Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1.0 ApplicationLAND DESIGN PARTNERSHIP 918 Cooper Avenue, Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 970-945-2246 / Fax 970-945-4066 May 9, 2002 Kim Schlagel Garfield County Planning Dept. 108 8th Street Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Re: Lake Spring Ranch PUD Preliminary Plan — Revised Application Dear Kim: Attached is one copy of the revised Lake Spring Ranch PUD Preliminary Plan and supplemental documentation. The revised preliminary plan street and lot layout is identical to the approved PUD Plan as recommended by Mark and Don. Supplemental reports and documentation have been modified to be consistent with the revised plan. Please review the application for completeness. Give me a call if you need more copies for the completeness review. Sincerely, /Zd Ronald B. Liston pc: Mike Berkeley John Schenk • .5.") Ft) F.; #. • r h itt , 74-k .44 Ai '4 . .1ft -- I A NT , A • a" •41 Id/ _ FOR FRE LAiEStr TP; riiirr Pi CP .4 NC j.# t_t 41. 1-, trii4RFIEf D (or 0A-14_00 FiC.E JOF3 \lay S. 396 Cot; 1 14 ood Spr ns CC) 81601 le;:e: (90) 945-543 2 P .ret 211 CC.1rY F,nzi7efir 1517 I; I Avc,:7,t1c. Suite 1.0i. Sprins.s., CO 81601 • • GARFIELD COUNTY PRELIMINARY PLAN REQUIRMENTS LAKE SPRINGS RANCH PUD SUBDIVISION The following outlines each element of the subdivision regulations and notes generally where this information can be found in the application. REGULATION REFERENCE SECTION NO. DESCRIPTION 4.50 4:50 A 4.50 B 4.50 C 4.50 D 4.50 E 4.50 F 4.50 G 4.50 H 4.50 I 4.50 J 4.50 K 4.50 L 4.50 M 4.50 N 4.50 0 4.60 4.60 A 4.60 B 4.60 C 4.60 D 4.60 E 4.60 F 4.60 G 4.60 H 4.70 4.70 A 4.70 B 4.70 C 4.70 D PRELIMINARY PLAN MAP Name of Subdivision Date etc. Boundary & Legal Names of Owner, Eng. Etc Vicinity Map Adjacent Properties Lot Areas Easements Setbacks Land Use Summary Existing Conditions Common Open Space Public Land Dedication LOCATION SHEET # 1 SHEET # 1-41 SHEET # 4 SHEET # 1 SHEET # 1 SHEET # 4 SHEET # 4 SHEET # 4 - 11 SHEET #4-11 SHEET # 3 & 4 SHEET #12-16 SHEET # 4 -11 N/A No school site or public lands to be dedicated. School impact fees will be paid per county regulations. Street Grades SHEET # 17 - 29 Existing Easements SHEET # 4 - 11 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Terms of Dedications Phasing Evidence of Access Off-street Parking No non single-family residential uses p Soil & Topographic Hazards Radiation Hazard Title Commitment/Deed Sectional Subdivision COVENANTS SHEET # 2 SHEET # 4 - 11 NA roposed. HP GEOTECH REPORT HP GEOTECH REPORT TITLE POLICY N/A SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION Geology HP GEOTECH REPORT Soils HP GEOTECH REPORT & SCS MAP & TABLES Vegetation BEACH ENVIR. REPORT Wildlife BEATTIE REPORT • 4.80 4.80 A 4.80 B 4.80 C 4.80 D 4.90 4.91 4.91 A 4.91 B 4.91 C 4.91 D 4.91 E 4.92 4.92 A 4.92 B 4.92 C • 4.92 D 4.92 E 4.93 4.94 • DRAINAGE PLAN Existing Water Courses Tributary Areas Tributary Flows Design of Drainage Facilities UTILITY PLAN Water Supply Rights, Quality & Quantity Central Supply Existing System Individual Supply Augmentation Plan Sanitary Sewer Public Sewer Central Treatment Existing District Individual Sewage Disposal ISDS Management Plan UTILITY & ROAD PLANS SHEET # 12 - 16 DRAINAGE REPORT DRAINAGE REPORT SHEET #12-16 ZANCANELLA REPORT ENGINEER'S REPORT SHEETS # 30 - 36 NA NA ZANCANELLA REPORT ENGINEER'S REPORT NA Can & Will Serve Letter from Spring Valley Sanitation District NA NA ENGINEER'S REPORT SHEET # 17 - 29 OFF-SITE ROAD IMPACT FEE ENGINEER'S REPORT • OVERVIEW • • • OVERVIEW LAKE SPRINGS RANCH PUD -PRELIMINARY PLAN Introduction: Lake Springs Ranch PUD was originally approved in 1979 followed by an amendment resulting in a total dwelling unit count if 210 dwelling units. Efforts were then made to provide for a central wastewater treatment facility and a preliminary plan and final plat were processed by Garfield County. The final plat approval was extended a few times but was never recorded due to the lack of central sewage treatment services. Sewage treatment services are now available through the Spring Valley Sanitation District. The attached preliminary plan is consistent with the original Planned Unit Development approval except for minor acreage variations due to the more refined engineer of the preliminary plan. Existing Conditions: The site is located in the southerly portion of Spring Valley immediately north of lands owned by the Colorado Mountain Junior College and south of the recently approved Chenoa PUD. The property is split, north to south, by County Road (CR) 114 and again to the west of CR 114 by County Road 119. In this area, CR119 is a dirt road that is passable only when dry. Topographically, the property includes both valley floor and the adjacent rolling slopes that define Spring Valley. The lower valley floor has historically been in irrigated agricultural production and is currently the location of the Rivendell Sod Farm. The rolling slopes • above the valley floor range in gradient from 5% to some limited areas in excess of 40%. These slopes are dominated by sage brush intermixed with a few open grass meadows. This area has historically been used as dry land pasture. The linear areas that have been cleared of sagebrush on these rolling slopes define the layout of the proposed subdivision street system, which was rough graded during the '80s. A Targe pond is located on the uphill side of CR 114. The northerly area of the valley floor is occupied with the sod farm. 1 Development Description: The PUD proposes 194 single-family lots and four cluster - housing Tots located largely on the rolling hillsides and the edges of the valley floor. The four parcels identified by the preliminary plan as Cluster Housing Tracts are allowed to have up to four dwelling units within each parcel. These units may be configured as single- family lots, duplexes or a multi -family structure. No division of these tracts is proposed at this time. Re -subdivision may be proposed for these tracts in the future. Lots in the Residential / Single Family District are typically just over one acre in size with the rear portion of the lots restricted from development by the building envelopes as shown on the preliminary plan. A neighborhood type park is proposed around the Targe pond located in Phase I of the development. The Phase I development of the park will include perpendicular parking along Lakeside Lane, lawn area, soft surface pedestrian path around the pond, picnic shelter, picnic tables and BBQ grills. If possible, the existing small log 1 • structure will be relocated to be within the park and will be owned by the homeowner's association as a community building. • • Land Use Summary Existing Zoning: Planned Unit Development Total Development Area: 441.620 acres Total Number of Lots: 198 Total Number of Dwelling Units: 210 Gross Density: 210 units / 441.62 acres = 0.48 units per acre 441.62 acres / 210 units = 2.10 acres per unit A wildfire consultant and the Colorado State Forest Service have reviewed potential wildfire hazards at the site. Their reports, included in this application, state that any wildfire hazard found on the proposed Tots can be appropriately mitigated by following the standard guidelines of the State Forest Service. According to the investigations of Beach environmental, no wetlands will be impacted by the proposed development. A weed and vegetation management plan prepared by Beach is included with this submission. Standard school and off site road impact fees will be paid with each final plat. Sewer: The Spring Valley Sanitation District will provide wastewater treatment services. The District's treatment plant has been recently expanded and a main sewer line has been constructed from the treatment plant to the Chenoa property at the north edge of the Lake Springs Ranch PUD. Tertiary treated water from the new plant will be pumped back up into the Spring Valley basin for land application by various Spring Valley properties. Water: Domestic water will be provided by on-site wells. Water will be treated and pumped into a storage tank that will provide both domestic and fire suppression water. Water rights are provided by the existing augmentation plan (Case # W3571) and contracts with the Basalt Water Conservancy District. Comprehensive Plan — Study Area I: The PUD is mapped as an approved development by the Garfield County Comprehensive Plan for Study Area I. • PUD ZONE REG ULA TIONS • • JUN 1 9 1979 Reoordod at _o'clock /2 M Reception t,o X45.2tiL L':ic red Alsdorf, Recorder RESOLUTION No. 79-64 BOOK 530 P:GE 93 WHEREAS, Foster Petroleum Corporation has made application to the Board of County Commissioners of Garfield County, Colorado, for an amendment to the Zoning Map of the Garfield County Zoning Resolution, changing the follow- ing described land from Agricultural/Residential/Rural Density to Planned/Unit/Development District: A parcel of land described as Lots 5 and 6, Sectior. 32, Lots 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 20, 21, 22, 28 and the NE : SE : of Section 33, SW : SW : of Section 34 all in Town- ship 6 South, Range 88 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian and also Lots 2, 3, and 9 of Section 4, Township 7 South, Range 88 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian, County of Garfield, State of Colorado, and WHEREAS, Foster Petroleum Corporation has, in association ';ith such zoning amendment, applied for approval of a plan for LakeSprings Ranch, a Planned Unit Development, to be contained in the Planned Unit Development District, and WHEREAS, said application has been referred to the Planning Commission of Gar`'='d County, Colorado, for its approval, disapproval, or recommendation all as provided in Section 10.04 of the Garfield County Zoning Resolution; and WHEREAS, said application has been submitted tc the Planting Department of Garfield County, the Environmental Health Department of Garfield County, and the Regiona_ Engineer of the Colorado State Health Department for thorough and complete review thereof esulting in various comments and recommendations from said departments, all of which comments and recommendations have been presented to said Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners and now comprise a portion of the record of the proceedings in respect tc such application; and WHEREAS, the said Planning Commission has provided to the Board of County Commissioners of Garfield County, Colorado, its recommendation that the said application be approved with certain ,:onditions, all as more particularly specified in the minutes of the said Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Garfield County, Colorado, has duly and regularly held a public hear- ing on said application in conformity with the laws of the State of Colorado and the provisions of said Zoning Resolution; and WHEREAS, a portion of the proposed planned unit devel- opment lies at an elevation which cannot be served by the central sewage system which will serve the balance of the Planned Unit Development, necessitating the use of individual sewage systems in such locations; and WHEREAS, the :toard has determined that the orderly development of Garfield County requires that progress be made toward development and occupancy of the proposed Lake Springs Ranch Planned Unit Development, and that such progress may be assured through the requirement that a final plat for at least 25% of the 195 single family residential lots within • • eoox 530 PACE .94 the Planned Unit Development shall receive final approval of the Board of County Commissioners within twelve months of the adopticn of this resolution, and that all utilities necessary to serve that portion of the development be in place within eighteen months of the approval of such final plat; and WHEREAS, the Board has determined that, other than in the foregoing particulars, the requested zone change amendment and plan approval are in general conformity with the General Plan for Garfield County, Colorado, and meet all requirements of the Zoning Resolution. of Garfield County, Colorado, and has further determined that the requested Planned Unit Development is suitable and approp- riate for the subject property considering the location, condition and circumstances of said property, and that the proposed amendment implements the purposes and meets the standards and requirements of the Planned Unit Development provisions of the Garfield County Zoning Resolution; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of Commissioners cf Garfield County, Colorado, 1. That the application for amendment of the above- described property from Agricultural/Residential/Rural Density to Planned Unit Development be and hereby is granted, and that the appropriate zone district maps describing the areas encompassed by such amendment be amended to reflect this amendment; subject to the conditions more fully set forth below; 2. That the application for approval cf the plan of Lake Sprints Ranch be and hereby is approved, with the follow.ng modifications, .Lc which. a72" --n- —.act in'' -=-n its agreement within thirty days of ad=_tion herein, order that this Resclu:ion shall be effective: (a) _.`.e final plat or plats of the Planned .,nit Development shall designate those lots to which central sewage service will not be extended, which shall be limited to those which, because of natural 'arriers or obstructions may not receive such service and shall not exceed ten in number; (b) That the final plat for at least 25% of the 195 single family residential lots within the Planned Unit Development shall be submitted in adequate time to assure final approval of this Board within twelve months of the approval of this Resolution, and that all utilities to serve that portion of the development be in place within eighteen months of the approval of such final plat, in default of which the Board of County Commissioners may, after establish- ment of such default at a public hearing of which applicant or its successors in interest and interested parties shall be given such notice as is then required for amendments to the Garfield County Zoning Resolution, order that the zone district maps of the Garfield County Zoning Resolution be amended to designate the above-described lands Agricultural/ Residential/Rural Density. 3. That the Planned Unit Development shall consist of three Zoning Districts, the boundaries of which shall be indicated upon the final plat of Lake Springs Ranch Planned Unit Development, which districts shall be identified as follows: Residential/Single Family District, also designated R/S.F. • • • BOOK 530 PLGE 95 Residential/Cluster Housing District, also designated R/C.H. Agricultural/Open Space District, also designated A/O.S. 4. That the uses permitted within said districts, together with the regulations affecting the usage of the land contained therein, shall be as follows: I. R/S.F. - RESIDNETIAL/SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICT A. Uses, by right. Single -Family dwelling and customary accessory uses including buildings for shelter or enclosure of small animals or property accessory to use of the lot for single family residential purposes and fences, hedges, gardens, walls and similar landscape features. Park and Greenbelt. B. Uses, conditional. None C. Uses, special. None D. Minimum lot area. 1 acre E. Maximum Lot Coverage. 15 percent F. Minimum Setback. Front yard -- 30 feet Side yard -- 20 feet Rear yard -- 50 feet G. Maximum Building Height. 25 feet H. Off -Street Parking/Residential. Four (4) off-street parking spaces on the same lot for each dwelling unit or one (1) space per 600 square feet of floor area whichever is greater. II. R/C.H. - Residential/Cluster Housing District A. Uses, by right. Single -Family dwelling, Duplex dwelling, Triplex dwelling and customary accessory uses including buildings for shelter or enclosure of small anima's or property accessory to use of the lot for residen- tial purposes and fences, hedges, gardens, walls, and similar landscape features. No more than three dwelling units may exist in the R/C.3. District. Park and Greenbelt. BOOK 530 PAGE 96 B. Uses, Conditional. None C. Uses, special. None D. Minimum Cluster Housing lot area. 1. The Cluster Housing Lot shall be as shown on the P.U.D. Final Plat. 2. Lots within a Cluster Housing Lot shall have no minimum lot area. E. Maximum Coverage of the Cluster Housing District. 1. 5 percent of the total District area. 2. Lots within the R/C.H. District shall have no coverage limit except that the combined coverage of all internal lots shall not exceed the 5 percent maximum of the total District area. F. Minimum Setback from the Cluster Housing District . Boundary . 1. 50 feet 2. Lots within the R/C.H. District shall have no setback requirements. G. Maximum Building Height. 25 feet H. Off -Street Parking. Four (4) off-street parking spaces for each dwelling unit cr one (1) space per 600 square feet of floor area, whichever is greater. 111. A/O.S. - AGRICULTURAL/OPEN SPACE DISTRICT A. Uses, by right. Recreational including, stables, riding arena, kennel, pasture, water impoundments and customary accessory uses including buildings for shelter or enclosure of animals or property employed in any of the above uses. Recreation Vehicle Storage Park and Greenbelt B. Uses, Conditional. None C. Uses, Special. None D. Minimum Lot Area 2 acres -4- • BOOK 530 ?ICE 97 E. Maximum Lot Coverage. 15 percent F. Minimum Setback. Front Yard -- 40 feet Side Yard -- 40 feet Rear Yard -- 40 feet G. Maximum Building Height. 25 feet IV. Except as hereinabove provided, and except for the following sections of the Garfield County Zoning Re- solution, all provisions of the Garfield County Zoning Resolution shall be applicable to the Lake Springs Ranch P.U.D. Zoning Districts. The Sections of the said Zoning Resolution which shall have no applicability are as follows: Section 3.00 through 3.11.04 Section 4.01.02 paragraph p1 DATED this 18th day of June, 1979. THE BOARD OF COUNTY CONMMISSIONERS ATTEST: OF GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO 10.1.21 Deputy Clerk of thee) Chairman Board Resolution No. 79-153 WHEREAS, Foster Petroleum Corporation has made application �o the Board of County Commissioners of Garfield County, Colorado, for approval of an amendment to the Lake Springs Ranch Planned Unit Development Plan and Resolution No. 79-64 of the Board approving said Plan and establishing the uses permitted on the lands described in said Resolution in association with such Plan, which amendment would decrease the number of single family dwellings i.ncluded as part of the Lake Springs Ranch Planned Unit Development Plan from 195 units to 194 units and increase the number of dwelling units in the Residential Cluster Housing Dis- trict from 3 to 16 units; and WHEREAS, the Board has determined that such an amendment is consistent with the efficient development and perservation of the entire planned unit development, does not effect in a sub- stantially adverse manner either the enjoyment of land abutting upon or across a street from the planned unit development or the public interest, and is not intended solely to confer a special benefit upon any person, as required by C.R.S. 1973, 24-67-106(3)(b). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Garfield County, Section 1. That the modification of the Lake Springs Ranch Planned Unit Development Plann requested by Foster •Petroleum Company decreasing the number of single family units and lots within the Residential/Single Family District from 195 to 194 and increasing the number of dwelling units within the Residential/ Cluster Housing District from 3 to 16 be and hereby is approved; Section 2. That the number "195"appearing in paragraph 2.(b). of the operative provisions of Resolution NO. 79-64 be and hereby is amended to read "194"; Section 3. That Resolution No. 79-64 shall be and hereby is amended by the addition of a new paragraph in the operative provisions, which shall read as follows: 4. That the application for approval of the plan of Lake Springs Ranch Planned Unit Development Plan dated the 20th day of September, 1979, shall be and here- by is acquired, and shall govern the uses permitted on the described property except as otherwise herein provided. Dated the 10th day of December , 1979. ATTEST: 1411(j- ,,i4d1U0 •Na cy(bprick Pa6Flaven J. rise Deputy Clerk of the Board Chairman " BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO • PRELIMINARY PLAN REf UIREMENTS • • • LAKE SPRINGS RANCH PUD PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS SUBDIVISION APPLICATION FORM PRELIMINARY PLAN REQUIREMENTS OVERVIEW PUD ZONE DISTRICT REGULATIONS Garfield County Resolution No. 79-64 Garfield County Resolution No. 79-153 PUD ZONE MAP PRELIMINARY PHASING PLAN TITLE POLICY & CMC CONSENT LETTER CIVIL ENGINEERS ROADS & UTILITIES REPORT 4111 Spring Valley Sanitation District Can & Will Serve Letter DRAINAGE REPORT WATER REPORT GEOLOGIC AND SOILS REPORT SCS SOILS MAP & SCS SOIL TYPE DESCRIPTION / TABLES VEGETATION REPORT Wetland Evaluation Weed Management Plan WILDFIRE REPORT Wildfire Hazard Assessment Colorado State Forest Service Wildfire Review WILDLIFE REPORT PROTECTIVE COVENANTS 0 ATTACHMENT - PRELIMINARY PLAN DOCUMENTS • APPLICATION FORM • • • • Sketch Plan Preliminary Plan XXXX Final Plan SUBDIVISION APPLICATION FORM SUBDIVISION NAME: LAKE SPRINGS RANCH PUD OWNER: The Berkeley Family Partnership, Miriam Berkeley ENGINEER/PLANNER/SURVEYOR:. Planner - Land Design Part.; Engineer/Surveyor - High Country Eng., Inc LOCATION: Section: 32, 33, 34, T6S R88W, 6th P.M.; Section 4 T7S R 88W, 6th P.M. WATER SOURCE: Wells supplying a central water delivery system based on Augmentation Plan # W3571 and Basalt Water Conservancy District contract. SEWAGE DISPOSAL METHOD: Central treatment provided by the Spring Valley Sanitation District PUBLIC ACCESS VIA: County Roads 1 14 & 119 EXISTING ZONING: Lake Springs Ranch Planned Unit Development EASEMENTS: power line, sewer line TOTAL DEVELOPMENT AREA: (1) Residential Number Acres Single Family 194 231.430 Duplex 0 0 Multi -family 16 25.245 Mobile Home 0 0 (2) Commercial Floor Area Acres 0 0 (3) Industrial 0 0 (4) Public/Quasi-Public (road right-of-ways) 33.070 (5) Open Space / Common Area (Open Space Zone District) 151.875 TOTAL: 210 441.620 PARKING SPACES: Residential _808 estimate based on requirements of PUD. Commercial Industrial • PUD ZONE MAP • • • • 3 N 7 N i z 1 J LEGEND RESIDENTIAL ZONE PER G.C. RESOLUTION /79-64 AND /79-153 AGRICULTLRIAL/OPEN SPACE ZONE PER G.C. RESOLUTION /79-64 AND /79-'S3 RESIDENTIAL/CLUSTER HOUSING ZONE PER G.C. RESOLUTION /79-64 AND /79-153 ORIGINAL P.U.D. ZONE DISTRICT SUMMARY ZONE RESIDENTIAL/SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL/CLUSTER HOUSING AGRICULTURAL/OPENSPACE/SCHOOL RIGHT-OF-WAY TOTAL PROPOSED 2002 P.UD. PRELIMINARY PLAN LAND USE SUMMARY ACRES 229.242 25.368 150.066 32951 441.756± ZONE RESIDENTIAL/SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL/CLUSTER HOUSING AGRICULTURAL/OPEN SPACE/SCHOOL RIGHT-OF-WAY TOTAL ACRES 231430 25.245 151.875 33.070 441.620± O N HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC. a. 1517 BLAKE AVENUE, 14 INVERNESS DRIVE EAST, SUITE 101 SUITE D136 GLENWOOD SPRIGS, CO 81601 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 P1 .(970) 945-8676 PH .(303) 925-0554 FX(970) 945-2555 FX(303) 925-0547 GARF'E_C COUNTY, CO LAKE SPRINGS, PUD ZONE MAP SCALE:1' =1000' ZCN_-MAP.DWC DES. DJW CK: FILE NO. DR. DJW DATE: 4/8/02 2021003.54 SHEET • PRELIMINARY PHASING PLAN • • 01:37:54 Ph z 1 1 1 1 1 s„1; a 1 1 1 1 1 1 /'. ; 1 '"..,„ /' V 1 1 1W _ 1 1 e 1 1 1 1 (''.i 1� (4 1 1 g 1 1 � Cr- i 1 r 1 Pr1 1 1., 1 1 1 1 f 1 it —, HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC. ce 1517 BLAKE AVENUE. 14 INVERNESS DRIVE EAST, °- SURE 101 SUITE D136 ,.n = c LENWOOD SPRINGS. CO 81601 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 cn Q PH(970) 945-8876 PH(303) 92`x 0554 FX(970) 945-2555 FX(303) 925-0547 9. F.L.P. GARFIELD COUN CO LAKE SPPoNGS, PUD PHASING PLAN SCAL1. =1000' P=-_ __ NO. Sf DR. 2. a DATE: 4/8/02 2021003.54 DES. CK: • TITLE POLICY • • Commitment To Insure ALTA Commitment - 1970 Rev. -0 REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE 'rSURANCE COMPA'., ; Mmnesc:a corporaacn. herein called the Company. for a , . )0' .a uable consideration, hereby cor-- :s to issue its poi~-, :- Policies of title insurance. as identified in Scredule A, in favor * the proposed Insured named in Saedule A. as owner :- mortgagee of the estate or interest covered rereby in the land ** :ascribed or referred to in Schedue A. upon payment r :-e premiums and charges therefor; all subject :: the provisions of * S:nedule A and 8 and to the Canunons ano Snpuiauc-s -_roof. * - s Commitment shall be effective only when the iden:a:.:' the proposed Insure and the amount of the policy or * i v ::!cies corm tied for have been -sante: in Schedule A -, _of by :-e Company. either at the time of toe issuance of this * 4. * "Or _.mmitment Jr by subsequent encasement. s Commitment is preliminary to :he issuerca of sucn :::v or pcic es of title insurance and all habint, and obligations -=•eunder snail cease and terming a six morins after the ecove da:e hereof or .men the policy or ponces committed for :-311 issue. .whichever first occurs. provided :hat the fair. _ :o issue such policy or polices is not the feu : of the Company. ::NDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS ' The term "mortgage". when used herein. shall include feed of fust, trust deed. or other security instrument. If the proposed Insured has dr acquires actual kne.v c::e of any refect, hen. encumbrance. adverse Naim or other matter affecting the estate or interest or mor,:age the =:n covered by this Commitment ::rer than :hose shoxr - Schedule B hereof. and shall fail to disclose such knowledge to the Company in wnung, the Company shall `_e rehe.a: from liability for any loss or ba—c:e res.iting from an. a:I of reua-ce hereon :o the extent the Company is prejudiced by failure of the proposed Insured to so discicse sucr awledge. If the proposed Insure: snail d s: Pse such x -:,..-.edge :::-e Comoar, or if the Camper, otherwise accsires actual knowledge of any such defect, hen. en:_mbrar:e adverse claim or other matter.: -a Compe-, at its an::- may arre-: Schee 8 of this Commitment a:cordingi, :ut such amendment shall not relieve the Camper. 'ram o: ity previously incurred pursuan::::aracra:- 3 of ,nese=_nditicr: e -d Su:u e.::ns : Liabiht, of the Company unci• :".is Cor--ument s -a :e only :: '72 named proposed Insured an: oarnes included under the definition of Insured in the 'orm ::ncy or poncies committed for a-::r.ly ectua!lass -:-red in raiiance here:: in undertaking In :::: faith lel :o mply with the requirements hereof or (b) to aamma r a,ceptions snown in Schedule E. or ic1 :o e:quire or : ne:a the es e.:a or interest dr mortgage thereon ::.ered by :-is went. In no event shall such liability e.feed the amount stated in Schedule A for :-e poli:, :r polices ::—mated ':r and sucn :ability is subject to :ne rsunng • uvisions and the Conditions and Stipulations and the _ c!usions :rem Coverage of the ':-- of oc.i:y or Polices ::mmitte: ':r in favor of :ne propose: Insure:::hich are hereby incorporated by reference and made a :art 01 :- 3 Commitment except as express,.. —od fie: -even Any action or actions or ngn:s :f actin :mat :he :•----=d Insu e: may hate or may bring against :7E Conran. ansing out of the status dr the title to the estate or -.e-est or the status of the mortga:e :-ere:- ::vered :, s Comm.•—ant mus: :e cased on and ares a:: to :he provisions of this Commitment. -:NDARO EXCEPTIONS ?ddiuon :p the matters container n the :_-,Incas a - :.oularic-s and Exc:ius :rs from Cc.arce e:_.a referred to, this CommirTent is also subject :::-e f: ng: Rights or claims of parties in possession -a: shown :.: e public •ecords. Easements. or claims of easeme-.:s. not s -own :y77e. Oiscrepanaes. conflicts in bouncary ones shortage 1r i=3. encrce:rments. ane any facts ~.mon a :ore:: survey and inspection of the premises would :._close e-: which are not shown by :he pubic reccr:s Any lien or nght to a hen, for services. a:Pr or mate -e thereto':'e or hereafter furr shed. moose: c. aw and not shown by the cuolic records Defects. dens. encumbrances. a:.erse C.C.'S or o:ne•—=::ers. if a-. created. 'first appearing :n the :._:c records or attaching subsequent to the effective date -areof :_::nor to :he late the proposed insured eco_ es of rec:': glue :-e estate or interest or moc:epe :'are:^ covered :. this Commitment NITNESS .,'/HEREOF, Old Repu: Nanc Tale In:. c -:e Compa-. has caused ::s corpora:F. Tame e-: seal to he hereunto affi.ea by is duly authorized office-: ')r '-a :ate she nn in Schedule A to co .and :.r:- courterp.o-ao by a '.e anng officer or other a.toonzn: s amatory Aired Signatory ORT Form 2582 OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A Stccx Company 400 Second Avenue South. Minneapolis. Minnesota 55401 (612. 371-1111 8y Attes: ~resident Secretary • Property Address: Old Republic National Title Insurance Company ALTA COMMITMENT Our Order No. GW235820 Schedule A Cust. Ref.: 1. Effective Date: May 25, 2001 at 5:00 P.M. 2. Policy to be Issued, and Proposed Insured: "TBD" Commitment Proposed Insured: TBD • 3. The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment and covered herein is: A Fee Simple 4. Title to the estate or interest covered herein is at the effective date hereof vested in: THE BERKELEY FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, A COLORADO LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 5. The land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows: • SEE ATTACHED PAGE(S) FOR LEGAL DESCRIPTION Our Order No. GW235820 LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL A: TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 88 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M. SECTION 32: LOTS 5 AND 6 SECTION 33: LOTS 7 THROUGH 17 INCLUSIVE, LOTS 20 THROUGH 23, INCLUSIVE, AND NE1/4SE1/4 SECTION 34: SW1/4SW1/4 TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 88 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M. SECTION 4: LOTS 2, 3 AND 9 EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED ON DEEDS RECORDED AS RECEPTION NO. 419600 IN BOOK 795 AT PAGE 72 AND RECORDED AS RECEPTION NO. 423827 IN BOOK 804 AT PAGE 899 OF THE GARFIELD COUNTY RECORDS. AND EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE ABOVE, THOSE PORTIONS CONVEYED TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF GARFIELD COUNTY FOR ROAD PURPOSES BY DOCUMENTS RECORDED JUNE 3, 1929 IN BOOK 159 AT PAGE 85 AS RECEPTION NO. 104496 AND IN BOOK 159 AT PAGE 87 AS RECEPTION NO. 104498. AND EXCEPTING THEREFROM A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN THE SWI/4SW1/4 SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 88 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF GARFIELD, STATE OF COLORADO; SAID PARCEL BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 34, A 2 1/2" GARFIELD COUNTY BRASS CAP FOUND IN PLACE; THENCE N 88 DEGREES 10' 28" E ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 34 A DISTANCE OF 984.24 FEET, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING;THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTHERLY LINE N 02 DEGREES 50' 09" W A DISTANCE OF 1220.49 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE SW1/4SW1/4 OF SAID SECTION 34; THENCE N 89 DEGREES 02' 17" E ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE A DISTANCE OF 358.19 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID SW1/4SW1/4 SECTIN 34; THENCE S 02 DEGREES 50' 09" E ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE A DISTANCE OF 1215.09 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 34; THENCE S 88 DEGREES 10' 28" W ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE A DISTANCE OF 358.06 FEET, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL B: A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN THE NE1/4 OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 88 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF GARFIELD, STATE OF COLORADO: SAID PARCEL BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 4, A BLM ALUMINUM CAP IN PLACE, THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; • • • Our Order No. GW235820 LEGAL DESCRIPTION THENCE S 16 DEGREES 39' 55" W 217.38 FEET; THENCE S 27 DEGREES 00' 32" W 277.20 FEET; THENCE S 48 DEGREES 11' 02" W 452. 97 FEET; THENCE N 89 DEGREES 49' 27" W 293.53 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 200.00 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 54 DEGREES 03' 51", A DISTANCE OF 188.72 FEET;(CHORD BEARS N 62 DEGREES 47' 31" W 181.80 FEET) THENCE N 35 DEGREES 45' 36" W 8.96 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A NON -TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 330.00 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 17 DEGREES 32' 14", A DISTANCE OF 101.01 FEET (CHORD BEARS S 57 DEGREES 47' 34" W 100.61 FEET); THENCE S 10 DEGREES 53' 01" E 108.00 FEET; THENCE N 89 DEGREES 49' 27" W 293.31 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF THAT PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN RECEPTION NO. 462134 OF THE GARFIELD COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER'S OFFICE; THENCE N 00 DEGREES 11' 22" E ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY 337.83 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY N 89 DEGREES 51' 49" E 217.99 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY N 00 DEGREES 16' 49" W 489.87 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY S 89 DEGREES 49' 20" E 1127.60 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL C: A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN THE NW1/4SW1/4 SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 88 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF GARFIELD, STATE OF COLORADO; SAID PARCEL BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 34, AN ALUMINUM CAP L.S. NO. 5993 FOUND IN PLACE, THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE N 89 DEGREES 51' 50" W ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE NW1/4SW1/4 SECTION 34 A DISTANCE OF 201.90 FEET; THENCE LEAVING THE NORTHERLY LINE S 03 DEGREES 53' 31" E A DISTANCE OF 1233.02 FEET, TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID NW1/4SW1/4; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE S 89 DEGREES 13' 59" W A DISTANCE OF 199.56 FEET, TO S1/16 OF SECTION 34 AND 33, A 2 1/2" GARFIELD COUNTY SURVEYOR BRASS CAP FOUND IN PLACE; THENCE N 03 DEGREES 59' 40" W ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 34 A DISTANCE OF 1235.37 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; ALSO A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN THE NE1/4 SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 88 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF GARFIELD, STATE OF COLORADO, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE N1/4 OF SECTION 4; THENCE S 44 DEGREES 45' 28" E A DISTANCE OF 1896.61 FEET, TO THE NORTHEAST SIXTEENTH CORNER OF SAID SECTION 4, ALSO BEING THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THAT PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN RECEPTION NO. 419600 IN THE GARFIELD COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER'S OFFICE, THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE N 00 DEGREES 19' 20" E ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID RECEPTION NO. 419600 A DISTANCE OF 513.74 FEET, TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER; THENCE S 89 DEGREES 49' 27" E ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID RECEPTION NO. 419600 A DISTANCE OF • • • Our Order No. GW235820 LEGAL DESCRIPTION 293.31 FEET, TO A POINT IN AN EXISTING FENCE; THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTHERLY LINE S 10 DEGREES 46' 41" ALONG SAID EXISTING FENCE A DISTANCE OF 540.03 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID EXISTING FENCE N 89 DEGREES 15' 38" W A DISTANCE OF 1728.18 FEET, TO A POINT ON THE NORTH -SOUTH CENTERLINE OF SAID SECTION 4; THENCE LEAVING SAID EXISTING FENCE N 00 DEGREES 17' 22" W ALONG SAID NORTH -SOUTH CENTERLINE A DISTANCE OF 1.14 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THAT PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN RECEPTION NO. 280798 IN THE GARFIELD COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER'S OFFICE; THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTH -SOUTH CENTERLINE S 89 DEGREES 45' 06" E ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE A DISTANCE OF 1330.86 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. COUNTY OF GARFIELD STATE OF COLORADO ALTA COMMITMENT • (Requirements) Our Order No. GW235820 The following are the requirements to be complied with: Payment to or for the account of the grantors or mortgagors of the full consideration for the estate or interest to be insured. Proper instrument(s) creating the estate or interest to be insured must be executed and duly filed for record, to -wit: THIS COMMITMENT IS FOR INFORMATION ONLY, AND NO POLICY WILL BE ISSUED PURSUANT HERETO. • • ALTA COMMITMENT (Exceptions) Our Order No. GW235820 The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company: 1. Rights of claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. 2. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public records. 3. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, and any facts which a correct survey and inspection of the premises would disclose and which are not shown by the public records. 4 Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material theretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. Defects, Liens encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. . Taxes and assessments not yet due or payable and special assessments not yet cenifted to the Treasurer's office. Any unpaid taxes or assessments against said land. Liens for unpaid water and sewer charges, if any. DEED OF TRUST DATED OCTOBER 28, 1997 FROM THE BERKELEY FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, A COLORADO LIMITED PARTNERSHIP TO THE PUBLIC TRUSTEE OF GARFIELD COUNTY FOR THE USE OF BANK OF COLORADO - WESTERN SLOPE TO SECURE THE SUM OF $76,000.00, AND ANY OTHER AMOUNTS PAYABLE UNDER THE TERMS THEREOF, RECORDED NOVEMBER 12, 1997, IN BOOK 1042 AT PAGE 144. AFFECTS PARCEL B 10. DEED OF TRUST DATED JANUARY 02, 2001 FROM THE BERKELEY FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, A COLORADO LIMITED PARTNERSHIP TO THE PUBLIC TRUSTEE OF GARFIELD COUNTY FOR THE USE OF BANK OF COLORADO TO SECURE THE SUM OF $402,033.19, AND ANY OTHER AMOUNTS PAYABLE UNDER THE TERMS THEREOF, RECORDED JANUARY 03, 2001, IN BOOK 1225 AT PAGE 242. AFFECTS PARCEL A 11. THE EFFECT OF INCLUSIONS IN ANY GENERAL OR SPECIFIC WATER CONSERVANCY, FIRE PROTECTION, SOIL CONSERVATION OR OTHER DISTRICT OR INCLUSION IN ANY I) WATER SERVICE OR STREET IMPROVEMENT AREA. ALTA COMMITMENT • (Exceptions) Our Order No. GW235820 The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company: 12. RIGHT OF PROPRIETOR OF A VEIN OR LODE TO EXTRACT AND REMOVE HIS ORE THEREFROM SHOULD THE SAME BE FOUND TO PENETRATE OR INTERSECT THE PREMISES AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED JULY 30, 1895, IN BOOK 12 AT PAGE 376 AND RECORDED AUGUST 6, 1895 IN BOOK 12 AT PAGE 378 AND RECORDED MAY 28, 1974 IN BOOK 459 AT PAGE 525. 13. RIGHT OF WAY FOR DITCHES OR CANALS CONSTRUCTED BY THE AUTHORITY OF THE UNITED STATES AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED JULY 30, 1895, IN BOOK 12 AT PAGE 376 AND RECORDED AUGUST 6, 1895 IN BOOK 12 AT PAGE 378, AND RECORDED SEPTEMBER 23, 1912 IN BOOK 71 AT PAGE 560 AND RECORDED MAY 28, 1974 IN BOOK 459 AT PAGE 525 AND RECORDED FEBRUARY 26, 1952 IN BOOK 263 AT PAGE 289. 14. ALL COAL AND OTHER MINERALS, TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT TO PROSPECT FOR, MINE AND REMOVE THE SAME PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS AND LIMITATIONS OF THE ACT OF DECEMBER 29, 1916 (39 STAT. 862) AS RESERVED BY THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IN THE PATEN RECORDED FEBRUARY 26, 1952 IN BOOK 263 AT PAGE 239. 15. ROAD PETITION RECORDED JUNE 12, 1929 IN BOOK 2 AT PAGE 11 AS RECEPTION NO. 104592. 16. ROAD VIEWING REPORT RECORDED JUNE 12, 1929 IN BOOK 2 AT PAGE 86 AS RECEPTION NO. 104593. 17. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF RESOLUTION NO. 79-64 RECORDED JUNE 19, 1979 IN BOOK 530 AT PAGE 93. 18. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT RECORDED MAY 02, 1991 IN BOOK 803 AT PAGE 445. 19. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF CONTRACT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 26, 1991 IN BOOK 814 AT PAGE 245. 20. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF AGREEMENT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 14, 1992 IN BOOK 841 AT PAGE 512. • ALTA COMMITMENT (Exceptions) Our Order No. GW235820 The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company: 21. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF UTILITY EASEMENT RECORDED NOVEMBER 12, 1997 IN BOOK 1042 AT PAGE 134. 22. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF OPTION AGREEMENT RECORDED MAY 09, 1994 IN BOOK 901 AT PAGE 701. 23. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF RIGHT OF WAY AND EASEMENT RECORDED MAY 30, 1995 IN BOOK 942 AT PAGE 171. 24. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF RESOLUTION 95-30 RECORDED APRIL 11, 1995 IN BOOK 937 AT PAGE 123. 25. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF CONTRACT RECORDED MAY 07, 1997 IN BOOK 1017 AT PAGE 945. 26. EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY FOR ROADS, STREETS, HIGHWAY, DITCHES, CANALS, PIPELINES AND UTILITY LINES AS CONSTRUCTED AND IN PLACE. • NOTE: UPON RECEIPT OF A SURVEY, MEETING THE ALTA MINIMUM STANDARDS FOR CONTENT AND ACCURACY, THE EXCEPTION SHOWN ABOVE WILL BE DELETED. PROVIDED HOWEVER, THAT LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY RESERVES THE RIGHT TO ADD ANY EXCEPTIONS IT DEEMS NECESSARY FOR MATTERS DISCLOSED BY SAID SURVEY. • • LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Required by C.R.S. 10-11-122 A) The subject real property may be located in a special taxing district. B) A Certificate of Taxes Due listing each taxing jurisdiction may be obtained from the County Treasurer's authorized agent. C) The information regarding special districts and the boundaries of such districts may be obtained from the Board of County Commissioners, the County Clerk and Recorder, or the County Assessor. Effective September 1, 1997, CRS 30-10-406 requires that all documents received for recording or filing in the clerk and recorder's office shall contain a top margin of at least one inch and a left, right and bottom margin of at lease one half o' ar inch. The clerk and recorder may refuse to record or file any d cument that does not conform, except that, the requirement for the top margin shall not apply to documents using forms on which space is provided for recording or filing information at the top margin of the document. Note: Colorado Division of Insurance Regulations 3-5-1, Paragraph C of Article VII requires that "Every title entity shall be responsible for all matters which appear of record prior to the tirr- of recording whenever the title dntity conducts the closing and is responsible for recording or iUng of legal documents resulting from the transaction which was closed". Provided that Land Tit'e Guarantee Company condu.,r • the closing of the insured transaction and is responsible for recorr'ing the legal documents from the transaction, exception number 5 will not appear on the Cw-ier's Title Policy and the Lenders Policy when issued. Note: Affirmative mechanic's lien protection for the Owner may be available(typically by deletion of Exception no. 4 of Schedule B, Section 2 of the Commitment from the Owner's Policy to be issued) upon compliance with the following conditions: A. The land described in Schedule A of this commitment must be a single family residence which includes a condominium or townhouse unit. B. No labor or materials have been furnished by mechanics or material -men for purposes of construction on the land described in Schedule A of this Commitment within the past 6 months. C. The Company must receive an appropriate affidavit indemnifying the Company against un -filed mechanic's and material -men's Liens. D. The Company must receive payment of the appropriate premium. E. If there has been construction, improvements or major repairs undertaken on the property to be purchased within six months prior to the Date of the Commitment, the requirements to obtain coverage for unrecorded liens will include: disclosure of certain construction information; financial information as to the seller, the builder and or the contractor; payment of the appropriate premium fully executed Indemnity Agreements satisfactory to the company, and, any additional requirements as may be necessary after an examination of the aforesaid information by the Company. No coverage will be given under any circumstances for labor or material for which the insured • has contracted for or agreed to pay. Nothing herein contained will be deemed to obligate the company to provide any of the coverages referred to herein unless the above conditions are fully satisfied. Form DISCLOSURE ENGINEERING REPORT • • • STATEMENTS REGARDING GRADLN G, ROADS AND UTILITIES LAKE SPRINGS P.U.D. PRELIMLNARY PLAN SUBMITTAL May 8, 2002 UTILITIES: Shallow Utilities: Electrical service will be provided by Holy Cross Electric. Phone service will be provided by U.S. West. Natural Gas Service will be provided by KN Energy. Water: Water will be provided by a well (or wells) and pumped to a 400,000 -gallon storage tank. The tank would be located at elevation 7202±and will provide working pressure at the highest fire hydrant of approximately 20 psi. Specifics for the proposed potable water system can be found in the Water Supply Investigation prepared by Zancanella & Associates, Inc. Fire flow protection provided by the tank will be 1500-gpm for two hours. Hydrants will be located as shown on the utility plan. Sewage Disposal: Sewage disposal will be provided by the Spring Valley Sanitation District. Sewage will be collected via an on-site collection system that will tie directly into an existing sewer main that was recently extended through the proposed development by others. The on-site collection system will utilize central gravity flow with several low-pressure sewer system branches. In the proposed low-pressure sewer system, each residence will have its own `E/one' grinder pump station that reduces all forms of sanitary waste to a non -clogging slurry. The waste is then pumped through a small diameter pressure pipe to the existing or proposed gravity system. The pressure pipe is located just below frost depth versus a gravity pipe up to 20 -feet deep. Since each pump on the system is located at a different point along the low pressure main, and at various elevations, the pumps are designed to work both individually and in unison with the other pumps to complete the passing of the waste to the gravity system. Since each pump's running time is short and power consumption is very low, a long pump life is ensured. In fact studies have shown that typical annual energy consumption equals a 40 -watt light bulb. The units are virtually maintenance free, and typically run eight to ten years between service calls. In the event of a power outage, the pump station is designed to hold the waste until power is resumed. and each pump station also has its own indoor & outdoor alarm system to notify the user of any potential problem. Low-pressure sewer systems have been in production for over 25 • years and are already in use in the neighboring Elk Springs Subdivision. A copy of the Spring Valley Sanitation District 'can and will serve' letter has been attached. Location of Utilities: - All standard rural utilities are already available adjacent to the site, including underground electric and telephone. Extensions can easily be made to service each proposed lot. The applicant will submit copies of this plat to the utility providers and comments will be requested. GRADING AND ROADS: Grading - No mass over -lot grading is proposed by the developer, and none is envisioned to be necessary. Roads/Traffic - All lots will have access directly to a public right-of-way. All roadways within the project will be public access roads privately maintained by the HOA, and will be built to Garfield County roadway standards. Plan and Profile drawings for the major access roads for the subdivision are included with this package. All proposed roads within the subdivision would be maintained and repaired, including snowplowing by the HOA. Surfacing on all roads within the subdivision will be chip and seal with a road base section as required by the geotechnical engineer. ID LEGAL ACCESS: This subdivision is accessed via County Road 114, which traverses through the property. PROPOSED USES: The proposed uses for the property will be agricultural/open space and residential single-family/cluster housing. DRAINAGE ON SITE See the attached Drainage Study prepared by High Country Engineering, Inc., dated April 2, 2002. • EES%�. 'r Project LAIC( 3pRi7,165 PUD By'WI VW Subject A Job No, 2.O Z b -2Pj Date Page of Date f)/ZS'°Z Ck'd by • Mill -7247Z ONL7-S )-7-106LE F,9-r,�z.y _ ,/9y CLIJ g2 -!T--c = /69 3 ,5 f se..,fvs /Do ,.x/c 2•G 4i L/ /0 PE -7+/i 4 /si vrr- F. -- e = 35O 1,‘I .J )c),2�/F'� �-G�7p2 ‹ o .e c -r .(l9L/ t /GY:3.5Y/co) = 7 3 50OFJ 1 :.:-.7C\ 7 < ,b) — , 22L SOC ° ° h!7-11. 4. ov2 1--:.74‘-1. PT. cLA) 1$U,Ccnapc' r 4s.,,,,, 77.21--.n,10.11ti FM �AID 0 k �.—.. 2'Ij�� Lf /io 75 0' h/=/3,0' M1 vruto /4 = Q,, . Vcc_u me = ylli Englewood, CO 14 Inverness Drive East Suite B-144 • Englewood, CO 80112 (303) 925-0544 phone • (303) 925-0547 fax Glenwood Springs, CO 923 Cooper Ave. • Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 (970) 945-8676 phone • (970) 945-2555 fax • • • LAKE SPRINGS, PUD Job No. 2021003.54 Watercad Analysis March 25. 2002 k:\wp\gprodata\file\202\1003\watercad.xls Single/Multi-family = 350 gpd/unit * 3.0 = 1050 gpd Junction # Units Total Demand (gpd) Total Demand (gpm) BLK1-LOT 13 13 13650 9.479 BLK1-LOT 18 5 5250 3.646 BLK1-LOT 3 4 4200 2.917 BLK2-LOT 13 6 6300 4.375 BLK2-LOT 16 6 6300 4.375 BLK2-LOT 6 0 0 0.000 BLK2-LOT 9 4 4200 2.917 BLK3-LOT 18 1 1050 0.729 BLK3-LOT 3 5 5250 3.646 BLK3-LOT 30 24 25200 17.500 BLK3-LOT 6 24 25200 17.500 BLK4-LOT 11 1 1050 0.729 BLK5-LOT 1 0 0 0.000 BLK5-LOT 28 9 9450 6.563 BLK5-LOT 29 0 0 0.000 BLK5-LOT 8 20 21000 14.583 BLK6-LOT 14 3 3150 2.188 BLK6-LOT 18 0 0 0.000 BLK6-LOT 21 4 4200 2.917 BLK6-LOT 24 6 6300 4.375 BLK6-LOT 25 3 3150 2.188 BLK6-L0T 34 18 18900 13.125 BLK6-LOT 35 (Cluster) 4 4200 2.917 BLK6-LOT 36 (Cluster) 4 4200 2.917 BLK7-LOT 10 1 1050 0.729 BLK7-LOT 15 11 11550 8.021 BLK7-LOT 20 0 0 0.000 BLK7-LOT 3 1 1050 0.729 BLK8-LOT 1 0 0 0.000 BLK8-LOT 16 (with Cluster) 24 25200 17.500 BLK8-LOT 20 (Cluster) 4 4200 2.917 BLK8-LOT 5 5 5250 3.646 Total 210 220500 153.125 Scenario: Lake Springs, PUD Fire Flow Analysis Junction Report Label Elevation (ft) Zone Type Base Flow (gpm) Pattern Demand (Calculated) (gpm) Calculated Hydraulic Grade (ft) Pressure (psi) BLK1-LOT13 6,929.00 Zone -1 Demand 9 Fixed 9 7,138.28 90.54 BLK1-LOT18 6,923.00 Zone -1 Demand 4 Fixed 4 7,138.28 93.14 BLK1-LOT3 6,933.00 Zone -1 Demand 3 Fixed 3 7,138.28 88.81 BLK2-LOT13 6,963.00 Zone -1 Demand 4 Fixed 4 7,138.29 75.84 BLK2-LOT16 6,923.00 Zone -1 Demand 4 Fixed 4 7,138.29 93.15 BLK2-LOT6 6,953.00 Zone -1 Demand 0 Fixed 0 7,138.30 80.17 BLK2-LOT9 6,942.00 Zone -1 Demand 3 Fixed 3 7,138.29 84.93 BLK3-LOT18 6,954.00 Zone -1 Demand 1 Fixed 1 7,138.35 79.76 BLK3-LOT3 6,937.00 Zone -1 Demand 4 Fixed 4 7,138.30 87.09 BLK3-LOT30 6,950.00 Zone -1 Demand 18 Fixed 18 7,138.30 81.47 BLK3-LOT6 6,950.00 Zone -1 Demand 18 Fixed 18 7,138.30 81.47 BLK4-LOT11 6,978.00 Zone -1 Demand 1 Fixed 1 7,138.37 69.38 BLK5-LOT1 7,149.00 Zone -1 Demand 0 Fixed 0 7,313.61 71.22 BLK5-LOT28 7,036.00 Zone -1 Demand 7 Fixed 7 7,246.89 91.24 BLK5-LOT29 7,057.00 Zone -1 Demand 0 Fixed 0 7,246.89 82.16 BLK5-LOT8 7.130.00 Zone -1 Demand 15 Fixed 15 7,313.60 79.43 BLK6-LOT14 7.200.00 Zone -1 Demand 2 Fixed 2 7,313.88 49.27 BLK6-LOT18 7.231.00 Zone -1 Demand 0 Fixed 0 7,313.94 35.89 BLK6-LOT21 7.236.00 Zone -1 Demand 3 Fixed 3 7,313.94 33.72 BLK6-LOT24 7.210.00 Zone -1 Demand 4 Fixed 4 7,313.88 44.95 BLK6-LOT25 7,191.00 Zone -1 Demand 2 Fixed 2 7,313.83 53.14 BLK6-LOT34 7.149.00 Zone -1 Demand 13 Fixed 13 7,313.61 71.22 BLK6-LOT35 7.160.00 Zone -1 Demand 3 Fixed 3 7,313.61 66.46 BLK6-LOT36 7.196.00 Zone -1 Demand 3 Fixed 3 7,313.83 50.98 BLK7-LOT10 7.057.00 Zone -1 Demand 1 Fixed 1 7,246.89 82.16 BLK7-LOT15 7,120.00 Zone -1 Demand 8 Fixed 8 7,313.47 83.70 BLK7-LOT20 7,113.00 Zone -1 Demand 0 Fixed 0 7,313.47 86.73 BLK7-LOT3 7.012.00 Zone -1 Demand 1 Fixed 1 7,138.41 54.69 BLK8-LOT1 6.952.00 Zone -1 Demand 0 Fixed 0 7,138.35 80.63 BLK8-LOT16 7.102.00 Zone -1 Demand 18 Fixed 18 7,246.87 62.68 BLK8-LOT20 6.956.00 Zone -1 Demand 3 Fixed 3 7,138.35 78.90 BLK8-LOT5 6,964.00 Zone -1 Demand 4 Fixed 4 7,138.35 75.43 Title: Lake Springs, PUD 2021003.54 Project Engineer: Deric WaIte- j:\sdskproj\202\1003\dwg\watercad.wcd High Country Engineering, Inc. WaterCAD v5.0 [5.00321 03/25/02 02:49:43 PM © Haestad Methods. Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Scenario: Lake Springs, PUD Fire Flow Analysis Valve Report Label Elevation (ft) Diameter (in) Minor Loss Coefficient Control Status Discharge (gpm) From HGL (ft) To HGL (ft) Headloss (ft) PRV-1 PRV-2 7,062.00 7,046.00 6.0 6.0 0.00 0.00 Throttling Throttling 100 75 7,313.37 7,246.88 7,246.91 7,138.45 66.46 108.42 Title: Lake Springs, PUD 2021003.54 Project Engineer: Deric Walter j:\sdskproj\202\1003\dwg\watercad.wcd High Country Engineering, Inc. WaterCAD v5.0 [5.0032] 03/25/02 02:54:30 PM © Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 1 of 1 • • Tank Report O 0 0 O 0 N C N a7 UU 0) c 0 oE — Q c m 0 O Q1 c c E� F- _ns 0 0 O Ec o E>- 2 0 O J _ 0 O r O N O 0, a) 0 N 0 N cas 4- o 0 ui a) U 01 'c o a5 o >a a W U Q1 0 Q. © Haestad Methods, Inc. 0 3 cei 0 O co O N 4) o N O rn —a 0 0 O N c O M c '' NO N O N J Y O_ N i Q1 0 N O • 0 Ct. Cr) C 673�c3 co O — LL O d c LL 0 V O 0 0 Headloss Gradient (ft/1000ft) r CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (0 0 0 r 0 N CO V 0 0 r N (O N 0 (D 0 N CO CO 0 0 r 0 N 1- O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 NI -1-1-0000000 r On- O N N O O N 0 O O O O O O O O O O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Pressure Pipe Headloss (ft) N n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO 0 0 O N (D (D 0 0 0 0 0 to 0 0 0 r N V 0 0 r N V V 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 0 N O O 0 0 O 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 O r r O O (6 O O 66666066 6606.6o O O O O O (6 O 0 O O O O 66000 0 0 0 0 Downstream Structure Hydraulic Grade (ft) N. n co O) O n to 0) 00 O co co 0) V' V 0) 0 0 0 (n (i) 0) (C) O (n n n c0 0) 0) n c0 co N N CO V' CO CO CO O CO CD CD CD CO CO m 0) N CO M CO CO CO CO CO CO CO et CO N N CO V M Co CO N CO CO M CO (D M M M M M M M M M 0) CO CO N CO (O (D CO 0 CO M M (O CO (D CO CO V CO CO CO CO r CO M CO CO CO CO CO N CO N CO CO r M CO N COM r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r N M N M COCOM M COCOCOCOCON N COCON _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _•_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n Upstream Structure Hydraulic Grade (ft) 0) O c0 0) O n U) 0) c0 'K co O co co V 0) 0) O O O t1) 0) (C) a) n n c0 CO (f) 1 - CO CO CO N N M V M CO CO 0) CO CD CD CD CD CO CO m N N CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CD V' N N CO V' V (D CO CO (O CO M CO (D M M M M M M M M M M CO CO CO co CO (O CO O 0 cO M M Co O (0 CO CO N co co co CO CO CO '7 CO CO M M CO M 'CrM V co r r M() .(1-.(1-M CO N CO N CO CO CO M CO CO CO M CO CO N N N CO CO N N- n• N- n N n r- r- n n N. rn r: rr N. r- N. N. N. N. r- rn r- n n• N. N- F- r.: n N Ns- sc0 Discharge (gpm) c°CD r V 1- (O 't n N M M M (CM 0) V 0 M 0 0 O 0) O M N n (nt7 c (0 0 O 0) (D O (0n Qn . Control Status C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C =C c C C C CC C c c C c ' C C C C C a) a) a) a) cu a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) (O a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) 0) a) a) a) a) 0) a a 0. a a a a a a a a a a 0 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 01. 01. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Minor Loss Coefficient o o O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 666606660006.00666660066066666066 0 0 0 Check Valve? CU a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) m a) a) a) (1) 0) (1) 0) 0) 0) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) N (0 N V) N (0 4) U) N 10 CO N N 4) 4) CA CO CO CO CO N (j) V) co CO 4) N CO (0 4) () N N (0 V) CD CO Co CD 03 Co CD CO CO CO CO CD N CD CD 00 CO CD 0) CO CO (D CO CD CO (0 CO (0 (0 CD CO CD (0 (C CO Hazen - Williams C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 o 0 0 06666666060666 66066660066666066660 o (n (n (n to to (n (n (n (n (n (n u) (n u) u) (n (n (n (n (n (n (n (n to (n to to (D to (n to to (n 0 0 Material 00000000000000000000000000000000000 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a Cl_ 0_ a a a n, a a a 0- Diameter (in) 00 0 o 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 O o O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 00 05 0) (O CO CO (O CO (b O N CO (O O (O O O O O O O O CO O N O CO W CO c0 O O (O CO (O CO Length (ft) co co co co O) 0) 0) 0) (f) V Tr a) O 40 n co n (D O O CO (D CO O 0 N N CO CO 0 CO O N CO (D CD V' n v co a Ti- N CO N (O Cr r 0 CO CC) O 0) 0 N (A CO TT OO CO CO CO V M 00 V (C) CO 0) N M CO (O V <! N (C) CO I' CO N r CO (D 0) CO M N N r r N N m CO 0 r N CO V' M) CO n CO 0) 0 r N CO [{ CO CO n CO CO 0 r N CO 7 (O r N M 1. u') CO n 00 N N N N N N N N N N CO co C') co co C7 a a. dada a_ a. a a d d d d d a d a. d d d d d d a d a_ a d a d a. d a d 2021003.54 0 0 0 u) 0 4') O N 0 0 n 0 0 c CJ T 0) C m a) c C (T s o W 3 � O a .0 Y 0) x DD co n M a co3 co 0 a) (0 • rn • a • M CO 0 m 0 0 O c a N (D d . O` N J 0 a) -c) N 1- © Haestad Methods, Inc. oul 'spoy;ayi pelsaeH p W W W W W W W WW W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W I- r r r r r r r r r r r- r r r r r r- r r r r- r r r r r r r r I- X X X X X' 7C X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X XX X XX X X X V r.) U Oo of O) W V 0) 0) -s 0) 01 N J U 0) CO CO 0) 03 U J A CO 0) CO 0) N N r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r 00000000000000000000000000000000 -1 -1 -I H -1 -1 -I -I -I -I -1 -1 -I -1 -1 -i -1 -1 -I -1 -1 -1 -1 -I -I -1 -I -I -1 -1 -1 -1 W co -, -• W-• CO N N CO -• N co W W N N N U W w N 0) A co 00000 W (0 0) 01 000 0)010O)010- A -, W r bc�' cp N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 00000000000000000000000000000000 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 CD (D (D (D (D CD (D (D (D (D (D (D (D (D (D (D CD (D (D (D (D (D (D (D (D (D (D (D (D (D (D (D h% R+ A V s Co Co V V 03 -4 - -4 -4 - 01 V J J J V V -• V CO V V V J A� J J V - Fire Flow Iterations C C C C 0 C C C C C 0 C C C C C C G C C C C C C C C C 0 C C C C (D (D (D (D (D (D (D (D (D (D (D (D (D (D (D (D (D (D (D (D (D (D (D CO (D (D (D (D (D (D (D (D Fire Flow Balanced? C G C C C G C C C 2 C C G G C C C C G C C C C C C C C C C C C C m m m m m ro (D (D CD m m m (o (D CD (D (D (D (D (D (D (D (D (D (D (D CD (D (D (D m m Satisfies Fire Flow Constraints? U N U ill U U U U in cn 01 N U U U 01 in ( (n (n in U1 U U in U U U cn U1 IT U 888,98888888888888888888888888888 Needed Fire Flow (gpm) N N N N N W N N N N CO N N N CO N N CO N N N N N N CO N N W W 0) W (0 0 W W A -CO 0) O J U W W O (0 0 W W 0 n W O) W W 01 W O W- CO W- Co 0) 0 W CO N W (0 0 0 A CO Co 03 U O CO W 0 N Co O CO W- W 0 Co O U U V U Co O U U O U O 0 -• 0 U U A A 0 U U 0 0 (T A U U V U 001 U D T T N 3 (D Q O in in in in in in in in in in in in in in in in in it in in in in in in in in in in in in in in i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o o 0) 0 0 0 0 ". -• o 0 o W 0 O N O A-, W W A N W (D 0 A co 01(,)-,C0 ) U W -• 0) o A CO V 0 -+ A W CO W 0 A (O (D T -♦ 0 (D O O * 3 (D m a N N N N N W N N N N- CO -+ - N N N -• CO N N CO -• N N N N N N CO N N W W -co W (O O W W A (00)00003(00(00(0 -co -co W W - W 0) O W W N W (D 0 0 U W W (D 0) 0 W 0 0 W A 0 W 0) W U 0 W O U V J U U 0 CO U Co J A N A 0 U (0 N N CO U N A O) -•A U CO ON) G) U (0 D (o so T -1 0= p O_ 3 0. i D) - V if N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 00000000000000000000000000000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 13 X (D 1:30 0) N N a ...-......-c, m m A co N A N N W W N N N CO N N W W N N 10 A CO CO N W N A N N W N W N W O A --, O (0 -s O O O O N O O CO CO O O O CO 0) -• O -+ W 0) CO A 0) CO A o . CO N U 0) 0 W U A 0 N 0 Co 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 Co O 0 A O 03 0 0 Co(0 COCJ ) 0) U A A A 0 N-, CO 0 N 0 Co 00 (0 0 0 0 W 0 V N O S W O N 0) V m N 0 Calculated Residual Pressure (psi) N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 00000000000000000000000000000000 0 O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 O o O 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 0 0 O O O O O Minimum Zone Pressure (psi) N N N N N N N N N N N N _N _W N N W W N N N N W N N N N N N N N CO 0000 V V O O (0 O O J O O O O V O O J O O O O O O (0 O O O O O O W O O N O V •V W O O N 6) O O V O O o 0 O O W 0 O O O O O O) O O N O c0 0) W A 0 0 0) N 0) 0 O 0) -• 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 (0 Calculated Minimum Zone Pressure (psi) 010101 W CO OO OW W W W W W OW W O7 07 01 W OW W W W W W OW OO CO W W W W W I- r r r r 1- r r- r- r r r r r r r 1- 1- r r r r r r r r- r r r r (- r coXXX7cxCo 0) co0) Cr)00 co0) 0) 0) COCOO) 0) 0) CO CO 0) 0) O) V 00 CO 0) 0) 0) CO 0) , , I , r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r I- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -1---I--1 -1 H -1 -1 � -1 H --1 H H H H H H H - -•1 H -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -4 - -i w j j .-.. N W j-• W -s -, ry .N.. .... .... W ( Q) O) U 0) 0) 0) 0) W 0) 0) CO0) 0) W U m 0) U 0) Co 0) Minimum Zone Junction (0(0(010(0(0(0(0(0(010101010(0(0(0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 00000000000000000000000000000000 O O O 666666666666666 o 6666666666666 O O O O o O O O O O O O O O 0 O O O o 0 O O 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 O O Minimum System Pressure (psi) N N N N N N N N N N N N N W N N CO CO N N N N W N N N N N N N N W O O O o V V O O CO o O J --. -• 0 0 0 0 V 0 o V- 0 0 0 0 0 0 (0 00 O O O O W -+ O O N O J.- J •W O O N U -+ O O .- V 0 0 0 0 0 W 000000)00N)0(.00)01 A 0001(00)000) -• 000co Calculated Minimum System Pressure (psi) CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO W CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO W CO CO CO CO CO CO W CO CO CO CO r r 1- r r r r r r r r r r r r r r- r r- r r r r r r r r r r r r r Oo W 0) OD 0) Cr) OD CO 0) 0 -+ 0) -• -• OD OD 0) m 0) OD Oo O) 0) 03 J W CO 0) CO 0) CO 0) rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -1 -I -I --I - I -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 - H -i -I -1 - H -1 - - - -1 --1 H j-1 j -I -1 w J -- CO- () -, -s -, j 41 rn rn 010rn rn rn w m m rn rn m U rn rn N rn ao rn Minimum System Junction podej mold acid • • • -v o TIVJS DIHdV21D MAIN Ii 0 GI- O co co BERKELEY FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO LAKE SPRINGS, P.U.D. WATERCAD ANALYSIS JUNCTION/PIPE LAYOUT HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC. _ 1517 BLAKE AVENGE, STE 101 W INVERNESS DOTE EAST. STE. D136 - GLENWOOD SPRINGS. CO 81601 ENGLEWOOD. CO 6082 P1((970) 945-8676 PH.(303) 926-0554 FX(970) 945-2555 FX(303) 925-0547 DES. DJW N0. DATE DR. DJW CK. DATE 3/25/02 FILEWATERCAD REVISION BY • • SEWER SYSTEMS Environment One Corporation Pressure Sewer Preliminary Cost and Design Analysis For Lake Springs, PUD: Phase 1 Lake Springs Drive Prepared For: Berkeley Family Limited Partnership 3961 County Road 114 Glenwood Springs CO 81601 Tel: (970) 945-5432 s Prepared By: Deric Walter, EI March 12, 2002 Lake Springs, PUD: Phase 1 Lake Springs Drive Prepared by : Deric Walter. EI On: March 12, 2002 Notes : Lake Springs, PUD 2021003.54 3/11/02 • • ««< END OF NOTES »»> N N 2 O M N 'O N in vO Vl oo M O O O O O 0 0 0 0 kr; I ▪ E O O O O O E • G.2 y 0 O O O O E E :a ''3 O i.16 M 4 00 .c ` u C O O oo M M - 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 :a o ,z0000 0 c In un tr, tan in 4 V 0 0 0 0 0 o • O M N %O r- -o. •p D, [` kr, o0 C%1 is • O n l� �O 4 4 — c C 0 Q Q _ c Z o ' Q N 4r-.--4coN� 1 • c - ._ o 00 N O 'Tr z o N v N y y .0 :E o O n r = C` M qo r1 [— z o .-r N v'"! qO D` C7 zL. N O.. • L p O O O O O Llj t.4 OOOOo O.. 00000 E-,..... O�nc00 g March 0002 00 N ^ I-- VO ti N •^ M VO Z SC oorico�cc (--.1 V1 V' oo LL3 0 d E-• 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z _ tn0.n0O LSI M N ^ M H M lO CO Li] n cl to R L O c Q i/a. c. PRELIMINARY PRESSURE SEWER vis v Length o1'/one V') ^ M 0 V M O 7 N C. 0 0 0 0 o c c o c O C O o 0 Otnvoo I` 7 v 0o000 Crnsioo0o ^ ^ tr) 1n O O O Si •• N N h O O ro ^ •--• ^ N N 0 1 L Q L y G. • '0 no ^ N Cs 00 '0- u ^ N j S = R U vs u 0 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 W ^ 0 3 Si n v ri -4 ai L ^ v th0 0 0 0 0 v . P. 0 0 0 .- .T+ N 1'N MLA c3 0 P Z p .nvironment One Budgetary Low Pressure Sewer System Costs • Lake Springs, PUD: Phase 1 • • Valves Lake Springs Drive Quantity Description 2 2.00" Isolation Valve 24 Redundant Check Valve 24 Corp Stop 2 Aii7Vacuum Mease Valve 2 -Clean Out 6 2.50" Isolation Valve March 12, 2002 Unit Cost Sub Total $600.001,2 0.00 S-200�0 $4,800.00 T800.00 $19,200.00 $3,500.00 $7,000.00 T2,800.00 $3,600.00 $600.00 $3,600.00 —541 ;4110.00 Pumps 24 Lateral Kits $86-0.00 $19,200.00 24 1.255Pipe Laterals $0.00 $0.00 24 ' Pump/Panel Installation $1,500.00 $36.000.00 24 2010-93 $2,927.00 $70.248.00 ST25,448-0-_ Piping 150 1.25" Pipe $18.00 $2.700.00 440 1.50" Pipe $18.50 $8,140.00 2,200 2.00" Pipe $20.00 544,000.00 S54,840. U0 Other 10 Contingencies $22.168.80 522,T68.80 Total Per Home $9,237.00 ToalWithout Otter »»»»»»»> $221.688.00 -- Grand Total Per Home $10,160.70 Total Including Other »»»»»»» S243,856.80 Note: The System Costs above are based on piping sized for, and Grinder Pumps manufactured by Environment One Corporation. Page 1 • • SEWER SYSTEMS Environment One Corporation Pressure Sewer Preliminary Cost and Design Analysis For Lake Springs, PUD: Phase 1 Van Cleve Lane Prepared 1. or: Berkeley Family Limited Partnership 3961 County Road 114 Glenwood Springs CO 81601 (970) 945-5432 Prepared By: Deric Walter, EI March 12, 2002 Lake Springs, PUD: Phase 1 Van Cleve Lane Prepared by : Deric Walter, EI On: March 12, 2002 Notes : Lake Springs, PUD 2021003.54 3/12/02 • • ««< END OF NOTES »»> Mall 2, 2002 Q (�l0 N O 00 -- r N E:- O O L C = M M re N >, y M 2 0 tn O o O O O Y"0 '� O O O O Re.) Iy y y N t- M 00 7J E c 0 0 0 0 0 = c.9 ) O O O O E ER 'o iT C. C�i .7t: c c O — 1p (� O (� 'm o O O O O R ti> N N N N 'o -- ^ _ _ oG L 3cn> over Y �f ca kr) v— ri C v6 C/) �C• L[1 > C4 �O N M M M Tt N Et v� M O N ,M. O N M N n N' O O O O O O O O 0 o C o - ^ = E n 2cO U1 O O O N v • 0 0 0 0 O O o O N M -- N M vt > 0. 0. N O 0 0 0 c y a 0 0 0 0 `O >, I) °' O O O O c08 0 0 0 O 0 v 0 0 0 0 ofy V'1 V'1 In ('j 0. e M M M M 'O U L p 0 e> Li o ` N t.0 0 O a Z o •E o oO O O O 411, y a>R0 O O O o % N 00 O C = N T y 0. .= R A O O O O -F1 o y y o 0 0 0 �' o . Vo r; 00 Cr; cC U N 7 . cu Z a0 q) 00 "0' ice, M CT in O O O 03 i c C 00 Cr ^ M rn Ct rr 0 0 0 0 ce v U R 'C L Ot` O, M -. 7 00 M 01 ‘p = _ r 4 N r N krl 00 :3c] v a G ro v P U z Q 0 U 0 E- 0 0 0 0 0 z c�. v,, v-, in v> GUrn O •-- 00 F. > ^ ri -- LU C C4 v 0 co LU — J c DC. = O Cr.M M vl Q c N D, O Un. > Q C> r c ti C.) W W O O O O O O O O o CU N OPV O LU cC ti C/] CU CG © '^ OO. p O O CG ca. _ ) C. -)z > iN 3 = WN_ cG ` telO O O at.. __ N u 72 Existing J C. CD ..--- M O\ r-. o N . 1 7 `� J < ' V 1 ti p o O O O O O O O O Z n p t� 00 O\ O. N .c iiiO O O O U y O O O O UO E ,4 b - 00 p1 N'% N = _ 1 a, z a C manufactured by Environment Oii Budgetary Low Pressure Sewer System Costs • Lake Springs, PUD: Phase 1 Van Cleve Lane • Valves Pumps Piping Quantity Description 3 2.00" Isolation Valve 11 ReFund t Check Valve 1 1 Corp Stop 1 Clean Out I1 Lateral -Kits 1 1 1.25" Pipe Laterals I1 Pump -Panel Installation 1 I 2010-93 60 1.25" Pipe 780 1.50" Pipe Other 10 Contingencies March 12, 2002 Unit Cost Sub Total 5600.00 $1,800.00 S200.00 S2.200.00 S800.00 $8.800.00 $2.800.00 52.800.00 -S1-5.600.00 5800.00 50.00 $1,500.00 $2827.00 S 18.00 S18.50 $8.800.00 $0.00 $16,500.00 $32.197.00 S57J97.00 - S1.080.00 $14.430.00 SI 5.510.00 $ 886070 S8.W60.70 Total -Per Home S8;055.18 Total -Without Other »»»»»»»> S88.607.00 Grand Total Per Home S8,860.70 Total Including Other »»»»»»» S97.467.70 Note: The System Costs above are based on piping sized for. and Grinder Pumps manufactured by Environment One Corporation. Page 1 • • one SEWER SYSTEMS Environment One Corporation Pressure Sewer Preliminary Cost and Design Analysis For Lake Springs, PUD: Phase 2 High Alpine Drive Prepared IN or: Berkeley Family Limited Partnership 3961 County Road 114 Glenwood Springs CO 81601 (970) 945-5432 PR. Prepared By: Deric Walter, EI March 12, 2002 Lake Springs, PUD: Phase 2 High Alpine Drive Prepared by : Deric Walter, EI On: March 12. 2002 Notes : Lake Springs, PUD 2021003.54 3/12/02 • ««< END OF NOTES »»> ry CZ, CD V •.' O N :° R viri v-: 46 , > 6J o S 0 on 0 O O 2 741.)Ncn O or)i I C o O O O O O E p•.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 E E> 17'4MMO0•- 'E G> > '7c M M O O ON 2 ri. N N N N- r`S--t- r -sr - _ 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 ` o' c O. o D WI In WI Vn vo 1 t U c l� l� c--= J--: r- C" LLo • r- N 00 N O 0' N to et N M N oo 0 0 0 O 0 O O O O O In Ct 'q' M M c p 2 > O O O c_ N O 0' h tfl r 0 O 0' r` N O 0 0` N c p - c,- — rN H -0 - lle)r- oo Oo M N 0 Oc.6— O d' O M •-- '•'1 R N O O c 00 00 'cp y, .0 u v Z y, v 3 4' <c. c Z p Q rr- en ••z- In r- oo ten N C1 -'c C R M c N M M r- ten - C 1 J c p O N O .O O M r- z N V N :4. _E- 0 - pc - Z :„.0 — to -- — rO V'1 c lin N Z Q C`1 C O ..--- rl 4- N N- M kr; :.7 p V - z L R]> - _ a - 'n6- a. N -3.-: '5 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c 0 c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 M Cl O N o -'00 O''J10c 0 0 In 0 0 000,00 00 N en 7 N M M N 4 V•1 v., 0 0 v O o 0 o =+ v N v, N v, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N M - N et M In VO - CV M - M ten �O '-- N M - Cd 71• M V'1 kc) E c U 2 cn 0 0. " 0 0 0 0 ` 0 c4 00 0 0 0 u., U� 0 0 0 0 o O o O 2 L O p ivs - Z.: G. R M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 t, In if) vi in V'1 kn ken M M M M M M M M -L., G �--' M c- M In •=i- 0 00 y c a M M ,� C O N 00 E U E may :J V V 7 — L - 7 G o - U N R z o .•E c V rlNMS^00 _�`, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O� n- m 0 0 C 0 0 0 O O O C C N $ -- N tr.;tn [- t- o0 00 v co. -.t. O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -0 - , ` O o O o 0 o O o 0 i c a 0 — N M 4 V7 'O N 00 CCS Vc •'_ N z N00 M •---. O N 40 in .-- to �1 2 v N— — N— ^— O O C Q CC Q j 2 N C O '-o'^ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 v, ai v y no c V. F - v Q 1. O Cr,O +.^. .O O r Cr, .7 r D` N q0 C Cr, M Li') M C ..i 01 In in N r.1 q0 M un D, W v C — G 4 u J > r OZ. Q v ZO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W M O M O N Tr, Cn M W Ce 7'7 0 w W N Q R C _] a C) ‘.0 — 'Cr •71"C` 1 (n rr M M ZD Z o o - M 00 N N r-MC0' 0i �tr.;r', r- r - ` M y o — — O a = T Q o q AP1 .J 04 W Cn i O O O O C O o o 0 O O O O ... 0 0 0 0 N oc � o o-- o o o' CA ,, 'o •-- v r:1' N O [--- U2 W — 04 il ZD 5 vD _ rn a v r r- rr r- Tr Tr T' v CD CL. = — O O — C 00 00 00 00 D,,, — :., 0\ CV N 0' r o0 00 00 00 v ..<:., Tz r... u V 'Z+ �_ > G R 0: _ V N 0: J CL v in O N tP N 6. t O O O O a- P j �-- N N N ` N :7 7 6 un 'n CN 'n rr N '7 00 M r N 0. ,y pp •-- M 0' .— M in .Tr o 00 C v M M v Q E=, o O v 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O C O 0 0 0 a =v 3 - Ni 1 rr tr. r r 00 00 - r' E 0 0 0 o C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 L L d O Nr,-; Ti in �O o0 Cd C.) C ❑. • L+ N 3 N z ivii(>nment ()lie Budgetary Low Pressure Sewer System Costs • Lake Springs, PUD: Phase 2 • • High Alpine Drive Quantity Description March 12, 2002 Unit Cost Sub Total Valves 9 2.0Vailaiim Valve $600.00 $5,400.00 38 Redundant Check Valve - $200.00 $7,600.00 38 Corp Stop -- $800.00 $30,400.00 1 AirNacuum Release Valve $3,500.00 $3,500.00 4 Clean Out $2800.00 $11,200.00 SSS,TIf0:6O Pumps 38 Lateral -Kits $800.00 $30,400.00- 3 1.25" Pipe Laterals $0.00 $0.00 Pump/Panel Installation $1,500.00 $57,000.00 38 2010-93 $2,927.00 $111,226.00 5118,626.00 Piping 70 1.25" Pipe $18.00 $1,260.00 Other 9-50 1.50" Pipe 2,440 2.00" Pipe $18.50 $17,575.00 120.60 $48,800.00 S67,635.0f 10 Contingencies 132,436.10 TotiTPer Home S8,535.82 'Dotal Without Other »»»»»»»> Grand Total Per Home $9,389.40 Total Including Other »»»»»»» 532,436.10 S32436E00— $356,797.10 Note: The System Costs above are based on piping sized for, and Grinder Pumps manufactured by Environment One Corporation. Page 1 • • SEWER SYSTEMS Environment One Corporation Pressure Sewer Preliminary Cost and Design Analysis For Lake Springs, PUD: Phase 2 High Alpine Circle Prepared 14 or: Berkeley Family Limited Partnership 3961 County Road 114 Glenwood Springs CO 81601 AN: (970) 945-5432 Prepared By: Deric Walter, EI March 12, 2002 • • • Lake Springs, PUD: Phase 2 High Alpine Circle Prepared by : Deric Walter, EI On: March 12, 2002 Notes : Lake Springs, PUD 2021003.54 3/12/02 ««< END OF NOTES »»> NI M r- O 1O N O •£ 00 O N 'O 'O N 4 0 ` asONO 000 M cS o o • O o o O o 3 'V C. y0000Q V V tlccN4ricv v3 Z" L N 4 4 N c0 = • p••0 c., • 0 0 O O 0 E E 7 ? [� N M 4•ca=. v �N _ _ M f L. c c 00 0 0 0 -Fap Y 0 0 0 0 0 g > =ON I!1 V1 V1 in O M b 0 VO N -m •p 00 0 N VO t0 p y O .O O N :n = -J .c 0 ..:3-..:3-M A c V >- . L � ' V Z 0 I Q y 6 r- M O r- -,- oy s r- 00 V•1 O to = v ,_M V1 DO N Z. c N • N wlN V = — 2 — C z p v) O vl N 7 J p z c�'a • 3 R1 a ea) — ▪ L 0 0 0 0 0 x. 3 0 0 0 0 O >' ca p „ N M 7 V1 Q 2 C:. 5 N M "et len z N M Ch In E n U , rI co O 0 0 0 x3 gpa;p` OO0000 0 6) 0 O 3- 3 r 3 1.2 • 21.aUv >, c 0 �0 �00000 :� 0 P, C..) = co; oco; oo = to 0 G M r1 r1 M M A IF .y C G.-- M lT 00 N U u p c. U Nc y C — c Cr, N 0 p 3 (J N a Z o R � 1111 0 Q 0 0 0 0 0 y o 0 o O o c. N ;) N N N N N T y 4,3 s r R O O O O b . o O O o 0 b V- N c 'a 0, O N M m V ,V 2 r- N N N N LCL • z C. m O z 0 ceE E F• - u N CO O h Os rt. G\ ^ O t1 O WI �p oo� O O C T N M O R Vl MVD 1/40 en 'n 00 ND c' -y a� N tt N a 00 rn • 1 Q• = Length of Zone Capacity of Zone Average Daily Flow 00 0 0 0 0 v-1 O O C1 O M O M 1O I� 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 M C 00 O N C) O 0 0 0 0 Qo 0 0 0 0 0 3ry ONr1NN 0 N v G .0 0 0 0 0 0 • 0 0 0 0 0 V N fV N N z C > U 'l. • 'l. 0 a_ 0 1. 'l. J774 .74 0 O >- 'l. z • 1 Quantity Description Budgetary Low Pressure Sewer System Costs Lake Springs, PUD: Phase 2 High Alpine Circle March 12, 2002 Unit Cost Sub Total Valves 3 2.00" Isolation Valve Pumps $600.00 $1,800.00 20 Redundant Check Valve $200.00 S4,000.00 20 Corp Stop $800.00 $16,000.00 1 AirNacuum Release Valve $3.500.00 S3,500.00 2 Clean Out 2.50" Isolation Valve $2,800.00 $5,600.00 S600-.0-0 51,800.00 S32,700.00- 20 Lateral Kits $800.00 $16,000.00 20 1.25' ipe atera s 20 Pump/Panel Installation I.I0 $1,500.00 :0.00 $30,000.00 20 2010-93 $2,927.00 $58,540.00 Piping 150 1.25" Pipe 740 1.50" Pipe 940 2.50" Pipe $104,546.130 S18.00 S18.50 S20.50 52,700.00 $13,690.00 $19,270.00 $35,660.00 Other 10 Contingencies $17.2 (x.00 ST7,,Z90.00 Vital Perer ome $8;645.00 ---TotaT Without Other »»»»»»»> SI72,900:00 $190,190.00 Grand Total Per Home $9,509.50 Total Including Other »»»»»»» Note: The System Costs above are based on piping sized for, and Grinder Pumps manufactured by Environment One Corporation. Page 1 • SEWER SYSTEMS Environment One Corporation Pressure Sewer Preliminary Cost and Design Analysis For Lake Springs, PUD: Phase 2 Lake Springs Court Prepared For: Berkeley Family Limited Partnership 3961 County Road 114 Glenwood Springs CO 81601 (970) 945-5432 11Fx: Prepared By: Deric Walter, EI March 12, 2002 • • • Lake Springs, PUD: Phase 2 Lake Springs Court Prepared by : Deric Walter, EI On: March 12, 2002 Notes : Lake Springs, PUD 2021003.54 3/12/02 ««< END OF NOTES »»> NE SILINIi ANL) BRANCH ANALYSIS PICELIwIINARY PRESSURE SEWER - P CT O .(>._^ I .Nv ON r9 E " tO in _. ° t, in ri ? • oo,nc o �^ N co co L R .. OO V1 h—,0 N N on' E 0 a o..2 0 o co co, c E a 9 to to E = 0 E O O O 2 — !` c O O O = O O O i v O O O L rZ A i N t-- c ---10 -- o N IT 0 -= H a o\ y ra O t6 N N N c to — U 1 Q L:. C o y R M0 O o v,= N N 0 .-z= R O O N.2 N o N o I c N ^ '--1E o ^ N4 N c p U Q. 2400 Ca U0 0 0 v' c 4 0 0 0 ,U c N tock c Vc c.- N M 4.. J — cl N '� E a g N 0 a 1 go„00000 O >, 1 °" O O O p O O O U ;y0 O O U n az c M M M E7 -5—:--I en as— = N c.) I 1 ` p C ¢UN c i { N v ` c II ^ N 1/40 o o SUN io = _ �m -. H 0 O O ctO O O 0 . u E `o v� to b z N N N p m R O O O •p j p y ` O O O in uj CI U N 3 " N N N M. 'C z Cr. C] 1 Note: This analysis is valid only with the use of progressive cavity type grinder pumps as manufactured by Environment One. 00 h O O M — cY 1n O O O M 00 N N [. N V W J c. Note: This analysis is valid only with the use of progressive cavity type grinder pumps as manufactured by Environment One • Quantity Description Budgetary Low Pressure Sewer System Costs Valves 3 2.00" Isolation Valve Lake Springs, PUD: Phase 2 Lake Springs Court 9 Redundant Check Valve 9 Corp Stop 1 AirNacuum Release Valve 1 Clean Out Pumps 9 Lateral Kits 9 1.25" Pipe Laterals 9 Pump/Panel Installation 9 2010-93 March 12, 2002 Unit Cost Sub Total $6000 $1,800.00 $2-00.00 $1,800.00 $800.00 $7,200.00 $3,5-0.00 53,500.00 $2800.00 $2,800.00 $T7T00.00 $800.00 $7,200.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,500.00 $13,500.00 $2,927.00 Piping 20 1.25" Pipe 650 1.50" Pipe —S47,043.011— $18.00 $360.00 $18.50– $12,025.00 $13,385.00 • Other 10 Contingencies $7.652.80 $7,652.80 • fot ieP r FPome $8,503.11 Total Without Other »»»»»»»> $76-,528X0— Grand 76,5280WGrand Total Per Home $9,353.42 Total Including Other »»»»»»» $84,180.80 Note: The System Costs above are based on piping sized for, and Grinder Pumps manufactured by Environment One Corporation. Page 1 • • SEV ER SYSTEMS Environment One Corporation Pressure Sewer Preliminary Cost and Design Analysis For Lake Springs, PUD: Phase 3 Rivendell Road Prepared For: Berkeley Family Limited Partnership 3961 County Road 114 Glenwood Springs CO 81601 Tik (970) 945-5432 Prepared By: Deric Walter, EI March 12, 2002 Lake Springs, PUD: Phase 3 Rivendell Road Prepared by : Deric Walter, EI On: March 12, 2002 Notes : Lake Springs, PUD 2021003.54 Phases 3 3/12/01 • • ««< END OF NOTES »»> 0 -- <0 M O N N - c -a C LA— 00 N N E° >, y r- l— r-- L N Q = o 0 0 0 0 0 0 y y 0 0 0 0 O `e ° a) 0 Oo tri '7 00 (r;rn i U. .c M M M N - 0n ' 1 0 E c 2 0 0 0 0 0 o Q,? y 0 O co O O EER b d r— oo, bo co_> 1/40 va rto 2 L �0 .9 � �0 0 a c0 0 0 0 0 0 o 00000'; ti N N N N C1 2 0 0 O O O oo U tT , c M 0 t— k0 N r— O t—: C ri• rel en y 1 LS d 3 c1 0 c 74 an o a c0i c 0 o y y I o 0 L 0 ;S. C 0 u t� 0 M O c O cu O U cn s a 0 - o ticC _c N enc 0 R NI 11 2 •L a cipc4 PRELIMINARY PRESSURE SEWER t� O O N M e* N t� M N 1 V1 N — 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 sornVo O Ct N a, N O O CT co M N M N M ton CO 0 0 0 CI. r Cl h O O tri n — — N N N 00000 x 3 2 O O co co co 0L — N M 'cr V•1 u U — N M v tr g E a — N M v) i 0 U > ' I y 3 O 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 2u. n•Uv: 0 `-00000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 R M M M M 7 c u 0 Q U N -. 0 U n c U N z (5 •n y ia 0 — 0 ccol o N M O co 30o N N 0 0 y o 0 O is o0 o E N N N 29.001 30.00 30.001 31.00 —31.00" 31.00 This analysis is valid only with the use of progressive cavity type grinder pumps as manufactured by Environment One. 7 0 ne Q • r 7 oe 3 O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 w 1 ` O O O O O C\ 4D et 00 ,ct r— 00 00 N 00 10 0 10 O M N -- -- O c CT O 1per 00 M 1.0 %O M O O O O O E > O 00 '7 C` O 00 O M yr rt O; 1/40 [— M M N M M MO O O o 0 0 In in tn 0 in M O M O 00 �O 00 N O N • N O M 'O [� .O ^ ^ 00 6 Length i e' C` rt et- O _ ^ O 00 00 qO Q: N 00 00 N } � U ^ N c - L > J ry M C 00 M — 0,-) c O O O O 'n 0 0 0 O O nc 300 G; O r- .� 7 1iN N M M M >> j 0. U y n 0 ,.. U aO O O O O C L tiN: 00 0; O QL NO 3 '4 N. N N M M Z 1 a. CU Budgetary Low Pressure Sewer System Costs • Lake Springs, PUD: Phase 3 Rivendell Road Quantity Description Valves 4 2.00" Isolation Valve Pumps 23 Redundant C Check Naive 23 Corp Stop 4 AirNacuum Release Valve 1 Clean Out 2.50" Isolation Valve March 12, 2002 Unit Cost Sub Total $600.00 $2,400.00 $200.00 $4,600.00 $800.00 $18,400.00 S3,500.00 $14,000.00 23 Lateral Kits :11.11 . :11.11 $600.00 $1,200.00 5443;400.00 $800.00 $18,400.00 ipe atera s 23 Pump/Panel Installation 23 /010-93 Piping 110 125" Pipe 110 1.50" Pipe 1,3502.00" Pipe • 460 2.50"Pipe • Other 10 Contingencies fitaTPer Home S8,872.43 $1,500.00 $34,500.00 S2,927.00 567,321.00 S 120,221:06 $18.00 S1,9g0.00 $18.50 S2,033.00 $20.00 S27,000760 -- S20.50 27,000 00520.50 S9 430.00 540,445 0O 'I of iWithout Other »»»»»»»> Grand Total Per Home $9,759.68 Total Including Other »»»»»»» $204406.60 S20,406.60 5204066.00 5224,472.60 Note: The System Costs above are based on piping sized for, and Grinder Pumps manufactured by Environment One Corporation. Page 1 • SEWER SYSTEMS Environment One Corporation Pressure Sewer Preliminary Cost and Design Analysis For 1 Lake Springs, PUD: Phases 4-5 Spring Valley Rd/Ct/Dr/Place and Rivendell Ct. Prepared r'or: Berkeley Family Limited Partnership 3961 County Road 114 Glenwood Springs CO 81601 T (970) 945-5432 Prepared By: Deric Walter, EI March 12, 2002 • • • Lake Springs, PUD: Phases 4-5 Spring Valley Rd/Ct/Dr/Place and Rivendell Ct. Prepared by : Deric Walter, EI On: March 12, 2002 Notes : Lake Springs, PUD 2021003.54 Phases 4-5 3/12/01 ««< END OF NOTES »»> Malt, 2002 0.- PRELIMINARY PRESSURE SEWER 0 v > c U yvVD h0 M o C cV 0o 00 Q = N 00 J r. • ri on m E c E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 a•° y 0 0 0000000000000 0 0 EE E ? 00 0o O N N N_ t-:. Cr N O vi S. t` c). O h •_ = t .—N O tri h M N N N N M N Ej D\ O T O. O. 0. O, O( 07 G� 0 ^ O N ON CN CN CN c0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 s 0 c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 2 R �'(6 b(6 tD t0 t0 (6 tD N N 4 t0 O O O N N > 'C to N h !n V1 h kin trll0 t0 In in in into d' 'Ci' a y fJ ch C' O o to t O` Cr, 0 O 0' O 0' 0' 0' ON O 0\ O 0' 2 =L R to to to tc to to to ,o to to tD o -- tp N oo — 00 — 00 N — 4 N r cN • O•o t0 M VD "ct O's 4n N 00 !n 4-400 t0 0 ▪ N V1 M 00 00 t� N in if; N ^ 00 t0 V'1 ' t O M y t�0, v C N o Co -1 00 +^o• o N n M 'ct h0 P 01 i—� t M Vl 0' 0 00 in NO 00 N 00 00 oo 00 in in in V'1 V'1 in in M M i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O 00 t: 4 4 r e s O N cr; ^ M M f --'N N M M rl T r M rt - -- M N N N 7- 4 in M • C ✓ 71 NI V'1 cn N M N O l— O M [— 0rs 00 ON 0' t0 N 4.0 N N M N 0 'Cr N O t Vl O ri it 06 O V o0 00 O— J vl 'ct Lin C4InD S -- L V N V1 N- c/•1 O N- f 1 4 O— N -T O— N 'c7 O- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 t N t0 rY 0 00 in C 1/40 0 cn O kr) N — Ot M 00 — O Tr N t0 O Tr t0 T' O Tr VD 01 O 'ct VD 0' ,r O O C O O O vl Cl O O vl 1/40O O lel 1/41DN Cr; CV N N M 7 C'1 N M4 N N M,t N ri VI 0 0 0 in 0 0 in O 0 0 N O O O O N N O to N vl in O N (/ L O N 11'1 N O O M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - N ri Ct - N M V•1 — N M t0 — N ri t0 — N M 1- N M v"1 - CV M t0 — N M t0 N 1 - N M 4— N M N N M 1/40 ▪ N M 1p N E n O i > y p O 2x= QUO is :.J V G - C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 °°000000.°0000000. O O O O O O O 0 O O O O vl H c/1 �n M M M M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 tenI/'1 N in in in Vl in vl M M M F.. y y o^ M Ga, M— M h S— M r M N O N P y o E. N ( !n t0 - N oA C 1 •y • N 1/40 V— N N D, '-- N t ;• - N N oo 0 o v - v N is z o •c 3 U i 2. t.:, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c^ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • M 4 i/1 0' s DO 01 M 7 N M t� Ir t0 C- 0006 E N y M M M M Mm M r - �t r: ct 'Ct • et rf J y o z Jr 1:400000000000000 0 0 0 L., 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N M et V1 tG N 00 0' O — N M 4 to 1/40 t� 00 `� M cn M r1 M r1 M M V' t7 V •cr !c- '[1' <- 7:1 ref March 0002 Lu Ca L kID O N M r+ 40 ,r) cn ON rr 0o M M in .— vn 'Tt 0, O t-- M r- r- v1 c t� a 'VO in O vi lt' 4 M 4 M M M N N Q Q Co Cr O\ O O O O tin O v7 N vy N v1 S O 00 et N t NUl N N N ^ vn 71' v1 O r- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O N b M O O N O\ O O '.D M O 00 M tt tT O\ v1 t� Cr, 00 O\ t� ten \o M N 01 M M v1 t--: T Q; O V) N O 1/46 ' M 1/40 M v1 00 O Cr N 00 'er M O, v'- N ^ ON et O M 0, 'er T:r v- �r - N • r - i I o o O o o O O O O O O O o O p b 0 O v1 vl vl v1 v'1 In v1 v1 V1 lin O v) v1 ten v1 O O �"M O v1 M O N M O .- Cr M O C !n b 'Fs 1F. M �' 1 r r- D, I N N i— r- I I N v m y c • Tr N 1/4/6D v1 '.— oo O`1/40 4 M D ` ^ 'rr ^ N '.0 o is VD O O kD ^ ^ [t UD ^ r- v1 UD N N VD ‘.0 N N M VD T M 00 — i M N N 00 M M.- 00 O .-- ^ , to M M Tr o0. U O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a o 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c o M M N Tr Tr Tr vl N O V O 00 v1 Tr 1D O v1 CN `` M v1 .- ^ M N ^ D` M oo .- s o Tr r 'Cr O !t' t- t- O Tr t- N O '7' t- N O O o ^ O 00 kD O O Os ^ O O Cr, — O O ON CN v O\ N00 t� O, N fV 0 O. N N O O` N N O O o. Gi •-- ^ N ^ -- •-- -1. CA R U o c R C7 'r -Zi NI If O O O v1 O O O N O O O v1 0 0 0 0 7) : N v1 O v1 N r v1 O N v1 ut O N h !!1 O O o • ^ •--� (NI r •--" • r" M — •-• ;- C1 •-- •-• ;- M M a 01) L 1 1 O C N @ X W G:. y �C '3 y MD v `-°U c E o ..o 3 _ ti ti 1 c, `� L U A o ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 'Tr 'q' M Cr M !