The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutApplication - PermitI Garfield County Building & Planning Department 108 8th Street, Suite #401 Glenwood Springs, Co. 81601 Office :970-945-8212 Fax : 970-384-3470 Inspection Line : 970-384-5003 Building Permit No. ·o ~-- Parcel No: · \ 1 ,. 0 S ~, 0 0 ' ..?u~~own -deed attached Locality: Job Address: .,_West 2nd St Rifle ------------------------------------------------ Use of Building: s/f on finished basement w/ open & cov . Patios & att . Garage ----------------------~--------------~----- Owner: McKenzie , Ryan Contractor: Raz Canst. Fees: Plan Check : $ 1,566 .86 Septic : $ 73 .00 Bldg Permit: $ 2,410 .55 Other Fees: Total Fees: $ 4,050.41 1~1-00 -----Clerk: Date: I ~ ;;; )1o~1£~ GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION ~_.. -,-fr::7 I08 8th Street, Suite 401, Glenwood Springs, Co 81601 -~ C::: .. ~ _ -7 ~ ~ 0 D Phone: 970-945-8212 I Fax: 970-384-3470 I Inspection Line: 970-384-5003 S 5 ~ _ ~ www.garfield-countv.com ~ Parcel No: (this information is available at the assessors office 970-945-9134) ()f'J/<~'''"'" A?-·, -n~ -4.-A~ a,,;,S,~tJ -sC:,t. <!~Av~III.Sov·,...,c;~V'JIII,.. 2 Job Address: (if an address has not been assigned, please provide Cr, Hwy or Street Name & City) or and legal description 1ror '-'€sr 2.,...0 s;-/l.t ~ (!.() '1~)1) 3 Lot No: Block No: Subd./ Exe mption: 4 Mailing Address: i'co ~. • sr. A ,ifA !II~ 5 6 7 8 9 Describe Work: 10 Class of Work: o Alteration o Addition 11 Garage: Septic: o Communi 12 Driveway Permit: NOTICE Authority. This application for a Building Permit must be signed by the Owner of the property, described above, or an authorized agent. If the signature below is not that of the Owner, a separate letter of authority, signed by the Owner, must be provided with this Application. Legal Access. A Building Permit cannot be issued without proof oflegal and adequate access to the property for purposes of inspections by the Building Department. Other Permits. Multiple separate permits may be required: (I) State Electrical Permit, (2) County ISDS Permit, (3) another permit r equired for use on the property identified above, e .g . State or County Highway/ Road Access or a State Wastewater Discharge Permit. Void Permit. A Building Permit becomes null and void if the work authorized is not commenced within 180 days of the date of issuance and if work is suspended or abandoned for a period of 180 days after commencement. CERTIFICA TIOi'l' I hereby certifY that I have read this Application and that the information contained above is true and correct. I understand that the Building Department accepts the Application, along with the plans and specifications and other data submitted by me or on my behalf(submittals), based upon my certification as to accwacy. Assuming completeness of the submittals and approval of this Application, a Buildiog Permit will be issued granting permission to me , as Owner, to construct the structure(s) and facilities detailed on the submittals reviewed by the Building Department. In consideration of the issuance of the Building Penni~ I agree that I and my agents will comply with provisions of any federal, state or local law regulating the work and the Garfield County Building Code, ISDS regulations and applicable land use regulations (County Regulation(s)). I acknowledge that the Building Permit may be suspended or revoked, upon notice from the County, if the location, construction or use of the structure{s) and facility(ies), described above, are not in compliance with County Regulation{s) or any other applicable law. I hereby grant permission to the Building Department to enter the property, described above, to inspect the work. I further acknowledge that the issuance of the Building Permit does not prevent the Bwlding Official from: (I ) requiring the correction of errors in th e submittals, if any, discovered after issuance; or (2) stopping construction or use of the structure(s) or facility(ies) if such is in violation of County Regulation(s) or any other applicable law. Review of this Application, including submittals, and i pections of the work by the Building Department do not constitute an acceptance of responsibility or liability by the County of errors, omissions or discrepancies. As the Owner, I acknowledge tha ility for compliance with federal , state and local laws and County Regulations rest with me and my authorized agents, including without limitation my architect designer, engine dl · I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE AND UNDERSTAND THE NOTICE & CERTIFICATION ABOVE: DATE STAFF USE ONLY ~'~ ~8, ;2&J3 ~u Adjusted Valuation: Plan Check Fee: Permit Fee: Manu home Fee: Mise Fees: 3S2/IZ3 . ~ I Sb&. ?b 2.4/D.s.f ------ a,.s D~ee:~ Total Fees: Fees Paid: Balance Due: BP No & Issue Date: ISDS No & Issued Date: 4o5ro.LI ~ 1514. }\.( ~J L/ 'Jb, 'd \\D~t.; L\L\1-'-\ '13.10 Setbacks: OCCGroup: Const Type: Zoning:. zs; z.s ·, 1 o Ajl'/,eb BLDG DEPT : PLNGDEPT: #~6 -0~r d~~ ,WfY ' APPROVAL DA'PE APPROVAL D E The following items are required by Garfield County for a final Inspection: I) A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector. 2) Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department and posted at the structure and where readily visible from access road. 3) A finished roof; a lockable building; completed exterior siding; exterior doors and windows installed; a complete kitchen with cabinets, sink with hot & cold running water, non-absorbent kitchen floor covering, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove and refrigerator; all necessary plumbing. 4) All bathrooms must be complete, with washbowl, tub or shower, toilet, hot and cold running water, non-absorbent floors, walls finished, and privacy door. 5) Steps over three (3) risers, outside or inside must be must have handrails. Balconies and decks over 30" high must be constructed to all IBC and IRC requirements including guardrails. 6) Outside grading completed so that water slopes away from the building; 7) Exceptions to the outside steps, decks, grading may be made upon the demonstration of extenuating circumstances., i.e. weather. Under such circumstances A Certificate of Occupancy may be issued conditionally. 8) A final inspection sign off by the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department for driveway installation, where applicable; as well as any final sign off by the Fire District, and/or State Agencies where applicable. A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (C.O.) WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. A C.O. MAY TAKE UP TO 5 BUSINESS DAYS TO BE PROCESSED AND ISSUED. OWNER CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A C.O. IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATING PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET. I understand and agree to abide by the above conditions for occupancy, use and the issuance of a C.O. for the building identified in the Building Permit. OWNERS SIGNAT DATE Bapplicationdecember2007 VALUATION FEE DETERMINATION Applicant Address Date ~R~y:;;an::-;;M;.::c:o:K::;:en:"z'7ie""'----:--::-:-:::------Subdivision 1404 West 2nd street, RHle Lot/Block ,:7,.;/3;:.,/2::.,0,::0,.::8======-----Contractor Finished (Livable Area): Main Upper Lower Other Total Basement: Unfinished Square Feet Valuation Conversion ofUnfinished to Finished Total Valuation Garage: Valuation Crawl Space Valuation Decks/ Patios Valuation Covered Open Type of Construction: Occupancy: Valuation Total Valuation 1485 sf 1430 sf 1358 sf sf X $74.68 4273 sf sf X $41.00 sf X $33.68 794 sf X $18.00 sf X $9.00 782 sf X $24.00 : 63 sf X $12.00 Commercial sf X sf X sf X sf X sf X sf X N/A N/A RAZ Constructon, Inc. 319,107.64 0.00 14,292.00 0.00 I~ 7 '-Y. "" '1}5,.40 19,524.00 0.00 352,923.64 PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST Applicant fl1c_kfl!t 'Z.--l ~ Date '1/3/q 8 I Building / Engineered Foundation N L Driveway Permit / Surveyed Site Plan ~Septic Permit and Setbacks _:!__Grade/Topography 30% V Attach Residential Plan Review List -- / Minimwn Application Questionnaire tJj II Subdivision Plat Notes ~Fire Department Review / Valuation Determination/Fees \/ Red Line Plans/Stamps/Sticker / Attach Conditions ~Application Signed V Plan Reviewer To Sign Application ParceVSchedule No. fV' JA 40# Snow load Letter-Manf. Hms. V Soils Report GENERAL NOTES: Planning/Zoning __LProperty Line Setbacks U( II 30ft Stream Setbacks t{!t Flood Plain / Building Height / Zoning Sign-off tJ(!J Road Impact Fees N/11 HOAJDRC Approval Nj/J Gradeffopography 40% lf/1 Planning I ssues !1/j!J Subdivision Plat Notes GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING 970-945-8212 MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS For SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING CONSTRUCTION Including NEW CONSTRUCTION ADDITIONS ALTERATIONS And MOVED BUILDINGS In order to understand the scope of the work intended under a permit application and expedite the issuance of a permit it is important that complete information be provided. When reviewing a plan and it's discovered that required information has not been provided by the applicant, this will result in the delay of the permit issuance and in proceeding with building construction. The owner or contractor shall be required to provide this information before the plan review can proceed. Other plans that are in line for review may be given attention before the new information may be reviewed after it has been provided to the Building Department. TWO (2) SETS OF CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS & TWO (2) SITE PLANS MUST BE SUBMITTED FOR ALL APPLICATIONS. Please review this document to determine if you have enough information to design your project and provide adequate information to facilitate a plan review. Also, please consider using a design professional for assistance in your design and a construction professional for construction of your project. Any project with more than ten (10) occupants requires the plans to be sealed by a Colorado Registered Design Professional. To provide for a more understandable plan in order to determine compliance with the building, plumbing and mechanical codes, applicants are requested to review the following checklist prior to and during design. Applicants are required to indicate appropriately and to submit the completed checklist at time of application for a permit. Plans to be included for a Building Permit, must be on drafting paper at least 18"x24" and drawn to scale. 1 Plans must include a floor plan , a concrete footing and foundation plan , elevations all sides with decks , balcony, steps, hand rails and guard rails , windows and doors , including the finish grade line and original grade. A section showing in detail, from the bottom of the footing to the top of the roof, including re-bar, anchor bolts , pressure treated plates , floor joists, wall studs and spacing, insulation, sheeting, house-rap, (which is required), siding or any approved building material. Engineered foundations may be required. A window schedule. A door schedule. A floor framing plan, a roof framing plan , roof must be designed to withstand a 40 pound per square foot up to 7,000 feet in elevation , a 90 M.P.H. wind speed, wind exposure B or C, and a 36 inch frost depth. All sheets to be identified by number and indexed. All of the above requirements mu st be met or your plans will be returned. All plans submitted must be incompliance with the 2003 IRC . I. Is a site plan included that identifies the location of the proposed structure or addition and distances to the property lines from each comer of the proposed structure(s) prepared by a licensed surveyor and has the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing? Properties with slopes of 30% or greater must be shown on the site plan. (NOTE Section: 106 .2) Any site plan for the placement of any portion of a structure within 50 ft. of a property line and not within a previously surveyed building envelope on a subdivision final plat shall be prepared by a licensed surveyor and have the surveyor's signature and professional stamp on the drawing. Any structure to be built within a building envelope of a lot shown on a recorded subdivision plat shall include a copy of the building envelope as it is shown on the final plat with the proposed structure located within the envelope. Yes ../ 2. Does the site plan also include any other buildings on the property, setback easements and utility easements? Please refer to Section 5 .05.03 in the Garfield County Zoning Resolution if the property you are applying for a building permit on is located on a comer lot. Special setbacks do apply. Yes vi" 3. Does the site plan include when applicable the location of the I.S.D.