Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1.0 Application�s GARFIELD COUNTY Building & Planning Department 108 8th Street, Suite 201 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Telephone: 970.945.8212 Facsimile: 970.384.3470 www.oarfield-countv.com Subdivision Application Form > Subdivision Name: > Type of Subdivision (check one of the following types): Sketch Plan Preliminary Plan X Final Plat __ > Name of Property Owner (Applicant): wa 927-9119 > Address: 132 Park Ave. Telephone: > City: Basalt State: co Zip Code: 81601 FAX: 927-4027 GENERAL INFORMATION (To be completed by the applicant.) Overview > Name of Owner's Representative, if any (Attorney, Planner, etc): Steve Oger, Rick Oger, Gary Setnes > Addres /o s: Telephone: Rudd Construction132 ParkAve. 927-9119 > City: Basalt State: co Zip Code: 81601 FAX:927-4027 Name of Engineer: Zankanella & Associates > Address: P.0.''Bq_m_1908 Telephone: _9_4_5.-5.7 0 0 > City: Glenwood Spring_ State: CO Zip Code:$1.,6o-2- FAX:245-12. - -.- > Name of Surveyor: Sexton Survey > Address: 128 W. 3rd . Telephone: _62 5-1711 > City: Rifle State: CO Zip Code: 81650 FAX: 625-3160_ > Name of Planner: > Address: Telephone: > City: State: _______ Zip Code: _______ FAX: GENERAL INFORMATION continued... D Location of Property: Section 3 5Township 6S Range88w • Practical Location / Address of Property: 8 5 7 5 c R 115 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 D Current Size of Property to be Subdivided (in acres): 48.520 D Number of Tracts / Lots Created within the Proposed Subdivision: 4 D Property Current Land Use Designation: 1. Property's Current Zone District: 2. Comprehensive Plan Map Designation: Proposed Utility Service: D Proposed Water Source: Well, Permit #2570297 D Proposed Method of Sewage Disposal: ISD S D Proposed Public Access VIA: CR D Easements: Utility: Kinder Moran, Holy Cross, 8west Ditch: Thad Neislanik Ditch D Total Development Area (fill in the appropriate boxes below): (7) :Residential Units 1 Lots • Size (Acres). rkrnq Provided iflgle Fam y 3 11.352 12+ Multi -Family; Mobile Horst€ 'ota 3 11.352 12+ Placer Areal'(sq. it: ; ze t crest Pa rkrnq P rrvrdei (2) Commercial (3); industrial (4) :Public Quasi Public (5) Open Space t +i ommon Area'< 37.168 Total 37.168 > Base Fee: Sketch Plan - $325.00; Prelim Plan - $675.00; Final Plat - $200 paid on > Plat Review Fee (see attached fee schedule) 2 • • I. THE SUBDIVISION PROCESS In order to subdivide land in Garfield County, an Applicant is required to complete the following land use processes in the following order: 1) Sketch Plan Review Process, 2) Preliminary Plan Review Process, and 3) Final Plat Review Process. This section will briefly describe the nature of each process and provide general direction including subdivision regulation citations to a potential applicant requesting subdivision approval in Garfield County. All of the Garfield County Zoning and Subdivision Regulations are located for purchase at the Planning Department and can also be found on the World Wide Web at the following address: http://www.garfield-county.com/building and planninq/index.htm A) The Sketch Plan Review (Section 3:00 of the Subdivision Regulations) 1. Purpose The purpose of the Sketch Plan process is to allow an individual an opportunity to propose a subdivision in a "sketch" format to the Planning Department and the Garfield County Planning Commission in order to obtain a cursory review for compliance with the County's land use review documents, regulations, and policies to identify any issues that would need to be addressed if the proposed subdivision were to be pursued. 2. Applicability Any individual proposing a subdivision in Garfield County is required to complete the Sketch Plan review process as the first step in Garfield County's Subdivision process. More specifically, Garfield County defines a subdivision (Section 2:20.48) as the division of a lot, tract or parcel of land into two (2) or more lots, tracts, parcels or separate interests, or the use of any parcel of land for condominiums, apartments or other multiple -dwelling units, as further defined by Colorado state law. 3. Application / Submittal Requirements In order to apply for a Sketch Plan Review an Applicant is responsible for reviewing Section 3:00 of the Subdivision Regulations and providing enough information to the Planning Department in the application to conduct a thorough review and provide the resulting comments to the Planning Commission for their review and comments. Specifically, Section 3:30, 3:32, and 3:40 of the Subdivision Regulations contain the specific information required to be submitted to the Planning Department in order to satisfy the application requirements in addition to the information requested on this application form. 4. Process / Public Meeting The Sketch Plan review process is considered a 1 -step process because the application is reviewed only by the Planning Commission at a public meeting. In order to appear before the Planning Commission, an applicant will have submitted all required application submittal requirements mentioned above to the Planning Department Staff. Once submitted, Staff will have 15 working days to review the application to determine if all the required submittal information has been submitted as required. If Staff determines that all the required information has been submitted, a letter will be sent to the applicant indicating the application has been deemed "technically complete." It is at this point Staff will also indicate when the application has been 3 • • scheduled to be reviewed before the Planning Commission and will request the applicant supply additional copies to provide the Commission for theft review. If Staff determines that all the required information has not been submitted, a letter will be sent to the applicant indicating the application does not comply with the submittal requirements and therefore has determined the application to be "technically incomplete." The letter will also outline the applications deficiencies so that the applicant knows what additional information needs to be submitted. At this point, the applicant has 6 months (180 days) to provide the necessary information to the Planning Department to remedy the application so that it may be deemed technically complete. If the application has not been deemed technically complete within this time, the application will be terminated. Once the application has been deemed technically complete and a date has been established as to when the Planning Commission will review the application, Staff will conduct a land use review of the application using the County's land use regulatory documents including the Zoning Resolution, Subdivision Regulations, and the Comprehensive Plan of 2000. In addition, Staff will also consider referral comments provided from a variety of state and local agencies who may also review the application. As a result, Staff will write a Memorandum on the proposed subdivision to the Planning Commission containing the results on the land use analysis. This Memorandum will also be furnished in advance to the applicant. At the date and time set for the public meeting before the Planning Commission, Staff will present the findings in the Memorandum and the applicant will be required to present the proposed subdivision and respond to comments and questions provided by the Planning Commission. The comments provided to the Applicant by the Planning Department and the Planning Commission as a result of the Sketch Plan Process will be kept on file in the Planning Department for 1 -year from the meeting date before the Planning Commission. If an Applicant does not submit a Preliminary Plan application to the Planning Department within the 1 -year timeframe, the Sketch Plan file will be closed and the Applicant will need to reapply for a Sketch Plan review prior to a Preliminary Plan review. B) Preliminary Plan Review (Section 4:00 of the Subdivision Regulations) 1. Purpose The purpose of the Preliminary Plan review process is to conduct a thorough review of the many aspects that are associated with dividing land in Garfield County for the purposes of residential, commercial, and industrial development. This is the most intensive review step where the Building and Planning Staff, the Planning Commission, and the Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) will conduct a thorough review of all the issues associated with the proposed subdivision against the County's regulatory requirements. Ultimately, the purpose of this process is to identify all the major issues in the proposed subdivision by using the County's Zoning Resolution, Subdivision Regulations, Comprehensive Plan of 2000, as well as other state and local referral agencies that will provide comments on any issues raised in their review. This is the process that will either approve or deny the application request. 4 • • 2. Applicability Any individual proposing a subdivision in Garfield County is required to complete the Preliminary Plan review process as the second and most intensive step in Garfield County's Subdivision process. More specifically, Garfield County defines a subdivision as the division of a lot, tract or parcel of land into two (2) or more lots, tracts, parcels or separate interests, or the use of any parcel of land for condominiums, apartments or other multiple -dwelling units, as further defined by Colorado state law. 3. Application / Submittal Requirements In order to apply for a Preliminary Plan Review, an Applicant must have already completed the Sketch Plan review process addressed in Section 3:00 of the Subdivision Regulations. An applicant requesting Preliminary Plan review will be required to submit this application form, all the required submittal information contained in Sections 4:40 to 4:94 of the Subdivision Regulations as well as address all of the applicable Design and Improvement Standards in Section 9:00 of the Subdivision Regulations. In addition to the substantive submittal information related to the proposed subdivision project itself, an applicant is required to complete all the public notice requirements so that legal public hearings can be held before the Planning Commission and the BOCC which is addressed in Sections 4:20 — 4:31 of the Subdivision Regulations. 4. Process / Public Hearings The Preliminary Plan review process is considered a 2 -step process because the application is ultimately reviewed by two County decision-making entities during public hearings: the Planning Commission who makes a recommendation to the BOCC. In order to obtain dates for the public hearings before the Planning Commission and the BOCC, an applicant will have submitted all required application submittal requirements mentioned above to the Planning Department Staff. Once submitted, Staff will have 30 working days to review the application to determine if all the required submittal information has been submitted as required. If Staff determines that all the required information has been submitted, a letter will be sent to the applicant indicating the application has been deemed "technically complete." It is at this point Staff will also indicate when the application has been scheduled to be reviewed before the Planning Commission / BOCC. Additionally, Staff will provide the applicant with the notice forms to be mailed, published, and posted. If Staff determines that all the required information has not been submitted, a letter will be sent to the applicant indicating the application does not comply with the submittal requirements and therefore has determined the application to be "technically incomplete." The letter will also outline the applications deficiencies so that the 5 • • applicant knows what additional information needs to be submitted. At this point, the applicant has 6 months (180 days) to provide the necessary information to the Planning Department to remedy the application so that it may be deemed technically complete. If the application has not been deemed technically complete within this time, the application will be terminated. Once the application has been deemed technically complete and a date has been established as to when the Planning Commission / BOCC will review the application, Staff will conduct a land use review of the application using the County's land use regulatory documents including the Zoning Resolution, Subdivision Regulations, and the Comprehensive Plan of 2000. In addition, Staff will also consider referral comments provided from a variety of state and local agencies who may also review the application. As a result, Staff will write a Memorandum on the proposed subdivision to the Planning Commission / BOCC containing the results on the land use analysis. This Memorandum will also be furnished in advance to the applicant prior to the public hearings. As mentioned above, Staff makes a recommendation to the Planning Commission and the BOCC regarding the issues raised in the analysis of the proposed subdivision. The Applicant will first propose the subdivision to the Planning Commission who is responsible for making a recommendation of approval, approval with conditions, or denial to the BOCC. Next, the application will be reviewed by the BOCC during a regular public hearing. The BOCC will consider the recommendations from the Planning Staff and the Planning Commission, the information presented by the applicant, and the public. As a result, the BOCC is the final decision-making entity regarding the proposed subdivision and will either approve, approve with conditions, or deny the application. If the BOCC approves the subdivision application at the public hearing, the approval shall be valid for a period not to exceed one (1) year from the date of Board approval, or conditional approval, unless an extension of not more than one (1) year is granted by the Board prior to the expiration of the period of approval. (See the specific information provided in Section 4:34 of the Subdivision Regulations.) Following the hearing, Staff will provide a resolution signed by the BOCC which memorializes the action taken by the Board with any / all conditions which will be recorded in the Clerk and Recorder's Office. Once an applicant has Preliminary Plan approval, they are required to complete the third and final step in the County's Subdivision Process: Final Plat Review. C) Final Plat Review (Section 5:00 of the Subdivision Regulations) 1. Purpose The purpose of the Final Plat review process is to provide the applicant with a mechanism to prove to the County that all the conditions of approval required during the Preliminary Plan review process have been met / addressed to the satisfaction of the Planning Staff and the BOCC. This being the case, the chairman of the BOCC will 6 • • sign the Final Plat and have it recorded memorializing the subdivision approval granted by the BOCC. This is the last step in the County's subdivision process. 2. Applicability Any individual proposing a subdivision in Garfield County is required to complete the Final Plat review process as the third and last step in Garfield County's Subdivision process. More specifically, Garfield County defines a subdivision as the division of a lot, tract or parcel of land into two (2) or more lots, tracts, parcels or separate interests, or the use of any parcel of land for condominiums, apartments or other multiple -dwelling units, as further defined by Colorado state law. 3. Application / Submittal Requirements In order to apply for a Final Plat review, an Applicant must have already completed the Preliminary Plan review process addressed in Section 4:00 of the Subdivision Regulations. An applicant requesting Final Plat review will be required to submit this application form, all the required submittal information contained in Section 5:00 of the Subdivision Regulations and responses to all the conditions of approval required as part of the Preliminary Plan review process. 