Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1.0 Application Rose_Part3t I t I t I I t t t I I I t -6- deposits. The Northeast Dry Park Gulch alluvium (Qadp-1 and Qadp-2) consists of matrix and clast supported deposits similar to the ailuvial fan deposits previousl)' described. The only development proposed in this area is the golf course and exploratory borings were not located in this area. zuvER ALLIJVIUIvI Alluvium (aafl deposited by the Roaring Fork fuver is present along the modern river channei and as five ten'aces (Qt-l through Qt-5) adjacent to the channel' AII of the terraces except the lowest terrace (Qt-i) appear to project below the ailuviai fans on the western valley side. Terrace levels Qt-3, Qt-4 and Qt-5 probably con'elate with the pinedale _eiacial period and. the alluvium is outrvash that rvas probabiy deposited berween 12,000 to 35,000 years ago (Kirkham and Others, 1996). The lower terraces Qt-i and Qt- 2 are younger than 12,000 years. Flood plain studies shorv that the Qt-1 ten'ace and part of the Qt-2 ten'ace are below the 100-year flood plain of the Roaring Fork River (High C ountry Engineerin g, | 997 ). The Roaring Fork alluvium is predominantly a clast-supported deposit of rounded gravel, cobbles and boulders in a sand and silty sand matrix. Some lenses of sandy silt and clay are locally present in the ailuvium. The gravel, cobbles and boulders are a variery of durabie, unweathered rock types from the upper river drainage basin' Boulders typically vary from 1 foot to 3 feet. Practical auger refusai was encountered at reiatively shallow penetration depths in the alluvium. Auger borings couid not be driiled deeper than about 2 to 7 feet in the river gravel alluvium. LOESS The exploratory borings show that the soil prohle at most boring sites have a surface layer of loess. The loess is a wind deposited sandy clay and silt' At the boring sites the loess was from 1.5 to 15 feetthick. The loess is not aiways present at the surface and it is not possibie to evaluate its thickness from surface observations. Because of this, the loess is not shown on the geologic map, Fig. 1. However, Ioess should be expected in many areas at the surface of the fans and river terraces' I I T H-P GEOTECH I I I T t I I SINKHOLES Sinkholes are known to be iocally present in the Roaring Fork and Crystal fuver valleys south of Glenrvood Springs in areas underlain by the Eagle Valley Evaporite and Eagle Valley Formation. Several large ground surface depressions that may be sinkholes were observed in the field, on the topographic map, and on the aerial photographs, see Fig. 1. In addition, smaller circular patterns were noted on the aeriai photographs that may also be associated with small sinkhoies. The larger possibie sinkholes vary from 20 to 200 feet in diameter and have ma.ximum depth of 1 to 10 feet. Most, but not all, of the possible sinkholes are located within 500 feet of the Roaring Fork River and in areas which have been flood in-igated. The sinkholes in the region appear to result from the roof collapse of subsurface voids in the shallow formation rock or by piping and caving of the surficial soiis into voids in the formation rock in areas where rock is relativeiy deep' In places to the south of the projecr area, sinkholes have developed in the terrace deposits where the terrace deposits are up to about 100 feet thick. FIELD E)CPLORA.TION The field exploration for the project was conducted on Jttly 2,3 and 8, L997 ' Twelve exploratory borings were drilled at the locations shown on Fig' 1 to evaluate the subsurface conditions. The borings were advanced wirh 4 inch diameler continuous flighr auger powered by a truck-mounted Longyear BK-5lIID driil rig' The borings were logged by a representiltive of Hepworth-Pawlak Geotech-nical, lnc' Samples of the subsoils were taken with 1% inch and 2 inch I'D' spoon samplers. The samplers were driven into the subsoils at various depths with blows from a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches. This test is similar to the standard penetrarion resr described by ASTM Method D-1586. The penetration resistance vaiues are an indication of the relative densiry or consistency of the subsoils' Depths at which the samples were Uken and the penetration resistance values ,lre shown on the Logs of Exploratory Borings, Figs. 2, 3 and 4. The samples were returned to our laboratory for review by the project engineer and testing. I t H-P GEOTECH T I T I I I I I t I T I I .8- SUBSTIRFACE CONDITIONS Graphic logs of the subsurface conditions encountered at the site are shown on Figs. 2, 3 and 4. Below about Vz to I foot of topsoil the subsoils rypicaily consist of fine-grained soils overiying relatively dense, sandy gravel, cobbies and boulders (river aliuvium) at depths between 2 to 42 f.eet. Drilling in the dense gravel wich auger equipment was difficult due to the cobbles and bouiders and drilling refusal was encounrered in rhe deposit. The upper soils are rypically low to medium plastic clay' silt and sand that are medium to stiff and loose to medium dense' Laboratory testing performed on samples obtained from the borings inciuded narural moisture content and densiry, gradation analyses and liquid and piastic limits' Results of swell-consolidation testing performed on relatively undisrurbed drive samples of rhe upper f,rne graineC soils, presenced on Figs. 6-10, generally indicate low to moderate compressibiliry under conditions of light loading and wening' The drier samples rypically showed a low to moderate collapse potenlial (senlement under constant load) when wened and moderate to high compressibiliry under increased ioading. Results of gradation analyses performed on small diameter drive samples (minus 1tl: inch fraction) of the coarser subsoiis are shown on Figs' 11 and 12' Hveem stabilometer 'R' vaiue test results perfonned on the upper silt and clay soiis are shorvn on Fig. 13 and 14. The laboratory testing is summarized in Table I' Free water was rypically not encountered in the borings at the time of driliing' Free water was encountered. in Boring i0, located in the north end of the properry' at a depth of 10 feet. The groundwater level could be relatively shallow 14 the lower' northern and eastern parts of the properry near *te Roaring Fork River' The subsoils in the higher non-irrigated areas were typically slightly moist and the subsoiis in irrigated fields were moist to very moist. GEOLOGIC SITE ASSESSMENT It should be possible to deveiop tle properfy much as proposed on the September 26,1997 Sketch Pian without encountering geologic constraints' There ale' however' several conditions of a geologic nature which should be considered in project planning I I I t H.P GEOTECH I I I I I T I I I I I I I I I I I I .9 - and design, as discussed below. The more Severe constraints are associated with alluvial fan flooding and the potentiai for sinkholes. These conditions may require some modifications to the project layout as indicated on the September 26' 199'7 Sketch Plan' ALLWIAL FAN FLOODING The ephemeral channels and alluvial fans (Qaf-1 and Qaf-2) in the project area are susceptible to debris floods and viscous debris flows (hyperconcentrated flows) associated with unusuaily intense thunderstorm precipitation or unusually heavy snowpack melt' The ailuvial fans in the project alea appeal to be geomorphically active and recurrence periods formajor flow events are probably inthe range of 50 to 500 years' Because of the potential for channel blockage, the existing fan channels shouid not be relied on to convey potential hyperconcentrated flows, unless site specific hydraulic analysis shows othenvise. The entire fan surtaces should be considered in a potentiai flood area' Nature of Hyperconcentrated Flows: Hyperconcentrated flows differ from water floods with low sediment concentrations. It is important that aliuvial fan flood hazard evaluation and mitigation consider these differences (Juilen and O'Brien,1997). Hyperconcentrated flows represent a continuous transirion between water floods and eanhflow type landslides. Watel floods typically have sediment concentrations of less than 20% by volume. Debris floods are very fluid, comparable to water floods, and rypicall,v- have sediment concentations befwee n20% and,45% by volume' Viscous debris flows are higirly viscous fluid masses that typicaiiy have sediment concentrations between 45Yo at:f1 55%byvolume. They are capable of rafting boulders neal their surface'and can travel Iong distances on moderate siopes. They form levees and iobate deposits on aliuvial fans' Granular debris flows tvpically have sediment concen5ations of greater than 50% by volume. Flow momentum and energy dissipation is largely by inter-partial dispersive stress. They attain high velocities on very steep siopes, but they also require steep slopes to remain in motion and most stop near the fan head' . The alluvial fars in the project area could experience flood hazards associated with water floods, debris floods and viscous debris flows and all three rypes of flows could occur during a single flood event. There does not appear to be a potentiai for granuiar debris flows in the project area. The flood hazard' hydraulic analysis should I H-P GEOTECH lr lr lr l: 10- account for sediment bulking and. the non-Newtonian nature of the hyperconcentrated flows. iVlitigation Concepts: The need for and type of alluviai fan flood hazard mitigation for the development should be based on a site-specific analysis by a hydrauiic engineer' Straight uniform section channels are best for conveying the water and se<iiment associated wilh debris Jloods acloss the alluvial fan. Channel bed and bank stabiliry may be critical and channei lining or other protection methods may be needed' Detention basins, deflection Structures and spreading, or channel and levee conveyance SyStemS ale best suited for vrscor.rs debris Jlow mitigation. It may be feasible to directly protect individ.ual buildings by flood proofing and building wall reinforcement at sites where flow depth, flow velocities and impact loadings are relatively small' Direct building protection can be Cesigned to provide a reasonabie level of safery for an individual building and its occupants, but direct building protection will not prevent propefry damage resulting from erosion and the deposition of mud and debris. Relariveiy large design flows should' be considered on the Northeast Dry Park Gulch alluvial fan (Qaf-l) because of irs relativeiy large drainage basin and the steep, highly erodible slopes where the gulch crosses through the biuff' If a detention basin is used for mitigation, it would have to be constructed off of the property at the fan head' Basin storage volumes can be estimated by bulking the design water flood hydrograph at the fan head by a factor of two. Mitigation with a deflection strucrwe and spreading would involve deflecting the design debns flood and debris flow to one side of the fan and spreading the flows onto open space orthe goif course away from occupied structures. To be effective the deflection stn:cture wouid have to start off the properly near the fan head. For the Northeast Dry Park Gulch fan, it appea.rs that a straight channel and levee conveyance system will prove to be the best mitigation method' The channel and levee conveyance system should start at the fan head which is off of the properry' A staight, uniform section channel wouid be constructed from the fan head to the river' The main channel would be designed to permit some overbank flow' Levees or a larger outer channel, would be constructed parallel to the main channel with an appropriate setback for storage of mud and debris. All tfiree mitigation concepts will require a maintenance plan for the removai and disposal of mud and debris' H-P GEOTECH I I T 1l - Reiatively small desi-en flows can be considered on the other alluvial fans (Qaf-2) because of the small size of their drainage basins. As shown on the September 26' 1997 Sketch Plan, the golf course should provide a buffer zone befween the upper part of these fans and the residential deveiopmenr area. It is likeiy that site-specific hydraulic analysis will show that design flow depths, flow veiocities and impact loadings are relatively low in the proposed residential area. Mitigation, if required, for the small drainage basin fans (Qaf-2) will probably be flood proofing and direct building protection. SNKHOLES The possible sinkholes shown on Fig. 1 and other sinkhoies and shailow subsurface voids that may be encountered during consguction should be avoided as building sites, road. aiignments and under$ound utiliry corridors, or site-specific srudies should be undertaken to determine if the sinkholes and voids can be stabilized. Setbacks from the possible sinkhoies should be based on site-specific studies, but for preliminary piururing a minimum selback of 20 feet is recommended. Roads can often be constructed over sinkhoies after stabilization but because oipossible furure subsidence' Settlement sensitive utiiit-v lines should still avoid the sinkhole area' The probabiiity of encountering sinkhole related problems in areas away from the possible sinkholes is considered to be low, but the developer and prospective home owners should be aware that the development can not be considered totaily sinkhoie risk free. The potential for subsurface voids should. be considered when planning site-specific fotrndation exploration at all building sites. If voids or other conditions indicative of possible problems are encountered, the site should be avoided or the feasibiiiry of mitigation considered. ivlitigation methods that can sometimes be used to reduce potential sinkhole related problems include: (1) void stabilization by grouting' or by excavation and backfilling; (2) deep foundation systems; (3) stucturally bridging the potential problem area; and (4) mat foundations or other foundation systems capable of withstanding Ioss of support over iarge areas. Even with mitigation it may not be possibie to prevent Some strucnral damage to buiidings, but it shouid be feasible to Prevent sudden building collapse and provide a reasonable level of safery for the building occupants. I t I t I H.P GEOTECH I I t I t I I 12- REGIONAL EVAPORITE DEFOR]VIATION The development is in an area where regional ground deformations have been associated with evaporite dissolution and flowage from beneath the area. It is uncertain if this deformation is stiil an active geologic process or if deformation has stopped' If ground deformation is still occurring, it is likely the deformation rates are very slorv and occur over relatively broad areas. Although the potential for ground deformation problems appears to be low, the project area can not be considered totally risk free- The risk of building damase can be reduced by special foundation designs such as a heavily reinforced mat and without a basement level. zuVER TERR.ACE ES CARPIVIENT SETBACKS In a few areas residenfiai lots are planned next to steep telrace escarpments lvhich leaC directly down to the river. ln these areas there is a potential for instability if the building site is located too close to the top edge of the escarpment. It is recommended that a minimum building site setback of 2: I (horizontai to vertical) measured from the edge of rhe river channel be considered on these lots. Building envelopes that are closer to the top of siope should be evaluated on a site specific basis. CONSTRUCTiON RELATED SLOPE I}{STABILITY We do not expecr major problems with construction related slope instabiliry associated with grading for roads and building sites if grading is not considered on slopes steeper than about 3O%. lfit is necessary to perform extensive grading on slopes steeper than 30%0, the proposed grading should be evaluated by a site specific geotechnical study' Preliminary recornmendations for site grading are presented in the Site Grading section of this report. EARTHQUAKES The project area could experience moderately stong earthquake related ground shaking. Modified lvlercaili Intensiry VI ground shaking should be expected during a reasonable service life for the d,evelopment, but the probabiliry for su'onger ground shaking is low. Intensity VI ground shaking is felt by most people and causes general alarm, but resuits in negiigible damage to structures of good design and construction' A11 H.P GEOTECH BORING 3 BORING 4 ELEV. : 5957' ELEV. = 6010' 22/12 WC=11.8 0D-11S -200=91 Ll=26 ot-!, l/12 fic=zu.o 23/17 WC=L2 00-105 -2AG2A 00:s6 3s/12 12/6.30/6 \lC=J.0 00-111 Note: Explonotion of sYnbols is shown on Fig- 5' - rnn:Fa Pl=6'R'-52 \rC=3.6 00- I 00 BORING 1 ELEV. : 6010' s /12 YiC=5.2 DO-9'l -20GA7 16h2 \YC=5.7 00:100 10 /12 3s i"" EORING 2 ELEV. : 6013' ft F' E F,. L,, -E Ll:r" Ll:st E_., j J { lt Jj d lrj Jj J J J rl I 10/12 wC=2.9 D0:78 -2Oo=7A BOTTOM OF BORING AT 45', q, q., t! I E o-q)o LOGS OF TXPLORATORY BORINGSHEPWORTH PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC.197 32f I BORING 5 ELEV. = 5966' 16h2 v{C=7.5 00-95 16/12 BORING 5 ELEV. : 5940' +/12 WC=20.2 D0=l 01 -2Oo=75tt -a1 Pl= 11 20/+ BORING 7 ELEV. : 5945' BORING B ELEV. : 5980' s/12 wc=5-g 0D-81 -20O:6J 2+/12 F, F' [,' F F,. F,' L: c)(Dtr I oa Yr€=1.6 +4-27 -200-2f 17 /12 1 J 60/12 Note: Explonotion of symbols is shown on Fig. 5. c)(u l! I o-q)o 1E /12 2s /12 10 /12 we2-2 -20O-39 LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGSHEPWORTH PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC.197 327 rl l, rl lt rl ll { lr rl rl rl I I I I I I I I rl :, rl rl rl rl rl rl rl ll I I I I I I I t I BORING 9 ELEV. : 5998' BORING 1O ELEV. : 5930' 10/12 12h2 542 Vrc=11.+ D0-95 6/12 3+12 Note: Explonotion of symbols is shown on Fig. 5- BORING 11 EORING 12 ELEV. : 5942' ELEV. : 5926' 31/12 WC=7.4 D0-9+ -2Oo=77LL-37 Pl= 19 50/6 /12 1 _) /12 () o,t! I E o- c)o iytz --' l-20G8JI lu-:o5s=tzi lx'=zg't/tz I Vrt=28.5 DD-90 q,) c) LL I o-(,o LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGSHEPWORTH PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC.197 327 1s/12 LEGEND: A TOPSOIL: orqonic cloyey silt, dry to moist' light brown nlhJ jj i ll Jj d t I I I t I I I I t to dork brown. n 6LAY (CL); silty, sondy, medium stiff to stiff, slightly moist to very moist' brown' low to medium L_] plosiicity, slightly Porous ond colcoreous' n S1LT AND CLAY (ML-CL): slighily sondy to sondy, medium stiff to stiff' slighily moist' Iight brown' A low plosticitY. a w W EAI ffi h Relotively undisturbed drive somple; 2-inch l.D. Colifornio liner somple' l_r ( Sef ), t :/a-inch l.D- split spoon somple' ASru D - 1586' :9 blows of o 140-pound hommer foiling 30 inches were sompler 12 inches- Free woter level in boring of time of drilling' Coved depth when checked on July 8' 1 997' _f.Procticolrigrefusol.Whereshownobovebottomofboring,ind.icotesthotmultipleottempts | *".. mode to odvonce the boring' NOTES: 1. Exptorotory borings were drilled on July 2, 3 ond 8, 1997 with o 4-inch diometer.continuous flight POwer ouger. 2. Locotions of explorotory borings yrere meosured opproximotely by pocing from feotures shown -- on the site plon providld by High Country Engineering' j. Erevotions of exprorotory borings were estimoted trom the contour pron- The rogs ore drown io depth' 4. The explorotory boring rocotions ond elevotions shourd be considered occurote only to the degree implied by the method used' 5. The rines between moteriols shown on the exprorotory boring rogs represent the opproximote boundories -' between rnoteriol types ond tronsitions moy be groduol' 6. woter level reodings shown on the logs were mo.de of the time ond under the conditions indicoted' fluctuotion in woter rever moy o""u. '*itn ti-u. No free woter wos encountered in the borings when SILT (ML); scndy, scottered grovet, stiff, moist' light brown' SAND AND SILT (SM-ML); grovetly. some cobbles, loose to medium dense, slightly moist' mixed browns' shole frogments- SAND AND GRAVEL (SM-GM); sitty, cobbles. medium dense' sliqhtly moist', brown' GRAVEL, COBBLES AND BOULDERS (GP-GM); slightly silty' sondy' dense', slightlv moist to wet below woter levet, brown, rounded river terrqce rock' j Drive somple; stondord penetrotion Drive somPle blow count; indicotes I /12 required to drive the Colifornio or L_- I I Disturbed bulk somPle' l__r checked on JulY 8, 1 997' 7. LoborotorY Testing Results: Y'16 = Woter Content (%) DD : Dry Density ( p.f ) +4 = Pircent retoined on No' 4 -2OO = Percent possing No' 200 sieve' LL:LiquidLimit(Z) Pl = Plosticity lndex ( Z )-R- = Hveem 'R' Votue test thoi SPT ---1 LEGEND AND NOTESHEPWORTH PAWLAK GEOTECII N ICAL, IN C.197 327 a: j ,a: ,r;- I+ ":u -a: aa-: BCRING 16 ELEV. : 5942.4' ru,,,, "-ft{ilu" W*^, ffi:i7..ffirTr BORING 15 ELEV. : 5929.5' Fie. BORING .I4 ELEV. = 5923.1' 21h2 26/12 Note: Explonotion of symbols is shown BORING 13 ELEV. : 591 2.J' 0 - so/o + IU 40 I I I I lrr [.l ll I lr' lr rJ h lr lr h lr lr llr I nt szz HEPWORTH PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, IN C. LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS 2Fis. BORING 17 ELEV. = 6004.1' BORING -I8 ELEV. = 600J-5' BORING 19 ELEV. = 6036.5' 1a/12 wC=4.7 -200=7J 1o/2.1o/o I I I l,I lrI lrl lrI t: lt: 2E/12 wc=2.9 D0- I 07 -2oA=62 zE/12 36h2 WC=f,.4 00= I 0r -2OO:A7 Jo /6,1o /o Note: ExPlonotion of symbols is shown on Fig' 4. o 4.,tL I o- C'o LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGSHEPWOR TH P AWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC.197 327 o,2/5/s8 a il n ffi EEI ffi +l, LEGEND: dhl ToPSOIL: SILT AND C sligh ily col< CLAY (cL); SANO AND moist to t GRAVEL. CI below wote SILTSTONE. non-cemel RelotivelY t Drive soml I F I Drive som8/12 required t 4/sa Depth ; Prociicol -r Coved deg A Section o A 7o/5o in, TES: ExplorotorY bc used 4-inch diomeier conl Locotions of Elevotions of The exPlorcto by the meth< The lines bet between mot Woter level r' fluctuction ir LoborotorY T' WC : Woter DO = Drv 0t 1. 2. :( +. 5. 6. 7. |LAY (ML-CL); sondY, :oreous ond Porous. sil ty. sondY, medium 'gonic sil t ond cloy, medium dork brown, frozen. sccttered grcvel, stiff to stiff, moist, brown, to very stiff, slighily moist. light bro low plosficity. GRAVEL (su_cu): silty' scottered cobbles, silt ond cloy loyers, loose ,et with depth, brown. 3BBLES AND EOULDERS (GM-GP): slighily silty, sonciy, dense' slightly rr level. brown, rounded river terroce rock' -SANDSTONE-CLAYSTONE: Eogle Volley Evoporite' hord to very hord' nted, mixed groY, red' ond brown' undisturbeddrivesomple;2-inchl.D.Coliforniolinerscmple. to medium moist to wt m oderotelY test ( SPT ), 1 3/8-inch l-D. split sPoon somple' ASTil thot 28 blows of o 'l 4O-pound hcmmer folling 30 inche SPT sompler 12 inches. drilling ond when checked on Februory 5' 1998' rle; stondord Penetrotion ple blow count: indicotes o drive the Colifornio cr to free woter of time of riq refusol. rth when checked on Februory 5'1998' dvoncedwithNXcontinuouscoreusingwoterforcirculotion. Cicotes core recoverY/RaO' rrinqs were drilled on December 16-30, 1997 ond Jcnuory 6' 1998' Eorings 1J on cosing odvoncer. Ao.ing.-i5-19 used 7 1/4 inch hollow tt"m o'qer ond 4-inch :inuous flight ouger. explorotory borings were provided by High Country Engineering' explorotory borings were provided by High Country Engineering' rry boring locotions ond clevotions should be considered occurote only to the d:g :J used. ween moteriols shown on the explorotory boring logs represent the opproximote t ".iot typ"t ond tronsitions moy be groduol' eodings shown on the logs were mode of the time ond under lhe conditions indi< r wotlr level moY occur with time' esting Results: Content ( Z ) :ns;ty ( Pcf ) -200 = Percent possing No' 2C0 sieve UC = Unccnfined Cornpressive Strength den se, r - 1585. were ree imPlied :oundories :oted. psf LEGEND AND NOTES Fig. 4 197 327 HEPWORTH PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC' I r.rr "ffirr @! (, N)! I RENCH ,/'- suRF ACt DEPRESSION HBI:r+lz-1ol F;_€ e;^i3[Lr" ?l'J"io',i^tr.^ND vER,c AL ra'w .-l1 rn-Z c)T N Zo Cr{ 1lAo-rlrrrla LEGEND: F-.Il FILL: sondy silt ond cloy. loose' l-l,l m"ist, dork brown, sow dust ond f^"1 some trosh. f,St tOeSOtt-; sllqhtly sondy sllty cloy' LV "rgonics, roots, dork N\ urourn, frozetr <rt surfoce' cUV (ct-); silty, sondY, medium stiff, moist, brown, low PlostlcitY, non-stro tif led. rsl GRAVEL AND coBBLES (cP-ct"l); [S) tonay. sllty, scottered boulders' P\ atn.", posslblY loosened below dePresslon ln Trenclt 2, molst, brown. ii'li'i'Ti'i'i"'i TRENCH -n I (, Ntlr[[[I I : I TRENUH *ffi x ixi xi{fi xiai;i:i:iri:i rX.l:X:X:X:XiXiXiliX;l;l;l;l;;;;t' \i:i:iri:i:i:i:i:i:iiiii.i,i,i.t-I X X X'X X X X X X X X x x xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,^x'-x"x"x"x'-x x x x x x x x x"x-'x'-x"x x .x-_x._x.,x-x-x-x-x-xvxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)tx x x x x x x x x x x x)fHxxxxxxx\xxx,l,\x x x x x x x x x x l,- |lYr'r*r**"r"*l/lf r l- l.- l.- l.- t.- I l.- t-I l.- l.- l- l.- l-- l- t-I l.- t- t- t- l- t- l- l- t.- t- l- l- l.- l- t- l- l.- t- t-I t- t- l- l.- l- l.- l- t- t- t- l- l- l- l- t- I l.- t-I l- I t- l- t-I l-II t- l- l.- l- l- t- t- l- l- I l-- l- l- t- t- T I l-- l- [\ t- l- l- l- t- l.- l- I l.- l- t- I- ri l- t- l- l- t- t- l-IrIr l- t- l- t- l- t- l-- l- l- t.- t-l$ iIf J(o{ (, N! ormrno! ---r trdo6nil c>l FI_{ 6-x -{f, rnZ C)- + z(] (n -Uno:!t-rna N 75'E FILL; sondy sllt ond cloY, loose, moist. dork brown, sow dust ond some trosh. TRENC|i 5 VV loesoY slightly sondY [f.l sitty cloy, orgonlcs, roots, Vt1 rnoisl, dork brown. llFl CLAY (CL): slltY, sondY, liil '""0'" stlrr' molst' brown' 6;l GRAVEL (GP-GM); sondY, AS sllty, with cobles, relotlvelY P I dense, molst, brown. NoTE: HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL SCALE ARE EQUAL J5 40 Wfif*Si:i:i:ixitiff,^x'-x"x''x'-x x x x . x x x x x x x xlxxxxx DISTANCE - FEET tf i-rl-ri-ri ri l- Ill-li-li-lIlltiiititilrili+[lIr iIr[[[i[[ t It IL lI F Lr..l Ldl! I =F o- trJo TRENCH 1 SURFACf DEPRISSION DISTANCE _ FEET LEGEND: /) rorro,r, sondy silt ond cloy, orgonics, roots' moist' dork brown' M r,Tl ll-[ cr_nv (cu): sitty, sondy, medium stiff. moist, reddish brown. t\t Kl a*o*L (cp-cM); sondy, silty, occosionol smoll boulders, relotively kd F LJ UJtL I =F o- UJU EAST dense, moist, brown- TRENCHlAND6PROFILESHEPWORTH PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC.19-/ 327 IU IJ 10 15 '1r- -,.,1 ]l!- \ r.l ?1i3660a IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 6 c .t(\\ 't-- t'oI t \t o 3E3E i!gs;6 d9>r5 !E H''s; E 06 u u iE ,; :E , * E ,E E EE Egi=" x! ;c E *iii i: qr s; 3: HE Ei H: iE Iiii ie iE [i :g ;i E: H; iE :i ii?;itt:a:Eig3EiHsHs o \ !Ea '\ AS,+( e --: ,f.! Ir =f t) tl Ot1'6,Ot )ll_l , rlltl tl'.. :\ N, U ,li'lr r-\-;:' .' ,;\ - r.:, : :. .t^ ;!...-;r,-;;4..'--; \ i r.: - j. i '' '-'j :')]I A,' !'(' t , ,')'.' . '.'il L , f-ii ii I: ,,i 'li,'. 'l't! i tt I 'i i' $ii lri r i t t r. ,'rr,-\,1\:. .q i' f,i -d,m d. \*)> 6 ;-^--- d:- r tr',,r,. i. 'i I t Ii7 I I I I I I I I I 970- 945- 1253 P -04 y.u5L ,rt r .l . FIGLiRg 1 WESTBANK - LOCATION MAP O.R TEST AND HONITOR WELLS N I I ( ) \ I I I I I I t .\ \ ;S"'t ''a \') ')\ \..-o) .., Ja.') )/-Y )r ' .\ \1,. '- ,l\\ '. Nt\ic- i\'I.1' 'l ra t 1tI I t it \I\ EXPLAI.IATI O}{ -581 C- - Apprcx:mate gror.nc,"rater contours on 't2/'i5/92 EII - .\Ituviar deposits tiF ffi.1 - colluv:a] deg:slrs (geolcgry fron - ',lGS hvironnental Gec1c.