HomeMy WebLinkAbout1.0 ApplicationI FLYTNG FlsH RANqH
Special Use Permit APPIication
I Prepared by: Joseph Edward & Associates
Box 3554
Aspen, CO. 81612
(e70) 920 2339
I
I
T
T
I
I
I
970-946-77a5 P.Ol
oct-?6-98 O933gA Stclla ArchulotaI Anucl\rloNr wtu*w
3l
4l
5l
6l
I
I
I
I
I
t
I
I
t
T
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
?nDi*istt */</Kr - siaofProPcrtv: b'b1b L brxq
Apprhlio!acquirtacru.thraitamrnrutbanrhn.itt-tuiff.tlrcmlicdirn
GANHELD COI'NTY PIAI{!{ING DEPASI}IENT
lOt EtE St'G'$Stfft 3O3
Ghtood SPriryl CO tl50f
Tdcphe: g7O.fS.eZt2 frcrimitq 970'94''77t5
6,
SubmiurlDas BarcFoc: rtoqv 2 = -8@
Pbr d spociEcarir fu lb plupocod ur iadrdinf ec hflrs- qf oecradm' tho rnourt of vrchiclcc
acwi4 fu dE * ",L1v,
irlrvanilor r"mfu"rs, rld ths tirc of,rry orirtbg or ProPcGd
fircnnts bt 1l;ill bG otfiia U ofo,*t* \r,ft [o pg,qo66d usp' Plp1sc sbmit this i&Errgti6
in nrrretivc frrm sdbG tPGGffic'
If ;ur will bc using $,&,ot *ilf bo Ultti4g rrasrmtcf in coqiun'tio widt tbc propd ur' plcasc
d'rrit rhp 8,ncrr[ "f *; e,t r*rld Uo LcA ua ao trfc oir,re*.,ru0t trccE,t If pr wiu bG
utitizing wrll ur&, pf."t rEl.t
"
oopy of tb rppiQrbr urdl PfiItit rod ary oecr kgd wlrcr
supply i6rnrtiotr, i"a*Oiry
"
t*"r ilo|rucd ciltrtst or ls ryPrwGd t{Etlr sUgmffiti6 Plrn'
Aapdrarmo*atoertrcyi,ry},u"psoPc4y,rlllrlrctlllsotbcpoperty'a'd6cco'dyorSutc-*&W
*i6in orc (i) mih of yun Fopctty. If )o1r arc proPosiq3 E Ew q erpiDdcd acaas 6to
;c-rr*y or Stare *i6*V, rub-mit a drivavay or highray_ace*-prmit'
n *ir,ny r-p, shoring dryc of Varrprqaty, fo. *li"U i U-S-O.S. I:24'000 scalo +udraogh mrp
will su6co.
i}]|q6,fu approrrb pordcr deCerfiddcody Afqor's lYlep rhmving all Fblic and prlrtc
landoumcn eAiaecot Jyirr Pt ettty. Ioohdc a li* of ell Pqctty o*Etl end trcir addrccrcs'
Ar5.5 a cry dbc &0i ; -"
d"f .t*tp"* of tbc prqsty. 11 y.', erc rctury 8t rn 8gctrt for tc
propcrty orumc3r )lgu m$t dtt"h rn acftnouiloagtca; run tto plqcrty ow6r tat yot mry 13t in
UIJH bchstf.
For atl applicatior pcrtdrhg b airyortr' 6G oil rd grr rDdlstry, potrcf ry*Td* aillor
transmiscion i,atttti, oiury-oErcr "it*iful in&rstri8l opcraioo' )ru orry $-ro11T itp"'t
$eEn.nrtsrsiffi *il e.;q,rit*tt of Scctiong 5.03, peragnphr I drru 31 5'03'07' inclurivc:
and5.O3.Ot, ioclruiw.
Thc cosi4oratin "f
nri;rop*.d spGcid ur will rcquirr at lcart or (l) public hriq& frr u&ic'h prblk:
nmicc tmtt bGpro'ri46" rL pr-ii"g pqerunat tiitt *st yo infsnnairm omemlrg thir hclritr8(s)'
approxinnrly fO rb,, pior 1oG r*.arbd badng. You will Ust to Equircd to nodfy, by ati6od rtAra
rceipt 'ril all drr;Ahrd",nr.tt aad Pubftdthc ndice gtovidrd W ib Phnni4g Dcparuncot' ia a
;;;*il,*ofgongrel cirsthtiorr. Bdtblo noticc nurrtbc.aifar!"Utitma at h.tt t5 d4a priortolhe
pubtic tnaring T[3 .BPti*S .t lt b*t fuc6t d msili$g uA prtticatim and prof of rmilirg and
pubtio",i- nr,rct b nructirco $thc timc of tho public hc.ting.
Thc itrrnatioo o@incd wirhin this applkxio fu cunplac od corroct, to ttc bc$ of my lnorlcdgp:
*,^,-,y,ffil
I
T
I
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t
I
t
I
t
I
I
I
I
List of ltems
1. VicinitY MaP
r 2. il*;i of Existing site (with 100 yr. Flood Plain Designations)
I 3. ProPosed Site Plan
4. Floor plans and Exterior Elevations of Proposed Development
I : B:[S":iio o,* Accessory Structure
I 5. Tax Assessor's MaP
I 6. List of Adjacent Property Owners
7. Soils Report
t 3 fi,?l'B:'Hl"m
Design
10. Corps of Engineers Letter of Approval
I Re: Section 404 the FederalWater Pollution ControlAct
I Amendments of 1972,33 U'S'C' 1344
11. CoPY of Deed
I 12. Letter of AgencY from Owner
I
I
I
T
I
I
I
I
t
I
I
t
I
I
t
I
I
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
T
I
W
(] lnterstate Route I u. s. Route QState Route
Item # 1
'r64
E:
ts
<l!00.<ooq
t
n\..,\ I \t I) t\ (Li;.1 i u
kY'' .r
\ ).--1
a9"22'30"
31I
11 lrllLE
I
a rNiairoF GCoLoGrc^! sunvEY FEsroN vriGrirA rtl6 1o7"oz'30'
ROAD CLASSIFICATION
Primary highway,Light-duty road, hard or
hard surface imProved surface
Secondary highway,
hard surface Unimproved road.. =========
ao
'€9.-
o.o.-
Dc\. t.c$ ?ui-l
s/rcfttI
J,,
I
I
I
Revisions shown in purple compiled from aerial photographs
taken 1983 and other source data. Partial field check
by U. S. Forest Service. Map edited 1987
c.T*h,tt$, colo
39t07-D2-1F-024
1961
PHOTOREVISED 1987
DMA 45S2 I NW_SERIES V877
QUADRANGLE LOCATION
qtl1)WX
.F.OTETTY
$63
1.7
T.8
IIIII-IIIIIIIIIIIII
r'-N<
3$
>T
d*!*
'$oa
1$T$
,|fi ii
^\=o
3It
(^,
i
I
*
I
i
lril
f'\-. s L
ili '8t".', 8E -
F-,' '"(5r ./l'r';il*:,
iJ.V"Fil*),
ffi$/.\ ''b
S$$'
,/$' ,t.. .- 9b e"E f
$I$w:
(+
$ \\
X'rl* 'lt$i/
*A
r ))r7
t_
c\c
Ettl
4
\\ \-:
I
I
I
,j
"J
l
l
l
I
IJ
l
l
l
l
l:l^t
l
l
l
I
l
l
I
\--7\!3 /
*\\oob
N
n
1
-t
,**?""*D;rS
F
Item # 4
t
T
I
lr
lr
lr
lr
lr
lr
lr
lr
lr
lr
lr
h
u
lr
lr
Main House
)
\i\
)
I
I
)
5
J
,ffi4--1li
ll,:- -.._ 11,l ,^
- - tgo'r-'.._l"yrlt
_-J
t. i -4-^lr_ /\^u
@t ml
FffiEM
a.
:[o.r$\
rrl
T]
l
q
?
B7
d
$
ig
sl
f_
71
4
-p
$o(\
dl
t
7o
a
utt-
TZ!
