Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication-PermitI Garfield County Building & Planning Department 108 8th Street, Suite #401 Glenwood Springs, Co. 81601 Office:970·945-8212 Fax: 970-384-3470 Inspection Line: 970·384-5003 Building Permit No. l/202 Parcel No: 2391-321-02-045 -·· ~· --· ·----·- Locality: Job Address: ~--··---~-~---~0~1 ~-2 Larkspur Dr.,_Carbonc!~--__ --~ Use of Building: . Owner: -~----·~-----~Hc.:.:offman, Michael ~~oan ______ _ Contractor: Owner Fees: Plan Check: $ ___ 1 ,916_:3()_ Septic: ---··~- Bldg Permit: _L ____ 2,948.15 Other Fees: ~-~~~-----~· Total Fees: $ 4,864.45 Clerk: QJli11lJ{J~ Date: Jf-5/M . . c ___ o ----I GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPUCATION 108 8• Stree~ Suite 401, Glenwood Springs, Co 81601 Phone: 970-945-8212/ Fax: 970-384-3470 I Inspection Line: 970-384-5003 v.lvvw.garfield-county.com ~· This application for a Building Permit must be signed by the Owner of the property, described above, or an authorized agent. If the signature below is not that of !he OWner, a separate letter of authority, signed by the Owner, must be provided with this Application. Legal A(ffl~S. A Building Permit cannot be issued without proof of legal and adequate access to the property for purposes ofinspections by the Building Department. Other Pcnnits. Multiple separate pennits may be required: (1) State Electrical Permit, (2) County ISDS Penni!, (3) another permit required for use on the property identified above, e.g. State or County Highway/ Road Access or a State Wastewater Discharge Permit Void Permit. A Building Pennit becomes null and void if the work authorized is not commenced within 180 days of the date of issuance and if work is suspended or abandoned for a period of ISO days after commencement. CERTIFICATION I hereby certifY that I have read this Application and that the infonnation contained above is true and correct. I understand that the Building Department accepts the Applicalion, along with the plans and specifications and other data submitted by me or on my behalf(subminals), based upon my certification as to accuracy. Assuming completCJICSS of the submiUals and approval of this Application, a Bnilding Pennit will be issued granling pennission to me, as Owner, to construct !he structure(s) and titcilities de!ailed on the submittals reviewed by the Building Department. In consideration of the issuance of the Building Pennit, 1 agree that I and my ;1gents will comply with provisions of any federal, state or local law regulating the work and the Garfield Co1mty Building Code, ISDS regulations and applicable land use regulations (County Regulalion(s)). I acknowledge that the Building Pennit may be suspended or revoked, upon notice from the County, if the location. construction or use of the stmcture(s) and facility(ies), described above, are not in compliance with County Regulatiou(s) or any other applicable law. I hereby grant permission to the Building Department to enter the property, described above, to inspect the work. I further acknowledge that the issuance of the Building Permit does not prevent the Building Official from: requiring the correction of errors in the submitlals, if any, discovered after issuance; or (2) stopping construction or usc ofthe struclure(s) or fucility(ies) if such is in violation ~~fCO~un~~~~\;Ji~]~~~~~~·~~t~~~~;;:;;:;~~~~~:::::::;:=::::~:: Review not constitute an acceptance of responsibility or liability by the County of errors, omissions local laws and County Regulations rest with me and 1ny authorized agents, including without STAFF USE ONLY rt<>~-r-e: (()I (\Y\ m· V'fOJI SpeciaiCon~itions.: "Scr.?.eC(\ct> QA\<Dc;&c' ~~ \M \-\rvts, fSp~ \\ ~()~. ~0.!2QC2,c '!\JeW Pr\tVVI 1--t, \0 -,V .. {';:) ~ Adjusted Valuation; Plan Check Fee: z~tB Manu home Fee: Mise Fees: 446021.~ 1<1;~(p /30 • tS ISDSFee: Total Fees: Fees Paid: q ~ Balance Due: BP No & Issue Date: ISDS No & Issued Date: 4e&f,-t£ \)I;Lo)(.' '2.~5A? I /20 2. 1/5/ O'J Setbacks: OCCGroup: ConstType: Zoning: ~PT: ~~ ~ APPR~-~TE 1/£/o:y liDEPT: ~~ • ~~\Yt\}\1 AP RO AL '-\ DATE ~15/.q The following items are required by Garfield County for a final Inspection: 1) A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector. 2) Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department and posted at the structure and where readily visible from access road. 3) A finished roof; a lockable building; completed exterior siding; exterior doors and windows installed; a complete kitchen with cabinets, sink with hot & cold running water, non-absorbent kitchen floor covering, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove and refrigerator; all necessary plumbing. 4) All bathrooms must be complete, with washbowl, tub or shower, toilet, hot and cold running water, non-absorbent floors, walls finished, and privacy door. 5) Steps over three (3) risers, outside or inside must be must have handrails. Balconies and decks over 30" high must be constructed to alllBC and IRC requirements including guardrails. 6) Outside grading completed so that water slopes away from the building; 7) Exceptions to the outside steps, decks, grading may be made upon the demonstration of extenuating circumstances., i.e. weather. Under such circumstances A Certificate of Occupancy may be issued conditionally. 8) A final inspection sign off by the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department for driveway installation, where applicable; as well as any final sign off by the Fire District, and/or State Agencies where applicable. A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (C.O.) WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. A C.O. MAY TAKE UP TO 5 BUSINESS DAYS TO BE PROCESSED AND ISSUED. OWNER CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A C.O. IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATING PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET. I understand and agree to abide by the above conditions for occupancy, use and the issuance of a C.O. for the building identified in the Building Permit. ~!Pd{L DATE VALUATION FEE DETERMINATION Applicant Address Date .;:M:;::i:::chae=l~H.!:o::!ffin=an!!!-_______ Subdivision ~~~---------------LoUBiock _,1;:,:15::,:.12,0"'0:::;9 ______________ Contractor Finished (Livable Area): Main Upper Lower Other Total Basement: Unfinished Square Feet Valuation Conversion ofUnfinished to Finished Total Valuation Garage: Carport: Total Valuation Crawl Space Total Valuation Decks/ Patios Total Covered Open Valuation Type of Construction: Occupancy: Valuation Total Valuation 3047 sq.lt 1991 sq.lt sq.lt sq.ft X $7 4.68 5038 sq.lt sq.ft X $41.00 sq.lt X $33.68 1913 sq.ltX $18.00 sq.ft X $12.00 2750 sq.ft X $9.00 145 sq.ft X $24.00 760 sq.ltX $12.00 Commercial sf X sf X sf X sf X sf X sf X Cerise Ranch Lot 45, Phase II 376,237.84 0.00 34,434.00 24,750.00 12,600.00 0.00 448,021.84 VALUATION/FEE DETERMINATION Applicant __________ _ Address. __________ _ Date ___________ _ Basement: Total Square Feet Valuation Unfinished Conversion of Unfinished to Finished Plan Check Fee for Conversion Valuation m~ v<i(~~ation Crawl S,ce: '2.7f;(J Valuation Decks/Patios: Coyered 145'1' Valuation Open 7fdJ~ Valuation Total Valuation Subdivision Lot/Block Contractor December 19, 2008 Joan & Michael Hoffman 0145 Cheyenne Avenue Carbondale, CO 81623 Re: Building Permi~ Lot 45; Cerise Ranch Joan & Michael, Garfield County BUILDING & PLANNING DEPARTMENT After a preliminary review of your most recent submittal we have found several items that need to be addressed before we can issue a Building Permit. The "lowering" of the building has brought it to within the twenty-five foot height limit but has created the following issues: 1. An accurate grading plan needs to be prepared and submitted by a Licensed Engineer for our review. Any .,taining walls/structures (stone or concrete) should be indicated, along with construction details. Relocation of the existing drainage ditch (as identified in the soils report), along with details should also be indicated. 2. Based on the proposed building elevation the footing elevations denoted on the structural drawings far exceed the maximum depth recommended in the soils report (i.e. four feet below existing grade). 3. Where the final grade exceeds the top of the foundation wall(s), provide revised foundation elevations and details which are coordinated with, and reflective of the revised grading plan. Before we can further review your application, we will need an Engineered Drainage/Grading Plan and Details and revised Foundation Plan and Details (for both the house and detached garage) If you should have any questions, feel free to call me. Respectfully, ~~\~'tr~s Examiner 108 Eighth Street, Suite 401 • Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 (970) 945-8212 • (970) 285-7972 • Fax: (970) 384-3470 December 19, 2008 Joan & Michael Hoffman 0145 Cheyenne Avenue Carbondale, CO 81623 Re: Building Permit, Lot 45; Cerise Ranch Joan & Michael, Garfield County BUILDING & PLANNING DEPARTMENT After a preliminary review of your most recent submittal we have found several items that need to be addressed before we can issue a Building Permit. The "lowering" of the building has brought it to within the twenty-five foot height limit but has created the following issues: 1. An accurate grading plan needs to be prepared and submitted by a Licensed Engineer for our review. Any 1\!!ltaining walls/structures (stone or concrete) should be indicated, along with construction details. Relocation of the existing drainage ditch (as identified in the soils report), along with details should also be indicated. 2. Based on the proposed building elevation the footing elevations denoted on the structural drawings far exceed the maximum depth recommended in the soils report (i.e. four feet below existing grade). 