The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1.0 ApplicationEastbank Equine Hospital Garfield County Application for Administrative Review Submitted by: BALCOMB & GREEN, P.C. 818 Colorado Avenue Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Ph: (970) 945-6546 www.balcombgreen.com TABLE OF CONTENTS Garfield County Application for Administrative Review Eastbank Equine Hospital 4-203.B General Application Materials A. Application Form B. Payment Agreement Form C. Pre-Application Conference Summary D. Ownership Documentation – Vesting Deeds and Title Commitment E. Statement of Authority for Eastbank, LLC F. Names and Addresses of property owners within 200 feet and Mineral Owner G. Property Description 4-203.C Vicinity Map 4-203.D Site Plan 4-203.E Grading and Drainage Plan 4-203.F Landscaping Plan 4-203.G Impact Analysis 4-203.L Traffic Study 4-203.M Water Supply and Distribution Plan 4-203.N Wastewater Management and Treatment Plan - Response to Standards 0 0 0 ce Garfield County Community Development Department 108 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 (970) 945-8212 www.garfield-county.com TYi& ~APPIJeA'llctN Iii Administrative Review a Limited Impact Review a Major Impact Review a Amendments to an Approved LUCP OUR OM1R OsuP a Minor Temporary Housing Facility a Vacation of a County Road/Public ROW a Location and Extent Review a Comprehensive Plan Amendmen~ a Pipeline Development ILAN D USE CHAN 1GE PERMl ili AP ·PLICATIO N FOR,M a Development in 100-Year Floodplain a Development in 100-Year Floodplain Variance a Code Text Amendment a Rezoning D Zone DistrictO PUD D PUD Amendment a Administrative Interpretation a Appeal of Administrative Interpretation a Areas and Activities of State Interest a Accommodation Pursuant to Fair Housing Act a Variance a Time Extension {also check type of original application) INVOLViEB PA'.R~l"I E S Owner I Applicant Name: Eastbank, LLC Phone: { 970 ) 925-9046 Mailing Address: 710 E. Durant Avenue, W-6 City: Aspen State: CO Zip Code: 81611 E-mail: aellis@dunrene.com Representative (Authorization Required) Name: Chad J. Lee, Esq. Phone: { 970 )945-6546 Mailing Address: Balcomb & Green, P.C., 818 Colorado Avenue City: Glenwood Springs State: CO Zip Code: 81601 E-mail: clee@balcombgreen.com ~RC>~ECJ ttl~M E AND lllOCATION Project Name: Eastbank Equ_ine Hospital (Veterinary Clinic) Assessor's Parcel Number: 2185 -354 -15 -002 ------------ Physical/Street Address: 3927 County Road 154 Legal Description: See attached Title Commitment Zone District: Rural Property Size (acres): 16.983 O~ 0 0 PRO:JE CT bESCRIPTION Existing Use: Light Industrial with approved Special Use Permit and pre-existing uses, vacant and agricultural ProposedUse(komUseThb~3~~:_E_q_~_~_H_o_s_~_~_w_e_~_ri_~-~~a-~-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~- Description of Project: Applicant is requesting a permit to construct a new building of approximately 4,000 square feet to house an equine hospital/veterina~ clinic on an approximate 2+ acres of a larger 16.983 acre parcel. RE'QUEST FOR WAIVERS Submission Requirements a The Applicant requesting a Waiver of Submission Requirements per Section 4-202. List: Section: Section: Section: Section: Waiver of Standards a The Applicant is requesting a Waiver of Standards per Section 4-118. List: Section: Section: Section: Section: statements above and have provided the required attached information which is rate to the best of my knowledge. File Number: ____ -___ _ Fee Paid:$ ------------------------~ 0 .Q ', 0 PAYMENT AGREEMENT FORM GARFIELD COUNTY ("COUNTY") and Property Owner ("APPLICANT") Eastbank, LLC _____________________________ agree as follows: 1. The Applicant has submitted to the County an a~plication for the following Project: __ _ Eastbank Equine Hospital (Veterinary Clinic) 2. The Applicant understands and agrees that Garfield County Resolution No. 2014-60, as amended, establishes a fee schedule for each type application, and the guidelines for the administration of the fee structure. 3. The Applicant and the County agree that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to ascertain the full extent of the costs involved in processing the application. The Applicant agrees to make payment of the Base Fee, established for the Project, and to thereafter permit additional costs to be billed to the Applicant. The Applicant agrees to make additional payments upon notification by the County, when they are necessary, as costs are incurred. 4. The Base Fee shall be in addition to and exclusive of any cost for publication or cost of consulting service determined necessary by the Board of County Commissioners for the consideration of an application or additional County staff time or expense not covered by the Base Fee. If actual recorded costs exceed the initial Base Fee, the Applicant shall pay additional billings to the County to reimburse the County for the processing of the Project. The Applicant acknowledges that all billing shall be paid prior to the final consideration by the County of any Land Use Change or Division of Land. I hereby agree to pay all fees related to this application: Billing Contact Person:_A_u_d_re_y_E_ll_is _________ Phone: ( 970 ) 925-9046 Billing Contact Address: 710 E. Durant Avenue, W-6 City: Aspen State: CO Zip Code: _8_1_6_1 _1 __ _ Billing Contact Email: aelli~@dunrene.com ~Pe~onAuthorizedtoS~n:_R_o_b_e_rt_~_c_G_~_g_o_r ____________ ~ Community Development Department 108 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 (970) 945-8212 www.garfield-county.com PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY TAX PARCEL NUMBER: 2185-354-15-002 DATE: March 8, 2016 Update: March 22, 2016 PROJECT: Eastbank Equine Hospital (Veterinary Clinic) OWNERS/APPLICANT: Eastbank, LLC REPRESENTATIVE: Robert McGregor and Chad Lee, Balcomb and Green PRACTICAL LOCATION: 3927 County Road 154 ZONING: Rural TYPE OF APPLICATION: Administrative Review I. GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION The applicant is requesting a permit to construct a new approximately 4,000 square foot building to house an equine hospital/veterinary clinic on an approximate 2+ acres of a larger 16.983 acre parcel. The property is located along County Road 154 just south of the intersection at State Highway 82. The parcel is located directly adjacent to the property occupied by FedEx. The property currently is being used as a truck repair and maintenance facility with outside storage of up to 30 vehicles which is recognized by the County as a legal non-conforming use on 3.9 acres of the site. The applicant would like to use the front half of the lot including the existing ~4,000 square foot structure (closest to CR 154) as a car repair and automotive facility that will also require a land use change permit through an administrative review. 1 The car repair facility application may be processed concurrently with an application for the proposed equine hospital. The equine hospital is proposed to occupy the area directly behind (northwest) of the proposed car repair facility and will include a new structure as well as outdoor rehabilitation areas. The facility will share the same main entry to the site with the proposed car repair facility as well as the adjacent FedEx facility. The Applicant will need to provide evidence that a County driveway permit is valid for this proposed use and will need to demonstrate that a State Highway access permit will not be required at the intersection of SH 82 and CR 154. Staff understands the property is currently served by a well and also by an ISDS system. Demonstration that these systems are sufficient to serve the new proposed use will also be required. II. REGULATORY PROVISIONS APPLICANT IS REQUIRED TO ADDRESS • Garfield County Comprehensive Plan 2030 • Garfield County Land Use and Development Code, as amended • Section 4-103, Administrative Review • Table 4-102, Common Review Procedures and Required Notice • Table 4-201, Application Submittal Requirements Approx. location of proposed equine hospital Approx. location of proposed car repair facility 2 III. REVIEW PROCESS • The review process shall follow the steps as contained in Table 4-102 and Section 4-103, Administrative Review. Please see attached for an Administrative Process Flow Chart. IV. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS Please refer directly to Table 4-201 and the list of General Application Materials in section 4-203. These application materials are generally summarized below:  4.230.B. General application materials o Application Form o Fee Payment and Payment Agreement Form o Pre-Application Conference Summary o Ownership Documentation (deed) and title information indicating if there are any lien holders and/or encumbrances (a title commitment may be necessary) o Statement of Authority or Letter of Authorization, if necessary (Not necessary if the owner does not have a representative or the property is not held by an LLC, corporation or trust) o Names and addresses of all property owners within 200 feet of project site and all mineral owners of the subject parcels (see attached memo). o Project Description  4-203.C. Vicinity Map (8.5 x 11)  4-203.D Site Plan  4-203.E. Grading and Drainage Plan demonstrating positive drainage off the site (topo map of property)  4-203.F. Landscaping Plan  4-203.G. Impact Analysis – Please respond to the identified impacts in Section 4-203(G)  4-203.L Traffic Study – It is anticipated that the Applicant will need to supply only a basic traffic study. Legal and adequate access from CR 154 will also need to be demonstrated.  4-203.M. Water Supply and Distribution Plan - Provide evidence (well permit, etc) that indicates legal ability to use well for the proposed use, in addition to other uses on the property. A 4-hour pump test and water quality testing is also required.  4-203-.N. Wastewater management and Treatment Plan – Provide evidence that either the existing ISDS is property designed to treat wastewater from the proposed use and other uses on the property, the ISDS can be modified to properly treat the wastewater, or design a new system for the appropriate treatment of wastewater for the proposed use. If outdoor animal storage is proposed, discussion should be included about the treatment and removal of animal waste from the site.  Respond to Standards fully described in Article 7, Divisions 1-3 of the Land Use and Development Code 3 Submit three paper copies and one CD for applications. Additional copies will be requested upon determination of completeness. See the land use code for more detailed information on submittal requirements. V. APPLICATION REVIEW a. Review by: Staff for completeness recommendation and referral agencies for additional technical review b. Public Hearing: _X_None (Director’s Decision) __Planning Commission __ Board of County Commissioners __ Board of Adjustment c. Referral Agencies: May include Garfield County Road and Bridge Department, Colorado Department of Transportation, RE-1 School District, Carbondale Rural and Fire Protection District, Garfield County Designated Engineer, City of Glenwood Springs, and/or Division of Water Resources. Note: Additional copies of the complete application will be requested once the application is deemed Technically Complete. These copies will be sent to the referral agencies for their review and comments VI. APPLICATION REVIEW FEES a. Planning Review Fees: $ 250.00 b. Referral Agency Fees: $ TBD – consulting engineer/civil engineer fees c. Total Deposit: $ 250.00 (additional hours are billed at $40.50 /hour) Disclaimer The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the County. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. This summary does not create a legal or vested right. The pre- application meeting summary is only valid for six (6) months from the date of the written summary. Pre-application Summary Prepared by: March 22, 2016 __________________________________________ _____________ Tamra Allen, Planning Manager Date 4 Customer Distribution Our Order Number: ABS63010685-3 Date: 05-09-2016 Property Address: TBD EASTBANK, GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 For Title Assistance SUSAN MOYA 2454 PATTERSON RD #100 GRAND JUNCTION, CO 81505 970-248-3883 (phone) 970-241-1593 (fax) smoya@ltgc.com PLEASE CONTACT YOUR CLOSER OR CLOSER'S ASSISTANT FOR WIRE TRANSFER INSTRUCTIONS BALCOMB & GREEN Attention: CHAD LEE PO DRAWER 790 818 COLORADO AVE GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81602 970-945-6546 (work) 970-945-8902 (work fax) clee@balcombgreen.com;natalie@balcombgreen.com;brittc@balcombgr een.com Delivered via: Electronic Mail Land Title Guarantee Company Estimate of Title Fees Order Number:ABS63010685-3 Date: 05-09-2016 Property Address:TBD EASTBANK, GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 Buyer/Borrower:A BUYER TO BE DETERMINED Seller:EASTBANK, LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY Visit Land Title's website at www.ltgc.com for directions to any of our offices. Estimate of Title Insurance Fees TBD Commitment TBD - TBD Income GWS-4529 $199.00 -$199.00 If Land Title Guarantee Company will be closing this transaction, the fees listed above will be collected at closing. Total $0.00 THANK YOU FOR YOUR ORDER! ALTA COMMITMENT Old Republic National Title Insurance Company Schedule A Order Number: ABS63010685-3 Customer Ref-Loan No.: Property Address: TBD EASTBANK, GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 1. Effective Date: 04-21-2016 At 5:00 P.M. 2. Policy to be Issued and Proposed Insured: "TBD" Commitment $0.00 Proposed Insured: A BUYER TO BE DETERMINED 3. The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment and covered herein is: A FEE SIMPLE 4. Title to the estate or interest covered herein is at the effective date hereof vested in: EASTBANK, LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY 5. The Land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows: LOT 1, LOT 2 AND LOT 3 AS DEPICTED ON THAT CERTAIN EASTBANK LLC MINOR SUBDIVISION PLAT AS RECORDED IN THE OFFICES OF THE CLERK AND RECORDER FOR GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO ON SEPTEMBER 8, 2015 AS RECEPTION NO. 867716 . COUNTY OF GARFIELD STATE OF COLORADO Copyright 2006-2016 American Land Title Association. All Rights Reserved The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. ALTA COMMITMENT Old Republic National Title Insurance Company Schedule B-1 (Requirements) Order Number: ABS63010685-3 The following are the requirements to be complied with: Payment to or for the account of the grantors or mortgagors of the full consideration for the estate or interest to be insured. Proper instrument(s) creating the estate or interest to be insured must be executed and duly filed for record, to-wit: THIS COMMITMENT IS FOR INFORMATION ONLY, AND NO POLICY WILL BE ISSUED PURSUANT HERETO. Old Republic National Title Insurance Company Schedule B-2 (Exceptions) Order Number: ABS63010685-3 The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company: 1.Any facts, rights, interests, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records but that could be ascertained by an inspection of the Land or that may be asserted by persons in possession of the Land. 2.Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records. 3.Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land and not shown by the Public Records. 4.Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the Public Records. 5.Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date of the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. 6.(a) Taxes or assessments that are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the Public Records; (b) proceedings by a public agency that may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the Public Records. 7.(a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water. 8.RIGHT OF PROPRIETOR OF A VEIN OR LODE TO EXTRACT AND REMOVE HIS ORE THEREFROM SHOULD THE SAME BE FOUND TO PENETRATE OR INTERSECT THE PREMISES AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED MAY 20, 1899, IN BOOK 12 AT PAGE 508, AND RECORDED JUNE 1, 1899 IN BOOK 12 AT PAGE 510 AND AT PAGE 511 AND AT PAGE 512. 9.RIGHT OF WAY FOR DITCHES OR CANALS CONSTRUCTED BY THE AUTHORITY OF THE UNITED STATES AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED MAY 20, 1899, IN BOOK 12 AT PAGE 508, AND AS RECORDED JUNE 1, 1899 IN BOOK 12 AT PAGE 510 AND AT PAGE 511 AND AT PAGE 512. 10.UTILITY EASEMENT AS GRANTED TO MOUNTAIN STATES TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED AUGUST 29, 1929, IN BOOK 161 AT PAGE 261 AND AS RECORDEDJULY 13, 1931 IN BOOK 164 AT PAGE 152 AND AS RECORDED OCTOBER 29, 1964 IN BOOK 361 AT PAGE 477. 11.TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF EASEMENT FOR WATER LINE RECORDED FEBRUARY 15, 1985 IN BOOK 664 AT PAGE 356. 12.TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF RESOLUTION #97-92 RECORDED OCTOBER 07, 1997 IN BOOK 1037 AT PAGE 381. 13.RIGHT OF WAY FOR THE DENVER AND RIO GRANDE WESTERN RAILWAY. 14.RIGHT OF WAY FOR THE ROARING FORK RIVER. Old Republic National Title Insurance Company Schedule B-2 (Exceptions) Order Number: ABS63010685-3 The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company: 15.ANY QUESTION, DISPUTE OR ADVERSE CLAIMS AS TO ANY LOSS OR GAIN OF LAND AS A RESULT OF ANY CHANGE IN THE RIVER BED LOCATION BY NATURAL OR OTHER THAN NATURAL CAUSES, OR ALTERATION THROUGH ANY CAUSE, NATURAL OR UNNATURAL, OF THE CENTER THREAD, BANK, CHANNEL OR FLOW OF WATERS IN THE ROARING FORK RIVER RIVER LYING WITHIN SUBJECT LAND; AND ANY QUESTION AS TO THE LOCATION OF SUCH CENTER THREAD, BED, BANK OR CHANNEL AS A LEGAL DESCRIPTION MONUMENT OR MARKER FOR PURPOSES OF DESCRIBING OR LOCATING SUBJECT LANDS. 16.RIGHTS AND EASEMENTS FOR NAVIGATION AND FISHERY IN FAVOR OF THE PUBLIC WHICH MAY EXIST OVER THAT PORTION OF SAID LAND LYING BENEATH THE WATER OF THE ROARING FORK RIVER. 17.ANY INCREASE OR DECREASE IN THE AREA OF THE LAND AND ANY ADVERSE CLAIM TO ANY PORTION OF THE LAND WHICH HAS BEEN CREATED BY OR CAUSED BY ACCRETION OR RELICTION, WHETHER NATURAL OR ARTIFICIAL; AND THE EFFECT OF THE GAIN OR LOSS OF AREA BY ACCRETION OR RELICTION UPON THE MARKETABILITY OF THE TITLE OF THE LAND. 18.ANY RIGHTS OR INTERESTS OF THIRD PARTIES WHICH EXIST OR ARE CLAIMED TO EXIST IN AND OVER THE PRESENT AND PAST BED, BANKS OR WATERS OF THE ROARING FORK RIVER. 19.TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT RECORDED FEBRUARY 02, 2001 IN BOOK 1230 AT PAGE 47. 20.TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF AGRICULTURAL ENCROACHMENT LICENSE RECORDED AUGUST 22, 2005 AT RECEPTION NO. 680632. 21.TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF GAS GATHERING AGREEMENT RECORDED JULY 29, 2008 AT RECEPTION NO. 753222. 22.EASEMENTS, CONDITIONS, COVENANTS, RESTRICTIONS, RESERVATIONS AND NOTES ON THE MAP OF EASTBANK LOT SPLIT RECORDED JUNE 30, 2009 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 770436. 23.EASEMENTS, CONDITIONS, COVENANTS, RESTRICTIONS, RESERVATIONS AND NOTES ON THE MAP OF EASTBANK PARCEL 2 LOT SPLIT RECORDED JANUARY 18, 2012 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 813402. 24.TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS, BURDENS, OBLIGATIONS AND EASEMENTS AS SET FORTH AND GRANTED IN ACCESS AND UTILITY EASEMENT AGREEMENT RECORDED JUNE 30, 2009 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 770443. 25.TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS, BURDENS, OBLIGATIONS AND EASEMENTS AS SET FORTH AND GRANTED IN ACCESS AND UTILITY EASEMENT AGREEMENT RECORDED JANUARY 18, 2012 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 813409. 26.ANY FACTS, RIGHTS, INTERESTS OR CLAIMS WHICH MAY EXIST OR ARISE BY REASON OF THE FOLLOWING FACTS SHOWN ON IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT DATED AUGUST 11, 2011, LAST REVISED JANUARY 12, 2012 PREPARED BY HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC.: Old Republic National Title Insurance Company Schedule B-2 (Exceptions) Order Number: ABS63010685-3 The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company: A) FENCE LINES ARE NOT COINCIDENT WITH PROPERTY LINES. B) SHARED ROADS CROSSING SUBJECT PROPERTY. C) OVERHEAD UTILITY LINE CROSSING SUBJECT PROPERTY WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF A RECORDED EASEMENT. 27.DEED OF TRUST DATED JANUARY 21, 2011, FROM A BUYER TO BE DETERMINED TO THE PUBLIC TRUSTEE OF GARFIELD COUNTY FOR THE USE OF ALPINE BANK TO SECURE THE SUM OF $2,000,000.00 RECORDED JANUARY 21, 2011, UNDER RECEPTION NO. 797840. MODIFICATION AGREEMENT IN CONNECTION WITH SAID DEED OF TRUST WAS RECORDED JULY 21, 2011 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 805512. DEED OF TRUST DATED JANUARY 21, 2011, FROM A BUYER TO BE DETERMINED TO THE PUBLIC TRUSTEE OF GARFIELD COUNTY FOR THE USE OF ALPINE BANK TO SECURE THE SUM OF $200,000.00 RECORDED JANUARY 21, 2011, UNDER RECEPTION NO. 797841. MODIFICATION AGREEMENT IN CONNECTION WITH SAID DEED OF TRUST WAS RECORDED JULY 20, 2011 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 805473. 28.DEED OF TRUST DATED JANUARY 21, 2011, FROM A BUYER TO BE DETERMINED TO THE PUBLIC TRUSTEE OF GARFIELD COUNTY FOR THE USE OF ALPINE BANK TO SECURE THE SUM OF $550,000.00 RECORDED JANUARY 21, 2011, UNDER RECEPTION NO. 797842. DISBURSER'S NOTICE IN CONNECTION WITH SAID DEED OF TRUST WAS RECORDED JANUARY 21, 2011, UNDER RECEPTION NO. 797843. MODIFICATION AGREEMENT IN CONNECTION WITH SAID DEED OF TRUST WAS RECORDED JULY 20, 2011 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 805474. 29.DEED OF TRUST DATED JANUARY 13, 2012 FROM EASTBANK, LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY TO THE PUBLIC TRUSTEE OF GARFIELD COUNTY FOR THE USE OF ALPINE BANK TO SECURE THE SUM OF $1,500,000.00, AND ANY OTHER AMOUNTS PAYABLE UNDER THE TERMS THEREOF, RECORDED JANUARY 18, 2012, UNDER RECEPTION NO. 813411 . NOTE: THE COMMITMENT DOES NOT REFLECT THE STATUS OF TITLE TO WATER RIGHTS OR REPRESENTATION OF SAID RIGHTS. 30.EASEMENTS, CONDITIONS, COVENANTS, RESTRICTIONS, RESERVATIONS AND NOTES ON THE PLAT OF EASTBANK, LLC MINOR SUBDIVSION RECORDED SEPTEMBER 08, 2015 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 867716 . JOINT NOTICE OF PRIVACY POLICY OF LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY, LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY - GRAND JUNCTION, LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY OF SUMMIT COUNTY LAND TITLE INSURANCE CORPORATION AND OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY This Statement is provided to you as a customer of Land Title Guarantee Company and Meridian Land Title, LLC, as agents for Land Title Insurance Corporation and Old Republic National Title Insurance Company. We want you to know that we recognize and respect your privacy expectations and the requirements of federal and state privacy laws. Information security is one of our highest priorities. We recognize that maintaining your trust and confidence is the bedrock of our business. We maintain and regularly review internal and external safeguards against unauthorized access to non-public personal information ("Personal Information"). In the course of our business, we may collect Personal Information about you from: applications or other forms we receive from you, including communications sent through TMX, our web-based transaction management system; your transactions with, or from the services being performed by, us, our affiliates, or others; a consumer reporting agency, if such information is provided to us in connection with your transaction; and the public records maintained by governmental entities that we either obtain directly from those entities, or from our affiliates and non-affiliates. Our policies regarding the protection of the confidentiality and security of your Personal Information are as follows: We restrict access to all Personal Information about you to those employees who need to know that information in order to provide products and services to you. We maintain physical, electronic and procedural safeguards that comply with federal standards to protect your Personal Information from unauthorized access or intrusion. Employees who violate our strict policies and procedures regarding privacy are subject to disciplinary action. We regularly access security standards and procedures to protect against unauthorized access to Personal Information. WE DO NOT DISCLOSE ANY PERSONAL INFORMATION ABOUT YOU WITH ANYONE FOR ANY PURPOSE THAT IS NOT PERMITTED BY LAW. Consistent with applicable privacy laws, there are some situations in which Personal Information may be disclosed. We may disclose your Personal Information when you direct or give us permission; when we are required by law to do so, for example, if we are served a subpoena; or when we suspect fraudulent or criminal activities. We also may disclose your Personal Information when otherwise permitted by applicable privacy laws such as, for example, when disclosure is needed to enforce our rights arising out of any agreement, transaction or relationship with you. Our policy regarding dispute resolution is as follows. Any controversy or claim arising out of or relating to our privacy policy, or the breach thereof, shall be settled by arbitration in accordance with the rules of the American Arbitration Association, and judgment upon the award rendered by the arbitrator(s) may be entered in any court having jurisdiction thereof. LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY - GRAND JUNCTION DISCLOSURE STATEMENTS Note: Pursuant to CRS 10-11-122, notice is hereby given that: A)The Subject real property may be located in a special taxing district. B)A certificate of taxes due listing each taxing jurisdiction will be obtained from the county treasurer of the county in which the real property is located or that county treasurer's authorized agent unless the proposed insured provides written instructions to the contrary. (for an Owner's Policy of Title Insurance pertaining to a sale of residential real property) C)The information regarding special districts and the boundaries of such districts may be obtained from the Board of County Commissioners, the County Clerk and Recorder, or the County Assessor. Note: Effective September 1, 1997, CRS 30-10-406 requires that all documents received for recording or filing in the clerk and recorder's office shall contain a top margin of at least one inch and a left, right and bottom margin of at least one half of an inch. The clerk and recorder may refuse to record or file any document that does not conform, except that, the requirement for the top margin shall not apply to documents using forms on which space is provided for recording or filing information at the top margin of the document. Note: Colorado Division of Insurance Regulations 3-5-1, Paragraph G of Article VII requires that "Every title entity shall be responsible for all matters which appear of record prior to the time of recording whenever the title entity conducts the closing and is responsible for recording or filing of legal documents resulting from the transaction which was closed". Provided that Land Title Guarantee Company conducts the closing of the insured transaction and is responsible for recording the legal documents from the transaction, exception number 5 will not appear on the Owner's Title Policy and the Lenders Policy when issued. Note: Affirmative mechanic's lien protection for the Owner may be available (typically by deletion of Exception no. 4 of Schedule B-2 of the Commitment from the Owner's Policy to be issued) upon compliance with the following conditions: A)The land described in Schedule A of this commitment must be a single family residence which includes a condominium or townhouse unit. B)No labor or materials have been furnished by mechanics or material-men for purposes of construction on the land described in Schedule A of this Commitment within the past 6 months. C)The Company must receive an appropriate affidavit indemnifying the Company against un-filed mechanic's and material-men's liens. D)The Company must receive payment of the appropriate premium. E)If there has been construction, improvements or major repairs undertaken on the property to be purchased within six months prior to the Date of the Commitment, the requirements to obtain coverage for unrecorded liens will include: disclosure of certain construction information; financial information as to the seller, the builder and or the contractor; payment of the appropriate premium fully executed Indemnity Agreements satisfactory to the company, and, any additional requirements as may be necessary after an examination of the aforesaid information by the Company. No coverage will be given under any circumstances for labor or material for which the insured has contracted for or agreed to pay. Note: Pursuant to CRS 10-11-123, notice is hereby given: This notice applies to owner's policy commitments disclosing that a mineral estate has been severed from the surface estate, in Schedule B-2. A)That there is recorded evidence that a mineral estate has been severed, leased, or otherwise conveyed from the surface estate and that there is a substantial likelihood that a third party holds some or all interest in oil, gas, other minerals, or geothermal energy in the property; and B)That such mineral estate may include the right to enter and use the property without the surface owner's permission. Note: Pursuant to CRS 10-1-128(6)(a), It is unlawful to knowingly provide false, incomplete, or misleading facts or information to an insurance company for the purpose of defrauding or attempting to defraud the company. Penalties may include imprisonment, fines, denial of insurance, and civil damages. Any insurance company or agent of an insurance company who knowingly provides false, incomplete, or misleading facts or information to a policyholder or claimant for the purpose of defrauding or attempting to defraud the policyholder or claimant with regard to a settlement or award payable from insurance proceeds shall be reported to the Colorado Division of Insurance within the Department of Regulatory Agencies. Commitment to Insure ALTA Commitment - 2006 Rev. OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Minnesota corporation, (Company) for a valuable consideration, commits to issue its policy or policies of title insurance, as identified in Schedule A, in favor of the Proposed Insured named in Schedule A, as owner or mortgagee of the estate or interest in the land described or referred to in Schedule A, upon payment of the premiums and charges and compliance with the requirements; all subject to the provisions of Schedule A and B and to the Conditions of this Commitment. This Commitment shall be effective only when the identity of the Proposed Insured and the amount of the policy or policies committed for have been inserted in Schedule A by the Company. All liability and obligation under this commitment shall cease and terminate six months after the Effective Date or when the policy or policies committed for shall issue, whichever first occurs, provided that the failure to issue such policy or policies is not the fault of the Company. CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS 1.The term "mortgage", when used herein, shall include deed of trust, trust deed, or other security instrument. 