The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1.05 Application Part 6provide that at least l07o ofthe housing mix are affordable housing units. providing l0% affordable housing units will no! by itselt be sufficient to fulfill the pUD requiremLt for a mix of housing. (2) OFsite - Given that these lands have been planned for low density, these are not always the best locations for affordable housing. At the applicant'srequest Garfield County will consider oftsite affordable housing. The applicant must show ttrat affordable housing meets the requiremenB ofthese regulations and the Garfield Courty Aftordable Housing Guidelines, and that these housing units will actually be built in Study Area l. No cash in lieu payment will be accepted. (3) Standards'In accordance with the above stated policy, ifthe applicant proposes to utilize offisite affordable housing, all proposals for the location of oflsite atrorAa6e housing units shall, at the time of Preliminary Plan, be required to demonstrate to the satisfaction of Garfield County that: (a) tre proposed oflsite affordable housing unis are located at a sitg which is wifiin the boundaries of an incorporated town or municipality, which is: (i) sbrviced by publicly owned and publicly maintained wate,r, sewer, and utility infizsrucn[e; and (ii) situated in close proximity or offer 6e oppornrnity for public transit to, the commercial retail, or business centers of said town or municipality. (b) if the applicant proposes to utilize o$site affordable housing and deruonstrates that such housing cannot be located u,ithifl a mruriiipality or town, then the following shall apply: (i) be located within a zone distict allowing greater densities and a greater variety ofhousing typeq which densities and housing types strall be consistent with the location, the construction, and the maintenance of affordable housing unitg when compared to the land which is the subject ofthe requested Re-zoning or pUD; and (ii) be on the whole located substantially closer in proximity to ttre following categories of facilities and amenities, when compared to the project parcel: public schools; commercial or retail c€nters; community or public recreational parks and activities; hospital and healttr care facilities; professional senrices; and public serr.icbs, incruding firg police, and emergency services; (iii) be serviced bycentalized domestic water and sew€r systems at a cost which Garfield county shall determine is consisteirt wittr the definition of affordability herein; and 4.07.15.03 (iv) not be subject to any special assessments or charges for the upkeep of community facilities or amenities, which Garfield County determineg is inconsistent with the definition of affordability herein. (c) the applicant proposing off-site affordable housing units must submit, with the Preliminary Plan application to suMivide, evidence ttrat the developer has: (i) completed atl preliminary site design and planning; (ii) submitted for preliminary Plan review the development design proposal; and ' (iii) provided dl forms of deed restrictions on both the lots and their units. (d) At the time of Preliminary Plan, and consistent with the provisions sct forth in Sections 4.07.15.03 and 5.09.05.03, all proposals for the location and the constnrction of o$site affordable housing units shall conain a medrod or a procedure acceptable to the County to eNrsure trat the proposed o$site affordable irousing units ire available for sale or for rental pro rata with the sale or the rental of thc lots contained wifdn the project parccl. Said proportion of affordable housing units to Ore project parcel units strall be deterrrined in accordance with the formulas sst forth in Section 4.07.15.01 and 5.09.05.01. Couroutation ofRequired Affordabte Housinq Units and Mix of Housing Units; (l) Determination ofNumber of Units - To comply with the requirement to provide the above percentages of affordable housing urits, the applicant shall multiply the number of affo,rdable units required W 2.6 (the average number of perso,ns in a household) and divide the result by 1.5 (the U. S. Deparment ofHousing and Urban Development oiteria of p€rsons per bedroom). The figrre derived from this formula strall be the minimum number ofbedrooms, which ttre applicant must build, in affordable housing units. Thc mix of housing tlpes will Ue deciAed by the ap'plicant. Any proposal for a unit with more than 3 bedrooms may be approved, but only after a special review to ddermine a need. (2) Detemrination of ttre Mix ofUnits - The mix of affordable housing unis for purchasc shall average a price afrordable to households at 80% of the Area Median lncome (AIv{I), as determined by the U.S. Deparunent of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and published annually. The alfordable pncc will be calculated based on principal, interest taces, insurance, and homeowner association dues not to exceed 33% of gross household income. The calculation will assune a95o/o loan-to-value, 3O-year mortgage at prwailing interest rates. The average may be achieved by providing units affordable to households baween 8l% and 120% of the AIvII in combination wittr units afrordable to households baween 60o/outd80% ofthe AMI. (3) Afforrdable Housing for.Rent - The mix of afrordable housing tnes may be satisfied by affo,rdable housing for rent if the eirtity managing the property has an interest in the property. 4.07.15.04 The affordable housing for rent shall have gross rents (rents plus utilities) not to excee d30% of gross household income. The total affordable housing unitsprovided must average a rent affo,rdable to households at 807o of the AMI as daermined by the deparunent of HUD ard published annually. The average maybe achieved by providing units affordable to households betweeo 817o and 1007o of the AMI in combination with units affor.dable to house,hotds below 807o of the AMI. (added,20D2-t}) Any fiactional affordable housing units created by the above formulas will be rounded up to the next highest numh. The applicant, at the time of submittal, must pres€Ntt for review the proposed location of the affordable housing umtq the proposed mix to satis$ the above fonrulas, all documents necesmry to cornp$ with this regulation, ttre Garfieid County Affordable Housing Guidelineg md apro,posed schedule of when the affordable housing units will be constnrcted and completed in relation to the entire project. It is the intent ofthese regulations that affordable housing units for sale and for rent are built and available for sale or rent at the sarne time that the other houses are available for sale or rent. The county strall require of the applicant security in a reasonable amount to insure that the affordable units are constucteq or some other requirement such as issuing building permits for ten fiee-market houses only after the issuance of a building permit-for one affordable housing rurit. The applicant must satisfactorily demonshate that stro/tre understands and will comply with these regulations and the Garfield County Affordable Housing Guidelines. Any Plmned Unit Development Amendment reques! which results in an increase in density, shall be zubject to these regulations. PUD PROCESSING The approval of a PUD constitutes aZone Distict Amendrnent An application for subdivision Preliminuy Plan may be cqrsidered simultaneously wift the PUD application; however, the pUD zoning decision shall be made prior to the subdivision Preliminary Plan decision. A pUD is established by rezoning an area in an existing zme district to PUD, pursuant to the provisions of this Zoning Resolution and may include an application to suMivide the prop€rty, consistentwift all applicable provisio,ns ofTitle 30, Article 28 and Title 24, Article 67, C.R.S. and Section 3:00of the Garfield County Subdivision Regulations of 1984, as amended. The County Commissioners are hereby declared to be the board authorized to review PUD applications pursuaot to Section 2447-104 (lXc), C.R.S. Each PLJD application shall be reviewed and approved" disapproved or conditionally approved by thc County Commissioners within one hundred twenty (120) days of its determination of completeness and refenal to the planning Commissiolr. The approved PUD zoning and the approved PUD PIan are inseparable and a pUD shall not be established without the approval of the related PUD Plan. The ryproved PLJD zoning md the approved PUD Plan together establish the uses permitted in lieu of the zone disrict regulations that were theretofore applicable. If PUD and Subdivision Preliminary plan are considered simulaneously, the approved Preliminary Plan must include the entire PUD. Subsequeirt final plats may Ui pfrase4-in accordance wi& the approved pf,*i"i pfr* (A. 97- 109) (amended2002-12) The above-referenced one hundred twenty (120) daS, period shall commence wheir the Planning 4.08.02 4.08.03 4.08.04 4.08.05 Deparrne,nt determines the PUD application to be completg and referral of the application is made by the Board to the Planning Commission. The Planning Deparfrnent has twenty-one (2 I ) days from the date of initial submittal to determine completeness. Ifno response is drafted by the Planning Deparuneng or its legal counsel, \\rithin the stated time period, the application shall be considered complete and the 120 day period shall cornmence on the twenty second (22) day after initial submittal. The Planning Departnent shall make every effort to review and to notify the PUD applicant of any deficienry or additional requirement; however, all additional information submitted by ttre applicant strall be reviewed and is subject to fte terrns listed he'rein. The express intention of this section is to process only complete PUD applications; however the Planning Deparunent reserves the right to request additional, pertinent information throughout the PUD review process. Any appeal of the Planning Deprrrent's daerrrination of conpleteness may be appealed to the Garfield County Zoning Boad ofAdjushnent in accordance with Section 9.04.02 of this resolution. (A. 97-109) (amended 2002-12) Ifan amendment to the Master/Comprehensive Plan is proposedas apart of&ePLJD ryplication" the,n the Planning Commission shall take actio,n on the pro,posed amendment to the Ma*erlComprehensive Plan prior to the PUD ap,plication. The Plauring Comnission s action m an ame,ndment to the Master/Co,mpreheirsive Plan shall be after a public heaing with at least thirty (30) days notice, in at leaS one newspaper ofgenaal circulation in tre County, md may be considered at the same meeting that the PUD ryplication is considered. (A. 97-109) (Amended 2000-69& 2002-t2) An aoolicant mav Drocess their application for PUD zming under this ZonneResolution separ'aie from andiri advmce of th6ii application or applications for subdivision planing under ttre Garfield County Subdivision Regulations. The olm shall show whcre within tre PUD each trm ofuse will be located and shall indicatc thc iotal-acreasJ *liich will be devoted to each use, wh'ere no subdivision oftre property is pro,posed as a Dart of *re pUO. The orecise location of each use and the location of lots, blocks or other oarcils within each area deioted to each use shall be shou,n as that rea is subdivided and platted in accordance with the Garfield County Subdivision Regulations. (A.79-132, A. 97-109) The uses bry richt, conditional useq minimum lot area, ma:<imnm lot coveragg minimum sstbaclcs, m.*r*1lui treight ofbuildinEs, and a[ odrer use and occupurryreslrictiurs applicable to any area zoned as PUDihaU be thodwhich ue approved by the Couirty Cortmission€rs at the tirie such area is so zoned Where a Preliminarv Plan application is included with a PUD application the Subdivision Resulation reouirerie,nts wifl'suoersede dre followins PUD requiierncns where the same infirmuion or'more detailed inforimation is required as i part of a subdivision application. The applicmt shall include with thc writteo requbst for PUD zoning which does-not include a sirbdivision Preliminary Plan ap,plication the-following information: (1) A statement ofthe ownership intcrest in the property to be included in the PUD urd the unittem cons€nt of all of the owners; (2) A PUD Plan indicating the broad concept ofthe proposed dwelop,ment. Such Plan strall clearly indicate: (a) The maximum number of dwelling trrits proposed within the overall'arc4 (b) The minimum acreage which wiil be dedicated to Common Open Space; (c) The tlpe ofuses proposd and the acreage devoted to each use; (d) Major intemal circulation systerns; (e) The acreage, which will be dedicated for school, sites; (D Jhg-g€neral nature and location ofcommercial and industrial useq ifany, to be locatedin the PUD; (g)..Provisioq for water, sewsr, telephone, electricity; gas and cable telwisioq ifapplicable; and (h) Other rqstictions proposed by the applicant such as building sabacks, heieht limits.acqgls requrements and grade or slope restrictions to be applied to particular areas:wnrlen rn tne torm ot a zonc dlstnct tE)il the same as, or in similar form-tq the GarfieldCounty Zoning Resolution; and (l) If-npre than one phase is proposed, a phasing plan shall be included in the apolicationthat delrneates the proposed phasing of the development. (A. 97-109) !1L+ fSP.l"I location map showing tte relationship of the site to connecting roadwayqpubllc tacllltles, commercial and cultural facilities anil surrounding land us€s; !!)_,! site map illwrating site boundaries, acreage, oristing structures md the existingzoilng; (:) A site topographic map showing at least fivc-foot contour intervals, maior vesetation elements, streams, rivetrs, ditches and areas subject to 100 year floodingi - (6) A legal description of the area that the applicant wistres to include in the pUD; (7) A written staterneNrt containing the following information: (a) An orplan*ion ofthe objectives to be achiwed by the pUD; (b) A developme'nt sglre@ldndicaling the ap,proximate dates wtren constnrction ofthevarious stages of the PUD can be expecttd to begin and be completed; (c) Copies ofmy speciql covenants, conditims and restrictions, which will sov€m the uqe-.q ocgupancy ofthe PUD; providd however, that the-applicant mEy imlposeadfitrond cov€nants, conditi_ons and restrictions on anf -paticuln arel in connection with the platting of nrch are4 (d) A list.of the ^oymgl-s.of prgpgrties located within two hundred (200) Iilet of the boundaries ofthe PUD and their addresses; (e) 4 statem€nt by a licgrsed engineer, vyift supporting calculuions anddocumentariorq which shall provide-evidehce of the foilow-ir (A. 97i0ti (i) panroposed water source legally & physically adequate to service thePUD; (ii) The proposed method of sewage reifin€nt leeally and ohvsicallv adeouate to service the PUD. Ifthe PUD application oroiosbs to uhfize oristine-'central facilities, ttre application shall'rbntain a lemlr from the distria or-rrr.,riJofacilities, &e application stral from the district or-frovidertlrat adequate -elcesq capacity currently ocists and wili be aeiotea t6 accommodaturs the develooment or flrat the canacifv will he p.rn*nded rnaccommodating the development pr trat the capacity_will be e:ganded toaccorrmooaEng rne oevetopmenq or uat tne capacrtv !r adequately accommrodate the development; (A. 97-109) (iiD The proposed mettrod in whictr storm drainase wilr be handled- gffi?3$I,*ijlf,if$?:it6f'*ry owners wourdiot be damaged bv thi 4.08.06 4.09 4.09.01 4.09.02 4.09.03 4.09.M 4.09.0s 4.10 (iv) The proposed method in which provision will be made for any potential natural hazards in the area such as avalanche areas, landslide areas, flood plain areas, and unstable soils, and the extent and mitigation of such hazard(s); (A.97-109) (fl Easements showins vested leeal access for inpress and egress frorn a public road to the PUD and/or d&umentati6n demonstratini access sf,At Ue acquired across a public right-of-way or easement witrin two (2) years ofanyPUD approval and said-access sh-all be vested prior to final platting ofany property subject to the easerne,lrt across the rightof-way; (A. 97-109) and (e) Evidence ttrat ttre PUD has been desimed with consideration of the natural environment ofthe site and the sunoundiig area and does not unreasonably destoy or displace wildlife, natural vegeuilion or unique natural or historical features. The applicant may submit ury other information or extribits, which she/he deemspertinent in waluifing his prr5posed PUD. (A. 79-132) Notwithstandine the rezonins ofan overall area as PUD. no portion thereof shall be used or develooed untila siened sub6ivision plat for said porti6n slidl have been approved by the County Commissioiers as if require'rl by the Gaifield County SuMivisioif Reguladons. (arreniled 2oo2-12) DEVELOPMENT IN STAGES The aoolicant must besin develooment of&e PUD wiftin one (l) lrer from the time ofits final iohe chanse appr6val: provided, howeve,r, that the PUD mavbE developed in stages md fte Board may ippfove the cbmme,ncirnent ofdeveloprnemt activity beyond one (l) fier. The aoolicant muit'cbmolae the develoomeirt of each-stace and of tha PUD as a whole in sirbstantial compfiahce with the twelopment schEdule approvcd by ttre County Cornmissioners. (A. 97-109) Ifthe aoolicant does not comolv with the time limits imposed brv Ore p,recedine subsecti@, the Countd tommissioners strall iwiew the PUD in a riublic hearini noticeil as required in Secdoh 10.04.01, and may revoke approval for the'uncomplaed-portion of the P-UD, or require that the PUD be auiende( q ocend the time for coqiletion 6fthe PUD one (1) timg for a period not to o<ceed o,ne (l) year frour the ocpiration of the original time limit. (A. 97- 109)' Each stage within a PUD shall bv so planned md so relatcd to odsting surrounding and available-facilities and services thit failure to proceed to a subsequent stage will not have a substantial adverse impact on the PUD or its surroundings. If a PUD contains nonresidcntial uses thw may by confircted in advancc ofresidential uses if the Counv Commissioners find thit stich phaiine is co,nsistent with sound principlcs of ordered dev6lopment andwill have no substantid a&ene effecton the qualityoi chricterof thePUD. The develooment and construction ofand within all PUDs shall be done in such marrer amd fashion thdt minimizes disturbance to adiaceirt land uses and owners. Access for all construction equipment shall be designated-within the PUD proposal and strall bear a logical relationship to any proposed phasingofttte dwelopment. MAINTENANCE OF COMMON OPEN SPACE The Conmron Open Space of a PUD may be owned and maintained by fte propsrty own€rs within the PUD-or bv an oreanization ihose,lr therefrom or thereb,rr. In tlie event that the orsanization estabtisfted to -own and maint ;n Common Oeen Sbace. or any successor orEanizatioru shall at any time after establishment of the PUD fail t6 maintain the Common Oftn Space'in reasonable order and condition in accordance with the Plan, thc County Cimmiisioners may serve written notice upon such orgmization or upon fte residcns ofth-e 4.1I 4.r2 z- 4.12.01 4.12.02 4.12.03 PUD setting torth the mann€r in which the organization has failed to maintain the Conimon Qpgn Sppe in reasonable condition, and said notice shall include a demsrd tht s11tiideficiencies ofmaintenance be cured wiftin 30 days thereofand shall state tre date and place of a hearing thereon which shall be held within.la days ofnotice. -At such hearin[tre e6unty Commissioners maymodi$rthe terms ofthe originalhotice as to deficisncies ard"mar sivi anextension oftime withi4 which they shall be curEd. Ifthe deficiencies set fortU in tnti ojieinanotice or in the modifications theieof are not cured within said 30 days or anv e*tenTion granted, thg County Commissioners, in order to preserve the taxable valires ofth'e propertiei within the PUD and to prwent the Common Opi:n Space from becoming a ptblic nuisance, may enter upon said Cormnon Open Space anil maintain the same for ipeiioa of one vear. Said entry and maintenance shallnot v-est in the public any rights to use the Common 6pen Spqce exc€pt when the same has been voluntaily dedicatedto the public bv the ownlrs. Before the expiration of said year, the County Cotmissioners shall, upon their initiartive or upon tre wriusn request ofthe organization dieretofore respcnsible fordre maintenmce ofthe Common Open Sp-ace, call a public hearing upon notice to such organization- or to the residents ofthe PUD, to be h-eld by the Coun'tv Commissioners, at-which heirine such organization or the reside,nts of thePIJD shall dhow cause why such maintenancetrv the County_Commissio-ners shall not, at ttre election ofthe County Commissioners, continue fora succeeding year.. If qt" Corurty Commissroners strall daermirie that such organi.rtion is ready and able to mainr^in said Common Opeir Space in reasonable condition- the Counv Commissioners shall ceqse to maintain strth Common Ooen Space at the end o-fsaid vear. ff the County Commissioners shall deterrrine such orgdnization is not ready and hUe to maintain said Commm Open-Space in a reasonable condition, the Cowrty Cbmmissioners may, in their discretion, continue to maintain said Common Open Space durins the next stcceeding year, and srbject to a similar hearing and determination" in- each war ihereafter. The cost of such maintenance bythe County Connnissioners shall be assesssd to and paid by the owners ofproperties wittrinihe PUD trat have aright ofenioyment ofttreCommcir Oeen lpace,amd any rmp-aid assessments shall become a tai lien od siid pr_operties. The Codnty Commissioners shall file a notice of such lien in the office ofthe Gaitreld Countv Clerk anil Recorder upon the properties affected by srch lien within the PUD and shall6erti& such Inp+d as-sPssments Qr collection, enforcemeng a'Ld rernitance in the manner providedty law fof the collection, enforcmmt, andrmittance ofgmoal propsrytaxes. FEE The County Commissioners may establish a fee schedule for PUD applications to cover the ffH&tg"ff&T3g-ad rwiew in addition or the fee required for-fnccessing other Zone ENFORCEMENT AND MODIFICATION OF PROVISIONS OF THE PLAN The provisions ofthe Plan relating to the use ofland md the location ofCommon Open Soace shall run in favor of the County and shall be enforceable in law or in equity by ttle Coirnty without limitation on any pow&s or regulation othernrise granted by hd- All provisions of the Plan shall nrn in favor of the residents, occupants and owners of the PUD, but only to the exent expressly provided in the Plan and in aj,:ordance with the tenns ofthe Pla{.u an4 to $at ex_tent, sraid piovisions, whether recorded bry plar, covenant, easem€nt or otlrerwise, may be enfqrced at l-aw or in equitv bry such residtints. occuDants or owneni acting individually, jointly or through an organizitioir designated in ilhe Plan to act on theii AII those provisions ofthe Plan authorized to be e,nforced by the County may be modifie( removed rir released by the County, subject to the followingi (1) No modificatioq removal or retease of the provisions of the Plan bv &e Countv shall affect the lighs oftle residentg occupants and dwners ofthe PUD to mainain and e-nforce Urose provrsrons at law or m equrty; an<t (2) No subsantial modifications, rcmoval o,r relcase of the provisions of thc Plan bv the County shall be permitted except upon a finding by dre Coun[y, following a public hel,ring 4.12.04 4.t2.05 called and held in accordance with the provisions of Section 2447-104. C.R.S., that the Dreservation of the entire PUD does not-affect in a substantially adverse manner either the bnioyment of land abutting upon or across a sfieet from the PUD, or the public interesg and is no:t franted solely to con6r a special benefit upon any person. (3) If time-share or fractional ownership units or othel similar interest in property are ir6oosed after PUD zonine is eranted bv thb Boad ofCounW Commissioners, an application Ioriuch designation shallionlain unanimous approval of all owners ofrealprope4ywithin thePUD. (A.97-109) (4) No modification removal or release of a TPUD plan shall be permitted which would iairse anv conflict with the ooeration or utilization ofthe adiacent Mass Transit Facility or with anvbf the standards contained in Section 5.l l et scq. ofthis zoning resolution. (addod z}oz-rb Residents and owners ofthe PUD mar/. to the extent and in the manner anpressly authorized by the provisions ofthe Plau modi&,iLmove or release their rights to enf&ce the provisions ofttre Ptan" but no such acticrh shall -affect the right ofthe Counf to enforce the provisions of the Plan. PROVISION FOR INDEPENDENT OR OUTSIDE LEGAL AND/OR TECHNICAL E)(PERTISE The County Comnissioners acknowledge and fin4 ttrat, from time to time, the Cor.rn$ may be reouired to obtain indeoendeirt or oufside leeal and technical counscl and/s opinrons coicernine PUD or TPub oroposals. The Coui'ty Commissioners shall hsve the auth-ority to retain theft exDerts or orriertii:e at the sole cost-of the PUD or TPLJD applican(s). After referral, the B6ard may rthio assistance if requested by the"lqpldng Commissioq or to ad&ess any unforeseei technicd or legal issu6, not previously foreseen. At such time of retention o,'f outside exocrtise. the PUD-or TPUD applicant shall be advised of the n*ure of the outside expert revidw and-a payneirt schedule shall be establistred. (A 97-109) (mended 2002-12) AFFORDABLE HOUSING GUIDELINES Purchasing or Selling Aflordable Housing Units - Oualifications to Rent orto Purchase Affordable Housing Units (l) Qualification Criteria To quali$ for and be eligible to rent or purchase an affordable housing uniq a person rnlullt meet the following criteria: 4.t4 4.14.01 (a) employed full time or reside firll time in Garfield County, or have an offcr of . firture emplo nent tom a Garfield County based employer; a pcrsm is employed full time if the person works or will work at least 32 hours per week fora Garfield Countybased employnent souroe; a full time residcntis a p€rson who lives in Garfield Cormty ten months or more out of each year and will occupy the affordable house ten months or more out of each year; priority will be given to employees orfirturc employeesofaGarfieldCoutty based ernployer, which is an cmployer or business having a business office, store or facility located in Garfield County at which the employee r€ports to work or fiom which dre employee is compensate4 whatrer ornot the work is perfomred in Garfield County. occxpy the unit as a primary residence upon purchase or rental of the unit; and (c) have a current household net worth, minus qualified retirement assetq not. in excess of$100,000.00; if a person owns real estate, the value ofthe real estate will be based on the current market value minus ttre loan arnount balance; only those p€rsons earning 80% or less of the Area Median lncome [AMI], as determined by the U.S. Departnent ofHousing and Urban development and published annually, may qualifr to purchase a house which has been priced based on 60o/oto 80% of AM; those persons earning between greater ttran 80% and,l2}o/oof AMI may onry qualiS to purchase those affordable housing units which have been priced based on greater than 80% to l20o/o of AMI; those persons earning between greater than 120% and up to 1650/o of AMI may only qua[ry to purchase those affordable housing units which have been priced based on greaterthan l?0o/oto t65% of AMI; income includes but is not limited to salarieg w4ges, commissions, serrerance pay, royaltieE rents, trust incomg annuities, capital gainq pensions, retirement benefits, pa)ments received as an independent contactor for labor or senrices, bonuses, tipq