4. Process The Final Plat review process is considered a 1 -step process because the application is ultimately reviewed by the Building and Planning Staff and presented to the BOCC for their signature if the application satisfies all the required submittal information to the satisfaction of the Building and Planning Department. If Staff determines that all the required information has been submitted, a letter will be sent to the applicant indicating the application has been deemed "technically complete." It is at this point Staff will also indicate when the application has been scheduled to be presented to the BOCC for signature. (This is not a public hearing or meeting and therefore does not require public notice.) If Staff determines that all the required information has not been submitted, a letter will be sent to the applicant indicating the application does not comply with the submittal requirements and therefore has determined the application to be "technically incomplete." The letter will also outline the applications deficiencies so that the applicant knows what additional information needs to be submitted. Once the application has been deemed technically complete and a date has been established as to when the BOCC will review the Final Plat, Staff will review the application / Final Plat in terms of adequacy to determine if all the submittal information satisfies the Final plat requirements as well as the responses to the conditions of approval. During this review, Staff will forward the Final Plat the County Surveyor for review and a signature. In the event there are additional questions or clarification issues to be addressed, the County Surveyor will generally contact the applicant to have the plat adjusted as necessary. Once, Staff has completed the review and all required information has been submitted to the satisfaction of the Planning Department 7 • • and the County Surveyor has signed the Final Plat in Mylar form, it will be scheduled at the next BOCC meeting to be placed on the consent agenda with a request to authorize the Chairman of the BOCC to sign the plat. Once the Final Plat is signed, it is then recorded by the County Clerk in the Clerk and Recorder's Office for a fee of $11 for the first sheet and $10 for each additional sheet thereafter. This fee shall be paid by the applicant. This act of recording the signed Final Plat represents the completion of the Garfield County Subdivision Process. Please refer to the specific language in the Final Plat portion (Section 5:00) of the Subdivision Regulations for specific timelines and additional responsibilities required of the applicant to complete the Final Plat process. Please Note: This information presented above is to be used as a general guide fur an applicant considering a subdivision in Garfield County. It is highly recommended that an applicant either purchase the Garfield County Zoning Resolution and Subdivision Regulations or access them on-line at: http://www.garfield-countv.com/buildinq and planninq/index.htm in order to ascertain all the necessary requirements for each of the three steps including Sketch Plan Review, Preliminary Plan Review, and Final Plat Review. I have read the statements above and have provided the required attached information which is correct and accurate to the best of my knowledge. (Sig a re of applicant/owner) Last Revised: 11/21/2002 8 1/27/05 F • Date • • WAYNE RUDD 132 Park Ave. Basalt, CO 81621 970-927-9119 Fax 927-4027 May 7, 2004 Mark Bean Garfield County Planning Department 108 8th St. Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 RE: Overview Subdivision Dear Mark: Please be advised that I, as property owner, authorize Steve Oger, Rick Oger, and Gary Setnes to act as my representatives and co -applicants, regarding the subdivision application and related approval activities of Overview Subdivision. Thank you for your assistance. Sincerely, f1' WaynRudd Owner, 29 Peaks, Parcel B • • Overview Subdivision, Garfield County, CO The parcel to be subdivided is owned by Wayne Rudd. The three co -applicants Steve Oger, Rick Oger and Gary Setness are long time employees of Rudd Construction. Upon Final Plat approval Wayne Rudd has agreed to sell the three lots at a greatly reduced price, so that these employees will have the ability to build their own homes. All three of the employees are renters, and have never owned homes in the Roaring Fork Valley. In all likelihood, this opportunity would be their only possibility of owning their own homes. It is anticipated that only one single family home and barn/accessory structure would be built on each lot. This Subdivision will be served by the following utilities: Kinder Morgan Gas - Holy Cross Electric - Qwest Telephone - All of these utilities are currently available on the proposed Lot 3. It is not known if cable TV is available at this time. Utility easements to each lot will be provided on the final plat. The proposed lots will be served by one common drive, and a drive easement will be provided on the final plat. A driveway permit off of County Road 115 is in place. The proposed lots will be served by the existing well, and a well sharing agreement will be in place at the time of final plat. Sewage disposal will be accomplished with Individual Septic Disposal Systems. There are no known radiation hazards on the site. There are no rivers or streams on the site, thus the proposed development will have no impact on public waters. Development will occur primarily on the Southernmost part of the parcel, which is less steep than the topography to the North. Care will be taken to prevent erosion of any excavated areas. It is proposed that the 3 lot owners will have an undivided 1/3 interest in the common/agricultural lot. From Land Title (M4) Mon Jan 31 10:38:09 L005 Nage 1 or 1u • • PIPI‘ Land Title 41.1ARANTrr CC1M1'ANY Date: 01-31-2005 Property Address: Land Title Guarantee Company CUSTOMER D1ST RLBUT 1ON Our Order Number: GW245591 If you have any inquiries or require further assistance, please contact one of the numbers below: For Title Assistance: Glenwood Springs "GW" Unit 1317 GRAND AVE #200 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 Phone: 970-945-2610 Fax: 970-945-4784 RUDD CONSTRUCTION, INC. 0132 PARK AVE BASALT CO 81621 Attn: ROLAND PARKER Phone: 970-927-9119 Tax: 970-927-4027 Copies: 1 Sent Via US Postal Service ..:rom Land Title (M4) IP" Land Title l i'l. JANANrFF C.()htl'ANY Property Address: Buyer/Borrower: TBD Seller/Owner: honer: WAYNE RUDD Mon Jan 31 1U:38:U9 L005 Page 1 of 10 • • Land Title Guarantee Company Date: 01-31-2095 Our Order Number: GW245591 Need a map or directions for your upcoming closing? Check oul Land Title's web site al www.ltge.com for directions to any of our 54 office locations. ESTIMATE OF TITLE FEES Alta (boners Policy 10-17-92 TBD If Land Title Guarantee Company will be closing this transaction, above fees will be collected at that time. TOTAL $0. 00 Fore CONTACT 06/04 THANK YOU FOR YOUR ORDER! rrom Land title (M4) Mon Jan .il 1U:3b:0T LUUS Nage i of lU • • Property Address: Old Republic National Tide Jnsurancc Company ALTA COMMITMENT Our Order No. GW245591 Schedule A Cast. Ref.: 1. Effective Date: January 07, 2005 at 5:(M) P.M. 2. Policy to be Issued, and Proposed Insured: "ALTA" Owner's Policy 10-17-92 Proposed Insured: TBD 3. The estate or interest in the land described.nr,_reterred_tc►_in-thic.Commitment .and_covered_he.rein.is:_. A Fee Simple 4. '1'illc 10 the ealnlc or inieresl covered herein is al the effective dale hereof vested in! WAYNE RUDD 5. The land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows: SEE ATTACHED PAGE(S) FOR LEGAL DESCRIPTION ;rom Lana Title (M4) MOn Jan 51 lU:Jo:U`) LUn -'age 4 of 1U • • Our Order No: GW245591 LEG81 1PT1GM A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN THE SE1/4 OF SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 88 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., PART LYING NORTHERLY OF THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF COUNTY ROAD NO. 115 MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; BEGINNING A'1' A POINT WHENCE THE CENTER Ole SAID SECTION 35 REARS N 00 DEGREES 3W 55" E 220.00 FEET; THH.NCE 58 DEGREES 26' 31" E 2784.31 FEET; THENCE S 02 DEGREES 58' 44' W 529.37 FEET TO A POINT ()N THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF COUNTY ROAD 115; THENCE ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY THE FOLLOWING 15 COURSES ANI) DISTAN CES: 1) S 74 DEGREES 18' 28" W 72.19 FI+J:'1'; 2) S 69 DEGREES 38' 57" W 158. 23 MEI; 3) S 66 DEGREES 29' 42" W 407.88 FEET; 4) S 79 DEGREES 45' 30" W 133.09 FEET; 5) N 72 DEGREES 44' 14" W 325.29 FEET; 6) N 66 DEGREES 47' 27" W 414.18 FEET; 7) N 79 DEGREES 05' 57" W 179.80 FEET; 8) S 87 DEGREES 50'04" W 181.38 FEET; 9) N 82 DEGREES 56' 53" W 105.37 FEET; 10) N 67 DEGREES 55' 39" W 256.18 FEET; 11) N 76 DEGREES 17' 14" W 86.49 FEET; 12) N 79 DEGREES 21' 59" W 162.24 FEET; 13) S 68 DEGREES 49' 29" W 89.74 FEET; 14) S 56 DEGREES 36' 02" W 192.23 FEET; 15) S 77 DEGREES 23' 36" W 138.02 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID RIGHT OF WAY N 00 DEGREES 38' 55" E 1145.75 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING COUNTY OF GARFIELD STATE OF COLORADO From Land Title (M4) • Mon Jan J1 1U: .16:09 LOU • Nage or 10 ALTA COMMITMENT Schedule B-1 (Requirements) The following arc the requirements to be complied with: Our Order No. (;W245591 Payment to or for the account of he grantors or mortgagors of the full consideration for the estate or interest to be Proper instrument(s) creating the estate or interest to be insured must be executed and duly filed for record, to -wit: THIS COMMITMENT IS FOR INFORMATION ONLY, ANI) NO POLICY WILL BE ISSUED PURSUANT HERETO. rom Lana T it l e (IVR) ivion Jan 31 1u:36:1Jy euuD rage o 01 10 • • ALTA. COMMITMENT Schedule B-2 (Exceptions) Our Order No. GW245591 The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company: 1. Rights or claims of partes in possession not shown by the public records. 2. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public records. 3. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, and any facts which a correct survey and inspection of the premises would disclose and which are not shown by the public records. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material themtntnre or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 5. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claim; or other matters, if any, created, fust appearing in the public records or attaching suhsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. 6. Taxes and assessments not yet due or payable and special assessments not yet certified to the Treasurer's office. 7. Any unpaid taxes or assessments against said land. 8. Liens for unpaid water and sewer charges, if any. 9. RIGHT OF WAY FOR DITCHES OR CANALS CONSTRUCTED BY THE AUTHORTl'Y OF THE UNITED STATES AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 11, 1939, IN BOOK 194 AT PAGE 593 AND RECORDED MAY 16, 1941 IN BOOK 194 AT PAGE 636. 10. EXCEPTING AND RESERVING, HOWEVER, TO THE UNITED STATES ALL THE COAL AND OTHER MINERALS IN THE LANDS SO ENTERED AND PATENTED, TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT TO PROSPECT FOR, MINE, ANI) REMOVE THE SAME PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS AND LIMITATIONS OF THE AC 1' OF DECEMBER 29, 1916 (39 STAT., 862), AS CONTAINED IN PATENTS RECORDED SEPTEMBER 11, 1939 IN BOOK 194 AT PAGE 593 AND RECORDED MAY 16, 1941 IN BOOK 194 AT PAGE 636. 11. EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY AS GRANTED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED JUNE 12, 1962 IN ROOK 342 AT PAGE 384. 12. AN UNDIVIDED ONE-HALF INTEREST IN AND TO ALL OIL, GAS AND OTHER MINERALS IN, ON OR UNDER THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AS RESERVED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED MARCH 15, 1961 IN BOOK 333 AT PAGE 46, AM) ANY AND ALL ASSIGNMENTS THEREOF OR INTERESTS THEREIN. From Land Title (M4) • Mon Jan Sl 1U:Sts:U9 LUUS • rage / or lu ALTA COMMITMENT Schedule B-2 (Exceptions) Our Order No. GW245591 I'hc policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same arc disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company: 13. EASEMENTS, RIGHTS OF WAY, TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS AND OBLIGATIONS OF CONTRACT RECORDED FEBRUARY 3, 1985 IN BOOK 930 AT PAGE 778 AND AMENDED APRIL 8, 1996 IN BOOK 973 AT PAGE 174. 14. RIGHTS OF WAY AND EASEMENTS AS SHOWN ON MAPS RECORDED AS RECEPTION NO. 485861 AND 489756. 15. TERMS, CONDLTIONS AND PROVISIONS OF RESOLUTIONS RECORDED APRIL 11, 1995 IN BOOK 937 AT PAGE 123 AND IN BOOK 1056 AT PAGE 948 RECORDED MARCH 10, 1998. 16, EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY FOR DITCHES AS SHOWN ON IMPROVEMENT SURVEY DATED MAY 23, 1999 PREPARED BY SEXTON SURVEY AS JOB NO. 99061NTH. 17. EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY FOR UTILITY CONNECTIONS AS SHOWN ON IMPROVEMENT SURVEY DATED MAY 23, 1999 PREPARED BY SEXTON SURVEY AS JOB. NO. 99061NTH. 18. POSSESSORY RIGHTS OUTSIDE OF FENCELINE AS SHOWN ON IMPROVEMENT SURVEY DATED MAY 23, 1999 PREPARED BY SEXTON SURVEY AS JOB NO. 99061NTH. 19. ENCROACHMENT OF FENCELINE ONTO ADJOINING PROPERTY. 20. TERIVLS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF EASEMENT RECORDED SEPTIISIBER 26, 2003 IN BOOK 1523 AT PAGE 194. t torn Land I l t l e (M4) mon Jan Sl 1u:i :Uy Luurage or lu • • LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY DISCLOSURE STATEMENTS Note: Pursuant to CRS 10-11-122, notice is hereby given that: A) The subject real property may be located in a special taxing district. B) A Certificate of Taxes Due listing each taxing jurisdiction may he obtained from the County Treasurer's authorized agent C) The information regarding special districts and the boundaries of such districts may be obtained from the Board of County Conunissioners, the County Clerk and Recorder, or the County Assessor. Note: Effective September 1, 1997, CRS 30-10-406'egwres llrat an- enTeur►ent.s neceivrxf-forreconting-or-filinrg in the clerk aril recorder's office shall contain a top margin of at least one inch and a left, right and bottom margin of at least one half of an inch. The clerk and recorder may refuse to record or file any documient that does not conform, except that, the requirement for the top margin shall not apply to documents using forms on which space is provided for recording or filing information at the lop margin of the document. Note: Colorado Division of Insurance Regulations 3-5-1, Paragraph C of Article VII requires that 'Every title entity shall be responsible for all matters which appear of record prior to the time of recording whenever the title entity conducts the closing and is responsible for recording or filing of legal documents resulting from the transaction which was closed". Provided that Land Title Guarantee Company conducts the closing of the insured transaction and is responsible for recording the legal documents from the transaction, exception lnunber 5 will not appear on the Owner's Title Policy and the Lenders Policy when issued. Note: Affirmative mechanic's lien protection for the Owner may be available (typically by deletion of Exception no. 4 of Schedule B, Section 2 of the Commihment from the Owner's Policy to be issued) upon compliance with the following conditions: A) The land described in Schedule A of this commitment mast be a single family residence which includes a condominium or townhouse unit. B) No labor or materials have been furnished by mechanics or material -men for purposes of construction on the land described in Schedule A of this Commitment within the past 