*, No. 8) r: _- - \t I .\"-" /..J---=.-.-*};;j-.--_-_1.r'-\'$. ' '- ls - , \\ \a ^(;A, ri ,J; ..11 .:\ \ P -02970-945-1253.-lun- 17-94 Ol:27P -( I \ i I I I lr lr lr lr l: l: l: $:ifl$,q,; DtjAvx nJ. COPY 078_ I I lr lr lr lr lr l: t: l: -wELacoNSTRucrloN AND TEST REPoRT STATE OF CoLoRADO, OFFICE OF THE STAT-E.ENGINFER 5. GEOLOGIC LOG : Onest TESTING METHOD : Air CornPressor J; L;-; ; 1e fr' Date'/rirne Meaeured Purnprng Level : Totd ft' Date/Tine Maasured .-.--ffi;ffi.ffiruJ H ir;;$-; i dme t niorrrc l cofifnedion :- shefiorr Driul-s corp'^ . -,. 05/05/98 05/05/98 Produetiott Raie : Test Length : 20O+ gPm' 2 hrs. s274182 0907/98 r lLt Ndk,J'tl'ti APPFIOVa il Gvrs3I-8 1 -03 WELL PERMIT NUT'TBER lrlailltg Addrass City, St. ZP: Phone 0/6 0203 Westbank Rosd Glenwood SPrir€s, Co. 81601 (e7o) 915-2E8s DISTAI.ICES FROM SEC. LINES:2339 ft. from LOT BLOCK West Sec' line, OR FtLING(uNlT)1312 ff. from STREET sDREgS Ar wLL Lm{Tlo=N; DEPTH COMPLETED 101 5, F{oll DIAH. (h) WATERLOCATED : 52'75 REI,IARKS : Material: Stzo: lntenal: Nams fiitle (Ptease WiIn" iielton I Piesiaent ( I I I Rernarks : 'grok-e n Rircks" CtaYdShal es Type : Depth ; ---- L lAJ I.r;. tlit iirij:?jijDi il l,r,t I I lr lr lr lr lr t: t: WELL CONSTRUCTION AND TEST REPORT STATE OF COLORADO, oFFlcE oF THE STATE ENGiTEER i welu PERirlr NUMBER MH-30568 Mailing Address : % P Q. Box 1908 City, St" ZiP.Glernvood Spnngs, Co, 81602 Phone (970) 9415700 ia ffi-]a-Sec. 0t DISTANCES FROM SEC, LINES ft. frorn Sec. line. and fr. from BLOCK APPROVAL B G\4631-91 -33 ilp,l7s- __nin!E-egw--- ur Sec. lire. OR FILING(UNlr)LOTSUBOIVISION: STREET ADDRESS AT V\ELL LOCATION I TOTAL DEPTH DEPTH COMPLETED 6 HCLE DIAM (in)FROM (tl 5. GEOLOGIC LOG .0--Oa* :- iype o7,va',erffirzEEoror-no-nnq.-90 Dirt, rocks 5 v (Brc,,,,rr Sha h/Ciarf , S S 1 Brourn SS --1 -Grav Snate - r-.t1\..---...- -- - -4t* \nfall rrcm if-r-l--ToTnl t grc, sr lqrs - /-L---...- -. - -u* --' lr'r'-'r t ' z t -t *l -t-'Lt\- .0 I PERF._ t--l 7.0 errsEt-Slzr:.4d--l--25-lSteel q itcr WATER LOCATED REI.,IARKS : 25+ Maerial: Size: lntenEu : 10 fest 16 ft. OateJTirn€ Measured :Production Rale : Test Length I Pumping Level : Total ft. Date/Tinre Measured : rccl' Y*'lJ' ;;r";;;'c *g.r so c p'mo: r ' EJ'* 1 m'ffimr I Fhorre : (97O) 9274182 @NTMCTOR : Sheton &illing CorP' Wayne Shelton / President .{rtt-lo-'j'i !li}l ;,J,5i r.trt Siill"Tt}l ;,ltLt i}it ii Type , Depth : Y/\)-J+a-lzaJ .STITTC VATER LEVEL VELL 15, H$I5f*o*#Ek RIVER 16,3' 36', - 7', OD .25 VALL Slu rco srEEL csc 34', - 7' O! ,a5 VALL PLAIN STEEL CSC 15' 5' E.D, PVCF MILL SLT]T GRI]UND LEVEL CASING E' ABOVE TOTAL DEPTH 43' vL - J4r I t I lr lr lr lr l: l: t: I I I t3r Ct]83LES CLAY 3II.I-DERS -A.rlttAr,#F"roF nH*nG8)r r r r Bulk Density (g/cm3) Soils Data O.C. Field Fraction Capacity (s S) (cm3/cm3) Hydrology Data Flow Recharge Length Rate (cm) (cm/yr) Pesticide II Pesticide Data Koc I I I I I I I Soil Series Soil Half-Life (v0 Retard'n TravelFactor Time (v0 Decay Attenuation Rate Factor (1tyr) Sandy Loam and Loam Soils 1.585 1.585 1.585 1.585 1.585 1.585 1.585 1.585 1.585 1.585 0.0153 0.0153 0.0153 0.0153 0.0153 0.0153 001s3 0.0153 0.0153 0.0153 0.239 0.239 o.239 0.239 0.239 0.239 0.239 0.239 0.239 0.239 0.239 0.239 0.239 0.239 0.239 0.239 0.239 0.239 0.239 0.239 0.239 0.239 5.15E+OO 1.40E+00 6.55E+00 2.10E+OO 3.00E+02 4.22E+O2 4.62E41 1.54E+O1 5.81E{O1 6.14E+01 9.41E+O1 4.75E{O1 2.10E+O0 2.48E+o1 1.25E+O3 6.24E+O1 8.62E+01 6.56E+Ol 1-o4ErO1 1.21E1o2 3.23E+OO 1.92E+o1 1.585 0.0153 1.585 0.0153 1.585 0.0153 1.58s 0.0153 1.585 0.0153 1.585 0.0153 1.585 0.0153 1.58s 0.0153 1.585 0.O153 1.585 0.0153 1.585 0.0153 1 585 0.0153 RF = (1 +((BD'oC'Koc)/FC) fl = ((FL'RF'FC)/RR DR = 0.693/T 1/2 AF = @EXPCDR'TT) O.C. Fraction based on soil samples O.M. content of 2.630A for 12'depth FL = 17' for conservative assumption Recharge = 15.78 cm w/peak irrigation demand Bulk Density estimated mean value of sandy loam and loam by weighing known volume from soil samples at site F.C. taken from PRZM manual for mean value of soil type average of sandy loam and loam 30.480 1s.780 30.480 15.780 30.480 15.780 30.480 15.780 30.480 15.780 30 480 15.780 30.480 15.780 30.480 15.780 30.480 15.780 30.480 15.780 30.480 15.780 30.480 15.780 30.480 15.780 30.480 15.780 30.480 15.780 30.480 15.780 30.480 15.780 30 480 15.780 30.480 15.780 30.480 15.780 30.480 15.780 30.480 15.780 gluphosinate-H 2,4-D-H MCPP.H dicamba-H pendimethalin-H chlorpyrifos-l halfenicide-l imidacloprid-l azoxystrobin-F chloroneb-F fenarimol-F iprodione-F metalaxyl-F myclobutanil-F PCNB-F propiconazole-F thiomethyl-F MBC-metab triadimefon-F vinclozolin-F cimectacarb-GR paclobutrazol-GR 100 0.027 20 0.016130 0.033 35 0.025 6390 0.0339000 0.027 ??? ???319 0.0191230 0.058 1300 0.3562000 0.329 1004 0.082 35 0.044519 0.055 26600 0.4111323 0.2001830 0.003'1390 0.096213 0.0332580 0.07759 0.003400 0.134 1.11E+01 3.03E+00 1.42.E+01 4.55E+00 6.49E+02 9.14E+02 1.OOE+OO 3.34E+Ol 1.26E+O2 1.33E+02 2.O4E+O2 1.03E+02 4.55E+00 5.37E+O't 2.7O8+O3 1.35E+O2 1.87E+o2 1.42E+oz 2.26E+O1 2.63E+o2 6.99E+0O 4.'t6E+01 2.57E+O1 4.33E+01 2.10E+O1 2.77E+O1 2.10E+01 2.57E+O1 ERR 3.65E+01 'l .19E+01 1.95E+00 2.11E+OO 8.458+00 1.58E+01 1.26E+Ol 1.69E+O0 3.46E+00 2.31E+O2 7.22E+ffi 2.10E+O't 9.0OE{O0 2.31E+O? 5.17E+OO 4.37E-s8 4.95E-27 1.79E60 5.08E-26 0.00E+00 0.00E+OO ERR 9.90E-245 43/,E-302 1.35E-52 7.55EA7 4.96E-'t75 4.2sE-15 2.7gE-'.t36 0.OOE+OO 1.12E-94 0.OOE{OO 2.70E-2o,6 6.25E-96 0.O0E+OO 0.00E+o0 7.60E44 : REfrrffE lrfrfltnfrr frEs*rrnc*S c^rttsrrfrrril,, ilyc,I Kirk H. Beattie, Ph.D. 1546 E. 12th S#eef Rifle, CO 81650 B Office: 970-625{599 E-Mail: beattie@imageline.com Fax: 970-625{600 WWW: http://cccweb.com/beattie Home: 970-625{598 WWW: http://cccweb.com/beattie2 Mobile: 9T0-209-2263 AN ASSESSMENT OF THE LIKELIHOOD OF THE ROSE RANCH DEVELOPMENT AFFECTING GREAT BLUE HERON NESTING SUCGESS Prepared for Roaring Crystal Alliance and Roaring Fork lnvestments 19563 East Mainstreet, Suite 200 Parker, CO 80138 Prepared by Kirk H. Beattie, Ph.D. Beattie Natural Resources Consulting, lnc. 1546 E. 12th Street Rifle, GO 81650 c- *'*- 6 & April 6, 1998 q;..- {rr 1|1[lg,_ MAY ! ri 1,!s ii ii- --J) I T I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I t t ROSE RANCH DEVELOPMENT AND GREAT BLUE HERONS PAGE 1 ASSESSMENT OF THE LIKELIHOOD OF THE ROSE RANCH DEVELOPMENT AFFECTING GREAT BLUE HERON NESTING SUCCESS I previously prepared a report on wildlife of the Rose Ranch. This document was followed by another report I prepared which addressed comments/deficiencies noted by reviewers of the Planned Unit Development proposal and sketch plan. Roaring Fork lnvestments (RFl), the developer of the Rose Ranch PUD, requested that I address concerns which have been raised about the potential for harm to nesting great blue heron s (Ardea herodias) which might result from conversion of the Rose Ranch to a golf courseihousing development. RFI gave me total discretion as to the manner and mechanics of addressing the concern about nesting great blue herons. While working on a consulting job in California, I conducted a moderately thorough review of scientific literature related to the great blue heron, concentrating my search on previous studies which had examined the impact of human disturbance on nesting great blue herons. I was unable to review several studies because of unavailability at the University of California-Davis library. However, I do not believe my findings, conclusions, and recommendations reported herein would have been altered by review of these studies- I reviewed articles for their scientific merit and have included 28 documents in a binder which has been provided to the Roaring Crystal Alliance. Several of the articles are not supportive of a non-impact finding with respect to nesting great blue herons. As a scientist I am obligated to provide a nonpartisan review and'to piovidE contlUsiond "'*' and recommendations based on facts and inferences from fact. lP (stssiLD cot rqTY n I!t I T I I I I t t I I I I t I I I I I I ROSE RANCH DEVELOPMENT AND GREAT BLUE HERONS PAGE 2 A great blue heron rookery is located on the east bank of the Roaring Fork River. The rookery is located across the river from where homes are proposed to be built. Based on a conversation I had in 1997 with Larry Green and Kevin Wright, Colorado Division of Wildlife District Wildlife Managers, there were 12 great blue heron nests in this rookery in 1997 and 10 of lhe 12 nests were occupied by great blue herons. I talked with Larry Green on April 2, 1998, and he related that on March 14, 1998, he observed 8 herons on 6 nests on the west side of the river. Mr. Green had not revisited the site since March 14. I visited the site on April 6, 1998 and observed heron nests in 4 cottonwood trees. Three trees each contained 2 nests and a fourth tree contained 4 nests, for a total of 10 nests. Only one of the 10 nests did not appear to be currently used by herons. I observed herons incubating and standing on or near 7 of the nests. At least 5 nests contained incubating herons. On April 6, 1998 I observed 4 heron nests located in a single cottonwood tree across the river from and to the northwest of the aforementioned rookery (rookery, heronry, colony, and colony-site are terms used interchangeably). Three of the nests were occupied by a single heron. I walked to within 120 feet of the tree, in open view of the herons, and they did not flush from their nests. Larry Green and Kevin Wrlght have suggested that the housing/golf course development will result in non-use of these nests. I believe that there is a reasonable possibility that this may occur. lf herons abandon nests in this tree, there are sufficient numbers of available nesting trees across the river and along the river to the north and south of this area. Mr. Green and Mr. Wright have related to me that their primary concern is the larger rookery lccated I I I I I I I I I I I I t I I I I I I ROSE RANCH DEVELOPMENT AND GREAT BLUE HERONS PAGE 3 across the river from the Rose Ranch. This rookery is reported to be the last remaining rookery of significant size in the Roaring Fork Valley' The general area of the larger rookery was originally proposed as a floater's park for use by people rafting down the Roaring Fork River. The area is now proposed by the developer to be a wildlife sanctuary and heron refuge. The developer previously proposed that an area across the river from the heron rookery be designated as a fishing park. This proposed use has subsequently been withdrawn. The question to be addressed in this report is: ,,Witt development of the Rose Ranch as proposed by RFI negatively impact great btue herons nesting in the rookery located on the 6 acre parcel previousty designated as a Floaters Park?" I will provide a brief review of facts and conclusions contained in journal articles, government documents, and other material provided to the Roaring Crystal Alliance. Before addressing reports specific to great blue herons, I will digress. There are many factors that influence wildlife responses to humans. These factors include characteristics of the disturbance and characteristics of the particular wildlife species. Characteristics of the disturbance that shape wildlife responses include the type of human activity, specific behaviors of a person, predictability, frequency and magnitude, timing, and location. Characteristics of wildlife that affect their response to humans include the type of animal, group size, age, sex, breeding status, and stage of breeding/nesting. The most important factors affecting wildlife response to humans are predictabitity and perceived threat. When wildlife perceive a disturbance frequent enough to be expected and nonthreatening, they show little overt response. lf wildlife I T lrlr lr lr lr l: ROSE R,ANCH DEVELOPMENT AND GREAT BLUE HERONS PAGE 4 perceive disturbance as unpredictable and threatening, they react quite differently' As a case in point, during the week of Novemb er 17 ,1997, a photograph of bighorn sheep appeared in the Glenwood Post. The bighorn sheep, normally very solitary and wary' showed ritile overt response to hundreds of cars travering close to them along l-70. This was because the automobile traffic was predictable and nonthreatening. However, if a car had stopped and the occupants had exited the vehicle and began screaming and throwing rocks at the sheep, they would likely have fled in panic' wildlife response to humans depends on predictability and perceived threat. I have provided a variety of articles to the Roaring Crystal Alliance related to great blue herons. An extensive description of the natural history, biology, and ecology of the great blue heron is provided by Butler (1996). A briefer, more succinct account can be found in Butler (1993b). My literature review produced only one study conducted in colorado which examined the impact of human disturbance on nesting great blue herons' Vos et al' (1985) examined the response of breeding great blue herons to human disturbance in north-central colorado. The study was conducted at Fossil creek and Lonetree reservoirs in north-central colorado from 1981-1982. Fossil creek Reservoir contained a single heron colony and Lonetree Reservoir contained two subcolonies approximately 400 yards apart. Study sites were visited twice a week between March 15 and July 21, 1gg1 and March 6 and July 20, 1gg2. on each day of observation the colonies were watched for 6 hours. Heron response to human intrusions within 330 feet of the coronies was recorded. Arso, any human activity outside 330 feet that causecj herons to react was recorded. Reactions of herons were grouped into three categories (1) I t I t I I I t t t t t I I I I I I I ROSE RANCH DEVELOPMENT AND GREAT BLUE HERONS PAGE 5 none or minimal response (no herons flushed from their nests), (2) local response (temporary abandonment of nests in the area closest to the intrusion), and (3) general response (temporary abandonment of some nests throughout the rookery). The researchers initially planned to monitor only uncontrolled intrusions (e.9. hikers walking in area near rookeries). However, because uncontrolled intrusions were low and irregularly spaced in 1981, experimental intrusions were conducted in 1982. The experimental intrusions consisted of four types of human activity: (1) a person approaching the heronry on foot, (2) a person riding a motorcycle past the heronry, (3) a tractor being operated near the heronry, and (4) a motorized boat passing the heronry. Uncontrolled human intrusions within 330 feet of the rookeries in 1980 caused no herons to flush from their nests in 67% of the cases, caused local responses during 27o/o, and caused general responses in only 6% of the cases (Vos et al. 1985:16). The types of intrusion included people on foot, motor vehicles, motorcycles, people on horseback, boaters, airplanes, helicopters, and hot air balloons. There was a total of 323 uncontrolled intrusions in 1980 (Graul 1981 ). Two-thirds of all types of uncontrolled human intrusions within 330 feet of the rookeries did not result in any herons flushing from nests. The closest homesite on the Rose Ranch from the heronry would be more than twice the Vos et al. study distance of 330 feet. Vos et al. (19S5) noted that all uncontrolled boat intrusions that elicited a local response was caused by slow-moving boats or canoes that were maneuvered directly under trees with nests. The researchers reported that general respcnses (herons flushing from nests throughout the rookery) were often elicited when people I I il lr lr lr lr ROSE RANCH DEVELOPMENT AND GREAT BLUE HERONS PAGE 6 approached the heronry on foot early in the breeding season (e'g' a general response occurred at Lonetree Reservoir on May 2, 1981, when four people approached the heronry and one climbed a nest tree)' The average distance at which herons reacted to experimental intrusions ranged from 200-460 feet in March to less than 300 feet in April through July' Beyond 460 feet' the experimental intrusions (people walking on foot, people riding motorcycles' a tractor being operated near a rookery, and a motorized boat passing the rookery) did not cause herons to flush from nests. Vos et al. (1985:17) reported that the distance at which herons responded to human disturbance varied with the stage of nesting: Great blue herons were most responsive to human intrusions early in the breeding season (late February and early March), flushing from their nests at the slightest disturbance and not returning untilthe cause was no longer present.Duringegg.layingandincubation,heronsappearedtobeless willing to abandon nests and returned more readily. Attachment to the nest further strengthened in May when young were present' ln June and July when nestlings were older and trees were in full foliage, it was sometimes possible to enter a heronry without causing any herons to flush' sullivan and Payne (1988) reported that adult herons did not flush from nests when researchers walked below the nests. Nestlings near the researchers were often fed' indicating that the herons were not prevented from feeding their young by the researcher,s presence. other researchers have reported similar findings (Horvath and Moholt 1986, Parsons 1995). I I I lr lr lr lr t: t: ROSE RANCH DEVELOPMENT AND GREAT BLUE HERONS PAGE 7 A change in responsiveness of great blue herons to humans as it varies with the stages of nesting was reported by Butler (191 :1 1 ) in a study of great blue herons in British Columbia: The distance at which herons began to fly from colony-sites in British Columbia varied greatly between nine colonies around the Strait of Georgia in 1gg1 . Herons at the most sensitive colony-site near Quamichan Lake flew from nests when I approached within 660 feet of the colony a few days before they laid eggs. After eggs were laid one could approach within about 330 feet of the colony before herons left their nests and within about B0 feet oncetheyhatchedtheireggs.onecouldapproachwithin35feetofthe colony before herons flew from nests with chicks. These results suggest that a 1,000 foot buffer zone in which no access is permitted from February to late August will adequately prevent abandonments of British columbia colonY-sites bY humans on foot' An important point needs to be made in response to the above statements' Butler studied great blue herons at 9 colonies in British columbia. At the most sensitive colony site, herons flew from nests during the early breeding season when Butler approached within 650 feet of the colony. Butler (1991 :1 1 ) then concludes: "These results suggest that a 1,000 foot buffer zone in which no access is permitted from February to late August will adequately prevent abandonments of British columbia colony-sites by humans on foot." science is based on facts and inferences' and conclusions drawn from facts must be logical and compatible. lt is not appropriate to recommend a 1,000 foot buffer zone around a rookery when the reccmmendation is not I t t T I I I I I I I t I I I I I t I ROSE RANCH DEVELOPMENT AND GREAT BLUE HERONS PAGE 8 supported by facts. Butler recommends a 1,000 foot buffer from February to late August despite contradictory evidence: 1. Herons at the most sensitive colony were not disturbed by human activities beyond a distance of 650 feet. Presumably, herons at less sensitive colonies would not have been disturbed during the early part of the nesting season at some unknown distance closer than 650 feet. 2. Afler early April (egg-laying), herons were not flushed from nests by human activity at distances ranging from 33-330 feet from the nesting colonY. Bufler (1991:10) states that "...no heavy development such as logging or construction should occur within 3,2g0 feet of a colony-site and no aircraft should fly within a vertical distance of 2,100 feet during the nesting seasons." However, Bufler does not offer facts to support his recommendation. Werschkul et al. (1976) determined that heron nest sites within 4g5 feet of a logging operation were inactive, while nests 720 feet from the logging were active. ln Florida, Kushlan (1979) studied the effects of both helicopters and airplanes on colonial wading birds (such as great blue herons) and found that neither type of aircraft drastically disturbed colonies when flying at altitudes as low as 200 feet. ln Ohio, Grubb (1979) studied the effects of aircraft on herons by flying at distances of 100-9OO feet about the ground. He reported that herons did not flush from nests when approached by aircraft flying at various altitudes' Taylor et al. (1gg2) reported that a helicopter approaching within 60 feet of nests at a coiony in I I I lr lr lr lr l: l: ROSE RANCH DEVELOPMENT AND GREAT BLUE HERONS PAGE 9 lndiana caused 50% of the herons to flush. A helicopter hovering 60 feet above most wildlife would almost certainly cause the wildlife to react, and quite possibly to panic. Returning to the study by Vos et al. (1985), the researchers reported that differences occurred in heron responses to different types of human disturbance, with most boating activity causing the least disturbance. The authors suggested that because boating activity was common near the rookeries' the herons may have become habituated to passing boats (as also reported in a study in Florida by Meyerriecks [1960]). Based on facts, Vos et al. (1985:138) concluded: ""'herons habituate to repeated, nonthreatening activities such as fishermen boating past a heronry, as opposed to unexpected disturbances such as people walking below nest trees or a motorcycle passing the heronry" (also supported by Burger 1981)' Vos et al' (1985) and Taylor et al. (1982) concluded that vegetative screening such as trees and fences which make human activities less visible will reduce disturbance impacts on great blue herons. Based on their study, Vos et al. (1985) recommended establishment of buffer zones free from human activity around heron nesting sites. They recommended a buffer zoneof g20 feet on land and 500 feet on water. These distances represented the greatest distances at which human activities caused herons to flush from nests at any time during the breeding season, plus an additional 165 feet' The additional 165 feet was added because: 1) herons may be disturbed prior to flushing from nests' and 2) herons may be physiologically stressed before flushing from nests (see also Thompson et al. 1968). The authors qualified their recommended buffer zone widths: ,,Each heronry should be examined independently because heron response varies I t I I I I I I I I I I I t I I I I I ROSE RANCH DEVELOPMENT AND GREAT BLUE HERONS PAGE 10 significanfly between sites. vegetation structure and the past history of human activity at a site may require less or greater distances for buffer zones depending on the situation" (vos et al. 1985:20). Herons accustomed to nesting in remote, wilderness- type areas not normally associated with human activity will likely be more disturbed by human activity than birds typically breeding within sight and sound of human activity' The larger rookery on the Rose Ranch is separated from proposed homesites by the Roaring Fork River. A calculated western buffer zone for this rookery would be approximately 660 feet based on findings by Vos et al. (1985). The 660 feet figure is intermediate between the land-only case of 820 feet and the water-only case of 500 feet. The approximate distance from the closest tree in the rookery to the nearest building footprint west of the rookery is 750 feet, or 100 feet greater than the distance recommended bY Vos et al. (1985). The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) within the U.S. Department of the rnterior has penurtimate reguratory authority over migratory birds, including great blue herons, in the United States. The basis for this authority derives from Migratory Bird Treaty Acts with canada (1918), Mexico (1936), Russia (1972), and Japan (1976)' The usFWS manages and protects migratory birds. overthe past 15-20 years the USFWS has developed habitat suitability index (HSI) models for fish, mammals, birds, reptiles' and amphibians. simply put, an HSI model develops a numerical value between 0 and 1 to indicate the value of a habitat for a particular species of wildlife. This would be analogous to the way that people rate restaurants on a scale from 0 (terrible) to 10 (outstanding). A value of 0 for the habitat model would indicate that the species could not possibly survive in the habitat whereas a value of 1 would indicate that the species I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ROSE RANCH DEVELOPMENT AND GREAT BLUE HERONS PAGE 1 1 should thrive in the habitat. Models are based on an extensive review of scientific literature and consultation with distinguished scientists and researchers having expertise on the species for which the model is developed. The USFWS developed an HSI model for the great blue heron in 1985 (Short and Cooper 1985). Sixty-nine previous scientific studies of great blue herons were reviewed prior to development of the model. The HSI model includes 6 variables: 1. Distance between potential nest sites and foraging (feeding) areas. 2. Presence of a water body with suitable prey populations and foraging substrate. A disturbance-free zone up to 330 feet around potential foraging areas. Presence of treeland cover types containing trees suitable for nesting within 820 feet of wetlands. 5. Presence of 820 foot (land) or 500 foot (water) disturbance-free zone around potential nest sites. 