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System) and the distances to the property lines, wells (on subject property and adjacent properties), streams or water courses? Yes ../ 4. Does the site plan indicate the location and direction of the County or private road accessing the property? Yes !I 2 5. Are you aware that prior to submittal of a building permit application you are required to show proof of a legal and adequate access to the s ite ? This may include (but is not limited to) proof of your right to use a private easement/right of way; A County Road and Bridge permit; a Colorado Dept. of Highway Permit , including a Notice to Proceed; a permit from the federal government or any combination. You can contact the Road & Bridge Department at 625-860 I . See phone book for other agencies Yes ./ 6. Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all reinforcing steel in accordance with the IRC or per stamped engineered design? Yes ..( 7 . Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl spaces and the clearances required between wood and earth? Yes v( No ________ __ 8. Do the plans indicate the size and location of ventilation openings for the attic, roof joist spaces and soffits? Yes ~ No --------- 9. Do the plans include design loads as required by Garfield County for roof snow loads , (a minimum of 40 pounds per square foot up to & including 7,000 feet above sea level), floor loads and wind loads? Yes v 10 . Does the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor, and roof construction? Yes ~ II. Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists, wall studs, ceiling joists, roof rafters or joists or trusses? Yes v' 12. Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method of positive connection of all columns and beams? Yes V"' 13. Does the elevation plan indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the undisturbed grade to the midpoint between the ridge and eave of a gable or shed roof or the top of a flat roof? (Building height measurement usually not to exceed 25 feet) Yes ~ 14 . Does the plan include any stove or zero clearance fireplace planned for installation including make and model and Colorado Phase II certifications or phase II EPA certification? Yes It""' No ____________ _ 3 15 . Does the plan include a masonry fireplace including a fireplace section indicating design to comply with the IRC? Yes _____ No ,/ 16. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that egress/re scue windows from sleeping rooms and/or basements comply with the requirements of the IRC? Yes V: 17. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that windows provide natural light and ventilation for all habitable rooms? Yes v 18. Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass doors, glazing immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as a walking surface; sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub enclosures and specify safety glazing for these areas? Yes No / --'--------- 19. Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces, boilers and water heaters indicated on the plan? Yes vi' 20. Do you understand that if you are building on a parcel of land created by the exemption process or the subdivision process, are building plans in compliance with all plat notes and/or covenants? Yes / 21. Do you understand that if you belong to a Homeowners Association (HOA), it is your responsibility to obtain written permission from the association, if required by that association, prior to submitting an application for a building permit? The building permit application will be accepted without it, but you run the risk of the HOA bringing action to enforce the covenants, which can result in revocation of permit issued. Additionally, your Plan Review fee is not refundable if the plans have been reviewed by the Building Department prior to any action by the HOA that requires either revocation or substantial modification of the plans. Yes t..jA 22. Will this be the only residential structure on the parcel? Yes ./" No Ifno-Explain: ______ _ 23. Have two (2) complete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the application? Yes / 24. Do you understand that the minimum dimension a home can be on a lot is 20ft. wide and 20ft. long? Yes v 4 25. Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other construction code requirements? Yes / 26. Do your plans comply with all zoning rules and regulations in the County related to your properties zone district? Yes ~ 27. Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a final inspection by the Garfield County Building Department? Yes ~ 28 . Do you understand that approval for design and/or construction changes are required prior to the application ofthese changes? Yes V"" 29 . Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a "Plan Review" fee from you at the time of application submittal and that you will be required to pay the "Permit Fee" as well as any "Road lmB.Stp ct" or "Septic System" fees required, at the time you pick up your building permit? Yes v . _ ___L __ _ 30. Are you aware that you must call in for an inspection by 3:30 the business day before the requested inspection in order to receive it the following business day? Inspections will be made from 7:30a.m. to 3:30p.m. Monday through Friday. Inspections are to be called in to 384-5003. Yes ~ No ------ 31. Are you aware that requesting inspections on work that is not ready or not accessible will result in a $50.00 re-inspection fee? Yes v 32. Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the IRC including approval on a final inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy and occupancy of the building? Yes ~ 33. Are you aware that the Permit Application must be signed by the Owner or a written authority being given for an Agent and that the party responsible for the project must comply with the IRC? Yes -/' 5 34. Do you understand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed Electrician and Plumber to perform installations and hookups, unless you as the homeowner are performing the work? The license number of the person performing the work will be required at time of applicable inspection. Yes ______ L_ ________ ___ 35. Are you aware, that on the front of the Building Permit Application you will need to fill in the Parcel/Schedule Number for the lot you are applying for this permit on prior to submittal of a building permit application? Your attention in this is appreciated. Yes /t.tta,..;t= JA,..,a tJiv/11~,.; IJ£1..;~ j'.llf-ucA.SSt;!J 36. Do you know that the local fire district may require you to submit plans for their review of fire safety issues? Yes ~ (please check with the building department about this requirement) 37. Do you understand that if you are planning on doing any excavating or grading to the property prior to issuance of a building permit that you will be required to obtain a grading permit? Yes ./ 38. Are you aware that if you will be connecting to a public water and/or sewer system, that the tap fees have to be paid and the connections inspected by the service provider prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy? Yes • 1T V" , I hereby acknowledge that I have read, understand and answered these questions to the best of my ability. -< (s=;:: sfgnature of Own~ ~ 7 Date Phone : ____ JL3='.-c(p_-_2..=..=;_o_._?c::..o ____ ( days); -------=~=--....::;.Z...-"'£_-------=9<-..:o'---L_,'(L...a. ___ ( evenings) . Project Name: '[)t£ ;t'le/t.£i'J-e,it ~S10e,..,e£ Project Address: IS'OV w. z...-<J 57 6 Notes: If any required information is missing delays in issuing the permit are to be expected. Work may not proceed without the issuance of a permit. If it is determined by the Building Official that additional information is necessary to review the application and plans to determine minimum compliance with the adopted codes, the application may be placed behind more recent applications for building permits in the review process and not reviewed until required information has been provided and the application rotates again to first position for review, delay in issuance of the permit or delay in proceeding with construction. BpminreqDec2007 7 id11i ~\1'1. n~i~ .. W>IlUIIIU~r.~.u,~~a\,~M·:·'~r'lt IM~·~ 111111 Reception~: 750186 06/10/2008 10:27:22 AM Jean Alberico 1 of 2 Rec Fee:$11.00 Doc Fee:3.30 GARFIELD COUNTY CO SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED TIDS DEED, Made this _jfjf_ day of a~ ,2008 between CLOUGH SHEEP COMPANY, LLC, Grantor of the County of Garfield, Sta{t?Of Colorado and RYAN MCKENZIE, of the County of Garfield and State of Colorado, whose legal address is 400 East S'h Street, Rifle, CO 81650, of the County of Garfield, State of Co lorado, Grantee: WITNESSETH, That the Grantor for and in consideration of the sum ofTen Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained, sold and conveyed, and by these presents does grant, bargain, sell, convey and confirm, unto the Grantee, his heirs, successors and assigns forever, all the real property, together with improvements, if any, situate, lying and being in the County of Garfield, State of Colorado described as follows: SEE EXHIBIT A ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREiN BY THIS REF'ERENCE also known by street and number as: ---------------------- TOGETHER with all and singular the hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging, or in anywise appertaining, and the reversion and reversions, remainder and remainders, rents, issues and profits thereof, and all the estate, right, title, interest, claim and demand whatsoever of the Grantor, either in law or equi!J, of, in and to the above-bargained premises, with the hereditaments and appurtenances. ·. ·.~:· r<f HAVE AND TO HOLD the said premises above-bargained and described, with the appurten.ance·s, unto the Grantee, his heirs, successors and assigns forever. The Grantor, for itself, its succ~ssors and assigns, does covenant and agree that it shall and will WARRANT AND FOREVER DE,FEND the above-bargained premises in the quiet and peaceable possession of the Grantee, his heirs, successors and assigns, against all and every person or persons Claiming the whole or any part thereof, by, through or under the Grantor. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has executed this deed on the date set forth above. CLOUGH SHEEP COMPANY, LLC f STATEOFCOLORADO ) ) ss OF GARFIELD ) ;l~~~~~1gJt~:;'"l·~.in. strument was acknowledged before me this 5/f{ day or#..