HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication- PermitJob Address
r
aYas
drcf-do--7—
GARFIELD COUNTY
BUILDING, SANITATION
and PLANNING DEPARTMENT
109 8th. Street, Suite 303
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601(970) 945-8212
Nature of Work Building Permit
Use of Building
Owner
Contractor
No. 7225
�-fee_ a8165D
/4°714 -
Amount of Permits 0203 4 -7/ Date c -f /99
C
0- /fin / /1�Y!'JIL .t,� ! ` V�
Ir _ �� U-
- fi ‘___It.Clerk
f R
.GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION
GARFIELD COUNTY (GLENWOOD SPRINGS), COLORADO
TELEPHONE: (970) 945-8212
Applicant to complete numbered spaces only. PERMIT NO. '7? 25
INSPECTION LINE: (970) 945-9159
PARCEL/SCHEDULE NO.
TOB ADDRESS: .1 it 24 ? /T4 w ' c 94- Z i/ / /'re C
I
LOT NO. BLOCK NO. SUBDIVISION/FiMPTION
2
"461 'T -a4, v.- J�aJt a e' te'', G ca/leAmuse
•
e'2 ,
Nam 646:- d
3
CONT1UHIOR 0 4., et /- /`
ADDRESS
PH:
LTC NO:
4
ARCt1RECT/SNGINEER
14' 5'5 rh-A
ADDaEEa
PN:
..••••
a0 et. OF BUILDING ` va a
SQ. FT. OF LOT e 7, C t7
tuz°Etrl,p eit-
r
.•5
NO. OP FLOORS (
6
ME O MONO Ye 00 /C -0 D
7
ONS"ID8 WORK:
8
_
CIMS of NOR[: MEW DADDrrION CALM:RATION DUOVE DRFMOVE
9
/ARAB MINGLE .DOOSLE CARPORT: O&DJOLE ODOUBLE
10
o DRIVEWAY NOWT DON SITE SEWAGE DISPOSAL (SEPTIC) CRnY PLAN
YAWAt1ON OF WORK: $ ADJUSTED VALUATION:$ #/ �'� J{� / 3 , /T�
I CJ
Cl / 7
SPECIAL. COMMONS:
NOTICE
A SEPARATE ELECTRICAL PERMIT IS REQUIRED AND MUST BE ISSUED BY THE STATE OF
COLORADO.
THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL .AND VOID IF WORK OR. CONSTRUCTION
AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 180 DAYS, OR IF CONSTRUCTION OR
WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF ISO DAYS AT ANY TIME
AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION AND
KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS
GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WELL BE COMPLIED WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED
HEREIN OR NOT, THE GRANTING OF PERMIT DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE
AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR • CEL PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR
LOCAL' r • ; t r aNS CTION OR THE PE CE OF
dill
CONSTIL / + i
� ;
te
PLAN CHECK FEE:
7 fa `1/ SP
PERMIT FEE:YiP�/ �7
.1% ! rt , e�n S
TOTAL FEE: DATE PERMIT ISSUED:
$42/ 03 ,r. 71
OCC: GROUP: CONST: TYPE:
r-� „ / T% N
�/ -x---
ZONINGr.0L.,..
SETBACKS:
Si�aature . . ora . otiaed agent having - =deist. • hce bove.
Ei
i.! d& • , " ' III/ ....;.e, 4,,' I ,r
/A
` - - • HOME:
ISDS NO do FEE:
/5Q. (70
BuildingDept. Approval/Date ' IV..'Ir7. R . !. P to
AGREFIIIENT
/15
PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO THE APPLICANT AS OWNER, CONTRACTOR AND,OR THE AGENT OF THE CONTRACTOR OR OWNER TO CONSTRUCT THE STRUCTURE A:.
DETAILED ON PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SUBMITTED TO AND REVIEWED BY THE BUIDLNGDEPARTMENT.