@1 EJ
_{)
lrt
f;
$
$
F
I
-L
iE
l-- -
+
)
ff
J-
fl1
s-t\
9:J
!e
-0-.scP0 I
''-11
+l
I+-1
I1t
---tlt
I
rl
*1tr
i,li r -I
*i lrfl
i-i
'uJI
I
I
I
I
I+-*
llrll ll'll
1o
vi
ft
s:03
ffi\,
s
+
;l
a
$ql
(\
t/\r
)(l
1.
h:s
iEa
t: 'n-si
(
,1^,
i'
i.r
$.J
IC
C
-1J
Efi
<
)
,i
I
',:
;i
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Item # 4
t
I
t
I
t
I
T
I
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Garage and A.D.IJ.
\
r - -:-------T
tltfil-
\1I
I
T
t
I
li
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
T
T
-ffi&ACE*A.DL{''Ftrc,I c Ap.q. TorAL--qa;rc * \197!qE
I
I
Itl I--+a,
-_+f--L______ ___+
&
I
I
T
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t
I
tlrJ- --_-l---- --I
8.uAlO Jl P6-r96
-3j446 - 3'0>,11
'-1 ,10 ,19
,pe,ffii pwnr<p t ffila-@ fu:txa ftan Ffnr,n
-('o.frI
'+7
A
OL
frr
dII?
,
:
i
.o\
cl
,I
I
:l
rl
L)
o1r
$
k
II}
;
\D
v
\D
(
E,v?
(i
c:8.
tli.Y
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
c)f
d
l
Tu
L
$.
It
E-
IL
oL
Ed
cPs-I
JIt
$<.
{f
N(
_f
7Nu)
e
UJ\rL\;)
ll
:
I
=I-6\o,
t
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
t
I
I
I
I
I
t
T
I
I
I
$
r$s
I
Ur
|r
t:
zjl6
HI
HE
;lol
ffir
Item # 4
I
T
I
I
lr
lr
lr
lr
lr
lr
ll
t:
lr
lr
ll
Accessory Structure
oos-f-
$s
{{il
f.cc
sL\;
il
;'8
I
lF
P3
s
ic
$-llslr
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
{l
8I
dt
EI:l
0l
$l
FI
>l
$l
L)!,
vo6J
h
*NoT
\l)
{
i
-
i-;
!
{: -':/- ;l-,/'i -/4..// -r
I ' -l-/
L/
/,' ,/t;'/l'/Y,. ///. . ^ ,/r{,
\)i.\\
\\xx\
r$\\.\\'\ \
i\-\/- \\z'Y\." :\
'x
r',1L,//
(.",:
\..\\\\r "\\'t 1,;\
"-\
I
I
I
I
I
I
t
t
l_;
l':;-
\yI
t
T
t
I
T
I
I
I
\
"\"\lr\
//,/
,.6
((j-
-r"
-;\\.-n, ,\
\v \\\\ !\\-*; .\\
q -\\:\\..
!\\
-t*'r.
\
t'a
'-t.,
".,//A'
:.;ri;'//-lar-,
/// I'z-t't ,ri-'
.v*-v
v
I
E;\l-
)r/fu
oro
:
s
L
s_
J.
E
oTIrL
IlvtIUlol\F
l{.
l+.
lp
t{lolil
l$
T
5
0_-
Hg
>t
HIsl2sll
l&l
0
(
:J
HtoI
d],d
U
5
g
o3
6b
P
g
I
I
T
I
I
I
lr
lr
lr
lr
lr
lr
lr
lr
lr
l:
l:
,+,?
(,
to-H---
.li
I +d
't .r
oo.|.fs(f\iQo_ -t
5L
bL
tt[.tr
o
E,
xtr
o
.rr\.rl
s
t--
e{t
a
E$I1
$lto
(
$
;
6
:J
bdotoItqt
;o
3
I
), J
I
l\_
l;.
J
I'r
I '-
l'.,
T
.. \,//.)
s4
9€l<'
ur -=
s)l
*H
*i-
-i f
4'*-li
I
I
I
I
l(
l',-
I
I
I
I
I
I
t
I
I
I
I
T
I
)
rOtrq-9
R$
-\ ir
+i
TsIL
oT
Fcr
I
J':o
s
rt)
<.+
A
d-+
s
F
ul
d,\o1
;otr
5
,i---*-,--- *rn -*) A,
)
)
I
I
l,
I
'I ,'*
l]
I
T
I'
t
I
I
t
T
I
I
I
t
I
{
,./4-.
'-1
ro(rlq:lssl,-| -i<.til2
td
IrltrloIE
tF
l,I\tl'\)lo
rI
',t
't
B
$
$
.io
-t
l.
s$
'u)
aL
E
$
u
\
A
H
B
f,,$
{o
0
to
tr.,d
rd
-)ul
Li
.il
J
Ll
I
I
t-
,..1
.i l, ?,i.'
^_e
Item # 5
l@
Ilo
SCHULT,
,BDIWSIC
7.15 AC.\iVTtla-rb)rrr-ffiorenrr
I <eup
lfr
Ir
lr
lr
l:
Ir
t,
@
T
I
T
T
Lg,l - 3U- oo' otl (t"'=^)
List of Adiacent ProPertY Ownerc
Item # 6
I Parcer #2ss1321 00 028 il?'l?;ft fiJr"ff# Faber
Carbondale, CO. 81623
I parcer #2ss1321 oo o2e lif?ffii! LiltL.
I Carbondale' CO' 81623
Parcel #2391 321 0o 041 Frederic A. & Francis Davies
I L?"i:;5i+ffi brtera-rt A
I parcer #2ss1 s21 oo o4z i?r?ifiro#If;;f* kcn A . D.r Ea-
Carbondale, CO' 81623
lA
t
TB
I
I
I
t
I
I
I
Bureau of Land Management
P.O. Box 1009
Glenwood SPrings, CO. 81601
Tom Newland
Roaring Fork Railroad Holding Authority
P.O. Box 1270
Carbondale, CO. 81623
I
I
It
lr
lr
lr
lr
l:
l:
HgpwonrH-Pewrer GrotucHltceL, INc'5020 Road 15tl
Glenwood SPrings, CO 81601
Fax 970 945-8{5{
Phone 970 945-7988
SI.]BSOIL STI.JDY
FOR FOI]NDATION DESIGN
PROPOSED ADDITIONS, GARAGE, AND ACCESSORY STRUCTURE
FISH RESIDENCE, O2O4 FLYING FISH ROAD
GARFIELD COLINTY, COLORADO
JOB NO. 198 578
SEPTEMBER 1.6, 1998
PREPARED FOR:
JOHN FISH
C/O JOSEPH EDWARD
P.O. BOX 3s54
ASPEN, COLORADO 81612
Item # 7
I
I
I
lr
lr
lr
lr
l:
l:
l:
t:
HEPWORTH . PAWLAK GEOTECHMCAL, INC.
September 16, 1998
John Fish
cio Joseph Edward
P.O. Box 3554
Aspen, Colorado 81612 Job No. 198 578
Subject:Report Transmittal, Subsoil Study for Foundation Design, Proposed
Additions, Garage, and Accessory Structure, Fish Residence, 0204
Flying Fish Road, Garfield County, Colorado.
Dear Mr. Fish:
As requested, we have conducted a subsoil study for the proposed main house additions,
garage with an A.D.U above, and an accessory strucnlre at the subject site.
Subsurface conditions encountered in the exploratory borings drilled in the proposed
building area consist of about lL/zto2feet of fill over nil to about 2feet of very clayey
sands underlain with relatively dense sandy gravel and cobble alluvium. Groundwater
was encountered in the borings between 2 and 4 feet below the ground surface.
The proposed building construction can be founded on spread footings placed on the
natural gravel subsoils and designed for an allowable bearing pressure of 3,000 psf.
The report which follows describes our exploration, summarizes our findings, and
presents our recommendations. It is important that we provide consultation during
design, and f,reld services during construction to review and monitor the implementation
of the geotechnical recommendations.
If you have any questions regarding this report, please contact us.
Sincerely,
HEP$qRTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
Rev. By: DEH
DAY/rso/ksm
David A. Ydt'ng, P.E.
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t
I
I
I
t
I
I
I
I
TABLE OF CONTEIYTS
PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY . . '
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION . .
SITE CONDITIONS
SUBSIDENCE POTENTIAL
FIELD EXPLORATION
SUBSI.JRFACE CONDITIONS
FOUNDATION BEARING CONDITIONS
DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS
FOUNDATIONS
FLOOR SLABS
SURFACE DRAINAGE .
PERCOLATION TESTING
LIMITATIONS .