« ~ manager of Clough Sheep Company, LLC. 1 . (;/. . .. ,2007, EXHIBIT A APARCELOFLANDSITUATEDINSECTION80FTOWNSHIP6SOUTH,RANGE93WESTOFTHE6THPRINCIPALMERIDIAN BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT WHENCE THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 8 BEARS S68°45'53"W 947.58 FEET; THENCE N00°36'00"E 226.09 FEET: THENCE N04°22'02"E 342.26 FEET; THENCE 37.30 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT, WITH A RADIUS OF 20.04 FEET ANDA CHORD OF N48°56'39"W82.!4 FEET; THENCE I25.37 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT WITH A RADIUS OF 75.62 FEET AND CHORD OF N54°46'38'W I I 1.50 FEET; THENCE I23.86 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, WITH A RADIUS OF 609.33 FEET AND CHORD NOJ027'33"W I23.64 FEET; THENCE4I5.44FEETALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT WITH A RADIUS OF 506.80 FEETANDCHORDOFNI9°07'11 "W 403.91 FEET,· THENCENI6°56'29"W I63.26FEET; THENCEN00°47'08''W207.08FEET,· THENCE N24°'I0'28"W 402.89 FEET; THENCE NI2°29'09'W !40.47 FEET. THENCE S50°03'/l"E 239.94 FEET: THENCE S68°46'I7"E 249.92 FEET; THENCE S61 °46'5I "E 293,29 FEET; THENCE S29°I9'I3"E 793.21 FEET,· THENCE S43°06'IO"E 992.99 FEET; THENCE S00°00'00"E 226.08 FEET; THENCE S90°00'00"W 1274.27 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID PROPERTY CONTAINS 35. 043± ACRES AS DESCRIBED. COUNTY OF GARFIELD STATE OF COLORADO SUBJECT TO AND TOGETHER WITH A 50.00 FOOT ACCESS AND UTILITY EASEMENT A 50.00 FOOT ACCESS AND UTILITY EASEMENT SITUATED IN SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 92 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT BEING TEE CENTERLINE OF SAID 50.00 FOOT EASEMENT WHENCE THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 8 BEARS N89°40 '58 "W 958.48 FEET; THENCE ALONG SAID CENTERLINE THE FOLLOWING 8 COURSES AND DISTANCES; I) I22,40 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, WITH A RADIUS OF 128.9I FEET ANDA CHORD OF N26°36'04"W I 17.85 FEET; 2) N00°36'00"E 468.I6 FEET 3) N04° '23'02"E 34I.43 FEET; 4) 83.83 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT, WITH A RADIUS OF 45.04 FEET AND CHORD OF N48° .56'39"W 72.24 FEET,· 5) 83.92 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT WITH A RADIUS OF 50.62 FEET AND CHORD OF N54°46'38"W 74.64 FEET,· 6) 118.77 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, WITH A RADIUS OF 584.33 FEET AND CHORD OF NOJ027'33" WI 18.57 FEET; 7) 435.94 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT, WITH A RADIUS OF 531.80 FEET AND CHORD OF NJ9007'Il"W 423.83 FEET,· 8) 42°36 '13"W 163.15 FEET TO THE POINT OF TERMINATION. SAID EASEMENT TO BE 25.00 FEET EACH SIDE OF THE DESCRIBED CENTERLINE AND TO EXTEND OR TERMINATE AT THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 8. . . .. :.: ·: ' ' . ' -i :".I Division: Western Easement location: 1402 West 2nd St. Rifle, CO (Gas & Elec. Distr.) ROW Agent: Dennis Hansen Description Author: JSC, Inc. Author Address: Meeker. CO Doc. No.: 191833 J Plat/Grid No.: SW/4-Sec.8, T6S, R93W NW/4-Sec.17-T6S-R93W W.OJJ.OJCREG No.: PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO EASEMENT The undersigned Grantor hereby acknowledges receipt of good and valuable consideration from PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO (Company), 1225-17" Street, Denver, Colorado, 80202-5533, in consideration of which Grantor(s) hereby grants unto said Company, its successors and assigns, non-exclusive easement to construct, operate, maintain, repair, and replace utility lines and all fixtures and devices, used or useful in the operation of said lines, through, over, under, across, and along a course as said lines may be hereafter constructed in the SWX of Section 8 and the NWX of Section 17, Township 6 South, Range 93 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, County of Garfield, State of Colorado, the easement being described as follows: SEE EASEMENT DESCRIPTION ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF. THIS IS A CORRECTION TO AND SUPERSEDES THAT CERTAIN EASEMENT AS RECORDED JUNE 2, 2009, IN RECEPTION NUMBER 768906, OF THE GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO RECORDS TO CORRECT THE CHANGE IN THE EASEMENT DESCRIPTION IN THE SAID EASEMENT. The easement is Ten (10) feet in width. The side boundary lines of the easement shalt be lengthened and shortened as necessal)' to encompass a continuous strip of not less than the above width at aU points on Grantor's property crossed by the above described easement and extending to the boundaries of adjacent properties. Together with the right to enter upon said premises, to survey, construct, maintain, operate, repair, replace, control, and use said utility lines and related fixtures and devices, and to remove objects interfering therewith, including the trimming of trees and bushes, and together with the right to use so much of the adjoining premises of Grantor during surveying, construction, maintenance, repair, removal, or replacement of said utility lines and related fixtures and devices as may be required to permit the operation of standard utility construction or repair machinery. The Grantor reserves the right to use and occupy the easement tor any purpose consistent with the lights and privileges above granted and which will not interfere with or endanger any of the said Company's facilities therein or use thereof. Such reservations by the Grantor shall in no event include the right to erect or cause to be erected any buildings or structures upon the easement granted or to locate any mobile home or trailer units thereon. In case of the permanent abandonment of the easement, all right, privilege, and interest granted shall terminate. The work of installing and maintaining said lines and fixtures shall be done with care; the surface along the easement shall be restored substantially to its original level and condition. Signed this 13 day of August, 2009. STATE OF COLORADO ) )§ COUNTY OF GARFIELD ) GRANTOR: Clough Sheep Company, LLC, a Colorado Limited Liability Company By ~!<(.,.,_; <tJ ) v; ~b Genevieve Clough, Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 13th day of August, 2009, by: Genevieve Clough, as Manager of Clough Sheep Company, LLC, a Colorado Limited Liability Company. Version: 12/96 : 1!!1 ~~~~ ~:rlil'l.WI'.'I.ID'rlr,llti•LIIIA:rrli'IFJ\:111~.1-1~.~"!. IIIII Reception#: 773262 GB/1412009 02:43:41 PM Jean Alberico 2 of 3 Reo Fee:$16.0G Doc Fee:O.OO GARFlEL.D COUNTY CO CLOUGH/SNYDER· LYING IN THE SW'I. OF SECTION 8, AND THE NW'I. OF SECTION 17, T.6S., R.93W. OF THE 6TH P.M .. GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO. EASEMENT DESCRIPTION A 10 FOOT WIDE EASEMENT LYING 5 FEET ON EACH SIDE OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED CENTERLINE LYING IN THE SW'/, OF SECTION 8 AND THE NW'/, OF SECTION 17, T.6S., R.93W. OF THE 6TH P.M., GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 8 (COUNTY SURVEYOR BRASS CAP) WHSNCE THE SOUTH % CORNER (COUNTY SURVEYOR BRASS CAP) OF SAID SECTION 8, BEARS S89.40'56"E, 2629.18 FEET; THENCE S49.40 '16" E 2017.43 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF SAID CENTERLINE; THENCE N17.41'49"W, 68.39 FEET; THENCE N41.13'25"W, 12.20 FEET; THENCE N19.17'47"E, 7.15 FEET; THENCE N77'52'19"W, 30.39 FEET; THENCE N54.41'42"W, 69.06 FEET; THENCE N48.35'54"W, 36.67 FEET; THENCE N27.35'16"W, 127.34 FEET; THENCE N07.19'15"E, 124.53 FEET; THENCE N07.37'17"W, 91.80 FEET; THENCE NOZ057' 43"W, 64.32 FEET; THENCE N17.51'58"W, 51.96 FEET; THENCE NaO•a5'46"W, 714.62 FEET; THENCE N83.27'14"W, 102.89 FEET; THENCE N86'18'27"W, 384.23 FEET; THENCE N05.43'49"W, 169.76 FEET; THENCE N05'26'09"E, 322.51 FEET; THENCE N07.59'59"W, 49.70 FEET; THENCE N00'10'28"E, 95.88 FEET; THENCE N18.48'38"E, 94.72 FEET; THENCE N08•57'27"W, 183.64, FEET; THENCE N05'0f'58"E, 50.30 FEET; THENCE N22.51'03"W 64.52 FEET; THENCE N05.47'03"W 67.70 FEET; THENCE N01'08'15"E 152.36 FEET; THENCE N21.09'49"W 50.28 FEET; THENCE N33~11'38"W 78,22 FEET; THENCE N30.41'01"W 96.80 FEET; THENCE N28'18'50"W 58.76 FEET; THENCE N36.04'00"W 61.78 FEET; THENCE N44.57'29"W 99.81 FEET; THENCE N43.16'07"W 51.35 FEET; THENCE N40'14'37"W 70.09 FEET; THENCE N39'14'21"W 71.01 FEET; THENCE N41.05'55"W 141.57 FEET; THENCE N40.42'58"W 96.36 FEET; THENCE N48.09'13"W 50.88 FEET; THENCE N45.17'44"W 53.62 FEET; THENCE N60.24'04"W 15.08 FEET TO THE POINT OF TERMINUS OF SAID CENTERLINE, WHENCE THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION BEARS S39'43'27"W 1334.20 FEET. SAID EASEMENT CONTAINS 41,323 SQUARE FEET OR 0.949x ACRES MORE OR LESS AS DESCRIBED. ALSO, A 10 FOOT WIDE EASEMENT LYING 5 FEET ON EACH SIDE OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED CENTERLINE LYING IN THE SW'I. OF SECTION 8, T.6S., R93W. OF THE 6TH P.M .. GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 8 (COUNTY SURVEYOR BRASS CAP) WHENCE THE SOUTH V, CORNER (COUNTY SURVEYOR BRASS CAP} OF SAID SECTION 8, BEARS S89.40'56"E, 2629.18 FEET; THENCE N57'33'17"E 1074.62 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF SAID CENTERLINE; THENCE N11•oo'02W 183.36 FEET TO THE POINT OF TERMINUS OF SAID CENTERLINE, WHENCE THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION BEARS S49'03'10"W 1154.34 FEET. SAID EASEMENT CONTAINS 1,834 SQUARE FEET OR 0.042± ACRES MORE OR LESS AS DESCRIBED. ""'"""" -=>IW~ ... ..........., ... ~,...Jif!JSr<11W<I<CI: NII'UIW.--~---tJinlJSJ:UIWn' """"'._>OtiM" MUII .... n113TIIIDrDIU=n -.rr.. Jil 110 &<-. 11•r Nf JQIOitiJI.SU 0,..11""' t>D<a IN W/4 llt/Mt:r 1)11 t;tniJJbJ<# MIU fiWI ru I'OltliO """' Tllll ~-,. filS CJJ!III'.mt:nJOJ( 8_, - PROJ. NO. CWUCH 06113 DWC. 06113_XL oll sunv._,r ,.;..~ i "'%, $j ~ " -< 128 WE 3 STREET RIFL 0. 81650 625-,1,9 ~-4700 li:l fi~';o~:lllill.1,\~.~·~~ll!'•llliii1Sr(,IIV.I-I\o:W~I'IIU-4 IIIII Reception#: 773262 08114/2009 S2:43:41 PM Jean Alberico 3 of 3 Rec Fee:$16.00 Doc Fee:9.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO CLOUGH/SNYDER. LY/Nr; IN THE Sif1A OF SECTION 8, AND THE NWI4 OF SECTION 17, T.6S., R.93W. OF THE 6TH P.M., GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO. I S6()"24'04~E 16.08' S45"17'4)~e 53.82' \ S4tr09'13"E 50.88' \ S40"42'5trE 96.36' \ S4r05'55'' E 141.57; 539'14'21"£ 7i-%•u 'ST' E 70.09. Nt8'48'38"E OWNER: 94. 72' DAN LEE SNYDER .!'c LORI CHERI SNYDER BOOK 1849 PACE 620 S4~_$"frE s-u;g_~rrs sss•o4 ·oo~ E 61.78' szs-,s·so~s 58.75' S30'41'01"E 96.80' S33"tt'SIJ''E 78,22' 521'09'49"£ 50.28' S01"08'1S'W 152.86' S05'47'03''E 67.70' $22"51'03"£ 64.52' SOS"'t'SB''W 50.80' N11"00'0Z'W 183.36' OWNER: CLOUGH SHEEP COMPANY. LLC. REC. NO. 734551 S<l5"21'5f"IY 99.53' S86't8'2rE S83"b't-re 384·2 3' 102.89' 2 29.18' SEC. B ( IN FEET ) inch "" 300 ft. ~ -IICTO.,.._...,...,/l!'Jn't:oliiWICil AJIT ""''.tor/ON 4UU UP<>II AN'f OUrr:t' Ill nntl SIIO:'U rtrtm~ TIUIU rs.o• onu, ><V '"'" -ZIIZI> "'- ..UI<!r. IN ... ~-. ••Y U .,_ Al>UUf'OII ut /J&I'I1:r'I./IYRrJIIlJIOVRI#<'O./I~-7tWimo'Y~ ,_ 111~ Inn "' ..... <+RnfK4170./I !f/tor./1 --" tl SURV.e;-0<,',.~0 ' "~ ~ ~ " "' 128 WE 3 /)STREET RlFL 0. 81650 625-rf r 9 f4700 OWNER: VIRJC!NA LEE IWN'tAN BOOK 405 PACE 514 ~ ,o ~~ ~~~ ill[ ~ ~, ~I SEC. 17 CTY. SURVEYOR BRASS CAP OWNER: CWUGH SHEEP COMPANY. LLC. REC. NO. '13<f551 ' i str;r~~IJ" E SECTION LINE PER SECTION l SURVEY PROJ NO. CWUCH 06113 DWC. 06113_XL S07"37'17"E 91.80' S07*19'15WW 124.53' S2'r35'16ME 127.34' S4£r35'54"E 86.67' S54'41'42"E s$f;Sfl9" e 30.89' St9'1"1'4r'K '1.15' S41't3'25"E 12.20' Sl"''l/1'49"£ 68.39' Ill/ ~·r~~~~~~W•:IIII<r.IHLIIr.riV.Iof.f,;[\f~l!.~ ~"l IIIII Reception#: 775327 09f18/2009 02:30:01 PM Jean Alberico 1 of 3 Rao Fee:$21.00 Ooc Fee:e.