The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutApplication- PermitGARFIE D COUNa a BUILDING, SANITATION mtd PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1419 88:. Sem Sake 303 Glenwood Spinp, CO 81N 1(9741)9415.8212 No. 6911 lob Address �.1i.‘ Ata /d?) )J/6-3 Nature *Mork lidding Penni the°'L �l Owncr 4 Q4., (WA., coatr.atar (1Lcln2A. ,r ' 414444 p11 Amount of Permits /D /s1. PeAt 1ry7, as fekft �ee.: �'7�f5.f /�f g9�.9d 2',19?R' •09/10/98 19:53 FAX 9709639003 TIMBERLINE ENG 1111002 GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION `f(8-- 7? SC cowry ttilEr'°'°OD SPITINGftcotnaAno 1NSPEC ION UNE: (970) 945-9159 ELEPHCNE: (9'ffi) 945.1212 r f iaaotta trarla.sumbaea spaces cab!. PFRMrr NO. 6.711 JOB ADORE/Oh 1 LOr NIL EiOCKNO PARCEUSC EDU x NO. rn4-A I' 4 I00 Cf4 A_ adael-ce p 116,,' 2 amm bilLe eta:+ . 3 adrvaeia. 6 W .re 4 3 AvvLerzeusNo MOMS """' !N% 63r G2/1r.E 20.rionac 6 7 a 9 10 aarmawIMIL CUM a1PMC CAMAS eta*7011111 gLA r eaDIFIZZOI env aes t3la d umaisL IFFBAS >. 964 y.167 OMNI AMAMI aa.aaa �. rAtmaavC! aseire®rtlUblOPA atfi[rux "®. WAR1/40 ase 75oa JSJ, S'73, 0 0 NOTICE ,. MAR OS ELECTRICAL !!MIT 11 REQUIRED AND MAT 111 Dam BY THE STATE OF Tins mbar MOMS NULL AND VOID W woS1C 0R CO JTIID AUT IS NOT WIWI= Wl N T Du DAYS. 01. IF CONi73WC22F/ OR WO= 11 EIRIPENDID OR ARANIIONFD FORA PSD OF 110 DAYS AT ANY TDI AMR WDIIKIS COMEDIC= ICY =SW TEAT I HAVE READ AND =AMOCO TM AFFIXATION AND KNOW Ins 1AsfE TO BR TETE AND causer. ALL PUOV1610N1 OF l.AWs CIGyummy UM TV?! 0FTY90RK WaLBE COM+LIEDWTIAWIH.T>1 RSPEC O BURIN 01. 1,10T. TIE GRANTING OF A MAST DOB NOY PBESISIW TO QVJ3 AUII1T TO VIOLATE aR CANCEL. MS 111!DV1110NS OF ANY VIREO. sum cm. LOCal. LAW RBOCMTUiG ODMILV TSDN OR. TER PERFORMANCE Off cobrirgartICK iltlwWe atOwaat. NINANNI %co Wes Nut oamoomd iodic gam PtaraD epL AIor.11Dar ADREEMENT 11 IN la EMMY ciMMED TO moi AMMAN: As moms, ccerlluiCrellAXMLIBIL AGM OMR courucrosos OW1OD. TO OOIIiLZDCL TEs SIRIZTUR! DETAILED ONplANSAHDSECIR1CATAI$Maar=TOANCIBSV1E11BD1>YTEEBi1IDDS3DI;3!ARIMENT. coNsIDEBAnce4 OF'>38'►ZSWANCE OF TM PUMU. TIE FMB. FILMY Amin TO COAST WAJ3ALL WILDING CODE.! AND LAND LISE REGUIATICRIS ADu. ITED CIAR nh vwrY P08sLIANITO AUTEDIAY GIVENDT31121.21I MA AS AMENDED TEE SIGAGREES THAT W IBE ABOVE SAID ORDINANC8IS AJZV0T PIA COIMFI.= WIIR QT ins L0CAT1C114. EBBCDON. COM:ROO al: AND USE OMR ABOVE MOUSED 1I*UCIIIRE FEDEX SEW MIN= J.EYOEBD IoIRLF$ inscocain A1•ID133AT'1R$tI AND THEM II E MAIL MCCUE NULL AIM VOID. TEM 3SIIANCE 07 A PUJMa! BASED IMO; FLANS. SF!C P1CATTONI AIm OILIER DATA SHALL NOT ?UVia1[ T!W BUIILORiOIFICIAL PROM W101 : CORRECTION OF MEI= IN SAID PLANs. SPECIFIrA7RINS A*D OTS DATA Oa FRO 1VEM:SDia 3U!'I.DD+1O OPERATION BEING CAU1ED ON 1RERRUI+ID11R IM VIOIATICOT OF MID COLE ORANY OTTREPLORDIZIANCR Q1PA3ATION OFA ICEIRDIDTION. REVIEW OF THE SUBMITIID PUNT AND SPEarscAnotn AND L'd!PEC TI0Nl comucrw Tffi1APLSA DOES 170P Oml1SI1TIDI AN ACCMANC31 Or 10Ni ITSS3 Ca. ■ IAB�as trace BY C� IBLD 00U$I FOIL MOM. O1asSION3 OR D3 Miciss. BESPOI !� �� MEM AND DIFI IAT jIn#a+uaoaassaiucrioa.amra arecursmw.m..rar=+ rrrascsaa.tlw>@ SANDMINNA CeSO fl ARE DIMMED TO BECONSMAlIVE/ D?1 OFMEOWi�1 INURES!. a t}.fingLoo IIMANDY ACIS7+OWUI OGTINAT tsAVE Orem Atm A.sJIMMENT AHOY.. FLAN CRECSCFRE: . ?'HS'. 7/ T07AL1?66: OCC Ot10U S/ Irt LYNN DAISI9Sl1M r35Uw: SETBACKS: NUS$ .arut D. c% ao • L q=t_FR C_ )a d 1 6.1."