IN CONSIDERATION OF THE ISSUANCE OF TIES PERMTT, THE SIGNER HEREBY ACWEES TO COMPLY WITH AIL BUILDING CODES AND LAND USE REGULATIONS ADOPTED B1
GARFIELD COUNTY PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GIVEN IN 30.26.201 CRS AS AMENDED. THE SIGNER FURTHER AGREES THAT IF THE ABOVE SAID ORDINANCES ARE NOT FULL'
COMPLIED WITH EN THE LOCATION, ERECTION, CONSTRUCTION AND USE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED STRUCTURE, THE PERMIT' MAY THEN BE REVOKED BY NOTICE FROM
'THE COUNTY AND THAT THEN AND THERE IT SHALL BECOME NULL AND VOID.
THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT BASED UPON PIANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA SHALL NOT PREVENT THE BUILDING OFFICIAL FROM THEREAFTER REQUIPJNO TIE
CORRECTION OF ERRORS IN SAID PIANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA OR FRO PREVENTING BUILDING OPERATION BEING CARRIED ON THEREUNDER WHEN 11'
VIOLATION OF THIS CODE OR ANY OTHER ORDINANCE OR REGULATION OF MIS JURISDICTION.
THE REVIEW OF THE SUBMITTED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND INSPECTIONS CONDUCTED THEREAFTER DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN
RESPONSIBILITIES OR LIABILITIES BY GARFIELD COUNTY FOR ERRORS, OMLSSIONS OR DISCREPANCIES. THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THESE ITEMS
DURING CONSTRUCTION RESTS SPECIFICALLY WITH THE ARCHITECT, DESIGNER,BUILDER AND OWNER. COMMENTS ARE. INTENDED TO Aird •
OF THE OWNERS INTEREST.
eo3 1 HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE AGREEMENT ABOVE. Ma Jai L
ACCEPTANCE OF AN1
IMP EMENTATIO"
AND IN SUPPORT
4/Vg
The following items are required by Garfield County for a final inspection:
1. A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector;
2. Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department posted where readily
visible from access road;
3. A finished roof, a lockable house, complete exterior siding, exterior doors and windows
installed, a complete kitchen with cabinets, a sink with hot & cold running water, non-absorbent
kitchen floor coverings, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove and refrigerator, all
necessary plumbing; _
4. A complete bathroom, with wash bowl, tub or shower, toilet stool, hot and cold running
water, non-absorbent floors and walls finished and a privacy door;
5, All steps outside or inside over three (3) steps must have handrails, guard rails on balconies or
decks over 30" high constructed to all 1994 UBC requirements;
6. Outside grading done to where water will detour away from the building;
7. Exceptions to the outside steps, decks and grading may be made upon the demonstration of
extenuating circumstances, i.e. weather, but a Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until all
the required items are completed and a final inspection made.
A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE ABOVE
ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED.
* * * *CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY
(C.O.) IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL BE
CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATION
PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET.
I understand and agree to abi • e by the above conditions for occupancy., use and the issuance of a
Certificate of Occu • cy fo e dwelling under building permit #
Si
bpco
Date
O.
POWER
EQUIPMENT COMPANY
DENVER
303-288-6801
303-288-6809 FAX
800-883-9284
GRAND JUNCTION
303-243-0722
303-243-0726 FAX
800-898-7319
CASPER
307-577-9700
307-577-9703 FAX
800-883-9275
ALBUQUERQUE
505-344-9466
505-345-4715 FAX
800-880-2320
CEDARAPIDS • CHAMPION • EL JAY • EAGLE • EUCLID • HITACHI • HYPAC
PREMIER -PEERLESS • RAMMER • VOLVO CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT
ACCESSORY LINES
BRUNNER & LAY • BUCYRUS BLADES • COLUMBIA STEEL • CUMMINS
DIPACO • HELSER MACHINE PARTS • INTERTRACTOR • IRATHANE SYSTEMS
KAWASAKI • LUDLOW-SAYLOR • MINNPAR • SPOKANE STEEL FOUNDRY
SUPERIOR CONVEYOR PARTS • WEG ELECTRIC MOTORS • WESTERN WIRE
Gtech
April 30, 1999
Jon Wilson
24207 Highway 6 & 24
Rifle, Colorado 81650
Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc.
