HomeMy WebLinkAbout1.30 Natural Habitat Statement 8-5-10NATURAL HABITAT STATEMENT
LAFARGE WEST, INC. - CERISE MINE
LLAFARG E
Garfield County, CO
Garfield County Unified Land Use Resolution
Article IV
Section 4-502 Description of Submittal Requirements
D. Land Suitability Analyses -11. Natural Habitat
E. Impact Analysis - 8. Environmental Effects - c. Environmental Resources
Prepared by:
Buys & Associates, Inc.
300 E. Mineral Ave., Suite 10
Littleton, CO 80122
303-781-8211
www.buysandassociates.com
August 5, 2010
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Lafarge, West Inc. (Lafarge) is proposing to mine gravel on the southern 65.5 acres (Permit Area) of
a 97.8 -acre parcel owned by Clifford Cerise Ranch CO, LLP (Cerise Parcel) and located at the
northeast corner of Highway 82 and Crystal Springs Road. The new mine site is zoned rural and is
used for agriculture. Lafarge's Powers pit is to the west of the proposed new mine. Mining at the
existing site will be completed prior to the start of mining operations at the Cerise Mine site. The
Cerise Mine is planned to operate for 15 years and will be developed in eight sequences.
The purpose of the Natural Habitat Statement is to identify existing ecological conditions on the
Cerise Parcel and to address the how activities associated within the Cerise Mine will affect these
resources. Specifically, the Natural Habitat Statement will demonstrate how Lafarge will comply
with the Garfield County Land Use Change Permit Application Sections 4-501 (F) Part 3.d (Site Plan
- Significant On-site Features - Wetlands, Wildlife, and Vegetative Cover), Section 4-502 (D) Part 11
(Land Suitability Analysis - Natural Habitat), and Section 4-502 (E) Part 8.a and 8.c (Environmental
Effects - Flora and Fauna and Environmental Resources).
2.0 Section 4-501 (F): Major Impact Review Submittal Materials
Part 3.d: Site Plan - Significant On-site Features
Wetlands, Wildlife, and Vegetative Cover
Buys and Associates, Inc. (B&A) was retained to assess the current ecological conditions at the
Cerise Parcel in Garfield County east of Carbondale, Colorado. Ecological habitat assessments were
conducted by B&A biologists on June 7, 2010. The Cerise Parcel is located on approximately 97.8
acres within Section 25 and 26 of Township 7 South, Range 88 West (Figure 1). At the time of the
survey, the majority of the Cerise Parcel was being used for hay production (i.e, alfalfa and orchard
grass) (Figure 2). A narrow stretch of pinon pine and juniper was located along the western
portion of the Cerise Parcel as well as in the southwest corner. Dry hill slopes with a canopy cover
of grasses and sagebrush were located below the existing County Road 103 northwest of the
property, and above the existing Highway 82 south of the property. The southern edge of the Cerise
Parcel is directly adjacent to Highway 82 and Crystal Springs Creek meanders through western
edge and empties into the Roaring Fork River just south of Highway 82. The creek is surrounded by
a riparian corridor, which consists of a mature and young cottonwood canopy. Figure 3 displays
photo point locations throughout the Cerise Parcel with the corresponding photos located in
Appendix A.
2.1 Wetlands
The Corps of Engineers uses three indicators when making wetland determinations: vegetation,
soil, and hydrology. To be considered a wetland, all three indicators must be present. In order to
provide a conservative estimation of the distribution and abundance of wetlands on the Cerise
Parcel, a preliminary jurisdictional delineation (PJD) was performed on June 7, 2010 based on the
presence/absence of wetland vegetation. To aid in this PJD, soil data was also examined to
document the presence/absence of hydric soils. This approach allows wetland boundaries to be
generally defined so that avoidance measures can be implemented during the planning process.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA-NRCS) has
assigned hydric ratings to soil units in the Garfield County (USDA-NRCS 2008). Based on the USDA-
NRCS data, the soil within the Cerise Parcel, including along Crystal Springs Creek, has a rating of
Not Hydric. Soils with a Partially Hydric rating occur south of Highway 82, outside the Cerise
Parcel.
