The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1.0 Application72016 APPLICATION FOR ADU ON 5.2 ACRE PROPERTY This application requests approval of an ADU on approximately a 5.2 acre property (Section 29 Township 7 Range: 87. Parcel number 2391-291-06-002, Sloop Subdivision Exemption Lot 2. Plans call for an ADU constructed above a 3 car detached garage. This 5.2 acre property is served by existing utilities; Holy Cross and Source Gas are already in use to the existing home on the property. An existing well is located on the property and would be shared with the ADU. We have submitted well water samples to the state for testing. Due to the complexity of the Deluxe Colorado water test and the Alpha Beta test, we have not included the results in this application since the Colorado Department of Health is two weeks out from having any results. We would ask for a temporary waiver on these tests, and will submit the results as soon as we receive them. A new onsite waste water treatment system would be constructed to serve this ADU. Access to the site would be through an existing driveway directly off of County Road 102. The area for the unit has gentle slopes and grades, and less than one acre of site disturbance is anticipated. This acreage is agricultural in nature. Hopefully, all questions have been answered, and all documents have been submitted for review. Thank you, Glen Sloop Leslie Lewis 72016 APPLICATION FOR ADU ON 5.2 ACRE PROPERTY SECTION 7-101-ZONE DISTRICT USE REGULATIONS This property/application is zoned rural, and application is within restrictions and regulations set forth by Article 111 Zoning. SECTION 7-102-COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENTS This property/application is in general conformance with the Garfield County Comprehensive Plan and complies with applicable intergovernmental agreements. SECTION 7-103 COMPATIBILITY List of property owners within 200 ft. of property 1. North and west property is currently owned by applicant. 2. South Property line: Carol Duell 3. East Property line: Kings Row Subdivision Lot 1-Beverly Misunas Lot 49-Kippert Wheeler Lot 48-Adam Sahnow Lot 47-Bryn Peterson Vicinity Map attached Site Plan: Lot 2 is both flat, safe, and more than adequate and capable of complying with all applicable use restrictions, criteria, standards, and dimensional regulations of the Rural Zone District. There is an existing home on this Property that is located slightly more than 50 feet from the County Road I 02. This detached garage/ ADU is capable of complying with and will be subject to then existing use and dimensional regulations. SECTION 7-104-ADEQUATE WATER SUPPLY Lot 2 has sufficient legal and physical source of water, in compliance with the requirements of the Land Use Code set forth in Section 7-104 of Article VII. Lot 2 has been serviced and continues to be served by Well Permit 88276. Copies of Well Permit Attached. Copies of physical pump test demonstrating adequate physical supply of water, and water quality test results demonstrating compliance with Colorado Primary Drinking Water Standards attached. SECTION 7-105 WASTEWATER DISPOSAL A separate waste water system be constructed for this unit in compliance witb the requirements of the Land Use Code set forth in Section 7-106 of Article VII, Standards. Proper permits will be obtained. Documents attached SECTION 7-106-ADEQUATE PUBLIC UTILITIES Holy Cross provides electrical service to this Lot 2. The HC transformer pole is located on the property as duly noted on the attached hand drawn map. Applicant has adequate electricity for current house and proposed detached garage/ADU according to Holy Cross Energy, Rodney Sherman Foreman. Natural Gas (Source Gas) is piped to the existing house on Lot 2. Applicant does have an existing buried propane tank on the property, which has not been used or connected for 11 years. Owner reserves the right for future use. The tank is located approximately 30 feet from the north side oftbe house. SECTION 7-107 ADEQUATE ACCESS Lot 2 has legal and adequate access in compliance with the requirements of the Land Use Code set forth in Section7-108 of Article VII Standards This property is located adjacent and has direct access to County Road 102. County Road 102 is an east-west, paved, two lane roadway that runs along the eastern boundary of the property. The Applicant does not anticipate any significant effect on traffic patterns in this area of Missouri Heights. The estimated volume of traffic, either for construction or for the completed ADU will be negligent in nature compared to overall county road traffic. The Property is adjacent to and serviced by an existing driveway. An access easement is provided to Lot 1 along the existing driveway from County Road 102. Documents attached. SECTION 7-108 HAZARDS: Lot 2 does not create hazards identified in Section 7-209 and Section 7-210 of Article VII, or exacerbate existing hazards. There are no geological constraints associated with this property. The area for this unit has gentle slopes and grades. Attached are the Garfield County Maps for Soil Hazard Profile, Surficial Geology, Flood Plain Profile, Slope Hazard, and Wildfire Hazard. Documents attached SECTION7-109 FIRE PROTECTIONT This Property is within the El Jebel/Carbondale Fire District. Sub Fire station 8500 is also located less than 3 miles away .. SECTION 7-201 AGRICULTURAL LANDS Property is currently an agricultural operation. There will be no adverse effect from this application. We would request a waiver for this Section SECTION 7-202 WILDLIFE HABITAT No wildlife habitat will be impacted. Ranching operations will remain the same. We would request a waiver for this Section SECTION 7-203 PROTECTION OF WATERBODIES All irrigation ditches will not be effected by this application. We would request a waiver for this Section. SECTION 7-204 DRAINAGE AND EROSION This lot has a gentle slope and grade. Less than one acre of site disturbance is anticipated. We would ask for a waiver for this Section. SECTION 7-205 ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY This application will have no change to the Enviromnental Quality. We would ask for a waiver for this section. SECTION 7-206 WILDFIRE HAZARDS All surrounding fields are irrigated, and no fire hazards are present. We would ask for a waiver on this section. SECTION 7-207 NATURAL AND GEOLOGIC HAZARDS Application does not create hazards as identified in Section 7-209 and Section 7-210 of Article VII, or exacerbate existing hazards. There are no geological constraints associated with this property. Attached are the Garfield County Maps for Soil Hazard Profile, Surficial Geology, Flood Plain Profile, Slope Hazard, and Wildfire Hazard. Documents attached. SECTION 7-301 COMPATIBLE DESIGN Detached Garage and ADU will be compatible with existing house SECTION 7-302 OFF STREET PARKING AND LOADING Ample