Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication- PermitGARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING, SANITATION and PLANNING DEPARTMENT 109 8th. Street, Suite 303 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601(970) 9458212 No. 7580 Job Address J �o ICS l 1 g �'11�1.1'C (,fa Nature of Work Bu ;iai ,G Permit y� o�� l ��Lk i Use of Building Owner 0442Ate Contractor 46-WW2/CA Amount of Permits C 4/010-91, e€A44‘4":"6-e_k5-- /¢67.aS te-e,etcfk• (j -k -IL-1- 953.-7/ avaa.9� Date �] 2 a 7 c Clerk GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION GARFIELD COUNTY (GLENWOOD SPRINGS), COLORADO 384-5o 03 INSPECTION LINE: (970) PERMIT NO. (750 PARCEL/SCHEDULE NO. TELEPHONE: (970) 945-8212 ti -JOBADDRES.. (. leDtJ/I eg.EMEie. ..'Pf'I vc /CL/I7/ �J CO 0I.S_C T J LOT NO. / J j BLOCK NO. / SUBDIVISION/EXEMPTION �A7 7 C�� A fe- 7 /I/ L-4.'9 E.' r OWNpt.L�n �NN C- Hi9idC,C- ADD _ -1-0. 1S.9rre4:� 6-irr /'& a- z y1' ARAC/A/ 74= Co S/ls33 .7. b'_S---_S-052 w"t _Sr) rn 3 CONTR//� . 1 �7 �f�//1� Cr `F7 /7 /� r� A _J/1 �i�%� 4.1 !1iset e 7N:75:4414-:-y1J - � Arl i) ItC. NO C.i4/1m !7'vr `. 4 ARctIIEL-rmuawEa� Kusr/ Al A/ -d z, eIVic/ S y.4 2 c?c' 4:iz•4/�%I.n / ADDRESS /� ac--- Z-3/6 �,�I r, .JiA 2-/aN� G) PIC 2i'' - I i8 — LTC NO. eQ. sr. aP aumncaa 47:t 2 6 p 6 SQ Pr. OF LOT 41 di T/ S U M/5,,rr �i ...�— No. 0! FLOORS 6 x t E OF BUILDING 7 , ..I - 7 DESCRIBE WORE: 8 CLAM Of WORK: CNEW GADOtt1ON oAL1ERAT1ON GROVE GR>DtOVE OARAOE:7 OUNCRE )OuHLR CARPORT: GIWUF DDOLINE 10 ..- G DRIVEWAY PERMIT oON MITE IMAGE DISPOSAL (SEPTIC) CUTE PLAN VALUATIONADMITTED r5VALUATION OF WORK: E ADIVALUAIION:a l r 1 l `) ` OD J d 7 SPECIAL CONDITIONS: NOTICE A SEPARATE ELECIRICAI, PERMR IS REQUIRED AND MUST BE ISSUED COLORADO. THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WTI']iIN 180 DAYS, OR IF WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 180 AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED.�} I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS KNOW TILE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED WITH WHETHER HEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PROVISIONS OF ANY LOCAL LAW REGUTATING CONSTRUCTION OR THE PERFORMANCE CONS CTIONGG, ,, �J�% �i'i, -Al-d i �' i Jam' abL --' Date BY THE STATE OF CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION OR DAYS AT ANY TIME APPLICATION AND OF LAWS SPECIFIEDOCC: PRESUME TO GIVE OTHER STATE OR OF �1 t� % — I I ` 0 0 notice ---1 . PLAN CHECK E: �� PE.RMIIT FEE: 47� TOTAL FEE: / y g O + q •il•? S/ DATE PERMIT ISSUED: CONST: TYPE: 4/ GROUP: R3 .. H / ZONING SETBACKS: igtunre of OPmar, Convector ora agent having read and understood SidMANU. HOME: 15DS NO,, WE: /(") 111/ Building Dept. ate Planning . A ate AGREEMENT PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO THE APPLICANT AS OWNER. CONTRACTOR ANDIOR THE AGENT OF THE CONTRACTOR OR OWNER TO CONSTRUCT THE STRUCTURE A6 DETAILED ON PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SUBMITTED TO AND REVIEWED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. IN CONSIDERATION OF THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT, THE SIGNER HEREBY AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL BUILDING CODES AND LAND USE REGULATIONS ADOPTED B7 GARFIELD COUNTY PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GIVEN IN 30.28.201 CRS AS AMENDED. THE SIGNER FURTHER ACJREES THAT IF THE ABOVE SAID ORDINANCES ARE NOT FULLY COMPLIED WITH IN THE LOCATION, ERECTION, CONSTRUCTION AND USE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED STRUCTURE, THE PERMIT MAY THEN BE REVOKED BY NOTICE FROM THE COUNTY AND THAT THEN AND THERE 1T SHALL BECOME NULL AND VOID. THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT BASED UPON PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA SHALL NOT PREVENT THE BUILDING OFFICIAL FROM THEREAFTER REQUIRING Till CORRECTION OF ERRORS IN SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA OR FRO PREVENTING BUILDING OPERATION BEING CARRIED ON THEREUNDER WHEN P` VIOLATION OF THIS. CODE OR ANY OTHER ORDINANCE OR REGULATION OF THIS JURISDICTION. THE REVIEW OF THE SUBMITTED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND INSPECTIONS CONDUCTED THEREAFTER DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ACCEPTANCE OF AN: RESPONSIBILITIES OR LIABILITIES BY GARFIELD COUNTY FOR ERRORS, OMISSIONS OR DISCREPANCIES. THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THESE ITEMS AND IMPLEMENTATION DURING CONSTRUCTION RESTS SPECIFICALLY WITH THE ARCHITECT, DESIGNER, BUILDER AND OWNER. COMMENTS ARE INTENDED TO BE CONSERVATIVE AND IN SUPPOR'1 OF THE OWNERS INTEREST. Oarformoo3 1 HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE AGREEMENT ABOVE. The following items are required by Garfield County for a final inspection: 1. A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector; 2. Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department posted where readily visible from access road; 3. A finished roof, a lockable house, complete exterior siding, exterior doors and windows installed, a complete kitchen with cabinets, a sink with hot & cold running water, non-absorbent kitchen floor coverings, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove and refrigerator, all necessary plumbing; 4. A complete bathroom, with wash bowl, tub or shower, toilet stool, hot and cold running water, non-absorbent floors and walls finished and a privacy door; 5. All steps outside or inside over three (3) steps must have handrails, guard rails on balconies or decks over 30" high constructed to all 1994 UBC requirements; 6. Outside grading done to where water will detour away from the building; 7. Exceptions to the outside steps, decks and grading may be made upon the demonstration of extenuating circumstances, i.e. weather, but a Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until all the required items are completed and a final inspection made. A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. ****CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (C.O.) IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O, WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATION PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET. I understand and agree to abide by the above conditions for occupancy, we andtheissuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the dwelling under building permit # 't z/- /y- c)c, nature Date bpcont j,-4 - oe Cv'ee/( czbr, Q130144'117.04 .14/I' #@147.60 -all /r8'0) 34-4.00 GARhG e ]'. f 11/ cc, 00 v3.26 O0 /04..)-)14.4-1.)24. Ti Z5- 214{A O. 94- 180,366.00 + 13,032.00 + 21,725.00 + n l t YG G i Y 215,124.00 * GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN DeVORE, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS — GEOLOGISTS 1441 Motor St. Grand Junction, CO 81505 April 5, 2000 Don Chance 854 Battlement Parkway # B204 Parachute, CO 81635 Re: Subsurface Soils Exploration 356 Roan Creek Dr., Battlement Mesa, CO TEL: (970) 242-8968 FAX: (970) 242-1561 As requested, Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore personnel have completed a geotechnical exploratory program at the above referenced site. Four shallow exploration pits were excavated within the proposed building pad by the client. These exploration pits were excavated to a total depth of 3 'A to 4 feet below the present ground surface. These exploration pits were logged and sampled by personnel of Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore on 3-21-00. The purpose of these pits were to determine the types and character of the underlying soils and to relate these characteristics to the proposed foundation system. This letter contains general recommendations for construction of a residential foundation, but is not a foundation design and cannot be used as such. Our conclusions and recommendations for this site are presented below. Soil Classification: The soils on this site consist of an alluvial debris -fan deposit which is quite thick and extremely stratified. This debris fan originates on the middle and upper slopes of Battlement Mesa to the east southeast, along the Battlement Creek and Monument Gulch Drainages. The stratification within this debris fan feature ranges from silt, sandy silt and silty clay in the finer portions and gravely silty clays to silty gravel, cobbles and boulders in the coarser portions. Many strata of the finer grained soils are of low to very low density and exhibit compressible and metastable (collapsible) properties. The soil profile indicated a very thin fine grained soil cover, ranging from less than 6 inches to up to 2 % feet thick. This fine grained soil is underlain by a very gravelly, rocky soil. The matrix of this rocky soil is essentially the same as the upper fine grained soil. The exploration pits were very shallow and, this report will assume that the building foundation will be placed within the upper 2 to 3 feet of the existing soil profile. It is extremely important that the open excavation for this structure be very carefully observed by Geotechnical personnel, in order to determine ifthe conclusions from these very shallow exploration pits are appropriate for this site. The soils encountered on this site, which are anticipated to be utilized for foundation bearing, were classified as a rocky gravel with silt and lean clay fines. Using the Unified Classification System, these soils are a clayey gravel (GC). This material is of low plasticity, of moderate permeability and was encountered in a low to medium density, slightly moist condition. The surface soils were very moist due to recent precipitation. The fine grained strata of these soils may undergo moderate amounts of consolidation upon saturation or over loading. Some silty strata may undergo slight to moderate amounts of collapse upon saturation. In general, these very rocky soils, if pre-treated by extensive on site controlled water soaking and compaction, exhibit slight to occasionally moderate compressible properties. Due to the very rocky character of these lower foundation soils, undisturbed samples for laboratory testing could not be obtained. Based upon our previous experience in this area, with the soils, after water soaking to achieve moisture conditioning to a minimum depth of 24 inches below the final foundation subgrade elevation, these soils normally exhibit a maximum allowable Don Chance Subsurface Soils Exploration, 356 Roan Creek Dr., Battlement Mesa, CO April 5, 2000 Page 2 bearing capacity on the order of 3000 psf. A minimum dead load of 200 psf is strongly recommended, due to the presence of lean clay soil. These rocky soils are typically encountered as thin to moderately thick (3 foot to over 10 foot) strata and are normally underlain by low density, compressible and possibly collapsible (metastable) low plastic to nonplastic alluvial silt. Due to the underlying layers of compressible and possibly collapsible soil, the grading, drainage and soil compaction recommendations given in this report are considered extremely important. Man-made Fill` The soils encountered in these 4 very shallow exploration pits