FIGURE 1 - LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS
FIGURE 2 - LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS
FIGURE 3 - LEGEND AND NOTES
FIGURE4-5.GRADATIoNANALYSESTESTRESULTS
TABLEI-SUMMARYoFLABoRAToRYTESTRESULTS
4
4
6
6
7
H.P GEOTECH
3
I
I
I
I
lr
lr
lr
lr
l:ll
lr
lr
lr
lr
ll
PT]RPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY
This report presents the results of a subsoil srudy for proposed additions, an
accessory structure and a garage at the Fish Residence, 0204 Flying Fish Road,
Garfield Counry, Colorado. The project site is shown on Fig. 1. The purpose of the
study was to develop recommendations for the foundation design. The srudy was
conducted in accordance with our agreement for geotechnical engineering services to
John Fish cio Joseph Edward dated August 2l' 1998.
A fietd exploration program consisting of exploratory borings was conducted to
obtain information on subsurface conditions. Samples of the subsoils obtained during
the field exploration were tested in the laboratory to determine their classification and
engineering characteristics. The results of the field exploration and laboratory testing
were analyzed to develop recommendations for foundation types, depths and allowable
pressures for the proposed building foundation. Subsoil profile and percolation testing
was also performed in the proposed septic disposal site to evaluate the infiltration
characteristics of the subsoils. This report summarizes the data obtained during this
study and presents our conclusions, design recommendations and other geotechnical
engineering considerations based on the proposed construction and the subsoil
conditions encountered.
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION
The proposed building construction will consist of additions to the existing
residence, an accessory structure and a detached garage with an A.D.U. above located
on the site as shown on Fig. 1. The building construction will be I and 2 story with
lower floors near the existing ground surface. The ground floors may be a combination
of slab-on-grade and structurally supported over crawlspace. Grading for the
construction is assumed to be relatively minor with cut depths between about 2 to
4 feet. we assume relatively light foundation loadings, typical of the proposed type of
construction. An on-site septic disposal system is planned in the northeast part of the
site as shown on Fig. 1.
H-P Grorecn
I
I
t
I
Itll
lr
lr
lr
lr
lr
lr
lr
t:
lr
lr
t:
)-
If building loadings, location or grading plans gfuange significantly from those
described above, we should be uotified to reevaluate the recommendations contained in
this report.
SITE CONDITIONS
The site is along the north side of the Roaring Fork River about 2 miles east of
Catherine Store. The ground surface is relatively flat with a slight slope down to the
southwest towards the river. The lower part of the site adjacent to the river is
apparently in the 100 year flood plain. Elevation difference across the proposed
building areas is about I or Z feet, and elevation difference across the site about 6 feet.
There has been some previous grading on the site, primarily in the area of the existing
residence and for the access drive. There are existing ponds to the north of the
residence connected by a small ditch which was flowing water at the time of our field
work. Vegetation consists of grass and weeds with several large deciduous trees in the
southwest portion of the lot. The existing underground septic system is northwest of
the residence in the area of the proposed guest house and garage.
The existing residence is a 1 and 2 story wood frame structure with lower floor
near the existing ground surface. The building is estimated at about 25 to 30 years old
and, based on cursory observations, appears in good condition from a foundation
viewpoint.
SUBSIDENCE POTENTIAL
Bedrock of the pennsylvaniatr age Eagle Valley Evaporite underlies the subject
site. These rocks ale a sequence of gypsiferous shale, frue-grained sandstone and
siltstone with some massive beds of gypsum and limestone. There is a possibility that
massive gypsum deposits associated with the Eagle Valley Evaporite underlie portions
of the lot. Dissolution of the gypsum under certain conditions can cause sinkholes to
develop and can prqduce areas of localized subsidence' During previous work in the
area, several sinkholes have been observed scattered throughout portions of the Roaring
H-P GEOTECH
I
I
I
I
lr
lr
lr
lr
lr
l:
t:
ll
.3 -
Fork valley. These sinkholes appeal similar to others associated with the Eagle valley
Evaporite in other areas of westertr Colorado'
sinkholes were not observed in the imrnediate area of the lot' No evidence of
cavities was encountered in the subsurface materials; however, the exploratory borings
were relatively shallow, for foundation design only. Based on our present knowledge
of the subsurface conditions at the site, it cannot be said for certain that sinkholes will
not develop. The risk of future ground subsidence on the subject lot throughout the
service life of the proposed residence, in our opinion, is low; however' the owner
should be made aware of the potential for sinkhole development' If further
investigation of possible cavities in the bedrock below the site is desired' we should be
contacted.
FIELD E)GLORATION
The field exploration for the project was conducted on september 4' 1998'
Three exploratory borings were drilled at the locations shown on Fig' 1 to evaluate the
subsurface conditions. Borings 1 and 2 were drilled in the proposed building areas in
the southwest part of the site and the third boring was a profile boring drilled in the area
of the proposed septic disposal system. The borings were advanced with 4 inch
diameter continuous flight augers powered by a truck-moutrted Longyear BK-5|HD
drill rig. The borings were logged by a representative of Hepworth-Pawlak
Geotechnical, Inc.
Samples of the subsoils were taken with 1% inch and 2 inch I'D' spoon
samplers'Thesamplersweredrivenintothesubsoilsatvariousdepthswithblows
from a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches. This test is similar to the standard
penetration test described by ASTM Method D-15g6. The penetration resistance varues
are an indication of the relative density or consistency of the subsoils' Depths at which
the samples were taken and the penetration resistance values are shown on the Logs of
Exploratory Borings, Fig.2. The samples were returned to our laboratory for review
by the project engineer and testing'
H-P GEOTECH
T
t
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,4-
STJBSI,JRFACE CONDITIONS
Graphic logs of the subsurface conditions encountered at the site are shown on
Fig. 2. The subsoils in the building areas consist of about 1 to 2 feet of fill and topsoil
overlying nil to aboutZVz feet of loose clayey sand. Below depths of about 2 to 4Vz feet
medium dense to dense, sandy gravel containing cobbles and boulders was encoutrtered
to the depths drilled of 8 to 11 feet. Drilling in the dense gravel with auger equipment
was difficult due to the cobbles and boulders and drilling refusal was encountered in one
boring in the deposit.
Laboratory testiog performed on samples obtained from the borings included
natural moisture content and gradation analyses. Results of gradation analyses
performed on a small diameter drive sample (minus lVz nch fraction) of the natural
gravel soils are shown on Fig. 4. The laboratory testing is summarized in Table I.
Free water was etrcountered in the borings at the time of drilling and when
checked 5 days later at depths from about 2 to 4 feet. The subsoils were very moist to
wet with depth.
FO{]NDATION BEARING CONDITIONS
The natural gravel with cobble subsoils should provide moderate bearing
capaciry and relatively low settlement potetrtial. Spread footings bearing on the gravel
soils should be used for foundation support. Existing fill, topsoil, and fine grained soils
should be removed as needed to bear on the gravels. The excavations may need to be
dewatered if groundwater is encountered.
DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS
FOUNDATIONS
Considering the subsoil conditions encountered in the exploratory borings and
the nature of the prgposed construction, we recommend the building construction be
founded with spread footings bearing on the natural gravel with cobble soils.
H.P GEOTECH
I
I
I
I
lr
lr
lr
lr
t:
l:
l:
l:
l:
5-
The desigu and construction criteria presented below should be observed for a
spread footing foundation system.
1) Footings placed on the undisturbed nanral gravel soils should be
designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of 3,000 psf. Based on
experience, we expect settlement of footings designed and constructed as
discussed in this section will be about 1 inch or less and essentially occur
during the construction.
2) The footings should have a minimum width of 16 inches for continuous
walls and 2 feet for isolated Pads'
3) Exterior footings and footings beneath unheated areas should be provided
with adequate soil cover above their bearing elevation for frost
protection. Placement of foundations at least 36 inches below exterior
grade is typically used in this area'
4) Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span
local anomalies such as by assuming an u6upported length of at least
10 feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining structures should also be
designed to resist a lateral earth pressure corresponding to an equivalent
fluid unit weight of 45 Pcf'
5) All existing filt, topsoil, fine grained soils and any loose or disturbed
soils should be removed and the footing bearing level extended down to
the firm natural gravel with cobble soils. If water seepage is
encountered, the footing areas should be dewatered before concrete
placement. The dewatering can probably be accomplished by trenches
placed outside of footing areas and sloped to a sump where the water can
be pumped. A shallow depth of crushed rock can be placed in the bottom
of the excavation to aid in the dewatering and allow construction in the
dry.
