The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutApplication- Permit1 1, Job Address GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING, SANITATION, and PLANNING DEPARTMENT 109 8th, Street, Suite 303 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601(970) 945-8212 1(o3 W i tlaw G -a02 Tr.) Nature of Work Building Pei mi.t: Use of Building F vY f 'r J C� Owner r� 1 }/ 119ifl) i l It Contractor (� �' ` �'� g`� j r0a Amount of Permit £ 3 t• 611 Date L 1. I pkLn dw! g®v /��. �1 .' (i 3qa ^aS No. 7389 Clerk GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION TELEPHONE: (970) 945-8212 Applicant to Complete numbered spaces only. PERMIT NO. GARFIELD COUNTY (GLENWOOD SPRINGS), COLORADO I 's 1 INSPECTION LINE: (970) 945-9159 PARCEL/SCHEDULE NO. TOB ADDRESS: / G 3 (i17..t. h\ki (FAQ R O "" k, rocLA4, ,Co F tc3� 1 LOT NO. BLOCK NO. UB IVIS ION � Willow cri9.9 age 2 4 pi7 6Kkk 2 OwN>� Lu 1 ' William Atkinson it "a�� 3 COMMA R • . - a "•. •a n1 ADDRFae •: :. -10 1141 PH: o he .4 o • 8_ i .,4, �c Ta' 1 i) C1 --� 2990059 4 AIlLtQ1YCT/iN@®l Li urn] - r)re 114�41 Motor St Grand Jct L CO 970-242-$96 Nk ' X 0590 5 aSC)PT. OPaemmro 2265 s yi'��! �� SPr bcci I F S `Jt`� /0 SCS' tmr¢tc2O' 6" t+o.o ROOM 6 I:eEOFHuampD regiriPnr•p 7 DHIQSH WOW RIi11 a pew 22.5 sa' residence 8 oAes OP WORK: MEW gADDmon DAL79.ATION MIME IMOSOVE x 9 oARAnH WaW78 DDOUacH CAIPOR?: DalNatp ODOMM R4 �i,ll 10 D D0IVHWAY must DON MS SEWAGE DOPWAL (SEPTIC) WTTH PIAN VALUATION OF WORM $ MEWED VAWATICKf L %y .2. 0 , 2�C7 . V Q i� v SPECIAL COMMONS: 684 e° 3 dr''• 99 NOTICE�]� A SEPARATE ELECTRICAL PERMIT IS REQUIRED AND MUST BE ISSUED BY THE STATE OF COLORADO. THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL. AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZED LS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 110 DAYS, OR IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 110 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EKAM]NED THIS APPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS THIS GOVERNING IS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. rue GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHOR/TY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PROVISIONS • ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULATING CO ' CTT a. OR is PERFORMANCE OF CONSTR. ON. / �. dh ...wan/IC` P : �' \ PLAN CHECK FEE: o �j/ ?e, �( ! /!hh PERMIT FEE �1'� Q r TOTAL FEE:.DATE PERMIT ISSUED: Cy/, J�p9� 21 1 9 / 1 OCC: CROUP: CONST: TYPE: �� u ZONING: l SETBACKS: Sipa-ofOwner, Cantnolorora ..-17.0r:,.1havingroadandunderstood •tiwabove. • 1 ' i // 7/ MANU. HOME: ISDS NO. FEE: N A Building Der. Approval/Data Planning Dept. . 1 Data AGREEMENT PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO THE APPLICANT AS OWNER, CONTRACTOR AND/OR THE AGENT OF THE CONTRACTOR OR OWNER TO CONSTRUCT THE STRUCTURE AS DETAILED ON PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SUBMITTED TO AND REVIEWED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. IN CONSIDERATION OF THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT, THE SIGNER HEREBY AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL BUILDING CODES ANI) LAND USE REGULATIONS ADOPTED BY GARFIELD COUNTY PURSUANT TO AUTHORLTY GIVEN IN 30.21101 CRS AS AMENDED. THE SIGNER FURTHER AGREES TFIAT IF THE ABOVE SAID ORDINANCES ARE NOT FULLY COMPLIED WITH IN THE LOCATION. ERECTION, CONSTRUCTION AND USE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED STRUCTURE, THE PERMIT MAY THEN BE REVOKED BY NOTICE FROM THE COUNTY AND THAT THEN AND THERE IT SHALL BECOME NULL AND VOID. THE. ISSUANCE OF A PERmiT BASED UPON PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER. DATA SHALL NOT PREVENT THE BUILDING OFFICIAL FROM THEREAFTER REQUIRING TFIE CORRECTION OF ERRORS N SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA OR FRO PREVENTING BUILDING OPERATION BEING CARRIED ON THEREUNDER WHEN IN VIOLATION OF THIS CODE OR ANY OTHER ORDNANCE OR REGULATION OF THIS JURISDICTION. THE REVIEW OF THE SUBMITTED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND INSPECTIONS CONDUCTED THEREAFTER DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ACCEPTANCE OF ANY RESPONSIBILITIES OR LIABILITIES BY GARFIELD COUNTY FOR ERRORS. OMISSIONS OR DISCREPANCIES THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THESE ITEMS IMPLEMENTATION DURING CONSTRUCTION RESTS SPECIFICALLY wmi THE ARCHITECT, DESIGNER. BUILDER AND OWNER. COMMENTS ARE INTENDED TO BE CO AND IN SUPPORT OF THE OWNERS INTEREST. i//JJ Cwrfeuu.uo3 1 HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE AGREEMENT ABOVE. (INITIAL) -• 101`119 �-�� The following items are required by Garfield County for a final inspection: 1. A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector; 2. Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department posted where readily visible from access road; 3. A finished roof, a lockable house, complete exterior siding, exterior doors and windows installed, a complete kitchen with cabinets, a sink with hot & cold running water, non-absorbent kitchen floor coverings, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove and refrigerator, all necessary plumbing; 4. A complete bathroom, with wash bowl, tub or shower, toilet stool, hot and cold running water, non-absorbent floors and walls finished and a privacy door; 5. All steps outside or inside over three (3) steps must have handrails, guard rails on balconies or decks over 30" high constructed to all 1994 UBC requirements; 6. Outside grading done to where water will detour away from the building; 7. Exceptions to the outside steps, decks and grading may be made upon the demonstration of extenuating circumstances, i.e. weather, but a Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until all the required items are completed and a final inspection made. A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. ****CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (C.O.) IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATION PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET. I understand and agree to abide by the above conditions for occupancy, use and the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the dwe)ling under building permit # `13 ?II Signature bpcont Date William & Erna Atkinson Residence Dwelling 2,301 s.f. @ $69.00 = $158,769.00 Garage 845 s.f. @ $18.00 = $ 15,210.00 Crawl space 2,123 s.f. @ $ 9.00 = $ 19,107.00 Covered patio&porch 300 s.f @ $24.00 = $ 7,200.00 Valuation = $200,286.00 Permit Fee $1,392.25 Plan Review Fee $ 904.96 Total $2,297.21 16. Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass doors, glazing immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as a walking surface; sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub enclosures and specify safety glazing for these areas? Yes No 17. Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces, boilers and water heaters indicated on the plan? Yes X No 18. Do you understand that if you are building on a parcel of land created by the exemption process or the subdivision process, are building plans in compliance with all plat notes and/or covenants? Yes y No 19. Do you understand that if you belong to a homeowners association, it is your responsibility to obtain written permission from the association, if required by that association, prior to submitting an application for a building permit? If you do not have written permission from the association, do you understand that the plan check fee will not be refunded should the architectural committee deny or reject your building plans? Yes V No 20. Will this be the only residential structure on the parcel? Yes y No If no -Explain: 21. Have two (2) complete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the application? Yes v 22. Do you understand that the minimum size a home can be on a lot is a 20ft. x 20ft.? Yes X No 23. Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other construction code requirements? Yes V No 24. Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a final inspection by the Garfield County Building Department? Yes V No 25. Do you understand that approval for design and/or construction changes are required prior to the application of these changes? Yes ( No 4 '26. Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a "Plan Review" fee from you at the time of application and that you will be required to pay the "Permit Fee" as well as any "School Impact" or "Septic System" fees required, at the time you pick up your building permit? Yes ' No 27. Are you aware that twenty four (24) hour notice is required for all inspections? Inspections will be made from Battlement Mesa to West Glenwood in the mornings and from Glenwood Springs to Carbondale in the afternoon. Morning inspections must be called in by 12:00 p.m. the day before; afternoon inspections must be called in by 5:00 p.m. the day before. Failure to give twenty four (24) hour notice for inspections will delay your inspection one (1) day. Inspections are to be called in to 945-9159. Yes Y No 28. Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the Uniform Building Code including approval on a final inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy and occupancy of the building? Yes y No 29. Are you aware that the person signing the Permit Application, whether the "Owner", "Agent of the Owner", "General Contractor", "Contractor" or otherwise, is the party responsible for the project complying with the Uniform Building Code? Yes y No 30. Are you aware that If you are accessing a county road and do not have an existing driveway you will reed to acquire a driveway permit from Garfield County Road and Bridge? Their phone number is 945-6111. You will need to show proof prior to the issuance of the building permit. I hereby acknowledge that I have read, understand and answered these questions to the best of my ability. 9-57- 9 9 date Phone: 92 d - a y.3 -'/o'g (days); ,5` E (evenings) Project Name: Ariel -,t/ soi/ ieesj'pE,veer Project Address: /‘3 Xlr(/Oh✓ ePE6/X B97/:cr, wr 5 BATTLEMENT MESA SERVICE ASSOCIATION ARCHITECTURAL COMMITTEE APPLICATION & CHECKLIST (for New Home Construction projects) Homeowner: William and Erna Atkinson Home 'Aniline Address: 8 Meadow Drive !ghee Wy 26003-1302 Home Phone 304-242-0337 - Work Phone (if desired): N/A Project Address: 163 Willow Creek Trail Production Homeplan Name (if applicable): Lot: 2 Block: 4 Subdivision: _ w Creek Vi 7 t a N/A ge Homebuilder: Hilgenfeld Construction Business Mailing Address: tunctian Business Phone: 970-243-4048 RI Fax (if desired): Submittal Date: 6-1-99 Estimated Start Date: 7-15-99 Estimated Completion Date: 1 1-1 9 -clic) SUB\IITTAL REQUIREj\IENTS: Two copies each of items 1, 2%& 4 need to be submitted. (Check -off items attached to the Application. Fill in spaces as indicated.) I. Site Plan Drawing (1"=I0' or I"=?0' scale) with the following information shown: Lot, Block & Subdivision name. —7- Street Address of Project. Building Setback Lines (also fill-in the shortest distance between property line to the exterior wall closest to that property line). Please be aware that all Building Setback Lines are taken from your Property Line Pins !! Your Property Line is not the Curb Line !I Dwelling Unit Garatre Front Setback: 32' feet 32' feet Left Side Setback: 16 8" feet 8 ' 8" feet Right Side Setback: 9' 2" feet N/A feet Rear Setback: 18'8" feet N/A feet v/ Utility Easements. w/ . 55' Clear Site -Line at Intersection Corner Lots. Site Grading Elevations & Drainage. First (main) Floor Height in relation to top of street curb at front -center of lot Driveways (include width of driveway), ‘Valkways, Patios, etc. N/A Outbuildings a:Ibmsaac.ap2.draft031698 Page 2 of 5 2. Architectural Drawings (1/4" _ !' or !/8 = 1' scale) with following information shown. Floor Plan(s) with overall dimensions (fill-in the following square foot areas). N/A First Floor Finished Living Area: Second Floor Finished Living Area: Lower Floor Finished Living Area: Total Finished Living Area: Total Unfinished Living Area: Garage Area: 2265 square feet N A square feet square feet 22_6_5._ square feet N/A square feet 845 square feet Building Elevations Plans indicating doors, windows, exterior materials, building height, roof pitch, roof -mounted evaporative coolers, etc. (fill-in maximum height below). Maximum building height to highest ridgeline or building structural projection 20'9" feet above top of street curb elevation at front -center of your lot. Engineered Foundation Pian. Outbuildings indicating dimensions, elevations and overall height to ridgeline. ✓ 3. Exterior Materials (fill-in the selections below): ✓ Roofing Material: Tamtcra Hpri t3$f'- 10_4- ar Architectural shingles V Primary Siding Material: Synthpf it Sturro Accent Siding,Material: N/A Trim Nlarerial: Synthptir Sturro and aluminum clad wood ✓ Masonry Material: N/A .� Stucco Material: Synthetic Stucco Front Door Material: Therma Tru *CC76 • Garage Door Material: insulated steel COLOR SAMPLE a:\bmsaac.ap2.draft031698 Color: Color: Color: Color: _ usive Fawn Alcoa Royal Brown Color: N/A Color: Sherwin-Wi1Uarpo Illusive Fawn Classic—Craft fikwrglass wood—look White (window fratite also White) Tamko Weathered Wood Sherwin—Williams Illusive Fawn N/A Color: Color: IIlusFve Fawn SW1072 COLOR SAMPLE Page 3 of 5 COLOR SAMPLE Landssaping/piartinel.plan will 'ba $uktnitted'to the ACC upon arrival of Ovners to Colorado. .1. L4ndscape/Irrlgation Plans wirh the following inrorrtat:on7 Planting Pian (indicate areas of irrigated lawn, tree placement, shrub beds, gr,undcove;, etc.), Plant Material Listing by species of trees and shrubs. Groundcover Material with weed control barrier. Fences. Other Landscape improvements (decks, lite lighting, flag poles. eta.), 5, Application Fee (payable to Battlement Mesa Service Association Architectural