6. Proximity of potential nest site to an active nest. Each of the above suitability indices (variables) is assigned a number between 0 (extremely poor or deficient) and 1 (excellent or outstanding) and multiplication of suitability indices and the calculation of the square root of that product provides an estimate of the quality of treeland habitat near water as combined reproductive and foraging habitat for great blue herons: HSI = (V1 X V2 X V3 X V4 XVs X VO)1/2 where HSI = Habitat Suitability lndex, V = Variable l l I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ROSE RANCH DEVELOPMENT AND GREAT BLUE HERONS PAGE,I2 The disturbance-free zone variable assumes its highest value of 1.0 when the zone is 820 feet (land) or 500 feet (water) around heron nest sites. Because the Roaring Fork River separates the Rose Ranch development from the heron rookery, a logical disturbance-free zone would be intermediate between that for land (820 feet) and water (500 feet), or a distance of 660 feet. Because the nearest building footprint on the Rose Ranch will be approximately 750 feet from the nearest nesting tree in the rookery, the habitat suitability index would take on its highest value, or 1.0, indicating zero impact on nesting herons based solely on examination of this single variable. Carlson and Mclean (1996) evaluated buffer zones and disturbance types in relation to impacts on great blue herons. The researchers visited 19 great blue heron rookeries in 9 counties in Ohio and 2 counties in Pennsylvania from 1991-1993. Each heronry was visited 6-8 times throughout each of the 1991-1993 breeding seasons (mid-March to mid-July). Carlson and Mclean (1996:124) assessed the isolation of heronries from human disturbance in two ways and evaluated the extent of human intrusion: Buffer zone width was measured as the distance between perimeter nest trees and the nearest source of human foot-traffic (visible foot-paths, bike trails, roads). Barrier types were categorized as (0) none (foot-traffic evident within the heronry perimeter, (1) land (woods, fields), (2) land and water (pond or lake edge), (3) water (moat-like formation), and (4) fencing. The extent of human intrusion was evaluated during multiple visits to each site, and through interviews with local landowners, managers, and birders. lVe ranked heronry I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ROSE RANCH DEVELOPMENT AND GREAT BLUE HERONS PAGE 13 sites according to a subjective scaling of increasingly intrusive events: (1) no disturbance (no hikers, paths, footprints, trampled vegetation or litter), (2) mechanical disturbances (farm equipment, vehicle traffic, trains, low-flying aircraft), and (3) foot-traffic (hikers and horseback riders). Of the 19 colonies studied, the number of nests per colony was highly variable, ranging from 5-246. Rookeries isolated by fencing and "moat-like formations" produced higher numbers of young per nest per colony than those surrounded by land barriers or no buffer zone. Sites experiencing human foot traffic had fewer young per nest than sites with no disturbance or sites having mechanical disturbance. The authors cautioned that humans walking in close proximity to heron nest trees during the early part of the breeding season could impact heron nesting attempts. Their data suggested that higher numbers of young produced per nest were associated not with distance, but with effective barriers created by fencing and moat-like water formations that successfully limited foot-traffic. Carlson and Mclean (1996) suggested that small parcels of land could provide suitable colony sites given the existence of adequate buffer zones. Of 19 heron colonies studied by Carlson and McLean,T colonies had buffer zone widths less than the Rose Ranch buffer zone width (750 feet). Characteristics of these 7 colonies were: I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ROSE RANCH DEVELOPMENT AND GREAT BLUE HERONS PAGE 14 " 0 = no barrier (foot traffic evident within rookery) 1 = land (woods, fields) 2 = land and water (pond or lake edge) 3 = watei'(moat-likc fcrrnaticn) 4 = fencing b 1 = no disturbance (no hikers, paths, footprints, trampled vegetation or litter) 2 = mechanical disturbance (farm equipment, vehicle traffic, trains, aircraft) 3 = foot-traffic (hikers and horseback riders) Colony number 2 had no buffer zone and also had extremely low production of young (1.50 per nest). The barrier index at colonies 3 and 7 was comparable to the buffer zone for the proposed Rose Ranch development (land and water separating the rookery from development). Colony 3 had 54 active nests, produced an average of 2.21 young per nest, had a buffer zone of 328 feet, and had a moderate to high amount of disturbance 329 feet or more from the rookery. Of the 19 colonies studied, colony 7 had the highest number of active nests {246), had above-average production of young (2.30 per nest), had a 508 foot buffer zone, and had a moderate to high level of disturbance outside the buffer zone. This rookery was located close to an airport at Ashtabula, Ohio with all the attendant activities that occur at airports. Colony Number No. Active Nests No. Young Produced/Nest Buffer Zone Width (feet) Barrier lndex" Disturbance lndexb 1 38 2.06 410 1 2 2 26 1.50 0 0 3 3 54 2.21 328 2 2 4 101 2.45 492 3 1 5 81 2.22 131 3 2 6 39 2.50 246 4 2 7 246 2.30 508 2 2 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ROSE RANCH DEVELOPMENT AND GREAT BLUE HERONS PAGE 15 lnterestingly, the average number of young produced per nest (2.17)for rookeries having a buffer zone less than 750 feet was identical to the average number of young produced per nest (2.17) at rookeries having a buffer zone of 750-2,600 feet. An inference which can be made from Carlson and Mclean's (1976) study is that great blue herons can successfully nest and produce normal numbers of offspring under conditions where the distance of disturbance is less than that which would occur at the Rose Ranch. Carlson and McLean (1996:127) concluded: Human (foot traffic) clearly impacted heron nesting success in our study. Compared to disturbance from foot-traffic, herons demonstrated greater tolerance for routine or occasional mechanical disturbances, even when such events were accompanied by loud noise. Fledgling counts were similar between heronries experiencing no apparent disturbance and those having only mechanical disturbances. The repetitive nature of such disturbances, proximity to the heronry perimeter and their low frequency and amplitude may contribute to the herons' ability to habituate to them. Meyerriecks (1960:90,92) studied great blue herons extensively and intensively during the late 1950s in Florida and offered the following observations about disturbance and habituation: When fully aware of the approach of humans, herons usually respond with an unhurried flight; such leisurely flights are usually silent. On occasion, however, a low, rather harsh "frahnk" or "frawnk" call may be uttered as the bird takes wing. When suddenly startled by a human, herons explode into ilight, usually I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ROSE RANCH DEVELOPMENT AND GREAT BLUE HERONS PAGE 16 giving or ore more "frawnk" calls. These large herons vary a great deal in their responses to the close approach of a human to the nest. The incubating or brooding bird, if well aware of the intruder's presence, rises from the nest and stands in one of the alert postures described later. lf suddenly surprised on the nest, however, these birds flush directly, and their subsequent behavior is highly variable. Some individuals land near the nest and keep the intruder in sight at all times, while others leave the area and circle about the nest site, sometimes landing hundreds of yards away. Others may fly back and forth over the nest, and each time they spot the intruder they fly rapidly away again. The Florida Bay populations of herons were habituated to the roar of the numerous outboard motors, and other boat noises so common in this region, especially along the well-traveled intracoastal waterway. Away from the main boat lanes, however, these birds were very wary, and they usually responded to the sudden noise of a boat motor starting by showing an extreme alert posture or by flushing wildly. Habituation to the click of a camera was quite rapid with one pair of herons nesting on Cotton Key. When the first migratory herons arrived on Rulers Bar Hassock in 1957, the birds which fed near the railroad tracks flushed wildly at the approach of the trains, but habituation was rapid. Later it was a common sight to see these and numerous smaller herons feeding within a few feet of the speeding trains. ln addition to the study conducted by Vos et al. (1985) in north-central Colorado and described earlier, another example from Colorado comes from the Denver area. Chatfield State Park is located in Jefferson County on the southwestern outskirts of I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ROSE RANCH DEVELOPMENT AND GREAT BLUE HERONS PAGE 17 Denver. Approximately 1.5 million people visit the park annually. Prior to construction of the Chatfield Dam in 1973, there were more than 200 nests in the cottonwood tress that grew along the north bank of the South Platte River (Larson 1995). Once the reservoir was filled, however, nesting trees were subjected to erosion which led to decline of the trees. By 1988, most of the trees had fallen down and the number of birds using the colony had decreased substantially. ln February 1990, wildlife managers placed nesting platforms and heron decoys in a stand of cottonwood trees 1,000 - 1,300 feet south of the old nesting site. ln 1991, herons began to usethe new site. During the 1992 breeding season, the new colony consisted of g7 active great blue heron nests. To encourage park visitors to observe herons in the park, in 1992 the Colorado Division of Wildlife (DOW) and the Division of Parks and Outdoor Recreation (DOPR) initiated the development of a Wildlife Viewing Area (\ffVA, Larson 1995). A drawing of the plan is attached. A viewing deck was constructed approximately 250 feet from the heron rookery and a viewing shelter was constructed approximately 500 feet from the heron colony. There is apparently no limit to the number of visitors (1.5 million annually) who may use these viewing areas. Because of heron courtship, nest- building, breeding, egg-laying, and incubation, the viewing deck is closed from March 1- May 1. However, the viewing shelter is open to park visitors year-round. The DOW and DPOR constructed a year-round viewing shelter at a distance of approximately 500 feet from a large, very important great blue heron rookery. Significant planning and consultation with wildlife managers, researchers, and scientists occurred prior to plan implementation. The buffer zone distance of 5C0 feet is 250 feet I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ROSE RANCH DEVELOPMENT AND GREAT BLUE HERONS PAGE 18 less than the land/water buffer zone which will separate the heron rookery on the east bank of the Roaring Fork River from the closest homesites on the Rose Ranch PUD. I talked by telephone with a Chatfield State Park ranger on April 3 to learn the status of nesting herons. The ranger reported that the herons had relocated their nesting colony to a location 1 mile south beginning in 1996. She stated that a DOW study (which I have not seen) implicated a number of factors, including eagle predation, on the relocation and that the relocation could not be attributed to single particular factor. There is varying information in the scientific literature regarding desirable buffer zones for great blue herons while they are nesting. Butler (1993b) recommends a buffer of 1 ,000 feet. Simpson and Kelsall (1979) studied herons at two locations in British Columbia in 1978. One location was close to a housing development (Pender Harbor colony) under construction (distance not reported). Nest occupancy at this rookery was significantly lower than at a comparison rookery not located near a housing development. However, eagle predation may have been responsible for the difference in percentage of nests occupied. Simpson and Kelsall (1987) reported that in 1979, when human disturbance at the Pender Harbor colony was not important (the housing development was abandoned), the number of nest failures was nearly the same as during housing development. Herons abandoned the Pender Harbor colony in 1980 because of several years of eagle predation on adult and young herons. Vos et al. (1985) and Short and Cooper (1985) recommended a land buffer of 820 feet and a water buffer of 500 feet (and, by inference, a land/water buffer of 660 feet). Burger and Gochfeld (1981) concluded that herons should habituate to human activity if the herons are able to distinguish whether the human intrusion presents an I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ROSE RANCH DEVELOPMENT AND GREAT BLUE HERONS PAGE 19 actual threat to them. Taylor et al. (1982) found that despite the closeness of human activities (575 feet), great blue herons at a colony in lndiana had excellent reproduction. The birds appeared habituated to repetitive activities that posed no threat to them. Webb and Forbes (1982) were optimistic about the continuation of a heron colony in a high human activity area where herons had become conditioned to human activity. Erwin (1989) noted that colonies of wading birds did not respond to human intrusion at distances greater than 500 feet. Graul (1981) reported that human activities beyond 330 feet seldom disturbed great blue herons and Vos et al. (1985) determined that two- thirds of herons studied in north-central Colorado did not flush from their nests as a result of human intrusions. Erwin (1989) suggested that habituation (previous exposure to human activity) is a major factor in determining heron flushing distances. Research on great blue herons has demonstrated that nesting herons may become habituated to noise, traffic, human activity, logging, urbanization, and other factors (Anderson 1978, Butler 1991, Grubb 1979, Kelsall and Simpson 1980, Parker 1980, Vos 1984). Butler (1991 ) reported that some great blue herons in British Columbia have become habituated to non-threatening activities. As an example, in 1974 herons from Brockton Point (Vancouver) moved to tall trees within the former Stanley Park Zoo and near the entrance to the Vancouver Aquarium (Butler 1996). Despite a close proximity to large masses of people, the herons have successfully nested each year since 1974. The rookery is the most viewed heron rookery in Canada. Butler (1991 ) reported that a colony became established beside an industrial park and near a large hotel in Vancouver. One pair of herons raised young in a nest in a tree along a suburban street in Vancouver. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ROSE RANCH DEVELOPMENT AND GREAT BLUE HERONS PAGE 20 There is currently an occupied home on the west bank of the Roaring Fork River immediately south of the proposed fishing park. The home is 440 feet from the closest nesting tree in the heron rookery located across the river. I do not know how long the house has been present on this site but I am assuming it has been there for at least several years. The presence of this dwelling and associated human activity apparently did not impact heron nesting efforts last year as 10 of 12 nests were successful in producing young. On April 6, 1998, at 4:00 p.m., I observed 5 herons incubating eggs on nests across the river while I was standing along the river near the home referred to in this paragraph. Three children were bouncing on a trampoline between the home and the river and talking to each other. The incubating and resting herons across the river were not visibly disturbed by my presence or the presence of the children. Werschkul et al (1976) determined that heron nest sites within 485 feet of a logging operation were inactive, while nests 720 feetfrom the logging were active. lnventories of 55 heron and egret breeding colonies in the San Francisco Bay area in 1991 revealed that human residences were found within 1 ,600 feet of 56% of the colony sites (Kelly et al. 1993). Although some heron colonies in North America have been in existence for over 60 years, the average lifespan of a heron colony is 9 years. Heron abandonment of rookeries has been attributed to many factors, including a changing distribution of food resources, natural and heron-caused demise of nesting trees (heron excrement can affect soil pH, can affect transpirational cooling, and can cause foliage osmotic burning), depletion of nesting material, tree cutting, wetland drainage, water recreation, highway construction, logging and predation (Bjorkland 1975, Julin 1986, Kerns and I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ROSE RANCH DEVELOPMENT AND GREAT BLUE HERONS PAGE 21 Howe 1967, Konermann et al. 1978, Ryder et al. 1980, Wiese 1978). The scientific literature on great blue herons is replete with instances where predators have caused partial or total abandonment of heron nesting colonies (Butler 1986, 1995, Burkholder and smith 1988, Foss 1980, Hjertas 1982, Kelly 1990, Kelsall and simpson 1980, Koonz 1980, Lopinot 1952, McAloney 1973, Norman et al. 1989, Quinney 1983, Simpson 1g84). Several first-hand accounts in the literature relate how bald eagles have attacked adult and juvenile great blue herons while the herons are in flight. It is likely that those great blue herons nesting in the Roaring Fork Valley which migrate south in the winter return to the Roaring Fork Valley to nest. An unknown percentage of herons in the valley are year-round residents. As human populations and attendant commercial and residential developments expand in the valley, habituation of nesting and foraging great blue herons should increase (tolerance distances should decrease). I personally do not like to see habituation in wildlife but it is a byproduct of the relationship between both man and wildlife when both occupy the same general habitat. Findinq I reviewed approximately 50 scientific articles on great blue heron natural history, biology, and ecology prior to preparation of this report. A number of studies provided factual information which would lead to the inference that the Rose Ranch PUD would not negatively impact great blue herons nesting across the Roaring Fork River from the pUD. Graul (1981), in a study in north-central Colorado, reported that a majority of uncontrolled human intrusions within 330 feet of heron rookeries did not result in herons I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ROSE RANCH DEVELOPMENT AND GREAT BLUE HERONS PAGE22 flushing from their nests. Vos et al. (1985) reported that beyond 460 feet, experimental intrusions (people walking on foot, people riding motorcycles, a tractor being operated near a rookery, and a motorized boat passing the rookery) did not cause herons to flush from nests. Based on findings by Vos et all. (1985) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Cooper and Short 1985), the nearest homesite on the Rose Ranch PUD would be outside the recommended buffer zone width for land/water. Carlson and Mclean (1996) studied 7 heron colonies (total of 485 nests) which were active, productive, and had buffer zone widths less than that which would occur at the Rose Ranch. Particularly compelling was a colony the researchers studied which was approximately 500 feet from an airport. This colony had the highest number of active nests QaO) of the 19 colonies evaluated, had above average production of young, and had a moderate to high level of human disturbance outside the buffer zone. The Chatfield State Park wildlife viewing deck and viewing shelter were constructed at distances of approximately 250 and 500 feet, respectively, from a large, important great blue heron nesting area. Significant planning and consultation with wildlife managers, researchers, and scientists occurred prior to construction. A number of studies reported that herons are not visibly disturbed by human activities occurring beyond the buffer zone width which would exist at the Rose Ranch, and other studies have referred to the ability of herons to habituate to human activities (Anderson 1978, Burger and Gochfeld 1981 , Butler 1991, 1996, Erwin 1989, Grubb 1979, Horvath and Moholt 1986, Kelsall and Simpson 1980, Kushlan 1979, Meyerriecks 1960, Parker'1980, Parsons '1995, Sullivan and Payne 1988, Taylor et al. 1982, Web and Forbes 1982, Werschkul 1976). I discussed the proposed PUD with Dr. Lyle Nauman, Professor Emeritus of Wildlife I I I I I I t I I I I I I I I I I I T ROSE RANCH DEVELOPMENT AND GREAT BLUE HERONS PAGE 23 Management at the University of Wisconsin, who is a former colleague. Dr. Nauman and his former graduate studies studied great blue heron nesting ecology over many years. Dr. Nauman's opinion was that the development would not harm nesting herons on the 6 acre site, but avian and terrestrial predators might pose a threat to the nesting herons. I carefully reviewed material written by Robert Butler. Dr. Butler wrote his doctoral dissertation on the great blue heron and has extensive field experience with herons. As can be seen in the Literature Cited section of this report, I have cited more works by Butler than by other scientists and researchers. Butler (1991 , 1993b, 1996) recommends a buffer zone of 1,000 feet around heron nesting colonies from February to late August. However, as discussed earlier, I could not find evidence from Butle/s studies which would logically support such a recommendation. ln addition, my review of the scientific literature did not identify a situation where great blue herons had abandoned a nesting colony under land and water spatial arrangements, and human activity factors, which occur and would occur, respectively, on the Rose Ranch PUD. The Roaring Fork River was a very important component in developing my findings. The river represents an important physical and probably a psychological barrier to human intrusion on nesting great blue herons. Wildlife are more secure when they are separated by a body of water from a potential threat, whether the threat is a human or a predator. lt is also important to note that the sound of flowing water in the Roaring Fork River dampens/reduces sounds originating across the river from the heron rookery addressed in this report. I I I I I I I I T I I I I I I I I I t ROSE RANCH DEVELOPMENT AND GREAT BLUE HERONS PAGE 24 I am confident in the finding I have reached, but this finding would need to be carefully re-evaluated under conditions where a river or other significant body of water did not separate human activity from nesting great blue herons. Finding Based on my personal obseruations of the site, my review of the scientific Iiterature, my knowledge and experience with respect to great blue herons and other wildlife species, and my discussions with individuals having expeftise on great blue heron nesting ecology, I conclude that development of the Rose Ranch as planned, including non'use of the former ftoater's park and fishing park, will not negatively impact great blue herons nesting on the 6 acre area located along the east shore of the Roaring Fork River. Recommendations to benefit great blue herons Following are recommendations which, if implemented, will benefit great blue herons. The reader may wonder why I am making these recommendations in light of my finding of non-impact. RFI has emphasized to me the importance of wildlife to future occupants of the Rose Ranch development and has expressed its desire to be a wildlife steward. The following recommendations are aligned with this directive and philosophy. 1. lnstall a deer and beaver-proof fence around the heron rookery. The fence will preclude beavers from cutting down nest trees and potential nest trees, will eliminate deer browsing on regenerating cottonwood seedlings and saplings, thus allowing for their groMh, will deter raccoons from preying on heron eggs, and will deter people from entering the area. 2. Attach signs to the fence in conspicuous locations which indicate that the area is a heron refuge and entry is prohibited ("HERON NESTING AREA -- ENTRY lS I I I T I I I I I I I I I t I I I I I 3. 4. ROSE RANCH DEVELOPMENT AND GREAT BLUE HERONS PAGE 25 PROHIBITED"). lnstall an B-10 foot tall temporary fence along the east lot lines of lots 114'118 and keep the fence in place from February 1 to May 1 to obscure or eliminate heron viewing of human activity in this area. Plant rapidly growing deciduous trees (e.g. Populus spp., Sa/x spp.) near the eastern lot lines of lots 114-118 where needed to obscure human activity from the view of herons and to dampen noise. ln some cases cedar and cottonwood trees already present in this area will obscure human activity. However, vegetative gaps need to be filled in. 5. A provision should be in place which would result in the Rose Ranch Homeowners Association (HOA) constructing or arranging for the construction of artificial nesting platforms on wooden poles in the existing rookery if a shortage of nest trees occurs following the natural demise of trees (see Meier 1981, Sandilands 1e80). O. I recommend that the HOA set aside funds for the construction and placement of heron nesting platforms in cottonwood trees (live or dead) located in the riparian zone along the Roaring Fork River to the north and south of the current rookery. These platforms will provide an increased number of attractive nesting sites and will benefit nesting great blue herons in the Roaring Fork Valley. 7. On an annual basis, prior to heron nest building and nest reconstruction, put out piles of cut tree branches near and in the rookery to facilitate nest-building. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ROSE RANCH DEVELOPMENT AND GREAT BLUE HERONS PAGE 26 LTTERATURE CITED Anderson, J. M. 1978. Protection and management of wading birds. Aud. Soc. Res. ReP. 7:99-103. Bjorkland, R. G. 1975. On the death of a midwestern heronry. Wilson Bull' 87:284-287. Burger, J. and M. Gochfeld. 1981 . Discrimination of direct versus tangential approach to the nest by incubating herring and great black-backed gulls. J. Comp. Physiol. Psych. 95:676-684. Buler, R. W. 1989. Breeding ecology and population trends of the great blue heron (Ardea herodias) ins the Strait of Georgia. Pages 112-117 in K. Vermeer and R. W. Buger, eds. The ecology and status of marine and shoreline birds in the Strait of Georgia, British Columbia. Canad. Wildl. Serv. Spec. Pub' . 1991 . A review of the biology and conservation of the great blue heron (Ardea herodias) in British Columbia. Canadian Wildl. Serv. Tech. Rep. No. 154. 17pp. . 1g93a. Time of breeding in relation to food availability of female great blue herons (Ardea herodias). Auk 110:693-701.. 1993b. Great blue heron. Pages 1-19 in A. Poole, P. Stettenheim, and F. Gill (eds.). The birds of North America. No. 25. Academy of Sciences, Philadelphia and American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, D. C. I ROSE RANCH DEVELOPMENTAND GREAT BLUE HERONS PAGE27 I I . 1995. The patient predator: foraging and population ecology of the great T I blue heron (Ardea herodias) in British Columbia. Can. Wildl. Serv' Occas. Pap. I No.86. 44pp. I 1996. The great blue heron: natural history and ecology of a seashoreI r,,,nni:.::::,:: :::x'::::"'",'*,:::i,"';'::,,n n anus,nes, ns n a great blue heron (Ardea herodias) heronry. J' Raptor Res. 22:62. and 1991 . Nest trees and productivity of great blue herons (Ardea herodias) at Knox Lake, north-central Ohio. Colonial Waterbirds I M:G1-62. I Carlson, B. A. and E. B. McLean. 1996. Bufferzones and disturbance types as I predictors of fledging success in great blue herons, Ardea herodias. Colonial Waterbirds 19:1 24-197. I Dowd, E. M. and L. D. Flake. 1985. Foraging habitats and movements of nesting great I blue herons in a prairie river ecosystem, South Dakota. J. Field. Ornithol. 56:379-387. I English, S. M. 1978. Distribution and ecology of great blue heron colonies on the I Willamette River, oregon. Natl. Aud. Soc. Res. Rep. 7:235-244. r Enruin, R. M. 1989. Responses to human intruders by birds nesting in colonies:t experimental results and management guidelines. Colonial Waterbirds I 22:io4-108. I I I R.SE RAN.H DEVEL.PMENTAND GREAT BLUE HERONS PAGE 28 I Forbes, L. S. 1987. Feeding behaviour of great blue herons at Creston, British I Columbia. Can. J. ZooL 65:3062-3067. Foss, E. 1980. A black bear in a great blue heron colony. Murrelet 61:113. I Gibbs, J. P. 1991 . Spatial relationships between nesting colonies and foraging areas I of great blue herons. Auk 108:764-770. I , S. Woodward, M. L. Hunter, and A. E. Hutchinson. 1988. Comparison of techniques for censusing great blue heron nests. J. Field. Ornithol. 59:130-134. I Graul, W. D. 1981 . Population surveys of selected bird and mammal species in I Colorado., Part l. Job Program Report, Wildlife Resource Report. Colorado Division of Wildlife, Denver, CO. I Grubb, M. M. 1g7g. Effects of increased noise levels on nesting herons and egrets. I Proc. 1978 Conf. Colonial Waterbird Group 2:49-54. r Hiertas, D. G. 1982. Great blue herons and raccoons at Nicolle Flats. Blue JayI 40:3641. I Horvath, E. G. 1986. Diurnal feeding cycle at an inland great blue heron colony. I Murrelet 67:27-28. Julin, K. R. 1986. Decline of second-grov,rth douglas-fir in relation to great blue heron t nesting. Northwest Sci. 60:201-205. I Kelly, J. P. 1990. 