parking is available on this property-We would ask for a waiver on this section. SECTION 7-303 LANDSCAPING Landscaping already exists. We would ask for a waiver on this Section. SECTION 7-304 LIGHTING STANDARDS Lighting will be compliant per specifications noted SECTION 7-305 SNOW STORAGE Ample storage--waive SECTION 7-306 TRAIL AND WALKWAYS Does not apply DIVISION 4-SUBDIVISION STANDARDS Not applicable DIVISION 5-STANDARDS APPLICABLE CONSERVATION Not applicable DIVISION 6---ADDITIONAL STANDARDS FOR AGRICULTURAL AND ANIMALE USES Not applicable DIVISION 7 ADDITIONAL STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL USES A. Floor Area will be approximately 750 sq. ft. B. Ownership will not change C. Comply with Building Code D. Lot size is 5.25 acres E. Separate entrance to ADU F. One on lot SECTION 7-702 OFFICE/BUSINESS Not applicable SECTION 7-703 MANUFACTURED HOME PARK Not applicable SECTION 7-104 GROUP HOME FACILITIES Not applicable SECTION 7-705 TEMPORARY EMPLOYEE HOUSING Not applicable SECTION 7-706 TEMPORARY EMPLOYEE HOUSING Not applicable DIVISION 8 ADDITIONAL STANDARDS Not applicable DIVISION 9 COMMERCIAL USE Not applicable DIVISION 10 INDUSTRIAL USE Not applicable SECTION G-IMPACT ANALYSIS l. Adjacent Land Use: West property boundary is Stirling Ranch Property Owners Association. East property boundary is Kings Row Homeowners Association. North property boundary is agricultural. South Boundary is comprised of three home sites. 2. Site Features: We have no streams or lakes near the property. The possibility of flooding is very remote. 3. Soil Characteristics: A soil test is attached. 4. Geology and Hazard: Property is not in any natural hazard area. There are no manmade hazards located on property or in nearby areas. Geological maps attached. 5. Groundwater and Aquifer Recharge Areas: A separate waste water system will be constructed for this ADU in compliance with the requirements of the Land Use Code set forth in Section 7-106 of Article VII standards. There is currently a septic system on the property servicing the adjacent home. Further recharging of the aquifer will be accomplished by the irrigation (surface water) of the adjacent agricultural land (pastures). Since the property has gentle slopes and grades, and is not adjacent to any stream, there should not be any pollution of surface runoff. 6. Environmental Impacts: This application will disturb less than I acre ofland. There will be no impact on vegetation or wildlife. 7. Nuisance: There will be no impact. 8. Hours of Operation: Not applicable 7-701-ACCESORYDWELLING UNIT A. Maximum Floor Area: Floor area of ADU will be approximately 700 sq. ft. on 5.2 acres. B. Ownership Restriction: ADU will remain as a leasehold unit to Sloop/Lewis C. Compliance with Building Code: Building Permit will be obtained, and constmction will comply with the standards set forth in this Code and Building Code requirements. D. Minimum Lot Area: ADU will be constructed on a 5.2 acre lot which meets this requirement. E. Entrance to Dwelling Unit: This ADU will have its own private entrance. 7-101-Zone District 7-102-Comprehensive Plan 7-103-Compatibility Attachments LOT 13 20 21-- CDUN TY RDAJJ 1 Ot? U>T ,. -(@ (oi3) ®· I @ ; ! • Z.74 1<. • " i ...... i i @) Kings Row Lot# Beverly Misunas 1 1253 Kings Row Ave. Carbondale, CO 81623 Bryn & Jennife Peterson 1144 Kings Row Ave Carbondale, CO 81623 47 Adam & Tara Sahnow 48 1164 Kings Row Ave Carbondale, CO 8162 Kippet & Mary Wheeler 1228 Kings Row Ave 49 Carbondale, CO 81623 EXHIBIT ~ V cC.1Nt'TY 1l '/YlAf> I I I I I I I I I 2.5 tabbies" ml I I • >< §I I I I -I County Zone Districts, Vicinity of Town of Carbondale, Garfield County, CO I / ! ~ Gartleg-~~~'.~ r 0 0.3 0.6 1.2 ~it11'1Ro~ot11·t·l'"°9 \ •••c::==•••••-Miles :~ <7 '"· [ ]~~-.:,\~~\ I / ' I Legend CJ Public Lands 0Rural D Industrial D Commercial/General D Commercial/Limited CJ Planned Development D Planned Unit Development D Resource Lands CJ Residential/Mobile Home Park CJ Residential/Urban ~t-t bJ~t:-frope,,.-L\f · w I I j v 12 CJ ResidenUal/SubLl'ban D Public Airport • C_J Incorporated City or Town 0 Right-of-Way ......... - I i j ' • ZONE MAP SOUftCE: 1,(h!tfldC.Vlly ~-"'llfl'l••NZ-lhp:Otrlil•QOf1), BA.SEMA.P SOURCE: 1..u.10.&..1,uootr..........,..,..,,...,,J0..000""""_. :.c:11...,.Dt..,_.n. __ cn_(21M11t. J,G .... Clwtf'••W4~•11~•r.(2'007) 4, OWl:I CH"rtf"'-"11 Otp.1 .. l'tl\IWV.Ncl ,.-, .. 00111)). ~ USE OF GROUNDWATER PROHIBITED (Rifle UMTRASite) I 1 Ceetrned \e-ttee io 0e ~+-cut ~ appfCT.01 PUBLIC NOTICE TAKE NOTICE that Glen Sloop and Leslie Gaylord Lewis have applied to the Building and Planning Director, Garfield County, State of Colorado, to request an Administrative Approval for a detached garage with an ADU of approximately 700 sq. ft. on their 5.2 acre property situated in the County of Garfield, State of Colorado to wit: Legal Description: NEl/4 NE1/4, Section 29, Township 7 South, Range 87 West of the 61h P.M. Practical Description: 1802 County Road 102, approximately 3.5 miles northeast of Carbondale and Currently zoned Rural (R). Vicinity Map: VICINITY MAP ATIACHED Request: The Applicants request approval of a detached garage with an ADU of appromately 700 Sq. Ft. on their 5.2 acre property. All persons affected by this proposed Administrative request are invited to comment regarding the application. You may state your views by letter or you may call the Building and Planning Department at (970) 945-8212 regarding the application. The Director will give consideration to the comments of surrounding property owners, and others affected, in deciding whether to approve, approve with conditions or deny the request. The application may be reviewed at the office of the Building and Planning Department located at 108 8'h Street, Suite 401, Garfield County Plaza Building, Glenwood Springs, Colorado between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. The Director will make a decision on this application on ______ . Any comments to be considered must be received prior to that date. Building and Planning Department Garfield County SITE PLAN • \ I I I I 5~ 0 25 ~-~--: 1 irich = 50 ft. I I I I I I I >< i I I I 50 I ' I I ' >< I I OVERALL BOUNDARY Proposed Garage 36' x 28' 35.11' --t--~..._ _ _. I r-xl/ VJ ~ g tiJ ::: 0 • ":! .... ,,.._, __ 60.41' _ _, °i l:t! I "°l s; efPROPANE Existing House ._ 1802 Coun1y Rd 102 el ~ "" I q ~ ;---11--x _/ ___ x - I I I APPROX, SEP'l'lC « LJ;ACH FIELD f Fence -x---X _ (typical) x ---X ----CMP -x----1= REBAR EXEA!PTION LOT 2 5.228± acres & PLASTIC CAP PL.S. 31944 x x x BPEDESTAL FOUND STONE r ,,-MONUMENT SE CORNER OF NEl/4NEl/4 SEC. 29 _ _._-""""""""""""""'r ...... ~~-'""!':':-':"".'::r----ir-- - -ZO-r ACCESS ESMT. S88'51'45"W 222.84' DESCRIBED IN SITE PLAN EXEMPTION LOT 2, SLOOP SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION PLAT SITUATED IN THE NEl/ 4 NEl/ 4, SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 87 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M. COUNTY OF GARFIELD, STATE OF COLQRAJ2Q 1802 COUNTY ROAD 102 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: EXEMPTION WT 2 SLOOP SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION PLAT COUNTY OF GARFIELD, STATE OF COWRADO NOTES 1.) THIS SURVEY IS BASED ON THE SLOOP SUBDIVISION EXEJ\1.PTION PLAT. 2.) THIS DOES NOT REPRESENT A TITLE SEARCH BY THIS FIRM OR SURVEYOR. 