appear to be native to the site. All building foundations must penetrate any man-made fills which are present at the site at this time, as well as any fills which result from the excavation process. Careful examination of the open excavation will be necessary to determine the presence or absence of man-made fills. The open excavation must be examined prior to the placement of concrete to establish that materials of proper design bearing capacity have been exposed and that no soft spots or debris are present in the foundation area. A 24 hour notice is required for all field examinations to enable Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore to schedule personnel and provide service when needed. Soil Moisture Conditions: The soils in the excavation at foundation level were found to be damp to moist. No free water was noted in the shallow excavations. The upper 12 to 18 inches of the soil profile was very moist to wet, due to recent precipitation. The soil moisture content was found to decrease with depth. It is anticipated that at a depth of 5 to 6 feet below the present ground surface, these soils will be found in a desiccated or very dry condition. Foundation TVDe Recommended: A properly designed shallow foundation system of the standard continuous spread footing and stem wall type, based upon the recommendations provided in this report has been prepared by Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore, a copy of that design is attached. The foundation system must be constructed in strict compliance with our plans and specifications, with no alterations or devia- tions allowed unless prior approval is first obtained from this office. The foundations are to be placed on native soils which have been water conditioned (pre-soaked) to a depth of at least 24 inches below the footings. These water conditioned upper soils should be compacted to a minimum of 90% of the soils maximum modified dry density, ASTM D-1557. Voids Beneath Foundation Walls: Voids are not required for this foundation design. Reinforcing: All foundation stem walls should be designed as "grade beams" capable of spanning at least 13 feet. Where the foundation stem walls are relatively shallow in height, vertical reinforcing will not be necessary. However, in the walls retaining soil in excess of 4 feet in height, vertical reinforcing may be necessary to resist the lateral pressures (restrained case) of the soils along the wall exterior. To aid in designing such vertical reinforcing, an equivalent fluid pressure (E.F.P) on the order of 50 pcfwould be appropriate for the native soils. The foundation shall be reinforced as shown on the foundation design. No changes shall be made to this placement of reinforcing without written approval of the design engineer or architect. Don Chance Subsurface Soils Exploration, 356 Roan Creek Dr., Battlement Mesa, CO April 5, 2000 Page 3 Floor Slabs: Non -Structural floor slabs on grade, if any, should be positively separated from all structural portions of this building and allowed to float freely. Frequent scoring (control joints) of the slabs should be provided to allow for possible shrinkage cracking of the slab. These control joints should be placed to provide maximum slab areas of approximately 200 to 360 square feet. Any man-made fill placed below floor slabs on grade should be compacted to a minimum of 90% of its maximum Modified Proctor dry density, ASTM D-1557. These soils should be placed at a moisture content conducive to the required compaction (usually Proctor optimum moisture content ±2%. Drainage and Grading: Adequate site drainage should be provided in the foundation area both during and after construction to prevent the ponding of water and the wetting or saturation of the subsurface soils. We recommend that the ground surface around the structure be graded so that surface water will be carried quickly away from the building. The minimum gradient within 10 feet of the building will depend on surface landscaping. We recommend that paved areas maintain a minimum gradient of 2%, and that landscaped areas maintain a minimum gradient of 8%. It is further recommended that roof drain downspouts be carried at least 10 feet beyond all backfilled areas and discharged a minimum 15 feet away from the structure. Proper discharge of roof drain downspouts may require the use of subsurface piping in some areas. Under no circumstances should a 'dry well discharge' be used on this site, unless specifically sited by a Geotechnical Engineer. Planters, if any, should be so constructed that moisture is not allowed to seep into foundation areas or beneath slabs or pavements. The existing drainage on the site must either be maintained carefully or improved. We recommend that water be drained away from structures as rapidly as possible and not be allowed to stand or pond within 15 feet of the building or foundation. We recommend that water removed from one building not be directed onto the backfill areas of adjacent buildings. Should an automatic lawn irrigation system be used on this site, we recommend that the sprinkler heads, irrigation piping and valves be installed no less than 10 feet from the building. In addition, these heads should be adjusted so that spray from the system does not fall onto the walls of the building and that such water docs not excessively wet the backfill soils. It is recommended that lawn and landscaping irrigation be reasonably limited, so as to prevent undesirable saturation of subsurface soils or backfilled areas. Several methods of irrigation