overtime pay, diiridends, gambling proceeds, mon€ys drawn by a self-ernployed individual for personal use, social security benefits, worker's compensation b_enefifs, unemploymant insurance benefitl disability inzurance benefits, firnds payable from any healt\ accidelrq or casualty insurance to the elcent that such insurance replaces wages or provides income in lieu ofwageg mooetary gifts, mometary prizes, tamble distributions from parurerships or corporations and alfunony; a person who is not divorced but is separated from the person's spouse may exclude the spouse's income but only if the couple intends to permanently live separate and apart; a divorced pareNrt who has parenting time with his children but with whom the children do not primarily reside may claim a household which includes the chil&en. (2002-39) (2) Non-Qualification Ifthe Garfield County Housing Authority determines that an applicant does notmeet the criteria for qualification for an affordable housing unit, the Housing Authority will promptly provide the applicant with a written notice of the determination. The notice will contain a brief staternent ofthe reason(s) for fte decision, and will state that the applicant may request a review of the decision by following the grievance process described in Section Eleven of ttrese guidelines. (3) Eligibility and hiorities Eligibitity for affordable housing will be made wittrout regard to race, colu, creed, religion, sex, handicap, disability, national origl& familial status, or marital status. (b) (a) All complete applications will be assigned by the Housing Authority to one of two Priority Categories: (i) Priority Category One: A prospective owner or renter is an employee of a Garfield Cotmty based employer; (ii) Priority Category Two: A prospective owner or renter is a resideirt of Garfield CorurtY. (b) Ifttre ap,plication of a prospective owner or re,nt€r falls into both of the Priority Categories One and Two, that application shall be considered to be in Priority Category One. Ifan application does not meet thc criteria of eithcr Pridty Category, that applicant strall not be eligible for an Afrordable Housing Unit. ( c) All completed and verified applications shall be plabed in the Lottery for Affordable Housing. (4) Lottery The Garfield County Housing Authority will conduct a lottery for each Affordable Housing Unit or goup ofUnits as th€y become available. No waiting list will be maintained and anew and sepuate application mustbe submitted for each newly available Unit or groups ofUnits. To assure that the hiorities designated herein re use{ the Garfield County Housing Authority shall conduct the Lottery for available Affordable Horsing Units as follon's: (a) The Lottery shall include all applications, which are submitted md cornplae as of the date designaed by the Housing Authority. (b) All complete applications, which fall into Priority Category One sha[ be included in Lottery Round One. Each ap,plicatioq upon being drawn by random selectioru shall be assigned a numerical position based upon the order &awn. (c) Following the random drawing and assignment of a nurnerical positio,n for the applications in PriorityCategory I in Lottery Round One, a s€,prate random drawing Lottery Round Two, shall be conducted in a similar manner for ftc applications in Priority Category 2. A numerical position strall be assigned to each application in Lottery Round 2 based upon the mder drawn in a random selection. (d) Available Affondablc Housing Units and the first choice of an available Unit will be offsred to the qualified applicant first drawn in Lottery Round One. 4.14.02 4.t4.03 Subsequent offers will be made to other qualified applicants in the order drawn in Lottery Round One. (e) Remaining Affordable Housing Units, if any, wil be offered to applicants in the order drawn in Lottery Round Two following those in Lottery Roundone. (0 The GarEeld county Housing Authority shall designatq by appropriate regulatiorq the length oftime an offer of an Affordable Housing Uniishall be available to an applicant before the offer is considered withdrawn or void. If an offer is not acce,pted by a ready and willing applicant within the designated time, the offer shall be considered withdrawn and an offer to the next sequential qualified applicant based upon the Lottery, shall be made. Oualifications to Reside in an Affordable Housing Unit To remain eligible to reside in an affordable housing unit, apersog must meet the following criteria (l) To reside in a rental unit, she/he must meet the requirernents of Section 4.14.01(l), (2), and (3); and (2) Udts for Purchase (a) To reside in apurchase unit, shelhe must meet the rcquireme,nts of Section 4.14.01(l) and (2). (b) All sales of atrordabte housing units mus occur pursuant to these regulations. How to Oualifv for Affordable Housing Unit (Renal or purchase) ( I ) Initial Qualification In order to detennine that a person or a household desiring to purchase an affordable housing unit meets all ofthe criteria set forth in Section I abovg the Garfield County Housing Authority may request any combination, or all, ofthe documentation listedbelow as proof ofresidency, incomg asssts, and employment (with the provision that all information and documenadon is considered confidential). (a) Federal income tal( returns for the last two-(2) years (for prospective purchasers). Prospective ptrchasers must also firnistr a current income statement and a current financial statement, in a form acceptable to the Garfield County Housing Auttro,rity, verified by ttre applicant to be tue and corect, or other documentation acceptable to the Housing Authority. Whem cur€nt income is twenty (20W p€rcqrt, more or less, than income reported on ta( returns, then the applicant's income will bc averaged based upon the current income and ttre prwious year's ta( returns to establish an income category for the purpose ofpurchasing or ofrenting an affordable housing unit. (b) Verification of employment or of[er of employment in Garfield County (i.e-, wage stubs, employer name, address, and phone number), plus wide,nceof legi residencyionl.N.S. Form 1-9, Employment Eligibility Verification) or otho "ppropriutl documentation as requestedby ttre Garfield County Housing Authority. (c) Landlord verification (proof of resid*"y, physical address). (d) Copy of valid Colorado Driver's License' (e) Verification oftelephone service (date of installatiorU p€rson listed to). (g) Voter regstration. (h) AnV other documentation which thc Garfield County Housing Authority deems necessary to make a determination' (i) Dvorce or Support Decree. Ifyou receive any sort of alimo'ny or gnilj sup'porg a copi of the decree must indicate Orat it has been e,ntered of recor4 and all exhibits md supplements must be attached' 0) Cunent oeditrePort (2) Additional Qualifications for hrchasers ofan Affordable Housing Unit The applicant desiring to purchase an affordable horsing unit will be required to sign- a release-so that the Garfieli County Housing Authority carr obtain a copy ofthe completed loan application submitted to the lender. 4.t4.04 (t) Listing the Affordable Housing Unit wittr thc Garfield Couty Housing Authority' StaffDuties (a) Initial sales of affordable horsing turits will be ttre responsibiliU-9fthe developer. The purchase price, deed restriction, qualification ofbuyer, and all ot6er aspects of tre sale must comply with the Garfield County Affordable Housing Regulations and with these Guidelines' O) After the initial sale of an affordable housing unit, any subseq-uet{ owner of an affordable housing trnit desiring to sell must consult with the Garfield County Housing euttrority and review the Deed Restriction covering the housing unit to daermine the ma,ximum sales price permitted and other applicable provisions concerning a sale. Unless otherwise provided in theDeed Restrictiorq the affordable housing unit must be listed for sale *itU tt "Garfield county Housing Authority. The Housing Authority satrwili - - administer the sale in accordance with the Guidelines in effect at ttre time of the listing. There shall be a minimum listing period of three months before an affordable housing unit's pricc can be readjised. Any termination in tlre listing may require the payment of adminiJtrative andlf advertising costs. (c) Prospective purchasers will register in person at the housing authority office. (d) These Guidelines are intended to assure thd all purchasers and all sellers will be treated fairly and rmpartiatly. Questions will be answered and help will beprovided equally to any potential purchasers o'r sellers in accordance with the current Guidelines. Listings, sales contract$ ortensions to contracts, and closing documents will be prepard; and all actio,ns necessary to consummate the sale shall be undertaken. (e) hr pursuitof tfre abovg the Garfield County Housing Authority staffwil be acting on behalfofthe Housing Authority. It should be clearlyunderstood by and between all parties to a sales transaction that the staffmembers are not acting as licensed brokers to the transactiorq but as representatives of&e Garfield County Housing Authority md its interesrc. They shal nevertheless attempt to he$ both parties to consurnmate a fair and an equitable sale in accordance with the our€nt Guidelines. (D All purchasers and sellers are advised to consult legal counsel regarding e>ramination of the title md all ofthe contracts, agre€Nrreo6, ana-titte - docunents. The rete,ntion of counsel, licensed real estate brokers, or such related send_ces, strall be at a purchaser's or seller's own expense. The fees paid to the Garfield County Housing Authority re to be paid regardless of' any actions or services that the purchaser or seller.ry *a"rt"ti or acquire. (2) Advertising For Resale (a) After an affordable housing unit is listed for sale with the Garfield County Housing Authority, the Housing Authority will anange to advertise the unit for sale. Pricing for the resale urit will be co,nsistent with fte deed restiction appreciation caps. (b) Prospective purchasers are e,ncouraged to investigate sources of financing prior to submitting an offer for an affordable housing unit and can obtain- names oflenders from the Housing Office. (3) Sales And Other Fees (a) Sales Fees (i) unless otherwise set forth in the Deed Restrictions covering the affordable housing unig at the crosing of the salg the selreiwill pay the Garfierd_9*,v Housing Authority a sares fee equar to two anione{uarter Q u4o/o) p€rcsnt ofthe sares price. Ttrebarfierd countyHousing futhority may instnrct the Title bo-p*y to pay fire rees tothe Housing Authority out ofthe f,nds herd roi oe seier at the closing. (ii) unlel otheirvise specified in the Deed Restriction, a one-harf(llZyg.prcTr fo is paid by the seller at the time of listing which is ryplied to the totar sares fee payabre at crosing. ri-rhe event that the seller frils to perform under the listing drt r"t, rejects an offers at the maximum price in cash or in cash- ' equivale'nt t€mnsi or should withdraw the listing after advertising has commenced, that portion ofthe fee will norbe refi,rded. tri the event tt* the sefler witrdraws for frirure of any bids to bereceived at themaxim,m price or with acccptabre temrq dre advertising and the adminisrativc costs incurrea by the Garfield county Housing Authority shall be deducted from the foe, with' the balance ctedited to the owner's sales fee whe,n the affondable housing tmit is sold. (b) Ottrer Fees (i) unless otherwise set forttr in the Deed Restriction covering the unigupon &e initiar salg resalg or refinmcing ofthe "ro"ar.ur" rru si";unitwhererNMA-type finmcing provisilons are used (the use of - which shall be at the sole discretion ofttre Garfield cormty HousingAuthority), there shall be a onequarter (rt4vopercat tee crrargediy the Housing A,thority. The fee shalr be paid'ty tn" -ortgaor, based on the anrount.of the mortgagg paid for of, _oagqg, t rosactio4 and deposited in the Garfield county Housing autf,oiitymootgage' reserve fund account. The purchaser of the ahordabre [ourin[,iit shall also pay the fee based ur their mortgage, as sa forth above. (ii) lfthe fee is paid on an af[ordable housing unig and the housing unitis subsequently refinance4 the fee shall iity qrpryto ur"t amount ofthe refinanced mortgage greater than the iniiaLrir6rtgage upon which the fee was initiafly coflected. FNIvIA-trpe financini provisions are those, which provide, among ottrer things, for the reiova of theDeed Restriction_9n tr: *i, upon foreclos,re oftrre mortgage iftheGarfield county Housing Authority, ttre city, or the county does notorercise ttreir opion to purchase ttre affo,rdable housing unit within aspecified time following the foreclosure. If FNMA-trrpr il;; - provisions yg not used by the mortgagm, no fee shaf L chargedfo the Garfierd countyHousing AuthJriry. rrr. amount and trre adequacy ofthe fee and the mortgag" reserve fimd sr,il be reviewed - annually as part of the review of the Guidelines' (a) Deed Restriction The purchaser must execute concurrent with the closing of th91ale, in a form satisfactory to the GarfielA County ffousing Authority and to the Garfield County Clerk for recording' a docgment acknowledgin! OJpurctraser's agreement to be bound by the recorded Deed Resriction covering fti sale of the affordable housing unit. (5) Additional lnformation: Co'ownership and co-signing (a) fury co-ownership interesg other than joint tenatrcy or tenancy-in-coiltmon''-' *rir, be ap,provi by the Garfield County Housing Authority- @) co-signors may be approved for ou,nership of the_affordable housing unit, but shall not occupy tne ^unit unless quatified by ttre Garfietd county Housing AuthoritY. (c) Rentals (i) If an afforrdable housing rmit is listed for sale and the owner must relocate to another.t"i ,t " housing unit may, upon appr-oval ofthe GarfieldCorrntyHousingAuthority,bererrtedtoaqualified individual, in accordancl with the Guia"fines, for a ma:rimum perid oftvr,o(2)yers.Noticeofsuchinterrt,andtheabilityto rf,Jf Ui iri,"ided to any applicable hemeowner's association q tt'" time of request to the c"rhba county Housing Authority. A letter mustbe r*t to the Garfietd county Housing Auttrority requesting permission to rent the affordable fousing unit until g: yit is sold' A .l"i-.* six (6) months writte,n lease must be provided to. the tenalrt, *itl " sixty (Objdaymove out clatrse, upon ryti{cgqqr when the rmit is sold- All tenmts'must be qualified by the Garfield county Housing Authority. (ii) The affordable housing unit ryrst be]eased for the tef,ms set forth in the Deed Restrictio,n oi tl" unit or, ifthere are no such provisions in the Deed Restriction, upon tenns approvedbythe Garfield Cotmty ftorsing Authority. irri'or to the Garfield County Housing Authority's q""lin;nio" of aienant, the tenant shall acknowledge as part of the llase, that the tenant has receive4 read" and undostands the- homeowners'associationcovenants'rulegandregulationsforthe affordable housing unit and shall abide bythem. Enforcement of the cov€nmts, rules, ird regulations shall be the responsibility of 6,c homeowners' associatiJn. A copy ofthe executed lease shall be fumished by the own€r or tenani io the Garfield county Housing Authority and to the homeowner's association' 4.14.05 4.t4.06 4.14.07 Execution of Deed Restictions by Applicants Deed Restrictions must be sub,rnitted by the applicant to the Carfield County Housing Authority according to the time schedule listed below. (l) At the Time of Building Permit Prior to iszuance of any building permit for a project, the Garfield County Housing Authority shall have an approvd execute4 and recorded Deed Restriction for the required commitnent by ttre applicant. A copy of the recorded Land Use Code Resolution and tre Deed Resriction shall be sent to the Garfield County Housing Authority. (2) At tre Time of Certificate of Occupancy hior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the Deed Resriction strall be amended, if necessary, to reflect the changes approved by the Garfield County Housing Authority, which may havc occurred during constmction on co,nversion of thc affordablc housing unit (i.e., net livable square footage). In addition, the Deed Restriction shall be executed and recorde4 with the original returned to the Garfield County Housing Authority for their files. Prio,rities for Persons Desirine to Purchase an Affordable Housing Unit Priorities for persons to purchase an afrordable housing unit shall be as listed below. (l) Person(s) with a pres€nt ownership interes (joint or t€nants in common) in the affo,rdable housing rurit. (2) Person(s) chose by the remaining owner(s) to purchase the intereS of another owner. ery t""tiorral sales must be approved by Special Review, ifnot under a court order, due to dissolution procedues. (3) Spouses or childreir of current own€rs including joint custody ofthe children. (4) A qualified brryer on first come, first serrre, basis with preference given to an employee of a Garfield County based enrployer. Ma:<imum Vacancy of an Affordable Housint Unit for Refl! Deed restricte.d affordable rental units, which are required to be occupied" may be vacant between tenancies for a maximum perid of fo4y-five (45) days, unless authorized by the Garfield County Housing Authority. If the owner orceeds the forty-five- (a5) day limit without the Garfield County Housing Authority's approval the Housing Authority will place a qualified tenant, with a mininum six- (6) month's lease, ftom tlre existing waiting list. Leave of Absence for Ovmers of an Affordable Housing Unit4.14.08 4.t4.09 (1) Rental During a Leave of Absence If an owner of an affordable housing rmit must leave Garfield County for a limited period of time, and desires to rent the unit during their absence, a leave of absence may be granted by the Garfield County Housing Authority for up to one (l) year upon clear and convincing evidence which shows a bona fide reason for leaving and a commitnent to return to the Garfield area A letter must be s€Nrt to the Garfield County Housing Authority, at least thirty (30) days prior to leaving, requesting perrrission to renithe unit during ttreir leave of absence. Notice of such intent, and the ability to commeNrt, shall b€ provided to any applicable homeowners' association at 6e time oirequest to th; Garfield County Housing Authority. (2) Extension of a Leave of Absence The leave of absence strall be for one (l) year and may, at the discretion ofthe Garfield County Housing Authority, be extended for onc (l) year; but in no event shall the leave exceed two (2) years. The rmit may be rented in accordance with the Garfield Colnty Housing Authority's Guidelines for qualification during the one- (l) or two- (2) year P€riod, so long as the Deed Restriction covering the affordable housing unit permits ttre rental. (3) Establishing the Rental Rate In the eve,nt that the rental rate is not set forth in the Deed Restrictiorq the rent shall be established at the greater ofthe owner's cost, or the rent shall be established in acco_rdance with the Affordable Housing Grridelines. The owner's cost, ,ls used herein, includes the monthly mortgage principal and interest pa)4nent, plus condominium fees, plus utilities rernaining in the owner's namg plus ta:res md insurance prorated on a monthly basis, plu twenty ($20) dollars per month. (4) Covenants, Rules, and Regulations hiorto the Garfield County Housing Authority's qualification of the te,nan! the tenant shall acknowledge, as part ofthe lease, that the tenant has received, read, and understands the homeowners' association covenants, rules, and regulations for the affordable housing unit and shall abide by them. Enforcernent ofthe covenantq rules, and regulations shall be the responsibility ofthe homeowner's association. A copy of the executed lease shall be furnistred by the owner or the tenant to the Garfield County Housing Authority and the homeowners' association. Additionally, an owner mayrequest a one-time, in-countyleave of absence for one (l) year by Special Review wi*l all of the above conditions applylng. Roommates Unless otherwise set forth in the Deed Restriction or covenants of the Homeownetrs' Association covering the affordable housing unit, an owner may rent an affo,rdable unit/room so long as the owner continues to reside in the housing unit as a sole and exclusive place of residence. 4.14.10 (l) The Garfield CountyHousing Authority will consider a developer's proposal for units with four, five, or six bedrooms by a Special Review. The Special Review process will evaluate the need for the multiple bedroomunitsbased upon the intended family composition. The Special Review requires ttrat trere must be at least one bedroom of appropriate size for every two persons in the frmily. The following chart shdl be applied in the request for a Special Review. Number of Bedrooms 0 - sttrdio I 2 3 4 5 6 Minimum Persons I I 2 3 4 5 6 Maximum Persons 2 2 4 6 I l0 t2 (2) The determination ofthe intended family composition will includc the following: foster children, live-in attendants, dependents under the age of 23 who are away attending school, and family members who re away oo military leave or out-of-town business asslgnment. 4.14.11 , Grievance Procedures A grievance is any dispute that a tenant or purchaser may have with thc Garfield County Housing Authority with respect to action or failure to act in accordance with the individual tenant's or purchasetr's rights, duties, welfare, or stans. A grievance may be preseirted to the Gar6eld County Housing Au*rority Board of Directors (herein after referred to as Board) under the following procedures. (l) Filing a Grievance (a) Any grievance must be presented in writing to the Garfield County Housing , Authority. It may be simply statsd, but shall specify the particulr ground(s) upon which it is based; the action requested; and the name, address, and telephone number of the complainanq and simila information about hisrlrer representative, if any. (b) Upon presentation of a written grievance, a hearing before the Garfield Cormty Housing Authority Board of Directors shall be scheduled forthe next (2) scheduled Board meeting. The matter may be continued at the disuetion of the Board. The complainant shall be afforded a fair hearing providing the basic safeguard ofdue process, including notice and an opportunity t; be heard in a timely, reasonable manner. (c) The complainant and the Garfield County Housing Authority shall have the opportunity before the hearing and at the expense of the complainant, to exarnine and to copy all documentq records, and regulations of the Garfield County Housing Auttrority trd are relevant to the hearing. Any document not made available after written r€quest may not be relied upon at the hearing. (d) The complainant maybe represexrted by cormcil athis or her own expense. Conduct ofthe Hearing (a) If ttre complainant fails to appear at the scheduled hearing the Board may make a determination to postpone tre hearing or make a determination based upon the written documentation and the evidence submitted. (b) The hearing shall be conducted by the Boad as follow: oral or docgmentary evidence may be received without strict compliance with the rules of evidence applicable to judicial proceedings (c) The right to sls5s-g;amine shall be at the discretion of the Board and may be regulated by the Board" as it deems necessary for a fair hearing. (d) Based on the records of proceedingq the Board will provide a written decision and include therein the reasons for its daermination. The decision of the Board shall be binding on the GarEeld countyHousing Authority, which shall take all actions necessary to carry out the decision. ,unty Zone Districts, cinrty of Town of New Castle, fiield County, CO bgcd ] at loriuamurrausna I enRO AgtkilfrMt/ResbentayRuntDensity I co commeobYceml r r CrTY/TOWN I ca \ amr) imited , os vpersprE P.JO Phnnd Unl Deve@rcnt ffi nOUo Rrirenlsl/Gffidyu,ban Deorltv ffi nr-so Rgrlqtullif,iled/aLD,utbilDooty f nr-uo B6irenri,nffidvttun DactY ! nuxoruo R*idntiayMobb Hoopcoaaautbn Deotf V7 suan*on otethy slon ow q&tUW zqhg ffrf&ffiE t.cBtutffiDFturhhh@I rcw8olffe t.u3G t@?re-44dl@E4fi ahffidI.6G-(E tffi6rn,ErffiEdoa((il6riElF .ds-oE' es,rdtt County Iar t6tan 6@ttei {uElWElt@ u u[reI ootlfEt'llxtE vail t olarua Bqfr lonls iltv1d 0001J frwlmrl ff ltlll ootuE aa-u@ -:- od006rr.E ffi[wffrutxqatredru Eq-lffrryI ,11 6rata .r&r --fr,e &Dt.r om$ -F rr& rorlr. o@ + ' tlll totlrn .:-.m.Effi i I 't t-' M 'E I:1*O Hl- .ru Eare- t'lao + I I!E@i[ . re'x twrau o..rc.a I' clI6fi olEH ttil €lti Iattl txJttt a.ar .t aDl,lodBi rE aat'arri to.raa r'd ldttrr1 ,tttrtI 0 . ilJm1 ttlttL: aaa.&I ,aadD . @ f,&rr1 Iueiaxr*dt .lb'ilt rn :---6.i'. i- -\ r.'rolr I ,h;-=.reror , -n-jili -\-- 40.!----i6-\'3#sij .!!!$i.i + #i,il \ tr raa'ort Ila'&l aalf, iabarl taa/lat aaca I I ! J atllr.r ,a*ffr au .s.:r.ij , r#*ij rrqqry;t_E_r-F g3;g; jlEtILlf--E EqEEi__-Eq u.+UffisH -5 rr.relu ,.+&U -.- &]!rfl t{cr!t. ot ra'l tt0.6a tal. I / It t rydffi.-_- &8il' - st 1- ffirrll {- soroarr t (&ltrJr t IIVITLEA4ENTATION PLAN AND SCHED ATTACHMENT SU PPLEM ENTAL I N F O RMATI O N Public Water Systeln - The Rapids on the Colorado, Garfield County, 1. State of Colorado WQCD Letter Approving Water System Design 2. State of Colorado WQCD Letter Assigning PWSID No. CO 0123668 3. Letter - Professional Engineer - Certifying That Rapids System Constructed as WQCD Approved 4. Water Quality Analytical Reports ATTACHMENT 4 August 7,2N6 Public Health Engineer Dtinkingwatet Progtam Watet Quatity Conuol Division Colomdo Dept of Public Health 4300 Cherry Creek Dtive South Denvet, CO 802,+61530 SUBJECT: RAPIDS ON THE COI.ORADO SUBDTVISION, GARFIELD COUNTY Dear Public Health Engineer: The design and construction speciEcations for the water supply sFtem rcferenced above were apptoved by the Watet Q""lity Conuol Division on January 9, 1997: A PWSID number was not assigned at that time. I yrat e: do4lo engineer for this weter syst€m and I uas also the eagineer that inspected the consEuction of the vnter supply facitities in 1997. I heteby certify that the uater supply facilities for the Rapids on the Colorado Subdivision in Garfield C"*ay were built as approved by the Water Quatity Control Division. Please assign a PWSID number for this sFtem. Sincerely, Peter Belau, P.E. cc Chtis Hale, Mountain Ctoss Engineering Gene Hilton IO53 CLOUD CAP AVENUE PAGOSA SPRINGS, CO S11,+7 97 0-9 16-8595 Itrl NECTIYED JAN 2 O rggi STATE CFCCLCI\ADC I I Roy Romcr. Gcvemor Pril Slmrydcr, Erccutlvc Olrcaor b&atcd3l gotcah3 nd kagwtng 6o Aceltlr eadcnvlron mcat ol 6c pcoPtc oi Cobndo 13:lC Chcny Gccl Dr. 3. trbor.tory Bulldlnt oswcr, Colondo t0rr2.lr30 4210 [. 