1990 inventory of heron and egret breeding colonies in Marin, I Sonoma, Napa, and Solano Counties, California. ACR Project Report 90-3-1. Audubon Canyon Ranch, Stinson Beach, CA. t I I I I ROSE RANCH DEVELOPMENTAND GREAT BLUE HERONS I PAGE 29 I , H. M. Pratt, and P. L. Greene. 1993. Thedistribution, reproductiveI success, and habitat characteristics of heron and egret breeding colonies in the I San Francisco Bay area. Colonial Waterbirds 16: 18-27 . t Kelsall, J. P. and K. Simpson. 1980. A three year study of great blue herons in southwestern British Columbia. Proc. 1979 Conf. Colonial Waterbird Group 3:69-74. I Kerns, J. M. and J. F. Howe. 1967. Factors determining great blue heron rookery I movement. J. Minn. Acad. Sci. 34:80-83. Konerman, A. D., L. D. Wing, and J. J. Richard. 1978. Great blue heron nesting I success in two lowa reservoir ecosystems. Natl. Aud. Soc. Res. Rep. I 7rfi-12e. I Koonz, W. H. 1980. Bald eagle nest in a Manitoba heronry. Blue Jay 38:47 . Kushlan, J. A. 1979. Effects of helicopter censuses of wading bird colonies. J. Wildl. t Manage. 43:756-760. I Larson, R. 1995. Balancing wildlife viewing with wildlife impacts: a case study. Pages 257-270in R. L. Knight and K. J. Gutzwiller, eds. Wildlife and recreationists: I coexistence through management and research. lsland Press, Washington, I Dc I Lopinot, A. C. 1952. Raccoon predation on great blue herons. Auk 68:235. I- McAloney, K. 1973. The breeding biology of the great blue heron on Tobacco lsland, I Nova Scotia. Can. Field Natural. 87:137-140. t I I ROSE RANCH DEVELOPMENTAND GREATBLUE HERONS I PAGE 30 I Mehner, J. F. 1g51. Turkey vultures attacking great blue herons. Wilson Bull- 64:242- Meier, T. l. 1gg1. Artificial nesting structures forthe double-crested cormorant. Wis. I Dept. Nat. Resour. Tech. Bull. 126. 13pp. I Meyerriecks, A. J. 1960. Comparative breeding behavior of four species of North t American herons. Nuttall Ornithological Club, Cambridge, MA. 158pp' Norman, D. M., A. M. Breault, and l. E. Moul. 1989. Bald eagle incursions and I predation at great blue heron colonies. Colonial Waterbird s 12:143-147. I parker, J. 1g80. Great blue herons (Ardea herodias) in northwestern Montana: nesting habitat use and the effects of human disturbance. M.S. Thesis, University of I Montana, Missoula. I parsons, K. C. 1995. Heron nesting at Pea Patch lsland, Upper Delaware Bay, USA: I abundance and reproductive success. Colonial Waterbirds 18:69-78. euinney, T. E. 1982. Growth, diet, and mortality of nestling great blue herons. Wilson I Bult. e4:s r1-s77. I Ryder, R. A., W. D. Graul, and G. C. Miller. 1980. Status, distribution, and movement of Ciconiiforms in Colorado. Proc. 1979 Conf. Colonial Waterbird Group I 3:4e-s7. I Sandilands, A. P. 1980. Artificial nest structures for great blue herons. Blue Jay I 38:187-188. r Short, H. L. and R. J. Cooper. 1985. Habitat suitability index models: great blue heron. I USDI U. S. Fish & wildl. Serv. Bio. Rep. 82 (10.99) . 24pp' I I I ROSE R.ANCH DEVELOPMENTAND GREAT BLUE HERONS PAGE 31 t Simpson, K. 1984. Factors affecting reproduction in great blue herons (Ardea t herodias). M.S. Thesis, Univ. Brit. Columbia, Vancouver. I ;ilI,:Ji,;-1";^:::: ,';: ffi::"c'nsequences'r I Sullivan, J. P. and S. M. Payne. 1988. Aspects of history and nestling mortality at a I great blue heron, Ardea herodias, colony, Quetico Provincial Park, Ontario. Can. Field Natural. 102:237-241. t Taylor, R. M., M. M. Reshkin, and K. J. Brock. 1982. Recreation land use adjacent to I an active heron rookery: a management study. Proc. lndiana Acad. Sci. I ,or, onl'',L11t-"sponse of breeding sreat btue herons to human disturbance in I northcentrat Colorado. M.S. Thesis, Colorado, State University, Fort Collins. I 65PP'r ;",:.:::::.*[]# J::.::::::,:'::,::ffi"]:, I 8:13-22 I Webb, R. S. and L. S. Forbes. 1982. Colony establishment in an urban site by great blue herons. Murrelet 63:91-92. I Wiese, J. H. 1978. Heron nest site selection and its ecological effects. Natl. Aud. Soc. I Res. ReP.7:27-34. I I I t I I I I I I I I I t T I I I I I I I Fig. 1. Chatfield State Park Wildlife Viewing Area. 6- -/. -.- f'. rct -.-./: . iO '-i* f ,'f i, .":Q.+-'1r'r 11.:6 - E ",tE :..r :e=:;i-e',',./,-.W i, i, {tiijiij_g 'iffi'l[i,li,#flf z''*.i.i.:iiY e,' :),Wil__ ?$il/tr\ \ 6 :.6-.*4: _, \ o $iW--'\ g t..'t,.|'i It*/C .-- |*frli! / .,' ffi(i+*i{i+id\ i *,-q,+i{i ;{-lt-l- I i #r s iitu i <l I a9 ,,itL- i 5 - '...1 (\ ='-{Ii, '',U,. \ 3 _"_,)s\ *a-9 ^C,.\.t'CL)";'llr '-'-i\ 'l .'/ ) ,).1to (i\/l t), ,j r: J 't' l l ' ;l') .ii'(. '..- +-- -n --f 6-rn .\_-.1 j .t r =. . l l ::. :::,,',: U' - l::'i r'\" :.t'' i,')1. --,:i.r':1i.1, ,, 1'*> "Jr"- -4.. . tt.: >{*,,it,-'':V: "r. ;.:; {1:.._,,/lrl ,. :. ''11:.'l ') . . Jl:l: /.' ::'1.::z ' '. .: .'11'"/-:: i),/:,k-6:i 'Zli:.-,<L-*r.lilt=t: ,f+ii'H1., ,;+;il/ trt : t LJ i, -'.li i. 5J.l;')#iiil6.:= afrHt''i:1 3Fm #,& $il.-KtrH 'l' )* 'IF 9 dt..or{ = J_. = (o\> .cl OEl o--lr l* :'\-\' r :di llsi =is\ii$:-H= )lii i; i*iq$:l it;, i g =g , +*- Lli lr ,,i ,i, ,,=i "'r'$'i ' ' ifdi ,l :, 1 '' '\ff. ,1 [],,i' 'I .,,' ,,ffi "J[.l ['. .\ /;' ,l |:, i'",,fi'-''-t "'fi'''i;P-' :'':/: 'j lt'},i L', ,, , .,'fi;;,.,:;,.y' , l:; .' iffi/'' ,/i -ii'' , "'i'ffi' 1 ,/, ., -u: , *4*#?i CIIATFIELD STATE PARK WILDLIFE VIEWING-]\REA r''+ ----,-*.r, ..,.*, rdGtr HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC. T 517 BLAKE AVE., SUITE I O I GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 8 T 60 I TELEPHoNE (97o) 94sa676 u FAx (97O) 94s2555 JUN 1 5 ?nn5 We are sending the following: [l Photocopies ffi rrints DATE:June 15 SUBJECT: Ironbridge Traffic report JOB NO.2051019.00 ffi Documents f] Ivtytars ! Strop Drawings Garfield County 108 8th Street, suiteH Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 ATTN: Mark Bean I ottret NO. OF COPIES ITEM LATEST ITEM DATED REMARIG I Traffic study Please notify us at once if the material received is not listed above. Transmitted by: ,) L_l First Class Mdil n u.s.Express ilIIil fIUPS Next Day Air flMessengerflp*I otne, ! Priority Iraail ! Federal Express fl rictup X Uana Delivered By: Scoft Greeorv I I I I I I I I I I I t t I t I I I t ROSE RANCH, PUD PRELIMINARY TRAFFIC STUDY INTRODUCTION This traffic study for the Rose Ranch addresses the capacity, geometric, and traffic control requirements associated with a proposed residential development and 18 hole golf course located South of Highway 82 and East of CR 109 in Garfield County, Colorado. Please reference Figure 1 for the vicinity map. EXISTING AND PROPOSED LAND USES The site is currently vacant and is being used for agricultural uses. The developer is proposing developing the site into a residential community with an l8 hole public golf course. please see Figure 2 for a site plan. SITE ACCESS Access is proposed from CR 109. The development also proposes three access points onto CR I 09. Please see Figur e 2 for Iocations of said access points. CR I 09 currently intersects CR I 54just North of the bridge over the Roaring Fork River. CR 154 intersects State Highway g2 approximately Yz mie to the Northwest of the CR 109 intersection. It is anticipated that this intersection will be the primary access onto Hwy 82 for North bound traffic. iR tS+ utro intersects Hwy 82 approximately t mile to the South of the CRl09/CRl54 intersection. It is expected that this will be the primary access for South bound traffic. SURROUNDING LAND USES The surrounding land uses are as follows. The Roaring Fork River borders the project along the entire East boundary, the approximately half of the property on the opposite bank of the river is currently undeveloped and being used for ranching. The other half of the frontage is currently single family residents. The project is bordered by CR 109 along the north halfif the West boundary in this area. The Westbank single family subdivision borders CR 109. The property is bordered by undeveloped land along the remaining western border. The property is bordered by land zoned AARD along the northern border. This land currently has thrle (3) homes on it. The southern border is shared with the Teller Springs single family subdivision. t1 '&:.!/' ( '; '.ll-;:i-..\fr , ""-"-'i-.;Natig\..*" rl /r' ) t-ail J; t1 i \ia'\; I;d Mine ;'iit:f.lL x'/^-+ -/*.- ".-\ f'. %r -\ q, t- -oo, I , I i | | '\-)u1\t.t€.'J\ -'-*-, 1 ' }*iffiryj 'i "*;-i.., i'""P;=', ,-d,---*" \ 1 ' ^oV.' (- r-a&{il-*'''l Y*%-*-"i $:.1a\) K:,',,-4 .r'1 /'' | ,i' {' i' ,!;;i'-l;'f i -rdii=9I /t 'fiEe hJ. .:i.rl ,-\IVI i. it\t. \' =i4fNElJ;-"i (,_ Od'r-.L.&s.r;* ''' t SiksPjth*, *..',' .t : i 'iit[Hffi 'il f -?t :\ ..JP:,^.-:-*\, !*,-'-**--. \*@a * **x.;\-"i;-/'/ :s\--- z .oj -ffisti ''., i), (;:t\iW, i\-ffi il';=: j- lo*\\R "r."^ \' \'-rr\ It&. ,1" \\ oz- \'etli/ - *-:.-'-,.' t-t,:l t I \ o- -'\, r1 i l*5 I I I lr lr lr lr li lr Fr.auxt L I t I T I I I I I TRIP GENERATION Trip generation was estimated using the Trip Generation Manual. 5th Edition. Table I shows the daily and peak hour trip generation for this development. A trip is defined as a one way vehicle movement from the origin to destination. The origin or destination of a generated trip would be within the site area. For the purpose of this study, the data in Table t has been grouped into traffic generating areas for each proposed intersection with CR 109. The traffic generating areas were based upon approximate vehicular movements within the project. TRIP GENERAT]ON TGA TOTAL LOTS GOLF TRIPS DAILY TRIPS AM PEAK TRIPS TRIPS IN OUT PM PEAK TRIPS TRIPS IN OUTt I I I t I t I I I ENT 1 ENT 2 ENT 3 TOTAL 167 74 51 292 764 33 83 10 126 111 78 34 223 60 101 1B 179 1 593 1469 487 94 57 29 1803549 Table I I I I I lr lr lr lr lr lr l: lr lr I TRIP DISTRIBUTION The overall directional distribution of the site generated traffic was based upon the existing travel patterns in the area and in consideration of trip attractions and productions in this area. Traffic distribution was based upon traffic counts taken on CR 109 and CR 154 in April and May of this year. The counts taken on CRl09 intersection with the Westbank entrances indicate an approximate 97% North 3% South. This distribution was applied to all three proposed intersections with CR 109. The distribution for the CR-109/CR-154 intersection was found to be 75% West 25% East. The distribution for the CR-154/Hwy 82 intersection was found tobe 98% North 2% South. TRAFFIC VOLLMES AND TRIP ASSIGNMENT Twenty-four hour traffic counts with AM and PM peaks were taken on CR 109 and CR154. Count data is provided in Appendix A. The traffic data is displayed graphically in Figures 3- 12. Figures 13 and 16 show the level of service analysis results using the 1997 twenty-four hour traffic counts, AM and PM peaks for the CR-109/CR-154 intersection and the CR-154/Hwy- 82 intersection. The analysis was performed using the "Highway Capacity Software" which is based on the equations and data contained within the "Highway Capacity Manual". Printouts of the software analysis results are provided in the Appendix B. The CR-109 / CR-154 intersection is currently operating at LOS A and will continue to operate at an acceptable LOS A in all directions except westbound left nrrning movements which will operate at LOS B. However, the existing CR-154 / Hwy 82 intersection is currently operating at LOS F. With the addition of the Rose Ranch traffic the intersection continues to operate well below acceptable standards. At the request of CDOT the intersection was modeled with left turn decel, right turn decel and left and right accel lanes to see if this would improve the intersection. Please see Figure 17 for the proposed layout. These improvements did not affect the LOS. Consequently the intersection would still be operating well below acceptable levels. During an onsite visit with Jim Nall, Rich Orton and Dale French of CDOT several alternatives for improving the safety and functionality of the intersection were discussed. [t is my opinion that the only viable solution for the intersection would be to signalize the intersection. Mr. Nall has indicated that if the intersection is subjected to a signal warrant analysis he will consider the placement of a signal. It should be noted that this intersection is currently operating in an unsafe manner. Testimony to this fact can be qualified by observing the many skidmarks on the pavement surface. Also, my technician counting traffic at the intersection was involved in an accident while trying to turn left onto Hwy 82. Subsequently, CDOT has approved the access permit for the CR 154 / Hwy 82 intersection as proposed in this study (Figure 18). CDOT is currently considering the applicant request to construct the signal at the intersection immediately upon approval of the project by Garfield County. IIITIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 'Tl oCf,]rn(, dL r+92 ts * (oo)!NNazoocfl -.t -{-- Ia * (o!o)NNzaoorrc-{ -..|TT ID II]ooCCzzoo :8s I t ,!o',.) Goe(o t,ll f, afi-ll ;a 'Tr -{8* 'Tt o * EffifrEog:l li,= =uB9 rno m rn>1 =i-uL xn IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII tloCf,m o 33+ (46) 1082+\zz <t- (46) cR 109 6-.8L+146 Q4 I>/-+ 55 Go5(o nllrnX _=au4 rn 63- lffi; a t8 T; to6h'n o * =wuuaH EU9 fri=? =e#2 rno m Ia * (o \J G)NNzaoofrc-{ -lI- ID II]ooCCzzoo tq {t (oo)!NN crz.oocfl -t-JI- rn>1 =-nD xnN mz ll zom l\) t I I I I I I I I t I I I I I t I I I o)o (to (oa =5 + o) @^9N + t 85 @ C\I + \ \ ENTHANCE 3 A.M. PEAK ENTRANCE 3 29+r * 97% NORTH 3Z SOUTH (t t s5 10 {> *, 937" SOUTHBOUND 7Z NORTHBOUND LEGEND 59 = ROSE RANCH TRAFFIC (24) = EXISTING TRAFFIC * DIHECTIONAL DISTANCE BASED UPON WESTBANK ENTRANCE FIGURE 7 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I t I I I I o)I ttro E8 + r)o rra sv + t o= =s? @ro \ ENTRANCE 1 P.M. PEAK ENTRANCE 1 60<r * 97% NORTH 3Z SOUTH 111 {> * 937" SOUTHBOUND 7Z NORTHBOUND @ t $ast5 LEGEND 59 = ROSE RANCH TRAFFIC (24) = EXISTING TRAFFIC * DIRECTIONAL DISTANCE BASED UPON WESTBANK ENTRANCE FIGURE 10 o)o (Eo E8 + (DN Eg + t (D=Ng @o, t \ ENTRANCE 2 P.M. PEAK ENTRANCE 2 101+* 97:l NORTH 3Z SOUTH ( t PB 78 -|> * 93:l SOUTHBOUND 7Z NORTHBOUND LEGEND 59 = ROSE RANCH TRAFFIC (24) = EXISTING TRAFFIC * DIHECTIONAL DISTANCE BASED UPON WESTBANK ENTHANCE FIGURE 11 I I I I t I I I I I I I t I t I t t t o)o (ro RE + (9 SE + t (Da ES tr I \ ENTRANCE 3 P.M. PEAK ENTRANCE 3 18+* 972 NORTH 3Z SOUTH 34+* 93:l SOUTHBOUND 7Z NORTHBOUND c.) t (9aN5 LEGEND 59 = ROSE RANCH TRAFFIC (24) = EXISTING THAFFIC * DIRECTIONAL DISTANCE BASED UPON WESTBANK ENTRANCE FIGURE 12 I I I I I I I t I I I I I I I I I I t Acceptable operation is defined as level of service D or better. Level of Service classifications are defined as follows. Level of Service A - describes primarily free flow operation at average travel speeds usually about 90 percent of the free flow average speed. Vehicles are completely unimpeded in their ability to maneuver within the trafiic stream. Stopped delay at intersection is minimal. Level of Service B - represents reasonably unimpeded operations at average travel speeds usually about 70 percent of the free flow speed. The ability to maneuver within the traffic stream is only slightly restricted and stopped delays are not bothersome. Drivers are not generally subjected to appreciable tension. Level of Service C - represents stable operations. However, ability to maneuver and change lanes in mid block locations may be more restricted than in LOS B, and longer queues and/or adverse signal coordination may contribute to lower average travel speeds of about 50 percent of the average free flow speed. Motorists will experience an appreciable tension while driving. Level of Service D - borders on a range which small increases in flow may cause substantial increases in approach delay and, hence, decrease in speed. This may be due to adverse signal progression, inappropriate signal timing, high volumes, or some combination of these. Average travel speeds are about 40 percent offree flow speed. Level ofService E - is characterized by significant approach delays and average travel speeds on one-third free flow speed or lower. Such operations are caused by some combination or adverse progression, high signal density, extensive queuing at critical intersections, and inappropriate signal timing. Level of Service F - characterizes flow at extremely low speeds below one-third to one-quarter of the free flow speed. Intersection congestion is likely at critical locations, with high approach delays resulting. Adverse progression is frequently a contributor to this condition. Definitions were paraphrased from the "Highway Capacity Manual". Trip Assignment Trip assignment is developed by combining the results of the trip distribution and trip generation. Due to the nature ofthe project, only short range trip assignments were performed. It is most likely that this project will be completely developed prior to the typical long term (20 years) period. Therefore, the roadways within the project should be developed to handle complete build out of the project at this time. Ll 3Un9tJ rt 0E = q.or I (EaJNr) : 3lvCS slHdYUC .:,-. .:::2ra=- tno 'ANt = N|nNt'J t Oit INll CNV StOd -8fiv\od fstvu / r'rvM6' cNrNrvllu !tctnoB-1 \..\ 11 \.::::::::.:.:,, \ :,:.:,:.:.:.]::::::::::::::l r . . . . . -111 l 11 11 , ]:::::::::::::::::::, ,:,:::: |:::::::i::::::i:::::: i:::: ::::,::::::::::::::::::::.:,::,, i::::::::::::::::: ,9d il=ffiT<Ir6>ETf ooc 1 I(, I I I I t I I I t I t T I I T T I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I t I I I I RECOMMENDATIONS This study analyzed the traffic generated by the proposed Rose Ranch Subdivision and Golf Course and its impacts on the proposed and existing transportation infrastructure. It appears that the project may reach full development within a ten year period. Based on this observation, the intersections within the project were only modeled for a full build out situation. As can be seen from Figures 14 and 16, the CR-154 / Hwy 82 intersection will be operating at below acceptable standards as an unsignalized intersection. Signalizing this intersection should reduce the LOS to acceptable levels. Reducing the LOS will have to play a major factor in the design and timing of these signals. In conclusion, all of the intersections within the project should operate well within acceptable LOS for several years into the development. However, all infrastructure should be designed and constructed at this time to handle the recommendations given above. Since the completion of the initial report for Rose Ranch, CDOT has issued the access permit for the CR 154/HWY 82 intersection, see Figure 18, based on the proposed improvments provided in this report. CDOT is currently reviewing the signal warrant analysis that has been prepared by TDA Colorado, Inc. We anticipate having a decision on the signal by not later than the end of April. At this time, the intersection does not meet any of the thirteen warrants for signalization, however, with the addition of just the 18 hole golf course or 20 single family homes the intersection does meet two (2) warrants. Based on this information we are confident that CDOT will give us autorization to design and construct the signal, but leave it out of service until the required traffic is using the intersection. Volume Count Report cenerated by MSC3000 Version 2.01 I t I I I I Generated by MSC3000 Version 2.01 Copyright 1990-1992 l,litron Systems Corporation Location CR 109 NORTH OF ROSE RANCH NORTH BOUND Location Code 31 County GARFIELD Recorder Set 04 / 1-0 / 97 13 : 51 Recording Start 04 / 1,0 / 97 14 : 0 0 Recording End 04/LL/97 11:30 Sample Time 15 Minutes Operator Number 2 Machine Number 3 Channel ..... - 1 Divide By 2 Summation No Two-Way No 1glr15 DA/\A I Thursday 04/L0 /97 Channel: l- Direction: N I 1500 1600 1700 1800 19oo 2oo0 ?10o zzoo 2300 2400 01oo 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 TotatsI t+8 14 51 54 56 28 4 12 5188660415626I I tolffi PM 1115918 19 8 15 10 9 I 15 14 9131212 151021?20 1462?300 11 503200 13603110 Factor 0 0 0 U 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 000618121514 003191751012 13431151310 0 2 11 30 10 11 21 0B:15 (Se vehicles) 17:15 (00 vehicles) Peak Hour Peak Hour Peak Hour Peak Hour 07:15 '/ 9 .0>" 15:15 83.3?t to FactorI I I I I I T I I I I I I I I t I I I I -Volume Count Report Generated by MSC3000 Version 2.01 Location Location Code Count.y Recorder Set Recording Start Recording End Sample Time Operator Number Machine Number Channel Divide By Summation Two-Way Copyright 1990-1992 Mitron Systems Corporation CR 109 NORTH OF ROSE RANCH NORTH BOUND 31 GARFIELD 04/1,1,/e] 11:57 04/l_1,/97 12:00 04/1,6/97 o9:00 15 Mi-nutes z 3 I Z No No Friday 04/LL/97 Channel: 1 Direction: N 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 Totats t+6 33 43 67 69 52 36 20 13 91257606148 1611191413 2 13 14 16 11 '.t6 ?1117112?8 4 12 15 14 11 11 6 6 l+ 4 2 l+ 4 3 1 5 1 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 4 0 1 5 0 1 0 l+ 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 AIvl Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour 1261315U,1412 1310122115187 11 B 9 13 14 10 '.t1 10991826106 Factor Factor to 09:30 (67 vehicles) Lo L7:30 (12 vehicl-es) 08:30 88.2>" 16:30 69.22 09 :45 93. B? 12 :00 6"7 .52 Saturday 04 /1,2 / 97 Channel : 1 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 t 5/+ 34 41 44 3s 25 ?8 24 16 t 12 Direction: N 2400 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 Totals 6 15 27 37 40 /.3 0 1 1 0 n 2 0 1 0 1 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 1 3 10 1B 20 6 710 97 58 43 A]VI A]VI PM PM I I I I I I I Peak Hour Peak Hour Peak Hour Peak Hour 85148 912108 B 10 9 I 9 14 11 11 7 6 6 5 6 6 3 1 1 3 ? 1 1 2 5 4 F;;i;; . :. ::.: : Factor 3 4 8 10 7 5691215 6 7 B 11 3 1 '10 't2 7 18 to to 10:45 (45 vehicles) 13:00 (S+ vehicles) I ir 38 30 40 29 29 zB 18 6 7 4 1 1 o 0 r 3 7 34 87 54 51 46 59 604 II 6 8 10 t+ 4 12 B 5 1 2 4 O 0 0 0 0 O 2 6 2t+ 9 '10 17 B I 10 I 7 9 9 3 t+ 2 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 2 t0 30 16 16 9 17 I 5 10 6 14 7 9 7 3 ? 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 8 17 11 B 10 13 10 11 7 13 9 5 9 B 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 10 16 18 17 10 21 T ..Volrime ReporI ,CR 109 NORTH OF ROSE RANCH NORTH BOT]ND, pacre 2 I Sunday 04/1,3/97 Channel: 1 Direction: N - 1300 1100 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 Totats I AM Peak Hour 07:00 to 08:00 (82 vehicles) I AM Peak Hour Factor 72.5% PM Peak Hour 13:15 to 14:15 (40 vehicles) I PM Peak Hour Factor 90.9e" I Monday 04/14/97 Channel: L Direction: N r 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2t+O0 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 Total.sI 1" *,,1 -;;-6-7 ';lll; '; "; " " ', -=' I i p p 12 r? 1t, z 9 z 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 4 23 18 i3 15 6 I 9 18 13 12 24 9 12 B 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 11 3t+ 11 11 5 15 12 B 13 9 26 I 12 8 3 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 10 23 8 9 7 25 r 10 15 11 18 ?1 18 5 3 'l 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 I 20 15 11 14 14 I-I AM Peak Hour 07:00 to 08:00 (100 vehicles) AM Peak Hour Factor 73.52II PM Peak Hour 16:15 to L't:1-5 (85 vehicles)I PM Peak Hour Factor B]-.1Z I Tuesday 04/7-5/97 Channel: L Direction: N I 1300 1400 1500 1500 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 Totats 599 I AM Peak Hour 07:00 to 08:00 (97 vehicles) I AIvl Peak Hour Factor 'lB.2Z PM Peak Hour 15:15 to 17:15 (eq vehicles) PM Peak Hour Factor 84.22I I I I I I 55 36 18 50 50 61 36 3t 1? 9 3 3 1 0 0 2 2 7 35 97 48 15 B 1/. 12 12 16 15 '10 t+ 7 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 5 21 13 13 11 10 20 19 14 11 4 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 7 31 18 I 12 6 11 6 16 12 4 't3 3 o o 1 o o o o o 1 8 28 11 r15 11 13',tz 13 1967222100002215'.t76 cenerated by MSC3000 Version 2.01 I I I I I I I I I Location Location Code County Recorder Set. Recording Start Recording End Sample Time Operator Number Machine Number Channel Divide By Summation Two-Way Copyright 1990-1992 t4itron Systems Corporation CR 109 NORTH OF ROSE RANCH NORTH 31 GARFIELD 04/16/91 o9:40 04/1,6/97 1o:00 04/L7 /97 16: oo 15 Minut.es aZ 3 1) No No BOUND Wednesday 0a/15/97 Channel: 1 Direction: N 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 Totats 51 50 66 t9 51 58 78 68 53 47 25 11 517786242 't6 13 15 11 11 9 17 21 12 10 10 0 3 17 10 13 12 11 17 19 15 11 17 5 2 2 9 9 17 15 21 1/+ 19 19 11 8 9 6 1 9 18 21 11 8 18 23 13 '.t6 12 'l 3 1 100000319211? 000001210't76 0000014231011 0001038261113 08:30 (87 vehicl-es) 1-'7 z1-5 (AZ vehicl-es) 0900 llQq Totats 11:30 (51 L3:45 (63 cles ) vehicles 0 1 0 1 lffi PM Peak Hour Peak Hour Peak Hour Peak Hour 07:30 83.7>" 15:15 10:30 61.L2 L2 :45 '75.0>" to to AM AM PM PM I I I I I I I I I Thursday T+/1,1 / gl 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1'6r0.Jzgq 49 t+1 /+O 62 53 50 1310122199 611714125 1988151312 11 12 13 12 19 24 Factor 89.1r" Channel: 1 Direction: N 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2i+00 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 Peak Peak Peak Peak Hour Hour Hour Factor Hou "r"ctor LU to Factor Count Report 72 cenerated by MSC3000 Version 2.01 I I I I I I I I I t I Location Location Code County Recorder Set. Recording Start Recording End Sample Time Operator Number Machine Number Channel Divide By Summation Two-Way Copyright 1990-1992 Mitron Systems Corporation CR 109 NORTH OF ROSE RANCH NORTH BOUND 31 GARFIELD 04/28/9i t4:55 04/28/97 15: oo 04/30/97 0e: oo 15 Minutes 2 5 2 2 No No Monday 04/28/97 Channel: 2 Direction: N 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 21+00 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 15OO 172 171 1t+7 102 68 13 32 18 2 17 55 157 122 140 132 116 97 '.121 120 Tota Is 1 855 51 30 43 2t 35 t+6 33 26 51 41 38 23 35 5t+ 33 29 AM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour 32 40 28 22 32 28 38 33 21 45 40 32 Peak Hour Peak Hour Peak Hour Peak Hour 11 7 18 ?0187 1792 ?095 01146 00128 070721 100417 07:15 to 0B:15 92 .9% 16:15 to 17:15 85 -22 27 41 41 23 27 t+5 42 31 33 29 39 19 33 4tr 33 16 20 35 32 27 (LTL vehicles) (re+ vehi-cles) 22 35 22 15 28 40 21 25 31 39 33 2t+ Factor 6 6 3 3 3 3 1 0 3 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 Tuesday 04/29/97 Channel: 2 Direction: N 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 Totals I el Bt 145 112 55 58 32 11 3 't6 51 157 126 1045 29 34 33 ?8 AM AM PM PM I I T t T I I 1620126300 14 1s 5 1 1 0 0 111492410 11 I 6 2 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 ? 1 0 1 1 1 0 to Factor to Factor 1 3 27 31 ? 