5020 County Road 154
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601
I'hone:970-945-7988
Fax: 970-945-8454
hpgeo@hpgeotech.com
Job No. 199 319
Subject: Subsoil Study for Foundation Design, Proposed Commercial Building,
24207 Highway 6 & 24, Garfield County, Colorado.
Dear Mr. Wilson:
As requested, Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. performed a subsoil study for
design of foundations at the subject site. The study was conducted in accordance with
our agreement for geotechnical engineering services to you dated April 8, 1999. The
data obtained and our recommendations based on the proposed construction and
subsurface conditions encountered are presented in this report.
Proposed Construction: The proposed construction will be 11/2 story steel building
located on the site as shown on Fig. 1. Ground floor will be slab -on -grade. Cut depths
are expected to range between about 2 to 3 feet. Up to about 2 feet of fill is planned for
the southern portion of the site to obtain a level building pad. Foundation loadings for
this type of construction are assumed to be relatively light wall loads with moderate
column loads, typical of the proposed type of construction.
If building conditions or foundation loadings are significantly different from those
described above, we should be notified to re-evaluate the recommendations presented in
this report.
Site Conditions: The area of the proposed building is being used as a parking area and
is covered with road base. A 1 story masonry building with slab -on -grade floor is
located to the east of the proposed building. No apparent distress to the existing
building was reported to us. The ground surface is relatively flat with a slight slope
down to the southwest. There is about 1 to 2 feet of elevation difference across the site.
Vegetation consists of sparse grass and weeds.
Subsurface Conditions: The subsurface conditions at the site were evaluated by
excavating two exploratory pits at the approximate locations shown on Fig. 1. The logs
of the pits are presented on Fig. 2. The subsoils encountered, below about 1 foot of
Jon Wilson
April 30, 1999
Page 2
3/4- inch road base, consist of slightly sandy clay and silt. Results of swell -
consolidation testing performed on a relatively undisturbed sample of the clay,
presented on Fig. 3, indicate moderate to high compressibility under conditions of
loading and wetting. The sample may have been drilled during sampling. The
laboratory testing is summarized on Table 1. No free water was observed in the pits at
the time of excavation and the soils were slightly moist to moist. The subsoils in pit 2
were very moist below about 31/2 feet.
Foundation Recommendations: Considering the subsoil conditions encountered in the
exploratory pits and the nature of the proposed construction, we recommend the
building be founded with spread footings bearing on the upper natural soils designed for
an allowable soil bearing pressure of 1,000 psf. The foundation should be kept
relatively shallow to limit impacts of the deeper soft soils. The soils tend to compress
under loading and there could be some post -construction foundation settlement.
Footings should be a minimum width of 20 inches for continuous walls and 2 feet for
columns. Loose and disturbed soils and existing fill encountered at the foundation
bearing level within the excavation should be removed and the footing bearing level
extended down to the undisturbed natural soils. The exposed subgrade should be
compacted prior to placing concrete. Exterior footings should be provided with
adequate cover above their bearing elevations for frost protection. Placement of
footings at least 36 inches below the exterior grade is typically used in this area.
Continuous foundation walls should be heavily reinforced top and bottom to span local
anomalies such as by assuming an unsupported length of at least 14 feet. Foundation
walls acting as retaining structures (if any) should be designed to resist a lateral earth
pressure based on an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 55 pcf for the on-site soil as
backfill.
Floor Slabs: The natural on-site soils, exclusive of topsoil, are suitable to support
lightly loaded slab -on -grade construction. The clay and silt soils are compressible when
wetted and loaded. To reduce the effects of some differential movement, floor slabs
should be separated from all bearing walls and columns with expansion joints which
allow unrestrained vertical movement. Floor slab control joints should be used to
reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking. The requirements for joint spacing and slab
reinforcement should be established by the designer based on experience and the
intended slab use. A minimum 4 inch layer of free -draining gravel can be placed
beneath slabs -on -grade to act as a leveling surface. This material should consist of
H -P GEOTECH
Jon Wilson
April 30, 1999
Page 3
minus 2 inch aggregate with less than 50% passing the No. 4 sieve and less than 12%
passing the No. 200 sieve.
All fill materials for support of floor slabs should be compacted to at least 95 % of
maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Required fill
can consist of the on-site soils devoid of vegetation and topsoil.
Surface Drainage: The following drainage precautions should be observed during
construction and maintained at all times after the building has been completed:
1) Inundation of the foundation excavations and underslab areas should be
avoided during construction.
2) Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and
compacted to at least 95 % of the maximum standard Proctor density in
pavement and slab areas and to at least 90% of the maximum standard
Proctor density in landscape areas.
3) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be
sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions. We
recommend a minimum slope of 6 inches in the first 10 feet in unpaved
areas and a minimum slope of 3 inches in the first 10 feet in pavement
and walkway areas.
4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of
all backfill.
Limitations: This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted
geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no
warranty either expressed or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted
in this report are based upon the data obtained from the exploratory pits excavated at the
locations indicated on Fig. 1 and to the depths shown on Fig. 2, the proposed type of
construction, and our experience in the area. Our findings include interpolation and
extrapolation of the subsurface conditions identified at the exploratory pits and
variations in the subsurface conditions may not become evident until excavation is
performed. If conditions encountered during construction appear different from those
described in this report, we should be notified at once so re-evaluation of the
recommendations may be made.
H -P GEOTECH
Jon Wilson
April 30, 1999
Page 4
This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes.
We are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. As
the project evolves, we should provide continued consultation and field services during
construction to review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations, and to
verify that the recommendations have been appropriately interpreted. Significant design
changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommendations
presented herein. We recommend on-site observation of excavations and foundation
bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a representative of the geotechnical
engineer.
If you have any questions or if we may be of further assistance, please let us know.
Sincerely,
HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOT �.; �,� L, INC.
Jordy Z. Adam
Reviewed By:
aniel E.
JZA/ksm
attachments
•
•
on,
ardor P.
c)40,.f2
H -P GEOTECH
NOT TO SCALE
US HIGHWAY 6 AND 24
ji
-PROPERTY
BOUNDARIES
PIT 1
■
.
PIT 2
PROPOSED
BUILDING
EXISTING
BUILDING
r--1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
L_ _ J
199 319
HEPWORTH - PAWLAK
GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY PITS
J.
Fig. 1
Depth — Feet
�—. 10
LEGEND:
-7
1
ISI
PIT 1 PIT 2
NORTHEAST BUILDING CORNER SOUTHWEST BUILDING CORNER
WC- 8.7
DD -94
-200=95
z9 WC=14.3
Da -108
FILL; 3/4 inch road base.
WC=18.7
DD -107
5
10
SILT AND CLAY (ML --CL): sandy, medium stiff in Pit 1 and medium stiff to soft with depth
in Pit 2, slightly moist to moist, very moist with depth in Pit 2, brown.
2" Diameter hand driven liner sample.
NOTES:
1. Exploratory pits were excavated on April 20, 1999 with a backhoe.
2. Locations of exploratory pits were based on building corners marked in the field.
3. Elevations of exploratory pits were not measured and logs of exploratory pits are drown to depth.
Pit 1 is about 1.5 feet higher in elevation than Pit 2.
4. The exploratory pit locations should be considered accurate only to the degree
implied by the method used.
5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory pit logs represent the approximate
boundaries between material types and transitions may be gradual.
6. No free water was encountered in the pits at the time of excavating. The subsoils in Pit 2 were very
moist at 6.5 feet. Fluctuations in water level may occur with time.
7. Laboratory Testing Results:
WC = Water Content ( % )
DD = Dry Density ( pcf )
—200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve
Depth — Feet
199 319
HEPWORTH - PAWLAK
GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
LOGS OF EXPLORATORY PITS
Fig. 2
Compression
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Moisture Content = 18.7 percent
Dry Density Weight = 107 pef
Sample of: Sandy Clay
From: Pit 2 at 3 Feet
No movement
upon
wetting
0.1
199 319
LO 10
APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf
HEPWORTH - PAWLAK
GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
100
SWELL -CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Fig. 3
(U
Z U)
_J J
a
C.) w
E cc
W 1--
i-
0
}
Occ
W — O
U" wE-
aoac
Q�.,O
4
-Ja
0
H cc
oC a
2
a cnn
w
1
t
o
a
N
Slightly Sandy Silt
co
U
c
co
u)
co
U
A
.8
c
co
ligit
r
a)
0)
g
1
li
d
a)
co
0
n
0
.q i i '
n
c
r
co
4
(0
n
ca
co
N
Corporate Office
18933 Aldine Westfield
Houston, TX 77073
Tel (281) 443-9065
Fax (281) 443-9064
Toll Free (888) 467-4443
MAY 20, 1999
WESTAR, INC
ATTN: STEVE KESSLER
448 WIL AVENUE
RIFLE, CO. 81650
RIGID
BUILDING SYSTEMS
RE: THE INSULATION COMPANY
JOB #W9-0227
JOBSITE: RIFLE, CO.