3.) THE UNIT OF MEASUREMENT FOR THIS SURV'EY IS THE U.S. SURVEY FOOT. 36.11' > I I ·X----.J Proposed Garage 36' x 28' I r-x__ I -x-1 / I i x I I DETAIL SCALE: l 11 = 20' I Existing House 1802 County Rd 102 ---x I /'~, .. --L._ x ----x ----x -I ~ . -x-__ _ x--1-- r----,..---60.41 t ___ _. ·.·· .• < . -x "' I ;~-~x~~~x~~~ I I X··- SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE I, SCOTT R. BLACKARD, A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR IN THE STATE OF COLORADO, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED BY ME AND UNDER MY SUPERT/ISION AND THAT BOTH THE SURVEY AND PLAT ARE TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. ' . EXEMPTION LOT 2 JOB 1'10: 16010 DATE: 3/10/16 DWG. BY: SRB REV: 1 NOTICE; ACCORD/NC TO COLORAJ)() LAF YOU Jl!JST COJINENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY Jr/THIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVERED SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT, MAY AN ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT TN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF THE CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON. I ~ ____ BK Ji46.. JI ..EJLBO SLOOP SUBDNISION EXEMPTION PLAT SITUATED IN THE NEl/ 4 NEl/ 4, SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 87 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M. of ' -------------- COUN1Y OF GARFIELD, STATE OF COLORADO 1802 COUN1Y ROAD 102 1 PAGE D2/0 2 '\ --=1------+-----~119.83' LOG ; BARN ----+__ x 29' I Proposed Garage 36' x28' 36.11' -+------....._ __ __. ' r--x APPROX. SEPTIC & LEACH FIELD r(f/JJ WELL CONG. 0--BUNKER X----- dPROPANE X r---->----60.41' ---i x !::~£W~;:a::::iff,: f}fiszi,;-1'..,, ~.~ .. -c 2199<>' ... :v ! "'" aa ~--------· ,. "' .CEJ ·~ ,_j ~· / ~ ' I --\ _.,,.,;;..... ·=-~ ..... --~--~f 4.-~,--clJ -· ,, "' "'" D~ "' .,,- /~~ :i_~ ' ------::..._ ' ;--------. ' w~ ·-I~. EXEMPTION LOT 2 5.228± a;ares J ,] j I Ii I' I l'<<il'DSTIJNE (~~A5.~~'l. =~~-.~~~l"' S$1<"5t'•S·w 2~2 . .,·1 t~~~.Jscflf!~~ SITE PLAN EXEMPTION WT 2 SLOOP SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION PLAT SITUATED IN THE NEl/ 4 NEU 4, SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 87 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M. COUNTY OF GARFIEW, STATE OF COWRADO 1802 COUNTY ROAD 102 nlOl'EE1YD8SClW'1'/0li' -=· "'°"""""""""°'DZ>l!'llm ....... """""°"'""""""'"""""'"""""""' ~ , ...... ...._ .. ........,,,......, __ ~....,._ 1} ..... Dt'Jl<f..,,._.,.A-.S'IE4lll:!l1""""-""""""""" 1.l""'<JJlrt'(JJ'...........,,,,_.,,.._111""'""'-""""· SVRVEYOR'S~'t.S ti=~~,:::'~~~=~ ...,,_,."""',........,,......,,.....,......,"""'"""~"'""'IJIJJZfr°""" ...,,........Al<I> ......... .~ S/f,.,,,,. ,« l "" ~ " m,,,ffe ,l,'l/iV "''"·r-r' SITE PLAN """"""'""' swap smwMSIOlf &lWPnON P!A1' STIUAmD IN THE NEl/4 NE1/4, SECflON 29, TOWNSFm' 1 S0UIH, ~ 8711$SI' OF 11IB 61H P.M, COUNITOF Gl!JU1E'0 SllU1l OF COl.ORADO lBo::lCOflNTYROAD J02 JOB NO: 16010 D.!l.'l'E: 3/10/IG DWG. B'f. SRB REV: 1 of I 7-104 ADEQUATE WATER WELL INFORMATION J & M Pump Inc . 8611 County Road 117 Glenwood Springs CO 81601 Phone: 970-945-6159 DATE: March 15 , 2016 TO: Glen Sloop & Gay Lewis 1802 CR 102 Carbondale, CO 81623 RE: Well Tests Attn: Glen, Cell: 970-948-6159 Fax: 970 -945 -6159 Well Test J & M Pump Inc. performed a four hour well test at 1802 CR 102 on the original well drilled for this property. The following results were obtained: Well Depth: Water Level: Drawdown To: Sustained Yield Clarity: Recovery: Sample: Comments: 235 ' 191'4" measured from top of casing 205' 1" measured from top of casing 14.5 GPM via totalizing flow meter Clear 95% within 12 minutes Bacteria sent to MCHD Lab Test results indicate the well will service two dwellings For domestic water use. If you have any questions, please call Rick, 945-6159 J & M Pump Inc. Richard A Holub Lie. No 1196 Thank You! Laboratory Services Division 8100 Lowry Boulevard, Denver CO 80230-6928 US Mail: PO Box 17123, Denver co 80217 (303) 692-3090 fax (303) 344-9989 Lab ID No. SAMPLE SITE SAMPLE INFORMATION LESLIE LEWIS 1802 COUNTY RD 102 INTERIOR RESIDENCE KITClIEN Collected 3/30/2016 I 0:36:00AM Received 3/31/2016 12:32:00PM Reported ENV-2016003516 Collected By LL Matrix Drinking Water CUSTOMER COMMENTS Lewis Leslie 1802CR102 Carbondale Co 81623 Contact Name Lewis Leslie Contact Phone 970-963-3653 Test Name Escherichia coli PA Total coliforms PA Result E. coli NOT DETECTED Purpose Routine Chlorine residual Receive Temperature 14.1 Method Name SM 9223 B.2.b. Coliform ABSENT or less than one {<l), indicates SM 9223 B.2.b. a microbiologically safe sample If you have questions about this report, please call the Environmental Microbiology Lab at 303-692-3490 Payment Type If you have ordered Chemistry Tests: Results will be finalized in 2-3 weeks, For more information contact Water Lab at 303-692-3048. LSD Interent Address: http://www.cdphe.state.eo.us/lr/lrhom.htm Modification Date:4/l/2016 #203 GWS-11 07/93 OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER 818 Cantennial Bldg., 1313 Shennan St., Denver, Colorado 80203 (303} 856'l581 PRIOl'l TO COMPLE11NG FORM, SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE CHANGE IN OWNERSHIP/ADDRESS I LOCATION WELL PERMIT, LIVESTOCK TANK OR EROSION CONTROL DAM 1. NEWOWNER NAME(S) ........... G.;;>,.Y. .... 1.!e.W.i.f?. ... .IL ... (ilr?.Il .... S.J.QQ.P ...................................................... . Mailing Address .... J...8..0.2. .... C.R .. ..1..0..2.............. . ................................................................... . City, St Zip ....... Carb.and.ale., ..... co ............ 8..1.6.23. ............................................... . Phone (9.::w.. ) .9 . .6.3.--'.J.6.S.3. ........................................ .. 2. TlilS CHANGE IS FOR ONE OF Tl-1!0 FOLLOWING: G1 WELL PERMIT NUMBER.J) .. (l.:f.:Z.fa ......................................................... . D LIVESTOCK WATER TANK NUMBER .................................................... . D EROSION CONTROL DAM NUMBER ................................................... . ./ OCT 2 7 2000 3. WELL LOCATION: COUNTJ'. ........ c:i':'.':.~.~.~.'.".cJ:..................................... OWNER'S WELL DESIGNATION ...................................................... . ... J..!?..9.2: ... Q9.JJJl.tY. .... R9.f;!.d .. ..1..0..2.., ...... C.ar.bonda.l.e .. , ...... co. ........ 