HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication- Permit1
GARFIELD COUNTY
BUILDING, SANITATION
and PLANNING DEPARTMENT
109 8th. Street, Suite 303
Glenwood Spring}, CO 81601(970) 945-8212
No.8440
Clerk
111
GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION
GARFIELD COUNTY (GLENWOOD SPRINGS). COLORADO
TELEPHONE: (970) 945-8212 , r INSPECTION LIVE: (970) 384 5003
PERMIT Na PARCEL/SCHEDULE NO.
JOB ADDRESS: 0 /iCL ` A,,v r/,1, /W A- /1- ct
GG..CC�� �� [
I
LAT NO. BLOCK NO.
SUBDW1SION1D EMFTION
_ _
2
c7 t'/6ia G Vv,.. T /
6eizAmi /3' "-, L--------_
N.
%eL PT:
3
CareTIACTOL
e6/ZouP ,/, jut •
S. Ayzov ", '
'3920 PRO
, ' i) vi.-,
4
11k/Z1 / g45Ar 1.4 a/
' 7W
lsry s
5
so. rr. o' ammo -31,a,D
kl.rr. or urr 5- -
friarier
lam 27.0'armors
/74,0e1
6
l
(17,44f40/5 eeein 7y ,fitmer , , G/7
7
IlliCilli a 13U,!�/ft r J4 eg"/ ge9
8
CLAM arWAX wma:r au1D.AT t obava =wove
9
WAGI. CIr,w 01:0001u CA
IOI.t' allINGLI
I0
a CONLWAY MILT
oa+maM oeo (mIC) OUTS PUN
Aozr®ru.wrots j376, �LA,7q
VAwAilarorInitE i // .4? ea, 400
r
NOTICE
A SEPARATE ELECTRICAL PU.MTF IS REQUI3tED AND MUST ITE ISSUED
COLORADO.
THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK
AUTHORIZED IB NOT COMMENCED WITHIN Ito DAYS. OR Lc
WORK IS SUSPENDED OIL ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 110
AFTER. WORK LS COMMENCED
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED TILS
KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS
GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED WITH
THEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT
ALTECORTIY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PROVISIONS OF ANY
LOCAL LAW REGUL(TLNG CONSTRUCTION 'F TILE
04:110 .
BY THE STATE OF
OR CONSTRUCTION
CONSTRUCTION OR
DAYS AT ANY TIME
APPLICATION AND
OF LAWS
WHETHER SPECIFIER
PRESUME TO GIVE
OTHER STATE OR
PERFORMANCE OF
5/16/"Gt
KAN CHECR 1 :
31904,39
PERMIT FEE:
-6-S— 487 2 %
TITA". F152: DATE PERIET ISSUED:
OCC: (:ROUP: CONST: TYPE:
f f,4 _ 5,/ S-' 3 V AJ
u0 "'IFS 1 —
r
ZONT OE
SETBACKS:
iv, is _�, . ,.
yE:
L4DS NO. &FEE:
B,adsa • • P1mma Dap. Appt IDsta
AGREEMENT
PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO THE APPLICANT AS OWNER. CONTRACTOR ANIYOR THE AGNT OF THE CONTRACTOR OR OWNER TO CONSTRUCT TETE STRUCTURE A
DETAILED ON PLANS AND SPECW1CATTONS SUBMITTED TO AND REVIEWED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT.
IN CONSIDERATION OF THE ISSUANCE OF ITM PERMIT, THE SIGNER HEREBY A 7 SC,LtF TO COMPLY WTIB ALL BL11DLUO CODES AND LAND USE REGULATIONS ADOPTED B'
GARF ILD COUNTY PUTISUANI TO AUTHORITY GIVEN IN 30.21.201 CRS AS AMENDED. THE SIGNER FURTHER AGREES THAT IF THE ABOVE SAID ORDLtiANCES ARE NOT FL'LL'
COMPLIED wait DI THE LOCATION, ERECTION, CONSTRUCTION AND USE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED STRUCTURE, THE PERMIT MAY 1WN BE REVOKED BY NOTICE FROM
THE COUNTY ANI) THAT THEN AND THERE rr S1iAL BECOME NULL ANT> VOID.
THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT BASED UPON PLANS. SPECIFICATION'S AND OTHEP DATA SHAM. NOT PREVENT THE BUB,DINO OFFICIAL FROM THEREAFTER REQUIRING ITB
CORRECTION OF ERRORS LN SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER. DATA OR FRO PREVENTING BUILDINO OPERATION RENO CARRIED ON THEREUNDER WHEN L]
VIOLATION OF THIS CODE OR ANY OTTER ORDDDANCE OR REGULATION OF THIS JURISDICTION.
THE REVIEW OF THF. SUBMITTED PUNS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND INSPECTIONS CONDUCTED THEREAFTER DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ACCEPTANCE OF AN'
RESPONSIBILITIES OR LIABILITIES BY GARFIELD COUNTY FOR ERRORS, OMISSIONS OR DISCREPANCIES. THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THESE HEMS AND IMPTEM+IENTAT10:
DURING CONSTRUCTION RESTS SPECIFICALLY yarn THE ARCHITECT, DESECRIER. BUILDER AND OWNER COMMENT'S ARE MENDED TO BE VAT/VE AND Al SUPPOR'
OF THE OWNERS INTEREST. /:•
Gaifom .003 1 HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND,THE AGREEMENT ABOVE.
4E---
The following items are required by Garfield County for a final inspection:
1. A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector;
2. Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department posted where readily
visible from access road;
3. A finished roof, a lockable house, complete exterior siding, exterior doors and windows
installed, a complete kitchen with cabinets, a sink with hot & cold running water, non-absorbent
kitchen floor coverings, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove and refrigerator, all
necessary plumbing;
4. A complete bathroom, with washbowl, tub or shower, toilet stool, hot and cold running water,
non-absorbent floors and walls finished and a privacy door;
5. All steps outside or inside over three (3) steps must have handrails, guard rails on balconies or
decks over 30" high constructed to all 1994 UBC requirements;
6. Outside grading done to where water will detour away from the building;
7. Exceptions to the outside steps, decks and grading may be made upon the demonstration of
extenuating circumstances, i.e. weather, but a Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until
all the required items are completed and a final inspection made.
A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE ABOVE
ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED.
****CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY
(C.O.) IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL BE
CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATING
PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET.
understand and agree to abide by the -above conditions for occupanc use and the issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy for the dwelling under building permit #
,.7
Date
Plans to be included for a Building Permit must be on draft paper at least 18"x 24"" and drawn to
scale.
Plans must include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations all sides with
decks, balcony steps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the finish grade
line. A section showing in detail., from the bottom of the footing to the top of the roof, including
re -bar, anchor bolts, pressure treated plates, floor joists, wall studs and spacing, insulation,
sheeting, house -rap, (which is required), siding or any approved building material.
A window schedule. A door schedule.
A floor framing plan, a roofing framing plan, roof must be designed to withstand a 40 pound per
square foot. up to 7,000 feet in elevation, an 80 M.P.H. windshear, wind exposure B, windload of
15 pounds per square foot and a 36 inch frost depth.
All sheets to be identified by number and indexed. All of the above requirements must be met or
your plans will be returned.
All plans submitted must be incompliance with the 1997 UBC, UMC and 1997 UPC.
Applicants are required to indicate appropriately and to submit completed checklist at time
of application for a permit:
1. Is a site plan included that identifies the location of the proposed structure, additions or
other buildings, setback easements, and utility easements showing distances to the
property lines from each corner of the proposed structure prepared by a licensed surveyor
and has the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing? Slopes of 40% or
more o,n� roperties must be show on site plan.
