Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication- PermitJob Address r aYas drcf-do--7— GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING, SANITATION and PLANNING DEPARTMENT 109 8th. Street, Suite 303 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601(970) 945-8212 Nature of Work Building Permit Use of Building Owner Contractor No. 7225 �-fee_ a8165D /4°714 - Amount of Permits 0203 4 -7/ Date c -f /99 C 0- /fin / /1�Y!'JIL .t,� ! ` V� Ir _ �� U- - fi ‘___It.Clerk f R .GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION GARFIELD COUNTY (GLENWOOD SPRINGS), COLORADO TELEPHONE: (970) 945-8212 Applicant to complete numbered spaces only. PERMIT NO. '7? 25 INSPECTION LINE: (970) 945-9159 PARCEL/SCHEDULE NO. TOB ADDRESS: .1 it 24 ? /T4 w ' c 94- Z i/ / /'re C I LOT NO. BLOCK NO. SUBDIVISION/FiMPTION 2 "461 'T -a4, v.- J�aJt a e' te'', G ca/leAmuse • e'2 , Nam 646:- d 3 CONT1UHIOR 0 4., et /- /` ADDRESS PH: LTC NO: 4 ARCt1RECT/SNGINEER 14' 5'5 rh-A ADDaEEa PN: ..•••• a0 et. OF BUILDING ` va a SQ. FT. OF LOT e 7, C t7 tuz°Etrl,p eit- r .•5 NO. OP FLOORS ( 6 ME O MONO Ye 00 /C -0 D 7 ONS"ID8 WORK: 8 _ CIMS of NOR[: MEW DADDrrION CALM:RATION DUOVE DRFMOVE 9 /ARAB MINGLE .DOOSLE CARPORT: O&DJOLE ODOUBLE 10 o DRIVEWAY NOWT DON SITE SEWAGE DISPOSAL (SEPTIC) CRnY PLAN YAWAt1ON OF WORK: $ ADJUSTED VALUATION:$ #/ �'� J{� / 3 , /T� I CJ Cl / 7 SPECIAL. COMMONS: NOTICE A SEPARATE ELECTRICAL PERMIT IS REQUIRED AND MUST BE ISSUED BY THE STATE OF COLORADO. THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL .AND VOID IF WORK OR. CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 180 DAYS, OR IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF ISO DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WELL BE COMPLIED WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT, THE GRANTING OF PERMIT DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR • CEL PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL' r • ; t r aNS CTION OR THE PE CE OF dill CONSTIL / + i � ; te PLAN CHECK FEE: 7 fa `1/ SP PERMIT FEE:YiP�/ �7 .1% ! rt , e�n S TOTAL FEE: DATE PERMIT ISSUED: $42/ 03 ,r. 71 OCC: GROUP: CONST: TYPE: r-� „ / T% N �/ -x--- ZONINGr.0L.,.. SETBACKS: Si�aature . . ora . otiaed agent having - =deist. • hce bove. Ei i.! d& • , " ' III/ ....;.e, 4,,' I ,r /A ` - - • HOME: ISDS NO do FEE: /5Q. (70 BuildingDept. Approval/Date ' IV..'Ir7. R . !. P to AGREFIIIENT /15 PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO THE APPLICANT AS OWNER, CONTRACTOR AND,OR THE AGENT OF THE CONTRACTOR OR OWNER TO CONSTRUCT THE STRUCTURE A:. DETAILED ON PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SUBMITTED TO AND REVIEWED BY THE BUIDLNGDEPARTMENT. IN CONSIDERATION OF THE ISSUANCE OF TIES PERMTT, THE SIGNER HEREBY ACWEES TO COMPLY WITH AIL BUILDING CODES AND LAND USE REGULATIONS ADOPTED B1 GARFIELD COUNTY PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GIVEN IN 30.26.201 CRS AS AMENDED. THE SIGNER FURTHER AGREES THAT IF THE ABOVE SAID ORDINANCES ARE NOT FULL' COMPLIED WITH EN THE LOCATION, ERECTION, CONSTRUCTION AND USE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED STRUCTURE, THE PERMIT' MAY THEN BE REVOKED BY NOTICE FROM 'THE COUNTY AND THAT THEN AND THERE IT SHALL BECOME NULL AND VOID. THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT BASED UPON PIANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA SHALL NOT PREVENT THE BUILDING OFFICIAL FROM THEREAFTER REQUIPJNO TIE CORRECTION OF ERRORS IN SAID PIANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA OR FRO PREVENTING BUILDING OPERATION BEING CARRIED ON THEREUNDER WHEN 11' VIOLATION OF THIS CODE OR ANY OTHER ORDINANCE OR REGULATION OF MIS JURISDICTION. THE REVIEW OF THE SUBMITTED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND INSPECTIONS CONDUCTED THEREAFTER DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN RESPONSIBILITIES OR LIABILITIES BY GARFIELD COUNTY FOR ERRORS, OMLSSIONS OR DISCREPANCIES. THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THESE ITEMS DURING CONSTRUCTION RESTS SPECIFICALLY WITH THE ARCHITECT, DESIGNER,BUILDER AND OWNER. COMMENTS ARE. INTENDED TO Aird • OF THE OWNERS INTEREST. eo3 1 HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE AGREEMENT ABOVE. Ma Jai L ACCEPTANCE OF AN1 IMP EMENTATIO" AND IN SUPPORT 4/Vg The following items are required by Garfield County for a final inspection: 1. A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector; 2. Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department posted where readily visible from access road; 3. A finished roof, a lockable house, complete exterior siding, exterior doors and windows installed, a complete kitchen with cabinets, a sink with hot & cold running water, non-absorbent kitchen floor coverings, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove and refrigerator, all necessary plumbing; _ 4. A complete bathroom, with wash bowl, tub or shower, toilet stool, hot and cold running water, non-absorbent floors and walls finished and a privacy door; 5, All steps outside or inside over three (3) steps must have handrails, guard rails on balconies or decks over 30" high constructed to all 1994 UBC requirements; 6. Outside grading done to where water will detour away from the building; 7. Exceptions to the outside steps, decks and grading may be made upon the demonstration of extenuating circumstances, i.e. weather, but a Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until all the required items are completed and a final inspection made. A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. * * * *CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (C.O.) IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATION PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET. I understand and agree to abi • e by the above conditions for occupancy., use and the issuance of a Certificate of Occu • cy fo e dwelling under building permit # Si bpco Date O. POWER EQUIPMENT COMPANY DENVER 303-288-6801 303-288-6809 FAX 800-883-9284 GRAND JUNCTION 303-243-0722 303-243-0726 FAX 800-898-7319 CASPER 307-577-9700 307-577-9703 FAX 800-883-9275 ALBUQUERQUE 505-344-9466 505-345-4715 FAX 800-880-2320 CEDARAPIDS • CHAMPION • EL JAY • EAGLE • EUCLID • HITACHI • HYPAC PREMIER -PEERLESS • RAMMER • VOLVO CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT ACCESSORY LINES BRUNNER & LAY • BUCYRUS BLADES • COLUMBIA STEEL • CUMMINS DIPACO • HELSER MACHINE PARTS • INTERTRACTOR • IRATHANE SYSTEMS KAWASAKI • LUDLOW-SAYLOR • MINNPAR • SPOKANE STEEL FOUNDRY SUPERIOR CONVEYOR PARTS • WEG ELECTRIC MOTORS • WESTERN WIRE Gtech April 30, 1999 Jon Wilson 24207 Highway 6 & 24 Rifle, Colorado 81650 Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. 5020 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 I'hone:970-945-7988 Fax: 970-945-8454 hpgeo@hpgeotech.com Job No. 199 319 Subject: Subsoil Study for Foundation Design, Proposed Commercial Building, 24207 Highway 6 & 24, Garfield County, Colorado. Dear Mr. Wilson: As requested, Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. performed a subsoil study for design of foundations at the subject site. The study was conducted in accordance with our agreement for geotechnical engineering services to you dated April 8, 1999. The data obtained and our recommendations based on the proposed construction and subsurface conditions encountered are presented in this report. Proposed Construction: The proposed construction will be 11/2 story steel building located on the site as shown on Fig. 1. Ground floor will be slab -on -grade. Cut depths are expected to range between about 2 to 3 feet. Up to about 2 feet of fill is planned for the southern portion of the site to obtain a level building pad. Foundation loadings for this type of construction are assumed to be relatively light wall loads with moderate column loads, typical of the proposed type of construction. If building conditions or foundation loadings are significantly different from those described above, we should be notified to re-evaluate the recommendations presented in this report. Site Conditions: The area of the proposed building is being used as a parking area and is covered with road base. A 1 story masonry building with slab -on -grade floor is located to the east of the proposed building. No apparent distress to the existing building was reported to us. The ground surface is relatively flat with a slight slope down to the southwest. There is about 1 to 2 feet of elevation difference across the site. Vegetation consists of sparse grass and weeds. Subsurface Conditions: The subsurface conditions at the site were