116Avcnuc Phoae octl6e2.2000 Big.diff,i#" t0t2o37r6 a January 9, Lgg? Peter Belau, P.E. Enartech, Inc. 302 Elghth street, Sulte 325 Glenwood Sprlngs, co 81502 , RE: Approval tor New lfater suPPlY. RaPtds on the Colorado subdlvlslon PwsfD, (To be assLgned)ctrf,Lelrr Countv CotondoDcoumcnt of ttrb[cfialth urdEnvircnmcnt Dear Peter: I have received the nitrite resanple results for l{ells tL and JZ lron tlre Gra4d Junctlon Laboratories. These resultE are below the MCL for nltrtte. I have also noged ln your letter dated ilanuary 2, Lgg7, ttrat Raplds Well 14 is nov known as Rapids t{eII 12. Ihe'two well; n6tr used for lhls subdlvislon t lll be'recorded as Raplds l{eII. Jf and Raplds t{el} *2. I have also noted fron you -lett_er .that the Dlchloronlthane found ln the conposlte sanple waa a16o lound ln the Trlp Blank, and therefore was not fron the raw rlater eource.. The plaire tpf inls water supply now neet all State Deeign Crlteria.. ... Tlie deslgn and construction speclf,ications for -thls water supply- have nov-been revLeued in aclordance with Artlclo 2.1.5 of theEl' Colorado Prlnary Drinking Water Regulations, and are hereby-'approved. Any change orders and addendums'must be subnitted to thls off,lce lor approval. Ilhen th!.s systen ls vlthln 60 days of completion, thle.offlce'DuBt be contacte--a by the proJect englneer. A representatlve of thls oepartinentnay.scheduieis1te.itsttbef,orethes1rsten1sput1ngervLce. Upon .con!r!.e.t!oI. of errnstruction, a wrltten certlfLca.tLon frou. vortr eirgitreeriig iffu.nust be'subnitied to .Ehls off lce statlng that the taatll,ty wis bullt as apProved by this offlce. Approval of, thls proJect ls based only on engineering design and tha facilltyrs aUift€y to'provide safe potable $ater,- neetlng the ,Colorado prinary orlntiing frater Regulatfons. Approval sha}l ln no vay lnf,luence local planning declCions.' Sl.ncerely, ctwafl,*'. C. O. rBud'Mahn Publla Hea1th Englne'er Orlnklng ltater Progran T{ATER QOALITY CONTROI, DIVISION col'!3 Jb/GENCOR4- cc3 Garfleld'county Health DePartBent' Dualn l{atson, Dlstrlct Enginaer' Dt{ Monltor/8lle, Erica Kannely (._ Gene Hilton From: Sent: lo: Cc: Subiect: Peter and Janna Belau [pjbetau@earthlink. net] Tuesday, August 15, 2006 4:SS pM Chris Hale gene hilton FW: Rapids on the Colorado Subdivision lnv_Nar April 2006.doc Peter Belau > [Origina] Messagel) Erom: ERICA Kannely <elkannelGsmtpgate.dphe.state.co.us>> To: <pjbelauGearthlink.net> > Date: 8/L5/2006 4:23:19 pM > Subject: Rapids on the Colorado Subdivision > The PwsrD# assj-gned to the Rapids on the colorado subdivision is> co0123668. > Please complete the attached inventory form so that I can update our) system. ) Sincerely, > Erica Kannely> Water Quality Control Division> COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & ENVIRONMENT> phone: (303) 692-3543) Eax: (303) 758-1398 http: / /www . cdphe . state . co. us,/wqlDrinking_Water,/Drinking_Water program Home. htm- trl NEW PUBLIC WATER SYSTEM THE RAPIDS ON THE COLORADO DESIGN ENGINEER'S REPORT Prepared By: Peter Belau, P.E. ENARTECH, INC. 302 8th Street, Suite 325 P.O. Drawer 160 Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 November 22,1996 ATTACHMENT C WATER QUALIW ANALYTICAL REPORTS lilicrosearch laboratory f iorosearch LaboratorY lno. 278i1 Wcbster Drivs ii i' -. --.ir, li L r:.r i,, i,n Grand Junotion, CO el503 t970l 24r -l {46 Fax (97O124t 5092 e-mail 7545O.3245@ compuserue.colrl SOURCE WATER IDENTIT'ICATION Using MPA following EPA CONSENSUS METEOI) PWSID # City/Utility The RaPids. well I Project Code- Account #Phone |o70\945'2703 Date (s) sanpted 04/09 to 04/10/96 Sampler G)aabhlstrrcI Systemtype j-nrUUc -community -Non-Community lVater Source location The Rapids Well # I Meter Reading: Beforc-After- Total volume filtered 2.052.6 sa[ons InfiltrationGatlerv ArtesianWell Conductivity T.ChIor F-Chtor OtherMB Analvsis: (darc) Visitone Visit two Total Coliform lfi) mL f,'ecal Coliform lfi)mL Eeterutmoic Plate Cmnt EL Sample Telren Fron IYatersourcelD rs: SPring Ileld Mea$rements:(date) Trrbidity PE NTU) Vrsit one Visittwo DugWell ',/ priUeaWeU HorizonalWell other lf W"U: Oeftt__:ot Distance ftom river/stream/lake--S Agency do AquaTec Svstems Inc. POBox 488 Glenwood Sprines. CO E1602 Phone (o701945'2703 Date neceive d-O4 I ll I 96-- , -other- j9go, Processine Infomation Totat Volume Flltered 2.052.6 gallons Total lilter sediment collected-lJi mls pL sedimenU lfl) gallons 77.97 PERCOLL@ / rucrcse Flotation pellet rrolume 1000 lrl, PERCOLL@ / ncrcse flotation packed sediment 30 pL pL llotation peltet volume / lfi) gallons filtercd 2.34 uL f,'lotation Parameters rl PrnCOr @ /sucrose gradient sucrcse Gradient potassium citrate fime Rcquircd 22.3 hrs ZX{SO1 -other'Direct Obervation' Page I of2 NOTE: AII Limitations of Analysis Apply. Sample ID: The Rapids. well I page2 of 2 Date o4ltot96 Analyst Carrie Howe-Carlson Dilution none Microscotry Phasdtloffrnan Mod Ootics@/Eoifluorescen* Ivlagnification 200)O1.000X - Volume Final pellet pLl:O Primen, Particulates Slide I Slide 2 Slide 3 Slide 4 Slide 5 Slide 6 Slide 7 Slide 8 Slide 9 Slide l0 Total #tt00 Gallons Risk Factor Giardia n.o.-> Coccidia n.o.-+ Diatoms n.o.-) Other Alsae n.o.+ Insect Larvae n.o.-+ Rotifers n.o.-+ Plant Debris n.o.-) Secondarv Particulates t-arge Amorphous Debris n.o.+ Fine Amorphous Debris heavy-r heavy heavy none Minerals n.o.-+ Plant Pollen n.o.-+ Nematodes n.o.-+ Crustacea n.o.+ Amoebae n.o.-+ Ciliates / Flaeellates n.o.+ 0ther: Comments: This water system has a relative risk factor d-=-o@uence of surface water NOTE: All Limitations of Analysis Apply. lTlicrosearch laboratory ficrorearch LaboratorY inc. 2783Webrter Ddve Grend Junction, OO 8t5O3 [s? Ol 2t1 -1 446 Fax (97O1241 6092 e*nail 75450.32rt5 @ compuseNe'com SOURCE WATER IDENTIFICATION Using MPA following EPA CONSENSUS METEOI) PWSD# CityrutilitY Fnartech Raoids Agency AauaTec Svsems- Inc. Project Code - Accunt #---*** (970) 984{311 Date (s) sampled O4ll5 to 4116l?6 Sampler (s)-napn S- SystemType -hrblic -:l-community -Non{ommunity Weter Smrce location--Enartech Rapids Meter Rcading: Before :17!t!el After 479.4O4 sample Taken r..-_u"u *-1- Total volume fiItcr€d r.240 galons Water smrce IID as: Spring tnftltration Gallery Artesian Well Dug W"U __J_OrifkdWell Horizontal Well other- ff Wen peeft g2 -Feet Distance from river/stream/lake- $ NewCastle. CO Phone (970) 984{3ll IDate rcceived $Ufl% Conductivity T.Chl,or X'-Chlor Eeterotr6oic Plete Cornt mL tr'leld Measrements: (date) Visit one Visittwo Oth€rMB Andvsis: (date) Tirrbidity pE (NTU) Total Coliform lfl)mI f,'ecal Coliform lil) mL Visitone Visit two Procersing Information Total Votume tr'tftered 1.240 gallons Time Reqnired 22'5 hrs Totat liher sediment coltected- :!Q-mls uL sedimenU lfi) gallons 322 PERCOLL@ / mcnose X'lotetion pellet volume l00o uL PERCOI,LO / mcnose flotation paclrcd sediment 40 pL pL flotation peltet volume / 100 getlons liltered 12.8 trl ./ PERCOI,L @ /sucrose gradient sucrose Gradient potassium citrate a{so4 -otherjDirect-Gcervation'. Page I of2 NOTE: All Limitations of Analysis Apply- SamplelD: EnartechRapids Well#4 - page2of2 Date o4116/96 Analyst Canie Howe-Carlson Dilution none Microscopy Phase/tloffman Mod. optics@/Egfluorc Magnification 200)V1.000X _ Volume Finat peuet pL_=_lQ__ Secondarv Particulates Comments This water system has a relative risk factor of nce of surface water NOTE: All Limitations of Analysis Apply. Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment - Drinking Water Section REPORTING FORM FOR NITRATE/NITRITE as NITROGEN ANALYSES SAMPLER: PLEASE FILL OUT ONE FORM - FOR EACH INDIVIDUAL SOURCE/PLANT or COMPOSITE SET YES txl or NO t I THESE RESULTS ARE TO BE USED TO FULFILL STATE SAMPLING REOUIREMENTS 3'3' IiVSTSUCr7IONS/DEFINIIIONS ON BACKOF FORM *" PWSID #: Nqq COUNTy: Garfield DATECOLLECTED. 04 I 16 I 96 SYSTEM /ESTABLISHM ENT NAME:on the Colorado Hcrnecrvmer' s Associati-on SYSTEM ADDRESS: (rnail) 2102 w. (Physical Address) flgffffiey Road 335, 1{ew cas#, CO 81641 --^ CONTACT penSON: peier eefau, hqineer' PHONE: t 970 t 945-2236 SAMPLE COLLECTED BY: Asua-Tec Svstenrs, Inc' WATER WPE: RAW uro"r-i'act:manenrr [Xl or CHLORINATED I I souRcE(s)..WCAflON(S): 'Address East r,vrell near Dr.Littleton -co 80120 T1ME COLLESIEp; 10:00 am/Eo( or OTHERTREATMENTI I $AMPW POINT(S): DO SAMPI"ES NEED TO BE COMPOSITED BY I-ABORATORY ? YES txl or NO I I For Laboratory Usc Only Bclow This Linc TABORATORY SAMPLE # 961727-1 CLIENT NAME or 19g Aqr-ra-Tec Slzsternsr Inc' LABORATORY NAME Barrinqer Laboratories, Inc- l-AB PHONE g t 3O3l 277-1687 DATE RECEIVED IN IABORATORY 04 / 17 / 96 DATEANALYZED O4 t 26 t 96 COMMENTS: PARAMETER NITRATE/NITRITE.N NITRATE.N NITRITE.N (mgfll RESULT 0.8 (ms/U MCL 10.0 10.0 1.0 EPA METHOD 353.2 lmg/ll Lab MDt 0.1 1lf = Not Tcstcd for oornpound mg/L - Milligrams pcr Litcr MCL = Madrnum Contaminant Lovel Lab MDL = Laboratory Mcthod Dctcction Limit H = Holding Timc hae bccn cxcccdcd tt t?4 76 Date MAIL RESULTS TO: Cobrado oca.ftm.nt ol Rrblic H..tth.nd Environmrnt, wocD-ow-82, 43O0 Clrcrry crcck oriw south. o'nw3, co 6(,222'r53o Rcvitcd 7/94 - J:\WRTABFORMSWITRATE.FRM colorado Department of Public Health and Environment - Drinking water SectionREPORTING FOBM FOR NITRATE/NITRITE as NITROGEN eiar-VSES SAMPLER: PLEASE FILL our oNE FoRM - FoR EAcH TNDTvTDUAL souRcEipLANT or coMposrrE sET YEs tx or No t I THESE RESuLTS ARE To BE usED To FULFTu- srATE sAMpLTNG RE.,TREMENTS - .3T3 INSTRACNONSIDENNINONS ON BACKOF FOR}fi r.., SAMPLE COTJ.ECTED gy; Aqua-Tec Systens, Inc.TIME COLtEglgg; 10:00 amtm< WATERTYPE: RAWwo.x*i.cotr:mromr[il or CHLORINATEDI I or OTHERTREATMENTI ] SOURCE(S): Rapids [rlelr No' 2 t @ ; werr head (raw water) DO SAtt'lPtES NEED TO BE COMPOSITED BY LABORATORV ? yES [xl or NO t I For Laboraory asc Only Below This Liru IABORATORY SAMPLE # 96'1727-2 CLIENT NAME or lD# Aqra-Tec Systems, Inc. ISBORATORY NAME Barringer Laboratg:ies, Inc.LAB pHONE s t 303 t 277-1687 I0CAflON(S): - Addnss West well near SAMPLE POINT(S): DATEANALrZED 04 t 26 t 96DATE RECETVED tN tjBORATORy 04 t 17 t 9G COMMENTS: PARAMETER NITBATENITRITE.N NITRATE.N NITRITE.N (mgfl) BESULT 1.0 tmgfll MCL 10.0 10.0 t.0 EPA METHOD 353.2 lmg/ll Lab MDL 0.1 I'lT = [ge1 Tcstcd for compound mg/L = Milligrarns pcr Utcr MCL = Maximum Contcminant Lcvel Llb MOL * Laboratory Mcthod Dctdction Umit H = Holding Timc has bccn cxcccdcd ll r 41 7G Date MAI! REsuLfs To: cobrado o.pritmrnt of hrblic Hcatth end Environmor{. wocD-ow-B2, €oo arcry Crcc} Driw south, Drnwr. co 8o222-ls3oRcviecd 7/94 - J:\WpILABFOFMS\N|TRAIE.FRM Golorado Dopartm6nt of Pr.6[c Hostdr and Erwironmont - Drir*ing Water Section BEPORTING FORM FOR ORIGINAL.PHASE ll,v INOBGANIC ANALYSES SAMPIIR: PI.EASE FIII OUT ONE FORM. FOR EACII INDIVIDUAL SOURCE/PI.ANT OT COMPOSTTE,SET yES lt' or NO t t THESE RESULTS ARE TO 8E USED TO Ft LFlLl STATE SAMPUNG REOUAEMEITS 3... AISIS ACmONS{DEFifi,maNS oN BACX OF FtaR ilI *tt pWSID g. New ggg155Y; Garfield DATE COTIECTEDT 04 t 16 t 96 SySTEMTESTABLISFIMB.IT pagg, The Rapiits on the Colorado Hcrneoramer's Ass'ociation sYsTEM ADDRESS: (rnail) 2102 W. Arapahoe Dr. Littleton @ 80120 (phvsical **"=JFffi€i Road 33s, r.Ier^r castg, ce---9-1!47^-^ *^ .- ^^:ctiifil6-pEil5ont-' F"t .-e"l"i,--k"i i : ftiONE: tezo I e45-2236 SAMPi]E COTIECTED 3f3 Asr-ta-Tec Svsterns, Irrc._ TIME COtf.ECfED: 10:00 .am@< WATER TYPE: RAW rcar.t -.c-t -',.a [Xl or C}ILORINATED t I ffiUnCB$l: U)CA1I7ION(S): 'Addlt;ls or OTHER TREATMENT t I g|AMP,,EFOIIU'IIIF East well near Rapids Well tlo. 1 Road 335 WetI tread (raw r,mter) T'E'AICTGFilI DO SAMPT-ES ttlEED TO BE COMPOSITEII BY TABORATORY ? YES lxl or NO I I Fotlrtoratory Asc Onty Below Tlrfut Lttu LABORATORY SAMPIE t 961727'1 CLIENT NAME or lD# Aqua-llbc Svstems' Inc. I-ABORATORYNAME Barrinqer laboratories, rnc. 1ABPHONE # I 3O3l 277-1687 DATE RECEIvED lN tABORATOay 04 t 17 t 96 DATEANALrZED O4 t 22 t 96 0s 08 96 COMMENTS PARAMETER ANTIMONY ARSENIC BARIUM BEBY1UUM CADMIUM C}IROMIUM COPPER CYANIDE FLUORIDE LEAD MERCURY NIO(EL SELENIUM SODIUM SULFATE THALUUM (metll RESiULT U U 0.07 U UT U .II U 0.013 11q 104 U (mcrll uct o.006 o.o5 2.O o.(x)4 0.oo5 0.1 1.3. EPA ; i[E[HQg 204.2w 200.7ffi 200.7ffiffi-ffi @ 239.2 245 -1 ^n0 -? ?70 -2 ?oo -7 300 -0 21q -? o.2 4.0 (mcrll t bMDt 0.003 E06'3T:62- 0.002 0.002 0.01T:6T- T:OT_T:i- 0.002 0 -0002 0 -04 o -005 1 1 0 -001 ' = NOTmllCt-'Actlont !ral' " r NOT en llCL 'trtonlortrg ncq*urgc Odyr H - llol&rc tonr hr bccn crcrcdcd 0.015' 0.0o2 0.1 9.ou 500.0" 0.0o2 l{T - ]{ot Torrd fcComeornd mClL - l/tgtrnr D(ttt r llGL - lfudnrn L* tt r zzt 2L- & Approved Date irA[- REsrrLTs for oobrdo Doprrhrat ol prarc Hc.|or end Em*ornrcrr. woctN)w€2. (Do ch.cy Gc.k Drltn sondr. D..latt @ m222'r6c' R.r,L.d 7r9tl -.}IWru.ArBFORr/Ei\OIOROAN-FRM Tide Golorado Dopartrnent of Prbtic Hoalth and &rvironment - DdnHng Water Section REPORTING FORM FoR oRlclNAL.PHAsE tr,,v tNoRGANtc euelvses SAMPI-ER: PTEASE FII.I OUT ONE FORM - FOR EACH INDIVTDUAL SOURCE/PIANT OT COMPOSITE SET YEs txl or l{o t I THESE RESULTS ARE To 8E usED To Futfttt srATE sAMpuNG neourSsrtamrrs .... frSIR ACII(ONSTDEFIN/|.rIONS ON BACK OF NOR,M W P\IVSID #:COUNTY: Garfield DATECOTTFCTEDz 04 t16 t 96 SYSTEIii,ESTABI.JSH M B,IT l- a-- ! , t Yry ADD8ESS: (naiU -2_l_02. w. Arapuho" pr. Lilrreron ts 80120(ehysical address) yl3ffi&f;/ Road 335, New castYe, e 81G47 sr^rE CONTACT PERSON:___Peter_Eelaul nnqin"t PtIONE:| o7O I 945-2236 SAMPTE COIIECTED BY: Aqua-Tec Svsterns, rnc. TIME COLLECTED: r o : oo .arnfm< WATERTYPE: RAWn..ra-c---'..r[{ or C}ILORINATEDI t or OffiERTREATMENTI I so(nc&(g:IOC,ITION($: -Ailrcs West weII near sAJdPra Foffifsf: kpid= WdI No. 2 I courrt, n*d 335 , *r, n "U ,r.* ,*a"r, UTGIIE(CFil.r DO SAMPLES iIFED TO BE COMFOS|TED BY IABORATORY ? YES txl or NO t I Forlabrutory Asc Ontykhw Tlrfur Iirc TABORATORY SAMPTE ' 961727_2 CUB.IT NAME or lD# Aoua-Iec Svsterns- Inc- IABORATORY NAME Barinqer lirboratories, Inc.tABP|{ONE # t 303t 277-1687 DATE RECEIVED IN IAEORATOAV 04 I '17 I 95 COMMENTS I D DAIE ANALYZED 04 t 22 t 96 05 08 96 PARAMETER ANTIMONY ARSENIC BARIUM BEBYIUUM CADMIUM CTIROMIUM COPPER CYANIDE FLUORIDE LEAD MERCURY NICKEL SELENIUM SODIUM SULFATE THAIIIUM (menl RESULT U U 0.07 U U U U U 0.9 U U U-6',:6'iI" -T3A- 117-T- kngrll uct o.oo6 EPA METHOD 204.2 206.2 200.7 200.7 200.7 200.7 200.7' 335.4 340.2 239.2 245.1 200.7 270.2ffi -366:6- -27-;5 0.05 2.O 0.004 lmgril tlb MDL 0.003 0.003 0.02 - 0.002 0.002 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.1 0.002 0.0002 0.04-6:d6'- -]--T-mdT- ' = NOT rn ilcl- .A6iro twd. " - NOT ro tlG- 'Uoc*oang Roqr*orncm OntV' H = lloldlr[ to.rr h.. bccocrcaodcd o.oos o.t 1.3. o.2 4.0 0.015' 0.002 0.r 3'.ou 500.0.. o.oo2 NT = Not Tracd for Conrgornd ntIL = llifiCrnmr grt tltcr MCL = Moirnrn )l | 22+ 7L Reviewet & Approved by DateTitle IIAIL EESULTS TO: Colordo Dcprrtrrnt ol h$6c ltcrtth rnd €nrtorrnont WOCT}.[)W{2, 4:XD Chcny Occk Odvi Sourh. Oontrlr. CO m222-tS3OQ.irJ ?6f - Llwql ^cc^o.rcri!^-^..' h.. REPORTIN'A rOnr,A ron neol oLo ct cit- ANALYSES .iITR: PI.EASE FILL OUT ONE FORM . FOB EACH INDTVIDUAL SOURCE/PI.ANT OT COMPOSITE SET vEs t >it or No I ! THESE RESULTS ARE TO BE USED TO FULFllr STATE SAMPLING REOUIREMENTS ....INSTRU(;NONS1DEFINrJIONS ON BACKOF TT)RM "" ') #: I:{ew coUNTY: 9ar{ie}4 OATE COLLECTED: 04 | 16 | 96 :M/ESTABLISHMENT The ids on ttre Colorado Hcneowner's Ass@iation :M AODRE55; (nail) 2'102 W. Aratnhoe Dr- Littleton i9 80120 'sicar Address) casflE, co--81647^.- :- D rAC[ pERSOnf, ,"a"i-r.f.,i,'*gir i- pHON-E: t 970 t 945-2236 ,,rLE COLLECTED BY: Aqua-Tec Systems, Inc. TIME COI I FCTED: 10:00 am/m< qR TYPE RAW e..n-i.-a-,.-,-.r IXt or CHLORINATED t I or OTHER TREATMENT I I sor/RcE(sr..WCAflON(6): 'A&rcss SAMPLE POINT(SI: East well near raElrcf 6r'(Il DO SAMPI.ES NEED TO BE COMFOSITED BY IABORATORY ? VES t XI OT NO I I For Labtury lhc OntY Bo.bw IW LirE RATORY SAMPLE # 961727=1 CUENT NAME or lDf Agua:'Tec Svstern's ' Inc ' 3nTORy NAME Barringer laboratories, Inc. t.,11B PHONE I t 303t 277-1687 .RECEIVEDINIABoRATORY 04 , 17 ,95 DATEANALYZED 04 t 17 t 96 - 04/30/96 r/lEl.lTS: .METER SS ALPHA JS BETA ,L SOUDS, mg/L rUM 226 UM 228 IIUM ON ,STED AI."P[IA t'pCirll BESULT 8.7 5.3 0.1 a o oa a.a 15o.. lpCitll i&cL oaa 50 N/A EPA lpCirll METHOD Llb MOL 900.0 900.0 sM-705 MCL in thc procore ol bcing changcd by EPA. 1280'901 .1 Not T..t d lor conpourd \r rnrlyro ir fourd in thc orociacd blrtt o woll rr in thc rrnplc ' llot ADofcrbb . llS8grrnr po Utorr ?lcocgrio prr Utr , Mrrimm Contrrinrnt LrYrl -DL - bborrtory Mcdrod Dotcction [itit iCL tor Brdium 2:28 ad ZZ8 COMBINED ir 5 pCi/L liCN. in dr prooo!. of being rt by EPA 'oer Alphr rinrr Rrdon rqdr Adiurrcd AlPhe ll r >4-3-L ]wed &Title Date RESULTS TO: Cotondo Dcperunoor ol Hcddr. WOCDI.OW-B2. (lOO ChcrY Crcck Odvc Soutlrt Dcnvrr, CO 8O222't53O d 6114 - J:\WP\IIBFORIYiS\RAD.FRM REPORTING FORM FOR RADIOLOGICAL ANALYSES SAMPLER: PLEASE Fltr oUT oNE FORM - FoR EACH INDIVIDUAL SoURcE/ptANT or CoMpoSlrE SET YEs tx or No t I THESE RESULTS ARE To BE usED To FuLFttr srATE sAMpLtNG REoutREMENTs .!!. ,/VS2TRACTIONSIDEFINI,JONS ON BACK OF IiIQRM ".. PWSID #: New COUNTy: Garfield DATE COLLECTED: 04 I IS I 96 SYSTEM/ESTABLISHMENT NAME: The on the Colorado Hcrnecnrner's Association SYSTEM ADDRESS: '(rnai1) Z1O2 W. Arapahoe Dr.Littleton @ 80120 ^-!l1ry{.gl Address)'3:ts-ttsrlity Road 3a5, Nerv casfle, o 8,64? srA'E CONTACT PERSONT p"t"r e"h",-n"gi"... - nfOnfeir iiO i -giS_ZZre SAMpLE COt I FCTED gy; Agua-Tec Systerns, Inc. nME COL1ECTEp, t0:00 am/,6q< WATER TYPE RAW mar.,i.-a-r,.a,-r IXI or CHLORINATED I I or OTHER TREATMENT I t SOURCE(S):WCAflON(S): -Addrcss SAMPLE POINT(S): West well near Rapids t{eII No. 2 t iltrrEaof Rt DO SAMPLES NEED TO BE COMPOSITED BY TABORATORY Z YES lxl or NO t I For Labranry llse Onty kbw This Lia. IABORATORY SAMPLE # q61727_2 CLIENT NAME or lD# Aoua-Tec Svstenrs. Tnr_.- IABORATORY NAME t.qB pHoNE 5 t 303 t 277-1687 OATE RECEIVED tN I.ABOBATORY 04 I 17 I 96 DATE ANALYZED 04 I 17 I 96 _ O4/30/96 COMMENTS: PARAMETER GROSS ALPHA GROSS BETA TOTAL SOLIDS. ms/L RADIUM 226 RADIUM 228 URANIUM RADON AA'USTED ALPHA hcult RESULT 4.8 3.0 0.1 1940 lpCi/ll ITJLCT o o aa ao 15... EPA METHOD sl,t-705 901 .1 lpCi/ll Llb MDL 900.0--d66lo aaa 50 N/A ItfT - Not Tertcd for conponnd 3 - Tho rnrlyo ir found in ttp orocirt.d bl.nk o wcfi rr in thc rnrplcN/A - Not App[crOto m!/L - lv0tgrrnrr por Uttr ipCl/L .- Plcocuricr pcr Utrr . llCL - iirdnan Contrrimot L.!rd [.b MDL - trborrrory Mcrhod Dcrcction Lirrjr' r MCL for Radium 26 * 228 coMBr'lED is 5 pCi/L MCL in thc proccr. ot bcing chengcd by EpA." - IJCL io ttr groccr ol-bgro ror bv EpA 'rr-r!!v- -r -' '. rqurh Adiurtcd Alphr Reviewed & Approved by l( r 947f-- DateTitle MAIL REsuLTs To: colordo ocpcrtnrnt ol Hccttr, wocDow-B2. rliloo chcrry crock Drivc South. Dcnrrcr, co 80222-153oBcvircd E/9tl . J:\WhiJBFORII6\RAD.FRM ----- --!!r' Colorado Department of Health - Drinking Water Section REPORTING FORM FOR PHASE l.ll.V oRGANIC ANALYSES SAMPLER: PLEASE FILL OUT ONE FORM - FOR EACH INDIVIDUAL SOURCE/PLANT or COMPOSITE SET YES I X or NO t I THESE RESULTS ARE TO BE USED TO FULFILI STATE SAMPLING REOUIREMENTS .'3. MlTtACnONSlDEnNmONS ON BACK OF FONVI .,t', PWSTD #:-W- COUNW: Garf-i-eld _ DATE COLLECTED: 04 I 15 I q6 SySTEM/E5TABLISHMENT pap1E. The Rapids on the colorado Horneorr'rnerrs Association SYSTEM (rnail) 2102 w. Aratrnhoe Dr. Littleton c0 801 20 Srd&rr?Olq D(ehysical eddress) 3335 Cowrty Road, 335, New Castle, O 81647 CONTACT PERSON: Peter Belau, Engineer SAMpLECOg-ECTED gy; Aqua-leg Systerns, Inc. WATER TYPE: RAW n".rnr.-no-'"...",..t [E or CHLORINATED t I SOU[CE(S).' H)CATION(S): - Addnss Rapids WelI .No. 1 PHONE:1 9L0 t 945-2236 T;ME COLLESIEp; 10:00 am/Eo( or OTHER TREATMENT I I s MPLE POrNr($: East well near t Cor,rnty Road 335 | WeIl head lEaq tratel)- Lrara(otFml DO SAMPI-ES NEED TO BE COMPOS|TED BY LABORATORY ? YES I xl or NO t I lf yes, record information for second source or second PWSIDf, $orrRCE(s):.U)CAITON(S): -Addrcs West wel} near Rapids WeIl No. Z I CoLtnty Road 335 SATIPLB POINT(S): 03Earfi,of ronm For Laboroory Use Only BelN Thb Liru LABORATORy SAMpLE #: 961727-4 CLIENT NAME q lpf: Agua-Tec Systen"s LABORATORy NAME: Barringer hbratories, Irc.LAB pHONE g; 1 303 1277-1587 DATE RECE;yED tN LABORATSTyi 04 t 17 t 96 DATEANALYZED: 04 t 13 I 96 PAGE 2 LABORATORY NUMBER_ PWSTD# ALL RESULTS SHOULD BE REPORTED IN ugfl UNREGUIATED VOCs (TRIHALOMETHANES): These THM results do NOT count as the regulated THM resutts for systems serving greater than IO,OOO population. (ugfll tab MDL 0.5 0.5-0:5- 0 .5- CONTAMINANT Chtoroform Bromodichloromethane Chlorodibromomethane Bromoform cAs# 67-66-3 75-27-4 12448-1 75-25-2 (ugfll RESULT cU U U U EPA METHOD 524.2 524.2 524.2 524.2 (ugfll' BLANK RESUTT 0.s 0-5 0-s 0-5 REGUTATED ORGANIC CHEMICALS--VOCs CONTAMNAilT l,l -Dichloroethylene | , I ,1 -Trichloroedrane l, 1,2-Trichloroethane 1,2,-Dichloro€thane 1,2,-Dichloropropane' 1, 2,4-Trichlorobenzene Benaene Carbon tetrachloride cis- 1,2-Dichloroetrylene Dichloromethane Ethylbenzene Monochtorobenzene o-Dichlorobenzene' *' para-Dichtorobenzene Styrene Tetrachloroefiylene Toluene trans- l, 2-Dichloroethylene Trichloroethylene Vinyl chloride Xylenes (totall cAs# 75-35-4 71-55-6 79-O0-5 107-06-2 78-87-5 120-82-1 71-43-2 56-23-5 156-59-2 75-O9-2 10041-4 108-90-7 95-50-l 106-46-7 100-42-5 127-18-4 108-88-3 156-60-5 79-Or-6 75-01-4 133C-2G7 lug/ll RESULT U U U U U -u-- 5.48 U _JJ- U U U U U U U lug/ll MCt 7 200 EPA METHOD 524.2 s24.2w 524.2 524 -2 524.2 \14 -) 524.2 524.2 524.2 524.2 524.2 524.2 524.2@ 524.2 75 100 5 1,000 1(x) 5 2 10,000 (ugfll BI.ANK RESULT 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5.F 0.sJt 5_ n-q 0.5 0-q 0-5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.s 1.0 0.5 (ug/ll Lab MDL 0.5 0.5-r 0-5 0-5 0.5 -6 r--T:r-T'r 0.5 0.s 0-5 0.5 0.5 0.5 - 0.5-6=_ 0.5 0.5-T.0-r 5 5 5 70 5 5 70 5 700 100 600 524.2 524.2ww REGULATED ORGANIC CHEMICALS--SOCs COI{TAMINANT Dioxin 2,4,'O 2,4,5,-TP Alachlor Atrazine Benzo(alpyrene Carbofuran Chlordane Dalapon Dibromochloropropane Dinoseb Diquat lugfll (ugrll RESULT MCL. 0.00003 U U U q U U U U U U U lugfll(ugrU BIANK Lrb MDL RESULTGAS# r746-01-6 94-75-7 93-72-l 15972-60-8 1912-24-9 50-32-8 1563-66-2 57-74-9 75-99-O 96-12-8 85-85-7 85-OO-7 70 50 2 3 0.2 40 2 200-. o.2,7 20 EPA METHOD 515. 1 515. 1 505 505 525.1 531.1 50s 515.1 524.2 515.'l 549.1 0 .38 0.12 0.60 2.5 0.1 1.5 2.4 1.0 1.0 0 .30 5.0 0.38 . o ^1? 0 -60 2-5 0r1 1.5 2.0 1.0 1.0 0 .30 5.0 LABORATORY NUMBER PWSID# UNREGULATED ORGANIC CHEMICALS-.VOCS (CONT.} CONTAMINANT 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 1 ,3-Dichloropropane 1,3-Dichloropropene 1, 3, S-Trimethylbenzene 2,2-Dichloropropane Bromobenzene Bromochloromethane Bromometrane Chloroethane Chloromethane Dibromomethane Dichlorodifl uoromethane Fluorotrichloromethane Hexachlorobutadiene lsopropylbenzene m-Dichlorobenzene Naphthalene n-Butylbenzene n-Propylbenzene o-Chlorotoluene pChlorotoluene f lsopropyholuene Sec-butylbenz€ne Tentutylbenzene cAs# 9s-63-6 142-28-9 542-75-6 108-67-8 59G2G7 r08-8&11 74-97-5 74-96-4 75-00-3 74-87-3 74-95-3 75-7r-8 75-69-4 87-66-3 98-82-2 541-73-r 91-20-3 104-51-8 103-65-1 95-49-8 106-€-4 25155-15-1 135-9&8 98{6-0 (ugrU RESULT U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U EPA METHOD 124.2 524.2 524.2 524.2 \24 -2 q24 -2 s24.2 524.2 524.2 524.2 524.2 524.2 s24.2 524.2 524.2 524.2 524.2@Tt s24.2 524.2 524.2 524.2 524.2 (ugfll BLANK RESULT 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.56F--6F--0F 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.5 1.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5-l:r E--T:5-- o-- 0.5 0.5 (usfll Lab MDL 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1.0 1.0 0.5 1.0 0.5 0.5 -6.s 0.5t:5---6:t--r 0.5 0.L 0.5 0.5 0.5 Codes uscd: NT = Not tested for compound $ = The analwe is found in the associated btank as well as in the sample BDL - lndicates that dre compound was analyzed for, but was bclow $c lab MDL. Lab MDL = Laboratory Method Detestion Limit J = lndicates the presence of a compound that meets the identification c.iteda but the result is less than the sample quanitation limh and great€r than the Lab MDL. (Above the Lab MDL bui below the PQL.I n t*zi at Date MAIL RESULTS TO: Colorodo Dcportncnt of Hcdth, WOCI}DW-B} 43OO Chcrry Crcck Drivc South, Dcnvcr. CO 80222-153O Rcvi*d 7/94 - J:\WP1IABIi\OBGANIC.FRM SARRI NG E R L AB ORAT ORI E S,/NC 15000 w.6rH AVE., SUTTE 300 coLDEN, CO 80401 lmq zn-1687 FAX (303) zn-1@9 AguaTec Systems, Inc.P.O. Box 488 Glenwood Springs, CO 9L602 Attn: Ralph CourterProject: Enartech 6 -May- 95 Received: L"7 -Apr-96 10:00 PO A}IALYTICAL REPORT PACKAGE A}IAI,YTICAIJ RESI'LTS . . R- ]- QUATITY COIITROr, REPORT ...Q-]- Meeting The Analytical Challenges Of A ChangingWorld Since 196I 8ARRTATGER L ABORAT ORr E S, /NC r5fi)0 w. 5T H AVE., SUTTE 300 GOLDEN, CO 80401 (303) 277-16r/ FAX (303) 2n-16€,9 AquaTec Systems, Inc. P.O. Box 488 Glenwood Springs, CO 81502 5 -May- 95 Page: i Attn: Ralph Court,erProject: Enartech Received z L'7 -APr-95 l-0:00 PO #: CASE NARRATIVE A total of 4 Water samples were received, on L7-Apr-95. As stated in the chain of custody, Lhe samples were run for the following analyses: Sb, As, B€r, B€, Cd, Ct, Cu, Pb, H9, Ni, S€, Nd, Tl , CN, F, SO4, NO3+NO2, Gross Alpha, Gross Beta, Fta-226, Ftn'222, Volatile Organic Compounds, Trihalomethanes, EDB & DBCP, Pesticides, Herbicides, Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds, Carbamate Pest.icides, Endot.hall and Diquat. A table, to Cross reference your sample ID_to ours, is atfached. Our procedures are summarized on Ehe Quality Control Data Sheet. euality control sEandards for organic and inorganic analyses followed ifr" .piropriate SW-846 or EPA meLhodology. Quality control standards tor rldiolhemistry followed our standard operating procedures or contractual requirements . ft(r"*r*/rSigned:,l#katu Manager sisned , .(:. {, Manager Project tc MeetingThe Analytical Challenges Of A ChangingWorld Since 1961 I}/RRINGER L A B O R AT O R I E S,/NC 15000 w. 6rH AVE., SUTTE 3oo GoLDEN, CO 80401 (gq 2n-16C7 FAX (303) 2n-16f,9 AguaTec Systems, P.O. Box 488 Glenwood Springs, Attn: Ralph CourLerProject: Enartech Inc. co 81502 Page: 5 -May- 95ii Received: 1-7-Apr-96 10:00 PO #: Lab- ID Matrix Client Sample ID Sampled 96L727 -t 96L727 -2 96L727 -3 96t727 -4 Water Water Water Water ENARTBCH, RAPIDS, WELL #1 ENARTECH, RAPIDS, WelI #+Trip Blank WELL #1 & #+ Composite L0 -Apr- 96 1-6 -Apr- 95 NA NA *f ",etfng The Analytical Challenges Of A Changing Wortd Since 196I RR/NGER L ABORATORI E S, /NC 6 -May- 9 5 Page: R-1 Job: 96]-7278 Status: Final 1s000 w. 6rH AVE., sUrTE 300 GOLDEN, CO 8(N01 (3$) 2n-1W7 FAX (s03) Zn-16A9 AquaTec Syst,ems, Inc. Sanple Id: ENARTECII, RAPIDS,WELL *1 Lab Id: 96L727 -L Proj ect: Enart,ectr Date Sampled: 10-Apr-96 Dlatrix: Watser Date Analvte Fraction Method Concentration MDL Analyzed Antimony Tota1 204.2 U mg/1 0.003 8-May-96 Arsenic Total 205.2 U mg/1 0.003 29'Apr-95 Barium Total Beryllium Total Cadmium Total Chromium Total Copper TotalLead Total Mercury Total Nicke1 TotalSelenium Tota1Sodium TotalThallium Tot.al Cyanide Total Fluoride SulfateNitrate+Nitrite Thallium Total Cyanide Total Fluoride SulfateNitrate+Nitrite 200.7 240.7 200.7 200.7 200.7 239.2 245.t 200.7 270.2 200.7 279.2 335 .4 340.2 300.0 3s3.2 u mg/I 0.0002 22-Apr-96 U mg/I 0.04 25-Apr-96 0.01-3 mg/l 0.005 25-APr-95 o. 07 mg/Lu mg/l U mg/l U mg/I U mg/l U mg/I 119 mg/I U mglI U mglIt.2 mg/l 104 mg/I 0.8 mglI u mg/I U mg/I o. s mg/1 LL7 mg/l L.0 mg/I O.O2 24-Apr-960.002 6-May-96 0.002 6-May-95 0.01 24-APr-96 0.01- 24-Apr-96 0.002 25-Apr-96 l- 24-Apr-960.001 7-MaY-96 0.01 24-APr-960.1 24-APr-96L 29-Apr'960.L 26-APr-96 Date 0.00L 7-MaY-95 0.0L 24-APr-96 0. L 24-APt-96L 29-APr-96 0. L 26-APr-96 SampJ.e Id: ENARTECH,RAPIDS,$Ie1L #4 Lab Id: 96L?27-2 Project: Enart,ech Date Sampled: 16-Apr-96 Matsrix: Watser Analvte Fraction Met,hod Concent.ration MDL Analvzed 204.2 Umgfl 0-003 8-May-96 Arsenic Tot,al 206 .2 U mg/l- 0.003 29-}tpt-95 Barium Tota1 200.7 O.O7 mg/I 0.02 24-Apt-96 Beryllium Total 200.7 U mgl] 0.002 6-May-96 Cadirium Total 2AO .7 U mg/I 0 . 002 6 -May- 96 Chromium Total 2OO.7 U mg/1 0.01 24'Apr-96 copper Tor,al 2OO .7 U mgll 0.0L 24-Apt-96 leld Total 239.2 U mg/1 0.002 25-Apr-96 Mercury Tota] 245.L U mgll 0.0002 22-Apr-96 Nickel Total 200.7 U mg/1 0.04 25-Apr-96 Selenium Total 270.2 O.O1O mg/I 0-005 25-Apr-96 sodium Total 200.7 134 mg/l 1 24-Apt'95 279.2 335 .4 340.2 300.0 3s3 .2 MeetingThe Analytical Challenges Of A ChangingWorld Since 196I /I'IGER LAB ORATORI E S,/NC I5OOO W. 6TH AVE., SUITE 3OO GOLDEN, CO 80401 (3Og) 2n-1657 FAX (303) Zr.