Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication- PermitGARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING, SANITATION, and PLANNING DEPARTMENT 109 Sth, Street, Suite 303 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601(970) 945-8213 No, 7896 Job Address St Ftln nn RCXXA. l A.._bo o. j, Nature of Work Building Permit; Use of Building S tm , tech c Owner , -)1A.l,�,RAA Contractor Ars-u. r LYv' Amount of Permits ] y 1 �o Date_ _ _ _ _ CQ_ 0 ?c2K13. `7 1 1� Clerk 1 GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION GARFIELD COUNTY (OLENWOOD $PRINOS). COLORADO =PHONE: (970) 9454212 TOB ADDRESS: INSPECTION UNE: (970) 384-5003 PERMIT NO. �%R1 PARCEL/SCHEDULE NO. F�'nribac Q RJ . Cathondak. Cbh'16c),-3 IArI No. 2 ° eAYAI1E1) BLOCK NO. BUBDWI1ION/EX P'TION S T, F,W / torgrAcrui8iej alas loACIMICTINCESIR i»7 J /. '°"333 MOW/9r .57xv01Asi "+o- :222.""`222 "�3�� ordt= " h3-3706 ""°. / c!1_S ALp1M WC ROI $ 11(1. Pt CrIltatel0 •.Oe 1.002.4,67 '"°`LOT 13 I, oo 2f51 �aawuau 2_ 1011111CNIC Iran: B //6 smocE F4'V/I _y RES CIALI IATIOK ellOCOM MUMS 9 '10 600,00o COIN MI IMAM MIMI& oR1l1Mx AUMIM VAWA M" 3i 9,c130 .01) NOTI A UPARA1i SLSCTRICAL PERMIT 11 RBQIIIRBD AND MIT 1ieUSD BY MB COLORADO. THIS mom BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR commucnoN AUTUORIZED IB NOT COMMENCED slim 110 DAYS. OR IF CONSTRUCTION CSA WORK IS IMPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A MUM OF 110 DAYS AT ANY MO AFTER WORK IS OOH. L HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND IDCAMINED 1WI APPLICATION AND SNOW THE GAME TO BE 'TRUE AND comm. AIL PROVISIONS OF LAWS GOVERNING TES TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED WITH WHETHER SPECIPOD i®REn 01 NOT. TIN GRANTING OF A PERMIT DORS NOT PRESUME TO GIVE MIMEIIY TO VIOLATE CIRCANCEL THE PROVISIONS OP ANY O11ItiR STATE OR LOCAL LAW 'ENO CONSTRUCTION OR THE PERFORMANCE OF ATB OS PLAN CHECK 0113.1( PERMIT a67.2 TOTAL FEE:7 1 , DATE PERART ISSUED: OCC: CROUP: /] R I f ( CONST;TYI'A MANU. OMB: AGREEMENT. IIEROSBION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO THE APPLICANT AS OWNER CONTRACTOR AND/OR THE AGENT OF THE CONTRACTOR. OR OWNER TO CON6TRUCT THE STAUCLURE A8 1am=ONPLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS ATO AND REVIEWED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. N OONSIDERATKN 0 THB MIAMI OF TILT PERMIT, THE SIGNER HEREBY / B TO COMPLY WITH AIL BUILDING DOOMS AND LAND USE REGULATION' ION' ADOPTED By IMP= COUNTY PURSUANT TO AVIUORflY GIVEN IN 30.28201 CRS AS AMENDED. THB SIGNER FURTHER ACMES THAT W THE ABOVE SAID ORDINANCES ARE NOTFULLY Me= WITH 1N THE LOCATION. ERBCl7ON. CONSTRUCTS:N AND USE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED STRUCTURE. THE PERMIT MAY THEN BE REVOKED BY NOT= PROM {+� OOUNTy AND THAT THEN AND THERE IT SHALL BECOME NULL AND VOID. LTTE ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT BASED UPON AANR SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA SHALL NOT PREVENT THE BUADI4G OFpICIAL FOOM 7HBREAFrBR RBgR}1L D10 i8B ]ORRLLCTLOW CF ERRORS IN SAID PLATO, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA OR FRO PREVENN1NG BUIIDD1G OPERATION BED1O CAMEO ON THEREUNDER WHEN !N / ATSON OF THIS CODE OR ANY OTHER ORDINANCE OR REGULATION OF 111111 1[auSD1C170N. ME REVIEW OF 7E BUBMI1170 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND DNSPECLIONI CONDUCTED THEREAFTER DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ACCEPTANCE OF ANY tEBTONSIBI ITIDB OR L]ABLdTIE8 BY WIRFIELD COUNTY FOR ERRORS. OMISSIONS OR DIB RSEPANCIEB. THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THESE ITEMS AND DIPLEMENTATION DURING CONSTRUCTION RESTS SPECIFICAILY WITH THE ARCRiTIBCT, DESIGNER. BUILDER AND OWNER. COTAMENTS ARE INTENDED VATLVEAND LAI SUPPORT W111 OWNERS DITERBBT. lorkamua6 IHEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE wanzroacr ABOVE. (INITIAL) J:400( Ofr g4G0?4‘e4F4e SETBACKS: c G. t',F r IRDS NO. *FEE: Ark-. QVIr 5;11 laya• uo i igloo The following items are required by Garfield County for a final inspection: 1. A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector; 2. Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department posted where readily visible from access road; 3. A finished roof, a lockable house, complete exterior siding, exterior doors and windows installed, a complete kitchen with cabinets, a sink with hot & cold running water, non-absorbent Idtchen floor coverings, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove and refrigerator, all necessary plumbing; 4. A complete bathroom, with wash bowl, tub or shower, toilet stool, hot and cold running water, non-absorbent floors and walls finished and a privacy door; 5. All steps outside or inside over three (3) steps must have handrails, guard rails on balconies or decks over 30" high constructed to all 1994 UBC requirements; 6. Outside grading done to where water will detour away from the building; 7. Exceptions to the outside steps, decks and grading may be made upon the demonstration of extenuating circumstances, i.e. weather, but a Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until all the required items are completed and a final inspection made. A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. * * * *CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (C.O.) IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATION PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET. I understand and agree to abide by the above conditions for occupancy, use and the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the