Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1.0 ApplicationSCHA'UESEP GO I MEYER INC. December 15, 1989 Mark Bean, DirectorGarfield County Building Planningand Sanitation 1O9 8th Street Gl.enwood Springs, CO ? Grand Avenue, Suite 212 u,_nwood Springs, Colorado 81601 (303)94s-1004 I0610 Re: MitchelL creek project subdivision rmprovementsAqreement, f teU #2 grlork Description Dear Mark: Please let this letter serve as a report discussing the itemsprovided to be performed with the subdivision rilprovementsAgreement by the developer. on December 13, 1g8g, schmueser Gordon Meyer, rnc. performeda fierd investigation to observe the items provided asfollows: 1. Excavation and embankment2. Base course material3. Asphalt paving4. (3) Culverts (drainage and debris flow)5. Riprap debris flow channefs6. Overlot and debris flow grading7. Revegetation. r would like to discuss each item as it appears above. 1. The excavation and embankment for creekside court wasperformed prior to this developers work. Regrading as itreLates to debris flow grading was performed.. 2. Base course material. was instalred (g" deep) as anunderlyingr structural fill for the roadway 3. Paving was performed using chip/seaL over thebase course. 4._Culverts provided for minor drainage wereinlet structures. In addition, debris fLowCreekside Court were installed. installed withswales across 5. Erosion control measures e,vere undertaken in the debrisflow channeLs using Geo web material and cocamat materierL.on the steeper gradients, the Geo web material was utilizedas an alternative to the riprap proposed. on the gentre CO'VSULT'A'G E'VG'NEERS & SUBYEYOPS ,ri"j ;;;-;;;;, "g;i"";"";; Page 2Mitchell Creek project December 15, lg8g al.ternative to the riprap proposed. 6. Debris fLow grading across creekside court wag proposed,and was instalLed as proposed. 7. Revegetation was performed by means of broadcastseeding on the cut slopes of Creikside Court. r hope this informati.on serves its intended purpose.call. with any questions. Respectively Submitted, Please ]monson, dw: 8062 INC. tcPjX;N s. *f,.q GI^CO CORPORAIIOTI " P aving 6 Light.H eavy Construction, P.O. Box 1220 Carbondale, Colorado g1 623 (303) 963_3516 November 20, 1989 Mr. Mark Iddings Difi,ance Limired 3407 South Grand Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Dear Mark: This letter is to eonfirm theSubdivision. 8tt of 3tt road base, tr3g7 4" of 3/4" road base, 739 656 gallons of MC-70 1,804 gallons of RC-SOOR quantities used on the Mitchell Creek tons, graded and eompacted tons, graded and compacted Specif lcati.ons. to 1et me know. 63 tons of 3/4r, cover coat materi.al 34 tons of Type II cover coat material A11 chip seal was completed as per Garfield County If you require further information, donrt hesitate silfterety, ,b,:!'; Vice Prt'idenr JT:js - GIACO CORPORATIOil " P aving 6 Light'H eavy Constr uction" P.O. Box 1220 Carbondale, Colorado 81 623 (303) 963-3s16 November 20r 1989 Mr. Mark Iddings Difiance Limited 3407 South Grand Glenwood Springs, C0 81601 Dear Mark: This letter is to confirm the Subdivision. Bt' of 3tt road base, 11387 4" of 3f4" road base, 739 656 gallons of MC-70 1r804 gallons of RC-800R quantities used on tons, graded and tons, graded and the Mitchell Creek compacted compacted 63 tons of 3/4" cover coat material 34 tons of Type II cover coat material A11 chip seal was eompleted as Per Garfield County Specifications' If you require further information, donft hesitate to let me know. sifterely,ll -4r )1,^ ln t[n terry/ Vice Predident I JT:js GI^CO CORPORATIOTI " P aving E Light-H eavy Constr uction" P.O. Box 1220 Carbondale, Colorado 81 623 (303) 963-3516 June 13, 1989 l{r. Mark Bean Garfiel-d County Pl-anner Garfield County Courthouse Glenwood Spri-ngs, CO 81601 Dear Mark: Re: Mitchel-l Creek Subdivision This is to advise that GMCO Corporation did the following base preparation for the above subdivision on April 20, 1989: B" of 3" Road Base - graded and compaet,ed 4" of 3/4" Road Base - graded and compacted onnation, please let me know.If you St ephenson June 9, 1989 Board of County Commissioncrs 109 8th Street Glenu,ood Springs, CO 81601 Dear Commissioners:G,/-/eO fu1'Cr., Enclosed is a bill from @anffiravel for q9,519.f9 for the purchasing ano instailing the road base for Creekside Court at Mitchell Creek. This is a request to drarv this amount from our account withyou. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely, ., .. .,)\')-- ,.'i',,/)- /r/ "'Ld-b; .<<-'11- - -l' /\ Mark lddings ',. ) January 14, 1988 Board of County Commissionersof Garfield County 109 - Bth Street Glenwood Springs, C0. 81601 Dear Commissioners: Enclosed are letters from Scott Lesl'ie of the West Glenwood Water and Sanitat'ion District certify'ing that the water and sewer lines we in- stalled at l4itchell Creek are'in conformance with their rules and regu 1 ati ons. This'is a request to withdraw from our account our actual expenses which were $16,525.28 plus $1,000.00 for a fire hydrant tap fee. This totals $17,525.28 which is less than the $18,613.90 we budgeted and depos i ted wi th you . The sewer and water lines are complete. Please call me if you have any questions about th'is. Mark Iddings (/(-/ (r )7---fl,w Faye FaaS Sincerely, Ijl)ilcmIili,EIl, lll['' - '"' ""'rlii ht ,o* 14 lerla iy GAfti:i[.r.n' TUUNTY VESTGLEI\WOOD SPRINGS SAI{ITATIOi\ DISTRICT P.O. Box ti66 Glenwurd Sprlngs, Colorado 81604 (303) 945-6o6e Jan. 6 t9e,8 Evergreen Constmction Attn. Mr John Sherman Dear John, Ttris letter is to certify that the sewer line extention in the upper part of Mitchel Creek Subdivision has been inspected and. is in conformance with the Districtfs ftules and Regulatlons. Thts includes the manhore and the laterar lines( senrice connections). rf you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to give me a caII. Resgectfully, Distrlct Les1ie Manager \WEST GLI..IWOOD SPRINGS WATE. . P.O. Box 2171 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81602 (303) e45-061e DISTR!CT Dec. 21, 1987 Evergreen Constnrctlon Attn. l4r. John Sherman Dear John, This letter is to certify that the water rlne extention i.n the upper part of Mitchel Creek Subdivision has been inspected and is in conformance rrlth the Districtrs Bules and Begulations. Thts lncludes the Fire trydrant and ttre servtce connections. There is a $10oo.oo tap fee for the fire hydrant, which should be paid by the developer. If you have any questlons regarding thls matter, please do not hesitate to gi-ve me a cal1. Respectfully, _,$N,WuScott W. Leslle Dlstrict Manager September 15, 1989 Board of County Commissioners Garfield County 109 8th Street Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Dear Sirs: This is a request to amend the plat for Lot 19 of the Mitchell creek Project Filing No. 1. currently the lot is under contract to purchase with James Mason being the purchaser. In order to maintain an approximate 10zo grade on the driveway, Mr. Mason wishes to move the buir;ing enverope approximately 30 feet to the south. By doing this the Masoi,s can avoid doing a switch back in the driveway rvhich u,oulcl actually be further to the south and be a possibie detriment tothe property bordering the south (Lot z0). AIso this rvillprevent scaring the hillside and save a Iot of the natural vegetation. I have visited Bill Kneipper who owns Lot 20 next cloor and hc said he doesn't have a problem with this. I would appreciate your consideration of this request. Sincerely, -(1 Mark Iddings Defiance, Ltd.,&r*re< /aoe-' z/ta/ar I Board of CountY Commissioners Garfield CountY 109 8th Street Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Dear Commissioners: This letter is to inform you of our progress at the Mitchell creek subdivision. Basically we have preformed all of the improvements we were to complete with the exception of some minor drainage work (rip rap) and having the road chip and sealed. we were to have the road chip and sealed in June and are still waiting due to some delays with G.M.C.O. I rvould like to extend our completion date to December 15th with your permission. Sincerely, tu. 