Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication - PermitI Garfield County Building & Planning Department 108 8th Stree~ Suite #401 Glenwood Springs, Co. 81601 Offlce :970-945-B212 Fax: 970-384-3470 Inspection Line: 970.384-5003 Building Permit No. _ll DZlP ___ ~- Parcel No: 2407-202-26-005 Locality: Monument Ridge Subd, Lot 5 Job Address: 0060 CR 303 Parachute Use of Building : ___ ~dwelling o!!Wnished basement with covered deck Owner: __ Trani, Bri~ Contractor: Owner Fees : Plan Check : $ 1,199.22 Septic: s 73.00 Bldg Permit: $ 1,844 .95 Other Fees: Total Fees: $ 3,117.17 Clerk : ~S(Xl Date: 7_)_21/CB I 2 3 4 5 () I.J /tJ G'/( 6 Architect I Engineer: OWAI[i. 7 Sq. Ft. of Building: 8 Use of Building: 9 Describe Work: 10 Closs of Work: II Gorage: N{A 12 Driveway Pennil. GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION 108 glh Stn:et. Suite 401, Glenwood Springs, Co 81601 Phone: 970-945-8212/ Fox: 970-384-3470 /Inspection Line: 970-384-5003 www. sarfic ld -count , .com o Alteration o Addition Septic: 0 J)elached SDS D Communi! r -0-~5 Owners valuation of Work: S NOTICE Al!.l!!2dlx· This application for a Building Penni! must be signed by lhc Owner oflhe property, described above, or en euthorizcd agent If !he slgnarure below is not tb111 oftbe Owner. a scparale lcner ofaulhorily, signed by the Owner, must be provided witb Ibis Application. L!p! Aeceu. A Building Pamil c:annot be issued wilbout proof oflcplend adeqllalc aea:sslo !he property for puiJlOSCS ofinspcclions by lhc Building Dcpanmcnt ()doer Penaln. Multiple 1CJN1r81e p!ltltiu may be h!Ciuitod: (I) Swc Elccuical Pc:rmit, (2) Cc!Lmly ISDS Ponnil, (3) anolhcr pcnnilh!Ciuitod for usc on lhe propcny idcnlilicd above, c..g. Stale or Cc!WIIy Highway/ Road Access or a Swe Waslcwala Disdwge Pc:rmit Void Pennlt, A Building Permil becomes null and void if !he work auduxilcd is n01 commonecd wilbin 180 days of !be dille oriuuenc;e end ifworit is suspended or abandoned for a period of 180 days after CDttUliCIICCIJIL C£RTIFICA110N I hereby certifY !hall have mod Ibis Appliadion and lhu !he information eonlained llbove is true and c:oiRCI. I undenland llulllhe Buildtng Depaltmomt IIIXI!piS lhe Appliea~ion.lllong wilh lhe plans and specifications and olher data submitted by r11e ..-on my behalf(oubmillllls), based upoa my cmitk.lioo as lo IIQ:UI'lll;)'. Assuming complelelless oflbe submit1als and approvlll oflhia Application, a Building Penni! will be iiSIIod snmring penniasion lome, as Owner, to COitSIIUCt lhc llttUI:Iue{s) and fadliriC$ detailed on !be submillals rnicwed by 1hc Building Dcpanmcnt In consideration of !be issuance oflhe Building Penni!, l epee !hall and my ascnu will comply wilh proviaions of any fodcral, slalc or local law rqularing tbe work and lhc Cl!lrfield Cocmty Building Code, ISDS regularions and applicable llllld usc mgulalions (C011111y Rq;ullllion(a)). I acknowledge lhallhe Buildins Pc:rmil may be suspended or revoked, Upclll notice liom lhe Counly. if !he location, conslnlclion or usc oflhc stl'UCI1m{s) and lilcility(ics), described above, -oat in complimcc wilh Counly Rcgulalion(s) or any olhcr applicable law. I bercby grant permission to die Building~~ to cnh!rtbe property, dcscribed llbovc, lo inspa:~lhc wmk. I furth.,. acknowledge lhallbe issuance of !he Buildins Penni! doC$ oat prncnllhe Building Ollicialliom: (I) h!Ciuiringlhc c:orrection of errors in lhc submillals, if any, disc:overcd after ismanc:c; or (2) atopping c:onstruc:tion or usc oftbc 11ructutc(s) or lilcility(ics) if such is in viollllion ofCounly Regulation(s) or any Olbcr applicable law. Review of Ibis Application, including subminals, and inspections of !he work by lhc Building Department do nol c:onstitulc an aa:cpeanc;e ofrcspoasihili!y or liability by !be CoWity of crron, omissions or discrcp:lncics. As !he Owner, I aclmowlcdse !hal responsibility for complianc:e wilb fodcral, -c and locallawsmd Cowdy Regulations rest wilh me 1111d my autborilcd qenl.s, including wilhout limilation my ardlilcc:t designer, cnpcer and/ or builder I HEREBY ACKNOWLElXiE TIIAT READ AND UNDERSf AND TilE NOTICE&: CERTIFICATION ABOVE: VA~I/01-N/ DATE STAFF USE ONLY Special Condilions: Adjusted Valuation: Plan Check Fee: Permit Fee: Manu home Fee: Mise: Fees: Z.SI I 69 h . [ll2 I ICJ1. ~2 1,844·~ ...___ ISDS Fee: Total Fees: Fees Paid: Balanc:e Due: BP Ne & Issue Date: ISDS No & Issued Date: '7 3,0f) 3/1?.17 I I CJ9, ;;. ';l lt:t 1(. 't s I J D2l/17fv l/'-175 7f~tfe " Setbacks: OCCGroup: Consl Type: Zoning: BLDG DEPT: PLNGDEPT: 4~J~ ~~~ ~~ ~~rr APPROVAL DATE APPROVAL DATE The following items are required by Garfield County for a final Inspection: 1) A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector. 2) Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department and posted at the structure and where readily visible from access road. · 3) A finished roof; a lockable building; completed exterior siding; exterior doors and windows installed; a complete kitchen with cabinets, sink with hot & cold running water, non-absorbent kitchen floor covering, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove and refrigerator; all necessary plumbing. 4) All bathrooms must be complete, with washbowl, tub or shower, toilet, hot and cold running water, non-absorbent floors, walls finished, and privacy door. 5) Steps over three (3) risers, outside or inside must be must have handrails. Balconies and decks over 30" high must be constructed to all IBC and IRC requirements including guardrails. 6) Outside grading completed so that water slopes away from the building; 7) Exceptions to the outside steps, decks, grading may be made upon the demonstration of extenuating circumstances., i.e. weather. Under such circumstances A Certificate of Occupancy may be issued conditionally. 8) A final inspection sign off by the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department for driveway installation, where applicable; as well as any final sign offby the Fire District, and/or State Agencies where applicable. A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (C.O.) WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTll.. ALL THE ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. A C.O. MAY TAKE UP TO S BUSINESS DAYS TO BE PROCESSED AND ISSUED. OWNER CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A C.O. IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ll..LEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATING PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET. I understand and agree to abide by the above conditions for occupancy, use and the issuance of a C.O. for the building identified in the Building Permit. OWNERS SIGNATURE Bopplicationdccernber2007 DATE 7 / VALUATION FEE DETERMINATION Applicant -":B"='"ri"'::an~Tran~i __________ Subdivision Monument Ridge ,S.,hd • Address 0 o 60 CR-303 Lot/Block Lot 5 Date 7/18/2008 Contractor -=o~wn=-=-er----------- Finished (Livable Area): Main Upper Lower Other Total Basement: Unfinished Square Feet Valuation Conversion of Unfinished to Finished Total Valuation Garage: Valuation Crawl Space Valuation Decks/ Patios Valuation Covered Open Type of Construction: Occupancy: Valuation Total Valuation 1200 sf 800 sf 1200 sf sf X $74.68 3200 sf sf X $41.00 sf X $33.68 sf X $18.00 sf X $9.00 530 sf X $24.00 sf X $12.00 Commercial sf X sf X sf X sf X sf X sf X 238,976.