
00 3c .• Cb <n 07ti,b•000 ti.
m700_2c3' 00 0 V0 ,'—gym, OS
�a00 TK.m. ' ? �m�O^0
FIRE RESISTANCE DIRECTORY (RXRH)
Q
FIRE RESISTANCE
Ftj .ri .•.r! CO 76 b. 8 �C O• y
•O -. 73 ^O 3 a wU w
Li.:. G t> c O i�O
um nl u< p3 22 Zo ^� � cid
2°m o ��
2 a a= 3:2 Sc � w e� 13'22
S
� z ; 2Yi �; SY S i ▪ = _c� E• ;o
o• d ;u • rn Fc w Y • 1E- is
n
c ; o
0'; Sfi= �? 2* 62 � � is ; ■ .
ao a
.7..-
7E rf�ao31j ! �a •4 In•
i■ 7,2 ■ .36c
E i• of i«m °S
c._ s 2. • u o E o el a
2« pie °C `a pc•� �m eo a Yy E�i� _
9 • un S_:� n•
n a cb•i i1i .1 U r7 Yv y
. ▪ n c olp $E iii �a a m Z •• c ac.i Ord
�G yoi c= E:q i W Z Y6 e.i E.
c , u3 6-- 3 Tf i w de +
�c c n U• ca ��g is i s K c 3
-,., Nom t3 a cY • I- i A 0 °E• 4s ■€
tgiyz I Yap E n o aoU uoat9s iE
��•12 SV 2°Y of ; q0 1 ;g g
42.1.- p coo cE 6^=8�+ i a � i` Tri ;ee +
Se EUIy Er o�c o c m
42122 Xt v 3 ■uI.to
eg:u12 Opp N4 Paa s s _ �:� .13,13.0:422 ;g
eE Z nma i2picg . . rig a E .LO:il�zi
; 222 ila
Ya ��x Po a v Y vg� � Inca 2 /
_ vge:� ss
va
.— El el r$ n you •r�,Y«I «E.2.0 a =zifiii. n3
.--az• ii. !iia • l a.vp.. usoin 5221,3-■.• •- U
2.2
2`u..„p a,16
E ~,M n'o a00 io cL0as t2f,10
i.~■+0.30. E ilituitT.va •cama-
c.! ra+Amap�
C 0 ... 5Q
Qe a+s c•S:■" P '_• as�� ^g.;
n dft n . ro m .: m mom
ca I
ID
a
� p
drr_
xm
ccoTs 3
c
•
d03
2
0
z
ri
•
LOOK FOR MARK ON PRODUCT
LOOK FOR MARK ON PRODUCT
7SCALE 1 1 t/z"=1'o"
1 rr-1 1-1 r 1-1 1-1 1-1 1 —1
5-9
rl r1 T-1 r1 (—Ir1 r1 r1 rl T— 1
14K3 JOIST
r1 r1 r
SUSPENDED CEILING
TYPICAL EXTERIOR WALL
FLOOR JOIST
PENETRATION SEAL
PER UL SUBASSEMBLY
REQUIREMENTS
6' METAL STUDS TYPICAL
8' METAL STUDS ON ALL SOUTH WALL
PROPERLY TAPED AND
SEALED DUROCK
WALL BOARDS PER
DESIGN NO 1457
PROPERLY TAPED AND
SEAI.ED 518' SHFETROCK
PER DESIGN NO. U457
WALL SYSTEM
ALL EXTERIOR WALLS HAVE MINIMUM THICKNESS OF THE
WIDTH OF THE COLUMNS OR WALL BES.
EXTERIOR AND INTERIOR SHEATHING WILL BE CONTINUOUS
ACROSS ALL FLOOR LEVELS,
ATE 09-09-02
ENGINEER CRP
CHECKED RC
JOB 846-01
GLEKW C ®C TRAMWAY LLC
li VPOCZ LL !1 aLL DESORN
11 302 arta ST . STATE ars P o BOX 180
GLIN1lOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81602
(070) 045-2236 FAX 045-2471
R[rteL1VI1 VV A LI
ENOMEERM, LTD.
g-29-02 10:33A
970 945-2977 P.01
ER -R n rl,�nnng7
FAX TRANSMISSION NOTEe � � IV � OQNEEEIM2
DATE:
NUMBER OF PAGES (INCLUDING THIS COVER SHEET) 4
TO: Andrew Schwaller
FAX NUMBER: (970)384-3470
FROM: Chuck Peterson
RE: Glenwood Tramway Visitor's Center
Dear Andy:
RECEIVED
AUG 29 TOOZ
GARFIELD COUNTY
BUILDING & PLANNING
Enclosed is the lull description for the listed wall assembly. The wall will he used as a non -
hearing curtain wall, 1 lopefully this assetnbly meets the required l hour rating.
Sincerely,
TRA &WAY ENGINEERING LTD.
Chuck Peterson
302 8'° St., Suite 325 • P.O Box 160 • Glenwood Springs, CO 81(102
(970) 945-2236 • FAX (970) 945-2977 • E-mail chuckatramway.net
Aug -29-02 10:34A
RXTJV.I.1457 - Fire Resistance Ratings - ANS11UL 263
•
970 945-2977 P.02
Online Certifications Directory
Page Bottom
C:uidc Information
•
4
0
a
4
O
P
4.
BXUV.U457
Fire Resistance Ratings - ANSI/UL 263
Questions?
Fire Resistance Ratings - ANSUUL 263
Design No. U4S7
December 15, 2000
Nonbearing Wall Rating —1 HR.
5
0
0
rati,MVP oM AIL
w
Page 1 of 3
Previous Page 1
aT
e• •
O'
e
4
s
1. Studs Channel shaped, 3-5/8 in. wide by I-1/4 in. deep with 5/16 in. folded back return flange
legs. Fabricated from No. 20 MS(i (0.0329 in., min. bare metal thickness) galvanized steel. Max
stud spacing 16 in. OC. Studs to be cut I in. less than assembly height.
1 Floor and Ceiling Runners (Not Shown) -- Channel shaped runners, 3-5/8 in. wide by 1-1/4 in.
deep, fabricated from No. 20 MSC} (0.0329 in.. min. bare metal thickness) gals steel. Attached to
floor and ceiling with fasteners, 24 in. OC, max.
3- Foamed Plastic; (Optional) nom 1/2 in. thick rigid polystyrene insulation installed between steel
studs (item 1) and Mineral and Fiber Board (item 4), attached to studs with 1 in. long, Type S -12
steel screws.
See Foamed Plastic (CCVW) category for names of manufacturers.
http:/fdatabasc.ul.com/cgi-hin/XYV/template/LISEXT/1 FRAME/showpage.htm l?namc–BXUV.U457&c... 8/29/2002
Aug -29-02 10:34A
BXU1V.E1457 - Fire Resistance Ratings - ANSI/UL 263
•
970 945-2977 P.03
Page 2 of 3
4. Cemcntitious Backer Units* Roard 1/2 or 5/8 in. thick, square edge, attached to studs with 1-1/4
in. long.
Type S-12, corrosion resistant, wafer -head steel screws, spaced 8 in. OC. Joints covered with glass
fiber mesh tape.
Board applied over Foamed Plastic (Item 3) requires 1-5/8 in. long screws, same designation and
spacing as described above.
UNITED STATES GYPSUM CO Durock Exterior Cement Roard or Durock Brand Cement
Board.