'ouL Mark Iddings Defiance, Ltd. /rurrf D17/''-z/'/'r GARFIELD COUNTY COUNTY ATTOR NEY'S OFF ICE 109 8th Street Suite 300 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81 601-3303 Phone 945-9150 March 7, f9BB Defiance, Ltd. 214 Bi:h Street-, Suite 300 Glenwood SPrings, CO 81601 ATTN: t'lark Iddings RE: Mitchell creek P.u.D. subdivision ImproventenLs Agreement- Dear l,1r . Iddings: please consider this leLr:er to be confirmai:ion of t-he fact- t-hat Garfield ;;il; i.=-Eag,s66.35, hetd by t-he Garfield CounLy Treasurer as securir-y r-o guarant-ee t-he complet-ion of subdivision improvement-s associateo wit-h the l4it-chell- creek p.u.n. The subcjivision Improvenents Agreemenl- between Garfield county and Defiance, Lr-d., signed ocLober 30, 1987, recorded on Book 723, pages 744-746, has a provision for parLial reLease of security upon satisfactory .na u.ti-fiabte tompletion of l-he specified tmprovemenr-s' When the Glenwood Springs Electric Syst-em gives you a l-ett-er confirming that the eLectric' seivice is available t-o all of r-he Iots in question, that- letter is then submir:r-ed to the CounLy Planning Departnrent ' along ,itf, u request for part-ial release. The Planning Oepart-menr- will prepare a documenr- acknowleitging part-ia1 release of t-he security for signature by Lhe Chairman of the Board of County conmrssiollers. This is, in Lurn, given to r-he County Treasurer, ,i1o will write a check r-o Defiance' Ltd' for t-he amount- sPecified. If you have any queslions, please call or wrrLe f-o t-ir:-s Office or t-he CounLY Planning DeParl-mettt-. SincerelY, CounLY At-torneY DDe P/l jb SCHI'UESEB G(N MEYER 'NC, September 18, 1987 Mr. Mark Bean Department of Develotrxnent, Suite 306 Garfield County Courthouse '109 Eiehth Street Glenr^ood Springs, OO 81501 RE: Mitchell Creek project Dear Mark: this letter is intended to apprise you of the recent activity regardingthe drainage plan on the Mitchell creek project. our firm was hired byMr. l4ark Iddin_gs of the Brokerage, representirrg F.ay Foss, to nodify thedrainage plan as prepared b1r,:ohnson Kunkle associates for the Mitchell Creek project. ltte areas of ocnoern expressed by Mark upon requestingthe services of Schmueser Cordon Meyer was to address the need for the60" eMPrs provided for debris flow passage underneath the rcad servingthe subdivision. rn our analysis, we have determined that the present drainage plan as proposed by Johnson Kunkle Associates is adequate for both debris flovr and normal- water flovl. However, rne have also determined that r,'e canmaintain the general crcncept of the drainage plan as proposed by John- son Kunkle with the orception of providing the 60" CMP underneath theroad. The need for the 60" CMP as rnentioned earlier was to pass thedebris flow under the noad. we are proposirg, instead, to provide a24" culvert under the noad at the debris flow fan locations. hle intendto allow the debris flow to pass over the road for trto major reasons.the first beinq that the cost of the 60" cMp versus a 24" cMp is muchgreater; the secrcnd regards rnaintenance. rn naintaining a 60" cMp, itis our feeling that the debris flow uould lodge within the CMp and in- tense labor rl,ould be required to clean one out. rf the dehris flow is allowed to sross the road and, at the same time stops, it r,ould be nnrcheasier and cruicker to clean the road with a blade versus intense laborto clear the CMP of debris. As you can see on the acc,ornpanying drainage map, urhrich is reproducedfrom the Johnson Kunkle map, vre are holdirg the same drainage pran as Johnson Kunk1e, whereas the only chanqes are in the size of the culvert and the metho<l of transferrirg the debris flovy across the road. ff 1ouhave any guestions, please do not hesitate to cal1. Sincerely, 2 Grand Avenue, Suite 212 -.dnwood Springs, Colorado 81601 (303) 945-1004 ffiTtrW GARFIELD COUNTY CO'VSULI,,VG ENG,,VEERS & SUBYE xc: Mark Iddings MEYER, INC. Glenwoou $prings Rural Fine Flrotectron District 0090 Mel-Rey Road Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 1,1sB7 l-rli"ji i -::::r :- i.--= I,i:. ,:-) lut*-- EANTIEiU UUUi!TY- GARF!ELD COUNTY Board of County Commissioners FLAVEN CERISE Carbondale 81623 ROBERT J. RICHARDSON Rifle 81650 LARRY R. SCHMUESER Glenwood Springs 8160 1 COUNTY COURTHOUSE 109 8th Street Suite 900 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601-3303 Telephone: (303) 945-91 58 (303) 62s-5571 CHUCK DESCHENES County Administrator September 2, 1986 PauI V. Depp, Vice President First Bank of Eagle CountY P. O. Box 567 Eagle, CO 81631 Re: Irrevocable tetter of Credit No. lE-I Dear l,lr. Depp: Pursuant to your phone conversation wiLh Don DeFord on 4ugust 29, L9861 please crcnsider this letter to be a request to draw $131100.00 under Letter of Credit llumber ttC-l, dated Septernber 6, 1985, of the First Bank of Eagle @unty. AIso enclosed is a properly endorsed draft and endorsement on the back of the above noted irrevocable Letter of Credit. If you have any questions about this request, please call Don DeFord, County Attorney at, 945-9150. Your prorpt restrrcnse to this request, would be atrpreciated. Sincerely, ry Schmueser,Chairman Board of @unty ConrnissionersC,arfieLd County I,SrZemh encl. DRAFT ! Glenwood Springs, @lorado Septen'rber 2, L986 PAY T0 THE ORDER. OF Board of @unty Comnissioners, @unty of Carfield, State of Colorado, IIIIRTEEN IIIOUSAND, ONE HUIIDRED DOLLARS AIID NO CEIITS. $ta, roo.oo. Drawn under letter of Credit lturnber MC-l, dated September 6, 1985, of the First Bank of Eagle County. ATTESTED:ENDORSEIvIENI: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF C,ARFTELD CCXJMTY, CoIXRADO i 1 _.-:7 * { FIRST BANK OF EAGLE COUNTY I Septernber 6, 1985 IRRE\rcCABIE LEIIER OF CREDIT I{o. MC-I t Board of Oounty @nruissioners County of Garfield State of Colorado Glenvpod Springs, Olorado Centlenen: I& hereby o[Er] our irrerrccable Ietter of Gedit in your favor avaiiafU h1,draft or drafts draurn on the First Bark of Eagle @unty for ani sum or isunsrot exceeding in total $131100.00. ,l: Flor the ac@unt of Mitchell Ceek Ltd., a Colorado Limited Partrershipiibx 929, Eagle, blorado 81631. / I'( ,r Fbr tle purpose of g:aranteeing onstrueEion of public iJrpro\re;ent9,"' requ-ired by thre Cor.rrty of C,arfield. Each draft drawn on First'gafik of Eagl-e @r:nty sight shall be erdorsed on the reverse side of tl.is Letter of Gedit and bear r4nn its fae "Dnanrn r:nder I€tter of Credit Nunber I'C-l, dated Septernber 6, 1985, of the First Bank of Eagle @r:nty". the First Bank of Eagle @r-rrty agrees withr the drar^,ers, endorsers and bonafide holders of drafts dravrn and negotiated in ccnpliane wittr ttre terms of this Ietter of Credit that such drafts will be duly honored rryon due presentatlon at tlre @unter of this bank. D<ept as other:\^rise provided, this Letter of Credit is to be governed bytte tlriform Gnrercial @de -- Letters of Credit of the State of Colorado. All drafts herer:nder must be drawn on or before Septenber 6, 1986. Verlz EAG,E COU}VIY Vie President p. o. Box 567, EAGLE, COLORADO 81631 / TELEpHONE (303) 328-6361 SS /. I Faul V. Depp EMORSEMENT: BOARD OF COUNTY GARFIELD COI]NTY, COMMISSIONERS