water control are possible, to include, but not limited to: * Metering the Irrigation water. * Sizing the irrigation distribution service piping to limit on-site water usage. * Encourage efficient landscaping practices. * Enforcing reasonable limits on the size of high water usage landscaping within 5 feet of the building or foundation. * Incorporating `xeriscaping' landscaping pad irrigation techniques. A plastic membrane placed on any Crawlspace ground surfaces may retain/trap excessive amounts of water beneath the membrane. If future moisture problems develop or are anticipated, the Foundation Design Engineer Don Chance Subsurface Soils Exploration, 356 Roan Creek Dr., Battlement Mesa, CO April 5, 2000 Page 4 or the Geotechnical Engineer may require that the membrane be partially or completely removed from the crawlspace area. - Provided all recommendations found herein pertaining to site surface drainage, grading and soil compaction are closely followed, a perimeter foundation drain would not be required. For fully finished basements, however, the use of a perimeter foundation drain would significantly reduce potential moisture related problems which can arise from subsequent area development. Backfill: To reduce settlement and aid in keeping water from reaching beneath this building, all backfill around this building should be mechanically compacted to a minimum of 90% of its maximum Modified Proctor dry density ASTM D-1557. The only exception to this would be the components of the perimeter foundation drain, if any. All backfill should be composed of the native soils and should not be placed by soaking, jetting or puddling. All backfill placed in utility trenches around this structure or below foundation walls should be mechanically compacted to a minimum of 90% of its maximum Modified Proctor dry density ASTM D-1557. These soils should be placed at a moisture content conducive to the required compaction (usually Proctor optimum content +2%). Cement Type: Type II, Type I-II or Type I1 -V cement is recommended for all concrete which is in contact with the soils on this site. Calcium chloride should not be added to a Type II, Type I-II or Type H -V cement under any circumstances. Remarks: We recommend that the bottom of all foundation components rest a minimum of 3 feet below finished grade or as required by the local building codes. Foundation components must not be placed on frozen soils. Senate Bill 13 (CRS 6-6.5-101) Discussion; This particular residence is being constructed on foundation soils which do not possess a "significant potential for expansion". We recommend that the owner receive a copy of this summary report of our soil analysis and site recommendations. Limitations: This report is issued with the understanding that it is the responsibility of the owner, or his representative to ensure that the information and recommendations contained herein are brought to the attention of the architect and engineer for the project, and are incorporated into the plans. In addition, it is his responsibility that the necessary steps are taken to see that the contractor and his subcontractors carry out these recommendations during construction. The findings of this report are valid as of the present date. However, changes in the conditions of a property can occur with the passage of time, whether they be due to natural processes or the works of man on this or adjacent properties. In addition, changes in acceptable or appropriate standards may occur or may result from legislation or the broadening of engineering knowledge. Accordingly, the findings of this report may be invalid, wholly or partially, by changes outside our control. Therefore, this report is subject to review and should not be relied upon after a period of 3 years. The recommendations of this report pertain only to the site investigated and are based on the assumption that the soil conditions do not deviate from those described in this report. If any variations or undesirable conditions are encountered during construction or the proposed construction will differ from that planned on the day of Don Chance Subsurface Soils Exploration, 356 Roan Creek Dr., Battlement Mesa, CO April 5, 2000 Page 5 this report, Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore should be notified so that supplemental recommendations can be provided, if appropriate. Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore makes no warranty, either expressed or implied, as to the findings, recommendations, specifications or professional advice, except that they were prepared in accordance with generally accepted professional engineering practice in the field of geotechnical engineering. Respectfully submitted, GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN-DeVORE, INC. By: Qa�0•REoiS' 30590 )4.. �i.