-1ff,s AquaTec Systems, Inc. Analyte: Gross AlphaFraction: TotalMethod: 900.0 Units z pCj-/L 6 -May- 95Page: R-2Job: 961,727E Status: Final Project: Enartech Date Analyzed z O4/22-O4/ZStLD: 13 Date 95L'727 -l 10-Apr-96 96L727 -2 1,6 -Apr- 9G Analyte: Gross BetaFraetion: Total Method: 900.0Units: pCi/I ENARTECH, RAPIDS, WELL #]- ENARTECH, RAPIDS, Well #+ Water Water 8.7+5. l- 4 .8+4 .4 13 13 ProjeeE: Enartech Date Analyzed z 04/22-O4/ZSLLD: I Date 95L727-l 10-Apr-95 96L727 -2 t-G -Apr- 96 Arralyte: Ra-226Fraction: Total Method: SM-705Unite: pCir/I ENARTECH, RAPTDS, WELL #1 ENARTECH, RAPIDS, WelI #+ Water Water 5.3t5 . 5 3 .0+5 .3 I I Project: Enartectr Date Analyzed z 04/26 -04/30I-rLD: 0 .3 Matri Water 0. l-+O . 2 0.396L727-L L0-Apr-96 Analyte z .Rn-222 Fraction: Total Method: 901.1Units: pCir/I ENARTECH, RAPIDS, WELL #1 Project: Enartech Date Analyzed: 17-Apr-96LLD:150 96L727 -2 1-6-Apr-95 Wat.er ENARTECH, RAPIDS, WeII #e DaEe Date MeetingThe Analytical challenges of A changingworld since 196I 15000 w. Sanple Id: Trip Blank Lab Id: 96L727'3 Date Sarrpled: 10-Apr-95 Datse Extracted: NA Date Analyzed: 18-Apr-96 ChloromethaneVinyl Chloride Bromomethane Chloroethane Tr i chl orof luoromethane L, 1-Dichloroethene MeEhylene Chloride trans - 1 , 2 -Dichloroethene L, 1-Dichloroethane 2,2-Dic,hloropropane cis- l-, 2 -Dichloroethene.Chloroform Bromochloromethane L, L, 1 -Trichloroethane 1, L-DichloroproPene Carbon Tetrachloride 1, 2 -Dichloroethane Benzene Trichloroethene 1, 2 -DichloroproPane ' Bromodichloromethane Dibromomethane trans - 1, 3 -DichloroProPene Toluene cis - 1 , 3 -DichloroProPene L, L, 2-Trichloroethane 1 , 3 -DichloroproPane Tetrachloroethene Dibromochloromethane L, 2 -Dibromoethane'Chlorobenzene 1, L, 1, 2 -AeErachloroethane EthylbenzerLe m, p-Xylene ortho-Xylene Styrene Isopropylbenzene Bromoform !, !, 2, 2 -TeErachloroethane L ,2 ,3 -TrichloroProPane u 0.5u 0.5u 0.5u 0.5u 0.5u 0.5u 0.5u 0.5u 0.5u 0.5u 0.5u 0.5u 0.5u 0.5u 0.5u 0.5u 0.5u 0.5u 0.5u 0.su 0.5u 0.5u 0.5u 0.5u 0.5u 0.5u 0.5u 0.5u 0.5u 0.5u 0.5 5.58 U U 0.5 0.5 BARRINGE R L AB ORAT ORI E S, /NC 6rH AVE., SUITE 300 GOLDEN, CO 80401 (303) 277-16& FAX (303) 27l-1689 AquaTec Systems, Inc. Volatsile Organic Compounds Project: EnartechDilution Factor: 1:1 Matrix: WaEer Method z 524.2 Concentration Analyte CAS Number Pql1 MDL 75"7L-8 u l-.0 74-87 -3't5-oL-4 74-83-9 75-00-3 75-69-4 75-35-4 75-09-2 r_56 -50 - 5 75-34-3 s90 -20 - 7 155 - 59 -4 67 -66-3 74-97 -5 7l_-55-6 553-58-6 56-23-5 L07 -06-2 7L-43-2 79-0t-6 78-87 -5 75-27 -4 74-95-3 r-006r- -02-6 r-08-88-3 1006r- - 0r-- 5 79-00-s 142-28-9 L27 - 18 -4 L24-48-L 105- 93-4' l_08-90-7 630-20-6 t-00-4L-4 M+P 95-47 -5 100 -42 - 5 98-82-8 75-25-2 79-34-5 96-1-8-4 5 -May- 95 Page: R-3 Job: 951-7278 Status: Final u L.0u L.0u L.0u L.0u 0.5u 0.5 0.5 MeetingThe Annlytical Challenges Of A ChangingWorld Since 196l PARRI NG E R L AB ORAT ORI E S,/NC 15000 w.6rH AVE., SUTTE 300 coLoEN, CO 80401 (fi3) 277-1€a7 FAX (3O3) Zn-$as AquaTee Systems, Inc. Volatile Organic Compounds Sample Id: Trip B1ankLab Id: 96L727-3 Date Sampled: 10-Apr-9G Date Extracted: NADate Analyzed: 18-Apr-95 5 -May- 95 Page: R-4Job: 95L7278 Status: Fi-nal Project: EnartechDilution Factor: 1:1Itlatrix: Water Method: 524.2 Concent,ration n-Propylbenzene Bromobenzene L, 3, 5-Trimethylbenzene 2-Chlorotoluene 4 -Chlorotoluenetert -Butylbenzene L ,2 , 4-Trimethyl-benzene sec-Butylbenzene p- Isopropyltoluene 1, 3.Dichlorobenzene l-, 4 -Dichlorobenzene n-Butylbenzene l-, 2-Dichlorobenzene 1, 2 -Dibromo-3 -Chloropropane L ,2 , 4-Trichlorobenzene Hexachlorobutadiene Naphthalene L, 2, 3 -Trichlorobenzene L03 -65 - 1 108-86-1 108 -67 - 8 95-49-8 l_06-43 -4 98-05-5 95-63-5 r-35-98-8 99-87 -6 54L-73-L LO6-46-7 r-04-5r_-8 95-50. 1 96-L2-8 L20-82-L 87-68 -3 9L-20-3 87 -6]--6 U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 r-.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 p-Bromofluorobenzene i, z -oichLorobenzene -d4*75-L25% 75-L25% MeetingThe Analytical challenges of A changingworld since I96t AIU?I NGE R L AB OR AT ORI E S, /NC 15000 w. 5rH AVE., SUITE 300 GOLDEN, CO 80401 (3$l n74687 FAx (303) 277-1ffi9 5 -MaY- 96 Page: R-5 Job: 96L727E, SLatus: Final AquaTec Syst,ens, Inc. Volat,ile Organie Courpounds Projects: Enarteeh DiluEion Factor: 1:1 MaErix: WaEer Method: 524.2 Concentration Analyte CAS Number tlq/I MDL 75-7L-8 - u 1.0 Samp1e Id: !{ELL #1 & #4 Composite Lab Id: 96L727-4 Date Sampled: 10-Apr-95 Date Extracted: NA Date Analyzed: 18-Apr-95 Chloromethane 74-87-3 Vinyl Chloride 75-07--4 Bromomethane 74-83-9 Chloroethane 75-00-3 Trichlorofluoromethane 75-69-4 1, l--Dichloroethene 75-35-4 Methylene Chloride 75-09-2 trans -:-.,2-Dichloroethene l-55-50-5 L,1-DichloroeEhane 75-34-3 2,2-Dichloropropane 590-2O-7 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene L56-59-4 Chloroform 67'66-3 Bromochloromethane 74-97-5 1, L,l-Trichloroethane 71-55-6 1,1-Dichloropropene 553-58-6 Carbon Tetrachloride 56-23-5 1,2-Dichloroethane LO1-06-2 Benzene 7L-43-2 Trichloroethene 79-0L-6 L,2-Dichloropropane 78-87-5 Bromodichloromethane 75-27-4 Dibromomet,hane 74-95-3 trans-1, 3 -Dichloropropene 10061- 02-5 Toluene L08-88-3 cis- 1, 3 -Dichloropropene l-0051-- 0L - 5 L,L,2-Trichloroethane 79-00-5 1-,3-DichloroproPane L42'28-9 Tetrachloroethene L27-L8-4 Dibromochloromethane L24-48-l 1,2-Dibromoethane Lo6-93-4 Chlorobenzene 108-90-7 l-,1,1-,2-Tetrachloroethane 530-20-5 Ethylbenzene l-00-41--4 m,p-Xylene M+P ortho-Xylene 95-47-6 St.yrene 100 -42'5 Isopropylbenzene 98-82-8 Bromoform 75'25-2 L , ! , 2, 2 -Tetrachloroethane 7 9 -34 -5 !,2,3-Trichloropropane 96-L8-4 5 .48 u l-.0u 1.0u L.0u 1.0u 0.5u 0.5 0.5u 0.5u 0.su 0.5u 0.5u 0.5u 0.5u 0.5u o.5u 0.5u 0.5u 0.5u 0.5u 0.5u 0.5u 0.5u 0.5u 0.5u 0.5u 0.5u 0.5u 0.5u 0.5u 0.5u 0.5u 0.5u 0.5u 0.5u 0.5u 0.5u 0.5u 0.5u 0.5u 0.5 MeetingThe Analytical Challenges Of A ChangingWorld Since 1961 E4RR/NGER L A B ORATO Rr E S,/NC 15000 w. 6rH AVE., SUrrE 3oo coLDEN, CO 80401 (goq 2n-1N7 FAX (303) zn-168s AquaTec SysEems, Inc. Volatile Organic Compounds 5 -May- 95Page: R-5.fob: 96]-727F, Status: Final Sauple Id: VIEIJL #1 e #4 ComposiEeLab Idz 96L727-4Date Sampled: 10-Apr-9G Dat,e Extsract,ed: NADate Analyzed: 18-Apr-9G Project: EnartechDilut,ion Factor: 1:1Matrix: Water Method: 524.2 Concentration n-Propylbenzene Bromobenzene L, 3, 5 -Trimet.hylbenzene 2 -Chlorotoluene 4 -Chlorotoluenetert -Butylbenzene L ,2 , 4-Trimethylbenzene sec-Butylbenzene p- Isopropyltoluene 1, 3 -Dichlorobenzene 1, 4 -Dichlorobenzene n-Butylbenzene 1, 2 -Dichlorobenzene 1-, 2 -Dibromo-3 -Chloropropane 1, 2, 4-Trichlorobenzene - Hexachlorobutadi.ene Naphthalene L, 2, 3 -Trichlorobenzene 103 -65 -1 108-85-l- r_08 -67- 8 95-49-8 L05-43 -4 98-06-5 9s-63-6 135 -98 - I 99-87 -6 54r--73 - L to6-46-7 r_04 -5L - 8 95 -50 - t_ 96 -1,2-B 120-82-L 87-68-3 9L-20-3 87 -51_- 5 U U U U U U U u U U U U U U U U U U 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 75-L252 75-L25* p-Bromofluorobenzene 1-, 2 -Dichlorobenzene -d4 Meeting The Analytical chauenges of A cttangingworrd since I96t BIRR/NGER L A B OR AT O RI E S, /NC 15000 w. 5rH AVE., SU|TE 300 GOLDEN, CO 8M01 (fiq 2n4ffi7 FAX (303) 277-1@9 AquaTec Systems, Inc. Trihalonethanes Saurple Id: V{EIJL #1 e #4 ComposLte Lab Id: 96L727-4 Date Sanpled: 10-APr-95 Date Bxt,racted: NA Datse Analyzed: 17-APr-95 6 -MaY- 96 Page: R-7 Job: 951727E, Status: Final Projects: EnartechDilution Factor: 1:1 Matrix: Water Method:524.2Concentration Chloroform Bromodichloromethane Dibromochloromethane Bromoform TTHM 67 -56-3 7s-27 -4 a24-48-t 75-25-2 U U U u U 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1.0 p-Bromofluorobenzene L, 2 -Dichlorobenzene -d4 75-L25* 75-125* MeetingThe Analytical Challenges Of A ChangingWorld Since 1961 8/RR/NGER L A B OR AT O Rr E S,INC 15000 w. 6rH AVE.. SUrrE 3oo coLDEN, CO 80401 (3r,gr 2n-1N7 FAX (303) 277-1(j{J9 AquaTee Systems, Inc. EDB & DBCP 6 -May- 95Page: R-8Job: 961727F- Status: Final Saurple Id: VfEtL #1 & #4 CompositeLab Id: 96L727-4Date Sampled: 10-Apr-9GDate Extracted: 17-Apr-9GDate Analyzed: 18-Apr-9G Project: EnarteehDiLution Factor: 1:LMatrix: Water Method: 504 Concentration 1-, 2 -Dibromoethane 1, , 2 -Dlbromo - 3 - Chloropropane!, 2, 3-Trichloropropane 105-93-4 95-]-2-8 95-18-4 U U U 0 .025 0 .025 0 .050 59-L372Bromofluorobenzene MeetingThe Analytical challenges of A changingworld since 196I 8/RR/NGER L AB OR AT O Rr E S, /NC 15m0 w. 6rH AVE., SUTTE 300 GOLDEN, CO 8(N01 (303) 277-1687 FAx (303) Zf7-1689 AquaTec Syst,ems, Inc. Pestieides #4 Composite 5 -l,rlay-96 Page: R-9 Job: 96r.727E Status: Final Sample Id: IIELL, #1 & Lab Id: 96L727-4 Date Sanpled: 10-Apr-95 Date Extracted: 17-Apr-96 Date Arralyzed: 18-Apr-96 Project: Enartech Diluti,on Factor: 1:1 Matrix: Water llettrod: 505 Concentration AlachlorAldrin Atrazine Chlordane alpha-Chlordane gamma-Chlordane Dieldrin Endrin Heptachlor Heptachlor Epoxide Hexachlorobenzene Hexachlorocyc lopentadiene Lindane Methoxychlor cis-Nonachlor Erans-Nonachlor Simazine ToxapheneAroclor 10L6Aroclor L22LAroclor ]-232Aroclor L242Aroclor L248Aroclor L254Aroclor L26O 5972-50-8 309-00-2 l-91,2-24-9 57 -74-9 5l-03 -7]--9 51 03 -74-2 50-57-1 72-20-8 75-44-8 LO24- 57 - 3 t-t_8 -74 - l_ 77 -47 -4 58-89-9 72-43-5 5103 -73-L 39755-80-5 L22-34-9 8001-3 5 -2 1-2674-LL-2 1,L104 -28-2 1_1r-4L-16-5 53469-2L-9 12672-29 -6 L1097 -69-L 11096 -42-5 U U u U U U u U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U 0 .60 0 .075 2.5 2.O 0 .085 0 .065 0 .055 0 .070 0. L5 0 .055 o .027 0. r"9 o .040 o.25 0 .055 0 .092 4.0 3.0 0.50 0 .50 0.50 0 .50 0 .50 0.50 0.50 1L8? T158% 64-].4l? 59 -.131-? MeetingThe Arulytical Challenges Of A ChangingWorld Since 1961 IIIRR/ITGER L A B O RATORT E S,/NC 15000 w. 6rH AVE., SUTTE 3oo GOLDEN, CO 8(X01 (3Og) 277-1687 FAX (303) Zn_168s AquaTec Systsems, Inc. Herbicides Sanple Id: VUELL #1 & #4 CompositeLab Id: 96L727-4 Date Sanpled: 10-Apr-95 Dat,e Extracted: 19-Apr-96Date Analyzed: 25-Apr-96 5-May- 9GPage: R-10Job: 961,7278Status: Final Project: EnartechDilution Factor: 1:1Matrix: Water Uethod: 515.1 Concentration Dalapon 3, 5-Dichlorobenzoic Acid 4 -Nitrophenol Dicamba Dichlorprop 2 ,4-D Pentachlorophenol 2,4,s-TP (Silvex) Chloramben 2 ,4,5-T 2 ,4-DBDinoseb Bentazon Picloram DCPAAcifluorfen 94-74-5 5r_-35-5 100 - 02-7 191_8-00-9 L20-36-5 94-'75-7 87-85-5 93-72-L r-33 - 90 -4 93-75-5 94-82-6 88-85-7 25057 -89-0 1_9L8 -02-L L897 -45-6 50594 -66-6 U U U U U u U u U U u U U U U U 1.0 0 .125 0. r-5 0.16 0 .43 0.38 0 .10 o.L2 0.L0 0.12 0 .50 0.30 o.26 0 .1_0 0 .20 0.18 72-L372Tr-88t Meeting The Analytical challenges of A changingworld since 196I trRRINGER L ABOR AT ORI E S, /NC 150m w. 6rH AVE., SU|TE 300 GOLDEN, CO 80401 (303) Z7-16Cl FAX (3o3) 277-168p AquaTec SysEems, Inc. 6-MaY-96 Page: R-11 Job: 961-7278 Statrus: Final Sarrple Id: !.Lf, *1 Lab Id: 96L727-4 Semi -Volat,ile Organic Courpounds & #4 Compositse FrojecE: Enartech DilutLon Factor: 1:1 Matrix: Water Method: 525.L Concentration Analvte CAS Number Pq 'l lgDL 77-47-4 u 0.1 Dimethylphthalale l-31-L1-3 u 0.3 acenaphthylene 208-96-8 u 0'l- 2-Chlorobiphenyl 2051-60-7 U 0'1 Diethylphthalate 84-66-2 U 0'6 rluorene 85-73-7 u o'L Date Sanpled: 19-Apr-96 Date Extsracted: 22-Apr-95 Date Analyzed: 3-May-95 PropachlorTrifluralin 2 , 3 -Dichlorobiphenyl Hexachlorobenzene Simazine Atrazine Pentachlorophenol Lindane Phenanthrene Anthracene Metribuzin 2, 4, 5-Trichlorobiphenyl Alachlor Heptachlor Metolachlor gamma-Chlordane Butachlor alpha-Chlordane t,rans -Nonachlor Endrin Butylbenzylphthalate bis ( 2 -et,hy1hexy1 ) adiPate Benzo (a) anthracene u 0.2u 0.2u o.2u 0.2u o.2u 0.3u 3.0u 0.Lu o.2u o.l-u o.2u 0.1u 0.3u o.2u o.2 Di-n-butylphUhalate 84-74-2 2 ,2 ,4, 4 -Tbtrachlorobiphenyl 2437 -79 -8 1918- 16-7 L582-09-8 l-5605 -91-7 LLg-74-L L22-34-9 L9L2-24-9 87-86-5 58-89-9 85-0r--8 L20-L2-7 21-087 -64-9 !5862-O7 -4 5972-50-8 7 6-44-8 51218 -45-2 5103 -74-2 238L4-66-9 5r_03 -7L-9 39765-80-5 72-20-8 85-68 - 7 103 -23 -1 s6-55-3 u 0.1u 0.1u 0.3u 0.1u 0.3u o.2u 0.1-u .0.1u 0.Lu 0.1u l-.0u 0.5u 0.5u o.2u 0.3u 0.1u 0.3u 0.1 3 .78 3.08 1.0 AIdrin 309-00-2 Heptachlor Epoxide 1024-57-3 2,2,3,4, 6-Pent,achlorobiphenyl 50233 -25-2 Pyrene L29-00-0 2 ,2 ,4 ,4 ,5, 6 -Hexachlorobiphenyl 60145- 22-4 Chrysene 2'L8- 0L- 9 2,2,3 ,3 ,4,4, 5-Heptachlorobiphe 52653 -71-5 Methoxychlor 72-43-5 2,2,3,3, 4,5, 6, 6-OcEachlorobiph 40L85-7L-8 bis (2-EEhylhexyl) phthalat,e 1-]-7 - 8l--7 MeetingThe Analytical Challenges Of A ChangingWorld Since 1961 0.8 E4RR/NGER L A B ORAT ORr E S,/NC 15000 w. 5rH AVE., SUrrE 3oo coLDEN, CO 80401 (303) 277-16& FAX (303) 277-1ffig AquaTec Systems, Inc. Seni-Volatile Organic Comporrnds & #4 Composite 6 -May- 96Page: R-12Job: 96L7278 Status: Final- SanpJ.e Id: VIELt #1Lab Id: 96L727-4 " Date Sampled: 10-Apr-9G DaEe Extracted: 22-A9r-96 Dat,e Analyzed: 3-May-9G Project: EnartechDilut,ion Factor: 1:1Matrix: Water Method: 525.1 Concentration Benzo (b) fluoranthene Benzo (k) fluoranthene Benzo (a) pyrene Indeno (L,2 ,3 -cd) pyrene Dibenzo (a, h) anthracene Benzo (9, h, i) perylene 205-99-2 207-08-9 50-32-8 1-93 -3 9 -5 53-70-3 t9L-24-2 U U U U U U 0.3 0.3 0.L 0 .1- 0.1 0.1 Perylene -dt2 55-l.202 Meeting The Analytical challenges of A changing wortd since I96I B/RRINGER L AB O R AT O RI E S, /NC 1sooo w. 6IH AVE.. SUITE 3OO GOLDEN, CO 80401 (&3) 277-1657 FAx (303) zn'18s AquaTec Syst,ens, Inc. Carbamate Pestsicidee Saurple Id: WELL *1 & *4 ComPosit,e Lab Id: 96L127-4 Date Sarrpled: 10-APr-95 Date Extracted: NA Date Analyzed: 18-APr-95 6 -MaY- 96 Page: R-13 Job: 961-7278 St,atus: Final Project: Enartech Dilut,ion Factor: 1:1 Matrix: Water Method: 531.1 Concentration Aldicarb Sulfone Aldicarb Sulfoxide Oxamyl Methomyl 3 -HydroxycarbofuranAldicarb Propoxur (Baygon) Carbofuran Carbaryl Methiocarb L645-87 -4 L646-87 -3 23 135- 22-O 16752-77 -5 16555 -82-5 L15-06-3 LL4-26-L 1553 -66-2 63-25-2 2032-55-7 U U U U U U U U U U 2.O 2.0 2.O 0.5 2.O 1.0 L.0 1.5 2.O 4.0 MeetingThe Analytical Challenges Of A ChangingWorld Since 196l PARRI NGER LA BORATORI E S,/NC 15000 w. 6rH AVE., SUrrE 3oO GOLDEN, CO 80401 (s@r 2n-1687 FAX (303) 2n-168s AquaTec Syst,ems, Ine. EndothaII 5-May- 95Page: R-14 'Job: 961-7278 St.atus: Fina1 Sample Id: $IELL #1 e #4 CompositeLab Id: 96L727-4Date Saupled: 10-Apr-96Date Extracted: 23-Apr-96 Dat,e Analyzed: 24-Apr-9G Project! EnartechDilution Factor: 1:1Matrix: Water Method: 548 Concentration Endothal-1 l_45-73-3 Meeting The Analytical challenges of A changing world since I96I B/RRINGER L AB OR AT O RI E S, /NC 15mO W. 6tH AVE., SUIrE 3OO GOLDEN, CO 80401 (3m) Zn-16& FAX (303) 2n-$89 AquaTec SYstems, Inc. Diquats & #4 Composite 6 -MaY- 95 Page: R-15 Job: 96L7278 Status: Final Sample Id: I{ELL #1 Lab Id: 96L727-4 Date Sampled: 19-APr-95 Date Extracted: 23-APr-96 Date Analyzed: 23-APr-95 Project: EnartechDilutioa Factor: 1:1 llatrix: Water Method: 549.1 ConcentraEion 85-00-? l_91-0 -42-5Diquat Paraquat MeetingThe Analytical Challenges Of A ChangingWorld Since 196l 15000 w. 6rH AVE., Sample Id NGER LABORATORIES,/NC surTE 300 coLDEN, CO 8o4ol (3ost 277_1ff7 FAX (303) zn4ffjs AquaTec Systems, Inc. QUALITY COIIIROTJ REPORT 5 -May- 95Page: e-1Job: 96L7278St.atus: Final Antimony Arsenic Barium Bery1liumTotal Total Total fotatmq/l mq/l mq/I mcr/I Cadmium TotaI mq/1 U 1_.00t. o7 107 u U NC 95.2 Blank LCS (True) LCS (Found) LCS ? Rec Duplicate Duplicate RPD Spike ? Rec Samnle fd U 0. 050 0.053 105 U U NC 9r_.5 mq/1 U 0.050 0.049 97 .6 U U NC 99.0 U 0 .050 0.047 94.0 U U NC 94 .5 u 10.0 9.99 99.9 o.'J"2o.t2 0.2 100 U 1. 00 0. 99 98.8 U U NC LO2 BIank LCS (True) LCS (Found) LCS t Rec Dupli-cate Duplicate RPD Spike ? Rec Samole rd Chromium Copper Lead Mercury NickelTotal Tota1 Tot.al Total Totalmq/I mq/1 mq/1 mq/I mq/IUUUUU2.OO 2.00 o. o5o 0. o05o 5. o02.06 2.02 0.053 0. oo52 5. 08103 101_ Lo7 104 L02u 0.09 u 0. 001_7 uu 0.09 u 0.001-4 uNC 4.2 NC 19.9 NC1,O4 103 1L5 97 .4 LOz Selenium Sodium Thallium Cyanide FluorideTotal Tota1 Total Total Blank LCS (True) LCS (Found) LCS ? Rec Duplicate Duplicate RPD Spike ? Rec mq/1 U 20.0 2A.9 104 L9 l9 l_.3 NA mq /1 mcr/I mq/IUUU0.050 0.200 5.000.049 0.2l.o 5.2598.8 l_05. 10su u L.Lou u 1-t_sNC NC 4.4Al-11 109 l_14 Meeting The Analytical challenges of A changing world since 196l BAIU?INGER L AB OR AT ORI E S, /NC 15000 w. 6rH AVE., SUTTE 300 GOLDEN, CO 80401 p$l2n-1$7 FAX (303) 277-189 Systens, Inc. COIITROI, REPORT Sulfat.e Ni.t,rate+Nit,rite as N Sample Id 6 -May- 95 Page z Q-2 Job: 95L7278 Status: Fina1 AquaTec QUAIJITY mq/1 U 40.0 40.4 L0L r_04 104 0.1 99.0 mcr/1 Blank LCS (True) LCS (Found) LCS ? RCC Duplicate Duplicate RPD Spike ? Rec U 4.77 4 .64 97 :3 0.8 0.8 0.5 107 MeetingThe Analytical Challenges Of A ChangingWorld Since /,961 8/RRINGER L AB ORAT ORr E S,/NC 15000 w 6rH AVE., SUrrE 3oo coLDEN, CO 80,!01 (fi31 2n-1657 FAx (303) 277-1@s AquaTec Systems, Inc. Sample Id Duplicate Duplicat.e RERStd (found value)Std (true value)Std ? rec. Blank Spike ? rec. Samole Id 5 -May- 96Page: Q-3Job: 96L72'78 Stat.us: Final QUALITY COTITROt Gross AlphaTotalpCi./l + 2o REPORT Gross Beta Total -pei/l + 2ot7 15 0.10 96 t-01 95 0.5 83 +L3 t13 *4 +0.5 42 tTl46 r18 0.14 105 +2 93 ]-12 0.5 +0. 5 11_3 F.n-222 Total oCi/l + 2o Ra-226 Total oCi/1 +2oDuplicate Duplicate RERStd (found value)Std (true value)Std ? rec. BIank Spike ? rec. 0.1 +0.30.3 11.8 0 .15 11L +4 r-04 1070.1 +0.L r-18 1970 +l-30 1890 tL30 0 .20 1-0400 t200 103 00 101 0 t1l-2 NA MeetingThe Analytical challenges of A changingworrd since 196I Lab Id: vb1k315 Dat,e Sampled: NA Dat,e Extracted: NA Date Analyzed: 18-Apr-95 ChloromethaneVinyl Chloride Bromomethane Chloroethane Tr i chloro f luorome thane 1, 1 -Dichloroethene Methylene Chloride trans - !, 2-Dichloroethene 1, l--Dichloroethane 2 ,2-Dichloropropanecis - l- , 2 -Dichloroet.hene Chloroform Bromochloromethane 1, l-, 1-Trichloroethane 1, L-DichloroproPene Carbon Tetrachloride 1, 2-Dichloroethane Benzene Trichloroethene 1-, 2 -DichloroproPane Bromodichloromethane Dibromomet,hane trans - 1-, 3 -DichloroProPene Toluene cis - L, 3 -DichloroPropene I , a ,2-Trichloroethane L, 3 -DichloroproPane Tetrachloroethene Dibromochloromethane l-, 2-Dibromoethane Chlorobenzenel, 1, 1, 2 -Tetrachloroethane Ethylbenzene m, p-Xylene ortho-Xylene Styrene Isopropylbenzene Bromoform!, L, 2, 2 -TeLrachloroethane L ,2 ,3 -TrichloroProPane 5.5 5 -May- 95 Page z Q-4 Job: 95]-7278 St,atus: Final u 1.0u 1-.0u L.0u 1.0u 0.5u 0.5 0.5 NGER LABORATORIES,/NC 15m0 w. drH AVE., SUITE 300 GOLDEN, CO 80401 (3$l Zn-1N7 FAX (303) 2n.168p AquaTee Systems, Inc. QUALITY COMIROT REPORT Project: EaartsectrDilution Factsor: 1:1 Matrix: Water Metlrod: 524.2 Concent.ration Analvte CAS Number Pq'] MDIJ ffiiomethane 't5-7L'8 u l-'o 74-87 -3 75 - 01-4 74-83-9 75-00-3 75-69-4 75-35-4 75-09-2 155 -50 - 5 75-34-3 590-20-7 156 -59 -4 67 -65-3 74-97 -5 71-55-6 553 -58 - 5 56-23-5 LO1 -06-2 7L-43-2 79-0]--5 78-87 -5 75-27 -4 74-95-3 1006r- -02-6 L08 - 88 -3 r-005L- 01-5 79-00-s L42-28-9 L27 -L8-4 L24-48-L l-06 - 93-4 108-90-7 530-20-6 L00-41-4 M+P 95-47 -6 r-oo-42 -5 98-82-8 75-25-2 79-34-5 95 -18 -4 u 0.5u 0.5-u 0.5u 0.5u 0.5u 0.5u 0.5u 0.5u 0.5u 0.5u 0.5u 0.5u 0.5u 0.5u 0.5u 0.5u 0.5u 0.5u 0.5u 0.5u 0.5u 0.5u 0.5u 0.5u 0.5u 0.5u 0.5u 0.5u 0.5u 0.5u 0.5u 0.5u 0.5 MeetingThe Analytical Challenges Of A ChangingWorld Since 1961 NGER LABORATORIES,/NC 15000 w. 6TH AVE., SUrrE 3oo coLDEN, CO 80401 ({s) 2r,-16f,7 FAX (303) 277_1fy,s AquaTec Systems, Inc. QUALTTY COr[rRoL REPORT 6 -May- 9 5 Page: Q-5Job: 96L727E, Status: Final Lab Id: vbLk315Date Sampled: NA Dat,e Extracted: NA DaE,e Anal.yzed: 18-Apr-96 Project: EnartechDilution Factor: 1:1Matrix: Wat,er Method: 524.2 Concentration n-Propylbenzene BromobenzerLe l-, 3, 5 -Trimethylbenzene 2 -Chlorotoluene 4-Chlorotoluene tert-Butylbenzene 1, 2, 4-Trimethylbenzene sec-Butylbenzene p- Isopropyltoluene 1, 3 -Dichlorobenzene 1, 4 -Diehlorobenzene n-Butylbenzene L, 2 -Dichlorobenzene 1, 2 -Dibromo-3 -Chloropropane L, 2, 4-Trichlorobenzene Hexachlorobutadiene Naphthalene 1- ,2 ,3 -Trichlorobenzene 103-55-1 108 - 85 -1 108-57-8 9s-49-B L05-43 -4 98-05-6 95-53-6 135 -98 - I 99-87 -6 541- 73 -1- 1,06 -46 -7 104-51-B 95-50-r" 95-].2-8 1,20-82-L 87-68-3 91 -20 -3 87 -61-6 U U U U U U U U U U U u U U U U U U 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 o.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 75-1"25% 75-]-252 p-Bromofluorobenzene 1, 2 -Dichlorobenzene -d4 MeetingThe Analytical challenges of A changingworld since t96l Lab Id: vblk314 Date Sarrpled: NA Date Extracted: NA Date Analyzed: 17-Apr-95 Bromodichloromethane Dibromochloromethane Bromoform TTHM 5 -May- 9o Page: Q-6 Job: 96L727B Status: Final u 0.5u 0.5u 0.5u 1.0 6rH AVE., SUrTE 300 GOLDEN, CO 80401 (303) 27l-1687 FAx (303) 277-168e AquaTec Systens, Inc. QUALTTY COIITROL REPORT Project: EnartechDilution Factor: 1:1 Matrix: Watser Metshod: 524.2 ConcentraEion Analyte CAS Number PqlI MDtr Cfrt-orotorm 57-65:3 U 0'5 BARRINGER L ABOR ATORI E S, /NC '15m0 w. 75-27 -4 L24-48-L 75-25-2 p-Bromofluorobenzene 1 , 2 -Dichlorobenzene-d4 75-L252 75-L25* MeetingThe Analytical Challenges Of A ChangingWorld Since 196I p/RR/NGER L A B O R AT O R r E S,/Nc 15000 w.6rH AVE., SUrrE 300 coLDEN, CO 80401 {3ogl zn-16s7 FAX (303) 277-1689 AquaTec Systems, Inc. QUAT,ITY COIITROt REPORT Lab fd: Method BlankDate Sanpled: NADate Extracted: 17-Apr-9G Dat,e Analyzed: 18-Apr-9G 5 -May- 95Page: Q-7Job: 96L72'78 Status: Final Project: EnarteehDilution Factor: L:LMatrix: Water Method: 504 ConcentraLion 1, 2 -Dibromoethane l- , 2 -Dibromo- 3 -Chloropropane L, 2, 3-Trichloropropane l_05 - 93 -4 95-12-8 96-L8-4 U U U 0 .025 o .025 0.050 Fllrog*te , Recovery Umir Meeting The Analytical challenges of A changingworld since 196l INGER L ABORATORI E S, /NC 15000 w 6rH AVE., SUTTE 300 GOLDEN, CO 80401 (3$) 2n4W7 FAX (303) 2n4ffi9 AquaTec Systerns, Inc . QUALITY COIITROL REPORT 6 -May- 95 Page: Q-8 Job: 96L727E, Status: Final Lab Id: Method Blank Date Sarrpled: NA Date ExEraeted: 17-Apr-95 Date Analyzed: 18-Apr-96 Project: Enartectr Dilution Factor: 1:1 Matrix: Wat,er Method: 505 Concentration Alachlor AIdrin Atrazine Chlordane alpha-Chlordane gamma-Chlordane Dieldrin Endrin Heptachlor HepEachlor Epoxide Hexachlorobenzene Hexachlorocyc lopentadi ene Lindane Methoxychlor cis-Nonachlortrans-Nonachlor Simazine ToxapheneAroclor L0L6Aroclor L22LAroclor L232Aroclor L242Aroclor 'L248 Aroclor L254Aroclor t26O 5972-50-8 309-00-2 L9L2-24-9 57 -74-9 5103 -7L-9 5l_03 -74-2 60-57-1 72-20-8 76-44-8 LO24-57 -3 l_18-74-L 77 -47 -4 58-89-9 72-43-5 5103 -73-L 39765 -80-5 L22-34-9 800L-3 5 -2 L2674-Lt-2 L1L04 -28-2 r.r_r.41-16 -5 s3469-2L-9 L2672-29-6 11097 - 69 -l- 11-095 -82-5 U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U u U U U U U U U U 0.50 0 .075 2.5 2.O 0 .085 0 .055 0 .055 0 .070 0.15 0 .055 o.o27 0.L9 0.040 0.25 o .055 o .092 4.0 3.0 0 .50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0 .50 0.50 TCX DCB 64-LAL* 59-131? MeetingThe Analytical Challenges Of A ChangingWorld Since 1961 8ARR/^rGER L AB OR AT O Rr E S,/Nc 15000 w.6TH AVE., SUTTE 300 coLDEN, CO 80401 (sO3) 277-16Sl FAX (303) zn_168g AquaTec Systems, Inc. QUAI,ITY CO}iI:TROL REPORT Lab Id: Method BlankDate Sarpled: NA DaEe ExtracEed: 1,9-Apr-95 Date Analyzedz 24-Apr-96 5 -May- 95 Page: Q-9Job: 96L'727F,Stat,us: Final Projects EnartechDiLution Factor: 1:1Matrix: Water Method: 515.1 Concent,ration 3, 5-Dichlorobenzoic Acid 4 -Nitrophenol Dicamba Dichlorprop 2,4-D Pentachlorophenol 2 ,4 ,s-TP (Silvex) Chloramben 2,4,5-T 2 ,4-DB Dinoseb Bentazon Picloram DCPAAcifluorfen 94-74-6 5L-35 - 5 100- 02-7 r_9L8-00-9 ]-2a-35-5 94-75-7 87-86-5 93-72-L 133-90-4 93 -7 6-5 94-82-6 88-85-7 25057-89-0 1918 -02-L L897 -45-6 50594-66-6 U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U L.0 0.l_25 o. r_6 0 .15 0 .43 0.38 0. L0 o.L2 0 .1_0 0. r_2 0.50 0.30 o.26 0.10 0.20 o. 18 surroqat.e Recovery LimitDCAA 1_1-7e" 72-L3,te" Meeting The Analytical challenges of A changingworrd since 196l RR/NGER L AB ORATORI E S, /NC r5m0 w. 6rH AVE., SUTTE 300 GOLDEN, CO 80401 (3$l 2n4ffi7 FAX (303) 277-1ffi9 AquaTec QUAIJITY Lab Id: L727 -$BDate Sarrpled: NA Date Extracted: 22-Apr-96 Date Arralyzed: 3-May-96 AIdrin Heptachlor Epoxide gamma-Chlordane Butachlor alpha-Chlordane trans-Nonachlor Pyrene Endrin Butylbenzylphthalate bis ( 2 -ethylhexyl ) adipate Benzo (a) anthracene Chrysene 5 -May- 95 Page: Q-10 Job: 96L727E, Status: Final Systems, Inc. COMTROI, REPORT Projeet: EnartechDilution Factor: 1:1Matrix: Water Method: 525.1 Concentrat.ion Analyte CAS Number !rql1 MDL Hexachl orocyc 1 opent adiene Dimethylphthalate Acenaphthylene 2 -ChlorobiphenylDiethylphthalate Fluorene PropachlorTrifluralin 2, 3 -Dichlorobiphenyl Hexachlorobenzene Simazine Atrazine Pentachlorophenol Lindane Phenanthrene Anthracene Metribuzin 2 , 4 ,5-TrichlorobiphenylAlachlor Heptachlor Metolachlor Di-n-butylphthalate 2,2, 4, 4-Tetrachlorobiphenyl 2437-79-8 77 -47 -4 t-3t -11-3 208-96-8 2051-60-7 84-66-2 86-73-7 r-91-8 -L6-7 1,582-09-8 l_6605 -9L-7 tL8-74-1- ]-22-34-9 L9L2-24-9 87-85-5 s8-89-9 85 -0r-- I L20-L2-7 2LO87 -64-9 15852 -07 -4 5972- 60 - 8 76-44-8 51218 -45-2 84-74-2 U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U 2.8 U U U U U U u U U U U U U U U U u u 0.6J 0.1 0.3 0.1 0. t- 0.6 0.L o.2 o.2 o.2 o.2 o.2 0.3 3.0 0.1 o.2 0 .1- o.2 0.L 0.3 o.2 o.2 1.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.2 0 .1- 0.1 0.L 0.1 l-.0 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.3 0 .1_ 0.8 U U U U U U 2 ,2 ,3 , 4 ,6-Pentachlorobiphenyl 60233 -25-2 309-00-2 LA24-57 -3 5L03 -74-2 238L4-66-9 5103 -7L-9 39765-80-5 L29- 00 - 0 72-20-8 85-68-7 l_03 -23 -1 56 -55 -3 2L8- 0r.- 9 2, 2, 4, 4,5, 5-Hexachlorobiphenyl 601-45 -22-4 2, 2,3,3, 4, 4,.6-HepEachlorobiphe 52663-7L-5 Methoxychlor 72-43-5 2,2,3,3, 4,5, 6, 6-Octachlorobiph 40185-71-8 bis (2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate LL7-81-7 MeetingThe Analytical Challenges Of A ChangingWorld Since 1961 I|IRR/NGER L A B OR AT O Rr E S, /NC 15000 w. 6rH AVE., SUTTE 300 coLDEN, CO 8(MO1 (3Os) ?71-1657 FAX (SOs) zn4eflg AquaTec Systems, Inc. QUALITY COI{TROIJ REPORT Project: EnartectrDiLution Factsor: 1:1Matrix: Water Method: 525.1 ConcentrationAnalyte CAS Number n.o /1 Lab Id z L727 -AIBDate Sampled: NA DaLe Extracted: 22-Apr-95 Datse Analyzed: 3-May-95 6 -May- 95 Page: Q-L1Job: 96L727E Status: Final MDT, Benzo (b) fluoranthene Benzo (k) fluoranthene Benzo (a) pyrene Indeno (L ,2 , g -cd) pyrene Dibenzo (a, h) anthracene Benzo (9, h, i)perylene 205-99-2 207-08-9 50-32-8 193-39-5 53 -70-3 L9t-24-2 u 0.3u 0.3u 0.1u 0.1u 0.Lu 0.1_ Sqrrogate Recoverv T,i mi r Perylene-d12 103?65-L202 Meeting The Analytical Challenges Of A Changing Wortd Since 196l B/RRINGER L A B OR AT O RI E S, /NC 1s000 w. 5rH AVE., surTE 300 GoLDEN, CO 80401 (30,3) 2n-1N7 FAX (303) zn-1ffig AquaTec Systems, Inc. QUAI,TTY COIITROI, REPORT Project: EnartechDilutlon Factor: 1:1 Itlatrix: $Iat,er Method: 531.1 Concentration An=] rrt-a CAS Nrrmt'ler uo /l MDI, 5 -May- 95 Page z Q-L2 .Tob: 96L7278 Status: Fina1 Lab Id: Method Blank Dat,e Samgrled: NA Date Extracted: NA Date Analyzed: 17-Apr-96 Aldicarb SulfoneAldicarb Sulfoxide OxamyI Ivtethomyl 3 -IlydroxycarbofuranAldicarb Propoxur (Baygon) Carbofuran Carbaryl Methiocarb 1546-87 -4 L646- 87-3 23135 -22-O 16752-77 -5 15555- 82-6 r_r.6-05-3 L]-4-26-]- L563 -56-2 63-25-2 2032-65-7 U U U U U U U U U U 2.O 2.O 2.O 0.5 2.O l_. 0 r-.0 1.5 2.O 4.0 MeetingThe Analytical Challenges Of A ChangingWorld Since 196I E4RR/NGER LABORATORIES,/NC page, .