HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication- Permit•
--- COUNTY BU •- ND SANITATION
DEPARTMENT Permit NR.:_;, 3555
Assessor's'Parcel_P(o.. •
109 8th Street ,Suite 303
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601
Phone (303) 945-8212
INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL PERMIT
( PROPERTY
Owner's Name , `,A1RL% 10 (C�± jtT1)
(v� Present Address
This does not tonstitute
a building or use permit.
System Location
ISYSTEM DESIGN
Legal Description of Assessor's Parcel No
`-1 I iS. Phone % w,
X103, ouizac
Septi0 Tank Capacity (gallon)
r r
tion Rate (minutes/inch)
orptidn Area - See Attached
/Regilir(ed pA
v
1
Special Setback Require, ants:
/
Date
Number of Bedrooms (or other)
Inspector .. f.... " , ti. I!•
FINAL SYSTEM
Call for Inspection (2 ours notice) Before Covering Installation , ...ir v"s`"
APPROVAL (as installed)
1ys m Installer
S tic Tank Capacity
Septic Tank Manufacturer or Trade Name
Septic Tank Access within 8" of surface
Absorption Arita
Absorption Area Type and/or Manufacturer or Trade Name
Adequate compliance with County and State regulations/requirements
Other
Date
r
WV 1 1 200(Jwspector
RETAIN WITH RECEIPT RECORDS T CONSTRUCTION SITE
*CONDITIONS:
1. All installation must comply with all requirements of the Colorado State Board of Health Individual Sewage Disposal Systems Chapter
25, Article 10 C.R.S. 1973, Revised 1984.
2. This permit Is valid only for connection to structures which have fully complied with County zoning and building requirements. Con-
nection to or use with any dwelling or structures not approved by the Building and Zoning office shall automatically be a violation or a
requirement of the permit and cause for both legal action and revocation of the permit.
.+3. Any person who constructs,alters, or installs an individual sewage disposal system in a manner which involves a knowing and material
variation from the terms or specifications contained In the application of permit commits a Class I, Petty Offense ($500.00 fine -6
months In jail or both).
White - APPLICANT Yellow - DEPARTMENT
ENARTECH Inc. Consulting Engineers and Hydrologists
July 9, 2001
Mr. Mark Bean
Garfield County
109 Eighth Street, Suite 303
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
RE: Prehm Ranch Cabin ISDS
Dear Mark:
Enclosed is an ISDS application for the Prehm Ranch Cabin, along with a Site Plan, the
application fee, a Vicinity Map, Geotechnical Report and Design Calculations. Please give me
a call if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
ENARTECH, INC.
Peter Belau, P.E.
PB/jlw
Enclosure
cc: Jeff Nelson
Lou Moore
Rick Neiley (w/out encl.)
E-mail: peterb@enartech.com
COMMON\P1B2001\439-02_Ltr M Bean 070901
302 Eighth Street, Suite 325 P.O. Drawer 160 Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 (970) 945-2236 Fax (970) 945-2977 www.enarlech.com
JUN -6-2001 01:22P FROM:BLDGPLANGARCO 9703843470
TO:9P9452977 P:2/9
INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM APPLICATION
OWNER Mel ; n LCo I oro d', , L+oL % Pies Selau. , £lna.r+ecln , T nc •
ADDRESS Bot 160 6-lPnwcna( Sprlr.5s, CO 8/1bo2 PHONE t9'1 - 22-36
CONTRACTOR Acre, Eoa4V ✓ h9
ADDRESS PHONE R h3 -0377
PERMIT REQUEST FOR QQ NEW INSTALLATION ( ). ALTERATION ( ) REPAIR
Attach separate sheets or report showing entire area with respect to surrounding areas, topography of area, habitable
building, location of potable water wells, soil percolation test holes, soil profiles in test holes (See page 4).
LOCATION OF PROPOSED FACILITY.