1t, 40 33 9164530 1144532 0B :15 ( fSf l1:30 (155 vehicles ) vehicles ) 07:15 89.42 16:30 86.1? Factor cenerated by l,lSC3000 Version 2.01 t -'- 5- 2 No No I I I I I I Location Location Code County Recorder Set Recording Start Recording End Sample Time Operator Number Machine Number Channel- Divi-de By Summation Two-Way AM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Copyr i ght 1990- 1992 Mi t ron Systems Corporat i on CR 109 NORTH OF ROSE RANCH NORTH BOUND 31 GARFIELD04/30/gt 09:250a/to/97 10:00os/02/97 13:30 15 Minutes 2 3 2 hlednesday 04/30/97 Channel: 2 Direetion: N 1100'1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 ?300 24!g 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 10oo Totats I 151 13g r58 168 163 1s4 166 163 1ss 80 55 35 32 13I 3 ',17 12 1?4 122 107 2018 13 29 29 43 38 ?2 16 14 39 t34331e4439473e5s38 r39403236115139292835 37 48 45 45 31 42 31 31 AMItil PM 191181211 201512681 12179812 29126600 1 0 1 0 F;;i;;'::::.::.:.::: 39:33 to 11:00 (1s1 16:30 to 17:30 (184Factor 78.02 20016193829 10312282119 2 0 0 2.11 3? 30 31 0301320453328 31310410001010165827 861501100108?44533 5575100107831 3,t36893000011720502731 41 24 25 29 18 20 32 42 36 23 40 37 25 35 27 35 46 31 23 28 29 20 11 46 34 26 18 28 z'.t 42 34 28 35 28 40 ls t I t I I t I I I vehicles ) vehicles ) Thursday 05/01/97 Channel: 2 Direction: N 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 17OO 1800 1900 2000 21oo 22oo 2300 2100 0100 0200 o3o0 0400 o50o 0600 0700 q800 0900 1000 TotaLs 115 113 134 108 92 128 129 154 107 67 34 33 35 3 14 16 121 161 ',t27 '.tT3g 20 21 91 11 Peak Hour Peak Hour Peak Hour Peak Hour Factor 07:30 79.32 17:00 83.72 to 0B:30 (184 vehicles) to 1B:00 (154 vehicles)Factor cenerated by HSC3000 Version 2.01 AII AIU PM PM lr lr Ir l, T Location Location Code County Recorder SetRecording StartRecording End Sample TimeOperator Number Machine Number ChannelDivide By Summation Two-Way I Copyright 199O-1ggZ t{itron Systems Corporation CR 109 NORTH OF ROSE RANCH NORTH BOUND3L GARFTELD os/oz/gz 13:38os/02/97 14: ooos/oe/gt 11: oo15 Minutes 1 3 1 2 No Yes Friday OS/02/97 Channel: 1 Direction: N1500 1500 1700 18oO 19oO 2000 21oO 2200 23oO 24oO 0100 02oo 0300 0400 o5oo 0600 0700 0800 o90o 1000 11oO 12oO 1300 1400 Totats 70 43 36 27 13 12 10 71318263110464849 74 77 10615 18 20 26 tl 23 15 10 25 21 I 11 5 2698 18 12 13 't8 11 10 7102421100022 610310001011 726021000024 704312000026 187 17 14 10 10 89 20000040 00100055 00100066 00001446 22 31 22 30 322 623 't14 341 4 6 8 7 8 1156591012 2410111611 7108131214 AIvI Peak Hour Ait{ Peak Hour PM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Peak Hour Peak Hour Peak Hour Factor Factor Factor 1l-:00 t.o 1-2:00 (+O 76.92 15:30 t.o l-6:30 (eg 85.5? vehicles ) vehicles ) Saturday 05/03/9? Channel: 1 Direction: N1500 1600 1700 l8o0 1900 2o0o ?1oo 22oO 23oO 24oO 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 o7o0 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 rotats 13 9 10 10 41917293130534040 33 34 31 30 28 61010467 87815144 137107710 1396537 883 711 6 758 7713 Peak Hour Factor 09:30 to 10:30 (g3 vehicles)75.0? L2:O0 to 13:00 (S: vehicles)73.52 I I I 2e 36 38 35 33 27 18 I 8 5 0 0 0 0 0 2 26 47 51 53 42 45 50 51 604 6 9 13 15 11 10 4 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 I 14 18 7 11 11 19 I 11 10 10 5 11 9 8 2 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 8 12 11 9 7 15 12 I 5 9 5 6 6 6 0 3 ? 2 0 0 0 o o 1 12 11 9 10 11 12 12 7r 7 8 10 8 5 z 6 1 1 I 0 o o o 0 1 8 19 16,t4 i5 15 12 13 I volume Report 'cR 109 NORTH oF RosE r?eNcn NoRTH BouND, paqe 2 I Sunday O5/O4/97 Channel: 1 Direction: N I 1500 1600 1700 1800 19oo z00o zloo zzoo z3oo z4oo oloo 0200 03oo o4oo 0500 0600 0700 08oo o90o 1000 1100 1200 1300 14oo Totats I AI"1 Peak Hour 07;30 to 08:30 (56 vehicles) I AIII Peak Hour Factor 73.7* PM Peak Hour L2;L5 to 13:15 (58 vehicles) t PM Peak Hour Factor 76.3+ r Monday OS / 05 / 97 Channel : 1 Direct,ion: N 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 o8O0 o90O 1OOO 1100 12OO 1300 14OO Totats I ;--; 63 4s zs zz 12 3 3 z o o 0 o z zz 68 44 5e 58 641 I 17 12 14 15 1e 7 s 6 2 0 1 0 O O O 0 5 15 10 17 10 I 14 12 25 23 t5 6 7 3 0 1 1 0 0 o 0 0 3 20 13 12 17 10 24 21 13 7 7 6 2 0 2 0 0 0 o 0 0 6 ,14 ,tl 11 13 I 16 19 25 12 8 5 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 7 19 10 19 18 I AI,I Peak Hour 07:00 to 08:00 (GB vehicles) AM Peak Hour Factor 85.0? I PM Peak Hour l-6:15 to 17:l-5 (8G vehicles)I PM Peak Hour Factor 86.0? I t I I I I I I T Generated by MSC3000 Version 2-01 I I I I Location Location Code County Recorder Set Recording Start Recording End Sample Time Operator Number Machine Number Channel Divide By Summation Two-Way Copyright 1990- 1992 Mitron Systems CorPoration CR 109 NORTH OF ROSE RANCH SOUTH BOUND 33 GARFIELD 04/i-o/91 13:51 04/L0/97 14: oo o4/1-1,/91 11:30 15 Minutes a 3 z 2 No No 9 36 134 109 91 03123628 1 5 33 31 10 t, 9 t+1 22 28 t+ 19 t+8 20 25 1ga^rsD*\t 1100 1200 1300 1400 Totats 118 48 Bd{'1N 31 2t+ 17 2t+ 19 51 ll lr lr lr l: lr lr t: Thursday 04/L0/97 Channel: 2 Direction: S 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 22oo 2300 2400 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 110 105 122 131 119 85 61 39 18 2? 26 3t, 28 AM AM PM PM 32 23 36 19 35 30 23 32 37 31 32 28 Peak Hour Peak Hour Peak Hour Peak Hour 28431313620 33151914700 2516154321 33 11 '.16 8 2 1 0 Factor F;;;;;' : . . . : . . . : : : . : 1 0 1 0 08 : l5 (L'58 vehicles )'u20 L7 :1-s tyfl vehicles )15 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 07:15 o, 19 16:15 93 .82 Lo to Generated by MSC3000 Version 2.01 I t I I I Location Location Code . -..: County Recorder Set Recording Start Recording End Sample Time Operator Number Machine Number Channel Divide By Summation Two-Way copyright 1990-1992 Mitron systems corporation CR 109 NORTH OF ROSE RANCH SOUTH BOUND 33 GARFIELD o4/J,t/9'7 1-1-:57 04/L1,/97 12: oo 04/1-6/97 oe: oo 15 Minutes 2 3 2 2 No No 43 10 7 91 51 0B:15 98.0? 16:30 77 .4>" 24 53 50 22 1O:30 84 .42 1-2:L5 83.5% e5 100 v6 TLb21 23 21 32 ?1 18 32 27 Friday O4/Ll/97 Channel: 2 Direction: S 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 21oo ?2oo 23oo 24oo 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 Totats 103 90 97 147 152 133 93 58 12 tr1 19 28 12 7 20 78 140 125 12/* 114 w ^Saturday O4/L2/97 Channel: 2 Direction: S 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1B0O 1900 2OO0 ?1OO 2?OO 23OO 2t00 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 Totats )"{,4* ll lr lr lr lr lr lr t: t: 26 25 25 36 36 40 26',17 8 15 3 29282614303524168101 26 18 23 28 34 30 21 16 15 10 6 2219233952282291166 1 5 1 0 to to 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 ,| 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 4 09:15 ( 17:30 ( 2000 0000 0111 1001 11:3 O *dd LgIA 2 ',t6 27 62138 41937 82238 vehicles ) vehicles ) 211285368 07615 t+718 19 391214 151720 vehicles ) 36 21 26 28 35 33 24 15 29 37 ?0 26 AM Peak Hour AIvl Peak Hour PM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Factor Factor 125 101 86 102 100 67 71 63 48 30 38 14 912 262A1629271726191173 38 ?3 ?1 17 24 18 16 15 18 11 10 38 23 20 30 23 16 1t+ 20 12 9 15 232729?626161597310 AM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour Factor PM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Factor 2 1 6 3 to to 13 : 1 S tS.Z{ "ehicles ) b\ ount Report I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Voh:me Report, 'CR l-09 NORTH OF ROSE RiFrIitCH SOUTH BOUND' Sunday O4/L3/97 Channel: 2 Direction: S paqe 2 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 18oO 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900'1000 1100 1200 Totats 85 98 64 97 73 77 63 49 35 23 20 3 7 2 o 5 5 '.t| s6 153 130 133 100 117 W6/,T 0 1 0 2 3 2 0 2 0 0 1 1 038343'.1 253027 14115031162627 05123332242523 122?3633381940 to 08 :0 o (We vehicles) to 14:0 O (6 vehicles) qb 01 00 03 01 Monday O4/L4/97 Channel: 2 Direction: S 13OO 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 22OO 2300 2400 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 Totats 0 3 5 27 63 172 102 117 102 "U #n, 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 13835322630 04205??53616 2101749162019 2101836293537 O,4 vehicles) *€+ vehicles) n1 Tuesday 04/L5/97 Channel: 2 Direction: s '1300 '1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 ?100 2200 2300 2400 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 Totats 20 2t, 20 23 23 20 lt+ 18 19 27 16 26 23 27 1/+ 30 AM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour 92413101488 24121581123 1723 11 12t,97 23182119342 Factor F;;i;;' . . . . . : . . : : . . : 07:00 75.52 13:00 90 -7% 26 l+2 52 3B 37 Z5 24 ?6 35 33 29 30 27 26 37 30 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 AM Peak Hour 07:00 AM Peak Hour Factor 82.7% PM Peak Hour 16:00 PM Peak Hour Factor "78-O>" 118 127 11/. 122 18/+ 139 8/+ 69 27 26 11 2636362217993 ?9t*53026 17373 285931U+18565 394t,4212171043 135 96 117 131 130 155 100 79 t+4 33 11+ 363',t2220',t6821 t+1 ?5 17 11 1310 37212185030 412319511330 AM Peak Hour 07:00 AIvl Peak Hour Factor BB .9%' PM Peak Hour 17:00 PM Peak Hour Factor 94.5% 01591530 2031152?8 116't7 1724 1?9284122 0B:00 (Wvehicles) 18:0 O Q8< vehicles) 41 0 0 0 ,| to 08:00 to 17:00 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 to 4 23 65 185 1O1+wd 6h'?-35 16 23 28 ?5 34 31 ztr 39 35 35 25 38 29 35 31 24 32 35 35 to I I I Generated by ilSC3000 Version 2.0'lGenerated by ilSc3000 Version 2.0'l Copyright '1990-1992 Mitron Systems Corporation LocaTion CR 109 NORTH OF ROSE RANCH SOUTH BOUND Location Code 33 County GARFIELD Recorder Set 04/1,6/91 09:40 Recording Start o4/L6/91 10:00 Recording End 04/17/91 16:00 Sample Time 15 Minut.es Operator Number 2 Machi-ne Number 3 Channel . -.. -. 2 Divide By 2 Summation No Two-Way No I Wednesday 04/L6/97 Channel: 2 Direction: S I 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1200 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2i00 2400 0ro0 0200 0300I I I I I I I I I I I 123 134 147 130 114 126 195 181 125 91 67 t+t+ 23 23243254362319105621 31 36 t+6 38 28 25 18 13 11 2 0 0 3s315?5230191915s010 25 35 65 37 31 2t+ 11 6 2 1 0 0 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 Totals 2 2 13 41 131 125 105 1+5, \\\ a 0109333734 0028183521 013733?5?0 2O8'17t+72830 31 25 34 36 33 31 39 29 27 31 34 37 32 t+7 /+0 28 AM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Factor Factor U n 0 0 oB:30 ,# vehicles) t7:1-5 (fut"nicles) 0"7:30 to 80.9? 16: 15 to 83. s% Thursda-4/L7 /97 Ctrannel: 1100 1200 1300 1400 1700 1800 1900 2000 2 Directsion: S 2100 2200 2300 2400 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 Totals I P1 e4 123 111 13s 126 29 39 32 35 33 18 26 32 23 36 3t+ 18 37 22 33 36 29 33 29 31 35 14 39 57 770 AM AM PM PM I I I t I I I Peak Peak Peak Pea Hour Hour Hou 10:30 B'7 . BZ 1..ACLZ.tJ Fac to 11:30 (137 v es) to L3 45 (142 vehicles) r Factor 98.52 Yolume Count Re Generated by MSC3000 Version 2.01 aZ No No I I I I I I Location Location Code County Recorder Set Recording Start Recording End Sample Time Operator Number Machine Number Channel Copyright 1990-1992 Mitron Systems Corporation CR 109 NORTH OF ROSE RANCH SOUTH BOUND 33 GARFIELD 04/28/97 14:55 04/28/91 15: oo o4/30/97 o9: oo 15 Mi-nutes) 3 1 Divide By Summation Two-Way r Monday 04/28/97 Ctrannel: 1 Direction: S f 1600 t70o 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 z4o0 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 TotatsI 72 63 71 39 21 4 19 48 t+3 49 50 50 t+2 46 44 3 2 1 0 0 0 9 11 11 8 13 8 14 6 1 6 17 18 12 11 11 4 9 12 2 I 1 5 13 20 12 10 ',to 16 1 5 18 9 13 11 14 20 '.13 10 11:15 (55 vehicles) l-7:45 (78 vehicles) I I AIVIIril PM 29 11 21 '.t4 1 15171486 1t+ 15 20 8 4 112013910 2 3 2 0 3 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 U 0 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 Peak Hour Peak Hour Peak Hour Peak Hour 10:15 68.8? L6 :45 81.3? 0"7 :45 13.52 16:30 85.0? 0B:45 17:30 to to to to AIVI AIvl PM PM I I I I I t I I I Tuesday 04/29/97 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 52 63 57 1+6 '16 20 13 3 4 3 6 6 5 7 2 6 2 3 2 Peak Hour Peak Hour FacLor Peak Hour Peak Hour Factor Channel: 1 Direction: S 2300 2400 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 TotaLs 6 21 17 t+8 U 0 0 1 1 U 0 0 0 0 tt U 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 1 7 7 9 11 6 10 14 8 15 18 13 (s: vehicles) (58 vehicles) 8 1t+ 16 13 914178 17 15 10 5 18 20 1t+ 20 0 U 0 0 Volume Count Re 00 Generated by tlSC3000 Version 2.01 ) No No AM AM PM PM AM AM PM PM t t I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Copyright 1990-1992 Mitron Systems Corporation Location Location Code County Recorder Set Recording Start Recording End Sample Time Operator Number Machine Number CR 109 NORTH OF 33 GARFIELD 04 /30 / 97 09 :25 04/30 /97 1o : oo 05/02/91 13:30 15 Minutes 2 3 1 ROSE RANCH SOUTH BOUND 6 l, 2 0 0 t, 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 ,l 0 0 0 0 0 Channel- Divide By Summation Two-Way Wednesday 04/30 /97 Channel: l- DirecEion: E 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 Totats 68 53 62 75 62 61 62 64 53 18 19 11 12 418261215 2691022 1? 12 22 17 17 19 ',13 18 13 13 17 '18 8137 6 5 10 8 12 18 1 12 '.to 15616211136 151811212054 15 25 17 11 10 5 5 17121581251 Factor F;;i;;' : : : : . . : . . . . : . 0 0 1 3 to 11:00 (68 vehicl-es) to l7:30 (77 vehicles) 0 0 ? 0 to tn 5 3 1 2 4 0 0 ? 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I ,l 6 7 Peak Hour Peak Hour Peak Hour Peak Hour 10:00 65 .42 16:30 80 -22 Thursday 05/01/97 Channel: 1 Direction: E 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 U,00 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 lotats 56 43 55 50 32 6s 57 65 37 ?0 12 6 ',10 51835185? 18 8 11 11 10 6 16 19 13 8 2 131319981214201351 1312813432189122 1210171710139',177s4 2 0 0 0 0 0 6 5 11 11 1000000611 9 0000033101219 000002914813 10:30 (53 vehicles) 16:30 (75 vehicles) 2 7 0 1 Peak Hour Peak Hour Peak Hour Peak Hour 09:30 0.0? 15:30 58 .62 Factor Factor Yolumc Count Report cenerated by l,lSC5000 Version 2.01 I I I I I Location Location Code County Recorder Set Recording Start Recording End Sample Time Operator Number Machine Number ChannelDivide By Summation Two-Way Copyri ght 1990- 1992 l{i tron Systems Corporat i on CR 109 NORTH OF ROSE RANCH SOUTH BOUND 33 GARFIELD 05/02/97 13:38 os/02/97 14:00 os/05/97 11:00 15 Minutes 1 3 2 2 No Yes 16 't9 24 29 AM AI,T PM PM AM AM PM PM ll lr lr lr lr ti lr t: lr lr Friday 05/02/97 Channel: 2 Direction: S 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2100 0'100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 O80O o9O0 10OO 1100 1200 1300 1400 Totats 88 85 113 99 73 63 65 36 26 ',ts 24 9 41 48 11 50 59 79 68 1109 4582000138999 8333004021081219 4 6 8 0 1 1 0 1 1 8 15 14 I 10153112431516913 14 25 22 31 23 32 26 25 400't 2052 01140263 302'.t0087 221013413 25 28 12 15 14 26 't7 24 17 5 231719148 25 'tl 8 19 9 15 8 21 15 17 17 13 ?1 20 22 18 19 Saturday 05/03/97 Channel: 2 Direction: S 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 '1400 Totats 6 72 66 66 58 48 30 28 21 20 19 523254051617969 Peak Hour Peak Hour Factor Peak Hour Peak Hour Factor 17 18 20 13 't0 10 8 12 4 7 7 162081523',tz 105715 19 17 19 23 't1 15 5 4 4 1 6 14 17 19 15 14 11 7 7 6 8 1 11:00 to \2200 (59 vehicles) 70.22 15:45 to 15:45 (114 vehicles) 89.1? 9 11 13 27 17 19171625 16 14 15 24 15 1',t 17 16 12 11 Peak Hour Peak Hour Peak Hour Peak Hour Factor 10 :45 91-.2% 12:00 73.1,2 11:45 (52 vehicles) 13:00 (79 vehicles) Fact.or I 63 52 65 56 91 62 40 32 16 16 2 2 5 4 3 4 38 119 100 7s 60 87 107 88 1187I I 'Vol.ume Report 'Cn 109 t{Onfif Of nOSs RANcx SOITTx gOrX[D' paqe 2 I Sunday O5/O4/97 Channel: 2 Direction: S I 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100220023002400 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 Totats 16 9 15 17 39 t5't3 12 5 6 1 0 2 0 1 0 7 14 21 23 18 23 24 41 I 15 16 23 14 23 19 10 13 3 5 0 1 1 1 0 0 7 22 24 17 11 20 33 13 I 15 14 14 11 15 19 12 1 3 3 1 1 2 2 0 2 12 34 29 17 1318 27 12r 17 13 13 14 13 9 5 6 5 2 0 0 0 1 2 ? 12 19 26 18 18 26 ?3 22 I AM Peak Hour 07:30 to 08:30 (128 vehicles) I AM Peak Hour Factor 65.3? PM Peak Hour 1,22L5 to 13:15 (tZ+ vehicles) I PM Peak Hour Fact.or 75.62 I Monday O5/05/g7 Channel: 2 Direction: s 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2100 0'100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 TotatsI ;;,;;,a;,, " ,,-,,lll ,;;;*:=*=:;- ; I zz 33 32 za 26 t5 10 5 11 o z o 0 0 1 1 1 ls zg 25 21 I 31 14 32 3z 19 12 1t 3 3 1 1 0 o o z 0 5 26 zs 27 zj 27 24 27 76 19 22 8 11 3 1 0 1 0 2 0 3 17 40 24 29 21 I 27 23 34 19 13 10 25 4 O 3 2 0 0 0 0 9 15 43 24 19 20 I AI'1 Peak Hour 07:15 to 08:15 (138 vehicles) AM Peak Hour Factor 80.2% I PM Peak Hour 15:30 to 17:3 O (1,26 vehicles)I PM Peak Hour Factor 85.13 I I I t I t I I I FactorA]VI AM PM PM 1 5 2 14 A]VI AM PM PM I I I lr lr lr l: t: l: Saturday 04/12/97 Channel: 1 Direction: N 1300 1400,t500,1600 1700 1BOO 19oO 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 0100 0200 0300 o4oo 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 22 10 1t+ 17 1 0 1 1 cenerated by MSC3000 Version 2-01 Location Location Code County Recorder Set Recording Start Recording End Sample Time Operator Number Machine Number Channel Divide By 2 Summation No Two-Way No Friday 04/LL/97 Channel: 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 22 17 18 19 28 16 1 3 1 0 1 2 3 1 1 1 1 n 1 Direction: N 2300 2400 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 08oo 0900 1000 1100 1200 Totats 713111312 Copyright 1990-1992 tlitron Systems Corporation CR 109 SOUTH OF ROSE RANCH NORTH 4L GARFIELD oq/tt/gt 11:57o+/tt/gt 12: ooo+/te/gt o9: l5 15 Minutes .> 4 1 lz Dp*(S Pn6a BOUND 132 13 5 4 4 7 25229 1?795 65547 6 5 1 t, 1 1 1 1 0 U 0 0 20 00 01 20 10:45 1? 01 50 5 10 01000004 00000112 00000002 10101065 to LL:45 (19 vehicles) 1 3 5 3 Peak Hour Peak Hour Peak Hour Peak Hour 1 ,l 5 3 2 3 5 l+ 4 ? 3 B Peak Hour Peak Hour Peak Hour Peak Hour 2 3 2 2 1 2 2 3 1 3 2 1 1 1 0 1 2 2 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 n 1 Factor Factor 4'/ .5>" 15:30 to 15:30 Q9 vehicles) 80.6? 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 10:15 (11 vehicles) 13:0 O (22 vehicles) 1000 1 100 8 10 1200 TotaLs 0 1 0 U 1 5 U 2 1 1 3 2 1 2 1 0 09:15 55.0% 12:00 39.32 to to Factor 00 I e 6 8 6 r 7 16 3 1 1 3 1 0 0 0 o j ? ? 13 24 11 rs 14 162I 3 0 203 26 1 0 1 1,l 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 63 4 2 r 5 1 4222t+ 1.1 000 00 0o 0 1 0 1 3273 I 13011 1300010000000128636 5 223 1 23 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 06735 3 I 11 3 6 8 B s 1 z 1 1 o 1 o o o o o 1 o z 5 t zI gzzozr'zoloooooooool 4138 ?3 112 5 3 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 o 1 4 67 5 3 I 3e 4 6825 z't 10 o o o o o o 1 z t+s 43 I 17 16 't2 'te 2e 16 e 10 3 0 1 0 o 0 0 1 0 3 t+ 16 zz 2 180 4 4 /* 4 5 9 0 0 2 00 0 0 0 0 o 0 1 1 5 5 2t : : 12'i, 1 | : l: : : : : : ; : r : 2 2 T. Vqlu.ure Report, 'CR 109 SOUTH OF ROSE RjLNCH NORTH BOUND' paqe 2 I Sunday O4/L3/g7 Channel: l- Direction: Nr 1300 1100 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 a000 2100 2200 2300 2400 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1oo0 1'100 1200 Total.s I AM Peak Hour 08:00 to 09:0 O (24 vehicles)r AM Peak Hour Factor is.OZ PM Peak Hour 18:00 to 19:00 (fe vehicles) I PM Peak Hour Factor 66.72IMonday O4/L4/97 Channel: 1 Direction: N I 1300 '1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 0'100 0200 0300 0400 05OO 0600 O70O O8OO 09OO 1O0O 1100 1200 Totat.sI31 16 15 18 30 23 17 8 2 t+ 0 1 o 0 o 1 0 3 6 13 21 17 11 18 ?55 1 l+ 3 10 AM Peak Hour 08:15 Lo 09:15 (ZZ vehicles) r AM Peak Hour Factor B2.LZI ;il 3:3[ il:H ";;i;; . . . . +3:31 '" L"7:30 (36 vehicres) I Tuesday O4/L5/97 Channel: 1 Direction: N I 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 ?400 0100 q200 0300 0400 O5OO 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 Totats I ffi ;:* H:H F;;i;; . trZZ:" to o8:30 (22 vehicres) PM Peak Hour 16:15 to t"t--1_5 (:: vehicles) I PM Peak Hour Factor 82.52 I I I I t I I I I I T I I t I I I I I I t I I Volume Count Report Generated by MSC3000 Version 2-01 Copyright 1990-1992 trtitron Systems Corporation LocaLion CR 109 SOUTH oF ROSE RANCH NORTH BOUNDLocation Code 4LCounty GARFIELD Recorder Set 04/16/91 09:31Recording Start 04/16/97 10:00Recording End o4/L1/9i t5:45 Sample Tj-me 15 MinutesOperator Number 2 Machine Number 4Channel -..... 1Divide By 2 Summation .:... -... NoTwo-Way No Wednesday 0a/15/97 Channel: 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 20oo 24 20 23 2t+ 18 21 31 21 12 11 1 Direction: N ?1oo 2200 2300 2400 0'100 0200 q300 0400 0500 0600 ozoo 0800 09oo 10oo Totats 3131813 3510100100000733 2351'l 00000010053 5200000000001184 2100110001012523 1443t+ 123985 23444 6 10 6 9 4 663738 'l 45562 534535 18136 7813 337 891 3 11 0 A]VI AM PM PM Peak Peak Peak Peak Thursday 1 100 Peak Peak Peak Peak Hour Hour Hour Hour Factor 10:00 50 - 0? 16:30 76-9% Lo 11:00 to 17:30 (z+ vehicles ) (+o vehicles) 04/L7 /97 Channel: 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 1 Direction: N 2100 2200 2300 2400 0100 0200 132113201 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 (zt vehicles) ehicl-es ) 1000 Totats 100 AM AM PM PM Hour Hour Hour F;; Factor 11:00 65 .62 14:75 '7'1 09 to 15:15 Factor I I I Yolume Count Report Generated by MSC3000 Version 2.01 Copyright 1990-1992 Mitron Systems Corporation LOCATiON CR 109 SOUTH OF ROSE RANCH NORTH BOUND Location Code 41, 3 3 9 7 AM AM PM PM AM AM PM PM lr lr lr lr lr l: l: County Recorder Set Recording Start Recording End Sample Time Operator Number Machine Number Channel Divide By Summation Two-Way GARFIELDoq/ze/gt 1-4:L4 o+/zB/9i 15: oo o+/zo /gt oB :30 15 Minutes 2 4 I Z No No Monday 04/28/97 Channel: 1 Direction: N 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 zzoo z3oo 2400 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 '1300 1400 1500 Totats 22 31 914 5 11 15 17 11 16 13 10 19 203 531 1'l 2 4 539 '10 1 0 Peak Hour Peak Hour Peak Hour Peak Hour 0 2 0 1 1 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 0 0 1 0 0 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 0 0 0 0 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 0 1 0 0 1 l+ 1 1 5 t, 7 3 3 2 7 3 J 1+ 1 2 l+ t+ 3 5 4 11 6 0 4 3 I 0 1 1 3 7 7 2 0B:30 (19 vehicles) 16:30 (32 vehicles) 04/29/97 Channel: 1 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 0100 0200 07:30 67 .9v" 15:30 72.72 to to Direction: N 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 Tuesday 0800_.0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 Totats l+7 1 0 3 0 6 0 2 0 1 1 2 U 1 2 1 2 Peak Hour Peak Hour Peak Hour Peak Hour Factor 0 1 0 1 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 07:30 ?q )* 15:15 F 3't .5% 15 B 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 5 6 5 3 (fg vehicles) to L6 (g vd'les ) 0 0 0 0 Factor Factor 00 0000 l+81+000000000 000 000 0 Generated by MSC3000 Version 2.0'l I I I I Location Location Code County Recorder Set Recording Start Recording End Sample Time Operator Number Machine Number Channel- Copyright 1990-1992 llitron Systems Corporation CR 109 SOUTH OF ROSE RANCH NORTH BOUND 41 GARFIELD 04/30/97 1o:49 04/30/97 11:00 0s/02/97 13:30 15 Minutes 2 4 1 6 2 3 4 AIVI AM PM PM lr lr lr lr lr lr lr lr l: t: Divide By 2 Summation No Two-Way No Wednesday 04/30/97 Channel: 1 Direction: N 1200 1300 11oo 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 Totats 38 28 27 46 34 31 ?1 20 16 ? "t7 17 18 19 351 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 ? 2 3 5 7 4 1 8 4 9 4 3 3 92 10 11 78 127 5 t0 9 6 8 5 3 91289855 7 10 10 l0 2 5 3 611 76655 9 3 3 3 0 0 0 4 AIvl Peak Hour AIvl Peak Hour PM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 Factor Factor 11:00 to 1-2:00 (38 vehicles) 79.22 14:00 to 15:00 (46 vehicles) 82 . L9-" Thursday 05/0L/97 Channel: L Dj-rection: N 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 18oo 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2100 0100 0200 o3o0 0/.00 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 Totats 15 29 9 19 15 27 19 11 213392523 6 5 9 9 1 1 0 11 3 8 4 4 Peak Hour Peak Hour Peak Hour Peak Hour 3205 141 ?77 7812 5 1 3 6 7 ? 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 2 0 FacLor Factor 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 to 09:00 (39 vehicles) to 1,7:30 (3t vehicles) 9 I 0 1 6 8 8 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 B 6 7 0B:00 48 . BY" 15:30 B6.LZ 000 l'I,l' I I I I Generated by llsc3000 Version 2.01 Copyright 1990-1992 l,litron Systems Corporation Locat.ion CR 109 SOUTH OF ROSE RANCH NoRTH BoUNDLocation Code 41-County GARFIELD Recorder Set 05/02/97 14:18 Recording Start 05/03/97 14:00Recording End 05/o6/9i 11:00 Samp1e Time 1-5 MinutesOperator Number 1 Machine Number 4Channel ...... 1Divide By 2Summation NoTwo-Way Yes I Saturday 05/03/97 ChanneL: 1 Direction: N I */W 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 22oo 23oo 24oo 0100 0200 0300 o40o o5oo 0600 oToo o8o0 0900 1000 1100 12oo 1300 1400 Totats ,/g 13 g 6 6 z 6 3 1 z 1 z,r o .r 1 z 3 8 5 7 12 s 6 1ls Al,1 Peak Hour 10:30 to 11:3 O (1,2 vehicles) AI,1 Peak Hour Factor 50 - 0? PM Peak Hour 14;45 to 15:45 (14 vehicles) PM Peak Hour Fact.or B'l .5% Sunday 05/04/97 Channel: 1 Direction: N 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 O10O 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 O7O0 O80O 0900 1000 1100 '1200 13OO 1400 Totals 711 8 15 626372212242821 I I I I I I I I I I I I 2323 0 13 21 0 0 o 0 0 0 1 0 o 22 1 21 01 1 1 23 20 1 0 1,t 0 I o 0 o 0 o 1 0 2 623235 1 3 0 1 0 20 0200 1 0 02 1 ?3 1 1 2431 0 0 1 20 1 1 000 0 00 2 1 4 1 131 1 002271121000000013 027136000000020016 032210100000000102 3233410000000001415 85 7',! 137 99 3 11 11 6 52 95 3 3 2 4 11 7 5 1 AIvI Peak Hour O't:45 to 08:45 (qZ vehicles) AIvl Peak Hour Factor 7L -7* PM Peak Hour ]-2z]-5 to 13:15 (35 vehicles) PM Peak Hour Factor 81.8? I I I I cenerated by MSC3000 Version 2.01 Copyright 1990-1992 Mitron Systems Corporation Location Location Code County Recorder Set Recording Start Recordi-ng End Sample Time Operator Number Machine Number Channel Divide By Summation Two-Way CR 109 SOUTH OF 43 GARFIELD 04/LL/97 11:58 o4/1,1,/e7 12:oo 04/L6/97 o9:15 15 Minutes /, A ) 2 No No ROSE RANCH SOUTH BOTIND \2-.DA,{s D ArrA 6 13 32 1e 26 zz lsdn< A]VI A]VI PM PM ll lr lr lr lr lr ll Friday 04/LL/97 Channel: 2 Direction: S 1300 1/,00 1500 1600 1700 1800 19OO 2OOO 21OO 2200 2300 24OO 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 Totats 35 34 32 32 43 27 15 16 '15 1066107642 5 11 7 5 1t+ 5 3 6 1 5312121?6442 '10 107979220 2 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 AM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour Factor PM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Factor 31292526252119910 5 6 6 8 3 7 5 6 6 l+ 7 2 1 3 2 3 /+ 2 2 2 2 1 2 0 0 0 1 ? 01010115 00000254 200001012 102012711 to 0e:0 o dvehicles) to 15:3 O (k{ vehicl-es) zt4Lt 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 3 ,l 20 o? 01 t+0 08:00 OO - l'o 15:30 go .4e" 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 to 10 : 15 (6 vehicles )'a v) to 1-3:45 (/{vehicles) /o 264 536 647 6135 13 14 12 ,6r \3<252 62t, 142 431 Saturday 04/12/97 Channel: 2 Direction: S 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 21oo 2200 2300 21oo 0100 02oo 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 Totats 5655 57Bt* 5967 167610 2 0 0 1 0 2 1 2 0 3 2 0 Peak Hour Peak Hour Peak Hour Peak Hour Factor Factor 09:15 66.7% L2245 59.42 VOIUNC REPOrt. 'CR 109 SOUTH OF ROSE RA]TICH SOUTH BOI]ND'paqe 2 I Sunday O4/L3/97 Channel: 2 Direction: S r r3o0 1400 1500 1600 1zo0 1800 tgoo 2000 2100 2200 z3oo z4oo ollq 0200 o3o0 0400 05oo 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000'1100 1200 Totats I I I t I I I I I I I I I t I I lzot6171ele232710 5 11 40 47 34 3s 2s 74 '/^L103813584 013111012156 0 0 2 I 15 8 5 9 3t+3139976 (?