5. Batts and Blankets* Placed to 1111 interior of stud cavity, 3 in. min thickne.ss.
THERMAFIBER L L C Type SAFB.
6. Gypsum Board* Applied vertically 5/8 in. thick, attached to studs with 1 in. long, Tvpe S -12
screws, spaced 8 in. OC along the edges of the board and 12 in. OC in the field of the board.
CANADIAN GYPSUM COMPANY -- Types C, IP -X2. IPC -AR.
C -P GYPSUM CORP, SUB OF
4110
GEORGIA -PACIFIC CORP - Tvpe 5.
LAFARGE NORTH AMERICA INC — Types 1.GFC-C, LGFC-C/A.
PABCO GYPSUM, DIV OF
PACIFIC COAST BUiLDiNG PRODUCTS INC — Type C.
UNITED STATES GYPSUM CO - Tyles C, TP -X2, IPC -AR.
USG MEXICO 5 A UE C V -- Types C, IP -X2, IPC -AR,
7..loint Tape and Compound Vinyl, dry or premixed joint compound, applied in two coats toi
joints and screw heads; paper tape, 2 in. wide, embedded in first layer of compound over all joints.
As an alternate, nominal 3/32 in. thick gypsum veneer plaster may be applied to the entire surface of
Classified veneer baseboard. Joints reinforced.
8. Joints "Treated with glass liber tape and latex modified Portland cement mortar or ANSi A 136.1
type 1 organic adhesive.
http://datahase.ul.com/cgi-bin/XYV/template/I A S1:XT/ IFRAME/showpage.htmJ''name-BXUV.P457&c... 8/29/2002
Aug -29-02 10:34A
13XUV.U457 - Fire Resistance Ratings - ANSI/UL 263
•
970 945-2977 P.04
Page 3 of 3
9. Vapor Permeable Water Barrier Sheathing Material (Optional — Not Shown) --- As required.
10. Water Barrier (Optional — Not Shown) — Commcrciai asphalt saturated and/or coated felt.
*Rearing the UL Classification Mark
Page Top
UL Listed and Classified Products
Notice of Disclaimer Questions?
UL Reeognirgl Products Certified fur
Components Canada
Previous Pape 1
Ibis page and al] contents ere Copyright a) 2002 by Underwriters Laboratories Inc. G(
The appearance of a company's name or product in this database does not in itself assure that products, identified have been manufactured
under UL's Follow -Up Service. Only those products hearing the [1i. Mark should be considered to be Listed and covered under UL's i:ollow-
lJp Service. Always Zook fur the Mark on the product.
•
•
http://databasc.ul.comicgi-bin/XY V/tcmplate/LISEXT/1 FRAME/showpage.html?name=RX 11 V.1.14578tc... 8/29/2002
• Fax
•
Pages: 2 (including this cover sheet)
Date:
TO: CH -4C_14 ? -Ai Sia
FAX 94;-2977
---...�.. 01,..
Garfield County Building & Planning
Department
108 8th Street, Suite -363 .of
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601
1 (970) 945-8212
Fax: (970) 384-3470
•
August 29, 2002
Mr. Charles Peterson
Glenwood Tramway Company
302 8`h Street, Suite 325
Glenwood Springs, CO. 81601
Dear Charles:
Garfield County
BUILDING & PLANNING DEPARTMENT
The wall stem we are requiring for the exterior of your building is a 1 hour listed
system used as an exterior wall. The system you have submitted is listed as a
Sound -Rated Partition that is also 1 hour hut non -load bearing. USG's
Construction Selector does have a section on exterior walls. Your submittal
should be a listed item from this section of their manual. USG also sent you info
on the Thermafiber fire containment systems. None of these systems are for an
exterior wall application as shown on page 13 SA707.
In order to arrive at a suitable wall system we will need a submittal based on an
exterior wall. We will need a complete copy of the construction selector from
USG rather than miscellaneous pages from various parts of the guide. In addition,
you will need to amend your Fire Mitigation Plan with the fire district. A change
in this exterior wall may change the sprinkler requirements for the building.
Please call if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Andrew Schwaller
Building Official
108 8th Street. Suite 201, Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601
(970) 945-8212 (970) 285-7972 Fax: (970) 384-3470
•
Glenwood Tramway Company
August 26, 2002
Andrew Schwaller
Planning and Building Dept.
Garfield County
108 8111 Street
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
RE: Glenwood Tramway
Visitor's Center
Dear Andy:
DNINNYId g DNIQ IMil
UNflO3 013148Y9
elide Q ?. 9t1V
Q aD [U
Construction of the Tramway Visitor's Center is about to start. Due to delays in obtaining
financing, we are researching a more efficient method of constructing the exterior walls for the
building in order to speed up construction. We have elected to not use the proposed insulated
concrete forming (1CF) system but instead build the exterior walls using the conventional steel
curtain wall method.
• The exterior walls must meet a 1 hour fire rating to comply with the approved building permit.
We proposed to use the following wall assembly:
1. Stucco surface exterior surface treatment
2. 1/2" Durock Multi-purpose Cement Board
3. 3" Thermafiber SAFB Board
4. Steel Studs at 16" c/c.
a. Minimum size of the steel studs will he 6"
b. Maximum size of the steel studs will he 10"
i. The wider widths will be used on the load bearing walls to conceal the
width of the supporting wide flange beams
5. Fiberglass or rigid insulating boards to match wall thickness
6. 5/8" Sheetrock. (joints taped and treated)
7. Stucco or painted interior surface
The assembly has a UL Description number of U407. A copy of the United States Gypsum
Company construction selector is attached.
302 8th Street, Suite 325 • P.O. Drawer 160 • Glenwood Springs, CO 81602. (970) 945-2236 -
1:AX (970) 945-2977
•
August 26, 2002
Page 2 of 2
The change from a load bearing ICF will affect the foundation design. Once we have received
approval for the use of the exterior assembly, we will prepare and submit an updated
foundation and steel framing plan.
Thank you for your consideration and please give me a call if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
GLENWOOD TRAMWAY COMPANY
.7
• Charles Peterson, P.L.
•
Manager
i:\ t \constructi❑nlgarco curtain wall OR26O2.drx:
SA 100
•
00000IUMM
Buytine 0000
Introduction
USG Corporation companies offer a wide range al quality products and
Performance -engineered systems to meet specialized requirements for
modem bugling design. The manufacture of these products to carefuly
controlled standards ensures uniform quality. This Calsm ctlonr Selector
covers products and systems from two USG Corporation companies:
United States Gypsum Company manufactures gypsum products,
cement board panels, and related components for high-performance
systems. The Company has been a leader in the building industry since its
founding in 1902.
USG Interiors, Inc., manufactures commercial ceding products,
relocatable partitions. and mineral fiber insulation for building construction.
The Company offers the widest product range in the industry and has the
unique capability to market Integrated interior systems.
The USG Research and Technology Center, largest and most advanced
in the Industry, continually develops new products and high-performance
systems wtdch are designed to provide Improved function and utility white
reducing construction time and cost. Products and systems are marketed
only after thorough testing and field trial.
USG Corporation employs technical service and sales representatives to
help design professionals gain maximum performance from materials and
systems by advising on selection, proper detailing, and speaficabons. See
the back cover for contact Information.
2
Contents
The USG Architectural Reference Library has one binder devoted to U S.