Near what City of Town 1 m11 a 5o1A-414 of 6-I e n areo0t Sir':Size of Lot
Legal Description or Address i'. -o -F 6 � "'C Le Preserve Ai Pre n., Banc l�
WASTES TYPE: ( ) DWELLING (X) TRANSIENT USE
( ) COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL ( ) NON-DOMESTIC WASTES
( ) OTHER - DESCRIBE
BUILDING OR SERVICE TYPE: Recrea,,`on0.1 Co-b:n
Number of Bedrooms 0
( ) Garbage Grinder ( ) Automatic Washer
Number of Persons 0 - /0
( ) Dishwasher
SOURCE AND TYPE OF WATER SUPPLY: 0 WELL ( ) SPRING ( ) STREAM OR CREEK
If supplied by Community Water, give name of supplier.
DISTANCE TO NEAREST COMMUNITY SEWER SYSTEM: ( wd le
Was an effort made to connect to the Community System? No
A site plan is rewired to be submitted That indicates the following MINIMUM dbtances:
Leach Field to Well: 100 feet
Septic Tank to Well: 50 feet
Leach Field to Irrigation Ditches, Stream or Water Course: 50 feet
Septic System to Property Lines: 10 feet
YOUR INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PERMIT WILLNOT BE ISSUED WITHOUT
A SITE PLAN.
GROUND CONDITIONS:
Depth to first Ground Water Table 7 Teet
Percent Ground Slope 33%
2
JUN -6-2001 01:23P FROM:BLDGPLANGARCO 9703843470
1
TYPE OF INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PROPOSED:
(>el SEPTIC TANK ( ) AERATION PLANT
( ) VAULT PRIVY ( ) COMPOSTING TOILET (
( ) PIT PRIVY ( ) INCINERATION TOILET
TO:9P9452977 P:3/9
VAULT
RECYCLING, POTABLE USB
RECYCLING, OTHER USE
( ) CHEMICAL TOILET ( ) OTHER - DESCRIBE
FINAL DISPOSAL BY:
(>6 ABSORPTION TRENCH, BED OR NT ( ) EVAPOTRANSPIRATION
( ) UNDERGROUND DISPERSAL ( ) SAND FILTER
( ) ABOVE GROUND DISPERSAL ( ) WASTEWATER POND
( ) OTHER - DESCRIBE
WILL EFFLUENT BE DISCHARGED DIRECTLY INTO WATERS OF THE STATE? No
PERCOLATION TESTBESULTS: (To be completed by Registered Professional Engineer, if the Engineer does the
Percolation Test)
Minutes an
Minutes__ IS"
per inch in hole No. 1
per inch in hole No. 2
Minutes
Minutes
at/
per inch in hole NO. 3
ver inch in hole NO. _
Name, address and telephone of RPE who made soil absorption tests:
PIP ireo+ec-1,, SDa-O R.oa.cQ 15''1, 6-1ey&oo
Name, address and telephone of RPE responsible for design of the system:
rhC, P.O. Box 160 , G-Iev wfrooa
ie. -
Springs . co €r4oI
,
Vis. 00 8l%OI
Applicant acknowledges that the completeness of the application is conditional upon such further mandatory and
additional tests and reports as may be required by the local health department to be made and furnished by the applicant
or by the local health department for purposed of the evaluation of the application; and the issuance of the permit is
subject to such terms and conditions as deemed necessary to insure compliance with rules and regulations made,
information and reports submitted herewith and required to be submitted by the applicant are or will be represented to
be true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief and are designed to be relied on by the local department of
health in evaluating the same for purposes of issuing the permit applied for herein. I further understand that any
fitlsi6cation or misrepresentation may result in the denial of the application or revocation of any permit granted based
upon said application and in legal action for perjury as provided by law.
Signed
Date 7/9 79 I
PLEASE DRAW AN1 ACCURATE MAP TO YOUR PROPERTY,'
See. A o-cL C viGiN�T� Nie_e
3
GecPtech
April 30, 2001
Marlin (Colorado) Ltd.
Attn: Ton Lawson
c/o Carl Linnecke
215 South Monarch #101
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Prrrtm .f MAY 0 I vM
Rept orth•Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc.
5020 County Road 154
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601
Phone: 970.945-7988
Fax: 970.945.8454
hpgeo@hpgeotech.com
Job No. 101 147
Subject: Observation of Backhoe Pits and Percolation Test, Proposed Fishing
Cabin, Lot 2, Prelim Ranch, Garfield County, Colorado
Dear Mr. Lawson:
As requested, Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. observed backhoe pits for design of
foundations and conducted percolation testing for septic disposal design at the subject
site. The study was conducted as requested by Peter Belau and as an addendum to our
preliminary geotechnical study for the Prelim Ranch development, report dated April
18, 2001, Job No. 101 147. The data obtained and our recommendations based on the
proposed construction and subsurface conditions encountered are presented in this
report.