{ vehtcles )'6 ()4 velntcles) \q 1 10 23 30 42 30 29 39 fr6^o47//J- 57893 B 13 3 7 14 8131266 997715 6 3 l+ 7 3 3 5 5 l1 5 3 5 l+ 6 1 5 B 5 3 3 9 lr 2 B 9 5 a 5 3 3 3 1 2 ,l 1 1 1 0 2 1 3 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 AM Peak Hour 07-45 to 08:45 AIvl Peak Hour Factor 85 - 0%' PM Peak Hour 1-'7:.45 to 18:45 PM Peak Hour Factor 83.3? t*2 37 3/* 30 54 40 29 12 3 3 1 1 1 1 n 0 1 2 0 1 0 0 tl 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 Monday O4/1.4/97 Channel: 2 Direction: S t3o0 1100 t5o0 .1600 1700 1800 19oo 2000 zloo zzoo 2300 2400 ot00 0200 0300 0400 05oo 0600 o7o0 o8o0 0900 1000 1100 1200 Totats 118131213173 11 9t+49812 1?5651797 5 15 11 9 15 6 7 4 1 2 2 5 3 0 1 AM Peak Hour 08:15 to 09:15 AM Peak Hour Factor 82 -72 PM Peak Hour 16:15 to 17:15 PM Peak Hour Factor 85.3? 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 7 4 6 7 6 (kT-vehtcf es).?P (5,'S vehicles) 1L B 16 l+t+ t+2 Tuesday O4/L5/97 Channel: 2 Direction: S 1300 1400 1500 t6o0 1700,1800 19oo 2oo0 2100 2200 z3oo zhoo 0100 0200 03oo 04oo 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 Totats I 35 41 33 t1 48 30 25 16 lrw z?i- 10 10 7 ',15 11 11 4 7 11 3 I 10 B 10 11 5 8 6 17 3 7 7 15 15 'l 1 10 8 4 3 3 5 5 3 3 1 2 0 1 0 1 n 2 0 0 AM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour Factor PM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Factor 0 U 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 1 0'/:30 to 0B:30 81.3?; 15:45 to 16:45 72 -tz 1 0 0 0 2 1 1 l+ (il vehicles) 10(95 vehtcles) \r, 4 11 16 6 7 10 211 9 t, 157 Generated by MSC3000 Vecsion 2.01 I I I I I t I I I Location Location Code County Recorder Set Recording Start Recordj-ng End Sample Time Operator Number Machine Number Channel Divide By Summation Two-Way Copyright 1990-1992 l.|itron Systems Corponation CR 109 SOUTH OF ROSE RANCH SOUTH BOUND 43 GARFIELD 04/16/97 oe:31 04/L6/9'7 1o:oo 04/L7 /97 15 :45 15 Minutes Z 4 2 z No No Wednesday O4 /1,6 / 97 Channel : 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 6/+ 49 38 54 4t+ 38 50 37 26 13 1386189101216 't5 10 12 11 13 B 9 B 9 13 A 12 12 11 13 10 27181215109163 2 Di-rection: S 2100 2200 2300 2/+A0 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 Totats 9 2 9 6 6 3 2 2 1 5 1 2 0 3 1 0 1 1 1 1 Peak Hour 10:00 Peak Hour Factor 59.32 Peak Hour 13:00 Peak Hour Factor 75.02 sday 04/1,7 / 97 619333732W a< 1 1 0 l+ 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 lffi PM 1 0 0 1 to to 11:00 14:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 (a4 vehicles)w (T{ vehicles) vl 410910 3798 3511 7 911 87 A]VI AM PM PM T t I I I I I I I 1 100 1400'1500 1600 Channel: 2 1 700 1800 1 900 2000 21 00 Direction: S 2200 2300 2400 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 -0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 -- Totats 23027 18 37 9 19 11 14 9 10 9',12911 86 661212915 3 11 5 11 13 Peak Hour .-.-u:-i.--. Peak Hour Factor . .-*.{'. Peak Hour .. .-,r-n" Peak Hour-Eatt.or 11:0 12:00 (48 vehicles) 63.2\ 13:00 85.7v" to 14:00 ehicles ) Generated by MSC3000 Version 2.01 aZ No No t I t A]VI AM PM PM lrlr lr lr lr l: l: l: Location Location County Recorder Set Recording Start Recording End Sample Time Operator Number Machine Number Channel 6139321 16176942 2s1281606 13194360 AM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Factor Factor Copyright 1990-1992 Mitron Systems Corporation CR 109 SOUTH OF ROSE RANCH SOUTH 43 GARFIELD o4 / 28 / 97 L4 :1-4 os/zB/9i 15: oooq/to/gt oB:30 15 Minutes 2 4 Z 3 1 ,l 1 n 0 U 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 0 0 0 0 010 000 030 011 10:45 to'/6.L2 15 :30 to 68 - 0% 21 15 210 511 l-1-:.45 16:30 Divide By Summation Two-Way Monday 04/28/97 Channel: 2 Direction: S 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 22oo 23oo 2400 0100 o2o0 o30o 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1'100 1200 60 61 27 31 12 1 10 27 48 tZ t+6 50 55 BOUND 11613612 1571381/+ 13 11 13 17 2? 16a7197 (Svenicles ) (r( vehicles) 7a 1500 Totats 4e b6' 4?3 6 16 20 7 1300 1400 40 46 't4 24 52 14 10 710 04/29/97 Channel: 2 Direetion: S 2100 2200 2300 2400 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 0 0 9 24 t+7 1300 1400 1500 Totats ?3816 36 26 24 10 11112 l+Bl, 7105 175 3 6 7 B Peak Hour Peak Hour Peak Hour Peak Hour 3 1 2 1 0 U ? 't Factor 3 1+ 1 1 0 0 0 0 07:30 93 .8% 16:15 77 .Lz 169 "1 .tor Code Tue 03616 0 0 0 1600 1700 0 0 U 0 2 11 15 vehicles ) Generated by llSC3000 Version 2.01 I I I AIVI AIVi PM PM tl lr lr lr lr l: l: Generated by llSC3000 Version 2.01 Copyright '1990-'1992 Mitron Systems Corporation LOCAIJ.ON CR 109 SOUTH OF ROSE RANCH SOUTH BOUND Location Code 43 Count.y GARFIELD Recorder Set. os/10/91 10:49 Recording St.art 04/30/97 11: oo Recording End 05/02/97 13:30 Samp1e Tj-me 15 Minutes Operator Number 2 Machine Number 4 Channel ...... 2 Divide By 2 Summation No Two-Way No Wednesday 04/30/97 Channel: 2 Direction: S 1200 1300 t4o0 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 0't00 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 Totats 68 60 72 83 59 50 36 34 23 10 1872717149129432 13 23 18 19 11 16 13 11 8 'l 1 21121422201518452 1618132511976711 1 3 10 ?3 37 18 t? 19 ,P. axre0 1 0 5 8 1/r 'l 1 17 0 0 0 1 9 5 13 11 0 0 1 9 11 1? 11 10 1298917711 (*6 veh.:-cles)'40 (fr vehicles ) 31 AIvl Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Peak Hour Peak Hour Peak Hour Peak Hour Factor tt1 29 18 20000 25000 00203 01000 11:00 to 12:00 81.0? 14:00 to 15:00 83.0? 1 0 1 0 100 300 000 000 to 10:30 Thursday 05/0]-/97 Clrannel: 2 Direction: S 1200 1300 1/+00 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 Tota I s )b3ub42 53 30 38 39 168768 8152193 9137318 9 ',17 14 10 10 1012121111 11 12 3 2 2 3 0 12 120530 8411100 92327574751 0008526 001239 1014711 1 0 1 9 12 11 ({avdr-icles ) 915 412 169 18 15 Factor Factor 13:00 L53' vehicles) bb 09:30 84.72 12:00 J'7 - 9v" to Factor I, l' I Volume Count Report Generated by ttSC3000 Version 2.01 Copyright 1990'1992 l,litron Systems Corporation LOCATiON CR 109 SOIITH OF ROSE RANCH SOUTH BOUND Location Code 43 ll lr lr lr lr lr lr l: l: County Recorder Set Recording Start. Recording End Sample time Operator Number Machine Number ChannelDivide By Summation Two-Way GARFIELDos/oz/gt 14:18 os/03/97 14: oo os/06/97 11-:oo 15 Minutes 1 4 2 2 No Yes Saturday O5/O3/97 Channel: 2 Direction: S 1500 1600 17oo t80o 1900 z00o zloo zzoo z3oo z4oo 01oo 0z0o o3oo 0400 0s0o 0600 oToo 08oo 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 Totats 91614 911 129 AM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour Factor PM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour 10:15 to 11:15 (8 vehicles) 65.72 L4t45 to 15:45 (17 vehicles) 7O -8>" 330 1 I O 0'l 0 0 o 0 0 3 1 0 0 22 1 3 1 2 1 0 o 1 0 0 0'l 0 0 1'.| 2 2 1 3 4 20111112000001031232 1 20 0 o 0 0'l 0 0 0 0 1 ?2 23 0 1 4 ?624 2363 1432 4330 00002610141359 110057355293 0002144875223 00011044910457 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1242232001 6?12?31130 1224022111 1?53534000 Sunday O5/O4/97 Channel: 2 Direction: S 1500 1600 1700 18oo 1900 z0o0 2,t00 2200 2300 z40o 0100 0200 03oo 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 Totats 8 12 11 9 11 33121253521112122 AM Peak Hour 05:30 to 07:30 (37 vehicles) AI,1 Peak Hour Factor 66.1-Z PM Peak Hour 12:7-5 to 1-3:15 (25 vehicles) PM Peak Hour Factor 59.4* Factor Yolunie Count Report Generated by MSC3000 Version 2.01 2 No No I t I T Copyright 1990-1992 Mitron Systems Corporation AM Alvl PM PM ll lr lr lr lr l: l: Divide By Summation Two-Way Friday 04/]-1,/97 Channel: 1 Direction: E 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 22oo 23oo 2400 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 Totats 64 48 7? 61 81 64 45 23 35 20 25 13 6 23 t+6 53 t+t+ 49 56 Location Locat.ion Code County Recorder Set Recording Start Recording End Sample Time Operator Number Machine Number Channel 910161317198 15 10 1/+ 18 29 16 13 2016221520108 20 12 20 15 15 19 16 Peak Hour Peak Hour Peak Hour Peak Hour CR L54 WEST OF 22 GARFIELDoq/tt/gt 12:36 o+/tt/gt 13: oo 04/1,5/97 o9:30 15 Minutes a Z 1 CR 109 INT EAST BOUND 52000 t,2000 t, 1000 02210 0B:30 to 09:30 81 -sz 17:15 to 18:15 '7L .62 1 2 1 2 0 ? 0 2 1 1 0 1 11:00 BL -'72 15:00 '18 .62 to to Factor 71097 5 11 1 6 6877 5635 0 0 3 1 14 10 11 16 1171115121013 03618131?1311 1 2 7 16 11 10 15 13 (e: vehicles) (83 vehicles) Saturday 04/12/97 Ctrannel: 1 Direction: E 1400 1500 t60o 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 22oo 23oo 2400 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 Totats 57 t1 66 50 t+9 39 40 29 42 19 20 71822351943 15152117139t+8527 16 10 16 9 11 12 15 t, 24 4 t t3 9 14 11 18 16 13 11 4 5 3 13 7 15 10 7 2 I 6 9 8 6 AM Peak Hour AIvl Peak Hour PM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour 1 0 0 0 2 3 5 6 11 11 0000'lt+511811 0 0 1 0 2 7 9 7 15 9 1 0 0 1 2 tr 3 11 '15 12 12:00 (qg vehicles) 15:00 (66 vehicles) Factor Factor Factor T I I I ," Voh:.me Report, 'CR 154 WEST OF CR 1-09 fNT EAST BOIINDT page 2 Sunday A4/B/97 Channel: L Direction: E '1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 Totats I 53 44 /+8 42 1s 36 33 t+t+ 18 12 15 11 10 10 137815 78813 11 10 7 6 t+ ?0 71 79 64 11 50 56 to to 7\M 7\M ItM I]M ll lr lr lr lr lr lr t: lr lr 15 10 14 10 1211127 12 11 11 11 1l+ 12 11 U+ Alvl Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour 3 6 5 4 3 3 l+ 2 4 1 0 2 0 3 ? 0 ? 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 2 07:30 to 0B:30 82.72 A2:3 0 to 13 :30 0.1% 1 0 1 2 (e0 vehicles) (0s vehicles) 0 3 2 7 2142611687 B 14 17 20 11 1t' 11 4191717121621 62419161?1217 Monday 04/14/97 Channel: 1 Direction: E 14Qq 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 Totats 67 63 62 68 96 73 36 23 27 13 21223736659656569 971 17 22 11 14 28 24 7 I 13820191523810 '15 19 15 17 29 ',t3 11 3 221416182413102 9 8 l+ 6 7 5 0 1 3 2 1 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 AM Peak Hour O'7 :45 AM Peak Hour Factor 81.0? PM Peak Hour 17:30 PM Peak Hour Factor 86.22 08:45 (Bt vehicl-es) 1B:30 (100 vehicles) 0 0 0 1 U 0 1 0 n ? 2 l+ 1 0 0 U 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 5 14 20 16 26 11 15 1151515111712 6192115131626 825l015122116 to to Tuesday 04/15/97 Channel: l- Direction: E 1/+00 '1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 ?2o0 2300 2400 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 '1200 1300 Totats 58 67 63 46 79 53 55 31 25 13 825797134 1715991119167 17 14 18 '.t6 20 10 10 U+ 891782012157 162919132812146 7 9 6 3 1+ 6 2 1 2 3 0 0 Peak Hour Peak Hour Factor Peak Hour Peak Hour Factor 0B:30 (93 vehicles) 18:15 (87 vehicles) 3 0 1 1 0 U 0 1 07:30 '77 .52 17:15 11 1y 0 1 0 0 6122321 6131613 53019 82413 Volume Count Renort Version 2.01 2 No No I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I cenerated by MSC3000 Location Location Code County Recorder Set Recording Start Recording End Sample Time Operator Number Machine Number Channel Divide By Summation Two-Way Copyright 1990-1992 Mitron Systems Corporation CR 154 WEST OF CR 109 INT EAST BOUND 22 GARFIELD 04/28/97 t6:29 04/28/97 17: Oo 04/30/91 o9:30 15 Minutes Z z 1 Monday 04/28/97 '1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 86 50 44 29 19 1t, Channel: l- 2400 0100 0200 0300 0400 Direction: E 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1q00 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 Totats 32 16 39 37 2t+ 39 70782766565355 2591313 20 18 't3 6 2710104 141386 8221513 22 11 11 10 '15 15 16 20 21 5 11 1? 618328 16162',t5 B 5 15 11 10 110396 6 5 3 5 6 l+ 1 3 2 2 2 0 I 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 001 115 0 2 10 0 5 11 07:L5 toFactor 90 .9>" t'7 :0 0 toFact.or 79 -6e" 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 0 0 0 1 F;; Factor 0B:15 (eO vehicles) 1B:00 (46 vehicles) 0 0 0 0 3 1 3 6 5 7 to 09:3 O (21 vehicles) to th{.Q Q vehic]es) 15 8 l+ 5 AIvl Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour I2 Tuesday 04/29/97 Channel: 1 Directi-on: E 2000 2100 2200 2300 2/+00 0100 0200 0300 040q 0500 0600 0700 0800 09OO 1000 1100 1200 1300 1100 1500 1600 1700 Totats 0010000000101s12 1 0 0 1 AM A]VI PM PM 0 0 0 0 Peak Peak Peak Peak Hour Hour Hour 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '75 - 02 17:00 s0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 ll I cenerated by llSC3000 Version 2.01 Copyright 1990-1992 llitron Systems Corporation I Location CR 154 WEST OF CR 109 INT EAST BOUND Location Code 22 GARFIELD 05/02/97 t3:52 os/02/97 14: oo os/06/97 l-1:15 15 Mi-nutes 1 2I 2 No Yes I fi3E3lI"; ;;i ::: : Recording Start r Recording End I sample rime Operator Number Machine NumberI channelI Divide By SummationI Two-WavI I Friday 05/02/97 Channel: 1 Direction: E I 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 Z2O0 2300 2400 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 Total.sr 21 71 59 43 13 3 12 15 36 35 40 361 t I I 3 8148 4 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4'17 ?2 14 5 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7?6 912 3 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 72014 9 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 9 9 14 10 3 9 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 7 10 11 84 7 7 8 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 5 819 7 5 6 7 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 4 5 10 6 l0 1? 9 4 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 9 10 5 7 3 5 9 10 611514 210128 4 10 9 8 AM Peak Hour 11:00 AIII Peak Hour Factor 81. B? PM Peak Hour 15:30 PM Peak Hour Factor 78.82 I Satsurday O5/O3/g7 Channel: 1 Direction: E 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 ?100 2200 2300 2400 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 Totats 30 33 35 26 24 418262847 AIvl Peak Hour AM Peak Hour Factor PM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Factor a2200 (35 vehicles) 15:30 (82 vehicles) 12:00 (26 vehicles) 14:00 (41 vehicles) to to to I t I I I I I I l-1: 00 55.0? 13 :00 61.8? I , , '. volune Report, 'cR 154 WEST oF cR 109 rlflf EAST BoIIND,paqe 2 t ffiffir"*, #'#'ilr*fr"ffihfu#ffiffefu0700 0800 'eoo 1o0o r10o 1200 13oo.,4oo Totars l 55 35 *';-' * ,l ,;;;l;l ,;;:,;*,, 64 77 81 556I AIvl Peak Hour 11:00 to l2zOO (e4, vehicles) AIvl Peak Hour Factor 6L.52 PM Peak Hour L2 :30 t.o 13 : 3 0 (A+ vehicles )PM Peak Hour Factor 77.gZ Monday 05/05/97 Channel: 1 Direction: E 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 ?1oo 22oo 23oO 24oO 01oO O20o 0300 0400 0500 o50o 0700 0800 o90o looo 11oo 1200 1300 14oo Totats 78 91 95 71 39 1'.t 11 '.t 2 1 0 o 0 0 0 s 13 2? 50 63 72 19 52a AM Peak Hour t0:00 to 11:00 (lZ vehicles) AM Peak Hour Factor 72.02 PM Peak Hour 15:30 to 1G:30 (109 vehicles) PM Peak Hour Factor 94.02 10 7 11 20 2 10 o o o 0 0 o 0 o 0 o o 4 7 g a il 25 27 I 23 13 13 7 2 10 3 O 1 O 0 O O O O O 3't 1 2 12 5,t5 20 I 6 7 10't3 1 6 0 o o o 0 o 0 0 0 1 8 2 2 6 3 12 24 ls15 8 6 10 0 0 1 o 0 0 o 0 0 o 0 1 4 8 7 12 17 26 13 le 23 11 25 17 16 7 2 0 2 0 0 o 0 o 0 0 ,l 10 7 21 21 1919 23 27 23 10 3 1 o o o o o 0 o 0 o 0 3 13 10 g 16 28 17 17 8 1 3 1 0 I 0 o o 0 o 5 4 1 6 17 2520 29 26 14 5 0 5 o o 0 o 0 0 0 o 4 8 8 4 15 17 I I I I I I t I I I I I t I I Generated by MSC3000 Version 2-01 I I I I Location Location Code County Recorder Set Recording Start Recording End Sample Time Operator Number Machine Number Channel Divide By Summation Two-Way Copyright1990-1992 Hitron Systems Corporation CR 154 WEST OF CR 109 INT WEST BOUND 24 GARFIELD 04 / La / e] 12 -.36 o4/L1,/91 13: oo 04/t6/9i o9:30 15 Minutes-Z Z Z Z No No ll lr lr lr lr lr l: l: lr Friday O4/aL/97 Channel: 2 Direction: W 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 91 84 131 128 1t+O 101 66 33 /+t+ 26 32 19 11 2 11 41 83 109 98 89 109 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 U 09:30 17:30 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 11:15 (*< 31 15 :0 o ()-+4 ffi 0 1 0 1 (fi{venicf es ) (ffi vehicl-es) @< 0 0 2 0 1 0 1 2 3 7 11 15 19 5616?418 4 17 15 18 2t, 57',t1 2523 Tota L s 1+51 utl 1300 TotaLs 7aw ls 447- 27 18 1B 12 20 29 30 31 28 11 10 1t+ 9 10 2618263655282381326 2529393327191389118 281737292726197848 6 6 5 2 3 3 1 4 0 0 0 2 AM Peak Hour 08:30 to AM Peak Hour Factor 7'7.82 PM Peak Hour 16:30 to PM Peak Hour Factor 67.32 27 21 29 25 20 12 10 15 12 3 10 2317272018192073555 2216202126181614453 20192819148131212136 1 2 1 ? 0 2 0 1+ 5 2 0 1 AM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour 17821181925 272036232223 3152625262126 5122927312735 Saturday 04/1"2/97 Channel: 2 Direction: W 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 92 73 101 85 78 57 59 t+8 63 26 24 t+ 17 37 53 82 81 Factor Factor 10:15 86.0? 15:00 B9 .7% to to vehicl-es ) vehicl-es ) I I I I I I I I I I 17I I I I I I I I VoIumE ReporL. 'CR 154 WEST OF CR 109 IMT WEST BOI}ND, Sunday 04 / 1,3 / 97 Ctrannel : 2 Direc tion : W paqe 2 1/i00 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 Totats 74 73 83 57 46 59 21 28 133 130 108 90 93 97 ffi. 6cA 18 5 l+ t, 5 /+ 1 0 3 0 l+ 2 U 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 3 AIvl Peak Hour 07:30 to 08:30 Aivl Peak Hour Factor 14.5% PM Peak Hour L2:00 to 13:00 PM Peak Hour Factor 83.62 Monday 04/1-4/97 Channel: 2 Direction: W 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2?0O 2300 2400 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 Totats 22 19 19 24 17 19 15 12 18 ',18 20 11 19 16 20 23 26 33 22 21 19 26 32 37 23 36 23 30 171615153 231211188 231312185 2016885 12173325181326 1B?73033302521 18382827163129 210513923262421 (W vehicles )\r\-c (fl vehicles ) 3L 118 112 101 12t+ 162 1 10 61 17 0 1 3 10 3/* 135 118 1O7 96 111 109 -?rB 'Aq18 22 35 26 21 39 37 22 10 3 t+ 0 1 0 0 6310001 o200010 2100001 29 55 31 30 30 36 30 t+O 16 35 37 2/+ 16 12 10 11 12 10 1745 17415 1/+ B 17 13 11 11 10 3 619372330 /, 27 32 31 28 10 38 33 30 17 14 51 16 23 ?1 AM Peak Hour 07:30 to 08:30 (ffi vehicles) AM Peak Hour Factor 7'7.52 11 PM Peak Hour L7:00 to 18:00 (ffi. vehicles) PM Peak Hour Factor 73.62 LsZ I Tuesday 04/1,5/97 Channel: 2 Direction: W I 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 Totats 95 98 101 10tr 127 88 7t+ 27 ?4 17 18 28 32 19 26 19 29 ?9 33 14 11 18 14 24 21 29 ?4 23 21 41 31 36 37 18 21 3 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 n 0 1 0 07:3 0 to 08:30 't 6 .42 a'7:L5 to 18:15 BB.5? 38 U+1 128 61 07213633 28232628 2a45lB t+ 15 52 28 (-ffi vehicles )'14\4. (#- vehic les ) AA"rl #+ Awo 5 8 2 2 3 3 0 1 AIvl Peak Hour AM Peak Hour Factor PM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Factor I I I I I I I I I I I I T I t I I I I Yolume Count Report Generated by Msc3000 Version 2.01 Copyright 1990-1992 Mitron systems Corporation Locat.ion CR 154 WEST OF CR 109 INT WEST BOUNDLocati-on Code 24 County GARFIELD Recorder Set 0 4 / 28 / 97 J.6 :29 Recording Start 04/28/97 17:00 Recording End 04/30/91 09:30 Samp1e Time 15 Minutes Operator Number 2 Machine Number 2 Channel ...... 2 Divide By 2 Summation No Two-Way ...... No Monday 04/28/97 Channel: 2 Direction: W 1800 1900 2000 2'100 2200 2300 2400 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 08OO 0900 1000]100 1200 13OO '1400 1500 1600 1700 Totats 148 9/+ 75 46 31 18 9 l+ 3 2 0 1 14 13 149 100 124 122 58 3t+ 76 74 60 66 1* ta4-1 162315156 2719885 30 19 143t+ 21 1t+953 023 116 0t12 0822 07:15 to 8B .3? 17:00 to 86.0% 08:30 53 .62 17:00 81 .LZ 29 16 14 30 3221319 32 13 10 15 298712 ?1 38 31 36 30 30 /*5 22 3(+ 17 10 29 1100 1000 1103 30'r 0 24 29 11 16 1? 10 17 16 12 18 25 Peak Hour Peak Hour Peak Hour Peak Hour Factor 0 0 1 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Factor or 0B:15 Qk vehicles)€>t, 1B:00 (.14 vehicles) \e7_ IJ Tue 1 800 1600 1700 Totats 9 9 5 5 Peak Peak Peak Peak 613 6 28 5 1 0 2 6 3 6 6 Hour Hour Hour Hour to 18:00 9:30 (00 vehicles ) vehicles ) l+3 38 3B 29 AM AIVI PM PM 31 22 2l+ 31 AM AM PM PM Factor sdi ',oil .y 04/29 /gl Channel: 2 Direction: W 2100 2200 2100 2400 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 lloo 1 108 28 3 13 t+7 26 00 00 00 000000 00 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 I I I I I Volume Count Report Generated by ilSC3000 Version 2.01 copyright 1990-1992 t{itron systems Corporation LoCAIion CR 154 WEST OF CR 109 INT WEST BOUNDLocation Code 24County GARFIELD Recorder Set. 05/02/97 L3:52 Recording Start 05/02/97 14:00 Recording End 05/05/97 11:15 Sample Time 15 Minut.es Operator Number 1 Machine Number 2Channel ...... 2Divide By 2Summation NoTwo-Way Yes Friday 05/02/97 Channel: 2 Direction: W 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 ?100 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 Totats ll lr lr lr lr lr lr t: lr lr 19 24 30 013 11 8 53 AI,1 Peak Hour AI,1 Peak Hour Factor PM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Factor 512 to 10:45 (29 vehicles) to 13:15 (29 vehicles) 3 10 11t zolltilooooooooooo5l 30131000000000001230 30311111000000000012 10230000000000002331 11100411120000000005 03001140103000000131 32240503011100000035 00100520100000001087 03 00 23 't4 AM Peak Hour 09:45 to 10:45 (f2 vehicles) AM Peak Hour Factor 60.0? PM Peak Hour 14:30 t.o l-5:3 0 (29 vehicles) PM Peak Hour Factor 55.8? Saturday OS / 03 / 97 Channel : 2 Direct,ion: W 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 Totats 11610 1 14 19 26 15 28 '.18 182 716 468 11 5 9 435 7 3 1 7 09 :45 6s.9* 12:L5 80.5? Vo].une Report, 'CR 154 ITIEST OF CR 109 I}flf MST BOIr![D'paqe 2 I I I I I t I I I I I I I I I I T I Sunday 05/04/97 CtranneL: 2 Direction: W 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 rotats 3 8 7 8 14 20 27 21 8 10 1 0 1 0 1 0 7 51 75 49 28 ?8 43 22 462 23001259100200 0303152934500 120011 5541200 0075674431'l 0 5 17 6 6 11 8 9 5 0 11 17 7 7 9 6 2 9 11 8 17 8 5451311816 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 29 215 220 17 15 ?3 1? 21 11 11 8 81015 8132 791 5 11 4 5 6 9 8 AIvt Peak Hour 07:45 to 08:45 AM Peak Hour Fact.or 88 .0? PM Peak Hour L2:L5 t.o 13:15 PM Peak Hour Factor 80.0? Monday 05/05/97 Channel: 2 Direction: w 1500 1500 '1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 Z3O0 2400 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 Totats 222331473710422763 (81 vehicles) (48 vehicles) 0 3 36 101 53 41 23 18 7 6 9 5 4 1 1 0 0 1 1 I 2 0 0 2 AM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour Factor PM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Factor 00520148418 0 0 5 13 12 11 11 00163211132 0310361696 001 000 000 001 000 07:00 to 0B:00 70.a* L7:L5 to 18:15 76.5* (tot vehicles) (sz vehicles) t t I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Volume Count Report Generated by l{sc3000 version 2.01 copyright 1990-1992 ilitron systems corporation Locat.ion Location Code County Recorder Set Recording Start Recording End Sample Time Operator Number Machine Number Channel Divide By Summation Two-Way l?6zszt141515rs CR ]-54 EAST OF CR 109 INT EAST BOUND't2 GARFIELD 05/02/97 t3:4Gos/02/97 14:00os/06/97 11:00 15 Minutes 1 1 1 Friday 05/02/97 Channel: 1 Direction: E 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 21oo 22oo 2300 24oo o10o o2oo o3oo 0400 0500 0600 0700 o80o 0900 1oo0 1100 1200 1300 .t400 Totars 41 39 52 47 30 14 12 't 10 12 24 29 23 34 21 414 2 No Yes 12 4 13 8 10 7 3 7 2,t o o 0 o 0 o o 1 2 6 s13 11 15 19 6 3 4 0 2 2 0 1 0 o o 0 0 o 5 5 49 7 11 9 8 3 2 2 2 1 2 o o 0 0 0 1 4 3 5 107 17 13 11 6 1 3 0 3 o o o 0 0 0 o 0 5 2 I 6 613 2 4 4 4 2 2 4 2 0 o 0 o 0 o 3 o 4 275553720410000003268 86245022002000006457 85523412100000015315 AM Peak Hour 09:45 to 10:45 (31 vehicles)AM Peak Hour Factor :....... 77.5* PM Peak Hour 15:45 to 1G:45 (56 vehicles)PM Peak Hour Factor 92.42 Saturday 05 / 03 / 97 Channel : 1 Direct,ion: E 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 24OO 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 O90O't000 1100 l2OO 1300 1400 Totats 281 375 8105 1097 311 5 069 153 763 11791922142820 7 2 11 6 AM Peak Hour AIvI Peak Hour Factor PM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Factor 10 : 15 to 11: 1-5 71,.92 15:15 to 16:15 69.2* vehicles) vehicles ) (23 (36 I 13 17 29 16 14 12 7 7 2 3 o 0 o o o 5 4 29 22 45 35 36 38 31 363I I 3 l'.t1 4 8 3 1 3 0 1 o o o o o o o 3 1 13 s 7 7 12 I 4635?3320100000r08677675 I 3 5 6 3 2 3 2 2 2 o 0 o o o o o 3 10 4 't2 11 8 4 6r 5 5 9 4 2 3 I 0 0 1 0 o o 0 0 2 1 8 8 13 1Z't5 20 8 I Volume neport ,Cn 154 sASr Or Cn 109 Ilrr EAST BOUND,paqe 2 I Sunday O5/04/g7 ChanneL: 1 Direcrion: EI 1500 1500 1700 1800 1900 2000 21oo 22oo 23OO 24OO 01OO 0200 0300 0400 o50o Q600 07oo 08oo ogoo 1000 1100 1200 15oo 14oo Totats I AI'1 Peak Hour 09:00 to 10:00 (45 vehicles)f AIvI Peak Hour Factor 96.5? PM Peak Hour t2:LS to 13:15 (ql vehicles) I PM Peak Hour Factor 53.8? I Monday O5/OS/97 Channel: 1 Direction: E r 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 o1o0 0200 o3o0 0400 0500 o50o qToo 0800 09oo 1000 1100 1200 1300 1/100 TotatsIIr Lo 39 60 44 33 14 tl 14 4 4 0 o 0 o 0 i 9 31 31 19 35 411 I 6 9 12 12 8 3 I o z o o o o o o 1 z 3 7 16,1 I s 4 zo t 11 3 6 10 o z o o o o o o z 12 10 11 1211 16 8 12 5 5 3 3 1 2 0 0 0 0 o 0 1 8 6 8 9r 1810 20 13 9 3 1 1 I 0 o o o o o 2 4 I 8 4 13Ir AM Peak Hour 08:45 to 09:45 (43 vehicles) AIrI Peak Hour Factor 67 -2% I PM Peak Hour 15:00 to 17:00 (60 vehicles)I PM Peak Hour Factor 75-O* I I I I I I I I I Generated by MSC3000 Version 2-01 ry 3tL AM AM PM PM I I I I I I t I I I I I I I I I I I I Location Location Code County Recorder Set Recording Start Recording End Sample Time Operator Number Machine Number Channel Copyright 1990-1992 Mitron Systems conporation CR 154 EAST OF CR 109 INT WEST BOUND L4 GARFIELD 04/1-O/97 1-4:23 04/1-o/97 r5:oo o4/1-L/97 72:J-5 15 Minutes) 1 2 Divide By 2 Summation No Two-Way No Thursday O4/L0/97 Channel: 2 Direction: w 1600't700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 Totats 66 73 79 63 26 12 12 210?6805346475020 18 17 28 22 13 20 '15 18 17 15 19 1t+ 1821179 1?536000 7341010 4002210 3450100 Factor F;;i;;' . : : . . . . . : : . . . 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 U 1 0 U 1 07:15 7 9 .5v" 16:15 '75 . Ae" 22 0ll 45 415 0B:15 L7 :1-5 I 17 11 10 10 19168716 28 13 19 15 12 25781512 @9 vehicfes)'la (E{ velntcles ) 4\ Peak Hour Peak Hour Peak Hour Peak Hour to to ount Report Generated by MSC3000 Version 2.01 15 1111 161952 t t I I I I I I I I t I I t I I I I I Location Location County Recorder Set Recording Start Recording End Sample Time Operator Number Machine Number Channel 55 65 62 17 14 16 16 16 19 10 91011133799 131723181496 2114151518159 AM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Copyright'l.990-199? Mi tron Systems Corporation CR 154 EAST OF CR 109 ]NT WEST BOUND t4 GARFIELD 04 / 1,i, / 91 a2 :26 04/1,1,/ei 13: oo o4/L6/91 o9:45 15 Minutes z 1 z 3 5 7 l+ 2 B 2 6 0 3 l+ 3 l+ l+ L 2 ,l 0 ? 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 1 0 n 1 1 1 2 46 50 t+7 37 17 ;W 7@b 61012617 B 12 '.t3 10 B 13 16 ',tl 12 12 19 12 11 9 10 Divide By 2 Summation No Two-Way No Friday O4/tL/97 Channel: 2 Direction: W 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 Totats 15 to to 1 4 4 6 vehicles )09 :45 18:15 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 1 1-2: OO (W-@ 16:00 (d a4LU n U 0 2 d -(J(/l t. ac tor tVvenicles ) 0B:45 75 .02 L'7 :15 59.52 Saturday O4/L2/97 Channel: 2 Direction: W 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 Totats t+7 38 51 28 20 22 t+0 58 3r+ ,W L1s15 10 15 9 B 3 5 13 16 12 15 9 13 11 11 6 9 9 10 1 B 8 6 1s 11 s 5 4 8 9 15 8 3',tz18B 79148 t+ 10 11 10 6 5 5 t+ 5 6 /+ 5 2 3 2 4 6 3 2 3 AM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour FacLor PM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour FacLor 0 3 2 1 1 0 1 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 3 2 4 3 10 1 vehicles ) vehicles ) 11:00 80.6? 