Yes AO —(Gc.N77 /, IY
2. Does the site plan when applicable include the location of the I.S.D.S. (Individual Sewage
Disposal System) and distances to the property lines, wells (on subject property and
adjacent properties), streams or water courses? This information must be certified by a
licensed surveyor with their signature and professional stamp on the design.
Yes No 7( Not necessary for this project
3. Are the plans submitted for application construction drawings and not drawings that are
stamped or marked identifying them as "Not for construction, for permit issuance only",
"Approval drawings only", "For permit issuance only" or similar language?
Yes 7 No Not necessary for this project
2
4. Is the I.S.D.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System) designed, stamped and signed by a
Colorado Registered Engineer?
Yes No Not necessary for this project 2‹.
5. Does the site plan indicate the location and direction of the State, County or private road
accessing the property?
Yes
6. Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all
reinforcing steel in accordance with the uniform building code or per stamped engineered
design?
Yes / No Not necessary for this project
7. If the building is a pre-engineered structure, is there a stamped, signed engineered
foundation plan for this building?
Yes X No Not necessary for this project
8. Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl
spaces and the clearances required between wood and eart?
Yes No Not necessary for project
9. Do the plans indicate the size and location of the ventilation openings for the attic, roof
joist spaces and soffits?
Yes/ No Not necessary for this project
10. Do the plans include design loads as required under the Uniform Building Code for roof
snowloa s, (a minimum of 40 pounds per square foot in Garfield County)?
Yes No Not necessary for this project
11. Do the plans include design loads as required for floor loads under the Uniform Building
Code Chapter 16 and Tables 16A, 16B and 16C?
Yes le.
No Not necessary for this project
12. Does the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor, and
roof construction?
Yes 1 ' No Not necessary for this project
13. Is the wind speed and exposure design included in the plan?
Yes No /" Not necessary for this project
r7
14. Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists, wall studs,
ceiling joists, roof rafters or joists or trusses?
3
t,
Yes No Not necessary for this project
15. Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method of positive
connectt''°n of all columns and beams?
Yes /' No Not necessary for this project
16. Does the plan indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the highest
point of the building or addition measured at mid span between the ridge and the eave
down to existing grade contours?
Yes No Not necessary for this project
17. Does the plan include any stove or zero clearance fireplace planned for installation
including make and model and Colorado Phase II certifications or Phase II EPA
certification?
Yes No Not necessary for this projecX
18. Does the plan include a masonry fireplace including a fireplace section indicating design to
comply with the Uniform Building Code Chapter 31?
Yes No Not necessary for this projec
19. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that egress/rescue windows
from sleeping rooms and/or basements comply with the requirements of the Uniform
Build'Code?
Yes 7 No Not necessary for this project
20. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that windows provide
natural ligit and ventilation for all habitable rooms?
Yes No Not necessary for this project
21. Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass doors,
glazing immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used
as a walking surface; sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub
enclosures and specify safety glazing for these areas?
Yes X No Not necessary for this project
22. Do the plans include a complete design for all mechanical systems planned for installation
in this b ilding?
Yes No Not necessary for this project
23. Have all areas in the building been accurately identified for the intended use? (Occupancy
as idfled in the Uniform Building Code Table 5-A)
Yes A No Not necessary for this project
4
24. Does the plan indicate the quantity, form, use and storage of any hazardous materials that
may use in this building?
Yes No Not necessary for this project
25. Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces, boilers and water heaters
indicaton the plan?
Yes % No Not necessary for this project
26. Do the plans indicate the location and dimension of restroom facilities and if more than
four em loyees and both sexes are employed, facilities for both sexes?
Yes No Not necessary for this project
27. Do the plans indicate that restrooms and access to the building are handicapped
access' e?
Yes No Not necessary for this project
28. Have tjo (2) complete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the application?
Yes No
29. Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other
constru ion code requirements?
Yes 7 No Not necessary for this project
30. Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a
final ins tion by the Garfield County Building Department?
Yes No
31. Do you understand that approval for design and/or construction changes are required
prior to the implementation of these changes?
Yes/ No
32. Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a "Plan Review" fee from
you at the time of application and that you will be required to pay the "Permit" fee as well
as any "Septic System" or "Road Impact" fees required, at the time you pick up
your building permit? a�N�
Yes o v (�
33. Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the Uniform
Building Code including approval on a final inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of
Accucy and occupancy of the building?
Yes A No
5
i
34. Are you aware that the person signing the Permit Application whether the "Owner",
Agent of the Owner", "General Contractor„ "Contractor” Contractor or otherwise, signing the
application is the party responsible for the project complying with the Uniform Codes?
Yes X No
35. Are you aware that twenty-four (24) hour notice is required for all inspections?
Inspections will be made from Battlement Mesa to West Glenwood in the mornings
and from Glenwood Springs to Carbondale, in the afternoon. Morning inspections
must be called in by 12:00 p.m. the day before; afternoon inspections must be called
in by 4:00 p.m. the day before. Failure to give twenty-four (24) hour notice for
inspections wi delay your inspection one (1) day. Inspections are to be called in to
384-5003.
36. Are you aware that prior to issuance of a building permit you are required to show proof
of a driveway access permit or obtain a statement from the Garfield County Road &
Bridge Department stating one is not necessary? You can contact the Road & Bridge
Department at 625-8601.
Yes NS --G UNTJ
37. Do you understand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed
Electrician and Plumber to perform installations and hookups? The license number will be
requir d t time of inspection.
Yes No
38. Are you aware, that on the front of the building permit application you will need to fill in
the Parcell Schedule Number for the lot you are applying for this permit on prior to
issuance of the building permit? Your attention in this is appreciated.
Yes >(L Nu _ %U,v
I hereby acknowledge that I have read, understand, and answered these questions to
the best of my ability.
Signature
Z1/240 a A91/1
J/41 (9,-/-1
6
Date
c;
•
Phone: gdl 91 1 "days); (evenings)
Project Name: 4,9eAmi, ,4 ,#"7 /
Project Address: 1/1(20
If you answered "No" on any of these questions you may be required to provide this information
at the request of the Building Official prior to beginning the plan review process. Delays in
issuing the permit are to be expected. Work may not proceed without the issuance of the permit.
*If you have answered "Not necessary for this project" on any of the questions and it is
determined by the Building Official that the information is necessary to review the application and
plans to determine minimum compliance with the adopted codes, please expect the following:
A. The application may be placed behind more recent applications for building permits in the
review process and not reviewed until required information has been provided and the application
rotates again to first position for review.
B. Delay in issuance of the permit.
C. Delay in proceeding with construction.
*If you answered "No" to this question the circumstances described in the question could result in
a "Stop Work Order" being issued or a "Certificate of Occupancy" not being issued.
Bpcomm
04/02
7
• 1ur25-2002 10:24an Frcr-CLC GR•OU?
Keenan Consulting Group
Englneering Consultants .
June 25, 2002
Garfield Carty Building Depe tmerrt
RE Garfield County Maintenance Facility
A
Garfield CoUntY Road and
Vehicle Storage Platy
3037414549
T -30E P 0041005 F-323
2174 South Broadway • Deriver, Colorado • 80210-4402
103; Z824411 • mx 2824412 • E -Mail: lave nc wrrcipmen •
BEST COPY
Ftespcnse to Aspertrient Me t anlwl Revkav Calnrnta:
ITEM S. Cal Metro Is regarding spill aontalrenent are attaa ed we the re$pankt.
ITEM koro for the sand and oil interceptors are provided with this respanse.
TT1e plunrbtn,7 draaMrags as Pied by our Woe are in compliance +rte the 1997 !PC.
The mechanical drawing' as prepped by our Mos ere in mmpltenci will the 1997 WC.
The exile= systems for the bui Idlrtps hem been reviewed. The waist systems comply
with than 1997 UDC, Q>epar 12 as approptists to the tom panty classification.
