Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout3.0 CorrespondenceRoaring Fork Purchase Trust- SUP- ADU Simple ADU. TC and Scheduled for BOCC T4err),< D'-'' +fter v AKA George Conrade ,/ _ , -o-/OA-/o.r for l2ll0l07 A site visit was conducted. The site is very private and from the ADU located only residences across the Roaring Fork River can be seen. The ADU will not block views for other residences. The Roaring Fork Purchase Trust owns the adjacent lot to the North' Residence to the south cannot be seen from the ADU site' I would suggest APProval. Road and Bridge has responded and stated they have no comments- "Glaqier David Pesnichak Page 1 of2 From: David Pesnichak Sent: Thursday, December 06,2OO7 6:13 pM To: 'Michael Feigenbaum' Subject: RE: Prehm Ranch / ADU Follow up HiMichaet, Per our discussion this afternoon, and following a meeting with Fred Jarman (the Building and planning Director) and County legal staff, it is Staff's opinion that (is you correctly poinied out in your below email)the densities as described in the Comprehensive Plan aie to oe applied on a project oaiis. tn addition, a"project",applies to_not only Gartield County platted Subdivisions tiu r*"rpiions sucn as prehm Ranchas well. Since the Staff Fleport has already been distributed to the BOCC, I'will correct myrecommendation at the hearing on December 10. Best, Dave David Pesnichak Senior Planner - Long-Range Gadield County 108 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Tel: (970) 945-8212 Fax: (970)384-3470 E m a i I : d p-e S n i sh a k@ 9a rfj a ld :cq u nly._c-'slr I www. ga rf i ql-d lco-u nly. c-9 m From : Michael Feigenbaum [mailto : mfeigen ba um@brandt-law.com] Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2007 Z:39 pM To: David Pesnichak Subject: Prehm Ranch / ADU Follow up 12t6t2007 .. Glacier Page 2 of 2 HiDavid, I wanted to discuss with you the impact of the overall Prehm Ranch project consisting of approximately'190 total acres (that is, 5 x 35 acre lots, 3 x 4 acre lots +/-) has on tuttitting the objectives of thecomprehensive plan in terms of density. That is, Prehm Ranch is a unifief proleciwith many acres ofeasements for common areas running across all the propefties, for the use and benefit of elch lot. My understanding is that the comprehensive plan would consider the project as a whole, and not just anindividual parcel within the projegt,for purposes of satisfying the goals of density, etc. l,ve done someresearch on calculations. for another project, and how dehsily wai determined, ind given this research Iwould syggest that the.density. of units per acre in the Prehm Ranch project is'appro"ximately 1 unit foreu-ery 12 acres (assuming each ol the B lots has a main residence adO an ADU), ie, 1g0 acres divided by16 units equals 11 .875 acres/unit. This would more than satisfy the objectives oi tne ptan. I apologize that this is brief, but I wanted to see your understanding and reaction. I would be happy towrite something more formal if that's appropriate, if that would pro,Tide you with assist,ance. Thanks again, and when you. call. please try my cell 31 9.8334. I have learned our phones are havingsome problems, we have technicians coming out tomorrow. Michael Michael Feigenbaum Brandt Feigenbaum, PC 132 Midland Avenue, Suite 4 Basalt, CO 81621 970.925.5196 phone 970.925.4559 fax wwlwj.bf A-ndtlAw.Qe-m and then dcstr.r'i a1l coPics of tlrt u:lnsruissi<xr. afrztrlgctn(:t]f.. 12t6t2007