No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication- PermitGARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING, SANITATION, and PLANNING DEPARTMENT 109 8th, Street, Suite 303 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601(970) 945-8212 Job Address I 1 (2I Nature of Work Bu i iding Permit Use of Building T Q n k -r l— Owner C r ;r5' ( hlAiki Contractor o `t' -C;d L. S`l J Li. i Amount of Parma U Date No. 8250 cliosi VUol (11(Ait_ Clerk Oil GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION q GARFIELD COUNI Y (GLENWOOD SPRINGS). COLORADO EF. LEP HO>.1 (970) 94S-8212 PERMIT NO INSPECTION LINE: (970)384-5003 PARC};I JSCHF•DUI F• NO. JOB ADDRESS, 4 4 F, as. 11 W y ECJ a ~'1 . 5 C p y (Do 1 LOT NO. BLOCK NO SUUDIVLSION!E.KF\PTION 2 Ill- CAL (A.`` --l6{ o ctL 19C150 [ . CO U 1607-- Tom` ()Z '-‘ n g 3runITILAITURSagbeke4-0-1-sr S CA_L.M CDslL,t '19 -c -z4161 .' ? 0314' PQ 4alavaAi .1 ] Aoot i Q101 c t,y, ,04`s t� ir94-C-07-1 LIC N.0 5 sp Fr ufaunaLu 1 1 FTI, SO n OF LT 6"-‘17 2k . . r.:*' t. ti. 6 L'a of a4TLMO , t 7 . N L3.:L 1 L dNcxP J+L S V 4. 8 MAXI OF 'goat kr. rA1Ifl + •AL1 ATico; rNOVE .ve 9 rw..ar vawaa. ou.Maur. cAfMMT ac.aai �xati 10 o ca)‘FVAY'DW11 W �IcN sn 11:E9'A(Ai M7'OGAr iFFP[1C1 T" ` ALVATlnl W WO" 1 —7 7 / C� 4! -- AAO3 iD }ALIATION f � F gW 6:0:7/. V ( r(O CJJ , - a i9car1 li {1 I L. D t (.11, '7-O , 6 'v (-1-Y S era f r4 (LLD 71 -10 -Cu G ++ c; u T 4,r i 7 A14 , PPrtovCO Ffnt 4LArt-NI S -STEN‘ + J SrALL[O A3 SET FOrz7 ( iF/ T{4E FF(VLc cc. OC fcrz C.roc.'c.' r A PrVrSIcr.I f, , A(--,0 a.I OCCL'F'4 bctES A SEPARATE COLORADO TMs PERMIT AUTHORIZED WORT: IS AFTER WORK 1 HERESY A7''OW 1}JE GOVERNING HEREIN AU THORITY LOCAL CONSTRUCT Signature /l NOTICE.. E) RY THE STATE OF ELECTRICAL. PERMR IS RtijUIRPU ANL) MIST III- ISSUE) BECOWffs NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION4 IS NOT COA_NCED WITHIN 180 DAYS. OR W CONS RUCTION OR O�4 SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FORA PERIOD OF I80 DAYS AT ANY TLNB, IS COMMENCED. CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED 11115 APPLICATION ANT) SAME TO BE TRUE. AND CORRECT ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BF. COMPLIED WITH WHETHER SPECLI-1E OR NOT THE CRANING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT PRE5UP 70 GIVE 'I0 VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR LAW ' r 1AITNG CONSTRUCTION OR THE PERFORMANCE -ION Pm 0 3 O d� PLAN CHECK FFR �A PERMrT FT's j �A/o • a>z• i 61. -rg . 1 A '[ • L' .. ' ti R.5".. eZ !'��+�`�1R.5". 1 OTAI• FEE DATE PERMIT ISSUED . .... nC I9. j 11 OCC. CROUPD —` 1 E-3CONST. TYPE. S Obt— I. I31E- V ..� a 7Yf i (' LOWING i/ / S . . ACKS ..... of ' matt„ auflonred advt he; .. aed ... • • • - no • P-� /, 41111 l-7 ` —� \. ''Ef,..1' , ;f1 OJ` _ _ T HOME ..i _. _ !! L NG14Dr NO & FEE: `Q. C C — • ._ Bulldog DeQa.Aj9taival9aze r __ . Plamp:TOFF- A fn , ,^ PERMI5510. 0THE APPUCANT.Zb.OWN R' DETAILED ON P1 ANS ` •SPF.CffYCAT1ON5 SLBMI1TED TO AND REV ACRtEE_NENT� R A - ;LCTOND!OR THE AGENT OF 11 W. CONTRACTOR OR OWNER 7O CONSTRUCT THE STRUCTURE AS WET) BY 11!>: BUILDING DFYARl7 ENl - IN CONSIDERATION OF THE ISSUJANCE OF TIPS PERMIT. THE SKVER HERESY AGRIFS IO COMPLY WTTII ALL BIJIIDING CODES AND LAND USE REGULATIONS ADOPTI-D BY GARFIF1D COUNTY PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY TY Ca1EN IN 30.2820I CRS AS AMENDED. THE SIGNER FURTHER ACRES T11AT IF THE ABOVE SAID ORDINANCES ARE NOT FULLY COMPLIED WITH IN THE. ]ACA•!ION. ERECTION. CONSTRUCTION AND I:SF OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED STRUCTURE, THE PERMIT MAY THEN BE REVOKTD BY NOTICE FROM 111E COUNTY ANI) THAI THF_N ANI) THERE IT SHALL BECOME NULL AND VOU) THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT BASED UPON FLANS, SPECIFICATIONS ANI) OTHER DATA SHAiJ- NOT PREVENT THE Bt.:TIDING OFFICIAL. FROM THEREAFTER REQUIRLNC THE CORRECTION OF ERRORS IN SAID PIANS. SPELIFICA11ONS AND OTHER DATA OR FRO PREVENTING BUILDING OPERATION BEING CARRIED ON THEREUNDER WHEN 1N VIOLATION OETHIS CODE OR ANY OTHER ORDINANCE OR RE(R,'LA11ON OF THIS rLRISD1Ct1ON THE REVIEW OF THE SUBMITTED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND INSPECTIONS CONDUCTED THEREAFTER DOES NOT CONSTRIJI-E AN ACCEPTANCE OF ANY RESPONSIBILITIES OR LIABILITIES 13Y GARFIELD COUNTY NOR ERRORS. OMISSIONS OR DISCREPANCIES. THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THESE ITEMS AND IMPLEMENTATION DURING CONSTRUCTION RESTS SPECIFICALLY WTIH THE ARCHITECT. DESIGNER BUDDER AND OWNER COMMENTS ARE INTENDED TO BE CONSERVATIVE AND L' SUPPORT OF THF. OWNERS INTEREST A Gerformoo3 1 HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAI 1 HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THEACAFE(.1:0-11151,L MENT ABOVE. j. ii a3 (4'9°- . I The following items are required by Garfield County for a final inspection: 1. A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector; 2. Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department posted where readily visible from access road; 3. A finished roof, a lockable house, complete exterior siding, exterior doors and windows installed, a complete kitchen with cabinets, a sink with hot & cold running water, non-absorbent kitchen floor coverings, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove and refrigerator, all necessary plumbing; 4. A complete bathroom, with washbowl, tub or shower, toilet stool, hot and cold running water, non-absorbent floors and walls finished and a privacy door; 5. All steps outside or inside over three (3) steps must have handrails, guard rails on balconies or decks over 30" high constructed to all 1994 UBC requirements; 6. Outside grading done to where water will detour away from the building; 7. Exceptions to the outside steps, decks and grading may be made upon the demonstration of extenuating circumstances, i.e. weather, but a Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until all the required items are completed and a final inspection made. A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. ****CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (C.O.) IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATING PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET. I understand and agree to abide by the above conditions for occupancy, use and the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the dwelling under building permit # • i1 Signature bpcont Date 1010 3/Of GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION GAR.FIELD COUNTY (GL NWOOD SPRINGS), COLORADO TELEPHONE (970) 945-$1212 PERMIT NO. INSPECnOR LINE (970)384-5003 PARCEIJSCIIEDUJLE NO. JOB ADDRESS. /ii_4 `] 4► L{ s H w 1 (e 2 / G 0 s a FIG 0 1 I LOT NO. BLOCK NO_ StTBDIVLSIONI: TION 3 [t7Ff11AC1T1P^ w "DURESS mg Uc Na 4 allcmiTF.CTINCITIZR \ f� IJ////////y j (Atik-- ADOlFi% pit Ur NO 5 OG K. FT OF R1AL� Il aQ FT OF LOT lg7CJlT W OT Mould 6 1:32.L9 or IMO 7 • oodmF aOsx OWL), J11G+rL- 6 i _lU l akAc 8 QA14 OF MALI: [IFFY OAOOI1U• CALTFIATTCH DHOW. DaEFRW[ 9 nMAPF. 7@OLL -D M/ casPoiT CI A1J =004.1113177 1 0 -. MLr47TrAY PEP NUT DON LOTT aFTVAC4 . . •. . SEPfi'! WIT PIAN VALuAlloN. • T ADIoa=F=VAWATI.. an 1 • cc/ex:Iota y , \ PelL4A1U-1‘ A SFPARATE FLECTRI COLORADO THIS PERMIT ALTHORL7FD WORK IS S USPENDED AITFR WORK IS 1 HEREBY CERTIFY KNOW THE SAME (3f)VERRTNG THIS HEREIN OR NOT. AUTHORITY 10 1.00AL LAW CONST RUCTION Signature of Oa orr. 0 Y. ! B V _ — Apploval:Date NOTICE ICE PERMIT IS REQLIREU AI*D MIST LIE 1SSUFD BY nil STATE. . CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION OR DAYS AT ANY TTs¢. APPLICATION AND OF LAWS HER SPECIFIED PRESUME. TO GIVE orHER STATE OR PERFORMANCE OF of N CHECKFF.k. PERMIT FEE: BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR IS NOT COImENCFD WITHIN Ito DAYS. OR IF OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 110 COMMENCED. THAT 1 HAVE. READ AND EXAMINED THIS TO BF. TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS TYPE OF WORK WILL BF. COMPLIED WITH WHETHER THE. GRASPING OF A PERMIT DOES MIT VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PROVISIONS OF ANY REGULATING CONSTRUCTTON OR THE TOTAL EUUk, DATE PERMIT ISSUED. OCC: GROUP: CONST TYPE ZONING: SETBACKS: — O a a having rad and tadenmod o III���VVV����ee SIAM i. HOME 15DS NO. & FEE.. Naming Der . ApprvviLD.ie ACiRFI.MENT PERMISSION 1S HEREBY (ANTED TO THE APPLICANT AS OWNER. CONTRACTOR ANT)'OR TILE. ACwNT OF THE CONTRACTOR OR OWNER TO CONSTRUCT THE STRUCILRF. AS DETAIL. ON PLANS AND SP1 CIF1CAT70NS SUBMITTED TO AND REVIEWED BY TILE BUDDING DEPARTMF.NT. IN CONSIDERATION OF THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT. THE SIGNER HEREBY AGREES TO COMPLY WTTLI ALL BUILDING CODES AND LAND USE REGULATIONS ADOPTED BY GARFIE D COUNTY PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GIVEN 04 30 21101 CRS AS AMENDED. THE SIGNTF.R FURTHER ACBCEES THAI IF TILE ABOVE SAID ORDINANCES ARE Nur FULLY COMPLIED WITH LNTHE LOCATION, ERECTION, CONSTRICTION AND USE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED STRUCTURE. T1IE PERMIT MAY THEN BE REVOKED BY NOTICE FROM THE COUNTY AND THAT THEN AND THERE 17 SHALL. BECOME NULL AND VOLL). THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT BASED UPON PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA SHALL NOT PREVENT THE BUUDTNG OFFICIAL FROM THEREAFT'FR REQUIRING TTI, CORRF.CTION OF ERRORS LN SAID PLANS. SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA OR FRO PREVENTING BUILDING OPERATION BEING CARRIED ON THEREUNDER WHEN IN VIOLATION OF THIS CODE OR ANY OTTER ORDINANCE OR REGULATION OF THIS JURISDICTION THEREVIEW OF THE SUBMITTED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND INSPECTIONS CONDUCTED THEREAFTER DOES NOT CONSTTFUTE AN ACCEPTANCE OF ANY R}SPONSI TLmES OR LIABILJnu BY GARFIEID COUNTY FOR ERRORS, OMISSIONS OR DISCREPANCIES THE P.ESPONSIBD.TTY FOR THESE rFEMS AND LUPLEMENTA110N DURING CONSTRUCTION RESTS SPECIFICALLY WI ni TEE ARCHITECT. DESKEER. BUILDER AND OWNER. COMMENTS ARE INTENDED TO BE CONSERVATIVE AND IN SUPPORT OF THE OWNTRS TNTFRFST. Garformoo3 1 ITFREBY ACKNOWff1Xi£ THAT 1 HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE. AGREEMENT ABOVE. (N1TIA ,l The following items are required by Garfield County for a final inspection: 1. A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector; 2. Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department posted where readily visible from access road; 3. A finished roof, a lockable house, complete exterior siding, exterior door's and ,windows installed, a complete kitchen with cabinets, a sink with hot & cold running water, non-absorbent kitchen floor coverings, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove and refrigerator, all necessary plumbing; 4. A complete bathroom, with washbowl, tub or shower, toilet stool, hot and cold running water, non-absorbent floors and walls finished and a privacy door; 5. All steps outside or inside over three (3) steps must have handrails, guard rails on balconies or decks over 30" high constructed to all 1994 UBC requirements; 6. Outside grading done to where water will detour away from the building; 7. Exceptions to the outside steps, decks and grading may be made upon the demonstration of extenuating circumstances, i.e. weather, but a Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until all the required items are completed and a final inspection made. A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. ****CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (C.O.) IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATING PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET. I understand and agree to abide by the above conditions for occupancy, use and the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the dwelling under building permit # • Signature bpcont Date Project Valuation: Church Type II -1 -hour $68.90 x 81= $55 81* Main level - 10938 x 55.81 = $610449.78 f, 1o'149. 7S Upper level - 747 x 55.81 = 41690.07 Slab on grade fdn - 10938 x 9.00 = 98442.00 Covered porch (new) - 336 x 24.00 = 8064.00 Sprinkler system - 11685 x 2.40 = 28044.00 Project valuation - = $' -141 685 ' j Building Permit Fee - $4102.75 � Plan Check Fee - $266.'9(co-r,--ect_ } Skb.l — $ 6 r?toci .5 y +�1.3.g.°6 rce,�,.- I i ng .sy *Although the building is classified as a Type V- 1 hour) -c.3.) ]S building, it more closely resembles Type II 1 hour construction. Therefore Type II-lhour was used for determining valuation. This represents a slight savings to Q the applicant. Type II -1 hour is valued at $.20 per square foot less than Type V -1 hour. # 2099 '.94 New Creation Church January 8,2003 Garfield City Building Department Attn: Andy Schwaller 108 8th Street, #201 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Re: New Creation Church Certificate of Occupancy Requirements Dear Mr. Schwaller, As per your request during inspection on 01/08/2003, we stipulate we will comply with all requirements by CDOT and Garfield County Code to complete the parking area and entry/exits to said parking and building. We will place three handicap signs for handicap parking as per plan, and install one stop sign at each exit as per requirement. All work to be complete after receiving requirementsCDOT and as weather permits. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Sincerely, Mark Bintliff President ti P.C) Box 1996 • Glenwood Sprirgs CO 816C2 • 970-945 5902 • nccg.nwd a rof net Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all reinforcing steel in accordance with the uniform building code or per stamped engineered design? Yes No Not necessary for this project 6. If the building is a pre-engineered structure, is there a stamped, signed engineered foundation plan for this building? Yes X No Not necessary for this project Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl spaces and the clearances required between wood and earth? Yes No Not necessary for project x Do the plans indicate the size and location of the ventilation openings for the attic, roof joist spaces and soffits? Yes No Not necessary for this project -X Do the plans include design Toads as required under the Uniform Building Code for roof snowloads, (a minimum of 40 pounds per square foot in Garfield County)? Yes . No Not necessary for this project 10. Do the plans include design loads as required for floor loads under the Uniform Building Code Section 2304 and Tables 23-A and 23-B? Yes X No Not necessary for this project 11. Does the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor and roof construction? Yes No Not necessary for this project 12. Is the wind speed and exposure design included in the plan? Yes x No Not necessary for this project 13. Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists, wall studs, ceilin joists, roof rafters or joists or trusses? Yes No Not necessary for this project 14 Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method of positive connection of all columns and beams? Yes x No Not necessary for this project 3 15. Does the plan indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the highest point of the building or addition measured at mid span between the ridge and the eave down to existing grade contours? Yes X No Not necessary for this project 16. Does the plan include any stove or zero clearance fireplace planned for installation including make and model and Colorado Phase II certifications or Phase II EPA certification? Yes No X. Not necessary for this project 17. Does the plan include a masonry fireplace including a fireplace section indicating design to comply with the Uniform Building Code Chapter 37? Yesr No Not necessary for this project 18. Does the pian include a window schedule or other verification that egress/rescue windows from sleeping rooms and/or basements comply with the requirements of the Uniform Building Code? Yes No Not necessary for this project 19. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that windows provide natur I ; ght and ventilation for all habitable rooms? Yes No Not necessary for this project 20. Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass doors, glazing immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as a walking surface, sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub enclosures and specify safety glazing for these areas? Yes ?<- ' No Not necessary for this project 21. Do the plans include a complete design for all mechanical systems planned for installation in this building? Yes No r Not necessary for this project 22 Have all areas in the building been accurately identified for the intended use? (Occupancy as idents ed in the Uniform Building Code Table 5-A) Yes No Not necessary for this project 23 Does the plan indicate the quantity, form, use and storage of any hazardous materials that may be in use in this building? Yes No Not necessary for this project 4 24 Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces, boilers and water heaters indicated on the pla 7 Yes No Not necessary for this project 25 Do the plans indicate the location and dimension of restroom facilities and if more than four employees and both sexes are employed, facilities for both sexes? Yes No Not necessary for this project 26. Do the plans indicate that restrooms and access to the building are handicapped accessible? Yes No Not necessary for this project 27 Have two (2) complete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the application? Yes N No Not necessary for this project 28 Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other construction code requirements? Yes X. No Not necessary for this project 29 Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a final inspection by the Garfield County Building Department? Yes X No 30. Do you understand that approval for design and/or construction changes are required prior to the implementation of these changes? Yes }K. No 3 I . Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a 'Plan Review" fee from you at the time of application and that you will be required to pay the "Permit" fee as well as any "Septic System" fees required, at the time you pick up your building permit? Yes V No 32. Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the Uniform Building Code including approval on a final inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy and occupancy of the building? Yes No 33. Are you aware that the person signing the Permit Application whether the "Owner", "Agent of the Owner", "General Contractor", "Contractor" or otherwise, signing the application is the party responsible for the project complying with the Uniform Codes? Yes 1 No _ 5 34. Are you aware that twenty-four (24) hour notice is required for all inspections? Inspections will be made from Battlement Mesa to West Glenwood in the mornings and from Glenwood Springs to Carbondale, in the afternoon. Morning inspections must be called in by 12:00 p.m. the day before; afternoon inspections must be called in by 4:00 p.m. the day before. Failure to give twenty-four (24) hour notice for inspections will delay your inspection one (I) day. Inspections are to be called in to 384-5003. fj 35 Are you aware that prior to issuance of a building permit you are required to show proof of a driveway access permit or obtain a statement from the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department stating one is not necessary? You can contact the Road & Bridge Department F25-8601. . Yes No 36 Do you understand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed Electrician and Plumber to perform installations and hookups? The license number will be required at time o .inspection Yes No 37 Are you aware, that on the front of the building permit application you will need to fill in the Parcel/ Schedule Number for the lot you are applying for this permit on prior to issuance of the uilding permit? Your attention in this is appreciated. Yes No I hereby acknowledge that I have read, understand, and answered these questions to the bast of my ability. k b tk Signature Phone. ciC (d ys), 676, % (evenings) Project Name. Project Address: 4416 i V S 1hW (ti-Zk Sv-c..Co EAS0 of 6 10) date 1 1/10/03 .0140 D Spa, c DEPAR11 Andy Schwaller Garfield County Building & Planning department 109 8th Street Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Dear Andv, On January 10, 2003, I did a finial inspection of the fire protection system and tire alarm system at the New Creation Church, 44761 liwy. 6 &24, Glenwood Springs CO. Roth systems passed there finial functional tests. the sprinkler contractor (H FI Fire Protection) needs to install signs on the sprinkler system control valves and put sign on exterior of door to sprinkler room. The contractor is in the process of getting a Knox box to install and put the building keys in. I have also ask the contractor to follow up on having a locking device installed 011 the sprinkler control room door to secure the sprinkler system controls from the general public. With the tire protection systems in place, tested and working the work on those systems is approved. Sincerely, Ronald L. Riggers Fire Protection Analyst Cilenwood Springs Fire Department I!>1 WEST MTLI STREET (_iLENWOOL) SPRINGS. COLORADO S1001 970-384-048(1 FAX 970-945-S506 J1 1 9-24-01 tifp" on spR14c 1 .� New Creation Church C/O Dana Yerian, Project manager -Daybreak Construction Dave Batten -Daybreak construction P.O. Box 582 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 RE: Further Sprinkler Clarification Dear Dara and Dave, (,oqih' copies The intent of this letter is to clarify the following questions regarding water supply, pump design. fire hydrant location, and hose stream connections for the New Creation Church sprinkler system. After inquiry from Mr Batten and Keith Gastfield with Excell Fire Protection. I conducted further research and made contact with other state fire agencies as well as the Fire Engineering Department with the University of Oklahoma. For your reference please find enclosed photocopies of Chapter 5, (Design Approaches), of NFPA 13 and information from the Uniform Fire Code applications manual which provides answers regarding Fire Flow requirements. The Glenwood Springs Fire District has adopted the 1994 Uniform Fire Code within Garfield County. It is the intent of this code to require a minimum of 1500 G.P.M. of water for manual fire fighting for all buildings regardless of floor area and includes sprinklercd occupancies. There is a provision within Table III -A however which allows the Fire Chief to modify the fire flow downward for isolated buildings in rural areas where development of full fire flow is impractical. This became the basis for our requirements for the Church suppression system as mentioned in my previous letter of September 8`h, 2001. Based upon what we have already established and taking into consideration that you have an assembly occupancy which is remote, containing an entire spectrum of population, and potential wildland urban interfact 1 make the following clarifications to the requirements. Water Supply NFPA 13 states that the minimum water supply requirement for a hydraulically designed occupancy is determined by adding the hose stcarn demand to the water supply for the sprinklers. During our discussion it was mentioned that an 8000 gallon tank is proposed. This appears to meet the potential amount required for a Tight hazard occupancy based upon a quick look at the area density curve in chapter 5, and the hose allowance duration stipulated within the document. However there are other considerations of design which may effect the amount of water supply 806 COOPER AVENUE GLENWOOD SPRINGS. COLORADO 81601 9701945-4942 FAX 970/945-6040 based upon the designers approach and any potential special design situation with the project. Pump Design The hose allowance and the sprinkler demand are coming from the same source for the system and the pump needs to be designed for both. Exception # 3 from article 5-2.3.1.1 (NFPA 13- 1996) is not applicable in this case. Paraphrasing from the book, Fire Protection Hydraulics and Water Supply Analysis (p243, Pat Brock -Author), ... The hose stream demand plus the sprinkler demand must be available at the residual pressure required by the sprinklers... This provides an extra safety factor in design and redundancy beyond the ability of the fire department pumper to also add pressure to the system. The standard makes no provision to recognize the arrival of fire- fighters with fire department pumping equipment. Hydrant Location NFPA 24 Private Fire Service Mains and their Appurtances, requires hydrants to be placed no closer than 40 feet from the buildings protected. This is about safety, giving the fire departemnt room to work especially when developing secondary water through tender shuttle operations at the scene free from the effects of radiant heat, collapse zones etc. All of the respondents 1 spoke with state that a wall hydrant is a last resort option and will not be accepted for this project. Hose Connection A 2 '''/" hose connection with National Standard Thread needs to be installed in a location of greatest advantage. In my dialogue with Mr. Batten on the proposed building layout, by placing this appliance on the North end of the building near the proposed F.D.C. location, it can be utilized toward the critical wildland exposure areas and still be able to reach most of the inside of the building and outside parking facility for manual firefighting. This connection provides us with added safety and system redundancy should damage to the hydrant occur or quick fire attack is needed. Again if you have further questions or need more information as we go through the process please feel free to contact myself or Chief Piper. Since ely/ Bill Harding, Battalion Chief CC: Mike Piper, Fire Chief Arno Ehlers, Chief Building Official -Garfield County Keith Gastficid, Excel Fire Protection 9-08-01 4 OEPARTt.÷ New Creation Church CIO Mr. Dana Ycrian, Project Manager -Daybreak Construction P.O Box 582 Glenwood Springs. Colorado 81602 Dear Dana, This letter incorporates general requirements for the fire suppression provision of the Uniform Fire Code as discussed at our meeting of 9-06-0I as it regards New Creation Church. In that meeting with Chief Piper and Dave Batten, we discussed the concept for compliance is to sprinkler the building, meeting the standards of NFPA 13 with an onsite water supply and tank system and, if applicable. a fire pump based on standards that arc stipulated within that same document. The desig. of thc sprinkler system must incorporate the following features. The water flow and tamper switches are required to be monitored through a central receiving station. This allows for early notification of Fire Department response to more effectively mitigate a fire event. • The system must be supplied with a Fire Department Connection, (FDC), as close to the building front as possible. The location of the FDC may he impacted by the actual location of the tank. The FDC allows us to connect to the building to boost water volume and pressure through the sprinkler system in order to suppress a fire of significant intensity. • A dry hydrant suction or wet hydrant dependant on design is required off of the tank. The nozzle end of the hydrant should have a 4 '/2" standard steamer thread connect. The hydrant location needs to be within 150 feet of the Fire Department Connection and no closer than 40 feet to the building. The hydrant enables the Fire Department to take water from thc tank and put the water through the fire department connection. • The system will require outside and inside hose allowance per the occupancy of greatest demand as determined in the standard. • Consideration for freezing must be taken into account with the design. Should the system incorporate domestic water with the required water supply for the sprinkler system then the system shall be designed such that the required fire supply will be available at all times. One of the advantages to tying the domestic into the system is the potential of circulating the water to offset the effects of corrosion through the system. The submitted plans shall bear the stamp ofa professional engineer who is licensed through the State of Colorado. Refer to the Glenwood Springs Fire Department Construction and Development Packet for plan submittal requirements and other related items. With these design features in place the department should be able to effectively mitigate a fire event 806 COOPER AVENUE GLENWOOD SPRINGS. COLORADO 81601 970/945-4942 FAX 970/945-6040 through early notification, quick connection of a water source via the hydrant, enabling us to support the sprinkler system through the Fire Department Connection and have enough water available until a secondary source of water supply can be established. These design features should meet compliance for the fire suppression provision of the Uniform Fire Code based upon the building concept that was presented at our meeting. Other applicable provisions of the fire code will or may apply based upon the construction type and occupancy classifications as determined by the building official of Garfield County during the plan review process. If you have questions or need further information please feel free to contact me or Chief Piper. Sincerely Bill Harding, Battalion Chief CC: Mike Piper, Fire Chief Arno Ehlers, Chief Building Official -Garfield County 1 12-02-99 Pastor Brian Roessler New Creation Church P.O. Box 1996 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81602 Dear Brian; As I stated in our recent phone conversation of Nov. 30th, I have contacted Garfield County Chief Building Official Don Owens in response to your request for a Christmas Party and Tom Kelly's proposal of an auto -body detail shop taking place at the old Boat Marina facility near Canyon Creek. After conversing with Mr.Owens it's apparent that the County needs to be brought into the communication loop with any of these types of proposals. It appears zoning allows for these uses but appropriate building code provisions and occupancy type should be evaluated. Due to the number and variety of requests that the Church has for the use of this building and property, the best approach is that the County be contacted first through the applicable permit process, then with the above evaluations done, the Fire Department can more effectively apply fire code requirements. As previously discussed, one of our major concerns with this complex, is water supply for fire fighting. At a minimum, for these buildings to have any kind of occupancy, the original water supply as required by the Fire Department for the Boat Marina needs to be reinstated and maintained. The suggestion to use an existing cistern is a possibility. Documentation as to cistern size and adaptations complying to our needs, shall be submitted to the fire department. This system will need to pass final testing before approval. In regards to the proposed Church Project it is my understanding that the County has approved it's Zoning. The "Change in Use" provision of the Uniform Building Code, and applicable Fire Code articles require the building to be sprinklered. If you have questions or need further information please feel free to contact Chief Piper or myself at our office. Sincerely �� �� _ • Bill HardingBattalion Chief) � Cc: Mike Piper (Fire Chief) Don Owens (Garfield County Chief Building Official) Mark Bean (Garfield County Planner) 806 COOPER AVENUE GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81601 970/945-4942 FAX 970/945-6040 ) `i Gienwo d Springs Rural Fir Protection District 0090 Mer -Rey Road Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Eeermin 611.02 i1 e i :, 3 40)'0w-14, to our t!::L:=1:.r avCL r'r . e7rer 2r at .c'�r neN G ,'dcck 4ac- i 1+. a`. Carl on G:".: e•' e _ metnod o r~eet ihy .:1e requirements;cr.:. e: tt.e • . _ a. _. 