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12,720.00 0.00 251,696.00 GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING 970-945-8212 MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS For SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING CONSTRUCTION Including NEW CONSTRUCTION ADDITIONS ALTERATIONS And MOVED BUILDINGS In order to understand the scope of the work intended under a permit application and expedite the issuance of a permit it is important that complete information be provided. When reviewing a plan and it's discovered that required information has not been provided by the applicant, this will result in the delay of the permit issuance and in proceeding with building construction. The owner or contractor shall be required to provide this information before the plan review can proceed. Other plans that are in line for review may be given attention before the new information may be reviewed after it has been provided to the Building Department. TWO (2) SETS OF CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS & TWO (2) SITE PLANS MUST BE SUBMITIEDFOR ALL APPLICATIONS. Please review this document to determine if you have enough information to design your project and provide adequate information to facilitate a plan review. Also, please consider using a design professional for assistance in your design and a construction professional for construction of your project. Any project with more than ten (10) occupants requires the plans to be sealed by a Colorado Registered Design Professional. To provide for a more understandable plan in order to determine compliance with the building, plumbing and mechanical codes, applicants are requested to review the following checklist prior to and during design. Applicants are required to indicate appropriately and to submit the completed checklist at time of application for a permit. Plans to be included for a Building Permit, must be on drafting paper at least 18"x24" and drawn to scale. J Plans must include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations all sides with decks, balcony, steps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the finish grade line and original grade. A section showing in detail, from the bottom of the footing to the top of the roof, including re-bar, anchor bolts, pressure treated plates, floor joists, wall studs and spacing, insulation, sheeting, house-rap, (which is required), siding or any approved building material. Engineered foundations may be required. A window schedule. A door schedule. A floor framing plan, a roof framing plan, roof must be designed to withstand a 40 pound per square foot up to 7,000 feet in elevation, a 90 M.P.H. wind speed, wind exposure B or C, and a 36 inch frost depth. All sheets to be identified by number and indexed. All of the above requirements must be met or your plans will be returned . All plans submitted must be incompliance with the 2003 IRC. 1. Is a site plan included that identifies the location of the proposed structure or addition and distances to the property lines from each corner of the proposed structure(s) prepared by a licensed surveyor and has the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing? Properties with slopes of 30% or greater must be shown on the site plan. (NOTE Section: 106.2) Any site plan for the placement of any portion of a structure within 50 ft. of a property line and not within a previously surveyed building envelope on a subdivision final plat shall be prepared by a licensed surveyor and have the surveyor's signature and professional stamp on the drawing. Any structure to be built within a building envelope of a lot shown on a recorded subdivision plat shall include a copy of the building envelope as it is shown on the final plat with the proposed structure located within the envelope. Yes>( 2. Does the site plan also include any other buildings on the property, setback easements and utility easements? Please refer to Section 5.05 .03 in the Garfield County Zoning Resolution if the property you are applying for a building permit on is located on a comer lot . Special setbacks do apply. J Yes_~K.....~-- 3. Does the site plan include when applicable the location of the I.S.D.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System) and the distances to the property lines, wells (on subject property and adjacent properties), streams or water courses? Yes X 4. Does the site plan indicate the location and direction of the County or private road accessing the propertyv Yes 6 --.·"--~< -- 2 5. Are you aware that prior to submittal of a building permit application you are required to show proof of a legal and adequate access to the site? This may include (but is not limited to) proof of your right to use a private easement/right of way; A County Road and Bridge permit; a Colorado Dept. of Highway Permit, including a Notice to Proceed; a permit from the federal government or any combination. You can contact the Road & Bridge Department at 625-860 1. See phone book for other agencies ';) _ /' 77 i? /'\B _ D _ 6 r _ Yes ~ /E!ZMI/ c_rt~.ou -> 6. Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all reinforcing steel in accordance with the IRC or per stamped engineered design? Yes X.. 7. Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl spaces and the clearance~quired between wood and earth? Yes ,6 No ____ _ 8. Do the plans indicate the size and location of ventilation openings for the attic, roof joist spaces and soffits? Yes X No. ____ _ 9. Do the plans include design loads as required by Garfield County for roof snow loads, (a minimum of 40 pounds per square foot up to & including 7,000 feet above sea level), floor loads and wind loads? Yes X.. 10. Does the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor, and roof construction? Yes X 11. Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists, wall studs, ceiling joists, roof raft~9r joists or trusses? Yes._~A~-.::oc:::::---- 12. Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method of positive connection of all columns and beams? Yes X:: 13. Does the elevation plan indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the undisturbed grade to the midpoint between the ridge and eave of a gable or shed roof or the top of a flat roof? (Building height measurement usually not to exceed 25 feet) Yes X ~ 14. Does the plan include any stove or zero clearance fireplace planned for installation including make and model and Colorado Phase I certifications or phase ll EPA certification? Yes No __ ~~~--- 3 15. Does the plan include a masonry fireplace including a fireplace section indicating design to comply with the IRC? Yes ____ No_~~~i;.__l:t'--- 16. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that egress/rescue windows from sleeping rooms and/or basements comply with the requirements of the IRC? Yes )<( 17. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that windows provide natural light and ventilation for all habitable rooms? Yes X.. 18. Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass doors, glazing immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as a walking surface; sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub enclosures and specifY safety glazing for these areas? Yes C>( No ______ _ 19. Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces, boilers and water heaters indicated on the pla~'l /' Yes A _....._....._ __ _ 20. Do you understand that ifyou are building on a parcel of land created by the exemption process or the subdivision process, are building plans in compliance with all plat notes and/or covenants? Yes X: 21. Do you understand that ifyou belong to a Homeowners Association (HOA), it is your responsibility to obtain written permission from the association, if required by that association, prior to submitting an application for a building permit? The building permit application will be accepted without it, but you run the risk of the HOA bringing action to enforce the covenants, which can result in revocation of permit issued. Additionally, your Plan Review fee is not refundable if the plans have been reviewed by the Building Department prior to any action by the HOA that requires either revocation or s stantial modification of the plans. Yes. __ ~~H-- 22. Will this be the only residential structure on the parcel? Yes )< No lfno-Explain: _____ _ 23. Have two (2) complete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the application? Yes ~ ~< 24. Do you understand that the minimum dimension a home can be on a lot is 20ft.wide and 20ft. long? Yes ~ 4 25. Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other construction code requirements? Yes .)( 26. Do your plans comply with all zoning rules and regulations in the County related to your properties zone dis~·ctt]? Yes J<....... --L--..::...... __ _ 27. Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a final inspection by the G)(1eld County Building Department? Yes _ -,-r~--- 28. Do you understand that approval for design and/or construction changes are required prior to the application of these changes? Yes )( / 29. Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a "Plan Review" fee from you at the time of application submittal and that you will be required to pay the "Permit Fee" as well as any "Road)Zlm act" or "Septic System" fees required, at the time you pick up your building permit? Yes ----: ......... :::----- 30. Are you aware that you must call in for an inspection by 3:30 the business day before the requested inspection in order to receive it the following business day? Inspections will be made from 7:30a.m. to 3:30p.m. Monday through Friday. Inspections are to be called in to 384-)(50 3. Yes No ------ 31. Are you aware that requesting inspections on work that is not ready or not accessible will result in a $50.00 re-inspection fee? Yes X< 32. Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the IRC including approval on a final inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy and occupancy of the building(. / Yes_~)<....____:::::..._ __ 33. Are you aware that the Permit Application must be signed by the Owner or a written authority being given for an Agent and that the party responsible for the project must comply with the IRC? Yes X, 5 34. Do you understand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed Electrician and Plumber to perform installations and hookups, unless you as the homeowner are performing the work? The license number of the person performing the work will be required at time of applicable inspection. Yes X 35. Are you aware, that on the front of the Building Permit Application you will need to fill in the Parcel/Schedule Number for the lot you are applying for this permit on prior to submittal of a building permit application? Your attention in this is appreciated. Yes )( / 36. Do you know that the local fire district may require you to submit plans for their review of fire safety . ? ISSUeS. V Yes ___..6.~----(please check with the building department about this requirement) 37. Do you understand that if you are planning on doing any excavating or grading to the property prior to issuance of a building permit that you will be required to obtain a grading permit? Yes 'X < 38. Are you aware that if you will be connecting to a public water and/or sewer system, that the tap fees have to be paid and the connections inspected by the service provider prior to the issuance of a Certific~ccupancy? Yes ~ I hereby acknowledge that I have read, understand and answered these questions to the best of my ability. Signature of Owner ; Phone: 970 -9~6 -6.38'7 (days); Project Name: f}c oPo.t t:o ~,vI Project Address: 6 Date 97o-7~fl-6X8z (evenings) ksJ/)b~c£ Applicant llKl1 i PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST Date -;)ejr;a Building /Engineered Foundation vi Driveway Permit ~ Surveyed Site Plan ~Septic Permit and Setbacks / Grade/Topography 30% ~ Attach Residential Plan Review List ----'Minimum Application Questionnaire / Subdivision Plat Notes fV(t9 Fire Department Review / Valuation Determination/Fees ~ Red Line Plans/Stamps/Sticker / Attach Conditions -- / Application Signed IJ Plan Reviewer To Sign Application J ParceVSchedule No. Jf(A 40# Snowload Letter-Manf. Hms . ./ Soils Report GENERAL NOTES: ; Planning/Zoning J Property Line Setbacks IJf 30ft Stream Setbacks / Flood Plain ~ Building Height _LZoning Sign-off N,/A Road Impact Fees tJjA HOA!DRC Approval ./ Gradeffopography 40% ~Planning Issues / Subdivision Plat Notes I \ I -- Garfield County Road and Bridge Department P.O. Box426 Rifle, CO 81650 Phone-(970)625--8601 Fax-(970)6~27 Invoice Driveway Permit Number: GRBOS-D-65 Invoice Date: 6j26fl008 Bill To: Trani, Brian 60CR303 Parachute ,CO 81635 \ $75.00 per Driveway Permit. i veway Permit Fee: $75.00 ---------- Due: $75.00 Thank You! r D D D D D c 0 D D J J .J Geotechnical I ~.Engineering I Group, Inc. RESIDENTIAL SOILS INVESTIGATION Proposed Single-Family Residence 60 Gardner Lane Battlement Mesa, Colorado Prepared For: Brian Trani 47 Bryan Loop Parachute, Colorado 81635 COP/' Job No. 2,935 April 24, 2008 Geotechnical, Environmental and Materials Testing Consultants Grand Junction-Montrose-Moab-Crested Butte (970) 245-4078 • fax (970) 245-7115 • geotechnicalgroup.com 2308 Interstate Avenue, Grand Junction, Colorado 81505 '' D ~ D [ n D 0 D D D I _j TABLE OF CONTENTS SCOPE ............................................................................................................................ 1 SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS .................................................................................... 2 SITE CONDITIONS .................................................••.••................................................... 2 PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ...............................................................................•...••• 3 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS ..........................................................................•.........•••• 4 RESIDENCE FOUNDATIONS .•.......................................................•.•.•••.••••••..•..........••.. 5 SPREAD FOOTING FOUNDATIONS ...•••.....•...•.........••...•...•......•••.••••...•••.......••.....•....•••••••...• 6 FLOOR SYSTEMS -SPREAD FOOTING FOUNDATIONS .......................................... 7 BELOW-GRADE CONSTRUCTION ....••.••.....•....••.••.•••......••........................................... 9 CONCRETE .................................................................................................................. 11 SURFACE DRAINAGE ................................................................................................. 11 ] CONSTRUCTION MONITORING ................................................................................. 13 ...J J ..... J l l J J J LIMITATIONS ............................................................................................................... 13 FIG. 1 -VICINITY MAP FIG. 2 -LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY TEST BORINGS FIG. 3-KEY TO SYMBOLS FIGS. 4 THROUGH 7-LOGS OF EXPLORATORY TEST BORINGS FIGS. 8 THROUGH 10 -SWELL I CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS FIG. 11 -DIRECT SHEAR TEST RESULTS FIGS. 12 AND 13 -FOUNDATION WALL DRAIN CONCEPTS TABLE I -SUMMARY OF LAB ORA TORY TEST RESULTS J J J ,...., ...., I ' ..J D ....I I .J ..., J ...., I l • .J J l J SCOPE This report presents the results of a residential soils investigation for the proposed single-family residence to be located at 60 Gardner Lane in Battlement Mesa, Colorado. Our investigation was conducted to explore subsurface conditions and provide foundation recommendations for the proposed residential structure. The report includes descriptions of subsoil and groundwater conditions found in four exploratory test borings, recommended foundation systems, allowable design soil pressures, and design and construction criteria for details influenced by the subsurface conditions. This investigation was performed in general conformance with our Proposal No. 08-032 dated March 17, 2008. The report was prepared from data developed during our field exploration, laboratory testing, engineering analysis and experience with similar conditions. A brief summary of our conclusions and recommendations follows. Detailed criteria are presented within the report . 60 Gardner Lane Battlement Mesa, Colorado GEG Job No. 2,935 1 D • 0 D n J D 0 -, .J J J J l J l SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS 1. 2. 3. 