OF COLORADO { I i r)1i,' ATTESTED: Ml/dred Alsdorf Garfield County t, , Chalrman Johnson, Kunkel & Associates, lnc. LAND SURVEYING . CIVIL ENGINEERING. MAPPING May 7, 1985 Ms- Barb Mobley MitcheII Creek partners P. O. Box 929 Eagle, Colorado 8163I Re:Mitchell Creek Subdivision Improvement s Dear Barb: Johnson, Kunkel & Associates, Inc. has conducted a construction reviewand as builts for lots IO, Il, and 19 of the First Filing of Mitchell CreekSubdivision in Garfield County, Colorado. Water and Sewer service insubstantial compliance with the plans and sepcifi-cations has been installed tothe above lots. JSK/agh KunkeL#$ P.O. Box 409 I l3 East 4th Street Eagte, Cotorado 81631 . phone: (303) 328-6368 GARFIELD COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT September 5, l9B5 Ali:ert A. Brururer 802 Grard Avenue Glenwood Springs, CO 8r-601 Dear l4r. Brunner: As I noted in our conversation on September 4, L985, the Carfield County Attorney nas adviseo thrs orfice ano the lluuding Officrar not to issue any additional building permits in the itlitchell Creek Project, Filing wo.1. The reason for tnis oeterminatron is due to the fact that the developer has not conpleted the agreed upon suodivisron inprovements and there is no longer any vatrd security in place with the County to guarantee the conpletion of the improvements. Until security is in pJ-ace to guarantee the conpletion of the inprovenents, the County will not issue any additional building permttsfor this develotrment. Mr. iEnton has been advised of this determination and has indicated that he is trying to obtain the necessary security. If you have any additional guestrons or concerns, feel free to call orwrite to me, at your convenience. Sincerely, 7na,*-4Cr,'- l,lark L. Bean Planning Director MLB/emh 109 8TH STREET, THIRD FLOOR 945-821 2 / 625-5571 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COI-ORADO 81601 Mitchell Creek' Ltd. P.O. Box 929 Bagle, Colorado 81631 Telephone: 328-6339 July 29, l-985 Mark BeanGarfield County P.O. Box 640 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81602 RE: Electric Pole location Dear Mark, This letter is being sent at your request, to explain Mitchell Creek, Ltd. position on thJmatter of the OrDel1's satellite dish in writing. When we went through the subdivision process in Garfield County in 1981r w€ indicated on the plans that there would probably be underground electrical service to the 22 southern lots on our propeity. When it came time to install the electrical service, the Cfenwooa Springs Electric System (goU Nastin) wanted to install overhead servite, because of maintenance, and because all the existing service in West Glenwood Springs was overhead. We discussed this witfr at1 lot owners, with all people hotding contracts on lots in the project, and with any prospective purchasers prior to actual electrical service installation, and alI agreed. We have required all secondary runs to be underground. The electrical service was completed in December, 1984. The limited partnership did not locate the pole that the electric company placed to extend service, and there is no transformer on the pole. There were already existing overhead electrical lines when Mrs. O'Dell installed her satelli{e dish, and the electric company only installed an extra pole for service to the subdivision. We would suggest that Mrs. O'DeII speak to the Gtenwood Springs Electric System, about the possibility that one of the two transformerl located in the previously existing line (before Mitchell Creek) is getting o}d, and therefore interferring with her satellite reception. If I can be of any further assistance in this matter please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, *"b"a-/fheu Barbara L. Mobley U Corporate SecretaryMitchell Creek Corporation General Partner Dlitchell- Creek, Ltd. P.O. Box 456 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 8L6O2 Telephone: 945-6483 March 13, 1985 Garfield County Attorneyr s I09 Bth Street, Suite 300 Glenwood Springs, Colorado Attention: Steven J. Zwick As stated in the Commissioners the Office 816 01 MA[i 1,! t3g5 GARTIILD COU,NTY ATIORNTY Dear Steve, Enclosed are copies of several letters concerning water run-off that were sent to Garfield County in October and November. These letters state our position on the Notice of Claim sent to Garfield County on February 28, 1985. The property claiming damage is presently vacant land, the propertv owners are concerned that a prescriptive drainage easement will be created, if run-off water continues to empty onto the property, and may cause problems when the property is developed. The run-off from Mitchell Creek PUD is supposed to go into the roadway ditch alongr County Road 130. That ditch carries a lateral ditch to the subject property, which means that no roadway ditch exists where Creekside Court ( road from Mitchell Creek PUD ) enters County Road 130. There is no place for the water to go but into the lateral and ont.o the subject property. The subject property is also receiving run-off water from adjacent developments (specifically Ponderosa) of greater magnitude than from Mitchell Creek. ober 5, 1984 letter to the Garfield County MiIEEII_ErEC nsta11 se thunderstorrng, we were in the process f,r instarLing water and sewei 1ines;-il4-revegetating disturbed land when these storms occurred. When notified that the ditch under County Road 130 was plugged and therefore water was flowing out of the ditchr we took immediate steps to eliminate the potential for recurrence of this problem. We have sinc.ej:rsta.Ifgd a drainaqe culvert under the road, as shown-oalb-elinal plat documents, which wilt divert most of the water running down the road into the subject ditch. We cleaned out the existing culvert that crossed County Road 130, that carries the lateral ditch to the subject property, deepened the existing ditch as needed, revegetating the cut slopes, and this Spring wiII place several small temporary straw dams to catch run-off debris from unvegetated areas. Garfield County Attorneyrs Office Page 2 March 13, 1985 A meeting with the Garfield County Commissioners was held on November 5, 1984 to discuss this very problem. We sent eopies of our engineer's anticipated flow rates for Mitchell Creek PUD to Mr. Stoddard on November 21, 1984 along with a letter stating several other problems involved in this matter. We have authorized Stephen Connor, attorney to negotiate on our behalf with Charles M. Stoddard an agreement that hopefully will alleviate the subject property owners eoncerns about creation of a prescriptive drainage easement. We will keep you informed as to our progress. -] I I I l {incerety, #,{!A.t\*k PresidentMitchell Creek Corporation General Partner Enclosures xc: Stephen Connor MitcheII Creek Ltd. P. O. Box 456 Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 Attn : I"1r. Harof d G. Denton, Pres. Attorney for W. E. Parkison, et aI CMS : !w cc: W. E. Parkison, Esq. 2311 I'leadow Lark Lane Glenwood Springs, CO 81601- Iulessrs- Adolph and Floyd Diemoz 214 Center Drive Glenwood Springs, CO 81CrO1 Charles M. Stoddard Attorney at Law 812 Pitkin Avenue, P. O. Box 697 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81602 December 7, 1984 Telephone 9417474 Area Code 303 DEC I O 1984 GA(l-ii,Li) COUNTY ATTORNU The Board of Garfield County Colnmissioners P. O. Box 640 Gl-enivood Springs, CO 81602 Attn: Earl Rhodes, Esg. Mr - Wii 1 iam R. Lorah P- O. Box 219 Glenwood Springs, CO 8I602 RE: Mitchell Creek Project/W. E. Parkison, et aI Dear Harold: Thanks for your letter of Nov. 21 with enclosures. Regardless of whether the