Committee): The BMSAIAC may require the applicant to pay directly, or to reimburse the BMSA/AC for payment of, any fees or outside consultants or any 'Costs incurred by the BIvMSA/AC in its research, review or consideration of this application (per Section 9.6, Amended and Rfsened Declaration), I/We herby acknowledge and understand that am failure to complete Homeplan or Improvement Projects or "Landscaping Construction within the time constraints noted in Conditions 2. & 3. on Page 3 of this Application will result in a Notice and opportunity for a Hearing before the BMISA Board of Directors, and if IfWe are found in violation of these Conditions at the Hearing will result inn fine to the Owner of not less than 3500.00 per month for coach full month in excess of the ailotted completion time frame. UWe hereby acknowledge that Homepl►in or'Improvement Projects or Landscape Construction features which nre built in non-conformance with this full npplic:atton, including the Conditions of Approval noted on Plage 5 of 5 herein, UVYe will be cited by the BNISAJAC in written citation form at the time of discovery. In extenuating circumstances a Variance may be requested from the BiISAJAC, provided such Variance request item is within the Purview and approval jurisdiction of the BMSA/AC. If a Variance is not granted by the BIVISA/AC and if rhe Non - Conforming Items are not corrected within 60 days sifter the date of written citation, IAVe will be served Notice and o'pportuniry for a Hearing before the BMSA Bo:ard of Directors, Clad if Tr'e'e aro found In %lolntion'of these Son -Conforming. Items at the Hearing will be fined a minimum of 5500 per Non -Conforming item. Failure to pay fines levied ns determined at the Hearings may also result in a Lien being placed on our Property or Litigation Process Initiated .by the BMSA Boerci of Directors to ae:ure conformance with this full Appliention and its respective Conditions Of Approval. [IWe further acknowledge that any subsequent field changes which I/We may desire to the Homeplaans or improvement Projects of this„orIginaal, Application Submittal and the original Conditions of 'Approval issued by the BMISA/) C will require an-ndditionaal Revised AppIicntion Submittal on our behalf, arid that I/Wr a will Jnot4'.proceed.with any subsequent field changes until a Revised Conditions of Approval have been issued'to us by the BMISA/AC. Owner's Signature(1)1 O rear ee,.) Bulkier's Signature) anbmsa ae.ap2.dreft03169e 167 Willow Creek Trail rlarne(i): =-r_ 7^(2'*tat IZt�( [ty:+G ate: Print Name' Page 4of5 Date: This portion of the Application Form to be completed by the Architectural Committee (not the Applicant). CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL No sitework or building construction may proceed on any Lot (including no preliminary site clearing, grubbing, grade alteration, storing of material, foundation excavation, extension of underground utilities, etc.) until the Project has received a Project Approval from the Architectural Committee and has been issued a Building Permit (as required by Garfield County for New Home or Renovation projects). 2. All general building and site improvements construction for any Project shall be completed and shall have issued a Certificate of Occupancy from the Garfield County Building Dept. no later than one {I) year after the issuance date of this Architectural Committee Approval. 3. The completed landscaping and revegetation of the improved Lot, to specifically include the front, side and rear yard areas, shall be completed no later than six (6) months from the date of Certificate of Occupancy. An additional maximum four (4) month extension may be granted by the Architectural Committee if the Certificate of Occupancy was issued shortly prior to the non -growing winter months such that landscape construction could not diligently proceed; however, in any event, the landscaping construction shall be fully complete no later than ten (10) months from the date of Certificate of Occupancy. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Application_ Apgygval (Mit' slot rchitectur mmittee M� ers): By: �.