If there bre any tp.iestlore or If wa can furnish additional it to,TT boa please aatact ott
office.
Kecnati Consulting, Group
Engineering Consultants CO-
Project
Project No,
Sheet No. ' Of T--�
By
. •
Date
•
.r..l_..
-oZ
CesgrAiNttil
I -A}(4£5 .i .. corkS1764 Kitt_ ..: :.1i 5 2G) i '. ...
cry
315. 'Pr
AT , > •:. ne".ti Sri - ..4 riN
- = - 31ST -r' . 3
e` 14 4 m.:
l K�
Pt -ANIS )4 U[ , i$�r -" --•. ' enc- Z.40 vx 1;1%5-
eitOrrn -
614 5 >< 2- a o L'.
Lpcy“Y.s� c�K/annAD►c�. \
•577 G/k-- tPrt) eft-. 1mrp78'if Iftp
-tSaO 4)54-
Te - cat.frrn Nom, lsio,
Z340 .
7.4 41-7'
Co.stP r•i leaL
z39077. 4s -t. - 3zJ:- 3•�
1- C6 J TP4 u rh Ga` -1 S _ r\s ref._ yLoavk
1..r 1�.loul.v : - Z - Th 1574._ 2." pira° - .. .
oN Tfrs 1 /Nytdt p% Goy LC EX o0 -r
il4t-w''‘. •
C1v1r:
Jun -26-2042 10:24an Frcrr-OC GROUP
%to mbar
irlortorring Consultants
3037/14549
T-3CE P 005/005 F-323
Project Project No.
sheet No. 01
By
jam' 7'•, • l C:43 .. '
14477E4 C."
. 1
i.... l
•
.ice;.._....:
.• .FLi 7`h..
:ie90 : ,r .:.....
•
ACCA,41:1 3,4
• FL InAl+uS= z. apt 4. 8. r ....
S
is -ti . v7112, 440 5r44 n
.1116 jun-26-2002 10!22aa Frcm-CMC GROUP 3027414540 T -30E A 002/0D3 F-323
TAui IPOrrOC1I
ti. Ka:.LY 01.4111*
10}ar e. liaaa�rr
Z E I E E R- P E N N O C K, I N C. / O H A
A R C H I T E C T S - E N G I N E E R S
June 28, 2002
Garfield County Building Department
Re: Maintenance and Storage Buildings for Garfield County
This report is a response to item 7 of the Plans Review Comments.
A. The live loads used in design of the Blabs are In accordance with the loads in
Table 15-A of the UBC.
B. Sec.1701 of the UBC requires Special inspections when certain criteria) is
used in design. The Specific sections in 1701.5 in the Code that apply to the
materials used in these buildings are: 1. Concrete; 2. Bolts In Concrete; 4.
Reinforcing Steel; 5. Structural Welding; and 6. High Strength Bolting.
In each of the sections referred to there are exceptions to the requirement for
Special Inspections. Generally, the exceptions apply. We understand field
observations will bs provided by Garfield County inspectors.
1. Concrete - Concrete is specified to be 3000 psi for foundations and 4000
psi for slabs. Slabs on grade are an exception and foundation concrete
that does not require an fc' higher than 2500 psi are an exception. The
drawings call for higher strength concrete not because hlgtser strength is
required, but for better workabiflty and finishing. Concrete tenting is still
required to ensure we achieve the desired mix and strength
characteristic s. Inspections of the reinforcing should be made to ensure
proper placement.
2. Bolts in Concrete - No stress increases were used for the bolt load
calculations. Therefore, per the UbC no special Inspections are required.
4. Reinforcing Steel - See item 1. above.
5. Structural Welding - The majority of all welding will be done In an
approved fabricator's shop which Is the first exception to Special
inspections. What field welding there is, is all single pass welding at
3/18", fess than the exception requirement of 6115` which is exception 2.1.
6. High Strength Bolting - Ail bolted connections are bearing connections
and not friction connections and therefore, do not require special
inspections,
C. The rigid frames of the metal buildings should have thelr connections
observed to ensure all bolts have been Installed, but special inspections for
friction bolted connections are not required.
2137 BRYANIT ST. Zulus 611 DZP4VIR, COLORADO 10211 (313) 411-3527 Ina (303) 451.3701
iiun -26-2002 10:234m Fro' -CMC GROUy
-,-. _ ,
3037414546 T-3CE P 003/005 F -3I3
D. Engineered stamped drawings of the metal buildings are submitted with this
response.
Respectfully bmItted,
Paul R. Pennock, P.E.
Principals
Zeller -Pennock, IneJOHA
PRP/mky
CADCODE
1229 Pitkin Avenue
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601
(970) 384-1515
Notes to Building Official
Garfield County Vehicle Storage Building
And Vehicle Maintenance Building
Rifle Hunter Mesa Road
June 10, 2002
A review of the plans for the Garfield County Vehicle
Storage Building and Vehicle Maintenance Building for
conformance to UBC requirements was performed at a level
customary to the trade. Except for the "red -lined" notes on the
.plans and Conditions of Permit, which are expected to be field
enforced, and the Plan Review Correction List which should be
resolved prior to the issuance of the Building Permit, general
UBC code compliance was found for the Garfield County Vehicle
Storage Building and Vehicle Maintenance Building
The structural plans are stamped by an engineer licensed in the
state of Colorado. Cadcode did not review these plans for
structural compliance as they are stamped. The Building
Official should be aware structural reviews performed by Cadcode
are not performed by an engineer or architect licensed in the
State of Colorado. See the Plan Review Correction List,
Conditions List, and the Building Department copy of the
redlined plans for structural details comments made by Cadcode.
Plans were not checked for UPC and UMC compliance although notes
calling for general compliance with these codes are included.
The mechanical and plumbing plans are stamped by an engineer
licensed in the state of Colorado.
Additional information is needed from the applicant regarding
the quantities of hazardous materials that will be used and
stored before the building can be classified. Therefore the
Conditions of Permit cannot be generated until this information
is provided.
Project valuation -
(Garage Type V Wood Frame - $26.50 x
(Wareouse/storage Type V Wood Frame -
(Office Type V Wood Frame - $63.00 x
.81 = $21.47)
$25.50 x .81 = $20.66)
.81 = $51.03)
Vehicle Storage Building -
Vehicle storage area - 8696 sq.ft. x 21.47 =
Mezz. storage area - 2619 x 20.66 =
Office area - 2619 x 51.03 =
Building valuation
$ 186703.1..
54108.54
133647.57
$ 374459.23
Vehicle Maintenance Building -
Vehicle maint. area - 17533 sq.ft. x 21.47 = $ 376433.51
Mezz. storage area - 4000 x 20.66 - 82640.00
Office area - 3000 x 51.03 - 153090.00
Building valuation - $ 612163.51
Project valuation (both buildings) - $ 986622.74
Building Permit Fee - $ .6G 5 54 5. �1
Plan Check Fee - $ 365. 56 3 (,o4 , 39
Fee Due Cadcode - $
•
GLENWOOD SPRINGS BUILDING INSPECTION DEPARTMENT
806 Cooper Avenue
Glenwood Springs, Co. 81601
(970) 945-2575
Plan Review Correction List
Garfield County Vehicle Storage Building
And Vehicle Maintenance Building
Rifle Hunter Mesa Road
June 10, 2002
The following comments based on the 1997 edition of the
Uniform Building Code shall be resolved prior to the issuance of
the building permit. The purpose of this review is to provide
for minimum protection of life, limb, health, property,
environment and for the safety and welfare of the consumer and
general public as regulated by the UBC.