-• M v1 S '-- N LD t-- ^ � I MUn !n O n c 3Md v1rn�b0o;ri 2 • N ".-.7; M M M en M M M Cr t O O N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M N v1 %.6 t� 00 00 Tr Tr v Tr Tr 71- v CD CD CD CD CD Cn CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD u cO O O o o 0 o o o 0 p o o o o 0 ai N M Ti H S N 00 Cr; O �--� N M Ti h 'l6 N 00 0 3 = M M M M M M M M '7' !r Tr .4 er Tr .4 tt Tr z 1 1 1 • i Note: This analysis is valid only with the use of progressive cavity type grinder pumps as manufactured by Environment One Budgetary Low Pressure Sewer System Costs • Lake Springs, PUD: Phases 4-5 Spring Valley Rd/Ct/Dr/Place and Rivendell Ct. • • March 12, 2002 Quantity Description Unit Cost Sub Total Valves 4 ! 2.00" Isolation Valve S600.00 S2,400.00 10 3.00" Isolation Valve $600.00 S6,000.00 62 Redundant Check Valve $200.00 $12,400.00 62 Corp Stop $800.00 $49,600.00 9 AirNacuum Release Valve $3,500.00 $31,500.00 4 Clean Out $2,800.00 $11,200.00 3 2.50" Isolation Valve $600.00 $1,800.00 $1T4,900.0U Pumps 62 j Lateral Kits S800.00 $49,600.00 62 1.25" Pipe Laterals $0.00 $0.00 62 Pump/PaneFInstallation $1,500.00 $93,000.00 62 2010-93 82,927.00 $181,474.00 S324;0T4.0W Piping 150 1.25" Pipe $18.00 82.700.00 440 1.50" Pipe $18.50 88,140.00 940 2.00" Pipe 820.00 $18,800.00 540 2.50" Pipe $20.50 $11,070.00 4,350 3.00" Pipe $21.00 $91,350.00 ST32,060.00 Other 10 Contingencies - X57,103.40 $5T,T03.40 Total Per Home $9,210.23 Total Without Other »»»»»»»> $571,034.00 Grand Total Per Home $10,131.25 Total Including Other »»»»»»» $628,137.40 Note: The System Costs above are based on piping sized for, and Grinder Pumps manufactured by Environment One Corporation. Page 1 • • • UI RKII LY FAMILY LIMIILU 'ARINI H•JIII• GARFIELD COON IT, COLORADO LAKE SPRINGS, PUD E -ONE LOW PRESSURE SEWER DESIGN PHASES 1-2 HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC. W BLAKE AVENUE STE. 101 4 NOSINESS DANE EAST, BTE. 0138 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81001 ENOLEWOOD• CO 80112 P11.(970) 945-8878 P111303) 925-0564 FX(970) 945-2665 F0(003) 925-0547 1)1 ', IIJW Ult.UJW CK. DATE 2/20/02 1 Iti ONL -1.I'S • • • BERKELEY FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP CARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO LAKE SPRINGS, PUD E -ONE LOW PRESSURE SEWER DESIGN PHASES 3-5 HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC. 1517 BLAKE AVENUE, STE 101 14 INVERNESS DRIVE EAST, STE. D136 OLENVOOD SKIMS, CO 61601 ENGLEWOOD, CO 60112 P11(970) 946-6676 (14(303) 9260554 FX(970) 9452565 FX(303) 925-0647 DES. DJW NO. DATE REVISION DR. DJW CK, DATE 2/20/02 FILE-ONE-LPS • • • ESTIMATED TRAFFIC GENERATION LAKE SPRINGS P.U.D. Below are the calculations to determine the average daily traffic volume generated at each cross road intersection with County Road 114 after build out of the Lake Springs P.U.D. Primary Vehicles Ave. Daily Cross Road at C.R. 114 Residences Per Day * Traffic Vol. High Alpine Drive 38 10 380 High Alpine Circle 20 10 200 Van Cleve Lane 11 10 110 Lake Springs Drive 24 10 240 Lake Springs Court 9 10 90 Rivendell Road 23 10 230 Spring Valley Road 68 10 680 Lakeside Lane 5 10 50 Other 12 10 120 Total Average Daily Traffic Volume 2100 * Average Vehicle Trip Ends per Dwelling Unit - Single Family Detached Housing average rate = 9.57 on a weekday according to ITE Trip Generation Manual, 6th Edition Use 10 trips/day/residence Single -Family Detached Housing (210) • Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Dwelling Units On a: Weekday Number of Studies: 348 Avg. Number of Dwelling Units: 198 Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 9.57 4.31 - 21.85 3.69 Data Plot and Equation • T = Average Vehicle Trip Ends X Actual Data Points X = Number of Dwelling Units Fitted Curve 410 Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) = 0.920 Ln(X) + 2.707 Average Rate R2 = 0.96 NM Trip Generation, 6th Edition 263 Institute of Transportation Engineers • SPRING VALLEY SANITATION DISTRICT 2929 County Road 114 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 (970) 945-6399 August 10, 2000 Berkeley Family Limited Partnership Attn: Michael Berkeley, M.D. 3961 County Road 114 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Re: Wastewater Treatment Service for Berkeley Property Dear Dr. Berkeley: Spring Valley Sanitation District (the "District") is a special district organized under the laws of the State of Colorado, C.R.S. §32-1-101, et seq., as a quasi -municipal corporation for the purpose of providing sanitary sewer service to the areas within the District's boundaries. Although the property located in Garfield County and owned by the Berkeley Family Limited Partnership (the "Berkeley Property") is not currently included within the District's boundaries, • the Berkeley Property is subject to a Petition for Inclusion submitted to the District on March 9, 1999 and approved by the District. • The District has received site approval for an expanded, upgraded wastewater treatment facility from the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment ("CDPHE"), and the District intends to submit final plans and specifications for the new facility to CDPHE sometime during the month of August, 2000. The District anticipates the new wastewater treatment plant will be operational during the latter months of the year 2001. The District and Berkeley Family Limited Partnership executed a Pre -Inclusion and Wastewater Treatment Plant Development Agreement (the "Plant Development Agreement") on December 15, 2000, which identified the terms and conditions of the inclusion of the Berkeley Property within the District's boundaries and the Berkeley Family Limited Partnership's obligations to the District in order to secure wastewater treatment service for the Berkeley Property. Assuming the Berkeley Family Limited Partnership continues to comply with each of the terms and conditions of the Plant Development Agreement (with which the Partnership has complied to date), including the prepayment of construction costs for the Berkeley Property's pro rata share of wastewater treatment service from the District's upgraded facilities, the District is prepared to include the Berkeley Property in the District's boundaries and will provide sanitary sewer service to the Berkeley Property upon completion of construction and commencement of operations of the new District treatment plant. I: \2000\Letters-Memos \S V S D-Berkeley-Itr-2. wpd • Berkeley Family Limited Partnership Attn: Michael Berkeley, M.D. Page 2 August 10, 2000 • • If you have any questions or concerns regarding the District's ability to provide wastewater treatment service to the Berkeley Property, please contact me at your convenience. /gb cc: John R. Schenk, Esq. SVSD Board of Directors 1: \2000\ Letters- Memos \SVS D -Berkeley- Itr-2.wpd Sincerely, SPRING VALLEY SANITATION DISTRICT /L Greg Boecker Chairman • DRAINAGE REPORT • • I7/Gh �UNT%l' �NG/NEEiF/NG • • PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE STUDY FOR LAKE SPRINGS P.U.D. GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO HCE JOB NO. 2021003.54 April 2, 2002 Deric J. Walter, E.I. Project Engineer Nes (,.• ,1 Reviewed by: Leslie A. Hope, P.E. Project Manager 1517 Blake Avenue, Suite 101 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Telephone (970)435-8676 - Fax (970) 945-2555 8! • "VA L t ` 14 Inverness Drive East Suite D-136 Englewood, CO 80112 Telephone (303) 925-0544 - Fax (303) 925-0547 • TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION INTRODUCTION HYDROLOGY DRAINAGE PLAN BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES SUMMARY PAGE 1 1 1 2 3 FIGURES: 1) Vicinity Map (81/4" x 11") 2) SCS Soils Map (81/2" x 11") 3) Existing Conditions Basins (11"x17") 4) Developed Conditions Basins (1 1"x17") co_Q- Dicu 5) Grading and Drainage Plans (11"x 17") U APPENDIX: Calculations • • r INTRODUCTION • • Lake Springs P.U.D. is an approximately 441.6 acre site with Spring Valley Road and County Road 114 located within the center portion of the project. Please see the enclosed Vicinity Map for the site location. The offsite drainage affecting this property is Spring Valley. HYDROLOGY The hydrologic methods for this study are outlined in the United State Department of Agriculture (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) publication "Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds TR -55" and the computer program AutoCAD Hydrology SCS TR -55 Tabular Method. The existing vegetation consists of pasture/rangeland in fair condition. The developed conditions will have additional impervious and semi -pervious areas such as roofs, roads, and driveways and improved landscaping. The proposed development consists of 194 single-family lots with the minimum lot size being 1.0 acre and 4 residential cluster districts. Curve numbers have been provided in the Appendix. Peak on-site flows for this site will be primarily rainfall derived since the entire site is below 8.000 feet in elevation. Therefore, the storm drainage system should be more than adequate to handle on-site spring snowmelt runoff. DRAINAGE PLAN The on-site drainage will be, in general, captured by roadside ditches and conveyed by culverts and grass lined swales and directed off-site. The historic flow pattern is mostly sheet flow to the Spring Valley draw located in the center portion of the site. This draw is also where the existing sod farm is located. Natural drainage paths will be left intact. This ensures that, in general, overland flow will follow predictable historic paths. This also decreases the amount of grading necessary for roadways and actual building areas and thus reduces the possibility of erosion. Culverts will be utilized to convey stormwater under the proposed roadways. Before the stormwater is discharged to the Spring Valley drainage, the flows will be treated by either a settling pond and/or with grass -lined swales. Culverts have been sized for the minor storm event (25 year storm) where an acceptable overflow area is available. However, in some areas culverts must be part of the major drainage system and thus have been sized for the expected 100 -year flows. Culvert sizes and inverts are shown on the Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plan. Since all maximum head water depths are expected to be less than 1.5 times the pipe diameter, exit velocities will be reasonable, requiring only minor protective measures such as short sections of rip -rap. The culvert sizing and calculations are provided in the Appendix. Detention is proposed for the increase in peak stormwater runoff from the developed flows over the historic flows during the 100 -year storm. In the existing Basin A (see the Drainage Plan), the existing pond shall be enlarged to provide the necessary detention for • the site. Due to the proposed lots being in excess of 1.0 acre, the required detention is minimal. Detention calculations are provided in the Appendix. • • BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES The treatment practices used on Lake Springs P.U.D. consists of primarily source controlled facilities. With source control, the treatment of the stormwater is located near the source of the potential pollutants. Lake Springs P.U.D. is also practicing Best Management Practices (BMP) to minimize the potential pollution sources. One of the BMP's is the practice of minimizing directly connecting impervious areas (DCIA's). DCIA's concentrate runoff quickly, which results in larger peak runoff rates. DCIA's also do not encourage treatment of the stormwater. However, using grass -lined swales, instead of curb and gutter, helps reduce the pollutant loading being flushed downstream. It encourages filtration and percolation prior to being discharged to the receiving water. The Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual' recommends using the grass -lined swales as elongated detention basins containing the water quality capture volume. Grass -lined swales provide sufficient travel time so as to encourage the removal of suspended solids before runoff leaves the site.' The maintenance of the treatment facilities will be the responsibility of the Lake Springs P.U.D. Homeowners Association. During construction activities, the contractor will be responsible for keeping the treatment facilities working properly. cbwn;+reu.4n O'rr�S o s -�i The requirements of the contractor du ng construction are generally outlined on the grading plan (submitted separately). ncluded in these requirements is the installation of silt fences around the existing ponds and staking of erosion logs •n +ke c 1; -in the ditches. These structures should be checked and cleaned after storm events to reduce adverse impact to users of the creek downstream. The roadside ditches will need to be checked and serviced monthly during the spring, summer and fall and after major storm events to remove large debris and trash. All of the roadside ditches will need to be mowed when the height of the grass is over approximately 6 inches in length. One of the sources of sediment is from erosion around houses. Concrete pads are recommended at the downspout of roof drains. This will reduce one of the sources of excessive sediment. Also, cleaning of construction vehicles should not be done in close proximity to the infiltration facilities. Generally, these vehicles contain fine sediment that can clog the system. During the winter months, sand is applied to the roads for protection. This should only be used when necessary. The ditches will need to be cleaned in the spring to remove the deposits from the winter months. The proposed Lake Springs P.U.D. includes a variety of best management practices to mitigate potential water quality issues. The key elements to the effective functioning of 'Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual, Volume 3 - Best Management Practices. Denver. Colorado, September 1992. -2- • • • the water quality sruc$thures are roper and regular maintenance of the facilities. The maintenance will • got the Homeowners Association. By providing them with education on how the proposed facilities work and a maintenance schedule, the water quality system will be able to function efficiently. SUMMARY The preliminary drainage plan for Lake Springs P.U.D. consists of utilizing Best Management Practices to improve the water quality off the proposed impervious surfaces, and providing stormwater detention of the developed flows to only release the historic rate of stormwater flows. • Figures • • • •171 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY T7w•..F N 'RE&WOOD SPP/vcS t Mr _t$ '! J - - .~_~tel .3101" }tv '1/4\ 1/4 r.t -i2 4 1 • HIGH COUNTRY 1517 BLAKE AVENUE. SURE 101 GLENWOOD SPANOS. CO P -t(970) 945-8878 FX.(970) 945-2555 ENGINEERING, INC. 14 FNERNESS DFIVE EAST, SURE Dt36 81801 ENOLEWOOO, CO 80112 PH(303) 925-0554 FX(303) (303) 925-0547 B.F L.P. GARFIELD COUNTY. CO LAKE SPRINGS P.UD. V1CIN Y MAP SCALE: 1' =2000' DES. DJW CK: FILE NO TI.DWG SHEET DRDJW DATE: 4/5/02 2021003.54 • • 87 322\ 35 33 5,1 87 G1 106 8 35 :35 87 3: `� 35 87 35 95 IOh 34 35' 87 10 95/ 1( water v 35 L E 10 SOIL TYPE 34 EMPEDRADO LOAM (2-67. SLOPES. DEEP, WELL DRAINED, MODERATE PERMEABILITY: SOIL TYPE B) 35: EMPEDRADO LOAM (6-127. SLOPES, DEEP, WELL DRAINED, MODERATE PERMEABILITY: SOIL TYPE B) 43: FORELLE-BROWNSTO COMPLEX (6-12% SLOPES, DEEP, WELL DRAINED, MODERATE PERMEABILITY: SOIL TYPE B) 69: KILGORE SILT LOAM (ALLUVIAL FANS, SLOW RUNOFF, MODERATE PERMEABILITY: SOIL TYPE D) 87: MORVAL-TRIDELL COMPLEX (12-50% SLOPES, DEEP, WELL DRAINED, MOD. -MOD. RAPID PERM.: SOIL TYPE B) 94 SHOWALTER-MORAVAL COMPLEX (5-15% SLOPES, DEEP, WELL DRAINED, SLOW -MOD. PERM.: SOIL TYPE C) 5: SHOWALTER-MORAVAL COMPLEX (15-25% SLOPES, DEEP, WELL DRAINED, SLOW -MOD. PERM.: SOIL TYPE C) HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC. 1517 BLAKE AVBdUE. SUITE 101 GLENWOOD SPRINGS. CO 81601 PH.(970) 9.45-8878 FX(970) 945-2555 14 INVESFESS DF4VE EAST, SUITE D136 ENGLEEWOOD, CO 80112 PH.(303) 925-0554 FX(303) 925-0547 B.F.LP GARFIELD COLA -v, CO LAKE SPRINGS P.U.D. SCS SOLS I.AAP SCALE: 1' =2000' T1.DWG DES. D,;W CK: FILE NO. DR. D.,W DA -E: 4/5/02 2021003.54 SHEET -- b Y= =._.r-_ / ' I . si- ,. 1 II �' �I Q /, m / % �d 7 / ` M ---- _ . , ,--— ( L - } `... / _ - , - , — --- / ( \, ej:./ 7. ....., _ _ ...,— I .. - % /f r \`;, j. `-. \ i' v_ ^ �, � :..:--------N ` 2- i ill "Oq ) I l///,;x.11 `// / . .. J .......-i .., , \ / ,. J - � ••, ,, ...\ r--- j/ % -y '. \ , \ �S f 1‘. i I I .I 1 A , , ... I ( , / ' J / t'"~/'tt, [ . k �1 % // I / // _ � , v_ ; 0 ' . .,_„...t. „ .14( I �� ,-1 .,... ., . _:---...., ,,,_, ,_ ..., ) J • J , ---'•• -. 1,,,,,,:,:;_. \ . ) y ,;J, --, � ' __-_---- _ -- N.. . \ 11/ 1 I... 1 I ` .._..� ) \ .\\�\ \\., ) ...._ . `. �...i - \\� ••, "- .�.1 \\ �, �r '; / ../ , -" i O� A o BERKELEY FAMILY UMITEO PARTNERSHIP CARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO LAKE SPRINGS P.U.D. DEVELOPED CONDmONS DRAINAGE STUDY ---- 44C--,>, ^ HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING" INC. _ , �.ww.uvwwe. 16T7 SLAKE AVENUE. S)E 01 14 WYER E$8 ONVE EAST. STE. DO6 OLB1W000B WOS•CO OM ENOLEWOOD, CO!0111 _ Pr+.ro70) 945-0676 PH.003) 925-0554 - Fx0070) 046-2655 FX000) 023-0647 DOS. DJW NO, DATE I11 VISION /if -- __ 04. DJW ; .----' LKLAII . .—' ------- - - DATE 4/2/02 FILE: DRAIN • eh 8� 1 L 1 rorrr wrb': µme' 27/ • t. ky /2/.Y3I-;:j /:'' '.:.'.7 ."-. r---- '`, / ' ii P \\ -:--:-..'' \ BERKELEY FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO LAKE SPRINGS P.U.D. EXISTING CONDITIONS DRAINAGE STUDY ..CoPewv.or, HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC 4111.4aana, Avow - 151/ BLAKE AVENUE. WE 101 54 NVERNEBB COVE EABT. GTE 0136 PI -1(970) 946 8870 PIM303) 926-0554 FX(970) 945-2555 FM303) 925-0647 • DES. DJW DATE REVISION DR. UJW CH. LAII DA TE 4/2/02 FILE: DRAIN • • 1 u o1 fpbJ} 1`�f N ti A BERME Y IAMB .Y 1101110 PARTNL11:1 IIP GARPILID COUNTY, COLORADO LAKE SPRINGS, P.U.D. GRADING, DRAINAGE and EROSION CONIHOL PLAN C h. HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC. 1617 BLAKE AVEMIE, 8TE 101 14 NVEWE88 OWE EAST, 8TE 0136 OLB6WOOD SPRINGS, CO 81801 B✓ .4W000, CO 80112 Pl-l(8701046 8676 P11(303) 8260664 P1(0/0) 046 2688 (3031 025 064/ DP, IOW DR. DJW NO. DA II 111 VISI)* CK. 00 T1 4/1/07 1111 1:11 01 0( • • • 8 y 0 mN m --Is P m O 0 0 z 8 D 1 D r c r A z v m 0 z NORTH AF 0 / / / a'IVDS DIHdV?It BERKELEY FAMILY LIMITED PAR INLNS1111' GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO LAKE SPRINGS, P.U.D. GRADING, DRAINAGE and EROSION CONTROL PLAN / —1 . -4' /L„,r HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC. nrnr www, 16.7 BLAKE AVEMIE. 87E 10191 14E NIEMEN D CO6 112 BTE. DOS PH (07000D BPFMXJB, CO eleol ENOL 0) 925- O eD112 PH (070/ 5945 462066 Flt J00) 926-0667 _- �- - RX(D70) W6-2666 (WOW 926-0647 • 7,{(111; i DES. DJW NO. DATE REVISION DR. DJW CK OA 11 41102_ FILE: GO -01 • • • F. Q6) 11.111 [PI ?)41,0 90 04> rW ror !,04 00 V A2! zi •11 ;3 r .1 •0 40> 040 r11,' oS s 0 0 F-; 0 19 2. .34 > 40 r 40 ti) 2 MATCH TO SHEET 13 NORTH • • ‘ \ \ .„............'......,.,\,\`.„\ \ .•\ ,‘4 , \ ,,,\\), 11.:,,i'TLI• ", ! I, ' ,,',',.', ' ,,, ;/M(,,--. ,,,\• , V•1• i. .,:.— ‘is-': :::..,•,...„ . .,.;—;:. 2.- ••, .....- - • - .\. , \ , :lit/ i 7 \\\\\„ ii\ s\\\': \\ .\j') \ ' '''‘ \•• ‘‘‘‘ •' \\ ','IlYii1,17 N \\s , ''‘\\,‘ `,,,\ , \ \\\,)‘‘ \;1 2I, '' I, '''l,''C417('1/,II/•,11/1,'1/ ),'il/)"/,//,•1//2,,8,,•,/,;4 i,1//I,e,i/,,:/ fi , /-/,,,/.',,,-,. ,-,../,,--,' ,,,....„,: ,..•.::‘•—::.,.,...,_,,:,:,:.:\..:•".,:‘>'',,,„.:,',,,,‘,,,.,'1•;:,1-„•,.,'„,:•. / • • -4— • ” 1 _)--;•••• // ' -"/7/2••• — .... I \ (//' r•'1 •\ • ' • • " // /f/ 1/ S _ gg. Yr, s 8 Li A , • (, / 4 r. • / 11, \ , ; [ ‘, ( \ •••,„;.‹,„ • , ; • • , \ I ' \ ; • \ • ‘” ) \ \ \s' • , • „ " ,,/• \\ \ ' • „/ (5 2 / ; • 7.1 / •/ , !. )•, • I /), 4211 V • /, • ,/. L9/ 6 / 7[1)1 77( /l ) J , 4' I I . ..• ! I ( / 1 /I/ / 1 ( C ( II 1 'I . ' '(,,' !,'• 7•'••-• - - / J .1 y \ 1Y i i s'':::;';: / 1ll 11 \ \ / i ) I . I • •"" • i 1 . 0. \ i )) . '' ' )\\''M'' 0‘.' :'°'--: ----. ' \ 1 I 1 \ o‘,.'' / j 1 ' ,,,, , ' , • ...".I, , ) ' 1\ 4\‘, Ns .,,\,,. - . . /1 I ll \ 1 • . '''''''' / : 11; ., \\ • ' \ \ II \I \ \ , / ,,, , 1\ \ \ k, ,,, \ ,/ // , , i:: ',.._, 00 ;\/1 (,, i \if (I, \:, \\,‘,„\,,,.\.,.,,,.,„,,,I,\.\ ‘,I ,(,,,i' t,i,' (, a t-i'l:, ..,.. \ 1 I r: '',. I \ , ' \ \\V„ ‘‘'',‘,‘ k:,:., ... •, i ) ) , \ \ \ \ 'N,A.•• '',' ''',.,„ • ". \4 ,4,,4 4- r , •I i \ 'I • ,. '‘' '4 \\ // ill, II IOC) \i); r- ,4 -70 — _ 1-111111-----"::::71-a."71--- — --,-.-„,-..-a--- ameassawitssimii -..,--:'•,-;:-... -....--'----- ....1.- , 1111111"-':: -0;e14,1t2•2 --_„, 1 ,ir,,, i'Li.:. •. . :..;:.:-1.;,..•'L7,..": Li .‘"SZ:1' I'Ii'll' \'' ''Y,.„ I. -1:'-• -.-:''''' ..:.-- -C-4c°'?;'F'`'''' -' l----'-. ' ' ' ---- ITir;)=• -77:•-- ' '' ),: \ . \ ,',' • . . , '''' )5'.'g i':-....._.'''" -:'•:• --•-•': L.— '''' • 1 ' - . i) / 4, , ) 1 ,/ / \".. .._.,•., - \ II \I 1[ ,•\ i 1 i :\ ;' \\,-• \ -•N •• '1677 ".• ."4"- \ \\.\: \ • 11 \ \ \\ \\ • , \ \ ) \ \ °‘• \ ,(0\\•\ • •00 ''' "0 '''"% • , \\ , • •\\ \ \' •\\\ 00 •• \ • I : I • \ / / \ \ \ \ / 11 : ') I 'II / , , • I A ).),) ,' „•• /, / ) (() • ) 7' • • \// \‘ \\‘' , . '• " . •. , ,„.21'00•0 000 , •Ns • " - • 0 • );_ ) c)I 714 I 1,)t \ • 8 g, 11111K1)[Y I AMU( IMI ILI) PAN INI CASHEW COON EY, COLORADO LAKE SPRINGS, P.U.D. GRADiNG, DRAINAGE end EROSION CONTROL PLAN HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC. 14 W68€8$ CANE EAST, STE 17130t517 BLAKE AVENJE, 8TE DI GLENWOOD SPI*4Cia CO 41001 ENGLEWOOD, CO 8092 PI -t(970) 945-9575 P1{(303) 925-0554 FIX 070) 945-2665 FX(303) 925-0647 L)15 NO DAIL DR. DJW CK. DATE 4/8/02 FILE. G44-01 11 VISION Li 1 • • 1 MATCH TO SHEET 13 „// / / '..' ( /'" \ i 0.. 7 H a 1. INSTALL EROSION LOG AT ALL CULVERT INLETS PER DETAILS ON SHEET #40. 2. INSTALL RIP -RAP AT ALL 18"0. 24"0 AND 30"0 CULVERT OUTLETS PER DETAIL ON SHEET #40. 1� 1 ., '1 1 / 1, '14 , \\ / ILII • \.. a BERKELEY FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP GARFIELD COUNTY. COLORADO LAKE SPRINGS, P.U.D. GRADING, DRAINAGE and EROSION CONTROL PLAN .r z HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC. 1617 BLAKE AVENUE. STE 101 14 NVEANEBB DANE EAST, STE. DM O ±NWOOD OPHNOB. 00 01001 H14.EW000, CO 4062 PH(970) 946-0074 P11.(900) 926-0664 FX(970) 946-2666 FX.(.903) 925-0647 DES. DJW NO. DATE DR. DJW CK. DALE ---4/5/02 FILE: GR -01 REVISION 8Y • • 1 Q U A U N om -.'g xo vm2 gj, Y- m.x>—u?=- ODImno Irm-Z AxAnZ ry r m-n� OA� r !y On'O yr -r- zoO OwOZ0CRA� vA m 859 AA mDppf,pAF I C z r--.i • Appendix • • Project L0,1C0 Job No. .�-JI 1Oi 5`L- By Xi.�r Date 5/11 tot Date Subject Ck'd by Page e) in A Area-- co/RV-118- +Z= 144.32 ac T m.e._ O Cor?Cej iCr, Lend = j�Od 33Cp'. 15 Sh: iIMO OonC. - Im&.) t\IL! rr'�rel (2 724 12511 (›.(a 2(0Q 18 rn_crtu-H, slope 1c\(0- too _ o. o81 33cort,ct ve_S) - D a Fed D.r; di o r,. 25 Q y£clr-• : Y tJOAA A1ot5 CLoo l Deve1 VW% Pro 198(a.21I -2 - SIS•. � �i.me..rn- °,.,ar .e. a :i cciiarr L er►�k _ 27150' 5'ne 10W ` t --113C' 300 0, d Cor.? 2 3,1,,.. Acta} la,,0 c occ, ?Icy() 11.30'— Cdcif 012 -Li So' = O. 690 CA_Lr-ve Nurr hey' 4- -{-a ton i6 Satre 25 C\.0 Frorn C c T� Qz = 13.1cis Q, - �t,3 ccs 923 Cooper Avenue • Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Toio.,t,n.,o• rowrn QaS_M7; • PAY' lQ7n\ Qac -2 ,U- rvGwerAtI,G Project L_< :;'t:c.\ r < Job No. 2D:: D ' :), _ By .-.5i),A,:-. :-i" : Ck'd by Date Subject r a.i r of Page of 52.E2 r me or Cori `eirN•c,„ n ` Ler: , =2910 5h2 e -claw S(pe - -115-7•- 1I'42I 3OO 0,� TT' 'r, ti; Corgi, clow -1142 - GCS o bulcu Viz= = I , 0_-05 Vie_ as . a:,in :A.J. d. c4pk lie-% ;r, 5 r �r.�::— ',',te Sbre-}i:14%/„O'J'= C9,J •,. - it -7 - 254,. , Cr, '-i Sha1 cgnc ,;10‘.0 si epe = 1 041 - (0(1 t-2 1 eis)C): -'. . 1 0411" ;'-..';.i ik---T.= S ,..in, rve_ Nu:mhef 4 eC,t',p -icr on LunrZaS s‘. Q104.= 1O1°1._CS Use Of 18" ADS--NIz !-1vi(o- 1.05 NW = 923 Cooper Avenue • Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Telephone: (970) 945-8676 • Fax: (970) 945-2555 • EX100.txt TR -55 Tabular Hydrograph method Input Summary Description LAKE SPRINGS PUD - EXISTING CONDITIONS - 100 YEAR (ENTIRE SITE) Rainfall Distribution Type II Ia/P Interpolation On Total Area 441.620 ac Peak Time 780.00 min Peak Flow 132.24 cfs Given Input Data: Subarea D/S Subareas Description Area (ac) CN Tc Tt Rainfall (min) (min) (in) PROJECT 441.620 74 70.37 0.00 2.6000 Support Data: Messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 60.00 min in row <1>. Info: Time of Travel rounded to 6.00 min in row <1>. • • Page 1 • • • Ex25.txt TR -55 Tabular Hydrograph .Method Input Summary Description LAKE SPRINGS PUD - EXISTING CONDITIONS - 25 YEAR (ENTIRE SITE) Rainfall Distribution Type II Ia/P Interpolation On Total Area 441.620 ac Peak Time 780.00 min Peak Flow 81.79 cfs Given Input Data: subarea D/s Subareas Description Area (ac) CN Tc Tt Rainfall (min) (min) (in) PROJECT 441.620 74 70.37 0.00 2.2000 Support Data: Messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 60.00 min in row <1>. Info: Time of Travel rounded to 6.00 min in row <1>. Page 1 • • e OFFSITE.txt TR -55 Tabular Hydrograph Method Input Summary Description LAKE SPRINGS PUD - 100 YEAR STORM Rainfall Distribution Type II Ia/P Interpolation On Total Area 967.089 ac Peak Time 816.00 min Peak Flow 189.42 cfs Given Input Data: subarea D/S Subareas Area Description (ac) CN Tc Tt Rainfall (min) (min) (in) OFFSITE BASIN 967.089 74 113.06 0.00 2.6000 Support Data: Subarea Name: OFFSITE BASIN, Row: 1 Computed Sheet flow time > 38.53 min Messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 120.00 min in row <1>. Computed Shallow flow time > 74.53 min Messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 120.00 min in row <1>. Total Time of Concentration > 113.06 min Messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 120.00 min in row <1>. Curve Number is based on Type B/C Soils, Grasslands in Fair Condition Page 1 • • OFFSITE25.txt TR -55 Tabular Hydrograph Method Input Summary Description LAKE SPRINGS PUD - 25 YEAR STORM Rainfall Distribution Type II Ia/P Interpolation On Total Area 967.089 ac Peak Time 816.00 min Peak Flow 119.76 cfs Given Input Data: Subarea D/S subareas Description Area (ac) CN Tc Tt Rainfall (min) (min) (in) OFFSITE BASIN 967.089 74 113.06 0.00 2.2000 Support Data: Subarea Name: OFFSITE BASIN, Row: 1 Computed Sheet flow time > 38.53 min Messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 120.00 min in row <1>. Computed Shallow flow time > 74.53 min Messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 120.00 min in row <1>. Total Time of concentration > 113.06 min Messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 120.00 min in row <1>. Curve Number is based on Type B/C soils, grasslands in fair condition Page 1 • • • OFFSITEtoCl.txt Sheet Flow Description Manning's n 0.1500 Flow Length 300.00 ft Two Yr, 24 hr Rainfall 1.2000 in Land Slope 0.02 ft/ft Computed Sheet flow time > 38.53 min Shallow Concentrated Flow Description Surface unpaved Flow Length 10455.00 ft Watercourse Slope 0.02 ft/ft Velocity 2.34 fps Computed shallow flow time > 74.53 min Page 1 • • PR100.txt TR -55 Tabular Hydrograph method Input Summary Description LAKE SPRINGS PUD - PROPOSED CONDITIONS - 100 YEAR (ENTIRE SITE) Rainfall Distribution Type II Ia/P Interpolation On Total Area 441.620 ac Peak Time 780.00 min Peak Flow 139.27 cfs Given Input Data: Subarea D/5 Subareas Description Area (ac) CN Tc Tt Rainfall (min) (min) (in) PROJECT Support Data: Subarea Name: PROJECT, Row: 1 441.620 75 70.37 0.00 2.6000 Computed Sheet flow time > 19.70 min Messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 60.00 min in row <1>. Info: Time of Travel rounded to 6.00 min in row <1>. Computed Shallow flow time > 50.67 min Messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 60.00 min in row <1>. Info: Time of Travel rounded to 6.00 min in row <1>. Total Time of Concentration > 70.37 min Messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 60.00 min in row <1>. Info: Time of Travel rounded to 6.00 min in row <1>. Page 1 • PR25.txt TR -55 Tabular Hydrograph Method Input Summary Description LAKE SPRINGS PUD - PROPOSED CONDITIONS - 25 YEAR (ENTIRE SITE) Rainfall Distribution Type II Ia/P Interpolation On Total Area 441.620 ac Peak Time 780.00 min Peak Flow 88.51 cfs Given Input Data: Subarea D/S Subareas Area CN Tc Tt Rainfall Description (ac) (min) (min) (in) PROJECT Support Data: Subarea Name: PROJECT, Row: 1 441.620 75 70.37 0.00 2.2000 Computed sheet flow time > 19.70 mi Messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 60.00 min in row <1>. Info: Time of Travel rounded to 6.00 min in row <1>. Computed shallow flow time > 50.67 min "'Messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 60.00 min in row <1>. Info: Time of Travel rounded to 6.00 min in row <1>. • Total Time of Concentration > 70.37 Tin Messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 60.00 min in row <1>. Info: Time of Travel rounded to 6.00 min in row <1>. Page 1 III Sheet Flow • • prTC.txt Description PROPOSED SITE - SHEET FLOW TC Manning's n 0.1500 Flow Length 300.00 ft Two Yr, 24 hr Rainfall 1.2000 in Land Slope 0.11 ft/ft Computed sheet flow time > 19.70 min shallow Concentrated Flow Description PROPOSED SITE - SHALLOW FLOW TC surface Unpaved Flow Length 8775.00 ft watercourse Slope 0.03 ft/ft velocity 2.89 fps Computed Shallow flow time > 50.67 min Page 1 • • • DETENT.txt LAKE SPRINGS PUD - HCE#2011010.52 Basin Output Pond Name Distribution Type Type II Frequency Type 100 years Area 441.620 ac Peak Inflow 139.27 cfs Peak Outflow 132.24 cfs Runoff 0.69 in Runoff volume 1112975.55 ft3 Storage volume 127423.60 ft3 Maximum Storage Elevation 0.00 ft Page 1 • PR100A.txt TR -55 Tabular Hydrograph ,Method Input Summary Description LAKE SPRINGS PUD - PROPOSED CONDITIONS - 100 YEAR - BASIN A Rainfall Distribution Type II Ia/P Interpolation On Total Area 144.320 ac Peak Time 750.00 min Peak Flow 67.38 cfs Given Input Data: Subarea D/S Subareas Description Area (ac) CN Tc Tt Rainfall (min) (min) (in) BASIN A Support Data: Subarea Name: BASIN A, Row: 1 144.320 74 30.30 0.00 2.6000 Computed Sheet flow time > 18.40 min Messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 30.00 min in row <1>. Computed shallow flow time > 11.90 min Messages: • Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 30.00 min in row <1>. Total Time of Concentration > 30.30 min Messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 30.00 min in row <1>. • Page 1 r • • PR25A.txt TR -55 Tabular Hydrograph Method Input Summary Description LAKE SPRINGS PUD - PROPOSED CONDITIONS - 25 YEAR - BASIN A Rainfall Distribution Type II Ia/P Interpolation On Total Area 144.320 ac Peak Time 750.00 min Peak Flow 42.12 cfs Given Input Data: Subarea D/S Subareas Description Area (ac) CN Tc Tt Rainfall (min) (min) (in) BASIN A Support Data: Subarea Name: BASIN A, Row: 1 144.320 74 30.30 0.00 2.2000 Computed Sheet flow time > 18.40 min Messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 30.00 min in row <1>. Computed Shallow flow time > 11.90 min Messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 30.00 min in row <1>. Total Time of Concentration > 30.30 min Messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 30.00 min in row <1>. Page 1 • • • PR100B.txt TR -55 Tabular Hydrograph Method Input Summary Description LAKE SPRINGS PUD - PROPOSED CONDITIONS - 100 YEAR - BASIN B Rainfall Distribution Type II Ia/P Interpolation On Total Area 45.597 ac Peak Time 750.00 min Peak Flow 21.29 cfs Given Input Data: Subarea D/S Subareas Area CN Tc Tt Rainfall Description (ac) (min) (min) (in) BASIN B 45.597 74 32.34 0.00 2.6000 Support Data: Messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 30.00 min in row <1>. Page 1 • PR25B.txt TR -55 Tabular Hydrograph Method Input Summary Description LAKE SPRINGS PUD - PROPOSED CONDITIONS - 25 YEAR - BASIN B Rainfall Distribution Type II Ia/P Interpolation On Total Area 45.597 ac Peak Time 750.00 min Peak Flow 13.31 cfs Given Input Data: Subarea D/S Subareas Area CN Tc Tt Rainfall Description (ac) (min) (min) (in) BASIN B 45.597 74 32.34 0.00 2.2000 Support Data: Messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 30.00 min in row <1>. • • Page 1 • PR100C.txt TR -55 Tabular Hydrograph method Input Summary Description LAKE SPRINGS PUD - PROPOSED CONDITIONS - 100 YEAR - BASIN C Rainfall Distribution Type II Ia/P Interpolation On Total Area 52.123 ac Peak Time 756.00 min Peak Flow 22.68 cfs Given Input Data: Subarea D/S subareas Area Description (ac) • CN Tc Tt Rainfall (min) (min) (in) BASIN C Support Data: Subarea Name: BASIN C, Row: 52.123 74 36.06 0.00 2.6000 Computed Sheet flow time > 26.71 min messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 30.00 min in row <1>. Info: Tinie of Travel rc.:nded to 6.00 min in row <1>. Computed Shallow flow _ime > 9.35 min messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 30.00 min in row <1>. Info: Time of Travel rounded to 6.00 min in row <1>. Total Time of Concentration > 36.06 min messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 30.00 min in row <1>. Info: Time of Travel rounded to 6.00 min in row <1>. Page 1 PR25C.txt TR -55 Tabular Hydrograph method Input Summary Description LAKE SPRINGS PUD - PROPOSED CONDITIONS - 25 YEAR - BASIN C Rainfall Distribution Type II Ia/P Interpolation On Total Area 52.123 ac Peak Time 756.00 min Peak Flow 14.36 cfs Given Input Data: Subarea D/S Subareas Description Area (ac) CN Tc Tt Rainfall (min) (min) (in) BASIN C Support Data: Subarea Name: BASIN C, Row: 1 52.123 74 36.06 0.00 2.2000 Computed sheet flow time > 26.71 min messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 30.00 min in row <1>. Info: Time of Travel rounded to 6.00 min in row <1> Computed Shallow flow time > 9.35 min •messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 30.00 min in row <1>. Info: Time of Travel rounded to 6.00 min in row <1>. • Total Time of Concentration > 36.06 min messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 30.00 min in row <1>. Info: Time of Travel rounded to 6.00 min in row <1>. Page 1 • PR100D.txt TR -55 Tabular Hydrograph Method Input Summary Description LAKE SPRINGS PUD - PROPOSED CONDITIONS - 100 YEAR - 3ASIN D Rainfall Distribution Type II Ia/P Interpolation On Total Area 23.318 ac Peak Time 750.00 min Peak Flow 10.89 cfs Given Input Data: Subarea D/S Subareas Area CN Tc Tt Rainfall Description (ac) (min) (min) (in) BASIN D Support Data: Subarea Name: BASIN D, Row: 1 23.318 74 29.83 0.00 2.6000 Computed Sheet flow time > 24.83 min Messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 30.00 min ;n roe•, <1>. Computed Shallow flow time > 5.00 min Messages: • Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 30.00 min in row <1>. • Total Time of Concentration > 29.83 min Messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 30.00 min in row <1>. Page 1 • • • PR25D.txt TR -55 Tabular Hydrograph Method Input Summary Description LAKE SPRINGS PUD - PROPOSED CONDITIONS - 25 YEAR - BASIN D Rainfall Distribution Type II Ia/P Interpolation On Total Area 23.32 ac Peak Time 12.50 hrs Peak Flow 6.81 cfs Given Input Data: Subarea D/S Subareas Area CN Tc Tt Rainfall Description (ac) (hrs) (hrs) (in) BASIN D Support Data: Subarea Name: BASIN D, Row: 1 23.32 74 0.50 0.00 2.20 Computed Sheet flow time > 0.41 hrs Messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 0.50 hrs in row <1>. Computed Shallow flow time > 0.08 hrs Messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 0.50 hrs in row <1>. Total Time of Concentration > 0.50 hrs Messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 0.50 hrs in row <1>. Page 1 LAKE SPRINGS, PUD Job No. 2021003.54 Drainage Study Data For Culverts April 2, 2002 k:\wp\gprodata\file\202\1003\drainage.xls Existing Conditions: Pasture, grassland, or range: CN=68 {B},74{B/C},79{C} {same} Developed Conditions: 1.0 acre Residential: CN=68 {B},74{B/C},79{C} Culvert Dia. 25 -yr (in.) V N CO - N V N V N O co N V N c0 - V N V' N V N 30 I CO CO CO 00 CO Q Z 0 M 'Cr N C N Culvert Q100 (cfs) 0 O Q) rr V 21.29 36.26 - V •r- co V rcO co 8.97 co 0 NCV 5.00 co LO N NT- M CD C M 8.24 O (O N O 00) .M- 20.25 Culvert Q25 (cfs) O O co (.,i 32.36 CO V V (f) N 0 M6 M 5.12 .,-(D O 6.21 I 18.12 LO nj 0M (O h. 5.78 4.24 (D c (D c0 10.20 Basin Q100 (cfs) f` (O OO u.j 42.45 21.29 f\ V 10.85 7.39 O O O 0.93 Q1 00 18.96 5.00 t1') N N M 3.40 N c0 6.04 M 0) CO co 0) COO to N N Basin Q25 (cfs) Cr O O N 29.74 o-) Vi 10.49 7.60 N 6 5.07 0.48 N CD (o N,.-: CO CO N- •.-a 5.78 N CO 0) (0 CO ON 6 U �: F .......-C O4 N O N O 0) 4 O O O O •- O - N O O O 0) O N O CV O .- O 0 O 1- O X) O r- O 0 N O r N O 0) O 0 LL 00 _ co L N 0 0- o fn (D (0 0 O 40 V O O CO on O O 00 co O V N. O O 'Cr 0) O O 0) (O O O 0) r- O O CO to co O (0 4 co O CO 00 co O CO (f) O O 0 O O 0) O O 0 0) O O (l) co O O CO V O 0) co O M 00 co O 00 co O N O 0 O O f` O O CO O (O (O 0 0 m 0 CV O WO M O� 1-- N O (I) (0 O O to O CO (n O 0 (D O V N- O N 0) 0 N o Low Elev 7082 CO (n r 7028 N CO CO 0) 0n 7034 V (0 0h CO ti co N (C) co 7108 6948 6934 6930 6936 6940 7082 J 0 (o (D 6950 6932 N N (0 High Elev 7300 CV CO N h- 7144 0 CO N � 7146 CO 0) 0 N. 7164 7142 n 0) (D 7156 .- r' 6972 co 0) co 0) 0) co 0) 0) co 0 ,-- n 7082 0 ,- N. 7156 7080 Sheet Flow a. O (n o N O a 0 O 0 N O o_ O o O m O O 0v 0 O co0 O 0m O O 4 O O o_ O o O co 0 O 0 O o 0 O Tr 0 O coN O 4 0 O 4 0 O o_ O Dist. O LO 50 0 60 (O 50 50 0 60 50 1 50 50 50 50 O 60 co 60 50 O 60 (O 50 50 50 Low Elev 7300 7232 V V r. 7230 CD R N. (0 0) 0 n 7164 N V n V r` 0) CO CO (f) N- V 'Cr � N n 0) (0 0 CO 0) CO V 0) 0) (0 V 0) 0) CO 0 (11 r� 7082 CO 0 h- 7156 7080 High Elev o CO n 7234 7154 CO (V n LO r- 7100 CO n 7150 6978 CO r- 7149 6978 6984 7000 0) 0) CO M r-- 7088 1 7108 7158 7085 Z (i V n 0o co 0) N- 0) r` 0) r` a) N- 0) r 0o (D co (D a) n V r. col CO 0o (0 0) CO co (0 0) 0- a) N- 0) n V h- co CO o a. rn F m m 0 0 0 0 U m m U v m m m m m 0 0 0 m m Z(0 ` V U Q CO (D N a) a) O M (o 0) O_ 0) r� O r-- • O (f) N r- .- (o c0 (D U') N - . m co .7 0) (o N • (O 0 CD• - V N r` N6 N 4') (o Culvert Basin Sub -Basin Al Sub -Basin A2 Sub -Basin A3 Sub -Basin A4 Sub -Basin A5 1 Sub -Basin A6 Sub -Basin A7 Sub -Basin A8 Sub -Basin A9 1 Sub -Basin 131 Sub -Basin B2 Sub -Basin C1 I Sub -Basin C2 Sub -Basin C3 Sub -Basin C4 Sub -Basin D1 Sub -Basin D2 Sub -Basin D3 Sub -Basin El Sub -Basin F1 • • • A1-Q25.txt TR -55 Tabular Hydrograph Method Input Summary Description Lake Springs PUD: Proposed Conditions: 25 -yr: Culvert Al Rainfall Distribution Type II Ia/P Interpolation On Total Area 26.4 ac Peak Time 12.30 hrs Peak Flow 10.10 cfs Given Input Data: Subarea D/S Subareas Area CN Tc Tt Rainfall Description (ac) (hrs) (hrs) (in) Culvert Al 26.4 74 0.28 0.00 2.20 Support Data: Messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 0.30 hrs in row <1>. Page 1 • • A1-Q100.txt TR -55 Tabular Hydrograph Method Input Summary Description Lake Springs PUD: Proposed Conditions: 100 -yr: Culvert Al Rainfall Distribution Type II Ia/P Interpolation On Total Area 26.4 ac Peak Time 12.30 hrs Peak Flow 16.17 cfs Given Input Data: Subarea D/S subareas Area CN Tc Tt Rainfall Description (ac) (hrs) (hrs) (in) Culvert Al 26.4 74 0.28 0.00 2.60 Support Data: Messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 0.30 hrs in row <1>. Page 1 • • • A2-Q25.txt TR -55 Tabular Hydrograph Method Input Summary Description Lake Springs PUD: Proposed Conditions: 25 -yr: Culvert A2 Rainfall Distribution Type II Ia/P Interpolation On Total Area 12.9 ac Peak Time 12.20 hrs Peak Flow 2.62 cfs Given Input Data: Subarea D/S Subareas Area CN Tc Tt Rainfall Description (ac) (hrs) (hrs) (in) Culvert A2 12.9 68 0.24 0.00 2.20 Support Data: Messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 0.20 hrs in row <1>. Page 1 • • • A2-Q100.txt TR -55 Tabular Hydrograph Method Input Summary Description Lake Springs PUD: Proposed Conditions: 100 -yr: Culvert A2 Rainfall Distribution Type II Ia/P Interpolation On Total Area 12.9 ac Peak Time 12.20 hrs Peak Flow 5.19 cfs Given Input Data: subarea D/S Subareas Description Area (ac) CN Tc Tt Rainfall (hrs) (hrs) (in) Culvert A2 12.9 68 0.24 0.00 2.60 Support Data: Messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 0.20 hrs in row <1>. Page 1 A3-Q25.txt • TR -55 Tabular Hydrograph Method Input Summary Description Lake Springs PUD: Proposed Conditions: 25 -yr: Culvert A3 Rainfall Distribution Type II Ia/P Interpolation On Total Area 30.9 ac • • Peak Time 12.10 hrs Peak Flow 29.74 cfs Given Input Data: Subarea D/S Subareas Area CN Tc Tt Rainfall Description (ac) (hrs) (hrs) (in) Culvert A3 30.9 79 0.14 0.00 2.20 Support Data: Messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 0.10 hrs in row <1>. Page 1 A • • A3-Q100.txt TR -55 Tabular Hydrograph Method Input Summary Description Lake Springs PUD: Proposed Conditions: 100 -yr: Culvert A3 Rainfall Distribution Type 11 Ia/P Interpolation On Total Area 30.9 ac Peak Time 12.10 hrs Peak Flow 42.45 cfs Given Input Data: Subarea D/S Subareas Area CN Tc Tt Rainfall Description (ac) (hrs) (hrs) (in) Culvert A3 30.9 79 0.14 0.00 2.60 Support Data: Messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 0.10 hrs in row <1>. Page 1 • • • A4-Q25.txt TR -55 Tabular Hydrograph Method Input Summary Description Lake Springs PUD: Proposed Conditions: 25 -yr: Culvert A4 Rainfall Distribution Type II Ia/P Interpolation On Total Area 15.5 ac Peak Time 12.10 hrs Peak Flow 14.92 cfs Given Input Data: Subarea D/S Subareas Area CN Tc Tt Rainfall Description (ac) (hrs) (hrs) (in) Culvert A4 15.5 79 0.11 0.00 2.20 Support Data: Messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 0.10 hrs in row <1>. Page 1 • • A4-Q100.txt TR -55 Tabular Hydrograph Method Input Summary Description Lake Springs PUD: Proposed Conditions: 100 -yr: Culvert A4 Rainfall Distribution Type II Ia/P Interpolation On Total Area 15.5 ac Peak Time 12.10 hrs Peak Flow 21.29 cfs Given Input Data: Subarea D/S Subareas Area CN Tc Tt Rainfall Description (ac) (hrs) (hrs) (in) Culvert A4 15.5 79 0.11 0.00 2.60 Support Data: Messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 0.10 hrs in row <1>. Page 1 • • • A5-Q25.txt TR -55 Tabular Hydrograph Method Input Summary Description Lake Springs PUD: Proposed Conditions: 25 -yr: Culvert A5 Rainfall Distribution Type 11 Ia/P Interpolation On Total Area 10.9 ac Peak Time 12.10 hrs Peak Flow 10.49 cfs Given Input Data: Subarea D/S Subareas Area CN Tc Tt Rainfall Description (ac) (hrs) (hrs) (in) Culvert A5 10.9 79 0.10 0.00 2.20 Support Data: Page 1 A5-Q100.txt TR -55 Tabular Hydrograph Method Input Summary Description Lake Springs PUD: Proposed Conditions: 100 -yr: Culvert A5 Rainfall Distribution Type 11 Ia/P Interpolation On Total Area 10.9 ac Peak Time 12.10 hrs Peak Flow 14.97 cfs Given Input Data: Subarea D/S Subareas Area CN Tc Tt Rainfall Description (ac) (hrs) (hrs) (in) Culvert A5 10.9 79 0.10 0.00 2.60 Support Data: • • Page 1 • s 1 A6-Q25.txt TR -55 Tabular Hydrograph Method Input Summary Description Lake springs PUD: Proposed Conditions: 25 -yr: Culvert A6 Rainfall Distribution Type II Ia/P Interpolation On Total Area 7.9 ac Peak Time 12.10 hrs Peak Flow 7.60 cfs Given Input Data: Subarea D/S Subareas Area CN Tc Tt Rainfall Description (ac) (hrs) (hrs) (in) Culvert A6 7.9 79 0.11 0.00 2.20 Support Data: Messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 0.10 hrs in row <1>. Page 1 • • A6-Q100.txt TR -55 Tabular Hydrograph Method Input Summary Description Lake Springs PUD: Proposed Conditions: 100 -yr: Culvert A6 Rainfall Distribution Type II Ia/P Interpolation On Total Area 7.9 ac Peak Time 12.10 hrs Peak Flow 10.85 cfs Given Input Data: Subarea D/S Subareas Area CN Tc Tt Rainfall Description (ac) (hrs) (hrs) (in) Culvert A6 7.9 79 0.11 0.00 2.60 Support Data: Messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 0.10 hrs in row <1>. Page 1 • • • A7-Q25.txt TR -55 Tabular Hydrograph Method Input Summary Description Lake springs PUD: Proposed Conditions: 25 -yr: Culvert A7 Rainfall Distribution Type II Ia/P Interpolation On Total Area 7.0 ac Peak Time 12.20 hrs Peak Flow 5.12 cfs Given Input Data: Subarea D/S Subareas Area CN Tc Tt Rainfall Description (ac) (hrs) (hrs) (in) Culvert A7 7.0 79 0.21 0.00 2.20 Support Data: Messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 0.20 hrs in row <1>. Page 1 A7-Q100.txt • TR -55 Tabular Hydrograph Method • • Input Summary Description Lake Springs PUD: Proposed Conditions: 100 -yr: culvert A7 Rainfall Distribution Type II Ia/P Interpolation On Total Area 7.0 ac Peak Time 12.20 hrs Peak Flow 7.39 cfs Given Input Data: Subarea D/S Subareas Area CN Tc Tt Rainfall Description (ac) (hrs) (hrs) (in) Culvert A7 7.0 79 0.21 0.00 2.60 Support Data: Messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 0.20 hrs in row <1>. Page 1 • • • A8-Q25.txt TR -55 Tabular Hydrograph Method Input Summary Description Lake Springs PUD: Proposed Conditions: 25 -yr: culvert A8 Rainfall Distribution Type 11 Ia/P Interpolation On Total Area 25.0 ac Peak Time 12.20 hrs Peak Flow 5.07 cfs Given Input Data: Subarea D/S subareas Area Description (ac) CN Tc Tt Rainfall (hrs) (hrs) (in) Culvert A8 25.0 68 0.19 0.00 2.20 Support Data: Messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 0.20 hrs in row <1>. Page 1 • • • A8-Q100.txt TR -55 Tabular Hydrograph Method Input Summary Description Lake Springs PUD: Proposed Conditions: 100 -yr: Culvert A8 Rainfall Distribution Type II Ia/P Interpolation On Total Area 25.0 ac Peak Time 12.20 hrs Peak Flow 10.06 cfs Given Input Data: Subarea D/S Subareas Area CN Tc Tt Rainfall Description (ac) (hrs) (hrs) (in) Culvert A8 25.0 68 0.19 0.00 2.60 Support Data: Messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 0.20 hrs in row <1>. Page 1 • • • A9-Q25.txt TR -55 Tabular Hydrograph Method Input Summary Description Lake Springs PUD: Proposed Conditions: 25 -yr: Culvert A9 Rainfall Distribution Type II Ia/P Interpolation On Total Area 1.7 ac Peak Time 12.10 hrs Peak Flow 0.48 cfs Given Input Data: Subarea D/S Subareas Area CN Tc Tt Rainfall Description (ac) (hrs) (hrs) (in) Culvert A9 1.7 68 0.11 0.00 2.20 Support Data: Messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 0.10 hrs in row <1>. Page 1 A9-Q100.txt • TR -55 Tabular Hydrograph Method • • Input Summary Description Lake Springs PUD: Proposed Conditions: 100 -yr: Culvert A9 Rainfall Distribution Type II Ia/P Interpolation on Total Area 1.7 ac Peak Time 12.10 hrs Peak Flow 0.93 cfs Given Input Data: Subarea D/S Subareas Area CN Tc Tt Rainfall Description (ac) (hrs) (hrs) (in) Culvert A9 1.7 68 0.11 0.00 2.60 Support Data: Messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 0.10 hrs in row <1>. Page 1 • • • B1-Q25.txt TR -55 Tabular Hydrograph Method Input Summary Description Lake springs PUD: Proposed Conditions: 25 -yr: Culvert 61 Rainfall Distribution Type II Ia/P Interpolation On Total Area 8.5 ac Peak Time 12.20 hrs Peak Flow 6.21 cfs Given Input Data: Subarea D/S Subareas Area CN Tc Tt Rainfall Description (ac) (hrs) (hrs) (in) Culvert 61 8.5 79 0.19 0.00 2.20 Support Data: Messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 0.20 hrs in row <1>. Page 1 • • • B1-Q100.txt TR -55 Tabular Hydrograph Method Input Summary Description Lake Springs PUD: Proposed Conditions: 100 -yr: Culvert 61 Rainfall Distribution Type II Ia/P Interpolation On Total Area 8.5 ac Peak Time 12.20 hrs Peak Flow 8.97 cfs Given Input Data: Subarea D/S Subareas Area CN Tc Tt Rainfall Description (ac) (hrs) (hrs) (in) Culvert 61 8.5 79 0.19 0.00 2.60 Support Data: Messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 0.20 hrs in row <1>. Page 1 • • • B2-Q25.txt TR -55 Tabular Hydrograph Method Input Summary Description Lake Springs PUD: Proposed Conditions: 25 -yr: Culvert 62 Rainfall Distribution Type II Ia/P Interpolation On Total Area 25.6 ac Peak Time 12.20 hrs Peak Flow 11.91 cfs Given Input Data: Subarea D/S Subareas Area CN Tc Tt Rainfall Description (ac) (hrs) (hrs) (in) Culvert 62 25.6 74 0.21 0.00 2.20 Support Data: Messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 0.20 hrs in row <1>. Page 1 B2-Q100.txt • TR -55 Tabular Hydrograph Method Input Summary Description Lake Springs PUD: Proposed Conditions: 100 -yr: Culvert B2 Rainfall Distribution Type II Ia/P Interpolation On Total Area 25.6 ac Peak Time 12.20 hrs Peak Flow 18.96 cfs • • Given Input Data: Subarea D/S Subareas Area CN Tc Tt Rainfall Description (ac) (hrs) (hrs) (in) Culvert B2 25.6 74 0.21 0.00 2.60 Support Data: Messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 0.20 hrs in row <1>. Page 1 • C1-Q25.txt TR -55 Tabular Hydrograph Method Input Summary Description Lake springs PUD: Proposed Conditions: 25 -yr: culvert C1 Rainfall Distribution Type II Ia/P Interpolation On Total Area 9.1 ac Peak Time 12.10 hrs Peak Flow 2.58 cfs Given Input Data: Subarea D/S Subareas Area CN Tc Tt Rainfall Description (ac) (hrs) (hrs) (in) Culvert c1 9.1 68 0.12 0.00 2.20 Support Data: Messages: Info Time of Concentration rounded to 0.10 hrs in row <1>. • • Page 1 • Cl-Q100.txt TR -55 Tabular Hydrograph Method Input Summary Description Lake Springs PUD: Proposed Conditions: 100 -yr: Culvert C1 Rainfall Distribution Type II Ia/P Interpolation On Total Area 9.1 ac Peak Time 12.10 hrs Peak Flow 5.00 cfs Given Input Data: Subarea D/S Subareas Area CN Tc Tt Rainfall Description (ac) (hrs) (hrs) (in) Culvert Cl 9.1 68 0.12 0.00 2.60 Support Data: Messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 0.10 hrs in row <1>. • • Page 1 • • • C2-Q25.txt TR -55 Tabular Hydrograph Method Input Summary Description Lake Springs PUD: Proposed Conditions: 25 -yr: Culvert C2 Rainfall Distribution Type II Ia/P Interpolation On Total Area 4.6 ac Peak Time 12.10 hrs Peak Flow 1.30 cfs Given Input Data: Subarea D/S Subareas Description Area (ac) CN Tc Tt Rainfall (hrs) (hrs) (in) Culvert C2 4.6 68 0.11 0.00 2.20 Support Data: Messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 0.10 hrs in row <1>. Page 1 C2-Q100.txt TR -55 Tabular Hydrograph Method Input Summary Description Lake Springs PUD: Proposed Conditions: 100 -yr: Culvert C2 Rainfall Distribution Type II Ia/P Interpolation On Total Area 4.6 ac Peak Time 12.10 hrs Peak Flow 2.53 cfs Given Input Data: subarea D/S Subareas Area CN Tc Tt Rainfall Description (ac) (hrs) (hrs) (in) Culvert C2 4.6 68 0.11 0.00 2.60 Support Data: Messages: Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 0.10 hrs in row <1>. • • Page 1 -.6 • • DRAINAGE CRITERIA MANUAL N 0 z z 0 > J v 0 Q W 2 0 0 t 40 4 • - 160 166 - 156 - 144 - 132 - 120 - 7t 10,000 • 6,000 6,000 0.36 .c ... (3.0 .oatl - 3,8.00 0.66 of e - 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 S00 - 600 - 300 - 400 - 300 pf '_ 200 - 600," a From BPR EXAMPLE )i• F4. 0 (t.•1) (1) 1.4 5.4 (23 2.1 6.3 (31 t.2 4.6 °0 I. (loot INLETS 3 CULVERTS - 6. L (3) - 6. - 3 - 6. - 4. - 3. t. 1.5 - L CC 4, H 3. - 2. - 5. sirt T.) 60 t4 - 216 D e 16 15 12 a 1. a'CdbtrR CUE +e ft -P &-7 is' x.47 zyn/,/O yz 47-/,; lI-I!%-RA - 40 t0 r.- -- 10 (A -- - 6 - S To .4. 4441• (2) or (3) N•Nat .- 4 i•f1744144ty to 44444 (1), ti•• •44 gr•4ipit 1041144.1 11M t1xwM 3 0 W 0 sashes, N r•Tff44 !. 111 6. - 2 -ENTRANCE TYPE IMN oii1 rlr.rH to 14.1•x■ t• el•t• ►r •1•H i•� - 1.0 �- .7 - 1.0 - .f -.s - .7 .5 - 1.0 - .6 -.5 - .6 - .5 HEADWATER DEPTH FOR C. M. PIPE CULVERTS WITH INLET CONTROL FIGURE 10 -9. 1 arE SvRr = -J ) Channel Al Depth channel-Al.txt Channel Calculator Given Input Data: Shape Solving for Flowrate Slope Manning's n Height Bottom width Left slope Right slope Computed Results: Depth Velocity Full Flowrate Flow area Flow perimeter Hydraulic radius Top width Area Perimeter Percent full • • Trapezoidal Depth of Flow 10.10 cfs 0.010 ft/ft 0.020 24.00 in 0.00 in 0.330 ft/ft (v/H) 0.330 ft/ft (v/H) 10.70 in .4 4.19 fps 87.01 cfs 2.41 ft2 68.31 in 5.08 in 64.86 in 12.12 ft2 153.17 in 44.59 an 4 -2.-Lr Critical Information Critical depth 11.14 in Critical slope 0.008 ft/ft Critical velocity 3.87 fps Critical area 2.61 ft2 Critical perimeter 71.12 in Critical hydraulic radius 5.29 in Critical top width 67.54 in Specific energy 1.16 ft Minimum energy 1.39 ft Froude number 1.11 Flow condition supercritical Page 1 . channel Al Velocity • channel-A1V.txt Channel Calculator Given Input Data: Shape Solving for Flowrate slope Manning's n Height Bottom width Left slope Right slope Computed Results: Depth velocity Full Flowrate Flow area Flow perimeter Hydraulic radius Top width Area Perimeter Percent full • Trapezoidal Depth of Flow 10.10 cfs 0.066 ft/ft 0.020 24.00 in 0.00 in 0.330 ft/ft (v/H) 0.330 ft/ft (v/H) 7.51 in U5� 8.50 fns 723.53 cfs 1.19 ft2 47.95 in 3.57 in 45.53 in 12.12 ft2 153.17 in 31.31 critical Information critical depth 11.14 in critical slope 0.008 ft/ft critical velocity 3.87 fps Critical area 2.61 ft2 critical perimeter 71.12 in critical hydraulic radius 5.29 in critical top width 67.54 in Specific energy 1.75 ft Minimum energy 1.39 ft Froude number 2.68 Flow condition Supercritical Page 1 RA P14T • channel A2 Depth Channel-A2D.txt Channel calculator Given Input Data: Shape Solving for Flowrate Slope Manning's n Height Bottom width Left slope Right slope computed Results: Depth velocity Full Flowrate Flow area Flow perimeter Hydraulic radius Top width Area Perimeter Percent full Critical Trapezoidal Depth of Flow 2.62 cfs 0.010 ft/ft 0.020 18.00 in 0.00 in 0.330 ft/ft (v/H) 0.330 ft/ft (v/H) Information Critical depth • critical slope Critical velocity critical area critical perimeter Critical hydraulic radius Critical top width Specific energy Minimum energy Froude number Flow condition • 6.45 in +I2" 2.99 fps 40.40 cfs 0.88 ft2 41.18 in 3.06 in 39.11 in 6.82 ft2 114.88 in 35.85 6.50 in 0.010 ft/ft 2.95 fps 0.89 ft2 41.45 in 3.08 in 39.37 in 0.68 ft 0.81 ft 1.02 Supercritical Page 1 _-�/8r ',Channel A2 Velocity Channel-A2V.txt Channel Calculator Given Input Data: Shape Trapezoidal Solving for Depth of Flow Flowrate 2.62 cfs Slope 0.045 ft/ft Manning's n 0.020 Height 18.00 in Bottom width 0.00 in Left slope 0.330 ft/ft (V/H) Right slope 0.330 ft/ft (V/H) Computed Results: Depth 4.87 in velocity 5.26 fps Full Flowrate 85.71 cfs Flow area 0.50 ft2 Flow perimeter 31.06 in Hydraulic radius 2.31 in Top width 29.50 in Area 6.82 ft2 Perimeter 114.88 in Percent full 27.04 Critical Information Critical depth • Critical slope Critical velocity Critical area Critical perimeter Critical hydraulic radius Critical top width Specific energy Minimum energy Froude number Flow condition • G Rp5S 6.50 in 0.010 ft/ft 2.95 fps 0.89 ft2 41.45 in 3.08 in 39.37 in 0.83 ft 0.81 ft 2.06 Supercritical Page 1 LvNIE • • • Channel A3 Depth Channel-A3D.txt Channel Calculator Given Input Data: Shape Trapezoidal Solving for Depth of Flow Flowrate 42.45 cfs Slope 0.010 ft/ft Manning's n 0.020 Height 30.00 in Bottom width 0.00 in Left slope 0.330 ft/ft (v/H) Right slope 0.330 ft/ft (v/H) Computed Results:3 b" Depth 18.34 i n -{-12 Velocity 6.00 fps Full Flowrate 157.76 cfs Flow area 7.08 ft2 Flow perimeter 117.03 in Hydraulic radius 8.71 in Top width 111.13 in Area 18.94 ft2 Perimeter 191.46 in Percent full 61.12 Critical Information Critical depth Critical slope Critical velocity Critical area Critical perimeter Critical hydraulic radius Critical top width Specific energy Minimum energy Froude number Flow condition 19.79 in 0.007 ft/ft 5.15 fps 8.24 ft2 126.30 in 9.40 in 119.94 in 2.09 ft 2.47 ft 1.21 Supercritical Page 1 Channel A3 velocity 1 Channel-A3v.txt Channel Calculator Given Input Data: shape Solving for Flowrate Slope Manning's n Height Bottom width Left slope Right slope Computed Results: Depth Velocity Full Flowrate Flow area Flow perimeter Hydraulic radius Top width Area Perimeter Percent full • Critical Trapezoidal Depth of Flow 42.45 cfs 0.083 ft/ft 0.020 30.00 in 0.00 in 0.330 ft/ft (V/H) 0.330 ft/ft (v/H) Information Critical depth Critical slope Critical velocity Critical area critical perimeter Critical hydraulic Critical top width specific energy Minimum energy Froude number Flow condition 12.33 in 13.27 fps USE ?14T 454.50 cfs 3.20 ft2 78.70 in 5.85 in 74.73 in 18.94 ft2 191.46 in 41.10 % 19.79 in 0.007 ft/ft 5.15 fps 8.24 ft2 126.30 in radius 9.40 in 119.94 in 3.76 ft 2.47 ft 3.26 Supercritical Page 1 Channel A4 Depth Channel-A4D.txt Channel Calculator Given Input Data: Shape solving for Flowrate Slope Manning's n Height Bottom width Left slope Right slope Computed Results: Depth Velocity Full Flowrate Flow area Flow perimeter Hydraulic radius Top width Area Perimeter Percent full Trapezoidal Depth of Flow 14.92 cfs 0.010 ft/ft 0.020 24.00 in 0.00 in 0.330 ft/ft (v/H) 0.330 ft/ft (v/H) critical Information Critical depth Critical slope Critical velocity Critical area Critical perimeter critical hydraulic Critical top width Specific energy Minimum energy Froude number Flow condition 12.39 in -j-12" 4.62 fps 87.01 cfs 3.23 ft2 79.07 in 5.88 in 75.08 in 12.12 ft2 153.17 in 51.62 % 13.03 in 0.008 ft/ft 4.18 fps 3.57 ft2 83.13 in radius 6.18 in 78.94 in 1.36 ft 1.63 ft 1.13 Supercritical • Page 1 2-1 411Channel A4 Velocity Channel-A4V.txt Channel Calculator Given Input Data: Shape solving for Flowrate Slope Manning's n Height Bottom width Left slope Right slope Computed Results: Depth Velocity Full Flowrate Flow area Flow perimeter Hydraulic radius Top width Area Perimeter Percent full Critical Trapezoidal Depth of Flow 14.92 cfs 0.138 ft/ft 0.020 24.00 in 0.00 in 0.330 ft/ft (v/H) 0.330 ft/ft (v/H) Information 7.57 in 12.36 fDs. = USE rNRAnn 4T 323.23 cfs 1.21 ft2 48.34 in 3.60 in 45.90 in 12.12 ft2 153.17 in 31.56 % Critical depth 13.03 in Critical slope 0.008 ft/ft • Critical velocity 4.18 fps Critical area 3.57 ft2 Critical perimeter 83.13 in Critical hydraulic radius 6.18 in Critical top width 78.94 in Specific energy 3.01 ft Minimum energy 1.63 ft Froude number 3.88 Flow condition supercritical • Page 1 • Channel A5 Depth • • Channel-A5D.txt Channel Calculator Given Input Data: Shape Trapezoidal solving for Depth of Flow Flowrate 25.41 cfs Slope 0.010 ft/ft Manning's n 0.020 Height 30.00 in Bottom width 0.00 in Left slope 0.330 ft/ft (v/H) Right slope 0.330 ft/ft (v/H) Computed Results: „ Depth 15.13 in -x-12 30 Velocity 5.28 fps Full Flowrate 157.76 cfs Flow area 4.82 ft2 Flow perimeter 96.54 in Hydraulic radius 7.18 in Top width 91.68 in Area 18.94 ft2 Perimeter 191.46 in Percent full 50.42 Critical Information Critical depth Critical slope Critical velocity Critical area critical perimeter Critical hydraulic radius Critical top width Specific energy Minimum energy Froude number Flow condition 16.12 in 0.007 ft/ft 4.65 fps 5.47 ft2 102.86 in 7.65 in 97.68 in 1.69 ft 2.01 ft 1.17 Supercritical Page 1 • • Channel A5 Velocity Channel-A5v.txt Channel Calculator Given Input Data: shape Solving for Flowrate Slope Manning's n Height Bottom width Left slope Right slope Computed Results: Depth Velocity Full Flowrate Flow area Flow perimeter Hydraulic radius Top width Area Perimeter Percent full Critical Trapezoidal Depth of Flow 25.41 cfs 0.074 ft/ft 0.020 30.00 in 0.00 in 0.330 ft/ft (v/H) 0.330 ft/ft (v/H) Information Critical depth Critical slope Critical velocity Critical area Critical perimeter Critical hydraulic Critical top width Specific energy Minimum energy Froude number Flow condition 10.39 in 11.18 fres USE -1-1104-01/fr cfs 2.27 ft2 66.33 in 4.94 in 62.99 in 18.94 ft2 191.46 in 34.65 % 16.12 in 0.007 ft/ft 4.65 fps 5.47 ft2 102.86 in radius 7.65 in 97.68 in 2.81 ft 2.01 ft 2.99 Supercritical Page 1 • • Channel A6 Depth channel-A6D.txt Channel Calculator Given Input Data: Shape Trapezoidal solving for Depth of Flow Flowrate 33.01 cfs Slope 0.010 ft/ft Manning's n 0.020 Height 30.00 in Bottom width 0.00 in Left slope 0.330 ft/ft (v/H) Right slope 0.330 ft/ft (V/H) Computed Results: �� Depth 16.69 in -i-f2.4=== 30 velocity 5.63 fps Full Flowrate 157.76 cfs Flow area 5.86 ft2 Flow perimeter 106.49 in Hydraulic radius 7.92 in Top width 101.13 in Area 18.94 ft2 Perimeter 191.46 in Percent full 55.62 Critical Information Critical depth Critical slope Critical velocity Critical area Critical perimeter Critical hydraulic radius critical top width Specific energy Minimum energy Froude number Flow condition 17.90 in 0.007 ft/ft 4.90 fps 6.74 ft2 114.21 in 8.50 in 108.46 in 1.88 ft 2.24 ft 1.19 Supercritical Page 1 • Channel A6 velocity • • Channel-A6v.txt Channel Calculator Given Input Data: Shape Solving for Flowrate Slope Manning's n Height Bottom width Left slope Right slope Computed Results: Depth velocity Full Flowrate Flow area Flow perimeter Hydraulic radius Top width Area Perimeter Percent full Critical Trapezoidal Depth of Flow 33.01 cfs 0.094 ft/ft 0.020 30.00 in 0.00 in 0.330 ft/ft (v/H) 0.330 ft/ft (v/H) Information Critical depth Critical slope Critical velocity Critical area Critical perimeter Critical hydraulic Critical top width Specific energy Minimum energy Froude number Flow condition 10.96 in 1 05 fns USE Pyg41-1A4 483.68 cfs 2.53 ft2 69.96 in 5.21 in 66.44 in 18.94 ft2 191.46 in 36.54 17.90 in 0.007 ft/ft 4.90 fps 6.74 ft2 114.21 in radius 8.50 in 108.46 in 3.56 ft 2.24 ft 3.41 Supercritical Page 1 • • Channel A7 Depth channel-A7D.txt Channel Calculator Given Input Data: shape Trapezoidal solving for Depth of Flow Flowrate 5.12 cfs Slope 0.010 ft/ft Manning's n 0.020 Height 24.00 in Bottom width 0.00 in Left slope 0.330 ft/ft (v/H) Right slope 0.330 ft/ft (v/H) Computed Results: Depth velocity Full Flowrate Flow area Flow perimeter Hydraulic radius Top width Area Perimeter Percent full Critical Information Critical depth Critical slope Critical velocity Critical area Critical perimeter Critical hydraulic radius Critical top width Specific energy Minimum energy Froude number Flow condition 8.30 in 112,E 3.54 fps 87.01 cfs 1.45 ft2 52.94 in 3.94 in 50.28 in 12.12 ft2 153.17 in 34.57 8.49 in 0.009 ft/ft 3.37 fps 1.52 ft2 54.20 in 4.03 in 51.47 in 0.89 ft 1.06 ft 1.06 Supercritical Page 1 2yn • Channel A7 Velocity Channel-A7V.txt Channel Calculator Given Input Data: Shape Solving for Flowrate Slope Manning's n Height Bottom width Left slope Right slope Computed Results: Depth Velocity Full Flowrate Flow area Flow perimeter Hydraulic radius Top width Area Perimeter Percent full Trapezoidal Depth of Flow 5.12 cfs 0.069 ft/ft 0.020 24.00 in 0.00 in 0.330 ft/ft (v/H) 0.330 ft/ft (v/H) 5.78 in USE Y RPrf,, 4-r-- _7.29 fps X1+4" 228.56 cfs 0.70 ft2 36.86 in 2.74 in 35.00 in 12.12 ft2 153.17 in 24.06 Critical Information Critical depth 8.49 in Critical slope 0.009 ft/ft • Critical velocity 3.37 fps Critical area 1.52 ft2 critical perimeter 54.20 in Critical hydraulic radius 4.03 in Critical top width 51.47 in specific energy 1.31 ft Minimum energy 1.06 ft Froude number 2.62 Flow condition supercritical • Page 1 • Channel A8 Depth • • Channel-A8D.txt Channel Calculator Given Input Data: Shape solving for Flowrate Slope Manning's n Height Bottom width Left slope Right slope Computed Results: Depth velocity Full Flowrate Flow area Flow perimeter Hydraulic radius Top width Area Perimeter Percent full Critical Trapezoidal Depth of Flow 10.19 cfs 0.010 ft/ft 0.020 24.00 in 0.00 in 0.330 ft/ft (v/H) 0.330 ft/ft (v/H) Information Critical depth Critical slope Critical velocity Critical area Critical perimeter Critical hydraulic Critical top width Specific energy Minimum energy Froude number Flow condition 10.74 in -f/24 21V° 4.20 fps 87.01 cfs 2.43 ft2 68.53 in 5.10 in 65.08 in 12.12 ft2 153.17 in 44.74 11.18 in 0.008 ft/ft 3.87 fps 2.63 ft2 71.37 in radius 5.31 in 67.78 in 1.17 ft 1.40 ft 1.11 supercritical Page 1 IlIchannel A8 velocity • • Channel-A8v.txt Channel Calculator Given Input Data: Shape Solving for Flowrate Slope Manning's n Height Bottom width Left slope Right slope Computed Results: Depth velocity Full Flowrate Flow area Flow perimeter Hydraulic radius Top width Area Perimeter Percent full critical Trapezoidal Depth of Flow 10.19 cfs 0.079 ft/ft 0.020 24.00 in 0.00 in 0.330 ft/ft (v/H) 0.330 ft/ft (v/H) Information Critical depth Critical slope Critical velocity Critical area Critical perimeter critical hydraulic radius Critical top width Specific energy Minimum energy Froude number Flow condition 7.29 in 9.12 fps ==17 usE Pym rric- 244.56 cfs 1.12 ft2 46.52 in 3.46 in 44.17 in 12.12 ft2 153.17 in 30.37 11.18 in 0.008 ft/ft 3.87 fps 2.63 ft2 71.37 in 5.31 in 67.78 in 1.90 ft 1.40 ft 2.92 Supercritical Page 1 • channel A9 Depth Channel-A9D.txt Channel Calculator Given Input Data: shape Solving for Flowrate Slope Manning's n Height Bottom width Left slope Right slope Trapezoidal Depth of Flow 10.67 cfs 0.010 ft/ft 0.020 24.00 in 0.00 in 0.330 ft/ft (v/H) 0.330 ft/ft (v/H) Computed Results:" Depth 10.93 in 4-- IZ Z -Li velocity 4.25 fps Full Flowrate 87.01 cfs Flow area 2.51 ft2 Flow perimeter 69.73 in Hydraulic radius 5.19 in Top width 66.21 in Area 12.12 ft2 Perimeter 153.17 in Percent full 45.52 Critical Information Critical depth Critical slope • critical velocity Critical area Critical perimeter Critical hydraulic radius Critical top width specific energy Minimum energy Froude number Flow condition • 11.39 in 0.008 ft/ft 3.91 fps 2.73 ft2 72.70 in 5.41 in 69.04 in 1.19 ft 1.42 ft 1.11 Supercritical Page 1 •Channel A9 velocity • • Channel-A9v.txt Channel Calculator Given Input Data: Shape Solving for Flowrate Slope Manning's n Height Bottom width Left slope Right slope Computed Results: Depth velocity Full Flowrate Flow area Flow perimeter Hydraulic radius Top width Area Perimeter Percent full Trapezoidal Depth of Flow 10.67 cfs 0.058 ft/ft 0.020 24.00 in 0.00 in 0.330 ft/ft (v/H) 0.330 ft/ft (v/H) 7.86 in 8.21 fos USE ?yRA-mA-% 209.55 cfs 1.30 ft2 50.15 in 3.73 in 47.62 in 12.12 ft2 153.17 in 32.74 Critical Information Critical depth 11.39 in Critical slope 0.008 ft/ft critical velocity 3.91 fps Critical area 2.73 ft2 Critical perimeter 72.70 in critical hydraulic radius 5.41 in Critical top width 69.04 in Specific energy 1.70 ft Minimum energy 1.42 ft Froude number 2.53 Flow condition supercritical Page 1 • Channel B1 Depth Channel-B1D.txt Channel Calculator Given Input Data: Shape Solving for Flowrate Slope Manning's n Height Bottom width Left slope Right slope Computed Results: Depth Velocity Full Flowrate Flow area Flow perimeter Hydraulic radius Top width Area Perimeter Percent full Critical Information Critical depth 111/ Critical slope Critical velocity Critical area Critical perimeter Critical hydraulic radius Critical top width Specific energy Minimum energy Froude number Flow condition • Trapezoidal Depth of Flow 8.97 cfs 0.010 ft/ft 0.020 24.00 in 0.00 in 0.330 ft/ft (v/H) 0.330 ft/ft (v/H) 10.24 in -t-12" 2.441 4.07 fps 87.01 cfs 2.21 ft2 65.33 in 4.86 in 62.04 in 12.12 ft2 153.17 in 42.65 10.63 in 0.008 ft/ft 3.77 fps 2.38 ft2 67.82 in 5.05 in 64.41 in 1.11 ft 1.33 ft 1.10 Supercritical Page 1 • Channel B1 velocity channel-B1V.txt Channel calculator Given Input Data: shape Trapezoidal Solving for Depth of Flow Flowrate 8.97 cfs Slope 0.046 ft/ft Manning's n 0.020 Height 24.00 in Bottom width 0.00 in Left slope 0.330 ft/ft (V/H) Right slope 0.330 ft/ft (v/H) Computed Results: Depth 7.69 in Velocity L.21_fps ---05e Full Flowrate 186.62 cfs Flow area 1.24 ft2 Flow perimeter 49.08 in Hydraulic radius 3.65 in Top width 46.60 in Area 12.12 ft2 Perimeter 153.17 in Percent full 32.04 Critical Information Critical depth • Critical slope Critical velocity Critical area Critical perimeter critical hydraulic radius Critical top width Specific energy Minimum energy Froude number Flow condition • 10.63 in 0.008 ft/ft 3.77 fps 2.38 ft2 67.82 in 5.05 in 64.41 in 1.45 ft 1.33 ft 2.25 Supercritical Page 1 PygAmi47— • Channel 62 Depth • Channel-B2D.txt Channel Calculator Given Input Data: shape Trapezoidal solving for Depth of Flow Flowrate 27.93 cfs slope 0.010 ft/ft Manning's n 0.020 Height 24.00 in Bottom width 0.00 in Left slope 0.330 ft/ft (V/H) Right slope 0.330 ft/ft (v/H) Computed Results: Depth 15.67 in t12-" 3b velocity 5.40 fps Full Flowrate 87.01 cfs Flow area 5.17 ft2 Flow perimeter 100.03 in Hydraulic radius 7.44 in Top width 94.99 in Area 12.12 ft2 Perimeter 153.17 in Percent full 65.30 Critical Information Critical depth Critical slope Critical velocity Critical area Critical perimeter Critical hydraulic radius Critical top width specific energy Minimum energy Froude number Flow condition 16.74 in 0.007 ft/ft 4.74 fps 5.90 ft2 106.83 in 7.95 in 101.45 in 1.76 ft 2.09 ft 1.18 Supercritical Page 1 • Channel B2 velocity • Channel-B2V.txt channel Calculator Given Input Data: Shape Trapezoidal Solving for Depth of Flow Flowrate 27.93 cfs Slope 0.086 ft/ft Manning's n 0.020 Height 24.00 in Bottom width 0.00 in Left slope 0.330 ft/ft (V/H) Right slope 0.330 ft/ft (V/H) Computed Results: Depth 10.47 in Velocity _1_2__11f��_s USE F`/Fok'"'AT Full Flowrate52 5.16 cfs Flow area 2.31 ft2 Flow perimeter 66.82 in Hydraulic radius 4.97 in Top width 63.45 in Area 12.12 ft2 Perimeter 153.17 in Percent full 43.62 Critical Information Critical depth Critical slope Critical velocity Critical area Critical perimeter critical hydraulic radius Critical top width Specific energy Minimum energy Froude number Flow condition 16.74 in 0.007 ft/ft 4.74 fps 5.90 ft2 106.83 in 7.95 in 101.45 in 3.15 ft 2.09 ft 3.23 Supercritical Page 1 • • • Channel C1 Depth Channel-C1D.txt Channel Calculator Given Input Data: Shape Trapezoidal Solving for Depth of Flow Flowrate 2.58 cfs Slope 0.010 ft/ft Manning's n 0.020 Height 24.00 in Bottom width 0.00 in Left slope 0.330 ft/ft (V/H) Right slope 0.330 ft/ft (v/H) Computed Results: �Z„� �8 a Depth 6.42 in fi velocity 2.98 fps Full Flowrate 87.01 cfs Flow area 0.87 ft2 Flow perimeter 40.94 in Hydraulic radius 3.05 in Top width 38.88 in Area 12.12 ft2 Perimeter 153.17 in Percent full 26.73 Critical Information Critical depth Critical slope Critical velocity Critical area Critical perimeter critical hydraulic radius Critical top width Specific energy Minimum energy Froude number Flow condition 6.46 in 0.010 ft/ft 2.94 fps 0.88 ft2 41.20 in 3.07 in 39.13 in 0.67 ft 0.81 ft 1.02 Supercritical Page 1 OChannel cl velocity • • Channel-c1v.txt Channel Calculator Given Input Data: shape solving for Flowrate Slope Manning's n Height Bottom width Left slope Right slope Computed Results: Depth velocity Full Flowrate Flow area Flow perimeter Hydraulic radius Top width Area Perimeter Percent full Trapezoidal Depth of Flow 2.58 cfs 0.058 ft/ft 0.020 24.00 in 0.00 in 0.330 ft/ft (v/H) 0.330 ft/ft (v/H) 4.61 in 5.76 fps 4' 6rz4Ss LDVE 209.55 cfs 0.45 ft2 29.45 in 2.19 in 27.96 in 12.12 ft2 153.17 in 19.23 critical Information Critical depth 6.46 in Critical slope 0.010 ft/ft Critical velocity 2.94 fps Critical area 0.88 ft2 Critical perimeter 41.20 in Critical hydraulic radius 3.07 in Critical top width 39.13 in Specific energy 0.90 ft Minimum energy 0.81 ft Froude number 2.32 Flow condition Supercritical Page 1 • Channel c2 Depth Channel-C2D.txt Channel calculator Given Input Data: Shape Solving for Flowrate Slope Manning's n Height Bottom width Left slope Right slope Computed Results: Depth velocity Full Flowrate Flow area Flow perimeter Hydraulic radius Top width Area Perimeter Percent full Critical Information Critical depth Critical slope • Critical velocity Critical area Critical perimeter critical hydraulic radius Critical top width Specific energy Minimum energy Froude number Flow condition • Trapezoidal Depth of Flow 1.30 cfs 0.010 ft/ft 0.020 24.00 in 0.00 in 0.330 ft/ft (v/H) 0.330 ft/ft (v/H) 4.96 i n 'f'/2/" -> /Sl/ 2.51 fps 87.01 cfs 0.52 ft2 31.66 in 2.36 in 30.07 in 12.12 ft2 153.17 in 20.67 4.91 in 0.011 ft/ft 2.56 fps 0.51 ft2 31.32 in 2.33 in 29.74 in 0.51 ft 0.61 ft 0.97 Subcritical Page 1 III/channel C2 velocity Channel-C2v.txt Channel Calculator Given Input Data: Shape Solving for Flowrate Slope Manning's n Height Bottom width Left slope Right slope computed Results: Depth Velocity Full Flowrate Flow area Flow perimeter Hydraulic radius Top width Area Perimeter Percent full Critical Trapezoidal Depth of Flow 1.30 cfs 0.100 ft/ft 0.020 24.00 in 0.00 in 0.330 ft/ft (v/H) 0.330 ft/ft (v/H) 3.22 in 5.45 fps =� 4z' s5 L.x JE 275.15 cfs 0.22 ft2 20.56 in 1.53 in 19.53 in 12.12 ft2 153.17 in 13.42 Information Critical depth 4.91 in Critical slope 0.011 ft/ft III Critical velocity 2.56 fps critical area 0.51 ft2 Critical perimeter 31.32 in critical hydraulic radius 2.33 in Critical top width 29.74 in specific energy 0.82 ft Minimum energy 0.61 ft Froude number 2.86 Flow condition supercritical • Page 1 Channel C3 Depth Channel-C3D.txt Channel Calculator Given Input Data: Shape Trapezoidal solving for Depth of Flow Flowrate 1.67 cfs slope 0.010 ft/ft Manning's n 0.020 Height 24.00 in Bottom width 0.00 in Left slope 0.330 ft/ft (v/H) Right slope 0.330 ft/ft (v/H) Computed Results: Depth 5.45 in *'- velocity 2.67 fps Full Flowrate 87.01 cfs Flow area 0.63 ft2 Flow perimeter 34.78 in Hydraulic radius 2.59 in Top width 33.03 in Area 12.12 ft2 Perimeter 153.17 in Percent full 22.71 Critical Information Critical depth Critical slope Critical velocity Critical area Critical perimeter critical hydraulic radius Critical top width Specific energy Minimum energy Froude number Flow condition 5.42 in 0.010 ft/ft 2.70 fps 0.62 ft2 34.62 in 2.58 in 32.88 in 0.57 ft 0.68 ft 0.99 Subcritical • • Channel C3 velocity Channel-C3v.txt Channel Calculator Given Input Data: Shape Solving for Flowrate Slope Manning's n Height Bottom width Left slope Right slope Computed Results: Depth Velocity Full Flowrate Flow area Flow perimeter Hydraulic radius Top width Area Perimeter Percent full Trapezoidal Depth of Flow 1.67 cfs 0.109 ft/ft 0.020 24.00 in 0.00 in 0.330 ft/ft (v/H) 0.330 ft/ft (v/H) 3.48 in 6.5 s .ir e ?yR4 mk r 87.27 cfs 0.26 ft2 22.22 in 1.65 in 21.11 in 12.12 ft2 153.17 in 14.51 % Critical Information Critical depth 5.42 in Critical slope 0.010 ft/ft Critical velocity 2.70 fps Critical area 0.62 ft2 Critical perimeter 34.62 in Critical hydraulic radius 2.58 in Critical top width 32.88 in Specific energy 0.96 ft Minimum energy 0.68 ft Froude number 3.03 Flow condition Supercritical Page 1 Channel C4 Depth Channel-C4D.txt Channel Calculator Given Input Data: Shape Trapezoidal solving for Depth of Flow Flowrate 1.76 cfs Slope 0.010 ft/ft Manning's n 0.020 Height 24.00 in Bottom width 0.00 in Left slope 0.330 ft/ft (v/H) Right slope 0.330 ft/ft (v/H) Computed Results: Depth 5.56 in 1-/2"' ' /e," Velocity 2.71 fps Full Flowrate 87.01 cfs Flow area 0.65 ft2 Flow perimeter Hydraulic radius Top width Area Perimeter Percent full Critical Information Critical depth Critical slope Critical velocity Critical area Critical perimeter Critical hydraulic radius Critical top width Specific energy Minimum energy Froude number Flow condition • 35.47 in 2.64 in 33.69 in 12.12 ft2 153.17 in 23.16 5.54 in 0.010 ft/ft 2.73 fps 0.65 ft2 35.36 in 2.63 in 33.57 in 0.58 ft 0.69 ft 0.99 subcritical Page 1 • Channel C4 Velocity • • Channel-C4v.txt Channel Calculator Given Input Data: Shape Solving for Flowrate Slope Manning's n Height Bottom width Left slope Right slope Computed Results: Depth Velocity Full Flowrate Flow area Flow perimeter Hydraulic radius Top width area Perimeter Percent full Critical Information Critical depth Critical slope Critical velocity Critical area Critical perimeter Critical hydraulic radius Critical top width Specific energy Minimum energy Froude number Flow condition Trapezoidal Depth of Flow 1.76 cfs 0.090 ft/ft 0.020 24.00 in 0.00 in 0.330 ft/ft (v/H) 0.330 ft/ft (v/H) 3.68 in 6.17 fps - CiSe ey m4T 261.03 cfs 0.29 ft2 23.50 in 1.75 in 22.31 in 12.12 ft2 153.17 in 15.34 % 5.54 in 0.010 ft/ft 2.73 fps 0.65 ft2 35.36 in 2.63 in 33.57 in 0.90 ft 0.69 ft 2.78 Supercritical Page 1 • Channel D1 Depth • • Channel-D1D.txt Channel Calculator Given Input Data: Shape Solving for Flowrate Slope Manning's n Height Bottom width Left slope Right slope Computed Results: Depth Velocity Full Flowrate Flow area Flow perimeter Hydraulic radius Top width Area Perimeter Percent full Trapezoidal Depth of Flow 5.78 cfs 0.010 ft/ft 0.020 24.00 in 0.00 in 0.330 ft/ft (v/H) 0.330 ft/ft (v/H) 8.68 in 3.64 fps 87.01 cfs 1.59 ft2 55.41 in 4.12 in 52.62 in 12.12 ft2 153.17 in 36.17 Critical Information Critical depth 8.91 in Critical slope 0.009 ft/ft Critical velocity 3.46 fps Critical area 1.67 ft2 Critical perimeter 56.89 in Critical hydraulic radius 4.23 in Critical top width 54.02 in Specific energy 0.93 ft Minimum energy 1.11 ft Froude number 1.07 Flow condition Supercritical Page 1 0 Channel D1 velocity Channel-D1v.txt Channel calculator Given Input Data: Shape solving for Flowrate slope Manning's n Height Bottom width Left slope Right slope Computed Results: Depth velocity Full Flowrate Flow area Flow perimeter Hydraulic radius Top width Area Perimeter Percent full Critical Information Critical depth Critical slope 411 Critical velocity Critical area Critical perimeter Critical hydraulic radius Critical top width Specific energy Minimum energy Froude number Flow condition • Trapezoidal Depth of Flow 5.78 cfs 0.065 ft/ft 0.020 24.00 in 0.00 in 0.330 ft/ft (v/H) 0.330 ft/ft (v/H) 6.11 in 7.35 fps =� use T 1 12 A ► T' 221.83 cfs 0.79 ft2 39.01 in 2.90 in 37.04 in 12.12 ft2 153.17 in 25.47 8.91 in 0.009 ft/ft 3.46 fps 1.67 ft2 56.89 in 4.23 in 54.02 in 1.35 ft 1.11 ft 2.57 Supercritical Page 1 •Channel D2 Depth Channel-D2D.txt Channel calculator Given Input Data: Shape Solving for Flowrate Slope Manning's n Height Bottom width Left slope Right slope Computed Results: Depth Velocity Full Flowrate Flow area Flow perimeter Hydraulic radius Top width Area Perimeter Percent full Critical Information critical depth Critical slope • critical velocity Critical area Critical perimeter Critical hydraulic radius Critical top width Specific energy Minimum energy Froude number Flow condition 1 Trapezoidal Depth of Flow 4.24 cfs 0.010 ft/ft 0.020 24.00 in 0.00 in 0.330 ft/ft (v/H) 0.330 ft/ft (v/H) 7.73 in 7/f( 7-=? Z4? 3.37 fps 87.01 cfs 1.26 ft2 49.33 in 3.67 in 46.84 in 12.12 ft2 153.17 in 32.20 % 7.87 in 0.009 ft/ft 3.25 fps 1.30 ft2 50.26 in 3.74 in 47.73 in 0.82 ft 0.98 ft 1.05 supercritical Page 1 • • Channel D2 velocity Channel-D2V.txt Channel calculator Given Input Data: Shape Solving for Flowrate Slope Manning's n Height Bottom width Left slope Right slope Computed Results: Depth velocity Full Flowrate Flow area Flow perimeter Hydraulic radius Top width Area Perimeter Percent full Trapezoidal Depth of Flow 4.24 cfs 0.143 ft/ft 0.020 24.00 in 0.00 in 0.330 ft/ft (v/H) 0.330 ft/ft (v/H) 4.69 in 9.15 fps U5E p/g f)1, 329.03 cfs 0.46 ft2 29.96 in 2.23 in 28.45 in 12.12 ft2 153.17 in 19.56 Critical Information Critical depth 7.87 in Critical slope 0.009 ft/ft Critical velocity 3.25 fps Critical area 1.30 ft2 Critical perimeter 50.26 in Critical hydraulic radius 3.74 in Critical top width 47.73 in Specific energy 1.69 ft Minimum energy 0.98 ft Froude number 3.65 Flow condition Supercritical Page 1 .Channel D3 Depth • • Channel-D3D.txt channel Calculator Given Input Data: shape Solving for Flowrate Slope Manning's n Height Bottom width Left slope Right slope Computed Results: Depth velocity Full Flowrate Flow area Flow perimeter Hydraulic radius Top width Area Perimeter Percent full Critical Information Critical depth Critical slope Critical velocity Critical area Critical perimeter Critical hydraulic radius critical top width specific energy Minimum energy Froude number Flow condition Trapezoidal Depth of Flow 19.67 cfs 0.010 ft/ft 0.020 24.00 in 0.00 in 0.330 ft/ft (v/H) 0.330 ft/ft (v/H) 13.74 in 74-12:f---17 a 4.95 fps 87.01 cfs 3.97 ft2 87.70 in 6.52 in 83.28 in 12.12 ft2 153.17 in 57.26 14.55 in 0.007 ft/ft 4.42 fps 4.45 ft2 92.85 in 6.91 in 88.17 in 1.53 ft 1.82 ft 1.15 Supercritical Page 1 • • Channel D3 Velocity Channel-D3v.txt Channel calculator Given Input Data: Shape solving for Flowrate Slope Manning's n Height Bottom width Left slope Right slope Computed Results: Depth Velocity Full Flowrate Flow area Flow perimeter Hydraulic radius Top width Area Perimeter Percent full Critical Information Critical depth Critical slope Critical velocity Critical area Critical perimeter Critical hydraulic radius Critical top width Specific energy Minimum energy Froude number Flow condition Trapezoidal Depth of Flow 19.67 cfs 0.091 ft/ft 0.020 24.00 in 0.00 in 0.330 ft/ft (v/H) 0.330 ft/ft (v/H) 9.08 in SC Z4Mf}. i 11 .33 fns 4 V Py 262.48 cfs 1.74 ft2 57.97 in 4.31 in 55.05 in 12.12 ft2 153.17 in 37.85 14.55 in 0.007 ft/ft 4.42 fps 4.45 ft2 92.85 in 6.91 in 88.17 in 2.75 ft 1.82 ft 3.25 Supercritical Page 1 •Channel E1 Depth • • Channel-E1D.txt Channel Calculator Given Input Data: Shape solving for Flowrate Slope Manning's n Height Bottom width Left slope Right slope Computed Results: Depth Velocity Full Flowrate Flow area Flow perimeter Hydraulic radius Top width Area Perimeter Percent full Trapezoidal Depth of Flow 8.69 cfs 0.010 ft/ft 0.020 24.00 in 0.00 in 0.330 ft/ft (v/H) 0.330 ft/ft (v/H) Critical Information Critical depth Critical slope Critical velocity Critical area Critical perimeter Critical hydraulic Critical top width Specific energy Minimum energy Froude number Flow condition 10.12 in 7'/ Z" Z L/ 4.04 fps 87.01 cfs 2.15 ft2 64.56 in 4.80 in 61.31 in 12.12 ft2 153.17 in 42.15 10.49 in 0.008 ft/ft 3.75 fps 2.32 ft2 66.97 in radius 4.98 in 63.59 in 1.10 ft 1.31 ft 1.10 Supercritical Page 1 ,i 0 Channel El velocity • channel-E1V.txt channel calculator Given Input Data: Shape Solving for Flowrate slope Manning's n Height Bottom width Left slope Right slope Computed Results: Depth velocity Full Flowrate Flow area Flow perimeter Hydraulic radius Top width Area Perimeter Percent full Critical Information Critical depth Critical slope Critical velocity Critical area Critical perimeter Critical hydraulic radius Critical top width Specific energy Minimum energy Froude number Flow condition Trapezoidal Depth of Flow 8.69 cfs 0.083 ft/ft 0.020 24.00 in 0.00 in 0.330 ft/ft (v/H) 0.330 ft/ft (v/H) 6.80 in _8. i USC— -PY tnA-i 250.67 cfs 0.97 ft2 43.41 in 3.23 in 41.23 in 12.12 ft2 153.17 in 28.34 % 10.49 in 0.008 ft/ft 3.75 fps 2.32 ft2 66.97 in 4.98 in 63.59 in 1.80 ft 1.31 ft 2.95 Supercritical Page 1 .Channel F1 Depth • • Channel-F1D.txt Channel Calculator Given Input Data: Shape Solving for Flowrate Slope Manning's n Height Bottom width Left slope Right slope Trapezoidal Depth of Flow 10.20 cfs 0.010 ft/ft 0.020 24.00 in 0.00 in 0.330 ft/ft (v/H) 0.330 ft/ft (v/H) Computed Results: Depth 10.74 in 11-12!/' =� Zy velocity 4.20 fps Full Flowrate 87.01 cfs Flow area 2.43 ft2 Flow perimeter Hydraulic radius Top width Area Perimeter Percent full Critical Information critical depth Critical slope Critical velocity Critical area Critical perimeter critical hydraulic radius Critical top width Specific energy Minimum energy Froude number Flow condition 68.56 in 5.10 in 65.10 in 12.12 ft2 153.17 in 44.76 % 11.19 in 0.008 ft/ft 3.87 fps 2.63 ft2 71.40 in 5.31 in 67.80 in 1.17 ft 1.40 ft 1.11 Supercritical Page 1 Fww SPL T Use ! Si' 4111 Channel F1 Velocity • Channel-F1V.txt Channel Calculator Given Input Data: Shape solving for Flowrate Slope Manning's n Height Bottom width Left slope Right slope Computed Results: Depth Velocity Full Flowrate Flow area Flow perimeter Hydraulic radius Top width Area Perimeter Percent full Critical Information critical depth Critical slope Critical velocity Critical area Critical perimeter Critical hydraulic radius Critical top width Specific energy Minimum energy Froude number Flow condition Trapezoidal Depth of Flow 10.20 cfs 0.081 ft/ft 0.020 24.00 in 0.00 in 0.330 ft/ft (v/H) 0.330 ft/ft (v/H) 7.26 in 9.2 4 47.64 cfs 1.11 ft2 46.31 in 3.45 in 43.98 in 12.12 ft2 153.17 in 30.24 % 11.19 in 0.008 ft/ft 3.87 fps 2.63 ft2 71.40 in 5.31 in 67.80 in 1.92 ft 1.40 ft 2.95 Supercritical Page 1 FLo,,a 5 Pty" J /t% CNANot/E-G S Cd "T"141-5 SLvPt . GRASS rvtiyJc 2 C,i{ NNELS WATER REPORT • • P.O. Box 1908 1005 Cooper Ave. Glenwood Springs, .co 81602 t .. /`<\ Z414C4NELL4 ann 4s5oCI4TES, INC. ENGINEERING CONSULT4NT5 May 7, 2002 Mr. Mark Bean Garfield County Planning Department 109 Eighth Street, Suite 303 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 RE: Lake Springs Ranch P.U.D. Dear Mark: (970) 945-5700 (970) 945-1253 Fax Attached for your review is our June 28, 2001 report which provides a water supply for 198 units at Lake Springs Ranch. The proposed wells have been drilled and tested as outlined in our report. Table 2A presents the diversion and consumptive use for an additional 22 units for a total of 220 EQR. In Water Court Case W-3571, a maximum of 220 EQRs were provided for in the augmentation plan. (This preliminary plan proposes 210 units.) Well 1110 C was augmented in W-3571 and is part of the current water supply plan. From an accounting standpoint, any EQR in excess of the 198 EQR will be accounted for under W- 3571. Diversion for these EQR will be supplied and accounted for from Well C. Finally, we have also enclosed a copy of the revised Basalt Contract which will allow the pumping of Wells C, D, and E up to 198 EQR without the utilization of decree W-3571. This will allow the sod farm to operate during the initial phase of the development. If you have any questions, please call our office at (970) 945-5700. Very truly yours, Zancanella & Associates, Inc. wtaua, 1:2LAA.cvt 121 le.t Thomas A. Zancanella, P.E. Attachments cc: Mike Berkeley John Schenk • Ron Liston Z:197000's `97407\2002\g arco-re port. wpd • • Estimated Water Requirements 0.00 acres N 0 N 0 1_ tD R 30 E h h h co ("1 r Q O) Ih. N e+Oi • I 2 QLL �j N N N :I) .� N N O N N O t0 h r) h O IA 0 O 0) h N cD h. CO -• 0 0 0 0 "7 c0 0 C0 r) .- O O OI N O 7 0 > v, w co 0 h i0 Z 1 C o) 0 u 94 tI 0 I E o • • ._. '= 0 = O d E E 0 U 0 O C v O 0 Ni' O 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 011 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01I 666666666006 OII ^ 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 O O O 0 OI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OII 666666666666 OII 0 0 0 N CO 0 r0 r) N ID 0 O 0 0 0 'T L0 O) LO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 6 6 ri r') 6 0 NU CD31 _ ==., D.:00000000000 eT!' O 6. o 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OII .0 �' O6 O1, c O O • —•O O U • ") 0 0 0 0 CO cD to '' 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V ro 45 y0 A 7. O..i" O ) n. 01 :1 c 1a _o .E......6, a, EIS �. di" � 11 � . 