• Edward M. Morris PE/ + •z Principal Engineer GJLD Job # 87948 -GJ SOILS DESCRIPTIONS awe& WA Th 0 to •e 0 • Qt., . •. r• f QE5CRIPTION Topsoil . Organic Man -Made FId GW Gravel Well -Graded GP Gravel Poorly -Graded GM Silty Gravel GC Clayey Gravel SW Sand Well -Graded SP Sand Poory-Graded SM Silty sand SC Clayey Sand ML Silt Low -Plastic CL Silty Clay Law -Plastic OL Organic Silt 8 Clay Low -Plastic • MH Sin High -Plastic CH clay High -Plastic OH Organic Clay High -Plastic Pt Peat u00 • GW/GM Silty Gravel II• tlo •• • . Well -Graded GW/GC Clayey Gravel Weil -Graded GPIGM silty Gravel Poorly -Graded GP/GC Clayey Gravel P GM/GC Silty ClayeyGravel SW/SM Silty Sand Well -Graded SW/SC Clayey Sand Well -Graded SP/SM Silty Sand Poorly -Graded SP/SC Clayey Sand SM/SC Silty Poorly-Graded CLIML Silty Clay -Clayey Silt Low -Plastic ROCK DESCRIPTIONS UNE& BM= Sadfmadary Rock' CONGLOMERATE •0:-b MIN moo • • • /• -w •l• 4:111b 111. •A4 Amp' A 7 i • Q SANDSTONE SILTSTONE SHALE CLAYSTONE MUDSTONE COAL LIMESTONE DOLOMITE MARLSTONE GYPSUM Other Sedimentary Rocks l timx Rocks GRANITIC ROCKS DIORITIC ROCKS GABBRO BASALT RHYOLITE TUFF & ASH FLOWS BRECCIA & Other Volcanics Other Igneous Rocks Meamorohk Rocks GNEISS SCHIST PHYLLITE HORNFELS METAQUARTZITE MARBLE Other Metamorphic Rocks GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN - DeVORE, Inc. Geotechnical Consultants Grand Junction, Colorado SYMBOLS & NOTES num pescwPTloK SPT Standard Penetration Drive 09112 ASTM D-1586 Disturbed Sample Numbers Indicate 9 Blows To drive the Spoon 12" Into ground. CS 'California Uned Sampler' 09112 Modified Penetration Drive ASTM D- Disturbed Sample Numbers indicate 9 Blows To drive the Spoon 12" Into ground. D&M 'Dames & Moore Uned Sampler' 09112 Modified Penetration Drive ASTM 0- Disturbed Sample Numbers Indicate 9 Blows To drive the Spoon 12" Into ground. ST Thin -Walled 'Shelby' Tube ASTM D-1588 - 2.625"od 2.5" Id 'Reiativey Undisturbed Sample' BULK Wx 4 Disturbed, Bulk Sample ASTM D- Disturbed Sample Free Water Table Weathered Rock Formation Test Boring Location Test Pit Location Seismic or Resistivity Station Standard Penetration Drives are made by driving a standard 2' od, 1-5/8" id Split Spoon Sampler into the ground by dropping a 140 Ib. weight 30". No Thinwall Shoe Extension and the Sample is Disturbed. Modified Penetration Drives are made by driving a 2-12" od, 1.875" id California Spoon Sampler or a 3" od, 2-3/8" id California Spoon Sampler Into the ground by dropping a 140 Ib. weight 30". No Thinwall Shoe Extension and the Sample is Disturbed, The Boring Logs show subsurface conditions at the dates and locations shown, and It is not warrented that they are representative of subsurface conditions at times and other locations. EXPLANATION OF BOREHOLE LOGS AND LOCATION DIAGRAMS Form No. GJLDFORM-EXPL Drawn EMM Date 10-15.98 3-D TopoQuade Copyright 01999 D ,Lerme Yarmouth. ME 04096 2000 ft sale: 1: 50.000 Detail: 120 Daum: WG4114 SITE LOCATION DIAGRAM GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN - DeVORE, Inc. Geotechnical Consultants Grand Junction, Colorado 356 Roan Creek Drive Battlement Mesa, Colorado Don Chance Parachute, Colorado Date 4-5-2000 Job No. 87948 -CJ Drawn AM DEPTH (FT.) 5 SOIL LOG _ TEST PtT NO. 1 PIT LOCATION & ELEV.: NORTHEAST QUARTER OF LOT SHEAR Torvane 5011 DENSITY WATER DESCRIPTION psf pcf °4 / 0 • p 0 8 0 a CL THIN / LEAN CLAY and LOW -PLASTIC SILT -TOPSOIL' 5.5% GC CLAYEY GRAVEL with BOULDERS UP TO 18" 1 DEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS STRATIFIED INCREASING SILT FINES VERY ROCKY LOW to MEDIUM DENSITY 5 GRAVELS and BOULDERS are BASALT & OCC. SANDSTONE GRAVELS and BOULDERS are BASALT & OCC. SANDSTONE 10 15 10- 15 Pit Total Depth: Pit Excavated By: 3.5' NO Free Water Rubber Tired Backhoe, Client During Excavation: 3-21-2000 DEPTH (FT.) 5 10 SOIL LOG TEST PIT NO. 2 Prr LOCATION & ELEV.: SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF LOT SHEAR Torvane SOIL DENSITY WATER DESCRIPTION psf pcf °k 0 r b cCr'j' CL THIN / LEAN CLAY and LOW -PLASTIC SILT -TOPSOIL' 5.5% LEAN CLAY with GRAVELS and BOULDERS UP TO 18" DEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS STRATIFIED GC CLAYEY GRAVEL with SAND SL. MOIST BULK I INCREASING SILT FINES 5 VERY ROCKY LOW to MEDIUM DENSITY GRAVELS and BOULDERS are BASALT & OCC. SANDSTONE 10 15 15— lit Total Depth: Pit Excavated By: 4' NO Free Water Rubber Tired Backhoe, Client During Excavation: 3-21.2000 LOG OF SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN - DeVORE, Inc. Geotechnical Consultants Grand Junction, Colorado 356 Roan Creek Drive Battlement Mesa, Colorado Don Chance Parachute, Colorado Date 4-5-2000 Job No. 879 -t8 -G3 Drawn AM DEPTH (FT.) 5 10 15 SOIL LOG TEST PIT NO. -3 PIT LOCATION & ELEV.: SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF LOT SHEAR Torvane SOIL DENSITY WATER DESCRIPTION psf per °% / o 4 0 ' b THIN / LEAN CLAY and LOW -PLASTIC SILT - TOPSOIL' 12.1% GC CLAYEY GRAVEL with BOULDERS UP TO 18" 1 DEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS STRATIFIED INCREASING SILT FINES VERY ROCKY LOW to MEDIUM DENSITY 5 GRAVELS and BOULDERS are BASALT & OCC. SANDSTONE GRAVELS and BOULDERS are BASALT & OCC. SANDSTONE 10 10 15 Pit Total Depth: Pit Excavated By: 3.5' NO Free Water Rubber Tired Backhoe, Client During Excavation: 3-21-2000 2 DEPTH (FT.) 5 10 SOIL LOG TEST PIT NO. 4 PIT LOCATION & ELEV.: NORTHWEST QUARTER OF LOT SHEAR Torvane SOIL DENSITY WATER DESCRIPTION pef pcf • CL THIN / LEAN CLAY and LOW -PLASTIC SILT - 'TOPSOIL' 12.1% N DEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS V. MOIST BULK GC CLAYEY GRAVEL. with SAND SL. MOIST 1 LOW to MEDIUM DENSITY 5 GRAVELS and BOULDERS are BASALT & OCC. SANDSTONE 10 15 15— Pit Total Depth: 4' NO Free Water Pit Excavated By: Rubber Tired Backhoe. Client During Excavation: 3-21-2000 LOG OF SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN - DeVORE, Inc. Geotechnical Consultants Grand Junction, Colorado 356 Roan Creek Drive Battlement Mesa, Colorado Don Chance Parachute, Colorado Date 4-5-2000 Job No. 87948 -GJ Drawn AM Soil Sample: Clayey Gravel with Sand (GC) Geologic Origin: Debris Fan Deposits Sample No.: I (Typical) Test by: LRS Natural Water Content (w): 5.6% In -Place Density (pcf): Test Pit: 2 Depth: 3' Soil Specific Gravity (Gs): COBBLE to ORAVEL 00 - - I BAND 1 SILT to CLAY 1 Effective size Cu Cc Plastic Limit (PL) Mg 90 - - _ 80 70 so _ Liquid Limit (LL) ,WA' Plasticity Index (PI) 10% Shrinkage Limit (SL) Shrinkage Ratio DIRECT SHEAR: CD Ult. Shear Angle: deg. Tan Shear: Cohesion: psf • so •••• • .... • 40 ... 