The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutApplication-PermitI Garfield County Building & Planning Department 108 8th Street, Suite #401 Glenwood Springs, Co. 81601 Office:970·945-8212 Fax: 970·384·3470 Inspection Line: 970·384·5003 Building Permit No. Parcel No: 2393-191-01-020 -----------------~--------------------------- Locality: Job Address: --~-----~-------~--·-- Owner: Forsman, Joe --~--·~--·-·"·-------·-···----~-------·-~--···-·--·~-----~···----'"~ Contractor: -------~---------------_ Gruen~feldhgan ------------------------- Fees: Plan Check: $ 1,312.06 Septic: ···~-----~-~--·-···-· -------------- Bldg Permit: $ 2,018.55 Other Fees: ---·----·---~--------~ Total Fees: $ 3,330.61 Clerk: Date: 3:ll:Qi ___ I 2 GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION I 08 8 111 Street. Suite 40 I, Glenwood Springs, Co 8\601 Phone: 970-945-8212/ Fax: 970-.184-3470 /Inspection Line: 970-384-5003 ~:.._\~~l_[Jj!,.'l<J·t:\)UI\h COtll 3 Lot No 20 Block No RCSfJK \ JJG fbf?C S~E~?J'tic~T PSPI:JJ GLEJV 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Class of Work: -~e\-v II Garage: -~ttached 12 Driveway Permit: F o Alteration o Addition Septic: o Detached o ISDS Owners valuation o!' Work: $ NOTICE !\It Ph< -f"lrrAt- Alt Ph3T?-6Sb5 A lt Ph: No. or Floors: 2 ~ommunit · v 'J Authoritv. This npplicntion for ll Building Permit 111\ISI be signed by the Owner oft he property. described abo1·c. or anllutlwrized agenl. If the sittnnture below is not that of the Owner. (I sepamte letter or mJthority, signed by the Owner. 111\ISI be pml·idcd With this ;\pplicnli(\1) Legal A<:cess. A Building Pennit cannot be issued l"'lth<Jil! prool' of lc~al nnd mlcquate i1cccs.~ to the pmpcrty li1r purposes of inspeCtion$ b~· the Building lkpnrtlllCI1t Othct· Permits. Multiple ~Cp<lmte permit~ lllil)" he required. (I) St<lte E!cctricnll'ern11L \21 County ISDS l'em111. 0 I another pcnnH lcquircd liH u~c on the property idcntllicd aho\'C. e.g. State or County Htghway/ Rond Access or n Stme Wastewatcr Discharge Permit Void J>ct·mit. i\ Building Permit becomes nul! and \·Oid if the work authorized is not commenced with Ill ISO days of tho.: date o!'issuano.:e nnd if" work is suspended orahnndnncd tOr a period of ISO days after commencement CI·:RTIFICA"fiON I hereby ccrtil)• thnt I have read this Application and 11mtthc inti:mmtion l.:ontaincd abo,·c is true and correct I undcr~tand that the l'luilding Department acccpl.> the .-\pplication. along with the pl;ms and specitlcations and other data submitted by me or on my bchillf(submittals), based upon my cenilkntion as to nccurllcy. Assun1ing completeness of the submiuals nnd approval or this Applicmion, n Building Permit will be issued ~rnnting pem1ission to me. <IS Owner, t<.) construct the structure(s) and facilities detailed on the submillals reviewed by the Building Depa11ment In consideration M the issuance of the Building Penn it, I agree that 1 and my agents will comply with pn>Yision~ of any !Cdcral. state or local law rcgulmin~ the work and the Gnr!leld Cmmty Building Code, ISDS regulations and applicable llmd usc regulntions (County Rcgul~tion(s)) I ncknowlcdgc thm the Building Pcnnitmay be suspended or rel'oked. upon notice l\·ot11thc County. if the locmion. construction or usc of the stn1ctnre(s) ~nd facility(ies), described ~bove. arc not in compliance with County Reguliltion(s) 01' any olhcr applicable law I hereby grant pe1111ission to the Building Dcpa111ncnt to enter the property, described above, to inspect the work 1 further ncknowlcdge I hat the is~uanec of 1he Building Penn it docs no I prevent the Building Official from: {I } requiring the correction of errors m the subminals, if any, diseo1·cred after issuance: or (2) Stopping construction m 11se or the structure{s) or f1lcility{ies) i r such is in violation of County Rcgul~tion{s) or <111y other applicable law Review of this .Application. including submil!als. and inspections of the work by the Building Depart mom do no1 constitute :m acceptm1ec of responsibility or liabihty by the County of errors, omissions or discrcp~ncics. Ao the Owno:r, ! al;know ledge thm responsibility for C(llllpliHn~c with !'cdernl. stnte and local laws and County Rcl:(ulations rest with me a11d my authorized agents, including without !imitation my architect dcsi~l~inecr and/ or b~tilder ?R~~JI''liHA;::;;'!;;;TIIf NOrtC!C & ;)'~'f~MlOVI ···-. OWNlcKS SIGNA TliRE DATE STAFF USE ONLY Special Conditions: Adjusted Valuation: Plan Ched: Fee: Permit Fcc: Manu home Fcc: Mise Fees: Z6257'!-4o I'P12-.()tiJ g,(Jf8,55 ISDS Fee: Total Fees: Fees Paid: Balance l)uc: ffi5~" ISDS No & Issued Oate: 10/A ~'?!'PO. (p ( {3C:,3.b;?--> ~o/o'7.1F1 ~WlW\ • Setbacks: OCC G•·oup: Const Type: Zoning: .p\)\/ Bl I)G DEPT: p~~· A!~~\\,~~~ 1_7/[t)/Oi ~lro[<?J DATE APPROVAL -1, ' DATE The following items are required by Garfield County for a final Inspection: I) A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector. 2) Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department and posted at the structure and where readily visible from access road. 3) A finished roof; a lockable building; completed exterior siding; exterior doors and windows installed; a complete kitchen with cabinets, sink with hot & cold running water, non-absorbent kitchen floor covering, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove and refrigerator; all necessary plumbing. 4) All bathrooms must be complete, with washbowl, tub or shower, toilet, hot and cold running water, non-absorbent floors, walls finished, and privacy door. 5) Steps over three (3) risers, outside or inside must be must have handrails. Balconies and decks over 30" high must be constructed to all IBC and IRC requirements including guardrails. 6) Outside grading completed so that water slopes away fl·om the building; 7) Exceptions to the outside steps, decks, grading may be made upon the demonstration of extenuating circumstances., i.e. weather. Under such circumstances A Certificate of Occupancy may be issued conditionally. 8) A final inspection sign off by the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department for driveway installation, where applicable; as well as any final sign off by the Fire District, and/or State Agencies where applicable. A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (C.O.) WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. A C.O. MAY TAKE UP TO 5 BUSINESS DAYS TO BE PROCESSED AND ISSUED. OWNER CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A C.O. IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATING PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET. I understand and agree to abide by the above conditions for occupancy, use and the issuance of a C.O. for the building identified in the Building Permit. oV\fNERSSiG ATURE DATE Bappl icationdecem bcr2007 VALUATION FEE DETERMINATION Applicant Address Date .;17oe::'F;..:o~rs~m:;an!!!