Mr. Kessler,
10 Inverness Drive East
Suite 101
Englewood, CO 80111
Tel (303) 799-4579
Fax (303) 799-4803
Toll Free (800) 658-2885
This building was designed using Seismic zone 2B, which is more conservative than if
Seismic zone 1 will be used. Please be aware also that the Seismic load in combination with
dead load does not control the design of the building, but dead load plus live load does.
Therefore, Rigid Building Systems, Incorporated certifies that changing the Seismic load from
zone 2 to zone 1 will have no impact on the structural design of this building,
Sincerely,
Frederick J. Campana
Professional Engineer
1
i
.3je
1'5.76
IRRIGATION DITCH
-12
FENCE AND
1.46 ACRES
PROPOSED
BUILDING
50.00'
.3
N 79'58'32"
1p1.15
70
87'50'0" W
180. 0
HIGHWAY 6 & 24
71
0' 50' 100' 150'
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Lot 12 and the west 30 feet of even width of Lot 11, Block 6.
That portion of Lot la Block 5, lying westerly of the southerly extension of the east line
of the west 30 feet of said Lot 11, and lying northerly of the north amended map of
Blyton subdivision.
ALSO all that portion of Western Avenue contiguous to the above property lying west of
the southerly extension of the east line of the west 30 feet of Lot 11, Block 6; as vacated
by the Board of County Commissioners of Garfield County by document recorded
October 31. 16--967, in Book 389 at Page 389 as Reception No. 239364, County of
Garfield.
RI ARD L �� ' MAN
prof s Land .9irrir tr Jona Noma* Whoa Pr+we &
LS 13501
RUM
4713 214 Rid Wouedo
787V-2947() ADA7E. 5/11/0DjPftcu 99048 I MWLSOMONV
lb. ittoolocite,,
GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING
MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS
for
CONSTRUCTION OF
COMMERCIAL OR MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS
including
NEW CONSTRUCTION
ADDITIONS
ALTERATIONS
and
MOVED BUILDINGS
In order to understand the scope of the work intended under a permit
application and expedite the issuance of a permit it is important that
complete information be provided. Adequate and complete information will
prevent delays in the plan review process. Reviewing a plan and the
discovery that required information has not been provided by the applicant
may result in the delay of the permit issuance and in proceeding with
building construction. The owner or contractor may be required to provide
this information before the plan review may proceed. This causes delays
because other plans that are in line for review may be given attention before
the new information may be reviewed after it has been provided to the
Building Department.
Please review this document to determine if you have enough
information to design your project and provide adequate information to
facilitate a plan review. If you do not, it may be helpful to obtain a book
titled "Dwelling construction under the Uniform Building Code. This
book is available to you through this department at our cost. Also,
please consider using a design professional for assistance in your
design and a construction professional for construction of your project.
To provide for a more understandable plan in order to determine
compliance with the building, plumbing and mechanical codes, applicants
are requested to review the following check list prior to and during design.
Applicants are required to indicate appropriately and to submit completed
check list at time of application for a permit:
1. Is a site plan included that indicates the distance of the proposed
building or addition to property lines, other buildings, set back
easements and utility easements?
Yes __kZ No u, Not necessary for this project (21
2. Are the plans submitted for application construction drawings and not
drawings that are stamped or marked identifying them as "Not for
construction, for permit issuance only", "Approval drawings only", "For
permit issuance only" or similar language?
Yes __V._ No („ Not necessary for this project (2)
3. Does the site plan include the location, including the distances to
property lines, wells (on subject property and adjacent properties) ,
streams or water courses of the I.S.D.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal
System) and has the system been designed, stamped and signed by a
Colorado,registered engineer?