6) A representative of the geotechnical engineer should observe all footing
excavations prior to concrete placement to evaluate bearing conditions.
H-P GEOTECH
3)
T
I
I
I
I
I
t
I
I
T
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-6-
FLOOR SLABS
The natural on-site soils, exclusive of topsoil, are suitable to support lightly
loaded slab-on-grade constnrction. Existing fill, topsoil and soft soils need to be
removed and subgrade re-established with compacted structural fill' To reduce the
effects of some differential movement, floor slabs should be separated from all bearing
wallsandgg|gmnswithexpansionjoinswhichallowunrestrainedverticalmovement.
Floor slab control joints should be used to reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking'
The requiremetrts for joint spacing and slab reinforcement should be established by the
designer based on experience and the intended slab use' A minimum 4 inch layer of
free-draining gravel can be placed beneath slabs to act as a leveling course' This
material should consist of minus 2 inch aggregate with at least 50% retained on the
No. 4 sieve and less than 12% passng the No' 200 sieve'
Atl fill materials for support of floor slabs should be compacted to atleast9lflo
of maximum standard Proctor densiry at a moisture cotrtent near optimum' Required
fill can consist of the on-site gravels devoid of vegetation, topsoil and oversized rock'
SURFACE DRAINAGE
Perimeter foundation drains around the building areas should not be needed
provided the excavation is above high groundwater level and positive surface drainage
is provided. Due to the shallow groundwater, damp crawlspace conditions should be
expected, even with adequate venting. The following drainage precautions should be
observed during construction and maintained at all times after the buitdings have been
completed:
1)
2)
lnundation ofthe foundation excavations and underslab areas should be
avoided during construction.
Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and
compacted to at least 95% ofthe maximum standald Proctor density in
pavement and slab areas and to at least 90% of the maximum standard
Proctor density in landscape areas'
The ground surface sunounding the exterior of the buildings should be
sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions. we
H.P GEOTECH
t
I
I
ll
lr
lr
lr
lr
l:
l:
t:
l:
ll
-7-
recommend a minimum slope of 6 inches in the first 10 feet in "npaved
areas and a minimum slope of 3 inches in the fust 10 feet in paved areas'
Granular wall backfill should be capped with about 2 feet of the on-site
finergrainedsoilstoreducesurfacewaterinfiltration.
4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limis of
all backfill.
PERCOLATION TESTING
Percolation tests were conducted on September 9, 1998 to evaluate the feasibility
of an infiltration septic disposal system at the site' One prof,le boring and three
percolation holes were drilted at locations as shown on Fig' 1' The test holes were
drilled with 6 inch diameter auger (P-1) and hand dug (P-2 and P-3), and were soaked
with water one day prior to testing. Two other initial auger test holes were abandoned
due to groundwater in the bottom and the hand dug holes added' The soils encountered
in the percolation holes are similar to those encountered in the Profile Boring shown on
Fig. Zand consist of about 2 feetof topsoil overlying soft sandy silty clay with coarse
gravel alluvium below about 4 feet depth. Groundwater level was about 2 feet deep in
the area. The percolation tests results, presented in Tabte II' indicate average rates of
about 90 minutes in the topsoil (based on the last 3 readings) and no percolation rate in
the clay soils. The auger drilling may have smeared the clay soils in the P-l hole and
reduced the percolation rate. Based on the subsurface conditions encountered and the
percolation test results, we recorrmend that a civil engineer design the septic disposal
system.
LIMITATIONS
This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted
geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time' We make no
warranty either expressed or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted
in this report are based upon the data obtained from the exploratory borings drilled at
the locations indicated on Fig. 1, the proposed type of construction and our experience
H.P GEOTECH
I
I
I
T
lrlt
lr
lr
lr
lr
lr
lr
l:
lr
lr
lr
t:
.8-
in the area. Our findings include interpolation and extrapolation of the subsurface
conditions identified at the exploratory borings and variations in the subsurface
conditions may not become evident until excavation is performed' If conditions
encountered during construction appeal different from those described in this report' we
should be notified so that re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made'
This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design
purposes. We are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our
information. As the project evolves, we should provide continued consultation and field
services during construction to review and monitor the implementation of our
recommendations, and to verify that the recommendations have been appropriately
interpreted. Significant design changes may require additional analysis or modifications
to the recommendations presented herein. we recommend on-site observation of
excavations and foundation bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a
representative of the geotechnical engineer'
Sincerely,
HEPWORTH,<?4,MCAL, INC.
Daniel E. Hardin, P.E.
DAY/rso
cc: Sopris Engineering - Atrn: Yancy Nichol
H-P GEOTECH
I
I
I
T
I
I
I
T
t
T
t
t
I
I
T
I
I
t
I
A},,NG flSH ROAD
APPROXMAIE SCALE
1'= 50'
PROPOSED
\ sEP_TtC DTSPOSAL P 1'\ *il a\R. a
\ P2
pRoHr-g o\.
BoRTNG '\
\
\
\
I
I
I
I\
LEGEND
. EXPLORATORY
BORING
. A PERCOLATION
TEST HOLE
\\
\
5320
\r \r/
-\-r t,
ti. PRoPoSED ( t\-__- gLTAg:^[n-r )
=
-\r\- ADU ABO\E ( 6
lFt \ (J-\ Zl\ E,EXIST]NG PONO\z \\E.l=:'uJ
'-";t'
{{l FrrI'"))
STRUCruRE r -BoR,*G o . .-\
1--2"'" _'\ \-
d -J ,*oro6
/ AoDtTloNs
/\\
6320 \WL-'\__/- aoRrNG 1!fl;.A\. \.- \= ts'.Il' -j\.\\\--\ 6322*?*,,,*
6324
6322
198 578 HEPWORTH - PAWLAK
GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS
AND PERCOLATION TEST HOLES Fig. 1
TI
rl
rl
rl
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
lD
o)
LL
I
C
.9
o
q)
Lt
so/11
-2OO:2
631 5
o
o)l!
I
c
.9
o
c,i;
50/1'.|
+/t-48
-2Oo-11
631 0
2/6,1o/o
e/6.1o/o
6320
BORING 1
ELEV. : 632/
BORING 2
ELEV. = 6321'
PROFILE BORING
ELEV. = 632+'
Note: Explonotion of symbols is shown on Fiq' 3'
6/12
tYC=J0.3
-20O:38
21/6.10/o
2+/12
631 0
631 5
LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGSHEPWORTH PAWLAK
GEOTECHNICAL, INC.198 578
6320
I
T
LEGEND:
D( flLL; monploced sondy grovel with cobbles, silty ond cloyey, medium dense. moist to very moist,
X dork brown.
aH TOPSOIIj orgonic sondy silty cloy. soft, very moist, block.a
lE CLAy (CL*SC); very sondy ot Profile Boring to cloyey sond ot Boring 1, silty, soft to loose,
E] very moist to wet, dork brown, low plosticity-
FJ GRA\EL AND COBBLES (cM-cP); with smoll boulders, sondy, slightly silty, medium dense to dense
H with depth, wet, brown. rocks ore rounded to subrounded.
I
n Relotively undisturbed drive somple; 2-inch l.D. Colifornio liner somple.
t'
I
Drive sompte: stondord penetrotion test ( SPI ), t S/a-inch l.D. split spoon somple, ASru D - 1586.
_ Drive somole blow count: indicotes thot 24 blows of o 140-pound hommer folling 30 inches were
24/12 required to drive the Colifornio or SPT sompler 12 inches-
0.5
= Free woter level in boring ond number of doys ofter drilling meosurement wos mode-
-
Depth ot which boring coved when meosured on September 9, 1998.
T
I Procticol rig refusol.
NOTES:
'l . Explorotory borings were drilled on September 4, 1998 with o 4-inch diometer continuous flight power
ouger.
2. Locotions of explorotory borings were meosured opproximotely by pocing from feotures shown
on the site Plon Provided.
3. Elevotions of explorotory borings were obtoined by interpolotion between contours on the site plon
provided.
4. The explorotory boring locotions ond elevotions should be considered occurote only to the degree implied
by the method used.
5. The lines between moteriols shown on the explorotory boring logs represent the opproximote boundories
between moteriol types ond tronsitions moy be groduol.