Gypsum Company products and systems. and separate literature dedicated
to USG Interiors, Inc. Because of the different criteria used for selection from
nese two volumes, the USG Interiors binder uses a chtierent format, while
tie U.S. Gypsum Company binder contains the same folders familiar from
previous editions, numbered and organized according to CSI divisions,
This Construction Selectoris the key reference index to the USG
Architectural Reference Library. h summarizes fire -rated construction and
acoustical performance data for various systems to permit quick comparison
and selection. Cross-references are provided to the System Folders that
contain complete descriptions, installation details and specifications.
Product Folders provide technical data on components used in construction
systems.
The table below gives the sequence of folders comprising the USG
Architectural Reference Library. The numeral before each division title
indicates the CSI MASTERFORMAT Division classification. Copies of alt folders
listed are available through Company sales offices.
The System Folders and Product Folders are arranged In numerical
sequence. The first numeral in the tide number is the appropriate dnhslon
number (two digits for two -digit division numbers) so that folders can easily
be filed.
Folder No. & The Section No.
Dir. 7/Thermal Sr Moisture Protection
5A700 Exterior Substrate Systems
SA727 USG- Fire Stop Systems
Dir. 9/Finishes
SA920 Plaster Systems
SA923 DnywaUSteel Framed Systems
SA924 DrywaLWood Framed Systerrs
SA925 USG Area Separation Fre Waft/Party Wall Systems
SA926 1156 Cavity Shaft Wall Systems
SA927 Gypsum Panels & Acccessones
5A928 Soiraocx• Brand Vinyl -Faced Gypsum Parcels
SA929 ,abuse -Resistant Systems
SA932 DuR9pc• Brand Cement Board Systems
SA933 SnEr:raocu• Band Tures and Finish Products
Dir.111Equipment
SA1119 ST1auCTOccRE" Searcy Wall Systems
07240
07840
09210
09250
09250
09250
09250
09250
09720
09250
09305
09940
11190
•
•
•
•
How to Use This Selector
This folder is divided into nine sections—A to Lovering the categories
indicated below. Within the first six sections are fisted brief analyses as
documented by fire or sound tests, federal specifications, ASTM
designations, a other pertinent criteria. They usually are arranged
sequentially according to fire ratings—the criterion that most often governs
selection.
The analysis applimble to each system, as fisted In the sections A
through F, are repeated in the indhridual folder covering that system,
indicated by number in the `Folder Reference' column.
A ParUtiars—pages 610 16 include mechanically fastened and
laminated assemblies, demountable, steel- and wood -framed, load-
bearing and non -load -bearing --in gypsum base and veneer finishes,
gypsum drywall, cement board and conventional lath and plaster
B Ceilings ---pages 17 to 31—include suspended, furred, and direct -
attachment types, employing drywall, veneer finishes, conventional
plaster, and mineral fiber tile or panel surfaces with companion floor or
roof construction
C Structural fireproofing—pages 32 to 34—shows basic methods of
protecting columns and beams with gypsum base and veneer finishes,
mineral fireproofing, and gypsum drywall.
0 Exterior walls --pages 35 to 36 --Includes load-bearing wood and
steel stud systems and exterior curtain wall assemblies.
E Exterior wall furring --page 37—compares methods of furring
exterior wags, including veneer and conventional plaster and drywall
furring systems.
F Through -penetration and head -of -wall firestop systems—pages
38 to 43—provides firestop systems to block smoke and flames from
passing through floor and wall penetrations and the intersection of fire
rated wags and the floor or roof above.
G Metric Conversions—page 41—includes information on metric -sized
products -
H Product and system catalogs—page 42 ---protides a brief
description of each catalog in the Architectural Reference Library.
I Products/spectfication standards—pages 42 -43 --Federal
specification and ASTM designation qualifications of USG Corporation
products; 11L designations; code research reports; and HER listings.
Test Conditions and Certification
Fue and sound tested assemblies fisted in this Selector are based on
characteristics, properties and performance of materials and systems
obtained under controlled test motions as set forth in the appropriate
ASTM Standard In effect at the time of test. These listings are short
summaries to serve as a compilation and guide of construction assemblies
available In the selection process. For complete information on construction
details and components used in these systems, refer 10 the individual Folder
reference.
USG Corporation will provide certification for published fire, sound and
structural data covering systems designed and Constricted according to its
published specifications. Tests are conducted on Company products
assembled to meet performance requirements of established lest
procedures specified by various agencies. System performance following
any substitution of materials or compromise in assembly design cannot be
certified and may result In failure under critical conditions.
Sound tests are conducted under controlled laboratory conditions
according to ASTM procedures. Comparable field performance depends on
building design and careful attention to detailing and workmanship.
Certain sound tests, conducted In accordance with ASTM methods,
measured sound transmission 0111 frequencies. These data have been
retained in this selector to serve as a guide to the designer. Based on
experience, the STC values are very dose to those obtained for the
assembly under current methods at 16 frequencies.
Sound ratings shown for steel -framed partitions appy to systems
constricted with 25 ga. steel studs, unless otherwise noted. Heavier gauge
studs are more rigid and may not provide the same sound ratings.
Abbreviations
In the test analysis following. abbreviation of 'est' indicates estimated;
abbreviation N/A indicates not applicable or not available. Estimated fire
ratings are based on an engineering evaluation by qualified professionals.
Other abbreviations are shown below.
D aub sir A
a mariner rag
AP a enadi n
asor Cres thin
*sry May Sx kr Tes7p et Waren w
It Mmes kteM
ern els Alm lm
Delve Whalen max
Da emir met magi
tank& ors
Cab Ca: i npn
crtln mrra nmcOeo
CV Clog DC
m caro rep
Can MOW u
Care Waft mem
cora wrame oro
CCM caraoonl *id
mot
a cola meed ce
as ccelea Rain
m aatr
m
Dee Daly, rd
ea eiCil reel
we creme- nn
Marc enerdre SAfB
ee fresh a meneo leo
bicho fregoaria leer
fid txmme sera
It lea a
red heaecy sitar
n ka a res AGO
w roma TO
P OUP raen
GA Geas3Assaum rein
Dor *me LGG
m eramamr an
not rratmrier MO
te beer M.
nwerea eeneamn
Weal
reacentated
m Caller
mmoosee
ant
maw
panda
MN= ▪ a mrmeom
aerie
recoer en ea
WAN
ruble
roiled
Wand
lard CWremm •e olvego
WORM
seeareted
sled
new
mated a mensal
ss9em
maim
iterated
LGG LLrcatem
ieflcaer
nam
licit 00 34 ni
Details
In details, shaded backgrounds designate materials Ideated below:
Sand tleatlerWq malalal. columna team fireprmllna
_ RC- t ^' Resdem Mann* a eaa alarm •. Ferrbrp cremes
Apencles
Few
UL—Urreinigtte s Lahaaterles hc-
ostl--ono stare llr+rersRr
U of C—Wer sltr d Cation%
WI—Warnock Haley b',t sat onat
CEG--Cmsitig Erohreers Gawp
GA an Assoc (Rae Rance
Design Atruat GA -604)
Sound rating
STC sand ranscrssbn class per
ASTM test procedures
CAC Wing epertaxn class—
per ASDA Waoectres
Sand
RAL —RAertaa*Ameaeral_tiorab les
G & h--Getper & Flattens
CK—Cedar Ws Accust L8Gaa0Drres
ler+--edt Beranek aid NeArr en
KAL—rco0ares Accu.'stl al Laboratories
SA --snow & Assoc.