Yes __V No (() Not necessary for this project (2)
4. Does the site plan indicate the location and direction of the State, County
or private road accessing the property?
Yes __Z_ No („ Not necessary for this project (2)
5. Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and
spacing of all reinforcing steel in accordance with the uniform building
code or per stamped engineered design?
Yes _ No (() Not necessary for this project (2)
6. If the building is a pre-engineered structure, is there a stamped, signed
engineer foundation plan for this building?
Yes __ No u, Not necessary for this project (2)
7. Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for
under floor crawl spaces and the clearances required between wood and
earth?
Yes No (u Not necessary for this project ,„,a[__(2)
8. Do the plans indicate the size an location of ventilation openings for the
attic, roof joist spaces and soffits?
Yes No (() Not necessary for this project __
2
9. Do the plans include design loads as required under the Uniform
Building code for roof snow loads, ( a minimum of 40 pounds per
square soot in Garfield County)?
Yes __pe..... No (1) Not necessary for this project (2)
10. Do the plans include design loads as required for floor loads under
Uniformfluilding Code Section 2304 and Tables 23-A and 23-B?
Yes �V' No 0) Not necessary for this project (2)
11. Does the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation,
wall, floor and roof construction?
Yes _ _ No n) Not necessary for this project (2)
12. ;Is the w}i �d speed and exposure design included in the plan?
Yes _1Z_ No (1) Not necessary for this project (z)
13. Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor
joists, will studs, ceiling joists, roof rafters or joists or trusses?
Yes __14.No (1) Not necessary for this project (2)
14. Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method of
positive yonnection of all columns and beams?
Yes _AL, No (1) Not necessary for this project (2)
15. Does the plan indicate the height of the building or proposed addition
from the highest point of the building or addition measured at mid span
betweeyie ridge and the eave down to existing grade contours?
Yes No 0) Not necessary for this project (2)
16. Does the plan include any stove or zero clearance fireplace planned for
installation including make and model and Colorado Phase 11
certifications or phase II EPA certification?
Yes No a) Not necessary for this project 442,
17. Does the plan include a masonry fireplace including a fireplace section
indicating design to comply with the Uniform Building Code Cha er 37?
Yes No (1) Not necessary for this project __t
18. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that
egress/rescue windows from sleeping rooms and/or basements comply
with the requirements of the Uniform Building Code?
Yes No 0) Not necessary for this project (z>
19. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that
3
windows rovide natural light and ventilation for all habitable rooms?
Yes __Z No (() Not necessary for this project (2)
20. Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact
such as glass doors, glazing immediately adjacent to such doors;
glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as a walking surface;
sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub enclosures
and specify safety glazing for these areas? /'
Yes No (1) Not necessary for this project ___ (2)
21. Do the plans include a complete design for all mechanical systems
planned jor installation in this building?
Yes __ No (1) Not necessary for this project (2)
22. Have all areas in the building been accurately identified for the intended
use? (Occupancy as identified in the Uniform Building Code Table 5-A)
Yes __AZ No (1) Not necessary for this project (2)
23. Does the plan indicate the quantity, form, use and storage of any
hazardous materials that may be in use in this building?
Yes No (1) Not necessary for this project '✓)
24. Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces, boilers
and water heaters indicated on the plan?
Yes _ ,„Z. No (1) Not necessary for this project (2)
25. Do the plans indicate the location and dimension of restroom facilities
and if more that four employees and both sexes are employed, facilities
for both sexes?
Yes No (1) Not necessary for this project __ _(2)
26. Do the plans indicate that restrooms and access to the building are
handicapped accessible?
Yes __k No (u Not necessary for this project (2)
27. Have two (2) complete sets of constructions drawings been submitted
with the plication?
Yes __Z No (1) Not necessary for this project (2)
28. Have you esigned or had this plan designed while considering building
and oth . construction code requirements?
Yes No (3)
29. Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and
4
what will receive a final inspection by the Garfield County Building
Department?
Yes __ No c3,
30. Do you understand that approval for design and/or construction
changes jare required prior to the implementation of these changes?
Yes __ No (3)
31. Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a "Plan
Review" fee from you at the time of application and that you will be
required to pay the "Permit Fee" as well as any "Septic system " fees
requiredvat the time you pick up your building permit?