increased flow is from the }4itchell Creek project or from the property adjacent to yours flowing across your land, it is'apparent there has been a substantial increased fLow onto my clientsr land caused by your development which my clients should not, and do not intend to, suffer. So long as my clients' land remains undeveloped, such increased ffow causes no undue problem. Our concern is that if such increased flow is permitted to continue you may acquire a prescriptive right to continue to flow water onto their land. To accommodate yourconcerns, as well as to protect their rights, my cJ-ients are willing to grant you a license to use their ditch for such increased flow revocable at wi1l. This couid perhaps resolve your problem as well as their rights, since if their ]and is developed, it may then be possible to divert the water back onto Mitchell Creek or elsewhere without undue difficulty or expense. However, it cannot be determined at this time what may develop in the future and my clients' right to terminate any increased flow onto their land for your development must be maintained. If you are willing to consider working out a license that accommodates your concerns as well as those of my clients, please 1et me know by Friday, Dec. 21, otherwise, I will assume you are rrot and that my clients should seek an injunction enjoining you from diverting water onto their proPerty. I am for- warding a copy of this letter to the Garfield County Commissioners to the attention of EarI Rhodes, Esg. for their info. May I please hear from you. FIRST BANK OF' EAGLT COUNTY Septernber 18, 1984 IRRE\rcABT,E LSfiF]R OF CREDIT IIc. lC-I Board of Cor:nty Connfssioners County of C,arfield State of Colorado Gentlenen: We hereby o[En our irrerrccable Letter of Credit in your farior arzailable by draft or drafts drawn on the Fi-rst Bank of Eagle County for arry stun or suns not exceeding j:r total $16,575.00 For the account of Irtitchell Creek Ltd., a @lorado tiJrLited Partnership, P. O. Box 456, Glenvood Springs, OO 81602. For ttre purpose of gn:arantying crcnstruction of public inprovernents required by ttre County of C,arfield. Each draft dravar on First Banl< of -Eag1e Cor-lnty sight shall be endorsed on the reverse side of this Letter of Gedit and bear r4>on its face "Dran'm under Letter of Credit Nunber IC-I, dated Septernber 18, 1984, of ttre First Bank of Eagle County"- The First Bank of Eagle Cor:nty agrees witJ: ttre dran'ers, endorsers and bonafide holders of drafts drawn and negoti"ated in conpliance with the terms of this Letter of Credit ttrat. such drafts will be duly honored tpon due presentation at the ocunter of tJ.is bank. E<cept aS othel:\fise provided, t},is Letter of Credit is to be governed by tlre tlniform Connercial Code -- Letters of Credit of the State of Colorado. AIl drafts hereurrder must be drarart on or before Jr:ne 17, 1985. p. o. Box 567, EAGLE, COLORADO 81631 / TELEPHONE (303) 328'6361 i+qTlll 51s84 XUi 81602 -"i$j / s ( Board of Garfield P.O. Box 640 Glenwood SPrings, Ftitchell Creek, Ltd ' P-O. Box 456 Glentrood Springs, Colorado TelePhone: 945-5483 October 5, 1984 County Commissioners Colorado 81602 Velasquez, Chairman This is in response to Mr. W.E. Parkison's letter dated october 2, L984. We realir-. trr-t there have been some inconveniences to Mr' Louis Moda and his neighbor to the east this fall during a coup].e of severe thunderstorms. we were not aware that Mr. Parkison had been affected, and would like to invite l"ir. Parkison in the future to contact mYself directlv. The MitchelI creek Project improvements were not fu1ly installed at the time of these intense thunderstorms. We were in the process of installing water and sewer iirr"=, shaping banks, final grading- and planting, and we harl not instaffed the maj-or <irainage culvert' which wilt carry the traditional run-off from the upper portion of The Mitchell creek-Project to Mitchelt creek. The fact that no vegetation had yet established, along with the existence of loose top soil in the new roadway ditches combined with the excess run-off clogging the culvert that crosses county Road 130, and forcing the draj naqe to flow across the road. Debris also fi11ed the lateral ditch, where it runs in front of these two homes causing the run-off to overflow the ditch banks and deposit silt on the two yards' When we were notified of the problem, we took temporary steps immediately to eliminate trre potential for a recurrence of this problem. A ditch was dug .".o=s the MitcheIl creek road (creekside court) to temporarily divert water from the upper qllt of the project, until a culvert is installed. This culveit wilt be permanently installed this faIl. We also cleaned out the existing eulvert which crosses county Road r30, and wiclened, ereaned and/or realigned !h-' ditch where 1ipasses in front of the two residences' We witl finish reshaping and'Llea1nq disturbed areas when we complete this work' Attenti on : Gentlemen: Larrv I sPoke with Mark Bean explained what stePs were return to normal. This is cause debris to flow across about- this situation several vreeks ago and being taken and that the situation should evidenced by last nights rain, which did 130 Road at Ponderosa, but not at Creekside Court Board of CountY Commissioners Page 2 October 5, 1984 I agree with I"1r. Parkison, that it would be nice if run-off water and ditch water could be separated, but since the lateral in question utilizes the road drainJge way it does not look feasible' In conclusion, the situation wi-tt our temporary measuresr. is returning to its historical operatin! conditioi and will continue with the installation of permanent improvemT'=' il;i{tLftHarold G. Denton President, Mitchell Creek CorPoration General Partner xc: Mr. W.E. Parkison West Glenwood Sanitation District 0051 Us Eighway 5 & 24 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 September 11, 1984 Garfield County Department of Development P.O. Box 640 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81502 Attention: Mark L. Bean Dear Mr. Bean, This is to confirm that Mitchelt Creek, Ltd. has installed the sewer lines in Phase I and Phase II of the Mitchett Creek Project, Filing No. 1, Lots I through 9, and 20 through22. The lines were installed by their contractor, and have been inspected satisfactorily, and will be accepted upon receipt of "as-built drawings" by the West Glenwood Sanitation District. Very truly yours, SANITATION DISTRICT Lee Erlewold President Johnson, Kunkel & Associates, tnc. LAND SURVEYING . CIVIL ENGINEERING. MAPPING September 1I, 19B4 Garfield County DepartmentP. O. Box 640 Glenwood Springs, ColoradoAttention: Mark L. Bean of Development 81602 Re: i.litchel-1 Creek Improvements Dear Mr. Bean: This is to confirm that Mitchell Creek, Ltd. hassubstantially completed Creekside Court according to thespecifications and drawings done by our firm, Johnson,Kunkel & Associates, Inc. for Phase I and II of theMitchell Creek Project, Filing No. 1 to a point of placinggravel on the subgrade. Additional gravel and paving willbe required to complete the roads and one culvert atStation 6 + 75. The water l-ine and sewerin the locations specified inis in general compliance with yours, '/nh fic*'* John L. MacKown Professional Engineer JLM/gg line have been installed our drawings, and the siphon the drawings. trulyVery P.O. Box 409 . 