4 0 =, E E CI O 0 _ -T :h O 'T ^ - O ^ pi. a!v 0 0 U 0 0 0 3 n T O O co N O 0 OS 1 1, 3 0 O ND O h o -T - 0 0 7, . yl M Q, 0 = 0 U O O Dh h- c0 cD h m 1. O V 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 co �• 2.. O 0^. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U r? 0 T,..7= N- v O N CO • N N O ▪ N CO N EO t00 :h co 71 O 0 O r7 M O 71 0 ^) 0 h 0' - - -. h h h h h h .` -) Q) 0) 'A 1 ri :h 9 S 7 10 'O (D Q 9 O) O O CD N M r) Q) CO :D O 1.0 (0 c0 0 an N • 0 r (0 01 N.: tD h h rf to IA N r .n h h 0)1, Q 0' OI N 0 0 0 0 0 0 Oli O 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 _. O 0 0 O L. O O O O O O O O O 0 O O O 1 • O 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O ... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O. O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 O1 r) N 1 5d 1 a1 low T a 0 0 a s >._ ? a .o 01 2�'a d0 00 0 al - LL to 2 a Zancanella & Assoc. 974U7Egnise2000.123 P.O. Box 1908 1005 Cooper Ave. Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 1 • ZANCANELLA AND 4SSOC1ATES, INC. ENCINEEPINC CONSULTANTS June 28, 2001 Mr. Mark Bean Garfield County Planning 109 Eighth Street Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Re: Lake Springs Ranch P.U.D. - Water Supply Investigations Dear Mark: (970) 945-5700 (970) 945-1253 Fax This report presents the findings of the water supply investigations performed by Zancanella and Associates, Inc. for the proposed Lake Springs Ranch Subdivision. Information contained in this report covers estimated future domestic water uses, the Basalt Water Conservancy District Contract. The existing water augmentation plan W357' a Neil pump test report, and water duality information. Water Requirements The following table presents the estimated uses for the subdivision: Table 1 Lake Springs Ranch Subdivision Future Water Uses 196 Single Family Lots 1.0 196 Total 196 VVe have assumed that each EQR will represent 0.5 people using 100 gallons of water per person per day. Water will be diverted to irrigate up to 2500 square feet cf awn at eac, residence. Table 2. attached, presents the diversions and consumptive use for the proposed Lake Springs Ranch Subdivision. In Table 2 we used 198 units or EORs _v provide some additional flexibility. Based on the above assumptions. the peak diversion month \Nould occur in Junewith demand of 13.9 acre-feet or 104.1 gallons per minute. The annual diversion requirement is 107.97 acre-feet. The estimated annual water consumption requirement s 25.13 acre- • feet, with 3.88 acre-feet attributable to 'in house' uses and 21.25 acre-feet from irngaticr. The instantaneous peak demand for the entire 198 EQR could be met by the Well alone. however, in order to provide the required fire protection flows and mechanical system redundancy, an additional supply will be necessary. A well for mechanical bacK up purposes (Well E) will be constructed. In addition, Lake Springs Ranch has been usinc Well C to serve the sod farm. Well C can be available for domestic use within the PUD. Well C will continue to be used for sod farming purposes until the sod farm is discontinued. An onsite storage tank will be provided to supply peak domestic and fire flow demands. Sizing of storage facilities and details of the associated distribution pipelines will be provided by High Country Engineering, Inc. The storage tank has been sized at 400,000 gallons. Legal Supply As mentioned above, and as can be seen from Table 2, the subdivision will divert an average of 107.97 AF annually, and consumptively use 25.13 AF. The peak month of June would require a continuous average diversion of 104.8 gpm for the domestic system. The subdivision is located within area A of the Basalt Water Conservancy District and will be eligible for the Basalt District temporary exchange plan approved by Garfield County and the Colorado Division of Water Resources. Copies of signed Basalt Contracts and pertinent decrees are attached. Lake Springs Ranch has a well permit for Well C and compieted water court decrees for both Well C and Well D. Well permits for Wells D and E are pending. Physical Supply The physical suppiy of domestic water is proposed to be provided by two wells, Weil C and Weil D (existing). The following paragraphs discuss the various testing programs that have been undertaken. IDZancanella and Associates, Inc. has conducted groundwater investigations to determine the resources available for the proposed Lake Springs Ranch Subdivision, located in the Spring Valley area south east of Glenwood Springs. We have reviewed the Samuelson Pump Company's recent pump test on Lake Springs Ranch 'Nell D. The well is currently registered as a monitoring hcie with Division of `Nater=escurces under permit No. MH - 25625 and is located in the SE1/4 of the SE1/4 cf Section 33. Township 6 South. Range 88 West of the 6th P.M. The decreed location is given as 650 feet from the South sec^en line and 150 feet from the East section line. The approximate :ccation of the well is shown on the attached site map (Figure 1). Lake Springs Ranch Well D is approximately 273 feet deep. The static water level in :he well on June 26, 1997 was 181 feet and on August 2. 2000 was 183 feet below the tcc of the well casing. The available drawcown in Lake Springs Ranch Well #1 is approximately 92 feet (181 ft - 273 ft). The well was tested August 2, 2000 through August 3, 2000 by Samuelson Pum Company. A 5 horsepower pump powered by an electro generator was installed for :he test. A pumping rate of 90 gallons per minute (gpm i was selected and the well .was pumped continuously for a 25 hour period at the rate of 90 g.p.m. Drawdown and time data was collected during the test and is presentec in the attached Table 3. The drawdown data can be used to project the yield of a yell and associated aquifer. The • drawdown is the distance the water level drops from the initial static water level and can vary over time, depending on the pumping intensity. We have plotted the pump test data in a drawdcwn vs. time curve for Well D. The graph is shown on the attached Figure 2. The well drawdown was approximateiy 6 inches aver • • the entire 25 hour test. The water level while pumping at 90 gpm stayed well above the pump intake level of 240 ft during the pumping test. Based on the available drawdown the well should be able :o pump continuously in excess of 100 days at a rate of 90 to 110 gpm. Recovery data for the well was collected after the pumping had stopped. The well recovered to its initial static water level within a few minutes of cessation pumping. The recovery data is presented in Table 3. The recovery plotted as residual drawdcwn is shown in Figure 4. Based on the residual drawdown curve, the well dispiayed positive recharge characteristics, or in other words the well recovered at a rate faster than the rate at which it was pumped. During periods of low recharge (like a 1977 dry year), irrigation from the well at the proposed development might require curtailment if seasonal recharge volumes are low. We recommend that a second well (Well E) be constructed to provide mechanical reliability to the system. However, Wells C and D are adequate to serve the needs of the entire subdivision. Finally, water samples of the pumping discharge were taken from Lake Springs Ranch Weil D on June 26. 1997 and sent :o Barringer Laboratories for an independent water quality analysis. The Colorado Department of Pubiic Health and Environment (CDPHE) requires that the water be tested for Semi Volatile Organic Chemicals SOC'S), Volatile Organic Chemicals (VOC'S) and Inorganic Chemicals (ICC's) as well as radioactive particles, a total cf 190 separate tests in ail. We have only summarized those parameters which were above the detectable limit. Listed below are the concentrations found in the samples and the maximum concentrations permitted by the CDPHE. Lake Springs Ranch Weil #1 CDPHE limits Barium 0.17 mgiL 2.0 mgiL Cadmium 0.003 mgiL 0.005 mg/L Suifate 6.0 mgiL 500.0 mgiL Sodium 6.0 mg/L 20.0 mg/L * Nitrate/Nitrite 1.2 mg/L 10.0 mg/L Alkalinity 198.0 mgiL no official limit Total Dissolved Solids 238.0 mg/L 500.3 mg/L * Total Solids 258.0 mgiL 500.30 mgiL Ca as CaCO3 162.0 mgiL no official limit Langelier Saturation Index .07 units .00 units suggested maximum levels All of the tests passed the CDPHE maximum contaminant levels. For the complete analysis, see CDPHE summary reporting form Appendix B. • • A sample was also taken and tested for gross alpha and gross beta. The Lake Springs Well #1 has passed the tests for Radioactive materials according to the requirements of the CDPHE Drinking Water Section and are summarized as follows: Gross Alpha Gross Beta Lake Springs Ranch Well #1 7.5 pCi/I (± 2.6) 5.5 pCi/I (± 2.6) CDPHE Limits 15 oCi/I if>10 test R226&U 50 pCi/l Finally, Well C has been used for sod farm irrigation. Testing of the well was conducted by Wright Water Engineers in 1981. A copy of the testing report is attached as Appendix C. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact our office at (970) 945-5700. Very truly yours, Zancaneila and Associates, Inc. Thomas A. Zancaneila, P.E. Attachments cc: Michael and Maci Berkeley Ron Liston \Serverz & a joos197000's197407\2001\garcoreot.wod • R88W 111• i 1 , - 28 '?/5Z) J J ,, -2. i,G7 l�I i{� r''Welisj 3 f ell <Of • -• Well Z ,. 17' __i r -�.. 7r26-. J 7 467,- i . • 'i .. 7";.\.. r ------__\.„:1-2/,, •)', \--/ =rte • 10 � •,-...,..::..--777,03-6..:./.1:t...,..._•-•`--...: i -- .te ' •'.; � 1�_` l/r'_• 1I�'j.ao10 \,.;.; T � r�_% � 1-✓�/i — _ _ S—�• • f � ') y —_moi_- -�e in Feet PROJECT LOCATION MAF SCALE DATE: = 2000' I MAY 31. 2001 DRAWN 3Y: ICHKD 3Y: ecP I eco APPO 9Y: TAZ SHEET: 1 OF DRAWING: WE1L—LOC2dvg LAKE SPRINGS RANCH ZANC4N/7I A AND AS;SOCYA J /NC c7/C/NEF?/NC CCNSUL TANTS MST vrti Sat 'sa - !m OXIa AVOLE MORI= :1waa CCIauoo Mat VCO 144- 6103 FIG..RE NC. ?4C. c 9 4-C7 • Estimated Water Requirements • 0.00 acres z= m c'5 = 0 e c m! rl C h 0) 5 co 5 0_ yy > J Wl t0 Zr) 3 Z Cn A Z7 a 0. Q X CrCr y Q w a a o W Cl) o Q a: O In o a 0 o h• N C'1 O ? O O 91 In N r- z: M 6Z 5 A O E 3' U _ C .- W �i c c ^ O n. 0) `ry cc) . 2 * at :t CL — Q :. m E Q' 0 3. 5 5 cu A g 7.1 a a • u. co V .7 7 0 N .-- - `! r 171 ?? b N N N In N N 9 xi Nh N N w Ch 7 N N 3? el O el 0 e- CO O 16.• .- O! N of el O 0 PI M C'1 ,t b N d' 0 O r7 el r 1.. !' 0 0 0 0 )O CO C"f r'.; N a, 0O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .00 0 N C 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 O 0 O 0 0 aD w 2 0 0 0 : o 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 8 8 3 8 8 3 0 8 8 0 8 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O R a N C m a O s- 0 0 Coinrnerclal o U 01 15 D N V 23 :4 OS m _ O 6 v 880(0 13 0)(°00 O O O O 'Q ' Q M N O O O O O O j 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O! O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 J 0 i�f = = 'D r CO O O 'D (D C0 CD ID CD tD 1 m O J n N n ., N ."? .. C") c7 C~7 ('7 O 0)1 p t 0 0 0 ..0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C� 0 a = E O. 63 F- co O co N O,_ O O R CD c0 - r0 • .17 .12. .0 0 0 b h D ? Q N O "7 a0 N CO O N CO 0 0 0 0 O N IO CO 0 0 co D CI cD b CD '.O fV r R co CD ml ID c0I co 11 f• i 0 1 �1 J 1 .L�' I 0 0 0 C c 0 C 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 IV 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 O > a W 000=00000000 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 O 3 0 0 0 0 0 O 1 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 G 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 O I ro•0 0 0— :'I N a? c0 0 0 Cmf , 0 J 0 0 0 0 O n 1 c0 0 0 0 •e0 0 0 0 h\ T c7 .-- O O11 co 11 O = O a � Onco cc Cp O J 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 C h 1 ;a I 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 O 0 0 O 0 O II 0 0 J � = 'n ? (0 .0 'n n .0 Irl ^ (0 Irl Irl 0 a- Ci n 8 n y o n n i c3 o c1l INn CO p ^.�. (0(0(0(0'(0(000(0(0(0(0 1 C D O .0 0 z Ducwnbur 31 <1 0 O c. 1 Table 3 Pump Test Data Well ID: Lake Spnngs Ranch Well D , Dr. Burkley Job No.: 17407 Client: Lake Sonng Rancn Test By: Samuelson Analysis By: BCP M.P. = Q = 90 gpm r = ft S.W.L. = 183.0 ft b = ft Time/ Date on: F . 00 4:25 ?`4 Time/ Date off: 3,3,00 5:30 ?fit projected Test Length: 2.5:05:00 total time REAL TIME Time (minutes) Log (Time) W.L Measurement Drawdown (feet) 1 1 Q (gpm) t' (minutes) tit' (feet) (inches) 8/2100 4:25 PM 0 183.00 i) SWL 1 90 8/100 4:26 PM 1 0.00 183.24 0 0.24 I 90 3/200 4:27 PM 2 0.30 183.52 0 0.52 30 3/2'00 4:23 ?M 3 0.48 133.80 0 0.80 I a0 3/2004:31 PM 6 0.73 183.30 0 0.30 90 3/2'004:33 PM 8 0.90 184.33 0 1.33 I 90 3/'00 4:36 PM 11 1.04 183.21 0 0.2: 00 3/2/00 4:45 PM 20 1.30 183.23 0 0.23 ( 40 3/100 4:56 PM 31 1.49 183.13 0 0 : 3 ! 90 3/2100 5:13 PM 53 1.72 183.20 0 0.20 1 90 8/2100 5:26 PM 61 1.79 183.31 0 0.31 I 90 8/2/00 5:55 PM 90 1.95 183.25 0 0.25 90 3/100 6:25 PM 120 2.08 183.22 1 0.22 00 3/2100 11:29 PM 424 2.53 183.40 0 0.10 030 3/300 6:55 AM 370 2.94 183.35 0 ).35 .00 3/3/00 5:30 PM 1505 3.18 133.35 1 035 :oo Pumome 3/3/00 5:31 PM 1506 3. i3 183.00 0 ) .1 3 .5,�6i 3/3/00 5:32 ?M 1507 3.':3 183.00 3 >.Ji0 3 -. 541 3/3/00 5:35 PM 1510 3.18 183.00 3 3.L0 0 302! 3/100 5:36 PM 1511 3.18 133.00 ) H' -O ) D' -52! 8/3/00 5:38 PM 1513 3.18 182.95 0 -9.95 9 31 .891 8/300 5:41 ?M 1516 3.18 182.38 0 2 3 .381 3/3/005:45 PM 1520 3.18 182.34 0 -•3.:6 ) :5i :011 8/3/005:51 ?M 1526 3.13 182.38 0 1 _. _31 3/3/00 6:00 PM 1535 3.19 182.93 •1 - 1 1 301 511 5123101 Zancan t(a & Assocates. !tic. We LA npTest.x s • • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r 1 1 1 1 T 90 JI)i thnai(Jhcnit fust • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ▪ .- ^1 C7 ▪ CD • N ) T SCJ CD I` CO C) C V :7 ? to D N. r- -— V :V 7V N N N Cl N (i;) 'anal iale;kik • 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0= 0 0 0 0 0^ o :_ ^ 0 0^ 0 0 •-• N C7 Lc) CD CO 0 r N :'7 v CD ao O — ^ ^J :^ v '.17 :D r r r r— r N CV CV N CV N N (lanai Duels woJA Taal) uMopMeJQ WellDPumpTest.xls 2ancanelle 3 ASouciales, Inc • • • APPENDIX '`A" Water Rights Basalt Contract Water Court Decrees - W3571 and 95CW079A Well Permit - Well C • 1 1 1 Contract Number. Contract Date: A. Water User. Berkeley Family Limited Partnership 3961 CR 114 Glenwood Springs CC 81601 B. Quantity of Water. 66.00 Acre Feet per annum C. Maximum Daily Demand: 1.000 Cubic Feet Per Second D. Legal Source cf Water. 1. Approved, District Substitute Supply Plan E. Source(s) of Augmentation/Replacement: Ruedi Reservoir F. Type of Use: Domestic, 95 Single Famiiy Homes G. Distract Area: A H. Monthly Diversion Schedule (Acre Feet): Month: Total Diversion January 3.32 February 3.00 March 3.32 April 3.69 May 3.46 June 9.92 July 9.60 August 7.31 September 6.62 Cctober 4.17 November 3.21 December 3.32 Annual Total 35.96 Weil Permit Numbers: 25/ 3.3.5.292 4/14/1997 Consumptive Use 0.50 0.45 0.50 3.36 4.;41 5.35 5.52 9 3.21 1.18 0.48 0.50 27.35 ..... ESDUHGE ■UR. E N G I N E E R I N G I N C. • 1 Mr. Tom Zancanella, P.E. Zancanella and Associates PO Box 1908 Glenwood Springs CO 81602 RE: Lake Springs Ranch (Berkeley) - BWCD Contract No. 292 Dear Tom: June 7, 2001 Berkeley Family Limited Partnership hold the subject water service contract in the amount of 1 .0 cfs (450 gpm) and 66 AF for Lake Springs Ranch P.U.D. It covers Lake Springs Wells A - D and Lake Springs Ranch Spring. It is aur understanding that current development plans call for 198 residential units with 2,500 SF of irrigation per unit. The proposed development has an estimated annual consumptive use of oniy 25.13 AF. This is less than the 66 AF contract amount. Your letter of June 1, 2001 requests an amendment to contract 292 which will apply 27 AF (25.13 AF - 5% transit loss) for :he 1 98 unit PUD and the remaining 39 AF for irrigation at the sod farm. The monthly cistribution of :he 66 AF contract ',vas inc:uded in your letter. A fifth well, Lake Spring Well E, is to ce developed as a supplemental water source. The instantaneous diversion rate at ail wells will not axceed 450 gpm. As you know this contract falls within the area for which the State Engineer's Office has temporarily placed a moratorium cn new Area A contracts. However we believe that this contract can continued to be acministered under the Substitute `;Vater Supply Plan as a pre-existing contract even f amended. The one exception -nay ce the addition of the new Weil c. We 'Noma take :he position that because :here s no proposed increase in the rate of diversion nor n the annual depletions, We will present the proposed amendment to the BWCD Board for approval at :he next scheduled meeting. Sincereiv. RESGAPrffC1 ENGINEERING, INC. /j S. Bussone, P.E. Water Resources Engineer PSB/mmm • 033-7.0 :z :92 3mencment.033.Noc 3.3.5.292 Consulting Engineers and Hydrologists SCS Colorado Avenue ■ Glenwood Springs, CO 81 501 ■ C97C] Cas -0777 ■ Fax :970194.E-1" 37 • BASALT WATER CONSERVANCY DISTRICT WATER ALLOTMENT CONMACT NO. 292 Pursuant to C.R.S. 1973, 37-45-131 Berkeley Family Limited Partnership, a Colorado Limited Partnership (hereinafter "Applicant") has applied to the Basalt Water Conservancy District (hereinafter the 'District"), a political subdivision of the State of Colorado, organized pursuant to and existing by virtue of Colorado Revised Statutes, 1973, 37-45-101, et sec., for an allotment Contac: for beneficial use of water rights owned, leased, or hereafter accuired by the District. By execution of this Contract. Applicant agrees to the following terms and conditions: 1. QUANTITY: In consideration of the covenants and conditions herein contained. Applicant shall be entitled to receive and apply :o beneficial use 1.0 cubic feet of water per second from the District's direct flow rights and bo acre feet per year of storage water owned or controlled by the District. SOURCE OF ALLOT : ED WATER: Water rights allotted pursuant to this Contract shall be from the District's water rights . ecreed :o the Basalt Conduit. Landis Canal, Stockman's Ditch Extension. or other decrees or .nater rights hereafter acquired by the District. including the District's contrac.uai right to receive storage water from Ruedi Reservoir. The District shall '.ave the right to designate the water -:_ht or Decree of the District from which :he Applicant's allotted rights shall be obtained. The Applicant's use of any of the District's :eater rights shall be subject to any and all terms and conditions imposed by :he Water Curt on :he use of :he District's said rights. Exchange releases made from the District's storage rights in Ruedi Reservoir or other works and facilities of the District shall be delivered :o the Applicant at the outlet works of said storage facility and release of water at such outlet works shall constitute full performance of :he District's delivery obligation. Delivery of water from the District's storage rights in Ruedi Reservoir shall be sublet: to the District's lease Contract with the United States Bureau of Reclamation and any rules and regulations promulgated pursuant :hereto. PURPOSE AND LOCATION OF ":SE: .Applicant •.viil use :he •.va:ers herein granted for beneficial purposes limited :o the augmentation of e fisting and future %veils and other water sources. within or through facilities or ::on lands owned. �peratec. or served by Applicant. which lands are described .on Exhibit attached hereto: provided :hat the location and purpose of Applicant's use of said water shall be legaily recognized and 'e:-^ "-ea by the applicable zovenmental authority having jurisdiction over :he property served_ -_ppiicant's contemplated usage for the water allotted hereunder is for :he foilow:ng use :r uses: X Domestic; Municipal Industrial/Commercial Agrcuir?rai Other Note: Domestic use for 95 -knit PT -D =crisistma of single 717liiV '-fomes with 5.000 sauare feet -)f 'awn and garden irrigation her 'roti Appiicant acknowledges that usage of :he District's water rights as herein conternpiated shall be in lieu of or suppiernental to Applicant obtaining or adjudicating, on ::s own. the dght 1 1 • • to use certain waters. It is acknowledged that certain locations within the District may not be susceptible to service solely by the District's water rights allotted hereunder or the District's said water rights may not satisfy Applicant's needs and purposes. To the extent that service cannot be achieved by use of the District's allotted water rights, or in the event said service is inadequate, Applicant may, utiiize such other water rights, by way of supplementing the District's water rights. or otherwise. as is necessary :2 assure water service sufficiently reliable for Applicant's intended purpose or purposes. All :ands, facilities and areas served by water rights allotted hereunder shall be situated within the boundaries of :he District. The District reserves the exclusive right to review and approve any conditions which may be attached to judicial approval of Applicant's use of the District's water rights allotted hereunder. Applicant agrees to defray any out-of-pocket expenses incurred by :he District in connection with he allot - trent of water rights hereunder, including, but not limited to, reimbursement of legal and engineering costs incurred in connection with any water rights adjudication necessary to- allow Applicant's use of such allotted water rights: provided. however, in the event any such adjudication involves more of :he District's water rights than are allotted pursuant to this Contract. Appiicant shall bear only a pro -rata por icn of such expenses. Applicant shall be solely responsible for providing works and facilities. if any. necessary :o utiiize the District's water rights allotted hereunder for Applicant's beneficial use. Water service provided by :he District shah be limited to :he amount of water available :n priority at the original point of diversion of :he District's anriicabie water right and neither the District., nor these entitled to utilize the District's decrees. may call on any greater amount at new or alternate points of diversion. The District :hail request the Colorado Mate engineer :0 estimate any conveyance losses between :he original point and any alternate :oint and such estimate shall be deducted from :his :mount in each case. The District. or anyone using the District's decrees. :nay call on any additional sources of supply that :nay be available at an alternate point of diversion. but not at the :raginai point sf diversion. only as against water rights which are junior to the date of application for the aite.mate point of diversion. In the event :he Applicant intends to develop an augmentation pian and instirite legai proceedings for the approval oI such augmentation clan :0 allow :he Applicant to 'ataize :he .eater allotted :o Acpiicant hereunder.:he Acpiicant shail give the District written notice of such intent. In the event :he Applicant develops and adjudicates an augmentation pian to Itiiize the water allotted hereunder, Applicant shall not be obligated :o bear or defray any 'legal or engineering expense of the District incurred by :he District for the purpose of developing and adjudicating a plan of augmentation for the District. in any event. the Distract shall have the right t0 approve :he Applicant's augmentation plan and the Applicant shall provide .::e District copies of such. pian and of all pleadings aid other capers :lied with :he Water Court in the adjudication hereof. ?ANENT: Applicant shall pay a:n: ily for :he water sersice described herein n at a price to 3e fixed annually by :he Board or Directors of the District for such service. ?avment of the annual fee shall be :Wade. in full. within f_fteen (if.) days after the date of a notice from :he District that the payment is due. Said notice will advise :he ADpiicar.t. among other things. of the water delivery year to which :he payment shail appiy and the or_ce which is applicable :o that year. If a payment is pct :rade by the due date, written notice hereof will • • • be sent by the District to the Applicant at Applicant's address set forth below. If payment is not made within thirty (30) days after said written notice, the District may, at its option. elect to terminate all of the Applicant's right, title, or interest under this Contract, in which event the water right allotted hereunder may be transferred, leased or otherwise disposed of by the District at the discretion of its Board of Directors. In the event water deliveries hereunder are made by or pursuant to agreement with some other Gerson, corporation, quasi -municipal entity, or governmental entity, and in the event the Applicant fails co make payments as required hereunder, the Distric: may, at its sole option and request. authorize said person or entity to curtail the Applicant's water service pursuant to this Contract. and in such event neither the District nor such persons or entity shall be liable for such curtailment. . APPROnIATION OF FT?NDS: The Applicant agrees that so long as this Contract is vaiid and in force, Applicant will budget and appropriate from such sources of revenues as may be legally available to the Applicant the funds necessary to make the annual payments in advance of water delivery pursuant to this Contract. The Appiicant will hold harmless the District and any person or entity involved in the delivery of water pursuant to this Contract, for discontinuance in service due to the failure of Applicant to maintain the payments herein required on a current basis. 6. BENEFIT OF CONTRACT: The water right allotted hereunder shall be beneficially used for the purposes and in the manner specified herein and :his Contract is for the exclusive benefit of the Applicant and shall not inure to the benefit of any successor. assign. or lessee of said Applicant without the prior written approval of :he Board of Directors of the District. In the event the water right allotted hereunder is to be uses for the benefit of :and which is now or will hereafter be subdivided or otherwise held or owned in separate ownership interest by two (2) or more uses of the water right allotted hereunder. :he Aociic rt :nay assign :he Applicant's rights hereunder only to a homeowners association. water district. water and sanitation district or other special district properly organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of :he State of Colorado and then only if such association er special district establishes to the satisfaction of the Basalt Water Conservancy District :hat it has :he ability and authority to assure its performance of :he Appiicant's obligations under :his Contract. In no event shall the Dwner of a portion, but less than ail, of the Appiicant's procer7 to be served under this Contract. have any rights hereunder. except as such rights may exist ±ough a homeowners association or special district as above provided. Any assignment of the Applicant's rights under this Contract shall be subject :o and _must corripiv with such requirements as the District may hereafter adopt regarding assignment of Contmc: rights. and the assumption of Contract obligations by assignees and successors. provided that such recuirernents shall uniformly apply to all allottees receiving District service. The restrictions on assignment as herein contained shall not preclude :he District from holding :he Applicant.:r any successor to the Applicant, responsible for the performance of all or any par of :he Aoeiic :nt's covenants and agreements herein contained. 3 7. OTHER RULES: Applicant's rights under this Contract shall be subject to the Water Service Plan as adopted by the District and amended from : me to time; provided that such Water Service Plan shall apply uniformly throughout the District among water users S receiving he same service from the District. Applicant shall also be bound by the provisions of the Water Conservancy Act of the State of Colorado, the Ruies and Regulations of the Board of Directors of the District, the plumbing advisory, water conservation. and staged curtailment regulations. if any, applicable within the County in which the water allotted 'hereunder is to be used, together with all amendments of and supplements to any of the foregoing. 8. CL-RTAI L MEN T OF USE: The water seriice provided hereurder is expressly subject to the provisions of that certain Stipulation in Case No. 80 CW 253 on tile in the District Court in Water Division 5 of :he State of Colorado. which Stipulation provides. in part. for the possible curtailment of out -of -house municipal and domestic water demands upon the occurrence of certain events and upon the District giving notice of such curtailment, all as :Wore fully se: forth in said Stipulation. 9. OPERATION ION AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT: Applicant shall enter into an "Operation and Maintenance Agreement' with the District if and when the Board. of Directors rinds and Determines that such an agreement is required by reason of additional or special services recuested by the Applicant and provided by the District or by -eason of :he delivery or use of water by the Applicant for :more than one of the classes of service which are defined in the Ruies and Regulations of :he Board of Directors of said Disz_ac:. Said agreement may contain. but not be limited to. prevision for water delivery at times or by :nears not provided within the terms of standard allotment contracts of :he District and additional annual ncnetar• • consideration for extension of Distract services and for additional administration. operation and maintenance costs. or for other costs to the District which :may arise through services made available to :he applicant. 10. CHANGE OF SE: The District reserves :he exclusive right :c re•..eW and approve or disapprove any proposed change in use of :he water right allotted hereunder. An use other than that set forth herein or anv lease or sale of :hewater or '.vate- rights allotted hereunder without the prior written approval of :he District shall be tieerr.ed :o be a material breach of :is Contract. 11. PRIOR RESOLUTION: The water service provided hereunder is expresses. subject :o :hat certain Resolution passed by the Board of Directors of :he District an September 25. 1979. and ail amendments :hereto. as :he same exists upon :he nate of :his anpiicat:cn ar.d allotment Contract. __. NO FEE TITLE: it is understood and agreed :hat nothing here:n shall z:ire .e Applicant anv equitable or legal fee title interest or ownership in or :o any of the water or water rights of the District, but that Applicant is entitled to the right to ase the water right ailocted hereunder, subject to the limitations. obligations and conditions of :his Contract. • 13. CCNSERVAT_ON ?RAC T ICES: applicant than irrpiement and use commonly accepted conservation practices with respect to the water and water rights allotted hereunder ar.d • • shall be bound by any conservation plan hereafter adopted by the District, as the same may be amended from time to time. • 14. WELL SPACING REOUIREMENTS: Applicant must comply with the well - spacing requirements set forth in C.R.S. §37-90-137, as amended. if applicable. Compliance with said statutory well -spacing criteria shall be an express condition of the extension of service hereunder. and the District shall in no way be liable for an Applicant's failure to comply. 15. RECORDING OF MEMORANDUM: In lieu of recording this Water Allotment Contract. a Memorandum of Water Allotment Contract will be recorded with the Garfield County Cleric and Recorder's Office. The costs of recording the Memorandum shall be paid by Applicant. APPLICANT: Berkeley Family Limited Par nershio Bv`Michael E. Be,. eley, General Parte, Applicant's Address: 3961. County Road 114 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 STATE OF / l /or c O ss. COUNTY O F .14 c Subscribed and sworn to before :ne this. day or 4.7i by Michael E. Berkeley as General Partner of :he Berkeley Family Limited Pa:mersnip. WITNESS my hand and official seal. My commission expires: / - 5- 5 Notary Public • ORDER GRANTING :APPLICATION FOR ALLOTNLENT CON'I'1AC'1' BERKELEY FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP CONTRACT NO. 292 Appiica tion having been made by or on behalf of he Berkeley Family Limited Partnership and hearing on said Application having been duly held. :: is hereby ordered that said Application be granted and that the attached Water allotment Contract for 1.0 cubic feet of water per second from the District's direct flow rights and .:43c acre feet per year of stcr ge water owned or controlled by to District is hereby approved and executed by and on behalf of the Basalt Water Conservancy District. for the beneficial use of 7.1:e :eater allotted in the attached Contract. upon the terms, conditions and i arner of pavfnent as therein specified and subject to the following specific conditions: 1. The Applicant has acknowledged that :he land to be benefitted by the attached Contract is described in Exhibit A. attached hereto and ince^orated herein by reference. Applicant intends to develop the propery into a PUD with 95 single-family homes. The veils through which diversion of the allotted water will be made were constricted ander Well Permit Nos. 24099-F. 24101-F, 038393-F, and MH25625, as issued by the Colorado Division of Water Resources and :he Applicant has applied for new well permits for such wells. An additienai water supply diversion point for :he allotted water will be he L:.ke Scr.ngs Ranch Spring. By executing this Contract and accepting the benefits thereof. the A:plica-- agrees that all charges and fees assessed under this Contract are its obligation. :he A:piica:a acknowledges for itself and for its successors in interest that the allotment of water under this Cor.=ct is expressly conditioned upcn :he full and timely :erfcm-..ance of all �biigat:ons of phis Contract. ?. :n the event of -the division of :he property Served by :his Cor. c: into three ,: or more parcels owned by different persons. the Applicant shall establish a Homeowners Association other entity accept tabic to the Disuic: for :he or_going oavttient of charges due under the approved Contract following subii..-:sion -of the :rope:--.• described :n the Application. ior_ on file with the District and .he Apciicant shall give nonce to :'arc: asers of ail or any par-_ of the subject:rcner?: of the obligation of this Contract. and shall record such notice in the records of the Cierc and Recorder ofmart eid County, Colorado. Ac^iicar.: and his successors and assigns snail comply with all -ales and .eT iations now existi .g or hereafter adopted by the District to enforce payment of zharges due'ander the approved Contra:: by :resent and future owners of al: br any part of the real proper served ander :his Contra... 3. The Applicant frail provide the District :roof that the proposed land se of :he 1enef .e.. : .oral hereunder - dapplicable land :o be _ .. ::t d by the water ailett has beenap:.cve �by the appi:c..,, governmental authorities having jurisdic::cr. :ver such land use. including 2vidence 3atiSraC:Cry to the District :hat each lot cr :arce. :o be :enetitted hereunder :s ieoa. y subdivided. 4. By acceptance :f :his Contract. Applicant acl:no.viedges :hat vithin :.vo years of the date hereof or such later date as he District may approve. the Ar.::cant shall :::e with :e Water Cour: of Water Division No. 5 a water rights pian of augmentation for utilization of water allotted hereunder at the location and for the purposes hereinabove se: forth or the Applicant's water allotment as provided :n this Contact shall be included in a water rights pian: of ,,LS,..R,,. ......:. 311) -1- • • • augmentation to be filed by the District with the expenses thereof to be shared prorata by the Contract holders included in such plan; provided that inclusion of the Applicant's water allotment in the District's plan of augmentation shall be at the District's sole discretion. The District may establish an augmentation plan fee to be paid by the holder of any Contract to be included within a plan of augmentation to be filed by the District, which fee shall be payable in advance of the inclusion of such Contract in a District plan of augmentation and may be based on the District's good faith estimate of the anticipated expense of such plan of augmentation. If such augmentation pian fee paid by a Contract holder exceeds the Contract holder's prorata portion or the actual expenses incurred by the District in completing said plan of augmentation, the District shall refund such excess to the Contract holder. . Any and all conditions imposed upon the release and diversion of water allotted hereunder in any water rights plan of augmentation or other water rights decree of the Water Court for Water Division No. 5 shall be incorporated herein as a condition of approval of this contract. Granting of this allotment contract does not constitute the District's representation that the Applicant will receive a -well permit or water rights decree for the land to be benefitted hereby. 6. If Applicant intends to divert water through a well or wells. Applicant shall provide the District a copy of Applicant's valid well permit for each such well before the District is obligated to deliver water for the benefit of Applicant hereunder. r.:piicant must comply with the weil-spacing requirements set forth in C.R.S. §37-90-137, as amended. if applicable. Comniiance with said statutory well -spacing criteria shall be an=xpress condition of the extension of service hereunder, and the District shall in no way be liable for an Apciicant's failure to comply. Attest: By: 4G, Approved :his y day of - . 1997. • Barbara Mick - Secretary BASALT WATER CONSERVANCY DISTR?CT By: 1 ice' C i vt_ _-- • • • N-3571, ;'-3572, W-3573, N-3574, W-3997 8. The •,e' - :as nct been c,.mp etas and the water has not been applied to beneficial ase. - 9. _he later from t..is well will be used in the central water supmly system for the Lake Springs Ranch Development. _e Referee does therefore conclude that the above _..titled application should be granted and that ,..44 cubic foot of water per second of time with appropriation date of December 19, is hereby awarded conditionally to Lake Springs Ranch Well irrigation, municipal, domestic, fire __.Lection, andlivestock water purposes, provided always that said 0.44 cubic foot .,f water per second of time in on the condition. =hat said vuanti=v of water be applied to - beneficial use within a reasonable time; subject, however, to _-- ear -ter priority rights of others and to t_._ n _egr- --- -..d tabulation or the Division Zn cineer such priorities and :..arses of rights in accordance with taw. and further subject _- the condizi.cns or aproval ' ..f the permit as set forth in paragr'a7 : . above. anplicat_.,n for a quadrennial finding of reasonable diligence shall be =_-ed in March o: 1985 and in "arch of ever' fourth calendar year thereafter so Iona as claimant desires :o maintain _.-s tonci:..anal water riot.: or un ___ a determination has been Wade :net this :onditional Nater rigzt has become an absolute ::are: right by reason of the completion of the appropriation. W-3571 Thisapolioation is _.. apnlicat_on for cnange of water right and for approval of plan for augmentation _ . The statements _.. the amended ammlination are true. . The name and address of the applicant .s Foster -.,rperat_.,_; 2. Sox 698; Carbondale, Colorado. 2. The leplinant has been awarded Lr. this Consolidated Case, conditional water rights to lake Springs aancn Spring, t^ ., Lr_;ce Spr . gs Rancn 'yell A, to lake Springs Ranch. 4e__ ?.. andLake ^.,... Springs Ra=all C, at the locations, and the quan__t-es as previously set 'ort.. '.:ere_... 4. The applicant is also the owner of thefollowing water rights: • • • Sri -3571, W-3572, w-3573, w-3574, :;-3997 Name of Ditch Amount Priority Nc. Van Cleve Nc. 1 _.z 45 Van Cleve Nc. : 0.9 46 Van Cleve No. 3, 2.4"rst =nlargement 2.0 121 5. (a. The point of d_versi.,n of the Tan Cleve No. 1 Ditch, as decreed, is Located on the South side of a sjipri.-ic_ i.. Section 33, T. 6 S., R. 38 W. of the 6th P.X. (b The point of diversion of the Van ".'_eve No. 2 :_-ch .s Located on the Southeast hang of the outflow of 3 spring in Section 33, T. 6 S., R. 82 W. o the 6th P.M. The actual location is m. the SWC;$?. of Section 23. T. 6 R. 33 W. of the 5th ?.Y_ at a point whence _.e Southeast Corner of said Section 33 bears S. 34o0C' 2. ,500 feet. - 6. The purpose of the plan for augmentation is to provide an adequate and dependable supply of water ±Or the Lake Springs Ranch Development, a proposed Planned -t Development. 7. Statements of Opposition were timely filed by ^-ado Mountain Junior College .,_strict, and -y Jn.cx O. Company ..f Colorado, and an Entry of Appearance was filed by los Amigos Ranch ?a_ triers;.- . As a result the application was re-referred the water Referee t.. the Water Judge for ;late_ Division No. 5. 3. Sticulations and agreements have been filed by the Aopi;can_ and the Objectors which :onta_._ the following =acts and protect_ .-e _-_.__tions to orevent injury to the Ob j ear sor other owners or users of decreed water rights. A. The water rights previously awarded to the Van Cleve :1o. 1 the Var. _Lave No. _ Ditch and the Van Cleve .._t,,.,, First .'nlargement have been used historically ___ -tion or. 12., acres of lend, resu.zenc 72 acre feet historical c..nsummpt--:e use. /N 3. p7l-„ant 3 proxosed development .s for d maximum __ :20 single-family residential ac;. :aient .:nits, w_t:m maximum total irrigated area of 7.6 acres. The develop- ment w evelr-mem -_: ut:.l-:3 central water and sewer systems. and the =seated effluent frcm the =entrai sewer system will be discharged into the Cattle __eek drainage. The estimated total annual consumptive use by the proposed subdivision is "1.7 acre feet of water, which will be tem_ total annual depletion to the Roaring Fork River. . _ e '.,__owing orotective conditions will prevent injury t. O. Oi Company of California's water rights:: plan for augmentation herein shall cover deblet_cns b:r A^^' ''nzs'S __oPOsed development not exceeding _2C s _. _a-fammily residential -a i ent ._.its with to tai ----''tea lawn and other area not exceeding 7.6 acres. (2.The consumptive .:.se by Applicant's proposed development _t _-_1 development shat- not exceed 72 acre feet annually, and the resulting depletions to the Rear_xc Fork Fiver at :__l development shall not exceed -2 acre feet annually. Axv consumptive •se and depletions to the RoaringFork k River _n excess of 72 acre feet annually shah hot be severed by the plan for augmentation :herein and diversions Cy Applicant's water rights shall be adetailed by the water administration o' -' a' s of theState as necessary raven;, such depletions or -consumptive use in excess -a- • • • w-3571, w-3572, W-3573, W-3574, W-3997 of acre feet annually. (3`^_he est -'gated total, anneal wafer =aceirenen a of applicants _,oposed develo=Hent at f..__ development, an- the resulting estimated annus: depletions are as follows: Depletions Declet_cns Total t.. Spring es Roaren g Requirements vaelev 3 :k River Domestic 7.0 units) 36.2 Ieregatior. 7.6 acres) 19.0 TOTAL 36.2 105.2 37.6 60.., _1.4 (4)The changes of water eights and clan for auementat_ .. ?:OpOsed herein shall not he effective untie all :ands revi ous1v 4 --'-aced by the '.rater _-gats decreed ee van Cleve NO. 1 Die, :, Van Cleve NO. 2 Ditch, Van Cleve No. 2 etch, First Enlargement, and the other water __grits that are the subject of the consol-c. _ed app11ca=_,^,ns _.. etes _ase have been eer-ianent_-• __moves from errecateen. _.-t_- tee Decree herein approve_c said saanges o' nater _ernes and plan for augmentation becomes effective. none _f sal_ eater _-chts shat_ be ,sed =.._ irrigation, except for the maximum 7.6 acres to be ----gated «__.._.. .:evelenment. (5)The wells and springs describes -n the consceedated applications herein and to be '_sed te supply Applicant's development shall be equipped we-: zotalizenc _low meters and all water dever_ed throuce -ee•t shall be measured and recorded. All sewage eeflue^.: discharged free. the centra: sewer system serving =.pp__can: s _eveiopmene shall ce measured by means of • -•-c _..cw meteres' and recor•°ed. The records of such water and sewage effluent measueerrenes Shall be maintained by Apelecant and conies ---Hewed _e _neon upon request. (6;en accordance wet. C.R.S. 37-92-304(6), as emended, :'^e eecree tc be entered herein.sea:: remaen sue - t tere- epening for reconsideration of tae guestion __ injury to tee vested water rights of others for a perecd of eme ze be specefeed by tee Court. -_ y .... _ ___t and -.Tee= heren -gree that such Decree may be_ eotened by 'I-_.,., e'er reconsideration of the questecn of injury _„ its water reghts within =•ao (1) years -_ _..._ tee date _.. '.rhi_.e weee servece _s =urn -shed ee _..o ........red '300) s:-e-fa.v resedenteai ecus valent _nets wi _ en Anne Lca::' s develee- mene, and applicant has _ even wr' =ten^, notice ee `.::e Ceur- and to tee part -es tees eeeceedeng that s_,,.. eve-: V as oce-urred. Provided, that of the _final eeaeCs) approved ry Garfield Ceunt'r for Ape" -=r -'s develoemen: ail maximum number oe s:. ,le-f+Z^ily residential 'g'uivalent unets that is less than 2=0, nen =.e two .2 -vear peried snail run from the date on wheee water serve__ -s =--___shed eo ninety percent (9 C e) of suet enees and Ar: :as _even the Court and Un' -on 'err• --o: no=-ce of :..at. ?receded further, that _f tae _curt seecif_es a longer period o_ time for reopening or of npeecan t stipulates with any other pasty to a longer period of time, then inion shall be entitled to reopen ::.e Decree within such longer -period of time. • W-3571, w-3572, w-3573, w-3574, 'Y -399- D. :he protective conditions set =orth in paragraph 3-C above will also prevent in'•u-= to the water rights owned by Colorado Mountain ,, Junior :_lege District (C`".C) . Addition, the yap_ -cant and =1C agree that. (l):Oster may by ,_stale of this plan of augmentation consumptively use an amount ecual to the averace annual historic consumptive use of roster's-r_igation water rights, namely 72 acre feet ter year, under the priorities granted to the irrigation water- _ hts of Foster. To the extent that the priorities of the irrigation water rights are used under this augmentation plan, for a'__ purposes Foster shall permanently cease using water for irrigation purposes except for the -.o acres to be ____gated within the development. The withdrawal and consu.:.^t_ve use of said 72 acre feet her annum shall be deemed under the priority dates granted to roster's irrigation water rights and shall be deemed prior to the priori-_ dates of CMC's underc_ourd water rights. (2)Foster may divert and use rater .n excess of 72 acre feet per year under the p_:^ -'-.es granted to Foster's underground water rights as set forth herein above, which are ju'. to :`C' underground water _-.;"ts.' The withdrawal _::d =op1.cation of any water tobeams=' - _ ,•se by _ cs-er _.. excess of the historic consu.^tpt-re use of -:V acre feet shall be subject t„ call by 2:".0 an accordance with he priority system of water lights. (3)2oster and CNC agree to constantly monitor the :rater level and diversions of their respective wells and under- ground water rights, at each tart -J's own expense, and to ma_..ta_t written recordsthereof or. at _east a monthly_ basis. Such monitoring Shall occur by the installation ..f tot-' • - n c =low meters or _t:.er appropriate measurinc devices on t. -e wells and spring within one year from the date o: the execution. hereof. =_:e cartes turther stall cooperate toward the orderly development and administration of the Spr__ c Valley acu-fer cv providing one another the right of reasonable inspection of said records upon written request o: either part_ hereto. (;)_f as a proximate result of roster's diversions in excess o= 72 of per annum aro- the Spring 7allev aquifer, CNC is unable to .'.take __versions frum its wells es permitted by _ wells as permitted by its aforesaid decrees in the amounts sur ' -' int :or its needs, as those :eels may exist from time to time, CNC snail be deemed injured as a result of suc . ihablility and Voste_ shall immediately, upon the occ.._ence of every a::c^ _: sol--_-, undertake remedial measures that will alleviate the �injury to CMC. 9. The 31ar for Aucmentatior, as set contemplated by law and if implemented and accordance with this Decree, will cause no rested water rights or decreed conditional The Referee forth herein is one ad.:i..istrered in injurious effect t.. water rights. does therefore conclude that the above entitled application for approval of plan for Augmentation should be approved insofar as it is _ontist3nt :Jet.., the protective tcnd_ticns as set forth in oarag:dpi: 3 above, and with :he Plan for Augmentation as set forth above. • • • W-3571, n-3572, W-3573, %:-3574, W-3997 The amp _cant will ___rain from diversions and oonsu_:.ttive use of the water treviously awarded to the .an Cleve No. _ Ditch, the van ..leve No. 2 Ditch, and Van Cleve No. 2 Ditch, First Enlargement, and will use the Lake Strings Zn.... String, The Lake Strings Ranch Well A, the Lake Springs Ranch Well 3, and the Lake Strings Zane: Well 0 to supply the water requirements o= the Lake Springs Ranch Development. :t is accordingly OR0EPED that this ruling stall be filed with the Water Clerk and shall become effective upon such filing, subject to judicial review pursuant to Section 37-92-304 C.R.S. 1972. :t is = r -ter .._.DER:.. that _ i-cp __ _=-- - _-- s al_ be riled with t:.V. a _ _ _sat_ Di._s_._. �_ ..cell -nd t.._ Sia e _ -_nee: . `.One et the C__y of llenwood Springs, Colorado, this 7c '' day o: AAA 2 C ,J , 1981. 3Y THE E77.2ZE . _ _s:.,.. No. Stat_ Y Colorado No protest was filet' in this matter, and accordingly the foregoing ruling is confirmed and approved, and is made the .:udgement and Decree of this court provided however, that the approval of this Plan for Augmentation shall he subject to re- considerati.,n by the ;,later Judge on the -uest...on of injury -o _ ne vested rignts cf other= dur_nc ary hearing co ^n enc_nc in the Dale.^.da: _Years su--mm," ng _.e year in wt..._. this decision is rendered. - zated 4-0 / / C%-/ Tatar • DISTRICT COURT, WATER DIVISION 5, COLORADO Case No. 9 5CW 079 a FTh D1 GS OF FACT AND DECREE OF COL =T IN CCNI 81144E0 CQ,j r CCLNTy, CO MAR 25_1 09 CONCERNING =E. APPLICATION -FOR WATERR'Cr :; S OF .N/EC E 3ERL' - GARFTELD CONT. Michael E. Berkeley :�iec an apaiica rrec : err -� e t<on for :.o l ., ..cn of c.�..cai or, :,, �a:�.. a conditional water rQrt absolute, and for an underground water accordance with C.R.S. §37-92-203(7) (West 1990), the Water Judge referred the subject ccilcation to the Water Referee for Water Division No. 5, State. of Colorado. The Cour: las .wade su1ch investigations as are necessarY to dete_^nine :?ether or not the statements :.z e Application are :rue and :lag become fully advised with i esDec to : e subject =.er of the Acciicaren. 'ne Cour..: recd .hakes :he faiiowin_ Find; -?s and Decree :n this _atter: I DIGS The statements in the Application are :rue. _. Michael E. Berkeley is the .anniican nert.n. None of:hesubiec wa ;Q� S Or'.. 3cu Ces are :ocated wit'aiL• a desi -ed "aundwater basis Titre:; and adequate. actice cf-.he �. � cc, . d b _ of -^' S � .,:1caLion was 2.i. -/en .-S . _ct..re.. v law. No statements of opcosizon 7gere the -.=e for _ •. 5Z1cn occCsit:on 'Las expirec. Chan ^- ':Vater7 � it. _DDllCaCt ?'^S a aasze descri:,ed more 7,ar.lculariv asv5oiicw;: - - �yc_eoc :alis C: it:uC ire .vmcz:_:$ JCL'c^t.• 3. =rcn crevtcus decree: Date of Or.2irai Decree: June 19S Case Nod: ',v-_99, (Consolidated wit -.N ., w-35 ;_. '•V -3s-': and .Y _ 4) Court: Distr:c: Coin L, Water Division No.` Water :ivision No. Case No. 95CW79A Findings cf =_c: and Dreg of Caul.: Michael =. Beri;eiev Pr-ze C. Decreed coin: of diversion:. •oCated :.. the V W i/4 SW1/= cf Se ACL' 33, T. 5 S., R- 38 W . of the nth P.M. at a point whence tae SE Corner of said Sec. :2 bears S 71°00' E. 4,700 feet. D. Source: Weil having a depth of 2.00 feet and being Tbutary :o Spring Valley, tributary. to the Roaring Fork River. Appropriation. Date: December :9, :973 Amouht: 0:-5 cfs, conditionai E. Use: .Irrigation, municipal, domestic, are protection and livestock water purposes. Proposed change: TheLake ({e S ornas R. -inch Weil^ C is add:a l y located in me tiE /- SW1/4 of Sec,ion 33, T. 5 S.. R. 33 W. of to SthP.M. :.330 feet from the. JOLT: line and 1,520 feet from :he 7v -est Line and has depth 9_ feet. a V V a.. �.'1 . C,a;rt 'or Underground Water Right. Applicant ciRirZR an undermcuzd water rizr, described more oardcuiariy as follows: .? Name of well and permit. regs-tratiorL cr denial number: Like Scr nQs R; noir We; D, application denied. Fide No,.. -\...D -12r 1. 3. Legal description of wei:: Located in the i $3� . Se' don , _ o risiii South. Rang" 88 West, 5th P.M., 550 Leet from :he South line and :50 feet the Fiast line. C. Source: Aquifer, ibuta y to S cr ng `%:lige,gut: r-% :c Roan c- D. Depth: 280 feet E. Date of appropriation: :Line .:.:995 CW appropriation was ini.L'aied: or:ipieticn of '.veli. C. Date water ac:iied :o A150 mount Claimed: `pm. ;cadit crai. • I. Proposed use: w Water Division No. 5 Case No. 95Cw79A Findings of Fact and Decree of Cour. Nfie;sael E. Berkeley 3.2e (1) 3 (1) I irrigation: a Number of acres historic-4liv ir:iaated: NIA b. Total number of acres proposed to be irrigated: 80 (2) Le.gai description oEland irrigated: Land located in W..Sri., Section owns in 6 South, Range 38 West, 6th P.M. a. Area of lawns and gardens :irrigated: N1A Ii non -irrigation. describe purposeHilly: Water will be used for domesdc, livestock watering, -yunicival and :Ire J1otec.o .. Remarks: Lake Springs Ra► ch�,v ell ; ll be used in :ohiun rion :Y •W 3asa : Water Corser'Jancv C. nt:'acz. RLLF'G The Court has examined the information submir d by the Applicant and has became advised with : esoec :o the subjectmatter of the Appiica ion. The Court rules as follows: 3. The foregoing=findings of:"act are Lily : ccremted .ere= ne ci�ims for water rights apposed by the _-_coiicant 172 such as are conte^piated by law. 10. 1-: adW:niste ..re .:.n acc;,rda: ce vinthdecree, -tee � ngo �. �Q�- ;�sc.:be^ herein In:.ss .. . _ _. dila., cf wat_. _ _ _.. .... will of adversely affect :de owners or user of Jested water riQhts or decreed ccrdi. ...icnai water :i?hts. Tue :."range oI water g'': Ze( Derv. Way be:a': iiv oec'eed The Bader grcurla water right and cane of waterHereina:e approved and decreed. 13 .in consideration of :he specific frdirgs and conclusions =wade herein and in conformance with Colo. Rev. Scat. §37-32-304(5) (' 990), as a. -ended, the aoarovai of the change cf •water ngnt decreed herein snail be subject to reconsideration '3y the Water judge on the question • • Ware; Division No. 5 Cass No. 95C' 79A Findings of Fact and Deoree of Court .tific:.aei E. 3erkeiev ?aQC 4 of injury to the Testes water :iQits of others for oerioc or 5 calendar year(s). .f no petition for reconsideration is Sled within 5 caiendar year(s), retention ofjurisdiction for this purpose shall automatically expire. Lake Springs Ranch Wes D is hereby decreed conditional for 150 gpm. :5. The conditionai water : aht referenced herein shall sot be made absolute an±i use of the 3asait Water Dist:7c: water in coorciination with the well has been decrees in a Dasait Water District or other au�entation Plan. W c. An Application for a finding of reasonable diligeace shall be flied in uA?C'? OO5 and in `ARCS of everv-sixth calendar r - hereafter. so ion, as the Applicant or its successor in interest .besires to maintain the conditional uses of the conditional -Nater -ants described above or until a determination has been made that these ccnci::enai ::gnt.s have become absolute by reason of ccmnietion or the acoroDriar+ons. IT IS ACCORDINGLY ORDERED that a copy o; this Decree shall be :led 7+-t:1 the State mm�eer and the Division Eaa:neer for Water Division No. 5. Dated: Ls7.zNs t: 3' ._._ Cci. T: /• /^ ''-Water ud^P GWS -25 COLORADO DIVISION Or WMI mrc Rc�v�r��.t_� 313 Centennial Bldg.. 1313 Sherman Oenver. Colorado 80203 (303)866-3581 _!CANT 1095 'NELL PERMIT NUMBER - F CIV. -5 'NC 38 CES. BASIN MC 3ERKE' EY ;FAMILY L!MITc . PARTNERSHIP :961 COUNTY ROAD 111 : •LENWCCO SPRINGS. 00 31601- !dE+-r- -++ AFCRCVEC 'NELL LOCA70N 0- F:EL:: ZOUN I 1 NE 1/'1 SW 1/4 Sector, 33 T ownsnio : S Range 88 •N Six:n P.M. DIS7.2.NCES =RCM SEC -'CN L`.NES 1380 Fr_ tom South Section Lane 1520 Ff. -,e,;, Fast Section _ane 9701 915-120 'NELLNcrrin UT',.1 '�CC=C'INA T g:=3siOC: PERMIT TO USE .AN EXISTING _ ISSUA''10E -1S PERMIT CCES NCT CONFER , . »A T ER RIGHT' CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 'airs '.vett snail ce useo in suet a wan as :o cause no matenat irnurI :o existing water mgnts. 7.7e ssuance er this :ermit Ices not assure me 9oauc3nt :^at 110 intury will occur :o arctr.er vested water ngnt or :reCuae another owner cr a 'iestea water rent 'r^m seeking reties in a evil .curt ac::cn. - �C� .02.., :mess accrovat cr a vana11ce r.as -re constr:e:en or this well snail Ca in ccmouar.ca',van :re 'Vater Neil Construct= Rules _ 1 _een granter ev the State aoarc or Examiners =. '.'later 'fell Const.-uc:icn ana PUmo .nstaItaacn ,:ontractors in acccraance with Pure S. �rn case no. _1C.VCC5 or .rte Lake Sonr.^s Ranch vett A -•I as an >ocrovea c_ruant :a CRS 37-:0-�..- _, ana :re :ecee ;rantea :re altemate ccint or civersion to the dasau :1-3997 :,;,nscticateC wart c•-xsuant to CRS 37 -?0-137'_: ana :r.e cecrees grantee :cr :ne Laxe Scnngs Pani'.: fell C ;n case ncs. 5 -5 .1073, ani ?5CW079A, 3ivrston 5 Water Court. sr the ccnattion :hat ^is weft s coeratee ':v-357' '.v-3Sr 3. 'N-3570. ana N-3 i s}. _ C' 5-. ,. r^ :v-3573. and 1N -3574W ane ':V-3997. ' f this naccaraance with :he augmentation c:an acercveC in :r.e P nsauaateal�eses uo ec::o aaminls� such :n�uaing orcer5 to cease ervernh^ water. • .veil s not acerates i11 aceoroance with ,ie terms or sato c_cees.. ^�^ o u ~ 5) -he use or orcuna water 'rom :iris weft s ',imlted :o a water suoaty 'cr the Lxe Sanngs Rant. ceveicorent 3 ^ngle-rani' eslc 11ttatI anc II equivalent , its ana 7.3 acres cr lawn ana other moatec area as stlec:r:ea n canscucatea cases 571. 'N-357 _. 'N-3572. ono N-1997). :he trncaucn or a :CO acre corner: or a -5'3 acre mac:.as scec:^ea :n ,se no. :1005. :re cumarnq rate or :his .Ven 311311 7,c,t exceec 200 Gr"•1. -re _ averse= annual amount cr y'rcuno nater :7 :e accrc_natea small not exceea ICC c e -gees. rerrannea laver amt or croannua11 water J rat ,-1 `- nav ce a.,.....onatea cv :me L.:xe Scnngs :Rarer. :Veil .- snail nct exceea 00 ac --•-et anc Ire grater :a e 'v ttnarawn ov this well anc :re Lake Scnngs Ranch 'Neils A arc 3 aucwec av ccnscucatec eases N-3397. 'N -257'•,V -3572 .v--,5773. a, .. N-3574. ana case ncs. :SC: J073. ana 95 :' f079A. snail net exceea 250 acre-:eet.; v ...:s well snail Ce constructea not mere than =30 `eet'rm . ane :ccucn cecreea or :re Lake 5crrgs Pancn 'Veit --.i in case no. : lC05 aria :he Lose Sonnq Pancn Weil C . icase no.:5C.V079A. ?, ",:s well construc:ea at :east 500 `set r -cm anv existing well tr.at s not cwnea r+ :r.e aocucant. a ;:V meter 'must ce :nstaliee cn Iris weir ana .maintalnea in gaca'alanine Frier. �9irlanent reccres : all c:vers:ens .must 7e '-,c.tilneC -.;trtatnsa o�+ me well owner tr2ccrCea ,.t !east annua:lvi ana suarntttea :: :,e 3ivIsicn Enc:reer :icon recuest. --re owner :nail mane :re well :n a ccnsolcucus :lace wan well cermet numoerlsi. name cr :re acuuer. ana ecus. :=se nur.nerlsi 35 ,ccr:ate. -re owner snail :axe necessar+ -eans ar.c :recauucns :a :reserve :r.ese marstns. ^s cerrr:t -as ceen accrovea cr :re .ises :cac:tiea _cnatticr =5 occve. as acec:^eo '-e •ererenceo ecus :_ses.'o i : e "ereo+- r' - is eerrm:t. cY .line a wnt:en-ecues: vim ..iris office:`ntr., 5lxty ' ..ays ;nee that -cu nave ;^e ngnt :o accost 'r,e �ssuancs c::. mistraave . ,ceaures Ac: See ^n _ _ 0- Co. ,.�.S.; ;/Q;Q%�; .7Issua11ca.:urcuant :o ane State AC.. f I AFcRCVE3 , J-,� 1K -N State Engineer LRec'etot No. '370803 0A77-1 ISSUED FE 20T5v_XFIRA7C,l :AT= J C�'OL • • APPENDIX "B" Laboratory Test Results • • BARRINGER LABORATORIES, INC ;5000 W. 6TH AVE., SUITE 300 GOLDEN, CO 60401 (303) Z77-1687 FAX 303) 277-1689 Colorado Department of Health - Drinking Water Section REPORTING FORM FOR PHASE I,IT_,V ORGANIC ANALYSES SAMPLER: PLEA=' FILL CUT ONE FCRM - FOR EACH INDIVI:.tAL SOURCE/PLANT or COMPOSITE SET YES [X] or NO 1 THESE RESULTS ARE TO BE 7SED TO FULFILL STATE SAMPLING REQUIREMENTS PWS=O 7: COUNTY: Ga, -4'.='d DATE COLLECTED: 06/26/97 SYSTEM/ESTABLISHMENT NAME: Lake Sccs. Ranc!. c!o 'ancanelle&Ass.Inc. SYSTEM ADDRESS: 1005 Cooter Ave Glenwood Sccs. Co 31601 Street address/PO Sox C:T'-' STATZ Z:2 CONTACT PERSON: Terri Lance 3ECNE:(9701 945-5700 SAMPLE COLLECTED 3Y: Tel ---L Lance TIME COLLECTED : 3 : 0 0cm WATER SOURCE(S): RAW or C_:LOR=NAT_: L 1 or OTHER TREATMENT 1 LOCATi0N(S): - address SAMPLE POINT(S): Scc Ua;lev Rd Well Head Lake Sccs _ranch Well 410 DO SAMPLES NEED TO BE COMPOSITED BY LABORATORY? YES [ 1 or NO [ IC yes, record i nfor nation for second source or second PWS ID# SCURCE(S): LOCATION(S): - address SAMPLE POINT(S): LABORATORY SAMPLE 7 '? 7265 - CI_ENT :`TAlME or :".2# LABCRATORY NAME SARR=LAGER - aECRATCROES . :NC. -_AB -HONE ."30.3' ✓ TE REcE- 'N I BCRATORy CCM ENTS : DATE E ANALYZE✓ 06-/0/.97-.7)7/11 / 97 • Meeting The Analytical Challenges Of .A Changing Worid Since i96 PAGE 2 LABORATORY NUMBER C000042 PWSID# • CONTAMINANT BARRINGER LABORATORIES, INC 15000 W. STH AVE.. SUITE 300 GOLDEN. CO 80401 (303) 277-1687 FAX (303) 277-1689 UNREGULATED VOCs (TRIHALOMETHANES): Chloroform 3romodichiorometha:-e Chio rodibromome tha:.e Bromoform (ug/1) CAS# RESULT 67-66-3 3DL 75-27-4 3DL 124-48-1 3DL 75-25-2 3DL (ug/1) EPA (ug/1) BLANX METHOD Lab MEL RESULT 524 0.5 3DL 524.2 0.5 3DL 524. 0.5 EDL 524.2 •0.5 EDL REGI LATED CONTAMINANT 1,1-Dichloroethyi.ene 11,1,1 -Tr -Chloroethane 1, Trichloroethane 1,2,-Dichloroethane 1,2,-Dichloroorcpane ,4-Trichlorobentene Benzene Carbon tetrachloride cis -1, Dichloroet'-_ 1 ene 3ichlorcmethane lbenzene _ochlorobenzene o -Dichlorobenzene Lara -Dichlorobenzene Styrene Tecrac^loroet_:vle^_e To.gene trans- , -Di c hior:e::ylene Trichloroethylene 7_.: r1 chloride - Xylenes (toca1) ORGANIC CHEMICALS --VOCs CAS# (ug/1) (ug/1) RESULT MCI 75-35-4 3DL 71-55-6 3DL 79-00-5 3DL 107-06-2 3DL 79-37-5 3DL 120-32-1 3DL 71-43-2 3DL 56-23-5 3DL 156-59-2 3DL 75-09-2 3DL 100-41-4 EDL 108-90-7 3DL 95-50-1 3DL 106-46-7 3DL 100-42-5 3DL 127-13-4 3DL 108-38-3 3DL 156-50-5 3DL 79-01-6 3DL 75-01-4 3DL 1330-20-7 3DL EP?, METHOD (ug/1) Lab MDL 524.2 0.5 200 524.2 0.5 524.3 0.3 5 524.2 0.5 5 524.2 0.- 70 524.2 0 . 3 5 524.2 0.3 3 524 2 0.3 70 524.2 0 . 3 5 524.2 0.5 700 524.2 0.3 100 524.2 0.3 600 524.2 0.- 75 524.2 0.5 100 524.2 0.3 5 524._ 0.5 1,000 524.2 0.3 :00 524.2 0 . 5 524 2 0.3 - _ _ . - . :0,000 524.2 0.5 (ug/l. BLANK RESULT 3DL 3DL EDL 3DL 3DL 3DL 3DL 3DL 3DL 3DL 3DL 3DL 3DL 3DL 3DL 3DL 3DL 3DL 3DL 3DL 3DL REGULATED CONTAMINANT -D 2,4,5,-7P Alachlor itraZ�: e 3er.zo t.ai ovrere Carbofuran C`,' ordane •at:o11 bromochlorcprcca:_e __ noseb Dicuac ORGAlNIC CHEMICALS - - SCCs CAS# (ug/'-) RESULT 1746-01-6 NT 94-75-7 3DL (ug/1) MCL ,.00003 EPA METHOD 3_3-: 33-72-1 3DL 50 --3 . - 13972-60-3 3DL 523.2 1912-24-9 3DL - 32.2 50-32-3 3DL 0.2 325.2 153-66-2 3DL 40 521.- 57-74-9 3DL 2 5C5 75-99-0 3DL 200 15. 1 96-:.2-3 3DL 0.2 504.: 35-35-7 3DL • 7 513.: 35-00-7 3DL 20 549.:. (ug (ug/1) BLANK Lab `DL RES'C'L=' NT 0.38 3DL 0.13 3DL 0.3 3DL. 0.3 3DL 0.: 3DL _ . 3 BDL 7 3DL 1.0 3DL 0.025 3DL 0.30 3DL 5.0 3DL ,Meeting The Analytical Challenges Of .-1 Chancing World Since 1961 PAGE 3 LABORATORY NUMBER C000042 PWSIDT 1 CONTAMINANT BARRINGER LABORATORIES, INC 15000 W. 6tH AVE., SUITE 300 GOLDEN. CO 80401 (303) 277-1687 FAX (303) 277-1689 REGULATED Di.2-echylhexyl)adipate Di(2-ethylhexy1)pht alate Endothall Endrin Ethylene dibromide Glyphosate Heptachlor Heptachlor epoxide Hexachlorobenzene Hexachlorocyclopentadiene Lindane Methoxychlor Oxamyl Pentachlorophenol Pic'loram Polychlorinated biphenyl' Simaz-ne Toxaphene ORGANIC CHEMICALS--SOCs (CONT.) (ug/1) (ug/1) CAS# RESULT MCL 103-23-1 3DL 117-81-7 BDL 145-73-3 3DL 72-20-8 3DL 106-93-4 3DL 1071-53-6 NT 76-55-8 3DL 1024-57-3 3DL 118-74-1 3DL 77-47-4 3DL 58-89-9 3DL 72-43-5 3DL 23135-22-0 3DL 87-86-5 3DL 1918-02-1 3DL s 1336-36-3 3DL 122-34-9 3DL 3001-35-2 3DL EPA METHOD 400 525.2 6 525.2 (ug/1) Lab MDL 0.5 0.3 100 548.1' 20 2 505 0.05 504.. 700 0.4 525.3 0.2 505 1 525.3 50 525.2 0.2 525.2 40 505 200 531.1 515._ 500 3.3 505 _ 505 3 505 0.070 0.025 0.2 0.055 0.2 0.1 0.: 0.25 2 . 2 0..0 0.10 0.50 3.3 (ug% 1) BLANK RESULT 3DL 3DL 3DL 3DL 3DL NT 3DL 3DL 3DL 3DL 3DL 3DL 3DL 3DL 3DL 3DL 3DL 3DL UNREGULATED ORGANIC CEEMICALS--SCCs CONTAMINANT 3-3vdroxycarbo=uran aldicarb aldicarb suidone Aldicarb sul_oxide a1.0 in 3ucac hlor Carbaryl 3icamba Dieldrin ;4ethomyl :4ecolacnlOr 4etr_buz in 2rcoachior (ug/1) CAS* RESULT (Unk) 3DL -16-06-3 1646-37-4 16466-37-3 309-00-2 23814-66-9 63-25-2 1989-00-9 60-57-1 16752-77-5 51:_3-45-2 2_087-64-9 1918-16-7 3DL 3DL 3DL 3DL 3DL 3DL 3DL 3DL 3DL 3DL 3DL 3DL EPA METHOD 531. 1 511.1 531.: (ug/1) Lab `WL 53_.1 2.- 505 0.373 0.2 2.� 5_5._ 0.-5 505 0.355 521.1 0.3 525.2 0.2 525._ 0.2 325.2 0.2 (ug/1) BLANK RESULT 3DL 3DL 3DL 3DL 3DL 3DL 3DL 3DL 3DL 3DL 3DL 3DL 3DL UNREGULATED ORGANIC CHEMICALS --VOCs CONTAMINANT --Dichlorcethane 410 Dichlorcpropene ,-Tetrachlorcec :ane 1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane ._,2,3-Trichlcrobenzene 1, 2 , 3 -Tric loropropane (ug/1) CAS+. RESULT 75-34-3 3DL 563-58-6 3DL 530-20-6 3DL 79-34-5 3DL 37-41-6 3DL 96-18-4 3DL (ug/1) EPA (ug/1) BLANK METHOD Lab MDL RESULT 524 0.5 3DL 524.2 0.5 3DL 524._ 0.5 3DL 524.2 0.5 3DL 524.2 0.5 3DL 504.1 0.325 3DL :Veering The Analytical Challenges Of .-1 Changing World Since 1961 PAGE 4 LABOR-kTORY NUMBER C000042 • CONTAMINANT PWS:D# BARRINGER LABORATORIES, INC 15000 W. 5111 AVE.. SUITE 300 GOLDEN. CO 80401 (303) 277-1687 FAX (303) 277-1689 UNREGULATED ORGANIC 1,2,4-Trimechylbenzene 1,3-Dichloropropane :,3-Dichloropropene 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 2,2-Dichloropropane 3romobenzene 3romochloromethare 3romomethane Chlorcethane 2hicrcmechane Dibrcmomethane 2ichicrodifluormethane Fluorocrichioromechane exachiorobutadiene :so>,rcplbenzene -1-Dic iorobenzene Naohtha1 ene z-Butylbenzene n-2rcpylbenzene b-Chiorato1uene •lorotoluene sopropyltoluene Sec-buty1benzene Tera-bucylbenzene CAS CHEMICALS --VOCs (CONT.) (ug/.) RES"Lr EPA METHOD 95-63-6 BDL 524.2 142-28-9 BDL 524.2 542-75-6 BDL 524.2- 108-667-3 BDL 524.2 590-20-7 BDL 524.2 108-86-11 BDL 524.2 74-97-5 BDL 524.2 74-96-4 BDL 524.2 75-00-3 BDL 524.2 74-87-3 BDL 524.2 74-95-3 BDL 524.2 75-71-8 BDL 524.2 75-69-4 BDL 524.2 87-66-3 BDL 524.2 98-32-2 3DL 524.= 541-73-1 3DL 524.: 91-20-3 3CL 324 104-51-3 3DL 524.= 103-65-1 3DL 95-49-3 BDL ^a - 106-43-4 3DL 524.2 25155-15-1 BDL 524.2 135-98-3 3DL 524.2 98-06-6 BDL 524.2 (ug/1) Lab MDL (ug/1) BLANK RESULT 0.5 3DL 0.5 BDL 0.5 3DL 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 BDL BDL 3DL 3DL BDL 3DL 3DL 0.3 BDL BDL 0.3 3DL 0.5 0.5 2.5 7.5 BDL 3DL 3DL 3DL 3DL 3DL 0.5 3DL 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 3DL 3DL 3DL 3DL Codes Used: NT = 3 = 3DL Lab Not 'Tasted for Comcound The analyte is found in the associated blank as = :ndicates that the compound was analyzed for, `ADL = Labcratcr-7 Met hod Dec_ect_o._ Lit :nd_caces the :.resence of a =bound that meets but the result is Less t nan the same and treater than the Lab MDL. Above the Lab MDL buz below the r-QL. W iewed Y Accrov'd Jby we:: as in the sample but was below the Lab MDL. t e 1Ger-t_ication a--tat_on __.;1_t ar_ "AI RESULTS 70, =oioraeo 0eoarc:nenc Dc :{ealch, -3QC-0 -32, -:00 -:terry _reex 3cuc-. 3env.-_, _J 30I2_ i :ace 330 Meering The Analytical Challenges OfA Changing World Since :961 • BARRINGER LABORATORIES, INC 15000 W. 6TH AVE., SUITE 300 GOLDEN, CO 80401 (303) 277-1687 FAX (303) 277-1689 Colorado Department of Health - Drinking Water Section REPORTING FORM FOR RADIOLOGICAL ANALYSES SAMPLER: PLEASE FILL OUT ONE FORM - FOR EACH :ND T DUAL SOURCE/PLANT or COMPOSITE SET YES [X] or NO [ ] THESE RESULTS ARE TO BE USED TO FULFILL STATE SAMPLING REQUIREMENTS ?WSID #: COUNTY: Gariel SYSTEM/ESTABLISHMENT NAME: Lake Socs. Ranch c/o Zar_canelie&Ass.Inc. SYSTEM ADDRESS: 1005 Cooper Ave 3lenwccd Sncs. Co 81601 Street address/PO Sox :-- STATE ZIP CONTACT PERSON: Terri Lance PHCNE:(9701 945-5700 SAMPLE COLLECTED 3Y: Terri Lance TIME COLLECTED:3:00nm WATER TYPE: RAW [X] or CHLORINATED ] cr OTHER TREATMENT [ ] DATE COLLECTED: 06/25/97 SOtJRC^(S) : Lake Socs Ranch 'Jell E. of Spa 7allev Rd LOCATION(S): - address SAMPLE POINT(S): Well Head DO SAMPLES NEED TO BE =POSITED 3Y LABORATORY? YES [ ] or NO [X] LABORATORY SAMPLE m 972553-; -L__NT NAME c- ID# - LABORATORY NAME BARRINGER LA3CR=TORIES. NC. L ?HONE (- 00 777-1'6-.87 DATE RECEI7ED IN LABORATORY 06/27/9" •DATE ANALYZED r')/30/97 -07/2L/97 COMMENTS: ? ARAMATER :;ROSS ALPHA SRCSS BETA TOTAL SOLIDS, me RADIUM 226 RADIUM 228 URANIUM RADON ADJUSTED ALPHA (pCi/L) RESULT 7.5 258 NT NT NT NT NT (pCi/L) MCI EPA (pCi/L) METECD Lab `WL Not Tested fbr Compound 3 = The analyte _s found 1.r. :he Assoc aced blank as +ei.. as :he ;ample :;/A = !lot ADDL .Caoie /L = 1.11:grams per Liter Cil _ ?:cocur_es per :!CL = 'Aax:.mum Contaminant .evei :an AUL :.aDorator/ Method .3etect:on :lmic '-CL _or Radtum 226 and :28 22:7HINED Ls : cCi; .. '".CL _r. ::e process of oeinq :hanged by EPA •� _ MC_. :n :he process of bezrq set by EPA -- = cross A1Dna D.nus ranium -,anus Radon equals .;djustea Alone • A 11701-\1 ;viewed & Approved by SAIL RESULTS TO:=olorado Department sc Health, ''QC0-0W-32, T4 - 7 ; z7 /11 Dace :300 Cherry Creek South. Denver, CO 30222-:530 Meeting The Analytical Challenges OfA Changing World Since 1961 -12 • APPENDIX "C" Wright Water Engineers Report • • • • • • • ... • ," _ - Well Construction and Completion Report for the Spings Ranch Development Productron Well - •-r• • •- • -•••• •-• t , • • ' • '.•-!-• -_,,•• • . . , - • - • • ••••• • • - • - A• • - •" _ •• 7: ,• • ----.1%."•.',7?1,.1-:.,7NLITPZ-7;-:;'-*- • .7- • - - ...!•••••NI.M... 4. i =,.., A II.- • fr..::..! j. - .... - ..- %%71. NIMPiago,„ 1...,.= V11.1" .1.1b-Vib. Mr - .',.:....e.:"''.:. -'.-.N. -.-7;i7Wat tlikrS 5.1 '° *ep,,••,,i P../ / 11,40; . . 404.; ar.I COO' h- • .,-;.- 4.... • A • • • • ._ '- . _ J' .' I I/ . P _ -....:11froiltl; ,ciir d ;JT• --,--'—.....A...-7 ...,..... • , . . , . ... • :. -,0, • ...a:4 ..., . ;J:t'P/41:7(!ri:r,, ..."....101.4.- I, . • .4..0 if.....- ...., . - r4•". :. -.7 t' -. - - - • :F 14,_, , • ,,„! • - • .... ,.. ..... , , • ...- )41*-: .•,..1 — .. .„,,,, yor'111.1........./ ........c1 \ 1'.(1fi:7'' " (r).-4rt-trrl.".1 1 179V37'. .---:1Wf. .i. . • !. ''-'.. . . .:" " ... e r•r.... •• • ..,- .. 7 .:..,....1... .., ..„ ,:. ;. .. "((,..,...., 5.-,I ,;.- . -4- _ _ 5. .(‘ , 4.b 11 , ,--:.-4--' 1- - 1-077-41r:::127-- '1:: '..1.:17:..4' .t.'?... -1‘.....:„.3... • , , • ......, ..., (tut rp( (.1,11/i jYr.tjt! i i (fillh — At : 400.1. .•/5- ir, " , , ,,,(J,i'l: •"c -.-'•••,-„,_?.;?7,/(•'- c''',--,"!...:.' .,ifi - ,•ruii,(•,,i:i.1.-,-Fyi,..,---, , --1,p,r •-••• - • , fit .• _ . - .:... , ,..,-.; ,:g -.' ., - • tt I 1 1 --------- it(':(G"-,i -..;.6.--.„-;...7,3..-;,...=.•:,:-.=7"--.. -:•- , -- I," ./ ,'..,.t '..-, "; 'Li .. --' • • • - • • -- . • - - • • • I ' . . J 1 1‘ .1-4... --.z•-,,,,--',-:. _,-,...- G•;.......,-. ' V • -- • i f -\1 \ ' '.. I CI ' OL ESTE STE, WATER WA.G111C4c-:s-----;-----------.--= , ....,_ ..,4..wi.,...ttAt-.4,9(.7.--:it _ _.".:.-:+c•-•. -----:"..7. . - A I c• •••••••.-- -:': '•••••--'• "-- . , '•,' - r t 11--1• Cs...3 --• -s -• • .-.,••• ,. • - . . • , • . • .,_ - ' • . - • • -+.4;‘ - 74.; • , ••• 7 • .••....- . •••••;:.'. . • - - • - . - • • \Nright Water Engineers, Inc. L. ••••-• -A _ • - • -- -,••• -d.r - 7-- %!'";:;"".;, " `7".•• , ' r:C." ['1,'4•iis'?7-• 41.7. - r...4.;""• -•"\.-1•-•A _ ••••-..rr:-A‘ - -1Vcif!!!....• .. • • •.7.7" .• . • "- • - A • -P • r<•••••;...rgi..• ' " ••,t -104 t - *r. „ . „ . . •••!. • • • . 7+1-0a2-- CHEYENNE OFFICE 3130 NENOERSON DRIVE CHEYENNE, WYOMING 82001 GLENW000 SPRINGS OFFICE P.O. BOX 219 GLENW000 SPRINGS. COLORA00 81602 STEAMBOAT OFFICE P.O. BOX 5220 S60AT VILLAGE. COLORADO 80499 • • 2420 ALCOTT STREET DENVER, CCLORAOC 30211 (3031 453.6201 February 19, 1982 Mr. Duncan Sinnock Foster Petroleum Corporation P.O. Bax 698 Carbondale, CO 81623 Re: Lake Springs Ranch Development Well No. 1; SE, SW, T. 6_ S., R. 88 W., Garfield County, Colorado Dear Mr. Sinnock: FRANK 1. TRELEASE LEO M. EISEL MARILYN M. STOKES Attached for your files is a cony of the well construction and completion report for the Lake Springs ranch Well No. 1. The .ve11 is completed in the a1luv'urn of the Spring '/alley and at the time of the completion there was a small arses an flow from the. well . The well was tested for 19 hours at a pumoina rate of 250 gpm, and a nearby observation well eras checked during the test. From the pumping and recovery data we estimate a trans- missivity for the aquifer of about 10,000 gpa/ft. The storage coefficient calculated from the observation well data indicates a storage in the range of .02 to .03 :water table conditions, how- ever, the well is actually under artesian coneitions because it flows. We therefore estimate :he storage coefficient to :e approximately .001. The eater quality data indicates the water is within the limits of :he primary ane seconaary drinking water standards of the EPA and the Colorado Health :epar:m;,ent. ,although we tested Well 1o. 1 at a ounc g rata of 250 gpm, the recommended long-term pumping rate 's 125 to 135 dom. This 'wi l . allow continuous ;pumpinc_ of the we' . for about 100 :ays with the pumping level above the too of the well screen, assaiina that the aQuifer conditions remain similar to these aetermined in our test. • • Mr. Duncan Si nnoc:k February 1982 Page 2 We are prepared to proceed with any additional groundwater explo- ration, planning, or well construction arc development that your program may reauire. Please contact us if you have any ques- tions. ues- tions. CH/TAZ /WHB/WL_ .arc 741-022.00WR Encls. Very truly yours, WRIGHT WATER ENGINEERS, INC. Bq, u urtney r, .7 .7 Groundwater Engineer By nomas A. -LancaneI ia, Groundwater Engineer n,;ilam 1. eti1S Senior Hydrogeologist ri', lath _. Loran, 41ce Rreslcen- ?rinc'oa. Engineer • 1 WELL CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION REPORT FOR THE LAKE SPRINGS RANCH DEVELOPMENT PRODUCTION WELL Prepared for: FOSTER PETROLEUM c:RPORATION ?reared by: WRIGHT 'NATER ENGINEERS, INC. ENGINEERING CONS.L:LTANTS 2420 ALCOTT STREET DENVER, CO 80211 FE3RUARY 1922 4 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS DESCRIPTION PAGE INTRODUCTION 1 Site Location 1 Geologic Setting 1 Surmary or Events 3 WELL CONSTRUCTION 5 PUMPING TEST 7 Procedures 7 Pupping Test Analysis 10 RECOMMENDED OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS 14 WATER QUALITY i4 TABLE NO. _:SI 2F TABLES I Step-Crawdown Data Production Well NO. 1 II Water Quality or the Lake Sprinas Ranch Develccment Water Well FIGURE NC. LIST OF FIGURES Location Mao for Lake Scri nas Ranch Well Ei to . 2 Lake Sorings Ranch 4ei1 Generalized Construction Diagram ane Geologic Loc ? Time -Drawdown Curve for Lake Springs Rancn Well 'lo. a Recovery for Lake Scrinos Rancn Well No. 5 T hire-Crawdown Curve for Observation Well o Recovery for Observation Well 8 17 :1 • INTRODUCTION At the request of Foster Petroleum Corporation specifications were developed for the construction and testing of a test hole and production well. Foster Petroleum negotiated a contract for the specified work with Nor:nwest Drill- ing of Goodland, Kansas. The initial drilling program involved a test hole which provided data far the selection of well screen intervals and the size of screen openings as well as the size distribution of the formation stabi- lizer. Drilling of the initial test hole began May 29, 1981. The initial test hole location, NW, SW, Sec. 33 T. 6 S., R. 38 'W., proved to be an undesirable site due to the fine-grained nature of the aquifer mate- rial. Both the geophysical log and the lithologic log indicate :he aquifer was rather clayey and silty. Because of the concerns that :he iithologic nature at this test hole site might not be suitable for the Peveiocment of a production well, perforated 4 -inch PVC pipe was installed in the 'hole and a short air lift test was performed. This test incicatea very poor 'water yield, in fact the test hole was blown dry during the test. As a result, a field decision was ,made to move to another test hole site. The Next test hole was moved approximately 1,000 feet southeast of the Original test hole. At this new site the sediment characteristics improved and a production well was constructed (Fig. 1) . Site Location The location of the production well is approximately 9.5 miles south, by county roads, of Glenwood Springs, Garfield County, Colorado in :he Sc SW, Section 33, Township 6 South, Range 38 Wes:, 6th P..1., (Fig. 1) . Tne well is in Spring C.€'/alley north of the Colorado Mountain College fampus. The well location is an :he valley slope _lightly above :he lowest iarsiy area of the valley floor. Geologic Setting The production well for Lake Springs Rance Development penetrates the allu- vial deposits in Spring Valley. The valley is cut into the Maroon Formation which crops out along the margins of the valley. Basalt flows are evident along the eastern and western valley margins. These flows slope .o the • south-southeast, however, the Maroon Formation dips to the northwest. The lithology encountered during the drilling is shown on Figure 2. The litho - logy indicates several sand and gravel layers with interbedded clay lenses and zones where the sediment is well cemented. The cemented zones and clay lenses give the aquifer an artesian character. The bedrock unit in this area, the Maroon Formation, is a red even -bedded shale, silts:one, sandstone, and conglomerate sequence. Summary of Events The well construction contract was neget i attic by Foster Petroleum with Northwest Drilling and -was signed in May 1981. Drilling began on May 29, 1981. Initial drilling consisted of a o -inch test hole which was completed to a depth of 280 feet in one day. Drill cuttings were taken throughout the drilling operation and initial exaninat'on of the samples indicated the alluvial sediments contained preccminan:ly blue clay, si it, anc some 'ver'y fine-grainec sands. The hole was logged on May 30, 1981 with a natural Gamma log, a self poten- tial log and a resistivity log. Evacuation of the geophysical logs in con- junction with the sample log suggested :hat :he test hole site had poor potential for the development of a prccuc:icn well. however, :he :rifler ler had already ordered 60 feet of a0 slot .Bar 'ncn) stainless steel .ell screen. Because of :he concerns about a proauc:ion well at this location, =-incn ?VC slotted casing was run into the test hole and a 2 -hour air-lift puma i ng test performed. This test substantiated :he concerns about the location of the well. The eater production was only 8-10 ,p for short periccs of time, anc the hole could be blown dry. A field decision was Mace to drill another _est hole at a different site. Taking into consideration the l itholog is 'nformat ion from the first zest hole and the geologic nature of :he valley, a second rest site was chosen (Fig. 1) . Siltly Soil with Some Sand and Clay Very Fine Sa Sand with I•iard Weil Cerrentea Dyers Sand -Gravel • 1 • -. Gravel with sar ::•• • •• ; Sand :'e•�•...':_�• Sand with some Grave! Sand , Rock Fragments with '-= Q". same Clay L rsess• _1 ..a.. a 1111111111117 0' -Ground Surface Well Slightly Flowing 7-27-81 la Cobbles, Grave: and Sana Basalt Coles • at Base Rea Sandstcre --x Bea Rock —ac Cement 55.5' -10 34" O.D. Steel Casing Wall Thickness 0.3S5'.' Rurroing '' evei at 250 g pm at (7-22-81) After 49 Hours. 35'-12::41' O.G. Stainless Stee: 4C Slot Weil Screen 2'-)03,410.D. Tailpipe With Weldea Base ?late /89.5 T.D. 91.5' FIGURE 2 LAKE SPRINGS RANCH WE_L GENERALZED CONSTRUCTION DIAGRAM AND GEOLOGIC LOG 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i The second test hole was drilled. on June 11, 1981, south of the original location, and was completed to a depth of 115 feet with a diameter of 4 - inches. Samples taken from this hole appeared to be coarser than the 411 samples from the previous site. This test hole was air -lifted and the estimated production was near 200 gpm Since this test hale appeared to be a mucn .more promising water well site, an observation well was constructed approximately 86 feet from the site of the proposed production well. The observation well was completed to a depth of 100 feet and cased with 1 1/4 -inch PVC pipe, slotted from 10 feet to total depth. The drilling of the production well began on June 16, 1981 and was completed to a total depth of 91 1/2 -feet on June 19, 1981. The screen and casing were placed in the hole with an artificial gravel pack. Development of the Q i--inuec through June 198• well was initiated on Duly 25, i_8_ ana _c,.� ,, -• A step -drawdown test to determine a long-term pumping :est flow rate «as conducted on July 28, 1981. The long -ter:, pumping test began :he next day • and continued for 49 hours at a rate of =50 gpm. Recovery data were taken fo i lowing :he pumping test ana the well was disinfected ana caoced wi :n a steel plate. • WE__ CONS7RUCTON The dril inc contractor utilized a reverse -rotary drill rig t: trill :ne production well, ano a bit size or 22 inches. During the drilling of the well, a large cavern formed approximately 3 fee: below ground surface and extended to a depth of approximately 15 to 20 feet_. A 15-i ncn t i ank surface casing was placed in the hole following the setting of casing, screen, and gravel pack ana prior to cementing to prevent the hole from collapsing. Formation samples were collected every 5 tee_ curing the dril;i^c. The lit.ology interpreted from the samples is snown on Figure 2. The for':aticn samples from the aquifer zone •were used t:, :heck the appropriate gravel pack size distribution and well screen slot size, however, both had aiready teen ordered. 1 1 1 1 1 1 • A 35 -foot section of 40 -slot (0.04 inch opening) 10 3/4 -inch 0.0. Houston stainless steel well screen was placed in the production well. Although Wright Water Engineers recommended 30 feet of well screen, the contractor put in 35 feet. It should also be noted that a check of the slot sizes on the Houston well screen indicated that the vast majority of the slots were only 35 -slot, not 40 -slot as marked on the screen. Wright Water Engineers would also like to point out that the gravel pack material was rather coarse and angular, not necessarily a good material for these aquifer condi- tions. The screen was from 54 1/2- to 89 1/2 -feet with a 2 -foot tail pipe attached below the screen. Blank 10 3/4 -inch 0.D. casing extends from 54 1/2 -feet to approximately 1 foot above the ground surface. Following the placement of the screen and blank casing, the annular space between the 10 3/4 -inch well string and 22 -inch hole was partially filled with the gravel pack material. The artificial gravel pack was placed from the bottom of the hole to a depth of approximately 25 feet below the ground surface. Well deveioanent involved the use of a 5 -incl line shaft turoine :est pump. The purip was used to rawnide the well. The well development was terminated after approximately 30 hours of development when the water being pumped from the well :leered up. During development, the water was a very murky red color. Following :he well development, the :est Oumo was use for a stop-arawacwn test. At :he star: of the test ane at chances in :he oumo discharge, :he water 'would turn a cloudy red color 'or a few minutes, indicating the Nei was still being slightly developed curing the test. after the step- draw- down, a continuous puiiping test of 19 hours was conducted. Very 1 ittle sand and red colored material was brought into the well during this test. At the conclusion of the 49 -hour test, the :es: oumo was removed, the well dis- thf _c:ec, anc a steel plate was welded over :he :cc of the 10 2/ .- ncn :as - .ng Neat cement was placed in the annular space between the 10 3/4 -inch anc 16 -inch casing from a depth of approximately 2 feet to 25 feet. Also, =0 bags of cement were mixed and placed outside the 16 -inch casing, in :he large cavern that had developed during drilling. Following the placement of the cement, the cavern was completely backfilled. PUMPING TEST A 5 stage, 6 -inch line shaft turbine pump was set in the well with the in- take set at 80 feet below ground level. A 534 hp Ford propane engine with a right angle gearhead drive was used to drive the pump assembly. The flaw was measured through a 5 -inch discharge pipe with a 4 -inch orifice plate and pitot tube. A11 water level measurements were made with a. Powers Well Sounder and all sand content measurements were made with an Imneff cone. Procedures A step -drawdown test was performed at pupping rates of 200, 250, 275, 300, 350, and 375 gpm (Table 1). Each step was run for approximately 30 minutes, and from these d ai:a it was determined that :he well should be pu^^oed at about 250 gpm for the long-term pumping test. The well was allowed to recover overnight from the step -drawdown :est and the long -terra pumping test was initiated at a constant pumping rate of 250 gpm. At this point, the well was not flowing with the static wa:2r leve: approximately 3 feet below the :op of the well casing. During the test, water levels were monitored in the pumping well and in the cased :oservation well located 86 feet to the southeast of :he production well. The pumping test was terminated after approximately 49 hours when it aopeerec that :he pumping water level was fluctuating around a general staple level of accut 50 feet of drawdown. The sand content of the discharge water from the pumper well was-easurec frecuently during the punning test. Tnrougnout the test, the sane content was minimal with the content never surpassing an estimated 0.5 mc, ' . At :he conc'.usion of the test, the sane content was negligible with a scarcely visible amount of sand found in :he bottom of the mnoff cone. Water samples for quality analysts weretaxen 3 hours into the pumping _est and just prior to turning -off :he test pump. Foiiowinc the a9 -hour test, recovery water levels were taken for approximately 10 nouns. An acditionai recovery reading was taken about 23 hours after the pumping had ceased. r • TABLE 1 STEP -DRAWDOWN DATA PRODUCTION WELL NO. 1 Static Water Level = 3.50 feet below grouna level Stec I t (min) Q = 200 gpm Step 'I Q = 250 gpm Step _II s !ft) 0/s (gpm/ft) 1 5.J0 (adjusting flow) 3 6.95 (murky red Nater) 4 7.50 7.95 6 8.30 7 8.35 8 9.20 9 9.20 10 9.40 2 9.70 14 10.10 -5 10.50 10.50 20 10.94 24 11.50 28 12.30 3U 12..0 16.5 32 14.