€10 G?.RFIELO COUNTY CO Division: Western Doc. No.: 191831 J Easement Location: 1404 West 200 St. Rifle, CO (Gas & Elec. Distr.) ROW Agent: Dennis Hansen Description Author: JSC, Inc. Author Address: Meeker, co Plat/Grid No.: SW!4-Sec.8, T6S, R93W W.OJJ.OJCREG No.: PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO EASEMENT The undersigned Grantor hereby acknowledges receipt of good and valuable consideration from PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO (Company), 1225-17ttt Street, Denver, Colorado, 80202-5533, in consideration of which Grantor(s) hereby grants unto said Company, its successors and assigns, non-exclusive easement to construct, operate, maintain, repair, and replace utility lines and all fixtures and devices, used or useful in the operation of said lines, through, over, under, across, and along a course as said lines may be hereafter constructed in the SWX of Section 8, Township 6 South, Range 93 West of the 6111 Principal Meridian, County of Garfield, State of Colorado, the easement being described as follows: SEE EASEMENT DESCRIPTION ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF. THIS IS A CORRECTION TO AND SUPERSEDES THAT CERTAIN EASEMENT AS RECORDED JUNE 2, 2009, IN RECEPTION NUMBER 768908, OF THE GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO RECORDS TO CORRECT THE CHANGE IN THE EASEMENT DESCRIPTION IN THE SAID EASEMENT. The easement is Te[l (10) feet in width. The side boundary lines of the easement shall be lengthened and shortened as necessary to encompass a continuous strip of not Jess than the above width at all points on Grantor's property crossed by the above described easement and extending to the boundaries of adjacent properties. Together with the right to enter upon said premises, to survey, construct, maintain, operate, repair, replace, control, and use said utility lines and related fixtures and devices, and to remove objects interfering therewith, including the trimming of trees and bushes, and together with the right to use so much of the adjoining premises of Grantor during swveying, construction, maintenance, repair, removal, or replacement of said utility lines and related fixtures and devices as may be required to permit the operation of standard utility construction or repair machinery. The Grantor reserves the right to use and occupy the easement for any purpose consistent with the rights and privileges above granted and which will not interfere with or endanger any of the said Company's facilities therein or use thereof. Such reseiVations by the Grantor shall in no event include the right to erect or cause to be erected any buildings or structures upon the easement granted or to locate any mobile home or trailer units thereon. In case of the permanent abandonment of the easement, all right, privilege, and interest granted shall terminate. The work of installing and maintaining said lines and fixtures shall be done with care; the surface along the easement shall be restored substantia!ly to its original level and condition. Signed this Jfj.fV day of August, 2009. STATE OF COLORADO ) ) § COUNTY OF GARFIELD ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ~lc;3t;t.,h __ day of August, 2009, by: Danny Lee Snyder and Lori Cheri Snyder. Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires: RETURN TO: Dennis Hansen P.O. Box 4245 Grand Junction. C.O R 1 'lO? Version: 12196 c ' ., 1111 ~Yfo~o F~'M'i,\'lll tlrltHI'.Irr-:rtll(.lllf~lifr,I!IU·~ IIIII Reception#: 775327 99/1S/2009 02:30:01 PM Jean Rlberico 2 of 3 Rec Fee:$21.00 Doc Fee:0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO CLOUGH/SNYDER LYING IN THE SWV. OF SECTION 8, AND THE NW';, OF SECTION 17, T.6S., R.93W. OF THE 6TH P.M., GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO. EASEMENT DESCRIPTION A 10 FOOT WIDE EASEMENT LYING 5 FEET ON EACH SIDE OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED CENTERLINE LYING IN THE SW'/, OF SECTION 8 AND THE NW'!, OF SECTION 17, T.6S., R.93W. OF THE 6TH P.M .. GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 8 (COUNTY SURVEYOR BRASS CAP) WHENCE THE SOUTH it, CORNER (COUNTY SURVEYOR BRASS CAP) OF SAID SECTION 8, BEARS S89'40'56"E, 2629.18 FEET: THENCE S49'40 '16" E 2017.43 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF SAID · CENTERLINE; THENCE N17'4(49"W, 68.39 FEET; THENCE N41'13'25"W, 12.20 FEET; THENCE N19'17'47"E, 7.15 FEET; THENCE N77'52'19"W, 30.39 FEET; THENCE N54'41'4Z"W, 69.06 FEET; THENCE N48'35'54"W, 36.67 FEET; THENCE NZ7'35'16"W, 127.34 FEET; THENCE N07'19'15"E, 124.53 FEET; THENCE N07'37'17"W, 91.80 FEET; THENCE NOZ"57'43"W, 64.32 FEET; THENCE N17'51'58"W, 51.96 FEET; THENCE N00'05'46"W, 714.62 FEET; THENCE N83'Z7'14"W, 102.89 FEET; THENCE NB6'18'27"W, 384.23 FEET; THENCE N05'43'49"W, 169.76 FEET; THENCE N05'Z6'09"E, 322.51 FEET; THENCE N07'59'59"W, 49.70 FEET; THENCE N00'10'2B"E, 95.88 FEET; THENCE N18'48'3B"E, 94.72 FEET; THENCE N08'57'27"W, 183.64, FEET; THENCE N05'01'58"E, 50.30 FEET; THENCE NZZ"51'03"W 64.52 FEET; THENCE N05'47'03"W 67.70 FEET; THENCE N01'08'15"E 152.36 FEET; THENCE NZ1'09'49"W 50.28 FEET; THENCE N33'11'3B"W 78,22 FEET; THENCE N30'41'01"W 96.80 FEET; THENCE NZ8'18'50"W 58.76 FEET; THENCE N36'04'00"W 61.78 FEET; THENCE N44'57'29"W 99.81 FEET; THENCE N43'16'07"W 51.35 FEET; THENCE N40'14'37"W 70.09 FEET; THENCE N39'14'21"W 71.01 FEET; THENCE N41'05'55"W 141.57 FEET; THENCE N40'42'58"W 96.36 FEET; THENCE N48'09'13"W 50.88 FEET; THENCE N45'17'44"W 53.62 FEET; THENCE N60'24'04"W 15.08 FEET TO THE POINT OF TERMINUS OF SAID CENTERLINE, WHENCE THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION BEARS S39'43'27"W 1334.20 FEET. SAID EASEMENT CONTAINS 41,323 SQUARE FEET OR 0.949± ACRES MORE OR LESS AS DESCRIBED. ALSO, A 10 FOOT WIDE EASEMENT LYING 5 FEET ON EACH SIDE OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED CENTERLINE LYING IN THE SW'/, OF SECTION 8, T.6S., R93W. OF THE 6TH P.M., GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY. DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 8 (COUNTY SURVEYOR BRASS CAP) WHENCE THE SOUTH V, CORNER (COUNTY SURVEYOR BRASS CAP} OF SAID SECTION 8, BEARS S89'40'56"E, 2629.18 FEET; THENCE N57'33'17"E 1074.62 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF SAID CENTERLINE; THENCE N11'00'0ZW 183.36 FEET TO THE POINT OF TERMINUS OF SAID CENTERLINE, WHENCE THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION BEARS S49'03'10"W 1154.34 FEET. SAID EASEMENT CONTAINS 1,834 SQUARE FEET OR 0.042± ACRES MORE OR LESS AS DESCRIBED. PROJ. NO. CLOUGH 06113 DWC. 06113_XL ~O~ SURVe;- 0<,'> & C'~ !'» .,. ~ ~ 128 WE. 3D STREET RIFL 0. 81650 625-r119 ,-4700 IIIIIJI'•'o~.~:l'lll'i,\1/IJ IIIII l!!l.il.lri~'fillltiWI~rt!U·Y. IIIII Reception#; 775327 e9/18/2S~9 1<12:30:01 PM Jean Fllberico 3 of 3 Reo f'ee:$21.00 Dec Fee.0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CC CLOUGH/SNYDER LYING IN THE SW14 OF SECTION 8, AND THE NW14 OF SECTION 1'1, T.BS., R.93W. OF THE 6TH P.M .• GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO. I SG0'24'04''E 15.08' S45"t7'4}ffE 53.62' \ $48"09'13''£ 50.88' \ 40'Jf2'5B"E 96.36' \ S4r05'55"E 141.57; S3!r14'2f'E 7~~~•14 '3'1~ E 70.~·· S4~f$'f?"E s"~f~p~s OWNER: Nllr48'38"E 94.72' DAN LEE SNYDER k LORI CHERI SNYDER BOOK 1849 PAOE 620 S36"0<t'oo~e 61.78' S28'18'50ffE 58.76' sso•.wore 96.80' S83'11'38 .. E 78.22' S2r09'49"E 50.28' l! <.; c;: ~ ~ ~-:i soroa'ts·w 152.36' S05'47'08''E 67.70' S22"5t'03''E 64.52' 805"01'58''1( 50.30' NWOO'OZ''II' 183.36' OWNER: CLOUGH SHEEP COMPANY, Ll.C. R£C. NO. 734551 SO'r59'59 .. E 49.'10' S45'21'51"W 99.53' '" S66'18'27'E s83027 •14 ~E SB-t.zs· 102.89' 29.18' SEC. 8 ( IN FEET ) inch "" 300 ft. OWNER: VJRJOINA LEE RUNYAN BOOK 405 PAGE 514 S02"57'4TE 64.32' SECTION LINE ~ ~~ ~-1:..·~ ·I ~ "I PER SECTION l SURVEY PROJ NO. CLOUGH 06113 DWG. 06113_XL SEC. 17 CTY. SURVEYOR BRASS C.AP OWNER.• CLOUGH SHEEP COMPANY. LU:. REC. NO. 734551 S4fr35'54"E 36.67' ss~~~fT' S'l'r52'19"E 30.39' S19"17'47"W 7.15' 841"13'25"£ 12,20' S1'r4t '49" E 68.39' llli'W~oi'~'II!JMa•Ji,~f lfi,Lill~:ln,"o+gllfiCI-fiL~"lll! IIi Reception~: 768907 06/02/2009 02:46:46 PM Jean Alberico 1 or S Reo Fee:$21.00 Doc Fee:0.00 GARFIELD COU~iT'I CO Division: Western Easement Location: 1404 West 200 St. Rifle, CO (Eiec. Distr.) ROW Agent: Dennis Hansen Description Author. JSC, Inc. Author Address: Meeker, CO Doc. No.: 191832 E Plat/Grid No.: SW/4-Sec.8, T6S, R93W W.O./J.O.fCREG No.: PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO EASEMENT The undersigned Grantor hereby acknowledges receipt of good and valuable consideration from PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO (Company), 1225-171h Street, Denver, Colorado, 80202-5533, in consideration of which Grantor(s) hereby grants unto said Company, its successors and assigns, non-exclusive easement to construct, operate, maintain, repair, and replace utility lines and all fixtures and devices, used or useful in the operation of said lines, through, over, under, across, and along a course as said lines may be hereafter constructed in the SWX of Section 8, Township 6 South, Range 93 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, County of Garfield, State of Colorado, the easement being described a~ follows: SEE EASEMENT DESCRIPTION ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF. The easement is Ten (10) feet in width. The side boundary lines of the easement shall be lengthened and shortened as necessary to encompass a continuous strip of not less than the above width at all points on Grantor's property crossed by the above described easement and extending to the boundaries of adjacent properties. Together with the right to enter upon said premises, to survey, construct, maintain, operate, repair, replace, control, and use said utility lines and related fixtures and devices, and to remove objects interfering therewith, including the trimming of trees and bushes, and together with the right to use so much of the adjoining premises of Grantor during surveying, construction, maintenance, repair, removal, or replacement of said utiltty lines and related fixtures and devices as niay be required to permit the operation of standard utility construction or repair machinery. The Grantor reserves the right to use and occupy the easement for any purpose consistent with the rights and privileges above granted and which will not interfere with or endanger any of the said Company's facilities therein or use thereof. Such reservations by the Grantor shall in no event include the right to erect or cause to be erected any buildings or structures upon the easement granted or to locate any mobile home or trailer units thereon. J n case of the permanent abandonment of the easement, all right, privilege, and interest granted shall terminate. The work of instaJJing and maintaining said lines and fixtures shall be done with care; the sutface along the easement shall be restored substantially to its original level and condition. Signed this ;)Jf1--' day of May, 2009. STATE OF COLORADO ) ) § COUNTY OF GARFIELD ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 27th Danny Lee Snyder and Lori Cheri Snyder. RETURN TO: Dennis Hansen P.O. Box 4245 ('() Rl "\0?. day of May. 2009. by: Version: 12/96 PH-970-878-5292 JSC, INC. P.O. BOX 1153 MEEKER, CO 81641 EASEMENT DESCRIPTION FAX-970-878-5392 A 10 FOOT WIDE EASEMENT LYING 5 FEET ON EACH SIDE OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED CENTERLINE LYING IN THE SWI/4 OF SECTION 8, T6S, R93W OF THE 6TH P.M., GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 8 (COUNTY SURVEYOR BRASS CAP) WHENCE THE SOUTH 1/4 CORNER (COUNTY SURVEYOR BRASS CAP) OF SAID SECTION 8, BEARS S89°40'56"E, 2629.18 FEET; THENCE N53°57'06"E, 1102.90 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF A PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN BOOK 1849 PAGE 620 IN THE OFFICE OF THE GARFIELD COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER, SAID POINT BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF SAID CENTERLINE; THENCE N10"04'42"W, 242.69 FEET TO THE POINT OF TERMINUS OF SAID CENTERLINE. SAID EASEMENT CONTAINS 2,426.85 SQUARE FEET OR 0.06 ACRES MORE OR LESS. 1111 Wl.l'"lf'ii,JIIJI,Itl'. 