-,...,,.--:-:---~--Subdivision ..;:0..:,07:':4':'A~n"'g"'le:;:;r"', C::::ar::.b::::o::.n:::da:::l.::.e _____ Lot/Biock .:;3::.;il::.0"'/2::.0.::.09::__ _________ Contractor Finished (Livable Area): Main Upper Lower Other Total Basement: Unfinished Square Feet Valuation Conversion of Unfinished to Finished Total Garage: Carport Total Crawl Space Total Decks/ Patios Total Valuation Valuation Valuation Covered Open Valuation Type of Construction: Occnpancy: Valuation Total Valuation 2352 sq.ft sq.ft 1028 sq.ft sq.ft X $7 4.68 3380 sq.lt 352 sq.ftX $41.00 = sq.ft X $33.68 582 sq.ftX $18.00"' sq.ft X $12.00 sq.ft X $9.00 217 sq.ftX $24.00: sq.ft X $12.00 Commercial sf X sf X sf X sf X sf X sf X Roaring Fork Mesa at Aspen Glen 252,418.40 14,432.00 10,476.00 0.00 5,208.00 0.00 282,534.40 Plans must include a floor plan, a concrete tooting and foundation plan, elevations all sides with decks, balcony, steps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the finish grade line and original grade. A section showing in detail, t1·om the bottom of the footing to the top of the roof, including re-bar, anchor bolts, pressure treated plates, floor joists, wall studs and spacing, insulation, sheeting, house-rap, (which is required), siding or any approved building material. Engineered foundations may be required. A window schedule. A door schedule. A floor framing plan, a roof framing plan, roof must be designed to withstand a 40 pound per square foot up to 7,000 feet in elevation, a 90 M.P.H. wind speed, wind exposure B or C, and a 36 inch frost depth. All sheets to be identified by number and indexed. All of the above requirements must be met or your plans will be returned. All plans submitted must be incompliance with the 2003 IRC. I. Is a site plan included that identifies the location of the proposed structure or addition and distances. to the property lines from each corner of the proposed structure(s) pt·epared by a licensed surveyor and has the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing? Propetiies with slopes of 30% or greater must be shown on the site plan. (NOTE Section: 106.2) Any site plan for the placement of any portion of a structure within 50 ft. of a property line and not within a previously surveyed building envelope on a subdivision final plat shall be prepared by a licensed surveyor and have the surveyor's signature and professional stamp on the drawing. Any structure to be built within a building envelope of a lot shown on a recorded subdivision plat shall include a copy of the building envelope as it is shown on the tina! plat with the proposed structure located within the envelope. Yes ')L 2. Does the site plan also include any other buildings on the property, setback easements and utility easements? Please refer to Section 5.05.03 in the Garfield County Zoning Resolution if the property you are applying for a building permit on is located on a corner lot. Special setbacks do apply. Yes_ )L-__ 3. Does the site plan include when applicable the location of the I.S.D.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System) and the distances to the property lines, wells (on subject property and adjacent properties), streams or water courses? Yes·£ 4. Does the site plan indicate the location and direction of the County or private road accessing the property? Yes ...J- 2 5. Have you provided any RESOLUTIONS and/ or LAND USE PERMIT(S) associated with this propetiy? Yes if Yes please provide a COPY. No_~---- 6. Are you aware that prior to submittal of a building permit application you are required to show proof of a legal and adequate access to the site? This may include (but is not limited to) proof of your right to use a private easement/right of way; A County Road and Bridge permit; a Colorado Dept. of Highway Permit, including a Notice to Proceed; a permit from the federal government or any combination. You can contact the Road & Bridge Department at 625-8601. See phone book for other agencies Yes ~ 7. Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all reinforcing steel in accordance with the IRC or per stamped engineered design? Yes 'i-- 8. Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl spaces and the clearances required between wood and earth? Yes ·,L No --- 9. Do the plans indicate the size and location of ventilation openings for the attic, roofjoist spaces and soffits? ~ No I 0. Do the plans include design loads as required by Garfield County for roof snow loads, (a minimum of 40 pounds per square foot up to & including 7,000 feet above sea level), floor loads and wind loads? Yes~--- II. Does the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor, and roof constructi~1? Yes ----· 12. Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists, wall studs, ceiling joists, roof rafte~ or joists or trusses? Yes ·------ 13. Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method of positive connection of all columns and beams? Yes 0 ·---- \4. Does the elevation plan indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the undisturbed grade to the midpoint between the ridge and eave of a gable or shed roof or the top of a flat roof? (Building height measurement usually not to exceed 25 feet) Yes X... ·---- 3 I 5. Does the plan include any stove or zero clearance fireplace planned for installation including make and model and Colorado Phase II certifications or phase II EPA certification? Yes No ______ _ I 6. Does the plan include a masonry fireplace including a fireplace section indicating design to comply with the IRC? Yes _____ No Y- 17. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that egress/rescue windows from sleeping rooms and/or basements comply with the requirements of the IRC? Yes -,L 18. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that windows provide natural light and ventilation for all habitable rooms~ Yes lC I 9. Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass doors, glazing immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as a walking surface; sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub enclosures and specify safety glazing for these areas? Yes lC- 20. Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces, boilers and water heaters indicated on the plan? Yes L 2 I. Do you understand that if you are building on a parcel of land created by the exemption process or the subdivisi.on process, are building plans in compliance with all plat notes and/or covenants? Yes '1- 22. Do you understand that if you belong to a Homeowners Association (HOA), it is your responsibility to obtain written permission from the association, if required by that association, prior to submitting an application for a building permit? The building permit application will be accepted without it, but you run the risk of the HOA bringing action to enforce the covenants, which can result in revocation of permit issued. Additionally, your Plan Review fee is not refundable if the plans have been reviewed by the Building Department prior to any action by the HOA that requires either revocation or substantial modification of the plans. Yes I ·"""'--- 23. Will this be the only residential structure on the parcel? Yes 'I-lfno-Exp\ain: _______ _ 24. Have two (2) complete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the application" Yes-./=----- 4 25. Do you understand that the minimum dimension a home can be on a lot is 20ft. wide and 20ft. long? Yes )'!. 26. Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other construction code requirements? Yes V. 27. Do your plans comply with all zoning rules and regulations in the County related to your properties zone dis\!;!E!? Yes ______ _ 28. Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a final inspection by the Garfield County Building Department? Yes )(_ 29. Do you understand that approval for design and/or construction changes are required prior to the application of these changes? Yes_:!-___ _ 30. Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a "Plan Review" fee from you at the time of application submittal and that you will be required to pay the "Permit Fee" as well as any "Road Impact" or "Septic System" fees required, at the time you pick up your building permit? Yes ~· 31. Are you aware that you must call in for an inspection by 3:30 the business day before the requested inspection in order to receive it the following business day? Inspections will be made from 7:30a.m. to 3:30 p.m. Monday through Friday. Inspections are to be called in to 384-5003. Yes :X:. 32. Are you aware that requesting inspections on work that is not ready or not accessible will result in a $50.00 re-inspection fee? Yes f-, ___ _ 33. Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the IRC including approval on a final inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy and occupancy of the building? Yes )<: 5 34. Are you aware that the Permit Application must be signed by the Owner or a written authority being given for an Agent and that the party responsible for the project must comply with the IRC? Yes '>L· 35. Do you understand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed Electrician and Plumber to perfonn installations and hookups, unless you as the homeowner are performing the work? The license number of the person performing the work will be required at time of applicable inspection. Yes Y 36. Are you aware, that on the front of the Building Permit Application you will need to fill in the Parcel/Schedule Number for the lot you are applying for this permit on prior to submittal of a building permit application? Your attention in this is appreciated. y 37. Do you know that the local fire district may require you to submit plans for their review of fire safety issues? Yes )L (please check with the building department about this requirement) 38. Do you understand that if you are planning on doing any excavating or grading to the property prior to issuance of a building permit that you will be required to obtain a grading permit? Yes '>L.- 39 . Are you aware that if you will be connecting to a public water and/or sewer system, that the tap fees have to be paid and the connections inspected by the service provider prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy? Yes--'=---- 40. If you anticipate obtaining a water tap H·om the City of Rifle, please provide a letter indicating that the City will provide water service. No building permit application will be accepted without such a letter. Yes I hereby acknowledge that I have read, understand and answered these questions to the best of c-~ Signature of Owner Date Phone: 319-65bS (days); _Cf_,_,b"'-3-'--4'__,_, 9_1_9_· _(evenings) 6 Project Name: Foi2S VlfH0 I2£S\tf)JC£ Project Address: CD/4 A)JG!££ ASPf}) Q£}./ Notes: If any required information is missing delays in issuing the permit are to be expected. Work may not proceed without the issuance of a permit. If it is determined by the Building Offtcial that additional information is necessary to review the application and plans to determine minimum compliance with the adopted codes, the application may be placed behind more recent applications for building permits in the review process and not reviewed until required information has been provided and the application rotates again to first position for review, delay in issuance of the permit or delay in proceeding with construction. bpminreqsfJan2009 7 FROM :FORSMAN ---/t; ' FAX NO. :8067959123 .,....h~;j~dd atf,-~,_,;, Feb. 27 2009 11: 34RM P2 , P~.u a.u.Z-1~~ '!(]~ ~#~zrd a~o ~ A!!'J#l,.t~-J!!'!l':' ... ~ .a..,or~??; 7 (;"-~~7~¢~ ~..~~ ,-?e.. Lcrr ~cj-e~~'J cn:.i ~ ~ a)r"V ~~~-· c5f,CJ 9 9~ ~~ 6-f. L u/!>6.,c.J: 7 :X. "79-i'c-;(3 / 11252 No. ________________ __ Assessor's Parcel No. 2393-191-01-020 Date _____ 3_11_1_12_0_09 __ _ BUILDING PERMIT CARD JobAddress ----~00~7~4~A~n~g~le~r~,_C~ar_b~o_n~da~l~e __ (~R_o_a_ri_ng~F_o_rk_M_e_s_a~@~A_s~p_e_n_G_Ie_n~,_L_o_t2_0~) ______________ _ Owner Forsman, Joe Address 6900 S. Quaker-TX Phone # 806-794-2888 Contractor ______ G __ ru_e_n~ef_e_ld_t~, D_a_n __ ~-----Address ___ bo_x_19_1_0,_B_as_a_lt _______ Phone. # 379-6565 Setbacks: Front _________ Rear ______ RH ______ LH _________ Zoning ______ _ s/f on partial unf base w/cov patio & att garage Soils Test /IV. 1!LI£ ~Footing g_ ..:l. f-~ Rn1 ;x Foundation 4·-z-o9 '7?t/<.J Grout ____________ ~.-~~~~~ Underground Plumbin.g 4 .. ?-:;_,<? ,7?~ Rough Plumbing b-8 -o 7' 7?U/ Framing (k·-F-c;? ~~ Insulation k -'T-o 2 ¢4-< Roofing ~ , Drywall 6.-7t-e:> <;? ~ Ga~Piping k-3-o? * t"APs 4--7-e>"r ~~ 1'10A/t'l 4--/'3-.o9 'y!'W, INSPECTIONS 3!9--f-:J-63 Weatherproofing _____________________ _ Mechanicai __________ --;;< __ --:----:::;:-,~--- Eiectrical Rough (State) &;;. "'~<f--09' Electrical Final (State) _________ ---::---::,...-- Final gy9-Cfi /Checklist Com leted?~ Certificate Occup nc # .. ~1 '--'~· ~,___,_,"""""" ____ _ Date S Le Septic System # -'-'""-'-"-L:..::....!..,!_ __________ _ Date -----------------------Final ______________________ __ Other ____________________________ __ NOTES (continue on back) UILDING PERMIT GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO INSPECTION WILL NOT BE MADE UNLESS THiS CARD IS POSTED ON THE JOB Date Issued :> .. !)"'