` f V dhi ,a 3 oieP 7-22,‘,4rafteflazt- n, 4 4 Oil 47 4M 4 14 I, 1 I0 Q f, a s is 74,7/ .CJ%ry-"� 7)1 5" + 6' p / 11 ,o Y S. 7 To th -4/ c 9 3. S o S, 7 nor 77'4 2 (.0 Ropis !fQ-c_ k 6 o 8s4. It/ • • • 1602-25+ 1602.25+ 1087.25+ 7154.50+ 1147.25+ T 12593.50+ 1041.46+ 1041.46+ 706-71+ 4550.42+ 745.71+ T 3185.76+ 0•c 12593.50+ 8185.76+ T 20779.26+ 07/06/98 08:12 FAX 9709639003 TIMBERLINE ENG U1001 GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING 970-945-8212 MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING CONSTRUCTIO us ug NEW CONSTRUCTION ADDITIONS ALTERATIONS and MOVED BUILDINGS W2aacr �� Fo,1" t In order to understand the scope of the work intended under a permit application and expedite the issuance of a permit it is important that complete information be provided Adequate and complete information will prevent delays in the plan review process. Reviewing a plan and the discovery that required information has not been provided by the applicant may result in the delay of the permit issuance and in proceeding with building construction. The owner or contractor may be required to provide this information before the plan review may proceed. This causes delays because other plans that are in line for review may be given attention before the new information may be reviewed after it has been provided to the Building Department. Please review this document to determine if you have enough information to design your project and provide adequate information to facilitate a plan review. If you do not, it may be helpful to obtain a book titled "Dwelling Construction under the Uniform Building Code". This book is available to you through this department at our cost. Also, please consider using a design professional for assistance in your design and a construction professional for construction of your project. To provide for a more understandable plan in order to determine compliance with the building, plumbing and mechanical codes, applicants are requested to review the following check list prior to and during design. Applicants are required to indicate appropriately and to submit the completed check list at time of application for a permit. Post -[r Fax Note 7671 Date .7iLAI/ Ipageelw• 6 - To G 44-F, 6,9 c .,.rr'7 Frain P44e. 444 S calDept. is,Aw r 144 1i e r Co. --nmoeiturIE ed4- Phcru e 94c-72.13. Phone M cip6 4 Xr47 F8" PK -??QS Fee4t ?t 3 _1515.4 1 07/06/98 08:12 FAX 9709639003 TIMBERLINE ENG Is a site plan ' uded that indicates the distances of the proposed building or addition to property ' - s, other buildings, setback easements and utility easements? Yes 2. Does the site plan include the location of the I. S.D.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System) and the distances to property lines, wells (on subject property and adjacent properties), streams or - - r courses? Yes 3, Does the site tadicate the location and direction of the County or private road accessing the pro ? Yes 4. Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all reinforcing steel ' ccordance with the uniform building code or per stamped engineered design? Yes 5. Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl spaces aI}d tflearances required between wood and earth? Yes 6 Do the p1. s indicate the size and location of ventilation openings for the attic, roofjoist sp : - . 's,, soffits? Yes e002 7. Do the plans include design loads as required under the Uniform Building Code for roof snow loads, (a minimum of 40 pounds per square foot in Garfield County), floor loads and wind loa�df7 x'4r �rd.� c W ,SfL-mac. 6c.- ' �JwGS Yes N�/�- — W / [.� 1�C S ��. 8 Does the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor and roof construction? Yes iFie:a a✓ SQL (.06. eis+f6- 9. Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists, wall studs, ceiling joists, roof rafters or joists or trusses? Yes .t� WiLz �� sPec ,fr e 4� SQL rSt.�JG 10.4r6 . 10. Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method of positive connection of all columns and beams? Yes 4. /14- - kJ/ r.L �a �vr Ssc—c r,Gi.?sr9 d}, f E— 6c/ !sZfei-S 2 07/06/98 08:12 FAX 9709639003 TIMBERLINE ENG i 1. Does the plan indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the highest point of the building or addition measured at mid span between the ridge and the eave down to existing gradaurs? Yes l/ 12. Does the plan include any stove or zero clearance fireplace planned for installation including make and model and Colorado Phase certifications or phase II EPA certification? Yes No ✓✓ 13. Does the plan include a masonry fireplace including a fireplace section indicating design to comply with the Uniform Building Code Ch�pt f 37? Yes No ✓ 14. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that egress/rescue windows from sleeping rooms and/or basements comply with the requirements of the Uniform Building Code? Yes %�/� No 0/ 15. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that windows provide natural light and vim} ' ion for all habitable rooms? Yes /t/ /- No A /4 16. Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass doors, glazing immediately adjacent to such doors, glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as a walking surface; sliding glass doors, fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub enclosures and specify safety glazing for these areas? Yes /VA. No /4 17 Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces, boilers and water heaters indicated on the plan? Yes A/fr.- No •tiAt 18. Do you understand that if you are building on a parcel of land created by the exemption process or the subdivisio process, are building plans in compliance with all plat notes and/or covenants? Yes No 19, Do you understand that if you belong to a homeowners association, it is your responsibility to obtain written permission from the association, if required by that association, prior to submitting an application for a building permit? If you do not have written permission from the association, do you understand that the plan check fee will not be refunded should the architectural ttee deny or reject your building plans? Yes No 3 1003 07/06/98 08:12 FAX 9709639003 TIMBERLINE ENG IJ004 10. Will this be the o sidential structure on the parcel? Yes 21. Have two Yes No If no -Explain: eta sets of construction drawings been submitted with the application? 22. Is this an application for the placement of a ctured home? Yes No If yes, have you specified the size of the unit (min. 20ft. x 20ft.); live roof load (min. 40#); wind design (min. wind speed of 80 mph & 15 Ib. wind load); foundation design; method of anchoring? Yes 23. Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other construction co quirements? Yes No 24. Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a final inspectioarfield County Building Department? Yes No 25. Do you understand t pproval for design and/or construction changes are required prior to the appli . ' . , • these changes? Yes No 26. Do you understand that the Budding Department will collect a "Plan Review" fee from you at the time of application and that you will be required to pay the "Permit Fee" as well as any "School Impact" or "Septic System" fees required, at the time you pick up your building permit? % Yes ✓ No 27. Are you aware that twenty four (24) hour notice is required for all inspections? Inspections will be made from Battlement Mesa to West Glenwood in the mornings and from Glenwood Springs to Carbondale in the afternoon. Morning inspections must be caged in by 12:00 p.m. the day before; afternoon inspections must be called in by 5:00 p.m. the day before. Failure to give twenty four (24) hour notice for inspections will delay yoetion one (1) day. Inspections are to be called in to 945-9159. Yes ur ' No 28. Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the Uniform Building Code including approval on a final inspection griim to receiving a Certificate of Occupancypancy of the building? Yes / No 4 07/06/98 08:12 FAX 9709639003 TIMBERLINE ENG 29. Are you aware that the person signing the -Permit Application, whether the "Owner", "Agent of the Owner", "General Contractor", 'Contractor', or otherwise, is the party responsible for the project complying with the Uniform Building Code? Yes No 30. If you are accessing a county road and do net have an existing driveway you will need to acquire a driveway permit from Garfield County Road and Bridge. Their phone number is 945-6111. You will need to show proof prior to the issuance of the building permit. I hereby acknowledge that I have read, understand and answered these questions to the best of my ability. 