2.If the proposed Insured has or acquires actual knowledge of any defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter affecting the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment other than those shown in Schedule B hereof, and shall fail to disclose such knowledge to Company in writing, the Company shall be relieved from liability for any loss or damage resulting from any act of reliance hereon to the extent the Company is prejudiced by failure to so disclose such knowledge. If the proposed Insured shall disclose such knowledge to the Company, or if the Company otherwise acquires actual knowledge of any such defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter, the Company at its option may amend Schedule B of this Commitment accordingly, but such amendment shall not relieve the Company from liability previously incurred pursuant to paragraph 3 of these Conditions and Stipulations. 3.Liability of the Company under this Commitment shall be only to the named proposed Insured and such parties included under the definition of Insured in the form of policy or policies committed for and only for actual loss incurred in reliance hereon in undertaking in good faith (a) to comply with the requirements hereof or (b) to eliminate exceptions shown in Schedule B, or (c) to acquire or create the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. In no event shall such liability exceed the amount stated in Schedule A for the policy or policies committed for and such liability is subject to the insuring provisions and the Conditions and Stipulations and the Exclusions from Coverage of the form of policy or policies committed for in favor of the proposed Insured which are hereby incorporated by reference and are made a part of this Commitment except as expressly modified herein. 4.This commitment is a contract to issue one or more title insurance policies and is not an abstract of title or a report of the condition of title. Any action or actions or rights of action that the proposed Insured may have or may bring against the Company arising out of the status of the title to the estate or interest or the status of the mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment must be based on and are subject to the provisions of this Commitment. 5.The policy to be issued contains an arbitration clause. All arbitrable matters when the Amount of Insurance is $2,000,000 or less shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Insured as the exclusive remedy of the parties. You may review a copy of the arbitration rules at www.alta.org. STANDARD EXCEPTIONS In addition to the matters contained in the Conditions and Stipulations and Exclusions from Coverage above referred to, this Commitment is also subject to the following: 1.Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the Public Records. 2.Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the Public Records. 3.Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, and any facts which a correct survey or inspection of the Land would disclose and which are not shown by the Public Records. 4.Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material theretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the Public Records. 5.Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the Public Records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Old Republic National Title Insurance Company has caused its corporate name and seal to be affixed by its duly authorized officers on the date shown in Schedule A to be valid when countersigned by a validating officer or other authorized signatory. Old Republic National Title Insurance Company a Stock Company 400 Second Avenue South Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612)371-1111 Authorized Officer or Agent Issued by: Land Title Guarantee Company 3033 East First Avenue Suite 600 Denver, Colorado 80206 303-321-1880 John E. Freyer, President After recording olease return to : Thomas J. Hartert, Esq. Balcomb & Green, P.C. P.O. Drawer 790 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 ,~~~;1:,~~Jl~;r·tJ~~ :~~~ ~~r~n™~~ .H 11111 'J 1 of 2 Rec Fee :$16.00 Doc Fee :0 .00 G~RFIE L D COUNTY CO SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED THIS DEED, made this /0'!1. day of September, 2015, between the ELIZABETH MACGREGOR IRREVOCABLE TRUST DA TED DECEMBER 27, 2000, whose legal address is c/o Steven M. Marolt, PO Box 10671, Aspen, CO 81612, (Grantor), and EASTBANI<, LLC a Colorado limited liability company, whose legal address is 710 East Durant Avenue, Unit W-6, Aspen, CO 81611, County of Pitkin and State of Colorado, (Grantee): WITNESSETH, that the Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten and no/100 Dollars ($10.00), the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, hereby grants, bargains, sells, conveys and confirms, unto the Grantee and the Grantee's heirs and assigns forever, all of its undivided six and one-half percent (6.5%) tenant-in-common interest in and to the real property, together with any improvements thereon, located in the County of Garfield and State of Colorado described as follows: SEE EXHIBIT A ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF. TOGETHER with all and singular the hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging, or in anywise appertaining, the reversions, remainders, rents, issues and profits thereof, and all the estate, right, title, interest, claim and demand whatsoever of the Grantor, either in law or equity, of, in and to the above bargained premises, with the hereditaments and appurtenances. To HA VE AND TO HOLD the said premises above bargained and described, with the appurtenances, unto the Grantee, and the Grantee's heirs and assigns forever. The Grantor, for itself, its successors and assigns, does covenant and agree that the Grantor shall and will WARRANT AND FOREVER DEFEND the above-bargained premises in the quiet and peaceable possession of the Grantee and the heirs and assigns of the Grantee, against all and every person or persons claiming the whole or any part thereof, by, through or under the Grantor except and subject to easements, restrictions, reservations and any other matters of record as of the date hereof and any rights of way of record, or situate and in use as of the date hereof and real property taxes for 2015 not yet due or payable; and expressly including, without warranty, any and all mineral estate and water or ditch rights and interests appurtenant thereto or historically used ·thereon. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has executed this Deed on the date set forth above. STATE OF COLORADO COUNTY OF f CT ~ ,-Al ) ) SS. ) ELIZABETH MACGREGOR IRREVOCABLE TRUST DA TED C ER 27, 2000 l O·(lr The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of September, 2015, by Steven M. Marolt as Trustee of the Elizabeth Macgregor Irrevocable Trust Dated December 27, 2000. Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires: _].........,_} 2--=-....;3~/_i...v---=-_l_C\.~--- / I r----~~---------A UDR E Y ELLIS NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF COLORADO NOTARY ID #20034024415 My Commission Expires July 23, 2019 Notary Pub!~~ ili UPON RECORDING RETURN TO: Balcomb & Green, P.C. ATTN: Thomas J. Hartert P.O. Drawer 790 Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 EXHBIIT A Property Description Lot I, Lot 2 and Lot 3 as depicted on that certain EASTBANK LLC MINOR SUBDIVISION Plat as recorded in the Offices of the Clerk and Recorder for Garfield County, Colorado on September~, 2015 as Reception No. '"8,fo} °'l" 1. Co -------- '( . l\ t..t After recording please return to : Ill ~1 r_,~~11 ~~11 H'i ~ ~1 ,,~if11'"~ '~~~'mw~i,: ~~'~i· ,,,,, 1111 Reception~: 867830 Thomas J . Hartert, Esq . Balcomb & Green, P.C. P.O . Drawer 790 G9/10/2015 03 :26 :18 PM Jean Alberico 1 of 2 Rec Fee :$16 .00 Doc Fee :0 .00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED -t:!l. . THIS DEED, made this /0 day of September, 2015, between the FLORA MACGREGOR IRREVOCABLE TRUST DATED DECEMBER 27, 2000, whose legal address is c/o Steven M. Marolt, PO Box 10671, Aspen, CO 81612, (Grantor), and EASTBANI<, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, whose legal address is 710 East Durant A venue, Unit W-6, Aspen, CO 81611, County of Pitkin and State of Colorado, (Grantee): WITNESSETH, that the Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten and No/I 00 Dollars ($10.00), the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, hereby grants, bargains, sells, conveys and confirms, unto the Grantee and the Grantee's heirs and assigns forever, all of its undivided six and one-half percent (6.5%) tenant-in-common interest in and to the real property, together with any improvements thereon, located in the County of Garfield and State of Colorado described ~ follows: SEE EXHIBIT A ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF. TOGETHER with all and singular the hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging, or in anywise appertaining, the reversions, remainders, rents, issues and profits thereof,. and all the estate, right, title, interest, claim and demand whatsoever of the Grantor, either in law or equity, of, in and to the above bargained premises, with the hereditaments and appurtenances. To HA VE AND TO HOLD the said premises above bargained and described, with the appurtenances, unto the Grantee, and the Grantee's heirs and assigns forever. The Grantor, for itself, its successors and assigns, does · covenant and agree that the Grantor shall and will WARRANT AND FOREVER DEFEND the above-bargained premises in the quiet and peaceable possession of the Grantee and the heirs and assigns of the Grantee, against all and every person or persons claiming the whole or any part thereof, by, through or under the Grantor except and subject to easements, restrictions, reservations and any other matters of record as of the date hereof and any rights of way of record, or situate a,nd in use as of the date h~reof and real property taxes for 2015 not yet due or payable; and expressly including, without warranty any and all mineral estate and water or ditch rights and interests appurtenant thereto or historically used .thereon. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has ex.ecuted this Deed on the date set forth above. STATE OF COLORADO COUNTY OF. e l TiUI J ). ) SS. ) The foregoing instrumet:it.was acknowledged before m.e this l on+-day of September, 2015, by Steven M. Marolt as Trustee of the Flora Macgregor Irrevocable Trust Dated December 27, 2000. Witness my hand and official seal. AUDREY ELLIS NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF COLORADO NOTARY ID #20034024415 My Commission Expires July 23, 2019 UPON RECORDING RETURN TO: Balcomb & Green, P.C. ATTN: Thomas J. Hartert P.O. Drawer 790 Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 EXHBIIT A Property Description Lot I, Lot 2 and Lot 3 as depicted on that certain EASTBANK LLC MINOR SUBDIVISION Plat as recorded in the Offices of the Clerk and Recorder for Garfield County, Colorado on September _JL, 2015 as Reception No. 8'=»-=1-:r1-to Reception#:813404 01/19/201201:47:00PM JeanAlberico 1 of 1 Rec Fee:$11.00Doc Fee:0.00GARFIELDCOUNTYCO Statement of Authority (C.R.S.38-30-172) 1.This Statement of Authorityrelatesto an entitylnamed:EASTBANK,LLC 2.The type of entityisa: 0 Corporation O Registeredlimitedliabilitypartnership O Non-profitCorporation 0 Registeredlimitedliabilitylimitedpartnership 121 Limitedliabilitycompany 0 Limitedpartnershipassociation 0 Generalpartnership O Government or governmental subdivisionor 0 Limitedpartnership agency 3.The entityisformed under the laws of State of Colorado. 4.The mailing address of the entityis:710 East Durant Avenue,Unit W-6,Aspen, Colorado 81611. 5.The U name and 2 positionof each person authorizedto execute instruments conveying,encumbering,or otherwiseaffectingtitleto realpropertyon behalfof the entityis:Robert Duncan Macgregor,President of Dunrene Management,Inc.,a Colorado corporation,Manager of Eastbank,LLC. 6.2The authorityof the foregoing person(s)to bind the entityis 9 not limited Cl limitedas follows:N/A 7.Other matters concerning the manner in which the entitydeals with interestsin real property:N/A 8.3This Statement of Authority is executed on behalf of the entitypursuant to the provisionsof C.R.S.(38-30-172. 9.This Statement of Authority amends and supercedes in all respects any prior Statementof Authorityexecuted on behalfof the ent . Executed this12m day of January 2012. By: olfertDuncan Macgregor STATE OF COLORADO ) COUNTY O ss The foregoinginstrumentwas acknowledged before me this12 day of January 2012 by Robert Duncan Macgregor,President of Dunrene Management,Inc.,a Colorado corporation,Manager of Eastbank,LLC,a Colorado limitedliabilitycompany. Witness my hand and officialseal. My Commission expires:4/18 /),al 5 AUDREY ELLIS /;NOTARY PUBLIC 0 STATE OF COLORADO Notary'tiblic y issiodExoires07/23/2015 'Thisform shouldnotbe used unlesstheentityiscapableofholdingtitleto realproperty. 2 The absence ofany limitationshallbe prima facieevidencethatno such limitationexists. a The statementofauthoritymust be recordedtoobtainthebenefitsofthestatute. Strikeifnotapplicable,a r 6 PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 200 FEET 2185-353-15-003 Eastbank LLC 710 E. Durant Avenue, Unit W6 Aspen, CO 81611 2185-353-00-060 Roaring Fork RE-1 School District 1521 Grand Avenue Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 2185-353-15-001 KW Glenwood Springs LLC P.O. Box 979 Telluride, CO 81435 2185-354-23-007 Blue Heron Properties LLC 1007 Westbank Road Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 2185-353-04-002 Robert Duncan MacGregor 710 East Durant Avenue, Unit W-6 Aspen, CO 81611 2185-354-00-017 James L. Rose P.O. Box 432 Rifle, CO 81650-0432 2185-354-00-059 Roaring Fork Transportation Authority 530 E. Main Street Aspen, CO 81611 2185-354-00-024 2185-354-00-025 Shane & Bruce’s LLC 4185 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 2185-354-03-026 Thomas and Luana Strazza 416 Meadow Lane Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 2185-354-00-012 LB Rose Ranch LLC 1007 Westbank Road Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 2185-352-00-004 L & Y Jammaron Family LLLP 4915 Highway 82 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601-9622 Colorado Department of Transportation 202 Centennial Drive Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 MINERAL OWNERS Eastbank, LLC 710 E. Durant Avenue, Unit W6 Aspen, CO 81611 0 0 Mineral Ownership The applicant has reviewed the records at the Garfield County Assessor's Office and at the Garfield County Clerk & Recorder's office and based on the records reviewed, the surface owners are also the mineral owners. The letter below states that based on a review of the title commitment, the minerals have not been severed. The mineral owners or lessees are noted on the Minor Subdivision Plat. LAW OFFICES Mendelsohn Oseran & Spencer, PLC GinaMarie K. Spencer Davis Farrar Western Slope Consulting 0165 Basalt Mountain Drive Carbondale, CO 81623 Re: Property: Dear Mr. Farrar: 2525 East Broadway, Suite 20 I Tucson, Arizona 85716 March 6, 2015 Telephone (520) 325. 7500 Facsimile (520) 323-6614 gspenccr@moslawycrs.com Eastbank Parcel 2 Lot Split, according to plat filed January 18, 2012, at Reception No. 813402, County of Garfield, State of Colorado You have inquired whether notice needs to be provided to any mineral estate owner of the land split application related to the above-referenced Property. Based solely on and limited to my review of that certain commitment for title insurance dated effective January 19, 2015, prepared by Advanced Title Company as agent for Stewart Title Guaranty Company, and . the underlying documents referenced therein, the mineral rights appurtenant to the fee estate of the above-referenced Property have not been specifically severed of record. There is a general reservation in the patent for the Property. Thank you for your attention. & SPENCER, PLC GMS:law c, via e-mail: KW Glenwood Springs, LLC Page-40 BALCOMB & GREEN, PC A FULL SERVICE LAW FIRM SINCE 1953 May 13, 2016 Mr. David Pesnichak Garfield County Community Development Department Planning Manager 108 8th St. #401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Chad J. Lee, Esq.* Telephone (970) 945-6546 Facsimile (970) 945-8902 clee@balcombgreen.com *Licensed in CO and WY Re: Application for Veterinary Clinic-Administrative Review Dear Mr. Pesnichak: We are pleased to present the enclosed application for an equine hospital (veterinary clinic) for Administrative Review on a parcel adjacent to County Road 154, known as Garfield County Assessor's Parcel Number 2185-354-15-002. Enclosed are all required submittals pursuant to the Garfield County Land Use and Development Code (LUDC). The Property is located in the County's Rural zone designation, which encourages agricultural uses. The proposed user is an equine veterinarian who will service all of Garfield County, including the Roaring Fork Valley, and support Garfield County's agricultural operations. The site is situated off County Road 154 adjacent to a light industrial area with direct access to the signalized intersection at Highway 82. The location offers good access to the Roaring Fork Valley region and is compatible with adjacent land uses. The building design and function will be compatible with adjacent existing structures. The resulting traffic impact from this application together with the proposed vehicle repair shop is that there will be 1/3 of the traffic of the existing InterMountain Waste operation. The equine hospital anticipates a maximum of 12 customer visits in an average Basalt Office: 211 Midland Avenue, Ste. 201 Basalt, CO 81621 Glenwood Springs Office: 818 Colorado Avenue Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Aspen Office: 0133 Prospector Road, Ste. 4102E Aspen, CO 81611 P.O. Box 790 , Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 • (970) 945-6546 • www.balcombgreen.com 1 ·;t~ll BALCOMB & GREEN, PC • :: A FULL SERVICE LAW FffiM SINCE 1953 Letter to Dave Pesnichak May9,2016 Page 2 of 2 week, and may require up to 6 full time employees at full buildout. A busy day will average 34 average daily traffic (ADT) trips per day. The proposed facility is approximately 4,200 square foot metal structure with the majority of activities occurring inside the building. The structure will be aesthetically consistent with the structure on the adjacent Fed Ex site, including the color, corrugation, and roof. There is a small pen outside the building which will be used to evaluate horses. Attached is a site plan further delineating the uses on the site. Please do not hesitate to contact me with further questions. Sincerely, BALCOMB & GREEN, P.C. ChadJ. E-. dee@balcombgreen.com cc : Eastbank, LLC Owner Inf ormationEASTBANK LLC710 E DURANT AVE UNIT W6ASPEN, CO 81611Parcel Number: 218535415002Site Informa tionAcres: 16.983Account Number: R083595 Garfield County, CODate Printed: May 2, 2016 This map is for illustrative purposes only and does not represent a survey. It is provided 'as is' without warranty orany representation of accuracy, timeliness or completeness. The user acknowledges and accepts all inherentlimitations of the maps and data, including the fact that the maps and data are dynamic and in a constant state ofrevision, maintenance, and correction. No liability is assumed by Garfield County as to the accuracy of the datadelineated herein. ±0 200 400 600 800 1000 Feet .. inrmt, __..-::: ------ - - - - - -::.------::.-:.:.:::::::::::>)<::" ------.....--:::: -----===-==-=:=-:::-:::..:::..::::..:=.:-:..:::::::.----- - - - - - ----------- LOT 2 EASTBANK MINOR SUBDIVISION OVERALL BOUNDARY MAP SCALE 1 "=200' LOT 1 LOT 2 FUTURE FlRE HYDRANT {IF REQUIRED BY THE GLENWOOD SPRINGS FlRE DEPARTMENT IN FUTURE BUILDING PERMIT REVIEWS) 2"¢ WATER SERVICE TO B CAPPED ONCE THE B" LINE IS CONNECTED TO THE ROARIN FORK WATER AND SANITATION DISTRICT MAIN INSTALL FUTURE TRANSFORMER REPLACE EXISTING SERVICE WITH 2"¢ SERVICE TO TEMPORARILY---.l SERVE BOTH BUILDINGS EXISTING WELL TO BE ABANDONED ONCE THE CONNECTION TO THE FUTURE ROARING FORK WATER AND SANITATION DISTRICT SE~ .... ~6 ... ·~ END TELEPHON ~,~ ' ~ 4l!"¢ SANITARY AND GAS ~ \ SEWER MANHOLE INSTALLATION .l" INSTALL TEMPORAR~ ~ 1,500 GALLON ONE CHAMBER NORWESCO TO BE PUMPED BY TRUCKS UNTIL THE CONNECTION TO THE FUTURE SANITARY SEWER MAIN TO THE SOUlHEAST 1~ tY'IUPl~TFn FUTURE GAS/TELEPHONE/ELECTRIC SERVICE TO BE FROM THE FUTURE LINES COMPLETED AS PART OF THE SCHOOL DISTRICT ACCESS ROAD CONSTRUCTION I I ~ rJ .•. '·'· '·'· '·'· 1; :: .:: .:: .:: .:: .:: .:: .:: .:: ·. w w ___ ,. ___ _ • ---11----I --OE----OE ---T----T • +Cf 0 8S • I OE T LEGEND Ill EXISTING ASPHALT PAVING PROPOSED BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING PROPOSED GRA va CONCRETE PROPOSED 8" CLASS 52 DUCTILE IRON PIPE PROPOSED 1.5", 2", OR 4" WATER SERVICE PROPOSED 8" ¢ SDR 35 PVC SEWER MAIN PROPOSED 4"¢ PVC SEWER SERVICE PROPOSED GAS SERVICE (SIZING ANO MATERIAL PER BLACK HIUS ENERGY) PROPOSED ELECTRIC SERVICE EXISTING OVERHEAD ELECTRIC PROPOSED TELEPHONE SERVICE 4l!"¢ SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE WATER SERVICE CURB STOP PROPOSED STORM SEWER PIPE PROPOSED DRYWELL NOTE: UTILITIES LINETIPES SHADED GREY ARE SHOWN SCHEMATICALLY FOR FUTURE CONSTRUCTION. FUTURE 8"¢ WATER LINE TO BE EXTENDED WITH THE SCHOOL DISTRICT ACCESS ROAD CONSTRUCTION GRAPHIC SCALE ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 30 ft. --------------------~--- EXISTING ELECTRIC SERVICE _... _... --" URCE TO BE MAINTAINED _.-_... ~ AND METERED TILL FUTURE .-_... _... ------__...-rft--- ELECTRIC CORRIDOR IS - -_... .---:::>< - ---------------~5;'.t:~~DS~VI~~ ~gu;E------------------~oo ------ - - -- - - - - - _ _ _ _ _ INST&-LEilJ.N--8AM!"1'R'E:NCH -- - -o,£. --- - ----------___... ----0 --- MAIN IS COMPLETED _...--..---.-----~~ ----~ -_.,. -----.-.--DE --- .-_,. ---------oE ----~o<---------~-=--or.::::="' ------------~ -------------..... ---,,.,---------------~ -- - - - - - - --==-==-=-~--= --DE ·U~ ~ .-----DE----~ oE----DE ,,,,..,--// OE~ DE-------- _.-aE---- -------- OE ---.-c:c:::.l''°" ----o<----------------- z 0 Ui ~ 0:: ci z Cl 0:: ~Cl ~ " ~~ " 0:: ~ tO 6 :J ::;: lb w w !( ~ " ii: PROJECT NO. 2151007.00 MU LOT 1 .... .' ("" I I I ~ ~ ·! ·.' ·! ·.' ·! ·.' ·! ·.'; ... , , "·'·"·'·"·'· ·;·;·;·, ·, ·, ·, ·, ·, . LEGEND EXISTING ASPHALT PA~NG PROPOSED BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING PROPOSED GRA va EXISTING CONCRETE ---5950---EXISTING 5' MAJOR CONTOUR EXISTING 1' MINOR CONTOUR PROPOSED 1' CONTOUR BY LOT 1 PROPOSED 5' MAJOR CONTOUR PROPOSED 1' MINOR CONTOUR PROPOSED SEDIMENT CONTROL FENCE ---5949--- ------------ PROPOSED STORM SEWER PIPE PROPOSED DRYWELL PROPOSED VEHICLE TRACKING CONTROL SPOT ELEVATION, 00.00 = 5900.00' GRAPHIC SCALE ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 30 ft. z 0 Ui ~ 0:: ci z 0 z 0:: ;: 0 ··omo:: ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 u PROJECT NO. 2151007.00 GR ' ' I ' ' ' I ' ' ' J ' ' ' ) ' ' ' )> 0 ____. 0 ' , , , ' ' / , ' I ' ' l , J ' , ' \ I I I \ ' I I \ ' ' , \ ' I I ) I ) I I ' I ' ' ' I ' ' ' J zm ()) 0 ~~ O" OJ 0 -:::l Q_A (Q I f'1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I /I I I I , I I I I f'1 I I I I 069S I FUSE '1t•« ure + PO Bex 452<; ~a•alt c CJ Ill t-21 970618'>8"-l r Jlapo1nte<<"1fuseacs col"' I I I 111 I f' I I 1 ! I I I I I I I I I '"1 I I I I I I I I I 1 i I I I I I / I I I : I I 11 \ \ I \'1 \ \!'1\\ \ \ \ \ Number l 2 '~· rn • 8 Land Use Review 1111 II II I I ~ ~·· 05.09.201 6 I \ I \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ~ / I NORTH \ \ \ EASTBANK, LLC – VETERINARY CLINIC APPLICATION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW IMPACT ANALYSIS (4-203(G)) 1. Adjacent Property. Attached is a list of property owners adjacent to the parcel. 2. Mineral Owners Attached is a list of mineral owners. 3. Adjacent Land Use Attached is an aerial photograph which shows adjacent land uses within a 1,500 foot radius of the subject property. The most proximate users are light industrial to industrial, including the new Fed Ex warehouse and distribution facility, and a contractor’s yard. The RE-1 School District is building a new K- 8 school approximately a half mile away. Land uses across the Roaring Fork River are residential. The proposed land use is much less intense than the historic character of the property (i.e. gravel pi t) and is compatible with the light industrial uses currently occurring on adjacent parcels. 4. Site Features The site is generally dominated by a series of relatively flat terraces situated at a prominent bend in the Roaring Fork River on the site of an old gravel pit. This property, specifically, has operated as a heavy industrial use since 1950 and is currently a recognized industrial nonconforming use with Garfield County for a recycling transloading and associating industrial uses. The proposed land use would replace this industrial use. The new land use is much less intense than the current nonconforming InterMountain Waste operation on the property. Given its history of industrial use, the property is not in its native condition. Specifically, ther e is no vegetation in the areas the proposed development will occupy, including a new building for a veterinary clinic and restoration of the existing building for a vehicle repair shop. The property is terraced as it moves south towards the river, and is characteristic of such terraces in the Roaring Fork Valley. Outside of the bare areas on which the current waste operation is continuing, the vegetation is disturbed and sparse with large areas of bare soil. The slopes between the terraces appear to be the most intact plant communities, and may be the remnants of the vegetation that once dominated the site. However, given the site’s use as a gravel pit in the past, it is difficult to determine whether these plant communities are native. In any event, the proposed development will not disturb vegetation outside the currently bare areas, except to connect to utilities as set forth in the Water and Wastewater plans. Any disturbed areas for this purpose will be remediated to County standards. There is no risk of flooding on the property, and there are no streams or bodies of water on or adjacent to the upper bench of the property. 5. Soil Characteristics Attached is a geotechnical investigation completed by HP-Geotech dated May 5, 2016. The investigation provides recommendations on proposed construction and subsurface conditions. There are no adverse soil characteristics that would make the project infeasible, and that all potential impacts can be mitigated with good engineering and construction practices. 6. Geology and Hazard. Attached is a geotechnical investigation completed by HP-Geotech dated May 5, 2016. There are no significant geological hazards that would make the project infeasible, and all potential impacts can be mitigated with good engineering and construction practices. Additionally, the attached maps depict hazard data obtained from Garfield County GIS website. The project lies outside identified slop, soils, and surficial hazard areas as well as septic system constraints. 7. Groundwater and Aquifer Recharge Areas There are no groundwater or aquifer recharge areas on the portion of the site proposed for development. 8. Environmental Impacts All development associated with the application will occur within the existing InterMountain Waste site, which is heavily disturbed. There is little or no vegetation within this area, and therefore no impact on flora or fauna. There is no critical wildlife habitat within this area, given its use as a heavy industrial operation since at least 1950. For general ecological information, planning staff may refer to the Ecological Assessment of Eastbank Proeprty for Minor Subdivision and Major Impact Review dated February 18, 2015 by Colorado Wildlife Science, LLC in association with Fed Ex’s application on the adjacent parcel (Permit No. MIPA-03-15-8260), which analyzed the adjacent parcel. Note, however, that the Fed Ex parcel was disturbing existing vegetation whereas this application is utilizing the already heavily disturbed industrial site which would be vacated by InterMountain Waste. 