1 1 _ •ter' i open. ',"Pur -.•r • ri!' _ __ to be .teen• _ . 1 .. ...... :c' _ILera:.Cri the 'ree: in; pnotlem in winter. `'e 7'av i e ::r ▪ nazuired isr $.ac i • t:/ l5 2f,�.00 ;di it,.^S. Thi 5 Uc17:•I:r i_.cl �..:'IC 7eet 4cr' Cine building ar.•] .:.. i:a:c" =i r_ ::I..rt -rsn +.. .^.=i. .231. Le:SUSe ti'_.E..ne F'rL-::ing a pon.:, '.,err z.nou.: r• .r I: am:ent Ct w5"er. ti .. irr .nt ar. a r,f^_a• tmer.i 1�r•7 Lri �'_- += re':dU Fr:,:. Be cu: i at }"dE ::.: iE Ir••-- - hot rcre . i• v-1� 'e''. 4rom ei Se ...•U Vii.y an: tat c_L"__ tc ..%YAH nee: to see Citi_ I riper GIJ ,y • _"I -.,v the 'J _ .: + .. . 1. •_ _ 1 [ .• l �I� .. Jr an c _ L: = 12rl I : n . _ r :: _ � ~' 1 5 1 1 _ r1 _ ❑ � _ r. � a h .J. _ . _ _ _ - _ C . . 7 r mo i • r: _ • . ' i. e _ : .. - . • : X1:7 = .. l'- c :.r• _ :I r- 3 C7 3:n D) 0 w• 'L3 c+ N Cu 0? tp cr fn •-'c+X 0•`w • •• V • 0 CO - 1 VI Co • 3 a-^ ) V O ▪ f• A •• f - we12EY❑ lue1pSH fi v ,J r � � i •[1 r ro fh h puod not;aa3oad a -'T '0C)C) -p' 0 r+ .j'. F--• (D ft) 0 7 ,0 '1 •-• ON Cu o "S oNa,o x 00aE l< o c)o fn 0 .ti CT1-1 0 r• 011 N F•r NfN 0 r• s cD O c'* O 0 1 c f (D ID 7� (D t=J • x N r• r 0 '0 (1) a 0 0 Ea.ze SSB3ZV v V 3 o O 0. Cr‘ N 11 • 0, O � � M H• n (n O (J) O al N C) O 'i 1 I-'• • co - i< 'TJ O 0 (D lnoRBZ a�1S a wtxo.zddy Sjais ENGINEERING LLC q�a Water System For New Creation Church of Glenwood Prepared for: New Creation Church 206 Center Drive Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Prepare by: Sopris Engineering, LLC 502 Main Street, A3 Carbo >,: i '" i 01 3 w � n tiii � ►-0 March, 2000 SE Job No. 98010.01 Sf17 Wain Ctroof • ciiilw Al • P(1 O.F.'+, r November 8, 2001 Pastor Mark Bintliff New Creation Church 206 Center Drive Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 RE: Individual Sewage Disposal System (ISDS) and Water Distribution System for Phase 1 of the New Creation Church Development. SE Job No. 98010.01 Dear: Mark: Attached herewith is a report of our findings and includes a design for the subject site improvements. The design is based on engineering evaluations pertaining to the phased redevelopment and new development associated with this project. We have utilized a report from Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. (HP ) date November 23, 1999 Job No. 198 152 — 1, a report from Zancanella and Associates dated July 24, 1998, and the proposed site plan from Ernest C. Delto, Architect which includes survey information from Richard L. Holsan. Our attached proposed Site plan, (Exhibit A) water and ISDS design incorporates pertinent features from the above referenced sources. Site Location The Site is located in Section 35, T 5 S., R 90 W. of the 6`h P.M. at 44761 U.S. Highway 6, Garfield County, Colorado. The subject site is located approximately 500 feet north of the Colorado River and approximately % mile west of Canyon Creek. The site is bordered on the south by U.S. Highway 6 and the northwest by County Road 335. Latitude is 39 deg 34' 19" and Longitude 107 deg. 27' 32" Project Overview The project consists of two phases in the development of the New Creation Church. Phase I includes the construction of a main church facility near the existing westernly building A to be demolished. An ISDS system will be constructed for the peak usage of this facility only. A new Transient, non -community water system will be installed to serve the peak requirements of the Phase I development as well as phase II. Phase II includes the remodel construction of a school/daycare facility incorporating the existing building B. A separate ISDS system will be designed and installed to accommodate this facility. A water treatment and distribution system will be constructed to provide potable water to the phase I facility. An expanded water system distribution system will be constructed to serve the needs of the phase II facility. This water system will then be classified as a non -transient, non -community water system. Alternatives Considered The conceptual design for water and sewer improvements have been ongoing for three years. The initial conceptual plan involved connecting water and sewer services to the Canyon Creek Estates system located approximately one mile to the east adjacent to Canyon Creek. This existing water and sewer system currently serves the subdivision with 59 lots online. 502 Main Street • Suite A3 • Carbondale, CO 81623. • (970) 704-0311 • Fax (970) 704-0313 SOPRIS ENGINEERING • LLC civil consultants Pastor Mark Bintliff SE Job No. 98010.01 November 8, 2001 Page 2 The Average daily water use for the subdivision is 23,450 gallons per day with a maximum of 50,000 gallons of storage. In order to utilize the water system the church would be required to share the cost to provide for an upgrade to accommodate the subdivisions ultimate build out as well as accommodating the required additional storage for fire flow and in house needs at the church. The increased cost of providing treatment, distribution and storage for approximately 102,000 gallons is cost prohibitive. The distribution line would run approximately 5000 feet and include a watercourse crossing. The total additional cost between constructing an onsite system versus utilizing the off site system is approximately $ 160,000. The current average daily wastewater flows for the Canyon Creek subdivision is 16,000 gallons per day with a maximum plant capacity of 21,000 gallons per day. It has been determined that the wastewater treatment plant at Canyon Creek has the capacity to treat the additional wastewater from the church, however the plant needs some maintenance work. Zancanella and Associates estimated the cost to the church at $12,000. The increased cost of providing treatment plant maintenance, distribution and lift stations is cost prohibitive. The Sewer line would run approximately 5000 feet, include a water course crossing and lift station. The total additional cost between constructing an onsite ISDS system versus utilizing the off site wastewater treatment plant system is approximately $175,000. The total additional cost between constructing onsite water and ISDS system versus utilizing the off site systems is approximately $335,000. Due to economic constraints scheduling and legal agreements a decision has been made to forego connection to the off site water and sewer systems and construct the proposed water and ISDS systems presented in this report. However the church will retain the option to connect to a future regional water and sewer facilities if the engineering and economic realities are favorable. ISDS System Wastewater from Building A will discharge to a series of septic tanks. Effluent will discharge out of the secondary tank by use of a metered dosing siphon. The dosing assembly will gravity discharge effluent to a hydro splitter device for discharge through 6 individual lines which will distribute the effluent to the absorption fields located along the southern property boundary on the site. Wastewater from Building A will flow to a 2500 gallon septic tank and one 1000 gallon septic tankidosing tank connected in series. We have designed the system to allow for dosing which would discharge evenly over two separate fields. Based upon soils reports and Garfield county requirements we have calculated the absorption field areas for Building A to be 1108 square feet each. The total calculated volume of required septic tank volume is 2375 gallons and the peak dosing volume is 500 gallons. We recommend a dosing siphon to control the dosing volume of approximately 500 gallons to insure adequate saturation of the fields during a dosing cycle and allow for a rest period. Pastor Mark Bintliff SE Job No. 98010.01 November 8, 200I Page 3 Existing Site Conditions: The 5.8 -acre site was previously occupied by a boat and recreational vehicle storage and maintenance facility. A one story pre -fabricated steel structure and a one story wood frame over a walkout basement/garage exist near the southwest and southeast corners of the site respectively. A shallow pond is located near the east central portion of the site. The ground surface is relatively flat in the southern portion of the site and continues with a moderate grade up to the northern most point on the site. The overall slope is slight to moderate with decreasing grade from north to south. Approximately 35 to 40 feet of elevation difference exist across the site. Vegetation typically consists of grass and weeds. The southern portion of the site is covered with gravel and road base along with two existing structures and large concrete slabs. The southern portion of the site where the proposed absorption fields will be located consist of disturbed pasture grasses that have been irrigated in the past with slopes Less than 10%. The existing sub surface materials at the proposed ISDS location consist of native materials. Proposed Site Condition: The existing Building A will be demolished and a new church facility building will be constructed with associated parking and driveways. The project phase 1 intends to serve a maximum of 475 people at the 450 seat church facilities for Sunday service. Water will be supplied by an existing well in the south portion of the property and is shown on the attached site plan. We have based our design on a peak day, design flow of 5 gallons per day per person to accommodate a maximum of 475 persons on the peak day once a week. The attached Water Usage Demand Requirements table (Exhibit B) delineates peak day and average water requirements for Phase 1 and 2 incorporated into the design. A 20% allowable reduction has been applied to the design flow for water conserving fixtures. All plumbing fixtures in the proposed facility will utilize permanently installed water conserving devices. Subsurface Conditions: Attached herewith are the results of the subsurface investigation and percolation tests conducted by Hepworth Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. (RP) dated October 22, 1997 Job No. 197 490 (See Exhibit C). The subsoil encountered at the site consists of 0 - 5 feet of fill overlying sand and silt. Silty sandy gravels containing cobbles and possible boulders was encountered at depths between 5 and 1.6 feet. The ground water was not encountered at the time of the investigation and is not expected to be encountered at a depth, which may influence the design of the proposed absorption system. The absorption rate of the soils on site was measured to be 28 to 45 minutes per inch with an average of 34 minutes per inch. We recommend using 34 minutes per inch for design purposes. The system will be installed in natural soils below any fill encountered. Pastor Mark Bintliff SE Job No. 98010.01 November 8, 2001 Page 4 System Design: A site plan is provided to detail the various components of the proposed sewage disposal system. Please note that the size of the proposed leach field system is based on Garfield County's peak flow per person per estimated institutional usage rates. Pursuant to a pre submittal conversation with Dyain Watson of the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE) the peak day design flow of waste water has been established by utilizing the daily flow per person based on the number of seats in the in facility. The maximum number of people expected to utilize the facility on the peak day is 450. For conservative design 475 people is used in calculating the design flow. Dyain Waston has agreed that the 20% reduction for utilizing water conserving devices is appropriate for this application. The following panes detail the technical criteria utilized in design of the proposed system. We recommend using a conventional absorption bed system without an area reduction. Desjgn Criteria: The proposed system is designed to serve a church facility containing 450 seats or 475 people maximum per peak day once a week. The design flows are calculated as follows Institutional use — peak day per person usage = 475 persons. Daily Flow (Qda) = # of people X 5 gal/person/day Qda =475X5=2375gpd Design Flow (Qd) = Qda X (0.80) gallons/person/peak day Based on permanently installed water conservation devices, allowable 20% reduction. Qd = 2375 gpd X (0.80) = 1900 gpd Septic Tank Design: Volume (v) of tank = Design flow (Qd) * 1.25 (30 hour retention) V = 1900 X 1.25 = 2375 gallons A 2500 -gallon septic and a 1000 gallon double compartment septic/dosing tank will be installed. The tanks will be installed and operate in series. The first tank will hold the solids and insure adequate detention time of the effluent. The outlet of this tank will incorporate a maintainable effluent filter to collect any suspended solids that may be present in the effluent. The second double compartment tank will store the dosing volumes. The second double compartment septic/dosing tank will accommodate the dosing siphon system to be installed in the secondary chamber of the second tank. This system will gravity discharge primary treated effluent to a hydro -splitter device for discharge to the absorption fields. Pastor Mark Bintliff SE Job No. 98010.01 November 8, 2001 Page 5 Percolation Test Results As mentioned above, the soils on the site are adequate to provide effective percolation within normal ranges. However, additional sub surface soil investigations will be performed, by the engineer, in the final staked out Iocation of the absorption field to confirm assumption utilized in the design. Absorption Field Disposal System Design: Average percolation rate is 34 minutes per inch A (SF) = (Qd)/5 X (t)1/2: where A = area, Qd = (gaVpeak day) (t)tr = square root of time of absorption rate (min/inch) This design will give a recommended minimum absorption field area: A = 1900/5 X (34)1/' = 2215 sq. feet Distribute dosing over two fields Area each field = 2215 1 2 = 1 108 sq. feet Use two separate 18 x 69 foot fields (1152 SF) with equal distribution dosing approximately 4 times per day. The system will provide gravity dosing to the fields through individual distribution lines from a distribution manifold located in a Large distribution box. The effluent will gravity flow to separate headers connected to each pair of rows in the absorption fields. We recommend that an Orenco Systems Inc., 8" FT -series Biotube effluent filter be installed in the outlet of the first septic tank. Dosing Tank The second septic/dosing tank in series will be a double compartment tank that will store the closing volumes and accommodate the dosing siphon system. This system will incorporate a float switch connected to a dosing counter to monitor wastewater flows. We recommend that an Orenco Systems Inc., 3" dosing siphon be installed. Use a model OSI-3-I8BF. The system will be monitored for performance and incorporate a flow meter counter which will record dosing events. Distribution System We recommend installing an Orenco Systems Inc.; Hydrosplitter housed in a 24" distribution box riser vault. Use a model HSA 200-06-10 Hydrosplitter. Biotube pump vault system or equivalent in the secondary compartment of the septic/dosing tank. The systems have easy access and maintenance design and are well suited for this commercial application. Pastor Mark BintIiff SE Job No. 98010.01 November 8, 2001 Page 6 Site Improvement Layout: With respect to the current conditions, all septic tanks and sewage lines must be watertight. A peak dosing volume of 500 gallons will most likely be required due to the peak day design flow. The equal dosing to the separate fields will allow for better treatment and recovery within the absorption beds. The hydro splitter will ensure equal distribution to the field. The dosing/septic tank will be gravity fed from the first (2500 gallon) septic tank. The septic tanks must be watertight therefore, it is recommended to install one piece tank units or factory sealed two piece units to prevent seepage out of the tanks. If the tank pieces have to be joined in the field extra care shall be used to insure watertight seams. A pressure test is required to insure maximum resistance to infiltration. Technical specifications for the construction of the waste water pipes are contained in Exhibit D. General Notes: 1) All materials and installation practices shall conform to the Garfield County ISDS regulations. 