The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutApplication- Permit1 4 GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING, SANITATION and PLANNING DEPARTMENT 109 Sth. Stmt, Suite 303 Glenwood Spring„ CO 81601(970) 9454212 No. 7247 Job Address 639‘ �� a142.e4 £'u,tPQ j 0th Oekj aliefriad &ti %i• .a -Q42_. Building Permit C.ofY6..23 Nature of Work Use of Buildia Owner Contractor Amount of Permit$ 30g/ . VC vh.) ?tot - (4,21 /83'7 ;z5 g-tddLT-e-- Date L ,y0, /9 qq Clerk f �. i. GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION GARFIELD COUNTY (GLENWOOD SPRINGS), COLORADO TELEPHONE: (970) 945-8212 liApplicant to complete numbered spaces only. 7 INSPECTION LINE: (970) 945-9159 PERMIT NO. V PARCEL/SCHEDULE NO. JOB ADDRESS: 03D..' -f i_o4(201:;56' j ( IE 1 LOT NO. cza BLOCK NO. SUBDIVISIONI 0&.c (t9S L jj 2 ,tel wry) /SYIF:ck 1 kik.. ADORFa/ 5'a9 N iv, A O 2 a.. '.OtA+z VA. t $,Gb QJr[eAl a.4'3SaigL Pea 561-905 (VW L WK PH: 3 CONTRACTOR [t1w/ve ADDRESa 30-9 terviL,44g,watt �: 04.? - i� LC.ND: 94g'H.S-4 Lc 4 AmirrEcrm a Emile , - A� 434 -us, cboetrIL ADDRESS1 b I .e Q. A 1) I I� a PP: 3 -9 VC NO: 5 IQ, FT. OF BUILDING fy SQ. Ff. OF LOT HEIGHT NO. OFFLOOBB 6 USE OF BUILDING s`1Nr t 414 1 L( P .51-1- iM6- ^ DESCRIBE WORK, IIVi VW?) P'PliV 1 /a -FA M4PC' L6 , o�Qix Aoo `vev rotvc00 8 OALTE1.ATTON fHOVE OREMOVE CLASS OF WORK: °ADDmON 9 J1di ✓ BiEJ CARPORT =NOME CDOUB]E CLAMOR: DaNOLE [ 1....) 0 V o DRIVEWAY mom OON SITE SEWAGEDAPOSAL (SEPTIC) Def�E PLAN1 VALUATION OF WORK_ S ADJUg1FP VALUATION:' a g Y^I 3g• 4,, o 0 SPECIAL CONDmONS: A SEPARATE COLORADO. THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZED WORK IS AFTER WORK I HEREBY KNOW THE GOVERNING HEREIN AUTHORITY LOCAL CONSTRUPi del S' , hof Zell NOTICE ELECTRICAL PERMIT IS REQUIRED AND MUST BE ISSUED BY THE STATE OF BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 110 DAYS. OR IF CONSTRUCTION OR SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 110 DAYS AT ANY TIME 1S COMMENCED. CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND ,( •.� F THIS APPLICATION AND SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRE' ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COy'' IFD WrFH WHETHER SPECIFIED OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF P :, 1 DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE TO VIOLATE OR CANC i OVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR LA REGULATING CON —1 sr ION OR THE PERFO• •. CE OF /iii/ % i P / l PLAN CHECK' FEE: u /�' gM,� I PERMIT FEE: r �� 7, TOTAL FEE: O f f ii k �l /3/ DATE PERMIT ISSUED: CONST: TYPE: VJ .Y� ../1 OCC: GROUP: r� , / I n� d 1I ZONING: SETBACKS: a . er, Contractor or auth . : i agent . ' , fad and (I'J�__e_,„ - - {r/Ay ,ii R �,j peps. : �� D MANILHOME: 1SDSNO. &FEE: L�['/�y /y "' D V Building Depth. Approval Date ir t' / r AGREEMENT PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO THE APPLICANT AS OWNER, CONTRACTOR AND/OR TILE AGENT OF THE CONTRACTOR OR OWNER TO CONSTRUCT TILE STRUCTURE URE A. DETAILED ON PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SUBMITTED TO AND REVIEWED BY THE BUTLDINGDEPARTMENT. IN CONSIDERATION OF THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT, THE SIGNER HEREBY AGREES TO COMPLY WHIT ALL BUILDING CODES AND LAND USE REGULATIONS ADOPTED Bl GARFIELD COUNTY PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GIVEN IN 30.21.201 CRS AS AMENDED. THE SIGNER FURTHER AGREES THAT IF THE ABOVE SAID ORDINANCES ARE NOT FULL COMPLIED WITH IN THE LOCATION, ERECTION, CONSTRUCTION AND USE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED STRUCTURE, THE PERMIT MAY THEN BE REVOKED BY NOTICE FROG THE COUNTY AND THAT THEN AND THERE IT SHALL BECOME NULL AND VOID. THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT BASED UPON PIANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA SHALL. NOT PREVENT THE BUILDING OFFICIAL FROM THEREAFTER REQUIRING TTI: CORRECTION OF ERRORS IN SAID PIANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA OR FRO PREVENTING BUILDING OPERATION BEING CARRIED ON THEREUNDER WHEN I' VIOLATION OF THIS CODE OR ANY OTHER ORDINANCE OR REGULATION OF TI IS JURISDICTION. THE REVIEW OF THE SUBMITTED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND INSPECTIONS CONDUCTED THEREAFTER DOES NOT CONSTTFLTE AN ACCEPTANCE OF AN RESPONSIBILITIES OR LIABILITIES BY GARFIELD COUNTY FOR ERRORS, OMISSIONS OR DISCREPANCIES. THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THESE ITEMS AND IMPLEMENTATIO' DURING CONSTRUCTION RESTS SPECIFICALLY WITH THE ARCHITECT, DESIGNER, BUILDER AND OWNER. COMMENTS ARE INTENDED TO BE CONSERVATIVE AND IN SUPPOR OF THE OWNERS INTEREST. Oarfommoo3 I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE AGREEMENT ABOVE. (INITIAL) rti:Q -2)09 It cat* ash The following items are required by Garfield County for a final inspection: 1. A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector; 2. Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department posted where readily visible from access road; 3. A finished roof, a lockable house, complete exterior siding, exterior doors and windows installed, a complete kitchen with cabinets, a sink with hot & cold running water, non-absorbent kitchen floor coverings, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove and refrigerator, all necessary plumbing; _ 4. A complete bathroom, with wash bowl, tub or shower, toilet stool, hot and cold running water, non-absorbent floors and walls finished and a privacy door; 5. All steps outside or inside over three (3) steps must have handrails, guard rails on balconies or decks over 30" high constructed to all 1994 UBC requirements; 6. Outside grading done to where water will detour away from the building; 7, Exceptions to the outside steps, decks and grading may be made upon the demonstration of extenuating circumstances, i.e. weather, but a Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until all the required items are completed and a final inspection made. A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. * * * *CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (C.O.) IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATION PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET. I understand and agree to ab;./by the above conditions for occupancy, use and the issuance of a Certifica of Occupanc..r the dwelling under building permit # '702 ¶/7 . Signature Date bpcont 1.6,17 73/44rrit_ 03.1A/ (Glee -U.4_ k&c. Ye2rAtiOv cto-vme#40.10. 990x149.eo 4.4 $10 • 0O idave-tio s"�G to (04g 6 7I, s4 11 , v4 dut,f-pia4:444Ing 31, 2 g' 44. - ` !,!9'q.z id Sal 002 0.c 3061.46+ 1317.71- 1763.75+ 0. c 1 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. 5020 Road 154 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 October 27, 1998 Ken Thorne 5254 Windsor Park Drive Boca Raton, Florida 33496 Fax 970 945-8454 Phone 970 945-7988 Job No. 198 697 Subject: Subsoil Study for Foundation Design, Proposed Residence, Lot 2, Los Adobes, Garfield County, Colorado Dear Mr. Thorne: As requested, Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. performed a subsoil study for design of foundations at the subject site. The study was conducted in accordance with our agreement for geotechnical engineering services to you dated October 13, 1998. The data obtained and our recommendations based on the proposed construction and subsurface conditions encountered are presented in this report. Proposed Construction: The proposed residence will be a two story wood frame structure over a walkout basement located on the site in the area of Pits 1 to 3 as shown on Fig. 1. Basement floor will be slab -on -grade. The house will step up the hillside and may have a partial crawlspace on the uphill side. Cut depths are expected to range up to about 10 feet. Foundation loadings for this type of construction are assumed to be relatively light and typical of the proposed type of construction. If building conditions or foundation loadings are significantly different from those described above, we should be notified to re-evaluate the recommendations presented in this report. Site Conditions: The site is located on a steeply sloping, south -facing hillside. An existing dirt road switchbacks down through the building area. Cuts and fills up to 12 feet high have been made for the road. Bedrock of the Maroon Formation was observed in a road cut for the northern switchback. The bedding dip appeared to be down to the north at about 10°. The site is vegetated mainly with pinon forest and scattered juniper trees and rabbit brush. There is about 50 feet of elevation difference across the building envelope. Subsurface Conditions: The subsurface conditions at the site were evaluated by excavating three exploratory pits in the proposed building area and observing