��' Application Approved f Constru tion sub' t to the ab.conditions: By Chairman:(--- hairman: /�lt— Z Application Denied (Initials of Architectural Committee Members): By: Application Denied: By Chairman: a:\bmsaac.ap2.draft031698 Page 5 of 5 Date: 72- //1J'r' Date: f GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN DeVORE, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS — GEOLOGISTS 1441 Motor St. Grand Junction, CO 81505 December 27, 1999 Hilgenfeld Construction 683 25 Rd. Grand Junction, CO 81505 Re: Open Excavation Observation 163 Willow Creek Trail, Battlement Mesa, CO TEL: (970) 242-8968 FAX: (970) 242-1561 As requested, Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore personnel have completed a foundation excavation evaluation at the above referenced site. The purpose of this observation and evaluation was to determine the type and condition of the soils on the site and to relate their engineering characteristics to foundation reactions of the proposed structure. This letter contains general recommendations for construction of a residential foundation, but is not a foundation design and may not be used as such. Our conclusions and recommendations for this site are presented below. Soil Classification; The soils on this site consist ofan alluvial debris -fan deposit which is quite thick and extremely stratified. This debris fan originates on the middle and upper slopes of Battlement Mesa to the east southeast, along the Battlement Creek and Monument Gulch Drainages. The stratification within this debris fan feature ranges from silt, sandy silt and silty clay in the finer portions and gravely silty clays to silty gravel, cobbles and boulders in the coarser portions. Many strata of the finer -grained soils are of low to very low density and exhibit compressible and metastable (collapsible) properties. The soils at foundation level on this site visually classified as alluvial, low density silt of moderate to moderately high compressive and slight with pockets of moderately severe metastable properties. This upper soil is believed to be in excess of 50 feet thick. These soils have been over excavated up to 24 inches thick, in preparation for the placement of structural fill. The allowable bearing capacities of these upper subgrade soils on this site are variable, between 50 to 1400 psf maximum and 150 psf minimum. After the placement of structural fill, the soils will have an allowable bearing capacity, at the base of the footing, of 1600 psf maximum. A minimum bearing of 200 psf should be utilized for the reworked native soils. In-place soil density tests were taken within the building excavation on the subgrade soils on 11-10-99. These in-place soil density tests indicate the native soils have a dry density ranging from 93 to 94 pounds per cubic foot. Some low density pockets or spots were observed. Densities of this magnitude indicate these native soils, in near proximity to the footings, possess moderate compressible and possible collapsible properties. Soft areas were indicated by these initial density tests taken on 11-10-99 and soft areas observed by personnel of Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore on that date. Unless specifically noted, this site observation, any associated testing and the reworking/compaction of the soils at foundation level, addresses only the soils within 1 to 2 feet below the bottom of the building foundation excavation. It is possible that soil conditions which may affect the performance of this foundation system are present below the depth of soil compaction by the contractor and the testing performed by Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore. The grading and drainage recommendations are considered very important for the long term stability of this foundation system and the structure. Man-made Fill: Soils in the original excavation appear to be native to the site. Personnel of Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore observed the recently placed structural fill on the above referenced site on 11-15-99. The structural fill was found to consist of approximately 18 to 24 inches of reworked native soils. In-place soil density tests 1 Hilgenfeld Construction Open Excavation Observation, 163 Willow Creek Trail, Battlement Mesa, CO December 27, 1999 Page 2 taken on the structural fill indicated that compaction was either equal to or in excess of 90% of the modified proctor density (ASTM D-1557) for these materials. The structural fill appears to meet the minimum recommendations of the foundation design prepared by Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore. Soil Moisture Conditions: The soils in the excavation at foundation level were found to be damp to moist. No free water was noted in the excavation. Some moisture was added to the soils in the excavation by the contractor in order to obtain proper compaction. Foundation Type Recommended: A properly designed shallow foundation system of the standard continuous spread footing and stem wall type founded on structural fill, based upon the recommendations provided in this report has been