Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication-PermitI Garfield County Building & Planning Department 108 8th Street, Suite #401 Glenwood Springs, Co. 81601 Office:970·945·8212 Fax: 970·384-3470 Inspection Line: 970-384-5003 Building Permit No. 11236 Parcel No: 2409-242-00-156 Locality: Job Address: 4827 CR 300 Parachute -- Use of Building: ___ ...... __ s:::.:/f~dv;elling on crCl_v;lspace w/ covered P<l_~Qi) _____ _ Owner: __ M_etcalf, Carl &g~ristina Contractor: Fees: Plan Check: $ 1,468.58 Septic: $ ~~,_~----..... Bldg Permit: $ 2,259.35 Other Fees: Total Fees: _$_ ... ~.800.93 Clerk: Date: 2/25/2009 73.00 I I 2 3 4 5 6 7 GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION 108 8" Street, Suite 401, Glenwood Springs, Co 81601 Phone: 970-945-8212/ Fax: 970-384-3470 I Inspection Line: 970-384-5003 www.garficldwcounty.com Parcel No: (this information is available at the assessors office 970-945*9134) ?4()Q?.4?()()1 ~h Job Address: (if an address bas not been assigneQ, please provideCr, Hwy or Street Name & City) or and legal description 4827 County Road 300 Parachute, CO 81635 Lot No: Parcel 3 Block No: Subd./ Exemption: 'il ... , Owner: ('Mpet!y owner) Mail\r Addre'Q: '""'"' . PhG18-7387 Carl . & Christina Met cal 10 Van Horn Ln Contractor: Mailing Address: Ph: 'l'<>n<>Rtnr Rni 1 r1PrR IP n Rnv ,;nr;s 81 (;% ?.8'i .()':\Q8 Archttect I Engmeer: Mailing Address: Ph: Vista Engineering 605 18 1/2 Rd. G.J. 243-2242 Sq. Ft. of Building: Sq. Ft. or AcreJo~: Height: (;" ···~ -? 7' 11§'5'i.. 0,3 9 8 Alt Ph: vt:;g ~ 250-344 AltPh: No?of Floors: <88() " "' 8 Use of Building: .• ffjif@'' '14~~-~~~;'..;. >.!G;c·6.;.ls./'~c;JJ..,.rr:.~,1t Residence> ~': .. >:::' ,_,_ . ·---· 9 Describe Work: I dwelli;'g, 2 . I crawl Build New S.F. storJ.es on space 10 Class of Work: ;QNew o Alteration o Addition II Garage: Septic: .l(ISDS None o Attached 0 Detached oCommunity 12 Driveway Permit'f:t{_p •. iifr"' AA \)pJJfJ<. yV.n 0 Q Owners valuation of Work: $ ~. This application for a sJrung Permitv must Jsigned by b!eowner of the property~d~~ above, or an authorized agent. If the signature below is not that of the Owner, a separate letter of authority, signed by the Owner, must be provided with this Application. I""' Arrn• A Building Permit cannot be issued without proof of lega1 and adequate access to the property for purposes of inspections by the Building Departmeut Otber Pmnlh. Mu1tiple separate permits may be required: (1) State Eledrital Permit, (2) County JSDS Permit, (3) another permit required for use on the property identified above. e.g. State or County Highway/ Road Access or a State Wastewater Discharge Pennit. \'old Psrmlt. A Building Permit becomes nu11 and void if the work authorized is not commenced within 180 days of the date ofissuance and if work is suspended or abandoned for a period of 180 days after oommencement. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that I have read this Applicatioo and that the infonnatioo wntained above is true and correct I understand that the Building Department accepts the Application, along with the plans and specifications and other data submitted by me or on my behalf (submittals), based upon my certification as to accuracy. Assuming completeness of the submittals and approval of this Application, a Building Pcnnit will be issued granting permission to me, as Owner, to construct the structure(s) and facilities detailed on the submittals reviewed by the Building Department. In considerntion of the issuance of the Building Permit, I agree that I and my agents will comply with provisions of any federal, state or local law regulating the work and the Garfield County Building Code, ISDS regulations and applicable land use regulations (County Regu1ation(s)). I acknowledge that the Building Pennit may be suspended or revoked, upon notice from the County, if the location, construction or use oftbe structure(s) and facility(ies), described above, are not in compliance with County Regulation(s) or any other applicable law. I hereby grant permission to the Building Department to enter the property, described above, to inspect the work. I further acknowledge that the issuance of the Building Permit does not prevent the Building Official from: (I) requiring the correction of errors in the submittals, if any, discovered after issuance; or (2) stopping construction or use of the structure(s) or fttcility(ics) ifsucb is in violation of County ReguJation(s) or any other applicable law. Review ofthis Application, including submittals, and · · ons of the worlc by the Building Department do not constitute an acceptance of responsibility or liability by the County of errors, omissions o.-?~Owner, I acknowledgo ;• 'bility fi,-oompliance w;tb fodenl,-and local law• ond Coonty Rog"lotiom""' w;tb me ond my outborizod """"'· inchKiing w;thoot limitation my designer, engineer and/ or der, I HEREB OWLr~ N> AND UNDERSTAND TilE NOTICE & CERTIFICATION ABOVE' ~-a ./"--.. · . r1f""':tC I 0 "d. . i. -0 I OWNERS SIGNA TIJRE \ DATE v STAFF USE ONLY Special Conditions: Adjusted Valuation: Plan Check Fee: Permit Fee: Manu home Fee: MiscFees: 3).51 o<f~. ~o f44~.5f; zz~.'¥.1 ISDS Fee: Total Fees: Fees Paid: Balance Due: ili30Da~: ISDS No & Issued Date: 11> r52 ~·'1'3 13~)0 _'Z>o ~4b2A~ lJ.h/L/ 2.2!/07 Setbacks: OCCGroup: ConstType: Zoning(( BLDG DEPT:~ e/u-t_o'l P~DEPT: 0h5"/QS APW-h\~~, ~~\J\\~~ DATE APPRo Ai~ ~ ~ DATE The following items are required by Garfield County for a final Inspection: I) A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector. 2) Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department and posted at the structure and where readily visible from access road. 3) A finished roof; a lockable building; completed exterior siding; exterior doors and windows installed; a complete kitchen with cabinets, sink with hot & cold running water, non-absorbent kitchen floor covering, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove and refrigerator; all necessary plumbing. 4) All bathrooms must be complete, with washbowl, tub or shower, toilet, hot and cold running water, non-absorbent floors, walls finished, and privacy door. 5) Steps over three (3) risers, outside or inside must be must have handrails. Balconies and decks over 30" high must be constructed to all IBC and IRC requirements including guardrails. 6) Outside grading completed so that water slopes away from the building; 7) Exceptions to the outside steps, decks, grading may be made upon the demonstration of extenuating circumstances., i.e. weather. Under such circumstances A Certificate of Occupancy may be issued conditionally. 8) A final inspection sign off by the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department for driveway installation, where applicable; as well as any final sign off by the Fire District, and/or State Agencies where applicable. A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (C.O.) WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL TilE ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. A C.O. MAY TAKE UP TO 5 BUSINESS DAYS TO BE PROCESSED AND ISSUED. OWNER CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A C.O. IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATING PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET. I understand and agree to abide by the above conditions for occupancy, use and the issuance of a C.O. for the building identified in the Bui ding Permit. DATE Bapplicationdecember2007 VALUATION FEE DETERMINATION Applicant Address Date ~C::;:ar:,:l-:,&~C;:::hri=·s'i"ti::;na:.;M"-"'et:::ca:::l.::..f _____ Subdivision 4827 CR 300. Parachute LoWiock .,:2c:;:/2;:,5c.,/2:0:0~09F===:=.. _____ Contractor Finished (Livable Area): Main Upper Lower Other Total Basement: Unfinished Square Feet Valuation Conversion of Unfinished to Finished Total Valuation Garage: Carport: Total Valuation Crawl Space Total Valuation Decks/ Patios Total Covered Open Valuation Type of Construction: Occupancy: Valuation Total Valuation 2444 sq.ft 1436 sq.ft sq.ft sq.ft X $74.68 3880 sq.ft sq.ftX $41.00 sq.ft X $33.68 sq.ftX $18.00 sq.ft X $12.00 2444 sq.ftX $9.00 556 sq.ft X $24.00 sq.ft X $12.00 Commercial sf X sf X sf X sf X sf X sf X 289,758.40 0.00 0.00 21,996.00 13,344.00 0.00 325,098.40 GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING 970-945-8212 MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS For SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING CONSTRUCTION Including NEW CONSTRUCTION ADDITIONS ALTERATIONS And MOVED BUILDINGS In order to understand the scope of the work intended under a permit application and expedite the issuance of a permit it is important that complete information be provided. When reviewing a plan and it's discovered that required information has not been provided by the applicant, this will result in the delay of the permit issuance and in proceeding with building construction. The owner or contractor shall be required to provide this information before the plan review can proceed. Other plans that are in line for review may be given attention before the new information may be reviewed after it has been provided to the Building Department. TWO (2) SETS OF CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS & TWO (2) SITE PLANS MUST BE SUBMITTEDFOR ALL APPLICATIONS. Please review this document to determine if you have enough information to design your project and provide adequate information to facilitate a plan review. Also, please consider using a design professional for assistance in your design and a construction professional for construction of your project. Any project with more than ten (10) occupants requires the plans to be sealed by a Colorado Registered Design Professional. To provide for a more understandable plan in order to determine compliance with the building, plumbing and mechanical codes, applicants are requested to review the following checklist prior to and during design. Applicants are required to indicate appropriately and to submit the completed checklist at time of application for a permit. Plans to be included for a Building Permit, must be on drafting paper at least 18"x24" and drawn to scale. Plans must include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations all sides with decks, balcony, steps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the finish grade line and original grade. A section showing in detail, from the bottom of the footing to the top of the roof, including re-bar, anchor bolts, pressure treated plates, floor joists, wall studs and spacing, insulation, sheeting, house-rap, (which is required), siding or any approved building material. Engineered foundations may be required. A window schedule. A door schedule. A floor framing plan, a roof framing plan, roof must be designed to withstand a 40 pound per square foot up to 7,000 feet in elevation, a 90 M.P.H. wind speed, wind exposure B or C, and a 36 inch frost depth. All sheets to be identified by number and indexed. All of the above requirements must be met or your plans will be returned. All plans submitted must be incompliance with the 2003 IRC. I. Is a site plan included that identifies the location