dwelling under building permit # 7 8 7 h . it- z 7 "..r'a Date ISI I rL.n y 6 S S+, F r.Y+b4R ftcl . C'Ggqi 1,0f Si-. Fr r. +n bayZ 6(Atoc cuweit 2-6z uPP S.C_6vcGti3c lk 69 G A.tk-C2 S G /� ce 2 t `._ra.00 1 c 3 x.00 !0 36X 00 LF37s-fq 30.00 22G7, 2..,$` Garfield County Building &Planning Department Planning Department February 27, 2001 Horizon Construction Re: Niro Building permit Lot 2 St. Finnbar Subdivision Prior to Performing and Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for this residence, HP Geotech must provide Garfield County with a written statement of certification (stamped) verifying that the house and garage were built in accordance to the recommendations submitted within the engineers report submitted with the building application. Thank you, Arno Ehlers Chief Building Official 109 8th Street, Suite 303 9454212/285-7972 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Jan -25--03 02:56A Thomas Yo=;urn HIRED GUN SURVEYING PO. BOX 9 SNO IAASS,as B1658 9700232794 January 24, 2001 970-923-7831 P.01 Dear Garfield County Planning Department, Cast Carmichael have reviewed the building location as staked on Lot 2, St. Finnbar Farre and confirm that it is within the building envelope as stated on the final plat of St. Finnbar Farm Suudivisuon in the County of Garfieki, Ste of Colorado. Sincerely, etsat N' r•• 24303 '- Carl R. Carmichael • LS# 24303 t 2S Q% •• , %%%P. ,gk /607f7 Obi //ye__ f%% /1//i/77,47,/5 ,62# z2/l�4 %// /E Z/e-Z 747 rm ..619,//7/_. X V/ 17//96- ef>21,t3 ‘‘,/e10/4 Ce/67 44,165 i=:„e T/"5 �• a/s`6,w 257 e 47-7 a 22 fimi-�e,e 5, / s //7 no �r/95 s W/7// 77/6 r4i1vrelZ 6' 2 exe'22/69-iC C/ /7'.1-c9 /'7 77V, ,/y/47//, 7,e/9 De; .,L 1$'496 707 & 4'CC /707 e'-47 T C -r.17.5 io /./-",/61/9i e j,/ c/' // / 4CT/a)-i 777`,s /4eoj e t?. v Jew i * Coo £ /n'7 iG,Mie CDG /1"57---,9,,D eC-'?9 ¢6is c27 -P1 7/7/ / T &" C kV ,C & ?56 e < /2M/eg X/TTG 6- c c/fG4/,? G 4A",te/96 J LIT %f9 Le- /"-rv' DF X 4-54e T (922- 4 701' o v��'/py � y //77---e---‘,44/7 y 06C/re..5 /472/2:07/ a-,7757-2‘/e77c?j f37c.5 727- 536/ Gtech Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. 5020 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Phone: 970-945-7988 Fax: 970-945-8454 hpgeo@hpgeotech.com SUBSOIL STUDY FOR FOUNDATION DESIGN PROPOSED RESIDENCE LOT 2, ST. FINNBAR FARM SUBDIVISION GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO JOB NO. 100 880 NOVEMBER 14, 2000 PREPARED FOR: HORIZON CONSTRUCTION ATTN: BUTCH ZIGURES 222 RONCE LANE CARBONDALE, COLORADO 81623 HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. November 14, 2000 Horizon Construction Attn: Butch Zigures 222 Ronce Lane Carbondale, Colorado 81623 Job No. 100 880 Subject: Report Transmittal, Subsoil Study for Foundation Design, Proposed Residence, Lot 2, St. Finnbar Farm Subdivision, Garfield County, Colorado. Dear Mr. Zigures: As requested, we have conducted a subsoil study for the proposed residence at the subject site. Subsurface conditions encountered in the exploratory borings drilled in the proposed building area consist of about V2 to.1 foot of topsoil overlying relatively dense slightly silty sandy gravel with cobbles and boulders. Groundwater was encountered in Boring 2 at a depth of 7' feet below the ground surface at the time of drilling. The proposed residence can be founded on spread footings placed on the natural gravel subsoils and designed for an allowable bearing pressure of 4,000 psf. The excavation should be kept relatively shallow to avoid construction below the groundwater level. The report which follows describes our exploration, summarizes our findings, and presents our recommendations. It is important that we provide consultation during design, and field services during construction to review and monitor the implementation of the geotechnical recommendations. If you have any questions regarding this report, please contact us. Sincerely, HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. Re JZ . by: SLP /ksw TABLE OF CONTENTS PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY 1 PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION 1 SITE CONDITIONS 2 SUBSIDENCE POTENTIAL 2 FIELD EXPLORATION 2 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 3 DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS 3 FOUNDATIONS 3 FLOOR SLABS 4 SURFACE DRAINAGE 5 LIMITATIONS 5 FIGURE 1- LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIGURE 2 - LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIGURE 3 - LEGEND AND NOTES FIGURE 4 - GRADATION TEST RESULTS TABLE I - SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS H -P GEOTECH PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY This report presents the results of a subsoil study for a proposed residence to be located on Lot 2, St. Finnbar Farm Subdivision, Garfield County, Colorado. The project site is shown on Fig. 1. The purpose of the study was to develop recommendations for the foundation design. The study was conducted in accordance with our agreement for geotechnical engineering services to Horizon Construction dated October 30, 2000. Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. previously conducted a preliminary geotechnical study for the subdivision and presented our findings in a report dated August 4, 1998, Job No. 198 483. A field exploration program consisting of exploratory borings was conducted to obtain information on subsurface conditions. Samples of the subsoils obtained during the field exploration were tested in the laboratory to determine their classification and other engineering characteristics. The results of the field exploration and laboratory testing were analyzed to develop recommendations for foundation types, depths and allowable pressures for the proposed building foundation. This report summarizes the data obtained during this study and presents our conclusions, design recommendations and other geotechnical engineering considerations based on the proposed construction and the subsoil conditions encountered. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION The proposed residence will be a two story wood frame structure with an attached garage. Ground floor will be slab -on -grade elevated slightly above the existing ground surface. Grading for the structure is assumed to be relatively minor with cut depths between about 3 to 4 feet. We assume relatively light foundation loadings, typical of the proposed type of construction. If building loadings, location or grading plans change significantly from those described above, we should be notified .to re-evaluate the recommendations contained in this report. H -P GEOTECH 2 SITE CONDITIONS The site was vacant and covered with patches of snow at the time of our field work. The ground surface is relatively flat with a gentle slope down to the south. There is about 3 to 4 feet of elevation difference across the site. Vegetation consists of large cottonwood and evergreen trees with an understory of grass and weeds. Cobbles and boulders are exposed on the ground surface. SUBSIDENCE POTENTIAL Bedrock of the Pennsylvanian age Eagle Valley Evaporite underlies the St. Finnbar Farm Subdivision. These rocks are a sequence of gypsiferous shale, fine- grained sandstone/siltstone and limestone with some massive beds of gypsum. There is a possibility that massive gypsum deposits associated with the Eagle Valley Evaporite underlie portions of the lot. Dissolution of the gypsum under certain conditions can cause sinkholes to develop and can produce areas of localized subsidence. Sinkholes were not observed in the immediate area of the subject lot. No evidence of cavities was encountered in the subsurface materials; however, the exploratory borings were relatively shallow, for foundation design only. Based on our present knowledge of the subsurface conditions at the site, it cannot be said for certain that sinkholes will not develop. The risk of future ground subsidence on Lot 2 throughout the service life of the proposed residence, in our opinion, is low; however, the owner should be made aware of the potential for sinkhole development. If further investigation of possible cavities in the bedrock below the site is desired, we should be contacted. FIELD EXPLORATION The field exploration for the project was conducted on November 6, 2000. Two exploratory borings were drilled at the locations shown on Fig. 1 to evaluate the subsurface conditions. The borings were advanced with 4 inch diameter continuous flight augers powered by a truck -mounted Longyear BK-51HD drill rig. The borings were logged by a representative of Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. H -P GEOTECF{ 3 Samples of the subsoils were taken with a 13/a inch I.D. spoon sampler. The sampler was driven into the subsoils at various depths with blows from a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches. This test is similar to the standard penetration test described by ASTM Method D-1586. The penetration resistance values are an indication of the relative density or consistency of the subsoils. Depths at which the samples were taken and the penetration resistance values are shown on the Logs of Exploratory Borings, Fig. 2. The samples were returned to our laboratory for review by the project engineer and testing. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Graphic logs of the subsurface conditions encountered at the site are shown on Fig. 2. The subsoils consist of about ' to 1 foot of topsoil overlying relatively dense, slightly silty sandy gravel containing cobbles and boulders. Drilling in the dense gravel with auger equipment was difficult due to the cobbles and boulders and drilling refusal was encountered in Boring 1 at a depth of 51/2 feet. A boring drilled on the lot as part of the preliminary studyencountered similar soils to the drilled depth of 10 feet. Laboratory testing performed on samples obtained from the borings included natural moisture content and gradation analyses. Results of gradation analyses performed on small diameter drive samples (minus 11/2 inch fraction) of the natural coarse granular soils are shown on Fig. 4. The laboratory testing is summarized in Table I. Groundwater was encountered in Boring 2 at a depth of 71 at the time of drilling. The upper soils were slightly moist to moist. The depth to water in the previous boring drilled on the lot was at 61/2 feet when checked on November 9, 2000. DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS FOUNDATIONS Considering the subsoil conditions encountered in the exploratory borings and the nature of the proposed construction, we recommend the building be founded with H -P GEOTECH 4 spread footings bearing on the natural granular soils. The excavation should be kept relatively shallow to avoid construction below the groundwater level. The design and construction criteria presented below should be observed for a spread footing foundation system. 