3. Where the final grade exceeds the top of the foundation wall(s), provide revised foundation elevations and details which are coordinated with, and reflective of the revised grading plan. Before we can further review your application, we will need an Engineered Drainage/Grading Plan and Details and revised Foundation Plan and Details (for both the house and detached garage) If you should have any questions, feel free to call me. Respectfully, ~~\~~~s Examiner 108 Eighth Street, Suite 401 • Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 (970) 945-8212 • (970) 285-7972 • Fax: (970) 384-3470 GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING 970-945-8212 MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS For SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING CONSTRUCTION Including NEW CONSTRUCTION ADDITIONS ALTERATIONS And MOVED BUILDINGS In order to understand the scope of the work intended under a permit application and expedite the issuance of a permit it is important that complete information be provided. When reviewing a plan and it's discovered that required information has not been provided by the applicant, this will result in the delay of the permit issuance and in proceeding with building construction. The owner or contractor shall be required to provide this information before the plan review can proceed. Other plans that are in line for review may be given attention before the new information may be reviewed after it has been provided to the Building Department. TWO (2) SETS OF CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS & TWO (2) SITE PLANS MUST BE SUBMITTEDFOR ALL APPLICATIONS. Please review this document to determine if you have enough information to design your project and provide adequate information to facilitate a plan review. Also, please consider using a design professional for assistance in your design and a construction professional for construction of your project. Any project with more than ten (10) occupants requires the plans to be sealed by a Colorado Registered Design Professional. To provide for a more understandable plan in order to determine compliance with the building, plumbing and mechanical codes, applicants are requested to review the following checklist prior to and during design. Applicants are required to indicate appropriately and to submit the completed checklist at time of application for a permit. Plans to be included for a Building Permit, must be on drafting paper at least 18"x24" and drawn to scale. 1 Plans must include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations all sides with decks, balcony, steps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the finish grade line and original grade. A section showing in detail, from the bottom of the footing to the top of the roof, including re-bar, anchor bolts, pressure treated plates, floor joists, wall studs and spacing, insulation, sheeting, house-rap, (which is required), siding or any approved building material. Engineered foundations may be required. A window schedule. A door schedule. A floor framing plan, a roof framing plan, roof must be designed to withstand a 40 pound per square foot up to 7,000 feet in elevation, a 90 M.P.H. wind speed, wind exposure B or C, and a 36 inch frost depth. All sheets to be identified by number and indexed. All of the above requirements must be met or your plans will be returned. All plans submitted must be incompliance with the 2003 IRC. I. Is a site plan included that identifies the location of the proposed structure or addition and distances to the property lines from each corner of the proposed structure(s) prepared by a licensed surveyor and has the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing? Properties with slopes of 30% or greater must be shown on the site plan. (NOTE Section: 106.2) Any site plan for the placement of any portion of a structure within 50 ft. of a property line and not within a previously surveyed building envelope on a subdivision final plat shall be prepared by a licensed surveyor and have the surveyor's signature and professional stamp on the drawing. Any structure to be built within a building envelope of a lot shown on a recorded subdivision plat shall include a copy of the building envelope as it is shown on the final plat with the proposed structure located within the[nvelope. Yes (hI 2. Does the site plan also include any other buildings on the property, setback easements and utility easements? Please refer to Section 5.05.03 in the Garfield County Zoning Resolution if the property you are applying for a building permit on is located on a corner lot. Special setbacks do apply. d-= Yes fot· 3. Does the site plan include when applicable the location of the I.S.D.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System) and the distances to the property lines, wells (on subject property and adjacent ~~~ertwtreams or water courses? 4. Does the site plan indicate the location and direction of the County or private road accessing the ~~~erty? /ld /j I 2 5. Are you aware that prior to submittal of a building permit application you are required to show proof of a legal and adequate access to the site? This may include (but is not limited to) proof of your right to use a private easement/right of way; A County Road and Bridge permit; a Colorado Dept. of Highway Permit, including a Notice to Proceed; a permit from the federal government or any combination. You can contact the Road & Bridge Department at 625-860 I. See phone book for other agenclt Yes /11 6. Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all reinforcing steel in accorda/t with the IRC or per stamped engineered design? Yes P4 7. Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl spaces and the clearances requiredbetween "':m4~nd earth? , Yes ·· No }'//If:.· C. fG<.vL S?c..ce_ ~c._,,_ Oua--"G,o<.:r$.·ck • 8. Do the plans indicate the size and lo~af of ventilation openings for the attic, roof joist spaces and soffits? IJ/J . Yes No~/-LF/~'----- 9. Do the plans include design loads as required by Garfield County for roof snow loads, (a minimum of 40 pounds per square foot up to & including 7,000 feet above sea level), floor loads and wind ~=~s? M I 0. Does the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor, and roof ~~struci§;- 11. Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists, wall studs, ceiling joists, roof rafterswr j9ists or trusses? Yes fll /1' ' 12. Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method of positive connection of all ~o~:mn/1!/lams? 13. Does the elevation plan indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the undisturbed grade to the midpoint between the ridge and eave of a gable or shed roof or the top ~e~ flatnBuilding height measurement usually not to exceed 25 feet) 14. Does the plan include any stove or zero clearance fireplace planned for installation including make and model and Colorado P&Ilcertifications or phase II EPA certification? Yes No :hf 3 15. Does the plan include a mason Ire lace including a fireplace section indicating design to comply ~~;_t_h_e _rR_c_? __ No--=LLL-""(!1-'-"--- 16. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that egress/rescue windows from ~::piW}:s and/or basements comply with the requirements of the IRC? 17. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that windows provide natural light and ~ee~til~r all habitable rooms? 18. Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass doors, glazing immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as a walking surface; sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub enclosures and specifY safety glazin~ )l}ese areas? Yes ~~ No ____________ __ 19. Is the location o all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces, boilers and water heaters indicated on tyhe plan? 1J 1/ I-fwl'l"-"'"--·r"-C..~'- es (7-· -<...,-r ) -1-v..t ""'-<·"'-"]:::"-,, T'T) c._.. 20. Do you understand that if you are building on a parcel of land created by the exemption process or the ~:sdiv-ess, are building plans in compliance with all plat notes and/or covenants? 21. Do you understand that if you belong to a Homeowners Association (HOA), it is your responsibility to obtain written permission from the association, if required by that association, prior to submitting an application for a building permit? The building permit application will be accepted without it, but you run the risk of the HOA bringing action to enforce the covenants, which can result in revocation of permit issued. Additionally, your Plan Review fee is not refundable if the plans have been reviewed by the Building Department prior to any action by the HOA that requires either revMnp; substantial modification of the plans. Yes ~ 22. Will this bn~finly residential structure on the parcel? Yes~ If no-Explain: _______ _ 23. Hav~ :o~~lete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the application? 24. Do~~~ u~ that the minimum dimension a home can be on a lot is 20ft. wide and 20ft. long? ' 4 25. Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other construction code ~~/??? 26. Do your plans comply with all zoning rules and regulations in the County related to your properties ~e~en 27. Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a final inspection by thef1H!i\¥d County Building Department? Yesz~.a....!Z.---- 28. Do you understand that approval for design and/or construction changes are required prior to the ~!li#these changes? 29. Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a "Plan Review" fee from you at the time of application submittal and that you will be required to pay the "Permit Fee" as well as any ~~ad~" or "Septic System" fees required, at the time you pick up your building permit? 30. Are you aware that you must call in for au inspection by 3:30 the business day before the requested inspection in order to receive it the following business day? Inspections will be made from 7:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. Monday through Friday. Inspections are to be called in to384-~M- Yes,l~ ~ No __________ __ 31. Are you aware that requesting inspections on work that is not ready or not accessible will result in a $50.00 *inspection fee? Yes ;J ,!/ 32. Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the IRC including approval on a final inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy and occupancy of the t~~~~ 33. Are you aware that the Permit Application must be signed by the Owner or a written authority being ~~:n :~»-ent and that the party responsible for the project must comply with the IRC? 5 34. Do you understand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed Electrician and Plumber to perform installations and hookups, unless you as the homeowner are performing the work? The license number of the person performing the work will be required at time of i'~lic~ion. 35. Are you aware, that on the front of the Building Permit Application you will need to fill in the Parcel/Schedule Number for the lot you are applying for this permit on prior to submittal of a ~~!div application? Your attention in this is appreciated. 36. Do you know that the local fire district may require you to submit plans for their review of fire safety Y isseuses.?}1;U // -+.-L'LL,.L,/L<L ___ (please check with the building department about this requirement) 37. Do you understand that if you are planning on doing any excavating or grading to the property prior ~ e~~ a building permit that you will be required to obtain a grading permit? 