4. Subsoils found in the exploratory test borings consisted of silty, sandy clay underlain by sandy silty clay with cobbles to the maximum depths explored of 16 to 17 feet below the ground surface. Groundwater was not encountered to the maximum depth explored at the time of drilling. We believe a shallow type foundation can be constructed to perform satisfactorily for the proposed residence. A discussion, including detailed design and construction criteria are included in the text of the report. We believe slab-on-grade construction supported by the soils encountered may have potential for movement. We recommend structurally supported floors in all finished areas. Additional discussion, including design and construction criteria, is included in the text of the report . Surface drainage should be designed for rapid runoff of surface water away from the proposed structure. SITE CONDITIONS The subject site was located at 60 Gardner Lane in Battlement Mesa, Colorado. A vicinity map showing the site location is included as Fig. 1. The subject site was located within the Monument Ridge Subdivision. Scattered rocks and grasses covered the site. An existing excavation for the proposed residence was excavated about two to three feet into the ground at the time of our investigation. A major drainage channel was noted bordering the south portion of the lot. The drainage channel was about 10 to 15 feet deep, 60 Gardner Lane Battlement Mesa, Colorado GEG Job No. 2,935 2 0 0 0 0 0 D D 0 D ...., .J ...., ....., I J about 30 to 40 feet wide at the crest and had a channel slope inclination of about 2 horizontal to 1 vertical or steeper down from the site. Gardner lane was north of the site. Vacant land was east, west and south of the site. The subject site sloped to the west- southwest at an inclination of approximately 5 to 1 0 percent. The vicinity sloped down toward the northwest at an inclination of approximately 10 to 15 percent (USGS, Parachute, Colorado topographic quadrangle dated 1962 revised 1973). ~ PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION We understand the proposed construction will consist of a single-story 5 bedroom single family residence. The structure will be approximately 2,000 square feet in plan area and have a basement. We understand that no grading change is being considered . We anticipate foundation loads may range from 1,000 to 2,000 pounds per lineal foot of foundation wall. If proposed construction is different than what is described above, we should be notified so that we can re-evaluate the recommendations given . 60 Gardner Lane B•tllement Mese, Colorado GEG Job No. 2,935 D D D D 0 D D 0 j J J SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Subsurface conditions at the site were investigated by excavating and sampling four exploratory test borings. The locations of the exploratory test borings are shown on Fig. 2. Graphic logs of the soils found in the exploratory borings and field penetration resistance tests are presented on Figs. 3 through 7. Subsoils found in the test borings consisted of sandy, silty clay with clayey sand lenses with cobbles to a maximum depths explored of 16 to 17 feet. The sandy, silty clay with cobbles was stiff to very stiff, slightly moist to moist and brown to red. Virtual drill rig refusal was encountered in all the borings at depths of 16 to 17 feet. Groundwater was not encountered to the maximum depths explored of 16 to 17 feet. One sandy, silty clay sample tested had a moisture content of 13.5 percent a liquid limit of 34, a plasticity index of 11 and had 87 percent passing a No.200 sieve (silt and clay sized particles). One clayey sand sample tested had a moisture content of 7.8 percent a liquid limit of 33, a plasticity index of 15 and had 43 percent passing a No.200 sieve. Three sandy, silty clay samples tested had moisture contents of 11.6 to 13.2 percent, dry densities of 83 to 115 pcf and exhibited 1.7 percent consolidation to 0.9 percent swell with estimated swell pressures of 80 to 670 psf when wetted under confining pressures of 0 to 250 psf. One silty, sandy gravel sample tested exhibited 3.3 percent consolidation when wetted under a confining pressure of 500 psf. One sandy, 60 Ganlner Lana Batllement Mesa, Colorado GEG Job No. 2,935 4 J J ..., J 0 J ...J ...J I ...... J J J l ....J J J .. silty clay sample tested had a moisture content of 9.3 percent, a dry density of 86 pcf, a liquid limit of 33, a plasticity index of 8, had an internal angle of friction of 18 degrees and a cohesion of 200 psf. Results of laboratory testing are shown on Figs. 8 through 11 and summarized on Table I. RESIDENCE FOUNDATIONS This investigation indicates subsurface conditions at foundation levels consist of sandy, silty clay with cobbles with volume change potential indicated in laboratory testing. We understand shallow foundations are desired for the subject site. In our experience, shallow foundations have been used in this area with satisfactory performance in conditions similar to those identified at this site. The resulting subsoils beneath foundations should be scarified , moisture conditioned and recompacted, to help reduce potential soil settlement and provide a more uniform subgrade. These criteria were developed from analysis of field and laboratory data and our experience. The additional requirements (if any) of the structural engineer and structural warrantor should also be considered. Observations of the slope at the north portion of the site indicate potential shallow slope movement. We recommend the structure be liD Gardner Lane Battlement Mesa, Colorado GEG Job No. 2,935 l ..J 0 D l "1 .J ...J ..J J J located on the lot such that no permanent foundations are located within 40 feet of the slope crest. We are available to discuss this with you. Spread Footing Foundations 1. 2. 3. Footing foundations bearing on 2 feet of well compacted structural fill can be designed for maximum soils bearing pressure of 1 ,000 psf. The resulting subgrade in foundation areas should be scarified 10 inches, moisture conditioned and recompacted to 95 percent of standard Proctor (ASTM 0698) to help mitigate potential soil settlement and provide a more uniform subgrade. The compacted subgrade should extend 2 foot beyond each footing, horizontally. Loose soils should be completely removed from foundation bearing areas, prior to placing fill or concrete. If structural fill is used to achieve grade, the structural fill should be a crushed, uniformly graded, granular material with a maximum size of 1.5 inches, maximum of 15 percent passing the No . 200 sieve and maximum liquid limit of 30. A COOT Class 5 or Class 6 type crushed base course could be used to satisfy these criteria and is recommended. The structural fill should be placed in maximum 1 0-inch loose lifts, moisture conditioned to within 2 percent of optimum moisture content and compacted to at least 95 percent maximum standard Proctor dry density (ASTM D 698). We recommend a minimum width of 18 inches for continuous footings. Isolated pads should be at least 30 inches by 30 inches. Foundation walls should be well-reinforced top and bottom. We recommend reinforcement sufficient to span an unsupported distance of at least 12 feet. A qualified structural engineer should design foundation reinforcement. 60 Gardner Lane Battlement Mesa, Colon~do GEG Job No. 2,936 ' D D D 0 0 D D 0 D D 0 D 0 D D 0 J J J 4 . 5. 6. If the footings are designed and constructed as discussed above, we estimate that the post construction total settlement will be about% inch. The estimated settlement is dependent on foundation bearing pressure, soil conditions supporting the footings and footing width. If the foundation bearing pressures, soil conditions or the footing widths are different than discussed above, we should be contacted to provide additional settlement considerations. Exterior walls must be protected from frost action. Refer to the local building code for details. The completed foundation excavation should be observed by our representative, to test subgrade and fill compaction and to verify subsurface conditions are as anticipated. FLOOR SYSTEMS -Spread Footing Foundations We believe the near surface soils which will support slab-on-grade floors exhibited volume change potential. Some movement must be assumed from an increase in moisture by residential development and associated landscaping and irrigation. To our knowledge, the only reliable solution to control floor movement is the construction of a structurally supported floor with at least a 12-inch air space between the floor and subgrade. In our opinion, structural floors should be used in all finished living areas. Structurally supported floors are normally not used in garage areas. A slab-on-grade floor can be used in garages provided the builder and owner are aware of and accept risk of 60 Gardner Line Battlement Mesa, Colorado GEG Job No. 2,936 1 D D D D D D D D 0 0 0 0 0 0 D _j J J • potential movement. Driveways, sidewalks and exterior patio slabs are also constructed as slabs-on-grade. We recommend the following precautions for construction of slabs-on-grade at this site. These precautions will not prevent movement in the event the underlying conditions become wetted; they tend to reduce damage or mask the effects if movement occurs. 