(},__._<\ ___ PermitNo._1.:_\~~'-=-:A-=----- AGREEMENT In consideration of the issuance of the permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with all laws and regulations related to the zoning, locationi construction and erection of the proposed structured for which this permit is granted, and further agrees that if the above said regulations are not fully complied with in the zoning, location, erection and construction of the above described structure, the permit may then be revoked by notice from the County Building department and IMMEDIATELY BECOME NULL AND VOID. Use_<E2,'fON'PM2:118LIJNFINI~~W/CfN1?AiJ"et~~ AddressorLegaiDescription OOjJ.f AtJ[::d • .EJ2 ~1£ Owner j';prJSMAN 1 { }Qe: Building PermitType 1l.6'S.\DENTJ A-L This Card Must Be Posted So It Is Plainly Visible From The Street Until Final Inspection INSPECTION RECORD F~~tinQ --~··· . Drive_way _ --- ~~').~-0"1 rOm Foundation I Grouting 4--L -t/ 1' -??-J, Insulation &; -';7-O"t L/_ U: ;/ADS-"/--7-o'l' f?'PL/ . /Vlcll!o ;=Looli? <{--/3-o/-r:L-</ Underground Plumbing f-9-c:>?' ;74=2 Drywall if-I z-o /" <;?.0! Rough Plumbing f;--3"-o( c;z_u; Eie<trk ~7-(by 6;e lnsrprJo (Prior to Final) ~ Rough Mechanical ?--e; v? "7'«./ Septic Final r/11 Gas Piping t?>-:5-c:>?' E!NAl. 9/. / J! Q/AA ;;;.-/'lo;-o?'" ~ 8'-/'1-09 ~;?//~ Electflc ~j2h (""}J;e Ins~~~ (You Must Call For Final Inspection) (Prior to Framing) r Notes Framing 6~8-0'7 y.?-J (to include Roof in place & Windows & Doors installed & Firestopping in place) APPROVED Date THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE For Inspection Call970-384-5003 Office 970-945-8212 108 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 DO NOT DESTROY THIS CARD '3-lt-oqROTECT P:~f.t)~Xl~AGE (DO NOT LAMINATE) COUNTY OF GARFIELD -BUILDING DEPARTMENT CORRECTION NOTICE 108 8th St., Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado Phone {970) 945-8212 Job located at 007'!-ANG-c£X::. Permit No. 1/Z s-Z- ' I have this day inspected this structure and these premises and found the following corrections needed: ?c:11 for Re-lnspection 0 $50.00 Re-lnspection Fee must be paid prior to Re-lnspection You are hereby notified that the above correction must be inspected before covering. When correction(s) have been made, call for inspection at 970-384-5003. Dom 6-~ "~ Building Inspector%~?: Phone (970) 945-8212 - COUNTY OF GARFIELD -BUILDING DEPARTMENT CORRECTION NOTICE 108 8th St., Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado Phone {970) 945-8212 Job located at 0 0 7 tf-AA'(GL:.£' K Permit No. II zs-"2..... I have this day inspected this structure and these premises and found the following corrections needed: /ffA:s!i£1!. 73A 77/ 121f41/i/ z;i::.5·( L/<:"ll.K:S,.. . /1/iCeP Mt:J/K:.C.//V/C. st-;z1Cv;t od G-As L/A/1£ z/./7/t:.i(LA./G /it<~r'CAc!L ,/£itftG hA& oR CAt!'C:.K AicteC5 J?odz:/ /t/1££.0 /ZC.-/C:C" //tis£ ~or Re-lnspection /-..,e:A!< /1£/r/ £) //(/ G- 0 $50.00 Re-lnspection Fee must be paid prior to Re-lnspection You are hereby notified that the above correction must be inspected before covering. When correction(s) have been made, call for inspection at 970-384-5003. Building Inspector ___,;:_~~~~:U~~~~"=:==-~- Phone (970) 945-8212 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL SUBSOIL STUDY Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. 5020 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Phone' 970-945-7988 Fa"' 970-945-8454 email: hpgeo@hpgeoteCh.com FOR FOUNDATION DESIGN PROPOSED RESIDENCE LOT M-20, ROARING FORK MESA AT ASPEN GLEN GOLDEN STONE GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO JOB NO. 109 006A JANUARY 23,2009 PREPARED FOR: GRUENFELDT CONSTRUCTION ATTN: DAN GRUENFELDT P.O. BOX 1910 BASALT, COLORADO 81621 Parker 303-841-7119 o Colorado Springs 719-633-5562 ° Silverthorne 970-468-1989 TABLE OF CONTENTS PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY ........................................................................ - I - PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ................................................................................. - I - SITE CONDITIONS ................................................................................................... -2- SUBSIDENCE POTENTIAL ..................................................................................... -2- FIELD EXPLORATION ............................................................................................ -3- SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS .................................................................................. -3- FOUNDATION BEARING CONDITIONS ............................................................... -4- DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................. -4- FOUNDATIONS .................................................................................................... -4- FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS ......................................................... -5- FLOOR SLABS ...................................................................................................... - 6 - UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM ...................................................................................... - 7 - SURFACE DRAINAGE ......................................................................................... -7- LIMITATIONS .......................................................................................................... -8- REFERENCES ........................................................................................................... - 9 - FIGURE I -LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIGURE 2-LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIGURE 3 -LEGEND AND NOTES TABLE 1-SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY This report presents the results of a subsoil study for a proposed residence to be located on Lot M-20, Roaring Fork Mesa at Aspen Glen, Golden Stone, Garfield County, Colorado. The project site is shown on Figure 1. The purpose of the study was to develop reconunendations for the foundation design. The study was conducted in accordance with our proposal for geotechnical engineering services to Gruenfeldt Construction dated January 5, 2009. Chen-Northern, Inc. (1991 and 1993) previously conducted a preliminary geotechnical engineering study for development of Aspen Glen and a geotechnical engineering study for the preliminary plat design. Information from those studies has been considered in preparation of this report. A field exploration program consisting of exploratory borings was conducted to obtain information on the subsurface conditions. Samples of the subsoils obtained during the field exploration were tested in the laboratory to determine their classification, and other engineering characteristics. The results of the field exploration and laboratory testing were analyzed to develop reconunendations for foundation types, depths and allowable pressures for the proposed building foundation. This report summarizes the data obtained during this study and presents our conclusions, design recommendations and other geotechnical engineering considerations based on the proposed construction and the subsurface conditions encountered. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION The residence will be a two story wood frame construction over a walkout basement level located on the lot as shown on Figure 1. Ground floors will be slab-on-grade. Grading for the structure is assumed to be relatively minor with cut depths between about 3 to 8 feet. We assume relatively light foundation loadings, typical of the proposed type of construction. Ifbuilding loadings, location or grading plans change significantly from those described above, we should be notified to re-evaluate the recommendations contained in this report. Job No. I 09 006A -2- SITE CONDITIONS The lot was vacant at the time of our field exploration and covered with about I Y, feet of snow. The ground surface is relatively flat with a strong slope down to the east at grades of about 7 to 8%. Elevation difference across the proposed building is about 5 feet. There is an existing drainage ditch and easement along the north side of the lot. Vegetation consists of grass and weeds. There are scattered cobbles and boulders on the ground surface. SUBSIDENCE POTENTIAL Bedrock of the Pennsylvanian age Eagle Valley Evaporite underlies the Aspen Glen development. These rocks are a sequence of gypsiferous shale, fine-grained sandstone/siltstone and limestone with some massive beds of gypsum. There is a possibility that massive gypsum deposits associated with the Eagle Valley Evaporite underlie portions of the lot. Dissolution of the gypsum under certain conditions can cause sinkholes to develop and can produce areas oflocalized subsidence. During previous studies in the area, several broad subsidence areas and smaller size sinkholes were observed scattered throughout the Aspen Glen development. These sinkholes were primarily located to the east of the Roaring Fork River and appeared similar to others associated with the Eagle Valley Evaporite in areas of the Roaring Fork River valley. Sinkholes were not observed in the immediate area of the subject lot. There is a mapped sinkhole about 1,500 feet south of this lot near County Road 109. No evidence of cavities was encountered in the subsurface materials; however, the exploratory borings were relatively shallow, for foundation design only. Based on our present knowledge of the subsurface conditions at the site, it cannot be said for certain that sinkholes will not develop. The risk of future ground subsidence on Lot M-20 throughout the service life of the proposed residence, in our opinion, is low; however, the owner should be made aware of the potential for sinkhole development. If further investigation of possible cavities in the bedrock below the site is desired, we should be contacted. Job No. 109 006A ~tech - 3 - FIELD EXPLORATION The field exploration for the project was conducted on January 15, 2009. Two exploratory borings were drilled at the locations shown on Figure 1 to evaluate the subsurface conditions. The borings were advanced with 4 inch diameter continuous flight augers powered by a truck-mounted CME-45B drill rig. Snow removal was done by the client to provide access to the boring locations for the drill rig. The borings were logged by a representative ofHepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. Samples of the subsoils were taken with a I o/s inch I. D. spoon sampler. The sampler was driven into the subsoils at various depths with blows from a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches. This test is similar to the standard penetration test described by ASTM Method D-1586. The penetration resistance values are an indication of the relative density or consistency of the subsoils. Depths at which the samples were taken and the penetration resistance values are shown on the Logs of Exploratory Borings, Figure 2. The samples were returned to our laboratory for review by the project engineer and testing. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Graphic logs of the subsurface conditions encountered at the site are shown on Figure 2. The subsoils, below about Y, foot of organic topsoil, consisted of medium dense, silty clayey sandy gravel with cobbles. The silty clayey sandy gravel with cobble soils extended down to the depth drilled of 5 feet in Boring 1 and to a depth of about 8 feet in Boring 2 where relatively dense, slightly silty sandy gravel and cobbles with boulders was encountered down to the drilled depth of II feet. Drilling in the granular soils with auger equipment was difficult due to the cobbles and boulders and drilling refusal was encountered in the deposits. Laboratory testing performed on samples obtained from the borings included natural moisture content and percent finer than sand size gradation analyses. The laboratory testing is summarized in Table I. Job No. I 09 006A ~tech -4- No free water was encountered in the borings at the time of drilling or when checked 1 day later and the subsoils were slightly moist. FOUNDATION BEARING CONDITIONS The silty clayey gravel with cobble soils may be somewhat compressible and the underlying sandy gravel and cobble soils are relatively incompressible under light to moderate foundation loadings. It should be feasible to support the proposed residence on a spread footing foundation system with some risk of differential settlement. The risk of differential settlement is if the footings transition between the upper silty clayey gravel with cobble soils and the sandy gravel and cobbles soils, and especially if the upper bearing soils become wetted. Placing the footings entirely on the underlying sandy gravel and cobble soils would provide a low risk of differential settlement. DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS FOUNDATIONS Considering the subsurface conditions encountered in the exploratory borings and the nature of the proposed construction, we recommend the building be founded with spread footings bearing on the natural soils. The design and construction criteria presented below should be observed for a spread footing foundation system. 1) Footings placed on the undisturbed natural soils should be designed for an allowable bearing pressure of2,500 ps[ Based on experience, we expect settlement of footings designed and constructed as discussed in this section will be about I inch. Some additional settlement up to about Y, inch could occur if the upper bearing soils become wetted. 