1. The Maintenance Building plans show welding storage.
The project architect Raul Gawrys confirmed open flame welding
on vehicles will occur on site. The structure therefore must be
classified as either an H-2, H-3 or H-4 occupancy due to the use
of open flame and use and storage of flammable liquids and
gases. The H occupancy classification is dependent upon the
quantities of flammable liquids and gases in use and/or in
storage as referenced in Table 3-D. The applicant needs to
provide information on the type and amounts of flammable and
hazardous materials to be used (e.g. number of welding tanks
stored and used at any one time) and the number of vehicles that
will be stored or worked on in the building at any given time
while welding operations are occurring. As an H-2, the
structure cannot be built as designed. The mezzanine is framed
with wood, therefore making the structure Type V -N, governing
the starting point for allowable areas. The fire suppression
system cannot be used to increase the allowable areas for H-2
occupancies per Sec. 505.3. As an H-3 or H-4, the structure can
be built as designed using allowable area increases for yards
and sprinkler systems. Perhaps the best solution is to create
an H-3 or H-4 welding Bay with a 1 hour occupancy separation
creating an adjacent S-3 repair garage involving only the
exchange of parts (no open flames in the area). Welding storage
areas should be in approved separated closets or cabinets per
Sec. 307. Provide details for approval.
2. Provide a site plan for the project showing, parking,
drainage, accessibility to entrances and site facilities, and wjoilzat
all other information necessary to verify compliance with all
applicable Garfield County codes. The electrical site plan
provided was used for determining distances to property lines.
Sec. 106.
3. Specify the uses of the mezzanines. Sec. 106.
4. Walls and floors between the B office areas and the
S -3/H-3 & 4 occupancies shall be separated by 1 -hour
construction, a -+ �'
an ft 2 occvps `i.es . The
Provide listings for the block wall and floor/ceiling 0410 `
assemblies. Sec. 302. 701. Where masonry construction is used
block thicknesses and cell sizes should be specified in NI
accordance with Table 7-B to verify fire rating of the wall
assemblies.
5. Provide information on the quantities of oil to be 1p0c4A
stored and provide spill containment compliance per Sec. 307.
Hazardous materia] listings shall be provided for all hazardous
materials.
6. The plumbing and mechanical plans do not reference
the 1997 IPC and UMC. It is beyond the scope of the Building
department to verify compliance of the oil separator required by
Sc. 311.2.3.1 with the IPC. The mechanical engineer should
verify that oil separator and all other aspects of the plumbing
plans comply with the 1997 IPC, and that the mechanical plans
comply with all provisions of the 1997 UMC. The mechanical
engineer shall also verify compliance with of the exhaust
systems for the buildings with Sec. 1202..?V'S UBC 2.q
7. The structural notes should indicate that slabs have
been designed in accordance with the loads required by Table 16-
A UBC. In addition, the structural engineer shall verify that
the welding, bolts in concrete, and other aspects of
construction do not warrant special inspection based on the
design loads per Sec. 1701. Verify requirements for special
inspection of the metal building erection with the Building
Official. Provide engineered stamped metal building plans for
approval.
8. Doors 104, 105, and 207 do not comply with the
accessibility provisions of Sec. 1105, ANSI A117.1
9. Refer to the Conditions of Permit and redlined plans
for other code requirements.
9 -9
GLENWOOD SPRINGS BUILDING INSPECTION DEPARTMENT
806 Cooper Avenue
Glenwood Springs, Co. 81601
(970) 945-2575
Plan Review Correction List #2
Garfield County Vehicle Storage Building
And Vehicle Maintenance Building
Rifle Hunter Mesa Road
July 2, 2002
The following is a reply to the response from the
architect to the Plan review Correction List. The items below
shall be resolved prior to the issuance of the
Building Permit, or if approved by the Building Official, may be
resolved prior to construction or installation of the applicable
phase of construction. The purpose of this review is to provide
for minimum protection of life, limb, health, property,
environment and for the safety and welfare of the consumer and
general public as regulated by the UBC.
1. The response from the architect does not appear to
provide the separation necessary to form 2 distinct occupancies,
S-3 & H-4 in the repair/maintenance area in the Maintenance
Building. The block wall as shown on the plans is a short wall
and open to the remainder of the repair area above the wall.
The back of the bay is open to the remainder of the building as
shown on the plans. The welding curtain does not appear to
provide a one hour separation,A listing for the curtain was not
provided for review by the architect. The building however can
be built as an H-4/B/S-1 occupancy due to allowable yard and
sprinkler increases and the quantities of oxygen and acetylene
to be used and stored as represented by the applicant to the
Building Official (4 canisters each, less than 250 cu. ft. per
canister). Ii quantities exceed the exempt amounts on Table 3-0,
approved control areas will be required,and„additional Building
Permits will be required for review and inspection.
2. The site plan provided does not include a drainage
plan. Accessible parking spaces are not shown. Provide
accessible parking spaces and accessible routes and access per
Sec. 1101, 1103. Provide site drainage per Sec. 1804 and the
soils report noted on the plans. Sec. 106.
3. The storage uses of the mezzanines over the offices
cannot be considered part of the S-3 or H-4 occupancies in
either building as they will be used to store all kinds of
materials from various departments and shall be classified as S-
1 occupancies. Therefore a 1 hour occupancy separation with 1
hour protected openings will be required per Table 3-B. Two
exits must be provided however from the enclosed mezzanine
storage areas, and one must access directly to a corridor or the
exterior per Sec. 507.4 Exc. 2. If the 2° exit does not access
a corridor or the exterior, then they will be considered as
stories. This is also acceptable as the S-1 occupancies are
•
•
permitted on a second story in II -N or V -N construction. Table
5-B. The smaller mezzanine in the Maintenance Building next to
the wash bay is approximately 1000 sq. ft. with an occupant load
of less than 10. It needs to be separated by a 1 hour fire
resistive occupancy separation with protected openings but only
1 exit is required.
4. OK - solid CMU walls will meet the requirements and
no separation is required between the S-1 and B occupancies.
The smaller mezzanine in the Maintenance Building is over the
H-4 occupancy. A 1 hour floor/ceiling assembly is should be
provided.
5. The letter was not provided however quantities were
called in to the Building official over the phone. The
architect shall provide revised plans for the containment
facilities for the oil storage area as discussed at the meeting
with the contractor, owner, architect and Building Official.
6 OK
7. OK - except additional clarification of the metal
building design specs is required. The design loads specified
show a 30 psf live load for the frames and roof system, 32.7
roof snow load, but a ground snow load of 40 psf. Please verify
that these loads comply with the roof loads required by the
Garfield County Code for roofs.
8. OK
9. Refer to the Conditions of Permit and redlined plans
for other code requirements.
loct,A F4/
A107 /1` 4— S- 3- 13 Oc-c.�.l s.y
1140- Als--1444/
I114-r.,L 111)L..(C. L.12-11
I
a W PLy IJA-44,1 651244.)
FW -L1 G u.cpta 5 i. .-4 / 'AI
1!4O3
tl
1
'492-ir-. ."11 POgr
�cv 44.L R.AWAL4 TANS .1 /tug ior
44-F40-- - 0c064 Lar .
S R.g. Srwex. a Sir --F LI:P- y4140 otly S
c 11
Triffai*i-C 4o, 7t FiLL ALL C Es ON
I Sw r4a .
SD°S4 oF Q,c..
SrrR.. 41K4 _ ? *' .
PLAA/paES 7-Faz.?4tisi% SrviticC .