Proposed Construction: The proposed cabin will be a one story wood frame structure
located next to the Roaring Fork River on Lot 2 as shown on Fig. 1. Ground floor will
be slab -on -grade. Cut depths are expected to be up to about 3 feet. Foundation
loadings for this type of construction are assumed to be relatively light and typical of
the proposed type of construction.
If building conditions or foundation loadings are significantly different from those
described above, we should be notified to re-evaluate the recommendations presented in
this report.
Site Conditions: The site is.a flat terrace located on the western bank of the Roaring
Fork River. Lot 2 residence building site is located to the southwest of the cabin site.
The grade is gentle down to the northeast. The septic disposal area is located to the
southwest of the cabin site and a few feet higher. Vegetation consists of grass, weeds,
scattered cottonwood, pinon pines and scrub oak trees. Numerous cobbles and small
boulders are exposed on the ground surface.
Subsurface Conditions: The subsurface conditions at the site were evaluated by
observing three exploratory pits excavated prior to our site visit at the approximate
locations shown on Fig. 1. The subsoils encountered, below about 1 foot of topsoil,
Marlin (Colorado) Ltd.
April 30, 2001
Page 2
consist of nil to 31/2 feet of very silty sand overlying relatively dense, silty sandy gravel
with cobbles and boulders. The logs of the pits are presented below.
Pit No. Topsoil Silty . Depth of Total Pit Depth
(ft) Sand Gravel (ft)
(ft) (ft)
1 1 1-41 41 -7 7
2 1 1-21 21 -4 4
3 1 - 1 - 31 31
Results of a gradation analysis performed on a bulk sample of the sandy gravel with
cobbles (minus 5 inch fraction) obtained from the site are presented on Fig. 2. A
consolidation test performed on a sample of very silty sand, shown on Fig.3 indicates
moderate compressibility potential when loaded and wetted. Free water was not
observed in the pits at the time of our field work and the soils were moist.
Foundation Recommendations: Considering the subsoil conditions observed in the
exploratory pits and the nature of the proposed construction, we recommend spread
footings placed on the undisturbed natural soils or compacted structural fill designed for
an allowable soil bearing pressure of 2,000 psf for support of the proposed cabin. The
excavation should be kept relatively shallow to prevent possible construction below the
groundwater level. Footings should be a minimum width of 16 inches for continuous
walls and 2 feet for columns. The topsoil and loose disturbed soils encountered at the
foundation bearing level within the excavation should be removed and the footing
bearing level extended down to the natural silty sand or gravel soils. Structural fill used
to re-establish bearing level should consist of coarse granular soils compacted to at least
9896 of standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. The fill should
extend beyondthe edges of the footings a distance equal to at least the fill depth below
the footing. Exterior footings should be provided with adequate cover above their
bearing elevations for frost protection. Placement of footings at least 36 inches below
the exterior grade is typically used in this area. Continuous foundation walls should be
reinforced top and bottom to span local anomalies such as by assuming an unsupported
length of at least 12 feet.
Floor Slabs: The natural on-site soils, exclusive of topsoil, and compacted structural
fill can be used to support lightly loaded slab -on -grade construction. To reduce the
effects of some differential movement, floor slabs should be separated from all bearing
walls and columns with expansion joints which allow unrestrained vertical movement.
H•P GEOTECH
Marlin (Colorado) Ltd.
April 30, 2001
Page 3
Floor slab control joints should be used to reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking.
The requirements for joint spacing and slab reinforcement should be established by the
designer based on experience and the intended slab use. A minimum 4 inch layer of
free -draining gravel should be placed beneath interior floor slabs to facilitate drainage.
This material should consist of minus 2 inch aggregate with less than 50% passing the
No. 4 sieve and less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve.
All fill materials for support of floor slabs should be compacted to at least 95% of
maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Required fill
can consist of the on-site soils devoid of vegetation, topsoil and oversized rock.