prepared by Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore, a copy of that design is attached. The foundation system must be constructed in strict compliance with our plans and specifications, with no alterations or deviations allowed unless prior approval is first obtained from this office. Voids Beneath Foundation Walls: Voids are not required for this foundation design. Reinforcing: The foundation shall be reinforced as shown on the foundation design. No changes shall be made to this placement of reinforcing without written approval of the design engineer or architect. All foundation stem walls should be designed as "grade beams" capable of spanning at least 13 feet. Where the foundation stem walls are relatively shallow in height, vertical reinforcing will not be necessary. However, in the walls retaining soil in excess of 4 feet in height, vertical reinforcing may be necessary to resist the lateral pressures (restrained case) of the soils along the wall exterior. To aid in designing such vertical reinforcing, an equivalent fluid pressure (E.F.P) on the order of 55 pcf would be appropriate. Floor Slabs: Non -Structural floor slabs on grade, if any, should be positively separated from all structural portions of this building and allowed to float freely. Frequent scoring (control joints) of the slabs should be provided to allow for possible shrinkage cracking of the slab. These control joints should be placed to provide maximum slab areas of approximately 200 to 360 square feet. Any man-made fill placed below floor slabs on grade should be compacted to a minimum of 90% of its maximum Modified Proctor dry density, ASTM D-1557. These soils should be placed at a moisture content conducive to the required compaction (usually Proctor optimum moisture content +2%). Drainage and Grading: Adequate site drainage should be provided in the foundation area both during and after construction to prevent the ponding of water and the wetting or saturation of the subsurface soils. We recommend that the ground surface around the structure be graded so that surface water will be carried quickly away from the building. The minimum gradient within 10 feet of the building will depend on surface landscaping. We recommend that paved areas maintain a minimum gradient of 2%, and that landscaped areas maintain a minimum gradient of 8%. It is further recommended that roof drain downspouts be carried at least 5 feet beyond all backfilled areas and discharged a minimum 10 feet away from the structure. Proper discharge of roof drain downspouts may require the use of subsurface piping in some areas. Under no circumstances should a 'dry well discharge' be used on this site, unless specifically sited by a Geotechnical Engineer. Planters, if any, should be so constructed that moisture is not allowed to seep into foundation areas or beneath slabs or pavements. The existing drainage on the site must either be maintained carefully or improved. We recommend that water be drained away from structures as rapidly as possible and not be allowed to stand or pond within 15 feet of the building or Hilgenfeld Construction Open Excavation Observation, 163 Willow Creek Trail, Battlement Mesa, CO December 27, 1999 Page 3 foundation. We recommend that water removed from one building not be directed onto the backfill areas of adjacent buildings. Should an automatic lawn irrigation system be used on this site, we recommend that the sprinkler heads, irrigation piping and valves be installed no less than 10 feet from the building. In addition, these heads should be adjusted so that spray from the system does not fall onto the walls of the building and that such water does not excessively wet the backfill soils. It is recommended that lawn and landscaping irrigation be reasonably limited, so as to prevent undesirable saturation of subsurface soils or bacldilled areas. Several methods of irrigation water control are possible, to include, but not limited to: * Metering the Irrigation water. * Sizing the irrigation distribution service piping to limit on-site water usage. * Encourage efficient landscaping practices. * Enforcing reasonable limits on the size of high water usage landscaping within 10 feet of the building. * Incorporating `xeriscaping' landscaping and irrigation techniques. A plastic membrane placed on any Crawlspace ground surfaces may retain/trap excessive amounts of water beneath the membrane. If future moisture problems develop or are anticipated, the Foundation Design Engineer or the Geotechnical Engineer may require that the membrane be partially or completely removed from the crawlspace