a profile pit that was previously excavated in the area of the proposed leach field. The pit locations are shown on Fig. 1 and the logs of the pits are presented on Fig. 2. The Ken Thorne October 27, 1998 Page 2 subsurface conditions encountered, below a thin layer of topsoil and clay and silt, consist of weathered siltstone and sandstone bedrock. The bedrock appears to be Eagle Valley Formation siltstone in the lower part of the building area and Maroon Formation siltstone/sandstone near the north side of the building envelope. The Maroon sandstone beds can be massive and may be difficult to excavate. Results of swell -consolidation testing performed on a relatively undisturbed sample of the shallow sandy clay and silt, presented on Fig. 3, indicate moderate compressibility under existing moisture conditions and light loading and a high collapse potential (settlement under constant load) when wetted. About 3 feet of fill was encountered in Pit 1 on the downhill side of the road switchback. The soils exposed in the leach field profile pit consisted of sandy clay and silt with scattered gravel and cobbles to the pit depth of 10 feet. No free water was observed in the pits at the time of excavation and the soils were slightly moist to moist. Subsidence Potential: Bedrock of the Pennsylvanian age Eagle Valley Evaporite underlies the Los Adobes Subdivision at depth. These rocks are a sequence of gypsiferous shale, fine-grained sandstone and siltstone with some massive beds of gypsum and limestone. There is a possibility that massive gypsum deposits associated with the Eagle Valley Evaporite underlie portions of the lot. Dissolution of the gypsum under certain conditions can cause sinkholes to develop and can produce areas of localized subsidence. Sinkholes were not observed in the immediate area of the subject lot. No evidence of cavities was encountered in the subsurface materials; however, the exploratory pits were relatively shallow, for foundation design only. Based on our present knowledge of the subsurface conditions at the site, it cannot be said for certain that sinkholes will not develop. The risk of future ground subsidence on Lot 2 throughout the service life of the proposed residence, in our opinion, is low; however, the owner should be made aware of the potential for sinkhole development. If further investigation of possible cavities in the subsurface below the site is desired, we should be contacted. Foundation Recommendations: Considering the subsurface conditions encountered in the exploratory pits and the nature of the proposed construction, we recommend spread footings placed on the undisturbed bedrock designed for an allowable bearing pressure of 4,000 psf for support of the proposed residence. The upper soils tend to compress after wetting and should be removed from the building foundation area. Footings should H P GEOTECH Ken Thorne October 27, 1998 Page 3 be a minimum width of 16 inches for continuous walls and 2 feet for columns. Loose and disturbed soils and existing fill encountered at the foundation bearing level within the excavation should be removed and the footing bearing level extended down to the undisturbed bedrock. Exterior footings should be provided with adequate cover above their bearing elevations for frost protection. Placement of footings at least 36 inches below the exterior grade is typically used in this area. Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span local anomalies such as by assuming an unsupported length of at least 10 feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining structures should be designed to resist a lateral earth pressure based on an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 50 pcf for the on-site soil as backfill. Floor Slabs: The undisturbed bedrock is suitable to support lightly loaded slab -on - grade construction. To reduce the effects of some differential movement, the upper soils should be removed and/or replaced compacted and floor slabs should be separated from all bearing walls and columns with expansion joints which allow unrestrained vertical movement. Floor slab control joints should be used to reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking. The requirements for joint spacing and slab reinforcement should be established by the designer based on experience and the intended slab use. A minimum 4 inch layer of free -draining