Although wetland species were documented in various areas throughout the property (i.e., Crystal
Springs Creek, irrigation ditches, and ponding area), only Crystal Springs Creek exhibited a
prevalence/dominance of wetland species (see ACE Arid West Region - Dominance Test and
Prevalence Worksheet). Wetlands along Crystal Springs Creek exhibited the characteristics of
fringed wetlands where wetland species border the creek edges spanning an average of about 10
feet from the centerline of the creek.
The irrigation ditches, tail -water gathering drainages, and the water ponding area in the eastern
portion of the Cerise Parcel, were not dominated by wetland species. Although cottonwoods and
creeping buttercup were documented in these areas, non -wetland species including upland pasture
grasses, dandelion, and narroleaf plantain dominated the area.
2.2 Wildlife
As the majority of the Cerise Parcel has previously undergone disturbance from agricultural
activities, habitats exhibit little vegetative diversity, few native species and overall, little
resemblance to their optimal state. Native vegetation communities have been significantly
diminished and seeded rangeland species and weeds have become the dominant species.
Cultivated fields do provide potential habitat for a variety of wildlife species such as elk (Cervus
elaphus), mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus), red fox (Vulpes vulpes), coyotes (Canis latrans), skunk
(Mephitis mephitis), and a variety of songbirds and small mammals. All of these species are
common along the Roaring Fork Valley.
Small portions of the Cerise Parcel fall within the pinon pine -juniper habitat type (Mutel and
Emerick 1992). According to Mutel and Emerick (1992), the pinon pine and juniper areas in
Colorado provide habitat for the following common mammals: badger (Taxidea taxus), bobcat (Felis
rufus), Colorado chipmunk (Tamias quadrivittatus), coyote (Canis latrans), mule deer (Odocoileus
hemionu), elk (Cervus elaphus), gray fox (Urocyon cinereoargenteus), black -tailed jackrabbit (Lepus
californicus), mountain lion (Felis concolor), canyon mouse (Peromyscus crinitus), porcupine
(Erethizon dorsatum), ringtail (Bassariscus astutus), stripped skunk (Mephitis mephitis), rock
squirrel (Spermophilus variegatus), bushy -tailed woodrat (Neotoma cinerea), and Mexican woodrat
(Neotoma mexicana).
A large variety of migratory birds utilize these habitats, they include: mountain bluebird (Sialia
currucoides), bushtit (Psaltriparus minimus), mountain chickadee (Parus gambeli), mourning dove
(Zenaida macroura), golden eagle (Aquila chrysaetos), prairie falcon (Falco mexicanus), blue -gray
gnatcatcher (Polioptila caerulea), red-tailed hawk (Buteo jamaicensis), pinon jay (Gymnorhinus
cyanochephalus), Steller's jay (Cyanocitta stelleri), America kestrel (Falco sparverius), black -billed
magpie (Pica pica), great horned owl (Bubo viginianus), common poorwill (Phalaenoptilus nuttallii),
chipping sparrow (Spizella passerina), lark (Chondestes grammacus), plain titmouse (Parus
inornatus), canyon towhee (Pipilo fuscus), and wild turkey (Meleagrisgallopavo).
Reptiles and amphibians that utilize these habitats include: collard lizard (Crotaphytus collaris),
eastern fence lizard (Sceloporus undulatus), northern side -blotched lizard (uta stansburiana),
northern tree lizard (urosaurus ornatus), sagebrush lizard (Sceloporus graciosus), short -horned
lizard (Phrynosoma douglassii), and western rattlesnake (Crotalus viridis).
A general wildlife survey of the Cerise Parcel was conducted on June 7, 2009. This survey included
a raptor nest inventory of all potential nesting habitat within 1/2 mile of the Cerise Parcel. No raptor
nests were observed during the survey; however, access to the south of Highway 82 was limited
due to private land. A strip of cottonwood tress is present between the Roaring Fork River and
Highway 82, this area was glassed using binoculars but no nests were observed. According to the
CDOW, an inactive bald eagle nest has been identified along the Roaring Fork River; however, it is
greater than 1/z mile from the Cerise Parcel. Table 1 provides the wildlife species observed during
the survey.