8 . .1..6.23. .......... " ........................................................................................ . (Addr<=) (City) (3tate) (Zip) .......... NE 1/4 of th• .... .NE ..... 1/4, Sec •..... .i.9 .... Twp ........ ..7...... D N. or Q S.~ Range ..... Jl.7.... DE. or Q W. ..6 .. t.b..... P.M. Distances from Section Unes ........... .7..~.g........ Ft from~ N. or D S. Line, ....... L~ .. Q ............. Ft. from \;;j E. or D W. Line. Subdivision ................................................. . Lot ...................... . Block....................... Filing (Unit) .................. .. 4. LIVESTOCK TANK OR EROSION CONTROL DAM LOCATION: COUNTY. ...................................................................... . I/ ................. 1 /4, Sec. ................. Twp............... D N. or D S., Range ................ D E. or D W. . ................ P.M. ~~~~~~~--1 5. The above listed owner(s) say(s) that he (they) own the structure described herein. The existing record is being amended for the following reason(s): Q Change in name of owner. D Change in mailing address. D Car rection of location. 6. I (we) have read the statements made herein, know the contents thereof, and state that they are true to my (our) Knowledge. [Pursuant to Section 24-4-104 (13)(a) C.R.S., the making of faise statements herein constitutes perjury iii the second degree and is punishable as a class 1 misdemeanor.] · Name/Trtle (New Owner) Please type or prtnt S~ure (Ne";g~r . . , /. ' . "7 ,...,Ou:, Gay Lewis & Glen Sloop . " V:;j'/ ~ .w~,~"' o FOR OFFICE USE ONLY \) State E'nginoor By Date !c/77-/cu ,, cc.~·,«:.'::.0 "'~ ,; 1:HANGE JN GWNERSH ~ AND/OR MA[Lll~G ADDRESS. /0 -31-Co Dato Court Case No. ______ Div. ___ Co. ___ WD ___ Basin. ___ MD ___ Lse __ _ l ..J WP,J-5-75 Application must be complete where applicable. Type or print in BLACK INK. No overstrikes or erasures unless initialed. .'.CEIVFO COLORADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES · 300 Columbine Bldg., 1845 Sherman St., De.nver, Colorado 80203 Y'.M I Ir IJ/7 PERMIT APPLICATION FORM IXI A PERMIT TO USE GROUND WATER 1)(1 A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A WELL FOR: ( ;\1 A PERMIT TO INSTALL A PUMP \',',\lER RE.SDURCtS ST1\TE ENG.!HEE;:i CDLO. I REPLACEMENT FOR NO.--------- I OTHER ______________ _ \YATER COURT CASE NO. __ _ --.. ----, .~· (1) APPLICANT· m'ailing address FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: 00 NOT WRITE IN THIS COLUMN NAME £. 5' Ts ie o·I "'5~s.s /I" /:; ,,C-e-n de,-Receipt No. '1 I . ..-, IC I C.:-' STREET c_:;-6 ;?_ C~tOt~ lf'oi / 0 z.. Basin Dist. CITY il.dt: bo_,, ,;!.z /c/ (! 17/0 /?/& c:J CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL • . (St.itt!) (Zip) TELEPHONE NO. (~021 'le 2-2? 7' c_ This well st1all be used in such a way as to cause no material injury to existing water rights. The ~-==-"···'-issuance of the permit does not assure the applicant Vi tOC'ATION OF PROPOSED WELL that no injury will occur to another vested water Gc1cf!__1 ·~/cl right or preclude another owner of a vested. water County right from seeking relief in a civil court action. rY £ Y... of the ;il,e %, Section ,;< 2' APPROVED FOR DOMESTIC USE, INCLUDING TRE __ , Rng __ j[l__ it! . IRRIGATION OF N0 1r OV:CH ONE ACRE OR HQ),(!\ Twp. 7S P.M. GARDENS AND LAWNS. 1N,S1 .f,W! 'J)J . (3) WATER USE AND WELL DATA Proposed maximum pumping rate (gpm} /'/ :') Average ann.ual amount of ground water 1.{ to be appropriated (acre-feet): Number of acres to be irrigated: I Proposed total depth (feet): /} /C/; ·AqLiifer ground water is to be obtained from: /(·1 !' "'I: ));. '.t: <' . Owner's well designation GROUND WATER TO BE USED FOR: I I HOUSEHOLD USE ONLY : no 1rr1gation {0) IXI DOMESTIC Ill I I INDUSTRIAL 151 I I LIVESTOCK 121 I I IRRIGATION (61 I I COMMERCIAL (4) I I MUNICIPAL (81 I I OTHER (91 . APPLICATION APPROVED DETAIL THE USE ON BACK IN (11) PERMIT N~MBER _8_8_27 6 (4) DRILLER DATE 1ssurn_EEB 08 1977 / i ·. /), 11 · /1-,0 EXPIRATl'QATE FEB,~ • Name f !--~/,~/--., /<'t't JirJ --... · --~ 7 .> '/,t.{,U,_, (f. UtW2 Street ___f2';;_;:;~ I ,L,L/U;J.c;_.)\u.JL'__ ___________ c {! '/-; /., (_~'i::_ . _ _ S'il::J~~ -~~-------·-- ''Y--. ,/I/,. i-L'~-,t.! .L-- ('d.11tq (/ifl) LIY _ ~ ____________ Telenhn11" f'J,1 0'! '/<11 t-·-1,,-/ ----_,_, -- Ii!' Nr1 -~ + i'i·: -\ ~- •H+ + -:--- ' L +--+ + ' -1- I I -i--·-+ -I "'"YE PRo:·,r~··::~:: .-i __ V·JELL ;J\(i 111·· ,H'.1 ,,r; . ·-;~!~;:,; iJ" i1;1];1-.111·d on 1111 1 d1<1<J!,T·1 !i;·l1;v;1 ;er:t101\, fltiG ;1c1 t!'ll !_c)r \hi> 'Nr;.'i iocci\11)11 1 MILE:, 5280 FECT i. I )" i- ' . ~ . + -t I -1 -+ -!-_ .... _j_ ' I + t I --~---+ + -\--1--!-+ 1 -\-. +--+--+ +--+ The scci\e of the di;-igrarn i~ 2 inches= 1 1nile Each scna!l square represt:nts .:10 acres. 1:1!1>. --~---~----8' '/!ATE'.R EOLHVALENTS TABLE (Round?.-d F19urns) 1\n a1 '" l\.nt cn,0e>r$ 1 \ll"!P. of land 1 foot deep ! i,:qb1i: root pi;r sec:onri lt.:fsl, . '149 g.:;!lons per rninu1c fgf)m) ; !nq\oll' ol G-•\'d: rl'qulrQ npuroxi11)a:r.ty 1 <3Crr.·foo1 of water r.~r yenr. 1 anc-too• . YJ.5()0 <:L1b1c feel , , ~!25.900 gallOJ'>. 1.0001n11n ,'".Jfl'OC'<( cQnt11nio1.t~ly for ant? dt1v pro<lur;(.!5 4.42 acre·lc1?1. 110) !,AND ON WHICH GROUND WATER WILL BE USED: Ow11er111:LvLS"L<"'. o( £,,..ssie F &4,-ler'" Lp:iol rle1c«111ion: J_LJL4!Li5t. s_e r:.__23_ --7;s __ )? 7 ~ ____ J~~Q--· l t h n1n __ ,t£(_-: /-J . ~ec. line (1HJ" ll\ or ~t1Utl1j _ _L+'('.. ___ 11 iro1n __ cCa:;~z::__ .. __ sec line (eist or west) LOT _____ SLOCK ____ ,.FILING 'f--- SUBDIVISION----------~ (7) TRACT ON WHICH WELL WILL Bl; LOCATED Owner No. of acres __ ~ 1 {c Will thii; be the only well ori 1.his tract? V£ :;_ I ------ (8) PROPOSt;D CASING PROGRA!yl Pl,1in Casing -. -_.,, _ ___,,___in. from _ __..r"-"--ft. to __LZi_ ft. Z _in. from-1Z:L_t1. to k·c ft. Perfonitcd cnsfng ______ in. from __ _ ft. to ____ ft. ______ ln. fron1 ____ fL to ft. (9) FOR REPLACEME~ff WELLS give distance nnd direction from old well and pltins for plugging ii: -------------- No. of acres:-·-·· 1-' (,. (11) Q_f-TAILED QJ;_SCRIPTJON of the t1Se of ground water. Household use and domestic wells must indicate type of disposal syslen1 to be uS 1Jd, c: -· (. ~ ; 1 ; ;,· J · . ./"--:_ ;J(/{J ---;d~L!JL'[:i J.._£.f:.(' ~(:II~ , _M;.i/<) t~· IC l:> ," -., I ______ j:'__2.J;______Jd;J.,...J.•.1... L ... "///? /':". 'S ;-;,-t __Jj;:_g_,___ul '":;,__,,_8,__/LLILl'~t!'-"-'-------------- (12) QJJ:!.EB__lf\lfil!;_fLBIGHTS ""ti on this l;1nd. including well<_ Give RO[Jistrntion anrl Weter CoLrl Caso Numbers. TypL· (\( l'ig!1t 't-',:: __ $L12if,_'1_r~~~- Used lor (purpose) ---L=--~ r 111.~--'<'--' _c(~"'-''-"-'-"'--' Ocscriptivn of iand on vvhic.h u~~d ,/ r:_ ,). 17 .,., r '11 ' a1 rl'J/ ~ -----'' l-1-LE.1_-'-+-~--L!if:. .• ~\ _liL! __ J •. L2~.1 f .f!) 'I • I -~··· --~--·· -------·-------·---~-·-·-- ( 13) THE APPLICANT(S) STATE(S) THAT THE INFOP.MAT!Oi'J SET FORTH HEREON IS TRUE TO Hff r"EST OF HIS KNOWLEDGE. '.__/-I J ,·,4.