74 Sat signature date Phone: 443 —/A (days); Project Name: L ---r% 6•art!„c fart 1.63 . b (evenings) S4�Z�1-c-�e Project Address: ' 64 tieLAW, Noses: If you have answered 'No" on any of the questions, you may be required to provide this information at the request of the Building Official prior to beginning the plan review process. Delays in issuing the permit are us be expected. Work may not proceed without the issuance of a permit. If it is determined by the Building Official that additional information is necessary to review the application and plans to determine minimum compliance with the adopted codes, the application may be placed behind more recent applications for building permits in the review process and not reviewed until taµirod information has been provided and the application rotates again to rust position for review, delay in issuance of the permit or delay in proceeding with oanstruction. Per App 02.95 Effective August 15, 1995 5 Roos 1 II TIMBERLINE ENGINEERING STRUCTURAL/CIVILSTRUCTURAL/CIVIL IEMGINEE LING • OGNII'RACr NG CERTIFIED ]ENERGY DESIGN PROFESSIONAL September 10, 1998 Garfield County Building Department Attn: Don Owens 109 86 Street, Suite 303 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Re: Eubank Mini -Storage 1676 CR 100 Carbondale, Colorado Dear Mr Owens; Attached are revised drawings C1 and C4 for the above project. These revisions show the change in Buildings P, Q, R being revised to a single building P. Also, I have reviewed the UBC regarding the requirement for 40 feet of clearance or 1 -hour walls between buildings M,N (warehouse) and G (mini -storage) within the same block. It appears that this is not a requirement, Could you please verify this. , J ,Cg4e5pji If you have any questions please call us at 970-963-9869. ("� Sincerely, TIMBERLINE ENGINEERING David A. Powell, PE P.O. OX 631 CARBONDAL1 , CO. 81623 PHONE 970 963 9869 / FAX 970 963 9003 FIRE • EMS • RESCUE May 12, 2001 Arno Ehlers Building Official, Garfield County 109 Eighth Street, Suite 303 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 RE: Eubank - Carbondale Mini -Storage, Building P, High Pile Storage Dear Arno: RECEIVED MAY 1 5 2001 1 have reviewed the drawings for the proposed Eubank - Carbondale Mini -Storage, Building P. The building is proposed is to be used for 12,000 square feet of high pile storage. The proposed high pile storage will consist Class 111 commodities in 7' x 5' x 7'-6" wood crates stacked three high to a maximum of 22'-6". I reviewed the drawings for compliance with the Uniform Fire Code (UFC), specifically Article 81 — High Pile Combustible Storage along with other applicable national standards. 1 would offer the following comments: I . The proposed drawings comply with UFC Article 81. 2. The automatic fire detection system drawings should be submitted for approval prior to installation. Installation shall be in accordance with NFPA 72 - National Fire Alarm Code. 3. Standpipe drawings should be submitted for approval prior to installation. 4. The fire pump drawings should be submitted for approval prior to installation. The pump shall be installed in accordance with NFPA 20, Standard for the Installation of Stationary Pumps for Fire Protection, 1999 edition. Acceptance testing, performance and maintenance to be per NFPA 20, Chapter 11. Please contact me if you have any questions or if 1 can be of any assistance. Sine el G ill Gavettc Deputy Chief Carbondale & Rural Fire Protection District 300 Meadowood Drive • Carbondale, CO 81623.9701963-2491 Fax 963-0569 Oct e3 01.