of the proposed structure or addition and distai)ces to the property lines from each comer of the proposed structure( s) prepared by a licensed surveyor and has the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing? Properties with slopes of 30% or greater must be shown on the site plan. (NOTE Section: 106.2) Any site plan for the placement of any portion of a structure within 50 ft. of a property line and not within a previously surveyed building envelope on a subdivision final plat shall be prepared by a licensed surveyor and have the surveyor's signature and professional stamp on the drawing. Any structure to be built within a building envelope of a lot shown on a recorded subdivision plat shall include a copy of the building envelope as it is shown on the final plat with the proposed structure located within the ejlvelope. Yes v 2. Does the site plan also include any other buildings on the property, setback easements and utility easements? Please refer to Section 5.05.03 in the Garfield County Zoning Resolution if the property you are applying for a building permit on is located on a comer lot. Special setbacks do apply. / Yes v 3. Does the site plan include when applicable the location of the I.S.D.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System) and the distances to the property lines, wells (on subject property and adjacent properties), sjreams or water courses? Y esc___.::V:___ 4. Does the site plan indicate the location and direction of the County or private road accessing the property?/ Yes ____ _ 2 5. Are you aware that prior to submittal of a building permit application you are required to show proof of a legal and adequate access to the site? This may include (but is not limited to) proof of your right to use a private easemen1fright of way; A County Road and Bridge permit; a Colorado Dept. of Highway Permit, including a Notice to Proceed; a permit from the federal government or any combination. You can contact the Road & Bridge Department at 625-8601. See phone book for other agencie~ Yes __ .=/./ __ _ 6. Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all reinforcing steel in accordance with the IRC or per stamped engineered design? Yes ~ 7. Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl spaces and the clearances required between wood and earth? Yes 1-/'/ No. ____ _ 8. Do the plans indicate the size and location of ventilation openings for the attic, roof joist spaces and soffits? · Yes ~-No. ____ _ 9. Do the plans include design loads as required by Garfield County for roof snow loads, (a minimum of 40 pounds per square foot up to & including 7,000 feet above sea level), floor loads and wind loads? /' Yes. _____ _ 10. Does the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor, and roof construction? .__...-/. Yes. _____ _ 11. Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists, wall studs, ceiling joists, roof rafters or~.or trusses? Yes. _____ _ 12. Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method of positive connection of all columns and beams;./ Yes ~ 13. Does the elevation plan indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the undisturbed grade to the midpoint between the ridge and eave of a gable or shed roof or the top of a flat roof? p3uilding height measurement usually not to exceed 25 feet) Yes 1L 14. Does the plan include any stove or zero clearance fireplace planned for installation including make and model an9lorado Phase II certifications or phase II EPA certification? Yes No. _______ _ 3 15. Does the plan include a masonry fireplace including a fireplace section indicating design to comply with the IRC? Yes ______ No ..__.--· 16. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that egress/rescue windows from sleeping roo~d/or basements comply with the requirements of the IRC? Yes · 17. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that windows provide natural light and ventilation for althabitable rooms? Yes ~ ---~ 18. Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass doors, glazing immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as a walking surface; sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub enclosures and specifY safety glazing for these areas? Yes ~No ____________ _ 19. Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces, boilers and water heaters indicated on theplan? ~/ Yes ____ _ 20. Do you understand that if you are building on a parcel of land created by the exemption process or the subdivision process, are building plans in compliance with all plat notes and/or covenants? Yes .....,......--- 21. Do you understand that if you belong to a Homeowners Association (HOA), it is your responsibility to obtain written permission from the association, if required by that association, prior to submitting an application for a building permit? The building permit application will be accepted without it, but you run the risk of the HOA bringing action to enforce the covenants, which can result in revocation of permit issued. Additionally, your Plan Review fee is not refundable if the plans have been reviewed by the Building Department prior to any action by the HOA that requires either revocation or substantial modification of the plans. Yes ~U 22. Will this be the only residential structure on the parcel? Yes ~ No Ifno-Explain: ____________ _ 23. Have two (2) complet(l sets of construction drawings been submitted with the application? Yes c~ 24. Do you understanft that the minimum dimension a home can be on a lot is 20ft. wide and 20ft. long? Yes V ----'"'---- 4 25. Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other construction code requirements? Yes /' 26. Do your plans comply with all zoning rules and regulations in the County related to your properties zone district? / Yes. ____________ __ 27. Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a final inspection by the Garfield <_)unty Building Department? Yes • 28. Do you understand that approval for design and/or construction changes are required prior to the application of these changes? Yes c./" 29. Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a "Plan Review" fee from you at the time of application submittal and that you will be required to pay the "Permit Fee" as well as any "Road Impact" or "Septic System" fees required, at the time you pick up your building permit? Yes'-----'-""""-- 30. Are you aware that you must call in for an inspection by 3:30 the business day before the requested inspection in order to receive it the following business day? Inspections will be made from 7:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. Monday through Friday. Inspections are to be called in to 384-5003. Y es. ____ __j,~- 31. Are you aware that requesting inspections on work that is not ready or not accessible will result in a $50.00 re-inspection fee? Yes ._....-·~ 32. Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the IRC including approval on a final inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy and occupancy of the building? v Yes __________ _ 33. Are you aware that the Permit Application must be signed by the Owner or a written authority being given for an Agent and that the party responsible for the project must comply with the IRC? Yes ....... ..-/ 5 34. Do you understand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed Electrician and Plumber to perform installations and hookups, unless you as the homeowner are performing the work? The license number of the person performing the work will be required at time of applicable inspection. Yes ______ ,c:_ __ _ 35. Are you aware, that on the front of the Building Permit Application you will need to fill in the Parcel/Schedule Number for the lot you are applying for this permit on prior to submittal of a building permit application? Your attention in this is appreciated. Yes ' 36. Do you know that the local fire district may require you to submit plans for their review of fire safety issues? Yes /(please check with the building department about this requirement) 37. Do you understand that if you are planning on doing any excavating or grading to the property prior . to issuance of a puilding permit that you will be required to obtain a grading permit? Yes .__...--~' 38. Are you aware that if you will be connecting to a public water and/or sewer system, that the tap fees have to be paid and the connections inspected by the service provider prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Qceupancy? Yes ~ Signature of Owner Date Phone: Cf 7D · (o lntl3>f) '1, (days); _________ _.:(evenings) Project Name: (12 c 7 C4 c. -r /?rs-t a &u c c., ProjectAddress: <-;<?a 7 C~AJry Ru,~.{j 3oo &.ri'AC::#c,-("Te__ 6 Notes: If any required information is missing delays in issuing the permit are to be expected. Work may not proceed without the issuance of a permit. If it is determined by the Building Official that additional information is necessary to review the application and plans to determine minimum compliance with the adopted codes, the application may be placed behind more recent applications for building permits in the review process and not reviewed until required information has been provided and the application rotates again to first position for review, delay in issuance of the permit or delay in proceeding with construction. BpminreqDec2007 7 APPROXIMATE SCALE 1'=80' LEGEND • EXPLORATORY PIT ~ 0 Q $ ~ 0 0' 0 ~ UQ;:- &!i? ~ 0 QQ? l.i; t$ G ~ B 109 OO?A ~ H worth-Powfak Geotechntcal -................ --.. ~. EXISllNG POND WATER SURFACE AVERAGE ELEVATION= 5033.2' ON 5-13.()8 FUTURE l SITE EXISTING AV ELEVATION=5 PROPOSED RESIDENCE, EXISTING AVERAGE GROUND ELEVATION= 5046.5' ~· ··~. \'" ~ '\ TO COUNTY ROAD 300, "--·. ,-:Ji' APPROXIMATELY 600 FEET LOCATIONS OF EXPLORATORY PITS AND PERGOLA TION TEST HOLES Figure 1 • January 26, 2009 Mike Metcalf 4827 County Road 300 Parachute, Colorado 81635 j ki·ll'••:tl,-1->1\'il.l!. \. h•·li<:!!l!h d. i·~· ::..-"_:\'I_· F-:···pl ! ~-! (.>kil•.v • .-•. J ! 'h, q· ... .:: •)/ ,·'.t/.j s ' F~l'-:: ;~(;_' 'H~-~ .. ~5'! <:·tn;_oil: i q:·~<·· • '}··l,~·;.:: •. ·>~ . .:'t. !J.,_ <otH Job No. 109 007A Subject: Subsoil Study for Foundation Design and Percolation Test, Proposed Residence, Parcel3, 4827 County Road 300, Two Miles South of Parachute, Garfield County, Colorado Dear Mike: As requested, Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, 1nc. perfOrmed a subsoil study and . . - percolation test for foundation and septic disposal designs at the subject site. The study was conducted in accordance with our agreement for geotechnical engineering services to you dated January I 5, 2009. The data obtained and our recommendations based on the proposed construction and subsurface conditions encountered are presented in this report. Proposed Construction: The residence will be a two story wood frame structure located on the site as shown on Figure l. Ground floors will be structural over crawlspace. ·Cut depths are expected to range between about 1 to 2 feet. Foundation loadings for this type of construction are assumed to be relatively light and typical of the proposed type of construction. An on-site septic disposal