Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication- PermitJob Address No. 6069 GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING, SANITATION and PLANNWG DEPARTMENT 109 8th Street Suite 303 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 (303) 945-8212 256 Battlement Creek Trail, Battlement Creek Village, Battlement Mesa Nature of Work Use of Building Owner Building Permit Single Family Dwelling w/Double Garage Randy & Claire Spence Contractor Witt Homes Amount of Permit $ 1,917.71 Permit: 1,162.25 Plan : 755.46 Date September 12, 1996 S. Archuleta Clerk BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO Applicant to complete numbered spaces only. PERMIT NO. flp rp 9 PARCEUSCHED NO. 570 JOB ADf1RESS 256 Battlement Cr. Tr. 1 LEGAL DESCR, LOT No. 4 BLOCK 2 SUBDI 3 OWNER Dandy & claire Seri? CONTRACTOR witt Hanes 4 5 ARCHITECT OR DESIGNER ri: ENGINEER ADDRESSTALIEL6 $ ADDRESS 1709 ADDRESS 2lr 7 ADDRESS 6 S.F OF BUILDING 2,160 S.FOFLOT 33,4 7 USE OF BUILDING 1t?SIC enriF11 8 CLASS OF WORK: GREW ❑ADDITION °ALTERATION ❑REPAIR °MOVE o DESCRIBE WORK: old n barn 10 GARAGE SINGLE ( DOUBLE CARPORT SINGLE DRIVEWAY PERMlT�-4-)1 -red riON SITE SEWAGE DISPOSAL PERMIT 11 VALUATION OF WORX: $ SPECIAL CONDITIONS: ADJUSTED VACS'$I51. ?..c./ NOTICE SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR ELECTRICAL. PLUMBING, HEATING, VENTILATING OR AIR CONDITIONING. THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 180 DAYS, OR IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 180 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR •.T. THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORI TO OLATE CEL THE PROVISIONS ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL REGU Ihj� 0 TR TION OR FARFORMANCE OF op IIII �! {Dat // 3b 6 ay/n Signature of er, Contractor or authorized agent heat an de , : n• ic= .... Building Departrnera Approva/ le / 7f Planning DepartmentAp. •validate CONST 01171 i Li • 1ic.v av 'ITSIION Battlement Cr. Village occi a D ',,�.;' 818- pl♦,7f-Y] L� ']yf1 WK, PH ..]1Lr 697- + $Ck b ite W 81.35 PI2,875. !. LICENSE NO. ,_ 50m� R1 1 PH 2.45-1N4 LICENSE NO, II PH. 'I LICENSE LICENSE NO. 12 HEIGHT 17 t NO. OF FLOORS 1 tEMOVE DOUBLE SITE PLAN attached ' PLAN CHECK FEE 7 756; SCHOOL IMPACT FEE / ,'FIFq �f 4iii4 NO. OFF BUILDINGS PARCEL PERMIT), ON / 4 , 2 USE OF BUILDINGS PARCEL /- NOW ON TOTAL Fl},gi 7. 7! WATER SUPPLY OCC. GR. DATE PERMIT ISSUED ! CONST. TYPE -/a 545, ' SPECIAL APPROVALS REQUIRED RECEIVED NOT REQUIRED ZONING -f-- -- HEALTH DEPT. FIRE DEPT. SOIL REPORT 1/ SETBACKS FLOOD HAZARD MANUF. HOME OTHER PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO THE APPLICANT AS OWNAGREEMENT ER, CONTRACTOR AND/QR THE AGENT OF THE CONTRACTOR OR OWNER TO CONSTRUCT THE STRUCTURE AS DETAILED ON PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SUBMITTED TO AND REVIEWED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT IN CONSIDERATION OF THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT THE SIGNER HEREBY AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL BUILDING CODES AND LAND USE REGULATIONS ADOPTED BY GARFIELD COUNTY PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GIVEN IN 30.26.201 CRS AS AMENDED. THE SIGNER FURTHER GREES THAT IF THE ABOVE SAID ORDINANCES ARE NOT FULLY COMPLIED WITH IN THE LOCATION, ERECTION, CONSTRUCTION AND USE OF HE ABOVE DESCRIBED STRUCTURE. THE PERMIT MAY THEN BE REVOKED BY NOTICE FROM THE COUNTY AND THAT THEN AND THERE IT HALL BECOME NULL AND VOID. HE ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT BASED UPON PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA SHALL NOT PREVENT THE BUILDING OFFICIAL FROM THEREAFTER REQUIRING THE CORRECTION OF ERRORS IN SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA OR FROM PREVENTING BUILDING OPERATION BEING CARRIED ON THEREUNDER WHEN IN VIOLATION OF THIS CODE OR ANY OTHER ORDINANCE OR REGULATION OF THIS URISDICTION. HE REVIEW OF THE SUBMITTED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND INSPECTIONS CONDUCTED THEREAFTER DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN CCEPTANCE OF ANY RESPONSIBILITIES OR LIABILITIES BY GARFIELD COUNTY FOR ERRORS, OMISSIONS OR DISCREPANCIES. THE ESPONSIBILITY FOR THESE ITEMS AND IMPLEMENTATION DURING CONSTRUCTION RESTS SPECIFICALLY WITH THE ARCHITECT, DESIGNER, UILDER AND OWNER. COMMENTS ARE INTENDED TO BE CONSERVATIVE AND IN SUPPORT OF THE OWNERS INTEREST. ^arforrn.003 I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE AGREEMENT ABOVE (INITIAL 1! (1,6L,,t-1%eL --1-2-9_xe_Ly- .5 5 S 2' y,2 r� Ij c a /�' 'J%` .3o Lr s -' Z D h' /'X17' 3oe Ir 3-Xs.29, 7 b" 5.44 '1?