Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Application-Permit
JDlDC D •· . Garfield County ·Building & Planning Department C) 108 8th Street, Suite #401 Glenwood Springs, Co. 81601 lJ"- Offlce:970·945·8212 Fax: 970-384-3470 Inspection Line: 970-384·5003 Building Permit No. Parcel No: 2407-033-00-013 Locality: Job Address: 0591 CR 337, Parachute -------------·-···--·-------------~------------------------ Owner: Contractor: Wood Smith Canst. Fees: Plan Check: 365.92 Septic: ·------- Bldg Permit: $ 562.95 Other Fees: Total Fees: $ 928.87 ---~-~----- I Clerk: ~·~·-·-Date: I Invoice V endo:t: Invoice Date Nurobe:t: Fund feb . .;lolo B~f~rs8' (t5t Prepared By: (!/ Garfield Vendor Number -X:~ ()ttf '~o.JJ . Dept Sub Dept Account [17 ()'"}C> iJ<f(f(j Purchase Order Number If Purchase Order is complete check box: ih.fl i/m{&;;;J Project# (if Line Item applicable) (64 Cha:racte:rs or Less) ~ '5' .<.% to'> BP X ?o•;. ::: 'tS<>· a~;. ...t\ (a.-.4·'1._ .L . '" ,;;s) ,;©I D ' Special Instructiolls For Warrant Invoice Brief Description Dollar (64 Characters or Less) Amount a·(?;~ u, '.iir .P -.fo "~ Jl l.( 5:,' 3 ~ ~df}!i( f(J iJ. <..<.< ~~ .u Total $'!so.~, By signing below) I certify that all items and/ or services have been received, inspected, and accepted; and-that this amount is correct and proper for payment. Depa:r:tment Head App:roval: 2010_AP _Voucher.xlsx I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION 108 8'" Street, Suite 401, Glenwood Springs, Co 8!601 Phone: 970-945-82!2 I Fax: 970-384-3470 I Inspection Line: 970-384-5003 www.garfield-county.com C .... .l..\ Parcel No: (this information is avallable at the assessors office 970-945-9134) Z4:o1 -o33 -oa-o 13 Job Address: (if an address has not been assigned, please provide Cr, Hwy or Street Name & City) or and legal description 05Cfl C. f!.,. 337 PftRAci-IUTc. Co, 81lo5.5" Lot No: Block No: Subd./ Exemption: Owner: (property owner) CrA'-1 Lci/.JJ e l'fN Lf S.5 /-lt;;tJR.'( Mailing Address:o!>"' ( CJI..]:Y? 5A MC • p,;_ .,.o... 0> • Ph: Contractor: CoA.lSI. Mailing Address: wooj) ;SM IT)L 353 HA1~V€l" 61LT C,ftl' R.l>. P.t &SZ Phf~~r:~~z-z_ Architect I Engineer: j l VJ DOP.5fVI rri-1 Wf.57/+R. Mailing Address: Ph: .54 I'"IC Sq. Ft. of Building: I Sq. Ft. or Acres of Lot: Height: 13 1 .527 Y1-8o+ A CRE-.:, Use of Building: MA5TEf; B'GP<?M. -. REMODf_l_ C"'f-. r'5' ""C J3tfr!-1 R fV/ Describe Work: Alt Ph; Alt Ph: 4 (, 37<'f -3r AltPh: No. of Floors: I - 9 lVI ft:ti-r£ 1<. 13tDR.M. fi-lJJ>iT/o/11 --f(Vvt_t>]JEL E'f.-_1 :!>TIN C., /3ftTHRilll .. 10 Class of Work: oNew o Alteration )!(Addition 11 Garage: fJ A· Septic: I\}, It, o Attached 0 Detached oiSDS o Community 12 Driveway Permit: rJ.4. Owners valuation of Work: $ 8o ooo <?£ NOTICE Authority. Thls application for a Building Permit must be signed by the Owner of the property, described above, or an authorized agent If the signature below is not that of the Owner, a separate letter of authority, signed by the Owner, must be provided with this Application. Legal Access. A Building Permit cannot be issued without proof of legal and adequate access to the property for purposes of inspections by the Building Department. Other Permits. Multiple separate permits may be required: (1) State Electrical Permit, (2) County ISDS Permit, (3) another permit required for use on the property identified above, e.g. State or County Highway/ Road Access or a State Wastewater Discharge Permit. Void Permit. A Building Permit becomes null and void if the work authorized is not commenced within 180 days of the date of issuance and if work is suspended or abandoned for a period of 180 days after commencement. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that I have read this Application and that the information contained above is true and correct. I understand that the Building Department accepts the Application, along with the plans and specifications and other data submiued by me or on my behalf (submittals), based upon my certification as to accuracy. Assuming completeness of the submittals and approval of this Application, a Building Permit will be issued granting permission to me, as Owner, to construct_ the structure(s) and facilities detailed on the submittals reviewed by the Building Department. In consideration of the issuance of the Building Pennit, I agree that 1 and my agents will comply with provisions of any federal, state or local Jaw regulating the work and the Garfield County Building Code, ISDS regulations and applicable land use regulations (County Regulation(s)). I acknowledge that the Building Permit may be suspended or revoked, upon notice from the County, if the location, construction or use of the structure(s) and fadlity(ies), described above, are not in