2) The footings should have a minimum width of 18 inches for continuous walls and 2 feet for isolated pads. 3) Exterior footings and footings beneath unheated areas should be provided with adequate soil cover above their bearing elevation for frost protection. Job No. 109 006A ~tech -5- Placement offoundations at least 36 inches below exterior grade is typically used in this area. 4) Continuous foundation walls should be well reinforced top and bottom to span local anomalies and better withstand the effects of some differential settlement. Foundation walls acting as retaining structures should also be designed to resist lateral earth pressures as discussed in the "Foundation and Retaining Walls" section of this report. 5) Any existing fill, topsoil and loose or disturbed soils should be removed and the footing bearing level extended down to the undisturbed natural soils. The exposed soils in footing area should then be moistened and compacted. 6) A representative of the geotechnical engineer should observe all footing excavations prior to concrete placement to evaluate bearing conditions. FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS Foundation walls and retaining structures which are laterally supported and can be expected to undergo only a slight amount of deflection should be designed for a lateral earth pressure computed on the basis of an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 50 pcf for backfill consisting of the on-site soils. Cantilevered retaining structures which are separate from the residence and can be expected to deflect sufficiently to mobilize the full active earth pressure condition should be designed for a lateral earth pressure computed on the basis of an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 45 pcf for backfill consisting of the on-site soils. All foundation and retaining structures should be designed for appropriate hydrostatic and surcharge pressures such as adjacent footings, traffic, construction materials and equipment. The pressures recommended above assume drained conditions behind the walls and a horizontal backfill surface. The buildup of water behind a wall or an upward sloping backfill surface will increase the lateral pressure imposed on a foundation wall or retaining structure. An underdrain should be provided to prevent hydrostatic pressure buildup behind walls. Job No. I 09 006A ~tech -6- Backfill should be placed in uniform lifts and compacted to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content slightly above optimum. Backfill in pavement and walkway areas should be compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density. Care should be taken not to overcompact the backfill or use large equipment near the wall, since this could cause excessive lateral pressure on the wall. Some settlement of deep foundation wall backfill should be expected, even if the material is placed correctly, and could result in distress to facilities constructed on the backfill. Compacting the granular backfill soils higher density such as 98% of the maximum standard Proctor density could be done to help reduce the settlement potential. The lateral resistance of foundation or retaining wall footings will be a combination of the sliding resistance ofthe footing on the foundation materials and passive earth pressure against the side of the footing. Resistance to sliding at the bottoms of the footings can be calculated based on a coefficient of friction of0.45. Passive pressure of compacted backfill against the sides of the footings can be calculated using an equivalent fluid unit weight of350 pc£ The coefficient of friction and passive pressure values recommended above assume ultimate soil strength. Suitable factors of safety should be included in the design to limit the strain which will occur at the ultimate strength, particularly in the case of passive resistance. Fill placed against the sides of the footings to resist lateral loads should be a granular material compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. FLOOR SLABS The natural on-site soils, exclusive of topsoil, are suitable to support lightly loaded slab- on-grade construction. To reduce the effects of some differential movement, floor slabs should be separated from all bearing walls and columns with expansion joints which allow unrestrained vertical movement. Floor slab control joints should be used to reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking. The requirements for joint spacing and slab reinforcement should be established by the designer based on experience and the intended slab use. A minimum 4 inch layer of free-draining gravel should be placed beneath basement level slabs to facilitate drainage. This material should consist of minus 2 inch Job No. !09 006A ~tech -7- aggregate with at least 50% retained on the No. 4 sieve and less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve. All fill materials for support of floor slabs should be compacted to at least 95% of maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Required fill can consist of the on-site granular soils devoid of vegetation, topsoil and oversized rocks. UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM Although free water was not encountered during our exploration, it has been our experience in the area that local perched groundwater can develop during times of heavy precipitation or seasonal runoff. Frozen ground during spring runoff can also create a perched condition. We recommend below-grade construction, such as retaining walls and basement areas, be protected from wetting and hydrostatic pressure buildup by an underdrain system. The drains should consist of drainpipe placed in the bottom of the wall backfill surrounded above the invert level with free-draining granular material. The drain should be placed at each level of excavation and at least I foot below lowest adjacent finish grade and sloped at a minimum I% to a suitable gravity outlet. Free-draining granular material used in the underdrain system should contain less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve, less than 50% passing the No.4 sieve and have a maximum size of2 inches. The drain gravel backfill should be at least 1 \1, feet deep. Drywells based in the deeper alluvial gravel and cobble soils may be feasible at this site. SURFACE DRAINAGE Positive surface drainage is an important aspect of the project to prevent wetting below the building. The following drainage precautions should be observed during construction and maintained at all times after the residence has been completed: 1) Inundation of the foundation excavations and underslab areas should be avoided during construction. 2) Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density in Job No. I 09 006A -8- pavement and slab areas and to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density in landscape areas. 3) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions. We recommend a minimum slope of 6 inches in the first I 0 feet in unpaved areas and a minimum slope of3 inches in the first I 0 feet in paved areas. Free-draining wall backfill should be capped with about 2 feet of the on- site finer graded soils to reduce surface water infiltration. 4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill. 5) Irrigation sprinkler heads and landscaping which requires regular heavy irrigation, such as sod, should be located at least 5 feet from foundation walls. LIMITATIONS This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no warranty either express or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the exploratory borings drilled at the locations indicated on Figure I, the proposed type of construction and our experience in the area. Our services do not include determining the presence, prevention or possibility of mold or other biological contaminants (MOBC) developing in the future. If the client is concerned about MOBC, then a professional in this special field of practice should be consulted. Our findings include interpolation and extrapolation of the subsurface conditions identified at the exploratory borings and variations in the subsurface conditions may not become evident until excavation is performed. If conditions encountered during construction appear different from those described in this report, we should be notified so that re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes. We are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. As the project evolves, we should provide continued consultation and field services during Job No. 109 006A -9- construction to review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations, and to verifY that the reconnnendations have been appropriately interpreted. Significant design changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommendations presented herein. We recommend on-site observation of excavations and foundation bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a representative of the geotechnical engmeer. Respectfully Submitted, Reviewed by: Daniel E. Hardin, P.E. DAY/vam REFERENCES Chen-Northern, 1991, Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Study, Proposed Aspen Glen Development, along the Roaring Fork River between Glenwood Springs and Carbondale, Garfield County, Colorado: Prepared for the Aspen Glen Company, Aspen, Colorado (December 20, 1981, Job No. 4 112 92). Chen-Northern, 1993, Geotechnical Engineering Study, for Preliminary Plat Design Proposed Aspen Glen Development, Ga~field County, Colorado: Prepared for the Aspen Glen Company, Aspen, Colorado (May 28, 1993, Job No.4 112 92). Job No. I 09 006A ---------- -----NVELOP~ BUILDING E LOT20 \ -- 1Z APPRO !MATE SCALE w 0 ..... (/) 1" = 25' --PROPOSED- RESIDENCE -+---.I_... z w 0 .....1 - ---- LOT21 -!:"il"~.--•-109006A ~ - e BORING 1 0 (.9 _ _/- LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS HEPWORTH-PA'M.AK GEOTECHNICAL - LOT13 -- -- Figure 1 6055 6050 6045 (j) Q) lL ' c: 0 ~ iD 6040 [jJ 6035 6030 109 006A BORING 1 ELEV.=6051' 50/1 T 50/6 WC=1.9 -200=18 BORING2 ELEV.=6046' 22/12 WC=5.0 -200=24 15/12 53/12 Note: Explanation of symbols is shown on Figure 3. ~£tech LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS He worth-Powlok Geotechnical 6055 6050 6045 (j) Q) lL c: 0 m 6040 iii [jJ 6035 6030 Figure 2 LEGEND: TOPSOIL; organic sandy silty clay, medium stiff, slightly moist, reddish brown. GRAVEL (GM-GC); with cobbles, possible small boulders, silty, clayey, sandy, medium dense,slightly moist, red-brown, rocks are primarily subangular. GRAVEL AND COBBLES (GM-GP); with boulders, sandy, slightly silty, dense to very dense, slightly moist, brown, rocks are primarily subrounded to rounded. 22/12 T NOTES: Drive sample; standard penetration test (SPT), 1 3/8 inch I. D. split spoon sample, ASTM D-1586. Drive sample blow count; indicates that 22 blows of a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches were required to drive the California or SPT sampler 1 2 inches. Practical drilling refusal. Where shown above bottom of log, indicates that multiple attempts were made to advance the boring. 1. Exploratory borings were drilled on January 1 5, 2009 with 4-inch diameter continuous flight power auger. 2. Locations of exploratory borings were measured approximately by pacing from features shown on the site plan provided. 3. Elevations of exploratory borings were approximated from contours on the site plan provided and checked by instrument level. 4. The exploratory boring locations and elevations should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. 5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory boring logs represent the approximate boundaries between material types and transitions may be gradual. 6. No free water was encountered in the borings at the time of drilling or when checked 1 day later. Fluctuation in water level may occur with time. 7. Laboratory Testing Results: WC = Water Content{%) -200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve c~~ H_~pWorth-Pawlok Geotechnical Figure 3 LEGEND AND NOTES 109 006A HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. TABLE 1 Job No. 109 006A SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS SAMPLE LOCATION NATURAL NATURAL GRADATION PERCENT ATTERBERG LIMITS UNCONFINED MOISTURE DRY GRAVEL SAND PASSING LIQUID PLASTIC COMPRESSIVE SOIL OR BORING DEPTH CONTENT DENSITY NO. 200 STRENGTH BEDROCK TYPE (%) (%) LIMIT INDEX SIEVE (It) (%) (pcf) (%) {%) (PSF) 1 4 1.9 18 Silty clayey sandy gravel 2 2 5.0 24 Silty clayey sandy gravel 9709458il54 ~tech H EPWOR.rH ·PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL March 23, 2009 Gruenefe!dt Construction Attn: Dan GnJenefeldt P.O. Box 1910 Basalt, Colorado R 1621 To:9709634979 1 i, r J, "n h l · 1 ,,. i 1 ~ (. ,, l .1, , J 1 •It 1:. lJ h 'i\'l'lll. ,;llii!\. p,,,j,: l""'i I lkn1~• "·,_, "'!'<lip,;•. { , .j, •I 1•1•.\ ,lo.j ht_"lj !':l•\IK <!"