9. Nuisance As stated above, all operations will occur within the building and no noises will emanate from the property. Any manure from outdoor activities will be disposed of on a regular basis such that no odors will emanate from the property. 10. Hours of Operation. The veterinary clinic will operate during normal business hours (8-6 M–S), and for emergency calls when necessary. ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS 2185-353-15-003 Eastbank LLC 710 E. Durant Avenue, Unit W6 Aspen, CO 81611 2185-353-00-060 Roaring Fork RE-1 School District 1521 Grand Avenue Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 2185-353-15-001 KW Glenwood Springs LLC P.O. Box 979 Telluride, CO 81435 2185-354-23-007 Blue Heron Properties LLC 1007 Westbank Road Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 2185-353-04-002 Robert Duncan MacGregor 710 East Durant Avenue, Unit W-6 Aspen, CO 81611 2185-354-00-017 James L. Rose P.O. Box 432 Rifle, CO 81650-0432 2185-354-00-024 Shane & Bruce’s LLC 4185 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Colorado Department of Transportation 202 Centennial Drive Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 MINERAL OWNERS Eastbank, LLC 710 E. Durant Avenue, Unit W6 Aspen, CO 81611 Garfield County, CODate Printed: May 3, 2016 This map is for illustrative purposes only and does not represent a survey. It is provided 'as is' without warranty orany representation of accuracy, timeliness or completeness. The user acknowledges and accepts all inherentlimitations of the maps and data, including the fact that the maps and data are dynamic and in a constant state ofrevision, maintenance, and correction. No liability is assumed by Garfield County as to the accuracy of the datadelineated herein. 0 200 400 600 800 1000 Feet HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL May 5, 2016 Eastbank, LLC Attn: Robert MacGregor 710 East Durant A venue Aspen, Colorado 81611 rmac@dunrene.com Hcpworch-Pawbk Geotcchnic.1!, Inc. 5020 County Road I 54 GlmwooJ Springs, Colorado 81601 Phone: 970-945-7988 fox : 970-945-8454 cm,ul: hpgco@hpgcotcch com Job No.116 128A Subject: Subsoil Study for Foundation Design, Proposed Equine Surgery Center, 3929 County Road 154, Garfield County, Colorado Dear Mr. MacGregor: As requested, Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. performed a subsoil study for design of foundations at the subject site. The study was conducted in accordance with our agreement for geotechnical engineering services to Eastbank, LLC dated April 20, 2016. The data obtained and our recommendations based on the proposed construction and subsurface conditions encountered are presented in this report. Proposed Construction: The proposed building will be a single story steel frame/metal skin structure with a slab-on-grade floor. The building footprint will be about 5,000 square feet and will be located on the site as shown on Figure l. Cut depths are expected to range between about 3 to 4 feet. Foundation loadings for this type of construction are assumed to be relatively light for walls and moderate for column pads, typical of the proposed type of construction. If building conditions or foundation loadings are significantly different from those described above, we should be notified to re-evaluate the recommendations presented in this report. Site Conditions: The site is currently a gravel surfaced storage yard for a trash hauling business. The ground surface slopes gently down to the south-southeast in the building area. Directly southwest of the proposed building the ground surface drops off steeply down toward the Roaring Fork River located well below the building site. The hillside is vegetated with sage brush and weeds. Fill has been previously placed in the building area. Subsurface Conditions: The subsurface conditions at the site were evaluated by excavating five exploratory pits at the approximate locations shown on Figure 1. The logs of the pits are presented on Figure 2. The subsoils encountered, below about 1 Yi to 3 feet of fill, consist of about 2Y2 feet of stiff sandy silty clay in Pits 1 and 2 overlying Parker 303-841-7119 • Colorado Springs 719-633-5562 • Silverthorne 970-468-1989 -2 - relatively dense, slightly silty to silty sandy gravel with cobbles and small boulders. The clay was not encountered in Pits 3 to 5. The fill consisted of mainly road base at Pits l and 2 and miscellaneous soils with organics at Pits 3 to 5. Results of swell-consolidation testing performed on a relatively undisturbed sample of the sandy silty clay, presented on Figure 3, indicate low compressibility under existing moisture conditions and light loading and a minor collapse potential (settlement under constant load) when wetted. The clay sample showed moderate to high compressibility under increased loading after wetting. Results of gradation analyses performed on samples of the underlying gravel soils (minus 3 to 5 inch fraction) obtained from the site are presented on Figure 4. No free water was observed in the pits at the time of excavation and the soils were slightly moist to moist. Foundation Recommendations: Considering the subsoil conditions encountered in the exploratory pits and the nature of the proposed construction, we recommend spread footings placed on the undisturbed natural gravel soils or a limited depth of structural fill designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of 3,000 psf for support of the proposed building. The clay soils tend to compress after wetting which could result in some post- construction foundation settlement and we recommend that the clay be removed from below all footing areas. Footings should be a minimum width of 16 inches for continuous walls and 2 feet for columns. Loose disturbed soils, existing fill and clay soils encountered at the foundation bearing level within the excavation should be removed and the footing bearing level extended down to the undisturbed natural soils. As an alternative, design footing grade could be re-established with structural fill consisting of imported COOT Class 6 Road base compacted to at least 100% of the maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. The structural fill placed below footings should be limited to 18 inches in depth. Exterior footings should be provided with adequate cover above their bearing elevations for frost protection. Placement of footings at least 36 inches below the exterior grade is typically used in this area. Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span local anomalies such as by assuming an unsupported length of at least IO feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining structures (if any) should be designed to resist a lateral earth pressure based on an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 50 pcf for the on-site soil as backfill, excluding organics and rocks larger than about 6 inches. Floor Slabs: The natural on-site soils, exclusive of fill, are suitable to support lightly slab-on-grade construction. It may be possible to leave the existing road base fill encountered in Pits l and 2 in place under the slab-on-grade areas. This can be further evaluated at the time of footing excavation. To reduce the effects of some differential movement, floor slabs should be separated from all bearing walls and columns with expansion joints which allow unrestrained vertical movement. Floor slab control joints should be used to reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking. The requirements for joint spacing and slab reinforcement should be established by the designer based on experience and the intended slab use. A minimum 4 inch layer of free-draining gravel should be Job No.116 128A -3 - placed beneath slabs. This material should consist of minus 2 inch aggregate with less than 50% passing the No. 4 sieve and less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve. AH fill materials for support of floor slabs should be compacted to at least 95% of maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Required fill can consist of imported COOT Class 6 road base or other well graded granular soils devoid of vegetation, topsoil and oversized rock. Underdrain System: An underdrain system should not be needed for the proposed slab- on-grade building. Surface Drainage: The following drainage precautions should be observed during construction and maintained at all times after the building has been completed: 1) Inundation of the foundation excavations and underslab areas should be avoided during construction. 2) Exterior bac kfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density in pavement and slab areas and to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density in landscape areas. Exterior wall backfill should be compacted to reduce surface water infiltration. 3) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions. We recommend a minimum slope of 12 inches in the first 10 feet in unpaved areas and a minimum slope of 2V2 inches in the first 10 feet in pavement and walkway areas. 4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill. Limitations: This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no warranty either express or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the exploratory pits excavated at the locations indicated on Figure l and to the depths shown on Figure 2, the proposed type of construction, and our experience in the area. Our services do not include determining the presence, prevention or possibility of mold or other biological contaminants (MOBC) developing in the future. If the client is concerned about MOBC, then a professional in this special field of practice should be consulted. Our findings include interpolation and extrapolation of the subsurface conditions identified at the exploratory pits and variations in the subsurface conditions may not become evident until excavation is performed. If conditions encountered during construction appear different from those described in this report, we should be notified al once so re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made. Job No .116 128A This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes. We are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. As the project evolves, we should provide continued consultation and field services during construction to review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations, and to verify that the recommendations have been appropriately interpreted. Significant design changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommendations presented herein. We recommend on-site observation of excavations and foundation bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a representative of the geotechnical engineer. If you have any questions or if we may be of further assistance, please let us know . Respectfully Submitted, Rev. by: SLP DEH/ksw attachments Figure 1 -Location of Exploratory Pits Figure 2 -Logs of Exploratory Pits Figure 3 -Swell-Consolidation Test Results Figure 4 -Gradation Test Results Table I -Summary of Laboratory Test Results cc: High Country Engineering -Attn: Roger Neal rneal@hceng.com FUSE Architecture+ Construction -Attn: Bruce Upton bu pton@fuseacs.com Job No . 116 128A 116 128A PITS EXISTING DRIVE PIT1 • PROPOSED • PIT 4 BUILD JNG APPROXIMATE SCALE 1".,.... 60' ~ HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL. PROPOSED DRIVE LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY PITS Figure 1 Qj QI u. .s:: .... C1 QI 0 0 5 10 LEGEND . PIT 1 ELEV .= 5948' WC =19 .4 DD c 92 PIT2 ELEV.= 5946' I +4.,,71 -.J -200 =12 PIT 3 PIT 4 PITS ELEV -5948 ELEV.::: 5948' ELEV. -5849' 0 . 5 I +4•63 -.J -200 =6 10 FILL; mostly roadbase in Pits 1 and 2 . Combination or clayey sand with organics , reddish brown clayey sandy gravel , and miscellaneous soils , lo ose, sligh tly moist to moi st. multi-colored . CLAY (Cl); silty, sandy, stiff , sl ightly moist to moist, red . GRAVEL (GM-GP); sandy , silly, with cobbles and sma ll bou tders, medium dense to dense , and redd fsh brown in upper 1 to 2 feet. Deep er grav el soils are slightly snty and light brown ~ 2 ' Diameter hand driven liner sample . ~ -: Disturbed bulk sample . ~ -.J NOTES 1. Exploratory pits were excavated on April 20 , 2016 with a backhoe . 2 . Locations of exploratory pits were measured approximately by pacing from features shown on the site plan provided . 3 . Elevations of exploratory pits were obtained by interpolation between contours shown on the site plan provided and checked by instrument level. 4 . The exploratory pit locations and elevations should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used 5 . The lines between materials shown on the exploratory pit logs represent the approximate boundar ies between material types and transitions may be gradua l. 6 . No rree water was encountered in the pits at the time of excavating . Fluctuation in water level may occur with time . 7. Laboratory Testing Results : WC = Water Content (%) DD = Dry Density (pc0 + 4 """ Percent retained on the No . 4 sieve -200 = Percent passing the No 200 sieve Qj if .c. a Q) Cl 116 128A ~ LOGS OF EXPLORATORY PITS Figure 2 HEPWORTH•PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL. Moisture Content = 19.4 percent Dry Density .,. 92 pcf Sample of: Sandy Silty Clay From: Pit 1 at 2 Feet 0 -..._ -·n 1 " '\ <:: l-...... Compression -~upon (fl. 2 wetting c:: \ § .Ci) Ul 3 (1) ... I\ a. E 0 () 4 ' 5 \ \ 6 \ 7 \ llJ 8 0 .1 1.0 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE -ksf 116 128A ~ Hecworth-Powlak Geoledmlcal SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Figure 3 0 w z ~ a: I-z w (.) a: LU Cl. HYDROMETER ANALYSIS SIEVE ANALYSIS I TIME READINGS t U .S STANDARD SERIES I CLEAR SQUARE OPENINGS I 2•:fA 7kR 45 IN. 15 MIN. 60MIN19MIN.4 MIN. 1 MIN #200 #100 #50 130 116 10 #4 3/8' 3/4' 1 1/2" 3' 5'6' 0· 0 10 20 30 . 40 50 - 60 70 80 90 100 .DOI .002 005 009 01!1 .037 .01• 150 .300 .&10 I ti 2315 U~ 95 lZS 190 175 7112 152 20:I 127 DIAMETER OF PARTICLES IN MILLIMETERS C~YIOSU :1---=F•""1E:----.,..---SAl'""'Mt""~""v~.,..., -.,.,. COARSE==--:---..F.--•E:--=CRA-...VE=L....._,,co""'ARS=""E ---t: COBBlES GRAVEL 71 % SAND 17 % SAMPLE OF: Silty Sandy Gravel with Cobbles SILT AND CLAY 12 % FROM: Pit 2 at 4 to 5 Feet HYDROMETER ANALYSIS SIEVE ANALYSIS 7 HA TIME READINGS I US. STANDARD SERIES I CLEAR SQUARE OPENINGS I t:x'I 80 (!) 70 z Ci5 en <t 00 Cl. I- 1() z w (.) •O a: w Cl. 38 2t: 10 0 24 -IR . 3/8' 314• 1 1/2' 3' 5'6' 8' 65 JllN 15 MIN . 60MIN19MIN 4 M.N . 1 MIN. #200 #100 #50 #30 #16 #8 #4 100 10 0 20 w z 30 ~ a: 40 ~ 50 w ~ 60 w Cl. 70 80 90 100 : 90 BO (.!J 70 z Ci5 en 60 ~ 1- 50 z LU 0 40 a: w Cl. 30 20 10 0 001 .002 005 .009 019 .03 7 .074 .150 300 .600 1 18 2 36 4 75 9 512 519 0 37.5 76.2 12~52 203 DIAMETER OF PARTICLES IN Mill METERS Cl.>1 10$1. r I MH ll\JM 1 ou>e~ I GRAVEL 63 % SAND 31 % SILT AND CLAY 6 % SAMPLE OF: Slightly Silty Sandy Gravel FROM : Pit 4 at 5 to 6 Feet 116 128A ~ GRADATION TEST RESULTS Figure 4 HEPWORTH-PA~K GEOTEC:HNIC:Al. HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. TABLE 1 Job No. 116128A SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS SAMPLE LOCATION NATURAL NATURAL GRADATION A TTERBERG LIMITS UNCONFINED PERCENT MOISTURE DRY GRAVEL SAND PASSING LIQUID PLASTIC COMPRESSIVE SOIL OR PIT DEPTH CONTENT DENSITY NO. 200 LIMIT INDEX STRENGTH BEDROCK TYPE (%) (%) SIEVE (fl) (%\ (DCfl (%) (%) (PSF) l 2 19.4 92 Sandy Silty Clay 2 4 to 5 71 17 12 Silty Sandy Gravel with Cobbles 4 5 to 6 63 31 6 Slightly Silty Sandy Gravel APPENDIX – Hazard Maps -.. --• • » _:o;::. -_____ -:; _--,...): ' ~ . ~· ' • \ • • • ' .. • ---- "OOltl l ' ' I , ":~:· • I • -----=-· "::"S'"" • .. " " • -=:-.:- ~!r:.-'""'"-r. .-=.. ·- ---· ---·--- Septic System Constraints, Garfield County, Colorado ' 2 J •-ic:=•---"'"'~ t i.?Ch eq usi's 3.4 mile s 'JUT.IC 9.VSTElll C'Oll1TAA.t 4T't $01.RCE. ') •1 ;..,l'>!)f" I ,_.., •• 11,.ffftt '""'"' ·:-1, ''"°"".1-.<l),o,..,,._ I •<I I>~ 1..1:<.o ""'"·•• .v .... :J .o Jo.· II<• ...,..._..--.,.,,,.,111 ., o. ...... w .;.,.~• s .... 1 c1 ,n.;~ Septi c System Constraints -High Watar Table -Sfo,,,. Pere Rate -Sotimon t:vaporire Mn ef9is •••-•• Exten t of Geolo;:jc Study .... t.. .. ,..,.-~-"''-~'""• """'""'' -.~--"· ..... ~ J.V .,,.,.,..,Yl'#>• Wtf/Wt U ,,,,, .... ~ -... :.n.w I'. t:t "t-V-.. ;~ tt.%", :..=;;~';·:-::.=. "?:;~~='?i' .. ~ 'i.~Z 1-••• ,,,~...,,C .. k••I -~ ,.,.,._,;Cf'.u. """'' "S"lll><W,. ,,. ......... u ..... ,. .... "~·"' \ .. ,"'~~ ....... .. "-t ......... "' 011 .... ,. .... ~ .u·.t~ v .... ,_ ........... ,,_, -~··~ ... ..,.,_,,,,..,.., ....... ~, .................. -................ .,,. O(~)'\:r~~ ... -. °ti> M'¥11. .. Y.-.IWl~Tt M>t"''"I" .¥.~t:h.'nl n ,,_....,"'I'<' W ..,,,_.,.,.,..,,*"' .. ,:,•t •1Cw t10•.ln .. ,.,. >•~» ~ ,.,_1><) :o _, .. ~t" ...... "6,.,_. ... ,_ ... ~_ .. __ ......... .. _ ......... _ ..... l')l:<•<v#-t .cl_,.. ~"'9,,,,__ .,,...., "'"" '"' • "'~ lu• <;,,.v,.'• ,.,._,u, "'"~ •II.>•>"" Slope Hazard Study Areas 1, 2, & 3, Garfield County, Colorado ':.' _.:..,_._ ___ ._ E~t(Nllf)' --··-.. ·-·•· • Legend Slope HaZSird ~ ~llJOR .. \i 0 0 =R4-F ••••••• S ite Soil Hazar d Profile, Study A r eas 1 ,2, & 3, Garfield County, Colorado ll : .. il•••iiiiii••••••••"'llc~ r.·c,,,\~·• .... ·:."""'"''"'"' ~ .. ,-.u"'"'':""' «tn •'J I .'Ill ,......... pow~,,..t ••:'tt I "" '" """.1 • .,,.~ 1 't" : M<W< :..-:\'ri'. ~IJ'.'t'> •l'A~? ~•1. Legend SOI Hazard .. CC .i\l l•lltl C .. r.1;.Jor<. .. f,iO O E P.1\TE --· r1'Ch-.nf ::.f (;~!D.J (°. !1t u.-Jy ""'' ......... ...... ... -··· ........ ····-·--····•·•-k .. •• ····-.O\ _,, .... ,..,,,.,,,.,,,,..,,,.,,. .. I U••:O> ,.,,,.," '" ....... ,. ............... ,,, __ .. .-.................. . .. ., ..... '"' ............... ,, ................... ,, ......... , °""'....-. •'• C. ~. C"t '" '><• 1-T .:rt:o. 1•0 -..,.,,..,,Cl"' ... " l>•J',• ....... ,, ........ ' . . . ........... ~ .. .... . . . .. . ... .. .... . ......... ._ ........... ._ .... " ..... ~ .......... , ........ : ... ,. .._ ................. '''•••"'•'''•"'"'""-.......... ~.AO '""'' ...... .. t?.. ...... ,,,......-....... w ........... , ...... , ... -.... ,.,.""' ,., .... , .......... ~ ........ , .... ,, ......... , ,,,.,..., .. " .... ,.,o.-.v. '~ ><.alf~·A"V "''~£.'·"'""~'"'-.1.<•11•J ~·.-.• u.,...,.,.,,._ ...... ·~ ............. _ .. -·"'. ' ..... , ..... ., ......... . IWYl)/K .... ,,,.~ ~~-~·T ..... , .... \ J~W .... '° "'\_<_ .... Sit.: Surfl clal Geology, Garfield County, Col ora do ' ' ·--===·----V··'< :~"' 1•;1,\ • l t<ll n•:. i;c:• 1~: 1J '{"""'lo);ilt 1-~~!\IS (lett!)(W.A~<lt ,IJll((ll\<)~~~ t~~I ~ IAl>:rl.l!J'Y,'°'(1111""' It>!" r e 1.<!ICl'\h~11U1to:: ~!ACltll» 6'l~<oi! :h .. -,·;11•."· ''" ··--·< .. , .. _ ....... _,.,., ~-.. ,,,.,...,_, ,,,_,,, ...... .' ll_,,.,.,.,.,,._.,..\,..,.;11,,.,...,,.,, """"'"' 11 ,.-.1 ~-t,1 r ,,~ ' I SUrllclal Geology .. r;.,1>1 .. LAMDSLI OE -MUC<LOW .. t.IUL:l-L<J~'l't."t.I L:t •••-EY.t~nl o f Geelo;i e ~u:fy llt<. ·1 twr~1 1'1• .... -l"t:IV.-:lv ~1r:..r1 ~---~·""' ... . ...... ,, ,.,, .... 0:0: ...... 1 .. ., 11.::11 :. ..... ,;~ ... u: ~" 0 .... ~ .. . ... ............ ~. , ...... ~ .... ,, ..... , ....... ~ ... -.......... , tc u:: ..... 1 •~•"·"'" ,.. .. , 1 .. , .. .,"". '"~ •••"'-""ll""• .... ,.,, i::::.".',t~~~ .. ~~ma~·~I\':":.;;:~~~ ............. ~_ ... , .......... , .................................... , ... .... .. 'l:t\.~\ 'N l<;':,J , ').J },>( .. •('.I '~ UI ..,.., -·1ti»;t ""-W II J\ '"fl ~.-,.,...,,.11 ... 1.-.-.,,.,.,._..n•I>*•,.,.... ......... ~ ....... r.-· ·~"'"""""'-·"' ...... ~ . ...-: ... .... ~ .. / .. "'1 0 .... ___ L..,,~,,....f<ll:rW __ .... ...,. ........ ,. ........... -" .. ,, .......... _ .... ,,.,.., ........ ....,i, '*'""""" -..... ,_.,.,... .......... ••fl ••"'·-"'" .... _ Site TRAFFIC REPORT FOR LOT 2 EASTBANK MINOR SUBDIVISION EASTBANK EQUINE HOSPITAL AND PROFESSIONAL DIESEL AND AUTOMOTIVE GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO PREPARED FOR: Eastbank, LLC 710 East Durant Avenue, W-6 Aspen, CO 81611 PREPARED BY: High Country Engineering, Inc. 1517 Blake Avenue, Suite 101 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 (970) 945-8676 May 10th, 2016 HCE JOB NUMBER: 2151007.00 Page 2 j:/sdskproj/215/1007/word/Traffic Impact Report TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE I. S I T E L O C A T I O N 3 II. DESCRIPTION OF SITE 3 III. EXISTING ACCESS 3 IV. EXISTING TRAFFIC GENERATION 4 V. PROPOSED TRAFFIC GENERATION 4 VI. PARKING REQUIREMENTS 5 V I I . C O N C L U S I O N S 6 VIII. REFERENCES 7 EXHIBITS: 1. Vicinity Map (8.5” x 11”) 2. Parking Plan Page 3 j:/sdskproj/215/1007/word/Traffic Impact Report I. Site Location The site (a portion of Lot 2 Eastbank Minor Subdivision) is located in Section 35 of Township 6 South, Range 89 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, Garfield County Colorado. The project is bounded to the on the south by private property and the Roaring Fork River, on the northeast be County Road 154, and to the northwest by a FedEx Ground facility (Lot 1 Eastbank) and the new access to road to County Road 154. State Highway 82 is located adjacent to County Road 154 to the northeast. County Road 154 intersects with State Highway 82 approximately 800-ft north of the property. II. Description of Property The 16.983-acre Lot 2 Eastbank Minor Subdivision parcel is a property with several existing buildings including a 3,900 square-foot building currently leased to waste management service company. This existing structure includes a second floor in a portion of the structure. The primitive/driveway on the southeast corner of Lot 2 will remain in place and serve the small existing building that is used by the owner of Lot 2 as an office as well as a portion of land leased by Gould Construction for storing equipment and materials. The southeast access is not affected by the proposed project and the trips generated from this side of Lot 2 onto County Road 154 will remain unchanged by the proposed improvements. This traffic study will cover the application for the proposed 4,400 SF building to be Eastbank Equine Hospital as well as the renovation and expansion of the existing building currently leased to Intermountain Waste and Recycling. This existing building will be expanded to approximately 5,050 square feet and will be headquarters for Professional Diesel and Automotive following the renovation. The upper Lot 2 area will be a large open gravel area with low to moderate slopes that will provide flexibility for the circulation of vehicles and abundant room for short term and long term parking. III. Existing Access These two businesses will be accessed via the improved access off County Road 154 recently constructed as part of the FedEx Ground Facility to the northwest occupying Lot 1 of the Eastbank Minor Subdivision. The access is 30’ wide and has been designed to accommodate WB-67D trucks (double bottom combination trucks) with a total length of 73.3 feet used by the FedEx operation. This access is sized properly to accommodate horse trailers that will utilize the access for the equine hospital. The Lot 2 access onto the shared driveway with Lot 1 (FedEx Ground) is over 100 feet from the intersection of County Road 154. This provides room for the proposed Lot 2 traffic to straighten out prior to reaching the intersection of County Road 154 and also provides room for stacking of at least one of the large FedEx WB- 67D trucks so that the Lot 2 access is not blocked. Page 4 j:/sdskproj/215/1007/word/Traffic Impact Report A secondary access will remain in place to the east of the proposed buildings. This access will be eliminated once the access to a new public school site is constructed, at which point a secondary access point to the two proposed businesses will be provided from this future road. This road will eventually serve up to two public schools and future residential development. For the purposes of this traffic study, we will assume that this secondary access will not handle any of the proposed trips generated by the two businesses. 100% of the trips generated will access from the shared driveway with FedEx Ground on Lot 1. IV. Existing Traffic Generation The existing 4000 square foot waste management facility is used for overnight storage of covered waste containers till they can be transferred to a local landfill the following day. The recycled materials are sorted to be taken to a processing facility offsite. The site is closed to the public so the traffic is limited to employees, limited customer/vendor traffic, and truck traffic to and from the site. The applicant was provided typical traffic according to the staff in charge of daily operations for Intermountain Waste and Recycling. The site receives an average weekday total of 140 truck trips per weekday, 30 employee vehicle trips, and 20 customer/vendor trips. A majority of these trips will also be heavy trucks which have a greater impact to the surrounding road network than the more typical composite of vehicles proposed for the two proposed businesses Using a passenger car equivalency of 2 for each garbage truck, the total existing trips for this portion of Lot 2 is equal to 330 trips. V. Proposed Traffic Generation Eastbank Equine Hospital The proposed 4,400 square foot equine hospital facility will be in operation from 8AM-5PM Monday through Friday. The operators expect to see a maximum of 12 customer visits in an average week (up to seven visits during a busy day). The business will require up to 6 full time employees once the business is at the full buildout. There will also be approximately 1 delivery to the site each weekday. This type of facility does not fit the typical parameters for a medical facility for trips per 1000 square foot of gross floor area or number of employees so the ITE Trip Generation manual was not referenced. We estimate that only half the employees would travel into Glenwood or Carbondale to run errands or have lunch and that each employee has their own vehicle. This equates to 18 trips per weekday from employees. The daily delivery will add an additional 2 trips per day. The customers will generate 14 trips. This brings the total average daily traffic (ADT) trips during a busy weekday to 34 trips. Professional Diesel and Automotive Page 5 j:/sdskproj/215/1007/word/Traffic Impact Report The proposed 4720 square foot auto repair shop will be in operation from 8AM-5PM Monday through Friday. The operator of the proposed business expects to see a maximum of 20 customer visits in an average week (10 customer visits during a particularly busy business day). There will be up to 5 employees and we estimate that all would have their own vehicles and 3 would make a trip offsite during the day. This brings the ADT during a busy weekday to 42 trips based on the operator’s historic data. The calculation based on the ITE Trip Generation manual for an automobile care center business with approximately 5,050 square feet is 20 trips during the peak hour. The AASHTO “A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets” suggests, in section 2-49, that on a typical rural arterial that peak hour traffic is about 25% of the Average Daily Traffic (ADT). This calculates out to an ADT of 80 trips over an entire weekday. In order to be conservative in the proposed traffic generation and its effects on the local street network, we will assume that 80 trips will be required on an average weekday. Total Proposed Trip Generation The total estimate average daily traffic for the two proposed business is 122 trips during a busy day for both businesses. This is approximately a 63% reduction in average daily traffic for the two proposed businesses compared to the existing commercial operations. VI. Off-Street Parking Eastbank Equine Hospital The Garfield County Land Use and Development Code has standards for parking requirements for “retail, service, or office” commercial uses of 1 parking space per 250 SF of leasable floor area. This will be used for the typical office portions of the building. There is not a good reference for animal medical facilities in the County Code. However, the City of Glenwood Springs Municipal Code has a category for “general service establishment not otherwise listed” which provides requirement of 1 parking space per 450 square feet of floor area. The office and reception portions of the proposed equine hospital account for approximately 1,560 square feet of the building. 1,560 SF /250 = 6.24 spaces The surgery area portion of the building accounts for 800 square feet. 800 SF/450 = 1.78 spaces The rest of the building is just in-doors holding areas for animals which would not generate any parking requirements. This makes for a need for a minimum of 8 parking spaces of which 1 will need to be a handicap accessible space. Page 6 j:/sdskproj/215/1007/word/Traffic Impact Report Exhibit 2 reflects these spaces as well as an area for horse trailers. Professional Diesel and Automotive The Garfield County Land Use and Development Code does not have a good match for the proposed use of automotive repair. For the portion of the building with office space, the estimate of 1 parking space per 250 SF of leasable floor space will be used. The City of Glenwood Springs Municipal Code has a category for “vehicle service station” which provides requirement of 3 parking space per service bay (excluding the bay itself). This will be used for the rest of the building which includes 4 service bays. The office and reception portions of the proposed auto repair facility accounts for approximately 1,850 square feet of the building. 1,850 SF /250 = 7.40 spaces The 4 bay service area accounts for the balance of the building. 