Yes __Z No (3)
32. Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required
under the Uniform Building Code including approval on a final
inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy and occupancy
of the budding?
Yes No (3)
33. Are you aware that the person signing the Permit Application whether the
"Owner", "Agent of the Owner", "General Contractor", "Contractor" or
otherwise, signing the application is the party responsible for the
project cpmplying with the Uniform Codes".
Yes __ No c3,
I hereby acknowledge that I have read, understand and answered these
questions accurately to the best of my ability.
sigO,
U(
Phone:6a5-Ofic-- (days); &X ----(9-3S0 (evenings)
>>
DID.67 / `7 1 -(Es_
alfoit7 fi0L-4-60
1
Project Name:
Project Address:
(Refer to notes on next page)
5
Notes:
(1)
If you have answered "No" on any of these questions you may be required
to provide this information at the request of the Building Official prior
to beginning the plan review process. Delays in issuing the permit are
to be expected. Work may not proceed without the issuance of the
permit.
(2) if you have answered "Not necessary for this project" on any of the
questions and it is determined by the Building Official that the
information is necessary to review the application and plans to
determine minimum compliance with the adopted codes, please expect
the following:
A. The application may be placed behind more recent applications for
building permits In the review process and not reviewed until
required information has been provided and the application
rotates again to first position for review.
B. Delay in issuance of the permit.
C. Delay in proceeding with construction.
(3) If you answered "No" to this question the circumstances described in the
question could result in a "Stop Work Order" being issued or a
"Certificate of Occupancy" not being issued.
PerApp01.94 Effective - January 1, 1995
6
INSPECTION WIR NOT Bi !MADE UNLESS
TIIIS CAN IS P051111 ON THE JOB
Y VI, 11 !CI ',.r) I IS 1 Itl 101 lit; 41. Mit lit 1 \' 1I 1 I ION',
(fate Issue
BUILDING PERMIT
GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO
Zoned Area Permit No ?c S
A(:1tEEM 1?NT
In consideration of the issuance of this permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with all
laws and regulations related to the zoning, location; construction and erection of the proposed
structure for which this hermit is granted, and further agrees that if the above said regulations
are not fully complied with in the zoning, location, erection and construction of the above
described structure, the permit may then be revoked by notice from the County Building
lnspecld IMMEDIATELY 3ECPME NUL.!. ANI) \'OII).
ko/?C4
Ise f
Address or I ,e III)escriptioly_ - a�(. /6,0 "y
g 1 3 ' � i\Contraetor
Setbacks Front . . . ..Side Side ...._Real_..—..._
This (hard Must Be Posted So 11 is Plainly Visible From The Street Urnai! Final Inspection.
MI le Co
INSPECTION RECORD ,
Footing 4 , `r.r..�r�rb '; , 4.4,`
Y,; . '�, ;, 10 .. _..
Foundation 2 , C ("" �....
Underground Plumbing 3',, ?;, y 1.:,-,.;
Iti$Ulution pk //y7f� LL„
Rough Plumbing (SIC /D)1'¢f94Dry!!
II ,i i- .. Z ."7"7-77, ,, .
Chimney & Vent .1
2 Eibett-ic Final (b St& 7' 'i, 7--00 (1
(;as Piping an -//2„s -ye i l
=�riilllllii �,f a� . ) , .•,� ..
Electric Rough (it State l J ;, to TAA( r,R:'
*1).tic Final P.977-7.:;.7 ;`/a e.<
Framing (.4<-i� *4: Itie r,
('1 n include Roof 1n,plafl as . •
and Moors installed). ,P4i
gtetsi
r,.,4
ALL 1.1S i ED I I EMS Must BE I1 iSPE C1'ED AND APPROVEI) BEFORE COVERING -
Wit: "I IIF.R INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR, UNDERGROUND OR ABOVE: GROUND.
w
THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE
Phone 945-9159 109 81h Street County Courthouse Glenwood Springs, Colorado.
APPROVED',{ 4 01 .'.,;•
�- f
Date 0 ' )f `.BY.
II PLACED 0117'S11) , V1 I'�l CLEAR PLASTIC