-0 34 15.10 36 15.50 38 16.30 a0 16.50 S 16.70 50 17.30 17..0 50 13.50 -8- (Rep colorer.: water;' Q = 275 gpm 52 20.50 ;Rec colorec Nater, 54 20.:0 58 21.30 70 21.50 75 22.-10 80 22.20 35 23.30 90 23.70 11.5 { • J 4 Step I Step IV Q = 300 gpm Stem 7 Q = 350 gpm Ste 71 Q = 375 ,. -9- TABLE 1 STEP-DRAWCCWN DATA PRODUCTION 'rrELL NC. 1 (Continued) t (min) s (ft) Ois (gpm/ft) 92 25.00 100 26.70 105 27.30 110 28.00 115 28.90 120 29.60 138 30.10 150 30.70 165 31.30 166 35.77 167 36.50 160 36.35 16. 37.40 170 37.50 17 - 33.00 172 17 39.1177 176 '9.25 180 39.39 185 40.40 190 11.97 195 42.40 210 44.50 (Red colored eater) 9 (Red colored water) 211 a5.91 (Pea .:.. , orc c at.-.'.",' 212 46.50 213 x6.50 214 46.58 216 47.45 216 47.70 220 48.17 225 a9.10 228 49.50 230 49.66 7.5 1 J 1 1 1 Figure a snows the residual -drawdown curve for the prccuc:ion well. l 1 This -I0- Pumping Test Analysis The time -drawdown curve far the 49 -hour pumping test of the production well • is presented on Figure 3. The curve indicates that the drawdown increased with increasing time until approximately 2000 minutes into the test. The drawdown begins to fluctuate about a mean drawdown of 49 to 50 feet. At this paint, the water level is about at the top of the well screen. One problem that may have caused the scatter of drawdown points near the end of the test was the occurrence of oil in the well. By this point in the test a thick layer of lineshaft lubricant had farmed on the surface of the water in the well which made precise measurement of the water level difficult. Because of these 1acturs, it is difficult to state whether or not the pumcing level actually stabilized. It appears that there is a stabilization of the drawdown, however, this is not a certainty. The transnissivity calculated from these time -drawdown data is approximately 9,200 apd/ft. i i 1 i 1 1 i plot suggests that zero drawdown will be reached before the ratio of t/t' becomes unity. - This suggests that there may be some recharge to the aqui- . fer. The transmissivity calculated from the recovery data is about 10,000 • gpd/ft. The time -drawdown curve for the observation well is presented in Ficure 5. These data show drawdown gradually increasing with increasing time until about 2000 minutes of the test. This ncticaole droo correlates with the fluctuations of the measured pumping level in the pumei nc well. This droo in the observation well water level may suggest that the pumping well water level was cropping and was not picked up in the measurements cue tJ :he problem with the oil on the water surface. The construction of the observation well may be a prool em, in that the per- forations extend into the upper zones. These 'upper Nater bearing zones may be perched and ane or several may have been dewatered curing the _est thus causing a drop in the observed water level. At this time, we do not have sufficient data to provide an unquestionable explanation for the measured results. • .. . 7- :• 77 : . : • 7. -- • '^`..�.^.."` 3 • • _ _ • - — - - - - - t _ • _ • . • . • - • • . - • _ - • - • • • - -• • - - • - • • • • t • . a. _ • 1.• • LL.1 — • • - ..0 7.• • - 0.- " ' 7.: 7- :=:7 (I) _ ' t • I ••••••• ..... .e 2,...... -:c. a.: .... . • .,:_, - . _ r•-•• 777 • • . — - : . =17 '777 77' - • ; 7 7 — ••=1, 4 I 2 < < ________••• MEW •m••• - . - u 7 4,s 1.32:1 NI NMOVAV _:1 { 6 4 ---- • 4.0 } MEM — C� D in cr)— J _T I 1 • 1 i - a Y umJ v • i nr+ G 1� NI NMCCMCC 1Vf1CIS��+ 6 3 3 3 - r -- — : r = _ _ : f_—=: _ _ - 1 .. c . - - - - _--: (= ---• .. .._.- .-__ • W Cn • cs c �Z m _ -- - - o - - - -- - cs - ua,- - _ d ---- ----- _ _ f- ---.-•- ---•._-__ - ;. ---- : - c l-1•1 3— — •• ='z m ira alm --• • -- - ',� ' — -- x-3 • . — - •- - . -.- - - - - -- --- -- - — . • • - _ all - _ -• m o __ -_: ----�- _ v------ - 2 : ' ; i t .1.27tzi NI NMOQMV8C cr: Z_ 2 L • We have some reservations about the use of the groundwater data obtained from this well. For instance, we calculated the storage coefficient from the observation well data to be .02 to .03. These values are typical of water table conditions, however, the well flows naturally after full recovery which certainly indicates artesian conditions. Therefore, there is some doubt cast an the reliability of these data. Figure 6 presents the recovery data for the observation well. The residual - drawdown curve shows some fluctuation in the recovery of the well and it appears that from the trend of the points, the ratio of tit' will reach unity before the drawaown reaches zero, indicating a possible impermeable boundary "ad been intercepted and that the aquifer is being dewatered. The reliability of these data, as well as the time-drawaown data, is suspect due to the response of the well during pumping. RECOMMENDED OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS ,An evaluation of the pumping test data for the production well suggests that if :he arawaown slope from about 200 to 2000 minutes is ,maintained with con- tinued pumping, then we would recommend a much lower pumping rate for long- term USE. This is assunina that there is no stabilization of the pimping level. If the development needs about 100 days of ,cntinuous pumping curing a pea.K demand period, then we would probably recommend a punping rate of about 125 to 135 gpm. This rate would probably allow 100 lays of continuous pumping without drawing the pumping level down int;, the well screen. higner pumping rate could be used if we could be assured that the pumcing level reaches stabilization. At this time, we are Jncer-ain about predict- ing any long-term pumping stabi l i zat ion. To oreven= :he water level from dropping pelow the top of the well screen, - ;ow wa:er shut-off snould pe installed so the water level Ni ;l nc: go below a pet= of 52 feet. /I I (AT`? QUrL_IV Two samples of the pumping a schar•ce Nater were taken during the pumping test. One sample was taken 3 hours into the test and another sample was taken just prior to turning off the :est pump, about =.8 hours after the pumping was started. The chemical constituents analyzed and the concentra- , r to �---�1- ? e jja 1 • s9 - -4 _._.--f ---- �.i.J Arl yy -- . 0 NI NMCCIACLC iV(1CISf1 t.1.. O 0 -16 - tions are shown on Table 2. For comparison, primary and secondary drinking water standards of the E?A and the Colorado Health Department are also shown. None of the constitutents exceed the mandatory limits of the primary drinking water standards nor the recommended limits of the secondary drinking water standards. From Table 2 it can be seen that none of the concentrations changed appreciably from the sample taken at the beginning of test to the sample taken after 48 hours of pumping. '4e feel that with extended pumping of the well the concentrations of the chemical constituents will remain relatively stable. However, we recommend :hat periodic tests be initiated to monitor the water quality for future reference. Radionuclides were also analyzed from the production well samples. The gross beta activity in the initial punning water sample was 3.8 pCi/1, and was sligntly '-educed to a value of 5.3 :Ci/1 in the sample taken just prior to turning the pump off. Both water samples contained a gross alpha activity of 14 pCi/1. The maximum contaminant level for gross alpha and gross beta is 15 and 50 pCi/l, respectively. These analyses of the groundwater indicate a very good duality water, adequate for a municipal supply. • e, vy • 0 O all o , 0 0 , T 0 0 0 CI 0 a J, T O O O I I er T O O ,.//1 O N O T I• r'1 I .r I 1 O Jl T v Cr C a 6.0 O • O I 2 j I •O p r a. v T 0 • 0 v v O v • • J', y v T l P J'1 r L C 0 a - > o r =_ Lt9 S� J C w2 a :J Co..... T WI v C •7 O. -L . O a+ J C r y,� E a 0 M .._ ,...7. 'J Ur n L 0. 7 CC U C N. C v 0. .r 7, _ -- Y7 3. - 0 = :J. c L a S rC C7 C a = C L • 2 •L L 07 2 7 C �. G M —.w _ — L al 7 J a 7 _ _ O, C s V C q/11 L L L 7 a L +1 C 7 O C Yar N N _ a a J J — a ma M. • • L y .:. C 3 — • • • AMENDMENT TO WATER ALLOTMENT CONTRACT BASALT WATER CONSERVANCY DISTRICT BERKELEY FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP WHEREAS, the Basalt Water Conservancy District (hereinafter the "District") granted Water Allotment Contract No. 292 dated April 14, 1997, (the "Contract") to Berkeley Family Limited Partnership, a Colorado Limited Partnership (the "Applicant") for 1.0 cubic feet of water per second from the District's direct flow rights and 66.0 acre feet of storage or other augmentation water owned or controlled by the District to serve certain property located in Garfield County, Colorado; and WHEREAS, the Applicant has requested that the Contract be amended to recognize an increase of the number of single-family homes from a 95 -unit PUD (consisting of single family homes with 5,000 square feet of lawn and garden irrigation per lot) to 198 single family homes (with a reduced amount of irrigation), and to include supplemental irrigation of a sod farm. The revised requirements for the amended contract are set forth in Exhibit A hereto. WHEREFORE, the Contract shall be and hereby is amended to provide that the Applicant shall be entitled to receive and apply to beneficial use the 1.0 cubic feet of water per second from the District's direct flow rights and 66.0 acre feet per year of storage or other augmentation water owned or controlled by the District. The contract amount is based on the water requirements table attached hereto as Exhibit A. Any increase or change in the water requirements to be served by the District will require an amendment to the subject Contract. The Amendment also incorporates the following provisions, to which the Applicant agrees: 1. By acceptance of this amendment, Applicant acknowledges that within two years of the date hereof or such later date as the District may approve, the Applicant shall file with the Water Court of Water Division No. 5 a water rights plan of augmentation for utilization of the water allotted hereunder at the location and for the purposes set forth more fully in the Water Allotment Contract, as amended. Otherwise, the Amendment may be included in a water rights plan of augmentation to be filed by the District with the expenses thereof to be shared prorata by the Contract holders included in such plan; provided that the inclusion of the Applicant's Amendment in the District's plan of augmentation shall be at the District's sole discretion. The District makes no warranty that it will secure approval of the plan. In the event the District includes the Applicant's Amendment in the District's application for a plan of augmentation, the Applicant acknowledges that execution of the subject contract constitutes waiver of any notice of the application for the plan for augmentation by the Water Referee or the Water Clerk under C.R.S. § 37-92-302(3)(c)(1). Applicant will provide such information and assistance, including testimony, as may be needed for judicial approval of the plan. The District may establish an augmentation plan fee to be paid by the holder of any contract or amendment to be included within a plan of augmentation to be filed by the District, which fee shall be payable in advance of the inclusion of such contract or amendment in a District plan of augmentation and may be based on the District's good faith estimate of the anticipated expense of such plan of augmentation. If such augmentation plan fee paid by a contract 1 • • holder exceeds the contract holder's prorata portion of the actual expenses incurred by the District in completing said plan of augmentation, the District shall refund such excess to the contract holder. 2. Any and all conditions imposed upon the release and diversion of water allotted hereunder in any water rights plan of augmentation or other water rights decree of the Water Court for Water Division No. 5 shall be incorporated herein as a condition of approval of this contract. Granting of this allotment contract does not constitute the District's representation that the Applicant will receive a well permit or water rights decree for the land to be benefitted hereby. 3. PAYMENT: Applicant shall pay annually for the water service described herein at a price to be fixed annually by the Board of Directors of the District for such service. Payment of the annual fee shall be made, in full, within fifteen (15) days after the date of a notice from the District that the payment is due. Said notice will advise the Applicant, among other things, of the water delivery year to which the payment shall apply and the price which is applicable to that year. If a payment is not made by the due date, a late fee of S50 (or other amount as the Board may set from time to time) will be assessed and final written notice of the delinquent account and late fee assessment will be sent by the District to the Applicant at Applicant's address set forth in the Assignment attached. If payment is not made within thirty (30) days after said final written notice, the District may, at its option, elect to terminate all of the Applicant's right, title, or interest under this Contract, in which event the water right allotted hereunder may be transferred, leased or otherwise disposed of by the District at the discretion of its Board of Directors. 4. WELL PERMIT: If Applicant intends to divert through a well, then Applicant must provide to District a copy of Applicant's valid well permit before the District is obligated to deliver any water hereunder, and it is the Applicant's continuous duty to maintain a valid well permit. Applicant shall also comply with all restrictions and limitations set forth in the well permit obtained from the Colorado Division of Water Resources. Applicant must comply with the well -spacing requirements set forth in C.R.S. §37-90-137, as amended, if applicable. Compliance with said statutory well -spacing criteria shall be an express condition of the extension of service hereunder, and the District shall in no way be liable for an Applicant's failure to comply. 5. MEASURING DEVICE OR METER: Applicant agrees to provide, at its own expense, a totalizing flow meter with remote readout to continuously and accurately measure at all times all water diverted pursuant to the terms of Applicant's water right and the terms of this Contract. Applicant agrees to provide accurate readings from such device or meter to District upon District's request. Applicant acknowledges that failure to comply with this paragraph could result in legal action to terminate Applicant's diversion of water by the State of Colorado Division of Water Resources. By signing this Contract, Applicant hereby specifically allows District, through its authorized agent, to enter upon Applicant's property during ordinary business hours for the purposes of determining Applicant's actual use of water. 6. COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 404 OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT. Applicant shall comply with Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and consult with the Army Corps ofEngineers to complete any Section 404 compliance that may be required as a result of the construction of any facilities necessary to use contract water. 'LLWP- &$AM BlCDh SM••••Immay=AY 2 • • • 7. CONTRACT TERMINATION: A. Termination by District: 1. The District may terminate this Contract for any violation or breach of the terms of this Contract by Applicant. 2. The District may terminate this Contract if, in its discretion, any judicial or administrative proceedings initiated by Applicant threaten the District's authority to contract for delivery or use of the District's water rights, or threaten the District's permits, water rights, or other interests of the District. B. Termination by Applicant: 1. Applicant may terminate this Contract in its entirety for any reason by notifying the District in writing of the termination on or before April 1. Notice by said date will prevent the Applicant's liability for the next annual contract charge. Except as herein expressly amended and modified, said Water Allotment Contract shall be and remain in full force and effect. Dated this 5th day of December , 200 1 . Bv: STA 1h. OF COLORADO ) ) ss COUNTY OF GARFIELD ) BERKELEY FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Michael E. B - ey, General Partner The above and foregoing document was acknowledged before me this 5th day of December , 200 1, by Michael Berkeley, General Partner of Berkeley Family Limited Partnership. Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires: 8/4/2003 EAWP- aNSM4 IVCdM1.0.Agmoimmi T.!d Notary Public j 3 • • The foregoing Amendment to Water Allotment Contract is approved by the Board of Directors of the Basalt Water Conservancy District on this 6th day of November, 2001. Attest: 1 )'7 J - Barbara Mick, Secretary Basalt Water Conservancy District 77 w BY: t. t -C r'1:(A 4 Arthur Bowles, President • GEOLOGIC.AND SOILS REPORT • • • HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. 5020 Road 154 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Fax 970 945-8454 Phone 970 945-7988 PRELLMLNARY GEOTECILNiCAL ENGLVEERLtiG STUDY PROPOSED LAKE SPRINGS RANCH P.U.D. COUNTY ROADS 114 AND 119, GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO JOB NO. 197 348 AUGUST 29 , 1997 PREPARED FOR: MIKE AND MACI BERKELY CIO LAND DESIGN PARTNERSHIP ATTN: RON LISTON 918 COOPER AVENUE GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81602- • August 29, 1997 • • Mike and Maci Berkeley c/o Land Design Partnership Attn: Ron Liston 918 Cooper Avenue Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81602 Job No. 197 348 Subject: Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Study, Proposed Lake Springs P.U.D., County Roads 114 and 119, Garfield County, Colorado. Dear: Mr. and Mrs Berkeley: As requested, we have conducted a geotechnical study for the proposed residential development. It should be possible to develop the project as proposed without encountering severe constraints or hazards associated with the geology. Evaporite related ground deformations at very slow rates may still be occurring in the project area. Because of this building sites should not be located across faults in the eastern part of the property. Also the risk of building damage can be reduced by special foundation designs. Dense hard basalt may be at relatively shallow depths in many areas and difficult excavation conditions should be expected. Subsurface conditions encountered in the exploratory borings drilled throughout the proposed development area are variable and generally consist of sandy clay and gravel to boulder size basalt fragments in a sandy clay matrix. Groundwater was not encountered in the borings and the soils are typically slightly moist. The clays are typically medium to high plasticity and expansive when wetted. Spread footings placed on the natural clay or basalt fragment subsoils and designed for an allowable bearing pressure of 1,500 psf to 4,000 psf appear suitable for building support in most of the development area. Expansive clay soils, mainly found west of County Road 114 could require special designs to limit the risk of foundation and floor slab heave. Concentrated load on spread footings, structural mats, deep foundations such as drilled piers and crawlspace below floors are possible methods to mitigate expansion potential. The report which follows describes our investigation, summarizes our findings, and presents our recommendations suitable for planning and preliminary design. It is important that we provide consultation during design, and field services during construction to review and monitor the implementation of the geotechnical recommendations. Due to the expansive clays encountered at the site, subsoil studies for each building area are recommended. If you have any questions regarding this report, please contact us. Sincerely, HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. Steven L. Pawlak P.E. Rev. By RGM SLP/RGM/kw • TABLE OF CONTENTS PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY 1 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 1 SITE CONDITIONS 2 REGIONAL GEOLOGIC SETTING 2 PROJECT AREA GEOLOGY 4 LAKE DEPOSITS 4 ALLUVIAL FANS AND STREAM VALLEY ALLUVIUM 4 COLLUVIUM 4 BASALT FLOWS AND COLLAPSE DEBRIS 5 FAULTS 5 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 6 GEOLOGIC SITE ASSESSMENT 7 CONSTRUCTION RELATED SLOPE INSTABILITY 7 REGIONAL EVAPORITE DEFORMATION 7 • EARTHQUAKES 8 EXCAVATION DIFFICULTIES 8 PRELIMINARY DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS 8 FOUNDATIONS 8 FLOOR SLABS 9 UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM 10 SITE GRADING 10 SURFACE DRAINAGE 11 PAVEMENT SUBGRADE 11 LIMITATIONS 11 FIGURE I - GEOLOGY MAP FIGURES 2 & 3 - LOGS OF EXPLORATORY PITS FIGURE 4 - LEGEND AND NOTES FIGURES 5 -7 - SWELL -CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS FIGURE 8 - GRADATION ANALYSES TEST RESULTS • FIGURE 9 - HVEEM STABILOMETER TEST RESULTS TABLE I - SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS • PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY This report presents the results of a preliminary geotechnical engineering study for the proposed development at Lake Springs Ranch, County Roads 114 and 119, Garfield County, Colorado. The project site is shown on Fig. 1. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the geologic and subsurface conditions and their potential impact on the project. The study was conducted in accordance with our proposal for geotechnical engineering services to Mike and Maci Berkeley, dated May 23, 1997. A field exploration program consisting of a geologic reconnaissance and exploratory borings was conducted to obtain information on the site and subsurface conditions. Samples obtained during the field exploration were tested in the laboratory to determine classification. compressibility or swell and other engineering characteristics of the on-site soils. The results of the field exploration and laboratory testing were analyzed to develop recommendations for project planning and preliminary design. This report summarizes the data obtained during this study and presents our conclusions and recommendations based on the proposed development. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The Lake Springs Ranch PUD will be a residential development consisting of 96 single family lots, a neighborhood commercial district, and open space, see Fig. 1. The single family lots will be one acre or larger. A network of streets will be constructed to provide access to the lots. The development will be serviced by a community sewer and water system. Development will be on the valley side to the east of Spring Valley. The Rivendell Sod and Tree Farm presently operates on the valley floor and lower valley side. Much of this area will remain as an Agriculture Open Space District. If development plans change significantly from those described, we should be notified to reevaluate the recommendations presented in this report. • 2 - SITE CONDITIONS The Lake Springs Ranch PUD is located on the northeastern side of Spring Valley which is a broad, shallow valley on the basalt plateau to the east of the Roaring Fork River valley. The property covers parts of Sections 32, 33, and 34 T. 6 S., R 88 W. and part of Section 4, T. 7 S., R 88 W. The topography in the area is shown on Fig. 1. Slopes along the floor of Spring Valley are nearly level. The valley side to the east is rolling. Slopes there range from 10 to 20% and some of the steeper hillsides are 40%. Major drainages with perennial streams are not present on the valley side where the single family lots are planned. This area is drained by small ephemeral streams which only have surface flow during periods of heavy precipitation or snowpack melt. A small pond behind a low earth embankment is located just to the east of the existing ranch headquarters. Poorly drained ground and a small perennial stream are present on the floor of Spring Valley At the time of this study development on the property consisted of the Rivendell Sod and Tree Farm, a single family residence on Lot 1, and a small cabin to the southeast of the pond. The property was being used for grazing. Vegetation on the valley side outside the cultivated areas consists of sage, oak and other brush. County Roads 114 and 119 cross through the property. REGIONAL GEOLOGIC SETTING The project site is located on a basalt plateau to the east of the Roaring Fork valley. The basalt plateau at the site is a second -order, structural bench between the Grand Hogback Monocline to the west, the White River Uplift to the north and the Roaring Fork Syncline to the south and east (Tweto and Others, 1978). These regional structural features developed during the Laramide Orogeny about 40 to 70 million years H -P GEOTECH • -3 ago. Recent studies by the Colorado Geological Survey (Kirkham and Widmann, 1997) show that the structural bench is a complexly deformed collapse block of regional extent. The collapse block formes a regional topographic depression with has much as 4,000 feet of relief. The regional collapse block is roughly circular -shaped with a diameter of about 16 miles. The regional collapse block covers about 200 square miles. Carbondale is located near its center. The geologic structure in the regional collapse block is complex. The complex structure appears to result from shallow crustal deformations related to evaporite dissolution and flowage from beneath the area (Kirkham and Widmann, 1997). The evaporite is in the Pennsylvanian -age, Eagle Valley Evaporite which lies at a relatively shallow depth below the surface of the regional collapse block. Much of the deformation in the regional collapse block is younger than the basalt flows in the area. The basalt flows and other volcanic rocks in the area have been dated at 3.0 to 22.4 million year before the present (Kirkham and Widmann, 1997). Some deformation has affected Pleistocene -age (10,000 to 1.8 million years old) deposits and landforms and possibly Holocene -age (less than 10,000 year old) deposits and landforms. The deformation structures include (1) synclinal sags and bowl -like depressions, (2) short orthogonal faults, (3) large arc -shaped, half grabens, and (4) collapse debris. Spring Valley is a half graben with a fault along its western side. The basalt flow along the eastern side of the Spring Valley consists mostly of collapse debris. The collapse debris appear to be the result of differential vertical regional subsidence resulting from evaporite dissolution. The collapse debris along the eastern side of Spring Valley appears to also have a relatively high horizontal component of subsidence deformation. The collapse debris consists of highly fractured and locally brecciated basalt flows intermixed with intact but strongly tilted blocks of basalt which range up to about 20 acres in size. H -P GEOTECH • 4 PROJECT AREA GEOLOGY Our interpretation of the geologic conditions in the project area is shown on Fig. 1. The principle geologic features in the area are described below. LAKE DEPOSITS Spring Valley was the site of a former lake and lake deposits are present along the valley floor and lower valley sides. Two ages of lake deposits are present. The younger lake deposits (Qly) underlie the relatively level valley floor. The older lake deposits (Qlo) underlie a low terrace which is about 20 to 40 feet above the valley floor. The lake deposits are interstratified silty clay, silt, and fine to coarse -Grained sand. • ALLUVIAL FANS AND STREAM VALLEY ALLUVIUM Small alluvial fans (Qaf) are present locally in the lower parts of several of the ephemeral drainages on the eastern valley side. Stream valley alluvium (Qal) is present below the upland valley floor in the eastern part of the property. The fan and stream valley alluvium is a stratified sandy clay with scattered basalt fragments. The basalt fragments range from gravel to boulder -size. • COLLUVIUM Colluvium (Qc) is present below the rolling terrain that forms the eastern valley side. The colluvium consists of clay and gravel to boulder -size basalt fragments in a sandy clay matrix. The matrix makes up most of the deposit and there is usually little inter -grain contact between the basalt fragments. With depth the colluvium grades into highly fractured basalt with a sandy clay fracture filling. In the exploratory borings the upper colluvium was from 7 to greater than 20 feet thick. H -P GEOTECH • • • -5- BASALT FLOWS AND COLLAPSE DEBRIS The colluvium on the eastern valley side is underlain by basalt flows (Tb) which have broken by differential subsidence to form collapse debris. The collapse debris consists of highly fractured and locally brecciated basalt flows intermixed with intact but strongly tilted blocks of basalt which range up to about 20 acres in size. Also present in this area are inter -flow sediments. FAULTS Two, high -angle normal faults are inferred to cross the eastern part of the property, see Fig. I. The faults trend to the northeast and are down -thrown on their western sides. The faults are part of a regional orthogonal fault system in the regional collapse block (Kirkham and Widmann, 199 7). The faults were produced by evaporite tectonics as discussed in the Regional Geologic Setting section above. 1.7LLD EXPLORATION The field exploration for the project was conducted on June 30 and July 1, 1997. Ten exploratory borings were drilled at the locations shown on Fig. 1 to evaluate the subsurface conditions. The borings were advanced with 4 inch diameter continuous flight auger powered by a truck -mounted Longyear BK-51HD drill rig. The borings were logged by a representative of Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. Access to ti drill rig was limited to on or near the trails and roads at the site due to the sloping terrain and vegetation cover. Samples of the subsoils were taken with 13/8 inch and 2 inch I.D. spoon samplers. The samplers were driven into the subsoils at various depths with blows from a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches. This test is similar to the standard penetration test described by ASTM Method D-1586. The penetration resistance vale: are an indication of the relative density or consistency of the subsoils. Depths at whicii H -P GEOTECH • 6 the samples were taken and the penetration resistance values are shown on the Logs of Exploratory Borings, Figs. 2 and 3. Disturbed bulk samples of the upper soils were also taken for roadway subgrade analysis. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Graphic logs of the subsurface conditions encountered at the site are shown on Figs. 2 and 3. The subsoils were variable and generally consist of 1 to 2 feet of topsoil overlying very stiff to hard sandy clay and gravel to boulder size basalt fragments in a sandy clay matrix. The clays are generally medium to high plasticity. The subsoils are typically calcareous especially east of County Road 114. Drilling of the basalt fragments subsoils was difficult due to the rock size and hardness and refusal was encountered in the deposit. Laboratory testing performed on samples obtained from the borings included natural moisture content and density, Atterberg limits, gradation analyses and Hveem stabilometer 'R' values. Results of swell -consolidation testing performed on relatively undisturbed drive samples, presented on Figs. 5, 6 and 7, indicate the clay soils have low compressibility under light loading. The samples from Borings 1-5 showed a low to high expansion potential when wetted under a constant light surcharge. The non expansive clays, Borings 6 and 8 samples, exhibited moderate compressibility upon increased loading after wetting. Results of gradation analyses performed on drive samples (minus 1/ -inch fraction) of the basalt fragment subsoils are shown on Fig. 8. Atterberg limits testing indicates the clay fraction of the subsoils is of medium to high plasticity. The Hveem stabilometer testing results had 'R' values of 5 and 29. The laboratory testing is summarized in Table I. No free water was encountered in the borings at the time of drilling and the subsoils were slightly moist. H -P GEOTECH • 7 GEOLOGIC SITE ASSESSMENT It should be possible to develop the property as proposed without encountering severe constraints or hazards associated with the geology. There are, however, some geologic conditions which should be considered in project planning as described below. CONSTRUCTION RELATED SLOPE INSTABILITY We do not expect potential problems with construction related slope instability in the proposed development areas if construction is not considered on slopes steeper than about 30%. Recommendations for site grading are presented below in the Site Grading section of this report. i REGIONAL EVAPORITE DEFORMATION The project area is located in a regional collapse block where regional ground deformations have been associated with evaporite dissolution and flowage from beneath the area. It is uncertain if this deformation is still an active geologic process or if deformation has stopped. If ground deformation is still occurring, it is likely that deformation rates are very slow and occur over relatively broad areas. Abrupt, differential fault creep could be localized along the inferred faults in the eastern part of the project area. A fault may cross through Lots 17, 18, 19, and 20. Because of this it is recommended that site specific studies be made on these lots to determine if a fault is actually present. If a geologically young fault is present, then the building site should not be located across the fault. Although the potential for ground deformation problems appears to be low, the project area can not be considered totally risk free. The risk of building damage can be reduced by special foundation designs. These special foundation designs would be a heavily reinforced mat foundation without a basement. • H -P GEOTECH • • • -8 EARTHQUAKES The project area could experience moderately strong earthquake related ground shaking. Modified Mercalli Intensity VI ground shaking should be expected during a reasonable service life for the development, but the probability for stronger ground shaking is low. Intensity VI ground shaking is felt by most people and causes general alarm, but results in negligible damage to structures of good design and construction. The faults in the study area, in our opinion, do not increase the seismic potential. All occupied structures in the development should be designed to withstand moderately strong ground shaking with little or no damage and not to collapse under stronger ground shaking. The region is in the Uniform Building Code, Seismic Risk Zone 1. Based on our current understanding of the earthquake hazard in this pan of Colorado, we see no reason to increase the commonly accepted seismic risk zone for the area. EXCAVATION DIFFICULTIES Dense hard basalt should be expected at relatively shallow depths at many of the proposed building sites and along road and utility alignments. Excavations in the dense hard basalt in most areas will require ripping and blasting may be needed. PRELIMINARY DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS The conclusions and recommendations presented below are based on the proposed development, subsurface conditions encountered in the exploratory borings, and our experience in the area. The recommendations are suitable for planning and preliminary design but site specific studies should be conducted for individual lot development. FOUNDATIONS H -P GEOTECH • • • -9 Bearing conditions will vary depending on the specific location of the building on the property. Spread footings placed on the natural subsoils appear suitable for building support in most of the development area. We expect the footings can be sized for an allowable bearing pressure in the range of 1,500 psf to 4,000 psf. Expansive clays, mainly found west of County Road 114, could require special design to limit the risk of foundation and floor slab heave. Concentrated loads and spread footings that impose a minimum dead load pressure should be feasible in low expansive clay areas. In areas of relatively deep and higher expansive clays, a structural mat or drilled pier foundation may be needed. Nested boulders and loose matrix soils may need treatment such as placing compacted fill or concrete backfill. Foundation walls should be designed to span local anomalies and to resist lateral earth loadings when acting as retaining structures. Below grade areas and retaining walls should be protected from wetting and hydrostatic loading by use of an underdrain system. The footings should have a minimum depth of 36 inches for frost protection. A graded pad cut into the natural soils appears suitable for support of an above ground tank at the proposed tank location (Boring 10). FLOOR SLABS Slab -on -grade construction should be feasible for bearing on the non -expansive natural soils. There could be some post construction slab movement at sites with hydrocompressive soils or expansive clays. To reduce the effects of some differential movement, floor slabs should be separated from all bearing walls and columns with expansion joints. Floor slab control joints should be used to reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking. A minimum 4 -inch thick layer of free -draining gravel should underlie basement level slabs to facilitate drainage. In the more expansive clay areas, a structurally supported floor over a crawlspace may be warranted to avoid distress to slabs caused by wetting of the expansive clay. H -P GEOTECH • - 10 - UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM Although free water was not encountered in the exploratory borings, it has been our experience in the area and where there are stiff clays that local perched groundwater can develop during times of heavy precipitation or seasonal runoff. An underdrain system should be provided to protect below grade construction, such as retaining walls, crawlspace and basement areas from wetting and hydrostatic pressure buildup. The drains should consist of drainpipe surrounded above the invert level with free -draining granular material. The drain should be placed at each level of excavation and at least 1 foot below lowest adjacent finish grade and sloped at a minimum 1% to a suitable gravity outlet. SITE GRADING • The following criteria are recommended for site grading. If it is necessary to • perform extensive grading, it should be evaluated on a site specific basis. Cut depths for the building pads and driveway access should not exceed about 10 feet. Fills should be limited to about 10 feet deep, especially where they encroach steep downhill sloping areas. Deeper cut and fill sections may be feasible and should be studied on an individual basis. Structural fills should be compacted to at least 95 % of the maximum standard Proctor density near optimum moisture content. Prior to fill placement, the subgrade should be carefully prepared by removing all vegetation and topsoil. The fill should be benched into the portions of the hillside exceeding 20% grade. The on-site basalt fragment soils excluding oversized rock and topsoil should be suitable for use in embankment fills. The expansive clay soils may not be suitable for use beneath structures sensitive to differential settlement/heave. The clays could be difficult to work with due to their high plasticity. Permanent unretained cut and fill slopes should be graded at 2 horizontal to 1 vertical or flatter and protected against erosion by revegetation, rock riprap or other means. We can review site grading plans for the project as needed. H -P GEOTECH • • • -11- SURFACE DRAINAGE The grading plan for the subdivision should consider runoff from steep uphill slopes through the project and at individual sites. Water should not be allowed to pond which could impact slope stability and foundations. Backfill next to buildings should be well compacted and have a positive slope away from the building for a distance of at least 10 feet. Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill and landscape irrigation should be restricted. PAVEMENT SUBGRADE The clay subgrade was found to have an Hveem 'R' value of 5 to 29 and is considered a relatively poor material for support of pavements. The basalt fragment soil should be a fair support material. In clay subgrade areas we recommend an 'R' value of 10 be assumed for preliminary pavement design. An 'R' value of 25 can be assumed for the more granular soils. The actual road subgrade should be evaluated for pavement support at the time of construction. LINIITATIONS This report has been prepared according to generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no warranty either expressed or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the field reconnaissance, review of published geologic reports, the exploratory borings located as shown on Fig. 1, the proposed type of construction and our experience in the area. Our findings include interpolation and extrapolation of the subsurface conditions identified at the exploratory borings and variations in the subsurface conditions may not become evident until excavation is performed. If conditions encountered during construction appear different H -P GEOTECH • - 12 - from those described in this report, we should be notified so that re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for planning and preliminary design purposes. We are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. As the project evolves, we should provide continued consultation, conduct additional evaluations and review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations. Significant design changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommendations presented herein. We recommend site specific subsoil studies for the individual lot development, observation of excavations and foundation bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a representative of the geotechnical engineer. • Respectfully Submitted, • HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEO INC. Steven L. Pawlak, P.E. and by: P Mock Engineering Geologist •1 222 ='r, •.•••_:.w:: • SLP/ro cc: Land Design Partnership - Attn: Ron Liston H -P GEOTECH • • • - 13 - REFERENCES Kirkham RM. and Widmann B. L., 1997, Geology Map of the Carbondale Quadrangle, Garfield County, Colorado: Colorado Geological Survey Open File Report 97-3. Kirkham, R.M. and Rogers, W.P., 1981, Earthquake Potential in Colorado - A Preliminary Evaluation: Colorado Geological Survey Bulletin 43. Tweto, and Others, 1978, Geology Map of the Leadville 1 °X 2 ° Quadrangle, Northwestern Colorado: U.S. Geological Survey Map I-999. H -P GEOTECH U) 0 z_ li 0 co 0 Z_ O co Z_ O N z 0 021 z_ 0 Depth — Feet 11 III111111111111111111111 N CV U) N O to 0 N N r-. rico II p 0 0 0 \ X. . \ \ \ " \ \ 1 1 N. N. N. L 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 X. ti O O O N N N W O N \ \ 0 0 \ U p 0 n n n 30 ` u-) . N N N Q 0 h N 3 p 1 1 1 1 1 1 1- .1 1 1 °4•: •l: g '• 1..•Yo"3••••Q . a'• 0o\ a, _ m n 0 O N n N or;0 U) N N ,1 Lo F.4- 0 r 3 1 a 00 ` , \ t Pik . X. X. Pk \ N. X. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1C ••ti3 1p. • �t •„ ... • �[.• 1 l N NN N N N \ 1 \ \ n 0 p O Of 1N^ -S---- r(�]—'li 0 rn N \ ` .'rt \ 1 \ ` \ t ♦ ♦ ` \ \ \ \ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 N. 1 1 1 1 N. 1 1 N. 1 1 \ 0 l!i 0 lI] • 01 1 li L 1 1 i liII1IIIlIII(III Depth — Feet Note: Explanation of symbols 197 348 HEPWORTH — PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL. INC. LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS Fig. 2 EE 0 m Depth — Feet 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 N 0 11 0 I I 0 +I _ • O n n m :off ''� "�r- . '.°`• y� ` =''b•:- '4'� .�A • � d'�te-meg � �: A . ;:ata i'••.Q: A m O CC/ \ N 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1. • 0 ti N N N \ II p U 0D M o— c -1t 4-L N 01 0 (15 0 L ♦ . . 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11..1.4R'SP:. {r ..1• N 01 In O �] o In • 111111MM11111[11111111111 1 Depth — Feet c c 0 N cn 0 0 >. 0 0 0 0 0 W ai 0 Z 197 348 HEPWORTH — PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS Fig. 3 LEGEND: ---7 I TOPSOIL; organic sandy silty clay, dry, dark brown, some scattered gravel, root zone. CLAY (CL); silty to sandy, medium to high plasticity, scattered gravel, very stiff to hard, slightly moist, brown to light brown and white, slightly to highly calcareous. BASALT FRAGMENTS (GC); gravel, cobble and boulder size, calcareous sandy clay matrix, medium dense slightly moist, grey and white, low to medium plasticity fines. Relatively undisturbed drive sample; 2—inch I.D. California liner sample. Drive sample; standard penetration test ( SPT ), 1 3/8—inch I.D. split spoon sample, ASTM D — 1586. 22/12 Drive sample blow count; indicates that 22 blows of a 140—pound hammer falling 30 inches were required to drive the California or SPT sampler 12 inches. F NC• Practical rig refusal. Where shown above bottom of boring, indicates that multiple attempts were made to advance the boring. 1. Exploratory borings were drilled on June 30 and July 1, 1997 with a 4--incn dicmeter continuous flight power auger. 2. Locations of exploratory borings were measured approximately by pacing from features shown on the site plan provided. 3. Elevations of exploratory borings were not measured and logs of exploratory bcrings are drawn to depth. 4. The exploratory boring locations and elevations should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. 5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory boring logs represent the approximate boundaries between material types and transitions may be gradual. 6. No free water was encountered in the borings at the time of drilling. Fluctuation in water level may occur with time_ 7. Laboratory Testing Results: WC = Water Content ( Z ) DO = Dry Density ( pcf ) +4 = Percent retained on No. 4 sieve. —200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve. LL = Liquid Limit ( 7. ) PI = Plasticity Index ( % R = Hveem Stabilometer Value • 197 348 HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. LEGEND AND NOTES Fig. 4 100 Fig. • 4 3 2 0 c 1 0. W Compression 0 1 Moisture Content = 12.1 percent Dry Density = 111 pcf Sample of: Sandy Clay From: Boring 1 at 10 Feet Expansion upon wetting . 0.1 g — Expansion c 0 N 0. E 0 U • 0 1.0 10 APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf 100 Moisture Content = 17.6 percent Dry Density = 101 pcf Sample of: Sandy Cloy From: Boring 2 at 2 Feet --r—"'4 Expansion upon wetting 0.1 197 348 1.0 10 APPUED PRESSURE — ksf HEPWORTH — PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC_ SWELL—CONSOLIDAT1ONTEST RESULTS 100 Fig. 6 • c 0 7 6 c S c 0 W Compression • 4 3 2 1 0 t c 0(13 0 c 0 0 x w 1 Compression 2 Moisture Content = 16.9 percent Dry Density = 100 pcf Sample of: Sandy Clay From: Boring 4 at 5 Feet Expansion upon wetting 0.1 1.0 10 APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf 100 0.1 197 348 1.0 10 APPUED PRESSURE — ksf HEPWORTH — PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. SWELL—CONSOLIDATIONTEST RESULTS I ' I Moisture Content = 13.7 percent Ory Density = 98 pcf Sample of: Sandy Clay From: Boring 5 at 10 Feet 0 Expansion upon wetting 0.1 197 348 1.0 10 APPUED PRESSURE — ksf HEPWORTH — PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. SWELL—CONSOLIDATIONTEST RESULTS 100 Fig. 7 • rke Compression • Compression 0 1 2 3 4 5 0 1 2 Moisture Content = 19.7 percent Dry Density = 86 pcf Sample of: Calcareous Sandy Clay From: Boring 6 at 3 Feet Compression upon wetting 0.1 1.0 10 APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf 100 • 0.1 197 348 1.0 10 APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf HEPWORTH — PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. SWELL—CONSOLIDATIONTEST RESULTS Moisture Content = 21.5 percent Dry• Density = 100 pcf Sample of:Calcareous Scndy Clay From: Boring 8 at 3 Feet 1 -------71)------------..........0. No movement upon wetting • 0.1 197 348 1.0 10 APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf HEPWORTH — PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. SWELL—CONSOLIDATIONTEST RESULTS Fig. 8 • 0 z 1n a z w U w • HYDROMETER ANALYSS Ij TI E READacs 24 HR. 7 HR 45 IYN. 15 IAN. 60 1414.19 MW. 4 MH. 100 90 60 70 60 50 40 30 SEW ANALYSE 1 IAN. 4- V.S. STAMTARO SERFS CLEAR SOV 4.RE Cf.JANGS 200 1100 #50 130 #16 }6 $ 3/6'1/2'3/4' 1 1 I .r S'6' 0 1. t_ { I { I t I 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 20 10 0 r t { { .001 .002 .005 .000 .019 .037 .074 .150 60 90 .300 .600 1.18 236 4.75 9.5123 19.0 37.5 70.2 152 203 127 DIAMETER OF PARTICLES iN MILLIMETERS CLAY TO SILT SAND FINE I HEDNII 'COARSE 197 348 GRAVEL 49 % FINE CC.ARSE COBBLES SAND 28 Z SILT AND CLAY 23 7 LIQUID OMIT PLASTICITY INDEX 7. 100 yO iyMrM/•11M SAMPLE OF: Clayey Sandy Gravel =ROM: Boring 10 at 5 and 10 Feet Combined HEPWORTH — PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. GRADATION TEST RESULTS Fig. 9 • • • TEST SPECIMEN 1 2 3 4 MOISTURE CONTENT (%) 18.6 20.4 22.2 DENSITY (pcf) 110.8 106.3 105.9 "R" VALUE/EXUDATION PRESSURE (psi) 37/456 31/321 22/220 100 90 "R" 80 V A L 60 U E 70 50 197 348 40 30 20 10 0 "R" VALUE AT 300 psi = 29 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 EXUDATION PRESSURE (psi) SOIL TYPE: Silty Clay SAMPLE LOCATION: Boring 1 at 1 to 5 Feet GRAVEL % SAND LIQUID LIMIT 35 % HEPWORTH — PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. SILT AND CLAY 90 % PLASTICITY INDEX 21 % HVEEM STABILOMETER TEST RESULTS JOB No. 197 348 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL INC. • LABORATORY TEST RESULTS LL 0 SUMMARY SOIL OR BEDROCK TYPE Silty Clay Sandy Clay I Sandy Clay a co U > D N Sandy Clay >- U > C CO ro U >. C CO Sandy Clay Calcareous Sandy Clay 1 Calcareous Silty Sand Matrix 11 Sandy Clay II Sandy Clay 11 Clayey Sandy Gravel II 's' rn N l COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (PSP) ATTERBERG LIMITS PLASTIC INDEX N M N .- O 5 M C'') LL) V C to Z w i O 0 3 ,. > O a Z co CC cn N N Z O 0 0 Z- c0 W g ,- 5 r a p w a O Z 0 .r- - N O O O c) 80 oo J 7 < 2 W& .- 2 o O 2 uN _ ,... cD M d :D N 13.7 1 n m CO to N I� p II SAMPLE LOCATION N LO t.C) to til 00 M M 5 & 10 combined O i .- CN M Cr to n 0 O CO v Oa = m® '3 "O no� Z rD z �r• G ld HONV I SJNI2JdS 3>IV1 dVIN A001030 —n 0 I A ' c�N� / A D .--O > o 19 f.... ,/ .\- 1/ " " _ _, _, t/' 0 ‘ 1, ,,%/, i i i 1 /I 0 1 c"O\ ./0 i ' .,r 0' N r \\\\\�( �".. \ \ \ \•. \.• • I 0 0 0 • ., . s 0 r g w > ow m w -i m 1' c 21 G v O y i /. -�C o0 g C co 7C 0 2 p _ c. Rd.r 0 71 cn m m cn .'.--" Co at d > o To D v1cm 2t F p5 p C 06 a o ri w w F. w m a m 0 o a :sraa 5C • SCS INFORMATION • • • • SOIL TYPE 34 EMPEDRADO LOAM (2-6% SLOPES, DEEP, WELL DRAINED, MODERATE PERMEABILITY: SOIL TYPE B) 35: EMPEDRADO LOAM (6-127. SLOPES, DEEP, WELL DRAINED, MODERATE PERMEABILITY: SOIL TYPE 8) 43: FORELLE-BROWNSTO COMPLEX (6-127. SLOPES, DEEP, WELL DRAINED, MODERATE PERMEABILITY: SOIL TYPE B) 69: KILGORE SILT LOAM (ALLUVIAL FANS, SLOW RUNOFF, MODERATE PERMEABILITY: SOIL TYPE D) 7: MORVAL-TRIDELL COMPLEX (12-50% SLOPES, DEEP, WELL DRAINED, MOD. -MOD. RAPID PERM. SOIL TYPE 8) 4 SHOWALTER-MORAVAL COMPLEX (5-15% SLOPES, DEEP, WELL DRAINED, SLOW -MOD. PERM: SOIL TYPE C) 95: SHOWALTER-MORAVAL COMPLEX (15-257. SLOPES, DEEP, WELL DRA NED, SLOW -MOD. PERM., SOIL TYPE C) HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC. 923 COOPER AVENUE GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 (970) 945-8676 SKETCH.DwC GARFIELD COUNTY LAKE SPRINGS P.UD. SCS SOLS MAP 1"=2000' DES. DJW DR. DJw 1 NCE FILE NO. DATE 9/8/00 2000062.01 SHEE' CF If • 00 r be :ing al :ion -he 3. es, is is.is d is -y he a nd nd Aspen -Gypsum Area, Colorado the range condition deteriorates. mountain big sagebrush, Douglas rabbitbrush. cheatgrass, and annual weeds increase in abundance. This unit responds well to applications of fertilizer, to range seeding, and to proper grazing use. Areas that are heavily infested with undesirable plants can be improved by chemical or mechanical treatment. This unit is well suited to hay and pasture. A seedbed should be prepared on the contour or across the slope where practical. For successful seeding, a seedbed should be prepared and the seed drilled. Applications of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer improve the growth of forage plants. Proper stocking rates. pasture rotation, and restricted grazing during wet periods help to keep the pasture in good condition and protect the soil from erosion. Furrow, border, corrugation, and sprinkler irrigation systems are suited to this soil. Pipe, ditch lining, or drop structures in irrigation ditches facilitate irrigation and reduce the hazard of ditch erosion. This unit is well suited to irrigated crops. If properly managed. It can produce 80 bushels of barley per acre annually. This unit is well suited 'o homesite development. This map unit is in capability subclass IVe, irrigated and nonirrigated. It is in the Deep Loam range site. 33—Earsman-Rock outcrop complex, 12 to 65 percent slopes. This map unit is on mountainsides and ridges. Elevation is 6,00C to 8.500 feet. The average annual precipitation is 14 to 16 inches, the average annual air temperature is 42 to 44 degrees F. and the average frost -free period is 80 to 105 days. This unit is about 45 percent Earsman very stony sandy loam and 35 percent Rock outcrop. The Earsman soil is on the less steep slopes, and the areas of Rock outcrop are in the steeper convex areas throughout the unit. Included in this unit are small areas of Arle and Ansari soils and soils that are similar to the Earsman soil but are deeper over bedrock. Included areas make up about 20 percent of the total acreage. The Earsman soil is shallow and somewhat excessively drained. It formed in residuum and colluvium derived dominantly from calcareous redbed sandstone. About 5 to 10 percent of the surface is covered with flagstones, and 5 to 15 percent is covered with channery fragments. A thin layer of partially decomposed needles, twigs, and leaves is on the surface in many places. Typically, the surface layer is reddish brown very stony sandy loam about 5 inches thick. The substratum to a depth of 19 inches is very channery sandy loam. The depth to hard, calcareous sandstone ranges from 10 to 20 inches. Permeability is moderately rapid in the Earsman Available water capacity is very low. The effective rooting depth is 10 to 20 inches. Runoff is rapid, an the hazard of water erosion is slight to severe on th steeper slopes. This unit is used mainly as rangeland or as wildli. habitat. It also is used as a source of firewood and posts. The potential plant community on this unit is mair pinyon pine, Utah juniper, bluebunch wheatgrass, bottlebrush squirreltail, Indian ricegrass, and wester wheatgrass. The potential production of the native understory vegetation in normal years is about 500 pounds of air-dry vegetation per acre. The slope limits access by livestock. The limited accessibility results in overgrazing of the less slopir areas. If the plant cover is disturbed, protection fror flooding is needed to control gullying, streambank cutting, and sheet erosion. This unit is suited to limited production of firewoo The average annual production is 5 cords per acre. average stocking rate is 100 trees per acre. Specia care is needed to minimize erosion when the stand thinned and when other forest management practicE are applied. This unit is severely limited as a site for homesitE development. Limitations include the shallow depth bedrock. the exposed bedrock. the slope, the rapid runoff rate, and the very high hazard of water erosic This map unit is in capability subclass Vile, nonirrigated. It is in the Pinyon -Juniper woodland si- 34—Empedrado loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes. T. deep. well drained soil is on fans and upland hills. I formed in alluvium and eolian material. Elevation is 6,500 to 9,000 feet. The average annual precipitatic 15 to 18 inches, the average annual air temperaturE 40 to 44 degrees F, and the average frost -free peric 75 to 95 days. Typically, the surface layer is brown loam about inches thick. The subsoil is clay loam about 35 inch thick. The substratum to a depth of 60 inches or mc clay loam. The soil is noncalcareous to a depth of 3. inches and calcareous below that depth. Included in this unit are small areas of soils that < similar to the Empedrado soil but have a darker, thi, surface layer. Also included are small areas of soils are similar to the Empedrado soil but are silt loam c silty clay loam. Included areas make up about 20 percent of the total acreage. Permeability is moderate in the Empedrado soil. Available water capacity is high. The effective rootir depth is 60 inches or more. Runoff is medium, and hazard of water erosion is slight. • 36 This unit is used as hayland or for crops. It is well suited to hay and pasture. Grasses and legumes grow well if adequate fertilizer is used. If properly managed, the unit can produce 5 tons of irrigated grass hay per acre annually. The potential plant community on this unit is mainly western wheatgrass, needleandthread, prairie junegrass, mountain big sagebrush, and Douglas rabbitbrush. Other plants that characterize this site are muttongrass, Letterman needlegrass, common snowberry, Utah serviceberry, and antelope bitterbrush. The average annual production of air-dry vegetation is about 1,500 pounds per acre. If the range condition deteriorates, mountain big sagebrush, Kentucky bluegrass. Douglas rabbitbrush, and annual weeds increase in abundance. This unit is well suited to alfalfa and small grain crops. It has few limitations. Maintaining crop residue on or near the surface helps to control runoff and soil blowingand helps to maintain tilth and the content of firiinic matter. If properly managed. the unit can uce 90 bushels of barley per acre annually. This unit is suited to homesite development. The main limitations are the shrink -swell potential and the moderate permeability. The shrink -swell potential can be minimized by thoroughly prewetting foundation areas. The moderate permeability can be overcome by increasing the size of the absorption field. This map unit is in capability subclass IVe, irrigated and nonirrigated. It is in the Deep Loam range site. 35—Empedrado loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes. This deep, well drained soil is on fans and upland hills. It formed in alluvium and eolian material. Elevation is 6,500 to 9,000 feet. The average annual precipitation is about 15 to 18 inches, the average annual air temperature is 40 to 44 degrees F, and the average frost -free period is 75 to 95 days. Typically, the surface layer is brown loam about 5 inches thick. The subsoil is clay loam about 35 inches thick. The substratum to a depth of 60 inches is clay loam. The soil is noncalcareous to a depth of 38 inches and calcareous below that depth. Included in this unit are small areas of soils that are similar to the Empedrado soil but have a darker, thicker earface layer. Also included are small areas of soils that similar to the Empedrado soil but are silt loam or silty clay loam throughout. Included areas make up about 20 percent of the total acreage. Permeability is moderate in the Empedrado soil. Available water capacity is high. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. Runoff is medium, and the hazard of water erosion is moderate. This unit is used as hayland or for crops. It is well Soil Survey suited to hay and pasture. Grasses and legumes grow well if adequate fertilizer is used. If properly managed, the unit can produce 4 tons of irrigated grass hay per acre annually. This unit is well suited to alfalfa and small grain crops. It is limited mainly by the slope in some areas. t. Limiting tillage during seedbed preparation and controlling weeds help to control runoff and erosion. All tillage should be on the contour or across the slope. If properly managed, the unit can produce 75 bushels of barley per acre annually. The potential plant community on this unit is mainly western wheatgrass, needleandthread, prairie junegrass, mountain big sagebrush, and Douglas rabbitbrush. Other plants that characterize this site are muttongrass, Letterman needlegrass, common snowberry. Utah serviceberry, and antelope bitterbrush. The average annual production of air-dry vegetation is about 1.500 pounds per acre. If the range condition deteriorates. mountain big sagebrush, Kentucky bluegrass. Douglas rabbitbrush, and annual weeds increase in abundance. These plants are dominant when the range is in poor condition; therefore, livestock grazing should be managed so that the desired balance of the preferred species is maintained. This unit is suited to homesite development. The main limitations are the shrink -swell potential and the slope. The shrink -swell potential can be minimized by prewetting foundation areas. The slope is a management concern if septic tank absorption fields are installed. Absorption lines should be installed on the contour. This map unit is in capability subclass IVe, irrigated and nonirrigated. It is in the Deep Loam range site. 36—Empedrado loam, 12 to 25 percent slopes. This deep, well drained soil is on fans and upland hills. It formed in alluvium and eolian material. Elevation is 6,500 to 9,000 feet. The average annual precipitation is 15 to 18 inches, the average annual air temperature is 40 to 44 degrees F, and the average frost -free period is 75 to 95 days. Typically, the surface layer is brown loam about 5 inches thick. The subsoil is clay loam about 35 inches thick. The substratum to a depth of 60 inches or more is clay loam. The soil is noncalcareous to a depth of 38 inches and calcareous below that depth. Included in this unit are small areas of soils that are similar to the Empedrado soil but are silt loam or silty clay loam. Also included are small areas of soils that are similar to the Empedrado soil but have a darker, thicker surface layer. Included areas make up about 15 percent of the total acreage. Permeability is moderate in the Empedrado soil. 1 • Aspen -Gypsum Area, Colorado 39 Suitable management practices include proper grazing use and a planned grazing system. The suitability of this soil for range seeding is poor. The main limitation is the slope. The slope limits access by livestock. The limited accessibility results in overgrazing of the less sloping areas. This unit is poorly suited to homesite development. The main limitation is the slope. This map unit is in capability subclass Vile, nonirrigated. It is in the Deep Loam range site. 41—Evanston loam, 45 to 65 percent slopes. This deep, well drained soil is on alluvial fans, terraces, and valley sides. It formed in mixed alluvium. Elevation is 6,500 to 8.000 feet. The average annual precipitation is 13 to 15 inches, the average annual air temperature is 42 to 46 degrees F, and the average frost -free period is 80 to 90 days. Typically. the surface layer is brown loam about 12 inches thick. The subsoil is clay loam about 13 inches thick. The substratum to a depth of 60 inches or more is loam. Included in this unit are small areas of Tridell soils, areas of Evanston soils that have slopes of less than 45 percent, and small areas of Rock outcrop. Included areas make up about 15 percent of the total acreage. Permeability is moderate in this Evanston soil. Available water capacity is high. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. Runoff is rapid, and the hazard of water erosion is moderate or severe on the steeper slopes. This unit is used mainly as rangeland. It also is used as wildlife habitat. The potential plant community on this unit is mainly bluebunch wheatgrass., western wheatgrass, muttongrass, Douglas rabbitbrush, and mountain big sagebrush. Utah serviceberry, mountain snowberry, prairie junegrass, and Ross sedge commonly are also included. The average annual production of air-dry vegetation is about 1,500 pounds per acre. If the range condition deteriorates, mountain big sagebrush, Douglas rabbitbrush, cheatgrass, and annual weeds increase in abundance. Suitable management practices include proper grazing use and a planned grazing system. The suitability of this soil for range seeding is poor. The main limitation is the slope. The slope limits access by livestock. The limited accessibility results in overgrazing of the less sloping areas. This unit is poorly suited to homesite development. The main limitation is the slope. This map unit is in capability subclass Vile, flonirrigated. It is in the Deep Loam range site. 42—Fluvaquents, 0 to 10 percent slopes. This broadly defined unit consists of deep, somewhat poorly drained. nearly level soils on flood plains and alluvial valley floors. These soils formed in alluvium. Fluvaquents are stratified and vary widely in texture and in depth to sand, gravel, and cobbles. Typically, the surface layer ranges from loamy sand to fine sandy loam or from silt loam to clay loam. The underlying layers are generally sandy loam or loam stratified with sand, gravel, and cobbles. In some areas gravel and cobbles are on or near the surface. The water table fluctuates between depths of 0.5 foot and 2.0 feet during spring and summer. These soils are occasionally flooded for brief periods in late spring and early summer. Included in this unit are small, isolated areas of Redrob soils. Also included are small, isolated areas where water stands at or near the surface all year. These water areas are identified by a special symbol on the soil maps. Included areas make up about 15 percent of the total acreage. These soils are used for wildlife habitat, recreational development. or grazing. The native vegetation is mainly cottonwood, willow, water -tolerant grasses, sedges. and rushes. Mule deer, cottontail rabbit, coyote. and bobcat and ducks, geese, and other native birds find food and shelter on these soils. Where feasible, planting small grain, trees, and shrubs improves the habitat for upland wildlife. This unit is poorly suited to homesite development. The main limitations are the flooding and the seasonal high water table. This map unit is in capability subclass Vlw, nonirrigated. It generally is in the Riverbottom range site. At the higher elevations, however, it is in the Mountain Meadow range site. 43—Forelle-Brownsto complex, 6 to 12 percent slopes. This map unit is on mountains and benches. Elevation is 6.500 to 7,500 feet. The average annual precipitation is 12 to 14 inches, the average annual air temperature is 40 to 44 degrees F, and the average frost -free period is 85 to 105 days. This unit is about 55 percent Forelle soil and 30 percent Brownsto soil. Included in this unit are small areas of Tridell soils on knolls, Mussel and Morval soils in swales, and basalt Rock outcrop. Also included are small areas of soils that are similar to the Forelle and Brownsto soils but have soft bedrock below a depth of 40 inches. Included areas make up about 15 percent of the total acreage. The Forelle soil is deep and well drained. It formed in mixed alluvium derived dominantly from sedimentary • 40 rocks. Typically, the surface layer is brown loam about 6 inches thick. The subsoil is clay loam about 24 inches thick. The substratum to a depth of 60 inches is loam. Permeability is moderate in the Forelle soil. Available water capacity is high. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. Runoff is medium. The hazard of water erosion generally is moderate, but it is severe in areas that contain volcanic ash. The Brownsto soil is deep and well drained. It formed in alluvium derived dominantly from coarse textured, calcareous sandstone and basalt. Typically, the upper part of the surface layer is light brownish gray gravelly sandy loam about 4 inches thick. The lower part is light brownish gray gravelly loam about 7 inches thick. The upper 19 inches of the substratum is very gravelly sandy loam. The next 12 inches is very gravelly loamy sand. The lower part to a depth of 60 inches is gravelly sandy loam. A thin layer of partially decomposed needles, twos, and leaves is on the surface in many places. Permeability is moderate in the Brownsto soil. vailable water capacity is low. The effective rcoting epth is 60 inches or more. Runoff is medium, and the hazard of water erosion is moderate. This unit is used as rangeland or as wildlife habitat. The potential plant community on the Forelle soil is mainly western wheatgrass, bluebunch wheatgrass, Indian ricegrass, Douglas rabbitbrush, and Wyoming big sagebrush. Muttongrass. streambank wheatgrass, and winterfat commonly are also included. The average annual production of air-dry vegetation is about 800 pounds per acre. If the range condition deteriorates, Wyoming big sagebrush, Douglas rabbitbrush, cheatgrass, and annual weeds increase in abundance. The potential plant community on the Brownsto soil is mainly needleandthread, Indian ricegrass, western wheatgrass. and Wyoming big sagebrush. Bluebunch wheatgrass. bottlebrush squirreltail, and scattered Utah juniper and pinyon pine also are included. The average annual production of air-dry vegetation is about 600 pounds per acre. If the range condition deteriorates, Wyoming big sagebrush, Douglas rabbitbrush, cheatgrass, and annual weeds increase in abundance. Suitable management practices include proper grazing use and a planned grazing system. If the quality of range vegetation has seriously deteriorated, seeding is needed. The suitability of this urit for range seeding Alibi good in areas of the Forelle soil and poor in areas of the Brownsto soil. The main limitation is the cobbles and stones on the Brownsto soil. For successful seeding, a seedbed should be prepared and the seed drilled. In areas of the Forelle soil, brush management improves deteriorated areas of range that are producing Soil Survey more woody shrubs than were present in the potential plant community. This unit is suited to homesite development. The main limitations are the slope in the steeper areas and small stones in the Brownsto soil. This map unit is in capability subclass IVe. nonirrigated. The Forelle soil is in the Rolling Loam range site. and the Brownsto soil is in the Stony Foothills range site. 44—Forelle-Brownsto complex, 12 to 25 percent slopes. This map unit is on mountain.side slopes. Elevation is 6,500 to 7,500 feet. The average annual precipitation is 12 to 14 inches, the average annual air temperature is 40 to 44 degrees F, and the average frost -free period is 85 to 105 days. This unit is about 50 percent Forelle soil and 35 percent Brownsto soil. Included in this unit are small areas of Tr dell soils and basalt Rock outcrop on knolls. Also included are small areas of Mussel and Morval soils in the more gently sloping areas. Included areas make up about 15 percent of the total acreage. The Forelle soil is deep and well drained. It formed in mixed alluvium derived dominantly from sedimentary rocks. Typically, the surface layer is brown loam about 6 inches thick. The subsoil is clay loam about 24 inches thick. The substratum to a depth of 60 inches is loam. Permeability is moderate in the Forelle soil. Available water capacity is high. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. Runoff is rapid. The hazard of water erosion generally is moderate, but it is severe in areas that contain volcanic ash. The Brownsto soil is deep and well drained. It formed in alluvium derived dominantly from coarse textured, calcareous sandstone and basalt. Typically, the upper part of the surface layer is light brownish gray gravelly sandy loam about 4 inches thick. The lower part is light brownish gray gravelly loam about 7 inches thick. The upper 19 inches of the substratum is very gravelly sandy loam. The next 12 inches is very gravelly loamy sand. The lower part to a depth of 60 inches is gravelly sandy loam. A thin layer of partially decomposed needles, twigs, and leaves is on the surface in many places. Permeability is moderate in the Brownsto soil. Available water capacity is low. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. Runoff is rapid. and the hazard of water erosion is moderate. This unit is used as rangeland or as wildlife habitat. The potential plant community on the Forelle soil is mainly western wheatgrass, bluebunch wheatgrass, Indian ricegrass, Douglas rabbitbrush, and Wyoming big Aspen -Gypsum Area, Colorado jet her deteriorates, Canada thistle, cheatgrass, stickseed, knotweed, tarweed, and houndstongue increase in abundance. The suitability of this unit for range seeding is poor. If this unit is used for homesite development, the main limitations are the shrink -swell potential, large stones, and the slope. Population growth has resulted in increased construction of homes in areas of this unit. The gravel and cobbles in disturbed areas should be removed if the site is landscaped, particularly in areas used for lawns. The effects of shrinking and swelling can be minimized by using proper engineering designs and by backfilling with material that has a low shrink - swell potential. This map unit is in capability subclass Vile, nonirrigated. The Jerry soil is in the Brushy Loam range site, and the Millerlake soil is in the Stony Loam range site. 68—Jodero loam, 1 to 12 percent slopes. This deep. well drained soil is on alluvial valley floors and in depressions. It formed in alluvium derived dominantly from basic andesite. sandstone. and shale. Elevation is 5,700 to 7,500 feet. The average annual precipitation is 12to 16 inches, the average annual air temperature is ilkto 44 degrees F, and the average frost -free period is to 95 days. Typically, the surface layer is dark grayish brown loam about 15 inches thick. The upper 17 inches of the substratum is stratified loam and silt loam. The lower part to a depth of 60 inches is stratified loam and clay loam. Included in this unit are small areas of Yeljack, Callings, and Southace soils. Included areas make up about 15 percent of the total acreage. Permeability is moderate in the Jodero soil. Available water capacity also is moderate. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. Runoff is slow or medium, and the hazard of water erosion is slight to severe on the steeper slopes. This unit is used as hayland or pasture. It is well suited to hay and pasture. If properly managed, it can produce 2 tons of irrigated grass hay per acre annually. If this unit is used for homesite development, the main limitations are the moderate frost action potential and the slope in the steeper areas. Buildings and roads =should be designed to offset the limited ability of the ipko,,,40oil to support a load. If the density of housing is _111oderate or high, community sewage systems are :4Oeded to prevent the contamination of water supplies 1e_sulting from seepage from onsite sewage disposal tems. This map unit is in capability subclass IVe, irrigated nonirrigated. It is in the Mountain Swale range site. 53 69—Kilgore silt loam. This deep, poorly drained soil is on alluvial valley floors, flood plains, low terraces, and alluvial fans. It formed in alluvium derived dominantly from mixed sources. Elevation is 6,000 to 9,800 feet. The average annual precipitation is 18 to 20 inches, the average annual air temperature is 38 to 40 degrees F. and the average frost -free period is 70 to 95 days. Typically, the surface layer is very dark grayish brown silt loam about 4 inches thick. The upper 21 inches of the substratum is silt loam. The next 4 inches is very gravelly sandy loam. The lower part to a depth of 60 inches is very gravelly loamy sand. Included in this unit are small areas of Atencio, Azeltine, Showalter, Morval, and Empedrado soils. Included areas make up about 10 percent of the total acreage. Permeability is moderately slow in the Kilgore soil. Available water capacity is low. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. Runoff is slow, and the hazard of water erosion is slight or moderate on the steeper slopes. A high water table is at a depth of 1 to 3 feet. The soil is occasionally flooded for very brief periods in spring and summer. This unit is used as hayland, pasture, or rangeland. It is well suited to hay and pasture. Wetness limits the choice of suitable forage plants and the period of cutting or grazing and increases the risk of winterkill. Grazing when the soil is wet results in compaction of the surface layer, poor tilth, and excessive runoff. Applications of nitrogen fertilizer improve the growth of forage plants. If properly managed, the unit can produce 3.5 tons of irrigated grass hay per acre annually. The potential plant community on this unit is mainly tufted hairgrass, Nebraska sedge, slender wheatgrass, ovalhead sedge, and willow. Other plants that characterize this site are western yarrow, Rocky Mountain iris, and shrubby cinquefoil. The average annual production of air-dry vegetation is about 3,000 pounds per acre. If the range condition deteriorates, willow, iris, and shrubby cinquefoil increase in abundance. If the condition of the range further deteriorates, Kentucky bluegrass and Canada thistle increase in abundance. This unit is poorly suited to homesite development. The main limitations are seepage, the wetness, the frost action potential, and the flooding. A drainage system is needed if roads and building foundations are constructed. This map unit is in capability subclass Vw, irrigated and nonirrigated. It is in the Mountain Meadow range site. Aspen -Gypsum Area, Colorado III loam. The lower 4 inches is loam. The substratum to a depth of 60 inches or more is loam. The soil is noncalcareous to a depth of 19 inches. Included in this unit are small areas of Tridell and Showalter soils. Included areas make up about 15 percent of the total acreage. Permeability is moderate in the Morval soil. Available water capacity also is moderate. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. Runoff is medium, and the hazard of water erosion is moderate. This unit is used as rangeland. The potential plant community is mainly needleandthread, western wheatgrass, muttongrass, prairie junegrass, and big sagebrush. Other plants that characterize this site are bluebunch wheatgrass and mountain muhly. The average annual production of air-dry vegetation is about 1,500 pounds per acre. If the range condition deteriorates, cheatgrass and Kentucky bluegrass increase in abundance. This unit is poorly suited to homesite development. The main limitations are the shrink -swell potential and the slope. This map unit is in capability subclass Vle, nonirrigated. It is in the Deep Loam range site. 1116—Morval loam, 25 to 40 percent slopes. This deep, well drained soil is on alluvial fans. It formed in alluvium derived dominantly from basalt. Elevation is 6,800 to 8,000 feet. The average annual precipitation is 14 to 16 inches, the average annual air temperature is 42 to 44 degrees F, and the average frost -free period is 85 to 95 days. Typically, the surface layer is brown loam about 7 inches thick. The upper 12 inches of the subsoil is clay loam. The lower 4 inches is loam. The substratum to a depth of 60 inches or more is loam. The soil is noncalcareous to a depth of 19 inches. Included in this unit are small areas of Tridell and Showalter soils. Included areas make up about 15 percent of the total acreage. Permeability is moderate in the Morval soil. Available water capacity also is moderate. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. Runoff is rapid, and the hazard of water erosion is moderate or severe. This unit is used as rangeland. The potential plant community is mainly needleandthread, western wheatgrass, muttongrass, prairie junegrass, and big sagebrush. Other plants that characterize this site are bluebunch wheatgrass and mountain muhly. The 0terage annual production of air-dry vegetation is about 0 pounds per acre. If the range condition riorates, cheatgrass and Kentucky bluegrass increase in abundance. 61 This unit is poorly suited to homesite development. The main limitation is the slope. This map unit is in capability subclass Vile, nonirrigated. It is in the Deep Loam range site. 87—Morval-Tridell complex, 12 to 50 percent slopes. This map unit is on alluvial fans and mountainsides. Elevation is 6,800 to 8,000 feet. The average annual precipitation is 14 to 16 inches, the average annual air temperature is 42 to 44 degrees F, and the average frost -free period is 85 to 95 days. This unit is about 55 percent Morval loam and 30 percent Tridell moderately stony loam. The Morva! soil is in slightly concave areas, and the Tridell soil is in convex areas. Included in this unit are small areas of Showalter very stony loam and small areas of Rock outcrop. Included areas make up about 15 percent of the total acreage. The Morval soil is deep and well drained. It formed in alluvium derived dominantly from basalt. Slope is 12 to 40 percent. Typically. the surface layer is brown :cam about 7 inches thick. The upper 12 inches of the si.bsoil is clay loam. The lower 4 inches is loam. The substratum to a depth of 60 inches is loam. The soil is noncalcareous to a depth of 19 inches. Permeability is moderate in the Morval soil. Available water capacity also is moderate. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. Runoff is medium, and the hazard of water erosion is moderate. The Trideil soil is deep and somewhat excessively drained. It formed in alluvium and colluvium derived dominantly from basalt. Slope is 12 to 50 percent. Typically, the upper part of the surface layer is grayish brown stony sandy loam about 2 inches thick. The lower part is very cobbly fine sandy loam about 7 inches thick. The upper 5 inches of the substratum is very cobbly fine sandy loam. The next 11 inches is cobbly sandy loam. Below this is 12 inches of very stony fine sandy loam. The lower part of the substratum to a depth of 60 inches is very stony loamy sand. Permeability is moderately rapid in the Tridell soil. Available water capacity is low. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. Runoff is rapid, and the hazard of water erosion is high. This unit is used as rangeland or for firewood production. The potential plant community on the Morval soil is mainly needleandthread, western wheatgrass, muttongrass, prairie junegrass, and big sagebrush. The average annual production of air-dry vegetation is about 1,500 pounds per acre. The potential plant community on the Tridell soil is 4 • Soil Survey iroughout the year. This soil is subject to rare flooding f brief duration. Ice jams may cause flooding during rolonged cold periods in winter. This unit is used for irrigated hay and pasture or as iildlife habitat. It is well suited to hay and pasture. The lain limitations are the restricted rooting depth for lants that are not water -tolerant and a short growing eason. The wetness limits the choice of suitable forage -Tants and the period of cutting or grazing and ncreases the risk of winterkill. Irrigation water can be applied by furrow, border, corrugation, and sprinkler nethods. This unit provides food and cover for waterfowl and )they wetland wildlife. This unit is poorly suited to homesite development. The main limitations are the wetness and the hazard of -looding. This map unit is in capability subclass IVw, irrigated and nonirrigated. It is in the Riverbottom range site. 93—Rogert very stony sandy loam, 25 to 65 Percent slopes. This shallow, well drained soil is on mou ainsides. It formed in residuum derived do ntly from granite. Elevation is 7,500 to 9,500 feet. ne average annual precipitation is 18 to 20 Inches, the average annual air temperature is 36 to 38 degrees F, and the average frost -free period is 35 to 60 days. Typically, the upper part of the surface layer is dark grayish brown very stony sandy loam about 6 inches thick. The lower part is brown very gravelly sandy loam about 11 inches thick. Hard granite is at a depth of 10 to 20 inches. The soil is noncalcareous throughout. Included in this unit are small areas of soils that are similar to the Rogert soil but are finer textured and deeper over granite bedrock. Also included are small areas of soils that are similar to the Rogert soil but have a lighter colored surface layer. Included areas make up about 15 percent of the total acreage. Permeability is moderately rapid or rapid in the Rogert soil. Available water capacity is very low. The effective rooting depth is 10 to 20 inches. Runoff is medium, and the hazard of water erosion is moderate. This unit is used for livestock grazing or wildlife habitat. The potential plant community is mainly western wheatgrass, bluebunch wheatgrass, prairie junegrass, and mountain big sagebrush. Other plants that characterize this site are needleandthread, Indian ri ss, Idaho fescue, and small numbers of many fo Some areas of aspen are also included. The average annual production of air-dry vegetation is about 1,000 pounds per acre. The suitability of this unit for range seeding is poor. The main limitations are the slope and the surface stoniness. Suitable management practices include proper range use, deferred grazing, and rotation grazing. Aerial spraying is suitable for brush management. This unit is poorly suited to homesite development. The main limitations are the slope and the depth to bedrock. This map unit is in capability subclass Vile, nonirrigated. It is in the Rocky Loam range site. 94—Showalter-Morval complex, 5 to 15 percent slopes. This map unit is on alluvial fans, high terraces. and valley sides. Elevation is 7,000 to 8,500 feet. The average annual precipitation is 14 to 16 inches, the average annual air temperature is 42 to 44 degrees F, and the average frost -free period is 80 to 90 days. This unit is about 45 percent Showalter very stony i loam and 35 percent Morval loam. The Showalter soil is in convex areas, and the Morval soil is in the more concave areas. Included in this unit are small areas of soils that are similar to the Morval soil but have a thicker surface layer. Also included are small areas of soils that are similar to the Morval soil but have 30 to 40 percent cobbles in the substratum. Included areas make up about 20 percent of the total acreage. The Showalter soil is deep and well drained. It formed in alluvium derived dominantly from basalt. About 10 to 15 percent of the surface is covered with stones, 5 percent with cobbles. and 5 percent with gravel. Typically, the surface layer is brown very stony loam about 8 inches thick. The upper 3 inches of the subsoil is very cobbly clay loam. The lower 28 inches is very cobbly clay. The substratum to a depth of 60 inches or more is very cobbly clay loam. Permeability is slow in the Showalter soil. Available water capacity is moderate. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. Runoff is medium, and the hazard of water erosion is slight. The Morval soil is deep and well drained. It formed in alluvium derived dominantly from basalt. Typically, the surface layer is brown loam about 7 inches thick. The upper 12 inches of the subsoil is clay loam. The lower 4 inches is loam. The substratum to a depth of 60 inches is loam. The soil is noncalcareous to a depth of 19 inches and calcareous below that depth. Permeability is moderate in the Morval soil. Available water capacity also is moderate. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. Runoff is medium, and the hazard of water erosion is slight. This unit is used as hayland or rangeland, for crops, or for homesite development. It is moderately suited to hay and crops. The main limitations are the surface stoniness, the slope, and the slow permeability. t Aspen -Gypsum Area, Colorado 65 Grs and legumes grow well if adequate fertilizer is used. Limiting tillage for seedbed preparation and controlling weeds help to control runoff and erosion. If croperly managed, the unit can produce 3 tons of irrigated grass hay or 60 bushels of barley per acre annually. The potential plant community on the Showalter soil is mainly bluebunch wheatgrass, western wheatgrass, prairie junegrass, Indian ricegrass, true mountainmahogany, antelope bitterbrush, Saskatoon serviceberry, and big sagebrush. The average annual production of air-dry vegetation is about 900 pounds per acre. The potential plant community on the Morval soil is mainly needleandthread, western wheatgrass, muttongrass, prairie junegrass, and big sagebrush. The average annual production of air-dry vegetation is about 1,500 pounds per acre. The main limitation for range seeding or mechanical treatment is the surface stoniness in areas of the Showalter soil. Range seeding generally is restricted to broadcasting because of this limitation. This unit is poorly suited to homesite development. The main limitations are the shrink -swell potential and the stones throughout the profile. map unit is in capability subclass Vle, irrigated an .ionirrigated. The Showalter soil is in the Loamy Slopes range site, and the Morval soil is in the Deep Loam range site. 95—Showalter-Morval complex, 15 to 25 percent slopes. This map unit is on alluvial fans, high terraces, and valley sides (fig. 7). Elevation is 7,000 to 8,500 feet. The average annual precipitation is 14 to 16 inches, the average annual air temperature is 42 to 44 degrees F, and the average frost -free period is 80 to 90 days. This unit is about 45 percent Showalter very stony loam and 35 percent Morval loam. The Showalter soil is in convex areas, and the Morval soil is in the more concave areas. Included in this unit are small areas of soils that are similar to the Morval soil but have 30 to 50 percent cobbles in the substratum. Included areas make up about 20 percent of the total acreage. The Showalter soil is deep and well drained. R formed in alluvium derived dominantly from basalt. About 10 to 15 percent of the surface is covered with stones, 5 percent with cobbles, and 5 percent with • gravel. Typically, the surface layer is brown very stony about 8 inches thick. The upper 3 inches of the oil is very cobbly clay loam. The lower 28 inches is very cobbly clay. The substratum to a depth of 60 •hes or more is very cobbly clay loam. Permeability is slow in the Showalter soil. Available water capacity is moderate. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. Runoff is medium, and the hazard of water erosion is moderate. The Morval soil is deep and well drained. It formed in alluvium derived dominantly from basalt. Typically, the surface layer is brown loam about 7 inches thick. The upper 12 inches of the subsoil is clay loam. The lower 4 inches is loam. The substratum to a depth of 60 inches is loam. The soil is noncalcareous to a depth of 19 inches and calcareous below that depth. Permeability is moderate in the Morval soil. Available water capacity also is moderate. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. Runoff is medium, and the hazard of water erosion is slight. This unit is used as rangeland or hayland or for homesite development. The potential plant community on the Showalter soil is mainly bluebunch wheatgrass, western wheatgrass, prairie junegrass, Indian ricegrass, true mountainmahogany, antelope bitterbrush, Saskatoon serviceberry. and big sagebrush. The average annual production of air-dry vegetation is about 900 pounds per acre. The potential plant community on the Morval soil is mainly needleandthread. western wheatgrass, muttongrass, prairie junegrass, and big sagebrush. The average annual production of air-dry vegetation is about 1,500 pounds per acre. The main limitation for range seeding or mechanical treatment is the surface stoniness in areas of the Showalter soil. Suitable management practices include proper range use, deferred grazing, and rotation grazing. Aerial spraying is suitable for brush management. If this unit is used for hay and pasture, the main limitations are the surface stoniness, the slope, and the slow permeability in the Showalter soil. Grasses and legumes grow well if adequate fertilizer is used. This unit is very poorly suited to homesite development. The main limitations are the slope, the shrink -swell potential, and the stones throughout the profile. This map unit is in capability subclass Vle, nonirrigated. The Showalter soil is in the Loamy Slopes range site, and the Morval soil is in the Deep Loam range site. 96—Southace cobbly sandy loam, 1 to 6 percent slopes. This deep, well drained soil is on upland terraces, mountainsides, and alluvial fans. It formed in alluvium derived dominantly from redbed sandstone and shale intermixed with gypsiferous material. Elevation is 6,000 to 7,000 feet. The average annual precipitation is 1* TABLE 13. --BUILDING SITE DEVELOPMENT --Continued Soil name and I map symbol 1 Shallow excavations Soil Survey i I I I Dwellings I Dwellings I Small I Local roads I Lawns and without I with I commercial I and streets I landscaping basements I basements I buildings 1 I X34 Empedrado !Slight X35 !Moderate: Empedrado I slope. 36 (Severe: Empedrado I slope. 37 ISevere: Etoe I slope. 38 (Slight --- Evanston 39, 40, 41 ;Severe: Evanston I slope. I 42* 'Severe: Severe: 'Severe: :Severe: Severe: 'Severe: Faquents I cutbanks cave,! flooding, I flooding, I flooding, wetness, I wetness. I wetness. 1 wetness. I wetness. : wetness. flooding, I I I I frost action. I I 1 I I 43*: I I I I I \ Forelle (Moderate: (Moderate: 'Moderate: ISevere: Moderate: (Moderate: I slope. 1 slope. I slope. I slope. slope. I large stones, I I I slope. I I I I Brownsto (Severe: (Moderate: 'Moderate: 'Severe: Moderate: (Moderate: I cutbanks cave. slope. I slope. ! slope. slope. I small stones, I I I I I droughty, I ! I I slope. I I I I 44*: I I I I I Forelle !Severe: Severe: 'Severe: 'Severe: Severe: ISevere: I slope. I slope. I slope. I slope. slope. I slope. I I I I I Brownsto (Severe: (Severe: 'Severe: 'Severe: Severe: 'Severe: I cutbanks cave, slope. I slope. I slope. slope. I slope. 1 slope. I I I I I 1 45 (Moderate: Moderate: !Moderate: 'Moderate: Moderate: (Severe: Forsey I large stones. I large stones. I large stones. I slope, frost action, I large stones. I ! I I large stones. large stones. I I I I I 46, 47 'Severe: Severe: 'Severe: (Severe: Severe: 'Severe: Forsey I slope. I slope. I slope. I slope. slope. I large stones, ( I I I I slope.. I I I I 48 (Moderate: Severe: (Severe: (Severe: Severe: (Moderate: Fughes I too clayey. I shrink -swell. I shrink -swell. 1 shrink -swell. shrink -swell, I large stones. I I 1 1 low strength. I I 1 I I I 41111, 'Slight- I Slight (Moderate: Slight ISlight. �in I I I 1 slope. I I I I I 50 (Severe: 'Severe: (Severe: (Severe: Severe: (Severe: Goslin I slope. I slope. I slope. I slope. slope. I slope. I I I I I I I I Slight (Slight (Moderate: I slope. I I Moderate: (Moderate: !Severe: slope. I slope. ' slope. I I I I Severe: 'Severe: (Severe: slope. I slope. I slope. I I Severe: ISevere: 'Severe: slope. I slope. I slope. I I Slight !Slight !Slight i I Severe: 'Severe: 'Severe: slope. I slope. slope. Moderate: 'Moderate: frost action. I large stones. Moderate: !Moderate: slope, I large stones, frost action. I slope. Severe: 'Severe: slope. I slope. Severe: (Severe: slope. I slope. Slight ISlight. Severe: 'Severe: slope. I slope. See footnote at end of table. • 196 Soil Survey TABLE 10. --BUILDING SITE DEVELOPMENT --Continued I I I I I Soil name and I Shallow I Dwellings Dwellings I Small 1 Local roads I Lawns and map symbol I excavations I without with I commercial I and streets I landscaping I 1 basements basements I buildings '•I I I I 1 I ' 1 1 1 1 I 69 'Severe: 'Severe: Severe: 'Severe: (Severe: 'Moderate: Kilgore I cutbanks cave,' flooding, flooding, I flooding, I flooding. I wetness, I wetness. I wetness. wetness. I wetness. I I flooding. I 1 1 1 I 70 'Moderate: (Severe: Severe: (Severe: (Severe: (Slight. Kobar I too clayey. I shrink -swell. shrink -swell. I shrink -swell. I shrink -swell, I I I 1 I low strength. I I I 1 I I 71 (Moderate: ISevere: Severe: (Severe: 'Severe: 'Moderate: Kobar I too clayey, I shrink -swell. shrink -swell. I shrink -swell, I shrink -swell, I slope. I slope. I I slope. I low strength. I I I 1 I I 72 (Severe: 'Severe: Severe: ISevere: (Severe: 'Severe: Kobar I slope. I shrink -swell, slope, I shrink -swell, I shrink -swell, I slope. 1 I slope. shrink -swell. ; slope. I low streng_:r, I I I , I slope. I I I I I I 73 'Moderate: 'Severe: Severe: (Severe: ISevere: 'Moderate: KoI I too clayey, I shrink -swell. 'shrink -swell. I shrink -swell, I shrink -swell, I slope. ( slope. I I slope. I low streng_-:. I I I 1 1 I 74 (Moderate: (Moderate: Moderate: (Severe: (Moderate: (Moderate: Leavittville I slope. 1 slope. slope. I slope. I slope. I slope. I I I I I 75 (Severe: 'Severe: Severe: 'Severe: (Severe: (Severe: Millerlake I slope. I slope. slope. slope. 1 slope. I slope. I I I I I 76, 77 (Severe: ISevere: Severe: (Severe: ISevere: 'Severe: Mine I slope. I slope. slope. I slope. I slope. I slope. I I 1 1 I 78 ISevere: ISevere: Severe: ISevere: 'Severe: ISevere: Miracle 1 depth to rock,' slope. depth to rock,' slope. I slope. I slope. I slope. I slope. I I I I I I I I 79 ISevere: (Moderate: Severe: 'Moderate: (Moderate: 'Moderate: Moen I depth to rock.' shrink -swell, depth to rock.1 shrink -swell, 1 depth to rock,' small stones, 1 I depth to rock. I depth to rock.) low strength. I thin layer. I I 1 I I 80 ISevere: (Moderate: Severe: ISevere: (Moderate: (Moderate: Moen 1 depth to rock.1 shrink -swell, depth to rock.' slope. I depth to rock,' small stones, I I slope, I I low strength, I slope. I I depth to rock. I I slope. I I I 1 1 I 81 ISevere: ISevere: Severe: 'Severe: ISevere: 'Severe: Moen I depth to rock,' slope. depth to rock,' slope. I slope. I slope. I slope. I slope. I I I I I I I I 82, 83 ISevere: 'Severe: Severe: ISevere: ISevere: ISevere: Monad I slope. I slope. slope. I slope. I slope. I slope. I I I I I 84 'Slight--- 'Moderate: Moderate: 'Moderate: IModerate: (Slight. I I shrink -swell. shrink -swell. I shrink -swell. 1 low strength, I I I 1 I frost action. I I 1 I I I 85, 86 ISevere: ISevere: Severe: ISevere: ISevere: ISevere: Morval I slope. I slope. slope. I slope. 1 slope. I slope. I I I I I t87*: I I I I I Morval ISevere: ISevere: Severe: ISevere: ISevere: ISevere: I slope. I slope. slope. I slope. I slope. I slope. I I I I I Morval See footnote at end of table. '4.: Aspen -Gypsum Area, Colorado 197 TABLE 10. --BUILDING SITE DEVELOPMENT --Continued Soil name and map symbol Shallow excavations Dwellings without I basements Dwellings with basements Small commercial buildings Local roads and streets I Lawns and I landscaping 87*: Tridell 88*: Moyerson Rock outcrop. 89 Mussel 90 Mussel 91 •��95*: Showalter Mussel 92 93 edrob Rogert 94*: Showalter Morval Severe: (Severe: cutbanks cave,1 slope. slope. 1 Severe: ;Severe: depth to rock,1 shrink -swell, slope. I slope. Morval 96 Severe: !Slight cutbanks cave.I Severe: [Moderate: cutbanks cave.! slope. Southace 97 Severe: cutbanks cave, slope. Severe: slope. Severe: 'Severe: cutbanks cave,'. flooding. wetness. Southace 98, 99 Severe: depth to rock, slope. Southace Moderate: too clayey, large stones, slope. Moderate: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Moderate: large stones. Moderate: large stones, slope. Severe: slope. See footnote at end of table. (Severe: slope, ; depth to rock. Moderate: i shrink -swell, ! slope, large stones. ( (Moderate: I shrink -swell, I slope. (Severe: I slope. (Severe: I slope. (Moderate: I large stones. (Moderate: I slope, I large stones. (Severe: I slope. Severe: slope. Severe: Severe: slope. Severe: depth to rock, shrink -swell, slope, 1 slope. shrink -swell. 1 Slight Moderate: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: flooding, wetness. Slight Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: flooding. Severe: slope. Severe: -ow strength, slope, shrink -swell. (Severe: I slope. ;Severe: I slope, I thin layer. Moderate: !Slight. frost action. I Moderate: (Moderate: slope, 1 slope. frost action. I Severe: -Lope. :Moderate: wetness, flooding. Severe: slop_. ;Moderate: 1 wetness. Severe: (Severe: '.Severe: Severe: depth to rock, slope, , depth to rock,small stones, slope. I depth to rock.' slope. slope. Moderate: (Severe: slope, I slope. large stones. Moderate: slope, shrink -swell. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Moderate: large stones. Moderate: slope, large stones. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: !Severe: slope. I slope. Moderate: !Moderate: large stones. 1 large stones. 1 Severe: {Moderate: slope. ! slope, ! large stones. (Severe: !Severe: I slope. 1 slope. Moderate: Severe: • slope, i large stones. frost action, shrink -swell. :Moderate: I low strength, I slope, I frost action. (Severe: I slope. a!s Moderate: slope. Severe: large stones, slope. Severe: slope. Severe: droughty. Severe: droughty. Severe: droughty, slope. • TABLE 11. --SANITARY FACILITIES --Continued Soil name and map symbol 1 Septic tank I Sewage lagoon 1 Trench absorption I areas I sanitary fields 1 1 landfill Area sanitary landfill I Daily cover 1 for landfill 29*, 30*: Rock outcrop. I 1 1 31 Severe: 'Severe: Dotsero 1 slope. 1 seepage, I slope. I I 32 (Slight (Severe: Dotsero 1 1 seepage. I I 33*: 1 I Earsman (Severe: (Severe: depth to rock, I seepage, slope. I depth to rock, slope. 1 Slight ,Severe: seepage. Moderate: 'Severe: n edrado 1 slope. I seepage, I slope. I I 35 (Severe: (Severe: Empedrado 1 slope. I seepage, I slope. 1 37 Severe: (Severe: Etoe 1 slope. I slope. I I t I 38 Moderate: 'Moderate: Evanston I percs slowly. 1 seepage, I slope. 39, 40, 41 Severe: (Severe: Evanston 1 slope. 1 slope. 1 42* Severe: (Severe: Fluvaquents 1 flooding, 1 seepage, I wetness, I flooding. I poor filter. 1 A43*:I 1 Forelle Moderate: (Severe: I percs slowly, I slope. I slope. 1 Brownsto (Moderate: 'Severe: I slope. 1 seepage, I slope. I I I I elle Severe: 'Severe: I slope. I slope. 1 Brownsto 'Severe: (Severe: Rock outcrop. +34 Empedrado slope. I seepage, 1 slope. See footnote at end of table. Severe: seepage, slope. Severe: seepage. Severe: depth to rock, slope. 'Severe: seepage. Severe: seepage. Severe: seepage, slope. Severe: seepage. Severe: depth to rock, slope. Severe: seepage. Severe: seepage. Severe: Severe: seepage, 1 seepage, slope. I slope. Severe: Severe: slope, ( slope. large stones. Slight Slight Severe: Severe: slope. 1 slope. Severe: Severe: flooding, 1 flooding, seepage, I seepage, wetness. I wetness. Moderate: Moderate: slope. 1 slope. Moderate: Moderate: slope, 1 slope. too sandy. Severe: Severe: slope. 1 slope. Severe: Severe: slope. 1 slope. Poor: slope. Fair: small stones. Poor: area reclaim, small stones, slope. Fair: small stones. Fair: small stones, slope. Poor: slope. Poor: large stones, slope. Good. Poor: slope. Poor: seepage, too sandy, small stones. Fair: slope. Poor: small stones. Poor: slope. Poor: small stones, slope. R • TABLE 11. --SANITARY FACILITIES --Continued I 1 I Soil name and I Septic tank 1 Sewage lagoon Trench I Area map symbol I absorption 1 areas sanitary I sanitary 1 fields 1 landfill I landfill Daily cover for landfill I 1 I I I I I I 65*: I 1 1 I Jerry ISevere: (Moderate: Severe: 'Slight 'Poor: I percs slowly. I seepage, 1 too clayey. 1 I too clayey, I 1 slope. I i hard to pack, I I I I I small stones. I I 1 I I Millerlake (Severe: (Moderate: (Moderate: 'Slight !Fair: I percs slowly. I seepage, 1 too clayey. I I too clayey. I I slope. 1 I I I I 1 I 66*, 67*: I 1 1 I 1 Jerry !Severe: 'Severe: ISevere: (Severe: 1?oor: I percs slowly, I slope. I slope, I slope. I too clayey, 1 slope. I 1 too clayey. I I hard to pack, I I 1 I small stones. I 1 I Millerlake ISevere: !Severe: Severe: 'Severe: ?oor: I percs slowly, I slope. slope. I slope. slope. I slope. I I I I I 68 'Moderate: 'Moderate: iSlight IS__.;..t Good. .deco I percs slowly. I seepage, I 1 I 1 slope. 1 I I I I I 69 'Severe: 'Severe: ;Severe: 'Severe: ;Poor: VV Kilgore 1 flooding, I seepage, 1 flooding, I flooding, I seepage, I wetness, I flooding, ' seepage, I seepage, too sandy, I peres slowly. I wetness. i wetness. I wetness. ' small stones. I I I 70 !Severe: (Moderate: ;Slight 151_,..1 Good. Kobar I percs slowly. I slope. 1 1 I I I 1 I 71 !Severe: (Severe: 'Moderate: [Moderate: ;Fair: Kobar I percs slowly. I slope. I slope. I slope. slope. I 1 1 I I 72 'Severe: (Severe: (Severe: 'Severe: I?oor: Kobar I percs slowly, I slope. I slope. I slope. I slope. 1 slope. I I I 1 1 I I I I 73 (Severe: (Severe: (Moderate: 'Moderate: 'Fair: Kobar I percs slowly. I slope. 1 slope. 1 slope. I slope. 1 I I I I 74 (Moderate: (Severe: (Severe: 'Moderate: !Fair: Leavittville I depth to rock, 1 slope. I depth to rock. I depth to rock, I area reclaim, ( percs slowly, I 1 I slope. I small stones, 1 slope. I 1 I I slope. I ( I I 75 (Severe: (Severe: (Severe: (Severe: ;Poor: Millerlake I percs slowly, I slope. I slope. I slope. I slope. I slope. I I I I 1 1 I I I 76, 77 'Severe: 'Severe: (Severe: 'Severe: (Poor: Mine I poor filter, I seepage, I seepage, I seepage, I small stones, 1 slope. I slope. I slope. I slope. I slope. I 1 1 I I !Severe: 'Severe: (Severe: 'Severe: 'poor: Miracle I depth to rock, I depth to rock, I depth to rock, I depth to rock, I area reclaim, I slope. I slope. I slope. I slope. I slope. I I 1 I I 79 ISevere: (Severe: (Severe: 'Severe: 'Poor: Moen I depth to rock. I depth to rock. I depth to rock. I depth to rock. I area reclaim. I 1 I I I See footnote at end of table. aper -Gypsum Area, Colorado 207 • TABLE 11. --SANITARY FACILITIES --Continued Soil name and 1 map symbol Septic tank absorption fields Sewage lagoon areas Trench sanitary landfill Area sanitary landfill 1 1 Daily cover 1 for landfill oen pen , 83 Gonad Orval 86 Norval -!orval rridell 1 9*: yoyerson Rock outcrop. 9 Severe: depth to rock. Mussel 0 Severe: depth to rock, slope. Mussel Severe: percs slowly, slope. Mussel 32 Moderate: percs slowly. Redrob 93 Severe: slope. Rogert 94*: Showalter • Severe: slope. Severe: poor filter, slope. Severe: depth to rock, slope. Moderate: percs slowly. Moderate: pesos slowly, slope. Severe: slope. Severe: wetness, poor filter. Severe: depth to rock, slope. Severe: percs slowly. See footnote at end of table. Severe: depth to rock, slope. Severe: depth to rock, slope. Severe: seepage, slope. Moderate: seepage, slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: seepage, slope, large stones. Severe: depth to rock, slope. Moderate: seepage, slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: seepage, flooding, wetness. Severe: seepage, depth to rock, slope. Severe: slope, large stones. Severe: Severe: depth to rock. 1 depth to rock. Severe: depth to rock, slope. Severe: slope. Moderate: too clayey. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope, large stones. Severe: depth to rock, slope. Slight Moderate: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: seepage, wetness, too sandy. Severe: depth to rock, seepage, slope. Severe: large stones. Severe: depth to rock, slope. Severe: seepage, slope. Slight Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: depth to rock, slope. Slight 1 !Poor: 1 area reclaim. 1Poor: 1 area reclaim, 1 slope. 1 1Poor: 1 slope. 1 Moderate: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: seepage, wetness. Severe: depth to rock, seepage, slope. Moderate: slope. 1 (Fair: I too clayey, I small stones. 1 1Poor: I slope. 1 'Poor: I slope. (Poor: I slope. 1Poor: 1 area reclaim, I hard to pack, I slope. IGood. (Fair: I slope. 1 (Poor: 1 slope. 1Poor: I seepage, 1 too sandy, I small stones. 1 1Poor: 1 depth to rock, 1 seepage, 1 small stones. 1 1Poor: 1 small stones. 1 1 • ' 208 TABLE 11. --SANITARY FACILITIES --Continued Soil Surve Soil name and map symbol Septic tank absorption fields Sewage lagoon I areas Trench sanitary landfill Area sanitary landfill 1 Daily cover for landfill )494*: Morval 'Moderate: I percs slowly, I slope. 'Severe: I percs slowly, I slope. 'Severe: I slope. !Moderate: I large stones. 'Moderate: I slope, I large stones. 'Severe: I slope. --'Severe: I depth to rock. 1Severe: I depth to rock. --ISevere: I depth to rock, I percs slowly. Pinelli •----ISevere: I percs slowly. 'Severe: I depth to rock, I percs slowly. Pinelli 'Severe: I percs slowly. ISevere: 1 depth to rock, I percs slowly, I slope. 1 A95*: Showalter Morval 96 Southace 97 Southace 98, 99 Southace 100*: Starley Starman 101*: Tanna 102*: Tanna 103*: Tanna Severe: slope. Severe: slope, large stones. See footnote at end of table. Severe: slope. Severe: seepage, large stones. Severe: seepage, slope, large stones. Severe: seepage, slope, large stones. Severe: depth to rock, slope. Severe: depth to rock, slope. Severe: depth to rock. Moderate: slope. Severe: depth to rock, slope. Severe: slope. Moderate: 'Moderate: slope, I slope. too clayey. Severe: (Severe: slope, I slope. large stones. I Severe: (Severe: slope. I slope. Severe: 'Slight Severe: depth to rock, slope. large stones. I Severe: large stones. Severe: slope, large stones. MModerate: I slope. 'Severe: I slope. Severe: 'Severe: depth to rock. I depth to rock. Severe: 'Severe: depth to rock. I depth to rock. Severe: 'Slight depth to rock. I Slight 'Slight Severe: (Moderate: depth to rock. I slope. Moderate: (Moderate: slope. I slope. Severe: 'Severe: depth to rock, I slope. slope. Fair: too clayey, small stones, slope. Poor: small stones, slope. Poor: slope. Poor: small stones. Poor: small stones. Poor: small stones, slope. Poor: depth to rock, small stones. Poor: depth to rock. Poor: depth to rock Good. Poor: depth to rock Fair: slope. Poor: depth to roc' slope. 1540 FEA1Ukth -L:unLi 1UeU 0 O n 0 4 4 0 U W 0 x n M a • L T 3 0) o - x 4) 4 4) o 3 0 Moderate. Moderate. T 3 3 3 3 T 3 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 3 O Soil Survey 3 O a 41 L ro 4 0 O Moderate t 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 - .0 .0 .0 .0 L - -C 0) 0+ Cr. 0' 0, 0, 0.. 0,0' -.4 .4 -i -. -4 -4 -44 ..1 -.i x x x x x x = x x Moderate L rn CI-1 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 I 0 4) 4) L L 4-) ro RI ro 4 4 4 4) 4) 4) •0 b b o 0 0 x E s I I 1 1 1 1 0) 4) N 4-1 ro ro 44 4 4) a) 0 b o 0 Z 3 3 O 3 O a) .. ro 4 4) 'O 0 E 3 3 3 o 0 0 a a a 4) .) 4 O •0 O E 3 O -) 1 1 1 1 1 1 4) 41 4) .) MI ro 4 4 4) a) b •0 O O E E 3 O „ 4.) - , W W 4 N N x .) - W 4 0 '0 (11 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 V. V' N O O V' O N O O 0 ID LD ID VD VD 1 1 I ID ID 1 10 1 4.0 k.0 A A A A A 0 0 CO A A 0 A O A A A N N , H 4.) 1 0 0. 4 0)O '0 0 4 >. •--4 0) 0 O 11 ro i1 C r1 0. -4 0 co') 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .) I . [y ll;) lD %D �O lD �D lD ‘O A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A 4) O 0 0 z z z U 01 07 C C C 0 0 0 z z z C C 0 0 0 Z z z G C C 0 O O O O z z z z 0 C C O O 0 Z Z Z W U U U C] 03 01 U 07 ca 0] OI 0] * a r-1 .44 e O 7 44 . G .-4 41 0 .J N 4 ri 4 to 4) . U a) 7 4 0) rU rC 0O r1O 0 •--4 .-I 0 0 • 0 0 N .0 .0 0 •• in . 0 . 7 0. N O N O L . n 4) U . -1 U t 'O ro 04 7 ro O 4 n N 0' 4.) '-4 4) •-I C .0 7 ..-1 a b O u)) 0 N N Rock outcrop. Rock outcrop. v O `Cr C 0 4.) C71 n 4, rl 0 '4 r co W44 See footnote at end of table. -n -Gypsum Area, Colorado 4 7 V 0) a) 4) u 41 0 0 Ua a a — 1 I 1 1 1 1 I1 I I .d 1 1 I 1 L 1 1 1 0 '4) 1 1 4 1 ,.1 0 1 I 1 1 0 1 I 1 4 I I L O a00 '0 01 01 01 '0 01 01 01 c ,i +i -.-1 LI n 0 X x S 2 z x x x I I 1 I I 1 1 1 I 0 4) 4) a) a) ,.) 14 b '0 4 4 4 V as 4) s 01 3 3 0 "0 3 '0 0 ...-s 00 0 0 .07 a X a X Moderate. L s s 0 0 a a a a a x U n 0 G 0 -4 0 4 41 u 4, U o 44 a I n •14 4 0 ro L m 11) 43 10 4 30 0 •3TS 0 0 03 3 0 x a a a a 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 4) 1 1 4 4 1 4 1 .0 I 1 1 I I 4 1 1 1 I 1 1 4) L L O a -.4 o CP 01 _..1 -i x x X x X x X x 0 1 I I 1 1 1 I I 4 1 1 1 4 4 1 4 4 4) 4) 4) 4) 4) 4) 4) a, .o a) N a, a,N ,0 m ro m it14 '4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4b 4) 4) o v OS o 00 b 0 0 £ x z x S E x a, v a1 444 4 W 0 .0 O N O 0 0 O 0 v 0 c O 0 O D O O O 'D 1 lD 1 1 ID ID ID ID G ID lD ID ID ID ID O n O O A A A N H I /I A A A A A A H N N a 4) 4 aI 4 b z 4) 1 4 0. 0. 1 1 1 =L 4) N 0. 4I 1 Ca 0 0 o O 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 O O ID ID ID ID ID ID ID ID 10 .2410 I11 `A `A n n n n n A A A A n A A a N 4) y 1 4-) 41I o z 0 0.1 G N '1 14 o 0 Cu — — U 4) a 4) 4 w Occasional-- C 0 0 z z z c c o O z z c c 0 0 z z 4) 4) z z z c o O z z 4) 0 4) CC c o 0 0 z z z o pp R1 U 0 U U CO CI W CO U 255 • 4) A N 4-1 0 m Brownsto ID 4) 40 n 4 o In w 17 srs n c . 0 .i 0 In .-1 In .c 01 in .0 co Cuorn (D .-I d• v In • n 0 b G .,.i A L .i ,) 1, 0 E0 14 0 .• a 0. v 0 .n (7 (9 r- c In 0 n .a N 0 o n ID 4 ID 0) OI H � In ID r ID .0 c 4) a) .0 4) O 0 0 Lai 4 N -421 cov 0 O ID 7 lD 256 ES --Continued 0 In0 4 14 0 U Concrete 4-4 b O 41 .-1 11 4) .54 44 O u .4 U 43 a x U 0 4 •0 4) 1 A v 4 4) m [ Moderate 4) as 4 v 3 •0 3 3 a° E a° a0 1 I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I t I 1 L .0 L 0` On b1 x x 3 O a Moderate. Moderate o o a Moderate. 3 3 3 o 0 0 a a a I 1 1 1 I I 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I L .0 L L L L 01 01 01 01 01 01 H .-1 -..-I .-1 -.-1 •.1 x x x = x x 3 0 a Moderate Soil Survey Moderate. 3 O a 3 O 41 L R/ 4 41 0 O 4, 47 ets 4 4) .0 O 4) y 4 4) '0 O s 4) u 4 4, 'O O x 4) aJ ro 4 4) 0 O E 3 O a 4, L V 4 4) 0 O x 4) a.) N 4 d 'O O s 3 3 O O a a 41 15 b 1 y b 1 4 4 N 0 1 b .4 I 0 N A y x N L 0. 4) C1 water table Ca. T 5 x F 4 0 z 4 0 U1 0 0• C Cal •0 a 0 4 0 F Cs. O L O E 0 0 0 0 0 ,D 0 0 c v o 0 0 0 0 C I ID , 0 D 1 ID , 1 1 ,D 10 10 ,0 1 \O ,D 1 "0 H A A O A A 0 0 A A A A 0 A A 0 A Q' 04 N .-1 .-1 •0 U N ca C b U 4) G A C 4) 4 ro 0. 0. 4 C 41 4 m 0. 0. 4 0 0 L L f") 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 O 0 0 0 C' 0 0 0.-)I I ID • C3.. 0 10 10 10 :D ,D ID t0 10 10 61 lD ID Iii l0 ID 0 A A A A A A A A A A A A n A •--1 In L L 0 0 E I Frequency 1 Duration Very brief Occasional 4) 0 0 Z 4, 0 O z 0 G O Z Y C O z 4) 4) 4) 4) 4) 4) m C C C 4 C C O O O O A O O z z z z a z z 1 U 0. 0-..0 4 01 O b 0 4 X u m m m U o m m CO CO o m U 03 0 1 t 1 n 41 •-4 •-I 41 C•4 -4 st r > at • N •-1 4 L 4 O .-1 4 -q IT •a r A > ..-1 40 4-4 O% 0 X -4• 4 In : ,D r r r x ., CO m .-I r U o r1 V r a) a m C CO o ...1 -4 .O .0 40 T co X O, X N x r- r- r m ro •• 4 cT co •-4 4) b 8.4 4 F 0 0 4, '4 0o T m Rock outcrop. 01 4 • 4, N a.) 41 • 04, 4 O, M1I 4) s 0 e L tX CA See footnote at end of table. • VEGETATION REPORT • • •19 Beach Environmental, LLC • •n 5' Suite 304 Aspen_ CO 5 t ti I 1 Tel (970) 925-3475 Fax 925-4754 Ron Liston Land Design Partnership 918 Cooper Avenue Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Re: Lake Springs Wetland Evaluation Dear Ron: June 4. 2001 At your request. Beach Environmental, LLC has undertaken and completed an evaluation of the Lake Springs project to determine whether the proposed development plans would impact any jurisdictional wetland area. As explained in more detail below. our findings indicate that based on the development plans provided to us, there will be no impact to any wetland, jurisdictional or not, as a result of the Lake Springs development proposal. Although \,ve inspected all proposed blocks of development. including Blocks 1 through 8, wetlands were found only on Block 8 immediately adjacent to the two existing water storage ponds. The upper pond (upper in elevation) is smaller and supports a very small phreatophytic vegetative community at the water's edge. A spring at the eastern edge of the pond provides water for both the upper and lower ponds and an earthen embankment separates the two ponds. The vegetative community surrounding the upper pond includes sedges. rushes, and juncus at the water's edge. These plants do not occur beyond approximately one foot from the pond's edge. The lower pond appears to be approximately six times the size of the upper pond and has a morning glory outlet at the northeastern corner. Wetland vegetation is found along the shoreline of this pond and varies in distance from the pond edge between one and ten feet. This vegetative zone includes the same Nebraska sedge (Carex nebrascensis), spiked woodrush (Lazu1a spicata), Rocky Mountain uncus (Uncus saximonata) and Creeping spikerush (Eleocharis inacrostaclzya) as well as grasses such as fescue, bluegrass and downy cress. The development proposal for Lake Springs does not call for development within the pond area of Block 8 and therefore should not impact any wetlands during development activities. No other wetlands were located at Lake Springs within any other area of proposed development and the entire parcel was visually inspected. The remainder of the property does not include the proper hydrology, soils or vegetation to support wetland communities. • • • LAKE SPRINGS PROPERTY UPPER POND - DOWNSTREAM EDGE JUNE 2001 13L -\c H f \\ I .\I.. I.L( (0:01 -ado `s1(i1 • • LAKE SPRINGS PROPERTY LOWER POND - SOUTHERN EDGE JUNE 2001 Note sedge border transitioning to sage and rabbit brush 13F- \( H t -N\ R0N\1I-•I.\i.. 11.0 \vren. (,,lorAlo I O I • • LAKE SPRINGS PROPERTY LOWER POND - SOUTHERN EDGE JUNE 2001 Note typical sedge and rush border to pond BEACH ENVIRONMENTAL. EEC Aspen. Colorado 8 1 0 1 1 • LAKE SPRINGS PROPERTY LOWER POND - SOUTHERN EDGE JUNE 2001 Outlet structure 13F.AC'H EN \ IR( )N\IF:N 1 :\1..1.1.( .-Ashen. Colorado ; 10 1 1 • • • LAKE SPRINGS PROPERTY LOWER POND - SOUTHERN EDGE JUNE 2001 Lower Pond 13EA('H ENVIIZE )NMMFN'I AI.. f_L.0 Aspen. Colorado 810 I 1 • BEACH ENVIRONMENTAL, LLC • • Page 2 June 4, 2001 Our study also indicates there will be no impacts to riparian corridors associated with water ways upon the Lake Springs Development. Your proposed lot line setbacks from these areas will allow for protection of existing riparian conditions. Finally, your request for a vegetation/weed inventory will be completed this week and we will provide you with a weed management plan as soon as possible. Should you have any questions or need for additional information, please feel free to contact me directly. 0283a1.01 Sincerely, By Gari Be •h, CES. RWS Principal •19 Beach Environmental. LLC • ell 7 : 5 W. Maw Scare 304 a,;pen. COSI ' Tel (970) 925-3475 Fax 925-4754 June 7, 2001 Ron Liston Land Design Partnership 918 Cooper Avenue Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Re: Lake Spring Ranch Weed ` 1anagement Plan Dear Ron: At your request, we have undertaken and completed a vegetative survey of the Lake Springs Ranch Property, inventoried the noxious weeds and other vegetation upon the 440.733 acre ranch and developed a comprehensive plan for managing the existing noxious weed population. We have also included a map of the property delineating the general area of noxious weeds as well as a plant material list for revegetation and a weed control schedule. All work was completed by professional and technical staff of Beach Environmental and we will be available to answer any questions that various review agencies may have regarding our work. Please feel free to contact me with any questions. 0283a1.02 cc: file Sincerely, • VEGETATION MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR • LAKE SPRINGS RANCH The vegetation management plan for the Lake Springs Ranch is designed to establish and maintain a desirable native plant community while controlling noxious weeds. This management plan is intended to cover all common areas including roadsides, open space, and utility easements. Recommended control measures for weedy species will include cultural, mechanical, chemical, and biological techniques. It is our recommendation that chemical control be limited to the maximum extent possible and only reserved for large outbreaks of noxious weeds. There are a limited number of localized outbreaks primarily in areas that have been disturbed. Site Vegetation Characterization The Lake Springs Ranch is located in Spring Valley in Garfield County and includes 440.733 acres in Sections 32, 33 and 34, Township 6 South, Range 88 West and Section 4, Township 7 South, Range 88 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian. The ranch falls within the Rocky Mountain region of Colorado and ranges in elevation from approximately 6900 feet to 7,310 feet MSL. The Native Plant Vegetation Guide for Colorado authored by the Colorado Department of Natural Resources, State Parks, and the Natural Areas Program was used to vegetatively classify the Lake Springs Ranch, and used to make recommendations for native plantings. Field investigations confirmed the existence of all vegetation described herein. The Lake Springs Ranch can be primarily classified as a sagebrush shrubland. Due to the Lake Springs Ranch's large size and its geographical placement, this property shows vegetation characteristic of a sagebrush community. Natural vegetation on the property includes: Gambel oak, rabbit brush, sagebrush, and native grasses including wheatgrass, junegrass and fescue. DO\1INANT GR:'NIINOIDS ON THE LAKE SPRINGS RANCH Agropyron spicatum Bluebunch wheatgrass Festuca arizonica Arizona fescue Koeleria macrantha prarie junegrass Poa fendleriana muttongrass Pascopyron smithii Western wheatgrass Carex nebrascensis Nebraska sedge DO11N:kNT FORRS ON THE L. -\1:E SPRINGS RANCH Artemesia franseriodes ragweed sagebrush Campanula rotundifolia bluebell bellflower Lake Springs Ranch Vegetation Management Plan Beach Environmental. LLC -1- • DOMINANT TREES & SIIR[ RS ON I'IIF. LAKE SPRINGS RANCH Amelanchier utahensis Utah serviceberry Chrysothamnus nauseosus Rubber rabbitbrush Quercus gambelii Gambel oak Artemesia tridentata big sagebrush Soil Characterization Information about soils is provided by soil surveys from the United States Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service. There are several types of soils found upon the Lake Springs Ranch including Empedrado loam, Showalter-Morval complex, Morval- Tridell complex and Forelle-Brownsto complex. The primary soil type within the development area appears to be the Showalter-Morval complex found on ancient alluvial fans, high terraces and valley sides within Spring Valley with slopes ranging from 15 to 25%. The Showalter soil is generally found in the convex areas while the Morval soil is found in the concave areas. Both are deep and well -drained, though somewhat stoney, and dominantly derived from basalt. This soil unit usually supports rangeland and hayland. The second predominant soil type is Empedrado loam, characterized as a deep and well - drained soil on fans and upland hills. This soil was formed in ancient alluvium and eolian material. Permeability is moderate and available water capacity is high. The Forelle-Brownsto complex soil type characterizes the pasture area north of the lakes. This is a deep -well drained soil found on ancient alluvium derived from sedimentary rocks and basalt. Permeability is moderate and water capacity ranges from high to low. The area to the east of the property also includes the Morval-Tridall complex soil type found on ancient alluvial fans and mountainsides with slopes ranging from 12 to 50%. Both are deep and well drained, though somewhat excessively drained in the Tridall soil, and dominantly derived from basalt. Permeability ranges from moderate to moderately rapid. This soil unit usually supports rangeland and firewood production. Noxious Weed Characterization During the noxious weed survey, Beach Environmental, LLC, noted small outbreaks of weeds located primarily in areas of disturbance. Limited, small communities of Canada thistle, Houndstongue, Hoary Cress, Mustard and a small group of Blue Flax were found on the property. Exhibit 1 denotes the general area of the noxious weeds. The Canadian thistle has approximately 10% density over approximately one to two acres. Within this general area app. 1110th of an acre has been populated by hoary cress while approximately two acres populated by houndstongue. The hoary cress and houndstongue are more concentrated—approximately 50% of the vegetation is hoary cress and 25% houndstongue within the delineated areas. Due to the aggressive nature of these weeds, the vegetation management plan has established guidelines to help control their spread. Lake Springs Ranch Vegetation Management Plan Beach Environmental. LLC - 2 - • • • These guidelines are reproduced from recommendations provided by the Native Plant Revegetation Guide for Colorado, a guide published by Colorado Natural Areas Program, Colorado State Parks, and Colorado Department of Natural Resources, and recommended by Garfield County for planning purposes. Other resources such as the Pitkin County Weed Management Plan, Colorado Weed Management Association, and the internet were used for supplemental information. Canada Thistle (Cirsium al -reuse) Description: This aggressive weed forms large dense patches of prickly plants along the bottoms of intermittent drainages and other areas with moist soil. This thistle, however, does not do as well in continually saturated or inundated soils (although, it does grow in seasonally saturated or inundated sites). It is extremely difficult to eradicate because it has an extensive root system and new plants can grow from even a small piece of root. One plant can colonize an area up to six feet (1.8 meters) in diameter in one or two years. Canada thistle grows to three to five feet (1-1.5 meters) tall, has spine -tipped leaves, smooth stems, and small lavender flowering heads. Management Measures: In addition to prevention, the critical management measure is to stress the plant by forcing it to use stored root nutrients. The most effective way to prevent this species is to revegetate moist bare soil. Cultural Control: After establishment, competition with other plants is helpful, but not completely effective in controlling this weed. Reseeding is often necessary after the thistle has been removed from an area. Keeping the area at optimal fertility and moisture levels to encourage grass growth is beneficial. Mechanical Control: Mowing can be effective when combined with herbicide treatments, especially in areas with competition with established grasses. Mow throughout the growing season and then treat with herbicides in the fall. Mowing alone, without herbicides, can be effective if done at one-month intervals over several years. Late spring burning will also stress the plant if sufficient dead plant material is available to carry a fire hot enough to kill spring rosettes. Burning will have to be repeated annually for several years or at three-year intervals. Pulling and digging the plant is ineffective due to its extensive root structure. Chemical Control: Herbicides can be effective, especially when combined with mowing, tilling, and competition with other plants. The larva of the weevil Ceutorhyncus litura bores into Canada thistle and weakens the plant. This weevil will not control Canada thistle alone, and can be combined with other methods. Urophora cardui, Lake Springs Ranch Vegetation Management Plan Beach Environmental. LLC y - 3 - • • Cassidia rubiginosa. and the painted lady butterfly are other biological control options for this weed. Releasing a combination of these insects is recommended, so every part of the weed is attacked. Grazing can be used in the spring and early summer to help control thistle in riparian areas as well. Biological Control — Three insects are currently available. It is best to release a combination of these three insects: Ceutorhyncus litura — a weevil that stesses the crown of the plant, Urophora carduii — a stem and shoot gall fly, and Casidia rubiginosa — a leaf beetle. Houndstongue (C).nojlossu,n officnale L) Description: Houndstongue is a member of the Borage family and is a biennial weed introduced from Europe. It reproduces from seed and appears as a leafy rosette in its first year. The stem is erect, stout, and heavy, 1.5 — 3 feet high, usually branched above. The leaves are alternate, the basal and lower ones are broad, and are oblong to lance - shaped. The upper leaves are narrower and pointed, almost clasping. The flowers are terminal and reddish -purple in color. The fruit consists of four nutlets (seeds), each about 1/3 inch long, with the outer surface covered with short, barbed prickles. Nutlets break apart at maturity and are rapidly scattered by animals. Houndstongue contains hepatotoxic compounds called pyrrolizidine alkaloids (PAs). PAs are common in other plants and create an economical impact on the livestock industry because of the loss of animals caused from eating such plants. Houndstongue has been implicated in the death of horses and cattle. The animals usually die from liver damage caused by the PAs. Houndstongue is a hardy weed, making it difficult to control. Cultural Control: Houndstongue is a prolific seed producer, and the seeds are readily spread by their ability to stick to animals. Physical removal of the plant at flowering or in early seed formation will break the cycle of the plant. Mechanical Control: This can be done by harrowing in two directions with a Triple K harrow. This method is effective in getting rid of the plant, but the seeds will be present. Chemical: Spraying is the most efficient method of eliminating this noxious wveed. Some of the products that have been used with success are 2, 4-D, dicamba, picloram, triclopyr, and 3 6-dichloropicolinic acid, EPTC, benefin, and 4-(2,4DB) . Surfactants are highly recommended due to the hairiness of leaf. Biological Control Mogulones cruciger is a weevil that has shown to be an effective biological control. The adults emerge in spring to mate and lay eggs on houndstongue rosettes and after the eggs Lake Sprints Ranch Vegetation Management Plan Beach Environmental, LLC - 4 - • • hatch, the larvae tunnel into the roots of their host plants where they can cause a lot of damage. Attacked plants are stressed, which reduces their survival and/or seed production. Hoary Cress (Cardaria draba) Description: Hoary cress is a member of the Mustard family and is commonly referred to as whitetop. It is a creeping perennial that reproduces by root 'b segments and seeds. The root 1'° '_; system extends both horizontally_AN and vertically. Hoary cress can Leaves are 1/2-2 inches grow 10-18 inches high. Flowers are produced in late April and May. The leaves are commonly covered with white hair, and the kiet flowers are gray -white in color. long and are oblong, with toothed margins. Cultural Control: If perennial native grasses are seeded in weedy areas, this will help to establish competition, thereby weakening the weed. Mechanical Control: Removal of the top growth has been shown to be somewhat effective. This treatment must be repeated at least twice a year to reduce seed production and spread. Chemical Control: Roundup (glyphosate) applied as a 2% solution at the flower stage has resulted in fairly good control. 2,4-D applied at 3 qts/acre 2 to 3 times per year for 3 years has also been somewhat effective. The best time to apply herbicides on Whitetop is in May or early June before flowering. Biological Control: None currently available. Weed Surveys When controlling weeds, the weed manager shall be on the lookout for outbreaks of other weedy species including but not limited to: Absinth Wormwood Perennial Pepperweed Yellow Toadflax Black Henbane Plumeless Thistle Blue Flax Canada Thistle Poison Hemlock Chicory Lake Springs Ranch Vegetation \lanagement Plan Beach Environmental, LLC - 5 - • • • Common Burdock Russian Knapweed Common Tansy Dalmatian Toadflax Russian Olive Dames Rocket Diffuse Knapweed Salt Cedar Mediterranean Sage Dyers Woad Scotch Thistle Oxeye Daisy Field Bindweed Spotted Knapweed Purple Loosestrife Hoary Cress (Whitetop) St. Johnswort Scentless Chamomile Houndstongue Sulfur Cinquefoil African Rue Jointed Goatgrass Rush Skeletonweed Camelthorn Leafy Spurge Sericea Lespedeza Musk Thistle Volunteer Rye Orange Hawkweed Yellow Starthistle Planting and Weed Control Schedule Hoary cress is the dominant weed on the Lake Springs Ranch. Due to its early flowering in April and May, weed control should be started at this time. Mechanical or chemical control can be applied to this weed to begin control. Weed inspection and control should continue throughout the summer months of June, July, and August. This schedule is geared towards the removal of the most common weeds on-site (Leafy spruge). However, some weedy species require different schedules and techniques for control. It is important that the weed control schedule remains flexible and is able to accommodate a variety of weeds. The weed manager is responsible for identifying outbreaks and if necessary, redesigning the schedule to control that particular weed. Once weeds are removed, it is important to reintroduce site appropriate native vegetation. This will help prevent the return of weeds to that area. Revegetation with native seed materials will occur annually during planting season. Seeds should be planted within two weeks of shipment. The revegetation site shall be prepared and wetted down prior to planting. Additionally, supplemental watering shall occur after planting to ensure a high survival rate of native seeds. This can be accomplished through temporary on-site irrigation. Plant NIaterial List for Revegetation Planting Plant materials will be provided by local seed companies whom will recommend a seed mixture for the Lake Springs Ranch for revegetation planting. It is recommended that native materials be used to the most practicable extent possible. Plant materials to be used for revegetation planting will be native grasses either taken on-site or purchased from a local plant nursery such as: Rocky Mountain Native Plants Company 2730 Snowmass Creek Road Snowmass Colorado 81654 970 927-0925 Lake Springs Ranch Veeetation Management Plan Beach Environmental, LLC - 6 - Pawnee Buttes Seed Inc. 605 25th St. Greeley, Colorado 80632 1-800-782-5947 • • • Proposed species to be used are the dominant granimids already present on-site and may include a mixture of one or more of the following: PLANT \IATERIAL LIST FOR THE LAKE SPRINGS RANCH Koeleria macrantha prairie junegrass Agropyron spicatum Bluebunch wheatgrass Festuca arizonica Arizona fescue Poa fendleriana muttongrass Pascopyron smithii Western wheatgrass Carex nebrascensis Nebraska sedge Weed Control Service Pesticide application will be provided for by a local weed control service company in the Roaring Fork valley, including but not limited to: Gallagher Agriculture Services 7348 County Rd 331 Silt 876-2864 Mountain Lawn 3758 Hwy 82 Glenwood Springs 945-9333 Roaring Fork Vegetation Management CO. El Jebel 963-9723 The Lake Springs Ranch will provide for payment for chemical application and all other weed control measures and will be responsible for the successful implementation of the weed management plan. 0283wmp.doc Lake Springs Ranch Vegetation Management Plan Beach Environmental, LLC - 7 - 0 WILDFIRE REPORT • • • • • Crockett & Associates Emergency Planning Services 2669 Maroon Creek Road Aspen, CO 81611 970-925-2890 June 7, 2001 Ron Liston Land Design Partnership 918 Cooper Avenue Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Re: Lake Springs Ranch Wildfire Hazard Assessment Dear Ron, As per our agreement, please find the Wildfire Hazard Assessment Report for the Lake Springs Ranch PUD. The following report is derived from information gathered from site visits conducted on April 29, 2001 with Ron Liston, Land Design Partnership and on May 8, 2001 with Vince Urbina from the Colorado State Forest Service, The Lake Springs Ranch PUD proposal lies approximately four (4) miles up Garfield County Road # 114 (Spring Valley Road) from Colorado State Highway 82 roughly seven (7) miles south-east of the town of Glenwood Springs, Colorado and lies within the Carbondale & Rural Fire Protection District. The PUD proposes approximately 200 (+/-) units situated on an average of one (1) acre (+/-) lots dispersed in an area encompassing approximately 441 acres. A portion of the proposal is currently being utilized as a commercial sod farm. The PUD lies on predominantly west to southwest facing slopes with elevations ranging between 6800' and 7300'. The terrain is characterized by gentle slopes interspersed with small benches. Rough average slope analysis indicates slopes varying from less than eight (8) to eleven (11) percent with an overall average of approximately 9.25 percent with occasional small, short pitches of 20 (+/-) percent. Vegetation throughout the proposal varies and is intermixed including mineral soil, irrigated sod, grass, serviceberry, sage brush interspersed with occasional small, widely separated stands of oak -brush and intermittent Pinion/Juniper trees. •The Lake Springs Ranch proposal lies within an area that is mapped for Low and Moderate Wildfire hazard on the Garfield County Wildfire Hazard Map. Of the lots represented on the General Site Plan map dated 4/30/01 by High Country Engineering, the lot/hazard distribution is roughly 45% Low, 37% Moderate, .05% Moderate/ Severe and 13% Severe. Over 80 % of the application lies within Low to Moderate wildfire hazard areas. Based on the existing conditions of slopes and vegetation, the assessment of the wildfire hazards associated with the Lake Springs Ranch PUD is that with the comprehensive application of recognized industry mitigation standards and guidelines, the wildfire hazards associated with the proposal can be appropriately mitigated. In addition, I have included a letter from the Colorado State Forest Service to my report. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you require any additional information or assistance. I remain available for additional consultation with you and the Lake Springs Ranch PUD development staff. Sincerely, • Stephen S. Crockett Attachments: Letter from the Colorado State Forest Service • • May 16, 2001 Steve Crockett Crockett & Associates 2669 Maroon Creek Road Aspen, CO 81611 Re: Lake Springs Development Wildfire Hazard Review 03100g FOREST SERVICE State Services Building 222 S. 6th Street, Room 416 Grand Junction, Colorado 81501 Telephone: (9701 248-7325 Dear Steve, Please include this letter with any correspondence to Garfield County. When I get the referral from Garfield County 1 will defer to the comments in this letter. I will revisit the site only if necessary. I visited the proposed subdivision with Steve Crockett the owner's representative on May 8thI revisited the property on May 15th to clarify some of my notes. County Road 114 bisects the subdivision and is presently in good shape. The majority of the proposed lots will be accessed from this county road. There are some existing roads that Steve and I used to get a closer look at the existing vegetation. These roads are very rough and impassable when wet. The existing grades are not prohibitive. The Colorado State Forest Service (CSFS) uses the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 299 Standard for Protection of Life and Property from Wildfire as a reference. This standard has several recommendations in regards to roads. They apply in this situation. 1) Simultaneous access for emergency vehicles and the evacuation of residents shall be provided for by a traveled way of not less than 24 feet. Shoulders shall be a minimum of 4 feet on each side of the roadway. I visit many mountain subdivisions on a regular basis and most have seriously inadequate road systems (e.g., narrow roads, dead ends, steep grades). !would encourage the developer to invest in a good safe road system from the beginning. 2) Every dead-end roadway (e.g., cul-de-sac) more than 300 feet in length shall be provided with a turn around at the terminus having no less than 120 feet outside diameter of traveled way. The local fire authority could approve a "hammerhead -T" as an alternative to provide emergency vehicles with a three-point turnaround ability. Steve and 1 used the General Site Plan (dated 4/30/01) produced by High Country Engineering to orient us around the subdivision. My comments are based on the block and lot demarcation from that survey. Block 1 These proposed lots are presently growing irrigated sod. The wildfire hazard is low. Block 2 An existing one -lane road splits this block. West of the road is irrigated sod, also a low wildfire •hazard. The irrigated sod covers Lots 1 — 5. East of the one lane road are Lots 10 — 17. The vegetation is composed of grass, sage and scattered Gambel oak/serviceberry. The wildfire hazard is moderate. Page 2 — Lake Springs PUD dock 3 The existing one -lane road also splits this block. West of this road is irrigated sod. The irrigated sod covers Lots 1 — 30. The wildfire hazard is low. Block 4 Lots 1 — 4 have more grass than sage. Some time in the recent past the sage was either mowed or chained. This mechanical treatment helped to lower the wildfire hazard from a moderate to a low rating. Lots 6 — 10 and 12 — 14 are irrigated sod. Wildfire hazard is low. Lots 15 — 19 have a west aspect. The vegetation is 1 to 2 foot sage and grass. Wildfire hazard is moderate. Block 5 Lots 1 — 7 and 16 — 20 run along a nearly level ridge top on either side of an existing driveway. The soils must be better here because the vegetation is taller (e.g., 3 foot tall sage with scattered oak/serviceberry). The wildfire hazard is moderate to severe. Lots 21 — 29 have a south aspect with 1 to 2 foot sage and grass. Wildfire hazard is moderate. Block 6 Lots 1 — 9 and 27 — 35 have a west aspect. The vegetation is grass, sage and scattered Gambel oak. I would rate the wildfire hazard as moderate. Block 7 Lots 1 — 4 have a west aspect. The vegetation is grass. sage and clumpy oak. The wildfire hazard is moderate. Lots 5 & 6 have oak/serviceberry with scattered juniper. The wildfire hazard is severe due to the density of oak/serviceberry shrubs. Lots 11 — 20 ring a proposed cul-de-sac. The sage was also mechanically treated here because the existing vegetation is •nostly grass. The wildfire hazard is low. Block 8 Lots 1 — 6 have a north aspect. The vegetation is taller oak/serviceberry. The wildfire hazard is moderate to severe. Lots 7 & 8 sit in a bench with dense sage, oak/serviceberry in the taller size classes. Wildfire hazard is leaning toward severe. Lots 9 — 11 burned some time in the recent past. The vegetation is now grass and would carry a low wildfire hazard rating. Lots 12 — 14 surround a small knob. The vegetation is short sage with scattered pinyon/juniper. The wildfire hazard is moderate. In every lot the vegetation can be easily mitigated to a lower and safer wildfire condition by mechanically eliminating the sage and/or oak/serviceberry. This was done in Blocks 4 and 7 as I noted earlier in this letter. 1 enclosed a copy of the CSFS Defensible Space Thinning Standards for your information. Any CSFS recommendations to mitigate the wildfire hazard would come from these standards. Feel free to call me with any questions. Sincerely, Vince Urbina Assistant District Forester •Enclosure 4 GENERAL AREA OF NOXIOUS WEEDS HOARY CRESS_" CANADIAN THISTLE HOUNDSTONGUE AND CANADIAN THISTLE o z U) O_ zz z IV 11 V W Z W 07 4:r (fid 6z W �c Qx J0 z DRAWN BY: re WILDLIFE REPORT BEA TTIE NATURAL RESOURCES CONSULTING, INC. • Wildlife management Deer and elk management Environmental site assessments Natural resource inventories Development impacts on wildlife Forestry Water rights inv tions 3ov amental liaison Environmental permit applications Trout stream management Pond weed control Pond fish management Pond aeration systems 4utomatic fish feeders Revegetation Wildlife mitigation Biological assessments Ya dating a ding structures Wetlands Wildlife food plots Kirk H. Beattie, Ph.D. 1546 E. 12th Street Rifle, CO 81650 E -Mail: beattie@imageline.com February 12, 2001 Ron Liston Land Design Partnership 918 Cooper Avenue Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Berkeley Family Limited Partnership c/o Michael Berkeley 3961 County Road 114 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Re: Lake Springs Ranch Via U.S. Postal Service Priority Mail Dear Ron and Michael: 131 Office: 970-625-0599 Fax: 970-625-0600 Home: 970-625-0598 Cellular: 970-379-1451 I have enclosed a wildlife report for each of you for the Lake Springs Ranch PUD. The report addresses deer, elk, T&E species, and ways to minimize conflicts between people and wildlife. Ron, please contact me should you need changes made in the report, particularly the idea of homebuyers contributing $500 to a Wildlife Impact Fund. Sincerely, BEATTIE NATURAL RESOURCES CONSULTING, INC. By: Kirk H. Beattie, Ph.D. KHB/kb Encl: Report BEATTIE NATURAL RESOURCES CONSULTING, INC. • Kirk H. Beattie, Ph.D. Office: 970-625-0599 1546 E. 12th Street Fax: 970-625-0600 Home: 970-625-0598 Rifle, CO 81650 e-mail: beattie@imageline.com Cellular: 970-379-1451 • • MINIMIZING WILDLIFE -HUMAN CONFLICTS ON THE LAKE SPRINGS RANCH PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT Prepared for Berkeley Family Limited Partnership c/o Michael Berkeley 3961 County Road 114 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Land Design Partnership 918 Cooper Avenue Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Prepared by Kirk H. Beattie, Ph.D. Beattie Natural Resources Consulting, Inc. 1546 E. 12th Street Rifle, CO 81650 February, 2001 Wildlife and the Lake Springs Ranch Planned Unit Development Page i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1 Introduction 2 Interview with Paul Dill 3 Wildlife Information From NDIS/SCoP 4 Threatened and Endangered Species 4 Reptiles 5 Amphibians 5 Mammals 7 Birds 9 Maintaining/Improving Conditions for Wildlife 40 10 Dogs and Pet Control 12 Fences 13 Garbage, Trash, and Compost Containers 13 Indemnification 14 Disposal of Animal Carcasses 14 Securing hay 14 Skunk and Raccoon Denning Areas 14 Feeding Wildlife 15 Education 15 Enforcement of Provisions by HOA 18 Wildlife Impact Fund • Beattie Natural Resources Consulting, Inc. February, 2001 Wildlife and the Lake Springs Ranch Planned Unit Development Page ii TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) Page 19 Literature Cited 20 Tables F1 Figures Beattie Natural Resources Consulting, Inc. February, 2001 Wildlife and the Lake Springs Ranch Planned Unit Development Page iii Page 20 23 LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Colorado listing of endangered, threatened and wildlife species of special concern. Table 2. Federal threatened and endangered species reported for Colorado. Beattie Natural Resources Consulting, Inc. February, 2001 Wildlife and the Lake Springs Ranch Planned Unit Development Page iv • LIST OF FIGURES • • Page F1 Figure 1. Vicinity map for the Lake Springs Ranch PUD ("SITE"). F2 Figure 2. Sketch plan for the Lake Springs Ranch PUD. F3 Figure 3. Approximate range of the boreal toad in Colorado. Source: redrawn map obtained from Terry Ireland, Division of Ecological Services, U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Grand Junction, Colorado. F4 Figure 4. System for Conservation Planning (ScOP) mapped mule deer winter activity areas on the Lake Springs Ranch PUD. F5 Figure 5. System for Conservation Planning (ScOP) mapped elk summer activity areas on the Lake Springs Ranch PUD. F6 Figure 6. System for Conservation Planning (ScOP) mapped elk winter activity areas on the Lake Springs Ranch PUD. F7 Figure 7. Colorado Division of Wildlife lynx potential habitat map. Source: www.ndis.nrel.colostate.edu/excop/images/maps/lynx.jpg. F8 Figure 8. Distribution of the kit fox in Colorado (Fitzgerald et al. 1994:309). F9 Figure 9. Historic distribution of the black -footed ferret in Colorado. Source: Fitzgerald et al. 1994:344. F10 Figure 10. Distribution of the northern river otter in Colorado. Open circles represent historic records of occurrence. Solid circles represent restored populations. Source: Fitzgerald et al. 1994:363. F11 Figure 11. Bald eagle winter and summer range in Colorado (Andrews and Righter 1992:68) F12 Figure 12. Summer and winter range of the western burrowing owl in Colorado (Andrews and Righter 1992:177). F13 Figure 13. Areas of fairly common migrational sightings of whooping cranes in Colorado. Source: redrawn map obtained from Terry Ireland, Division of Ecological Services, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Grand Junction, Colorado. Beattie Natural Resources Consulting, Inc. February, 2001 Wildlife and the Lake Springs Ranch Planned Unit Development Page v 4111/ LIST OF FIGURES (continued) • • Page F14 Figure 14. General range of the Mexican spotted owl in Colorado. Source: redrawn map obtained from Terry Ireland, Division of Ecological Services, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Grand Junction, Colorado. F15 Figure 15. Historic and current distribution of the sharp -tailed grouse in Colorado. Source: Andrews and Righter (1992:93). F16 Figure 16. Summer and migration habitat for the least tern in Colorado (Andrews and Righter 1992:160). F17 Figure 17. Approximate range of the southwestern willow flycatcher in Colorado. Source: map obtained from Terry Ireland, Division of Ecological Services, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Grand Junction, Colorado. F18 Figure 18. Overall range of Preble's Meadow Jumping Mouse (source: www:ndis.nrel.colostate.edu/escop/maps/pjmovmap.jpg) Beattie Natural Resources Consulting, Inc. February, 2001 Wildlife and the Lake Springs Ranch Planned Unit Development Page 1 INTRODUCTION The Berkeley Family Limited Partnership and Miriam Berkeley have proposed development of the Lake Springs Ranch Planned Unit Development (PUD). The site proposed for development is located in the southerly portion of Spring Valley immediately north of lands owned by Colorado Mountain College and immediately south of the approved Chenoa PUD (Fig. 1). The 442 -acre property is situated in Sections 32, 33, 34, Township 6 South, Range 88 West, and Section 4, Township 7 South, Range 88 West, 6th Principal Meridian, Garfield County, Colorado. The property is split north to south by County Road (CR) 114 and east to west by County Road 119. The property includes both valley floor and the adjacent rolling slopes that define Spring Valley. The lower valley floor has historically been in irrigated agricultural production and is currently the location of the Rivendell Sod Farm. An elk -proof fence surrounds the sod farm. The rolling slopes above the valley floor range in gradient from 5% to some areas in excess of 40%. Vegetation on the slopes is dominated by sagebrush and Gambel's oak. Pinyon pines are distributed sporadically on the hillsides and with the exception of a few individuals, juniper trees are absent. Grass meadows and a grass-forb understory occur on the hillsides. The rolling slopes have served as dryland pasture for the long-time ranching operations. One large and one small pond are located on the uphill side of CR 114. A large pond is located on the southerly area of the valley floor which is dominated by wetlands. The northerly area of the valley floor is planted in sod. The PUD proposes 194 single family lots located on the rolling hillsides and the edge of the valley floor (Fig. 2). There are four larger tracts of land zoned to Beattie Natural Resources Consulting Inc. February, 2001 Wildlife and the Lake Springs Ranch Planned Unit Development Page 2 • accommodate four dwelling units each or 16 dwellings that could range from four single family residences to a four-plex multi -family structure. Five areas on the PUD are proposed as agricultural open space. The Berkeley Family Limited Partnership retained Beattie Natural Resources Consulting to identify mechanisms to minimize conflicts between people and wildlife. Because the Lake Springs Ranch PUD was previously approved in 1979, I did not analyze the impact of the development on wildlife in general. However, I will provide a brief overview of the potential for impacts to mule deer, elk, and threatened/endangered species. I will then identify avenues for minimizing conflicts between residents of the PUD and wildlife. • • INTERVIEW WITH PAUL DILL Paul Dill is a partner in the Rivendell Sod Farm and has lived onsite since 1992. I interviewed Mr. Dill on February 5, 2001 to obtain his perspective on wildlife use of the area proposed for development. Mr. Dill reported that mountain lion sightings are increasing in the area, particularly north and west of the proposed development. Mr. Dill reported seeing black bears in the general area since 1992. During this past summer, a black bear tried to get into a garbage dumpster located near the office of the Rivendell Sod Farm. The bear stayed in the area for two weeks. Mr. Dill believes that mule deer and coyote populations are increasing. Mule deer can be observed year-round on the property. The area does not contain a resident population of elk, although elk can at times be seen on the property in the winter and spring. Canada geese utilize the sod farm for grazing and numerous geese and ducks Beattie Natural Resources Consulting Inc. February, 2001 Wildlife and the Lake Springs Ranch Planned Unit Development Page 3 • use the two ponds located uphill from CR 114. Mr. Dill reported seeing up to 300 Canada geese at one time on the Targe pond located uphill from CR 114. A neighboring rancher grazes cattle on the sagebrush/scrub oak hillsides for about one month each year to reduce fuel for potential wildfires. WILDLIFE INFORMATION FROM NDIS/SCoP Databases accessed for preparation of this report included the Natural Diversity Information Source (NDIS) and the System for Conservation Planning (SCOP) [www.ndis.nrel.colostate.edu]. NDIS and SCOP are a collaborative effort of the Colorado Division of Wildlife, the Colorado Department of Natural Resources, the Colorado Natural Heritage Program, and Colorado State University. SCOP provides maps of activity areas of wildlife species, maps of element occurrences (e.g. species, Ssubspecies, populations, natural communities), maps of conservation sites, and maps of suitable habitat. Habitat suitability maps are created by dividing land in a county into 100 X 100 meter cells and determining if a species has an affinity for the vegetation cover in a cell, if the cell is within the elevation range of the species, and if the cell is sufficiently close to water for species that require access to free water, such as ponds, steams, and lakes. It is important to note that although suitable habitat may exist for a species in a particular area, this habitat may not be occupied by the species. I selected a user -defined area slightly larger than the size of the PUD and had SCoP generate habitat suitability maps for mule deer and elk. Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) coordinates selected to define the search area were N 4373667 E 307341, N 4373667 E 309753, N 4372643 E 309753, and N 4372643 E 307341. • Beattie Natural Resources Consulting Inc. February, 2001 Wildlife and the Lake Springs Ranch Planned Unit Development Page 4 • The Lake Springs Ranch PUD is mapped as mule deer overall habitat, summer range, and winter range. None of the property is classified by SCoP as mule deer severe winter range or as a mule deer winter concentration area (Fig. 4). Essentially, some deer live year-round on the rolling slopes of the PUD and other deer travel to the area at various times of the year. The PUD is mapped as elk overall range. A small parcel of land located northeast of the PUD is mapped as summer range. The PUD is not classified as an elk summer production area (calving grounds) or as a summer concentration area (Fig. 5). During the summer, elk utilize high -elevation meadows and forests located north of the proposed PUD. The Lake Springs Ranch PUD is considered elk winter range but is not classified as elk severe winter range or as a winter concentration area (Fig. 6). Elk are • most frequently seen on the property during the winter and spring months. While I observed mule deer on the rolling hillsides during a February 9 survey, I did not observe elk or recent sign of elk use. • THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES I evaluated the potential impact of the Lake Springs Ranch PUD on threatened and endangered wildlife. Colorado endangered and threatened wildlife species are listed in Table 1. Federal threatened and endangered species are listed in Table 2. Reptiles There are no federal or state classified species of threatened or endangered reptiles in Colorado. Beattie Natural Resources Consulting Inc. February, 2001 Wildlife and the Lake Springs Ranch Planned Unit Development Page 5 • Amphibians The only amphibian listed by Colorado as endangered is the boreal toad. The boreal toad is a high elevation (7,000 feet - 12,900 feet) toad that lives in suitable habitat in lodgepole pine, spruce -fir forests and alpine meadow areas. The boreal toad has been found in shallow water or among sedges and shrubby willows where the soil is damp or wet. The proposed development site does not contain the high -elevation habitat features required by the boreal toad and is below the elevational limits at which the boreal toad is typically found (Fig. 3). Hammerson (1986:26) reported that this species does not occur on or near the proposed development. The Lake Springs Ranch PUD will not affect the boreal toad or its habitat. Mammals • The grizzly bear is federally listed as threatened in Colorado and state listed as endangered. Although grizzly bears were once common throughout Colorado, it appears they have been extirpated from the state (Armstrong 1972, Cary 1911, Warren 1942). In 1979, an adult female grizzly attacked a hunting guide near Platoro Reservoir on the northeastern edge of the San Juan Mountains (Barrows and Holmes 1990). The guide reportedly killed the bear with a hand-held arrow. This animal was the last known specimen killed in Colorado. The black -footed ferret, a federal and Colorado endangered species, once occurred throughout most of Colorado. The historic range of the black -footed ferret does not include southeastern Garfield County (Fig. 9). Black -footed ferrets use prairie dog burrows for living quarters and are heavily dependent on prairie dogs for food. • Beattie Natural Resources Consulting Inc. February, 2001 Wildlife and the Lake Springs Ranch Planned Unit Development Page 6 • Prairie dog colonies do not occur on the Lake Springs Ranch PUD. There will be no impact on black -footed ferrets as a result of the PUD. The gray wolf, a Colorado endangered species, once occurred in every county in Colorado. However, no authentic records of wolves in Colorado occur after 1935 (Fitzgerald et al. 1994:307). Preble's meadow jumping mouse (PMJM) is listed as a federal and Colorado threatened species. PMJM occurs only on the Front Range in a band running north from the Wyoming border to Pueblo (Fig. 18). The lynx, wolverine, river otter, and kit fox are Colorado endangered species. Wolverine do not occur on the proposed PUD. The river otter once occurred in most of the river drainages of Colorado and was subsequently extirpated. Starting in 1976, the • CDOW began transplanting river otters in several drainages. Transplants have been made in the Colorado, Gunnison, Piedros, and Dolores rivers. The river otter does not occur historically in Garfield County and the proposed Lake Springs Ranch PUD will have no impact on otters (Fig. 10). The kit fox can be found in extreme southwestern Garfield County along the Utah border but does not occur near Lake Springs Ranch (Fig. 8). The Canada lynx is a federally threatened and Colorado endangered species. Colorado is on the southern edge of historic lynx range, and before reintroduction in 1999, there had been no confirmed sightings in the state since 1973. Forty-one lynx were released near Pagosa Springs in February 1999 and an additional release was made in the same area during the winter of 2000. Some of the male lynx wandered as far as New Mexico, Wyoming, and Nebraska, Beattie Natural Resources Consulting Inc. February, 2001 Wildlife and the Lake Springs Ranch Planned Unit Development Page 7 In the southern Rocky Mountains, lynx are found predominantly above 7,800 feet. Vegetation affinities include aspen, spruce fir, spruce -fir clearcuts, Douglas fir, blue spruce, lodgepole pine clearcuts, limber pine, white fir, bristlecone pine, mixed conifer, mixed forest, and shrub tundra. The proposed PUD is below the elevation at which lynx typically occur in Colorado and does not contain the vegetation types associated with lynx habitat. In addition, Lake Springs Ranch lies outside of potential lynx habitat identified by the CDOW (Fig. 7). Development of the PUD will have no direct impact on lynx or lynx habitat. Birds The bald eagle is a federal and state threatened species. Bald eagles can commonly be seen flying over the Colorado River during the winter months and can be seen perched on tall cottonwood trees along the Colorado River (Fig. 11). The area encompassing the proposed PUD is not considered primary or secondary bald eagle range and does not contain confirmed summer breeding and nonbreeding sites (Fig. 11). Development of the Lake Springs Ranch PUD will have no direct impact on bald eagle habitat. The southwestern willow flycatcher (SWWF) is a federal and Colorado endangered species. The SWWF is a riparian obligate, nesting only in dense, mesic riparian habitats, particularly areas dominated by willows. This habitat does not occur on the proposed Lake Springs Ranch. The area proposed for the PUD lies outside of the known breeding range of the SWWF (Fig. 17) and I have not previously detected the SWWF in the general area. In my opinion, the proposed project is very unlikely to affect Beattie Natural Resources Consulting Inc. February, 2001 Wildlife and the Lake Springs Ranch Planned Unit Development Page 8 • breeding SWWFs because it does not contain dense willows and it occurs outside the known breeding range of the species. The western burrowing owl is a state -threatened species. The owl is called a "burrowing owl" because it nest and roosts in abandoned burrows dug by mammals, especially prairie dogs. Burrowing owls strongly prefer burrows in active black -tailed prairie dog towns. The burrowing owl is a winter visitor in eastern Colorado and a summer resident in extreme southern Garfield County (Fig. 12). It does not occur in the vicinity of the proposed Lake Springs Ranch. The whooping crane is a federal and Colorado endangered species. It is an uncommon spring and fall migrant in the San Luis Valley and is a casual migrant on the eastern plains. Although the eastern one-half of Garfield County lies outside of areas of . fairly common migrational sightings in Colorado (Fig. 13), I observed a single whooping crane 6 years ago in a marsh south of the Colorado River between Silt and Rifle. Development of Lake Springs Ranch will have no impact on the whooping crane. The least tern is a federal and Colorado endangered bird. Breeding least terns nest on bare sandy shorelines of islands in reservoirs and migrants occur at reservoirs, lakes, and rivers with bare sandy shorelines (Andrews and Righter 1992:160). There are no historical records of winter, spring, summer or fall occurrences of the least tern in Garfield County (Fig. 16). Lake Springs Ranch will have no impact on the endangered least tern. The Mexican spotted owl is a federal and Colorado threatened species and is a relative of the northern spotted owl which has caused furor in the Pacific Northwest. IDThe species occupies two distinct habitat types in Colorado. The first consists of Targe, Beattie Natural Resources Consulting Inc. February, 2001 Wildlife and the Lake Springs Ranch Planned Unit Development Page 9 steep canyons with exposed cliffs and dense old growth mixed coniferous forests. The second consists of canyons in pinyon -juniper areas with small and widely scattered patches of old Douglas fir. Summer roosting sites are in a cool microclimate, generally with a closed canopy and/or on a north -facing slope. All known Colorado nest sites consist of small scrapes in caves or crevices on steep cliff faces. It is highly improbable that development of the Lake Springs Ranch would impact the Mexican spotted owl. The piping plover is a federal threatened species. There are no documented sightings of the piping plover in Garfield County during migration, summer or winter (Andrews and Righter 1992:110). Habitat is generally mudflats and shorelines of reservoirs and lakes and breeding birds prefer sandy open shorelines with pebbles. Development of the Lake Springs Ranch will not impact the piping plover. The Plain's sharp -tailed grouse is a state endangered species and is a rare to uncommon resident in Douglas County (Fig. 15). This subspecies formerly occurred in eastern Colorado west to Larimer County and south to El Paso, Lincoln, and Kit Carson counties. This species does not occur in Garfield County and will thus not be affected by development of Lake Springs Ranch. After reviewing available information and reports, conducting a wildlife field survoy, and interviewing District Wildlife Manager KeIIy Wood, I do not believe there are any federal or Colorado threatened or endangered vertebrates that would be measurably impacted by the Lake Springs Ranch PUD. MAINTAINING/IMPROVING CONDITIONS FOR WILDLIFE On February 9, 2001 I met with CDOW District Wildlife Manager Kelly Wood at • the Rivendell Sod Farm. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss ways to reduce Beattie Natural Resources Consulting Inc. February, 2001 Wildlife and the Lake Springs Ranch Planned Unit Development Page 10 conflicts between people and wildlife on the PUD. DWM Wood and myself were in agreement regarding controls and restrictions that would allow residents of the subdivision to accommodate wildlife and that would reduce conflicts with wildlife. I recommend that the two existing ponds located east of CR 114 across from the Rivendell Sod Farm entrance be maintained. They are used significantly by waterfowl and are also used by deer, cottontail rabbits, shorebirds, and other vertebrates. Planting small patches of willows at various places along the shoreline would improve conditions for wildlife. In addition to the agricultural open space designation for the sod farm, the sketch plan shows four smaller agriculture/open space parcels. If so desired by the developer, these parcels could be managed with the intent of enhancing their value to wildlife. As suggested at the end of this report, creation of a Wildlife Impact Fund would provide revenue for on- and off-site conservation activities to benefit wildlife. DOGS AND PET CONTROL Free -roaming dogs can have a substantial impact on deer. Free -roaming dogs include dogs normally around residences and occasionally wandering off and feral dogs (domesticated at one time but now semi -wild or wild). Free -roaming dogs can injure, disable and kill deer. Dog chases can also result in aborted young and a weakened physical condition in deer. It is necessary that dogs be controlled in the subdivision for the safety of residents and to curb harassment and killing of wildlife. I recommend the following control measures for the Lake Springs Ranch Subdivision: III A. No dwelling unit should house more than three dogs and offspring up to three Beattie Natural Resources Consulting Inc. February, 2001 Wildlife and the Lake Springs Ranch Planned Unit Development Page 11 months of age. I have previously seen recommendations for subdivisions in Garfield County that limit dogs to one per household. Dogs are an important part of life for many people and I think it is important to allow up to three dogs per household. Properly controlled or confined, dogs will not affect wildlife. B. At no time should dogs be allowed to run freely outside of a dog owner's lot. C. When outside a resident's lot on Lake Springs Ranch Subdivision, dogs should be leashed (dogs being transported into and out of the subdivision by motor vehicle would obviously not be required to be leashed). D. When outside the residence on an owner's lot, dogs should be controlled by: 1. Confinement in an area bound by an aboveground fence; 2. Confinement in a kennel; 3. Confinement in an area bounded by an invisible electric fence attached to a dwelling unit; 4. A leash; or 5. Attachment by a tether to a fixed, immovable object. The tether length should not allow the dog to trespass on another owner's lot. E. Dogs should not be allowed to chase or molest wildlife or any domestic animals or persons, or destroy or disturb property of another. F. Dogs should not be allowed to bark continuously, which shall be defined as barking for a 15 -minute period, including successive barks or a series of barks which repeat or resume following a brief or temporary cessation. G. All dogs should be licensed as required by law. H. No dog should threaten public safety. Beattie Natural Resources Consulting Inc. February, 2001 Wildlife and the Lake Springs Ranch Planned Unit Development Page 12 I. The lot owner should be responsible for assuring compliance with dog regulations of another owner's dog occurring on a lot with the permission of the lot owner. J. No dog or other animal should be kept upon a unit which, in the sole discretion and judgment of the Association's Board of Directors, results in an annoyance or is obnoxious to unit owners within the subdivision. K. Cats should not be allowed outside unless they are controlled by a leash. L. Homeowners not in compliance with dog and other pet regulations should be responsible for any and all costs associated with enforcement of the aforementioned provisions of the Lake Springs Ranch Subdivision Homeowners Association (HOA). FENCES Single family residences on the PUD are typically just over one acre in size with the rear portion of the lots proposed for preservation as undeveloped by the designation of building envelopes for each lot. Perimeter fencing should not be allowed. However, a limited area of each lot, as determined by the developer, should allow fencing for confinement of pets and for the privacy of the occupants. "Wildlife -friendly" fences are typically a maximum of 42 inches high. If a rail fence or 3 -strand wire fence is constructed, there should be a 12 -inch separation between the top 2 rails/wire. Beattie Natural Resources Consulting Inc. February, 2001 Wildlife and the Lake Springs Ranch Planned Unit Development Page 13 GARBAGE, TRASH, AND COMPOST CONTAINERS It is important that residents of the Lake Springs Ranch Subdivision store garbage and trash in secure receptacles to reduce problems with skunks, raccoons, and bears. No refuse, garbage, trash, grass, shrub, or tree clippings, plant waste, scrap, rubbish, or debris of any kind should be kept, stored, maintained or allowed to accumulate or remain on any lot except temporarily within an enclosed structure within a building envelope. No garbage container, trash cans or receptacles should be maintained in an unsanitary condition. Trash receptacles should not be put by the curb except on the day of garbage pickup. Garbage structures and containers should be bearproof/bear-resistant and should comply with recommendations which may be made from time to time by the CDOW. Household trash compactors typically employ the use of bags designed to control odor of garbage. Builders and homeowners should be encouraged to install a trash compactor during home construction. This system would reduce the odor of garbage which may attract skunks, bears, and raccoons. INDEMNIFICATION The Lake Springs Ranch Subdivision Homeowner's Association should waive and hold the CDOW harmless from any and all claims for damages to landscaping improvements, fencing, ornamental and native plants, and garden plants resulting from the activities of wildlife. Beattie Natural Resources Consulting Inc. February, 2001 Wildlife and the Lake Springs Ranch Planned Unit Development Page 14 DISPOSAL OF ANIMAL CARCASSES The HOA and lot owners should be responsible for the removal and disposal of all animal carcasses (e.g. deer, raccoons) located upon the subdivision. SECURING HAY Unless prohibited by covenants, some residents may choose to maintain horses or cows on their property. To reduce problems with deer and elk, hay stored on a lot should be secured by a tarp, stored in a structure, or fenced. SKUNK AND RACCOON DENNING AREAS Residents of the Lake Springs Ranch Subdivision should maintain their lots in a manner that will not attract denning skunks and raccoons. This can be addressed in the • covenants by prohibiting the open storage of junk automobiles, machinery, appliances, junk piles, scrap piles, and other materials which may be used by skunks and raccoons for denning sites. FEEDING WILDLIFE Under Colorado law, it is illegal to intentionally feed deer, elk, antelope, mountain goats, bighorn sheep, mountain lions and bears. Although residents of the subdivision could legally set out meat scraps to attract raccoons, foxes, etc., this practice should be prohibited because of the possibility of attracting bears, mountain lions, and coyotes. The Colorado Division of Wildlife encourages using backyard bird feeders to supplement natural food for songbirds. However, residents of the subdivision should be aware that certain bird foods, particularly hummingbird nectar and suet, are attractive to IIIblack bears. Beattie Natural Resources Consulting Inc. February, 2001 Wildlife and the Lake Springs Ranch Planned Unit Development Page 15 Pets should not be fed outside. Bowls of pet food left on the back deck or porch will attract bears and other predators (e.g. coyotes) and nuisance species of wildlife (e.g. skunks). Some of these wildlife species may carry diseases that can be transmitted to pets. EDUCATION If residents of Lake Springs Ranch are informed about potential problems with wildlife, it is likely there will be fewer conflicts. The CDOW publishes pamphlets which provide information about living with wildlife. I recommend that at the time of closing on a home in the subdivision, homeowners be provided with one copy of each of the following CDOW publications: 1. Living with wildlife in bear country. 