15:00 85.0? to to Code I I I volume Report, rcR 154 EAST OF CR 109 II\lIr WEST BOUrl[Dr Sunday 04/13/97 Channel: 2 Direction: w paqe 2 1400 1500 1600 1700.1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 Totats <$venicles) (6 vehlcl-es ) 21 Monday O4/L4/97 Ctrannel: 2 Direction: w 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 22oo 23oo 2400 0100 0200 0300 04oo o5o0 0600 0700 o8o0 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 Totats 0 0 0 0 07:30 to OB:3 0 (99, vehicles) 86 -5"6 Z;b 16:30 to 1-'1 :30 t8{ vehicles)81.0? 41 823957052 1'l 7 34 82 65 57 70 85 66 18@ r,30114162220242014 0 0 1 8 19 21 15 18 18 '.18 003826 Tt+7132220 1021t+21 815 1525 lt+ 0012171820 0126202016 0024271516 2 0 3 11 31 17 lr lr lr lr lr l: l: t: 37 43 41 21 39 36 23 19 19 15 B 10 11 14 7 7 14 9 6 8 6 t, 9 13 10 1 9 B 7 6 7 2 2 9 7 9 6 15 7 7 5 3 2 0 9 1? 11 4 8 7 0 ? 1 5 2 Alvl Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour 1 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 000 000 002 030 to 08:30 to 13:00 423849187 02?02722 1 7 .)+''26 27 16291715 28242123 62 5T sz zr{ nsb 19622 14 12 11 91712 20 22 12 07:30 9L .4% 12:00 54 -B?" Tuesday 04/L5/97 Channel: 2 Direction: W 1400 1500 1600 17oO.l80o 1900 2000 2100 2200 2l0o 2400 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 Totals 7t, 6t+ 66 75 93 58 37 18 31 18 1517141729216969130 17 18 13 21 28 11 6 6 9 5 2 0 0 2122171616138132100 21722212013172132000 AM Peak Hour AlvI Peak Hour Factor PM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour 68 54 60 66 91 69 28 15 13 13 4 3 19187182232845510 161015102616732422 17918191918756300 16172019?73630111 0 U 0 0 AM Peak Hour 07:15 Ajvl Peak Hour Factor '/7 -42 PM Peak Hour L"7:1-5 PM Peak Hour Factor 81.3? 0 0 0 U to 0B:15 ffu"nrcles)to 18:15 fYft vehicles) 4b p8- g5o Factor Factor Factor t I I I Yolume Count Report Generated by MSC3000 Version 2.01 Copyright 1990-1992 Mitron Systems Corporation AM AM PM PM AM AM PM PM ll lr lr lr lr lr t: l: lr Location Location Code County Recorder Set Recording Start Recording End Sample Time Operator Number Machine Number CR 154 EAST OF CR L4 GARFIELDo+/rc/gt o9:55o+/te/gt 1o: oo os/tt /gt 15:30 15 Minutes 7 1) 109 INT WEST BOUND 3 2 2 2 3 2 1 1 110010220 000001513 000001520 0001051?17 08:15 G2 vehicles) L7:L5 (tOe vehicles) Channel Divide By 2 SummaLion No Two-Way No Wednesday Oa/A6/97 Channel: 2 Direction: w 1100 1200 13OO t40O 1500 '1600 17OO 1800 1900 2000 21OO 22OO 23OO 2t+00 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 Totats 52 68 91 86 78 69 100 93 58 26 29 17 7 24 70 76 57 .+dtl 't6 14 1? ?6 13 13 11 15 27 ?3 20 16 15 23 29 2t, Hour Hour Hour Hour 85 9 10 55 49 5 tr 4 4 07:15 64 -L>" 16:15 75.72 329 10 19 16 18 18 11 13 13 22 28 23 25 15 28 22 16 25?235247 15 19 15 19 12 Peak Peak Peak Peak Factor Factor to Thursday 04/1,7 /97 Channel: 2 Direction: w 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2t00 0100 0200 0300 62 84 89 68 95 21 0700 0800 0900 1000 Totats 419 13 17 11 1B ?0 23 16 25 Peak Peak Peak Peak 17 11 32 9 20 20 29 12 24 16 16 28 21 18 Hour Hour Hou r r Factor to :-.2:00 (84 cles ) to 14 (ga vehicles 1l:00 84.02 13:30 76.6% to @ Generated by MSc3000 Version 2.0'l I I I I I I Locat.ion Location Code Count.y Recorder Set Recording Start Recording End Sample Time Operator Number Machine Number Channel Divide By Summation Two-Way Copyright 1990-1992 Mi tron Systems Corporation CR 154 EAST OF CR 109 INT WEST BOUND L4 GARFIELD 04 / 1,7 / 97 a5 :42 04/1,7 /97 16:00 o4/2s/97 17:30 15 Minutes 2 1 2 z No No I Thursday 04/a7/97 Channel: 2 Direction: W I 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 '1100 '1200 '1300 1400 1500 1600 TotaLsI 109 88 56 28 20 77 1 10 22 62 75 70 6t+ 68 91 70 74 84 *{9 a?Dt B 7 5 7 5 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 n 0 0 U 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 '.t 15 26 22 15 20 22 18 15 26 3212191t+17830142123 13181520172?21152?11 5 16 17 15 14 15 18 18 23 16 21 Peak Hour Peak Hour Peak Hour Peak Hour I I lffi PM U+ 28 '19 10 5 37 20 19 10 '.t3 1625712 32 15 11 t+ 0 to to 04/L8/97 Ctrannel: 2 Direction: w Factor 08 :3 o ,ryvehicles) L7:L5 Q.T{ vehicles) @?- 07:30 '7 6 .92 16:15 76 -49<" I Friday 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 I 78 9t 4B 43 1t zz 18 16 t+ z o 0 z /+ z 1T 1s 18 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 Totats 2419131032663000 20 29 10 '.14 10 7 4 5 1 2 0 0 1t+ 30 15 10 1 B 3 t+ 0 0 0 0 201910935510000 0 1 1 0 Peak Hour 11:00 Peak Hour Factor '/2 -72 Peak Hour 1-6 :45 Peak Hour Factor BL.1% 64 4s 13 37 63 Ad V<oz201351317 11 B 13 9 15 11 19 14 8 16 22 9 'l 1 7 15 11 AM AM PM PM I I I I t I T 2 1 0 1 01 12 0/+ 1 10 3 10 7 611 6 4 13 11 61417 to to t2 : oo ,4 vehicl-es ) l'7 45 |*{vehicles) 4q Factor I I I Volune Report, 'CR 154 EAST OF CR 109 INT WEST BOIINDT Saturday 04/L9/97 Channel: 2 Direction: W paqe 2 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 0100 o20o 0300 0400 o5oo 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 Totals 30 42 44 28 14 27 12 t, ? 3 0 0 1 2 o 10 23 36 40 35 35 35 50 37 )AO-41, ll lr lr lr lr t: l: 711 21? 128 98 15 4 4 4 ? 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 11 9 2 7 5 2 1 1 0 0 1 0 10861022010000 87263010000? 13 109863'.! 4100 78762121000 8611 t1340"1 00 87446?11000 01611 57 0389143 02t,959 04571616 67158 89127 1291316 9 10 10 6 AM Peak Hour 10:15 to 11:15 (%, vehicl-es) AM Peak Hour Factor 55 -52 "bPM Peak Hour L3:45 to L4:4s @{'"hicles) PM Peak Hour Factor 83.32 ta Sunday 04/20/97 Channel: 2 Direction: W 1700 1800 1900 2000 21oo 22oo 2300 2400 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 Totats 36 31 31 22 15 AM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour Factor 63 78 52 3t+ 18 11 10 1 0 0 0 18 21 13 11 5 2 2 1 1 152110953110 16181?772414 141817711310 1242385A262587910076 1 0 1 1 2 15 22 20 9 18 24 20 21 14 0 0 o 1 6 21 19 16 12 19 32 22 15 18 o 1 0 1 2 20 13 17 2t+ 21 22 18 15 16 0 o 1 1 13 29 28 9 13 21 22 16 20 33 82679656351599257 0023142'1 19 14 132t*14 0 O 1 7 lt+ 15 16 'l 1 10 26 11 101522 1t+1/+18 18?1 1t' 304112915148181818 07 :30 to 08:3 O (fr vehicles) i5 . oz '?1jX{ vehrc tes ) 4\ 07:15 to 08:15 (92 velnrcles) 19.32 2r L2:00 to 13 :0 O (:.4f-vehicles) lB.Lz crb 12 58 ft( 8 13 39L 13 ',13 11 15 10 17 PM Peak Hour 1-2:00 to 13:00 PM Peak Hour Factor 88 - 5% Monday 04/21/97 Channel: 2 Direction: w 17oO 1800 1900 2000 2100 22oo 2300 ?100 0100 0200 03oo 0400 0500 0600 0700 o8o0 09oo 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 Totats 7181ffi4 AM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour Factor PM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Factor I I I I lr lr lr lr lr lr lr lr l: lr lr lr Vo1ume Report, 'CR L54 EAST OF CR L09 fNT WEST BOIINDT Tuesday 04/22/97 Channel: 2 Direction: W pacre 3 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 ?200 2300 2400 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1'100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 Totats 84 91 57 34 19 23 13 5 2 0 O 1 1 B 23 90 87 68 82 70 98 61 62 58 tDtr Xao 193120105751200 2t+23 12 165911000 21201075571000 20171514202000 01022430 00172023 10131818 006112816 1723153517198 17 18 14 26 1t, 22 17 17 18 17 18 13 10 1/* 17 23 24 19 17 11 19 PM Peak Hour 1-2:0 0 to 13 : 0 O @A vehicles ) PM Peak Hour Factor 70.0* 4\ Wednesday Oa/23/97 Channel: 2 Direction: w 1700 '1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2100 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 Totats 10 2t, 77 59 46 13 57 41 58 50 70 N, b1r18717 11 12 15 16 11 18 13 20 20 64 87 19 28 23 19 10 20 11 10 4 5 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 4 2 12 17 11 11 12 10 20 27 20 10 6 6 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 6 17 20 12 12 12 16 15 22 9 4 1 1 2 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 4 26 13 7 11 9 11 19 18 I t+ 9 4 2 O O 0 0 0 O 4'12 22 9 16 6 2t+ 4 Alvl Peak Hour 07:30 AM Peak Hour Factor 82.5% 77 61 /+0 ?t+ 20 1t+ 11 to 0B:3 o (,*9Uvehicles) 8 ',19 67 76 76 72 88 AM Peak Hour 0'7:30 to 08:30 ffrvehicles)AM Peak Hour Factor 81-.72 PM Peak Hour 16:45 to L'7:45 @A vehicles) PM Peak Hour Factor 81.5? 4\ Thursday 04/24/97 Channel: 2 Direction: W 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 Totats 2621114390052?011 15 13 11 10 5 2 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 15 21 B 6 5 1 5 0 2 0 0 1 0 'l 21 9747230000013 2920161330 6 17 ?t* 21 23 21 31813?11815 82319181822 81 7? 75 89 .WqlP 26 25 20 14 14 12 18 33 20 18 20 13 ?1 17 17 ?9 AM Peak Hour 10:15 to 11:15 (*{vdntcles) AM Peak Hour Factor 74.22 A?- PM Peak Hour 15:15 to 15:15 ().97 vehicles) PM Peak Hour Factor 0.0? 71 Volume Count Re Generated by l,lSC3000 Version 2.01Generated by l,lSC3000 Version 2.01 Copyright 1990-1992 l,ilitron Systems Corporation Locat,ion CR 154 EAST OF CR 109 INT WEST BOUNDLocation Code t4County GARFIELD Recorder Set 05/02/97 L3:4G Recording Start 05/02/97 14:00 Recording End 05/06/97 Ll:00 Sample Time 15 Minutes Operator Number 1 Machine Number 1Channel ...... 2Divide By 2Summation NoTwo-Way Yes r Friday 05/02/97 Channel: 2 Direction: W I 15oo 1600 lzoo 1800 tgoo z0oo zloo zzoo 2300 2400 o10o o2oo 0300 o4oo o5oo 0600 oz00 o8o0 0900 looo 11oo 1200 1300 1400 Totats 38 47 54 50 22 25 17 '.tz 11 619202329303434 I I I I I T I I t I to AIVT AM PM PM I I I I I I AtI Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Factor Factor 5 10 Factor Factor 9 91210 5 8 Z 5 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 5 3 6 7 5 10 21 20 6 8 5 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 4 3 5 5 11 9 1313 7 7 7 6 7 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 7 5 8 1 7 10 15 14 13 I 3 3 5 4 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 0 5 5 7 8 7 02457 14265 268712 45366 09:30 to 10:30 (32 vehicles) 72.72 15:30 to 16:30 (0f vehicles) 72.62 0 0 4 01 107 59 146 512 8 12 9 2 Saturday 05/03/97 Channel: 2 Direction: W 1500 1600 1700 '1800 1900 2000 21OO 2200 2300 2400 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 Totats lzt413223zz?11s Peak Hour Peak Hour Peak Hour Peak Hour 4171717243031 11 13 8 5 5 4 6 2 0 2 3 0 1 0 0 2 0 l21ot31ozs113321o1ooIssssiloz3zoloooloo 59864520203010002 08:45 46 .4* 15:00 7B.BZ to 09:45 (26 vehicles) 16:00 (4t vehicles) I I I I Volume Report. 'CR 154 geST OF Cn 109 INT WEST BOTND' Sunday 05/04/97 Channel: 2 Direction: w paqe 2 1500 ,t600 1700 18oo t9o0 2000 21oo z2oo 2300 2400 0100 02oo 0300 o4o0 o5o0 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 Totats 24 34 27 22 20 21 14 5 2 1 0 1 0 2 0 4 26 59 49 17 46 53 57 36 550 AM Peak Hour 07:30 to 08:30 AIvl Peak Hour Factor 87 .5% PM Peak Hour 1-2;00 to 13:00 PM Peak Hour Factor 83.8? Monday 05/05/97 Channel: 2 Direction: W 410131113121511 517181087179 61581391798 11 17 10 13 16 '.17 16 8 (53 vehicles) (57 vehicles) 1500 1500 1700 1800 1900 2OOO l'tOO 22OO 2300 2400 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 '1300 1400 Totats 70 51 48 52 t+2 20 28 11 3 2 0 1 O 1 1 7 36 69 56 40 41 579 lr lr lr lr lr lr l: l: lr 8753985'.l 00000000 61068165020000000 611 84542101010102 4687534300000102 17 8 12 3 0001? 00000 10103 00002 1611151810771110 2010161?12553000 12't4711 12433200 ?213101184134010 51810 71720 11 17 10 13 17 16 10 11 9 11 AM Peak Hour 07:00 to 08:00 (59 vehicles) AM Peak Hour Factor 95.8? PM Peak Hour 14:00 to 15:00 (70 vehicles) PM Peak Hour Factor 79.5% I I I I Volume Count Report Generated by Msc3000 Version 2.01 Copyright 1990-199? Mitron Location CR 154 EAST OF CR Location Code L2 County GARFIELD Recorder Set Recording Start Recording End Sample Time Operator Number Machine Number Channel Divide By Summation Two-Way a4 /10 / 9i L4:23 04/Lo/97 15:oo 04/rr/91 L2:L5 15 Minutes 2 1 1 z No No Systems Corporation 109 INT EAST BOUND 0 U 1 0 0 0 0 1 AM AM PM PM lr lr lr lr lr lr lr lr lr l: t: Thursday 04/LO/97 Channel: 1 Direction: E 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 23oo 2400 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1100 1500 Totats ?7 32 42 ?5 14 621573924302210 7 6 5 9 8189 956 611 6 98t+ Peak Hour Peak Hour Peak Hour Peak Hour 12612 0 3 1t+ 11 332212 2 13 15 4 6 2 4 2 1 2 0 3 0 2 tt 3 11 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 tt 0 0 FacLor Factor 0B:15 (63 vehicles) L7:45 (43 vehicles) 0 0 0 0 07:15 1L -62 a6 :45 59.72 47 t4 98 411 6 10 5 5 6 to to 00 Generated by MSC3000 Version 2.01 t I I I t I to I I I I 5 6 1 4 AM AM PM PM I I I I I I I Location Locati-on Code County Recorder Set Recording Start Recordj-ng End Sample Time Operator Number Machine Number Channel Divide By Summation Two-Way Copyright 1990-'1992 Mitron Systems Corporation CR 154 EAST OF CR 109 INT EAST BOUND 1,2 GARFIELD 04 / L1-/ 91 L2:26 04/rt/97 13: oo 04/L6/97 O9:45 15 Minutes Z 1 1 2 No No I Friday O4/Ll/97 Channel: 1 Direction: E I 1400 t5o0 1600 lzoo 1800 19oo 2oo0 2100 zzoo z3oo 2400 0to0 0200 0io0 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 Totats 37 29 30 26 t+t+ 26 17 31327?5222322 10 l+ 10 13 AM Peak Hour AIvl Peak Hour PM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Factor Factor n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 I 1 0 3 3 7 09:15 (28 vehicles) 1B:15 (45 vehicles) 1 0 0 0 0 n 0 0 1 il 1 0 0 0 0 2 ll 45 (28 vehicles) 16:15 Q9 vehicles) 87 55 B 11 87 11 01 10 00 08:15 87 .52 l'7:L5 62 -52 56 6l+ B 10 85 889321 7186422 571513 611 7530 2 U 3 1 2 1 2 3 5 5 l. 8 3 9 l+ 8 3 8 3 to 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 to I p rc 28 B 1e 14 17 11 Saturday 04/L2/97 Channel: 1400 1500'1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 1 Direction: E 2400 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 Totats 714162517 253 2 0 2 2 3 1 2 ,l l* 2 6 2 6 9 6 7 7 l+ 3 5 6 6 6 1 0 9 2 3 4 5 6 2 3 l+ 3 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 0 1 2 1 1 3 Peak Hour Peak Hour Factor Peak Hour Peak Hour Factor 3 5 6 ? 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 39 53 2 10 63 1 3 5 5 10:45 10.02 15:15 5U. O-5 to 37 I I I I I Sunday 04/L3/97 Channel: 1 Direction: E paqe 2 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 oloo o2o0 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 Totats 21 23 20 11 21 18 12 11 |t+ 5 3 1 1 0 1 2 3 20 59 50 45 24 28 28 421 5 4 5 5 7 5 6 B 4 4 4 3 3 l+ 1 5 B 5 3 6 5 2 5 6 /* 2 0 4 3 3 1 6 l+ 3 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 U 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 2 AM Peak Hour 0'7:30 to 08:30 (66 vehicles) AM Peak Hour Factor 86. B% PM Peak Hour 1-2;00 to 13:00 (28 vehicles) PM Peak Hour Factor 58.3? Monday 04/t4/97 Channel: L Direction: E 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2oo0 2100 22oo 23oo 2400 0100 02oo 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 Totats 38 31 33 37 11 35 19 t, 22 57 38 27 38 33 35 516 2151810 781218 619128 51789 9112 466 lr65 7125 1t, 13 6 10 31275 3 5 10 10 781010 lr lr lr lr lr l: l: 89 88 912 132 12 10 10 8 91 5 ',10 8 15 6B AM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour Factor PM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Factor 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 o 0 0 0 0 1 2 10 10 10 100002514127 000002319611 1 0 0 2 0 1 6 22 11 07:00 to 08:00 (65 vehicles) 73.9Y" 17:15 to 18:15 (56 vehicles) 60 .92 7 9 11 13 3 5 2 3 1 2 99167322210 8787402000 9129890?000 892341?11 1 12 11 4 0 2 1 1 710962t+10 611 223010 00413'.1t, 0 0 6 13 11 0 3 t, 19 10 018123 AM Peak Hour 07:15 to 08:15 (SS vehicfes) AM Peak Hour Factor 76.32 PM Peak Hour L6 :45 to L't : 4S (4 7 vehicles ) PM Peak Hour Factor 73.42 Tuesday 04/L5/97 Channel: l- Direction: E 1400 1500 1500 1700 1800 1900 20oo 2100 22oo 2300 24oO 0100 0200 0300 0400 05oo 0600 oToo 0800 0900 1000 11001200 1300 Totats 10 28 37 22 t+2 15 16 616653928 408 218 AM AM PM PM AM A]VI PM PM t I I I I I I I I I I I I I t I I I t Volume Count Report cenerated by MSC3000 Version 2.01 Location Location Code County Recorder Set Recordi-ng Start Recording End Sample Time Operator Number Machine Number Channel 25 32 47 35 45 36 37 t+6 25 18 11 12 6 9 5 5 11 12 10 897 7 8 10 6 18 B Peak Hour Peak Hour Peak Hour Peak Hour Copyri ght 1990-199? Mitron Systems Corporation CR 154 EAST OF CR 109 INT EAST BOUND L2 GARFIELD 04/L6/97 09:55 04/1,6/97 1o:00 04/L7 /91 15:30 15 Minutes 7 1 1 Divide By 2 Summation No Two-Way No Wednesday Oa/L6/97 Channel: l- Direction: E '1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 Totats 517514931 532 75611 117169 17 13 12 11 711312 'l 0 0 U 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 3 08:15 (60 vehicles) 13:00 (47 vehicles) 214236 4 9 5 11 t+ 14 10 10 714 11 t+ 9 9 1 6 6 7 3 2 2 5 1 3 Factor Factor 2 2 4 l+ 1 0 1 1 2 0 1 0 07:15 65.22 12:00 65.32 11:00 B4 .62 13:30 to.56 to to Tlrursday 04/L7 /97 Channel: 1 Direction: E 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 0100 0200 3t+ 1t+ 39 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 Totats 5 13 11 6 13 11 10 9 12 17 81061010 10 11 13 12 10 Peak Peak Peak Peak Hour Hour H or to 12:00 (44 vehicl-es ) to 14:30 (52 vehicles) Hour Volume Count lReport Generated by MSC3000 Version 2.01 I I I I Copyright 1990-1992 Mitron Systems Corporation lr lr lr lr lr lr lr lr l: li Location Localion Code County Recorder Set Recording Start Recording End Sample Time Operator Number Machine Number Channel Divide By 2 Summation No Two-Way No Thursday 04/t7 /97 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 49 t+5 25 19 13 12 CR 154 EAST OF L2 GARFIELD o+/tt /gt t5:42 o+/tt /gt 16: ooos/zs/gt 17:30 15 Minutes 2 1 1 Channel: l- 2300 2400 0100 0200 0300 2 9 2 0 4 2 2 0 1 0 0 0 U 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Factor FacLor CR 109 INT EAST BOI.JND Direction: E 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 B 17 t+3 38 39 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 Totats 27 38 43 35 36 16 538 't497 996 1433 843 Peak Hour Peak Hour Peak Hour Peak Hour 1 1 11 15 13 3 2 6 10 11 1?1378 3121367 67179116 741161514 817109116 5 'r0 5 11 6 10 to to 0B:30 (51 vehicles) 1-'7:1-5 (51 vehicles) 12 16 9 12 AM AM PM PM 10 14 6 9 AM AM PM PM Friday 04/L8/97 Channel:1 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 0100 0200 0300 39t92422131257220 965 15 4 8 1496 11 53 Peak Hour Peak Hour Peak Hour Peak Hour I B 1 2 0 6 2 4 1 1 2 1 3 1 3 0 2 0 0 0 0 ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Factor Factor Direction: E 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 Totats 9 21 18 33 22 25 19 38 372 07:30 Bs - 0% 16;1-5 79.72 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 0 0 0 1l:00 68. B% 17:00 B1-.72 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 'l 72:00 (33 vehicles) 1B:00 (49 vehicles) 1 3 1 3 11 3 225165 ?255411 3279123 3 8 8 6 88 3 10 48 412 to to 20 I I I I I I Voh:.ure Report 'CR 1-54 EAST OF CR L09 IIillI EAST BOIJND' Saturday 04/1,9 / 97 Channel: L Direction: E page 2 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2100 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300'1400 1500 1600 Totats 1t+ 25 25 20 B ',t1 5 1 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 3 11 11 16 24 20 11 27 24 263 5 5 6 4 2 6 3 3 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 l+ 3 2 2 2 2 1+ 3 3 7 6 4 a 0 5 1 3 l* 2 2 1 1 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 U 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 1 AM Peak Hour 11:00 to 1-2:00 (24 vehicles) AM Peak Hour Factor 50.0? PM Peak Hour 16:30 to 1--7:30 (3t vehicles) PM Peak Hour Factor 70.52 Sunday O4/20 / 97 Channel : l- Direction: E I 1700 ,1800 1900 2000 21OO 22OO 23OO 24OO 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1100 1500 1600 Totats II 19 18 22 1tr '10 /+ 3 1 O O O 2 O 1 20 55 41 29 26 31 48 3t' 18 30 432 1 11 10 181 536 735 33 73 06 612 68 5? 912 69 96 75 5 10 63 l+6 lr5 8 10 29 I I I I I I I I I I I I 7 1 l+ 4 3 5 5 5 6 5 7 4 4 6 3 1 4 1 1 4 1 0 2 1 1 0 1 1 3 1 0 0 0 il 0 n 0 0 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 AIvi Peak Hour 07 :15 AM Peak Hour Factor 65.2>" PM Peak Hour 12:00 PM Peak Hour Factor 63.2% 10 3 6 7 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 913362210000 57323120300 9 10 8 2 0 3 1 1 0 0 0 AM Peak Hour AIvl Peak Hour Factor PM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Factor 0 0 1 0 9 9 3 8 to 0B:15 (60 vehicles) to 13:00 (48 vehicles) 10210 12 12l.89965 0 0 5 16 13 10 6 6 18 11 5 5 01297218101014510 1 0 8 18 10 5 7 '13 8 12 13 18 1 1 1 1 3 10 15 /, 10 8 t, 127 92311 10 7 10 6 197 911 Monday 04/2L/97 Channel: 1 Direction: E 1700 18OO 1900 2O0O 21OO 22OO 23OO 2400 0100 02OO 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 '1300 1400 1500 1600 Totats 33 33 20 17 6 6 6 1 4 o 0 1 2 1 17 53 42 29 35 37 45 46 29 38 501 07:15 to O8:15 76.4% 15:30 to 16:30 5.2v" (ss vehicles) (47 vehicles) I Vohure Renort, 'CR l-54 EAST OF CR L09 fNT EAST BOLINDT page 3 I I I Tuesday 04/22/97 Channel: l- Direction: E 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 Totats 37 57 23 21 2 18 66 41 35 12 30 19 29 35 35 5t7 7 9 4 1 2 3 2 1 3 3 2 0 l+ 0 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 2 AM Peak Hour 07:15 to 08:15 AIvI Peak Hour Factor 76.L2 PM Peak Hour 17:00 to 18:00 PM Peak Hour Factor 64.8Y" 9?212 91t,5 10 10 2 911 4 215'.t68 6 17 9 10 21298 822109 13 5 15 86',t3 888 13 11 13 6'.t\ 8 797 8 7 '10 B 8 10 lr lr lr lr lr lr l: l: lr (61 vehicles) (57 vehicles) Wednesday Oa/23/97 Channel: 1 Direction: E 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1/100 1500 1600 Totats 31 t+7 23 15 11 11 7 19 55 36 21 30 27 18 32 23 3ti /-l+8 8 4 6 5 4 4 3 l+ 'l 5 2 3 1 5 2 3 0 1 ? 2 0 ,| U 0 0 0 1 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 1 U 0 0 0 0 AM Peak Hour 07:00 AIvl Peak Hour Factor 59.8? PM Peak Hour 17:00 PM Peak Hour Factor '78.3e" to 08:00 (55 vehicles) to 18:00 (47 vehicl-es) 711 10 15 5 11 9 10 67 47 714 135 275 5 11 13 4239 8149 311 5 6 10 5 352 9 t+ 15 5 10 79 64 09 2 '.to B7 57 8 10 3 2 0 2 Thursday 04/24/97 Channel: l- Direction: E 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2100 2400 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1500 Totats 30 33 17 10 t+ 1t+ 3t, 39 35 35 37 t+2 36 32 38 2 3 3 2 1 1 1 3 ? 1 1 1 0 ? 3 1 0 n 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 'l 1 1 0 2 tr61 t, 3 5 5 0 0 U 0 AIvt Peak Hour 10:15 to 11:15 (ql vehicles) AIvl Peak Hour Factor 69.72 PM Peak Hour 1-2:T5 to 13:15 (+S vehicles) PM Peak Hour Factor 58.8% 2549517 1t*16 125 51015715996616 37912766966 t+ 12 11 7 B 5 13 5 B 11 !^r r r r r r r r r r r r -.-..It' r r r n<4 ROSE RANCH TURNING MOVEMENTS CR.109 / WESTBANK INTERSECTION 97042.01 TURNING MOVEMENT TIME 2 2 4 TOTAL AM 7:00-7'.15 -//il/ il,! ltt Xl .//Nt /l 7 a3 7'.15-7:30 7- ilu n(tilr l a7 ul 21 7:30-7'.45 _a lNt Nl,itt\t(l1f1fJ nil Slltt /2 38 7:45-8:00 ^f, l\ Irrhli{J H fi r#+ l].tt AD 3? 8:00-8:15 Tttl ttll , q ,|ilt tt 7 /7 8: 1 5-8:30 4( ll+{ti+t. ts 2 frt 7m tt tA odo<- I B:30-8:45 tlf{ 4lt q )1-}W rtt g tq 8:45-9:00 J MDil/ lL D* Nttt 1/,,< TOTAL ,l /A6 5 10 A07 PM {* ilo,k zoh \eT/,,?i/,a4 {r 4'.00-4.15 III 14 ++JJ t \g I \++++ tltf l// \3 ZA 4"15-4.30 c fll v:)#w trilfir+ tll I r1 1A 4:30-4'.45 ?>+rrl r lil a (rI 4 +Hf 11-{{#tt \5 e"\ 4:45-5:00 It u.n ril{ I rr ufl $il \rl 5:00-5:'15 tt .?wilt q,c un l rlffi I t\e e{,p 5:15-5:30 Illt lu s.I W NIW WIII ?}3L 5:30-5:45 a tJ,fi m ll tA o Nl t+nvnw m?#*1 5:45-6:00 llt n^tfr il\ ttr \1 I (N\tlt, g t:- -{ TOTAL \C 1L 1.0 \?t Z\ 7; TL uo "/^ 1 .,I I I I I I I T II I I I I I I I I I ROSE MNCH TURNING MOVEMENTS R-l09 / CR ,154INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT ( I \ ) I ) TIME I 2 3 4 TOTAL AM 7.00-7.15 *+(tb tfr ltc l(12'trtmto ./2 7"15-7'.30 'rtt tll6 ' ll,il llfl tkfl.:'il,n t1\l i u.fi t tA ll''+1 7:30-7.45 ttu( x llfiI l,I{tr l*lI yy1 a tirKt ii'tl 1 4o 7:45-8:00 t],{lY v 'Nt),r.rfif llfl il{ d#u{1 e Utl mlt{llll'u 4? 8:00-8:'15 rttr{ ltl fr k t*{lk[l l/1 "+' ltt[4 Wfi{1 rs V{p 8:15-8:30 'fi\k{l '"w{)U'ilr(r')+{lUt b )2 8:30-8:45 ';fi I lhll*{'"rltl *il,nil ?2c B:45-9:00 'tltl fi( u N lltl')N"wh5 4'?LT- TOTAL ,5 nz*4t 10)7a1 PM 1nY.&1%34%\.g\9Ya 4"00-4'.15 n iltt.t l,Hl tl -l pr{ *r{ m r}7*, 415-4:30 llil 4 lttl \i s Ir,i( tttt 1 tA tIfr llfl tlt'l tr 4* 4.30-4.45 I (-w tfi\ \rp tt{I t La *\t t)4 nt \3 el 4:45-5:00 t*{ltt 1 t)fi )+{|tiliw n yfi\\ 1 ilil 1l{l lo 43 5:00-5:1 5 tht{ry ffi[ll '1 ll'11 t Lo W)Nl tt ?l 5:15-5 30 Wll -l l+lttW I r t tllllW r p tltl l*,{ul{\il{ltz 4"1 5:30-5:45 L ilfitN ti \z llil' b ittt t;,yt llt+ttltlli 44\ 5.45-6:00 rlll 4 '1ilW|lflU( nr wrf t LP WImil re 43 TOTAL 13 q \.4 %u Isb ffi s lrlYa nflo b?% \"% \?\ Af. \uu 'Zw"/u TURNING MOVEMENT TIME 1 2 a 4 TOTAL AM 7"00-7.15 h$Ixt 70 lr.il)il1/, 13 a4d^-) 7:15-7'.30 a D,.r}}ll \r*.t ,)/Dtt DA)^il/ll r8 *5 (a 7:30-7.45 \ eC Mrlill}flDr/l,ll *I )ki:rA/1bt{xl I tL ?/ 7:45-B:00 ^Dffiil)l.llJ1ltil lrurf I I D,,,,,,,,,,,,,,r1,+]J)^{l }i,tJ}'{.I I er /r a/r/ 8:00-8:1 5 I H/)t{}il lll ls xhfulN ".<34 B:1 5-B:30 I L BilDA III TJ ttkYill t .11. /1./'a> 8:30-B:45 i}U )rtt I .d ffiD#.. ao 2.3- 8:45-9:00 )/J/1N La ftill#( // z3 ^/TOTAL (/3b .1 /A7 a,70 PM 4:00-4:1 5 L r1J.r NrlHll/ 11 I -1 )iu )HJ }K,l 1-1 37 4.15-4.30 7r#.>r*r I fl rfl /,ti'}.lll h[aa 3l 4"30-4.45 L rHJ l,.