1. The subgrade should be scarified 10-inches, moisture conditioned to within 2 percent of optimum moisture content and compacted to at least 95 percent of maximum dry standard Proctor density (ASTM 0698). Structural fill soils (as required to achieve grade) should be placed on well compacted subgrade, moisture conditioned and compacted in maximum 10-inch loose lifts as described above for subgrade preparation and should be tested every 1 foot lift. The existing site soils are not be suitable for reuse. 2. Slabs should be separated from exterior walls and interior bearing members with a slip joint, which allows for free vertical movement of slabs. 3. The use of slab-bearing partitions should be minimized. Where such partitions are necessary, a slip joint allowing at least 2 inches of free vertical slab movement should be used. The owner should be advised of potential movement and re-establish this void if it closes. Doorways and stairwells should also be designed for this movement. Sheetrock should not extend to slab-on-grade floors. 4. Under slab plumbing should be eliminated where feasible. Where such plumbing is unavoidable, it should be thoroughly pressure tested during construction for leaks and should be provided with flexible couplings. Gas and water lines leading to slab-supported appliances should be constructed with flexibility. 5. Plumbing and utilities, which pass through slabs, should be isolated from the slabs. Heating and air conditioning systems supported by the slabs should be provided with flexible connections capable of at least 2 inches of 60 Gardner Lane BaUiement Mesa, Colorado GEG Job No. 2,935 • D J D 0 ....J 0 J J J vertical movement so that slab movement is not transmitted to the ductwork. 6. Frequent control joints should be provided to reduce problems associated with shrinkage and curling. The American Concrete Institute (ACI) and Portland Cement Association (PCA) recommend a maximum panel size of 8 to 15 feet depending upon concrete thickness and slump, and the maximum aggregate size. We advocate additional control joints 3 feet off and parallel to grade beams and foundation walls. BELOW-GRADE CONSTRUCTION We understand that a basement is proposed. Basement walls should be designed for lateral earth pressures. Walls that are restrained not allowing movement and mobilization of the internal soil strengths such, as basement walls, should be designed for at-rest lateral earth pressures. Walls that are allowed to deflect to mobilize internal soil strengths may be designed for active lateral earth pressures. Lateral earth pressure values are presented below and should be treated as equivalent fluid pressures. • At rest lateral earth pressure = 75 pcf • Active lateral earth pressure = 60 pcf • Passive lateral earth pressure = 200 pcf • Coefficient of friction between soil and concrete = 0 .2 60 Gardner Lane Battlement Mesa, Colorado GEG Job No. 2,935 0 0 0 D 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 D 0 D D 0 0 0 D The lateral earth pressures are dependent upon the type of backfill materials. The above lateral earth pressures are for walls backfilled with compacted onsite soils . The structural engineer should provide structural reinforcing design for walls supporting lateral soil loads. Prior to foundation wall backfill, foundation walls should be structurally braced top and bottom to prevent deflection from lateral soil loads. Foundation walls should also be backfilled with a COOT class 6 type road base. Water from surface irrigation of lawns and landscaping frequently flows through relatively permeable backfill placed adjacent to a residence and collects on the surface of relatively impermeable soils occurring at the bottom of the excavation. This can cause wet or moist basement conditions after construction and/or hydrostatic pressure in the wall backfill. A foundation drain should be installed to reduce the potential for hydrostatic pressures and provide a drained wall back fill condition. The provision of a drain will not eliminate potential slab movement. The drain should consist of a 4-inch diameter open joint or slotted pipe encased in free draining gravel. The drain should lead to a positive gravity outlet or to a sump where water can be removed by pumping. Typical foundation drain details are included as Figs . 12 and 13. ISO Gardner Lane Battlement Mesa, Colorado GEG Job No. 2,935 10 J l J J J 0 0 0 u l ·-' 0 u c J J J J CONCRETE One soils sample (TH-1 at 1-4 feet) was tested for water-soluble sulfates. This sample had a sulfate concentration of 7 ppm. Concentrations in this area have been shown to have a negligible to moderate effect on concrete that is exposed to the soils. It has been our experience that water soluble sulfate concentrations can change significantly in short distances. We recommend following the American Concrete Institute (ACI) recommendations for sulfate resistant cement. ACI recommends a Type V (sulfate resistant) cement be used for concrete that is exposed to soils that have a very severe effect on concrete. In addition, the concrete should have a water cement ratio of 0.45. We understand that Type V cement may not be locally available. Although, not meeting ACI recommendations for sulfate resistant cement, Type II mod ified cement has been used in similar conditions. SURFACE DRAINAGE Performance of foundations and concrete flatwork is influenced by surface moisture conditions. Risk of wetting foundation soils can be reduced by carefully planned and maintained surface drainage. Surface drainage should be designed to provide rapid runoff of surface water away from the proposed residence . We recommend the following 60 Gardner Lane Battlement Mesa, Colorado GEG Job No. 2,935 J l ., I ....J .., .J "l .J 0 0 0 l ..J 0 ...J 0 ~ J precautions be observed during construction and maintained at all times after the construction is completed . 1. 2. 3. 4 . 5 . The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be sloped to drain away from the building in all directions. We recommend a slope of at least 12 inches in the first 10 feet around the structure, where possible. In no case should the slope be less than 6 inches in the first 5 feet. The ground surface should be sloped so that water will not pond adjacent to the structure. Backfill around foundation walls should be moistened and compacted. Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill. Splash blocks and downspout extenders should be provided at all discharge points. Landscaping should be carefully designed to minimize irrigation. Plants used close to foundation walls should be limited to those with low moisture requirements; irrigated grass should not be located within 5 feet of the foundation. Sprinklers should not discharge within 5 feet of foundations. Irrigation should be limited to the minimum amount sufficient to maintain vegetation; application of more water will increase likelihood of slab and foundation movements. Impervious plastic membranes should not be used to cover the ground surface immediately surrounding the structure. These membranes tend to trap moisture and prevent normal evaporation from occurring. Geotextile fabrics can be used to limit the weed growth and allow for evaporation. 60 Gardner Lane Battlement Mesa, Colorado GEG Job No. 2,935 t 2 l 1 I J J J ., .J ] J J .., , I •J 0 0 J ] J CONSTRUCTION MONITORING Geotechnical Engineering Group, Inc. should be retained to provide general review of construction plans for compliance with our recommendations. Geotechnical Engineering Group, Inc. should be retained to provide construction-monitoring services during all earthwork and foundation construction phases of the work. This is to observe the construction with respect to the geotechnical recommendations, to enable design changes in the event that subsurface conditions differ from those anticipated prior to start of construction and to give the owner a greater degree of confidence that the structure is constructed in accordance with the geotechnical recommendations. LIMITATIONS The scope of services for this study does not include either specifically or by implication any environmental or biological (such as radon, mold, fungi, bacteria, etc.) assessment of the site or identification or prevention of pollutants, biological hazards, hazardous materials or conditions. If the owner is concerned about the potential for such contamination or pollution, other studies should be performed. 