1) Footings placed on the undisturbed natural granular soils should be designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of 4,000 psf. Based on experience, we expect settlement of footings designed and constructed as discussed in this section will be about 1 inch or less. 2) The footings should have a minimum width of 16 inches for continuous walls and 2 feet for isolated pads. 3) Exterior footings and footings beneath unheated areas should be provided with adequate soil cover above their bearing elevation for frost protection. Placement of foundations at least 36 inches below exterior grade is typically used in this area. 4) Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span local anomalies such as by assuming an unsupported length of at least 10 feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining structures should also be designed to resist a lateral earth pressure corresponding to an equivalent fluid unit weight of 45 pcf for the on-site granular soils, excluding oversized rock, as backfill. 5) The topsoil and any loose or disturbed soils should be removed and the footing bearing level extended down to relatively dense natural granular soils. If water seepage is encountered, the footing areas should be dewatered before concrete placement. 6) A representative of the geotechnical engineer should observe all footing excavations prior to concrete placement to evaluate bearing conditions. FLOOR SLABS The natural on-site soils, exclusive of topsoil, are suitable to support lightly loaded slab -on -grade construction. To reduce the effects of some differential movement, floor slabs should be separated from all bearing walls and columns with expansion joints which allow unrestrained vertical movement. Floor slab control joints M -P GEOTECH 5 should be used to reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking. The requirements for joint spacing and slab reinforcement should be established by the designer based on experience and the intended slab use. A minimum 4 inch layer of free -draining gravel should be placed beneath basement level slabs to facilitate drainage. This material should consist of minus 2 inch aggregate with at least 50% retained on the No. 4 sieve and less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve. All fill materials for support of floor slabs should be compacted to at least 95 % of maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Required fill can consist of the on-site gravels devoid of vegetation, topsoil and oversized rock. SURFACE DRAINAGE The following drainage precautions should be observed during construction and maintained at all times after the residence has been completed: 1) The floor level should have adequate elevation to protect the building from potential flooding. 2) Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and compacted to at least 95 % of the maximum standard Proctor density in pavement and slab areas and to at least 90 % of the maximum standard Proctor density in landscape areas. 3) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions. We recommend a minimum slope of 6 inches in the first 10 feet in unpaved areas and a minimum slope of 3 inches in the first 10 feet in paved areas. 4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill. LIMITATIONS This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no warranty either expressed or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the exploratory borings drilled at H -P GEOTECH 6 the locations indicated on Fig. 1, the proposed type of construction and our experience in the area. Our fmdings include interpolation and extrapolation of the subsurface conditions identified at the exploratory borings and variations in the subsurface conditions may not become evident until excavation is performed. If conditions encountered during construction appear different from those described in this report, we should be notified so that re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes. We are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. As the project evolves, we should provide continued consultation and field services during construction to review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations, and to verify that the recommendations have been appropriately interpreted. Significant design changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommendations presented herein. We recommend on-site observation of excavations and foundation bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a representative of the geotechnical engineer. Sincerely, HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEO _ L, INC. Jordy Z. Adamson Reviewed by: Steven L. Pawlak, P.E. JZA/ksw H -P GEOTECH APPROXIMATE SCALE 1" = 60' 1 BUILDING ENVELOPE 1,7 1 1 1 LOT 3 1 1 ^ • BORING 2 1 LOT 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 BORING 6 BORING 1 0 L • J ^ ^ r - ^ r � r LEGEND AD ` '� ^..... ^ RO • BORING DRILLED FOR CURRENT STUDY ^ �• O BORING DRILLED FOR PRELIMINARY STUDY, 8/4/98 100 880 HEPWORTH -- PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. BLUE CREEK LOT 1 ^ .••••• MEN. r LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS l Fig. 1 0 5 10 BORING 1 BORING 2 50/6 WC=2.9 -200=13 26/12 WC=2.5 +4=46 -200=9 0 5 10 15 15 20 20 ....�� 25 25 Note: Explanation of symbols is shown on Fig. 3. 100 880 HEPWORTH -- PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS Fig. 2 INN LEGEND: ElTOPSOIL; sandy silty clay, organic, firm, moist, dark brown. GRAVEL (GP -GM); sandy, slightly silty, with cobbles and boulders, dense to very dense, slightly moist to wet below groundwater encountered, brown, subrounded to rounded rock. Drive sample; standard penetration test (SPT), 1 3/8 inch I.D. split spoon sample, ASTM D - 1586. Drive sample blow count; indicates that 26 blows of a 140 pound hammer 26/12 falling 30 inches were required to drive the SPT sampler 12 inches. T Free water level measured during drilling. Practical drilling refusal. ---�► Depth at which boring caved following drilling. NOTES: 1. Exploratory borings were drilled on November 6, 2000 with a 4 -inch diameter continuous flight power auger. 