/Ul t c. 1-+,t41 044F-ieS iftr
441-0 .S /oic. •
Smr. ,,
gargs
ON / L C.4414-04 M .Pet—r
i01,.4 44*k01. '`viAal.ct.N /4.FICI To Wi uZ) !T" cADOut,
a� ear# 7b +mss++ ( ?LA% P•�w, .
s u -v IIE • c_ Q , -4-144-, /Ka -Cs
�r�-,uca
g2.1741,7 *rtCZ
i 'J1N 37 P a �,eI CO
1_K4uL *)AY3 4C
4Ptia-101-
3/77t, 0e4I' lq
4) - .cce. Ors -4 • ~ 01- 46:-.9-o S -2 -PO Z1� I [.r2 - r 8e/,
s� _ E Z 1
11-4 N2,3
i e.22Ccr714Ar7c-fig, AX -4-14 S -a) cr ac_
-
Sint T -Sr rx.iLreit c'cl 6,4*,
.. /lay l'i r L 10 /-5 5
_
Raul Gawrys
Architecture 1 Planning
•
•
June 26, 2002
•
Garfield County Building Department
806 Cooper Avenue
Glenwood Springs, Colorado
• •
RE: Plan Review Response
Garfield County Vehicle Storage Building
And Vehicle Maintenance Facility
1. In response to item #1, the building should be classified as a S3 (Repair Garage),
13(Office) with a confined area for a H4 use with open flame. This H4 use will be
separated from the S3 use by the concrete block wall as shown on plans and a protective
curtain to be put in place when welding does occur. Welding will not be a daily practice
and will only occur if a vehicle needs repair.
2. A site plan from Sopris Engineering is attached as part of this response.
3. The mezzanines will be used for long term or seasonal storage from various
departments.
4. The B office arca will be separated from the S3 /H4 uses by a 1 -hour separation.
The 8" concrete block wall is fully grouted and should meet all requirements as stated in
Table 7-B. The floor ceiling system will also have a 1- hour separation. This will be
achieved by either a 5/8" gypboard ceiling fastened to the bottom of the steel bar joists
with concrete topping, or continuing the mezzanine wall to the ceiling.
5. A letter from the owner is attached to address storage of materials.
6. A letter is attached to address compliance with the 1PC and UMC.
7. Refer to attached letter.
8. The doors in question will have the swing reversed to make the comply with section
1105.
9. Have not received a set of redlines if there are other issues to address.
River View Plaza • 100 Elk Run Drive • Suite 222 • P.O. Box 825 • Basalt. Colorado 81621
970 927-441 1 • Fax 97(1 927-4069
REV
C.O 2 PROJECT DESIGN DATA
BUILDING SYSTEM DESIGN CRITERIA
BUILDING(S) (A) & (B)
LIVE LOAD
FRAMES 30.0 PSF
ROOF SYSTEM 30.0 PSF
GROUND SNOW LOAD 40.0 PSF
ROOF SNOW LOAD 32.7 PSF
WIND VELOCITY 80.0 MPH
ORDER No.
02-4214
DATE :5/14/02
BY : MR _
PAGE : PD2 OF.5
i/e cevoL,fiii,„,e--
f'
(IMPORTANCE FACTOR I.00)
(IMPORTANCE FACTOR 1.00)
ExPOSURE C
SEISMIC ZONE 1 (IMPORTANCE FACTOR 1.00)
DEAD LOAD THE WEIGHT OF THE METAL BUILDING
COMPONENTS AS IT OCCURS
COLLATERAL LOADS
UNIFORM LOAD 5.0 PSF @ BLDG.A
5.0 PSF @ BLDG. B
MEZZANINE LIVE LOAD 125 PSF
DEAD LOAD 50 PSF
TOP RUNNING ELECTRIC BRIDGE CRANES (SEE PD3)
LOADS APPLIED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
1997 UNIFORM BUILDING CODE
MAY 15 2402
REV
C.O.--2---
PROJECT DESIGN DATA
ORDER NO.
02-4214
DATE :5/14/02
BY MR
PAGE : PD3 OF 5
AUXILIARY DESIGN LOAD REQUIREMENTS
CRANE SYSTEMS: REF. DRAWINGS FOR CRANE AISLE(S) LOCATION
1. CRANE AISLE OPERATION: 2. LONGITUDINAL DIAGONAL
CRANE BRACING
CRANE
AISLE NO.
SINGL,
MULTIPLE
CRANE
NO.
CRANE
NOS.
POSITIVE
SEPERATION
NO.
DISTANCE
1
---
1,2
--
BY
MESCQ
1
----
•
------
-
------
LONGITUDINAL BRACING IS AT
CRANE
AISLE NO.
BLDG.
AREA
BAY
NO.
COL. NO.
OR SL
1
A
3,4
@RIGID FRAME
BY
BUYER
BY
MESCO
BY
BUYER
BY
MESCQ
1
----
•
------
-
3. RUNWAY MATERIAL PROVIDED IN THE METAL BUILDING SYSTEM
CRANE
AISLE NO.
TOP RUNNING CRANES
UNDER RUNNING / MONORAIL CRANES
RAIL ASSY. RUNWAY BEAM ASSY.
RUNWAY BEAM ASSY.
_
SUSPENSION
SYSTEM ASSY
BY
MESCO
BY
BUYER
BY
MESCO
BY
BUYER
BY
MESCO
BY
BUYER
BY
MESCQ
1
----
•
------
-
------
4. CRANE LOADS
VERTICAL IMPACT: 10
LATERAL FORCE 1Q %
LONGITUDINAL FORCE 10 %
5. CRANE DATA AND CRANE BUILDING DIMENSIONS
SEE ATTACI3ED SHEETS
ria 1.
REV.
C.O.
PROJECT DESIGN DATA
CRANE DATA AND CRANE BUILDING DIMENSIONS
5T-8 64RAIL
J
20
2 �8
TWO - 5 TON TOP RUNNING SINGLE GIRDER ELECTRIC CRANE
MANUFACTURER : P&H
WHEEL LOAD WITHOUT IMPACT : 8450 LB
HOIST AND TROLLEY WEIGHT : 1985 LB
TOTAL WEIGHT : 11888 LB
WHEEL BASE 8'-6"
RUNWAY BEAM (ESTIMATE) 60 #/FT
RAIL (NOT BY MESCO) 40 lb/yd
ORDER No.
02-4214
DATE :4/17/02
BY :HD
PAGE : PD4 OF 5
VA IA 20u
REV.
C.O.
PROJECT DESIGN DATA
ORDER No.
02-4214
DATE :4/17/02
BY :HD
PAGE : PD5 OF 5
CRANE BUILDING SYSTEM
To INSURE THE PROPER PERFORMANCE OF THE CRANE BUILDING AND CRANE SYSTEM(S)
REFER TO THE APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE LATEST EDITION OF THE 'Low RISE
BUILDING SYSTEMS MANUAL' RELATING TO TETE FOLLOWING SUBJECTS :
1. ERECTION OF THE RUNWAY SYSTEM,
RUNWAY SUPPORT &/OR SUSPENSION SYSTEM,
AND THE METAL BUILDING SYSTEM.
2. INSTALLATION OF THE CRANE SYSTEM AND THE CRANE ITSELF.
3. OPERATION OF THE CRANE SYSTEM.
4. MAINTENANCE OF THE CRANE SYSTEM,
RUNWAY SYSTEM, RAIL SYSTEM AND RUNWAY SUPPORT
&/OR SUSPENSION SYSTEM.
MY I. 5 212
r.
Pi!
4111
xi w
4111 1/1
• ;111;!Ok
P if 1314 Pip
31 010
6 bil i e
111
1; pi4111
:d:1 x�
R
J
s
1
1
1
a
1
1
4g
I$
vivo NOIS3a i3 roltid
to
tJ9
•_€
1
1;71-
58
1 . '•
. J ..
1
li
.
CP
i
i
`
t,
=
d
c
F
JI
°
b
�+
J+
Zn
d
O
it
b
in
b
sv
in
S
cl,
b
I `
PA
-
1
H
H
IN
I
i
s
.
TS
a
tzoo
11i
8
A.