Table 1. Wildlife Species Observed During the Survey (June 7, 2010
Common Name
Scientific Name
Status
Birds
American Robin
Turdus migratorius
Not listed
Black -billed Magpie
Pica pica
Not listed
Dark -eyed Junco
Junco hyemalis
Not listed
European Starling
Sturnus vulgaris
CDOW Other Game
Mallard
Anas platyrhynchos
Not listed
Northern Flicker
Colaptes auratus
Not listed
Red-tailed Hawk
Buteo jamaicensis
Not listed
Red -winged Blackbird
Agelaius phoeniceus
Not listed
Common Raven
Corvus corax
Not listed
Western Meadowlark
Sturnella neglecta
Not listed
Mammals
Yellow -bellied Marmot
Marmotafaviventris
CDOW Small Game Mammal
Reptiles
Common Garter Snake
Thamnophis sirtalis
Not listed
Presence and Estimated Population of Special Status Wildlife Species
Based upon existing habitats on the Cerise Parcel, four Federally or State -listed species have the
potential to occur in the area, bald eagle, whooping crane, Townsend's big -eared bat, and midget
faded rattlesnake; plus one BLM species of special concern, Barrow's goldeneye. Although potential
habitats for these species may exist, these species have a low probability of occurrence.
The bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) was federally de -listed on July 9, 2007. Their
populations will continue to be closely monitored and managed by the Colorado Division of Wildlife
as a State threatened species. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service will also monitor their populations
under their authority through the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act and Migratory Bird Treaty
Act. According to CDOW, the Roaring Fork River corridor is mapped as bald eagle foraging area and
bald eagles have been observed in the area. The Colorado Natural Heritage Program (CNHP) has
accounts of bald eagle in the general area of Section 26 of T7S, R98W, and the CDOW has confirmed
identification of an inactive nest along the Roaring Fork River. This location was determined to be
greater than 1/2 -mile from the Cerise Parcel, and no bald eagles were observed in or adjacent to the
area during the June survey.
The whooping crane (Grus americana), a federal and State endangered species, is a rare migrant to
western valleys. Most records of sightings have occurred in Delta, Mesa, and Gunnison counties.
There is a low potential for the species to occur on the Cerise Parcel.
The Barrow's goldeneye (Bucephala islandica) is a BLM species of special concern. According to
the report generated by the CNHP, Barrow's goldeneye was observed in Section 33, Township 7
South, Range 87, on December 16, 2000. This section is along the Roaring Fork River and is
approximately 3 miles from the Cerise Parcel. Habitat for this species is not present on the Cerise
Parcel and there is low potential for its occurrence.
The Townsend's big eared bat (Plecotus townsendii) is a State endangered species. The bat is a
western species occupying semidesert shrublands, pinon-juniper woodlands, and open montane
forests. One sub -species, Plecotus townsendii pallescens, occurs over most of the western two-thirds
of the state and extreme southeastern Colorado to elevations of about 9,500 ft. Although roosting
habitat is limited the Cerise Parcel does support potential foraging habitats. There is a low
potential for the species to occur in the area.
The midget -faded rattlesnake (Crotalus viridis concolor) is a State Endangered species. The snake
inhabits grassland and shrublands throughout western Colorado. Agriculture areas within the
Cerise Parcel may provide habitat for the species, however agricultural activities have likely
deterred routine use. There is a low potential for the species to occur on the Cerise Parcel.
2.3 Vegetation Cover
At the time of the survey, the majority of the Cerise Parcel consisted of alfalfa and pasture grass
(mainly orchard grass) that was being harvested for hay production (Figure 2). Several irrigation
ditches crossed the property and were being used to bring irrigation water to the existing fields.
Houses and other residential structures were located on the northern portion of the property. Dry
hill slopes with a canopy cover of grasses and sagebrush were located below the existing County
Road 103 northwest of the property, and above the existing Highway 82 south of the property.
Crystal Springs Creek bordered the northwest side of the property. Cottonwood trees were located
in several locations on the property, but were primarily noted in close association with Crystal
Springs Creek. Wetland areas were only present only in close association with Crystal Springs
Creek and were consistent with "fringed wetlands" where wetland vegetation only occurs
immediately adjacent to the stream channel (i.e., approximately 10 feet from stream centerline). A
small area of water ponding is located on the east side of the property, and is supplied by irrigation
tail -water. This ponding area did not qualify as a wetland. Vegetation data was collected in the
Project Area. Table 2 list the vegetation species observed during the survey (June 7, 2010).