gravel should be placed beneath basement level slabs to facilitate drainage. This material should consist of minus 2 inch aggregate with less than 50% passing the No. 4 sieve and less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve. All fill materials for support of floor slabs should be compacted to at least 95 % of maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Required fill can consist of the on-site clay and gravel soils or imported road base gravel devoid of vegetation, topsoil and oversized rock. Underdrain System: Although free water was not encountered during our exploration, it has been our experience in mountainous areas where bedrock is shallow that local perched groundwater can develop during times of heavy precipitation or seasonal runoff. Frozen ground during spring runoff can also create a perched condition. We recommend below -grade construction, such as retaining walls, crawlspace and basement areas, be protected from wetting and hydrostatic pressure buildup by an underdrain system. H -P GEOTECH Ken Thorne October 27, 1998 Page 4 The drains should consist of drainpipe placed in the bottom of the wall backfill surrounded above the invert level with free -draining granular material. The drain should be placed at each level of excavation and at least 1 foot below lowest adjacent finish grade and sloped at a minimum 1% to a suitable gravity outlet. Free -draining granular material used in the underdrain system should contain less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve, less than 50% passing the No. 4 sieve and have a maximum size of 2 inches. The drain gravel backfill should be at least 1'/2 feet deep. Surface Drainage: The following drainage precautions should be observed during construction and maintained at all times after the residence has been completed: 1) Inundation of the foundation excavations and underslab areas should be avoided during construction. 2) Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and compacted to at least 95 % of the maximum standard Proctor density in pavement and slab areas and to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density in landscape areas. Free -draining wall backfill should be capped with about 2 feet of the on-site, finer graded soils to reduce surface water infiltration. 3) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions. We recommend a minimum slope of 12 inches in the first 10 feet in unpaved areas and a minimum slope of 3 inches in the first 10 feet in pavement and walkway areas. A swale may be needed uphill to direct surface runoff around the residence. 4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill. Limitations: This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no warranty either expressed or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the exploratory pits excavated at the locations indicated on Fig. 1 and to the depths shown on Fig. 2, the proposed type of construction, and our experience in the area. Our findings include interpolation and extrapolation of the subsurface conditions identified at the exploratory pits and variations in the subsurface conditions may not become evident until excavation is performed. If conditions encountered during construction appear different from those H -P GEOTECH Ken Thorne October 27, 1998 Page 5 described in this report, we should be notified at once so re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes. We are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. As the project evolves, we should provide continued consultation and field services during construction to review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations, and to verify that the recommendations have been appropriately interpreted. Significant design changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommendations presented herein. We recommend on-site observation of excavations and foundation bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a representative of the geotechnical engineer. If you have any questions or if we may be of further assistance, please let us know. Sincerely, HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. 000 0qi l !R'4n fief • k). E ffq ' / q Daniel E. Hardin, P.E. 0 24443 Reviewed By: .6% /O/7lr�g�.e� " '••....