113 East 4th Street Eagle, Colorado 81631 Phone: (303) 328-6368 September 5, 1984 Garfield County Department of DevelopmentP.O. Box 640 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81502 Attention: Mark L. Bean Dear Mr. Bean, This is to confirm that Mitchell Creek, Ltd. has installed the retaining wa1l in the Mitchell Creek Project, Filing No. 1. The wa11 was installed according to the drawings done by Mountain Engineering & Land Surveying Companyr and Robert Barrett ofTerra Task in Grand Junction, Colorado. Very truly yours, MOUNTAIN ENGINEERING & LAND SURVEYTNG COMPANY Grou .r.'ll.i%'ii?",,if,?riit, ":,Q t- September 5, 1984 Garfield County Department of Development P-O. Box 640 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81602 Attention: l,Iark L. Bean Dear Mr. Bean, This is to infornr you that Mitchell Creek, Ltd. has installed the waterIines in Phase I.t of the Mitchell Creek Project, Filing No. 1, Lots 5through 9 , and 20 through 22. The lines viTere installed by theircontractor. The line was visually inspected and pressure testing was done by the Ci'ty of Glenwood Springs Water Department, and theinspection and testing were satisfactory. Very truly yours, Water - Waste Water Program Director u) ltitchell Creek, ttd- 818 Colorado Avenue, Suite 305 P-O. Box 455 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81602 Telephone: 945-5483 August 5, 1984 Mark L. BeanGarfield County Department of Development P.O. Box 640 Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 Dear Mark, This letter is in response to your letter referenced above. The following are comments on an item by item basis: 1. The Phase I of getting the Phase f utilities are complete. We are in the process "the appropriate documentation" so we can get letter of credit completely released. 2. 3. As of today the water line is in and has been inspected by the City of Glenwood SpriDgs, a deposit has been made to the City of Glenwood Springs for electrical service, the sewerline is in and has been inspeeted by the West Glenwood Sanitation District, the retaining waII is completed, and the natural gas is installed, we are getting the appropriate documentation for the county so this letter of credit can be substantially reduced. We are presently working to obtain the needed letter of credit to cover the remaining Phase fI utilities. We would tike to extend the date for giving the County a letter of credit on the third phase of utility installations. Would you please advise us of the procedure we need to fo1low to accomplish this. us know what more you need from us to get this matter cleared Corporate SecretaryMitchell Creek Corporation, General Partner Please Iet up. Sincerely, L-- Mobley, GLENWOOD SPRINGS ELECTRIC SYSTEM August 7, 1 984 FILE: 590 Garfield County Department of Development P.O. Box 640 Glenwood Sorings, CO 81602 Attention: Mark L. Bean Dear Mr. Bean: This is to confirm that Mitchell Creek, Ltd. has deposited funds in the amount of $3000.00 with the Glenwood Springs Electric System for extension of electrical service to the Mitchell Creek Project, Filing No. 1, Lots 5 through 9, and 20 through 22. The lines have not been installed, but are being scheduled for installation in the near future. Very truly yours, GLENWOOD SPRINCS ELECTRIC SYSTEM WuGJ/G-.%_ Robert J. Nastan, P.E. Electric System Manger cc : Ha rold Denton, TV I RJN/pjb 302 W.8TH STREET GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 8160I 303/945-6672 If,Tf, r?,i?.rJflil I 1984 ;i . .1, -.\ ltitchell Creek, Ltd- 818 Colorado Avenue, Suite 306 Glenwood SPrings, Colorado 81501 TelePhone: 945-6483 July L6, 1984 Garfield CountY Department of DeveloPment P.O. Box 640 Glenwood SPrings, CO 81602 Attention: Mark L. Bean, Senior Planner Dear Mark, As you and Harotd discussed earlier tast week, we believe the way to solve the problems with the Mitchell Creek Project and avoid plat vacation and disagreements are as follows: 1. Phase I utilities are essentially 1008 complete and the need for securitY should be removed' 2. Phase II utilities are presently about 508 complete, t'i!! the remaining 50E presdntly being installed. In 30 to 60 days we will be in i position where security will no longer be needed on the major percentage of Phase rr ' 3. As agreed, only the roadway excavation has been done in Phase III of the project. These three phases are for utility installation purposes, and all three phases tryty make ,ip one develofim.ttt. We have shown substantial p'og'es-=byproceedinginthisdifficulteconomyto "o*fl"t. phise I and If, and believe a time extension to "o*i1"t" Phase III utilities would be reasonable. We would like to meet in the near future to establish what steps need to be taken. Sincerely, e,,b;/rfr'il+ Barbara L. t"tobleY, U Corporate SecretarY MitchelI Creek CorPoration, General Partner GARFIELD COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT PLANNING / ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH / BUILDING. 945'8212 JuIy 9, I9B4 Harold G. Denton, President I'4itchetl Creek, Ltd. BI8 Colorado Ave., Suite 306 Glenr+rood Springs, C0 8160I Dear Mr. Denton: please consider this letter to be a forrnal notice of intent from C'arfield-o*ty to file Lhe "Consent to Vacation of PIat" for the I"litchell Creek pUO Final Plat in 30 days from the date of this letter' Ttre reason for *,i= t"tter is non-comPiiance with the requirement for posting a letter of credit in the amount of $g0r583.00 for Phase Ihree construction as agreed upon in the anrended Subdivision Improvements Agreement dated JuIy 25, f'ggg. There is no security presently for any of the construction activity protrrcsed. There have been inguiries as to the status of the Phase TWo improvements Uy p.o"p.ctive proftrty purchasers. O.rr resS:onse, to date, is that the l,titchell Creek devlloper! harre not requested release from the obligations contained in the SuMivision Improvements Agreement. As such, the @unty has not accepted the improvements and will not issue building 5:ermits. If you have information indicating any agreenent contrary to the info?mation contained in this letter, please contact Lhis office' Otherwise, the @unty wiII vacate the },litchell Creek PLID Final Plat as noted previously, unless arrangements are made to correct this problem. Sincerely, fY)all{&** Mark L. Bean Senior Planner ItrB/emh XC: Earl Rhodes,County AttorneY r 09 8TH STREET P.O BOX 640 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 8I 602 FIRST JuIy 25, OF' EAGLE COUNTY Irrevocable Letter of Credit Nunber l4C-2 Board of 6r.rrty @nrnissioners Cor:nty of Carfield State of Colorado Centlenen: !^Ie hereblr open our irrevocable Letter of eedit in your favor available by draft or drafts drawn on the First Bank of Eagle @unty for any stun or suns not exceed.ing in total $100,000.00. For the account of MITCIIELL CREEK LTD., a @Iorado Limited Partrership, P.O. Box 1020, Eagle, Colorado; For tke purpose of gnraranteeing construction of pr:blic irrprovenents reguired by the CounLy of C;arfield. Each draft drawn on First Bank of Eagle @unty at sj-ght shatl be endorsed on the reverse side of tkris Ietter of Gedit dated JuIy 25, 1983 frcrn the First Bank of Eagle County. The First Bank of Eagle County agrees with the drawers, endorsers, and bonafide holders of drafts drawn and negotiated in ccrpliance with the terms of this I-etter of Gedit, that such drafts will be duly honored ulnn due presentation at the cotnter of this bank. Except as oths:vrise provided this Letter of Credit is to be governed by the Urniform Connercial Code Letters of Credit of thre State of @lorado. A11 dtafts.,lrereunder must be drawn on or before April IB, 1984. veq{ .}-.r'- Paul V.