2. Living with wildlife in mountain lion country. 3. Living with wildlife in coyote country. 4. Too close for comfort: how to avoid conflicts with wildlife in the city. 5. Don't feed the wildlife: wildlife and people at risk. ENFORCEMENT OF PROVISIONS BY HOA I would anticipate that most potential conflicts and problems between homeowners of the Lake Springs Ranch Subdivision would be resolved on an informal basis. However, in the event that conflicts (e.g. dog control, hay storage, fencing) are not resolved by discussion among homeowners, it is important that HOA enforcement provisions be available. Beattie Natural Resources Consulting Inc. February, 2001 Wildlife and the Lake Springs Ranch Planned Unit Development Page 16 The Lake Springs Ranch Subdivision Homeowner's Association should be empowered to enforce covenants, conditions and restrictions for the subdivision. In the event that there is a violation of the covenants, conditions, and/or restrictions, the following enforcement procedures should be taken by the Association: 1. The owner violating a covenant, condition, and/or restriction should first receive a written warning of the violation. 2. If a second offense occurs by an owner of the same type of violation or the owner does not correct the initial violation within one (1) calendar day after receiving notice (or such reasonable time as is necessary in order for the owner to correct the violation), then a fine of $100 will be assessed against the owner. 3. Upon the occurrence of a third offense of the same type of violation or the continuation of a violation in excess of two (2) calendar days after the owner receives notice, a fine of $150 will be assessed against the owner. 4. Upon the occurrence of a fourth offense of the same type of violation or the continuance of a violation in excess of four (4) calendar days after the owner receives notice, a fine of $300 will be assessed against the owner. In addition, the Association may take such action as is reasonably necessary to cause the violation to cease, including entry on the property of the owner. In the event of a pet or livestock violation, the animal(s) which is in violation may be removed from the owner's property for disposal if prohibited or for a period of one (1) or more weeks if the animal(s) is permitted but is in violation. Enforcement of animal violations will be made only with respect to Beattie Natural Resources Consulting Inc. February, 2001 Wildlife and the Lake Springs Ranch Planned Unit Development Page 17 the express provisions of the Declaration (or as otherwise set forth in the homeowner documents of the Association). Rules and laws of Garfield County shall be enforced by the County. 5. For each additional recurrence of the same type of violation, or if a violation continues beyond sixty (60) days after an owner receives notice, an additional fine will be assessed in an amount equal to double the amount of the previous fine. With respect to a continuing violation, the additional fine will be assessed every four (4) calendar days beyond the sixty (60) day period during which the violation continues. The aggregate amount of fines which may be charged against an owner for the recurrence or continuation of one type of violation shall be $5,000. 6. Each violation of the Declaration, even if based on the same situation or animal, shall be considered a separate offense for the purpose of enforcement. 7. If an owner does not pay a fine which has been assessed due to a violation of the Declaration within thirty (30) days of receipt of the notice to pay the fine, then the late payment or nonpayment shall be considered a separate offense for which the owner can be fined on the same terms as set above. 8. If the Association or its authorized agent(s) knowingly fail to enforce the Declaration, the Association will be in violation and should be fined according to the fine structure outlined in this section. 9. The fines collected under this section my be applied to the costs incurred by the Association to administer and enforce the Declaration. Beattie Natural Resources Consulting Inc. February, 2001 ■vuuuic waw LI lc a_wnc .+yinn,.,,u. aNwz 11.1 a rmil nicu visit vw cvcNnraa ioiciia � WILDLIFE IMPACT FUND I recommend that purchasers of new homes in the Lake Springs Ranch Subdivision be required to pay a one-time or recurring wildlife impact fee to the Lake Springs Ranch Homeowners Association. This fee would be in addition to other initial and recurring fees established by the HOA. The HOA should be required to apply revenue from wildlife impact fees to conservation projects within the subdivision. An example would be planting native vegetation species around ponds and enhancing open space areas for wildlife. The local Colorado Division of Wildlife district wildlife manager or a private consultant can recommend conservation projects. Beattie Natural Resources Consulting Inc February, 2001 Wildlife and the Lake Springs Ranch Planned Unit Development Page 19 • LITERATURE CITED Andrews, R. and R. Righter. 1992. Colorado birds. Denver Mus. Nat. History, Denver, CO. 442pp. Armstrong, D. M. 1971. Distribution of mammals in Colorado. Monogr., Univ. Kansas Mus. Nat. Hist. 3:1-415. Barrows, P., and J. Holmes. 1990. Colorado's wildlife story. Colorado Div. Wildl., Denver, CO. 450pp. Cary, M. 1911. A biological survey of Colorado. N. Amer. Fauna. 33:1-256. Fitzgerald, J. P., C. A. Meaney, and D. M Armstrong. 1994. Mammals of Colorado. Univ. Press Colorado, Niwot, CO. 467pp. Hammerson, G. A. 1986. Amphibians and reptiles in Colorado. Colo. Div. Wildlife, Denver, CO. 131 pp. Warren, E. R. 1941. The mammals of Colorado. Univ. Oklahoma Press, Norman, OK. 330pp. Yarmoloy, C., M. Bayer, and V. Geist. 1988. Behavior responses and reproduction of mule deer following experimental harassment with an all -terrain vehicle. Canadian Field Naturalist 10:425-429. • Beattie Natural Resources Consulting Inc. February, 2001 Wildlife and the Lake Springs Ranch Planned Unit Development Page 20 4) Table 1. Colorado listing of endangered, threatened and wildlife species of special concern. • • Common Name Scientific Name Status' Fish Bonytail Gilaelegans FE, SE Razorback sucker Xyrauchen texanus FE, SE Humpback chub Gila cypa FE, ST Colorado pikeminnow Ptychocheilus lucius FE, ST Greenback cutthroat trout Oncorhycnhus clarki sotmias FT, ST Rio Grande sucker Catostomus plebeius SE Lake chub Couesius plumbeus SE Plains minnow Hybognathus placitius SE Suckermouth minnow Phenacobius mirabilis SE Northern redbelly dace Phoxinus eos SE Southern redbelly dace Phoxinus erythrogaster SE Brassy minnow Hybognathus hankinsoni ST Common shiner Luxilus comutus ST Arkansas darter Etheostoma cragini ST Bluehead sucker Catostomus discobolus SC Flannelmouth sucker Catostomus latipinnis SC Mountain sucker Catostomus platrhynchus SC Plains orangethroat darter Etheostoma spectible SC Iowa darter Etheostoma exile SC Plains topminnow Fundulus sciadicus SC Rio Grande chub Gila pandora SC Colorado roundtail chub Gila robusta SC Speckled chub Macrhybopsis aestivalis tetranemus SC River shiner Notropis blennius SC Stonecat Noturus flavus SC Colorado River cutthroat trout Oncorhynchus clarki pleuriticus SC Rio Grande cutthroat trout Oncorhynchus clarki virginalis SC Flathead chub Platygobio gracilus SC Amphibians Boreal toad Bufo boreas boreas SE Northern cricket frog Acris crepitans SC Great Plains narrowmouth toad Gastrophryne olivacea SC Beattie Natural Resources Consulting Inc. February, 2001 Wildlife and the Lake Springs Ranch Planned Unit Development Page 21 • Table 1. Colorado listing of endangered, threatened and wildlife species of special concern (continued). 1 Common Name Scientific Name Status Amphibians (continued) Canyon treefrog Hyla areicolor ! SC Northern leopard frog Rana pipiens SC Plains leopard frog Rana blairi SC Couch's spadefoot Scaphiopus courchii Great basin spadefoot SSC Spea inteimontana C New Mexico spadefoot Spea multiplicata SC Reptiles Midget faded rattlesnake Crotalus viridis concolor SC Longnose leopard lizard Gambelia wislizenii SC Yellow mud turtle Kinosternon flavenscens SC Common kingsnake Lampropeltis getula SC Texas blind snake Leptotyphlops dulcis SC Texas horned lizard Phrynosoma cornutum SC Desert spiny lizard Sceloporus magister SC Massasauga Sistrurus catenatus SC Birds American peregrine falcon Falco peregrinus anatum SC j Whooping crane Grus americana tabida FE, SE Least tern Sterna antillarum athalassos FE, SE Southwestern willow flycatcher Empidonax traillii extimus FE, SE Plains sharp -tailed grouse Tympanuchus phasianellus jamesii 1 SE Piping plover Charadrius melodus circumcinctus FT, ST Bald eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus FT, ST Mexican spotted owl Strix occidentalis lucida FT, ST Western burrowing owl Athene cunicularia ST Greater sandhill crane Grus canadensis SC Lesser prairie chicken Tympanuchus pallidicinctus ST Barrow's goldeneye Bucephala islandica SC Ferruginous hawk Buteo regalis SC Gunnison's sage grouse Centrocercus urophasianus subspp. SC Northern sage grouse Centrocercus urophasianus subspp. ! SC Western snowy plover Charadrius alexandrinus j SC Mountain plover Chardrius montana SC Long -billed curlew Numenius americanus SC White pelican Pelecanus erythrorhynchos ; SC Beattie Natural Resources Consulting Inc. February, 2001 Wildlife and the Lake Springs Ranch Planned Unit Development Page 22 4, Table 1. Colorado listing of endangered, threatened and wildlife species of special concern (continued). Common Name Scientific Name Status Mammals Gray wolf Canis lupus FE, SE Black -footed ferret Mustela nigripes FE, SE Grizzly bear Ursus arctos FT, SE Preble's meadow jumping mouse Zapus hudsonius preblei FT, ST Lynx Lynx canadensis SE Wolverine Gulo gulo luscus SE River otter Lutra canadensis SE Kit fox Vulpes macrotis SE Swift fox Vulpes velox SC Black -tailed prairie dog Cynomys ludovicianus SC • 1 FE = Federal endangered FT = Federal threatened SE = State endangered ST = State threatened SC = Species of state concern • Beattie Natural Resources Consulting Inc. February, 2001 Wildlife and the Lake Springs Ranch Planned Unit Development Page 23 • Table 2. Federal threatened and endangered species reported for Colorado. • 1 Common Name Scientific Name Status Grizzly bear Ursus arctos Threatened Endangered Bonytail chub Gila elegans Humpback chub Whooping crane Gila cypha Endangered Grus americana Endangered Bald eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Threatnened Black -footed ferret Southwestern willow flycatcher Mustela nigripes Endangered Empidonax traillii extimus Preble's meadow jumping Zapus hudsonius preblei mouse Endangered Threatened Lynx Lynx Canadensis Threatened Mexican spotted owl Strix occidentalis lucida Threatened Piping p Colorado squawfish Ptychocheilus Lucius Endangered Razorback sucker Xyrauchen texanus Endangered Least tern Sterna antillarum Endangered Greenback cutthroat trout Oncorhynchus clarki stomias Threatened over Charadrius melodus Threatened Gray wolf Canis lupus Endangered Mancos milk -vetch Astragalus humillimus Endangered Osterhous milk -vetch Astragalus osterhoutii Endangered Clay -loving wild buckwheat Eriogonum pelinophilum Endangered Penland alpine fen mustard Eutrema penlandii Threatened Dudley Bluffs bladderpod Lesquerella congesta Threatened Knowlton cactus Pediocactus knowltonii Endangered Penland beardtongue Penstemon penlandii Endangered North Park phacelia Phacelia formosula Endangered Dudly Bluffs twinpod Physaria obcordata Threatened Unita Basin hookless cactus Sclerocactus glaucus Threatened Mesa Verde cactus Sclerocactus mease verdae Threatened Ute ladies' -tresses Sprianthes diluvialis Threatened Beattie Natural Resources Consulting Inc. February, 2001 Wildlife and the Lake Springs Ranch Planned Unit Development Page F1 Figure 1. Vicinity map for the Lake Springs Ranch PUD ("SITE"). Beattie Natural Resources Consulting Inc. February, 2001 c(�'•. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR s GEOLOGICAL SURVEY \\ 1 `-;11'11 ' 4w1 Y •••iii/-- �Q `,\ `"' �; .--i _ , ,�•- _ ,+ -2` r r r. • J\• v- `� '_• - -.--- •- !''•' \!-;.- •1 ... '``''•� —+--7�'�, — . \--"J , / r :.rte, 111 .i` �—� i � ��IL: + �\W —.r�_—� T;�•• --2.,:..-2c-1--_----; "reg t __,;----R--1 P- -1 CCLIC7 , ENGLNEER1 C- INC. 1 cARF E'_.2: L Nrr •_ 2,.c , y y 923 CCCPER AVENUE E, gpq�g p.UD. _ CJ FNWOCO SPRINGS. CO 81601 vtC�r w.P :Es. O..w c.c NCE -�E NO. S"EE- (9?3) 945-8676 :R. Odw ': -_ a/e/'-C 200006201 CE Figure 1. Vicinity map for the Lake Springs Ranch PUD ("SITE"). Beattie Natural Resources Consulting Inc. February, 2001 Wildlife and the Lake Springs Ranch Planned Unit Development Page F2 Figure 2. Sketch plan for the Lake Springs Ranch PUD. Beattie Natural Resources Consulting Inc. February, 2001 Wildlife and the Lake Springs Ranch Planned Unit Development Page F3 MOFFAT MO BLANCO 3ARFIELD MESA I MONTROSE 77-�-t; cOU RAY SAN )JIGUEL DOLORES / u� 1 MONTEZUMA /- LA PLATA I ARC RI. -J i MORGAN ( I R, , ACA1.15 yVq$HVNG': N OENvER ARAPAHOE .------�-- 7—� — ---1 -1-- Kir CARSON W ELO SAGUACHE • ELSERT DOUGLAS r LINCOLN i C_ EL PASO I CHEYENNE FREMONT _ _ ___ _ . —I . . r .. KIOWA CAOWLEY 1 CUSTER I Pt; EBLO� __ --�"\// I - OTERO I BENT : PR.CWERS I ALAMOS A11-. HUERFANO '/�.__.-�.___±__---- OE. / ./ I LAS ANIMAS i BACA COSTILLA, – 1---------------1----i TELLER Figure 3. Approximate range of the boreal toad in Colorado (p ). Source: redrawn map obtained from Terry Ireland, Division of Ecological Services, U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Grand Junction, Colorado. Beattie Natural Resources Consulting Inc. February, 2001 Wildlife and the Lake Springs Ranch Planned Unit Development Page F4 Mule Deer ff inter Activity Areas W inte r Activities 111111 Severe W inter Range Winter Concentration Area, Winter Range User -Defined Area County Boundaries ..� ��� �. e � s � � � �- � �- � �. 3� , I im Highways 9 �v`ri F •,9 T ,fie." .tFX%`. R i'' Y t.> + `F1T - ,�.^� " p•v.. P�' $.' td"a" -a fc'a" -4..a.ea2 3 . ...8A5 Si`L.vt Figure 4. System for Conservation Planning (ScOP) mapper mule deer winter activity areas on the Lake Springs Ranch PUD. Beattie Natural Resources Consulting Inc. February, 2001 Wildlife and the Lake Springs Ranch Planned Unit Development Page F5 American Elk Summer Activity Areas Summer Activities TT Production Area 011li1 Summer Concentration Are Summer Range User -Defined Area County Boundaries 1 Highways (:, Figure 5. System for Conservation Planning (ScOP) mapped elk summer activity areas on the Lake Springs Ranch PUD. Beattie Natural Resources Consulting Inc. February, 2001 Wildlife and the Lake Springs Ranch Planned Unit Development Page F6 American Elk Winter Activity Areas Winter Activities as * MOH Severe W n:er Range I i Winter Concentration Area'.'z a^ l,r.»„i Winter Range J User -Defined A;ea /\,/ Yom+ . ayc fl t ^fir` q' j 'i s lf' 1 .p� E- Spm '$ .>• } County B o u n d a ..25 , � `' . } qac '.Y �¢- '� �F' 4 -,e_ Can9�.t3l}�M trt• %aiF w d k a :a..,ee,,.. .:a.a-.,«'4_ nra_ka ti E" 'i'{�ir.• -_•- � �$: y 4'� ''% .'. � '� ?xv.. z-'"` u: .a�'k-"�'IT-.'V±.EPrSa._�a Figure 6. System for Conservation Planning (ScOP) mapped elk winter activity areas on the Lake Springs Ranch PUD. Beattie Natural Resources Consulting Inc. February, 2001 Wildlife and the Lake Springs Ranch Planned Unit Development Page F7 Figure 7. Colorado Division of Wildlife lynx potential habitat (III) map. Source: www. ndis.nrel.colostate.edu/excop/images/maps/lynx.jpg. Beattie Natural Resources Consulting Inc. February, 2001 Wildlife and the Lake Springs Ranch Planned Unit Development Page F8 78 177 105 103 _ 1,'- _ _ `� _ _ / - 38 1 _ _ ? :/� - 150 'Gamow, 1 1 0 50 100 107 105 103 Figure 8. Distribution of the kit fox in Colorado (Fitzgerald et al. 1994:309). Beattie Natural Resources Consulting Inc. February, 2001 Wildlife and the Lake Springs Ranch Planned Unit Development Page F9 Figure 9. Historic distribution of the black -footed ferret in Colorado (go ). Source: Fitzgerald et al. 1994:344. Beattie Natural Resources Consulting Inc. February, 2001 ' 105 103 aC 38 [[ C , j` 1. �}.1ro "r 1. ,i } . . 'I �'ay y "s._ —3E T • s . Cl Y ..91. A f @.,may -r .'4::. �_ —Ir `.!f aL'a�t 1,4;1.1, .. s ,,spkr"scta �Y .r�Rq.` __ ,..Z•774.=.17 s t t b do ioo ,so., t 107 105 103 Figure 9. Historic distribution of the black -footed ferret in Colorado (go ). Source: Fitzgerald et al. 1994:344. Beattie Natural Resources Consulting Inc. February, 2001 Wildlife and the Lake Springs Ranch Planned Unit Development Page F 1 0 Figure 10. Distribution of the northern river otter in Colorado. Open circles represent historic records of occurrence. Solid circles represent restored populations. Source: Fitzgerald et al. 1994:363. Beattie Natural Resources Consulting Inc. February, 2001 107 ':5 100 , r � _ _ _ _ _ _ •- 17- le 5 _ rl-C-7---7 -._, .P.9. • _ • , 30- , - --7. Si --.c7,— 1 -J • __ L[ - IT ==_�4 -0 aIss 107 +05 Figure 10. Distribution of the northern river otter in Colorado. Open circles represent historic records of occurrence. Solid circles represent restored populations. Source: Fitzgerald et al. 1994:363. Beattie Natural Resources Consulting Inc. February, 2001 Wildlife and the Lake Springs Ranch Planned Unit Development Page F11 Winter ■ V • �^---T. `F. , T T - Summer Primary range ■ Confirmed breeding in summer Secondary range ;) Summer nonbreeding site Figure 11. Bald eagle winter and summer range in Colorado (Andrews and Righter 1992:68). Beattie Natural Resources Consulting Inc. February, 2001 Wildlife and the Lake Springs Ranch Planned Unit Development Page F12 Summer 1 T • , l i Winter Figure 12. Summer and winter range of the western burrowing owl in Colorado (Andrews and Righter 1992:177). Beattie Natural Resources Consulting Inc. February, 2001 Wildlife and the Lake Springs Ranch Planned Unit Development Page F13 .1 {, x,�N DGWxu' l WELD UTTE ` \ L&P MEP I i $ PHILLIPS I JACKSON •, ,_ ._ _ GPAN D I I MORGAN i I �,�.t3�OULDc _ _ I YU'6.LA . f \ N ADAl15 I WASHWGTON EAGLE ''-'4 CLEAR' 1 ! ARAPAHOS I —1I wuma`,CREJc. y ..—.- f r•--- 1 i1iT : XIT ARSON I,CUGLAS ELBcAT PARK !TELL -. EL PASO i— C EYENNE FREMON' ,____.-_.—. T-- :. — . K:GWA I. IMONT-. ->--�_ •� :cOM1LEY: I— CUSTEP. ?I:EBLO ....:7---1 SAN MIGUEL ,'KI EJB ' I— \..' ``/ � I OTERC I BE VT PROWERS DOLORES 'SAN I I_ JUAN _ —"'T—'_—_1 cAFANO �•• _ -----------, jAiNE l' ALA7JCSA� / �._-^•_! -=----- RI ' MONTEZUMA AN I GAGA I /I l.A PLATA I COS7ILLA'� L� (MAS y ARCHULETA �� CC4EJOS i SAGUACHE Figure 13. Areas of fairly common migrational sightings of whooping cranes in Colorado (t1). Source: redrawn map obtained from Terry Ireland, Division of Ecological Services, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Grand Junction, Colorado. Beattie Natural Resources Consulting Inc. February, 2001 Wildlife and the Lake Springs Ranch Planned Unit Development Page F14 ROLTTE JACKSON GRAN W I PHILLIPS 1� I — 1A0RGA4 I YUMA I • OGiN 7EDGWICK{ ELD ADAMS WASNWGTCN ENVEA 11 ARAPAHOE • ELBERT i I CCN I I LINGO. I -..�--� Ci-,EYENNE MESA ,CRA L PASO MONTROSE -1-Z _.--.—_.`OURAY •- �\ �'MNSCALEJ� i I ---- t , , CflOWLEY �CwA SAD UAC HE CUSTER PU :LO SAN MIGUEL pOLORES —/ U � -- A--- j HUcfFANO LAmOS J 1-- I RIOGRANDE. MONTEZUMA / COSTILLA V • LA PLATA I ARCHULETA .1 ONEJOS OTERO BENT PROWESS ANIMASI BACA , Figure 14. General range of the Mexican spotted owl in Colorado ). Source: redrawn map obtained from Terry Ireland, Division of Ecological Services, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Grand Junction, Colorado. Beattie Natural Resources Consulting Inc. February, 2001 Wildlife and the Lake Springs Ranch Planned Unit Development Page F15 Historical Distribution • Current Distribution Figure 15. Historic and current distribution of the sharp -tailed grouse in Colorado (t.). Source: Andrews and Righter (1992:93). Beattie Natural Resources Consulting Inc. February, 2001 Wildlife and the Lake Springs Ranch Planned Unit Development Page F16 Summar • Migration Figure 16. Summer and migration habitat for the least tern in Colorado (Andrews and Righter 1992:160). Beattie Natural Resources Consulting Inc. February, 2001 Wildlife and the Lake Springs Ranch Planned Unit Development Page F17 Figure 17. Approximate range of the southwestern willow flycatcher in Colorado (p). Source: map obtained from Terry Ireland, Division of Ecological Services, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Grand Junction, Colorado. Beattie Natural Resources Consulting Inc. February, 2001 Wildlife and the Lake Springs Ranch Planned Unit Development Page F18 Figure 18. Overall range of Preble's meadow jumping mouse (darker shaded area) as reported by the Colorado Division of Wildlife. Source: www.ndis.nrel. colostate.edu/escop/images/maps/pjmovmap.jpg. Beattie Natural Resources Consulting Inc. February, 2001 PROTECTIVE COVENANTS • • • PRELIMINARY DRAFT: SUBJECT TO REVISION DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, s RESTRICTIONS AND EASEMENTS FOR LAKE SPRINGS RANCH PUD • PRELIMINARY DRAFT: SUBJECT TO REVISION DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, RESTRICTIONS AND EASEMENTS FOR LAKE SPRINGS RANCH PUD TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 STATEMENT OF PURPOSE AND IMPOSITION OF COVENANTS 1 1.1 Purpose 1 1.2 Declarant's Intent 1 1.3 Declaration 1 1.4 Covenants to Run with the Land 1 1.5 Association 2 2 DEFINITIONS 2 2.1 Definition Reference 2 2.2 Act 2 • 2.3 Articles of Incorporation 2 2.4 Assessment 2 2.5 Association 2 2.6 Building Envelope 2 2.7 Bylaws 3 2.8 Common Elements 3 2.9 Common Expenses 3 2.10 Declarant 4 2.11 Declaration 4 2.12 Deed of Trust 4 2.13 Development Guidelines 4 2.14 Eligible First Mortgagee 5 2.15 First Mortgagee 5 2.16 Improvements 5 2.17 Lot 5 2.18 Member 5 2.19 Mortgage 5 2.20 Mortgagee 6 2.21 Mortgagor 6 2.22 Occupant 6 2.23 Owner 6 11111 2.24 Person 6 2.25 Plat 6 I:11'\,Berkeley\Lake Spnr;s Rancn Owners Assoaation'Dec:aration for PUD - v2.wcd • • • PRELIMINARY DRAFT: SUBJECT TO REVISION 2.26 Property 6 2.27 Rules and Regulations 6 2.28 Supplemental Plat 7 3 DESCRIPTION OF PLANNED COMMUNITY 7 3.1 Lots 7 3.2 Lot Legal Description 7 3.3 Allocated Interests 7 3.4 Agricultural Reserve 8 4 COMMON ELEMENTS 8 4.1 Use and Enjoyment of Common Elements 8 4.2 Association Regulation of Use of Common Elements 8 4.3 Association to Operate and Maintain Common Elements 9 4.4 No Partition of Common Elements 9 4.5 Owner Liability for Owner or Occupant Damage to Common Elements 9 4.6 Damage or Destruction to Common Elements 10 4.7 Condemnation of Common Elements 10 4.8 Title to Common Elements Upon Dissolution of Association 10 4.9 Mechanic's Liens on Common Elements 10 4.10 Reservation of Excess Capacity in Water System 11 5 EASEMENTS 11 5.1 Recorded Easements 11 5.2 Owner's Easements 11 5.3 Emergency Access Easement 11 5.4 Utility Easements 11 5.5 Common Access Easements 12 5.6 Easements for Incidental Encroachments 12 5.7 Maintenance Easement 12 5.8 Drainage Easement 13 5.9 Construction Easement 13 5.10 Easements Deemed Created 13 6 THE ASSOCIATION 13 6.1 Association 13 6.2 Association Executive Board 13 6.3 Membership 13 6.4 Required Compliance 14 6.5 Voting Rights of Members 14 I: \t'.Berkeiey ,Lake Springs Ranch Owners Association\Declaration for PUD - v2.wpd • PRELIMINARY DRAFT: SUBJECT TO REVISION 6.6 Authority 14 6.7 Powers 14 6.8 Obligations 14 6.9 Water System 15 6.10 Limited Liability 15 6.11 Declarant Control 15 7 ASSESSMENTS 15 7.1 Assessments 15 7.2 Annual Assessments 15 7.3 Apportionment of Assessments 16 7.4 Special Assessments 16 7.5 Default Assessments 16 7.6 Payment of Assessments 16 7.7 Creation of Association Lien and Personal Obligation to Pay Assessments 17 7.8 Effect of Non -Payment of Assessments 17 7.9 Open Space and Wildlife Conservation Fund 18 • 7.10 Working Fund 18 8 PROPERTY USE RESTRICTIONS 18 8.1 General Restriction 18 8.2 Limited Business Activities 19 8.3 Construction and Alteration of Improvements 19 8.4 Compliance With Laws 19 8.5 Nuisance 19 8.6 No Hazardous or Unsafe Activities 19 8.7 Prohibition of Increases in Insurable Risks 19 8.8 Prohibition against Damage or Waste 19 8.9 Obstructions 20 8.10 Vehicles 20 8.11 Obstructions 20 8.12 No Firearms or Hunting 20 8.13 Service Facilities 20 8.14 Maintenance of Landscaping 21 8.15 Natural Vegetation Preservation 21 8.16 Animals and Pets 21 8.17 Signs 22 8.18 Solid Waste 22 • 8.19 Outside Burning 23 8.20 Dust Control 23 'r.11 ,Berkeley\Lake Sprrys Ranch Owners Association\.Decfaration for PUD - v2.wpd • • • PRELIMINARY DRAFT: SUBJECT TO REVISION 8.21 Noise 23 8.22 Odor 23 8.23 Lighting 23 8.24 Wells 23 8.25 Minerals 23 8.26 Excavation or Fill 23 8.27 Drainage and Erosion Control 24 8.28 Vegetation and Noxious Weed Control and Management 24 8.28.1 Prevention and Control 24 8.28.2 Inventory 24 8.28.3 Eradication 24 8.28.4 Owner Responsibility 25 8.29 Wildlife Protection Restrictions 25 9 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 26 9.1 Development Guidelines 26 9.2 Development Review Committee 26 9.3 Meetings and Action of Development Review Committee 27 9.4 Pre -submission Conference 27 9.5 Development Review 27 9.6 Development Review Expenses 28 9.7 Decision of Committee 28 9.8 Prosecution and Completion of Work After Approval 28 9.9 Limitation of Liability 29 10 CONSTRUCTION AND ALTERATION OF IMPROVEMENTS 29 10.1 General 29 10.2 Approval Required 29 10.3 Underground Utility Lines 30 10.4 Size Restrictions of Dwellings 30 10.5 Specific Requirements for Dwellings 30 10.6 Fireplaces and Stoves 30 10.7 Wildfire Prevention 30 10.8 Fences and Hedges 30 10.9 Landscaping 31 10.10 Removal of Nonconforming Improvements 31 11 MAINTENANCE 31 11.1 Owner's Maintenance Responsibility 32 11.2 Owner's Negligence 32 11.3 Association's Maintenance Responsibility 32 C\1\Berkeley \Lake Spnngs Ranch Owners Assoc:at.cnDeaaration for PUD - v2.wpd r • • PRELIMINARY DRAFT: SUBJECT TO REVISION 12 INSURANCE 12.1 Owner's Insurance Responsibility 12.2 Association's Insurance Responsibility 32 32 32 32 33 33 33 12.3 Coverage 12.4 Required Provisions 12.5 Adjustment of Claims 12.6 Copies of Policies 13 RESERVATION OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS 33 13.1 Development and Withdrawal Rights 34 13.2 Construction Easement 34 13.3 Reciprocal Easements 34 13.4 Termination of Development Rights 35 13.5 Interference with Development Rights 35 13.6 Transfer of Development Rights 35 14 SPECIAL DECLARANT RIGHTS 14.1 Special Declarant Rights 14.1.1 Use of Property During Construction 14.1.2 Exercise of Development Rights 14.1.3 Sales, Management and Marketing 14.1.4 Construction Easements 14.1.5 Control of Association and Executive Board 14.1.6 Amendment of Declaration 14.1.7 Amendment of Plat 14.1.8 Signs 14.1.9 Post -Sales 14.2 Additional Reserved Rights 14.2.1 Dedications 14.2.2 Easement Rights 14.2.3 Other Rights 14.3 Limitations on Special Declarant Rights and Additional Reserved 35 35 36 36 36 36 36 36 36 36 37 37 37 37 37 Rights 37 14.4 Interference with Special Declarant Rights 37 14.5 Rights Transferable 37 15 MORTGAGEE PROTECTIONS 38 15.1 Introduction 38 15.2 Percentage of First Mortgagees 38 15.3 Notice of Actions 38 I:\1\Berkeley\Lake Springs Ranch Owners Association'.Declaration for PUD - v2.wpd • • • PRELIMINARY DRAFT: SUBJECT TO REVISION 15.4 Consent Required 38 15.5 Notice of Objection 39 15.6 First Mortgagees' Rights 39 15.6.1 Advances 39 15.6.2 Cure Rights 39 15.7 Limitations on First Mortgagee's Rights 39 15.8 Special Declarant Rights 39 16 ENFORCEMENT OF DECLARATION 39 16.1 Violation Deemed a Nuisance 39 16.2 Compliance 40 16.3 Who May Enforce 40 16.4 Enforcement 40 16.5 Nonliability 40 16.6 Recovery of Costs 40 17 MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 40 17.1 Severability 40 17.2 Construction 41 17.3 Third Party Beneficiary 41 17.4 Condemnation 41 17.5 Headings 41 17.6 Conflicts in Legal Documents 41 17.7 No Public Use Dedication 41 17.8 Notices 41 17.9 Waiver or Delay in Enforcement 42 17.10 Choice of Law and Jurisdiction 42 18 DURATION OF COVENANTS AMENDMENT AND TERMINATION 42 18.1 Term 42 18.2 Amendment of Declaration 42 18.2.1 Reserved Amendment Rights 42 18.2.2 General Amendments 43 18.2.3 Special Amendments 43 18.3 Execution of Amendments: Expenses 43 18.4 When Modifications Permitted 43 18.5 Recording of Amendments 43 18.6 Termination of the Planned Community 43 1 asre..,..e SG,oge anon O«nse ASSOCIallOMDSCINall01, la Pup -v2*IA • PRELIMINARY DRAFT: SUBJECT TO REVISION DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, RESTRICTIONS AND EASEMENTS FOR LAKE SPRINGS RANCH PUD THIS DECLARATION FOR Lake Springs Ranch PUD, to be effective upon its recordation, is made by The Berkeley Family Limited Partnership, a Colorado Limited Partnership ("Declarant") as the owner of certain real property located in the County of Garfield, Colorado, (the "Property") and more particularly described on Exhibit "A" annexed hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 1 STATEMENT OF PURPOSE AND IMPOSITION OF COVENANTS 1.1 Purpose. The purpose of this Declaration is to create a common interest community for the Property, to be known as Lake Springs Ranch PUD (the "Planned Community") by submitting the Property to the provisions of the Colorado Common Interest Ownership Act, Sections 38-33.3-101, et seq., Colorado Revised Statutes, as amended from time to time (the "Act"). • 1.2 Declarant's Intent. Declarant intends to preserve and protect the value, desirability and attractiveness of the Property, to restrain and minimize future impairment or deterioration of the Property and to promote and safeguard the health, comfort, enjoyment, safety, convenience and welfare of persons acquiring an interest in the Property. 1 1.3 Declaration. Therefore, Declarant hereby submits the Property, including all improvements, appurtenances and facilities relating to or located on the Property now and in the future, as a Planned Community under the Act, and hereby declares, makes, imposes and establishes the following covenants, conditions, restrictions, reservations, easements and other provisions (collectively the "Declaration"), upon all of the Property, which from this day forward shall be held, sold, conveyed, encumbered, leased, rented, occupied and improved, subject to this Declaration. 1.4 Covenants to Run with the Land. All provisions of this Declaration shall be covenants running with the land, or as equitable servitudes, as the case may be. The benefits, burdens and other provisions contained in this Declaration shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of all persons or entities having any right, title, or interest in all or any part of the Property, including Declarant, all Owners and their respective heirs, executors, administrators, personal representatives, successors, assigns, families, tenants, guests, employees, contractors, agents, licensees and invitees. I 18...e La.::r.ga Owners Aawcieca,Deciram la PUD - wPE 1 AFTER RECORDING. RETURN TO: Scher.k. Kerst & deWinter. LLP 302 Eighth Street, Sute 310 Glenwood Springs. CO 81601 • • PRELIMINARY DRAFT: SUBJECT TO REVISION 1.5 Association. Declarant has created the Lake Springs Ranch Owners Association, a Colorado nonprofit corporation, its successors and assigns (the "Association") to manage the affairs of the Planned Community. The Association shall serve as the governing body of the Owners, shall hold title to that portion of the real estate within the Planned Community not located within Lots, shall protect, improve, repair, administer, operate, maintain and preserve the Common Elements, shall administer and enforce this Declaration, including, without limitation, collecting and disbursing the assessments and charges created under this Declaration. 2 DEFINITIONS 2.1 Definition Reference. The definitions set forth in Section 38-33.3-103 of the Act shall be used to interpret the provisions of this Declaration. The terms enclosed with quotation marks which appear throughout this Declaration shall be used as abbreviations for the referenced item when the item appears elsewhere in this Declaration. All definitions set forth in this Declaration shall supplement the definitions in the Act and in the event of conflict between the definitions provided in this Declaration and the Act, the Act shall control. 2.2 Act. "Act" shall mean the Colorado Common Interest Ownership Act as provided in C.R.S. 38-33.3-101, et seq., as the same may be amended from time to time. 2.3 Articles of Incorporation. "Articles of Incorporation" or "Articles" means the Articles of Incorporation of Lake Springs Ranch Owners Association, which have been or will be filed in the office of the Secretary of State of the State of Colorado, and as the same may be amended from time to time. 2.4 Assessment. "Assessment" means an Annual Assessment, Special Assessment or Default Assessment, all of which shall be a Common Expense Liability as defined by the Act. 2.5 Association. "Association" means the Lake Springs Ranch Owners Association, a Colorado nonprofit corporation, its successors and assigns. 2.6 Building Envelope. "Building Envelope" means that portion of each Lot which is depicted and designated as the Building Envelope on a Plat. All structural Improvements shall be located within the Building Envelope on a Lot, except that driveways, walks, pathways, other similar features, fences, underground utilities, irrigation and drainage systems, and landscaping may be located outside the • Building Envelope. I ,1 deraebYiae =pings Ran Owners Asexieuan'Deciaawn ler RUO • .2 rod 2 • • • PRELIMINARY DRAFT: SUBJECT TO REVISION 2.7 Bylaws. "Bylaws" means the Bylaws of the Association which have been or will be adopted by the Executive Board of the Association, as the same may be amended from time to time. 2.8 Common Elements. "Common Elements" means all portions of the real estate in the Property owned by the Association other than Lots including all Improvements and amenities and personal property thereon or associated therewith, which shall be held by the Association for the use, enjoyment and benefit of the Owners. The Common Elements include, but are not limited to, (i) all portions of the Property designated in this Declaration, or any Supplemental Declaration or on a Plat or any Supplemental Plat as Common Area, (ii) all easements created or reserved on any Plat or Supplemental Plat, or in this Declaration or in any Supplemental Declaration, or in any separate agreement, for the use and benefit of the Association, and (iii) any water rights, ditch rights and/or water production, treatment, storage and delivery facilities (or interests therein) that may be owned by the Association or which the Association may be entitled to use. 2.9 Common Expenses. "Common Expenses" means any expenditures made or liabilities incurred by or on behalf of the Association, together with any allocations to reserves, including, but not limited to the following: (a) Costs of maintenance, management, operation. repair and replacement of the Common Elements; (b) Costs of Improvements constructed from time to time by the Association on the Common Elements; (c) Costs of maintaining the utility systems owned by the Association and the costs of making capital repairs and replacements therein; (d) Costs of management and administration of the Association, including, but not limited to, compensation paid by the Association to managers, accountants, attorneys and employees; (e) Costs of utilities and services (including, but not limited to, treated or untreated water, electricity, gas, sewer, trash pick-up and disposal and recycling), which are provided to the Association or the Planned Community and not individually metered or assessed to Lots, landscaping maintenance, and other services which generally benefit and enhance the value and desirability of the Planned Community and which are provided by or on behalf of the Association; (f) Insurance premiums on policies maintained by the Association as required or permitted herein; Be. Sorng. Rmcn G+rsa <aaoc+v pec Ice PUD 3 • • • PRELIMINARY DRAFT: SUBJECT TO REVISION (g) Reasonable reserves for contingencies, replacements and other proper purposes as deemed appropriate by the Executive Board to meet anticipated costs and expenses including, but not limited to, maintenance, repair and replacement of those capital items owned by the Association which must be maintained, repaired or replaced on a periodic basis; Costs of bonding the members of the Executive Board, the officers of the Association, any professional managing agent or any other Person handling the funds of the Association; Taxes paid by the Association; Unpaid Assessments; Amounts paid by the Association for discharge of any lien or encumbrance levied against the Common Elements; Costs incurred by the Development Review Committee, and by any other committees that may be established from time to time by the Executive Board; Other expenses reasonably incurred by the Association for any reason whatsoever in connection with the Common Elements, or the costs of any other item or service provided or performed by the Association pursuant to this Declaration, the Articles or Bylaws of the Association, applicable Rules and Regulations, or the Development Guidelines, or in furtherance of the purposes of the Association or in the discharge of any duties or powers of the Association. 2.10 Declarant. "Declarant" means The Berkeley Family Limited Partnership, a Colorado Limited Partnership, its successors and assigns. A person shall be deemed to be a "successor and assign" of Declarant if specifically designated as such in a duly recorded instrument but only as to the expressly designated matters contained in such an instrument. 2.11 Declaration. "Declaration" means this instrument, together with any supplement or amendment and any other recorded instrument however denominated, that exercises a Development Right, executed and recorded by Declarant. The term Declaration includes all Plats recorded with this Declaration and all amendments and supplements to such Plats without specific reference thereto. 2.12 Deed of Trust. "Deed of Trust" means a Deed of Trust or a Mortgage. 2.13 Development Guidelines. "Development Guidelines" means the rules, procedures, standards, guidelines and requirements promulgated from time to time by the Development Review Committee, and all amendments thereto, governing the ,1 s>..P,•i.+. sem. ...sewn owner. n..oc„wneki..,o. > L,o ..: we 4 1 • • PRELIMINARY DRAFT: SUBJECT TO REVISION review and approval or disapproval of proposed Improvements within the Planned Community. 2.14 Eligible First Mortgagee. "Eligible First Mortgagee" means a First Mortgagee that has notified the Association in writing of its name and address and status as a First Mortgagee and has requested that it receive mortgagee protection notices as provided in this Declaration. 2.15 First Mortgagee. "First Mortgagee" means a holder of a mortgage on a Lot which is the first and most senior of the Mortgages on such Lot. 2.16 Improvements."Improvementsfl means any improvements, structural or otherwise, alterations, additions, repairs, excavation, grading, landscaping or other work which in any way alter any property within the Planned Community, or the improvements located thereon, from its natural or improved state existing on the date this Declaration was recorded, including, but not limited to, dw,velling units, buildings, outbuildings, additions, swimming pools, patio covers, awnings, the painting or other change of any exterior surfaces of any visible structure, walkways, outdoor sculptures or artwork, sprinkler or irrigation systems, garages. carports, roads, driveways, parking areas, ponds, ditches, fences, screening walls, retaining walls, stairs. decks, flag poles, fixtures. landscaping (including the addition, alteration or removal of any tree, shrub or other vegetation), hedges. windbreaks, plantings, planted trees and shrubs, gardens, poles, signs, tanks. solar equipment, wind harnessing or other energy generating equipment, exterior air conditioning, water softener fixtures, utilities, antennae and satellite dishes or receivers. Once an Improvement has been constructed or accomplished on a property within the Planned Community, any subsequent alteration of or addition to or removal of that Improvement shall also constitute an "Improvement" hereunder. "Improvements" do not include repairs or alterations which do not change exterior colors or exterior appearances. 2.17 Lot. "Lot" means any part of the Property which is designated as a Lot upon a Plat, together with all Improvements thereon and appurtenances thereto. For purposes of conforming the terms and provisions of this Declaration to the terms and conditions of the Act, the term "Lot" as used in this Declaration shall be analogous to the terms "Unit" as that term is defined in the Act. 2.18 Member. "Member" means each Lot or Unit Owner, including Declarant. 2.19 Mortgage. "Mortgage" means any mortgage, deed of trust or other security instrument. given voluntarily by the Owner of a Lot, creating a real property security L ramtdevL.we Sdm gum for PVC,- 2 *co 5 • • • PRELIMINARY DRAFT: SUBJECT TO REVISION interest in a Lot and duly recorded in the records of the Clerk and Recorder of Garfield County. The term "Mortgage" does not mean a statutory, tax or judicial lien. The term "Deed of Trust" when used herein shall be synonymous with the term "Mortgage." 2.20 Mortgagee. "Mortgagee" means a mortgagee under a Mortgage or a beneficiary under a Deed of Trust, as the case may be, and the assignees of such Mortgagee. 2.21 Mortgagor. "Mortgagor" means the maker, obligor or grantor of a Mortgage. The term "Mortgagor" includes a trustor or grantor under a Deed of Trust. 2.22 Occupant. "Occupant" means any Person who is present within the Planned Community as a family member, tenant, servant, employee, agent, licensee, guest or invitee of an Owner. 2.23 Owner. "Owner" means the Person, including Declarant, or. if more than one, all Persons collectively, who hold fee simple title of record to a Lot, (including contract sellers but excluding contract buyers) but excluding any Person holding only a security interest in a Lot unless and until such Person has acquired fee simple title to the Lot. The term "Owner" shall be analogous to the term "Unit Owner", as that term is defined in the Act. 2.24 Person. "Person" means a natural person, a corporation, a partnership, a limited liability company, an association, a trust, or any other legal entity or any combination thereof. 2.25 Plat. "Plat" means the Final Plat of Lake Springs Ranch PUD, as recorded , 200_ at Reception No. in the Office of the Clerk and Recorder of Garfield County, Colorado, as said Final Plat may be amended from time to time. By this reference, said Final Plat is incorporated in this Declaration . Inasmuch as the Property will be platted and developed in phases, the term "Plat" also means any supplemental plat recorded by Declarant and all recorded amendments thereto. 2.26 Property.. "Property" means the real property described on the attached Exhibit "A" 2.27 Rules and Regulations. "Rules and Regulations" means written standards adopted, amended, supplemented, suspended, repealed and otherwise promulgated from time to time by the Executive Board, as provided by this Declaration for the management, preservation, safety, control and orderly operation I'1 6rheivela. Saa.g. :a.cn Owns. A..onaomkOeclaavm ,n PUO v2 6 • L PRELIMINARY DRAFT: SUBJECT TO REVISION of the Planned Community in order to effectuate the intent and to enforce the obligations set forth in this Declaration. 2.28 Supplemental Plat. "Supplemental Plat" means any land survey plat which is Recorded by Declarant for the purpose of describing subsequent phases of the Planned Community. 3 DESCRIPTION OF PLANNED COMMUNITY 3.1 Lots. The Property is hereby divided into a maximum of 194 single family Lots and 4 multi -family Lots (of not more than 4 dwellings per each such Lot) and the balance of the Property shall be allocated to the Common Elements, including an Agricultural Reserve. All Lots shall be developed for residential purposes only in conformance with this Declaration. Such multi -family Lots may be owned in the form of condominium, townhouse or apartment ownership and upon such development, each separate residence shall constitute a Lot under this Declaration. Identification numbers and boundaries of each Lot shall be shown on the Plat, or Supplemental Plats, depicting each Lot as surveyed. • 3.2 Lot Legal Description. Subsequent to the recording of this Declaration and the Plat, contracts to convey, instruments of conveyance, and all other instruments affecting title to a Lot shall be in substantially the following form, subject to such changes or other provisions as may be required by any law, practice or usage: • Lot , Lake Springs Ranch PUD, according to the Plat recorded , 200, as Reception No. and the Declaration of Covenants, Conditions, Restrictions and Easements for Lake Springs Ranch PUD recorded , 200, as Reception No. in the office of the Clerk and Recorder of Garfield County, Colorado. Every instrument of conveyance, security interest or other document affecting the title to a Lot which legally describes the Lot substantially in the manner stated above shall be construed to include the Lot, all fixtures and improvements contained in such Lot and to incorporate all rights, powers, duties and liabilities incident to the ownership of a Lot described in this Declaration. 3.3 Allocated Interests. The Common Expense Liability of each Lot shall be determined by dividing the total number of Lots which have been described on a final plat duly recorded as of the date of calculation into 1 (e.g. 1/200 Lots = .005) and the result then multiplied by the applicable Common Expenses or Assessment I8&FeleyLae aping. Rash Owns• A• eza.onDalamian for •v2 wpd 7 • • • PRELIMINARY DRAFT: SUBJECT TO REVISION to determine each Lot's share of the same. For the purpose of determining votes in the Association, each Lot shall be allocated one vote. 3.4 Agricultural Reserve. The Agricultural Reserve depicted on the Plat is reserved to Declarant for agricultural activities and pursuits including the cultivation of agricultural crops and rearing of livestock for profit. No Owner shall have any right in or power with respect to the Agricultural Reserve, the use and enjoyment of which is reserved exclusively to Declarant. Inasmuch as it is the declared policy of the State of Colorado to conserve, protect and increase the development and improvement of agricultural lands for the production of agricultural products, and a portion of the Property will remain in agricultural production for an indefinite period of time, all Owners are charged with notice that certain portions of the Property are agricultural lands upon which agricultural operations have been continuing for more than one (1) year prior to the date of recordation of this Declaration. In accordance with applicable Colorado law, no such agricultural operations shall be deemed a private or public nuisance by reasons of development of the Property or any other changed condition in or about the vicinity of the agricultural operation, except in the case of (a) the negligent operation of the agricultural use, (b) a change of the agricultural operation which would result in a private or public nuisance, or (c) upon a substantial increase in the size of the agricultural operation. 4 COMMON ELEMENTS 4.1 Use and Enjoyment of Common Elements. Except as otherwise provided in this Declaration, each Owner shall have the non-exclusive right to use and enjoy the Common Elements in common with all other Owners for all purposes for which such Common Elements were established, and as required for purposes of access and ingress to and egress from Owner's Lot or Common Elements available for the Owner's use. This right to use and enjoy the Common Elements shall extend to each Owner and Occupant and shall be appurtenant to each Lot, subject at all times to the provisions of this Declaration (including Declarant's reserved rights hereunder), the Articles, Bylaws and Rules and Regulations. No Owner or Occupant shall place any structure upon the Common Elements, nor shall any Owner or Occupant engage in any activity which will temporarily or permanently impair free and unobstructed access to all parts of the Common Elements by all Owners. 4.2 Association Regulation of Use of Common Elements. The Association, acting through the Executive Board, shall have the right and authority to regulate the use of the Common Elements by the promulgation, enforcement and interpretation from time to time of such Rules and Regulations as the Association considers necessary 1 '1,Be&kSe, LSAe Sp.•g, Ranch Owners Aswcea cmDeclsatce for PUO - v2 wPd 8 • • • PRELIMINARY DRAFT: _-'_.:EJECT TO RE •. ION or appropriate for the protection and preservation of the Common Elements G c4 the enhancement of the use and enjoyment thereof by the Owners and Occupants. Such Rules and Regulations may include, without limitation, restrictions on uses of the Common Elements for environmental preservation purposes such as protection and enhancement of wildlife corridors, winter wildlife ranges and natural wildlife habitat. The Association, acting through the Executive Board, may suspend the right of any Member Not in Good Standing to use and enjoy the Common Elements. A "Member Not in Good Standing" means a Member who is delinquent in the payment of Assessments or is in violation of the terms and provisions of this Declaration, the Articles, Bylaws, Rules and Regulations orthe terms and provisions of any approvals granted by the Development Review Committee. 4.3 Association to Operate and Maintain Common Elements. The Association shall operate and maintain the Common Elements in good condition and shall repair and replace as necessary, roads, the domestic water system, irrigation facilities and other Improvements on the Common Elements. The Association shall construct, alter and remove such Improvements and landscaping upon the Common Elements as the Association in its discretion considers necessary, desirable or appropriate from time to time. and shall do all such other and further acts which the Executive Board deems necessary or appropriate to preserve, protect and enhance the Common Elements in accordance with the general objectives for the Planned Community as reflected in this Declaration. The Association shall adopt and implement effective control and management of noxious weeds which appear on the Common Elements. 4.4 No Partition of Common Elements. No Owner or other Person shall have any right to partition or to seek the partition of the Common Elements or any part thereof. 4.5 Owner Liability for Owner or Occupant Damage to Common Elements. Each Owner shall be liable to the Association for any damage to Common Elements or for any expense, loss or liability suffered or incurred by the Association in connection with the Common Elements arising from (a) the negligence or willful misconduct of such Owner or of any Occupant of such Owner, or (b) any violation by such Owner or any Occupant of such Owner of any law, regulation, or code, including without limitation any environmental law, or of any provisions of this Declaration or the Rules and Regulatcns relating to the Common Elements. Each Owner shall indemnify, defend and hold the Association harmless from any loss, damage, expense or liability arising from the circumstances described in subparts (a) or (b) immediately above. The Association shall have the power to levy and collect a Default Assessment against an Owner to recover the costs, expenses, OerikaeyLoe 3cohngs ,LrIcnOveneisA&,.xa C ..o'aa_2 .2 9 • • PRELIMINARY DRAFT: SUBJECT TO REVISION damages, losses or liabilities incurred by the Association as a consequence of any such negligence, wilful misconduct or violation. 4.6 Damage or Destruction to Common Elements. In the event of damage to or destruction of the Common Elements, including Improvements thereon, by fire or other casualty, the Association shall repair or replace the same in accordance with the provisions of this Declaration. 4.7 Condemnation of Common Elements. If any Common Elements or part thereof or interest therein is taken under exercise of the power of eminent domain or by purchase in lieu thereof, the portion of any award in condemnation or the price payable for the deed in lieu that is attributable to the Common Elements taken or purchased shall be paid to the Association. The Association shall have the exclusive right to participate in such condemnation proceedings and to represent the interests of all Owners and other interested Persons therein. Any award or funds received by the Association shall be held by the Association as a reserve for future maintenance, repair, reconstruction, or replacement of Common Elements or may be used for Improvements or additions to or operation of Common Elements or for such other uses as may be deemed appropriate by the Executive Board. Except as may otherwise be provided by the Act, no Owner or other Person shall be entitled to participate as a party or otherwise in any condemnation proceedings nor to receive any proceeds therefrom. 4.8 Title to Common Elements Upon Dissolution of Association. In the event of dissolution of the Association, the Common Elements shall, to the extent permitted by law and reasonably possible, be conveyed or transferred to an appropriate public, governmental or quasi governmental agency or organization or to a nonprofit corporation, association, trust, or other organization, to be used, in any such event, for the common benefit of Owners for the purposes for which the Common Elements were held by the Association. If the foregoing is not possible, the Common Elements shall be sold or disposed of and the proceeds from the sale or disposition shall be distributed to Owners in proportion to each Owner's Allocated Interest in the Common Expenses of the Association. 4.9 Mechanic's Liens on Common Elements. Declarant shall be responsible for the release of mechanics' liens filed with respect to Common Elements, or any part thereof, if such liens arise from labor performed or materials furnished at the instance of Declarant, its agents, contractors or subcontractors. Likewise, the Association shall be responsible for the release of mechanics' liens filed with respect to Common Elements, or any part thereof, if such liens arise from labor performed or materials furnished at the instance of the Association, its directors, 3a.xYL.Me3 s Ranch Ossars Amax., P.,o • wad 10 • • • PRELIMINARY DRAFT: SUBJECT TO REVISION officers, agents, contractors or subcontractors. No labor performed or materials furnished with respect to a Lot at the instance of the Owner shall be the basis for filing a lien against the Common Elements. No labor performed or materials furnished with respect to the Common Elements at the instance of the Executive Board shall be the basis for filing a lien against any Lot. 4.10 Reservation of Excess Capacity in Water System. To the maximum extent and duration permitted by law, Declarant reserves the right to use excess capacity of the water system, water and water rights, well and well rights, ditch and ditch rights, pumps, tanks, pipelines and other equipment, fixtures and water supply facilities necessary for the exercise of any existing or subsequently decreed water rights or augmentation plans together with any easements necessary for the utilization of the same and to add to such water system or water rights as Declarant deems appropriate, to amend or change any water court decree, and to substitute water source or amount of water in any water right as may be subsequently decreed. The utilization of such excess capacity shall be limited to the Property, including without limitation agricultural operations of Declarant. 5 EASEMENTS 5.1 Recorded Easements. The Property shall be subject to all easements shown on the Plat and to any other easements of record as of the date of the recordation of this Declaration. 5.2 Owner's Easements. Each Owner shall have an easement of enjoyment in the Common Elements, subject to the limitations set forth in this Declaration, which shall be appurtenant to and shall pass with the title to each Lot, including the right of access to and from such Owner's Lot. 5.3 Emergency Access Easement. A general easement is hereby granted to all police, sheriff, fire protection, ambulance and all other similar emergency agencies or persons to enter upon the Property in the proper performance of their duties. 5.4 Utility Easements. Declarant reserves to Declarant and hereby grants to the Association general non-exclusive easements upon, across, over, in and under the Common Elements and those portions of Lots not contained within a Building Envelope. Such easements may be used for ingress and egress and for installation, replacement, repair and maintenance of all utilities, including but not limited to water, sewer, gas, telephone, television and electrical systems. By virtue of this Easement, it shall be expressly permissible and proper for the companies providing electrical, telephone and other communication services to install and i , e.,e.erL.e Spmg. R -o 'Donors As..ss,DecW.. , PVD • v2 •tc 11 • • • PRELIMINARY DRAFT: SUBJECT TO REVISION maintain necessary electrical, communications and telephone wires, circuits, and conduits in any the easement. No utility shall be installed or relocated on the surface of any Lot, except for necessary surface facilities. Such utilities may be installed temporarily above ground during construction. Any utility company using this general easement shall use its best efforts to install and maintain the utilities provided for without disturbing the uses of the Owners, the Association and Declarant; shall pursue its installation and maintenance activities as promptly and expeditiously as possible; and shall restore the surface to its original condition when possible after completion of its work. Should any utility company furnishing a service covered by this general easement request a specific easement by separate recordable document, either Declarant or the Association shall have, and are hereby given, the right and authority to grant such easement upon, across, over or under any part of the Property without conflicting with the terms of this Declaration. This general easement shall in no way affect, avoid, extinguish or modify any other recorded easement on the Property. All service connections to (including transformers) primary utility lines serving each Lot shall be the responsibility of the Owner. 5.5 Common Access Easements. In the event a common driveway provides access to more than one Lot, Declarant hereby grants to the Owners of the Lots served by such common access way, a nonexclusive easement for ingress and egress purposes over in across those portions of such Lots which are used for such driveway. No Owner enjoying such a shared access way shall hinder or prevent reasonable access by any other Owner. 5.6 Easements for Incidental Encroachments. If any portion of an Improvement constructed within the Common Elements (for example, any portion of a road) encroaches on any Lot, including any future encroachments arising or resulting from the repair or reconstruction of an Improvement, a valid easement on the surface and for subsurface support below such surface and for the maintenance of same, so long as it stands, shall and does exist for such incidental encroachment. 5.7 Maintenance Easement. An easement is hereby reserved to Declarant and granted to the Association upon, across, over, in and under the Property and a right to make such use of the Property as may be necessary or appropriate to make emergency repairs or to perform the duties and functions which the Association is obligated or permitted to perform pursuant to this Declaration or the Act, including the right to enter upon any Lot for the purpose of performing maintenance or repair of any utility service, including without limitation, any actions in respect to the water distribution system. Reasonable efforts shall be made to use this easement so as minimize the disturbance of any affected Owner by prosecuting any necessary work ,t BaeebrLdee Spnngs Ranch Owra a Asecaarur\Declaal,n is PUD • v: wpa 12 • • • PRELIMINARY DRAFT: SUBJECT TO REVISION promptly and expeditiously, limiting interference with existing Improvements; and restoring any affected areas to the condition existing before the work as soon as possible following such work. 5.8 Drainage Easement. An easement is reserved to Declarant and granted to the Association, its officers, agents, employees, successors and assigns to enter upon, across, over, in and under any portion of the Property for changing, correcting or otherwise modifying any existing drainage channels on the Property to protect the historic drainage pattern of water. 5.9 Construction Easement. An easement is reserved to Declarant for construction purposes on the Common Elements including, without limitation, the right of traverse and storage of materials and equipment, as may be necessary or incidental to the construction of Improvements on the Property. 5.10 Easements Deemed Created. All conveyances of any part of the Property made after the date of this Declaration, whether by Declarant or otherwise, shall be construed to grant and reserve the easements contained in this Article though no specific reference to such easements or to this Declaration appears in the instrument for such conveyance. 6 THE ASSOCIATION 6.1 Association. The Association has been formed as a Colorado nonprofit corporation under the Colorado Nonprofit Corporation Act to manage the affairs of the Planned Community. The Association shall serve as the governing body for all of the Owners for the protection, improvement, alteration, maintenance, repair, replacement, administration and operation of the Common Elements, the levying and collection of Assessments for Common Expenses, and such other matters as may be provided in this Declaration, the Articles, Bylaws, and Rules and Regulations. The Association shall not be deemed to be conducting a business of any kind, and all funds received by the Association shall be held and applied by it for the Owners in accordance with the provisions of this Declaration, the Articles and the Bylaws. 6.2 Association Executive Board. The affairs of the Association shall be managed by an Executive Board. The number, term, and qualifications of the members of the Executive Board shall be fixed in the Articles of Incorporation or the Bylaws. 6.3 Membership. Every person, by virtue of being a Owner and while such person is a Owner, shall be a member of the Association and shall remain a member for the period of the Owner's ownership of a Lot. Membership shall be appurtenant to and 1: 8attleylae SpingS Rae, Onn Aeaxea+an\Declaawn la PLD -+2 wpe 13 • • • PRELIMINARY DRAFT: SUBJECT TO REVISION may not be separated from ownership of any Lot. No Owner, whether one or more persons or entities, shall have more than one membership per Lot owned, but all of the persons or entities owning a Lot shall be entitled to rights of membership and use and enjoyment appurtenant to such ownership. Declarant shall hold a Membership in the Association for each Lot owned by Declarant. 6.4 Required Compliance. The benefits and burdens of membership in the Association touch and concern the Property and shall be covenants running with each Lot for the benefit of all other Lots. Each Owner shall adhere to and benefit from the obligations contained in the Association's Articles, Bylaws and adopted resolutions. 6.5 Voting Rights of Members. Each Lot in the Planned Community shall be entitled to one (1) vote in the Association, i.e., one (1) vote per Owner/Member. 6.6 Authority. The business affairs of the Planned Community shall be managed by the Executive Board of the Association (herein the "Executive Board"), which shall be governed by the Association's Articles of Incorporation, Bylaws and this Declaration, as the same may be amended from time to time. The Executive Board may adopt, amend, supplement, suspend, repeal and otherwise promulgate Rules and Regulations for the use of the Common Elements, easements, roads and access ways, central water system, and general management, preservation, safety, control and orderly operation of the Planned Community. 6.7 Powers. The Association shall have all of the powers, authority and duties necessary to manage the business and affairs of the Planned Community and the Association, express or implied, as permitted under applicable law including without limitation, the relevant provisions of the Act as well as the Colorado Nonprofit Corporation Act, as such laws may be amended from time to time, subject only to the limitations upon such powers as are contained in this Declaration. More specifically, and without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the Association shall have all of the powers and duties necessary (i) for the administration, maintenance, management, governance and operation of the Planned Community and the Association and (ii) to own, operate, improve, maintain, repair, manage, lease, encumber, and otherwise deal with the Common Elements. 6.8 Obligations. The Association shall perform all duties and obligations expressly imposed upon it by this Declaration, the Act and the Colorado Nonprofit Corporation Act or implied by an express provision in this Declaration. The Association shall accept title to any real property, including without limitation, water rights, as well as rO.,k.Wlsw Sang. Ranch Owns, A.•00& , Oenaswn to PUO . .2 14 • • • PRELIMINARY DRAFT: SUBJECT TO REVISION any Improvements and personal property thereon including water systems and related facilities transferred to the Association by Declarant. 6.9 Water System. The Association shall own, operate and maintain the potable water supply system for the Planned Community. Water service to each Lot shall be metered by devices approved by the Association, which devices shall be installed and maintained at the sole cost of the Owner. The Association shall establish potable water service rate schedules sufficient to pay all costs and expenses of administering, operating, maintaining, improving and preserving the central water system including all water rights associated therewith. The Association shall have the power to charge and collect water service fees from Owners benefitted by such service. The Association shall adopt, supplement and amend Water Service Rules and Regulations for the provision of potable water service to Owners, which shall include the power to terminates water service to any Lot for nonpayment all service charges. In addition, water service charges to a Lot shall be a personal obligation of the affected Owner and treated as an Assessment under the provisions of this Declaration. The Association shall comply with and, with respect to the Owners, be empowered to enforce all regulations promulgated by the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment and any other governmental agency having jurisdiction over the water supply system, including without limitation, the prevention all of hazardous cross connections. Each Lot shall be limited to not more than 2,500 square feet of outside lawn and garden irrigated area. 6.10 Limited Liability. The Association, the members of the Executive Board, members of the Development Review Committee and the Association's officers shall not be liable to any Owner or Occupant or to any other Person for any act or omission except for wanton and willful acts or omissions. 6.11 Declarant Control. Declarant shall have all the powers reserved in Section 38- 33.3-303(5) of the Act to appoint and remove officers and members of the Executive Board to the full extent and for the maximum period of time stated in the Act. 7 ASSESSMENTS 7.1 Assessments. The Association shall levy annual, special and default assessments ("Assessments") pursuant to this Declaration for the purpose of payment of Common Expenses. 7.2 Annual Assessments. The Association shall levy annual Assessments based upon the budget of the Association's anticipated cash requirements for Common Expenses of the Planned Community as required by the Act and this Declaration for 1 lBe Sev`Lse _>,. t Rancn Demers Assoumm,Decda soon !or PUD -+2 wyd 15 r PRELIMINARY DRAFT: SUBJECT TO REVISION the coming fiscal year. Any surplus funds of the Association remaining after payment of or provision for Common Expenses and any prepayment of or provision for reserves shall be credited to the Owners in proportion to their Common Expense Liability or credited to them to reduce their future Assessments for Common Expenses. 7.3 Apportionment of Assessments. The total annual Assessments for any fiscal year of the Association shall be allocated and assessed against Lots based on dividing the total number of platted Lots into one (1); e.g. 1/210 = .004762 subject to: (a) any Common Expenses which are separately metered or are assessed to the Lots by third parties, (b) Common Expenses or portions thereof benefitting fewer than all of the Lots which shall be assessed exclusively against the Lots benefitted, (c) any increased cost of insurance based upon risk which shall be assessed to Lots in proportion to the risk, and (d) any Common Expense caused by the misconduct of any Owner, which may be assessed exclusively (or on such other equitable basis as the Executive Board shall determine) against such Owner. All such allocations of Common Expense Liability to Lots on a basis other than the Lots' percentage of Common Expense Liability shall be made in writing by the Executive Board. • 7.4 Special Assessments. In addition to the annual Assessments authorized above, the Executive Board may, at any time and from time to time, levy and assess in any fiscal year a special Assessment for the purpose of defraying, in whole or in part, unbudgeted costs, fees and expenses of any construction, reconstruction, repair, removal, replacement, renovation or other maintenance of the Common Elements in the Planned Community. Amounts levied and assessed pursuant to this Section shall be assessed to the Lots in the proportions set forth above. • 7.5 Default Assessments. All costs of enforcement of this Declaration which costs are incurred with respect to a Owner or any other expense of the Association which is the obligation of a Owner pursuant to this Declaration shall become a default Assessment assessed against the Owner's Lot. Notice of the amount and demand for payment of such default Assessment shall be sent in writing to the Owner prior to enforcing any remedies for nonpayment hereunder. 7.6 Payment of Assessments. Until the Association makes an Assessment for Common Expenses, Declarant shall pay all Common Expenses. After an Assessment has been made by the Association and unless otherwise determined by the Executive Board, annual and special Assessments shall be payable in monthly installments equal to 1/12 of the then current Assessment, without notice (except for the initial notice of any special Assessment) and shall be due on the first 11'Beeee,Late Songs Kann Owners Ass¢ nm,Dede won ie PUD: v2 ..pa 16 • • • PRELIMINARY DRAFT: SUBJECT TO REVISION day of each month at the office of the Association. Default Assessments shall be due in full ten (10) days after notice is given to the Owner of the amount owed. 7.7 Creation of Association Lien and Personal Obligation to Pay Assessments. Declarant, for each Lot, hereby covenants, and each Owner of any Lot, by acceptance of a deed therefor, whether or not it shall be so expressed in any such deed, are deemed to covenant and agree to pay to the Association annual, special and default Assessments applicable to the Lot. Such Assessments, as well as any fees, charges, late charges, attorney fees, fines and interest charged by the Association shall be the personal obligation of the Owner as of the time when the Assessment or other charges became or fell due. Two or more Owners of a Lot shall be jointly and severally liable for such obligations. The personal obligation to pay any past due sums due the Association shall not pass to a successor in title unless expressly assumed by the successor. By acceptance of the deed or other instrument of transfer of a Lot, each Owner irrevocably waives the homestead exemption provided by C.R.S. 38-41-201 et seq., as amended. Each Assessment shall be a continuing lien upon the Lot against which such Assessment is made. A lien under this Section is prior to all other liens and encumbrances on a Lot except: (a) liens and encumbrances recorded before the recordation of this Declaration; (b) a security interest on the Lot which has priority over all other security interests on the Lot and which was recorded before the date on which the Assessment sought to be enforced became delinquent; and (c) liens for real estate taxes and other governmental assessments or charges against the Lot. This Section shall not prohibit any civil action to recover sums for which this Section creates a lien or prohibit the Association from taking a deed in lieu of foreclosure. Sale or transfer of a Lot shall not affect the Association's lien thereon, except that sale or transfer of a Lot pursuant to foreclosure of any first lien security interest, or any proceeding in lieu thereof, including deed in lieu of foreclosure, or cancellation or forfeiture shall only extinguish the Association's lien as provided in the Act. No such sale, transfer, foreclosure, nor cancellation or forfeiture shall relieve a Lot from continuing liability for any Assessments thereafter becoming due, nor from the lien thereof. 7.8 Effect of Non -Payment of Assessments. If any installment of an Assessment is not be paid within ten (10) days after it becomes due and payable, the Executive Board may assess a late charge of up to five percent (5%) of each past due installment, default interest (not to exceed the rate allowed by the Act) or such other charges as the Executive Board may fix by rule from time to time to defray extra expenses incurred in handling a delinquent Assessment installment. Further, the Association may bring an action at law or in equity, or both, against any Owner personally obligated to pay such overdue assessments, charges or fees, or monthly or other installments thereof, and may also proceed to foreclose its lien against t i B&kS.Yis. Sp g. Ranch e..>., a.* * ' Zoci-abort iu P00 17 • PRELIMINARY DRAFT: SUBJECT TO REVISION such Owner's Lot. An action at law or in equity by the Association against a Owner to recover a money judgment for unpaid assessments, charges or fees, or monthly or other installments thereof, may be commenced and pursued by the Association without foreclosing, or in any way waiving, the Association's lien. 7.9 Open Space and Wildlife Conservation Fund. Included in the annual Assessments to be made, an Open Space and Wildlife Conservation fee shall be assessed. The initial fee shall be $5.00 per month per Lot at the time of the recordation of this Declaration. Such fee shall be subject to increase on annual basis based on the increase in the consumer price index. The Open Space and Wildlife Conservation Fund shall be deposited in a separate interest-bearing account and administered by the Executive Board. The Open Space and Wildlife Conservation Fund shall be used solely for the preservation and enhancement of wildlife habitat on the Property and in the general vicinity of the Property which could include planting native vegetation species around ponds, improving wildlife migration corridors and enhancing open space areas for wildlife on the Property or in the Spring Valley area in consultation with the Colorado Division of Wildlife and other available consultants. 7.10 Working Fund. The Association or Declarant shall require the first Owner of each Lot (other than Declarant) to make a nonrefundable payment to the Association in an amount equal to $100.00, which sum shall be held, without interest, by the Association as a "working fund." The working fund shall be collected and transferred to the Association at the time of closing of each sale by Declarant of each Lot. The working fund may be used from time to time by the Executive Board for any Association purpose and thereafter replenished by inclusion in the next annual Assessment. Such payment shall not be considered an advance payment of annual Assessments and shall not relieve a Owner from making regular payments of the Assessments when due. At the time of reconveyance of a Lot, the transferring Owner shall be entitled to a credit from the acquiring Owner for this payment. 8 PROPERTY USE RESTRICTIONS 8.1 General Restriction. Except for the Agricultural Reserve, the Planned Community shall be used only for the private residential dwelling purposes in conformance with this Declaration and subject to the applicable rules and regulations of all governmental authorities having jurisdiction. The Agricultural Reserve may be used for any agricultural activity allowed under applicable governmental laws, rules and regulations. ,1'HnkneYLa.. 3pwg. Rem, la PUD • v2 ,p1 18 • • PRELIMINARY DRAFT: SUBJECT TO REVISION 8.2 Limited Business Activities. Subject to all applicable governmental regulations, and in addition to residential purposes. in-home business activities or occupations not involving the provision of on site services for customers or use of employees on site (other than Owners) shall be allowed, provided such activities: (i) are conducted solely within the Lot, (ii) do not materially increase motor vehicle traffic on the Property, (iii) do not create any external indication of an in-home business, and (iv) do not generate any noise, smoke, dust, odors, heat or other offensive or noxious emanations on the Property. Notwithstanding the foregoing, business activities associated with the sale of Lots shall be allowed. 8.3 Construction and Alteration of Improvements. No Improvements in the Planned Community shall be erected, placed, reconstructed, replaced, repaired or otherwise altered, nor shall any construction, repair or reconstruction be commenced until plans for such Improvement shall have been approved by the Association as provided in this Declaration except that Improvements which are completely within a structure may be undertaken without such approval. 8.4 Compliance With Laws. Subject to the rights of reasonable contest, each Owner shall promptly comply with the provisions of all applicable laws, regulations and ordinances with respect to the Property including, without limitation, all applicable environmental laws and regulations. 8.5 Nuisance. No obnoxious or offensive activity shall be carried on with in the Property, nor shall anything be done or permitted which shall constitute a public nuisance. 8.6 No Hazardous or Unsafe Activities. No activity shall be conducted on the Property, and no Improvement shall be constructed on any Lot which is or may be unsafe or hazardous to any Person or property. 8.7 Prohibition of Increases in Insurable Risks. Nothing shall be done or kept on the Property or on any Lot which would result in the cancellation or reduction of insurance on all or any part of the Property or in an increase in the cost of such insurance, but for such activity, without the prior written approval of the Association. 8.8 Prohibition against Damage or Waste. No damage to or waste of the Property including any portion of the Common Elements shall be committed by any Owner or Occupant. Each Owner hereby agrees to indemnify and hold the Association and the other Owners harmless against any damage or waste caused by such Owner and agrees to pay for or reimburse the Association for any and all costs and i'1'8 S.NLae Ss.gI Ranch Owns Asmaoo,\Decla ., - .ca 19 *0 • • PRELIMINARY DRAFT: SUBJECT TO REVISION expenses resulting from any damage or waste caused by a Owner or the Owner's Occupants or pets. 8.9 Obstructions. No person shall obstruct or interfere with the free use of walkways, driveways, drainage structures or other Common Elements, except as may be reasonably required for repairs. The Association shall take such action as may be necessary to abate or enjoin any interference with or obstruction of walkways, paths and drainage courses. 8.10 Vehicles. Not more than ( ) motor vehicles may be kept on each Lot. Each vehicle shall be registered with the Association by type, year, color, license number and such other identification as is appropriate. No trucks, trail bikes, recreational vehicles, motor homes, motor coaches, snowmobiles, campers, trailers, boats or boat trailers, or similar vehicles (other than passenger automobiles or pickup or utility trucks with a capacity of one ton or less) or any other vehicles shall be parked, stored, or in any manner kept or placed on any portion of the Property which vehicles are visible from a street or any other Lot except for vehicles which are kept in an enclosed garage or screened enclosure. This restriction, however, shall not be deemed to prohibit occasional parking of vehicles on driveways or commercial and construction vehicles, in the ordinary course of business, from making deliveries or otherwise providing service to the Property or for approved construction by Declarant or Owners. No trail bikes, four wheelers, snowmobiles, other similar recreational vehicles, automobiles, pickups, utility trucks or any other vehicles shall be operated on any portion of the Property except for travel to and from a Lot to another location in a nonrepetitive fashion. 8.11 Obstructions. There shall be no obstruction or interference with the free use of any roadway, the common water system or any easement, except as may be reasonably required for repairs. The Association shall promptly take such action as may be necessary to abate or enjoin any interference with or obstruction of any easement. The Association shall have a right of entry on any part of the Property for the purposes of enforcing this Section. Any costs incurred by the Association in connection with such enforcement shall be assessed to the persons responsible for the interference. 8.12 No Firearms or Hunting. Except for animal control measures, the discharge of firearms on any part of the Planned Community is expressly prohibited. Hunting on any part of the Planned Community (including Lots) is expressly prohibited. 20 PRELIMINARY DRAFT: SUBJECT TO REVISION 8.13 Service Facilities. All clothes lines, storage tanks, equipment, service yards and similar service facilities shall be screened by adequate plantings or fencing so as to conceal same from other Lots and streets and roads. 8.14 Maintenance of Landscaping. Each Owner shall keep the landscaping situate on such Owner's Lot in a neat and well maintained fashion, shall properly irrigate the lawns and other planting on such Lot and shall otherwise maintain the appearance of such Lot in a first class condition. 8.15 Natural Vegetation Preservation. All Improvements within the Planned Community shall be located, designed, and constructed so as to preserve and protect trees and natural shrubs. In order to conserve the natural beauty of the area, no existing trees or natural shrubs (e.g., cedar, pinon or gamble oak) may be removed or trimmed except with the prior written approval of the Development Review Committee. This restriction shall not apply to essential clearing of a Lot in connection with the construction of a residence (but not other Improvements) within the Building Envelope within a Lot, provided the prior written approval of the Development Review Committee has been obtained. Any violation of this Section shall subject the offending Owner to such penalties, fines and/or other conditions as the Development Review Committee considers appropriate, including without limitation the withdrawal or modification of previously granted development approvals, or the requirement that replacement trees or shrubs of equivalent or different size and type be planted and maintained by the Owner. 