60 Gardner Lane BaWement Mesa, Colorado GEG Job No. 2,935 0 D D D D D 0 0 0 0 D 0 D 0 D 0 J J J The owner and builder are cautioned that this site contains soils which have swell potential. This report contains design and construction recommendations which are generally accepted to help mask the effects of swelling soils supporting the foundations but should not be interpreted as techniques to eliminate effects of swelling soils. The current and future owners must be aware that potential future movement from swelling soils is possible. Four exploratory test borings were observed and sampled. The test borings were representative of conditions encountered only at the exact boring locations. Variations in the subsoil conditions not indicated by the borings are always possible. Our representative should observe open foundation excavations to confirm subsurface conditions are as anticipated from the exploratory test pits and foundations are prepared as recommended herein. We should be called to observe foundation excavations, test subgrade soils and structural fill compaction. The scope of work performed is specific to the proposed construction and the client identified by this report. Any other use of the data, recommendations and design parameters (as applicable) provided within this report are not appropriate applications. Other proposed construction and/or reliance by other clients will require project specific review by this firm. Changes in site conditions can occur with time. Changes in standard 60 Gardner Lane Battlement Mesa, Colorado GEG Job No. 2,935 ..., J J J J n J J J ..J l of practice also occur with time. This report should not be relied upon after a period of three years from the date of this report and is subject to review by this firm in light of new information which may periodically become known. We believe this investigation was conducted in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily used by geotechnical engineers practicing in this area at this time. No other warranty, express or implied, is made. If we can be of further service in discussing the contents of this report or the analysis of the influence of the subsurface conditions on the design of the residence, please call. Sincerely, GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. Robert W. Anderson Project Engineer RWA:NWJ:tl (3 copies sent) 60 Gardner Lane Battlement Meea, Colorado GEG Job No. 2,935 Reviewed by: Norman W. Jo,h-~~ Senior Engi 15 J . 0 -, r-, ..J I .J c .....J 0 c c L 0 c Residential Soils Investigation Monument Ridge Subdivision 60 Gardner Lane Battlement Mesa, Colorado Job No. 2,935 Vicinity Map ~ • j ~ Mor r l~~n Fig. 1 -, ..., n ...J 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Note: This figure was prepared based on a drawing provided by Brian Trani and on notes obtained during our field study and is intended to show approximate locations of Exploratory Test Borings. Legend • Indicates approximate locations of Exploratory Test Borings Job No. 2,935 TH-1 Location of Exploratory Borings Fig. 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 J J KEY TO SYMBOLS Symbol Description Strata s ymbols clay, silty, sandy, cobbly, stiff to very stiff, s1iqht1y moist, brown to red, (CL) Misc. Symbols i Virtual Drill Rig Refusal Notes: 1. SB -Thinwa11 Tube Sample. 2. CT -MOdified California Barrel Sample. 3. STD -Standard Split Barrel Sample. 4. Bulk -Bulk Disturbed Sample. 5. 8/12 -Indicates 8 Blows with a 140 LB hammer falling 30 inches was required to drive the sample 12 inches. 6. Exploratory borings were drilled on 3-28-2008 using a 4-inch diameter continuous flight power auger. 7. These logs are subject to the interpretation by GEG of the soils encountered and limitations, conclusions, and recommendations in this report. Fi!=!ure 3 J J J ..... J J J J J J J J .., ..J l ~ .... t~nglnN•r•ng CLIENT: I (~c·o~c-r.~nic!a~ PROJECT: ..:6.::..0-=G:.:ar:..:d::.:;nc:.:.r...::L:::an:..::c'---------------PROJECT NO.: 2935 ·~ Groap. lnc-.LOCATIO_N_::s:c-c:F:i~g-u=~::2~~~~:::~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-E-L_E_V_A_T_I_O_N_:~~~U-n-k-oo-~-~~ LOG OF TEST BORING TH-1 DRILLER: ....:.;W:...:.J ________________ LOGGED BY: SP 0 DEPTH TO WATER> INITIAL: ~ None Found AFTER 24 HOURS: ~ Backfilled DATE: 3·28-2008 DEPTH TO CAVING: .f.. Description Clay, silty, sandy, cobbly, stiff to very stiff, slightly moist, brown to red, (CL) Bottom of boring when terminated: 16ft. Organics noted to .5 feet depth NO NO on Rock lndlcltlve of the site. FiQure 4 PAGE 1 of 1 l J J J J oJ ...J 1 J ....J 0 0 0 0 J J ~ .... IEng•nc•~t•r•ng CLIENT: I (~c~ot~r.!•nit•a! PROJECT: ~60.::....:::G.=arc::dn::.:e:.:...r.:::Lan=e-------------PROJECT NO.: 2935 ... f.; r 0 8 P • I 0 .-• LOCA TIO_N_: ~S~e-c:..-f:...:.-i:g-u=re-=-~2-=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=-~-E-L_E_V_A_T_I_O_N_: ___ U_n_kn_o_w_n __ LOG OF TEST BORING TH-2 DRILLER: """'W;.:;.J ________________ LOGGED BY: SP DEPTH TO WATER> INITIAL: ¥ None Found AFTER 24 HOURS: "$-Backfilled DATE: 3-28-2008 Description 0 Clay, silty, sandy, cobbly, very stiff, slightly moist, brown to red, (CL) Bottom ofboring when terminated: 16ft . Fi!=~ure 5 .!:! = a. !! (!) DEPTH TO CAVING: L. Organics noted to .5 feet depth 5017 lndlcltlve of the site. PAGE 1 of 1 J J l ., J J J .., .., J J l ....J J ll 0 0 D 0 0 ~ .... IEng•nt-t•r~ng CLIENT: I f; t•tt~t•c-!• n i t!a ~ PROJECT: ..::.60::....:::G::::ar:.:::d:.::ne:.:.r..:;L::::an:::e=---------------PROJECT NO.: 2935 ·~~roup. lnc-.LOCATIO_N_::s:e-e:F:i~g-u~r:e:2::::::::::::::::::::::::::::~-E-L_E_V_A_T_I_O_N_: ___ U_n_~-o-~--- LOG OF TEST BORING TH-3 DRILLER: ...:.W:..::.J ________________ LOGGED BY: SP 0 DEPTH TO WATER> INITIAL: ~ None Found AFTER 24 HOURS: ~ Bncklillcd DATE: 3-28-2008 DEPTH TO CAVING: ..C.. Description Clay, silty, sandy, cobbly, stiffto very stiff, slightly moist, brown to red, (CL) Bottom ofboring when tenninated: 16ft. This Information Organics noted to .5 feet depth 18/12 CT S0/1 No Recovery lndlcltive of the site. FiQure 6 PAGE 1 of 1 ..J .., J J J J 1 .J J J J J 0 0 0 0 t1 0 2935 ~Ill.. Englnc-c•r•ng CUENT: I (.ic·o~rr.~nlic~a~ PROJECT: ..::6.::..0..::G:.::nr:..:d::.:.ne::.:.r...::L:::n:.:.:nc:...._ _____________ PROJECT NO.: ·~ ~roap. lne.LOCATIO_N_::s:c-e:F:i~g-u;re:~2~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-E-L_E_V_A_T_I_O_N_:~~~~~-U=n:b:o:~====:: LOG OF TEST BORING TH-4 DRILLER: ..::W:.:.J _________________ LOGGED BY: ----=Sc:...P __ _ DEPTH TO WATER> INITIAL: ~ None Found AFTER 24 HOURS: ~ __ __...:::B=:ac~k::..:.lil:..:.:le:.::d __ _ DATE: 3-28-2008 DEPTH TO CAVING: ..C.. Description Notes 0 Clay, silty, sandy, stiff to very stiff, slightly moist, brown to red, (CL) Organics noted to .5 feet depth 50/11 CT 50/2 No Recovery Bottom of boring when terminated: 17 ft. FiQure 7 PAGE 1 of 1 D 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 • SWELL I CONSOLIDATION TEST REPORT -3 2 ·1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II I II I I "'l ) Tir~r~ 0 I' 11-;--WATER ADDED ~ ~ -2 3 ~ " I ~ -4 5 ~ \ 1: "'tJ ·~ I~ -6 (11 n en (11 c 7 ~ ;a Q) :I: ~ (11 Q) I~ i--8 OJ < a.. (11 9 i\ 1', -10 11 I -12 13 --14 15 I I I -16 17 1 2 5 10 20 50 100 200 500 1000 2000 Applied Pressure -psf Natural Dry Dens. LL PI Sp. Overburden Pc Cc Cr Swell Press. Heave Sat. I Moist. (pet) Gr. (psf) (psf) (psf) % eo 113.2 % 82.5 237 78 0.7 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION uses AASHTO Clay. silty, moist Project No. 2935 Client: Remarks: Project: 60 Gardner Lane Source: TH-1 Elev./Depth: 4 II Geoh•dmi.-.1 ~~nginc-c•ring f~roup. InC'. Figure 8 . I I I I I 1 ij SWELL I CONSOLIDATION TEST REPORT -1 1 >-.......1........_ I WATER ADDED i' ........ .... 