/7.7/ I ( 57S,'7 / z 4i o a o .S- i', Z 9s, / 7 09110/96 08:48 FAX 303 285 7596 WITT HOMES 444 GARFIELD COUNTY WITT HOMES P.O. BOX 628 PARACHUTE, CO 81635 (303) 285-7536 FAX: ( 303) 285-7596 FAX TEMISMISSION COVER SHEET Date: .sC?"n 10, 119e. To: DO LVE n1 s G PM Lp c a u ref Fax: 9 T }S� Subject: Lg 1 rt-t-CMev-r- C 1 -r}2 , Souder: c' Ar l G . YO U SHOULD .RECEIVE ' PAGE(S), INCLUDING VHS COVER SHEET. IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL THE PAGES, PLEASE CALL (303) 285-7536 e001 09210/96 08:49 FAX 303 285 7596 WITT HOMES 444 G,ARFIELD COUNTY U002 1w ,u ��.Z.11 1 1111. U ,I, I,il,ll I I ,i''•��'i' 1. I' ,'I �nlll'f'q_�j' Lincoln DeVore, Ina GaQtechnical Consultants 1441 MotcFSt. Grand Junction, CO 61505 March 7, 1995 Witt Homes P.O. Box 628 Parachute, CO 81635 TEL: (303) 242-8969 FAX' (303) 242-1561 RE: Subsurface Soils Exploration Spence Residence Lot 4, Block 2, Battlement Creek Trail As requested, Lincoln DeVore personnel have completed a geotech- nical exploratory program at the above referenced site. One shallow exploration hole were drilled in the vicinity of the proposed building pad as shown on the attached sketch. The purpose of this hole was to determine the types and character of the underlying soils and to relate these characteristics to the proposed foundation system_ This letter contains general recom- mendations for construction of a residential foundation, but is not a foundation design and cannot be used as such, Our conclu- sions and recommendations for this site are presented below. Soil Classification: The soils on this site consist of an alluvial debris -fan deposit which is quite thick and extremely stratified.. This debris fan originates on the middle and upper slopes of Battlement Mesa to the east southeast, along the Bat- tlement Greek and Monument Gulch Drainages. The stratification within this debris fan features ranges from sandy silts and silty clays in the finer portions and gravely silty clays to silty gravels and cobbles in the coarser portions. Many strata of the finer -grained soils are of low to medium density and exhibit metastable properties of variable degrees of severity. The soils on this site were found to consist of approximately 6° of sandy silts and sandy silty clay, which in turn overlie grav- elly silts and silty gravels and boulders. Generally, the upper silts and clays are damp to slightly damp, firm and of low densi- ty. The upper soils are very stratified, with some strata exhib- iting compressible characteristics and some strata have some collapsible and compressible characteristics- The lower gravel- ly soils tend to exhibit a b5,gher density and may be quite diffi- cult to drill due to the presence of gravel and up to boulder sized fragments of basalt. 09110/96 08:48 FAX 303 285 7596 WITT HOMES Witt Homes Subsurface Soils Exploration Lot U, Block 2, Battlement Creek Trail March 7, 1995 Page 2 4-44 GARFIELD COUNTY 12003 The upper Soil Type was classified as a silty clay (CL) with strata of clay silt, under the Unified Classification System. This material is of low plasticity, of low to moderate permeabil- ity, and was encountered in a low density, damp to slightly damp condition. This soil is found in a relatively dry, dense condi- tion, it may undergo mild expansion with the entry of small amounts of moisture, but will undergo long-term consolidation upon the addition of larger amounts of moisture. Some strata in the upper 6' of the sail profile exhibit metastable characteris- tics. This soil will settle after being loaded. The maximum allowable bearing capacity for this soil was found to be 500 psf, with 150 psf minimum bead load pressure required. Due to the presence of thin metastable strata, any soils in the upper G" of the soils profile which are utilized for foundation bearing may require a minimum of wetting and re -rolling or up to 2' of soil removal and replacement with a properly compacted structural fill, placed in accordance with recommendations con- tained in this report. The soils encountered below 