Q
01
`
d
N
yP
at
G
",n
Q
.:
O
00O
in
G
c
w
;n
r.
v�
!A
a
$4i
s
r'
-
-
_ ,
n
cn
T:-.
r_.
z
N �
gill
t i
tP
�
P
&.J&
�4-*+.4"+-•
3
Z
Z
df
z
�C1
���,,,,0
�
;m
;s; i
.Z
A
g
•
i
*
i
.,�i
�
4
���
11X
1
8
-n
Paw!
!ith
iil;�
tjtt
41111
qt
1 ` 1
1
0
2
8
9
i
k
A
A
..4,.-
A
A
t-.
s zo
::
�
O
H
O
n
1
7
P
Fn
w
r
1
deao,Atf:,
a
211
ao
g1i
0000
►:
n
21 I
5"
Ell
M
1,01)b0
IY
.F
L
7a
1 s
a
o
.n
0
k
,A
s
0
0
t
1
r
a g
o:
7.
i
111!1
1ri
Ilia
i
Ilii
a
;-_
t
F
11
i!t
i
.=
- 1
81
i
a
1
t-.
b.,
::
;
rc
P
Fn
w
r
1
a
211
►:
n
21 I
73,
o..ia
_py
_ang11p
o:
6
=
6
nn
t-.
b.,
::
;
rc
P
Fn
w
r
a
A
►:
n
73,
o..ia
_py
_ang11p
o:
6
=
6
la0
,
,7-'
kr
'41
4iNa
^5
1
W
y4
g
f'
N
i z
o
p
b,I.
4
0
rT
11
H
R
g1
E E
i
1gI
i
Ji
W
zP
'
.,'
a
0
38
?0
O
G`
b
,-•__5
6
/i
N
.-0
=
„E"-
a0
m
9crl
2
a
to
=cogilE
d
V
q8
-7
P-"
i4.'
I.n
1
! 1
t
1
1=
x
bE",.,1
O c
o
c
s
J1
1
I,r,IN5..e... on anck
9IX
E
Stip
�
-r �
�
x��
O
l
4
"f
g
r
iii
m11
M
1
!
f
DE TES: 11ON
TYPICAL PARKING
20' X 10' SPACE
R35'
1 I) •
;•-•S'('•1'•
p;
JUL 2 4 2002
GARFiELD COUNTY
BUILDING & PLANNING
-13
24'
R40. -
r _
I
8 =
CO11R
5S� fir
_ r -
- ; Y;.L P SPACES
S
20:: lE,' ID� SPACE
45'
•
CAP .PARKI 'C
20' X 12'
- CONCRETE EN1RY
-r
1-1.00.1- CAP PARKIN(;
20. x ;2.
CCV. lE;E SIDEWALK
P50'
35'
UTILITY AND ACCESS EASFIJEN-
FOR THE USE 0i- LOT 3, SECT ON I9
CURRENTLY OWNED BY RIhLE AND ASSOC
BOOK 477, PAGE 428
5' CONCRETE
LEGFNC
'6U'
1
JA.1,4.7,CLIV
JUL 7 LI
GAKHELD CUupi r
BUILDING & PLANNING
RECEIVED
JUL 2 4 2002
soGiAIZIELD COUNTY
ENING
DRAINAGE STUDY
FOR THE
GARFIELD COUNTY ROAD AND BRIDGE DEPARTMENT
MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION FACILITY
PREPARED FOR:
CMC GROUP
2450 S. DOWNING STREET
DENVER, COLORADO 80210
SUBMITTED TO:
GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING & PLANNING DEPARTMENT
109 8TH STREET, SUITE 100-C
GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81601-3360
PREPARED BY:
Sopris Engineering, LLC
502 Main, Suite M
Carbondale, CO 81623
SE Job No. 22012.01
April 2, 2002
502 Main Street • Suite A3 • Carbondale, CO 81623 • (970) 704-0311 • Fax (970) 704-0313
Sorais ENGINEER1NC• LLC
civil consultants
Gtech
April 23, 2002
CMC Group
Attn: Dick Benes
2450 South Downing Street
Denver, Colorado 80210
r
1,
Heporth-Pa«lak Geotechnical, Inc.
5020 County Kurd 154
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601
Phone: 970.945-7988
Fax: 970-945-8451
hpgeo@hpgcotech.com
�r//:r<<
RECD APR 2 6 2002
Job No. 102 190
Subject: Subsoil Study for Foundation Design, Proposed Shop and Storage
Buildings, Airport Property, County Road 333, Garfield County,
Colorado
Dear Mr. Benes:
As requested, Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. performed a subsoil study for
design of foundations at the subject site. The study was conducted in accordance with
our proposal for geotechnical engineering services to CMC Group dated March 11,
2002. The data obtained and our recommendations based on the proposed construction
and subsurface conditions encountered are presented in this report.
Proposed Construction: The proposed buildings will be 20,000 square feet and
11,000 square feet in size metal structures located on the site as shown on Fig. 1.
Ground floors will be slab -on -grade. Cut depths are expected to range up to about 6 to
8 feet. The grading plan was conceptual at the time of this study. Foundation loadings
are assumed to be moderate and typical of the proposed type of construction. Access
drives and parking areas will be located around the buildings.
If building conditions or foundation loadings are significantly different from those
described above, we should be notified to re-evaluate the recommendations presented in
this report.
Site Conditions: The site was vacant and covered with patches of snow at the time of
our field work. An existing single story steel frame and metal skin building is located
to the south. An access road had been rough graded up to the existing structure from
County Road 333. Overhead power lines are located to the west of the proposed
building sites. The ground surface is gently rolling with shallow erosional gullies, and
slopes down to the northwest at grades between 5% and 10%. Vegetation consists of
sagebrush.
Subsurface Conditions: The subsurface conditions at the site were evaluated by
observing 7 exploratory pits that had recently been dug at the approximate locations
shown on Fig. 1. The logs of the pits are presented on Fig. 2. The subsoils
encountered, below up to about 1 foot of topsoil, consist of stratified clay, silt and sand
overlying weathered to very hard siltstone/sandstone bedrock. Results of swell -
consolidation testing performed on relatively undisturbed samples of the upper fine-
CMC Group
April•23, 2002
Page 2
grained soils, presented on Figs. 4-6, indicate low compressibility under existing
moisture conditions and light loading and a low to moderate collapse potential
(settlement under a constant load) when wetted. The samples from Pit 3 and Pit 5
showed moderate to high compressibility with increased loading after wetting. The
laboratory testing is summarized on Table I. No free water was observed in the pits at
the time of our observation and the upper soils were slightly moist to moist.
Foundation Recommendations: Considering the subsurface conditions encountered in
the exploratory pits and the nature of the proposed construction, we recommend spread
footings placed on the siltstone/sandstone bedrock or compacted structural fill designed
for an allowable bearing pressure of 2,500 psf for support of the proposed buildings.
Footings that bear entirely on the bedrock can be designed for a 4,000 psf bearing
pressure. Required fill can consist of the on-site soils or suitable imported granular
material. We expect settlements to be on the order of '/2 to 1 inch and could be
differential between footings bearing on bedrock and structural fill. Placing the
footings entirely on bedrock or on imported granular material can be used to reduce the
differential settlement risk. Fill placed beneath footings should extend beyond the edge
of the footing a distance greater than or equal to the depth of fill beneath the footing and
be compacted to at least 100% of the maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture
content near optimum. Footings should be a minimum width of 16 inches for
continuous walls and 2 feet for columns. Fine-grained soils encountered at the
foundation bearing level within the excavation should be removed down to the
undisturbed bedrock. Exterior footings should be provided with adequate cover above
their bearing elevations for frost protection. Placement of footings at least 36 inches
below the exterior grade is typically used in this area. Continuous foundation walls
should be reinforced top and bottom to span local anomalies such as by assuming an
unsupported length of at least 12 feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining structures
should be designed to resist a lateral earth pressure based on an equivalent fluid unit
weight of at least 50 pcf for the on-site soil as backfill.