1"'•1 Hrt:!r\(l!l~'l!tl:l+l~~·~ 1911!1 Re~eptiQn~: 768907 06!02!2609 02:116:45 PM Jean Alberico 3 of 3 Rec Pee:$21.00 Dec Fee:0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY SNYDER l YlNG IN THE SWl/4 OF SECTION 8, AND THE NW1/4 OF SECTION 17, T6S, R93W OF THE 6TH P.M. so 100 SCALE; 1" = 1 00' fl Xcel Energy·· GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO (atAAO<G ~<SQ ~ll:r.>.>a-· -- PUIHfC 5£/I.V/CE COMI'/I.NY 1 EXISTING ;-EASEMENT ' ' ' ' ' iN10'04'42"W 242.59' ' SEC 8 '" 5-26-2009 m 1'888-232 No. __________ ~11~0~2~5 --~ Assessor's Parcel No. ______ .....~Iu.Bu.Dt....__ __ _ Date 7/21/2008 BUILDING PERMIT CARD JobAddress ----~w~e~s~t ~2~nd~S~t ~R~if~le~------------------------------------------------ Owner ________ _;M=cK:....:.e=n=z=ie:.L,-'-'R::..r..v=an:.:.._ _________ Address 400 e. 5th St, Rifle Phone # 366 -2090 Phone # 904-2480 Contractor Raz Construction Address Box 695 Gypsum Setbacks : Front _________ Rear _________ RH ________ LH ________ Zoning ________ _ s/f on finished base w/open S cov patios S att gar age 1 Soi Is Test --::,-------:=-..,...,.,..,...,.--- Footing 7-Z-z..-e>?l.???Q >f Foundation !J-5=o8 :;?(¥/ Grout _________ ~=-~,---~- Underground Plumbin9.. <fi';-/1-.-oZ' Rough Plumbin~ ~ i~:;!~i~n ff:_f;PJiic;iw Roofing - Drywall 0< "' 17~!:?9 ~ Gas Piping /-Z-r;, -cJ-fi?t:().. * /(J~S/o r l3As£'. w A t t 8~1/-PB '7tU ~6/.eH~ JetA. a( J9.-yK_jfi.Jt.~tJ8' /Pnt- P~I<c/l W A LLS /0-Z I -&1)8 7(eV_ INSPECTIONS Weatherproofing ____________ _ Mechanical ______ -..----=-----:;;;oo:,----,...---- Eiectrical Rough (State) J -3-oCf &/ Electrical Final (State) ________ q-=---- FiRal /Checklist Completed? ___ _ Certificate Occupancy # _________ _ Date-,-.,.,--.....,...,..--~:------------- Septic System # 9 Lt 3-1.\ 1f"V\~ Date "J..-';p\--6~ Final ______________________ _ Other _________________ __ NOTES (continue on back) COUNTY OF GARFIELD -BUILDING D E PARTMENT CORRECTION NOTICE 108 8th St., Suite 401 G l enwood S prings, Colorado Phone (970} 945-8212 Job located at -L/::........:'4-z::.__::O::::::._Cfc______l(.L!.~L-.Z..._~ _2-=.,.t[£LL.L...!.fl2=----- Pe rmit No. 7 /,/0 Z .::;:--- 1 h ave this day ins pected this structure a nd t h ese premis es and found the following correction s n ee d e d: 0 Call for Re-l n spection 0 $50 .00 Re -lns p ectio n Fee must b e paid prior t o Re-lns p ection You are h ereby n otified that the above c o r r ection must be ins p ected b ef o r e c overi ng. When correction(s) have been made, call for in spection at 970-3 84-5003. Date 7-Z---z_ 20 ~ Building Ins pector ~ a P h one (970} 945-82 1 2 COUNTY OF GARFIELD -B UILDIN G D EPARTM E NT CORRECTION NOTICE 108 8th St., Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado Phone (970) 945-8212 Job located at t:<./C.S r-Z. #O Permit No. /1 t? Z: s-- 1 have this day inspected this structure and these premises and found the following corrections needed: V~/111 /f/ic;;t;[Z ll!e/laJ tiP 2(/4 9/G~ s t/ #L.Y' A/a; r- 0 Call for Re-lnspection 0 $50.00 Re-lnspection Fee must be paid prior to Re-lnspection You are her eby notif i ed that the above correction must be inspected before covering. When correction(s) have been made, call for i nspec tion at 970 -384-5003. Dat e /-Z-t;. 2 20 t& 7 Building lnspect o r p ~ Pho ne (970} 945-8212 R043684 217708300535 SNYDER, DANNY LEE & LORI CHERI PO BOX 392, RIFLE, CO, 81650 1404 W 2ND ST, RIFLE Section: 8 Township: 6 Range: 93 A PCL OF LAND SITUATED IN SEC 7 & 8 CONT 35.405 AC. 021 Account: Parcel: Owner Name: Owner Address: Property Address: Subdivision: Legal: Tax Area: Date Deed Type Doc Number Grantor Grantee Amount 07/11/2006 SWD 702317 CLOUGH, W.F.SNYDER, DANNY LEE & LORI ...1,200 Sales Information Year Land Actual Imp Actual Total Actual Land Assessed Imp Assessed Total Assessed 2012 16,750 429,760 446,510 4,860 34,210 39,070 2011 16,750 429,760 446,510 4,860 34,210 39,070 Taxable Values History Model Attribute Name Attribute Value LAND 0 ABSTRACT_CODE IRRIGATED LAND-AGRICLTRL. AREA_ACRES 35.405 AREA_SQFT 0 NEIGHBORHOOD TAUGHENBAUGH MESA - AG AG Property Details Account Information Garfield County Assessor Data Site Jim Yellico, 109 8th Street, Glenwood Springs, CO, 81601 (P) 970.945.9134 | (F) 970.945.3953 | (E) jyellico@garfield-county.com Model Attribute Name Attribute Value RESI 0 ABSTRACT_CODE FARM/RANCH RESIDENCE-IMPS BUILDING_TYPE FARM/RANCH UNITS 1 ACT_YEAR_BLT 2006 BASEMENTAREA 0 HEATEDAREA 4148 FINBSMTAREA 669 BATHS 4 CONST_QUAL GOOD ARCH_STYLE 1-STORY BEDROOMS 5 AREA_UNITS 1 NEIGHBORHOOD TAUGHEBAUGH MESA - AG ROOMS 8 FRAME WOOD FRAME AIRCOND CENTRAL HEATING_FUEL SOLAR HEATING_TYPE HT WTR RAD ROOF_COVER COMP SHNGL ROOF_STRUCTUR RIDGE FRME STORIES 1 XFOB 0 ABSTRACT_CODE FARM/RANCH RESIDENCE-IMPS BUILDING_NO 1 ACT_YEAR_BLT 2006 XFOB_CODE GARAGE 577-863 SF NEIGHBORHOOD TAUGHENBAUGH MESA - AG AREA_UNITS 0 XFOB 1 BUILDING_NO 1 ABSTRACT_CODE FARM/RANCH RESIDENCE-IMPS ACT_YEAR_BLT 2006 XFOB_CODE OPEN PORCH 251+ SF NEIGHBORHOOD TAUGHENBAUGH MESA - AG AREA_UNITS 0 XFOB 2 BUILDING_NO 1 ABSTRACT_CODE FARM/RANCH RESIDENCE-IMPS ACT_YEAR_BLT 2006 XFOB_CODE PATIO/CONC 101-250 SF NEIGHBORHOOD TAUGHENBAUGH MESA - AG AREA_UNITS 0 Garfield County Assessor Data Site Jim Yellico, 109 8th Street, Glenwood Springs, CO, 81601 (P) 970.945.9134 | (F) 970.945.3953 | (E) jyellico@garfield-county.com Model Attribute Name Attribute Value XFOB 3 BUILDING_NO 1 ABSTRACT_CODE FARM/RANCH RESIDENCE-IMPS ACT_YEAR_BLT 2006 XFOB_CODE SHED GOOD QUALITY NEIGHBORHOOD TAUGHENBAUGH MESA - AG AREA_UNITS 0 XFOB 4 BUILDING_NO 1 ABSTRACT_CODE FARM/RANCH RESIDENCE-IMPS ACT_YEAR_BLT 2006 NEIGHBORHOOD TAUGHENBAUGH MESA - AG XFOB_CODE GARAGE 1152+ SF AREA_UNITS 0 Property Images Garfield County Assessor Data Site Jim Yellico, 109 8th Street, Glenwood Springs, CO, 81601 (P) 970.945.9134 | (F) 970.945.3953 | (E) jyellico@garfield-county.com ~tech liq\1• "' I \\ld I I I ol lo • • ' l •I I I ,, ' I I : I l• ,, ,, I 'I oil.!· 1 I I I J. •Ill '• oJ; -"" HEPWORTH PAWLAI< GEOTECHN ICAL I " 1;, •-J'i ~ l'i4 1111 " "' ~ ttl,, h h " SUBSOIL STUDY AND PERCOLATION TESTS PROPOSED McKINZIE RESIDENCE 35 ACRE PARCEL, CLOUGH PROPERTY PRE FONTAINE MESA, WEST OF RIFLE 1404 WEST 2ND STREET GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO JOB NO. 108 151A APRlL 30, 2008 PREPARED FOR: RYAN McKINZIE C/0 RAZ CONSTRUCTION ATTN: RICO ZAMORA P .O. BOX 695 GYPSUM, COLORADO 81637 . ' TABLE OF CONTENTS PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY ........................................................................ -I - PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ................................................................................. - I - SITE CONDITIONS ................................................................................................... -2- FIELD EXPLORATION ............................................................................................ - 2 - SUB SURF ACE CONDITIONS .................................................................................. - 3 - FOUNDATION BEARING CONDITIONS ............................................................... -4- DES! GN RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................. -5 - STRAIGHT-SHAFT DRILLED PIERS .................................................................. -5- SPREAD FOOTINGS OR REINFORCED MAT FOUNDATIONS ....................... -6- FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS ......................................................... -7- NON-STRUCTURAL FLOOR SLABS .................................................................. -9- UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM ...................................................................................... -9- SURF ACE DRAINAGE ....................................................................................... -I 0 - PERCOLATION TESTING .................................................................................. -II - LIMITATIONS ........................................................................................................ -II - FIGURE I -LOCATIONS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS AND PERCOLATION TEST FIGURE 2 -LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS AND PROFILE PIT FIGURE 3 -LEGEND AND NOTES FIGURES 4 and 5 -SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS FIGURE 6-HYDROMETER ANALYSIS RESULTS TABLE I-SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS TABLE 2-PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY This report presents the results of a subsoil study and percolation tests fur the proposed McKinzie residence to be located on a 35 acre parcel at the Clough property, Prefontaine Mesa, west of Rifle, 1404 West 2"d Street, Garfield County, Colorado. The project site is shown on Figure I. The purpose of the study was to develop recommendations for the foundation and septic disposal designs. The study was conducted in accordance with our agreement for geotechnical engineering services to Ryan McKinzie c/o RAZ Construction dated April 9, 2008. A field exploration program consisting of exploratmy borings and percolation tests were conducted to obtain infOrmation on the subsurface conditions and soil infiltration rates. Samples of the subsoils and bedrock obtained during the field exploration were tested in the laboratory to determine their classification, compressibility or swell and other engineering characteristics. The results of the field exploration and laboratory testing were analyzed to develop recommendations for foundation types, depths and allowable pressures for the proposed residence foundation. The infiltration rates obtained from the percolation tests were analyzed to develop recommendations for septic disposal design. This repmi summarizes the data obtained during this study and presents our conclusions, design recommendations and other geotechnical engineering considerations based on the proposed construction and the subsurface conditions encountered. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION The proposed residence will consist of two stories of wood frame construction over a full basement level with an attached garage at the main level. The new residence will be located in roughly the same footprint as the existing residence which will be removed prior to the new construction. Basement and garage floors will be slab-on-grade. Grading for the residence is assumed to be relatively minor with cut depths between about 3 to 9 feet. We assume relatively light foundation loadings, typical ofthe proposed type Job No. 108 ISlA ~tech -2- of construction. The septic disposal area is currently planned to be located south (downhill) of the proposed residence. If proposed building or septic locations, foundation loadings or grading plans change significantly fi·om those described above, we should be notified to re-evaluate the recommendations contained in this report. SITE CONDITIONS The project site is located just west of the Rifle city limits in existing ranch/pasture land on Prefontaine Mesa, north of2"d Street and west of the Rifle By-Pass. The proposed building area is occupied by an existing residence as shown on Figure I. An existing gravel road accesses the site from 2"d Street to the south. The overall topography of the area consists of gently rolling terrain. The existing residence is located at the peak of a small, broad knoll with relatively flat, gentle side slopes. Vegetation consists of grass and weeds with scattered mature willow trees. FIELD EXPLORATION The field exploration for the project was conducted on April 16,2008. Two exploratory borings were drilled in the area of the proposed residence and one exploratory pit was excavated in the proposed septic disposal area as shown on Figure I to evaluate the subsurface conditions. The borings were advanced with 4-inch diameter continuous flight augers powered by a truck-mounted CME-45B drill rig. The pit was excavated with a Kobelco ED I 50 Bladerunner excavator. The borings and pit were logged by a representative of Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. and checked for groundwater level. Samples of the subsoils in the borings were taken with a 2 inch !.D. spoon sampler. The sampler was driven into the subsoils at various depths with blows from a I 40 pound hammer falling 30 inches. This test is similar to the standard penetration test described Job No. 108 ISlA -3- by ASTM Method D-1586. The penetration resistance values are an indication of the relative density or consistency of the subsoils and hardness ofthe bedrock. Samples of the subsoils in the profile pit were taken with relatively undisturbed and disturbed sampling methods. Depths at which the samples were taken and the penetration resistance values are shown on the Logs of Exploratory Borings and Profile Pit, Figure 2. The samples were returned to our laboratory for review by the project engineer and testing. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Graphic logs of the subsurface conditions encountered at the site are shown on Figure 2. The subsoils, below about I fuot of topsoil, generally consist of medium stiffto stiff, sandy clayey silt overlying stiff to very stiff, sandy clay. Weathered to hard claystone/siltstone bedrock (Wasatch Formation) was encountered in the borings at depths of I 2 and 19 feet below the existing ground surface. Laboratory testing perfonned on samples obtained fi'om the borings included natural moisture content, density, percent finer than No. 200 sieve (silt and clay fi·action) gradation analyses and hydrometer analysis. Results of swell-consolidation testing performed on relatively undisturbed drive samples are presented on Figures 4 and 5. The silt soils typically showed low to moderate compressibility under conditions of loading and wetting. One of the samples showed a minor collapse potential (settlement under constant load) after wetting. Samples of the clay soil and weathered bedrock showed a low to moderate expansion potential after wetting with swell pressures of6,000 psfand 3,000 psf, respectively. The results of the hydrometer analysis performed on small bulk sample fi·om the profile pit are shown on Figure 6. The laborat01y testing is summarized in Table 1. No fi·ee water was encountered in the borings at the time of drilling or when checked I day later. The subsoils and bedrock were slightly moist to moist. .lob No. 108 !51 A -4- FOUNDATION BEARING CONDITIONS The subsoils encountered at the site generally consist of sandy silt to sandy clay overlying Wasatch Formation bedrock. The overlying soils possess a variable settlement/heave potential with the upper silt being compressible under loading and the deeper clay possessing an expansion potential when wetted. The bedrock encountered below the soils at depths of 12 and 18 feet also possesses a low expansion potential when wetted. Shallow foundations systems placed on the upper soils and bedrock can experience differential movement causing structural distress if the soils or bedrock is subjected to changes in moisture content. A low risk alternative to limit the potential for differential foundation movement is to use a deep foundation system, such as straight-shaft drilled piers, to penetrate the upper variable soils and place the bearing level of the fuundation in a zone of relatively stable moisture conditions. It addition, piers make it possible to load the foundation sufficiently to resist potential uplift movements. Using a pier foundation, each column is supported on a single drilled pier and the building walls are founded on grade beams supported by a series of piers. Loads applied to the piers are transmitted to the bedrock partially through peripheral shear stresses and pmtially through end bearing pressure. In addition to their ability to reduce differential movements, piers have the advantage of providing relatively high supporting capacity. We should be contacted if an alternative deep foundation system is proposed. Recommendations for a straight-shaft drilled pier foundation are provided below. As an alternative, spread footings or a reinforced mat foundation could be used to suppmt the proposed residence provided that the risk of differential foundation movement is acceptable to the owner. Due to the variable settlement/heave potential between the proposed bearing levels, the risk of differential foundation movement should be fiuther evaluated at the time of constmction. It is possible that the foundation will need to be designed with a minimum dead load pressure to resist potential uplift pressures. Job No. 108151A -5 - Adjusting the footing depths to provide a uniform bea ring level also could help to reduce the differential movement potential. Recommendations for spread footing foundations are provided below. DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS STRAIGHT-SHAFT DRILLED PIERS The design and consttuction criteria presented below should be observed for a st raight- shaft drilled pier foundation system: l) The piers should be de signed for an allowable end bearing pressure of 30,000 psf and an allowable skin ihction value of 3,000 psf tor that p01tion ofthe pier in bedrock. 2) Uplift on the piers fi·om structural loading can be resisted by utilizing 75% ofthe allowable skin friction value plus an allowance for th e weight ofthe pier. 3) A minimum penetration of 5 feet into the bedrock and a minimum pier length of 15 feet are recommended . 4) Pi ers should be designed to resist lateral load s assuming a modulus of horizontal sub grade reaction of 50 tcf in the clay soils and a modulus of horizon tal subgrade reaction of 150 tcfin the bedrock. The modulu s valu es given are for a long , I foot wide pier an d must be corrected for pi er size. 5) Pi ers should be reinforced their full length with one #5 reinforcing rod for each 16 inches of pier per imeter to resist tension created by the swelling materials. 6) A 4 inch void form should be provided beneath grade bea ms to preven t the swe lling so il and rock fi·o m exerting uplift forces on the grade bea ms and to concentrate pier load ing s. A void form should also be provided beneath pt er caps. Job No. 108 ISlA ~tech -6- 7) Concrete utilized in the piers should be a fluid mix with sufficient slump so that concrete will fill the void between the reinforcing steel and the pier hole. 8) Pier holes should be properly cleaned prior to the placement of concrete. The drilling contractor should mobilize equipment of sufficient size to effectively drill through possible cemented bedrock zones. 9) Although free water was not encountered in the borings drilled at the site, some seepage in the pier holes may be encountered during drilling. Dewatering equipment may be required to reduce water infiltration into the pier holes. If water cannot be removed prior to placement of concrete, the tremie method should be used after the hole has been cleaned of spoil. In no case should concrete be placed in more than 3 inches of water. 1 0) Care should be taken to prevent the forming of mushroom-shaped tops of the piers which can increase uplift force on the piers fi·om swelling soils. II) A representative of the geotechnical engineer should observe pier drilling operations on a full-time basis. SPREAD FOOTINGS OR REINFORCED MAT FOUNDATIONS The design and construction criteria presented below should be obse1ved for a spread footing or reinforced mat foundation system. I) Footings or mats placed on the undisturbed natural soils should be designed for an allowable bearing pressure of2,000 psf. Based on experience, we expect initial settlement of footings designed and constructed as discussed in this section will be up to I inch. Additional differential foundation movement across the residence on the order of about 1 to 2 inches is possible if the bearing soils are wetted. The magnitude of movement will depend on the depth and extent of wetting, and depth of moisture sensitive soil below the footing. Precautions should be taken to prevent wetting of the bearing soils. Due to the variability of the subsoils, the bearing conditions should be further evaluated at the time Job No. 108 ISlA -7 - of constmction. After finiher evaluation, a minimum dead load pressure or subexcavation and replacement with compacted granular soils may be recommended to help limit potential differential foundation movement. 2) Footings should have a minimum width of 16 inches for continuous walls and 2 feet for isolated pads. 3) Exterior footings, edges of mats and footings beneath unheated areas should be provided with adequate soil cover above their bearing elevation for frost protection. Placement of foundations at least 36 inches below exterior grade is typically used in this area. 4) Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span local anomalies such as by assuming an unsupported length of at least 14 feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining stmctures should also be designed to resist lateral emih pressures as discussed in the "Foundation and Retaining Walls" section of this report. 5) · Topsoil, debris and any loose or disturbed soils should be removed and the bearing level extended down to undisturbed natural soils. If water seepage is encountered, the bearing areas should be dewatered before concrete placement. 6) A representative of the geotechnical engineer should observe all foundation excavations prior to concrete placement to evaluate bearing conditions. FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS Foundation walls and retaining structures which are laterally supported and can be expected to undergo only a slight amount of deflection should be designed for a lateral ea1ih pressure computed on the basis of an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 55 pcf for backfill consisting of the on-site soils. Cantilevered retaining structures which are separate fi·om the residence and can be expected to deflect sufficiently to mobilize the full active emih pressure condition should be designed for a lateral emih pressure computed Job No. 108 ISlA ~tech -8- on the basis of an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 45 pcf for backfill consisting of the on-site soils. Backfill should not contain topsoil, vegetation or oversized rock. All foundation and retaining structures should be designed for appropriate hydrostatic and surcharge pressures such as adjacent footings, traffic, construction materials and equipment. The pressures recommended above assume drained conditions behind the walls and a horizontal backfilJ surface. The buildup of water behind a wall or an upward sloping backfil1 surface will increase the lateral pressure imposed on a foundation wall or retaining structure. An underdrain should be provided to prevent hydrostatic pressure buildup behind walls. Backfill should be placed in uniform lifts and compacted to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density at near optimum moisture content. Backfill in pavement and walkway areas should be compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density. Care should be taken not to overcompact the backfill or use large equipment near the wall, since this could cause excessive lateral pressure on the