--/ / .~ ./ /;-'_/·'/ / -~ /;c;;-7 ,-.. f'.a~<'/ __ !2§.$::2<<' T U-v~ dµk<a< c-L_//.--?.;'47 ,-s_//.,<o;>c2uc:L/t C£'k..;<-y_.'1 .NA TUR£ OF{.fPPL ICANTIS! · // / 7-105-WASTE WATER ATTACHMENTS ~ m >< :c • ii =i r--·· ! i ! i i i i i f -c· ,.., .. Septic System Constraints, Garfield County, Colorado : ' --==----""· 11ncn eroi.aJ: 3 . .:. mne: &0tlC;CQ.l"(llC-0W,Tu.Nfl.AC"9CI:. ~""-"'""'_"".-.,.. ... """""-;u.. ........ ~ ...... i.... _ _....._.,_...,_....."'_~c-.._. r-nloY-'C. t_~1~~~: w-tr4c Septic System Constraints Hi;h~Tablo S/owl'tllt:R:ro Solution Evapaffo MmrQI: Erlcn1 of Gcolog!c Sludy ! 1 i ! l i ! i i i "! i J ,_i_, UA.P21 ~ j '.e!.!.r-- ~ J l Colorado . -I --i::::=·----.CMB::. 1 inch eqUtJJ:s 3.4 mile:: "°'Tl:t.V:.TC•CO"°'TU.f,ITt.'-O~C 11~"-.,,."""''"uo~f.Wf'. ~~Q,,.f•.t~o ............. 0'.,.......,._"'-1111.1.~UW119'0110t.IW-C-.b;IC :;.,.,..._(1111'_.n:, .. _ Garfield County . ---,=:;~~- ,~~ .. ,.,.;:: ... tt~''-'""'01 -•· • .;:,s~M:ICr<i.'re Sol<Lion Evaporite Minerals Extent of Geologic Study ~c':Sy~leM ~-op .... 7-107-ADEQUATE ACCESS TRAFFIC 102 ROAD ATTACHMENTS 231 Fi rst Street 942 117 Four M i le Rd 2077 244 Fravert Reservoir Rd 317 352 Garfield Countv A i rport 1139 312 Garfield Creek Rd 211 226 Grass Valley Rd 325 221 Green Ln 392 261 Groff Ln 334 327 Halls Gulch 212 109 Hardwick Bridge Rd 2031 236 Harness Ln 181 237 Harvey Gap Rd 908 333 Hunter Mesa Rd 220 261A Ingersoll Ln 137 336 Jenki ns Cutoff 253 259 Jewell Ln 309 24 2 JQSRd 84 202 Ki mball Creek Rd 14 119 Kindall Rd 17 316 Knuckles Creek Rd 49 162 La Cas ita Rd 87 217 Little Box Canyon Rd 210 120 Lookout Mountai n Rd 40 243 Ma i n Elk Rd 174 315 Mamm Creek Rd 1300 123 Marion Cemetry Rd 19 324 Maxfi eld Rd 195 133 Mel Rav Rd 1577 257 Mesa Dr 198 219 Middle Rifle Creek 256 262 Mid-Valley Ln 336 210 Mile Pond Rd 820 227 Miller Ln 931 102 Missouri Heights ..:::. = : 583 - ~ 132 Mit chell Creek Rd 197 301 Morrisania Mesa Rd 600 118 Mt Sopri s Ranch Rd 132 129 No Name Ln 144 247 North Cutoff Rd 100 200 North Dry Fork Rd 71 293 North Graham Rd 1117 251 North Hasse Ln 126 456 Odin Dr 140 110 Old Dump Rd 447 154 Old Highway 82 2564 170 Panorama Dr 325 451 Panoramic Dr 129 215 Parachute Creek Rd 919 214 Peach Valley Rd 758 223 Peterson Ln 991 DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND ROAD-SHARING AGREEMENT THIS DECLARATION OF COVENANTS and ROAD-SHARING AGREEMENT is made this day of , 2011, by Glen A. Sloop/Leslie G. Lewis (hereinafter referred to as "Declarant"), owner of the real property described below which property is located in Garfield County, Colorado: RECITALS WHEREAS, Declarant is the sole owner of certain property to be known as the Sloop/Lewis Subdivision Exemption, located in Garfield County, Colorado, and which is more particularly described in Exhibit A and depicted in Exhibit B, both attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, consisting of approximately 40.57 acres (hereinafter referred to as the "Property"); and WHEREAS, Declarant intends to divide the Property into two lots, identified as Lot 1 and Lot 2, as approximately depicted on the proposed plat map attached as Exhibit B;and WHEREAS, Declarant intends that Lot 1 and Lot 2 will share a common Access Road from Garfield County Road 102 as depicted on Exhibit B attached hereto and in the preceding paragraph; and WHEREAS, Declarant further intends that Lot 1 and Lot 2 may also use this same common Access Road to provide access for Emergency and Fire Services vehicles to either Lot and to provide for the installation of any future utilities services to either or both of the lots; and WHEREAS, Declarant desires to establish the relative rights and obligations of the owners of Lot 1 and Lot 2 concerning the shared use of the common Access Road and to create easements for the existence, operation, repair and replacement of the same, and for future installation, operation, maintenance and repair of utilities with the same; NOW THEREFORE, Declarant hereby declares that the Lot 1 and Lot 2 shall be held, sold and conveyed subject to the following restrictions, covenants and conditions, which are for the purpose of protecting the value and desirability of the Property, and which shall run with the Lot 1 and Lot 2 and be binding upon all parties having any right, title or interest in either of those Lots, or any part thereof, their heirs, successors and assigns, and shall inure to the benefit of each owner thereof. 1. Grant of Easement for Access Road. The owner of Lot 1 shall have a perpetual non-exclusive easement forty feet in width, and depicted in Exhibit B, over and across an existing un-paved road on Lot 2 for ingress and egress between County Road 102 and Lot 1 ("Access Road"). The Access Road shall exist within the easement therefore and shall extend from the point at which it intersects County Road 102 to the point at which it intersects the western boundary of Lot 2. To the extent that such road extends east of the point on Exhibit B labeled Lot 1, it shall thereafter be solely owned by the owner of Lot 1 and its improvement, maintenance, repair shall be the sole responsibility of the owner of Lot 1 and its use may be restricted as determined solely by the owner of Lot 1. 2. Shared Responsibility for Maintenance and Costs of Access Road. Responsibility for improvement, maintenance and repair of the Access Road shall be shared mutually by the owners of Lot 1 and Lot 2 as set forth below: a. The owners of Lot 1 and Lot 2 shall share all costs for improvement, maintenance, and repair of the Access Road equally. b. Before any such work is commenced, the owners of Lot 1 and Lot 2 shall agree upon plans and specifications for such work and the individual or entity that will perform the work. The owners of Lot 1 and Lot 2 may also agree upon a maximum cost for such work. The parties may agree upon an alternative distribution of costs, but any such agreement shall be unenforceable unless it is in writing signed by the owners of Lot 1 and 2. c. In the event that the owners of Lot 1 and Lot 2 are unable to agree upon the elements set forth in subparagraph a. above, either individual owner may undertake improvements to the Access Road and shall be solely responsible for the costs thereof, except that neither owner may cause the road to be paved without the written consent of the other. d. No lot owner shall be obligated to contribute toward road improvement, maintenance or repair until such time as that Lot owner commences the construction of a residence on his or her Lot. At such time, however, such Lot owner shall be responsible for reimbursing the other Lot owner for one half of all documented costs of improvements, maintenance and repairs as the owner may have previously incurred. 