IC Impact nsuAaion class per
ASTM test pro:edras
FArC
rrusicirriaoNney
traretaisston class
Index to Products and Systems
Product or System Folder Reference
A
Accessories. structoral & biro .. . SA.920S4927
Acousliclal caring brash. gray SA.933
Acousacal Gallops .. SC2000
Accustocal steal . . ........ .... . . . S4927
Agiesses. cerarric le SA932
Adhestoes. clmdal .... .. . .. . SA927
thwurum toEl-backed pane SA920. SA927
Aiwa seawater. was S.4925
AMA Specs , pages 42-43SME
B
Back-MO*4;i s-ystemS924
Basecoat lacier SA.920
Brock vtr.eer arlain wags
Product or System
References listed are principal source of
information in this Architectural Technical
Literature series. Repetition a additional data
may occw in other folders.
Folder Reference Product or System Folder Reference
Federal So= Drop 38. SA1C0
tgarg erne SA920
Fiesta system. waTe & floors ..
5A727
Fre--eall systems ........ ......................... . . SA925
%atria ange constructen SA920. SA924
Flax =tette, anent board . , SA932
Fee -beck Gypsum Pareh, Ian S0320SA.927
Gaucprip posters SA920
Graft, ceramic tle ........... . ........ ....... , SA703, SA932
Deacon ceiling Weal SA927
Grown tuft ceen;rs SA_420
SA700. S4923 Gypsum Ii palm ......... ... S4920, SAg26
Gypsurn Panels SA927. SA928
Daum Alsace bases
Caged beam areinxbon SA920S4923
Cavtly shaft orals SA926
Celan heal ccoucrools SA920
CON teem *woo . S4.933
Cement board, extorter SA700
Cement hoard Manse . SA932
Ceramic le bas.e . ... SA703. SA927SA932
Chamois furrlag & Went] SA.920. SA927
Cruse walls .SA920. SA923. SA924. SA926
Cohen freprocerig 5A920. SA923
SAg27 j
11
ccosaclico Janis SA727
Feral eirtersido. cemeol board SA932
Minn; tirriry
ksulatng Gypsum Panels. iael
Ccocrole fasteners
Commie fokrity curoand SA920. SA927
Coro -ruction Ws SA727
Coned Ores SA920. SA927
Corner. =kg beads SA920. SA922
Cot* vas SA703, S4.923
Curled orals . SA.973
0
Dry -sat mortar SA932
D ceiros SA923. SA924
Drool filorootig SA923
Thydral faxing systems S4923
Dqvail parbarts, larnnated SA923, SA924. SA926
proal parlltms, steel framed . . . SA923,
SA925. SA926
Orient parlibaxs. mood-Itamed SA.924. 5A925
E
Ef S . . SA700
Extroiar coital orals SA203. SA923
Exlwior Iraudabon 6 Mai system ... SA700
Elbow wags and ceding'. .. SA700. SA923. SA.924
4
.SA920, SA923
SA920, SA927
Joint realmerrt SA227
L
Lathhp amessales, cies SA920
Lfl hydrated . . . . SA920
Metal bit6 axessoles SA920
Metal stLCI Darburls SA.920. SA923, SA925.
54926
Meal trim SA920. SA927
-Crla tasty BIM SA700
licuktrgs. Oval .
MTC sound rating . . .
P
Party wets SA920. SA923.
54924. 54925
Passer bases 54920
Rasta: celngs
5A920
Plaster lurrng systems
54920
Plasm pargairs, steel -framed
5A920
Nast. paVIter4, woad-frame:I SA.920
PListertiq Ube. SA920
PLiseers-baseCoat
54920
Rasa trim SA920. SA927. some
Pate -tau VcsrActico. ...
............ . ......... 54727
Prefirished pips= pane% 54.928
Prato SA927. SA933
R
Pad= heal cebrig carp:roofs 54.920
Radiate Wings S4920. SA924
%silent partakes SA920. 54924, 5A925
s
Screws 54920. SA927
Searty wait S4920. SA1119
%all oral outlaws ,SA926
Sheatlhp. gypsum SA927
Scrifth. drytai SA923
Sand word persons S4923
Sand =Ira floriceEngs 54924
SO= SA700, SA920SA923
T
Tae, reinforctip SA920, SAg27
Texture todsres
54933
Textured ceilings 50.933
Theri-trick oulerlx Orel SA7013
grough -penetrabons 54.727
The eccessories
5A932
Ne backer board 54932
Trim wassails S&920.54927
54927. SA928 U
SA923 UnderbwrharrL floor 6 courted top .. SA932
Veneer trashes. . . .
Vence' plaster syslerfts
Vert shag ccnstrucico
. ....... ... 54920
54920
SA926
W1)4 -faced Gypsum Parkas 54928
*he trim SA920. SA927. 54928
w
Waimoard & eccessarios 5A927
Waiclovering. Wry
54928
Wal furring syskens 54920. 54922. 54923
Wal panels. prefirdowl SA928
Wel sNeiJ, tamed board SA932
Wad -from palms, callings . SA920. S4924.
54.925
Index to UL Designs
This index lists all UL Designs thal iwciive the products of the United States
Gypsum Canpany and USG Interim, Inc LI Design numbers appear 4ithe
oorrespcnIng references, the UL Fire Resistan:e tay, a the Constuctiat
Selectasectim letter and number. Fa eiamole, UL Desip D21 5 is referenced
to B-67, that is, test no. 67 in Section B of the Coirtruction Seiector; LL Design
D216 is not in the Construction Selectorbut is described in the LI Direday.
16. Dos. No. NAL ULM& No. Pot 121. GOO NO. Bd. IL ON 88. Nat IL Dos. No. Pot IA Deo No.
A 0230 _8.77 1508 P505 UL Dr I1102 . .... 10. 0' ...U. Dr
40C3 10.06 0231 _________ . _____ ....... .....B .78 L510 851.6.52.Pscei.. 11 01 U404 A.4. 4.18. 4.37. 1511 110,
A202.. . UL Di 6234 .8.79 L511 B.53 P507 IA Dr A.8.5. A.87 D.7. D-23 U613. UR Dr
4210 UL Do' 6236 LL CC 1512 838 P505 ..........................10. 06 11405 ....4.13 U615 10. 06
4211..............................j CXx 8241 (1 06 1.513 .11 Dr P509 11 06 11406 ..A•67 L617 LPL DI
6243 ........10. 0., L514 ..............6-39 P510 , B.2 1.1407 4.5. 4.37, 4.86 1)618 I.A. Olr
C -FU
8244 (0.11' 1515 10. 0' P512. 11 06 1.14018.. .A.61 1619 .10. 06
C.4)-0032 .. 6248 . U. 08 L5'. 6 8.43 P513 10.06 L1410 UL Da 1620 UL Dr
C.4J-1020 .. 0249.......(1111 1516. A Dr P514 UL Dr L1411 4.20. A 22. 0.2 11622 1101!