-*"I_?3 1s000 w. 6TH AVE., sulrE s00 coLDEN, co Bo4o1 (s$) zn_16s7 FRx (3o3) zn4ffis J"b , 9GL727EStatus: FinalAquaTec Systems, Inc. QUALITY COIITROL REPORT Project: EnartechDiLution Fact,or: 1:1Matrix: Water Method: 548 ConcentrationAnalyte CAS Number uq/L MDL Lab Id: Method Blank Dat,e Sampled: NA Date Ext,racted: 23-Apr-95Date Arralyzed: 23-Apr-95 Endothall L45-73-3 20U Meeting The Analytical challenges of A changing world since 196r 6 -May- 95 Page: Q-14 .Tob: 9617278 Status: Final AquaTec Systems, Inc. QUAI,ITY CONTROL REPORT Project: EnartsechDilution Factor: 1:1 Matrix: Water Method: 549.1 Concentration Ana] r.zl-a CAS Number uc /I MDI, BARRINGER L AB OR AT ORI E S, /ATC 15000 w. 6rH AvE., SUITE 300 GOLDEN, CO 80401 (303) 277-1687 FAX (303) 277-1689 Lab Id: Method BLank DaEe Sarpled: NA Date ExtracEed: 23-Apr-95 Date Analyzed: 23-Apr-95 Diquat Paraquat 8s-00-7 1910 -42-5 U U 5.0 5.0 MeetingThe Analytical Challenges Of A ChangingWorld Since 1961 TNGER L AB OR ATO RI E S,/NC 15000 w. 6rH AVE., SUTTE 300 GOLDEN, CO 80401 (3$) Zn-1657 FAX (303) Zn-l€fls AquaTec Syst.ems, P.O. Box 488 Glenwood Springs, Inc. co 81502 At,tn: Ralph CourterProject: Enartech Job: 96A72'7E Po #: Page: 6 -May-95 Q-1s Received z !7-Apr-95 L0 : 00 Sl.atrrsr - E'i na'l Abbreviations: ParameLers: Ra-226 Ptn-222 TTHM Methods:. M+P Unit.s: ms/lpci/1 l-Lg/l z? Rec. Oualitv codes: A B J NA NR T U NC Radium- 226 Radon-222Total Trihalomethanes : L0B-38-3 m-xy1ene, 105-42-3 p-xylene : milligrams per liter: picoCuries per liter: micrograms per liter: percent: ? Recovery Analytical Spike Used Present in blank Estimated value Not Analyzed Not requested Surrogate recovery outside reporting limit Undetected Not Calculated MeetingThe Analytical Challenges Of A ChangingWorld Since 196l lsqrc w. 6T H AVE., SUITE 300 GOLOEN, CO 80401 (3$l 2n-1ffi7 FAX (303) Zn-189 RRINGER L AB ORAT ORI E S, /NC Inc. co 81502 Attn: Ralph Courter Project: Enartech Receivedz L7-Apr-95 10:00 ,Tokr: 96a'7278 Status: Final 5 -Ivlay- 96 Page: Q-15AquaTec Systems, P.O. Box 488 Glenwood Springs, QUALITY COIIrROL DATA SEEET Received by: rc Via: UPS Sample Container fiPe: 41 PI, 500m1 Additional Lab Preparation: None Parameter Method Preservative pI, LI amber, 40m1 vial lnrt Analysis Dates sb 204.2 As 206.2 Ba 200.7 Be 200.7 cd 200.7 Cr 2OO.7 Cu 200.7 Pb 239.2 Hg 245.L Ni 2oo -7 Se 270.2 Na 200.7 T1 279.2 cN 335.4 F 340.2 so4 300 - 0 NO3+NO2 353.2 Gross Alpha 900.0 Gross Beta 900.0 F.a-226 SM-705 Rn-222 901.1 Volatile Organics 524.2 Trihalomethanes 524.2 EDB & DBCP 504 Pesticides 505 Herbicides 5L5. L Semi-Volatiles 525.1 Carbamate PesEicides 531. l- Endothall 548 HNO3 AW ITNO3 AW HNO3 irH HNO3 ,IH HNO3 RS I{NO3 RS HNO3 .II{ HNO3 AW HNO3 AVI HNO3 JH HNO3 AW HNO3 iIH HNO3 AW 4oclNaoH RS 4oC AW 4oC SSM 40c/H2so4 RS HNO3 ME HNO3 ME HNO3 ME None MS 4 oc/Ascorbic/ucI 'JG4oC/Ascorbic JG 40c/Hcl-/Na2S203 cc4oc,/Na2s2o3 cc40c/Na2s203 cc 40c/HcL/Na2SO3 RH - l-o oclMcAB/ttazszo: cc 4oC CC osl08 04/2e 04/24 04 /24 os/06 os/06 04/24 04 /2s 04/22-04/2s 04/2s 04/2s 04/24 os/07 04/24 04/24 04/2e 04/26 04/22-04/2s 04/22-04/25 o4/26-04/3004/t7 04/L8 04/L7 04/L8 04/L8 04/25 osl03 04/L8 04/24 MeetingThe Analytical Challenges Of A ChangingWorld Since 1961 E4RR/NGER L AB OR ATO Rr E S,INC 15000 W. 6T H AVE., SUTTE 900 GOLOEN, CO 80,t01 @$l zn46s7 FAX (303) zn-lffis AquaTec Systems, P.O. Box 488 Glenwood Springs, Inc. co 8L602 5 -May- 95Page: Q-17 Received: L7-Apr-9G 10:00Attn: Ralph CourterProject: Enartech Diquat 549.l_ Barringer Laboratories, Inc. will30 days from the date your finalspecified by contract. Barringerto return samples prior to the 30our license. 4 oclNa2S2O3 /H2SO4 04 /23 return or dispose of your samplesreport is mailed, unless otherwiseI-raboratories, Inc. reserves the right,days if radioactive leveIs exceed M e eting The Analytical challenge s of A changing wo rtd sinc e I 96 I R I'- rr i r..'r rr.- _ r &!i 1in96 18 -Apr- 95 Receivedt 11-apr-95 10:35 PO trRRINGER L AB ORAT ORI E S, /AIC. r5000 w. 5tH AVE., SUITE 30O GOLDEN, CO 80401 (3O3) 277-16Sl FAX (303) Zn-189 Ralph Couter AQUA TEC ENARTECH P.O. Box 488 Glenwood SPrings, CO 8l-502 Att.n:Project: RaPids A}IALYTICAI. REPORT PACKAGE CASE NARRJATIVE. . . AIIAITYTICAL RESULTS. ' ' ' 'R-L Q- r- a MeetingThe Arutytical Challenges Of A ChangingWorld Since 1961 RR/NGER L A B ORATO RI E S,/NC 15000 w. 6TH AVE., SUITE 3oo coLDEN. CO 80401 (fi31 2n-16s7 FAX (303) Zn_1efls Ralph Couter AQUA TEC ENARTECHP.O. Box 488 Glenwood Springs, CO 8l-602 At.tn:Project: Rapids 18-Apr-9GPage: i Received: 11_Apr_96 t-O :35PO #: CASE NARRATIVE A total of 1 water -sample was received on 11-Apr-95. As stated inthe chain of custody, the sample was run for tire following analysis:Rn-222- A tabIe, to cross reference your sample rD to ours, isattached- our procedures are summari-zed on t-he euality control DataSheet. Quality control standards for organic and inorganic analyses followedlht appropriate sw-845 or EPA me[hodology. quality control standardsfor radiochemistry fo1Iowed our standar6.- operatir,.! procedures orcontractual requirements . Signed: Radiochemistry Manager Meeting The Analytical chaltenges of A changingworld since I96t NGER LABORATORIES,/NC 15000 W. 5rH AVE., SUTTE 300 GOLDEN, CO 80401 (3o3) Zn-$S? FAX (303) 277-189 Ralph Couter AQUA TEC ENARTECH P.O. Box 488 Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 Attn:Project: Rapids 18 -Apr- 95 Page: ii Received: 11-Apr-95 l-0 :35 PO #: Job: 96a6928 St.atus : Final I-,ab- ID Matrix Client Sample ID Sampled 95L692-t Water Rapids WeIl #r 10 -Apr- 95 MeetingThe Analytical Challenges Of A ChangingWorld Since 196l 150m w. 5TH AVE., SUTTE 300 GOLDEN, CO 80401 (3m) 2r-16Al FAX (3O3) 277_1689 18 -Apr- 9o Page: R-l Job: 96L692E Stat.us: Final AQUA TEC ENARTECH Arralyte t Rrr-222Fraction: Total Method: 901.1 Units z pCi-/L Date Lab fd Sampled Matrix Sample Id Concentration+ 2o LLD961592-1 10-Apr-95 Water Rapids Well #r 1280+L70 1_50 NGER LABORATORIES,/NC Projects: Rapids Date Analyzed: 12-Apr-95 LtD: 150 Meeting The Analytical Challenges Of A ChangingWorld Since 196I 8/RR/NGER L AB ORAT ORI E S, /NC 15m0 w. Samole Id 18 -Apr- 95 Page: Q-lJob: 95L692E Status: Final Duplicate Duplicate RERStd (found val-ue) SLd (true value) Std % rec. Blank Spike % rec. 5rH AVE., SUrrE 300 GOLDEN, CO 80401 (303) 27l-1687 FAX (303) 277iffi9 AQUA TEC ENARTECH QUAIJITY COIiTTROL REPORT P<n-222 Total nCi/l + 2o l-280 t170 1360 t170 0.22 10300 +200 10300 r-0 00 +114 NA Meeting The Anqlytical Challenges Of A ChangingWorld Since 196l /NGER L AB ORATOR I E S, /NC '15000 w. 5TH AVE., SUTTE 300 coLDEN, CO 80401 (W3l Zn-1N7 FAX (3O3) Zn-lffis Ralph Couter AQUA TEC ENARTECH P.O. Box 488 Glenwood Springs, CO 81502 Attn:Project: Rapids ,Jqb: 9616921 PO Page: 1B -Apr- 96 Q-2 Received: lL-Apr-96 L0 :35 .Stal-rrs: F'inal Abbreviations: Parameters: Rn-222 Units:pci/1 Ouality codes: NA : Radon-222 : picoCuries per liter : Not Analyzed Meeting The Analytical Challenges Of A Changing World Since I96t a/RRTNGER L A B ORAT ORr E S, lNC 15()00 W. 6rH AVE., SUTTE 30o GOLDEN, CO 80401 (fi3t, 277-187 FAX (303) Zn-1689 Ralph Couter AQUA TEC ENARTECH P.O. Box 488 Glenwood Springs, CO 81502 Attn: Project: Rapids Received: 1l--Apr- 96 L0 PO #: Job: 9516928 Status: Fina]. Received by: rc QUAI.ITY COMIROI, DATA SHEET Via: UPS Sample Container Tlpe: 500m1 amberAdditional Lab Preparation: None Paramet,er Method Rn-222 901.l- 18 -Apr- 9 5 Q-3 Preservative 40c Analysis Init DaLes BS OA/LZ Barringer Laboratories, Inc. will return or dispose of your samples 30 days from t.he date your final report is mailed, unless otherwise specified by contract. Barringer Laboratories, Inc. reserves Lhe right to ::eturn samples prior t.o the 30 days if radioactive lewels exceed our license M e eting The Analytical Clnllenge s Of A Clwnging World Since I 96 I ATTACHMENT 5 Peotective Covenants - The Rapids on the Colorado PUD ATTACHMENT 5 AuBNnvmNT To DBCT,.N.NATION OT PNOTBCTIVE COVTXNTTS FOR rnB RlprDs oN rup ColoRADo Sunnrvrsrox Locarrn rx Gmnnr,o CounrY, Colouoo This Amendmentto the Declaration ofProtective Covenants forthe Rapids onthe Colorado Subdivision Located in Garfield county, colorado (the "covenants")' made this - day of owner in fee of certain reat property situated within Garfield County, Colorado, known as The Rapids on the Colorado and as shown on the Amended Plat thereof recorded in the office of the Clerk and Recorder of Garfield Count at Reception No. ------ (hereinafter .th9 Subdivision,, or theliproperly"), amends the Covenants as recorded in the office of the Clerk and Recorder of Garfreld co'unty, 6olorado at Reception No. 513356, in the following particulars: 1. l.5deletetefi,,andCommonopenSpace(EquineArea).,' 1.9 *plat , shall mean the Final Plat of the Subdivision filed for public record in the Office of the Clerk and Recorder of Garfield County, Colorado as ReceptionNo. 513352' addtut and as amended and recorded as RecepionNo' 1.10 ..property" shall mean the real estate encompassing the Subdivision more particularty described in pxtriUit A attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein' l.l4 *Subdivision" shall mean The Rapids on the Colorado Subdivision, a planned community located in Garfield County, colorado set forth and more particularly described on the Amended plat, add krt and which contains no more than one hundred four (104) Lots' 2.2 Add text2.2.4 Sewage Treatment Facility 5. 5. I I Replace Tert Eachstructure shatl be completed within one (l ) year from the date of the issuance of a Building Permit by Garfield County for such sfucture' g. Replace Tert The Subdivision shall be served by a sewage fieatnent facility maintained bY the Association. 8.1 delete turt 8.1.1 delete text 8.1.2 delete tact 8.1.3 delete text 8.1.4 delete text 8.2 delete tesd delete t&uandCommon Open Space @quine Area)'" add te o'a-" The Association shall own.... b. The Association is responsible for maintaining West Divide Congact as amended and making all payments required thereby' c. TheAssociation shall maintain all necessary water structures on the common elements as are necessary of either domestic or potable water. 13. 13.4 deletekrt 13.5 delete tetd 14. add turt 14.6 The Owner or Owners of each Lot in the Subdivision shall use their best efforts to control the mosquito population with the Subdivision, which shall include, without limitation, the prevention of standing pools of stagnant water on the Lot 14.7 The Owner or Owners of each Lot in the Subdivision shall use their best efforts to control noxious weeds as specified in the weed Management Plan of Garfield County, Colorado andthose specifiedbythe State ofColorado DepartrrentofAgriculture, including, without limitation, the use of herbicides to kill such weeds' 19. delete text 21. add text 21.5 Trail Easement. The Association shall maintain and insure forthe benefit ofthe Pubtic The fail easement and associated parking depicted on the final plat' 11. 12. Arresr: In all other respects, the covenants are hereby ratified and confirmed' RAPP S DTVELOPI]VDNT CORPORATION By Gene R. Hiltoru PresidentMarY J. Hiltoru SecretarY Srere oF CoLoRADo CouNrY or ) ) ) The foregoing was acknowledged before me this - day of - ' ZOO6,by Gene R. Hilton, President of tn" Rapids O..ffi1*.nt Corporation and Mary J' Hilton' Secretary of the Rapids Development Corporation' Wrrurss my hand and seal. My Commission ExPires Notary Public REVISED I I I I I lr lr lr lr lr lr lr l: lr lr lr Garfield County, Colorado PrePared for Rapids DeveloPment CorPoration 2L02 West AraPahoe Drive Garfield County, Colorado 80120-3008 Prepared bY Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 950 Seventeenth Street Suite 1050 Denvet, Colorado 80202 (303)?28-2300 (303) 4464678FeX October 2006 This document, tngether with the concepts and designs pleYnted herein, as an instrument of wntice, is intendeil o"ly i, the specifc purpose and client fur which it -was prepyre!, . Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorimtion and adaptationby Kimley-Horn and Associatcs, lnc. shnllbe without linbility to Kmley-Horn and Associates, lnc. on the Colorado \-:. 3G355 -i a*:.tr*fu,;*i T I t I I lr lr lr lr lr t: lr lr ll TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDICES .......... """"" ii LIST OF TABLES '...'........."" """"""" ii LIST OF FIGURES """""" ii 1.0 EXECUTTVE SUMMARY......... """"""""""' 1 2.O INTRODUCTION """"4 3.0 EXISTING AND FUTURE CONDITIONS ............... """' 6 3.1 Existing Roadway Network... """" 6 3.2 Existing Study Area........... """""" 5 3.3 Existing Traffic Volumes """""""' 6 3.4 Unspecified DevelopmentTraffic Growth""' """"""""" 10 4.0 PROJECT TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS................ """"""""""' 12 4.1Trip Generation """"'12 4.2TrrpDistribution................. """"" 13 4.3 Traffic Assignment ""' 13 A.4TotatBackground Plus Project Traffic """' """""""""""' 13 5.0 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS ............... """""" 17 5.1 Analysis Methodology............... """""""""""17 5.2 Key Intersection Operational Analysis" """" 18 5.4 CR-335 Roadway Segment Analysis"" """"'2'l' 5.5 Project Traffic Volume Increase Calculation """"""""""n' 6.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ..""""'23 Kmley-Horn anil Associates, Inc. 096037000 -The Rapids on tht Colorado Page i APPENDICES t I I I II lr lr lr lr lr l: t: lr lr I' Appendix A - ConcePtual Site Plan Appendix B - Intersection Count Sheets Appendix C - Traffic Growth Calculation Information Appendix D - Trip Generation Worksheets Appendix E - HCS Intetsection Analysis Worksheets Appendix F - HCS Roadway Segment Analysis Worksheets Appendix G - Project Traffic Volume Increase Calculation LIST OF TABTES ruur" r - The Rapids on the Colorado Project Tr#fic Generation ............12 Table 2 - Level of Service DefiniJions """"""""""""17 Table 3 - Interstate 70 New Castle Interchange Westbound Ramps LOS Results ""' 19 Table 6 - CR-335 Roadway Segment LOS Resu1ts.....:."""""" """"""""""' 21 IIST OF FIGURES Figure 2 - Existing Laneage and Contro1...........'..... """"""""""7 Figure 3 - Existing Study Area.......... """"""""""""" 8 Figure 4 - Weekday ExistingTraffic Volumes """"' 9 Figure 5 - 2008 weekday Background Traffic volumes... ........................... 11 Figure 6 - Project Trip Distribution........... """"""" 14 Figure 7 - Project Traffic Assignment...'.......:.....'. """"""""""" 15 Figure 8 - 2008 Background Plus Project Traffic Volumes"' """""""""""' 15 Kmley-Horn and Associntes, Inc. 095037N0 - The Rapids on the Colorado Page ii o a I I I I rl lr lr lr lr lr l: l: lr 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Rapids on the Colorado is a proposed single family residential development located along the north side of County Road 335 (CR-335), just west of Garfield Creek Road (CR-312) in Garfield County, Colorado. The project is anticipated to include 104 single family detached housing units. It is expected that the project would be completed by the end of 2008. Analysis was therefore completed for the 2008 short term horizon' The purpose of this study is to identify project traffic generation characteristics, to identify potential project traffic related impacts on the local street system, and to develop mitigation measures required for identified impacts. Per Garfield County comments, the following existing intersections were included for evaluation in this study: Westbound I-70 Ramp at New Castle Interchange Eastbound I-70 Ramp atNew Castle Interchange Project Access DrivewaYs In addition, the roadway segments of CR-335 adjacent to the project and east of Apple Tree development were included. Any intersections west of the proposed project, including the Silt I-70 Interchange, are not anticipated to be impacted due to the addition of proiect traffic. It is anticipated that only L5 percent of project generated traffic would travel to and from the wesL which results in a minirnal amount of traffic. Primary access to the site is expected to be provided by Interstate 70 and CR-335. Direct access to the residential development is proposed from two fulImovement accesses located along CR-335' The Rapids on the Colorado project is expected to generate approximatehy 1',078 daily weekday trips. of these,82 trips are expected to occur during the weekday morning P"uk hour, while L11 trips are expected during the weekday afternoon peak hour. Kimley-Horn and Associates, lnc. 096037000 - The Rapids on the Colorado Page 7. I I I T lr Irll l: l: t: lr lr l: Distribution of site traffic on the street system was based on the area street system characteristics, existing traffic patterns and volumes, anticipated surrounding development areas, and the proposed access system for the project. Assignment of the project traffic was based on the trip generation described previoutly *d the distributions developed. Based on the analysis presented in this report, Kimley-Hom believes the proposed Rapids on the Colorado residential development will not cause impact to the existing roadway network. The baffic analysis determined the following leconrmendations: . The addition of project tr#fic to the New Castle Interchange (hrterchange 105) of trterstate 70 is anticipated to be less than 20 percent. Therefore, a CDOT Access Permit is not anticipated to be required for this project. Improvements identified for the New Casfle Interchange ramps were found to be needed without construction of the Rapids on the Colorado project. It is understood that CDOT is aware of the interchange operational issues' Therefore, the County shall work with CDOT to implement the following recomrrtendations relative to the interchange: Prior to the addition of project traffic in 2008, It was found that this intersection would benefit from separate left and right hrrn lanes on the off- ramp approach. It is believed that this approach is wide enough to accommodate separate turn lanes for a certain distance. With this improvement, all movements at the intetsection are anticipated to oPerate acceptably. I-70 Eastbound Ramp intersection at New Castle Interchange With the existing traffic, it was found that this intersection would benefit from all way stop conhol. With this improvement,the intersection was found to operate accePtablY. Kmley-Horn and Associates, lnc. 096037000 - The Rapids on the Colorado Page 2 T T I I T lr lr lr lr li l: l: l: lr t: Based upon trip generation calculations, each unit generates approximately 10.25 trips per day per unit. Therefore, any roadway providing access to 40 units 01 more would be above the County threshold of Rural Access of 400 vehicles per day. From evaluating the site plan, it is beteved that this threshold will be exceeded along Paddle Wheel Lane between CR-335 and Canoe Way, and along l,Vhite Water Lane between CR-335 and Steamboat Way. If a.y roadway segments were to be designed to the higher County standard, they should apply within only these segments of the project' .STOp' signs (R1-1) shall be placed on the access street approaches of Paddle Wheel Lane and White Water Lane to CR-335. In addition, 'STOY'or "YIELD" signs shall be placed on the minor street approaches within the residential development, as appropriate. The controlled approach shall be the minor leg of a"T" intersection. All on-site and off-site signing and striping improvements should be incorporated into the Civil Drawings, and conform to Garfield County standards, as well as the Manual on UniformTraffic Control Devices 2003 (MUTCD). Kmley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 096037000 -TIu Rapids on the Colorado Page 3 I I I I lr lr lr lr l: l: li lr lr l, 2.0 INTRODUCTION Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. has prepared this report to document the results of a Traffic Impact Study of future traffic conditions associated with the proposed Rapids on the Colorado residential development to be located along the north side of County Road 335 (CR-335), just west of Garfield Creek Road (CR-312) in Garfield County, Colorado. The vicinity map illustrating the project site location is shown in Figure 1' The project is anticipated to include 104 single family detached housing units. It is expected that the project would be completed by the end of 2008. Analysis was therefore completed for the 2008 short term horizon. The current site plan illustrating the development and access locations is shown in APPendix A. The purpose of this study is to identify project traffic generation characteristics, to identify potential project traffic related impacts on the local street system, and to develop mitigation measures required for identified impacts. Per Garfield County comments, the following exis'fins****."1*'.ffi:,;'ffiT'ilI{fu In additioo the roadway segments of CR-335 adjacent to the project and east of Apple Tree development were included. Any intersections west of the proposed projecf including the Silt I-70 lnterchange, are not anticipated to be impacted due to the addition of project traffic. It is anticipated that only 15 percent of project generated traffic would travel to and from the west, which results in a minirnal amount of tr#fic. primary access to the site is expected to be provided by Interstate 70 and CR-335. Ditect access to the residential development is proposed from two full movement accesses located along CR- 335. These accesses are named Paddle Wheel Lane and \ /hite Water Lane' Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 096037N0 -The Rapids on the Colorudo Page 4 ,*eggz FIGURE 1 THE RAPIDS ON THE COLORADO VICINITY MAP I\|OFITH NTS 090037000 IrI Kimtev-Horn I7 \ o^o Associotes' 'nc' t I I I I IT lr lr lr lr lr l: l: t: t: I T t I ll lr lr h h h l: l: h h 3.0 EXISTING AND FUTURE CONDITIONS 3.1 Exisllng Roodwoy Network The proposed Rapids on the Colorado residential development is to be located along the north side of County Road 335 (CR-335), just west of Garfield Creek Road (CR-312) in Garfield County, Colorado. Primary access to the site is expected to be provided by Interstate 70 and CR-33S. Direct access to the residential development is proposed from two fuII movement access streets located along CR-335. Lr the site vicinity, CR-335 is an undivided roadway providing one through lane in each direction and a 35 mile per hour posted speed limit. Acceleration and deceleration lanes have been constructed along CR-835 at Paddle Wheel Lane and White Water Lane. The New Castle I-70 interchange ramp intersections operate with stop control along the off-ramp approach and contain a single lane in all directions. The intersection lane configuration and control for the sfudy area intersections are shown in Figure 2. 3.2 Existing Study Areq The existing site is comprised of vacant land. Apple Tree development exists to the east of the project. Various commercial uses exist at the hrterstate 70 interdrange. A 153 unit condominium project is being constructed along CR-335, east of the interchange. The project study area including these uses is shown in Figure 3. 3.3 Eristlng Troffic Volumes Existing peak hour tuming movement counts were conducted at the existing study intersections of the New Castle I-70 interchange on Tuesday, August '!.,2006. The counts were conducted during the AM and pM peak hours of adjacent street traffic in lsminute intervals from 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM and 4:00 pM to 6:00 pM on this Tuesday. In additioru daily traffic volume counts were conducted along CR-335 on Tuesday, August '1.,2006. The daily count volume locations were adjacent to the project site and just west of the I-70 interchange' These counts are shown in Figure 4 with count sheets provided in Appendix B. Kmley-Horn and Associates, lnc, 096037N0 - The Rapids on the Colorado Page 6 T I I T ll lr h h h lr l: l: lr l: t: a\ I\IOFITH **9.84 //t ]!rmllutr I lzej FIGURE 2 THE RAPIDS ON THE COLORADO EXISTING LANE CONFIGURATION AND CONTROL I -{ @\-7- -t ?) l- I-t @ r GEN o @ @ Study Areo Key lntersections Project Access Drives Stop Controlled APProoch IfI ''-'=-u"' IZ-! o.o Assoc,ores. ,nc. I I t I ll lr lr lr h lr l: t: h h I t I I ll lr lr lr l: l: l: I\IO]=TH Gorflcld Crcck Rood cR-312 FIGURE 4 THE RAPIDS ON THE COLORADO EXISTING PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES Tuesdoy, August 1, 2006 7:00-8:00 A,M. : 4:15-5:,15 P.M. I ^@6+ @-9;,@N++I\ 66(sq-) o(o) ---) 4e(47) -\ I( o- Tuesdoy, August 1, 2006 7:00 - 8:fi) l.tl' ; *45 - 5:'t5 P.M ,atsYN++{ JT L os(+sr) +- o(l) u- 21(eE) \t FN N Study Areo Key lntersection Project Access Drive <- xX (XX) AM(PM) Peok Hour Troffic Volume [Xx,xxx] Doily Troffic Count 7.an L,-.:---- LI, I ^^^ i"<nninrps ,nc. I I I I IT lr lr lr lr lr l: l: lr lr lr t: 3.4 Unspecified Development Trqffic Growth In order to obtain tralfic volumes for the 2008 horizon year, the existing tr#fic volumes were grown at a 3 percent anrrual growth rate. This growth rate was obtained by identifying and comparing traffic volume growth from counts conducted in 2002 (as obtained from the Garfield County website) as compared with counts conducted in 2006 for this project. Comparison of traffic volumes collected to those reported from2}02, there has been an approximate L4 percent annual increase. With the inclusion of project traffic, the 3 percent growth rate will provide future traffic volumes equivalent to a L4 percent growth rate that has occurred recently. tr additioru traffic anticipated to be generated by the 153-unit condominium project currently being constructed along CR-335 to the east of the New Castle I-70 interchange has been directly added to the background volumes. The 2002 daily traffic volume data and background traffic projections, along with the trip generation calculation for the 153 unit condominium project are included in Appendix C. Weekday background traffic volumes for 2008 are shown in Figure 5' Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 096037M0 - The Raprds on the Colorado Page 1.0 I I T I I Ir lr lr lr lr l: l: lr lr ll l\lC>R-rH **9EZ cR-555 [+eit1 <- 1405) FIGURE 5 THE RAPIDS ON THE COLORADO 2OO8 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC VOLUMES I eEUOo@ )t R- 6e(4s7) <- 0(0) z- 31(140) tstlr 6'A99 N$ z)J 63t? BII\ zo(sq -) o(o) --+ s5(ss) -) IT F@ vOF6 Study Areo KeY lntersection Project Access Drive €- xX (XX) AM(PM) Peok Hour Troffic Volume [xx,xxx] Doily Troffic Count <=n [lx'"i*l',1"",,"" I I T I I T lr lr lr lr lr lr lr t: lr lr 4.0 PROJECT TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS 4.1 Trip Genertrlion Site-generated traffic estimates are determined through a Process known as trip generation. Rates and equations are applied to the proposed land use to estimate taffic generated by the development during a specific time interval. The acknowledged source for trip generation rates is the Trip C*neration Reportt published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). IIE has established trip rates in nationwide studies of similar land uses. For this study, Kimley- Hom used the ITE Trip Generation Report regression equations that apply to Single-Family Detached Housing (210). The entire development is expected to generate approximately 1078 daily weekday trips. Of t1rese,82 trips are expected to occur during the weekday moming peak hour, while 11L trips are expected during the weekday afternoon peak hour. Table 1 summarizes the estimated traffic generation for the proposed Rapids on the Colorado development. The trip generation worksheet is included in Appendix D. These calculations illustrate the equations used, directional distribution of trips, and number of daily trips based on the published ITE rates. Table 1 - The Rapids on the Colorado Proiect Traffic Generation Daily Vehicles Trips Weekday AM Peak Hour Weekday PM PeakHour In Out Total In Out Total Single Family Residential (104unib)1078 21 61 82 70 4t 111 t Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington DC,2003. Tip Generation: An lnformation Report, Seventh Edition, Kimley -Horn and Associate s, lnc. 096037N0 - ru Wds on the Colorado Page 72 I I I I lr lr lr lr lr lr l: l: lr lr I' 4.2 Trip Distribution Distribution of site traffic on the street system was based on the area street system characteristics, existing traffic patterns and volumes, anticipated surrounding development areas, and the proposed access system for the project. The directional distribution of traffic is a means to quantify the percentage of site-generated traffic that approaches the site from a given direcdon and departs the site back to the original source. Based upon existing count information, it is anticipated that traffic generated by the Rapids on the Colorado proiect would distributed 15 percent to and from the west and 85 percent to and from the east. Figute 6 illustrates the expected project trip distribution for the development. 