3. Grant of Easement for Utilities. The owner of Lot 1 shall also have a perpetual non-exclusive easement forty feet in width over and across Lot 2 (as depicted on Exhibit B) for the purposes of installation, operation, use, maintenance, repair and replacement of any utilities. This easement may be used for this purpose so long as the utilities remain buried beneath the Access Road, so long as their construction and maintenance does not unreasonably interfere with the use of said Access Road by the owner of Lot 2 for an unreasonable amount of time, and so long as their installation and maintenance is undertaken in compliance with all applicable county, state and federal laws as may now exist or may in the future govern such construction. For the purposes of this easement, the term "utilities" shall be interpreted broadly, and shall non-exclusively include water, telephone, cable, electricity, internet, and other similar connections to services commonly defined as "utilities". Auy Lot owner installing, maintaining or repairing utilities shall be solely responsible after the completion of said work for the reconstruction and restoration of the Access Road to substantially the same condition as before said work was performed. 4. Emergency Access Easement. A general easement is hereby granted to all police, sheriff, fire protection, ambulance, and other similar emergency agencies or persons to enter upon and use the Access Road in the proper functioning of their duties in their capacities for the benefit or either or both of Lot I and Lot 2. 5. Covenants to run. The covenants, conditions and restrictions contained herein shall run with Lot I and Lot 2 and shall bind the owners thereof, their successors and assigns. 6. Enforcement. This document may be enforced by either Lot owner or any governmental agency having jurisdiction over the matter, by an action for damages or for injunctive relief to restrain or mandate any action required by this document. Colorado law shall govern the interpretation of this document. Unless the parties to any dispute arising with regard to this document agree to an alternate form of dispute resolution, venue for any dispute arising with regard to this document shall be in the courts of Garfield County, Colorado. The prevailing party in any legal action to enforce this document shall be entitled to reasonable attorney's fees and costs. 7. Amendments. This document shall be recorded in the real estate records of Garfield County, Colorado. This document may be amended only by the unanimous written consent of the owners of Lot I and Lot 2. No amendment shall be effective until an instrument setting forth such amendment, signed by both Lot's owners, is recorded in the re&! estate records of Garfield County, Colorado. 8. Severability. Should a Court of competent jurisdiction declare any provision of this document invalid or unenforceable, such decision shall not affect that validity of any other provisions, which shall remain in full force and effect. DATED: ----------' 2011 DECLARANTS: Glen A. Sloop Leslie G. Lewis STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. COUNTY OF GARFIELD ) The foregoing Declaration was subscribed and sworn to before me this __ day of , 2011, by Glen A. Sloop WITNESS my hand and official seal. My commission expires: Notary Public STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. COUNTY OF GARFIELD ) The foregoing Declaration was subscribed and sworn to before me this __ day Of , 2011, by Leslie G. Lewis. WITNESS my hand and official seal. My commission expires: Notary Public 01/15/2011 10:05 9705253150 -.\ -·· ~, . .--- SEXTON SURVEY .. _ ........ ·' _ ....... ··" . APPROX. SEPTIC & LEACH F/EU) Cl) 0 ~ " -- Ill ti.. Cl) C;} l/i--.---~~~~--.,-----~--~--~~C~U~Pll~ I ~ I ~ ~ I . ~ / IRRIGATION! I I i DITCH j I I' i EXEMPTION LOT 2 j -.. ---...... i --... .. _ ,. --. . ··-.. , .. · ( I ~ / : I I . S . 228 ± acres ~i C..:i: ~I ti'). "' ' · 1 !RJUCATJON -.. DITCH ·--.. .. ....___ ""'· ......... I I ; i I t' ~---.. -~'fi~~ATlO~ .. --·-" { ! ...... ..~ ";----·· , I r I : / 1 I// . __ ._J .-...··.---. ..-: .. -...... , ___ .. ~·· ~ .. ----·· : I I : _. I I i , I I . / i -Q t'-.:1 ~ ... ~ ~ · PEDES'l'AJ .. PAG E 02/02 ) l /) ' ', \. ~ , \ I ' I I \ , 11 \\ \) ,, \) I •' ( [ I I '1 '') ''\ I r-1 ' ( \\ ( ., I ' \ ... \ \ I) I ) I ) I 1 , I I \ " I ' . ,...., . .... \ ,') ., I l ' ' ' \ I I I I ' \ I 1,. I • •' 1 !IBIHXa I ... ·' " I ,I ,,_ I ) l,l ' 1 l I) \ t\ \ ) ' I \'I \ 'I) I I ~ \ \ \ '. \ • ) 1. -.. ' ' ) ') '· \ / I I ,,1 ; \ ,, \I \ /.,.·-'~I \ l I) \' " "\ l / I \ \ ·) c ,,, .-=;' 7 ' ( I <. I '·'' ( I I " -- 05/2312011 11: 40 9705253150 SE><TON SURVEV !'il&OLJ)ffiE."!§. AND-1JXJ1,1TY EJlS)£MfilJLJJ~7.'l!JlJ. AN ACCESS AND UTJf,lTY EASEMENT .BEING 40.00 F.EET IN WIDTH SITUATED lN THE NE!l,NE't, OP SEC'T!ON 29, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 87 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M .. BEING MO.RE PARTICULARLY' DltSCRIBltD AS FOLLOWS: JJEG.INN!NG AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID N£1!1NE'k THftNCE soo•11'46"E 276,18 FEET TO THE '!'RUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE S85"S3'Z7"W 219.90 FE_li)T, TH8NCE S00"00'00"W 40. IZ FEET; THENCE N85"33'27" E 220.04 FEET; THENCE N00"11'16"W 40.11 FEET TO THE Tl<UE POINT OF BEG1NN!NG. $.AID EASEMENT CONTAINS B,7.99± SQUARE FEET AS DESCfl.fBED COUNTY OF GARFIELD STAT.Ir OP COLORADO PAGE 01/01 7-207-NATURAL AND GEOLOGICAL HAZARDS ATTACHMENTS ~ '---·•-.. _.,_.,_,,_,,_u_••-., ••-•••h•u; I / I I I I I I I .. -··-"-··-··-··-~-·---·-··-··-··-··-··-··-··-··-··-"-··-:·-·---··-··-·-.. -.. -....... ·-··-.. ···-··-.. ···-··-··-.. i 2:-, 1 c t ' il I;•! ul t!'' ~ ·' 'l ~l / ,@f / ··--· I ) ... ! . ... .... ~ !~ ! ,.. ~ j,j !!. .!I ~ I!! ~ :i ~ ~ "' 'O 0 UJ ~ 0 ~ 0 :i .ll March 28, 2016 Glen Sloop 1802 County road 102 Carbondale, Colorado 81623 (S!cgwis@29l.i;grriJ Job No.116 074A Subject: Subsoil Study for Foundation Design, Proposed Garage with Residential Unit, 1802 County Road 102, Garfield County, Colorado Dear Mr. Sloop: As requested, Hepworth-Pawlak Oeotechnical, Inc. performed a subsoil study for design of foundations at the subject site. The study was conducted in accordance with our agreement for geotechnical engineering services to you dated March 21, 2016. The data obtained and our recommendations based on the proposed construction and subsurface conditions encountered are presented in this report. Proposed Construction: The proposed structure will consist of a residential apartment above a garage. The building will be located on the site as shown on Figure 1. Garage floor will be slab-on-grade. Cut depths are expected to range between about 3 to 4 feet. Foundation loadings for this type of construction are assumed to be relatively light and typical of the proposed type of construction. If building conditions or foundation loadings are significantly different from those described above, we should be notified to re-evaluate the recommendations presented in this report. Site