2) All sewer lines in the system shall be schedule 40 or SDR 35 PVC unless specified otherwise on the plan. 3) The contractor shall ensure that the concrete septic tank and sewer lines are completely watertight. 4) The absorption fields shall be planted (sod or mulch seeding) with suitable vegetation cover. 5) Install a two-way clean out on the service line from the church facility. 6) The bed areas must be protected to prevent damage from vehicular or livestock traffic and must be crowned to divert drainage away from the beds. 7) The Engineer shall be notified to inspect the system during construction prior to the backfilling of any components of the system and perform a final as -built inspection of the entire system. Our design and recommendations are based upon data supplied to us by others. If subsurface or site conditions are found to different from these described in this report, we should be notified to evaluate the effect it may have on the proposed ISDS. If the County Environmental Health Department requests changes or modifications to this design, we should be contacted to evaluate the effect on the ISDS. Pastor Mark Bintliff SE Job No. 98010.01 November 8, 2001 Page 7 Water System The water system will incorporate installation of new distribution, storage and treatment systems. Technical specifications for the construction of the water mains are contained in Exhibit D. The existing well has sufficient capacity (24 gpm) to easily meet the needs of the church. See Exhibit E and F for physical and legal information regarding the existing well. On site storage will be required to meet fire flow requirements using a system separate from the potable water system. Water treatment will be required for in-house/potable water. Disinfection of potable water is required and we propose the use of chlorine with a linear contact chamber consisting of approximately 100 feet of I2" DIP. Standard 2" corporation stop taps will be installed on either end of the 12" pipeline. In addition a reverse osmosis system will be utilized to supply drinking water fixtures within the church facility at selected locations. Potable Water System The water will be supplied by an existing well located an the southern portion of the property east of the old dairy building. Water wilI be routed through a water treatment and control building adjacent to the well. The well water will be metered, treated and pressurized through pressure tanks for distribution through 100 L.F. of 12" DIP. Treatment will consist of sand separation and/or filtration with chemical disinfection. The chlorine contact time of 30 minutes is achieved by storage in the pressure tanks and the 12" DIP installed in the distribution main trench. A 2" class 200 polyethylene water main will be installed along the southern driveway on site from the treatment and control building to the church facility. The distribution system will supply water for domestic use in the church facility only. A separate water supply and distribution system will be installed for fire protection. An additional curb stop for a 2" water service and a stub out line will be installed to serve the Phase II "Building B". Additional 2" water main may be installed as required to extend service for Phase 11 useage. See Attachments 2 and 5 for physical and legal information regarding the proposed water system. Pressure Tank Storaee The potable water system will utilize (4) 25 -gallon pressure tanks to store pressurized water for in house use only. The tanks will be housed in the proposed water treatment and control building and will be installed in parallel with means for isolation. The tanks will serve to provide partial chlorine contact time detention storage. The tanks will be installed with isolation ball valves and quick connect fittings. A pressure switch will control the well pump. An appropriate pressure gage will be installed. The system will limit pressure to below I00 psi with an operating range between 35 and 60 psi. The tanks shall be installed in accordance with the State of Colorado, Design Criteria for Potable Water Systems and AWWA standards. Shop drawings and specifications shall be submitted to the engineer for approval. Other accessories may be required by the Water Control Division. Water Treatment and Control Building The Water Treatment and Control Building shall be constructed in accordance with all applicable State and Local building codes. All applicable building and treatment components shall be installed for compliance as a water treatment facility per State of Colorado, Design Criteria for Potable Water Systems. The building will house liquid chlorine storage containers with a chemical feed pump and appropriate sampling Pastor Mark Bintliff SE Job No. 98010.01 November 8, 2001 Page 8 ports. The system will include an above around water supply line inspection loop with a boiler air release valve, a 3/." water meter, pressure gage, and a sand separator/filter device. High and low pressure alarms shall be installed along with a low chorine alarm. All controls and components of the system to be housed in the insulated heated and vented building. The building to be wired for 120 volts, 40 amps single-phase electrical service for equipment. Disinfection The potable water system will utilize chlorine contact volume installed on the distribution system. Chlorine will be applied into the water supply inspection loop on the supply end prior to the sand separator device. The sand separator unit will provide a means for adequately mixing the chlorine. The system will include two liquid chlorine chemical storage containers, a chemical feed pump, disinfectant injection port, 3/." hose bib, controls, sampling ports, testing equipment and supplies. Other accessories such as chlorine level monitors and alarm should be incorporated into this system. The chlorine application system shall be designed to provide for a residual chlorine concentration of 2 mg/L. The volume required for minimum chlorine contact time of 30 minutes is 720 gallons. The required Volume is based on the well's sustained production yield of 24 gallons per minute. This volume is adequate to treat the water for the proposed in- house uses. It is noted that the water is aesthetically not intended for potable consumption with out additional treatment through Reverse osmosis systems in the building. Approximately 100 gallons of Chlorine contact volume is provided in the pressure tanks. The additional 620 gallons required is provided in approximately 100 feet of 12" ductile iron pipeline installed along the approximate 330 foot distribution run from the Treatment and control building to the church facility. Some additional volume exists in the 2" polyethylene water distribution main. The chlorinated water from the distribution piping in the treatment building inters the 12" diameter linear contact pipe chamber through a corporation stop service connection on the supply end. The detained water will exit the enlarged pipeline on the distribution end through a corporation stop service connection and continues through the 2" polyethylene water distribution main to the church facility. 100 Year Flood Plain The site does not lie in a flood plain. The approximate range in elevations in the Colorado River flood plain south of the site is 5608 to 5612 feet above MSL. The low end of the site is approximately 30 feet above the 100 -year flood elevation. See Attachment 4 for detailed flood plain information. Water Quality A water sample from the water supply source, the Dairy Basement well, was collected and analyzed in May of 1998. An additional sample was collected and analyzed in February of 2000. The lab results from the two sampling events present similar concentrations of constituents contained in the well's water. The parameters tested indicate a naturally soft, alkaline water with relatively high concentrations of sodium, chloride and bicarbonate which constitutes the majority of the total dissolved solids. Sodium, Chloride and TDS exceed the maximum containment levels (MCL) for drinking water however they are all secondary parameters that are not enforceable by the CDPHE. It is recommended that drinking water be treated for limited usage at selected locations only. All primary parameter test results indicated concentrations below drinking water standard MCL's. The concentration of fluoride is elevated but is below the limit. The Pastor Mark Bintliff SE Job No. 98010.01 November 8, 2001 Page 9 Bacteriological test indicated zero colonies of coliform. The turbidity at the time of sampling was slightly high, however we do not anticipate any adverse effects associated with the chemical or mechanical treatment of the water. It is noted that the sample was collected in conduction with a well aquifer pump test after an extended period of well in activity. We anticipate that any elevated levels of suspended solids will only be present during maximum pumping demands and will be filtered out by the sand separator device prior to distribution. An additional filtration cartridge system may be incorporated however is not recommended at this time. Other parameters tested are within acceptable ranges precluding the need for additional treatment. See Attachment 6 for detailed water analysis information. Water Treatment Water treatment shall consist of chlorination as mentioned above and reverse osmosis (RO) to treat and store limited amounts of drinking water only. The RO water would be distributed via separate supply lines to fixtures at select locations within the building. No other treatment processes are anticipated at this time. R.O. System The R.O. system will be a central unit that will include the RO Filters with automatic pre and post treatment controls, and associated plumbing. A 37 -gallon pressure tank will store treated water for distribution to the selected fixtures. The system is estimated to process approximately 125 gallons per day. A primary drinking water fixture will be installed next to the kitchen sink. If desirable additional small gooseneck fixtures may be installed in the primary public rest rooms for limited use drinking only. If more dedicated drinking water is desired or needed for peak day use, an additional pressure storage tank can be installed. The recommended system is a Culligan B-1 L plus or approved equal. Water Quality Monitoring The management of the system shall include a periodic water quality monitoring program. The program shall have a schedule to collect water samples from designated sampling points for testing of specific parameters as required for transient, non -community public water systems. The Water Control Division will establish the monitoring frequency during the compliance period and allow for waivers when test results indicate a waiver is appropriate. The parameters that must be monitored for this system include but are not limited to bacteriological, nitrate and nitrite. Phase two of the project, when the day care/school facility is constructed, will change the system to a Non transient, non -community water system, and will require additional parameters to be tested. When a treatment process will effect the corrositivity of the system's potable water, a lead and copper assessment must be completed. The independent R.O. distribution system shall utilize appropriate plastic pipes. Fire Protection Water System The fire protection storage tank (10,000 gallons) location will only provide approximately 8 -psi water pressure to Building A. A 4" DIP water pipeline will be installed from the tank will supply stored water to the fire suppression system. A fire booster pump will be installed as required to provide adequate pressure to the proposed building for sprinkler requirements. A separate 4" DIP water pipeline will be installed • 44 Pastor Mark Bintliff SE Job No. 98010.01 November 8, 2001 Page 10 from the tank to supply stored water to a standard fire hydrant located at least 40 feet from the proposed building. A minimum storage volume of 8,000 gallons is required for inside/outside hose allowance demand and volume required for the sprinkler system. This is based on the amount required for light hazard occupancy. Additional storage is required for the fire hydrant for a total storage volume of 10,000 gallons. The system will include a Fire Department Connection, (FDC), installed near the north end of the building. The FDC allows the Fire Department to connect to the building to boost water volume and pressure through the sprinkler system in order to suppress a fire of significant intensity. A 2 %_" hose connection with national standard threads will be installed near the FDC to be utilized for manual fire fighting inside and outside of the building. This connection will provide safety and system redundancy if damage to fire hydrant occurs or quick fire attack is needed. A wet hydrant will be installed with a 4 '/2" standard steamer thread connect. The hydrant may be used to take water from the tank and put the water through the fire department connection. All fire