38. Are you aware that if you will be connecting to a public water and/or sewer system, that the tap fees have to be paid and the connections inspected by the service provider prior to the issuance of a Certific?f_?fOccupancy? Yes ~·"'up:::_~,c:.--- I hereby acknowl ge that I have read, understand and answered these questions to the best of my a ility. ~ _:L-);2/J oC Signature of Owner Date Phone: 726··3/9-Jf.Y9 (days); 9/o -7fi?-7gos (evenings) ProjectName: /d;rrn?A!V 12,£5//.)etVC!$ Project Address: 0/9c;< L/'1-rks_t:Ja----r 7;;;;rr ~. _"l!:-8!2-61/V~ {1; ~ 7 6 UIL IN GARIFIIELD COUNTY, COLORADO INSPECTION W!LL NOT BE MADE UNLESS THIS CARD IS POSiED ON THE JOB Date Issued _L5-f)__q"'----------Permit No. IIZDZ AGREEMENT In consideration of the issuance of the permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with all laws and regulations related to the zoning, location; co.nstruction and erection of the proposed structured for which this permit is granted, and further agrees that if the above said regulations are not fully complied with in the zoning, location, erection and construction of the above described structu1·e, the permit may then be revoked by notice from the County Building department and IMMEDIATELY BECOME NULL AND VOID. UsesJLon_CrWsp. wf~h q.COvet£!LfXk+i os "*'~0 Address or Legal DescriptionQlfll.a \.a.r~y 'Qr. C-at~e;'""------ Owner~aMichael Contractor owner ____ _ Building Permit Type ~-'d"'-'f.._OO._..-'-"'' oJ.""""------·------------------- This Card Must Be Posted So It Is Plainly Visible From The Street Until Final Inspection INSPECTION RECORD Footing Driveway j;j£<ffi_~~ ~--7£- ,ot"""z- FoundationVf Grouting Insulation 1-/9-c?'l ~-/ /-;:).g'-09977A 7'='.?<.0 Of' {j Underground Plumbing Drywall ) ~ 1718 ~;N?-&'?'f?/?"-'i-~7rp--- . Rough Plumbing Electric Final (by Stale Inspector~ rrAJ.A.<-f'O>i>--~v>-E-GP't!Ul-..:L (,-;;<?o9 {Priol' to Final) 0 f::-;7-t::-{ i ( 3 (f 0 Rough Mechanical Septic Final ' 7-7·c<f~ AL Gas Piping FINAL k // -/(') ~???~ h-:;.< ( ~9 ':f7?2- Electric Rou;;~ 54nspector) {You Must Call For Final h1Spection} (1/1 !lt (!('__.-t -;1_-(';/j Notes q _;). 3 -oCJ A ,, -?;;~ve-~ (Prior to Framing) Framing 7-7-<>'1~ ~ o.r. (to Include Roof in place & Windows & Doors installed & Firestopping in place} THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE For Inspection Call970-384-5003 Office 970-945-8212 108 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 DO NOT DESTROY THIS CARD January 9, 2009 Joan & Michael Hoffman 0145 Cheyenne Avenue Carbondale, CO 81623 Subject: Excavation Observation Hoffman Residence Lot 45, Cerise Ranch Garfield County, Colorado Project No. GS04664-305 T CTLITHOMPSON We visited the subject site on January 9, 2009. The purpose of our site visit was to observe the soils exposed at footing elevations and opine on the suitability of the exposed soils for support of footings. We observed that large boulders were found at footing locations in two areas. The footing formwork was constructed with the boulders in place. We believe it is appropriate to construct the footing incorporating the boulders as part of the foundation. Removal <>fa boulder at the bottom of the excavation exposed soft, wet soils in the vicinity of the foundation. We recommended that the contractor crowd 1- 1/2 inch diameter rock into the area of soft soil to stabilize the soil. During our site visit, we observed that the contractor had performed the corrective action to our satisfaction. If additional boulders are encountered in the area of the foundation, we recommend that the boulders remain in place and are incorporated into the concrete foundation. We appreciate the opportunity to work with you on this project. If you have questions or we can be of further service, please call. Very Truly Yours CTL I THOMPSON, INC. Edward R. White, P.E. Staff Engineer ERW:JM:cd (5 copies sent) 234 Center Drive. I Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Telephone: 970-945-2809 Fax: 970·945-7 411 580 Main Street, Suite 300 Carhondale,ColOFado• 81623-2065 January 12, 2009 Mike Hoffman 0145 Cheyenne Avenue Carbondale, Colorado 81623 Re: Hoffman Residence Lot 45, Cerise Ranch Subdivision Garfield County, Colorado Dear Mike: (970) 963-9643• Fax (970) 963-0135 wmv .MaggertEngineers.c om On Friday afternoon, January 9, 2009, at your request, myself, along with Steve Millard of our office, conducted a partial footing reinforcement observation at your residence mentioned above. This area was at the east end of the home where the footing will be supporting exterior walls of the workshop, kitchen and the wall in front of the garage. I was told by you, that Matt Provost of the Garfield County building department had performed an inspection that morning, but was not able to complete his service because of reinforcement not being in place where mentioned due to scheduling. In addition, we observed two areas at the south wall of the dining room to have reinforcing steel placed incorrectly. We relayed our findings to the supervisor in charge and observed the addition of the steel to correct the condition prior to our departure. The soil underlying the footing formwork appeared to be undisturbed natural soil, an exception was an area of footing at the kitchen/ porch common wall area. You informed us that a large boulder was excavated from this area and the void filled with compacted gravel under the direction of a representative with the geotechnical firm, CTL Thompson. Footings were formed with 2x dimensional lumber staked vertically at the exterior for support. Rebar size, spacing, lap splices and clearance requirements were in general conformance with the design specifications as shown on document drawings prepared by our office dated December 4, 2007. If you have any questions regarding this observation report, or if we can be of further service, please contact us. Sincerely, PWJ ly.jj ~\a> VI~ Alvin J. Rakowski Project Manager alvin@maggertengineers.com Reviewed By: Kevin A. Wasli, P.E. kevin@maggertengineers.com Dec. 9. 2008 11 :58AM FACSI'MILE DATE: TO: FROM: .No. 0506 P. 1 <:j?C~-'" 1 l1 -t{tH/\----·-----:__ ___ _ QAI\..,JU:1~~ Residential Design Consultttntt 790 PEACHTR.eg !O!D\JSTRlAUOULaVARD, SU!TR200 SUWANEE, GEORGJ>'\30024 PHONE (770) 6!4-3239 +FAX: (770) 6!4-5948 wwv.r.garreHassocia.res.com TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES _ _!_/_ (INCLUDING COVER SHEET) COMMENTS I ADDITiONAL COPIES:------------------ 1D WHOV.\ I 'I"' b'\1\ kY G9 t;;l t-U.A.J: (11-.1 'R,if'U.fN'f ~6 ?t..ii:IJ AJO, 6(..1)~);-n.tt PIMfiV'SlcN 14 "-' ' ';. r~ £. o t z;,-r fu>tl1~ . "tC . nt e M n? f'(>' <A.rr Of 11t.t: fv<.e.H .. t rn e «..oc.P ~;\ lt.£ THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS FACSIMILE IS CONFIDENTIAL AND MAY ALSO BE SUBJECT TO THE A TTORNRY CLIENT PRIVILEGE Ol\ MAY CONSTITUTE PRIVILEGED WORK PRODUCT. The information i• imend~d only for rhe use of the individual or entity m whmn it ts addressed, If you s.u:e not the intended recipient, or tl\e age1'it or employee responsible to deliver it t~ the intended t:ecipient, you at•e hereby notified that any use, dissemination~ disti'ibution or copying of this coo:u.nunic:ation is strictly prohibited. If you have received this facsimile in erro:r, please immediately notify ua by telephone, and ret.utn the original messs.ge tO Ulj at d1e addiess above via the U.S. Postal Service. Thank you. Cerise Ranch PZ"operiy OwneZ"s Association Design Review BoaZ"d Joan & Michael Hoffman 0145 Cheyenne Avenue Carbondale, CO 81623 Re: Lot 45 Final Review (Receipt of Completion Deposit and Tap Fees) December 1, 2008 Receipt of cheek# 510721 drawn on Community Banks of Colorado, Joan & Michael Hoffinan, $15,000.00 payment of Completion Deposit for Lot 45 is hereby acknowledged. Also received is Receipt #1347 from the Mid-Valley Metropolitan District for Tap Fees. Final approval is given for construction at Cerise Ranch on Lot 45, with note of the following conditions existing: Notes: Owner Hoffman is understood to be acting as General Contractor for this construction. DRB may withhold portions of the Completion Deposit as required during construction in order to maintain an orderly worksite and clean roadways to and from same. A silt fence or other erosion control measures will be required downgrade of the excavation to retain soils on the site, and possibly elsewhere on the site as drainages and construction conditions and activity dictate. No foundation plan was included with the fmal submission to DRB, so the foundation plan submitted at preliminary review will be the only approved foundation. The Final Review application submitted had no time frame for construction, and this must be supplied by applicant, now that construction is about to begin. Access via an existing gravel/dirt roadway on Lot 44, if used by applicant to access Lot 45, must be accompanied by written permission from the owner of Lot 44, supplied to DRB administrator. If used to access Lot 45 during construction, revegetation of this access will be required of Lot 45 owner prior to return of Completion Deposit. Administrator Edquist will conduct an on-site meeting with owner and/or builder prior to· breaking ground on this project, to go over the Construction regulations and the siting of materials, sanitary facilities, trash dumpsters, irrigation pumps and tanks, wildlife/vegetation concerns, and any parking considerations. Cc: CRDRB files: CRDRB via email, Joan and Michael Hoffman via email and U.S. mail, December 1, 2008. 510720 :\3:S:~zt.:;:t~_~~a .. :..HL.-::I::®~!-~~1 ····-~~::-(_:_·~~~~...,--!---:-:1.1¥3F%t~i];l,;;;. iil··!ll.~.f!;--~--~ID~~~~~m~~t;j] ! 51072 iS11_ n COMMUNITY BANKS i, 1 r!! 'tiu Ill' C)]c Cm.oKADl) jfl)i fl /l .. ' .. {! 1~1 ·,~, !-()-/ tl,S-~i?JrlY V1Ufl !~' ~~. REMITTER,' MICHAEL & JOAN HOFFMAN nAll' 11/28/08 ':N: I '·'-~ ~~il! ~ I ~rom Q :~~ oRDEI!OF CERISE RANCH POA :{~l it'ji EXACTLY **15, 000 AND 00/100 DOLLARS $ $15, 000.00 :1i THE PURCHASE OF AN lNDEMNJTY BOND WILl BE HEO.UIIiEO BEFORE ANY CASHIER'S CHECK Of THIS SANK Will BE REPlACED OR REFUNDED IN THE EVENT IT IS lOST, MISPLACED OR STOU:N. l~1 n•oooo s l.D 7 2 l.n• •: l.O 2 1.0 20 1o :~•: '18 :11. 7 'i t:.n• ·· i,~ L~~m_,~Y§';_{"XiTw---r.