Conditions: The building site is located to the rear of the existing residence and on a five acre parcel along the west side of County Road I 02. Vegetation consists of sparse grass and weeds. The property is located on a rolling upland mesa on the north side of Roaring Fork Valley. The ground surface slopes slightly to moderately down to the south. Subsurface Conditions: The subsurface conditions at the site were evaluated by excavating two exploratory pits at the approximate locations shown on Figure I. The logs of the pits are presented on Figure 2. The subsoils encountered, below about one foot of topsoil, consist of sandy silty clay overlying gravel and clay in Pit l and silty sandy gravel with cobbles and basalt boulders in Pit 2. Results of swell-consolidation testing performed on relatively undisturbed samples of sandy clay, presented on Figures 3 and 4, indicate low compressibility under existing moisture conditions and light loading -2- and moderate compressibility under increased loading and wetting. The sample from Pit 2 showed a low collapse potential (settlement under constant load} when wetted. Results of a gradation analysis performed on a sample of clayey sandy gravel with cobbles (minus 5 inch fraction) obtained from the site are presented on Figure 5. No free water was observed in the pits at the time of excavation and the soils were moist. Foundation Recommendations: Considering the subsoil conditions encountered in the exploratory pits and the nature of the proposed construction, we recommend spread footings placed on the undisturbed natural soil designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of 1,500 psf for support of the proposed building. The upper clay soils tend to compress after wetting and there could be some post-construction foundation settlement. Footings should be a minimum width of 18 inches for continuous walls and 2 feet for columns. Loose and disturbed soils encountered at the foundation bearing level within the excavation should be removed and the footing bearing level extended down to the undisturbed natural soils. Exterior footings should be provided with adequate cover above their bearing elevations for frost protection. Placement of footings at least 36 inches below the exterior grade is typically used in this area. Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span local anomalies such as by assuming an unsupported length of at least 10 feet Foundation walls acting as retaining structures (if any) should be designed to resist a lateral earth pressure based on an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 50 pcf for the on-site soil as backfill. A representative of the geotechnical engineer should observe all footing excavations prior to concrete placement to evaluate bearing conditions. Floor Slabs: The natural on-site soils, exclusive of topsoil, are suitable to support lightly loaded slab-on-grade construction. To reduce the effects of some differential movement, floor slabs should be separated from all bearing walls and columns with expansion joints which allow unrestrained vertical movement. Floor slab control joints should be used to reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking. The requirements for joint spacing and slab reinforcement should be established by the designer based on experience and the intended slab use. A minimum 4 inch layer of free-draining gravel should be placed beneath basement level slabs to facilitate drainage. This material should consist of minus 2 inch aggregate with less than 50% passing the No. 4 sieve and less than 2% passing the No. 200sieve. All fill materials for support of floor slabs should be compacted to at least 95% of maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Required fill can consist of the on-site soils devoid of vegetation, topsoil and oversized rock. Underdrain System: It is our understanding the proposed garage finished floor elevation will be at or above the surrounding natural grade. Therefore, a foundation drain system is not required or recommended. It has been our experience in the area that local perched groundwater can develop during times of heavy precipitation or seasonal runoff. Frozen ground during spring runoff can also create a perched condition. We recommend below- grade construction, such as retaining walls (if any) be protected from wetting and hydrostatic pressure buildup by an underdrain and wall drain system. Job No.116 074A -3 - If the finished floor elevation of the proposed structure has a floor level more than 2 feet below the surrounding grade, we should be contacted to provide recommendations for an underdrain system. All earth retaining structures should be proper! y drained. Surface Drainage: The following drainage precautions should be observed during construction and maintained at all times after the building has been completed: 1) Inundation of the foundation excavations and underslab areas should be avoided during construction. 2) Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density in pavement and slab areas and to at least 90% of tbe maximum standard Proctor density in landscape areas. Free-draining wall backfill (if any) should be capped with about 2 feet of the on-site, finer graded soils to reduce surface water infiltration. 3) The _ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions. We recommend a minimum slope of 12 inches in the first 10 feet in unpaved areas and a minimum slope of 3 inches in the first 10 feet in pavement and walkway areas. A swale may be needed uphill to direct surface runoff around the building. 4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill. Limitations: This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no warranty either express or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the exploratory pits excavated at the locations indicated on Figure 1 and to the depths shown on Figure 2, the proposed type of construction, and our experience in the area. Our services do not include determining the presence, prevention or possibility of mold or other biological contaminants (MOBC) developing in the future. If the client is concerned about MOBC, then a professional in this special field of practice should be consulted. Our findings include interpolation and extrapolation of the subsurface conditions identified at the exploratory pits and variations in the subsurface conditions may not become evident until excavation is performed. If conditions encountered during construction appear different from those described in this report, we should be notified at once so re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes. We are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. As the project evolves, we should provide continued consultation and field services during construction to review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations, and to verify that the recommendations have been appropriately interpreted. Significant design changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommendations presented herein. We recommend on-site observation of excavations and foundation Job No.116 074A -4- bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a representative of the geotechnical engineer. If you have any questions or if we may be of further assistance, please let us know. Respectfully Submitted, Louis Eller Reviewed by: Job No.116 074A APPROXIMATE SCALE 1n = 401 --,) -- ACCESS EASEMENT • f:;!