3 " ~ 5 I} 7 ' 1: " ·n; ~ .... Ci5 ~ i: 9 (11 \) 0 .... (11 a.. 11 13 I 15 17 I ' ~ 19 100 I 200 500 1000 2000 Applied Pressure -psf Natural Dry Dens. LL PI Sp. Overburden Pc Cc Cr Swell Press. Sat. I Moist. (pcf) Gr. (psf) (psf) (psf) I 11.6 % 94.7 520 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION uses Clay, silty, moist Project No. 2935 Client: Remarks: Project: 60 Gardner Lane Source: TH-2 Elev./Depth: 9 II G••••tnhnil'lll ~~ nginl!l!ri ng t:roup. In~. -o --2 --4 --6 "'0 --8 (!) n CD :::l -::I: CD Ill --10 < CD --12 --14 --16 l --18 Heave % eo -1.7 AASHTO Figure 9 -0 .015 15 Results j C, psi 1.51 -0 .01 t),deg 17.8 Tan( ell) 0.32 c::: 1 c: -0 005 v ·-10 0 ·c;; :;::> / c. I'll oo ..... I/ 2 ui E C/1 J2 0 ...__ ..._/ ~ Ql / 0 \ en iii e.<¢1 "-----'(ij ----u u. --'E 0005 ~ 5 ----~"""' Ql > ~ ~ 0 01 3 .----1 0 .015 0 35 7 10 5 14 0 5 10 15 Strain,% Normal Stress, psi 30 Sample No. 1 2 3 Water Content, % 9.3 9.3 9.3 25 Dry Density, pcf 85.6 85.6 85.6 iii Saturation, % 26.5 26.5 26.5 ::::0 20 :s Void Ratio 0.9315 0.9315 0.9315 ·c;; c. Diameter, in. 1.94 1.94 1.94 ui C/1 Heiaht in. 1.00 1.00 1.00 .§: 15 -3 en ~ ,... Water Content, % 26.2 26.2 26.2 ... I'll v 2 Dry Density, pcf 85.6 85.6 85.6 Ql .s::. .... Cll en 10 ~ Saturation, % 74.6 74.6 74.6 f '/ <( Void Ratio 0.9315 0.9315 0.9315 v--1 ~ Diameter. in. 1.94 1.94 1.94 5 t=/ Height in . 1.00 1.00 1.00 Normal Stress, psi 3.50 6.90 10.40 0 Fail. Stress, psi 2.64 3.72 4.86 0 5 10 15 20 Strain,% 2.6 0.5 0.5 Strain,% Ult. Stress, psi Strain,% Strain rate , in /m [n . 0.63 0.63 0.63 Sample Type: CT Client: Description: Project: 60 Gardner Lane Assumed Specific Gravity= 2.65 Source of Sample: TH-2 Depth: 2 Remarks: Proj. No.: 2935 Date Sampled: 4-2-2008 Figure 11 l l 4oll'oterhninl -~ngin•·ll'ring Group. InC!. Tested By: A,_,_l ---------Checked By: !.:.M,_,_T ________ _ J I ' J _J J ., J _; ~ J ., J J , .J l J J ] I ) • • -- • -• • Parcel Detail Page 1 of3 Garfield County Assessor/Treasurer Parcel Detail Information A.ssessorffrel!_Sur~r.PmpertySearc~_h I t\~_s_~s~_p_r_S_l.!.Q~_~t Qu_eJY-I Ass _e_ss.or_Sales_S.earch Clerk & Recorder Reception Searqb. BasiJ: Building .Chru:acteri_s.ti_cs I T~ lnt:o_lJll_ati_on p_~cel D~tail I v_~l_y_~Det~jl I S_~ks_:Oe~U I R~sic;l_e_ntial/Commercial Improvement Detail Land Detail I Photographs I Mill Le w Rev~pues_Q_etrul. I Tax Area II Account Number II Parcel Number II 2007 Mill Levy J I 027 II R042705 II 240720226005 II 36.402 I Owner Name and Mailing Address !TRANI, BRIAN S 1047 BRYAN LOOP !PARACHUTE, CO 81635 Assessor's Parcel Description (Not to be used as a legal description) lsECT,TWN,RNG:20-7-95 SUB:MONUMENT !RIDGE SUB-DIV LOT:S PRE:R008688 IANDrrHRU:A ro:R008689 BK:0552 IPG:0092 BK:0464 PG:0585 BK:0336 IPG:0272 RECPT:738233 BK:l787 IPG:0330 RECPT:695571 BK: 1781 PG:6 IRECPT:694232 BK:1777 PG:48 IRECPT:693414 BK:1753 PG:674 IRECPT:688073 BK: 1753 PG:672 IRECPT:688072 BK:1714 PG:360 IRECPT:679636 BK:1712 PG:903 IRECPT:679338 BK:1712 PG:873 IRECPT:679337 BK:l712 PG:872 IRECPT:679336 BK:l712 PG:849 IRECPT:679335 BK:1426 PG:l32 http://www.garcoact.com/assessor/parcel.asp?ParcelNurnber=240720226005 I I I 6/26/2008 Parcel Detail IRECPT:618487 BK:1426 PG:128 I IRECPT:618486 BK:1415 PG:533 I IRECPT:616317 BK:1369 PG:103 IRECPT:606907 BK:1363 PG:284 IRECPT:605346 BK:1213 PG:17 IRECPT:570989 BK:1213 PG:16 IRECPT:570988 BK:1213 PG:15 IRECPT:2709S7 BK:OS42 PG:0703 IBK:0834 PG:0445 BK:0834 PG:0434 IBK:0744 PG:0510 BK:0672 PG:0007 Location Physical Address: 1160 303 COUNTY RD PARACHUTE Subdivision: IIMONUMENT RIDGE SUB-DIV Land Acres: 117.427 Land Sq Ft: llo Section II Townshi~ II Range 20 II 7 II 95 I 2008 Property Tax Valuation Information II Actual Value II Assessed Value I Land: II 21oll sol Improvements: II oil ol Total: II 21oll sol Additional Value Detail Most Recent Sale Sale Date: 111119/2007 ~==================~! Sale Price: llt30,000 Additional Sales Detail Basic Building Characteristics Number of Residentiallo Buildings: I http://www.garcoact.com/assessor/parcel.asp?ParcelNumber=240720226005 Page 2 of3 6/26/2008 Parcel Detail Number of Co~I?IIndllo Buddmgs: No Building Records Found Tax Information Tax Year Transaction Ty(!e 2007 Tax Payment: Whole 2007 Tax Payment: Whole 2007 Tax Amount 2007 Tax Amount 2006 Tax Payment: Whole 2006 Tax Payment: Whole 2006 Tax Amount 2006 Tax Amount 2005 Tax Payment: Whole 2005 Tax Amount )'op_ofPag~ II Amount I ($5.00)1 ($2.92)1 $5.ool I $2.921 ($5.00)1 ($2.92)1 $5.ool $2.921 ($10.68)1 $10.681 As~ssor Database Search Options I Treasurer Qa,_taba~_S_e!U'ch Qp_ti_ons Cler}c_~_Recor_der_Da4l]J~~_search_Qption~ Garfield CountY. H_Q:tn~ Pag~ Page 3 of3 The Garfield County Assessor and Treasurer's Offices make every effort to collect and maintain accurate data. However, Good Turns Software and the Garfield County Assessor and Treasurer's Offices are unable to warrant any of the information herein contained. Copyright © 2005 -2008 Good Turns Software. All Rights Reserved. Database & Web Design by Go_o_d_"[urns_S_oft.w.ctte. http:/ /www.garcoact.com/assessor/parcel.asp?ParcelNumber=240720226005 6/26/2008 Date: February 1, 2010 To: Brian Trani 1900 CR306 Parachute, CO 81635 Dear Permit Holder, Garfield County BUILDING & PLANNING DEPARTMENT Please refer to your building permit number 11026 , issued 7/21/2008 A routine review of our open building permits indicates that we have not received a request for an inspection on this permit since 10117/2008 Please be advised that building permits expire, per Uniform Building Code, section 106.4.4 or lnernational Code Sections 105.5 "Every permit issued by the building official under the provisions of this code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by such permit is not commenced within 180 days from the date of such permit or if the buliding or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned at any time after the work has commenced for a period of 180 days. Before such work can be recommenced, a new permit shall first be obtained to do so, and the fee therefore shall be one half the amount required for a new permit for such work, provided no changes have been made or will be made in the oritinal plans and specifications for such work, and provided further that such suspension or abandonement has not exceeded one year. ln order to renew action or a permit after expiration, the permittee shall pay a new full permit fee . • Please contact this office at your very earliest convenience, in writing, to advise us about the status of your permitted work. If you have not responded within thirty (30) days from the receipt of this notice the permit will be closed and a permanent notation will be placed in the property records at the County Clerk & recorders office that indicates that the work permitted per Colorado Revised Statues 30·28·205 & 210, was not inspected, is not approved and the building or area is illegal to occupy and is subject to legal abatement action or other option available by law. Thank you for your cooperation . Jim Wilson Building Inspector 108 Eighth Street, Suite 401 • Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 (970) 945-8212 • (970) 285-7972 • Fax: (970) 384-3470 Brian Trani 60 Gardner Lane Parachute, CO 81635 97D-319-3932 To: Garfield County Building and Planning RE: Permit Number 11026, 2012 Progress Update fb.5s) 13' ~ £. ;dsr.' ;!71 ~£jJ January 7th, 2012 This letter is a statement of progress made on my residence since the last final septic inspection was completed April4m, 2012. I continue to work diligently and continue making progress each month towards the completion of our home. • April 2012-Complete IS OS septic system. • May 2012-Excavate toNE of house to prepare for utility ditches. Finish all decking and porch posts. • June 2012-Water well electric final Inspection passed and well pump control system installed. • July 2012-Rough electrical passed. Electric main panel in basement. a stem pump and switching. • August 2012-Utilities: Gas, electric, water, ran to house, backfilled. • September 2012-Finish curtain walls, closets, misc. framing. • October 2012-Complete continuous soffit/ eve ventilation. • November 2012-Mount boiler, complete flu venting and boiler electric. Install water softener. • December 2012-Complete gas piping, plumbing for boiler, radiant slab heat functioning. • January 2013-Finish drain and vent plumbing w/ exception of traps under tubs. • Currently-Pex water lines pulled and ready for fittings. Thank you for continuing to work with us on this owner built and "out of pocket'' financed project. We are currently estimating that we will be ready for plumbing, gas piping, and rough mechanical inspection in the first half of February. Sincerely, Brian Trani Owner I Builder \Tt!W'-""'G-~r ,t.tJIJ. E"X(!'