- Depp Vice President P. O. BOX 567, EAGLE, COLORADO 81631 / TELEPHONE (303) 328.6361 SS Johnson, Kunkel & Associates, lnc. LANO SURVEYING . CIVIL ENGINEERING' MAPPING October 13, L9B2 Mr. Hanold Denton General PartnerMitchell C::eek Ltd. Box 1020 Eag1e, Colorado 81631 Re: 30 foot hiqhwater set back MitcheIl Creek Project, Filing No. I JR/8t/LBs Dear Harold: The final plat of l'litbhelI Creek Project Fil-ing No. I indicates the l1mits of the tOO year floodplain for Mitchell Creek. This limit does not correspond to the high water mark as referred to in Section 5.07.01 of the County Subdivision Regulations for set backs fiom the hiqh water marks of a live stream. The natural vegetation line, that is, the point at {vhieh natural ground covei is able to exist, is considered the normal high water mark for a live stream. Mitchel.I Creekts normal wiatfr varies between 8 and 12 feet. Therefore the building setbacks for a1I but a sma1l portion of Lot 4 would be 30 feet or greater from the high water mark. Should the 15 foot setback from the Westerly ]ot line of Lot 4 be modified to 20 feet, then the County's requirement for a 30 foot stream setback could be met. Should you have any guestions please feel free to contact me. ffi#ely, / MacKown P.O. Box 409 . I l3 East 4th Street Eagle, Colorado Bl63l . Phone: (303) 328'6368 RICHARD D. LAMM Governor JERIS A. DANIELSON State Engineer OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 1313 Sherman Street-Room 818 Denver, Colorado 80203 (303) 866-3581 0ctober 8, 1982 Mr. Dennis Stranger Garfield County Planning Department 2014 BLake Avenue Glenwood Springs, C0 81601 HDS/KCK:ma cc: Lee Enewold, Div. Eng. Barbara Mobley Dear Mr. Stranger: We have received additional information concerning the City of Glenwood Springs and the West Glenwood Water District which is supplied by the City. The District is named as the supplier for the above named subdivisions. The information provided includes a letter from the City Attorney dated October 5, 1982 and a letter from the City Engineer dated September 5, L982. The City clains ownership of the Glenwood Light and Water Conpany System water rights adjudicated in 1907 in District Court Case No. 466. These rights in Gttzzly and No Name Creeks are for a total of 20 cfs. We believe these rights are sufficiently senior that they will be a reliable supply. Information on the physical availability of water at the cityrs proposed points of diversion is limited, however, the City Engineer indicates these sources have been reliable to date. The City Attorney indicates there is not currently a contract between the City and the District, but that one may be forthcoming. The Engineerrs letter indicates peak day denand in West Glenwood is estimated to be 3.09 nillion gallons per day. The attorneyrs letter indicates the proposed agreement would be for ten years and would be for a maximum of four million gallons per year. ltre believe the Attorney means four nillion gallons per day. We can recommend approval of these proposals conditional upon the finaliza- tion of the contract between the City and the District. We would further con- dition this upon it being verified the contract is for four rnillion gallons per day. We request a copy of the contract for our files once it is finalized. 0$ r3 $B? li. , I.Li..rr,i.t*'10*"tto t'' Re: Mitchell Creek Glenwood Springs Mal1 Sincerely,k*k, Assistant State Engineer Octoberl,ru LUUSL J, L2r tvir. HaI D. Simpson Assist.?nt State Engineer Division of iiai:er Resources 1313 Shr=rrtan Street Rcom BIB Dsnver, Colorado 80203 ,l,e: City of Glenwood Springs water rights Dear I,lr. Simpson: Mr. Kevin Kadlec, the City Engineer, has asked me to respond to your request with regard to the the City's water rights related to the ,l1i t.che11 cr eek Pro j ect. It s5ouId be first noted that the City and the'r^Jest Glenwood inlal-er District have no formal agreement wit.h regard to water service. The City ter.minated the former agreement last year when su'V€rdI prcblems Srose with regard to approval of new taps onto the systLrn and other aclministrative problerns. The City Propo?td, opproiirnately four months a9o, a new ag reement and has to date receive no iormal response from the District. F.t the present time, the City Council has not taken any formal action with regard to th; failure of the District to enter into a new ugi"u,',tent; however, such action cou1d, but not necessarily wi11, ba taken if a new agreement is not reached soon. I have been 1ed to believe Lhat one of the DisLrictrs problerns is the inst-al1ation of master meters, and f have also been told that these meLerS have been received by Lhe District at l-his time anticipate an agreement will be entered into in the next few 'v,,-oekS. ?he orirnary term of that agreement would be for a Period of ten y"u.=. Dr:.i,',g that period 1f,e City will provide the District uni tf, up l-o four million gallons of water a year and no more. The City l,,ater rights invoived in this contract are 20 cubic feet Per second and the present distribution system with proposed 996 CQOI'ER A\/Ei\iLlE GI-E\\{OOD SPIIINGS, COLORADO 81601 303i945-2575 improvemcnts is sufficient to supplymillion gaIlon per year contractedthis time, does no t fo resee any d iconLracted amount. Some of thedistribution system will be made rernainder due Lo be completed in the the Di str ict wi ti-r the f our amount of water. The City, dtff iculty with supplying theimprcvern,3nts to the wai-erin the next year with thenext five years. Tlre City water rights are from Grizzly and IJo Name Clreeks with adiversion strucl-ure frorn Grizzly to No Narne Creeks to divert titeGrizzly Creek water int.o No Name Creek f rorn which i t i s d ivertedii'll-o the Cit.y treatinent and ciistribution sysLe:m. The Cecrees forthese ri3ht-s were issued by the EagIe Cor.rnty Discrict- Court incause number 420 ivhich vJas superceded by a decree in cause number465. T'he iaLer Cecree was entered on Decernber 9, 1907 and isrecorded in Judgment Bock 2, pages 453-459. AlLhough I am notsure of the priority dates of these decrees, I believe them to bein the late 1800's. I hbve written to the Eagle County DistrictCcurt Clerk requesting copies of the decrees but have not yetreceived them. If you woul-d like a copy of these, please adviseme, and I rvi1l be happy to forward copies Lo you v,,hen I receive t.hem. If you need any f urther information on tlris, please f eel f ree tocontact me. Sincerely, ;t H. -'.^tilCharles H. tnJillman, p.C. Ci ty Attorney xc : l'1e red i th F1 i nn Kev in Kad lec ftlL-D=.ADD =-TA-rt rffFQ='E=-T ==R\,/l[tA Division of Colorado State University --*-tT.] I 1982 Seotember B, 1982ljil fLttt*I{Sl llr. Roqer lenton Denton Associates o Inc. P. 0. Box 1r)20 Eagle, Co. 81631 RE: l''ll tchel l Creek Project Dear Mr. Denton, After our visit to the l{itchell Creek oroject site on Auqust'12, 1982, I recognlze the lack of flexlblljtv.vou are faced vrlth ln tems of road desien because of severe topocrraphy inherent on the slte. !,le discussed several wildrire mltigation possibilities and I think r,re both aqreed on fire fightino equipmen'i housed at each hydrant as the most feasible, Basic equiprnent at e_ach fire hydrant would include at least the f,ollowing: (lX ft. for the l.litchell Creek Court h.:rdrant) (SOO tt. at each of the three Creekside Court rtlyrJrants) 1 ea. hydrant wrencl 2 ea. Ik" nozzlesI ea. llr" qated wve 2 ea. 1t2!' male x female adaptors 4 shovels 2 pulaskis (hoe, axe combination) Approxlrnate cost f,or equlprrrent {n all 4 hydrant locatlons: $2400 SEP Equipment at each hvdrant location should be housed in a durahl,:, vermln-nroof shed. I must caut{on that such equlpment, lf maintained in good conditiot't" mitigate significant wlldfire hazard present by minimal road design, hlghly flarnmable fuels in the area, and the encouragtenrcnt of highlv home design and exterior building materials. vreather-ti qitt . nl I I on1-v dense and fl amnabl e -i-1. .r i :=i r- . .'i:jii i- 1 ' 1.. -l L{!p1ri=i i; *.