34 , 20 . - • ... 10 o 125 75 50 37.5 25 Its Particle 12.5 9 Grain 5 4.115 2 Size 0.85 fmml 0.425 0.15 0.1a 0.02 0.005 Sieve 5" 3" 2" 1.112" 1" 314" 1/2" 3/8" 14 110 120 140 1100 1200 (mm) 125 75 50 37.5 25 19 12.5 9.5 4.75 2 0.85 0.425 0.15 0.075 0.02 0.005 % Passing 100 78 67 64 63 58 55 51 47 40 29.4 20 12 Maximum Size Ailoyved By Sampler 2-112" MOISTURE 1 DENSITY RELATIONSHIP: ASTM Method: Max. Dry Density : Optimum Moisture : HVEEM-CARMANY: 'R' Value 300 psi: Displacement 300 psi: Expansion © 300 psi: ALLOWABLE BEARING (net): Standard Penetration (SPT): Unconfined Compression (qu): CONSOLIDATION: mm Res. D-698 9 D 4718 - 30% Correction pcf pcf SULFATE SALTS: PERMEABILITY: K (20 C) Remolded psf ESQ ppm FHA Soil Swell: % Swell psf Remolded Sample psf psf psf psf 9m/sec @ pcf SOIL ANALYSIS and SUMMARY GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN - DeVORE, Inc. Geotechnical Consultants Grand Junction, Colorado 356 Roan Creek Derive Battlement Mesa, Colorado Don Chance Parachute, Colorado Date 4-5-2000 Job No. 87948 -GJ Drawn AM Soil Sample: Lean Clay (CL) Geologic Orrin: Debris Fan Deposits i 1 Sample No.: Test by: II (Typical) LRS Natural Water Content (w): In -Place Density (pcf): 12.1% Test Pit: 4 Depth: Soil Specific Gravity (Gs): COBBLE to GRAVEL 1 SAND 1 SILT to CLAI 90 ---..m....\ 80 70 eo 5o 40 30 1 20 10 -- 0 r - A 125 75 50 37.5 25 _1i 12.5 9 5 4,75 2 . 0.85 r 0.425 0.15 0.Q 0.02 0.005 Sieve 5" 3" 2" 1-1/2" 1" 3/4" 112" 3/8" #4 #10 #20 *40 *100 #200 (mm) 125 75 50 37.5 25 19 12.5 9.5 4.75 2 arucie Grain Size mm % Passing 0.85 0.425 0.15 0.075 0.02 0.005 100 99 98 88.9 Maximum Size Allowed 13Y. amoier 2-1/2 1' Effective size Cu Cc Plastic Limit (PL) Liquid Limit (LL) Plasticity Index (P1) Q Shrinkage Limit (SL) Shrinkage Ratio DIRECT SHEAR: CD Ult. Shear Angle: deg. Tan Shear: Cohesion: psf MOISTURE 1 DENSITY RELATIONSHIP: ASTM Method: D-698 AA Max. Dry Density : Optimum Moisture : HVEEM-CARMANY: 'R' Value © 300 psi: Displacement 300 psi: Expansion 0 300 psi: psf ALLOWABLE BEARING (net): Standard Penetration (SPT): psf Unconfined Compression (qu): psf CONSOLIDATION: psf mm Res. D 4718 - 30% Correction pcf pcf FHA Soil Swell: % Swell psf Remolded Sample SULFATE SALTS: PERMEABIUTY: K (20 C) Remolded (� psf ppm cm/sec Cc0 pcf SOIL ANALYSIS and SUMMARY 2 r GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN - DeVORE, Inc. Geotechnical Consultants Grand Junction, Colorado 356 Roan Creek Drive Battlement Mesa, Colorado Don Chance Date Parachute, Colorado 4-5-2000 Job No. Drawn 87948 -GJ AM CRITICAL DRAINAGE ZONE TWICE THE WIDTH OF THE ORIGINAL EXCAVATION LIMIT ( VARIES - MINIMUM OF 5 FEET FROM BUILDING ) ROOF DOWNSPOUT SOIL PREPARED 6" to 8" DEEP TO LANDSCAPE. 'LOW LOW WATER USE' TYPE PLANTS and/or-XERISCAPING" TECHNIQUES WITHIN THE 'CRITICAL DRAINAGE ZONE'. GROUND SLOPE ACROSS LANDSCAPING THE NATIVE SOILS BELOW THE 'CRITICAL DRAINAGE ZONE' TO BE RCWORKED & COMPACTED FOR A MINIMUM OF 12 INCHES TILLED for LANDSCAPING SOIL BACKFILL COMPACTED TO MINIMIZE WATER SEEPAGE 70 THE FUUNDA7ION SOILS .41-''—"..---'-" PVC pRAINA6E PIPE .1--- EXCAVATION LIMIT--- 4__ �� eg'..4 1:0)--J — — - PERIPHERAL DRAIN and 4- din PVC INSTALLED as per CFOTECHNICAI ENGINEER �� SPECIFICATIONS - AS REQUIRED ISI 11 11 II 11 DRAINAGE / LANDSCAPING CONCERT 'LOW WATER' & PERIMETER DRAT\ r CRITICAL DRAINAGE ZONE TWICE THE WIDTH OF THE ORIGINAL EXCAVATION LIMIT ( VARIES - MINIMUM Of 5 FEEL FROM BUILDING ) ROOF DOWNSPOUT 111 11 11 11 II II GROUND SLOPE ii ACROSS LANDSCAPING.4iir ati AING_-77 R .:.e o o° °e'. �°o�:'''� n,,:•.;•1.‘ -LANDSCAPE FABRIC BENEATH I CRAvEL/MULCH COVER `,sok � COMPACTED TO I I TO MINIMIZE I rJ I � WATER SEEPAGE TO THE FOUNDATION SOILS EXCAVATION LIM!T --�r1 [( .�04•:;:4i tiI 1 PERIPHERAL DRAIN and 4. dLo. PVC INSTALLEO 05 per GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER SPECIFICATIONS AS REQUIRED 50/t PREPARED 6" to 8- DEEP 70 LANDSCAPE. USE 'LOW WATER USE' TYPE PL ANTS and/or '.XERISCAPINC" TECHN10UE5 WITHIN THE 'CRITICAL DRAINAGE ZONE'. DRAIN POPE THENATIVE SOILS BELOW THE 'CRITICAL DRAINAGE ZONE' TO BE REWORKED dr COMPACTED FOR A MINIMUM OF 12 INCHES DRAINAGE / LANDSCAPING CONCEPT 'NO WATER ZONE' & PERIMETER DRAIN GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN— DeVORE, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS -GEOLOGISTS EXTERIOR DRAINAGE / LANDSCAPING CONCEPT rfne. 8-18-98 SCALE. Tlt. / { NONE I D— DRAIN 1 • GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING 970-945-8212 MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS for SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING CONSTRUCTION including NEW CONSTRUCTION ADDITIONS ALTERATIONS and MOVED BUILDINGS In order to understand the scope of the work intended under a permit application and expedite the issuance of a permit it is important that complete information be provided. Adequate and complete information will prevent delays in the plan review process. Reviewing a plan and the discovery that required information has not been provided by the applicant may result in the delay of the permit issuance and in proceeding with building construction. The owner or contractor may be required to provide this information before the plan review may proceed. This causes delays because other plans that are