8.16 Animals and Pets. No animal, livestock or poultry of any kind shall be kept, raised or bred on any Lot, except that not more than (2) dogs and two (2) cats, and other typical small household pets, such as birds and fish, shall be allowed. The Association shall be empowered to adopt animal control rules and regulations. Nothing contained in this Declaration or in any adopted rules and regulations shall limit the power of the Association with respect to animal control including the right to determine that a particular animal is a nuisance and the right to require its removal from the Planned Community. The following special requirements shall apply to any dogs permitted on any Lot: 8.16.1 Each dog shall be kept under the control of the Owner and on a leash at all times when outside a fenced area or structure and shall not be permitted to run free or to cause a nuisance on the Property. 8.16.2 No dog shall be allowed to bark excessively, which is defined as barking more or less continuously during any fifteen (15) minute period not including any momentary cessations. I Ba.x.'1!e Spn 94 Rare Curs A!, w' Declaoo, ,.0 • .2 ..oc 21 00 PRELIMINARY DRAFT: SUBJECT TO REVISION 8.16.3 Each dog shall be leashed, kept in a humane kennel or run at all times or adequately restrained by an electronic barrier device. Metal chain link fencing will be allowed for the purposes of kenneling a dog. The location and style of each kennel shall be subject to review by the Development Review Committee. A kennel shall be installed prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for any Lot if the Owner possesses a dog at such time and, in any event, prior to the introduction of a dog on any Lot. 8.16.4 All Owners shall keep dogs reasonably clean and free of disease and each Lot shall be kept free of animal waste. 8.16.5 Should any dog chase or molest deer, elk, poultry or any domestic animals or persons, or destroy or disturb property of another, the Association may prohibit the Owner from continuing to keep the offending dog on such Owner's Lot. If necessary, to protect wildlife or other Owners' domestic animals, persons or property, the Association may take additional steps, including the destruction of the offending dog. Except in an emergency or as provided by law, the owner of an offending dog shall be provided written notice of such action at least five (5) days before disposal occurs. Such notice shall be posted on the front door of the residence of the Owner of the offending dog. Within such five (5) day period, the offending dog may be kenneled at a licensed kennel with all costs incurred by the Association assessed against the Owner. 8.16.6 The Association shall assess and enforce penalties against Owners violating the restrictions applying to dogs as follows: One Hundred Dollars ($100,00) for the first violation. The fine shall be increased by One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) for each succeeding violation. In addition, the Association may impose fees for dog registration or other dog control services, impose regulations regarding the keeping of dogs on any Lot, and levy fines against Owners who violate this covenant or any of the regulations promulgated hereunder or subsequently by the Association. The schedule of fees and fines established shall be sufficient to recover all of the costs of this animal control program on an annualized basis. 8.17 Signs. No signs of any kind shall be displayed to the public view on or from any portion of the Property except those signs approved by the Executive Board, ordinary real estate signs, business signs of Declarant or its affiliates, or signs required by law. 18aka 1t S Spnngs Ranch Ovmes Ass¢.sv ,:sc]s won la ol;O..2 wyd 22 114 • • PRELIMINARY DRAFT: SUBJECT TO REVISION 8.18 Solid Waste. No trash, ashes, garbage, rubbish, debris or other refuse shall be thrown, dumped or otherwise accumulated on the Property. There shall be no burning of refuse. Each Owner shall use the central receptacles for the temporary storage and collection of solid waste, which shall be screened from public view and protected from wind, animals and other disturbances. Each Lot shall be kept in a sanitary condition, free of offensive odors, rodent and insect infestations at the Owner's sole cost. 8.19 Outside Burning. There shall be no exterior fires, except for barbecues, outside fireplaces and braziers. No Owner shall allow any condition upon such Owner's Lot which creates a fire hazard or violates fire prevention regulations. 8.20 Dust Control. The Association shall be control dust on the private roads in the Planned Community. Owners shall be responsible for ongoing dust control of their private driveways. All roads and driveways within the Planned Community shall be monitored by the Association to achieve minimal dust pollution. Roads and driveways shall be treated as necessary with magnesium chloride or other dust suppressants approved by the Garfield County Environmental Health Department. The Association shall have the right to treat private driveways and charge the responsible Owner, if the Owner fails to fulfill Owner's responsibility for individual dust control. 8.21 Noise. No exterior horns, whistles, bells or other sound devices, except security devices approved in writing by the Executive Board, shall be placed cr used on any portion of the Property. Owners shall not allow any noise or disturbance on their respective Lots which is offensive, disturbing or otherwise detrimental to any other person. 8.22 Odor. No odor shall be emitted from any Lot which is noxious or unreasonably offensive to others. 8.23 Lighting. All exterior lighting installed or maintained on any Lot shall be placed so that the light source is screened or shielded from the residence on any other Lot. No light shall be emitted from any Lot which is unreasonably bright or causes unreasonable glare. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, no spotlights, floodlights or other high-intensity lights shall be permitted within the Planned Community without the prior written approval of the Development Review Committee. The Development Guidelines may contain standards for exterior lighting including, without limitation, standards for hue and intensity. 1 a>renr.1.8 Sprvge rich Q.nrs A,so ae Jeclldar .Jo • .2 wp: 23 • s PRELIMINARY DRAFT: SUBJECT TO REVISION 8.24 Wells. No well from which water, oil, or gas is produced shall be dug, nor shall storage tanks, reservoirs, or any installation of power, telephone, or other utility lines (wires, pipe, or conduit) be made or operated anywhere on the Property except in connection with water wells and works installed by Declarant or the Association. 8.25 Minerals. No portion of the Property shall be used for the exploration, extraction or storage of oil, gas, minerals, sand, gravel, rock, earth or other materials. 8.26 Excavation or Fill. No excavation or fill shall be made except in connection with Improvements approved as provided in this Declaration. For purposes of this Section, "excavation" shall mean any disturbance of the surface of the land (except to the extent reasonably necessary for approved landscape planting) which results in a removal of earth, rock or other substance a depth of more than 18 inches below the natural surface of the land. For the purposes of this Section, "fill" shall mean any importation and placement of earth, rock or other substance a height of more than eighteen inches (18") above the natural surface of the land. 8.27 Drainage and Erosion Control. No Owner shall do or permit any work, construct any Improvements, place any landscaping or suffer the existence of any condition whatsoever which shall alter or interfere with the drainage pattern for the Property, or cause any discharge onto any adjacent property, except to the extent such alteration and drainage pattern is approved in writing by the Association and any other affected Owner. The surface of the Property, including all Lots, shall be maintained in a condition which will minimize the risk of soil erosion. 8.28 Vegetation and Noxious Weed Control and Management. The Association and each Owner shall implement and follow a long term program for noxious weed control any plant species included on the Garfield County Noxious Weed List as the same may be revised from time to time. Assistance in the development and implementation of a weed management program will by sought through the Colorado State University Cooperative Extension Service and from the Garfield County Office of Vegetation Management. Initially the Association shall implement and follow the Vegetation Management Plan on file in the Garfield County Planning Department with the Subdivision Application for the Planned Community. The weed control and vegetation management plan shall include the following components: 8.28.1 Prevention and Control. The quick revegetation of disturbed areas with weed free grass seed and the maintenance of native or introduced vegetation in a healthy, vigorous condition producing optimum vegetative densities leaving noxious weeds little opportunity to establish. t'Hrksa,�Lake Spnga Ra�cf, 0.... Aaaouaum\Da IM lan la PUO - v2 roe 24 foe • • PRELIMINARY DRAFT: SUBJECT TO REVISION 8.28.2 Inventory. Each Lot shall be inspected to identify any infestations of noxious weeds. An accurate record shall be kept of the application and success of weed infestation eradication efforts. 8.28.3 Eradication. Elimination of noxious weeds by: 8.28.3.1 Mechanical Controls to physically remove the entire weed plant or eliminate the plant's ability to produce seed; 8.28.3.2 Biological Controls relying on organisms (insects or plant pathogens) to interfere with weed growth; and 8.28.3.3 Chemical Controls using herbicides to eliminate weeds with special care used to avoid damage to desirable plant species and to avoid contamination of ground water. 8.28.4 Owner Responsibility. Each Owner shall implement a weed management program within the Owner's Lot and adhere to the Colorado Noxious Weed Act. C.R.S. 35-5-102 and the Garfield County Weed Management Plan to manage any noxious weeds in the event a property owner fails to effectively control noxious weeds on their Lot, the Association shall have the right to enter upon any Lot and conduct a weed control program within the area of such Lot. 8.29 Wildlife Protection Restrictions. In order to preserve, protect and promote the well being of existing wildlife as well as enhance wildlife habitat on the Property: 8.29.1 No tree or vegetation removal shall be permitted within the Common Elements except as may be necessary, in the determination of the Association, to remove a dangerous condition or to control an invasive species. 8.29.2 The pet and animal restrictions set forth above shall be rigorously enforced. 8.29.3 No Owner or Occupant shall accumulate or store trash or garbage on a Lot outside of a residential structure unless such trash or garbage is contained within a container certified as bear -proof by the North American Bear Society, the National Park Service or Colorado Division of Wildlife; provided, however, that Owners may use trash or garbage containers which do not meet the certifications above described so long as: .,:8_.•r. t..• Soong. Reim Owns £s.ac s r..aus - 42 AO 25 1110 PRELIMINARY DRAFT: SUBJECT TO REVISION 8.29.3.1 8.29.3.2 The containers are placed outside no earlier than one (1) hour prior to the regularly scheduled time for trash collection by a waste disposal service provider; and The containers are returned to the interior of the residential structure no later than one (1) hour after trash collection by the waste disposal service provider. 8.29.4 No Owner or Occupant sha- bait, salt or utilize any other means or artifice to attract wildlife to a _• or the Property. This limitation shall not apply to bird feeders or bird houses which may be located and utilized within the Property. 8.29.5 The Association and Owners may restrict wildlife from landscaping and other isolated sensitive areas by using temporary fencing and other passive means which will not unreasonably restrict the general movement of wildlife within the Property. iho 8.29.6 • No Owner or Occupant may chase, scare, disturb, haze, worry or use any other form of harassment to drive or coerce big game (such as deer and elk) off of the Common Elements. 8.29.7 The Association and all Owners hereby waive, release and shall hold the Colorado Division of Wildlife harmless from, any and all claims for damages to landscaping improvements or ornamental plants located on the Lots or Common Elements resulting from the activities of big game such as deer and elk. 8.29.8 The Association and any affected Owner shall be responsible for the removal and proper disposal of all large animal carcasses found upon the Common Elements or Lots, as may be appropriate. 9 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 9.1 Development Guidelines. The Association shall apply the Development Guidelines when reviewing proposed Improvements on a Lot. The Development Guidelines shall not be inconsistent with this Declaration, but shall more specifically define and describe the Development standards for the Planned Community. The Development Guidelines may be modified or amended from time to time by the Association to establish reasonable criteria, including, without limitation, requirements relating to design, scale and color, as the Association may deem -BeM1.ete A eke 5pnn9s Ranch Owners Assooaom:.+ci.auon b PUD • v2 w➢e 26 PRELIMINARY DRAFT: SUBJECT TO REVISION appropriate in the interest of preserving the aesthetic standards of the Planned Community. Further, the Association, in its sole discretion, may excuse compliance with the Development Guidelines that are not necessary or appropriate in specific situations. Compliance with the Association's Development Review process shall not be a substitute for compliance with applicable governmental building, zoning and subdivision regulations. Each Owner shall be responsible for obtaining all approvals, licenses and permits as may be required before commencing construction. 9.2 Development Review Committee. The Association shall have a Development Review Committee, which shall consist of a minimum of three (3) members, each of whom shall either be (i) a representative of Declarant, (ii) an Owner or Occupant of a Lot in the Planned Community or (iii) a local architect, landscape architect or engineer. All members of the Development Review Committee shall be appointed and removed from time to time by the Executive Board in its discretion. A member may be removed by the Executive Board at any time upon written notice, without cause. Subject to the three (3) member minimum, the Executive Board may increase or decrease the size of the Development Review Committee from time to time in its discretion. The Executive Board may hire or appoint a secretary for the Development Review Committee, and shall provide appropriate compensation for any such secretarial services. 9.3 Meetings and Action of Development Review Committee. The Development Review Committee shall meet from time to time as necessary to perform its duties hereunder. A majority of the members of the Development Review Committee shall constitute a quorum of the Committee. Actions of the Committee shall be taken at a meeting at which a quorum is present in person or by proxy, by the vote of a majority of such members constituting the quorum, but in no event less than two (2) members. The Development Review Committee shall report in writing to the Executive Board all final actions of the Development Review Committee, and the Executive Board shall keep a permanent record of such reported actions. 9.4 Pre -submission Conference. Every Owner proposing to make Improvements to a Lot shall meet in a pre -submission conference with the Development Review Committee to discuss the general nature and scope of the contemplated Improvements, the Development Guidelines and the Committee's procedures prior to Owner's expenditure of significant design fees. The Development Review Committee shall give priority to the scheduling of such pre -submission conferences. The Owner's design professional should, if possible, attend the pre -submission conference. • 1 Be, KeaeVLSe Springs Parch O*... A saoaawnkOecie awn Ip PUO • v2 ,rod 27 PRELIMINARY DRAFT: SUBJECT TO REVISION 9.5 Development Review. The Development Review Committee shall review, study and either approve or reject proposed Improvements in the Planned Community, in compliance with this Declaration and the Development Guidelines. Each application for Development Review shall include such plans and specifications and other information as may reasonably be required by the Development Review Committee. In any Development Review, the Development Review Committee shall exercise its best judgment to see that all Improvements conform and harmonize with any existing structures as to external design, quality and type of construction, materials, color, location of Improvements, height, grade and finished ground elevation and all aesthetic considerations set forth in this Declaration and in the Development Guidelines. The Development Review Committee may avail itself of technical and professional advice as it deems appropriate. The Development Review Committee shall make reasonable Rules and Regulations as it may deem appropriate to govern in such proceedings. The Development Review Committee's exercise of discretion in approval or disapproval of plans or with respect to any other matter before it, shall be conclusive and binding on all parties. 9.6 Development Review Expenses. The Association shall have the right to recover the reasonable costs and expenses of any technical and professional advice required to properly consider the application from Applicant. 9.7 Decision of Committee. Any decision of the Development Review Committee shall be made within forty-five (45) days after receipt by the Development Review Committee of all materials and information required by the Development Review Committee, unless such time period is extended by mutual written agreement. The decision shall be in writing and if the decision is not to approve the proposed Improvements, the reasons therefor shall be stated. The decision of the Development Review Committee shall be promptly transmitted to the Owner at the address furnished by the Owner to the Development Review Committee. Any written request for approval of proposed Improvements shall be deemed approved, unless written disapproval or a request for additional information or materials is transmitted to the Owner by the Development Review Committee within sixty (60) days after the date of receipt by the Development Review Committee of all required materials and information, unless such time period is extended by mutual written agreement. 9.8 Prosecution and Completion of Work After Approval. Following an approval of any proposed Improvements by the Development Review Committee, the proposed Improvements shall be completed by the Owner: (a) in compliance with the Development Guidelines and with all applicable laws, regulations and codes, (b) in strict conformance with all plans and specifications and other materials presented 1 ` I'Beke*,Lse =✓rya Race, Twos A.*ocl* IO. laacn Ice •.2 wpd 28 PRELIMINARY DRAFT: SUBJECT TO REVISION to and approved by the Development Review Committee; and (c) in accordance with any and all conditions imposed by the Development Review Committee. All Improvements approved by the Development Review Committee shall be completed, including issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy and the removal of all construction equipment, materials and debris (i) within twenty-four (24) months from the date of approval of such Improvements by the Development Review Committee, provided, however, that any and all landscaping approved by the Development Review Committee which is related to the initial construction of a residence on a Lot shall be completed no later than six (6) months immediately following the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy for such residence. Any member or agent of the Development Review Committee or of the Executive Board, may, at any reasonable time enter, without being deemed guilty of trespass, upon any Lot, after reasonable notice to the Owner, in order to inspect Improvements constructed or being constructed on such Lot, to ascertain whether such Improvements have been or are being built or changed in compliance with the Development Guidelines, the approvals granted by the Development Review Committee, and this Declaration. Failure to comply with the terms and conditions of this Section shall constitute noncompliance with the terms and provisions of this Declaration and the Executive Board shall have the right to invoke all rights and remedies available, including but not limited to, the imposition of fines and penalties. 9.9 Limitation of Liability. The Association shall use reasonable judgment in accepting or rejecting plans and specifications submitted to it for Development Review. Neither the Association, Declarant, nor any officer, Executive Board member or individual Association member shall be liable to any person for any act of the Association concerning submitted plans and specifications, except for wanton and willful acts. Approval by the Association does not necessarily assure approval by any governmental authority having jurisdiction. Notwithstanding Association approval of plans and specification, neither the Association nor any of its members shall be responsible or liable to any Owner, developer or contractor with respect to any loss, liability, claim or expenses which may arise because of approval of the construction of the Improvements. Neither the Executive Board, the Association, nor Declarant, nor any of their employees, agents or consultants shall be responsible in any way for any defects in any plans or specifications submitted, revised or approved in accordance with the provisions of the Declaration, nor for any structural or other defects in any work done according to such plans and specifications. 10 CONSTRUCTION AND ALTERATION OF IMPROVEMENTS 1,1 Sao e.eSc .g. Ranch Owners Aaaxaamv Daclsalnn for PUO • v2 *PE 29 •• • • PRELIMINARY DRAFT: SUBJECT TO REVISION 10.1 General. The Development Guidelines and the provisions set forth in this Declaration shall govern the right of a Owner to construct, reconstruct, refinish, alter or maintain any Improvement upon, under or above any of the Property, and to make or create any excavation or fill on the Property, or make any change in the natural or existing surface contour or drainage, or install any utility line or conduit on or over the Property. 10.2 Approval Required. No Improvement in the Planned Community shall be erected, placed, reconstructed, replaced, repaired or otherwise altered, nor shall any construction, repair or reconstruction be commenced until plans for such Improvement shall have been approved by the Association; provided, however, that Improvements and alterations which are completely within a structure may be undertaken without such approval. 10.3 Underground Utility Lines. With respect to the new construction of any Improvements within the Planned Community or the extension of any utilities, all utility pipes or lines within the limits of the Planned Community shall be buried underground and not be carried on overhead poles or above the surface of the ground. Any natural vegetation disturbed by the installation of utility lines shall be revegetated within twelve (12) months of completion of any Improvement by and at the expense of the Owner causing the installation of such utilities. 10.4 Size Restrictions of Dwellings. The minimum living area of the dwelling on any Lot shall be 1,800 square feet, exclusive of all areas utilized for garages, decks and open porches. 10.5 Specific Requirements for Dwellings. The maximum building height shall be as determined and defined by the regulations of Garfield County. All construction materials shall be new, except for the limited use of antique treatments, fixtures and accessories. No building or structure originally constructed in whole or in part at another location, including, but not limited to UBC and HUD manufactured homes, shall be moved onto any Lot. Log homes which are to be erected on a log by log basis on a Lot which may have been originally fitted together at a place other than the Lot may be approved by the Association. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing or the right of the Development Review Committee to impose additional limitations and conditions, reflective materials shall not be permitted on the exterior of structures within the Planned Community without the prior written approval of the Development Review Committee. 10.6 Fireplaces and Stoves. No open hearth solid fuel fireplaces shall be allowed. There shall be no restrictions on the number of natural gas burning fireplaces or B.ih.byla. :.>^9. Rare+ ".n.r. A..o S,€,\D.ci. arm la P•_C..: ww 30 • PRELIMINARY DRAFT: SUBJECT TO REVISION appliances. Each dwelling unit will be allowed one (1) new wood -burning stove as defined by C.R.S. 25-7-401, et. seq., and the regulations promulgated thereunder. 10.7 Wildfire Prevention. The guidelines of the Colorado State Forester for wildfire prevention (presently contained in a pamphlet titled "Wildfire Protection in the Wildland Urban Interface" C.S.F.S. #143-691) and any subsequent guidelines promulgated shall be followed in the construction of all Improvements. 10.8 Fences and Hedges. The type and location of all fences and hedges will be subject to the approval of the Development Review Committee prior to installation. Only wooden fences shall be permitted within the Property, with limited exceptions for small gardens, kennels, play areas for small children or otherwise and only in circumstances where a wooden fence would not serve the required purpose. Barbed wire fencing shall be prohibited. The Development Review Committee shall consider the effect on wildlife activity prior to approving any requested fencing. Wood fencing shall not exceed forty-two (42) inches in height, shall not have more than two (2) horizontal poles with spacing of at least eighteen inches (18") between rails and with the bottom rail at least twenty-four inches (24") above the ground. Lot boundary perimeter fencing shall not be allowed. 10.9 Landscaping. No landscaping shall be performed on any Lot unless a landscaping plan therefor has received the prior written approval of the Development Review Committee. A landscaping plan for each Lot must be approved by the Development Review Committee before construction is commenced on the residence on that Lot. In each instance, an approved landscaping plan shall be fully implemented and performed within the six (6) month period immediately following (i) the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for a residence constructed on a Lot. or (ii) the approval of the landscaping plan by the Development Review Committee in all instances not involving the construction of a residence on a Lot. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no review or approval shall be required for the replacement or replanting of the same or similar kind of trees, or plants, or flowers, or other vegetation that has been previously approved by the Development Review Committee for the Lot in question, in the previously approved location therefor. Any material change in the type or location of approved landscaping vegetation shall require the further approval of the Development Review Committee. Landscaping shall be primarily indigenous plant life from a plant list to be established by the Development Review Committee. Irrigation of landscaped areas shall be subject to guidelines promulgated by the Development Review Committee. Each Owner shall diligently maintain, trim, weed, cultivate, husband, protect, preserve and otherwise keep in a healthy and attractive condition the shrubs, trees, hedges, grass, planters, gardens and other landscaping upon the Owner's Lot, including, without limitation, the removal of dead and •1eaxdmntak^ Spnpa R. =w, n.socsa „aclasan for PUD - vz.wpd 31 • • PRELIMINARY DRAFT: SUBJECT TO REVISION diseased branches and brush and the performance of other tasks necessary to remove or eliminate material which constitutes or creates a fire hazard or nuisance, and shall keep the Owner's Lot free of any prohibited plants. Each Owner shall cooperate with the Association in its fire protection husbandry program for reduction of fire hazard within the Planned Community. Each Owner shall also maintain all paved, concrete and other synthetically surfaced areas within the Owner's Lot, including but not limited to, driveway and parking areas, in good condition and repair. 10.10 Removal of Nonconforming Improvements. The Association, after reasonable notice to the offender and to the Owner, may remove any Improvement constructed, reconstructed, refinished, altered or maintained violating this Declaration, and the Owner of the Improvement shall immediately reimburse the Association for all expenses incurred in such removal. 11 MAINTENANCE 11.1 Owner's Maintenance Responsibility. Except as provided otherwise in this Declaration or by written agreement with the Association, all maintenance of individual Lots including, without limitation, all Improvements, utility systems, utility lines from the point of departure from shared usage and landscaping shall be the sole responsibility of the respective Owners. Each Lot shall be maintained in a good, clean, safe, attractive and sanitary condition and repair consistent with the requirements of a first class residential development. A Owner shall not allow any action or work that will impair the structural soundness of the Improvements or impair the proper functioning of utilities or other services. 11.2 Owner's Negligence. In the event that any portion of the Common Elements requires repair or replacement due to the negligent or willful act or omission of a Owner or Occupant, then the expenses incurred by the Association for such repair or replacement shall be a personal obligation of such Owner. If the Owner fails to pay the same within ten (10) days after notice is given to the Owner of the amount owed, then the failure to so repay shall be a default by the Owner and such expenses shall automatically become a default Assessment. 11.3 Association's Maintenance Responsibility. The Association shall maintain and keep all portions of the Common Elements in good, clean, attractive, safe and sanitary condition and repair consistent with the requirements of a first class residential development. • 12 INSURANCE I' 18a1d,4o. Spvq, Ranch O'.rs, A"cc .s r facia soon for PUD • v2 *,a 32 • • PRELIMINARY DRAFT: SUBJECT TO REVISION 12.1 Owner's Insurance Responsibility. Each Owner shall be responsible for all insurance coverage for the owner's Lot and all Improvements and betterments thereon. In addition, each Owner shall be responsible for insuring all personal property within the Lot, as well as general liability insurance and any other insurance coverage deemed appropriate by such Owner. Each Owner's policy shall contain waivers of subrogation and provide further that the liability of the carriers issuing insurance to the Association hereunder shall not be effected or diminished by reason of any such insurance carried by any Owner. 12.2 Association's Insurance Responsibility. The Association shall maintain all insurance coverage required by the provisions of C.R.S. 38-33.3-101, et. seq., as the same may be amended from time to time, together with such other insurance as the Executive Board of the Association shall deem advisable. 12.3 Coverage. Commencing not later than the first conveyance of a Lot to a purchaser and to the extent reasonably available, the Association shall obtain and maintain insurance coverage as set forth in this Article. If such insurance is not reasonably available, and the Executive Board determines that any insurance described herein will not be maintained, the Executive Board shall promptly cause notice of that fact to be hand delivered or sent prepaid by United States mail to all Owners and Eligible First Mortgagees at their respective last known addresses. 12.4 Required Provisions. All insurance policies carried pursuant to the requirements of this Article must provide that: (a) each Owner and each Eligible First Mortgagee is an insured person under the policy with respect to liability arising out of such Owner's interest in the Common Elements or membership in the Association; (b) the insurer waives its rights to subrogation under the policy against any Owner or member of his household; (c) no act or omission by any Owner or Eligible First Mortgagee, unless acting within the scope of such Owner's authority on behalf of the Association, will void the policy or be a condition to recovery under the policy; (d) if, at the time of a loss under the policy, there is other insurance in the name of a Owner covering the risks covered by the policy, the Association's policy provides primary insurance; (e) any loss covered by the policies must be adjusted with the Association; (f) the insurance process for any loss shall be payable to an insurance trustee designated for that purpose, or otherwise to the Association and not to any holder of a Security Interest; (g) the insurer shall issue certificates or memoranda of insurance to the Association and, upon request, to any Owner or holder of a Security Interest; and (h) the insurer issuing the policy may not cancel or refuse to renew it until thirty (30) days after notice of the proposed cancellation or non- renewal has been mailed to the Association and any Owner(s) and holder(s) of „9n”NeyLaMe Spmg. Rack Owner. +a.ppepm`.Dxlaelgn fa PUD . v2 wpe 33 • • • PRELIMINARY DRAFT: SUBJECT TO REVISION Security Interests to whom a certificate or memorandum of insurance has been issued at their respective last know addresses. 12.5 Adjustment of Claims. The Association may adopt and establish written nondiscriminatory policies and procedures relating to the submittal of claims, responsibility for deductibles and any other matters of claims adjustment. To the extent the Association settles a property insurance claim, it shall have the authority to assess negligent Owners causing such loss or benefitting from such repair or restoration all deductibles paid by the Association. In the event more than one Lot is damaged by a loss, the Association in its reasonable discretion may assess each Owner a prorata share of any deductible paid by the Association. 12.6 Copies of Policies. A copy of each insurance policy obtain by the Association shall be made available for inspection by any Owner at reasonable times. 13 RESERVATION OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS 13.1 Development and Withdrawal Rights. Declarant expressly reserves the right to create Lots and Common Elements (the "Additional Improvement"), to combine Lots, to subdivide Lots, to convert Lots into Common Elements, to convert Common Elements into Lots on all or any portion of the Property reserved for future development phases in this Declaration. Declarant may exercise any or all of the Development Rights so reserved at any time with respect to all or any of the Property marked subject to Development Rights on the Plat. No assurances are made with respect to the boundaries of any Lots that may be developed or the order in which the Lots may be developed. Exercise of a Development Right with respect to any one parcel does not require exercise of a Development Right on any other parcel of the Property subject to Development Rights. No assurances are made, however, that any further development will occur. Declarant expressly reserves the right to withdraw all or any portion of the Property from the Planned Community by recording a document evidencing such withdrawal in the records of the Garfield County Clerk and Recorder; provided, however, that no portion of the Property may be withdrawn after a Lot in that portion of the Property has been conveyed to a purchaser. Real estate withdrawn from the Planned Community shall be subject to whatever easements, if any, are reasonably necessary for access to or operation of the Planned Community. Declarant shall prepare and record in the records of the Garfield County Clerk and Recorder whatever documents are necessary to evidence such easements. 13.2 Construction Easement. Declarant expressly reserves the right to perform construction work and to store materials in secure areas on the Common Elements I 1 bar4ele1Lrte Springs Ranch p..as +.scarier lac. anon 'cc PUO - v2 wpd 34 • • • PRELIMINARY DRAFT: SUBJECT TO REVISION and the right of access thereto, until completion of all Improvements required for the Common Elements. Declarant has such an easement through the Common Elements as may be reasonably necessary for the purpose of discharging Declarant's obligations and exercising Declarant's reserved rights in this Declaration. Such easement includes the right to construct underground utility lines, pipes, wires, ducts, conduits and other facilities across the Property not designated as reserved for future development in this Declaration or on the Plat for the purpose of furnishing utility and other services to Improvements to be constructed on any of the Property reserved for future development. Declarant's reserved construction easement includes the right to grant easements to public utility companies and to convey improvements within those easements anywhere in the Common Elements not occupied by an Improvement on a Lot. 13.3 Reciprocal Easements. If property is withdrawn from the Planned Community ("Withdrawn Property"): (a) the owners of the Withdrawn Property shall have whatever easements are necessary or desirable, if any, for access, utility service, repair, maintenance and emergencies over and across the Planned Community and (b) the Owners in the Planned Community shall have whatever easements are necessary or desirable, if any, for access, utility service, repair, maintenance and emergencies over and across the Withdrawn Property. Declarant shall prepare and record in the records of the Garfield County Clerk and Recorder whatever documents are necessary to evidence such easements. Such recorded easements shall specify that the owners of the Withdrawn Property and the Owners in the Planned Community shall be obligated to pay a proportionate share of the cost of the operation and maintenance of any easements utilized by either one of them on the other's property upon such reasonable basis as Declarant shall establish in the easements. 13.4 Termination of Development Rights. The Development Rights reserved to Declarant shall expire thirty (30) years after the date of recording this Declaration in the records of the Garfield County Clerk and Recorder, unless the Development Rights are reinstated or extended by the Association, subject to whatever terms, conditions and limitations the Executive Board may impose on the subsequent exercise of the Development Rights by Declarant. Declarant may at any time release and relinquish some or all of the Development Rights with respect to all or any part of the Property subject to such rights by instrument executed by Declarant and effective when recorded in the records of the Garfield County Clerk and Recorder. Upon the expiration or other termination of the Development Rights, any Property then subject to such rights shall become Common Elements or Lots, as applicable. 1 l l B.fldryLse Rs, h %«nss ASSCCI.On i:<a slam a _ _ - .2 mol 35 • s • PRELIMINARY DRAFT: SUBJECT TO REVISION 13.5 Interference with Development Rights. Neither the Association nor any Owner may take any action or adopt any rule or regulations that will interfere with or diminish any Development Rights reserved by this Article without the prior written consent of Declarant. 13.6 Transfer of Development Rights. Any Development Rights created or reserved under this Article for the benefit of Declarant may be transferred to any person by an instrument describing the rights transferred and recorded in the records of the Garfield County Clerk and Recorder. Such instrument shall be executed by the transferor Declarant and the transferee. 14 SPECIAL DECLARANT RIGHTS 14.1 Special Declarant Rights. Declarant hereby reserves the right, from time to time, to perform the acts and exercise the rights hereinafter specified (the "Special Declarant Rights"). Declarant's Special Declarant Rights include the following: 14.1.1 Use of Property During Construction. It shall be expressly permissible and proper for Declarant and any person acting with the prior written consent of Declarant, and their respective employees, agents, independent contractors, successors, and assigns involved in the construction of all Improvements required for the Common Elements and all Lots or the providing of utility service to the Property, to perform such activities and to maintain upon portions of the Property as they deem necessary, such facilities as may be reasonably required, convenient, necessary or incidental to such construction and development of the Property. This permission specifically includes, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, maintaining business offices, storage areas, construction yards and equipment, signs and sales offices. However, no activity shall be performed and no facility shall be maintained on any portion of the Property in such a way as to unreasonable interfere with the use of any Lot. 14.1.2 Exercise of Development Rights. The right to exercise any Development Right reserved in this Declaration. 14.1.3 Sales, Management and Marketing. The right to locate, relocate and maintain sales offices, management offices, signs advertising the Planned Community, and models within any Lot or Lots and in the Common Elements. Declarant shall have the right to show Lots and the Common Elements to prospective purchasers. I 0Be...yLak, Sp.mq, Ranch Owner, A„w.0m O.c S. 'm Pu0 . ,: APC 36 • • PRELIMINARY DRAFT: SUBJECT TO REVISION 14.1.4 Construction Easements. The right to use easements through the Common Elements for the purpose of making Improvements within the Planned Community. 14.1.5 Control of Association and Executive Board. The right to appoint or remove any officer of the Association or any member of the Executive Board. 14.1.6 Amendment of Declaration. The right to amend this Declaration in connection with the exercise of any Development Rights. 14.1.7 Amendment of Plat. The right to amend the Plat in connection with the exercise of any Development Rights. 14.1.8 Signs. The right to maintain signs on the Common Elements advertising the Planned Community. 14.1.9 Post -Sales. The right to use the Common Elements to maintain customer relations and provide post -sale services to Owners. 14.2 Additional Reserved Rights. In addition to the Special Declarant Rights set forth above, Declarant also reserves the following additional rights (the "Additional Reserved Rights"): 14.2.1 Dedications. The right to establish, from time to time, by dedication or otherwise, utility and other easements for purposes including but not limited to streets, paths, walkways, drainage, parking areas, driveways and to create other reservations, exception and exclusions for the benefit of and to serve the Owners within the Planned Community. 14.2.2 Easement Rights. The rights to an easement through the Common Elements as may be reasonably necessary for the purpose of discharging Declarant's obligations arising under this Declaration or the Act. 14.2.3 Other Rights. The right to exercise any Additional Reserved Right created by any other provision of this Declaration or of the Act. 14.3 Limitations on Special Declarant Rights and Additional Reserved Rights. Unless sooner terminated by an amendment to this Declaration executed by Declarant, any Special Declarant Right or Additional Reserved Rights may be exercised by Declarant so long as Declarant (a) is obligated under any warranty or obligation; (b) holds a Development Right; (c) owns any Lot; or (d) holds a Security .1 S.. 6,61. a Svegs Rw•cn Owners AesoneoanlCeclasm' ",iD • .2 veva 37 • • • PRELIMINARY DRAFT: SUBJECT TO REVISION Interest in any Lot; provided, however, all Special Declarant Rights and Additional Reserved Rights shall terminate thirty (30) years after the date of recording this Declaration. Earlier termination of certain rights may occur pursuant to requirements of the Act. 14.4 Interference with Special Declarant Rights. Neither the Association nor any Owners may take any action or adopt any rule and/or regulation that will interfere with or diminish any Special Declarant Rights or Additional Reserved Rights without the prior written consent of Declarant. 14.5 Rights Transferable. Any Special Declarant Rights or Additional Reserved Right created or reserved under this Article for the benefit of Declarant may be transferred to any person by an instrument describing the rights transferred and recorded in the records of the Garfield County Clerk and Recorder. Such instrument shall be executed by the transferor Declarant and the transferee. 15 MORTGAGEE PROTECTIONS 15.1 Introduction. This Article establishes certain standards and covenants .which are for the benefit of First Mortgagees. This Article is supplemental to, and not in substitution for, any other provisions of this Declaration, but in the case of any conflict, this Article shall control. 15.2 Percentage of First Mortgagees. Unless specifically provided otherwise. wherever in this Declaration the approval or consent of a specified percentage of Eligible First Mortgagees is required, it shall mean the approval or consent of sixty-seven percent (67%) of Eligible First Mortgagees. Each Eligible First Mortgagee shall be entitled to one vote for each Security Interest held by such Eligible First Mortgagee. 15.3 Notice of Actions. If requested in writing to do so, the Association shall give prompt written notice of the following to each Eligible First Mortgagee making such request: (a) any condemnation loss or any casualty loss which affects a material portion of the Common Elements or any Lot in which an interest is held by the Eligible First Mortgagee; (b) any delinquency in the payment of Assessments which remains uncured for sixty (60) days by a Owner whose Lot is encumbered by a Security Interest held by such Eligible First Mortgagee; (c) any lapse, cancellation or material modification of any insurance policy or fidelity bond maintained by the Association; (d) any proposed action which would require the consent of Eligible First Mortgagees as set forth in this Article; (e) any judgment rendered against the Association; and (f) a copy of any financial statement of the Association. 1 8.zee, Ate Sp. g. aexn own.. n..ec:w- . Ia . •o ..o • .2 *pc 38 • • • PRELIMINARY DRAFT: SUBJECT TO REVISION 15.4 Consent Required. The Association may not take any of the following actions, except as such rights have been specifically reserved by Declarant under the provisions of this Declaration, without the consent of sixty-seven percent (67%) of the Eligible First Mortgagees: (a) sale, conveyance or encumbrance of the Common Elements (provided, however, that the granting of easements for public utilities, for construction and maintenance of roads within the Planned Community, or for other purposes provided for in this Declaration will not be deemed a transfer within the meaning of this clause); (b) restoration or repair of the Planned Community (after hazard damage or partial condemnation) in a manner other than that specified in this Declaration; termination of this Declaration for reasons other than substantial destruction or condemnation, subject to the approval percentages required for such termination; (d) merger of the Planned Community with any other common interest community; or (e) any action not to repair or to replace the Common Elements except as permitted in this Declaration. 15.5 Notice of Objection. Unless an Eligible First Mortgagee provides the Secretary of the Association with written notice of its objection, if any, to any proposed amendment or action requiring the approval of Eligible First Mortgagees within thirty (30) days following the receipt of notice of such proposed amendment or action, the Eligible First Mortgagee will be deemed conclusively to have consented to or approved the proposed amendment or action. 15.6 First Mortgagees' Rights. 15.6.1 Advances. First Mortgagees, jointly or singly, may pay taxes or other charges which are in default and which may or have become a charge against any of the Common Elements or improvements thereon, and may pay overdue premiums on hazard insurance policies, or secure new hazard insurance coverage on the lapse of a policy, for the Common Elements. First Mortgagees making such payments shall be owed immediate reimbursement from the Association. 15.6.2 Cure Rights. First Mortgagees shall be entitled to cure any delinquency of the Owner encumbered by a First Mortgage in the payment of Assessments. In that event, the First Mortgagee shall be entitled to obtain a release from the lien imposed or perfected by reason of such delinquency. 15.7 Limitations on First Mortgagee's Rights. No requirement for approval or consent by a First Mortgagee provided in this Article shall operate to: (a) deny or delegate control over the general administrative affairs of the Association by the Owners or the Executive Board; (b) prevent the Association or Executive Board from 39 • • PRELIMINARY DRAFT: SUBJECT TO REVISION commencing, intervening and/or settling any legal proceeding; or (c) prevent any insurance trustee or the Association from receiving and distributing any insurance proceeds. 15.8 Special Declarant Rights. No provision or requirement of this Article entitled "Mortgagee Protections" shall apply to any Special Declarant Rights reserved to Declarant in this Declaration. 16 ENFORCEMENT OF DECLARATION 16.1 Violation Deemed a Nuisance. Every violation of this Declaration is declared and deemed to be a nuisance. All public and private remedies allowed at law or equity against anyone in violation of this Declaration shall be available. 16.2 Compliance. Each Owner and Occupant shall comply with the provisions of this Declaration as the same may be amended from time to time. Failure to comply with this Declaration shall be grounds for an action to recover damages or for injunctive relief to cause any such violation to be remedied, or both. Each Owner shall be responsible for the conduct of the Owner's family, tenants, employees, guests, contractors, agents, licensees and invitees whether or not the Owner is present. Each Owner shall inform all such persons of this Declaration. Any violation of this Declaration by any such person shall be deemed a violation by the Owner. 16.3 Who May Enforce. Any action to enforce this Declaration may be brought by Declarant or the Executive Board in the name of the Association on behalf of the Owners. If, after a written request from an aggrieved Owner, neither of the foregoing entities commence an action to enforce this Declaration, then the aggrieved Owner may bring such an action. 16.4 Enforcement. Enforcement of the covenants, conditions, restrictions, easements, reservations, rights-of-way and other provisions contained in this Declaration shall be through any proceedings at law or in equity brought by any aggrieved Owner, the Association or Declarant against the Association or any Owner. Such actions may seek remedy by injunction or restraint of a violation or attempted violation, or an action for damages, or any of them, without the necessity of making an election. Thus all the remedies set forth herein are cumulative and not exclusive. 16.5 Nonliability. No member of the Executive Board, Declarant or any Owner shall be liable to any other Owner for the failure to enforce this Declaration at any time. 111\BrxerOLae Songs Ranch Owners AssousomlDeclrm,!a FUD • .2 MD 40 • • • PRELIMINARY DRAFT: SUBJECT TO REVISION 16.6 Recovery of Costs. If legal assistance is obtained to enforce any provision of this Declaration, or in any legal proceeding (whether or not suit is brought) for damages or for the enforcement of this Declaration or the restraint of violations of this Declaration, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover all costs incurred, including reasonable attorney's fees. 17 MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 17.1 Severability. The provisions of this Declaration shall be deemed to be independent and severable, and the invalidity of any one or more of the provisions of it by judgment or court order or decree shall in no way affect the validity or enforceability of any of the other provisions, which provisions shall remain in full force and effect. Any provision which would violate the rule against perpetuities and the rule prohibiting unlawful restraints on alienation shall be construed in a manner as to make this Declaration valid and enforceable. 17.2 Construction. In interpreting words in this Declaration, unless the context shall otherwise provide or require, the singular shall include the plural, the plural shall include the singular, and the use of any gender shall include all genders. 17.3 Third Party Beneficiary. This Declaration is submitted, imposed, and declared solely for the benefit of Declarant, Owners, First Mortgagees and their respective successors, assigns, heirs, executors, administrators and personal representatives. No party shall be deemed a third party beneficiary of this Declaration. 17.4 Condemnation. If all or part of the Common Elements is taken by any power having the authority of eminent domain, all compensation and damages for and on account of the taking shall be payable in accordance with the provisions on eminent domain in the Act. 17.5 Headings. The headings and captions used in this Declaration are included only as a matter of convenience and reference and shall not affect the meaning or interpretation of any provision of this Declaration. 17.6 Conflicts in Legal Documents. In case of conflicts between the provisions in this Declaration and the Articles of Incorporation or the Bylaws, this Declaration shall control. In case of conflicts in the provisions in the Articles of Incorporation and the Bylaws, the Articles of Incorporation shall control. In case of conflicts between the provisions in this Declaration and any Plat of the Property , including the plat notes thereon, the provisions of said plat or plat notes shall govern and control and this 1lflO.rkd.y&a. Sp,q. Renc,,megs A..aus lDecisaum Iv PUo..3 ..pd 41 • • • PRELIMINARY DRAFT: SUBJECT TO REVISION Declaration shall automatically be amended, but only to the extent necessary to conform the conflicting provisions. 17.7 No Public Use Dedication. Except for roadways conveyed to Garfield County for public use by separate instrument, and except as otherwise expressly provided herein to the contrary, nothing contained in this Declaration shall be deemed to be or constitute a dedication of any part of the Property to the public or for any public use. 17.8 Notices. All notices or requests required shall be in writing. Notice to any Owner shall be considered delivered and effective upon personal delivery, or three (3) days after posting when sent by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the address of the Owner on file in the records of the Association at the time of the mailing or if no such address is available, then to the address shown by the County Assessor. Notice to the Executive Board or the Association shall be considered delivered and effective upon personal delivery, or three (3) days after posting when sent by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the Association, at the address as shall be established by the Association from time to time by notice to the Owners. General notices to all Owners need not be certified, but may be sent by regular first class mail. 17.9 Waiver or Delay in Enforcement. No failure by the Association or the Executive Board to give notice of default or any delay in enforcement of any provision or in the exercise of any right or remedy shall operate as a waiver. No waiver shall be effective unless it is in writing signed by the Chairman of the Executive Board on behalf of the Executive Board. 17.10 Choice of Law and Jurisdiction. This Declaration shall be construed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of Colorado, and specifically, the provisions of the Act and not the general common law (including remedies) of tenancy -in -common. Any legal action brought in connection with this Declaration shall be commenced in the courts of Garfield County, Colorado, and by acceptance of a deed to a Lot, the Owner voluntarily submits to the jurisdiction of such courts. 18 DURATION OF COVENANTS AMENDMENT AND TERMINATION 18.1 Term. This Declaration shall remain in effect from the date of its recordation for a period of fifty (50) years. Thereafter, this Declaration shall be automatically extended for successive periods of ten (10) years each, unless otherwise terminated or modified as provided in this Article. 1 \1 Bcekeb/L.ae Spiny. Rawl, lances Aesaclaim,Dedaa , la PUO • v2 *pd 42 • • • PRELIMINARY DRAFT: SUBJECT TO REVISION 18.2 Amendment of Declaration. This Declaration may be amended as follows: 18.2.1 Reserved Amendment Rights. To the extent that this Declaration and the Act expressly permit or require amendments that may be executed by Declarant or by the Association, this Declaration may be amended by amendments executed solely by Declarant or solely by the Association. To the extent permitted by the Act, Declarant may execute any amendment to the Declaration required or necessary to comply with the requirements, standards, or guidelines of recognized secondary mortgage markets, the Department of Housing and Urban Development, the Federal Housing Administration, the Veterans Administration, the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, the Government National Mortgage Association, or the Federal National Mortgage Association secondary mortgage market and Colorado state regulatory requirements. Declarant may also amend the Declaration or a Plat to correct clerical, typographical, or technical errors. 18.2.2 General Amendments. Subject to any provisions of this Declaration requiring the consent of Declarant, this Declaration, any Plat and any Supplement Plats may be amended only by the vote or agreement of Owners to which more than fifty percent (50%) of the votes in the Association are allocated. 18.2.3 Special Amendments. Except to the extent expressly permitted or required by other provisions of the Act (e.g., permitted Declarant or Association amendments), the unanimous consent of Owners is required for any amendment that (i) creates or increases Special Declarant Rights, (ii) increases the number of Lots, or (iii) changes the boundaries of any Lot, the Allocated Interests of a Lot or the uses to which any Lot is restricted. 18.3 Execution of Amendments: Expenses. Any amendment shall be prepared, executed and recorded either by Declarant or by an officer of the Association designated for that purpose or, in the absence of a designation, by the President of the Association. All expenses associated with preparing and recording an amendment to this Declaration shall be the sole responsibility of: (a) any Owners desiring an amendment as provided for in this Declaration or the Act; (b) Declarant, to the extent the right to amend this Declaration is reserved to Declarant and exercised by Declarant; or (c) in all other cases by the Association as a Common Expense. 18.4 When Modifications Permitted. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Declaration, no amendment or termination of this Declaration shall be effective in 111 eerkeleyL.e Segs Perch Owners A.., Sldl,Ded13SRn 1w PUD - .2 wp0 43 • PRELIMINARY DRAFT: SUBJECT TO REVISION any event during the Period of Declarant Control, unless the written approval of Declarant is first obtained. 18.5 Recording of Amendments. Any amendment to this Declaration made in accordance with this Article shall be immediately effective upon the recording of the executed amendment in the records of the Garfield County Clerk and Recorder together with a duly authenticated certificate of Declarant or the Secretary of the Association stating that the required vote of Owners, if any, and required consents of First Mortgagees (and/or Eligible First Mortgagee, as applicable) were obtained and are on file in the office of the Association. 18.6 Termination of the Planned Community. The Planned Community may only be terminated as provided in the Act. of 200 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Declarant has executed this Declaration this day The Berkeley Family Limited Partnership, • a Colorado Limited Partnership • By: STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ss. COUNTY OF GARFIELD ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 200, by as of The Berkeley Family Limited Partnership, a Colorado limited partnership. Witness my hand and official seal. My Commission Expires: ,1 `Bedew/ Me Springs Ranch Owners ±Ki asor Dec nmr, PUO 2.wpd 44 Notary Public Scenario: Lake Springs, PUD Fire Flow Analysis Junction Report Label Elevation (ft) Zone Type Base Flow (gpm) Pattern Demand (Calculated) (gpm) Calculated Hydraulic Grade (ft) Pressure (psi) BLK1-LOT13 6,929.00 Zone -1 Demand 9 Fixed 9 7,138.29 90.55 BLK1-LOT18 6,923.00 Zone -1 Demand 4 Fixed 4 7,138.29 93.15 BLK1-LOT3 6,933.00 Zone -1 Demand 3 Fixed 3 7,138.29 88.82 BLK2-LOT13 6,963.00 Zone -1 Demand 4 Fixed 4 7,138.29 75.84 BLK2-LOT16 6,923.00 Zone -1 Demand 4 Fixed 4 7,138.29 93.15 BLK2-LOT6 6,953.00 Zone -1 Demand 0 Fixed 0 7,138.30 80.17 BLK2-LOT9 6,942.00 Zone -1 Demand 3 Fixed 3 7,138.29 84.93 BLK3-LOT18 6,954.00 Zone -1 Demand 1 Fixed 1 7,138.35 79.76 BLK3-LOT3 6,937.00 Zone -1 Demand 4 Fixed 4 7,138.30 87.09 BLK3-LOT30 6,950.00 Zone -1 Demand 18 Fixed 18 7,138.30 81.47 BLK3-LOT6 6,950.00 Zone -1 Demand 18 Fixed 18 7,138.30 81.47 BLK4-LOT11 6,978.00 Zone -1 Demand 1 Fixed 1 7,138.37 69.38 BLK5-LOT1 7,149.00 Zone -1 Demand 0 Fixed 0 7,313.81 71.31 BLK5-LOT15 7,116.00 Zone -1 Demand 0 Fixed 0 7,313.81 85.58 BLK5-LOT22 7,050.00 Zone -1 Demand 0 Fixed 0 7,246.89 85.18 BLK5-LOT28 7,036.00 Zone -1 Demand 7 Fixed 7 7,246.89 91.24 BLK5-LOT29 7,057.00 Zone -1 Demand 0 Fixed 0 7,246.89 82.16 BLK5-LOT8 7,130.00 Zone -1 Demand 15 Fixed 15 7,313.80 79.52 BLK6-LOT14 7,200.00 Zone -1 Demand 2 Fixed 2 7,313.92 49.29 BLK6-LOT18 7,231.00 Zone -1 Demand 0 Fixed 0 7,313.94 35.89 BLK6-LOT21 7,236.00 Zone -1 Demand 3 Fixed 3 7,313.94 33.72 BLK6-LOT24 7,210.00 Zone -1 Demand 4 Fixed 4 7,313.92 44.96 BLK6-LOT25 7,191.00 Zone -1 Demand 2 Fixed 2 7,313.91 53.18 BLK6-LOT27 7,160.00 Zone -1 Demand 0 Fixed 0 7,313.89 66.58 BLK6-LOT29 7,158.00 Zone -1 Demand 0 Fixed 0 7,313.86 67.43 BLK6-LOT34 7,149.00 Zone -1 Demand 13 Fixed 13 7,313.81 71.31 BLK6-LOT35 7,160.00 Zone -1 Demand 3 Fixed 3 7,313.81 66.55 BLK6-LOT36 7,196.00 Zone -1 Demand 3 Fixed 3 7,313.91 51.01 BLK7-LOT 18 7,119.00 Zone -1 Demand 0 Fixed 0 7,313.82 84.29 BLK7-LOT10 7,057.00 Zone -1 Demand 1 Fixed 1 7,246.89 82.16 BLK7-LOT15 7,120.00 Zone -1 Demand 8 Fixed 8 7,313.82 83.86 BLK7-LOT20 7,113.00 Zone -1 Demand 0 Fixed 0 7,313.78 86.87 BLK7-LOT3 7,012.00 Zone -1 Demand 1 Fixed 1 7,138.41 54.69 BLK8-LOT1 6,952.00 Zone -1 Demand 0 Fixed 0 7,138.35 80.63 BLK8-LOT13 7,084.00 Zone -1 Demand 0 Fixed 0 7,246.87 70.47 BLK8-LOT16 7,102.00 Zone -1 Demand 18 Fixed 18 7,246.87 62.68 BLK8-LOT20 6,956.00 Zone -1 Demand 3 Fixed 3 7,138.35 78.90 BLK8-LOT5 6,964.00 Zone -1 Demand 4 Fixed 4 7,138.35 75.43 Title: Lake Springs, PUD 2021003.54 Project Engineer: Deric Walter j:\sdskproj\202\1003\dwg\watercad.wcd High Country Engineering, Inc. WaterCAD v5.0 [5.0032] 08/28/02 12:01:42 PM © Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Title: Project Engineer: Project Date: Comments: Project Inventory Lake Springs, PUD 2021003.54 Deric Walter 03/25/02 Revised WaterCAD analysis of demand and fire flow pressures Scenario Summary Scenario Physical Altemative Active Topology Alternative Demand Alternative Initial Settings Alternative Operational Alternative Logical Control Set Alternative Age Alternative Constituent Alternative Trace Alternative Fire Flow Alternative Capital Cost Alternative Energy Cost Alternative User Data Alternative Lake Springs, PUD Base -Physical Base -Active Topology Base -Average Daily Base -Initial Settings Base -Operational <All Logical Controls> Base -Age Alternative Base -Constituent Base -Trace Alternative Base -Fire Flow Base -Cost Base -Energy Cost Base -User Data Liquid Characteristics Liquid Water at 20C(68F) Kinematic Viscosity 1.0804e-5 ft2/s Specific Gravity 1.00 Network Inventory Pressure Pipes Number of Reservoirs Number of Pressure Junctions Number of Pumps - Constant Power: - One Point (Design Point): - Standard (3 Point): - Standard Extended: - Custom Extended: - Multiple Point: Number of Spot Elevations 48 0 38 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Number of Tanks - Constant Area: - Variable Area: Number of Valves - FCVs: - PBV's: - PRVs: - PSVs: - TCVs: - GPVs: 1 1 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 0 Pressure Pipes Inventory 8.0 in 10.0 in Total Length 24,770 ft 3,405 ft 29,109 ft 12.0 in 934 ft Title: Lake Springs, PUD 2021003.54 Project Engineer: Deric Walter j:\sdskproj\202\1003\dwg\watercad.wcd High Country Engineering, Inc. WaterCAD v5.0 [5.0032] 08/28/02 12:03:07 PM © Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Scenario Summary Report Scenario: Lake Springs, PUD Scenario Summary Physical Alternative Active Topology Alternative Demand Alternative Initial Settings Alternative Operational Alternative Logical Control Set Alternative Age Alternative Constituent Alternative Trace Alternative Fire Flow Alternative Capital Cost Altemative Energy Cost Alternative User Data Alternative Base -Physical Base -Active Topology Base -Average Daily Base -Initial Settings Base -Operational <All Logical Controls> Base -Age Alternative Base -Constituent Base -Trace Alternative Base -Fire Flow Base -Cost Base -Energy Cost Base -User Data Hydraulic Analysis Summary Analysis Friction Method Accuracy Trials Steady State Hazen -Williams Formula 0.001000 40 Quality Analysis Summary Analysis Constituent Age Tolerance 0.01 hr Trace Tolerance 1.0 % Quality Time Step Constituent Tolerance N/A hr 0.0 mg/I Global Adjustments Demand Operation Demand <None> 0.00 Roughness Operation Roughness <None> 0.00 Lake Springs, P.U.D. 2021003.54 Unit Demand = 1 EQR (350 gpd) F.S. = 3.0 (Peak Day) Fire Flow Demand = 1500 gpm for 2 -Hours with a PRV installed Created: 04/12/01 01:48:37 PM Title: Lake Springs, PUD 2021003.54 j: \sdskp roj\202\1003\dwg \watercad.wcd 08/28/02 12:02:44 PM © Haestad Methods, Inc. Project Engineer: Deric Walter High Country Engineering, Inc. WaterCAD v5.0 [5.0032] 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Title: Project Engineer: Project Date: Comments: Analysis Results Scenario: Lake Springs, PUD Fire Flow Analysis Lake Springs, PUD 2021003.54 Deric Walter 03/25/02 Revised WaterCAD analysis of demand and fire flow pressures Scenario Summary Scenario Physical Alternative Active Topology Alternative Demand Alternative Initial Settings Alternative Operational Alternative Logical Control Set Alternative Age Alternative Constituent Alternative Trace Alternative Fire Flow Alternative Capital Cost Alternative Energy Cost Alternative User Data Alternative Lake Springs, PUD Base -Physical Base -Active Topology Base -Average Daily Base -Initial Settings Base -Operational <All Logical Controis> Base -Age Alternative Base -Constituent Base -Trace Alternative Base -Fire Flow Base -Cost Base -Energy Cost Base -User Data Liquid Characteristics Liquid Kinematic Viscosity Water at 20C(68F) 1.0804e-5 ft2/s Specific Gravity 1.00 Network Inventory Pressure Pipes Number of Reservoirs Number of Pressure Junctions Number of Pumps - Constant Power: - One Point (Design Point): - Standard (3 Point): - Standard Extended: - Custom Extended: - Multiple Point: Number of Spot Elevations 48 0 38 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Number of Tanks - Constant Area: - Variable Area: Number of Valves - FCVs; - PBVs: - PRVs: - PSVs: - TCVs: - GPV's: 1 1 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 0 Pressure Pipes Inventory 8.0 in 10.0 in Total Length 24,770 ft 3,405 ft 29,109 ft 12.0 in 934 ft Pressure Junctions @ 0.00 hr Label Calculated Pressure Pressure Demand Hydraulic Grade (psi) Head (Calculated) (ft) (ft) (gpm) BLK1-LOT13 BLK1-LOT18 BLK1-LOT3 BLK2-LOT13 7,138.29 90.55 7,138.29 93.15 7,138.29 88.82 7,138.29 75.84 209.29 215.29 205.29 175.29 9 4 3 4 Title: Lake Springs, PUD 2021003.54 j:\sdskproj\202\1003\dwg\watercad.wcd 08/28/02 12:02:59 PM © Haestad Methods, Inc. Project Engineer: Deric Walter High Country Engineering, Inc. WaterCAD v5.0 [5.0032) 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 1 of 4 Analysis Results Scenario: Lake Springs, PUD Fire Flow Analysis Pressure Junctions @ 0.00 hr Label Calculated Pressure Pressure Hydraulic Grade (psi) Head (ft) (ft) Demand (Calculated) (gpm) BLK2-LOT16 BLK2-LOT6 BLK2-LOT9 BLK3-LOT18 BLK3-LOT3 BLK3-LOT30 BLK3-LOT6 BLK4-LOT11 BLK5-LOT1 BLK5-LOT15 BLK5-LOT22 BLK5-LOT28 BLK5-LOT29 BLK5-LOT8 BLK6-LOT14 BLK6-LOT18 BLK6-LOT21 BLK6-LOT24 BLK6-LOT25 BLK6-LOT27 BLK6-LOT29 BLK6-LOT34 BLK6-LOT35 BLK6-LOT36 BLK7-LOT 18 BLK7-LOT10 BLK7-LOT15 BLK7-LOT20 BLK7-LOT3 BLK8-LOT1 BLK8-LOT13 BLK8-LOT16 BLK8-LOT20 BLK8-LOT5 7,138.29 7,138.30 7,138.29 7,138.35 7,138.30 7,138.30 7,138.30 7,138.37 7,313.81 7,313.81 7,246.89 7,246.89 7,246.89 7,313.80 7,313.92 7,313.94 7,313.94 7,313.92 7,313.91 7,313.89 7,313.86 7,313.81 7,313.81 7,313.91 7,313.82 7,246.89 7,313.82 7,313.78 7,138.41 7,138.35 7,246.87 7,246.87 7,138.35 7,138.35 93.15 215.29 80.17 185.30 84.93 196.29 79.76 184.35 87.09 201.30 81.47 188.30 81.47 188.30 69.38 160.37 71.31 164.81 85.58 197.81 85.18 196.89 91.24 210.89 82.16 189.89 79.52 183.80 49.29 113.92 35.89 82.94 33.72 77.94 44.96 103.92 53.18 122.91 66.58 153.89 67.43 155.86 71.31 164.81 66.55 153.81 51.01 117.91 84.29 194.82 82.16 189.89 83.86 193.82 86.87 200.78 54.69 126.41 80.63 186.35 70.47 162.87 62.68 144.87 78.90 182.35 75.43 174.35 4 0 3 1 4 18 18 1 0 0 0 7 0 15 2 0 3 4 2 0 0 13 3 3 0 1 8 0 1 0 0 18 3 4 Pressure Pipes @ 0.00 hr Label Control Discharge Velocity Upstream Structure Downstream Structure Calculated Status (gpm) (ft/s) Hydraulic Grade Hydraulic Grade Friction (ft) (ft) Headloss (ft) Calculated Pressure Headloss Minor Pipe Gradient Headloss Headloss (ft/1000ft) (ft) (ft) P-1 P-2 P-3 P-4 P-5 P-6 P-7 P-8 Open Open Open Open Open Open Open Open 0 0.00 -36 0.23 4 0.02 -4 0.03 -15 0.10 0 0.00 4 0.02 0 0.00 7,246.87 7,138.30 7,138.29 7,138.29 7,138.30 7,138.35 7,138.35 7,313.81 7,246.87 7,138.37 7,138.29 7,138.29 7,138.30 7,138.35 7,138.35 7,313.81 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 Title: Lake Springs, PUD 2021003.54 Project Engineer: Deric Walter j:\sdskproj\202\1003\dwg\watercad.wcd High Country Engineering, Inc. WaterCAD v5.0 [5.0032] 08/28/02 12:02:59 PM © Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 2 of 4 Analysis Results Scenario: Lake Springs, PUD Fire Flow Analysis Pressure Pipes @ 0.00 hr Label Control Discharge Velocity Upstream Structure Downstream Structure Calculated Calculated Pressure Headloss Status (gpm) (ft/s) Hydraulic Grade Hydraulic Grade Friction Minor Pipe Gradient (ft) (ft) Headloss Headloss Headloss (ft/1000ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) P-9 Open 2 0.01 7,313.92 7,313.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 P-10 Open -153 0.43 7,313.94 7,314.00 0.06 0.00 0.06 0.06 P-11 Open -3 0.02 7,313.91 7,313.91 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 P-12 Open 3 0.02 7,313.81 7,313.81 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 P-13 Open -0 0.00 7,246.89 7,246.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 P-14 Open -66 0.42 7,313.81 7,313.81 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 P-15 Open 18 0.11 7,246.87 7,246.87 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 P-16 Open -78 0.32 7,313.91 7,313.92 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.04 P-17 Open -84 0.34 7,313.92 7,313.94 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.05 P-18 Open 69 0.28 7,313.94 7,313.94 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.03 P-19 Open -9 0.04 7,138.29 7,138.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 P-20 Open -16 0.10 7,138.29 7,138.30 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 P-21 Open -16 0.10 7,138.30 7,138.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 P-22 Open -49 0.31 7,138.30 7,138.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 P-23 Open -30 0.19 7,138.30 7,138.35 0.05 0.00 0.05 0.02 P-24 Open 3 0.02 7,138.35 7,138.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 P-25 Open 82 0.52 7,246.89 7,246.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.16 P-26 Open 7 0.04 7,138.35 7,138.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 P-27 Open 75 0.48 7,246.89 7,246.88 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.12 P-28 Open 38 0.24 7,138.37 7,138.35 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.03 P-29 Open 51 0.33 7,313.81 7,313.78 0.03 0.00 0.03 0.06 P-30 Open 100 0.64 7,313.78 7,313.68 0.10 0.00 0.10 0.20 P-31 Open 2 0.01 7,138.29 7,138.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 P-32 Open -5 0.03 7,138.29 7,138.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 P-33 Open 100 0.64 7,246.91 7,246.89 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.20 P-34 Open 75 0.48 7,138.45 7,138.41 0.04 0.00 0.04 0.12 P-35 Open 74 0.47 7,138.41 7,138.37 0.04 0.00 0.04 0.11 P-36 Open -11 0.07 7,138.29 7,138.30 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 P-37 Open -7 0.04 7,246.89 7,246.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 P-38 Open -7 0.04 7,246.89 7,246.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 P-39 Open -15 0.09 7,313.80 7,313.81 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 P-40 Open -15 0.09 7,313.81 7,313.81 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 P-41 Open 17 0.11 7,246.89 7,246.87 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.01 P-42 Open -57 0.36 7,313.82 7,313.86 0.04 0.00 0.04 0.07 P-43 Open -72 0.30 7,313.89 7,313.91 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.04 P-44 Open 66 0.42 7,313.94 7,313.89 0.05 0.00 0.05 0.09 P-45 Open -49 0.31 7,313.78 7,313.82 0.04 0.00 0.04 0.05 P-46 Open 8 0.05 7,313.82 7,313.82 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 P-47 Open -82 0.33 7,313.81 7,313.86 0.05 0.00 0.05 0.05 P-48 Open -139 0.57 7,313.86 7,313.89 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.12 PRVs @ 0.00 hr Label Control From To Discharge Velocity Headloss Calculated Status HGL HGL (gpm) (ft/s) (ft) Pressure (ft) (ft) Setting (psi) PRV-1 PRV-2 Throttling 7,313.68 7,246.91 100 1.13 66.77 80.00 Throttling 7,246.88 7,138.45 75 0.85 108.42 40.00 ' . D 2021003.54 Project Engineer: Deric Walter j:\sdskproj\202\1003\dwg\watercad.wcd High Country Engineering, Inc. WaterCAD v5.015.0032] 08/28/02 12:02:59 PM © Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 3 of 4 Analysis Results Scenario: Lake Springs, PUD Fire Flow Analysis PRVs @ 0.00 hr Label Control From To Discharge Velocity Headloss Calculated Status HGL HGL (gpm) (ft/s) (ft) Pressure (ft) (ft) Setting (psi) PRV-3 Closed 7,313.81 7,246.89 0 0.00 0.00 85.00 PRV-4 Closed 7,246.87 7,138.35 0 0.00 0.00 20.00 Tanks @ 0.00 hr Label Calculated Calculated Pressure Calculated Calculated Inflow Outflow Current Hydraulic Grade Level (psi) Percent Volume (gpm) (gpm) Status (ft) (ft) Full (gal) (%) TANK 7,314.00 12.00 5.19 100.0 411,063.3 -153 153 Draining Title: Lake Springs, PUD 2021003.54 Project Engineer: Deric Walter j:\sdskproj\202\1003\dwg\watercad.wcd High Country Engineering, Inc. WaterCAD v5.0 [5.0032] 08/28/02 12:02:59 PM © Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 4 of 4 Scenario: Lake Springs, PUD Fire Flow Analysis Junction Report Label Elevation Zone Type Base Flow Pattern Demand Calculated Pressure (ft) (gpm) (Calculated) Hydraulic Grade (psi) (gpm) (ft) BLK1-LOT13 6,929.00 Zone -1 Demand 9 Fixed 9 7,138.29 90.55 BLK1-LOT18 6,923.00 Zone -1 Demand 4 Fixed 4 7,138.29 93.15 BLK1-LOT3 6,933.00 Zone -1 Demand 3 Fixed 3 7,138.29 88.82 BLK2-LOT13 6,963.00 Zone -1 Demand 4 Fixed 4 7,138.29 75.84 BLK2-LOT16 6,923.00 Zone -1 Demand 4 Fixed 4 7,138.29 93.15 BLK2-LOT6 6,953.00 Zone -1 Demand 0 Fixed 0 7,138.30 80.17 BLK2-LOT9 6,942.00 Zone -1 Demand 3 Fixed 3 7,138.29 84.93 BLK3-LOT18 6,954.00 Zone -1 Demand 1 Fixed 1 7,138.35 79.76 BLK3-LOT3 6,937.00 Zone -1 Demand 4 Fixed 4 7,138.30 87.09 BLK3-LOT30 6,950.00 Zone -1 Demand 18 Fixed 18 7,138.30 81.47 BLK3-LOT6 6,950.00 Zone -1 Demand 18 Fixed 18 7,138.30 81.47 BLK4-LOT11 6,978.00 Zone -1 Demand 1 Fixed 1 7,138.37 69.38 BLK5-LOT1 7,149.00 Zone -1 Demand 0 Fixed 0 7,313.81 71.31 BLK5-LOT15 7,116.00 Zone -1 Demand 0 Fixed 0 7,313.81 85.58 BLK5-LOT22 7,050.00 Zone -1 Demand 0 Fixed 0 7,246.89 85.18 BLK5-LOT28 7,036.00 Zone -1 Demand 7 Fixed 7 7,246.89 91.24 BLK5-LOT29 7,057.00 Zone -1 Demand 0 Fixed 0 7,246.89 82.16 BLK5-LOT8 7,130.00 Zone -1 Demand 15 Fixed 15 7,313.80 79.52 BLK6-LQT14 7,200.00 Zone -1 Demand 2 Fixed 2 7,313.92 49.29 BLK6-LOT18 7,231.00 Zone -1 Demand 0 Fixed 0 7,313.94 35.89 BLK6-LOT21 7,236.00 Zone -1 Demand 3 Fixed 3 7,313.94 33.72 BLK6-LOT24 7,210.00 Zone -1 Demand 4 Fixed 4 7,313.92 44.96 BLK6-LOT25 7,191.00 Zone -1 Demand 2 Fixed 2 7,313.91 53.18 BLK6-LOT27 7,160.00 Zone -1 Demand 0 Fixed 0 7,313.89 66.58 BLK6-LOT29 7,158.00 Zone -1 Demand 0 Fixed 0 7,313.86 67.43 BLK6-LOT34 7,149.00 Zone -1 Demand 13 Fixed 13 7,313.81 71.31 BLK6-LOT35 7,160.00 Zone -1 Demand 3 Fixed 3 7,313.81 66.55 BLK6-LOT36 7,196.00 Zone -1 Demand 3 Fixed 3 7,313.91 51.01 BLK7-LOT 18 7,119.00 Zone -1 Demand 0 Fixed 0 7,313.82 84.29 BLK7-LOT10 7,057.00 Zone -1 Demand 1 Fixed 1 7,246.89 82.16 BLK7-LOT15 7,120.00 Zone -1 Demand 8 Fixed 8 7,313.82 83.86 BLK7-LOT20 7,113.00 Zone -1 Demand 0 Fixed 0 7,313.78 86.87 BLK7-LQT3 7,012.00 Zone -1 Demand 1 Fixed 1 7,138.41 54.69 BLK8-LOT1 6,952.00 Zone -1 Demand 0 Fixed 0 7,138.35 80.63 BLK8-LOT13 7,084.00 Zone -1 Demand 0 Fixed 0 7,246.87 70.47 BLK8-LOT16 7,102.00 Zone -1 Demand 18 Fixed 18 7,246.87 62.68 BLK8-LOT20 6,956.00 Zone -1 Demand 3 Fixed 3 7,138.35 78.90 BLK8-LOT5 6,964.00 Zone -1 Demand 4 Fixed 4 7,138.35 75.43 Title: Lake Springs, PUD 2021003.54 Project Engineer: Deric Walter j:\sdskproj\202\1003\dwg\watercad.wcd High Country Engineering, Inc. WaterCAD v5.0 [5.0032] 08/28/02 12:01:42 PM © Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Scenario: Lake Springs, PUD Fire Flow Analysis Valve Report Label Elevation Diameter Minor Control Discharge From To Headloss (ft) (in) Loss Status (gpm) HGL HGL (ft) Coefficient (ft) (ft) PRV-1 7,062.00 6.0 0.00 Throttling 100 7,313.68 7,246.91 66.77 PRV-2 7,046.00 6.0 0.00 Throttling 75 7,246.88 7,138.45 108.42 PRV-3 7,050.00 6.0 0.00 Closed 0 7,313.81 7,246.89 0.00 PRV-4 7,084.00 6.0 0.00 Closed 0 7,246.87 7,138.35 0.00 Title: Lake Springs, PUD 2021003.54 Project Engineer: Deric Walter j:\sdskproj\202\1003\dwg\watercad.wcd High Country Engineering, Inc. WaterCAD v5.0 [5.0032] 08/28/02 12:02:00 PM © Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Scenario: Lake Springs, PUD Fire Flow Analysis Tank Report Calculated Percent Full (%) 100.0 Title: Lake Springs, PUD 2021003.54 j:\sdskproj\202\1003\dw lwatercad.wcd Project Engineer: Deric Walter g 08/28/02 12:02:15 PM © Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside uRoadEnWaterbury, CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 WaterCAD vPage 1 of[5.0032] Label Zone Base Elevation (ft) Minimum Elevation (ft) Initial HGL (ft) Maximum Elevation (ft) Inactive Volume (gal) Tank Diameter (ft) Inflow (gpm) Current Status Calculated Hydraulic Grade (ft) TANK Zone -1 7,302.00 7,302.50 7,314.00 7,314.00 0.0 78.00 -153 Draining 7,314.00 Calculated Percent Full (%) 100.0 Title: Lake Springs, PUD 2021003.54 j:\sdskproj\202\1003\dw lwatercad.wcd Project Engineer: Deric Walter g 08/28/02 12:02:15 PM © Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside uRoadEnWaterbury, CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 WaterCAD vPage 1 of[5.0032] Title: Project Engineer: Project Date: Comments: Project Inventory Lake Springs, PUD 2021003.54 Deric Walter 03/25/02 Revised WaterCAD analysis of demand and fire flow pressures Scenario Summary Scenario Physical Alternative Active Topology Alternative Demand Alternative Initial Settings Alternative Operational Alternative Logical Control Set Alternative Age Alternative Constituent Altemative Trace Alternative Fire Flow Alternative Capital Cost Alternative Energy Cost Alternative User Data Alternative Lake Springs, PUD Base -Physical Base -Active Topology Base -Average Daily Base -Initial Settings Base -Operational <All Logical Controls> Base -Age Alternative Base -Constituent Base -Trace Alternative Base -Fire Flow Base -Cost Base -Energy Cost Base -User Data Liquid Characteristics Liquid Kinematic Viscosity Water at 20C(68F) 1.0804e-5 ft2/s Specific Gravity 1.00 Network Inventory Pressure Pipes Number of Reservoirs Number of Pressure Junctions Number of Pumps - Constant Power: - One Point (Design Point): - Standard (3 Point): - Standard Extended: - Custom Extended: - Multiple Point: Number of Spot Elevations 48 0 38 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Number of Tanks - Constant Area: - Variable Area: Number of Valves - FCVs: - PBVs: - PRVs: - PSVs: - TCVs: - GPVs: 1 1 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 0 Pressure Pipes Inventory 8.0 in 10.0 in Total Length 24,770 ft 3,405 ft 29,109 ft 12.0 in 934 ft Title: Lake Springs, PUD 2021003.54 j:\sdskproj1202110031dwg\watercad.wcd 08/28/02 12:03:07 PM © Haestad Methods, Inc. High Country Engineering, Inc. Project Engineer: Deric Walter 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 WaterCAD vPage•1 of 1 Scenario Summary Report Scenario: Lake Springs, PUD Scenario Summary Physical Alternative Active Topology Alternative Demand Alternative Initial Settings Alternative Operational Alternative Logical Control Set Alternative Age Alternative Constituent Alternative Trace Alternative Fire Flow Alternative Capital Cost Altemative Energy Cost Alternative User Data Alternative Base -Physical Base -Active Topology Base -Average Daily Base -Initial Settings Base -Operational <All Logical Controls> Base -Age Alternative Base -Constituent Base -Trace Alternative Base -Fire Flow Base -Cost Base -Energy Cost Base -User Data Hydraulic Analysis Summary Analysis Friction Method Accuracy Trials Steady State Hazen -Williams Formula 0.001000 40 Quality Analysis Summary Analysis Constituent Age Tolerance 0.01 hr Trace Tolerance 1.0 Quality Time Step Constituent Tolerance N/A hr 0.0 mg/I Global Adjustments Demand Operation Demand <None> 0.00 Roughness Operation Roughness <None> 0.00 Lake Springs, P.U.D. 2021003.54 Unit Demand = 1 EQR (350 gpd) F.S. = 3.0 (Peak Day) Fire Flow Demand = 1500 gpm for 2 -Hours with a PRV installed Created: 04/12/01 01:48:37 PM Title: Lake Springs, PUD 2021003.54 Project Engineer: Deric Walter j:\sdskproj\202\1003\dwg\watercad.wcd High Country Engineering, Inc. WaterCAD v5.0 [5.0032] 08/28/02 12:02:44 PM © Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Title: Project Engineer: Project Date: Comments: Analysis Results Scenario: Lake Springs, PUD Fire Flow Analysis Lake Springs, PUD 2021003.54 Deric Walter 03/25/02 Revised WaterCAD analysis of demand and fire flow pressures Scenario Summary Scenario Physical Alternative Active Topology Alternative Demand Alternative Initial Settings Alternative Operational Alternative Logical Control Set Alternative Age Alternative Constituent Alternative Trace Alternative Fire Flow Alternative Capital Cost Alternative Energy Cost Alternative User Data Alternative Lake Springs, PUD Base -Physical Base -Active Topology Base -Average Daily Base -Initial Settings Base -Operational <All Logical Controls> Base -Age Alternative Base -Constituent Base -Trace Alternative Base -Fire Flow Base -Cost Base -Energy Cost Base -User Data Liquid Characteristics Liquid Kinematic Viscosity Water at 20C(68F) 1.0804e-5 ft2/s Specific Gravity 1.00 Network Inventory Pressure Pipes Number of Reservoirs Number of Pressure Junctions Number of Pumps - Constant Power: - One Point (Design Point): - Standard (3 Point): - Standard Extended: - Custom Extended: - Multiple Point: Number of Spot Elevations 48 0 38 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Number of Tanks - Constant Area: - Variable Area: Number of Valves - FCVs: - PBVs: - PRVs: - PSVs: - TCVs: - GPVs: 1 1 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 0 Pressure Pipes Inventory 8.0 in 10.0 in Total Length 24,770 ft 3,405 ft 29,109 ft 12.0 in 934 ft Pressure Junctions @ 0.00 hr Label Calculated Pressure Pressure Demand Hydraulic Grade (psi) Head (Calculated) (ft) (ft) (gpm) BLK1-LOT13 BLK1-LOT18 BLK1-LOT3 BLK2-LOT13 7,138.29 7,138.29 7,138.29 7,138.29 90.55 93.15 88.82 75.84 209.29 215.29 205.29 175.29 9 4 3 4 Title: Lake Springs, PUD 2021003.54 Project Engineer: Deric Walter j:\sdskproj\202\1003\dwg\watercad.wcd High Country Engineering, Inc. WaterCAD v5.0 [5.0032] 08/28/02 12:02:59 PM © Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 1 of 4 Analysis Results Scenario: Lake Springs, PUD Fire Flow Analysis Pressure Junctions @ 0.00 hr Label Calculated Pressure Pressure Demand Hydraulic Grade (psi) Head (Calculated) (ft) (ft) (gpm) BLK2-LOT16 BLK2-LOT6 BLK2-LOT9 BLK3-LOT18 BLK3-LOT3 BLK3-LOT30 BLK3-LOT6 BLK4-LOT11 BLK5-LOT1 BLK5-LOT15 BLK5-LOT22 BLK5-LOT28 BLK5-LOT29 BLK5-LOT8 BLK6-LOT14 BLK6-LOT18 BLK6-LOT21 BLK6-LOT24 BLK6-LOT25 BLK6-LOT27 BLK6-LOT29 BLK6-LOT34 BLK6-LOT35 BLK6-LOT36 BLK7-LOT 18 BLK7-LOT10 BLK7-LOT15 BLK7-LOT20 BLK7-LOT3 BLK8-LOT1 BLK8-LOT13 BLK8-LOT16 BLK8-LOT20 BLK8-LOT5 7,138.29 93.15 215.29 " 7,138.30 80.17 185.30 7,138.29 84.93 196.29 7,138.35 79.76 184.35 7,138.30 87.09 201.30 7,138.30 81.47 188.30 7,138.30 81.47 188.30 7,138.37 69.38 160.37 7,313.81 71.31 164.81 7,313.81 85.58 197.81 7,246.89 85.18 196.89 7,246.89 91.24 210.89 7,246.89 82.16 189.89 7,313.80 79.52 183.80 7,313.92 49.29 113.92 7,313.94 35.89 82.94 7,313.94 33.72 77.94 7,313.92 44.96 103.92 7,313.91 53.18 122.91 7,313.89 66.58 153.89 7,313.86 67.43 155.86 7,313.81 71.31 164.81 7,313.81 66.55 153.81 7,313.91 51.01 117.91 7,313.82 84.29 194.82 7,246.89 82.16 189.89 7,313.82 83.86 193.82 7,313.78 86.87 200.78 7,138.41 54.69 126.41 7,138.35 80.63 186.35 7,246.87 70.47 162.87 7,246.87 62.68 144.87 7,138.35 78.90 182.35 7,138.35 75.43 174.35 4 0 3 1 4 18 18 1 0 0 0 7 0 15 2 0 3 4 2 0 0 13 3 3 0 1 8 0 1 0 0 18 3 4 Pressure Pipes @ 0.00 hr Label Control Discharge Velocity Upstream Structure Downstream Structure Calculated Calculated Pressure Headloss Status (gpm) (ft/s) Hydraulic Grade Hydraulic Grade Friction Minor Pipe Gradient (ft) (ft) Headloss Headloss Headloss (ft/1000ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) P-1 P-2 P-3 P-4 P-5 P-6 P-7 P-8 Open Open Open Open Open Open Open Open 0 -36 4 -4 -15 0 4 0 0.00 0.23 0.02 0.03 0.10 0.00 0.02 0.00 7,246.87 7,138.30 7,138.29 7,138.29 7,138.30 7,138.35 7,138.35 7,313.81 7,246.87 7,138.37 7,138.29 7,138.29 7,138.30 7,138.35 7,138.35 7,313.81 0,00 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 Title: Lake Springs, PUD 2021003.54 j:\sdskproj\202\1003\dwg\watercad.wcd High Country Engineering, Inc. 08/28/02 12:02:59 PM © Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA +1 - Project Engineer: Deric Walter WaterCAD v5.0 [5.0032] 203-755-1666 Page 2 of 4 Analysis Results Scenario: Lake Springs, PUD Fire Flow Analysis PRVs @ 0.00 hr Label Control From To Discharge Velocity Headioss Calculated Status HGL HGL (gpm) (ft/s) (ft) Pressure (ft) (ft) Setting (psi) PRV-3 Closed 7,313.81 7,246.89 0 0.00 0.00 85.00 PRV-4 Closed 7,246.87 7,138.35 0 0.00 0.00 20.00 Tanks @ 0.00 hr Label Calculated Calculated Pressure Calculated Calculated Inflow Outflow Current Hydraulic Grade Level (psi) Percent Volume (gpm) (gpm) Status (ft) (ft) Full (gal) (%) TANK 7,314.00 12.00 5.19 100.0 411,063.3 -153 153 Draining Title: Lake Springs, PUD 2021003.54 Project Engineer: Deric Walter j:\sdskproj\202\1003\dwg\watercad.wcd High Country Engineering, Inc. WaterCAD v5.0 [5.0032] 08/28/02 12:02:59 PM © Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 4 of 4 Analysis Results Scenario: Lake Springs, PUD Fire Flow Analysis Pressure Pipes @ 0.00 hr Label Control Discharge Velocity Upstream Structure Downstream Structure Calculated Calculated Pressure Headloss Status (gpm) (ft/s) Hydraulic Grade Hydraulic Grade Friction Minor Pipe Gradient (ft) (ft) Headloss Headloss Headloss (ft/1000ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) P-9 Open 2 0.01 7,313.92 7,313.