E. Woter level reodings shown on the logs were mode of the time ond under the conditions indicoted'
Fluctuotion in woter level moy occur with time-
7. Loborotory Testing Results:
WC=WoterContent(Z)
*4 : Percent retoined on No. 4 sieve.
-2OO : Percent posslng No. 200 sieve.
198 578 HEPWORTH PAWLAK
GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
LEGEND AND NOTES Fig. J
I
I
I
T
T
I
I
t
I
t
T
t
I
I
I
I
I U.S. SIATDARD SERES
21,l(l
r@t
HR. 7 HRutl. 't5 taN.60 Llt.19 rail. { Lil, , LN,,rq,Fo
(.)
aa
I
zso
LJ
CJ
E.
UJ
o_
olrl
Z.
F
trJt
Fz.
uJ(J
E.L]
o-
.oo5 .ooc .o71 .r5O .3OO .600 r.18 236 4.75 9.5..-. t9-0
DIAMETER OF PARTICLES IN MILLIMETERS
76.2 i5212r
GRAVET 48 SAND 41 SILT AND CLAY 'I1
LIQUID LIMIT PLAST]CIry INDEX
ot lO FeetSAMPLE OF: Slightly Silty Sondy Grovel FROM: Boring
198 578 HEPWORTH PAWLAK
GEOTECHNICAL, INC.GRADATION TEST RESULTS Fig. 4
I
I
T
t
I
I
T
I
t
I
t
I
I
t
I
f,5' t
J1@
203
E
cbox
Jcl696E
E E'
oo
o)
oo
(l)l
o
Lol
!
oo
=,-o
-}
ga
E
o
ct)
rc,
Coa
6!-296-
6HEEosF2=q
J(J
@F
=
GUo
UFF
9x
3EE
o-
==*
np;;@
cf)c{
zIF
o
Eo
o-?sq {
Jg?FE-o
@$
EeEc>o
JlgF<=zd,)s^3E!€<ooz=o
CO
o
cf)
z9ts
oo
rJr
=o
FE c{o r.o
ozao6
N
ao
lr)
@o,
dz
d)o-)
I
I
I
I
I
t
t
I
I
I
I
I
T
I
I
ll
lr
lr
lr
dz aj5
3A
z1!6nlrl l-
u.t-H(9,rlEvd#1fl8
=1+o
FE,
oZ
==O-a
TIJ
I
T
I
I
I
I
I
t
t
I
I
T
I
T
T
I
I
T
I
t
HEPWORTH.PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
TABLE II
PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS JOB NO. 198 578
Note: Percolation tests holes were drilled on September 4, 1998 with 6-inch diameter auger
(P-1) and hand dug holes (P-2 and P-3) pre-soaked on September 8, 1 998. Percolation
tests were conducted on September 9, 1998 by Hepworth Pawlak Geotechnical. Test
P-1 was in very sandy clay soils and tests P-2 and P-3 in topsoil. Hole P-1 had 15 inch
depth of water at start of test from the pre-soaking. The average percolation rate was
based on the last 3 readings of each test.
HOLE NO.HOLE DEPTH
(!NCHES)
LENGTH OF
INTERVAL
(MIN)
WATER DEPTH
AT START OF
INTERVAL
(INCHES)
WATER DEPTH
AT END OF
INTERVAL
(!NCHES)
DROP IN
WATER
LEVEL
flNCHES)
AVERAGE
PERCOLATION
RATE
(MrN./rNCH)
P-1 301t2 20
30
60
16 314 16 3t4 o
none
16 3/4 16 3t4 0
16 3/4 16 314 0
P-2 15112 15 11 314 11 112 114
90
11 1t2 11 1t4 1t4
11 1t4 11 114 0
11 114 11 114
11 10 3t4 1t4
10 3/4 10 3t4 0
10 3t4 10 1t2 114
10 1t2 10 114 1t4
P-3 12 15 a 112 8 1t2
90
8 7 314 114
7 3t4 7112 1t4
7 1t2 71t2 0
7 112 7 114 114
71t4 7 1t4
7 7 0
7 6 3t4 114
I
I
I
lr
lr
lr
lr
l:
lr
l:
t:
John Fish
C/O JosePh Edward
P. O. Box 3554
Aspen, CO 81612
RE: Individual Sewage Disposal System Design for
Fish Resid "n"",-O214ityittg
Fish Road, Garfield County, Colorado
SE Job No. 98099.01
Item # 8
Dear Mr. Edward;
Attached herewith is the revised report and design for the subject site improvements per your request' we
have made some adjustments to oui design based on the new information regarding the proposed
improvements you provided us in addition to the previous report.
Existing Site Conditions :
The subject site is located adjacent to the Roaring Fork River at0204 Flying Fish Road in Garfield County,
colorado. The existing main house has three bedrooms. water is supplied by a well on the property next
to the existing house near the southeast corner of the property. The existing ground surface near the area
for the proposed septic system slopes to the southwest at a 0.30 oh gtade' The finished floor elevation for
the current residence rs 6324.2feet (msl) and the nominal elevation of existing ground at the location of the
proposed leach field is 6325.0 +/- (msl)'
The current owner intends to construct additions to the existing house, yet maintain the living quarters at
three bedrooms. Other improvements to the property include building a separate garage with living
quarters equivalent to two bedrooms and a separate accessory structure. The total number of bedrooms for
t^he design of the proposed system will be five (5) unless noted otherwise'
Subsurface Conditions:
Attached herewith are the results of the subsurface investigation and percolation tests conducted by
Hepworth-pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. dated September 16, 1998. The subsoil encountered at the site
consists of about two (2') feet of compacted backfill above very clayey sands underrain with dense sandy
gravel and cobble alluvium of about two (2',) feet depth. The groundwater table was encountered at about
two feet below the ground surface in the profile pit. Due to the slow absorption rates and high
groundwater table, ihe system will need to be elevated, then bedded with acceptable soils imported to the
site.
SoPRls EttGlllEERlllG o ll'G civil consultants
I
I
I
T
I
I
I
I
t
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t
I
Page2
Fish PropertY
SE Job No. 98099.01
Final System Design:
A site plan is provided to detail the various components of the proposed sewage disposal system. Please
note that the location of the proposed leach field system is required to be outside the floodplain. The new
field must be constructed as a mound system since the water table is so close to the surface of the ground.
The following pages detail the technical criteria utilized in design of the proposed system.
Design Criteria:
proposed residence is a 3 bedroom house with a detached garage having 2 bedrooms above the garage'
The design flows are calculated as follows:
Residence unit - 3 bedrooms @ 2 person /bedroom:6 person
Garage unit - 2 bedroom @2person/ bedroom:4 person
Total # ofoccupants: 10 Person
From the Garfield County I. S. D. S. Regulation;
Max. design flow (Q) : # of people x 1.5 x (avg. flow)gaVperson/day x 75 gaVperson/day
Q: 10*75*1.5: ll25 gaVdaY
Septic Tank Design:
Main House and Garage Unit
Q: 10*75*1.5:1125
Volume (V) of tank: Design Flow * 1.25
V: 1125 gaVday * 1.25:1406 gallons
(30 hour retention time)
Use one 1500 gallon tank for the garage and main house'
Note: Total allowable tank capacity from I. S. D. S. Regulation: 1250 + (1*250): 1500 gallons.
Percolation Test Results:
Attached herewith are the results of the subsurface investigation and percolation tests conducted by
Hepworth-pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. dated September 16, 1998. As mentioned above, the groundwater
table was encountered at about two feet below the ground surface in the profile pit'
Three test holes were used with varying absorption rates with the first test hole measuring no rate of
absorption, yet the other two test holes were measured at 90 minutes per inch. The results of the
percolation test indicated the subsurface soils are unacceptable for a conventional absorption field system
without modifications to the soil. Garfield County Regulations will not accept absorption rates longer than
60 minutes per inch for design of conventional leach field systems without modified soils. Also,
Regulations require the bottom of the leach field system to be a minimum four feet above the water table.
Therefore, an elevated or Mounded Soit Absorption Disposal System is recommended for this site.
I
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
t
I
I
I
I
T
t
I
I
I
I
Page 3
Fish ProPertY
SE Job No. 98099.01
Absorption Field Disposal System Design:
A (SF):-Q/5 * ./T : where A: Area; Q = flow (gaVday)
!t : sqrrute root of time of absorption rate (min'/inch)
This design will give a recommended minimum absorption field area:
S= (ll25t5) .