F-29. F-30 6250 (1 0' L520 .UL Dr P515 619.6-20 11112 A-19. 4,46 U623 11 06
C.AJ-108: F-3. F-4 L521 .13.44 7516 14. Dir 1)415 A.50. 4.51,4.52. 1625 ILOr
F.31, F.45. F.46 0256 110.' L523 11 11, P517 11 01 4.53. 4.54. 4....+5. 1626 ..UL Off
C -4J-1347 7.5. F-6. 6258 ...._ ______ .....„ ______ UL Dr 1524 3.14 7518 .. _______ ....A 06 4.58. 4.59. 4-62. k91 1627 .6 01
F.32. F.47 6259 .8.3. B.10 1525 ..........................849 7519 .1.11. Dr 1)416 A-71 1.5.33 UL Dr
C-AJ.1348 .. F -7. F.33. F.48 0260 a CAr L526 11 01 7571 B-21 1(418 UL k 1634 14.01
C.44-2295 . F-79 6262 .8119 L527 . B.23 P522 B-57 IJ419 . ...4.1. 4-6. A.B. 1.535 ..UL Dr
C.4.1-2256 .....................F-80 6264 .13-9D 1529 . 8-47 P523 8-22 4-14. A-16. A-19. 4-20. 1637 10. 1>!
C -AJ -2301 5-81 132E5 _ _____ ....... ______ ........B.81 1529 B.48 7521 A-21. 4.22. 4.23. 4-24. 1639 11 01
C-4.1-2304 ...................5-62 0267 .. .8.91 1530 . B-50 P525 821 4.26.. 4.27. 4-28 4-29. 1540 UL Dr
C.44-31145 .........1-65 0501 Lk Orr 1531 ...................850 P526 B-22 4.10. 4.31. 0.2. 6.12. C1-17 1.642 UL De
0-40.3174 _____1--66 U420 ... . . A44. 4-46. 4-47 1643 10.06
C.44-3175 .F-67 6503 3.7 L534. UL Pr P528 . B.22 U421 1106 LI645 10. 01
C.AJ.5146 .7-6. F-49 6512 $.12 1535 LI. Dr 7529 B.21 1(422 LA CAz 11547 LA. Or
C-4.1-5147 5-97-50 1536 11 11! P530 ..... 11423.. ___________ . . __A-32. 4.33. 1605 4-45
C.AJ.5148 ... ________ ...... __F-10 6520 _ . .... ..... _____ UL Chr 1537 F676.. ____________ ...„„. _____ _LIL Ov 4.34. 4.40. 4-41. 0-3 U310 . A-73
CAJ.5149 ..F.11. F-34. F.51 6521 .. a Chr L538 .856 P711 11 06 D.10. 0-11. 0.24 191'.2 1106.
C.4.1.7062 ...................1-73 6523 .... 5.9 1.539 ......... ______ a a! P713 10. 06 11124 .... . 311 1014
C.V.7063 F-74 6525 1A Clir L541.. _______ „„ _L....B.5C 8.5) P714 11 06 U425 A.32. 4-33.4.39
0626 .8.10 1542 B.46 7717 1.1 01 4.40. 0.3.1310 0-11,0-24 V
D 6527 ........................LIOr 1543 10.0' nis Lk DI 11126 A.42 V402 LII. Dr
000 UL Mr 6528 .33 L544 LA 3.1 '722 ULM 11127 A-69.4.70 V403 10. 06
(1205 .1101 1545 11 Dr 0724 10. 08 11432.., ______________ ...... IL 04r V404 11 0'
DM ----------------------------.888 0530 11 06 1546 ................... P728 ______________ ........ .11 DX 11435 A-26. 4-27, 4.30 V405 13. 01
am............866 0531 __ Lk Orr 1548 LI. Dr P739 (3 01 1(136 .449.A49 V409. 10. 01
0216 13533 ...,_ _______ ....... ....Lk Dr 1549 . 8.18 P740.... __________ -......- -Lk Dor 1i419 V410 Lk Ds
0218-----------------------------8-61 6534 LL Dr 1550 .............................944 P503 11 08 U439 (0. 06 V411 . IA C4r
0219 .862 C.540 8.17 1551 _ 6.18 P807..........10.08 U.440 ...4.34 0413 10. 01
(1302 . 10. 01 6541 IA. Dr 1552 ............................6-18 F526 UL De 1(442 4790.14 0414 „LA. Dr
0403 0-29 6542 3-17 1553 818 P904.. 10. 06 L1443 A-82 V415 ut. Dr
(1501 . ....... _______ IL 01: PC09 ____________ ......„.,.....14. Dr
0502 ---------------(l0.t 6544 .B.17 IF P912 (306 1(115...............A.ee 114,1
P4501 0230-24 F915 10. 06 11446 _________ __ _____ ...........11 CA' W4.1091 ....._F-16. F.36. F.55
f -A 104-0 14502 0-23.0-24 1(448 .46.A6 W-4-2068 _F.91
7.4.1020 .F.12. F-35. F-52 HALO -0001 F-101 P605 -----------C•71.C•22 IA 11449 11 Co
F-4-2092 7-83 M-0-0002 _____. _______ __F-102 75429•1- - ----.. ______________ 6.31 11451 Jk.14. A.15. 4.16 W -I.
F-4-2063 7-84 (W00009 F.103 P U452 A-17 W4..1077 .1-177.16
F.4.2064 5.85 HVO-13.0.:58 .5-104 P002 . ---11 01 U 1.1453 A-24 F.33. F.57
7.45014 _ „J-13. F.53 14N.0-0159 7-105 P201 . B-103 U017. UL CA: 11454. 4-25 W.1.10% .. .F.19. F -4a F-50
(690 -0160 7-108 P202 .6-104 1.1323 _ a Dr vi.1.1093 _____5-20. F-41. 7-59
F -C (0-0161 ... .... 7.107 P293 . .8-117 1826 (.0. 11' 11456 a DU W{10144 _ ...F-21. F-42
7-:-1069 ... 7.14, F-36, F.54 P204 ---------11. 8! 11032 _ UL Dr 1)457 4.901>.5 W.1.1165 7.22 F-43.