Floor Slabs: The natural on-site soils, exclusive of topsoil, are suitable to support
lightly loaded slab -on -grade construction. Subgrade materials consisting of hard
siltstone/sandstone bedrock should be suitable to support moderate to heavily loaded
slabs. To reduce the effects of some differential movement, floor slabs should be
separated from all bearing walls and columns with expansion joints which allow
unrestrained vertical movement. Floor slab control joints should be used to reduce
damage due to shrinkage cracking. The requirements for joint spacing and slab
reinforcement should be established by the designer based on experience and the
intended slab use. A minimum 4 inch layer of CDOT Class 6 road base should underlie
slab -on -grade. In clay subgrade areas, a minimum 1 foot layer of "pit run" granular
material should underlie the base course. The slabs can designed for a subgrade
modulus of 220 tcf in bedrock areas and 60 tcf in soil areas.
H -P GEOTECH
CMC Group
April 23, 2002
Page 3
All fill materials for support of floor slabs should be compacted to at Ieast 95 % of
maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Required fill
can consist of the on-site soils or suitable imported granular soils devoid of vegetation,
topsoil and oversized rock.
Access Drive and Parking Subgrade: We understand that it is desired to have a
gravel surface roadway and parking areas. Based on the clay subgrade conditions
encountered at the site, the following sections are recommended for roadways and
parking areas located around the buildings.
Location
Pit Run or Suitable
Granular Material
CDOT Class 6
Aggregate Base Course
Main Drive
18"
4"
Storage/Parking
12"
4"
Subgrade fill placed within roadway and parking areas can consist of the on-site soils
devoid of vegetation, topsoil or oversized rock.
Surface Drainage: The following drainage precautions should be observed during
construction and maintained at all times after the buildings have been completed:
1) Inundation of the foundation excavations and underslab areas should be
avoided during construction.
2) Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and
compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density in
roadway, parking and slab areas and to at least 90% of the maximum
standard Proctor density in landscape areas.
3) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be
sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions. We
recommend a minimum slope of 6 inches in the first 10 feet in unpaved
areas and a minimum slope of 3 inches in the first 10 feet in surrounding
roadway, parking and walkway areas. SwaIes may be needed uphill of
the buildings to direct surface runoff around the buildings.
4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of
all backfill.
Limitations: This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted
geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no
warranty either expressed or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted
in this report are based upon the data obtained from the exploratory pits observed at the
locations indicated on Fig. 1 and to the depths shown on Fig. 2, the proposed type of
construction, and our experience in the area. Our findings include interpolation and
H -P GEOTECH
CM(' Group
April 23, 2002
Page 4
extrapolation of the subsurface conditions identified at the exploratory pits and
variations in the subsurface conditions may not become evident until excavation is
performed. If conditions encountered during construction appear different from those
described in this report, we should be notified at once so re-evaluation of the
recommendations may be made.
This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes.
We are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. As
the project evolves, we should provide continued consultation and field services during
construction to review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations, and to
verify that the recommendations have been appropriately interpreted. Significant design
changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommendations
presented herein. We recommend on-site observation of excavations and foundation
bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a representative of the geotechnical
engineer.
If you have any questions or if we may be of further assistance, please let us know.
Sincerely,
HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
Trevor L. Knell
Reviewed by:
Steven L. Pawlak, P.
TLK/ksw
attachments
cc: Raul Gawrys Architect
Sopris Engineering - Attn: Yancy Nichol
Meldor Construction - Attn: Bo Simon
H -P GEOTECH
1
1
1
AIRPORT
1
\ \
(\‘
5610
-a
1 �
0
UTIUTY
EASEMENT 11 p
1 �
1 O•
1 / PIT 5
1
1
1
1
1
1 5620
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 5630
1
1
1
APPROXIMATE SCALE 1
1 " = 80' 1
5610
1
J
/
/
/
/
PIT 4
■
PIT 7
■
i
PROPOSED
BUILDINGS
PIT 6
■
i
i
i
5640
i
i
■
PIT 3
i
i
i
■
PIT 2
5620
5630
/
/
PIT 1
•
102 190
HEPWORTH-PAWLAK
GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY PITS
Fig. 1
Elevation — Feet
r
o a o
roN `n
ID ID N ID ID
in
F.F. 5624.3'
z
i
i
N_
M
M N N
tDc0 CO CO CO t0 t0
tr) u) U) u) U) u) U)
1111111111111111111111111111111
Elevation — Feet
8
Note: Explanation of symbols is shown
102 190
HEPWORTH — PAWLAK
GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
LOGS OF EXPLORATORY PITS I Fig. 2
LEGEND:
T
TOPSOIL; slightly organic silty sandy clay, firm, moist, dark brown.
CLAY (CL); silty to very silty, stiff to very stiff, slightly blocky, slightly moist to moist, light
brown to medium brown, slightly calcareous, low plasticity.
SAND (SC—SM); stratified, silty sand and clayey sand, medium dense, slightly moist to moist,
brown, low plasticity.
SILTSTONE/SANDSTONE BEDROCK; upper portion weathered, fractured and hard to cemented and
very hard with depth, relatively dry, olive—brown and tan. Wasatch Formation
2" Diameter hand driven liner sample.
Practical digging refusal.
NOTES:
1. Exploratory pits were observed on March 12, 2002.
2. The exploratory pits locations were provided by the client.
3. Elevations of the exploratory pits were obtained by interpolation between contours on the site plan
provided.
4. The exploratory pit locations and elevations should be considered accurate only to the degree implied
by the method used.
5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory pit logs represent the approximate boundaries
between material types and transitions may be gradual.
6. No free water was observed in the pits. Fluctuations in water level may occur with time.
7. Loboratory Testing Results:
WC = Water Content ( 7 )
DD = Dry Density ( pcf )
—200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve
LL = Liquid Limit (7 )
Pi = Plasticity index ( % )
102 190
HEPWORTH — PAWLAK
GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
LEGEND AND NOTES
Fig. 3
Compression
N — O
Compression %
3
0
1
2
3
4
5
Moisture Content = 10.2 percent
Dry Density = 106 pcf
Sample of: Sandy Clay
From:Pit 1 at 2 Feet
1
No movement
upon
wetting
0.1
1.0 10
APPLIED PRESSURE -- ksf
100
Moisture Content = 9.3 percent
Dry Density = 105 pcf
Sample of: Sandy Clay
From:Pit 3 at 2.5 Feet
Compression
upon
wetting
0.1
1.0 0
APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf
100
102 190
HEPWORTH—PAWLAK
GEOTECHNICAL. INC.
SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS
Fig. 4
tt
Compression
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Moisture Content = 8.8 percent
Dry Density = 82 pcf
Sample of: Sand and Silt
From: Pit 4 at 5 Feet
Compression
upon
wetting
0.1
1.0 10
APPUED PRESSURE -- ksf
100
102 190
HEPWORTH-PAWLAK
GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS
Fig. 5
Compression
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Moisture Content = 7.9 percent
Dry Density = 83 pcf
Sample of: Sand and Silt
From: Pit 5 at 4 Feet
Compression
upon
wetting
J
0.1
1.0 10
APPUED PRESSURE — ksf
100
102 190
HEPWORTH—PAWLAK
GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS
Fig. 6
0
Cr)
N
0
1--
6 6
z
co
0
FEB -20-1900 02:13
P. 01
Dick
FAX Transmittal
To Dick Benes
MOM CMC Group
Fax #: 1-303-741-4549
aatt July 11, 2002
TM lags 1
$E MINS lie. 22012.01
Fran: Mark Butler
Mesta= Plan Review Correction List
In reviewing the information requested under item #2 of the Plan Review Correction List lists two items
Accessible parking and site drainage
Handi-cap parking:
We have not identified any handicap parking on our Civil plan however all parking spaces are at grade and on
gravel without painted lines so that handi-cap spaces quid be placed within any of the designated parking areas or
adjacent to the building in any non -traffic area. Spaces would he marked with handi-cap signs. You or the owner
should be able to designate at your liking the (2) spaces required by the code.