system (OWTS) is planned to the east of the residence. If building conditions or foundation loadings are significantly different from those de.qcrfued above, we should be notified to re-evaluate the recommendations presented in this report. Site Conditions: The site, which is located southwest of Battlement Mesa and north of County Road 300, has undergone some previous site grading. The site grading consisted of apparent shallow fill placement probably from excavation for the existing pond located about 80 feet south of the proposed residence. The pond had an average water surfacE! elevation of about 12 feet below the building site in May 2008 as shown on the plat -2- survey. Along the west side of the site, about l 00 feet north of the house site, is the Colorado River which has a I 00 year flood elevation of about 5040 feet (at the building site) as provided by Water Resource Consultants in their letter dated September 19, 2008. The ground surface at the building and septic disposal sites is relatively flat with a slight slope down to the northeast. Elevation difference across the proposed residence is about 1 foot. Vegetation consists of grass and weeds with a few trees along the river bank. There was 6 to 12 inches of snow cover at the time of our field exploration. Subsurface Conditions: The subsurface conditions at the site were evaluated by excavating two exploratory pits (Pits I and 2) in the building area and one Profile Pit in the septic disposal area at the approximate locations shown on Figure 1. The logs of the pits are presented on Figure 2. The subsoils encountered, below about I to 2 feet of gravelly fill, consisted of very stiff, sandy to Vt)rysandy clay and silt that was slightly gravelly in Pit I and in the Profile Pit, to gravelly. with scattered cobbles in Pit 2. The clay and silt soils extended down to the pit depths of 6 feet in Pit 2 and 8 feet in the Profile Pit, and to a depth of about 8 feet in Pit I where medium dense, silty sand was encountered to a depth of about 13 feet underlain by relatively dense, silty sandy gravel and cobbles. Results of swell-consolidation testing performed on relatively undisturbed samples of the clay and silt subsoils, presented on Figures 4 and 5, indicate low compressibility under existing moisture conditions and light loading, and generally a low collapse potential (settlement under constant load) when wetted under a constant 1,000 psf surcharge. The samples showed moderate compressibility when loaded after wetting. Results of gradation analyses performed on a disturbed bulk sample of the clay and silt subsoils from the Profile Pit are presented on Figure 6. The laboratory test results are summarized in. Table I. No free water was observed in the pits at the time of excavation and the soils were slightly moist to moist. Foundation Bearing Conditions: It should be feasible to found the residence on a lightly loaded spread footing foundation system with some risk of settlement. The risk of settlement is primarily if the bearing soils become wetted and precautions should be taken to prevent wetting. Extending the foundation down to the underlying dense coarse gravels such as with a driven piles or drilled piers would provide a relatively low risk of foundation movement. Provided below are recommendations for a spread footing foundation system. If recommendations for piles or piers are desired, we should be contacted. Joh No. I 09 007 A - 3 - Foundation Recommendations: Considering the subsoil conditions encountered in the exploratory pits and the nature of the proposed construction, we recommend the building be founded with spread footings placed on the undisturbed natural soil designed for an allowable bearing pressure of 1,500 psf. The soils tend to compress after wetting and there could be some post-construction foundation settlement. Based on experience, we expect settlement of footings will be about I inch. There could be some additional settlement up to about Y, inch depending on the depth and extent of the wetting. Footings should be a minimum width of 18 inches for continuous walls and 2 feet for columns. All fill, topsoil and loose or disturbed soils encountered at the foundation bearing level within the excavation should be removed and the footing bearing level extended down to the undisturbed natural soils. The fuoting subgrade should then be moistened and compacted. Exterior footings should be provided with adequate cover above their bearing elevations for frost protection. Placement of footings at least 36 inches below the exterior grade is typica!Iy used. in this area. Continuous foundation wails should be we!I reinforced top and bottom to span local anomalies and better withstand the effects of some differential settlement such as by assuming an unsupported length of at least 14 feet. Foundation wails acting as retaining structures should also be designed to resist a lateral earth pressure based on an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 55 pcf for the on-site soil as backfill. Surface Drainage: A perimeter foundation drain around sha!Iow crawlspace areas, less than 4 feet deep, should not be needed with positive slope away from the foundation wails control ofroofrunoffand adequate compaction ofthe foundation backfi!I. The fo!Iowing drainage precautions should be observed during construction and maintained at ali times after the residence has been completed: I) Inundation of the foundation excavations and underslab areas should be avoided during construction. 2) Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density in pavement and slab areas and to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density in landscape areas. 3) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions. We recommend a minimum slope of 6 inches in the first I 0 feet in unpaved Job No. I 09 007 A -4- areas and a minimum slope of 3 inches in the first I 0 feet in pavement and walkway areas. 4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill. 5) Landscaping which requires regular heavy irrigation should be located at least 5 feet from the building. Consideration should be given to the use of xeriscape to limit potential wetting of soils below the building caused by irrigation. Percolation Testing: Percolation tests were conducted on January 21, 2009 to evaluate the feasibility of an infiltration septic disposal system at the site. One profile pit and three percolation holes were dug at the locations shown on Figure I. The test holes (nominal 12 inch diameter by 12 inch deep) were hand dug at the bottom of shallow backhoe pits and were soaked with water one day prior to testing. The soils exposed in the percolation holes are similar to those exposed in the Profile Pit shown on Figure 2 and consist of sandy to very sandy clay and silt. The weather conditions during the percolation testing were partly cloudy and cold. The percolation test holes were protected from freezing during the testing. Soil temperatures were 36° to 37°F at the time of testing. The percolation test results, presented in Table 2, indicate percolation rates from about I 00 to 240 minutes per inch. According to USDA soil type classification, the soil is Loam. The long term acceptance rate (LTAR) of Loam is considered to be about 0.50 gallons per square foot per day. A qualified professional should design the septic disposal system. Limitations: This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no warranty either expressed or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the exploratory pits excavated at the locations indicated on Figure I, the proposed type of construction and our experience in the area. Our services do not include determining the presence, prevention or possibility of mold or other biological contaminants (MOBC) developing in the future. If the client is concerned about MOBC, then a professional in this special field of practice should be consulted. Our findings include interpolation and extrapolation of the subsurface conditions identified at the exploratory pits and variations in the subsurface conditions may not become evident until excavation is performed. If conditions encountered during construction appear different from those described in this report, we should be notified at once so re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made. Job No. 109 007A -5- This rep01t has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes. We are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our infOrmation. As the project evolves, we should provide continued consultation and field services during construction to review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations, and to verity that the recommendations have been appropriately interpreted. Significant design changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommendations presented herein. We recommend on-site observation of excavations and foundation bearing strata and testing of structural fiJI by a representative of the geotechnical engineer. If you have any questions or if we may be of further assistance, please let us know. RespectfulJy Submitted, Daniel E. Hardin, P.E. DAY/vam attachments Figure I, Location of Exploratory Pits and Percolation Tests Figure 2, Logs of Exploratory Pits Figure 3, Legend and Notes Figures 4 and 5, SwelJ-Consolidation Test Results Figure 6, Gradation Test Results Table I, Summary of Laboratory Test Results Table 2, Percolation Test Results cc: Tapestry Builders-Attn: Jerry Witt (e-mail only) Job No. I 09 007 A ~tech APPROXIMATE SCALE 1~=80' LEGEND • EXPLORATORYPIT A PERCOLATION TEST HOLE tf 0 Q $ ~ 0 0' c UQ:-~ ~ &!!? QQ? a '-i:i t§ i! (j J ..... G~&teda H worth-Powlak Geoteehnloal 109 007A --... -.. -... -~. EXISTING POND WATER SURFACE AVERAGE ELEVATION = 5033.2' ON 5-13-oB FUTURE l SITE EXISTING AV ELEVATION=5 PROPOSED RESIDENCE, EXISTING AVERAGE GROUND ELEVATION= 5046.5' . \'" .~. ~· ··~ ~. TO COUNTY ROAD 300, . '\__., ~ APPROXIMATELY 600 FEET LOCATIONS OF EXPLORATORY PITS AND PERCOLATION TEST HOLES Figure 1 5050 5045 ~ ' c 5040 0 l w 5035 5030 109 007A PIT 1 ELEV. = 5044' PIT2 ELEV. = 5045' PROFILE PIT ELEV.= 5043' ASSUMED LOWER FLOOR LEVEL = 5047' WC=11.1 00=104 WC~15.5 00=104 , WC=13.5 I -+4=0 -200=72 WC=10.0 00=106 Note: Explanation of symbols is shown on Figure 3. ~ H worth-Pawtak Geotachntcol LOGS OF EXPLORATORY PITS 5050 5045 1ii t'1'. ' 5040 c j w 5035 5030 Figure 2 LEGEND: FILL; man-placed, clayey sandy gravel and cobbles, mixed with some topsoil, medium dense, slightly moist, brown. CLAY AND SILT (CL-ML); sandy to very sandy, slightly gravelly to gravelly with scattered cobbles in Pit 2, stiff, slightly moist to moist, brown. SAND (SM); silty, medium dense, moist, brown. GRAVEL AND COBBLES (GM); sandy, silty, dense, moist, light brown, rocks are primarily subrounded and rounded. Hand driven liner sample. Disturbed bulk sample. Indicates slotted PVC pipe installed in pit to depth shown. NOTES: 1. Exploratory borings were drilled on June 12, 2009 with 4-inch diameter continuous flight power auger. 2. Locations of exploratory borings were measured approximately by pacing from features shown on the site plan provided. 