2. Locations of exploratory borings were measured approximately by pacing from features shown on the site plan provided. 3. Elevations of exploratory borings were not measured and the log of exploratory borings are drawn to depth. 4. The exploratory boring locations should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. 5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory boring logs represent the approximate boundaries between material types and transitions may be gradual. 6. Water level readings shown on the logs were made at the time of drilling conditions indicated. Fluctuation in water level may occur with time. 7. Laboratory Testing Results: WC = Water Content ( % ) +4 = Percent retained on No. 4 sieve. -200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve. 100 880 HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. LEGEND AND NOTES Fig. 3 • P4 W r HYDROMETER ANALYSIS STEVE ANALYSIS TIME READINGS U.S. STANDARD SERIES 1 CLEAR SQUARE OPENINGS 24 HR. 7 HR 04B MIN.15 MIN.60MIN19MIN.4 MIN.1 HIV. /200 *100 *5O 430 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Mw -a arra faMMOMMOMM mama Maar AMA. a- a— www www. r—mow MM unnrMr �� aM —M.a. M - NOMI .M- aa— —r E MMM M.arwa ww M..m aaM aawa Mar rwrwaa- IMIIMPIai MN. MMm. Maga Mw aaa-a.M..M IMIMMIMM raMaM as-- Maa -a arra amid amm .........M+ am. Mara./ laININ Mal MlinlaM MIIIIMM-aa-- aNIIIIINaN r - ran MN.N. a—ala-mw war maw a- MIM. .arra - -.M ^a-Masa--amm.m.a- -wI.ra. - Mara w am wr•.�r1Mr- w- ra SIM ra-a Mi r— M.r...Ma.— r- ^ a M. .maw rm- r-rr SIMM rami r saw r- AaMaaa - m /..Ira IIMINM M as aw ww^ arra NI Ma. ama- - -M m -Mas war. - aMOM NNIaa M a — r —.al—Oran iwwaM r -a- - MMON MOM Mer A MP =Ma IMI III AmmMa• AM mmra IA mar MINIUM MIMPII• MP M MM.= MM.. am 0.mM IMMra Mal MI a-a-.r...WM. Mrs. MOM= MN MO Aa- MM. aMall aa..Mwr - MMM - a MEM ...Ma .arra Mar a.11a — a— r --NM. ...Ma Mara. r MMM NII. MINIM Mai r- aw raa—a - -.w� draw IMINM 416 48 44 3/8' 3/4" 1 1/2' 3" 5'6' 8. 100 Mar aaM -a -a - a maa..a...rr i SBM M www a NM= ■-r.MMall M— Marwa.-M-MMN= Ma aaa MIE•aa MN= MI Mar Sam a aaai =IMO !Mal �.aMINIM 11•11 a=1•1 MaNI —a— ....MEN ----.w.- as ram .imam -r - asM m NarawMira r— ��...a.mMwaMMani MEON !Malaga laIM • ME= MMal rr Mara wr MEIN wMEM Mia — rwwrMal M- M Ma 1 -A wl-- w - a MM •.r.Ia.r r-- a— aw a raw. me - MOM Mara Ma. rMall Mam 4aaar-.-a- M r a MM.. a-- IN M+wr NM Er MMI =MEM Mia.-a NM aMaa M —ilara wmaama r— r— a— a Mae a— ...a.MMEM a mar Madam a- - a FM NMOMO raw--rall =Man -- .MNIM MaN • -r- -w ....anal M.Mrra r— _-_ Mme. r..iwR Mala -aIM Mal MOM! MEM= MEER NI MM. — Mama .N.mr aWaal. MOM= laAm. marMaa..MaM-rMal a _ M wr-r•rwrrwMEM r— Ma. dila. aMMw a- Nam — F Nelan ill= MEM MI NM =MOM a MINIM 1a.ar...rd Marra rr--a - r -r aaa.mr Mani da-MIIMMEMMIM -- aamaa .mwraa mama.. MOMMIM a -tea IIIIMMUMMIMMM r. -Mamma r.Ma raaww araMMW aaaaa Mar madam --a Mar Awa -. MEM. Mall M - Mai a a.d IMI. -.m Mar arra -ram Mamma _al Ma-r-ra-M-a—a—lr ... ENA M. amMew MM=Mar alma -a - rte. Ma....... MINIM. M IMM -a a— - r - - 11.M.M MIM MarM- ir.mM M-ra.M — 'waw ^awe Mara. lir MBE a=MI a-MINNI_ - ... NM r.Ma. M -Marro arraMOM.m.-IN a— Ira � a mum —ar wr amww — aa. err. r -r - r - arrr aa'_ Mara -Ira MM -r--. wr...a•r.rraa-r- - mm madam mw ala ram am -.r- - . �....A. w a— aaa 1 Mal Ma—MaaM aa- a .a .arra -a- M a..Ma MIME. MEM IN M a...m . mar _ a --a -A/ Ma a- Maar arca IN NM= Malan MI Mara MINIM rawar aM A rr.-a.-�r•1 aa Mal aIIIMMM .a.. r—... ..aa• 'MIME a -Mamas—m as—M .ma 4 M_1° a.m. maa. Mniala mama m AMO Ms NM — war=Man a --MM. waw a— NIII -- ^NINI - __ Ma ala -a— a -aa -a - MAMA w- - .001 .002 .005 .009 .019 .037 .074 .150 -a arm- rM.MIAMI AMI -- _ —aAMEM MMMONAIA NI MEM m am.. allMm ow mad - 90 80 70 .300 .600 1.18 2.36 4.75 9.2.s19.0 37.5 76.2 152 203 127 DIAMETER OF PARTICLES IN MILLIMETERS CLAY TO SILT FINE SAND 1 CR�VEL 1 MEDIUM 'COARSE FINE, COARSE COBBLES GRAVEL 46 % LIQUID LIMIT SAND 45 % SAMPLE OF: Slightly Silty Sand and Gravel SILT AND CLAY 9 % PLASTICITY INDEX FROM: Baring 2 at 2 feet 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 100 880 HEPWORTH--PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. GRADATION TEST RESULTS Fig. 4 I • rO co co O O O z w O Li z J J uJ CC I— ° w w �— O >- W 0 C7 w 1- Q cc ,Qm a L o CC CC a 2 S011_ OR BEDROCK TYPE Silty Sandy Gravel Slightly Silty Sand and Gravel UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (PSFI ATTERBERG LIMITS x o a 5 ii O N �G d z Z 0 F 0 y in M Ctco NATURAL DRY DENSITY {PcD N L[) N SAMPLE LOCATION BORING DEPTH (feet) Lt) N N w/Ilotd 41/,67 4 4 -17-e272-)6) .. e2 t r SL�22�E%a7%(`.c I� 1 a a. r/ 11 t..!. _..._ i 91 y 67.0 ASE iXe, 1e0 1 w. 4 —4 tI TYi? WfilDaei 60-7 1 3. 4 4 ., 4 1 40l 1 4 t ie 17 3� 1 yv !) fs el c t -_ L' m 1 eAsE Fixeio ar5EAL-Lifrr ES f �C'f L�x76e/o2 aD 3 °xg° 30x80 55xg° °x i(4) 3 4,(6' f� x Goxso "JA /1-2 N,,2-0 4 e, 6e- Oce )/ / r J rJ 1 / ! r r1 t fr Lc7 2 //y/1/ rf� Z-7(7-/ae c,e2 •- t.0 G// C- 0 / -- /6 x ` (-��,ea6F o ),e 6 2 - 3 °)( g69 /c -u ,4 Cis,E'-e.---4.