in line for review may be given attention before the new information may be reviewed after it has been provided to the Building Department. Please review this document to determine if you have enough information to design your project and provide adequate information to facilitate a plan review. If you do not, it may be helpful to obtain a book titled "Dwelling Construction under the Uniform Building Code". This book is available to you through this department at our cost. Also, please consider using a design professional for assistance in your design and a construction professional for construction of your project. To provide for a more understandable plan in order to determine compliance with the building, plumbing and mechanical codes, applicants are requested to review the following check List prior to and during design. Applicants are required to indicate appropriately and to submit the completed check List at time of application for a permit. 1 January 1, 1999 Plans to be included for a Building Permit, must be on drafting paper at least 18"x24" and drawn to scale. Plans must include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations all sides with decks, balcony, steps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the finish grade line. A section showing in detail, from the bottom of the footing to the top of the roof, including re -bar, w 1 r anchor bolts, pressure treated plates, floor joists, wall studs and spacing, insulation, sheating, house- rap, (which is required), siding or any approved building material. A window schedule. A door schedule. -- -- A floor framing plan, a roof framing plan, roof must be designed to withstand a 4 er ft. up to 7,000 F.O.S. and an 80 M.P.H. wind. All sheets to be identified by number and indexed. All of the above requirements must be met or your plans will be returned. 1. Is a site plan included that indicates the distances of the proposed building or addition to property lines, other buildings, setback easements and utility easements? Yes rte' 2. Does the site plan include the location of the Y. S.D.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System) and the distances to property lines, wells (on subject property and adjacent properties), streams or water courses? Yes AVA 5:94ri,-/- y 3. Does the site pian indicate the location and direction of the County or private road accessing the property? Yes 4. Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all reinforcing steel in accordance with the uniform building code or per stamped engineered design? Yes 5. Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl spaces and the clearan"es required between wood and earth? Yes 6. Do the plans indicate the size and location of ventilation openings for the attic, roofjoist spaces's and soffits? Yes 7. Do the plans include design loads as required by Garfield County for roof snow loads, (a minimum of 40 pounds per square foot up to & including 7,000 feet above sea level), floor loads and wind loads? Yes 8. Does the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor and roof construction? Yes 9. Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists, wall studs, ceiling joists, roof rafters or joists or trusses? Yes 10. Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method of positive connection of all columns and beams? Yes 11. Does the plan indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the highest point of the building or addition measured at mid span between the ridge and the eave down to existing grade contours? Yes 12. Does the plan include any stove or zero clearance fireplace planned for installation including make and model and Colorado Phase II certifications or phase H EPA certification? Yes r/ No 13. Does the plan include a masonry fireplace including a fireplace section indicating design to comply with the Uniform Building Code Chapter 37? Yes No 14. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that egress/rescue windows from sleeping rooms and/or basements comply with the requirements of the Uniform Building Code? Yes '' No I5. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that windows provide natural light and ventilation for all habitable rooms? Yes ,/ No 3 16. Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass doors, glazing immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as a walking surface; sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub enclosures and specify safety ng for these areas? Yes No 17. Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces, boilers and water heaters indicated on the p147? Yes No 18. Do you understand that if you are building on a parcel of land created by the exemption process or the subdivision process, are building plans in compliance with all plat notes and/or covenants? Yes ,/- No 19. Do you understand that if you belong to a homeowners association, it is your responsibility to obtain written permission from the association, if required by that association, prior to submitting an application for a building permit? If you do not have written permission from the association, do you understand that the plan check fee will not be refunded should the architectural committee deny or reject your building plans? Yes j No 20. Will this be the only residential structure on the parcel? Yes � No If no -Explain: 21. Have two (2) complete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the application? Yes 22. Do you understand that the minimum size a home can be on a lot is a 20ft. x 20ft.? Yes ,/ No 23. Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other construction code requirements? Yes ✓ No 24. Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a final inspection by the Garfield County Building Department? Yes ✓ No 25. Do you understand that approval for design and/or construction changes are requiredprior to the app? tion of these changes? Yes No 4 26. Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a "Plan Review" fee from you at the time of application and that you will be required to pay the "Permit Fee" as well as any "School Impact" or "Septic System" fees required, at the time you pick up your building permit? Yes „,--~ No 27. Are you aware that twenty-four (24) hour notice is required for all inspections? Inspections will be made from Battlement Mesa to West Glenwood in the mornings and from Glenwood Springs to Carbondale in the afternoon. Morning inspections must be called in by 12:00 p.m. the day before; afternoon inspections must be called in by 5:00 p.m. the day before. Failure to give twenty-four (24) hour notice for inspections will delay your ins ection one (1) day. Inspections are to be called in to 384-5003. Yes No 28. Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the Uniform Building Code including approval on a final inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancyand ccupancy of the building? Yes No 29. Are you aware that the person signing the Permit Application, whether the "Owner", "Agent of the Owner", "General Contractor", "Contractor" or otherwise, is the party responsible for the project complying with the Uniform Building Code? Yes ✓ No 30. Are you aware that prior to issuance of a building permit you are required to show proof of a driveway access permit or obtain a statement from the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department stating one is not necessary? You can contact the Road & Bridge Department at 625-8601. Yes No I hereby acknowledge that I have read, understand and answered these questions to the best of my ability. signature Phone: '2 rS - S- L 7 (days); date va€) -=>./9/72 (evenings) Project Name: /770tu Amu sit -=-11/41C&" Project Address: 3 4 ,0,/l/y�JIE"k_ .-7 / VE f ,0 4 cf/0r (1::(1) g' /6.3C, — til 1!_,h.v/ti, t)6S E"�c/fs r,/17/5//,4,) l�. F1 T/ E?. 10E-5/) 5 Notes: If you have answered "No" on any of the questions, you may be required to provide this information at the request of the Building Official prior to beginning the plan review process. Delays in issuing the permit are to be expected Work may not proceed without the issuance of a permit. If it is determined by the Building Official that additional information is necessary to review the application and plans to determine minimum compliance with the adopted codes, the application may be placed behind more recent applications for building permits in thereview process and not reviewed until required information has been provided and the application rotates again to first position for review, delay in issuance of the permit or delay in proceeding with construction. bpminreq 1/00 6 O v. .A 'fl • CIO Q Z ° ") i 6'2/-4 z Lr. 0 w g col0 z° w " 0 y O • a) i0 O ,-co co k- ▪ -0 U • eti v .`2 1. • V! eta ro ��� ts 0- c N c as -o .o 0c .r • vs 0 ..= 'C >, a-, 0 o co RI aOoZj c x v; 40 c ) Ego 1994 Building Cede Setbacks: 25 feet front and rear and 10 feet on the fides Snowload: 401bs. /sq. ft. up to 7000 feet Seismic: Zone 1 Windshear: 80 mph Wind exposure: B Windload: 151bs. fsq. ft. Frost Depth: 36 inches -30 inches from finished grade to top of footing (Liveload is snowload-imposed by snow) INSPECTION WILL NOT BE MADE UNLESS THIS CARD IS POSTED ON THE JOB 24 HOURS NOTICE REQUIRED FOR INSPECTIONS BUILDING PERMIT GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO Date Issued+.... . .. Zoned Area Permit No 1S .N AGREEMENT In consideration of the issuance of this permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with al laws and regulations related to the zoning, location; construction and erection of the proposec structure for which this permit is granted, and further agrees that if the above said regulation! are not fully complied with in the zoning, location, erection and construction of the abov( described structure, the permit may then be revoked by notice from the County Building Inspector and IMMEDIATELY BE ME ULL AND VOID. Use 6._gtA Addres Legal Descri 'on Ow e Q� i az contfactoP This Card Must Be Posted So It is Plainly Visible From The Street Until Final Inspection. • X003 THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE Phone 1141141100m, 109 8th Street County Courthouse Glenwood Springs, Colorado. APPROVED DO NOT DESTROY THIS CARD iki!eSOE? By�l � IF PLA ED OUTSIDE - COVER WITH CLEAR PLASTIC INSPECTION RECORD Footing 4 �_op Gsx Foundation Insulation p� A% •t0 . 6 6..00 Underground Plumbing Rough Plumbing cg_ 3p _ Drywall 10 _ ,0b A,� Chimney & Vent ._ Electric Final (by Sta Inspectorti opQK' Gas Piping c 7� tio-,t) .� /` Finalr"�►V 2 �. / _ Cr//� / rill/ Electric Rough (By State Inspector) 9/gyp. Septic Final Framing 9 -1102..-0.> ) w _ (To include Roof in place and Windows and Doors installed). w Notes: ALL LISTED ITEMS MUST BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE COVERING - WHETHER INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR, UNDERGROUND OR ABOVE GROUND. wis. ai M— mo. • X003 THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE Phone 1141141100m, 109 8th Street County Courthouse Glenwood Springs, Colorado. APPROVED DO NOT DESTROY THIS CARD iki!eSOE? By�l � IF PLA ED OUTSIDE - COVER WITH CLEAR PLASTIC