4 Bays x 3 = 12.00 spaces This makes for a need for a minimum of 18 parking spaces of which 1 will need to be a handicap accessible space. VII. Conclusions The proposed uses on Lot 2 Eastbank Minor Subdivision will produce a reduction in the overall traffic generation onto the surrounding road network. The access driveway constructed as part of the Lot 1 development is sized to handle large semitrailer trucks and the proposed Lot 2 access point off this shared driveway is far from the County Road to provide for stacking and allow large vehicles length to straighten out within the shared access road before reaching the intersection of the County Road 154. The upper portion of Lot 2 provides more than enough space for parking for the proposed uses. This traffic analysis will need to be reviewed if the site operations are expanded in the future or if additional commercial uses are added to Lot 2. VIII. References Rich Engineering Company, “Federal Express Ground Distribution Facility Traffic Impact Page 7 j:/sdskproj/215/1007/word/Traffic Impact Report Analysis Garfield County”, March 6th, 2015 AASHTO “A policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, 2011, 6th addition” Greenbook Institute of Transpiration Engineers, Trip Generation Manual, 6th Edition Garfield County “Land Use and Development Code, Amended December 17, 2015” City of Glenwood Springs “Municipal Code, September 17, 2015” • HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC. 1•17-.m:AVINUC,sm 101, llU!NWOCID8PIUIDll,C0818DI PHONE ~9111179 •AX (8'10)9··- WWW.HCllNQ,COM EASTBANIC, UC DRAWNllY: GARFIELD COUNTY, CO '"""===DR~D--~==iv_•_IOOCI _ ____. CHllCICllD B'I: l'RO.IEICrNO: SCALI!: EA1111ANJCIQlllNIH01Pn'~,___RDN _____ 2_i5_1007 _ ____. DATIC PAall: IHC>UI LOT 1 \ (F EX GROU ND FAC ILITY) \ ) PR IMARY ACC ESS FOR LOT 2 LOT2 GR AP H IC SCA LE / / ,./' / / / / 50 0 25 50 1 00 200 c:~•·::i•••=--1-1--1----•I ( IN F EET ) 1 inch = 5 0 ft. LE GE ND I I ~ -I···:•; .. 4 H·l S ~C;,O~DARY ACC ES S TO BE :(R EMQ~ED WITH FUTU RE SC HOO L ACCE SS CONS TRUCTION EXISTI NG AS PH ALT PAVING PROPOS ED BU ILDIN G EXISTI NG BU IL DING PROPOS ED GR A VE L CONCR ETE z 0 ii! ~ 2Ul1007 2 Basalt Office: Glenwood Springs Office: Aspen Office: 211 Midland Avenue, Ste. 201 818 Colorado Avenue 0133 Prospector Road, Ste. 4102E Basalt, CO 81621 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Aspen, CO 81611 P.O. Box 790, Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 • (970) 945-6546 • www.balcombgreen.com Sara M. Dunn Direct Dial (970) 928-3467 Receptionist (970) 945-6546 sarad@balcombgreen.com May 13, 2016 Ms. Tamra Allen, Acting Director Community Development 108 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 RE: Water Supply Lot 2, Eastbank, LLC Minor Subdivision Dear Tamra: This letter summarizes the details of the water supply for Lot 2, of the Eastbank, LLC Minor Subdivision. All the uses on Lot 2 will be served by the existing well pursuant to the terms of a well sharing agreement and individual well permits. Water delivery to each facility will be separately metered to ensure compliance with the individual well permits. The car repair facility that will occupy the existing approximately 4,000 square foot building will be served pursuant to Well Permit No. 05023-F and Basalt Water Conservancy District Contract #312. Well Permit No. 05023-F was issued July 8, 1998 pursuant to C.R.S. § 37-90-137(2) and the uses are limited to drinking and sanitary purposes inside a 4,000 square foot office/repair shop building, occasional truck washing and floor washing, and not more than 1,000 square feet of landscaping irrigation. A copy is attached hereto. This well permit requires a valid contract (Contract #312) with the Basalt Water Conservancy District. According to the Basalt Water Conservancy District, Contract #312 is in full force and effect. The Equine Hospital will be served by the same well that serves the car repair facility. Eastbank, LLC has applied to the Basalt Water Conservancy District for an allotment contract and inclusion in its umbrella plan for augmentation adjudicated in Case No. 02CW77. A copy of the Application for Water Allotment Contract submitted by Eastbank, LLC to the Basalt Water Conservancy District is attached hereto. We anticipate that the Basalt Water Conservancy District will approve this request and issue a contract within the next 60 days. Once the Basalt Water Conservancy District contract has been issued, Eastbank, LLC will obtain a well permit for the uses associated with the Equine Hospital. We will supplement the Application with the Basalt Water Conservancy District contract, well permit, and well sharing agreement upon receipt. Ms. Tamra Allen May 13, 2016 Page 2 of 2 A water quality test was performed on the well on September 29, 2015 and it tested negative for Coliform and E.coli. The results of that test are attached hereto. The most recent well production pump test was performed on March 2, 2015. Over the 4-hour pumping period approximately 4,800 gallons were pumped, resulting in an average pumping rate of 20 g.p.m. A copy of the Well Pumping Test Results Letter from Resource Engineering, Inc. is also attached hereto. Please do not hesitate to call if you have any questions. Very truly yours, BALCOMB & GREEN, P.C. By: Sa r a M . D u n n ------------------------------------· - ;.; ··Forni No._ Gws:2s ., .. APPLICANT OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER COLORADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 816 Centennial Bldg., 1313 Sherman St., Denver, Colorado 60203 (303) 656-3581 WELL PERMIT NUMBER 050236 --------- DIV. 5 CNTY. 23 WD 38 DES. BASIN Lot: Bloek: Filing: Subdiv: APPROVED WELL LOCATION GARFIELD COUNTY LIC -E__-_ MD JOE & GERALDINE JAMMARON BOX 1631 NW 1/4 Twp BS SE 1/4 Section 35 RANGE 89 W 6th P.M, GLENWOOD SPRING CO 81602· DISTANCES FROM SECTION LINES (970)945-2554 1700 Ft. from 1950 Ft. from South Section Line East PERMIT TO USE AN EXISTING WELL ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT CONFER A WATER RIGHT CONDITTONS OF APPROVAL Section Line 1) This well shall be used in such a way as to cause no material Injury to existing water rights. The issuance of the permit does not assure the applicant that no injury will occur to another vested water right or preclude another owner of a vested water right from seeking relief In a civil court action. 2) The construction of this well shall be in compliance with the Water Well Construction Rules 2 CCR 402-2, unless approval of a variance has been granted by the State Board of Examiners of Water Well Construction and Pump Installation Contractors In accordance with Rule 18. 3) Approved pursuantto CRS 37-90-137(2) for the use of an existing well, constructed without a permit, appropriating ground water tributary to the Roaring Fork River, as an alternate point of diversion to the Basalt Conduit, on the condition that the well shall be operated only when the Basalt Water Conservancy District's substitute water supply plan, approved by the State Engineer, is in effect and when a water allotment contract between the well owner and the Basalt Water Conservancy District for the release of replacement water from Ruedi Reservoir is in effect, or under an approved plan for augmentation. BWCD contract #312. -- ----·-···· ----··-· -·-·---·--- ·4) The use of ground water from this well is lirnlted to drfnklng and sanitary pwposes Inside a 4,000 square foOI ollloefrepalr shop building, occasional llUck washing and floor washing, and not more than 1,000 square feet of landscape Irrigation. All use of · this well will be curtailed unless the water allotment contract or a plan for augmentation is in effect. t"'\\0 ,. ('a,o(~ 5) The maximum pumping rate shall not exceed 15 GPM. 6) The average annual amount of ground water to be appropriated shall not exceed 0"4 acre-fool (130,332 gallons). 7) A totalizing flow mater must be installed on this well and malmalned in good working order. Permanent records of all diversions must be maintained by the well owner (recorded at least annually) and submitted to the Division Engineer upon request. 8) The well must be located not more than 200 feet from the location specified on this perm~. 9) This well shall be located at least 600 feat from any existing well that is not owned by the applicant. 10) The owner shall mark the well In a conspicuous place with well permit number(s), name of the aquifer, and cou~ case nurnber(s) as appropriate. The owner shall take necessary means and precautions to preserve these markings. 11) This permit has been approved to withdraw an amount of water not to exceed 0-4 acre-foot and to be used as described in condition #4 above. You are hereby notWied that you have the right to appeal the issuance of this permit, by filing a written request with this office within sixty (60) days of the date of issuance, pursuant to the State Administrative Procedures Act (See Section 24-4-104 through 106, C.R.S.). $ 'lfi;;{qe APPROVED KJW Receipt No. n f v • _,4_1d_~_._ ~-1_._,_--___ c:;=)<Y ~-:&:· 0430382"""""';, •• , DATE ISSUED JUL Q 8 1998 ~PIRATION DATE JUL 08 1999 Rev. 03/13 APPLICATION FOR WATER ALLOTMENT CONTRACT BASALT WATER CONSERVANCY DISTRICT 1. Applicant(s) Contact Information a. Name: Eastbank, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company b. Mailing Address: 710 East Durant Ave., Unit W-6, Aspen, CO 81611 c. Street Address: 710 East Durant Ave., Unit W-6, Aspen, CO 81611 d. Telephone Numbers: 970-925-9046 e. Email Address: rmac@dunrene.com f. If Applicant is represented by an Attorney, please provide the Attorney's contact information, including name, address, telephone, and email: Sara M. Dunn, Esq. Balcomb & Green, P.C. P.O. Drawer 790 Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 970-945-6546 sarad@balcombgreen.com g. Emergency Local Contact Information, including n .ame, address, telephone, and email: Robert Macgregor, President of Dunrene Management, Inc., the Manager of Eastbank, LLC, contact information above. h. Contact Information of property manager, caretaker, irrigator, system . operator, or agent who should be provided a copy of this contract, including name, address, telephone, and email: Robert Macgregor, contact information above. 2. Type of land use (development) proposed for water allotment contract (i.e. single family home, subdivision, gravel pit, etc.): Equine hospital. Basalt Water Conservancy District Water Allotment Application Page2 3. Legal description and address of property on which District's water rights and/or contract water will be used (attach map and vesting deed with proof of ownership)*: Lot 2 as set forth and described by that certain Eastbank LLC Minor Subdivision Plat as recorded in the offices of the Garfield County Clerk and Recorder on September 8, 2015 as Reception No. 867717 (Drawer 20A), situated in the south half of Section 35, Township 6 South, range 89 West of the 6th P.M. in Garfield County, Colorado. A copy of the Plat is attached hereto. 4. Elevation of property: x 6-7,000 ft., 7-8,000 ft., 8-9,000 ft. ------- 5. Name and legal description of water supply diversion point(s): Name of Diversion: Eastbank Well No. 2. Type of Diversion: Well (e.g., a well, spring, ditch, pipeline, etc.) Legal Description: NWl/4, SEl/4, Section 35, Township 6 S, Range 89 W, of the 6th Principal Meridian, at a location 1,700 feet from the South Section Line and 1,950 feet from the East Section Line. UTM Coordinates (NAD 83/ Zone 13): Northing: 4372904.7 Easting: 302757.7 If diversion point is a well, please provide the Well Permit No. Well permit will be obtained once the contract is issued. Well Permit No. 050236-F Is the well operationa]/active? _X __ Yes, ___ No Is there currently an operating well meter? _X __ Yes, ___ No Notice: A valid well permit with operating well meter will be required under the contract. 6. Legal Water Supply: (please check one) Basalt Water Conservancy District Water Allotment Application Page 3 X Applicant requests consideration by the District to be included in the District's Umbrella Plan for Augmentation decreed in Case No. 02CW77. * *Note: Certain applicants may qualify to be included in the District's Umbrella Plan at the District's discretion. In order to be included in the District's Umbrella Plan, the Applicant's depletions must occur within the District's defined "Area A" and the Applicant must reimburse the District its pro rata share of the District's expenses in obtaining the Umbrella Plan decree. Costs of reimbursement are contingent upon location and intensity of the uses, and range from $1,200 for contractees with less than 2 units (EQRs) in certain areas, to $5,000 for more than 8 EQRs in Area A-3 (generally the Roaring Fork drainage above its confluence with the Fryingpan Rivers). __ Applicant will obtain its own plan for augmentation by applying to the Water Court, Water Division 5 within 2 years of this application. If Applicant has already applied for its own change/approval of plan for augmentation, the Water Court Case Number is: --------- 7. Proposed waste water treatment system: (please check) __ Tap to central waste water treatment facility X Septic tank/leachfield system __ Evapotranspiration system Other: 8. Proposed use of water (please check) Domestic/Municipal (single family home(s), duplex(s), condominium(s), mobile home(s), apartment). Please complete page four of this application. __ X_ Commercial (hotel, office, warehouse, restaurant, bar, retail). Please complete page five of this application. __ Industrial (gravel pit, manufacturing). Please complete page six of this application. __ Agricultural (crop irrigation, stock wateripg). Please complete page seven of this application. Date on which the county or other applicable governmental entities approved the land use for which you seek legal water service: Approvals Pending. (Note: Copy of the Resolution of other documentation evidencing such approval should be submitted with application.) Basalt Water Conservancy District Water Allotment Application Page .4 9. What other water rights are associated with or used on the property? None. 10. What other uses of water occur on the property? The Eastbank Well No. 2 currently serves the drinking and sanitary purposes inside a 4,000 square foot office/repair shop building, occasional truck washing and floor washing and not more than 1,000 square feet of landscape irrigation pursuant to Well Permit No. 050236-F and Basalt Water Conservancy District Allotment Contract No. 312. Please complete the section below if you selected domestic/municipal use on Page 3, No.8 DOMESTIC/MUNICIPAL WATER USES In-House Single family residential home(s) Number of Units: ------ Duplex(s) Number of Units: ------ Condominium(s) Number of Units: ------ Apartment(s) Number of Units/Rooms: --- Mobile Home(s) Number of Units: ------ Irrigation (lawns, parks, open space) Total area to be irrigated _____ Sq. Ft. or ____ Acres Type of irrigation system (please check) ____ Sprinkler _____ Flood (irrigation ditch) Domestic stock watering (cattle, horses) Number of animals: Basalt Water Conservancy District Water Allotment Application Page 5 Period of use (months): Other domestidmunicipal uses not listed: Please complete this page if you selected commercial use on Page 3, No. 8 COMMERCIAL WATER USES In-House Hotel: Office(s), square footage: Warehouse/distributor, square footage: _______ _ Retail, square footage: Restaurant, number of seats: -----------~ Bar, number of seats: Irrigation (lawns, parks, open space) Total area to be irrigated 1,300 Sq. Ft. or ____ Acres Type of irrigation system (please check) ____ Sprinkler ____ Flood (irrigation ditch) Other Commercial Uses Not Listed: A 4,000 Sq. Ft. equine hospital facility with four indoor stalls, a laundry facility, a full bath, break room with a sink, and possibly an Aquatred hydrotherapy unit. The facility is expected to have an average occupancy of 10 animal nights per week and will be staffed initially with three full time employees and at full capacity the facility will have up to five full time employees. To be conservative, the water use estimates assume 100% occupancy rates and full staffing 365 days per year and assumes all indoor water use is 100% consumptive. Please see attached summary of uses attached hereto. Basalt Water Conservancy District Water Allotment Application Page6 Please complete this page if you selected industrial use on Page 3, No. 8 INDUSTRIAL WATER USES Please describe your industrial development in some detail: Irrigation (lawns, parks, open space) Total area to be irrigated _____ Sq. Ft. or ____ Acres Type of irrigation system (please check) _____ Sprinkler _____ Flood (irrigation ditch) Basalt Water Conservancy District Water Allotment Application Page 7 Please complete this page if you selected agricultural use on Page 3, No. 8. AGRICULTURAL WATER USE Irrigation Type of crop(s) (pasture, alfalfa, beans, etc.) and irrigation system: Crop: Acres: Sprinkler: Flood: Crop: Acres: Sprinkler: Flood: Crop: Acres: Sprinkler: Flood: Crop: Acres: Sprinkler: Flood: Stock Watering (cattle, horses) Number of animals: Months of use: Other agricultural uses not listed: ' • f J. • Basalt Water Conservancy District Water Allotment Application Page 8 STATE OF COLORADO COUNTYOF Go<M~\d VERIFICATION ) ) SS. ) I, Ro be(.\-('A4C~'l'f-<if < (name of Applicant or Applicant's duly authorized representative), bng~t duly sworn, upon oath, depose and state as follows: 1) I am the Applicant or a dµly authorized officer, manager, agent or attorney-in-fact for the Applicant for this Application for Water Allotment Contract; 2) I have read and know the contents of this Application; 3) The information contained herein is an accurate and complete description of the Applicant's intended use of the Basalt Water Conservancy District's water rights; 4) The Applicant acknowledges that the accuracy and truth of all statements in this Application are conditions of approval of this Application by the Basalt Water Conservancy District and of the Contract to be made pursuant to such approval; and 5) I acknowledge that this application shall be subject to the District's Water Allotment Contract as approved and issued by the Dis ·ct. Date: Y /z_ 'D // <P r I Subscribed and sworn before me this 2. '5~ day of _(-)--tp,_r_;..;_( ____ , 20 l.!!l_ by Bo1oe<i ~jce50< Witness my hand and seal. My commission expires: NATALIE ZANCANELLA NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF COLORADO NOTARY ID #20074036139 Uy CommisslOn Expir9S Seplember 24, 2019 Basalt Water Conservancy District Water Allotment Application Water Use Estimates for Equine Hospital Attachment Indoor Water Use in Gallons per Day: Horses -Full Occupancy at 4 per day using 12 gpd each 48 gpd Stalls -Washing/Cleaning at 4 per day using 20 gpd each 80 gpd Laundry Facility at an average of two loads per day 50 gpd each 100 gpd Workers - 5 full time employees at 35 gpd each 175 gpd Aquatread Hydrotherapy Pool at 100 gpd 100 gpd Total: 503 gpd at 365 days per year, total estimated water use: 0.563 AF per year. EASTBANK, LLC MINOR SUBDIVISION PLAT NOTES: A SUBDMSION OF PARCEL 2A OF EASTBANK, LLC LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN THE S 1 /2 SECTION 35, 1. BASS CF l£ARINGS fUR 1HJS SUR\t:Y IS A llEAllllG CF SW54°27"W llE11IEEN 11£ EAST WNmR CllHll (I' !ilCTIQll J5, A S1'0I€ 11 PlM% AND 1llE WEST QIJNITEll aF SfCl10I J5, A S1UIE FlllW II Pl.M:E AS 9ICl'llll ltEREllL 2. DATE aF lHIS 5111\'EY WAS MJGUST ZI, 2015. I.KAR IJNllS t.r.iEII 111 P£RFDRll 1ltlS SUR~ llERE U.S. SlllMY f'fET,PS 3. 1115 SJMY IS llASID ON RECEP110N ND. tll72li1, llEEP11CN NO. 097252. AN lll'ROVEllEllT SUl\'EY PUT PftEl'AllED BY II. DARREll. 1MlE. LS. NO. 1337 DAlDI: SEPIDllEll 17, 1111, 1ltE REl:ORDED PU'IS (I' E1IWI< RANOf All> -RAN0t. ROARING FIJI( TRANSPCIRTA'llCIN AUlHORl1Y RIGHT-IF-WAY SUR~ llAl'S PIEPAllED BY FARNSllORllt GR00P PR0oECT ND. -.7 SHEE1S 9 I< 10, 1HE EAS1llM« LDT llPUT llEl:ORDID AT RECEFllON ND. rnMJe, 11£ EAS1BANK PARCE. 2 IDT SPUT RECORIJBI AT RECfP1DI Ill. 111J4112 AND IXllll£llS FlllW 11 PLACE AS SH01N HEREON. 4. 1115 PRIPERTY IS Slll£CT 10 RESERVA'llON!;. RESIRICllOllS. aMJIAHlS AllD E'ASDIDllS aF R£CDllD al II Pl.ACE AHO ElCCD'TIONS 111 1l1l£ SHO~ IN 1HE 1l1l£ ClllU1llDIT PREPAR£11 BY STEWART 1l1l£ CUAR.IH1Y COlil'ANY, EFFtCmf: DAlE: MJCUST 11, 2015. (Fl.£ H\llBDI 512111). !I. foljy FUlURE LAND USE DC\El.O'MOrf APPUCAllOll PROPOSAi. llllH RESPECT 10 LDT 3 HEREOF !!HALL BE REQUIRED 10 PRO\'IDE ADEQUAlE ROAD ACCESS f'll! SUCH PROPOSm USES 5Ul'FICIENT TO SAllSFY lHEN APPl.JCAl!l£ GARflElJl COUNTY STANDARDS. I. CClNTRCL C1F NOXIOUS VEEDS IS lHE RE!PONSIBllJTY CIF lHE PROPERTY OWER. 7. HO OPDI HEAR1H sot.D-fl.El. FIR£Pl.M:[S 1111..L BE AlUIWEll ANY'lttERE i.tHIN THE Sl&lll/ISIOll. ONE NEW SQ.ID-FUEL BURNING STOVE AS DEFINED ll't CJU. 2r7-<IOI. ET.SEQ., AND T1£ REllUl.A'llOH$ PllOIM.GllTED 1HEREUlllER. wtLL BE AWl'M:IJ IN AHY DW£WNG UNIT. AU. DWEWHG UNITS 'MU. BE AU.OWED ,.,. UNRE5TRICIED NUMBER OF NAlURAI. GAS BURNING SllMS AND APPUANCES. !I. AU. EX1ERIOR LIGHTING SHAU. BE THE MlllMUM AMOUNT NECESSMY AND THAT AU. EXTERIOR LIGHllNG SHAU. BE DIREClED INWARD AND DOWNWARD, Tt!WAllDS lHE lll'ERIOR OF T1£ SIJBDIWllON, EXCEPT THAT PR<MSIONS MAY BE MADE TO AUDW FOR SAFETY LIGHTING lHAT GOES BEYOND 111£ PACIPfRTY BOUNDARIES. D. COl.DRADO IS A "RICHT-10-FARM• STAlE PURSUANT TO c.R.S. 35-3-11, ET. SEQ. l.ANDO\ltj£RS, RElllDENlS AND VlsrTCRS llUST BE PREPARED TO ACCEPT 1HE ACllVITIES. SIGH'IS. SOUNDS AND !llllB.LS OF GARf1El.D CCUN1YS AGRICUl. lURAI. 0P£RA 1IONS AS A NOR11AL AND NECESSARY ASPECT OF Lii/iNG IN A COUNTY Wlllt A S1RONG RURAL CHARACTER AND A HEAl.lHY RANCHING SECTOR. lHOSE Wl1H AN URBAN SENSITTlllTY UAY P£RCElllE SUCH ACllVlllES. SIGHlS. SOUND, AND Slla.1.5 ONl Y AS INalN-IENCE. E"fESOR£. NOISE AND ODOR. HOWEVER, STA 1E LAW AND COUNTY POLICY PROlllDE lHAT RANCHING, FARUINC AND OlHER AClllCUl.TURAL AClllllTIES AND OP£11ATTONS lllTHIN GARFIELD COUNTY SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED TO BE IMSANCES SD LONG AS OPERATED IN CONFORMANCE lllTH 1HE LAW AND II A NON-NEQJCEHT MANNER. lHERERlRE. AU. llUST BE PREPARED TO ENCOUNTER NOISES, ODOR, LIGHTS, llUD, DUST. SMDKE. Di£1o1CALS. MACHINERY CIN PUBUC ROADS. LIVESTOCK ON PUBLIC ROADS. STORAGE AND lllSPOSAL OF MANURE. AND 1HE APl'UCAllON IJY SP!!A'llNG Oft OTHEllWISE OF CHEUICAL FERTl.JZERS, SOL AUEJalUENT, HERBIQDE. AND PESTICIDES, AHY ONE OR MORE OF WHICH MAY NA1\JRAU.Y OCCUR AS PART CIF L£1lAL AND NClN-NEGUGENT AGRlCUl.'JUllAL OPERATICNS. ID. AU. 0MERS DF I.AND, V1E11!ER RANCH OR REllllENCE. HAVE CBUGATlONS UNDER STA1E LAW AND COUNTY RECIA.AllONS 'M1H REGARD 10 lHE MAJNT'EMANCE DF FElltES AND llll!IGA'IKlN Dl1D£S. CllN'IROUJNG ¥IEEDS. KEEPING UVE5TDCK AND PETS UNllEft CONTROi. USING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE Wlllt ZONING. AND 01HER ASP£C1S OF USING AND llAINTADllNC PROP£111Y. RESDEMTS AND l.NIDO'MERS ARE ENCOURAGED 10 LEAllN AllOUT 'lle;E RIGHTS AND R£SPONSllllJT1E AN ACT AS GOOD NEIGHBORS ANO Oll2EHS OF 111E COUNTY. A GOOD INTR!XlUC'TORY SOURCE f'OR SUCH INF'llRUATlOll IS "A GUIDE TO RURAL U'llNC I< SUAU. SCALE ACRICUL1URE" PUT OUT BY 111E COLORADO STAlE UNlllERSITY EXTENSION omCE IN CARF1llD COUNTY. 11 . DOGS KEPT Oii 1HE PROPERTY SHAU. BE IN A fENC(D YARD OR ON A L£ASH TD PREVENT HAIWl3MOIT Of WIUlUFE. 12. FENCING ON 1HE PROPERTY SHALL COMPLY 'MTH lHE COLORADO PARKS AND WIUJUfE SPECIFICATTCJIS f'OR VllLDUFE-fRIENDLY FENCING. Tl. EHGINEEIHlESIGNED SEPTIC SYSTEMS ARE REQUIRED WllltN lHIS SUBDIVISION. 14. 1HE PROPERTY IS UNDERl.AIN BY EAGLE VAU.EY EVAPORllE, AND NUllEROUS SINIO!CUS AND SlllL-cou.APSE OCCURRENCES HAVE BEEN IDENTFIED lllTHIN ~AL THOUSAND FEET DI' THE SITE. SINKHCU:S. SUBSIDENCE AND GROUND DEFDRMA110N DUE TD COUAPSE CF SOLUTION CAVITIES AND VOIDS ARE A SERIOUS CONCERN IN 11£ EMU VN.JEf EVAPORl'IE. INFREQUENT SNKHOl.E FORllAllON IS Sl1LL. AN ACTIVE GEll.OOC PROCESS IN 111E ROARING FDRIC VAU.EY, AND GROUND SUBSIDENCE ll£lA TED TO 1HE DISSOWTICIN OF EVAPORllE BEDROCIC IS AN UNPREDICTAl!L£ RISK. 15. 1HE ACCE55 DRIVEWAY nia.t CA 1!54 TO LOT 1 DF THE EAS1llANK lllNOR SUBDIVISION MAY ONLY BE CCUBINED lllllt ACCESS TO LOT 2 OF THE EASTTIANK MllOR SUBDIVISION. 1HE ACCESS DRl'ltWAY FROM CR 154 TO LOT 1 SHAU. NOT BE COUllNED Wlllt lHE ACCESS TO ANY OlHER PARCEL OR LOT. 111. LOT 2 AND 3 5HA1.1. l)E\gDp A STDAll WATER llANACalDIT PLAN AT THE Tiii£ OF llEVEl..DPloENT OR REDEVEl.IJPMOIT. STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY FILE NO. St280 EFFEC11VE DATE: AUGUST t t, 20 IS SCHEDULE &PART 2 NOTES EXCEl'llONS 1 'llllOUQI I ~ STNIDARD 1l1l£ EXCEl'11Cllis. 10. 1HIS PROPERTY IS SUll.ECT TD RESERVATIONS AICl EXCEPllONS IH PATENTS. OR ACTS AUTTtORIZlNC 111£ ISSUANCE lHEREDF, INCl.JJDINC lHE RESERVATIONS OF THE RIGHT OF WAY FOR onatES OR CANALS CONS1RUC1ED 8Y TltE AlllHORITY CIF 1HE UNITED 5TAlES. AS RESERVm IN UNl'IEll STAlEll PATENT R£CDRDED llAY 2D. 11111 AT 11£CE!'llON NO. 21741. 11. 1H1S PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO REl!ERVA110NS ANTI EXCEPTIONS Ill PATEll'TS. OR AC1S AUlHCRIZING 1HE ISSUANCE lltEREOf', INQ..UDlllC THE RESSIVA TIONS OF THE RIGHT OF PRllPRIElUR OF A VEIN OR LlllE 10 EXTRACT AND RBIOVE HIS ORE 1HEREFR011 !HOUUl 11£ 5AUE BE FllUND 10 PENElRAlE OR INTEll!ECT 1HE PllOl!IE!I AS RESERVE> Ill UN1ED STATES PATENT RECORDED MAY 2D. 181111 AT RECEPTION NO. 21741. 12. EASOIENTS GRANTED TO THE UOUNTAIN STA'1ES 'IEIDHDNE AND 'IEl..ECRAPH COUPANY BY llSTRUllENT RECORDED AUGUST 21, 1821 AT RECEPTION ND. 105227, AND BY INST1IUMENT RECORDED .U.Y 13. um AT RECEP110N NO. 110547. EASalENT UD NllRlHEASIERI. y OF EXISllNO COLDRADD STAlE HIGHWAY 112 AICl DOES NOT AFFECT THE llUB..ECT PROPERTY. 13. EASEMENT GRANTED TD THE llOUNTAllt STA'1ES 'l!lll'HClNE AND 1EUDW'll CGIPANY BY INS!llUUEltT RECORDED OCTOBER 21. 1a. AT RECEPTIOH ND. 227425. EA!OIDIT U£S NORlHEASlERl.Y OF ~C CQ.DRADO STA1E HIGHWAY 12 AND DOES NC1T AFFECT 1HE llUB..ECT PROP£RTY. 14. 1ERM5. IDOTION5. PROlllSIONS. AGll!DIENTS AND OllUGATIONS AS CONTAINED IN GARFIELD COUNTY RESOUITION 111-J87 REC0RD£D DEC£llllER 22. 11111 AT RECel'TION ND. 322148. DOES NOT AFFECT K SUB.Elli' PRCl1'£1m'. 1~ 1B!MS, CONDITIONS. PROVISIONS. AGREDIENlS AND CBIJOATIONS AS CONTAINDl IN llARFIEIJI COUNTY RESOLllTION 83-122 RECaillED llAY 17. 111113 AT 11£CEPTION NO. 342137. IN SO fNI AS lHEY AFFECT 1HE !1111.ECT PROPERTY. 111. EASDIENT FOR WATER LINE flRNl1ED TD I.Ill .IAllMARON llY INSlRUllENT RECORDED FEBRUARY 15. 1985 AT RECEPT10ll NO. ~ IS SHO'llN HEREON BUT DCES HOT AFFECT 111E lll&ECT PROPERTY. 17. 1ERM5. CONDITIONS, PROWllONS. AGREEllEMTS AND OBUGA110NS AS CONTAINED II llARFIELll CCUNTY RESll.llTTON 87-92 REIXlRllED OCTOBER 7. 1897 AT RECEPTION NO. :514711D. IN SO FAR AS 1HEY AFfECT THE SUB.ECT PROPERTY. 111. AGRICU. TURE E!aOACHIENT UCEN£ IM1H THE ROARING RlAK lRANSPORTA TTON AUlHORITY AS SET FORTH BY INSlRUUENT RECORDED AUCll5T 22. 2llD5 AT RECEPTION NO. llllOll;J2. T1£ PORTION OF K AGRICULTURAL FED lHAT ENCROACHES INTO 1HE RFTA RIGHT-<F-WAY DOES NOT AFFECT lHE SUll.ECT Pll<l'ERTY. 10. RIGHT OF WAY FOR ROARINC Fall< TRANSIT MJTTtORITY OVER 1HE HOR1HEAS1iRLY SIDE OF Sl&ECT PROPERTY AS -ON THE PLAT OF ~ PARCEL 2 LDT SPUT, ACCORDING! TD ll£ Pl.AT 1HEREOF FUD JANUARY 111. 2D12 AT RE~TltlN NO. 1113402. IS SHOW HEREON. 20. RIGHT OF WAY FOR DITCH AS &HO'llll ON 111£ Pl.AT aF EAS11IANK PARCEi. 2 LOT SPUT, ACCORDIHG TO 1HE Pl.AT THEREOF FUD JANUARY 18, 2012 AT flECEl'llDN NO. 8134112. Dm:H IS SH0\111 HEREDN. 21. ANY lDSS OR DAMAGE ARISING fllOU THE FACT 111AT 1NE FENCE LIND ON OR NEAR THE BOUNDARY LINES OF T1£ SUB.ECT PROPERTY DD NOT COINCIDE 1M1H T1£ EXACT COURSES OF 1HE llOUNDAllY LINES, AS DISCLOSED BY THE Pl.AT OF EAS1BNIK PARCEL 2 LOT S'IJT, ACIXllDllG TD 111E Pt.AT 1ltEAEDF FUD JNruAllY 111. 2012 AT RECEPTlOll NO. 813402. IN SO FAR AS 1HIS EFFECTS 1HE !U8.ECT PROPERTY. 22. 1ERM5. CONDl110NS. PRllW!XJl5. AGREEMENTS Nil CIBUGATICllS AS CONTAINED IN EASEMENT AGREDIENT llllllt IKIARIN!; FORK SCHOOL ll1S1RICT, RE-1 AND KW GUlll'IDOD SPRINGS, U.C AS SET F'OllTH BY INS1RUllENT RECORDED .U.Y 23, 2015 AT RECEPTION NO. 80S78I. EASEllENTS NIE. Sli<NN HEREON. 23. THIS PROPERTY IS !1111.ECT TO RElnlJTICIN NO. 2015-41 ISSIJm 8Y lHE COUNTY OF GARFIELD, STAlE OF COLORADO BY INSTRUllDIT RECORDED AUCllST .1. 2015 AT RECEPTION NO. 1185313 AND IS A LAND USE CHANGE PERMIT. SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE L RODIE' P. 1C1SER. DO HEREBY CER1lfY 'IHAT I All A PmnSSONAL LAND SllRVE'llll LICENSED UNDER ll£ LAWS Of 1HE STA1E j{,,,~~=~IS.:r=-~~~~~™wi~~~~BY~AND IHlEll MY 9l'EIMilON AND CORR£1:1\.Y SHDIS THE LllCAllllN AND lllllEllSIDNS DF ntE um, EASEJIENT5 AND S1IElS DF ~'Ji~~ lHE SAME ARf: 5TN<ED UPCtl T1£ GIKUI> IN IXllPUANCE 111H APPUCAlll£ R£1lULA'llONS .. Wl1lESS TtHEREDF , HA\£ SET MY HAND AND SEAL lllS z~DAY Of Auce!JSir 201e. B'l:._,,,RODNEY,,,,.,,~~~ICISER.==,,....,.L.S.':"":'N0.::--:3821:==~5~~~~ 1517 II.AKE AVENUE. SUITE 101 GUJIWO(Q SPRllGS, CD 1111!D1 TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 89 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M. COUNTY OF GARFIELD, STATE OF COLORADO \~: ;\ ' . ., TITLE CERTIFICATE VICINITY MAP SCAL.£: 1" a 2,000' I, ROBERT C. AEEi_ ~~ Of ADVANCE TIT1E CDllPANY AS AGENT FOR SIEWART TIT1E CllARANTY COMPANY, DO HEREBT CERllFY THAT I HAVE EXAllNED 1HE llllE TO All LANDS SHOMI ll'Ool THIS PUT AND THAT lll1E 10 SUCH LANDS IS ~ IN EAST1IANIC W:. A Cll..DRADO l.lllTEII UAllUTY COMPANY, EIJZAllElH llACQiEtlCR IRREVOCA8I£ 1RUST DA'IEll D£CEllBER XI, 2000 AND fUlRA llACIJIEGOR IRREVDCABl£ 1RUST DATED DEaMBER 27. 