-; i -i -: ol,Ijicf hn " 1o' i:qf r -rtr i '--, :"i I' t:rt.li ri ' :' i ';i i'r': " r ,- i.i i. .l ':.i J)i."t'.. .'-' .. ,.. a.,- ". .- -.. .. ''!.. ."' / 1..i t '.-' . | 't r.fr' r i) lrli;t Iiti ,1,ii;ii.gr..:; ,.-,. 1,,6:'. 3ifl:rl;' . ;!.) i l:,'.i. .r,<, t , i ',, -.;' l,i.,p,i;, i-.. v{r, ,:i },i . .: ,li' H r: +t,:r'.. ,r'.1 :f. it ,,'i i; i l,'' '. . ...-- j \ -?- Such very.mlnlmal flre fightlng tools would be worthless ln a ma.Jor flre wlthoutthlnnlng (and keeolng thlnned) the Cense veqetation, and requlrlng non-flanrnablerooflng and sldlng materlals. Sl ncerel v, John Denisonristrict Forester cc: Dennis Stranger, aarfleld County planninq Dept. T T -UTPqcfi&u '/ 1982 September 3, 1982 vrl" drdfil{& Mr. HaI D. Simpson Assistant State Engineer Division of Water Resources 1313 Sherman Street Room Bl8 Denver, Colorado 80203 Re: Mitchell Creek Project Dear Mr. Simpson: We have received a copy of your July 15, L982 letter to Dennis Stranger of Ehe Garfield County Planning Department in which you indicated four items of needed information concerning the City of Glenwood Springsr water systenc. A11 of the information as requested is not available, however, I do feel that the information provided below wil-1 serve your needs at this time. Sunrmary of tr^Iater Rights Owned or Controlled - Current source of yi s entire service area is No Name/Gtizz|y Creek. The City holds 20 CI'S water rights on this system. Projected water demands of all growth anticipated ln the service area to the 1,ear 2000 indicate that these water rights are suffi- cient. Yield on These ntght" i" l"utrgu ""a - The City is not on the No Name/ Gri^zzlry Creek water sheds. The yield of the springs which establish the base flows i.n these streams under conditions of draught is unknorrn, however, the sources have been reliable to date and the projected rate of increase in demand will allow us suffi- cient tine to study the hydrogeology of the source. Present Demand on the system and Ant ,l LJ, I. 806 COOPER AVENUE GLENTVOOD SPRINGS. COLORADO 81601 3031945-2575 Z. 3. Mr. Hal Sirnpson -2- 4. A Copy of the Contract Between the City and the District - The o1d contract under which the City and the district have been functioning has expired. The City and the district are currently in the process of developing a new agreement or contract. This new agreement should be cornpleted in approxinately one rnonth and will i-ncorporate provisions to provide adequate supply to the West Glenwood service area. If you have any questions concerning the above, please call me at 945-257 5 . Very r-{,fr, ev]-n City Engineer cc: Dennis Stranger Barbara llobley KJK/jp yours,. 806 COOFER AVENUE GLENTVOOD SPRTNGS, COLORADO 81601 3031945-2575 . TABLE 5-4 PROJECTED WATER DEMAND (MGD) ul Io, Average Dailv Demand Existing (1980) residents at 410 gpcd; future residents average tourist population. Maximum Dav Demand Maximum day = 2.6? times average day. Peak Hour l)emand Peak hour = 4.50 times average day. at 260 gpcd; Tourists (present and future) at 100 gpcd per Area t9B0 1990 2000 Avr: Day Max Day Peak Hour Ave Day Max Day Peak Eour Ave D.y Max Day Peak Hour West Glenwood North Glenwood Downtown Mid-City & South Grand Cardif f Four Mile 0 .78 0. 18 l.42 0.44 0. 18 0 2.08 0.48 3.79 1.17 0.48 0 3.51 0.81 6.39 I .9s 0.81 0 1.11 0.33 7.47 0.48 0. 50 0 .49 2.96 0.88 3.92 t.z8 1 .33 1.31 4.99 1.48 6.60 2.16 z.z5 z.zt 1.16 0.36 1.48 0.67 0. 57 0. 59 3.09 0.96 3.94 1 .80 I .51 1.58 5.ZZ t.62 6.66 3. 03 2.55 2.67 Total 3.0 8.0 13.5 4.37 11 .68 19.69 4.83 12.88 ?-1.75 2. 3. GARTIELD COUNTY @NCERNS E PRELIMINARY PLAN REVIEI^I 1. Remainder of Submittal Fee for Preliminary PIan: The $139.50 submittal fee was paid on JuIy 21, 1982' Developer Commit to Specific Improvements: This wiIl be discussed later. Fire Mitigation Plan Addressing the Concerns of the Colorado State Forest Ser vice ! John Dennison of the Colorado State Forest Service, after reviewing this site, concluded that it would be impossibte to put a road connecting the back seven tots to the front seven tots. He then suggested that a fire box be installed at each fire hydrant so that residents of subdivision could fight wild fires before the Glenwood Springs Fire Department reached the site. At a meeting on August 20th with Fire Chief Zancanella we asked him for his opinion on this idea of John Dennisonrs. He said he was opposed to the idea because homeowners couLd get hurt due to a lack of knowledgeoffirehy.drantoperation7andbecausethehomeownersmaynot call the fire department until the fire was out of control. Dollar Value of.58 Acres of Land be Paid to the Roaring Ftrrk School District: The Board of county commissioners in their recommendation stated that the fee to be paid to the Roaring Fork School District should be either the calculation used by the school district in their recommendation of ' 58 acres of land x the purchase price per acre of the property, or $200.00 per lot, whichever is greater. we are filing a final plat on 22 of the 29 lots, so the amounE to be paid with filing I is $3,92I.1-0. (This was calculated using the purchase price value per acre x.58 acres x .7586 the number of lots in filing one divided by the total * of lots' ) Or $200 x 22 = $4,400.00, so we will agree to pay the $41400'00r when the commissioners decide that it should be paid. Agreement Between the Ditch company and the Property owners: Drawings have been senL to the Reynolds cain Ditch company for their review and approvalr and the location of the easement. A letter will be provided to the County at final plat. Mitchell creek court be Privately o*ned and Maintained: A final plat is not being presented on the northerly seven lots and this condition is not. being addressed at this time, although it seems acceptable. Proof of Legal Access From County Road 132 to Mitchell Creek Court: A final plat is not being presented on the northerly seven lots and this condition is not being addressed at this tj.me, although it seems acceptable. 4. 5. 6. 7. -r- 8. 9. Thirty-Fbot Setback be Shown on Final Plat from Highwater Line on Mitchell Creek and Suitable Building Envelopes Delineated: These setbacks are shown on the final plat of the Mitchell Creek PUD. These building envelopes have been revised where necessary in accordance with the recommendations of the @unty Commissioners. Open Space Park and Open Space to be Dedicated to the Homeownersl Association and Maintenance Thereof Provided for in the Covenants: Ttre open space park and open space wilt be maintained by the l"litchell Creek Homeowners' Association. Assessments and collections of fees include maintenance of the open space & open space park (As stated in Article III Section I.) 10. Maintenance Access to the Improved Mudflow Channels: There are easements on the final plat for maintenance of the mudflow ehannels. The maintenance of the improved mudflow channels is provided for in the covenants. AII areas outside the building envelope are easements for utilitiesr drainager and maintenance and will be noted as such on the final plat. 11. School Buses Not Accessing MitcheIl Creek Court: A final plat is not being presented on the northerly seven lots and this condition is not being addressed at this time, although it seems acceptabl e. L2. Lots 23 through 29 WiIl Utilize Evapotransporation Septic Systems: A final plat is not being presented on the nortsherly seven lots and this condition is not being addressed at this timer however, our geologist is presently talking with the @lorado Geological Survey on removing this requirment. 