••' G\` 4 a N eft Steven L. Pawlak, P. DEH/ksm attachments cc: Timberline Engineers - Attn: Dave Powell Bob Nelson H -P GEOTECH LOT 3 \°A° '1000 990 9g0 0,011e..t1•••••• PIT I 910 LOT 4 PIT 2 IPIT 1 I. �I ��SEMEN U 990 EXISTING DIRT 1980 ROAD 910 PROFILE PIT LOT 2 LOT 1 960 PROPERTY BOUNDARY APPROXIMATE SCALE 1" = 50' 198 697 HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL., INC_ LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS Fig. 1 Depth — Feet 0 5 10 LEGEND: Isi 1- _ F Disturbed bulk sample. __ PIT 1 ELEV. = 981' WC=3.5 DD=85 —200=41 WC=7.4 DD=88 PIT 2 ELEV. = 983' //I FILL; upper 1 1/2 feet was 3/4" roadbase. PIT 3 PROFILE PIT ELEV. = 1010' ELEV. = 967' 0 5 10 Lower 1 1/2 feet was on—site sandy clay and silt. CLAY AND SILT (CL—ML); sandy with scattered brown to brown. TOPSOIL; clay and silt, organic, medium stiff, slightly moist to dry, brown. SANDSTONE BLOCKS (GM); with a gravelly silt and sand matrix, medium dense, slightly moist to dry, reddish brown. 2" Diameter hand driven liner sample. 1 NOTES: 1. Exploratory pits were excavated on Practical refusal to backhoe. ra grovel and cobbles. stiff, slightly moist, reddish SiLTSTONE BEDROCK: weathered to hard, gray. slightly moist to dry, fractured. Eagle Valley Formation SANDSTONE AND SILTSTONE BEDROCK; weathered to hard, slightly moist, red to reddish gray. Maroon Formation October 14, 1998 with a CAT 426E 4x4 backhoe. 2. Locations of exploratory pits were measured approximately by taping from features on the plan provided. 3. Elevations of exploratory pits were based on topographic lines on the site plan provided and were by hand level. 4. The exploratory pit locations and elevations should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. 5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory pit logs represent the approximate boundaries between material types and transitions may be gradual. 6. No free water was encountered in the pits at the time of excavating. Fluctuations in water level may occur with time. 7. Laboratory Testing Results: WC = Water Content () DD = Dry Density ( pcf ) —200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve site checked 198 697 HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. LOGS OF EXPLORATORY PITS Fig. 2 r 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 N 7 c 0 2 8 0 E 0 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Moisture Content = 3.5 percent Dry Density Weight = 85 pcf Sample of: Sandy Clay and Silt with Rock Fragments From: Boring 1 at 4 Feet Compression upon wetting 0.1 198 697 1.0 10 APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf 100 HEPWORTH — PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. SWELL—CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Fig. 3 U Z N U w 2 °C 2 WN H O } W —o • J CO cr • Q `I~a J o /N cc cc Q o 2 a• cr) 2 • k a vi 4 • N 1 c.g x § co 1 M r- LOS ADOBES HOME OWNERS ASSOCIATION KEN THORNE PO BOX 812544 BOCA RATON FL 33481 DEAR KEN, AS PER OUR DISCUSSION ON MONDAY JULY 12 PLEASE ACCEPT THIS LETTER AS APPROVAL TO PROCEED WITH YOUR UTILITY TRENCHING AND SEPTIC SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT. IN ADDITION THE ARCHITECTURAL COMMITTEE IS IN AGREEMENT THAT YOU HAVE MET THE BY LAWS REQUIREMENT IN LOCATING YOUR FOUNDATION APPROPRIATELY WITH IN THE BUILDING ENVELOPE. FOUNDATION CONSTRUCTION MAY COMMENCE AS YOU DESIRE. WITH RESPECT TO THE BUILDING PLANS SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL ON JULY 8th WE REGRET TO INFORM YOU OF OUR INABILITY TO APPROVE THE FLOOR PLAN SUBMITTED. AS YOU KNOW THE BY LAWS CALL FOR SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS WITH IN THE DEVELOPMENT. IN SEEKING ADVICE FROM THE GARFIELD BUILDING DEPARTMENT THEY HAVE INFORMED US THAT YOUR PLANS DO NOT MEET THIS DEFINITION. THE FIRST FLOOR OF THE HOUSE SHOWS A COMPLETE KITCHEN AND A BEDROOM WITH CLOSETS THAT MAY BE SEPARATED FROM THE REST OF THE HOUSE BY PARTITIONS AND DOORS. THESE CRITERIA COLLECTIVELY CREATE A SEPARATE LIVING AREA AND THEREFORE PLACE THE RESIDENCE IN A NON SINGLE FAMILY DEFINITION. I AM SORRY I DID NOT PICK UP ON THIS EARLIER AS I HAD A SIMILAR PROBLEM IN MY FLOOR PLAN. UNFORTUNATELY FOR ME IT REQUIRED AN EXTENSIVE RE VAMP OF MY PLAN AND SOME DEMOLITION OF WORK ALREADY IN PROGRESS. MOVING FORWARD, YOUR PLAN IS QUITE COMPLETE AND LOOKS GREAT. AREAS NOT ADDRESSED ON THE PLANS BUT COVERED VERBALLY THAT WE WILL NEED DOCUMENTATION FOR ARE: COLOR OF STUCCO OR EXTERIOR FINISH. WINDOW SCHEDULE AND EXTERIOR COLOR OF TRIM / MOLDING. COLOR AND TYPE