evaluated by excavating two exploratory pits at the approximate locations shown on Fig. 1. The logs of the pits are presented on Fig. 2. The subsoils encountered, below about 1 foot of Jon Wilson April 30, 1999 Page 2 3/4- inch road base, consist of slightly sandy clay and silt. Results of swell - consolidation testing performed on a relatively undisturbed sample of the clay, presented on Fig. 3, indicate moderate to high compressibility under conditions of loading and wetting. The sample may have been drilled during sampling. The laboratory testing is summarized on Table 1. No free water was observed in the pits at the time of excavation and the soils were slightly moist to moist. The subsoils in pit 2 were very moist below about 31/2 feet. Foundation Recommendations: Considering the subsoil conditions encountered in the exploratory pits and the nature of the proposed construction, we recommend the building be founded with spread footings bearing on the upper natural soils designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of 1,000 psf. The foundation should be kept relatively shallow to limit impacts of the deeper soft soils. The soils tend to compress under loading and there could be some post -construction foundation settlement. Footings should be a minimum width of 20 inches for continuous walls and 2 feet for columns. Loose and disturbed soils and existing fill encountered at the foundation bearing level within the excavation should be removed and the footing bearing level extended down to the undisturbed natural soils. The exposed subgrade should be compacted prior to placing concrete. Exterior footings should be provided with adequate cover above their bearing elevations for frost protection. Placement of footings at least 36 inches below the exterior grade is typically used in this area. Continuous foundation walls should be heavily reinforced top and bottom to span local anomalies such as by assuming an unsupported length of at least 14 feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining structures (if any) should be designed to resist a lateral earth pressure based on an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 55 pcf for the on-site soil as backfill. Floor Slabs: The natural on-site soils, exclusive of topsoil, are suitable to support lightly loaded slab -on -grade construction. The clay and silt soils are compressible when wetted and loaded. To reduce the effects of some differential movement, floor slabs should be separated from all bearing walls and columns with expansion joints which allow unrestrained vertical movement. Floor slab control joints should be used to reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking. The requirements for joint spacing and slab reinforcement should be established by the designer based on experience and the intended slab use. A minimum 4 inch layer of free -draining gravel can be placed beneath slabs -on -grade to act as a leveling surface. This material should consist of H -P GEOTECH Jon Wilson April 30, 1999 Page 3 minus 2 inch aggregate with less than 50% passing the No. 4 sieve and less than 12% passing the No. 200 sieve. All fill materials for support of floor slabs should be compacted to at least 95 % of maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Required fill can consist of the on-site soils devoid of vegetation and topsoil. Surface Drainage: The following drainage precautions should be observed during construction and maintained at all times after the building has been completed: 1) Inundation of the foundation excavations and underslab areas should be avoided during construction. 2) Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and compacted to at least 95 % of the maximum standard Proctor density in pavement and slab areas and to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density in landscape areas. 3) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions. We recommend a minimum slope of 6 inches in the first 10 feet in unpaved areas and a minimum slope of 3 inches in the first 10 feet in pavement and walkway areas. 