2000. FREE AND a.EAR CF ALL LIENS AND ENOJMl!RANCES (INCl.JJDING MORTGAGES. DEEDS OF lRUST, .IJOGllEN'IS, EASEMEN'IS, CDNTRACiS AND AGREEMENTS OF RECORD AFFECTING lHE REAL PROPERTY II 1HIS Pl.AT), EXCEPT AS SET fDRlll OI THIS Pl.AT. DATEII lltl~AY Of A~!l ";t;; A.O. 2015. .Y AND NOT lllE ACCUIACY llF SURVEYS. CALal.AllONS AND DRAF1JNG PURSUANT 10 CJ!.S., 38-51-101 AND 102. ET SEQ. t;;2KJVY:f 2015. CERTIFICATE OF TAXES PAID L THE UNDERSIGNED, DO HER£BY CERTIFY ~T THE ENTIRE AllOUNT or TAXES AND ASSESSllENTS DIE AND PAYABLE AS OfAzr n 'Jb/f'i UPON AU. PARCllS Of REAL ESTA1E DESCM!ED DH TllS PLAT ARE PAID f'l.U. 1H"-~1 · fZ..oqsii~ DATED THIS ..J.J_ DAY CF ~'f A.I>,, 2015. f. OK30 20 B~~+bf:~ CLERK AND RECORDER'S CERTIFICATE THIS RI.Al WAS ~~DIN lliE OFFlCE Of THE a.ERK AND RECORDER OF GARFJEl.D COUNTY AT~Cl.OCK__Pt:J__. ON THIS l::!l:H... DAY A.O. 2015, AND IS DULY RECOROID ~l'lW/!I!. Zbll AS RECEPTION NO. of c!'f, ZI. DO ,ONFORMED CliRK AND RE<DDER COPY BY:rDEPiC'iilU~TY.,-~~~~~~~~~~- CERTIFICATE OF DEDICATION AND OWNERSHIP 1HE IJNDERSIQffD EAS11A111 LLC, A CQ.DRAOO 1.ArnD UA81U1Y COUPANY. EUZABOi MACCRECOR lllREVDCAlll£ 1RUST DA'IEll DEtUlllER 27, 200D AND Ft.ORA UACGllECIR 1RREYOC.181L 'lllUST DATED DEca&R 27, 2IXIO 11 FEE 5lllPI£ !F AU. lHAT REAL PR0PERTT SlnJA 1ED IN GAllFEJl CWNTY, DE5ClllBED AS FlllDWS: A PAl!al. aF l.Nll l.DCAltD ft 1HE SOU1l1 HALF rE SEC110H ~ TO..aiP I SallH, llNICE 89 1ES1(I'THE1111 PRINCIPAL llElllllAll. l'!llO NOR1HEllLY CF 1HE CENTElllM OF 1HE RQARINC Riie 11M11 AND S0111HIES1DILY OF 1HE llOARllG flllll( TRANSPORTATKJN MJTHCJaTY RIGHT-of-WAY AND Cll.lllADO STATE llQlllAY 12 RICHT-GF-WAY, llElllG 1K1!E PNITICUUllLY DESallllED AS FW.D'IS: BEGINllNG AT A PCINT Ill THE SWlHllESTERLY RIGHT-of-WAY OF ca.oRAD0 STAIE HIQlllAY 112. A REllAll AND CAP FOUND ~ PLAC£. (IHNCE 11£ 5CUTHWT ClllNER rE SAID !ilC1ION Jll, 11E11G A J 1/4" -CN'. llEAllS SJT44'52"E A DISTANCE CIF ZJ75.llll FEET); 1HENCE DEPAATIN; SAID RIQfT-<W-WAY 533'14'47"'1 A DISTANa: CF :llll..12 FEET 10 A ~ II T1£ aJl1ERLllE Of THE ROARING FORK RIVER; 1\tENCE M fOli.ONHG 111REE (3) COLllSES Al.llNG SAID CDITB!UNE OF 1HE ROMING FIJI( RMR: I. N7rM'38"W A lllSTANCE Of llDll.13 FEET; 2. S!T4!'22"W A DISTANCE OF Jil1.3! FEET: :S. 5!512'22"W A DISTANCE OF 170.00 FEET: 1HENCE llfl'MINi SAID CENlERlllE ND4•47'Je"W A DISTANCE OF 125.00 FEET; THEllCE S771l3'01"W A DISTANCE OF 241.82 FEET: 111ENCE 5153'-ISlll"W A DISTAllCE OF ».DO FEET; 'lllllCE SOO'OD'DCl"E A DISTANCE IF 22.42 FEET; ~CE S71"Jll'40"W A DISTANCE Of' 112. 7' FEET; 1IEtCf Al.lllG A TNfllENT CIJRVE lO 1ltE LEFT HAVNI A RADIUS Of 745.00 FEET, A c:EmRAL ANCU: rE 14"25'01", A DISTANCE CIF 11!7.4! FEET (OtclllDS ll£ARS S14'211'07"W A DISTANCE CIF 1-FEET); l!DCE S57'1J'34"W A DISTANCE OF 171.H FEET; THENCE S71"47'48"w A llSTANCE DF' 2211.114 FEET; 1HENCE ll7n0'20"W A DISTANCE !F :1911..56 FEET; 11£HCE ALONG A NDN-TANCell' CIJRVE 111 1HE Rll:HT llAWIG A RADIUS (I' 1517.DO f'E[l', A aH111AL AllGl£ (I' 117'17'55", A DISTANC[ aF 1113.24 f'fET (CHORD llEAllS NOS'41°21"W A DISTANCE (I' 1113.11 F'E£'T); 1l£NCE N02'U1'JIJ'W A DISTANCE !F 9J,114 FEET; 1l£HCE Non.1'S!"W A DISTANCE (I' 199.15 FEET; 1llEMCE AUlNC A TANCOIT CIJRYE 10 11£ un HA\Nl A RADIUS (I' ~00 f'fET, A CDITllAl ANGLE rE 05'35'5!" (OIORD BEAllS N12'10'22"W A DISTANCE (I' D5.JI F'E£'T); 1H£11CE Ntrairw A DISTANCE OF ID.17 f'fET; 11EHCE A1.11NG A TANC:ENT CIJRVE TD TltE LEFT HA-A RADIUS llF 30Q.OC FEET, A CEN11IAL AHQ.E !F 20'08'5T, A DISTANCE !F 105.!0 FEET (CllOllO ll£N!S N24'44'53"11 A DISTANCE OF 1114.91 nEl); llENC[ NOT.ll 'OTW A llSTAHCE C1F 197.53 FEET; 11ENCE N41'211'!&"E A DISTANa: rE 71.22 FEET; 1HENCE ~·on: A DISTANCE (I' 1111.2!5 FEET; TllEllCE NOD'54'54"W A DISTANCE (I' 121.114 FEET; 1HENCE N20'21'21'E A DISTANCE (I' 133.31 FEET; 1HENCE N1.l"30'211't A DISTANCE aF a.17 FEET; THENCE No49'27'2'E A DISTANCE CF llU!i FEET TO A PONT ON T1IE NCll1HERLY BOlllDMT C1F 11£ SOU1l1 HAU' OF SAID SECTION 35' THDICE DEPAlllNG SAID NalllfEllLY BOLelDARY SllO'V7'44"'E A DISTANCE CF 147.211 FEET; THENCE Al.ONG THE ARC (I' A CIJRVE lO 1HE LUT HAWIC A llADlJS OF 11111.00 FEET, A CDllRAL ANlll Of l.lO"IU'Df', A OISTANCE (I' 1476.72 FEET, (Cl!OllD 8£NIS 985"12'41"'E A DISTANCE OF 1171.01 FlEr); 1HEllCE N411'42'D7"E A DISTANCE OF 175.57 f'fET; 1HENCE Al.lllC A CIJRVE TO THE LEFT HAI/INC A llADIUS OF 287.79 FEET AND A COllRAL ANCl.E CIF 211'41'44°, A DISTANCE CF 134.12 FEET (OfllAD SEARS ~'04"'E A DISTANCE (I' 132.72 FEET; 1ltENCE HSll"l7'21"E A DISTANCE !F IJD.Dll FEET; 11£11CE N!4"42'2li"W A DISTANCE CF M.5J FEET: 11£HCE Al.llllG THE ARC Of A CU!M 10 11£ RIQIT HAVllG A RADIUS or 1ll0.00 FtET AND A CENTRAL ANCU Of 45'21'05", A DISTANCE CIF 142.!4 FEET (Cl!Olal BEARS Nl1'5!'22"W A DISTANCE or 131.12 FiET); 'IHENCE N39i4'1VW "DISTANCE Of 103.87 rn:r: 1IENCE ALDNC 11£ ARC or A DJRllE 10 11£ RIGHT llA\INO A RADIUS CIF 280.00 rn:T ANO A CEN111AL ANC1..E C1F 13"41'34°, A DISTANCE Of 11.91 FtET (Cl!OllD BE.IRS llJ2'2SJZ"W A DISTANCE Of 1111.76 FiET); THEllCE 1125"J2'45"W A DISTANCE OF 127.21 rn:T; THENCE 116J"l3'5l"E A DISTANCE (I' 128.11 fIET; lHEHCE S71"45°24"E A DISTANCE OF 84.9~ FEET: TH£HC£ N73"43'41"E A DIS1ANCE or 277.a7 FEET; THENCE =:zn A DISTANCE aF 141.11 fIET; nea S14'S8'36"E A DISTANCE Of' 142.111 FEET: THENCE S71"15'14'E A DISTANC£ (I' 29.84 rn:T; THENCE Al.ONG 1HE ARC DF A CURVE TD T1£ un HAWIC A RADlJS or 125.00 FEET AND A aNIRAI. ANGIE or J8"04'5T, A DISTANCE CIF 113.0! FEET (CllOllD BEARS Nll1'42'17"'E A DISTANC[ or 11.511 FEEi): Tl£NCE NIX311'4!"E A DISTANCE OF 37.lll FEET; THENCE N49'0011't A DISTANCE CF ZD.2D FEET TO A POINl ON THE SQIJlHllE!llERLY RIGHT-IF-WAY (I' COUIRAllO STATE llGHWAY 112; THDtCE THE ~ SX (B) CllURSE5 ALONG SAID 5CUTHllESIBl1.Y RIQiT-IF-WAY (I' CDl.IJIADO STATE HIGHWAY 82: 1. 54D'S'49'E A DISTANCE C1F 72.n FEET; Z. S471l5'31'E A DISTAllCE CIF JOUO FEET: :S. SS1iJ'2a'E A DISTANCE CF 111.IJ FEET: 4. S$4"41'48'E A DISTANCE OF 1111.711 FEET; 5. S5rCIZ'59"t A DISTllNCE Of 1111.11 FEET: IS. ssnJ'24'E A DISTANC! OF ID.41 FEET 1ll 1!f'. f!l!T « !!£4j!NNllG, SAID PARC(L or LAND CONTAINING Jl.217 ACRES. UORt: DR ~ HA\£ CAUSED 1HE DESall!ED REAL PROPERlY 111 9E SIJIM:'l[D. I.All OUT AND PLATTED ~ SllOYlll ON 1HIS PLAT UlllER 1HE NAME AND SrnL (I' Wi11W:1K. ~-~~~i:=~ ~=..=~f'li'~~~ ~'t::r~~nc:uOF llAINTENANCE DI' U'IUTIES. IRRIGA 111111 AND DRAIHAIE fACU1D INCUJDlllG, BUT NOT lAlf1ED TD, El£CTRIC L11ES. GAS Ul£S ANl 1lliPHONE llNES, TDC1i11ER l1ll'IH 1HE RlGltT 10 Tlilll INTEliFERNl 1ll£ES AND llRIJSH, ll1H PEIPEllJAL RIGHT OF INGllESS AND EGRESS FtlR INSTAUATllll AND MAt•TENANCE C1F SUCH UNES. SJOi EA!EllEll1' -RlllllS SIAlL BE UTIJZED II A REAS11NA11LE ANll PIUlENT llAllMEL ALL ElCPOISC FtlR !l1REET PAI/INC Ill lll'llDl9IElf1S SHAU. BE RJRNISIEl BY THE SEl1ER DR PURCllASER. HOT BY THE COUNTY OF GARFIEID. EXECU1ED THIS ~ 'riAY Of (M 1 lp4.:'i I A.O., 2015. lllKlt K W:. A COLDllADO UllTED lJABllllY COllPANY /2AVEHU£. UNIT W-B ASPEN, CD 1111111 ~./ ~1~,}~/v.."""~1N&1 Eh': ' ,,, r.s 11,.,.,,..,"""'a la CllUlf1Y ore I""""' 1 ~~ CERtn:.tJ?: a DEDICATION AND OINEllSHP WAS .AO<NOidfDGm llEFllRE 11E 1111S .,1,S Tit DAY (I' A..' • '• • -P'Z $ W A5 ~_... ... .,... (I' EAS1llN« U..C. A CXllllAIXI llllED UMIUTY alllPAN~ ~~~·';ii\'l;e;z~ ~. ' AUOREYEWS 'MlNESS MY HAND AND QfTICIAL SEAL NOTARY PUBLIC ~'I Ngr~?ci~~.216 NO~C UyCommlaionE!i*aJuly23,201Q QlllWI: ~llAal!ECDll IRREVOClllE TRUST DATED IJECOl1IEJI XI, ~ 71D ysT DIMANT AV£HUE. UllT w-11 ASPEN, CD 1111111 /.rl'~f -:~:;;~~-la ~~) 1HE FllREr:QNC ClllllFICAllOI OF DEDICATION AND OVIERSl9' WAS AO<NO'llfDGOl llEFOllE UE 1H1S ~DAY (I' .IL.~u..-r" BY. l)JJWf::' & MA.c..Dq: AS p2MJr!z.I!:. c»: B.JZA8E1H MACGREGOR ttltE\IOCAaE 1RlST DAlED ~- llY COllllJSSIOI EXPID 1 f,i.3 /J.,o I'\ ; r \lllNESS MY HAND AND amaAL SEAL 14..t... 'i at.,, NOTARY l'llBJc AUDREY ELLIS NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF COLORADO NOTARY ID #20034024415 My Comniulon E>pim July 23, 2D1U !llllEI!; ~Gal IUIE'IDC.llU 1RUST DA'Rll DEl:EllllfR XI, DID ~ DU~~E. UNIT 'N-11 ASPEN, CO 1111111 llY\ /I ~ ~.~~ 2Dl5, 2Dl5, 1HE ~ gi:IH:ATICN OF OEDICATICN Niii Cl1llERSlm' WAS AaCN0m llERlRE llE 1llS ~DAY !F ~ 2015, BY!...: M"'4e Ir ASTfZY.>" r rs Fl.ORA MACGIBOR UIREYOCAEl.E lRUST DATED DECEM8£R • llY CCIMS90ll DP11D 7-/' ''AA 1 ' AUDREY ELLIS 'OIESS llY HAND ANl oma111. 3EAL sr~-l'J~ ~~~ (\ •• b,'iOkz ..,~=~'.~19 CERTIFICATE OF MINERAL ESTATE OWNERSHIP 1HE UNDERSIONED SURFACE OWNERS OF THE LANDS SHOllN ON 1NIS PLAT CERTIFY THAT THEY ALSO O'llN 'IHE lllNERAL ESTAlE APP\JlllEIWIT 1HPE1ll ACCOllDllC 10 ns REVIEW OF lHE 1lTl£ llECIRDS AND SUll.£CT TD AHY APPLICABI.£ PAlENT RESERVATION. lllliElt WTBANIC U.C. A ca..DIWlO LlllED UASllTY CClllPANY C/0 DUNllEN! llANAGEllENT, INC. 710 EAST DURANT A\ENJE, llll!T w-e "[';' co 811111 I ~ .-wx .M o~ .u.s1Df1JJ1'01A~'!.. ,.,.,..,.,,..,Ch.INr, , ~~ -=~~ DEtEUl!ER 27, 2000 C/D DUNREIE llANAGEllENT, INC. ~~·--~ Eh':$ '6c.c.x--~;=u ~ ~ IRREVDCAlll.E T1lllST DATED DEElll£ll %7, 2000 ~~~=.r·~l\<-1 ~1111 11'1: ~ .-----...... . ~AOVT;1"~t:, ~ ~3~~ 2s !Ii~ ~~~g ~~ Ol~ ;:;~~~ ~s~d~~ 5~ ~8 ~~~2 ~~~~ i5~ ~u-~ -'~~o ~ z Q Ul ~ Lil ~ 0 g q .. ~ >~Iii ~1 ~ II ~ 11. I ~ 5 2 b. ~ c5 I z -it! E~ Ill -ms :E 111 Ea~ 8 z . >C • G ~i~ ~ z hie rJ Ill '( Bl ID :C U§!~ ::::»iii~! 0 -Cl~ u ~ :c a. t?> :c 0 z~ o9 ~-o ~~~ ~~~:> mo o::u ~9 2111 ~ " PROJECT NO. 21St60S.OO I OF2 :t 0 ~ ::5 :t ~ ll. I AIJJlllNIUll LSl5710 I I I ~C110N35 PREHM RANCH GRAPHIC SCALE --------{ Ill Piil' ) 1 lmlh -eao 1t. lllTw:2: Aa:llDC 1'I CD.CllADa LO 11111&1!11' GIMID'. IMf LBZIL ACnlClll UllD I.al NW.,.,.• .. UMY .,._ ... 'II.Ml -1111-lllllMllSDIDIRCt llllllWllTllAY-M:lllll MllD .._ Mtf aumT IC .. ._.. CIMBICID -1IWf D WliM f1m 1IC DAlE" ...._,._ ..,_. HlllDL \ \ \ ) EASTBANK, LLC MINOR SUBDIVISION A SUBDIVISION OF PARCEL 2A OF EASTBANK, LLC LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN THE S 1 /2 SECTION 35, L a: Y JAllllAROll fAlllLY LLLP 4'115 HWY. 82 Gl.ENWDOD SPRINGS, co 81801 TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 89 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M. COUNTY OF GARFIELD, STATE OF COLORADO ( \ \ I \ I \ I \ WAREHCUSE INVESTMENT \ I 111f~:i~E ', _..__\_C1£'1ENNE._ WY 82001-\ \ . : " Cl~ ~~~ ~i ~ LOT3 1S.944:tAc. PARCELt EASTBANK LOT SPLIT RECEPTION N0.770438 6 •123'33°29° R •1150.00' L •1401.72' T •1211.18' CB•Sll1 '54'29"E ~ IRONBRIDGE GOLF COURSE WESTBANK FILING I D£I'AILB SCAI.£: 1° = 30' __ , \ 30• AIXESS '\\\\/- \ LOT 3 \ \ -e--.. _ .. _ .. LOT 2 PARCEL EASlBANK PARC£l.'1B - REC. NO. 813~~T SPLIT \~ s RQARlllG FORK RIVEll /---__ !_.-------~-,,, ~---~ ----- ,,,----- ../ D£I'AILA SCALE: 1' m 30' LINE L1 L2 L3 l4 LS LD L7 L8 l.9 L10 l11 L12 · L13 L14 L15 L16 L17 L18 L19 l20 L.21 L22 L23 L.24 L.25 l26 L27 L28 L29 L30 l.31 l.32 L33 l.34 l.35 L36 L37 l.38 l.39 l40 CURVE TABLE CURVE I RADIUS DEL TA I LENGlH I TANGENT I QiORD BEARING I OiORD C1 I 745.00' 14"25'00° r1a7.4B' I 94.24' 1 se4"2s'o7"w 11ss.aR' C2 I 1!'1t7nri' i7's5" I 193.24' I ee.75' I Nos·45•21·w I 1e3.11· C3 I 838.00' .45' r 47.a2' r N1210·22-w-1 es ...... C4 I 300.00' .o<nR'~~ ~en• I &-. -r.n-I h1?,4•44'53'"W I 1n .. rw:.• C5 I 45.""' 1617'~-· n'7' I ?a 39' I N70'2B'54"1" I 49.21' C6 I 200;00• 1-.A' ... -; llA' I CA tn' I c::RA..,01'1.a"w I 1nA. .L"' C7 I soo.oo· 111·0.~· :1.84' I 112.20' I N83"56'57"E 1220.58' ca 1 .,..,,nn• '5'08'41° a 57' I 55.811' I S81'59'07"W 1108."a' C9 I 250.oo· :-i-·#'06" 07:93' I 54.82' I N81.47'50"E J 107.0ll' C10 I 100.00• 1.::*":lA.•AA• 324.73' I 165.34' I S80'52'30"W H21.R'I' C11 I '71'V'\11ft1 . ..,,.,~ 'IUI:' I II c-..• I C1Ra-m:.,.•13•w ( 11.nA' C12 I 257.79' •e·41•44• l 134.12' I 88.50' I 560"21'"4~ In .. C13 I 1ao~cxi' A.o;'?R'nA" f 142.84' I 75,42' I N81'58'22"W I 1J9,1n' C14 I 2so.oo• 13"41'34" IM:i2': I JJ,8'7'ljljj2_"2J'J2°W I 88 7a• C15 I 125.oo' ......,4•57• I 83.08' I 43.14'. I N81.42'17"E I 81:5&' C16 I 1 se.00• 'n"'"'H0 I 07.82'-r5o.21'1 S8411'54"W I 98.27' ffi ~8 !O ~ ~~~~ ~8~~ ~~ 0) 8 --'ilio8 fii. ~ ~~~~ ~~~~~ ;i "' --'m :!: u ~ ~ :> ~ ~ iii ~ ~ 0 ci z ti ~ z .. ~ 11. t5 I ii!;~ Ill .. ma :E ~ ~B~ ~ B ~i~ ~ Z ~12 u; 111 Ill <11;1 ~ ~ ~Q 1· '""m~8a z .... ~ :::>; !! 0 .. 15!j! u ~ :c ii. " i 0 ~ z~ ~~ ~aa :i~ ~~~ ~z Zmz n ~~a w ~z9 Ii: illl ~ ii: ~ ~ " PROJECT NO. .ZtSIOOS.00 20F2 STANDARD BACTERIOLOGICAL WATER TEST SNOWMASS WATER & SANITATION DISTRICT P.O. BOX 5700 -SNOWMASS VILLAGE, CO 81615 PWS ID# sample Locallon E: ~f h:tn "- SAMPLE TAKEN : DATE lfl'J.1 f16 TtME ~NAMEOFSUPPLY &el l -/r:if 2... COUNTY fig,(' SAMPLER C • ~ CHLORINE RESIDUAL __ MGIL ( ) COMMUNITY SUPPLY ( ) ROUTINE DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM SUPPLY ( ) NON COMMUNITY ( ) CHECK SAMPLE ( ) PROCESS WATER ( ) OTHER PUBLIC ( ) RAW (')Q GROUND { ) SURFACE Q(I PRIVATE ( ) SPECIAL PURPOSE SAMPLE .. NOTE· IF ALL . NFORMATION IS NOT SUPPLIED. THE SAMPLE WILL BE DISCARDED. see REVERSE FOR TI ME LIMITATIONS. SAMPL\f.IG INSTRUCTIONS ANO DEFINffiO.!:lrS. coevj@ w Y'tAltf wa,r~r. ~~:~KS : 'f1t> -q45 11-~ U C.(J7YI • ~~:l~ fllll!ft/pt!jfe i ::: ~ '"""'""'" ffE """"'""a <_ FOR TEST ANALYST/FINISH ~ COLIFORM E.COLI RESULTS ~-· PRESENT PRESENT COLIFORM E.COLI MPN~--~----~~----~ MPN-~-~-~--~-- DATE DATE DO NOT WRITE IN THIS SPACE 9 h-4(/fj TIME I '1:?? CJ '1 11 Cf,_/=-TIME 15 0 d RESULTS GREATER THAN ONE COLIFORM PER 'DO ML INDICATES NON-COMPLIANCE WITH MINIMUM DRINKING WATER STANDARDS RECEIVED ON TEST BOTTLE#: ___ ._/_~_?.......,_/ ________ _ Nicole Garrimone-Campagna, Esq. March 10, 2015 Garfield & Hecht, P.C. 420 Seventh Street, Suite 1000 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 RE: Eastbank, LLC – Lot 2 Existing Well Pumping Test Results Dear Nicole: This letter report presents the technical analysis of the water supply from the existing well located on the proposed Lot 2 of the Eastbank, LLC Minor Subdivision located within Parcel 2A of Eastbank Parcel 2 Lot Split in Garfield County, Colorado, as shown on Figure 1. A pumping test for the well was conducted by Resource Engineering, Inc. (RESOURCE) and Ray’s Well Done Pump Service, LLC (Ray’s) on March 3, 2015. A water sample from the well was also obtained during the pumping test. The results are presented below. SUMMARY The existing well on the proposed Lot 2 has a valid well permit (Permit No. 50236) issued by the Division of Water Resources. The well permit allows for a 4,000 square foot office/repair shop building, occasional truck washing, floor washing, and not more than 1,000 square feet of landscape irrigation. The maximum pumping rate allowed for the well is 15 gallons per minute (gpm), with the annual amount of groundwater to be withdrawn not to exceed 0.4 acre-feet. The well has an estimated long-term yield of over 20 gpm based on a 4-hour pumping test and recovery data. The well water quality data will be available from the laboratory in a few weeks and a separate letter with the results and analysis will be prepared. The well has historically served the potable demands for a small office on the property, landscape irrigation, truck washing, and facility washing. WATER WELL Well Construction The well was constructed in 1967 by an unknown driller. The well is located in a concrete vault structure and is drilled approximately 70 feet deep. The well supplies water to two pressurized storage tanks and then to the office and maintenance shops. The well construction and test report is not available, so no other information on the well is known. The well appears to be drilled in an unconfined alluvial aquifer that is extensive and hydraulically connected to the Roaring Fork River. The current water level elevation in the well is at approximately the same elevation as the Roaring Fork River. The water level in the aquifer fluctuates seasonally, depending on deep percolation from precipitation and irrigation. The water levels are at the lowest levels during the winter time and will rise as snow melt occurs and flood irrigation begins. The pumping test was conducted when the water levels are seasonally at their lowest levels. Therefore, it is anticipated that the water levels will not significantly drop from their current levels, due to the influence of the Roaring Fork River on the aquifer. Nicole Garrimone-Campagna, Esq. March 10, 2015 Page 2 Pumping Test A pumping test was conducted on March 3, 2015, for the well. The purpose of the test was to determine the long-term yield of the well and its adequacy to serve the existing uses (or future uses) for a Garfield County (GARCO) Land Use Application to create a minor subdivision. The initial static water level was measured at 33.35 feet below the top of casing (TOC) as shown on Figure 2. The pumping rate was initially set at approximately 20 gpm to stress the well and the flow rate continued for the entire duration of the test. The well had a total drawdown of 0.28 feet as shown on Figure 3. The final water level at the end of the pumping part of the test was 33.63 feet. The test was terminated after 4 hours of pumping (the minimum pumpin g test length required in the GARCO regulations) due to the limited drawdown and connection to the Roaring Fork River alluvium described below. Over the 4-hour pumping period approximately 4,800 gallons was pumped, resulting in an average pumping rate of 20 gpm. Analysis Figures 2 and 3 shows the water level in the well dropping minimally during the 4-hour pump test. The water level slowly dropped 0.28 ft. in the first 2 hours and remained relatively steady for the remainder of the test. Based on a total drawdown of only 0.28 feet, and the hydraulic connection to the Roaring Fork River, RESOURCE determined that the pumping test could be terminated after 4 hours. Figure 4 depicts the water level recovery in the well in the 5 minutes after pumping ceased. T represents the total time since the pumping test started and T’ represents the time since pumping stopped. The well reaches complete recovery at T/T’ equals more than 2 (8 hr/4 hr), which means the well recovered faster than the rate at which the well was pumped. This indicates that, at the time of the test, the well completely recharged at a rate equal to or more than the 20 gpm average pumping rate. The well is capable of producing more water than the permitted pumping capacity of 15 gpm. Well Location The permitted location for the well is the NW ¼ of the SE ¼, of Section 35, Township 6 South, Range 89 West of the 6th P.M. at a point approximately 1700 feet from the south section line and 1950 feet from the east section line. The actual location of the well was located from a site visit using aerial photography. The actual location is approximately 180 feet from the permitted location as shown on Figure 1. The Division of Water Resources requires wells to be constructed within 200 feet of their permitted location. WATER QUALITY RESOURCE collected one water quality sample from the well water during the pumping test. The sample was shipped by overnight delivery under proper chain of custody to National Testing Laboratories. The results will be available in a couple of weeks. RESOURCE will prepare a letter summarizing the results when the data is available. Nicole Garrimone-Campagna, Esq. March 10, 2015 Page 3 CONCLUSION The results from the pumping test and water sampling indicate that the well has an adequate yield to serve the existing uses on the proposed Lot 2. The yield is estimated to be at least 20 gpm, which exceeds the permitted pumping rate of the well. RESOURCE will provide the results and analysis of the laboratory data when it is available. Please call if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, RESOURCE ENGINEERING, INC. Michael J. Erion, P.E. Water Resources Engineer MJE/mje 1325-17.1 Attachments !(Lot 2 Eastbank, LLC Lot 2 Well(Permit No. 50236) S82 Eastbank, LLC Minor Subdivision Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS,USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GISUser Community Figure 1: Well Location MapEastbank, LLC ®0 800 1,600400 Feet Date: 03/10/2015File: 1325-17.1Drawn: RKMApproved: MJE Background: 2011 Aerial Photograph 1 in = 800 ft RESOURCE 909 Colorado Avenue / Glenwood Springs, CO 81601Voice: (970) 945-6777 - Web: www.resource-eng.com E N G I N E E R I N G, I N C. T6S R89W Figure 2 1325-17.1 03/05/2015 Prepared by RKM Approved by MJE 0 10 20 30 40 50 6030 32 34 36 38 40 1 10 100 1000 Fl o w R a t e ( g p m ) De p t h f r o m T O C ( f e e t ) Pumping Time (minutes) Eastbank, LLC Lot 2 Well Pumping Test Depth from TOC (feet) Static Water Level Depth of Water from TOC Flow Rate Static Water Level = 33.35 ft. Notes: 1) Initial Water Level: 33.35 ft. below Top of Well Casing 2) Final Water Level: 33.63 ft. below Top of Well Casing 3) Well Depth: 70 ft. from Top of Well Casing Pumping Rate = 20.0 gpm Figure 3 1325-17.1 03/05/2015 Prepared by RKM Approved by MJE 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 300.0 2.0 4.0 1 10 100 1000 Fl o w R a t e ( g p m ) Dr a w d o w n ( f e e t ) Pumping Time (minutes) Eastbank, LLC Lot 2 Well Pumping Test Drawdown (feet) Drawdown Flow Rate Drawdown after 4 hrs of pumping = 0.28 ft. Average Pumping Rate: 20.0 gpm Figure 4 1325-17.1 03/05/2015 Prepared by RKM Approved by MJE 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 1 10 100 Re s i d u a l D r a w d o w n ( f e e t ) T/T' (minutes) Eastbank, LLC Lot 2 Well Pumping Test Recovery Recovery Notes: 1) Well recharges at a rate equal to or greater than the average pumping rate when the well reaches fully recovery at T/T' equal to 2 (8hr/4hr) Well completely recovered in less than 2 minutes .. inrmt, __..-::: ------ - - - - - -::.------::.-:.:.:::::::::::>)<::" ------.....--:::: -----===-==-=:=-:::-:::..:::..::::..:=.:-:..:::::::.----- - - - - - ----------- LOT 2 EASTBANK MINOR SUBDIVISION OVERALL BOUNDARY MAP SCALE 1 "=200' LOT 1 LOT 2 FUTURE FlRE HYDRANT {IF REQUIRED BY THE GLENWOOD SPRINGS FlRE DEPARTMENT IN FUTURE BUILDING PERMIT REVIEWS) 2"¢ WATER SERVICE TO B CAPPED ONCE THE B" LINE IS CONNECTED TO THE ROARIN FORK WATER AND SANITATION DISTRICT MAIN INSTALL FUTURE TRANSFORMER REPLACE EXISTING SERVICE WITH 2"¢ SERVICE TO TEMPORARILY---.l SERVE BOTH BUILDINGS EXISTING WELL TO BE ABANDONED ONCE THE CONNECTION TO THE FUTURE ROARING FORK WATER AND SANITATION DISTRICT SE~ .... ~6 ... ·~ END TELEPHON ~,~ ' ~ 4l!"¢ SANITARY AND GAS ~ \ SEWER MANHOLE INSTALLATION .l" INSTALL TEMPORAR~ ~ 1,500 GALLON ONE CHAMBER NORWESCO TO BE PUMPED BY TRUCKS UNTIL THE CONNECTION TO THE FUTURE SANITARY SEWER MAIN TO THE SOUlHEAST 1~ tY'IUPl~TFn FUTURE GAS/TELEPHONE/ELECTRIC SERVICE TO BE FROM THE FUTURE LINES COMPLETED AS PART OF THE SCHOOL DISTRICT ACCESS ROAD CONSTRUCTION I I ~ rJ .•. '·'· '·'· '·'· 1; :: .:: .:: .:: .:: .:: .:: .:: .:: ·. w w ___ ,. ___ _ • ---11----I --OE----OE ---T----T • +Cf 0 8S • I OE T LEGEND Ill EXISTING ASPHALT PAVING PROPOSED BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING PROPOSED GRA va CONCRETE PROPOSED 8" CLASS 52 DUCTILE IRON PIPE PROPOSED 1.5", 2", OR 4" WATER SERVICE PROPOSED 8" ¢ SDR 35 PVC SEWER MAIN PROPOSED 4"¢ PVC SEWER SERVICE PROPOSED GAS SERVICE (SIZING ANO MATERIAL PER BLACK HIUS ENERGY) PROPOSED ELECTRIC SERVICE EXISTING OVERHEAD ELECTRIC PROPOSED TELEPHONE SERVICE 4l!"¢ SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE WATER SERVICE CURB STOP PROPOSED STORM SEWER PIPE PROPOSED DRYWELL NOTE: UTILITIES LINETIPES SHADED GREY ARE SHOWN SCHEMATICALLY FOR FUTURE CONSTRUCTION. FUTURE 8"¢ WATER LINE TO BE EXTENDED WITH THE SCHOOL DISTRICT ACCESS ROAD CONSTRUCTION GRAPHIC SCALE ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 30 ft. --------------------~--- EXISTING ELECTRIC SERVICE _... _... --" URCE TO BE MAINTAINED _.-_... ~ AND METERED TILL FUTURE .-_... _... ------__...-rft--- ELECTRIC CORRIDOR IS - -_... .---:::>< - ---------------~5;'.t:~~DS~VI~~ ~gu;E------------------~oo ------ - - -- - - - - - _ _ _ _ _ INST&-LEilJ.N--8AM!"1'R'E:NCH -- - -o,£. --- - ----------___... ----0 --- MAIN IS COMPLETED _...--..---.-----~~ ----~ -_.,. -----.-.--DE --- .-_,. ---------oE ----~o<---------~-=--or.::::="' ------------~ -------------..... ---,,.,---------------~ -- - - - - - - --==-==-=-~--= --DE ·U~ ~ .-----DE----~ oE----DE ,,,,..,--// OE~ DE-------- _.-aE---- -------- OE ---.-c:c:::.l''°" ----o<----------------- z 0 Ui ~ 0:: ci z Cl 0:: ~Cl ~ " ~~ " 0:: ~ tO 6 :J ::;: lb w w !( ~ " ii: PROJECT NO. 2151007.00 MU EASTBANK, LLC – VETERINARY CLINIC APPLICATION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW RESPONSE TO STANDARDS IN SECTION 7 DIVISION 1. GENERAL APPROVAL STANDARDS. 7-101. Zone District Use Regulations The Property is in the County’s Rural zone district. The Rural district encompasses rural residential areas, agricultural resource lands, and agricultural production areas. The Veterinary Clinic will serve a currently underserved veterinary market in the Roaring Fork Valley, especially as it pertains to equ ine specialist services. The Rural district permits a Veterinary Clinic by Administrative Review. 7-102. Comprehensive Plan and Intergovernmental Agreements The proposed land use is generally in conformance with the Garfield County Comprehensive Plan. A more detailed analysis is attached. 7-103. Compatibility The nature, scale, and intensity of the proposed use is compatible with adjacent land uses. Adjacent land uses including a contractor’s yard and a Fed Ex warehouse and distribution facility. The intended use is an equine surgeon, who will keep 3–5 horses on site per day. The facility will not emanate noise or odor, and is consistent and compatible with surrounding land uses. The proposed use will generate less traffic than the existing land use. 7-104. Source of Water The Property has physical and legal water supply. Attached is a letter from Sara Dunn at Balcomb & Green, P.C. demonstrating that the proposed use will have physical and legal water supply. 7-105. Central Water Distribution and Wastewater Systems The Code requires that “every effort shall be made to secure a public sewer extension.” (7- 105). Public water and sewer are not yet available to the site, but we anticipate it will be forthcoming in the next 12 months. The Roaring Fork Water & Sanitation District (“RFWSD”) has initiated the process to bring potable water and sanitary sewer to the site to serve the new RE-1 K–8 school to be constructed on a nearby property and the surrounding properties, including this one. Based on discussions with District representatives, the District believes that water service will likely be available by late-summer/early fall of 2016 and sewer service will likely be available by mid-2017. The RFWSD’s extension of these utilities will, of course, be dependent upon County approval of its amended service plan, which seeks to include this site and surrounding properties into the RFWSD’s service area and inclusion of the site within the RFWSD’s taxing area. Connection to the RFWSD’s infrastructure will also be contingent upon permitting approvals for the facilities, including a lift station south of the site, payment of tap fees by the Applicant to the RFWSD, and installation of the necessary infrastructure to connect to the RFWSD’s facilities pursuant to its rules and regulations at the Applicant’s cost. The Applicant understands that the RFWSD planned infrastructure will have the capacity to serve 350 EQRs on the site, which will be more than adequate for the proposed use. Applicant proposes to install a temporary septic tank on the property to serve the veterinary clinic, as well as the vehicle repair shop in the existing building. Plans call for a temporary installation of an underground 1,500-gallon single chamber Norwesco Bruiser septic tank. The sewer lines will be fitted and sized in anticipation of connecting to the RFWSD main line when it becomes available. This temporary system will be pumped regularly, likely once per month. Applicant will then connect to the RFWSD line within three months of its construction, or as otherwise permitted or required by RFWSD. If, for some reason, RFWSD utilities are not available within the next 2 years, applicant will work with the County to construct a conforming on-site wastewater system. This means the property will be served at all times by a water and wastewater distribution system that is adequate to serve the proposed use. 7-106. Public Utilities Adequate public utilities are available to serve the proposed land use. 7-107. Access and Roadways The property is adjacent to Highway 154 and has a driveway entrance off of Highway 154. The property is located just south of the intersection of Highway 82 and Highway 154. Access to the site was formally approved during the Fed Ex application. Attached is a traffic impact analysis which indicates that this application, together with the vehicle repair shop application, will cumulatively generate 1/3 of the traffic of the existing waste option on the site. 7-108. Use of Land Subject to Natural Hazards The property lies outside identified slope, soils and surficial hazard areas according to the Garfield County Geologic Hazard GIS. Additionally, the geotechnical investigation performed by HP -Geotech did not identify any hazardous conditions. 7-109. Fire Protection The proposed land use has adequate fire protection. DIVISION 2. GENERAL RESOURCE PROTECTION STANDARDS. 7-201 Agricultural Lands The proposed use does not impact agricultural operations. In fact, the existence of an equine surgeon will likely enhance agricultural operations in the Valley. 7-202 Wildlife Habitat Areas Applicant has notified the Colorado Division of Wildlife that it will be commenting on the application. Given that the proposed use does not disturb any land which was not already disturbed by the industrial operations on the parcel, and is much less intense generally, there is little, if any, impact on wildlife. 7-203 Protection of Waterbodies There are no waterbodies on the property. 7-204. Drainage and Erosion Attached is a grading and drainage plan. 7-205. Environment Quality The proposed use will not cause air quality to be reduced below acceptable levels, and will not adversely impact water quality. 7-206 Wildfire Hazards The site is not in an elevated Wildfire hazard zone. 7-207. Natural and Geologic Hazards A geotechnical investigation completed by HP-Geotech is attached. 7-208. Reclamation Applicant will reclaim any disturbed areas according to Garfield County standards. DIVISION 3. SITE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. 7-301. Compatible Design The site plan is compatible with the existing character of adjacent land uses and will comply with Section 7-301. 