Table 2. Vegetation Species Observed During the Survey (June 7, 2010).
Family
Scientific Name
Common Name
Weed)
(Y/N)
Anacardiaceae
Rhus trilobata
Skunkbush sumac
Apiaceae
Heracleum maximum
Common parsnip
Asclepiadaceae
Asclepias sp.
Milkweed
Asparagaceae
Asparagus officinalis
Asparagus
Asteraceae
Artemisia frigida
Prairie sagewort
Asteraceae
Artemisia tridentata
Sagebrush
Asteraceae
Chrysothamnus nauseosus
Rabbitbrush
Asteraceae
Cirsium arvense
Canada thistle
yes
Asteraceae
Taraxacum officinale
Dandelion
Asteraceae
Tragopogon dubius
Yellow salsify
Family
Scientific Name
Common Name
Weed'
(Y/N)
Boraginaceae
Cynoglossum officinale
Houndstongue
yes
Brassicaceae
Capsella bursa -pastoris
Shepherds purse
Brassicaceae
Cardaria draba
White Top
yes
Brassicaceae
Sisymbrium altissimum
Jimhill mustard
Caprifoliaceae
Symphoricarpos occidentalis
Western snowberry
Chenopodiaceae
Chenopodium album
Lambsquarter
Chenopodiaceae
Kochia scoparia
Kochia
yes
Chenopodiaceae
Salsola iberica
Russian thistle
yes
Convolvulaceae
Convolvulus arvensis
Bindweed
yes
Fabaceae
Medicago sativa
Alfalfa
Fabaceae
Melilotus officinalis
Yellow sweetclover
Fabaceae
Trifolium sp.
Clover
Gymnosperm
Junipersu sp.
Juniper
Juncaceae
Juncus sp.
Rush
Pinaceae
Pinus edulis
Pinyon pine
Plantaginaceae
Plantago lanceolata
Narrowleaf plantain
Poaceae
Agropyron smithii
Western wheatgrass
Poaceae
Bromus inermis
Smooth brome
yes
Poaceae
Bromus tectorum
Cheatgrass
yes
Poaceae
Dactylisglomerata
Orchard grass
Poaceae
Poa sp.
Poa grass
Polygonaceae
Rheum rhabarbarum
Rhubarb
Polygonaceae
Rumex crispus
Culry dock
Ranunculaceae
Clematis ligusticifolia
Western white clematis
Ranunculaceae
Ranunculus repens
Creeping buttercup
Rosaceae
Prunus virginiana
Chokecherry
Rosaceae
Rosa arkansana
Rose
Salicaceae
Populus angustifolia
Narrowleaf cottonwood
Salicaceae
Populus fremontii
Fremont cottonwood
Salicaceae
Salix exigua
Coyote willow
1Source (CDOA 2010).
Presence and Estimated Population of Special Status Plant Species
On May 28, 2010, a data request was submitted to the Colorado Natural Heritage Program (CNHP)
regarding any special status species (i.e., Federally -listed, State -listed, and agency species of
concern), that have the potential to occur within five miles of the Cerise Parcel. This request
resulted in the identification of occurrences of four species: Ute ladies -tresses, American yellow
lady's-slipper, canyon bog orchid, and Harrington beardtongue.
Although the CNHP data search identified the occurrence of four special status species within 5
miles of the Cerise Parcel, no suitable habitat for the American yellow lady's slipper, canyon bog
orchid, and Harrington beardtongue occurs in the Cerise Parcel.
Potential habitat for the Ute ladies -tresses is present along the riparian corridor of Crystal Springs
Creek. This habitat was examined for the presence of Ute ladies -tresses on June 7, 2010. No
individual plants were identified during this survey.
Noxious Weeds
To help weed managers prioritize their noxious weed control, the Colorado Noxious Weed Act (Act)
classifies noxious weeds into three categories: List A, List B, and List C. List A species are rare
noxious weeds in Colorado that require eradication under the Act. List B species are noxious weeds
that have discreet populations in the state, and are slated for eradication, containment or
suppression depending on their geographic location in the State. List C species are noxious weeds
that are widespread and well established in the State. Control for List C species is recommended but
not required by the Act.