wall. Some settlement of deep foundation wall backfill should be expected, even if the material is placed CO!Tectly, and could result in distress to facilities constructed on the backfill. The lateral resistance offoundation or retaining wall footings will be a combination of the sliding resistance of the footing on the foundation materials and passive earth pressure against the side of the footing. Resistance to sliding at the bottoms of the footings can be calculated based on a coefficient of fi'iction of0.35. Passive pressure of compacted backfil1 against the sides of the footings can be calculated using an equivalent fluid unit weight of350 pcf The coefficient of friction and passive pressure values recommended above assume ultimate soil strength. Suitable factors of safety should be included in the design to limit the strain which wil1 occur at the ultimate strength, pm1icularly in the case of passive resistance. Fill placed against the sides of the fuotings to resist lateral loads should be compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density at near optimum moisture content. Job No. 108 ISlA ~tech -9- NON-STRUCTURAL FLOOR SLABS The natural on-site soils, exclusive of topsoil, are suitable to supp01t lightly loaded slab- on-grade construction. The subsoils possess variable settlement/heave potential and there is a risk of slab distress, especially if the subgrade soils are wetted. The settlement/heave potential of the slab subgrade should be further evaluated at the time of construction. To reduce the effects of some differential movement, non-structural floor slabs should be separated from all bearing walls and columns with expansion joints which allow unrestrained vertical movement. Floor slab control joints should be used to reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking. The requirements for joint spacing and slab reinforcement should be established by the designer based on experience and the intended slab use. A minimum 4 inch layer offi·ee-draining gravel should be placed beneath basement level slabs to facilitate drainage. This material should consist of minus 2 inch aggregate with at least 50% retained on the No. 4 sieve and less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve. All fill materials for support of floor slabs should be compacted to at least 95% of maximum standard Proctor density at near optimum moisture content. Required fill can consist of the on-site soils or suitable impmted granular soil (such as road base) devoid of vegetation, topsoil and oversized rock. UNDERDRAlN SYSTEM Although fi·ee water was not encountered during our exploration, it has been our experience in the area that local perched groundwater can develop during times of heavy precipitation or seasonal runoff Frozen ground dw·ing spring runoff can create a perched condition. We recommend below-grade construction, such as retaining walls and basement areas, be protected from wetting and hydrostatic pressure buildup by an underdrain system. Job No. 108 ISlA ~tech - I 0- The drains should consist of drainpipe placed in the bottom of the wall backfill surrounded above the invert level with free-draining granular material. The drain should be placed at each level of excavation and at least I foot below lowest adjacent finish grade and sloped at a minimum I% to a suitable gravity outlet or sump and pump. Free- draining granular material used in the underdrain system should contain less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve, less than 50% passing the No. 4 sieve and have a maximum size of2 inches. The drain gravel backfill should be at least I Y, feet deep. SURFACE DRAINAGE The following drainage precautions should be observed during construction and maintained at all times after the residence has been completed; I) Inundation of the foundation excavations and underslab areas should be avoided during construction. 2) Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density in pavement and slab areas and to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density in landscape areas. 3) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be sloped to drain away fi·om the foundation in all directions. We recommend a minimum slope of 12 inches in the first I 0 feet in unpaved areas and a minimum slope of 3 inches in the first I 0 feet in paved areas. Free-draining wall backfill should be capped with about 2 feet of the on- site soils to reduce surface water infiltration. 4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill. 5) Sprinkler heads and landscaping which requires regular heavy irrigation, such as sod, should be located at least I 0 feet from foundation walls. Consideration should be given to use of xeriscape to reduce the potential for wetting of soils below the building caused by irrigation. Job No. 108 15!A ~tech -II - PERCOLATION TESTING Percolation tests were conducted on April 17, 2008 to obtain soil infiltration rates at the proposed septic disposal area. One profile pit and three shallow test pits were excavated at the locations shown on Figure I. Percolation test holes were hand dug at the bottom of the shallow pits, soaked with water and covered with 2-inch thick rigid foam insulation on April 16, 2008. The soils encountered in the percolation test holes are similar to those encountered in the profile pit shown on Figure 2 and consist of sandy clayey silt. Based on the results of a hydrometer analysis on a small bulk sample obtained fi·om the profile pit, the soils classifY as loam according to the USDA Soil Texturing Chmt. Soil temperatures in the test holes were 44°F and 46°F and the air temperature was 50°F at the time of testing. Based on the subsurface conditions encountered and the percolation test results, the tested area should be suitable for a conventional infiltration septic disposal system. The percolation test results are presented in Table 2. Percolation test results indicate soil infiltration rates between 30 and 60 minutes per inch, with an average of 47 minutes per inch. The maximum loading rate (LT AR) for soils classified as a loam is 0.50 gallons per square foot per day according to information published by the State of Colorado. LIMITATIONS This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted geoteclmical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no watTanty either express or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this repott m·e based upon the data obtained fi·om the exploratory borings drilled and profile pit excavated at the locations indicated on Figure I, the proposed type of construction and our experience in the area. Our services do not include determining the presence, prevention or possibility of mold or other biological contaminants (MOB C) developing in the future. If the client is concerned about MOBC, then a professional in this special field of practice should be consulted. Our findings include interpolation and extrapolation of Job No. 108 ISlA ~tech . 12. the subsurface conditions identified at the exploratory borings and pit and variations in the subsurface conditions may not become evident until excavation is performed. If conditions encountered during construction appear different from those described in this rep01t, we should be notified so that re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes. We are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. As the project evolves, we should provide continued consultation and field services during construction to review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations, and to verity that the recommendations have been appropriately interpreted. Significant design changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommendations presented herein. We recommend on-site observation of excavations and foundation bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a representative of the geotechnical engineer. Respectfully Submitted, HEPWORTH· PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. Trevor L. Knell, P.E. Reviewed by: Daniel E. Hardin, P.E. TLK/vad Job No. 108151A .. 108 151A eBORING2 EXISriNG S/18D • BORING 1 P-1 PROFI LE PIT .6.•.6. 6_ P-3 P-2 I I LOCAT IONS OF EXPLORATORY BOR INGS AND PERGOLA TION TEST \ \ /' FIGURE 1 5665 tu 5660 w Ll. z 0 ~ ~ 5655 w 108 151A BORING 1 ELEV. =5668 .5' 9/12 5/12 WC =16.1 00=1 10 ·200 =75 22/1 2 WC=17.8 00=11 2 50/8 WCa7.2 00=139 60/4 BORING2 ELEV.=5668.5' WC a 12.7 oo ~1 19 ·200 •87 PROFILE PIT ELEV.=5667.0' -. WC •17.3 I ·200 =85 Note: Explanation of sy mbols is shown on Figure 3. LOGS OF EXPLO RATORY BORINGS AND PROFIL E PIT ~tech HEPVIORTH·PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL 5670 5665 5660 tu UJ u. z 0 ~ 5655 ~ w 5650 5645 F IGUR E 2 .~-------===================================================~==------==========·~--- LEGEND : I ~ TOPSOIL; clayey sand silt, root zone, firm , moist, brown . SILT (ML); sandy, slightly clayey to clayey, medium st iff to stiff, moist. brown . CLAY (CL); sandy, stiff to very st iff, slig htly moist to moist, light brown to brown, trace calca reou s. ~ D [d CLAYSTONE/SILTSTONE; weathered to hard, slightly moi st. mixed brown/tan/purple. Wasatch Formation. p Relatively undisturbed drive sample; 2-inch I. D. California lin er sample. 9/12 Drive samp le blow count; indicates that 9 blows of 140 pound hammer falling 30 inch es were required to drive the California samp ler 12 inches . NOTES: 1. Exploratory borings were drilled on April16, 2008 with 4-inch diameter con tinuous flight power auger . Th e profile pit was excavated on the same day with a Kobelco ED150 Bladerunner excavator. 2. Lo ca tions of exploratory borings and profile pit were measured approximately by pacing from features shown on the site plan provided . The proposed building footprint and septic disposal area was provided in the field by Rico Zamora. 3. Elevations of exploratory borings were obtained by interpolation between contours shown on the site plan provided. 4. The exploratory boring lo cat ions and elevations should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by th e method used . 5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory boring logs represent the approximate boundaries between material types and tran sition s may be gradual. 6. No free water was encountered in the borings at the time of drilling or when checked 1 day later. Fluctuation in water leve l may occur with time. 7. Labo ratory Testing Result s: WC = Water Content ( % ) DD = Dry Density ( pet ) -200 = Percent passing No . 200 sieve 1oa 1s1A ~tech H£PWORTH·PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL LEGEND AND NOTES F IGUR E 3 ! • n ~· I lr--,,-~'--r· Moisture Content = 16.1 I i Dry Density == 110 percent pcf 0 1 1 1 lli ~l~·~--:--1 Sample of: Sa nd y Clayey Silt II From: Boring 1 at 4 Feet ;; 0 o 1 1=:::::::=], i I ~till I ~ L I !I 0 ill i 2 ==-----+---_Lll ~L lcf :--:-:-:-H---:-L:·-=LU_ ~ ~ I "i t:-Ft=ttl· 1 r, 1 t-Co m~~~~s ion L I' j ~ 3 I I I I """, I wetting 1 II s 1--!--n L ,~1 : I --r 4 i ll-14 H---:--1;·--:-LJJ I ._______._,___,_L !11 ~ I 0.1 1.0 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE ( ksf) Moisture Content = 17.8 percent 1----+--+--+--f-+-++-H-------1'----l Dry Den sity = 11 2 pcf Sample of: Sa ndy Silty Clay From: Borin g 1 at 9 Feet -1 ~ ~ I l ~ I ~ 0 ~==T-~~~Tnr---ri~,~~~'TH----r-T1-r~~ § 1 ~~"~ ~ 1{ j ~ I I _) I 1\ I' ~ 2 ~-~-~~~~~~~~~· ~~~~~~~~~H0H·~--4-+'-4~~~ ~ I'-Expansion P I ~ upon ~ 3 l----+--+--+--f-+-+-+-H-___:.:.w.:..:.et.:.:;tin~g----1----1:--+~i-H-t----+--+--+-+-+-+-+-H o I 0.1 ~tech HEPWORT H·PAWLAK GEOTECHNIC AL I 1.0 10 APPLIED PRESSURE ( ksf) I II' I I II 100 SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS FIGU RE 4 ·---- Mo istu re Content = 7.2 perc ent Dry Density = 139 pc f ~ I I I I Sam pl e of : Weathered Clays tone/Siltstone * From: Bo ring 1 at 14 Feet ~ 1 I I z I I I I I I I ! 