4.3 Trofflc Assignment Traffic assignment was obtained by applying the distribution to the estimated traffic generation of the development shown in Table 1. The Rapids on the Colorado traffic assignments is illustrated in Figure 7. 4.4 Tolql Bockground Plus Proiect Trofflc Site traffic volumes were added to ttre background volumes to represent estimated traffic conditions for the 2008 horizon. These weekday total traffic volumes are illustrated in Figure 8. Kmley-Horn and Associates, lnc. 096A37m0 -The Raprds on the Colorado Page'L3 t t\toFiTH NTS 096037000 ,Nqrgz Gorflcld Crcck Rood 312 FIGURE 6 THE RAPIDS ON THE COLORADO PROJECT TRI P DISTRIBUTION J) NI)t F- e- 4- 652 R,fr)t NNoo I N N J\ _) ---) r0z-\ ^1l( FRoo LEGEND: o @ Study Areo Key lntersection Project Access Drive <- xx%(xx%) lN(oUT) Peok Hour Trip Distribution IfI Kimtev-Horn I7 \ ono Assoc'otes, 'tc' I I I t I lr lr lr lr lr l: lt lr lr l, ,oI }N JT K- os(+sz) <-- 0(o) a- 15(186) \T E; 2)J ^@oooe{yxRg T\ 7o(5q --z o(o) -)5s(62) -\ TT NN N-- s(zs) <- 17(18) 2e)-) te(1r) -) Study Areo Key lntersection Project Access Drive <- XX (XX) AM(PM) Peok Hour Troffic Volume [xx,xxx] Doily Troffic Count FIGURE 8 THE RAPIDS ON THE COLORADO 2OO8 BACKGROUND PLUS PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES 7-fl \f7 \ ond Associotes. tnc. I I I t I lr lr lr lr lr t: t: t: lr l: 5.0 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS I(m1ey-Horr{s analysis of traffic operations in the site vicinity was conducted to determine potential capacity deficiencies in the 2008 development horizon at the identified key intersections. The acknowledged source for determining overall capacity is the current edition of the Highwny C-aprci$ Mnnunlz, 5.1 Anolysis MethodologY Capacity analysis results are listed in terms of Level of Service (LOS). LOS is a qualitative term describing operating conditions a driver will experience while traveling on a particular street or highway during a specific time interval. It ranges from A (very little delay) to F (long delays and congestion). For intersections and roadways in this study area, Kimley-Hom recommends intersection LOS D as the minimum threshold for acceptable operations. Table 2 shows the definition of level of service for signalized and unsignalized intersections. Study area intersections were arnlyzedbased on average total delay analysis for signalized and unsignatized. intersections. Under the unsignalized analysis, the level of service (LOS) for a two-way stop controlled intersection is determined by the computed or measured control delay 2 Transportation Research Board, Highuay Capacity Manual,special Report 209, Washington DC, 2000' Kmley-Horn and Associates, lnc. 096037N0 - TheRapids on the Colorado Table 2 - Level of Senrice Definitions Level of Service Signalized Intersection Average Total Delay (sec/veh) Unsignalized Intersection Average Total Delay (sec/veh) A <10 <10 B >10 and s 20 >10 and < 15 C >20 and < 35 >15 and < 25 D >35 and < 55 >25 and < 35 E >55 and < 80 >35 and < 50 F >80 >50 Definitions prooided from tlu Higlruay Capaci$ Manual, Special Report 209, Transporlation Researdr Board, 2000. Page 17 I I I I and is defined for each minor movement. Level of service for a two-way stop-controlled intersection is not defined for the intersection as a whole. Level of service for a signalized and four-way stop controlled intersection is defined for each approach and for the intersection' 5.2 Key lnlersection Operotionol Anolysis Calculations for the level of service at the key intersections are provided in Appendix E. The existing year analyses are based on the lane geometry a.d intersection control shown in Figure 2. Level of service for the intersections was calculated using HCS 20A0 analysis software. Kimley-Hrn and Associates, Inc. 096037@0 - The Rapids on thc Colorado t ll lr lr lr lr lr lr t: la Page 1.8 I I I T T I I t I T T I I I t I I t I Interstate 70 New Castle Interchange Westbound Ramps The intersection of the westbound Interstate 70 ramps.at the New Castle Interchange is unsignalized, with stop control located on the off-ramp approach. Currently, this intersection has movements that operate acceptably during both AM and PM peak hours. In 2008, the off- ramp approach is anticipated to degrade to a poor level of service during the afternoon peak hour with iust background traffic growth (prior to the addition of project traffQ. Therefore, it was found that this intersection would benefit from separate left and right turn lanes on the off- ramp approach. This will primarily serve the afternoon peak hour traffic exiting westbound I- 70 towards New Casfle. It is believed that this approach is wide enough to accommodate separate tum lanes for a certain distance. With this improvement, all movements at the intersection are anticipated to operate acceptably throughout the 2008 horizon. Table 3 summarizes the level of service results at this existing signalized intersection. Kmley-Horn and Associates, lnc. 096037000 -The Rapids on the Colorado Table 3 - Interstate 70 New Castle Interchange Westbound Ramps LOS Results Scenario & Movement AM Peak Hour PM PeakHour Delay (sec/veh)LOS Delay (secfueh)LOS 2006 Existing Northbound Left/ Through Westbound LeftlThrough/ Right 8.7 17.2 A B 8.3 32.8 A D 2008 Background Northbound Left/Through Westbound Leftl Through/ Risht 8.9 13.0 A B 8.4 701,.7 A F 2008 Background - Improved * Northbound t,eft/ Through Westbound Left/Through Westbound Risht 8.9 17.8 9.7 A C A 8.4 22.4 18.5 A c C 2008 Background plus Project Northbound Left/Through Westbound l-eft/Through Westbound Risht 9.0 19.2 9.8 A C A 8.5 29.9 18.8 A D C * Improved with separate left/through and right turn lanes on off-ramp approach Page 79 I I T T Interstate 70 New Castle Interchange Eastbound Ramps The eastbound ramp intersection at the Interstate 70 New Castle Interchange has movements that operate with a poor level of service during the morning peak hour today during existing traffic. This is due to the heavy southbound left tum movement of traffic leaving New Casflg entering Interstate 70 eastbound. Therefore, it was found that this intersection would benefit from all way stop control to serve existing traffic. With this improvement, the intersection is anticipated to operate acceptably through the 2008 horizon. Table 4 summarizes the level of service results at this existing signalized intersection. Kmlry-Horn and Associates, lnc. 096037000 -Tlu Rapids on the Colorado T t I T T I I I T I I T t t t Table 4 - Interstate 70 New Castle Interchange LOS Results Scenario & Movement AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Delay (secfueh)LOS Delay (secfueh)LOS 2006 Existing Southbound Left/Through Eastbound LeftlThroush/ Rieht 9.6 66.8 A F 8.1 17.0 A c 2008 Background Southbound Left/Through Eastbound L,eftlThroush/ Rieht 9.8 71.7 A F 8.4 22.0 A c 2008 Background Plus Project Southbound L,eft/Through Eastbound Left/Throush / Rieht 10.2 90.6 B F 8.5 25.6 A D 2006 Existing # Eastbound Approach Northbound Approach Southbound Approach 15.00- 10.08 9.81 18.61 B B A C 10.81 9.33 9.64 12.03 B A A B 2008 Background # Eastbound Approach Northbound Approach Southbound Approach 18.18 10.67 11.31 23.87 C B B C 13.39 10.04 70.71 15.91 B B B c 2008 Background Plus Project # Eastbound Approach Northbound Approach Southbound Approach 20.42 11.01 12.73 27.63 C B B D 16.76 10.53 7'1.74 20.29 C B B C # Improved with All Way Stop Control Page 20 t t T I I t I lr lr lr lr lr lr lr lr lr lr 5.3 Prolecl Access Evqluqtion The proposed Rapids on the Colorado access street intersections of Paddle Wheel Lane and White Water Lane along CR-335 were evaluated with this study. It was found that both access street intersections are anticipated to operate acceptably, as shown in Table 5. 5.4 CR-335 Roodwoy Segment Anolysis The roadway segments of CR-335 have been evaluated adjacent to the project site and along CR- 335, just west of the I-70 New Castle Irrterchange. It has been determined that acceptable roadway level of service will result along CR-335 in 2008, with or without the addition of The Rapids on the Colorado project traffic. Results of the analysis ate shown in Table 5 with the calculation sheets provided in Appendix F. Kmley-Horn anil Ass;ociates, Inc. 096037000 - The Rapids on the Colorado Table 5 - The Rapids on the Colorado Project Access LOS Results Scenario & Movement AM Peak Hour PM PeakHour Delay (sec/vehl LOS Delay (sec/veh)LOS Paddle Wheel Lane & CR-335 (A) Eastbound Left/Through Southbound LeftlRisht 7.3 8.8 A A 7.3 8.8 A A WhiteWaterlane & CR-335 (B) Eastbound Left/ Through Southbound l,eftlRight 7.3 9.0 A A 7.4 9.0 A A Table 6 - CR-335 Roadway Segment LOS Results Scenario Adiacent to Proiect West of I-70 Interchange Volume to Capacity Ratio LOS Volume to Capacity Ratio LOS 2006 Existine 0.01 A 0.15 B 2008 Backcround 0.01 A 0.16 C 2008 Backcround Plus Proiect 0.M A 0.23 C Page 2L I I I I I trlr lr lr lr lr lr l: lr lr lr t: 5.5 Proiect Trqffic Volume lncreqse Cqlculotion To determine whether or not the developer of the project would be required to obtain a CDOT Access Permit for this project at the I-70 New Castle interchange, project traffic volume increases have been calculated. Per the State of Colorado Access Code, it has been determined that the addition of project traffic will not increase traffic volumes greater than 20 percent over the 2006 existing volumes (calculations provided in Appendix G). Therefore, zun access permit is not anticipated to be required from CDOT. Kmley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 096037000 - The Rapids on the Colorado Page 22 T I I I I I 6.0 CONCTUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the analysis presented in this repor! Kimley-Horn believes the proposed Rapids on the Colorado residential development will not cause impact to the existing roadway network. The traffic analysis determined the following recommendations: . The addition of project baffic to the New Castle Interchange (Interchange 105) of Interstate 70 is anticipated to be less than 20 petcent. Therefore, a CDOT Access Permit is not anticipated to be required for this project. Improvements identified for the New Castle Interchange ramps were found to be needed without construction of the Rapids on the Colorado project. It is understood that CDOT is aware of the interchange operational issues. Therefore, the County shall work with CDOT to implement the following recorlmendations relative to the interchange: Prior to the addition of project traffic in 2008, It was found that this intersection would benefit from separate left and right tum lanes on the off- ramp approach. It is believed that this approach is wide enough to accommodate separate tum lanes for a certain distance. With this improvement, al1 movements at the intersection are anticipated to operate acceptably. o I-70 Eastbound Ramp intersection at New Castle Interchange With the existing frahfic, it was found that this intersection would benefit from all way stop control. With this improvement,the intersection was found to operate accePtablY. o Based upon trip generation calculations, each unit generates approximately 10.25 trips per day per unit. Therefore, any roadway providing access to 40 units or more would be above the County threshold of Rural Access of 400 vehicles per day. From evaluating the site plan, Kmley-Horn anil Associates, lnc. 096037000 - Tlu Rapids on the Colorado t: lr lr lr lr lr lr lr Page 23 I I I T I lr lr lr lr lr l: l: lr it is believed that this threshold will be exceeded along Paddle \A/heel Lane between CR-335 and Canoe Way, and along White Water Lane between CR-335 and Stearnboat Way. If any roadway segments were to be designed to the higher County standard, they should apply within only these segments of the project. .STOP' signs (R1-1) shall be placed on the access street approaches of Paddle Wheel Lane and lArhite Water Lane to CR-335. In additioru'STOP' or "YIELD" signs shall be placed on the minor street approaches within the residential development, as appropriate. The controlled approach shall be the minor leg of a"T" it:ttetsection' All on site and off-site signing and striping improvements should be incorporated into the Civil Drawings, and conform to Garfield County standards, as well as the Manual on UniformTraffic Control Devices 2003 (MUTCD). Kimley-Horn and Associates, lnc. 095037000 - The Rapids on the Colorado Page 24 APPENDICES Kimley-Horn and Associates, lnc. 096037000 -The Rapids on the Colorado I I t I T lr lr lr lr lr l: l: lr lr lr l: <=n APPENDIX A Conceptuol Site Plon Kimley-Horn and Associates, lnc. 096037000 - The Rapids on the Colorado I I T I lr lr lr lr lr lr l: l: lr lr I' <=n :l rl rl rl rl I I I loi x E$[E EEEE HWH $rxEx' Dlt aurtrf li 'rl* rl []] liItf ' I*itrrl t;ilf. 1 tf;ri {ti,rj TI l?.,t ;l;l $'r ri ffir llliryr [- l t t \ ia H ffiHffi llIrt u MOUilTruN fR{,8fi EFISINDDRIFM. I}!c. {kii rd th nIB*l h*tdo.dt S tnC6dl*B gwriathp'SaN Ths RAPID$ on the C0LORAD0 Planned Unit EleveloPment PRELIMINARY PLAN APPENDIX B lntersection Count Sheels Kimley-Horn and Associatus, lnc. 096037000 - The Rapids on the Colorado I I I I I lr lr lr lr lr l: l: lr lr lr t: <=n File Name : WBRAMPS&BRUCEAM Site Code : 00000000 Start Date :81112006 Page No :1 AllTraffic Data Services, lnc 9660 W 44th Ave Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 www. al ltraffi c d ata. n et 08:00 AM 08:15 AM 08:30 AM AM I I t I lr lr lr lr l: l: I lr lr l: Printed- BKUUE KU Southbound EXIT 105 WB RAMPS Westbound BRUCE RD Northbound EXIT 105\^A MMPS Eastbound Start Time Lefi Thru Risht Peds Left Thru Right I Peds Left | Thru Right Peds Left Thru Right Peds lnl. Total Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 07:15 AM 07:30 AM 07:45 AM 0 0 0 0 094110 108 120 131 10o 11't I 5013040',1606021 0 60150 3260u325005370053400 0000000000000000 152 168 210 180 42 0 1 't52 139 168 1y GrandTorall o 759 90 0l 46 o 138 Ol 36 234 O Ol o o 0 0l 1303T##UI 6 8r:; ro16 ;l i; o 75 ol rs'9 ao.i o ol o o 0 ol Totaroz6l o 58.3 6.9 ol 3.5 o 10.6 ol 2.8 r'a o ol o 0 o ol 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 621226435830 00000000 000000 190120190 50805070 0 0 0 0 93876 1592 13 0 0 0 0 07:fi) AM 07:15 AM 07:30 AM fi',R ATT' 0 94 '11 0 108 120 t3t1 0 0 105 0 {41n 12rl 5013018 60210276015021 3260029 53700425340039 00000 0000000000 152 210 1E0 Total Volutne 0 444 42 0 486 0 e1.4 8.6 0 2106508624.4 0 75.6 0 161220013U 11.6 88.4 0 0 0000u0000 .000 .847 .875 .000 .aaz .875 .000 .774 .OOO .7s6 .800 .824 .000 .000 .E21 .000 .000 .000 .000 .q)o .845 I I I I I I I lr lr lr lr lr l: lr lr lr AllTraffic Data Services, lnc 9660 W 44th Ave Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 www. a lltraffic d ata. n et File Name : WBRAMPS&BRUCEAM Site Code : 00000000 Start Date :81112006 Page No :2 Peak Hour for Entire lntersection Begins at 07:00 AM File Name : WBRAMPS&BRUCEPM Site Code : 00000000 Start Date :81112006 Page No :1 AllTraffic Data Services, lnc 9660 W 44th Ave Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 www. a I ltraffi cd at a. n et 05:00 PM 05:15 PM 05:30 PM I T I I I T I T I I I I I T T I I I I BRUCE Southbound EAI I lUC WtJ KAMI-U Westbound t,KUUtr Northbound EXIT 105 Wts RAMPS Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right Peds Lefi Thru Risht Peds Left Thru Risht Peds Lefi Thru Right Peds lni. Tc{al Factor 1.0 1.O 1.O l.u 1.O 1.0 1.O 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 (X:15PM M:30 PM 04:45 PM u /+.1 zv u0602900s6u0055260 181600190680210700240850 124800164400 154900114000 UUUU000000000000 236 245 24100 0 0 0 000000000000 282 260 268 133/.001326001423001't2900 o o 0 0l 19770 0 0 0lo o o ol 0 0 0 0 't33 105 108 0 1 0 1 21 23 28 060210061310065300 GrandTotall 0 451 223 0l 169 3 733 0l 105 293 0 0 Apprcrr%l o 66.9 33.1 0l 1s.7 0.3 81 0l 26.4 73.6 o 0 Totat %l 0 22.8 11.3 0l 8.5 0.2 37.1 0l 5.3 14.8 0 0 51 47 39 I t I t T I I I I I I I T I I I t I I AllTraffic Data Services, lnc 9660 W 44th Ave Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 www. al ltraffi cd ata. n et Hour Peak Hour for Entire lntersection Begins at 04:45 PM o4:,tSPMl 0 55 26 0 81 I 24 0 85 0 109 I 11 40 0 0 05:00PMl 0 60 21 0 811 21 0 {33 1541 13 U 0 0r 105 0 1291 13 26 0 0 05:30 PM I 0 Totel Vdum % ADo. Total File Name : WBRAMPS&BRUCEPM Site Code : 00000000 Start Date :81112006 Page No :2 0 0 0 000000000000 241 282 260 0 69.1 30.9 0 29.3 70.7 0 0 .911 .769.000.000 .853 T I T T T I t t I t T T T I I I I T I AllTraffic Data Services, lnc 9660 W 44th Ave Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 www. a I ltraffi c d ata. n et File Name : EBRAMPS&BRUCEAM Site Code : 00000000 Start Date :81112006 Page No :1 Printed- Unshifted tsKUUE KU Southbound EXIT 105 EB MMPS Westbound tsHUgE T(U Northbound EXIT 105 EB RAMPS Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Risht Peds Lefr Thru Right I Peds Left Thru Right Peds Left Thru Right Peds lnt. Totd Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 10 1.0 1.0 1.O1.0 1.0 1.0 't.0 1.0 1.0 l.u 1.0 1.O 07:'15 AM 07:30 AM 07:45 AM Yl 6UU11210001241100991700 UUUU00000000o000 026330015270023470025260 14UUU'16090 210150'r50170 189 241 199 0 1 08:00AMl 8s 13 0 0l 0 0 0 0 08:15AMl 73 11 0 0l 0 0 0 0 08:30AMl 89 12 0 0l 0 0 0 011 15 0 0l 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 2515 2132 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10013't6 0 161501214010 GrandTotal I 714 97 0 0l 0 Rpprctro,6 l 88 12 o ol o Total %l 50.4 6.9 0 0l 0 o o ol o 170 214 0l 121 0 100 oo o 0l 0 ,{4.3 55.7 0J 54.8 0 45.2 0o o ol o 12 15.1 ol 8.5 o 7.1 o +a L{ +.-e rt$ 1'oAo File Name : EBRAMPS&BRUCEAM Site Code : 00000000 Start Date :81112006 Page No :2 AllTraffic Data Services, lnc 9660 W 44th Ave Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 www. alltraffi c d ata. n et Peak Hour for Entire lntersec'tion Begins at 07:00 AM 07:00AMl 91 I 0 0 991 0 07:15AM | 112 10 0 0 1221 0 07:30AM I 124 0 0 1161 0 T I I I I lr lr lr lr lr l: l: lr lr Ir t: 180 189 211 0802209025 36o17 14 16 21 15 59 42 70 51 02633001527002317025260 00000000 Totd Vdumo % ADo. Total 0 40.1 59.9 0 +aLt, t-J c r -a+r !oA6 File Name : EBRAMPS&BRUCEPM Site Code : 00000000 Start Date :81112006 Page No :1 AllTraffic Data Services, lnc 9660 W 44th Ave Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 www. alltrafficdata. n et 05:fi) PM 05:15 PM 05:30 PM PM T I I t I lr lr h h h h h l: lr lr lr I,T<UUE KU Southbound EXIT 105 EB RAMPS Westbound BRUCE RD Northbound EXIT 1O5 EB RAMI'S Eastbound StartTime Lefl Thru Risht Peds Left Thru Right Peds Left Thru Right Peds Lefl Thru Risht Peds lnt. Totd Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.O 't.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 l.o 't.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 04:00 PM 04:15 PM ()4:30 PM (M:45 PM 363500453600393600364900 0000000000000000 UJOUU052'100038110032120 I 0 tI 0190100110100120120 172 145 153 't 56 42 0 151 150 159 122 15013010080 0 0 0 13 12 16 10 3611028120229028130 0 0 0 0 0 0 00000000 0 0 0 000000 28 4841 4445 573'f 34 crandTotat I 301 339 O Ol o o o ol O 270 87 Oi 'tuz O 89 0l 1't88 aoorctr%l +z s3 o ol o o o 0l 0 75.6 24.4 0i 53.4 0 46.6 9l'iotargal zs.e z1.s o Ol o 0 0 0l 0 22.7 7.3 01 8.6 o 7.5 0l AllTraffic Data Services, lnc 9660 W 44th Ave Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 www. a lltraffi cd ata. net I I I T lr lr lr h l: l: h t! File Name : EBRAMPS&BRUCEPM Site Code : 00000000 Start Date :81112006 Page No :2 2S010021 :rom 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 lntersection Begins at M:15 PM 621 19+sl 11 Ittl 13 521003811032 t236110 0 0 0 0 000000000000 75 85 76 0 0 45393603649028 t08 0 Peak Hour for M:15PM I Oa:30 PM I M:45 PM I O5:OO PM I Rioht Thru Lefl PedsJlr r_JJ =E--|F z.LE+ 6olc I I r I I IIIIIII AllTraffic Data Services, lnc. 9660 W44th Ave \Mreat Ridge, CO 80033 wvrnltr.alltrafficdata. net I I I I I I I Page 1 COLORADO RIVER RD W/O BRUCE Site Code: 1 Time 01-Aug-06 Tue \A/Blz:OOAM 2 11 13.,{s'..'.,..'ii::..]].:i:lli.**{l.}.ii]j,jl..'..i:.i:i.]]::].iii.'w 02:00 7 2 9..,@..''.]..';.'.il]iiil'':..'::W}$''..r-....'..'.',.,....,.'....:''..'..i:'i-'.,,...!aO,t:00 3 15 18, .!W 1.;':,, I.,':1'11.fl!!$|ftlxi*!&{:1.*.1- }:i1}i.t{!,. _,. ..r . J 1:<. .'.. . rtr,06:00 172 125 291, :,,,,::€=e *"i*l.*Kr ti€j,.{;!iitl..']r:la?tiir.:.l]yr.:aj}ra,1::ti_;,..rt...r. : :.: ' . . :='.=_=-:/r,G08:00 '175 172 U7.a!e' '"",.-, r,.*':liw*titr*rrlkl:3a:a{t:?.i!*-:}4.1,.1}tt:r'i:r-'.r::1.':.4.i' jni:ii1":i:r:::,':i..i:.'.,,,. '.. . . . st10:00 91 168 2Sg.t8!. ... :,,::,r..::ff]l]€=iilx*rt1iir.ji.._i...t.t..-.::t,.i,.ai!ji rr:i.r:r.r:....r..--.r..:r.i.,,.,..r:...,..i,,.,., as+12:00 PM 1,16 1X7 243eW- :.,r1 . i:.ir...i:I*t ,e:i3::tm..i..'j::t'.i ti.t !,.rt,:;::.:i.:..-:-, .&.02:00 g0 .tr5 22403rib..}rn.'].1,l1'.!mi;:i.::i:f::i::::::::':*}+,i...'......|:].].l.,1.::i:.1'ES EBF**-# #06:00 'tO4 141 245 08:00 81 51 10:00 tt * ' 70lqry . . , :r ',, ::l:ri::lx't r'arl!,t ri&lxt ti'i!r:'...t-.,:r:llr..i:i, . , .::,. ,, 5eTotal 2165 12:00 AM Percent PM Peak Vol. Percent ADT 234 16:00 172 186 17:OO 235 402 17:O0 386 462946.80/0 53.2% Not Calculated IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII AllTrafftc Datia Services, lnc. 9660 W44th Ave \Mreat Ridge, CO 80033 wwwalltrafficdata. net Page 1 CR335 WO JUNCTION INTERSECTION Site Code:2 roAM I 001:00 O O AI0200 0 { c0400 3 2 1906:00 13 6fi;oo is 40 25 ,ll:, ,...,...ll..:,,.,,.,,, .,,3$08:00 ' r,.;;,. 1 .j[,f'" ' *i:",", ,,-ii,i ) totro ro -- -n l8 ,r#* M.* ;*;x$**'';:..,'t.lrittlr.';ai:..'.ir':rii:r,'';i-, "i:i'-'i*::'"'r':r'' ' . ' & 77'-;iid . :-:5[*riwryN.-:sffix&xr;ra.1is-ii; :iti:l.i:i. i'r:at1..:'.":'i.1irf':..::,rjirrr:'1:rr '' 1: ':' '' ?'t8 lill]. ;,':: tw&re;1;Kgri::;l,lr":...,.,',,, E. ..-*, mro1'-t!;iln:'..]:..i=ii...::}*;.il:.''l,&;}'.:."j:::...''']:i.'i]".'''.i]:l.,.',=.,,l'l..:..loxro r" I ' 7 309 PelEellt 50.816 tlg.2ta 08l,0 vd. 17 lt 30 PfP.ak 12fi 16:00 16I)0ia rr tt =43m Percent ADT 50.8% NdGalqdabd 49.2% t I I I lr lr lr lr lr lr l: t: lr lr I' APPENDIX C Trqffic Growth Colculotion lnformotion Kmlq-Horn and Associates, lnc. 09603700A -The Rapids on the Colorado <=n Average DailY Traffic CountY Road SYstem 2002 TransportaUon Study Garfi eld CountY, Colorado Sorted by CountY Road Number t I I I ir lr lr lr lr lr l: l: lr lr l: Avenge Daily Traffic (ADT) County Road Name Number 69 Westbank Rd 83 Sunlight Peak Rd Catherine Storc Rd White Hill Rd 847 83 4t4 88 144 100 48,13 10{366 102 Missouri ttelshts 583 103 CrvstalSprings Rd 1373 {05 Cerise Rd 56 107 Red HillRd 250 .t08 Thomoson Greek Rd 1492 ,t09 Hardwick Bridse Rd 2031 1{0 Old Dump Rd 447 111 Prince Creek Rd 783 112 crwstal Snrinos iltn 459 113 Cottonwood Pass Rd 812 114 GIUIC Rd {979 {{5 Red Ganvon Rd 275 117 Four Mile Rd 2077 {{8 Mt Sopris Ranch Rd 132 119 KindallRd 17 120 Lookout Mountain Rd 40 121 Goulter Crcek Rd 39 122 Uoper Cattle Greek Rd 123 123 Marion Gemetry Rd l9 125 Drv Park Rd 211 126 Black Diamond Mine Rd {85 127 Three Mile Rd 427 129 No Name Ln 144 132 MitchellCreek Rd 197 133 lllle! Ray Rd 1577 134 South Canvon Grcek Rd 525 137 Canvon Crcek Rd 309 {38 Slauohterhouse Rd 63 140 Coffee Pot Rd 215 150 Sweetwater Lake Rd 267 151 Sweetwater Gow CamP Rd 51 153 Bio Four Rd 38 154 Old Hishway 82 2564 162 La Casita Rd 87 170 Panorama Dr 325 200 North Drv Fork Rd 71 201 Baxter Pass Rd 45 202 KimballGreek Rd 14 I I I I IT h h h h h l: l: h h 204 Roan Creek Dr 337 205 Salt Wash l3 206 Prairie Canvon Rd 1 207 Carr Creek Rd Brush Greek Rd Mile Pond Rd Glear Greek Rd Conn Creek Rd 16 209 27 210 820 211 {6 2,13 I 214 Peach Valley Rd 758 215 Parachute Creek Rd 919 216 AntonelliLn 193 217 Little Box Ganvon Rd 210 219 MIddte Rifle Creek 256 221 Green Ln 392 222 South Drv Fork Rd 72 223 Petercon Ln 991 225 AnUers Ln 242 226 Grass Vallev Rd 325 227 Miller Ln Prcfti Ln Ukele Ln First Street Silt Mesa Rd 931 228 196 229 356 231 942 233 898 235 Davis Point 307 236 Harness Ln 181 237 Ha:vey GaP Rd 908 238 Slauohter Gulch Rd 23 240 Bruce Rd 175 241 Elk Creek Rd 313 242 JOS Rd 84 243 Main Elk Rd 174 24 Fravert Reservoir Rd 317 245 Buford Rd 1464 246 AnvilPoints Rd 366 247 North Cutoff Rd 100 250 BendettiRd 312 251 North Hasse Ln 126 252 West Rifle Creek Rd 283 257 Mesa Dr {98 259 JewellLn 309 2594 259A 103 260 Tiopitt Ln 143 261A.lnqersoll Ln 137 261 Groff Ln 334 262 iiid-Vallev Ln 336 263 Wearc Ln 99 265 Prcfontaine Rd 95{ 266 Asgard Subdivision 119 286 Atchee Rd 5 291 Steohens Hill 283 293 North Graham Rd 1117 294 South Graham Rd 702 I T I tlll h h h l: l: I t: ll 296 Dokes Ln 87 297 Wittwer Ln 59 298 Smith DollGoal Mine Rd 7 300 Baftlement Plarry 2527 301 Morrisanla Mesa Rd 600 302 Undenrood Ln 82 306 Wallace Greek Rd ,l59 309 nulisonlParachute Rd 378 31{Divide Creek Rd 2249 312 Garfield Creek Rd 211 3{3 East Divide Crcek Rd 137 314 AlkaliGreek Rd 205 315 Mamm Greek Rd {300 316 Knuckles Greek Rd 49 317 Beaver Crcek Rd 104 3{9 West Mamm Greek Rd {341 320 Rifle-Rulison Rd {496 321 TauohenbauEh Mesa Rd 12E 322 Shaeffer Rd 414 323 Rulison Rd 699 324 Maxfield Rd Porcuoine Crcek {95 325 43 326 Chinoerfield Ln 150 327 Halls Gulch 212 329 Spruce Crcek 89 33r Dry Hollow Rd Ramsey Gulch Rd Hunter lllesa Rd 334 Colorado River Rd Jenkins Gutoff Fairview Rd Raven Rd West Divide Rd Airport Rd Garfield CountY AirPort Runwav Rd 1102 332 {58 333 220 334 27 335 2712 336 253 u2 267 343 56 g4 140 346 1344 352 t{39 3524 248 3574 Villaoe Dr 840 tls1 Panoramic Dr 129 455 Rainbow Dr 262 456 Odin Dr 140 T I I I ll lr h h l: li l: h Generation Designed by Checked by Trafftc Calculation Date Job No. Sheef No. Weekdav (paoe 367) Daily Weekday T=5.86*X T=5.86* 153.0 TRIP GENERATION MANUAL TECHNIQUES ITE Trio Generation Manual 7th Edition, Average Rate Equations Land Use Code - ResidentialCondominium/Townhouse (230) lndependant Variable - Dwelling Units (X) f,= 153 T = Average Vehicle Trip Ends DirectionalDistribution: 17o/o ent' 83o/o exit. T = 0.44 * X f = 67 Average Vehicle Trip Ends T = 0.44 " 153.0 11 entering 56 exiting 11+56=67 Peak Hour of Adlacent Street Trafflc. One Hour Between 4 ancl 6 p.m. (paqe 369) DirectionalDistribution: 670/o ent' 33o/o exit. T = 0.52 * X f = 80 Average Vehicle Trip Ends T = 0.52' 153.0 54 entering 26 exiting 54+26=80 Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 507o exiting J = S96 Average Vehicle TriP Ends 448 entering 448 exiting 448+448=896 APPENDIX D Trip Generotion Worksheet Kmley-Horn and Associates, lnc. 096037000 - The Rapids on the Colorado I I I IT lr lr lr lr I l: t: lr <=n I T I t lr lr lr lr lr lr l: lr t: t: ffi'ffitrru Kimley'Hornh-'ffif \ ardAssociatm,lnc, Project Subject The Tri Designed by Checked by Job No. Sheet No. TRIP GENERATION MANUAL TECHNIOUES ITE Trio Generation ManualTth Edition, Fifted Curve Equations Land Use Code - Single-Family Detached Housing (210) IndependantVariable - Dwelling Units (X) f,= 104 T = Average Vehicle Trip Ends Peak Hour of