Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSoils Report 09.26.2016U* -49-- 90119 Moot, f (# 1 Huddleston -Berry Engineering & Testing. LLC Tally Ho Construction 0145 County Road 225 Rifle, Colorado 81650 Attention: Jeff Parrington Subject: Alternative Foundation Recommendations Lot 4 Creek Side Estates Rifle, Colorado 640 White Avenue Grand Junction, Colorado 8I50i Phone: 970-255-8005 fax: 970-255-6818 Info a huddlestonberry.com September 26, 2016 Project#01150-0003 Reference: Geotechnical Investigation, Lois 3 and -1, Creek Side Estates, Garfield County, Colorado by Yeh and Associates, Inc. for Empty Enterprises, LLC, May 18, 2007. Dear Mr. Parrington, At your request, Huddleston -Berry Engineering & Testing, LLC (HBET) prepared this letter regarding Lot 4 of the Creek Side Estates subdivision in Rifle, Colorado. The proposed construction at the site is anticipated to consist of a single-family residence. Based upon information provided to HBET, the structural engineer is having difficulty meeting the foundation design requirements outlined in the referenced report. The purpose of this letter is to outline alternative foundation recommendations for the proposed construction. Subsurface Conditions The referenced report indicates that the soils at the site consist of medium stiff to stiff, slightly sandy, silty clay and medium stiff, slightly sandy silt. Groundwater was encountered at a depth of 14.5 feet on Lot 4 at the time of the investigation. The native clay soils were indicated to be slightly plastic and to range from slightly collapsible to moderately expansive. The native silt soils were indicated to be non -plastic and slightly col lapsible. Foundation Recommendations The referenced report recommended spread footing foundations above undisturbed native soils. In addition, the report recommended that foundations be designed for an allowable bearing capacity of 3,000 psf and minimum dead -load pressure of 1,000 psf. Lot 4 Creek Side #OI150-0003 09/26/16 Huddleston -Berry Based upon information provided to HBET, the structural engineer is having difficulty achieving the minimum dead -load pressure. As an alternative to the high dead -load pressure, HBET recommends that spread footing foundations be constructed above a minimum of 30 -inches of structural fill. Due to their potential for expansion, the native clay soils are not suitable for reuse as structural fill. Imported structural fill should consist of a granular, non -expansive, non -free draining material such as pit -run, crusher fines, or CDOT Class 6 base course. However, if pit -run is used for structural fill, a minimum of six inches of crusher fines or Class 6 base course should be placed on top of the pit run to prevent large point stresses on the bottoms of the footings due to large particles in the pit -run. Prior to placement of structural fill, it is recommended that the bottom of the foundation excavation be scarified to a depth of 6 to 8 inches, moisture conditioned, and compacted to a minimum of 95% of the standard Proctor maximum dry density, within ± 2% of the optimum moisture content as determined in accordance with ASTM D698. Structural fill should extend laterally beyond the edges of the foundation a distance equal to the thickness of structural fill. Structural fill should be moisture conditioned, placed in maximum 8 -inch loose lifts, and compacted to a minimum of 95% of the standard Proctor maximum dry density for fine grained soils and 90% of the modified Proctor maximum dry density for coarse grained soils, within ± 2% of the optimum moisture content as determined in accordance with ASTM D698 and D1557C, respectively In general, HBET believes that the allowable bearing capacity recommended in the referenced report is too high and may result in differential settlements. As a result allowable bearing capacity of 2.000 psf for construction at this site. Footings subject to frost should be at least 36 inches below the finished grade. IBET recommends an Non -Structural Floor Slab and Exterior Flatwork Recommendations In order to limit the potential for excessive differential movements of slabs -on -grade it is recommended that non-structural floor slabs be constructed above a minimum of 18 -inches of structural fill with subgrade preparation and fill placement in accordance with the Foundation Recommendations section of this report. It is recommended that exterior flatwork be constructed above the native soils, below the topsoil, that have been scarified to a depth of I2 -inches, moisture conditioned, and compacted to a minimum of 95% of the standard Proctor maximum dry density, within 2% of the optimum moisture content as determined in accordance with ASTM D698. General Notes The recommendations included above are based upon the information in the referenced report and on our local experience. These conclusions and recommendations are valid only for the proposed construction. Specific items not outlined in this document as part of the construction should be in accordance with the recommendations in the referenced report. ' 204114 ,ALL PROIECTS,01150-Tally Ila Consirucrmn.01130.0003 Lai 3 Creeksrde'200 • Cxo'01150-0003 LR0926I6 dac SOIL COMPACTION TEST REPORT structural fill Dale: 10/10/16 fin Date: 10/10/16 U 01150 - 0003 0 z .` 0. Lot 4 Creekside Estates E a. O u a C O U 0 2 Client Name: 0 0 C G0 0 L 0. 0 u 2 C 0 U Remarks Deflection / Pumping Noted % i .7- IA >- ?- - >- >-' )- u e. `. 6 C+ a n CJ C` C O O O+ C+ a .s E. Y i e u - 4 V'1 T +D Oc E, Lda 0 O 0 0 N. 0 f`1 0 0 +G 0 E C. 6 - Z 0 ® . to — O N _ O hN _ O _ O t- _ O t•- _ Max. Dry Density (pelt 'n ' coca. tr. +n in \O 0 in +a O Vn a 0 +n +.6 0 4 1 . _ • e w t. O f s1 0 CIi O ri O N O N 0 n1 Test Location / Observation Arca north garage footing wept «arage footing basement pad, south section basement pad, west section basement pad, north section basement pad, east section -- tV NI -! V7 +O O u G E O 0 E 2 i O O E 0 E. 0 0 E C E 0 0 C u 0. .L 0 Moisture Counts: 152 Density Counts: 1340 7 N 00 0 a 7 0 0 V