compliance with County Regulation(s) or any other applicable law. I hereby grant permission to the Building Department to enter the property, described above, to inspect the work. I further acknowledge that the issuance of the Building Pennit does not prevent the . Building Official from: (1) requiring the correction of errors in the submittals, if any, discovered after issuance; or (2) stopping constmction or use of the structure(s) or facility(ies) if such is in violation of County Regulation(s) or any other applicable law. Review of this Application, including submittals, and inspections of the work by the Building Department do not constitute an acceptance of responsibility or liability by the County of errors, omissions or discrepancies. As the Owner, I acknowledge that responsibility for compliance with federal, state and local Jaws and County Regulations rest with me and my authorized agents, including without limitation my architect designer, engineer and/ or builder. I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HA VB READ AND UNDERSTAND THE NOTICE & CERTIFICATJON ABOVE: IV1UilJ kJi ~ fl~ [.J)I{JVvvl<j OWNERS SIGNATURE ATE 3-1-o7 Special Conditions: Adjusted Valuation: Plan Check Fee: Permit Fee: U Manu bo)f e Fe~: Mise llb.s: 41P74.to 191U'.G(2. £~~·'1~ ISDSFee: Total Fees: Balance Due: ~ & Issue Date: ISDS No & Issued Date: ~~.67 ~7~.16 1/ J 25?--, 3i ")?;,/ 19'1 Zoning: R Setbacks: OCCGroup: ConstType: BLDG~·~T: .·~~ ,1 '~. ~ APPRIW L ~ . DATE DATE The following items are required by Garfield County for a final Inspection: 1) A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector. 2) Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department and posted at the structure and where readily visible from access road. 3) A finished roof; a lockable building; completed exterior siding; exterior doors and windows installed; a complete kitchen with cabinets, sink with hot & cold running water, non-absorbent kitchen floor covering, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove and refrigerator; all necessary plumbing. 4) All bathrooms must be complete, with washbowl, tub or shower, toilet, hot and cold running water, non-absorbent floors, walls finished, and privacy door. 5) Steps over three (3) risers, outside or inside must be must have handrails. Balconies and decks over 30" high must be constructed to all ffiC and IRC requirements including guardrails. 6) Outside grading completed so that water slopes away from the building; 7) Exceptions to the outside steps, decks, grading may be made upon the demonstration of extenuating circumstances., i.e. weather. Under such circumstances A Certificate of Occupancy may be issued conditionally. 8) A final inspection sign off by the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department for driveway installation, where applicable; as well as any final sign off by the Fire District, and/or State Agencies where applicable. A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (C.O.) WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. A C.O. MAY TAKE UP TO 5 BUSINESS DAYS TO BE PROCESSED AND ISSUED. OWNER CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A C.O. IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATING PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET. I understand and agree to abide by the above conditions for occupancy, use and the issuance of a C.O. for the building identified in the Building Permit. ~})~JL ~ ;d Jl OWNERS SIGNATURE '# ~ DATE Bapplicationdecernber2007 03/17/2009 17: 10 21:J,?1948 HENRY PAGE 01 GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING 970-945-8212 MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS For SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING CONSTRUCTION Including NEW CONSTRUCTION ADDITIONS ALTERATIONS And MOVED BUILDINGS In order to understand the scope of the work intended under a permit application and expedite the issuance of a permit it is important that complete information be provided. When reviewing a plan and it's discovered that required information has not been provided by the applicant, this will result in the delay of the permit issuance and in proceeding with building construction. The owner or contractor shall be required to provide this information before the plan review can proceed. Other plans that are in line for review may be given attention before the new information may be reviewed after it has been provided to the Building Department. TWO (2) SETS OF CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS & TWO (2) SITE PLANS MUST BE SUBMITTED FOR ALL APPLICATIONS. Please review this document to determine if you have enough information to design your project and provide adequate information to