7-302. Off-Street Parking and Loading Standards The proposed use will comply with Section 7-302. Attached is the site plan which depicts parking on the property. 7-303. Landscaping Standards Attached is a landscaping plan in compliance with 4-203(F) and 7-302. 7-304. Lighting Standards The project will comply with the lighting standards of Section 4-203(D). 7-305. Snow Storage Standards The proposed use will comply with Section 7-305. 7-306. Trail and Walkway Standards Section 7-306 does not apply to the proposed use. DIVISION 6. ADDITIONAL STANDARDS FOR AGRICULTURAL AND ANIMAL RELATED USES. 7.601. Animal Sanctuary – N/A 7.602. Animal Processing – N/A 7.603. Kennels – N/A 7.604. Veterinary Clinic The Veterinary Clinic will comply with 7-604. No noise will emanate from the property boundary in excess of the Residential Zone District standards contained in C.R.S. § 25-12-103. All operations will occur inside the building, with the exception of sporadic evaluation and rehabilitation outdoors adjacent to the building. All animals will be housed indoors during the night. Project: Eastbank Equine Hospital (“Veterinary Clinic”) Owner: Eastbank, LLC Property Location: 3927 County Road 154 (the “Property”) Garfield County Comprehensive Plan 2030 (the “Comprehensive Plan”) Analysis. The Comprehensive Plan was adopted on November 10, 2010, and last amended on October 9, 2013. The applicant is requesting a permit to construct a new building, consisting of approximately 4,000 square feet, to house an equine hospital or Veterinary Clinic on approximately 2 acres of a larger 16.983 acre parcel. RELEVANT SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Overall Vision of Garfield County: OVERALL VISION: Garfield County is dedicated to managing and directing growth to dedicated Urban Growth Areas and other areas that can accommodate growth cost effectively, in order to create thriving communities while promoting a diverse, sustainable and healthy economy, protecting wildlife, maintaining or improving the quality of our natural environment, and preserving the county’s rural and western heritage.1 Applicant Comment: The Property is located in Rural Garfield County, but is within the City of Glenwood Spring’s Urban Growth Area. The Comprehensive Plan acknowledges widespread public support that encourages a significant portion of future growth to occur in and adjacent to municipalities.2 In 2011, Glenwood Springs committed to development southward on Hwy 82 and extended its Urban Growth Boundary to include the Property.3 The County followed suit by designating this area for urban development. According to the City and County’s comprehensive plans, it is intended that these properties within the Urban Growth Boundary be annexed into the city at some point in the future.4 Preservation of Garfield County’s Rural Character: To preserve the Rural Character of Garfield County, Comprehensive Plan states goals of 1) promoting the continuation and expansion of agricultural uses; 2) preserving a significant rural character; and 3) preserving scenic and visual corridors in the county.5 The Comprehensive Plan further states that, as agricultural properties have been converted to suburban residential properties, the loss of rural character impacts one of the assets and appeal of 1 See Comprehensive Plan, p. 21. 2 See Comprehensive Plan, p. 37. 3 See Glenwood Springs Comprehensive Plan, Adopted March 2011, p. 3. 4 See Glenwood Springs Comprehensive Plan, p. 30. 5 See Comprehensive Plan, p. 56. Garfield County.6 Agriculture is strongly associated with the western heritage and rural image of the unincorporated areas of the county.7 Farm and ranch operators have been diligent stewards maintaining the most significant landscapes, enjoyed by residents and visitors.8 Applicant Comment: Rural and Agricultural communities are closely associated with large animals, such as horses, and their associated activities. The proposed development of the Veterinary Clinic, will provide a service to those members of the rural and agricultural community. Many land owners choose to not develop their land, specifically because of their hobbies associated with and their enjoyment of large animals. The proposed Veterinary Clinic, while located in an Urban Growth Area, is centrally located to serve a rural county that remains largely agricultural with an abundance of large animals. In order to preserve Garfield County’s rural character, it is necessary to continue to have the services to support the agricultural character of Garfield County, or else risk development and the loss of our rural character. Rural Land Uses Outside of Glenwood Springs but within the Urban Growth Area: Garfield County’s Comprehensive Plan “reinforces a major direction of the previous plan: most new growth should occur in areas that have, or can easily be served by, urban services.”9 Here, the Property is within the Urban Growth Area serviced in between Glenwood Springs and Carbondale. Applicant Comment: The Property is currently being used as a truck repair and maintenance facility with outside storage of up to 30 vehicles. The proposed Veterinary Clinic site sits on a largely undeveloped and vacate lot, the development promotes employment and commerce. The Property lies within the Glenwood Springs Urban Growth Boundary, is adjacent to Ironbridge, and near several other proposed and future residential developments. In addition, the Property is located directly adjacent to the Property occupied by FedEx. The Property has excellent highway access, as it is adjacent to a good county road alongside Highway 82. The Property is also flat and does not have topographic constraints. Promote Sustainable Economic Diversity: The Comprehensive Plan states as its overall vision that it should promote a diverse, sustainable and healthy economy.10 The Comprehensive Plan believes that there is a need for economic diversity, as mineral and energy development is subject to severe boom/bust cycles. Thus, efforts must be undertaken to continue to diversify the local economy by bolstering economic diversity.11 Therefore, community strengths and assets should be considered while determining 6 See Comprehensive Plan, p. 18. 7 See Comprehensive Plan, p. 55. 8 See Comprehensive Plan, p. 55. 9 See Comprehensive Plan, p. 21. 10 See Comprehensive Plan, p. 41. 11 See Comprehensive Plan, p. 17. the appropriate mix and type of businesses and industries that would be attracted to Garfield County. Applicant Comment: Garfield County should move to diversify the economy by creating a community where employers/employees want to live, creating opportunity for new and expanding local businesses, attracting diverse businesses and industries, quality development, and actively seeking targeted businesses. Construction of the Veterinary Clinic offers an important service to Garfield County, providing a service to rural, agricultural, and other property owners that enjoy or utilize large animals. It adds to the area’s economic diversity and business mix by attracting and employing veterinarians with specialized knowledge, creating infrastructure, as well as providing a necessary service to the area. It will also provide a boon to local developers when constructing the approximately 4,000 square foot facilitiy. Allocation of Developable Land: The Comprehensive Plan recognizes the need for existing municipalities to be able to gradually expand into immediately surrounding areas.12 The county supports and encourages orderly expansion of existing communities. This Comprehensive Plan recognizes existing municipal plans and strongly supports and encourages infill and redevelopment of existing communities.13 Applicant Comment: The Property in question has already been subject to development, and further development of the Veterinary Clinic will only make the surrounding area a more desirable community. This development will provide needed services in a centralized location, close to the population but within the rural community of the Roaring Fork Valley. Other Goals & Policies from the Glenwood Springs Comprehensive Plan Pertinent to the Application: Policies to Enhance Economic Development: The Development maintains the Comprehensive Plan’s stated goal of encouraging the growth of institutions that educate the county workforce.14 The Veterinary Clinic will promote the influx of an educated and needed workforce, to what is an underserved and needed specialty in Garfield County. Environmental Impacts: Garfield County includes a multitude of sensitive ecosystems, including riparian and wetlands resources, wildlife habitat and important visual corridors.15 There is a desire to ensure that future development balances the need for economic development with policies to ensure minimum impact on sensitive environments. The existence of a Veterinary Clinic will encourage the continued use of open space and agricultural land. 12 See Comprehensive Plan, p. 22. 13 Id. 14 See Comprehensive Plan, p. 51. 15 See Comprehensive Plan, p. 19. Policies to Enhance Economic Development:  The County should encourage the development of a well-trained workforce.16  The County should continue to make improvements that enhance the community’s services and that make Garfield County a place that is attractive for new businesses and their employees.  The County should encourage new businesses that provide necessary services to its populace, which will encourage less commuting.17  The County should actively pursue businesses and industries whose operations and products are compatible with Garfield County’s stated goals and vision.18 Allocate Adequate Land: Adequate land for new industries and businesses is limited within city limits. However, land within the Urban Growth Boundary is more suitable for businesses that require additional acreage, such as this Property and proposal.19 Private Property Rights: Garfield County recognizes that owners have an inherent right to develop property as long as the development is in the best interests of the health, safety and welfare of the county and does not adversely affect adjacent property rights.20 Growth in Urban Growth Areas: Urban Growth Areas are the preferred locations for commercial and employment uses that can take advantage of supporting infrastructure and a close by client base that reduces travel demands.21 The Property’s location in an Urban Growth Area and in close proximity to both Glenwood Springs and Carbondale, as well as the surrounding agricultural open space that typically houses horses and other large animals, makes it an ideal site for this commercial operation. 16 See Comprehensive Plan, p. 51. 17 See Comprehensive Plan, pp. 41 & 45. 18 See Comprehensive Plan, p. 49 (Vision). 19 See Comprehensive Plan, p. 55. 20 See Comprehensive Plan, p. 19. 21 See Comprehensive Plan, p. 22; see also, p. 38. Basalt Office: Glenwood Springs Office: Aspen Office: 211 Midland Avenue, Ste. 201 818 Colorado Avenue 0133 Prospector Road, Ste. 4102E Basalt, CO 81621 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Aspen, CO 81611 P.O. Box 790, Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 • (970) 945-6546 • www.balcombgreen.com Sara M. Dunn Direct Dial (970) 928-3467 Receptionist (970) 945-6546 sarad@balcombgreen.com May 13, 2016 Ms. Tamra Allen, Acting Director Community Development 108 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 RE: Water Supply Lot 2, Eastbank, LLC Minor Subdivision Dear Tamra: This letter summarizes the details of the water supply for Lot 2, of the Eastbank, LLC Minor Subdivision. All the uses on Lot 2 will be served by the existing well pursuant to the terms of a well sharing agreement and individual well permits. Water delivery to each facility will be separately metered to ensure compliance with the individual well permits. The car repair facility that will occupy the existing approximately 4,000 square foot building will be served pursuant to Well Permit No. 05023-F and Basalt Water Conservancy District Contract #312. Well Permit No. 05023-F was issued July 8, 1998 pursuant to C.R.S. § 37-90-137(2) and the uses are limited to drinking and sanitary purposes inside a 4,000 square foot office/repair shop building, occasional truck washing and floor washing, and not more than 1,000 square feet of landscaping irrigation. A copy is attached hereto. This well permit requires a valid contract (Contract #312) with the Basalt Water Conservancy District. According to the Basalt Water Conservancy District, Contract #312 is in full force and effect. The Equine Hospital will be served by the same well that serves the car repair facility. Eastbank, LLC has applied to the Basalt Water Conservancy District for an allotment contract and inclusion in its umbrella plan for augmentation adjudicated in Case No. 02CW77. A copy of the Application for Water Allotment Contract submitted by Eastbank, LLC to the Basalt Water Conservancy District is attached hereto. We anticipate that the Basalt Water Conservancy District will approve this request and issue a contract within the next 60 days. Once the Basalt Water Conservancy District contract has been issued, Eastbank, LLC will obtain a well permit for the uses associated with the Equine Hospital. We will supplement the Application with the Basalt Water Conservancy District contract, well permit, and well sharing agreement upon receipt. Ms. Tamra Allen May 13, 2016 Page 2 of 2 A water quality test was performed on the well on September 29, 2015 and it tested negative for Coliform and E.coli. The results of that test are attached hereto. The most recent well production pump test was performed on March 2, 2015. Over the 4-hour pumping period approximately 4,800 gallons were pumped, resulting in an average pumping rate of 20 g.p.m. A copy of the Well Pumping Test Results Letter from Resource Engineering, Inc. is also attached hereto. Please do not hesitate to call if you have any questions. Very truly yours, BALCOMB & GREEN, P.C. By: Sa r a M . D u n n ------------------------------------· - ;.; ··Forni No._ Gws:2s ., .. APPLICANT OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER COLORADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 816 Centennial Bldg., 1313 Sherman St., Denver, Colorado 60203 (303) 656-3581 WELL PERMIT NUMBER 050236 --------- DIV. 5 CNTY. 23 WD 38 DES. BASIN Lot: Bloek: Filing: Subdiv: APPROVED WELL LOCATION GARFIELD COUNTY LIC -E__-_ MD JOE & GERALDINE JAMMARON BOX 1631 NW 1/4 Twp BS SE 1/4 Section 35 RANGE 89 W 6th P.M, GLENWOOD SPRING CO 81602· DISTANCES FROM SECTION LINES (970)945-2554 1700 Ft. from 1950 Ft. from South Section Line East PERMIT TO USE AN EXISTING WELL ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT CONFER A WATER RIGHT CONDITTONS OF APPROVAL Section Line 1) This well shall be used in such a way as to cause no material Injury to existing water rights. The issuance of the permit does not assure the applicant that no injury will occur to another vested water right or preclude another owner of a vested water right from seeking relief In a civil court action. 2) The construction of this well shall be in compliance with the Water Well Construction Rules 2 CCR 402-2, unless approval of a variance has been granted by the State Board of Examiners of Water Well Construction and Pump Installation Contractors In accordance with Rule 18. 3) Approved pursuantto CRS 37-90-137(2) for the use of an existing well, constructed without a permit, appropriating ground water tributary to the Roaring Fork River, as an alternate point of diversion to the Basalt Conduit, on the condition that the well shall be operated only when the Basalt Water Conservancy District's substitute water supply plan, approved by the State Engineer, is in effect and when a water allotment contract between the well owner and the Basalt Water Conservancy District for the release of replacement water from Ruedi Reservoir is in effect, or under an approved plan for augmentation. BWCD contract #312. -- ----·-···· ----··-· -·-·---·--- ·4) The use of ground water from this well is lirnlted to drfnklng and sanitary pwposes Inside a 4,000 square foOI ollloefrepalr shop building, occasional llUck washing and floor washing, and not more than 1,000 square feet of landscape Irrigation. All use of · this well will be curtailed unless the water allotment contract or a plan for augmentation is in effect. t"'\\0 ,. ('a,o(~ 5) The maximum pumping rate shall not exceed 15 GPM. 6) The average annual amount of ground water to be appropriated shall not exceed 0"4 acre-fool (130,332 gallons). 7) A totalizing flow mater must be installed on this well and malmalned in good working order. Permanent records of all diversions must be maintained by the well owner (recorded at least annually) and submitted to the Division Engineer upon request. 8) The well must be located not more than 200 feet from the location specified on this perm~. 9) This well shall be located at least 600 feat from any existing well that is not owned by the applicant. 10) The owner shall mark the well In a conspicuous place with well permit number(s), name of the aquifer, and cou~ case nurnber(s) as appropriate. The owner shall take necessary means and precautions to preserve these markings. 11) This permit has been approved to withdraw an amount of water not to exceed 0-4 acre-foot and to be used as described in condition #4 above. You are hereby notWied that you have the right to appeal the issuance of this permit, by filing a written request with this office within sixty (60) days of the date of issuance, pursuant to the State Administrative Procedures Act (See Section 24-4-104 through 106, C.R.S.). $ 'lfi;;{qe APPROVED KJW Receipt No. n f v • _,4_1d_~_._ ~-1_._,_--___ c:;=)<Y ~-:&:· 0430382"""""';, •• , DATE ISSUED JUL Q 8 1998 ~PIRATION DATE JUL 08 1999 Rev. 03/13 APPLICATION FOR WATER ALLOTMENT CONTRACT BASALT WATER CONSERVANCY DISTRICT 1. Applicant(s) Contact Information a. Name: Eastbank, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company b. Mailing Address: 710 East Durant Ave., Unit W-6, Aspen, CO 81611 c. Street Address: 710 East Durant Ave., Unit W-6, Aspen, CO 81611 d. Telephone Numbers: 970-925-9046 e. Email Address: rmac@dunrene.com f. If Applicant is represented by an Attorney, please provide the Attorney's contact information, including name, address, telephone, and email: Sara M. Dunn, Esq. Balcomb & Green, P.C. P.O. Drawer 790 Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 970-945-6546 sarad@balcombgreen.com g. Emergency Local Contact Information, including n .ame, address, telephone, and email: Robert Macgregor, President of Dunrene Management, Inc., the Manager of Eastbank, LLC, contact information above. h. Contact Information of property manager, caretaker, irrigator, system . operator, or agent who should be provided a copy of this contract, including name, address, telephone, and email: Robert Macgregor, contact information above. 2. Type of land use (development) proposed for water allotment contract (i.e. single family home, subdivision, gravel pit, etc.): Equine hospital. Basalt Water Conservancy District Water Allotment Application Page2 3. Legal description and address of property on which District's water rights and/or contract water will be used (attach map and vesting deed with proof of ownership)*: Lot 2 as set forth and described by that certain Eastbank LLC Minor Subdivision Plat as recorded in the offices of the Garfield County Clerk and Recorder on September 8, 2015 as Reception No. 867717 (Drawer 20A), situated in the south half of Section 35, Township 6 South, range 89 West of the 6th P.M. in Garfield County, Colorado. A copy of the Plat is attached hereto. 4. Elevation of property: x 6-7,000 ft., 7-8,000 ft., 8-9,000 ft. ------- 5. Name and legal description of water supply diversion point(s): Name of Diversion: Eastbank Well No. 2. Type of Diversion: Well (e.g., a well, spring, ditch, pipeline, etc.) Legal Description: NWl/4, SEl/4, Section 35, Township 6 S, Range 89 W, of the 6th Principal Meridian, at a location 1,700 feet from the South Section Line and 1,950 feet from the East Section Line. UTM Coordinates (NAD 83/ Zone 13): Northing: 4372904.7 Easting: 302757.7 If diversion point is a well, please provide the Well Permit No. Well permit will be obtained once the contract is issued. Well Permit No. 050236-F Is the well operationa]/active? _X __ Yes, ___ No Is there currently an operating well meter? _X __ Yes, ___ No Notice: A valid well permit with operating well meter will be required under the contract. 6. Legal Water Supply: (please check one) Basalt Water Conservancy District Water Allotment Application Page 3 X Applicant requests consideration by the District to be included in the District's Umbrella Plan for Augmentation decreed in Case No. 02CW77. * *Note: Certain applicants may qualify to be included in the District's Umbrella Plan at the District's discretion. In order to be included in the District's Umbrella Plan, the Applicant's depletions must occur within the District's defined "Area A" and the Applicant must reimburse the District its pro rata share of the District's expenses in obtaining the Umbrella Plan decree. Costs of reimbursement are contingent upon location and intensity of the uses, and range from $1,200 for contractees with less than 2 units (EQRs) in certain areas, to $5,000 for more than 8 EQRs in Area A-3 (generally the Roaring Fork drainage above its confluence with the Fryingpan Rivers). __ Applicant will obtain its own plan for augmentation by applying to the Water Court, Water Division 5 within 2 years of this application. If Applicant has already applied for its own change/approval of plan for augmentation, the Water Court Case Number is: --------- 7. Proposed waste water treatment system: (please check) __ Tap to central waste water treatment facility X Septic tank/leachfield system __ Evapotranspiration system Other: 8. Proposed use of water (please check) Domestic/Municipal (single family home(s), duplex(s), condominium(s), mobile home(s), apartment). Please complete page four of this application. __ X_ Commercial (hotel, office, warehouse, restaurant, bar, retail). Please complete page five of this application. __ Industrial (gravel pit, manufacturing). Please complete page six of this application. __ Agricultural (crop irrigation, stock wateripg). Please complete page seven of this application. Date on which the county or other applicable governmental entities approved the land use for which you seek legal water service: Approvals Pending. (Note: Copy of the Resolution of other documentation evidencing such approval should be submitted with application.) Basalt Water Conservancy District Water Allotment Application Page .4 9. What other water rights are associated with or used on the property? None. 10. What other uses of water occur on the property? The Eastbank Well No. 2 currently serves the drinking and sanitary purposes inside a 4,000 square foot office/repair shop building, occasional truck washing and floor washing and not more than 1,000 square feet of landscape irrigation pursuant to Well Permit No. 050236-F and Basalt Water Conservancy District Allotment Contract No. 312. Please complete the section below if you selected domestic/municipal use on Page 3, No.8 DOMESTIC/MUNICIPAL WATER USES In-House Single family residential home(s) Number of Units: ------ Duplex(s) Number of Units: ------ Condominium(s) Number of Units: ------ Apartment(s) Number of Units/Rooms: --- Mobile Home(s) Number of Units: ------ Irrigation (lawns, parks, open space) Total area to be irrigated _____ Sq. Ft. or ____ Acres Type of irrigation system (please check) ____ Sprinkler _____ Flood (irrigation ditch) Domestic stock watering (cattle, horses) Number of animals: Basalt Water Conservancy District Water Allotment Application Page 5 Period of use (months): Other domestidmunicipal uses not listed: Please complete this page if you selected commercial use on Page 3, No. 8 COMMERCIAL WATER USES In-House Hotel: Office(s), square footage: Warehouse/distributor, square footage: _______ _ Retail, square footage: Restaurant, number of seats: -----------~ Bar, number of seats: Irrigation (lawns, parks, open space) Total area to be irrigated 1,300 Sq. Ft. or ____ Acres Type of irrigation system (please check) ____ Sprinkler ____ Flood (irrigation ditch) Other Commercial Uses Not Listed: A 4,000 Sq. Ft. equine hospital facility with four indoor stalls, a laundry facility, a full bath, break room with a sink, and possibly an Aquatred hydrotherapy unit. The facility is expected to have an average occupancy of 10 animal nights per week and will be staffed initially with three full time employees and at full capacity the facility will have up to five full time employees. To be conservative, the water use estimates assume 100% occupancy rates and full staffing 365 days per year and assumes all indoor water use is 100% consumptive. Please see attached summary of uses attached hereto. Basalt Water Conservancy District Water Allotment Application Page6 Please complete this page if you selected industrial use on Page 3, No. 8 INDUSTRIAL WATER USES Please describe your industrial development in some detail: Irrigation (lawns, parks, open space) Total area to be irrigated _____ Sq. Ft. or ____ Acres Type of irrigation system (please check) _____ Sprinkler _____ Flood (irrigation ditch) Basalt Water Conservancy District Water Allotment Application Page 7 Please complete this page if you selected agricultural use on Page 3, No. 8. AGRICULTURAL WATER USE Irrigation Type of crop(s) (pasture, alfalfa, beans, etc.) and irrigation system: Crop: Acres: Sprinkler: Flood: Crop: Acres: Sprinkler: Flood: Crop: Acres: Sprinkler: Flood: Crop: Acres: Sprinkler: Flood: Stock Watering (cattle, horses) Number of animals: Months of use: Other agricultural uses not listed: ' • f J. • Basalt Water Conservancy District Water Allotment Application Page 8 STATE OF COLORADO COUNTYOF Go<M~\d VERIFICATION ) ) SS. ) I, Ro be(.\-('A4C~'l'f-<if < (name of Applicant or Applicant's duly authorized representative), bng~t duly sworn, upon oath, depose and state as follows: 1) I am the Applicant or a dµly authorized officer, manager, agent or attorney-in-fact for the Applicant for this Application for Water Allotment Contract; 2) I have read and know the contents of this Application; 3) The information contained herein is an accurate and complete description of the Applicant's intended use of the Basalt Water Conservancy District's water rights; 4) The Applicant acknowledges that the accuracy and truth of all statements in this Application are conditions of approval of this Application by the Basalt Water Conservancy District and of the Contract to be made pursuant to such approval; and 5) I acknowledge that this application shall be subject to the District's Water Allotment Contract as approved and issued by the Dis ·ct. Date: Y /z_ 'D // <P r I Subscribed and sworn before me this 2. '5~ day of _(-)--tp,_r_;..;_( ____ , 20 l.!!l_ by Bo1oe<i ~jce50< Witness my hand and seal. My commission expires: NATALIE ZANCANELLA NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF COLORADO NOTARY ID #20074036139 Uy CommisslOn Expir9S Seplember 24, 2019 Basalt Water Conservancy District Water Allotment Application Water Use Estimates for Equine Hospital Attachment Indoor Water Use in Gallons per Day: Horses -Full Occupancy at 4 per day using 12 gpd each 48 gpd Stalls -Washing/Cleaning at 4 per day using 20 gpd each 80 gpd Laundry Facility at an average of two loads per day 50 gpd each 100 gpd Workers - 5 full time employees at 35 gpd each 175 gpd Aquatread Hydrotherapy Pool at 100 gpd 100 gpd Total: 503 gpd at 365 days per year, total estimated water use: 0.563 AF per year. EASTBANK, LLC MINOR SUBDIVISION PLAT NOTES: A SUBDMSION OF PARCEL 2A OF EASTBANK, LLC LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN THE S 1 /2 SECTION 35, 1. BASS CF l£ARINGS fUR 1HJS SUR\t:Y IS A llEAllllG CF SW54°27"W llE11IEEN 11£ EAST WNmR CllHll (I' !ilCTIQll J5, A S1'0I€ 11 PlM% AND 1llE WEST QIJNITEll aF SfCl10I J5, A S1UIE FlllW II Pl.M:E AS 9ICl'llll ltEREllL 2. DATE aF lHIS 5111\'EY WAS MJGUST ZI, 2015. I.KAR IJNllS t.r.iEII 111 P£RFDRll 1ltlS SUR~ llERE U.S. SlllMY f'fET,PS 3. 1115 SJMY IS llASID ON RECEP110N ND. tll72li1, llEEP11CN NO. 097252. AN lll'ROVEllEllT SUl\'EY PUT PftEl'AllED BY II. DARREll. 1MlE. LS. NO. 1337 DAlDI: SEPIDllEll 17, 1111, 1ltE REl:ORDED PU'IS (I' E1IWI< RANOf All> -RAN0t. ROARING FIJI( TRANSPCIRTA'llCIN AUlHORl1Y RIGHT-IF-WAY SUR~ llAl'S PIEPAllED BY FARNSllORllt GR00P PR0oECT ND. -.7 SHEE1S 9 I< 10, 1HE EAS1llM« LDT llPUT llEl:ORDID AT RECEFllON ND. rnMJe, 11£ EAS1BANK PARCE. 2 IDT SPUT RECORIJBI AT RECfP1DI Ill. 111J4112 AND IXllll£llS FlllW 11 PLACE AS SH01N HEREON. 4. 1115 PRIPERTY IS Slll£CT 10 RESERVA'llON!;. RESIRICllOllS. aMJIAHlS AllD E'ASDIDllS aF R£CDllD al II Pl.ACE AHO ElCCD'TIONS 111 1l1l£ SHO~ IN 1HE 1l1l£ ClllU1llDIT PREPAR£11 BY STEWART 1l1l£ CUAR.IH1Y COlil'ANY, EFFtCmf: DAlE: MJCUST 11, 2015. (Fl.£ H\llBDI 512111). !I. foljy FUlURE LAND USE DC\El.O'MOrf APPUCAllOll PROPOSAi. llllH RESPECT 10 LDT 3 HEREOF !!HALL BE REQUIRED 10 PRO\'IDE ADEQUAlE ROAD ACCESS f'll! SUCH PROPOSm USES 5Ul'FICIENT TO SAllSFY lHEN APPl.JCAl!l£ GARflElJl COUNTY STANDARDS. I. CClNTRCL C1F NOXIOUS VEEDS IS lHE RE!PONSIBllJTY CIF lHE PROPERTY OWER. 7. HO OPDI HEAR1H sot.D-fl.El. FIR£Pl.M:[S 1111..L BE AlUIWEll ANY'lttERE i.tHIN THE Sl&lll/ISIOll. ONE NEW SQ.ID-FUEL BURNING STOVE AS DEFINED ll't CJU. 2r7-<IOI. ET.SEQ., AND T1£ REllUl.A'llOH$ PllOIM.GllTED 1HEREUlllER. wtLL BE AWl'M:IJ IN AHY DW£WNG UNIT. AU. DWEWHG UNITS 'MU. BE AU.OWED ,.,. UNRE5TRICIED NUMBER OF NAlURAI. GAS BURNING SllMS AND APPUANCES. !I. AU. EX1ERIOR LIGHTING SHAU. BE THE MlllMUM AMOUNT NECESSMY AND THAT AU. EXTERIOR LIGHllNG SHAU. BE DIREClED INWARD AND DOWNWARD, Tt!WAllDS lHE lll'ERIOR OF T1£ SIJBDIWllON, EXCEPT THAT PR<MSIONS MAY BE MADE TO AUDW FOR SAFETY LIGHTING lHAT GOES BEYOND 111£ PACIPfRTY BOUNDARIES. D. COl.DRADO IS A "RICHT-10-FARM• STAlE PURSUANT TO c.R.S. 35-3-11, ET. SEQ. l.ANDO\ltj£RS, RElllDENlS AND VlsrTCRS llUST BE PREPARED TO ACCEPT 1HE ACllVITIES. SIGH'IS. SOUNDS AND !llllB.LS OF GARf1El.D CCUN1YS AGRICUl. lURAI. 