Adiacent Street Traffic. One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. (oaoe 270) Directional Distribution :25% ent. 75% exit. (T) = 0.Zo (X) + 9.43 (T) = 0.70. (104'0) + 9.43 f = 82 Average Vehicle Trip Ends 21 entering 62 exiting 21+61=82 Peak Hour of Adiacent Street Traffic. One Hour Between 4 and 6 n.m. (paoe 271) DirectionalDistribution: 63% ent. 37o/o f = 111 Average Vehicle TriP Ends 70 entering 41 exiting 70+41=111 exit. Ln(T) = o.9o Ln(X) + 0.53 Ln(T)=Q.96* Ln(104.0) + 0.53 Weekdav (oaqe 269) Daily Weekday Ln(T) = 0.92 Ln(X) + 2.71 Ln(T)=Q.92* Ln(104.0) + 2.71 Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting J = '1078 Average Vehicle Trip Ends 539 entering 539 exiting 539+539=1078 I I I I lr lr lr lr lr lr t: l: t: I' APPENDIX E HCS lnlersection Anolysis Worksheets Kimley-Horn anil Associates, lnc. 096037N0 - The Rapids on the Colorailo <=n Page I of2Two-Way Stop ControlI I I I ll lr lr lr lr lr l: t: lr lr l: TWO.WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst GDR Agency/Co. KmleY-Horn Date Performed 8/3/2006 Analysis Time Period Existing AM Peak lntersection l-70 wB RamP at New Cast/e Jurisdiction Garfield CountY Analysis Year 2006 rroiect Description The Rapids on the Colopclg_ jasUWest Street: l-70 WB RamP tlorth/South Street: Bruce ntersection Orientation: North-South Studv Period (hrs): 0.25 Illaior Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R y'olume 16 122 0 0 444 42 ?eak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.80 0.82 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.88 Hourlv Flow Rate, HFR 19 148 0 0 522 47 Percent Heavy Vehicles 5 0 Vledian Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 I 0 Configuration LT rR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 I 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R y'olume 21 0 65 0 0 o )eak-Hour Factor. PHF 0.88 0.85 0.77 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourlv Flow Rate. HFR 23 0 84 0 0 0 Percent Heaw Vehicles 5 5 5 0 0 0 >ercent Grade (%)0 0 :lared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 0 0 Configuration LTR Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Vlovement 1 4 7 I 9 10 11 12 -ane Configuration LT LTR r (vph)19 107 (m) (vph)989 689 vlc 0.02 0.16 )5olo Queue length 0.06 0.55 SontrolDelay 8.7 11.2 -os A B Approach Delay 11.2 Approach LOS B Rights Reserved file://C:\Documents and Settings\curtis.rowe\Local Settings\Temp\u2klBC.tmp 8t4t2006 Page I of2Two-Way Stop ControlI I I T tl lr lr lr lr lr l: t: lr t: l: TWO.WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst CDR Agency/Co. KmleY-Horn Date Performed 8/3/2006 Analysis Time Period Existing PM Peak lntersection l-70 WB Ramp at New Cast/e Jurisdiction Garfield CountY Analysis Year 2006 Proiect Descriotion The Rapids on the Colorado last/West Street: l-70 WB RamP North/SouthStreet Bruce ntersection Orientation: North-Soufh Studv Period (hrs): 0.25 l/laior Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R y'olume 51 123 0 0 241 108 Peak-Hour Factor. PHF 0.91 0.77 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.87 Hourlv Flow Rate, HFR 56 159 0 0 259 124 rercent Heaw Vehicles 5 0 Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 I 0 ]onfiguration LT TR Jostream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 I 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 96 1 431 o 0 o Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.86 0.25 0.81 0.93 0.93 0.93 {ourly Flow Rate, HFR 111 4 532 0 o 0 Percent Heaw Vehicles 5 5 5 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%)0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 -anes 0 1 0 0 0 0 3onfiouration LTR Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Vlovement I 4 7 I I 10 11 12 -ane Configuration LT LTR r (vph)56 647 (m) (vph)1159 745 vlc 0.05 0.87 95o/o Queue length 0.15 10.61 ControlDelay 8.3 32.8 _os A D Approach Delay 32.8 Aoproach LOS D Rights Reserved file://C:\Documents and Settings\curtis.rowe\Local Settings\Temp\u2klCl.tmp 81412006 Page 1 of2Two-Way Stop ControlI I I I t lr lr lr l: l: l: lr lr I' rwo.uiNV STOP CONTROL SUMMARY l-70 WB Ramp at New Cast/erisdiction Gartieb CountY Analyst CDR Agency/Co. KmleY-Horn Date Performed 8/3/2006 Time Period Background AM Peak The Raoids on the Colorado Undivided Rights Reserved file://C:\Documents and Settings\curtis.rowe\Local Settings\Temp\u2klC6'tmp 8t4t2A06 Page I of2Two-Way Stop ControlI I I I I lr lr lr lr lr t: l: lr lr lr l: TWO.WAY STOP GONTROL SUMMARY ffi\vrliI \nalyst CDR Agency/Co. KmleY-Horn Date Performed 8/3/2006 Analysis Time Period Background PM Peak ntersection l-70 WB Ramp at New Casf/e Jurisdiction Gaiield CountY Analysis Year 2008 rroiect Description The Rapids on the Colorado iastMest Street l-70 WB RamP tlorth/South Street: Bruce lntersection Orientation: North-South Studv Period (hrs): 0.25 Maior Street Northbound Southbound Vlovement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R y'olume 69 165 0 0 266 115 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.91 0.77 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.87 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 75 214 0 0 286 132 Percent Heavy Vehicles 5 0 Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 tanes 0 I 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT rR Uostream Siqnal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Mlovement 7 8 I 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 140 o 457 o 0 o :eak-Hour Factor. PHF 0.86 0.25 0.81 0.93 0.93 0.93 ilourlv Flow Rate, HFR 162 0 5U 0 o 0 Percent Heaw Vehicles 5 5 5 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%)0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 lT Channelized 0 0 _anes 0 1 0 0 0 0 3onfiouration LTR Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 I 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LTR v (vph)75 726 (m) (vph)1125 641 ilc 0.07 1.13 )5olo Queue length 0.21 22.65 ControlDelay 8.4 101.7 OS A F \pproach Delay 101.7 \pproach LOS F Rights Reserved file://C:\Documents and Settings\curtis.rowe\Local Settings\Temp\u2klCD.tnp 8t4t2006 Page 1 of 1 Version 4. ld Two-Way Stop Control ncszoofM Copyright @ 2003 University ofFlorida, All Rights Reserved t I t T lr lr lr lr l: l: l: lr TWO.WAY STOP GONTROL SUMMARY \nalyst CDR \gency/Co. KmleY-Horn Date Performed 8/3/2006 Anatysis Time Period lacheround AM Peak - lntersection l-70 WB Ramp at New Cast/e Jurisdiction Gartied CountY Analysis Year 2008 Proiect Description The Rapids on the Colorado EastMest Street: l-70 WB RamP tlorth/South Street Bruce ntersection Orientation: North-South Studv Period (hrs): 0.25 Maior Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 b L T R L T R y'olume 29 152 0 0 480 45 reak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.80 0.82 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.88 Hourlv Flow Rate. HFR 36 185 0 0 564 51 Percent Heaw Vehicles 5 0 \4edian Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 -anes 0 I 0 0 1 0 3onfiguration LT TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound [Iovement 7 I I 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 31 o 69 o 0 0 reak-Hour Factor. PHF 0.88 0.85 0.77 0.85 0.85 0.85 lourlv Flow Rate, HFR 35 0 89 o 0 0 rercent Heaw Vehicles 5 5 5 0 0 0 rerc,ent Grade (o/o)o 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 1 0 0 0 ]onflquration LT R \pproach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 o 10 'l'l 12 Lane Configuration LT LT R v (vph)36 35 89 (m) (vph)950 316 850 ilc 0.04 0.11 0.10 )5% queue length 0.12 0.37 0.35 3ontrolDelay 8.9 17.8 9.7 _os A c A Approach Delay 12.0 Approach LOS B file://C:\Documents and Settings\curtis.rowe\Local Settings\Temp\u2klD2.tmp 8t412006 Page 1 of2Two-Way Stop ControlI I I T lr lr lr lr lr lr l: l: lr lr ll TWO.WAY STOP GONTROL SUMMARY Analyst CDRAgency/Co. KmleY-Horn Date Performed 8/3/2006 Analysis Time Period lackoround PM Peak - lntersection l-70 WB Ramp at New Cast/e Jurisdiction Gaffield CountY Analysis Year 2008 )roiect Descriotion The Rapids on the Colorado iastANest Street: l-70 WB RamP tlorth/SouthStreet: Bruce lntersection Orientation: Notlh-South Studv Period (hrs : 0.25 Maior Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 69 165 0 0 266 115 Peak-Hour Factor. PHF 0.91 0.77 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.87 Hourlv Flow Rate, HFR 75 214 0 0 286 132 rercent Heaw Vehicles 5 0 Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 [anes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Confiquration LT rR Jpstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 I I 10 11 12 L T R L T R y'olume 140 0 457 o 0 0 )eak-Hour Factor. PHF 0.86 0.25 0.81 0.93 0.93 0.93 Hourlv Flow Rate. HFR 162 0 564 0 0 0 Percent Heaw Vehicles 5 5 5 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%)0 0 :lared Approach N N 3torage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 -anes 0 1 1 0 0 0 Sonfisuration LT R Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 I 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LT R r (vph)75 162 564 3 (m) (vph)1125 366 818 ilc 0.07 0.44 0.69 ]5% queue length 0.21 2.19 5.65 SontrolDelay 8.4 22.4 18.6 OS A c c Approach Delay 19.4 \pproach LOS c Rights Reserved fi1e://C:\Documents and Settings\curtis.rowe\Local Settings\Temp\u2klD7.tmp 8t4t2006 Rights Reserved ttcszodM Version 4. ld I I I t lr lr lr lr lr l: lr TWO.WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY fril,ffiffi ffi:lirll i=i,i,i;ti;,'ffi Analyst CDR Agency/Co. KmleY-Horn Date Performed 8/3/2006 Analysis Time Period TotalAM Peak - lmp ntersection l-70 WB Ramp at New Casf/e Jurisdiction Gartied CountY Analysis Year 2008 )roiect Description The Rapids on the Colorado EastMest Street: l-70 WB RamP tlorth/South Street: Bruce lntersection Orientation: North'South Studv Period (hrs): 0.25 Maior Street Northbound Southbound Mlovement I 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 35 158 0 0 482 45 reak-Hour Factor. PHF 0.80 0.82 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.88 {ourly Flow Rate, HFR 43 192 0 0 567 51 Percent Heavy Vehicles 5 0 [/edian Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 o 1 0 Confiquration LT rR Jpstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 I 10 11 12 L T R L T R Uolume 45 0 69 0 0 0 Peak-Hour Factor. PHF 0.88 0.85 0.77 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourlv Flow Rate, HFR 51 0 89 0 0 0 Percent Heaw Vehicles 5 5 5 0 o o )ercent Grade (%)0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 -anes 0 1 1 0 0 0 Sonfiguration LT R Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 I 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LT R v (vph)43 51 89 ] (m) (vph)948 304 842 'tlc 0.05 0.17 0.11 35% queue length 0.14 0.59 0.35 ControlDelay 9.0 19.2 9.8 OS A c A \pproach Delay 13.2 \pproach LOS B Copyright @ 2003 University ofFlorida, All Rights Reserved Version 4. ld Rights Reserved ucszoofM Version 4.Id I I I I lr lr lr lr l: t: t: lr TWO.WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY ffisliilffi,$ft HftM&4,1.ffi.S #, il-a,. ffi \nalyst CDR Agency/Co. KmleY-Horn Date Performed 8/3/2006 Analysis Time Period TotalPM Peak - lmp lntersection l-70 WB Ramp at New Castle Jurisdiction Gartield CountY Analysis Year 2008 Proiect Description The Rapids on the Colorado lastANest Street: l-70 WB RamP tlorth/South Street: Bruce ntersection Orientation: North-South Studv Period (hrs): 0.25 Maior Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R y'olume 73 169 0 0 273 115 Peak-Hour Factor. PHF 0.91 0.77 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.87 Hourlv Flow Rate, HFR 80 219 0 0 293 132 Percent Heaw Vehicles 5 0 Vledian Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 _anes 0 1 0 0 1 0 3onfiouration LT rR Upstream Signal 0 o Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 I I 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 186 0 457 0 0 0 >eak-Hour Factor. PHF 0.86 0.25 0.81 0.93 0.93 0.93 {ourlv Flow Rate. HFR 216 0 564 0 0 0 )ercent HeaW Vehicles 5 5 5 o 0 0 rercent Grade (o/o)0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 I 1 0 0 0 Sonflguration LT R \pproach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 o 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LT R u (vph)8A 216 564 (m) (vph)1118 354 813 rlc 0.07 0.61 0.69 )5olo Queue length 0.23 3.84 5.74 SontrolDelay 8.5 29.9 18.8 -os A D c Approach Delay 21.9 Approach LOS c Copyright @ 2003 University ofFlorida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.ld Page 1 of 1 Version 4. ld Two-Way Stop Control HCS20WNI Copyright @ 2003 University ofFlorid4 All Righs Reserved t I I I lr lr lr lr lr lr l: l: li lr ll TWO.WAY STOP GONTROL SUMMARY Analyst CDR Agency/Co. KmleY-Horn Date Performed 8/4/2006 Analysis Time Period Existing AM Peak lntersection l-70 EB Ramp at New Casf/eJurisdiction Gartied CountY Analysis Year 2006 Proiect Descriotion The Rapids on the Colorado EastMest Street: l-70 EB RamP tlorth/SouthStreet: Bruce ntersection Orientation: Notth-South Studv Period (hrs l: 0.25 Maior Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R y'olume 0 89 133 426 46 0 reak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.80 0.86 0.71 0.86 0.68 0.88 Hourlv Flow Rate, HFR 0 103 187 495 67 0 Percent Heaw Vehicles 5 0 Mledian Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 _anes 0 I 0 0 1 0 ]onfiguration IR LT Jpstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Vlovement 7 I 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R y'olume 0 0 0 66 0 49 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.85 0.77 0.79 1.00 0.72 Hourlv Flow Rate. HFR o 0 0 83 0 68 Percent Heaw Vehicles 5 5 5 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%)0 0 :lared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 _anes 0 0 0 0 1 0 3onfiguration LTR Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound lVlovement 1 4 7 I 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LTR u (vph)495 151 C (m) (vph)1283 196 vlc 0.39 0.77 )5% queue length 1.85 5.22 3ontrolDelay 9.6 66.8 -os A F \pproach Delay 66.8 Aoproach LOS F file://C:\Documents and Settings\curtis.rowe\Local Settings\Temp\u2k1BA.tmp 81412406 Page 1 ofl Version 4.ld Two-Way Stop Control ucszoofM Copyright @ 2003 University ofFlorid4 All Rights Reserved t I I I ll lr lr lr lr lr l: lr TWO.WAY STOP GONTROL SUMMARY ffiffiffii Analyst CDRAgency/Co. Kmley-Horn Date Ferformed B/4/2006 Analysis Time Period Existing PM Peak lntersection l-70 EB Ramp at New Cast/e Jurisdiction Gaffield CountY Analysis Year 2006 Proiect Description The Rapids on the Colorado East/West Street: l-70 EB Ramp [orth/SouthStreet: Bruce lntersection Orientation: North-South Studv Period (hrs): 0.25 Maior Street Northbound Southbound Vovement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R y'olume 0 158 44 148 169 0 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.80 0.76 0.92 0.82 0.86 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 207 47 180 196 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 5 0 Median Tvpe Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 -anes 0 1 0 0 1 0 3onfiquration TR LT Uostream Sional 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound \Iovement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R y'olume o 0 0 55 0 47 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.85 0.77 0.72 1.00 0.78 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 76 0 60 Percent Heaw Vehicles 5 5 5 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%)0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 -anes 0 0 0 0 1 0 3onfiguration LTR Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement ,l 4 7 8 I 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LTR u (vph)180 136 I (m) (vph)1323 435 tlc 0.14 0.31 )5% queue lenqth 0.47 1.32 SontrolDelay 8.1 17.0 _os A c \pproach Delay 17.0 \poroach LOS c file://C:\Documents and Settings\curtis.rowe\Loca1 Settings\Temp\u2klBA.tmp 8t4t2006 Page 1 of I Version 4.ld Two-Way Stop Control ncszoodM Copyright @ 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved I I I I lr lr lr lr lr lr l: t: lr TWO.WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst CDRAgency/Co. Kmley-Horn Date Performed 8/4/2006 Analysis Time Period Background AM Peak lntersection l-70 EB Ramp at New Casf/eJurisdiction Garfield CountY Analysis Year 2008 Proiect Descriotion The Rapids on the Colorado fastANest Street: l-70 EB Ramp tlorth/South Street: Bruce ntersection Orientation: Notth-South Studv Period (hrs): 0.25 Maior Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R y'olume 0 111 180 452 59 0 ,eak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 123 200 502 65 0 Percent Heaw Vehicles 5 o [rledian Type Undivided lT Channelized 0 0 -anes 0 1 0 0 1 0 ]onfiguration TR LT .Jpstream Signal 0 0 Mlnor Street Westbound Eastbound Vtovement 7 I I 10 11 12 L T R L T R y'olume 0 0 o 70 0 53 Peak-Hour Factor. PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourlv Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 77 0 58 )ercent Heaw Vehicles 5 5 5 0 0 0 )ercent Grade (%)0 o =lared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 tanes 0 0 0 0 1 0 Confiquration LTR Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 I 10 1',|12 -ane Configuration LT LTR r (vph)502 135 3 (m) (vph)1248 177 ilc 0.40 0.76 )5% queue length 1.98 4.96 3ontrolDelay 9.8 71.1 LOS A F Approach Delay 71.1 \pproach LOS F file://C:\Documents and Settings\curtis.rowe\Local Settings\Temp\u2k1EE.tmp 81412006 Page 1 of 1 Version 4. ld Two-Way Stop Control ncszoofM Copyright @ 2003 University ofFlorida, All Righs Reserved T I I T I T lr lr lr lr lr l: l: li lr TWO.WAY STOP GONTROL SUMMARY \nalyst CDRAgency/Co. Kmley-Horn Date Performed 8/4/2006 Analysis Time Period Background PM Peak lntersection l-70 EB Ramp at New Casf/eJurisdiction Garfield County Analysis Year 2008 Proiect Descriotion The Rapids on the Colorado EastMest Street l-70 EB Ramp North/SouthStreet: Bruce ntersection Orientation: North-South Studv Period (hrs): 0.25 Maior Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R y'olume 0 176 65 166 240 0 Peak-Hour Factor. PHF 4.80 0.76 0.92 0.82 0.86 0.88 {ourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 231 70 202 279 0 eercent Heaw Vehicles 5 0 Vledian Tvpe Undivided 1T Channelized 0 0 -anes 0 1 0 0 1 0 3onfiouration TR LT Uostream Sional 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R y'olume o 0 o 58 0 55 reak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.85 0.77 0.72 1.00 0.78 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 o 0 80 0 70 Percent Heaw Vehicles 5 5 5 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%)0 0 Flared Approach N N itorage 0 0 1T Channelized 0 o -anes 0 0 0 0 1 0 ]onfiquration LTR \pproach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 -ane Configuration LT LTR r (vph)202 150 3 (m) (vph)1272 359 ilc 0.16 0.42 )5% queue length 0.56 2.00 OontrolDelay 8.4 22.0 ros A c Approach Delay 22.0 Aporoach LOS c file://C:\Documents and Settings\curtis.rowe\Local Settings\Temp\u2klBA.tmp 8/4/2006 Rights Reserved _ ncszs@! Version 4.Id I I t I lr lr lr lr t: l: l: lr l, TWO.WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY ,ll ffi tdli'i{'r=efi lgffi:rNlfliiffi+iijMfrffrffi ;#ffi ffiffi,ti Analyst CDR Agency/Co. KmleY-Horn Date Performed B/4/2006 Analysis Time Period TotalAM Peak lntersection l-70 EB Ramp at New Cast/e Jurisdiction Garfield CountY Analysis Year 2008 De The on the Colorado EastANest Street: l-70 EB th Street:Bruce lntersection Orientation: North-South Period 0.25 iltlaior Street Northbound Southbound l\4ovement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 0 123 220 452 75 0 >eak-Hour Factor. PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 rlourlv Flow Rate, HFR 0 136 244 502 83 0 Percent Heaw Vehicles 5 0 Mledian Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 -anes 0 1 0 0 1 0 ]onfiguration rR LT Jostream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 I 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 0 0 0 70 0 55 Peak-Hour Factor. PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 {ourlv Flow Rate. HFR 0 0 0 77 0 61 >ercent Heaw Vehicles 5 5 5 0 0 o rercent Grade (o/o)0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 I 0 Configuration LTR Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Mlovement 1 4 7 I 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LTR v (vph)502 138 ] (m) (vph)1190 163 tlc 0.42 0.85 )5% queue length 2.14 5.80 3ontrolDelay 10.2 90.6 OS B F Approach Delay 90.6 Aooroach LOS F Copyrighl @ 2003 University of Florida, All Righa Rcserved Venion 4.ld I I T I lr lr lr lr lr lr l: t: lr lr I' TWO.WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY ffi-teHffiMfffi :]%-,,i ffiBqi*i i,ii#il*P;l iffi Analyst CDRAgency/Co. Kimley-Horn Date Performed 8/4/2006 Analysis Time Period TotalPM Peak lntersection l-70 EB Ramp at New Cast/eJurisdiction Gaffield CountY Analysis Year 2008 )roiect Description The Rapids on the Colorado East/West Street: l-70 EB Ramp \orth/South Street: Bruce lntersection Orientation: Notlh-South Studv Period (hrs): 0.25 Maior Street Northbound Southbound \4ovement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R y'olume 0 184 92 166 293 0 )eak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.80 0.76 0.92 0.82 0.86 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 242 99 202 340 0 Percent Heaw Vehicles 5 0 Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 -anes 0 I 0 0 1 0 3onfiguration IR LT Uostream Sional 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 I I 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 0 0 0 58 0 62 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.85 0.77 0.72 1.00 0.78 Hourlv Flow Rate. HFR 0 0 0 80 0 79 Percent Heaw Vehicles 5 5 5 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%)0 0 =lared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 [anes 0 0 0 0 I 0 Configuration LTR Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 I 9 10 11 '12 -ane Configuration LT LTR r (vph)202 159 3 (m) (vph)1229 330 ilc 0.16 0.48 )5% queue length 0.59 2.50 OontrolDelay 8.5 25.6 OS A D Approach Delay 25.6 Aoproach LOS D ucszoooru Copyright @ 2003 University ofFlorida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d I I I I T Ir lr lr lr lr l: l: lr lr lr l: ALL.WAY STOP CONTROL ANALYSIS il$.eqffi 'e"fi b$$l$Wl*,t$'t;.":rr,+W!itllili'-t?;.=-,.Vffi ffi *tiEn:ril;@,[ie#ii.,'w.]]N[ r{ ffi+;,'ui ffi] Analyst CDR Agency/Co. KmleY-Horn Date Performed 10/5/2006 Analysis Time Period Existing AM Peak lntersection l-70 EB Ramp at New Castle Jurisdiction Garfield CountY Analysis Year 2006 Proiect lD The Rapids on the Colorado EastMest Street: l-70 EB RamP lNortnlsouth Street: Eruce \Doroach Eastbound Westbound \rlovemenl L T R L T R y'olume 66 0 49 0 0 0 '}/oThrus Left Lane 50 50 qDoroach Northbound Southbound ulovemenl L T R L T R /olume 0 89 133 426 46 0 |roThrus Left Lane 50 50 Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 lonftguration LTR TR LT )HF 0.90 0.90 0.90 :low Rate 127 245 524 ,/o Heaw Vehicles 5 5 5 No. Lanes I 0 1 I Geometry Group I 1 1 Duration, T 0.25 )rop. Lefi-Tums 0.6 0.0 0.9 'rop. Right-Tums 0.4 0.6 0.0 )rop. Heavy Vehicle lLT-adj 0.2 0.2 o.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 fiT-adj -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 4.6 rHV-adj 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 ndi, omputed 5.67 5.67 5.67 d, initial value 3.20 3.20 s.20 <. initial 0.11 0.22 0.47 td. final value 5.67 5.67 5.67 <. final value 0.20 0.32 0.71 Vlove-uo time, m 2.0 2.0 2.0 Service Time 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 LI L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 3apacity 377 495 734 Delay 10.08 9.81 18.61 LOS B A c \pproach: Delay 10.08 9.81 18.61 LOS B A c ntersection Delay 15.04- ntersection LOS B ncszoofM Copyright @ 2003 University ofFlorida, All Rights Reserved Version 4. ld I I I I I ir lr lr lr lr lr lr lr lr lr lr lr ALL.WAY STOP CONTROL ANALYSIS ffi H$}B t?ffi$#ftiiifl# lii*sfr L(\k!ffi,ffififfi$ Analyst CDR Agency/Co. KmleY-Horn Date Performed 10/il2006 Analysis Time Period Existing PM Peak lntersection l-70 EB Ramp at New Castle Jurisdiction Gafield CountY Analysis Year 2006 )roiect lD The Rapids on the Colorado :astMest Street: l-70 EB Ramp tlorth/South Street: Bruce \oDroach Eastbound Weshound \Iovement L T R L T R y'olume 55 0 47 0 0 0 '/oThrus Left Lane 50 50 \DDroach Northbound Southbound Movement L T R L T R Yolume 0 58 44 148 169 0 /oThrus Left Lane 50 50 Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 t2 L1 a L,I L2 )onliguration LTR TR LT ]HF 0.85 0.85 0.85 :low Rate 119 236 372 '/o Heaw Vehicles 5 5 5 {o. Lanes 1 0 1 I 3eometry Group 1 1 I )uration, T 0.25 )rop. Left-Tums 0.5 0.0 0.5 )rop. Right-Tums 0.5 0.2 0.0 )rop. Heavy Vehicle rLT-adj 0.2 0.2 0.2 o.2 0.2 0.2 rRT-adj -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 nHV-adj 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 hadj, computed 5.24 5.24 5.24 td. initial value 3.20 3.20 3.20 <. initial 0.11 0.21 0.33 rd. final value 5.24 5.24 5.24 <, final value 0.17 0.30 0.48 Move-up time. m 2.0 2.0 2.0 Service Time 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 t2 L1 t2 L1 L2 )apacity 369 486 622 )elay 9.33 9.64 12.03 _os A A B \pproach: Delay 9.33 9.64 12.03 LOS A A B ntersection Delay 10.81 ntersection LOS l B ucszoooN Copyright @ 2003 University ofFtorida, All Rights Reserved Vemion 4.ld I t I t t lr lr lr lr lr l: l: ll lr t: ALL.WAY STOP GONTROL ANALYSIS Analyst CDR Agency/Co. KmleY-Horn Date Performed 10/5/2006 Analysis Time Period Background AM Peak lntersection l-70 EB Ramp at New Castle Jurisdiction Gartield CountY Analysis Year 2008 Proiect lD The Rapids on the Colorado iastMest Slreel: l-70 EB RamP tlorth/SouthStreet: Bruce \ooroach Eastbound Westbound \rovement L T R L T R y'olume 70 0 53 0 0 0 /oThrus Left Lane 50 50 \Doroach Northbound Southbound Uovement L T R L T R y'olume 0 111 180 452 59 0 )6Thrus Left Lane 50 50 Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 w L1 l2 LI w L'l L2 3onfiguration LTR TR LT )HF 0.90 0.90 0.90 :lour Rate 135 323 567 )6 Heavy Vehicles 5 5 5 {o. Lanes 1 0 1 I Seometry Group 1 1 1 )uratlon, T 0.2 5 )rop. Left-Tums 0.6 0.0 0.9 )rop. Right-Tums 0.4 0.6 0.0 >rop. Heavy Vehicle [T-adj 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 lRT-adj -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 fiV-adj 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 mdj, computed 5.96 5.96 5.96 hd. initial value 3.20 3.20 3.20 r. inital 0.12 0.29 0.50 d. ffnal value 5.96 5.96 5.96 <. final value 0.22 0.43 0.79 Vlove-uo time. m 2.0 2.0 2.0 Serv'rce Time 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 12 L1 L2 L1 t2 )apacity 385 573 713 )elay 10.67 11.31 23.87 -os B B c \pprcach: Delay 10.67 11.31 23.87 LOS B B c ntersection Delay 18.I ntersection LOS c ucszMN Copyright @ 2003 University ofFlorida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.ld I I I I lr lr lr lr l: l: I l: t: ALL.WAY STOP GONTROL ANALYSIS HIS}E I ;{1friffi.