facilitate a plan review. Also, please consider using a design professional for assistance in your design and a construction professional for construction of your project. Any project with more than ten (10) occupants requires the plans to be sealed by a Colorado Registered Design Professional. To provide for a more understandable plan in order to determine compliance with the building, plumbing and mechanical codes, applicants are requested to review the following checklist prior to and during design. Applicants are required to indicate appropriately and to submit the completed checklist at time of application for a permit. Plans to be included for a Building Permit, must be on drafting paper at least 18"x24" and drawn to scale. 5. Have you provided any RESOLUTIONS and/ or LAND USE PERMIT(S) associated with this property? Yes if Yes please provide a COPY. No_~'-'--- 6. Are you aware that prior to submittal of a building permit application you are required to show proof of a legal and adequate access to the site? This may include (but is not limited to) proof of your right to use a private easement/right of way; A County Road and Bridge permit; a Colorado Dept. of Highway Permit, including a Notice to Proceed; a permit from the federal government or any combination. You can contact the Road & Bridge Department at 625-860 I. See phone book for other agencies Yes. __ _L_ __ 7. Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all reinforcing steel in accordan,c7 with the IRC or per stamped engineered design? Y es. __ -11''------ 8. Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl spaces and the clearances required between wood and earth? Yes I< No ----- 9. Do the plans indicate the size and location of ventilation openings for the attic, roof joist spaces and soffits? Yes )( -----'---No ____ _ I 0. Do the plans include design loads as required by Garfield County for roof snow loads, (a minimum of 40 pounds per square foot up to & including 7,000 feet above sea level), floor loads and wind loads? Yes ----"--- II. Does the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor, and roof construction? Yes·----1>--- 12. Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists, wall studs, ceiling joists, roof rafters or joists or trusses? Yes. __ +''---- 13. Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method of positive connection of all columns and beams? Yes ___ ~---- 14. Does the elevation plan indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the undisturbed grade to the midpoint between the ridge and eave of a gable or shed roof or the top of a flat roof? (Building height measurement usually not to exceed 25 feet) Yes._--1-~--- 3 25. Do you understand that the minimum dimension a home can be on a lot is 20ft. wide and 20ft. long? Yes __ +-- 26. Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other construction code requirements? Yes ___ .t..:.._ 27. Do your plans comply with all zoning rules and regulations in the County related to your properties zone district? Yes ________ ~----- 28. Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a final inspection by the Garfield County Building Department? Yes X 29. Do you understand that approval for design and/or construction changes are required prior to the application of these changes? Yes __ -P'--- 30. Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a "Plan Review" fee from you at the time of application submittal and that you will be required to pay the "Permit Fee" as well as any "Road Impact" or "Septic System" fees required, at the time you pick up your building permit? Yes --A--- 31. Are you aware that you must call in for an inspection hy 3:30 the business day before the requested inspection in order to receive it the following business day? Inspections will be made from 7:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. Monday through Friday. Inspections are to be called in to384-500V Yes p, No ______ _ 32. Are you aware that requesting inspections on work that is not ready or not accessible will result in a $50.00 re-inspection fee? Yes ----~-'--- 33. Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the IRC including approval on a final inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy and occupancy of the building? \( Yes _____ _ 5 ProjectName: GA'ILof<.J) f PWL/.55 1/t;;('JRy 1/])prrtoiJ . I ,.ff. !3tr1?U•1-f£.1Viot>e'-. Project Address: 05'11 c. {(. fA.R.