7-C-1070 .............737 14064 P2D5 . UL Or U033 UL OH 1)458 .. A.89. 0-16 W.1.1067 .._...7.23. F.44. F-66
FC -2179 .F.85 169-5.0301 7.108.7.109 P207 8-92 1.12134 (1 0.1 1)459 ....A•51.A•91 W.1.2220 7.92
F. 7,2180 7.02 140/.8.0332 .F.1 I O. F •1 11 P210....IID f 11301 .499.08.MO , UL Dr *4,2=1 ...................7-91
F.C-2181 .F.88 169-5.1:035 .F-112.7-113 P211 10. 01 11302 . 0.9 13465 .4-1. D-17 Va.= ------------------94
7.6.2182 . F.89 F74-5-0036 P-114 7213 . B-85 1.1303 .4-113.0-19 1)466 UL Clr W.I..= . F.95
F -C-2183 F-93 P214 . .8-105 U304 Lk. 01-• 11467-----------4.54 44..2224 . . F.%
F-0-3054 ___ J P215 ---------------1( 06 13305 4.93. A-95. 0-22 1).468 1( 01 W.1.2223 . F-97
F.6.5042 ---7-15.759 P216 .. .. Lk 0* 12307 .495 1)469
1202 .8.83 P217 ---------1( 06 U308 4114.01 1.1472 11 (0' W.1.2227 F-78
F -F-8 .1501. _ A Di P224 1106 1.1314 .4-35.0-22 1)473 4-35. 4.83. 0-18 Vi.1-3023 F-€9
F.F-S-0028 . F.100 .1502 B-25. B.27 P725 ULDE U317 „ , .4.42 1.471 4-81.0-1 IV -L.3034 ........7.75
.503 ___ „ .11.25 7227 1101 11320.. „ IL Da 1.1475 _ ,. „.... . Lk DI W.13162 F.71
8 .504 B-27 P728 B-106 L1321 LL Dr 11476 . A-78 1Y•L•3161. F-72
0302 ...8.67 J317 11 01 P229 8-107 1.1322 IL OH IAT7 15. 08 1Y-1.5043 F.24,741
.G19 LL D: 7230 8.93 17323 UL Dr U478 11014
COOS ...8.69 1320 10. 08 P231 IR Or U324 IL Dt 1.1484 A.72 W.1-5114 . F-25, F-63
G011 18. 11' .1924 ---------18- 06 7235 B-' CS 11325 IL Dr 1(4135 A-38, 4.84 4.1-5115 ............(-27.7-64
6017 , UL Dr 3927 11 08 P237 6-86 L7326 -------(5. 01' 1.1466 . .4-75 W.1.5116 ..._.____. . F-33
6018 18. 0.' 3931-------------------.....1L06 7238 . 8-.88 1.1327 4-98 1I489 18. 01 W.1-7001 . F-75
6020 11(0' 1357 11 06 P239 8.84 11329 .4112.021 1(490 . .431.4-13 114.1.7032 . F-76
G022 18. 06 JG66 _ UL Dr P240 . LI Or 1.1333. 0.20 1(431 4-23 W-1-7057, ............7.77
G036 . 18.11' 1391,.,_ 7241 8437 11332 (1 11' 1.1492 _-_____ _______________ ...4.52
G037 .... 11 01 J1394 10.01. P242 6-95 1.1333 11493 1106 4
6043 8.70 7241 . 8-10 11334 .4100.4101 1(495 ------------------10.06 X432_ _____ ......C-4. C.10. C-18
6201 . 8101 I( 7245 . 8-11 17335 1.1. Dr 114516 . A-15 0405 .0-3
G202 6.71 036 .......14. 06 7246 . 8-'13 17336 A-63.454 11497 .10. 0' 0502 . LL Dr
6203 3.72 P251 --1110. 11338 (0. 0' 1504 .......11 111 4504 u,. Dr
6204 3.73 L P253 .U18! 1.1339 Lk Orr 11505 LIL Dr 0507 _ C-1. C-2
G205 . 8.63 LOC3 U. Dr P254...........817 11310 A.102 1506 ill Dr 051:18 U.. Dr
0206 UL Oir 1006 ,8.98 P255 8-114 11341 IL Dr 1507
- .. 1AS17214.C-6. C-7
6209 _______________.„.........LLC6.97257 B115 11342 „ _____„..A.103 512 .01 x15
6.8 C.9
0210 (1 0.1 1205 6-100 P259 --------131 0.1 11513 10. 0.! 9516 II Dr
G211 ----8-64 1206 11.0, 7260 UL Orr 11315 UL Dr L626 .111. 0.1 x518 C-14., C.15
0213 _____ ..... .,.. .. ...8-65 1209 1.1. 0.' P261 __ UL Dr 11345 UL Orr 1628 11(1i 7521 C-12. C.13
0214 _____ .. ....... UL Dr L21 0 U. DIr P262 . UL DA 11348 (.0. 11' 1529 . . . .4-56 9522 U. C4r
G215 1211 ______ _.. ____ . __ .... . 71-84 7267 9-115 11349 U. Clo 1501 IlOr *23 IA Cir
G217 UL Ox 1212 9.102 P269 8-95 U350 (1 0, 1502 1101 7324 0-16. C•17
0218 ----------------18-06 L501 . B-37 7269 8-97 12351 10.0.' 11603 „ Lt Dr 0526 11 01
6222 6-10 1502 UL Cir 7501 a Dr L1153 LL Chr L604 11 111 0627 ... ..UL Dr
=7 8-75 1501 1(C4r 9502 18. 01 12354 IA Dr 1505 10.011 0529-, 0-5.011
G228 8.76 1505 (188 7503 LL Dr 1.055 ..........1101 14506 10. 0' 9.530 10.06.
G229 10. 11' 1506 .......11 06 . LI. Dr U359 11 08 1608 14. 08 35.31 Ll. Dr
SA100/USG Ccoporatian 5
Partitions
Selector Guide to Sound -Rated Partitionsto
STC ape
60-69 55-53 50 54 0-49
Chula a
Yereel Pester
24.25 26l 29 33.
34.64 88.89
11.1416.17.19
20.2124.2526
31. 4. 47, 64 82
89. 102 toe. 195
108. 103
(1I Aasertets re Y/mrke at camel n ma male[ murk 1 to 115
.gapes 6 does) 15
1.8. 13 14.19. 21.
23.34.44. 47.52
55.02.64. 11. 79
96.95. 171. 105. 103
110. 115
1.3.6.7.9.10.12.
19.20. 32. 39. ea
53.54.64.66 6d
69. 79.80.95.95
100. 1C7. 110
Meta am lUsim This Recta Wes
1. Ira recta um Dema 9eran0 Bre Gymm vain DraY3 ere mum Brine Con Base camas sox reeled Wray* a tertIca5r 10 ordeals emu cempraris p metro rare time lees re
IA Derr 9419 ex ncee seas iii 5471. re W IA Cleopn 11423 far bad -Dori; metre Mori dere dewy tats re bed eine a USG resent a mem ranee elan Dae are el 511 skit tee Darras
D oerr r soar &sac t
2 The tem ire re hammed dear rho Qstnrsuard ter Wen 69axE a F1110X4. C Cas 1100x0 ere used. me 11at:M pa4 en craws* feed re slue mel roll me reaxerod (as eves t17waey wird}
3 et anus nda1rp ate me al 1/7 Ctleot Bre Cane" Berra It herrremdN m 2 a=te 5ff 101501 Bre Cream Bare etas Cerreaneel) 1e he rerq
4, to p1Sjae acre Bre teed 58- 944'1.70' rare Grsrr: Pence. lrEOpa Can. r 117 95P'rtam Wel Gear.. Pres. heloma C der. e e Drncsr9e n kberSie 5,6' FFera x Bram Aden
Reuse Pres + ar carerecard ere fie rat%
6. hoar 8m n Maya raisin ale mrd 9417700( Bre Elena 5leaere r Aslode Band Debt vast to smaUre adck56ors. C e wrestle 10lrtsflue 578' RUM Bad Sten are rel aA
cowmen re lire erre
B . were renew Weal= a ram r esbrmy /series. re 069& matte mired n &aim re fuel he ramp Glass flier mew, arra[ Deom61a0eC 1c1 were rod ratan
7. a 310.1 10 I'M- MO-OwW9 aeries. Red nine nue ro4le =Ord to mer a reseal
1. Fa s 57105 HaTetr9n maxim re asoenoias steam rare beer. cense re cure', IA I- re Rtsstros Omen
! 1n meArter Wawa. art re *.54 d dfe We stet reed ere 1017105
RC -1'r 691101 Creme a 50Jmel5r
•
Fume therm
Flre.arl ceeseadr Amdid gala® RON
Dar A Thiel data Daaedpdo A be m sic D4rn1i1r & ret en. neem.