*10:25a Timberline Engineerin6 • ed p If 1 �i• 1 97D 963 8003 p.5 Oat ?3 011.10:26e Timberline Engineering 970 963 9003 p.6 SMISIOSIJNE ENG 002 GARFIELD COUNTY WILDING PERMIT APPLICATION PSIS 7)11 oaillilE3l,COUSrr(m,10IWOM491N0/1CO JOWIvo vosmiummeriessigniemlirommosir. MOM NO. 6911 PARCEL/8NO ►mu. mu.ys. 04411. La -G. imam ow wept. f simmermacromenel 417 Raves keit e.:24-44- 379 -rete Was -. ------ IFOINFAINIPM ossamilsos ISatu s 31 1y, G7S t'- yli masziapra ..R INFOS afiruccomegiammuloolit (� C'F(C s. NOME RAM R r Ieo punier ■ mow MM wt w: awns WV TOO MIX OF aiFsIDO it NOW Mao VolD 1F OW. CODBOMIDIR MOD=a �� OP DOM Fr CCIFOIDOWOOFFOR OULU TOINOMOICOMAMMON=FORANUMCOINDAVI*WANDT mtwoatamiaow= MIT Ozer NM TM TAM TO MI � COM llIADAN) IMODR.At . llONpo CD sUm mellbalOmA IMF OR 110F. TIM OROWITIP3 atit 7�IQ tiCOA Wit JPRIIIUME TO MVO IIIMILUTIOvIXAZIeRaNia<7111ilohrIEDIMMWTt PTA= OD �� a 1130100uDOZ at EFSF V". saw ifOooK Oftworwebelodigookoes Nod slow no as- ,e 7.71 aSG1.1 S 74:444 M4wyO4th..rsnO. siJgrc�aRt� 2oC137.2S 4-34-4(D 44414- �zly�l /It ` (214,113if3,)l Y rALwgeg , _- - Awat,ti.wrartma erimmobb S/ i coeterM& A/ DOIOb. &Mt MOOD 7I AMU= 1p� Yawe=toTeaAMUAll X10AIONCIR. ICI MOWOIFIDIOOPORACOVILOP. OMR ToCORYfuncTslMs7Wans: .aTDCKI MO ADO OFICNICATICW111 MOM= TC1 REVZIDO n77111ptmAN.011DO1s1ODR. INSOSOOXRITLIDZIDANTIOALMOirtAX10NOn= Mftt+MOORM KRUMlit =WMMinn' MOMTOboboLTMULL UMW, COCOJgpLOmUIL ADOM) 11.11.3 WOW OFtl4Mfit�L]EeAlL3�OaAf��imRl /ARM 18RTD�1IAMB Mai J1*R1OTld rrJwoC°°KaO°CIDIDAND ascr�,uov�mcr�mal�o� n�MOOT ,�Fw�aNsw IDIsovINIAu,iaa■1waa.Ataroaa. IICI-DOF OF MOOD DI UAW emu= aeA!l71NCTIA= taa9 MGM+a _CIONr4tmO MR DATA NUM wrnailemTar MIMS OMNI.MO 1101114Altnl • tRsvorm°seetaaessa.r>�ioaan=p—M re/DMOMaawtn OR c4twm intA>m netier eCele _C#mUCDOP 7�AftOR IMO 1IOT am pN r 1 ADLOlt'ANOR of 4 NisIDONI DIM= notiortr tJopessoart oroussna.gtm a w acersa .rwrws-,e...... D(F FC,IE4,1C Dvi4-1 Sr" Id). c.)0 X1.75 C.r't, ,P -e Gq (0 7oTM L OL/ c4 cid -6 //ill Erzte p‘,71/. cf A.3P ,/ sir /;GAQG P /5406 sa_ 1106- e--ig/19b, lupe- tA4velou. l .11 b aks O Fri ofrAxe Ht P 1e — u s.oa gyp, Dock.- 1 ra-r a I daS i 31;;71- 13e /PC 1;;7s 'gP/PC fAIL, C& 6311)c .0p= SI 6.o olS54.S6.as S! = 3P8131- 5./3/0?3 tG.s- a 130 l qB3- 10-17-6-r = S Yo r PG - l AI l ", lrlt r- sYb '321 g q G ` B6 /0/I!/l, s , 9'4'$S - CA-Q-eo >t/386 (- ('z3/1 C rn 14 ii Svc/1?OM �' Old pi 4 plilof ic ( tt4AAA. ,t. afewv)ept_1,2 rex C /vocrt� Yier;y1 C --- 13abka 1)ci- oaaei 4 a' MAtiq /9//i/oI a Z 0. 0 a N 0) L D L!J 1- 0 Z (continue on back) T li I of % Q c E a.-..c aar a 0 A .1 U . iri d ijr.2 co) 71' d OI _o ) la Q 0 �.. vs N c C N O) Ia w c ra d 1 1 o.0 O N ▪ O O a d G 0 N O L- o� -) 0 0 co ,� V1 LL f'} .... . ❑ :j ti 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 635282 08/28/2003 04:33P B1512 P499 M RLSDORF 1,of 3 R 0.00 D 0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO r8 D R RESOLUTION NO. 1 (SERIES QF 2003) A RESOLUTION OF THE GARFIELD COUN'T'Y BOARD OF REVIEW DENYING AN APPEAL OF A DECISION OF THE GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO TERMINATE BUILDING PERMITS 6907 AND 6911, RELATING TO PROPERTY 1N GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO. WHEREAS, Dale Eubank, LLC, the owner of the property therein described, was granted building permits no. 6907 and 6911, for the construction ofstorage and warehouse buildings located at 1678 County Road 100, Carbondale, Garfield County, Colorado; and WHEREAS, Garfield County is a legal andpolitical subdivision of the State of Colorado, for which the Board of County Commissioners is authorized to act; and WHEREAS, pursuant to law, the Board of County Commissioners of Garfield County has adopted building codes for the public health, safety and welfare; and WHEREAS, the above referenced building permit applications were made at the time that the Uniform Building Code, 1994 Edition, was in full force and effect; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has appointed aBoard ofReview to review certainactions taken by the Garfield County Building Official, under the provisions of the Uniform Building Code; and WHEREAS, on June 10, 2003, Andrew Schwaller, acting in his capacity as the Building Official for Garfield County, determined that the building permits 6907 and 6911 hadcxpiredbecause he found that the work authorized by this permit had been either suspended or abandoned for a period of at least 180 days, as provided in Section 106.4.4 of the Uniform Building Code; and WHEREAS, the Garfield CountyBoard ofReview conducted apublic hearing on August 18, 2003; and WHEREAS, after full deliberation and consideration of the evidence and the testimony presented, the' Garfield County Board of Review affirmed the action of the Building Official and declared that the building permits have expired. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF REVIEW OF GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO: Baird of Review Resolution 1 August 26, 2603 r_; 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 535282 08/28/2003 04:33P 81512 P500 11 RLSDORI 2 of 3 R 0.00 D 0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY .CO Section 1. Findings ofFact: • 1. The request for review -was initiated by Dale Eubank, LLC by letter from its attorney, Larry Green, dated June 18, 2003. This letter seeks review of a decision made by the Building Official oa June 10, 2003, declaring that Building Permits 6907 and 6911 had expired. 2. Proper notice ofthe meeting was given to the applicant, and to the Building Official. 3. The medting before the Board of Review was extensive and complete, all pertinent facts, ;natters and issues were submitted and all interested parties were heard at that meeting, including the applicant, its counsel ofrecordandits consultant, the Building Official, and the County Attorney. 4. Based upon its independent analysis from the testimony presented of the progress made toward the completion of the storage and warehouse structures under the building permits referenced above, the Board of Review concludes that there has been no substantial work on the buildings in question, and that for at Least 180 days, the work has been either suspended or abandoned, according to the plain meaning of those terms, as they are incorporated in Section 106.4.4 of the 1994 Uniform Building Code. 5. This analysis conforms to the decision of the Building Official. 6. The applicanthas asked the Board ofReview to in some fashion modify the provisions in Section 106.4.4 of the Uniform Building Code, 1994, Edition, by adding language which would provide a more objective definition of the terms "suspended or abandoned." Neither the Board of Review, nor the Building Official, have the authority to do so. 7. • For the reasons set out above, the Board of Review concludes that the actions of the Building Official in declaring that the building permits referenced above have expired is affirmed, and determines that they are null and void as provided in Section 106.4.4 of the Uniform Building Code, 1994 Edition. Section 2. The Board of Review therefore denies the appeal filed by the applicant from the actions of the Building Official, and declares that the building permits referenced in this Resolution have expired, and become null and void. Section 3. This action shall not prejudice the rights of the applicant to apply for new building permits for structures to be located upon this property. Bond of Review Resolution ' Angst 26.2003 i . r • 11111E UM 111111 11111111111111 111111 111 1111 11111111 . 35282 08/28/2003 04:33P B1512 P501 M ALSDORF of 3 R 0.00 D 0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO rn Dated this 27 day of August, 2003, effective as of August 18, 2003. ATTEST: — 6s -a,„ Secretary to the B of Review STATE OF COLORADO COUNTY OF GARFIELD ) )ss. ) By: BOARD. OF REVIEW The undersigned duly appointed and acting Secretary to the Board ofReview hereby certifies that this is a true and accurate copy of a Resolution adopted by the Board of Review of Garfield County, Colorado, at a meeting held on the day and month stated therein. lloud or Review Raolatioa Secretary to the Board of Review 3 August 26, 2003