3. Elevations of exploratory borings were measured by instrument level and refer to a Bench Mark of the ground surface at existing water well shown on Figure 1 with an assumed elevation of 5046 feet from the contour plan provided. 4. The exploratory boring locations and elevations should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. 5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory boring logs represent the approximate boundaries between material types and transitions may be gradual. 6. No free water was encountered in the pits at the time of digging or in Profile Pit when checked 1 day later. Fluctuation in water level may occur with time. 7. Laboratory Testing Results: WC = Water Content (%) DO = Dry Density (pet) -200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve 109 007A 0~ Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical LEGEND AND NOTES Figure 3 Moisture Content = 15.5 percent Dry Density = 104 pet Sample of: Sandy Clay and Silt From: Pit 1 at 4 Feet 0 1 ~ r--1--- * ........... Compression c: ~ 0 upon 'iii I'.. wetting "' ~ 2 ,....., a. E 0 0 3 4 I . . . 0.1 1.0 10 100 . APPLIED PRESSURE -ksf Moisture Content = 10.0 percent Dry Density = 106 pet Sample of: Silty Sand From: Pit 1 at 8 Feet 0 ---.. 1 ,.... ~ Compression upon * wetting c: 2 ·~ ~ @ a. 3 E 0 ~ 0 4 "' 5 '\~ 0.1 1.0 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE -ksf 109 007A G~~ HAAWorth-Powl; techn~c:ol SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Figure 4 Moisture Content = 11.1 percent Dry Density = 104 pel Sample of: Very Sandy Clay and Silt From: Pit 2 at 3 Feet 1 0 1 -~ Compression 'upon 2 "\. wetting * ""' c ·~ ~ 3 E \ .. 0 () 4 5 i\ 1\ 6 0.1 1.0 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE • ksf 109 007A ~ SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Figure 5 HePWorth-Pawlak Geotechnlcol HYDROMETER ANALYSIS J SIEVE ANALYSIS .1. HR TIME READINGS I 0 ~~ ~~-1~ MIN. 60MIN:19MIN.4 MIN. 1 MIN. #200 U.S. STANDARD SERIES I #100 #50 #30 #16 #8 #4 CLEAR SQUARE OPENINGS / 3/8" 3/4" 1 1/Z' 3" 5" 6" 8" 100 10 90 20 80 30 70 C> 60 <.? w 40 z z iii ~ (/) ..: w 0.. "' 50 50 1-1-z z w w (.) (.) "' "' w w 40 0.. 0.. 60 70 30 80 20 90 10 100 0 001 .002 005 009 .D19 .037 ,074 .150 .300 600 1.18 2.36 4,75 95 19.0 37.5 76.2 152 203 12.5 127 DIAMETER OF PARTICLES IN MIULIMETERS ClAY I "" I V.I'IN'ii SAND I I FINE I MEDIW I COARSE tv, COARSE ""'' I Mf.Dl\JM """""-I LMG€ I COBelES GRAVEL 1 % SAND 42 % SILT 46 % CLAY 11 % LIQUID LIMIT % PLASTICITY INDEX % USDA SOIL TYPE: Loam FROM: Profile Pit from 4 Feet to 5 Feet 109 007A ~. HepWorth-Pawlak Geotechnical USDA GRADATION TEST RESULTS Figure 6 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. TABLE 1 Job No. 109 007 A SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS SAMPLE LOCATION NATURAL GRADATION AITERBERG LIMITS UNCONFINED MOISTURE NATURAL PERCENT COMPRESSIVE SO!L OR GRAVEL SAND PlASTIC Pit Depth CONTENT DRY DENSITY PASSING NO. UQUIDUMIT STRENGTH BEDROCK TYPE {%) (%) 200SIEVE INDEX (ft) (%) (pcf} (%) (%) (PSF) I 4 15.5 104 Sandy clay and silt 8 10.0 106 Silty sand 2 3 11.1 104 54 Very sandy clay and silt Profile 4 13.5 0 28 72 Sandy clay and silt (USDA-Loam) . HOLE NO. HOLE DEPTH (INCHES) 1 35 2 34 3 37 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. TABLE 2 PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS LENGTH OF WATER DEPTH WATER DEPTH INTERVAL AT START OF A TEND OF (MIN) INTERVAL INTERVAL (INCHES) (INCHES) 15 7 6 3/4 15 6 3/4 6 3/4 30 6 3/4 6 5/8 30 . 6 5/8 61/2 30 61/2 . 61/4 30 61/4 61/4 15 10 3/4 10 5/8 15 10 5/8 10 1/2 30 101/2 101/4 30 101/4 10 30 10 9 1/2 30 91/2 9 3/8 15 91/2 91/4 15 91/4 91/4 30 9 1/4 9 30 9 8 1/2 30 81/2 81/2 30 81/2 81/4 JOB NO. 109 007A DROP IN AVERAGE WATER LEVEL PERCOLATION (INCHES) RATE (MIN./INCH) 1/4 0 1/8 1/8 1/4 0 240 1/8 1/8 1/4 1/4 1/2 1/8 100 1/4 0 1/4 1/2 0 1/4 120 Note: Percolation test holes were hand dug in the bottom of backhoe pits and soaked on January 20, 2009. Percolation tests were conducted on January 21, 2009 by a representative of HP Geotech. The average percolation rates were based on the last three readings of each test. 11236 No. --------------------Assessor's Parcel No. 2409 "242 "00 "156 Date ___ 2_12_5_12_0_09 __ BUILDING PERMIT CARD Job Address ___ ..... 4 ..... 82..:..7_C_R..:..3:.....o_o.:...., _Pa_r_a_c_hu_t_e_· ____________________________ _ Owner ______ M_e_tc_a_lf_,_c_a_rl _________ Address 100 Van Hom P'chute Phone# 970-618-7387 Contractor Tapestry Builders Address POB 6065 B'Mesa Phone # 970-250-3449 ----Setbacks: Front _______ Rear _____ RH _____ LH _____ Zoning ____ _ s/f on crwsp w/ cov patios INSPECTIONS (continue on back) BUlL lNG PERMIT GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO !N~eECTION Wt_L( NOT BE MADE UNLESS THIS CARD IS POSTEll ON THE JOB Date Issued ?}....$::_Cfl,.,__,_ _______ Permit No. _ __.I_.I .... 2.,B"""-'(p¥-~~~"c&---- ?<~,: AGREEMENT hi_consideratiOn of the issuance of the permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with all laws and regulations -related to the zol)ing, location; construction and erection of the proposed structured fOr whi_C!i this permit is _granted, and further agrees that if the above said regulations are not fully complied with in the_:z;On'ing, location, erection and construction of the above described structure, the permit may then be revo~ecl btnotice from the County Building department and IMMEDIATELY BECOME NULL AND VOID>_,. u~~sJE-nn .· Cl:W_ap_W-\ (A\1 ~s_· ---- AddressorLegal Description ~922 f CJ2. -3C() __ 1~0!1::U . .!~---- ownerMf:tcD. ~. ~ ~ Contractor ~_$-{tk.