Non -Combustible Wall Systems - Gypsum Drywall or Veneer Plaster
Steel Stud Partitions (Non -Load -Bearing) -1 -Hour Rating
mkt
47.- '
27.'
et5
f
3Sh'
rt - 8
l
5/5' 9€lw aril] *bin Prr6 AHEM Cee. a 191P9105 P and 40 1{B-1BtA01 5A769 1
ABmaMsstal 65014rn Bat 1f1C(0E Cee -3598' 25 pa red fans 49 Basel 01 r SA/7311 mei panels- 5A707
24' o.c.-ca Waw a! --pet M --Demers ralaap-ll. Dee Ui18 U4-1110717 S*9923
11466--atrc am bobs ws, weak Bre Gwen Base. IfEuu 51 Basel cr3160m0 C Coe pram re 3'
Cee. re wee farce site SAfB 25 wk. creased 10 19
adly- AL-fL-1F1111
se. 945m Bare Gyp®m Pres, Fee= Cee- 1 Srlr 25 pe 0106 36 Uslr111:1101 5+925
erg121- ac.wee rya Wets el iv d saw el 12' o.c -5413 M-
oerrefer cadged U of C 7.71455
seer Mem my Vol Ors* 1)7 11114 Ba16 *Sr Bre lama ... ........... .........3 saes 24 -
re 1'SAM ere h Sr1420
Cas
& 9eEa 1ree-2.177 25 pa reel apes -Cox save a/- pea sop 6 C1I-101.1
Wed -VG' aster Baan--oerrmw carred--sL/ scams n 1 B'
rstmme ed-CA*I-1218
3-12.20 pa and such 16 o G WSW Brae Gema Base. r emOF
T
17-0-117717 . n(i^nf% Cee. am rte --Q15 o Bram 701011 def0 ores see--Qgrr awe rd
4"4' iii 1q t i i i 1 i l i 9 r 1 i i 11 ±iii : l, tarot card sve*aaacie/ n 0802~3' 544 --ISG Ptirarecnir as
1 1 ii is r1 i i9 :- c iI. it is i merge %ail re laced pr -pew teaks, NT IAG sere type bre
aomDDae re pass ape --Darold Bre weer =exited'. Wise. Bard
rt 7 friar --OL Dee U404
T
Silt 1r it Sr 11 13 if:(iflfl7
i9rif'f;;ri
L 4 i 1(P m1 1.:..ii l
3." �4 ai.i'r'"•Hy
41
et 5
503' two a 5ir 819511 Brae PK= Base -347 20 pa stAb-
3 D risvis SA143--4x491 scow enscred S o c ark 1 -yr Rano seers
SSG Planer Bale o9e aoeue6low trem-lar3 UMW erM ISG
3ebretge lore 087 110 re nxr iaoo--lEG Pete Bongs peer
cease dose are Mod pare-0r"1ad Bre renes emcee see tiler
a c7rretlerel err ee-LL Drs 1897
1)' 96110a BPM G)Sern Pref Frame C Cas -2• VI sum
24- 0 e -woe are peso ea Sue savers -1 1 7 SA,13-
'y PFI - i 1 . Il errs f6 --arose afee-11. We L111 r 1M44 --rate em mew
rte V A% Bre Gram Bass 11.501E C Cee. eV maser Brew Wax
3� p� u-iiipmrU73NI i� 7
el 6
3010 6EE1eu0. Bre Glow Pelee. F1Em0E Coe` 2.177 25 W 0157
etch 24' o c -1 l2' Skre-ganeh appy ha, & 3 95.9-Mr4 Pas
hn-C141-19-43--5699 also Kress le waxer .031 YI 9arrocx
Bre Gipson P. Wath C Cat. web ant pis 54- 6-1.14
-RSV also eaoaoe rte WW1. lata Gypsum Bee. recces Coe are
wee t.16'1 Street
5A92D 5
BMW at 3fiB' song S 7 SA48-116401122
T V2 6!£19310 Brae pyeeen Peeet, Poeta! C Cas -2.17 25 Ise see 50 SA. I4 5A923 e
4 • -�.�1 ,(Y1;- S5W 24' o c --see Sar ones CM ode Rale 43-1-1 r2' $Af� 41 Basel m same co'54 va'rime
e 1+ 4 u +Y II ti; I �n,: r' u iT O Oa01e layers ox Dares slate. worts 54 -Des n90 asks9- SAFi-ML-n-111148
18. mea 13019 r U444 -ere em 3ppies ern brew e rid Swam Brae.
rracccr C Cue. rto gem ram wen
w1 7
6
C40
Systems
High-Perfomtance Fire
Protection Systema
THERMAFIBER Life -Safety
Fire Containment Systems
072OWWUSG
Only through the use of THErwM, . EEH SAFB and SHEt TROC.K brand Gypsum Panels, ULTRACODE Core. can the highest,
most efficient fire ratings be obtained. In the past, it a design specified a 2 -hr. fire rating, a double layer drywall
system was required. Now, with the new 3/4" SHEET OCx brand Gypsum Panels, L .TRACDDE Core, and 3"
THFr AFBER SAFB in the stud cavities, a 2 -hr fire ral:ng 15 provided with a s;ngle-layer system. This system also
provides an STC of 50
Wth double layers of 314" SHEETROCK brand Gypsum Panels, fJLTRACOCE Core, and 2" TF E MAFIEER SAFB in the
stud cavities. a 4 -hr. fire rating can be obtained. The double layer system provides an STC of 56.
A third system is a USG Snaft Wall partition, which provides a 2 -hr, fire rating and STC 52.
Steel Stud Partition—TxERAIAHBE1t 3 SAFE in
a catty of 3-1/T or 3-5/8' steel studs with
1 layer 3/4" SHEETRocx brand Gypsum Panels,
UuaACOOE Core, on each side. Sound test
USG -91081T. 50 STC UL Design U491';
2 -hour rating.
Steel Stud Partition—THEReu►TBER 2- SAFE in a
cavity of 2-1/2' steel studs with 2 layers 3/4'
SHOTROCK brand Gypsum Panels, ULTRACOBE Core,
on each side. Sound test SA -91090r: 58 STC
UL Design U49r; 4 -hour rating.
Cavity Shaft Wall—THERMAAF®Ex 3 SAF8 In a
cavity of 4` USG Steel C -H Studs 24' o.c. with
1 layer of 3/4- SREETROCK brand Gypsum Panels,
thrRACooE Core, on one side and 1 layer 1-
SHeErRocx brand Gypsum Liner Panets on
other side. Sound test USG -910813^. 52 STC.
UL Design U492•: 2 -hour rating.
Wdt Wntt2..k GyasLrn d'SC d Sara Iorrulazen, ani veneer r sten, fie pertar ;e Ls 7Le same and suuld penton wca 4
aDDrar.1a'et/ [IV same as Mew S1EE7Rxx grand GraeLm Pare s
Uaited States Gypsum Company SAT07
13
Systems
•
THERMAFIBER FS -15 and
Commercial FS -25 fllenkets
Blankets
•
Product Data
and Insulating
Value
Information
v
Stas & Shrppirg Points
Birmingham, AL
Wabash, IN
TluRMAFI9ER FS -15 Commercial Blankets are ideal for commercial wood- and steel -stud assemblies and exterior I
Z -furring- They are avaiiabie ir densities of 4 -Ib cu. ft. (1" thickness} or 2.5-1b. cu. ft. (1-1/2" thickness and
'kicker), thicknesses of 1" to 6", widths of 16" and 24" and 48" long When installed in exterior walls, they reduce
heat transmission, saving energy and improving occupant comfort. Flame spread rating is 15, smoke developed 0
TFFr}iMAFTBEA FS -25 Commercial Blankets are intended for most exposed -insulation and vapor-con:rot situa-
tions, such as floor/ceilings, walls or crawl spaces. They provide thermal and sound control properties and are also
foil -faced with an FSP vapor retarder. They are available in 3 -Ib /cu. ft. density in thicknesses of 3" to 6", widths of
16" and 24" and 48" long Flame spread rating is 25, smoke developed 0.