6 months. C) The Company must receive an appropriate affidavit indemnifying the Company against un -filed mechanic's and material -men's liens. D) The Company must receive payment of the appropriate pnenriunl. E) Tf there has been construction, improvements or major repairs undertaken on the property to be purchased within six months prior to the Date of the Commitment, the requirements to obtain coverage for unrecorded liens will include: disclosure of certain construction information; financial information as to the seller, the builder and or the contractor, payment of the appropriate premien fully executed Indemnity Agreements satisfactory to the company, and, any additional mgaurements as may be necessary after an examination of the aforesaid information by the Company. No coverage will be given under any circumstances for labor or material for which the insured has contracted for or agreed to pay. Note: Pursuant to CRS 10-11-123, notice is hereby given: This notice applies to owner's policy commitments containing a mineral severance instrument exception, or exceptions, in Schedule B, Section 2. A) That there is recorded evidence that a mineral estate has been severed, leased, or otherwise conveyed from the surface estate and that there is a suhstantial likelihood that a third party holds some or all interest in oil, gas, other minerals, or geothermal energy in the property; and B) That such mineral estate may include the right to enter and use the property without the surface owner's permission. Nothing herein contained will be deemed to obligate the company to provide any of the coverages referred to herein unless the above condition are fully satisfied. Form DISCLOSURE 09/01/02 From Land Title (M4) Mon Jan iL 1U:323:U9 LW/5 rage i or iu • • JOINT NOTICE OF PRIVACY POLICY OF LANs) TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY AND LAND TITLE INSURANCE CORPORATION AND OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Title V of the Granum -Leach -Bliley Act (GLBA) generally prohibits any financial institution, directly or through its affiliates, from sharing nonpublic personal information about you with a nonaffiliated dual party unless the institution provides you with a notice of its privacy policies and practices, such as the type of information that it collects about you and the categories of persons or entities to whom it may be disclosed. In compliance with the GLBA, we are providing you with this document, which notifies you of (he privacy policies and practices of Land 'title Guarantee Company and Land Title Insurance Corporation and (Md Republic National Title Insurance Company. We may collect nonpublic personal infi►rmation about you from the following sources: Information we receive from you such as on applications or other forms. Information about your transactions we secure from our files, or from our affiliates or others. Information we receive from a consumer reporting agency. Information that we receive from others involved in your transaction, such as the real estate agent or lender. Unless it is specifically slated otherwise in an amended Privacy Policy Notice, no additional nonpublic personal information will be collected about you. We may Ulsciuse any of inc uuove information mall we -collect about aur customers ur former customers to our affiliates or to nonaffiliated third parties as permitted by law. We also may disclose this information about our customers or former customers to the following types of nonaffiliated companies that perform marketing services on our behalf or with whom we have joint marketing agreements: * Financial service providers such as companies engaged in banking, consumer finance, securities and insurance. * Non-financial companies such as envelope staffers and other fulfillment service providers. WE DO NOT DISCLOSE ANY NONPUBLIC PERSONAL INFORMATION ABOUT YOU WITH ANYONE FOR ANY PURPOSE THAT IS NOT SPECIFICALLY PERMITTED BY LAW. We restrict access to nonpublic personal information about you to those employees who need to know that information in order to provide products or services to you. We maintain physical, electronic, and procedural safeguards that comply with federal regulations to guard your nonpublic personal information. Form PRIV.POL.ORT from Land Title (M4) Mon Jan 31 10:38:09 2005 Nage to or lu • • axmitr Blt to I nstre PJJA Qmritrre t -1970 Fey. CLDFEREL1C1\1411CN4LITTLEINallANCEOXPAlY, afAr a taoapoaticn 1luancalled the Camay, faa wiuldeccsdardiai herebycarnitstoisaeits pdicY cr paid sd tille irsuance asiced ifiedinSSchedieA infare dthe p JIraredrened'n9:tecileA mcwnirer ma-tgajae dthe estate Qiie s! caerer haret/i the lad described ardered-1oinSdeciieA urn payment dthe peniumandd-a ttBefa-all stied tothepraiecrsd Schac ie A and B and to the ant las ard Stigtat ions tared. ThisQrnr:trrelsillIce effect :vecit. when the irdaiitydthe p p 1Iran:dadtheatnrld1tepolicya priciescarnittedfcrFeneteen irsafedinSt ±ieAhuedlcytheCn ary,altgdlhetinedtheisaac d11is ` * analtrrrrt a b/s secpart endasarrall. ThsQrrr it nutispdiniraylotle:saacedsrhpdicyapoliciesdtitleirarateadalliatiityaTldligtias herardar dal cease and terrirdesxrrttttsaterthe effedivedate huedawh3rlhepkyapoliaesminittedfa- dellIBP.,w.ticl- firs cccus pro,,idad Met thefairieto:ssieschpolicy apk ism* the faft d1hean-ra-y. a u1aSPFFDSilR A110S 1.1Tetam"nurigac ', when Lead ht l dell indi.thdam! d trtd, test best aether wurity irdruial. 2 if the prgsesed bared trio' =firmaatut ialavlecitg d an/ &fe d, lien cncurbrarce, ad er ctaima dha mutter dfedirgtheesldeairtaffiarrrct ti>eemoouaedbid-tsQnnfirratother tFarthcaeshown in9± ileBhied,arlstdlfaltocisdcseachInzwlecia cf6nrsj: : ...l ow .-oa ,: ��,r�. t'y' bra d tI pry, Y'11,iaas-sJioso d�Jaue .- t ru"w-vier- �r. If ft. pyo ilrc.unci �c-..-L_�-s-ich totlr Qartery cr if tlrC rp>y cries .scc}iicc, actual irowlectfidaysd1dated,ian,ettntraeearbasedaimadianater,theCnpa3/atitsgiicnnayaradScfedleBdiisQirrritneriamtirrgy,bti such a i dent ref relieve r1eCit aFs. yfrmeprevra.eiyinaxtedpusai toi3d tFuse arritiasad9ipia ic s 3. LiaFilitydthe curpriytri 1Its CamilmalId! beaiytottarand plgsaedhand adsrhpities irdmixt aria thed.#iriticndIraredinthefamdpolicycrpdidesocnritledfQiiiatyfaa1 l loss inarred in rekace harem Lrdataiinging. iifath(a)to caddywith the recd raratshereof x(b)fodint nate ccept aunt inaleB,a(c)toast}ireaaeaeiheestate aheed anvtc hereatceraedtythis Qnnitrreri_Int-nazi dellsrhItatilityelpreedthewartstaledinSdacJeAfathepdcyapdidesearnfttedfcra Js.dnIiiadityissi*tto1Fe:curing periec sad the Cbrdt:asard Stip./ethasardtla B clusia sfranC aera:y d 11efamd policy a pdiidescarlritted fa infava- d the prc>p:ced Irased which ae [tardy ioaposeed by referer i andna ea pat d thisOimitrrert carp meg:ready nudfied luart 4 Pry acthoncr aliases ri tsd act ion that the prepossd Insured rat/ laecr nay hung acpirst the hnlrlry arising at d 1hestalls cf thet rlletote estate a irte real crthe eat r sol the rruigatherecn weed b/thisQ3mitrrai met be fwd m arcus at toile pt Y sd thisQmritnet. Sr D(037110 \S InacYit:artot hemeets catared inthe QrtitiasadRigid iasardfxitscrsfran GaRra: aca.e referred Id thisaimitmant isasosl ad tottefdicarrg 1. F3 jtsa dairrs ct parties in peri rtt d -own ty the public muck 2. Easentrts a dainsd emaivts; rid svnn bite p.tlic ream 3. 6s repay eies, ca iidsit bitchy hiss dulacy in arm, ea uoacmeths, and ayfalse/rich a aiiei sney a d:Media: d the paiissWxfd dscicse arcawhich are rtt arm byte p.tiic reoatt 4 Prulista-ridttoabe fcrsa io:s, la:cr cr material 1 haretdcre Fucefierfund—ldin db/law a1dnot shown b/thep hermits CCCRf 5. Qdexts ties, emntrarxs, ariesedairsadherratters if ay, crated first apaairgintim pir-reloads aattach rig elseg_ettot heeffedivedale hued tat pricrlot FecaetFep isratedacq.iresdreoadfa-valtelheestateairterest a nut gactluea1covered ty I histrrrritneri. INWTNt W-ffBF,CtdF PtilicPJlialalTitleIrararreO 1 VIffieritsa peraleraiead33el10 het>rrartoaff bed by, its rttyathvizeddicers arlFedie stvinin SchulteAtobe valid when cartesgeJb/av tug off icer adharacttuiaadeget ay. 0 4ttnizedSgatue QD Fel-a1ChlAT1G LTiTLEIf t7TtPPF Y ASIodCQnTay ,.o pt.*iriF 40oSeoottifiieneSath = v * * Sp - * Mircz},Jfs Mrresda55701 t j 'F * ( n (612)371-1111 Q'70 I,Nd . • • Dec. 2, 2004 Gary Setnes Carbondale, CO 81623 Dear Mr. Setnes, With regards to your subdivision located at 8575 County Road 115, I would make the following recommendations concerning fire protection: The code requires that the address be posted during the construction phase, as well as after completion. I would recommend that since the access road coming off of County Road 115 will be used as a common driveway for all the homes being built, that you make a single posting of the address at the entrance with all addresses listed. The roadways must be serviceable and maintained prior to and during construction. The code requires access roads have a width of 20 feet of drive able surface, with a vertical clearance of 13'6". Ideally, two points of access should be provided to the buildings, to provide public emergency egress from an area. Sometimes the second point of access is marked as an "Emergency Access Only", and is only used during an emergency. If this can be accomplished, then the installation of a turnaround wouldn't be necessary. As with all roadways, the emergency access road needs to be maintained year round. The road grades should be no greater than 10%. The maximum backing distance for a fire apparatus is 150 feet. If a roadway or driveway dead ends and is greater than 150 feet, an approved turnaround shall be provided. I have enclosed specifications for both a cul-de-sac and a tee turnaround. All driveways need to have a minimum unobstructed width of 12 feet and a minimum unobstructed height of 13'6". It is my understanding that a 7000 gallon water tank will be installed to be used for fire fighting purposes. The tank as well as the piping shall be backfilled appropriately so that freezing does not occur. All suction, fill and vent piping shall be PVC with glued joints. Any exposed PVC pipe needs to be painted to protect it from ultraviolet light. An access opening needs to be provided for inspection and maintenance of the tank. The dry hydrant to which the fire department will connect needs to be 6" pipe with a 6" threaded male suction connection. The threads are to be national standard (NST) and the male adaptor shall have a cap. The dry hydrant shall be 24" in height above finish grade. Dry hydrants shall be accessible under all weather conditions and shall be located so as not to block the roadway. The maximum lift from the bottom of suction piping to fire apparatus pump connection shall be a maximum 15' vertical distance. The fill pipe shall be a minimum of 2 1/2" NST female thread with cap and the fill connection located 36" above finish grade. All exposed piping needs to be protected from vehicular damage I have enclosed diagrams showing different acceptable installations of water tanks. • • It looked like the vegetation in the subdivision was primarily grasses and oak brush, with a few pinyon juniper. I would recommend removing all trees/brush from the area within 15 feet from the edges of the structure. If a tree or brush cluster must remain, it will be considered a part of the structure and the measurement will include that cluster. The grass needs to be trimmed in that area also. Special attention should be paid to the vegetation on the downhill side of the structures, as well as drainages, as fire will move up hill through vegetation in these areas quickly. A vegetation management plan of reducing the amount of fuel available so as to reduce the probability of a rapidly spreading wildfire needs to be addressed. This would include removing dead fuels such as slash and snags, trimming of ground fuels, ladder fuels and the thinning and pruning of live trees/brush. The density of the vegetation may increase as it goes away from the structure. Approved noncombustible roofing material should be used. For roof coverings where the profile allows a space between the roof covering and the roof decking, the space at the eave ends shall be stopped to preclude entry of flames or embers. If I can be of further assistance please feel free to contact me. rIcio Vonda Williams Uniform Fire Code Inspector Fire Inspector II Residential Building inspector Wildfire Consultant Dec. 2, 2004 Address Requirements Access • • • All new construction projects will have the address posted in a visible area during the construction phase. • The Uniform Fire Code requires that all new and existing buildings be provided with numbers or addresses. Address numbers on buildings are required to be plainly visible from the street or road fronting the property. The numbers shall contrast with their background. • Where multiple addresses are required at a single driveway, they shall be mounted on a single post, and additional signs shall be posted at locations where driveways divide. • Prior to and during construction, access roadways must be made serviceable and maintained for fire protection and emergency purposes. • Two points of access should be provided to the buildings. This is a safety consideration which helps the Fire Department avoid being blocked from reaching an emergency. It also provides the public emergency egress from an area. The secondary roadway could be an "Emergency Access Only" and it would need to be maintained year round, such as cleared of snow in winter, and the vegetation trimmed. • No road grades should be greater than 10% and grade at an intersection no greater than 4%. • Maximum backup distance for a fire apparatus is 150 feet; if greater than 150 feet a suitable turnaround shall be provided (such as a Tee turnaround or a cul-de-sac). All cul-de-sac's are to have a minimum diameter of 90 feet clear space with no parking. • Fire Department access roads are to have no less than 20 feet in width of drive able surface. Required vertical clearance for Fire Department access roads is 13'6". The roadway shall be maintained and unobstructed in all types of weather. • • • Dead end roadways in excess of 150 feet shall be provided with an approved turnaround. • Driveways shall be provided when any portion of an exterior wall of the first story of a building is located more than 150 feet from an access road. Driveways shall provide a minimum unobstructed width of 12 feet and a minimum unobstructed height of 13'6". Driveways in excess of 200 feet in length and less than 20 feet in width shall be provided with turnouts in addition to turnarounds. Driveway turnouts shall be all weather road surface at least 10 feet wide and 30 feet long. Water Supply ♦ Required water supply for one and two family dwellings that has a fire area which does not exceed 3,600 square feet shall be 1,000 gallons per minute for a minimum duration of 30 minutes. • Dry hydrants shall be located to be accessible under all weather conditions. Locations shall allow connection of fire apparatus without blocking roadway. ♦ Dry hydrants shall have a minimum clearance of 20 feet on each side and be located a minimum of 100 feet from any structure. Grass, brush and other vegetation shall be kept trimmed. Vegetation shall be cleared for a minimum 3 foot radius from around hydrants. • Clearance of fuel around water supply pumps and pump houses shall be provided. ♦ Tanks/cisterns and piping shall be backfilled to appropriate depth and/or insulated to prevent freezing. ♦ Access opening shall be provided for inspection and maintenance of tank/cistern. Mitigation • All trees/brush 15 feet from the edges of the structure should be removed to reduce the fire hazard. If a tree or cluster of trees/brush must remain, it will be considered as an integral part of the structure and the measurement will be from that point (Zone 1). All trees within Zone 1 must be pruned to at least 10 feet above the ground, but no more than 1/3 the overall height of the tree (Aspen trees, individual spruce, fir and pine specimens are exempt). All ladder fuels must be removed from beneath the tree or tree cluster. ♦ Roofs shall consist of an approved noncombustible roof covering. For roof coverings where the profile allows a space between the roof covering and roof decking, the space at the eave ends shall be stopped to preclude entry of flames or embers. • • Aerial 33' R 19' m 6'- 18.0' Fa -D3" TURNING RADIUS SPECIFICATIONS TURNING RADIUS REQUIRED FOR FIRE TRUCKS IN A TEE TURNAROUND 30.0' \NN \\ \\ Aerial / ` r TURNING RADIUS RIEQUIRED�-- FOR FRE TRUCKS IN A CIRCLE / / / ✓ / Pumper TURNAROUND / / l / /' (( 1 f / 1� `� e \\ R= Q / *—SNS DE EEL. P4'1►lii ER ' R=28'--OuTSIIDE WHEEL PUMPER R=33'—INSIDE WHEEL AERIAL R=45'—OUTSIDE WHEEL AERIAL R=48'--OIITy'SIDE OVERHANG AERIAL 16 m \\ "48 FIRIE PROTECTION SYSTEM #1 APPLIED ENGINEERING & SUPPLY GOLDEN, COLORADO. 