Several species of noxious weeds were documented within the Permit Area (see Figure 4).
Although noxious weeds have been documented and mapped within the Permit Area, the survey
was not designed to document all occurrences of noxious weeds within the boundary. As such,
other locations of these weed species may be present:
• Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) State List B, Garfield County noxious weed
• Downy brome (cheetgrass) (Bromus tectorum) List C
• Field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis) List C
• Hoary cress/white top (Cardaria draba) State List B, Garfield County noxious weed
• Hound's tongue (Cynoglossum officinale) State List B, Garfield County noxious weed
As the majority of the Permit Area is under active cultivation, noxious weeds occurred mainly on
the edges of the cultivated areas, and along the irrigation ditches in the area. The documented
noxious weeds occurred at low densities throughout the landscape. Downy brome was documented
in dry areas along existing roads, and on the dry hillside south of the Permit Area. Due to its
abundance, this species was not mapped.
3.0 Section 4-502 (D): Land Suitability Analysis
Part 11. Natural Habitat
Existing Flora, Fauna, and Migration Routes
3.1 Flora
See Section 2.3 above.
3.2 Fauna
See Section 2.2 above.
3.3 Migration Routes
According to Colorado Division of Wildlife's Natural Diversity Information Source GIS data, most of
the wildlife species inhabiting the Cerise Parcel are year-round residents. Table 3 lists wildlife and
range types within one mile of the Cerise Parcel (CDOW-NDIS 2009).
Table 3. Wildlife and range tes within one mile of the Cerise Parcel (CDOW-NDIS 20091.
Species
Range Types
Mammals
Black Bear (Ursus americanus)
Human Conflict Area
Fall Concentration
Overall Range
Mule Deer (Odocoileus hemionus)
Critical Winter Range
Severe Winter Range
Winter Concentration Area
Winter Range
Summer Range
Highway Crossing
Resident Population
Overall Range
Elk (Cervus elaphus)
Severe Winter Range
Winter Concentration Area
Winter Range
Highway Crossing
Overall Range
Mountain Lion (Felis concolor)
Overall Range
Birds
Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus)
Roost Sites
Winter Forage
Winter Range
4.0 Section 4-502 (E) Impact Analysis
Part (8) Environmental Effects
4.1 Determination of the long term and short term effect on the flora and fauna
4.1.1 Flora
As the majority of the Cerise Parcel has previously undergone disturbance from agricultural
activities, habitats exhibit little vegetative diversity, few native species and overall, little
resemblance to their optimal state. Native vegetation communities have been significantly
diminished and seeded rangeland species and weeds have become the dominant species. Native
vegetation does occur along Crystal Springs Creek, however mining activities would not occur in
these areas. Based upon this existing condition of vegetative habitats in the Permit Area, mining
activities are not likely to decrease the ecological value of the area. Noxious weeds currently
documented in the area, as well other noxious weeds that may be brought in on earth moving
equipment, would be managed according to management recommendations made by the Colorado
Department of Agriculture's noxious weed program. In addition, final reclamation would provide
more diverse and higher quality habitat than the current conditions.
4.1.2 Fauna
Although the exact Plan of Operations including mitigation measures to protect wildlife species
have not been finalized at this time, it is not likely that the proposed project would adversely affect
wildlife species. Direct and indirect impacts to wildlife would likely depend on several factors: 1)
sensitivity of the species to human activity; 2) seasonal and daily timing of construction and
development activities; and 3) availability of similar habitats outside of the project area.
A majority of the habitat on the Cerise Parcel has been altered by agricultural practices. Impacts
associated with disturbance of this habitat is likely to have minor impacts to wildlife species as
many of the species utilizing habitats on the property (e.g., rabbits, coyotes, skunks, raccoon,
rodents) are habitat generalists, meaning they are not tightly restricted to specific habitat types,
and higher quality habitats are located in close proximity to the proposed Permit Area. In addition,
although some of the resident wildlife species utilizing the property may be temporarily displaced
by the proposed mining activity, final reclamation would provide more diverse and higher quality
habitat for wildlife currently utilizing the site.