Site drainage
Site drainage is shown on the grading and drainage plan so it would he my assumption that the building department
did not receive a copy of the Drainage Study we prepared with the building permit application. I believe you have a
copy of this. please let me know if you do not or if you would like to have us to direct malt a copy to the Building
department.
/1-77-430
502 main street • suite A3 • carbondale, CO 81623 • (970) 704-0311 • fax (970) 704-
0313
SOPRIS ENGINEERING • LLC
civil consultants
TnTd P r.11
CMC GROUP. INC.: GENERAL CONTRACTORS • DEVELOPERS • 2450 SOUTH DOWNING STREET • DENVER COLORADO 80210.303.741.4500 • FAX 303.741.4549
CMC
November 4, 2002
GARFIELD COUNTY
BUILDING INSPECTION DEPT.
101 West 8th Street, 2" d Floor
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Attn: Andy Schwaller
Reliable Ezperliae
Relentless Ezcellrnce
RECEIVED
Nov 0 Ei 2002
GARFIELD COUNTY
BUILDING & PLANNING
RE: Garfield County Vehicle Storage Building
and Vehicle Maintenance Building
Andy.
In response to your comments dated July 2, 2002, we offer the following:
Your item #
1 - Sent under separate cover by Architect -- Raul Gawrys
2 - See Attached Plan, Soils Report and Drainage Study
3 - Sent under separate cover by Architect - Raul Gawrys
4 -- Sent under separate cover by Architect - Raul Gawrys
5 - See Attached Plan and Tank Description
6 - Okay
7 - See Attached Letter
8 - Okay
9 - Okay
Please call with any questions.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Craig R. Benes
Executive Vice President
CMC Group, Inc.
CRB/de Enclosures
Jul.Ib. 2002 5:43PM
MESCO METAL BU1LDENaS
Corpora= OM=
PO Hous 20
gwpevil= , TX 76099-0020
8I7/488.8511
TOLL FREE 800/556-3726
FAX 817/329-2326
July 15, 2002
•
MESCO MEiAL BUILDINGS
Mr. Dick Benes
CMC Group, Inc.
2450 S. Downing St.
Denver, CO 80210-5812
A�
MESCO.
Re: Mesco Project 02-4214 Public Works Facility
Dear Mr. Benes:
1
No•1116 P. 2/2
MESCO METAL BUILDINGS
Easton Regional Mc*
PO Box 1207
Cagan. AL 35056
256/734-6514
TOIL FREE 864479-9696
FAX 256/734-6734
Regarding the design Ioad question from the Garfield County building inspector, we
have reviewed our design and found that the building is designed in accordance with
the local Ioad requirements as specified in the "Notice of Clarification' for Resolution
#96-05. Our building is designed for a snow load of 40 psf and a wind load of •80 mph
in accordance with the provisions of the 1997 Uniform Building Code:
Based upon our conversation this moming, we are proceeding with scheduling
shipment of this project at the earliest possible time. I will be contacting you as soon as
we have a firm delivery schedule.
Please call me if you have any questions concerning this matter.
Sincere
Ken C. Williams P.E.
Regional Manager
cc: file
"MAKING BUILDINGS THAT MAKE OUR BUILDERS THE BEST" 1‘1111_1001
INSPECTION WILL NOT BE MADE UNLESS
THIS CARD IS POSTED ON THE JOB
24 HOURS NOTICE REQUIRED FOR INSPECTIONS
BUILDING PERMIT
'4//
GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO
Date Issued . .A.er2.� .e✓'Z. tuned Area Permit No..in'" TO
AGREEMENT
In consideration of the issuance of this permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with all
laws and regulations related to the zoning, location; construction and erection of the proposed
structure for which this permit is granted, and further agrees that if the above said regulations
are not fully complied with in the zoning, location, erection and construction of the above
described structure, the permit may then be revoked by notice from the County Building
Insor and IMMEDIATELY BECOME NIJ, AND VOID.
Use �- Y£ O1 '
-t
Address or Legal lion .:i . ... "':jai
Owileart iej /, &� !_ ' " '1 Contractor 4.
Setbacks Front l 1 Side Rear
This Card Mast Be Posted So It is Plainly Visible From The Street Until Final Inspection.
INSPECTION RECORD
Footing 1
r
Foundation
Underground Plumbing 7_3 _a
Insulation
Rough Plumbing _6q//c0,...S.-24U/
Drywall
Chimney & Vent
Electric Final (by State Inspector) i 1 -Ll -U:; o.
Gas Piping
Final 12 ---(,--oz P' '
Electric Rough (By State Inspector)
Septic Final
Framing 4_13 -t77 1e°! 41.4pt^ E•loktein
�Itt
(To includeRoof in place and Windows
and Doors installed).
Notes
oi Ec,.•- twri -. 4,;.) - ,
r. r1 �„rY'� '�� y(:
T
ALL LISTED ITEMS MUST BE INSPECTED
WHETHER INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR,
AND APPROVED BEFORE COVERING -
UNDERGROUND OR ABOVE GROUND.
THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE
Phone 3845003 109 8th Street County Courthouse Glenwood Springs, Colorado.
APPROVEDDO NOT DESTROY THIS CARD
D
B
IF PLACED OUTSIDER COVER WITH CLEAR PLASTIC
INSPECTION WILL NOT BE MADE UNLESS
THIS CARD IS POSTED ON THE JOB
24 HOURS NOTICE REQUIRED FOR INSPECTIONS
BUILDING PERMIT
GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO
•Date Issued 7- 7 ! 04: Zoned Area Permit No 3446 A
AGREEMENT
In consideration of the issuance of this permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with all
laws and regulations related to the zoning, location; construction and erection of the proposed
structure for which this permit is granted, and further agrees that if the above said regulations
are not fully complied with in the zoning, location, erection and.construction of the above
described structure, .the permit may then be revoked by notice from the County Building
Inspector and IMMEDIATELY BECOME NULL AND VOID.
Use 40P»Lb. rani) at B1if &A SM (L g$)
Address or Legal Description 05 [/ e c 3,52_
Owner Gia F f fL D ppdel it Bei elkipoutrictor
Sctl2scks
Front Side Side
Rear
This Card Mast Be Posted So It is Plainly Visible From The Street Until Final Inspection.
INSPECTION RECORD
Footing
Foundation er4.Cr" 4 05G .I 7";, A ,
-i; -A• d.-'•
Underground Plumbing 7-4._0z y
r
Insulation
Rough Plumbing q- fg 1...-
Drywall
Chimney & Vent
Electric Final (by State -0z-64
Gas Piping
Final /2.4..o7/D —
Ekctric Rough (By State Ior)
Septic Final
Framing -, 3 -oZi (i •
(To include Roof in place and Windows
and Doors installed).
Notes:
ALL LISTED ITEMS MUST BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE COVERING -
WHETHER INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR, UNDERGROUND OR ABOVE GROUND.
THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE
Phone 384-5003 109 8th Street County Courthouse Glenwood Springs, Colorado.
APPROVEDDO NOT DESTROY THIS CARD
Date 1-11.- 01— By
IF PLACED OUTSIDE - COVER WITH CLEAR PLASTIC