0 I (i5 I z I I I I <( 0 0... ---~ -1 rJ I 1 T I II ~ t--i-I I I I -r-! I z I 0 1 I I U5 I ") ~I) l (/) w I a: 2 i' 0... r r---Expans ion ' I ::2 0 : I () upo n I we ttin g I I I I II I I II I 1 0.1 1.0 10 100 APPLI ED PRESSURE ( ksf ) Mo is ture Content :;:; 12.7 percent Dry Density = 11 9 pcf Sampl e of : Sandy Clayey Si lt From: Bor in g 2 at 2 1/2 Fee t I 1 ~ I * 0 ~ I--1---([ z 1-~ 0 r--rr---~ U5 1 (/) I ~~~-r---+-t-1 I I w r-No movement a: 1) 11 I 0... I'. upon we tti ng ::2 2 0 I l I I () I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0.1 1.0 10 100 APP LI ED PRESSU RE ( ksf ) I 108 151 A ~tech SWELL-CONSOLIDAT ION TEST RES ULTS F IGURE 5 I HEPWORTH·?AWLAK GEOTECHNICAL ' c-:· -..; ---......... ~----~ I I 0 w z ~ a: 1-z ~ a: w !l. HYDROMETER ANPJ.. YSIS CLAY I SILT Grave l 0 % Liquid Limit % USDA Soi l Type: Loam SIEVE ANALYSIS DIAMETER OF PARTICLES IN MILLI METERS I ~ I -I r----.---.-----r----~--+-----.-------~------~ ~~ I • • .,. I ..,. I """"" I COAASe I•.,.... I ""''' LAAGE Sa nd 40 % Sil t 48 % Clay 12 % Plasticity Index % From : Prof ile Pit at 3 to 4 Fe et (!) z Ci5 ~ !z w (.) a: w !l. 108 151A ~tech HYDROMET ER ANALYSIS RES ULTS FIGURE 6 HEPWO RTH-PAWLAK GE OTECHN ICAL HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. TABLE 1 Job No. 108151A SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS SAMPLE LOCATION NATURAL NATURAL GRADATION PERCENT ATTERBERG LIMITS UNCONFINED MOISTURE DRY GRAVEL SAND PASSING LIQUID PLASTIC COMPRESSIVE SOIL OR LOCATION DEPTH CONTENT DENSITY NO. 200 LIMIT INDEX STRENGTH BEDROCK TYPE (%) (%) SIEVE (It) (%) (pel) ~ .. ('Y•) (PSF) Boring 1 4 16.1 110 75 Sandy clayey silt 9 17.8 112 Sandy silty clay 14 7.2 139 Weathered claystone/ siltstone Boring 2 21fz 12.7 119 87 Sandy clayey silt 9 13.4 109 80 Sandy clayey silt Profile Pit 3 to 4 17.3 85 Sandy clayey silt SAMPLE LOCATION NATURAL USDA GRADATION MOISTURE GRAVEL SAND SILT CLAY LOCATION DEPTH CONTENT USDA SOIL TYPE (%) (%) (%) (%) (It) (%) I Profile Pit I 3 to 4 I 17.3 I 0 I 40 I 48 I 12 I I Loam I HOLE NO./ SOIL TEMPERATURE P-1 46°F P-2 44•F P-3 46°F HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. HOLE DEPTH (INCHES) 38 33 31 TABLE 2 PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS LENGTH WATER WATER OF DEPTH AT DEPTH AT INTERVAL START OF END OF (MIN) INTERVAL INTERVAL (INCHES) (INCHES) 15 81/2 8 8 71/2 71/2 7 7 6 1/2 61/2 6 15 6 3/4 61/4 61/4 5 7/8 5 7/8 51/2 51/2 51/4 51/4 5 15 7 3/4 7 112 71/2 7114 7114 7 7 6314 6 314 61/2 DROP IN WATER LEVEL (INCHES) 1/2 1/2 1/2 1/2 1/2 1/2 3/8 3/8 1/4 1/4 114 1/4 114 114 114 JOB NO. 108151A AVERAGE PERCOLATION RATE (MIN./INCH) 30 51 60 Note: Percolation test holes were hand dug in the bottom of shallow test pits and soaked with water on April16, 2008. Percolation tests were conducted on April 17, 2008. The average percolation rates were based on the last three readings of each test. Test holes were covered overnight with 2-inch thick rigid foam insulation. JUL-24-2008 10:03 From:HP-GEDTECH 9709458454 ~tech HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL July 22, 2008 Ryan McKinzie c/o RAZ Construction Attn: Rico Zamora P.O. Box695 Gypsum, Colorado 81637 To:3843470 llq \1 I ttl! I' 1<\ I ~~ l ,, I •fl ', lttlll d It" ~~-.,! ·; l l ·Ill I I l j{ .. 1-.1 I ~, I r dt rr•\. ,, ,_j "I ·r rn~:· t , -1-1 r-.1·, '• It •\ ·I l'lll•l"lt ,_,;· .. :· •q; 7'~\'- 1 1\ ·-l~t.'> 'i4"' '-,-~~1 1 I Ill~~ hj•!.'t• o•ll lq'l!l' •II I Jr l • 0111 Job No. 108 !51 A Subject: Summary of Drilled Pier Observations, Proposed McKinzie Residence, 1404 West 2"d Street, Rifle, Colorado Dear Mr. McKinzie: As requested, a representative of Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. observed drilled pier operations for the residence and garage at the subject site on July 10 and 11, 2008. Our services were performed as a supplement to our proposal for geotechnical engineering services to you c/o RAZ Construction dated April 9, 2008. We previously provided recommendations for drilled pier foundations in our geotechnical study report for the project (Hepwmih-Pawlak Geotechnical, 2008). The proposed residence and garage was designed to be supported by 30 straight-shaft, drilled piers as recommended in our previous report (Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, 2008). The foundation footprints and the pier locations are shown on Figure 2. Pier Nos. I through 18, and 29 and 30 were drilled for the residence and Pier Nos. 19 through 28 were drilled for the garage. Pier Nos. 29 and 30 were added to the design pier schedule and field located on the first day of drilling. The pier holes were 12 and 16 inches in diameter and drilled by Westem Piling with a truck mounted drill rig. The piers were reinforced with full length steel cages consisting of four, No.5 rebar (verticals) with No. 3 rings (12 inch diameter piers) and five, No. 5 rebar (verticals) with No. 3 rings (16 inch diameter piers). Concrete was placed in the pier holes following drilling and concrete test results are provided under separate cover. Groundwater was removed fi·om some of the piers with a submersible pump and 3 inches, or less, of water remained just prior to concrete placement. Short lengths of"Sonotube" were placed at the tops of the pier holes at the time of concrete placement to maintain a uniform pier diameter. JUL-24-2008 10:03 From:HP-GEOTECH 9709458454 To:3843470 P.Y7 A summary of our observations including total pier lengths is provided in Table I, and daily construction activities reports are attached. In general, the pier holes were drilled to depths between 19.9 to 20.6 feet below the excavation grade. The typical penetration in bedrock ranged between about 5 and 9 feet. Based on our observations, the piers should perfonn within the design parameters presented in our previous report. If you have any questions, or need further assistance, please call our office. Sincerely, HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. Trevor L. Knell, P .E. Reviewed by: Steven L. Pawlak, P. E. TLK/vam attachments Figure I -Drilled Pier Layout Table 1-Summary of Drilled Pier Observations Report of Construction Activity, 7/10/08 and 7/11/08 REFERENCE Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, 2008. Subsoil Study and Percolation Tests, Proposed McKinzie Residence, 35 Acre Parcel, Clough Property, Prefontaine Mesa, West of Rifle, 1404 West 2"d Street, Gaifreld County. Colorado. Dated April30, 2008, Job No. 108 l51A. Job No. 108 151A JUL-24-2008 10:03 From:HP-GEOTECH . 9709458454 To :3843470 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 0 GARAGE 0 RESIDENCE 0 ® @ @ 0 0 0 @ 0:f 0 @ @ 0 @ 0 @ ® ® DECK @ LEGEND: 0 DRILLED PIER 108151A ~tech DRILLED PIER LAYOUT FIGURE 1 HEPWORTH·PAWlAK GEOTECHNICAL PIER NO. I 4 _5 6 7 8 9 10 II PIER SURVEY DATE STAKE DRILLED NO. HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. PIER DIA. (in) TABLE 1 SUMMARY OF DRILLED PIER OBSERVATIONS I (ft) OVERBURDEN BEDROCK TOTAL GROUND TOP OF PIER ELEVATION ELEVATION WATER DEPffi@ CONCRETE PLA~~NT Job No. 108 ISlA PLUMBNESS ('/.)/ DIRECTION CONCRETE PLACEMENT ORDER 5 178 7/10/08 16 12.0 8.3 ~0.3 89'-{;" 89'~" dry l" truck 5 179 7/10/08 16 13.0 7.3 20.3 89'-{;" 89'-{;" drj' 5 167 7/10/08 12 14.0 6.2 20.2 89'-{;" 89'-{;" dry 0 truck 5077 7110108 12 12.0 8.0 20.0 89'-{;" 89'-{;" dry 0.4/east truck 5076 7110/08 16 11.0 9.4 20.4 89'-{;" 89'-{;" 3 truck 5080 7/11/08 16 12.0 8.1 20.1 89'-{;" 89'-{;" dry 0.4/east • truck 5068 7/11108 16 13.0 7.1 20.1 89'-6" 89'-{;" dry I" r truck 5075 7/11108 12 13.0 7.4 20.4 89'-6" 89'-{;" dry 0 truck 5081 7111/08 12 12.0 8.2 20.2 89'-6" 89'-{;" dry 1.2/east truck 5082 111108 12 8.1 20.1 89'-{;" 1'-{;" drv 0.4/east ~k 5083 111/08 12 8.3 20.3 89'-<>" I'• drv 0 1" truck 5069 Ill 18 12 8.4 20.4 89'-{;" I'• ~ I!! Ill 12 I 8.2 20.2 89'-{;" I'• dry 0 · I" truck 5074 7/ 18 16 12.0 8.3 20.3 89'-{;" 89'-' moist I" truck 5 5070 7/ 1: 12.0 20.3 89'-{;" 89'• mmst 16_ 5073 7/ 18 16 11.0 _2_().4_ 89'~ 89'-moist 1" truck 17 5072 7/ 18 16 11.0 20.3 89'-6" 89'-3 0.8/east I" truck 18 5071 7/11/08 12 12.0 8.1 20.1 89'-6" 89'-{;" moist 0.8/east 'truck 19 17 7/10/08 12 15.0 5.0 20.0 90'· 90'-3 0 2~ truck 20 58 7/10/08 12 15.0 5.4 20.4 90'• 90'-3_ 0.4/_...,t I" truck Zl 59 7110/08 12 15.0 5.6 21 90'• 90'-3_ 1" truck 22 66 7110/08 12 14.0 6.0 21 90'-90'-dry_ I" truck 23 62 7/10/08 12 14.5 6.0 11 90'-90'-3 2" truck 24 060 7/10/08 12 14.5 5.4 I! 90'-90'-l 3 0.8/east :~truck 25 5061 7110/08 12 14.0 6.0 20.0 90'-{;" 90'-2" 2 0 ,., trucl 26 5065 10/08 13.0 7.0 20.0 90'-{;" 90'-2" dry I" true 27 5064 10/08 l 7.0 20.0 90'-6" 90'-2" 3 0.8/east I" true 28 5063 I0/08 5.5 20.0 90'-6' 90'-2" 3 0 3' true *= !Pier '-< c ' ' 'R ' ru IS) :;g ~ IS) IS) w " , 0 3 I " ' "' gJ § _, 0 " Ul ' --J JUL-24-2008 10:04 From:HP-GEDTECH 9709458454 c:~c!>tech HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL To:3843470 5020 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: 970-945-7988 Fax: 970-945-8454 hpgeo@hpgeotech.com CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY REPORT Client: Ryan McKinzie Job No.: 108 161A Day: Thursday 7/10/08 c/o RAZ Construction Attn: Rico Zamora P.O. Box 696 Gypsum, Colorado 81637 Project: McKinzie Residence, 1404 West 2"d Street, Rifle, Colorado Weather: Clear, calm, dry Temperature: 90°F Date: Page: 1 of 1 Contractor's Construction Activities: Western Piling drilled pier hole Nos. 1·5 and 19·30. RAZ Construction placed concrete (supplied by Casey Concrete) In same pier holes following drilling. Equipment In Use: Truck mounted pier drilling rig, excavator, loader HP Geotech's Site Activities: We observed the pier hole drilling operations and concrete placement at the site. A summary of the pier construction and our observations will be presented as part of our summary report. The contractor used a suction pump with submersible hose to remove water In excess of 3 inches deep in pier holes when needed prior to concrete placement. A short length of "Sonotube" was placed at the top of the pier holes to maintain a uniform pier diameter. Concrete test results are presented under separate cover. Verbal Communication: Rico Zamora with RAZ Construction was informed of our observations. Tim Barrett Trevor L. Knell, P.E. Field Technician Reviewed By JUL-24-2008 10:04 From:HP-GEOTECH 9709458454 ~ech HEPWORTH· PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL To:3843470 5020 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: 970·945-7988 Fax: 970-945-8454 hpgeo@hpgeotech.com CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY REPORT Client: Ryan McKinzie c/o RAZ Construction Attn: Rico Zamora P.O. Box 696 Job No.: 108151A Day: Date: Page: Friday 7/11/08 1 of 1 Gypsum, Colorado 81637 Project: McKinzie Residence, 1404 West 2"d Street, Rifle, Colorado Weather: Partly cloudy, calm, dry Contractor's Construction Activities: Equipment In Use: HP Geotech's Site Activities: Verbal Communication: Temperature: 80 to 90°F Western Piling drilled pier hole Nos. 6-18. RAZ Construction placed concrete (supplied by Casey Concrete) In same pier holes following drilling. Truck mounted pier drilling rig, excavator, loader We observed the pier hole drilling operations and concrete placement at the site. A summary of the pier construction and our observations will be presented as part of our summary report. A short length of "Sonotube" was placed at the top of the pier holes to maintain a uniform pier diameter. Concrete test results are presented under separate cover. Rico Zamora with RAZ Construction was informed of our observations. Tim Barrett Trevor L. Knell, P.E. Field Technician Reviewed By