'i90 = 2135 sq. ft'
Thus, using imported sandy loam soil yields the minimum area: A:Q/LTAR : 112510'72: 1,563 sq' ft'
Use: Minimum 36, x 60' absorption field or dimensions to obtain 2135 sq. ft. minimum.
Site Improvements Layout:
In retrospect of the current conditions, all septic tank and sewage lines must be watertight for reasons that
much of the proposed septic system will be placed at or below the water table. A dosing tank of 600
gallons .upu.ityir r..oro-.nded due to the size of the absorption area and have automatic liquid level
Jontrols. A grinder pump will be needed to pump sewage to the elevated distribution field and sufficiently
sized to maintain a discharge velocity of 5 feet per second. The dosing tank will be fed from the septic
tank. The tank must be watertight therefore, it is recommended to install a one piece septic tank unit to
prevent groundwater infiltration into the septic system'
General Notes:
1) All materials and installation practices shall conform to the Garfield County Individual Sewage
Disposal Regulation.
2) All sewer lines in the system shall be Schedule 40 or SDR-35 PVC unless specified otherwise on the
plans.
3) The contractor shall ensure that the concrete septic tank and sewer lines are completely watertight.
4) The bed area must be protected to prevent damage from vehicular or livestock traffic and must be
crowned to divert drainage runoff away from the bed'
5) The contractor shall not excavate to a depth greater than two feet (2') at any one location within the site
ofthe proposed bed.
6) The mound shall be planted (sod or mulch seeding) with suitable vegetative cover.
7) The sand material utilized in the bed shall have an effective size betweet0.25 mm and 1.00 mm. The
uniformity coeffrcient shall be 4.0 or less.
S) Add t'wo-way cleanouts on each service line from
9) Livestock should not be confined in the field area.
the house and garage.
10) A11 septic and dosing tanks will require anchoring where groundwater is present.
I
I
I
lr
lr
lr
lr
lr
lr
l:
l:
ti
Page 4
Fish ProPertY
SE Job No. 98099.01
our design and recommendations are based upon data supplied to us by others. If subsurface or site
conditions are found to be different from thosi decided in this revised report, we should be notified to
evaluate the effect it may have on the proposed ISDS. If the county Environmental Health Department
requests changes o, -oiin"rtions to tits aesign, we should be contacted to evaluate the effect on the ISDS'
If you have any question or need any additional information , please call'
ERING, LLC
Sincerely,
Project Engineer
{
&
T!
I
I
I
I
I
GENERAL IIO'IES:
{
GRAPEIC SC.rT
r) ALL TTATEBALS AND tNSTAi-r-AIdr pRACIlcEs gi ll- @NFm,( m. IHE GARFIELD CoUNTY II{0VIIJAL sEwAGf, DISPGAL REd'JLAT]0I.zl tF sEreR:ulq! rN-tHE s\srEu sH^Lt 9€ so{EDlJrJ,+o oR sR_Jlt
6)
e)
'to)
6)
7)
r)
4)
PVC UICESSIPEEfiEtsgIHERITS ON THE PT,,{S.I}IE CO{]RACTOR SiIfJ. ENSURE ]HAT IHE Cot{CRCO{Cf,EIE SEPIIC TA'{(AND SEWER L'NES ARE @I1PI.E'ELY I|A'IERIIG1{T..IHE 8ED AREA TUST 8E PROIECIED TO PRf\ErT DII'^GE FROY
IENEJL R OR U\,tSToCX TR mc AIO LUSt BE CRoTNED fO Ol\mrDRAINIGE RUNOFF
^WAY
FROI.{ IHE 8M..IHE CO+''RACTOR SHALL NOT O(CIVATE TO A OEPrH GREA1B'IHI}{IY,O FEr (2) AT Alty (xE LoOAION rrIHN ]1€ gTE OF DrE
PROPOSED BO.
l|llrjJu]\Ig s{ LL EE pL^NtD (SOO OR yttlcH smtNc) uaH
SUITASLE IECETATI\E COVER..IHE SANO UA1EIIAL U'IUZED IN lHE BED 9{{r HAVT AN EFFECITAETF BETS,EEN 0.?5 ty AllD 1.00 XM. IltE UMFOFIITY CO€FF|CIO{T
SHALL BE 4.0 M LESS
ADD Irc-WAY O.E^XqJIS OI.I EACH 5ERIICE UXE FROT IHE HCI.ISEAND GARACE.
qiE!199,( sl{(,LD NOr BE Ccr.IFlr|ED tx rHE FIEL
^REAALL SEPTIC A'IO DOslNG TANKS TLL FEqJNE ANO{ORIIG T|IIEREcRouxDw IEn ts PRES8{T-
5)(rE )II.D I
ESrxlEfi umt E
c/.r,rDLD Goarf,tr' a0zail,o
FISH RESIDENCE
GX llllIc ttSS IorDProPcrD L & D. S. Prlr
&sr 'lEtrltA'cta.ut 6 no(m)Mr
lr
lr
l,t
I
I
---=(-
tt
') / ,--r-tt
Fonn No.
lGws-zs
OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER
COLORADO DMSION OF WATER RESOURCES
818 Ceotennial Bldg., 1313 Sherman St. Derwer, Colorado B@03
(303) 86&3s8r
.f "
., l.J
j{r
'lili :
,r:'Item # 9
E(ST
T
WETL PERMTT NUMBER 0Bs899Z r-..-).-r
*-DIV. 5 CNTY. 23 WD 38 DES. BASIN
Lot 11 Block: Filing: Subdiv: SCHULTZ
APPROVED WELL LOCATION
GARFIELD COUNTY
sw 114 NE 114 Sedion 32
Twp 7 S MNGE 87 W 6th p.M.
DISTANCES FROM SECTION LINES
265C Ft. from South Section Une
3000 Ft. from west Section Line
l*
I
I
I
JOHN W FISH
BOX 82sO
MADISON WI
(608)244€s76
JR
s3708-
PERMTTTO USE AT.I E(IS]ING WEII
1)
2)
3)
ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT CONFER A WATER RIGHT
CONDMONS OF APPROVAL
This well shall be used in such a way as to cause no material injury to existing water rights. The issuance of thepermit does not €rssure the applicant that no injury will occur to another vested water right or preclude anotherowner of a vested water right from seeking relief in a civil court action.
The construction of this wellshall be in compliance with the Water Well Consruction Rules 2 CCR 4OZ-2, unlessapproval of a variance has been granted by the State Board of Examiners of Water Welt Construction and pump
lnstallation Contractors in accordance with Rule 1g.
Approved pursuant to cRS 37-90-137(2) forthe use of an existing well, permit no. 1G3814 (expired), appropriatingground water tributary lo _lhe Roaring Fork River, as an afternate point of diversion to the Basalt Conduit, on thecondation that the well shall he operated ontv when the Basaft Water Conservanry Dastrict's substitute water supplyplan' approved by the State Engineer, is in effea and when a water allotment contract between the well owner andthe Basalt water Conservanry District for the release of replacement water from Ruedi Reservoir is in effect, ggunder an approved plan for augmentation. BWCD conract #3.g.5270.
The use of ground water from this well is limited to ordinary household purposes inside two (2) single familydwellings and the irrigation of not more than 1,50o square feeiof home gardens and lawns, all located oi a singteresidential site described as lot 1 1, SchulE Subdivision, Garfield County.- ett use of this well wili Oe curtaiteO unlessthe water allotment contract or a plan for augmentation is in effea.
The mar<imum pumping rate shall not exceed 15 GpM. i/---\The average annual amount of ground water to be appropriated shall not exceedro.g acrl,root (293,265 gallons).
A totalizing flow meter must be installed on this welland maintained in good wo*hgrdoer. perrnanent recordsof all diversions must be maintained by the well owner (recorded at leai annually) and sutrmitted to the DivisionEngineer upon request.
The well must be located not more than 2oo feet from the location specified on this permh.
The owner shall mark the well in a conspicuous ptace with well permit number(s), name of the aquifer, and courtcase number(s) as appropriate. The or/ner shall take necessary means and precautions to preserve thesemarkings.1}D F_)_qe
4)
s)
6)
4
8)
e)
ROVED
JD2
Sn ErglrE (
0399399
A.