Surface Drainage: The following drainage precautions should be observed during
construction and maintained at all times after the cabin has been completed:
1) Inundation of the foundation excavations and underslab areas should be
avoided during construction.
2) Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and
compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density in
pavement and slab areas and to at least 90% of the maximum standard
Proctor density in landscape areas.
3) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be
sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions. We
recommend a minimum slope of 6 inches in the first 10 feet in unpaved
areas and a minimum slope of 3 inches in the first 10 feet in pavement
and walkway areas.
4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of
all backfill.
Percolation Testing: Percolation tests were conducted on April 25, 2001 to evaluate the
feasibility of an infiltration septic disposal system at the site. The profile pit (Pit 1) and
three percolation holes were dug at the locations shown on Fig. 1. The test holes
(nominal 12 inch diameter by 12 inch deep) were hand dug and soaked with water one
day prior to testing. The soils exposed in the percolation holes are similar to those
exposed in the profile pit and consist of silty sand below about 1 foot of topsoil. The
percolation test results are presented in Table I. Based on the subsurface conditions
encountered and the percolation test results, the tested area should be suitable for an
infiltration septic disposal system. We understand that a mounded system will be used
and will be designed by Enartech.
H -P GEOTECH
Marlin (Colorado) Ltd.
April 30, 2001
Page 4
Limitations: This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted
geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no
warranty either expressed or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted
in this report are based upon the data obtained from the exploratory pits located as
shown on Fig. 1 and to the depths indicated in the report, the proposed type of
construction, and our experience in the area. Our findings include interpolation and
extrapolation of the subsurface conditions identified at the exploratory pits and
variations in the subsurface conditions may not become evident until excavation is
performed. If conditions encountered during construction appear different from those
described in this report, we should be notified at once so re-evaluation of the
recommendations may be made.
This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes.
We are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. As
the project evolves, we should provide continued consultation and field services during
construction to review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations, and to
verify that the recommendations have been appropriately interpreted. Significant design
changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommendations
presented herein. We recommend on-site observation of excavations and foundation
bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a representative of the geotechnical
engineer.
If you have any questions or if we may be of further assistance, please let us know.
Sincerely,
HEPWORTH - PAWLAK _. - LAICAL, INC.
Steven L. Pawlak, P
Reviewed by:
tnei• :
Daniel E. Hardin, P.E.
SLP/ksw
attachments
cc: Enartech - Attn: Peter Belau.
H -P GEOTECH
ROAR/NO FORK RIPER
1
LOT 1
LOT -'
BOUNDARIES
PIT 3
LOT 2
PIT 1
(PROLE PIT)
Q IN QP 1
P 3 �2
APPROXIMATE SCALE
1" = 20'
101 147
HEPWORTH-PAWLAK
GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY PITS
AND PERCOLATION TEST HOLES
Fig. 1
•
IIIanarannx ANALYSIS save Ww.Yss
,.E
acs us STN # o I
CLEAR MARS arasaa
24 IR 7 M
0 45 1414. IS M1. SOUR MIL • MIL 11101.
10
m
30
M
I- 50
61
0. so
70
10
S0
100
SOWN
SS• INNS=
NIS
*WS SW
Sal sw
SON SI
ASA
MS SS!
Ass s
OSMAN
SWIM
SEM SI=
SO= SW
00 p3
3M - 3/4' 1 1/T r rr r
SI SP
S SW
S SE
S SIS
IS SE OWE VMS
=II SI
SE SW
SE
SI SSW
ISWI• SIS
S MI SS SWII
OWE SIO•
SN
/IMMENSE.' SI SO
IWO
Wan Ir
SW SSW
S SI =NEWMANN SUE=
S AWN =NI NS
SSW SWE
SEEM= IS S SAME
IWNENW
0
SS SI
INININWE
SWIMS
20
50
70
OWN ES
SAO WWIS
SOW
WS AND NNW=
S ----
In SSW
SS S
WEN
.ao1 .a02 AM .001 .010 .037 £74 .150
.300 .000 1.15 2.30 4.75 11.512.5 »A
DIAMETER OF PARTICLES IN MILOMETERS
NOISES
37.5 702 1152 203
a.AY 10 aT 1 .INE 1 MAI !COARSE I FIE Cr ODA= 1 testa
GRAVEL 79 R
SAND 19 R SILT AND CLAY 2 R
LIQUID OMIT R PLASTICITY INDEX R
SAMPLE OF: Sandy Gravel with Cobbles FROM: Pit 1 at 5 thru 7 Feet
101 147
HEPWORTH-PAWLAK
GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
GRADATION TEST RESULTS
40
ao
3
10
0
Fig. 2
Moisture Content = 25.3 percent
Dry Density = 95 pcf
—200 = 49 percent
Sample of: Very Silty Sand
From: Pit 2 at 1.5 Feet
0
—No movement
M
1
upon
wetting
mq� 2
•4
C
a
3
u
4
•
0.1 1.0 0 100
APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf
101 147
HEPWORTH-PAWLAK
GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS
Fig. 3
HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
TABLE I
PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS
JOB NO. 101 147
HOLE NO.