303.215 •0287 . d ",t' ♦ t¢pM l�k': �, SbS3$ aR ta,(atk Hir I.:1CmSaYwmV.W STANDARD DRY HYDRANT - DRAFT Components Optional rnanway with polyethylene extension to grade Bolted steel cover with gasket 4" lockable level inspection port Combination PVC vent / refill, 2.5" NST -F swivel & plug Dry hydrant head with dust cap, 6" NST -Male 8" pipe coupling molded into tank shell for draw pipe 6" draw pipe with vortex breaker at foot Weep tube to maintain proper air space 4" cam & groove fitting with lockable cap Notes 1 Refill through, combination vent .or dry hydrant with 2.5" hose adapter (50 PSI max) 2 Lift for 8 ft. diameter tank = 13 vertical feet to hydrant head 3 Manway access is not required / optional accessory 4 Order check valve in weep tube "I-1" for potable water applications 5 Mix or combine accessories to meet your specific department requirements 6 Use filter fabric geotextile between gravel and soil cover 7 Installation must follow A.E.& S. "Installation Handbook" Vent with guard & insect screen. Brass 2.5" NST -F refill swivel & plug 36" min, Berm Berm -E— Alternate 45° design Soil cover fabrics • !r gravels tea' "Y 041 1 1 0 Road surface ��11i�11��11�f�g • 1" •1 �' 6ces! 0,04 ft 1 I' 0 Descriptive of fire department applications Revised 10,97 FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM #3 APPLIED ENGINEERING & SUPPLY GOLDEN, COLORADO 303.215.0267 GRAVITY DISCHARGE TO CITY STYLE HYDRANT Notes • 14;;4. brie over 1 Manway access enclosure has chainablo light weight poly cover which is vandal resistant, U. V. stabile, and easy to lift 2 Enclosure may be ordered poly foam insulated for cold weather locations (enclosure 48" diameter x 48" tall) 3 Refill through combination vent or hydrant with 2.5" hose (50 PSI max) 4 Installation must follow A.E.& S. "Installation Handbook" ''1 High volume guard on 2" overflow pipe NFIU CISTERN Natural hillside location au4/�y�s snrt i• .m' . Ng aid= mittrirtrrr iwomponents r .‘ " •1 }Al 1 )II''�r i /1 ��rrrifat PP i• nlRlilof>eA/ C'! ,.+IrtpnfitntllR tr17,7rr1107moll:tUoRlir n Install bed drain to the side of the tank, not under the tank Bed drain outlet A Combination PVC vent / refill 2.5" NST -F swivel & plug [3 Manway access enclosure (413" diameter) with chainable black polyethylene cover C 4" level inspection port or safe level float type indicator gauge D Overflow with flexible coupling, running continuously downhill to daylight E Stainless steel flexible coupling at discharge fitting F Bolt -In style 6" fitting located on end cap for discharge (bolt -In fittings may be field installed) G Gate valve in frost free buried location with valve control rod sleeve and cover at surface H Retaining wall if necessary City stylo fire hydrant (traditional 4.5" x 2.5" x 2.5" discharge configuration) Pipe bollards in concrete J K L Thrust block and hydrant shoe with gravel -filled drain down area M Corrugated polyethylene drain pipe at edge of bed discharging ground water continuously down hill to daylight Road surface Descriptive of fire department applications Revised 10/97 0 • • OVERVIEW SUBDIVISION GEOLOGY STATEMENT The geologic mapping in the region of the Overview Subdivision is based on Kirkham and Widmann's 1997 mapping (See attached Figure 1). The map shows that the subdivision is located within an area of Quaternary to Tertiary collapse debris (QTcd). A cross section (Figure 2) from the same publication shows the same relationship. The map designations for the various geologic units are: Quaternary Surficial Deposits Qsw Sheetwash deposits Qac Alluvium and colluvium Qc Colluvium Qls Landslide deposits Bedrock Deposits QTcd Quaternary — Tertiary collapse debris Tta Tertiary Trachyandesite Tb Tertiary Basalt PPm Permian - Pennsylvanian Maroon Formation The geologic description from Kirkham and Widmann (1997) for the collapse debris unit is as follows: "Collapse debris (Pleistocene and late Tertiary) --- Heterogeneous deposits of moderately to severely deformed bedrock and overlying undeformed to moderately deformed surficial deposits. Formed in response to differential vertical collapse or regional subsidence resulting from dissolution of underlying thick beds of evaporite, primarily halite, and / or flowage of the evaporitic rocks out from beneath the area. Highly fractured and locally brecciated basalt and small, intact but strongly tilted blocks of basalt ranging up to about 20 acres in size comprise the predominant type of bedrock within the collapse debris at the ground surface. Lesser amounts of deformed Maroon Formation locally occur within the collapse debris. Unit probably includes broken rock debris from the Eagle Valley Formation at depth. Various types of surficial deposits, including loess, may be incorporated into the collapse debris. Unit grades to folded and faulted bedrock where less deformed and to landslide deposits where there appears to be a significant horizontal component to the direction of collapse, such as on the east side of Spring Valley. Contacts between collapse debris and basalt or landslide deposits are gradational. May be • • prone to settlement problems where fine-grained, low-density deposits of loess occur and to differential settlement where these deposits abut basalt rubble. Unit may be difficult to excavate because of the abrupt changes in lithology and presence of large blocks of basalt" Additional geologic information is provided by the driller's well construction report for the Overview Well, attached. A graphical representation of the well is provided in Figure 3. The geologic units noted by the driller are Tertiary Basalt (Tb) overlying the Pennsylvanian Maroon Formation (PPm). This is a normal sequence for the Spring Valley region, which would signify that the area surrounding the well has not been deformed or has had only minor deformation caused by the collapse features. The well driller did not indicate that Eagle Valley Formation was intersected in the Overview Well. While there is no direct evidence that building problems may occur at the Overview Subdivision, it is believed that care will need to be taken when constructing buildings. Precautions for settlement should be followed when building on loess deposits. Excavation may be more difficult and costly due to the possible presence of large basalt blocks. Notes should be added to the subdivision plat notifying future buyers of these potential problems. We recommend that each residence have an onsite soil analysis and a foundation designed by a registered professional engineer. Zancanella and Associates, Inc. Bradley C. Peek, Geologist Attachments Z:\97000's\97404 Rudd, Wayne\97404.08 Overview Subdivision\Geol Statement.doc J Tb • R88W \ \, --"--- -........-.7 r` t %',-'1 Qac \ Tta ti Qac ...a.* Qsw,. BASE FROM: Kirkham, R. M. Open—File Rept. 97-3. Tb LTh L=:_j and Widmann, 8. L., 1997, Geol. Map of the Carbondale Quad., Garfield County, 5() 00 00 Scale in Feet QTcd Colorado: Colo. GeoL Surv. T6S T7S GEOLOGIC MAP SCALE: 1" = 1000' DATE: NOV. 22, 2004 SHEET: 1 OF 1 DRAWN BY: BCP CHKD BY: BCP APPD BY: TPB DRAWING: Prelim—Plat.dwg OVERVIEW SUBDIVISION ZANCANELLA AND ASSOC/AYES, /NC. ENG/NEER/NC CONSULTANTS POST %TICE BOX 1908 - 1005 C00 R AVENUE CLEN11000 SPRINGS. COLORADO 81602 (970) 945-5700 IGURE NO. 1 PROJECT: 17404.08 BASE FROM: Kirkham, R Open -File Rept. 97-3. AI Pe PROPERTY �I PIPm QTed Pre- Pee Rocks VERVIEW WELL [Pee Tta M. and Widmann, B. L., 1997, Geol. Map of the Carbondale Quad., Garfield County, Colorado: Colo. Geol. Surv. NO VERTICAL EXAGGERATION Scale in Feet METERS — 2500 — 2000 — Sea GEOLOGIC CROSS SECTION SCALE: AS SHOWN DATE: NOV 19, 2004 SHEET: 1 OF 1 DRAWN BY: BCP CHKD BY: BCP APPD BY; TPB DRAWING: Prelim-Plot.dwg OVERVIEW SUBDIVISION ZANCANELLA AND ASSOC/,41E.5; INC ENO/NE-LW/NC CONSUL TANTS POST OFFICE 6011 1000 - 1000 COOPER AVENUE CLENN000 5PRiNOS, COLORADO 81802 (0701 045-37( FIGURE NO. PROJECT:1 74.111t nA GROUND LEVEL Tertiary Basalt 0 y/\��//%/�\� \\ . CEMENT 10'-40' --• 0' TO 40' 20- 9' HOLE DIAMETER -1' TO 40' 0,240 WALL 40- 60- 7' PLAIN STEEL CSG 40' TO 160' Pennsytvanian Maroon Formation 80- 6,5' HOLE DIAMETER 36' TO 120' 0.250 100- 120- - •0 WALL 5,5' PVC CSG STATIC WATER LEVEL 107,0' ON JUNE 1, 2004 1 140- 120' TO 160' 0.250 WALL 5,5' PVC PERF CSG TOTAL DEPTH 160- 160' OVERVIEW WELL WELL DETAIL /\<\ OVERVIEW SUBDIVISION FIGURE NO, NOT TO SCALE DATE JUNE 22, 2004 SHEET 1 OF 1 / ZANSCALE: CANELLA AND ASSOCIATES, INC. DRAWN BY: CHKD BY: APPD BY: PLAN NO. ENGINEERING CONSUL TANTS BCP BCP TAZ WeIlDetail.dwg POST OiF10E BOX 1908 - 1005 COOPER AVENUE GLEN9000 SPRINGS, COLORADO 81802 (970) 645-5700 PROJECT: 17404.08 WELL CONSTRUCTIONID TEST REPORT ' STATE OF COLORADO, OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER _iROFFICE- USE ONLY 1. WELL PERMIT NUMBER 250297 2 Owner Name(s): Rudd Construction Mailing Address: 0132 Park Ave. City, State, Zip : Basalt, Co. 81621 Phone # : 970-927-9119 APPROVAL # GWS31-91.03 WELL LOCATION AS DRILLED 88 z NE 1/4 SE 1/4 Sec: 35 Twp: 6 S Range: W DISTANCES FROM SEC. LINES 1511 ft. from South Sec. line and 325 ft. from East Sec. Line OR Northing: Easting: SUBDIVISION: 29 Peaks LOT: B BLOCK: FILING (UNIT): STREET ADDRESS AT LOCATION _ 4. GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION ft. DRILLING METHOD Air Rotary DATE COMPLETED: 5/21/2003 TOTAL DEPTH: 160 DEPTH COMPLETION: 160 5. GEOLOGIC LOG 6. HOLE DIAMETER (in) FROM (if) TO (ft) Death Type of Material (Size. Color. and Type) 9.0 I 0 40 000-020 Voicanics 6.5 40 160 020-160 Maroon Formation 1 7. PLAIN CASING OD (In) I Kind Wall Size From (ft) To (ft) 7.0 1 Steal 0.240 -1 40 5.5 I PVC 0.250 36 1 120 1 1 PERE. CASING : Screen Slot Size 5.5 PVC 0.250 120 160 Water Located: 120- Remarks : 8. Filter Pack Material : Size : Interval : 9. Packer Placement Type : Depth : 10. GROUTING RECORD Material Amoumt i Density interval Placement Cement 5 sks 6 eal/sk 10-40 poured , I I I J 11. DISINFECTION : Type : HTH Amt. Used : 3 oz_ 12. WELL TEST DATA : () Check Box If Test Data Is Submitted On Supplemental TESTING METHOD : Air Compressor Static Level : 105 ft. Date/Time Measured 5/21/2003 Production Rate 15 gpm Pumping Level : Total ft. Date/Time Measured 5/21/2003 Test Length : 2 hours Test Remarks : 13.1 have read the btmcments mado herein anal latow the contents tttacoi. and that thoy are true to my knowledge. (Pursuant to Secnon 24-4-1-4 (13)(a) (RSS. the ma in of false statements consutotes perjury in the second degce and is puniahab{e as a claw 1 rtnsdcneanor ) CONTRACTOR : Sh®lton Drilling Corp_ Phone : (970) 927-4132 Mailing Address : P.O. Box 1059 Basalt, Co. 81621 Lic. No. 1095 Name / Title (Please Type or Print) Wayne Shelton / President Signature Date 6I26l2003 • Non -Technical Descriptions Soil Survey Area: 655 ASPEN -GYPSUM AREA, COLORADO, PARTS OF T • !'1T T !'1 • TI TTTT T\ • 1T -1 -ray TTYTI T el "NT T1 T/TTT CT Map unit: 95 Showalter-Morval complex, 15 to 25 percent slopes Description Categoiy: SOI This map unit is on alluvial fans, high terraces, and valley sides. This unit is 45 percent Showalter very stony loam and 35 percent Morval loam. The Showalter soil is deep and well -drained. It formed in alluvium derived dominantly from basalt. The surface is covered with 10 to 15 percent stones, 5 percent cobble, and 5 percent gravel. The surface layer is very stony loam 8 inches thick. The upp er 3 inches of the subsoil is very cobbly clay loam. The lower 28 inches of the subsoil is very cobbly clay. The substratum to a depth of 60 inches or more is very cobbly clay loam. Permeability is slow. Available water capacity is moderate. Effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. Runoff is rapid, and the hazard of water erosion is high to very high. The Morval soil is deep and well -drained. It formed in alluvium derived dominantly from basalt. The surface layer is loam 7 inches thick. The upper 12 inches of the subsoil is clay loam. The lower 4 inches is loam. The substratum to a depth of 60 inch es or more is loam. Permeability is moderate. Available water capacity is moderate. Effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. Runoff is rapid, and the hazard of water erosion is very high. Monday, July 19, 2004 Page 1 of 1 (Joins sheet 14) R. 88 V!.I R. 87 06 95 ( P.O. Box 1908 1005 Cooper Ave. Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 Z4NCaNELL4 414ID 455OCi4TES, INC. .7/ ENGIraEE13ING CON ULT4N T5 June 24, 2004 Mr. Mark Bean Garfield County Planning Department 108 Eighth Street, Suite 201 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 RE: Overview Subdivision Dear Mark: (970) 945-5700 (970) 945-1253 Fax This report presents the findings of the water supply investigations performed by Zancanella and Associates, Inc. for the proposed Overview Subdivision. Information contained in this report covers estimated future domestic water uses, legal water supply, well pump test, and water quality analyses. Water Requirements The new subdivision will consist of 3 Tots with one dwelling unit each. We have assumed that each EQR will represent 3.5 people using 100 gallons of water per person per day. Water will be diverted to irrigate up to 10,000 square feet of lawn or other equivalent outside uses for each residence. Legal Supply As can be seen from Table 1, the subdivision will divert an average 2.66 AF annually, and consumptively use 1.37 AF. The peak month of June would require a continuous average diversion of 3.63 gpm. The subdivision is to be supplied by a shared exempt domestic well which has been drilled and tested. The Overview Well was drilled under permit number 250297 (copy attached). This is an exempt domestic permit, intended to serve a maximum of three residences and to be the only well on the 43.82 acre tract. Physical Supply The Overview Well was completed on May 21, 2003 by Shelton Drilling Corporation at a total depth of 160 feet. The well is located in the NE 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section 35, Township 6 South, Range 88 West of the 6th P.M. The location of the well can be plotted 1511 feet from the south section line and 325 feet from the east section line. The approximate location of the well and the Overview Subdivision boundary are shown on the attached general location map, Figure 1. The well was drilled through a 20 foot section of Tertiary basalt before entering the Pennsylvanian Maroon from 20 feet to the total depth of • • the well. A copy of the well construction report and a graphical representation of the well (Figure 2) are attached. A 4 hour pump test of the Overview Well was conducted on June 1, 2004 by J & M Pump Company utilizing the electric submersible pump. The pump test was performed at a rate of 15 gallons per minute (gpm). The rate was maintained at 15 gpm throughout the 4 hour test period. The drawdown and time data collected during the test are presented in Table 2. We have plotted the results