~;t;t'·:m:-;::~"'1~·-·~::_:::..ilit~~~~-t .. ~.J~.:::.::I:E~..t~~~S~F.':~~~~j_i REM I TIER: MICHAEL & JOAN HOFFMAN OAT£ 11/28/08 CERISE RANCH POA EXACTLY **15,000 AND 00/100 DOLLARS CUSTOMER · FilE COPY CASHIER'S CHECK 510721 $ $15,000.00 ------- COMMUNITY BANKS OF COLORADO AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE NOT NI'I:OTin Rl ~ Cerise Ranch Plrope:rrty Owner.; Association Design Review Boa:l'd Joan & Michael Hoffman 0145 Cheyenne Avenue Carbondale, CO 81623 Re: Lot 45 Final Review (Conditional) Cerise Ranch Property Owners Association Design Review Meeting of 9/9/08 September 20, 2008 Present: Applicants Michael (618-3910) and Joan Hoffman (618-3910) (963-9805), DRC members Eric Schmela, Dave Marrs, Ted Borchelt, administrator, Keith Edquist. Submitted: Three sets plans, one in reduced format, dated 8/24/06 and including left, front, right and rear elevations, with front elevation-hand colored in reduced format. Also including first and second level floor plans, building section and fireplace detail, roof plan, first and second floor electrical plans, site plan showing irrigation and drainage, site plan showing utility and construction staging locations, with location of underground irrigation tank, landscape plan and plant key, detached garage plan and elevations. Sample board with photos of materials stained with colors to be used, cladding, stone for siding and porches, roof material, exterior lights etc. along with legend page to tie materials to the elevations. Sample board of lap siding and board and batt to be used on the home. Spec sheets on roof material and exterior lighting proposed for residence. Hand drawn details of chimney cap and of irrigation pump house. No foundation plan was included with this submission, so the foundation plan submitted at preliminary review will be the only approved foundation. Signed but incomplete Final Review application, without time schedule information included Receipt of check# 8648, Joan & Michael Hoffman, $600.00 payment of final review fee is hereby acknowledged. Notes: Noted also, is that the roof pitch on the residence exceeds the allowable 12/12 pitch in many locations. DRB executed a Variance for this residence in this regard at this meeting. Irrigation plan does not indicate irrigation types (rotor, pop-ups, drip). Applicant indicates all will be used to irrigate landscape. Applicant indicates 11,700 square feet of irrigated area between native areas and sod. Note that only 500 square feet of this could be watered with potable water, as this lot has access to ditch water. Plans also show a 16 inch culvert at the driveway location. As a point of information, there are areas within the Larkspur Drive right of way which will not drain prpperly. You should be aware that the POA retains and reserves the right to correct the drainage flow in the right of way and that improvements therein may be disturbed in the course of such work. Some of the roadside improvements you have Cerise Ranch Properly OwnelrS Association Design Review Boa~rd placed during construction lie within the right of way. The Larkspur Drive right of way is 56 feet in width, 12 feet of asphalt with a 6 foot shoulder and 10 foot ditch on each side of center line. Applicant states that the berm at the far east property line shown in preliminary review has now been eliminated. No landscape lighting is proposed, except that at the entry monument and pathway lighting to the entry. A silt fence or other erosion control measures may be required downgrade of the excavation to retain soils on the site, or elsewhere on the site as drainages and construction conditions and activity dictate. Final approval is withheld conditional upon receipt of a $15,000 Construction Completion Deposit, and a receipt for tap fees. Your check should be made for the Completion Deposit to the order of"Cerise Ranch Property Owners Association, or CRPOA. Excavation and construction on site may not take place prior to receipt of the Completion Deposit. Administrator Edquist will conduct an on-site meeting with owner and/or builder prior to breaking ground on this project, to go over the Construction regulations and the siting of materials, sanitary facilities, trash dumpsters, irrigation pumps and tanks, wildlife/vegetation concerns, and any parking considerations. Sincerely, Cerise Ranch Design Review Board Keith Edquist, administrator Cc: CRDRB files: CRDRB via email, Joan and Michael Hoffman via email and U. S. mail, September 22, 2008. (Sent by US Mail and email as above on I J/6/08) ROOM MASTER BEDROOM MASTER BATH MASTER CLOSET LIBRARY POWDER ROOM GARAGE PANTRY UNDER STAIRS PORCH WORKSHOP BED#2 BATH#2 BED #2 CLOSET BED#3 BATH#3214 BED #3 CLOSET BED#4 BATH#4 BED #4 CLOSET BONUS ROOM ATTIC Hoffman Residence Lot 45 Cerise Ranch DOOR SIZE ALL DOOR 8' TALL 2-216 2-2/6 216 2-216 214 218 9LT 210 310 218 2-416 X 8' 218 214 214 218 214 214 218 214 214 2-210 2/8 CkJCJie Qeated By: Mke R:se Errail: rrike@'oaingfai<blilding.com 01 Eiehaf Of. R:Jaring Fcrl< Building Specialties Address: 40 Sunset Di\e SUite #12 Basalt, 00 81621 us PhCl1e: 970-927-9847 Alternate: CT000312 Fax: 970-927-9841 CkJCJie Oeated For: Bill To: Mke & Joan HJfli 1 a 1 ,US • WINDOWS & DOORS • SQDJR(X)()116D 1-bffrrnn Rev tf!2. www.kolbe-kolbe.com Thursday, l\k:M3rrber 13, 2008 Rinted By: Rlse, Mke Oeate:l: Tuesday, N:Jverrber 04. 2008 A"oCI.de Versirn: 5.20.6829 (081106) Mxlifl€d: Tuesday, N:Jverrber 04, 2008 5:13:21 FM 1/ \I 'I\ I lL ! ' . --· Flinted: ~. ~ 13, 2008] RoughOpeningsSchedt.Je Scale: 1/4" = 1' (OJ!side 'vf€>10 001 1 Dining Room MJI Wrdc:MsiDoors Q.lantity: 1 Rough Opening: 70-1/2" x 72-112" \Box I Fr.mne Size: 70" x 72" Unil: Dimension: 70" x 72" --------------------------------------------- Rinted By. R:>se, Mke Oeated: Tuesday, f\bteni:le.-04, 2008 Scale: 1/4'' = 1' (OJ!side 'vf€>10 002 2 Laundry Ulra Caserrert Wrdow (W14) Q.lantity: 1 R01.1gh Opening: 24-1/2" x 48-1/2" \Box I Frame Size: 24" x 48" Unil: Dimension: 24" x 48" Scale: 1/4'' = 1' (Outside 'vf€>10 003 3Garage MJI V\4 rd0\1\.61Doors Q.lantity: 1 Rough Opening: 97" x 91" \Box/Fr.mneSize: 96-112"x00-7/16" Unil: Dimension: 00..1/2" x 90-7/16" RJugh QJerings Rlge 1 of 15 M:rlfied:Tuesday, f\bteni:le.-04, 20085:13:21 FM r' ·------~------~------·---------L (SCDJRXXJ_116D) H:tfrran Fell #2 Rlaing R>l< EU!ding Specialies --- Rlnted By: Rlse, Mke Oealed: Tuesday, l'bverrber 04, 2008 RoughOpeningsSchedt.E Scae: 1/4'' = 1' (OJ!side ViEMI) 004 4Garage Stetiirg Doltlle H..rgWrdcm(2426-1) QJantity: 1 Rough Clpening: 30" x 61" Box/ Frame Size: 29-1/2" x 00-7/16'' Unit Dimension: 29-1/2" x 00-7/16" Scae: 1/4'' = 1' (Oltside ViEMI) 005 5Garage Stetiirg Doltlle H..rg Wrdcm(2426-1) QJantity: 1 Rough Clpening: 30" x 61" Box I Frame Size: 29-1/2" x 00-7/16" Unit Dimension: 29-1/2" x 00-7/16" Scae: 1/4'' = 1' (Oltside ViEMI) 006 6Garage Stetiirg Doltlle H..rg Wrdcm(2426-1) QJantity: 1 Rough Clpening: 30" x 61" Box/Frame Size: 29-1/2"x00-7/16" Unit Dimension: 29-1/2" x 00-7/16" R:>Jgh Q>erings Rge 2 r:ll15 Mldified: Tuesday, l'bverrber 04, 2008 5:13:21 FM Ainted By: R:se, Mke Oeated: Tuesday, N:Nerrber 04, 2008 --------, ___ Ai_nted_:_llusday, N.::werrber13, 20081 Rough OpeningsSchedaje Scale: 1/4'' = 1' (ruside VIew) 007 7Garage Ste!lirg Dotble 1-lrg Wn::k:m (2426-1) Q.lantity: 1 Rough Opening: 30" x 61" Box/ Frame Size: 29-1/2" x 00-7/16" Unit 1Jimensi011: 29-1/2" x 00-7/16" Scale: 1/4' = 1' (OJI:side VIew) 008 8 Kitchen Door Eld:erior SWrgirg Door (3080) Q.lantity: 1 Rough Opening: 38-1/8" x 00-7/32" Box I Frame Size: 37 -5/8" x 98-23132" Unit Dimension: 37-5/8" x 98-23132" Scale: 1/4'' = 1' (OJtside VIew) 009 9 Vlbrkshop Eld:erior SWrgirg Door (6080) Q.lantity: 1 R01.1gh Opening: 74-11/16" x 00-7/32" Box I Frame Size: 74-3/16"' x 98-23132" Unit Dimension: 7 4-3/16" x 98-23132" Rlugh C):Erirgs Rge3cf 15 Mxlfled: Tuesday, N.::werrber 04, 2008 5:13:21 RIA r----------------L (SCOJRXJ0116D) 1-bffrran Rlv 112 __ ~; -By:-... Mke ~.. created: Tuesday, N>verrber 04, 2008 ---- ----~Thursday, N>verrber 13, 2008 j RoughOpeningsSchedl.E Scale: 1/4'' = 1' (QJ!side View) 010 10 Bl eald'ast Utra Caserrert Wn::blv (W156) QJanlity: 1 Rough Q::!ening: 24-1/2" x 66-1/2" Box I Frame Size: 24" x 00" Unit Dimension: 24" x 66" Scale: 1/4'' = 1' (Oltside View) 011 11 Bn!akfast Utra Caserrert/Awirg Pidlre Wn::blv (N356P) QJanlity: 1 Rough Q::!ening: 00.1/2" x 66-1/2" Box I Frame Size: 00" x 00" Unit Dimension: 00" x 00'' Scale: 1/4'' = 1' (Oltside View) 012 12 Bleald'ast Utra Caserrert Wn::blv(W156) QJanlity: 1 Rough Q::!ening: 24-1/2" x 66-1/2" Box I Frame Size: 24" x 00" Unit Dimension: 24" x 00" R:ugh QJerings Rlge4 d 15 Mx:lified: Tuesday, l'>bverrber 04, 2008 5:13:21 FM !!:t!JI Ainted By: R:lse, Ml<e ~.. o-eated: Tuesday, N:wen1Jer04, 2008 RoughOpeningsSchedt.de Scale: 1/4" = 1' (OJtside View) 013 13 Breakfast/Uving Door Exteri<r 8\Mrgirg Door (3080) QJantity: 1 Rough Opening: 38-1/8" x fJB-7132" Box I Frame Size: 37 -5/8" x 9S..23132" Unit DimensiOI'I: 37 -5/8" x 9s..23/32" Scale: 1/4'' = 1' (Ctiside View) 014 14 Uving Room Utra Caserrert Vl.4rdow(N16) QJantity: 1 Rough Opening: 20-112" x 72-112" Box I Franne Size: 20" x 72" Unit Dimension: 20" x 72" Scale: 1/4'' = 1' (Ctiside View) 015 15 Uving Room Utra CaserrertVI.4rdow(N16) QJantity: 1 Rough Opening: 20-1/2" x 72-112" Box I Franne Size: 20" x 72" Unit DimensiOI'I: 20" x 7'2." Fb.lgh q,aings Fbge 5 of 15 M:x:ified: Tuesday, N:wen1:>er04, 20085:13:21 FM i!J[t~ Rinted By: Rlse, Mke IIIJi', O"ealed: Tuesday, N:werrber 04, 2008 RoughOpeningsSchedi.E Scale: 1/4!' = 1' (OJ!side Vi€MI) 016 16 Uving Room Ulra Caserrert Wrdovv (N16) Q.lanlity: 1 R01.1gh Opening: 2()..1/2" x 72-112" Box I Frame Size: 20" x 72" Unit Dimension: 20" x 72" Scale: 1/4!' = 1' (D..ttside Vi€MI) 017 17 Uving Room Ulra Caserrert Wrdovv (N16) Q.lanlity: 1 R01.1gh Opening: 20-1/2" x 72-112" Box I Frame Size: 20" x 72" Unit Dimension: 20" x 72" Scale: 1/4!' = 1' (OJ!side Vi€MI) 018 18 Uving Room Ulra CaserrertWrdovv(N16) Q.lanlity: 1 R01.1gh Opening: 2()..1/2" x 72-112" Box I Frame Size: 20" x 72" Unit Dimension: 20" x 72" Rlu!tt Q:>erlngs Fage sa 15 1\/bdifled: Tuesday, N:werrber04, 20085:13:21 FM I I 1/ \ I I\ ill -----r----- I\ VI \ LU Rough()peningsSchedlAe Scale: 1/4" = 1' (OJ!side Vielll) 019 19 Uving Room Uba Caserrert \1\Ard<:Mr (N16) QJantity: 1 R01.1gh Opening: 2.0-1/2" x 72-1/2" Box I FraJ'Tiie Size: 20" x 72" Unit Dimension: 20" x 72" Scale: 1/4'' = 1' (Q.d:side Vielll) 020 20 (A)SiUing Area Door Exterior SWil,lirg Door (6080) QJantity: 1 Rough Opening: 74-11/16" x 99-7/32" Box I FraJ'Tiie Size: 74-3/16" x 98-23132" Unit Dimension: 7 4-3/16" x 98-23132" Scale: 1/4'' = 1' (OJtside Vielll) 021 21 Master Bath MJI \1\ArdoiM;;JOoors QJantity: 1 Rough Opening: 48-1/2" x 76-1/2" Box I FraJ'Tiie Size: 48" x 76" Unit Dimension: 48" x 76" --------------------------------------------- RiniEd By; R:se, Mke Oeated: Tuesday, N:>Jerri:JEo-04, 2008 FbJgh Qlerirgs R3ge 7 of 15 MJdfJEd: Tuesday, N:>Jerri:JEo-04, 20085:13:21 FM Rough()peningsSchedUe 7 v [7 V-v -"'----r-···--" ~ t-~ ~<--~ I'" ~-/ • / ~- / Scale; 1/4'' = 1' (Cliside ViEMI) 022 25 Ubraly Front Elev MJI Vl.!rdOIIISIDoors Q.lanl:ity: 1 R01.1gh Opening: 