Receipt No.DATE ISSUED AUG [I 7 19
- k'6E*,-+96 &*l*oN DA'E AUG 0I 199
t
t
II
II
I
T
It
II
I 0Ec, - r 4' e8 (Hoil)l4:41 l{RIGHT ITATER
lliL"tOltlEr.lrof
TEL:303 480 1020
DEPAFTIIEilT OF TI{E AEIIY
u,s. Ahry EllclilEEE qsTHcr, slcnlltEltTo
COBPS OF EINOIilEEN5
ttz J SITEEI
SlcnlrElaro. cAlrFontatl tgu.-2s211
P, 002
Item #10I
T
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t
I
I
I
t
December 8, L99S
Regulatory Braneh (1999?5492)
Mr, John Flsh
Post Office Box B2S0
Madlson, Wieconsin 53208
Dear Mr. Fish:
. r am responding to your reque:t, srrbmiEted by l[righr HaterEngineers, f9r a Dcpartment of Che Army ;:ermit to- perf5rm variousacLivities within watcrs of the united-sEates orr your propertynear carbondale. .The Frojecu ls loeated adjacent to E-he i.oariugFork River approximately one mile uprtream of c"ttr"rine'a stsorenear Ehe eentcr of SecElon 32, Tor,rnship Z South, Range g? West,Garfield CounEy, Colorado.
r wieited the properEy wlth you and Ms. Blair r.cisure ofWriglt Water Engineera on $epEernblr 19, 1998. The projectinvorvee various improvementL on your properEy whicl iircrude adrlvgway, pond dredging, and random uouralr piaccments. Thechief -of _Enginecra hae-issued nat,ionwide genEral perndt numb€re14 and 18 which aut,horizee the discharge 6r dredgEd or filrrnaterlal in watere of the united StateE for mj.noi road crossingsand minor discha_rges. Ey ret,ter daced Nowember 6, 199g, wcconsurted with rhe u.s. Flsh and llild1if,e se:rrice (senrice) onour determinatj.on that_ the proj-ect may affect, but is nor iilreryt,o adverscl-y affect, Ehreat,ened or endangcred species proEected-by the_Endangered Species Act.. The Senrice reslonded in a letterdated December 2, 1998, their coneurrence with lti" determination(see enclosure). Therefore, your project can be consEructedunder the above authorities pioviaEa ihe work meets thecondlt.ione lieted on thc enclosed information sheets. you mustsarso send finished photographs and a signed letter ofcertj.fication r-o the 9orp" of rngmeers wtthin 30 daye afrereompletion o{.the work (lee geneial condition number 1.4). A copyof the certification sratemeit is inciuaea for your Ga.
Thie werificatton ie walid for Ewo yearg from thc date ofthis letter. If yorr hava not compreted irorrr pr;ject uy-ttrat!i8", yog shourd sonE,acE, Ehe corpi of gniineeie io obri:-ninformation on any changee whieh-may travE occurred to Ehcnationwid.e permits. you are resporriible f,or remain5.u.g intormedof such cha.nges.
I
DEc, -14'98([l0l,l) l4:41 l{RIGHT ItATER TEL:303 480 1020 P, 003
t
I
I
I
t
T
I
I
I
I
I
t
I
I
I
t
I
t
-2-
WeharreassigmednumberLgge7s4g?Eoyogr.p'9lecE.Pleaserefer to thIE ,ru*6er in any correspondenee wit,h this office' If
you have any questions, PILase contact me at telephone number
lgzo) 243-LL99, extension 16.
Sincere1Y,
Susan Bachini NaIl
Envj-ronmental Engineer
Northwestern Colorado Regrrlatsory Office
402 Rood Avenue, Room 142
Grand Jr:ncuion, Colorado 81501-2563
Enclosureg
Coples Furnished:
,r4". Blair IJeisure, Wrig_ht Hater Engiaeers, 2490 t0est 26t'h Avenue,' Suit.e 100A, Denver, Colorado 802I'1
Mr. Robert ei"f.ey, Coloradc. 'ivision of Wild1ife, 7L]- Independent
Avenue, Grand .firnct.ion, Colorado 81501
I4B.,Susan T. Moyer, U.S. Fish and Wi]d]if,e Service, 764 Horizcn
Drive. South innex A, Grand Jr.rgctiOn, Colorado 81.506-3946
Mr. Mark Bean, Gartield courtty. 109 gth streeE, suitc 303,
Glenwood SPrirrgs, Colorado 81501
i
,lt. . ; rlrt r,-' I
f PJ"Lt,,:riyl ilirnll'r- I']I":'['L
.Irrlt:; ir. FI:ll , .l '.
I I '; 1.,- l.r:'* -rori l, I ' ri -
:iriiisn", !iise,,'sqrn il7!3.n=in
( ,rrf ! ,.1 l:'4 ':rit' "{K)OLI[xol
)r I
5 i r''r i-
'l i r:,1
1.i ... !
-'..-,. l
- -' .;. -". -..2-.].Rncordcr'
-oo,4'--'
-j. Dr)\ k. -..'j* i' ' .. r:-,1:
l+r1.,
Item #11 i
=
I . {.;i;,
i'tt.r ;:{i i
i.. .+,',-,Ffa'/rr'P ,. -'![f.j:.i..'... .
a. - {.,-r r'!:j
l:i,itiiii't: , :. 'ritii til 1rl , _i.!' j;' j,--Si-jr,,!,.
ari:ir\ ..i , { :,.iiij'$.iiYi''l.,:.1'.-';, -.'
;*;:;rl..}ii..i -
ti':'i'i ''.
,\.i i;;'r.,,; I
rAri 439
I tri. | )t,t.tt. r",'t,
1,. . ," .)4,i I l-;I
'!a. ":lt-'3Qc
'13/ /
DOLI,ARS,
'e, ,:'-.i.'. ,,
'qia"';; '
I
f#ri,iil...:,- .,
{':"r;ii.,ilA-',.i.i.. . -:la\r,-:1.' 4.,'
isiiil.i:.r: . ;i-'.1:q,i,.. !:
;i*tll:ttl !..: ,:
1,lf ';1.':rt.llt. i5"'r' '1r'l 1:r' ieS^'t' 'i :'\:tr'i'r a"l rrrr:iri'rtfiortof tlres::mof
'I'cn <lol Jars ant: otirer v;r1l:abI'r conridr'!rations
t,r r,rr..ri,! p:rrr ics or,i. rir'r ,ar ir' f1r't,''l-'-' :t :"jl.l'l 1, ."r::.t::r:::"1::Tr:;;:l;-:::J[t*t
o
i.:l:i,,':;li::::.1:; ::':,.1":;, rli';;" il.,': .'..r'l'"',;;;:::::,';:l:' ";';""'" pe:'ntr da
l' :,",:,:::l;;: .l"ll.i-, ) ";:;;;;i ;, ],i',Y_:l,il t,, : j:l;"'" ,:;";,0,.T,i"l
;; ';";;;::'-. ,,,..o., art th' !"lnrirs o*"',"j.1.'.rr pr-rcel of l:.nd, situate' lying and l'eing ln th'
;:j;;;;',;'i";r'ie1J . rnd-S:ar^ r'i.I'ar r*r^' to+it
i, -,a rce i " i"'i":'":" :? [:::;; -
t :-n;:,' ;:: 01, 11,,"31, 1:r:: rt;::i:l.:"i J: :;: J ;
",
::';;,,' i""ni-.i' -!: :1.: I . ::" ^:' i't "'l::;'?3:u"3ll3i3l.,' i;11;^l';,l,,"iii'"1'"lrl-l;i:;:iil^i:l; or a 30 root road
;:i.r''p;;;;i-ii' ao="'ibecl as rollot's :
ar f ol. lows:
Ii nelinni-rrr: at an iron post with a brass cap Eroperly narked for the
:' southe.rsa "ot,'t'-i:"s!tli"n ]3 9f said rownship and RanEe;
,l t;,"nce H. 6Go SZ,"iZ';"i-.-7g2_3.OiC "".1-,1
. gZ'3'8' 00" W' 318'75 feet
,, ond ,;. 02o 30t iS"'r ' 22g'r5 feei I"--u- poi't.:t' on-the \ortherllt llne
l, ,f sai.rl f 3 f .,ot-iooa easement ' the Lrue point of beginnino;
,ii""." s.,n2o 30r 15" 1{. l-106'c7 fcct;
' :m;:: l:';l: ll: 33:: I l?i:?,'?Eli to u !?t:t on the Northerrv
' ii;,;-;:"said rint "i said 31 foot road easement;
'i, g:1-nce j. 78" j;; h;;-' 232'33'i"tt-ur""g the Northerlv llne of
i, ;il;.itr:"?;"'?;? ;3:"[:":i:is-,r""' arons the Irorthe::1'v line or
i s.:r.d 30 root '"la =""'i""i i" ti'^!:::-:i:": :l ::?::l'13;"t31'i1",i :?'t":?':i:: :?:1.=:;"U'i;';;":";';;;;'i;s 6'58 acies:
::::,.::
less'
i sufriu.a to anrl together with a 30 foot road easerrent descrilred
A sl-riP
s i tuated
87 tr'est
feet on
of lan.1 being 30 f eet in width-lo bt used as a road easen'ent
in I,ots lg .encl rl="i s--.li"n 32, Township 7 South ' Range
of Llre SixtS r.rn.'-irl llerrdian'..:uid easement being I5
each s i r1e of trre 'ioi io*ri ng descril.led centerline :
di,. ,
I
ll
i
1l
t
{
il
. ;,
",'..,,1. ,'.'l..:i i{, ,rr l,' p
?':\ 'i:,i -
';','',-,,'a'r.,,i1,.1, llil :.ir.lirl,: l1:,i,;1,.11.:i,":tli::;,:;11 ,i.1,1 -,.. l ', .r-"-i 'I ::'
, ,;'I .. .a . ..... ir-:,. a,r.l n-,,!'1. th"rrnf; rnd.nll
I
I
il
rl
l
il
it
i
n
II
II
Iq
Itli
I
I
It.II
It
tt
tI
!