0P£RA 1IONS AS A NOR11AL AND NECESSARY ASPECT OF Lii/iNG IN A COUNTY Wlllt A S1RONG RURAL CHARACTER AND A HEAl.lHY RANCHING SECTOR. lHOSE Wl1H AN URBAN SENSITTlllTY UAY P£RCElllE SUCH ACllVlllES. SIGHlS. SOUND, AND Slla.1.5 ONl Y AS INalN-IENCE. E"fESOR£. NOISE AND ODOR. HOWEVER, STA 1E LAW AND COUNTY POLICY PROlllDE lHAT RANCHING, FARUINC AND OlHER AClllCUl.TURAL AClllllTIES AND OP£11ATTONS lllTHIN GARFIELD COUNTY SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED TO BE IMSANCES SD LONG AS OPERATED IN CONFORMANCE lllTH 1HE LAW AND II A NON-NEQJCEHT MANNER. lHERERlRE. AU. llUST BE PREPARED TO ENCOUNTER NOISES, ODOR, LIGHTS, llUD, DUST. SMDKE. Di£1o1CALS. MACHINERY CIN PUBUC ROADS. LIVESTOCK ON PUBLIC ROADS. STORAGE AND lllSPOSAL OF MANURE. AND 1HE APl'UCAllON IJY SP!!A'llNG Oft OTHEllWISE OF CHEUICAL FERTl.JZERS, SOL AUEJalUENT, HERBIQDE. AND PESTICIDES, AHY ONE OR MORE OF WHICH MAY NA1\JRAU.Y OCCUR AS PART CIF L£1lAL AND NClN-NEGUGENT AGRlCUl.'JUllAL OPERATICNS. ID. AU. 0MERS DF I.AND, V1E11!ER RANCH OR REllllENCE. HAVE CBUGATlONS UNDER STA1E LAW AND COUNTY RECIA.AllONS 'M1H REGARD 10 lHE MAJNT'EMANCE DF FElltES AND llll!IGA'IKlN Dl1D£S. CllN'IROUJNG ¥IEEDS. KEEPING UVE5TDCK AND PETS UNllEft CONTROi. USING PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE Wlllt ZONING. AND 01HER ASP£C1S OF USING AND llAINTADllNC PROP£111Y. RESDEMTS AND l.NIDO'MERS ARE ENCOURAGED 10 LEAllN AllOUT 'lle;E RIGHTS AND R£SPONSllllJT1E AN ACT AS GOOD NEIGHBORS ANO Oll2EHS OF 111E COUNTY. A GOOD INTR!XlUC'TORY SOURCE f'OR SUCH INF'llRUATlOll IS "A GUIDE TO RURAL U'llNC I< SUAU. SCALE ACRICUL1URE" PUT OUT BY 111E COLORADO STAlE UNlllERSITY EXTENSION omCE IN CARF1llD COUNTY. 11 . DOGS KEPT Oii 1HE PROPERTY SHAU. BE IN A fENC(D YARD OR ON A L£ASH TD PREVENT HAIWl3MOIT Of WIUlUFE. 12. FENCING ON 1HE PROPERTY SHALL COMPLY 'MTH lHE COLORADO PARKS AND WIUJUfE SPECIFICATTCJIS f'OR VllLDUFE-fRIENDLY FENCING. Tl. EHGINEEIHlESIGNED SEPTIC SYSTEMS ARE REQUIRED WllltN lHIS SUBDIVISION. 14. 1HE PROPERTY IS UNDERl.AIN BY EAGLE VAU.EY EVAPORllE, AND NUllEROUS SINIO!CUS AND SlllL-cou.APSE OCCURRENCES HAVE BEEN IDENTFIED lllTHIN ~AL THOUSAND FEET DI' THE SITE. SINKHCU:S. SUBSIDENCE AND GROUND DEFDRMA110N DUE TD COUAPSE CF SOLUTION CAVITIES AND VOIDS ARE A SERIOUS CONCERN IN 11£ EMU VN.JEf EVAPORl'IE. INFREQUENT SNKHOl.E FORllAllON IS Sl1LL. AN ACTIVE GEll.OOC PROCESS IN 111E ROARING FDRIC VAU.EY, AND GROUND SUBSIDENCE ll£lA TED TO 1HE DISSOWTICIN OF EVAPORllE BEDROCIC IS AN UNPREDICTAl!L£ RISK. 15. 1HE ACCE55 DRIVEWAY nia.t CA 1!54 TO LOT 1 DF THE EAS1llANK lllNOR SUBDIVISION MAY ONLY BE CCUBINED lllllt ACCESS TO LOT 2 OF THE EASTTIANK MllOR SUBDIVISION. 1HE ACCESS DRl'ltWAY FROM CR 154 TO LOT 1 SHAU. NOT BE COUllNED Wlllt lHE ACCESS TO ANY OlHER PARCEL OR LOT. 111. LOT 2 AND 3 5HA1.1. l)E\gDp A STDAll WATER llANACalDIT PLAN AT THE Tiii£ OF llEVEl..DPloENT OR REDEVEl.IJPMOIT. STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY FILE NO. St280 EFFEC11VE DATE: AUGUST t t, 20 IS SCHEDULE &PART 2 NOTES EXCEl'llONS 1 'llllOUQI I ~ STNIDARD 1l1l£ EXCEl'11Cllis. 10. 1HIS PROPERTY IS SUll.ECT TD RESERVATIONS AICl EXCEPllONS IH PATENTS. OR ACTS AUTTtORIZlNC 111£ ISSUANCE lHEREDF, INCl.JJDINC lHE RESERVATIONS OF THE RIGHT OF WAY FOR onatES OR CANALS CONS1RUC1ED 8Y TltE AlllHORITY CIF 1HE UNITED 5TAlES. AS RESERVm IN UNl'IEll STAlEll PATENT R£CDRDED llAY 2D. 11111 AT 11£CE!'llON NO. 21741. 11. 1H1S PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO REl!ERVA110NS ANTI EXCEPTIONS Ill PATEll'TS. OR AC1S AUlHCRIZING 1HE ISSUANCE lltEREOf', INQ..UDlllC THE RESSIVA TIONS OF THE RIGHT OF PRllPRIElUR OF A VEIN OR LlllE 10 EXTRACT AND RBIOVE HIS ORE 1HEREFR011 !HOUUl 11£ 5AUE BE FllUND 10 PENElRAlE OR INTEll!ECT 1HE PllOl!IE!I AS RESERVE> Ill UN1ED STATES PATENT RECORDED MAY 2D. 181111 AT RECEPTION NO. 21741. 12. EASOIENTS GRANTED TO THE UOUNTAIN STA'1ES 'IEIDHDNE AND 'IEl..ECRAPH COUPANY BY llSTRUllENT RECORDED AUGUST 21, 1821 AT RECEPTION ND. 105227, AND BY INST1IUMENT RECORDED .U.Y 13. um AT RECEP110N NO. 110547. EASalENT UD NllRlHEASIERI. y OF EXISllNO COLDRADD STAlE HIGHWAY 112 AICl DOES NOT AFFECT THE llUB..ECT PROPERTY. 13. EASEMENT GRANTED TD THE llOUNTAllt STA'1ES 'l!lll'HClNE AND 1EUDW'll CGIPANY BY INS!llUUEltT RECORDED OCTOBER 21. 1a. AT RECEPTIOH ND. 227425. EA!OIDIT U£S NORlHEASlERl.Y OF ~C CQ.DRADO STA1E HIGHWAY 12 AND DOES NC1T AFFECT 1HE llUB..ECT PROP£RTY. 14. 1ERM5. IDOTION5. PROlllSIONS. AGll!DIENTS AND OllUGATIONS AS CONTAINED IN GARFIELD COUNTY RESOUITION 111-J87 REC0RD£D DEC£llllER 22. 11111 AT RECel'TION ND. 322148. DOES NOT AFFECT K SUB.Elli' PRCl1'£1m'. 1~ 1B!MS, CONDITIONS. PROVISIONS. AGREDIENlS AND CBIJOATIONS AS CONTAINDl IN llARFIEIJI COUNTY RESOLllTION 83-122 RECaillED llAY 17. 111113 AT 11£CEPTION NO. 342137. IN SO fNI AS lHEY AFFECT 1HE !1111.ECT PROPERTY. 111. EASDIENT FOR WATER LINE flRNl1ED TD I.Ill .IAllMARON llY INSlRUllENT RECORDED FEBRUARY 15. 1985 AT RECEPT10ll NO. ~ IS SHO'llN HEREON BUT DCES HOT AFFECT 111E lll&ECT PROPERTY. 17. 1ERM5. CONDITIONS, PROWllONS. AGREEllEMTS AND OBUGA110NS AS CONTAINED II llARFIELll CCUNTY RESll.llTTON 87-92 REIXlRllED OCTOBER 7. 1897 AT RECEPTION NO. :514711D. IN SO FAR AS 1HEY AFfECT THE SUB.ECT PROPERTY. 111. AGRICU. TURE E!aOACHIENT UCEN£ IM1H THE ROARING RlAK lRANSPORTA TTON AUlHORITY AS SET FORTH BY INSlRUUENT RECORDED AUCll5T 22. 2llD5 AT RECEPTION NO. llllOll;J2. T1£ PORTION OF K AGRICULTURAL FED lHAT ENCROACHES INTO 1HE RFTA RIGHT-<F-WAY DOES NOT AFFECT lHE SUll.ECT Pll<l'ERTY. 10. RIGHT OF WAY FOR ROARINC Fall< TRANSIT MJTTtORITY OVER 1HE HOR1HEAS1iRLY SIDE OF Sl&ECT PROPERTY AS -ON THE PLAT OF ~ PARCEL 2 LDT SPUT, ACCORDING! TD ll£ Pl.AT 1HEREOF FUD JANUARY 111. 2D12 AT RE~TltlN NO. 1113402. IS SHOW HEREON. 20. RIGHT OF WAY FOR DITCH AS &HO'llll ON 111£ Pl.AT aF EAS11IANK PARCEi. 2 LOT SPUT, ACCORDIHG TO 1HE Pl.AT THEREOF FUD JANUARY 18, 2012 AT flECEl'llDN NO. 8134112. Dm:H IS SH0\111 HEREDN. 21. ANY lDSS OR DAMAGE ARISING fllOU THE FACT 111AT 1NE FENCE LIND ON OR NEAR THE BOUNDARY LINES OF T1£ SUB.ECT PROPERTY DD NOT COINCIDE 1M1H T1£ EXACT COURSES OF 1HE llOUNDAllY LINES, AS DISCLOSED BY THE Pl.AT OF EAS1BNIK PARCEL 2 LOT S'IJT, ACIXllDllG TD 111E Pt.AT 1ltEAEDF FUD JNruAllY 111. 2012 AT RECEPTlOll NO. 813402. IN SO FAR AS 1HIS EFFECTS 1HE !U8.ECT PROPERTY. 22. 1ERM5. CONDl110NS. PRllW!XJl5. AGREEMENTS Nil CIBUGATICllS AS CONTAINED IN EASEMENT AGREDIENT llllllt IKIARIN!; FORK SCHOOL ll1S1RICT, RE-1 AND KW GUlll'IDOD SPRINGS, U.C AS SET F'OllTH BY INS1RUllENT RECORDED .U.Y 23, 2015 AT RECEPTION NO. 80S78I. EASEllENTS NIE. Sli<NN HEREON. 23. THIS PROPERTY IS !1111.ECT TO RElnlJTICIN NO. 2015-41 ISSIJm 8Y lHE COUNTY OF GARFIELD, STAlE OF COLORADO BY INSTRUllDIT RECORDED AUCllST .1. 2015 AT RECEPTION NO. 1185313 AND IS A LAND USE CHANGE PERMIT. SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE L RODIE' P. 1C1SER. DO HEREBY CER1lfY 'IHAT I All A PmnSSONAL LAND SllRVE'llll LICENSED UNDER ll£ LAWS Of 1HE STA1E j{,,,~~=~IS.:r=-~~~~~™wi~~~~BY~AND IHlEll MY 9l'EIMilON AND CORR£1:1\.Y SHDIS THE LllCAllllN AND lllllEllSIDNS DF ntE um, EASEJIENT5 AND S1IElS DF ~'Ji~~ lHE SAME ARf: 5TN<ED UPCtl T1£ GIKUI> IN IXllPUANCE 111H APPUCAlll£ R£1lULA'llONS .. Wl1lESS TtHEREDF , HA\£ SET MY HAND AND SEAL lllS z~DAY Of Auce!JSir 201e. B'l:._,,,RODNEY,,,,.,,~~~ICISER.==,,....,.L.S.':"":'N0.::--:3821:==~5~~~~ 1517 II.AKE AVENUE. SUITE 101 GUJIWO(Q SPRllGS, CD 1111!D1 TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 89 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M. COUNTY OF GARFIELD, STATE OF COLORADO \~: ;\ ' . ., TITLE CERTIFICATE VICINITY MAP SCAL.£: 1" a 2,000' I, ROBERT C. AEEi_ ~~ Of ADVANCE TIT1E CDllPANY AS AGENT FOR SIEWART TIT1E CllARANTY COMPANY, DO HEREBT CERllFY THAT I HAVE EXAllNED 1HE llllE TO All LANDS SHOMI ll'Ool THIS PUT AND THAT lll1E 10 SUCH LANDS IS ~ IN EAST1IANIC W:. A Cll..DRADO l.lllTEII UAllUTY COMPANY, EIJZAllElH llACQiEtlCR IRREVOCA8I£ 1RUST DA'IEll D£CEllBER XI, 2000 AND fUlRA llACIJIEGOR IRREVDCABl£ 1RUST DATED DEaMBER 27. 2000. FREE AND a.EAR CF ALL LIENS AND ENOJMl!RANCES (INCl.JJDING MORTGAGES. DEEDS OF lRUST, .IJOGllEN'IS, EASEMEN'IS, CDNTRACiS AND AGREEMENTS OF RECORD AFFECTING lHE REAL PROPERTY II 1HIS Pl.AT), EXCEPT AS SET fDRlll OI THIS Pl.AT. DATEII lltl~AY Of A~!l ";t;; A.O. 2015. .Y AND NOT lllE ACCUIACY llF SURVEYS. CALal.AllONS AND DRAF1JNG PURSUANT 10 CJ!.S., 38-51-101 AND 102. ET SEQ. t;;2KJVY:f 2015. CERTIFICATE OF TAXES PAID L THE UNDERSIGNED, DO HER£BY CERTIFY ~T THE ENTIRE AllOUNT or TAXES AND ASSESSllENTS DIE AND PAYABLE AS OfAzr n 'Jb/f'i UPON AU. PARCllS Of REAL ESTA1E DESCM!ED DH TllS PLAT ARE PAID f'l.U. 1H"-~1 · fZ..oqsii~ DATED THIS ..J.J_ DAY CF ~'f A.I>,, 2015. f. OK30 20 B~~+bf:~ CLERK AND RECORDER'S CERTIFICATE THIS RI.Al WAS ~~DIN lliE OFFlCE Of THE a.ERK AND RECORDER OF GARFJEl.D COUNTY AT~Cl.OCK__Pt:J__. ON THIS l::!l:H... DAY A.O. 2015, AND IS DULY RECOROID ~l'lW/!I!. Zbll AS RECEPTION NO. of c!'f, ZI. DO ,ONFORMED CliRK AND RE<DDER COPY BY:rDEPiC'iilU~TY.,-~~~~~~~~~~- CERTIFICATE OF DEDICATION AND OWNERSHIP 1HE IJNDERSIQffD EAS11A111 LLC, A CQ.DRAOO 1.ArnD UA81U1Y COUPANY. EUZABOi MACCRECOR lllREVDCAlll£ 1RUST DA'IEll DEtUlllER 27, 200D AND Ft.ORA UACGllECIR 1RREYOC.181L 'lllUST DATED DEca&R 27, 2IXIO 11 FEE 5lllPI£ !F AU. lHAT REAL PR0PERTT SlnJA 1ED IN GAllFEJl CWNTY, DE5ClllBED AS FlllDWS: A PAl!al. aF l.Nll l.DCAltD ft 1HE SOU1l1 HALF rE SEC110H ~ TO..aiP I SallH, llNICE 89 1ES1(I'THE1111 PRINCIPAL llElllllAll. l'!llO NOR1HEllLY CF 1HE CENTElllM OF 1HE RQARINC Riie 11M11 AND S0111HIES1DILY OF 1HE llOARllG flllll( TRANSPORTATKJN MJTHCJaTY RIGHT-of-WAY AND Cll.lllADO STATE llQlllAY 12 RICHT-GF-WAY, llElllG 1K1!E PNITICUUllLY DESallllED AS FW.D'IS: BEGINllNG AT A PCINT Ill THE SWlHllESTERLY RIGHT-of-WAY OF ca.oRAD0 STAIE HIQlllAY 112. A REllAll AND CAP FOUND ~ PLAC£. (IHNCE 11£ 5CUTHWT ClllNER rE SAID !ilC1ION Jll, 11E11G A J 1/4" -CN'. llEAllS SJT44'52"E A DISTANCE CIF ZJ75.llll FEET); 1HENCE DEPAATIN; SAID RIQfT-<W-WAY 533'14'47"'1 A DISTANa: CF :llll..12 FEET 10 A ~ II T1£ aJl1ERLllE Of THE ROARING FORK RIVER; 1\tENCE M fOli.ONHG 111REE (3) COLllSES Al.llNG SAID CDITB!UNE OF 1HE ROMING FIJI( RMR: I. N7rM'38"W A lllSTANCE Of llDll.13 FEET; 2. S!T4!'22"W A DISTANCE OF Jil1.3! FEET: :S. 5!512'22"W A DISTANCE OF 170.00 FEET: 1HENCE llfl'MINi SAID CENlERlllE ND4•47'Je"W A DISTANCE OF 125.00 FEET; THEllCE S771l3'01"W A DISTANCE OF 241.82 FEET: 111ENCE 5153'-ISlll"W A DISTAllCE OF ».DO FEET; 'lllllCE SOO'OD'DCl"E A DISTANCE IF 22.42 FEET; ~CE S71"Jll'40"W A DISTANCE Of' 112. 7' FEET; 1IEtCf Al.lllG A TNfllENT CIJRVE lO 1ltE LEFT HAVNI A RADIUS Of 745.00 FEET, A c:EmRAL ANCU: rE 14"25'01", A DISTANCE CIF 11!7.4! FEET (OtclllDS ll£ARS S14'211'07"W A DISTANCE CIF 1-FEET); l!DCE S57'1J'34"W A DISTANCE OF 171.H FEET; THENCE S71"47'48"w A llSTANCE DF' 2211.114 FEET; 1HENCE ll7n0'20"W A DISTANCE !F :1911..56 FEET; 11£HCE ALONG A NDN-TANCell' CIJRVE 111 1HE Rll:HT llAWIG A RADIUS (I' 1517.DO f'E[l', A aH111AL AllGl£ (I' 117'17'55", A DISTANC[ aF 1113.24 f'fET (CHORD llEAllS NOS'41°21"W A DISTANCE (I' 1113.11 F'E£'T); 1l£NCE N02'U1'JIJ'W A DISTANCE !F 9J,114 FEET; 1l£HCE Non.1'S!"W A DISTANCE (I' 199.15 FEET; 1llEMCE AUlNC A TANCOIT CIJRYE 10 11£ un HA\Nl A RADIUS (I' ~00 f'fET, A CDITllAl ANGLE rE 05'35'5!" (OIORD BEAllS N12'10'22"W A DISTANCE (I' D5.JI F'E£'T); 1H£11CE Ntrairw A DISTANCE OF ID.17 f'fET; 11EHCE A1.11NG A TANC:ENT CIJRVE TD TltE LEFT HA-A RADIUS llF 30Q.OC FEET, A CEN11IAL AHQ.E !F 20'08'5T, A DISTANCE !F 105.!0 FEET (CllOllO ll£N!S N24'44'53"11 A DISTANCE OF 1114.91 nEl); llENC[ NOT.ll 'OTW A llSTAHCE C1F 197.53 FEET; 11ENCE N41'211'!&"E A DISTANa: rE 71.22 FEET; 1HENCE ~·on: A DISTANCE (I' 1111.2!5 FEET; TllEllCE NOD'54'54"W A DISTANCE (I' 121.114 FEET; 1HENCE N20'21'21'E A DISTANCE (I' 133.31 FEET; 1HENCE N1.l"30'211't A DISTANCE aF a.17 FEET; THENCE No49'27'2'E A DISTANCE CF llU!i FEET TO A PONT ON T1IE NCll1HERLY BOlllDMT C1F 11£ SOU1l1 HAU' OF SAID SECTION 35' THDICE DEPAlllNG SAID NalllfEllLY BOLelDARY SllO'V7'44"'E A DISTANCE CF 147.211 FEET; THENCE Al.ONG THE ARC (I' A CIJRVE lO 1HE LUT HAWIC A llADlJS OF 11111.00 FEET, A CDllRAL ANlll Of l.lO"IU'Df', A OISTANCE (I' 1476.72 FEET, (Cl!OllD 8£NIS 985"12'41"'E A DISTANCE OF 1171.01 FlEr); 1HEllCE N411'42'D7"E A DISTANCE OF 175.57 f'fET; 1HENCE Al.lllC A CIJRVE TO THE LEFT HAI/INC A llADIUS OF 287.79 FEET AND A COllRAL ANCl.E CIF 211'41'44°, A DISTANCE CF 134.12 FEET (OfllAD SEARS ~'04"'E A DISTANCE (I' 132.72 FEET; 1ltENCE HSll"l7'21"E A DISTANCE !F IJD.Dll FEET; 11£11CE N!4"42'2li"W A DISTANCE CF M.5J FEET: 11£HCE Al.llllG THE ARC Of A CU!M 10 11£ RIQIT HAVllG A RADIUS or 1ll0.00 FtET AND A CENTRAL ANCU Of 45'21'05", A DISTANCE CIF 142.!4 FEET (Cl!Olal BEARS Nl1'5!'22"W A DISTANCE or 131.12 FiET); 'IHENCE N39i4'1VW "DISTANCE Of 103.87 rn:r: 1IENCE ALDNC 11£ ARC or A DJRllE 10 11£ RIGHT llA\INO A RADIUS CIF 280.00 rn:T ANO A CEN111AL ANC1..E C1F 13"41'34°, A DISTANCE Of 11.91 FtET (Cl!OllD BE.IRS llJ2'2SJZ"W A DISTANCE Of 1111.76 FiET); THEllCE 1125"J2'45"W A DISTANCE OF 127.21 rn:T; THENCE 116J"l3'5l"E A DISTANCE (I' 128.11 fIET; lHEHCE S71"45°24"E A DISTANCE OF 84.9~ FEET: TH£HC£ N73"43'41"E A DIS1ANCE or 277.a7 FEET; THENCE =:zn A DISTANCE aF 141.11 fIET; nea S14'S8'36"E A DISTANCE Of' 142.111 FEET: THENCE S71"15'14'E A DISTANC£ (I' 29.84 rn:T; THENCE Al.ONG 1HE ARC DF A CURVE TD T1£ un HAWIC A RADlJS or 125.00 FEET AND A aNIRAI. ANGIE or J8"04'5T, A DISTANCE CIF 113.0! FEET (CllOllD BEARS Nll1'42'17"'E A DISTANC[ or 11.511 FEEi): Tl£NCE NIX311'4!"E A DISTANCE OF 37.lll FEET; THENCE N49'0011't A DISTANCE CF ZD.2D FEET TO A POINl ON THE SQIJlHllE!llERLY RIGHT-IF-WAY (I' COUIRAllO STATE llGHWAY 112; THDtCE THE ~ SX (B) CllURSE5 ALONG SAID 5CUTHllESIBl1.Y RIQiT-IF-WAY (I' CDl.IJIADO STATE HIGHWAY 82: 1. 54D'S'49'E A DISTANCE C1F 72.n FEET; Z. S471l5'31'E A DISTAllCE CIF JOUO FEET: :S. SS1iJ'2a'E A DISTANCE CF 111.IJ FEET: 4. S$4"41'48'E A DISTANCE OF 1111.711 FEET; 5. S5rCIZ'59"t A DISTllNCE Of 1111.11 FEET: IS. ssnJ'24'E A DISTANC! OF ID.41 FEET 1ll 1!f'. f!l!T « !!£4j!NNllG, SAID PARC(L or LAND CONTAINING Jl.217 ACRES. UORt: DR ~ HA\£ CAUSED 1HE DESall!ED REAL PROPERlY 111 9E SIJIM:'l[D. I.All OUT AND PLATTED ~ SllOYlll ON 1HIS PLAT UlllER 1HE NAME AND SrnL (I' Wi11W:1K. ~-~~~i:=~ ~=..=~f'li'~~~ ~'t::r~~nc:uOF llAINTENANCE DI' U'IUTIES. IRRIGA 111111 AND DRAIHAIE fACU1D INCUJDlllG, BUT NOT lAlf1ED TD, El£CTRIC L11ES. GAS Ul£S ANl 1lliPHONE llNES, TDC1i11ER l1ll'IH 1HE RlGltT 10 Tlilll INTEliFERNl 1ll£ES AND llRIJSH, ll1H PEIPEllJAL RIGHT OF INGllESS AND EGRESS FtlR INSTAUATllll AND MAt•TENANCE C1F SUCH UNES. SJOi EA!EllEll1' -RlllllS SIAlL BE UTIJZED II A REAS11NA11LE ANll PIUlENT llAllMEL ALL ElCPOISC FtlR !l1REET PAI/INC Ill lll'llDl9IElf1S SHAU. BE RJRNISIEl BY THE SEl1ER DR PURCllASER. HOT BY THE COUNTY OF GARFIEID. EXECU1ED THIS ~ 'riAY Of (M 1 lp4.:'i I A.O., 2015. lllKlt K W:. A COLDllADO UllTED lJABllllY COllPANY /2AVEHU£. UNIT W-B ASPEN, CD 1111111 ~./ ~1~,}~/v.."""~1N&1 Eh': ' ,,, r.s 11,.,.,,..,"""'a la CllUlf1Y ore I""""' 1 ~~ CERtn:.tJ?: a DEDICATION AND OINEllSHP WAS .AO<NOidfDGm llEFllRE 11E 1111S .,1,S Tit DAY (I' A..' • '• • -P'Z $ W A5 ~_... ... .,... (I' EAS1llN« U..C. A CXllllAIXI llllED UMIUTY alllPAN~ ~~~·';ii\'l;e;z~ ~. ' AUOREYEWS 'MlNESS MY HAND AND QfTICIAL SEAL NOTARY PUBLIC ~'I Ngr~?ci~~.216 NO~C UyCommlaionE!i*aJuly23,201Q QlllWI: ~llAal!ECDll IRREVOClllE TRUST DATED IJECOl1IEJI XI, ~ 71D ysT DIMANT AV£HUE. UllT w-11 ASPEN, CD 1111111 /.rl'~f -:~:;;~~-la ~~) 1HE FllREr:QNC ClllllFICAllOI OF DEDICATION AND OVIERSl9' WAS AO<NO'llfDGOl llEFOllE UE 1H1S ~DAY (I' .IL.~u..-r" BY. l)JJWf::' & MA.c..Dq: AS p2MJr!z.I!:. c»: B.JZA8E1H MACGREGOR ttltE\IOCAaE 1RlST DAlED ~- llY COllllJSSIOI EXPID 1 f,i.3 /J.,o I'\ ; r \lllNESS MY HAND AND amaAL SEAL 14..t... 'i at.,, NOTARY l'llBJc AUDREY ELLIS NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF COLORADO NOTARY ID #20034024415 My Comniulon E>pim July 23, 2D1U !llllEI!; ~Gal IUIE'IDC.llU 1RUST DA'Rll DEl:EllllfR XI, DID ~ DU~~E. UNIT 'N-11 ASPEN, CO 1111111 llY\ /I ~ ~.~~ 2Dl5, 2Dl5, 1HE ~ gi:IH:ATICN OF OEDICATICN Niii Cl1llERSlm' WAS AaCN0m llERlRE llE 1llS ~DAY !F ~ 2015, BY!...: M"'4e Ir ASTfZY.>" r rs Fl.ORA MACGIBOR UIREYOCAEl.E lRUST DATED DECEM8£R • llY CCIMS90ll DP11D 7-/' ''AA 1 ' AUDREY ELLIS 'OIESS llY HAND ANl oma111. 3EAL sr~-l'J~ ~~~ (\ •• b,'iOkz ..,~=~'.~19 CERTIFICATE OF MINERAL ESTATE OWNERSHIP 1HE UNDERSIONED SURFACE OWNERS OF THE LANDS SHOllN ON 1NIS PLAT CERTIFY THAT THEY ALSO O'llN 'IHE lllNERAL ESTAlE APP\JlllEIWIT 1HPE1ll ACCOllDllC 10 ns REVIEW OF lHE 1lTl£ llECIRDS AND SUll.£CT TD AHY APPLICABI.£ PAlENT RESERVATION. lllliElt WTBANIC U.C. A ca..DIWlO LlllED UASllTY CClllPANY C/0 DUNllEN! llANAGEllENT, INC. 710 EAST DURANT A\ENJE, llll!T w-e "[';' co 811111 I ~ .-wx .M o~ .u.s1Df1JJ1'01A~'!.. ,.,.,..,.,,..,Ch.INr, , ~~ -=~~ DEtEUl!ER 27, 2000 C/D DUNREIE llANAGEllENT, INC. ~~·--~ Eh':$ '6c.c.x--~;=u ~ ~ IRREVDCAlll.E T1lllST DATED DEElll£ll %7, 2000 ~~~=.r·~l\<-1 ~1111 11'1: ~ .-----...... . ~AOVT;1"~t:, ~ ~3~~ 2s !Ii~ ~~~g ~~ Ol~ ;:;~~~ ~s~d~~ 5~ ~8 ~~~2 ~~~~ i5~ ~u-~ -'~~o ~ z Q Ul ~ Lil ~ 0 g q .. ~ >~Iii ~1 ~ II ~ 11. I ~ 5 2 b. ~ c5 I z -it! E~ Ill -ms :E 111 Ea~ 8 z . >C • G ~i~ ~ z hie rJ Ill '( Bl ID :C U§!~ ::::»iii~! 0 -Cl~ u ~ :c a. t?> :c 0 z~ o9 ~-o ~~~ ~~~:> mo o::u ~9 2111 ~ " PROJECT NO. 21St60S.OO I OF2 :t 0 ~ ::5 :t ~ ll. I AIJJlllNIUll LSl5710 I I I ~C110N35 PREHM RANCH GRAPHIC SCALE --------{ Ill Piil' ) 1 lmlh -eao 1t. lllTw:2: Aa:llDC 1'I CD.CllADa LO 11111&1!11' GIMID'. IMf LBZIL ACnlClll UllD I.al NW.,.,.• .. UMY .,._ ... 'II.Ml -1111-lllllMllSDIDIRCt llllllWllTllAY-M:lllll MllD .._ Mtf aumT IC .. ._.. CIMBICID -1IWf D WliM f1m 1IC DAlE" ...._,._ ..,_. HlllDL \ \ \ ) EASTBANK, LLC MINOR SUBDIVISION A SUBDIVISION OF PARCEL 2A OF EASTBANK, LLC LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN THE S 1 /2 SECTION 35, L a: Y JAllllAROll fAlllLY LLLP 4'115 HWY. 82 Gl.ENWDOD SPRINGS, co 81801 TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 89 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M. COUNTY OF GARFIELD, STATE OF COLORADO ( \ \ I \ I \ I \ WAREHCUSE INVESTMENT \ I 111f~:i~E ', _..__\_C1£'1ENNE._ WY 82001-\ \ . : " Cl~ ~~~ ~i ~ LOT3 1S.944:tAc. PARCELt EASTBANK LOT SPLIT RECEPTION N0.770438 6 •123'33°29° R •1150.00' L •1401.72' T •1211.18' CB•Sll1 '54'29"E ~ IRONBRIDGE GOLF COURSE WESTBANK FILING I D£I'AILB SCAI.£: 1° = 30' __ , \ 30• AIXESS '\\\\/- \ LOT 3 \ \ -e--.. _ .. _ .. LOT 2 PARCEL EASlBANK PARC£l.'1B - REC. NO. 813~~T SPLIT \~ s RQARlllG FORK RIVEll /---__ !_.-------~-,,, ~---~ ----- ,,,----- ../ D£I'AILA SCALE: 1' m 30' LINE L1 L2 L3 l4 LS LD L7 L8 l.9 L10 l11 L12 · L13 L14 L15 L16 L17 L18 L19 l20 L.21 L22 L23 L.24 L.25 l26 L27 L28 L29 L30 l.31 l.32 L33 l.34 l.35 L36 L37 l.38 l.39 l40 CURVE TABLE CURVE I RADIUS DEL TA I LENGlH I TANGENT I QiORD BEARING I OiORD C1 I 745.00' 14"25'00° r1a7.4B' I 94.24' 1 se4"2s'o7"w 11ss.aR' C2 I 1!'1t7nri' i7's5" I 193.24' I ee.75' I Nos·45•21·w I 1e3.11· C3 I 838.00' .45' r 47.a2' r N1210·22-w-1 es ...... C4 I 300.00' .o<nR'~~ ~en• I &-. -r.n-I h1?,4•44'53'"W I 1n .. rw:.• C5 I 45.""' 1617'~-· n'7' I ?a 39' I N70'2B'54"1" I 49.21' C6 I 200;00• 1-.A' ... -; llA' I CA tn' I c::RA..,01'1.a"w I 1nA. .L"' C7 I soo.oo· 111·0.~· :1.84' I 112.20' I N83"56'57"E 1220.58' ca 1 .,..,,nn• '5'08'41° a 57' I 55.811' I S81'59'07"W 1108."a' C9 I 250.oo· :-i-·#'06" 07:93' I 54.82' I N81.47'50"E J 107.0ll' C10 I 100.00• 1.::*":lA.•AA• 324.73' I 165.34' I S80'52'30"W H21.R'I' C11 I '71'V'\11ft1 . ..,,.,~ 'IUI:' I II c-..• I C1Ra-m:.,.•13•w ( 11.nA' C12 I 257.79' •e·41•44• l 134.12' I 88.50' I 560"21'"4~ In .. C13 I 1ao~cxi' A.o;'?R'nA" f 142.84' I 75,42' I N81'58'22"W I 1J9,1n' C14 I 2so.oo• 13"41'34" IM:i2': I JJ,8'7'ljljj2_"2J'J2°W I 88 7a• C15 I 125.oo' ......,4•57• I 83.08' I 43.14'. I N81.42'17"E I 81:5&' C16 I 1 se.00• 'n"'"'H0 I 07.82'-r5o.21'1 S8411'54"W I 98.27' ffi ~8 !O ~ ~~~~ ~8~~ ~~ 0) 8 --'ilio8 fii. ~ ~~~~ ~~~~~ ;i "' --'m :!: u ~ ~ :> ~ ~ iii ~ ~ 0 ci z ti ~ z .. ~ 11. t5 I ii!;~ Ill .. ma :E ~ ~B~ ~ B ~i~ ~ Z ~12 u; 111 Ill <11;1 ~ ~ ~Q 1· '""m~8a z .... ~ :::>; !! 0 .. 15!j! u ~ :c ii. " i 0 ~ z~ ~~ ~aa :i~ ~~~ ~z Zmz n ~~a w ~z9 Ii: illl ~ ii: ~ ~ " PROJECT NO. .ZtSIOOS.00 20F2 STANDARD BACTERIOLOGICAL WATER TEST SNOWMASS WATER & SANITATION DISTRICT P.O. BOX 5700 -SNOWMASS VILLAGE, CO 81615 PWS ID# sample Locallon E: ~f h:tn "- SAMPLE TAKEN : DATE lfl'J.1 f16 TtME ~NAMEOFSUPPLY &el l -/r:if 2... COUNTY fig,(' SAMPLER C • ~ CHLORINE RESIDUAL __ MGIL ( ) COMMUNITY SUPPLY ( ) ROUTINE DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM SUPPLY ( ) NON COMMUNITY ( ) CHECK SAMPLE ( ) PROCESS WATER ( ) OTHER PUBLIC ( ) RAW (')Q GROUND { ) SURFACE Q(I PRIVATE ( ) SPECIAL PURPOSE SAMPLE .. NOTE· IF ALL . NFORMATION IS NOT SUPPLIED. THE SAMPLE WILL BE DISCARDED. see REVERSE FOR TI ME LIMITATIONS. SAMPL\f.IG INSTRUCTIONS ANO DEFINffiO.!:lrS. coevj@ w Y'tAltf wa,r~r. ~~:~KS : 'f1t> -q45 11-~ U C.(J7YI • ~~:l~ fllll!ft/pt!jfe i ::: ~ '"""'""'" ffE """"'""a <_ FOR TEST ANALYST/FINISH ~ COLIFORM E.COLI RESULTS ~-· PRESENT PRESENT COLIFORM E.COLI MPN~--~----~~----~ MPN-~-~-~--~-- DATE DATE DO NOT WRITE IN THIS SPACE 9 h-4(/fj TIME I '1:?? CJ '1 11 Cf,_/=-TIME 15 0 d RESULTS GREATER THAN ONE COLIFORM PER 'DO ML INDICATES NON-COMPLIANCE WITH MINIMUM DRINKING WATER STANDARDS RECEIVED ON TEST BOTTLE#: ___ ._/_~_?.......,_/ ________ _ Nicole Garrimone-Campagna, Esq. March 10, 2015 Garfield & Hecht, P.C. 420 Seventh Street, Suite 1000 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 RE: Eastbank, LLC – Lot 2 Existing Well Pumping Test Results Dear Nicole: This letter report presents the technical analysis of the water supply from the existing well located on the proposed Lot 2 of the Eastbank, LLC Minor Subdivision located within Parcel 2A of Eastbank Parcel 2 Lot Split in Garfield County, Colorado, as shown on Figure 1. A pumping test for the well was conducted by Resource Engineering, Inc. (RESOURCE) and Ray’s Well Done Pump Service, LLC (Ray’s) on March 3, 2015. A water sample from the well was also obtained during the pumping test. The results are presented below. SUMMARY The existing well on the proposed Lot 2 has a valid well permit (Permit No. 50236) issued by the Division of Water Resources. The well permit allows for a 4,000 square foot office/repair shop building, occasional truck washing, floor washing, and not more than 1,000 square feet of landscape irrigation. The maximum pumping rate allowed for the well is 15 gallons per minute (gpm), with the annual amount of groundwater to be withdrawn not to exceed 0.4 acre-feet. The well has an estimated long-term yield of over 20 gpm based on a 4-hour pumping test and recovery data. The well water quality data will be available from the laboratory in a few weeks and a separate letter with the results and analysis will be prepared. The well has historically served the potable demands for a small office on the property, landscape irrigation, truck washing, and facility washing. WATER WELL Well Construction The well was constructed in 1967 by an unknown driller. The well is located in a concrete vault structure and is drilled approximately 70 feet deep. The well supplies water to two pressurized storage tanks and then to the office and maintenance shops. The well construction and test report is not available, so no other information on the well is known. The well appears to be drilled in an unconfined alluvial aquifer that is extensive and hydraulically connected to the Roaring Fork River. The current water level elevation in the well is at approximately the same elevation as the Roaring Fork River. The water level in the aquifer fluctuates seasonally, depending on deep percolation from precipitation and irrigation. The water levels are at the lowest levels during the winter time and will rise as snow melt occurs and flood irrigation begins. The pumping test was conducted when the water levels are seasonally at their lowest levels. Therefore, it is anticipated that the water levels will not significantly drop from their current levels, due to the influence of the Roaring Fork River on the aquifer. Nicole Garrimone-Campagna, Esq. March 10, 2015 Page 2 Pumping Test A pumping test was conducted on March 3, 2015, for the well. The purpose of the test was to determine the long-term yield of the well and its adequacy to serve the existing uses (or future uses) for a Garfield County (GARCO) Land Use Application to create a minor subdivision. The initial static water level was measured at 33.35 feet below the top of casing (TOC) as shown on Figure 2. The pumping rate was initially set at approximately 20 gpm to stress the well and the flow rate continued for the entire duration of the test. The well had a total drawdown of 0.28 feet as shown on Figure 3. The final water level at the end of the pumping part of the test was 33.63 feet. The test was terminated after 4 hours of pumping (the minimum pumpin g test length required in the GARCO regulations) due to the limited drawdown and connection to the Roaring Fork River alluvium described below. Over the 4-hour pumping period approximately 4,800 gallons was pumped, resulting in an average pumping rate of 20 gpm. Analysis Figures 2 and 3 shows the water level in the well dropping minimally during the 4-hour pump test. The water level slowly dropped 0.28 ft. in the first 2 hours and remained relatively steady for the remainder of the test. Based on a total drawdown of only 0.28 feet, and the hydraulic connection to the Roaring Fork River, RESOURCE determined that the pumping test could be terminated after 4 hours. Figure 4 depicts the water level recovery in the well in the 5 minutes after pumping ceased. T represents the total time since the pumping test started and T’ represents the time since pumping stopped. The well reaches complete recovery at T/T’ equals more than 2 (8 hr/4 hr), which means the well recovered faster than the rate at which the well was pumped. This indicates that, at the time of the test, the well completely recharged at a rate equal to or more than the 20 gpm average pumping rate. The well is capable of producing more water than the permitted pumping capacity of 15 gpm. Well Location The permitted location for the well is the NW ¼ of the SE ¼, of Section 35, Township 6 South, Range 89 West of the 6th P.M. at a point approximately 1700 feet from the south section line and 1950 feet from the east section line. The actual location of the well was located from a site visit using aerial photography. The actual location is approximately 180 feet from the permitted location as shown on Figure 1. The Division of Water Resources requires wells to be constructed within 200 feet of their permitted location. WATER QUALITY RESOURCE collected one water quality sample from the well water during the pumping test. The sample was shipped by overnight delivery under proper chain of custody to National Testing Laboratories. The results will be available in a couple of weeks. RESOURCE will prepare a letter summarizing the results when the data is available. Nicole Garrimone-Campagna, Esq. March 10, 2015 Page 3 CONCLUSION The results from the pumping test and water sampling indicate that the well has an adequate yield to serve the existing uses on the proposed Lot 2. The yield is estimated to be at least 20 gpm, which exceeds the permitted pumping rate of the well. RESOURCE will provide the results and analysis of the laboratory data when it is available. Please call if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, RESOURCE ENGINEERING, INC. Michael J. Erion, P.E. Water Resources Engineer MJE/mje 1325-17.1 Attachments !