protection system shall be operated and installed in accordance with the 1994 Uniform Fire Code. Fire Water Supply The water supply source for Fire Protection water and possible irrigation needs will be provided by an existing well located just east of the site. The well is reported to be currently in service and provides similar water quantity and quality as the Dairy Basement Well proposed as the potable water supply well. And existing water supply line exists and runs through the site. The line will be located and evaluated. A portion of the line may be used if adequate or replaced. This well may also provide irrigation water supply. Water Storage Tank The water storage tank should be installed in the location shown on the plan at the highest elevation feasible on the site. The tank will be buried or partially buried and covered. The storage volume in the tank has been calculated to provide the required fire flow of 10,000 gallons. The tank shall be constructed per AWWA standards. Shop drawings and specifications shall be submitted to the engineer for approval. The tank shall be vented to prevent differential internal and external pressures. The tank shall be equipped with an inlet riser to deliver fresh well water near the top of the tank to promote mixing. The water supply line to the tank shall be equipped with a float valve or other type of automatic valve to allow the tank to fill on demand. Low and high water alarms shall be installed to notify responsible parties of system failures. Tank shall be installed in accordance with the manufacture specifications. Other accessories may be required with the tank installation by the Water Control Division. Storaze Tank Foundation The tank shall be supported and backfilled with structural compacted granular material. Excavation, soil preparation and compaction shall conform to accepted Engineering practice for the bearing pressures Pastor Mark Bintliff SE Job No. 98010.01 November 8, 2001 Page 11 predicted. Site grading around the tank shall provide for positive drainage away from the tank. The backfill and foundation specifications shall be coordinated with a geo technical engineer and the manufacture recommendations. Inlet / outlet pipe and foundation depths shall be designed for appropriate frost protection. )<rritzation system Several options exist for providing irrigation water to the property. The well pump in the fire water supply well may be utilized to supply pressure for irrigation purposes or to fill a reservoir. A by pass valve, distribution pipes and yard hydrants may be installed at the potable supply well head and/or at the water treatment and control building to provide for irrigation needs independent of potable distribution system. The fire water storage tank water could be utilized for irrigation purposes if withdraw rates are lower than the re -supply rate. If ditch water is utilized in an irrigation system then provisions shall be made to prevent any cross connection with the potable water system. If you have any questions or need any additional information, please call. Sincerely, Paul Itt leiT4:f:► .;4, De�a. 2L� ti i ifs : y, , 'RLP•• ���• Projea' i'giir'eer; ti's``` •F,, w 2-17-02 Arno Ehlers, Chief Building Official Garfield County Building and Planing 109 8' Street, Suite 303 .0$OOD gpR,� 0EPARt Re: Fire Department Comments on Site Plan Submittal, New Creation Church Dear Arno, As we have discussed 1 had previously met with Dana Yerian of Daybreak Construction to look over the sewer and water plan dated 11/08/01 along with a letter stamped by Yancy Nichol, Professional Engineer. At this juncture 1 have not received plans for the sprinkler system itself which needs to meet the requirements mentioned in earlier correspondences provided to Mr Yerian and copied courtesy to you. [offer the following comments towards this review. Access Access as depicted on the site plan meets compliance to Section 902 of the Uniform Fire Code. There are three points of entry allowing the Fire Department to get to all exterior points of the building easily. The fire hydrant is in a good location for easy access, is near the fire department connection and provides us with enough distance for firefighter safety. Water Tank for Fire Suppression A 10,000 gallon underground tank is being installed to supply the fire suppression system The church is considered to be a Tight hazard occupancy per NFPA 13. Dana has shown me documentation from various fire suppression system installers estimating 8000 to 9000 gallons as meeting design compliance for sprinkler and hose requirements within NFPA 13 for this project. Underground Piping used for Fire Protection Supply Lines In addition to the plan notes regarding the water main stipulated within the plans, the main needs to comply with the enclosed section of Code of Colorado Regulation 8 CCR 1507- I I. Essentially the line nerds to be installed, tested, flushed and inspected in accordance with NFPA Standard 24, Private Fire Service Mains and their Appurtenances. A completed copy of the Contractors Material and Test Certificate for Underground Piping needs to be provided to the Department prior to final hookup to the fire suppression system. Existing Building B The existing building footprint on the plans states that a proposed daycare is intended for phase II of the project. In my conversation with you and Dana we noted that this potentially constitutes a change of use and fire protection would need to be designed with this building when phase 11 occurs. We appreciate the efforts the Church, Mr Yerian and Sopris Engineering have conducted with this project so far. If you need further information or have questions please feel free to contact me or Chief Piper. Since ely Bill Harding, Battalion Chief ti;OC`.VilcF Piper, Firc Chief Yerian, Daybreak Construction s;; Yancy Nichol P.E., Sopris Engineering 1 806 COOPER AVENUE GLENWOOD SPRINGS. COLORADO 81601 970/945-4942 FAX 970/945-6040 f • !begs 10 5.6.3 A signed letter on the registered contractor's letterhead explaining the scope of work, start and completion dates, and a statement that tenant finish, remodel, or additions do not affect the hydraulic demand design or integrity of the existing fire proton system is also required for submittal to the authority having jurisdiction. 5.6.4 If it Is ilkely that the hydraulic design or integrity of the existing fire protection system has been affected by the scope of work, or if the owner, contractor, or authority having jton has concerns about the system integrity, a NICET Level III or above review shall be required. 5.7 Underground Piping used for Fire Proton Supply Lines 5.7.1 The underground supply line installed between the public water main and the fire protection system riser must be installed in accordance with NFPA Standard 24, Private Fire Service Mains and Their Appurtenances. 5.72 All underground supply fines shall be installed by stent contractors and shall be inspected by qualified inspectors. A copy of the 'Contractor's Material and Test Certificate for Underground . Piping' must be completed and provided the owner and certified fire suppression system inspector by the contractor. 5.8 Additional Conditions 5.8.1 Flow test on water supply systems must be less than one year okt, unless approved by the cerithed fire suppression system inspector having jurisdiction. 5.82 When calculating ating water supply requirements, deduct ten (10) percent from the flow test. Show the actual flow and reduction on hydrae c calculation sheets. 5.9 Exemptions. The following projects are exempted from plan submittal, inspection, and approval requirements: 5.9.1 Pre-engineered range hoods and duct extinguishing systems. 5.92 Any work described in this Section 5 that is conducted at any facility owned and operated by a mining company. 8 CCR 1507-11 THE CODE OF ent nxu.nn sari n arnhsc 151,nilrnn4 13:10 Mssesaccs • lamely 2, 2002 L. L./ .11% [J`R7 it .[.1�7 r rwaL ua Ernest Kollar &mincers. Inc =trial. SL. Salle 203 Calboeaak CO 11423 Mae p %3.3213 Fu 07 11) %3339S aureole! County Building Dept_ 109 16,1303 Glenwood springs, CO 81601 Re: New c:esticr,fcam To Whose It May Canna: The 000eretc floor was designed to support a Boor live Toad of 100 psf Should you have any questions, please call `�'a' s ,s.„ 140A., EMI* Kollar. PE /-02-01 Corporate Office 18933 Aldine Westfield Houston, Texas 77073 Tel (281) 443-9065 Fax (281) 443-9064 Toll Free (888) 467-4443 September 14, 2001 RIGID BUILDING SYSTEMS JOB NO ' 21135 CUSTOMER: NEW CREATION CHURCH ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 1996 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81602 END-USER: NEW CREATION CHURCH JOBSITE: HIGHWAY 6 CANYON CREEK NEW CASTLE, CO 81602 COUNTY: GARFIELD BUILDING END-USE: CHURCH BUILDING "A" RF Span Length 61'-0' BUILDING "B" RF Eave Slope 6 10 Inverness Drive East Suite 101 Englewood, CO 80111 Tel (303) 799-4579 Fax (303) 799-4803 Toll Free (800) 658-2885 Bays 16'-0' 4:12 21'-4', 16'-9", 16-8", 17'-3', 24'-0' 1 Span Length Eave Slope Bays 56'-0' 48'-0' 16%0' 4:12 2 @ 24'-0' BUILDING "C" RF i Span Length Eave Slope Bays 40'-0" 60'-0' 15'-0' 4:12 3 ( 20'-0' Gentlemen: This is to certify that a building will be designed in accordance with A I.S.C. and A.1.S.1. design procedures and good engineering practice for the followings Toads. All welds are per the A.W.S. D1.1 Code. Loads are applied in accordance with the M.B.MA. Low Rise Building Systems Manual (1996), and the design satisfies the requirements of the UBC 1997 Building Code. Dead Load metal building structure only as furnished by RIGID Wind Load 80 MPH, UBC '97, Exp = B. Imp Factor = 1.15 Live Load 40 PSF (Primary Framing) Live Load .. 40 PSF (Secondary Framing) Ground Snow Load 57 PSF Collateral Load 5 PSF Seismic Load Zone 1, Imp. Factor = 1.0 This Letter of Certification applies solely to the building and its component parts as furnished by Rigid Building Systems, Ltd. and specifically excludes foundation, masonry, or general contract work to include erection certification. The design and certification for this project is in accordance with the provisions and loads specified on the contract documents. The customer is to ensure that all Toads are in compliance with Ioca1 milatory authorities. '.' 013 >REt: r .. ... \ Sin,: Yours, • $ I 26113 I euilding r, Planning GarField County 109 Pth, S(11? Glenwood Springs, CO P1.01 November 7, 2002 RECEIVED NOV 1 3 2002 GARFIELD COUNTY W BUt DING & PLANNING ak This letter is to advise you that the building department has my permission to reproduce the approved prints In your possession of the New Creation Church. I understand thet the ori-gina]_ set of epp,roved-_-prints._bas- been lost From the job site, and a new set will be required in order to complete your inspections. Sincerely, O E LTO ANO ASHOCIATER ARCHITECTURE ANO PLANNING Ina 3 •_ _7 A C I c) 9 61 r N w f 7 n o S k R- N u l.. Cul .J n G n 0 n G o i :97n) 9 4 r, - 6 9 0 1 N w reati n hurch P Q Box 1996 Glenwood 3p: kills, CG a1 azz Garfield County Building Inspection Department 109 Eighth Street Glenwood Springs, Co 81601 Dear Sirs; caN P-61)-qa Ccrialf-4) This letter is to address the comments and concerns submitted in a plan review correction list submitted by your department dated November 19, 2001. New Creation Church will comply with all "conditions of permit" stated at the permit issuance. Vir4e.A. 1241 gr) w./ 43:47. fa-442- IV6 W61 "HAW, 8. 13. 14. I S. 16. va ,glgitli'nrifL o4' Ic-*.26t rJ old C - /wea- k." wea- k >C ` apylaces ode 'Add su i mitted for approval after the contractor is under contract with New rea on arc or at particular project phase and before work is to pr m t area. s is o inc u e, but not limited to mechanical 1 lectrical, and fire Protection or an other information uired b the buildin de ent. Panic hardware will be installed at exits where required. Illuminated exit signage with separate circuits and backup power will be installed at all exits as required. Limits on dimmers will be provided as necessary. All doors will comply with necessary code requirements. All restrooms will comply with necessary code rNuirements. Design loads on all floors will be ` s required by code", aaqr}d verified before building of such. 1 oudt f e (cr 4 Pt. airdtdpc4 4-V,aecr(Crr— U The structural of this steel buildin is a "bolt to ether" le and should not require sprtion or any special certification at erection. Plans for the infrastructures have been submitted and will receive all required approvals. Most of the details have been worked out with the necessary departments before final drafting and stamping. The building will be built to comply with all one- hour requirements. Intermediate handrails will be installed where required Wall coverings are not included at this time but if and when they are installed they will comply with code. Floors and walls of restrooms will comply as required. Soils reports will be submitted with the infrastructure plans. The kitchen will be used for in house snack preparation and for clean up after those functions. This item is included in item # 1 $: 2 SPacjAc.- ./4.01reoiriv wIu air G5 2 --1Wrtfy /4134cc-ri 02- 4OpJLevkfte,. ,j� 5 1 — �.f R.O. , Ib Cis-CV1',1 Crir—`f -New Creation Church, (cont) 18. This item is included in item # 3. 19. This is covered in part by the wall section # 1 on page A6. Future details can be provided if necessary before area is built. 20. Applicant is aware of this possibility but hopes we are not making revisions to review but are complying with conditions of permit. 21. We have not reviewed conditions of permit or reviewed the redlined plans for other code requirements yet, but will do so and comply for Certificate of Occupancy purposes. . 0414- inicarnvuoirir. gra 2 iiior VbefIV /N /I16 T?9/Via fileLLI'M jepg Pb SitaiVtift 04- Qz 2 File Notes New Creation Church 6-7-02 Bill Harding called asking about occupancy of New Creation Church. As per plan review and building permit appl. A2.1, S-1, E-3 are the occupancies. Ile said he was not aware of the S-1 until recently and was meeting with them to discuss sprinkler and tank requirements. A.S. 8-9-02 Meeting with Dana and Ron Biggers regarding building type and combustible construction. We also discussed required occ. separations. Sprinklers allow for wood to be in the construction. Separations with fire doors are still needed at mech. Itoom if over 400,000htu, and storage. Stage floor will need to be l hr. Other areas covered are closers will be required at bathroom doors, panic hardware and exit signs are required on exit doors and foyers from saiiii4Sif and youth church. No separation is required between the E and A occ. A.S. File notes -New Creation Church Inspection 1/6/03 Met with John Gill. Reviewed plumping with rep from Railsback Plumping, and mechanical with mech. sub. The plumbers were repairing some leaks and finishing the plumbing in the kitchen. They still needed to run drains from the pans below the boilers and water heater. The mech. sub needed insulation on the AC unit stubbed into the building and a condensate drain on the attic AC unit. I went over a pre final list with John Gill and added some items from the inspection. Panels need to be added to the outside chase for the HVAC system. Flashing or screens need to be installed at the duct entrance to the budding. Some trim was missing on the end wall of the Steel building. We went over my Check List for final and checked off some of the items. Still to be determined is the flame spread of the ceiling material in the sanctuary and youth church. Other finishes are sheet rock and are code compliant. Attic areas for draft stop were reviewed. John will add a draft stop in the attic over the Ushers Room. Letter from engineers on the septic is pending. We went through plans and reviewed the plan redline items. l suggested John review the redlined items prior to the final. Electric Final and final fire dept. review are pending. .7"t1USt z oc4 I -7-A3 41' 14114-4 ?uxias, Pla4 want_ _11<c Rye . ebA oorrzS.aR, 1, a, ti 0.a • t � ... NI S Cc4SS 7 .26- 7 CAalT omit S mw.zitb . t 761.0 /AI 4-ru b 4 tz Coo ci�at,td) x.tuauf- .