OF PIPE OR COVERING OF WINDOW AWNINGS. DETAILS DEPICTING PROPOSED RADIUS OF ALL CORNERS AND PARAPET. AT THE REQUEST OF THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT WE HAVE FORWARDED A COPY OF THIS LETTER TO DON OWENS, CHIEF BUILDING INSPECTOR. I HAVE WORKED WITH DON IN THE PAST AND FOUND HIM VERY HELPFUL IN EXPLAINING THE NUANCES OF THE BUILDING CODES AND RESTRICTIONS. LOOKING FORWARD TO YOUR REVISIONS AND DETAILS OF THE REQUESTS OUTLINED ABOVE. SINCERELY BRYAN WIGHT RECEIVED JUL 1 6 1999 GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING 970-945-8212 MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS for SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING CONSTRUCTION including NEW CONSTRUCTION ADDITIONS ALTERATIONS and MOVED BUILDINGS In order to understand the scope of the work intended under a permit application and expedite the issuance of a permit it is important that complete information be provided. Adequate and complete information will prevent delays in the plan review process. Reviewing a plan and the discovery that required information has not been provided by the applicant may result in the delay of the permit issuance and in proceeding with building construction. The owner or contractor may be required to provide this information before the plan review may proceed. This causes delays because other plans that are in line for review may be given attention before the new information may be reviewed after it has been provided to the Building Department. Please review this document to determine if you have enough information to design your project and provide adequate information to facilitate a plan review. If you do not, it may be helpful to obtain a book titled "Dwelling Construction under the Uniform Building Code". This book is available to you through this department at our cost. Also, please consider using a design professional for assistance in your design and a construction professional for construction of your project. To provide for a more understandable plan in order to determine compliance with the building, plumbing and mechanical codes, applicants are requested to review the following check list prior to and during design. Applicants are required to indicate appropriately and to submit the completed check list at time of application for a permit. 1 January 1, 1999 Plans to be included for a Building Permit, must be on drafting paper at least 18"x24" and drawn to scale. Plans must include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations all sides with decks, balcony, steps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the finish grade line. A section showing in detail, from the bottom of the footing to the top of the roof, including re -bar, anchor bolts, pressure treated plates, floor joists, wall studs and spacing, insulation, sheating, house - rap, (which is required), siding or any approved building material. A window schedule. A door schedule. A floor framing plan, a roof framing plan, roof must be designed to withstand a 40# per ft. up to 7,000 F.O.S. and an 80 M.P.H. wind. All sheets to be identified by number and indexed. All of the above requirements must be met or your plans will be returned. 1. Is a site plan included that indicates the distances of the proposed building or addition to property lin5s, other buildings, setback easements and utility easements? Yes V 2. Does the site plan include the location of the I.S.D.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System) and the distances to property lines, wells (on subject property and adjacent properties), streams or water courses? Yes (,,Pe -GAM) fitd 3. Does the site plan indicate the location and direction of the County or private road accessing the property? Yes 7l Q -PW-0-20�1 4. Do Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all reinforcing steel in accordance with the uniform building code or per stamped engineered design? Yes 1 fir- Q 6 y ! 5. Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl spaces and the clearances required between wood and earth? Yes '/ 2 6. Do the plans indicate the size and location of ventilation openings for the attic, roofjoist spacess and soffits? Yes 7. Do the plans include design loads as required by Garfield County for roof snow loads, (a minimum of 40 pounds per square foot up to & including 7,000 feet above sea level), floor loads and wind loads? Yes_ fee «v1 e * tic e44-4-4" 8. Does the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor and roof construction?' Yes 9. Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists, wall studs, ceiling joists, roof rafters or joists or trusses? Yes Cet. p be () 10. Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method of positive connection of all columns and beams? f Yes S Cri j'inxreg4 e i;)r (4P -k, 11. Does the plan indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the highest point of the building or addition measured at mid span between the ridge and the eave down to existing grade cont urs? Yes 12. Does the plan include any stove or zero clearance fireplace planned for installation including make and model d Colorado Phase II certifications or phase II EPA certification? Yes V No 13. Does the plan include a masonry fireplace including a fireplace section indicating design to comply with the Uniform Building Code Chapter 37? Yes No 14. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that egress/rescue windows from sleeping rooms and/or basements comply with the requirements of the Uniform Building Code? Yes No 15. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that windows provide natural light and ventijaation for all habitable rooms? Yes No 3 16. Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass doors, glazing immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as a walking surface; sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub enclosures and specify safety glazing for these areas? Yes V No 17. Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces, boilers and water heaters indicated on t,e plan? Yes No 18. Do you understand that if you are building on a parcel of land created by the exemption process or the subdivision process, are building plans in compliance with all plat notes and/or covenants? Yes V No 19. Do you understand that if you belong to a homeowners association, it is your responsibility to obtain written permission from the association, if required by that association, prior to submitting an application for a building permit? If you do not have written permission from the association, do you understand that the plan check fee will not be refunded should the architectural c mmittee deny or reject your building plans? Yes No 20. Will this be th only residential structure on the parcel? Yes vNo If no -Explain: 21. Have two (2) complete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the application? Yes 22. Do you understand that the minimum size a home can be on a lot is a 20ft. x 20ft.? Yes .f No 23. Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other construction lode requirements? Yes ✓ No 24. Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a final inspection bye Garfield County Building Department? Yes ,� No 25. Do you understand that approval for design and/or construction changes are required prior to the applicat7 of these changes? Yes No 4 26. Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a "Plan Review" fee from you at the time of application and that you will be required to pay the "Permit Fee" as well as any "School Impact" or "Septic System" fees required, at the time you pick up your building permit? Yes V No 27. Are you aware that twenty four (24) hour notice is required for all inspections? Inspections will be made from Battlement Mesa to West Glenwood in the mornings and from Glenwood Springs to Carbondale in the afternoon. Morning inspections must be called in by 12:00 p.m. the day before; afternoon inspections must be called in by 5:00 p.m. the day before. Failure to give twenty four (24) hour notice for inspections will delay your it:sisction one (1) day. Inspections are to be called in to 945-9159. Yes No 28. Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the Uniform Building Code including approval on a final inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy anoccupancy of the building? Yes �V No 29. Are you aware that the person signing the Permit Application, whether the "Owner", "Agent of the Owner", "General Contractor", "Contractor" or otherwise, is the party responsible for the project cgrhplying with the Uniform Building Code? Yes 1/ No 30. Are you aware that If you are accessing a county road and do not have an existing driveway you will reed to acquire a driveway permit from Garfield County Road and Bridge? Their phone number is 945-6111. You will need to show proof prior to the issuance of the building permit. I hereby acknowledge that I have read, understand and answered these questions to the best of my ability. signature (1-40 4 3q'C' it a/10 Phone: s6!