(Lot 2 Eastbank, LLC Lot 2 Well(Permit No. 50236) S82 Eastbank, LLC Minor Subdivision Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS,USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GISUser Community Figure 1: Well Location MapEastbank, LLC ®0 800 1,600400 Feet Date: 03/10/2015File: 1325-17.1Drawn: RKMApproved: MJE Background: 2011 Aerial Photograph 1 in = 800 ft RESOURCE 909 Colorado Avenue / Glenwood Springs, CO 81601Voice: (970) 945-6777 - Web: www.resource-eng.com E N G I N E E R I N G, I N C. T6S R89W Figure 2 1325-17.1 03/05/2015 Prepared by RKM Approved by MJE 0 10 20 30 40 50 6030 32 34 36 38 40 1 10 100 1000 Fl o w R a t e ( g p m ) De p t h f r o m T O C ( f e e t ) Pumping Time (minutes) Eastbank, LLC Lot 2 Well Pumping Test Depth from TOC (feet) Static Water Level Depth of Water from TOC Flow Rate Static Water Level = 33.35 ft. Notes: 1) Initial Water Level: 33.35 ft. below Top of Well Casing 2) Final Water Level: 33.63 ft. below Top of Well Casing 3) Well Depth: 70 ft. from Top of Well Casing Pumping Rate = 20.0 gpm Figure 3 1325-17.1 03/05/2015 Prepared by RKM Approved by MJE 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 300.0 2.0 4.0 1 10 100 1000 Fl o w R a t e ( g p m ) Dr a w d o w n ( f e e t ) Pumping Time (minutes) Eastbank, LLC Lot 2 Well Pumping Test Drawdown (feet) Drawdown Flow Rate Drawdown after 4 hrs of pumping = 0.28 ft. Average Pumping Rate: 20.0 gpm Figure 4 1325-17.1 03/05/2015 Prepared by RKM Approved by MJE 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 1 10 100 Re s i d u a l D r a w d o w n ( f e e t ) T/T' (minutes) Eastbank, LLC Lot 2 Well Pumping Test Recovery Recovery Notes: 1) Well recharges at a rate equal to or greater than the average pumping rate when the well reaches fully recovery at T/T' equal to 2 (8hr/4hr) Well completely recovered in less than 2 minutes TRAFFIC REPORT FOR LOT 2 EASBANK MINOR SUBDIVISION EASTBANK EQUINE HOSPITAL AND PROFESSIONAL DIESEL AND AUTOMOTIVE GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO PREPARED FOR: Eastbank, LLC 710 East Durant Avenue, W-6 Aspen, CO 81611 PREPARED BY: High Country Engineering, Inc. 1517 Blake Avenue, Suite 101 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 (970) 945-8676 May 10th, 2016 HCE JOB NUMBER: 2151007.00 Page 2 j:/sdskproj/215/1007/word/Traffic Impact Report TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE I. S I T E L O C A T I O N 3 II. DESCRIPTION OF SITE 3 III. EXISTING ACCESS 3 IV. EXISTING TRAFFIC GENERATION 4 V. PROPOSED TRAFFIC GENERATION 4 VI. PARKING REQUIREMENTS 5 V I I . C O N C L U S I O N S 6 VIII. REFERENCES 7 EXHIBITS: 1. Vicinity Map (8.5” x 11”) 2. Parking Plan Page 3 j:/sdskproj/215/1007/word/Traffic Impact Report I. Site Location The site (a portion of Lot 2 Eastbank Minor Subdivision) is located in Section 35 of Township 6 South, Range 89 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, Garfield County Colorado. The project is bounded to the on the south by private property and the Roaring Fork River, on the northeast be County Road 154, and to the northwest by a FedEx Ground facility (Lot 1 Eastbank) and the new access to road to County Road 154. State Highway 82 is located adjacent to County Road 154 to the northeast. County Road 154 intersects with State Highway 82 approximately 800-ft north of the property. II. Description of Property The 16.983-acre Lot 2 Eastbank Minor Subdivision parcel is a property with several existing buildings including a 3,900 square-foot building currently leased to waste management service company. This existing structure includes a second floor in a portion of the structure. The primitive/driveway on the southeast corner of Lot 2 will remain in place and serve the small existing building that is used by the owner of Lot 2 as an office as well as a portion of land leased by Gould Construction for storing equipment and materials. The southeast access is not affected by the proposed project and the trips generated from this side of Lot 2 onto County Road 154 will remain unchanged by the proposed improvements. This traffic study will cover the application for the proposed 4,400 SF building to be Eastbank Equine Hospital as well as the renovation and expansion of the existing building currently leased to Intermountain Waste and Recycling. This existing building will be expanded to approximately 5,050 square feet and will be headquarters for Professional Diesel and Automotive following the renovation. The upper Lot 2 area will be a large open gravel area with low to moderate slopes that will provide flexibility for the circulation of vehicles and abundant room for short term and long term parking. III. Existing Access These two businesses will be accessed via the improved access off County Road 154 recently constructed as part of the FedEx Ground Facility to the northwest occupying Lot 1 of the Eastbank Minor Subdivision. The access is 30’ wide and has been designed to accommodate WB-67D trucks (double bottom combination trucks) with a total length of 73.3 feet used by the FedEx operation. This access is sized properly to accommodate horse trailers that will utilize the access for the equine hospital. The Lot 2 access onto the shared driveway with Lot 1 (FedEx Ground) is over 100 feet from the intersection of County Road 154. This provides room for the proposed Lot 2 traffic to straighten out prior to reaching the intersection of County Road 154 and also provides room for stacking of at least one of the large FedEx WB- 67D trucks so that the Lot 2 access is not blocked. Page 4 j:/sdskproj/215/1007/word/Traffic Impact Report A secondary access will remain in place to the east of the proposed buildings. This access will be eliminated once the access to a new public school site is constructed, at which point a secondary access point to the two proposed businesses will be provided from this future road. This road will eventually serve up to two public schools and future residential development. For the purposes of this traffic study, we will assume that this secondary access will not handle any of the proposed trips generated by the two businesses. 100% of the trips generated will access from the shared driveway with FedEx Ground on Lot 1. IV. Existing Traffic Generation The existing 4000 square foot waste management facility is used for overnight storage of covered waste containers till they can be transferred to a local landfill the following day. The recycled materials are sorted to be taken to a processing facility offsite. The site is closed to the public so the traffic is limited to employees, limited customer/vendor traffic, and truck traffic to and from the site. The applicant was provided typical traffic according to the staff in charge of daily operations for Intermountain Waste and Recycling. The site receives an average weekday total of 140 truck trips per weekday, 30 employee vehicle trips, and 20 customer/vendor trips. A majority of these trips will also be heavy trucks which have a greater impact to the surrounding road network than the more typical composite of vehicles proposed for the two proposed businesses Using a passenger car equivalency of 2 for each garbage truck, the total existing trips for this portion of Lot 2 is equal to 330 trips. V. Proposed Traffic Generation Eastbank Equine Hospital The proposed 4,400 square foot equine hospital facility will be in operation from 8AM-5PM Monday through Friday. The operators expect to see a maximum of 12 customer visits in an average week (up to seven visits during a busy day). The business will require up to 6 full time employees once the business is at the full buildout. There will also be approximately 1 delivery to the site each weekday. This type of facility does not fit the typical parameters for a medical facility for trips per 1000 square foot of gross floor area or number of employees so the ITE Trip Generation manual was not referenced. We estimate that only half the employees would travel into Glenwood or Carbondale to run errands or have lunch and that each employee has their own vehicle. This equates to 18 trips per weekday from employees. The daily delivery will add an additional 2 trips per day. The customers will generate 14 trips. This brings the total average daily traffic (ADT) trips during a busy weekday to 34 trips. Professional Diesel and Automotive Page 5 j:/sdskproj/215/1007/word/Traffic Impact Report The proposed 4720 square foot auto repair shop will be in operation from 8AM-5PM Monday through Friday. The operator of the proposed business expects to see a maximum of 20 customer visits in an average week (10 customer visits during a particularly busy business day). There will be up to 5 employees and we estimate that all would have their own vehicles and 3 would make a trip offsite during the day. This brings the ADT during a busy weekday to 42 trips based on the operator’s historic data. The calculation based on the ITE Trip Generation manual for an automobile care center business with approximately 5,050 square feet is 20 trips during the peak hour. The AASHTO “A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets” suggests, in section 2-49, that on a typical rural arterial that peak hour traffic is about 25% of the Average Daily Traffic (ADT). This calculates out to an ADT of 80 trips over an entire weekday. In order to be conservative in the proposed traffic generation and its effects on the local street network, we will assume that 80 trips will be required on an average weekday. Total Proposed Trip Generation The total estimate average daily traffic for the two proposed business is 122 trips during a busy day for both businesses. This is approximately a 63% reduction in average daily traffic for the two proposed businesses compared to the existing commercial operations. VI. Off-Street Parking Eastbank Equine Hospital The Garfield County Land Use and Development Code has standards for parking requirements for “retail, service, or office” commercial uses of 1 parking space per 250 SF of leasable floor area. This will be used for the typical office portions of the building. There is not a good reference for animal medical facilities in the County Code. However, the City of Glenwood Springs Municipal Code has a category for “general service establishment not otherwise listed” which provides requirement of 1 parking space per 450 square feet of floor area. The office and reception portions of the proposed equine hospital account for approximately 1,560 square feet of the building. 1,560 SF /250 = 6.24 spaces The surgery area portion of the building accounts for 800 square feet. 800 SF/450 = 1.78 spaces The rest of the building is just in-doors holding areas for animals which would not generate any parking requirements. This makes for a need for a minimum of 8 parking spaces of which 1 will need to be a handicap accessible space. Page 6 j:/sdskproj/215/1007/word/Traffic Impact Report Exhibit 2 reflects these spaces as well as an area for horse trailers. Professional Diesel and Automotive The Garfield County Land Use and Development Code does not have a good match for the proposed use of automotive repair. For the portion of the building with office space, the estimate of 1 parking space per 250 SF of leasable floor space will be used. The City of Glenwood Springs Municipal Code has a category for “vehicle service station” which provides requirement of 3 parking space per service bay (excluding the bay itself). This will be used for the rest of the building which includes 4 service bays. The office and reception portions of the proposed auto repair facility accounts for approximately 1,850 square feet of the building. 1,850 SF /250 = 7.40 spaces The 4 bay service area accounts for the balance of the building. 4 Bays x 3 = 12.00 spaces This makes for a need for a minimum of 18 parking spaces of which 1 will need to be a handicap accessible space. VII. Conclusions The proposed uses on Lot 2 Eastbank Minor Subdivision will produce a reduction in the overall traffic generation onto the surrounding road network. The access driveway constructed as part of the Lot 1 development is sized to handle large semitrailer trucks and the proposed Lot 2 access point off this shared driveway is far from the County Road to provide for stacking and allow large vehicles length to straighten out within the shared access road before reaching the intersection of the County Road 154. The upper portion of Lot 2 provides more than enough space for parking for the proposed uses. This traffic analysis will need to be reviewed if the site operations are expanded in the future or if additional commercial uses are added to Lot 2. VIII. References Rich Engineering Company, “Federal Express Ground Distribution Facility Traffic Impact Page 7 j:/sdskproj/215/1007/word/Traffic Impact Report Analysis Garfield County”, March 6th, 2015 AASHTO “A policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, 2011, 6th addition” Greenbook Institute of Transpiration Engineers, Trip Generation Manual, 6th Edition Garfield County “Land Use and Development Code, Amended December 17, 2015” City of Glenwood Springs “Municipal Code, September 17, 2015” • HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC. 1•17-.m:AVINUC,sm 101, llU!NWOCID8PIUIDll,C0818DI PHONE ~9111179 •AX (8'10)9··- WWW.HCllNQ,COM EASTBANIC, UC DRAWNllY: GARFIELD COUNTY, CO '"""===DR~D--~==iv_•_IOOCI _ ____. CHllCICllD B'I: l'RO.IEICrNO: SCALI!: EA1111ANJCIQlllNIH01Pn'~,___RDN _____ 2_i5_1007 _ ____. DATIC PAall: IHC>UI LOT 1 \ (F EX GROU ND FAC ILITY) \ ) PR IMARY ACC ESS FOR LOT 2 LOT2 GR AP H IC SCA LE / / ,./' / / / / 50 0 25 50 1 00 200 c:~•·::i•••=--1-1--1----•I ( IN F EET ) 1 inch = 5 0 ft. LE GE ND I I ~ -I···:•; .. 4 H·l S ~C;,O~DARY ACC ES S TO BE :(R EMQ~ED WITH FUTU RE SC HOO L ACCE SS CONS TRUCTION EXISTI NG AS PH ALT PAVING PROPOS ED BU ILDIN G EXISTI NG BU IL DING PROPOS ED GR A VE L CONCR ETE z 0 ii! ~ 2Ul1007 2 LOT 1 .... .' ("" I I I ~ ~ ·! ·.' ·! ·.' ·! ·.' ·! ·.'; ... , , "·'·"·'·"·'· ·;·;·;·, ·, ·, ·, ·, ·, . LEGEND EXISTING ASPHALT PA~NG PROPOSED BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING PROPOSED GRA va EXISTING CONCRETE ---5950---EXISTING 5' MAJOR CONTOUR EXISTING 1' MINOR CONTOUR PROPOSED 1' CONTOUR BY LOT 1 PROPOSED 5' MAJOR CONTOUR PROPOSED 1' MINOR CONTOUR PROPOSED SEDIMENT CONTROL FENCE ---5949--- ------------ PROPOSED STORM SEWER PIPE PROPOSED DRYWELL PROPOSED VEHICLE TRACKING CONTROL SPOT ELEVATION, 00.00 = 5900.00' GRAPHIC SCALE ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 30 ft. z 0 Ui ~ 0:: ci z 0 z 0:: ;: 0 ··omo:: ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 u PROJECT NO. 2151007.00 GR HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL May 5, 2016 Eastbank, LLC Attn: Robert MacGregor 710 East Durant A venue Aspen, Colorado 81611 rmac@dunrene.com Hcpworch-Pawbk Geotcchnic.1!, Inc. 5020 County Road I 54 GlmwooJ Springs, Colorado 81601 Phone: 970-945-7988 fox : 970-945-8454 cm,ul: hpgco@hpgcotcch com Job No.116 128A Subject: Subsoil Study for Foundation Design, Proposed Equine Surgery Center, 3929 County Road 154, Garfield County, Colorado Dear Mr. MacGregor: As requested, Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. performed a subsoil study for design of foundations at the subject site. The study was conducted in accordance with our agreement for geotechnical engineering services to Eastbank, LLC dated April 20, 2016. The data obtained and our recommendations based on the proposed construction and subsurface conditions encountered are presented in this report. Proposed Construction: The proposed building will be a single story steel frame/metal skin structure with a slab-on-grade floor. The building footprint will be about 5,000 square feet and will be located on the site as shown on Figure l. Cut depths are expected to range between about 3 to 4 feet. Foundation loadings for this type of construction are assumed to be relatively light for walls and moderate for column pads, typical of the proposed type of construction. If building conditions or foundation loadings are significantly different from those described above, we should be notified to re-evaluate the recommendations presented in this report. Site Conditions: The site is currently a gravel surfaced storage yard for a trash hauling business. The ground surface slopes gently down to the south-southeast in the building area. Directly southwest of the proposed building the ground surface drops off steeply down toward the Roaring Fork River located well below the building site. The hillside is vegetated with sage brush and weeds. Fill has been previously placed in the building area. Subsurface Conditions: The subsurface conditions at the site were evaluated by excavating five exploratory pits at the approximate locations shown on Figure 1. The logs of the pits are presented on Figure 2. The subsoils encountered, below about 1 Yi to 3 feet of fill, consist of about 2Y2 feet of stiff sandy silty clay in Pits 1 and 2 overlying Parker 303-841-7119 • Colorado Springs 719-633-5562 • Silverthorne 970-468-1989 -2 - relatively dense, slightly silty to silty sandy gravel with cobbles and small boulders. The clay was not encountered in Pits 3 to 5. The fill consisted of mainly road base at Pits l and 2 and miscellaneous soils with organics at Pits 3 to 5. Results of swell-consolidation testing performed on a relatively undisturbed sample of the sandy silty clay, presented on Figure 3, indicate low compressibility under existing moisture conditions and light loading and a minor collapse potential (settlement under constant load) when wetted. The clay sample showed moderate to high compressibility under increased loading after wetting. Results of gradation analyses performed on samples of the underlying gravel soils (minus 3 to 5 inch fraction) obtained from the site are presented on Figure 4. No free water was observed in the pits at the time of excavation and the soils were slightly moist to moist. Foundation Recommendations: Considering the subsoil conditions encountered in the exploratory pits and the nature of the proposed construction, we recommend spread footings placed on the undisturbed natural gravel soils or a limited depth of structural fill designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of 3,000 psf for support of the proposed building. The clay soils tend to compress after wetting which could result in some post- construction foundation settlement and we recommend that the clay be removed from below all footing areas. Footings should be a minimum width of 16 inches for continuous walls and 2 feet for columns. Loose disturbed soils, existing fill and clay soils encountered at the foundation bearing level within the excavation should be removed and the footing bearing level extended down to the undisturbed natural soils. As an alternative, design footing grade could be re-established with structural fill consisting of imported COOT Class 6 Road base compacted to at least 100% of the maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. The structural fill placed below footings should be limited to 18 inches in depth. Exterior footings should be provided with adequate cover above their bearing elevations for frost protection. Placement of footings at least 36 inches below the exterior grade is typically used in this area. Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span local anomalies such as by assuming an unsupported length of at least IO feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining structures (if any) should be designed to resist a lateral earth pressure based on an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 50 pcf for the on-site soil as backfill, excluding organics and rocks larger than about 6 inches. Floor Slabs: The natural on-site soils, exclusive of fill, are suitable to support lightly slab-on-grade construction. It may be possible to leave the existing road base fill encountered in Pits l and 2 in place under the slab-on-grade areas. This can be further evaluated at the time of footing excavation. To reduce the effects of some differential movement, floor slabs should be separated from all bearing walls and columns with expansion joints which allow unrestrained vertical movement. Floor slab control joints should be used to reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking. The requirements for joint spacing and slab reinforcement should be established by the designer based on experience and the intended slab use. A minimum 4 inch layer of free-draining gravel should be Job No.116 128A -3 - placed beneath slabs. This material should consist of minus 2 inch aggregate with less than 50% passing the No. 4 sieve and less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve. AH fill materials for support of floor slabs should be compacted to at least 95% of maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Required fill can consist of imported COOT Class 6 road base or other well graded granular soils devoid of vegetation, topsoil and oversized rock. Underdrain System: An underdrain system should not be needed for the proposed slab- on-grade building. Surface Drainage: The following drainage precautions should be observed during construction and maintained at all times after the building has been completed: 1) Inundation of the foundation excavations and underslab areas should be avoided during construction. 2) Exterior bac kfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density in pavement and slab areas and to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density in landscape areas. Exterior wall backfill should be compacted to reduce surface water infiltration. 3) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions. We recommend a minimum slope of 12 inches in the first 10 feet in unpaved areas and a minimum slope of 2V2 inches in the first 10 feet in pavement and walkway areas. 4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill. Limitations: This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no warranty either express or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the exploratory pits excavated at the locations indicated on Figure l and to the depths shown on Figure 2, the proposed type of construction, and our experience in the area. Our services do not include determining the presence, prevention or possibility of mold or other biological contaminants (MOBC) developing in the future. If the client is concerned about MOBC, then a professional in this special field of practice should be consulted. Our findings include interpolation and extrapolation of the subsurface conditions identified at the exploratory pits and variations in the subsurface conditions may not become evident until excavation is performed. If conditions encountered during construction appear different from those described in this report, we should be notified al once so re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made. Job No .116 128A This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes. We are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. As the project evolves, we should provide continued consultation and field services during construction to review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations, and to verify that the recommendations have been appropriately interpreted. Significant design changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommendations presented herein. We recommend on-site observation of excavations and foundation bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a representative of the geotechnical engineer. If you have any questions or if we may be of further assistance, please let us know . Respectfully Submitted, Rev. by: SLP DEH/ksw attachments Figure 1 -Location of Exploratory Pits Figure 2 -Logs of Exploratory Pits Figure 3 -Swell-Consolidation Test Results Figure 4 -Gradation Test Results Table I -Summary of Laboratory Test Results cc: High Country Engineering -Attn: Roger Neal rneal@hceng.com FUSE Architecture+ Construction -Attn: Bruce Upton bu pton@fuseacs.com Job No . 116 128A 116 128A PITS EXISTING DRIVE PIT1 • PROPOSED • PIT 4 BUILD JNG APPROXIMATE SCALE 1".,.... 60' ~ HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL. PROPOSED DRIVE LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY PITS Figure 1 Qj QI u. .s:: .... C1 QI 0 0 5 10 LEGEND . PIT 1 ELEV .= 5948' WC =19 .4 DD c 92 PIT2 ELEV.= 5946' I +4.,,71 -.J -200 =12 PIT 3 PIT 4 PITS ELEV -5948 ELEV.::: 5948' ELEV. -5849' 0 . 5 I +4•63 -.J -200 =6 10 FILL; mostly roadbase in Pits 1 and 2 . Combination or clayey sand with organics , reddish brown clayey sandy gravel , and miscellaneous soils , lo ose, sligh tly moist to moi st. multi-colored . CLAY (Cl); silty, sandy, stiff , sl ightly moist to moist, red . GRAVEL (GM-GP); sandy , silly, with cobbles and sma ll bou tders, medium dense to dense , and redd fsh brown in upper 1 to 2 feet. Deep er grav el soils are slightly snty and light brown ~ 2 ' Diameter hand driven liner sample . ~ -: Disturbed bulk sample . ~ -.J NOTES 1. Exploratory pits were excavated on April 20 , 2016 with a backhoe . 2 . Locations of exploratory pits were measured approximately by pacing from features shown on the site plan provided . 3 . Elevations of exploratory pits were obtained by interpolation between contours shown on the site plan provided and checked by instrument level. 4 . The exploratory pit locations and elevations should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used 5 . The lines between materials shown on the exploratory pit logs represent the approximate boundar ies between material types and transitions may be gradua l. 6 . No rree water was encountered in the pits at the time of excavating . Fluctuation in water level may occur with time . 7. Laboratory Testing Results : WC = Water Content (%) DD = Dry Density (pc0 + 4 """ Percent retained on the No . 4 sieve -200 = Percent passing the No 200 sieve Qj if .c. a Q) Cl 116 128A ~ LOGS OF EXPLORATORY PITS Figure 2 HEPWORTH•PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL. Moisture Content = 19.4 percent Dry Density .,. 92 pcf Sample of: Sandy Silty Clay From: Pit 1 at 2 Feet 0 -..._ -·n 1 " '\ <:: l-...... Compression -~upon (fl. 2 wetting c:: \ § .Ci) Ul 3 (1) ... I\ a. E 0 () 4 ' 5 \ \ 6 \ 7 \ llJ 8 0 .1 1.0 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE -ksf 116 128A ~ Hecworth-Powlak Geoledmlcal SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Figure 3 0 w z ~ a: I-z w (.) a: LU Cl. HYDROMETER ANALYSIS SIEVE ANALYSIS I TIME READINGS t U .S STANDARD SERIES I CLEAR SQUARE OPENINGS I 2•:fA 7kR 45 IN. 15 MIN. 60MIN19MIN.4 MIN. 1 MIN #200 #100 #50 130 116 10 #4 3/8' 3/4' 1 1/2" 3' 5'6' 0· 0 10 20 30 . 40 50 - 60 70 80 90 100 .DOI .002 005 009 01!1 .037 .01• 150 .300 .&10 I ti 2315 U~ 95 lZS 190 175 7112 152 20:I 127 DIAMETER OF PARTICLES IN MILLIMETERS C~YIOSU :1---=F•""1E:----.,..---SAl'""'Mt""~""v~.,..., -.,.,. COARSE==--:---..F.--•E:--=CRA-...VE=L....._,,co""'ARS=""E ---t: COBBlES GRAVEL 71 % SAND 17 % SAMPLE OF: Silty Sandy Gravel with Cobbles SILT AND CLAY 12 % FROM: Pit 2 at 4 to 5 Feet HYDROMETER ANALYSIS SIEVE ANALYSIS 7 HA TIME READINGS I US. STANDARD SERIES I CLEAR SQUARE OPENINGS I t:x'I 80 (!) 70 z Ci5 en <t 00 Cl. I- 1() z w (.) •O a: w Cl. 38 2t: 10 0 24 -IR . 3/8' 314• 1 1/2' 3' 5'6' 8' 65 JllN 15 MIN . 60MIN19MIN 4 M.N . 1 MIN. #200 #100 #50 #30 #16 #8 #4 100 10 0 20 w z 30 ~ a: 40 ~ 50 w ~ 60 w Cl. 70 80 90 100 : 90 BO (.!J 70 z Ci5 en 60 ~ 1- 50 z LU 0 40 a: w Cl. 30 20 10 0 001 .002 005 .009 019 .03 7 .074 .150 300 .600 1 18 2 36 4 75 9 512 519 0 37.5 76.2 12~52 203 DIAMETER OF PARTICLES IN Mill METERS Cl.>1 10$1. r I MH ll\JM 1 ou>e~ I GRAVEL 63 % SAND 31 % SILT AND CLAY 6 % SAMPLE OF: Slightly Silty Sandy Gravel FROM : Pit 4 at 5 to 6 Feet 116 128A ~ GRADATION TEST RESULTS Figure 4 HEPWORTH-PA~K GEOTEC:HNIC:Al. HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. TABLE 1 Job No. 116128A SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS SAMPLE LOCATION NATURAL NATURAL GRADATION A TTERBERG LIMITS UNCONFINED PERCENT MOISTURE DRY GRAVEL SAND PASSING LIQUID PLASTIC COMPRESSIVE SOIL OR PIT DEPTH CONTENT DENSITY NO. 200 LIMIT INDEX STRENGTH BEDROCK TYPE (%) (%) SIEVE (fl) (%\ (DCfl (%) (%) (PSF) l 2 19.4 92 Sandy Silty Clay 2 4 to 5 71 17 12 Silty Sandy Gravel with Cobbles 4 5 to 6 63 31 6 Slightly Silty Sandy Gravel .. inrmt, __..-::: ------ - - - - - -::.------::.-:.:.:::::::::::>)<::" ------.....--:::: -----===-==-=:=-:::-:::..:::..::::..:=.:-:..:::::::.----- - - - - - ----------- LOT 2 EASTBANK MINOR SUBDIVISION OVERALL BOUNDARY MAP SCALE 1 "=200' LOT 1 LOT 2 FUTURE FlRE HYDRANT {IF REQUIRED BY THE GLENWOOD SPRINGS FlRE DEPARTMENT IN FUTURE BUILDING PERMIT REVIEWS) 2"¢ WATER SERVICE TO B CAPPED ONCE THE B" LINE IS CONNECTED TO THE ROARIN FORK WATER AND SANITATION DISTRICT MAIN INSTALL FUTURE TRANSFORMER REPLACE EXISTING SERVICE WITH 2"¢ SERVICE TO TEMPORARILY---.l SERVE BOTH BUILDINGS EXISTING WELL TO BE ABANDONED ONCE THE CONNECTION TO THE FUTURE ROARING FORK WATER AND SANITATION DISTRICT SE~ .... ~6 ... ·~ END TELEPHON ~,~ ' ~ 4l!"¢ SANITARY AND GAS ~ \ SEWER MANHOLE INSTALLATION .l" INSTALL TEMPORAR~ ~ 1,500 GALLON ONE CHAMBER NORWESCO TO BE PUMPED BY TRUCKS UNTIL THE CONNECTION TO THE FUTURE SANITARY SEWER MAIN TO THE SOUlHEAST 1~ tY'IUPl~TFn FUTURE GAS/TELEPHONE/ELECTRIC SERVICE TO BE FROM THE FUTURE LINES COMPLETED AS PART OF THE SCHOOL DISTRICT ACCESS ROAD CONSTRUCTION I I ~ rJ .•. '·'· '·'· '·'· 1; :: .:: .:: .:: .:: .:: .:: .:: .:: ·. w w ___ ,. ___ _ • ---11----I --OE----OE ---T----T • +Cf 0 8S • I OE T LEGEND Ill EXISTING ASPHALT PAVING PROPOSED BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING PROPOSED GRA va CONCRETE PROPOSED 8" CLASS 52 DUCTILE IRON PIPE PROPOSED 1.5", 2", OR 4" WATER SERVICE PROPOSED 8" ¢ SDR 35 PVC SEWER MAIN PROPOSED 4"¢ PVC SEWER SERVICE PROPOSED GAS SERVICE (SIZING ANO MATERIAL PER BLACK HIUS ENERGY) PROPOSED ELECTRIC SERVICE EXISTING OVERHEAD ELECTRIC PROPOSED TELEPHONE SERVICE 4l!"¢ SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE WATER SERVICE CURB STOP PROPOSED STORM SEWER PIPE PROPOSED DRYWELL NOTE: UTILITIES LINETIPES SHADED GREY ARE SHOWN SCHEMATICALLY FOR FUTURE CONSTRUCTION. FUTURE 8"¢ WATER LINE TO BE EXTENDED WITH THE SCHOOL DISTRICT ACCESS ROAD CONSTRUCTION GRAPHIC SCALE ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 30 ft. --------------------~--- EXISTING ELECTRIC SERVICE _... _... --" URCE TO BE MAINTAINED _.-_... ~ AND METERED TILL FUTURE .-_... _... ------__...-rft--- ELECTRIC CORRIDOR IS - -_... .---:::>< - ---------------~5;'.t:~~DS~VI~~ ~gu;E------------------~oo ------ - - -- - - - - - _ _ _ _ _ INST&-LEilJ.N--8AM!"1'R'E:NCH -- - -o,£. --- - ----------___... ----0 --- MAIN IS COMPLETED _...--..---.-----~~ ----~ -_.,. -----.-.--DE --- .-_,. ---------oE ----~o<---------~-=--or.::::="' ------------~ -------------..... ---,,.,---------------~ -- - - - - - - --==-==-=-~--= --DE ·U~ ~ .-----DE----~ oE----DE ,,,,..,--// OE~ DE-------- _.-aE---- -------- OE ---.-c:c:::.l''°" ----o<----------------- z 0 Ui ~ 0:: ci z Cl 0:: ~Cl ~ " ~~ " 0:: ~ tO 6 :J ::;: lb w w !( ~ " ii: PROJECT NO. 2151007.00 MU ' ' I ' ' ' I ' ' ' J ' ' ' ) ' ' ' )> 0 ____. 0 ' , , , ' ' / , ' I ' ' l , J ' , ' \ I I I \ ' I I \ ' ' , \ ' I I ) I ) I I ' I ' ' ' I ' ' ' J zm ()) 0 ~~ O" OJ 0 -:::l Q_A (Q I f'1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I /I I I I , I I I I f'1 I I I I 069S I FUSE '1t•« ure + PO Bex 452<; ~a•alt c CJ Ill t-21 970618'>8"-l r Jlapo1nte<<"1fuseacs col"' I I I 111 I f' I I 1 ! I I I I I I I I I '"1 I I I I I I I I I 1 i I I I I I / I I I : I I 11 \ \ I \'1 \ \!'1\\ \ \ \ \ Number l 2 '~· rn • 8 Land Use Review 1111 II II I I ~ ~·· 05.09.201 6 I \ I \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ~ / I NORTH \ \ \