-1- C c,4 L) 16 ' 30xgo/, 1 I / 1 �, ! - 'Lf•� f/C/ / l l 1 i /X�fJX r 4 06" 3540 67 - 6C'/V. - °X8' "'JA,T1 ,Q il/00, c3 /' i 1 / i < < /� rIr l t GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING 970-945-8212 MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS for SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING CONSTRUCTION including NEW CONSTRUCTION ADDITIONS ALTERATIONS and MOVED BUILDINGS In order to understand the scope of the work intended under a permit application and expedite the issuance of a permit it is important that complete information be provided. Adequate and complete information will prevent delays in the plan review process. Reviewing a plan and the discovery that required information has not been provided by the applicant may result in the delay of the permit issuance and in proceeding with building construction. The owner or contractor may be required to provide this information before the plan review may proceed. This causes delays because other plans that are in line lot review may be given attention before the new information may be reviewed after it has been provided to the Building Department. Please review this document to determine if you have enough information to design your project and provide adequate information to facilitate a plan review. If you do not, it may be helpful to obtain a book titled "Dwelling Construction under the Uniform Building Code". This book is available to you through this department at our cost. Also, please consider using a design professional for assistance in your design and a construction professional for construction of your project. To provide for a more understandable plan in order to determine compliance with the building, plumbing and mechanical codes, applicants are requested to review the following checklist prior to and during design. Applicants are required to indicate appropriately and to submit the completed checklist at time of application for a permit. 1 January 1, 1999 Plans to be included for a Building Permit, must be on drafting paper at least 18"x24" and drawn to scale. Plans must include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations all sides with decks, balcony, steps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the finish grade line. A section showing in detail, from the bottom of the footing to the top of the roof, including re -bar, anchor bolts, pressure treated plates, floor joists, wall studs and spacing, insulation, sheating, house - rap, (which is required), siding or any approved building material. A window schedule. A door schedule. A floor framing plan, a roof framing plan, roof must be designed to withstand a 40# per ft. up to 7,000 F.O.S. and an 80 M.P.H. wind. All sheets to be identified by number and indexed. All of the above requirements must be met or your plans will be returned. 1. Is a site plan included that indicates the distances of the proposed building or addition to property lines, other buildings, setback easements and utility easements? Yes ?O 2. Does the site plan include the location of the I. S.D.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System) and the distances to property lines, wells (on subject property and adjacent properties), streams pr water courses? Yes 3. Does the site plan indicate the location and direction of the County or private road accessing the property? Yes 4. Do. the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all reinforcing steel in accordance with the uniform building code or per stamped engineered design? �� Yes 5. Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl spaces and the clearances required between wood and earth? Yes 2 6. Do the plans indicate the size and location of ventilation openings for the attic, roofjoist spaces's and soffits? Yes 7. Do the plans include design loads as required by Garfield County for roof snow loads, (a minimum of 40 pounds per square foot up to & including 7,000 feet above sea level), floor loads and wind loads? Yes JC? 8. Does the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor and roof construction? Yes, 9. Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists, wall studs, ceiling joists, roof rafters or joists or trusses? Yes 10. Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method ofpositive connection of all columns and beams? Yes 11. Does the plan indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the highest point of the building or addition measured at mid span between the ridge and the eave down to existing grade contours? Yes 12. Does the plan include any stove or zero clearance fireplace planned for installation including make and model and Colorado Phase II certifications or phase II EPA certification? Yes 7(- No 13. Does the plan include a masonry fireplace including a fireplace section indicating design to comply with the Uniform Building Code Chapter 37? Yes No 14. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that egress/rescue windows from sleeping rooms and/or basements comply with the requirements of the Uniform Building Code? Yes No 15. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that windows provide natural light and ventilation for all habitable rooms? Yes Xl No 3 16. Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass doors, glazing immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as a walking surface; sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub enclosures and specify safety glazing for these areas? Yes /0 No 17. Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces, boilers and water heaters indicated on the plan? Yes No 18. Do you understand that if you are building on a parcel of land created by the exemption process or the subdivision process, are building plans in compliance with all plat notes and/or covenants? Yes /u No 19. Do you understand that if you belong to a homeowners association, it is your responsibility to obtain written permission from the association, if required by that association, prior to submitting an application for a building permit? If you do not have written permission from the association, do you understand that the plan check fee will not be refunded should the architectural committee deny or reject your building plans? Yes No 20. Will this be the only residential structure on the parcel? Yes x No If no -Explain: 21. Have two (2) complete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the application? Yes 22. Do you understand that the minimum size a home can be on a lot is a 20ft. x 20ft.? Yes No 23. Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other construction code requirements? Yes jJ No 24. Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a final inspection by the Garfield County Building Department? Yes No 25. Do you understand that approval for design and/or construction changes are required prior to the application of these changes? Yes X No 4 di 26. Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a "Plan Review" fee from you at the time of application and that you will be required to pay the "Permit Fee" as well as any "School Impact" or "Septic System" fees required, at the time you pick up your building permit? Yes No 27. Are you aware that twenty-four (24) hour notice is required for all inspections? Inspections will be made from Battlement Mesa to West Glenwood in the mornings and from Glenwood Springs to Carbondale in the afternoon. Morning inspections must be called in by 12:00 p.m. the day before; afternoon inspections must be called in by 4:00 p.m. the day before. Failure to give twenty-four (24) hour notice for inspections will delay your inspection one (1) day. Inspections are to be called in to 384-5003. Yes No 28. Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the Uniform Building Code including approval on a final inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy and occupancy of the building? Yes No 29. Are you aware that the person signing the Permit Application, whether the "Owner", "Agent of the Owner", "General Contractor", "Contractor" or otherwise, is the party responsible for the project complying with the Uniform Building Code? Yes , No 30. Are you aware that prior to issuance of a building permit you are required to show proof of a driveway access permit or obtain a statement from the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department stating one is not necessary? You can contact the Road & Bridge Department at 625-8601. Yes No 31. Do you understand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed Electrician and Plumber to perform installations and hookups, unless you as the homeowner are performing the work? The license number of the person performing the work will be required at time of applicable inspection. Yes No 32. Are you aware, that on the front of the Building Permit Application you will need to fill in the Parcel/Schedule Number for the lot you are applying for this permit on prior to issuance of a building permit? Your attention in this is appreciated. Yes No 5 I hereby acknowledge that I have read, understand and answered these questions to the b o my4bility. signatur date Phone: 9 Z7' 3l (days); 46 3 j 70S (evenings) Project Name: Project Address: D Notes: If you have answered "No" on any of the questions, you may be required to provide this information at the request of the Building Official prior to beginning the plan review process. Delays in issuing the permit are to be expected. Work may not proceed without the issuance of a permit. If it is determined by the Building Official that additional information is necessary to review the application and plans to determine minimum compliance with the adopted codes, the application may be placed behind more recent applications for building permits in the review process and not reviewed until required information has been provided and the application rotates again to first position for review, delay in issuance of the permit or delay in proceeding with construction. bpminreq 8/00 6 szt,z cktg z 4'73— o • V a vs Et2 co • 8511 3 ts. c a 3 ,o -'611111 rt Q O E E� 00 1a" h � o • 0.0 3 5 a� z z County Road (Note the Road Number and Name) N 1994 Building Cede Setbacks: 25 feet front and rear and 10 feet on the sides Snowload: 401bs. /sq. ft. up to 7000 feet Seismic: Zone 1 Windshear: 80 mph Wind exposure: B Windload: 151bs. /sq. ft. Frost Depth: 36 inches -30 inches from finished grade to top of footing (Liveload is snowload-imposed by snow) GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING and PLANNING NOTICE OF CLARIFICATION FIRE PROTECTION: It is the interpretation of this department that the provision of UBC Section 302.4, Exception Number 3, also applies to openings for access to attic space above a U occupancy. The access door in the ceiling of a garage must be self closing, tight fitting, solid wood door, 1-3/8ths inches thick, or have a 20 minute fire protection rating or the one hour fire separation wall between the garage and the dwelling must extend above the ceiling, all the way to the roof. ENERGY CONSERVATION Garfield County is enforcing Resolution 96-05 (Chap. 13 Energy Conservation). ➢ 2" x 4" Exterior walls must be supplemented (i.e. Rigid insulation with taped or sealed joints or other approved ways to comply with minimum county insulation requirements: R-19 — Walls; R-29 — Roofs; 1* R-11 — Floors over unheated areas 1* Exception: Insulate foundation to frost line and install vapor barrier on ground surface. BEST copY February 27, 2001 Horizon Construction Garfield County Re: Niro Building permit Lot 2 St. Finnbar Subdivision Building & Planning Department Prior to Performing and Issuance: of a Certificate of Occupancy for this residence, HP Geotech must provide Garfield County with a Yaitten__statmkent of.certification .