area. Provided all recommendations found herein pertaining to site surface drainage, grading and soil compaction are closely followed, a perimeter foundation drain would not be required. For fully finished basements, however, the use of a perimeter foundation drain would significantly reduce potential moisture related problems which can arise from subsequent area development. Backfills To reduce settlement and aid in keeping water from reaching beneath this building, all backfill around this building should be mechanically compacted to a minimum of 90% of its maximum Modified Proctor dry density ASTM D-1557. The only exception to this would be the components of the perimeter foundation drain, if any. All backfill should be composed of the native soils and should not be placed by soaking, jetting or puddling. All backfill placed in utility trenches around this structure or below foundation walls should be mechanically compacted to a minimum of 90% of its maximum Modified Proctor dry density ASTM D- 1557. These soils should be placed at a moisture content conducive to the required compaction (usually Proctor optimum content ±2%). Cement Type: Type II, Type I-II or Type II -V cement is recommended for all concrete which is in contact with the soils on this site. Calcium chloride should not be added to a Type 11, Type I-II or Type 1I -V cement under any circumstances. Remarks: We recommend that the bottom of all foundation components rest a minimum of 3 feet below finished grade or as required by the local building codes. Foundation components must not be placed on frozen soils. Senate Bill 13 (CRS 6-6.5-101) Discussion: This particular residence is being constructed on foundation soils which do not possess a "significant potential for expansion". We recommend that the owner receive a copy of this summary report of our soil analysis and site recommendations. • I-Iilgenfeld Construction Open Excavation Observation, 163 Willow Creek Trail, Battlement Mesa, CO December 27, 1999 Page 4 Limitations: This report is issued with the understanding that it is the responsibility of the owner, or his representative to ensure that the information and recommendations contained herein are brought to the attention of the architect and engineer for the project, and are incorporated into the plans. In addition, it is his responsibility that the necessary steps are taken to see that the contractor and his subcontractors carry out these recommendations during construction. The findings of this report are valid as ofthe present date. However, changes in the conditions of a property can occur with the passage of time, whether they be due to natural processes or the works of man on this or adjacent properties. In addition, changes in acceptable or appropriate standards may occur or may result from legislation or the broadening of engineering knowledge. Accordingly, the findings of this report may be invalid, wholly or partially, by changes outside our control. Therefore, this report is subject to review and should not be relied upon after a period of 3 years. The recommendations of this report pertain only to the site investigated and are based on the assumption that the soil conditions do not deviate from those described in this report. If any variations or undesirable conditions are encountered during construction or the proposed construction will differ from that planned on the day of this report, Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore should be notified so that supplemental recommendations can be provided, if appropriate. Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore makes no warranty, either expressed or implied, as to the findings, recommendations, specifications or professional advice, except that they were prepared in accordance with generally accepted professional engineering practice in the field of geotechnical engineering. Respectfully submitted, GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN-DeVORE, INC. By: Edward M. Moms Principal Engineer GJLD Job # 87501 -GJ CRITICAL DRAINAGE ZONE TWICE THE WIDTH OF THE ORIGINAL EXCAVATION LIMIT ( VARIES - MINIMUM OF 5 FEET FROM BUILDING ) ROOF DOWNSPOUT SOIL PREPARED 6` to 8` DEEP TO LANDSCAPE. USE LOW WATER USE' TYPE PLANTS and/or 'XERI$CAPING" TECHNIQUES WITHIN THE CRITICAL DRAINAGE 20NEU GROUND SLOPE ACROSS LANDSCAPING TILLED for LANDSCAPING THE NATIVE SOILS BELOW THE 'CRITICAL DRAINAGE ZONE' TO BE REWQRKED dr COMPACTED raft A MINIMUM OF 12 INCHES PVC DRAINAGE PIPE _,,..^i. EXCAVATION LIMIT r �. PERIPHERAL DRAIN and 4" (ha PVC INSTALLED as per GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER SPECIFICATIONS - A5 REQUIRED WATER SEEPAGE TO \THE FOUNDATION SOILS I Q r � � FJ ,.