{ll X{I rttl 1e N nra.i/1ruiJ. A0 la 4:45-5:00 I Lltltll"tr*)H/ 3A /-fi*rl,t tt t,A 3S 5:00-5:1 5 ll* Xil /,ll J {.t Iill rkDlt t &&3/ ( ) 5.15-5:30 I 4,bu llJ ilnntt /-?!ffixunr.rruM'S/ 5:30-5:45 Iil/ )"iulilt /// x6 lktruAilTxrrrrif 50 5:45-6:00 huXtll,ltr'l[rr al Ifir,trk'llt 73 34 TOTAL 4 \40t \,\\e\4o\ IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIITII ROSE RANCH TURNING MOVEMENTS CR.154 / HWY 82 INTERSECTION 97042.01 r-< 1tr \L} \s\9 lt I tl 1 5 1 1-5 30 1 3 1 5 1'rq R 0 N t5 1 1 5 1 1 I I I I I I I I I Center For Microcomputers In Transportat'ion HCS: Unsignalized InLersection Release 2.1-Page 1 **************************************************************** File Name St.reets: (N-S) Cn 109 Major Street Direction-.. - Length of Time Analyzed... Analyst Date of Analysis. . ot-her Information-. Northbound LT PR109r54.HCO NS 60 (min) JOE HOPE 7/i,7/e7 AM PEAK W/ ROSE (E-W) CR I54 RANCH TRAFFIC Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection =========:=:=========== =:=====:====:==== ======== =======:===============: No. Lanes stop/YieId Volumes PHF Grade MC's (?) su/RV's (?) CV's (?) PCErs 221 1 1 5 1 1 Southbound LTR 000 N 0 Eastbound LTR 01<0 Westbound LTR 0> I 0 81 13 11 -3 11 55 11 .9 .9 181 1 I I I Vehicle Maneuver Adjustment FacLors Critical Gap (tg) FolIow-up Time (tf) I I I T I I I Left Turn Major Road Right. Turn Minor Road Through Traffic Minor Road Left Turn Minor Road 5 . s0 5.50 6 qo 7.00 2.L0 2 .60 3-30 3.40 0< I I I I Center For Mj-crocomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.L Page 2**************************************************************** WorkSheet for TWSC Intersection I Step 1: RT from Minor Street WB EB I Conflicting Flows: Potent.ial Capacity: MovemenL Capacity: Prob. of Queue-free (vph) (pcph) (pcph) State: 0 1385 1385 0. B0 I Step 2: LT from Major Street SB NB I I Conflicting Flows: (vph) Potential Capacity: (pcph) Movement Capacity: (pcph) Prob. of Queue-free State: TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue-free State: 0 l.7L4 L71,4 0.87 0 170 0 0.87 EBIStep 3: TH from Minor Street WB I I Conflicting Flows: (vph) Potential- Capacity: (pcph) Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements Movement Capacity: (pcph) Prob. of Queue-free State: 258 771, 0.87 667 0.98 294 734 0 .87 635 0.93 Step 4: LT from Minor Street WB EBI I I Conf l-icting Flows: (vph) Potential Capacity: (pcph) Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: Adjusted Impedance Factor: Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements Movement Capacity: (pcph) 363 620 0.80 0.85 0.68 423 T t I I R 0 N 4 1 I I I I I T I Center For Microcomputers fn Transportation HCS: Unsignalized fntersection Release 2.1 Page t**************************************************************** File NameStreets: (N-S) CR 109 Major Street Direction. . . . Length of Time Analyzed... Analyst Date of Analysis. . Other Information.. PR109154 . HCo (E-w) cR 154 NS60 (min) JOE HOPE 7/L7/e7 AM PEAK EXISTING CONDITION Northbound LT 0> 0< '73 2 1 1 Sout.hbound LTR 000 N Eastbound LTR 0 1< 0 30 49 11 3 11 55 11 1.5 1.5 Westbound LT 0> 1 22 13 11 -3 11 55 11 .9 .9 R 0 I No. Lanes stop/Yiel-d Volumes PHF Grade MC,S (?) sulRv,s (?) CV's (?) PCE' s 1l5a 11 1.03 1t I I Adj ustment Factors Crit ical Gap (tg) Vehicle Maneuver Follow-up Time (tf)I I T I I I I I Left Turn Major Road Right Turn Minor Road Through Traffic Minor Road Left Turn Minor Road 5.50 5.50 6.50 7.00 2.L0 2 .60 3.30 3.40 T I I I Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1-Page 2**************************************************************** WorkSheet for TWSC Tntersection Step 1: RT from Minor Street WB EB I I Conf lict.ing Flows: (vph) Potential Capacity: (pcph) MovemenL Capacity: (pcph) Prob. of Queue-free State: 0 1385 1385 0.95 Step 2: LT from Major Street SB NBI I I Conf licting Fl-ows: (vph) PotenLiaI Capacity: (pcph) Movement Capacity: (pcph) Prob. of Queue-free State: TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue-free State: 0 17L4 l7L4 0.96 0 1700 0.96 I Step 3: TH from Minor Street WB EB I I Conflicting Flows: (vph) Potential Capacity: (pcph) Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements Movement Capacity: (pcph) Prob. of Queue-free State: 85 973 0.95 930 0.99 97 957 0.96 915 0.95 Step 4: LT from Minor Street WB EB I I I Conflicting Flows: (vph) Potential- Capacity: (pcph) Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: Adjusted Impedance Factor: Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements Movement Capacity: (pcph) 124 882 0 - 91 0.93 0.88 '77 6 I I I I I'l I Center For Microcomputers fn Transportation t HCS: Unsignalized Tntersection Release 2.1- Page 1**************************************************************** t File Name EX10e154.HC0 Streets: (N-S) CR 109 (E_W) CR L54 r Major Street Direction-... NSt ffi:il:.:: ltT: *:i::i :: 33"'ffi;l Date of Analysis. . 7 /1-7 /97I OIher InformItion.. PM PEAK EX]STING CONDITIONI Two*way Stop I No. Lanesr stop/Yietd VolumesI EII." MC's (?)I 8V{:",i, '*'r PCE's' NorthboundLTR 0>0<0 N 53 18 t1 1 SouthboundLTR 000 N Eastbound LTR 01<0 28 68 11 3 11 55 11 1.5 1 .5 Westbound LTR 0> 1 0 27 22 11 _2J 11 55 11 -9 -9 -controlled Int.ersectionI ===========T 11 55 11 11 I I I Adjustment Factors Vehicle Maneuver Critical Gap (tg)Follow-up Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road Right Turn Minor Road I l:;:"?l.l'fifil: H::3'Road I I I I I I 5.50 5.50 5 .50 7.00 2.L0 2 .50 3.30 3.40 I I CenLer For MicrocompuLers fn Transportation HCS: Unsignalized InLersection Refease 2.1 WorkSheet for TWSC Intersection Page 2 I * *** * * * * ** * * * * * * *** * ** * * * * ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * ** * * * * Jr * ** * * I Step 1: RT from Minor Street WB EBI I Conflicting Flows: Potential Capacity: Movement Capacity: Prob. of Queue-free (vph) (pcph) (pcph) State: U 1385 13 85 0.93 Step 2: LT from Major Street SB NBI I I Conf l-icting Flows: (vph) Potential Capaclty: (pcph) Movement Capacity: (pcph) Prob. of Queue-free State: TH Saturat.ion Flow Rate: (pcphpl) RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue-free State: 0 ).71-4 L714 o .9'7 0 1700 o .97 I Step 3: TH from Minor Street WB EB I I Conf f icti-ng Flows: (vph) Potential Capacity: (pcph) Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements Movement Capacity: (pcph) Prob. of Queue-free State: 62 10 03 0 .97 9'72 0.98 7l 99t 0 .97 950 0.95 Step 4: LT from Minor Street WB EBI I I Conf l-icting Flows: (vph) Potential' Capacity: (pcph) Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: Adjust,ed Impedance Factor: Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements Movement Capacity: (pcph) 110 901 0.93 0 .94 0.87 7BB I I I I I I I I I I t I I t I I I I I I I I Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized fntersection Release 2.L page 1**************************************************************** File NameSt.reets: (N-S) Cn 109Major Street Direction. Length of Time Ana1yzed... Analyst Date of Analysis. .Other Information.. EX19154P. HCo (E-W) CR 1,54 NS 50 (min) JOE HOPE 7/L7/e7 PM PEAK W/ ROSE RANCH NorthboundLTR 0>0<0 N 155 52 11 1 1 5 1 1 1 5 1 1 Southbound LTR 000 N L 0 Eastbound West.bound LTR 0> 1 0 97 22 11 -31l 55 11 .9 .9 TR 1< 0 28 223 11 3 11 55 11 1.5 1.5 No. Lanes Stop/Yield Vol-umes PHF Grade MC's (?) su/RV's (?) CV's (?) PCE' s Vehicfe Maneuver Adj ustment Factors Critical Gap (tgr) Fol1ow-up Time (tf) Left Turn Major RoadRight Turn Minor Road Through Traffic Minor RoadLeft Turn Minor Road s.50 5.50 5. s0 7.00 2.L0 2 .60 3.30 3.40 I 0 I I I I Center For Microcomputers In TransportationHCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.a Page 2**************************************************************** WorkSheet for TWSC Tntersection Step RT from Minor Street.WB EBI I Conflicting Flows: (vph) Potent.ial Capacity: (pcph) Movement Capacity: (pcph) Prob. of Queue-free State: 0 1385 1385 0.'/6 t Step 2: LT from Major Street SB NB I I Conflicting Flows: (vph) Potential Capacity: (pcph) Movement Capacity: (pcph) Prob. of Queue-free State: TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) RT Saturation Ffow Rate: (pcphpl) Major LT Shared Lane prob. of Queue-free State: 0 L7t4 17a4 0.91 0 170 0 0.91 EBIStepTH from Minor Street WB I I Conf lict.ing Flows: (wph) Potential Capacity: (pcph) Capacity Adjustment Factordue to Impeding Movements Movement Capacity: (pcph) Prob. of Queue-free State: 182 854 0.91 '774 o 97 208 824 0.91 '7 4'7 0 .94 Step LT from Minor Street WB EBI I I Conflicting Flows: (vph) Potential Capacity: (pcph) Major LT, Minor TH Tmpedance Factor: Adjusted Impedance Factor:Capacity Adjustment Factordue to Impeding Movements Movement Capacity: (pcph) 308 673 0. 85 0.89 0 .6'7 454 I t I n T I Center For Microcomputers fn Transportat.ionr HCS: unsignalized rntersection Release 2.1 page 1**************************************************************** I t t I T I I Fil-e Name Streets: (N-S) HWy 182Major Street Direction. . . .Length of Time Analyzed. -.Analyst Date of Analysis. . Ot.her Information. . NorthboundLTR 12< 1 5 1 9 EX82154A.HCO (E-W) CR 109 NS 60 (min) JOE HOPE 1/17/e7 AM PEAK EX]STING CONDITION Southbound LTR 0>2a N o 2a32 78 111 3 111 555 111 1.5 1.5 1.5 EastboundLTR 0> 1< 0 Westbound No. Lanes Stop/Yield Volumes PHF Grade MC's (?) sulRv's (?) CV's (?) PCE' S 0 N 0 1 L 0> 0 1 TR 1< 0 0 95 1 1189 11 -311 55 11 9 .9 86 0 2 111 4 111 55s 111 1.3 1.3 1.3 1 5 1 1 o 1 -1 1 5 1 1 1 E 1 1 I I I Adjustment Factors Vehicle Maneuver Critical Gap (tg)Fo11ow-up Time (tf) I I I I I I I Left Turn Major RoadRight Turn Minor Road Through Traffic Minor RoadLeft Turn Mi-nor Road 5.50 5.50 6.50 7.00 2.to 2 .60 3.30 3.40 I I I I Center For Microcomput.ers fn Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Re1ease 2.1-Page.2**************************************************************** WorkSheet for TWSC Intersection Step I: RT from Minor Street WB EBI I Conf l-icting Flows: Potential Capacit.y: Movement Capacity: Prob. of Queue-free (vph) (pcph) (pcph) State: 594 692 692 1.00 1066 399 399 0.99 SBIStep 2: LT from Major Street NB I T Conflicting Flows: (vph) Potent j-a1 Capacity: (pcph) Movement Capacity: (pcph) Prob. of Queue-free State: TH Saturation Flow Rat.e: (pcphpl) RT Saturation F1ow Rate: (pcphpl) Major LT Shared Lane prob. of Queue-free State: 118 9 394 394 1.00 3400 1.00 221,0 aa2 1,L2 0.99 I Step 3: TH from Minor Street.WB t I Conf lict.ing Flows: (wph) Potential Capacity: (pcph) Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements Movement Capacity: (pcph) Prob. of Queue-free State: 3400 11 0.99 11 1.00 3322 1_2 0.99 1,2 1.00 Step 4: LT from Minor SLreet WB EBI T T Conf l-icting Flows: (vph) Potential Capacity: (pcph) Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: Adjusted Impedance Factor: Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements Movement Capacity: (pcph) 3322 a 3351 I 0 0 99 99 99 B 0 .99 o gg 0 .99 B I I I I EB I I Center For Microcomputers In Transportationr HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.i. page 1**************************************************************** I File Name pRB21s4A.HCo Streets: (N-S) HWY 182 (E-w) cR 10e I Major Street DirecLion. .. NS I Length of Time Analyzed. . - 60 (min) Analyst JOE HOPE _ Date of Analysis. . 7 / L7 / 9l I Other Informarion.. AM PEAK W/ ROSE RANCH Two-way StopI ==:=::=====T t lo. Lanes Stop/Yield Volumes I PHF I Grade MC's (Z) I SU/RV'S (%) I CV's (?) PCErs NorthboundLTR l2<0 N 3 1189 0 111 -3 111 555 111 .9 .9 .9 Southbound LTR 0>2a N 0 2L32 208 111 3 111 555 111 1.5 1-5 1.5 EastboundLTR 0> 1< 0 23405 111 4 111 555 111 1 .3 1.3 1.3 Westbound LTR 0> l< 0 000 1 1 .95_I 111 555 111 111 I I I Adjustment Factors Vehicl-e Maneuver Critical Gap (tg)Fo1low-up Time (tf) Left Turn Major RoadI i:?F;l,FnTti:'x:H: R'ad I I I I I I 5.50 s.50 6 . s0 7.00 2.10 2 .60 3.30 3.40 I T t I Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized InLersection Release 2 -J. page Z**************************************************************** WorkSheet for TWSC fntersection Step 1: RT from Minor Street WB EBt I Conflicting Flows: Potential Capacity: Movement Capacity: Prob. of Queue-free (vph) (pcph) (pcph) State: 594 692 Aqz 1.00 1066 399 399 0.98 SBIStep 2: LT from Major Street NB I I Conflicting Flows: (vph) Potential Capacity: (pcph) Movement Capacity: (pcph) Prob. of Queue-free StaLe: TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) Major LT Shared Lane Prob.of Queue-free State: 118 9 394 394 1.00 3400 1.00 2340 95 95 0 -97 I Step TH from Minor Street EB I I Conflicting Flows: (vph) Potential Capacity: (pcph) Capacity Adjust.ment Factordue to Impeding Movements Movement Capacity: (pcph) Prob. of Queue-free State: 3532 9 o .97 9 1.00 3324 1"2 0 .97 L2 1.00 Step 4: LT from Minor Street WB EBI I I Conflicting Flows: (vph) Potential Capacity: (pcph) Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: Adjusted Impedance Factor: Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements Movement Capacity: (pcph) 3324 I o .91 0.98 0.96 B 3428 7 0 .97 0.98 0.98 7 I I I I o 1 4 1 5 1 51 R 1 N 92 1 1 5 1 1 .51 R 0 N 52 1 T t I I I I I I I CenLer For Microcomput.ers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 1 ********************************************** Jr***************** File Name EXB 21_54p. HCOStreets: (N-S) HWY 182 (E-W) CR 109Major Street Direction. NS Length of Time Ana1yzed... 50 (min) Analyst JOE HOPEDate of Analysis.. 1/t7/91 OLher fnformation.. PM PEAK EXISTING CONDITION Two-way St.op-controll_ed Intersect.ion LT 0>2 0 1098 11 3 11 55 11 1.51 1.51 Eastbound LTR 0> 1< 0 ---;,---). 4 2206 11 -311 55 11 .9L6 .9].5 No. Lanes srop/Yield Volumes PHF Grade MC's (?) su/RV's (z) CV's (?) PCE' S NorthboundLT Southbound =============== Westbound LTR 0> l_< 0 1 5 1 .91,6 72 1 1 5 1 t .25 1_ .2 0 1 1 5 1 1.03 1 3 1 1 5 1 .25 0 1 -1 1 5 t- 03 1 0 .95 1 5 I .03 I I I Vehicl-e Maneuver Adjustment Factors Critical Gap (tg)Fo11ow-up Time (tf) I I I T I I I Left. Turn Major Road Right Turn Minor Road Through Traffic Minor RoadLeft Turn Minor Road 5 . s0 5.50 6.50 7.00 2.L0 2 .60 3.30 3.40 I I I I Center For MicrocompuLers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized fntersection Release 2.t page 2** * * * * **** ** * * ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * * * * Jr * * * * * * * * * * * * * WorkSheet for TWSC fntersection Step 1: RT from Minor Street WB EBI I Conflicting Flows: Potential Capacit.y: Movement Capacity: Prob. of Queue-free (vph) (pcph) (pcph) St.ate: ta29 371 37t 1.00 549 730 730 0.99 I Step 2: LT from Major Street SB NB I I Conf licting Fl-ows: (vph) Potent j-aI Capacity: (pcph) Movement Capacity: (pcph) Prob. of Queue-free State: TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) RT SaLuratj-on Flow Rate: (pcphpl) Major LT Shared Lane prob. of Queue-free State: 2258 105 105 1.00 3400 1.00 119 0 394 394 o gq 3400 1700 o .97 I Step 3: TH from Minor Street WB EB I I Conf l-icting Flows: (wph)Potential Capacity: (pcph) Capacity Adjustment Factordue to Impeding Movements Movement. Capacity: (pcph) Prob. of Queue-free State: 3426 11 0 .97 11 1.00 3360 a2 0 .97 1) 1.00 Step 4: LT from Minor Street WB EBI t Conflicting Flows: (wph) Potential Capacity: (pcph) Major LT, Minor TH fmpedance Factor: Adjusted Impedance Factor:Capacity Adjust.ment Factor due to Impeding Movement.s Movement Capacity: (pcph) 3334 B o -97 0.98 0 .97 8 3354 B o .97 0.98 0.98 t I I I I I I T I I I I I I I Center For Microcomputers fn. Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 1**************************************************************** File Name Streets: (N-S) HWY 182 Major Street Direction. . . . Length of Time Ana1yzed... Analyst Date of Analysis. . Other Information.. NorthboundLTR No. Lanes stop/Yield Volumes PHF Grade MC's (?) su/RV's (?) CV's (?) PCE's L2< PR82154P.HCO (E-W) CR 109 NS 60 (min) JOE HOPE 7/1-7/e7 PM PEAK w/ ROSE RANCH 5 2206 11 -3 11 55 11 gg 0 N 0 1 1 5 1 9 Southbound LTR 0> 2 _ -; N 246 1 1 5 1 1.5 0 1 East.bound LTR WestboundLT 0>1<0 0 1 1098 1 3 1 5 1 1.5 0> 473 1 1 5 1 1.3 1< n 1 4 1 5 1 1.3 5 1 1 5 1 1 0 1 -1 1 5 1 1 1 5 1 1 0 95 1 5 1 1.5 1 5 1 1.3 I I I Vehicle Maneuver Adjustment Factors Crit.ical Gap (tgr) Follow-up Time (tr) I I I I I I I Left Turn Major Road Right Turn Minor Road Through Traffic Minor Road Left Turn Minor Road 5.50 5.50 6.50 7.00 2.t0 2 .60 3.30 3.40 I I I t Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Tntersection Release 2.1 Page 2**************************************************************** WorkSheet for TWSC Intersect.ion Step 1: RT from Minor Street WB EBI I Conf l-ict.ing Plows: Potential CapaciLy: Movement Capacity: Prob. of Queue-free (vph) (pcph) (pcph) State: 110 3 382 382 1.00 549 '/30 t3u 0 .99 I Step 2: LT from Major St.reet SB NB I I Conflicting Flows: (vph) Potential Capacity: (pcph) Movement Capacity: (pcph) Prob. of Queue-free State: TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue-free State: 2206tt2 7]-2 1.00 3400 1.00 l-344 5ZO 325 0.99 I Step 3: TH from Minor Street WB EB I I Conflicting Flows: (vph) Pot.ential Capacity: (pcph) Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements Movement Capacity: (pcph) Prob. of Queue-free State: 3 s55 9 0.99 9 1.00 3309 13 o gg 13 1- 00 Step 4: LT from Minor Street WB EBI I I Conflicting Flows: (vph) Potential Capacity: (pcph) Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: Adjusted Impedance Factor: Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding MovemenLs Movement Capacity: (pcph) 3308 8 o .99 0.99 0 .98 t, 3432 1 0 .99 0.99 0. 99 7 I I t I t I I T I I I I I I I T I T I I I 3773 CHERRY CREEK NoRTH ORIVE. SUITE 70I OENVER, CoLoRAoo AO2O9-3427 PHoNET 3o3 321 2547, FAx: 3o3 399 0448 email: bbc@bbcresearch.com www.bbcresea rch.com 1. . #,. . ^r,, dElb , TillilIE RESEARCH & CONSULTING May 20,1998 Mr. Ron Heggemeier Heggemeier & Stone PC 19555 East Mainstreet Parker, Colorado 80134 Re: Rose Ranch Fiscal Impact Analysis Dear Mr. Heggemeier: This letter report details the prospective fiscal impact of the proposed Rose Ranch project on Garfield County. Background The Rose Ranch project is located in unincorporated Garfield County. The Rose -r-r .-\ Ranch proposai anticipates development of 292 residentiai units and a golf I *?- ( course. No commercial development is anticipated on-site. At this point in theg"Rt - phnning tion schedule and !'srrrrc, price leveis for the residential component remain uncertain, although estimates /{Star^f-arrt, have been developed by Roaring Fork Investments, LLC for this anaiysis. /ro Sr.op,' elL i s Public Service Provision C.ma/1rd t Garfield County is the primary public service provider in the area and wi-lt have responsibiiity for reguiatory review, building inspection and law enforcement. General county services that will be impacted by the Rose Ranch project include the general administrative and support functions of county government (e.g., board of commissioners, county manager, county attomey), and services that are less directly affected (e.g, operation of county jail, animal safety, public health nurse) All roads in the project are assurned to be private; therefore, the countv's largest service expense, road and bridge maintenance, will not be directly affected. The developer will finance and install all on-site infrastructure, including water, sewer, roads, landscaping, and recreationai amenities. A homeowners association will be created to provide a design review function and have authority for enforcement of covenants. This type of association typicaily also has responsibility for maintenance of the intemal road network, management of open space, and maintenance of on-site recreation and community facilities.rl Ir ffiFEJ)@(.r.{TY MAY 2 7 l99B T I I I T T I I I t I t I t I t I page 2 Treatment of lnflation in this Analysis Based on Roaring Fork Investments, LLC's intemal financial projections, the residential component of the Rose Ranch project will be developed over a 5-year period. Over that period inJlation will affect the revenues produced by the development (property taxes, sales taxes and building permit fees) and the expendifures incurred in providing govemment services to the development. This analysis presumes that the cost of providing services increases at the same rate that property values and the prices of consumer goods do. Under that assumption, the relationship between revenues generated and expenses incurred remains the same regardless of the inflation rate. Therefore, BBC has shown ali calcuiations in constant 1998 dollars rather than inJlated future dollars. lmpact on Garfield County Revenues Garfield County relies principaitv upon local propertv taxes to support generai govelTunent functions and reserves sales tax receipts for the library and public works funds. The county also receives a significant amount of state funding, largely for social services and road and bridge maintenance. In order to determine the project's impact on county revenue streams, BBC compiled a list of assumptions regarding the nature and vaiue of anticipated development. These assumptions and applicable tax rates are specified in the attached Exhibits 1 and 2. These data are used to develop the assessed value projections set forth in Exhibit 3. At buiid-out, Rose Ranch will create $15.8 mii.Lion in new assessed valuation and generate $215,000 in annual county property tax receipts. Approximately 76 percent of the project's assessed valuation is associated with the residential element of this project. The remaining assessed value stems lrom the golf course and club house, which has been estimated using a 72 percent capitalization rate against the golf course's projected cash flow at residential buiid-out in 2003. Garfield County also levies a one percent sales tax on non-food retail sales. The Rose Ranch project anticipates approximately $3.2 million in taxable sales activitv at the golf course from greens fees, equipment rental, concessions and the driving range. An additional $7.1 million in retail taxable sales is expected from Rose Ranch's 292 households. At project completion, the development will generate approximately $104,000 per year in county sales taxes (Exhibit 4). lmpact on Garfield County Expenses Garfield County provides the traditional range of county services. Chief among these services are public safety (which includes operation of the county jail, the,l J l: l: lr lr lr lr lr l:I I I I t I page 3 district attomey's office and sherilf's services), social services and road and bridge maintenance and construction. Exhibit 5 details the 1998 Garfield County budget, shows the proportion of costs supported by local revenues and calculates a per household cost for providing counfy services. In generai, the Rose Ranch project should not prove unduly burdensome on the Garfield County's service provision system. The project site is immediately adjacent to County Road 109, and the developer will participate financially in improving this roadway through road impact fees. Because all onsite streets will be maintained by the homeowners association, county snow removal and maintenance costs will be minimal The Rose Ranch environs are already patrolled by the county sheriff; thus incrementai patrol and protection cost will not be greatly in excess of current standards. The majority of indirect county services, such as the clerk and recorder, administration and library wi-[ see cost increases roughly in proportion with the project's new popuiation growth. Garfield County, like all other Colorado counties, draws upon a number of revenue sources to support its expenditures-property, sales and other taxes, service fees, revenue transfers from the state and federal governments, and state and federal grants. In determining Rose Ranch's impact on Garfield County expenditures, BBC was careful to include only expenditures that are supported by local taxpayers. When observers question whether a proposed development will pay its own way, they are really asking whether the local taxes generated by the project will cover the locaiiy supported expenses. In order to address that question, BBC excluded expenditures that are funded by user fees, intergovemmental transfers or grants from the analysis. BBC determined that $10.5 milli6n of 1998 Garfield County budgeted expenditures are supported by locai taxes. Dividing these expenses by the 13,830 households in the county produces an annual cost per household of $762. This is the average cost within the county, and the figure employed in this analysis. This charge may be high because it does not reflect any economies of scale nor any of the moderating influences discussed above. At build-out, there will be 292 new households in the Rose Ranch development. At current local cost rates, these households will require almost $223,000 in annual county expenditures (Exhibit 6). This total is lower than the $320,000 of sales and property tax revenues that the project will generate. Therefore, the Rose Ranch development will generate a nearly $100,000 annual surpius for the Garfield County goverrunent. These findings are surunarized in Exhibit 7. \t Exhibit 2. Assumptions For Rose Ranch Residential Development General Model Assumptions Assessed Valuation Factor for Residential Real Estate Garfield County Mill Levy Total residential units to be built Housing Units Single Family Homes (1 to 1.5 acre lots) Estimated number of units for sale Estlmated average sales price per unit Sin(le Family Homes (l/2lo 3/4 acre lots) Estimated number of units for sale Estlmated average sales prlce per unit Sin(le Family Homes (f3 acre lots) Estimated number of units for sale Estlmated average sales price per unit Single Family Homes (9,000 square foot !ots) Estimated number of units for sale Estlmated average sales price per unit Duplexes Estimated number of units for sale Estlmated average sales price per unit CIub Homes Estimated number of units for sale Estimated average sales price per unit 8.OO% 13.655 292 20 $1,125,0OO 50 $583,333 a7 $55O,OOO t4 $43O,OOO 74 s375,oOO 47 s350,000 To comply with the Gallagher Amendment, the residential assessment factor will continue to decline. From 1997 property tax levies Rose Ranch Financial Projections Rose Ranch Financial Projections Assumes $675,000 average lot @ 60% of sales price Rose Ranch Financlal Projections Assumes $35O,O00 average lot @ 60% of sales prlce Rose Ranch Financial Projections Assumes $275,000 average lot @ 50% of sales price Rose Ranch Financial Projections Assumes $215,000 average lot @ 50% of sales price Rose Ranch Financial Projections Assumes $15O,O00 average lot @ 40% of sales price Rose Ranch Financlal Projections Assumes $140,000 average lot @ 40% of sales price Note: All values are in 1998 dollars. Source: BBC Research & Consulting from data provided by Roaring Fork lnvestments, LLC. I I I I I I I I I I r I I I I I I I I Exhibit 3. Rose Ranch Property Tax Revenue Proiections At Build-Out Cumulative Projected Construction Single Family Homes - 1 to 1.5 acre lots Slngle Famlly Homes - t/2 to 3/4 acre lots Single Famlly Homes - 1,/3 acre lots Slngle Famlly Homes - 9,000 square foot lots Duplexes/Townhomes Club Homes Projocted Market Value of Proiect Gomponents Golf Course and Club House Slngle Family Homes - 1to 1.5 acre lots Slngle Family Homes - 1,/2 to 3/4 acre lots Slngle Family Homes - 1,/3 acre lots Slngle Famlly Homes - 9,000 square foot lots Duplexes/Townhomes Club Homes Residential Development Subtotal Assessed Value of Real Estato For Property Taxes Residential Property - with assessment factor of Other Property - with assessment facto. of fotal Assessed Value for Property Taxes Annual Gounty Proporty fax Revenues with mill levy of 20 50 a7 t4 74 47 $13,323,767 $ 22,500,000 29,166,667 47,850,000 6,020,000 27,750,000 16,450,000 149,736,667 8.007o $ 11,978,933 29.OOo/o $ 3,863,892 $ 15,E42,826 13.6550 $ Note: All values are in 1998 dollals' Source: BBC Research & ConsultinS from Garfield County data and Roaring Fork lnvestme:nts, LLC data. 216,334 I I I I I I I I I I I Exhibit 5. Summary of 1998 Garfield Gounty Tax Supported Expenditures Garfietd Gounty Household Population (1) I I I I I I I I Total Households, 1998 13,830 of Allocated 1998 fax 1998 BudEloted Gounty Expenditures (2) Percentagle of Expenditures Supported By Local Taxes (3) General Fund Social Services Fund Road and Bridge Fund Library Fund Capital Expenditures Fund Retirement Fund Public Works Fund Oil and Gas lmpact Fund Total 10,006,323 5,275,400 6,522,27L 891,962 2,468,359 568,671 L,269,76L L49,562 46o/0 LOo/o 7-7o/o 86% 77o/o 29o/o lOOo/o LOOo/o 27,752,309 10,532,620 762 (1) Household populalion ba3ed on Pcsnsus eslimaies and proieclions from Equitax Nalional Decision Svstems. (2)Alliund bud66t llgur6 ba*d on 199a Garileld Countv budget. Gene.al Fud rotal 3hdn oxclude transte6 to olher lund.. The Alrpon .nd Solld Wasle tlnds aG 4cluded becau* the$ are e.tetp se funds supPoned b, user ie6 and 6E.ls. Tho Cons.wario. Trusl Fund Ir excluded bocalse ll ls llnan!€d lrom transfe6 ol slato lottery reelpt8. (3)Ih6 sudlted 1996 Ga.lleld county llnanclal stabmenl. were used to detefilne local td support tot.ach rrnd' 1998 fax-Supported Tax-Supported Expenditures Per HousoholdExponditures 38 80 55 138 t2 92 LL