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 P-10 Open -153 0.43 7,313.94 7,314.00 0.06 0.00 0.06 0.06 P-11 Open -3 0.02 7,313.91 7,313.91 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 P-12 Open 3 0.02 7,313.81 7,313.81 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 P-13 Open -0 0.00 7,246.89 7,246.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 P-14 Open -66 0.42 7,313.81 7,313.81 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 P-15 Open 18 0.11 7,246.87 7,246.87 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 P-16 Open -78 0.32 7,313.91 7,313.92 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.04 P-17 Open -84 0.34 7,313.92 7,313.94 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.05 P-18 Open 69 0.28 7,313.94 7,313.94 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.03 P-19 Open -9 0.04 7,138.29 7,138.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 P-20 Open -16 0.10 7,138.29 7,138.30 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 P-21 Open -16 0.10 7,138.30 7,138.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 P-22 Open -49 0.31 7,138.30 7,138.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 P-23 Open -30 0.19 7,138.30 7,138.35 0.05 0.00 0.05 0.02 P-24 Open 3 0.02 7,138.35 7,138.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 P-25 Open 82 0.52 7,246.89 7,246.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.16 P-26 Open 7 0.04 7,138.35 7,138.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 P-27 Open 75 0.48 7,246.89 7,246.88 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.12 P-28 Open 38 0.24 7,138.37 7,138.35 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.03 P-29 Open 51 0.33 7,313.81 7,313.78 0.03 0.00 0.03 0.06 P-30 Open 100 0.64 7,313.78 7,313.68 0.10 0.00 0.10 0.20 P-31 Open 2 0.01 7,138.29 7,138.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 P-32 Open -5 0.03 7,138.29 7,138.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 P-33 Open 100 0.64 7,246.91 7,246.89 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.20 P-34 Open 75 0.48 7,138.45 7,138.41 0.04 0.00 0.04 0.12 P-35 Open 74 0.47 7,138.41 7,138.37 0.04 0.00 0.04 0.11 P-36 Open -11 0.07 7,138.29 7,138.30 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 P-37 Open -7 0.04 7,246.89 7,246.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 P-38 Open -7 0.04 7,246.89 7,246.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 P-39 Open -15 0.09 7,313.80 7,313.81 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 P-40 Open -15 0.09 7,313.81 7,313.81 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 P-41 Open 17 0.11 7,246.89 7,246.87 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.01 P-42 Open -57 0.36 7,313.82 7,313.86 0.04 0.00 0.04 0.07 P-43 Open -72 0.30 7,313.89 7,313.91 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.04 P-44 Open 66 0.42 7,313.94 7,313.89 0.05 0.00 0.05 0.09 P-45 Open -49 0.31 7,313.78 7,313.82 0.04 0.00 0.04 0.05 P-46 Open 8 0.05 7,313.82 7,313.82 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 P-47 Open -82 0.33 7,313.81 7,313.86 0.05 0.00 0.05 0.05 P-48 Open -139 0.57 7,313.86 7,313.89 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.12 PRVs @ 0.00 hr Label Control From To Discharge Velocity Headloss Calculated Status HGL HGL (gpm) (ft/s) (ft) Pressure (ft) (ft) Setting (psi) PRV-1 Throttling 7,313.68 7,246.91 100 1.13 66.77 80.00 PRV-2 Throttling 7,246.88 7,138.45 75 0.85 108.42 40.00 Title. Lake Springs, PUD 2021003.54 Project Engineer: Deric Walter j:\sdskproj\202\1003\dwg\watercad.wcd High Country Engineering, Inc. WaterCAD v5.0 [5.0032] 08/28/02 12:02:59 PM © Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 3 of 4 Scenario: Lake Springs, PUD Fire Flow Analysis Valve Report Label Elevation Diameter Minor Control Discharge From To Headloss (ft) (in) Loss Status (gpm) HGL HGL (ft) Coefficient (ft) (ft) PRV-1 7,062.00 6.0 0.00 Throttling 100 7,313.68 7,246.91 66.77 PRV-2 7,046.00 6.0 0.00 Throttling 75 7,246.88 7,138.45 108.42 PRV-3 7,050.00 6.0 0.00 Closed 0 7,313.81 7,246.89 0.00 PRV-4 7,084.00 6.0 0.00 Closed 0 7,246.87 7,138.35 0.00 Title: Lake Springs, PUD 2021003.54 Project Engineer: Deric Walter j:\sdskproj\202\1003\dwg\watercad.wcd High Country Engineering, Inc. WaterCAD v5.0 [5.0032] 08/28/02 12:02:00 PM © Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Label TANK Scenario: Lake Springs, PUD Fire Flow Analysis Tank Report Zone Zone -1 Base Elevation (ft) Minimum Elevation (ft) Initial HGL (ft) Maximum Elevation (ft) Inactive Volume (gal) Tank Diameter (ft) Inflow (gprn) 7,302.00 7,302.50) 7,314.00 7,314.00 0.0 78.00 -153 Current Status Calculated Hydraulic Grade (ft) Calculated Percent Fut (%) Draining 7,314.00 100.0 Title: Lake Springs, PUD 2021003.54 j:lsdskproj1202110031dwg1watercad.wcd High Country Engineering, Inc. Project Engineer: Deric Walter 08/28/02 12:02:15 PM © Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 WaterCAD v5.0[e.f P 1 o 1 Page 1 of 1 G&'tech September 9, 2002 Mike and Maci Berkeley c/o Land Design Partnership Attention: Mr. Ron Liston 918 Cooper Avenue Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. 5020 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Phone: 970-945-7988 Fax: 970-945-8454 hpgeo@hpgeotech.com Job No. 197 348 Subject: Geotechnical Review of the Lake Springs Ranch PUD, County Roads 114 and 119, Garfield County, Colorado Dear Mr. Liston: As requested, we have reviewed the current preliminary development plan for the proposed Lake Springs Ranch PUD with respect to potential geologic and geotechnical engineering constraints. We previously submitted a preliminary geotechnical engineering report for a similar but smaller PUD at the project site (Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, 1997). Also, we have reviewed two letters concerning the project submitted to the Garfield County Planning Department by the Colorado Geological Survey (Colorado Geological Survey, 2001 and 2002). This letter summarizes the finding of our review and presents recommendations pertaining to the current preliminary development plan. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT It is our understanding that the project is in the preliminary planning stages. Project infolluation available for our review was a preliminary plan showing the proposed lots, building envelopes and street locations. Grading plans showing the extent of grading for the streets have been prepared by High Country Engineering, but were not included in this review. The currently proposed PUD will be a 193 lot single family residential development with 4 cluster home tracts, and 6 areas zoned agricultural/open space. The single family lots are typically about one acre in size with a 15,000 square foot building envelope. The cluster housing tracts cover about 4 to 10 acres each. The agriculture/open space areas are located on the Spring Valley floor and in the steeper parts of the property. A street system will provide primary access to the lots. On lot driveways and grading for building sites will be the responsibility of individual lot owners. Water will be supplied by a central water system and the development will be serviced by the Spring Valley Sanitation system. It appears that the preliminary plan we reviewed differs somewhat from the plans reviewed by the Colorado Geological Survey. The current PUD differs from the proposed development at the time of our previous geotechnical study (Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, 1997). The lot density has increased, new development areas have been Mike and Maci Berkeley September 9, 2002 Page 2 added, some deleted and the street pattern has changed. FINDINGS OF REVTFW Although the currently proposed development has substantially changed since our August 1997 preliminary geotechnical study, the conclusions and recommendations presented in that study are applicable to the currently proposed PUD. There are several conditions of a geologic and geotechnical nature that should be considered in project planning and design as discussed below. Evaporite Deformation: The project site is located in the Carbondale evaporite collapse center, a roughly circular region with a diameter of about 16 miles centered near Carbondale and covering about 200 square miles (Kirkham and Widmann, 1997). The towns of Carbondale, Glenwood Springs and El Jebel are located in the collapse center. As much as 4,000 feet of regional subsidence is believed to have occurred in the collapse center as the result of dissolution and flowage of evaporite from beneath the region. Much of this subsidence may have occurred within the past 10 million years (Kirkham and Widmann, 1997). If this is the case, the long-term average subsidence rate was about 0.5 inch per 100 years. There is some local evidence of evaporite deformation as recently as the late Pleistocene in the Carbondale collapse center, but no definitive evidence of defounation during the Holocene, within about the past 10,000 years (Widmann and Others, 1998). Regional geologic mapping shows that the gradational contacts between (1) the "Spring Valley landslide", (2) evaporite collapse debris, and (3) basalt flows deformed by regional evaporite subsidence are present in the project area (Kirkham and Widmann, 1997). They described the "Spring Valley landslide" as collapse debris with a horizontal component of movement. The "Spring Valley landslide" was not mapped separately on the geology map accompanying our August 1997 study because we were not able to find definitive field criteria for separating the "Spring Valley landslide" from adjacent areas shown as collapse debris and deformed basalt flow on the regional geology map. In our opinion, all three features appear to have a common geologic origin and the "Spring Valley landslide" does not present a greater defoilliation hazard than the collapse debris and deformed basalt flows shown on the regional map. It is uncertain if evaporite deformation is still active in the Carbondale collapse center, or if defoituation has stopped. If evaporite deformation is still active, it appears to be taking place over a broad area, except possibly along faults, and there is no evidence of rapid deformation rates in the modern landscape. Because of this, the risk of evaporite associated problems with typical residential building at the project site appears to be low and no greater than other areas in the collapse center. We are not aware of evaporite deformation related problems in the region. Prospective building owners should be Mike and Maci Berkeley September 9, 2002 Page 3 made aware of the potential low risk of evaporite deformation. It the low risk is not acceptable to building owners, it can be reduced by the use of heavily reinforced foundation system preferably without a basement. Faults: We concur with the regional mapping by the Colorado Geological Survey that two faults likely cross through the eastern part of the project area (Kirkham and Widmann, 1997). If evaporite deformation is still active, then there is potential for localized differential movement along the faults. Development is not planned near the eastern one of the two faults, but 8 single family lots are proposed near the western one of the two faults. It is recommend that buildings not be located within 50 feet of the mapped fault trace unless site specific studies show that a fault is not present or, if present, the fault is not geologically young. Foundation Conditions: The general foundation conditions in the project area were evaluated by drilling 9 exploratory borings in August 1997. At that time, buildings were not proposed in areas where lake deposits are present. As presently planned, several building areas will be underlain by lake deposits. It is recommended that additional subsurface exploration be made in these areas to evaluate the engineering characteristics of the lake deposits. Our August 1997 preliminary study concluded that spread footing foundations appear suitable in areas where expansive soil conditions are not present. Spread footings with minimum dead load pressure, a structural mat or drilled piers were considered feasible foundation systems in areas with expansive soil conditions are present. The recommended foundation system will depend on the site specific expansion potential. Also, a structural floor system over a crawlspace may be warranted depending on the expansion potential at a specific building site. A site specific foundation study by the individual lot owners should be conducted for design level recommendations. Construction Related Slope Instability: We do not anticipate major problems with construction related slope instability if our August 1997 grading recommendations are followed. More extensive grading should be evaluated on a site specific basis. As previously recommended, cut and fill should not exceed 10 feet deep and cut and fill slopes should be 2:1 (horizontal to vertical) or flatter. We should review the proposed grading plans when available and determine if addition subsurface exploration and analysis are needed. Storm Water Management: Drainages in the project area are ephemeral and their streams only have surface flow following heavy precipitation and snow melt. We did not find geologic conditions that should be considered by the hydrologic study in developing an appropriate water management plan for the project. The only Mike and Maci Berkeley September 9, 2002 Page 4 stream channel in the project area with a relatively large off site drainage basin is located in the northern part of the project site in the vicinity of proposed Lots 11, 12 and 13. Access to Lot 12 from the proposed cul-de-sac will require a stream channel crossing. The channel crossing should be designed for the appropriate flood discharge and include provisions for a high sediment concentration flooding. Hydrologic analysis in this area should also consider flood flow velocities and the need for channel erosion stabilization to protect proposed Lots 11, 12 and 13. Earthquake Considerations: The project area could experience earthquake related ground shaking. Modified Mercalli Intensity VI ground shaking should be expected during a reasonable service life for the development, but the probability for stronger ground shaking is low. Intensity VI ground shaking is felt by most people and causes general alarm, but results in negligible damage to structures of good design and construction. Occupied structures should be designed to withstand moderately strong ground shaking with little or no damage and not to collapse under stronger ground shaking. The region is in the Uniform Building Code, Seismic Risk Zone 1. Based on our current understanding of the earthquake hazard in this part of Colorado, we see no reason to increase the commonly accepted seismic risk zone for the area. LIMITATIONS This study was conducted according to generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area, at this time. We make no warranty either express or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this review is based on the currently proposed development and information in our August 1997 preliminary geotechnical study. Our findings in this report and our previous study include interpolation and extrapolation of the subsurface conditions identified at the exploratory borings and variations in the subsurface conditions may not become evident until excavation is performed. If conditions encountered during construction appear different from those described in our previous preliminary geotechincal report, we should be notified so that re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made. This report has been prepared exclusively for our client and is a review of the current development plans with respect to our previous preliminary geotechnical study. We are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. As the project evolves, we should provide continued consultation, conduct additional evaluations and review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations. Significant design changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommendations presented herein and in our previous preliminary geotechincal report. We recommend site specific subsoil studies for individual lot development, observation of excavations and foundation bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a representative of the geotechnical engineer. . Mike and Maci Berkeley September 9, 2002 Page 5 Respectfully submitted, HEPWORTH - PAWLAK Steven L. Pawlak, P.E and by: 1. ock Engineering Geologist RGM/djb cc: High Country Engineering - Attn: Deric Walter REFERENCES Colorado Geological Survey, 2001, Lake Springs Ranch PUD, Garfield County, Colorado: Prepared for the Garfield Planning Department (CGS Case No. GA - 02 -0004, November 5, 2001). Colorado Geological Survey, 2002, Lake Springs Ranch PUD Preliminary Plan: Prepared for the Garfield Planning Department (CGS Review No. GA -03-002, July 31, 2002). Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, 1997, Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Study, Proposed Lake Springs Ranch PUD, County Roads 114 and 119, Garfield County, Colorado: Prepared for Mike and Maci Berkely c/o Land Design Partnership, Glenwood Springs, Colorado (Job No. 197 348, August 29, 1997). Kirkham, R.M. and Widmann, B.L., 1997, Geology Map of the Carbondale Quadrangle, Garfield County, Colorado: Colorado Geological Survey Open File 97-3. Widmann B. L. and Others, 1998, Preliminary Quaternary Fault and Fold Map and Data Base of Colorado: Colorado Geological Survey Open File Report 98-8. Aug -12-02 10:OOA P.O. Box 1908 1005 Cooper Ave. Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 l T.AraCreitiLl.44 41D 4SSOC44 TES, Et4QNEEI1f G COMSt1LTOIT5 July 25. 2002 Mr. John Gabert CO Division of Water Resources 1313 Sherman Street, Room 818 Denver, CO 80203 P 02 (970) 945-5700 (970) 945-1253 Fax RE: Berkeley Family Partnership Well Permits 54292 F and 54293 F Dear John: The above two well permits expire August 16, 2002 and we wish to extend them tor one year. Our check for $120.00 is attached. if you have any questions, please call our office at (970) 945-5700. Very truly yours, Zancanella & Associates, Inc. Thomas A. Zancanella, P.E. Attachment cc: Dr. Michael Berkeley Ron Liston John Schenk Z:197D00'5197407 Lake Springs Sub.. Dr. 8erkelev12002\welisD-E-ext.wpd Rug -07-02 03:09P P-02 Mr. John Gabert CO Division of Water Resources 1313 Sherman Street, Room 818 Denver, CO 80203 July 25, 2002 RE: Berkeley Family Partnership Well Permits 54292 F and 54293 F Dear John: The above two well permits expire August 16, 2002 and we wish to extend them for one year. Our check for $120.00 is attached. If you have any questions, please call our office at (970) 945-5700. Very truly yours, Zancanella & Associates, Inc, FILE COPY Thomas A. Zancanella, P.E. Attachment cc: Dr. Michael Berkeley Ron Liston John Schenk Z;\97OO)'y1Qa/401 Lake Springs Sub., Dr. Berkeley120021wel$SD-E-ext.wpd P.O. Bar 100$ 1005 Coopor Av+. Olormood Opr • CO $1eect Ai 4 U 41 February 19, 2002 Dr. Michael Berkeley Lake Springs Ranch 3961 County Road 114 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 RE: Welts Dear Mike: 0) sob-6700 svr i2Vt Fez In reference to your question on the wells, below is a summary of the welts. Well CIA -11 - #55366F (Sod farm well) - Statement of Beneficial Use filed January 30, 2002. Weft A - #54820 F - Permit extended to November 7, 2092_ At expiration, we will need to file a Statement of Beneficial Use or apply for a hew permit; Welt D - #56292 F - Permit expire • , . hiSrweli is for the subdivision. This permit can be extended title!! E - #56293 F -- Permit subdivision. This perrnit can be e is well is also for the If you have any questions, please call our office at (970) 945-5700. Very truly yours. Zancsneila & Associatas, Inc. Thomas A. Zancanelia. P.E. x: Scott 3alcomb Ron Liston John Schenk L'974009t97a0T2002\bakeley-welts.wpd TO CoL HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC. 517 Blake Ave., Ste 101 lenwood Springs, CO 81601 (970) 945-8676 (970) 945-2555 fax bRA,�6 6triot-.o61Z-AL- SUR -`1E1-1 1 N 4-7'v R,v_ 1313 cri . R 15 Kweit. CO Y c ATrN i . C AZi- FAX NO Sheet _ of We are sending the following: (an employee -owned company) Civil Engineering • GPS & Land Surveying ❑ 14 Inverness Dr. East, Ste. D136 Englewood, CO 80112 (303) 925-0544 (303) 925-0547 fax www.hceng.com 9 H 6Z DATE SUBJECT ❑ Grand Junction, CO 80501 (970) 858-0933 (970) 858-0275 fax bots-ePUD JOB NO. HOZ (IC- MARK. Zifikki No. of Copies ITEM REMARKS I kP. 6 Eb T AGN 1-TEr. R1024 --4f 4J S i U 1- sE R_otto SI-VoL F-c•PDsJ5t. l X Pcc-' 1I J P fibJ 5LPE5 ANID 6E61_,5 -c_ Ti c E -)0 =-7-s F3,-‘..) -Ey I i nti . TIC. 1 ?,� &75 . -14€1- P Li I 1 -44.1 --TS iKZ.L r7 RF 17�ss-n.S FE -72_ OU2. -p, US I'Y.T . i -> iK_s/ Go/ Macc4-(4,EL__. e-----„,). Ths,Aa-L -,7 - 10 If material received is not listed above, kindly notify us at once. Transmitted by: ❑ First class mail 1 U.P.S. Next Day Air ❑ Federal Express 0 U.S. Express Mail ❑ U.P.S. Std. Service ❑ OSM ❑ Pickup ❑FAX o HCE Hand Deliver By: WALTZR., r7/Gh' COUNT,y Project LAKE- 3P 163 ''UD Job No. 2-0z I bOAsft By w Date -545)o2 Ck'd by Date Subject AATMCAD Page of ✓v�tz— UN1t5 L j/ owe- _ 2 /QQ 3D c7) ' 0 /- K. YeGi I Rk I ..,1•710(A. `t_ i l ' T i 1 1 T--; j 2 Dd - =7$ /34' i fthrniu41 ___ =1 / 09 H Englewood, CO 14 Invemess Drive East, Suite B-144 • Englewood, CO 80112 (3031925-0544 phone • (3031925-0547 fax Glenwood Springs, CO 923 Cooper Ave. • Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 (9701945-8676 phone • (9701945-2555 fax LAKE SPRINGS, PUD Job No. 2021003.54 Watercad Analysis March 25, 2002 k:\wp\gprodata\file\202\1003\watercad.xls Single/Multi-family = 350 gpd/unit * 3.0 = 1050 gpd Junction # Units BLK1-LOT 13 13 BLK1-LOT 18 5 Total Demand (gpd) 13650 5250 Total Demand (gpm) 9.479 3.646 BLK1-LOT 3 4 BLK2-LOT 13 6 BLK2-LOT 16 6 4200 6300 6300 2.917 4.375 4.375 BLK2-LOT 6 0 0 0.000 BLK2-LOT 9 4 BLK3-LOT 18 1 BLK3-LOT 3 5 BLK3-LOT 30 24 BLK3-LOT 6 24 4200 1050 5250 25200 25200 2.917 0.729 3.646 17.500 17.500 BLK4-LOT 11 1 BLK5-LOT 1 0 BLK5-LOT 28 9 1050 0 9450 0.729 0.000 6.563 BLK5-LOT 29 0 0 0.000 BLK5-LOT 8 20 BLK6-LOT 14 3 BLK6-LOT 18 0 BLK6-LOT 21 4 BLK6-LOT 24 6 BLK6-LOT 25 3 21000 3150 0 4200 6300 3150 14.583 2.188 0.000 2.917 4.375 2.188 BLK6-LOT 34 18 BLK6-LOT 35 (Cluster) 4 BLK6-LOT 36 (Cluster) 4 BLK7-LOT 10 1 BLK7-LOT 15 11 18900 4200 4200 1050 11550 13.125 2.917 2.917 0.729 8.021 BLK7-LOT 20 0 0 0.000 BLK7-LOT 3 1 1050 0.729 BLK8-LOT 1 0 0 0.000 BLK8-LOT 16 (with Cluster) 24 BLK8-LOT 20 (Cluster) 4 BLK8-LOT 5 5 210 Tota 25200 4200 5250 17.500 2.917 3.646 220500 153.125 G3 25 '0 °1`'\ —i co m / i r\ 9 0o O w / ( O1 / 1141°\---:/// £ I r 1 /'o / 'r`•• 6-i , / / $./ Z x \ I f 0 c O 1,2 \ 01 rn \� 73 i N BERKELEY FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO LAKE SPRINGS, P.U.D. WATERCAD ANALYSIS JUNCTION/PIPE LAYOUT HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC. 1517 BLAKE AVENUE. STE, 101 14 65€68 DRIVE EAST, ME. 0136 GLENWOOD 651115, CO 81601 ENGLEWOOD, CO 60112 111(1970) 945-6676 PH(3031 925-0554 17(1970) 945-2555 FX.(303) 925-0547 DES. DJW NO. DATE REVISION BY DR. DJW 1. 6/28/02 ADD ADDITIONAL WATER MAIN LOOPS DJW CK. DATE 3/25/02 FILEWAT.RCAD Title: Project Engineer: Project Date: Comments: Project Inventory Lake Springs, PUD 2021003.54 Deric Walter 03/25/02 Revised WaterCAD analysis of demand and fire flow pressures Scenario Summary Scenario Physical Alternative Active Topology Alternative Demand Alternative Initial Settings Alternative Operational Alternative Logical Control Set Alternative Age Alternative Constituent Alternative Trace Alternative Fire Flow Alternative Capital Cost Alternative Energy Cost Alternative User Data Alternative Lake Springs, PUD Base -Physical Base -Active Topology Base -Average Daily Base -Initial Settings Base -Operational <All Logical Controls> Base -Age Alternative Base -Constituent Base -Trace Alternative Base -Fire Flow Base -Cost Base -Energy Cost Base -User Data Liquid Characteristics Liquid Water at 20C(68F) Kinematic Viscosity 1.0804e-5 ft2/s Specific Gravity 1.00 Network Inventory Pressure Pipes Number of Reservoirs Number of Pressure Junctions Number of Pumps - Constant Power: - One Point (Design Point): - Standard (3 Point): - Standard Extended: - Custom Extended: - Multiple Point: Number of Spot Elevations 48 0 38 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Number of Tanks - Constant Area: - Variable Area: Number of Valves - FCVs: - PBV's: - PRVs: - PSV's: - TCV's: - GPVs: 1 1 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 0 Pressure Pipes Inventory 8.0 in 10.0 in Total Length 24,770 ft 3,405 ft 29,109 ft 12.0 in 934 ft Title: Lake Springs, PUD 2021003.54 Project Engineer: Deric Walter j:\sdskproj\202\1003\dwg\watercad.wcd High Country Engineering, Inc. WaterCAD v5.0 [5.0032] 08/28/02 12:03:07 PM © Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Scenario Summary Report Scenario: Lake Springs, PUD Scenario Summary Physical Alternative Active Topology Alternative Demand Alternative Initial Settings Alternative Operational Alternative Logical Control Set Alternative Age Alternative Constituent Alternative Trace Alternative Fire Flow Alternative Capital Cost Alternative Energy Cost Alternative User Data Alternative Base -Physical Base -Active Topology Base -Average Daily Base -Initial Settings Base -Operational <All Logical Controls> Base -Age Alternative Base -Constituent Base -Trace Alternative Base -Fire Flow Base -Cost Base -Energy Cost Base -User Data Hydraulic Analysis Summary Analysis Friction Method Accuracy Trials Steady State Hazen -Williams Formula 0.001000 40 Quality Analysis Summary Analysis Constituent Age Tolerance 0.01 hr Trace Tolerance 1.0 % Quality Time Step Constituent Tolerance N/A hr 0.0 mg/I Global Adjustments Demand Operation Demand <None> 0.00 Roughness Operation Roughness <None> 0.00 Lake Springs, P.U.D. 2021003.54 Unit Demand = 1 EQR (350 gpd) F.S. = 3.0 (Peak Day) Fire Flow Demand = 1500 gpm for 2 -Hours with a PRV installed Created: 04/12/01 01:48:37 PM Title: Lake Springs, PUD 2021003.54 Project Engineer: Deric Walter j:\sdskproj\202\1003\dwg\watercad.wcd High Country Engineering, Inc. WaterCAD v5.0 [5.0032] 08/28/02 12:02:44 PM © Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Title: Project Engineer: Project Date: Comments: Analysis Results Scenario: Lake Springs, PUD Fire Flow Analysis Lake Springs, PUD 2021003.54 Deric Walter 03/25/02 Revised WaterCAD analysis of demand and fire flow pressures Scenario Summary Scenario Physical Alternative Active Topology Alternative Demand Alternative Initial Settings Alternative Operational Alternative Logical Control Set Alternative Age Alternative Constituent Alternative Trace Alternative Fire Flow Alternative Capital Cost Alternative Energy Cost Alternative User Data Alternative Lake Springs, PUD Base -Physical Base -Active Topology Base -Average Daily Base -Initial Settings Base -Operational <All Logical Controls> Base -Age Alternative Base -Constituent Base -Trace Alternative Base -Fire Flow Base -Cost Base -Energy Cost Base -User Data Liquid Characteristics Liquid Kinematic Viscosity Water at 20C(68F) 1.0804e-5 ft2/s Specific Gravity 1.00 Network Inventory Pressure Pipes 48 Number of Reservoirs 0 Number of Pressure Junctions 38 Number of Pumps 0 - Constant Power: 0 - One Point (Design Point): 0 - Standard (3 Point): 0 - Standard Extended: 0 - Custom Extended: 0 - Multiple Point: 0 Number of Spot Elevations 0 Number of Tanks - Constant Area: - Variable Area: Number of Valves - FCVs: - PBVs: - PRVs: - PSV's: - TCV's: - GPV's: 1 1 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 0 Pressure Pipes Inventory 8.0 in 10.0 in Total Length 24,770 ft 3,405 ft 29,109 ft 12.0 in 934 ft Pressure Junctions @ 0.00 hr Label Calculated Pressure Pressure Demand Hydraulic Grade (psi) Head (Calculated) (ft) (ft) (gpm) BLK1-LOT13 BLK1-LOT18 BLK1-LOTS BLK2-LOT13 7,138.29 7,138.29 7,138.29 7,138.29 90.55 93.15 88.82 75.84 209.29 215.29 205.29 175.29 9 4 3 4 Title: Lake Springs, PUD 2021003.54 Project Engineer: Deric Walter j:\sdskproj\202\1003\dwg\watercad.wcd High Country Engineering, Inc. WaterCAD v5.0 [5.0032] 08/28/02 12:02:59 PM © Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 1 of 4 Analysis Results Scenario: Lake Springs, PUD Fire Flow Analysis Pressure Junctions @ 0.00 hr Label Calculated Pressure Pressure Demand Hydraulic Grade (psi) Head (Calculated) (ft) (ft) (gpm) BLK2-LOT16 BLK2-LOT6 BLK2-LOT9 BLK3-LOT18 BLK3-LOT3 BLK3-LOT30 BLK3-LOT6 BLK4-LOT11 BLK5-LOT1 BLK5-LOT15 BLK5-LOT22 BLK5-LOT28 BLK5-LOT29 BLK5-LOT8 BLK6-LOT14 BLK6-LOT18 BLK6-LOT21 BLK6-LOT24 BLK6-LOT25 BLK6-LOT27 BLK6-LOT29 BLK6-LOT34 BLK6-LOT35 BLK6-LOT36 BLK7-LOT 18 BLK7-LOT10 BLK7-LOT15 BLK7-LOT20 BLK7-LOT3 BLK8-LOT1 BLK8-LOT13 BLK8-LOT16 BLK8-LOT20 BLK8-LOT5 7,138.29 7,138.30 7,138.29 7,138.35 7,138.30 7,138.30 7,138.30 7,138.37 7,313.81 7,313.81 7,246.89 7,246.89 7,246.89 7,313.80 7,313.92 7,313.94 7,313.94 7,313.92 7,313.91 7,313.89 7,313.86 7,313.81 7,313.81 7,313.91 7,313.82 7,246.89 7,313.82 7,313.78 7,138.41 7,138.35 7,246.87 7,246.87 7,138.35 7,138.35 93.15 215.29 4 80.17 185.30 0 84.93 196.29 3 79.76 184.35 1 87.09 201.30 4 81.47 188.30 18 81.47 188.30 18 69.38 160.37 1 71.31 164.81 0 85.58 197.81 0 85.18 196.89 0 91.24 210.89 7 82.16 189.89 0 79.52 183.80 15 49.29 113.92 2 35.89 82.94 0 33.72 77.94 3 44.96 103.92 4 53.18 122.91 2 66.58 153.89 0 67.43 155.86 0 71.31 164.81 13 66.55 153.81 3 51.01 117.91 3 84.29 194.82 0 82.16 189.89 1 83.86 193.82 8 86.87 200.78 0 54.69 126.41 1 80.63 186.35 0 70.47 162.87 0 62.68 144.87 18 78.90 182.35 3 75.43 174.35 4 Pressure Pipes @ 0.00 hr Label Control Discharge Velocity Upstream Structure Downstream Structure Calculated Calculated Pressure Headloss Status (gpm) (ft/s) Hydraulic Grade Hydraulic Grade Friction Minor Pipe Gradient (ft) (ft) Headloss Headloss Headloss (ft/1000ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) P-1 P-2 P-3 P-4 P-5 P-6 P-7 P-8 Open Open Open Open Open Open Open Open 0 -36 4 -4 -15 0 4 0 0.00 0.23 0.02 0.03 0.10 0.00 0.02 0.00 7,246.87 7,138.30 7,138.29 7,138.29 7,138.30 7,138.35 7,138.35 7,313.81 7,246.87 7,138.37 7,138.29 7,138.29 7,138.30 7,138.35 7,138.35 7,313.81 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 Title: Lake Springs, PUD 2021003.54 j:\sdskproj\202\1003\dwg\watercad.wcd High Country Engineering, Inc. 08/28/02 12:02:59 PM © Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA +1 Project Engineer: Deric Walter WaterCAD v5.0 [5.0032] -203-755-1666 Page 2 of 4 Analysis Results Scenario: Lake Springs, PUD Fire Flow Analysis Pressure Pipes @ 0.00 hr Label Control Discharge Velocity Upstream Structure Downstream Structure Calculated Calculated Pressure Headloss Status (gpm) (ft/s) Hydraulic Grade Hydraulic Grade Friction Minor Pipe Gradient (ft) (ft) Headloss Headloss Headloss (ft/1000ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) P-9 Open 2 0.01 7,313.92 7,313.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 P-10 Open -153 0.43 7,313.94 7,314.00 0.06 0.00 0.06 0.06 P-11 Open -3 0.02 7,313.91 7,313.91 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 P-12 Open 3 0.02 7,313.81 7,313.81 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 P-13 Open -0 0.00 7,246.89 7,246.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 P-14 Open -66 0.42 7,313.81 7,313.81 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 P-15 Open 18 0.11 7,246.87 7,246.87 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 P-16 Open -78 0.32 7,313.91 7,313.92 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.04 P-17 Open -84 0.34 7,313.92 7,313.94 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.05 P-18 Open 69 0.28 7,313.94 7,313.94 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.03 P-19 Open -9 0.04 7,138.29 7,138.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 P-20 Open -16 0.10 7,138.29 7,138.30 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 P-21 Open -16 0.10 7,138.30 7,138.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 P-22 Open -49 0.31 7,138.30 7,138.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 P-23 Open -30 0.19 7,138.30 7,138.35 0.05 0.00 0.05 0.02 P-24 Open 3 0.02 7,138.35 7,138.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 P-25 Open 82 0.52 7,246.89 7,246.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.16 P-26 Open 7 0.04 7,138.35 7,138.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 P-27 Open 75 0.48 7,246.89 7,246.88 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.12 P-28 Open 38 0.24 7,138.37 7,138.35 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.03 P-29 Open 51 0.33 7,313.81 7,313.78 0.03 0.00 0.03 0.06 P-30 Open 100 0,64 7,313.78 7,313.68 0.10 0.00 0.10 0.20 P-31 Open 2 0.01 7,138.29 7,138.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 P-32 Open -5 0.03 7,138.29 7,138.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 P-33 Open 100 0.64 7,246.91 7,246.89 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.20 P-34 Open 75 0.48 7,138.45 7,138.41 0.04 0.00 0.04 0.12 P-35 Open 74 0.47 7,138.41 7,138.37 0.04 0.00 0.04 0.11 P-36 Open -11 0.07 7,138.29 7,138.30 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 P-37 Open -7 0.04 7,246.89 7,246.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 P-38 Open -7 0.04 7,246.89 7,246.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 P-39 Open -15 0.09 7,313.80 7,313.81 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 P-40 Open -15 0.09 7,313.81 7,313.81 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 P-41 Open 17 0.11 7,246.89 7,246.87 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.01 P-42 Open -57 0.36 7,313.82 7,313.86 0.04 0.00 0.04 0.07 P-43 Open -72 0.30 7,313.89 7,313.91 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.04 P-44 Open 66 0.42 7,313.94 7,313.89 0.05 0.00 0.05 0.09 P-45 Open -49 0.31 7,313.78 7,313.82 0.04 0.00 0.04 0.05 P-46 Open 8 0.05 7,313.82 7,313.82 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 P-47 Open -82 0.33 7,313.81 7,313.86 0.05 0.00 0.05 0.05 P-48 Open -139 0.57 7,313.86 7,313.89 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.12 PRVs @ 0.00 hr Label Control From To Discharge Velocity Headloss Calculated Status HGL HGL (gpm) (ft/s) (ft) Pressure (ft) (ft) Setting (psi) PRV-1 Throttling 7,313.68 7,246.91 100 1.13 66.77 80.00 PRV-2 Throttling 7,246.88 7,138.45 75 0.85 108.42 40.00 Title -take -Springs; PUD 20-21-003.54 Project Engineer: Deric Walter j:\sdskproj\202\1003\dwg\watercad.wcd High Country Engineering, Inc. WaterCAD v5.0 [5.0032] 08/28/02 12:02:59 PM © Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 3 of 4 Analysis Results Scenario: Lake Springs, PUD Fire Flow Analysis PRVs @ 0.00 hr Label Control From To Discharge Velocity Headloss Calculated Status HGL HGL (gpm) (ft/s) (ft) Pressure (ft) (ft) Setting (psi) PRV-3 Closed 7,313.81 7,246.89 0 0.00 0.00 85.00 PRV-4 Closed 7,246.87 7,138.35 0 0.00 0.00 20.00 Tanks @ 0.00 hr Label Calculated Calculated Pressure Calculated Calculated Inflow Outflow Current Hydraulic Grade Level (psi) Percent Volume (gpm) (gpm) Status (ft) (ft) Full (gal) (%) TANK 7,314.00 12.00 5.19 100.0 411,063.3 -153 153 Draining Title: Lake Springs, PUD 2021003.54 Project Engineer: Deric Walter j:\sdskproj\202\1003\dwg\watercad.wcd High Country Engineering, Inc. WaterCAD v5.0 [5.0032] 08/28/02 12:02:59 PM © Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 4 of 4 Scenario: Lake Springs, PUD Fire Flow Analysis Junction Report Label Elevation (ft) Zone Type Base Flow (gpm) Pattern Demand (Calculated) (gpm) Calculated Hydraulic Grade (ft) Pressure (psi) BLK1-LOT13 6,929.00 Zone -1 Demand 9 Fixed 9 7,138.29 90.55 BLK1-LOT18 6,923.00 Zone -1 Demand 4 Fixed 4 7,138.29 93.15 BLK1-LOT3 6,933.00 Zone -1 Demand 3 Fixed 3 7,138.29 88.82 BLK2-LOT13 6,963.00 Zone -1 Demand 4 Fixed 4 7,138.29 75.84 BLK2-LOT16 6,923.00 Zone -1 Demand 4 Fixed 4 7,138.29 93.15 BLK2-LOT6 6,953.00 Zone -1 Demand 0 Fixed 0 7,138.30 80.17 BLK2-LOT9 6,942.00 Zone -1 Demand 3 Fixed 3 7,138.29 84.93 BLK3-LOT18 6,954.00 Zone -1 Demand 1 Fixed 1 7,138.35 79.76 BLK3-LOT3 6,937.00 Zone -1 Demand 4 Fixed 4 7,138.30 87.09 BLK3-LOT30 6,950.00 Zone -1 Demand 18 Fixed 18 7,138.30 81.47 BLK3-LOT6 6,950.00 Zone -1 Demand 18 Fixed 18 7,138.30 81.47 BLK4-LOT11 6,978.00 Zone -1 Demand 1 Fixed 1 7,138.37 69.38 BLK5-LOT1 7,149.00 Zone -1 Demand 0 Fixed 0 7,313.81 71.31 BLK5-LOT15 7,116.00 Zone -1 Demand 0 Fixed 0 7,313.81 85.58 BLK5-LOT22 7,050.00 Zone -1 Demand 0 Fixed 0 7,246.89 85.18 BLK5-LOT28 7,036.00 Zone -1 Demand 7 Fixed 7 7,246.89 91.24 BLK5-LOT29 7,057.00 Zone -1 Demand 0 Fixed 0 7,246.89 82.16 BLK5-LOT8 7,130.00 Zone -1 Demand 15 Fixed 15 7,313.80 79.52 BLK6-LOT14 7,200.00 Zone -1 Demand 2 Fixed 2 7,313.92 49.29 BLK6-LOT18 7,231.00 Zone -1 Demand 0 Fixed 0 7,313.94 35.89 BLK6-LOT21 7,236.00 Zone -1 Demand 3 Fixed 3 7,313.94 33.72 BLK6-LOT24 7,210.00 Zone -1 Demand 4 Fixed 4 7,313.92 44.96 BLK6-LOT25 7,191.00 Zone -1 Demand 2 Fixed 2 7,313.91 53.18 BLK6-LOT27 7,160.00 Zone -1 Demand 0 Fixed 0 7,313.89 66.58 BLK6-LOT29 7,158.00 Zone -1 Demand 0 Fixed 0 7,313.86 67.43 BLK6-LOT34 7,149.00 Zone -1 Demand 13 Fixed 13 7,313.81 71.31 BLK6-LOT35 7,160.00 Zone -1 Demand 3 Fixed 3 7,313.81 66.55 BLK6-LOT36 7,196.00 Zone -1 Demand 3 Fixed 3 7,313.91 51.01 BLK7-LOT 18 7,119.00 Zone -1 Demand 0 Fixed 0 7,313.82 84.29 BLK7-LOT10 7,057.00 Zone -1 Demand 1 Fixed 1 7,246.89 82.16 BLK7-LOT15 7,120.00 Zone -1 Demand 8 Fixed 8 7,313.82 83.86 BLK7-LOT20 7,113.00 Zone -1 Demand 0 Fixed 0 7,313.78 86.87 BLK7-LOT3 7,012.00 Zone -1 Demand 1 Fixed 1 7,138.41 54.69 BLK8-LOT1 6,952.00 Zone -1 Demand 0 Fixed 0 7,138.35 80.63 BLK8-LOT13 7,084.00 Zone -1 Demand 0 Fixed 0 7,246.87 70.47 BLK8-LOT16 7,102.00 Zone -1 Demand 18 Fixed 18 7,246.87 62.68 BLK8-LOT20 6,956.00 Zone -1 Demand 3 Fixed 3 7,138.35 78.90 BLK8-LOT5 6,964.00 Zone -1 Demand 4 Fixed 4 7,138.35 75.43 Title: Lake Springs, PUD 2021003.54 Project Engineer: Deric Walter j:\sdskproj\202\1003\dwg\watercad.wcd High Country Engineering, Inc. WaterCAD v5.0 [5.0032] 08/28/02 12:01:42 PM © Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Scenario: Lake Springs, PUD Fire Flow Analysis Valve Report Label Elevation Diameter Minor Control Discharge From To Headloss (ft) (in) Loss Status (gpm) HGL HGL (ft) Coefficient (ft) (ft) PRV-1 7,062.00 6.0 0.00 Throttling 100 7,313.68 7,246.91 66.77 PRV-2 7,046.00 6.0 0.00 Throttling 75 7,246.88 7,138.45 108.42 PRV-3 7,050.00 6.0 0.00 Closed 0 7,313.81 7,246.89 0.00 PRV-4 7,084.00 6.0 0.00 Closed 0 7,246.87 7,138.35 0.00 Title: Lake Springs, PUD 2021003.54 Project Engineer: Deric Walter j:\sdskproj\202\1003\dwg\watercad.wcd High Country Engineering, Inc. WaterCAD v5.0 [5.0032] 08/28/02 12:02:00 PM © Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Scenario: Lake Springs, PUD Fire Flow Analysis Tank Report Label Zone Base Elevation (ft) Minimum Elevation (ft) Initial HGL (ft) Maximum Elevation (ft) Inactive Volume (gal) Tank Diameter (ft) Inflow (gpm) Current Status Calculated Hydraulic Grade (ft) Calculated Percent Full (%) TANK Zone -1 7,302.00 7,302.50 7,314.00 7,314.00 0.0 78.00 -153 Draining 7,314.00 100.0 Title: Lake Springs, PUD 2021003.54 Project Engineer: Deric Walter j:\sdskproj\202\1003\dwg\watercad.wcd High Country Engineering, Inc. WaterCAD v5.0 (5.0032] 08/28/02 12:02:15 PM © Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 1 of 1 oui 'spoytaW PeaseeH pp co CO W CO W W CO W W W W W W W W W W W W W CO CO W CO W CO W W W W W W CO W CO W CO W r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r- r r r r r r r r r r r- r r r r XWWWWWXWXXAWAWXXXXX 03 CO Oo CO (p V J J J J 0) (T CS) (P (A 0) 01 C) CD 0) (n CT (n Cn (n (n A 0) W W WN) N rr-rrrrrr-r== rrrr(rrr=rrrrr-r-rrr1-rrrr-rrrrrrr 00000000000000000000000000000000000000 H ---1H - -1 -1 -i -i -1 -1 -1 -i-i -i -1 -1 -1 -i -i -1 -1 -i -t -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -i -i -1 -i -1 - (n N -+ W n, ,w W W Nm N N N J 00 N N N -+ -+ 0) W W .- (O 0) W 0 O) CO 0 Cn 0 W 0) CA A CO J (n A J CO A (D CO N 01 -. O CD mw cow (- 0 0 NN N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33333333333333333333333333333333333333 (D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (D (D (D (D (D 0 0 (D T (D (D 0 0 (D 0 0 0 (D 0 0 (D (D 0 (D (D (D J J J J J. J J J.. J. J J J J....J J J J J _. J �a J.... J J. J J J N 07 0 _ _ — J J 0) J J -a J J J ........ J J CO J J J J J J s J J J J J J -. J J J WIT. p10 O 11 O (n C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C c C C C C C C C C C C C C C (D C 0 CD (D (D (D (D (D (D (D CD CD CD CD (D CD CD (D CD CD CD (D (D (D CD CD (D CD CD (D CD 0 CD CD CD CD (D (D CD CD WT N _. N QT a O •.)F c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c 0 (D CD ID CD CD CD (D CD (D (D CD CD CD CD (D 0 0 CD CD CD CD 0 (D CD 0 CD CD 0 (D CD 0 0 CD CD CD CD (D Satisfies Fire Flow Constraints? JJ J J J J J J in in in in in in in in in in in in in in in in in in in in in in in in in in in in in in in in in in in in in in o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O 0 0 0 0 0 O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T Z -0 N CD .. 0 icii *a W N J J W CO W W CO CO CO W CO W CO CO CO CO W CO N W W W N W CO W W W W N W N N N N N O N O1 J O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N O O O A O O O O O O N O N N N N N3 0,0000.000.000.000-00000.0.0.000.. CO Cn 00.0.0.00.0.00.000.00.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.O D �0 0 Z1 N. O Q fD J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J in in in in in in in in in in in in in in in in to in in in in in in in in in in in in in in in in in in in in in 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -a o 0 0 0 0 0 o J o 0 0 0 0 o -n -a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A W 00 O O J O 0 J O W W W O O N A W O N Cn 0 J 0 0 0 0O (b A J W O A A W A (D Z (o m -1 0 0 0 3 0 m " a co N -. J co W co co co W W W CO CO W CO W CO CO CO N CO CO W N W W W W W W N W N N N N N O N in '-70000000 O O O O O O O O O N O O O A O O O O O O N O N N N N N 0 (n W A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -+ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 (0 0 0 J J 0 0 01 0 (n(nn 01(n ( A W O Cn O O (b -+ O W W W O O N A W O N (n O J O (D O -+ 0 W A J W O A A W A O D (D (om) m -I .0-50 3 Q* (ll v 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 00000000000000000000000000000000000000 66.066666666666666666666666666666666666 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MX (D -01,)(D v. O) a m m Co 0) N N Cn A 01 A J 01 N N A CN 01 A Co N N N N O) 0)J N A C31 W W N 0) A W A N W W W 01 0) O J J A A Cb 0 03 (b W A O N 0 A W (O N O CD 01 0 0) A W W A V -+ N O 00 J 0) J CO (b O J j N N 6'06 0) W W J A A W 01 W O) O (D O O) O N -' (b W (n O W O 01 W J J (O A -i O (D W (D W W 0 N J A (71-‘N A O N Cn O J (3) J MCA NW (n N (0 0 -' Cn 00 N -,JA mem 10 0 w a C .� c C N (p (v (D — a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 00000000000000000000000000000000000000 6666666666666666666.0666666666666666666 00000000000000000000000000000000000000 Minimum Zone Pressure (psi) N N (j N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N CO O N 0) 0) 0) O) 0) 0) (A W W O) 0) (A (D J 0) (D W 01 CD O 0) 0) O) 0) 0) 0) CD 0) CO (D CO CO CO N N 6.-n N N N N N (n N N N N Cn CD W J 0O W N N N O N N N N N N N N N N N N N 0 W 0 0 0 W CO CO Cb 00 CO Co CO CO Cb CO N N Cn N J CO CD CO 0 OD CO Cb CO CO (A W CD CO W W W W - KN m ON n 0 to 7 3 C -: c (D C N p 96 a 07 CO CO W CO CO W CO CO W W CO CO W CO CO CO W W CO W W W CO W CO W W W W CO W OJ W W 07 CO W r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r 0) rn rn m w rn CO 0 CO rn 0 0 0) CO rn rn rn rn 0 rn 0 rn CD 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 rn rn 0) 0) rn 0) 0) rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr 00000000000000000000000000000000000000 -1 --i N N --i -i -1 -1 -i -1 -1 -i -1 -1 -1 -i -1 -ji -i -1 -1 -i -1 -i 0) -i -1 -I -1 -i -1 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N NN N N W NN N N N N N N N N NNN 0) -. -‘ 0) 0) (p J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J Minimum Zone Junction N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 66666660666666666666666666666666666666 00000000000000000000000000000000000000 Minimum System Pressure (Psi) N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N) O O W O O O W W W W co W co W W CJ co co G1 co W co co W O W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 6'066666 (n in 66666 666666666 666666666666666 O 0 N O O O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O N O O 0 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 0 O -0Cn N -0 N N 7 (7 N (n -. 3 c ..7-,c OC (D , 3 3 0 d 5<(.3 555<<<< < < < < < <<5< < < < x < < `; < < < < < < < < < A A A, A A A A A A A A A A A A A AAAA A A A r A A A A A A AAA A A A A 0 0 7 ^•N 3 333 MOld 2..1!d VJ 0 CD mk 2 mr U C G 0 Dm 1U ° N(a fn C,) (.7 C 0 QUI `spoyiaW pe;saeH O W • o(fl - S y 0 (D (D 1 0 a a ca. m 7 2 C o ...{n co 0) v 0 (n C (n D 9991.-9SL-£OZ-L+ '0 0 (0 0 m a co Dm D. or, -09,( 0) 07. (0 0 (0 v, 0 0) W 0 -0 -0 -,0r- 13 !�! -0 10 -0 '0 -0 -0 -0 '0 -0 -0 13 m 'U '0 -0 -0 -0 '0 "0 '0 -0 -0 -0 0 "D -0 -0 -0 1D -0 'D 7 7 - 7 7 -0 -0 "0 -0 -0 'D Ix A .1P -1). .A. A ix Ix Ix 0) W W W co W co W W W N N N N N IV N N N N LLL L. ( J D 00 0) (T A W N S CO V CO 0 A W N -+ 0 CO Co V 0) 0) A W N -• 0 CO W V 0) co A W N— O CO Co V 0) Cr, A W N— O (D 0• (D -, N -x -- N N O 0 V 0) (n co A 0 A W N m W W --, (D 01 CA A© N W A CO C7) N A A W W N (O W 0) A Co W O CD O) CD j (0 A O V CO Co A Co (--0 0) N 0 CD 0 0) N O A. 0) 1. W-, Co N A -, W A V A A 0) 0) A 0 0) CO CO W Oo N -+ Co 0 t0 -4 N N 0 0 CD 0) Co 0 O 0) -4 A s V W (n 0 O A A Cr Ch CO _ N O W A W W CD V W -4 N N V 0) W Co 0) 0 r 7 [O = O O CO Co CO O O CO CO CO CO CO W CO OD 03 CO CO CO CO CO CO Co CO W Co CO W CO O O O O CO CO O Co CO N OD CO CO CO (n CO CO Co Co 666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666 Diameter Material (in) "O 1:1 -0 73 0 -0 -0 "0 0 -0 o -0 "0 -0 -0 -0 -0 0 -0 -0 0 "0 -0 -0 "0 "0 -0 -0 0 0 -0 -0 -0 -0 c 0 '0 "0 -0 -0 -0 -0 0 0 -O "0 "0 < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 cn cn cn to (n cr. in is, to cn to 01 to (n (n (n n (n to n (n (n (n (n cn to (n to (n (n v) (n to in (n (n (n v) (n (n (n in 0000000000000000000000p00 o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (n (n cn cn 0) n o o o o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O of m (3n d 0) n m" (u m m a) n 0) N m m 0) m m v m N 0) N C N m 0) psi N m m Di m 0) m m m m m a m m 0) (n N (n N C Cn (n N (n (n (n N CO (0 (n (n (n (n (n (0 (0 (n 0 (0 (n (n (n (0 (n (n (0 (0 (n (n (n (n (n (n (n N (n CO CD CD CD CD O CD(1) (D (D CD CD 0 CD CD (D CD CD (D CD CD CD (D CD CD CD 0 CD CD CD CD CD (D CD CD CD () CD CD CD CD N CD d m m m a) m CO 0(0 (n CO (n (71 CD (D CD CD CD 0 n<) C7 < CD CD 0 J w. O O O O O o 0 0 o O O o O O O O O O O o O O O O O O O O O o o o o O o o o o o o o o O o o o O O 666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666 000000000000006000000000000600000000000000060006 Minor Loss Coefficient 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 '0 -0 U -0 7:1 -0 '0 '0 U 0 '0 -0 0 0 -o ' -O 0 1 0 -0 -o -0 0 '0 0 -0 10 -0 -0 0 0 -0 a v -0 0 -0 0 0 0 '0 -O "0 0 0 -0 -0 'O CD (D () (D (D 0 CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD @ CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD () (D (D CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD (D (D 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 w0 (J) 7 C ^� 0) O (.30 J). 0) J (7) -- - �.. V V O o U) W V 0 W A j 0) Oo J — )) (7) (0 N co CO 0) N V V 0) 0) V J -` A (P 0 (I) N O -� W CP V Cr W 0 (0 0) 0) CO (D A W W 0) 0 W 0) W N 0 A �� W 0 C7) Ja A O) 0 0 (o m O U 3a) "(o CD � i V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V W W _W 0) W W W N W W N N— — _a N— W CJ _a N -N3-4 -4-sW W W N W N W W OD 0) W _a A 1 1 A A CO W W A W W-, -4 W A Co A CO Co Co Co Co Co -+ -+ -+ A-. A .- -. W W W W W W W W W W W CA 0) CO Co Co m Co OD W W Co Q) Co W O) CO Co Co Co Co W W W 0) W 0) W W W CO W CO CD W N CD A CO N CO V 0 no b3 ba W 0 (D (O CD A 01 -4 CO (0 OD W V CO O0) (D 01 0 0 O (O CO A iv iv io N fD -4 O (WO W O A io N no 01 V V V V V V -c-4-4 N W W W W W A Co Co Co Co CO 0) 0) 0 CO (0 0 Co Upstream Structure Hydraulic Grade (ft) V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V W0) 0) 0) W W W N W W IJ 0J--..0) W _, IV N 4, W W W -• -4 -c-, -� IV W N W W W W W -+ -a A -c A. A W W 0) A W W— -4 W A W A W W W W W W .... -c-4 A-, A .c -4 -+ W W W W W CO W W 0) W W O) 0) CO Co 0) 0) CD Co W W W (3) CD (3) Co Co Co O) CO O W W co O) W 0) W W A W W O) W Co 0) Oo 00 (O Co Co Co CO Co W Co W A 0) N N 0) V W N W no W W W W W N (O O (O O) 0) (b W (D O (D no W (0 0) N N 0 s CA V -s-c O O O V 0 O O C0 Cb O CD M (D 0) (T O O O O A A N V O -c -4 O N -4 O) V V V V V V -. -+ .... _, IJ 0) CO C..) W W A 0) co OD CD CO O) W W N N W 'Co Q( O (O 0 V V Downstream Structure Hydraulic Grade (ft) O O o O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O o O O O O O o O O O O O O O o O O o O O O O O O O o O O 6.66666666666666666L66666666666666666666666666666 N O 0 A U) N A. N— 0 0 0— A A N o 0 O W N— 0 0 0 O) 0 0 -' 0 -, N N 0 0 0 0 0 0) 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 V 0 Pressure Pipe Headloss (ft) O O O O O O O O O O o O O o O O O O O O O O O O O O o o O O O O O o O o O O o o O O N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -+ N O 0 O 0) 00 0- 0 --.. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -' O 0) 7) N 01 --i O W 0) A 0 0 0 0 0) O O O O O O O O O 0 C) O O O O O -+ O O W O Headloss Gradient (ft/1000ft) �.�.//G,NEErY/✓G SEWAGE DISPOSAL REPORT FOR LAKE SPRINGS PALM D. GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO HCE JOB NO. 2021003.54 September 3, 2002 PREPARED FOR: Berkeley Family Limited Partnership 3961 County Road 114 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 PREPARED BY: High Country Engineering, Inc. 1517 Blake Avenue, Ste. 101 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 (970) 945-8676 HCE JOB NO. 2021003.54 September 3, 2002 1517 Blake Avenue, Suite 101 14 Inverness Drive East Suite D-136 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Englewood, CO 80112 ^ ^^ TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION GENERAL LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION SANITARY SEWER DESIGN SUMMARY FIGURES: 1) Vicinity Map (81/2" x 11") 2) Road Plan & Profile w/ Utilities Sheets (11" x 17") 3) Master Utility Sheets (11" x 17") APPENDIX: Calculations PAGE 1 1 1 GENERAL LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION The proposed residential development for the Lake Springs PUD is located around the intersection of Springs Valley Road and County Road 114 in Garfield County, Colorado. The proposed residential development consists of 194 single-family residential lots and 4 multi -family residential parcels situated on approximately 441.6 acres. See the enclosed Vicinity Map for site location. SANITARY SEWER DESIGN Sewage disposal will be provided by the Spring Valley Sanitation District. Sewage will be collected via an on-site collection system that will tie directly into an existing sewer main that was recently extended through the proposed development by others. The on- site collection system will utilize central gravity flow with several low-pressure sewer system branches. In the proposed low-pressure sewer system, each residence will have its own `E/one' grinder pump station that reduces all forms of sanitary waste to a non - clogging slurry. The waste is then pumped through a small diameter pressure pipe to the existing or proposed gravity system. The pressure pipe is located just below frost depth versus a gravity pipe up to 20 -feet deep. Since each pump on the system is located at a different point along the low pressure main, and at various elevations, the pumps are designed to work both individually and in unison with the other pumps to complete the passing of the waste to the gravity system. Since each pump's running time is short and power consumption is very low, a long pump life is ensured. In fact studies have shown that typical annual energy consumption equals a 40 -watt light bulb. The units are virtually maintenance free, and typically run eight to ten years between service calls. In the event of a power outage, the pump station is designed to hold the waste until power is resumed, and each pump station also has its own indoor & outdoor alarm system to notify the user of any potential problem. Low-pressure sewer systems have been in production for over 25 years and are already in use in the neighboring Elk Springs Subdivision. A copy of the Spring Valley Sanitation District 'can and will serve' letter has been attached. A computation of County Road 114 sewer main maximum peak flow applied at a minimum slope of 2.0 % show that the proposed 8" plastic sewer pipe would be sufficient to meet on-site demands. See the Appendix for calculations. SUMMARY The Sewage Disposal Report for the Lake Springs PUD acknowledges the existing Spring Valley Sanitation disposal main and has been designed to supply the subdivision with adequate sewage disposal. Figures UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY HIGH COUNTRY 1517 BLAKE AVENUE, surrE Jai GU8W000 SMNGS, CO Pl-{.(970) 945-8676 FX(970) 945-2555 ENGINEERING, INC. 14 NVERNESS DANE EAST, SUITE D136 81601 ENGLEVVOCO, CO 80112 PH(303) 925-0554 FX.(303) 925-0547 GARRELD COUNTY, CO LAKE SPRINGS P.UD. VICINITY MAP SCALE:1"= 2000' Ti DWG DES. DJW CK: DR. DJW DATE: 4/5/02 FILE NO. 2021003.54 SHEET Appendix �COUNTi? Project LP -KE E PRz7J6 Job. No Zd2.Ioo35>y By 0-7W Date q5k7--- Ck'd by Date Subject Page of • Nuol,sek. dp- Umr-n C sF— 19-t 144 F = I (.p i .---,-A- 42) �' 4SSVrne- 3 , 5 pc ,s 7Svc 3 ,o Pen- 500 /I sF /Of va " D > % 6E t ot2 bN r- FAcrok c /D4 y * 2 m TSL so_L :1) = laAciG"TRp/4e10v 6eWE7Z_ 290 0Ac It'.LJ1H-LOu7 (L 257c, vitb 6Qj4VS711 oi= T6 -flu.) oew _ . DeS Al = (/9/)(3(75.2)-1- = 20 f , (P2-5 0, 3(2.,_c. --C$ 0p t To -r k_ az(a)_ = N` O.. 1. Spm CRAM S xynre M int • =tyro /wmza of 0,144 ® PeVe[.oPe"D 5P. _ /zo ✓1/ /2 Ikel3 '=' @a(i A --c) - /2.6 AG)) (10 ZS) _ /65 AG ' s � pes = 02_07,-/z)(346)(75)6) O 93 c --f5 +5x(,25)066) /` lam. V 1P57' tY1'2'r- s IB J Pn.s.se J /21 C? N(N S r>-1 b F WA"1 t 1+45 cz,p. is = Z, o: GLENW00D SPRINGS, CO 923 Cooper Ave. • Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 (970) 945-8676 • (970) 945-2555 fax ENGLEWOOD, CO 14 Inverness Drive East, Suite 13-136 • Englewood, CO 80112 (303) 925-0544 • (303) 925-0547 fax GRAND JUNCTION, CO (970) 858-0935 (970) 858-0775 fax Sewer.txt Lake Springs PUD 2021003.54 Sewer Design Flow at Minimum Slope Manning Pipe Calculator Given Input Data: Shape Solving for Diameter Flowrate Slope Manning's n Computed Results: Depth Area wetted Area Wetted Perimeter Perimeter Velocity Hydraulic Radius Percent Full Full flow Flowrate Full flow velocity Critical Information Critical depth Critical slope Critical velocity Critical area Critical perimeter Critical hydraulic radius Critical top width Specific energy Minimum energy Froude number Flow condition Circular Depth of Flow 8.0000 in 0.1930 cfs 0.0200 ft/ft 0.0130 1.8154 in 0.3491 ft2 0.0595 ft2 7.9442 in 25.1327 in 3.2436 fps 1.0786 in 22.6919 1.7090 cfs 4.8958 fps 2.4216 in 0.0064 ft/ft 2.1642 fps 0.0892 ft2 9.3214 in 1.3776 in 7.3508 in 0.3148 ft 0.3027 ft 1.7519 Supercritical Page 1 Environment One Corporation Pressure Sewer Preliminary Cost and Design Analysis For Lake Springs, PUD: Phase 1 Lake Springs Drive Prepared For: Berkeley Family Limited Partnership 3961 County Road 114 Glenwood Springs CO 81601 Tel: (970) 945-5432 Fax: Prepared By:Deric Walter, EI August 27, 2002 Lake Springs, PUD: Phase 1 Lake Springs Drive Prepared by : Deric Walter, EI On: August 27, 2002 Notes : Lake Springs, PUD 2021003.54 3/11/02 Revised 8/27/02 ««< END OF NOTES »»> August 27, 2002 W G:1 133 cd 0.174 a CI Minimum Static Total Pump Head I Dynamic Elevation (Feet) Head (ft) Dr inside roughness l 150 � [� N (V 0 0 ,-' to O 00 0, to N ,0 to vi 00 S 00 ,C M O O to i O O O O --, 00 N t t O O - N--4 O O t - 7,100.00 7,096.00 7,083.00 7,034.00 0 O 00 M O S Accumulated Max Main Friction Loss Elevation (Feet) O O O O O O O O to t/� ) t ttntntntn 0 0 0 0 NN N N O O t ten 0 N 107.27 106.10 103.98 64.56 e- 00 0, ^-- Friction Loss Friction Loss Factor this Zone (ft/100ft) 1PVC Friction loss calculati 1.17 2.11 39.42 44.69 - 0, 1.17 4.23 8.96 2.63 t- 01 M Pipe Max Length of Size Velocity Main this (Inches)', (FPS) Zone 100.00 50.00 440.00 1,700.00 00 o.- 0, O O o co N 4 ,C M 0 co 4 to N .-- O O ,-. 22.00 1.25 33.00 1.25 44.00 2.00 O O N O O to to .-- N M tr) x3�u cc ES y 0 Ci. a. U fleet was calculated using pipe diameters for: SDR21 00000 0 — 0 0 0 0• — — .- .-; P'Sm 8 U -a8 U^ 0, 350.00 350.00 350.00 350.00 350.00 •y Q UV 0 Q8N .-i N 01 00 N E U ° N , a .__ 3 ti)O E `o 0 N 0 0 0 0 O O O O M 4 to tri Zone Number 1 1.61 010 0 '0 O}O 0 0 N len 4 tri Note: This analysis is valid only with the use of progressive cavity type grinder pumps as manufactured by Environment One. August 27, 2002 Average Retention Accumulated Time (Hr) Retention Time (Hr) pe diameters for: SDR2IPVC CO 'n N v, O, — 0 00 .-+ 01 ,-- N O 301 0.31 NIN O O r-+ o Average Fluid Changes per Day co b 00 M Vii O\}Q� m H 00 Average Daily Flo 0 0 0 0 0 kr) 0 kr) 0 0 m N M C M \O 00 Capacity of Zone I N M N 01 4 O d O N en0 3 C\ Length of Zone O 440.00 1,700.00 O 0 r. 0 kr) Existing Pipe Size Gallons per 100 Lineal Feet I . — -+ .4-00 r. o 00 0 0 0 ON OT ON 00 00 N ,.. N r.. 1.25 2.00 2.00 Accumulated Total of Cores this Zone culated using pi — N O\ 18 24 Pumps to Zone O 0 O'OIO O O O OO N cn 4 vilvi r: ko 0 0 0 0 '0- , a000010 O mgr•NM,d':V'i r Ni Z I Note: This analysis is valid only with the use of progressive cavity type grinder pumps as manufactured by Environment One Valves Pumps Piping Other Budgetary Low Pressure Sewer System Costs Lake Springs, PUD: Phase 1 Lake Springs Drive Quantity Description August 27, 2002 Unit Cost Sub Total 2 1.25" Isolation Valve $500.00 $1,000.00 24 Redundant Check Valve $200.00 $4,800.00 24 Corp Stop $800.00 $19,200.00 2 AirNacuum Release Valve $3,500.00 $7,000.00 2 Clean Out $2,800.00 $5,600.00 6 2.00" Isolation Valve $600.00 $3,600.00 24 Lateral Kits $800.00 $19,200.00 24 1.25" Pipe Laterals $0.00 $0.00 24 Pump/Panel Installation $1,500.00 $36,000.00 24 2010-93 $2,927.00 $70,248.00 590 1.25" Pipe $18.00 $10,620.00 2,200 2.00" Pipe $20.00 $44,000.00 10 Contingencies $22,126.80 $22,126.80 Total Per Home $9,219.50 Total Without Other »»»»»»»> Grand Total Per Home $10,141.45 Total Including Other »»»»»»» $221,268.00 $243,394.80 Note: The System Costs above are based on piping sized for, and Grinder Pumps manufactured by Environment One Corporation. Page 1 SEWER SYSTEMS Environment One Corporation Pressure Sewer Preliminary Cost and Design Analysis For Lake Springs, PUD: Phase 1 Van Cleve Lane Prepared For: Berkeley Family Limited Partnership 3961 County Road 114 Glenwood Springs CO 81601 Tel: (970) 945-5432 Fax: Prepared By:Deric Walter, EI August 27, 2002 Lake Springs, PUD: Phase 1 Van Cleve Lane Prepared by : Deric Walter, EI On: August 27, 2002 Notes : Lake Springs, PUD 2021003.54 3/12/02 Revised 8/26/02 ««< END OF NOTES »»> August 27, 2002 > N ZCd 3 CC U S O N O1 VO 1O c:JVD VD N M tn O O O O O O 0 O l�t"-:M o0 0 0 0 0 O O O O 01 01 O\ ct .--- — 01 O N: r NiN 0 0 O O Ni Ni r. r. N N ":Y N VI N N 01 M CO vl N '0 N 0 N N v) N N M 01 o O o vi d' N N. N C\ N –. V o0 v) 0 0 0 0 N 4 1O 00 v) kin 'r v1 N Cl N Cl 0 0 0 0 O O O O N M d• N M .7 . -- N M •ct g 5 a 'cii O 0 0 0 0 O 0 o O r..-... — 0 0 0 0 O 0 cn M M •--� M Cr, .-. .-. N %.0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O S CO G. Oi ''�1..00,00 iIi E, 0100 O o E a 10 : t• 00 Orn N = 9h Z = at 0 Note: This analysis is valid only with the use of progressive cavity type grinder pumps as manufactured by Environment One. August 27, 2002 Average Retention Accumulated Time (Hr) Retention Time (Hr) DR21 PVC J N ,-. .-. 0.74 —' st O O — O 63.801 0.38 71.771 0.33 --+ M O O ^- O Average Fluid Changes per Day a kr) ko CN N N Capacity of Zone Average Daily Flow 350 O in 0 .-. 3,150 3,850 01 ,r) m 4 - Tr .kri — Length of Zone 60.00 160.00 450.00 170.00 Gallons per 100 Lineal Feet a�aa Existing Pipe Size pe diameters for: S N N 1.25 1.25 Pumps to Accumulated Zone Total of Cores this Zone sheet was calculated using pi 700 1=1 .._800' 9.00 9 9.00_..—.,`4�= 11 Note: This analysis is valid only with the use of progressive cavity type grinder pumps as manufactured by Environment One Valves Pumps Piping Other Budgetary Low Pressure Sewer System Costs Lake Springs, PUD: Phase 1 Van Cleve Lane Quantity Description August 27, 2002 Unit Cost Sub Total 3 1.25" Isolation Valve $500.00 $1,500.00 11 Redundant Check Valve $200.00 $2,200.00 11 Corp Stop $800.00 $8,800.00 1 Clean Out $2,800.00 $2,800.00 11 Lateral Kits $800.00 $8,800.00 11 1.25" Pipe Laterals $0.00 $0.00 11 Pump/Panel Installation $1,500.00 $16,500.00 11 2010-93 $2,927.00 $32,197.00 840 1.25" Pipe $18.00 I $15,120.00 J $15,120.00 10 1 Contingencies $8,791.70 $8,791.70 Total Per Home $7,992.45 Total Without Other »»»»»»»> Grand Total Per Home $8,791.70 Total Including Other »»»»»»» $87,917.00 $96,708.70 Note: The System Costs above are based on piping sized for, and Grinder Pumps manufactured by Environment One Corporation. Page 1 Environment One Corporation Pressure Sewer Preliminary Cost and Design Analysis For Lake Springs, PUD: Phase 2 High Alpine Drive Prepared For: Berkeley Family Limited Partnership 3961 County Road 114 Glenwood Springs CO 81601 Tel: (970) 945-5432 Fax: Prepared By:Deric Walter, EI August 27, 2002 Lake Springs, PUD: Phase 2 High Alpine Drive Prepared by : Deric Walter, EI On: August 27, 2002 Notes : Lake Springs, PUD 2021003.54 3/12/02 Revised 8/27/02 ««< END OF NOTES »»> August 27, 2002 Static Total Head Dynamic (Feet) Head (ft) N inside roughness 150 vO r. N 00 .-. N N 135.83 118.39 118.04 113.93 Vi 01 Cs et M 00 N N VD 0 0 kr; 1 0 0 "cf N 0 0 0 0 d• .-+ v1I.M 0 0 r~ 0 0 N 0 0 — M 0 0 M 0 0 v1 N = 0,•0_ E E is ' o> EL 7,234.00 O O M M N N O O O O c4i O O N N C` Cs O O O O N l: O O r. 01 .. C; O O O CT 4-4 N O O N ^+ C` O O 4 M 4-4 N Accumulated Max Main Friction Loss Elevation (Feet) 0 0 01 v1 r. 0 0 0 0 01 01 on on r.4 r. 0 0 CT on r. 0 0 01 vl .-. 0 0 0' V1 r. r 0 0 C on .-. 0 0 01 v1 * 0 0 0\ V1 .. VD rn0•00 C-0 000 O CT 159.39 O on 0; vi ted' 103.95 83.34 N v Length of Friction Loss Friction Loss Main this Factor this Zone Zone (ft/l00f4) ,PVC Friction Toss calculate � O 6.34 43.90 0.35 r--, tri CN M NN rrVD 20.61 N. ,r,r N .. Cs .-. —+ M N ‘ch VO 01 00 P .-r T4 -4V'1 M CAVO N N r. 01 00 Cs 01 M N V1 h 40.00 150.00 490.00 30.00 310.00 410.00 230.001 O o VDVI 0 �r 740.00 y • v 0, o °^ ei T.;[4. > O O N d' O vi, O O O N 4 00 O k.6 00 V' 00 Lri w n n b.. col C v') vl N N r. .--i v1 N vl v1 v1 N N N h N O O C O O N 0 Cc7 0 0 0 0 '4-4 N .-� N 0 0 M* M— 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 4 N ct 0 0 M M 0O 0 O v1 1r VD 0 4 N M r-4 N d' M. on x 3 L E' i w a U ing pipe diameters for: SDR2 0 0000000 0 0 r•r~ r. r. 0 0 0 0 00'00 r~ r~ �1 o C U la C7 R. 0 0 0 Oo 0 0 M M M 350.00_' 350.00 350.00 350.00 0 C M 0 O M E •^ U ^ V y o 0 V r+ M 01 .-• M vl r-4 V' O M 00 M `c avN o 0 E ,v zo•5 °) U U 3 a) kD . N M 00 r O H C n o a O O O O O O -+ N kin 14.00 15.00 17.00 O O t� O O o0 O O 00 c N z ^ M ti o , o. . 10.00 1 12.00'. 13.00 1 14.00 —15.60 0:0 O O [-Z 0 O 00 Note: This analysis is valid only with the use of progressive cavity type grinder pumps as manufactured by Environment One. August 27, 2002 Cr) V] i." Ccl U Q Q N caN v C� F LL G • atap 4 x CA t� C/) L:r Total Dynamic Head (ft) for inside roughness 150 "-- N .-r N N .--. 135.83 118.39 118.04 en aa M ---, .-" N N 86.34 N 1O L A V7 = 0 co t 0 co t 0 0 0 co co co 1 i 1 0 co 1 0 O 0 co M 0 co N . E c C p„, E E n 0- t LT O O - M N N 17,233.00 7,213.00 7,200.00 7,200.00 7,191.00 O O O a, CZ O O �O vn S 17,134.00 Max Main Elevation heet was calculated using pipe diameters for: SDR2IPVC Friction loss calculations were based on a Constant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C\ a, c:, cri C\ oi 1( V1 V) V) V1 Ul r.. .-a .-r ., .--i 11 t.r"'r"r"t':t:t-rr"t" 0 0 Q\ V) — 0 0 C\ 41 .-. 0 0 Ci h .-" Accumulated Friction Loss (Feet) 0.47 196.65 6.34 196.18 43.90 189.83 0.35 159.39 13.11 159.04 62.59 145.93 V1 a M 0 .-" — vO N 1 42.1211 83.34 41.221 41.22 Friction Loss this Zone Friction Loss Factor (ft/100ft) 1.171 4.23 8.96 1.17 ---- 4.23 15.27 VO'r o, C\ 00 ; M r v1 V) Length of Main this Zone 40.00 150.00 490.00 30.00 310.00 410.00 230.00 1,060.00 740.00 ."' � y• 43 V1 3 ° ;LI. O ,. ,. O •-. N co co co co co co N 4 v6 N 4 06 -. '.O co 00 tC 4 4 00 vi y 0. iiD a 10, 41 V1 V1 V1 V) V) N N N N N N .-" .-r .-. .--i .-. r: V1 O N O .- • N O O N 0 .-, [n. X g C7 0 0 0 0 0 1.0 co co co co O'O —, N M —. fV 4 •--- N M ,. N 4 0 0 O co M V1 M Vl 0 O O VD .-. N M •--- N d Il M If O co OO .-, -4 .-" .-" '.O O O - .r 0 0 010 O O V),V) on on 0 O O V'1 M 1 3 91 3 15 d- O M 00 M 00'0 r , . 00 .--. 00 — 11 X10 CD 010 1'2I!0 O 0 c -D 1 E 0— c r)1 N Z 'F. m O O 06,0 0 C O OIO 4 v-; '.O r 00 Note: This analysis is valid only with the use of progressive cavity type grinder pumps as manufactured by Environment One. August 27, 2002 Accumulated Retention Time (Hr) R21PVC O, S ,-. M ti") .-, N N .--a N 1. .-. M )/1 •--- 00 00 0 N O "'" ---- N O )A N O Gallons per 100 Length of Zone Capacity of Zone Average Daily Flow Average Fluid Average Retention Lineal Feet Changes per Day Time (Hr) %r1,.. N r1 o'o M O o, ,--, 1v 10 O N O 1/40V, M O 0.46 N O sk/ t!1 ON ) 6 S. 70.31 E 127.60 37.04 140.05 h 6 l0 v - N V1 95.39 'I_ M 0 v1 cos .-. 0 v1 .-, M,--, 0 v-) M 0 0 ,!1 cn O N V1 0 o 'd- '-+ 0 o tin O 0 0 C",1 M \O s.o M ,-. t— .M-. 0 00 4 7 t� N r 01 M er. oe)i N cn M O N M t- r. 139.43 40.001 0 0 ,-. 490.000 0 006 310.00 410.00 230..00 0 o I I 740.00 0110\ Orn o\ 0\ 6 a\ o0 18.84 Existing Pipe Size pe diameters for: SD 1 N — +n N ,- , v1' l N N ,-. —. vi;cn N N — ,--, cn N , -: 2.00 o co N Accumulated Total of Cores this Zone culated using pi r. cn 00 •--+ M V1 .-4 30 38 Pumps to Zone 0 cA 3 0 0 O O ^ cv 0 0 O O v,, 4 0 0 O O v, t` 0 O t--:.00 0 0 0 0 00 Cr C , z lis spread 10.00 11.00 12.00 ; 13.00 14.00 15.00 16.00 17.00 18.00 Note: This analysis is valid only with the use of progressive cavity type grinder pumps as manufactured by Environment One Valves Pumps Piping Other Budgetary Low Pressure Sewer System Costs Lake Springs, PUD: Phase 2 High Alpine Drive Quantity Description August 27, 2002 Unit Cost Sub Total 6 1.25" Isolation Valve $500.00 $3,000.00 38 Redundant Check Valve $200.00 $7,600.00 38 Corp Stop $800.00 $30,400.00 1 AirNacuum Release Valve $3,500.00 $3,500.00 4 Clean Out $2,800.00 $11,200.00 6 2.00" Isolation Valve $600.00 $3,600.00 $59,300.00 38 Lateral Kits $800.00 $30,400.00 38 1.25" Pipe Laterals $0.00 $0.00 38 Pump/Panel Installation $1,500.00 $57,000.00 38 2010-93 $2,927.00 $111,226.00 $198,626.00 1,660 1.25" Pipe $18.00 $29,880.00 1,800 2.00" Pipe $20.00 $36,000.00 $65,880.00 10 Contingencies $32,380.60 $32,380.60 Total Per Home $8,521.21 Total Without Other »»»»»»»> Grand Total Per Home $9,373.33 Total Including Other »»»»»»» $323,806.00 $356,186.60 Note: The System Costs above are based on piping sized for, and Grinder Pumps manufactured by Environment One Corporation. Page 1 SEWER. SYSTEMS Environment One Corporation Pressure Sewer Preliminary Cost and Design Analysis For Lake Springs, PUD: Phase 2 High Alpine Circle Prepared For: Berkeley Family Limited Partnership 3961 County Road 114 Glenwood Springs CO 81601 Tel: (970) 945-5432 Fax: Prepared By:Deric Walter, EI August 27, 2002 Lake Springs, PUD: Phase 2 High Alpine Circle Prepared by : Deric Walter, EI On: August 27, 2002 Notes : Lake Springs, PUD 2021003.54 3/12/02 Revised 8/27/02 ««< END OF NOTES »»> O O N N N Q Total Dynamic Head (ft) 'r vi '-+ O'+ \O N h ,4 N 1 Kos vO o0 O C\ N O O N rt' O O 4 ,t' O O M N O O N 17,--O y�0 v 0 cn x c = p,.0 E E is c ill or inside rot 1 00'LZT'L 7,114.00 O O N -. r..-. nnn O O r1 cn O O 4 v1 „ Max Main li Elevation 0 O un .-, 0 O yr r..-. 0 O o 41 0 O 01 r. 0 O b v1 ..- Accumulated Friction Loss (Feet) 00 00 00 00 N r- 27.001 N Friction Loss this Zone ,O C.: --. ,. vD N co ... 0 tin 4 N O N VD r- 0 r+ N 4 8.96 2.63 CT M Friction Loss Factor (ft/100ft) Length of Main this Zone 0 o 180.001 560.00 770.00 170.00 Max Flow Pipe Max (GPM) Size Velocity (Inches) (FPS) 0 N 0 V' 0 0000 .0 M c1' 'r N — vl N -., v1 O N O -. N O O N O 0 ^- . O 0 N N O O 0 0 cn d M O 0 v1 0n 5 n ... N on V' to E RE.6 i g! CD 0 r.. CD CD CD 0 0 0 .-. ". ". CD 0 ,-. m `.. 0 2c� m I- C7 8. liameters foi 350.00 000 o00 vtv'141 01 M M 350.00 -, 01 O, 00 r.. O N E - = ti C Q a ` - EUN o's it a, N O ac N C.. heet was ca 20.00 21.00 22.00 23.00 0 N c a o7 Z us spreads 19.00 20.00 O'O!0 o'o,CD '-4. N r1 NIN',N Note: This analysis is valid only with the use of progressive cavity type grinder pumps as manufactured by Environment One. O N N DA u w F-' 0 z w E� A � N Q Q vi a 0. 5.9 C./11) C/7 rte. r -a Accumulated Retention Time (Hr) 2.37 1.43 v't O r. 'O %.O O —, .-. O Average Fluid Average Retention Changes per Day Time (Hr) r. O\ O 00 M O O., M O in in O .-- O ;ON V1. N N 00 c VO N ti N f'j ct 218.53 verage Daily Flo 0 0 kr, in M O — 0 in M 0 0 M 0 0 O r Capacity of Zone — k.D l� ct M vO ,--. — O N -+ ir 145.09 32.03 Length of Zone O O O O 0 O in 00 O O O U1 O O O N lam- I O O O l ---- Existing Pipe Size Gallons per 100 Lineal Feet •,:Fd 01 01 — 01 d' 00 00 ,:t.- 00 00 pe diameters for: SD 1.25 1.25 in N ,-+ 0 O CV O O (V Accumulated Total of Cores this Zone culated using pi 3 Cr, 00 "., 0 N o i E• N0 = 0. c))O O yi1O •,,O 31 ON SIN C y. O O O O N N I O O N A 010 00 M0 0 0 0 i v 28, aiG,0 ^ N iM 0= y'.� NNN Z 0 0 N Valves Pumps Piping Other Budgetary Low Pressure Sewer System Costs Lake Springs, PUD: Phase 2 High Alpine Circle Quantity Description August 27, 2002 Unit Cost Sub Total 3 1.25" Isolation Valve $500.00 $1,500.00 20 Redundant Check Valve $200.00 $4,000.00 20 Corp Stop $800.00 $16,000.00 1 AirNacuum Release Valve $3,500.00 $3,500.00 2 Clean Out $2,800.00 $5,600.00 3 2.00" Isolation Valve $600.00 $1,800.00 Q`27 Ann Aft 20 Lateral Kits $800.00 $16,000.00 20 1.25" Pipe Laterals $0.00 $0.00 20 Pump/Panel Installation $1,500.00 $30,000.00 20 2010-93 $2,927.00 $58,540.00 e1fA 5AA 00 890 1.25" Pipe 940 2.00" Pipe $18.00 $20.00 $16,020.00 $18,800.00 $34,820.00 10 Contingencies Total Per Home $8,588.00 Grand Total Per Home S9,446.80 Total Without Other »»»»»»»> Total Including Other »»»»»»» $188,936.00 $17,176.00 $17,176.00 $171,760.00 Note: The System Costs above are based on piping sized for, and Grinder Pumps manufactured by Environment One Corporation. Page 1 SEWER. SYSTEMS Environment One Corporation Pressure Sewer Preliminary Cost and Design Analysis For Lake Springs, PUD: Phase 2 Lake Springs Court Prepared For: Berkeley Family Limited Partnership 3961 County Road 114 Glenwood Springs CO 81601 Tel: (970) 945-5432 Fax: Prepared By:Deric Walter, EI August 27, 2002 Lake Springs, PUD: Phase 2 Lake Springs Court Prepared by : Deric Walter, EI On: August 27, 2002 Notes : Lake Springs, PUD 2021003.54 3/12/02 Revised 8/27/02 ««< END OF NOTES »»> August 27, 2002 Total Dynamic Head (ft) [PVC Friction loss calculations were based on a Constant for inside roughness t 150 1 11.00 1.25 2.00 20.00 1.17 0.23 55.64 7,061 00 7,033.00 28.00 83.64 80.40 00 C) 'O +-a Y td 0 S p N 52.86 7,061.0017,037.001 24.00 Max Main Minimum Elevation Pump Elevation 0 O b M 0 0 O .-+ O Accumulated Friction Loss (Feet) 0 to in Friction Loss this Zone to N 52.86 Friction Loss Factor (ft/100ft) 60.001- 4.23 0' 06 0 O 0 in Length of Main this Zone 5 2; v O d O N o. N V a . v 1 22.001 1.25 33.00 1.25 o r. V � a N M a' 0 i pipe diameters for: SDR2 1350.00'11.00 4 350.00 11.00 350.00 11.00 1O e� 7, t- 0 a •= y V 0 O '6 N M O., Pumps to Number Zone of Cores in `Lone J � m •0 2 co U m 2 O O O 3 tn'.O'0 - N N N 0 Zone Number tis spreads) 24.00 25.00 26.00 Note: This analysis is valid only with the use of progressive cavity type grinder pumps as manufactured by Environment One. August 27, 2002 Accumulated Retention Time (Hr) culated using pipe diameters for: SDR2IPVC %.o VD 0 cr ten 0 --- "1- 0 Average Fluid Average Retention Changes per Day Time (Hr) MM-, O O O O O O, - - W 01 — 01 .-, l!1 Length of Zone Capacity of Zone Average Daily Flo 1.25 1 9.141 20.00 1.831 350 1.25 9.14 60.00 [ 5.49 I 1,050 0 ri kri Q, M 0 0 0 Ch tri d' Existing Pipe Size Gallons per 100 Lineal Feet N Accumulated Total of Cores this Zone —+ M O1 O'O 0 O O O r O Puml Zo L sheet \ N N Zone Number tis spread O'O 0 000 N N N Note: This analysis is valid only with the use of progressive cavity type grinder pumps as manufactured by Environment One Valves Pumps Piping Other Budgetary Low Pressure Sewer System Costs Lake Springs, PUD: Phase 2 Lake Springs Court Quantity Description August 27, 2002 Unit Cost Sub Total 3 1.25" Isolation Valve $500.00 $1,500.00 9 Redundant Check Valve $200.00 $1,800.00 9 Corp Stop $800.00 $7,200.00 1 AirNacuum Release Valve $3,500.00 $3,500.00 1 Clean Out $2,800.00 $2,800.00 $16,800.00 9 Lateral Kits $800.00 $7,200.00 9 1.25" Pipe Laterals $0.00 $0.00 9 Pump/Panel Installation $1,500.00 $13,500.00 9 2010-93 $2,927.00 $26,343.00 $47,043.00 670 1.25" Pipe $18.00 $12,060.00 $12,060.00 L 10 Contingencies $7,590.30 $7,590.30 Total Per Home $8,433.67 Total Without Other »»»»»»»> $75,903.00 Grand Total Per Home $9,277.03 Total Including Other »»»»»»» $83,493.30 Note: The System Costs above are based on piping sized for, and Grinder Pumps manufactured by Environment One Corporation. Page 1 SEWER SYSTEMS Environment One Corporation Pressure Sewer Preliminary Cost and Design Analysis For Lake Springs, PUD: Phase 3 Rivendell Road Prepared For: Berkeley Family Limited Partnership 3961 County Road 114 Glenwood Springs CO 81601 Tel: (970) 945-5432 Fax: Prepared By:Deric Walter, EI August 27, 2002 Lake Springs, PUD: Phase 3 Rivendell Road Prepared by : Deric Walter, EI On: August 27, 2002 Notes : Lake Springs, PUD 2021003.54 Phases 3 3/12/01 Revised 8/27/02 ««< END OF NOTES »»> N 0 0 N N N 00 0 Max Main Minimum I Static Total Elevation Pump Head Dynamic Elevation (Feet) Head (ft) M 00 N O O 00 M 35.00 122.54 O, 00 — 00 0 c %.G 15.00 33.28 O co ,ti: M co O 00 N for inside rou 6,964.00 0 O N O, VS 00 O 00 0, 6,974.00 O 00 VD O, a Constant 7,002.00 7,002.00 O O O ti O O N O O O O M o0 0\ Accumulated Friction Loss (Feet) M vt 00 V7 00 00 00 0o 0, 00 N 00 00 1/4,c, 18.28 Max Flow Pipe Max ! Length of Friction Loss Friction Loss (GPM) Size Velocity Main this Factor this Zone (Inches) (FPS) Zone (ft/IOOft) cr in N,:, .-r 4 41.22 23.401 00 N 00 NN .- 4 GST V0 00 N N M 110.00 1 110.00 460.00 890.00 460.00 o, - o, 'o 00, 00o0o Inv1 v'1 O 0 Ns! N O O .-+—. N N 010 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 N M 4 ti N M 4 v) cn O 4 o y a 00000 > 2 0 Q L) cyIn C7 a Iculated using pipe diameters foi 1 1 350.00 00 0 0 00,00 O O O O v) V) I4 M MM M •y c •U j U NO m O,;o0 Nm w 0 = 0 0 E O N z -o .s N Q, v) S o a o E N G. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 CT; c ,-, .-, N N M M M Zone Number us spreads) __ -- 28.0 27.000 29.00 —30.00 IO -- M August 27, 2002 Accumulated Retention Time (Hr) ,e diameters for: SDR2IPVC - •-• in '4" N N O CA. "O N N •-+ •-- 0 0 Average Retention Time (Hr) O'N iO M N N M 0.641 0.26 O O O Average Daily Flo Average Fluid Changes per Day 34.80 104.40 O\ 00 N it 00 00 Ir-: N 4 M O, o 0 0 o O 1.'1 V1 in O in M 0 •-• M 0 ,--i M 00 Capacity of Zone o I1/4o 167.701 - t- o00 o o a *o O O N ..... — 00 Length of Zone 0 0 o 0 0 o 0 0 460.00 — — 4( a0' 00 Existing Pipe Size Gallons per 100 Lineal Feet d.v-1- "4- .1- — .-. oo 00 O•• Oi Oi o i oo v1 v1 v1 0 0 N N ci 0 0 "-- r-. ^-- N r4 1 9 N 0 0 M ,t'O O O 0 "F? s '0Cr: o i—, Nv,'N N N r'1M z Note: This analysis is valid only with the use of progressive cavity type grinder pumps as manufactured by Environment One Valves Pumps Piping Other Budgetary Low Pressure Sewer System Costs Lake Springs, PUD: Phase 3 Rivendell Road Quantity Description August 27, 2002 Unit Cost Sub Total 4 1.25" Isolation Valve $500.00 $2,000.00 23 Redundant Check Valve $200.00 $4,600.00 23 Corp Stop $800.00 $18,400.00 4 Air/Vacuum Release Valve $3,500.00 $14,000.00 1 Clean Out $2,800.00 $2,800.00 4 2.00" Isolation Valve $600.00 $2,400.00 23 Lateral Kits $800.00 $18,400.00 23 1.25" Pipe Laterals $0.00 $0.00 23 Pump/Panel Installation $1,500.00 $34,500.00 23 2010-93 $2,927.00 $67,321.00 680 1.25" Pipe $18.00 $12,240.00 1,350 2.00" Pipe $20.00 $27,000.00 10 Contingencies $20,366.10 $20366.10 Total Per Home $8,854.83 Total Without Other »»»»»»»> Grand Total Per Home $9,740.31 Total Including Other »»»»»»» $203,661.00 $224,027.1.0 Note: The System Costs above are based on piping sized for, and Grinder Pumps manufactured by Environment One Corporation. Page 1 SEWER SYSTEMS Environment One Corporation Pressure Sewer Preliminary Cost and Design Analysis For Lake Springs, PUD: Phases 4-5 Spring Valley Rd/Ct/Dr/Place and Rivendell Ct. Prepared For: Berkeley Family Limited Partnership 3961 County Road 114 Glenwood Springs CO 81601 Tel: (970) 945-5432 Fax: Prepared By:Deric Walter, EI August 27, 2002 Lake Springs, PUD: Phases 4-5 Spring Valley Rd/Ct/Dr/Place and Rivendell Ct. Prepared by : Deric Walter, EI On: August 27, 2002 Notes : Lake Springs, PUD 2021003.54 Phases 4-5 3/12/01 Revised 8/26/02 ««< END OF NOTES »»> August 27, 2002 Total Dynamic Head (ft) 133.40 1 ul O M M , , 130.78 122.54 135.91 cr d: v1 M r-. 124.10 Tr M .--. N ..... V1 O 00 00 00 v1 01 00 CV .-. 00M 00 CN CT 00 84.98 r. In d' 00 N 0.; 01 r- 44.09 — 0 0 00 M 0 0 0 0 00 N M M 0 0 Ti M 0 0 Ti d' 0 0 Ti tet' 0 0 01 M 0 0 N 0 0 O •-, 0 0 N -. 0 ;O 0 '0 01 .-. • . M O O M ' N O O on N O O .-. N O O N ^-- O O N -, Minimum Pump Elevation )r inside rou cc O 00 OT v0 CD O 00 iCD 00O\ ,-- ,, Ch O^ vO vO N N O' v0 0 0 N •-+ 0' v5 0 0 N .• � v> 0 0 N .-. 0 v 0 0 0 O 01 0 0 N v1 O\ ' 0 0 0 v1 CA O 00 0 (n M 0�'C71 vO 0 v1 N '.0 O 0 N N O v0 O 0 N N 0^ vO O 0 04 N CT vO O 0 O M CT 16 O 0 vi N 01 vO 0 O VO v1 o ) cO 0 0 O O '.O VO \O . h v1 . 01 O� v v0 0 v0 v1 CN `0 0 0 vO v1 CA 10 0 0 `.O vn C\ vO 0 0 vO v1 CN '.o 0 0 13 N CN vO 0 0 N VD CN '.o 0 0 N V) CT vO 0 0 d' vl C1 vO 0 0 vO vn 01 '.Ci 0 0 O v1 n vO 0 0 O vl O n vO [6,950.00 6,942.00 O O N d' O s N.0 Accumulated Friction Loss (Feet) O 41 01 v1 00 V1 M 01 O, d' 00 00 • r. -. 01 Tr. T • CN 0 O vi 00 m Tr C- v1 00 N 00 N N N 0' l0 a, N v1 61.98 ^. TT V) S 00 VI 32.09 C1 M r. IM O f N N r+ vi 14.20 I 0.47 M vO N O � 21.35 O 00 .M. V0 20.90 26.88' 18.70 M C"1 Friction Loss Factor (ft/100ft) rs — .-ti N v�'l �' r. 4.23 CCD 00 I T. 4.23 C 00 N" .. N •� N CT 00 N N N .-. •-' Length of Main this Zone 30.00 30.00 340.00 540.00 40.00 0 c vn ..N 120.001 — 40.00] 0 c 180.00 950.00 40.00 - — 300.00 0 o vn 00 0 0 CN ., ^ w 0 Ct. > 0 N 0 V' CO c''1 O N O V O VO M Cr; , . O 0 N- i . . 0 vO 00 O 01 O M N O 4 .-. O vO ao M M vl N r. vl — Cl— O O N v1 Cl -. v1 N r. vl Cl .., O v1 N v1 41 N N , . .-. vl N ,, O v1 CV 41 N r. v1 N - v1 i C`1, r. O v) N O O M Max Flo (GPM) 11.00 22.00 33.00 O O 4 4 O O .-. r" 22.00 O O M M O O v1 vl 11.00 22.00 O 0 M M O 0 VO v0 0 0 .• T. 0 0 N N 0 0 M M 0 0 10 VO 0 0 N N .-� N M ^' CV M VI •-. N M VO ". N M v0 l- x e 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0'0 0 Gal/Day per Core 0 o v1 M 350.00 350.001 0 O In M 350.00 350.001 0 O v1 M 350.00 fl 0 0 O O vl v1 M M 350.001 350.00 0 0 vD M 0 0 v1 M 350.00 350.00 0 O v1 M ing pipe c • T. M 01 M TT M vl S N M V0 C— M ^• M 41 O CV4 y`^ .0 OO E U N z o - E ". I N VD ch ". N N 01 '• N M d' — N N 00 N 0 m o go tom' 33.001 33 00 1 4 00 0 0 0.010 M M 0 I M 0 O a0 M 0 O O1 M 0 O M 0 O •-T �' 0 O N d' O 6,0 M V 0 C- 6,6 O O v1 v6 Tf 47.00 0 0 00 Tr Zone Number its spreads) 32.001 33.00 0 0 0 0 0 000 v1 \. M qn M I 0 0 0 0 0'0 C` 00 01 0 M M M 71' I ��O .O TT d' 1 - 42.00 O O Ti 4 O O v1 d' 46.00, 47.00 0 O 00 7C August 27, 2002 Accumulated Retention Time (Hr) pe diameters for: SDR21PVC N un M O1 M M Cl M 00 M N 3.01 VO is N Vl .Tr N O M N O N N Vl O\ ,... M Vl ,-. Vl M .--, , . �O VO M ,-. .-. ":1- N ,-. �O 00 O, ct' V'? O O 0.06 CN t 'n O O N O M O vl O N CN O 00 N O CV O O1 O CN O vn M O O M O N M O Len O Average Daily Flo Average Fluid Changes per Day 0 vO C-: N oolOo kin M 1,050 j 382.79 l- —. O1 4 ! Vl .-, M 4,550 44.72 350195.70 VO 14-) v6 l- CD Vl O •--i 1,7501 159.50 S ,. V'1 N O b Vl Oh Cl Ch N Vn O O VO M t` OO N Vt 95.70 191.40 63.80 74.59 O1 Vl 4 C7Oo——O V1 O ,-i- O ••.. N V'1 Lr) CA — t^ N .-w 00'L1 o O r N Capacity of Zone 2.74 e{ r- N VD O V) Vl N O ^. VO VO M 13.71 N 0, O1 on O N M V) VD M 0 N CO r... VO d. — N"0 Cl VD N 3.66 5.49 27.43 N VD M N VD VD 0000 et Gallons per 100 Length of Zone Lineal Feet 30.00 A 30.00 340.00 I O O V tinr 40.00 0 O - , 0 0 O O - N -. M 0 O 0 O N 0 O 950.00 O O d' 60.00 300.00 O O 00 O O CN er'et ,. .. O; CT 18.84 et 00 00 *et , . Cr;, cte.0 r. a ... '.O O; N Cy ... O; ,-..-, O; O; 27.60 etvet ,. O; .-. ,. O; O; 1 27.60 40.90 Existing Pipe Size 41 Vl Cl N ,--i ,-. O O N O O N Lin Cl — Vl Cl ,-. Vl Cl .-. O V1 N V) N ,-.1 N Cl .-, 1.25 O 41 N Vl Cl .-. Vl Vl N Cl ,. ,. O Vr) N O O M Accumulated Total of Cores this Zone sheet was calculated using pi ,--, M O O 0 0 M '4 M M O1 O 0 Vi. on: M .. �O 0 O, on O 0 N M M O 0 CO M Vl 43.00.1_n 27 ,. 0 0 ,-. 4 M 0 0 N 4 VO 0 0 M l— M 0 0 b d' ,� 0 0 V1 M Vl 0 0 0 0 vO b �t .1' 0 tin 0 0 00 .t N O 0 00 Pumps to Zone -OO y 2 0 0 a m N M 0 C "^M MM, CD, CD CD:CD d. kr) M O CD. \--D M O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 CD O O 0 0 0 0 0 N 00 . CT 0 N M ''Tr M M.M V 7 CY 7: 7r 0,O CD 'CD 0 O" O O V) 0 ; N ',: CO d' i 7 id i'1' valid only with the use of progressive cavity type grinder pumps as manufactured by Environment One Note: This analysis Valves Pumps Piping Other Budgetary Low Pressure Sewer System Costs Lake Springs, PUD: Phases 4-5 Spring Valley Rd/Ct/Dr/Place and Rivendell Ct. Quantity Description August 27, 2002 Unit Cost Sub Total 3 1.25" Isolation Valve $500.00 $1,500.00 11 2.50" Isolation Valve $600.00 $6,600.00 4 3.00" Isolation Valve $600.00 $2,400.00 62 Redundant Check Valve $200.00 $12,400.00 1 62 Corp Stop $800.00 $49,600.00 9 Air/Vacuum Release Valve $3,500.00 $31,500.00 4 Clean Out $2,800.00 $11,200.00 3 2.00" Isolation Valve $600.00 $1,800.00 62 Lateral Kits $800.00 $49,600.00 62 1.25" Pipe Laterals $0.00 $0.00 62 Pump/Panel Installation $1,500.00 $93,000.00 62 2010-93 $2,927.00 $181,474.00 1,190 1.25" Pipe $18.00 $21,420.00 880 2.00" Pipe $20.00 $17,600.00 3,160 2.50" Pipe $20.50 $64,780.00 1,190 3.00" Pipe $21.00 _$24,990.00 10 Contingencies $56,986.40 $56,986.40 Total Per Home $9,191.35 Total Without Other »»»»»»»> Grand Total Per Home $10,110.49 Total Including Other »»»»»»» $569,864.00 $626,850.40 Note: The System Costs above are based on piping sized for, and Grinder Pumps manufactured by Environment One Corporation. Page 1