of the test in a water level vs. time curve as shown on the attached Figure 3. The maximum drawdown during the 4 hour test was 0.17 feet. The water level stabilized early in the test and did not vary through the remainder of the test. Because of the relatively small amount of drawdown, no recovery data were collected. The test indicates that the well will probably be able to operate for extended periods at a rate of approximately 15 gpm. This amount, with water storage to handle peak demands, should be adequate to serve the 3 Tots. It is our understanding that 10,000 gallons of shared fire and peak demand storage will be installed. -- Water Quality Water samples were collected during the pump test and sent to ACZ Laboratories in Steamboat Springs for independent analyses. The lab tests included analyses for various inorganic chemicals, nitrate/nitrite, total dissolved solids (TDS) and some of the physical properties of the water. A total coliform bacteria sample was collected and sent to the state lab in Grand Junction for analysis. The coliform bacteria test indicates that coliform bacteria were absent from the sample. The result from the bacteria test is attached. Results of the analyses from ACZ Labs are pending. They will be forwarded to your office as soon as they are received. If you have any questions, please call our office at (970) 945-5700. Very truly yours, Zancanella and Associates, Inc. Thomas A. Zancanella, P.E. Bradley C. Pe- , Geologist Attachments cc: Wayne Rudd Z:\97000's\97404 Rudd, Wayne\97404.08 Overview Subdivision\Bean-WaterSupply.doc 2 Table 1 Overview Subdivision - Estimated Water Requirements Domestic Demands Domestic Demands Other Demands No. of EQR's Residential 3.0 units No. of EQRs for ADU s 0.0 units Pond Surface Area 0 acres No. persons/residence 3.5 cap/unit No. persons/unit 3.5 cap/unit Annual Net Evaporation 2.74 ft No. gallons/person/day 100 gpcd No. gallons/person/day 100 gpcd Percent Consumed 15% Percent Consumed 15% Lawn Irrigation 10000 sq-ft/unit Lawn Irrigation 1500 sq-ft/unit Irrigated Open Space 0 acres Application Efficiency 80% Application Efficiency 80% Application Efficiency 80% Crop Irrig reqmnt (CIR) 1.73 ft Crop Irrig reqmnt (C1R) 1.73 ft Crop Irrig reqmnt (CIR) 1.73 ft Water Use Calculations Diversion Requirements (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) Domestic ADUs Dom\Comm Open Space Pond Average Domestic ADUs Dom\Comm Open Space Pond Average Month In-house In-house Irrigation Irrigation Evap. Total Flow for Dom In-house In-house Irrigation Irrigation Evap. Total Consumption (ac -ft) (ac -ft) (ac -ft) (ac -ft) (ac -ft) (ac -ft) (gpm) (ac -ft) (ac -ft) (ac -ft) (ac -ft) (ac -ft) (ac -ft) (gpm) January 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.73 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.11 February 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.73 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.11 March 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.73 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.11 April 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.73 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.11 May 0.10 0.00 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.39 2.86 0.01 0.00 0.23 0.00 0.00 0.25 1.81 June 0.10 0.00 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.48 3.63 0.01 0.00 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.32 2.43 July 0.10 0.00 0.36 0.00 0.00 0.46 3.33 0.01 0.00 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.30 2.19 August 0.10 0.00 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.32 2.36 0.01 0.00 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.19 1.41 September 0.10 0.00 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.29 2.17 0.01 0.00 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.17 1.27 October 0.10 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.14 1.01 0.01 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.34 November 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.73 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.11 December 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.73 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.11 Annual 1.18 0.00 1.49 0.00 0.00 2.66 0.18 0.00 1.19 0.00 0.00 1.37 Consumptive Use 24 -Jun -04 Zancanella & Assoc., Inc. Water Resources Engineers Glenwood Springs, CO Job# 97404.08\eqruse.xls R88W 10 0 1 00 3000 Scale in Feet T6S T7S PROJECT LOCATION MAP SCALE: = 2000' DATE: SHEET: MAY 10, 2004 1 OF 1 DRAWN BY: ICHKD BY: BCP BCP APPD BY: TAZ DRAWING: LocTopo.dwg OVERVIEW SUBDIVISION ZANCANELLA AND ASSOC/A TES, /NC ENC/NEER/NC CONSULTANTS POST OGFlCE BOX 1908 -loos MOPER MeiLIE GCENIYD00 SPMNGS, COLORAD0 81602 (970) 945-5700 FIGURE NO. 1 PROJECT:17404.08 GROUND LEVEL Tertiary Basalt Pennsylvanian Maroon formation TOTAL DEPTH 160' 0 20- 40 60 80- 100 120 140- 160 CEMENT 10'-40' 0' TO 40' 9' HOLE DIAMETER -1' TO 40' 0,240 WALL 7' PLAIN STEEL CSG 40' TO 160' 6.5' HOLE DIAMETER 36' TO 120' 0.250 WALL 5.5' PVC CSG - STATIC WATER LEVEL 107.0' ON JUNE 1, 2004 120' TO 160' 0.250 WALL 5,5' PVC PERF CSG OVERVIEW WELL WELL DETAIL SCALE. NOT TO SCALE DATE JUNE 22, 2004 SHEET 1 OF 1 DRAWN BY: I CHKD BY: BCP I v BCP APPD BY: TAZ PLAN NO. Well Detail .dwg OVERVIEW SUBDIVISION ZANCANEL L A ANIS ASSOCIATES, INC ENGINEERING CONSUL TANTS POST OFFlCE Box 190E - 1005 COOPER AVENUE CLENW000 SPRINGS, COLORADO 81602 (970) 945-5700 FIGURE NO. 2 PROJECT: 17404.08 • • Well ID: TABLE 2 Pump Test Data Overview Subdivision Well Job No.: 17404.08 Client: Wayne Rudd Test By: J & M Pump Analysis By: BCP M.P. = Top of Casing Q = 15 gpm r= ft S.W.L. = 107.0 ft b= ft Time/Date on: 6/1/04 8:30 AM Time/Date off: 6/1/04 12:30 PM Test Length: 4:00:00 total time TIME Time (minutes) W.L. Measurement Drawdown (feet) Q (gpm) t' (minutes) t/t' (feet) (inches) 6/1/04 8:30 AM 0 107 0.0 SWL 0 6/1/04 8:31 AM 1 107 2.0 0.17 15 6/1/04 8:32 AM 2 107 2.0 0.17 15 6/1/04 8:33 AM 3 107 2.0 0.17 15 6/1/04 8:34 AM 4 107 2.0 0.17 15 6/1/04 8:35 AM 5 107 2.0 0.17 15 6/1/04 8:36 AM 6 107 2.0 0.17 15 6/1/04 8:37 AM 7 107 2.0 0.17 15 6/1/04 8:38 AM 8 107 2.0 0.17 15 6/1/04 8:39 AM 9 107 2.0 0.17 15 6/1/04 8:40 AM 10 107 2.0 0.17 15 6/1/04 8:42 AM 12 107 2.0 0.17 15 6/1/04 8:44 AM 14 107 2.0 0.17 15 6/1/04 8:46 AM 16 107 2.0 0.17 15 6/1/04 8:50 AM 20 107 2.0 0.17 15 6/1/04 8:55 AM 25 107 2.0 0.17 15 6/1/04 9:00 AM 30 107 2.0 0.17 15 6/1/04 9:10 AM 40 107 2.0 0.17 15 6/1/04 9:20 AM 50 107 2.0 0.17 15 6/1/04 9:30 AM 60 107 2.0 0.17 15 6/1/04 9:45 AM 75 107 2.0 0.17 15 6/1/04 10:00 AM 90 107 2.0 0.17 15 6/1/04 10:15 AM 105 107 2.0 0.17 15 6/1/04 10:30 AM 120 107 2.0 0.17 15 6/1/04 11:00 AM 150 107 2.0 0.17 15 6/1/04 11:30 AM 180 107 2.0 0.17 15 6/1/04 12:00 PM 210 107 2.0 0.17 15 6/1/04 12:30 PM 240 107 2.0 0.17 15 6/23/2004 Zancanella & Associates, Inc. Well Pump Test.xls Water Level (ft) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 1 10 Figure 3 Pumping Test - 6/1/04 Overview Subdivision Well 100 Time (min) 1,000 10,000 100,000 Q = 15 gpm throughout test. 1.._�.a.aul�——1e ate!?"- 110 120 130 140 150 160 Static Water Level = 107.0 ft. Pump Set at 155 ft. Total Depth = 160 ft. 6/3/2004 Zancanella & Associates, Inc. Well Pump Test.xls Form No. OFFICE OF TtiTATE ENGINEER GWS -25 COLORADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 818 Centennial Bldg., 1313 Sherman St., Denver, Colorado 80203 (303) 866-3581 APPLICANT RUDD CONSTRUCTION 0132 PARK AVE BASALT, CO 81621- (970) 927-9119 PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A WELL 1095 WELL PERMIT NUMBER 250297 DIV. 5 WD 38 DES. BASIN MD APPROVED WELL LOCATION GARFIELD COUNTY NE 1/4 SE 1/4 Section 35 Township 6 S Range 88 W Sixth P.M. DISTANCES FROM SECTION LINES Ft. from Ft. from UTM COORDINATES Northing: Section Line Section Line Easting: ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT CONFER A WATER RIGHT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1) This well shall be used in such a way as to cause no material injury to existing water rights. The issuance of this permit does not assure the applicant that no injury will occur to another vested water right or preclude another owner of a vested water right from seeking relief in a civil court action. 2) The construction of this well shall be in compliance with the Water Well Construction Rules 2 CCR 402-2, unless approval of a variance has been granted by the State Board of Examiners of Water Well Construction and Pump Installation Contractors in accordance with Rule 18. 3) Approved pursuant to CRS 37-92-602(3)(b)(II)(A) as the only well on a tract of land of 43.82 acres described as that portion of the NE 1/4 of the SE 1/4, Sec. 35, Twp. 6 South, Rng. 88 West, 6th P.M., Garfield County, more particularly described on the attached exhibit A. This well is identified as the Parcel B Well. 4) The use of ground water from this well is limited to fire protection, ordinary household purposes inside not more than threes (3),Single family dwellings, the irrigation of not more than one (1) acre of home gardens and lawns, and the watering of`doriestic animals. 5) The maximum pumping rate of this well shall not exceed 15 GPM. 6) The retum flow from the use of this well must be through an individual waste water disposal system of the non -evaporative type where the water is returned to the same stream system in which the well is located. 7) This well shall be constructed not more than 200 feet from the location specified on this permit. NOTE: Parcel Identification Number (PIN): 23-2187-354-00-145 9-+-L 7-2-- NOTE: vNOTE: Assessor Tax Schedule Number: R007347 03 APPROVED DMW \Receipt No. 0509413C State Engineer By DATE ISSUED 05-14-2003 EXPIRATION DATE 05-14-2005 Tuesday, April 06, 2004 9:52 AM Wayne Shelton 970-927-3801 p01 WELL CONSTRUCTION AND TEST REPORT STATE OF COLORADO, OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER FOR OFFICE USE ONLY 1. WELL PERMIT NUMBER 250297 2 Owner Name(s): Rudd Construction Mailing Address: 0132 Park Ave. City, State, Zip : Basalt, Co. 81621 Phone # : 970-927-9119 APPROVAL # 0WS31-91-03 WELL LOCATION AS DRILLED NE 1/4 SE 1/4 Sec: 35 Twp: 6 5 Range: 88 W 3' DISTANCES FROM SEC. LINES 1511 ft. from South Sec. line and 325 ft. from East Sec. line OR Northing: Easting: SUBDIVISION: 29 Peaks LOT: B BLOCK: FILING (UNIT): STREET ADDRESS AT LOCATION 4. GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION ft. DRILLING METHOD Air Rotary DATE COMPLETED: 5/21/2003 TOTAL DEPTH: 160 DEPTH COMPLETION: 160 6. HOLE DIAMETER (in) PROM (ft) TO (ft) 5. GEOLOGIC LOG Depth Type of Material (Size, Color. and Type) 9.0 0 40 000-020 Volcanics_, 6.5 40 160 020-160 Ma COM Formation 7. PLAIN CASING OD (in) Kind Wall Size From (ft) To (ft) 7.0 Steel 0.240 -1 40 5.5 PVC 0.250 36 120 PERF. CASINO : Screen Slot Size 5.5 PVC 0.250 120 160 Water Located: Remarks : 120-4- 8. Filter Pack Material : S1z0 , Interval : 9. Packer Placement Type : Depth . 10. GROUTING RECORD Material Amount Density Interval Placement Cement 5 sks 6 gal/sk 10-40 _poured 11. DISINFECTION : Type : HTH Amt. Used : 3 oz 12. WELL TEST DATA : () Check Box If Test Data Is Submitted On Supplemental TESTING METHOD : Air Compressor Static Level : 105 ft. Date/Time Measured 5/21/2003 Production Rate 15 gpm Pumping Level : Total ft. Date/Time Measured 5/21/2003 Test Length : 2 hours Test Remarks : 13. I have read the, statemcnts mad lwroin it 1 JOW' the coetents thcteof, and lhat tlroy are true to my knowledge (Pursuant to Section 24-4-1-4 (13)(a) CRS, the =king Of fals.e statements conslitutesperJulymthe scconddcgecatiditpuaishable aaaclass 1 misdcrneanar.) phone : (970) 927-4182 CONTRACTOR : Shelton Drilling Corp. Lio, No. 1095 Mailing Address : P.O. Box 1059 Basalt, Co. 81621 Name / Title (Please Type or Print) Wayne Shelton / President Signature Date 6/26/2003 LABORATORY & RADIATION SERVICES US MAIL WATER 8100 LOWRY BOULEVARD PO BOX 17123 BACTERIOLOGY Colorado Deportment DENVER, CO 80230-6928 DENVER, CO 80217 dRSlicHnk6 ad Fawwmme SAMPLE INFORMATION: ❑ COMMUNITY 0 NON -COMMUNITY PRIVATE 0 ROUTINE 'FLAW 0 REPEAT FOR THE MONTH OF 'SPECIAL PURPOSE 0 FINISHED PWS ID -6i,) NAME,QF SYSTEM Cd "-ry 2-0r4b ADDRESS CHLORINE RESIDUAL _ I CITY COUNTY - MG/L 122 COLLECTED DATE TIME BY /O// I/:,1 PM ❑ AM RECEIVED / / ❑ PM ORDERED BY: (SAMPLE MAY NOT BE TESTED IF ALL INFORMATION IS NOT PROVIDED) (970 FEE STAMP LAB 106 (07/97) 2') PHONE 47 C4-+(J,i4-55. NAME (lee), , TNI ADDRESS 4--i kAt o C�a i6,1)l CIT'f ; STATE ; ZIP TEST ORDERED L J JTD SACT. ❑ OTHER RESULTS: SEE REVERSE FOR EXPLAyX1 ON TOTAL COLIFORM ❑ PRESENT ABSENT MOST PROBABLE NO COLIFORM/100ML ❑ DENVER ANALYST AN GRD. JCT. P.O. Box 1908 1005 Cooper Ave. Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 Z4NC4NE1.1.4 4NlD 4S5OC14TE-, iNC. ENGINEERING" CONSULT4NTS July 2, 2004 Mr. Mafk Bean Garfield County Planning Department 108 /Eighth Street, Suite 201 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 RE: Overview Subdivision Dear Mark: (970) 945-5700 (970) 945-1253 Fax In our letter report of June 24, 2004, we discussed the water supply for the proposed Overview Subdivision. At that time we had not received the water quality results from the lab. This report talks about the final water quality results and is to serve as a supplement to the June 24 report. Water Quality Water samples were collected during the pump test of the Overview Well and sent to ACZ Laboratories in Steamboat Springs for independent analyses. The lab tests included analyses for various inorganic chemicals, nitrate/nitrite, total dissolved solids (TDS) and some of the physical properties of the water. A total coliform bacteria sample was collected and sent to the state lab in Grand Junction for analysis. The coliform bacteria test indicates that coliform bacteria were absent from the sample. The result from the bacteria test is attached. Results of the analyses from ACZ Labs are also attached and are summarized in the table below: Analyte Lab Result Maximum Centam. Level (MCL) Units Arsenic 0.0017 0.05 mg/l Barium 0.381 2 moll Beryllium Not Detected 0.004 mall Cadmium Not Detected 0.005 mall Calcium 43.7 N/A mgil Chromium Not Detected 0.1 mail Cooper Not Detected 1.3 mg/1 Iron 0.05 0.3 mg/I I Lead Not Detected 0.015 mg/I Magnesium 7.5 N/A mg/I Manganese Not Detected 0.05 m e/I Mercury Not Detected 0.002 mail Nickel Not Detected N/A mo/I Potassium 0.8 N/A mg/I Selenium Not Detected 0.05 mg/1 Silver Not Detected 0.10 mg/I Sodium 5.2 N/A mg/1 Thallium Not Detected 0.002 mg/I Alkalinity 147 N/A v � m g/I Chloride 2 250 mg/1 Conductivity 249 N/A /,cmhos/cm Fluoride 0.1 4 mg/I Hardness 140 N/A mg/I Nitrate 0.55 10 mg/1 Nitrite Not Detected 1 mg/I pH 7.4 N/A pH Units Sulfate Not Detected 250 1 mg/1 TDS 150 500 mg/1 Turbidity 0.1 _ 1 I NenhPinmatrin I Iniic I Note: Maximum Contaminant Levels are established by the Colorado Department of Puolic Health & Environment and the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. As can be seen from the above table, for all of the analytes tested, none were above their respective MCLs. If you have any questions, please call our office at (970) 945-5700. Very truly yours, Zancanella and Associates, Inc. Thomas A. Zancanella, P.E. Bradley C. Peek!Geologist Attachments ‘/ cc: Wayne Rudd Z:',97000's197404 Rudd, Wayne \97404.08 Overview Subdivision\Bean-WaterQual.doc .041qCZ Laboratories, Inc, 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487(800) 334-5493 Zancanella & Associates Prcject ID: RUDD/OVERVIEW Sample ID: OVERVIEW WELL ACZ Sample ID: Date Sampled: Date Received: Sample Matrix: L46086-01 06101104 11:40 06/03/04 Drinking Water Metals Analysis EFAMe tro Arsenic. total M200.8 ICP -MS recoverable Barium, total M200.7 ICP recoverable Beryllium, total M200.8 ICP -MS recoverable Cadmium, total M200.8 ICP -MS recoverable Calcium, dissolved M200.7 ICP Chromium, total M200.8 ICP -MS recoverable Copper, total M200.8 ICP -MS recoverable Iron, total recoverable M200.7 ICP Lead, total recoverable M200.8 ICP -MS Magnesium, dissolved M200.7 ICP Manganese, total M200.7 ICP recoverable Mercury, total Nickel. total recoverable Potassium, dissolved M200.7 !CP M245.1 CVAA M200.7 ICP Seienium, total M200.8 ICP -MS recoverable Silver, total recoverable M200.7 IC? Sodium. dissolved M200.7 ICP Thallium, total M200.8 ICP -MS recoverable Metals Prep Total Recoverable Digestion Total Recoverable Digestion Result: Quab xcE 0.0017 0.381 43.7 8 U U U U 0.05 B 7.5 0.8 5.2 U U U U B U U U • mg/L mg/L mg/L mgiL mg/L mgiL mg/L mgiL mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mgiL mgiL mg/L ma/L mg/L CM= 0.0005 0.003 06/25/04 20:49 jb 0.003 0.01 06/10/04 0:43 0.0005 0.003 06/25/04 20:49 0.0005 0.003 06/25/04 6:40 0.2 1 06/23/04 20:53 0.0005 0.003 06/25/04 6:40 0.003 0.01 06/25/04 6:40 0.01 0.05 06/15/04 13:04 0.0005 0.003 06/25/04 6:40 0.2 1 06/23/04 20:53 0.005 0.03 06/10/04 0:43 0.0002 0.001 06/21/04 14:54 0.01 0.05 06/10/04 0:43 0.3 1 06/10/04 11:47 0.0005 0.003 06/29/04 23:09 0.005 0.03 06/17/04 9:47 0.3 1 06/24/04 15:51 0.0003 0.001 06/25/04 6:40 Result Qualrs`. XIX Lb rlt • = 1N!]