~:_'. !.J.t') ;·•.IS.'I I· ,., •)~i' ''41 ... ;4·~4 t."lll.lll l.J').,ni"''Lc";'''''~!: •••HI Job No. 109 006A s.uhject: Observation of Excavation. Proposed Rt".sidence, Lot M-20, Roaring Fork Mesa, Aspen Olen Subdivision, Comer ofGoklstone and Angier, Gs.r11eld County, Co lorado Dear Mr. Gruenefe!dt: As requested, a tepresentative of Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnics!, Inc. observed the excavation at the subject site on March 20 and 21, 2009 to evaluate the :>oils exposed for ibundation gupport. The tindings of our observations and recommendations t()r the foundation design are presented in this report. We previously conduc!ed a subsoil study tor design of foundations at the site mid presented our findings in a report d11tcd January 23, 2009, Job No. l 09 006A. Our serviceH wme pertonned in accordance with our proposal for professional engineering servicc;s to Grucnefeldt Construction, dated January 5, 2009. At the time of our initiai visit to the site, the foundation excavation had been cut in multiple levels fi·om 1 to 7 feel below the adjace'nt ground .~urfacc and the footing forms had been placed. The soils exposed in the bottom of the excavation consisted of relatively dense alluvial .sandy gravel with cobbles in the southwest half of the excaval ion. The northeast half of the e;;;:avation transitioned from clayey sandy gravel with cobbles to sandy clay in the northeast corner. We recommended ilutt the clay in the northeast comer be subexcavated down. to the dens~ gravel soils. The fi)otlng grade can be lowered dovm to bear on the gravel soils or the trench excavation can be backfilled up to design looting grade with "flow fill" (lean concrete.). No fi·ee water was encounter~d in the excavation and the soils were slightly moist to moist. We observed the completed excavation on March 21, 2009. The northeast corner of the <)Xcavation had been subexcavated about 3 to 4 feet down to the gravel subsoils. Mr. Gmenefekh stated that he plmtned to back!ill back up to design footing grade with concrete prior to reforming footings in this area. The gravel soils exposed in the cmnptcted excavation are' generally consistent with those previously encountered on th~ she <md suitable fin support of spread footineJS Jesigned for the recommended albwahle bez,ring p;·essure of2,500 psf. Loose and disllirb~d soils ~hou!d be removed in the fi,oting areas to expose the undistLlrbed nmural &'ravel soils. The bearbg soil' should be proteeted from frost and concrete should not be placed on frozen HRR-23··2009 13:53 Fr em: HP-GEOTECH Gruenefeldt Construr.tion March 23, 2009 Page 2 To:970953~979 soils. Other recommendations presented in our previous repor1 which are applicable should also he observed. The recommendations submitted in this letter are-based on our observation of the sc ils exposed within the foundation excavation and the previous limited subsurface exploratiun at the site. Variations in the subsurface conditions below the excavation could increase the risk of foundat10n movement. We should be advised of any variations encountered in the excavation conditions for possible changes to recommendations contained in this letter. If you have any questions or need further assistance, please cull our ot!icc. Sincerely, HEPWORTH·-PA Wl"AK GEOTCHNICAL, INC. ~';: #I ' ·: 1.1 ,...,.~\ '.\{. (), )I ( ;.·~·I. I }. {I ' ~".... .. ( ... ~ ........... --' ;. . t-. ..,........... ... J Daniel E. Hardin, f'.E. DEH/ksw Jot;N-n.-r-ory 00-6-A ---------- Parcel Detail Garfield County Assessor IT reasurer Parcel Detail Information Page I of 4 A_s_sessor/Jrea~urer ProJL~rtySearch I ~SSBllll_or S_yb§et Query I Ass!l]J;QCQflles Search Clerk H Record!lrJ]G]]tion Search Basic Buildinglillil_nu;teristics I T axJ!l]Qcmation Parcel Detail I Value Detail I S!lles Detail I R~§identiai/CommerciillLrnpmv~mllnt Detflil Land Illl1llll I Photogwhs I MHLLevy Revenues Detail IT ax Area II Account Number II Parcel Number II2DDB Mill levy I I D82 II R820022 II 238318101020 II 64.673 I Owner Name and Mailing Address !FORSMAN. JOE C H BEVERLY K 13808 86TH STREET !LUBBOCK. TX 78423 Assessor's Parcel Description {Not to be used as a legal description) ISECT.TWN.RNG:IS-7-88 SUB:ROARING IFDRK MESA @l ASPEN GLEN LDT:20 IPRE:R820001 BK:0866 PG:0683 BK:0866 IPG:0682 BK:0825 PG:0346 BK:0846 IPG:0615 BK:0835 PG:0305 IRECPT:763386 RECPT:763385 BK:I701 IPG:812 RECPT:B77185 BK:I701 PG:811 IRECPT:B77184 BK:1046 PG:0454 http:/ I www.garcoact.coml assessor I parcel.asp?ParceiNumber= 23931810 I 020 I I I I I I I I I I I 315/2009 Parcel Detail IIBK:OS21 PG:OBBI BK:OS21 PG:OSBI II I I I I I I I I I location Physical Address: i!CARBDNOALE I Subdivision: I ROARING FORK MESA @l ASPEN GLEN land Acres: 110.281 I land Sq Ft: I 0 Section II Township II Range I IS II 7 II 88 I 2DDB Property Tax Valuation Information II Actual Value II Assessed Value I land: II us.oooll Improvements: II oil Total: II 115.000IJ Most Recent Sale Sale Date: Jll/18/2008 Sale Price: 11208.800 Basic Building Characteristics Number of Residentialio Buildings: . Number of Comm/lnd\\o 33.3501 ol 33.3501 http:// www.garcoact.com/ assessor I parcel. asp ?Parcel Number= 23831 SID I 020 Page 2 of 4 3/5/2008 Parcel Detail II I Tax Year II I 2008 II I 2008 II I 2007 II I 2007 II I 2007 II I 2006 II I 2006 II I 2005 II I 2005 II I 2005 II I 2004 II I 2004 II I 2004 II I 2003 II I 2003 I I 2003 I 2002 I I 2002 II I 2002 II I 2001 II I 2001 II I 2001 II I 2000 II I 2000 II " Buildings: II No Building Records Found Tax Information Transaction Type Tax Payment: Whole Tax Amount Tax Payment: Second Ha If Tax Payment: First Half Tax Amount Tax Payment: Whole Tax Amount Tax Payment: Second Half Tax Payment: First Half Tax Amount Tax Payment: Second Half Tax Payment: First Half Tax Amount Tax Payment: Second Half Tax Payment: First Half Tax Amount Tax Payment: Second Half Tax Payment: First Half Tax Amount Tax Payment: Second Half Tax Payment: First Half Tax Amount Tax Payment: Second Half Tax Payment: First Half http:/ I www.garcoact.coml assessor I parcel.asp? Parcel Number=23 9319101020 Page 3 of 4 II Amount I I ($2.156.84)1 $2.156.841 I ($1.083.48)1 II ($1.083.48)1 II $2.166.861 II ($2.241.60)11 II $2.241.821 II ($1.125.88)1 II ($1.125.88)1 II $2.251.761 II ($1.560.88)j II ($1.560.88)11 II $3.121.781 1 II ($1.328.10)/ II ($1.328.10)1 II $2.656.201 II ($1.616.50)1 II ($1.616.50)1 II $3.233.001 II ($1.625.04)1 II ($1.625.04)1 II $3.250.081 II ($1.508.41)1 II ($1.508.41)1 " 31512009 ParcBI DBtail I 2000 II Tax Amount II $3.016.821 I 1988 Tax Payment: Second Half II ($1.525.87)1 I 1988 Tax Payment: First Half II ($1.525.87)1 I 1988 I Tax Amount II $3.051.741 IllJ!!lfJl.ggJI Assessor Oataba~!LS~;:u:gnDp!lhlD.~ I T reasur_er Database Search Ogtions Ckcklt Recorder Database SearchOptlq11~ Gi3rfield.Gounty_HornePag~ PagB 4 of 4 The Garfield County Assessor and Treasurer's Offices make every effort to collect and maintain accurate data. However. Good Turns Software and the Garfield County Assessor and Treasurer's Offices are unable to warrant any of the information herein contained. Copyright~ 2005-2008 Good Turns Software. All Rights Reserved. Database 6 Web Design by GoQdiwm.s.Sgf!Y£ar~. http:! I www.garcoact.coml assessor I parcel.asp?ParcBINumbBr= 239319101020 315/2009