<VA-T~ , t:tLL/4Eil, Au .. vr••L•TtE;. '"'"·· 3"vi'E J.tJ/1... ';-"j_...,....~ .• ...:.. .· ---'~~~ • --.._~"'~c~-.. ~~;..-4. .. t ; ·-. . ... -·~"'-. ~~.; .. :;._ -"" -~·-·~~~ •. ,~ ~~,. ~-·~ .. ;~--~·:· ''"~ • •..;t-'": • .. ... -.... IJI'A'1'eA L\1,:,'-, Fi.ln,lt IO ~"'lAitt~ I f Ul.vrtetJLJ. To CtSTEq.l fM/ PJ&#P,t:Ot-7' A" G4Cr :l ()I 1. ;r'Vi-y Zt~IL ,N/Er'l(. .r,vsrAl&ei> (;.A~ t.fiVE -S"TARr .. ~~ Ho,t.E ~~ W/S"-W'I'ITC.I/IAI~ ~~ /'(/.NI/' I ·' ~ ~ ~ ' ~ '0 "' ~ r) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ' ~ r ~ ~ •• N ~ s ~ l ~ 1 4 ~ ~ ."-1 .... 1'\ C) ~ ~ l::. ~ {\ 1\ ~ l -1 .. Owner-Builder: Brian Trani 45 Pinetree PL, Parachute, CO 81635 Home: 970-285-9016 Cell: 970-319-3932 February 15,2010 RE: Building Permit# 11026 I LOT 5 Monument Ridge Subd. /60 Gardner lane Battlement Mesa Dear Garfield County Building Planning, I understand that the county has guidelines for continuous progress being made on a dwelling while under the permit process. My situation is somewhat unique in that I have designed, built, and financed the structure on my own. I did pay for the labor for the concrete work and have just paid to have the metal put on the roof. With those two exceptions I have set off on this project single handed and with cash out of pocket. For this reason it is taking far longer than the average 30 year mortgage /6 man crew approach. I consulted with you before starting the project and have been appreciative of the county allowing me to do this. I have been in constant contact with the local home owner's association who have also been very agreeable to my building my own home. I come from an engineering and construction background and can assure you all construction is per code and per approved drawings. Finally, I would like to give a brieftimeline of progress so far and progress planned. HISTORY 0712008: Permit approved 08/2008: 24inch 95% compacted road base appvd. by geotechnical engineering I excavation complete 09/2008: underground plumbing install, septic tank install, footer forms install, 1012008: underground plumbing inspection complete, rebar form inspection complete, footers poured 11/2008: walls and slab concrete poured, basement load bearing and perimeter walls complete 12/2008: first main floor joists and ¥-t" TnG floor complete 03/2009: first floor walls started 04/2009: first floor exterior walls complete 05/2009: first floor overhead load bearing beams installed, second floor plywood floor complete 06/2009: second floor load bearing and perimeter walls complete 07/2009: stairs installed, truss order arrived, begin install of roof 09/2009: trusses and 5/8 plywood roof complete 12/2009: facia complete, roof vents complete, ice shield on perimeters and valleys, felt underlayment complete 01/2010: metal roof installed I •' PLAN FORWARD 04/201 0: windows installed 05/20 I 0: porches installed, call for framing inspection Garfield county 06/20 10: exterior siding complete 07/2010: call state electrical inspection for underground electric, begin all underground utility work 08/201 0: complete water, electric, gas utility work into mechanical room of basement 09/201 0: complete septic drain field get Letter of design and Letter of final inspection and Stamp-ISDS 10/2010: complete plumbing, call for plumbing inpection 11/201 0: electrical complete, state electrical inspection complete 0112011: complete HVAC system 02/2011: insulation, vapor barrier, call for inspection 03/2011: min reqs met for occupancy sign off, kitchen, bath, sealed floors, cabinets, etc. (move into basement) 07/2011 : all floors complete 09/2011 : sheetrock and painting complete 1 0/2011: all bathrooms and appliances installed 1112011: cabinets, trim work, complete 12/2011: Estimated Date ofTotal Completion In summary, I am planning on having the exterior complete by summer and be working on getting utilities in. including tying into the shared water well. As soon as the porches are on this spring I can call for the framing inspection. I am waiting for spring so I can get the best possible concrete pour on the porch footings. We want to have occupancy in a completed basement with kitchenette by March next year and then complete the dwelling once we are moved in. Again thank you for your cooperation. Please note our mailing address change at the head of this letter. Since~ ~-~~ Brian Trani m ~ ~l ~ ~~ ~~ ~· ~ ~ I , J ~ ~ \1) •l.i ~ ~ 0,(_ ~ ~ ~ V\ k ~ ~ ...... ~ '\ ~ J .... ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~~: . ·' ~~ .'VI i ·" ~ ';' ~ ,. "' I("' <r ,/ t ..,. /o1f ... .. ,;,: .~ :':'1 i.l,. ll! ~~ IN ::.4 It' ,.., .< . I .. tl ~~ i• ~, .~ . t '1 ') ~' \ / . ;:> .. •I j • ~ PEe c;erq 3:1 mrtJnc Sh eJ old!J D iO t-/!J lj ~ITE . H lifE Is a au tfl)C 1-pic t{J Job 5itf: 1-/o J:A. ~ u, ~ q/t01./( (~ u ~/ l?t.cp4:2 Jj~?; j~ -~ M2 ~-'?· -(j-'1-:-c.,;L "~ ~ Liek~ ~G y -;~;;"'#- No . ..._ ______ 1~1~02=6~1~40~5 Assessor's Parcel No. 2407-202-28..005 . . Date __ Z..ul..,21wi200,._8 __ _ BUILDING PERMIT CARD Job Address __ 00ltJUi80!¥" ~CwRultK0~3.o,.~E:;JIIIarae!IJUI::u.blllute1151: . ..:.· .u:MLII!ounlllumiUgoll&llot...llRwkl~g151e..,. L-.ou.t ..~~~.& _____________ _ Owner ____ _,_I::::ra~n:~~.l • .e:B:.L:!rtal!Sl. "~------Address 47 Bryan Loop. P 'chute Phone# 1W)..948..&38iJ F Contractor Owner Address same Phone # ----- Setbacks: Front Rear RH LH Zoning---- slf dwelling on finished bsmt w/ covered dec INSPECTIONS Solis Test Weatherproofing __________ _ Footing m q;.DS •iJB -Mechanical ___________ _ Foundation : 9-J!f-t'B/JYif.; Electrical Rough (State) _______ _ Grout Electrical Final (State) ________ _ Underground Plumbing IP-/7-0lr t;(.«) Final /Checklist Completed? __ _ Rough Plumbing Certificate Occupancy # -------- Framing Date __________ _ Insulation Septic System ~~----------- Roofing Date -----------Drywall Final __________ _ Gas Piping Other-------------- NOTES (continue on back) 1 08 8th St., Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado Phone(970)945-8212 Job located at tZO 0(2. Ctf_. 3o3 4 Permit No. // c:>Z.. 0 , I have this day inspected this structure and these premises and found the following corrections needed : D Call for Re-lnsp ection D $50.00 Re-lnspection Fee must be paid prior to Re-lnspection You are hereby notified that the above correction must be inspected before covering. When correction(s) have been made, call for Inspection at 970-384-5003. Date -+----~~----~~~ Building Inspector -('=z=:;~~Q...:;_C4,.£;...4..~~=~-.,;:a........_ Phone (970) 945-8212 CE 108 8th St., Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado Phone(970)945-8212 Job located at !X.2_(0 0 C1J2 3Q3 Permit No. \ \ D~(, I have this day inspected this structure and these premises and found the following corrections needed: ~ ~~-~~--~~ ~~~~ -.-p ~ ~· ~ ~ ~- azz:A ~ (##-~ ~-~ Ol---~& ):JUI/7 ~dk I Q Call for Re-lnspecti oo __ Q $50.00 Re-lnspe ction Fee must be pa i d prior to Re-lnspection You are hereby notified that the abov e correcti on must be inspected before covering. When correction(s) have b een made, ca ll for inspection at 970-384-5003. Date 9-8 20 ~ Building Inspector ~~ Phone (970) 945-8212 J COUNTY OF GARFIELD -BUILDING DEPARTMENT COR RE C TION N OTICE 1 08 8th St., Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado Phone (970) 945-8212 Job located at ~ CLCJ c;.,.o ~ ~ 3 Permit No. 1/0C) ~ I have this day inspected this structure and these P-remises and fouod the followin~tlons needed: ) ~ry )1110~ :s ezadc ·--___ r{)~ g_5_ ~ ~ -~ _r:rn-1 •-~ ~ --~----~~ i d t::>/-;:1-. ~for Re-lnspection ~-~- Q $50.00 Re-lnspectl on Fee must be paid prior to Re-lnspection You are hereby notified that the above correction must be inspected before covering. When correctlon(s) have been made, call for inspection at 970-384-5003. Date ~ K 20 _cB-=--..,.-- Buildlng Inspector )(JJA}t;tj7?Jp~ Phone (970) 945-8212