! MIE ; M200.2 ICP -MS M200.2 ICP 06/22/04 15:47 scp jb jb wfg jb jb sop jb wfg scp llc scp wig jb scp scp jb Icj 06/16/04 8:06 wfg REPIN.01.11.00.01 ' Please refer to Extended Qualifier Report for detail. L46086: Page 3 of 9 • ACZ Laboratories, Inc. 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487(800) 334-5493 Zancanella & Associates Project ID: RUDD/OVERVIEW Sample ID: OVERVIEW WELL ACZ Sample ID: Date Sampled: Date Received: Sample Matrix: L46086-01 06/01/04 11:40 06/03/04 Drinking Water Wet Chemistry Erarain" oar Alkalinity as CaCO3 Bicarbonate as CaCO3 Carbonate as CaCO3 Hydroxide as CaCO3 Total Alkalinity Cation -Anion Balance Cation -Anion Balance Sum of Anions Sum of Cations Chloride Calor Conductivity @25C Fluoride Hardness as CaCO3 Lab Filtration Lab Filtration & Acidification Nitrate as N, dissolved Nitrate/Nitrite as N, dissolved Nitrite as N, dissolved pH (lab) Residue, Filterable (TDS) @180C Sulfate TOS (calculated) TDS (ratio - measured/calculated) Turbidity SM23208 - Titration Calculation M325.2 - Colorimetric M110.1 • Colorimetric M120.1 • Meter SM4500F-C SM23403 - Calculation SM 3030 B SM 3030 B E esti :; ataidt,;.:xcr, 147 147 0.0 3.0 3.0 2 249 0.1 140 Calculation: NO3NO2 minus NO2 0.55 M353.2 - Automated Cadmium Reduction M353.2 - Automated Cadmium Reduction M150.1 - E!ectrometric SM2540C - Gravimetric M375.3 - Gravimetric Calculation Calculation M180.1 - Nephelometric Units a .:. U U B UH B 0.55 H UH 7.4 H 180 U 150 1.20 0.1 BH mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L meq/L megiL ' mg/L • Co/Pt umhos/cm mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L units mg/L mg/L mg/L NTU 2 10 06/05/04 0:00 2 10 06/05/04 0:00 2 10 06/05/04 0:00 2 10 06/05/04 0:00 07/01/04 0:00 0.1 0.5 07/01/04 0:00 0.1 0.5 07/01/04 0:00 1 5 06/19/04 15:18 5 5 06/04/04 10:07 1 10 06/05/04 12:58 0.1 0.5 06/17/04 10:07 1 7 07/01/04 0:00 06/04/04 9:40 06/04/04 13:00 Analyst bf bf bf bf calc calc calc kmc bf bf mah catc bd bd 0.02 0.1 07/01/04 0:00 calc 0.02 0.1 06/03/04 20:36 jjr 0.01 0.05 06/03/04 18:43 jjr 0.1 0.1 06/05/04 12:58 10 20 06/08/04 12:12 10 50 06/17/04 9:24 10 50 07/01/04 0:00 07/01/04 0:00 0.1 0.5 06/04/04 10:26 bf man djb calc calc bf REPIN.01.11.00.01 • Please refer to Extended Qualifier Report for detail. IL46086: Page 4 of 9 Colorado ^ - d Ruhne fidrh LABORATORY & RAOIA.TION SERVICES 8100 LOWRY BOULEVARD DENVER, CO 80230-6928 US MAIL FO 80x 17123 DENVER. CO 80217 • WATER BACTERIOLOGY SAMPLE INFORMATION: O COMMUNITY ❑ NON -COMMUNITY "cG"'RIVATE PWS ID C.v» /n✓L) I ❑ ROUTINE Sa..RAw I I PECIAL PURPOSE O FINISHED -/mac i22 10 CI REPEAT FOR THE .MONTH OF NAmaJDF SYSTEM �J J�.r..y /J /75-- CHLORINERESIDUAL ADDRESS O CITY COUNTY COU 1 � MG/L ORDERED BY: (SAMPLE ,MAY NOT BE TESTED IF ALL INFORMATION IS NOT PROVIDED) (970 )94c --57D-25 FEE STAMP LAB 106 (07/97) PHONE NAME 7ccZ (ley A) Z 2/E ADDRESS LZ.frlvtl co SP,efi<-'G�. C1 CITY : STATE 1 ZIP TEST ORDERED TO SACT O OTHER COLLECTED DATE TIME BY /n /` I / aM O AM RECEIVED ❑ PM RESULTS: SEE REVERSE FOR ' PLA ON TOTAL COLIFORM L_ J PRESENT ABSENT MOST PROBABLE NO ❑ DENVER E ANALYST COLIFORM/100ML GRD. JCT. i • Wastewater Treatment: Wastewater treatment shall be supplied to each Lot by individual sewage treatment system ("ISDS") installed by each Owner in accordance with the ISDS Regulations of Garfield County, and maintained by each Owner in accordance with the provisions of the ISDS Maintenance Plan set forth below. A percolation test was performed on the property resulting in an average percolation rate of 20 minutes per inch. This indicates that a standard septic tank and leach field system would be appropriate. Each lot owner will be required to do a percolation test for the design of their specific system in the specific area chosen for their absorption area. ISDS Maintenance: a. Owner's Maintenance Responsibility. Except as provided otherwise in covenants or by a written agreement with the homeowner's association, all maintenance of individual Lots, including, individual sewage disposal systems (ISDS), utility systems and utility lines from the point of connection to the common system shall be the sole responsibility of the respective Lot Owners. In the event a Lot Owner should fail to keep any utility system (including any ISDS) in good repair, the homeowner's association, without limiting any other remedy available under covenants or applicable law, may enter upon said Lot for the purpose of inspecting such utility system and if the Lot Owner refuses to make necessary repairs, the association may do so and the costs of such repairs shall be charged to the Lot Owner and collected per paragraph b. below. Not less than biennially, each Lot Owner shall provide the association evidence of an inspection and necessary pumping of such Lot Owner's ISDS. b. Owner's Negligence. In the event that any portion of the Property requires repair or replacement due to the negligent orwillful act or omission of a Owner or Occupant, then the expenses incurred by the association for such repair or replacement shall be a personal obligation of such Owner. If the Owner fails to pay the same within ten (10) days after notice is given to the Owner of the amount owed, then the failure to so repay shall be a default by the Owner and such expenses shall automatically become a default Assessment. 1 DRAINAGE PLAN FOR OVERVIEW SUBDIVISION Prepared by: Zancanella & Associates, Inc, 1005 Cooper Avenue Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 (970) 945-5700 (970) 945-1253 - fax January 26, 2005 1 e l TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE INTRODUCTION 1 MAJOR BASINS 1 OFF-SITE BASINS 1 IRRIGATION DITCHES 1 HYDROLOGY 1 ONSITE DRAINAGE 2 EROSION CONTROL 2 SUMMARY 2 FIGURE 1 Project Location Map (8 1/2" x 11") 2 SCS Soils Map w/ Drainage Basins (11" x 17") 3 Drainage Basin Map (11" x 17") 4 Drainage Plan (11" x 17") 5 NOAA Atlas 25 Year (24 hr.) Precip 6 NOAA Atlas 100 Year (24 hr.) Precip. TABLE: Hydrology Summary Table APPENDIX A: Calculations 1 INTRODUCTION The proposed Overview Subdivision is located along the northerly side of County Roads 115 approximately 4 miles easterly of the CMC campus, as shown on the Project Location Map in Figure 1. The applicant is proposing to subdivide the nearly 50 acre parcel into 3 residential Tots and a remainder parcel. The residential lots varying in size from 3.4 to 4.1 acres. MAJOR BASINS: The property is not affected by any 100 year floodplain established by FEMA. OFFSITE DRAINAGE BASINS The northwesterly fork of the Fisher Creek drainage passes near the westerly side of the proposed residential lots. This is denoted as Basin A, a basin of moderate size, and its drainage path passes through the remainder parcel. The only basin directly affecting the proposed residential parcels is the local basin that contains them. This basin is shown as Basin B on the Drainage Basins map, Figure 3. The proposed development would have no effect on Basin A, nor would Basin A affect the proposed lots. The construction of residences on the proposed residential Tots would have a slight effect on Basin B. The difference in flows was calculated based on a typical house being constructed on each lot and the use of the existing driveway to access each lot. The results are shown on the hydrology summary table, and in the calculations in the appendix. IRRIGATION DITCHES A small irrigation ditch traverses the hillside flowing from east top west across the property. The logical building sites are all located above the ditch, so the ditch should have no effect on the proposed residential Tots. There appears to be no recorded easement for this ditch, however, a reasonable prescriptive easement should be assumed. HYDROLOGY The hydrologic methods for the minor basins in this study are as outlined in the Soil Conservation Service publication "Procedures for Determining Peak Flows in Colorado" (1980). Peak flows in this area will be primarily rainfall derived since the whole site as well as most of the offsite basin are below 8000 feet in elevation. Therefore, the storm drainage system will be more than adequate to handle spring snowmelt runoff, as it typically has much lower peaks, even though of longer duration. The precipitation amounts for the 25 and 100 year, 24 hour storms were taken from the NOAA Atlas 2, Volume 4, published by the National Weather Bureau (see Figures 5 & 6). Runoff calculations for Basins A and B are included in the Appendix, and a summary table of 1 • the results is provided at the end of this text. The hydrologic characteristics were based on information from the Soil Survey of Aspen -Gypsum Area, Sheets 14 and 20. The typical Hydrologic Soil Group was "C" for Basin A, and "B" for Basin B. An average vegetative ground cover of approximately 40% of type "Oak/Aspen", results in a general Curve Number of 62 for Basin A and 58 for Basin B (undeveloped conditions). For developed conditions, an average size house footprint along with the driveway shown on the plat was used to compute an impervious and semi -impervious (gravel drives) area due to development for the three lots. This would raise the composite curve number almost one unit (to 59). Therefore, not a significant difference. ON SITE DRAINAGE On site drainage patterns are shown on Figure 4, the Drainage Plan. The estimated flows that could affect the proposed residential lots are minor and will be short lived as well as diffuse. Since the flows will be relatively shallow and diffuse, the possible damage to buildings can be mitigated with a proper site grading plan. This could be no more elaborate than a berm or berm/ditch combination on the uphill side of each building, or across the top of the whole building envelope, or by elevating the finished floor sufficiently to allow flow away from the building in all directions. Note that the existing and proposed building sites are amply spaced to allow storm runoff flows to be diverted around each site without significantly affecting adjoining sites. Detention is not proposed for this development because the relatively large lot sizes allow natural diffusion of minor flows generated from proposed lot improvements, and flows will enter the adjacent upper Fisher Creek Drainage prior to affecting any other properties. In addition, the diffuse flows would make routing of flow to detention areas difficult and the construction of channels and ponds would disturb more area and cause more erosion than warranted by any benefit gained. EROSION CONTROL In general, erosion control should consist of disturbing as little existing vegetation as possible and, therefore, minimizing reclamation. The areas that must be disturbed should be seeded with a grass mix recommended by the Soil Conservation Service. SUMMARY Impacts to proposed building areas due to on and off site runoff can be mitigated by routing flows through the site with reasonable care. Additional storm runoff generated from the development of the Overview Subdivision will be insignificant due to the large lot areas and small impervious areas in relation to the lot size. APPENDIX A: CALCULATIONS 1/24/2005 Z:\97000's\97404 Rudd, Wayne\97404.08 Overview Subdivision\Prelim Plat Submtl\Overview-Hydrology.xls OVERVIEW SUBDIVISION HYDROLOGY SUMMARY TABLE BASIN AREA CURVE NO. T/C P-25 YR Q-25 YR P-100 YR Q-100 YR (acres) (hours) (inches) (cfs) (inches) (cfs) A 460 62 0.46 2.2 22 2.6 45 B 27 58 0.1 2.2 0.7 2.6 1.5 1/24/2005 Z:\97000's\97404 Rudd, Wayne\97404.08 Overview Subdivision\Prelim Plat Submtl\Overview-Hydrology.xls APPENDIX A: CALCULATIONS Z:\97000's\97404 Rudd, Wayne\97404.08 Overview Subdivision\Prelim Plat Submtl\dwg\Prelim-Plat-Submittal-tpb.dwg, loc map, 1/4/2005 1:29:33 PM 0 CO -0 m v i 0 0 N co O 0 3D 0 N 0 0 N m m dVW NOLLV001 1031'01d NOISIAI08(1S M3IA3A0 -o 0 m 0 0 O 4, O 03 'ON 32lnO13 0 0 0 0 00 Z:\97000 s\97404 Rudd, Wayne\97404.08 Overview Subdivision\Prelim Plat Submtl\dwg\Prelim-Plat-Submittal-tpb.dwg, scs-map, 1/4/2005 1:31:41 PM z, o< 0 0 2 0 D 0 0 0 0 D m g m { � o COm D D N { c� IID 0 0 (P� 0' • O O 01 m 0 m NOISIAIO811S MBIA AC 90'WtL6 ;103rod "ON 3al9U Z:\97000 s\97404 Rudd, Wayne\97404.08 Overview Subdivision\Prelim Plat Submtl\dwg\Prelim-Plat-Submittal-tpb.dwg, drainage -quad, 1/25/2005 11:28:18 AM z o m (i) 0 z > —< a 0 73 0 0 co co 75 —I —° > .0! -o 0 0 11> r - M 0 0 0 4-> cn o" 0 0 4- 0) ._,0 0 -n cMAI NISVO ]OVNIV2:10 NOISIA10811S At\AIA0A0 90.-fr0-4L6 :i9jrodd 'ON 3231101A ;4. • e.•- ---....,„A - ;; --i's',„„ - _-„ .. , . ....--- , -1 - -4,, , .,. ; t i ' - i; A 4 /..,, ; --',, --, .4" .44 ;, „4.-. 1 - „ 0:14 .04 (1, 4 , ,....— '` 0 iii -4, 4,:,:1- t‘.-- ,/ ..„ to, • „. 34 i„.„.44;„ 31 4 , ; • 3 4 3 „ +' ', ., -- „,---',-- ; ' ” . ' — ' --• ` — ,ii: ....,,,,,, ;1" 1, ..-. - ' i ' t ,4 -„- ,. "., 33 3' 1 33 -43 ;1=1 I , —4/ 4 , 44, 4 Z:\97000's\97404 Rudd, Wavne\97404.08 Overview Subdivision\Prelim Plat Submtl\dwq\OVERVIEW SUBDIVISION -drain plan.dwq, drain, 1/25/2005 11:46:35 AM REV. NO. DATE REVISION MADE CHKD APPD BY BY BY DRAINAGE PLAN SCALE: 1000' DATE: SHEET: 15 OCT 2004 1 OF 1 DRAWN BY: TPB CHKD BY: TPB APPD BY: TAZ P DRAWING: RE PLAT SUBMTL OVERVIEW SUBDIVISION ZANCANELLA AND ASSOC/ATES, /NC. ENG/NEER/NC CONSULTANTS POST OFFICE BOX 1908 - 1005 COOPER AVENUE GLENW00D SPRINGS, COLORADO 81802 (970) 945-5700 FIGURE NO. 4 PROJECT: 97404.06 C: 12/20%2004 \Land Projects-tpn\LHyx i �\a_wg\td5-rtzLif--MAPS.d�ntg, 25Y -R-24 d.R, 12 1&24 PM 109 • 006 005 25 2g,30 30 282824 242628 3q 34 ,..73892,T, .N1 38 3 2 50 26 31 -0 34 t.28 _ 2 5 -- 25 28 — r -r\---- , ' . --.3 ) \ • N•-,„ . ; 4' 1 s, ‹t......-4-• r--..,------ -- '‘,. '•`',-,-3\-.3:-/--'\''-\;--26.7— ; •.) 6-------___T f-',-- -- -., .- ....---,-, ,,,,_ , „.-14,,,,. ',1 \ ; \„, • 'I/ - -•::- \ 3438 42 // 4)1' 82S28 20 28 33 COLORADO t 35 ; 3-40 ,4+ 4y,,, '-----,. \.• / /16?1(.7, , s, „%., , :// llI,„-•,/- ziir \ , i t \ '-- , , , / 32 5, /-_, -_____----- \----- ,, ( i ‘4;......) ,,,),-) ---- — L`-`" - - , ..„,„..../1„-_ --7., "1 ; 0 12 20 30 40 M1L3•s -F "" 42 103 zL 46 50 mr.m...w.mtmomt*,4 102 4 jt 30 2i 2544 4. 76213 34 42 434553 55 55 50 55 NOAA ATLAS 2, Vane III Prepatted by U S Department pf Corrrre,tt.e Nt1ra Oceamc and Atmospheric Admint",ctrtiorl (la tiz.trl Weather SarAct? Offtea of Hydrologi Preparad fPr U.$. Cepartment f Agricuitttre. &tal CCVISertation Servia, Erg;rtnring ttvson 109 108 106 004. Figure 31 ISOPLUVIALS OF 100 -YR 24.HR PRECIPITATION IN TENTHS OF AN INCH 10.3 .•••••. .• •-• • • .