HOLE DEPTH
(INCHES)
LENGTH OF
INTERVAL
(MIN)
WATER DEPTH
AT START OF
INTERVAL
(INCHES)
WATER DEPTH
AT END OF
INTERVAL
' (INCHES)
DROP IN
WATER
LEVEL
(INCHES)
AVERAGE
PERCOLATION
RATE
(MIN./INCH)
P-1
19
16
refill
9K
6°
2'
6%
6
1%
5
4
1
9 Y
734
2 1.
7%
6%
1Y
20
5%
5Y
14
6K
4X
Y
4 1
3 34
34
P-2
23
15
refill
11 34
8
3 '%
15
8
6
2
8
414
1%
11
8 °
2 14
8Y
714
11:
7Y4
6
134
a
4Y
114
4%
4
%
P-3
21
15
10
81
1 Y4
24
8 Y.
7
1 %
7
5%
114
refill
10
8 %
1 Y4
8 14
7 14
1
7Y4
6Y
Y
654
6
i
6
6 14
%
Note: The percolation holes were hand dug and soaked on April 24, 2001. The percolation tests
were performed on April 25. The average percolation rate is based on the last two
reading of each test.
• , TRAMWAY ENGINEERING
302 Eighth Street, Suite 325
P.O. Drawer 160
GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81602
(970) 945.2236 FAX 945-2977
JOB a -s t-, 1 \ R Cfre )1\J
SHEET NO ( OF �---
CALCULATED BY DATE 7- 9-ot
CHECKED BY DATE
SCALE
15 05 ,DgSIcyto C13lx-UL,9T(0vQS.
Disibt4 Flow = (Jo P sers)(253 0t
(i ,S rak) = "75- 9rid
PrV &t.. Solt- P /uQc. A-r!oN__ _ R.ATE- = a o $4. k" f /i hd^,
RQUw SOIL_ /I rioN &,w1= 379Eao/5 33S sd.ft,.
12 Qv'RED SAND F\ A.F.421 = 3n5/0195- LT&e. = 395- fi-.
DgslGr4 SSD _IA la'$ 33
396 sg; ft,
RFQ 01 Rs9$EQrc . T4J.L \/oLuME= = 375- 30' s/ay hr 53 v-zthci9j
Selor,c Tjc t. JMh - 750 50..110,,S
KOZOIof wa,V IMi MOM)
ENARTECH,INC.
302 Eighth Street, Suite 325
P.O. Drawer 160
GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81602
(970) 945.2236 FAX 945.2977
JOB
192,14? -1 01--f; i N
SHEET NO OF
CALCULATED BY
CHECKED BY DATE
SCALE
DATE
7-9-0)
flQSllt(r- ,DF5i 6-N cftc uLn-T /pH S
Desi&, \CLow " 375 5 Poo
&F Rece- - ^lesit Dos:.