4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill. Limitations: This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no warranty either expressed or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the exploratory pits excavated at the locations indicated on Fig. 1 and to the depths shown on Fig. 2, the proposed type of construction, and our experience in the area. Our findings include interpolation and extrapolation of the subsurface conditions identified at the exploratory pits and variations in the subsurface conditions may not become evident until excavation is performed. If conditions encountered during construction appear different from those described in this report, we should be notified at once so re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made. H -P GEOTECH Jon Wilson April 30, 1999 Page 4 This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes. We are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. As the project evolves, we should provide continued consultation and field services during construction to review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations, and to verify that the recommendations have been appropriately interpreted. Significant design changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommendations presented herein. We recommend on-site observation of excavations and foundation bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a representative of the geotechnical engineer. If you have any questions or if we may be of further assistance, please let us know. Sincerely, HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOT �.; �,� L, INC. Jordy Z. Adam Reviewed By: aniel E. JZA/ksm attachments • • on, ardor P. c)40,.f2 H -P GEOTECH NOT TO SCALE US HIGHWAY 6 AND 24 ji -PROPERTY BOUNDARIES PIT 1 ■ . PIT 2 PROPOSED BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING r--1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 L_ _ J 199 319 HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY PITS J. Fig. 1 Depth — Feet �—. 10 LEGEND: -7 1 ISI PIT 1 PIT 2 NORTHEAST BUILDING CORNER SOUTHWEST BUILDING CORNER WC- 8.7 DD -94 -200=95 z9 WC=14.3 Da -108 FILL; 3/4 inch road base. WC=18.7 DD -107 5 10 SILT AND CLAY (ML --CL): sandy, medium stiff in Pit 1 and medium stiff to soft with depth in Pit 2, slightly moist to moist, very moist with depth in Pit 2, brown. 2" Diameter hand driven liner sample. NOTES: 1. Exploratory pits were excavated on April 20, 1999 with a backhoe. 2. Locations of exploratory pits were based on building corners marked in the field. 3. Elevations of exploratory pits were not measured and logs of exploratory pits are drown to depth. Pit 1 is about 1.5 feet higher in elevation than Pit 2. 4. The exploratory pit locations should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. 5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory pit logs represent the approximate boundaries between material types and transitions may be gradual. 6. No free water was encountered in the pits at the time of excavating. The subsoils in Pit 2 were very moist at 6.5 feet. Fluctuations in water level may occur with time. 7. Laboratory Testing Results: WC = Water Content ( % ) DD = Dry Density ( pcf ) —200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve Depth — Feet 199 319 HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. LOGS OF EXPLORATORY PITS Fig. 2 Compression 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Moisture Content = 18.7 percent Dry Density Weight = 107 pef Sample of: Sandy Clay From: Pit 2 at 3 Feet No movement upon wetting 0.1 199 319 LO 10 APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. 100 SWELL -CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Fig. 3 (U Z U) _J J a C.) w E cc W 1-- i- 0 } Occ W — O U" wE- aoac Q�.,O 4 -Ja 0 H cc oC a 2 a cnn w 1 t o a N Slightly Sandy Silt co U c co u) co U A .8 c co ligit r a) 0) g 1 li d a) co 0 n 0 .q i i ' n c r co 4 (0 n ca co N Corporate Office 18933 Aldine Westfield Houston, TX 77073 Tel (281) 443-9065 Fax (281) 443-9064 Toll Free (888) 467-4443 MAY 20, 1999 WESTAR, INC ATTN: STEVE KESSLER 448 WIL AVENUE RIFLE, CO. 81650 RIGID BUILDING SYSTEMS RE: THE INSULATION COMPANY JOB #W9-0227 JOBSITE: RIFLE, CO. Mr. Kessler, 10 Inverness Drive East Suite 101 Englewood, CO 80111 Tel (303) 799-4579 Fax (303) 799-4803 Toll Free (800) 658-2885 This building was designed using Seismic zone 2B, which is more conservative than if Seismic zone 1 will be used. Please be aware also that the Seismic load in combination with dead load does not control the design of the building, but dead load plus live load does. Therefore, Rigid Building Systems, Incorporated certifies that changing the Seismic load from zone 2 to zone 1 will have no impact on the structural design of this building, Sincerely, Frederick J. Campana Professional Engineer 1 i .3je 1'5.76 IRRIGATION DITCH -12 FENCE AND 1.46 ACRES PROPOSED BUILDING 50.00' .3 N 79'58'32" 1p1.15 70 87'50'0" W 180. 