% �' *4.i m 1 ks SOL BACKFILL COMPACTED TO MINIMIZE DRAINAGE / LANDSCAPING CONCEPT 'LOW WATER' & PERIMETER DRAIN CRITICAL DRAINAGE ZONE TWICE THE WIDTH or THE ORIGINAL EXCAVATION LIMIT ( VARIES - M,NIMUM OF 5 FEET FROM BUILDiNC ) ROOF DOWNSPOUT SOIL PREPARED 6" to 8" DEEP TO LANDSCAPE USE 'LOW WATER USC' TYPE PLANTS and/or "XERISCAPING" TECHNIOUES WITHIN THE 'CRITICAL DRAINAGE ZONE'. GROUND SLOPE ACROSS LANDSCAPING Tr THE NATIVE SOILS BELOW THE *CP TICAL DRAINAGE ZONE* TO BE REWORKED dr COMPACTED FOR A MINIMUM OF 12 INCHES DRAIN PPE 11 e. ... o• ,.v gid.. ^�.: �.°r �-I 7 LANDSCAPE FABRIC BENEATH GRAVEL/MULCH COVER N $OIL BACKFILL COMPACTED TO MINIMIZE �+ 1 5 WATER SEEPAGE TO +k THE FOUNDATION SOLS EXCAVATION LIMIT �, ..%"4"41%i�I i PERIPHERAL DRAIN and 4' dlo. PVC INSTALLED as per GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER SPECIFICATIONS - AS REQUIRED DRAINAGE / LANDSCAPING CONCEPT 'NO WATER ZONE' & PERIMETER DRAIN GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN-- DeVORE, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS— GEOLOGISTS EXTERIOR DRAINAGE / LANDSCAPING CONCEPT °p'` 8-18-98 SCALL. NONE D—DRAIN1 ��y f GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN DeVORE, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS — GEOLOGISTS 1441 Motor St. Grand Junction, CO 81505 December 27, 1999 Hilgenfeld Construction 683 25 Rd. Grand Junction, CO 81505 Re: Garfield County Building Permit # 7389 163 Willow Creek Trail, Battlement Mesa, CO Gentlemen: TEL: (970) 242-8968 FAX: (970) 242.1561 Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore personnel have examined the in-place foundation footings at the above referenced site on 11-29-99. Our examination was based on foundation engineering drawings previously completed by Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore, Inc. for this site. All footings were the correct width and depth as per our foundation design. Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore personnel have observed the foundation reinforcing steel at the above referenced site on 11-29-99. Proper placement and quantity of steel reinforcing bars were found at the time of our observation. Therefore, it is our conclusion that the work done is in conformance with our previous recommendations for this site. We hope this letter has provided you with the information required. If questions arise or further information is needed, please feel free to contact Grand Junction Lincoln-DeVore at any time. Respectfully submitted, GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN-DeVORE, INC. by: Edward M. Morris PE Principal Engineer GJLD Job # 87501 -GJ RECEIVED FEB 0 ' 2000 INSPECTION WILL NOT BE MADE UNLESS THIS,CARD IS POSTED ON THE JOB 24 HOURS NOTICE REQUIRED FOR INSPECTIONS BUILDING PERMIT GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO Date Issued..!.! 2•6 ill...Zoned Area Permit No AGREEMENT In consideration of the issuance of this permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with all laws and regulations related to the zoning, Location; construction and erection of the proposed structure for which this permit is granted, and further agrees that if the above said regulations are not fully complied with in the zoning, location, erection and construction of the above described structure, the permit may then be revoked by notice from the County Building Inspector and IMMEDIATELY BE OME NULL AND VOID. Use Sir CI b3 s 1 Addre s or Ve liDescriptio I Owner. I trinetOat Contractor i fle ge4 Rear This Card Must Be Posted So It is Plainly Visible From The Street Until Final Inspection. pi 01(.1)4 Setbacka Front Side $ide INSPECTION RECORD Footing s . lill J . — V _._. rr _ . • •P ► i Foundation , _ .-4 _ ti / Cfi 1 { A .r s ,-0 i �...Z- Underground Plumbinga _ -t 0 — O is C - PlumbingInsulation Rough g SII �_ i,. Drywall S-- —era .11111.1111. Chimney & Vent 6,-o-- /MI Electric Final (by State Inspector) ' " Gas Piping ,,y 4911==Final g _ 1 L _00 A„3...- Electric Rough (By Stat £ nspector) ' ,; 'J > eptic Final raming ci—i;.- Z tI. (To include Roof in place an ' Windows and Doors installed). Notes: ALL LISTED ITEMS MUST BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE COVERING - WHETHER INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR, UNDERGROUND OR ABOVE GROUND. THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE Phone 945-9159 109 8th Street County Courthouse Glenwood Springs, Colorado. A P P R• V E D DO NOT DESTROY THIS CARD Dat 2. 1 By i! aei441 PLACED OUT 4 E - COV I R `,v TH CLEAR PLASTIC