6' from the ground surface is classi- fied as a gravelly silt and a silty gravel (GM) of medium to very coarse grain size under the Unified Classification System. This soil type is of low plasticity and of moderate density. This soil will have virtually no tendency to expand upon the addition of moisture. Settlement will be minimal under the recommended foundation toads. This soil will undergo elastic settlement upon application of static foundation pressures. Such settlement is characteristically rapid and should he virtually complete by the end of construction. If the recommended allowable bearing values are not exceeded, and if all other recommendations are followed, differential movement will be within tolerable limits. At shal- low foundation depths this soil was found to have an average allowable hearing capacity of 3500 psf. The boring logs and related information show subsurface condi- tions at the date and location of this exploration. Soil canal- lions on l - tions may differ at locations other than those of the exploratory borings_ If the structure is moved any appreciable distance from the locations of the borings, the soil conditions may not be the same as those reported here. The passage of time may also result in a change in the soil conditions at the boring locations. Man --made Fill: The soils encountered in our test boring appear to be native to the site. Al! building foundations must penetrate any man-made fills which are present at the site at this time, as well as any fills which result from the excava- tion process. Careful examination of the open excavation will be 09!10/96 08:48 FAX 303 285 7596 WITT HOMES Witt Homes Subsurface Soils Exploration Lot 4, Block 2, Battlement Creek Trail March 7, 1995 Page 3 » -> GARFIELD COUNTY Z004 necessary to determine the presence or absence of man-made fills. The open excavation must be examined prior to the placement of concrete to establish that materials of proper des$gn bearing capacity have been exposed and that no soft spots or debris are present in the foundation area. A 24 hour notice is required for all field examinations to enable Lincoln DeVore to schedule personnel and provide service when needed. Some strata of metastable soil have been encountered in the upper 6` if the soil profile. If, upon careful observation of the open excavation, it is determined that the foundation soils are not suitable to support the proposed shallow foundation system, an over-excavation/replacement scheme should be used on this site. The existing low density, metastable soils, should be removed to a depth of 2 feet below the proposed bottom footing elevation. Once it is felt that adequate soil removal has been achieved, it .s recommended that the excavation be closely examined by a representative of Lincoln DeVore to ensure that an adequate overexcavation depth has indeed occurred and that the exposed soils are suitable to support the proposed structural man-made fill. Once this examination has been completed, it is recommended that a coarse grained, non -expansive, non -free draining man-made structural fill be imported to the site. The native soils may be utilized as structural fill, if specifically approved by the Geotechnical Engineer. This imported fill should be placed in the overexcavated portion of this site in lifts not to exceed 6 inches after compaction. A minimum of 90% of the soils maximum Modified Proctor dry density (ASTM 0-1557) must be maintained during the soil placement. These soils should be placed at a moisture content conducive to the required compaction (usually Proctor optimum moisture content ± 2%). The granular material must be brought to the required density by mechanical means. No Soaking, jetting or puddling techniques of any type should be used in placement of fill on this site. T� ensure adequate later- al support, we must recommend that the zone of overexcavation extend at least 2 feet around the perimeter of the proposed footing. To confirm the quality of the compacted fill product, it is recommended that surface density tests be taken at maximum 2 foot vertical intervals. When the structural fill is completed, an allowable bearing capacity of 1800 psf maximum may be assumed for proportioning the footings. 