0 HIGHWAY 6 & 24 71 0' 50' 100' 150' LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lot 12 and the west 30 feet of even width of Lot 11, Block 6. That portion of Lot la Block 5, lying westerly of the southerly extension of the east line of the west 30 feet of said Lot 11, and lying northerly of the north amended map of Blyton subdivision. ALSO all that portion of Western Avenue contiguous to the above property lying west of the southerly extension of the east line of the west 30 feet of Lot 11, Block 6; as vacated by the Board of County Commissioners of Garfield County by document recorded October 31. 16--967, in Book 389 at Page 389 as Reception No. 239364, County of Garfield. RI ARD L �� ' MAN prof s Land .9irrir tr Jona Noma* Whoa Pr+we & LS 13501 RUM 4713 214 Rid Wouedo 787V-2947() ADA7E. 5/11/0DjPftcu 99048 I MWLSOMONV lb. ittoolocite,, GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS for CONSTRUCTION OF COMMERCIAL OR MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS including NEW CONSTRUCTION ADDITIONS ALTERATIONS and MOVED BUILDINGS In order to understand the scope of the work intended under a permit application and expedite the issuance of a permit it is important that complete information be provided. Adequate and complete information will prevent delays in the plan review process. Reviewing a plan and the discovery that required information has not been provided by the applicant may result in the delay of the permit issuance and in proceeding with building construction. The owner or contractor may be required to provide this information before the plan review may proceed. This causes delays because other plans that are in line for review may be given attention before the new information may be reviewed after it has been provided to the Building Department. Please review this document to determine if you have enough information to design your project and provide adequate information to facilitate a plan review. If you do not, it may be helpful to obtain a book titled "Dwelling construction under the Uniform Building Code. This book is available to you through this department at our cost. Also, please consider using a design professional for assistance in your design and a construction professional for construction of your project. To provide for a more understandable plan in order to determine compliance with the building, plumbing and mechanical codes, applicants are requested to review the following check list prior to and during design. Applicants are required to indicate appropriately and to submit completed check list at time of application for a permit: 1. Is a site plan included that indicates the distance of the proposed building or addition to property lines, other buildings, set back easements and utility easements? Yes __kZ No u, Not necessary for this project (21 2. Are the plans submitted for application construction drawings and not drawings that are stamped or marked identifying them as "Not for construction, for permit issuance only", "Approval drawings only", "For permit issuance only" or similar language? Yes __V._ No („ Not necessary for this project (2) 3. Does the site plan include the location, including the distances to property lines, wells (on subject property and adjacent properties) , streams or water courses of the I.S.D.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System) and has the system been designed, stamped and signed by a Colorado,registered engineer? Yes __V No (() Not necessary for this project (2) 4. Does the site plan indicate the location and direction of the State, County or private road accessing the property? Yes __Z_ No („ Not necessary for this project (2) 5. Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all reinforcing steel in accordance with the uniform building code or per stamped engineered design? Yes _ No (() Not necessary for this project (2) 6. If the building is a pre-engineered structure, is there a stamped, signed engineer foundation plan for this building? Yes __ No u, Not necessary for this project (2) 7. Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl spaces and the clearances required between wood and earth? Yes No (u Not necessary for this project ,„,a[__(2) 8. Do the plans indicate the size an location of ventilation openings for the attic, roof joist spaces and soffits? Yes No (() Not necessary for this project __ 2 9. Do the plans include design loads as required under the Uniform Building code for roof snow loads, ( a minimum of 40 pounds per square soot in Garfield County)? Yes __pe..... No (1) Not necessary for this project (2) 10. Do the plans include design loads as required for floor loads under Uniformfluilding Code Section 2304 and Tables 23-A and 23-B? Yes �V' No 0) Not necessary for this project (2) 11. Does the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor and roof construction? Yes _ _ No n) Not necessary for this project (2) 12. ;Is the w}i �d speed and exposure design included in the plan? Yes _1Z_ No (1) Not necessary for this project (z) 13. Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists, will studs, ceiling joists, roof rafters or joists or trusses? Yes __14.No (1) Not necessary for this project (2) 14. Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method of positive yonnection of all columns and beams? Yes _AL, No (1) Not necessary for this project (2) 15. Does the plan indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the highest point of the building or addition measured at mid span betweeyie ridge and the eave down to existing grade contours? Yes No 0) Not necessary for this project (2) 16. Does the plan include any stove or zero clearance fireplace planned for installation including make and model and Colorado Phase 11 certifications or phase II EPA certification? Yes No a) Not necessary for this project 442, 17. Does the plan include a masonry fireplace including a fireplace section indicating design to comply with the Uniform Building Code Cha er 37? Yes No (1) Not necessary for this project __t 18. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that egress/rescue windows from sleeping rooms and/or basements comply with the requirements of the Uniform Building Code? Yes No 0) Not necessary for this project (z> 19. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that 3 windows rovide natural light and ventilation for all habitable rooms? Yes __Z No (() Not necessary for this project (2) 20. Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass doors, glazing immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as a walking surface; sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub enclosures and specify safety glazing for these areas? /' Yes No (1) Not necessary for this project ___ (2) 21. Do the plans include a complete design for all mechanical systems planned jor installation in this building? Yes __ No (1) Not necessary for this project (2) 22. Have all areas in the building been accurately identified for the intended use? (Occupancy as identified in the Uniform Building Code Table 5-A) Yes __AZ No (1) Not necessary for this project (2) 23. Does the plan indicate the quantity, form, use and storage of any hazardous materials that may be in use in this building? Yes No (1) Not necessary for this project '✓) 24. Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces, boilers and water heaters indicated on the plan? Yes _ ,„Z. No (1) Not necessary for this project (2) 25. Do the plans indicate the location and dimension of restroom facilities and if more that four employees and both sexes are employed, facilities for both sexes? Yes No (1) Not necessary for this project __ _(2) 26. Do the plans indicate that restrooms and access to the building are handicapped accessible? Yes __k No (u Not necessary for this project (2) 27. Have two (2) complete sets of constructions drawings been submitted with the plication? Yes __Z No (1) Not necessary for this project (2) 28. Have you esigned or had this plan designed while considering building and oth . construction code requirements? Yes No (3) 29. Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and 4 what will receive a final inspection by the Garfield County Building Department? Yes __ No c3, 30. Do you understand that approval for design and/or construction changes jare required prior to the implementation of these changes? Yes __ No (3) 31. Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a "Plan Review" fee from you at the time of application and that you will be required to pay the "Permit Fee" as well as any "Septic system " fees requiredvat the time you pick up your building permit? Yes __Z No (3) 32. Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the Uniform Building Code including approval on a final inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy and occupancy of the budding? Yes No (3) 33. Are you aware that the person signing the Permit Application whether the "Owner", "Agent of the Owner", "General Contractor", "Contractor" or otherwise, signing the application is the party responsible for the project cpmplying with the Uniform Codes". Yes __ No c3, I hereby acknowledge that I have read, understand and answered these questions accurately to the best of my ability. sigO, U( Phone:6a5-Ofic-- (days); &X ----(9-3S0 (evenings) >> DID.67 / `7 1 -(Es_ alfoit7 fi0L-4-60 1 Project Name: Project Address: (Refer to notes on next page) 5 Notes: (1) If you have answered "No" on any of these questions you may be required to provide this information at the request of the Building Official prior to beginning the plan review process. Delays in issuing the permit are to be expected. Work may not proceed without the issuance of the permit. (2) if you have answered "Not necessary for this project" on any of the questions and it is determined by the Building Official that the information is necessary to review the application and plans to determine minimum compliance with the adopted codes, please expect the following: A. The application may be placed behind more recent applications for building permits In the review process and not reviewed until required information has been provided and the application rotates again to first position for review. B. Delay in issuance of the permit. C. Delay in proceeding with construction. (3) If you answered "No" to this question the circumstances described in the question could result in a "Stop Work Order" being issued or a "Certificate of Occupancy" not being issued. PerApp01.94 Effective - January 1, 1995 6 INSPECTION WIR NOT Bi !MADE UNLESS TIIIS CAN IS P051111 ON THE JOB Y VI, 11 !CI ',.r) I IS 1 Itl 101 lit; 41. Mit lit 1 \' 1I 1 I ION', (fate Issue BUILDING PERMIT GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO Zoned Area Permit No ?c S A(:1tEEM 1?NT In consideration of the issuance of this permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with all laws and regulations related to the zoning, location; construction and erection of the proposed structure for which this hermit is granted, and further agrees that if the above said regulations are not fully complied with in the zoning, location, erection and construction of the above described structure, the permit may then be revoked by notice from the County Building lnspecld IMMEDIATELY 3ECPME NUL.!. ANI) \'OII). ko/?C4 Ise f Address or I ,e III)escriptioly_ - a�(. /6,0 "y g 1 3 ' � i\Contraetor Setbacks Front . . . ..Side Side ...._Real_..—..._ This (hard Must Be Posted So 11 is Plainly Visible From The Street Urnai! Final Inspection. MI le Co INSPECTION RECORD , Footing 4 , `r.r..�r�rb '; , 4.4,` Y,; . '�, ;, 10 .. _.. Foundation 2 , C ("" �.... Underground Plumbing 3',, ?;, y 1.:,-,.; Iti$Ulution pk //y7f� LL„ Rough Plumbing (SIC /D)1'¢f94Dry!! II ,i i- .. Z ."7"7-77, ,, . Chimney & Vent .1 2 Eibett-ic Final (b St& 7' 'i, 7--00 (1 (;as Piping an -//2„s -ye i l =�riilllllii �,f a� . ) , .•,� .. Electric Rough (it State l J ;, to TAA( r,R:' *1).tic Final P.977-7.:;.7 ;`/a e.< Framing (.4<-i� *4: Itie r, ('1 n include Roof 1n,plafl as . • and Moors installed). ,P4i gtetsi r,.,4 ALL 1.1S i ED I I EMS Must BE I1 iSPE C1'ED AND APPROVEI) BEFORE COVERING - Wit: "I IIF.R INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR, UNDERGROUND OR ABOVE: GROUND. w THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE Phone 945-9159 109 81h Street County Courthouse Glenwood Springs, Colorado. APPROVED',{ 4 01 .'.,;• �- f Date 0 ' )f `.BY. II PLACED 0117'S11) , V1 I'�l CLEAR PLASTIC