< , Building Permit Type ~i)ct.l'-'--BV""''------------------------- This Card Must Be Posted So It Is Plainly Visible From The Street Until Final Inspection INSPECTION RECORD Footing Driveway b o:;,'i-b '7 ~ ur::u< oK. Foundation I Grouting &[~ Insulation . (; -4 v{!t{ .· ()/< ~ Underground Plumbing 7-?-il _ ClT c(-"1 Drywall 1-t(rf'( 0K -~ Rough Plumbing tj . b -;z. ~& 1 ;&1-nr. Ele~0~;~1ty State Inspector) (P,;o, to Fio.l) • e:f Rough Mechanical Septic Final & ":Z,Y -V'i jifm ~ f'..~d~·IPU 1>-?t-or Gas Piping FINAL I v 6 -;>, -z -t:R ~ /0 -[J-3-DC( ~ Electric Rough (by State Inspector) (,-?-2~0~ (You Must Call For Final Inspection) tp,;o,1L~ f..tr -fJ!t, ,, Notes Framing r -pf-or /07Y1 Nf£1/fL/K 0/fY/fV.C ;;_---- (to include Roof in place & Windows & Doors installed & Firestopping in place) THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE For Inspection Call 970-384-5003 Office 970-945-8212 108 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 DO NOT DESTROY THIS CARD ~::eROVE'?.-·~•09 y-E YJ.rm1f\h1lrN ~ --""'--"''--"-'"--'----P-R_O_T-EC_T_P:~~~- (DO NOT LAMINATE) COUNTY OF GARFIELD • BUILDING DEPARTMENT CORRECTION NOTICE 108 8th St., Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado Phone (970) 945-8212 Job located at ~f?;z7 Cci£3C::O Permit No. 1/a..Sb I have this day inspected this structure and these premises and found the following corrections needed: ;2) & $41--~~ .?;-&-e-. 36 /~ ~ c??w~l ¥can for Re-lnspection 0 $50.00 Re-lnspection Fee must be paid prior to Re-lnspection You are hereby notified that the above correction must be inspected before covering. When correction(s) have been made, call for inspection at 970-384-5003. Date ij-f?-o 9 20 --=--- Building Inspector ~~~~ Phone (970) 945-8212 COUNTY OF GARFIELD • BUILDIN CORRE ION Job located at _ _::r_:..Q_.:::Z-:::_7_:_-__ ___:::c:!-:0--'--::::: Permit No. _ ____!:C!__::::Z=-=-:3=-· _&_:_-______ --:._ I have this day inspected this structure and • premises and found the following corrections Fee must be . . b correction must b You are hereby not1f1ed that the a ove e •ns1aec:lteo before covering. • 11 tor inspection at When correct10n(s) have been made, ca &? Parcel Detail Page 1 of 4 Garfield County Assessor/Treasurer Parcel Detail Information AiiS~ssor!TreasllL(;LPropenxSsmu,:)l I A~~(')SS9LSJJQSet Q\lerY I AssessorS~les search C_!erk, lk Recmd<;rJ~,eq;ption Seatcli J>a,rcei \)<;tail I Yahg:Qetaii I Salesl2etllil I Resislen1ii!llC9m!11e!:l'ia!Jmpm\'ernsm1!::>etail l,an<i Detail I Pbotognmlls I Mill LeYY EeYenm,sPetaii I Tax Area II Account Number II Parcel Number II 2008 Mill Levy I I 027 II R040882 II 240924200156 II 35,007 I Owner Name and Mailing Address jMETCALF, CARL M II It 00 vAN HORN LANE jPARACHUTE, CO 81635 Assessor's Parcel Description (Not to be used as a legal description) ISECT,TWN,RNG:24-7-96 DESC: PARCEL j3, A PARCEL OF LAND IN THE Wl/2 IPRE:R005973 BK:ll76 PG:612 BK: 1176 IPG:611 BK:ll76PG:610BK:1176 IPG:609 BK:0973 PG:0786 BK:0601 IPG:0658 BK:0581 PG:0255 BK:0580 IPG:0066 BK:0569 PG:0664 BK:0569 IPG:0301 RECPT:746306 RECPT:738785 IRECPT:731826 RECPT:730575 IRECPT:730325 BK:l857 PG:665 jRECPT:709975 BK:l820 PG:920 IRECPT:702221 BK:l642 PG:598 IRECPT:664028 BK:l636 PG:915 IRECPT:662883 BK:1636 PG:913 IRECPT:662882 BK:l562 PG:8 http://www,garcoactcom/assessor/parcel,asp?ParcelNumber=240924200156 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 2/10/2009 Parcel Detail IRECPT:646783 BK:1562 PG:12 I IRECPT:646784 BK:1505 PG:107 I IRECPT:633987 BK: 1135 PG:820-823 I IRECPT:547474 BK:ll35 PG:818-819 I IRECPT:547473 BK:1135 PG:816-817 I IRECPT:547742 BK:1127 PG:710 I IRECPT: 544006 BK: 1126 PG:41 I IRECPT:544393 BK: 1126 PG:40 I IRECPT:544393 BK:0948 PG:OOI6 I Location I Physical Address: !!PARACHUTE I I Subdivision: I I Land Acres: 1135.02 I I Land Sq Ft: l!o I Section II Townshi~ II Ran~e I I 24 II 7 II 96 I 2008 Property Tax Valuation Information II Actual Value II Assessed Value I I I I Land: II 190,00011 Improvements: II oil Total: II 190,oooll Aclditinn<tl Value Qet<til Most Recent Sale Sale Date: llll/2/2004 Sale Price: 11450,000 Agc]jtipnal Sales[)(;t<til Basic Building Characteristics Number ofResidentialjo Buildings: _ Number ofCommf[ndllo http://www.garcoact.com/assessor/parcel.asp?ParceiNumber=240924200156 55,1001 ol 55,1001 Page2 of4 2/I0/2009 Parcel Detail II Buildings: II No Building Records Found Tax Information Tax Year II Transaction Type II Amount I 2008 II Tax Amount II $1,928.881 2007 II Tax Payment: Whole II ($2,005.76)1 2007 Tax Amount II $2,005.761 2006 Interest Payment II {$47.76)1 2006 Interest Charge II $47.761 2006 Tax Payment: Whole II ($1,591.84)1 2006 Tax Amount II $1,591.841 2005 II Interest Payment II ($63.82)j 2005 II Interest Charge II $63.821 2005 Tax Payment: Whole II ($1,595.52)1 2005 Tax Amount II $1,595.521 2004 Tax Payment: Whole II ($1,407.74)1 2004 Tax Amount II $1,407.741 2003 Tax Payment: Whole I ($5.00)1 2003 II Tax Payment: Whole ($8.30)1 2003 II Tax Amount $8.301 I 2003 II Tax Amount $s.ool Milll~vyRevenues Detail Top of Page AssessDri)ataqase Search Optiqns I Treasurer Database Search Opnon•; Clerk & Recorder Database Search Options Garlleld County Home Pal!;c . ..,. Page3 of4 The Garfield County Assessor and Treasurer's Offices make every effort to collect and maintain accurate data. However, Good Turns Software and the Garfield County Assessor and Treasurer's Offices are unable to warrant any of the information herein contained. Copyright© 2005 -2008 Good Turns Software. All Rights Reserved. http://www.garcoact.com/assessor/parcel.asp?Parce1Number=240924200 I 56 2110/2009