~aJ tJ re CP · Bfh 3 5' Notes: If any required information is missing delays in issuing the permit are to be expected. Work may not proceed without the issuance of a permit. If it is determined by the Building Official that additional information is necessary to review the application and plans to determine minimum compliance with the adopted codes, the application may be placed behind more recent applications for building permits in the review process and not reviewed until required information has been provided and the application rotates again to first position for review, delay in issuance of the permit or delay in proceeding with construction. bpminreqsfJan2009 7 . GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING REQUIREMENTS Codes: 2003 IRC, lBC, IFGC, IMC, IPC, Setbacks: Check subdivisions and zone district for setback requirements. Snowload (measured at the roof): 40PSF up to 7000ft. elevation. Seismic design category: B SOP SF 7001 to 8000ft. 7 5PSF 8001 to 9000ft. lOOP SF 9001 to 1 OOOOft. Weathering probability for concrete: Severe Termite infestation probability: None to slight Wind speed: 90mph Decay probability: None to slight Wind Exposure: B or C (see section R301.2.1.4) Frost Depth: 36in. to 8000ft. elevation. 42in. 8001 and above. Winter Design Temperature: Minus 2 to 7000ft.; minus 16 over 7000ft. elevation. Air Freezing Index: 2500deg F-days to 7000ft.; over 7000ft. to be determined by Building Official. Ice shield under-layment required. Mean Annual temp.: Variable Insulation: Maximum glazing U factor: 0.50 Minimum R-Values: • • • Ceilings/roofs R values are: R-30 stick built structures. R-38 log construction and steel rafter construction. Walls Rvalues ai:e R-19 wood frame; R-19 cavity R-3 sheathing steel studs. Floors R-values are R-19 . • • • Basement wall R-values are R-10 beTow grade, R -19 above grade. Slab perimeter R-value and depth is R- 10/36in. Crawl space wall R-values are R-10 below grade and R -19 above grade If floors over crawl spaces are not insulated, the crawl space walls must be insulated. Basement wall must be insulated to frost depth. Common walls garage to house must have R -19 insulatibn. Common ceiling/floor garage to house must have R-19. Take precautions to protect plumbing in these areas. 11258 No. --------------------Assessor's Parcel No. _______ 2_4_0_7_-0_3_3_-o_o_-o· Date ___ 3_12_3_12_00_9 __ IBUU.DING PERMIT CARD Job Address ----~0~59~1~C~R~3~3~7~P~a~ra~c~h~u~te~·--------------------------~----------,-~~~~ Owner ________ G_a-=y.:....lo_r_d.:...., _Ph-=y:....l_lis_&_H_e_n_:ry:.__ __ Address __ 05_9_1_C_R_3_3_7_, P_'_ch_u_t_e_ Phone # {0;2._ S .)DC Contractor Woodsmith Const. Address 353 Harvey Gap Rd. Silt Phone # 970-876-2822 Setbacks: Front __________ Rear _____ RH _____ LH ________ Zoning _____ _ master bdrm add/remodel master bath Soils Test-------------------- Footing -----------------------Foundation _______________ _ Grout ____________________ __ Underground Plumbing ______ _ Rough Plumbing ----------- Framing ___________________ _ Insulation------------------ Roofing-------------------- Drywall ------------------- Gas Piping----------'------ INSPECTIONS Weatherproofing _______________ _ Mechanical _________________ _ Electrical Rough (State)--------- Electrical Final (State) __________ __ Final /Checklist Completed? ___ _ Certificate Occupancy # ---------Date _____________ _ Septic System # ------------------- Date -------------Final _____________ _ Other _____________ ~------------- NOTES, atPiv~ ""'--"'-,;;x( ont~n ~~ HEPWORTH· PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL SUBSOIL STUDY Hepworth~ Pawlak Geotechnic8l, Inc. 5020 County Road 154 · Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Phone' 970-945-7988 Fax, 970-945-8454 email: hpgeo@hpgeotech.con1 FOR FOUNDATION DESIGN PROPOSED ADDITION TO RESIDENCE 0591 COUNTY ROAD 337 MORRISANIA MESA EAST OF BATTLEMENT MESA GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO JOB NO. 109 027A FEBRUARY 19, 2009 PREPARED FOR: WOODSMITH CONSTRUCTION ATTN: MICHAEL SMITH 353 HARVEY GAP ROAD (COUNTY ROAD 327) SILT, COLORADO 81652 Parker 303-841-7119 e Colorado Springs 719-633-5562 ° Silverthorne 970-468-1989 TABLE OF CONTENTS PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY ........................................................................ - 1 - PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ................................................................................. - 1 - SITE CONDITIONS ................................................................................................... -2- FIELD EXPLORATION ............................................................................................ -2- SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS .................................................................................. -2- DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................. -3- FOUNDATIONS .................................................................................................... -3- UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM ...................................................................................... -4- SURFACE DRAINAGE ......................................................................................... -5- LIMITATIONS .......................................................................................................... -5- FIGURE 1-LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORING FIGURE 2-LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING FIGURE 3 -LEGEND AND NOTES FIGURE 4-SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS TABLE 1-SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY This report presents the results of a subsoil study for a proposed addition to the existing residence located at 0591 County Road 337, Morrisania Mesa, East of Battlement Mesa, Garfield County, Colorado. The project site is shown on Figure 1. The purpose of the study was to develop recommendations for the foundation design. The study was conducted in accordance with our agreement for geotechnical engineering services to Woodsmith Construction dated February 5, 2009. An exploratory boring was drilled at the site to obtain information on the subsurface conditions. Samples of the subsoils obtained during the field exploration were tested in the laboratory to detennine their classification, compressibility or swell and other engineering characteristics. The results of the field exploration and laboratory testing were analyzed to develop recommendations for foundation types, depths and allowable pressures for the proposed addition foundation. This report summarizes the data obtained during this study and presents our conclusions, design recommendations and other geotechnical engineering considerations based on the proposed construction and the subsurface conditions encountered. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION The proposed 28 foot by 18 foot addition will be a twci story, wood frame structure attached to the east side of the existing residence shown on Figure 1. The main floor level will be structural over a crawlspace. Grading for the structure is assumed to be relatively minor with cut depths between about 3 to 4 feet. We assume relatively light foundation loadings, typical of the proposed type of construction. lfbuilding loadings, location or grading plans change significantly from those described above, we should be notified to re-evaluate the recommendations contained in this report. Job No. 109 027 A -2- SITE CONDITIONS The property is located to the south of County Road 337 and was occupied by a two story, wood frame residence over crawlspace as shown on Figure 1. Lawn areas are located inunediately adjacent to the residence and a vacant pasture is located to the east. The ground surface around the existing residence and in the pasture was mostly covered with up to 4 inches of snow at the time of our field exploration. The ground surface in the area of the proposed addition was relatively flat with a gentle slope down to the northwest. There was about 1 foot of elevation difference across the approximate addition area. Vegetation consisted of grass (visible where the snow had melted) and several mature trees located around the residence. FIELD EXPLORATION The field exploration for the project was conducted on February 12, 2008. An exploratory boring was drilled at the location shown on Figure 1 to evaluate the subsurface conditions. The borings were advanced with 4-inch diameter continuous flight augers powered by a truck-mounted CME-45B drill rig. The boring was Jogged by a representative of Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. Samples of the subsoils were taken with 1% inch and 2 inch I. D. spoon samplers. The samplers were driven into the subsoils at various depths with blows from a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches. This test is similar to the standard penetration test described by ASTM Method D-1586. The penetration resistance values are an indication of the relative density or consistency of the subsoils. Depths at which the samples were taken and the penetration resistance values are shown on the Log of Exploratory Boring, Figure 2. The samples were retumed to our laboratory for review by the project engineer and testing. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS A graphic log of the subsoil profile encountered in the boring is shown on Figure 2. The subsoils, below about Y, foot of topsoil, consist of about 4\1, feet of sandy clay and 3 feet of silty sand with scattered gravel overlying relatively dense basalt rocks up to possible boulder size in a sandy clay matrix down to the maximum explored depth of2! feet. Job No. 109 027A ~tech -3 - Laboratory testing performed on samples obtained from the borings included natural moisture content, density and percent finer than No. 200 sieve (silt and clay fraction) gradation analyses. Results of swell-consolidation testing performed on a relatively undisturbed drive sample, presented on Figure 4, indicate low to moderate compressibility under conditions ofloading and wetting. The laboratory testing is summarized in Table !. No free water was encountered in the boring at the time of drilling and the subsoils were slightly moist to moist. DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS FOUNDATIONS Considering the subsurface conditions encountered in the exploratmy boring and the nature of the proposed construction, we recommend the addition be founded with spread footings bearing on the natural subsoils. The design and construction criteria presented below should be observed for a spread footing foundation system. I) Footings placed on the undisturbed natural subsoils should be designed for an allowable bearing pressure of I ,500 psf. Based on experience, we expect settlement of footings designed and constructed as discussed in this section will be about 1 inch or less. Settlements could be differential between the existing foundation and new footings. 2) The footings should have a minimum width of18 inches for continuous walls and 2 feet for isolated pads. 3) Exterior footings and footings beneath unheated areas should be provided with adequate soil cover above their bearing elevation for frost protection. Placement of foundations at least 36 inches below exterior grade is recommended for this part of Garfield County. Job No. 109 027 A ~tech -4- 4) Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span local anomalies such as by assuming an unsupported length of at least 12 feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining structures should also be designed to resist a lateral earth pressure corresponding to an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 55 pcf for the on-site soils as backfill, devoid of topsoil, vegetation and oversized rock. 5) Any existing fill, topsoil and any loose or disturbed soils should be removed and the footing bearing level extended down to undisturbed natural soils. The soils exposed in footing areas should be moistened and compacted prior to constructing footings. 6) A representative of the geotechnical engineer should observe all footing excavations prior to concrete placement to evaluate bearing conditions. UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM Although free water was not encountered during our exploration, it has been our experience that local perched groundwater can develop during times of heavy precipitation or seasonal runoff Frozen ground during spring runoff can create a perched condition. We reconnnend the craw !space area (if deeper than 4 feet) be protected from wetting and hydrostatic pressure buildup by an underdrain system. An underdrain system is not needed for a crawlspace area shallower than 4 feet provided that the wall backfill is well compacted and positive surface drainage away from the foundation is maintained around the addition. If provided, the drain should consist of drainpipe surrounded above the invert level with free-draining granular matetial. The drain should be placed at each level of excavation and at least I foot below lowest adjacent finish grade and sloped at a minimum I% to a suitable gravity outlet or sump and pump. Free-draining granular material used in the underdrain system should contain less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve, less than 50% passing the No. 4 sieve and have a maximum size of2 inches. The drain gravel backfill should be at least I Y, feet deep. An impervious membrane, such as 20 or 30 mil PVC, should be placed beneath the drain gravel in a trough shape and attach to the foundation Job No. 109 027 A ~tech -5 - wall with mastic to prevent wetting of the bearing soils. SURFACE DRAINAGE The following drainage precautions should be observed during construction and maintained at all times after the addition has been completed: I) Inundation of the foundation excavations should be avoided during construction. 2) Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density in pavement and slab areas and to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density in landscape areas. 3) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the addition should be sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions. We recommend a minimum slope of 6 inches in the first I 0 feet in unpaved areas and a minimum slope of3 inches in the first I 0 feet in paved areas. Free-draining wall backfill should be capped with about 2 feet of the on- site, fine grained soils to reduce surface water infiltration. 