13. Lots Having Building Envelopes Shown on the Final PIat: There is a Building Envelope shown on each lot of the final plat, which is now dimensioned as to exact location. 14. Lots Have a 251 Setback: The building envelopes have a 25 foot setback shown on the final plat. However, in two locations setbacks have been left at l0'where they would severly reduce the usabitity of the building site. At these locations lot access has been resLricted and is noted as such on the final plat. 15. Division of Water Resources Approval of Lega1 Water Supply: We have been working diligently with the West Glenwood Water District, the Division of Water Resources, and the City of Glenwood Springs to try to reach some conclusion as to the probability of water flowing in West Glenwood. To date, West Glenwood feels there's no problem at all, the City of Glenwood Springs cannot figure out where the papers are to tell them if they have water or not, and Division of Water Resources canrt figure out why any of us want water anyhow. Actually, we feel that we are being inserted by Garfield County between a rock and hard place. We do not really know what more we can do to correct an exisEing problem that we were in no way a part of creating and we ask that the Garfield County planning @mmission and Board of County Commissioners not use us as a pawn in a problem that is not ours. -2- Items Addressed By the City of Glenwood Springs Engineer: A. Drainage. 1. Channel and Culvert fmprovement Cross Section Determined on Calculated Mud Flow \rclumes and Water: Yes. Calculations were based upon mudflow volumes where appropiate and they were based on water flow problems where approp iate. 2. Improved Channel Profile l{atch Existing Grade or WilI Grade of Channel be Increased: Gtannel profiles are deepened and increased to handle anticipated debris flow volumes. The grade of channels will match existing grade wherever possible and is increased only where reguired. Where grade is increased, catch pockets are provided where more natural grade is resumed. 3. @nsolidation by Pre-wetting be Monitored for Meguacy Prior to @nstruction: The pre-wetting will be monitored by the recommending g eolog i st . Road Design. Roadside Ditches Should be Erosion Protected: Iengths of roadside ditches are broken consistently by crossing debris flow channels and it is therefore felt that water flow and volumes will be insignificant as far as erosion. Ilowever, the 8t slopes do provide very positive drainage which should eliminate any possibilities of saturation of road sub-bases. Water. Number of Fire Hydrants Being Increased: tr:Ils to houses will not exceed 500r. A letter to Garfield Planning Department from Fire Chief Zancanella of the Glenwood Springs Fire Department addressing the fire hydrants on the tlitchell Creek PUD, said in Item *1, that rfire plugs and Iocation of plugs looks good in the lower section. " During a meeting of August 20th with Fire Chief Zancanella, he stated that the fire hydrants were adequate on the lower 22 lots. Since the pulls to the houses will not exceed 500' we feel we have addressed this guestion. Line Size on North Section Being lnadeguate for Fire Protection: A fi.nal plat is not being presented on the northerly seven lots and this condition is not being addressed at this time, although it seems acceptable. 1. I. 2. -3- B. c. 3.Soil ResistivitY to Lines: Soil resistivity determine if there be Tested to Determine Protection for Water wiII be tested at the time of excavation to is a need for additional protection. WaterAaste Water. 1. Water and Sewer Lines a Minimum of 10 Feet Apart llorizontally When Possible: water and se$rer lines will be separated horizontally by a minimum of I0 feet. when they cross or rvhen they are closer than 10 feetr theY will be encased. 2. Blow-offs Be Installed on All Dead-end Water Mains: Bl0w-offs will be installed on all dead-end installations. 3. Developers Responsibility for Installation of Prolnsed 8" DIP Ioop into Existing 8" water t'lains on Donegan Road and chalet Village and Mountain Shadows Drive: The developers wilt be responsible for installing the loop as shown on the final utility drawings. 4. Proper Easements for l'laintenance of Lines: Proper easements will be maintained. 5. No Comments by the City Engineer on Sewer Because the City is not ResPonsible for These Lines: . No comment. 5. Blue Line Elevation is 51875 Feet. Pressure Problems could D<ist Above This Elevation: A final plat is not being presented on the northerly seven lots and this condition is not being addressed at this time, although it seems accePtable. 7. Recommend A Generator for Back-up Electric eole Supply to the Proposed Booster PumP: A final plat is not being presented on the northerly seven lots and this condition is not being addressed at this time, although it seems accePtsable. 8. proposed Booster Pump and storage Tanks should not be the Responsibility of the City of Glenwood Springs: A final plat is not being presented on the northerly seven lots and this condition is not being addressed at this timer although it seems accePtable. g. proposed i{ater tine Under l"litchell Creek Should be Installed in Such a Manner as to Prevent @ntamination: A final plat is not being presented on the northerly seven lots and this condition is not being addressed at this time, although it seems accePtable. D. -4- 10. When Water and Sewer Lines Cross Each Other They Should do so in a Manner that is Acceptable to Colorado Department of Health: we hope and plan to do all of our utility installations in a manner that is totally acceptable to the Colorado Department of Health. 11. Precautions Should be Taken to Prevent Storage Tank or Booster Rrmp From Becoming Damaged During Debris Flows: A final plat is not being presented on the northerly seven Iots and this condition is not being addressed at this time, although it seems accePtable. L2. I"tore Details Considering the Distribution System to and from the Storage Tank: A final plat is not being presented on the northerly seven lots and this condition is not being addressed at this time, although it seems accePtable. 13. Sizing of Water Lines: A final plat is not being presented on the northerly seven lots and this condition is not being addressed at this time, although it seems accePtable. 14. Reasoning for an 2 L/2" Suction Li.ne to Booster Pump Then Reduced Back Down 2" Then Back Up to 2 L/2" r Etc., Etc.: e final plat is not being presented on the northerly seven lots and this conditlon is not being addressed at this timer although it seems accepEable. -5- Roaring Fork $chool District RE-l P.O. Box B2O Glenwood Sprlngs, Cotorado 8I601 Telephone (303) 945-6558 NICHOLAS R. MASSARO, Supe ri n tend ent DWIGHT L. HELM, Asslsrant Superintendent HOBERT D. LAFFOON, Asststant Supeilntendent, Buslness ,,. SinczrteX-u uoullA. \ h."i{)" P,Yh**,-a^o Nicho.b,s R. Ma.ttano |,tft. 0onni,s Stnangest Gan(ield Countq Pln"nning Doytt. 2014 BLafze- Avonue- G!.eyu,rtood Sytn Lng,s, C0 81601 RE: Mi.tchell Cne.Q.tz PtLoia.c.t. De"an Wt. Stnangen: The- Boand o[ Educalion o( the RoanLng Fottlz Scl,tool D.LsLq,Lct RE-l con- aidoned tl,te onount. prLopotQ-d bq the dove-Lopen- in ,LLeu o(1 .Land ded,Lcationo[ $5,168.73 Ln cctnnec.tion wi.th the. tl.Ltch.e,t[- Cttoeh pnoJe-ct. At ttlaL,L ttegu.Lan me-e,ting Lte-I-d Augurst 23, 1982 tl,te Boand votzd unaruLmou.t.Lq to acceytt that. anount to bo deytct,s.i-ted w,Lth the- Gan(ie,Ld Coun-tt4 Commi,s- tlonelu. ?Lea,se (eel $ttee- to conta"c.t. me i[ |uLtl,LuL in(onmaLLon i,t nozded. NRM/rut il*ftrp