it
t
I,
i
li
,.,,r'-oJ rLti440
To llli.Ii AND To lloLD thc uid premirer rlnve brgaincd end docribc{, slth thc lppurienanccf,, unto thc
said prrt y of ttte tccond-part'*nl" n"'' atd a"tirnltortvcn Ard thc rrld Panies ol thc firlt p8rt'
torthemiolvesheirs'"'*'l;;'i"ita"-a'int'tt"tott'oo-'-tovcnuLrnnt'bererlnrndrgretoand$ithii"t,a''.*v- 1,*,:":,lij:#; [],f5;;i;''' ;',*
!i"S5::ilti"l'::',:','.""ir.he:e presents afe s
lnr.lefe$il,le esttrte of r^r,.at"..,i^ltr, ln lcc eimplc' rr"t'brv"
-*"t
rlght' luil pomt rnd larlul ruthorltv to
srnnt. l)stsoln, rell ond t"ntt'''tit'L'"''n t-"1 t1-il=tt lit'r'tra' "d thtt th? lura rtr trcc and
clear lrom all torme*na ot't".', "-"o";.;"i;,
-nr, ,n"r,'i*-' o$"rmentl d rnombrrnccr of rhattrcr
kindornatureroever. Exc€pt 1977 taxes payable in 1978 and sub'iect to the
exceprions "or,."ll!u'ir,' *,"--"tt;"tfi^;;iuii' -ai
'incorPorated .
herein '
end thc rbovr rra4arned Fdnr'..t:. o.*1'15T.ffiT.fl h#rftfl 3';ff ^l"#j;ff tH:!;?:Ifr :xs*r.tlffif"l#"iT";[n;:',"-*',* ir.,Y;.il.#'S ss':l{#.:; ;'-m w,mn.nr AND f0 REVER o"*I I
tN WITI{ESS \f,BEnEOF. th' "ld Frt i"g tl.tt. f'ot F t ha'e tcrllTto tlt
end rerts 'tL du ard rar tlrrt T *T // - /') r'
Slrnc4 erlt{ rnd Dtllvcrrl h fb Pra+tl r(
PRALL
sr^130F@t BlDo'
]*
**.)':S'i;*,"n ,,Hl'T-- xrrorrodsd o'""" 1" oo - .l,s,*"1*#UT'q%lli"i'*r*"" a' Ka 6e t ? R c t t
14., ir:
eaat*t Ad6;o."r 12, l'ltu,*'wttacrmvhrn'\*;i)
MY commission exPires
and official seal.
S.JsnlI,l
bmrrrr, PRILL ,
STATE OT COI.oR,ADO
County of
The foregoing instrument e6s 5sknglu1e:knowledgedl before me t
. Lg7- bY KARell PRALL'
, 19-Wltness bY hand
il t Etll,- s ?rl t.Eil ii i,:,:c..
ll:a:
il O : E !
lrHlt .l : <:lcr i'- :
it 3 t !:tio>-,ru?!g
.rirE
9950
,C:=',
'-: u .,'a,,V=
'.2
:,: i-":
ir:irlii,|:
rl rlioiirJ-r,rilJJl:ioll i ::r t :
F., :,cz-<|tdd
\
i1
I
I
7.
i
i$
itr
:
ir il ll ii ,ii
i'll liit t
! ll I ll ,.i: ,i.r .:i ll i il . il'' 'i'j ..: lr i ll l.r', '-,9,
i t ; il ii'J -)ig
: ii : l! ,.: ,"iE
: ll i i:1 l)- Y-ii
,lrJ-t:ii 'l 'i , -.,' .ti
: , _ ,;..ie ::
i,t-L lc :L: ll !=
' 'I -L ?,il
= ..._
E6
0r
i
:
I
i
z
co
r
u
1at'r
cl
e.:*
cF.
E
e
,
6
:
o
o,
I
qr
EXHIBIT ,A,'
warranty Deed - (Pra11'/Fish)
,:,"..;Oi tACi44l
Subject to the following:
Rioht of the proprietor of a vein or lode to extract and renpv his
-krrlri tha same Ue iouna to Penetra!: ?r fi!:I::"t
"t3--ttt"."fronr-, should the same
:il: ;H: ::fi" :fri -;';;.;-;;., ;; ::i:1"'3.8" ::"i.:$ii::::":fi[';:i ii'i?Iri'il'i;i-ri-"t-iig" 363 as Reeeption
inof
:
,l
:l
I
T
T
Right of *aY for ditchea cr canals
oi'ttr"-u"it6d states as reserv"d-i"
;;y1; riiii,-r" s"or rz at Paee 363
Restrictions as clontained in instrument recorded
in Book 398 at p"i"-ee--"" Reception No' 212180'
of uay of lrenrrer and Rio, Grande Railroad Company 100 feet
rhroush the sEtswf'Ll-lt;l-ot said-section :z ana swllswrl
Section 33, as gt;t;-Uy-instnrcnt rec'orded Pebruary 2I'
itt sooL 19 at Page 39'
Rightsidth
said
1888
c.onstructed bY
, United Statea
I aa RecePtion
PatentNo. 18378.
the authority
Patent recorded
No.. 18378.
November 14, 1958,
Rioht of waY for
as-disclosed bY
at page 5I2-
' the Basin Ditch over and
uil-""a itaterent reeorded
across subJect ProPerty,-i*" 7, 1887 in Book 9
_ 's
one-ha1f' of all oil, -sae' -:?:1-al.::"$:1i.::*:l';tlnii""ltl?3i"ni1
"3:
it' ":i: i :'i il "ffi::1;ili; "*J
-
ns; * :.: : Il":1", ::Itrei'wiltr the right
to-const-ruct f acilities!('Es v' Lvt 'v -"*in" and remrrve the sal'"to progPect forr I _- :G ro.Ar, li.nHiliil"l"I;"llE""li'lEHi; j:,':***]1,:"1;,i' rl"ll3*"li;l3"ilH'!E* ii' li!:#fi=- **":ii;m:":? ;
"l' i:.:1":::*.i: ::tTlE: fi[:""H :$'ffi:i"3Il!ii";;;-th;;""r' "i- rnterests therein'
,
T
Right of way of Rocky.Io"'tt1i:.t:1:"ttf Gas Cotnpany to constEuct'
operate and nraintain-its gas piperine and appurtena:rces, over'
through, under "r,i-"".o="-suUlett
pilp"rt'--"! gt.ttt.a by inst'rment
recorded october igl-igii in ioor :lz- at page 24r'
for the continued uninterrupted flow of water in the
il""t -".ot and across subJect property'Right of waY
Roaring Fork
I
I
l
I
I
t
I
i
ffi-r!mF
l,ll
T
March 4,1999
Garfi eld County Planning Department
109 Eight Street, Suite 303
Glenwood Springs, Colorado g160l
Item # 12
To Whom It May Concem:
This letter is to acknowledge that Joseph Edward may act in my behalf in regard to mySpecial Use Permit Applications.
-