{li-€rllij iffiill[]is4 ,RlffiXiffiJffi fiSffffi ii ir#1l,€ti.i iiir,ffiSffi*iffiiffi Analyst CDR Agency/Co. KmleY'Horn Date Performed 10/5/2006 Analysis Time Period Backgrcund PM Peak lntersection l-70 EB Ramp at New Castle Jurisdiction Gafield CountY Analysis Year 2008 )roiect lD The Raoids on the Colorado =astMest Street: l-70 EB Ramp {orth/South Street: Bruce Aooroach Eastbound Westbound Movement L T R L T R y'olume 58 0 55 0 0 0 /oThrus Left Lane 50 50 \Doroach Northbound Southbound \rovement L T R L T R r'olume 0 176 65 166 240 0 /oThrus Left Lane 50 50 Eastbound Wes$ound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L,I L2 L1 t2 L1 L2 )onfiguration LTR rR LT )HF 0.85 0.85 0.85 :low Rate 132 283 477 [o Heavy Vehicles 5 5 5 {o. Lanes I 0 1 I Seomety Group 1 1 1 )uration, T 0.25 )rop. Left-Tums 0.5 0.0 0.4 rrop. Right-Tums 0.5 0.3 0.0 )rop. Heavy Vehicle rLT-adj 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 nRT-adj -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 4.6 HV-adj 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 udj, computed 5.60 5.60 5.60 d, initial value 3.20 3.20 3.20 <, initial 0.12 0.25 0.42 rd. final value 5.60 5.60 5.60 (, final value 0.21 0.38 0.a4 Vlove-uo time. m 2.0 2.0 2.0 Service Time 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6 Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 )apacity 382 533 727 )elay 10.04 10.71 15.91 _os B B c \pproach: Delay 10.04 10.71 15.91 LOS B B c ntersection Delay 13.39 ntersection LOS B acszoofM Copyright @ 2003 University ofFlorida, All Rights Reserved Version 4. ld I I I I T T lr lr lr lr lr lr lrll lr lr lr ALL.WAY STOP CONTROL ANALYSIS ffi{i.it#l$Jfr iii+liii1N$\Blliliitifr,,ffiW{iii"+..NWffiffiUffilill: Analyst CDR Agency/Co. Kmley-Horn Date Performed 10/il2006 Analysis Time Period Total AM Peak lntersection l-70 EB Ramp at New Castle Jurisdiction Garfield CountY Analysis Year 2008 )roiect lD The Raoids on the Colorado iasUWest Steet: l-70 EB Ramp lNorthlsouttr Street: Bruce ADDroach Eastbound Westbound ulovement L T R L T R /olume 70 0 55 0 0 0 /oThrus Left Lane 50 50 \DDroach Northbound Southbound Vlovement L T R L T R y'olume 0 123 220 452 75 0 %Thrus Left Lane 50 50 Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 t2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Sonfiguraffon LTR TR LT PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 Flow Rate 138 380 585 % Heavy Vehicles 5 5 5 {o. Lanes 1 0 I 1 3eometry Group 1 1 I )uration. T 0.25 >rop. Left-Tums 0.6 0.0 0.9 'rop. Right-Tums 0.4 0.6 0.0 )rop. Heavy Vehicle 1LT-adj 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 rRT-adj -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 4.6 fiV-adj 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 Edj, computed 6.13 6.13 6.13 d, initial value 3.20 3.20 3.20 r, initial 0.12 0.34 0.52 td. final value 6.13 6.13 6.13 <. final value 0.24 0.51 0.83 Vlove-up time, m 2.0 2.0 2.0 Service Time 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 a L1 L2 Sapacity 388 630 701 Delay 11.01 12.73 27.63 LOS B B D Approach: Delay 11.01 12.73 27.63 LOS B B D ntersection Delay 20.42 ntersection LOS c acszoooN Copyright @ 2003 University of Florida All Rights Reserved Version 4. ld I I I T T I t T I I I I I I T I I t I ALL.WAY STOP CONTROL ANALYSIS ffi S"" ffiP e{, :r rry, ;;H#m?tir(iilili.$,rN Sii#irlffir&ioir-a#$T:T .@sxe di Analyst CDR Agency/Co. Kmley-Horn Date Performed 10/5/2006 Analysis Time Period Total PM Peak lntersection l-70 EB Ramp al New Casf/e Jurisdiction Gafield County Analysis Year 2008 )roiect lD The Raoids on the Colorado :ast/West Street: l-70 EB Ramp lNorth/South Street: Bruce qDDroach Eastbound Westbound Vovement L T R L T R y'olume 58 0 62 0 0 0 '/oThrus Left Lane 50 50 \ooroach Northbound Southbound Movement L T R L T R y'olume 0 184 92 166 293 0 '/oThrus Left Lane 50 50 Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 t2 L1 L2 3onfiguration LTR rR LT PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 Flow Rate 140 324 539 7o Heaw Vehicles 5 5 5 No. Lanes I 0 I 1 ieornstry Group 1 1 1 )uration. T 0.25 )rop. Left-Tums 0.5 0.0 0.4 Prop. Right-Tums 0.5 0.3 0.0 ,rop. Heavy Vehicle rLT-adj 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 rRT-adj -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 rHV-adj 1.7 1.7 1-7 1.7 1.7 1.7 radj, computed 5.83 5.83 5.83 rd, initial value 3.20 3.20 3.20 <, initial 0.12 0.29 0.48 rd, final value 5.83 5.83 5.83 <. final value 0.23 0.44 0.74 Vlove-up time, m 2.0 2.0 2.0 SeMce Time 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8 Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 )apacity 390 574 724 )elay 10.53 11.74 20.29 -os B B c \pproach: Delay 10.53 11.74 20.29 LOS B B c ntersection Delay 16.16 ntersection LOS c Copyright @ 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.!dHCS200fiM t I I I t t I t t I I t t I I t I I I TWO.WAY STOP GONTROL SUMMARY Analyst CDR Agency/Co. Kmley-Horn Date Performed 8/4/2006 Analysis Time Period TotalAM Peak lntersection CR-335 & Paddle Wheel Drive Jurisdiction Garfield County Analysis Year 2008 Proiect Descriotion The Rapids on the Colorado EastMestStreet: CR-335 North/South Street: Paddle WheelLane A) lntersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Maior Street Eastbound Westbound Movement ,|2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h)2 19 0 0 17 I Peak-hour factor. PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.88 0.85 0.77 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h)2 22 0 0 19 10 Proportion of heavy vehicles, Pru 0 5 Median tvoe Undivided RT Channelized?0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 1 Configuration LT T R Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 I 10 11 '|.2 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h)o o 0 21 o 6 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.80 0.82 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h)0 0 0 24 0 6 Proportion of heavy vehicles, P*5 5 0 0 5 5 Percent grade (%)0 0 Flared aporoach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized?0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Mlovement 1 4 7 8 I 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT tR Volume, v (vph)2 30 Oapacig, c, (vph).1597 984 r/c ratio 0.00 0.03 Queue length (95%)0.00 0.09 3ontrol Delay (s/veh)7.3 8.8 -os A A \pproach delay ls/veh)8.8 \pproach LOS A ucszoofu Copyright @ 2003 University ofFlorida All Rights Reserved Version 4.ld T I I I T t I I I t T T T t I I I T I TWO.WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY l;--B-nail.:;-.: -a, :1 r r ,F'?I ffiffi*6q*1i#i)ie[nIffi Analyst CDR Agency/Co. Kmley-Horn Date Performed 8/4/2006 Analysis Time Period TotalPM Peak lntersection CR-335 & Paddle Wheel Drive Jurisdiction Garfield County Analysis Year 2008 f,roiect Descriotion The Rapids on the Colorado EastAffest Street: CR-335 North/South Street: Paddle Wheel Lane (A) lntersection Orientation: Easf-Wesf Studv Period (hrs): 0.25 Maior Street Eastbound Westbound [rtovement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R y'olume (veh/h)7 11 0 0 18 25 >eak-hour factor. PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.88 0.85 0.77 {ourly Flow Rate veh/h)I 12 0 0 21 32 )roportion of heavy rehicles, P*0 5 Vledian type Undivided iT Channelized?0 0 -anes 0 1 0 a 1 1 Sonfiquration LT T R .Jostream Sional 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 I I 10 11 'i.2 L T R L T R y'olume (veh/h)0 0 o 14 o 4 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.80 0.82 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate tveh/h)0 0 0 16 0 4 Proportion of heavy rehicles, P*5 5 0 0 5 5 Percent grade (%)0 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized?0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 I 9 10 11 12 Lane Confiquration LT tR Volume, v (vph)I 20 Capacity, c, (vph)1566 976 v/c ratio 4.01 0.02 Queue length (95o/o)0.02 0.06 Control Delay (s/veh)7.3 8.8 LOS A A Approach delay (s/veh)8.8 Approach LOS A ucszoooru Copyright @ 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.Id t I I I t I T t I T I I ! T I I I I I TWO.WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY H*ffi$[$iiffi$"$, ,0"i,$1ffi Fri;iiffiffiffiHdfril;B:lffi |;',I,.#Lj Analyst CDR Agency/Co. Kmley-Horn Date Performed 8/4/2006 Analysis Time Period TotalAM Peak lntersection CR-335 & White Water Lane Jurisdiction Garfield County Analysis Year 2008 )roiect Descriotion The Rapids on the Colorado EastMest Street: CR-335 tlorth/South Street: White Water Lane (B) ntersection Orientation: East-West 3tudv Period (hrs): 0.25 Maior Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h)1 39 0 0 22 10 Peak-hour factor. PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.88 0.85 0.77 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h)1 45 0 o 25 12 Proportion of heavy vehicles, P*0 5 Median type Undivided RT Channelized?0 0 -anes 0 1 0 0 I 1 3onfiguration LT T R Uostream Sional 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R y'olume (veh/h)0 0 0 31 0 3 )eak-hour factor. PHF 0.80 0.82 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.88 {ourly Flow Rate 'veh/h)0 0 0 36 0 3 ,roportion of heavy lehicles, Pru,5 5 0 0 5 5 )ercent grade (o/o)0 0 =lared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized?0 o -anes 0 o 0 0 0 0 3onfiquration LR Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Mlovement 1 4 7 I I 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT tR Volume, v (vph)I 39 Capacity, c, (vph)1587 943 v/c ratio 0.00 0.04 Queue length (95%)0.00 0.13 Control Delay (s/veh)7.3 9.0 LOS A A Approach delay fs/veh)9.0 Aooroach LOS A ncszoo[M Copyright @ 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4. ld I I I I I T I t t I I I T I T I I I I TWO.WAY STOP GONTROL SUMMARY f,Hh affi......crffi ftm ;6, E@ Analyst CDR Agency/Co. Kmley-Horn Date Performed 8/4/2006 Analysis Time Period TotalPM Peak lntersection CR-335 &White Water Lane Jurisdiction Garfield County Analysis Year 2008 Proiect Description The Rapids on the Colorado EastMestStreet: CR-335 \orth/South Street: White Water Lane (B) lntersection Orientation: East-West lStudv Period (hrs): 0.25 Maior Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h)3 22 0 0 41 35 Peak-hour factor. PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.88 0.85 0.77 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h)3 25 0 0 48 45 Proportion of heavy vehicles, P*0 5 Median tvpe Undivided RT Channelized?0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 1 3onfiguration LT T R Jostream Sional 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 I 10 11 12 L T R L T R y'olume (veh/h)0 o 0 21 o 2 reak-hour factor, PHF 0.80 0.82 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.88 {ourly Flow Rate 'veh/h)0 0 0 24 o 2 )roportion of heavy rehicles, P*5 5 0 0 5 5 rercent grade (%)0 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized?0 0 lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 3onfiquration LR \pproach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 I 10 11 12 ,ane Configuration LT tR y'olume, v (vph)3 26 3apacity, c, (vph)1514 933 r/c ratio 0.00 0.03 Queue length (95%)0.01 0.09 3ontrol Delay (s/veh)7.4 9.0 _os A A \pproach delay ls/veh)9.0 \pproach LOS A Copyright @ 2003 University ofFlorida, All Rights Reserved Venion 4.ld APPENDIX F HCS Roodwoy Segmeni Anolysis Worksheets Kimlq-Horn anil Associates, lnc. 0960.37m0 - The Rapids on the Colorado I I I I I I I T I I I I I I I I I I I TWO-WAY TWO.LANE HIGHWAY SEGMENT WORKSHEET i;iffi (r[i]E$-xlLLtr-x.( ,-K.,,tY]?P.d(lliutli.gffi.'@ 11a!lldtffiWtf#ifl&:h .i rlil[l!]i((l.iliiiri'rir ,: r .! ,&4 #..+ ;,i;,",#,:".,::, iiId.qF \nalyst CDR \gency or Company KHA )ate Performed 81412006 \nalysis Time Period Existinq {ighway CR-335:rom/To CR-312 westadjcent to projectJurisdiction Garfield County \nalvsis Year 2006 Hffiffi{lffiJW;?. .i, iffii?A\Sffiillffiu* Effil{il U$iil$t$li}ll ji)t ffi iflLLitiu,i aj ,- ". ". . .; . q" i : Jll , -;\KiS.:qP $.t&t':s.ll EfFri.?*ffi ."i].\lil l7 ct.s I higtrway [il'i Ct"s ll highway Tenain lffi tevet l,.E Rotting Two-way hourly volume 30 veh/h Directional split 55 / 45 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.88 No-passing zone '100 % Trucks and Buses , P, 5o/o % Recreational vehicles, P" 5o/o Access points/mi 5 ffi"uefr#i4h Il $€gnrsrtlerudrL_mi 3rade adjustment factor, fG (Exhibit 20-7)1.00 )assenger-car equivalents for trucks, E, (Exhibit 20-9)1.7 ,assengercar equivalents for RVs, Ea (E)Gibit 20-9)1.0 {eavy-vehicle adjustment Actor, t^, f^,='ll 11+ P,(E,-1)+Po(Eo-l) )0.966 lwo-rlttray florv rater, v^ (pc/h) v^=V/ (PHF * fe'fpv)35 - highest directiond split proportion2 (pc/h1 19 Frce-Flolr Sneed from Field Measurerrent Estimated Free-Floar Soeed :ield Measurcd speed, Sru mi/h )bserved volume, Vf vah/h :ree-flo , speed, FFS FFS=SFM+0.0076(V/ fHV ) 39.5 mi/h lase fee-flolr speed, BFFSFM 45.( mi/t 4.i mi/I 1.: mi/t 39.t mi/t \dj. for lane width and shoulder wid$3, fLs (Exhiblt 2O5) \dj. for access points, fo (Exhibit 20€) :ree-flo,r, speed, FFS (FSS=BFFS-fo-fq) \dj. for no-passing zones, f^^ ( mi/h) (Exhiut 2G11)0.6 Werage travel speed, ATS ( mi/h) ATS+FS{.00776v^-f.^38.7 irade Adjustment factor, f" (Exhibit 2C8)1.00 )assenger+ar equivalents fur trucks, E, (Exhibit 20-10)1.1 ,assenger-car equivalonts br RVs, ER (E)(hibit 20-10)1.0 'leavy-vehicle adjustrnent tsctor, f* frr=l/ (1+ PrGrl)+Pp(En-1) )0.995 [wo,way flow ratel, vo (pc/tr) vo=V/ (PHF * fc * fw)34 ro' highest directiond split proportion2 1pclh1 19 lase percerf time-spent-following, BPTSF(%) BPTSF=1OO(1-e{'00087evr1 2.9 \dj. for directional distribution and no-passing zone, fr""(7o)(Exh. 20-12)22.1 )ercant time-spent-following, PTSF(o/o) PISF=BPTSF+f ar^.25.1 -evel of service. LOS (Ahibit 20-3 for Class I or 20.4 for Class ll)A y'olume to capacity ratio v/c v/c=%/ 3,200 0.01 reak lSmh vehfliles of travel,VMTr. (veh- mi) VMTr.= 0.25LMPHF)17 )eak-hour vehiclo-miles of bavel, VMT6. peh- mi) VMT*=y*1-,60 )eak 1$min total travel tme, TTr.(veh-h) TT.,"= VMTr./ATS 0.4 1. lf vo >= 3,200 pc/h, terminate analysis-the LOS is F. 2. lf highest directional split v.>= 1 ,700 pc/h, brminated anlysis-the LOS is F. HCS2oOOIM Copyright @ 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d I t t t I I I I t I I I t t I I I I T TWO.WAY TWO.LANE HIGHWAY SEGMENT WORKSHEET {flfl8iflfrffiffiffffffi#.iiirP.iEs,G ?i-srr!"!6r:ir,iiiffi3lilf@iituii ilAlr#I".:"..,.-1tu.i iY:lt :; ii::.i9; fie+ ll i i ;. f.:r:rY 'riri.ffir-$ii,i.i##l;iialilriz.#.,5.;.,s1}.,,Analyst CDR Agency or Company KHA Date Performed 81412006 Analvsis Time Period Backoround lighway CR-335:rom/To CR-312 west adjcent to projectJurisdiction Garfield County\nalysisYear 2008 mfi ffi ffits,1--{li(ffi i:ffi?J$rff ry;Xil.S#SAeryll;,ip,jtld-,riE4*iil3 ffiil ilL[ftt*Hi1$S?rrtl.8"# flltr'F,]i,Di# S#, rilriffiS$ffii'S"q+ F CA.t lhighway lffi Ct"r, tt highway Tenain H tevet fE Rotting Two-way hourly volume 32 veh/h Directional split 55 / 45 Peak-hourfactcr, PHF 0.88 No-passing zone 100 % Trucks and Buses , Pa 5 o/o 7o Recreational vehicles, P* 5% Access points/ mi 5 Scgorrts*rlorqgd} \_mi Srade adjustnentfactor, fc (Exhibit 20-7)1.00 )assenger+ar equlvalonts br trucks, Er (Exhibit 20-9)'t.7 ,assengerrarequivalentB for RVs, ER (Exhibit 20.9)1.0 leavy-vehicle adjustment Actor, f* f*=1/ (1+ Pr(ET.1)+pR(En-l) )0.966 lwo-way flow rater, vo Oc/tr) vo=V/ (PHF'fc . fsv)38 /D * hlghest directircnd split proportion2 1pcn1 21 Free-Flory Speed from Field Measursnent Estimated Free-Florv Soeed =ield Measurcd sp€ed, SFM mi/h )bservedvolume,V, veh/h :ree-flovv speed, FFS FFS=Srr+0.0026(V/fHv ) 39.5 mi/h Base ftee-florv speed, BFFS*45.r mi/l 4.i mi/t f.i mU[ 39.t mi/t {dj. forlane width and shoutderwidth3, ts Gxhibit 2().5) \dj. foraccess points, fA Gxhibit 206) :ree-floi, speed, FFS (FSS=BFFS-far-fo) Mj. for nopassing zones, f.. ( mi/h) (Exhitit 20-l 1)0.7 verage travsl speed, ATS ( mi/h) ATS=FFS-0.00776v^-f*38.6 Grade Adjushrentfactor, f" (Exhibit 20-8)1.00 Passengerrar equivalents for trucks, E, (Exhibit 20-10)1.1 Passenger-car oquivalents for RVs, ER (Ahibit 20-lO)1.0 {eavy-vehic{e adjustmont Ador, f* fru=I/ (1+ pr(ET-1)+pR(ER-1) )0.99s Iwo-rray flor rate1, vo (pc/h) vo=V/ (PHF. fc * fHV)37 ro * highest directiond split propodion2 (pc/h)20 Sase percent lime-spent-following, BPTSF(yo) BPTSF=100(1-e{'00087evr1 3.2 \dj. for direcdonal distribLtion and no-passing zone, f,n^(yo)(Exh.2G12l 22.1 )erc6nt lime-spent-following, PTSF(%) PTSF=BPTSF+f d,^^25.3 -evel of service, L9S (Bhibit 20-3 for Class I or 20-4 for Class ll)A /olume to capacity ratio v/c v/c=Vo/ 3,200 0.01 Peak 15.min v€hfliles of travel,VMTru (veh- mi) VMTrr= 0.2sLrMpHF)18 )eak-hour vehicle+nles of Savel, VMT6. (veh- mi) VMT*=V-\64 )eak l*min total travel lime, fir"(veh-h) TTr.= VMT,^/ATS 0.5 1. lf vo >= 3,200 pc;/h, terminate analysis-the Los is F. 2. lf highest directional split vD>= 1 ,700 pc/h, brminated anlysis-the Los is F. Version 4.1dHCSmOO-tM Copyright @2000 Univeoity of Florida, All Rights Reserved I t I I I I I I t I t I I I T I I I I TWO.WAY TWO.LANE HIGHWAY SEGMENT WORKSHEET ffihiffii St$lfil#i#tr{ElLl4| I Analyst CDR Agency or Company KHA Date Performed A412006 Analysis Time Period Backoround olus Droiect {ighway CR-335;rom/To CR-312 west adjcent to projectJurisdiction Garfield County \nalvsis Year 2008 ffi,lfiii(Lr ffill+ffiffii iiffi*l$.N'rj yj,ffiffiffiiffi.., .r"WrL,. .,,1.r.r ;Y lE Ctr.. I higrrway # Chr. tt highway Terrain l# rcvet FE notting Two-way hourly volume 1'19 veh/h Directional split 65 / 35 Peak-hourfacbr, PHF 0.88 Nepassing zone 100 7o Trucks and Buses , P, 5Yo % Recreational vehicles, PR 5o/o Access pointsr/mi 5 3rade adjustmentfactor, fo (Exhibit 2CD 1.00 ,assenger-carequivalents for trucks, Er (Hhibit 20-g)1.7 )assenger-car equivalents for RVs, ER (Exhibit 20-9)1.0 {eavy-veHcle adjustment frctor, f* f*=1/ (1+ PrGT.l)+PRGR-l) )0.966 l'wo+rray llow ratel, v" (pc/h) v.=V/ (PHF * fil'fuv)140 rr' highest directiond split proportion2 1pcn1 91 Free-Floar Speed frcm Field Measur€rnent Estimated Free-Florr Soeed Field Measured speed, S* mi/h Observedvolume,V, veh/h Free-flom speed, FFS FFS=Srn +0.QQn6Nl lflv ) 39.5 mi/h 3ase fee-floiv speed, BFFSFM 45.r myl 4.1 mUl 1.: min 39.1 mi/l \dj. for lane width and shoulderwidth3, fLs Gxhiblt 2G5) \dj. for access points, fo (Exhibit 206) :ree-flol Speed, FFS (FSS=BFFS-f6-f1) Adj. for nopassing zones, fhh ( mi/h) (Exhifit 20-11)2.5 Average travel speed, ATS ( mi/h) ATSfF$,0.00776v"-f""36.0 Srade Adjustmentfactor, fG Gxhibit 20-8)1.00 rassenger-car equivalents for tucks, Er (Exhibit 2G10)1.1 )assenger-car equivalents for RVs, En (Ahibit 2G10)1.0 leavy-vehicle adjustment 6ctor, fsu frr=l/ (1+ P1(E11)+P*(E*-{; ;0.995 l'wo-way flow ratel, vo Odtr) vo=V/ (PHF * fe 'fr+r)136 ro' highest directiond split proportionz 1potrl 88 Sase percerttime-spent-following, BPTSF(%) BPTSF='t00(1-e'o.mo87evD)11.3 \dj. for directional distriburtion and no-passing zone, f,ilh"(%XExh. 20-12,25.2 )ercent time-spent-following, PTSF(%) PTSF=BPTSF+f ar^.36.5 -evel of service, LOS (Bhibit 20-3 for Class I or 20.4 for Class ll)A /olume to capacity ratio v/c v/c=Vn/ 3,200 0.04 )eak 1$min veh-rniles of travel,VMTru (veh- mi) VMTrr= 0.25\MPHF)68 )eak-hour vehicle-mtres of travel, VMTM (veh- mi) VMT*=\r1{238 )eak 1$mh total travel lime, TTr.(veh-h) TTr.= [g1r.6T9 1.9 1. lf vo >= 3,200 pc/h, terminate analysis-the LOS is F. 2. lf highest directional split v.>= 1,700 pc/h, brminated anlysis-the LOS is F. HCS200o1M Copyright @2000 Universig of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.ld I I I I T I I T I T T t I t I t T I t TWO.WAY TWO.LANE HIGHWAY SEGMENT WORKSHEET lififfil#fiAffiinzniiilI.,riiiilvwffiil$Sffi i!ffi ,r:!* ilii"r,lir,ti.i'll$.]ii;% ftw4ff;i$r i, Illr$ii tiiLlffi ffi | $ \nalyst CDR \gency or Company KHA )ate Performed 81412006 \nalvsis Time Period Existino {ighway CR-335:rom/To CR-312 to New Castle l-70 lntlurisdiction Garfield County \nalvsis Year 2006 lG Chr. I highway lP cuss ll highway Terrain lffi tevet [E Rotting Two-way hourly volume 402 veh/h Directional split 60 / 40 Peak-hourfacbr, PHF 0.88 No,passing zone 100 7o Trucks and Buses , P, 5oh o/o Recreational vehicles, PR 5o/o Access pointsi/mi 10 S ShruH*r rmic&h nl 3rade adjustnent factor, fG (Exhibit 20-7)1.00 )assenger-car equivalents for trucks, E, (Exhibit 20-9)1.7 )assenger-car equivalents for RVs, ER (Exhibit 20.9)t.0 {eavfvehicle adjustment tsctor, t* l^,='ll (1+ PrGr-1)+Po(Eo-l) )0.966 lwo'way flow ratel, v, (pc/h) vo=V/ (PHF'fo 'fsv)473 t highest directiond split proportion2 lpcltrl 2U Frce-Flor Soeed from Field Measurement Estimated Free-Flor/ Soeed :ield Measurcd speed, SFM mi/h )bserved volume, V, veh/h :rce-flor speed, FFS FFS=Sru+0.00nGN/ lflv ) 38.3 mUh Base free-floiv speed, BFFSFM 45.( mUl 4.1 mYl 2.1 mUl 38.: mUl Adj. for lane width and shoulder widh3, fls (Exhibit 2C5) Adj. for access poinb, fo (Exhibit 2G6) Free-flom speed, FFS (FSS=BFFS-fag-fo) \dj. for nopassing zones, f* ( mi/h) (ExhiUt 20-11)4.3 Verage travel speed, ATS ( mi/h) ATSfF$0.@776v^-f^^30.3 irade Adjustrnent factor, fo (Exhibit 20-8)1.00 )ass€nger-car equivalents for trucks, Er (Exhibit 20-10)1.1 Passengerrar equivalents for RVs, ER (Ahibit 20-10)1.0 leavy-vehicle adjustnent tsctor, f* f*=1/ ('l + PrErl )+Pp(En-1) )0.995 lwo-way florrrr ratei, v^ (pc/tr) v^=V/ (PHF * fc * fw)459 r. * highest dlrectiond split proportion2 (pc/h)275 3ase percent time-spent-following, BPTSF(%) BPTSF=I 00(1 -e'0.00087evr1 33.2 Mj. for directional dlstribution and no'passing zone, fr^^(%)(Exh. 20-12)21.8 )ercent lime-spent-fofiowing, PTSF(Yo) PTSF=BPTSF+f ar."55.0 -evel of service, LOS (fthibit 20-3 for Class I or 2}41or Class ll)B y'olume to capacity ratio vlc vlc=Y^l 3,200 0.15 )eak 15-min veh<niles of travel,VMTr. (veh- mi) VMT,^= 0.251-MPHF)114 reak-hour vehicle-mles of havel, VMT6o Oeh- mi) VMT*=V*1,4@. )eak 1S-mln total travel tme, TTrs(veh-h) TTr.= VMTr^/ATS 3.8 . lf v, >= 3,200 pc/h, terminate analysis.the LOS is F. 2. lf highest directional split vo>= 1,700 pc/h, brminated anlysis-the LOS is F. HCSmOOTM Copyright @ 2000 Univeaity of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d I t I I I I I I t T I I I T t t I I I TWO-WAY TWO.LANE HIGHWAY SEGMENT WORKSHEET d ,il#::,i,Yiiid#Kt$.W9*?FYilirtliL iir I l#ii;::::::::.:.Si iXlfl/Ji+::r.i-",7,/rurWl {nalyst CDR \gency or Company KHA )ate Performed U412006 \nalvsis Time Period Backoround lighway CR-335=rom/To CR-312 to New Castle l-70 lntlurisdiction Garfield County \nalysis Year 2008 F Cl".r I higtrway lW Cus ll highway Tenain ffi tevet l.* notting Two-way hourly volume 426 veh/h Directional split 60 / 40 Peak-hourfacbr, PHF 0.88 Nopassing zone 100 7o Trucks and Buses , P, soh o/o Recreational vohicles, PR 5o/o Access pointsy'mi 10 I I Shou$rwictrh ". *.."_.."-"11 3rade adjustment factor, fo fixhibit 2G7)1.00 )assenger-car equivalents for fucks, Er (Exhibit 20-9)'t.7 )assonger-car equivalents for RVs, ER Gxhibit 20-9)1.0 {eavy-vehicle adjustment tsctor, f* f*=17 11 + P1G11 )+e"1E.-1 I ;0.966 fwo{ay flo\i/ ratel, v" (pc/h) v^=V/ (PHF'fe * frrr)501 r, * highest dircctiond split proportion2 (pc/h)301 Fl€e-Flofl SDeed from Field Measurernent Estimated Free-Flor Soeed Field Measured speed, Sr, mi/h Observed vdume, V, veh/h FBe-flo^, speed, FFS FFS=SFM+0.00776(V/ fHV ) 38.3 mi/h lase tree-flor speed, BFFSFM 45.r mi/l 4.i mYl 2.1 mi/l 38.: mUt \dj. for lane width and shoulder width3, fLs (Exhibit 2G5) Mj. for access pctints, fo Gxhibit 206) :ree-flo1, speed, FFS (FSS=BFFS-f6-f1) \dj. for no-paesing zones, f.. ( mi/h) (ExhiUt 20-1 1)4.2 ryerage travel speed, ATS ( mi/h) ATS=FFS{.00776v^-f."30.2 3ra(h Adjustnont factor, f" (Exhibit 20-8)1.00 rassenger-car equivalents br tnrks, E, (Exhibit 20-10)1.1 rassenger+ar equivalenE for RVs, ER Gxhibit 20-10)1.0 {eavy-vehicle adjustment Ador, f6, f*=1/ (1+ Pr(Efl)+PeG*-f ; 1 0.995 l'wo-way flow ratel, vo (pdh) vo=V/ (PHF * fc * frry)487 /o * highest directiond split proportion2 1pcn1 292 3ase percer*time-spenFfoHowino. BPTSF(%) BPTSF=100(1-e-0.00087evo1 34.8 \dj. for dhectkrnal distribdion and nepassing zone, fr,"^(o/o)(Exh. 20-,12)21.5 )ercent lime-spent-follortring, PTSF(%) PTSF=BPTSF+f ,,^^56.4 -evel of service, LOS (ehibit 20-3 for Class I or 20-4 for Ctass il)c /olume to capacity ratio v/c v/c=Vo/ 3,200 0.16 )eak 15-min vehrniles of travel,VMTru (veh- mi) VMT.,'= O.2SqMPHF)121 )eak-hour vehicle-mles of havel, VMT6o (veh- mi) VMT*=y'1,4X; )eak 1&min total travel tme, TTrs(veh-h) firo= VMT,./ATS ,1.0 1. lf v, >= 3,200 pc/h, terminate analysi+the LOS is F. 2. lf highest directional split vD>= 1 ,700 pc/h, terminated anlysis-the LOS is F. HCS200orM Copyright @ 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.'ld I T I T T I T I I ! I t T I I I t T I TWO-WAY TWO-LANE HIGHWAY SEGMENT WORKSHEET Analyst CDR Agency or Company KHA Date Performed A4l2OOo Analysis Time Period Background plus project Highway cR-335 CR-312 to New Castle l-70 lnt Garfield County ffii4lliffiffit 4 $119,,i.:,;:l.llllffirL e-r.r,i ir3/i;rffi t lil cu* I highway l,F ct"r, n highway Tenain lH Levet lil Rotting Two.way hourly volume 631 veh/h Directional split 60 / 40 Peak-hourfactor, PHF 0.88 No.passing zone 100 % Trucks and Buses , P, 5 o/o o/o Recreational vehicles, P^ 1Yo Access points/mi 10 I I itroumr-.ti*ri -:.:^_71 3rade adjustment factor, fc (Exhibit 20-7)1.00 Passenger-car equivalents br kucks, E, (Bhibit 20-9)1.2 ,assenger+arequivalents for RVs, ER (Exhibit 20-9)1.0 {eavy-vehicle adjustment Actor, f* f*=1l (1+ PrGT.l)+PR(En-1) )0.990 lwo'way floiv rate1, v, (pc/h) vo=V/ (PHF * fc * fnv)724 ro 'highest direc.tiond split proportion2 (pc/h)4v Free-Flov Speed from Field Measursnent Estimatod Free-Flcrrv Soeed Field Measurcd speed, Sr* mi/h Observed volume, V, veh/h Free-flov speed, FFS FFS=SFM+0.0076(V/ frv ) 38.3 mi/h Base free-flor speed, BFFS'^,45.( mUt f.i mi/t 2., mi/t 38.: mi/t Adj. for lane width and shoulder width3, f.a (Exhibit 20.,5) Mj. for access points, fA (Exhibit 20€) :ree-flovv speed, FFS (FSS=BFFS-fas-fo) Mj. fornopassing zones, f,. ( mifi) (Exhitit 2&11)3.3 Average havel speed, ATS ( mi/h) ATS=fF$0.00726v^-f"^29.3 Grade Adjustment factor, fo (Exhibit 20-B)1.00 Passenger+ar equivalenb for trucks, Er (Exhibit 20-i0)1.1 Passenger-car equivalenb for RVs, ER Gxhibit 20-10)1.0 f{eavy-ve}$cle adjustment bctor, f* f*=17 (1+ PrErl)+PR(ER-l) )0.995 Iwo-way flor ratel, vo (pc/h) vo=V/ (PHF * fc . fr.rv)721 ro 'highest directiond split proportion2 (pc/h)43ra| 3ase percer* time-sp€nhfollowing, BPTSF(%) BPTSF=100(1-e{'00087ev01 46.9 \dj. for directional distribution and no-passing zone, fda.(yoxExh. 20-12)16.9 rercent time-spent-follo$ring, PTSF(%) PTSF=BpTSF+f ,,^^63.8 -evol of service, LOS (&hibit 20-3 for Class I or 2O-4 for Ctass il)C /olume to capacity ratio v/c v/c=Vo/ 3,200 0.23 )eak l$mh vehmiles of thel,VMTru (veh- mi) VMTrr= O.2SqMPHF)179 Peak-hour vehide-mles of favel, VMT6. (veh- mi) VMT*=y1*631 reak ltmh total travel tme, TTr.(veh-h) TTr.= VMT,c/ATS 6.'r 'l . lf vo>= 3,200 pc/h, terminate analysisthe Los is F. 2. lf highest directional split v.>= 1 ,7oo pc,/h, terminated anlysis-the LoS is F. Version 4.1dHCS2oOO-tM Copyright @ 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved APPENDIX G Proiect Trqffic Volume lncreose Colculotion Kimley -H orn anil As s o c.iate s, ln c. 096037ffi0 -ruWds onthe Colorado I I I t T I I I t I T I T I T t T T I Proiect Traffic Volume lncrease Calculation WB l-70 Ramp at Newcastle lnterchange Off Ramp On Ramp AM Peak PM Peak AM Peak PM Peak 2006 Existing Volume Project Traffic Volume Percent lncrease 2006 Existing Volume Project Traffic Volume Percent lncrease 58 159144664 16.30/o 8.7Yo 10.3oh 2.5o/o EB l-70 Ramp at Newcastle lnterchange Off Ramp On Ramp AM Peak PM Peak AM Peak PM peak 115 10227 559 19240 27 1.7Yo 6.90/o 7.2o/o 14.1o/o EXHIBIT 25 Road Plan and Profile Design, Utility Line Location Design EXHIBIT 25 Exhibit 25 Page 2 PP EF HE E6I E E E .6'rr' IiEEII.E EO $ e t99FFStiEE88 rattaa'9ator $$r $r I F!\U(a o =HEN ao Fro Ntro h = N EHIE EEsE EI}S sI*N SE*g SX FE N i EffH iifisF E;iiH ffi*E EETEEE Pa E5 S') (o o g rl t .Nu pl *i 1oI F o .f; ts E f, IN 8. o@ IN{ Ioo i3IlnOE The RAPIDS on the COLORADO Planned Unlt Development PRELIMINARY PLAN M(x$nItIN eROSs ENGINEERIFI(il II!C. Ch,f rd ti*oe.rDu Ccnrll{ rd D..tnt.l lA d &IL Ono., Srltl.i 0O atat