4.2 Determination of the effect on designated environmental resources, including
critical wildlife habitat
4.2.1 Wetlands
The proposed access to the Cerise Mine site would cross Crystal Springs Creek. This crossing will
include installation of a culvert and placement of dredged or fill material in the existing wetlands
along Crystal Springs Creek. Based upon these potential impacts, Lafarge will contact the Army
Corps of Engineers in order to obtain the necessary permits or jurisdictional determinations
pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water prior to construction activities.
4.2.2 Flora
As no Federally designated critical habitat for vegetative species have been identified in the Permit
Area, the proposed Cerise project would have no effect on these areas. The CNHP has identified
four Potential Conservation Areas (PCA) within five miles of the Project Area. Based on the CNHP
records, the closest area occurs immediately south of the Permit Area along the Roaring Fork River.
This PCA is currently fragmented from the Permit Area by Colorado State Highway 82, and mining
activities are not proposed in this area. As such, the proposed project would not affect designation
of the PCA.
4.2.3 Fauna
As no Federally designated critical habitat for wildlife species has been identified in the Permit
Area, the proposed Cerise project would have no affect on these areas. The Permit Area has been
identified by the Colorado Division of Wildlife as Critical Winter Range for Mule Deer. Mining
activities would not only decrease the available habitat for this species and but would also deter use
of adjacent habitats due to noise and human activity. The CDOW has reviewed the potential
impacts associated with these proposed activities, and have not expressed concerns over this loss
of habitat (CDOW 2010).
Project Location
COLORADO
Legend
—1+ Permit Boundary
CI Approximate Property Boundary
— — Streams
0
300 600 1,200
Feet
E
Lafarge West, Inc.
Cerise Mine Property
Garfield County, Colorado
Project Area
August 2010
Figure 1
Buys & Associates, Inc.
Project Location
COLORADO
Legend
Lail Permit Boundary
e2 Approximate Property Boundary
—•••- Streams
•—• Irrigation Ditch
Landcover Types
Cottonwood Area
255
510
_ - Dry Hillslopes
Hay Field
Pinyon -Juniper Area
KPasture
cs Residential
C3Water Ponding Area
1,020
Feet
Lafarge West, Inc.
Cerise Mine Property
Garfield County, Colorado
Cover Types
August 2010
Figure 2
Buys & Associates, Inc.
Project Location
COLORADO
Legend
L.? Permit Boundary
Approximate Property Boundary
O Photo Points
----- Streams
0
300
600
1,200
Feet
E
Lafarge West, Inc.
Cerise Mine Property
Garfield County, Colorado
Photo Points
August 2010
Figure 3
Buys & Associates, Inc.
Project Location
COLORADO
Legend
41 Permit Boundary
CI Approximate Property Boundary
Weed Species
r Houndstongue
Field Bindweed
K Whitetop
( Canada Thistle
—•••- Streams
255 510
1,020
Feet
Lafarge West, Inc.
Cerise Mine Property
Garfield County, Colorado
Noxious Weeds
August 2010
Figure 4
Buys & Associates, Inc.
• oto •oint 1- Pastur-
a)
t
4-
0
z
3-
0
z
uJ
w
N
s
Q cra
xto
0
C
CL) o
CI. 0
Q
40
V)
Photo point 2 — Irrigation ditch in hay field
4-,
0
z
t
0
N
0
C
r+
S
Z
0
rt
S
ni
CU
1/1
r*
N
7-7
M y
'V -0
S 'O
O rD
O Q.
-I X
°1 • D
S
N
• oto •oint4—Water sone in: are.
0
z
t
0
Additional photos of water ponding area
Photo point 5 — Southeast corner of the property
t
/-
0 0
z
t
D
0
0
c
.-1-
=
+s
trl
r+
z
0
r+
m
CI)
V,
r+
Photo point 6 — Irrigation tailwater drainage area.
Photo point 7 — Cottonwood area in southern portion of property
U-1
0
z
0
V)
0
c
S
aSeu!eap olu! Supej
m
SD
cri
8 mod o;oyd
VI
7-7
M D
S"0
OP Q.
CM X
ms
D
S
N