85" x 1 03" Box/ Frame Size: 84-1/2" x 102-7/16" Unit Dimension: 84-1/2" x 102-7/16" Scale; 1/4'' = 1' (Cliside ViEMI) 023 26 Bedloom#2 Nleet Egress Utra Caserrert Vl.!rd<:m (L35) Q.lanl:ity: 1 R01.1gh Opening: 84-1/2" x 00-112" Box I Frame Size: 84" x 00" Unil: Dimension: 84" x 00" --------------------------------------------- G'ti!l Ainted By: Rlse, Mke ~.. Q-eatecf: Tuesday, N:>veni:ler 04, 2008 Scale: 1/4'' = 1' (Cliside ViEMI) 024 ZTB#2 Sterlill.J Dotble H..rg Vl.4rd<:m(1614-1) Q.lanl:ity: 1 Rough Opening: 22" x 37'' Box I Frame Size: 21-1/2" x 36-7116" Unil: Dimension: 21-1/2" x 36-7/16" Rx.gh C\)erings R3ge 8 of 15 M:xfified: Tuesday, N:>veni:ler 04, 2008 5:13:21 FM l!:t;ll Rinted Bt: R:se. Mke ~,; O"eated: Tuesday, l>bleni:ler 04, 2008 RoughOpeningsSchedUe Scale: 1/4" = 1' (OJtside View) 025 28 Qltional Bonus Room Sterlirg Doltlle ~Wn:low(2426-1) Q..lantity: 1 Rough Opening: 30" x 61" Box/ Fi'Cii'T\e Size: 29-1/2" x 00..7/16" Unit Dimension: 29-1/2" x 00..7/16" Scale: 1/4' = 1' (cutside View) 026 29 QltionaJ Bonus Room Push 01: Sirgle-Poirt Profile Caselrert Wn:low(W12) Q..lantity: 1 Rough Opening: 24-1/2" x 24-1/2" Box I Fi'Cii'T\e Size: 24" x 24" Unit Dimension: 24" x 24" Scale: 1/4" = 1' (cutside View) CYZl 30 Qltional Bonus Sterlirg Doltlle ~ Wn:low(2026-1) Q..lantity: 1 Rough Opening: 26" x 61" Box I Fi'Cii'T\e Size: 25-1/2" x 00..7/16" Unit Dimension: 25-1/2" x 00..7/16" fb.l!t> Q:Jenirgs Fage 9 d' 15 MrlfiSd: Tuesday, l>bleni:ler 04, 2008 5:13:21 Rill Rin1ed By. Rose, Mke Q-eated: Tuesday, Nov-04, 2008 RoughOpeningsSchedUe Scale: 1/4'' = 1' (OJtside Vif"MM) 028 31 Q:Jiional Bonus sterlirg Doltlle H.rg Vl.4rd<m(3226-2) Q.lantily: 1 Rough Opening: 75-1/2" x 61" Box/FrnmeSize: 75"x00..7/16" Unit Dimension: 75' x 00...7/16" Scale: 1/4'' = 1' (OJtside Vif"MM) 029 32 Q:Jiional Bonus sterlirg Dolble H.rg Vl.4rd<m(3226-2) Q.lantily: 1 Rough Opening: 75-1/2" x 61" Box/ Frame Size: 75' x 00...7/16" Unit Dimension: 75' x 00-7/16" Scale: 1/4'' = 1' (OJtside Vif"MM) 030 33 Bedroom#4 sterlirg Dolble H.rg Vl.4rd<m(2026-1) Q.lantily: 1 Rough Opening: 26" x 61" Box I Frame Size: 25-1/2" x 00-7/16" Unit Dimension: 25-1/2" x 00...7/16" R:AJgh QJerin9s Rge 10 a 15 M:xifled: Tuesday, Nov-04,20085:13:21 FM ri:t :l'i Rin!ed By: -., Ml<e ~ O"eated: Tuesday, Nlverrl:lel-04, 2008 RoughOpeningsSchedUe Scale: 1/4'' = 1' (OJtside VieW) 031 34 Bedroom#4 VerifY RQ Meets Egress Sterlirg DoltJie H..rg Wrdcm(3226-2) QJantil.y: 1 Rough Opening: 75-112" x 61" Box/ Fl'ai'Ttle Size: 75" x 00-7/16" Unit Dimension: 75" x 00-7/16" Scale: 1/4'' = 1' (D.Jtside VieW) 032 35 Bedroom#4 Sterlirg Doltlle H..rg Wrdcm(2026-1) QJantil.y: 1 Rough Opening: 26" x 61" Box/ Fl'ai'Ttle Size: 25-1/2" x00-7/16" Unit Dimension: 25-1/2" x 00-7116" Scale: 1/4'' = 1' (OJtside VieW) 033 36, :fl, 38, 39, 40, 41 Living Room Utra Caserrert Wrdcm(N16) QJantil.y: 6 Rough Opening: 20-1/2" x 72-112" Box I Fl'ai'Ttle Size: 20" x 7'2." Unit Dimension: 20" x 72" Fhlgh QJenings Rlge 11 d 15 Mx:lf!ed: Tuesday, Nlverri:Jel-04,20085:13:21 FM ~~ Rinled ~ Fbse, Mke ~.; o-eated: Tuesday, 1\bverrber 04, 2008 RoughOpeningsSchedUe Scale: 1/4!' = 1' (OJtside VieNj 034 42 Bedroomtl3 Ster1irg Dolble 1-lrg Wrrlow(2626-3) Q.lanlity: 1 Rough Opening: 95" x 61" Box I Frame Size: 94-1/2" x 100-7/16'' Unit Dimeii1Sion: 94-1/2" x 100-71113" Scale: 1/4!' = 1' (OJtside VieN) 035 43 &44 Bedroomtl3 Egress Ster1irg Dolble l-lrgWrrlow(3028-1) Q.lanlity: 2 Rough Opening: 36" x 65'' Box/Frame Size: 35-1/2"x64-7/16" Unit Dil'l'lei1Sion: 35-1/2" X 64-7/16" Scale: 1/4" = 1' (OJtside VieNj 036 458'113 Ster1irg Dolble 1-lrg Wrrlow(1620-1) Q.lanlity: 1 Rough Opening: 22" x 49" Box/ Frame Size: 21-1/2" x48-7/16'' Unit Dil'l'lei1Sion: 21-1/2" x48-7/16" R:ugh QJenings Fllge 12 cr 1s M:>dified: Tuesday, 1\bverrber 04, 2008 5:13:21 FM [iS=Rm--l16D)_I-bff_I;:;:;,R;v#2 ____ -_-::_-=_-_ ------Rlarirg-_-Fa1<-_ -~---_SI_pa_i_"-_1ieS RoughOpeningsSchedl.E Scae: 1/4" = 1' (OJtside View) 037 46 Left c:AEnby Attic Utra Casemart/Awirg Pidu'e Wn:low (a..BTCl'v1) QJantily: 1 Rough Opening: 24-1/2" x 42-1/2" !Box I FI'Cli'Tle Size: 24" x 42" Unit Dimension: 24" x 42" Scae: 1/4" = 1' (OJ!side View) 038 47 Right c:A Entry Attic Utra Casemart/Awirg Pidu'e Wn:low (a..BTCl'v1) QJantily: 1 Rough Opening: 24-1/2" x 24-1/2" Box I Frnme Size: 24" x 24" Unit Dimension: 24" x 24" --------------------------------------------- FHnted By: Rlse, Mke created: Tuesday, N:Jverrber 04, 2008 Rx.qo Q:>enlrg;; R3ge 13 ct 15 Mxlifred: Tuesday, N:Jverrber04, 20085:13:21 FM i,;t :I Ainted By: Rlse, Mke ll!li1l O"eated: Tuesday, N:lvenbe.-04, 2008 RoughOpeningsSctledlje Scale: 1/4" = 1' (OJ!side View) 039 48Attic Utra Gaserrert!Awirg Pidi.re Wrdow (CLSTQ\11) Qlantity: 1 Rough Opening: 24-1/2" x 24-1/2" Box I Fl<ll'I"'S Size: 24" x 24" Unit Dimension: 24" x 24" Scale: 1/4'' = 1' (OJtside Via.v) 040 49 above Entry Door Utra Gaserrert!Awirg Pidi.re Wrdow (N326P) Qlantity: 1 Rough Opening: 00..1/2" x 30-1/2" Box I Fl<ll'I"'S Size: 00" x 30" Unit Dimension: 00" x 30" Scale: 1/4" = 1' (OJ!side Via.v) 041 20 (B) Master Balh Sterlirg Dolble H.rg Wrdow(2020-1) Qlantity: 1 Rough Opening: 26" x49" Box/ Fl<ll'I"'S Size: 25-1/2" x48-7/16" Unit Dimension: 25-1/2" x 48-7/16" Fb.gh Q:Jerin9s R3Qe 14 a 15 M:xified: Tuesday, N:lvenber 04, 2008 5:13:21 FM Ffinted By; R>se. Mle Oeeted: Tuesday, N:>l-04, 2008 -----Rinted: ltusday, N:>l-13, 2008] RoughOpeningsSchedUe Scale: 1/4" = 1' (OJ!side VieN) 042 24 Ubraly MJI Wn:lovls/Doors QJantit.y: 1 Rough Opening: 48--1/2" x 00..1/2" Box I Frarrre Size: 48" x 00" Unit DimellS!on: 48" x 00" Scale: 1/4'' = 1' (OJtside VieN) 043 22 &23 Master Bedt00111 Sterlirg IJolJJie H.rg Wrdow(2630-1) QJantit.y: 2 Rough Opening: 32" x 00" Box I Frarrre Size: 31-1/2" x 68--7/115" Unit Dimension: 31-1/2" x 68--7/116" Rot.g~ Q:lenings Roge 15 a 15 Mxfified; Tuesday, N:>l-04, 2008 5:13:21 FM ~ CTL I THOMPSON IIIII m~m:IW~ SOILS AND FOUNDATION INVESTIGATION HOFFMAN RESIDENCE LOT 45, CERISE RANCH GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO Prepared For: JOAN & MIKE HOFFMAN 0145 Cheyenne Avenue Carbondale, CO 81623 Project No. GS04664-120 December 21, 2005 234 Center Drive I Glenwood Springs, Colorado 8i 60i -r~•~~hnno• 07().0"-~-?RI)q F'w: fl70-945-7411 TABLE OF CONTENTS SCOPE SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS SITE CONDITIONS PLANNED CONSTRUCTION SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS EARTHWORK Excavations Structural Fill Backfill FOUNDATION SLABS-ON-GRADE CONSTRUCTION BELOW-GRADE CONSTRUCTION SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE SURFACE DRAINAGE LIMITATIONS FIGURE 1 -APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIGURE 2-SUMMARY LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIGURE 3-SWELL/CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS FIGURE 4-EXTERIOR FOUNDATION WALL DRAIN TABLE 1-SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS JOAN & MIKE HOFFMAN LOT 45, CERISE RANCH CTL I PROJECT NO. GS04664-120 S:\G$04664.000\120\2. Reports\GS04664120 R1.doc 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 4 5 5 6 7 7 8 9 SCOPE This report presents the results of our soils and foundation investigation for the Hoffman Residence proposed on Lot 45, Cerise Ranch in Garfield County, Colorado. We conducted the investigation to evaluate subsurface conditions at the site and provide geotechnical recommendations for the residence. Our report was prepared from data developed from our field exploration, laboratory testing, engineering analysis, and experience at the site. This report includes a description of the subsurface conditions found in our exploratory borings, and presents our opinions and recommendations for foundations, floor systems, subsurface drainage, and details influenced by the subsoils. The recommendations contained in this report were developed based on the currently planned construction. If plans will differ significantly from the descriptions contained herein, we should be informed so that we can check that our recommendations and design criteria are appropriate. A summary of our conclusions is presented below. SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS 1. Subsurface conditions encountered in our exploratory borings consisted of about 1 foot of sandy clay "topsoil", silty sand with scattered gravel, and sandy clay underlain by slightly silty gravel. Free ground water was measured at depths of about 17 feet in our exploratory boring TH-1 on the day of exploratory drilling operations. Measurements to ground water two days after drilling found water at 13 feet. 2. We recommend constructing the residence on footing foundations supported by the undisturbed, natural soils. In our opinion, constructing bottoms of footings no deeper than about 4 feet below existing ground surface would enhance potential performance of footings. Design and construction criteria for footings are presented in the report 3. We judge potential for differential movement will be low for slabs-on- grade supported by the undisturbed, natural soils. Slab-on-grade floors should be no deeper than about 4 feet below existing ground surface to mitigate potential problems due to soft, very moist clay. JOAN & MIKE HOFFMAN LOT 45, CERISE RANCH CTL! PROJECT NO. G$04664~120 S;\G$04664.000\120\2. Reports\GS04664120 R1.doc 1 4. Surface drainage should be designed to provide for rapid removal of surface water away from the proposed residence. A foundation drain should be installed around building foundation walls. SITE CONDITIONS Cerise Ranch is a residential development located northeast of the intersection of State Highway 82 and County Road 100 in Garfield County, Colorado. Lot 45 is in the central part of the development and north of Larkspur Drive. The building envelope is in the south part of the lot. An abandoned irrigation ditch is present in the building envelope. Ground surface in the building envelope slopes gently down to the south at grades between 5 and 10 percent. Vegetation in the building envelope consists of grass and weeds, as well as sage, pinon and juniper on the slopes north of the building envelope. PLANNED CONSTRUCTION CTL 1 Thompson, Inc. was not provided with building plans for the Hoffman Residence. We understand the residence will be a two-story, wood-frame building with an attached garage as well as a detached garage. Garage and main level floors in typical residences in the area are generally constructed as slabs-on-grade. Fill will likely be required adjacent to the building to attain frost protection depth. Foundation loads are expected to vary between 1,000 and 3,000 pounds per lineal foot of foundation wall with maximum interior column loads of 30 kips. We should be informed if actual construction will differ from the descriptions above. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Subsurface conditions below the building envelope were investigated by drilling two exploratory borings (TH-1 and TH-2) at the approximate locations shown on Figure 1. Exploratory borings were drilled with 4-inch diameter, solid-stem auger and a track-mounted drill rig. Drilling operations were directed by our laboratory/field manager who logged the soils encountered in the borings and obtained JOAN & MIKE HOFFMAN LOT 45, CERISE RANCH CTL I PROJECT NO. G$04664·120 S:\GS04664.000\120\2. Reports\G$04664120 R1.doc 2 representative samples of the soils. Graphic logs of the soils encountered in our exploratory borings are shown on Figure 2. Subsurface conditions encountered in our exploratory borings consisted of about 1 foot of sandy clay "topsoil", 5 and 13 feet of silty sand with scattered gravel, and 21 and 6 feet of sandy clay. The clay layer was underlain by silty gravel in ourTH- 1. Results of field penetration resistance tests and observations during drilling indicated the sand was medium dense to dense, the clay was soft to very stiff. Free ground water was measured at depths of about 17 feet in our exploratory boring TH-1 on the day of exploratory drilling operations, and a depth of 13 feet two days after exploratory drilling operations were completed. Samples obtained from our borings were returned to our laboratory where typical samples were selected for testing. A sample of the upper soils from TH-1 was selected for one-dimensional swell-consolidation testing exhibited 0.2 percent consolidation when wetted under an applied load of 1,000 psf. Swell/consolidation test results are shown on Figure 3. Classification testing on a sample of clay from 19 feet in TH-2 had a liquid limit of 17 percent and a plastic index of 1 percent. Laboratory test results are summarized on Table I. EARTHWORK Excavations Excavations in the soils at this site can be accomplished using conventional, heavy-duty excavation equipment. Excavation sides will need to be sloped or braced to meet local, state and federal safety regulations. The natural soils within excavation depths at this site will classify as Type B (clay) and Type C (sand) soils based on OSHA standards governing excavations. Temporary slopes deeper than 5 feet should be no steeper than 1 to 1 (horizontal to vertical) in Type B soils and 1.5 to 1 in Type C soils. Contractors should identify the soils encountered in the excavations and refer to OSHA standards to determine appropriate slopes. JOAN & MIKE HOFFMAN LOT 45, CERISE RANCH CTL! PROJECT NO. GS04664·120 S:\GS04664.000\120\2. Reports\GS04664120 R1.doc 3 Free ground water was measured at depths as shallow as 13 feet in our exploratory borings at the time of drilling operations. We believe these levels represent the current surface of the ground water table. Ground water levels vary with seasonal conditions and time of year. The ground water table is generally closest to the ground surface during spring and summer months and is also influenced by irrigation ditches and irrigation. Our experience indicates that significant amounts of ground water flow occurs in the soil above the ground water table at this site when the irrigation ditch north of Larkspur Drive is in service. Excavation floors will need to be sloped to gravity discharges or temporary sumps where water can be removed by pumping. Our subsurface information indicates that excavation depths greater than about 4 feet below existing ground surface may encounter soft, very moist clays that are not suitable to support footings or floor slabs. Structural Fill Structural fill may be required below the garage floor slab and driveway. We recommend that the existing ditch be relocated downhill of the residence. The existing ditch should be stripped of vegetation and "squared off'' using heavy equipment. The "squared off" ditch should be backfilled with structural fill. It is important the ditch water is not directed below the residence. Fill will likely be required to raise grades adjacent to the building. Areas which will receive fill should be stripped of vegetation, organic soils and debris. The on-site soils free of organic matter, debris and rocks larger than 4 inches in diameter can be used as fill outside the building footprint. Import soils should consist of a Class 4 aggregate base course or similar soil. Structural fill should be placed in thin, loose lifts of 8 inches thick or less, moisture conditioned to within 2 percent of optimum moisture content. Structural fill should be compacted to at least 98 percent of standard Proctor (ASTM D 698) maximum dry density. Common fill should be compacted to at least 95 percent JOAN & MIKE HOFFMAN LOT 45, CERISE RANCH CTL I PROJECT NO. GS04664-120 S:\GS04664.000\120\2. Reports\G$04664120 R1.doc 4 of ASTM D 698. Density and moisture content of structural fill and common fill should be checked by a representative of our firm during placement. Backfill Properly placed backfill adjacent to foundation wall exteriors is important to reduce infiltration of surface water and subsequent consolidation. Backfill placed adjacent to foundation walls should be free of organic matter, debris and rocks larger than 4 inches in diameter. Backfill should be moisture conditioned to within 2 percent of optimum moisture content and compacted to at least 95 percent of standard Proctor (ASTM D 698) maximum dry density. We recommend that our firm be called to check density and moisture content of backfill during placement. FOUNDATION We recommend constructing the Hoffman Residence on footing foundations supported by the undisturbed, natural silty sands. Our experience at the site indicates that the soils below about 4 or 5 feet possess increasingly higher moisture content and lower shear strengths. In our opinion, constructing the bottoms of the footings no deeper than about 4 feet below existing ground surface would enhance potential performance of footings. Our representative should be called to observe conditions exposed in the completed foundation excavation prior to placing forms to check that the exposed subsoils are as expected and suitable for support of the footings as designed. Recommended design and construction criteria for footings are presented below. 1. The footing foundations should be supported on the undisturbed silty sand. Soils loosened during the excavation or forming process for the footings should be removed or re-compacted prior to placing concrete. 2. Footings should be designed for a maximum allowable soil bearing pressure of 1,500 psf. 3. Continuous wall footings should have a minimum width of at least 24 inches. Foundations for isolated columns should have minimum JOAN & MIKE HOFFMAN LOT 45, CERISE RANCH CTL I PROJECT NO. G$04664~120 S:\GS04664.000\120\2, Reports\GS04664120 R1.doc 5 dimensions of 30 inches by 30 inches. Larger sizes may be required, depending upon foundation loads. 4. Grade beams and foundation walls should be well reinforced, top and bottom, to span undisclosed loose or soft soil pockets. We recommend reinforcement sufficient to span an unsupported distance of at least 12 feet. Reinforcement should be designed by the structural engineer. 5. The soils under exterior footings should be protected from freezing. We recommend the bottom of footings be constructed at a depth of at least 36 inches below finished grades for frost protection. SLAB-ON-GRADE CONSTRUCTION Garage and main level floors in typical residences in the area are generally constructed as slabs-on-grade. Based on our laboratory test data and our experience, we judge slab-on-grade construction can be supported by the undisturbed, natural soils with low risk of differential movement and associated damage. We recommend that slab-on-grade floors be no deeper than about 4 feet below existing ground surface to mitigate potential problems due to soft, very moist clays. We recommend the following precautions for slab-on-grade construction at this site. 1. Slabs should be separated from wall footings and column pads with slip joints which allow free vertical movement of the slabs. 2. Underslab plumbing should be pressure tested for leaks before the slabs are poured. Plumbing and utilities which pass through slabs should be isolated from the slabs with sleeves and provided with flexible couplings to slab-supported appliances. 3. Exterior patio and porch slabs should be isolated from the residence. These slabs should be well-reinforced to function as independent units. 4. Frequent control joints should be provided, in accordance with American Concrete Institute (ACI) recommendations, to reduce problems associated with shrinkage and curling. JOAN & MIKE HOFFMAN LOT 45, CERISE RANCH CTL! PROJECT NO. GS04664w1-20 S:\G$04664.000\120\2. Reports\G$04664120 R1.doc 6 BELOW-GRADE CONSTRUCTION Foundation walls which extend below-grade should be designed for lateral earth pressures where backfill is not present to about the same extent on both sides of the wall. Many factors affectthevalues of the design lateral earth pressure. These factors include, but are not limited to, the type, compaction, slope and drainage of the backfill, and the rigidity of the wall against rotation and deflection. For a very rigid wall where negligible or very little deflection will occur, an "at-rest" lateral earth pressure should be used in design. For walls which can deflect or rotate 0.5 to 1 percent of wall height (depending upon the backfill types), lower "active" lateral earth pressures are appropriate. Our experience indicates typical below-grade walls in residences can deflect or rotate slightly under normal design loads, and that this deflection results in satisfactory wall performance. Thus, the earth pressures on the walls will likely be between the "active" and "at-rest" conditions. If the on-site soils are used as backfill, we recommend design of below-grade walls using an equivalent fluid density of at least 50 pcf for this site. This equivalent density does not include allowances for sloping backfill, surcharges or hydrostatic pressures. Drainage must be provided. Backfill should be placed and compacted according to the criteria outlined in the EARTHWORK section. SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE Water from rain, snow melt and surface irrigation of lawns and landscaping frequently flows through relatively permeable backfill placed adjacent to a building and collects on the surface of less permeable soils at foundation elevations. Additionally, significant amounts of ground water flow occurs in the soil above the ground water table at this site when the irrigation ditch north of Larkspur Drive is in service. These sources of water can cause wet or moist conditions in below-grade areas after construction. We recommend installation of an exterior foundation drain adjacent to building foundation walls. JOAN & MIKE HOFFMAN LOT 45, CERISE RANCH CTL! PROJECT NO. GS04664·120 S:\GS04664.000\120\2. Reports\GS04664120 R1.doc 7 The exterior foundation drain should consist of 4-inch diameter, slotted, PVC pipe encased in free draining gravel. A prefabricated drainage composite should be placed adjacent to foundation walls. The drain should lead to a positive gravity outlet, or to a sump pit where water can be removed by pumping. A typical foundation drain detail is presented on Figure 4. SURFACE DRAINAGE Surface drainage is critical to the performance of building foundations and floor slabs. We recommend the following precautions be observed during construction and maintained at all times after the residence is completed: 1. The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the residence be should sloped to drain away from the residence in all directions. We recommend providing a slope of at least 6 inches in the first 5 feet around the residence. 