09/10/96 08;48 FAX 303 285 7580 WITT HOMES Witt Homes Subsurface Soils Exploration Lot 1., Block 2, Battlement Creek Trail March 7, 1995 Page 4 -3 GARFIELD COUNTY 121005 Soil Moisture Conditions: No free water was encoun- tered during drilling on this site. In our opinion the true tree water surface is fairly deep in this area, and hence, should not affect construction. Seepage moisture may affect construction if surface drainage is not properly controlled. Most Ilydrocompacticn mitigation techniques for metastable soils are drainage considerations. The most important drainage consid- eration would be the continual. maintenance of positive surface drainage away from the structures at all. points. Positive sur- face drainage conditions must be maintained both during construc- tion and throughout the service life of the structures. No flat areas or closed depressions should be allowed to exist anywhere on the site. Proper control of all roof runoff is extremely important. It i.s strongly recommended that downspout discharges be piped away from the structure. No water should be allowed to pond or stand within 20 feet of any structure. No subsurface seepage was encountered during drilling. However, the soil profile is stratified with occasional thin lenses of moderately permeable silt and sandy silt.. If seepage should be encountered or is anticipated in the open excavation. some spe- cial drainage construction will be required. This could consist of an interceptor drain placed between the water source and the proposed building site to collect subsurface seepage before it can reach the foundation area. Additional recommendations re- garding such a drain system can be provided at a later date, if required. Foundation Type. Recommended: We•recommend the use of a conventional shallow foundation system consisting of continuous spread footings beneath all bearing walls and isolated spread footings beneath all columns and other points of concentrated load. Such a shallow foundation system, resting on the native alluvial soils, may be designed on the basis of an allowable bearing capacity of 900 psf maximum. A minimum dead load of 150 psf must be maintained. Contact stresses beneath all continuous walls should be balanced to within } or - 200 psf at all points_ Isolated interior column footings should be designed for contact stresses of about 150 psf less than the average used to balance the continuous walls, The criterion for balancing will depend somewhat upon the nature of the structure. Single -story, slab on grade structures may be balanced on the basis of dead load only. Multi -story structures may be balanced on the basis of dead load plus 1/2 live load, for up to 3 stories. 09/10/96 08:48 FAX 303 285 7596 WITT HOMES Witt Homes Subsurface Soils Exploration Lot 4, Block 2, Battlement Creek Trail march 7, 1995 Page 5 H4-> GARFIELD COUNTY 0006 If it is determined that a structural fill must be placed beneath this foundation, the above recommendations should be followed however, the maximum allowable bearing capacity may be increased to 1800 psf. Reinforcing: Stem walls for a shallow foundation system should be designed as grade beams capable of spanning at least 13 feet. These "grade beams" should be horizontally reinforced both near the top and near the bottom. The horizontal reinforcement required should be placed continuously around the structure with no gaps or breaks. A foundation system designed in this manner should provide a rather rigid system and, threfore, be better able to tolerate differential movements associated with potential soil consolidation and minor soil collapse. Floor Slabs: Floor slabs on grade, ii any, should he positively separated from all structural portions of this build- ing and allowed to float freely_ Frequent scoring (control joints) of the slabs should he provided to allow for possible shrinkage cracking of the slab. These control joints should be placed to provide maximum slab areas of approximately 200 to 360 square feet_ Any man-made fill placed below floor slabs on grade Should be compacted to a minimum of 90% of its maximum Modified Proctor dry density, ASTM D-1557. These soils should be placed at a moisture content conducive to the required compaction (usually Proctor optimum moisture content +2%. trainaPe and Grading: Surface grading should be completed in such a manner that all runoff moisture is removed from the vicinity of the