(stamped) verifying that the house and garage were built in accordance to the recommendations submitted within the engineers report submitted with the building application. Thank ou, Arno Ehlers Chief Building Official 109 8th Street, Suite 303 RFs. i0- o� JUL-12-2002 09:48 HP GEOTECH Gtech March 15, 2001 ifepworth-I'awihli Geotechuie d Int. 5020 County Hand 154 Glenwood Springs, Coloredo 8.1601 Phone: 970-945.788 Fax 970-945.8454 tipgeoi bpgeotec h.tont P. 02{03 Horizon Construction Attn: Butch Zigures 222 Renee Lane Carbondale, Colorado 81623 Job No. 100 880 Subject: Observation of Excavation, Proposed Residence, Lot 2, St. Finnbar Farm Subdivision, Garfield County, Colorado Dear Mr. Zigures: As requested, a representative of Hepworth-Pawlak Geoteehn lcal, Inc. observed the excavation at the subject site on March 12, 2001 to evaluate the soils exposed for foundation support. The findings of our work and recommendations for the foundation design are presented in this report. We previously conducted a subsoil study for design of foundations at the site and presented our findings in a report dated November 14, 2000, lob No. 100 880. The proposed residence will be a two story wood frame structure with an attached garage. Ground floors will be slab •,:-.'r • - Spread footings were designed for an allowable soil bearing pres of 4,000 psf. ri>ti,Gd kYsk�IIV►�-�� At the time of our visit to the site, the foundation excavation had been cut in one level up to 11/2 feet below the adjacent gxviwd surface. The excavation had been cut through the topsoil and based in relatively dense, slightly silty sandy gravel with cobbles. No free water was encountered in the excavation and the soils were slightly moist. Silty sand was exposed in a small area in the western portion of the excavation. A test pit dug outside the northwest corner of the footing area revealed up to 1 foot of this material overlying the natural dense river alluvium. We recommended extending the Rooting bearing elevation down to the dense gravel soils. The dense gravel soil conditions exposed in the excavation are consistent with those previously encountered on the site and suitable for support of spread footings designed for the recommended allowable bearing pressure of 4,000 psf. Loose disturbed soils should be removed and compacted in the footing areas. The subgrade should be protected from freezing and concrete should. not be placed on frozen ground. Other recommendations presented in our previous report which are applicable should also be observed. JUL-12-2002 09:49 H -P GEOTECH P.03/03 Horizon Construction March 15, 2001 Page 2 The recommendations submitted in this letter are based on our observation of the soils exposed within the foundation excavation and the previous limited subsurface exploration at the site. Variations i the subsurface conditions below the excavation could increase the risk of foundation movement. We should be advised of any variations encountered in the excava ion conditions for possible changes to recommendations contained in this letter_ If there are any questions or if we may be of further assistance, please let us know, Sincerely, HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. Trevor L. Knell Rev. by: SLP TLK/ksw H -P GEOTECH TOTAL P.03 ['"SPECTION WILL NOT BE MADE UNLESS THIS CARD IS POSTED ON THE JOB 24 HOURS NOTICE REQUIRED FOR INSPECTIONS 24 HOURS NOTICE REQUIRED FOR INSPECTIONS BUILDING PERMIT GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO Datepstted. 1 2oi[ed Area Permit No 1 AGREEMENT In consideration of the issuance of this permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with all laws and regulations related to the zoning, location; construction and erection of the proposed structure for which this permit is granted, and further agrees that if the above said regulations are not fully complied with in the zoning, location, erection. and construction of the above described structure, the permit may then be revoked by notice from the County Building Inspector a d IMMEDIATELY BECOME NULL AND VOID. Use Fo AG Address or Legal Des ion Owner J Setbacks - Front Side Side Rear This Card Must BePostedSo It is Plainly Visible From The Street Until Final Inspection. $PECTION RECORD Footing 2: -oC e, i Cf,,_. Foundation "3 '(V.-9( ilFIIIIMIIIIMIIIIIIIIIII Underground Plumbing of t Insulation 1�..7.pt 1 a `M1 , .ugh Plumbing s z_ etl . Drywall's+NQ Awlji.of A_S . i, himney &-Vent, i i- o- c i , ' , �t► Eleetrie Final (by State Inspector) HMV Gas Piping A. tial Final Electric Rough (By State Inspector) i /5 ' Septic Final • Framing ; -o •a ( , - ' 751l (To include Rodin place and Windows and Doors installed). >• otes • ALL LISTED ITEMS MUST BE INSPECTED WHETHER INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR, AND APPROVED BEFORE COVERING - UNDERGROUND OR ABOVE GROUND. THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE Phone 384-5003 109 Soh Street County Courthouse Glenwood Springs, Colorado. APPROVED D° NOT DESTROY THIS CARD Dat LBY) IF PLACED OUTSIDE - COVER WITII CLEAR PLASTIC'