ODse. = /L-/ 00. 110--,c
Dark /
q co
1- 0(,
lr usw-c. ' c4 ofosQ.S�o�cc�
icAt_c\ fi•e-ge �olo,�Q ��}%� 2S Teel
Lot 2 0 s Dr — I /2.-- ihoes
k -o le -
Ha IQ -
N. ;nck
0Q.,,,Tu`(� Oi• a �
3 -(^4—
I'/2- inch ( bwsa.(-
Le I e
I. O 7.Oo t of e ;Lo
pa5106- rOMr .DC516-0
/00 - 1''Fi & F"wOQ j;-c.r.ve ; )O,./ = s 55
(loUNp 9t TM►°(PC_ SSSa.s
tAi r „,Z, IN 1705/rJc irriIC f' c.. v = 50 LI 3,5
EI-C/io LASS (N 100 ' of 1 yc' CIC P7 2-55 Pel = y ft
\-rf"e17 1-0 i THS PJ PI 12 E LFA -Fle— L S f
TDH(52.5-43,5) + 3 4 1 - 15 PONP = SNt=f ,2
(25)r- e is5a0
PROMO 20,.,,5x,. 5—,206-11900e,
1
Michael Doyle
A rchite.cfs
trilirgatra
970-700-1413 p
1 �/►.�ev./v
vao
•
egdorchigsoprls.ner
D -G
TABLE I
. QUANTITIES AND BOD STRENGTH OF SEWAGE
FOR VARIOUS TYPES OF USES
TYPE OF ESTABLISHMENT
GALLONS/PERSON/DAY
(AVERAGE)
(UNLESS OTHERWISE
STATED)
LBS.
BODS/PERSON/DAY
(UNLESS OTHERWISE
STATED)
Residential
Single-family dwellings_,_
(two people per bedroom)
75
.20
Separate Distribution of
Flows - Individual
Residential use
Bath/Shower
14.7
.014
Dishwasher
1.8
.002
Kitchen sink
4.4
.045
Additional for garbage
grinder
1.4
.052
Laundry washer
19.5
.037
Lavatory
8.4
.021
Water closet
24.8
.029
Hotels and Motels - per room
(without private baths)
50
.15
Hotels and Motels - per room
(with private baths)
75
.15
Multiple -family dwellings or
apartments
75
.20
Boarding and Rooming houses
50
.15
Mobile Home Parks
75
.20
(per space)
300
.80
Commercial
Airports (per passenger)
5
.02
(per employee)
10
.06
Barber and Beauty Shops
(per chair)
100
.70*
Bowling Alleys
(per lane - toilet wastes
only)
5
.03*
Bus Service Areas
(not including food)
5
.02
Country clubs
(per member)
30
.02
(per employee)
20
.06.
bentist offices
(per non -wet chair)
50
.14*
• 19
•
Nursing Homes (per bed space)
100
.17
Schools, Boarding
100
.17
Schools, Day
(without cafeteria, gym
or showers)
15
.04
(with cafeterias, no gym
or showers
20
.08
(with cafeterias, gym and
showers)
25
.10
(additional for school
workers)
15
.06
Recreational and Seasonal
Camps, day (no meal served)
15
.12
Luxury Resort
125
.17
Resort (night and day)
50
.12
Campground (seasonal
occupancy - per unit)**
50
.12
Public Park (during hours
when park is open)
- Flush Toilet
(per fixture per hour)
36
.04 lbs./ fixture
-Urinal
(per fixture per hour)
10
.01 lbs./fixture
-Shower.
(per fixture per hour)
100
.10 lbs./ fixture
-Faucet
(per fixture per hour)
15
.04 lbs./ fixture
Swimming pools and bathhouses
10
.06
Travel trailer parks
(with individual water
and sewage hookup - per
unit) **
50
.12
(without individual water
and sewage hookup - per
unit) **
50
.12
* = BOD Levels needing further verification
** = Laundry facilities are to be calculated on a per
commercial washer basis in accordance with other elements
of this table.
21
EPA 625/1-80-012
DESIGN MANUAL
ONSITE WASTEWATER TREATMENT
AND DISPOSAL SYSTEMS
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Office of Water Program Operations
Office of Research and Development
Municipal Environmental Research Laboratory
October 1980
•
FIGURE 7-30
NOMOGRAPH FOR DETERMINING THE MINIMUM DOSE VOLUME FOR A GIVEN LATERAL DIAMETER,
LATERAL LENGTH, AND NUMBER OF LATERALS
- 4.000
3.500
• 3.000
. 2.500
. 2.000
EXAMPLE 7-3 2
• 1.500 / \\
10
/ \
-1000 EXAMPLE7.2 / \\ 15
• 900 i/ \\ 20
20
`800 -- -
• 700 C 15 / >/ 4 -- 30 J
-500 J / / �i ` o\Q
500 10 R �i 5 0+ 50 W ...