4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill. 5) Landscaping which requires regular heavy irrigation and sprinkler heads should be located at least 5 feet from foundation walls. LIMITATIONS This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no warranty either express or implied. The conclusions and recmrunendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the exploratory boring drilled at the location indicated on Figure I, the proposed type of construction and our experience in the area. Our services do not include determining the presence, prevention or possibility of mold or other biological contaminants (MOBC) developing in the future. If the client is concerned about MOBC, then a professional in this special field of practice should be No. 109 027A ~tech -6- consulted. Our findings include extrapolation of the subsurface conditions identified at the exploratory boring and variations in the subsurface conditions may not become evident until excavation is performed. If conditions encountered during construction appear different fi"om those described in this report, we should be notified so that re- evaluation of the recommendations may be made. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes. We are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. As the project evolves, we should provide continued consultation and field services during construction to review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations, and to verify that the recommendations have been appropriately interpreted. Significant design changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommendations presented herein. We recommend on-site observation of excavations and foundation bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a representative of the geotechnical engineer. Respectfully Submitted, HEPWORTH c PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. Trevor L. Knell, P.E. Reviewed by: TLK!vam cc: Westar Engineering-Attn: Stephen Kesler, P.E. Job No. 109 027 A ~tech BENCH MARK: MAIN LEVEL FINISHED FLOOR AT ENTRY; ELEV. ~ 1 00.0', ASSUMED CHIMNEY PORCH EXISTING RESIDENCE; 0591 COUN1Y ROAD 337 NOTE; SITE PLAN PREPARED FROM FIELD SKETCH. COUN1Y ROAD 337 58' BORING 1 EXISTING FENCE EXISTING PHONE PEDESTAL VACANT PASTURE NOT TO SCALE 109 027A ~tech LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORING FIGURE 1 HEPWORTH·PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL 100 95 li:i 90 UJ "- z 0 ~ > ~ 85 UJ 80 75 109 027A EXISTING MAIN FLOOR LEVEL BORING 1 ELEV.=99.1' 11/12 WC~23.0 00~94 -200~67 12/12 wc~25.6 00~86 -200~19 50/8 WC~6.3 -200~24 54/10 86/12 Note: Explanation of symbols is shown on Figure 3. ~tech LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL 100 95 90 li:i UJ "- z 0 85 i= ~ ~ UJ 80 75 FIGURE 2 LEGEND: TOPSOIL; silty sandy clay, firm, slightly moist, dark brown, organics. CLAY (CL); sandy, silty, stiff, slightly moist to moist, dark brown. SAND (SM); silty, with scattered gravel, medium dense, slightly moist to moist, whitish light brown. BASALT ROCKS (GC); possibly up to boulder size, in a sandy clay matrix, medium dense to dense, slightly moist, brown. Relatively undisturbed drive sample; 2-inch I. D. California liner sample. Drive sample; standard penetration test (SPT), 1 ~-inch I. D. split spoon sample, ASTM D-1586. Drive sample blow count; indicates that 11 blows of 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches were required to drive 11 112 the California or SPT sampler 12 inches. NOTES: 1. The exploratory boring was drilled on February 12, 2009 with 4-inch diameter continuous flight power auger. 2. The locations of the exploratory boring was measured approximately by pacing from features shown on Figure 1. 3. The elevation of the exploratory boring was measured by instrument level and refers to the Bench Mark shown on Figure 1. 4. The exploratory boring location and elevation should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. 5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory boring log represent the approximate boundaries between material types and transitions may be gradual. 6. No free water was encountered in the boring at the time of drilling. Fluctuation in water level may occur with time. 7. Laboratory Testing Results: WC = Water Content ( % ) DD = Dry Density ( pet ) -200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve 109 027A ~ech HEPWORTH·PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL LEGEND AND NOTES FIGURE 3 Moisture Content = 23.0 percent Dry Density = 94 pel Sample of: Sandy Clay From: Boring 1 at 2 Feet . I I I -?{!. 