+9 -(CoP IF o,�. Co A. ..1fi l� proz R-roA! caR RQGF — Ail/ ��i! 7 'L.; f - -- rf_xe c3A-&41 / M-fc.. /lir- o G,;,ik.y 1. aA)) ?IC t roe. ;,wsrr Ssrif to knit. ovr.rt t000 �. File notes- New Creation Church Final 1-08-03 Met with Dana Yerian and John Gil for final inspection. As per Dana, Fire Dept. did their final on the sprinkler and alarm system. Letter is pending. Electric final was noted. Septic final was also completed with letter pending. We reviewed installed draft stop in attic and other items from 1/6/03 inspection. These items were complete. Dana provided flame spread data on the ceiling finish for sanctuary and youth area. Flame spread meets the requirements. Letter on parking lot improvements including signage will be provided. It was agreed these improvements would be made as per State requirements in the Spring. As per Dana and John, the requirements from the State arc pending. Drainage around the building is complete with the installation of the down spouts. Some minor items were noted during this inspection. These items and the following items will be inspected in a follow-up inspection on 1-9-03. These items are installation of panic hardware on one side egress door from sanctuary, finish the carpet on the stages, and review of the letters pending. AS 14-03 f—H.. l -5 0 - Ciac iL ' i4a( /77140} /: l -S.. 3. c/cPp U P '• 'Pitt - i2 11141 . Crtu.69 R.4.$4 te R L : 'Fi Q f , , raves J pe -r a 4-C. d Hr"CrATI sczt /4o3 r itt" Q ?tOt% _ PDA f, mat. li(L art_ r7,4414. -J �_7'2!C - H-crst--- :4-1'01C _. e.K �.�,�s 7 �'t'' _ 1-03 if&., O.1-• )' 74 L aa7rij —. !S ttt4 _-34704C, Sri + -- — - - A66a * Srrti3tsrr _J';rwar+i .,e. -°- . - 9' • — - Foie_ i+*Cao riS . 6 -.� _ . - - o. K. �rac�s_ . _ _. _Acc . -6Axing-ooc''tF--IL /6.01 cl-11249-rel D rot _ a. rano .?. _ 0,/4_ C.� Q�•ll_ - — - .64 , rr_ -� - � + n Ccoi-,<r 1 . _ _ V4131T- Sc.R C304 _s_Sr—erC t%,� ygc, 4 r �r� X71 776aTaN.-0,*(` _ 4- -. 4.s s 1� 26- 7 . (Lieflo.7/1. &, m S -N114- 4944._ rop . _ 1-4 (PO 4, . 4p+1--c.c.W.L 4.. -(ooa S.f 4u. t ' • 0 A-_.)-1P8!-0--Pr Srof _ rF. 14.ru. _ eerie. /coo • • •-• . - , ... .. - • , , , ''• 1 Ni, P. V . ; . '? 1.1: 110.-+. ._- &CO** .: . .. • . 2 '-' • ...1 „ • - - . • • . • . . . AU 9%44 , . ! • , • . 91 ULIA-- i . ., . .14 '51.0.4 141-S r‘l$Mt" =... . • . • .. . . , --....- -.- -- . ! . . i • . • ..- • . . • ' . .••"••-• 1 . . . . • • I • . • 1 • _...- 1 , .•1 . ' r _ . . ' • : .• N• . .. • . • • •-• • 2-17-02 Arno Ehlers, Chief Building Official Garfield County Building and Planing 109 8th Street, Suite 303 Re: Fire Department Comments on Site Plan Submittal, New Creation Church Dear Arno, As we have discussed I had previously met with Dana Yerian of Daybreak Construction to look over the sewer and water plan dated 11/08/01 along with a letter stamped by Yancy Nichol, Professional Engineer. At this juncture I have not received plans for the sprinkler system itself which needs to meet the requirements mentioned in earlier correspondences provided to Mr Yerian and copied courtesy to you. 1 offer the following comments towards this review. Access Access as depicted on the site plan meets compliance to Section 902 of the Uniform Fire Code. There arc throe points of entry allowing the Fire Department to get to all exterior points of the building easily. The fire hydrant is in a good location for easy access, is near the fire department connection and provides us with enough distance for firefighter safety. Water Tank for Fire Suppression A 10,000 gallon underground tank is being installed to supply the fire suppression system. The church is considered to be a Tight hazard occupancy per NFPA 13. Dana has shown me documentation from various fire suppression system installers estimating 8000 to 9000 gallons as meeting design compliance for sprinkler and hose requirements within NFPA 13 for this project. Underground Piping used for Fire Protection Supply Lines In addition to the plan notes regarding the water main stipulated within the plans, the main needs to comply with the enclosed section of Code of Colorado Regulation 8 CCR 1507-11. Essentially the line needs to be installed, tested, flushed and inspected in accordance with NFPA Standard 24, Private Fire Service Mains and their Appurtenances. A completed copy of the Contractors Material and Test Certificate for Underground Piping needs to be provided to the Department prior to final hookup to the fire suppression system. Existing Building B The existing building footprint on the plans states that a proposed daycare is intended for phase 1I of the project. In my conversation with you and Dana we noted that this potentially constitutes a change of use and fire protection would need to be designed with this building when phase 1l occurs. We appreciate the efforts the Church, Mr Yerian and Sopris Engineering have conducted with this project so far. If you need further information or have questions please feel free to contact me or Chief Piper. Sii ely Bill -k* -ding, Battalion Chief . W.-. Piper, Fire Chief Apia Yerian, Daybreak Construction Yancy Nichol P.E., Sopris Engineering 806 COOPER AVENUE GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81601 970/945-4942 FAX 970/945-6040 Pap 10 5.6.3 A signed letter on the registered contractor's letterhead explaining the scope of work, start and completion dates, and a statement that tenant finish, remodel, or additions do not affect the hydraulic demand design or integrity of the existing fire protection system is also required for submittal to the authority having jurisdiction. 5.6.4 If it is likely that the hydraulic design or integrity of the existing fire protection system has been affected by the scope of work, or if the owner, mor, or authority having jurisdiction has concerns about the system integrity, a NICET Level III or above review shall be required. 5.7 Underground Piping used for Fire Protection Supply Lines 5.7.1 The underground supply line installed between the public water main and the fire protection system riser must be installed in accordance with NFPA Standard 24, Private Fire Service Mains and Their Appurtenances. 5.7.2 All underground supply limes shall be installed by competent contractors and shall be inspected by qualified inspectors. A copy of the 'Contractor's Material and Test Certificate for Underground . Piping' must be completed and provided the owner and certified fire suppression system inspector by the contractor. 5.8 Additional Conditions 5.8.1 Flow tests an water supply systems must be less than one year old, unless approved by the certified tire suppression system inspector having jurisdiction. 5.8.2 When calculating water euppty requirements, deed ten (10) • percent from the flow test. Show the actual flow and reduction on hydraulic calculation sheets. 5.9 Exemptions. The following projects are exempted from plan submittal, Inspection, and approval requirements` 5.9.1 Pre-engineered range hoods and duct extinguishing systems. 5.9.2 Any work desarbed in this Section 5 that is conducted at any facility owned and operated by a mining company. 8 CCR 1507-11 - t THE CODE OF COtfRAnn armu s��ce Other inspections 1. Electrical rough by State. 2. Electrical final. 3. Fire dept. final. Kon Biggers 945.4942 4 S f. r.♦SPIc-troat F;$1 f4C7 INDUSTINAL SERVICES RECEIVED NOV 0 4 2002 GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING & PLANNING Final Report for New Creation Church (Garfield co #8250) Upon our initial site visit on 9-9-2002, it was discovered that the high-strength bolts (A- 325) were found to be not tensioned to the plan required specification. Additionally it was noted that at seven locations a standard machine bolt grade five had been substituted for the required A-325 bolt in critical rafter to column connections. At several locations field fixes requinng cutting and welding were performed to attempt to repair factory fabrication errors. The workmanship exhibited in completion of these field fixes was not compliant with applicable codes. When we requested copies of engineer -approved drawings (RF1's) to direct the work required to correct misfabncated components, we were told that there were no drawings. A certified welder allegedly did these noncompliant field repairs under the verbal instructions of the responsible structural engineer. Clearly, the workmanship and techniques used to facilitate repairs were not indicative of work performed by a certified and experienced welder under an engineer's direction. Additional work completed that was not in compliance with applicable codes was found at the entrance canopies on both the Southly and Westly sides of the building. This deficiency was noted as bolts that had been left loose and welding that had unsatisfactorily performed. Pitkin Iron was notified and work to repair these deficiencies was undertaken by their staff. Work by Rocky Mountain Steel Structures to tension the high strength bolts using the turn of nut method as specified in approved plans began on 9-12-2002 and continued through the date of 10-14-02. Many of the locations where bolts needing tensioning existed had been framed over and sheetrock applied. At these locations the necessary amount of demolition work required to access these connections was performed so that all A-325 bolts could be tensioned. This work continued for several days. During the process of bolt tensioning some additional items that were noncompliant appeared. These can be characterized as holes that had not been drilled to accommodate bolts at required locations as shown on print, and also as other bolt holes that had been torched oversize. In both of these situations the appropriate measures were taken to correct findings in such a manner to be compliant with the approved plans and applicable codes. Rocky Mountain Steel Structures undertook this work in a demeanor best described as very willing to correct what was needed and do it completely. After a small delay to allow for welder certification testing, the staff of Rock Mountain Steel Structures acting under the direction of RF1's provided by the Responsible 1✓ngincer removed the defective work as noted in paragraph one and then completed the necessary re -fabrication and welding as necessary to complete the building. With this work completed by both Rocky Mountain Steel Structures and Pitkin Iron Co: Industrial Inspection Services certifies that to the best of our knowledge and ability, all the high strength bolts in this structure (A, B and C buildings) have been tensioned to meet the plan specification. Industrial Inspection Service also bears witness to the work necessary to repair mis-fabrication as noted on inspection records is now complete and in accord with applicable codes. Industrial Inspections also declares that the code required tension -testing of high strength fasteners was not preformed as we were not employed prior to erection of building. Additionally there were an insufficient number of bolt samples available to provide tension tests as required in the applicable code. None of the fasteners to be used in the structure were eligible for tension testing as a RFI allowing their reuse following testing could not be obtained from Engineer of Record. lly Submitte4 Damn Smith Industrial Inspection Service PO Box 639 Carbondale, CO 81623 1-970-963-8452 DUSTRIAL SPECTION SERVICES P.O Box 639 (WDnL1=, CO 81623 963-8452 963-8452 PFioNE/FAx Date 47—/Z—OZ Project NCW Ce4;d7-)O/t./ SPECIAL INSPECTORS REPORT Bldg. Permit t!�rc4_ 4i€R2 Sd Address Owner / lrlA// Led:e !A Type of Inspection 77.(y— Architect •C2•�•� T' a. Z /' b Engineer ,�t + .� �Q T General Contractor A,Gc.e9 477�i✓ t1.Q,C"J1 Subcontractor 0/",11 STeC1. Welding Electrode —. Welder _ LOCATION OF WORK INSPECTED • �!>E �tiT�SC� .S s� -%ate r/✓�p�rCyitcw D' � t4' *e..ez-.4- 24 4323 _ OrE.�� jam` �isl��x�.Jil�_Q ,�C1/C1J•//�%L ScC {�� ,iZ2een:X40 Se3.17,--ZLS, (7.) <4/.‘7_*(7;e1,_./V4. l414;e2 ctso/LL �. LI;41 47rE-1 .AK gid./ WORK DESCRIBED ABOVE WAS WAS—NOT +J PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPROVED PLANS CONDITIONS OF INSPECTION. All rup0•Is w.J be held unt! :account is paid 1r It1 f All inve.CCS are Faya^4r 1OOr /K'er_1 AT nv0.cCS w.:11 telarl.cs remanng anparrl ed at me rale 01 1 5C° i oer -0011h SorviCeS prnnded'.y IldusIr1al Ii5pic7rOn Snrw; es ((ISI are ;Vied it I re Ar ovemenl5 .'.1 4 and A -hues r'+nimurn5 pros (ravel bane A 1.hO i charge ,vd upCFy to al Canraolat.ons ,nlhOul 24 hoar nr.-t.ce Should 115 M luqunod to a,s1'uIC k Via! .a[IrW Or 'nu tan Ina -tor ut :nab' lrcjr" rd as a rnsiJ! 5' yrur acte:hmce Owls sera:„ Irckc'_ IIS vn 1 k. en11100 •0 aterney's lchs and cJS'S involved n said sail A 77we hurrl'e_ della! proGvrlq10 :;has any :r;11jr or -.11 pena'r tn. a lowed try law vr.1. bo ed 1O al CSSCCks IelurrM1 v1Cdd 1Ir5 1.00 1,1p:e rep esonts a Sum-w'y of nhoervatrnr5 and Inshny lry IIS p.!•5o,nol II 1s :rally 510o(1'lla• 1.5 11se5 n(,`1 Irc nnce CfrgrleCrllg Sery cos 10 nor any drror-1.01 or s•r;Jery 5 n r 011hr:x:ua! wcr, Cf thr C'011•ario' AI's r. mtleyo0y. sub c rll•d.1Or+ u 011,,nr melts I he co'nrd10' t5 he•eby g vel no:.:r Ina! nlylher 11•a! crescrl:e cl cur 1reW per ,a ono! :1111 the OOs.nvahon cr :eshng by o it •nm stall excus.r Them ka any deacis 015CCveICd n WOl\. nr 10' any ncmc0rr'pharce wen .apll';Nab parrs anal :!-r lnnl b..10orq codrs I•..5 .11su ulcn't'aod ;ha' I.S w II not he respcn5blr I1 any 01-S11e 5ale'y Or: n6 Or 0115 pl0lrrl. nernrr 15 115 Ic ':e held respcnyrble 1C1 :Ury e•1v111X1- re•1ra- 1mpaCt as a rese- el the noselvanor. o• tesLr q Of any work no any .obsae 17 s •.he coil-acicr's'p.. r^a app! can: s 1e500nsb1l17y to r Onnzie sale and •trad ly avai1ab10 access lc al alCa5 rex!-nnq ns;.rclIOn as per I b C SCC(., c 109 1 Lrabday k;r any wO•k periernle0 by 115 15';:r1clly+rm.:1-d 10 tr.r 1+61.15+515 dein11C 111 1E C SCC J]a-IA�R 5OVCrnr y ciSprcf.01 arlml PS spector's Name //i/z‘,/ 4 Certification M CBO /d4)/.1.2449 Oma` Time In / ' x.4,0% Tine Out t $ 2'..Authonzed by Signature Dale (Project Superintendent) ''11• INDUSTINAL °SERVICES P.O. Box 639 NDALE, CO 81623 963.8452 PHONE/FAx Date Project/g/ [•✓.lt�.�F�'iCrt/ SPECIAL INSPECTORS REPORT Bldg. Permit a 6 P -Aced f ? 13262:, Owner /Wm., eg.4-,77.eczotti Architect ,a .s r C. > General Contractor /vCso✓ 7,e44/ ciiWfeZ4 Welding Electrode pie .t •ok-.2 Address /V, Aid Type of Inspection 1,../a.,g�pry _ ►%i 2rce j Engineer �Q ./7 e,4.4050 i�414.4.4 Subcontractor f�QIC�J//1/r/S/S/L Welder LOCATION OF WORK INSPECTED - ' i r' r 1 _ _ eve -44'-r ' -'- 0 - ✓ - OEC/ L�.rQJ C51A/ S ,f..Jrlt /fry% 7 c'4/1A, •4444V 4 ? 