Product Designation I Minimum Thickness
CW 40u'0
ICw 70o:
Icw co, I1"
Trtirttar_n=.. CW
'c:FSPRN 43 13"
r.qs :L4 90 2" 1 4"a
Sahf`gr-] 14- 4-
SuotF SFA Compound 130 oz. cartxdge. 5 gal ;,ai's
I�C d -en Duct Fireproof,ng 2.1/2" 2-1R"
SAF8 I1" IT
IF5.15 1" 6"
L-25 13" 6"
2"
1.1("
I Standard Sixes
I Length,*
24" 36" 48" 60-
24"1
0-
24"36" 48" 61Y
24" 136" 46" 60"
24" 1 36" 48" 60"
24- 36- 48' 60'
24" 48"
f6'
Maximum thickness WidMa
I^�
Uatte! States Gypsum Compri SATOT 14
24" 48"
16", 24" 48"
16" 24" 48"
16".24' I48'
J
•
B1 Staff :.ounge 29 1 `:.8 No Hallway N/R
B1 Caving Managers 3 : J.6 No Hallway N/R 11
B1 Wild Tour ilq. 2 1 0.4 No hallway N/R 11
B1 Rest. Storage Rm AC 0.0 No Hallway N/R
B1 Retail Storage AC 0.0 No Hallway N/R
B1 Mechanical Room AC: 0.0 No Hallway N/R
B1 Men's HC Rest Room AC2 - 0.4 No :'.allway N/R
B1 Gu -des Men's Shower AC2 1 0.4 No Hallway N/R
B1 Womens HC Rest Room AC2 1 0.4 No Hallway N/R
131 Guides womens ShowerAC2 1 0.4 No Hallway N/R
1: Non -habitable Area AC 0.0 No N/A N/R
TOTAL 34 2 29.1 No N/A N/R
NOTE: Areas with 'AC' before the number of occupants area is being
treated as an accessory for occupant loads.
-- Sec. 1003.2.2.2.1,-:xcep`_ion
Railways shall be considered as intervening rooms for exit -access design
purposes. -- Sec. 1004.3.3.1
Walls and ceilings of hallways are not required to be fire -resistive
unless they are required to be fire -resistive based construction type.
- - Sec. .004.3.3.3
There is no restriction as to the amount and type of openings unless
protection of openings is required by some other code provision.
- - Sec. 1004.3.3.4
Elevator lobbies are not required. -- Sec. 1004.3.3.b
In areas where 2 exits are required, the minimum separation is 1/2 of
the maximum diagonal of the area or floor. Sec. 1004.2.4
'Ther. 2 exits arc required, exits must be arranged so that it is possible
to go in either direction from any point in a corridor or hallway to a
separate exit, except for dead ends not exceeding 20 feet in length.
-- Sec. 1004.2.6
Exit signs are required from all areas where 2 or exits are required.
- - Sec. 1003.2.8.2, Exception 2
No point to be more than 100 feet from an exit sign.
Main exterior exit doors which obviously and clearly are identifiable
as exits need not be signed when approved. -- Sec. .003.2.8.2, Exception
Door swing is based on Sec. 1003.3.1.5 except as noted.
Occupant .load factor is based on Table 10-A.
Number of exits is based on Table 10-A except as noted.
Exit width is in inches and based on Sec. 1003.2.3 and Table :0-B
Exit width is to be divded approximately equally among exits.
- - Sec. 1003.2.3.2
Width shown for all areas is based on other egress components.
Width shown for ist floor is based on other egress components.
Width shown for ether floors & basements is based on stairways.
- - Table 10-B
NOTE: When the occupant load on an upper floor is greater than the
floor(s) below, minimum exiting requirements are maintained.
Sec. 1CJ3.2.3.3
For the minimum width of doors, see Sec. 1003.3.1.3
For the minimum width of hallways, sec Sec. 1004.3.3.2
F'cr the minimum width of corridors, see Sec. 1004.3.4.2
For the minimum wdt.h of stairways, see Sec. 1003.3.3.2
5
FOOTNOTES:
Panic hardware is based or. Sec. 1007.2.5
See exception for main exit in A-3 occupancies and churches.
Corridors within an office space with an occupant load of 100 or less
are not required Lo be rated. -- Sec. 1004.3.4.3, Exception 5
The requirement for this hallway/corridor to be a corridor is based
on this area requiring more than one exit. -- Sec. 1004.2.2,Exception 2
NOTE: One exit may be through an adjoining or intervening room, which
in tura provides direct access to an exit or to a corridor.
-- Sec. 1004.2.2, Exception 4.
E:.USN. AND SURFACE BOLTS:
Manually operated edge- or surface -:taunted fic.sh bolts and surface
bolts or any other type of device that may be used to close or
restrain the door other than by operation of the locking device
shall not be used. When automatic flush bolts are used, the door
leaf having the automatic flush bolt shat) not have a door knob or
surface -mounted hardware. The unlatching of any leaf shall not
require more than one operation. -- Sec. 1003.3.1.8
LOCKS AND LATCHES:
Regardless of the occupant load served, exit doors shall be openab1e
from the inside without the use of a key or any special knowledge or
effort. -- Sec. 1003.3.1.8
Key -locking hardware may be used on the :Hain exit when the main exit
consists of a single door or pair of doors if there is a sign stating
THIS DOOR MUST REMAIN UNLOCKED DURING BUSINESS HOURS. When unlocked,
door(s) must swing without operation of any latching device. -- exc.
STA:R NOTES:
Public stairways:
1) The rise of steps shall not be less than 4 inches or greater than 7
inches. The minimum run is 11 inches. The maximum variation is 3/8
inch in a flight of stairs. -- Sec. :003.3.3.3
2) The minimum width of a stairway is 36 inches, 44inches if the
occupant load is greater than 49. -- Sec. 1003.3.3.2
Also see exit table above Lo see if minimum width is greater. than
44 inches
3) Provide a handrail on both sides of stairway 34 to 38 inches above the
nosing. May be on one side of stairways less than 44 inches wide.
- - Sec. 1003.3.3.6, Exception 1
41 Provide a guard rail where drop off is greater than. 30 inches.
-- Sec. 309.1
5) The minimum height is 42 inches. -- Sec. 509.2
6) Open guardrails shall have intermediate rails or ornamental pattern
such that a sphere 4 inches in diameter cannot pass through.
- - Sec. 509.3 Inc triangular opening formed at the riser, tread and
guardrail may be 6 inches. -- 509.3, Exception 2
7) The minimum headroom is 6 ft.- 8 inches. Such clearance shall he
measured vertically from a plane parallel and tangent to the s:.airway
tread nosing to the so`fi_ above at a1) points. -- Sec. 1003.3.3.4
6