2. Backfill around the exterior of foundation walls should be placed in maximum 8 inch thick loose lifts, moisture conditioned to within 2 percent of optimum moisture content and compacted to at least 95 percent of standard Proctor (ASTM D 698) maximum dry density. 3. The residence should be provided with roof gutters and downspouts. Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill. Splash blocks and downspout extensions should be provided at all discharge points. 4. Landscaping should be carefully designed to mm1m1ze irrigation. Plants used near foundation walls should be limited to those with low moisture requirements; irrigated grass should not be located within 5 feet of the foundation. Sprinklers should not discharge within 5 feet of the foundation and should be directed away from the building. Irrigation should be limited to the minimum amount sufficient to maintain vegetation; the application of additional water will increase the likelihood of slab and foundation movements. 5. Impervious plastic membranes should not be used to cover the ground surface immediately surrounding the residence. These membranes tend to trap moisture and prevent normal evaporation from occurring. Geotextile fabrics can be used to control weed growth and allow some evaporation to occur. JOAN & MIKE HOFFMAN LOT 45, CERISE RANCH CTL I PROJECT NO. G$04664-120 S:\GS04664.000\120\2. Reports\G$04664120 R1.doc 8 LIMITATIONS Our exploratory borings provide a reasonably accurate picture of subsurface conditions. Variations in the subsurface conditions not indicated by our borings will occur. We should be called to observe conditions exposed in the completed foundation excavation to check that subsurface conditions are as anticipated. This investigation was conducted in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by geotechnical engineers currently practicing under similar conditions in the locality of this project. No other warranty, express or implied, is made. If we can be of further service in discussing the contents of this report or in the analysis ofthe influence ofthe subsurface conditions on the design of the structure, please call. JOAN & MIKE HOFFMAN LOT 45, CERISE RANCH CTL I PROJECT NO. GS04664~120 S:\GS04664.000\120\2. Reports\G$04664120 R1.doc 9 Joan & Mike Hoffman Lot 46, Cerise Ranch Project No. GS04664-i20 .Approximate locations of Exploratory Borings Fig. 1 6370 6365 6360 6355 6350 6345 6340 6335 6330 Project No. G$04664-120 TH-1 EL=6362 42/12 5/12 10/12 TH-2 EL=6368 50/11 :· .. 24/12 6370 6365 6360 6355 6350 6345 6340 6335 6330 LEGEND' NOTES' Sandy cloy "topsoil", organic, stiff, moist, dark brown. Sand, silty, grovel, medium dense to dense, moist, brown. (SM, GM) Cloy, sandy, soft to very stiff, moist to very moist, brown. (CL) Gravel, silty, cobbles, very dense, wet, brown. (GM, GP) Drive sample. The symbol 42/12 indicates that 42 blows of a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches were required to drive a 2.5 inch O.D. CoUfornlo sampler 12 Inches. Indicates free ground water !eve! measured on the day of drii!Ing. Indicates depth to which ground water seepage had filled boring when checked on December 14, 2005. 1. Exploratory borings were drilled on December 12, 2005 with 4-inch diameter, solid-stem auger o:nd a track-mounted drl!l rig. 2. Locations and elevations of exploratory borings are approximate. 3. These exploratory borings are subject to the explanations, limitations and conclusions as contained in this report. SUMMARY LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS Fig. 2 z 0 iii z ~ ~ ?F. z 0 iii U) ~ D. ::;;: 0 (.) ·y . - ' : ' ?~----~~~~~~~----~--~~~~~~----~--~~~~~ ll: . ' : ' ; . :. : ,l _) _j : : i,_ : : : i i . : : : : . . . : : :: ,i :_ ••• •· •••• : : l i i i i : i i ; 1 . : i ! 6 ·······-------···· +· ---~--------}----;----.:-----:----··-+--< ----.--------------~ ....... ----:--------·}······:-----: ·+---:---l"'+····· -------------1·--·-· -----:--------~-------; .... , .... 1----:---;-- .. 1 1_. '.· ••• : i i : ,: i : . : : : ' ' . : : : : -·:· -·.· :·-· ,: j 1 . : : i : .•• ' •· ....... i . ' : i : : l . : : : : : : : : : : : : : ,! _i ·.: ._; -.: : •• •.... : . : ._: ,i ,! ,! i : •• : : _.: ,: 5 -------·---------· ... ~. . . . ' . ' . -----+. -------+. ___ ) __ ) ... ~---+-++--'"''7"····--· •. ;· ...... ) .•.••.. ~----~-----; ___ , ___ , __ --·-·:------:_,_----~_!. ---:-··7·-~---r -----------------. . : : __ ; _; __ . ·_) !.. ' : : : : : : i i i ! :,' ! ' : i ! : : ! ) .. J..... : . ' ' 4 ............ . ···---f.:. 1 j 1 ! i i i i ····--··-~·········,,:-· ···,r ·+·+-1--++··· . : l l l i i i ·······:-···· ·-······----~----,-·······:-·····r···--··· ·:-·····--·····-~_: ·····-:····: ·-r··r·r· 1 : . i i : l : l " : : : : : ' ' i i j i :_: : : : : : : l i : ; : i : i j ! l i ! 1 i ! i l 3 ... ················~····· ·····:-... ) .... 1 ·+·-~ --~··tt ........ ;... ~--------~-------~ .. ) ... LJ.-~ . .1 .................. j .......... , ·-----~-------~---·j·---~---1··-L i : : : ' . i ! ~ i l : : : : : j 1 i i i 1 : : :: : : ! i : ' : ' ' 2 .................. ---'.. .... ...i. ... L.! . .L.LL.......... • i : · · · · · ........... L : : · · : : · ......... ; : ; ........ ,, ........... ~ ........ , ...... ,. ·j----'·-+·H--------......... ~-------~------(--'----'---'--+· j ! 1 : : : i _! .l ·.i .. 1 i l ! • • ! : l . . . ,. . ; 1 j l : i : 1 i 1 i : L __ :' ___ ,i_·---~_::···:i ___ ; __ ,'......... 1 ! i : 1 1 1 .................... .t. ....... -+··· ---~---·r----..:-----\·--f--.t.--:----------------·----t-----------+------·+·-----;---. . ----------:----------+-------+-----+----l--·-1---{---L ) j i i! ' : i j : 1 : : l l _) !.-_) : l 1 . l l : i l j i i i 1 i o ---·' .. L ' ~~LLLL lADDI~toNALJdMP~~ssiON-~NDER j .. l..JL.]L • ! • ! [ [ i '! [coN~TAI-JTjP~~s~p~E DUE iO W~TTI~N~ ._1 .i_: i j : : i i : : ' : i : --~_:_____ l . . +-----:----+--· ... , ... _:" .. f .. --------7""---,i_ ......... ,_· ....... , ·+--·j_ --++·j--·r ..... T. .. ... L .... l .... L. .......... .L i l ¥ )!:; ) 1. ;!;i i i 1 i i: : ! : : l i i ! ~1 -·- ~ j i ! i : . .: ' : i : ..•• !. .... _! ....•• _: ... _,! ····· l i : i : 1 -2 .. -----------------~----------~--------~------~----~-----1----l---~ ... ~----. -----------~---------~---------~------~----~ . -------------~------......... ~ -------+-----·}----~-----... _: _____ :---~.~--. : . ' : i : : i : ; i i ·.'. . : i i ' : i ' ,. ' . 1 ! i ; :: ' i : 1 ) 1 \ l f j ; -------~.-......... ,:. ....... L. -:_! .. LJ .LLL ........... ----+---------;,------L .. ) .. ; .... .; ... ~ .. .Lt ..... -----------L -------"--.. ----~---.L .. J. j ; 1 : l 1 r ; ~ . 1 1 1 1 1 : : , · · ; ---; ___ ---~.i--·r· i i i : i ! j . ' l t • : ) + : t+U~-+ ~-++jlU~ .. ,. , -f + L;-L+ -3 -4 .......... .. ~ ! i l -5 H•; .,.,,.,LLl ,. + ++i•+L +i ;;;LLL t : : t :: ! -.: i : ! 1. ' : i l . ' : j i i i i t : 1 i : : 6 . . l . i i l ~ .... L ... ~.: .. ~-~---~.~---'.: ___ t_i ...... i i . . . i ! j , "H"""""" "'C""""""t" ., .. , .. ., .. , "'!""" , .. , ... ,. "' """""""C"""• "'' "H"C' """'C"""""""" . ..,. ..... , .... , '"j"''"''" l l l 1 ! : : : : : i ,! .:_· • ..... l:._·, • . • ..... '· •. ' i : : : : : : ..•. _'_,· ....• :l·····:' . ' . : : : : .L.*,: ... LLL : : : : : · · · · : · -··--!-·-·------:-·-----.~------:---·------·--------r--------·+··i·--~----· ···+-----...... +--····;_:---+·+·i--+ 1 1 l i :: 1 1 j -7 ...... . : i [ i i i l i j ) ,! 1..----~--~~~~~l~·-·~i----~--~~_.~~-~-~-----~--~~~~~wu ~ . .. .. 0.1 Sample of SAND,SILTY (SM) From TH-1 AT 4 FEET PROJECT NO. GS04664-120 1.0 10 APPLIED PRESSURE -KSF NATURAL DRY UNIT WEIGHT= NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT= 100 131 PCF 6.5 % Swell Consolidation Test Results FIG. 3 8 ' ·.·:: ::.·:::::::: ::. :::: ::::.·: ::.·. -.-: :. SLOPE ·----lP~ER~R~E=P=O==RT~---1 ·mmH¥.} ·:::: ::::::::::::. SLOPE PER OSHA \__ BACKFILL~ (COMPOSITION AND COMPACTION PER REPORl) BELOW GRADE WALL ENCASE PIPE IN WASHED CONCRETE AGGREGATE (ASTM C33, NO. 57 OR NO. 67) EXTEND GRAVEL TO AT LEAST 1/2 HEIGHT OF FOOTING. .-.-::::::. ·:: :::::: ::::.·:::::::::::: :::::: _._._ ·:::: :. ·:: ·::::::: :::::::::: ·;:: :::::::.-.-. ·:: :. :::::::. ·::.·:: :. -. ·: COVER GRAVEL FILTER FABRIC. 8'' MINIMUM OR BEYOND 1:1 SLOPE FROM BOTTOM OF FOOTING. (WHICHEVER IS GREATER) 4-INCH DIAMETER PERFORATED DRAIN PIPE. THE PIPE SHOULD BE LAID IN A TRENCH WITH A MINIMUM SLOPE OF 0.5 PERCENT. ProjectNo.GS04664-i20 NOTE: DRAIN SHOULD BE AT LEAST 2 INCHES BELOW BOTTOM OF FOOTING AT THE HIGHEST POINT AND SLOPE DOWNWARD TO A POSITIVE GRAVITY OUTLET OR TO A SUMP WHERE WATER CAN BE REMOVED BY PUMPING. REINFORCING STEEL PER STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS PROVIDE POSITIVE SLIP JOINT BETWEEN SLAB AND WALL. FLOOR SLAB FOOTING OR PAD PROVIDE PVC SHEETING GLUED TO FOUNDATION WALL TO REDUCE MOISTURE PENETRATION Exterior Foundation Wall Drain Fig. 4 PROJECT NO. GS04664-120 TABLE I SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS NATURAL ATTERBERG LIMITS GRADATION TESTS PASSING BORING DEPTH NATURAL DRY SWELL* LIQUID PLASTICITY PERCENT PERCENT NO. 200 SOIL CLASSIFICATION MOISTURE DENSITY LIMIT INDEX GRAVEL SAND SIEVE (FEE1j (%) (PC F) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) TH-1 4 6.5 131 -0.2 SAND,SILTY (SM TH-1 9 19.4 110 CLA Y,SANDY (CL) TH-2 4 7.1 116 SAND,SIL TY (SM TH-2 19 9.8 103 17 1 65 CLAY,SANDY (CL) *Note: Swell due to wetting under an applied load of 1,000 psf. Negative values Indicate consolidation. Page 1 of 1 Ken Smith From: Sent: To: Subject: Downing, Cherry [Cdowning@CTL Thompson.com] on behalf of Mechling, John [Jmechling@CTL Thompson.com) Tuesday, January 13,20091:41 PM Ken Smith FW: Hoffman Attachments: Hoffman.pdf From: Mechling, John Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 3:04 PM To: Ksmith@garfieldcounty.com Subject: Hoffman Nice talking to you. Page 1 of 1 Attached is my letter dated January 9, 2009. An allowable soil bearing of 1500 psf is appropriate for the soils occurring at the bottoM &f the excavation on January 9. 