0 I I [I ~ -::r / z I 0 ·"--I I I U5 1 ff3 ~ I I [I cr: ~ I r-No movement Q_ I', upon wetting II ::;;: 2 0 II I II () I I I I I I I I I I ,-----I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I I I D I ' II I I I I I I II I I I I I I I I I I I 0.1 1.0 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE ( ksf) 109 027A ~tech SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS FIGURE 4 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. TABLE 1 SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS Job No. 109 027A SAMPLE LOCATION NATURAL NATURAL GRADATION PERCENT ATTERBERG LIMITS UNCONFINED MOISTURE DRY PASSING LIQUID PLASTIC COMPRESSIVE SOIL (ft) CONTENT DENSITY GRAVEL SAND NO. 200 LIMIT INDEX STRENGTH TYPE (%) (pel) (%) (%) SIEVE (%) (%) (psf) 1 2 23.0 94 67 Sandy clay 5 25.6 86 19 Silty sand with gravel 10 6.3 24 Clayey sand and gravel Parcel Detail Page I of 4 Garfield County Assessor/Treasurer Parcel Detail Information A§sessox/Ire_asuredm!2ertxl'earcl1 I A§sessocSllh~LQuery I 8.J>s~5sor Sales __ SellJ£ch Ct~k_& Rec£mles Reception_Search P_11Scell2etail I '£!Mue Detail I Sill.es_Qetail I R~~identifll/Commex>:iallml2rovementJ2etail _.L.apd Demil I I'hotograpbJ> I Mill LevyJs,even1!e5D_e1fli1 I Tax Area II Account Number II Parcel Number II 2008 Mill Levy I I 021 II R27o26o II 24o7o33ooo13 II 35.oo7 I Owner Name and Mailing Address IHENRY, GAYLORD J. & PHYLLIS L. /0591 COUNTY ROAD 337 !PARACHUTE, CO 81635 Assessor's Parcel Description (Not to be used as a legal description) ISECT,TWN,RNG:3-7-95 DESC: TR /8(9.86A) TR 9(9.86A) TR 26(9.87 A) /TR 27(19.78A) DESC: E1/2NWSW, A TR IeoNI 4.73 AC 1N S1/2NW ALso A TR IDESC: CONI 9 AC.M!L BK:0476 PG:0161 IBK:0465 PG:0004 BK:0465 PG:0003 IBK:0432 PG:0090 BK:0217 PG:0368 IBK:0199 PG:0597 BK:0199 PG:0264 IRECPT:760105 RECPT:730323 BK:1254 IPG:435 RECPT:581266 BK:0989 PG:0566 IBK:0676 PG:0952 Location I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Physical Address: 11591 337 COUNTY RD PARACHUTE! I · I http:/ !www. garcoact.com/ assessor/parcel.asp ?Parce!N urnber=2407 03 3 000 13 3/4/2009 Parcel Detail I Subdivision: I I Land Acres: I 83.1 I Land Sq Ft: I 0 I Section II Towns hi~ II Range I 3 II 7 II 95 I 2008 Property Tax Valuation Information II Actual Value II Assessed Value I I Land: II 15,7ooll I Improvements: II 100,94oll I Total: II 116,64011 Most Recent Sale I I~==========S=al=eD=a=te~:l I Sale Price: I Additional Sales D<:2t!iil Basic Building Characteristics Number of Residential 1 Buildings: Number of Comm/Ind 0 Buildings: I Residential Building Occurrence 1 Characteristics PORCH, ENCLOSED, 1130 FINISHED: 2 STORY: 11504 1 STORY: 11548 TOTAL HEATED AREA: 111,556 4,5601 8,0301 12,5901 I I I I I ABSTRACT CODE·IIF ARM/RANCH RESIDENCE- . IMPS I ARCHITECTURAL STYLE: 112-STORY I EXTERIOR WALL: IIVINYL I ROOF COVER: llcOMP SHNGL I http://www. garcoact.corn/ assessor/parcel.asp ?Parce!N umber=2407 03 3 000 13 Page 2 of 4 3/4/2009 Parcel Detail Page 3 of4 I ROOF STRUCTURE: IIGABLE I I INTERIOR WALL: IIDRYWALL I I FLOOR: III-lARD TILE I I FLOOR: IICARPET I I HEATING FUEL: IlGAS I HEATING TYPE: IIHOT WATER I STORIES: STORIES 2.0 I BATHS: 2 ROOMS: 6 UNITS: I I BEDROOMS: 12 I YEAR BUILT: 111931 I Tax Information I Tax Year II Transaction Type II Amount I I 2008 II Tax Payment: Whole II ($300.08)1 I 2008 Senior Tax Exemption II ($140.64)1 I 2008 Tax Amount II $440.721 I 2007 Tax Payment: Whole II ($312.08)1 I 2007 Tax Amount $458.321 I 2007 Senior Tax Exemption ($146.24)1 I 2006 Tax Payment: Whole ($328.00)1 2006 I Senior Tax Exemption I ($125.44)1 2006 II Tax Amount II $453.441 2005 II Tax Payment: Whole II ($454.50)1 2005 II Tax Amount II $454.501 2004 II Tax Payment: Whole II ($488.86)1 2004 II Tax Amount $488.861 2003 II Tax Payment: Whole ($524.54)1 I 2003 II Tax Amount $524.541 I 2002 II Tax Payment: Whole I ($531.08)1 I 2002 II Tax Amount II $531.081 2001 II Tax Payment: Whole II ($566.38)1 2001 II Tax Amount II $566.381 2000 II Tax Payment: Whole II ($661.86)1 2000 II Tax Amount II $661.861 --"" - http://www .garcoact.com/ assessor/parcel.asp ?ParcelN umber=240703 3 000 13 3/4/2009 Parcel Detail 1999 II Tax Payment: Whole II ($509.16)1 IP===1~99~9==~11F=====~T=~=A=m=o=oo=t======~lfl====$~5~09~.1~61 1 IQp_oJl'J~gs: A_fL~~-~-~orJ2atabase Search O!ltigns I Ireasure_rJ2<ltab~~_S~Jlr>::l1_QlJticm:> Clerk & Recorder Database Search OlJtions Page 4 of4 The Garfield.Coooty Assessor and Treasurer's Offices make every effort to collect and maintain accurate data. However, Good Turns Software and the Garfield Coooty Assessor and Treasurer's Offices are ooable to warrant any of the information herein contained. Copyright © 2005 -2008 Good Turns Software. All Rights Reserved. Database & Web Design by Good Turns Software. http://www. garcoact.com/ assessor/parcel.asp ?ParcelN umber=2407 03 3 00013 3/4/2009