7 2'4,441 ' . ez:64.WW �TiYKIo. A(..Q...,� 7z,- e7 -.e. & 497 /� �c ,GyQ 5 i!U S �� tI;eZ41e7C()64076-Zi- e4i7 S� ' :::4ao?= xxi !4 ''.7-,7--e"7&0!) l€Z7e-3-25340Ls, o'/�i�D .I�ozrZ5 3 - 2 xo a ,4, •, 4,7,v /-ems a>N716 e- 4-2c 7, CP. LC, .< 7a 45./7-._5-14,45e//,/,7- - -' a ie r&,..<•.s •T•a✓ /4'5 s06E C.44, 9or GL 14.he.t.7P-c .��c �€luvecria✓ .? dC r u4-AItee.,-74 SID ?:../‹.- 5, ix,e- , WORK DESCRIBED ABOVE WAS T NOT �r PP�HEOR_MED IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPROVED PLANS CONDITIONS OF INSPECTION: A11 r.1;:.rIS ...a be ne1C ant I acc'ou01 15 Cal .n full A I .n o.Ces a.e o.lyablr ince", r.cl:lp' NI InvCw:eS with ba axes. rerrontng ur{1ad win 1.1 hlkrd nlefesl al the rale 0: 1 5O% pel mural. Ser, ces p'Bv.rAd try IMns7 1. Ir .(11 C.rn Ser. re, (l'S1 aru bred .n 1.I.WI rKrfrmenl5 d1 4 and 8.hcur mmm.lm.5 pus !ravel t we A o.hcul cha a w,1 apey ro or w cell:Hons. wn'ta.1 tad jr na CO S1CI.l. .IS 5n rr ;lare, 'O ms'IMr Iry;r1 .s l 5.1.1 ItX the c 41u 1r ,1 O' Oehl mcu're0 as a reSuIl CI yr;ur k crgaance 0r :PIs wr.nce Lcw1_ :IS w 11 be enr.r Od 10 .ltt0'nry's'rm,: :Ind costs , r.o iC1 rn sad sul A two hundred do lar processen reC pus any .5rh1r.11:1:d pen:dhrs alnwud by Llw wrl oe app Fez ro a I checks 'crurnr0 ,.Fu] TIL. held repot l re_reser:5 a sl.rrmary o: ccse-va'nns arr.! •rs e,) ny IIS ; r•unnnl 11 Iti Lrwher,lu0d the 1.5 does not p:Ovloe englnoe'Ing SC"ICCs IC. nor any d :rr_rn ry sn{vvlslun CI he aclua work o! tee con:factor. 1's rinpluyees. sub.con1•aclo: s or other agents. The COr11raGOr 5 .1Breby given not 111 11.11 wwlttw'r :lr llll!::CI'[_O cI cur 'IUk1 pler5Onnel '10r 11,e Observation Cr leSlulg by 0)1 '1111 Shall Orr114111-.im kr ale ae'ects o.sccvered T work 01 10' any nor 1urr410.11' .0 w 10 approved plins ann amoral -4r r..lk1m; cu005 11 Iti jIs;1 uxlerslord 1:1x1 115 w11' 1101 nil responsAle IC, any On S'r .o1rty on rh s ut al:y prgec: nellhel IS I15 10 bo bulb IOSp005ll 0 '111 ary nlnrun• mental Imoacr a5 a '0x'•)11 0' the chservat 01 lir tnst.i.-, cf any .1r, 0u ary jobsle I rs the COr:raCIOISLperm : app canrr rrsp:nyhl;y to prLvl.1e Sale alio 14401y av5lwt1e aCCe91 rn all auws Iuqu,rIry Irs;t turn as per 1 U C sechOn 1174 1 1 wbuty I0r any wok perlrwm. d by IIS Ir Slrl11 y Im111:d lu 114. clV1s40rs Ce'rled Ir. 1.8 C se,mcn 1 114 R grlve•0 ry mspeitott 40104 e5 *Pectors Name ..�4r.E-A Certification a 61C-1130 e<O 4'' ' /0 Signature Trne In 7 'CO Time Out 4,..‘95004 Authorized by —_ •NDUSTRIAL NSPECTION SERVICES P.O. Box 639 NOALE, CO 81623 ( 1 963-8452 PHONE/Fax Date /CMZ Project Afek., 4442 eof SPECIAL INSPECTORS REPORT Bldg Permit p _. ddress Owner Type of Ins on ioei AtZny— . Architect _ jEngineer I General Contractor 1 Subcontractor Welding Electrode _- Welder - LOCATION OF WORK INSPECTED 4a7 -40V -A t ' 04"" ,e) # /� -,14v-,pel2" "de; ,41 Ateee4 goe,7- ����� �!-�•o !, 0%P WORK DESCRIBED ABOVE WAS WAS NOT 'J PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPROVED PLANS e -eEjoy .4S ",407-450 1t �DITIONS OF INSPECTION. A: recces w..l be held Loll OCOOu,r is pad .r 1,15 All n11r..ces are . aya^In 1{x;1. ri-tc st Al nv'.1.les with Minces l r a nine) l.nyas] .11 M h Red -511r•es1 at rho rase 01 : 5C`.e per r-omn Services prnv dee b •1 .0 1•.al 1rlSpecLOn Services II1SI :1'e b 1100 ri 1.hour :rcrer-onrs al 4 ono 9•'oll' m n mums ph., 'ravel 1 re A 4.hour [Paige 01,1 apply to 0:1 cancellations w'1 Out 24.1+1.11 -*bee S•xx-I:1 I'S OB •BQj.-rd ;n ir51tt,11e .eya1 ar:lcn 10: Inc :n Irc1.0r ul '7reitJrcJr-ej a5 n Ins 1 0: your rrepr 5%e 01 -Is, Selvlee'.c5e1, :15 will be erlulyd 111 aocrrey s 142r5 and COSTO rno:vPl r1 Sad sol A !x11 hl.ndled dehar 11,:lcessrl4 lee phi, any ydd.:Cle1 penalt es n1•rnved by law w.I o0 ag7.ec 10 a 1 checks rel0.rnc0 unpaid The, I.eld 'cpo't repie-.1 1's a summary Cl uerSSOl abOrs .Ir1d testing by I.S pers..rncl 1 .5 urdersto0y 1.1a1 1 S dors not p•:ynslr rrtgvl*errx; ,rry 0115 re ler any lSreC;O'l or 5.merry 5 On u1 C1c actual work u11.1r ronbOC r ifs lr 1 oyeeS. 5431-crnrlaClo'S 0: other agosls The corcrel:lur is ribby green r.1,CP It O1 ne'1-Vr t'1r 15 05e•.ce ut (X11 10.11 personnel r1CI 'tie ubServa'r0n ur 1n.,I tq Sy Ot: Inm sra 1 e5CYl5e 1.1Cm for any dela_;y r55c0verea rI wr:ra CI 'Or any nor compl.arce with a11Crrmoo clans a'.r1 app5cab"e 1111 k'aro c00eS 1• , a 5o unste•.l10.d 9 01 115 0111 riot be r(ytr:nsiole 10r xny rn.Sne 581uty .:n tn-s 01 Ary p-o1r=' '1e.ltlel 1s 115 t0 be ne10 Ierx;lnsde 10' any erv.r01. mer.'a1 rpact ati ,1 ICsu11 01 11 a Chsl:rval.o s Cr 'csSla o' ayy ..ori pr any 1.0,s r 11.15 Irq r;xltraclC' slwrmtt app .Ca111 5 rnslln'ls b.I y l0 pr. W 1111 Sale aril le.ldtty Ova labra access 10 all areas rerpir.rq I105pe[5+05 a., PC1 1 BC Se.;ax- 50) 5 Liab.S.ly 'dr any w0:1, prr armed by 115 i5 S111CI:y ImrtC(110 the Zr-onsuOrS oe.'e,cs ' R C Sect un 104 A governing ns^ro1.On actrmies ipector s Name 457,27l7� Certification p CBO ic7 4,-7 '-7/ '• Time In: 700 Signature (Project Superintendent) INDUSTR1AL SERVICES P.O. Box 639 ONOALE, CO 81623 ( 1 963-8452 PHONE/FAX J Date 47--/4/-19.2 Project-A/Ek/e4f.4�i e *te 1 o4'2 SPECIAL INSPECTORS REPORT Bldg Permit 4 `yskrtfjr40 45)' e25b Owner Akths _ 4.7'b4/ t t Architectf /may General Contractor /f�C;l..cl ���44+�i(b'ti e Welding Electrode Address /ASis Type of Inspection i'i".i STk M .8tl:'/' Engineerira_� ��- Subcontractor �s �1/,/,/ri(% 57 J Welder LOCATION OF WORK INSPECTED -.Z/vetx4 doe. #4e, /5_47&e-agss - , � �� *"."52- 7 __ /i s. . 0Zr 71, L/5/01//A/ .2L T A/ Atop5i5:e3 1 gyp' .� ,moo A 7' /� 1"' 4 x .7� .,��cyr�%,�o�- ► 'vX Z� / T -�� WORK DESCRIBED ABOVE WAS WAS NOT J PE ORk 1iAa5)RDANCE WITH APPROVED PLANS exp fF rjICZJ CONDITIONS OF INSPECTION' All reOwls wry Cr. nek! Jnr 1 .X 7n.,nt rs pad in L,' All mucuses arr c:rydt; e Lpon 'n_ap1 A'I .rwvcrs wan balances 'errarrlrg Lnvad w 11 Ml b-Ilec rawest el the late O' pei r'MIh Sn'vrLeS provderl Cy Ind.51rra1 Irnoc:f.ren Serv.cos 1151 are orled .r 1.110L.• ncrC•mr•, a• 4 and 8 1rwr rnearnl.••"+s pus ravel •vne A Chow rimrge .11 a:..p1y :U aJ1 carrlP:r:,er S without 74 dk:ur nonce Shx'd 1'5 5C 'n;r.u,ed .o irShh,ht ''gal ac:ron I:v the collection a' debl marred as a resr:h of ywr arceptancl: n1 Inns senme l -.c el. 115 wl. be er.olled It. ar..orney's tees and costs .rvuhred rt ..:ac sml A two rnrrured 001 a• cruLess.rp'cc p any adorhrxr:a ocralhes allowed try law wiJ o1 app ,ea 10 ai rnerirs rnIu•ncd .unperC T'+rs hrlrl report reprr o his a S.,m•nu•y uI Observabors and lc -sing by 15 per ornel It r, ,myrrrsl0od that .IS roes not enoreerng rerncps'.). nor a'+y dre`.'acr 0' snln•rva,on of :hr ac1La worn cl :re S01t .nctu• as emolcyces S rb.c0nlraRcrs or O:her ager.:s. The cor•rgrtrr .5 hereby grvrr nuhce lhat ne.tr ur :1e p•oselcr . a our f e'd pusher, or Me observal u•1 Or toshrg by our tum snn11 excuse them IL'r any cOrK-Ls c.SCovruM Jr work. Or for any ncmcnmphance with a,'.p"ovea 4)N -calk, t...h dng cools 11 Ls a so Jed .,ic: X,rl that IIS wit MI be respenyhle for any cr•Sile salary cr Iters or any l,•;llecl. ncrlher IS 115 1c bo held respo rsrae 0r any en.eron• n•+ental rm=del as a '15.,11 0' the C.SOn pIJ0.r Or testng et arty ww0'1( 0, any ,r,<srre I: s :br cm1,acIsr's. plfrr•,I apprwnrs respors b hry :a provide sale and rear8ly av-a, ab o access 10 all ar1J., req nnrg flISpeChan as per 1 e C Sl:clrurl 109 1 1 i.Ityhry kr any WO•k perk;' Med by 1 S s'r c11y 1.M:.71:1 to 1:e yr0vrsrcns del red n 1 BC section arruing .1.54:eclrOn Ylrv.he5 spector's Name47„Ri, �74-./y Signature Certification It aTCBO /174/4/4©y''BJ— Time In % Time Out: 94,14 A thonzed by Date _ 9 /174-dZ__ (Project Superintendent) ••rw1 rig .s.. - IHDUSTRUAL INSPECTION SERVICES P.O. Box 639 ALE. CO 81623 AKW 963-8452 PIioNE/Fax Bldg. Permit _ Owner - .. Date _01‘7/--102 Project [EL.., , eiF 7:7,15 orc-Z SPECIAL INSPECTORS REPORT Address Type of InspecAneiC— Architect /144—Engineer _ .. General Contractor Subcontractor f _ Welding Electrode Welder 4- LOCATI N OF WORK INSPECTED 77e4 c_iCry% AeZ 44 2 ./� i�i� It 7 t 1"z �v� � sca�.�E�. c -u-72$' seo7:* idevori .¢-s ..� �� T� v� �w � •e ,�J.4�- 9-�/ -��. _ 7'EE a-4.e4y .."4,,•2/4 d s 4.67.z.r,� Gare E / T" WORK DESCRIBED ABOVE WAS D WAS NOT PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPROVED PLANS CoHO(TIONS OF INSPECTION' 411 10:73 -is ...+ be 101 (Int 1 ,iC:Ojnt r5 ;arc re Lel, An Ir.O.c05 a'r ..lyable apOn rccerpf All Irr O.CeS eveh I1oLrnc1S 'ereelIrrp Lr{UJn1 vetl be NEM .nleres: al he rate cl 1 5O% pe' nxa'h Sery ccs p:wrced by Irchrs'r a .11.p10101 Scrv,ces 11151 are hi1M1 e . •h.1)ur i1CX0r eels 41 1 a'd C.1OV m n n-urri5 plus 1ra+m.: rr.1n A 4.'1041 Chel:ge wit. an;ly to aJ C.a1Ce'IOIUns w11hOu! .1 -hour nr:r ce S.1Cu12 IIS co 1450.1110 10 u1511u1e legal ad 0110 the 0011401011 0' debt me arreu as a ICA11 t 0' your ak.eeprarrn GI MS Sees, Ce hrhrt I'S wr 1 bu en1,4e0 to alnrney s'eeS end 00516 rrevve11) .1 Sao Sun. A NO ruedied deter prOCC55rrl IC.' 1.1115 any 111ldrr-na1 penell.es allowed try law w,I be .lppLed'C a1 d*elLs Ielurned voald -h 5 fie 7 report rep'BSen15 a 5.erm.-ury of cebServ31.ens ..111d feS'anq by 115 pnl-.core' 5 s undrrs'oucl a al 115 doe:. iv provide e1,mlv'rrr9 Sel.rc05 •1 -.Or 1ny d,Iecl.Jn rr Supervise -on of 1110 artlnl work 01 11e Carltrarx. its elpbyt'eS 511h cor.'reeclCIS 01 Olncr ager:s The co-lI ac1ar rs he:rtry ryven 1O'ICc rh:e neither the presrv.:e 0' Orr hell ',rt. -tine' 10. me nbsrnr trel 0' rest ng :-y 06. 1.Im S1'.41 0.0u51' 'her for any detects d .clrlC'ed 1r walk. or for arty r.On-CCmOLa lcn wrtn 4.11454) Marc an: appi1ea0I11 hu Iou•y codes 11 .5 ..111 ult:e'S'00d 'ha: I'S w)1 net be resporsi)e lu' any nn can Safety On :his or Oly weezcr. Ire :het es 1.5 rn he [lel 1050.0nstee 10• any enee0n• menta rvac: a5 a res111 01 118 Obsrrvl1cr or IeShrfj nt pry work 0n any ; Plat.. L S 'he co11•a'-;xs'pr:'rsI aeol.Gu,', rnsLro:rse:a5ry to pro. de gate ane reaody awaaatAe access t0 all areas Ie1umreg aspect -n1 AS Der . A C. sod 01 1119 1 1 all ay IO' any wfra penu'rled by 15 4 5111:115 Irm11e0 to •hc rr 1wL runs delne0 11 • LI C sed 01 1on 11 -- • 11.11q10Spea 01 ;7clmnvs Ail" pector's Name . 'LVA-, 5.,1:7'74'1 11, Certification M Signature Date 97--"4" Tune In 7-da2witTime Out: v Authonzed by: �( (Project Superintendent) �M ti�Vrr 1+.1.1 IN DUSTIHAL SPECTIOH SERVICES P. . Box 639 NDAI_E• co 81623 (- ) 963.8452 PN(1NE/FAx Date _%? CZ Project &4_.k! C�+Frre4 SPECIAL INSPECTORS REPORT f Bldg Permit # cc:2_ 6-a . Address, 4,440.. Owner A/Sai` eep_ .A/_ �i_r,AdeeLX- Type of Inspection #_STAICAY%A, , Architect _16,42A,4-6. c ,e j_Z Engineer F 2 ..7.—Ce fe r04. General Contractor „/Z4vg.sr_egeizz.4 Subcontractor 7V t cw0� Welding Electrode _ Welder fcv+f/R/iG Al _ LOCATION OF WORK INSPECTED L '4OS c..aG r%GT9 7iGK/ 61)yS e ie(=1T C ir7.v it//'V_ d g, &:>Z 7' /,4 / ,u&- ,//v c� . , iil1,l�,Uc/A452 7 - RC1 �S CfY�.�.v 1�.�r�64-3Zear WORK DESCRIBED ABOVE WAS WAS NOT a PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPROVED PLANS CONDRIONS OF INSPECTION: AY repeuN w'I OP Bela ur.:r, accoxra s pa d 01 5.11 Al r.1vo CON Ale payPC a upon rerrpl A I nvr. vs w :h alarces remaivly unpa d ...'re Oe bd.Od irleress at Pte rule of 1 SO% pe • mor 1F Suncus crcvKler by .rAc3 nel Inopncl.On Senn( es I11S1 ate h Ik.r 0 1 hcur rxrer-.er_s a' 4 and Rd1Our minrnu'4 ph.e tt:Mil lime A 4.1.0,..1 merge w.J apply In Si cancclllt.00S with0ul 24 hour roto Shetld IIs be requur•xl 10 n511ute le;a' .41 nue 151 'Ari cel e0t.On rt debt na.rrrJ es d '00111 pl yoJr :rrc'fpla-4Ce 01 11:.5 Service 'Owl. ;IS W11 be enht.eA to attorney's tees a'r0 costs .000k.ed 0.00 spa A two hundrnd de lar prxISS r ire plus ar.y :Idd'o'v-I penar..e5 al rroduc IN law wi I bn a; p'4M IU filcher -3m "el.r-ter 1.I pad This held report reare5en:S a ser-erary Ot obsevet.c.no aril le5hny^ t IIS pe•5.0111e• f' .5 i-nnerSrood !NI: IIS (.-es .-(:I prnvr40 e,q.sro'+ng servers tc. 'Kv any d •e..:.Or 0' .l,prrv.ycn of lee actual w•,pk 0: the c0r'Iactcr..1"y orr player's. sub-c0nrricturs Or otrvlr apen:s The cu -trait.., 4 he'rhy q.vel no're 4041 r5ll.L4 the : rnsOIXe 0' rk.r 1.e10 pemu'.nel ro' Iht1 c0Servar .1.1 Or test n) by cLr hen. shaI excuse [nem ty at detects d4cave'ed .1. work. 0f tor any r.On-cemplance xnlh a«p rsn i Glans aro appor.,c'e bu IO.r) codes I' .y a'sc unne•s1000 'ha; IIS w 1I rr.I Le re5por%1.Xe 10' any un.5.10 salvey on 'his or :10y plc 00. he •1*.e• S IIS to be held reso0n5lUe Is any ernnron• mrr4a1 ..npsc• as a resift or tsc nte.erva:.cr Cr leshrg JI ary work ;in a.•ty:O0 1.1 h .s :he C.k-I-aaors•permrl a:'pl.can:'s respu 15r0.r'y 1n pruv.de 54% :.k reaCdy .owIablo accxs510 a'1 areas regn.nng .rspec or. JS per 143 C 40001cn :O 1 lkeorI ly 'ea ..1-y xWk pnrplmeh1 try I'S U s'r r..1ly I.m -e0 1:1 :h0 prcv.srors dc'nec .r 1 li C sec:r:n ' Dti 0 grve'nnq .nspel'.rn act.Y.:reh •. Certification # 1.1613C<",274/4/64W pector's Name �J/✓ �fj!±.?2 E _ Signature Time In: % enc Trne Out horized by Date ?P-116 "'1:52 (Prole uperintendenr) as. 1 IN DUSTRIAL SPECTIOH SERVICES P Bnx 639 NOALF, CO 81623 ( 1 963-8452 PHONE/Fnx Date . 9—'7-40-Z Project iar/L!/fu¢e,C SPECIAL INSPECTORS REPORT Bldg. Permit ts-PvyeF-✓Ghz7 _Cze, 5Q Owner .445 W dgearArz", Architect r c2. 7.05. General Contractor /l/fie✓ �iQF4Tt4:101l ,ma?se Welding Electrode .A' -rte _ a#Z Address "lee* Type of Inspection 1 s 'icTine* A, Engineer adO �// Subcontractor Welder A/c=1,4.l, _ LOCATION OF WORK INSPECTED Oce' - -1 4,•4=b4.0.5 5,00 O&�i os- 4.�..,S,1 e � � .. s7.�./e50ro 'crams To oIGT�, I1Qee4e.. 70 -+ ����s �c vsiav�.v��� G�ae rb soLu..:.dcyt%7+07— .a..�J 'vGT 4cI S W ' 5, / 7";,..4lt,/ aF /[/ 9 ,409�rx�li !'�E u Q,t .4.4oc,•ay.O4z. • C 23/57-2,. C/67,2/ 4'i 4} moo. C4/4 C.7 /.si C;/s61,_ CV -17817 ed. -1/7 C/- 3,/c c z S/S'r, e2. ?5�S -...a. . r //:1 ,Scserle .yldctszTar c.4.•Als ,c-7 X sc I'« e>* 7-.4‘is ,4422 .rcto d=2.%. 44 e_axagK /!JAS !647)7- p W 45't4"0-12,,,,eLLJP—Are) WORK DESCRIBED ABOVE WAS WAS NOT E RFOAMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPROVED PLANS Es«4D OTL�.L� T2C0NDfTiON5 OF INSPECTION: All fowl,. wr1 t er r girl wild arencm .0 r,r1 ,n to 1 All ,nvo,c es we r.ay-ab+r t ' ,A(O,; r Al F�vn Cgs w dr Val a 0135 rrma.',r,� unpa 0 wrL nn n. IM .ntnrest i' 110 rate 01 1 5.0'. pe. mord- SCrv:rrti I.,;rw:ked ::y I• oLsIi,al Insoect.on SO'vrces 01S) :rn: bats! .n 1 .ntx,r ncre'ner•,s ar. 4 and 8 M. Jr rr.n.'nu'ns el.'s Ird.el hme A 4.r0jr charge wi I app'y :n 7l1 rartetahclts wr'1.oul a.nuur rtin Ce a'gi.Id !IS or rryu 'ell In rrshrare legal aclrur '0r :he ccl echnn cf r1r!w .rcrrnrl JS a •.rsull ul your acceptance 011hx, sn'vrr Irrkel. IIS vAI be er: lled 10 aro' rey 5 lees and cos's rnmemn n sari tied, A Iwv rutdred & Ta' .sr0c4:5,5,rg 'nr1 ptrc any a:11r.ore' peia:l es aiowed by'aw w it he a 1'1rrx1 to :d1 [_wcks relu•ned anpad Tnrs bold •ejr0•t rripie%r,nts a summary CI Obsarvahon5 and testing by I.S c.ersOnn01 II .s under:V.0 d 11 a1119 :Saes no: pro".de en¢roer ng serve -As In. r.nr ary red On Or 5ucery 5 on of me ar'n,ri vrr:rs o11he cOnhacl0• ds employees s07.cnntcrcrxa Cr o:tin: agents, The Cor'r4C10r .5 nerrby 9,1'0 11 li.:11lu Iha: nether Me nr05MCC Ot Ou• 1 n.;1 personnel nor '1.e ub sena b0n al Ie5'.'t6 by our f.