structure as quickly as possible. It is recommended that a minimum surface gradient of g% be maintained away from the structure for the first 10 feet. Roof downspouts and sill cocks should be carried across all backfill areas and allowed to discharge well away from the building. Proper dis- charge of roof drain downspouts may require the use subsurface piping in some areas. All lawn sprinkling heads should be placed at least 10 feet away from the foundation. Future owners of this structure should be advised to fill in any settled yard areas to eliminate ponding of water near the structure and to provide adequate slope for proper drainage away from the structure and off the site at all times. If adequate surface drainage cannot be maintained, or if subsur- face seepage is encountered during excavation for foundation construction, a full perimeter drain is recommended for this building. Oar/10/96 08:48 FAX 303 285 7596 WITT HOMES Witt Homes Subsurface Soils Exploration Lot 4, Block 2, Battlement Creek Trail March 7, 1993 Page 6 -ii GARFIELD COUNTY 0007 Rackfillt To reduce settlement and aid in keeping water from reaching beneath this building, all backfill around this building should be mechanically compacted to $O% of its maximum Modified Proctor dry density ASTM D-1557. The only excep- tion to this would be the components of the perimeter foundation drain, if any. All backfill should be composed of the native snits and should not be placed by soaking, jetting or puddling. All backfill placed in utility trenches around this structure or below foundation walls should be mechanically compacted to a minimum of 90% of its maximum Modified Proctor dry density ASTM D-1357. These sails should be placed at a moisture content condu- cive to the required compaction (usually Proctor optimum content f2%. Cemtnt T-yne= Type II, Type I-lI or Type II -V cement is recommended for all concrete which is in contact with the soils on this site. Calcium chloride should not be added to a Type II, Type I-II or Type II -V cement under any circumstances. Remarks: The bottoms of all exterior foundations should be located a minimum of 36 Inches below finished grade for frost protection. Senate till 13 Discussion: This particular residence is being constructed on foundation coils which do ret possess a "significant potential for expansion". We recommend that the owner receive a copy of this summary report of our soil analysis and site recommendations. Respectfully submitted, LINCOLN DeVORE, INC. ny: Edwar M. Morris EIT Western Slope Manager LD .Joh # 82544-J Reviewed by. r Y E A i4 �r/ c_L INSPECTION WILL NOT BE MADE UNLESS THIS CARD IS POSTED ON THE JOB 24 HOURS NOTICE REQUIRED FOR. INSPEC'T'IONS BUILDING PERMIT GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO Date Issued ./ . ..Zoned Area Permit No 6069 AGREEMENT In consideration of the issuance of this permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with all . laws and regulations related to the zoning, location; construction and erection of the proposed structure for which this permit is granted, and further agrees that if the above said regulations arc not fully complied with in the zoning, location, erection and construction of the above described structure, the permit may then be revoked by notice from the County Building Inspector an I D�IfATE Y BECOME NUL AND VOI- Use )t if Address tier Setbacks egal Description Contractor / 7 Front Side Side Rear This Card Must Be Posted So It is Plainly Visible Froin The Street Until Final Inspection. INSPECTION RECORD Footing Foundation y 5 -- Underground Plumbing Insulation J,;,- ; 7 - `r'+; I ` -, Rough Plumbing i_-`;`- *r /.,-,.. Drywall i - , : • /,«. Chimney & Vent ; ;. , - .a _•,c_ ` , Electric Final (by Stale Inspector) I.J3 r7 CV— Gas Piping, •. , - ,-. ' Final t-(--`i-Y-9'7 , .r` Electric Rough (By State Inspeclor)!t-It Septic Final Framing , 4' '' (To include Roof in place and Windows and Doors installed). Notes: ALL LISTED ITEMS MUST BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE COVERING - WHETHER INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR, UNDERGROUND OR ABOVE GROUND. THIS PERMIT 1S NOT TRANSFERABLE Phone 945-8212 109 8th Street County Courthouse Glenwood Springs, Colorado. APP Date 0 EDDO NOT DESTROY THIS CARD Y IF PLACED OUTSIDE - COVER WITH CLEAR PLASTIC