> I~ GRAVEL DRIVE ...... -~~ -OWELL ... I I I I PIT 1 1111 PROPOSED GARAGE "' 0 ~ Cl (§ a: I 1111 PIT2 r-----, r-, ~ z I ::> I i.. ___ J I 0 (.) L EXISTING RESIDENCE I • ---I I --, I I .__ .J --- .. .. .. 116074A G~&i:ed1 LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY PITS Figure 1 HRworth-l'GWlalc Geotedmlcd ., Q) LL ~ Q) Cl 0 5 10 LEGEND: PIT 1 WCo19.7 00098 -200"93 PIT2 WC~11.5 0Dc92 I +4=64 -.J .200~10 TOPSOIL; organic sandy silt and clay, firm, moist, dark brown CLAY (CL); sandy, silty, stiff, slightly moist, reddish brown. 0 5 10 GRAVEL AND CLAY (GC..CL); sandy, scattered cobbles and boulders, very dense/very stiff, moist, reddish brown, angular basalt rock. NOTES: GRAVEL (GM); with cobbles and boulders, sandy, silty, dense, slightly moist, light brown, calcareous, angular basalt rock. 2" Diameter hand driven liner sample. Disturbed bulk sample. 1. Exploratory pits were excavated on March 21, 2016 with a Komatsu PC138 trackhoe. 2. locations of exploratory pits were measured approximately by pacing from features shown on the site plan provided. 3. Elevations of exploratory pits were not measured and the logs of exploratory pits are drawn to depth. 4. The exploratory pit locations should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. 5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory pit logs represent the approximate boundaries between material types and transitions may be gradual. 6. No free water was encountered In the pits at the time of excavating. Fluctuation in water level may occur with time. 7. Laboratory Testing Results: WC = Water Content (%) DD = Dry Density (pct) +4 = Percent retained on the No. 4 sieve -200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve ., if ' i Cl 116074A LOGS OF EXPLORATORY PITS Figure 2 Moisture Content ~ 19.7 percent Ory Density = 98 pcf Sample of: Slightly Sandy Silty Clay From: Pit 1 al 2~ Feel 0 * c--.. c: 1 0 \ !'-. u; "' a! 0. 2 ' 8 \ \ () 3 ~ No movement upon welling 0.1 1.0 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE . ks! 116 074A ~~ed1 SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Figure 3 H-worlh-Powlak Geolechnlcal Moisture Content = 11.5 percent Dty Density ~ 92 pol Sample of: Sandy Silty Clay From: Pit 2 at 2 Feet 0 r--r-r-. I'- 1 ""~ Compression ---~ I) upon 2 / ... ~ wetting '/11. c., .-c 0 lli 3 I!! c. \ E 0 u 4 5 \ \ 6 7 \ \ ' 8 9 :\ 10 \ 11 0.1 1.0 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE -ks! 116074A G~ech SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Figure 4 H-worth-Powtd< Gootochnk:al HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAl, INC. TABLE 1 Job No. 116 074A SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS SAMPl.E LOCATION l/AlURAL NATURAL GRADATION PERCENT ATIERBERG LIMITS UNCOii FINED MOISTURE DRY GRAVEL SAND PASSING LIQUID PlASTIC CDMPRf5SlllE PIT DEPTH CONTENT DENSITY NO. 200 UMIT INDEX STRENGTH SOIL TYPE (%) (%) SIEVE lit\ 1%1 {nrf\ 1%\ 1%1 lo<:F\ 1 2 112 19.7 98 93 Slightly Sandy Silty Clay 2 2 11.5 92 Sandy Silty Clay 4 to 5 64 26 10 Slightly Clayey Sandy Gravel with Cobbles 0 l.tJ :z ~ "' l:t: I-rn 0 f5 0.. I HVOROMEIEA ANALYSIS I SEVE~LYSIS 10 20 30 Ml 50 60 70 60 90 100 90 80 70 60 50 ~ 40 30 20 10 001 .002 .005 009 019 037 074 150 0 .300 600 118 2 36 4.75 9.5 19.0 37.5 76.2 152 203 12.5 127 OIAMEIER OF PARTICLES IN MIWMETERS , .. GRAVEL 64 % SAND 26 % SILT AND CLAY 10 % LIQUID LIMIT PLASTICITY INDEX % SAMPLE OF: Slightly Clayey Sandy Gravel with Cobbles FROM: Pit 2 at 4 to 5 Feet Cl z Iii "' < 0.. I-m 0 f5 0.. 116 074A C~ech GRADATION TEST RESULTS Figure 5 Heowarth-Pawl Geoloc:hnlcal STATE OF COLORADO COLORADO GEOLOGICAL SURVEY--serving th e p eople of Colorado Departmen t of Natural Re sou rces 13 13 Sherman Street, Room 715 Denver, CO 80203 Ph one : (303) 866-2611 Fax: (303) 866-2461 April 13, 2 011 Mr. Gl enn Hartmann Garfield County Planning D e partment I 08 81h Street Glen wood Springs, CO 81601 Re: S loop -Gaylord Exemption, CGS GA-1 1-0006_1 DEPART MENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Joh n Hickenloop er Governor Michae l King Executive Director Vincent Matthews Dear Mr. Haiimann: Di visi on Di rector and State Geo logi st Thank y ou for submittin g the a bove referen ced proposal. The propos al is to s ubdi vi de 40.5 acres into two sin g le- fami ly lots. L ot 2 , w ith an ex isting home, wi ll be about 5 acres in size. Lot 1, with numero us ex isti ng accessory stru ctures will be about 35 acres. Both lot s wi ll be served by well and septic. The site is located n ortheast of Catherine along County Road 102. Se veral drainages and irrigati on ditch es cross the s ite. Most of the site is fairly level but s teep ar eas are prese nt along drainag es , es pecially in the southwest quarter of the site. ln thi s area, the drainage was well vegetated but appeared to contain "loose" se diment deposits. No geologic or geotechnical inform atio n was submitted with the application. According to geo logi c maps, th e site is underlain by sh eetwash, colluv ium and collapse debris. Collapse debris depos its are m oderatel y to severel y deformed bedrock and overl y ing undeformed to m od erately deformed surficial depos its. Th e debri s was formed in response to differential vertical collapse or regional s ubs id ence resulting from dissoluti on of underlying thi ck bed s of evaporates. As a res ult, land s lides, d epressions, and sinkholes .can found in the general area. Distinct subs idence features were n ot evident near exi sting stru ctures but s uch risks are possible. Soil constraints su ch as collapsible soil, expan s ive so il , and corrosive soil s may al so be present. According to soil s urv ey data, when di sturbed, soil s in steeper areas are hi ghl y erodibl e. In summary, Lot 1 has ample good building areas to accommodate a single-family home and accessory structures. It would be prudent t o avoid building or di sturbing soil in or n ear drainages. A s ite-specific soil s and foundation investigation s hould be done before buildings are constructed. Even though th e ri sk appears to be low, th e inves tigation will also help mitigate subs idence risks. Please contact me if you have an y questions or concerns. I can be r eached at 30 3.866.2018 or by email at karen . berry@sta te. co. us. Sincerely, Karen A. Berry Geolog ical Engineer, PG , AlCP, C PESC-SWQ