▪ 45000 2 -' 6 W I-
- \\ `` ��
f
. 350 15 7J \\
4
LI-
\
• 300 / 8 > \
/ 3 , 9 W \
▪ 250 O.
'/ / 2 101& 1Y,
• 200
e / 2
/
- 150 /
/ 15
2
/
287
1
LATERAL DIAMETER, inches
FIGURE 7-28
N >
C J
FW- 0
d
—
0
0 a
Lai 0
N
J
0
M C
cc o
C v
C
LL
N
C
1-
dF'
O
W
a.
6
6
J
0
N
ce(y
W
285
O N a) N
O U ~ L
O t
O 'C U m
U L
A
L N '. ; •-
• p0
O 07
45 T. 0.04.
E Ed a c
O L L a) 0)
U N °)~
O 8 7 2 a
"- OL„ a
y C L fN y
v, .4 ~ a)
y d -
• Q
�- C
O • I-.~ m co C
O a 3 a)
0)a) - L) 9
.0 9 C y
a3 H t
a7
o
a m •
E�
o a tt 0)
• 0 EN .r
N @ C L O)2
jtH Of V
> 0) N
C a7 `O OC
01 w°
C O) y
O E� d ° �
N d C O y
03 N 0) N 0)
Ta a .-U- ,a 3 0)
0) U 0 7 ~O
°yEo)C
aL ( C U
E 5 E a) a
OI° t?F3O
•CN _i .:N
- L
c/0 W
:
'-
8
e
N N
c
to
e
z
E
CO .-
5
a
d
N
O
N
N
d
M
t
G
x
=N
M
N
.E~.
V7:
—
0) 10
in
r
v
y
x
N
i5
N
N
O
=
N
��
0)
Z
F
a
z
f0
W
N
N
E
If)
4
-2
r
'ry
Q
co
G
c
G
Q
M
a)
0
d
M
W
_
=
N
N
`
t
\
a)
:
O
'-
E .-
m
•
0
ra
2c
o
r)
M
N
••
o
=
=
N
C
N
M
—
N
n
0)
=
N
Q)a
d
a)
m iin
w
is
r
_ 0.
E
@
et
co .- W
O
d
M
.�
O
M
=
N
N
(11)
y16uai leie1ei
p. 1n
.-
O N
N
M
M
in d a
IS
285
O N a) N
O U ~ L
O t
O 'C U m
U L
A
L N '. ; •-
• p0
O 07
45 T. 0.04.
E Ed a c
O L L a) 0)
U N °)~
O 8 7 2 a
"- OL„ a
y C L fN y
v, .4 ~ a)
y d -
• Q
�- C
O • I-.~ m co C
O a 3 a)
0)a) - L) 9
.0 9 C y
a3 H t
a7
o
a m •
E�
o a tt 0)
• 0 EN .r
N @ C L O)2
jtH Of V
> 0) N
C a7 `O OC
01 w°
C O) y
O E� d ° �
N d C O y
03 N 0) N 0)
Ta a .-U- ,a 3 0)
0) U 0 7 ~O
°yEo)C
aL ( C U
E 5 E a) a
OI° t?F3O
FIGURE 7-29
J
C
Won`
J
= O
N d
0a
= 6)
w.
0
0 d
aL
M CC
=Q
og
0<
s8i
N
W O
{1—
Q K
w
O f—
_/
0
w Q
O
O
OC
cc
w
W
W
0
G
J
0
u_
Z
@Q
G
3 y o. plopum Pu3
^O N IMI T I Cr;0
I Manifold Length (ft)
50 I
�
�
a
>
10
W
N
it
N
CO•
_
CD
c
s
f0 0.
m
N
,
M
_
o
o v
.7.
-
a
a
o
n
CO m
N
i
M
m
O
in
m
•
m
n
3I Manifold
m
m
s
i VI
CNI
s
L.
to
om
m
m
_E
m
G
1 n2
.
als with Ceni
s
m i.