• 002 F-IGuce_g-- 5 1 • APPENDIX A: CALCULATIONS TR -55 Tabular Hydrograph Method Input Summary Description Basin A - 25 Year Flow Rainfall Distribution Type II Ia/P Interpolation off Total Area 460 ac Peak Time 12.6000 hrs Peak Flow 22.0 cfs Given Input Data: Basin A - 25 yr.txt Subarea D/S Subareas Area CN Tc Tt Rainfall Description (ac) (hrs) (hrs) (in) A 460 62 0.4600 0.0000 2.2 Support Data: Messages: Warning: Ia/p > 0.5 in row <1>. Increase CN and/or Rainfall. Ia/p = 0.5 used. • Page 1 TR -55 Tabular Hydrograph Method Input Summary Description Basin A - 100 Year Flow Rainfall Distribution Type II Ia/P Interpolation On Total Area 460 ac Peak Time 12.6000 hrs Peak Flow 45.3 cfs Given Input Data: Basin A - 100 yr.txt Subarea D/S Subareas Area CN Tc Tt Rainfall Description (ac) (hrs) (hrs) (in) A 460 62 0.4600 0.0000 2.6 Support Data: Messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 0.5000 hrs in row <1>. • Page 1 TR -55 Tabular Hydrograph Method Input Summary Description Basin B - 100 Year Flow Rainfall Distribution Type II Ia/P Interpolation On Total Area 27 ac Peak Time 12.6000 hrs Peak Flow 1.5 cfs Basin B - 100 yr.txt Given Input Data: Subarea D/S Subareas Area CN Tc Tt Rainfall Description (ac) (hrs) (hrs) (in) A 27 58 0.4600 0.0000 2.6 Support Data: Messages: Ia/p Warnin5 g: Ia/p > 0.5 in row <1>. Increase CN and/or Rainfall. • Page 1 Z:\o7nnrveko74n4 R�Ir�r�_ Wavne\97404.08 Overview Subdivision\Prelim Plat Submtl\dwq\OVERVIEW SUBDIVISION-BASE.dwq, W1A, 5/19/2005 10:49:55 AM REV. NO. DATE REVISION MADE CHKD APPD BY BY BY WATER PLAN DETAIL SCALE: 1"=50' DRAWN BY: TPB DATE: 15 APR 05 CHKD BY: TPB APPD BY: TAZ SHEET: W1 OF 2 DRAWING: BASE OVERVIEW SUBDIVISION ZANCANELLA AND ASSOC/A727, /NC. ENC/NEER/NC CONSULTANTS POST OFFICE BOX 1908 - 1005 COOPER AVENUE GLENW00D SPRINGS, COLORADO 81602 (970) 945-5700 FIGURE NO. W1A PROJECT: 97404.06 Z:\97000's\97404 Rudd, Wayne\97404.08 Overview Subdivision\Prelim Plat Submtl\dwq\OVERVIEW SUBDIVISION-BASE.dwq W1-100, 5/19/2005 10:47:26 AM N N90°00 00"W 250.34 ' S • INSTALL 3/4" FROST -FRE VI HYDRANT AT HIGH'• ` AND END F•' . OW OFF S75° 262. 7550oh r 1' WSI LOT 2 1' WS, O LOT1 EXISTING WEL • WATER TANK SEE DTLS. ON SEPARATE SHEET W2 4° s\°qi" 9�q 2% >6,-;-, N6g;58.23' DRAINAGE 3ASIN 3OUNDAY (TYP.) _ _ 7 9 31' Sym, \ 3615- N79°4 133.09 REC El VE!) MAY 2 5 2005 : r',;tt JELL') CUUNTY BUILDING & PLANNING SCALE: 1" = 100' FIGURE NO. N 1- U w O 0 a N O CD Q Z 14 W < 2 0 in 0 m m 0 0 w SII 0.- 0 CL W <m 0 cc 0 W6 P4 E S 2 2393-111-00-952 -00-032 2393-111-00-952 2787 T. 6 S. -R. 88 STATE OF COLORADO Bill Owens, Governor DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF WILDLIFE AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER Bruce McCloskey, Director 6060 Broadway Denver, Colorado 80216 Telephone: (303) 297-1192 July 11, 2005 Richard Wheeler Garfield County Planning Department 108 8th Street, Suite 201 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 RECO ilk ,JUL 1 S 2005 3UILUNG LAr�N1NG OF`' For Wildlife - For People RE: Overview Subdivision -Preliminary Plan Dear Mr. Wheeler: The Colorado Division of Wildlife staff has reviewed the request to subdivide 48.5 acres into three single family lots and one common lot along County Road 115. This area contains several important habitat areas for wildlife, including elk, mule deer, mountain lion, bears and numerous bird species. The property has been identified as big game winter range by the Division of Wildlife. Mule deer and elk use this area for resting, foraging and to move between different habitat areas. Studies have shown that habitat loss, conversion and fragmentation are the most serious issues facing wildlife. The Division of Wildlife, local residents, and wildlife are experiencing problems with dogs running at large and harassing wildlife, especially wintering deer and elk. When elk and deer have to flee from dogs, they use energy stored for winter survival. Although a dead elk/deer is not immediately seen, stress and the energy used fleeing from dogs may cause their death at the end of winter or early spring before they can get the nutrition they need. Pet owners need to be responsible and in control of their pets at all times. Civil and criminal penalties are available to the Division of Wildlife if dogs are caught harassing wildlife. We recommend that the Homeowners Association also actively encourages owners to control their pets and enact penalties for those that don't. If fencing is necessary, the Division would recommend that it be kept to a minimum and built to facilitate wildlife movements, optimize habitat availability, and reduce wildlife mortality. The Division of Wildlife has a pamphlet available "Fencing with Wildlife in Mind", which has acceptable fencing designs for wildlife and livestock. Other wildlife comments include: Black bears - although infrequent, black bears may wander into this area and we would recommended that all trash be stored in a bear -proof trash container, in a centralized locking dumpster or inside a garage so as to prevent conflicts with bears and other wildlife such as DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, Russell George, Executive Director WILDLIFE COMMISSION, Jeffrey Crawford, Chair • Tom Burke, Vice Chair • Ken Torres, Secretary Members, Robert Bray • Rick Enstrom • Philip James • Claire O'Neal • Richard Ray • Robert Shoemaker Ex Officio Members, Russell George and Don Ament • • skunks and raccoons. The Division has a list of companies providing such containers if needed. Bears and other wildlife are also attracted to pet food left outside, hummingbird feeders, BBQ's and compost piles containing food items. Mountain (ions - although rarely seen, mountain lions frequent this area. There are preventive measures that residents can take to reduce the potential for conflicts. Brochures with this information are available through the DOW and should be distributed to all residents and visitors. Lastly, if horses are allowed, we recommend storing hay and grain in a manner that minimizes conflict with the local wildlife. Since deer and elk inhabit and move through this area, haystacks should be enclosed or surrounded by an 8 foot high mesh fence. Grain should be stored in bear -proof containers. Thank you for the opportunity to provide these comments. If you need additional information, please contact DWM Kelly Wood at 963-6523. Sincerely, Pat Tucker Area Wildlife Manager Cc: DOW — J.Bredehoft, R.Velarde, K.Wood, file P.O. Box 1908 1005 Cooper Ave. Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 / ZaNCANELL4 4N0 4STOCIA TES, INC. ENGINEERING CONSULT4NT5 June 24, 2004 Mr. Mark Bean Garfield County Planning Department 108 Eighth Street, Suite 201 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 RE: Overview Subdivision Dear Mark: (970) 945-5700 (970) 945-1253 Fax This report presents the findings of the water supply investigations performed by Zancanella and Associates, Inc. for the proposed Overview Subdivision. Information contained in this report covers estimated future domestic water uses, legal water supply, well pump test, and water quality analyses. Water Requirements The new subdivision will consist of 3 lots with one dwelling unit each. We have assumed that each EQR will represent 3.5 people using 100 gallons of water per person per day. Water will be diverted to irrigate up to 10,000 square feet of lawn or other equivalent outside uses for each residence. Legal Supply As can be seen from Table 1, the subdivision will divert an average 2.66 AF annually, and consumptively use 1.37 AF. The peak month of June would require a continuous average diversion of 3.63 gpm. The subdivision is to be supplied by a shared exempt domestic well which has been drilled and tested. The Overview Well was drilled under permit number 250297 (copy attached). This is an exempt domestic permit, intended to serve a maximum of three residences and to be the only well on the 43.82 acre tract. Physical Supply The Overview Well was completed on May 21, 2003 by Shelton Drilling Corporation at a total depth of 160 feet. The well is located in the NE 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section 35, Township 6 South, Range 88 West of the 6th P.M. The location of the well can be plotted 1511 feet from the south section line and 325 feet from the east section line. The approximate location of the well and the Overview Subdivision boundary are shown on the attached general location map, Figure 1. The well was drilled through a 20 foot section of Tertiary basalt before entering the Pennsylvanian Maroon from 20 feet to the total depth of • • the well. A copy of the well construction report and a graphical representation of the well (Figure 2) are attached. A 4 hour pump test of the Overview Well was conducted on June 1, 2004 by J & M Pump Company utilizing the electric submersible pump. The pump test was performed at a rate of 15 gallons per minute (gpm). The rate was maintained at 15 gpm throughout the 4 hour test period. The drawdown and time data collected during the test are presented in Table 2. We have plotted the results of the test in a water level vs. time curve as shown on the attached Figure 3. The maximum drawdown during the 4 hour test was 0.17 feet. The water level stabilized early in the test and did not vary through the remainder of the test. Because of the relatively small amount of drawdown, no recovery data were collected. The test indicates that the well will probably be able to operate for extended periods at a rate of approximately 15 gpm. This amount, with water storage to handle peak demands, should be adequate to serve the 3 lots. It is our understanding that 10,000 gallons of shared fire and peak demand storage will be installed. Water Quality Water samples were collected during the pump test and sent to ACZ Laboratories in Steamboat Springs for independent analyses. The lab tests included analyses for various inorganic chemicals, nitrate/nitrite, total dissolved solids (TDS) and some of the physical properties of the water. A total coliform bacteria sample was collected and sent to the state lab in Grand Junction for analysis. The coliform bacteria test indicates that coliform bacteria were absent from the sample. The result from the bacteria test is attached. Results of the analyses from ACZ Labs are pending. They will be forwarded to your office as soon as they are received. If you have any questions, please call our office at (970) 945-5700. Very truly yours, Zancanella and Associates, Inc. - � 7 „ ec„.c.A Thomas A. Zancanella, P.E. Bradley C. Pe= , Geologist Attachments cc: Wayne Rudd Z:\97000's\97404 Rudd, Wayne197404.08 Overview Subdivision\Bean-WaterSupply.doc 2 Table 1 Overview Subdivision - Estimated Water Requirements Domestic Demands Domestic Demands Other Demands No. of EQR's Residential 3.0 units No. persons/residence 3.5 cap/unit No. gallons/person/day 100 gpcd Percent Consumed 15% Lawn Irrigation 10000 sq-ft/unit Application Efficiency 80% Crop Irrig reqmnt (CIR) 1.73 ft No. of EQRs for ADU s 0.0 units No. persons/unit 3.5 cap/unit No. gallons/person/day 100 gpcd Percent Consumed 15% Lawn Irrigation 1500 sq-ft/unit Application Efficiency 80% Crop Irrig reqmnt (CIR) 1.73 ft Pond Surface Area 0 acres Annual Net Evaporation 2.74 ft Irrigated Open Space 0 acres Application Efficiency 80% Crop Irrig reqmnt (CIR) 1.73 ft Water Use Calculations Diversion Requirements Consumptive Use (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) Domestic ADUs Dom\Comm Open Space Pond Average Domestic Antis Dom\Comm Open Space Pond Average Month In-house In-house Irrigation Irrigation Evap. Total Flow for Dom In-house In-house Irrigation Irrigation Evap. Total Consumption (ac -ft) (ac -ft) (ac -ft) (ac -ft) (ac -ft) (ac -ft) (gpm) (ac -ft) (ac -ft) (ac -ft) (ac -ft) (ac -ft) (ac -ft) (gpm) January 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.73 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.11 February 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.73 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.11 March 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.73 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.11 April 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.73 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.11 May 0.10 0.00 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.39 2.86 0.01 0.00 0.23 0.00 0.00 0.25 1.81 June 0.10 0.00 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.48 3.63 0.01 0.00 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.32 2.43 July 0.10 0.00 0.36 0.00 0.00 0.46 3.33 0.01 0.00 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.30 2.19 August 0.10 0.00 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.32 2.36 0.01 0.00 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.19 1.41 September 0.10 0.00 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.29 2.17 0.01 0.00 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.17 1.27 October 0.10 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.14 1.01 0.01 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.34 November 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.73 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.11 December 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.73 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.11 Annual 1.18 0.00 1.49 0.00 0.00 2.66 0.18 0.00 1.19 0.00 0.00 1.37 24 -Jun -04 Zancanella & Assoc., Inc. Water Resources Engineers Glenwood Springs, CO Jobft 97404.08\cgrusc.xls 10 1,0,3 Scale In Feet T6S T7S PROJECT LOCATION MAP SCALE: ' = 2000' DATE: MAY 10, 2004 SHEET: 1 OF DRAWN BY: BCP C11KD BY: BCP APPD BY: TAZ DRAWING: LocTopo.dwg / OVERVIEW SUBDIVISION ZANCAA/ELLA AND ASSOC/A TES, INC ENC/NEER/NO CONSUL TANTS POST OFFICE BOX 1906 - 1006 COOPER AWNUE OLEMI000 SPRINGS COL.OROCO 91002 (970) 949-5700 FIGURE NO. 1 PROJECT: 17404.08 GROUND LEVEL Tertiary Basalt Pennsylvanian Maroon formation TOTAL DEPTH 160' 0 20- 40- 60- 80- 100- 120- 140- 160- !\/ "\A CEMENT 10'-40' 0' TO 40' 9' HOLE DIAMETER -1' TO 40' 0.240 WALL 7' PLAIN STEEL CSG 40' TO 160' 6.5' HOLE DIAMETER 36' TO 120' 0.250 WALL 5.5' PVC CSG STATIC WATER LEVEL 107.0' ON JUNE 1, 2004 120' TO 160' 0.250 WALL 5,5' PVC PERF CSG OVERVIEW WELL WELL DETAIL SCALE NOT TO SCALE DRAWN BY: BCP DATE: JUNE 22. 2004 SHEET 1 OF 1 CHKD BY: BCP APPD BY: TAZ PLAN N0. WellDetail.dwg OVERVIEW SUBDIVISION ZANCANELLA ANP ASSOCIATES, INC ENGINEERING CONSUL TANTS POST OFFICE BOX 1906 - 1005 COOPER AA ME 2DIM000 SPRINGS. COLORADO 91602 (970) 945-5700 FIGURE N0. 2 PRO.ECT: 17404.08 Well ID: TABLE 2 Pump Test Data Overview Subdivision Well Job No.: 17404.08 Client: Wayne Rudd Test By: J & M Pump Analysis By: BCP M.P. = Top of Casing Q = 15 gpm r= ft S.W.L. = 107.0 ft b= ft Time/Date on: 6/1/04 8:30 AM Time/Date off: 6/1/04 12:30 PM Test Length: 4:00:00 total time TIME Time (minutes) W.L. Measurement Drawdown Q (gpm) t' (minutes) tit' (feet) (inches) (feet) 6/1/04 8:30 AM 0 107 0.0 SWL 0 6/1/04 8:31 AM 1 107 2.0 0.17 15 6/1/04 8:32 AM 2 107 2.0 0.17 15 6/1/04 8:33 AM 3 107 2.0 0.17 15 6/1/04 8:34 AM 4 107 2.0 0.17 15 6/1/04 8:35 AM 5 107 2.0 0.17 15 6/1/04 8:36 AM 6 107 2.0 0.17 15 6/1/04 8:37 AM 7 107 2.0 0.17 15 6/1/04 8:38 AM 8 107 2.0 0.17 15 6/1/04 8:39 AM 9 107 2.0 0.17 15 6/1/04 8:40 AM 10 107 2.0 0.17 15 6/1/04 8:42 AM 12 107 2.0 0.17 15 6/1/04 8:44 AM 14 107 2.0 0.17 15 6/1/04 8:46 AM 16 107 2.0 0.17 15 6/1/04 8:50 AM 20 107 2.0 0.17 15 6/1/04 8:55 AM 25 107 2.0 0.17 15 6/1/04 9:00 AM 30 107 2.0 0.17 15 6/1/04 9:10 AM 40 107 2.0 0.17 15 6/1/04 9:20 AM 50 107 2.0 0.17 15 6/1/04 9:30 AM 60 107 2.0 0.17 15 6/1/04 9:45 AM 75 107 2.0 0.17 15 6/1/04 10:00 AM 90 107 2.0 0.17 15 6/1/04 10:15 AM 105 107 2.0 0.17 15 6/1/04 10:30 AM 120 107 2.0 0.17 15 6/1/04 11:00 AM 150 107 2.0 0.17 15 6/1/04 11:30 AM 180 107 2.0 0.17 15 6/1/04 12:00 PM 210 107 2.0 0.17 15 6/1/04 12:30 PM 240 107 2.0 0.17 15 6/23/2004 Zancanella & Associates, Inc. Well Pump Test.xis 1 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 7n J 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 10 Figure 3 Pumping Test - 6/1/04 Overview Subdivision Well 10o Time (min) 1,000 10,000100 000 • • 6/3/2004 Zancanella & Associates, Inc. Well Pump Test.xls FC) = 15 gpm throughout test, p— •-- -1.7lmityF•11y Static Water Level = 107.0 ft. IPump Set at 155 ft. !Total Depth = 160 ft. • • 6/3/2004 Zancanella & Associates, Inc. Well Pump Test.xls Form No. OFFICE OF T•JTATE ENGINEER • GWS -25 APPLICANT COLORADO DI ISION OF WATER RESOURCES 818 Centennial Bldg., 1313 Sherman St., Denver, Colorado 80203 (303) 866-3581 RUDD CONSTRUCTION 0132 PARK AVE BASALT, CO 81621- 1095 WELL PERMIT NUMBER 250297 DIV. 5 WD 38 DES. BASIN MD APPROVED WELL LOCATION GARFIELD COUNTY NE 1/4 SE 1/4 Section 35 Township 6 S Range 88 W Sixth P.M. DISTANCES FROM SECTION LINES Ft. from Ft. from Section Line Section Line (970) 927-9119 PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A WELL UTM COORDINATES Northing: Easting: ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT CONFER A WATER RIGHT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1) This well shall be used in such a way as to cause no material injury to existing water rights. The issuance of this permit does not assure the applicant that no injury will occur to another vested water right or preclude another owner of a vested water right from seeking relief in a civil court action. 