•r• tinirt nllC•1tie'1'er-1 .01 any delecl5 dISCOVa'Cd .n work. or 114 any rrar.currr,;ra'tce w.'11:rppluved plans ane app inane txrl:Lrg CI".CLS 11 .saw anderslood Irat 119 en1 nn; be Iesmsnsc,: 'nr ..ry On.s,Ie sa'ety on 1-15 or any : rnlarl. mei,' ti IIS 10 be held •espcns.ble for any c:mron rental nr,oacl as a Iesull of me nNw;naer:n or tntihr9 ul ary work on any .obsde a is tre contracts' sp.:I.' .I acplxar•'s responsil try to p!11,110 saw ar4I rvadl y avadabte access to at areas rewnn9 .r,oectlon a5 prr 1 K C s4 . i ,n 109 1 Lab. fly 10' any wc1. per'or-rrCd by 119 r4 5'r CIIy hm'ed to ire pr0,nsrens defnco rn 1 fi C vir t ..1 8 Soverrnng ci5pecl 0'1 acimhos ector's Name Certification # Time In /- ��p4 Time Out VA29,410, Authonzed by: Signatur Date (Project r,ntendent) DUSTRIAL SPECTION SERVICES P.O Box 639 .9(NDALE, CO 81623 0) 963.8452 PHONE/FAx - Date p—/7.-- Proiect /f/i.-_,eAtswxricsiacia2c4 Ryte 2 elf2 SPECIAL INSPECTORS REPORT Bldg. Permit pig� 1L EO '"IlliSeare) Owner /(/ Y Architect E.QA e -S7 - General Contractor /l/E6.,./ G /C' i/_ Welding Electrode Address 464, Type of Inspection r!"% ,turf Ai;1 Engineer f�Alp-07.•!!_ Subcontractor .42T -5)Z .5.7176'./. , A.4l Welder LOCATION OF WORK INSPECTED 7 .46e COP �•+�i r av�is�ll,/ /Qr�,� .�� H .4� a .4,--t/Ec.77t'- - IJ/QC/.S Lj/ 1-?• SAI A /7�7'O.4.0, / 50 7b crwrAaC Lc 407-. c:..✓s .���.rr..oi vi �?�ua� .� ��� a i,ZIgs ,7 ea.,7 2',77e-', 77C0V , ate / 'S.c. 4Ce. ,ra,(,teiSve .T e.D AA/0 ' ( 7 427�r/ f As4G ,4/ /s 72, . . r dev).`" Z dam r _ - -� ��.=: -ootof-X7',4 0 le ti/ -5. Ac�.4 /' VV -Z /C :47z 9 w/4e TCS SND 23d,7-" 7.t✓s/owi E AC s w,-4Z.� 7 /fie c/s/iet, 7` .1 A 6 ,•464/,2 ©ACexe// eC7ie>t/ WORK DESCRIBED ABOVE WAS WAS N Ti PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPROVED PLANS /far CONDITJOHS OP JNSPECTJ0H: A1u he held unlll account Is pard rr I.r I All rrheoces are Fayanle yx:n rete �r Al nw;.:o w'h Calarces rn•n, :n rug u'Ipatd wIL -r L•Ir.rxl Irrares: at Inc •are 01 1 SO -b per menu. Servos wowed 1 by Indasb a' Inspect un Sirwrres VISA arc h., tri in 1 .•ix: ncreroory a' 1 aryl 8.10.11 n i 1'V"15 ptu- Pavel hme A c.rau charge wI I app y 1n an c3rkcIL3hOn5 w.tt OJt 24.1 O.,r nctce ti11:uk; IS De rc^,r.Irrn r0 ris'rIo!e Ierja aria n kx ire cOf1ect 01 or drt.i Inctried as a reSu11 nt your alc-eplance et Intic surm 5 trriwel. IIS we. he entered 10 allorncy s rens and Co515 .nwctwed In .iu1 Sul A Mh N./10.Ni r10lar prOCc55rng ler Mus any add :nn,ll.mases drowe0 :y leu wil tk1 a_O!red to a'I tied, relu•ned unpal. TIS hrkl rep0•l recrescrts a wn:rnary a C0serva:anti ar;1'est ng by 115 pr r. ru e' I' 5 tnee•e::rrK1 Ma: IIS does rw:I p•:orx engrlee•Inp se•v. r!s 1u ,ler any d ra'ron n supr•wrson 011he ach... work a ae ccnlracto . 's employees. sub.ccnraa:re or olher argenrs The c;rrlrac'Ar 5 •rrnby riven .note 1111 louver !re presorrr nl nur 'rOkl personnel nor Ito notirrrvah;rl Cr 'eshng by 0.11 'Ir "t 5'ldll excj54 Mem :el Any Cheec15 d,5CuoQlrxl 'n w0:k. o• 104 ary bon.ccmplanco wrih 0pnrrvrn: pldrS 3'10 app, .r_'u txoFding code'. II I. also under510od t'I.. 1115 wrl cul ;:e reSp0'1Sfik' 8r run/ 0.1.5'8 5a5ery on 1115 u• any D(Opc'- nrlthnr 1. 115 IU be nob rrrcO0rL5ae U• any ervrrnn• monl.,l Impact as a resJ11 a' the cOServarun 01 Ics'I.1; of a.ty wort cru ary Icbsr'e 1 151110 conlradn'o'permo app.canl's respen501.1y Io orcwalr safe and really ewan.1120 aCce55 to a.'I arOa5 reODmng resp,, Nei a5 per 1P C nvr-I rr 109 1 Lab hay for ary work _erlprmrd by 115 Ir 51,1 -1.5 Lrn.led r0 1110 rrNnrr0r,s cehned n 1 P C yec1.o4. 10.4 8 povelnng mSpechor• ace w,!rec pector's Name to Certification aSBO :f41:9Q--,61)S Signatu Date 9—/7–' Time In 71504 Time Out: y Authorized by :v v" (Project Superintend t) IN DUSTR(AL SPECTIOH SERVICES P.Q. Box 639 iltNOALE, CO 81623 ) 963-8452 PHONE/ Fax Date ar P, 2002 Project -*kw 6c m .4' c (edieW SPECIAL INSPECTORS �REPORT Bldg. Permit #/�?fY{eQ Address iY„�4—__ sr �,//.�/ Engineer _ Subcontractor r/l-'/�t/�.04111,7i�r..47: .S_ Welder-X!'"l �//t//C.�' Owner 1L�elQ. srk Architect .6-7-44.46Type of Inspection General Contractor /4/ [ e,.4r7t2: c/cam 44-€./( Welding Electrode--%/� LOCATION OF WORK INSPECTED fO!//Lim e4/ 4/2�4E��.�,G Vec''7.`nK✓ a¢' /.✓c ,� dlge k .,v r .mss f or eo,,,jD.eaPe QT -7:44'.5 -moi T. 5F , ' 4 -'.Q- s %a v y /.4'o. / 7-6 it' GI 2 Zgae A/ ,'e7 _. .77 v ( &7 • Gt.44,5 � 1� J,� �Y SY�,Q C/ ot.Q�ur/.t/.Suf ��nr7`A4ZI ..52,0e;,a. r�,as r.S .atS� Jiv . G`1Cs 4-4,/4'5 '74/,A9 e4 7 4 e p•c•/ 4 clS .v7,�tl.�N,B �.r4 ♦ d s+ Ar WORK DESCRIBED ABOVE WAS ig,55. %/t petaww .. CONORIONS OF INSPECTION A I repcns .11 t* P.e tl Lnnl ar:. xnl s pad .n 101 Al. rnnrces are pay:eC'r! up Ol •ecerpt Al nrv:r[es w.lh baLincos re'ta n no u103.0 w.d :;e orled ...rem,' al II.e •a:e cr 1 SO.!, oe• moral. Serrnces crcv.drul by Irdusrl.al Inspu, lion Services !IIS1 are, h Ileo in 1...lCur :ren/newts at 4 and B.huu' mn rrlrr5 p •e. !rave. •.-ne A 4.9:ru' charge w 11 apply •u all Carceranoos w :foul 24.r.:iu• r.0I..ce Srn.,k1 IIS be rerpronO ru aesl •L!e lo:o. arn]rl :Cr :he LCI ccnnn rt debt rx.urred as a 'Tend!! ul yw• accep'.lnce 1•4 SB•vice 1 d.er. IIS w,l. be er•a18C lo am.xcrey s lass and cuSIS flv01ved .r sa d su : A N.: 1ury1C '.'OIL,r I,ruc'ess.n j lee ^Y,, ary a:U.1011a pena'. 5 aSowe d yaw wII he :eppl.ed Io all cw•`.rns reiu'ned ,rnpart Teti field :epo•1 r,o resents a sr:mmary 01 r.e v1:a S erd :es!n9 by 1 S ot••rfixl'1eI '.1 .s nrr1Cnloo3 Mar IIS Arcs 1101 p•prr4e crag rv1erre4 spiv cps to nor nr.y orrec1.o4 Or sJ11YV s n, 01 19e aclual vn:r. Cr the cptt:.. ctX. d s emolcyccs. snb•cOnl'a: Jrs or ether agents The conlrac or s 'e.:re5y 1)vOn nor c0 hat neither :he prrheroe Cr oar'.CId Gr11.111 eel nor 11-e 00541v7.1101 cr •es:e'l; by our 1.1r shat. C.c Jse 11-rn'or any de'Orts d.scovered n work. 0. 10• any nOn•rCrr•plrar.ce w :r nt,oro-+ed plans and a;:pl.cable 1,41.16 1; codes :l .5 also r.rklurslu0: that 115 w. No 5e responsible Mr :ary 00.5:e 5a:ety ..•e lIrS 0: ary prnlr:•- rer.Iher .5 115 ro he 1eld resp0 541otn 1.31 any envron 'newel .mp.:rt as a reso!1 u' the rhservjl un ur !4T.9 j 0' any ma, un ary 10191.1 '1 .s the c;x :rarlrr x.pnrm .. 444.0.01'1. respons.ha ry 10 Ornvrll• sale anu really .5111- ade ac0855 10 a 1 areas reCc+r.95 115.1., Lon as per I U C reclean 109: Lrrh I ly 10< ary v.p.k ^rvlurmed by IIS .s Sr•rt y landed 10 itis : ov.v:xca Se•.neJ 'n I B C senor” 04 B rve•nnG mspCCl.un :,c1w.l.es ector's Name ay Certification # Signature IN N DUSTAIAL S.PECTIOH SERVICES PO. Box 639 W11\1DALE. CO 181623 953-8452 PHONE/FAx Date /(9-/2 o.J Protect/y 4Pc e,drit,K/ e SPECIAL INSPECTORS REPORT Bldg Permit / 1 P/F, a 04:9257 Address / R Owner / `C1'.6+r.4.4/ .g.frriktoe Type of 1nspectionLQi /�i�f4rt. 012‘00,0 Architect(Gj'7 a, pfd! Engineer _ General Contractor /it 4.0 cEedw'acad_a0444f Subcontractor Welding Electrode`' Welder _Ce, LOCATION OF WORK INSPECTED /ed' G�ey✓v�i�/G/ G/ �.dC �f . . f,'t/ Q_ G4,:F/A#_i4.01,MD ,7e51% e_ >i AJE-e-e-sse To fasuP,ei 'z4 y . D / 7 -02. ,4kGC Gc i� i �SZI _1" •04..S cisme & 7 0 , 4u/ i V 4 '-'0/B — T /Jx4,0.aL,�u-d e .¢.e 1,,424 d .7_Aa7-,r1c 71L57" .ti�I .e3G41,"& iV 4,ers)40.4/- / . Cso/ffooD/ W s 7? AZ>Lel /B•C�,�� �T�Ae iiv[r./v1 GCs A/�J1J /.S / !/ ed,AfQLr a vee .,/7.,/ . !/ 11.1.Z40/d0til° 7Z,- - ' C.9.DEs..2 , ;44 e A36eic vero rte/ . GG Ge,•4.7'iiv � 76 ,615 o Gc. .aD s cl•� L ,�e- •f6 �L _44i.z‘e,-7;.••• G*1-- 6‘,_27 WORK DESCRIBED ABOVE WAS WAS NOT 7 PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPROVED PLANS CONORIONS OF INSPECTION A5 reperrs w,l rrrr neld ulr.I dCcn.Int 1s ^a1C n 70+ A:1 nvarcos rrr. payable upin rete pr All +r•vpces wlt1 bdlances rnry n ng unp.1•i w,Y ce Da -ed 1I1-ereS: et the nee d 1 SO'. --. :e: mcnlh Servl_es :xrvlued by Ird.r s•r, 'rlspec: 0n SrrnLes (1 S: a•r MI rut rl : .h0J1 InC'ryne1l5 at 1 air B•hiu' m.n nol.rrs p u5 tr:rval :rl'le A J•rhOur cnargr red appy 10 41 Ca.'1Ce1471 Ons wlL•IOVt 24•hn,r rollce Shr:Nu .15 be re ,1ara} -0 15511ute :1+Jai aCICn to, 1110 Co lectgr of :klt;I IrcJred as a 'rtiJf it yol. • aC-cep'dr1Ce o• Iha 'e vee I.Ikel. 115 w,r be enhliOd to ana nay's 'ens a:10 cows rlvohled n curl .u11 A twn h1.TxlreP dolar procusslfg 100 p t,h a1y ad:lt0ral O1y,aII es a'iCwoA by Iaw 'x.1: be apN tut b ah (tw . relLrred Jnoalu Tors hrkt Lp0:1 rerltr<CI-:s a Scrmnry of ObSernatlors and Ie5tmg Dy IIS oe:501no1 1115 ulde•s:ourt thal IIS cies nu• pion do englr.Rir ng serinces tn. ru• any 0110(1-01 51 sucery 5 51 uI I:rs acv:d woof sI :hr COmrac10l. 15 errpluyeeS. Ai1.crrrllraCl0rs of other a;or is The cont':r:1:ir IS nercby r) vel nO:1Cc 114.11 re•:her the ;.re:%0104 Ot au, 111 rl p0150rn01 nwl :hp observalgr 111 :eShny by 0..11 11•h shah e.ruse them 101 any Cuk'C:s dscovcred 1n work. cx kir any ru'rCcmplanCe n,th a'prn ei plans ,Inn npc1 Cable 11-1. an; C.0 es It Lr a60 urderstcrxl aril '15 w11 no. be IespOn9ole 5;r any 01.5 -r salary 0n m s hr dry p•cercl. 'leliher o. 115 10 be 1'Ctd reSponslb a 101 a1y cmnron• nWn1a1 r-Ipact 41 a 10911 0111.e ObSc•vahin ur !eV rsg rt :cry wblk cn any 1nbvlu 1 1S the rnr:rad0r s perm.l apylcasts re,,pen9b11:15'0 Crcvda sae, and read ly nv;ulablO a0Cl .s •0 all ale:r. IedWnrlg 1•1spoc-r.n as ye, 1 R G sec—Km 'Cr, 1 LUG.' ry for any wo,k performed by 11S 11111d y imurW ru a1e Jrov1s1011. iehned n 1 P C Ser 5 (1:Ironq 111500011nn aC:mh0S pector's Name 40 Certification * BO /04i4/412..--'_5 Time In: 7n1, Time Out: Authorized bar: Signature Dale /2 -/2 O2 IHSPECTION. NDUSTRIAL SERVICES P.O Box 639 053NDALE, CO 81623 0) 963-8452 PHONE/FAX Date /2- Project 4/641 1 /eleMbe SPECCIAL INSPECTORS REPORT Bldg Permit ft 6 � '�-V Address /Vf4/9 Owner /frid-eel a AckV C / 1/.4e, Type of Inspection Architect eeA/4f d -A%- ___ Engineer General Contractor Alie J C / Subcontractor J. J- Welding Electrode Welder _ LOCAT N OF WORK INSPECTED To.'~ r .Fehr' dy/CJ/01, s Co •„Criea•✓ .Zoll �t�vSiay.rvy moa _�/ 7*a40 111-C eG/.all WORK DESCRIBED ABOVE WAS WAS NOT Li PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPROVED PLANS CONDITIONS OF INSPECTION. Al reports All be hekl twirl ac:u-nr Is Laic n101: A I nw,nc-os are payable upon rice pl All irvgros w,w baLan:os erns ropy u1patd .1 br baud Merest al the rata, 1 sC-... prr rwrdn Serous arnvwltsl t11' Ird ,sir a n5.per.:rin Srrv.ceS 11 Sl are d1 ed n '..r., 1r m_•emeits al v. air! 8•S0u• m n mums pars (rave. ame A 4-h0u• -large w 11 apply 10 ell car1C0I t ares w'ruul 24-hot•r nonce Sl iS-I IIS be regurrc4 1n nst.lce legal act 0-1 for Mot c: Ale_.rcn 01 !ebt Inc.rr: ch as a IPS1n 01 you' accep::uw:e a 11 4 5e'vC0 1 Cks1. 115 ant' be er.h111d 10 attorneys teas anti costs r wowed it S:I :1 tire: A `vr0 nurd'n:1 rin.11r p•Oce551ng ICC plus Any add.l,Onal pcnatI r5 alkwell by lax *IL be aro.' ell :u al J10Cz5 rCh.rrin1 u-r:ad 'h 5'.Cd report represents a Sunutlary Cl Observar tort- arm !rasing by 115 persn4..•1C1 11 i4 urderstood 11:1: 115 r10e5 nC1 prod* eng.nr ring SernCes :J. nor any 1IO.:1101 or arperv151pn OI IMS acrual wcr4 Of thr cmPaL10:. 5 ernoklyees. S.6-cOnra. Drs cr other agents The l:Onlractpr tis 110104 y giver nct.co Thar neither tee presence J' Or.1 AO: personnel ror r•14 Obsnrva'.4;n u• leu ng Dy Ju' 1 rrr shall ercuso -.hen'ur any de'ecrs OISCrvuretl ,n work or 1n• any ncn.c0'plyl0C0 wi1'1 aap•oved p an4 4r.I acpl.Cable bulldl1g It IS 4150 urice.4OOd .1.at 115 ...Inc! be 'espOrsCn tn: ary 0n -51r0 sa'rty nt 1ris 0' any prof s:. se1lher is 115 re 1* nelo respo'15rbkr kr any envil0n. menta rtlpucl a5 a •eS.rh tV irwl rb5er1ral 0n Or :o5hng n' any w.ek On any I0b4r1C 1. s the! CnnIracle(Lperna a; plrar.rs resp0lsrr.I . . .de sate and rua:aly ava..ab'e arces5 t0 aJ areas rrqun•1g inSpe&trOr as lwir 1 8 C Section 100 I •L.ab Ids 100 any wpm r. 1: rrwd by IS .5 SLnCTly Irr.ro0 1G'1•r 4rp1510n5 0011h1.1 Ir. 16 C - • 104 d r ng Ia5p0rnun aelret.CS Opector's Name AZ/A/ .5:0i77(V 1 Cerirtication # [�'fCeO �+Dy'85 Time In 7a, Tine Out 'Zeal* Aufhonzed by Signature Date _/9_4/ 1*. r L (Project Su.1 tendentj rn C� O K •I ?W.% rim7 Zohn C U 491 -7gs - Assessor's Parcel No Date ! //5-* '7(e I 1-1-k) BUIL2 ? 9L-1PERCIS 5 CD SI� f Job Adder��sjs, � � /^�� � .`/C�{ /�-,� Owner IVUt/0 C,rf(J, 0 A .� C�' L Address 6 -Phone ;191145-5/04) Contractor L 1 S U t- Address 5;30 e Phone#9A(1-:_c.110 Setbacks: Front Rear Ore - Olurak RH INSPECTIONS Soils Testy " /� f- i Footing .2-72.'3/ -rte 4) /)-?).4)J4-fl-O2 2 4. Foundation a' Grout,,3 -'j' Underground Plumbing W141;2-0614'8414/4/3f7+ak: 1. LH Zoning Weatherproofing Mechanical 7 Electrical Rough (State) Electric I Fin State) !' 4-03 ylady�inalL 0 Checklist Completed/ Rough Plumbing MP '-a+ `C'2, ) Certificate Occupancy # Framing Date Insulation Septic System # Roofing Drywall Gas Piping r1 f4k /0 - zz7:2 Ar • E xr io - 11- 0? -114-- W 1 71O(t DA24,1 144a Dam Er,- 3o -0z. 44.. r T Army Fr7T f-+fi+w9-Ui -ozr7 � f�9i'1 - /C - -0 L £. (-t- q £ t n-51, / [f `g'` Date Final Other 4.15410s NOTES �Ce 1-15-e . 0 _ xuca.fi SR4.I,ttirrk.t Pa4 1 I S elf -Pi.A411i 60,4 (continue on back) ISG�i S �k✓e o . - , 761Tg►s'JG} lL' - a 1�-kms _- fltti? ru- t (� ozT--- o. � -0-_ ri i. ._ 77/6r-Ler2e0zsr-R Ze,cieV _ 1/ 7 _ 11- 21-04 .. 5 iJ, k�,�ti� /jsr fR] .. - Atom - w l- 8-03 5....SAL... /hr�r� _ _ _. pl . i « 416rA Q ,at- Dear. n z'- • ,rutty/4. 3 ( ,c 12 (-14T04-4t 4•10 C,r tz# F "I' 0 Zi.e4-Wwfilif Otis Diff (4.1*-02:*1 D. g. 44aa- ,, E______45rfficti-4-z.._ Tztfcs 0K713 Fd(gle 4'/ 7/v 410 r"zv bfr5i'� ji .tet '- OK /0 �upol it ault EitipEa IAy an e-AtSS- s)//e h.e iziCAc- PA +SSS 50414 - err 1+/p Oc �-v—N SeCi,J SoFFtr tfpDr- ►010Z-- -� sowsiD p"o-Trt PJz OK if/rrl Q INSPECTION WILL NOT BE MADE UNLESS THIS CARD IS POSTED ON THE JOB 24 HOURS NOl i('}; REQliIRF:Q FOR 1NSPFCfIONS BUILDING PERMIT GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO Date Issued.,.f. j .Qncd Area Permit No 15(...) AGREEMENT In consideration of the issuance of this permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with all laws and regulations related to the zoning, location; construction and erection of the proposed structure for which this permit is granted, and further agrees that if the above said regulations are not fully complied with in the zoning, location, erection and construction of the above described structure, the permit may then be revoked by notice from the County Building Insuector and IMMEDIATELY BECOME NULL AND VOID. Use Address or Legal Description Owner j�'��` Cretila 'j Setbacks Front Side Side Rear This Card Must Be Posted So It is Plainly Visible From The Street Until Final Inspection. INSPECTION RECORD Footing 7 - > o.. _ 1..S Foundation�, / �'� (2,r' Underground Plumbing 5i ' . ,,,' �- �� insulation Rough Plumbing 1�j.-.2 _t; _cfff� Drywall* Chimney & Vent In Electric Final {b} State lnspeetor) ,el, .ilii .. ) Cas Piping / - -4,'....4-,—...„ Final /-7-0 3 Ars. Electric Rough (By State Inspector) Septic Final 1.7- az ' Fra ming/0--Zz--oz-Wil-- (To include Roof in place and Windows and Doors installed). Notes:*r nra,c R�fLj11.4- 4114*( --- ALL LISTED ITEMS MUST BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE COVERING - WHETHER INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR, UNDERGROUND OR ABOVE GROUND. Phone 384-500 Date THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE 109 8th Street County Courthouse Glenwood Springs, Colorado. DO NOT. DESTROY THIS CARD Bylyi &lot_ 7115- g 2 13-, IF PLACED OUTSIDE - COVER WITH CLEAR PLASTIC