-
m
i
=
N
n
25 1 30
1 Number of Later,
'F
T
O m
s
_o
i
m
N
n
•
"
o
r
.Z
E
•
,
m
N
A
•
i
iV
a -
a..-
m
o
i
M •
m
71
r
N
, =
!V
M 1 V m
44
1 ` i
`'
N M
•
..va
N
a "
2
.z
E .s m
m.Nl
°
r
X iw
m
W M
rkl
•
.1
,Wit
Ait .L n
.....
E
o
.52 rn
LL 1
ID.
45:6N
u)
44.
0
u7
N
PlojlueW Ie.nue3
286
3
d
O
p0)
d O
y .81e d
O
E rnd ael-
O C O
O d O
O L
w
N C
7 +
a E ; x
O S O
c
o.Et'c
x co
CO is C C
E Eg'
L
E~ -o
g 12
— 1)
1
Hvv a
10 N 3
x E ; o
= ; C
O) q
C tope ''
cc) IIS i
co
edes
•
V N 2731
E lon d
2 le w To
a y Olt y
L W D
w A o .
W d N
E o X 3 c
Uz �.0L
m
Jai
10
•
r •• •
h'Phd A9pS'
SHEF2S
Ovals
bI4GPM (LIVs/
Hoods
to24h(7.9m)
tlortrkd
11SI) G 1AFIA. NW
Ms
1/4 HPs�rededpots w/Ihssdwaked
1550 RPM
Maim Recamnxded
Unpin • 119451W
Automatic 0pwalai
YM. nil Poe Md
Mmerioh of (wham
OIs 30 cast Iron and xpbwed them**
Smiler
Thermo**
roan
Diuhorpe She
1.1{2' NP1131.In00)
SMshadhq
¥4 119.1 man)
Prewar
Kr SR
Srpeda Ieolus
• (arbon/Gran c awdwdcal sed
• 01 Md nota w/Mwiwk reset them! sndoad
• Use siphrow Idbbrkpcomma
• FO0y-od phq wodeblehr easy aoilenaw
Ind rephcanun
12— 40
9
6
3
— 30
a
220
X10
0— 0
Capacity -U.S. G.P.M.
Liters/Second 0
SHEF33
SHEF25
10 20
30
2
40
3
Typical Arps•'
SHEF33
MO Hood Bun and Wm**
Crofts
Io 33 GPM (2.1 Vs)
Nisi
b370111.901
Sabi
11SO It, 10.1183, nth
2301(1. ssak Meth
Morar
1/3 HPAsk pelt w/Ywrmdersbad
RPM
poodknlSSO
Miimw Retuwdd
Sump DSS
SOrplm • 11' (457m0)
Duplex •30'1712aw)
Amo&Operatm
Single loth wirh(mongol available)
11 orMMofarartwim
doss 30tadIre
bpalw
tut
Dkdwpe Stu
1.1/2' lwal
sans*,
3/P I tl wn)
Pour
10', 5710((30'
float)
Superior knurls
• (shac&Gramdc modwkcd sod
• 01 Md moor Wotan* not shad
uarlaad for.wrbmm proration
• Idhalm =M Nae
• rebodcplug aohblelassywoMonaw
ed raphcmms
• Paan Irk deslprr for baler mods
y,
• Refer to your authorized loon Hydmmatic'" Dlst i utor, Representative or fl beam for other applications.
May 01 02 02:56p Deckard Sales / Lou Moore 970-704-1874
Mar -15-02 1249t
March 11, 2002
970 946-2977
ENARTECH Inc. Consulting Enginesrs and Hydrologists
Mr. Mark Bean
Garfield County
109 Eighth Street, Suite 303
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
-.141111111111111....
'r
p.1
P .O2
Ilitteo,AY o 1 2082
RE: Prehm Ranch River Cabin ISDS
Dear Mark:
This letter is to certify that the individual sewage disposal system for the Prelim Ranch River
Cabin has been installed in accordance with the construction plans and specifications.
Sincerely,
ENARJECN, 1NC.
Peter Belau, P.E.
PBlkrz
cc: Tony Lawson
Lou Moore
Bob Jacobson
Rick Nciley
&mail: pelerbOcnanech.cOM
COMMON141R2Y11 ,.4794r! Le M Baur )1102
302 Eighth Street, Sure 328 P.O. Donner 160 Graawoed Swinge, CO81602 070)045.&36 FAR (970) 545-2977 www.anOr70ch.COm