2) The construction of this well shall be in compliance with the Water Well Construction Rules 2 CCR 402-2, unless approval of a variance has been granted by the State Board of Examiners of Water Well Construction and Pump Installation Contractors in accordance with Rule 18. 3) Approved pursuant to CRS 37-92-602(3)(b)(II)(A) as the only well on a tract of land of 43.82 acres described as that portion of the NE 1/4 of the SE 1/4, Sec. 35, Twp. 6 South, Rng. 88 West, 6th P.M., Garfield County, more particularly described on the attached exhibit A. This well is identified as the Parcel B Well. 4) The use of ground water from this well is limited to fire protection, ordinary household purposes inside not more than three (3) single family dwellings, the irrigation of not more than one (1) acre of home gardens and lawns, and the watering of domestic animals. 5) The maximum pumping rate of this well shall not exceed 15 GPM. 6) The return flow from the use of this well must be through an individual waste water disposal system of the non -evaporative type where the water is returned to the same stream system in which the well is located. 7) This well shall be constructed not more than 200 feet from the location specified on this permit. NOTE: Parcel Identification Number (PIN): 23-2187-354-00-145 ' NOTE: Assessor Tax Schedule Number: R007347 APPROVED DMW el 41 State Engineer `Receipt No. 0509413C DATE ISSUED 05-14-2003 _ EXPIRATION DATE 05-14-2005 -�� By 4J.0 1 WELL CONSTRUCTION OD TEST REPORT STATE OF COLORADO, OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER 41103ROFFICE USE ONLY 1. WELL PERMIT NUMBER 250297 2 Owner Name(s): Rudd Construction Mailing Address: 0132 Park Ave. City, State, Zip : Basalt, Co. 81621 Phone # : 970-927-9119 APPROVAL # OWS31-91-03 WELL LOCATION AS DRILLED NE 1/4 SE 1/4 Sec: 35 Twp: 6 5 Range: 88 W DISTANCES FROM SEC. LINES 1511 ft. from South Sec. line and 325 ft. from East Sec. line OR Northing: Easting: SUBDIVISION: 29 Peaks LOT: B BLOCK: FILING (UNIT): STREET ADDRESS AT LOCATION 4 GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION ft. DRILLING METHOD Air Rotary DATE COMPLETED: 5/21/2003 TOTAL DEPTH: 160 DEPTH COMPLETION: 160 5. GEOLOGIC LOG 6. HOLE DIAMETER (in) FROM (ft) TO (ft) Depth Type of Material (Size, Color. and Type) 9.0 0 40 000-020 Volcanics 6.5 40 160 020-160 Maroon Formation 7. PLAIN CASING OD (in) Kind Wall Sipe Front (ft) To (ft) 7.0 Steel 0.240 -1 40 5.5 _ PVC 0.250 36 120 PER?. CASING : Screen Slot Size 5.5 PVC 0.250 120 160 Water Located: 120+ Remarks : 8. Filter Pack Material : Size : Interval : 9. Packer Placement Type : Depth : 10. GROUTIi IG RECORD .Material Amount 1 Density Interval Placement Cement 5 sks i 6 gal/sk 10-40 poured r 1 11. DISINFECTION : Type : HTH Amt. Used : 3 oz I2. WELL TEST DATA : () Check Box If Test Data Is Submitted On Supplemental TESTING METHOD : Air Compressor • Static Level : 105 ft. Date/Time Measured 5/21/2003 Production Rate 15 gpm Pumping Level : Total ft. Date/Time Measured 5/21/2003 Test Length : 2 hours Test Remarks : 13 I have read the statcmcnts made herein and latow tha cootenta thereof, and Ihat+hey ate true to my knowledge. (Pursuant to Section 24-4-1.4 (13)(a) CRS, the mxkias of fame statemeno . constitutes perjtuy m rhe second dtg�ea and la punishable as a class 1 misdemeanor.) CONTRACTOR : Sh®lton Drilling Corp. Phone : (970) 927-4182 Mailing Address : P.O. Box 1059 Basalt, Co. 81621 Lic. No. 1095 Name / Title (Please Type or Print) Wayne Shelton / President Signature Date 6lz6/Zoog Calends Dammam ofand Ex/tummy:etc li'61i� field, LABORATORY & RADIATION SERVICES 8100 LOWRY BOULEVARD DENVER, CO 80230-6928 US MAIL PO BOX 17123 DENVER, CO 80217 WATE R BACTERIOLOGY -oLe_ b,iie4 SAMPLE INFORMATION: 0 COMMUNITY 0 NON -COMMUNITY 'PRIVATE ❑ ROUTINE SIZAW 0 REPEAT FOR THE MONTH OF 'SPECIAL PURPOSE 0 FINISHED PWS ID lean %D✓ceO EL) NAM F SYSTEM CHLORINE R SIDUAL C� od, y &cr16 its',-��G ADDRESS CITY OUNTY ORDERED BY: (SAMPLE MAY NOT BE TESTED IF ALL INFORMATION IS NOT PROVIDED) (97) ) 91-74.5--570-o PHONE FEE STAMP LAB 106 (07/97) .0 27, C,4„.. u,4 1'c- 5 c c, - NAME /00s bei A�,e 4/6 MG/L COLLECTED RECEIVED /DATE TIME 2. �}� BY /4//051 r/� R: PM / / ❑ AM ❑ PM ADDRESS CITY / STATE r ZIP TEST ORDERED (STD SACT. ❑ OTHER RESULTS: SEE REVERSE FOR ON TOTAL COLIFORM 0 PRESENT ABSENT MOST PROBABLE NO. COLIFORM/t00ML 0 DENVER ❑ DURANG,O ANALYST GRD. JCT. • • Description of Vegetation: The upper basin area (Basin A, Soil #19) has an overstorey of Aspen trees, with density increasing with elevation. In the lower elevations Gambel oak replaces the aspens. Typical shrubs include serviceberry and mountain mahogany. Grasses are typically bromegrass and wheatgrass. The central portion of Basin A has an overstorey of mainly Gambel oak, shrubs of mountain mahogany and serviceberry, and bromegrass beneath. The lower portion of Basin A as well as the subdivision itself has scattered Gambel oak, with more dense mountain mahogany, bitterbrush, big sage, and serviceberry shrubs. The grasses include ricegrass, junegrass, as well as needle and thread. 02/'24/2005 12:28 9709471078 GARFIELD CNTY CLERK PAGE 01 • • Garfield County IT Department GIS Resources: Colorado Division of Wildlife WRIS Data Checklist for: Rom P* ey kJ4--/AZ IZ'OO a/&7-. 5-4/ -CO-ism' Rob Hykys, GIS An'lyst., Rlykys©godroldrounty.eam 970-945-1377 x1590, FAX 970.3B4.2e70 2/24/200511;11;13 AM Note: For additional information and interpretation of this data, contact Pam Schnurr, ildlife Biologist, Colorado Division of Wildlife, Grand Junction, at 970-297-1192, Species & Habitat Type: Bald Eagle Active Nest Site Bald Eagle Communal Roost Bald Eagle Roost Site Bald Eagle Winter Range Bald Eagle Winter Concentration Area Bald Eagle Winter Foraging Area Black Bear Overall Range Black Bear Fall Concentration Area Black Bear Summer Concentration Area Black Bear -Human Conflict Brazilian Free -Tailed Bat Overall Range Bighorn Overall Range Bighorn Winter Range Bighorn Winter Concentration Area Bighorn Summer Range Bighorn Production Area Canada Goose Brood Concentration Area Canada Goose Feeding Area Canada Goose Production Area Canada Goose Wnter Range Canada Goose Winter Concentration Area Elk Winter Range Elk Winter Concentration Area Elk Severe Winter Range EIk Overall Range EIk Summer Range EIk Summer Concentration Area EIk Production Area EIk Highway Crossing EIk Limited Use Area Great Blue Heron Nesting Area Great Blue Heron Foraging Area Lynx Overall Range Lynx Potential Habitat Mule Deer Winter Range Mule Deer Winter Concentration Area Mule Deer Severe Winter Range Mule Deer Overall Range Mule Deer Summer Range Mule Deer Resident Population Mule Deer Highway Crossing Osprey Active Nest Site This property Iles: Entirely Partially Within Out In Area in Area 1 Mile of Area .4G 7.7 02124/2005 12:28 9709471078 GAR)-1ELD GN I Y LLEKK F AC5E U2 1 • Osprey Foraging Area Peregrine Falcon Nesting Area Peregrine Falcon Potential Nesting Area Pronghorn Antelope Overall Range Pronghorn Antelope Winter Range Pronghorn Antelope Winter Concentration Area Razorback Sucker River Otter Overall Range Sage Grouse Brood Area Sage Grouse Overall Range Sage Grouse Production Area Sage Grouse Winter Area Sage Grouse Historic Habitat Wild Turkey Overall Range Wild Turkey Production Area Wild Turkey Winter Range Wild Turkey Winter Concentration Area Wild Turkey Roosting Sites M\ 1i 1 \k k k\ H\kk Z:\97000's\97404 Rudd, Wayne\97404.08 Overview Subdivision\Prelim Plat Submtl\dwq\OVERVIEW SUBDIVISION-BASE.dwq, RD P&P, 5/2/2005 9:45:13 AM + 0 tv O 0 7531.97 7533.5 7533.9 7533.97 7532.6 7530.5 7531.32 7529.4 0 4 3 O c. --", O Oco O O 'ZI Co tv + 0 7529.1 0 7530.13 7529.1 7529.0 0 44. + 0 0 + O 7530.38 7530.2 7532.3 7532,79 7534.8 7537.3 U1 0 0) + 0 O 0) + 0 7537.36 7539.8 7542.1 7541.93 7544.3 7546.0 7546.50 7547.2 7548.3 0 '578.615 to o co S02°58 '44" W 719.19' °s OA r- � N , w 7548,17 7548.8 7548.6 7548.50 7548.1 7547.5 7.%0 RECEIVED MAY 0 2 2005 GARFIELb COUNTY BUILDING & PLANNING REV. NO. DATE REVISION MADE BY CHKD BY APPD 8Y \\ P NO2°58' 'E \\\ 657.66 3 ACCESS ROAD PLAN & PROFILE SCALE: 1"=50' DATE: SHEET: 12 APR 2005 1 OF 1 DRAWN BY: TPB CHKD BY: TPB APPD BY: TAZ DRAWING: BASE S02°58'44" Ni 529.37' \ COz vCf) 0> OVERVIEW SUBDIVISION ZANCANELLA AND ASSOC/A TES, /NC. ENG/NEER/NO CONSUL TANTS POST OFFICE BOX 1908 - 1005 COOPER AVENUE PROJECT: 97404.06 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81802 (970) 945-5700 FIGURE NO. C 1 • Z:\97OOO's\97404 Rudd, Wayne\97404.08 Overview Subdivision\Prelim Plat Submtl\dwg\tank-dtl.dwg, W2, 5/2/2005 9:22:32 AM FIRE PROTECTION SYSTE STANDARD DRY HYDRANT GQm. onents APPLIED ENGINEERING A Optional manway with pa eth iorre extersian to grade B Bolted steal cover with gasket C 4" lockable level inspection port D Combination PVC vent 1 refill. 25 NST4 swv& plug E Dry hydrant head with dust cap, 6" NST-tvtate F S" pipe coupling rnok#cd into tank sped; for drew pipe G 6" draw pipe with vertex breaker at foot H Weep tuba to maintain proper air space 4" coin pmcvrs Idling with Packebt; cap Notes Refill through combination Neta or dry hydrant with 2.5" hose adapt r (50 P 1 mr 2 i3 /or $ ft, diameter tank - 13 vortical lest to hydrant head 3 M iw y access is not required f optional accessory 4 Order check vafvw in weep tube `rf• for potable water applications Mix yr combine accessories to meet your specific department requirer 6 USE Mier fabric 9aotexiile between grove/ end soil cover 7 installation must lottowA.E,& S, 'installation HanefbnaX' t'jgecrlptlro of flea department applJcetiona DETAIL PROVIDED BY FIRE DEPARTMENT FIRE SUCTION PIPE TANK ACCESS MANHOLE 2" TANK FITTING FOR WATER SUPPLY FROM WELL EXIST. WELL DA1E NEL SCH. 40 PVC ONE 7,000 GAL. FIBERGLASS WATER STORAGE TANK (BURIED) DEMON DIADEMS= MY !Y MY 4" TANK FITTING FOR WATER SUPPLY TO LOTS 6" TANK FITTING FOR 35 GPM SUBMERSIBLE PUMP CONTROLLED BY VFD FOR PRESSURE REGULATION TO CONSTANT 50 PSI 6" TANK FITTING \_____________________ FOR LEVEL CONTROLS FOR WELL PUMP 2" SCH. 80 PVC WATER PLAN DETAILS SCALE: NOT TO SCALE DATE: 15 APR 05 DRAWN BY: TPB CHKD BY: TPB APPD BY: TAZ SHEET: W2 OF 2 DRAWING: BASE 2" DRAIN TO DAYLIGHT (IF POSSIBLE) OVERVIEW SUBDIVISION ZANCANELLA AND ASSOC/A TES, /NC. ENG/NEER/NG CONSUL TANTS POST OFFICE BOX 1908 - 1005 COOPER AVENUE GLENW00D SPRINGS, COLORADO 81602 (970) 945-5700 FIGURE NO. W2 PROJECT: 97404.06 Z:\97000's\97404 Rudd, Wavne\97404.08 Overview Subdivision\Prelim Plat Submtl\dwq\OVERVIEW SUBDIVISION-BASE.dwq, drain, 5/2/2005 9:32:34 AM REV. NO. DATE REVISION MADE CHKD BY BY APPD BY DRAINAGE PLAN SCALE: = 1000' DRAWN BY: TPB DATE: SHEET: 15 OCT 2004 1 OF 1 CHKD BY: APPD BY: DRAWING: TPB TAZ PRE PLAT SUBM OVERVIEW SUBDIVISION ZANCANELLA AND ASSOC/ATFS, INC ENC/NEER/NC CONSULTANTS POST OFFICE BOX 1908 - 1005 COOPER AVENUE GLENW00D SPRINGS, COLORADO 81602 (970) 945-5700 FIGURE NO. 4 PROJECT: 97404.06 P.O. Box 1908 1005 Cooper Ave. Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 Z4VIC4NELL4 4141) 455O04TES, INC. ENGINEERNNG CONSULT4NTS Mr. Roland Parker Rudd Construction 0132 Park Avenue Basalt, CO 81621 Re: Overview Subdivision Dear Roland: January 19, 2006 (970) 945-5700 (970) 945-1253 Fax Attached are copies of the water quality samples taken at Overview Subdivision in November. The bacteria sample came back absent for total coliforms. The nitrate/nitrite sample result is 0.61 which is below the maximum contaminant level. These results should be forward to Garfield County. If you have any questions, please call our office at (970) 945-5700. Very truly yours, Zancanella & Associates, Inc. Thomas A. Zancanella, P.E. Attachments z:\97000's\97404 rudd, wayne\97404.08 overview subdivision\parker-water quality.doc Wo,- do Dtputmtnt Public'llitult t and Emir nntent •Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Compliance Assurance & Data Management Unit REPORTING FORM FOR NITRATE OR NITRITE AS NITROGEN ANALYSES SAMPLER: FILL OUT ONE FORM FOR EACH SAMPLE Are these results to be used to fulfill compliance montioring requirements YES[ NOn Is this a check or confirmation sample? YES❑ NOn PWSID: COUNTY: Garfield DATE COLLECTED: 11/28/2005 SYSTEM/ESTABLISHMENT NAME: Overview Subdivision, CIO Zancanella & Assts. SYSTEM MAILING ADDRESS: 1005 Cooper Ave. Glenwood Springs CO 81601 Street address/PO Box City State Zip CONTACT PERSON: Brad Peek PHONE: (970) 945-5700 SAMPLE COLLECTED BY: Wayne Rudd TIME COLLECTED: 11:00 am ENTRY POINT (Finished Water) SAMPLED SOURCE WATER SAMPLE n FOR ENTRY POINT SAMPLE PLEASE INDICATE: Chlorinated X Other Treatment LI Finished - Not Treated (No chlorine or other treatment) �X OTHER DESCRIPTION: STATE ENTRY POINT CODE: EP SOURCE(S) REPRESENTED: Well Head DO SAMPLES NEED TO BE COMPOSITED BY THE LABORATORY? YES NOEX CHECK OR CONFIRMATION SAMPLES CANNOT BE COMPOSITED For Laboratory Use Only Below This Line LABORATORY SAMPLE #: 05-8797-01 CLIENT NAME or ID #: OVERVIEW SUB LABORATORY NAME: Evergreen Analytical Laboratory DATE RECEIVED IN LABORATORY: 11/29/05 LAB PHONE: (303) 425-6021 DATE ANALYZED: 11/29/2005 11:11 AM COMMENTS: PARAMETER RESULT in (mg/L) MCL in (mg/L) STANDARD METHOD LAB MDL in (mg/L) NITRATE -N 0.61 10.0 E300 0.056 NITRITE -N BDL 1.0 E300 0.076 NITRATE+NITRITE-N 0.61 10.0 E300 0.076 BDL = Indicates that the copund was analyzed for, but was below the Lab MDL. NT = Not Tested for Compound. mg/L = Milligrams per Liter. Reviewed & Approved by VIA MCL = Maximum Contamin nt Level. H = Holding time has been exceeded. Lab MDL = Laboratory Method Detection Limit. Technical Director Title /Date MAIL RESULTS TO: CDPHE, WQCD-CADM-B2, 4300 Cherry Creek Drive South, Denver, CO 80246-1530 o Laboratory Services Division 8100 Lowry Boulevard ver CO 80230-6928 US Mail: PO Box 171231,enver CO 80217 coloradoDepartment (303) 692-3090 fax (303) 344-9989 of Public Health and Environment • Lab ID No. MSA -2005003683 SAMPLE SITE SAMPLE INFORMATION Overview Subdivision Well Head County Road 115 Collected Received Reported Collected By 11/28/2005 11:00:00/ 11/29/2005 8:29:29AM 11/30/2005 Matrix Drinking Water CUSTOMER COMMENTS Zancanella & Associates 1011 Grand Ave Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Contact Name Contact Phone Purpose Special Purpose Chlorine residual Payment Type Billed Test Name Result Method Name Escherichia coli PA Total coliforms PA E. coli not detected Coliform absent or less than one (<1), indicates a microbiologically safe sample SM 9223 LARS Interent Address: http://www.cdphe.state.co.us/Ir/lrhom.htm Modification Date:11/30/2005 #203