- ITC owl (Strom 4)j )days); Project Name: �L- us, 167r- 2-4)S ' 44906wi' 1 Ci403 vm Project Address: date q-70 %? 3i3et (evenings) 5 Notes: If you have answered No on any of the questions, you may be required to provide this information at the request of the Building Official prior to beginning the plan review process. Delays in issuing the permit are to be expected. Work may not proceed without the issuance of a permit. If it is determined by the Building Official that additional information is necessary to review the application and plans to determine minimum compliance with the adopted codes, the application may be placed behind more recent applications for building permits m the review process and not reviewed until required information has been provided and the application rotates again to first position for review, delay in issuance of the permit or delay in proceeding with construction. bpminreq 6 County Road (Note the Road Number and Name) r — 0 w 03 ?; n n w = cb bo .:.. a oE. • 1, -- o CA CA Nrgr14 TH T. ?Tnryx TA`ny-T 1994 Building Cade Setbacks: 25 feet front and rear and 10 feet on the fides Snowload: 401bs. /sq. ft. up to 7000 feet Seismic: Zone 1 Windshear: 80 mph Wind exposure: B Windload: 151bs. /sq. ft. Frost Depth: 36 inches --30 inches from finished grade to top of footing (Liveload is snowload-imposed by snow) INSPECTION WILL NOT BE MADE UNLESS THIS CARD IS POSTED ON THE JOB 24 HOURS NOTICE REQUIRED FOR INSPECTIONS BUILDING PERMIT GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO Date Issued '' Zoned Area Permit No? II 7 AGREEMENT In consideration of the issuance of this permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with all laws and regulations related to the zoning, location; construction and erection of the proposed structure for which this permit is granted, and further agrees that if the above said regulations are not fully complied with in the zoning, location, erection and construction of the above described structure, the permit may then be revoked by notice from the County Building Inspect r and MEDIATELY BECOME NULL AND VOID. Use Address Legal Descri do Owner Setbacks Front Side CQnlractor Side Rear $64 This Card Must Be Posted So It is Plainly Visible From The Street Until Final Inspection. INSPECTION RECORD Footing ,3::_101:_._.,..57): `�--- /!gyp& GVarI i vi,? Foundation C73-9/ai,�, oieiz_ ts,� ' Underground Plumbing 4.. 6.0 Insulation/4 _, v • .) Rough Plumbing _<._,0J Drywall // /7.0-a .0- .-. Chimney & Vent Electric Final (b State Ins i ectorA„ _1,I 0 4 Gas Piping 1- 4 ay., Final t. -- �Q F/%/ Electric Rough (By State Inspector l Septic Final yAq� �~ Framing 0- 13 • (X? (To include Roof in place and Windows and Doors installed). Notes: / ALL LISTED ITEMS MUST BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE COVERING - WHETHER INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR, UNDERGROUND OR ABOVE GROUND. THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE Phone 945-9159 109 8th Street County Courthouse Glenwood Springs, Colorado. APPROVE D DO NOT DESTROY THIS CARD Date By ►,.Q4:** IF PLACED OUTSIDE - COVER WITH CLEAR PLASTIC From the Desk of: Ken Thorne & Sylvia Lushan Friday, March 02, 2001 To: Mr. Mark Bean Planning Director Garfield County, CO Dear Sir: This letter is to confirm our discussion of February 28th 2001 to address the issue of our approved Wet Bar and Barbeque area located on the lower level of our home at 0324 Los Adobes Drive, Carbondale, CO 81623. It is our intention to use this dwelling solely as a single family residence and to use this lower area of our home for the exclusive use of our family and or domestic help as may be required to maintain our quality of life. In the unlikely event that we should offer our property for sale we will not represent in any fashion that the property is anything other than a single family residence. Furthermore, in the event of a sale we agree to remove the stove and refrigerator. This agreement shall become null and void should we receive a use permit issued by Garfield County permitting an additional kitchen at that location. Sincerely, Sylvia Lushan Kenneth W. Thorne