1113/2009 January 9, 2009 Joan & Michael Hoffman 0145 Cheyenne Avenue Carbondale, CO 81623 Subject: Excavation Observation Hoffman Residence Lot 45, Cerise Ranch Garfield County, Colorado Project No. GS04664-305 T CTLITHOMPSON We visited the subject site on January 9, 2009. The purpose of our site visit was to observe the soils exposed at footing elevations and opine on the suitability of the exposed soils for support of footings. We observed that large boulders were found at footing locations in two areas. The footing forrnwork was constructed with the boulders in place. We believe it is appropriate to construct the footing incorporating the boulders as part of the foundation. Removal of a boulder at the bottom of the excavation exposed soft, wet soils in the vicinity of the foundation. We recommended that the contractor crowd 1- 1/2 Inch diameter rock into the area of soft soil to stabilize the soil. During our site visit, we observed that the contractor had performed the corrective action to our satisfaction. If additional boulders are encountered in the area of the foundation, we recommend that the boulders remain in place and are incorporated into the concrete foundation. We appreciate the opportunity to work with you on this projecl If you have questions or we can be of further service, please call. Very Truly Yours CTL I THOMPSON, INC. ~If-~ Edward R. White, P .E. Staff Engineer ERW:JM:cd (5 copies sent) 234 Center Drive I Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Telephone: 970-945-2809 Fax: 970-945-7411 01/07/2009 15:37 9709457411 January 7, 2009 Joan & Michael Hoffman 0145 Cheyenne Avenue Carbondale, CO 61623 Subject: Excavation Observation Hoffman Residence Lot 45, Cerise Ranch Garfield County, Colorado Project No. G$04664-305 CTLGLENWOOD PAGE 02/03 CTLITHOMPSON l!tli\'m...:w:.~ RECEIVI~.U JAN liS '/.O~ GI\Rf\ELD COU!7;;~~ BUILDING & P!}\NI' 'I,, As requested, we visited the subject site on January 5, 2009. The purpose of our site visits were to observe the soils exposed at footing elevations. CTL 1 Thompson, Inc. performed a soils and foundation investigation for the subject residences (CTL 1 Thompson, Inc. Project No. GS04S64, dated December 21, 2005). The soils exposed at the bottom of the foundation excavation consist of native sandy clay. These soils are similar to the soils encountered during our soils and foundation investigation. We appreciate the opportunity to work with you on this project. If you have questions or we can be of further service, please call. Very truly yours, CTL I THOMPSON, INC. ~~~~1 Dan Downing Laboratory/Field Manager DO:JM:cd (5 copies sent) 234 Center Drive I Glenwood Springs, Coloraclo 81601 T~lepi>One: 970·945-2809 Fax: 970·945-7411 01/07/2009 15:37 9709457411 Excavation/Footing Inspection Joan & (lllichaell-loffman 0145 Cheyenne Avenue Carbondale, CO 81623 Recommended Foundation System CTLITHOMPSON JOB NO. ~~--=-L ;;?Q _____ _ DATED------·-· /. _ _:::2(_:_<'?5:-... ------ %SPREAD F'OOTING~; ·-MAXIMUM SOIL Pl'lESSURE OF . ~c.C::> .. ·-·--f'SF. MINIMUM WIDTH___ -~ ·---· . INCHES D FOOTINGS W11H MINIMUM DEADlOAIJ MAXIMUM SOIL PRESSURE OF __ .. MINIMUM DEhOLOAD PR~SSURE OF -----· PSF. ___ rsF. PROVIDE A __ ·---lNCt-1 VOID BENf-:ATH GRADE BEAMS MINIMUM WIDTH ____ . ---· ------INCHES J.'J GRADE BEAMS AND PAPS MAXIMUM SOIL PRESSURE OF _ MINIMUM f.JEADLOAD PRESSURI'" OF __ PSF. PSF. PROVIDE A .. ___ ·-1NCH VOII> BENEAll-4 GflfADE BEAMS MINIMUM WIIJTH. ·-------·--INCHES Foundation Plan BY _ ----· ·---· ------·----··---- P!.AN NO. ---------·--·-__ DATE ------- WALL FOOTING WIDTH _ _{INCHES) DEPTH (INCHES) COI.UMN PAD_ ·---(INCI1~Sl DEPTl1 (INCHES) COLUMN PAD----·--(INCHES! DEPT!< (INCHES) REINFORCEMENT A$ PER PLAN: 0 YES 0 NO 0 NONE REO\JIRED 0 AT SITE 0 INSTALLED Soil Conditions At Footing Level UPPER I.EVEL __ ---- Ground Water Conditions .. ____ .. __ _ CTLGLENWOOD PAGE 03/03 CTL !THOMPSON ADDRESS~-~ ~ --/"-"=';;;;.. '~--. .. .... ________ .. ·--~~ (7-~ ------------- LC1'f /_~ ---·J::f --·?"---. FlUNG NO. Foundation Layout A !NOICATES APPROXIMATE DEPTH/WlDTH Mo~SUREMENT LOCATION Instructions to Contractor ~N Goi::.NERAL CONFOPIMANCE WITH PLAN '[JREJECrED RECOMMENDED CORRECTIVE PROCEDURE January 7, 2009 Joan & Michael Hoffman 0145 Cheyenne Avenue Carbondale, CO 81623 Subject: Excavation Observation Hoffman Residence Lot 45, Cerise Ranch Garfield County, Colorado Project No. GS04664-305 T CTll THOMPSON As requested, we visited the subject site on January 5, 2009. The purpose of our site visits were to observe the soils exposed at footing elevations. CTL 1 Thompson, Inc. performed a soils and foundation investigation for the subject residences (CTL I Thompson, Inc. Project No. GS04664, dated December 21, 2005). The soils exposed at the bottom of the foundation excavation consist of native sandy clay. These soils are similar to the soils encountered during our soils and foundation investigation. We appreciate the opportunity to work with you on this project. If you have questions or we can be of further service, please call. Very truly yours, CTL I THOMPSON, INC. ;;n~~-·~) Dan Downing Laboratory/Field Manager DD:JM:cd (5 copies sent) 234 Center Drive I Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Telephone: 970-945-2809 Fax: 970-945-7411 Excavation/Footing Inspection Joan & Michael Hoffman 0145 Cheyenne Avenue Carbondale, CO 81623 Recommended Foundation System CTL!THOMPSON JOB NO.-~~-f 2C2..__. __ _ DATED~-·---_/_ -21' -=~------- ,..gfsPREAD FOOTINGS MAXIMUM SOIL PRESSURE OF _fr--2CD PSF. MINIMUM WIDTH Z<;c " INCHES 0 FOOTINGS WITH MINIMUM DEADLOAD MAXIMUM SOIL PRESSURE OF -------PSF MINIMUM DEADLOAD PRESSURE OF ---------PSF PROVIDE A ------INCH VOID BENEATH GRADE BEAMS MINIMUM WIDTH INCHES 0 GRADE BEAMS AND PADS MAXIMUM SOIL PRESSURE OF ---------PSF. MINIMUM DEADLOAD PRESSURE OF PSF. PROVIDE A _ ___ INCH VOID BENEATH GRADE BEAMS MINIMUM WIDTH------------ Foundation Plan BY INCHES PLAN NO. --------DATE ------ WALL FOOTING WIDTH (INCHES) DEPTH ---(INCHES) COLUMN PAD (INCHES) DEPTH (INCHES) COLUMN PAD (INCHES) DEPTH (INCHES) REINFORCEMENT AS PER PLAN: 0 YES 0 NO 0 NONE REQUIRED 0 AT SITE 0 INSTALLED Soil Conditions At Footing Level UPPER LEVEL -------------------·---- Ground Water Conditions ~ONE IN EXCAVATION tJ NONE ENCOUNTERED IN BORING NO. --~TO ___ FEET ~NCOUNTERED AT P--· FEET IN BORING NO. (If /~ Remarks: {~cAZ:. Gc /A-'$:Ca&§"" ~/t&d}jjj}~c;g;_ s:~ · · ~ora> S::c:::/L 9 CTLITHOMPSON LOT FILING NO.---- Foundation Layout '77~£..£ ~ ~'9?-cR rz.::i?. A INDICATES APPROXIMATE DEPTH/WIDTH MEASUREMENT LOCATION Instructions to Contractor ~N GENERAL CONFORMANCE WITH PLAN 'tJ REJECTED RECOMMENDED CORRECTIVE PROCEDURE -·------··------------- --------------··---- ·----·-·-- Parcel Detail Page 1 of4 Garfield County Assessor/Treasurer Parcel Detail Information Assessor/Treasurer Pro~_Search I As.s.essor SubseLQ.Yenr I Assessor .. Sl!les Search Clerk.&. Recorder_E.eceptiQll.Aearch Basic B1Jllding_ChJ1racteristics I Tax.InfQrmation Par!eelDetail I '{alue Det!lil I SalesDetail I R.esidenti<ll/Commer.£i.!ll Improveme_nt Detail .Land Demil I PhoJQg!:l!Phs I Mill Leyy_RevenuesJ)etail I Tax Area II Account Number II Parcel Number /1 2007 Mill Levy I I 084 II R008079 II 239132102045 II 64.309 I Owner Name and Mailing Address /HOFFMAN, MICHAEL L & JOAN FAYE /145 CHEYENNE /CARBONDALE, CO 81623 Assessor's Parcel Description (Not to be used as a legal description) jsECT,TWN,RNG:32-7-87 SUB:CERISE jRANCH SUB-DIV. LOT:45 DESC: PHASE 2 jPRE:R111837 PRE:R007164 BK:850 jPG:81 BK:838 PG:205 BK:370 PG:379 jBK:367 PG:147 BK:185 PG:319 BK:142 jPG:547 BK:1291 PG:680 BK:1290 jPG:174 BK:1290 PG:170 BK:1290 jPG:168 BK:1290 PG:144 BK:1207 jPG:399 BK:1207 PG:396 BK:1207 jPG:394 BK:0606 PG:0569 BK:1750 jPG:972 RECPT:687496 BK:1589 PG:562 jRECPT:652490 BK:1576 PG:681 jRECPT:649971 BK:1576 PG:677 jRECPT:649970 BK:1550 PG:552 jRECPT:643769 BK:1523 PG:60 http://www .garcoact.corn/ assessor/parcel.asp ?Parce!N umber=23 913 21 0204 5 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 12/15/2008 Parcel Detail Page 2 of4 IRECPT:637392 BK:1508 PG:376 I IRECPT:634548 BK:1245 PG:482 I jRECPT:579298 BK:1233 PG:546 I IRECPT:573505 BK:1222 PG:9 I jRECPT:573542 BK:1222 PG:l I jRECPT:573541 BK:1221 PG:942 I jRECPT:573540 BK:1221 PG:922 I jRECPT:573539 BK:1209 PG:906 I jRECPT:570047 BK:1209 PG:888 I jRECPT:570046 BK:1209 PG:877 I IRECPT:570044 BK:1209 PG:872 I jRECPT:570043 BK:l206 PG:248 I jRECPT:569106 BK:1181 PG:946 I IRECPT:561931 BK:l069 PG:76 I jRECPT:525654 BK:1036 PG:0356 I jBK:0867 PG:0950 BK:0867 PG:0946 I jBK:0867 PG:0941 I Location I Physical Address: 1/13 LARKSPUR DR CARBONDALE/ I Subdivision: 1/CERISE RANCH SUB-DIV. I I Land Acres: / 5.27 I Land Sq Ft: / 0 I Section II Township II Range I I 32 II 7 II 87 I 2008 Property Tax Valuation Information II Actual Value II Assessed Value I I Land: 235,oooll 68,150/ I Improvements: II Oil 0 I Total: 235,oooll 68,150/ AdditionalYalue Detail Most Recent Sale i'~==========~S~al~e=D=at=e:~~i/=ll=n=9/=20=0=5==========~11 http://www .garcoact.com/ assessor/parcel.asp ?ParcelN umber=23 913 21 0204 5 12/15/2008 Parcel Detail Page 3 of4 II Sale Price: ll2oo,ooo II Addition<tl.Sales Detail Basic Building Characteristics Number of Residential 0 Buildings: Number of Commllnd 0 Buildings: No Building Records Found Tax Information I Tax Year II Transaction Type II Amount I I 2007 II Tax Payment: Whole II ($4,382.64)1 I 2007 II Tax Amount II $4,382.641 I 2006 II Tax Payment: Whole II ($3,057.68)1 I 2006 II Tax Amount II $3,057.681 I 2005 II Tax Payment: Whole II ($3,028.68)1 I 2005 II Tax Abatement II ($146.88)1 I 2005 II Tax Amount II $3,175.561 I 2004 II Tax Payment: Whole II ($1,735.52)1 I 2004 II Tax Amount II $1,735.521 I 2003 II Interest Payment II ($13.37)1 I 2003 II Interest Charge II $13.371 2003 II Tax Payment: Whole II ($1,337.04)1 2003 II Tax Abatement II ($150.58)1 2003 II Tax Amount II $1,487.621 2002 II Interest Payment II ($59.46)1 2002 II Interest Charge II $59.461 2002 II Tax Payment: Whole II ($1,486.44)1 I 2002 II Tax Amount II $1,486.441 I 2001 II Tax Payment: Whole II ($10.44)1 I 2001 II Tax Amount II $10.441 http://www. garcoact.corn/ assessor/parcel.asp ?Parce IN umber=23 913 21 02045 12115/2008